HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-07-20 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet
Please note: If you have a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City of Englewood
(303-762-2405) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed.
Teleconferenced
Englewood, CO 80110
AGENDA
City Council Regular Meeting
Monday, July 20, 2020 ♦ 6:00 PM
This City Council Special / Regular meeting will be held by teleconference.
To view the meeting, please follow this link to our YouTube live stream link
1. Call to Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call
4. Study Session Topic
a. Parks and Recreation Director Christina Underhill and Manager of Open Space
Dave Lee will be present with the Parks and Recreation Commission Sub
Committee will present their recommendations for the off-leash program.
Pdf
5. Consideration of Minutes of Previous Session
a. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of July 6, 2020.
Teleconferenced City Council Special Regular - 06 Jul 2020 - Minutes - Pdf
6. Appointments, Communications, Proclamations, and Recognition
7. Recognition of Scheduled Public Comment
The deadline to sign up to speak for Scheduled Public Comment is Wednesday by 5 p.m., prior
to the meeting, through the City Clerk’s Office. This is an opportunity for the public to address
City Council. There is an expectation that the presentation will be conducted in a respectful
manner. Council may ask questions for clarification, but there will not be any dialogue. Please
limit your presentation to five minutes. Written materials for presentation to Council may be
submitted to the City Clerk.
a. Jake Gilbert, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding off-leash dog
parks.
b. Poorvi and Ross Pfenning, Englewood Residents, will address Council regarding
Maintaining Off-leash Dog Park Privileges at Jason, Duncan, and Centennial Parks.
c. Kelly Kane, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding Off Leah Parks.
d. Robert Taylor, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding Off-Leash Parks.
e. Ellen Hertzman, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding Preserve our
off-leash parks.
f. Raphaëlle Duchéan, an Englewood resident, will address Council.
g. Tim Hughey, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding Support of keeping
Page 1 of 268
Englewood City Council Regular Agenda
July 20, 2020
Please note: If you have a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City of Englewood
(303-762-2405) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed.
off-leash parks.
h. Josh Woodworth, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding keeping off-
leash dog park.
i. Anne Bitga, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding keeping Jason Park
off-leash.
j. Ryan Woodruff, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding support of off-
leash dog parks.
k. Jessica Semones, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding support of off-
leash dog parks.
l. Cindi Guilbert, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding Englewood off-
leash dog parks.
m. Patrick & Christine Maschka, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding off-
leash privileges.
n. Ana Varela, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding the importance of
off-leash dog areas.
o. Steve Kelly, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding off-Leash
Community Parks.
p. Jon Liberman, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding support of off-
leash dog parks.
q. Colleen Lucksinger, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding support of
off-leash dog parks.
r. Janice Brown, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding water pressure
problems.
s. Lauren Benner, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding Englewood
Unleashed.
t. Laura MacKenzie, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding support for
off-leash parks & development
u. Steven Jenkins will address Council regarding Mask Regulations.
S.Jenkins Public Comment 7.20.20
v. Michael Fealey will address Council regarding how sports can regenerate Englewood.
w. Barb Chumley, an Englewood Resident, will address Council.
x. Jaynah London, an Englewood Resident, will address Council regarding the needs for a
gate at Jason dog park.
8. Recognition of Unscheduled Public Comment
Page 2 of 268
Englewood City Council Regular Agenda
July 20, 2020
Please note: If you have a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City of Englewood
(303-762-2405) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed.
If you would like to sign-up to speak for public comment at the upcoming City Council
meeting for Monday, July 20th, please visit
https://englewoodco.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_ct8z_ytrR7WBEqw_AfA70A and register!
You will receive a unique and personalized invitation by email to join the meeting. Every speaker
who wants to register should sign-up with their own email address. If you do not have an email
address or if you have any questions regarding this process, please reach out to the City Clerk's
Office at CityClerk@englewoodco.gov or call 303-762-2430.
Citizens may also submit written public comments to the City Clerk's Office at
CityClerk@englewoodco.gov until 12 p.m. Tuesday, July 21st.
This is an opportunity for the public to address City Council. There is an expectation that the
presentation will be conducted in a respectful manner. Council may ask questions for
clarification, but there will not be any dialogue. Please limit your presentation to 3 minutes.
Currently, we are not able to accommodate public presentations, however, they can be
submitted for the packet.
Council Response to Public Comment
a. Elizabeth Rardin Murphy, an Englewood resident, addressed Council regarding off-leash
dog parks.
E.Rardin Public Comment 7.20.20
b. C. A. Dickerson submitted a written comment for Council regarding off-leash dog parks.
C.A. Dickerson Public Comment 7.20.20
9. Consent Agenda Items
a. Approval of Ordinances on First Reading
b. Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading.
c. Resolutions and Motions
10. Public Hearing Items
11. Ordinances, Resolutions and Motions
a. Approval of Ordinances on First Reading
i. CB 26 - Approval of IGA with Mile High Flood District (MHFD) for Design and
Construction of Little Dry Creek Plaza Drainage and Flood Control Improvements
Pdf
Staff recommends City Council approve a Bill for an Ordinance for Little Dry
Creek Plaza Drainage and Flood Control Improvements IGA. Staff: Capital
Projects and Engineering Manager Tim Hoos and Capital Project Engineer
Devin Keener.
Page 3 of 268
Englewood City Council Regular Agenda
July 20, 2020
Please note: If you have a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City of Englewood
(303-762-2405) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed.
ii. CB 28 - IGA with State Department of Revenue pertaining to the Sales and Use
Tax Software (SUTS System)
Pdf
Staff recommends City Council approve a Bill for an Ordinance authorizing an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the State of Colorado's Department of
Revenue allowing taxpayers the opportunity to file tax returns in a single
application within the State's Sales and Use Tax Software (SUTS System). Staff:
Director of Finance Maria Sobota and Revenue and Tax Audit Supervisor
Heather Driscoll
b. Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading
c. Resolutions and Motions
i. Purchase of rugged computers for the Police Department.
Pdf
Staff recommends City Council approve, by Resolution, the purchase of rugged
computers for the Police Department's rugged computer project at a total cost of
$276,550.91. Staff: Deputy Information Technology Director Jeromy King
and Police Commander Vance Fender
ii. The Englewood Strategic Plan will be used to guide City staff and Council work
planning for the next two years. This action will finalize the plan and trigger
regular updates from staff to Council on progress thereafter.
Pdf
Staff recommends City Council approve, by Motion, the Englewood Strategic
Plan. Staff: City Manager Shawn Lewis and Neighborhood Resources
Coordinator Madeline Hinkfuss
12. Covid-19 Update
13. General Discussion
a. Mayor's Choice
i. Affordable Housing Letter of Support.
Pdf
b. Council Members' Choice
14. City Manager’s Report
a. Updates for the Phone Town Hall on 21st Century Policing.
15. City Attorney’s Report
16. Adjournment
Page 4 of 268
STUDY SESSION
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Christina Underhill
DEPARTMENT: Parks, Recreation & Library
DATE: July 20, 2020
SUBJECT: Off-Leash Dog Program
DESCRIPTION:
The Parks and Recreation Commission and Off-Leash Task Force has developed
recommendations for changes to the existing off-leash dog program.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Parks and Recreation Commission Sub Committee will present their
recommendations for the off-leash program. This item is for information and discussion.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
2001
• City Council approved Council Bill No.36, Ordinance No. 3, Series of 2001 an
Ordinance amending the Title 7, Chapter 1A of the Englewood Municipal Code
2000, pertaining to dogs and cats. This Bill made it unlawful for a dog to be off -
leash running at large.
2002
• City Council approved Resolution No. 4, Series of 2002 establishing a Pilot Park
Program for off-leash dogs.
• On December 30, 2002, staff recommended the pilot program be retained on a
permanent basis for the 5 off-leash parks (Jason, Northwest, Bates Logan
Duncan, Centennial).
2003
• Off leash privileges revoked by City Council for Bates Logan Park.
2020
• March 30--Council hears staff presentation regarding public education and
enforcement of off leash dogs rules. Council asks Parks & Recreation Board for
recommendation regarding the off leash program.
• June 22--City Council directs staff to postpone further discussion on the
recommendations until Council can meet in person.
• July 6--City Council asks staff to bring the Board recommendations before
Council at the next available date.
Page 5 of 268
SUMMARY:
On March 30, 2020 staff presented information regarding the off-leash program to
Council. The staff’s presentation was in response to a number of residents requesting
Emerson Park become part of the off-leash dog program along with numerous
complaints regarding enforcement of the off-leash program. Council gave direction to
staff to take this topic back to the Parks and Recreation Commission to find solutions for
the off-leash program. Some of the responses from Council at the March 30th meeting
included adding a licensing program, adding Emerson Park as an off -leash park and
adding a park on the north side of the City (Cushing). In addition to continuing the “Take
the Lead” off-leash educational campaign.
The Parks and Recreation Commission made the determination to reinstate the 2018 -
2019 Off-Leash Dog Sub Committee. The 2020 Off-Leash Sub Committee consists of 3
Parks and Recreation Board Members; Mark Husbands, Kate Truesdale and Stephen
Young and a staff liaison Dave Lee, Open Space Manager. On May 26, 2020 the Off -
Leash Sub Committee met to review and discuss findings from stakeholder meetings
and determine a recommendation to resolve the off-leash dog program issues.
On Thursday, June 11, 2020 the Sub Committee presented their recommendations to
the Parks and Recreation Commission to modify the off-leash program. The
Commission approved the recommendations unanimously.
ANALYSIS:
The Off-Leash Sub Committee reviewed the following information from past meetings to
come up with their recommendations to City Council:
Off-Leash Dog Park History
• Pilot program for five off-leash dog parks parks launched in January 2002;
Englewood adopted off-leash parks in January 2003.
• In October 2003 Bates/Logan Park off-leash privileges were revoked due to
complaints.
• As of May 2020 there are four off-leash parks within the City of Englewood:
Duncan, Jason, Centennial and Northwest Greenbelt; Canine Corral is an
enclosed off-leash dog park, opened in June 2006.
• Dogs may be off-leash in the four parks during specific times of day, and specific
months of the year: March 1 to October 31; 6-11am and 6-11pm AND
November 1 to February 28/29; 6am-11pm
The Sub Committee met with three stakeholder groups from November 2018 to
April 2019
Page 6 of 268
• Englewood Code Enforcement; Officer David Lewis
• Englewood Unleashed; off-leash dog park clean up volunteer group
• Pirate Youth Sports; Allen McGirl, Director of Soccer
Known Issues with Off-Leash Dog Parks
• Englewood is one of the very few municipalities that has off-leash dog
parks/hours in metro areas across the country
• Neighboring municipalities are bringing additional dogs into our parks
• Dog use is damaging parks/turf, costing the city money
• Dogs wandering off/getting lost costs the city money
• Rising complaints, recent incidents reported of aggressive dogs
• With the growing population in Englewood, and surrounding communities, the off-
leash dog park program is not sustainable as it currently operates.
The Sub Committee recommendations are as follows:
• Off-leash dog privileges will be eliminated at Centennial, Jason and Duncan
Parks.
The Englewood Parks & Recreation Department and Code Enforcement have
received multiple
complaints about dangerous, at-large dogs at these parks and there are genuine
concerns for the
health and safety of Englewood’s children and families. These parks have
athletic fields, rental
shelters and playgrounds. Athletic fields and rental shelters generate revenue for
the Parks &
Recreation Department, however due to at-large dogs Pirate Youth Sports has
considered
relocating to South Suburban Parks, and shelters have seen a decline in rentals.
Eliminating off-leash
privileges at these three parks will ensure all Englewood’s citizens can safely
enjoy the
parks, and that the Parks & Recreation Department maximize potential revenue.
Furthermore,
turf at these parks have been damaged as a result of excessive dog use, and the
Parks &
Recreation Department has had endured unanticipated c osts to reseed and
fence the turf for
recovery. Eliminating off-leash privileges at these parks will reduce turf use and
damage, as well.
• The Northwest Greenbelt will remain an off-leash dog park, and we propose
Emerson Park will transition to an off-leash dog park.
It is recommended off-leash dogs be allowed during park hours (6am -11pm), 7
days of the week, 12 months of the year at the Northwest Greenbelt and
Emerson Park. These parks do not have athletic fields or rental shelters, and
therefore at-large dogs are less likely to interfere with other activities. The
Page 7 of 268
playground at the Northwest Greenbelt is to be fenced-in to address safety
concerns for children and families. Citizens that live around Emerson Park have
requested it to become an off-leash dog park for years and this recommendation
also satisfies their requests. By permitting off-leash privileges at these two parks,
it means both the north and south side of Englewood (Hampden Avenue as the
divider) will have off off-leash dog privileges, which is something citizens have
also been requesting for years. Canine Corral will remain an enclosed off -leash
dog park.
• The Parks & Recreation Department will develop a comprehensive plan and
secure funding for a new enclosed off-leash dog park at Cushing Park.
The concept for a dog park at Cushing Park was first introduced in the 2017
Parks & Recreation Master Plan. A second enclosed off-leash dog park in
northern Englewood will help disperse off-leash dog activity across the city and
allow Code Enforcement to better manage at-large dogs. The Cushing Park off-
leash dog park should potentially be for small dogs only, which may also help
diffuse issues between dogs within Canine Corral. In the remaining months of
2020, The Parks & Recreation Department will develop a comprehensive plan for
an enclosed off-leash dog park at Cushing Park, including all necessary
environmental study requirements, infrastructure needs, a project ed budget and
a timeline for completion (2022). The estimated total project cost is $300,000.
The Parks & Recreation Department will write a grant to secure funding in 2021.
• The Parks & Recreation Department will continue it’s “Take the Lead”
campaign and create content around the off-leash dog park changes.
The Off-Leash Sub Committee believes if Englewood’s citizens are primed about
the holistic plan for off-leash dog parks, they will be more likely to show support.
These changes will make the parks safer and more enjoyable for all of
Englewood’s citizens, and while some off-leash dog park privileges are being
eliminated, new opportunities for off-leash dogs are also being created.
Communicating these changes through the “Taking the Lead” campaign will
ensure citizens are aware of the changes, yield a smooth transition and mitigate
potential for at-large dog issues.
• The Parks & Recreation Department will create new opportunities for
Englewood residents to socialize.
Multiple citizens have commented that the off-leash dog parks create an
opportunity for socializing and build sense of community among neighbors;
eliminating off-leash privileges may affect this. Community park events and adult
sport leagues will provide different opportunities for neighbors to interact. The
Parks & Recreation Department will work with the Parks and Recreation
Commission to create these opportunities.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Page 8 of 268
During this research period, there have been no financial implications beyond staff time.
Future financial implications could include formalized/ fenced area for dogs off-leash
($60,000-$100,000 per park), cost for park ranger program to assist with off-leash
issues and park rules, and dog licensing software program.
ALTERNATIVES:
1.) Make no changes to off leash rules or programming. 2.) Increase staff (i.e.: Code
Officer, Park Ranger) for more enforcement of current rules.
CONCLUSION:
Parks and Recreation Commission Sub Committee has developed their
recommendations for the off-leash program for City Council. This item is for information
and discussion.
ATTACHMENTS:
Off-leash presentation 7.20.20 (PowerPoint-PDF)
Off-leash Dog Sub Committee Recommendations
Input Now City of Englewood Off-leash Dog Privileges Survey Results
Dog Park Emails PDF -redacted
CM Stone - Survey Results
Page 9 of 268
City of Englewood Parks & Recreation Commission Off-Leash Dog Sub Committee
Recommendation
June 2020
The Off-Leash Dog Sub Committee was formed in October 2018 as a result of increased complaints from
citizens about off-leash dog park program. The sub committee met with three stakeholder groups from
November 2018 to April 2019, including Englewood Code Enforcement, Englewood Unleashed and Pirate
Youth Sports (see Appendix for meeting notes.)
Sub committee members included Parks & Recreation Commissioners Kate Truesdale, Mark Husbands and
Kathy Christie. Dave Lee represented the Parks & Recreation Department. Member Kathy Christie moved
away from Englewood in September 2019 and Parks & Recreation Commission member Steve Young
replaced her in May 2020.
On May 26, 2020 the Off-Leash sub committee met to review and discuss findings from stakeholder
meetings and determine a recommendation to resolve the off-leash dog program issues that have been
troubling Englewood for years.
The Off-Leash Dog Sub Committee recommends the following:
¥ Off-leash dog privileges will be eliminated at Centennial, Jason and Duncan Parks. The
Englewood Parks & Recreation Department and Code Enforcement have received multiple
complaints about dangerous, at-large dogs at these parks and there are genuine concerns for the
health and safety of Englewood’s children and families. These parks have athletic fields, rental
shelters and playgrounds. Athletic fields and rental shelters generate revenue for the Parks &
Recreation Department, however due to at-large dogs Pirate Youth Sports has considered
relocating to South Suburban Parks, and shelters have seen a decline in rentals. Eliminating off-
leash privileges at these three parks will ensure all Englewood’s citizens can safely enjoy the
parks, and that the Parks & Recreation Department maximize potential revenue. Furthermore,
turfs at these parks have been damaged as a result of excessive dog use, and the Parks &
Recreation Department has had endured unanticipated costs to reseed and fence the turfs for
recovery. Eliminating off-leash privileges at these parks will reduce turf use and damage, as well.
¥ The Northwest Greenbelt will remain an off-leash dog park, and we propose Emerson Park will
transition to an off-leash dog park. It is recommended off-leash dogs be allowed during park
hours (6am-11pm), 7 days of the week, 12 months of the year at the Northwest Greenbelt and
Emerson Park. These parks do not have athletic fields or rental shelters, and therefore at-large
dogs are less likely to interfere with other activities. The playground at the Northwest Greenbelt
is to be fenced-in to address safety concerns for children and families. Citizens that live around
Emerson Park have requested it to become an off-leash dog park for years and this
recommendation also satisfies their requests. By permitting off-leash privileges at these two
parks, it means both the north and south side of Englewood (Hampden Avenue as the divider)
will have off off-leash dog privileges, which is something citizens have also been requesting for
years. Canine Corral will remain an enclosed off-leash dog park.
¥ The Parks & Recreation Department will develop a comprehensive plan and secure funding for
a new enclosed off-leash dog park at Cushing Park. The concept for a dog park at Cushing Park
was first introduced in the 2017 Parks & Recreation Master Plan. A second enclosed off-leash dog
park in northern Englewood will help disperse off-leash dog activity across the city and allow
Code Enforcement to better manage at-large dogs. The Cushing Park off-leash dog park should
Page 10 of 268
potentially be for small dogs only, which may also help diffuse issues between dogs within
Canine Corral. In the remaining months of 2020, The Parks & Recreation Department will develop
a comprehensive plan for an enclosed off-leash dog park at Cushing Park, including all necessary
environmental study requirements, infrastructure needs, a projected budget and a timeline for
completion (2021). The estimated total project cost is $300,000. The Parks & Recreation
Department will write a grant to secure funding in 2021.
¥ The Parks & Recreation Department will continue it’s “Take the Lead” campaign and create
content around the off-leash dog park changes. The Off-Leash Sub Committee believes if
Englewood’s citizens are primed about the holistic plan for off-leash dog parks, they will be more
likely to show support. These changes will make the parks safer and more enjoyable for all of
Englewood’s citizens, and while some off-leash dog park privileges are being eliminated, new
opportunities for off-leash dogs are also being created. Communicating these changes through
the “Taking the Lead” campaign will ensure citizens are aware of the changes, yield a smooth
transition and mitigate potential for at-large dog issues.
¥ The Parks & Recreation Department will create new opportunities for Englewood residents to
socialize. Multiple citizens have commented that the off-leash dog parks create an opportunity
for socializing and build sense of community among neighbors; eliminating off-leash privileges
may affect this. Community park events and adult sports leagues will provide different
opportunities for neighbors to interact. The Parks & Recreation Department will work with the
Parks & Recreation Commission to create these opportunities.
The Off-Leash Sub Committee believes these recommendations will resolve the off-leash dog program
issue within Englewood. As our city continues to grow and develop, the existing off-leash dog program is
not sustainable. At-large dogs are a health and safety concern and a financial burden for the city of
Englewood. It is crucial to implement changes to the program and create a second dog park. We, the Off-
Leash Sub Committee, look forward to the future of off-leash dogs within our city.
Page 11 of 268
APPENDIX
City of Englewood, Parks & Recreation Commission Off-Leash Dog Sub Committee
Meeting Notes
A recap of meetings that took place between November 2018 and April 2019
Off-Leash Dog Park Sub Committee History/Timeline
• Formed in October 2018; result of increased complaints from citizens about off-leash dog park
program
• Committee members include Kate Truesdale, Mark Husbands and Kathy Christie; Dave Lee as
Parks Department representative
• The sub committee met with three stakeholder groups from November 2018 to April 2019
o Englewood Code Enforcement; Officer David Lewis
o Englewood Unleashed; off-leash dog park clean up volunteer group
o Pirate Youth Sports; Allen McGirl, Director of Soccer
• The sub committee fell to the wayside as the Summer of 2019 commenced; member Kathy
Christie left Englewood in September 2019
• The sub committee was re-ignited in May 2020 as a result of pressure for a recommendation be
suggested to City Council regarding off-leash dog parks
o Steve Young replaced Kathy Christie on sub committee
Off-Leash Dog Park History
• Pilot program for five off-leash dog parks parks launched in January 2002; Englewood adopted
off-leash parks in January 2003
• In October 2003 Bates/Logan Park off-leash privileges were revoked
• As of May 2020 there are four off-leash parks within the city of Englewood: Duncan, Jason,
Centennial and Northwest Greenbelt; Canine Corral is an enclosed off-leash dog park, opened in
June 2006
• Dogs may be off-leash in the four parks during specific times of day, and specific months of the
year
o March 1 to October 31; 6-11am and 6-11pm
o November 1 to February 28/29; 6am-11pm
Issues with Off-Leash Dog Parks
• Englewood is one of the very few municipalities that has off-leash dog parks/hours in metro
areas across the country
• Neighboring municipalities are brining additional dogs into our parks
• Dog use is damaging parks/turf, costing the city money
• Dogs wandering off/getting lost costs the city money
• Rising complaints, recent incidents reported of aggressive dogs
• With the growing population in Englewood, and surrounding communities, the off-leash dog park
program is not sustainable as it currently operates
______________________________________________________________________________________
Code Enforcement Meeting (November 2018)
• Officer Dave Lewis attended the Parks & Rec Commission meeting to address off-leash dog park
issues
• There are not enough Code Enforcement (CE) officers to enforce off-leash dog park rules; off-
leash dog park hours are outs ide of CE operation hours
• Rabies is a concern; there were 41 case in 2018; concern is off-leash dogs becoming rabid,
spreading to other dogs
Page 12 of 268
APPENDIX
• Called to parks because off-leash dogs not under voice control, dog attacks, people not cleaning
up after dogs
• Many people confused by off-leash rules, hours/months
• Non-Englewood residents at parks with off-leash dogs
• Costs tax payer $254 when CE takes animal (dog, cat, etc.) to humane society to be scanned for
chip
o 2018: 219* animals = $55,626 (*As of November 2018)
o 2017: 244 animals = $61,976
o 2016: 273 animals = $69,342
Solution suggestions from Code Enforcement
• Education and Enforcement should be the goal
• Dog Licensing/Registering/Tagging
o Boulder Voice & Sight Program ($15 to $30 per dog, annual fee)
§ Off-leash dogs must be registered on voice command and hang signals
§ City offers classes for voice and signal command training; dog must take class
and then are tested
§ Court summons if dog not under voice command; Fee unknown for
resident/nonresident
o Registration fees could help cover cost of additional CE officers for off-leash hours
• Education campaign about rabies, pet healthy and safety, dogs meeting etiquette, etc.
Englewood Unleashed Meetings (November 2018 – April 2019)
• Englewood Unleashed (EU) is a volunteer group; mission is to support off-leash dog privileges
designated within Englewood; work with City and Parks & Rec Departments to support off-leash
dog privileges
• Formed in 2006; there have been many iterations of the group
• Organize clean ups for off-leash dog parks; host fundraising events to cover cost of supplies
• Communicate primarily through Facebook page; also have website; no member database
• Have struggled in the past with volunteer retention
Meeting #1: November 27, 2018
• General get-to-know-you meeting; talked about off-leash parks, various issues, the two sides
• New EU Executive Committee formed after being pressured by the existing Executive members;
threatened off-leash parks shutting down if Englewood Unleashed didn’t continue to exist; this is
false, existing Executive members wanted to leave the group
• Executive Committee members include Kyle Masterson, Kali Wallace, Keely Sugden, Ross
Pfenning
• EU also confused by off-leash rules, hours/months
• New EU Executive Committee to meet, strategize direction of EU, then meet with subcommittee
in 2019
Meeting #2: January 29, 2019
• Update from EU Executive Committee to meeting; shared strategy for 2019 and beyond
• Reorganizing
o EU cannot access approximately $4,000 in funds; past Executive members
nonresponsive
o Park Teams- neighborhood clean up groups, also help with education
o Desire to create volunteer database, monthly/quarterly newsletter
o Update Agreement between EU and Parks & Rec Department
• Rebranding
Page 13 of 268
APPENDIX
o Logo, mission, social media channels, website
o Business cards for members to hand out at parks as part of education
o Social media channels/Next Door to help diffuse complaints
o Goal to reveal new brand Summer 2019
• Fundraising
o Partner with Parks & Rec on dog registration; registration comes with EU membership,
benefits at Parks and Rec/EU events; EU receives some funds?
o Smaller more frequent events, including neighborhood park BBQs/happy hours, dog egg
hunt, canine carnival, dog-themed movie night, year-end dog swim Pirates Cove
o Information booth at Englewood Block Party
Meeting #3: April 23, 2019
• Still trying to access finances; need access to PO Box; setting up operating procedures so this
won’t happen again if Executive Committee changes
• Not much progress made on rebranding, slowly coming together, still expecting Summer 2019
launch
• All EU member meeting when secured finances, PO Box, rebrand complete
Current Status of Englewood Unleashed (2020)
• EU Executive Committee member Kyle Masterson moved to Grand County in Spring of 2019
• EU Executive Committee member Keely Sugden resigned late Summer 2019
• EU transitioning again; feel group is fizzling out (despite activity on Facebook page, sharing Code
Enforcement/Parks & Recs updates); unknown if any new Executive Committee members
Solutions and Suggestions from EU
• Partnership of EU and Parks & Rec dog registration
• Section of Canine Corral for small dog park
• Fence/barrier between fields and playgrounds at off-leash parks
• More simple signage, larger
• Education campaign in Englewood Citizen
• Partnership with Keep Englewood Beautiful for education
• Partner with real estate agents on “Welcome Packets,” share info about off-leash parks
• Better scheduling with Youth Sports; shared calendar between EU and Youth Sports, updated
frequently, email blasts to EU membership about scheduling changes
Pirate Youth Sports Meeting (April 2019)
• Meeting with Allen McGirl, Director of Soccer for Pirate Youth Sports (PYS); has children and also
a dog owner; used to support off-leash dog rules, now doesn’t think sustainable for Englewood
• PYS includes 4 staff members, 12 sports directors
• Off-leash dogs interfere with sports programming; hours overlap; dogs running onto fields during
practice/games; knocking children over; urinating on personal equipment
• Some coaches refuse to practice at Duncan Park because of off-leash dogs; previously dropped
Jason Park because of off-leash dog issues
• PYS encourages parents not to bring dogs to practice/games; in PYS Code of Conduct
• PYS considering leaving Englewood parks for South Suburban (no off-leash dogs allowed); PYS
leaving Englewood parks would significantly affect park revenue
• PYS wants off-leash dogs parks to end; safety concern for children and families
Solutions and Suggestions from PYS
Page 14 of 268
APPENDIX
• Scheduling between PYS practice/games/events and off-leash dog hours; shared calendar,
updated frequently
• Area behind playground at Bates/Logan for small dog park
• Code Enforcement officer number on PYS rosters; CE present at PYS games/events
• Education campaign focused on safety of children and families while in parks
Solutions and Suggestions from Parks & Rec Department
Long Term Solutions (presented October 2018 at Parks & Rec Commission meeting)
• Establish off-leash license program
o Dog owners purchase off-leash license, which allows access to the four off-leash parks
and Canine Corral. Non-resident rates will be slightly hire than residents and funding
from the program can help cover cost of Code Enforcement officer to help with
enforcement and education.
• Build Second Dog Park in northwest Cushing Park
o Once dog park opens, all other off-leash privileges phased out, or revoked immediately.
• No leash rules at any parks
o No licensing program. All dogs may run free at all Englewood parks.
• Leave current off-leash dog park privileges in place as they are today.
Updated Solutions (presented at April 2020 Parks & Rec Commission meeting, and City Council meeting)
• Continue enforcement
• Discontinue the off-leash program
• Future funding for installation of a fended dog park north of Highway 285 (Cushing)
• Add off-leash park north of Highway 285 (Emerson)
Page 15 of 268
POLICY OVERVIEW ADDED. APR 24, 2020
CURRENT RESULTS 69 Total Responses
REGISTERED VS NON-REGISTERED
ALL RESPONDENTS
Off-Leash Dog Privileges
On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate the City’s response to off-leash dogs? 1 being dissatisfied and 5 being very
satisfied.
A 1 (11)
B 2 (3)
C 3 (7)
D 4 (5)
E 5 (14)
F 6 (6)
G 7 (4)
H 8 (6)
I 9 (1)
J 10 (12)
A B C D E F G H I J
Registered Voters (41)12.2% (5)4.9% (2)7.3% (3)9.8% (4)22.0% (9)9.8% (4)7.3% (3)9.8% (4)-17.1% (7)
Non-Registered Voters (28)21.4% (6)3.6% (1)14.3% (4)3.6% (1)17.9% (5)7.1% (2)3.6% (1)7.1% (2)3.6% (1)17.9% (5)
A B C D E F G H I J
All respondents (69)16.0%
(11)
4.0%
(3)
10.0%
(7)7.0% (5)20.0%
(14)
9.0%
(6)
6.0%
(4)
9.0%
(6)
1.0%
(1)
17.0%
(12)
Registered Voters in Input Now! | City of Englewood, CO
(41)12.2% (5)4.9%
(2)7.3% (3)9.8% (4)22.0% (9)9.8%
(4)
7.3%
(3)
9.8%
(4)-17.1% (7)
Live in Input Now! | City of Englewood, CO (64) - Self-
reported
15.6%
(10)
3.1%
(2)
10.9%
(7)6.3% (4)18.8%
(12)
9.4%
(6)
6.3%
(4)
9.4%
(6)
1.6%
(1)
18.8%
(12)
Subscribers to Input Now! | City of Englewood, CO (69)15.9%
(11)
4.3%
(3)
10.1%
(7)7.2% (5)20.3%
(14)
8.7%
(6)
5.8%
(4)
8.7%
(6)
1.4%
(1)
17.4%
(12)
Register respondents from anywhere (43)12.0% (5)5.0%
(2)7.0% (3)12.0%
(5)
23.0%
(10)
9.0%
(4)
7.0%
(3)
9.0%
(4)-16.0% (7)
16% (11)
4% (3)
10% (7)
7% (5)
20% (14)
9% (6)
6% (4)
9% (6)
1% (1)
17% (12)
1 of 17
1 of 17
Page 16 of 268
CURRENT RESULTS 70 Total Responses
REGISTERED VS NON-REGISTERED
ALL RESPONDENTS
Did you know that the City has off-leash dog times at certain parks around the city?
A Yes (59)
B No (11)
A B
Registered Voters (41)90.2% (37)9.8% (4)
Non-Registered Voters (29)75.9% (22)24.1% (7)
A B
All respondents (70)84.0% (59)16.0% (11)
Registered Voters in Input Now! | City of Englewood, CO (41)90.2% (37)9.8% (4)
Live in Input Now! | City of Englewood, CO (65) - Self-reported 87.7% (57)12.3% (8)
Subscribers to Input Now! | City of Englewood, CO (70)84.3% (59)15.7% (11)
Register respondents from anywhere (43)88.0% (38)12.0% (5)
84% (59)
16% (11)
2 of 17
2 of 17
Page 17 of 268
CURRENT RESULTS 69 Total Responses
REGISTERED VS NON-REGISTERED
ALL RESPONDENTS
Do you like having off-leash dog times around the city?
A Yes (42)
B No (27)
A B
Registered Voters (40)70.0% (28)30.0% (12)
Non-Registered Voters (29)48.3% (14)51.7% (15)
A B
All respondents (69)61.0% (42)39.0% (27)
Registered Voters in Input Now! | City of Englewood, CO (40)70.0% (28)30.0% (12)
Live in Input Now! | City of Englewood, CO (64) - Self-reported 62.5% (40)37.5% (24)
Subscribers to Input Now! | City of Englewood, CO (69)60.9% (42)39.1% (27)
Register respondents from anywhere (42)69.0% (29)31.0% (13)
61% (42)
39% (27)
3 of 17
3 of 17
Page 18 of 268
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
What solutions do you propose to handle an increase in off-leash dogs in Englewood?
Fine them
Park or Animal Control patrols (Lived here 2 1/2 years, I don't think I've ever seen Animal Control in Englewood. I think I have seen a Parks vehicle once. This includes off leash and at canine corral)
This effort needs to be paired with more messaging and enforcement. Too many of the parks are seeing significant off-leash traffic at all hours.
I'm not sure how it can best be handled except to have the animal control officers patrol the parks- they are likely short staffed already which is likely the reason it takes so long for someone to respond to
calls.
Add more off-leash spaces that have broader daytime hours.
Off leash dogs need to be kept out of play area for kids - too many times I have seen dogs running around playgrounds while kids are playing
Code enforcement need to be a present and visible force at these parks. I live across the street from one and never see a person enforce any type of rule.
Enforce the current law and owners will learn to comply
Ticket owners and take dogs. Make owners pay a fee and sign a document agreeing to permanently relinquish their dog if they’re caught off leash again.
I walk in Belleview Park early in the morning. There are ALWAYS numerous people with their dogs off leash and there is an off leash dog park right there. There are often city maintence or park people
there doing work, why can't the at least approach those people and hand them an information card or something. I won't say anthing because i have been yelled at and have been called vulgar names
simply for saying "do you realize this is not an off leash park?" I now carry mace in case a dog charges me.
more enforcement, designated off leash fenced dog park, bigger fines for off leash and not picking up poop
Increase off-leash hours at parks. Increase number of parks that offer off-leash availability. Require an off-leash permit with a nominal fee and reading materials to educate about responsibility of an off-
leash dog. Issue small fines/community service for non-compliance of permit.
I think there needs to be a designated fenced off area that is allowed for dogs to be off leash at the parks. They should not get free range of the fields/parks. Being heavily involved in Pirate Youth Sports it
is not safe for our kids to be practicing and playing sports with dogs running around that could potentially harm or hurt a child. Unfortunately it appears that is going to have to happen in order for something
significant to change. I have seen dogs going into the playground and on the equipment designated for kids. I have seen dogs knock kids over when running out in the t ball fields at Jason Park. Dog poop
always at Jason and Duncan. I am a dog owner myself but my dog doesn't come before the safety of my kids or anyone else for that matter.
Enforcement, off leash dogs are being walked all day, every day on my street. I have no problem with setting specific hours and areas, but no one is following them now because there is no enforcement,
and I’m referring to pre-virus days.
Let dogs be off leash at more parks than currently allowed
Paid use of ball parks for off leash pet use. Set up a permit system to that pet owners can pay to help keep off leash areas and ball park areas clean (though residence should always assume
responsibility
Online reporting of incidents to track 'high-incident' areas, then perform patrols in those areas to spread awareness of regulations
4 of 17
4 of 17
Page 19 of 268
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Consider expanding off leash hours at some parks when the parks aren't being used for other purposes, like ball games. Fence off playgrounds to keep dogs out.
Proactively enforce the leash law. Give tickets.
Please cancel all off leash programs and only permit in fenced dog parks like a canine corral. I am frustrated that I can't take my son with special needs to Englewood parks without having having dogs run
up off leash or not under control. Bad at Centennial Park when we try to ride his bike.
Dog registration, a new dog park and no off leash areas
More designated off leash parks/times.
Those who violate city polcies/laws regarding off-leash, should be made to do community service at the animal shelter to see the drain on resources due to their transgressions. Once a month, have parks
and rec show up with buckets and poop scoops and ask people at the park to take a bucket and poop scoops and clean the park. Ban vicious dogs and dogs not spayed/neutered. Improve bathroom
facilities at all parks. Hold park managers accountable for ensuring the condition of ALL the parks. A sprinkler broken for two weeks can lead to thousands of dollars of loss that we taxpayers are then
accountable for...put up temp signs regarding social distancing and face masks.
Flyers posted in neighborhoods specifying that off-leash dogs on streets & sidewalks are not allowed.
Higher fine for infractions, more vigilance from those who can ticket.
respond when someone calls with an off-leash incident
During the COVID-19 guidelines prohibiting group team sports, it would be great if office hours could be expanded since there are no teams using the field (Jason Park). We LOVE Jason Park and try to
be extremely vigilant about picking up after our dog or anything else we find. Thank you for those park privileges!
More off leash parks
17 years ago we had an off leash park at Bates and Logan. This was great because we that used it meet other Englewood residents and became friends. We would have party’s pot lucks and the sorts.
We really enjoyed the community that this created. Because of an influx of Denver residents it got over run by them. This caused a number of people livening on and around the park to start complaining.
On top of it there was a playground and picnic pavilion that also caused some issues with dog intervention. As a result of this the City had to change the rules. Since then we have started to meet at
various small local non playground parks that are not leash free but are very small city parks. This again has resulted in a major since of community. These parks are not used by anybody before we stared
to meet there. They are leash parks but for years not enforced due to so many locals were using them. I have become friends with a bunch of other Englewood residents. Recently the code enforcement
has been cracking down and destroying this since of community. This is our park and our taxes pay for them. There seems to be 1 or 2 people that live on the park that complain about this. Yes it is their
right to but their taxes are only a small share of the community taxes that pay for the park. We as a local to the park community feel that this could be fixed by a curtailment of the enforcement and a
support system could be put into place to manage it instead of crushing the community that uses the park. We were having happy hours and pot lucks and clean ups at the park all the time now it is
unused again. By making the park leash free just invites people who are not of the community to come and cause problems. We just want to be able to use our community parks to get together with each
other and enjoy the Community of Englewood.
The only offleash dogs that I have seen are dogs that have escaped from their yards. I think the best solution would be to encourage dog owners to take thier dogs for walks and not leave them
unattended in fenced in yards all day and all night. But, I don't think that's an easy fix.
We need to be more forward thinking! Pets are considered family and is one of the largest industries contributing to the overall economy. Yet, we still play the antiquated game of one person calls in and
100’s suffer. We shouldn’t allow anyone to drive if this model really is the golden standard. The solution is to adapt to technology and use a passport/pay to play concept where we sign up and receive a
code Proving our dogs are non-threatening and obedient, where we log into an app that is traceable by Parks and Rec so that we get to go to any park and pay a small fee each time we are there. Helping
to offset the operations costs. Something that already exist for inspiration is https://www.passportparking.com/.
My concern is about off-leash dogs running around at Cornerstone ball fields when games are not being played. Some owners think nothing of taking their dogs there to run around and then don’t bother to
clean up after them, leaving a mess for ball players to run into when fielding. A possible solution would be security cameras at ball fields (Denny Miller, too), educating the community, and some sort of
enforcement. Why dog owners refuse to use the dog park by Cornerstone is beyond me.
remove the hours and turn a portion into a dog park. Most of us are home with our pups and need to take them somewhere to run off energy
As long as off leash dogs are well behaved and obedient, I have no problem with it.
We don’t need an increase. There are dog owners who don’t respect the current regulations and it would be more helpful to hold them accountable.
5 of 17
5 of 17
Page 20 of 268
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
I think Englewood has a really strong, healthy culture of dog ownership - I think the existence of parks in Englewood with off-leash dog hours is one of the (many) things that attracts new residents to
Englewood. I think increasing the number of parks that have off-leash dog hours will provide dog owners with more flexibility in being able to spend time outdoors in Englewood with their dogs, and I also
think the existence of these parks - and the knowledge that the parks having dog off leash hours is dependent on the dog owners being good stewards of the parks and following the rules - will decrease
the amount of people violating the leash rules.
Occasional drive by monitoring by animal enforcement of the dog parks. Also, community education regarding the rules at the off leash dog parks.
More designated areas with specific times dates for off leash
I would prefer that our larger parks allow off leash activity.
Increase the opportunities for off-leash dogs (more parks). More enforcement - good behaving dogs/owners should not be punished because of bad ones. Use the Oxford station apartments as a case
study. What percentage of tenants have dogs and use Jason Park? Since they opened, we have seen a significant increase in the number of dogs at Jason Park. Please consider this when evaluating
large residential developments.
Designated, fully-fenced dog parks.
Full time Animal Control response team
Add more off leash parks and increase the hours off leash is permitted. In the early spring and fall, with the time changes, it's often dark when the off-leash hours begin (mostly in the afternoons).
To Question 3, yes and no. Yes, if it's a fenced area. But it makes me nervous to walk by Jason Park with off leash dogs that may approach my leashed dog, who doesn't get along with other dogs, when
we are on our walk (even across the street). Off leash dogs in Englewood, in general? Anyone who has an off-leashed dog in a leash are should be fined. We see off leash dogs in Belleview Park ALL THE
TIME and it's very stressful when we walk our dog there. Maybe $25 the first time, $50 the second, increasing from there. Don't see much off leash activity on the neighborhood streets, thankfully.
Let them be off leash if under control.
I am SO SO tired of dog owners using my front lawn as a public bathroom for their dogs whether on leash or off. Owners must be made responsible for their dogs actions. Most dogs are chipped. Use the
chip information to locate owner and hold them responsible. Fine the owner and hold the dog until the fine is paid. If the fine does not get paid, the dog goes to the pound for adoption. Owners will take
their ownership responsibilities seriously only when the City structure/codes takes it seriously. The City also needs to do much much better with the barking dog issues. Dogs left in the yard to bark disturb
the neighborhood. Many people work nights in health care or other like professions. Again, individuals will ONLY become responsible for their dogs actions when the City requires them to do so. I
understand that individuals have rights to have a dog. But non-dog owners also have rights to not be impacted by the numerous, numerous undisciplined dogs (and their owners) in the neighborhoods. The
City needs to adopt a position that a dog owner gets to EARN the PRIVILEGE of having a dog and consequent owners incapable of considerate dog ownership.
Make the days/times for off leach more we’ll know. I didn’t know there was a particular time it was ok. I assume that means others don’t know it either.
My concern is that many dogs are off-leash in parks where they are not supposed to be - children playing, other dogs on leashes, owners not picking up their messes due to inattention to their animals. I
had my dog lunged at my an off-leash dog and it could have gotten ugly quick but I was able to jerk my dog away - fortunately he had on a harness and was not injured.
Parks like Jason that are not having organized sports activities should extend off-leash times to the 6 am to 11pm times used during Nov.-March. Perhaps colored bracelets could be used and people
could come during a window that matches their bracelet.
Provide more fenced dog runs/parks
Putting fences around playgrounds and other areas where children are present
It seems with COVID we have been able to have park rangers patrolling Belleview Park non-stop which is great. If those rangers could come through at peak hours before and after work to monitor and
issue tickets that would deter a lot of people from not keeping their dogs on leashes. Especially all the pit bull owners.
Add a fence to Jason Park so that not everyone has to go to Belleview and it would keep dogs away from the playground area. I haven't recently noticed it to be a problem however since all the
playgrounds are closed. It would be beneficial for my children to have a place to play while we are home right now.
6 of 17
6 of 17
Page 21 of 268
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Owners know if their dogs are trained or not. It should be mandatory that not nice dogs be on a leash when out and about.
Question 3 isn't clear. I have a dog, so I like the fact that I can have my dog off-leash in certain parks. What I don't typically like is the TIMES. Why should there be "special" off-leash hours?? Hear me out,
please :) I pay for the parks, too. I shouldn't have to come earlier in the morning or later in the evening. Unfair! I use common sense: If kids are having a soccer game, I obviously don't let my dog run free.
If no one is on a field/park area, I would suggest that I should be able to have my dog off-leash regardless of the time or season of year. And really, that should be in ANY park, not just "special" parks
(which is really not so special). Thanks for considering my ideas. To answer your Question 4, if there are really more off-leash dogs ... perhaps we need more space/room. Might we think about opening
ALL parks to off-leash pups? Most of us (most) are fairly good at policing ourselves and our dog-loving friends. I'm not afraid to speak up and ask folks to keep closer watch on their dog(s).
I’m actually ok with specific off leash times and places in parks. What I DO NOT like is certain ppl seem to be a-ok with walking their dogs off leash around the neighborhood.
Create parks specifically for dogs or sections of parks that are closed off from the rest of the park so that the public can enjoy a "dog-free zone". Perhaps require some sort of a permit or license so that dog
owners understand that they are responsible to clean up after their pets, so that dogs are registered and owners are responsible for any injury, and to generate a little money toward maintaining these
parks. Education campaigns would be great as well. I would love to see info that helps dog owners feel/show respect for non-dog owners, children, those allergic/afraid of pets, disabled, etc.
Actually enforce the law!! Stop warnings give tickets. Increase city revenue. Also why does Englewood not require a dog license?
I would like any dog going off leash to have a license so they can more easily be monitored for good behavior. It would be cool to advertise CGC courses and testing and highlight CGC dogs in
Englewood and create it as a norm. Or at least as something to aspire to
7 of 17
7 of 17
Page 22 of 268
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Do you have a recommendation on what park north of 285 could be transitioned to an off-leash dog park or
formalized fenced dog park?
None. The city already has a designated and fenced in dog park at Belleview park
Floyd? not familiar with other parks
Emerson park may make sense as a formalized dog park
No.
Emerson Park
Cushing - too many homeless people there as well
I never see people at the park next to the skate park at Dartmouth and Santa Fe… How about having a fenced dog park there?
none, we have enough of a problem.
Emerson
Cushing Park.
Maybe a small section of Bates Logan? Maybe at Romans
Any park if it’s fenced would be good with me
Bates Logan Park
Cushing park
Packy Romans park
Any park. Cushing or Emerson. Maybe 3 parks to include centennial
Packy Romans Park
Packy Roman Park, it is being renovated this year. Perfect time to add a fenced off leash area...West end is a flood plain grass field which would be perfect for off leash.
Bates/Logan - with restrictions similar to the other multiuse parks. Open to other ideas. Another place with a fenced in area would be terrific.
8 of 17
8 of 17
Page 23 of 268
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Sugar bowl hill or the Rosedale unpaved area.
The "wild" area between Cushing Park and Santa Fe. Maybe Emerson but only if fenced due to proximity to walking path.
Cushing park (the Open space across from The park)
None, but this is a wonderful idea.
Back part of Bates park near the playground or Emerson park or east side of Harvard gulch near Emerson street
No
Bates and Logan park
Cushings or Bates/Logan
Barde Park next to Charles Hay or even Roman Park could be utilized but being able to use a small unused park like Emerson to just meet and let our puppies play while we socialize would be better. the
locations north of 285 would bring more Denver residents into the park and cause issues with not taking care of the droppings.
I'm not familiar with the north side parks.
Emerson Park or Bates Logan.
1) Clarkson - the whole thing 2) Bates-Logan - the field when not in use or the area behind the Pavillion and playground 3) Cushing - a portion 4) Depot - the whole thing minus the community garden area
Is there a small park on Clarkson somewhere in the Dartmouth area that would work? Otherwise, a portion of Cushing might be doable.
Bates Logan Romans Park Cushing Park
Cushing Park - I think it is a great location for dogs being off leash. I also think its location will serve an area of Englewood that doesn't currently have a close alternative off-leash dog park, so I think it being
converted to such a park will bring a whole new group of Englewood dog owners into the community of residents who feel a sense of responsibility for caring for the parks and making sure they are well
maintained.
Cushing Park
Not familiar with that area
Cushing Park has a lot of room. Part of it would make a decent fenced dog park.
A park in the on the outskirts of the northern end of SoBo would be great.
No
I think a section of Roman Park could be fenced off for dogs. There are apartments in that area, so people may need space for their dogs to run. I disagree with people who think Emerson Park or Bates-
9 of 17
9 of 17
Page 24 of 268
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Logan should be. Even though I don’t live in either of those neighborhoods, they are (currently) so nice and quiet. Emerson & Bates-Logan are gems of Englewood, and should be kept that way, in my
opinion.
No - I live south of 285
Not familiar with this part of town
No, that's not really our neighborhood.
I'm sorry I do not.
Something close to Downtown
Don/t know.
City of Kunming or Romans seem like they have room for a fenced dog area
I don’t know the area well enough. Maybe the other side of Dartmouth and Santa Fe where lots of development is happening?
Part of the park off of Dartmouth near Santa Fe behind the Walmart area? Is that Cushing park?
No
Please not Cushing if people aren't going to pick up their poop. It's used a lot for soccer, frisbee, etc and that would just be gross.
No- doesn’t Englewood have the highest number of dog parks per capita in Colorado? Why do we need more? So people don’t actually have to walk their dogs to the park? Just put one on every corner.
10 of 17
10 of 17
Page 25 of 268
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Do you agree with the level of enforcement of off-leash dogs?
Needs to be stricter
yes
No - there has not been enough enforcement to date
No. I think it is seriously lacking. We live right on Bates/Logan park which is NOT an off leash park and dogs run loose all day long.
No
Yes - dogs need to be kept under control for safety of others at park
Absolutely not ! Duncan Park is suppose to be off leash from 6-11 am and 6-11 pm yet dog run loose at all hours. I have never seen any enforcement.
No, I get tired of having to pick my dog up because off leash dogs come running at him, out of control, with idiot owners running behind saying don’t worry my dog is friendly. Well fuck you, my dog is
terrified after being attacked countless times before he was rescued. Control your animal!!! Or is it legal to shoot a dog that comes running at my dog, off leash, out of control?
I have never seen enforcement so I can't speak to this
yes, should be stricter
No. I agree that the parks need to be more aggressively patrolled, and I'm a dog owner.
No there is no enforcement, most owners don't respect the rules that are posted
Nope, see paragraph above
yes!
No, though it is impossible for the city alone to enforce. I personally believe in the idea of "constibles" certified civilians with the authority to issue verbal warnings to help enforce posted rules.
I wish there was better enforcement of off-leash dogs
Poorly worded question! What "enforecement" other than dog owners being responsible for their dogs. Other cities have off leash parks and minimal off leash dog challenges. Seems to me after living in
Englewood for over 18 years...THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNSEL HAS A ISSUE WITH OFF LEASH DOG AND OFF LEASH DOG PARKS! Demand for off leash parks are increasing and yes education,
guidelines and some enforement is needed but it is manageable!
Unfortunately, so many people don't pick up after the dogs, or allow aggressive behavior. That should be addressed as much as possible
NO
11 of 17
11 of 17
Page 26 of 268
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
What enforcement?
Yes
yes, I see Animal Control and Police in the parks often but privileged people take dogs off-leash as soon as they leave the park. People are going to make up their own rules. Also, why doesn't Englewood
having to license? Most metro area cities require annual licensing to check for rabies and animal population control.
Yes. Code enforcement is doing a great job
Yes
Yes. Without enforcement, people don't pick up after their pet, don't share these wonderful resources appropriately, and frustrate others who do follow the rules and appreciate the gift of a community with
off leash opportunities.
No. I have never seen it enforced and when I mention it to people walking their dog without a leash down my street, they look at me like I'm crazy.
Yes
No
NO
Seems fine. But see above re expanding off leash hours.
No
No I do not when there are no playgrounds, sporting facilities and picnic facilities. They could handle it better with communication and work on a support system for these small local community parks.
There are parks where it is a destination for families to go play on the park facilities or have certain time slots that I understand the focus of the enforcement.
I don't have enough information/experience to answer this question.
I agree that there will always be bad players. There will need to be enforcement but ticketing wheelchair bound citizens who need to let their pets run like dogs are created to do should not be penalized.
See above as concerns ball fields. School playgrounds probably have the same problem. Someone should be enforcing rules.
No - I prefer the police focus on thefts, much more meaningful. Plus to my knowledge those getting tickets don't necessarily have dangerous dogs. I support if its a dangerous dog and a nuisance
I have never encountered a problem on way or the other.
No, there should be higher enforcement at Jason
I think the priority needs to be discouraging inappropriate instances of dogs being off leash. Obviously the need for dogs to be leashed comes from a need to prevent dogs from doing things like using the
bathroom in inappropriate places, harassing other residents, attacking other dogs, etc. But everyone also knows the likelihood of any given dog engaging in this type of behavior is largely dependent on
that particular dog. I think enforcement of the requirement to leash dogs should start with a warning for a dog off leash that hasn't otherwise caused any issue (e.g., the dog is observed to be off leash
when not allowed, but the dog hasn't done anything else problematic like harass residents, attack other dogs, etc.). However, I think the penalties should be much more significant if the dog is a "repeat
offender" or has in some additional way caused problems beyond merely being off leash.
12 of 17
12 of 17
Page 27 of 268
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Yes. I often frequent Jason park, and I rarely see issues with dog waste or unruly dogs.
Yes
I think it's too strict.
No, I have lived one block from Jason Park for 6 years and have seen enforcement there (except for closing the park). Fencing the park to be used as a dog park would also not be a solution, as it would
simply attract more dogs/owners (that are not well behaved - which is why they need a fence). Work with neighborhoods and campaign for responsible use of an off-leash area.
Off-leash dogs in Englewood have caused problems for me multiple times when they’ve approached my dog. It can be frightening. Also, once I was bitten while jogging (without my dog) in Englewood. I
worry about childrens’ safety, and traffic safety with loose dogs potentially running into the street. It seems to me Englewood is a place where many people are fortunate to have back yards where dogs
can get together for play time.
No
Yes, it seems to be working.
Not entirely sure what official policy is so hard to say if I agree with it.
I've no experience with it
See my comments above. The rights of dog owners should not overshadow the rights of those who choose not to own dogs.
I don’t know what the level is
Have not really seen much.
?
It's the laws that need to change during this corona virus pause.
Needs to be more strict, especially around playgrounds
No - I don't think dogs should be allowed off-leash unless in a fenced area. It's problematic for other people with dogs and those afraid of dogs.
The owners do a great job!
No. I have never seen it enforced because no patrol is around during peak hours. They seem to only be around during mid-day.
Yes
Yes
No.
13 of 17
13 of 17
Page 28 of 268
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Anonymous user's Opinion
Here's something that happened to me recently. I was walking by the park directly across from Englewood Police Dept. There was ONE man in the park, under a tree on the west side, reading. So I, being
a "spirit of the law" type of person decided there was no danger to let my voice-controlled dog run and play some ball. Soon after, an animal control officer asked me to leave. I explained to him my
reasoning. I'm sure you know how that turned out :) Arbitrary rules don't always apply. As more people and dogs move here, please understand that what used to work may not work now. Perhaps consider
loosening up ...
Should be more aggressive
It seems adequate
No there isn’t any. I live on a small park north of 285. There are off leash dogs here every day! I see code enforcement once every couple of months.
14 of 17
14 of 17
Page 29 of 268
CURRENT RESULTS 62 Total Responses
REGISTERED VS NON-REGISTERED
ALL RESPONDENTS
Would more or less enforcement be appropriate?
A More (43)
B Less (19)
A B
Registered Voters (34)61.8% (21)38.2% (13)
Non-Registered Voters (28)78.6% (22)21.4% (6)
A B
All respondents (62)69.0% (43)31.0% (19)
Registered Voters in Input Now! | City of Englewood, CO (34)61.8% (21)38.2% (13)
Live in Input Now! | City of Englewood, CO (57) - Self-reported 70.2% (40)29.8% (17)
Subscribers to Input Now! | City of Englewood, CO (62)69.4% (43)30.6% (19)
Register respondents from anywhere (36)61.0% (22)39.0% (14)
69% (43)
31% (19)
15 of 17
15 of 17
Page 30 of 268
CURRENT RESULTS 69 Total Responses
REGISTERED VS NON-REGISTERED
ALL RESPONDENTS
Would you be in favor of licensing requirements for dogs within Englewood city limits?
A Yes (41)
B No (28)
A B
Registered Voters (40)57.5% (23)42.5% (17)
Non-Registered Voters (29)62.1% (18)37.9% (11)
A B
All respondents (69)59.0% (41)41.0% (28)
Registered Voters in Input Now! | City of Englewood, CO (40)57.5% (23)42.5% (17)
Live in Input Now! | City of Englewood, CO (64) - Self-reported 59.4% (38)40.6% (26)
Subscribers to Input Now! | City of Englewood, CO (69)59.4% (41)40.6% (28)
Register respondents from anywhere (42)60.0% (25)40.0% (17)
59% (41)
41% (28)
16 of 17
16 of 17
Page 31 of 268
17 of 17
17 of 17
Page 32 of 268
Off Leash Dog Program
July 20, 2020
Council Study Session
Page 33 of 268
Parks with off-leash areas
•Centennial Park –off leash privileges
•Duncan Park –off leash privileges
•Jason Park –off leash privileges
•Northwest Greenbelt –off leash privileges
•Canine Corral-fenced dog park
Times dogs may be off leash:
March 1-October 31 6-11am and 6-11pm
November 1-end of February 6am-11pm
Dogs must be on a leash at all other times. Page 34 of 268
Dog Parks in Denver Metropolitan Area
Englewood Off
Leash Parks Page 35 of 268
Park Design
•Specific use-know the market and community:
•What is the park being used for?
•What does the surrounding community want?
•Specific user group and engagement.
•Sports Fields Users, Youth / Parents, Dog owners, Skate park users, Neighbors
•Areas of consideration:
•Safety and location of amenities (baseball field to parking lot, restroom to playground)
•Size of park
•Areas of mixed use (multiuse field, dogs off leash, events, open play, formalize play)
•Areas of conflict (playgrounds/ picnic shelters and dogs ) Page 36 of 268
Multiuse field
Small youth
baseball
field
Playground
Picnic
Basketball
Multiuse field
Playground
Picnic
Basketball
Jason Park Page 37 of 268
Centennial Park
Page 38 of 268
Englewood Parks &
Recreation Commission
Off-Leash Sub Committee
Page 39 of 268
The Off-Leash Sub Committee
•Formed in October 2018 as a result of increased complaints from citizens about
the off-leash dog park program
•Met with three stakeholder groups from November 2018 to April 2019
•Englewood Code Enforcement
•Englewood Unleashed
•Pirate Youth Sports
•In May 2020 met to review and discuss findings and determine recommendations
Page 40 of 268
Our Findings
•Englewood is one of the very few municipalities with off-leash dog parks/hours in metro
areas across the country
•Neighboring municipalities are bringing additional dogs into our parks
•Dog use is damaging parks/turf, costing the city money
•Dogs wandering off/getting lost. Costs the city money
•Rising complaints and recent incidents reported of aggressive dogs
•With the growing population in Englewood and surrounding communities, the off-leash
dog park program is not sustainable as it currently operates
Page 41 of 268
Our Reasoning
•Find and recommend solutions that balance off-leash dog privileges with
Englewood park usage
•Prioritize the health and safety of Englewood’s children and families
•Ensure Parks & Recreation Department is maximizing potential revenue
Page 42 of 268
Our Recommendations
•Off-leash dog privileges will be eliminated at Centennial, Jason and Duncan Parks.
•The Northwest Greenbelt will remain an off-leash dog park, and we propose Emerson Park
transitions to an off-leash dog park.
•The Parks & Recreation Department will develop a comprehensive plan and secure funding
for a new enclosed off-leash dog park at Cushing Park.
•The Parks & Recreation Department will continue its “Take the Lead” campaign and create
content around the off-leash dog park changes.
•The Parks & Recreation Department will create new opportunities for Englewood residents
to socialize. Page 43 of 268
Questions?Page 44 of 268
From:
To:David Lewis Jr.
Cc:Dave Lee
Subject:7:30 am emerson park
Date:Tuesday, January 22, 2019 7:31:40 AM
Attachments:IMG_2020.JPG
Hey there,
This is a picture at 7:30am today at Emerson Park. People are driving here and telling others it is an
off leash park. This is against the rules but nobody seems to care. Is there any enforcement?
Is anything being done about this?
Thank you!!
Page 45 of 268
From:Dave Lee
To:David Lewis Jr.
Cc:Dave Lee; Dorothy Hargrove
Subject:Aggressive Dog Complaint
Date:Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:09:43 AM
Attachments:image001.png
Dave,
I received another complaint about an aggressive dog at Canine Corral.
reported that there have been a few incidences of aggressive dogs attacking other dogs in
the park. One such dog is a red husky named . The dog owner is a white male and
they frequent the park daily around the 1 – 2 pm time frame. number is
if you need to speak to her.
I’m not sure why all of these dog issues are cropping up all at once.
Thanks for your help.
Dave Lee
Open Space Manager
Department of Parks, Recreation and Library
City of Englewood
303-762-2687
City of Englewood’s Mission: To promote and ensure a high quality of life, economic vitality, and a uniquely
desirable community identity.
Page 46 of 268
1
Debby Severa
From:Englewood Unleashed <englewoodunleashedparks@gmail.com>
Sent:Sunday, June 7, 2020 8:12 AM
To:Dave Lee
Subject:Aggressive dogs at Jason
USE CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. DO NOT CLICK LINKS or OPEN ATTACHMENTS unless you have
verified the sender and know that the content is legitimate.
Hey Dave,we have just recently been hearing a lot of reports of a guy that is bringing his two very aggressive dobermans
and allowing them off lease at Jason. His dogs have apparently attached on multiple occasions and in the most
recent incident, the attached dog required stitches. These instances don't seem to have deterred him from coming and
I'm extremely concerned that they could eventually go after a child considering the close proximity to the playground.
What proactive measures can we take in this situation? We have a detailed description of him along with the fact that
his dogs are unusual so I was thinking of hanging signs telling people to call non‐emergency if he is spotted. Is this a bad
idea? Is there something else we should do?
‐‐
Thank you!
Englewood Unleashed
Englewood Unleashed Website
Follow Us on Facebook!
Page 47 of 268
From:
To:David Lewis Jr.; Dave Lee;
Subject:Bates Logan Park
Date:Friday, May 26, 2017 10:36:30 AM
Hi Daves,
I am at Bates Logan on an outing with Craig Hospital patients. It looks like the dog poop factory exploded here, near
the shelter we have picked five piles.
I know this problem is impossible to fix, but beyond extra enforcement I do have one suggestion for Parks. Possibly
a poop sack container near the shelter might help. Sad, but my guess is people are too lazy to walk 100 feet to either
side of the park to retrieve one.
Thanks for anything you can do.
Sent from my iPhone
Page 48 of 268
From:Dave Lee
To:
Cc:Jerrell Black; Debby Severa; Dave Lee
Subject:Centennial Park Dog Complaint
Date:Wednesday, October 3, 2012 8:30:21 AM
Attachments:image001.jpg
I received a complaint about dogs fighting, running through fisherman’s lines, disturbing fisherman
and pet waste at Centennial Park. The complainant’s name is ). Any follow-up
that you can do is appreciated.
Thanks,
Dave Lee
Open Space Manager
Department of Parks & Recreation
City of Englewood
303-762-2687
Page 49 of 268
From:
To:Dave Lee
Subject:Checking on dog park status
Date:Wednesday, June 17, 2020 2:42:17 PM
USE CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. DO NOT CLICK LINKS or OPEN
ATTACHMENTS unless you have verified the sender and know that the content is legitimate.
Hi Dave,
I am just checking in on the status of off leash dog parks in Englewood. There is a lot of
discussion on Nextdoor, and I think a lot of false information.
Also I would like to know the status of Englewood Unleashed.
Thank you,
Page 50 of 268
From:Dorothy Hargrove
To:
Cc:; Dave Lee; David Lewis Jr.
Subject:Comments re: Canine Corral
Date:Friday, July 6, 2018 3:28:44 PM
Attachments:image001.png
Dear ,
I received your comments about conditions at Canine Corral. Our parks staff is keenly aware that
many dog owners do not clean up after their pets. We have tried additional signs to remind people
to pick up after their pets but unfortunately have found that these have limited impact. We alerted
one of our key community partners, “Englewood Unleashed.” that Canine Corral needs special
attention. They perform periodic dog waste clean ups in our parks and help to educate park users
about responsible dog ownership.
While a closure might be difficult to enforce and would certainly inconvenience the many users who
do take care of their pets, I will share your suggestion that we temporarily close Canine Corral with
our Parks and Recreation Commission at their meeting next week. They may have additional ideas
on how to address the problem.
Thank you for sharing your concerns. Please feel free to contact me if you have additional
suggestions.
Kind regards,
Dorothy Hargrove
Director of Parks, Recreation and Library
City of Englewood, CO
303-762-2553
Page 51 of 268
Page 52 of 268
DATE DESCRIPTION ACTION
1/22/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Unable to Locate
1/22/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Citizen Filed with Parks Department
1/23/2019 Animal Running At Large Warning
1/27/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Unable to Locate
1/27/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Citizen Filed with Parks Department
1/31/2019 Animal Running At Large Warning
2/22/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Unable to Locate
2/22/2019 Animal Running At Large Warning
2/25/2019 Increased Patrol Warning
2/26/2019 Animal Running At Large Warning
3/1/2019 Dead Animal Impound / Removed
3/9/2019 Animal Running At Large Warning
3/15/2019 Animal Running At Large Warning
3/16/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Unable to Locate
3/16/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Citizen Filed with Parks Department
3/17/2019 Animal Running At Large Warning
3/18/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Unable to Locate
3/19/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Citizen Filed with Parks Department
3/19/2019 Animal Running At Large Warning
3/19/2010 Animal Running At Large Warning
3/21/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Unable to Locate
3/22/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Unable to Locate
3/22/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Citizen Filed with Parks Department
3/22/2019 Animal Running At Large Warning
3/24/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Unable to Locate
3/24/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Citizen Filed with Parks Department
3/26/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Unable to Locate
3/26/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Citizen Filed with Parks Department
3/27/2019 Increased Patrol Dog at Large Summons
3/28/2019 Animal Running At Large Summons
3/27/2019 Increased Patrol Dog at Large Summons
4/3/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Unable to Locate
4/3/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Citizen Filed with Parks Department
4/4/2019 Animal Running At Large Warning
4/4/2019 Animal Running At Large Warning
4/4/2019 Animal Running At Large / Rabies Tag Warning
4/4/2019 Animal Running At Large / Rabies Tag Summons
4/6/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Unable to Locate
4/6/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Citizen Filed with Parks Department
4/9/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Citizen Filed with Parks Department
4/9/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Warning
4/12/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Unable to Locate
4/12/2019 Complaint - Animal At Large Citizen Filed with Parks Department
4/14/2019 Animal Running At Large Warning
4/14/2019 Animal Running At Large / Rabies Tag Summons
4/14/2019 Increased Patrol Parking Ticket
Page 53 of 268
4/14/2019 Increased Patrol Parking Ticket
Page 54 of 268
Dog attack at Belleview Park
Yesterday was my dog's 3rd birthday so I made time to take her to the park since I've been too busy
for it recently. We hung out at the Englewood Canine Corral for a while, then started to walk around
Belleview Park because she seemed bored of the Corral. I was regretting my choice slightly as I
noticed how much more litter was strewn about the park than I remembered, but my dog was still
enjoying it so I tried to do the same. We come to the top of a set of stairs and there's another dog
there, off its leash. The owner is yelling at it to come and it's not listening. I'm assuming that it's
probably a friendly dog that's not listening to its owner because it wants to say hello. Then he tells
me I can't trust the dog. I'm trying to figure out what to do because his dog isn't listening to his calls
and is blocking my path away from the situation. The dogs are sniffing each other and I think maybe
it's alright and I can continue on. The owner's not running up to grab his dog, just standing there.
Suddenly, I see the dog's hackles are raised to the max and it starts viciously attacking my dog. This
dog is relentless and will not back off, even when my dog is trying to run away. I am trying to
simultaneously intimidate the other dog into backing down and get my dog away but things are
happening too fast. Eventually I get my dog away and picked up off the ground and the other dog
goes running off into the park. It's the worst dog fight my dog has been in yet as far as duration and
intensity. Fortunately after it was over I check her for any bleeding and there is none. I ask the
owner, "Why isn't she on a leash?!" and his response is something along the lines of "Dude! I told
you not to trust her!". I guess in his mind, telling me that his unleashed, aggressive, and poorly
trained dog was going to try to maim my dog in a few seconds, gave me time to act. If that's the first
thing you say to someone when your dog approaches their dog, you need to keep it on a leash at all
times. Belleview Park isn't an off leash area anyway. I was unprepared for something like this to
happen and I'm thankful things didn't turn out worse. I hope it's not a situation I find myself in again
but in the future I will be keeping pepper spray or dog repellant handy on our walks.
6h ago · 20 neighborhoods in Crime & Safety
Thank
Reply
2
6
Page 55 of 268
, Englewood Area 3·5h ago
So sorry this happened to you. Get your dog checked by a vet. This happened to my dog and
although there was no bleeding, he had puncture wounds, a fracture and developed sepsis within
hours. He could have died. I hope your dog will be ok. That’s no way to spend your birthday.
Thank
2
, Englewood Area 2·5h ago
So glad your dog is ok!! What a fool, that person will learn the hard way if sued for a maiming,
knowing the dog can't be trusted. Common sense people, leash your dogs.... geeeeeeeeez.
Thank
2
, Duncan Park·5h ago
I am so sorry! There was a dog attack last night at Duncan Park. Two large aggressive dogs broke
out of their backyard. They ran to Duncan Park, and one dog proceeded to attack another dog that
was there with it's owner. The owner of the dog that was attacked, was able to pull the aggressor off
of his dog, and hang on to him until the police arrived, which took quite awhile. In the meantime, the
owner of the aggressive dog showed up at the park. The policeman arrived, and stated that he could
not issue a citation because there wasn't any evidence that there were any injuries. The owner of the
aggressive dog was allowed to put her dog in her car and drive away! There were a lot of children
playing there, as well as elderly people walking their dogs, thank goodness it wasn't as serious as it
could have been. I guess I don't understand why our parks have rules, but they can't be
implemented. There were so many rules broken in both of these instances.
Page 56 of 268
From:Dave Lee
To:Dorothy Hargrove
Cc:Dave Lee;
Subject:Dog Parks - Nextdoor Englewood
Date:Wednesday, August 23, 2017 6:49:34 AM
Attachments:image001.jpg
image002.png
image003.jpg
image004.jpg
image005.jpg
image006.jpg
image007.png
Dog parks, Jason park
Attentional pet owners. Would you please, as you are busy socializing with other people, keep an
ion your animals and pick up the waist. If you haven't noticed they have put a couple new signs up
at Jason because people are not picking up their waist. I literally saw a man yesterday his dog
was no more than 20 feet away, the dog did his business and the man walked right by it without
picking it up. And when I said something he got upset. If you do not want to lose the privilege of
Jason Park be a responsible pet owner and pick up after your animals otherwise the neighbors
will once again start calling the police and they will shut down Jason. The reason why we have
restricted hours during the summer is because PAT owners are not being responsible and they're
letting your animals run free all over the park and on the playground where the kids play
23h ago · 25 neighborhoods in General
Thank
Reply
16 Thanks · 33 Replies
, Duncan Park·22h ago
why isn't englewood unleashed doing their regular cleaning? I'd be asking them
Thank
1 Thank
, Englewood Area 4·22h ago
I HATE this park! It's the worst dog park I have ever been too! And I got to a lot of parks! I
purposely drive much further to avoid it. People are so inconsiderate that other… See more
Thank
1 Thank
, Englewood Area 4·21h ago
It is NOT their responsibility to clean up after irresponsible dog owners.
Thank
3 Thanks
, Englewood Area 4·21h ago
The parks in Englewood are for everyone's enjoyment and we all support our local parks. I don't
find it rude to ask a dog owner or walker to clean up behind their pet they bring to… See more
Thank
4 Thanks
Page 57 of 268
, Englewood Area 3·21h ago
Thank you and Englewood Unleashed has more to do than pick up other peoples
dog's poop. Besides, we all know the rules. It's really not that hard. I agree ,… See more
Thank
4 Thanks
Duncan Park·21h ago
ENglewood UNleashed exists to 'maintain leash free areas in parks for dogs' they have ALWAYS
had 'park poo pickup days'... the only things they DO are pick up poo and try to… See more
Thank
2 Thanks
, Englewood Area 4·19h ago
@ YES his dogs ARE aggressive! I've talked to other owners who have said the same
thing! The reason you don't encounter it is because when people see his dogs they either… See
more
Thank
2 Thanks
, Englewood Heights·19h ago
If you notice a pile that hasn't been picked up, grab a bag. I understand it's not your
"responsibility" but it's the nice thing to do. You know - be the change... Socializing in… See more
Thank
4 Thanks
, Englewood Area 4·19h ago
i do that all the time but i am not going to pick up everyone else's crap every time I am there.
socializing is a great thing for people and dogs but if your dog is running all… See more
Thank
, Englewood Area 4·18h ago
Hey , I'd like to pick up my waist, but it just keeps drooping. Probably because I like to eat.
A lot. Haha! Kidding aside, I agree with you that picking up dog poop (i.e.… See more
Thank
1 Thank
, Englewood Area 3·18h ago
, lol!
Thank
, Southwest Englewood·17h ago
It's borderline whether this should be a different thread, but while we're on the topic of Jason Park,
I wish people would quit using Rotolo Park as an off-leash dog park. Rotolo… See more
Thank
2 Thanks
Page 58 of 268
, Englewood Area 4·17h ago
Englewood seems to be developing a problem with entitled dog owners. When I was a kid I could
walk barefoot around Jason Park. Now I'm reluctant to walk there at all due to… See more
Thank
3 Thanks
, Englewood Area 3·17h ago
Englewood has 5 off leash dog parks to use which is a lot for such a small city. I too wouldn't feel
bad if we lost the one at Jason Park if having it there is causing issues.
Thank
, Englewood Area 3·16h ago
I completely disagree with losing Jason Park as an off-leash park. I go there with my dog all the
time and rarely see piles of poop. The park is good for people and dogs. Keep it,… See more
Thank
2 Thanks
, Englewood Area 4·15h ago New
My dogs and I love Jason Park and have always enjoyed our time there! I have not noticed an
excessive amount of poop, but when I see a poop, I pick it up, because it could just as… See
more
Thank
3 Thanks
, Englewood Area 4·15h ago New
Just because you don't see it doesn't mean they're not there. I watched a dog owner yesterday
excuse me the day before right in front of me not pick up his own animals poop I… See more
Thank
5 Thanks
, Englewood Area 4·15h ago New
Forget I even brought it up because everybody's missing the point. God bless each and everyone
of you
Thank
1 Thank
, Grant St·13h ago New
and , I couldn't agree more. We are SO lucky to have off leash city parks in
Englewood. I have taken my dogs to Jason Park off and on since around 2005. It is one of the…
See more
Thank
3 Thanks
Duncan Park·13h ago New
They have 3 volunteers because of how they treat their volunteers. someone in my household
Page 59 of 268
used to volunteer for them regularly, left with another volunteer because they both got… See
more
Thank
, Grant St·13h ago New
I really don't care about the why of how many volunteers they have. Not my business, and unless
you yourself (not your roommates) have had direct personal experience you shouldn't… See more
Thank
2 Thanks
, Englewood Area 3·13h ago New
, thank you for the excellent points! I don't encourage irresponsibility either by assuming that
others should clean up after my dog, myself or anyone I'm responsible for. I… See more
Thank
1 Thank
, Grant St·12h ago New
Hey , yes, I absolutely agree that the pass/fee could be a slippery slope. If that idea were to
ever be considered, the agreements with the city would have to be very… See more
Thank
1 Thank
, Englewood Area 4·12h ago New
I do take my dog over to Jason quite frequently. It does not take that much effort or time to pick up
after our pets. My niece also has soccer practice there and games. It is… See more
Thank
1 Thank
, Englewood Area 3·12h ago New
, I think the idea has merit! There are other states that charge a fee for their dog parks, but
they also have really good lighting and are open 24/7. That's really nice for… See more
Thank
1 Thank
, Englewood Area 4·10h ago New
No fees
Thank
, Englewood Area 4·10h ago New
No fees
Thank
, Englewood Area 4·10h ago New
Page 60 of 268
Bring your own bags in case. Part of being prepared
Thank
, Southwest Englewood·10h ago New
Dog parks, Jason park Attentional pet owners. Would you please, as you are busy socializing with
other people, keep an ion your animals and pick up the waist. If you haven't… See more
Thank
1 Thank
, Southwest Englewood·10h ago New
I shared the post to my face book and this is the replys I got
Thank
1 Thank
, Englewood Area 3·10h ago New
Thanks for the advice . It'll be really helpful in the future.
Thank
, Englewood·9h ago New
Dear people, I was on the Board of Directors working with the city to keep Jason Park's off leash
privilege, and secure a dedicated dog park (K9 corral). Please note, it is NOT the… See more
Thank
1 Thank
Englewood Area 3·9h ago New
I hate to say this but there is the same problem with people not picking up poop at Harvard Gulch
Park it doesn't just happen at off the leash dog parks! Also I have also… See more
Dave Lee
Open Space Manager
Department of Parks, Recreation and Library
City of Englewood
303-762-2687
City of Englewood’s Mission: To promote and ensure a high quality of life, economic vitality, and a uniquely
desirable community identity.
Page 61 of 268
From:Dave Lee
To:Dave Lee
Subject:Dog Poop Jason Park
Date:Friday, June 30, 2017 2:26:16 PM
Attachments:image001.png
6/30/17 Next Door Englewood
Dog Poop
Once again dog owners are not picking up after their animals. Too often over at Jason Park for
instants, people are too busy socializing sitting on the picnic tables. You know who you are, letting
your dog run all over the entire park and over by the playground and Not getting up to checking
and picking up after your pet. If you notice there on time restrictions in the summer and that is
directly related to dog owners allowing their animals to run all over the picnic areas and also not
picking up after their pets. Jason park almost was closed two years ago because of the dog waste
problem. Just think of the kids playing soccer or baseball on the grass. Not to mention poop
carrying major diseases like salmonella and others and when it is left not bagged and exposed to
the elements it quickly becomes a disease problem. Centennial lake is another one and even over
at the canine corral. These places can be quickly and permanently shut now so how about we
become an example and pick up after your pad. I promise you if dogs were coming in your front
yard and pooping and the owners were not picking up and you found out you would be really
upset so how about we do what is right
Dave Lee
Open Space Manager
Department of Parks, Recreation and Library
City of Englewood
303-762-2687
City of Englewood’s Mission: To promote and ensure a high quality of life, economic vitality, and a uniquely
desirable community identity.
Page 62 of 268
From:Linda Trujillo
To:Dave Lee
Cc:Debby Severa; Dave Parks; Joe Sack
Subject:Dogs at Jason Park
Date:Friday, June 17, 2011 12:24:02 PM
Attachments:image002.jpg
Dave,
called regarding issues they encountered this morning while she was attending Dave
Parks’ Start Smart Youth program with her son. She had a problem with a dog owner and observed
several other incidents regarding dogs creating problems for park users. She asked if she could speak
to you to get her comments on record and find out what can be done. She’s at
Thanks,
Linda Trujillo
Department Assistant
Department of Parks and Recreation
City of Englewood
303-762-2685
ltrujillo@englewoodgov.org
Page 63 of 268
From:Christian Contos
To:"
Cc:Jerrell Black; Gary Hultberg; Gary Condreay; Dave Lee; Jerry Barton; #Police (Code Enforcement); Webmaster
Subject:Dogs in park playgrounds
Date:Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:53:44 AM
Ms. ,
Thank you for your email regarding dogs in park playgrounds. I am responding to your email on behalf of both Englewood Code
Enforcement/Animal Control and the Englewood Department of Parks & Recreation.
I understand your concern with dogs in a playground when there are also children there, as well as the issue of dogs leaving waste in
the playground. There are no laws that prevent dogs from being in a park playground. Current park rules, in the designated off-leash
dog parks, dictate that dogs must be on a leash while in the playground, but dogs are not prohibited. Understandably, some dog
owners also take their children to the parks and they would like to keep their children and dogs together.
Current ordinances do require that dog waste in public areas be picked up immediately. Also, dogs must always be on leash when in
any park that is not designated as an off-leash park. Finally, dogs that are aggressive are prohibited. Each of these violations is
enforceable via a call to the Englewood Police Department at 303-761-7410.
There are no plans to prohibit dogs in playgrounds. If you encounter one of these other violations, please contact the Englewood
Police Department and we will assist you with your concerns.
Current off-leash parks in Englewood are:
q Jason Park, 4299 S. Jason
q Centennial Park, 4630 S. Decatur
q Northwest Greenbelt, 2600 blk S. Zuni to Raritan
q Duncan park, 4880 S. Pennsylvania
q Canine Corral, 4848 S. Windermere, west of Belleview Park
Thank you for your email. I hope I have answered your questions. If you have any questions or concerns about Englewood’s parks,
please contact the Department of Parks & Recreation at 303-762-2685. If you have any questions about animal control, please
contact Englewood Police Code Enforcement at 303-761-7410.
Sgt Christian Contos
Englewood Police-Code Enforcement & Asst Emergency Mgt
3615 South Elati Street
Englewood, Colorado 80110
office: 303-762-2379
email: ccontos@englewoodgov.org
________________________________________________________________________________________
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 1:28 PM
To: WebmasterCity of Englewood Online Form (Comment Form)
ANIMAL CONTROL:Animal Control Comment
OTHER DETAIL:Dogs in playground areas.
NAME:
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
QUESTION OR COMMENT :
Please consider putting up signs at the children's playgrounds, specficially the Bellevew
Park, with the airplane, and Duncan Park. People bring their dogs into the play area. They
are going to the bathroom in the area the children play in and one woman was taking her
German Sheperd up on the play set and slide and encouraged him to dig in the shredded
bark. I said that the area was for children, not pets and she said, "well, I don't see any
sign that says I can't bring my dog into this area." Please help! Pets in areas where
children play is short of a health hazard. Thank you,
Englewood resident
Page 64 of 268
From:Dave Lee
To:Dave Lee
Cc:Dorothy Hargrove
Subject:Duncan Dog Attack 8/16/18
Date:Friday, August 17, 2018 6:30:07 AM
Attachments:image001.png
Dog attack Duncan Park
Just wanted to share what happened at Duncan Park yesterday. A young man, his three children, and
Labrador, were enjoying a day at the park. The family kept their dog on leash. A young woman arrived with
her large dog, she dropped the leash on her dog while she was doing something on her phone. The large dog
ran to the picnic pavilion where the family was having lunch, and had tied their dog to the table. The large
dog started attacking the Labrador, it was a vicious attack and the Labrador wasn't able to get away or
protect itself from the other dog because it was tied up. The young woman wasn't strong enough to get her
dog off of the Labrador, fortunately the young father was strong enough to pull the large dog off of his dog
all the while the large dog was still trying to fight. It took both adults to get this dog away from the family
and their dog. Fortunately, the Labrador sustained minor injuries, and the children weren't attacked by this
dog! Please, if your dog has a tendency to attack others, keep them at home! There are many elderly people
that walk their dogs there, this is a family park, and the outcome could have been so much worse.
Dave Lee
Open Space Manager
City of Englewood
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, CO 80110
303-762-2687
Page 65 of 268
From:Dave Lee
To:Dave Lee
Subject:Duncan Park
Date:Monday, April 15, 2019 2:45:29 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
image006.png
image007.jpg
image008.jpg
image009.jpg
image010.jpg
image011.jpg
image012.jpg
image013.jpg
image014.jpg
image015.jpg
image016.jpg
image017.jpg
image018.jpg
image019.jpg
image020.png
, Duncan Park 1
dogs not on leash @ Duncan Park
we frequently walk our dogs around the park and are furious with those of you that don't have your pets on a
leash! it's NOT a dog park!!! photos will be taken of the dogs and owners and animal control will be called!
Their are many no leash dogs parks in the area so be responsible and take your dogs there!
22h ago · 23 neighborhoods in Crime & Safety
Thank
Reply
5
23
, Duncan Park·22h ago
Uh it’s an off leash park for dogs.
Page 66 of 268
8 Thanks
, Duncan Park·22h ago
Actually, Duncan is one of several Englewood designated as a park with off-leash privileges. Rules were
once posted about dogs being under control and other things. Code Enforcement, and police if there is an
attack, should be called. You can also report someone who does not pick up after their dog. See below.
https://www.englewoodco.gov/parks-recreation-library/parks/canine-corral-and-parks-with-off-leash-areas
8 Thanks
, Duncan Park·22h ago
https://www.englewoodco.gov/parks-recreation-library/parks/canine-corral-and-parks-with-off-leash-areas
Off-Leash Park areas: Centennial Park (4630 S. Decatur) Duncan Park (4880… See more
2 Thanks
, Duncan Park·22h ago
Check your info before threatening
5 Thanks
Page 67 of 268
, Duncan Park·22h ago
I thought that park is a voice control off leash allowed park.
, Duncan Park·22h ago
If you read the off leash rules it states that off leash hours are from 6-11am and 6-11pm. So check your
information. It's a violation of municipal code 7-1A-3. And conveniently, a… See more
2 Thanks
, Duncan Park·22h ago
Re read the info you posted. It clearly states the times for off leash. My post was done within the time that
dogs must be leashed
, Duncan Park·22h ago
Their are specific times that dogs must be leashed. Municipal code 7-1A-3
, Duncan Park·22h ago
Read the time frames for off leash.
Page 68 of 268
, Duncan Park·22h ago
The Canine Corral is the only real dog park. Other parks, as stated, have off-leash privileges. If anyone says
we have other dog parks, they are mistaken. I know the hours - I… See more
2 Thanks
, Duncan Park·22h ago
Gail in your original post you specified nothing about time frames
7 Thanks
, Englewood Area 4·22h ago
They are allowed to be off leash at Duncan
1 Thank
, Duncan Park·22h ago
Having loose dogs come at you and your dogs is just not something we should have to worry about.
1 Thank
, Duncan Park·22h ago
Only during certain times.
Page 69 of 268
, Englewood Area 4·22h ago
But you didn’t say that in the post. Also unless the dog is being aggressive they will tell you they have more
pressing matters
4 Thanks
, Englewood Area 4·21h ago
I wonder did you say something to the dog owners while at the park or go straight to your rant here on ND,
obviously thinking everyone will see your post?
5 Thanks
, Duncan Park·20h ago
They had signs posted showing it was an off leash dog park with hours. I wish they put them back.
2 Thanks
, Grant St·19h ago
Chill out ! Just walk your dogs one street over, problem solved.
4 Thanks
Page 70 of 268
, Duncan Park·18h ago
Actually, it is and always has been (since it was rebuilt), a dog park. For better or for worse.
, Duncan Park·18h ago
I get more irritated with people having parties at the park, parking on the resident side of the street (party or
no party on this one), not cleaning up after themselves, and… See more
2 Thanks
, Grant St·17h ago
Take a picture of me and I’ll be smiling since it’s legal for me to be there. Maybe you can buy a nice frame
for it. Find a new route to walk and stop harassing your neighbors. It… See more
5 Thanks
, Duncan Park·16h ago
Hahaha she reported an actual off leash dog park in crime and safety. Way to go you sound fun
4 Thanks
, Duncan Park·7h ago
Dave Lee
Open Space Manager
Page 71 of 268
From:
To:David Lewis Jr.
Cc:Dave Lee
Subject:Emerson park
Date:Tuesday, September 17, 2019 6:23:58 AM
The off leash problem got better for a while but is now getting worse again, especially around 5:30-7pm.
They are saying that code is not coming out since the neighbors who were complaining must have moved.
Can you start having people check on this? Or should we start to call again?
We know it can never be entirely fixed so we wanted to just see if it got to a reasonable point but now it’s back to
10-15 dogs off leash after work.
Thank you!
Page 72 of 268
>> Thanks for the kudos. We will continue to chip away at the issue. We also have an off-leash task committee
looking into all aspects of the issue.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Apr 6, 2019, at 12:37 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey guys!!
>>>
>>> I don’t want to jinx this but you have all done an awesome job although I realize it is still a wok in progress.
>>>
>>> I just drove by Emerson Park and, for the first time in a long time, there were children playing, mother’s with
babies in the stroller smiling and happy...and some dogs on leashes.
>>>
>>> Everyone seemed to enjoy the use of the park which is the whole idea
>>>
>>> This would not have even begun to start happening without the help of all of you!!
>>>
>>> Much appreciated!!
>>>
>>>
>>>
Page 73 of 268
From:
To:David Lewis Jr.; Dave Lee
Subject:Emerson Park
Date:Tuesday, May 9, 2017 1:08:50 PM
Have you been checking?
Guy with pit bull off leash was there and just left.
Please help keep Park safe!!
Sent from my iPhone
Page 74 of 268
From:Dave Lee
To:
Cc:; Dave Lee; Dorothy Hargrove
Subject:Emerson Park Dog Issues
Date:Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:46:38 PM
Attachments:image003.png
Your email was forwarded on to me regarding the off-leash dogs at Emerson Park. As you
correctly noted, Emerson Park is not an off-leash park for dogs. I have contacted
Englewood Code Enforcement officials and requested that they monitor the park for a
period of time and make contact with those individuals who are allowing their dogs to be
off-leash. If you can provide me with specific day and times that these individuals frequent
the park, that would be greatly helpful for us. Also, if you can provide us descriptions of the
dogs (breed, sex, color, etc), it may be helpful for the officers monitoring the park.
Thanks for bringing this matter to our attention and thanks for your help.
Dave Lee
Open Space Manager
Department of Parks, Recreation and Library
City of Englewood
303-762-2687
City of Englewood’s Mission: To promote and ensure a high quality of life, economic vitality, and a uniquely
desirable community identity.
Page 75 of 268
From:
To:David Lewis Jr.
Cc:; David Lewis Jr.; Dave Lee
Subject:Emerson park
Date:Sunday, November 10, 2019 4:44:31 PM
Hello,
We just counted 10 off leash dogs at Emerson park at about 4:20-4:30pm today.
It is worse then ever.
Thank you.
Page 76 of 268
From:David Lewis Jr.
To:Tim Englert
Cc:Dave Lee
Subject:Emmerson Park
Date:Tuesday, August 13, 2019 11:31:25 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
Commander,
Code received a couple of calls today regarding off leash dogs at Emerson Park. The property owners
are asking for increased enforcement and expressed a frustration with the ongoing daily violations
especially in the early evening. Code reemphasize to call the police non-emergency number for in
progress animal calls so that someone could be dispatched. One property owner is angry that dog
owners are being irresponsible and not picking up after their dogs. One property owner said he plans
to contact council with this concern as they do not believe enforcement is strict enough.
Regards,
Dave Lewis Jr, Code Enforcement & Animal Welfare Supervisor
City of Englewood | Police Department
3615 S Elati St, Englewood, CO 80110
englewoodco.gov | o: 303.762.2338 |
Page 77 of 268
From:Dave Lee
To:
Cc:Dave Lee
Subject:Englewood Off-leash Parks
Date:Tuesday, March 28, 2017 9:22:14 AM
Attachments:image002.png
Hi ,
The reason that there are certain times for dogs to use the off-leash parks was due to
people/dog conflicts. The Recreation Division schedules sports activities at those parks and
through the years we have received many complaints about dogs interfering with soccer
and other sporting events. City Council and the Englewood Parks & Recreation
Commission recommended that we implement a time schedule so that pet owners and
sports participants could share the off-leash parks without conflicts.
Thanks for your comments.
Dave Lee
Open Space Manager
Department of Parks, Recreation and Library
City of Englewood
303-762-2687
City of Englewood’s Mission: To promote and ensure a high quality of life, economic vitality, and a uniquely
desirable community identity.
Page 78 of 268
From:Dorothy Hargrove
To:Eric Keck; John Collins
Cc:Dave Lee
Subject:FW: Centennial Dog Park Off Lease Concerns/Animal Control
Date:Monday, November 14, 2016 4:34:33 PM
Attachments:image001.png
I’ll check with Dave to see if we’ve received any comments or have recorded incidents at this location.
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan recommends a citizen’s committee to address all of our policies on dogs.
Included in this committee’s charge would be a determination of possible investments in current parks to
accommodate dog usage. We will provide an estimated cost of fencing for this area in the meantime.
Dorothy Hargrove
Director of Parks, Recreation and Library
City of Englewood
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, CO 80110
303-762-2553
720-245-1680 (mobile)
dhargrove@englewoodco.gov
City of Englewood’s Mission: To promote and ensure a high
quality of life, economic vitality, and a uniquely desirable
community identity.
From: Laurett Barrentine
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 3:23 PM
To: Eric Keck <ekeck@Englewoodco.gov>; Joe Jefferson <JJefferson@Englewoodco.gov>; #City Council
<CityCouncil2@Englewoodco.gov>; John Collins <jcollins@Englewoodco.gov>; Dorothy Hargrove
<dhargrove@Englewoodco.gov>
Cc:
Subject: Centennial Dog Park Off Lease Concerns/Animal Control
Eric, Chief Collins, Dorothy Hargrove,
Please reference the two emails below for additional information.
Fist, I would like to thank the Animal Control Officers who provided help. Their quick assistance may
make the difference in the out come for this animal.
Second, could you provide some accident information on this area for people and pets using this park.
Lastly, please provide the costs of fencing in this area. I believe this might have been looked at previously.
If not will it be addressed in the Parks Master Plan?
Respectfully,
Laurett Barrentine
Englewood City Council, Dist 3
____________________________________________________
,
It is terrible to experience any harm coming to an animal that could have been avoided. Hopefully the
dog will be o.k., I appreciate your contacting Animal Control to help with the situation and get the dog
treatment as soon as possible.
Thank you for forwarding this issue on to me. I will send this to the appropriate departments to get some
feedback on these concerns and possible solutions.
Sincerely,
Laurett Barrentine
Page 79 of 268
Englewood City Council, Dist 3
From:
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 1:46 PM
To:
Subject: Centennial Park
Hello Councilwoman Barrentine,
I am not a resident of Englewood, but I visit Centennial Park with my dog daily. I love the open space,
friendly neighbors, and off-leash hours. But I have noticed that the section of park that runs along Union
can be very dangerous for dogs. I understand that off-leash dogs are expected to be under control in
order to use the park, but even the best-behaved dog (including my own sometimes) can't resist chasing
a rabbit or squirrel across the busy street. In addition to being a busy street the park is close to an
industrial area, which means that many large trucks use the road. These bigger trucks have a difficult
time stopping quickly.
I have seen many, many close calls over the years but today I saw a dog get hit and sustain serious
injuries. The owner said that her dog is normally great off-leash but must have seen a critter on the other
side of Union. That horrific experience got me thinking that a fence along Union could prevent future
incidents and make the park a safer place for dogs.
Thank you,
PS- I'd like to thank Englewood Animal Control for responding to my call so quickly and helping us get the
dog into her car and off to the vet today.
Page 80 of 268
From:Lou Ellis
To:Sue Carlton-Smith; Dave Lee
Cc:Jerrell Black; Michael Flaherty; Frank Gryglewicz
Subject:FW: Centennial off-leash dog issue
Date:Tuesday, June 16, 2009 2:01:22 PM
FYI...
-----Original Message-----
From: Lou Ellis
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 11:56 AM
To: '
Subject: Centennial off-leash dog issue
Dear ,
At the end of the meeting several Council members thanked you both for bringing this issue forward.
The minutes from last night's Council meeting will be posted on the City's website, after they are approved at the
next City Council Meeting, July 6th.
Council has, tentatively, scheduled the issue of off-leash dog parks for the July 20th Study Session.
City Council Study Sessions are held on the second floor of Civic Center in the Community Room and ususally
begin at 6:00 p.m. During Study Sessions they usually do not take comments from the audience, but you are more
than welcome to attend.
As this is a tentative date, I will be in touch with you once the Agenda has been set, to confirm if they will or will
not be holding the discussion on July 20th. That Agenda will be finalized on July 16th.
Is there a phone number where I could reach you?
Thanks,
Lou
-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 7:57 AM
To: Lou Ellis
Subject: meeting
Dear Lou,
Thank you so much for treating and me so cordially last
evening. Englewood is lucky to have you as city clerk.
Was there any discussion of the leash rules in city parks? If easier
for you, just tell me where to go on the city's website to learn "the
rest of the story."
Have a good day!
Page 81 of 268
From:park reservations
To:Dave Lee
Cc:Jeff Jones
Subject:FW: Centennial Park
Date:Monday, April 2, 2018 9:28:11 AM
Dave, can you follow up with Ms.
Thank you.
-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 11:39 AM
To: park reservations <parkreservations@Englewoodco.gov>
Subject: Centennial Park
Hello, I’m hoping by sending this email that some sort of action can be done to better monitor the off leash dog
situation at Centennial Park. There are specific dates and times posted as to when you can have your dog off leash,
which nobody follows and nobody enforces either... so why even have them posted? Might as well take them down.
Second, the rule for having your dog off leash is that they need to be under voice control. I can tell you that 98% of
the dogs that go over there, are far from being under control. I have seen dogs running across the streets, with
owners screaming for them to come back and the dogs continue to run away from them, crossing the busy streets,
and terrorizing the dogs that live across from the park. The owners have to run and go get them. I’m also am not
really sure why it’s an off leash area considering that Union and Decatur are heavy with traffic.
So if they are not going to have dogs under voice control, they could also have a seriously injured dog. Second,
there are baseball fields nearby as well as a playground. I have seen dogs run up to children and jumping around on
them. When the parents ask the owner to call their dog because it’s scaring children, some owners make little to no
effort in doing so, or once again, they definitely are NOT under voice control and do not listen to the owner
whatsoever. This could also result in a dangerous situation for dog, child, parent, or owner.
Third, I myself have one fearful dog that we are working on training to become better around people and dogs.
Myself as well as other owners I have seen, attempt to bring our dogs there to help train them. I can only speak for
myself here but I am very aware of the situation and make sure that I have my pup on a leash and further away from
other dogs and people to avoid any bad situations. That being said, I have encountered way to many awful owners.
There have been a couple of dogs that will literally dart over to us, so I pick up my dog so there won’t be a fight, and
I ask the owners to please call their dogs. I usually get some snarky comment and the owner will ignore their dog
and keep walking, I’ll get a half ass attempt of them calling their dog who doesn’t listen and continues to jump all
over me while I have my dog freaking out in my arms, or no response at all. Once again, not under voice control.
Now I’m sure this email will get ignored, or I’ll get a half response like last time about how you guys will try to
monitor (I never saw anyone come to try to monitor anything), or it’ll just get laughed at and you’ll tell me it’s not
your problem. For the sanity of myself and others, I really hope this will get taken more seriously. I never go out of
my way to reach out like this, but this really is an issue. Regardless, thank you for your time. Have a great day.
Page 82 of 268
From:
To:Dave Lee
Subject:FW: Comment Form
Date:Wednesday, January 9, 2019 9:24:40 AM
FYI
From: info@englewoodgov.org <info@englewoodgov.org>
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2019 4:54 AM
To: #Webmaster <webmaster@englewoodco.gov>
Subject: Comment Form
A new entry to a form/survey has been submitted.
Form Name:Comment Form
Date & Time:01/07/2019 4:54 AM
Response #:860
Submitter ID:13632
IP address:172.24.96.110
Time to complete:8 min. , 50 sec.
Survey Details
Page 1
Have a question or comment? We'd like to hear from you.
Please submit your inquiry or comment on the form below. Emails are checked and responded to
Monday-Friday 8 a.m.-5 p.m. If it is an emergency please call 9-1-1. If your item is not an emergency,
but is time sensitive, please call the Police Department's non-emergency number 303-761-7410.
I'd like to comment or inquire about:
[×] Code Enforcement
If other, please specify:Not answered
Your Name:
Email Address:
Question or Comment:
Unsafe situation at Duncan Park. Pitbulls running off leash near a playground full of small children. Three
times at Duncan Park I have had off leash pitbulls approach my two small dogs I walk on leash. Was forced
to use a taser the last time to scare the pit bull off. Please change the off leash rule at Duncan Park to
leashes required for all dogs. Off leash rule at Duncan is asking for trouble. Pit bulls are in fashion due to tv
shows and you are getting very unresponsible people running there pitbulls off leash.
Thank you,
City of Englewood, Colorado
This is an automated message generated by the Vision Content Management System™. Please do not reply
directly to this email.
Page 83 of 268
From:Alison Carney
To:Dave Lee
Subject:FW: Comment Form
Date:Monday, February 5, 2018 12:31:11 PM
From: info@englewoodgov.org [mailto:info@englewoodgov.org]
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 11:56 AM
To: #Webmaster <webmaster@englewoodco.gov>
Subject: Comment Form
A new entry to a form/survey has been submitted.
Form Name:Comment Form
Date & Time:02/05/2018 11:55 AM
Response #:707
Submitter ID:9363
IP address:75.71.42.169
Time to complete:15 min. , 8 sec.
Survey Details
Page 1
Have a question or comment? We'd like to hear from you.
Please submit your inquiry or comment on the form below.
I'd like to comment or inquire about:
[×] Animal Control
If other, please specify:Not answered
Your Name:
Email Address:
Question or Comment:
This is directed at the article in the Englewood Citizen regarding asking the public to avoid dogs using Jason
Park because of the condition of the park. There needs to be signs put up at the park regarding this request.
The park is also used by people from Denver and Littleton. The park is in deplorable condition and has been
for several months. Even in the summer overuse of the park makes it not fit for human use. This is the only
off lease park that is surrounded by homes. The other parks mentioned are not directly surrounded by
homes. This overuse has been a problem since the park was declared off leash.
Thank you,
City of Englewood, Colorado
This is an automated message generated by the Vision Content Management System™. Please do not reply
directly to this email.
Page 84 of 268
From:Webmaster
To:Dave Lee
Cc:Jerry Barton; Mark McKay; Sam Watson
Subject:FW: Comment Form
Date:Monday, February 25, 2013 11:26:08 AM
Gentlemen – this comment came in via the website regarding dog issues at Centennial Park. I had
forwarded it to Code Enforcement, but when I read the fine print I thought perhaps Parks needed to
be aware of it too.
I tried to respond to the sender, but got a bounceback so the email she gave us must be wrong.
Leigh Ann
Leigh Ann Hoffhines
Englewood City Manager’s Office
From: Webmaster
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:40 AM
To: Mark McKay
Cc: Sam Watson
Subject: FW: Comment Form
Hi Mark – this note came in last week via the website. Would you mind responding?
Thanks, Leigh Ann
Leigh Ann Hoffhines
Englewood City Manager’s Office
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:50 PM
To: Webmaster
City of Englewood Online Form (Comment Form)
ANIMAL CONTROL:Animal Control Comment
OTHER DETAIL:Centennial Park Off Leash Policy
NAME:
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
QUESTION OR
COMMENT :
In the past year I have noticed quite a few problems brewing at
Centennial Park caused by people who do not properly control their
dogs. Last summer I witnessed people nearly coming to blows over
their respective dogs. The experience at the park is very negative
because you never know when a dog will jump up on you. Today I
witnessed three men with 4 or 5 dogs off leash that were allowed to
chase and harass migratory birds. There are over 65 species of birds
that use that part at sometime of the year; irresponsible dog owners
pose a risk to birds and other wildlife that use the park. Children in
the area also need a place to play but dogs running at large interferes
with children at play. I wish you would consider requiring all dogs to
be restrained as in other parts of Arapahoe County. The current policy
is negatively impacts use of that park.
Page 85 of 268
From:David Lewis Jr.
To:
Subject:FW: Comment Form
Date:Wednesday, January 9, 2019 12:53:44 PM
Attachments:image001.jpg
Dear Sir,
In order to change the law you will need to reach out to the City Clerk on the procedures. City Staff
do not have the authority to change leash laws. You may also contact the Park and Recreation
Advisory Committee to provide feedback. The City of Englewood doesn’t have a breed specific
ordinance and all citations are issued based on the animals individual behaviors or the behaviors of
the owner. Should you find yourself in a dangerous situation I recommend you call 911 to get an
officer or animal welfare officer to respond.
Regards,
Dave Lewis Jr
Code Enforcement & Animal Welfare Supervisor
Englewood Police Dept
3615 S. Elati Street
Englewood, CO 80110
(303)762-2338 Direct
(303)-762-2335 Code Enforcement Line
dlewis@englewoodco.gov
www.englewoodco.gov
City of Englewood’s Mission: To
Promote and ensure a high quality of
Life, economic vitality, and a uniquely
Desirable community identity.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - The information contained in this e-mail and all attachments is
CONFIDENTIAL and intended only for the addressee. If you receive this message in error, please destroy
it immediately and notify the sender so that it may be redirected. Please be aware that dissemination,
distribution, copying, or other use of this information by unauthorized personnel is strictly prohibited.
From: Dave Lee
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 11:39 AM
To:
Subject: RE: Comment Form
This really should go to Code Enforcement.
From:
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 9:25 AM
To: Dave Lee <dlee@Englewoodco.gov>
Subject: FW: Comment Form
FYI
From: info@englewoodgov.org <info@englewoodgov.org>
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2019 4:54 AM
To: #Webmaster <webmaster@englewoodco.gov>
Subject: Comment Form
Page 86 of 268
From:Dorothy Hargrove
To:Dave Lee
Subject:FW: Dog attacks at Duncan Park
Date:Wednesday, October 2, 2019 6:13:26 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image003.png
FYI
Dorothy Hargrove, Deputy City Manager
City of Englewood | City Manager’s Office
1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, CO 80110
englewoodco.gov | o: 303.762.2553 | c: 720.245-1680
From: Christa Graeve
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 9:49 AM
To: #City Council <CityCouncil2@Englewoodco.gov>
Subject: FW: Dog attacks at Duncan Park
From:
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 2:45 PM
To: #Council <council@englewoodco.gov>
Subject: Dog attacks at Duncan Park
I know that this is a subject that comes up pretty regularly. However, I am extremely
concerned regarding two incidents with the same owner/dog.
On May 15, 2019, two pitbull's got out of their backyard in the
. They proceeded to run through my yard, into the park that was packed
with families, elderly, and dog owners with their dogs enjoying the nice Spring
evening.
One of the dogs proceeded to violently attack another dog. It took several male adults
to get the pitbull off of the other dog. While this was occurring, several people called
911, including me. In time, a police officer arrived, not a dog catcher. The owner of
the pitbull showed up at the same time. The police officer allowed this owner to load
her dog into her vehicle and take it back home, and the dog that got attacked was
taken to the vet by it's owners to have it checked out.
I sent an email to code enforcement asking why she was allowed to take the dog
home. I received an email back stating that it was an open case, and could not be
discussed. That's the last I heard anything on the May 15th attack.
On September 26, the same dog ran to the park, while young children's soccer teams
were there. It once again, viciously attacked a 7 month old puppy that was on leash. It
took 3 adults to get the dog off of the puppy, and 911 was called again. This time, a
dog catcher showed up. He told my friend , that he was taking the dog in,
and there would be a hearing as well as some hefty fines. I literally thank God that no
children or elderly people were attacked.
I found out today from , that the owner of the repeat offender, got her dog
back the night of the latest attack, based on the fact that she is claiming it is a service
dog! I don't care if it's a service dog! It's has a history of running at large and being a
vicious animal! Would any one of you please check into this? This dog and
irresponsible owner, must be stopped, before something worse happens!
Page 87 of 268
“Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove
all doubt.”
Abraham Lincoln
Page 88 of 268
From:Lindsay Peterson
To:Dave Lee
Subject:FW: Dog pop and dogs running wildly on our fields and owners can not control
Date:Friday, September 13, 2019 4:59:04 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image003.png
Hi Dave,
Just an FYI from Pirate Youth Sports with their youth soccer practices at Duncan and off-
leash dogs.
Thanks,
Lindsay Peterson, Open Space Activities Supervisor
City of Englewood | Parks, Recreation & Library
1155 W. Oxford Ave Englewood, CO 80110
englewoodco.gov | o: 303.762.2697
From:
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 4:40 PM
To: Lindsay Peterson <lpeterson@Englewoodco.gov>
Cc:
Subject: Dog pop and dogs running wildly on our fields and owners can not control
Lindsay,
Last night we had many piles of dog pop on our field and dogs running wildly on our field
while we are trying to practice and owners can not control them. One kid almost got taken out
by 100lb dog.
I was coaching and unable to address the owners, but if it happens again I will ask them nicely
then start calling the police.
Page 89 of 268
From:Lindsay Peterson
To:Dave Lee
Subject:FW: Dogs at duncan
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2019 9:43:23 AM
Hi Dave,
Here is the email from PYS Soccer regarding dogs at Duncan. They are at Duncan 3 days
a week plus Saturday mornings. I know they have the same concerns at Jason Park. (Plus
Cushing, Rotolo, and Bates which they know are not off-leash dog parks.)
I will send you the memo later today as well.
Thanks,
Lindsay Peterson
Open Space Activities Supervisor
303-762-2697
www.englewoodrec.org
From:
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:28 PM
To: Lindsay Peterson <lpeterson@Englewoodco.gov>
Cc:
Subject: Dogs at duncan
Hey there.
I just wanted to let you know, I just showed up and It is about 5:20pm. there are a few dogs
running through our field. I will talk to owners next time I see them on field and then call code
enforcement.
To my knowledge, I thought this park was leashed until 6pm and then under Voice command.
We have little kids trying to play with dogs running through their field.
I just want to nip this I the rear first thing.
Thanks for listening.
It would be nice if code enforcement could drive by once and a while, if that is possible.
Allen
Page 90 of 268
From:Webmaster
To:Dave Lee
Cc:Jerrell Black; Gary Hultberg; Christian Contos; Gary Condreay
Subject:FW: Dogs in playground areas
Date:Tuesday, May 12, 2009 1:37:42 PM
Hi Dave – This e-mail came in via the Web site. Would you mind responding to
Thanks, Leigh Ann
Leigh Ann Hoffhines
Englewood City Manager's Office
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 1:28 PM
To: Webmaster
City of Englewood Online Form (Comment Form)
ANIMAL CONTROL:Animal Control Comment
OTHER DETAIL:Dogs in playground areas.
NAME:
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
QUESTION OR
COMMENT :
Please consider putting up signs at the children's playgrounds,
specficially the Bellevew Park, with the airplane, and Duncan Park.
People bring their dogs into the play area. They are going to the
bathroom in the area the children play in and one woman was taking
her German Sheperd up on the play set and slide and encouraged him
to dig in the shredded bark. I said that the area was for children, not
pets and she said, "well, I don't see any sign that says I can't bring
my dog into this area." Please help! Pets in areas where children play
is short of a health hazard. Thank you,
Englewood resident
Page 91 of 268
From:Dorothy Hargrove
To:
Cc:Dave Lee; Lindsay Peterson
Subject:FW: Emerson Park question
Date:Thursday, October 18, 2018 5:12:34 PM
Attachments:image001.png
All – Please see the original email and my reply below. Always lots of interests in our dog parks!
Thanks,
Dorothy
From: Dorothy Hargrove
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 4:53 PM
To: '
Subject: Emerson Park question
Bryan,
Community Development forwarded your question on to me as the Director of Parks and
Recreation for the City. The original designation of which parks could have off-leash
privileges was decided by City Council a few years ago and we don’t at this point have a
procedure for adding more parks to the off-leash list. The Parks and Recreation
Commission, which advises Council on issues concerning park regulations, has decided to
take a closer look at the City’s off-leash parks. They have heard from a number of
residents, some of whom would like to expand off-leash privileges and others who have
requested that we eliminate off-leash dog parks altogether. It’s clearly an issue of interest to
our community. The Commission has created a subcommittee to study and make
recommendations to the larger group. I know they are considering how best to gather
community feedback and will forward your email to them.
I know that Emerson is a very popular spot for dog lovers and I hope we can address your
request in the near future. Thank you for reaching out.
Kind regards,
Dorothy Hargrove
Director of Parks, Recreation and Library
City of Englewood, CO
303-762-2553
720-245-1680 (mobile)
-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 10:43 AM
To: Community Development <commdev@Englewoodco.gov>
Subject: Off leash park petition
Hello,
I’m a longtime Englewood citizen and would like to start a petition to change one of our local parks,
Emerson Park, to an off leash designated park. There are numerous responsible pet owners that
would appreciate and take advantage of the park.
Can you send me information on the petition process or give me a call to talk through the process?
Thank you,
Page 92 of 268
Page 93 of 268
From:Dorothy Hargrove
To:Dave Lee
Subject:FW: Feedback for City of Englewood, CO
Date:Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:13:30 PM
Attachments:image001.png
Could you respond and let him know we’ll forward his request to Code Enforcement to add Emerson
to their regular visits? Hard to promise anything. I’ll check with Chris Shaw on the sign project…
Thanks,
Dorothy Hargrove
Director – Parks, Recreation and Library Services
City of Englewood
1155 West Oxford Avenue
Englewood, CO 80110
303-762-2553
720-245-1680 (mobile)
From: Alison Carney
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 8:50 PM
To: Dorothy Hargrove <dhargrove@Englewoodco.gov>
Subject: Fwd: Feedback for City of Englewood, CO
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "City of Englewood, CO" <info@englewoodgov.org>
Date: April 10, 2017 at 8:01:54 PM MDT
To: "City of Englewood, CO" <webmaster@englewoodgov.org>
Subject: Feedback for City of Englewood, CO
Reply-To:
You have received this feedback from
for the following page:
http://www.englewoodgov.org/inside-city-hall/city-departments/police-
department
The park at 2900 South Emerson, Englewood, CO is a beautiful park but is
becoming dangerous. I go there with my dogs who are on a leash. There are large
aggressive dogs, some are pit bulls, that are scaring and attacking other dogs. The
owners do not respect the rules which are on the sign which says the dogs must be
on a leash. I saw recent incidents of dogs being attacked or scared. This is a recipe
for disaster. People drive there just to let their dogs go off leash but it is not an off
leash park. Can you please help make this park safe and enforce the on leash
rules. I am getting worried about taking my dogs near there and that is very sad.
Can you please help?
Page 94 of 268
From:Dorothy Hargrove
To:David Lewis Jr.; Dave Lee
Subject:FW: Feedback for City of Englewood, CO
Date:Monday, June 19, 2017 9:38:38 AM
Attachments:image001.png
The original email.
Dorothy Hargrove
Director – Parks, Recreation and Library Services
City of Englewood
1155 West Oxford Avenue
Englewood, CO 80110
303-762-2553
720-245-1680 (mobile)
From: Alison Carney
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 6:10 AM
To: Dorothy Hargrove <dhargrove@Englewoodco.gov>
Subject: Fwd: Feedback for City of Englewood, CO
Not sure who this goes to so I thought I'd start with you.
Thanks!
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "City of Englewood, CO" <info@englewoodgov.org>
Date: June 18, 2017 at 9:40:45 PM MDT
To: "City of Englewood, CO" <webmaster@englewoodgov.org>
Subject: Feedback for City of Englewood, CO
Reply-To:
You have received this feedback from
> for the following page:
http://www.englewoodgov.org/inside-city-hall/city-departments/police-
department/special-operations/code-enforcement/faq-code-enforcement
Every time my girlfriend and I are walking our dog in Belleview Park, there is
always at least one dog off leash. We had an encounter today having stand
between our dog and a German Shepard. The owner was slowly jogging along
sort of trying to get her dog back. When I tried talking to her about leash laws she
ignored me. I restrained from escalating. Our entire encounter: Me "There are
leash laws. Why isn't your dog on a leash?" no response "You're just going to
walk by and ignore me?" "." was her reply. My question to you:
How often is the park patrolled? And, what are the odds of having patrols
increased? I'm new to Englewood but my girlfriend was born and raised here.
Thank your for your time, and I look forward to hearing back from someone.
Page 95 of 268
From:Alison Carney
To:David Lewis Jr.; Dave Lee
Subject:FW: Feedback for City of Englewood, Colorado
Date:Monday, May 7, 2018 9:16:04 AM
From: Englewood City Administrator [mailto:englewoodco@enotify.visioninternet.com]
Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 8:30 AM
To: #Webmaster <webmaster@englewoodco.gov>
Subject: Feedback for City of Englewood, Colorado
You have received this feedback from for the following
page:
http://www.englewoodco.gov/inside-city-hall/city-departments/police-department-
/community-relations-
First I wanna thank you all for what you do. Every officer I’ve come in contact with it just in
every day life has been just an awesome representative of the city. I didn’t know where to send
this email but as I walk centennial lake this morning once again I see pet owners just walking
and talking and not paying attention to their animals and animals leaving their waist on the
ground and not being picked up. As someone who loves our parks and do not want to lose the
privilege I would hope that there’s someway that you can put out in Inglewood notice to try
and get people to pay attention before we lose the privilege of our open space with their
animals
Page 96 of 268
From:Sue Carlton-Smith
To:Jerrell Black; Dave Lee; Debby Severa
Subject:FW: Jason Park Confrontation Nov 1.- solutions
Date:Friday, November 4, 2011 11:19:32 AM
Fyi
From: Leigh Ann Hoffhines On Behalf Of Council
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 8:13 AM
To: #City Council
Subject: FW: Jason Park Confrontation Nov 1.- solutions
FYI – follow-up to the previous message.
Leigh Ann
Leigh Ann Hoffhines
Englewood City Manager's Office
From:
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 7:38 AM
To:
Subject: Re: Jason Park Confrontation Nov 1.- solutionsPlease forgive me, I meant CUSHING PARK. Today I spoke with . Some
of you might remember her when her son played soccer and she was involved with Jason Park
concerns. I work with her at .
She corrected me on the name, and mentioned that the park is slightly sloped. I would love
this park for Englewood Unleashed, but I believe you will get resistance from them.
When talking to about solutions, she mentioned that they used to play at Sinclair Jr.
High. But for some unknown reason, were not permitted to use the space at some time.
The take-aways I am getting from these two conversations is that the Englewood Soccer
Association is more committed to keeping 6 pieces of real estate, and not necessarily the Jason
Park location.
May I suggest that working relocating the group? I realize you may get resistance from
ESA,but remember please, that Englewood Unleashed compromised with restricted hours at
the four parks. Surely it works both ways?
Taking away park access for either group will disparage one group while favoring the other. I
don't have to remind you that parties from both sides make up your constituents. It will not be
met with quiet compromise.
While I am a member of Englewood Unleashed, I do not represent the group.
would probably not be happy with me to learn I am talking to the "Soccer People." I think
dialogue between the two groups broke down long ago. But we are not going to get anywhere
with dog-bite accusations and doggy poo poo complaints. And we cannot just hope this
problem goes away.
I am not speaking about ALL sports teams, just this one that presented themselves to me as the
most resentful for dogs at Jason Park.
Thank you again. You are all excellent city servants who I know will do your best.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:15 AM, wrote:
Dear Mayor and City Council:
This week I had a very unpleasant encounter with a soccer coach at Jason Park. I am
writing to you because the animosity observed tells me that tempers may rise in the
future to such a level as to get violent. In my situation, I walked away, as observed by
Councilman Joe Jefferson. After what I observed and after speaking with Englewood
Soccer President , I learned that the soccer organization has bred
Page 97 of 268
nothing but contempt for the off-leash users. My confrontation is not the only one that
has happened between dog owners and coaches. I have observed others and lost
friends who have never returned. I foresee more to come, and possibly involve
persons who won't get in their car and drive away like I did. But I offer a solution.
On November 1st just after 6pm, The soccer coach gathered his team around him on the West
end while I and my two small dogs walked along the outer boundary near the fence. He broke
from his lecture to falsely accuse me of missing my dog's excrement. It was an obvious
attempt to start a fight. In fact, I showed him that I was on my way to the trash with my dogs
collection. We had words, but I don't recall using foul language - I won't say it didn't happen!
It was very brief, with my walking away and getting my dogs away from the man. He carried
on after me with more false accusations and terse rhetoric echoed by one of the soccer moms. I
left the park amid cajoling and taunting to stay and argue with them by the parent and the pre-
teen soccer players. They cheered as I drove away. Their behavior was childish and repugnant.
The coach behaved like a bully.
Following this, I wrote to the Englewood Soccer Organization regarding the coaches'
behavior. And this was a lucky google-search, because I had no idea what organization plays
at Jason Park. I had a conversation with , mostly pleasant although she wanted to
argue the merits of the dog park. I took issue only with the coaches' behavior. As a coach, it is
his duty is to uphold the honor and dignity of the profession. In all personal contacts with
student athletes and the public, the coach should strive to set an example of the highest ethical
and moral conduct.
However, this coach taught the students how to bully a 5'4" woman with two 30#s Bichon
Frises. He taught them that yelling and confronting people in a negative way is the way to
share the park. I guarantee you, if I was an adult male with a German Shepard, he would not
have been so abusive. I went home and threw up. I lost sleep because of this business.
I ended my conversation with on a positive note. I believe we can work on a way
to accommodate both the soccer organization and the off-leash dog owners. I suggested that
the city can find another suitable park. She was open to the idea as she understands that Jason
Park has some structural problems with the sprinkler system that create dangerous divots and
holes that children can trip upon.
So to my City Counsel I offer a SOLUTION. Forgive me if you have considered this, but I ask
you to consider it again: Create another space for either organization and separate the two
groups. I heard complaints. She states that the park is dangerous and a health
hazard. I don't know why they continue to put their children in such danger, but she did say
that the organization needs all SIX SOCCER PARKS to accommodate the age ranges of the
players. So I suggested she take a look at Cummings cushing Park and speak to the counsel
about it.
Is it not practical to install the protective fence at the north end o Cummings Park and move
the soccer goals from Jason Park?
In considering Cummings Park for an off-leash dog area, the conditions would prove
problematic as dog owners would have to traverse through two picnic areas to the grassy
space. I can only speak for my dog when I say I'd never get him past the first dropped potato
chip.
However, there is a grassy stretch that can accommodate a soccer field on the north-east side.
Again, I hope that no violence ensues in the future. But after what I witnessed, I see trouble
ahead. I will do my best to avoid them and use the other parks that are suitable for small dogs -
but not Canine Corral. It is not suitable for small dogs that want to live!
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
--
Page 98 of 268
Englewood Homeowner & 3rd Generation Englewood resident
Englewood, Colorado.
--
Page 99 of 268
From:Joe Sack
To:Dave Lee; Jerrell Black
Subject:FW: Lax at Jason
Date:Wednesday, May 6, 2015 11:30:49 AM
Attachments:image.png
image.jpg
image.jpg
image.jpg
image007.png
image008.png
image009.png
Comments for PYS LAX this past season at Jason. See below.
Joe Sack, CPRP
Recreation Services Manager
City of Englewood Parks and Recreation
303-762-2682
Find us on
From: Lindsay Peterson
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 2:37 PM
To: Jeff Jones; Joe Sack
Subject: FW: Lax at Jason
Hi Joe,
In the list I sent you this morning, I forgot to add PYS Lacrosse had practice at Jason on Mon,
Wed, & Fri in March & April.
Below is some info from the PYS Lacrosse Director. Let me know if or what you want me to do
with this info.
Thanks,
Lindsay Peterson
Recreation Program Administrator
City of Englewood Parks & Recreation
303-762-2697
Lpeterson@englewoodgov.org
www.teamsideline.com/englewoodrec
Englewoodrec.org
Adult Sports Weather Line: 303-762-2598 x2
Field Conditions Weather Line: 303-762-2598 x3
Find us on & !
From:
Page 100 of 268
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 10:38 AM
To: Lindsay Peterson
Subject: Re: Lax at Jason
Some other agencies made comments about the dogs during the games. Some were up by the
grounds and many times they do not clean up after their dogs. We have had kids step in poop.
A few agencies complained about the evenness of the field going the opposite direction.
However it was just a comment. Another group kind of complained about the parking but I
truly did not respond because the dogs, the field, and the parking were out of my control. The
most recent comment was when we were trying to host the end of season tournament at the
highschool and the highschool was on board but they didn’t let us because some agencies
didn’t think we had good enough fields.
We have had our own parents complain about the dogs during practice because people were
letting their dogs just run on the field and get the balls and get near the kids. went and
talked to a couple of dog owners and asked them to stay on that side of the backstop but one
man was pretty beligerant.
That’s all I know!
On 5/5/15, 10:01 AM, "Lindsay Peterson" <lpeterson@englewoodgov.org> wrote:
Hi ,
I just wanted to touch base with you and see if there were any problems, issues, incidents,
etc. with the dogs (or with anything) when you had lacrosse games at Jason Park. Weather
it was Englewood teams or other agencies, did anyone have any comments they shared
with you or the coaches about the dogs at Jason? If so, could you please email me what
their comments were? Or if you didn’t hear anything, let me know that as well.
Thanks for your help!
Lindsay Peterson
Recreation Program Administrator
City of Englewood Parks & Recreation
303-762-2697
Lpeterson@englewoodgov.org
www.teamsideline.com/englewoodrec <http://www.teamsideline.com/englewoodrec>
Englewoodrec.org <http://www.englewoodrec.org/>
Adult Sports Weather Line: 303-762-2598 x2
Field Conditions Weather Line: 303-762-2598 x3
Page 101 of 268
Find us on <http://facebook.com/PlayEnglewood> &
<http://www.twitter.com/PlayEnglewood> !
This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast.
For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
Page 102 of 268
From:park reservations
To:Dave Lee
Subject:FW: Off leash dog park?
Date:Wednesday, December 27, 2017 10:41:28 AM
Dave,
I took a look at the park reservation email account in preparation for January's "go live" with pavilion reservations
and found this inquiry. Will you please respond to .
Thanks
J2
-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 11:38 AM
To: park reservations <parkreservations@Englewoodco.gov>
Subject: Off leash dog park?
Hi, just curious if Centennial Park is an off leash dog park? I’ve looked on the website and it says nothing about
that. Today I got screamed at by a lady who had her 2 dogs off leash who charged my dogs and all I did was ask her
to get her dogs away from mine as I didn’t want there to be a dog fight. I had my 2 dogs on leash and further away
from the lake itself because almost everyone always has their dogs off leash and one of mine has a history of abuse
and tends to be aggressive when someone is coming at his aggressively. If it’s not I would suggest monitoring the
park more often? It’s right next to a road with no fencing so it would seem odd to have an off leash dog park next to
two busy roads. And I’d love to not have my dogs attacked every time I go over there since it’s literally right across
the street from my house. Thanks for your time.
Page 103 of 268
From:Shawn Lewis
To:David Lewis Jr.; Dave Lee
Cc:Christina Underhill
Subject:FW: Off leash Dogs and lack of enforcement
Date:Monday, June 8, 2020 9:41:57 AM
Dave (Lee), is this the incident you told me about over the weekend or different?
J. Shawn Lewis, City Manager
City of Englewood | City Manager’s Office
1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, CO 80110
englewoodco.gov | o: 303.762.2312 | c: 303.358.4139
-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2020 5:12 PM
To: Shawn Lewis <SLewis@englewoodco.gov>
Subject: Re: Off leash Dogs and lack of enforcement
USE CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. DO NOT CLICK LINKS or OPEN
ATTACHMENTS unless you have verified the sender and know that the content is legitimate.
I wanted to follow up in regards to the email I sent back in December. The repeat offender who got a verbal
warning after being caught red handed at Bates Logan with four off leash doberman’s continued to have his dogs off
leash at the park on a near daily basis. A few days ago, one of this man’s dobermans viciously attacked a dog at
Jason park and that incident required medical care. The lack of enforcement continues to be a safety issue.
> On Dec 23, 2019, at 12:03 PM, Shawn Lewis <slewis@englewoodco.gov> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your e-mail. I'll talk to Code Manager Dave Lewis about
> some proactive enforcement. As you know, we have code enforcement
> issues of all types all over the City at any given time. That said,
> what time of day is most common to see off-leash? \
>
> J. Shawn Lewis, City Manager
> City of Englewood | City Manager’s Office
> 1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, CO 80110 englewoodco.gov | o:
> 303.762.2312 | c: 303.358.4139
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2019 11:50 AM
> To: Shawn Lewis <SLewis@englewoodco.gov>
> Subject: Off leash Dogs and lack of enforcement
>
> Hi Shawn,
>
> I’m writing you today because I don’t know any other way to address this issue. There is an off leash dog
problem at Bates Logan Park. Nine times out of ten if I got there, there is at least one dog off leash, today there
Page 104 of 268
were nine.
>
> While I love dogs (I have two of my own) but I cannot walk safely through the park when there are dogs off leash
due to the fact that both of my dogs are rescues and both had questionable pasts and both are leash reactive. They
are good dogs but I can’t risk being approached by an off leash dog because if I do, I’m risking a fight. Since there is
a leash law, I should be able to walk through the park, but I can’t because there are so many people who regularly
ignore the law.
>
> I’ve tried talking directly to people with off leash dogs and they always tell me that they know about the law and
it’s clear that they don’t care.I decided to stop trying to reason with people and simply call Animal Control instead.
I have called animal control three times over the last week or two about off leash dogs at Bates Logan and the
people I’ve called about are regulars, repeat offenders. They are there every single day.
>
> The first time animal control came just after the off leash dogs left. The second time no one came as far as I know
(I was told by the dispatcher that I was the second person who had called). I called today and they arrived and gave a
verbal warning to a man who was there with his four off leash Doberman pinchers, not ticket. He’s there every
single day and is well aware of the leash law. I bet he’ll be back tomorrow.
>
> I’m wondering what we as citizens need to do to help with this problem. It doesn’t seem like anything we do,
including calling works. It’s a constant issue and it’s a safety issue as well as a quality of life issue. Any ideas on
why the leash laws can’t be enforced?
>
> Thanks,
>
> District 1
>
>
Page 105 of 268
From:Lindsay Peterson
To:Dave Lee
Subject:FW: Off leash dogs
Date:Sunday, May 31, 2020 9:35:58 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
Not sure if this needs to be passed along to Code or Parks & Rec Commission?
I replied back to him with thanks for letting us know, we’ll continue to look into it, etc.
Thanks,
Lindsay Peterson, Open Space Activities Supervisor
City of Englewood | Parks, Recreation & Library
1155 W. Oxford Ave Englewood, CO 80110
englewoodco.gov | o: 303.762.2697
From:
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2020 12:18 PM
To: Lindsay Peterson <lpeterson@Englewoodco.gov>
Subject: Off leash dogs
USE CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. DO NOT CLICK LINKS or OPEN
ATTACHMENTS unless you have verified the sender and know that the content is legitimate.
Hi Lindsay,
I live across the street from centennial park. In the three years I've lived here, I can say I've seen 2 or
3 people with voice control of their dogs.
Dogs off leash are usually in the range of 20 to literally 100 yards away from their owners.
If the city is looking for revenue you won't be disappointed. Theres no shortage of violations here.
The owners never even see where their dog poops when theyre that far away. Id love to see it
become a leashed park since nobody has control of their dog(which is if particular concern with
covid), but Id settle for some enforcement of the rules. Appreciate any help.
A decent size park becomes pretty small when 3 or four people have dogs that far away. Not to
mention nobody respects these times.
· March 1 - October 31 • 6-11AM & 6-11PM
· November 1 - February 28/29 • 6AM-11PM
Thanks.
Page 106 of 268
From:Dave Parks
To:Bob Leonard; Joe Sack
Cc:Dave Lee
Subject:FW: t ball
Date:Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:28:17 AM
Please see the message below regarding dogs at Jason Park during our tee ball program (M/W 5:30-
7:30pm). Isn’t there an agreement about their use of the park during our organized programs??
Dave Parks
Program Administrator - Youth Sports
City of Englewood
1155 W. Oxford Ave.
Englewood, CO 80110
Phone - 303-762-2697
Fax - 303-762-2688
From:
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 7:00 AM
To: Dave Parks
Subject: t ballHI Dave,
I'm the mother of and , on the team, M&W nights. I'm having a few
problems and hope you can help me. One of the problems is that my daughter, who turned 4 in
March, is just not mature enough for the sport. I don't know if it is too much for her with other
things we have going on this summer, or just a lack of interest--but she won't stay in practice
& is really more disruptive than participatory. I am bringing the kids, along with my infant,
alone all summer because my hubby is working on M&W nights. Is there any way I can get a
refund for her registration and just pull her out--possibly leave her with a neighbor? I was so
fried last night that I had serious thoughts about quitting, entirely!
The other problem I have are the off-leash dogs. Is the park open to off-leash dogs during
youth t-ball? Last year, I guess I noticed it but had someone there helping me with my kids
and felt a bit more secure. Now it feels so unsafe to me. Last week, a strange dog came right
up to my 7 week old--who was lying right next to me on a blanket. Later, I saw several men
trying to corral this dog. Last night, a man was throwing balls against the brick picnic shelter
wall with 2 dogs that were well-trained, but got into several scuffles and the man even had to
tell children not to come near because the dogs "don't like children." I think the dog-kid
situation is an accident waiting to happen. It will only take one bite, or attack and then--well,
you know the nightmares that follow.... I don't know if you have any pull on this, or if the City
of Englewood Police should help enforce a leash law when youth sports are held there??
Thanks for your time. I know you are a busy man and I appreciate your consideration!
Page 107 of 268
From:Lindsay Peterson
To:Dave Lee
Subject:FW: Top post: Jason Park - Crazy Soccer Coach
Date:Thursday, September 26, 2019 2:50:20 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image006.png
image007.png
image008.png
image009.png
Hi Dave,
Looks like there was an incident with a dog and a PYS child at Jason Park last night. This is
the same coach that had to leave Cushing Park after one practice due to the homeless
population.
Is there any movement or updates with the Parks & Recreation Commission and the off-
leash task force? Something needs to change.
Thanks,
Lindsay Peterson, Open Space Activities Supervisor
City of Englewood | Parks, Recreation & Library
1155 W. Oxford Ave Englewood, CO 80110
englewoodco.gov | o: 303.762.2697
From: Nextdoor Digest <no-reply@rs.email.nextdoor.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 2:27 PM
To: Lindsay Peterson <lpeterson@Englewoodco.gov>
Subject: Top post: Jason Park -
Hello to the great dog owners out there who walk their dogs at Jason Park. Truly, I am not
against you. I am a dog owner myself and do love dogs. My goals is to share the park and be a
good neighbor during offleash dog hours. I did call code enforcement on Wednesday 9/25, and
here is why. A boy and father were harassed again and again this evening by an overly
friendly dog. I believe the dog meant no harm, but unfortunately through the eyes of a 6 year
old he felt helpless, with no escape and scared. His soccer ball was ruined, and the dog
scratched him on the face. Where were the owners? No where to be found. This should
infuriate all the good dog owners who are attentive to their dogs. I witnessed this same dog
knock down and scratch the face of two other children two weeks earlier. My first hope was to
have a conversation with the dog owners to see if we could get to a solution. They were not
open to any kind of discussion to get on the same page. Even it were not their dog (it was their
dog) a young boy was harmed tonight by a dog with absentee owners. I have players and
siblings of players walking in and out of soccer practice who are very nervous around the
dogs, even the very nice ones. So yes, I will escort them, and yes, I will shoo dogs away to
help them feel more safe. If trying to help my soccer players and families feel safe makes me a
crazy soccer coach then I will have to live up to that title. I appreciate the support I have
already gotten from dog owners. I appreciate how 99.99% of you want to be great neighbors
and share the park. It can't be 100% with this one absentee owner.....oh yeah, and that guy who
threatened to punch me in the face last week when I shooed his dogs away from two of my
players. I guess it is 99.98%.
Nextdoor Englewood Area 4
Today's top poss
Jason Park - Crazy Soccer Coach
Englewood | Hello to the great dog owners out there who
walk their dogs at Jason Park. Truly, I am not agains you. I... See more
Page 108 of 268
19 18 Las reply 21 min ago
Is Bellevue closed between Huron and Broadway
, Southwes Englewood | I have seen more cars coming down Huron in the
las 15 mins. Even an RTD bus. I'm not sure if it's... See more
2 3 Las reply 3 hr ago
Fas Food
, Englewood Area 3 | Went to McDonald's today. There is a
who works there. He is awesome. He smiled... See more
4 0 15 hr ago
Swamp Cooler Weatherization
, Englewood Area 2 | I have been put in charge of getting this done this
year so I guess I better get it fgured out!... See more
0 3 Las reply 1 hr ago
Page 109 of 268
weeding/gardening
Southwes Englewood | Hello! My name is and I am wondering if
anyone would like any help around the garden? I... See more
1 2 Las reply 20 hr ago
*** MISSING DOG ***
Englewood Area 1 | Hi again! This is a better pic of my missing
maltipoo. She’s a small white longish fufy haired maltese... See more
2 0 10 hr ago
News & Info
· Remodeling company
· ISO moving boxes today!
· Salsa for sale!!!
Recommendations
· Designer/Architect
· Need move-out cleaning Monday
· Apple airpods
In the News
· Englewood is Talk n' Trash Open House Reminder
Replies
· Found Parakeet Easman and Lincoln
· Any thoughts are appreciated.
· Advice for hiring a pet sitter.
· Dog Rescue Meet Up - Firs Meeting 10/16 at 6:30 PM
· Doggie nail trimming
· DIRTY BROWN WATER
· egg cartons
Page 110 of 268
· Help w/cleaning out gutters
· Brix Apartments
· CITY COUNCIL DEBATES
· Wayfair Ads in for Sale Section
· LOST DOG
· Cardboard
· Package for Jermie
· Plumbing
· Small bathroom tile project
· Englewood Home for Rent
· Flooding im basement
· Help Moving a washer and dryer
· Licensed and bonded remodeling
Real Esate
$450,000 · 2 bds · 1.0 ba
Open · Sat 10AM-12PM
$2,885,000 · 5 bds · 5.0 ba
Open · Oct 21
$600,000 · 2 bds · 3.0 ba
Open · Oct 20
SPONSORED BY
~ REALTOR, SRES, MAT, Broker/Co-Owner at RE/MAX of
Cherry Creek
RE/MAX of Cherry Creek
See more open houses
See more open houses
For Sale & Free
See 6 more items
See 6 more items
Ofers
Senior Discount Month
Lakewood Veterinary Hospital
65 neighbors interesed
Page 111 of 268
25% Of Home Laundry Concierge Wash, Dry, & Fold
22 neighbors interesed
Free Diagnosic and Esimate 7 Days A Week
103 neighbors interesed
See more ofers
See more ofers
Upcoming Events
THIS WEEK
· Englewood High School Homecoming · Sep 26
THIS WEEKEND
· Free White Lotus Tantra Workshops · Sep 28
MORE EVENTS
· Uneathering Antique Bottles · Sep 30
This message is intended for Unsubscribe here. Nextdoor, 875 Stevenson Street,
Suite 700, San Francisco, CA 94103
Page 112 of 268
From:Lindsay Peterson
To:Dave Lee
Subject:FW: WebTrac Comments Concerning Duncan Park
Date:Wednesday, October 2, 2019 2:20:57 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image003.png
image005.png
Hi Dave,
This one is from a dog owner about kids soccer trash at Duncan.
Thanks,
Lindsay Peterson, Open Space Activities Supervisor
City of Englewood | Parks, Recreation & Library
1155 W. Oxford Ave Englewood, CO 80110
englewoodco.gov | o: 303.762.2697
From: Lindsay Peterson
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 9:04 AM
To:
Subject: RE: WebTrac Comments Concerning Duncan Park
Hi ,
Thank you for your email and for bringing the excess trash at Duncan to our attention. I
have reached out to all the user groups at all the fields and parks and reminded them to
clean up after themselves and ensure the trash is in the trash cans before they leave. I’m
also going to reach out to All Souls School since I know they frequent the park often due to
their proximity to the park.
I also want to thank you for your commitment to cleaning up dog waste at Duncan, I know
that goes a long way for all the park users and is greatly appreciated.
Thank you and let me know if there are any questions or anything you’d like to discuss
further. I hope you enjoy your day!
Lindsay Peterson, Open Space Activities Supervisor
City of Englewood | Parks, Recreation & Library
1155 W. Oxford Ave Englewood, CO 80110
englewoodco.gov | o: 303.762.2697
From:
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 7:23 PM
To: ERC <ERC@Englewoodco.gov>
Subject: WebTrac Comments
This WebTrac customer has sent a message for your consideration:
Name:
Household ID:
Please reply via: Email
Email Address:
Phone Number:
Comments: Duncan Park has a lot of trash in the form of kid snack trash almost every
morning after known soccer practices and games. It is disappointing that the dog clean
ups aim to remove dog waste but soccer does not have something similar. I do my best
to clean what I can while using the park in the morning and want to make a formal
complaint against the soccer parents who could do better with making sure the children
clean up. I???ve lived in the neighborhood for three years and notice this trend around
soccer season, I hope this raises awareness.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. This is an automated email sent to you by the
Page 113 of 268
WebTrac system.
Page 114 of 268
From:Dave Lee
To:Dave Lee
Subject:Jason Dog Attack June 2020
Date:Monday, June 8, 2020 6:00:22 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.jpg
image003.jpg
image004.png
image005.png
Southwest Englewood • 1 day ago
· · Jason Park dog attack. My dog was attacked yesterday at Jason Park. As my dog
turned to leave, this dog (Doberman) attacked him from behind. The night before a young
man told me to be aware of those two Dobermans because they came after his dog. He
believed they were being trained to attack. If you see him at any Park, be aware. This man
is not allowed to be at Jason Park as I was told by Animal Control until he goes to court. I
Page 115 of 268
have reported this information to the police.
Dave Lee, Open Space Manager
City of Englewood | Parks, Recreation, Library and Golf
1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, CO 80110
englewoodco.gov | o: 303.762.2687
Page 116 of 268
From:Dave Lee
To:Dave Lee
Subject:Off-leash Dog Complaint
Date:Monday, February 4, 2013 8:37:14 AM
Attachments:image001.jpg
I received a voice mail complaint from a woman who didn’t leave her name or number this morning.
She was complaining about dogs off leash in the park area outside of Canine Corral. She had a baby
stroller and dogs were approaching the stroller off leash. She said something to the owner who gave
her a smart reply. she asked us to enforce the leash laws.
Dave Lee
Open Space Manager
Department of Parks & Recreation
City of Englewood
303-762-2687
Page 117 of 268
From:David Lewis Jr.
To:Alison Carney
Cc:Dave Lee
Subject:Re: Comment Form
Date:Friday, April 6, 2018 4:16:44 PM
Alison and Dave,
We will do extra patrols as time allows.
Dave Lewis Jr
Code Enforcement Supervisor
Englewood Police Dept
3615 S. Elati Street
Englewood, CO 80110
(303)762-2338 Direct
(303)-762-2335 Code Enforcement Line
dlewis@englewoodco.gov
www.englewoodco.gov
On Apr 6, 2018, at 4:15 PM, Alison Carney <acarney@Englewoodco.gov> wrote:
Hi guys,
I’m not sure exactly which department this should go to.
Thanks,
Alison
From: info@englewoodgov.org [mailto:info@englewoodgov.org]
Sent: Friday, April 6, 2018 3:51 PM
To: #Webmaster <webmaster@englewoodco.gov>
Subject: Comment Form
A new entry to a form/survey has been submitted.
Form Name:Comment Form
Date & Time:04/06/2018 3:50 PM
Response #:735
Submitter ID:10513
IP address:170.188.5.33
Time to complete:2 min. , 20 sec.
Survey Details
Page 1
Have a question or comment? We'd like to hear from you.
Page 118 of 268
Please submit your inquiry or comment on the form below. Emails are checked and
responded to Monday-Friday 8 a.m.-5 p.m. If it is an emergency please call 9-1-1. If your
item is not an emergency, but is time sensitive, please call the Police Department's non-
emergency number 303-761-7410.
I'd like to comment or inquire about:
[×] Code Enforcement
If other, please specify:Not answered
Your Name:
Email Address:
Question or Comment:
Emerson Park is used as a dog park and it has gotten to a point where there are always so
many dogs running off leash that the owner's can't keep track of/don't care when their dog
poops to pick it up. It is no longer a family park and the leash law needs to be enforced. If
people don't pick up after their dogs and adhere to the leash laws, it ruins places for those
of us that do.
Thank you,
City of Englewood, Colorado
This is an automated message generated by the Vision Content Management System™. Please do
not reply directly to this email.
Page 119 of 268
From:
To:Dave Lee
Subject:RE: Dog Complaint
Date:Wednesday, December 27, 2017 2:16:12 PM
A message was left with today, 12/27. FYI
I will let you know if/when she calls back and any info I may get.
From: Dave Lee
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2017 4:16 PM
To:
Subject: Fwd: Dog Complaint
- Dave
Begin forwarded message:
From: Eric Keck <ekeck@Englewoodco.gov>
Date: December 23, 2017 at 8:38:17 AM MST
To: Dave Lee <dlee@Englewoodco.gov>
Subject: Re: Dog Complaint
Thank you
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 23, 2017, at 08:30, Dave Lee <dlee@Englewoodco.gov>
wrote:
Eric,
I will give a call and what we can do for her.
Thanks for passing this along to me.
- Dave
On Dec 22, 2017, at 9:11 PM, Eric Keck
<ekeck@Englewoodco.gov> wrote:
Dave:
sent me a citizen complaint about off
leash dogs at Centennial Park. Could you please call this
woman and manage it?
“FYI complaint about off leash signs at centennial park
and request for Englewood unleashed to do more psa on
rules from ”
Thank you.
Eric k
Sent from my iPhone
Page 120 of 268
From:David Lewis Jr.
To:
Subject:RE: Dog Issues at Emerson Park
Date:Tuesday, April 11, 2017 2:00:21 PM
Attachments:image001.jpg
Dear ,
I am sorry to hear that you have encountered some less than responsible citizens. We have this park on
our increased enforcement rotation. We have started the firsts phase with the educational component that
consists of warnings and social media outreach. We will begin the enforcement phase shortly after.
Typically a code enforcement official is on duty from 8am-4pm Mon-Sat. Should you feel unsafe in the
future and would like an officer to come out as the incident is taking place I encourage you to call the
police dispatch line at (303) 761-7410 to have a code enforcement/animal welfare call generated.
Regards,
Dave Lewis Jr
Code Enforcement Supervisor
Englewood Police Dept
3615 S. Elati Street
Englewood, CO 80110
(303)762-2338 Direct
(303)-762-2335 Code Enforcement Line
dlewis@englewoodco.gov
www.englewoodco.gov
City of Englewood’s Mission: To
Promote and ensure a high quality of
Life, economic vitality, and a uniquely
Desirable community identity.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - The information contained in this e-mail and all attachments is
CONFIDENTIAL and intended only for the addressee. If you receive this message in error, please destroy
it immediately and notify the sender so that it may be redirected. Please be aware that dissemination,
distribution, copying, or other use of this information by unauthorized personnel is strictly prohibited.
From: "City of Englewood, CO" <info@englewoodgov.org>
Date: April 10, 2017 at 8:01:54 PM MDT
To: "City of Englewood, CO" <webmaster@englewoodgov.org>
Subject: Feedback for City of Englewood, CO
Reply-To:
You have received this feedback from
for the following page:
http://www.englewoodgov.org/inside-city-hall/city-departments/police-
department
The park at 2900 South Emerson, Englewood, CO is a beautiful park but is
becoming dangerous. I go there with my dogs who are on a leash. There are large
aggressive dogs, some are pit bulls, that are scaring and attacking other dogs. The
owners do not respect the rules which are on the sign which says the dogs must be
on a leash. I saw recent incidents of dogs being attacked or scared. This is a recipe
for disaster. People drive there just to let their dogs go off leash but it is not an off
leash park. Can you please help make this park safe and enforce the on leash
Page 121 of 268
rules. I am getting worried about taking my dogs near there and that is very sad.
Can you please help?
Page 122 of 268
From:
To:Dave Lee
Cc:
Subject:Re: Dogs at Jason Park
Date:Monday, June 20, 2011 8:59:40 AM
Attachments:image002.jpg
Dave,
As you know Englewood Unleashed does not allow this either. We have actively pursued dog
owners who let their dogs on the
playing fields, with the youth athletic leagues. We try to let every dog owner know, that this is
NEVER ALLOWED. That they must keep
thier dogs on the East side of the park, when there is play/games in the West fields.
Unfortunately, we are not always there, and their are people that do not read the "Rules Sign",
or misinterpet them, just because dogs are
allowed between 6 am and 11 am, etc.
I would be happy to contact , and tell her about EU's active role in preventing
this type of activity. We will do everything we can to
help in this situation. I will follow up with you, after I speak to (hopefully
today).
Kind Regards,
Englewood Unleashed
From: Dave Lee <dlee@englewoodgov.org>
To:
Cc: "contactus@englewoodunleashed.org" <contactus@englewoodunleashed.org>; Jerrell Black
<jblack@englewoodgov.org>; Joe Sack <jsack@englewoodgov.org>; Dave Parks
<dparks@englewoodgov.org>
Sent: Mon, June 20, 2011 7:31:10 AM
Subject: FW: Dogs at Jason Park
,
FYI. I believe will be contacting city council regarding the incidents that she
experienced at Jason Park. I was informed that dog owners are allowing their dogs to roam
through the middle of youth athletic programs and stating they have every right to be there.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Dave
From:
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 12:24 PM
Page 123 of 268
To: Dave Lee
Cc: Debby Severa; Dave Parks; Joe Sack
Subject: Dogs at Jason Park
Dave,
called regarding issues they encountered this morning while she was attending
Dave Parks’ Start Smart Youth program with her son. She had a problem with a dog owner
and observed several other incidents regarding dogs creating problems for park users. She
asked if she could speak to you to get her comments on record and find out what can be done.
She’s at .
Thanks,
Linda Trujillo
Department Assistant
Department of Parks and Recreation
City of Englewood
303-762-2685
ltrujillo@englewoodgov.org
Englewood Color Logo" width="127" height="93">
Page 124 of 268
From:kim love
To:Dave Lee
Cc:Kim Love
Subject:Re: Dogs in playground areas
Date:Thursday, May 14, 2009 9:17:00 AM
Dave,
Thank you for the information, with both comments & letters. This seems to be a isolated
incident at Jason, as we work hard to make sure this doesn't happen in our presence. Like the
Police, you can't be there 24/7 - therefore, once in a while someone who doesn't know the
rules...breaks them.
Would you also like us (EU) send these persons a e-mail, so we can reassure them that there is
an organization that also cares about what they think ? Please send me a copy of your
responses too?
Thank you for your time,
From: Dave Lee <dlee@englewoodgov.org>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:42:42 AM
Subject: FW: Dogs in playground areas
I am sending you a couple of complaints that I recently received. I will be providing a response and
following up on both. I just wanted to keep you in the loop.
Dave
From: Webmaster
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 1:38 PM
To: Dave Lee
Cc: Jerrell Black; Gary Hultberg; Christian Contos; Gary Condreay
Subject: FW: Dogs in playground areas
Hi Dave – This e-mail came in via the Web site. Would you mind responding to
Page 125 of 268
Thanks, Leigh Ann
Leigh Ann Hoffhines
Englewood City Manager's Office
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 1:28 PM
To: Webmaster
City of Englewood Online Form (Comment Form)
ANIMAL CONTROL:Animal Control Comment
OTHER DETAIL:Dogs in playground areas.
NAME:
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
QUESTION OR
COMMENT :
Please consider putting up signs at the children's playgrounds,
specficially the Bellevew Park, with the airplane, and Duncan Park.
People bring their dogs into the play area. They are going to the
bathroom in the area the children play in and one woman was taking
her German Sheperd up on the play set and slide and encouraged him
to dig in the shredded bark. I said that the area was for children, not
pets and she said, "well, I don't see any sign that says I can't bring my
dog into this area." Please help! Pets in areas where children play is
short of a health hazard. Thank you,
Englewood resident
Page 126 of 268
From:
To:Dave Lee
Cc:David Lewis Jr.;
Subject:Re: Emerson park
Date:Wednesday, March 20, 2019 7:12:45 PM
Super busy around 5:15-5:45pm....at least 7 dogs off leash...nor sure if they are not reading sign or if they think
nobody checks after hours?
Can Officer Lewis be permitted to check and drive by Emerson Park periodically between 5 and 6pm?
That would make a huge difference!
Thank you!!
> On Mar 18, 2019, at 6:33 AM, Dave Lee <dlee@englewoodco.gov> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> We have placed permanent signs at Emerson P{ark stating that the park is not an off-leash area. This should
alleviate any confusion on the park users end.
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2019 5:13 PM
> To: Dave Lee <dlee@Englewoodco.gov>; David Lewis Jr. <DLewis@Englewoodco.gov>;
> Subject: Emerson park
>
> Hello,
> Any updates? We opened our garage at 3:30 pm today and a woman with blond hair with pink steaks had her pit
bull run into our garage. This is not the first time. She seriously thinks it is an off leash park.
>
> Her dog was fine but that is not the point.
>
> Thank you.
>
Page 127 of 268
From:David Lewis Jr.
To:
Subject:RE: Hosana Sports Complex
Date:Friday, February 28, 2020 10:25:57 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image003.png
Dear ,
Thank you for bringing your concerns forward. I will forward them to the appropriate departments
for review and action.
Regards,
Dave Lewis Jr, Code Enforcement & Animal Welfare Supervisor
City of Englewood | Police Department
3615 S Elati St, Englewood, CO 80110
englewoodco.gov | o: 303.762.2338 |
From:
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2020 10:09 AM
To: David Lewis Jr. <DLewis@Englewoodco.gov>
Subject: Hosana Sports Complex
Good morning David. I would like to know if you have seen or are aware of the conditions in the Hosana
Sports Complex? Is is absolutely covered in dog excrement, construction slash from the score board
construction in the September/October of 2019 and completely missed managed by the city of Englewood
and its park employees.
I have been a landscape contractor for 33 years. In January, mostly snow free, I walked the park with a
fellow landscape contractor who I use a subcontractor from time to time. We both assessed than, it
would be $110,000 to mitigate the feces from the park, temporarily closing all areas except the east west
pedestrian trail, implementing new rules and regulations, and adding new trash disposal features, fencing,
and pedestrian access geared towards the high school students.
On the same walk, a civilian few a drone with 10 feet of my person. No signage indicates this is
prohibited. From a legal stand point, with drone flights, were a personal injury to occur, the city is on the
hook for damages. Overall, I am walking the park less, because it is rife with dog excrement,
construction debris and trash in general.
As the code enforcement supervisor, you and your city planner should visit Hosana Sports Complex and
immediately address the public health risk. You may also want to fire the parks and recreation manager.
Clearly him/her have no clue what to do or how to work. On the other hand, I do, but my service is not
free. Viewing this daily for an extending period, losing my property to a rat infestation from a dentist who
lied to the police about me and got away it, has inspired me to clean house and prepare to move on from
this shit hole of a poorly run community.
Best to you,
Page 128 of 268
From:Dave Lee
To:
Cc:Dave Lee
Subject:Recent Dog Incidents
Date:Tuesday, May 5, 2015 11:24:02 AM
Attachments:image002.jpg
During the last several days I have been contacted twice regarding dog related issues in the parks.
The first issue was from a woman who was bitten at Canine Corral and required emergency room
treatment. Her dog was bitten as well. The second issue came from a woman who has a grandchild
in a soccer program at Jason Park. Her concerns were around dogs running on to the soccer field and
dog fecal matter on the ground. I know there are currently off-leash hours at Jason to help reduce
dog/human conflicts. However, I am not sure the rules are being followed.
I have some concerns that off-leash privileges could be taken away if the number of dog related
issues continue to mount. I am asking for your help in getting the word out to our off-leash users
regarding poop pickup and making sure that our canine friends follow the rules regarding the times
of the day they can visit the park when games are scheduled. Also, if you have any other ideas or
suggestions that may help regarding these issues, I would greatly appreciate hearing them.
Thanks for your help.
Dave Lee
Open Space Manager
Department of Parks & Recreation
City of Englewood
303-762-2687
Page 129 of 268
Page 130 of 268
From:Lindsay Peterson
To:Dave Lee
Subject:Tball at Jason
Date:Thursday, May 30, 2019 12:19:18 PM
Attachments:Outlook-1496165371.png
Hi Dave,
Below are some comments and concerns from t-ball at Jason last night in regards to off-
leash dogs.
I gave them code enforcement and non-emergency numbers previously.
Let me know your thoughts.
Thanks,
Lindsay Peterson
Open Space Activities Supervisor
303-762-2697
www.englewoodrec.org
From:
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 11:33 AM
To:
Cc: Lindsay Peterson <lpeterson@Englewoodco.gov>;
@pirateyouthsports.com>
Subject: Re: Lines at Jason
Thank you for sending this over. Unfortunately, code enforcement quits at 5pm. This is
frustrating to hear and scary for the kids safety.
Lindsay, Please pass this on to your committee I spoke to and let them know this can not
continue. Should we call 911 after 5pm to make a complaint? Or can you ask police to drive
by a couple times from 5 to 7pm?
I don't think we should wait for a child to get hurt before we do something.
If you have the emails for all the members in that meeting, i would be happy to send these off
to them.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Englewood, CO 80113
Insurance we offer: Medicare, Home, Auto, Umbrella, Life, Health, Dental,
Page 131 of 268
Supplements, Disability, Commercial Liability, Workers Compensation---Call or emailfor a quote!!!
This electronic message transmission, including any attachments, contains information from McGirl Insurance Inc. which
may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by a "reply to
sender only" message and destroy all electronic and hard copies of the communication, including attachments.
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 11:23 AM > wrote:
Lindsay,
I dont know if you were at practice last night but the dogs are everywhere!! For the
most part they clear the fields when we are playing, but after practice a bunch of
kids played on the playground. There were dogs everywhere. One dog was jumping
on the playground equipment including the bottom of the slide. Then
daughter was running around and a dog jumped on her and knocked her over. I
happened to be walking to shed and saw the whole thing. I yelled at the lady and
said your dog is jumping all over kids. I hear her say to another person dont they
know this is a dog park...I dont think the girl was hurt just scared, maybe a scratch.
After practices a couple kids were throwing the ball still and a dog was chasing the
ball. Just annoying stuff. I know nothing you can specifically do but at what point do
we get code enforcement involved? Do we ask them to come at 5 and let people
know they arent supposed to be there until 6 off leash?
When I arrive at 5pm there are probably 20+ dogs there. They are not supposed to
be there until 6pm off leash correct?
Just thought I would let you guys know. I know I had to pick up a pile of poop from
my field yesterday.
Search 1,000's of Homes Instantly at
Click Here to Like Us on Facebook
Page 132 of 268
Council Member Stone's
Off-Leash Park Survey
12 Resident/2 Non-Resident/9 Undetermined
17 Support Off-Leash/6 Against Off-Leash
1.Which park do you frequent most often?
Jason 11
Duncan 3
Rotolo 2
Centennial 5
Greenbelt 1
Belleview 1
Other:Cherrelyn
Comments:
2. About how many times per week?
1-2 times/week 2
3-4 times/week 4
5-7 times/week 11
Other:10-12 per week
14-25 times a week (twice a day, sometimes more)
At least 3 times per day!
3. Do you visit only during designated off-leash times?
Yes 18
No 3
Comments:
4. Would you visit during current off-leash times if we made it permissible?
Yes 13
I walk to Rotolo Park and the green belt by that park. I avoid Jason Park because of all of the dogs. I
even have a gate that is never used from my backyard into Jason Park that has a pad lock attached
and a privacy fence put over it
I visit Duncan Park most frequently. I know the majority of the neighbors that take their dogs there
at this point and have never once seen a dog fight/attack take place at Duncan, nor have I
encountered a rude owner. Last summer/fall when they were doing kids soccer at Duncan, I would
go to Jason.
We try to use the park during non off leash hours but it doesn’t seem to make much difference as
many owners choose to ignore the rules and let their dogs run free at any hour
Page 133 of 268
Council Member Stone's
Off-Leash Park Survey
No 1
Comments:I visit during both off- and non-off-leash times.
5. Have you ever visitied Canine Corrall?
Yes 9
No 6
Comments Not aware of it
If yes, how often:
If no, why not?
Yes. I have been to the Canine Corral - I liked it because they have a tap for dogs to drink water,
I think the Canine Corral provides adequate space for dogs to run around if need to. I think the
upkeep can be challenging due to so much use of the Canine Corral.
No, I do not regularly go to Canine Corral. Duncan Park is within a few blocks of my home so is
much more convenient, and I use this as part of my daily exercise routine. The paved pathway
provides a safe walking area around the park, which is maintained year round (limited snow/ice
buildup) so allows both me and my dog to exercise together safely year round. I usually do a couple
laps while my dog runs around with me. A lot of neighbors use it this way, either walk or run
around the park while their dog runs around off leash with them.
No, but I have in the past. I have a shy and sometimes timid dog and I'm not a fan of the dogs
there.
Never been there we just got our dog and was introduced to this park by the foster family.
Yes I've been to the canine Corral a number of times. This does not offer what I look for at all. It is a
large number of animals cooped up in a pen forced to interact with bully dogs picking on other dogs
frequently. There's also no grass there it is a muddy mess in the winter and the summer is way too
hot. I'm looking for a place where I can go with my dog and sit and relax on a piece of grass walk
around throw the ball
Too hot, dusty, crowded, harder for this human to get exercise. I love Centennial because I can walk
laps around the lake while my dog runs, chases balls, visits with her dog friends, sniffs around. Also,
after many years of going there, I know people and feel that they are part of my community.Page 134 of 268
Council Member Stone's
Off-Leash Park Survey
Yes, I have -- a number of times, but I stopped going for the reasons in b. Instead, I work to get to
Jason Street during the permitted hours, and go to Canine Coral as a default option since it is open
for off leash at all park hours.
N/A, but we had a couple of issues with the Corral. Since it's not grass, it gets dirty very quickly.
Rain and snow create mud pools in the ground's depressions. Having to clean my dog every time
she visited a mud pool became too time consuming. The park is also not patrolled by code
enforcement. I've never once seed a code enforcement officer there. Sometimes people bring
aggressive, unaltered dogs and they don't control them. In the past few months, this has actually
gotten better. I think this is because people are holding those irresponsible owners accountable.
Another reason I don't visit as often is because the agility course has been removed. That was a
great asset to the park to help train and exercise dogs. Overall, the Corral is a great place with trees
and safe spaces for dogs to run and play. Older residents and residents with special needs have a
great place to exercise their dogs in a safe environment. I think if it had grass it would be even
better.
I never visit canine corral though I have in the past. My findings were that often there were more
aggressive dogs there and owners were less apt to have them in control, often standing and talking
instead of paying attention to their dog. After my dog was attacked a few times I quit going here
though admittedly this happened awhile ago so no recent experience.
When we first got our puppy in 2018, we visited 14-25 times a week for about a year. It's enclosed
environment allowed us to safely work on her training (to come when called, not jump, etc.)
without having to worry she would run away.
I personally think this is the worst off-leash park in Englewood. I've taken my dog there before and I
won't go back. I've found the owners that frequent that park are irresponsible, don't have control
over their dogs (or don't care), and don't listen when you ask them to stop their dog from playing
very rough, etc. I understand I'm generalizing and not everyone falls into the above, but I've given it
numerous chances and each time leave either uncomfortable for my dog's safety (keep in mind he's
a 65 pound Golden Retriever), or my own.
Rarely. Centennial Park is more convenient for me because it is within walking distance.Page 135 of 268
Council Member Stone's
Off-Leash Park Survey
6. Do you believe Canine Corral provides a reasonable community space and resources in exchange for the cost of it's upkeep?
Yes 2
No
Don’t know 2
Comments:
I can't really comment on this point. I specifically purchased my home because of its proximity to
an off leash park. I prefer not to have to get in the car and drive if I can avoid it.
I believe the CC serves a purpose. The fenced in space allows for people who may not be able to run
after or keep control of their dogs in an open fenced space. I believe CC is a very needed and used
space. I don’t know what the cost of that space is, but it can’t be much. There is no grass to
maintain and the weeds are cut down. It’s dirt and weeds. The only cost to me seems to be
supplying poop bags and emptying the trash.
1. Not as big or open -- and not grass -- I have a sporting breed dog, and she needs to run off leash,
have fun checking the squirrels out etc. She is on an e collar, and I've never had issues keeping her
away from the road, the playground or the covered picnic area at Jason Street; 3. The mulch at
Canine Coral seems hotter, drier and kind of dirty compared to any of the regular parks; 3. There is
a different 'crowd' of dogs and people that go regularly to Canine Corral, including some smokers,
and I find Jason is a better fit for me and my pup.
Almost 10 years ago I took one of my dogs who was a puppy then to Canine Corral and wish I
hadn't. The bark chips aren't a good surface to try and play on and worse then that the chips retain
all the dogs urine and some of the feces which I think was responsible for my puppy having stomach
issues for years afterword
I've gone once or twice. My issue with a normal fenced in dog park is that most owners are lazy and
just stand around while not watching their dogs (the issue I gather is happening at Jason Park). Dogs
do not self- entertain and need to walk purposefully and that is really difficult to do if the fenced in
dog park is small.
We have tried to use canine corral but it seemed to have a lot of larger, aggressive dogs I like the
idea of a fenced in park or a park for pets only
The park is dirty and dusty or muddy if it has rained. I also will not go there because of all the dog
fights I have witnessed over the years. I think Canine Corral is good for dogs that maybe would run
if not in a fenced area. I was walking my dog past Canine Corral one day on the trail and some lady
was taking her dog to Canine Corral but did not have the dog on a lease prior to entering the park,
and her dog attacked my dog and the lady did nothing.Page 136 of 268
Council Member Stone's
Off-Leash Park Survey
I don't really know, since I haven't spent time there.
7. Would you support a plan to createa Parks Rangers Division for Englewood Parks?
Yes 8
No 2
Not Sure 1
Comments:
Yes, I would also support volunteer self-policing our group.
I don't know since I'm not aware of the details on cost relative to other options. As I mentioned, as
a default option, I still appreciate CC.
I think the Canine Corral is fine, but it's not ideal for dogs and dog owners who want to walk off
leash. Walking off leash provides dogs with mental stimulation, physical exercise, chances for
socialization and opportunities for behavioral training.
It is a little smaller and the mulch is functional, but grass is so much nicer for the dogs as well.
I would support, but do not know how this would work unless they were onsite all the time.
Possibly. Obviously it would be dependent on the cost and what community needs were being
satisfied.
No, don’t believe we need park rangers, there are way to many parks for that to be cost effective.
What is the price of upkeep? Can’t answer because not sure what resources are provided and costs
associated with it.
See my answer above, again this is not what I'm looking for spend quality time with my dog it's
made for dogs to socialize with each other not with their humans
Yes, absolutely. The Corral can't possibly cost much to keep up. The fence is already in place; they
use recycled Christmas trees collected by the city to spread over the play area. The water is turned
off in winter and turned back on in spring. Everything is already there, so the only upkeep is simply
supplying poop bags and emptying trash cans.
I guess I'm not sure what this is referring to. I haven't been there in over a year so perhaps there's
resources available that weren't previously there?
Canine Corral is ok in the summer, but it can be very muddy throughout the winter/spring when we
get snow or rain.Page 137 of 268
Council Member Stone's
Off-Leash Park Survey
I think I would, if they could help keep the parks (Centennial in particular) clean.
I do not support creating a Park Rangers Division for
If it keeps off-leash use available, yes.
I would need more information but most likely, yes.
Englewood Parks. That’s more cost to taxpayers and the off leash rules have never been enforced.
I would would support a plan for enforcement of off leash times, owners being responsible, etc.
What would this enforcement look like?
No, I think this would an unnecessary added cost. We already have code enforecement in position.
Let's use what's in place and improve it.
I could support this if it is not to get to the extent of Denver. (Rangers waiting for you to throw
your poop bag away to ticket you for not having a leash in hand for a matter of seconds)
Not really. I say this because there are too many dog parks in Englewood and to keep people from
picking up dog poop, being there during off leash hours, owners not having their pets under voice
control is way too much for a Park Ranger. As I spoke to a gentleman two weeks ago, as this was
going on...he also said, "people forget that dogs are dogs, even if you have them under voice
command. If they see something, they will go after it no matter what, they are animals." I totally
agree with him. He even said that his dog is under voice command, but some dogs were chasing
him and his dog was scared and ran into the street, even though he was calling him. My dog has
dog has done the same thing and he is under voice command as well. So, I honestly can't say this
would help the situation. Maybe if we downsized to a few parks, then it may work, so the Park
Ranger will have time to go to the parks.
If that is what is needed -- I'm well aware that cost is always an issue, and this is something I would
look to you and your colleagues to advise on (and the Parks and Recs Division). If your various input
lead to this recommendation, yes, I would support it.
I think it would end up being to much like code enforcement in that they become totally reactive
instead of proactive and rarely are able to accomplish anything positive.
I am not sure what the implications of this would be. What would the park rangers do? Would they
be at the parks for oversight and that would allow for off leash hours still? If so, yes.Page 138 of 268
Council Member Stone's
Off-Leash Park Survey
8. Would you support a minimal pet licensing fee to fund Park Rangers and park upkeep and upgrades?
Yes 8
No 1
Not sure
Comments:
Or even a drop permit box at the park itself
Yes and additionally I would be willing to pay for an annual pass to Centennial Park
Again, if it allows residents to continue to use off-leash hours, yes.
Yes - but I am curious about how this would be enforced.
Yes, with reservations. Since we already pay taxes to keep up the parks, I think we need to revisit
the budget and exactly how money is being spent. Once that has been done, then re-examine the
date to determine if a pet licensing fee is necessary. These decisions and decision-making protocols
need to be guided by sound data, not kneejerk reactions to one or two complaints. Efforts need to
be collaborative and involve all community members and their varied interests. It can't just be one
person's goal.
I would like to know more information regarding the pet licensing fee. Would it be allocated from
taxes or how would that be collected? What would the upkeep and upgrades be like?
It would depend on the fee. I'm not thrilled that I would have to pay to take my dog to Jason Park
or Canine Corral because other people can't pick up after their dogs. I have also been told, that
they do confront a person about their dog poop and the person says to mind their own business.
No, I do not support a pet licensing fee. People are not going to pay just for the privilege to allow
their dogs off leash. If they do, it will probably only be about a quarter of the people will actually
pay and get a license. It will cost the city more money to pay someone just to collect those fees.
Again, someone will need to be posted on site at each park to enforce the rules which the either
the city or fees will not cover. There are too many off leash parks with too many open hours to
justify paying someone, it's not feasible. Again, please close and end the off leash privileges at
Jason Park. I do not enjoy the constant nuisance barking of a 24 hours a day dog park located
behind my house.
I would fully support a pet licensing fee or better yet a Parks & Rec fee for using the off leash parks.
I simple paw print added to a Rec card would show that dog owners have paid their dues. I feel a
licensing fee would be harder to enforce.Page 139 of 268
Council Member Stone's
Off-Leash Park Survey
I don't know if maybe there could be volunteers that could donate time on the Park Ranger Division t
Additonal comments:Separate sections for small dogs to keep them safe from big dogs is a good idea
I'm not totally clear as to what part of the off leash issue the Park Rangers would solve. Not
opposed to it, just unclear. Can you tell me more about the Park Ranger roles and responsibilities?
As long as it is reasonable, I would support this. If it got out of hand financially or if the rangers
went military on us I would want to move to a more relaxed location.
Again, definitely! Us older residents have a limited number of safe places to go and I know people
from Jason that this is their one and only outing and social contact.
I would be in favor of an off leash fee to maintain off leash areas, let the owners that are so
adamant about their “off leash rights” bear the expense of policing them
Page 140 of 268
MINUTES
City Council Regular Meeting
Monday, July 6, 2020
Teleconferenced 5:30 PM
1 Call to Order
The Special/Regular meeting of the Englewood City Council was called to order by
Mayor Olson at 5:38 p.m. and held by teleconference.
2 Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Olson.
3 Roll Call
COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Linda Olson
Mayor Pro Tem Othoniel Sierra
Council Member Joe Anderson
Council Member Dave Cuesta
Council Member Rita Russell
Council Member Cheryl Wink, Joined at 5:55 pm
Council Member John Stone, Joined at 5:46 pm
COUNCIL ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Lewis
City Attorney McKenney Brown
Deputy City Clerk McKinnon
Deputy City Clerk Truscott Reed
Director Power, Community Development
Director D'Andrea, Public Works
Director Sobota, Finance and Administration
Deputy Director of Utilities Simon, Utilities
Redevelopment Manager Poremba, Community Development
Planning Manager Burkholder, Community Development
Capital Projects and Engineering Manager Hoos, Public Works
Construction Manager Main, Public Works
Revenue and Tax Audit Supervisor Driscoll, Finance
Network Administrator Hunnicutt, Information Technology
Police Chief Collins, Police Department
Deputy Chief Watson, Police Department
Page 1 of 9
Draft
Page 141 of 268
City Council Regular
July 6, 2020
Police Sergeant Read, Police Department
4 Study Session Topic
a) Police Chief John Collins was present with Deputy Cheif Sam Watson and
Police Sergeant Chad Read to discuss the community report on policing in
Englewood with a panel of speakers from the community including Organizing
Director at Denver Alliance for Street Health Response Vinnie Cervantes,
Assistant Professor/Law Enforcement Instructor Dr. Paul Taylor, Executive
Director at Servicios De La Raza Rudy Gonzales, and District Attorney George
Brauchler from the 18th Judicial District of Colorado.
The meeting recessed at 7:29 p.m. for a break.
The meeting reconvened at 7:34 p.m. with all Council Members present.
5 Consideration of Minutes of Previous Session
a) Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of June 15, 2020.
Moved by Council Member Othoniel Sierra
Seconded by Council Member Cheryl Wink
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL/REGULAR CITY COUNCIL
MEETING OF JUNE 15, 2020.
For Against Abstained
Cheryl Wink (Seconded By) x
Dave Cuesta x
Joe Jefferson
John Stone x
Linda Olson x
Othoniel Sierra (Moved By) x
Rita Russell x
Joe Anderson x
7 0 0
Motion CARRIED
b) Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting of June 23, 2020.
Moved by Council Member Othoniel Sierra
Seconded by Council Member John Stone
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL EMERGENCY CITY
COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2020.
Page 2 of 9
Draft
Page 142 of 268
City Council Regular
July 6, 2020
For Against Abstained
Cheryl Wink x
Dave Cuesta x
Joe Jefferson
John Stone (Seconded By) x
Linda Olson x
Othoniel Sierra (Moved By) x
Rita Russell x
Joe Anderson x
7 0 0
Motion CARRIED.
6 Appointments, Communications, Proclamations, and Recognition
There were no Appointments, Communications, Proclamations, or Recognition.
7 Recognition of Scheduled Public Comment
a) Elizabeth Murphy, an Englewood Resident, was scheduled address Council
but was not present.
b) Patricia Mitchell addressed Council regarding off-leash dog parks.
c) Jilian Chavez addressed Council regarding a tattoo shop zoning variance.
d) Sam Hussari, an Englewood Resident, addressed Council regarding a tattoo
shop zoning variance.
e) Poorvi and Ross Pfenning with Englewood Unleashed addressed Council
regarding off-leash dog parks.
f) Jake Gilbert, an Englewood Resident, addressed Council regarding off-leash
dog parks.
g) Alisa Osemwengie, an Englewood Resident, addressed Council regarding off-
leash dog parks.
h) Julie Tegan, an Englewood Resident, addressed Council regarding off-leash
dog parks.
i) Tracy Jones, an Englewood Resident, addressed Council regarding off-leash
dog parks.
j) Dean Kimplum, an Englewood Resident, addressed Council regarding off-
leash dog parks.
k) Martha Griego, an Englewood Resident, addressed Council regarding off-leash
dog parks.
l) Christina Segura, an Englewood Resident, addressed Council regarding off-
Page 3 of 9
Draft
Page 143 of 268
City Council Regular
July 6, 2020
leash dog parks.
m) Pamela Beets, an Englewood Resident, was scheduled address Council but
was not present.
8 Recognition of Unscheduled Public Comment
a) Lisa Harris, an Englewood Resident, addressed Council regarding Emerson
Park.
b) Barb Chumley, an Englewood Resident, addressed Council regarding stop
signs and speed limits
c) Jordon Storfa, an Englewood Resident, adressed Council regarding off-leash
dogs at Emerson Park.
d) Lorena Gaibor, and Englewood Resident, addressed Council regarding
policing.
Council Member Sierra responded to Public Comment.
9 Consent Agenda Items
Council Member Russell removed Agenda Item 9(c)(i) from Consent Agenda.
Moved by Council Member Wink, seconded by Council Member Stone to approve
Consent Agenda Items 9(b)(i-ii) and 9(c)(ii).
a) Approval of Ordinances on First Reading
There were no Ordinances on First Reading.
b) Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading.
i) CB 23 - An ordinance to submit a ballot issue to electors, re: Lodging
Tax
ORDINANCE NO. 23, SERIES OF 2020 (COUNCIL BILL NO. 23,
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ANDERSON)
AN ORDINANCE SUBMITTING TO A VOTE OF THE REGISTERED
ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AT THE NOVEMBER 3,
2020 GENERAL ELECTION A BALLOT ISSUE TO AUTHORIZE THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD LODGING TAX TO BE INCREASED FROM
2% TO 5%, WITH THE RESULTING REVENUE TO BE USED TO
FUND ANY LAWFUL GOVERNMENTAL PURPOSE DETERMINED
BY THE CITY COUNCIL, AND WITH THE RESULTING TAX
Page 4 of 9
Draft
Page 144 of 268
City Council Regular
July 6, 2020
REVENUE BEING ALLOWED TO BE COLLECTED AND SPENT
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY LIMITATIONS PROVIDED BY LAW
ii) CB 24 - Intergovernmental Agreement - RTD and City of Englewood
ORDINANCE NO. 24, SERIES OF 2020 (COUNCIL BILL NO. 24,
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER WINK)
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL
AGREEMENT FOR 2020 RTD FUNDING OF LOCAL
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES WITH THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
FOR THE ENGLEWOOD TROLLEY
c) Resolutions and Motions
i) Renew the Professional Services Agreement with Martin and Wood
Water Consultants Inc.
[Clerks note: This agenda item was removed from the Consent
Agenda Motion and considered independently.]
Moved by Council Member Rita Russell
Seconded by Council Member Cheryl Wink
Motion to approve a Professional Services Agreement with Martin and
Wood Water Consultants Inc. in an amount not to exceed $300,000 for
engineering services supporting the City’s water resources protection and
future planning.
For Against Abstained
Cheryl Wink (Seconded By) x
Dave Cuesta x
Joe Jefferson
John Stone x
Linda Olson x
Othoniel Sierra x
Rita Russell (Moved By) x
Joe Anderson x
7 0 0
Motion CARRIED.
ii) Renew the Professional Services Agreement with Berg Hill Greenleaf &
Ruscitti, LLP.
Motion to approve a Professional Services Agreement with Berg Hill
Greenleaf & Ruscitti, LLP (BHGR) in an amount not to exceed $400,000
Page 5 of 9
Draft
Page 145 of 268
City Council Regular
July 6, 2020
for legal representation as part of the City’s water resource management
team.
Moved by Council Member Cheryl Wink
Seconded by Council Member John Stone
Motion to approve Consent Agenda Items 9(b)(i ii) and 9(c)(i-ii).
For Against Abstained
Cheryl Wink (Moved By) x
Dave Cuesta x
Joe Jefferson
John Stone (Seconded By) x
Linda Olson x
Othoniel Sierra x
Rita Russell x
Joe Anderson x
7 0 0
Motion CARRIED.
10 Public Hearing Items
No public hearing was scheduled before Council.
11 Ordinances, Resolutions and Motions
a) Approval of Ordinances on First Reading
There were no Ordinances on First Reading.
b) Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading
i) CB 25 - Concerning the Creation and Organization of the Englewood
Downtown Development Authority (DDA)
Moved by Council Member Joe Anderson
Seconded by Council Member Cheryl Wink
ORDINANCE NO. 25, SERIES OF 2020 (COUNCIL BILL NO. 25,
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER SIERRA)
AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING THE CREATION AND
ORGANIZATION OF THE ENGLEWOOD DOWNTOWN
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD,
COLORADO, DECLARING THE NECESSITY FOR AN ELECTION
CONCERNING THE FORMATION OF SUCH AUTHORITY, PURSUANT
Page 6 of 9
Draft
Page 146 of 268
City Council Regular
July 6, 2020
TO COLO. CONST. ART. X, SEC. 20 AND STATUTORY REVENUE
LIMITATIONS FOR SUCH AUTHORITY, AUTHORIZING THE
INCURRENCE OF OBLIGATIONS FOR THE ENGLEWOOD
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, AND THE LEVYING OF AD VALOREM PROPERTY
TAXES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPOSED
ENGLEWOOD DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
DETERMINING ORGANIZATIONAL ASPECTS OF THE ENGLEWOOD
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BOARD, AND PROVIDING
OTHER DETAILS RELATED THERETO.
For Against Abstained
Cheryl Wink (Seconded By) x
Dave Cuesta x
John Stone x
Linda Olson x
Othoniel Sierra x
Rita Russell x
Joe Anderson (Moved By) x
5 2 0
Motion CARRIED
c) Resolutions and Motions
i) Award of Contract to Chavez Construction, Inc. for Construction of the
2020 Mill and Overlay Project
Moved by Council Member Joe Anderson
Seconded by Council Member Othoniel Sierra
Motion to approve a contract with Chavez Construction, for the 2020 Mill
and Overlay Project, in the amount of $1,218,957.10 with allowance for a
10% contingency in the amount of $121,895.71.
For Against Abstained
Cheryl Wink x
Dave Cuesta x
John Stone x
Linda Olson x
Othoniel Sierra (Seconded By) x
Rita Russell x
Joe Anderson (Moved By) x
7 0 0
Motion CARRIED
Page 7 of 9
Draft
Page 147 of 268
City Council Regular
July 6, 2020
The meeting recessed at 9:14 p.m. for a break.
The meeting reconvened at 9:19 p.m. with 6 Council Members present.
Council Member Wink was absent.
Council Member Wink returned to the meeting from the break at 9:21 p.m.
12 Covid-19 Update
13 General Discussion
a) Mayor's Choice
i) City Council discussed mandating face masks.
Discussion ensued.
Moved by Council Member John Stone
Seconded by Council Member Cheryl Wink
Motion to direct City Manager Lewis, in accordance with Ordinance 10,
Series 2020, to mandate masks to be worn in Englewood businesses,
government offices, and public transit. The mandate will take effect
Thursday, July 9, 2020.
Discussion ensued.
Moved by Council Member Joe Anderson
Seconded by Council Member Linda Olson
Motion to amend the implementation of this order from Thursday, July 9,
2020 to Friday, July 10, 2020 at 8 am.
For Against Abstained
Cheryl Wink x
Dave Cuesta x
John Stone x
Linda Olson (Seconded By) x
Othoniel Sierra x
Rita Russell x
Joe Anderson (Moved By) x
3 4 0
Motion DEFEATED.
Moved by Council Member John Stone
Seconded by Council Member Cheryl Wink
Page 8 of 9
Draft
Page 148 of 268
City Council Regular
July 6, 2020
Motion to direct City Manager Lewis, in accordance with Ordinance 10,
Series 2020, to mandate masks to be worn in Englewood businesses,
government offices, and public transit. The mandate will take effect
Thursday, July 9, 2020.
For Against Abstained
Cheryl Wink (Seconded By) x
John Stone (Moved By) x
Dave Cuesta x
Linda Olson x
Othoniel Sierra x
Rita Russell x
Joe Anderson x
4 3 0
Motion CARRIED.
b) Council Members' Choice
14 City Manager’s Report
15 City Attorney’s Report
16 Adjournment
Roll call was taken to adjourn the meeting - Seven Ayes. The meeting adjourned at
10:29 p.m.
Deputy City Clerk
Page 9 of 9
Draft
Page 149 of 268
From:Steven Jenkins
To:City Clerk
Subject:Re: Sign-up to Speak for Public Comment
Date:Sunday, July 19, 2020 5:20:14 PM
USE CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. DO NOT CLICK LINKS or OPEN
ATTACHMENTS unless you have verified the sender and know that the content is legitimate.
I have 5 minutes to speak, this is my speech (for the city council meeting, tomorrow night)..
I'm a veteran of the United States Navy. I support my president, the police and I'm a lifetime
member of the D.A.V.
Fining or imprisoning 'free' American citizens for not complying with a mandatory mask
mandate, is an infringement of our constitutional rights and our civil liberties.
The CDC just admitted to adding pneumonia and influenza deaths with the covid-19 deaths
and the covid numbers dropped significantly.. It's estimated to have dropped from around
54,000 to 11,000.
Based on death certificate data, the percentage of deaths attributed to Pneumonia, Influenza or
COVID-19 (PIC) decreased from a 9.0% (week 25) to a 5.9% (week 26) and was over
reported by almost 90%.
The estimated survival rating is hard for the experts to determine, but they estimate it to be
about 98.5% (without a cure or vaccine).
Safety, is already no longer a valid argument..
Most people don't wear a proper mask or wear their mask properly.. this should be just as big
of a concern as not wearing one at all! If you are truly worried about safety and you are fining
and imprisoning people for not wearing a face mask, you should be doing the same thing for
people not wearing a proper mask (n95) and not wearing that proper mask, properly. Non-
medical grade masks have not been proven effective against COVID-19 according to studies
conducted by medical experts and the World Health Organization.
Where is the scientific data that shows what type of cloth material or fabric works best against
infectious disease?
If people are more prone to contracting the China virus through touch (rather than breathing it
in), why are people not being fined or arrested for not wearing gloves?
Why are there no biohazard bins for the used masks, if the virus is so contagious and deadly?
Muslim women, who have been forced to wear hijab over their faces for years, have had their
faces covered.. yet, Muslim women are still contracting the virus? Is it because their cloth
material or fabric, provides no medical benefits (just like the handkerchiefs that Americans are
wearing)?
Page 150 of 268
You know you live in a liberal state (Colorado) run by a power-hungry dictator (Jared Polis),
when the same service used to alert citizens of a 'real emergency' or a missing child, was used
to enforce a mandatory 'face mask' mandate.. despite previous statements from the Governor
saying that he would not issue such an order.
Now Colorado numbers..
Confirmed cases are still down nearly 40% from the first wave in March, this is happening
while testing has significantly increased.. Despite a massive increase in COVID-19 testing,
Colorado is doing very well compared to peak infections in April. Cases are down.
Hospitalizations are down, Deaths are down.. yet, Governor Polis is bowing to political
pressures and letting the mob rule Colorado's policies. I guess he has forgotten his campaign
slogan 'A Colorado for all?'
There are communities in Colorado that haven't had a single case (cases are predominantly in
metro areas of the state, some counties have not reported a single case in weeks).
The Governor seems to believe that those who make educated decisions for themselves are (in
his words) 'selfish bastards." He has spent most of his time mask shaming people and
developing 'one size fits nobody' orders while staying silent on riots and vandalism, leaving
the Capitol in disrepair.
Though we should maintain caution, we cannot let fear control us and the Governor still has
not clearly laid out the metrics for success in combating COVID-19.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020, 9:58 AM City Clerk <CityClerk@englewoodco.gov> wrote:
Good Morning,
If you would like to sign-up to speak for public comment at the upcoming City Council
meeting for Monday, July 20th, please visit
https://englewoodco.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_ct8z_ytrR7WBEqw_AfA70A and register!
Thank you,
City Clerk’s Office
City of Englewood
1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, CO 80110
jreed@englewoodco.gov | o: 303.762.2430 m: 303.762.2318
City of Englewood’s Mission: To promote and ensure a high quality of life, economic vitality, and a uniquely
desirable community identity.
Page 151 of 268
Sender and receiver should be mindful that all of my incoming and outgoing e-mails may be subject to the
Colorado Open Records Act.
Page 152 of 268
From:Elizabeth Rardin
To:City Clerk
Subject:Remarks about Maintaining Off-Leash Dog Privileges
Date:Monday, July 20, 2020 1:42:18 PM
USE CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. DO NOT CLICK LINKS or OPEN
ATTACHMENTS unless you have verified the sender and know that the content is legitimate.
Hello! I signed up too late and this speech is 4 minutes and 40 seconds when I timed it, so I
wanted to send along the full unedited version before shortening it for tonight.
Thank you so much for your consideration!
Elizabeth
My name is Elizabeth Murphy and I am a proud Englewood resident. My husband
and I love Englewood very much and are so excited to raise our kids here. As we look for
houses, we have decided to look strictly in Englewood, due in large part to Jason Park
We have an 8 month old Goldendoodle and Jason Park has been a blessing. We
were so impressed when we arrived at the park to see a thriving community of kind dog
owners and friendly dogs. This park has been a source of comfort and connection to many
for years and years and my husband and I feel so lucky to have recently found this
community. It is one of the ways we have felt most connected to Englewood since moving
here in 2017. When we found out that the off-leash privileges might end, we were
heartbroken. Jason park is especially important to us because we live in Oxford Station
Apartments, a large apartment building with no grass for dogs to play. Many dog owners
live here because of the easy access to Jason Park. None of the other proposed options for
off-leash are within walking distance of our building.
Jason Park is large enough that dogs have space to run around and play. It is large
enough that small dogs and large dogs can all have space to play safely. The fact that it is
not fenced in means everyone watches their dog. I rarely see anyone even checking their
phones while with their dogs at the park because people are so attentive to their dogs. I
have seen people gently let others know "hey your dog is pooping!" and people respond
positively with “Thanks!” and hurry over to pick it up. Our dog is only 8 months, yet she is so
brave and well socialized thanks to the guidance of the dogs at this park.
In 4 short months of going to the park, I have learned countless dog's names,
owner's names and tricks for how to help your dog behave. I have learned about
community events and connected with many Englewood residents. I can't even imagine the
loss that this would be for those who have spent 15 years with the park as their source of
exercise and connection. Although the sub-committee recommends that Englewood Parks
Page 153 of 268
and Rec can sponsor other events to promote community, I personally know as a teacher,
dog mom and soon to be human mom, I do not often have the bandwidth to attend
community events, but since my dog needs exercise and socialization, I can make the dog
park a priority and continue feeling connected to the community in a genuine way.
I bring my dog to the park twice daily, during the specified hours and watch her
closely to ensure I am cleaning up after her and she is following the rules. Everyone I have
talked to at Jason Park is willing to compromise, to find a solution that works for pet
owners, parents, sports teams and neighbors. People are willing to put up a fence between
the playground and dog area, not come during sporting events, pay a fee for yearly usage,
serve as ambassadors for the park. People are also willing to get off-leash certified and
seem very interested in continued education so that the people and pets of Englewood can
peacefully coexist. The willingness to try these measures shows the importance of Jason
Park to the community.
Based on the data provided in the Spring 2020 survey about off leash dogs and the
Take the Lead proposal, getting rid of off-leash privileges at Duncan, Centennial and Jason
would be premature. The survey conducted in the spring of 2020 had only 70 participants.
My husband is in grad school and we know how difficult it is to get people to respond to
surveys :) , but this is not representative of Englewood which has 34,690 residents. The
respondents make up 0.2% of Englewood. The 2017-2018 edition of the AVMA (American
Veterinary Medical Association) Pet Ownership and Demographics Sourcebook reported
that 65% of households in CO have dogs! By allowing parks to have off leash dogs and
families, Englewood is very appealing to young professionals looking to find a community to
settle down in. Further, looking at the number of code violations from the Take the Lead
Proposal in 2019 and 2020, there were very few code enforcement cases at Jason or
Duncan.
Instead of spending the money to develop new parks after closing the existing ones,
why not try some of the measures recommended previously by the Off Leash Dog Sub
Committee? I fully support the ideas suggested by Code Enforcement I read on the
document, including dog licensing/ registering and tagging. The registration fees could help
make up for the lost revenue of youth sports. The majority of households in CO own dogs
and providing these spaces is a huge draw for Englewood. The majority of dog owners at
Jason Park are respectful and conscientious and will work with the city to ensure that the
park remains a safe and beautiful place for everyone. Thank you.
Page 154 of 268
From:C.A. Dickerson
To:Linda Olson; Rita Russell; Cheryl Wink; Dave Cuesta; Othoniel Sierra; John Stone; Joe Anderson; Shawn Lewis;
City Clerk
Subject:Off leash Public forum Are there not far more important issues for Parks and Rec?
Date:Monday, July 20, 2020 5:25:28 PM
USE CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. DO NOT CLICK LINKS or OPEN
ATTACHMENTS unless you have verified the sender and know that the content is legitimate.
The memo issued by staff regarding “off leash” and dog parks, seems inaccurate at best, and the
statements and time line submitted are not backed up with facts or valid statistics or even
ordinances cited. It is driven by staff without rhyme nor reason, and unsupported by fact and history
Example:
1. 2003 Bates/Logan off leash “privileges” revoked. In what way? Was there an ordinance GRANTING
off leash “privileges”? I have lived for 23 years in direct line of sight to Bates/Logan and I never knew
of any such “privilege”. Bates/Logan was always a place people played ball with their dogs and
congregated and socialized, and obedience training was done there.
2. Most of Title 7 Chapter 1A-C, regarding animals, was revised in 2008, as a result of the Dangerous
Dog task force recommendations, yet there is no mention of this task force, nor the ordinance.
3. “complaints of aggressive dogs”. The code is clear on “aggressive dogs” though it defines them as
“at risk” and “dangerous”, both of which are “unlawful”, and such dogs if adjudicated such, have to
be leashed at all times and if “dangerous” have to wear a muzzle in public.
Is CE enforcing and ticketing aggressive dogs? To my knowledge, they are not. The only tickets I
know about have been dismissed for lack of evidence and one of the dogs ticketed was a year old
friendly puppy confined behind a fence.
An actual aggressive dog, a pit bull, twice escaped his yard and attacked dogs on leash at Duncan,
yet the owner was never ticketed and twice park goers restrained the dog but police released back
to the owner…..as did CE the 2nd time, despite complaints and followup by concerned citizens.
Seems the problem is reasonable enforcement of reasonable ordinances, not aggressive dogs, or
dog parks or off leash hours.
Note: Title 7 Chapter1 is divided between dogs and cats and animals in general. The definition of
animals in the code, excludes dogs and cats, yet the signs say All ANIMALS must be on leash and
cites a code that says Dogs and cats cannot be at large. The definition of “at Large” under animals in
general says at large is off the owner’s premises without the owner’s presence.
The contention that “dogs” hurt the parks and turf is specious at best. The mowers and the Denver
parties and Denver sports tear up the grounds. I’ve seen CE and police and party goers tear up and
leave major ruts by running their vehicles over the ball field, not to mention the drivers of park
equipment horsing around, scalping the grass, running over sprinkler heads and aluminum cans.
There are far more problems with this memo driven by staff that completely negate their
conclusions There is no valid reason for fenced dog parks or restrictions preventing people from
interacting with and playing ball with their dogs in the park. Code is clear-misbehaving dogs have to
be on leash. Yet, the most tickets are given to owners of dogs who are NOT misbehaving and cannot,
like two crippled labs laying in the grass, carted there with little children using them as pillows, or
little old toothless dogs who can’t run.
Page 155 of 268
From:C.A. Dickerson
To:Linda Olson; Rita Russell; Cheryl Wink; Dave Cuesta; Othoniel Sierra; John Stone; Joe Anderson; Shawn Lewis;
City Clerk
Subject:Re: Off leash Public forum Are there not far more important issues for Parks and Rec?
Date:Monday, July 20, 2020 9:33:42 PM
USE CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. DO NOT CLICK LINKS or OPEN
ATTACHMENTS unless you have verified the sender and know that the content is legitimate.
As a follow-up to this email about off-leash parks and staff's recommendations, I am attaching
a few pictures to show dogs that have been threatened with tickets and or given tickets for
being at large because their owner was not holding a leash in his or her hand.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020, 5:25 PM C.A. Dickerson <handsoffmyhealth47@gmail.com> wrote:
The memo issued by staff regarding “off leash” and dog parks, seems inaccurate at best, and the
statements and time line submitted are not backed up with facts or valid statistics or even
ordinances cited. It is driven by staff without rhyme nor reason, and unsupported by fact and
history
Example:
1. 2003 Bates/Logan off leash “privileges” revoked. In what way? Was there an ordinance
GRANTING off leash “privileges”? I have lived for 23 years in direct line of sight to Bates/Logan and
I never knew of any such “privilege”. Bates/Logan was always a place people played ball with their
dogs and congregated and socialized, and obedience training was done there.
2. Most of Title 7 Chapter 1A-C, regarding animals, was revised in 2008, as a result of the
Dangerous Dog task force recommendations, yet there is no mention of this task force, nor the
ordinance.
3. “complaints of aggressive dogs”. The code is clear on “aggressive dogs” though it defines them
as “at risk” and “dangerous”, both of which are “unlawful”, and such dogs if adjudicated such,
have to be leashed at all times and if “dangerous” have to wear a muzzle in public.
Is CE enforcing and ticketing aggressive dogs? To my knowledge, they are not. The only tickets I
know about have been dismissed for lack of evidence and one of the dogs ticketed was a year old
friendly puppy confined behind a fence.
An actual aggressive dog, a pit bull, twice escaped his yard and attacked dogs on leash at Duncan,
yet the owner was never ticketed and twice park goers restrained the dog but police released back
to the owner…..as did CE the 2nd time, despite complaints and followup by concerned citizens.
Seems the problem is reasonable enforcement of reasonable ordinances, not aggressive dogs, or
dog parks or off leash hours.
Note: Title 7 Chapter1 is divided between dogs and cats and animals in general. The definition of
animals in the code, excludes dogs and cats, yet the signs say All ANIMALS must be on leash and
cites a code that says Dogs and cats cannot be at large. The definition of “at Large” under animals
in general says at large is off the owner’s premises without the owner’s presence.
The contention that “dogs” hurt the parks and turf is specious at best. The mowers and the Denver
parties and Denver sports tear up the grounds. I’ve seen CE and police and party goers tear up and
leave major ruts by running their vehicles over the ball field, not to mention the drivers of park
equipment horsing around, scalping the grass, running over sprinkler heads and aluminum cans.
There are far more problems with this memo driven by staff that completely negate their
Page 156 of 268
conclusions There is no valid reason for fenced dog parks or restrictions preventing people from
interacting with and playing ball with their dogs in the park. Code is clear-misbehaving dogs have
to be on leash. Yet, the most tickets are given to owners of dogs who are NOT misbehaving and
cannot, like two crippled labs laying in the grass, carted there with little children using them as
pillows, or little old toothless dogs who can’t run.
Page 157 of 268
Page 158 of 268
Page 159 of 268
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Devin Keener, Tim Hoos
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DATE: July 20, 2020
SUBJECT:
CB 26 - Little Dry Creek Plaza Drainage and Flood Control
Improvements IGA
DESCRIPTION:
CB 26 - Approval of IGA with Urban Drainage and Flood Control District d/b/a Mile High Flood
District (MHFD) for Design and Construction of Little Dry Creek Plaza Drainage and Flood
Control Improvements
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council approve Council Bill 26 - Little Dry Creek Plaza Drainage and
Flood Control Improvements IGA.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
N/A
SUMMARY:
This proposed Intergovernmental Agreement between the Mile High Flood District (MHFD) and
the City of Englewood is for the design and construction of channel improvements on Little Dry
Creek in the area from S Broadway downstream to S Bannock St. just north of Hampden Ave.
The work will also include installation of a safety grate to cover the entrance to the culvert that
begins at the Englewood Marketplace shopping center near Bannock Street along with
associated channel modifications at the culvert entrance necessary to accommodate the safety
grate. As funding allows, channel modifications further upstream of the new grate will be
implemented to remove the concrete bottom of the former pond and restore the channel bottom
to its former natural state as shown on the attached concept drawings. The planning, design
and construction of this work will be managed by MHFD on Englewood's behalf. City staff will
provide project oversight and guidance.
ANALYSIS:
Little Dry Creek in this area was formerly a pond with a concrete bottom. The pond level was
controlled by an inflatable dam at the entrance to the box culvert that carries Little Dry Creek
through the Englewood Marketplace shopping center area. Over time, the inflatable dam
became damaged by debris in the creek flow and is no longer operational. Costs to maintain,
repair and eventually replace the inflatable dam became prohibitive therefore the decision was
made to eliminate the pond and allow Little Dry Creek flows to pass through the area without
being ponded. This has left a large, uncovered culvert opening in the Little Dry Creek Plaza
area.
Page 160 of 268
Currently having no safety grate over the exposed culvert creates two potential safety hazards.
One being the possible risk to life during flooding, and the other being clogging of the culvert
which could magnify flooding upstream. The construction of the safety grate and related
channel improvements will significantly reduce the current safety hazards that have been
created at the culvert entrance. To properly install the safety grate, landscape and channel
modifications will need to be incorporated to not only ensure its placement fits and functions
correctly, but to ensure that it is aesthetically pleasing as well.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
The total project funding is $720,000.00.for both design and construction of the safety grate and
channel modifications.
Funding Source: Contribution:
Mile High Flood District (MHFD) $360,000.00
City of Englewood $360,000.00
The attached Contract Approval Summary document provides details of the source of the City's
share of the funding for this work.
ALTERNATIVES:
Two alternatives exist for this proposed project.
1. No design or construction is to occur and project site is left alone. This would leave the safety
hazard and concerns with the aesthetics of the Englewood Marketplace pond in its current state.
The City would lose the $360,000.00 in approved matching funds from MHFD.
2. Only the safety grate is designed and constructed. This would cost the City roughly
$200,000.00 and would have aesthetic issues if not merged with a landscape design and
channel improvements. The City would lose the $360,000.00 in approved matching funds from
MHFD.
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends City Council approve this IGA with MHFD to obtain the $360,000 in matching
funds as well as project management services from MHFD for the design and construction of
this project.
ATTACHMENTS:
CB 26 Ordinance
LDC Plaza IGA MHFD
LDC Contract Approval Summary
Safety Grate Concept Design
LDC Plaza Concept Master Plan
LDC Plaza Concept Rendering
LDC Plaza Concept Before-After
Page 161 of 268
1
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. ____ COUNCIL BILL NO. 26
SERIES OF 2020 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER ______________
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL
AGREEMENT (IGA) REGARDING FINAL DESIGN, RIGHT-OF-WAY
ACQUISITION, AND CONSTRUCTION OF DRAINAGE AND FLOOD
CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS FOR LITTLE DRY CREEK AT
BROADWAY BETWEEN THE URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD.
WHEREAS, DISTRICT in a policy statement previously adopted (Resolution No. 14, Series
of 1970 and Resolution No. 11, Series of 1973), expressed an intent to assist public bodies which
have heretofore enacted floodplain zoning measures;
WHEREAS, the City and DISTRICT participated in a joint planning study titled “Major
Drainageway Planning Little Dry Creek by McCall-Ellingson & Morrill, Inc., dated February 1974
hereinafter called “PLAN”);
WHEREAS, Parties now desire to proceed with the design, right-of-way acquisition, and
construction of drainage and flood control improvements for Little Dry Creek at Broadway
(hereinafter called "PROJECT");
WHEREAS, DISTRICT’s Board of Directors has authorized DISTRICT financial
participation for PROJECT (Resolution No. 53, Series of 2020);
WHEREAS, the cost of the project is not to exceed $720,000 dollars with each Parties share
being $360,000 dollars; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Englewood and the Board of Directors of the
DISTRICT have authorized by appropriation or resolution, all of PROJECT costs of the respective
Parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of Englewood, Colorado, hereby approves the Intergovernmental
Agreement Regarding Final Design, Right-of-Way Acquisition, and Construction of Drainage and
Flood Control Improvements for Little Dry Creek at Broadway – Agreement No. 20-05.34, Project
No. 107336, between the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District and the City of Englewood, a
copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
Section 2. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign and attest, the Agreement
Regarding Final Design, Right-of-Way Acquisition, and Construction of Drainage and Flood
Control Improvements for Little Dry Creek at Broadway for the City of Englewood, for and on
behalf of the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado.
Section 3. There are no federal funds being used by Englewood on this Project.
Page 162 of 268
2
Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 20th day of July, 2020.
Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City’s official newspaper on the 23rd day of
July, 2020
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City’s official website beginning on the 22nd day of
July, 2020 for thirty (30) days.
ATTEST: Linda Olson, Mayor
Stephanie Carlile, City Clerk
I, Stephanie Carlile, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true copy of the Bill for an Ordinance introduced, read in full, and passed
on first reading on the 20th day of July, 2020.
Stephanie Carlile
Page 163 of 268
Agreement No. 20-05.34 1
AGREEMENT REGARDING
FINAL DESIGNAND CONSTRUCTION
OF DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS FOR
LITTLE DRY CREEK AT BROADWAY
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
Agreement No. 20-05.34
Project No. 107336
THIS AGREEMENT, by and between URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT D/B/A MILE HIGH FLOOD DISTRICT (hereinafter called "DISTRICT") and CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD (hereinafter called "CITY") and collectively known as "PARTIES";
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, DISTRICT, in a policy statement previously adopted (Resolution No. 14, Series of
1970 and Resolution No. 11, Series of 1973) expressed an intent to assist public bodies which have
heretofore enacted floodplain regulation measures; and
WHEREAS, PARTIES participated in a joint planning study titled "Major Drainageway Planning
Little Dry Creek" by McCall-Ellingson & Morrill, Inc., dated February 1974 (hereinafter called "PLAN");
and
WHEREAS, PARTIES now desire to proceed with the design, right-of-way acquisition, and
construction of drainage and flood control improvements for Little Dry Creek at Broadway (hereinafter
called "PROJECT"); and
WHEREAS, DISTRICT has adopted at a public hearing a Five-Year Capital Improvement
Program (Resolution No. 65, Series of 2019) for drainage and flood control facilities in which PROJECT
was included in the 2020 calendar year; and
WHEREAS, DISTRICT has heretofore adopted a Special Revenue Fund Budget for calendar year
2020 subsequent to public hearing (Resolution No. 62, Series of 2019) which includes funds for
PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, DISTRICT's Board of Directors has authorized DISTRICT financial participation for
PROJECT (Resolution No. 53, Series of 2020); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of CITY and the Board of Directors of DISTRICT have authorized,
by appropriation or resolution, all of PROJECT costs of the respective PARTIES.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, PARTIES hereto
agree as follows:
1.SCOPE OF THIS AGREEMENT
This Agreement defines the responsibilities and financial commitments of PARTIES with respect
to PROJECT.
2.SCOPE OF PROJECT
A. Final Design. PROJECT shall include the final design of improvements in accordance with
the recommendations defined in PLAN. Specifically, the final design of facilities shall
Exhibit 1
Page 164 of 268
Agreement No. 20-05.34 2
extend along Little Dry Creek from approximately Cherokee to Bannock, as shown on
Exhibit A.
B. Construction. PROJECT shall include construction by DISTRICT of the drainage and flood
control improvements as set forth in the final design and vegetation establishment.
3. PUBLIC NECESSITY
PARTIES agree that the work performed pursuant to this Agreement is necessary for the health,
safety, comfort, convenience, and welfare of all the people of the State, and is of particular benefit
to the inhabitants of PARTIES and to their property therein.
4. PROJECT COSTS AND ALLOCATION OF COSTS
A. PARTIES agree that for the purposes of this Agreement PROJECT costs shall consist of and
be limited to the following:
1. Final design services;
2. Delineation, description and acquisition of required rights-of-way/easements;
3. Construction of improvements;
4. Contingencies mutually agreeable to PARTIES.
B. It is understood that PROJECT costs as defined above are not to exceed $720,000 without
amendment to this Agreement.
PROJECT costs for the various elements of the effort are estimated as follows:
ITEM AMOUNT
1. Final Design $ 720,000
2. Construction $ -0-
3. Contingency $ -0-
Grand Total $ 720,000
This breakdown of costs is for estimating purposes only. Costs may vary between the
various elements of the effort without amendment to this Agreement provided the total
expenditures do not exceed the maximum contribution by all PARTIES plus accrued
interest, if applicable.
C. Based on total PROJECT costs, the maximum percent and dollar contribution by each party
shall be:
Percentage Maximum
Share Contribution
DISTRICT 50.00% $360,000
CITY 50.00% $360,000
TOTAL 100.00% $720,000
5. MANAGEMENT OF FINANCES
As set forth in DISTRICT policy (Resolution No. 11, Series of 1973, Resolution No. 49, Series of
1977, and Resolution No. 37, Series of 2009), the funding of a local body's one-half share may
Page 165 of 268
Agreement No. 20-05.34 3
come from its own revenue sources or from funds received from state, federal, or other sources of
funding without limitation and without prior DISTRICT approval.
Payment of each party's full share (CITY - $360,000; DISTRICT - $360,000) shall be made to
DISTRICT subsequent to execution of this Agreement and within 30 days of request for payment
by DISTRICT. The payments by PARTIES shall be held by DISTRICT in a special fund to pay
for increments of PROJECT as authorized by PARTIES, and as defined herein. DISTRICT shall
provide a periodic accounting of PROJECT funds as well as a periodic notification to CITY of any
unpaid obligations. Any interest earned by the monies contributed by PARTIES shall be accrued
to the special fund established by DISTRICT for PROJECT and such interest shall be used only for
PROJECT upon approval by the contracting officers (Paragraph 13).
Within one year of completion of PROJECT if there are monies including interest earned
remaining which are not committed, obligated, or disbursed, each party shall receive a share of
such monies, which shares shall be computed as were the original shares; or, at CITY request,
CITY share of remaining monies shall be transferred to another special fund held by DISTRICT.
6. FINAL DESIGN
The contracting officers for PARTIES, as defined under Paragraph 13 of this Agreement, shall
select an engineer mutually agreeable to both PARTIES. DISTRICT shall contract with selected
engineer and shall supervise and coordinate the final design including right-of-way delineation
subject to approval of the contracting officer for CITY. Payment for final design services shall be
made by DISTRICT as the work progresses from the PROJECT fund established as set forth
above.
Final design services shall consist of, but not be limited to, the following:
A. Preparation of a work plan schedule identifying the timing of major elements in the design;
B. Delineation of required right-of-way/easements;
C. Preparation of detailed construction plans and specifications;
D. Preparation of an estimate of probable construction costs of the work covered by the plans
and specifications;
E. Preparation of an appropriate construction schedule.
DISTRICT shall provide any written work product by the engineer to CITY.
7. OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTY AND LIMITATION OF USE
PARTIES acknowledge that CITY owns the property on which PROJECT is constructed either in
fee or non-revocable easement and shall be responsible for same. It is specifically understood that
the right-of-way is being used for drainage and flood control purposes. The properties upon which
PROJECT is constructed shall not be used for any purpose that shall diminish or preclude its use
for drainage and flood control purposes. CITY may not dispose of or change the use of the
properties to diminish or preclude its use for drainage and flood control purposes without approval
of DISTRICT, which shall not be unreasonably withheld.
Page 166 of 268
Agreement No. 20-05.34 4
If, in the future, CITY disposes of any portion of or all of the properties acquired upon which
PROJECT is constructed pursuant to this Agreement; changes the use to diminish or preclude its
use for drainage and flood control purposes of any portion or all of the properties upon which
PROJECT is constructed pursuant to this Agreement; or modifies any of the improvements located
on any portion of the properties upon which PROJECT is constructed to diminish or preclude its
use for drainage and flood control purposes pursuant to this Agreement; and CITY has not obtained
the written approval of DISTRICT prior to such action, CITY shall take any and all action
necessary to reverse said unauthorized activity and return the properties and improvements thereon,
acquired and constructed pursuant to this Agreement, to the ownership and condition they were in
immediately prior to the unauthorized activity at CITY's sole expense. However, CITY shall not be
responsible for the actions of third parties that would violate the provisions of this Paragraph who
may have legal rights in the property as long as CITY has taken reasonable action to stop those
actions. In the event CITY breaches the terms and provisions of this Paragraph 7 and does not
voluntarily cure as set forth above, DISTRICT shall have the right to pursue a claim against CITY
for specific performance of this portion of the Agreement.
8. MANAGEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION
A. Costs. Construction costs shall consist of those costs as incurred by the most qualified
contractor(s) including detour costs, licenses and permits, utility relocations, and
construction related engineering services as defined in Paragraph 4 of this Agreement.
B. Construction Management and Payment
1. DISTRICT, with the concurrence of CITY, shall administer and coordinate the
construction-related work as provided herein.
2. DISTRICT, with concurrence of CITY, shall select and award construction
contract(s).
3. DISTRICT shall require the contractor to provide adequate liability insurance that
includes CITY. The contractor shall be required to indemnify CITY. Copies of the
insurance coverage shall be provided to CITY.
4. DISTRICT, with assistance of CITY, shall coordinate field surveying; staking;
inspection; testing; acquisition of right-of-way; and engineering as required to
construct PROJECT. DISTRICT, with assistance of CITY, shall assure that
construction is performed in accordance with the construction contract documents
including approved plans and specifications and shall accurately record the quantities
and costs relative thereto. Copies of all inspection reports shall be furnished to CITY
on a weekly basis. DISTRICT shall retain an engineer to perform all or a part of these
duties.
5. DISTRICT, with concurrence of CITY, shall contract with and provide the services of
the design engineer for basic engineering construction services to include addendum
Page 167 of 268
Agreement No. 20-05.34 5
preparation; survey control points; explanatory sketches; revisions of contract plans;
shop drawing review; as-built plans; weekly inspection of work; and final inspection.
6. PARTIES shall have access to the site during construction at all times to observe the
progress of work and conformance to construction contract documents including plans
and specifications.
7. DISTRICT shall review and approve contractor billings. DISTRICT shall remit
payment to contractor based on billings.
8. DISTRICT, with concurrence of CITY, shall prepare and issue all written change or
work orders to the contract documents.
9. PARTIES shall jointly conduct a final inspection and accept or reject the completed
PROJECT in accordance with the contract documents.
10. DISTRICT shall provide CITY a set of reproducible "as-built" plans.
C. Construction Change Orders. In the event that it becomes necessary and advisable to change
the scope or detail of the work to be performed under the contract(s), such changes shall be
rejected or approved in writing by the contracting officers. No change orders shall be
approved that increase the costs beyond the funds available in the PROJECT fund, including
interest earned on those funds, unless and until the additional funds needed to pay for the
added costs are committed by all PARTIES.
9. MAINTENANCE
PARTIES agree that CITY shall own and be responsible for maintenance of the completed and
accepted PROJECT. PARTIES further agree that DISTRICT, at CITY's request, shall assist CITY
with the maintenance of all facilities constructed or modified by virtue of this Agreement to the
extent possible depending on availability of DISTRICT funds. Such maintenance assistance shall
be limited to drainage and flood control features of PROJECT. Maintenance assistance may
include activities such as keeping flow areas free and clear of debris and silt, keeping culverts free
of debris and sediment, repairing drainage and flood control structures such as drop structures and
energy dissipaters, and clean-up measures after periods of heavy runoff. The specific nature of the
maintenance assistance shall be set forth in a memorandum of understanding from DISTRICT to
CITY, upon acceptance of DISTRICT's annual Maintenance Work Program.
DISTRICT shall have right-of-access to right-of-way and storm drainage improvements at all times
for observation of flood control facility conditions and for maintenance when funds are available.
10. FLOODPLAIN REGULATION
CITY agrees to regulate and control the floodplain of Little Dry Creek within CITY in the manner
prescribed by the National Flood Insurance Program and prescribed regulations thereto as a
minimum.
PARTIES understand and agree, however, that CITY cannot obligate itself by contract to exercise
its police powers. If CITY fails to regulate the floodplain of Little Dry Creek within CITY in the
Page 168 of 268
Agreement No. 20-05.34 6
manner prescribed by the National Flood Insurance Program and prescribed regulations thereto as a
minimum, DISTRICT may exercise its power to do so and CITY shall cooperate fully.
11. TERM OF AGREEMENT
The term of this Agreement shall commence upon the earlier of the date of final execution by all
PARTIES and shall terminate three (3) years after the final payment is made to the construction
contractor and the final accounting of funds on deposit at DISTRICT is provided to all PARTIES
pursuant to Paragraph 5 herein, except for Paragraph 10. FLOODPLAIN REGULATION,
Paragraph 7. OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTY AND LIMITATION OF USE, and Paragraph 9.
MAINTENANCE, which shall run in perpetuity.
12. LIABILITY
Each party hereto shall be responsible for any suits, demands, costs or actions at law resulting from
its own acts or omissions and may insure against such possibilities as appropriate.
13. CONTRACTING OFFICERS
A. The contracting officer for CITY shall be the Mayor, 1000 Englewood Parkway, Englewood,
Colorado 80110.
B. The contracting officer for DISTRICT shall be the Executive Director, 2480 West 26th
Avenue, Suite 156B, Denver, Colorado 80211.
C. The contracting officers for PARTIES each agree to designate and assign a PROJECT
representative to act on the behalf of said PARTIES in all matters related to PROJECT
undertaken pursuant to this Agreement. Each representative shall coordinate all
PROJECT-related issues between PARTIES, shall attend all progress meetings, and shall be
responsible for providing all available PROJECT-related file information to the engineer
upon request by DISTRICT or CITY. Said representatives shall have the authority for all
approvals, authorizations, notices or concurrences required under this Agreement. However,
in regard to any amendments or addenda to this Agreement, said representative shall be
responsible to promptly obtain the approval of the proper authority.
14. RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTIES
DISTRICT shall be responsible for coordinating with CITY the information developed by the
various consultants hired by DISTRICT and for obtaining all concurrences from CITY needed to
complete PROJECT in a timely manner. CITY agrees to review all concept plans, preliminary
design plans, and final plans and specifications; and to provide comments within 21 calendar days
after the drafts have been provided by DISTRICT to CITY.
15. AMENDMENTS
This Agreement contains all of the terms agreed upon by and among PARTIES. Any amendments
to this Agreement shall be in writing and executed by PARTIES hereto to be valid and binding.
16. SEVERABILITY
If any clause or provision herein contained shall be adjudged to be invalid or unenforceable by a
court of competent jurisdiction or by operation of any applicable law, such invalid or unenforceable
Page 169 of 268
Agreement No. 20-05.34 7
clause or provision shall not affect the validity of the Agreement as a whole and all other clauses or
provisions shall be given full force and effect.
17. APPLICABLE LAWS
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Colorado. Jurisdiction for any and all legal actions regarding this Agreement shall be in the State
of Colorado and venue for the same shall lie in the CITY where PROJECT is located.
18. ASSIGNABILITY
No party to this Agreement shall assign or transfer any of its rights or obligations hereunder
without the prior written consent of the nonassigning party or parties to this Agreement.
19. BINDING EFFECT
The provisions of this Agreement shall bind and shall inure to the benefit of PARTIES hereto and
to their respective successors and permitted assigns.
20. ENFORCEABILITY
PARTIES hereto agree and acknowledge that this Agreement may be enforced in law or in equity,
by decree of specific performance or damages, or such other legal or equitable relief as may be
available subject to the provisions of the laws of the State of Colorado.
21. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement may be terminated upon thirty (30) days’ written notice by any party to this
Agreement, but only if there are no contingent, outstanding contracts. If there are contingent,
outstanding contracts, this Agreement may only be terminated upon the cancellation of all
contingent, outstanding contracts. All costs associated with the cancellation of the contingent
contracts shall be shared between PARTIES in the same ratio(s) as were their contributions.
22. PUBLIC RELATIONS
It shall be at CITY's sole discretion to initiate and to carry out any public relations program to
inform the residents in PROJECT area as to the purpose of PROJECT and what impact it may have
on them. Technical information shall be presented to the public by the selected engineer. In any
event DISTRICT shall have no responsibility for a public relations program, but shall assist CITY
as needed and appropriate.
23. NO DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT
In connection with the performance of work under this Agreement, PARTIES agree not to refuse to
hire, discharge, promote or demote, or to discriminate in matters of compensation against any
person otherwise qualified because of race, color, ancestry, creed, religion, national origin, gender,
age, military status, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, or physical or mental
disability and further agree to insert the foregoing provision in all subcontracts hereunder.
24. APPROPRIATIONS
Notwithstanding any other term, condition, or provision herein, each and every obligation of CITY
and/or DISTRICT stated in this Agreement is subject to the requirement of a prior appropriation of
funds therefore by the appropriate governing body of CITY and/or DISTRICT.
Page 170 of 268
Agreement No. 20-05.34 8
25. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES
It is expressly understood and agreed that enforcement of the terms and conditions of this
Agreement, and all rights of action relating to such enforcement, shall be strictly reserved to
PARTIES, and nothing contained in this Agreement shall give or allow any such claim or right of
action by any other or third person on such Agreement. It is the express intention of PARTIES that
any person or party other than any one of PARTIES receiving services or benefits under this
Agreement shall be deemed to be an incidental beneficiary only.
26. ILLEGAL ALIENS
PARTIES agree that any public contract for services executed as a result of this intergovernmental
agreement shall prohibit the employment of illegal aliens in compliance with §8-17.5-101 C.R.S. et
seq. The following language shall be included in any contract for public services:
A. At the time of execution of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR does not knowingly employ or
contract with an illegal alien who will perform work under this Agreement.
B. CONTRACTOR shall participate in the E-Verify Program, as defined in § 8 17.5-101(3.7),
C.R.S., to confirm the employment eligibility of all employees who are newly hired for
employment to perform work under this Agreement.
C. CONTRACTOR shall not knowingly employ or contract with an illegal alien to perform
work under this Agreement.
D. CONTRACTOR shall not enter into a contractor with a subconsultant or subcontractor that
fails to certify to CONTRACTOR that it shall not knowingly employ or contact with an
illegal alien to perform work under this Agreement.
E. CONTRACTOR shall confirm the employment eligibility of all employees who are newly
hired for employment to perform work under this Agreement through participation in the E-
Verify Program.
F. CONTRACTOR is prohibited from using the E-Verify Program procedures to undertake
pre-employment screening of job applicants while performing its obligation under this
Agreement, and that otherwise requires CONTRACTOR to comply with any and all federal
requirements related to use of the E-Verify Program including, by way of example, all
program requirements related to employee notification and preservation of employee rights.
G. If CONTRACTOR obtains actual knowledge that a subconsultant or subcontractor
performing work under this Agreement knowingly employs or contract with an illegal alien,
it will notify such subconsultant or subcontractor and PARTIES within three (3) days.
CONTRACTOR shall also then terminate such subconsultant or subcontractor if within three
(3) days after such notice the subconsultant or subcontractor does not stop employing or
contracting with the illegal alien, unless during such three (3) day period the subconsultant
or subcontractor provides information to establish that the subconsultant or subcontractor has
not knowingly employed or contracted with an illegal alien.
Page 171 of 268
Agreement No. 20-05.34 9
H. CONTRACTOR shall comply with any reasonable request made in the course of an
investigation by the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment under authority of § 8-
17.5-102(5), C.R.S.
I. CONTRACTOR shall, within twenty days after hiring an employee who is newly hired for
employment to perform work under this Agreement, affirms that it has examined the legal
work status of such employees, retained file copies of the documents required by 8 U.S.C.
Section 1324a, and not altered or falsified the identification documents for such employees.
CONTRACTOR shall provide a written, notarized copy of the affirmation to PARTIES.
27. GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITIES
PARTIES hereto intend that nothing herein shall be deemed or construed as a waiver by any party
of any rights, limitations, or protections afforded to them under the Colorado Governmental
Immunity Act (§ 24-10-101, et seq., C.R.S.) as now or hereafter amended or otherwise available at
law or equity.
28. INTENT OF AGREEMENT
Except as otherwise stated herein, this Agreement is intended to describe the rights and
responsibilities of and between PARTIES and is not intended to and shall not be deemed to confer
rights upon any person or entities not named as PARTIES, nor to limit in any way the powers and
responsibilities of the CITY, the DISTRICT or any other entity not a party hereto.
29. EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS – ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES
This Agreement, and all subsequent documents requiring the signatures of PARTIES to this
Agreement, may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. PARTIES approve the use
of electronic signatures for execution of this Agreement, and all subsequent documents requiring
the signatures of PARTIES to this Agreement. Only the following two forms of electronic
signatures shall be permitted to bind PARTIES to this Agreement, and all subsequent documents
requiring the signatures of PARTIES to this Agreement.
A. Electronic or facsimile delivery of a fully executed copy of a signature page; or
B. The image of the signature of an authorized signer inserted onto PDF format documents.
Documents requiring notarization may also be notarized by electronic signature, as provided
above. All use of electronic signatures shall be governed by the Uniform Electronic Transactions
Act, CRS §§ 24-71.3-101 to -121.
WHEREFORE, PARTIES hereto have caused this instrument to be executed by properly
authorized signatories as of the date and year written below.
Page 172 of 268
Agreement No. 20-05.34 10
URBAN DRAINAGE AND
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT D/B/A
MILE HIGH FLOOD DISTRICT
By
___________ Name Ken A. MacKenzie
Checked By
Title Executive Director
Date
Page 173 of 268
Agreement No. 20-05.34 11
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
By
Name
Title
Date
Page 174 of 268
AGREEMENT REGARDING
FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
OF DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS FOR
LITTLE DRY CREEK AT BROADWAY
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
Agreement No. 20-05.34
Project No. 107336
Exhibit A
Page 175 of 268
Contract Approval Summary
10/11/2019
Page | 1
Contact Identification Information (to be completed by the City Clerk)
ID number: Authorizing Resolution/Ordinance:
Recording Information:
City Contact Information
Staff Contact Person: Tim Hoos Phone: (303) 257-0967
Title: Capital Projects and Engineering Manager Email: thoos@englewoodco.gov
Vendor Contact Information
Vendor Name:
Mile High Flood District (MHFD)
Vendor Contact:
Jon Villines
Vendor Address: 2480 W. 26th Ave. Suite
156-B
Vendor Phone: (303) 455-6277
City: Denver Vendor Email: jvillines@udfcd.org
State: CO Zip Code: 80211
Contract Type
Contract Type:Intergovernmental Agreement
Description of Contract Work/Services:
Attachments:
☒Contract -- ☐Original ☒Copy
☐Addendum(s)
☒Exhibit(s)
☐Certificate of Insurance Summary of Terms:
Start Date: TBD End Date: TBD Total Years of Term: n/a
Total Amount of Contract for term (or estimated amount
if based on item pricing):
$360,000.00
If Amended: Original Amount
$
Amendment Amount
$
Total as Amended:
$
Renewal options available:
Payment terms (please
describe terms or attach
schedule if based on
deliverables):
MHFD will be reimbursed at end of project for work
completed at 50% of the cost-share up to a total of
$360,000.00.
Attachments:
☐Copy of original Contract if this is an amendment
The City of Englewood and the Mile High Flood District (MHFD) will enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement to fund and construct a safety grate and improvements along
Little Dry Creek at the Englewood Marketplace downstream of Broadway. Both parties shall
contribute $360,000.00 for a total project cost not to exceed $720,000.00. The MHFD will
assume the role of leading this project’s design and construction.
Page 176 of 268
Contract Approval Summary
10/11/2019
Page | 2
☒Copies of related Contracts/Conveyances/Documents
Source of funds:
Attachment (For Capital Items Only / Expense Line Item Detail is Located in Open Gov):
☐Prior Month-End Project Status and Fund Balance Report
Process for Choosing Vendor:
☐Bid: ☐ Bid Evaluation Summary attached
☐ Bid Response of proposed awardee
☐RFP: ☐ RFP Evaluation Summary attached
☐ RFP Response of proposed awardee
☐Quotes: Copy of Quotes attached
☐Sole Source: Explain Need below
☒Other: Please describe
The MHFD has matching funds for each city in their District to tap into for stream
and channel restoration purposes. The City of Englewood met at the project site
with a representative from the MHFD in late 2019, in which the idea of an IGA
was floated. The MHFD obtained landscape and safety grate plans from the City
to determine the match they could allot for the 2020 fiscal year. The MHFD voted
on a resolution to approved a match of $360,000.00 after budget discussions with
the City of Englewood’s Public Works Department.
Page 177 of 268
Page 178 of 268
Q
PLAYGROUND FEATURES
3
I RAILI ITURE
CREEK CROSSING ALLOWS
FOR LOOPED TRAIL
(LOW PROFILE TO NOT
IMPACT 100YR.
FLOOD EVENT)
SHRUB PLANTINGS TO
BETTER SCREEN
REMOVE EXISTING GUARD RAIL
AND REPLACE WITH DECORATIVE WALL
WITH COLUMNS AT PARK ENTRANCE
PROPOSED CANOPY TREES
ALONG WALLS
ADJACENT
CREATE OPENINGS IN EXISTING /'CONTEMPORARY STYLE SHADE
PARKING I-0T SHELTER WITH PICNIC TABLES
BACKLESS BENCHES WALLS FOR DIRECT AccEss To
STEPS To EDGE /
AROUND SCULPTURE CREEK.ADD GRAND sTAIRcAsE
FOR BETTER CoNNEc1'|V|1'Y OF WATER WALK CONNECTION WITH
SCULPTURAL SHADE BETWEEN spAcEs /T STAIRS FROM BROADWAY
SHELTER WITH
PICNIC TABLES MAINTAIN EXISTING FLAGSTONE
WALLS.POWER WASH,ETC.TO
REMOVE WATER DEPOSITS.
POSSIBLY MODIFY CURVE IN
WALL TO REPLACE RAILINGS.
VARY WIDTH OF CREEK CHANNEL
TERRACED SANDSTONE
BOULDER WALLS FOR
SEATING ALONG GRASS
SLOPE
BURY RIP-RAP,PLANT WITH
SHRUBS OR RIPARIAN GRASSES
FLOWERS BEHIND WALL FOR
SEASONAL COLOR.CONVERT
WATER FEATURE INTO
PLANTER.UTILIZE EXISTING
STONE AND BOULDER
WALLS
EXTEND PAVING UP TO
EDGE OF WALL FOR
CREEK OVERLOOK,ADD
DECORATIVE RAILING
TABLES WITH UMBRELLAS
LOW FLOWERING ORNAMENTAL
TREES -PRESERVE EXISTING
SIGHT LINES TO BUILDINGS
SCULPTURAL PLAYGROUND
FOR KIDS AGES 5-12
(ON POURED IN PLACE
SURFACING)
DECORATIVE
PAVERS
EXISTING TRAIL
REMOVE EXISTING WATERFALL
ON SLOPE,PRUNE BACK
OVERGROWN VEGETATION
BOULDERS FOR INFORMAL STAIRS
POSSIBLE SCULPTURE
VISIBLE FROM
HAMPDEN AVE.
ExIsTING STEPS
AND PLANTINGS \
To REMAIN
ENHANCES SHRUB AND
ADA CREEK ACCESS
BOULDERS FOR 2+I-WATER
FALL -PROVIDES SOUNDPRESERVEEXISTINGREMOVEEXISTINGPOCKETSOF'
PLANTINGS 'sANDsToNE STEPS SEATING ALoNG 'BREAK IN 2-3 AREAS ACCESS TO CHANNEL 0 10 20 40
SCULPTURAL «NATURE»PLAYGROUND To wATER EDGE OF WATER FOR EASY ACCESS TO ExIsTING BENCHES mg
FOR KIDS AGEs 2-5 (ON POURED IN POSSIBLE SCULPTURE CREEK A'-°NG TRAIL
SCALE ,.=2o._o.
p._AcE SURFACING)oN BUMP-OUT WITH HAM P D E N AVE.NEw LIGHT POLES,
DECORATIVE PAVING TYP.
Theme-“Creek |ntegration”
-Maintain and enhance existing flagstone walls providing updated appearance -Provide stronger direct connection between upper plaza and creek with formal stairs.
(remove old water spouts,concrete pools and railings).-Provide additional trail connection from upper plaza to the east creating a looped trail
-Creek channel to vary in width and have more natural appearance with pockets of riparian including steps down to edge of creek.
plants and bluegrass turf up to edge of water near upper and west plazas for visual interest -Enhance west plaza with contemporary seat walls,new paving materials,shelter and
and sound.themed playground.
-Provide additional boulder drop structure -Extend west plaza up to edge of wall and provide seating that overlooks creek.
-Provide more contemporary site furnishings,light fixtures,railings,etc.-Enhance east plaza with shade shelter,picnic tables,terraced walls and direct access pathCONCEPTUALMASTERPLAN
LITTLE DRY CREEK PLAZA IIIIIIIII §E§g"."c'3c'?
I'.1'EN'$®ENGLEWOOD,COLORADO JULY2o.2o18
Page 179 of 268
3,3 MERRICK®
EIDIII &COIVIPANYLITTLEDRYCREEKPLAZA
ENGLEWOOD,COLORADO JULY2o.2o18
Page 180 of 268
7.1;‘:wmu (7
I
gUgMERnIcK®LITTLE DRY CREEK PLAZA I:nI:&CoMPANY
ENGLEWOOD,COLORADO JULY20.2018
Page 181 of 268
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Heather Driscoll, Maria Sobota
DEPARTMENT: Finance
DATE: July 20, 2020
SUBJECT:
CB 28 - IGA with State Department of Revenue: Sales and Use
Tax Software (SUTS System)
DESCRIPTION:
CB 28 - IGA with State Department of Revenue pertaining to the Sales and Use Tax Software
(SUTS System)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council approve Council Bill 28, authorizing an Intergovernmental
Agreement (IGA) with the State of Colorado's Department of Revenue. The IGA will allow
taxpayers the opportunity to file tax returns in a single application within the State's Sales and
Use Tax Software (SUTS System).
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
None
SUMMARY:
Entering into the IGA will allow City of Englewood taxpayers to use the State of Colorado's
SUTS system. The intent of the IGA does not supersede Home Rule Authority. By gaining
access, the following benefits will be shared by citizens and the City:
• Single point of entry - taxpayers can enter and file returns and make payments for all
municipalities in which they have a presence
• Recognition of participation will reflected in the new free GIS tax rate lookup
• Ease of use encouraging voluntary compliance
ANALYSIS:
By joining the State's SUTS system, remittance of sales and use taxes for large/out of state
vendors will be easier and harder to oppose legally. It is anticipated that more taxpayers will
come into compliance and that there will be a corresponding increase in revenue.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
The anticipated revenue gains are difficult to measure as it is unknown how many vendors will
become compliant by using the SUTS system. The cost to the City is $1 per banking day for the
ACH transfer of funds from the State to the City (roughly $260 a year). The City will also
recognize a small savings generated as taxpayers migrate from the City's Muni-Revs site to the
SUTS system.
Page 182 of 268
ALTERNATIVES:
The City can choose to not join the SUTS system. However, doing so could lead to limiting
revenue collections now and in the future from vendors.
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that Council approve the IGA with the State as the benefits are in the City's
and taxpayer's favor.
ATTACHMENTS:
Council Bill #28
SUTS IGA agreement
Page 183 of 268
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. ____ COUNCIL BILL NO. 28
SERIES OF 2020 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF
REVENUE AND THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD FOR THE COLLECTION
OF MUNICIPAL TAXES UNDER THE SUTS (“SALES AND USE TAX
SOFTWARE”) SYSTEM
WHEREAS, Article XIV, Section 18(2)(a) of the Constitution of the State of Colorado,
and Part 2, Article 1, Title 29, C.R.S. encourages and authorizes intergovernmental agreements;
WHEREAS, Sections 29-1-203 and 29-1-203.5, C.R.S. authorize governments to
cooperate and contract with one another to provide any function, service, or facility lawfully
authorized to each;
WHEREAS, under SB19-006, the Colorado Legislature authorized the state to create a
Sales and Use Tax Software system ("SUTS") to facilitate the central collection of municipal sales
and use taxes on behalf of home rule municipalities and taxpayers;
WHEREAS, the City of Englewood as a local taxing jurisdiction is allowed to participate
in the SUTS, and at this time wishes to participate in said system for the benefit of both taxpayers
collecting businesses sales and use tax and the City of Englewood;
WHEREAS, all funds deposited by a taxpayer in the SUTS system remain the property of
the municipality for which they are designated; and
WHEREAS, use of this system will provide simplicity to taxpayers and efficiency for the
City of Englewood;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes the
Intergovernmental Agreement entitled Agreement Regarding Department of Revenue Sales and
Use Tax Software (“SUTS”), between the Colorado Department of Revenue and the City of
Englewood, a copy of which is marked as “Exhibit A” and attached hereto.
Section 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Intergovernmental Agreement for
and on behalf of the City of Englewood, Colorado, attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Page 184 of 268
Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 20th day of July, 2020.
Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City’s official newspaper on the 23th
day of July, 2020.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City’s official website beginning on the 22nd
day of July, 2020 for thirty (30) days.
__________________________________
Linda Olson, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Stephanie Carlile, City Clerk
I, Stephanie Carlile, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that
the above and foregoing is a true copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by
Title as Ordinance No. ___, Series of 2020.
___________________________________
Stephanie Carlile
Page 185 of 268
AGREEMENT REGARDING DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE SALES AND
USE TAX SOFTWARE (“SUTS SYSTEM”)
This agreement regarding the SUTS System (“Agreement”) is entered
between the Colorado Department of Revenue (“CDOR”) and the undersigned home
rule local taxing jurisdiction (“Jurisdiction,”collectively,“the Parties”) for the
purposes of permitting access to the SUTS System and its related tax information
look up tool as described in this Agreement. The SUTS System permits the
acceptance of returns and processing of payments for the sales and use tax levied by
the state and any local taxing jurisdictions in accord with the objectives of
SB19-006. To further those objectives here, the Parties agree to the following:
AGREEMENT
CDOR grants Jurisdiction access to the SUTS System for Jurisdiction’s use in
the collection and payment of Sales and Use tax under the terms set forth in this
Agreement.
A.Purpose of Agreement
Pursuant to Senate Bill 19-006, CDOR has contracted with vendors, including at
this time, MUNIRevs, Inc. and Transaction Tax Resources, Inc., Fast Enterprises,
LLC, and others, which may change from time to time (collectively, “Vendors”) to
provide a sales and use tax simplification system that allows taxpayers to look up
and remit sales and use taxes through a single portal managed by Vendors and held
in trust for the benefit of the Jurisdiction.
B.Definitions
1)“Confidential Information” means any information derived from the SUTS
System, including but not limited to taxpayer information, return information, and
“personally identifiable information,” as defined in section 24-73-101(4) (b), C.R.S.
2)A "Security Incident," has the meaning set forth in section 24-37.5-402(10),
C.R.S., which is “an accidental or deliberate event that results in or constitutes an
imminent threat of the unauthorized access, loss, disclosure, modification,
disruption, or destruction of communication and information resources. Security
incidents include but are not limited to: a) detection of a virus, worm, malware, etc;
b) unauthorized use of an information resource; c) unauthorized modification of an
information resource; d) theft or diversion of an information resource; e) theft or
diversion of property using an information resource, and f) vandalism or other
damage to an information resource.”
Exhibit A
Page 186 of 268
3) “Taxpayer”means any individual or business required to remit sales or use
taxes to a taxing jurisdiction.
4) “Sales and Use Tax”means sales and use tax collected by Taxpayers and
remitted to a jurisdiction by Taxpayers.Sales and Use Tax does not include excise
taxes or other taxes or fees that a jurisdiction requires taxpayers to pay.
C. Confidentiality.
1)CDOR agrees to continually maintain a secure place in which Confidential
Information will be stored,regardless of whether Confidential Information is in
physical or electronic form and will restrict access to Confidential Information to
persons whose duties and responsibilities require such access.All third-party
contractors who need such access for purposes consistent with this Agreement shall
sign confidentiality agreements with CDOR or Jurisdiction no less restrictive than
the confidentiality terms of this Agreement.
2)Except as may be ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction,no
Confidential Information obtained pursuant to this Agreement shall be disclosed by
CDOR or Jurisdiction to any person or entity not authorized to receive such
information by the laws of the Jurisdiction or the State of Colorado.
3)If CDOR or Jurisdiction is served with a request for Confidential
Information,CDOR or Jurisdiction shall use reasonable efforts to provide notice to
the other Party within such time that CDOR or Jurisdiction may intervene and
seek a protective order or other relief if it so chooses.
4)The information obtained pursuant to this Agreement shall be used only for
the purpose of administration and enforcement of the sales and/or use tax laws of
the Jurisdiction or the State of Colorado.
5)Nothing in this agreement shall prevent a Jurisdiction from contacting their
Taxpayers for auditing or other purposes.
6)If either party becomes aware of any Security Incident,they shall notify the
other immediately and cooperate with one another regarding recovery,remediation,
and the necessity to involve law enforcement.
D. Payments of Taxes to Jurisdiction.
1)All funds deposited by a Taxpayer shall be and shall remain the property of
Jurisdiction held in trust until transferred to Jurisdiction.Deposited remittances
2
Page 187 of 268
shall be transferred to Jurisdiction as soon as the funds have settled with the SUTS
bank following NACHA guidelines.
2)If any Taxpayer payment is returned via an ACH or credit card charge-back
against the account past the settlement process above,that Jurisdiction will pay
applicable amounts back to the SUTS System within five banking days of
notification of return.
E. Data and Reports.
1)Jurisdiction will have access to all information from tax forms processed in
the SUTS System that involve transactions within the Jurisdiction via CSV file
downloads, PDF files or some other manner that is mutually acceptable.
2)The following reports will be available to Jurisdiction under the SUTS
System:
a)Assessment Report:This report shows all assessments,by business
and includes several filters.
b)Form Data Report:The form data report provides the ability to see all
data for a taxpayer’s form (e.g., gross sales through all deductions).
c)Business Comparison Reports by Month:Allows review of trends over
time for particular businesses, or an audience of businesses.
d)Business Contact Report.
e)Missing Account Number Report for validating Jurisdiction’s Local
Account Number for each registered account in the SUTS System.
F. Support.
CDOR will provide Taxpayer user support during regular,published State business
hours.Support to Jurisdiction’s administrative users for system questions is
provided by Vendor specialists who will be available by email and phone Monday
through Friday from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Mountain Time,excluding Federal and
State Holidays.
G. Retention of Data.
The SUTS System will retain,for a minimum of three years,all data,records,
returns,and information:a)submitted by Taxpayers to the SUTS System,b)
derived from Taxpayer submissions, and c) transferred to Jurisdiction.
H. System Failure.
If the SUTS System becomes disabled,CDOR will use good faith and reasonable
3
Page 188 of 268
efforts to recover the system and all Jurisdiction data not already in the possession
of Jurisdiction This recovery of the SUTS System and data will be conducted at no
additional cost to Jurisdiction.
I. Reservation of Rights.
The software,workflow processes,user interface,designs,know-how and other
services and technologies which are the sole property provided by Vendors as part of
the SUTS System and CDOR’s agreements with Vendors will remain with Vendors
and Jurisdiction will not have any right,title or interest in or to such items,
including all associated intellectual property rights.
J. Restrictions on Use of The SUTS System.
1)Jurisdiction may not a)sell,resell,rent or lease the SUTS System,b)use the
SUTS System to store or transmit infringing,unsolicited marketing emails,
libelous,or otherwise unlawful or tortious material,or to store or transmit
material in violation of third-party rights,c)interfere with or disrupt the
integrity or performance of the SUTS System,or d)attempt to gain
unauthorized access to the SUTS System or its related systems or networks.
2)Jurisdiction may allow its third-party contractors to use the SUTS System
solely on behalf of and for the benefit of Jurisdiction and only in compliance
with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.Jurisdiction is responsible
for compliance with the terms of this Agreement by its contractors.
K. Initial Setup.
Jurisdiction shall furnish the following items in order to use the SUTS System:
1)Jurisdiction Depository Information:Jurisdiction will provide bank deposit
information (routing &account number)to CDOR’s appropriate Vendors
within 5 days of signing this Agreement.This information will be utilized for
the deposits of taxes,penalties,and interest from the SUTS System.It is the
responsibility of Jurisdiction to provide updated depository information
should this account need to be changed at any point in time.
2)Initial Account Number Validation:Jurisdiction will upload their local
account numbers for their Taxpayers to the SUTS System using the SUTS
standard upload format (e.g.Excel,CSV)as soon as is reasonable after
signing this Agreement.CDOR will use this information to validate account
numbers for businesses registering on the SUTS System with actual account
4
Page 189 of 268
numbers for each jurisdiction for accurate account information on SUTS
System tax returns.
3)The local account numbers will include the Taxpayer’s account number,
business name,dba,FEIN#,address and any other contact information or the
SUTS System to validate and match the registered account to Jurisdiction’s
account number.
4)The SUTS System will not activate for Jurisdiction for tax receipts until the
Existing Account Number Data File has been provided to CDOR,imported to
the SUTS System and validated by Vendor.
5)It is the responsibility of Jurisdiction to update the account numbers that
need to be added or edited in the SUTS System in order to display the local
account number on future tax returns generated from the SUTS System.
L. Use Tax Purchase Details.
Taxpayers filing tax returns through the SUTS System are not required to include
use tax purchase details.Purchase details are typically required on Schedule B to
tax returns required by local jurisdictions.However,nothing in this Agreement
prevents Jurisdiction from requesting these use tax details directly from the
Taxpayer.
M. Business Licenses.
The SUTS System will not require any Taxpayer to obtain separate Jurisdiction
business licenses or any other license.Jurisdiction may,at Jurisdiction’s discretion,
use the information provided by the Taxpayer in the SUTS System to reach out
separately and independently to their Jurisdiction’s Taxpayers for licenses or any
other requirements from the Jurisdiction that is not included in the SUTS System.
N. Frequency of Tax Filings.
Taxpayers may file tax returns via the SUTS System at the frequency which is
required of Taxpayer for State taxes under CDOR regulations;however,
Jurisdiction may reach out to CDOR and request that the Taxpayer may be moved
to a more frequent filing, which will not be unreasonably denied.
O. Jurisdiction New Account Review.
When a Taxpayer submits a new registration with the SUTS System and does not
have a Colorado Account Number,the SUTS System will require that the Taxpayer
submit an online Sales Tax License Application and pay the State of Colorado
5
Page 190 of 268
license fee.The application and fee shall be sent to the CDOR for license issuance
and account number creation for the Colorado Account Number.It is the
responsibility of the Jurisdiction to use the SUTS reports to include any new
businesses in their external system of record and to update their local account
number in the SUTS System using the procedures set forth above.
P. Jurisdiction Rate Validation.
1)Jurisdiction will provide written confirmation to Vendors of its sales and use
tax rates,rules,and boundaries.Jurisdiction will use due care and make best
efforts to provide accurate rates, rules, and boundaries.
2)Jurisdiction agrees to specify to Vendors authorized Jurisdiction users who
are allowed to propose changes within the SUTS System administrative tools.
3)Jurisdiction will use best efforts to email Vendors or use the SUTS System
administrative tools to notify Vendors of any tax rates,rules,boundaries,or other
needed data changes 30 days before they are effective for them to be updated in the
system.All notifications must include details on the changes and the period for
which changes are effective.
Q. Tax Data Integration.
This Agreement does not provide a direct interface or integration to Jurisdiction’s
system of record for sales tax.If a direct interface or custom format is desired by
Jurisdiction to better integrate to Jurisdiction’s system of record,Jurisdiction may
contact Vendor to discuss custom options,which may entail programming fees to be
paid by the Jurisdiction.
R. Licensed Documentation.
All SUTS System user guides,sample data,marketing,training and other items
provided through the SUTS System or by Vendors (“Licensed Documentation”)may
be used and copied by Jurisdiction via a non-exclusive license for the duration of the
Agreement for Jurisdiction’s use solely with the SUTS System according to the
terms of this Agreement.
S. Payment and Merchant Fees.
Taxpayer pays credit,debit or any other merchant processor or bank fee associated
with Taxpayer’s remittance payment,and the Jurisdiction agrees to pay the ACH
Credit or Debit transfer fees from the SUTS System to Jurisdiction’s bank account,
which is currently one dollar ($1)per banking day so about twenty dollars ($20)per
6
Page 191 of 268
month per a Jurisdiction that gets a payment every banking day.The Jurisdiction
will Pre-pay an amount of two hundred and sixty dollars ($260)during the SUTS
onboarding process that will be a credit towards the transfer fees.Jurisdiction will
replenish any funds used,paying in advance of each CDOR fiscal year on or before
July 1 after receiving a notice of account and balance due by June 1.
T. Additional Terms
1)Governing Law.This Agreement is governed by Colorado law without
regard to conflicts of law principles.
2)Survival of Terms.Any terms that by their nature survive termination or
expiration of this Agreement, will survive.
3)Entire Agreement and Changes.This Agreement constitutes the entire
agreement between the Parties,and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous
negotiations,agreements and representations,whether oral or written,
related to this subject matter.No modification or waiver of any term of this
Agreement is effective unless in a written instrument signed by both Parties.
4)No Assignment.Neither Party may assign or transfer this Agreement to a
third party.
5)Enforceability:If any term of this Agreement is determined to be invalid or
unenforceable, the other terms remain in effect.
6)Notices:All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement
shall be in writing,and shall be delivered (a)by hand with receipt required,
(b)by certified or registered mail to such Party’s principal representative at
the address set forth below or (c),as an email with read receipt requested
addressed as given herein.This contact information may be changed by
notice submitted in accordance with this section.
For CDOR:
Name:________
Title: _________
Address: _______
Phone: __________
For Jurisdiction:
Name:________
Title: _________
Address: _______
7
Page 192 of 268
Phone: __________
7)Counterparts,Facsimiles and E-Mail.This Agreement may be signed in
any number of counterparts,which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument.Original signatures of the Parties on copies of this
Agreement transmitted by facsimile or electronically/scanned and e-mailed
copies shall be deemed originals for purposes of this Agreement,and such
copies shall be binding on all Parties.
8)Authority to Execute Agreement.Each person executing this Agreement
on behalf of each Party represents,warrants,assures,and guarantees that
s/he has full legal authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the
Jurisdiction and CDOR,respectively,and to bind Jurisdiction and CDOR,to
all the terms, conditions, provisions, and obligations of this Agreement.
9)Termination of Agreement:CDOR or Jurisdiction may terminate this
Agreement for any reason on 90 days written notice to the other Party.In
the event of a breach of contract,the aggrieved Party shall give written notice
of breach to the other Party.If the notified Party does not cure the breach of
contract,at its sole expense,within 30 days after the delivery of written
notice,the Party may terminate the contract.Notwithstanding any provision
of this Agreement to the contrary,both Parties retain any statutory rights
they may have to immediately terminate this Agreement in whole or in part
in order to protect the public interest of their citizens.
10)Limitation of Liability for CDOR.CDOR,its employees,agents,including
Vendors and assignees shall not be liable for any costs,expenses,claims,
damages,liabilities,court fees and other amounts (including attorneys’fees
and related costs)including but not limited to cost of delay,loss of data or
information,failure of the SUTS system,loss of moneys remitted to SUTS,
direct losses,consequential,special,indirect,incidental,punitive or
exemplary loss incurred by Jurisdiction in relation to any services,including
database access in connection with this Agreement.
11)Governmental Immunity.Liability for claims for injuries to persons or
property arising from the negligence of the State,its departments,boards,
commissions,committees,bureaus,offices,employees and officials,or of the
Jurisdiction,its departments,boards,commissions,committees,bureaus,
offices,employees and officials,shall be controlled and limited by the
provisions of the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act,§24-10-101,et seq.,
C.R.S.;the Federal Tort Claims Act,28 U.S.C.Pt.VI,Ch.171 and 28 U.S.C.
1346(b),and the State’s risk management statutes,§§24-30-1501,et seq.
C.R.S.No term or condition of this Contract shall be construed or interpreted
as a waiver,express or implied,of any of the immunities,rights,benefits,
protections, or other provisions, contained in these statutes.
8
Page 193 of 268
Jurisdiction Approval
By Title
*Signature Date
Municipality or County of Date
Jurisdiction Mailing Address Appointee Phone Number
Appointee Name Title
Appointee Signature Appointee Email
Name of Chief Administrative Officer or
Designee
Title
Chief Administrative Officer or Designee
Signature
Chief Administrative Officer or Designee
Email
Colorado Department of Revenue Approval
By Title
Signature Date
* ⎕ By checking this box and signing above, I hereby represent, warrant, assure,
and guarantee that I have full legal authority to execute this Agreement on behalf
of the Jurisdiction and to bind Jurisdiction to all the terms, conditions, provisions,
and obligations of this Agreement.
9
Page 194 of 268
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Jeromy King, Vance Fender
DEPARTMENT: Information Technology, Police
DATE: July 20, 2020
SUBJECT: PD Rugged Computers Project
DESCRIPTION:
Purchase of rugged computers in Police
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council approve, by Resolution, the purchase of rugged computers for
the Police Department's rugged computer project, under the terms of the State of Colorado
Contract #2016000000000142NASPO with HP, Inc., at a total cost of $276,550.91.
SUMMARY:
The impetus for migrating from fixed computing devices in patrol cars and desktops to issuing
police staff rugged computers is portability and efficiency. Currently, officers share computers in
the patrol cars and wait for shared computers in the police building to write reports, research, or
complete daily business functions. While computing devices in the patrol cars has helped
officers do their jobs much more efficiently for many years it does not allow them portability.
Rugged computers are portable and can be quickly unmounted from the dock and carried with
ease on foot, on a bike, or on a motorcycle. Unlike fixed patrol car computers the rugged
computers can be used without a work surface – they can be used standing or sitting. This
enables officers to enter data while walking around the scene of an incident, working at the
hospital or other assignments that take them away from their patrol cars and computers. Having
a portable computer allows officers to prepare their reports at any location leading to more
efficient use of the officer’s time.
ANALYSIS:
Many of the computers at the Police Department are 4 to 7 years old and are up for
replacement. Some challenges that the Police Department has is shared computers. There are
times that computers are not available for officers to use. For this project there will be a
computer issued to each officer that will give the ability to be mobile. In the rest of the City we
already assign computers to each person so they have the tools and information they need at
any given moment to complete their jobs. Issuing computers to each officer will be no different
and it will give them the tools to perform their job duties.
Some of the benefits that the police officers will have is the ability to improve customer service
and documentation by the ability to have the computer with them to document statements or
gather information face to face without the need to rely on notes and memory. Being mobile
increases efficiency, by allowing officers to complete reports at offsite locations while conducting
other business, and reduces the number of times an officer has to return to the station ensuring
Page 195 of 268
that officers are more visible in the community. It allows for individual officers to set RMS, CAD
and other systems to their preference without having to change it with the shared computers
which increases accountability. It allows them to take them into crime scenes where they can
properly document or access information, using it for victim assistance privately where it is
entered directly into the system as opposed to writing it down. This also helps with CJIS
compliance because the information is directly entered or accessed into their software programs
keeping the risk of private or confidential information being compromised. Since many things
are going digital this also help with situational awareness because the officer or supervisors
could view live camera feeds and collaborate more effectively.
HP, Inc entered into a master agreement with the State of Colorado (2016-0000- 0000-0000-
0142/NASPO). The Master Agreement provides that any state, city, special district, local
government, etc. may purchase products and services at the prices indicated in the Master
Agreement. Purchasing under the cooperative agreement is more efficient because it saves
significant time and money in contract production as well as lower contract prices through the
power of aggregation.
According to CRS 24-110-201 (5) The State of Colorado allows the city to use the cooperative
purchasing agreements the state has negotiated. Cooperative purchasing complies with the
City's Purchasing Policies & Procedures, Section XIII - Competitive Bidding Requirements,
using cooperative purchasing whenever possible through the State bid list as well as other
organizations.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Funding for this project is allocated in the Capital Projects Fund Rugged Computers Project 31
0701 Task 021 which currently has an appropriated balance of $400,000.00.
ALTERNATIVES:
PD will continue to use shared computers
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
Contract Approval Summary.pdf
May-20 Capital Projects Fund.pdf
State of Colorado HP Agreement_Redacted.pdf
HP Quote.pdf
Page 196 of 268
1/2
RESOLUTION NO. _____
SERIES OF 2020
A RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF
FIVE HP ELITEBOOK COMPUTERS, FIVE HP THUNDERBOLT
DOCKS, ONE HP S430 CURVED MONITOR, TWENTY-SEVEN HP
PROMO ELITE DISPLAY MONITORS, TWENTY-SEVEN HP
ELITEDISPLAYS, SIXTY-THREE GETAC V110 WEBCAMS, TWENTY-
THREE GETAC DOCKING STATIONS, SIXTY-THREE GETAC
PROTECTION PLUS 4 YEAR EXTENDED WARRANTIES UNDER
THE TERMS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PRICE AGREEMENT
WITH HP, INC.
WHEREAS, Section 4-1-3-1(C) of the Englewood Municipal Code 2000 allows for the
purchase of commodities, supplies and equipment under any general bid or purchase contract of
the United States Government, State of Colorado or other governmental jurisdiction at the prices,
terms and conditions contained therein, when, in the opinion of the City Manager, the prices
available to the City through such agreement are deemed to be the lowest and best price available
to the City;
WHEREAS, the City of Englewood Police Department is upgrading its computer
systems used in it's operations, including patrol vehicles;
WHEREAS, the City, as a municipality, has the opportunity to take advantage of the
pricing offered under the State of Colorado Price Agreement 2016-0000-0000-0000-
0142/NASPO which is currently allowing local jurisdictions to take advantage of the pricing
structure negotiated by the State through the cooperative bidding process;
WHEREAS, the funds for this purchase come from the Information Technology 2020
Capital Budget Project # 31 0701, Task 021 Rugged Computers, in the amount of $276,550.91;
and
WHEREAS, the cost of each item is set forth in the HP Customer Quote 1255239,
attached hereto as Exhibit B.
.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Englewood City Council hereby authorizes the purchase of Five HP
EliteBook Computers, Five HP Thunderbolt Docks, One HP S430 Curved Monitor, Twenty-
Seven HP Promo Elite Display Monitors, Twenty-Seven HP EliteDisplays, Sixty-Three Getac
V110 Webcams, Twenty-Three Getac Docking Stations, Sixty-Three Getac Protection Plus 4
Year Extended Warranties in lieu of the internal competitive bid process, by using the State of
Colorado Price Agreement 2016-0000-0000-0000-0142/NASPO for a purchase in the total
amount of $276,550.91, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and HP Customer Quote 1255239 attached
hereto as Exhibit B.
Page 197 of 268
2/2
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 20th day of July, 2020.
Linda Olson, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Stephanie Carlile, City Clerk
I, Stephanie Carlile, City Clerk for the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify the
above is a true copy of Resolution No. _____, Series of 2020.
______________________________
Stephanie Carlile, City Clerk
Page 198 of 268
Contract Approval Summary
V10/25/2017
Page | 1
Contact Identification Information (to be completed by the City Clerk)
ID number: Authorizing Resolution/Ordinance:
Recording Information:
City Contact Information
Staff Contact Person: Jeromy King Phone: 303.783.6831
Title: Deputy Director of IT Email: jking@englewoodco.gov
Vendor Contact Information
Vendor Name: HP, Inc Vendor Contact: Paul Galdean
Vendor Address: 3800 Quick Hill Road
Bldg 2, Suite 100
Vendor Phone: 303.956.6744
City: Austin Vendor Email: paul.galdean@hp.com
State: TX Zip Code: 78728
Contract Type
Contract Type :Other (describe below)
State of Colorado Cooperative Purchase Agreement #2016000000000142NASPO for
replacement PD end of life computers with rugged computers.
Description of Contract Work/Services:
Attachments:
☒Contract -- ☐Original ☒Copy
☐Addendum(s)
☐Exhibit(s)
☐Certificate of Insurance
Summary of Terms:
Start Date: September, 2015 End Date: July, 2021 Total Years of Term:
Total Amount of Contract for term (or estimated amount
if based on item pricing):
$ 276,550.91
If Amended: Original Amount
$
Amendment Amount
$
Total as Amended:
$
Renewal options available:
Payment terms (please
describe terms or attach
schedule if based on
deliverables):
Net 30 when computers arrive
Attachments:
State of Colorado Cooperative Purchase Agreement for computer purchases
Page 199 of 268
Contract Approval Summary
V10/25/2017
Page | 2
☐Copy of original Contract if this is an amendment
☐Copies of related Contracts/Conveyances/Documents
Source of funds:
Attachment (For Capital Items Only / Expense Line Item Detail is Located in Open Gov):
☒Prior Month-End Project Status and Fund Balance Report
Process for Choosing Vendor:
☐Bid: ☐ Bid Evaluation Summary attached
☐ Bid Response of proposed awardee
☐RFP: ☐ RFP Evaluation Summary attached
☐ RFP Response of proposed awardee
☐Quotes: Copy of Quotes attached
☐Sole Source: Explain Need below
☒Other: Please describe
According to CRS 24-110-201 (5) The State of Colorado allows the city to use the
cooperative purchasing agreements that the state has negotiated. We will be
using HP, Inc purchasing agreement 2016-0000-0000-0000-0142/NASPO
through the state of Colorado.
Page 200 of 268
A B C A+B+C D E D+E A+B+C-D-E
New Project Fund Bal.Budget
.G/L Start Project Carry Fwd.2020 BUDGET Amend REVISED 2020 2020 TOTAL APPROP.
Project Task Division PROJECT Year End Date 12/31/2019 Approp.Amendments Notes BUDGET EXPEND.ENCUMB.EXP. AND ENC.BALANCE
MUNICIPAL COURT
31 0401 001 0401 Audio/Video System Upgrade 2007 50,000.00 50,000.00 - - 50,000.00
31 0401 002 0401 Furniture 2017 - - - -
SUBTOTAL 50,000.00 - - 50,000.00 - - - 50,000.00
INFO TECH
31 0701 001 0703 Network Development 2001 Ongoing 34,306.99 100,000.00 134,306.99 33,533.69 55,449.11 88,982.80 45,324.19
31 0701 003 0703 Fin & HR Systems - Lic/Upgrades/Hardware 2001 Ongoing 22,747.52 (22,747.52) close to fb - - -
31 0701 005 0703 Court System 2001 Ongoing 335,351.28 335,351.28 - 335,351.28
31 0701 006 0703 Permit Tracking System 2001 Ongoing 261,723.73 261,723.73 - 261,723.73
31 0701 007 0703 Departmental PC Replacement 2001 Ongoing 35,490.03 90,000.00 125,490.03 116,425.41 116,425.41 9,064.62
31 0701 008 0703 Security Cameras 2014 Ongoing 42,301.81 10,000.00 52,301.81 9,135.00 44,066.00 53,201.00 (899.19)
31 0701 009 0703 ERP System 2016 Ongoing 218,152.15 218,152.15 43,185.81 43,185.81 174,966.34
31 0701 012 0703 Audio Video Upgrades 2017 Ongoing 54,308.34 54,308.34 - 54,308.34
31 0701 013 0703 Library/Recreation System Upgrades 2017 Ongoing 86,313.25 86,313.25 - 86,313.25
31 0701 015 0703 Tyler Content Manager Document Management 2017 Ongoing 29,100.00 29,100.00 13,083.05 13,083.05 16,016.95
31 0701 017 0703 Software Maintenance - General 2018 Ongoing 29,810.92 (29,810.92) close to fb - - -
31 0701 018 0703 Print Management Program 2019 Ongoing 74,254.26 74,254.26 22,121.82 44,332.69 66,454.51 7,799.75
31 0701 019 0703 Fiber Network 2019 Ongoing 250,000.00 250,000.00 500,000.00 - 500,000.00
31 0701 020 0703 HRIS System 2020 Ongoing - 200,000.00 200,000.00 34,687.50 115,312.50 150,000.00 50,000.00
31 0701 021 0703 Rugged Computers 2020 Ongoing - 400,000.00 400,000.00 - 400,000.00
SUBTOTAL 1,473,860.28 1,050,000.00 (52,558.44) 2,471,301.84 215,903.42 315,429.16 531,332.58 1,939,969.26
PUBLIC WORKS
31 1005 001 1005 Facilities and Operations 2017 In Process 767,874.70 200,000.00 967,874.70 119,261.38 177,138.41 296,399.79 671,474.91
31 1005 009 1005 Security - Civic Center and Rec Center 2017 48,709.09 48,709.09 10,744.13 10,744.13 37,964.96
31 1005 010 1005 Civic Center Roof 2018 625,143.83 625,143.83 81,083.83 81,083.83 544,060.00
31 1005 012 1005 ERC Flat Roof Replacement 2018 116,966.95 116,966.95 116,851.00 116,851.00 115.95
31 1005 013 1005 Tejon Repairs 2019 45,411.72 45,411.72 55,326.12 55,326.12 (9,914.40)
31 1005 014 1005 Malley Center Repairs 2020 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00
SUBTOTAL 1,604,106.29 220,000.00 - 1,824,106.29 174,587.50 385,817.37 560,404.87 1,263,701.42
RECREATION
31 1301 001 1301 Art in Public Places (1%)1999 Ongoing 70,931.18 14,700.00 85,631.18 - 85,631.18
31 1301 002 1301 Skidloader 2017 2,278.52 2,278.52 - 2,278.52
31 1301 003 1301 Emerald Ash Borer Mitigation 2018 50,000.00 50,000.00 - 50,000.00
SUBTOTAL 123,209.70 14,700.00 - 137,909.70 - - - 137,909.70
TOTALS 3,251,176.27 1,284,700.00 (52,558.44) 4,483,317.83 390,490.92 701,246.53 1,091,737.45 3,391,580.38
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND (MYCP)
PROJECT STATUS AND FUND BALANCE REPORT
May 31, 2020
FYC 20.xlsx 10:55 AM 6/26/2020Page 201 of 268
6/11/2020 hllps /Iwww bldscolorado Com/C0/portal nsf/xpPn:eAgreementRead xsp’7databaseName:CN:GSSBiDS3/O:CO_STATE||Co%5CPriCeAwd nsfiidocument|dJC?F77E7F0920951E7257ED
_201 DD '
Agreement 1:.01 um ASPO State of Colorado Price Agreement
Classi?cation:PERMISSIVE
Status:Current
D_uLa1is2n_Qf_AgLeemenI'.
Period Covered:Options:
Sep 30,2015 To Jul 31,2021 Option to Renew for U More Year(s)
@529 :
Computer Equipment,Peripherals 8.Related Services Depanmem of Personnel and Adminismmon
State Purchasing Office
Commodity Code:2D4DD,2D5DD,2D600,207OO 1525 Sherman Street,3.11 Fioor
commodity Denver,CO 80203
Descfip?on;D°5"‘°P5~'-"‘P‘°P5~5"“T“b'e‘5 Greg Draughon at (303)866-4552
email:gregory.draughon@state.co.us
v Orderinglcontact Information
Small Business:No
Minority Owned:No Woman Owned:Yes
HP Inc (previously known as Hewlett PackardCompany:Company)Doing Business As:
Contact:Lindsey Jackson (Acct Mngr)Contact Email:|rj@hp.com
Order Number:1-300-325-2329 Toll Freelcell Number:§l‘;‘l']°_§é7A§ij;:'jfag:?‘3:::f£:;,|?f‘?§“‘“5‘1'
Fax:1-800-825-2329 Payment Terms:Net 45
Address:Attn:Public Sector Sales,14231 Tandem Blvd F.O.B.:Destination
City,State,ZIP:Austin,TX 78728 Delivery:
Quote Email:psorderprocessing@hp.com
v How To OrderIAgreement Prices
§ g gmm
State agencies are cautioned to obtain necessary OIT approvals prior to use of this price agreement for IT resources.The de?nition of IT
resources and state agencies can be found in §24-37.5-102 CRS.
hltps //www bldscolarada Corn/Ea/portal nslIxpPnEeAgreemenlRead xsp’7dalabaseName:CNIGSSBIDS3/O:CO_STATE||Co%5CPrIceAwd nSf&d0cumenl|d:4C?F77E7F?92D951B7257ED100773E?A&1/3
Exhibit A
Page 202 of 268
6/11/2020 https /Iwww bldscolorado Com/C0/portal nsf/xpPnI:eAgreementRead xsp’7databaseName:CN:GSSBlDS3/O:CO_STATE||Co%5CPnCeAwd nsfiidocument|dJC?F77E7F0920951E7257ED
Ifyou are a State Agency within the Executive Branch,and you wish to purchase an HP Printer,you must contact Teddy Abad with IDS at 303-
866-3881to obtain a Waiver.
HP Inc.is authorized under the NASPO Va|uePoint Computer Master Agreement #MNNVP-133 to provide goods and sewices in the following
categories:
litesktops
Laptops
tablets
Computer Equipment Leasing is now allowed under this price agreement.State Agencies will need to review and complete attachments 1 and 2.Political
Subdivision agencies and eligible non-pro?ts will need to review and complete attachments 1 and 2,along with submitting their own Iederal tax ID
documentation.The Master Lease Agreement with HPFS incorporated within this amendment has been negotiated for State Agencies only.All other
agencies will need to complete a separate Master Lease Agreement with HPFS if applicable.Please see attached amendment for Iurther details.
-ORDERINGANDPRICING:HP Inc.and all HP Inc.authorized business partners are listed on the State's landing page on the following
website:www.hp.comIbuyIcolorado.
Pleasenote:for all purchase orders issued against this contract,the following must be shown on the PO:
-ColoradoState contact #2016-0000-0000-0000-0142lNASPO
NASPO-Minnesota Master Price Agreement #MNNVP-133.
Files:E applicationlpdf 91 KB executed amendment1.pdf
E applicationlpdf 728 KB executed hevvlett packard company addendum.pdf
E applicationlpdf 2,361 KB 14868344093015-2020MNWN_PC_Agreement_HP INC-Amendment-1.pdf
E applicationlpdf 187 KB HP Inc Amendment 3.1 Executed.pdf
E applicationlpdf 1.616 KB HP Inc.Amendment 3 HPFS Leaslng Signed and executed.pdf
E applicationlpdf 408 KB Attachment 1 HPFS Schedule Document.pdf
E applicationlpdf 277 KB Attachment 2 HPFS Acceptance Certi?cate.pdf
E applicationlpdf 36 KB 1574277988_2015-2020 MNWN_PC_Agreement_HP INC-Amendment-3.pdf
Contract Status:-se|ec1-
v Vendor Insurance Certi?cate Expiration Dates
Workers‘Comp:General Liability:Other Insurance:Other Insurance Description:
Sep 30,2017 Sep 30,2017 Sep 30,2017 Autolumbrella
F”°5=[1 appllcatlon/octet-stream 106 KB HP|CO|throughO9302016.docx
tlttps //www bldscolorado Corr!/Ea/portal nSIIxpPnI:eAgreemenIRead xsp’7databaseName:CNIGSSBIDS3/O:CO_STATE||Co%5CPrIceAwd nSf&d0cument|d:4C?F77E7F?92D951B7257ED100773E?A&2/3Page 203 of 268
6/11/2020 https /Iwww bldscnlorado com/co/portal nsf/xpPnceAgreementRead xsp’7databsseName:
E applicationlpdf 46 KB cert_4_1275114_1 (1 ).pur
—GSSBlDS3/O:CO_STATE||Cn%5CPriCeAwd nsfiidocumentlddC?F77E7F0920951E7257ED
onal Attachments
Files:
v Conditions Of Agreement
This Agreement results from the following solicitation:
Number:
Files:
Amendments:
Amendment Number:
Amendment Effective
On:
Reason For
Amendment:
Amendment History:
hltps //www bldscolarada Corr:/Ea/portal nSlIxpPnI:eAgreemen|Read xsp’7databaseName:CNIGSSBIDS3/O:CO_STATE||Cn%5CPrIceAwd nSf&d0cument|d:4C?F77E7F?92D951B7257ED100773E?A&3/3Page 204 of 268
CORE#20l6*0l42CONTRACTAMENDMENTAmendment#1OriginalContractCMS(CLIN)#84031AmendmentCMS#873011)PARTIESThisAmendmenttotheabove-referencedOriginalContract(hereina?ercalledtheContract)isenteredintobyandbetweenHP.Inc,formerlyknownasHewlettPackardCompany,(hereina?ercalled“ConIrac1Dr”),anddieSTATEOFCOLORADO(hereina?ercalledthe“State")actingbyandthroughtheDepanmentofPersonnel&Administration,StatePurchasingOl?ce,(hereinaltercalledthe"SPO").2)EFFECTIVEDATEANDENFORCEABILITYThisAmendmentshallnotbeeffectiveorenforceableuntilitisapprovedandsignedbytheColoradoStateControllerordesigree(hereinaftercalledthe“EffectiveDate”).TheStateshallnotbeliabletopayorreimburseContractorforanyperformancehereunderincluding,butnotlimitedto,costsorexpensesincurred,orbeboundbyanyprovisionhereofpriortotheEffectiveDate.3)FACTUALRECITALSHewlettPackardCompanyandtheStateenteredintotheContracttoprovidegoodsandservicesatnegotiateddiscountedpricesundertheNASPOValuePointPriceAyeementsforComputers,No.MNNVP-133andMNWNC-115.HewlettPackardCompanylegallychangedthenameofthecompanyeffectiveNovemherI,2015.BythisAmendment#1,theContractor‘:namewillbechangedtoHP,Inc.4)CONSIDERATIONThePartiesacknowledgethatthemutualpromisesandcovenantscontainedhereinandothergoodandvaluableconsiderationaresuf?cientandadequatetosupportthisAmendment..5)LIMITSOFEFFECTThisAmendmentisincorporatedbyreferenceintotheContract,andtheContractandallprioramendmentsthereto,ifany,remainin?rllforceandeffectexceptasspeci?callymodi?edherein.6)MODIFICATIONS.TheContract.ParticipatingAddendum,exhibitsandallprioramendmentsthereto,ifany,aremodi?edasfollows:ContractornameshallhechangedtoHPInc.whereverHewlettPackardCompanyappears‘7)STARTDATEThisAmendmentshalltakeeffectonthelaterofitsEffectiveDateorNovemberI,2015.8)ORDEROFPRECEDENCEExceptfortheSpecialProvisions,intheeventofanyconilict,inconsistency,variance,orcontradictionbetweentheprovisionsofthisAmendmentandanyoftheprovisionsoftheContracttheprovisionsofthisAmendmentshallinallrespectssupersede,govem,andcontrol.ThemostrecentversionofdieSpecialProvisionsincorporatedintotheContractoranyamendmentshallalwayscontrolotherprovisionsintheContractoranyamendments.9)AVAILABLEFUNDSFinancialobligationsofthestatepayablea?erthecunerrt?scalyeararecontingentuponfundsforthatpurposebeingappropriated,budgeted,orotherwisemadeavailable.Page1Page 205 of 268
CORE#20I6*0142THEPARTIESHERETOHAVEEXECUTEDTHISAMENDMENT*PersonssigningforContractorherebyswearnnnnrrmnthattheyareauthorizedtoletonConn-a:lnr’shehnlfandacknowledgeamthesumisrelyingontheirrepresentationstothate?ect.CONTRACTORHPInc.(FormerlyknownasHewlettPackardCompany)Bl/1jéDate:1/21/2016STATEOFCOLORADOSTATEOFCOLORADOJohnW.Hickenlooper,GOVERNORJohnW.Hickenlooper,GOVERNORGovernorsOfficeofInformationTechnologyDepartmentofPersonnelandAdministrationSumaNallapati,fTechnologyandStateJuneTaylor,ExecutiveDirectorBy:By:utyChiefInformation0.ndOfficerandChiefFinancialOf?cerContractsDirector¥S_!evenSizemore,OITContractsDirectorDate:Iij:iDate:“hid”ALLCONTRACTSREQUIREAPPROVALBYTHESTATECONTROLLERCRS§24-30-202requirestheStateControllertoapproveallStateContracts.ThisAmendmennotvaliduntilsignedanddatedbelowbytheStateControllerordelegateContractorisnotauthorizedtobeginperformanceuntilsuchtimeifContractorbeginsperformingpriorthereto.theStateofColoradoisnotobligatedtopayContractorforsuchperformanceor(oranygoodsandlorservicesprovidedhereunder.STATECONTROLLERBrclarkBolser,ControllerDelegateClGregGarner,ControllerDelegateElFloyJeffares,ControllerDelegateElJoeWeber,ControllerDelegateElChallonWiner,ControllerDelegatePage2Page 206 of 268
CORE#2016*0l42Page3Page 207 of 268
CMSUS$032COREDOCIDII30150000-0000-DOM-DidiPARTICIPATINGADDENDUMNASPOVaIuePointCOOPERATIVEPURCHASINGPROGRAMComputerEquipmentAdministeredbytheStateofMinnesota(hereinafter“LeadState”)MASTERAGREEMENTMasterAgreementNo:MNNVP-133andMNWNC-115HewlettPackardCompany(hereinafter"Contractor‘)AndStateofColorado(hereinafter“ParticipatingState/Entity"or“State")PA#2016—DO0D-0000-0000-0142INASPO1.Scope:ThisParticipatingAddendum(‘Addendum’)ismadebetweentheStateofColorado.actingbyandthroughthestatePurchasingOffice,ColoradoDepartmentofPersonnel8.Administration(the“ParticipatingState")andHewlettPackardCompany("Contractof")andallowsforpurchaseofthefollowingComputerEqulpmentlserviceszDesktops,Laptops,andTablets.ThisAddendumbetweenContractorandParticipatingState(the“Parties)modi?esandamendstheContract,NASPOVa|uePointMasterAgreementNo.MNWNC-115andMNNVP-133(“MasterAgreement”),betweentheStateofMinnesota("LeadState")andContractorforcomputerEquipment,forusebyStateagenciesandotherentitieslocatedintheParticipatingStateandauthorizedbythatState’sstatutestoutilizeWSCAcontractswiththepriorapprovaloftheState'sChiefProcurementOf?cial.Theoriginalsolicitationcontainstherequirementsandde?nitionsestablishingtheProductBandsallowedontheMasterAgreement.TheMasterAgreementidenti?esthebandsawardedtotheContractVendor,eligibleforpurchaseunderthisAddendumtoinclude:Band1—Desktop;Band2—Laptop;and,Band3-Tablet.Thecon?gurationlimitsandrestrictionsfortheMasterAgreementareprovidedwithrevisionsidenti?edbytheParticipatingStateinthisParticipatingAddendum.2.Participation:i.Useofspeci?cNASPOVALUEPOINTcooperativecontractsbyagencies.politicalsubdivisions,registerednon-pro?torganizations,andotherentities(includingcooperatives)authorizedbyParticipatingState'sstatutestouseStateofColoradocontractsissubjecttothepriorapprovaloftherespectiveStateChiefProcurementOfficial.IssuesofinterpretationandeligibilityforparticipationaresolelywithintheauthorityoftheStateChiefProcurementOf?cial,ii.IndividualCustomer.EachParticipatingState'sagency,politicalsubdivision,andregisterednon-pro?torganizationisanOrderingEntity,asde?nedin§2DEFINITIONSofExhibitAtotheAddendum,andwillbetreatedasifitisanindividualcustomer.Excepttotheextentmodi?edbythisAddendum,eachagency,politicalsubdivisionandregisterednonpro?torganizationwillberesponsibletofollowthetermsandconditionsoftheMasterAgreement;andeachwillhavethesamerightsandresponsibilitiesforitspurchasesastheParticipatingStatehasundertheContract.Eachagency.politicalsubdivisionandregisterednonpro?torganizationwillberesponsibleforitsowncharges,fees,andliabilities.Eachagency.politicalsubdivisionandregisterednonpro?torganizationwillhavethesamerightstoanyindemnityortorecoveranycostsallowedinthecontractforitspurchases.TheContractorwillapplysuchchargestoeachOrderingEntityindividuallyandtheStateshallnotbeliableforanyotherorderingentity'scharges.3.OrderofPrecedence:i.ParticipatingState’sParticipatingAddendum(“PA”);ParticipatingState’sParticipatingAddendumIRev06,0]/I5Page 208 of 268
CMS4434032COREDOClDllzolsoootmixxmooo-DI42shallnotdiminish,change,orimpacttherightsoftheLeadStatewithregardtotheLeadState'scontractualrelationshipwiththeContractorundertheTermsoftheMinnesotaNASPOValuePointMasterAgreementII.MinnesotaNASPOValuePointMasterAgreement(includesnegotiatedTerms&Conditions)iii.TheSolicitationincludingallAddendums;andIv.Contractor'sresponsetotheSolicitation.Thesedocumentsshallbereadtobeconsistentandcomplementary.Anycon?ictamongthesedocumentsshallberesolvedbygivingprioritytothesedocumentsintheorderlistedabove.ContractortermsandconditionsthatapplytotheMasterAgreementareonlythosethatareexpresslyacceptedbytheLeadStateandmustbeinwritingandattachedtotheMasterAgreementasanExhibitorAttachment.Noothertermsandconditionsshallapply,includingtermsandconditionslistedintheContractor’sresponsetotheSolicitation,ortermslistedorreferencedontheContractor'swebsite,intheContractorquotation/salesorderorinsimilardocumentssubsequentlyprovidedbytheContractor.Thesolicitationlanguageprevailsunlessamutuallyagreedexceptionhasbeennegotiated.4.ParticipatingstateModi?cationsorAdditionstoMasterAgreement:ThefollowingchangesshallbemadetotheMasterAgreementwithrespecttoContractor'sperformancepursuanttothisAddendum:I.Thesemodi?cationsoradditionsapplyonlytoactionsandrelationshipsbetweentheexecutingParticipatingStateandtheContractorandareaddressedinExhibitAoftheParticipatingAddendum.incorporatedhereinandattachedhereto.ii.MasterAgreement,ExhibitA,PartC.MinnesotaTermsandConditions.shallbereplacedinitsentiretybyCo|orado’sExhibitA.5.PrimaryContacts:Eachindividualidenti?edbelowistheprincipalrepresentativeofthedesignatingParty.AllnoticesrequiredtobegivenhereundershallbedeliveredtosuchParty'sprincipalrepresentativeornamedsuccessorattheaddresssetforthbelow.Inadditionto,butnotinlieuofahard-copynotioe,noticemayalsobesentbye-mailtotheemailaddresses,ifany,setforth.EitherPartymayfromtimetotimedesignatebywrittennoticesubstituteaddressesorpersonstowhomsuchnoticesshallbesent.NoticestoOrderingEntitiesshallbeasprovidedforintheOrderacceptedbytheContractor.Unlessotherwiseprovidedherein,allnoticesshallbeeffectiveuponreceipt.TheprimarycontactindividualsforthisParticipatingAddendumareasfollows(ortheirnamedsuccessors):QontractorNameDebraLeeAddress442SwanB|vd.,Deer?eld,IL60015Telephone847-537-0344Fax847-572-1336E-mailDeba.lee@hp.comParticioatinEntiyNameTaraLarwickAddress1525ShermanStreet,3"Floor,Denver,CO80203Telephone303-866-4552FaxE—maiItara.|arwick@state.co.usRev06/01/15toPage 209 of 268
CMS534032COREDOCIDitz0l laz6.PartnerUtilization:TheContractormayuseSubcontractorstoperformsomeofitsdutiesandobligationsunderthisAddendum.However,onlythoseapprovedbytheStatemaybedeployed.TheContractorwillberesponsibleforanyagreementswithsuchSubcontractors.TheStateofColoradoisnotagreeingto,andisnotresponsiblefor,anytermsandconditionswithSubcontractors.TheContractorsdutiesandobligationswillbeinaccordancewiththetermsandconditionssetforthintheMasterAgreementregardlessofContractor'suseofSubcontractors.ContractorshallprovidewrittennoticetotheParticipatingStatewithrespecttoanychangestolistingavailablefortheStateofColoradoandshallobtainwrittenapprovalfromtheParticipatingState,whichapprovalshallnotbeunreasonablywithheld,priortoaddingadditionalnamestotheauthorizedlistofresellersandserviceproviders.Contractorhastwo(2)distinctServicingSubcontractorPrograms:(1)theResellerAgentProgram;and(2)theFul?llmentSubcontractorProgram.BothareavailabletoauthorizedPurchasingEntitiestoselectfromunderthisParticipatingAddendum.A.ResellerAgentProgram:UndertheResellerAgentProgramthepurchaseorder(“Order”)ismadeouttoHewlettPackardCompany(HP).HPful?llsandshipstheOrdertothePurchasingEntityandinvoicesthePurchasingEntitydirectly.TheResellerAgentsprovidespre—andpost»salessupport.Pre-andpost-salessupportincludes,butisnotlimitedto,providingadviceonspeci?cations.quotes,assistinescalationoforder(s),andreturns.TheauthorizedResellerAgent(s)underthisContractarelistedontheHPEParticipatingState/Entitylandingpageatwww.hg.comlbuylNA§POVP-Pg.OrdersandpaymentareissuedbythePurchasingEntitydirecttoHPEundertheResellerAgentProgram.TheResellerAgentHPEAuthorizationNumbermustbelistedinallquotesandrelatedOrderactivitiesforsalesandtrackingpurposes.OrdersmustincludetheParticipatingState/EntityContractNumber.HPEOrderinformation,includingtheHPEremittanceaddress,isavailableintheInformationCenterlocatedattheHPEwebsitewww.hg.comlbu1/NASPOVP-PC4.B.FulfillmentSubcontractorProgram:UnderthisFul?llmentSubcontractorProgramthepurchaseorder(‘Order")ismadeouttothenamedFul?llmentSubcontractor.TheFul?llmentSubcontractorreceivestheOrder(s)andinvoicesthePurchasingEntitydirectly,inadditiontohandlingallOrdertrackingandescalationsandofferingpre-andpost-salessupport.TheauthorizedFul?llmentSubcontractor(s)forreceiptofOrdersfromParticipatingEntitiesunderthisContractarelistedontheHPEParticipatingState/Entitylandingpageatwww.hg.comIbuy/NASPOVP-P94.OrdersandpaymentareissuedbythePurchasingEntitydirecttothenamedFul?llmentSubcontractorundertheFul?llmentSubcontractorProgram.OrdersmustincludetheParticipatingState/EntityContractNumber.7.TermsandConditions:TheParticipatingState/EntityisagreeingtothetermsoftheMasterAgreementonlytotheextentthetermsarenotincon?ictwithapplicablelaw.ThisAddendumandtheMasterAgreement,togetherwiththeirrespectiveexhibits,setforththeentireagreementbetweentheParties,supersedingallpreviouscommunications,representationsoragreements,whetheroralorwritten,withrespecttothesubjectmatterhereof.Tennsandconditionsinconsistentwith,contraryto,orinadditionto.thetermsandconditionsofthisAddendumandtheMasterAgreement.togetherwiththeirexhibits.shallnotbeaddedtoorincorporatedintothisAddendumanditsexhibitsbyanysubsequentOrderandanysuchattemptstoaddorincorporatesuchtermsandconditionsarevoid.ThetermsandconditionsofthisAddendumandtheMasterAgreementshallprevailandgoverninthecaseofanysuchinconsistentoradditionalterms.asappliedtotheParticipatingState.3Rev06r0l/I5Page 210 of 268
CMsItH4032COREDOCID#ml DI428.Orders:i.AnyOrderplacedbyaParticipatingStateorOrderingEntityforaGoodand/orServiceavailableundertheMasterAgreement,shallbedeemedtobeasaleunderandgovernedbythepricesandothertennsandconditionsoftheMasterAgreement,unlessthepartiestotheOrderagreeinwritingthatanotherContractoragreementappliestosuchOrder.AdditionalrequirementsforOrdersaresetforthin§4,STATEMENTOFWORK,ofExhibitAtothisAddendum.ii.AllOrdersissuedbyOrderingEntitiesasde?nedinthisAddendumshallstatetheAddendumNumber:201$0000-D000-0000-0142lNASPOandtheMasterAgreementNumber:MNNVP-133.ill.Contractor'spricingsheetsshallbelocatedatthefollowingwebaddress:www.hg.com/buy/NASPOVP-PC4.9.Separation:NeitherPartymay,norwillithavethepowerto,assignornovatethisParticipatingAddendumwithouttheconsentoftheother,providedthatParticipatingState/EntityapprovestheassignmentofthisParticipatingAddendumtoHewlettPackardCompany'ssuccessor-in-interest,HPInc.inconnectionwiththeHPSeparation.AnyreferencetoHewlett-PackardCompanyinthisParticipaingAddendumwillbedeemedtobeareferencetoHPInc.followingHPSeparation.HPSeparationmeansanytransactionorrestructureassociatedwiththeproposedseparationofHewlett-PackardCompanyintotwopubliclytradedcompanies,asannouncedbyHewIett~PackardCompanyonOctober6,2014.ThisParticipatingAddendumisbasedonMasterAgreementNo.MNWNC>115untilNovember1,2015.InaccordancewiththeAssignmentAgreement,asofNovember1,2015,thisParticipatingAddendumisassignedtoMasterAgreementNo.MNNVP-133.10.PartIcIpgtIngAddendgm:Totheextentapplicable,thisAddendumiseffectiveandwillreplaceandsupersedetheexistingParticipatingAddendumbetweenContractorandParticipatingState/EntityundertheWSCAMasterPriceAgreementNumberB27164,asofthe?rstbusinessdayofthemonthfollowingthefullexecutionofthisParticipatingAddendumbelow.THERESTOFTHISPAGEINTENTIONALLYLEFTBLANK4Rev06/01/15Page 211 of 268
CM§at84032COREDOClD'lzlJIt'>0m(><XltKHxm-ol¢2INWITNESSWHEREOF,thepartieshaveexecutedthisAddendumasofthedateofexecutionbybothpartiesbelow.‘Parsonssigns;rofcontraelorherebywearandaftirrnthattheyareauthorizedtoactonContractor‘:hahaltandacknowledgethattheParrieipatingstateisrelyingontheirrepresentationstooutafloat.Contractor:HewlettPackardCompanyParticipatingState:StateofColorado,'DepartmentofPersonnel8.Administration,StatePurchasingOf?ceBy:(Signature)Name:ElCindyLombardi,StatePurchasingandContractDirectorRmollyRandol,StrategicSourcingManagerDate:Li/fParticipatingState:StateofColorado,GovernorsOf?ccofInformationTechnologyElBrendaBerlin,DeputyChieflnformatienOf?cerndChiefFinancialOf?cerbétevenSizemore,OlTContractsDirector\Date:a((IRS§24oo-202requirestheStateControllertoapproveallStateContracts.ThisAddendumisnotvaliduntilsignedanddatedbelowbytheStateControllerordelegate.Contractorisnotauthorizedtobeginperformanceuntilsuchtime.itContractorbeginsperformingpriorttrereto,thestateotColoradoisnotobligatedtopayContractoriorsuchperformanceorforanyGoodsandlorServicesprovidedhereunder.ParticipatingState:StateofColorado,DepartmentofPersonnel&Administration.StateController'sOf?ceBy:(Signature)Controller(orDelegate)ElClarkBolser,ControllerDelegate[3GregGarner,ControllerDelegateElFloyJeffares.ControllerDelegateElJoeWeber,ControllerDelegateDate:RcvD601l5Page 212 of 268
CMS35E4032COREDOCIDit2aI I42EXHIBITAToParticipatingAddendumbetweenSTATEOFCOLORADO,StatePurchasingOfficeandHewlettPackardCompanyTABLEOFCONTENTS1.RECITALS..2.DEFINITIONS3.TERM......4.STATEMENTOFWORK......5.TAXESandPAYMENTSTOCONTRACTOR6.REPORTING-NO11FICATION7.CONTRACTORRECORDS8.CONFIDENTIALINFORMATION-ORDERINGENTITYRECORDS9.CONFLICTSOFINTEREST.10.REPRESENTATIONSANDWARRANTIES.11.INSURANCE12.BREACH..13.REMEDIES14.GOVERNMENTALIMMUNITY15.STATEWIDECONTRACTMANAGEMENTSYSTEM16.GENERALPROVISIONS................17.FEDERALFUNDINGACCOUNTABILITYANDTRANSPARENCYACTOF2004(“FFATA"18.COLORADOSPECIALPROVISIONSEXHIBIT1-SAMPLEOPTIONLE'I'|'EEXHIBIT2—SAMPLESUMMARYCONTRACTORVOLUMEREPOREXHIBIT3—SAMPLECONTRACTORPERFORMANCEEVALUATIONEXHIBIT4—IRSREQUIREMENT1.RECITALSA.Authority,Appropriation,andApproval.AuthoritytoenterintothisAddendumexistsinCRS§24-102-202,andColoradoProcurementCodeR-24-102-202-01.Requiredapprovals,clearanceand.coordinationhavebeenaccomplishedfromandwithappropriateagenciesoftheParticipatingState.B.Consideration.ThePartiesacknowledgethatthemutualpromisesandcovenantscontainedhereinandothergoodandvaluableconsiderationaresuf?cientandadequatetosupportthisAddendum.C.PurposeI.ContractorisauthorizedtoprovideComputerEquipmentunderthisAddendum.ThisAddendumauthorizesthepurchaseofsuchGoodsand/orServices,inaccordancewiththetermsofOrdersissuedpursuanttothisAgreementbyeligibleOrderingEntitieswithintheStateofColorado.TheStatePurchasingOfficehasenteredintothisAddendumpursuanttotheawardissuedContractorasaresultofSolicitation#MNWNC-13310establishtheprice6Rev06/OI/15Page 213 of 268
CMSHN032COREDOClDlf1oI l4zandtermsforpurchaseofGoodsand/orServiceswithintheStateofColoradobyStateAgencies(SA),InstitutionsofHigherEducation(IHE),PoliticalSubdivisions(PS),eligibleNon-Pro?tOrganizations(NPO),andothereligibleentities(includingcooperatives,collectivelyreferredtoasthe"OrderingEntities,"de?nedin§2,Deflnltlons,below).if.ExceptwithrespecttoanyOrdersplacedbyitunderthisAddendum,theStateDepartmentofPersonnel&AdministrationshallnotbeliabletotheContractorasasignatorytothisAddendumforanybreachbyanOrderingEntityofanypaymentorotherobligationhereinorunderanyOrderorContractforGoodsand/orServicesunderthisAddendum,andtheStateshallnotbeliabletoContractorforanypaymentorotherobligationowedbyanyPoliticalSubdivisionorNon»Pro?tOrganizationorothernon-StateOrderingEntity.Participation.UseofthisAddendumbyOrderingEntitiesthatareauthorizedbyColoradostatutestousethisAddendum,aresubjecttothepriorapprovaloftheStatePurchasingOffice.DeterminationofeligibilityforparticipationinthisAddendumissolelywithinthediscretionoftheChiefProcurementOfficial.References.AllreferencesinthisAddendumtosections(whetherspelledoutorusingthe§symbol).subsections,exhibitsorotherattachments,arecontainedhereinorincorporatedasaparthereof,unlessothemisenoted.2.DEFINITIONSCapitalizedtermsusedhereinshallbeconstruedandinterpretedasfollows:A.C.CelllngPricing.“CeilingPricing‘meansthemaximumpriceContractorisallowedtochargeforGoodsand/orServices.ChiefProcurementOfficial.“ChiefProcurementOf?cial"meanstheDirectoroftheStatePurchasingOf?ce,ColoradoDepartmentofPersonnel&Administration.confidentialInfonnation.‘Con?dentialInformation"meansinformation,data,records,anddocumentarymaterialsbelongingtotheParticipatingStateoranOrderingEntityregardlessofphysicalformorcharacteristics,includingbutnotlimitedtoanynon-publicStateorOrderingEntityrecords,sensitiveStateorOrderingEntitydata,protectedStateorOrderingEntitydata,StateorOrderingEntitypersonnelrecords,personallyidentifiableinformation("PH"),andotherinfonnationordataconcerningindividuals,whichhasbeencommunicated,furnishedordisclosedbytheStateorOrderingEntitytoContractor.Notwithstandingtheforegoing,ConfidentialInformationshallnotincludeStateDataandRecordsorOrderingEntityRecords.contract.“Contract”issynonymouswith“Addendum,”“Agreement”and"PriceAgreement,‘andconsistsofattachmentsandanyOrdersissuedinconnectiontherewith,andanyfuturemodifyingAgreements,exhibits,attachmentsorreferencesincorporatedherein,pursuanttoColoradoStatelaw,FiscalRules,andStateControllerPolicies.ContractFunds.“ContractFunds“meansfundsavailableforpaymentbytheStatetoContractorpursuanttothisAddendumforOrdersplacedbyStateOrderingEntities(StateAgencies,InstitutionsofHigherEducationandOtherStateDepartments).Deliverable."Deliverable"meanstheoutcometobeachievedoroutputtobeprovided,inthefonnofatangibleorintangibleobjectthatisproducedasaresultofContractor'sWorkthatisintendedtobedeliveredtotheOrderingEntitybyContractor.ExamplesofDeliverablesinclude,butarenotlimitedto,report(s),document(s).serverupgrade(s),softwarelioense(s),andmaybecomposedofmultiplesmallerDeliverables.EnvironmentallyPreferable."EnvironmentallyPreferable‘meansproductsorServicesthathavealesserorreducedadverseeffectonhumanhealthandtheenvironmentwhencomparedwithcompetingproductsorServicesthatservethesamepurpose(CR5§24-103-207.5,May21,2007).Evaluation.“Evaluation”meanstheprocessofexaminingContractorsWorkandratingitbasedoncriteriaestablishedin§4(StatementofWork)and§15(StatewideContractManagementSystem).ExhibitsandOtherAttachments.Thefollowingdocumentsareattachedheretoandincorporatedbyreferenceherein:Exhibit1(sampleOptionLetter),Exhibit2(SampleSummaryContractor7RevD6/0|/I5Page 214 of 268
CMSII34032COREDOCllllldml lA1VolumeReport),Exhibit3(SampleContractorPerformanceEvaluation),andExhibit-1(IRSRequirement).FiscalYear.“FiscalYear’meanstheParticipatingState'sFiscalYear.whichbeginsonJuly1ofeachcalendaryearandendsonJune30ofthefollowingcalendaryear.Goods.“Goods”meanstangiblematerialacquired,produced,ordeliveredbyContractoreitherseparatelyorinconjunctionwithServicestheContractorrenders.InstitutionofHigherEducation(IHE).“InstitutionofHigherEducation"meansauniversityorcollegelocatedintheStateofColorado,whichissupportedbytheParticipatingState.LlcensedSoftware.“LicensedSoftware‘meanssoftwarethatislicensedbyContractortotheOrderingEntitythroughtheexecutionofaseparatelicenseagreementthatcontainstermsandconditionsthatareacceptabletotheOrderingEntity.Non—ProfItOrganization(NPO).‘Non-ProfitOrganization"meansentitiesthathave501(c)(3)statusundertheUSInternalRevenueCode,arerecognizedas"ingoodstanding"bytheColoradoSecretaryofStateof?ce,andreceivefundingfromfederal,state,orlocalgovernmentalsourceswithwhichtomakepurchases.ANPOmustsubmitanannualapplicationandbeapprovedbytheStatePurchasingOfficetomakepurchasesfromMasterAgreementContractors(asde?nedintheNASPOValuePointMasterAgreement).OpenSource.“OpenSource”meanssoftwareforwhichtheoriginalsourcecodeismadefreelyavailableandmayberedistributedandmodi?edwithoutpermissionfromContractororanyotherindividualorentity.Order.“Order'meansanypurchaseorder,deliveryorder.contract,orotherauthorizedcommitmentvoucherusedbyanOrderingEntitytoOrdertheGoodsorServicespricedintheAddendum.AnOrderamendedconsistentwiththerequirementsofanyOrderingEntityshallalsobegovernedbythesametermsandconditionspresentedinthisAddendum.OrderlnEntlty.‘OrderingEntity"meansaColoradoStateAgencyintheExecutiveBranchofColoradoStategovernment;anOtherStateDepartment;anInstitutionofHigherEducation,aPoliticalSubdivision,aneligibleNon-Pro?tOrganization,andanyotherentity(includingacooperative)authorizedbyColoradostatutesandtheSP0toplaceOrderswithContractor.OrderingEntityRecords.“OrderingEntityRecords”meansinformation.data,records.anddocumentarymaterialsbelongingtoanOrderingEntityregardlessofphysicalformorcharacteristics,includingbutnotlimitedtoanypublicOrderingEntityRecords.non-sensitiveOrderingEntitydata,andotherinformationordataconcerningindividualsthatisnotdeemedcon?dentialbutneverthelessbelongstoanOrderingEntity,whichhasbeencommunicated.furnishedordisclosedbyanOrderingEntitytoContractorwhich(I)issubjecttodisclosurepursuanttotheColoradoOpenRecordsAct,CRS§24-72-200.1,etseqisalreadyknowntoContractorwithoutrestrictionsatthetimeofitsdisclosurebyContractor,(isorsubsequentlybecomespubliclyavailablewithoutbreachofanyobligationowedbyContractortoanOrderingEntity;(Iv)isdisclosedtoContractor,withoutcon?dentialityobligations,byathirdPartywhohastherighttodisclosesuchinformation;or(v)wasindependentlydevelopedwithoutrelianceonanyCon?dentialInformation.otherstateDepartments.“OtherStateDepartments”meanstheDepartmentofLaw,theStateTreasurer,theJudicialDepartment.theSecretaryofState,theStateLegislatureandanyotherStateOrderingEntitiesthatarenotgovernedbytheStateProcurementCode.PartyorParties.“Party”meansmeParticipatingStateorContractor,and“Parties"meansboththeStateandContractor.8Rev06/0]/I5Page 215 of 268
CMS¥N032COREDOCIDII2ole nI42U.PoliticalSubdivision(PS)."Po|itica|Subdivision"meansanynon-Stategovernmentalentitysuchascities,towns,counties,andspecialdistrictssuchasschool,?re,water,transportation,etc.operatingwithintheStateofColorado.V.Revlew.‘Review’meansexaminingContractorsWorktoensurethatitisadequate.accurate.correctandinaccordancewiththecriteriaestablishedin§4(StatementofWork),§15(StatewideContractManagementSystem),andinanyOrder.W.Servlces.“Services”meansthelaborrequiredtobeperformedbyContractorpursuanttothisAddendumandanOrder.X.StateAgencies.“StateAgencies"meansthedepartments,divisions,commissions,boards,bureausandinstitutionsintheexecutn/ebranchofColoradoStategovernment(whichdonotincludetheJudicialDepartment,DepartmentofLaw,theSecretaryofState,theStateTreasurer,theStateLegislature,State—supportedInstitutionsofHigherEducation;ColoradoPoliticalSubdivisionsorNon-Pro?tOrganizations,orothernon-StateOrderingEntities).Y.StateDataandRecords.‘StateDataandRecords“meansinformation,data,records,anddocumentarymaterialsbelongingtotheParticipatingStateregardlessofphysicalformorcharacteristics,includingbutnotlimitedtoanypublicParticipatingStaterecords,non-sensitiveStatedata,andotherinformationordataconcerningindividualsthatisnotdeemedcon?dentialbutneverthelessbelongstotheState,whichhasbeencommunicated,furnishedordisclosedbytheStatetoContractorwhich(i)issubjecttodisclosurepursuanttotheColoradoOpenRecordsAct,CRS§24-72-200.1,etseq.,(II)isalreadyknowntoContractorwithoutrestrictionsatthetimeofitsdisclosurebyContractor;(III)isorsubsequentlybecomespubliclyavailablewithoutbreachofanyobligationowedbyContractortotheState;(IV)isdisclosedtoContractor,withoutcon?dentialityobligations,byathirdPartywhohastherighttodisclosesuchinformation;or(V)wasindependentlydevelopedwithoutrelianceonanyCon?dentialInformation.Z.stateOrderingEntities.“StateOrderingEntities"meansStateAgencies,Institutions’ofHigherEducation,andOtherStateDepartments,AA.StatePurchaslngOf?ceorSPO.“StatePurchasingOflice'or“SPO”meanstheColoradoStatePurchasingOf?ce.aunitoftheColoradoDepartmentofPersonnel&Administration.BB.StatementofWork(sow)."StatementofWork”(SOW)meansaformaldocumentthatcapturesandde?nestheworkactivities,deliverables.andtimelineContractormustexecuteinperformanceofspeci?edworkforOrderingEntity.TheSOWusuallyincludesdetailedrequirementsandpricing.withstandardregulatoryandgovernancetermsandconditionscc.Subcontractor."Subcontractor"means,intheeventsubcontractingbytheContractorisauthorized.athirdParty,ifany,engagedbyContractortoaidinperformanceofitsobligationsunderthisAddendum.DD.UserEquipment.“UserEquipment"meansanyhardware,software,equipment,orotherproductsavailableunderthisAddendum.EE.Work.“Work”meanstheGoodsandassociatedServicesContractorisrequiredtoprovidetoful?llitsobligationsunderthisAddendumandeachOrder.FF.WorkProduct.“WorkProduct”meansthetangibleorintangibleresultsofContractorsWork.includingbutnotlimitedto,software,exceptforpre-existingintellectualproperty,research,reports,studies,data,photographs,negativesorother?nishedorun?nisheddocuments,drawings.models,sunleys,maps,materials,ordocumentsofanytype,includingdra?swhicharepreparedbyContractorunderthisAddendum.3.TERMA.InitialTerm-WorkCommencement.TheParties’respectiveperfonnancesunderthisParticipatingAddendumshallcommenceonthelaterofeithertheEffectiveDateorApril1,2015,ThisParticipatingAddendumshallterminateonMarch31,2017,unlessterminatedsooner,asspeci?edin§13(Remedies).orextendedfurtherasspeci?edin§3.Cbelow.9Rev06!0l/I5Page 216 of 268
CMSJA34031COREDOClDlllure-wotnlooo-000t:~ol4zB.OrderTerms.OrdersshallbeplacedconsistentwiththetermsofthisParticipatingAddendumduringthetenspeci?edabove.OrdersmustbeplacedpursuanttothisParticipatingAddendumpriortotheterminationdatehereof,butmayhaveadeliverydateorperformanceperioduptoone-hundredandtwenty(120)dayspastthethen—currentterminationdateofthisParticipatingAddendum.NotwithstandingtheexpirationorterminationofthisParticipatingAddendum,theContractoragreestoperforminaccordancewiththetermsofanyOrdersoutstandingatthetimeofsuchexpirationortermination.ParticipatingAddendumprovisionsrequiredtoimplementandgovernOrderperformanceshallsurviveParticipatingAddendumterminationuntilalloutstandingOrdershavebeencompletedorterminatedinaccordancewiththisParticipatingAddendum.0.State’sOptiontoExtendl.TheParticipatingStateshallhavetheoptiontounilaterallyrequirecontinuedperformanceoftheContractorforuptothreeconsecutiveperiodsofuptoone(1)yeareachatthesameratesandsametermsspeci?edintheParticipatingAddendumorasamended.IftheParticipatingStateexercisesitsoption(s),itshallprovidewrittennoticetoContractorpriortotheendofthecurrentContractterminatownsubstantiallyequivalenttoExhibit1(SampleOptionLetter).Ifexercised,theprovisionsoftheOptionLettershallbecomepartof,andbeincorporatedinto,thisAddendum.ThetotaldurationofthisAddendum,includingtheexerciseofanyoptionsunderthisclause,shallnotexceedfive(5)years.ll.ContinuationofthisParticipatingAddendumbeyondtheinitialtermisaParticipatingStateoptionandnotarightoftheContractor.TheParticipatingStateshallexercisethisoptiononlywhensuchcontinuationisclearlyinthebestinterestoftheState.lftheNASPOValuePointMasterAgreementisextendedbeyondtheoriginalfive(5)yearterm,theParticipatingState.uponauthorizationfromtheStatePurchasingDirector,maychoosetoextendco-terminouslyinaformsubstantiallyequivalenttoExhibit1(SampleOptionLetter).4.STATEMENTOFWORKA.Completion.ContractorshallcompletetheWorkanditsotherobligationsasdescribedhereinandinaccordancewithanyOrderissuedbyanOrderingEntity.TheParticipatingStateshallnotbeliabletocompensateContractorforanyWorkperformedonanOrderplacedpriortotheEffectiveDateorattertheterminationofthisAddendum.Further.theStateshallnotbeheldliabletocompensateContractorforanyWorkperformedonanOrderplacedbyanon-StateOrderingEntity.B.Employees.AllpersonsemployedbyContractororSubcontractortoperformWorkunderthisAddendumshallbeContractorsorSubcontractorsemployee(s)forallpurposeshereunderandshallnotbeemployeesoftheParticipatingStateforanypurposeasaresultofthisAddendum.C.PricingandPriceChangesi.TheSPOreservestherighttopublishanypricingontheStatePriceAgreementsweblocation,forusebyOrderingEntities.ii.PricingthatislistedintheStatePriceAgreementisCeilingPricing.ContractormayofferlowerpricingtoOrderingEnt?ies;likewise,OrderingEntitiesshallhavetheoptiontonegotiatelowerpricingwithContractor.D.Performance.ContractorshallbecomefamiliarwithindividualOrderingEntityrulesandregulations,asidenti?edbyOrderingEntities,regardingprocurementand?scalrules,deliveryrequirements,andotherrelevantprocedures,andshallcomplywithanyExecutiveOrdersoftheGovernoroftheState,andanyotherjudicialoradministrativedecisionsregardingtheStateofColorado.i.CustomerServiceRepresentatives.ContractorshallprovideeachOrderingEntityutilizingtheAddendumwithcontactinformationforcustomerservicerepresentativesassignedtohandlequestionsandresolveallproblemsthatarisewithanyOrders.Servicerepresentativesshallbeavailable,ataminimum,from8:00am.to5:00pm.,MountainTime,MondaythroughFriday(Stateholidaysexcepted).ContractorshallalsoprovidealistofcustomerservicecontactstotheParticipatingState’sprincipalrepresentativeidenti?edin§5oftheAddendumorsuccessor,andshallprovidenoticewhenanyupdatesaremadetothislist.CustomerIDRev06l0l/15Page 217 of 268
VII.VIII.ix.CMSll84032COREDOClDll2nl l42Servicerepresentativesshallbeavailablebyphone(vialocalortollfreenumber).fax,oremailduringtherequiredtimes.Contractorshallalsoprovideanemergencynumberandcontactforafterhoursuse.AllcustomerservicerepresentativesshallhaveonlineaccesstoaccountinformationandbeabletoprovideatimelyresponsetoinquiriesconcerningthestatusofOrders(shippedorpending),delivery,back-Orders,Addendumpricing,categorydiscounts.productavailability,productinformation,accountandbillingquestions,andAddendumcompliancerequirements.Subcontracting.ContractormaysubcontracttoSubcontractorstheperformanceofServicesandsupplyofGoods,howeverContractorshallremaintheprimaryContractorfullyaccountabletotheParticipatingStateforassuringthatitsSubcontractorscomplywiththetermsofthisAddendum.Reserved.ResolutionofPerforrnanceIssues.OrderingEntitieshavetheauthorityanddiscretiontoresolveperformanceissueswithContractor.Contractorisrequiredto?rstmeetwiththeOrderingEntityanditspurchasingof?cetoresolveissuesonceanOrderingEntityhasgivennoticeofaperformanceissue.Ifresolutioncannotbereached,thenContractorandtheOrderingEntityshallcontacttheSP0inwritingtorequestassistanceinreachingresolutiontothesatisfactionofallPartiesinvolved.Contractor'sfailuretoprovidesatisfactoryperformanceafterreceivingnoticeofaperformanceissuemaybesuf?cientcauseforOrderingEntitiestogivenoticeofbreachtoContractorandtoterminateOrderstheyhaveplaced.Contractorshallconveyanynoticeofbreachitrece'westotheSP0viaemailwithin?ve(5)businessdaysofreceiptthereof.MarketingNotices.Priortoanydistribution,ContractormustsubmittoSP0foradvancewrittenapprovalallContractormarketingnoticesandliteratureintendedfordistributiontoOrderingEntitiesutilizingtheAddendum.Maintenanceofmailinglistsandtheproductionanddistributionofpre-approvedmarketingnoticesandliteratureistheContractor'sresponsibilityandshallbeatContractor'sexpense.HIPAAa)TheHealthInsurancePanabililyandAccountabilityActof1996(HIPAA)PublicLaw104-191governstheexchangeofcertainhealthdataandtheprivacyandsecurityofcertainhealthinformation.AllWorkperformedbyContractorandanySubcontractorsmustbeincompliancewiththeHealthInsurancePortabilityandAccountabilityActof1996.b)TheOrderingEntityisresponsiblefornotifyingtheContractorinwritingwhenplacingaHIPAA-relatedOrder.HIPAAStandardsIFina|RulesarepostedontheDepartmentofHealthandHumanServices(DHHS)website.Tralnlng.ContractorshallprovidetoOrderingEntitiesatnoadditionalcostallnecessarytrainingonallaspectsofordering,onlineordering,productdelivery,productreturns,andcustomerserviceprocesses.Further,ContractorshallprovideOrderingEntities,asapplicable,trainingandinformationontheuseofproducts.includingtheirenergyef?ciency;newfeatures;opportunitiesformanufacturer/certi?edsetupandtraining;green"EPP";andotherServicesthatareofferedoravailable.Procurementcard.Contractorshallhavethecapabilitytoacceptprocurement‘credit’cards,whenavailable.Contractorshallhaveindustrystandardsecurityprotocolincludingstorageofdata,orderingsecurity,anddata?lesecurity.contractManagement.ContractorshallprovideContractmanagementandsalessupporttotheParticipatingStateandtoeachOrderingEntity.Contractorshalldesignatearepresentative(s)whoshallhaveprimaryresponsibilityformanagementofthisAddendum.ContractorshallnotifytheState'sprincipalrepresentativeidenti?edin§5oftheAddendumorsuccessorofanychangeindesignatedrepresentative(s).Orders.OrderingEntitiesshallplaceOrderswithContractorforGoodsandlorServicesonan"as-needed“basis.OrdersshallbeplacedconsistentwiththetermsofthisAddendumduringthetermspeci?edin§3(Term).EachOrderingEntityshallidentifyandutilizeitsownappropriatepurchasingI1Rev06’0|/I5Page 218 of 268
CMSItE4032COREDOCIDitml ol42procedureanddocumentation.ContractorshallnotbeginWorkwithoutavalidOrdernumber.StateAgencies,State-fundedInstitutionsofHigherEducationandOtherStateDepartmentsshallensurethatnoOrdersareplacedbeforeavalidDeliveryOrderorContractisinplaceandshallcomplywiththepurchasingrequirementsdescribedinStateFiscalRule2-2-4(OrdersforServicesinexcessof$100,000shallutilizeaStateContractandencumbranceofContractFunds),unlessexemptorwa'n/edbytheStateContro||er’sOf?ce.TheStateofColoradoshallnotbeliableforpaymentofOrdersplacedbynon-StateOrderingEntitiesandContractorshallnotseekcompensationfromtheStateofColoradoforsuchOrders.ContractorshallfurnishallcommunicationsconcerningadministrationofOrderssolelytothepurchasingof?cerwithintherelevantOrderingEntity’spurchasingof?ce,ortosuchotherindividualidentifiedinwritingintheOrder.AllOrdersandContractorinvoicesforGoodsand/orServicesissuedpursuanttothisAddendum.ataminimum.shallinclude:I.Orderdate,whentheOrderisbeingplacedbytheOrderingEntity,ii.AbriefdescriptionoftheGoodsand/orServicesbeingpurchased,includinglineitemdescriptions,itemnumbers,quantityordered;quantitytobeincludedinshipments,unitcosts.rates(whenapplicable),andtotals,III.Thelocation(deliveryaddress)andrequestedtimeofdeliveryorperformance,iv.Thebillingaddress,v.ThecompletenameoftheOrderingEntity.includingthename,phonenumber,andaddressoftheOrderingEntity'spurchasingof?oerorrepresentative,vi.TheStateofColoradoAddendumNumber:2016-0000-0000-0000-0142INASPO,andvii.TheNASPOVaIuePointMasterAgreementNumber:MNWNC-133.Delivery.Unlessotherwiseagreedinwriting,anyGoodsandlorServicesorderedpursuanttothisAddendumshallbedeliveredfreightonboard(F.0.B.)destinationtothelocationspeci?edintheOrder.TheOrderingEntityshallnotbedeemedtohaveacceptedanyGoodsand/orServicesuntilsuchhasbeeninspectedinaccordancewithOrderspeci?cationsandareacceptedbytheOrderingEntity.TitletoGoodsshallpasstotheOrderingEntityortheleasingcompanyinthecaseofalease,uponacceptanceofdelivereditems.ForcedSubstitutions.Forcedsubstitutionsarenotallowed.IfanorderedGoodisoutofstock.theContractorshallnotifytheOrderingEntityinwriting(emailisacceptable)andrequestpriorapprovalbeforesubstitutingfortheout-of-stockitem.ContractorsrequesttosubstitutemustexplainhowthesubstitutedGoodcompareswiththeout-of-stockitem.IfaGoodisdiscontinued,ContractormustprovideawrittensubstitutionpolicyandnotifytheParticipatingState'sprincipalrepresentativeidenti?edin§5oftheAddendumorsuccessorofthepolicyandchange.AnysubstitutionofferedmustremainwithinthescopeofthisAddendum.TerminationofanOrderbyOrderingEntities.AnOrderingEntitythroughitsdesignatedprocurementof?cerorotherauthorizedrepresentative,mayterminateanOrderfordefault,whichshallnotterminatethisAddendum,withoutadditionalnoticeofterminationfromtheParticipatingState.Suchterminationshallbegovernedbythis§4.H.i.Default3)IfContractorrefusesorfailstoperformanyofitsobligationsundertheprovisionsofanOrder,withsuchdiligenceaswillensureitscompletionwithinthetimespeci?edintheOrder,theOrderingEntity‘sprocurementofficermaynotifyContractorinwritingofthenon-performance.b)Ifsuchbreachisnotcorrectedwithinthirty(30)daysofissuanceofnotice,orif.duetoContractorsactionsorinaction’s,performancewouldbeofnovaluetotheOrderingEntily.theprocurementofficermayterminateContractorsrighttoproceedwiththeOrderorsuchpartoftheOrderastowhichtherehasbeensuchdelayorafailuretoproperlyperform.ContractorshallcontinueperformanceoftheOrdertotheextentitisnotterminated.l2Rev06/01/I5Page 219 of 268
iv.EMSfl8-SD32COREDOCIDII2ol l42Contractor’sDutles.NotwithstandingterminationoftheOrder,andsubjecttoanydirectionsfromtheprocurementof?cer,Contractorshalltaketimely,reasonable,andnecessaryactiontoprotectandpreservepropertyinthepossessionofContractorinwhichtheOrderingEntityhasaninterest(ifany).Compensation.TheOrderingEntitymaywithholdamountsduetoContractorastheprocurementofficerdeemsnecessarytoprotecttheOrderingEntityagainstlossbecauseofoutstandingliensorclaimsofformerlienholdersandtoreimbursetheOrderingEntityfortheextracostsincurredinprocuringsubstituteGoodsand/orServices.ErroneousTerminationforDefaultbyaStateOrderingEntlty.IfafternoticeofterminationofContractor'srighttoproceedundertheprovisionsofthis§4.H.itisdeterminedforanyreasonthatContractorwasnotinbreachundertheprovisionsofthissection.orthatthedelaywasexcusable,therightsandobligationsoftheStateOrderingEntityandtheContractorshallbethesameasifthenoticeoftennina?onhadbeenissuedpursuanttoterminationforthepublicinterest§4.H.v.below.TerminationofanOrderforthePublicinterest.Unlessotherwiseagreed.aStateOrderingEntityprocurementofticer,whentheinterestsoftheParticipatingStatesorequire,mayterminateanyOrder,inwholeorinpart,forthepublicinterestoftheState,providedonlythatsuchterminationwillnotrelievetheStateOrderingEntityfromitsobligationswithrespecttoanyGoodsandlorServicesalreadydeliveredtoorusedbysuchOrderingEntity.Theprocurementof?cershallgiveatleastthirty(30)dayspriorwrittennoticeoftheterminationtoContractor,specifyingthepartoftheOrderterminatedandwhenterminationbecomeseffective.TerminationforthepublicinterestofalloranyportionofanOrdershallnotconstituteabreachofthisAddendumbyanOrderingEntityortheParticipatingState.a)Contractor'sObllgatlons.ContractorshallincurnofurtherobligationsinconnectionwiththeterminatedOrderonorafterthedatesetinthenoticeoftermination.ContractorwillstopWorktotheextentspeci?ed.ContractormuststillcompleteanddelwertotheStateOrderingEntitytheundisputedportionoftheOrdernotterminated(ifany)bythenoticeoftermination.b)Compensation.UponterminationofanOrderbyaStateOrderingEntity,Contractorshallbeentitledtocompensationasfollows:1.Contractorshallsubmitaterminationclaimspecifyingtheamountsduebecauseoftheterminationkzrthepublicinteresttogetherwithcostorpricingdatabearingonsuchclaim.2.TheOrderingEntityshallpayContractoranamountwhichbearsthesameratiotothetotalreimbursementundertheOrderasContractorsobligationsthatweresatisfactorilyperformedbeartothetotalobligationssetforthintheOrder,lesspaymentspreviouslymade.Additionally,ifatemlinatedOrderislessthansixty(60)percentcompleted,mestateOrderingEntitymayreimburseContractorforaportionofactualout~of-pocketexpenses(nototherwisereimbursedundersuchOrder)incurredbyContractorwhicharedirectlyattributabletotheuncompletedportionofContractorsobligationshereunder;providedthatthesumofanyandallreimbursementshallnotexceedthemaximumamountpayabletoContractorundersuchOrder.lntemel:Ordering,E-CommerceandWebCatalog,ElectronlcDataStorage,andCatalogsMaintenanceofitsinternet.e-commerceandwebcatalog.electronicdatastorage,andcatalogsistheContractor'sresponsibilityandshallbeatContractor'sexpense.lntemetOrdering.Asapplicable,ContractorshallprovideinternetcatalogsaccessibletoallOrderingEntities,provideaURLlinkandColorado"splash"pageorlandingpagewithlinktotheSP0StatePriceAgreementweblocation,designatemarketbasketitemsinitson-linecatalogsforeaseofordering,identifyasymbolormarkingusedtoidentifymarketbasketitems,anddesignateallenvironmentalpreferableproducts(EPP)intheiron—linecatalogsandidentifythesymbolusedtomarktheseEPPproducts.ElectronicDataStorage.Contractormusthavethecapabilityofelectronicdatastorageandaback-upsystemintheunlikelyeventthatthemaininformationstorehousebecomesunusable.I3RevO6’Ol/15Page 220 of 268
CMSitX4032COREDOCIDIIzoicooooooocrooooomzContractorshallhaveindustrystandardsecurityprotocolincludingstorageofdata,orderingsecurity,anddata?lesecurity.J.Catalogs.Contractormustprovidepaperand/orcomputermediacatalogstoanyOrderingEntity,uponrequestforthedurationofmisContract.K.OrderforLeasedGoods.AnOrderingEntitymayplaceanOrderforGoodstobeleasedfromathirdPartyleasingcompany.TheOrderingEntitymusthavebeenapprovedfortheleasebytheleasingcompanywhenplacingtheOrder.TheOrderwillprovideforpaymentoftheGoodsbytheleasingcompanyatthetimetheleaseisexecutedbytheOrderingEntityandtheleasingcompanyandtheOrderingEntityacceptstheGoodscoveredbythelease.TheContractorshallconveytitletotheGoods,andanyapplicablewarranties,totheleasingcompanyuponpaymentoftheOrderbytheleasingcompany.5.TAXESandPAYMENTSTOCONTRACTORA.TaxesandTaxExemptionStatusTheParticipatingStateandStateOrderingEntitiesareexemptfromalltederalexcisetaxesundertheUSInternalRevenueCode(IRC)Chapter32(Certi?cateofRegistryNo.84-73o123K)andfromallColoradoStateandlocalgovernmentsalesandusetaxesunderCRS§39-26-101and201etseq.SuchexemptionsapplywhenGoodsarepurchasedorServicesarerenderedtobene?ttheState.Contractorisherebynoti?edthatwhenproductsorServicesarepurchasedforthebenefitofStateOrderingEntities,somePoliticalSubdivisions(e.g.,CityandCountyofDenver)mayrequirepaymentofsalesorusetaxeseventhoughtheproductorserviceisprovidedtotheStateoraStateOrderingEntity.ggnlaggrshallbesolelyliableforpayingsgchtaxesastheStateisprohibitedfrompayingorreimbursingContractorforsuchtaxes.ForthepurposeofestablishingthisAddendum,theSPO’sFEINis84-0644739,howeverdifferentOrderingEntitiesmayhavetheirownFederalEmployerIdenti?cationNumbers.TheParticipatingState'staxexemptionnumberis98-02565-0000,however.differentOrderingEntitiesmayhavetheirowntaxexemptionnumbersaswell.TheContractorshallberesponsibleforrequestingandobtainingeachOrderingEntity’sFEINandtaxexemptionnumber,anddocumentationatthetimeanOrderisplacedoruponContractor‘srequest.TheParticipatingStateisnotliableforanytaxesassessedagainstContractorforfranchiseorlicensing,orrelatedtotheincomeoftheContractor.NotaxesofanykindshallbechargedtotheParticipatingState.B.PaymentstocontractorC.AnOrderingEntityissuingavalidOrdershallbeboundbythetermsandconditionsofthisAddendum,including.withoutlimitation,theobligationtopayContractorforGoodsand/orServicesinaccordancewiththeprovisionsofthis§5,usingthemethodssetformbelow.TheStateofColoradoshallnotbeliableforpaymentofOrdersplacedbyanon-StateOrderingEntitynorshalltheContractorseekcompensationfromtheStateofColoradoforsuchOrders.Invoicing/Billingl.lnvolcesa)ContractorshallhaveanaccountingandbillingsystemandprovideOrderingEntitieswithaninvoicewhenpurchasesaremade.ContractorshallinvoiceOrderingEntitiesforGoodsand/orServicesprovidedtoandacceptedbytheOrderingEntity,atthepricesasprovidedpursuanttotheMasterAgreement,asamended.Astatementshowingtransactionsforaperiodisnotaninvoice,thoughtheContractormayprovidesuchdocumentsasinformationtotheOrderingEntityonaregularbasisorupontherequestofanOrderingEntity.Unlessothenuisespeci?edintheOrder,OrderingEntitieswillpayContractorbasedonsubmissionofinvoicestotheOrderingEntitythatdetailthedates,quantity,anddescriptionofGoodsdeliveredand/orServicesperformed,thebillingrate,theOrdernumber,thePriceAgreementnumberandtheNASPOVaIuePointMasterAgreementnumber.IncorrectpaymentstoContractorduetoomission,error,fraud,ordefalcationI4Rev06.‘0l/15Page 221 of 268
iv.vl.vii.CMSitE4032COREDOCrmZ?I6 D|4ZmayberecoveredfromtheContractorbydeductionfromsubsequentpaymentsdueunderOrdersorotherContractsbetweentheOrderingEntityandtheContractor.b)Thetermsandconditionsonanyinvoice,statement,Contractortimesheet,orotherform(eg.Contractorswebsiteand/oronlineterms),including,butnotlimitedto,indemni?cation,limitationofliability,orcancellationfees,shallbevoidandofnoeffectagainsttheParticipatingStateoranyOrderingEntity.TheContractorsandOrderingEntities’rightsandobligationsshallbegovernedsolelybythetermsandconditionsofthisAddendumandtheMasterAgreement.AnyOrderingEntityemployee'ssignatureonContractorsbillofladingshallbeeffectiveonlytoestablishreceiptofGoodsorServices.TheContractorshallprovideatollfreenumberforOrderingEntityinquiriesonbillingproblems.RenewalofAgreement.IntheeventofrenewalofthisAddendum,oranyamendmentofitsterms(includingprices),unlessotherwisespeci?edinanOrder,theContractorshallprovideGoodsand/orServicesinaccordancewiththetermsoftheAddendumcurrentatthetimeofanOrder,andinvoicetheOrderingEntityatthepricingineffectatmetimetheOrderwasplaced.Remittance.OrderingEntitieswillremitpaymentsbymailorviaStateprocurementcreditcardsorasotherwiseagreedbyContractorandsuchOrderingEntities.TheOrderingEntitiesshallsendpaymentstoContractorattheaddressshownontheinvoice.Contractormustprovidewrittennotice(emailisacceptable)ofaremittancechangetotheSP0within?ve(5)businessdaysofachange.PaymentbyStateOrderingEntities;Interest.ContractorshallallowStateOrderingEntitiesaminimumofthirty(30)daysafterreceiptofaninvoicetopayforproductsorservicesprovidedbyContractor.StatelawandregulationsprovidethatStatepaymentsmadewithinforty-?ve(45)daysarenotconsidereddelinquent,andunlessotherwiseagreed,StateOrderingEntitieswillpayinterestonanyunpaidbalancebeginningonthe45thdayattherateofone(1)percentpermonthonanyunpaidbalanceuntilpaidinfull;provided,however,thatinterestshallnotaccrueonunpaidamountsthatarethesubjectofagoodfaithdisputeregardingtheobligationtopayalloraportionoftheliability.ContractorshallinvoiceStateOrderingEntitiesseparatelyforaccruedinterestondelinquentamountsdue.Thebillingshallreferencethedelinquentpayment,thenumberofday'sinteresttobepaid.andtheapplicableinterestdate.(§24-30-202(24),CRS.,asamended.)PaymentByColoradoPolltlcalSubdlvlslons,Non-ProfitOrganizations,orOthernon-StateEligibleEntltles.ForOrdersplacedbynon-StateOrderingEntities(Poli?calSubdivisions,Non-Pro?tOrganizations,orothernon-Stateeligibleentities),termsforpaymentshallbespeci?edinthewrittenOrders.Contractorshallinvoicenon-StateOrderingEntitiesdirectly.OrderingEntitiesgenerallyremitpaymentinatimelymannerwithinthirty(30)daysofinvoice;however,itistheContractorsresponsibilitytocon?rmallpaymenttermswitheachnon-StateOrderingEntityatthetimeanOrderisplaced.MaximumAmount.StateOrderingEntitiesshallplaceOrderswiththeContractorusingapurchaseorDeliveryOrder,orStateContractasrequiredbyParticipatingStatelaw.regulations.andtheStateFiscalRules.Allnon-StateOrderingEntitiesshallplaceOrderswithaPurchaseOrderorotherContractingdocumentacceptabletotheContractor.ThemaximumamountpayableunderthisAddendumshallbedeterminedbytheamountofOrdersplacedandotherContractingdocuments.NoContractFundswillbeencumberedbytheStateDepartmentofPersonnel&AdministrationagainstthisAddendumunlessanOrderisplacedbythatagency.OrderingEntitiesshallstatethemaximumamountavailableforthepurchaseofGoodsand/orServicesundereachOrder.Advance,InterimandFinalPayments.AnyadvancepaymentallowedunderanyOrderissuedbyaStateAgencyagainstthisAddendumshallcomplywithStateFiscalRulesandbemadeinaccordancewiththeprovisionsofthisAddendumandsuchOrder.Non—StateISRev06J0l/I5Page 222 of 268
CMSit8-ll)32COREDOClbrt2016-0000-0000-0000-DI42OrderingEntitiesmayhavetheirown?scalproceduresregardingadvancepayments,whichmaybeagreeduponinwritingbetweenthenon~StateOrderingEntityandtheContractor.vlil.AvallableFunds-Contingency-Teminationa)StateOrderingEntitiesareprohibitedbylawfrommakingcommitmentsbeyondthetermoftheParticipatingState'scurrentFiscalYear.Therefore,Contractor'scompensationbeyondtheParticipatingState'scurrentFiscalYeariscontingentuponthecontinuingavailabilityofStateappropriationsasprovidedintheColoradoSpecialProvisions,§18hereof.IffederalfundsareusedtofundWorkorderedbyStateOrderingEntitiesunderthisAddendum,inwholeorinpart.theParticipatingState'sperformancehereunderiscontingentuponthecontinuedavailabilityofsuchContractFunds.StateOrderingEntitiesshallonlymakepaymentsforWorkorderedbyaStateOrderingEntityunderthisAddendumfromavailableStateOrderingEntityContractFundsthathavebeenencumberedforthatWork,andtheStateOrderingEntity'sliabilityforsuchpaymentsshallbelimitedtotheamountremainingofsuchencumberedContractFunds.IfParticipatingStateorfederalfundsarenotappropriated,orotherwisebecomeunavailabletofundanyOrderplacedbyaStateOrderingEntityunderthisAddendum,theStateOrderingEntitymayterminatetheOrderimmediately,inwholeorinpart,withoutfurtherliabilityinaccordancewiththeprovisionshereofStateOrderingEntitieswillpayContractorforGoodsorServicesdeliveredandacceptedpriortothedateoftermination.b)APoliticalSubdivisionOrderingEntitymayhaveitsown?scalrequirementsregardingavailablefundsforpaymentofOrders,whichmaybeagreeduponinwritingbetweenthenon»StateOrderingEntityandtheContractor.ix.ErroneousPaymentsa)AttheParticipatingState'ssolediscretionStateOrderingEntitypaymentsmadetotheContractorinerrorforanyreason,including,butnotlimitedto,omission,error,fraud,ordefalcation,overpaymentsorimproperpayments,andunexpendedorexcessfundsreceivedbyContractor,mayberecoveredfromContractorbydeduction(set-off)fromsubsequentpaymentsunderthisAddendumorotherContracts,grantsorAgreementsbetweentheParticipatingStateandContractororbyotherappropriatemethods,orcollectedasadebtduetotheState.SuchfundsshallnotbepaidtoanypersonorentityotherthantheState.b)Non-StateOrderingEntitiesmayhavetheirownfiscalrequirementsregardingerroneouspayments,whichmaybeagreeduponinwritingbetweenthenon-StateOrderingEntityandtheContractor.x.DisoounllbellnquencyPeriod.Anyapplicablecashdiscountperiodordelinquencyperiodshallstartfromthedateofreceiptofanacceptableinvoice,orfromthedateofreceiptofacceptableGoodsorServicesatthespecifieddestinationbyanauthorizedOrderingEntityrepresentative,whicheverislater.6.REPORTING—NOTIFICATIONReportsrequiredunderthis§6shallbeinaccordancewiththeproceduresof,andinsuchformas,prescribedbytheParticipatingState,asapplicable.ContractofsfailuretoprovidethesereportsshallconstitutecauseforcancellationofthisAddendumandmaydisqualifyContractorfromtheawardoffutureawardsbytheParticipatingState.A.Perfomiance,Progress,Personnel,andFunds.Ifandasrequiredunder§15(StatewideContractManagementSystem),StateOrderingEntitiesshallsubmitareporttotheContractoruponexpirationorterminationoftheirOrder(s),whichshallcontainanEvaluationandReviewofContractorsperformanceandthe?nalstatusofContractorsobligationhereunder,inaformsubstantiallyequivalenttoExhibit3(SampleContractorPerformanceEvaluation).B.VolumeReports.TheParticipatingStateintendstousethecentralizedmethodoftrackingvolume.ContractorshallfurnishtheSP0saleslvolumereportsbythelastdayofthemonthfollowingguarterend.Thequarterperiodsare:January1toMarch31,April1toJune30,July1toSeptember30,andOctober1toDecember31.ofanygivenyear.I6Rev06301/15Page 223 of 268
CMSit84032COREQOCIWml 4l42I.ContractormustprovideSPOareportdetailingitstotalsalestoallOrderingEntitieswithintheParticipatingState.eachreportingperiod.TheVolumedetailreport.forthequarterbeingreported,shallcontainthefollowing:OrderDate.OrderingEntityname.theitemspurchased.quantity,unitprice.extendedcost(quantityxunitprice).listpriceperunit,extendedlistoost(quantityxlistpricelunit),andsavings(extendedlistcostminusextendedlistcost).Additionally.ContractormustprovideasummarizedreportinaformsubstantiallyequivalenttoExhibit2(SampleSummaryContractorVolumeReport)attachedheretoandincorporatedherein.andinaformatrequestedbytheSP0suchasanExcelspreadsheet.ReportsshallbesentviaemailtothePrimaryContactidenti?edin§5oftheAddendumorassignedsuccessor.Speci?cally.thereportsmustinclude:a)TotalSalesDollars.TotalspentbyeachOrderingEntityeveryquarter.b)TotalRegular(List)CostofTotalSales.TotaloftheextendedlistcostbyeachOrderingEntity.clTotalEstimatedCostSavings.Totalestimatedcostsavings(totalsalesminusextendedlistcost=savings)byeachOrderingEntity.d)TotalPaidbyProcurementCard.Totalsalesmadebyaprocurement“credit”cardbyeachOrderingEntity.e)TotalGreenSales.TotalGreensales.meaningsaleofEnvironmentallyPreferableProducts.asamended,byeachOrderingEntity.(EnvironmentallyPreferableProducts.includingapplicablediscountsavings,arede?nedintheState'sEnvironmentallyPreferablePurchasingPolicy.Inmostcases,“Green”productshavebeenthirdPartyregisteredorcerti?edassuchbyEPA,NFP.EnergyStar.LEED,etc.)f)AmountofNASPOValuePointAdmlnlstrattonFee.TheamountoftheNASPOValuePointAdministrationFeeduetotheParticipatingState.II.intheeventaquarterlyreportsubmittedbytheContractorcontainsdiscrepancies.whennoti?edbytheParticipatingState.theContractorshallmakenecessarymodifications.whichmayincludeadjustmentstotheOrderingEntity’saccountpro?le.andresubmitreportsinatimelymanner.C.AdditionalReportsi.ContractoralsoshallprovideacomprehensivesaleshistoryattheendofeachanniversaryyearofthisAddendum.orwithinthirty(30)calendardaysofrequestfromtheSP0.Thecomprehensivesalesreportsshallsetforth,ataminimum.thenameofeachOrderingEntity,theOrdersplaced,thequantityofGoodsand/orservicespurchased.adescriptionoftheGoodsand/orServices.theunitpriceorhouriyratecharged.theextendeddollaramountspent.andtheoveralltotalamountspentfortheperiod.ii.IfrequestedandagreedbyContractor.ContractoralsoshallprovidedetailedreportsofthetypedescribedaboverelatingtothatOrderingEntity.andshallprovideanyadditionalreportingasrequested.D.PerformanceOutsidetheStateofColoradoandlortheUnitedStates[IntheeventContractFundsofaStateOrderingEntitysubjecttotheProcurementCodeincludeanyfederalfunds,theStateOrderingEntityshallnotifytheContractorthereofandthisclausewillnotbeapplicable].FollowingtheEffectiveDate.ContractorshallprovidewrittennoticetotheParticipatingState.inaccordancewith§5oftheAddendum,withintwenty(20)daysoftheearliertooccurofContractor'sdecisiontoperform.oritsexecutionofanAgreementwithaSubcontractortoperform,ServicesforStateOrderingEntitiesSubjecttotheProcurementCodeoutsidetheStateofColoradoand/ortheUnitedStates.SuchnoticeshallspecifythetypeofServicestobeperformedoutsidetheStateofColoradoand/ortheUnitedStatesandthereasonwhyitisnecessaryoradvantageoustoperformsuchServicesatsuchlocationorlocations.AllnoticesreceivedbytheParticipatingStatepursuanttothis§6.DshallbepostedontheColoradoDepartmentofPersonnel&Administration’swebsite.KnowingfailurebyContractortoprovidenoticetotheStateunderthis§6.DshallconstituteamaterialbreachofthisContract.17Rev06/01/ISPage 224 of 268
CMSit34032COREDOCID5l0|6-0000-0000-B001)-DillE.LltlgatlonReporting.Vl?thinten(10)daysafterbeingsewedwithanypleadinginalegalaction?ledwithacourtoradministrativeagency,relatedtothisAddendumorwhichmayaffectContractor’sabilitytoperformitsobligationshereunder,ContractorshallnotifytheSP0inwriting(emailispreferable)ofsuchactionanddelivercopiesofsuchpleadingstotheParticipatingState'sprincipalrepresentativeasidenti?edin§5oftheAddendum.IftheParticipatingState'sprincipalrepresentativeisnotthenserving,suchnoticeandcopiesshallbedeliveredtotheExecutiveDirectoroftheStateDepartmentofPersonnel&Administration.F.Noncompllance.Contractor'sfailuretoprovidereportsandnotifytheParticipatingStateinatimelymannerinaccordancewiththis56mayresultinthedelayofpaymentofStatefundsandlorterminationasprovidedunderthisAddendum.G.AdministrationFeesi.TheColoradoGeneralAssemblyhasauthorizedtheStatePurchasingOfticetocollectafeefortheadministrationofstatewideContracts.Onaquarterlybasis,ContractorshallreturntotheParticipatingState,afeeofone(1)peroentofthetotalsaleswithintheStatebyallOrderingEntitiesduringthatquarter,inordertoassistwiththecostofContractadministrationbytheState.TheContractorshallremittheadministrationfeetotheParticipatingStatewithinthirty(30)daysoftheendofeachquarter.Ii.FeesshallbemadepayabletotheStateofColoradoviaachecksubmittedtotheState'sPrimaryContactidenti?edin§5oftheAddendumorsuccessor.Thequarterperiodsandreport/paymentsubmissiondatesofanygivenyearareasfollows:a)QuarterEndDates:(1)January1toMarch31,(2)April1toJune30,(3)July1toSeptember30.and(4)October1toDecember31.b)PaymentandReportDueDates:(1)April30,(2)July30,(3)October30,and(4)January30.7.CONTRACTORRECORDSA.MaintenanceandRecordRetentionPeriod.Exceptforcon?dentialorproprietaryrecords,suchasbutnotlimitedtocostdata,Contractorshallmake,keep,maintain,andallowinspectionandmonitoringbytheParticipatingStateanditsOf?ceofinformationSecurity(OIS)ofacompletefileofallrecords,documents,communications,notesandotherwrittenmaterials,electronicmedia?les,andcommunications,pertaininginanymannertotheOrderorthedeliveryofGoodsandlorServiceshereunder.Contractorshallmaintainsuchrecordsuntilthelasttooccurof:(i)aperiodofthree(3)yearsafterthedatethisAddendumexpiresorissoonerterminated,or(II)?nalpaymentismadehereunder,or(ill)theresolutionofanypendingAddendummatters,or(iv)ifanauditisoccurring.orContractorhasreceivednoticethatanauditispending.untilsuchaudithasbeencompletedandits?ndingshavebeenresolved(collectively,the“RecordRetentionPeriod‘).B.Inspection.ContractorshallpennittheParticipatingState,OIS,thefederalgovernment,andanyotherdulyauthorizedagentofagovernmentalagency,toaudit,inspect,examine,excerpt,copyand/ortranscribeContractor'srecordsrelatedtothisAddendumduringtheRecordRetentionPeriodtoassurecompliancewiththetermshereofortoevaluateperformancehereunder.TheParticipatingStateandOISreservetherighttoinspecttheWorkatallreasonabletimesandplacesduringthetermofthisAddendum,includinganyextensionsorrenewals.IfanOrderfailstoconformtotherequirementsofthisAddendumorasmoreparticularlydescribedinaStatementofWork,theParticipatingState,OIS,andtherelevantOrderingEntitymayrequireContractortopromptlybringsuchOrderintoconformitywithAddendumrequirements,atContractor'ssoleexpense.IftheOrdercannotbebroughtintoconformancebyre-performanceorothercorrectivemeasures,theParticipatingState,OIS,ortherelevantOrderingEntitymayrequireContractortotakeactionnecessarytoensurethatfutureperfonnanoeconformstoAddendumoraStatementofWorkrequirements,andmayexercisetheremediesavailableunderthisAddendum,atlaworinequity,inlieuoforinoonjunctionwithsuchcorrectivemeasures.C.Monitoring.ContractorshallpermittheParticipatingState,OIS,thefederalgovernment,andgovernmentalagencieshavingjurisdiction,intheirsolediscretion,tomonitorallactivitiesconducted18Rev06s’0l/I5Page 225 of 268
CMSfI84032COREDOC[D#ZDI l42byContractorpursuanttothetermsofthisAddendumusinganyreasonableprocedure,including,butnotlimitedto:internalEvaluationprocedures,examinationofprogramdata,specialanalyses,on-sitechecking.formalauditexaminations,oranyotherprocedures.AllmonitoringcontrolledbytheParticipatingStateshallbeperfonnedinamannerthatshallnotundulyinterferewithContractor'sperformancehereunder.D.FinalAuditReport.IfanauditisperformedonContractor’srecordsforanyFiscalYearcoveringaportionofmetermofthisAddendum,Contractorshallsubmitacopyofthe?nalauditreporttotheParticipatingState’sprincipalrepresentativeattheaddressspeci?edherein.Contractorshallensuretheprovisionsofthisparagraphapplytoanysubcontractrelatedtoperfom-lanceunderthisAddendum.Contractorshall,atContractorssoleexpense,reconstructanyrecordsnotpreservedorretainedasrequiredbythisparagraph.8.CONFIDENTIALINFORMATION-ORDERINGENTITYRECORDSContractorshallcomplywith,andshallcauseeachofitsSubcontractors,andanyotherPartyperformingWorkunderthisAddendum,tocomplywiththeprovisionsofthis§8ifitbecomesprivytoCon?dentialInformationinconnectionwithitsperfomiancehereunder.A.Confidentiality.ContractorshallkeepallCon?dentialInformationcon?dentialatalltimesandcomplywithalllawsandregulationsconcerningcon?dentialityofCon?dentialInformation.AnyrequestordemandbyathirdPartyforStateDataandRecords,Con?dentialInformation,orOrderingEntityRecordsandinformationinthepossessionofContractorshallbeimmediatelyforwardedtotheParticipatingState'sorOrderingEntity’sprincipalrepresentative.3.Noti?cation.Contractorshallnotifyitsagent,employees,SubcontractorsandassignswhomaycomeintocontactwithCon?dentialInformationthateachissubjecttothecon?dentialityrequirementssetforthherein,andshallprovideeachwithawrittenexplanationofsuchrequirementsbeforepermittingthemtoaccesssuchCon?dentialInformation.C.Use,Security,andRetention.Con?dential|nfom1ation,StateDataandRecords,and/orOrderingEntityRecordsofanykindshallnotbedistributedorsoldtoanythirdPartyorusedbyContractororitsagentsinanyway,exceptasauthorizedbythisAddendumorapprovedinwritingbytheParticipatingStateortheOrderingEntity,asapplicable.Contractorshallprovideandmaintainasecureenvironmentthatensurescon?dentialityofallCon?dentialInformationwhereverlocated.Con?dentialInformation,StateDataandRecords,and/orOrderingEntityRecordsshallnotberetainedinany?lesorotherwisebyContractororitsagents,exceptaspermittedinthisAddendumorapprovedinwritingbytheOrderingEntityortheParticipatingState.AllCon?dentialInformation,StateDataandRecords,and/orOrderingEntityRecordsofanykind,shallbestored,processed,ortransferredonlyin,orto,facilitieslocatedwithintheUnitedStates.D.Protectioni.IfContractorprovidesphysicalorlogicalstorage,processingortransmissionofCon?dentialInformation,StateDataandRecords,and/orOrderingEntityRecordsContractorshallprovidephysicalandlogicalprotectionforallrelatedhardware,software,applicationsanddatathatmeetorexceedindustrystandardsandrequirementsassetforthinthisAddendumoranOrder.ll.ContractorshallprovidetheStateoranOrderingEntitywithaccess,subjecttocontractorsreasonableaccesssecurityrequirements,7daysaweek,24hoursaday,forthepurposeofinspectingandmonitoringaccessanduseofCon?dentialInformation,StateDataandRecords,OrderingEntityRecords,maintainingStateorOrderingEntitysystems,andevaluatingphysicalandlogicalsecuritycontroleffectiveness.iii.Contractor,ifitretains,stores,orisgivenCon?dentialInformation.orStateDataandRecords,orOrderingEntityRecords,atalltimesshallmaintain,andshallcauseitsSubcontractorstomaintainnetwork,system,andapplicationsecurity,whichincludesnetwork?rewalls,intrusiondetection,andannualsecuritytesting.Iv.Contractor,ifitretains,stores,orisgivenCon?dentialInformation,orStateDataandRecords,orOrderingEntityRecords,shallcomplyandshallcauseitsSubcontractor'stocomplywithStateandfederalregulationsandguidelinesrelatedtosecurity,con?dentialityandauditing.19Rev06/OI/I5Page 226 of 268
CMSttN032COREDOCInd2nis I42Contractor,ifitretains,stores,orisgivenCon?dentialInformation,StateDataandRecords,orOrderingEntityRecordsshallensure,andshallcauseitsSubcontractorstoensure,thatsecurityisnotcompromisedbyunauthorizedaccesstocomputers,programs,software,databases.orotherelectronicenvironmentsandshallpromptlyreportallbreachesandattemptedbreachestoarepresentativeoftheOf?ceofInformationSecurity(OIS).v.NeitherContractornoritsSubcontractorsshallhaveanyrightstouseoraccessanyOf?ceofInformationTechnology(OlT)orotherStateagencydataorinformation,exceptwiththepriorwrittenapprovalofOITortheotherStateagency.vi.Contractorshallreview,onasemi-annualbasis,theColoradoCyberSecurityProgram(CCSP)postedatht_tQ:/[oit.state.co.usIoisanditsrelateddocuments,includingitspoliciesandprocedurestoensurecompliancewiththestandardsandguidelinespublishedtherein.vii.Contractorshallcooperate,andshallcauseitsSubcontractorstocooperate,withtheperformanceofsecurityauditandpenetrationtestsbyOISoritsdesignee.vlll.Contractorshallfollow,andshallcauseitsSubcontractorstofollow,theState’sDataHandlingandDisposalpolicy,whichcanbefoundathttpzllg?.§jate.go.g_s1oi§.ix.Contractorshallperform,andshallcauseitsSuboontractofstoperform,inaformreasonablyacceptabletotheStateorOrderingEntity,currentbackgroundchecksonallofitsrespectiveemployeesandagentsperformingSewicesorhavingaccesstoCon?dentialInformation,StateDataandRecords,and/orOrderingEntityRecordsprovidedundertheAddendum.Abackgroundcheckperformedwithinthirty(30)dayspriortothedatesuchemployeeoragentbeginsperformanceorobtainsaccessshallbedeemedtobecurrent.E.Security—Notice.ContractorisresponsibleforthesecurityofallCon?dentialInformation,StateDataandRecords,and/orOrderingEntityRecordsprovidedtoitbytheStateoranOrderingEntity.IfCon?dentialInformationand/orStateDataandRecordsareprovidedtoContractororanySubcontractorbytheStateoranOrderingEntity,ContractorshallcomplywiththeState'sCyberSecurityPolicies,whichtheOIShaspromulgatedpursuanttoCRS§24-37.5-401through406and8CCR§1501-5,ThePoliciesarepostedatF.SecurityBreachRemediationI.llContractorbecomesawareofadatasecuritybreachinvolvingCon?dentialInformation,StateDataandRecords,and/orOrderingEntityRecordsthatContractorhasreceivedfromtheStateoranOrderingEntity(SecurityBreach),itshallnotifytheOIS,theState,andtheOrderingEntityimmediatelyandcooperatewiththeState,theOIS,andtheOrderingEntityregardingrecovery,remediation,andthenecessitytoinvolvelawenforcement,ifany.UnlessContractorcanestablishthatContractorandanyofitsSubcontractorsarenotthecauseorsourceoftheSecurityBreach,ContractorshallberesponsibleforthecostofnotifyingeachColoradoresidentandresidentsofotherstateswhosepersonalinformationmayhavebeencompromisedincompliancewiththelaw.NoticeshallbemadeassoonaspossiblewithinthelegitimateneedsoflawenforcementandaccordingtotherequirementsofthelawandtheOIS.ii.ContractorshallberesponsibleforperformingananalysistodeterminethecauseoftheSecurityBreach,andforproducingaremediationplantoreducetheriskofincurringasimilartypeofbreachinthefuture.iii.ContractorshallpresentsuchanalysisandremediationplantotheStateandtheOISwithinten(10)daysofnotifyingtheState,theOIS,andtheOrderingEntityoftheSecurityBreach.TheStateand/ortheOISreservetherighttoadjustthisplan,initssolediscretion.IfContractorcannotproducetherequiredanalysisandplanwithintheallottedtime,theStateand/ortheOIS,initssolediscretion,mayelecttoperformsuchanalysis,producearemediationplan,andContractorshallreimbursetheStateand/ortheOISforthereasonablecoststhereof.G.RightsinData,Documents,andComputerSoftwareI.Excepttotheextentspeci?callyprovidedelsewhereinthisAddendum,anysoftware,research,reports,studies.data,photographs,negativesorotherdocuments,drawings,models,materials.orWorkProductofanytype,includingdrafts,preparedbyContractorsolelyintheperformanceofitsobligationsunderthisAddendum,shallbetheexclusivepropertyoftheState20Rev06/01/I5Page 227 of 268
CMSfI34032COREDOCIDit20I ol42orOrderingEntitywithanirrevocable,perpetual,royalty-freelicensebacktotheContractorthatshallbestrictlyusedbyContractorforthebene?tofandatnocosttoothergovernmentalentitiesandallWorkProductshallbedeliveredtotheStateorOrderingEntitybyContractoruponcompletionofanOrderorterminationthereof.TheStatesorOrderingEntity’sexclusiverightsinsuchWorkProductshallinclude,butnotbelimitedto,therighttocopy,publish.display,transfer,andpreparederivativeWorks,andtoamend,updateoraltersuchWorkProductastheStateorOrderingEntitydeemsappropriate.Contractorshallnotuse,orwillinglyallow,causeorpermitsuchWorkProducttobeusedforanypurposeotherthantheperformanceofContractorsobligationshereunderwithoutthepriorwrittenconsentoftheStateorOrderingEntity.TheStateorOrderingEntityshallhavetherighttoexerciseallincidentsofownershipoftheWorkProductwithoutanyfurtherobligationtoContractor,otherthancompensationforServicesrenderedassetforthherein.ii.ContractorretainsallrightandtitletoanyLicensedSoftware,pre-existingContractormaterials,thirdPartymaterials.OpenSourcesoftware.andderivativesthereof,deliveredbyContractorundertheAddendum,whetherincorporatedinaDeliverableornecessarytouseaDeliverable(“ContractorProperty").ContractorPropertywillbelicensedtotheStateorOrderingEntityassetforthinalicenseagreementthatis:(a)acceptabletotheStateorOrderingEntity,or(b)obtainedbytheStateorOrderingEntityfromanapplicablethirdPartyContractor,or(c)inthecaseofOpenSourcesoftware.thelicensetermssetforthintheapplicableOpenSourcelicenseagreement.H.Disclosure-Llabllltyi.DisclosureofCon?dentialInformation,StateDataandRecords,orOrderingEntityRecordsbyContractororanySubcontractorforanyreasonmaybecauseforlegalactionbythirdPartiesagainstContractor,theState,theOrderingEntity,ortheirrespectiveagents.Contractorshallindemnify,save,andholdharmlesstheState,theOrderingEntity,andtheiremployeesandagents,againstanyandallclaims,damages,liabilityandcourtawardsincludingcosts,expenses,andattorneyfeesandrelatedcosts.incurredasaresultofanyactoromissionbyContractor,oritsemployees,agents,Subcontractors,orassigneespursuanttothis§8subjecttotheStateorOrderingEntityprovidingreasonablenoticeoftheclaimandreasonablycooperatingwiththeContractor’sdefenseofsuchclaim.ii.TheStateoranOrderingEntity,initssolediscretion,maysecurelydeliverCon?dentialInformation,StateDataandRecords,and/orOrderingEntityRecordsdirectlytothefacilitywherethedataisusedtoperformtheWork.Con?dentialInformation,StateDataandRecords,and/orOrderingEntityRecordsarenottobemaintainedorforwardedtoorfromanyotherfacilityorlocationexceptfortheauthorizedandapprovedpurposesofbackupanddisasterrecoverypurposes.TheContractorshallensurethatCon?dentialInformation,StateDataandRecords.and/orOrderingEntityRecordsarenotretainedbeyondtime-frarnesestablishedbytheStateandOrderingEntityunlessothemriserequiredbylaw.EndofAgreementDataHandling.UponrequestbytheParticipatingStateorOrderingEntitymadebeforeorwithinsixty(60)daysaftertheeffectivedateofterminationofthisAddendum,ContractorwillmakeavailabletotheStateorOrderingEntityacompleteandsecure(i.e.encryptedandappropriatelyauthenticated),download?leofallsystemdataintheformatprovidedbytheState,includingallCon?dentialInformation.StateDataandRecords,OrderingEntityRecords,schemaandtransformationde?nitions,and/ordelimitedtext?leswithdocumented,detailedschemade?nitionsalongwithattachmentsintheirnativeformat.ThePartiesagreethatuponterminationoftheprovisionofdataprocessingServices,theContractorshall,atthechoiceoftheStateorOrderingEntity,returnalldata,records,Con?dentialInformation,StateDataandRecords,and/orOrderingEntityRecordstransferred,andanycopiesthereoftotheStateorOrderingEntity,andcertifytotheStateorOrderingEntitythatithasdoneso,unlesslegislationapplicabletotheContractorpreventsitfromreturningordestroyingallorpartofthedata.Con?dentialInformation,StateDataandRecords,andlorOrderingEntityRecordstransferred.Inthatcase,theContractorwarrantsthatitwillguaranteethereafterthecon?dentialityofthedata,Con?dentialInformation.StateDataandRecords,andlorOrderingEntityRecordstransferredandwillnotactivelyprocessthedatatransferredanymore.2|Rev06/01/15Page 228 of 268
CMS?aws:COREDOCIDIIM|6 I42DispositionofData.TheParticipatingStateandOrderingEntitiesretaintherighttousetheestablishedoperationalServicestoaccessandretrieveCon?dentialInformation,StateDataandRecords,andlorOrderingEntityRecordsstoredonContractor'sinfrastructure,attheirsolediscretion.TheContractoranditsSubcontractorswarrantthatuponrequestoftheState,anOrderingEntity,and/ortheOIS,theContractorwillmakeavailableitsdataprocessingfacilitiesforanauditofthemeasuresreferredtoin§7.D.TheParticipatingStateandOrderingEntitiesreserveallright,titleandinterest,includingallintellectualpropertyandproprietaryrights.inandto,systemdata,Con?dentiallnfom-ration,StateDataandRecords.OrderingEntityRecords,andandcontentprovidedbytheStateandOrderingEntity.SafeguardingPersonalIdentifiableinformation(PII).IfContractororanyofitsSubcontractorswillormayreceivepersonallyidenti?ableinformation(PM)(asde?nedinCRS§18-5-901113))undertheAddendum,ContractorshallprovideforthesecurityofsuchPIIinamanneracceptabletotheState,OrderingEntity,ortheOISinthecaseofaStateAgencysubjecttocompliancewithCRS§24—37.5-101etseq..including,withoutlimitation,non-disclosure,useofappropriatetechnology.securitypractices.computeraccesssecurity.dataaccesssecurity,datastorageencryption,datatransmissionencryption,securityinspectionsandaudits.ContractorshalltakefullresponsibilityforthesecurityofalldatainitspossessionorinthepossessionofitsSubcontractors,andshallholdtheParticipatingStateandOrderingEntitiesharmlessforanydamagesorliabilitiesresultingfromtheunauthorizeddisclosureorlossthereof.safeguardingFederalTaxInformation(FTI).IfContractororanyofitsSubcontractorswillormayreceivefederaltaxinformation(FTI)undertheAddendum,ContractorshallprovideforthesecurityoftheFTI,inamanneracceptabletotheOrderingEntity.orOISinthecaseofaStateAgencysubjecttocompliancewithCRS§24-37.5-101etseq.,andinaccordancewithStateandfederallaw.ForthepurposesoftheAddendum,“FTI"shallmeanfederalorstatetaxreturns,returninformation,andsuchothertax-relatedinformationasmaybeprotectedbyStateandfederallaw.Securitysafeguardsshallinclude,withoutlimitation,supervisionbyresponsibleemployees.approvalofSubcontractorsasrequiredbyStateorfederallaw,non—disclosureofinformationotherthanasnecessaryintheperformanceofContractorsoritsSubcontractorsobligationsundertheAddendum,non-disclosureprotections,properaccountingandstorageofinformation,civilandcriminalpenaltiesfornon-complianceasprovidedbylaw,certi?cationsandinspections.ContractorshallcomplywiththerequirementsofExhIb|t4(IRSRequirement),attachedheretoandincorporatedherein.SafeguardingPaymentCardIndustry(PCI)Data.IfContractororanyofitsSubcontractorswillormayreceivepaymentcardindustry(POI)dataundertheAddendum,ContractorshallprovideforthesecurityofthePCIdata,inaccordancewithPCIDataSecurityStandard(DSS)1.1orthethencurrentversionasprovidedbyPCISecurityStandardsCouncil.ForthepurposesoftheContract,"PCIdata"shallmeananydatarelatedtocardholders’names,creditcardnumbers,orothercreditcardinformationasmaybeprotectedbyStateandfederallaw.Securitysafeguardsshallinclude,withoutlimitation,supervisionbyresponsibleemployees,approvalofSubcontractorsasrequiredbyStateorfederallaw,non—disclosureofinformationotherthanasnecessaryintheperformanceofContractofsoritsSubcontractor’sobligationsundertheAddendum,non—discIosureprotections,properaccountingandstorageofinformation,civilandcriminalpenaltiesfornon~comp|ianceasprovidedbylaw,certi?cationsandinspections..IntellectualPropertyIndemnification.Contractorshallindemnify,holdharmlessanddefend,atContractor'ssoleexpense.theParticipatingStateandOrderingEntitiesandtheirrespectiveemployeesandagentsagainstanyandallloss,cost,expensesorliability,includingbutnotlimitedtoattorneysfees,courtcostsandotherlegalexpensesanddamagesarisingoutofaclaimthatanyGoodsorServices,softwareorWorkProductprovidedbyContractorunderthisContract.ortheusethereof,infringesapatent,copyright,trademark,tradesecret,oranyotherintellectualpropertyright.ContractofsobligationhereundershallnotextendtothecombinationoftheGoods,Services,softwareorWorkProductwithanyotherproduct,systemormethod,unlesstheotherproduct,systemormethodis(i)providedbyContractororContractor'ssubsidiariesoraf?liates,or(ii)speci?edbyContractortoWorkwiththeGoods,or22Rev06/0|/I5Page 229 of 268
CMSit34032COREDOCID“20l6—00t)0—DD00-Dow-£)l-12(iii)reasonablyrequiredinordertousetheGoodsinitsintendedmannerandtheinfringementcouldnothavebeenavoidedbysubstitutinganotherreasonablyavailableproduct,systemormethodcapableofperformingthesamefunction,or(Iv)isreasonablyexpectedtobeusedincombinationwiththeGoods,TransitionofServices.UponexpirationorearlierterminationofthisAddendumoranyServicesprovidedhereunder,ContractorshallaccomplishacompletetransferoftheServicesfromContractortotheParticipatingStateorOrderingEntityoranyreplacemententitydesignatedsolelybytheStateorOrderingEntitywithoutanyinterruptionoforadverseimpactontheServicesoranyotherServicesprovidedbythirdPartieshereunder.ContractorshallcooperatefullywiththeStateorOrderingEntityorsuchreplacemententity,andpromptlytakeallstepsrequiredtoassistineffectingacompletetransferoftheServicesasdesignatedbytheStateorOrderingEntity.AllWorkrelatedtosuchtransferofServicesshallbeperformedatnoadditionalcostbeyondwhatwouldbepaidfortheServiceshereunder.9.CONFLICTSOFINTERESTA.Contractorshallnotengageinanybusinessorpersonalactivitiesorpracticesormaintainanyrelationshipswhichcon?ictinanywaywiththefullperformanceofContractofsobligationshereunder.ContractoracknowledgesthatwithrespecttothisAddendum,eventheappearanceofaconflictofinterestisharmfultotheParticipatingState'sinterests.AbsenttheParticipatingState’spriorwrittenapproval,Contractorshallrefrainfromanypractices,activitiesorrelationshipsthatreasonablyappeartobeincon?ictwiththefullperformanceofContractorsobligationstotheStatehereunder.Ifaconflictorappearancethereofexists,orifContractorisuncertainwhetheracon?ictortheappearanceofaconflictofinterestexists,ContractorshallsubmittotheStateadisclosurestatementsettingforththerelevantdetailsfortheState'sconsideration.FailuretopromptlysubmitadisclosurestatementortofollowtheState'sdirectioninregardtotheapparentcon?ictconstitutesabreachofthisAddendum.10.REPRESENTATIONSANDWARRANTIESContractormakesthefollowingspeci?crepresentationsandwarrantiesforthebenefitoftheStateandOrderingEntitiesonthedatehereofandasofeachOrder'seffectivedate,eachofwhichwasreliedonbytheStateinenteringintothisAddendum,andwillberelieduponbytheStateinenteringintothisAddendumandbyeachOrderingEntityinplacingOrderswithContractors.A.C.StandardandMannerofPerformance.Contractorshallperformitsobligationshereunderinaccordancewiththecommerciallyreasonablestandardsofcare,skillanddiligenceinContractorsindustry,trade,orprofessionandinthesequenceandmannersetforthinthisAddendumandinanyOrder.LegalAuthority-contractorSignatory.ContractorwarrantsthatitpossessesthelegalauthoritytoenterintothisAddendumandthatithastakenallactionsrequiredbyitsprocedures,andby-laws,and/orapplicablelawstoexercisethatauthority,andtolawfullyauthorizeitsundersignedsignatorytoexecutethisAddendum,oranypartthereof,andtobindContractortoitsterms.IfrequestedbytheParticipatingState,ContractorshallprovidetheStatewithproofofContractorsauthoritytoenterintothisAddendumwithin?fteen(15)daysofreceivingsuchrequest.Licenses,Permits,Etc.i.ContractorrepresentsandwarrantsthatasoftheEffectiveDateithas.andthatatalltimesduringthetermhereofitshallhaveandmaintain,atitssoleexpense,alllicenses,certi?cations,approvals,insurance,permits,andotherauthorizationsrequiredbylawtoperformitsobligationshereunder.Contractorwarrantsthatitshallmaintainallnecessarylicenses,certi?cations,approvals,insurance,permits,andotherauthorizationsrequiredtoproperlyperformthisAddendum,withoutreimbursementbytheParticipatingStateorotheradjustmentinContractFunds.Additionally,allemployeesandagentsofContractordeliveringOrdersunderthisAddendumshallholdallrequiredlicensesorcerti?cations,ifany,toperformtheirresponsibilities.23Rev0630]/I5Page 230 of 268
CMSilB4032COREDOCloll2oIs I42Contractor,ifaforeigncorporationorotherforeignentitytransactingbusinessintheStateofColorado,furtherwarrantsthatitcurrentlyhasobtainedandshallmaintainanyapplicablecerti?cateofauthoritytotransactbusinessintheStateofColoradoandhasdesignatedaregisteredagentinColoradotoacceptserviceofprocess.Anyrevocation,withdrawalornon-renewalofsuchlicenses,certi?cations,approvals,insurance,permitsoranysuchsimilarrequirementsnecessaryforContractortoproperlyperformthetermsofthisAddendumisamaterialbreachbyContractorandmayconstitutegroundsforterminationofthisAddendum.D.DolngBuslnessinColorado.ContractoranditsSubcontractorsandauthorizeddealerldistributors,ifapplicable,shallregistertodobusinesswithintheStateofColoradowiththeColoradoSecretaryofState,inaccordancewithCRS§7-90-801.andmustmaintainsuchregistrationin"goodstanding"throughoutthetermofthisAddendum.ContractorshallprovidetheParticipatingStateupontheState'srequestacopyofContractor'sArticlesofIncorporationand/orBylaws.E.FederalEmployerIdentificationNumber(FEIN).ContractorshallsubmittotheParticipatingStateitsFEINandacompletedW-9,TaxpayerIdenti?cationformbeforeanyOrderingEntitymayissueanOrdertoContractorunderthisAddendum.11.INSURANCEContractoranditsSubcontractorsshallmaintaininsuranceasspeci?edinthis§11atalltimesduringthetermofthisAddendum.AllpoliciesevidencingtheinsurancecoveragerequiredhereundershallbeissuedbyinsurancecompaniessatisfactorytoContractorandtheState.A.ContractorPublicEntitiesa)IfContractorisa"publicentity"withinthemeaningoftheColoradoGovernmentalImmunityAct,CR5§24-10-101,etseq.,asamended(the“G|A“).thenContractorshallmaintainatalltimesduringthetermofthisAddendumsuchliabilityinsurance,bycommercialpolicyorself-insurance,asisnecessarytomeetitsliabilitiesundermeGIA.b)ContractorshallshowproofofsuchinsurancesatisfactorytotheState,ifrequestedbytheState.ContractorshallrequireeachContractwithaSubcontractorthatisapublicentity,toincludetheinsurancerequirementsnecessarytomeetsuchSubcontractorsliabilitiesundertheGIA.Non-PublicEntities.IfContractorisnota''publicentity“withinthemeaningoftheGIA.ContractorshallobtainandmaintainduringthetermofthisAddenduminsurancecoverageandpoliciesmeetingtherequirementssetforthin§11(B),andshallobtainandmaintainduringthetermsofthisAddendum.insurancecoverageandpoliciesmeetingthesamerequirementswithrespecttoSubcontractorsthatarenot"publicentities".B.Contractors-Subcontractors.ContractorshallrequireeachContractwithSubcontractorsprovidingGoodsorServicesinconnectionwiththisAddendum,otherthanthosethatarepublicentities,toincludeinsurancerequirementssubstantiallysimilartothefollowing:Worker'sCompensation.Worker'sCompensationInsuranceasrequiredbyStatestatute,andEmployefsLiabilityInsurancecoveringallofContractor’:employeesactingwithinthecourseandscopeoftheiremployment.CommercialGeneralLiability.CommercialGeneralLiabilityInsurancewrittenonISOoccurrencefonnCG000110/93orequivalent,coveringpremisesoperations,?redamage,independentContractors,productsandcompletedoperationsContractualliability,personalinjury,andadvertisingliabilitywithlimitsasfollows:(a)$1,000,000eachoccurrence;(b)$1,000,000generalaggregate;(c)$1.000,000productsandcompletedoperationsaggregate;and(d)$50,000anyone?re.Ifanyaggregatelimitisreducedbelow$1,000,000becauseofclaimsmadeorpaid,Contractorand/orSubcontractorshallimmediatelyobtainadditionalinsurancetorestorethefullaggregatelimitandfurnishtoContractoriscerti?cateorotherdocumentsatisfactorytoContractorshowingcompliancewiththisprovision.AutomobileLlablllty.AutomobileLiabilityInsurancecoveringanyauto(includingowned,hiredandnon-ownedautos)withalimitof$1,0D0,000eachaccidentcombinedsinglelimit.24Rev06301/ISPage 231 of 268
CMsrlB4032COREDOCIDI420Is r4:iv.HPwillprovideerrorsandomissionsinsurance,includingcyberprivacycoverage,at$1,000,000and$1,000,000annualaggregate.v.ProfessionalLiability.IfContractororSubcontractorisprovidingIT,legal,engineering,accounting,medical,architecturalorotherprofessionalServices,ContractorshallrequiresuchContractswithSubcontractorstoacquireaProfessionalLiability(includingCyberPrivacy)InsurancePolicyintheminimumamountof$1,000,000peroccurrenceand$1,000,000intheaggregate,writtenonanoccurrenceformthatprovidescoverageforitsWorkundertakenpursuanttothisAddendum.Ifapolicywrittenonanoccurrenceformisnotcommerciallyavailable,aclaims-madepolicyshallremainineffectforthetermoftheContractandforatleastone(1)yearbeyondthecompletionandacceptanceoftheWorkunderthisContract.vi.AdditionalInsured.ThePar?cipatingStateshallbeincludedasadditionalinsuredonallCommercialGeneralLiabilityandAutomobileLiabilityInsurancepolicies(leasesandconstructionContractsrequireadditionalinsuredcoverageforcompletedoperationsonendorsementsCG201011/85,CG2037,orequivalent)requiredofContractorandanySubcontractorshereunder.vll.PrimacyofCoverage.CoveragerequiredofContractorandSubcontractorshallbeprimaryoveranyinsuranceorself-insuranceprogramcarriedbyContractorortheState.viii.subrogationWaiver.TheWorkersCompensationmaintainedbyContractorshallincludeclausesstatingthateachcarriershallwaiveallrightsofrecovery,undersubrogationorotherwise,againstContractorortheState,itsagencies,institutions,organizations,of?cers,agents,employees,andvolunteers.C.Certificates.Contractorshallprovidecerti?catesshowinginsurancecoveragerequiredhereundertotheParticipatingStatewithinseven(7)businessdaysoftheEffectiveDateofthisAddendum.Nolaterthanfifteen(15)dayspriortotheexpirationdateofanysuchcoverage,ContractorshalldelivertotheParticipatingState,certi?catesofinsuranceevidencingrenewalsthereof.Inaddition,uponrequestbytheStateatanyothertimeduringthetermofthisAddendum.ContractorandeachSubcontractorshallsupplytheStatewithevidence,satisfactorytothecompliancewiththeprovisionsofthis§11.12.BREACHA.Defined.Inadditiontoanybreachesspeci?edinothersectionsofthisAddendumandtheMasterAgreement,thefailureoftheContractor,theStateoranOrderingEntitytoperformanyoftheirmaterialobligationshereunder,inwholeorinpartorinatimelyorsatisfactorymanner,constitutesabreach.Theinstitutionofproceedingsunderanybankruptcy.insolvency,reorganizationorsimilarlaw.byoragainstContractor,ortheappointmentofareceiverorsimilarof?cerforContractororanyofitsproperty.whichisnotvacatedorfullystayedwithintwenty(20)daysaftertheinstitutionoroccurrencethereof,shallalsoconstituteabreach.NoticeandCurePeriod.intheeventofabreach,noticeofsuchshallbegiveninwritingbytheaggrievedPartytotheotherPartyandtotheParticipatingStateinthemannerprovidedin§5oftheAddendum.Ifsuchbreachisnotcuredwithinthirty(30)daysofreceiptofwrittennotice,orifacurecannotbecompletedwithinthirty(30)days,orifcureofthebreachhasnotbegunwithinthirty(30)daysandpursuedwithduediligence,theStateoranOrderingEntitymayexerciseanyoftheremediessetforthin§13(Remedies).Notwithstandinganythingtothecontraryherein,theState,initssolediscretion,neednotprovideadvancenoticeoracureperiodandmayimmediatelyterminatethisAddenduminwholeorinpartifreasonablynecessarytopreservepublicsafetyortopreventimmediatepubliccrisis.13.REMEDIESIfContractorisinbreachunderanyprovisionofthisAddendum,theStateandanOrderingEntityshallhavealloftheapplicableremedieslistedinthis§13,exceptforthoseremediesspeci?callylimitedtotheState,inadditiontoallotherremediessetforthinothersectionsofthisAddendum,theMasterAgreement,andunderapplicablelaw,followingthenoticeandcureperiodsetforthin§12(Breach).TheParticipatingStateandanyOrderingEntitymayexerciseanyoralloftheremediesavailabletoit,initssolediscretion,concurrentlyorconsecutively.25Rev06.90]/I5Page 232 of 268
A.CMS?aws:COREDOCIDIIl0|6-lIl00-t])0l1-(XXX)-DI-12ContractTermlnatlonforCauseand/orBreach.TheParticipatingStatemayterminatethisentireAddendumoranypartthereof,oranyOrder,inresponsetoContractorsuncuredbreach.ExercisebytheStateofthisrightshallnotbeabreachofitsobligationshereunder.ContractorshallremainresponsibleforperformanceofthisAddendumandanyOrderstotheextentnotterminated,ifany.i.ObligationsandRightsa)Totheextentspeci?edinanyterminationnotice,Contractorshallnotincurfurtherobligationsorrenderfurtherperformancehereunderpasttheeffectivedateofsuchnotice,andshallterminateoutstandingOrdersandsubcontractswiththirdPartiespertainingtosuchperformance.However.ContractorshallcompleteanddelivertoindividualOrderingEntitiesallundisputedOrdersnotcancelledbytheterminationnoticeandmayincurobligationsasarenecessarytodosowithinthisAddendum’sterms.AttherequestanyOrderingEntity,ContractorshallassigntotherequestingOrderingEntityallofContractor'sright,title,andinterestinWorkProductcreatedpursuanttoanyterminatedOrdersasoftheeffectivedateoftheirtermination.Upontermination,ContractorandanySubcontractorshalltaketimely,reasonableandnecessaryactiontoprotectandpreservepropertyinthepossessionofContractorinwhichanyindividualOrderingEntitieshaveaninterest.ContractorandanySubcontractorsshallimmediatelyreturntotheOrderingEntityallmaterialsownedbytheOrderingEntitythatareintheirpossession.AllWorkProduct,attheoptionoftheOrderingEntity.shallbedeliveredbyContractortotheOrderingEntityandshallbecomethepropertyoftheOrderingEntity.Payments.OrderingEntitiesshallreimburseContractoronlyforacceptedperformanceuptothedateofterminationofanOrder.If,afterterminationofanOrderbyStateOrderingEntities,itisdeterminedthatContractorwasnotinbreachorthatContractor'sactionorinactionwasexcusable,suchterminationshallbetreatedasaterminationinthepublicinterestandtherightsandobligationsofthePartiesshallbethesameasifthisAddendumhadbeenterminatedinthepublicinterest,asdescribedbelowin§13.B.DamagesandWithholding.NotwithstandinganyotherremedialactionbytheParticipatingStateoranOrderingEntity,ContractorshallremainliabletotheStateortheOrderingEntityasmaybeappropriateforanydamagessustainedbytheStateortheOrderingEntitybyvirtueofanybreachunderthisAddendumbyContractor.AnOrderingEntitymaywithholdanypaymenttoContractorforthepurposeofmitigatingtheOrderingEntity’sdamages,untilsuchtimeastheexactamountofdamagesduetotheOrderingEntityfromContractorisdetermined.AriOrderingEntitymaywithholdanyamountthatmaybedueContractorastheOrderingEntitydeemsnecessarytoprotectagainstloss,includinglossasaresultofoutstandingliens,claimsofformerlienholders,orfortheexcesscostsincurredinprocuringsubstituteGoodsorServices.ContractorshallbeliableforexcesscostsincurredbytheOrderingEntityinprocuringfromthirdPartiesreplacementWorkorsubstituteGoodsand/orServices.ContractEarlyTenninationinthePublicInterest.TheParticipatingStateisenteringintothisAddendumforthepurposeofcarryingoutthepublicpolicyoftheStateofColorado,asdeterminedbyitsGovernor,GeneralAssembly,and/orCourts.IfthisAddendumceasestofurtherthepublicpolicyoftheState,theState,initssolediscretion.mayterminatethisAddendum,andanyOrder,inwholeorinpart.ExercisebytheParticipatingStateofthisrightshallnotconstituteabreachoftheState’soranyOrderingEntity’sobligationshereunder.ThissubsectionshallnotapplytoatenninationofthisAddendumbytheStateforcauseorbreachbyContractor,whichshallbegovernedby§13.Aorasothennlisespeci?callyprovidedherein.MethodandContent.TheStateshallnotifyContractorofsuchterminationinaccordancewith§SoftheAddendum.ThenoticeshallspecifytheeffectivedateoftheterminationandwhetheritaffectsalloraportionofthisAddendumandanyOrders.ObligationsandRights.Uponreceiptofaterminationnotice,Contractorshallbesubjecttoandcomplywithmesameobligationsandrightssetforthin§13(A)(i).Paymentsa)IfthisAddendumisterminatedbytheParticipatingStatepursuanttothis§13(B),26D)ContractorRev06r'0l/15Page 233 of 268
CMS£134032COREDOClDlI20l I42shallbepaidbyrespectiveOrderingEntitiesforalloutstandingOrdersanamountwhichbearsthesameratiotothetotalreimbursementunderthoseOrdersasContractorsobligationsthatweresatisfactorilyperfonnedbeartothetotalobligationssetforthineachOrder.lesspaymentspreviouslymade.b)Additionally,ifanOrderislessthansixty(60)percentcompleted,anOrderingEntitymayreimburseContractorforaportionofactualout-of-pocketexpenses(notothenuisereimbursedunderthisContract)incurredbyContractorwhicharedirectlyattributabletotheunoompletedportionofContractor'sobligationshereunder;providedthatthesumofanyandallreimbursementshallnotexceedthemaximumamountpayabletoContractorbyanOrderingEntityundersuchOrder.C.Sute’sOptiontoTerminate.TheParticipatingStatemay,atanytime,terminatethisAddendumbysendingpriorwrittennoticetotheContractor,Suchnoticeshallstatetheeffectivedateoftermination,whichshallbenolessthanthirty(30)calendardaysafterthedateofthenotice.D.RemediesNotInvolvingcontractTemilnatlon.TheParticipatingState,initssolediscretion,mayexerciseoneormoreofthefollowingremediesinadditiontootherremediesavailabletoit:i.SuspendPerformance.SuspendContractor'sperformancewithrespecttoalloranypor?onofthisAddendumpendingnecessarycorrectiveactionasspeci?edbytheStatewithoutentitlingContractortoanadjustmentinpricelcostorperformanceschedule.ContractorshallpromptlyceaseperformanceandincurringcostsinaccordancewiththeState'sdirectiveandtheStateshallnotbeliableforcostsincurredbyContractorafterthesuspensionofperformanceunderthisprovision.ii.WlthholdPayment.WrthholdpaymenttoContractoruntilcorrectionsinContractorsperformancearesatisfactorilymadeandcompleted.III.DenyPayment.Denypaymentforthoseobligationsnotperformedthat,duetoContractorsactionsorinaction’s,cannotbeperformedor,ifperformed,wouldbeofnovaluetotheState,provided,thatanydenialofpaymentshallbereasonablyrelatedtothevaluetotheStateoftheobligationsnotperformed.iv.Removal.Notwithstandinganyotherprovisionherein,theStatemaydemandimmediateremovalofanyofContractorsemployees,agents.orSubcontractorswhomtheStatedeemsincompetent,careless,insubordinate,unsuitable,orotherwiseunacceptable,orwhosecontinuedparticipationunderthisAddendumisdeemedtobecontrarytothepublicinterestortheState'sbestinterest.E.IntellectualProperty.IfContractorinfringesonapatent,copyright,trademark,tradesecretorotherintellectualpropertyrightwhileperformingitsobligationsunderthisAddendum,Contractorshall,attheState'soptionoranOrderingEntity’:option(i)obtainfortheStateorContractortherighttousesuchGoodsandServices;(ii)replaceanyGoodsinvolvedintheperformanceoftheServiceswithnon~infringingGoods,ormodifythemsothattheybecomenon-infringing;or,(III)ifneitheroftheforegoingalternativesarereasonablyavailable,removeordiscontinueanyinfringingServicesorGoodsandrefundthepricepaid(a)fortheaffectedproductinthe?rstyearorthedepreciatedvaluethereafteror;(b)forsupportservices,thebalanceofanypre-paidamountor;(c)forprofessionalservicesrenderedtotheState.F.Non-StateOrderingEntltyRemedies.Non-StateOrderingEntitiesmayincludeotherremediesinthetermsoftheOrderstheyplace.G.DelayorNonperfonnance—LlquldatedDamages.IfanOrderingEntityprovidesContractorwithwrittennoticeofdelayornonperformanceunderanOrderinaccordancewith§5oftheAddendum,andContractorfailstocuresuchdelayornonperformancewithinthetimespeci?edinsuchnotice,thentotheextentsuchOrdercontainsaliquidateddamagesprovision,Contractorshallbeliablefortheliquidateddamagesinadditiontoanyotherapplicabledamagesasprovidedtherein.14.GOVERNMENTALIMMUNITYLiabilityforclaimsforinjuriestopersonsorpropertyarisingfromthenegligenceoftheStateofColorado,27Rev0630]/I5Page 234 of 268
CMSit34032COREDOC[DItlolooooooooo-0000-oI42itsdepartments,institutions,agencies,boards.officials,andemployeesiscontrolledandlimitedbytheprovisionsoftheGovernmentalImmunityAct.CRS§24-10-101,etseq.andtheriskmanagementstatutes,CRS§24-30-1501,etseq.,asamended.15.STATEWIDECONTRACTMANAGEMENTSYSTEMA.IfthemaximumamountpayabletoContractorbyanyoneStateOrderingEntityunderthisAddendumis$100,000orgreater.eitherontheEffectiveDateoratanytimethereafter.this§15applies.i.Contractoragreestobegoverned,andtoabide,bytheprovisionsofCR5§24-102-205,§24-102-206,§24-103-601,§24-103.5-101and§24-105-102concerningthemonitoringofContractorperformanceonStateContractsandinclusionofContractperformanceinformationinastatewideContractManagementSystem.ii.Contractor’sperformanceshallbesubjecttoEvaluationandReviewinaccordancewiththetermsandconditionsofthisAddendum,Statelaw,includingCRS§24-103.5-101,andStateFiscalRules,PoliciesandGuidance.EvaluationandReviewofContractorsperformanceshallbepartofthenormalContractadministrationprocessandContractor'sperformancewillbesystematicallyrecordedinthestatewideContractManagementSystem.iv.AttheendoftheAddendumterm,theStateOrderingEntityshallcompleteandsubmitaperformanceEvaluationinaformsubstantiallyequivalenttoExhibit3(SampleContractorPerfomlanceEvaluation).AreasofEvaluationandReviewshallinclude,butshallnotbelimitedtoquality,costandtimeliness.CollectionofinformationrelevanttotheperformanceofContractor'sobligationsunderthisAddendumshallbedeterminedbythespeci?crequirementsofsuchobligationsandshallincludefactorstailoredtomatchtherequirementsofContractor'sobligations.SuchperformanceinformationshallbeenteredintothestatewideContractManagementSystematintervalsestablishedbyStateOrderingEntitiesanda?nalEvaluation,ReviewandRatingshallberenderedwithinthirty(30)daysoftheendoftheAddendumterm.Contractorshallbenoti?edfollowingeachperformanceEvaluationandReview,andshalladdressorcorrectanyidenti?edprobleminatimelymannerandmaintainWorkprogress,Shouldthe?nalperformanceEvaluationandReviewdeterminethatContractordemonstratedagrossfailuretomeettheperformancemeasuresestablishedhereunder.theExecutiveDirectoroftheColoradoDepartmentofPersonnelandAdministration(ExecutiveDirector),uponrequestbytheStatePurchasingOf?ce.andshowingofgoodcause,maydebarContractorandprohibitContractorfrombiddingonfutureContracts.Contractormaycontestthe?nalEvaluation.ReviewandRatingby:(i)?lingrebuttalstatements,whichmayresultineitherremovalorcorrectionoftheEvaluation(CRS§24-105-102(6)).or(II)underCRS§24-105-102(6),exercisingthedebarmentprotestandappealrightsprovidedinCRS§24-109-106,107,201or202,whichmayresultinthereversalofthedebannentandreinstatementofContractor,bytheExecutiveDirector,uponashowingofgoodcause.Contractorshallbenoti?edfollowingeachperfonnanceEvaluationandReview,andshalladdressorcorrectanyidenti?edprobleminatimelymannerandmaintainWorkprogress.Contractormay28Rev06/01/15Page 235 of 268
CMSifE4032COKEDOCIDt1mI 4l4zcontestthe?nalEvaluation,Reviewandratingby?lingrebuttalstatements,whichmayresultineitherremovalorcorrectionoftheEvaluation(CR8§24-105-102(6)).16.GENERALPROVISIONSA.Assignmentandsubcontracts.Contractofsrightsandobligationshereunderarepersonalandmaynotbetransferred,assignedorsubcontractedwithouttheprior,writtenconsentoftheParticipatingState,whichshallnotbeunreasonablywithheld.Anyattemptatassignment,transfer,subcontractingwithoutsuchconsentshallbevoid.Allassignments,subcontracts,orSubcontractorsapprovedbyContractorortheStatearesubjecttoalloftheprovisionshereof.Contractorshallbesolelyresponsibleforallaspectsofsubcontractingarrangementsandperformance.BindingEffect.Exceptasotherwiseprovidedin§18(A),allprovisionshereincontained,includingthebene?tsandburdens,shallextendtoandbebindingupontheParties’respectiveheirs,legalrepresentatives,successors,andassigns.Captions.ThecaptionsandheadingsinthisAddendumareforconvenienceofreferenceonly,andshallnotbeusedtointerpret,de?ne,orlimititsprovisions.Counterparts.ThisAddendummaybeexecutedinmultipleidenticaloriginalcounterparts,allofwhichshallconstituteoneAgreement.EntireUnderstanding.ThisAddendum,togetherwiththeMasterAgreement,representsthecompleteintegrationofallunderstandingsbetweentheParties,andallpriorrepresentationsandunderstandings.oralorwritten,aremergedherein.Priororcontemporaneousadditions,deletions,orotherchangesheretoshallnothaveanyforceoreffectwhatsoever,unlessembodiedherein.Indemni?cation.Contractorshallindemnify,save,andholdhannlesstheState.itsemployeesandagents,againstanyandallthird-partyclaims,damages,liabilityandcourtawardsincludingcosts,expenses,andattorneyfeesandrelatedcosts,incurredasaresultofanynegligentorintentionalactoromissionbyContractor,oritsemployees,agents,Subcontractors,orassigneespursuanttothetermsofthisCon?act;however,theprovisionshereofshallnotbeconstruedorinterpretedasawaiver,expressorimplied,ofanyoftheimmunities,rights,benefits,protection,orotherprovisions,oftheColoradoGovernmentalImmunityAct,CR8§24-10-101etseq.,ortheFederalTortClaimsAct,28U.S.C.2671etseq.,asapplicable,asnoworhereafteramended.JurisdictionandVenue.AllsuitsoractionsrelatedtothisAddendumshallbe?ledandproceedingsheldintheStateofColoradoandexclusivevenueshallbeintheCityandCountyofDenver.Modificationi.BythePartiesa)Exceptasspeci?callyprovidedinthisAddendum,modi?cationsofthisAddendumshallnotbeeffectiveunlessagreedtoinwritingbythePartiesinanamendmenttothisAddendum,properlyexecutedandapprovedinaccordancewithapplicableColoradoStatelawandStateFiscalRules.b)Modi?cationspermittedunderthisAddendum,otherthanamendments,shallconformtothepoliciesoftheOf?ceoftheStateController,including,butnotlimitedto,thepolicyentitledMODIFICATIONSOFCONTRACTS-TOOLSANDFORMS.ii.ByOperationofLaw.ThisAddendumissubjecttosuchmodi?cationsasmayberequiredbychangesinFederalorColoradoStatelaw,ortheirimplementingregulations.Anysuchrequiredmodi?cationautomaticallyshallbeincorporatedintoandbepartofthisAddendumontheefiectivedateofsuchchange,asiffullysetforthherein.OrderofPrecedence.TheprovisionsofthisAddendumshallgoverntherelationshipoftheParties.Intheeventofcon?ictsorinconsistenciesbetweenthisAddendumanditsExhibitsandOtherAttachments,including,butnotlimitedto,thoseprovidedbyContractor,suchcon?ictsorinconsistenciesshallberesolvedbyreferencetothedocumentsinthefollowingorderofpriority:i.§4.D.vi.and§17ofthisExhibitAtotheAddendum,HIPPAandFFATAii.§18ofthisExhibitAtotheAddendum,ColoradoSpecialProvisions,29Rev06/011]5Page 236 of 268
CMSllB4032COREDOCIDN20l6 l42III.TheprovisionsofthemainbodyofthisAddendumandthisExhibitA,a)TheprovisionsoftheMasterAgreement,andb)TheprovisionsofeachOrder.Notwithstandinganythingtothecontraryherein,theStateandOrderingEntitiesshallnotbesubjecttoanyprovisionincorporatedinanyexhibitattachedhereto,anyprovisionincorporatedinanytermsandconditionsappearingonContractorsorSubcontractorswebsite,anyprovisionincorporatedintoanyclickthroughoronlineAgreements,oranyprovisionincorporatedintoanyotherdocumentorAgreementbetweenthePartiesthat(a)requirestheStateorOrderingEntitytoindemnifyContractororanyotherParty,(b)isinviolationofStatelaws,regulations,rules,?scalrules.policies,orotherStateorOrderingEntityrequirementsasdeterminedsolelybytheStateorOrderingEntity,or(c)iscontrarytoanyoftheprovisionsincorporatedinto§16orthemainbodyofthisAddendum.J.severablllty.ProvidedthisAddendumcanbeexecutedandperformanceoftheobligationsofthePartiesaccomplishedasintended,theprovisionshereofareseverableandanyprovisionthatisdeclaredinvalidorbecomesinoperableforanyreasonshallnotaffectthevalidityofanyotherprovisionhereof,providedthatthePartiescancontinuetoperformtheirobligationsunderthisAddenduminaccordancewithitsintent.K.SurvlvalofCertainAddendumTerms.Notwithstandinganythinghereintothecontrary,provisionsofthisAddendumrequiringcontinuedperformance,compliance,oreffectafterterminationhereof,shallsurvivesuchterminationandshallbeenforceablebytheStateoranOrderingEntityifContractorfailstoperformorcomplyasrequired.L.ThirdPartyBene?ciaries.EnforcementofthisAddendumandallrightsandobligationshereunderarereservedsolelytotheParties.AnyServicesorbene?tswhichthirdPartiesreceiveasaresultofthisAddendumareincidentaltotheAddendum,anddonotcreateanyrightsforsuchthirdParties.M,Walver.Waiverofanybreachunderatem,provision,orrequirementofthisAddendum,oranyrightorremedyhereunder,whetherexplicitlyorbylackofenforcement,shallnotbeconstruedordeemedasawaiverofanysubsequentbreachofsuchtenn,provisionorrequirement,orofanyotherterm,provision,orrequirement.N.CORADisclosure.Totheextentnotprohibitedbyfederallaw.thisAddendumandtheperformancemeasuresandstandardsunderCRS§24-103.6-101,ifany,aresubjecttopublicreleasethroughtheColoradoOpenRecordsAct,CR5§24-72-101,etseq.0.SexOffenderRegistryCheck.Ifinthecourseofdoingbusiness,aContractorsemployeeanditsSubcontractors,andlorauthorizeddealers/distributors,visitsaStatefacilitythathasasclientschildrenundertheageof21onthepremises,ContractorshallcompleteasexoffenderregistrycheckoneachsuchemployeepriortosuchemployeegoingtoanysuchStatefacility.IntheeventaContractofsemployeeisontheregistry,suchemployeeshallnotbesenttoaStatefacilityandwillnotbeadmittedtosuchfacility.LinktoaccesstheColoradoDepartmentofPublicSafety’swebsite:hgtg://gg§web.g@te.cg.g_sI(ReferenceCRS§16-22-110,SexOffenderRegistry.)17.FEDERALFUNDINGACCOUNTABILITYANDTRANSPARENCYACTOF2004(“FFATA")IforwhenanOrderingEntityplacesanOrderusingFFATAfunds,theOrderingEntityshallimmediatelynotifytheParticipatingStateandContractorandsuchOrdershallincludethe“StateofColoradoSupplementalProvisionsforFederallyFundedContracts,Grants,andPurchaseOrdersSubjecttotheFederalFundingAccountabilityandTransparencyActof2006,asamended,‘assuchprovisionsmaybemodi?edfromtimetotime.TheFFATAprovisionsareavailableonthewebsiteoftheColoradoStateControllerat:httgs://www.Coloradogovlgacific/oscltfata.TheParticipatingStateandtheOrderingEntityagreetocomplywithallapplicablefederalandStatereportingrequirementsfortheuseofFFATAfunds.ContractorshallprovidetherequiredreporttotheOrderingEntitywiththeinvoicepresentedtotheOrderingEntityforpayment.ThePartiesacknowledgethatContractor,forpurchasesunderthisAddendum,isnotaSubcontractororsub~grantee.butaproviderofGoodsandrelatedServices.18.COLORADOSPECIALPROVISIONSTheseSpecialProvisionsapplytoallStateAgencies,OtherStateDepartmentsandState-fundedInstitutionsofHigherEducationContractsandOrdersexceptwherenotedinitalics.30Rev06:01/I5Page 237 of 268
CMSIt54032COREDOC[DR2ol I42CONTROLLER'SAPPROVAL.CRS§24-30-202(1).ThisAddendumshallnotbevaliduntilithasbeenapprovedbytheColoradoStateControllerordesignee.FUNDAVAILABILITY.CRS§24-30-Z02(5.5).FinancialobligationsoftheStatepayableafterthecurrentFiscalYeararecontingentuponfundsforthatpurposebeingappropriated.budgeted,andotherwisemadeavailable.GOVERNMENTALIMMUNITY.NotermorconditionofthisAddendumshallbeconstruedorinterpretedasawaiver,expressorimplied,ofanyoftheimmunities,rights,bene?ts,protections,orotherprovisions,oftheColoradoGovernmentalImmunityAct,CR5§24-10-101etseq.,ortheFederalTortClaimsAct,28U.S.C.§1346(b)and2671etseq.,asapplicablenoworhereafteramended.INDEPENDENTCONTRACTOR.ContractorshallperformitsdutieshereunderasanindependentContractorandnotasanemployee.NeitherContractornoranyagentoremployeeofContractorshallbedeemedtobeanagentoremployeeoftheState.ContractoranditsemployeesandagentsarenotentitledtounemploymentinsuranceorWorkerscompensationbenefitsthroughtheStateandtheStateshallnotpayfororotherwiseprovidesuchcoverageforContractororanyofitsagentsoremployees.COMPLIANCEWITHLAW.ContractorshallstrictlycomplywithallapplicablefederalandStatelaws,rules,andregulationsineffectorhereafterestablished,including,withoutlimitation,lawsapplicabletodiscriminationandunfairemploymentpractices.CHOICEOFLAW.Coloradolaw,andmlesandregulationsissuedpursuantthereto,shallbeappliedintheinterpretation,execution,andenforcementofthisAddendum.Anyprovisionincludedorincorporatedhereinbyreferencewhichoon?iotswithsaidlaws.rules,andregulationsshallbenullandvoid.AnyprovisionincorporatedhereinbyreferencewhichpurportstonegatethisoranyotherSpecialProvisioninwholeorinpartshallnotbevalidorenforceableoravailableinanyactionatlaw,whetherbywayofcomplaint,defense.orotherwise.AnyprovisionrenderednullandvoidbytheoperationofthisprovisionshallnotinvalidatetheremainderofthisAddendum,totheextentcapableofexecution.BINDINGARBITRATIONPROHIBITED.TheStateofColoradodoesnotagreetobindingarbitrationbyanyextra-judicialbodyorperson.AnyprovisiontothecontraryinthisAddendumorincorporatedhereinbyreferenceshallbenullandvoid.SOFTWAREPIRACYPROHIBITION.Governor'sExecutiveOrderD00200.StateorotherpublicfundspayableunderthisAddendumshallnotbeusedfortheacquisition,operation,ormaintenanceofcomputersoftwareinviolationoffederalcopyrightlawsorapplicablelicensingrestrictions.Contractorherebycertifiesandwarrantsthat.duringthetermofthisAddendumandanyextensions.Contractorhasandshallmaintaininplaceappropriatesystemsandcontrolstopreventsuchimproperuseofpublicfunds.IftheStatedeterminesthatContractorisinviolationofthisprovision,theStatemayexerciseanyremedyavailableatlaworinequityorunderthisAddendum,including.withoutlimitation,immediatetenninationofthisAddendumandanyremedyconsistentwithfederalcopyrightlawsorapplicablelicensingrestrictions.EMPLOYEEFINANCIALINTERESTICONFLICTOFINTEREST.CRS§24-18-201and§24-50-507.Thesignatoriesaverthattotheirknowledge,noemployeeoftheStatehasanypersonalorbene?cialinterestwhatsoeverintheserviceorpropertydescribedinthisAddendum.Contractorhasnointerestandshallnotacquireanyinterest,directorindirect,thatwouldconflictinanymannerordegreewiththeperformanceofContractor‘sServicesandContractorshallnotemployanypersonhavingsuchknowninterests.VENDOROFFSET.CRS524-so-202(1)and§z4-so-202.4.[NotapplicabletointergovernmentalAgreements]SubjecttoCRS§24-30-202.4(3.5),theStateControllermaywithholdpaymentundertheState'svendoroffsetinterceptsystemfordebtsowedtoStateAgenciesfor:(I)unpaidchildsupportdebtsorchildsupportarrearages;(ii)unpaidbalancesoftax,accruedinterest,orotherchargesspeci?edinCRS§39-21-101,etseq;(III)unpaidloanscluetotheStudentLoanDivisionoftheDepartmentofHigherEducation;(iv)amountsrequiredtobepaidtotheUnemployment31Rev06/Oi/15Page 238 of 268
CMSIIN032COREDOClD#wl l42CompensationFund;and(V)otherunpaiddebtsowingtoheStateasaresultof?nalagencydeterminationorjudicialaction.PUBLICCONTRACTSFORSERVICES.CRS§8-17.5-101.[NotapplicabletoAgreementsrelatingtotheoffer,issuance,orsaleofsecurities,investmentadvisoryServicesorfundmanagementServices,sponsoredprojects,intergovernmentalAgreements,orinformationtechnologyServicesorproductsandServices]Contractorcerti?es,warrants,andagreesthatitdoesnotknowinglyemployorContractwithanillegalalienwhowillperformWorkunderthisAddendumandwillcon?rmtheemploymenteligibilityofallemployeeswhoarenewlyhiredforemploymentintheUnitedStatestoperformWorkunderthisAddendum,throughparticipationintheE-VerifyProgramortheStateprogramestablishedpursuanttoCRS§8-17.5-102(5)(c),ContractorshallnotknowinglyemployorContractwithanillegalalientoperformWorkunderthisAddendumorenterintoaContractwithaSubcontractorthatfailstocertifytoContractorthattheSubcontractorshallnotknowinglyemployorContractwithanillegalalientoperformWorkunderthisAddendum.Contractor(i)shallnotuseE-VerifyProgramorStateprogramprocedurestoundertakepre-employmentscreeningotjobapplicantswhilethisAddendumisbeingperformed,(ii)shallnotifytheSubcontractorandthecontractingStateagencywithintl1ree(3)daysifContractorhasactualknowledgethataSubcontractorisemployingorcontractingwithanillegalalienforWorkunderthisAddendum,(iii)shallterminatethesubcontractifaSubcontractordoesnotstopemployingorcontractingwiththeillegalalienwithinthree(3)daysofreceivingthenotice.and(iv)shallcomplywithreasonablerequestsmadeintheoourseofaninvestigation,undertakenpursuanttoCRS§8-11.5-102(5),bytheColoradoDepartmentofLaborandEmployment.ItContractorparticipatesintheStateprogram,ContractorshalldelivertothecontractingStateagency.InstitutionofHigherEducationorPoliticalSubdivision,awritten,notarizedaffirmation,affirmingthatContractorhasexaminedthelegalWorkstatusofsuchemployee,andshallcomplywithalloftheotherrequirementsoftheStateprogram.IfContractorfailstocomplywithanyrequirementofthisprovisionorCR5§8-17.5-101etseq.,thecontractingStateagency,InstitutionofHigherEducationorPoliticalSubdivisionmayterminatethisAddendumforbreachand,ifsoterminated,Contractorshallbeliablefordamages.PUBLICCONTRACTSWITHNATURALPERSONS.CR5§24-78.5-1I11.Contractor,ifanaturalpersoneighteen(18)yearsofageorolder,herebyswearsandaf?rmsunderpenaltyofperjurythatheorshe(I)isacitizenorotherwiselawlullypresentintheUnitedStatespursuanttofederallaw,(ll)shallcomplywiththeprovisionsofCR5§24-76.6-101etseq.,and(III)hasproducedoneformofidenti?cationrequiredbyCR5§24-76.5-103priortotheeffectivedateofthisAddendum.SP5Elteutve01/01/09THERESTOFTHISPAGEINTENTIONALLYLEI<'l‘BLANK32Rev06/Di/15Page 239 of 268
CW5;K4032COREDOCID:4IDlsoo0<m0<x>000o—oi41EXHIBIT1-SAMPLEOPTIONLETTERDate:OrlglnalContractCMS#:OptlonLetter#CMSRouting#1)OPTION.Optiontorenewonly(foranadditionalterm)2)REQUIREDPROVISIONS.InaccordancewithSection(s)oftheOriginalContractbetweentheStateofColorado.DepartmentofPersonnel&Administration,StatePurchasingOfficeandInsertLegalNameofContractor,theStateherebyexercisesitsoptionforanadditionaltermbeginningInsertstartdateandendingonInsertendingdateatacostlpricespeci?edinSection,Exhibit3)EFFECTIVEDATE.TheeffectivedateofthisOptionLetterisuponapprovaloftheStateControlleror,whicheverislater.STATEOFCOLORADOJohnW.Hlckenlooper,GovernorNameofAgencyorIHEBy:InsertName8.TitleofPersonSigningforAgencyorIHEDate:CRS§24-30-202requiresthestateControllertoapproveallStateContracts.ThisOptionLetterisnotvaliduntilsignedanddatedbelowbytheStateControllerordelegate.ContractorIsnotauthorizedtobeginperfonnanceuntilsuchtime.IfContractorbeginsperformingprlorthereto,theStateofColoradoisnotobligatedtopayContractorforsuchperformanceorforanyGoodsandlorServicesprovidedhereunder.vSTATECONTROLLERRobertJaros,CPA,MBA,JDBy:InsertNameofAgencyorIHEDelegate-PleasedeleteifContractwillberoutedtoOSCforapprovalDate:33Rev06/01/I5Page 240 of 268
CMS5W032COREDOCIDK20I I42EXHIBIT2—SA]V?’LESUMMARYCONTRACTORVOLUMEREPORTSTATEOFCOLORADOsmmmpIeled[MmIo:sun:Pun!-ulnlD?lceL-:25E1-ermansnm,1-mmFloovnmm,:0mmormanIa&muepomngmm:-Plummmmnpgrcpvimup.«o¢~w-.........m<—rmmHighlighfcdAreasVENDORQUARTERLYSUMMARYVOLUMEREPORTVendorHume:‘CnnlanPernm:,.x2-muAddress:XPhone:‘‘om:‘CnlnrldoPriceAxreemzmll:xCnmmn?ilvorsuvicemm:_IuIy-Seplemher:1<—Se/edone/mm>maDropDownMannnuaomn:Yul-Plus:selecltheIormoprllleyear:IN13_j‘SPOsourcingSnoclallncomm»Pleas:selecttheSpecialistande-nuilthisformtn"IMVW""'°°'13'“)5595151M“"V>""¢"'°5"l€WW_'salesomIuponed'’“M°,EmvYulalSalesDallnrsluularmmPridng_TotalPawav,YhlsQuzner‘clmuSlles’‘’'‘"‘‘"dm‘S'''"‘‘cummuaaumuncam‘'°"'°'“'‘5"“meAlenzvesIncownerssunmnmmms'5'5°"5’“"5’°"Hlxhersamum5~5-5ones-mss-M$-5»5not5-ms5-WK$-5-S0%S-M6$-ass-S-S9%S-MS5-0%.Nan:Mnkech-ckmamIo’sux:nlEA4arxdn".Sandla:wmaosunvumm.Dllkn,zszssh-munSunk.umFlaw,Denv:1,CDsummom:1ramsalesbo?alsthisowner-AllachdetailedrmnruldzulowmnlhueInlouuu.2lewlorluu]Mdnga/Totolsaler1»;ml/CatalanIMmmm:and9hmaneanvduscoums.3Lmmumtcoscsamngx»savingslath:sumandasisadire<lmunalmlsnrloeltreemenl.aTom!Pvlrlhy(nu-meraalcm-mm;thepnrlinnulmmsalesandasonbyumslamFramremenlCardacreditcards5mayEreenSale!-nenemmepommnllvulxulesmmmm:hasEnvlrunmnnlillymruam.illrlhulrs.spolnmlsummson;,ExamplesVnzludnElly/Cuunlv/|m=lGrwemmuns,SpecialDistricts(S:hun|,Five,Wllu,Ynnwunnionmg)7»non-no/m-0r|Iniziliunxquali?udinuh.SliluPuninirxingemu:mmanc.R.s2l»uD-2n7.5.ICoIom4oAdmInIsDalIonIn-onlywplinhletopriceIgreemenuwhenKMSntemumngaIn.I/undo!mummyenterssroUseOnlyum;/cummenu:(enlevhexe-->yDiv:Enteredmanb1.34Rev06/0]/I5Page 241 of 268
CMSit34032COREDOClD#N| Ul42EXHIBIT3—SAMPLECONTRACTORPERFORMANCEEVALUATIONStateofColoradoContractManagementInformationFINALContractorPerformanceEvaluationColoradoRevisedStatutes§24~l0Z-205(6)ofemhpersonalServicesconnectwithavenueovertl00,D00,theindividualselectedbythestateagencyorinstitutionof?igherEducalimr(ll-IE),pursuanttocns§24—lD3.S—l0l(3),IomonitorthesonmmrsWorkunderthecontract[ContractMonitor)shallcttlllplettthisnmu.ContractorPerforlnmlceravitiuiioo(Evaluation)andsubmitthecompletedEvaluationtothecontractorto.ReviewandcommentpursuanttoCRS§24-103.5-10l(6)ThisEvaluationandeonu'al;tor‘sresponse,ifanly,shallbeaddedtothestatewidecounosiManagementsysiein(CMS)withintlritly(so)daysaltercontractcompletionandbeeotnepubliclyavailableaspartoftheState’:senrchnblewebsiteSolicitingStateAgenciesandll-lEsarerequiredtorevieweonipieieoEvnluntionspriortoinulong{ulutecontractaward:toEmurethattheprospectivecontractormeetsapplicableresponsibilityAcustomerwhodisputesanyinftrrrnutinncontainedinonEvaluationnuiyexeieisetheoontrnclngiiissetforthinCR552A-109-106,107,201or202.CompletingtltltForm>ggmggmmumgmmm,theconoseiMonitorsnouensurethatALLapplicablefieldsinCMSonecompleteduponconclusionnfthecontact3»TheContractMonitororProcurementSu?snortsubmitarecompletedEvaluationtotheoonmioiforReviewandcommentwithintlnrly(30)saysofcontractcompletion.>ThesuiteagencyorIHEshallmaintainmasEvaluationandconnectorsresponse,ifany,aspartoruso?icialcontractareandshallposttileEvaluationonCMSwill-rmtltiny(30)dzysofuontractcovnpletion.>ThisEvaluationshallrclll?lllaparturcwlsfuratlessrive(5)yeltrslollowingthenoteitisInacltedtomecmssonuueimoistCR5.§24-I05-I02(4).>lfxlreeonoueiisonoonstmctionServiceswithavalueof$500,0000!more,theContractMonitorumshallcompletetheformentitled"ConstnlctionContractorFinalrerrpnnonpeEvaluationReport".>ThisEvaluationismuequiredforcontractsunderMedicare,the“ColoradoMedicalAssistnnoeAc1",ArtieIes4to.5ofTitIe255,CR5,the“Children'sBasici-ieumiPlanAct",Anicle3ofTitIe255,015,orlhe“ColoradolndigentCateProgram",PartIofArticIz3ofTiLle25.5,CR5.CMSIdenti?cationNumber:,ContractCompletionDate:NameofStateAgency/I]-IE:NameofContractor/Grantee:NameofProject/Program:ContractorPerformance—EvnluationconductedaftercompletionofServicesContractormetrequirementsrelatedtoQuality:YesNoContractormetrequirementrelatedtoCost:Yes:|NoDContractormetrequirementsrelatedtoTimeliness:YesDNoDBrie?yindicatettrea(s)ofnon-complianceandstepstakentoremedy:lndiciatenumberanddatesofinterimperformanceEvaluationworksheetscompletedforthisContract:OverallRatingofContraetorPerformance:BelowStandard|:IStandard|:IAboveStandardI:ThefollowingtobecompletedbytheStatefollowingsubmittnltoContractorforReviewProvidedContractorwithopportunitytoReviewEvaluation?(Datesent:)YesE]No3ContractorsubmittedresponsetoEvaluation?(Daterebuttalreoeived:)YesDNoDContractordisputedEvaluation?(DateDisputereceived:)YesNoIIlfNo,explain:Bysigningbelow,IacknowledgethatlhavecompletedthisFinalContractorPerformanceEvaluationinaccordancewithCRS§24-102-205(6)Signature:Title:PrintNnme:Date:Phone:35Rev06/0]/ISPage 242 of 268
1)2)3)4)6)7)8)9)11.I)2)CMSi!B4032COREDOCIDII20| |4ZEXHIBIT4—IRSREQUIREMENTPERFORMANCEInperformanceofthisContract,theContractoragreestocomplywithandassumeresponsibilityforcompliancebyhisorheremployeeswiththefollowingrequirements:AllWorkwillbedoneunderthesupervisionoftheContractorortheContractor’semployees.Anyreturnorreturninfon-nationmadeavailableinanyformatshallbeusedonlyforcarryingouttheprovisionsofthisContract.lnfonnationcontainedinsuchmaterialwillbetreatedascon?dentialandwillnotbedivulgedormadeknowninanymannertoanypersonexceptasmaybenecessaryintheperfonnanceofthisContract.Disclosuretoanyoneotherthanano?iceroremployeeoftheContractorwillbeprohibited.Allreturnsandreturninfonnationwillbeaccountedforuponreceiptandproperlystoredbefore,during,anda?erprocessing.Inaddition,allrelatedoutputwillbegiventhesamelevelofprotectionasrequiredforthesourcematerial.TheContractorcerti?esthatthedataprocessedduringtheperfon-nanceofthisContractwillbecompletelypurgedfromalldatastoragecomponentsofhisorhercomputerfacility,andtheContractorwillretainnooutputatthetimetheWorkiscompleted.Ifimmediatepurgingofalldatastoragecomponentsisnotpossible,theContractorcerti?esthatanyIRSdataremaininginanystoragecomponentwillbesafeguardedtopreventunauthorizeddisclosures.-AnyspoilageoranyintermediatehardcopyprintoutthatmayresultduringtheprocessingofIRSdatawillbegiventotheagencyorhisorherdesignee.Whenthisisnotpossible,theContractorwillberesponsibleforthedestructionofthespoilageoranyintermediatehardcopyprintouts,andwillprovidetheagencyorhisorherdesigneewithastatementcontainingthedateofdestruction,descriptionofmaterialdestroyed,andthemethodused.Allcomputersystemsprocessing,storing,ortransmittingFederaltaxinformationmustmeettherequirementsde?nedinIRSPublication1075.Tomeetfunctionalandassurancerequirements,thesecurityfeaturesoftheenvironmentmustprovideforthemanagerial,operational,andtechnicalcontrols.AllsecurityfeaturesmustbeavailableandactivatedtoprotectagainstunauthorizeduseofandaccesstoFederaltaxinformation.NoWorkinvolvingFederaltaxinformationfurnishedunderthisContractwillbesubcontractedwithoutpriorwrittenapprovaloftheIRS.TheContractorwillmaintainalistofemployeesauthorizedaccess.Suchlistwillbeprovidedtotheagencyand,uponrequest,totheIRSreviewingoffice.TheagencywillhavetherighttovoidtheContractiftheContractorfailstoprovidethesafeguardsdescribedabove.CRIMINAL/CIVILSANCTIONSEachofficeroremployeeofanypersontowhomreturnsorreturninformationisormaybedisclosedwillbenotifiedinwritingbysuchpersonthatreturnsorretuminfonnationdisclosedtosuchof?ceroremployeecanbeusedonlyforapurposeandtotheextentauthorizedherein,andthatfurtherdisclosureofanysuchreturnsorreturninformationforapurposeortoanextentunauthorizedhereinconstitutesafelonypunishableuponconvictionbya?neofasmuchas$5,000orimprisonmentforaslongas?ve(5)years,orboth,togetherwiththecostsofprosecution.Suchpersonshallalsonotifyeachsuchofficerandemployeethatanysuchunauthorizedfurtherdisclosureofreturnsorreturninfonnationmayalsoresultinanawardofcivildamagesagainsttheofficeroremployeeinanamountnotlessthan$1,000withrespecttoeachinstanceofunauthorizeddisclosure.ThesepenaltiaareprescribedbyIRCsections7213and7431andsetforthat26CFR301.6103(n)-1.Eachofficeroremployeeofanypersontowhoreturnsorretuminfon-nationisormaybedisclosedshallbenoti?edinwritingbysuchpersonthatanyreturnorreturninformationmadeavailableinanyformatshallbeusedonlyforcarryingouttheprovisionsofthisContract.Informationcontainedinsuchmaterialshallbetreatedascon?dentialandshallnotbedivulgedormadeknowninanymannertoanypersonexceptas36Rev06/Ol/l5Page 243 of 268
3)1]].CMSII54032COREDOCIDIIZola-(x)0o-0000-0000-0I42maybenecessaryintheperfonnanceoftheContract.Inspectionbyordisclosuretoanyonewithoutanof?cialneedtoknowconstitutesacriminalmisdemeanorpunishableuponconvictionbya?neofasmuchas$1,000orimprisonmentforaslongasone(1)year,orboth,togetherwiththecostsofprosecution.Suchpersonshallalsonotifyeachsuchofficerandemployeethatanysuchunauthorizedinspectionordisclosureofreturnsorreturninformationmayalsoresultinanawardofcivildamagesagainsttheofficeroremployee[UnitedStatesforFederalemployees]inanamountequaltothesumofthegeaterof$l,000foreachactofunauthorizedinspectionordisclosurewithrespecttowhichsuchdefendantisfoundliableorthesumoftheactualdamagessustainedbytheplaintiffasaresultofsuchunauthorizedinspectionordisclosureplusinthecaseofawillfulinspectionordisclosurewhichistheresultofgrossnegligence,punitivedamages,plusthecostsoftheaction.ThesepenaltiesareprescribedbyIRCsection7213Aand7431.Additionally,itisincumbentupontheContractortoinformitsofficersandemployeesofthepenaltiesforimproperdisclosureimposedbythePrivacyActof1974,5U.S.C.5522.Speci?cally,5U.S.C.S52a(i)(l),whichismadeapplicabletoContractorsby5U.S.C.552a(m)(1),providesthatanyofficeroremployeeofaContractor,whobyvirtueofhis/heremploymentorofficialposition,haspossessionoforaccesstoagencyrecordswhichcontainindividuallyidenti?ableinfonnation,thedisclosureofwhichisprohibitedbythePrivacyActorregulationsestablishedthereunder,andwhoknowingthatdisclosureofthespeci?cmaterialisprohibited,willfullydisclosesthematerialinanymannertoanypersonoragencynotentitledtoreceiveit,shallbeguiltyofamisdemeanorand?nednotmorethan$5,000.INSPECTIONTheIRSandtheAgencyshallhavetherighttosenditsof?cersandemployeesintotheofficesandplantsoftheContractorforinspectionofthefacilitiesandoperationsprovidedfortheperfon-nanceofanyWorkunderthisContract.Basedonsuchinspection,speci?cmeasuresmayberequiredincaseswheretheContractorisfoundtobenoncompliantwithContractsafeguards.37Rev06/0]/15Page 244 of 268
Page 245 of 268
x360 830 G6, TB Dock, S430c, E243m, E243,
GETAC
Page of 1 4
HP Customer Quote 1255239
Contract Number: 2016000000000142NASPO
HP PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FOR CUSTOMER USE ONLY. DO
NOT SHARE
June 9, 2020
Dear Jeromy King,
Thank you for your recent interest in HP Public Sector Sales. Attached is the price quotation you requested.
Please reference this contract: 2016000000000142NASPO when placing this order. The terms and conditions of this contract will apply to
any order placed as a result of this inquiry; no other terms or conditions shall apply.
If you should have questions regarding this quotation or need any other assistance, please contact your Inside Account Representative
All Purchase Orders need to be made out to HP Inc. or HP with the Ordering address referenced below.
The Purchase Order should include the Contract Number in the body of the Purchase Order. Please also be sure to include a copy of the
quote, email address,the ship to location or drop ship locations, delivery date requirements and any other special information and if
applicable, the HP Authorized Reseller Agent name or authorization number for the HP Agent providing you with support.
Orders should be either Faxed to 800-825-2329, emailed to . PSOrderProcessing@hp.com
If you are faxing or emailing this order a sample Purchase Order Document can be downloaded that gives guidance on what is required to
place an order with HP. Click here to download the sample Purchase Order
Ordering address:
HP INC.
Attn: Public Sector Sales
3800 Quick Hill Road
Bldg 2, Suite 100
Austin, TX 78728
City of Englewood
1000 ENGLEWOOD PKWY
Attn: Information Technology
ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110
Exhibit B
Page 246 of 268
x360 830 G6, TB Dock, S430c, E243m, E243,
GETAC
Page of 2 4
HP Customer Quote 1255239
Contract Number: 2016000000000142NASPO
HP PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FOR CUSTOMER USE ONLY. DO
NOT SHARE
Information & Details
Organization name:City of Englewood
Catalog name:2016000000000142NASPO
Created by:andreas.schatz@hp.com
Partner Agent ID:
Name:andreas.schatz@hp.com
Email:Jking@englewoodco.gov
Phone:3037622300
Email notification:andy.s@hp.com
Created:June 9, 2020
Expires:July 9, 2020
Payment method: Purchase Order
Quote total:USD 276,550.91
Billing Information
OM ID:G10049
Company:City of Englewood
Address:
1000 ENGLEWOOD PKWY
Attn: Information Technology
City :ENGLEWOOD
State/Province:Colorado
Zip/postal code:80110
Country:US
Attention to:
Email:
Phone:3037622300
Fax:
Shipping Information
Company:City of Englewood
Address:
1000 ENGLEWOOD PKWY
Attn: Information Technology
City:ENGLEWOOD
State/Province:Colorado
Zip/postal code:80110
Country:US
Attention to:
Email:
Phone:3037622300
Fax:
Delivery date:
Shipping options:
Shipping method:Ship Partial - Ship Items as they
become available
Comments:
Invoice instructions:
Shipping instructions:
Quote Summary
Product #Product Description Manufacturer #Quantity Unit Price Total Price
HP Elitebook x360 830 G6
Reference Model: 31777827
Configuration: 32738351
5 USD 1,393.64
USD 2,670.78
Special price valid until
08/31/2020
USD 6,968.20
5PE05AV HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 Base Model Notebook PC 1
4SS11AV#ABA OS Localization 1
5PE59AV Win 10 Pro 64 1
5YN37AV Wacom AES 2.0 Pen wApp Launch Btn 1
5PE30AV 13.3FHDAGLEDUWVA1000fWANwHDCIRflatTSPVCY 1
5PE64AV 16GB (1x16GB) DDR4 2400 1
5PE76AV 256GB PCIe NVMe Value SSD 1
5PE35AV No Near Field Communication (No NFC)1
5PE84AV IntelWi-Fi6AX200ax2x2MUMIMOnvP160MHz+BT5 1
5PE41AV No WWAN 1
5PE71AV SEC Fingerprint Sensor 1
5PE70AV Active SmartCard 1
5PE02AV 4 Cell 53 WHr Long Life 1
5PE00AV 65 Watt Smart nPFC RA fFstCrg AC Adapter 1
5PF02AV#ABA C5 1.0m stkr CNVTL Power Cord 1
5PE99AV#ABA 3/3/0 Warranty 1
Page 247 of 268
x360 830 G6, TB Dock, S430c, E243m, E243,
GETAC
Page of 3 4
HP Customer Quote 1255239
Contract Number: 2016000000000142NASPO
HP PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FOR CUSTOMER USE ONLY. DO
NOT SHARE
Product #Product Description Manufacturer #Quantity Unit Price Total Price
X9H42AV No vPro AMT supported 1
W0T53AV DIB HP USB-C to RJ45 Adapter 1
5PF13AV#ABA Country Localization 1
5PF12AV#ABA Clickpad BL SR Cllb PVCY 1
X7B43AV eStar Enable IOPT 1
2TD22AV Core i7 sz2 G8 Label 1
UL784E HP 3y Nbd Onsite/ADP/DMR NB Only SVC 1
2UK37UT#ABA HP Thunderbolt Dock 120W G2 5 USD 172.00
USD 266.31
Special price valid until
08/31/2020
USD 860.00
5FW74A8#ABA HP S430c 43.4in Crved Ultrawide US 1 USD 945.00
USD 989.01
Special price valid until
08/31/2020
USD 945.00
1FH48A8#ABA HP PROMO EliteDisplay E243m Monitor 27 USD 185.00
USD 226.71
Special price valid until
08/31/2020
USD 4,995.00
1FH47A8#ABA HP EliteDisplay E243 27 USD 155.00
USD 177.21
Special price valid until
08/31/2020
USD 4,185.00
C005491 Getac V110 G5i78665U116 WebcamWin10 PROx VL51ZDJABUXW 63 USD 3,746.69
USD 4,789.80
Special price valid until
08/31/2020
USD 236,041.47
C001392 Getac Docking Station - 90 W GDOFUR 23 USD 295.54
USD 314.99
Special price valid until
08/31/2020
USD 6,797.42
A950937 Getac Protection Plus - 4 Year Extended Warranty -
Warranty - Maintenance - Parts & Labor - Physical Service
GE-SVTBNFX4Y 63 USD 250.14
USD 260.10
Special price valid until
08/31/2020
USD 15,758.82
Special pricing code: 42184267 Subtotal USD 276,550.91
Total USD 276,550.91
Unless our contract prohibits it, (a) prices are valid for 30 days from quote date and/or (b) HP may change prices or discounts and reissue
quotes immediately if there are increases in costs, tariffs, or other changes outside HP’s control.
If the bill to company and address you wish to use is not present at the time of check out please enter it in the "Shipping Instructions" box.
The order management team will make sure it is billed to the correct location.
Page 248 of 268
x360 830 G6, TB Dock, S430c, E243m, E243,
GETAC
Page of 4 4
HP Customer Quote 1255239
Contract Number: 2016000000000142NASPO
HP PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FOR CUSTOMER USE ONLY. DO
NOT SHARE
Components of Configurable systems may not be ordered separately. Reference Model ID's and Configuration ID's are not part numbers,
they are reference descriptions to your specific configuration.
If you are submitting a hard copy purchase order, please include a printed copy of this quote with your purchase order.
If you place an order for a product that was incorrectly priced, we will cancel your order and credit you for any charges. In the event that
we inadvertently shipped an order based on a pricing error, we will issue a revised invoice to you for the correct price and contact you to
obtain your authorization for the additional charge, or assist you with the return of the product, if payment was not already made. If
payment was already made, HP will work with the agency to correct the invoice. If the pricing error results in an overcharge to you, HP will
credit your account for the amount overcharged.
Page 249 of 268
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Shawn Lewis
DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office
DATE: July 20, 2020
SUBJECT: Approval of Englewood Strategic Plan
DESCRIPTION:
The Englewood Strategic Plan will be used to guide City staff and Council work planning for the
next two years. This action will finalize the plan and trigger regular updates from staff to Council
on progress thereafter.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council approve, by Motion, the Englewood Strategic Plan.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
City Council Vision Retreat: January 27
Confirmation of City Council vision goals: February 10 Study Session
Review and discussion of action plans related to each goal: February 24 Study Session
Srategic Plan and Survey Response Overview: June 10 Study Sessoin
SUMMARY:
Based on the focus areas and goals created at the 2020 Council Vision Retreat, the attached
Strategic Plan was created to achieve Council’s vision. Staff created action steps for each goal
which were vetted by Council on February 10 and again on February 24. The public was
surveyed regarding their priorities related to the Strategic Plan between May 4 and May 18.
Council prioritized and made final edits to the plan at the June 10 Study Session.
Minor edits and prioritization of goals per Council direction June 10 have been added to the
attached final draft Strategic Plan.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
N/A
ALTERNATIVES:
Establish no strategic plan
ATTACHMENTS:
Englewood Strategic Plan Final Draft
Page 250 of 268
Englewood Council Vision Statements
Wink
Stone
Sierra
Russell
Cuesta
Olson
Anderson
Defining Success
Neighborhoods
Goal Translated from Council Thoughts
Create ad hoc design feedback boards (non-binding or not) for design
input for new construction
Establish Neighborhood Resource Program and Neighborhood
Resources Coordinator
Organize neighborhoods into distinct areas with unique identities
Ensure neighbors are connected to one another
Residents feel ownership and connection to law enforcement/code eEnsure residents feel ownership and connection to law
enforcement/code enforcement
Increase walkability through safe, accessible infrastructure
Ensure affordability
Encourage diversity of people and architecture
Encourage neighbor to neighbor connections
Promote resident volunteerism in neighborhoods
Infrastructure
Thoughts Expresssed by Council Goal Translated from Council Thoughts
Establish 20-year plan for financing
Establish a long term Capital Improvement Plan
Establish a City-wide Asset Management Plan
Repair potholes within 7 business days
Englewood City Council Vision Retreat 2020
20-year plan for financing
Englewood will enjoy a rich, natural environment where all people and creatures are respected. Diversity is valued and residents have equal
access to housing, open space and clean air.
Englewood will increase density along the Broadway corridor, downtown, Civic Center area and the hospital district. Housing affordability
will be increased by pursuing a variety of unit types and sizes including smaller units at lower price points. Walking and biking is encouraged
and promoted, and entertainment opportunities are available to residents and the community is connected to one another in meaningful
ways.
Englewood has ample places for residents and families to gather and recreate. Little Dry Creek is uncovered in the central area of the city to
increase such areas. Light rail and bicycle facilities are well used, increasing mobility. The central area of the city enjoys density with
apartments and shops missing the middle-income housing, views of mountains with ample trees, water access and connection
Englewood is a place where people come first. Residents are happy as they enjoy a safe place to live and work, quality infrastructure, and
neighborhoods where new construction is compatible with the character of the neighborhood. Code Enforcement and Police work to
ensure the safety of the neighborhoods, and the City is fiscal responsibility and always mindful of the ability of residents to bear the burden
of infrastructure and services. The City communicates with citizens regularly and effectively, listening and addressing their concerns while
being open and transparent to build trust with the community.
Englewood is an evolving community in the larger Denver metro area. Even as Denver's growth continues southward, Englewood stands as
a shining city on a hill with quality infrastructure, excellent water rights, land reserved for industry where businesses can locate and grow.
There is a place for all homes and home types in Englewood, with similar types clustered in areas of the City planned for density. The
community enjoys retail, restaurants and outstanding entertainment venues like the Gothic Theater as well as excellent parks and trails.
The City of Englewood is a learning organization adapting to our fun, quirky community as highlighted by wayfinding and placemaking
elements such as public art. Sustainability is valued both in terms of living wages, affordable housing and diverse populations that thrive
together. Our community enjoys many tables around which people can gather and resolve differences. Our transportation system is multi-
modal, connecting eclectic neighborhoods that collaborate to achieve great things.
Englewood is a city with quality infrastructure, neighborhoods and a built environment and business climate that attracts and retains home-
grown wealth. Alternative transportation modes connect parks, playgrounds, houses, businesses which are accessible to all. Individuals,
government, businesses and other stakeholders work together to create a culture of neighboring that makes us more productive and safe.
Without potholes
Unique and diverse set of neighborhoods
Neighbors know their neighbors names
Neighbors are volunteering in their neighborhood
Systematic plan for replacing water and sewer lines
Reduce unknowns and surprises
Neighborhood liaison in place
Identify neighborhoods with clear identities
Neighbors are engaged with each other
Walkable
Affordable
Thoughts Expresssed by Council
Design feedback boards--non-binding or with standing
Page 251 of 268
Ensure gutterline matches pavement; patch as needed
Reduce structual risk of flooding for both commerical and residential
properties
Adopt fund specific master plans for anticipated capital improvement
and operational and maintenance expenses
Educate public on the importance of building, maintaining replacing
and funding infrastructure
Local Economy
Thoughts Expresssed by Council Goal Translated from Council Thoughts
Hold commercial vacancy along S Boradway to a minimum by
supporting redevvelopment of aging properties and supporting new
business development in the area
Establish a Downtown Development Authority
Attract and retain a diversified industry mix including retail,
restaurant, manufacturing, medical
Promote business to business transactions and shop local campaigns
Ensure a focus on locally owned and operated businesses
Redevelop and densify City Center
Ensure pro-business climate while maintaining high standards for
development
lncude a hotel as a priority for the redevelopment of CityCenter
Retain and sustain local businesses
Utilize job training and skills development programs for local
businesses, residents and people experiencing homelessness
Assess development codes biannually and modify as needed
Ensure Englewood development process is equivalent to or better
than neighboring communities
Celebrate economic and redevelopment successes and milestones
Educate and communicate with the public on scope of Council's
oversight of development.
Safety
Thoughts Expresssed by Council Goal Translated from Council Thoughts
Develop sustainable solutions for both humans and living things
Pursue zero vehicular, pedestrian, and cyclist deaths
Ensure reduced speed in neighborhoods and traffic calming measures
where appropriate
Build, maintain, replace and fund a quality stormwater drainage
system
Provide community resiliency against manmade and natural disasters
Ensure high quality public safety services
Research and implement innovative and effective best practices used
throughout the country for both Police and Code Enforcement
Ensure the built environment is constructed in a safe manner through
CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design)
Ensure widespread knowledge of property maintenance codes for
both residential and commercial properties
Ensure well maintained residential and commercial properties
throughout the City
Sustainability/Water Resources
Goal Translated from Council Thoughts
Develop plan for long-term, sustainable infrastruture
Pursue a renewable energy grid and energy independence
Increase pollinators in public landscaping, reduce pesticides and
promote bee keeping
Evalaute current materials used and modify or eliminate pesticide
usage if possible
Implement strategies that will respond to climate variability
Promote homeowner and business conservation and sustainability
efforts
Build solar gardens and encourage energy efficient homes and
businesses
Ensure a robust facilities maintenance and a capital plan for building
and equipment replacement
Support/encourage homeowners and businesses in energy/water
conservation and sustainability
Maintain public facilities to maximize life cycle (i.e. Police Building)
Safety of the built environment--traffic calming in general, CEPTD
Educating and communicate to the public rationale for increases--
what are buying
Diversified industries--retail, restaurant, manufacturing, medical
Gutterline matches the pavement
No one worries about having house flooded
Plan as long term as possible
No empty buildings on Broadway
Educate and communicate with the public on abilities and
limitations of City in redevelopment
Downtown Development Authority
Dollars get passed around the city regularly
City Center
Good place to do business where we hold to high standard
Focus on Englewood residents--they own, operate and profit from
projects
Need a hotel
Retain and sustain businesses
Make sure we have consistent regulations between cities
Quality development process
Celebrate successes
Job training--how do we solve issues like homelessness through
training
Solutions are sustainable for both humans and living things
No vehicular, pedestrian, cyclist death
Reduced speed in neighborhoods
Quality stormwater system
Resilient against manmade and natural disasters
Thoughts Expresssed by Council
Green energy usage planning
Structures have bee hives
Reduced pesticides
Implementing strategies responding to climate variability
E3 Awards and scale up
Well maintained public safety services
Remain on innovative side of policing
Educating the public on codes and property maintenance
Ensuring property maintenance
Long-term sustainability of infrastructure
Page 252 of 268
Develop a proactive capital plan to address needed capital and
maintenance of city buildings
Pursue funding partnerships regionally and nationally for water
programs
Pursue initiatives that improve stormwater quality
Increase water conservation efforts
Educate the public regarding water availability, conservation and
individual responsibilities thereto
Improve trash handling and disposal and options for recycling
Improve taste and clarity of Englewood water
Increase efficiency of irrigation systems in parks
Transportation
Thoughts Expresssed by Council Goal Translated from Council Thoughts
Develop a system of non-motorized trails and paths that are safe,
separated from vehicular traffic and connect the entire city (short
term: paint bike lanes and promote protected bike lanes)
Develop traffic calming measures to reduce speed in neighborhoods
Increase ridership on RTD transit options in Englewood
Improve automobile safety and travel times on Broadway, Hampden
and Belleview
Develop integrated mobility systems such as bike and pedestrian
routes and trails through partnerships with surrounding communities
Improve safety and walkability from neighborhoods to parks and
schools
Resolve dangerous crossing areas
Council Prioritization of Focus Areas
Priority Focus Area
1 Infrastructure
2 Local economy
3
4 Neighborhoods
5 Sustainability
6 Transportation
Working with other municipalities to design systems that integrate
mobility systems
Partner with regional and national efforts to identify additional
funding sources
Safe system of mobility, non-motorized, connected to motorized--
incremental is fine
Have a capital plan for building replacement and repair
Stormwater quality
Efficiencies of infrastructure
Education regarding conservation, need to conserve
Consider trash and recycling options
Quality of taste and clarity
Efficiency of irrigation systems in parks
Slow traffic in neighborhoods
Increase ridership of transit options
Driving Hampden, Bellview without fear of losing life and improve
drive times
Safety
Walkability to parks and schools
Addressing problematic crossing areas
Page 253 of 268
Council
Rank
INFRASTRUCTURE 2020 2021 2022 Additional
Funds Needed
in 2021
1 Establish a long term Capital
Improvement Plan
• Develop & implement comprehensive Capital
Improvemenmt Plan (F/U/PW/PRL)
• Continue implementation of comprehensive Capital
Improvemenmt Plan (F/U/PW/PRL)
• Continue implementation of comprehensive
Capital Improvemenmt Plan (F/U/PW/PRL)
2 Establish 20-year plan for financing • Identify revenue opportunities, fee/rate and/or tax
structures, to support COE infrastructure needs; secure
competitive borrowing rates (U/PW/F)
• Complete stormwater rate study (PW/F)
• Complete water & sanitary sewer rate & fee study
(U/F)
• Review & update all sanitary sewer connector district
agreements (U/F)
• Identify revenue opportunities, fee/rate and/or tax
structures, to support COE infrastructure needs; Secure
competitive borrowing rates (F/PW/U/PRL)
• Identify revenue opportunities, fee/rate and/or
tax structures, to support COE infrastructure
needs; Secure competitive borrowing rates
(F/PW/U/PRL)
3 Establish a City-wide Asset Management •Identify asset management systems for buildings, fleet
and capital equipment (PW)
• Implement computerized asset management system
(PW)
• Hire Asset Manager (PW)
• Initiate asset management needs for water and sewer
utilities, and coordinate with established asset
management system in place at South Platte Renew (U)
• Implementation of an asset management system that
has a direct correlation with capital improvement
planning. (PW/U/PRL)
- Complete asset management strategy plan and
coordinate with already completed asset managment
strategy plan for South Platte Renew (U)
- Hire Asset Manager position for Utilities (U)
• Complete asset inventory of three assets
(PW/U/PRL)
$75,000 already budgeted
in PW to purchase "base"
computerized asset
management software;
need additional $60,000 to
include modules for
facilities ($35K) and fleet &
equipment ($25K); $75,000
needed for stormwater
asset management
4 Reduce the number of structures at risk
of flooding in a 25-year storm event by
20%
• Initiate design of stormwater S1 & S2 projects (PW)
• Complete design of stormwater S3A & hospital-area
projects (PW)
• Complete debris removal from Oxford stormwater
pipe (PW)
• Repair Jason Ct/Rotolo Park Outlet (PW)
• Complete a city-wide small (< 36") storm sewer
system cleaning (PW)
• Initiate construction of stormwater S1 & S2 projects
(PW)
• Complete construction of stormwater S3A & hospital-
area projects (PW)
• Complete a city-wide small (< 36”) storm sewer
system cleaning (PW)
• Televise large (> 36”) storm sewer system (PW)
• Complete Outfall System Plan Update (PW)
• Complete construction of stormwater S1 & S2
projects (PW)
• Complete a city-wide small (< 36”) storm sewer
system cleaning (PW)
• Clean large (> 36”) storm sewer system (PW)
Estimated at $33 million
for prioritized projects &
programs
5 Educate public on the importance of
building, maintaining replacing and
funding infrastructure
• Work with infrastructure-focused departments to
create educational content
• Promote in Englewood Citizen, city web site and on
social media. Publicize at events.
• Promote in Englewood Citizen, city web site and on
social media. Publicize at events. (COM)
• Promote in Englewood Citizen, city web site and
on social media. Publicize at events. (COM)
6 Repair potholes initially within 7
business days
• Complete temporary repairs of potholes with cold mix
(PW)
• Complete permanent repairs with hot mix asphalt, as
material availability allows (PW)
• Track progress on web-based pothole map (PW)
• Complete temporary repairs of potholes with cold
mix (PW)
• Complete permanent repairs with hot mix asphalt, as
material availability allows (PW)
• Track progress on web-based pothole map (PW)
• Complete temporary repairs of potholes with
cold mix (PW)
• Complete permanent repairs with hot mix
asphalt, as material availability allows (PW)
• Track progress on web-based pothole map (PW)Page 254 of 268
7 Ensure neighborhood roadways are safe
and well-maintained
• Complete corrective, preventative, and routine
maintenance in accordance with the Pavement
Management Program (PW)
• Complete corrective, preventative, and routine
maintenance in accordance with the Pavement
Management Program (PW)
• Complete corrective, preventative, and routine
maintenance in accordance with the Pavement
Management Program (PW)
Departmental Codes: COM - Communications, HR-Human Resources, PW-Public Works, PRL-Parks Recreation Library, F-Finance, CC--City Clerk's Office, CD-Community Development, P-Police, CMO-City Manager's
Office, U-Utilities, IT-Information Technology, SPWRP-S. Platte Water Renewal Partners, FM-Fire Marshal's Office, CAO-City Attorney's Office; COM-Communications
Page 255 of 268
Council
Rank
LOCAL ECONOMY 2020 2021 2022 Additional
Funds Needed
in 2021
1 Attract and retain a diversified industry mix
including retail, restaurant, manufacturing,
medical and arts
• Continue economic development program focus on
small scale/entrepreneurial business retention and
attraction through grants, training and events (CD)
• Ensure that the redevelopment agreements for
CityCenter's redevelopment incorporate a mix of land
uses (CD)
• Complete new community profile (CD)
• Partner with Communications to market
Englewood businesses by enabling them to tell their
"Englewood story" (CD)
• Identify, develop and distribute business interest
stories for distribution to local and regional media
(CD/COM)
• Continue economic development program focus
on small scale/entrepreneurial business retention
and attraction through grants, training, and events
(CD)
•Identify develop and distribute business interest
stories for distribution to local and regional media
(CD/COM)
•DDA to support goal (if authorized). (DDA)
• Continue economic development program focus
on small scale/entreprenerial business retention
and attraction through grants, training and events
(CD)
• Identify, develop and distribute business stories
for distribution to local and regional media
(CD/COM)
•DDA to support goal (if authorized). (DDA)
2 Retain and sustain local businesses • Continue economic development program
focus on small scale and entrepreneurial business
retention and attraction through grants, training and
events (CD)
• Conduct quarterly tax seminars to encourage
communication between businesses and COE Finance
(F)
• Reinstitute monthly meetings with key employers
Swedish Medical Center and Craig Hospital (CD/CMO)
• Continue economic development program
focus on small scale and entrepreneurial business
retention and attraction through grants, training
and events (CD)
• Conduct quarterly tax seminars to encourage
communication between businesses and COE
Finance (F)
• Reinstitute monthly meetings with key employers
Swedish Medical Center and Craig Hospital
(CD/CMO)
• Continue economic development program
focus on small scale/entrepreneurial
business retention and attraction through
grants, training, and events (CD)
• Conduct monthly meetings with key employers
Swedish Medical Center and Craig Hospital
(CD/CMO)
•DDA to support goal (if authorized). (DDA)
3 Hold commercial vacancy along S Broadway
to a minimum by supporting redevelopment
of aging properties and supporting new
business development in the area
• Continue to provide monthly statistical indicators
of commercial occupancy in Community
Development newsletter (CD)
• Target the Broadway corridor for investment of the
City's small business grant and training programs (CD)
• Provide the updated community profile to local and
regional commercial brokers (CD)
• Meet with property owners about why properties
are vacant (CD)
• Conduct exit interviews with companies closing or
leaving Englewood (CD)
• Designate an individual tasked with guiding a
project through the development process (i.e.: a
Development Coordinator or Ombudsman) (CD/PW)
• Investigate vacancy fees to disincentivize leaving
buildings vacant (CD/F)
• Support additional office development for larger
(25+ FTE) office tenants in the S Broadway corridor
(CD)
• Interview new businesses about success factors
that led to Englewood as their location of choice (CD)
• Continue to provide monthly statistical indicators
of commercial occupancy in Community
Development newsletter (CD)
• Target the Broadway corridor for investment of
the City's small business grant and training programs
(CD)
• Provide the updated community profile to local
and regional commercial brokers (CD)
• Meet with property owners about why properties
are vacant (CD)
• Conduct exit interviews with companies closing or
leaving Englewood (CD)
• Designate an individual tasked with guiding a
project through the development process (i.e.: a
Development Coordinator or Ombudsman) (CD/PW)
• Investigate vacancy fees to disincentivize leaving
buildings vacant (CD/F)
• Support additional office development for larger
(25+ FTE) office tenants in the S Broadway corridor
(CD)
• Interview new businesses about success factors
that led to Englewood as their location of choice
• Continue to provide monthly statistical indicators
of commercial occupancy in Community
Development newsletter (CD)
• Target the Broadway corridor for investment of
the City's small business grant and training
programs (CD)
• Provide the updated community profile to local
and regional commercial brokers (CD)
• Meet with property owners about why
properties are vacant (CD)
• Conduct exit interviews with companies closing
or leaving Englewood (CD)
• Designate an individual tasked with guiding a
project through the development process (i.e.: a
Development Coordinator or Ombudsman)
(CD/PW)
• Investigate vacancy fees to disincentivize leaving
buildings vacant (CD/F)
• Support additional office development for larger
(25+ FTE) office tenants in the S Broadway corridor
(CD)
• Interview new businesses about success factors Page 256 of 268
4 Ensure pro-business climate while
maintaining high standards for development
• Ensure that Development Reveiw Team (DRT) and
departmental review processing of development
applications is completed in accordance with City
codes and guidelines, but in a timely manner (CD)
• Initiate in-person customer feedback sessions with
economic development program clients (CD)
• Ensure that Development Review Team (DRT) and
departmental review processing of development
applications is completed in accordance with City
codes and guidelines, but in a timely manner(CD)
• Initiate in-person customer feedback sessions with
economic development program clients (CD)
• Ensure that Development Review Team (DRT)
and departmental review processing of
development applications is completed in
accordance with City codes and guidelines, but in a
timely manner (CD)
• Initiate in-person customer feedback sessions
5 Redevelop and densify CityCenter • Select a Master Developer for the City portion of
CityCenter (CD)
• Draft and approve required negotiation and
redevelopment agreements with master developer
(CD)
• Possible consideration of a new PUD application or
• Initiate first phase of redevelopment at
CityCenter (CD)
• Continue with phased redevelopment of
CityCenter (CD)
$50,000 additional in
CommDev professional
services
6 Ensure a focus on locally owned and
operated businesses
• Continue economic development program
focus on small scale and entrepreneurial business
retention and attraction through grants, training and
events (CD)
• Ensure ease in business license process, excellent
customer service and communication (F)
• Continue economic development program
focus on small scale/entrepreneurial
business retention and attraction through
grants, training, and events (CD)
•Develop a dedicated business web portal
(CD/COM)
•DDA to support goal (if authorized) (DDA)
• Continue economic development program
focus on small scale/entreprenerial
business retention and attraction through
grants, training and events (CD)
•DDA to support goal (if authorized). (DDA)
$30,000 to develop
business web portal if
consultant is required.
7 Establish a Downtown Development
Authority
• Exploration of a DDA through the Next Steps 2020
project; Potential November election (CD); Support
Community Development's exploration of a DDA
(RFPs, Contracts, Council Communication) - F
• Provide briefings to Englewood Public Schools and
Arapahoe County regarding the DDA formation
process and tax increment financing provisions and
• If authorized by district electors, the DDA is
formed, board members appointed by City Council
and operations commence (CD)
• If DDA is authorized, conduct negotiations with
the Englewood Public Schools and Arapahoe County
regarding the allocation of tax increment (DDA and
CD)
• DDA is fully operational
8 Promote business to business transactions
and shop local campaigns
• Promote local businesses in the Citizen Magazine
and on social media (COM)
• Coordinate with the Chamber and ACE to conduct
Small Business Saturday (CD)
• Identify develop and distribute business interest
stories for distribution to local and regional media
(CD/COM)
• Promote local businesses in the Citizen Magazine
and on social media. (COM)
• Coordinate with the Chamber and ACE to conduct
Small Business Saturday (CD)
•DDA to support goal (if authorized). (DDA)
• Promote local businesses in the Citizen Magazine
and on social media. (COM)
• Coordinate with the Chamber and ACE to
conduct Small Business Saturday (CD)
•DDA to support goal (if authorized). (DDA)
9 Ensure Englewood development process is
equivalent to or better than neighboring
communities
• Incorporate development review efficiency
into the goal of the Title 16 community
assessment project (CD)
• With the selected vendor, develop the new
software iMS that will replace the City's development
permitting system and enable more online
application services to be offered (IT/CD)
• Conduct regular, in-person input sessions with
customers of Planning, Building and Economic
Development services (CD)
• System will be live in first quarter 2021
(IT/CD)
• Conduct regular, in-person input sessions with
customers of Planning, Building and Economic
Development services (CD)
• Incorporate efficiencies into new Title 16
regulations and codes as part of comprehensive re-
write (CD)
•Re-evaluate the development review process for
maximum efficiencies. (CD/PW/Admin)
• System fully functional (CD)
• Conduct regular, in-person input sessions with
customers of Planning, Building and Economic
Development services (CD)
• Following adoption of the comprehensive
re-write of Title 16, conduct an assessment of the
development review process' best implementation
options for the new code (CD)
10 Attract and retain a hotel in central
Englewood
• Explore the development of a hotel with the
master developer as part of the CityCenter
redevelopment (CD)
• If proven feasible in the market and for the
master developer, initiate a hotel development at
CityCenter (CD)
• If a hotel is not feasible at City Center, explore
alternate locations in the central portion of the city
(CD)Page 257 of 268
11 Utilize job training and skills development
programs for local businesses, residents and
people experiencing homelessness
• Explore job training programs that focus on people
experiencing homelessness that may be offered by
one of Englewood's eight economic development
partners (CD)
• Explore opportunities for educational and training
institutions to locate training facilities and conduct
programs in Englewood (CD)
• Implement training programs (CD)
• Explore opportunities for educational and training
institutions to locate training facilities and conduct
programs in Englewood (CD)
• Continue training programs (CD)
• Explore opportunities for educational and
training institutions to locate training facilities and
conduct programs in Englewood (CD)
12 Ensure commercial areas, like
neighborhoods, have unique character and
pedestrian amenities for employees and
visitors
• Explore grant funding for enhanced crosswalks in
downtown (CD)
• Install initial artistic crosswalks & traffic controller
wraps in the downtown area (PW)
• Create commercial zones and districts
• Provide wayfinding and placemaking elements
such as creative crosswalks in commercial areas
(CW)
•DDA to support goal (if authorized). (DDA)
• Provide wayfinding and placemaking elements
such as creative crosswalks in commercial areas
(CW)
•DDA to support goal (if authorized). (DDA)
13 Assess development codes bi-annually and
modify as needed
• Document development code
opportunities/issues/complaints through Title 16
Community Assessment (CD)
• Incorporate code changes into Title 16
comprehensive re-write (CD)
• Establish process and timing for 2022 assessment
in 4Q 2021 (CD)
14 Celebrate economic and redevelopment
successes
• Submit projects and programs for awards
and other professional recognition
(ULI, Downtown Colorado, IEDC, etc) (CD)
• Recognize the achievements of Englewood
businesses and development projects at City Council
meetings (CD)
• Propose a mobile workshop in Englewood for the
2021 Spring Urban Land Institute (ULI) meeting in
Denver (CD) • Promote
successes on our marketing channels (COM)
• Submit projects and programs for awards
and other professional recognition
(ULI, Downtown Colorado, IEDC, etc) (CD)
• Recognize the achievements of Englewood
businesses and development projects at City Council
meetings (CD)
• Propose a mobile workshop in Englewood for the
2021 Spring Urban Land Institute (ULI) meeting in
Denver (CD) • Promote successes on our
marketing channels (COM)
• Submit projects and programs for awards and
other professional recognition (ULI, Downtown
Colorado, IEDC, etc.) (CD)
• Recognize the achievements of Englewood
businesses and development projects at City
Council meetings (CD) • Promote successes on
our marketing channels (COM)
Departmental Codes: COM - Communications, HR-Human Resources, PW-Public Works, PRL-Parks Recreation Library, F-Finance, CC--City Clerk's Office, CD-Community Development, P-Police, CMO-City Manager's
Office, U-Utilities, IT-Information Technology, SPWRP-S. Platte Water Renewal Partners, FM-Fire Marshal's Office, CAO-City Attorney's Office; COM-Communications; CW-Cheryl Wink
Page 258 of 268
Council
Rank
SAFETY 2020 2021 2022 Additional
Funds Needed
in 2021
1 Build, maintain, replace and fund a quality
stormwater drainage system
[see Infrastructure tab][see Infrastructure tab][see Infrastructure tab]
2 Provide community resiliency against
manmade and natural disasters
• Working with the Englewood Emergency
Management Coordinator, establish Emergency
Operations Steering Committee and Working Group.
Update, finalize, communicate and test the
Emergency Operations Plan by year end.
• TBD based on feedback from table top exercises and
specific training needs.
Complete and finalize COOP plans for each
department/division.
3 Ensure reduced speed in neighborhoods
and traffic calming measures where
appropriate
• The PD will work with Traffic Engineering in order to
develop a comprehensive plan for neighborhood
studies. Previous studies should also be reviewed.
• Create a Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program (PW)
• Begin implementation of the Neighborhood Traffic
Calming Program (PW)
• Increase public education via the Neighborhood
Resource employee and conduct traffic surveys and
assessments where practical (PD?)
Estimated at $200,000
per year to implement NH
Traffic Calming
4 Ensure high quality public safety services • Promote and continue to develop the partnership
with All Health and the Co-Responder Program.
Current cost for this program is $132,000.00 and it is
contained in the Police Operations Budget.
• By the end of 2020 the Code Enforcement Divisions
will have proper training, equipment and software to
utilize mobile devices in the field in order to provide a
higher level of customer service to the community.
• Code Enforcement will partner with the Parks
Department, Communications and other departments
as necessary to educate and enforce park rules with
an emphasis on animal related violations.
• Provide robust training and development for
officers to be exposed to innovations in policing.
• Develop metrics for measuring success.
• Report out to community each year on metrics.
• Investigate Police oversight board.
•Analyze and assess the strategy with All Health in
order to fill in gaps that would better serve the
community. No additional cost estimate anticipated
at this time other than ajustments to salary structure
for the two Co-Responders (cost of living).
• Provide robust training and development program
(PD)
• Develop metrics for measuring success
• Report out to community each year on metrics
• Provide robust training and development
program (PD)
• Develop metrics for measuring success
• Report out to community each year on metrics
5 Pursue zero vehicular, pedestrian, and
cyclist deaths
• Increase collaboration between the Traffic
Enforcement Team in Police and Traffic Engineers in
Public Works
• Establish a 3E (Engineering, Enforcement,
Education) Committee to address specific traffic
safety issues (PW/PD/Comm)
• Complete a Traffic Crash Analysis Report (PW)
• Utilize DRCOG Vision Zero resources
• Analyze prior year's performance and refine
approaches where necessary.
6 Develop sustainable solutions for both
humans and living things
Page 259 of 268
7 Research and implement innovative and
effective best practices used throughout
the country for both Police and Code
Enforcement
•Currently researching the implementation of the
Restorative Justice System. Current RFP will soon be
sent out in an effort to hire a subject matter expert.
•Currently working with Mayor Olson and the Tri-
Cities Group in developing an effective approach with
those experiencing homelessness.
• By the end of 2020 the Code Enforcement Divisions
will have proper training, equipment and software to
utilize mobile devices in the field in order to provide a
higher level of customer service to the community.
•Code Enforcement will partner with the Parks
Department, Communications and other departments
as necessary to educate and enforce park rules with
an emphasis on animal related violations.
• Provide robust training and development for officers
to be exposed to innovation in policing. (PD)
• Assign in innovation officer from existing staff
•If we determine that Restorative Justice is viable for
the City of Englewood then it will be implemented in
thoughtful and incremental steps.
•Continue to work with the Tri-Cities group as well as
Change the Trend in developing strategies to offset
homelessness.
• Provide robust training and development for officers
to be exposed to innovation in policing. (PD)
• Assign in innovation officer from existing staff
resources who stays abreast of best practices and
educates department
• Provide robust training and development for
officers to be exposed to innovation in policing.
(PD)
• Assign in innovation officer from existing staff
resources who stays abreast of best practices and
educates department
8 Ensure well maintained residential and
commercial properties throughout the
City
• Maintain proactive Code Enforcement activities
• Hire and utilize seasonal code officer approved in
2020 budget
• Work with Communications on items in preceding
goal
• Continue Nuisance Abatement Team for problem
properties
• Maintain proactive Code Enforcement activities
• Hire and utilize seasonal code officer approved in
2020 budget
• Work with Communications on items in preceding
goal
• Continue Nuisance Abatement Team for problem
properties
• Maintain proactive Code Enforcement activities
• Hire and utilize seasonal code officer approved in
2020 budget
• Work with Communications on items in
preceding goal
9 Ensure the built environment is
constructed in a safe manner through
CPTED (Crime Prevention Through
"
• Improve existing park layout through re-design.
(PRL)
"
• Implement improved park design through park
renovations (PRL)
Implement improved park design through
renovations (PRL)
10 Ensure widespread knowledge of property
maintenance codes for both residential
and commercial properties
• Code will work with Building Division and
Communications to develop common code
summaries
• Communications will promote summaries and a Did
• Increase the scope of public education via the
various communication opportunities that the City
possesses (COM)
Departmental Codes: HR-Human Resources, PW-Public Works, PRL-Parks Recreation Library, F-Finance, CC--City Clerk's Office, CD-Community Development, P-Police, CMO-City Manager's Office, U-Utilities, IT-
Information Technology, SPWRP-S. Platte Water Renewal Partners, FM-Fire Marshal's Office, CAO-City Attorney's Office; COM-Communications
Page 260 of 268
Council
Rank
NEIGHBORHOODS 2020 2021 2022 Additional
Funds Needed
in 2021
1 Ensure neighbors are connected to one
another
• Neighborhood Resources Coordinator work with
neighborhood group leaders to organize neighborhood
events (COM)
• Lay foundation for the Neighborhood Resources
Program (COM)
• Promote neighbor-to-neighbor programs like Snow
Buddies (COM)
• Neighborhood Resources Coordinator work with
neighborhood group leaders to organize neighborhood
events (COM)
• Neighborhood Resources Program continues to gain
registered neighborhood groups (COM)
• Promote neighbor-to-neighbor programs like Snow
Bunnies (COM)
• Create neighborhood grant program to promote
beautification, service projects, neighborhood
identification, neighborhood events, etc. (COM)
• Neighborhood Resources Coordinator work with
neighborhood group leaders to organize
neighborhood events (COM)
• Neighborhood Resources Program continues to
gain registered neighborhood groups (COM)
• Promote neighbor-to-neighbor programs like
Snow Bunnies (COM)
• Create neighborhood grant program to promote
beautification, service projects, neighborhood
identification, neighborhood events, etc.(COM)
Grant Program: $15,000
Snow Bunnie Promotion:
$2000
2 Ensure walkability • Increase Englewood's Walk Score* (CD)
• Implement a sidewalk assessment program similar to
streets to address "worst first" sidewalk areas; focus on
areas around schools and transit (COM)
• Upgrade or replace a minimum of 40 pedestrian ramps
per year to work towards compliance with the ADA
Guidelines (PW)
• Complete an assessment of all “missing” sidewalk
segments in the City (PW)
• Implement pilot project to restrict through traffic on
certain neighborhood streets to allow for more space for
pedestrians & bicyclists (PW)
• Identify location for pilot project to install curb
extensions, temporary roundabouts and other traffic
calming devices (COM)
• Upgrade or replace a minimum of 40 pedestrian
ramps per year to work towards compliance with the
ADA Guidelines (PW)
• Consider flashing light crosswalk signage (CW)
• Require green buffers between the street and the
sidewalk for safety (COM)
• Connect neighborhoods using landscape
architectural elements to create visually aesthetic
green space, and allow for physical activity (COM)
• Upgrade or replace a minimum of 40 pedestrian
ramps per year to work towards compliance with
the ADA Guidelines (PW)
• Construct prioritized missing sidewalk segments,
as funding allows (PW)
3 Ensure residents feel ownership and
connection to law enforcement/code
enforcement
• Neighborhood Resources Coordinator work with
neighbors to bring law enforecement/code enforcement
officers to neighborhood meetings to educate
neighborhood (COM)
• Neighborhood Resources Newsletter will include
positive story about law enforecement/code
• Neighborhood Resources Coordinator work with
neighbors to bring law enforecement/code
enforcement officers to neighborhood meetings to
educate neighborhood (COM)
• Neighborhood Resources Newsletter will include
positive story about law enforecement/code
• Neighborhood Resources Coordinator work with
neighbors to bring law enforecement/code
enforcement officers to neighborhood meetings to
educate neighborhood (COM)
• Neighborhood Resources Newsletter will include
positive story about law enforecement/code
4 Establish Neighborhood Resource
Program and Neighborhood Resources
Coordinator
• Hire Neighborhood Resources Coordinator (COM)
• Create workplan for years 1-3 (COM)
• Create program website and resource guide
• Establish four registered neighborhood groups (COM)
• Increase Nat'l Night Out participating neighborhoods
by 15% (COM)
• Recruit volunteers through paid advertising in Herald,
social media, etc. (COM)
• Create Neighborhood Micro Grant Program (COM)
• Establish 5 registered neighborhood groups (COM)
• Purchase travelling neighborhood party trailer (COM)
• Increase Nat'l Night Out participating neighborhoods
by 15% (COM)
• Recruit volunteers through paid advertising in
Herald, social media, etc. (COM)
• Establish 5 registered neighborhood groups
(COM)
• Increase Nat'l Night Out participating
neighborhoods by 15% (COM)
5 Ensure affordability • Continue Energy Efficiency Englewood (E3) and
implement Home Repair and Improvement (HRIP)
programs (CD)
• Continue E3 and HRIP programs (CD)• Continue E3 and HRIP programs (CD)$100,000 from Fund 46
(Housing Fund) to
continue HRIP
Page 261 of 268
6 Work to ensure residents are informed
and engaged with their local government
• Establish Neighborhood Resources Program monthly
newsletter (COM)
•Conduct the Citizens Plannning School Spring/Fall (CD)
• Neighborhood Resources Coordinator will
communicate city information with neighborhood group
leaders (COM)
• Establish Neighborhood Resources Program monthly
newsletter (COM)
Continue Citizens Planning School Spring/Fall (CD)
• Neighborhood Resources Coordinator will
communicate city information with neighborhood
group leaders (COM)
• Establish Neighborhood Resources Program
monthly newsletter (COM)
Continue Citizens Planning School Spring/Fall (CD)
• Neighborhood Resources Coordinator will
communicate city information with neighborhood
group leaders (COM)
7 Promote resident volunteerism in
neighborhoods
• Promote in Englewood Citizen, city web site and on
social media. Publicize at events. (COM)
• Encourage neighborhood groups to plan volunteer
days for their neighborhood (COM)
• Work with City departments to identify Adopt a Spot
locations for volunteers to landscape or cleanup or
provide additional volunteer opportunities
• Promote in Englewood Citizen, city web site and on
social media. Publicize at events. (COM)
• Encourage neighborhood groups to plan volunteer
days for their neighborhood (COM)
• Work with City departments to identify Adopt a Spot
locations for volunteers to landscape or cleanup or
provide additional volunteer opportunities
• Promote in Englewood Citizen, city web site and
on social media. Publicize at events. (COM)
• Encourage neighborhood groups to plan
volunteer days for their neighborhood (COM)
8 Organize neighborhoods into distinct
areas with unique identities
• Launch social media campaign (COM)
• Recruit Neighborhood Group Leaders (COM)
• Setup system for residents to draw their own map of
their neighborhood and create name suggestions (COM)
• Establish four registered neighborhoods (COM)
• Promote in Englewood Citizen, city web site and on
social media. Publicize at events. (COM)
• Recruit Neighborhood Group Leaders (COM)
• Setup system for residents to draw their own map of
their neighborhood and create name suggestions
(COM)
• Establish four registered neighborhoods (COM)
• Provide grants or other funding to create
distinguising characteristics such as street signs,
creative crosswalks neighborhood wayfinding and
• Promote in Englewood Citizen, city web site and
on social media. Publicize at events. (COM)
• Recruit Neighborhood Group Leaders (COM)
• Setup system for residents to draw their own
map of their neighborhood and create name
suggestions (COM)
• Establish four registered neighborhoods (COM)
9 Encourage diversity of people and
architecture
• Next Steps study will assess development and design
options for the central portion of the city through
supporting CityCenter redevelopment and exploration of
a downtown development authority (CD)
• Incorporate these elements in the redevelopment of
CityCenter (CD)
• Ensure inclusion of these elements in phases of
CityCenter and central area redevelopment (CD)
10 Create ad hoc design feedback boards for
design input for new construction
• Incorporate design feedback boards into Title 16
Community Assessment (CD)
• If endorsed in assessment, inlcude in comprehensive
Title 16 re-write planned for 2021 (CD)
• Continue if incorporated into Title 16 (CD) Title 16 Re-Write Outside
Legal and Consulting:
$250,000; Consultant to
Develop Design Guidelines
to Facilitate Design
Input/Review: $200,000;
and Planning/Urban
Design FTE to Administer
Design Review Program:
$95,000 (ongoing)
Departmental Codes: HR-Human Resources, PW-Public Works, PRL-Parks Recreation Library, F-Finance, CC--City Clerk's Office, CD-Community Development, P-Police, CMO-City Manager's Office, U-Utilities, IT-
Information Technology, SPWRP-S. Platte Water Renewal Partners, FM-Fire Marshal's Office, CAO-City Attorney's Office, COM - Communications
*Walk Score is a private company that provides walkability services through a website and mobile applications. Its flagship product is a large-scale, public access walkability index that assigns a numerical walkability score
to any address in the United States.Page 262 of 268
Council
Rank
SUSTAINABILITY 2020 2021 2022 Additional
Funds Needed
in 2021
1 Consider long-term sustainability in
infrastructure
• Develop financial model supporting sustainability in
infrastructure (F/PW/U/PRL)
• Evaluate financial model supporting sustainability
in infrastructure and communicate necessary
alternatives, if applicable (F/PW/U/PRL)
• Evaluate financial model supporting
sustainability in infrastructure and
communicate necessary alternatives, if
2 Maintain the current built environment and
maximize the lifecycle of newer high-profile
buildings (police station, schools)
• Develop an inventory of maintenance needs for city
buildings (PW)
• Develop a comprehensive asset management
program to ensure maintenance and replacement
planning for city buildings (PW)
• Purchase asset management
systems/additional module for facilities (PW)
$35,000 for asset
management software for
facilities
3 Develop a proactive capital plan to address
needed capital and maintenance of city
buildings
• Develop and implement comprehensive Capital
Improvement Plan (F)
• Develop and implement comprehensive Capital
Improvement Plan (F)
• Develop and implement comprehensive
Capital Improvement Plan (F)
4 Evaluate organized garbage & recycling
collection program
• Issue Request for Proposals (RFP) to waste haulers;
solicit proposals for single hauler trash & recycling
collection (PW)
• Establish citizen advisory committee (PW)
• Educate citizens & solicit input on proposed single
• If Council/residents chose a single hauler,
implement system (PW)
Implementation costs for
city-wide trash & recycling
program are unknown at
this time
5 Support pollinators, particularly in parks, and
cut the use of pesticides
• Plant flowers and plants that attract pollinators in
parks, flower beds and around golf course. Annually
25 flower beds are planted with flowers such as: Black
Eyed Susans, Penstemon, Snapdragons and Verbena
(PRL)
• Utilize organic fertilizers on athletic fields. Increase
the use of the organic fertilizer by 20% annually over
the next 5 years. (PRL)
• Research best practices in invasive species
management to reduce future use of pesticides (PRL)
• Plant flowers and plants that attract pollinators in
parks, flower beds and around golf course. Annually
25 flower beds are planted with flowers such as:
Black Eyed Susans, Penstemon, Snapdragons and
Verbena (PRL)
• Reduce the use of Glyphosate in parks and open
space transition to the use of pre-emergent
herbicides and plantings of deeper mulch beds.
(PRL)
• Utilize organic fertilizers on athletic fields. Increase
the use of the organic fertilizer by 20% annually over
the next 5 years. (PRL)
• Reduce the use of Glyphosate in parks and open
space by 25%
• Plant flowers and plants that attract
pollinators in parks, flower beds and around
golf course. Annually 25 flower beds are
planted with flowers such as: Black Eyed
Susans, Penstemon, Snapdragons and Verbena
(PRL)
• Reduce the use of Glyphosate in parks and
open space transition to the use of pre-
emergent herbicides and plantings of deeper
mulch beds. (PRL)
• Utilize organic fertilizers on athletic fields.
Increase the use of the organic fertilizer by 20%
annually over the next 5 years. (PRL)
• Reduce the use of Glyphosate in parks and
Funding to reduce the use
of glyphosate and increase
the use of less harmful
pesticides $5,000
annually.
6 Promote homeowner and business
conservation and sustainability efforts
• Create a Sustainability Office within an existing City
Department
• Develop E3 grant program for businesses in addition
to existing homeowner program
• Fund eligible, income-qualified energy
improvements to homes
• Expend 100% of eligible CDBG funds
• Consider Green Building Code from International
• Explore reducing wait list for residential E3
program by supplementing CDBG funds with
General Fund dollars to the extent allowed by
federal guidelines
7 Implement strategies that will respond to
climate variability
• Create a Sustainability Office within an existing City
Department
• Consider establishing a new Sustainability board or
commission
Sustainability Coordinator
& program funds--
$120,000 Page 263 of 268
8 Move toward a green energy grid with steps
toward energy independence
• Evaluate current energy charges for all city facilities
(PW)
• Explore and promote geothermal energy
opportunities
• Evaluate current Ameresco contract (PW)
• Work with the Colorado Energy Office to conduct
an Energy Performance Contacting Audit of all city
buildings (PW)
• Implement Energy Performance Contacting
Audit findings for all city buildings (PW)
Estimate $150,000
investment in EPC audit
findings which would likely
be refunded/paid back
over the life of the
contract
9 Invest in water infrastructure • Complete Water Master Plan; set priorities for
identified projects & programs (U)
• Complete Water Rate & Fee Study (U/F)
• Increase water rates and connection fees as needed
• As funding materializes, implement phased repair
and replacement schedule outlined in the
masterplan (U)
- Continue implementation of Master Plan
capital
projects and programs as funding allows (U)
Water and Sewer rate
increases as outlined
10 Pursue funding partnerships regionally and
nationally for water programs
• Evaluate possible grant funding opportunities (U)• Evaluate possible grant opportunities (U)• Evaluate possible grant opportunities (U)
11 Improve taste and clarity of Englewood water • Initiate construction of Big Dry Creek Diversion
project (U)
• Update & publish water quality report (U)
• Complete construction of Big Dry Creek Diversion
project (U)
- Complete water softening evaluation (U)
water softening study
funding ($50K)
12 Address aging irrigation systems in parks • Develop a plan for phased replacement of irrigation
systems in parks with efficient systems
• Solicit funds for implementation
• Implement park irrigation system repair and
replacement plan
12 Increase water conservation efforts • Develop a residential and commercial water
conservation program
• Develop strategy to eliminate remaining flat rate
billing (U/F)
- Eliminate declining rate structure for water usage
and replace with increasing rate structure (U)
• Implement water conservation program
• Undertake a water usage analysis of City facilities
(U)
- Install meters to eliminate flat rate accounts (U)
• Implement water conservation program
- Install meters to eliminate flat rate accounts
(U)
Funding for meter
installation
13 Stormwater quality • Evaluate opportunities for incorporating water
quality improvements in public infrastructure projects
(PW)
• Evaluate opportunities for incorporating water
quality improvements in public infrastructure
projects (PW)
• Evaluate opportunities for incorporating
water quality improvements in public
infrastructure projects (PW)
14 Engage in sustainable water futures that
employ water efficient systems
• Continue with Water Rights Master Plan (U)
• Complete Meadow Creek raw water line project (U)
15 Increase recycling efforts • Promote recycling initiatives and opportunities
within the metro area (PW/Comm)
• Implement a recycling program at all city facilities;
track tonnage collected (PW)
$20,000 for program
implementation
16 Increase efficiency of irrigation systems in
parks
• Replace/ repair irrigation systems in parks by replace
outdated nozzles and spray heads to increase
efficiency. Replace outdated valves and overall
irrigation systems. (PRL)
• Replace/ repair irrigation systems in parks by
replace outdated nozzles and spray heads to
increase efficiency. Replace outdated valves and
overall irrigation systems. (PRL)
• Replace/ repair irrigation systems in parks by
replace outdated nozzles and spray heads to
increase efficiency. Replace outdated valves
and overall irrigation systems. (PRL)
17 Educate the public regarding water availability,
conservation and individual responsibilities
there to
• Promote best practices in the Citizen Magazine and
on social media (Comm)
• Evaluate voluntary lawn sprinkling restrictions; issue
educational materials (U/Comm)
• Evaluate xeriscaping opportunities in public right-of-
way (U/PW)
• Promote best practices in the Citizen Magazine
and on social media. (COM)Page 264 of 268
18 Build solar gardens and encourage energy
efficient homes and businesses
• Create a Sustainability Office within an existing City
Department
• Explore City property tax incentives for solar arrays
and/or solor panels
Departmental Codes: HR-Human Resources, PW-Public Works, PRL-Parks Recreation Library, F-Finance, CC--City Clerk's Office, CD-Community Development, P-Police, CMO-City Manager's Office, U-Utilities, IT-
Information Technology, SPWRP-S. Platte Water Renewal Partners, FM-Fire Marshal's Office, CAO-City Attorney's Office; COM-Communications
Page 265 of 268
Council
Rank
TRANSPORTATION 2020 2021 2022 Additional
Funds Needed
in 2021
1 Resolve dangerous crossing areas • Identify high crash rate locations; implement
initial/quick strike initiatives to improve
safety/awareness (PW)
• Initiate design of Oxford pedestrian bridge (PW)
• Continue to identify & implement initial/quick strike
initiatives to improve safety/awareness (PW)
• Finalize design & complete construction of Oxford
pedestrian bridge (PW)
• Continue to identify & implement
initial/quick strike initiatives to improve
safety/awareness (PW)
2 Improve safety and walkability from
neighborhoods to parks and schools
• Complete Walkability Maps for three schools (PW)• Complete Walkability Maps for three
schools (PW)
3 Develop traffic calming measures to reduce
speed in neighborhoods
• Create a Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program
(PW)
• Begin implementation of the Neighborhood Traffic
Calming Program (PW)
• Continue implementation of the
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program (PW)
Estimated at $200,000
per year to implement NH
Traffic Calming
4 Improve automobile safety and travel times on
Broadway, Hamden and Belleview
• Initiate design of US 285/Broadway Interchange
Reconstruction Project (PW)
• Initiate US 285 Congestion Mitigation Study (PW)
• Complete design & begin construction of US
285/Broadway Interchange Reconstruction Project
(PW)
• Continue US 285 Congestion Mitigation Study (PW)
• Continue construction of US 285/Broadway
Interchange Reconstruction Project -
anticipated completion in 2023 (PW)
• Complete US 285 Congestion Mitigation
Study & begin to implement
recommendations, as funding allows (PW)
5 Develop a system of non-motorized trails and
paths that are safe, separated from vehicular
traffic and connect the entire city (short term:
paint bike lanes and promote protected bike
lanes)
• Construct Oxford on-street bike lanes project (PW)
• Initiate design of Oxford pedestrian bridge project
(PW)
• Construct walk-n-Wheel Plan initiatives, with
available funding (PW)
• Complete design & construction of Oxford
pedestrian bridge project (PW)
• Construct Walk-n-Wheel Plan initiatives,
with available funding (PW)
$150,000 for next project
in Walk-n-Wheel Plan
6 Develop integrated mobility systems such as bike
and pedestrian routes and trails through
partnerships with surrounding communities
• Explore potential partnering opportunities with
adjacent communities (PW/CD/PRL)
7 Increase ridership on RTD transit options in
Englewood
• Create a marketing video for Englewood's RTD
services (CD)
• Include an article regarding transportation options
in the Englewood Citizen (CD)
• Develop strong partnerships with RTD to develop a
joint strategy to increase ridership on RTD transit
modes (CD)
• If created, explore long term funding options for
the Englewood Trolley with the DDA (CD)
• Explore potential shift from scheduled
Englewood Trolley service to an on-demand
transportation service with RTD (CD)
Additional $15,000 for
trolley operations
Departmental Codes: HR-Human Resources, PW-Public Works, PRL-Parks Recreation Library, F-Finance, CC--City Clerk's Office, CD-Community Development, P-Police, CMO-City Manager's Office, U-Utilities, IT-
Information Technology, SPWRP-S. Platte Water Renewal Partners, FM-Fire Marshal's Office, CAO-City Attorney's Office; COM-Communications
Page 266 of 268
GOVERNANCE 2020 2021 2022 Additional Funds
Needed in 2021
Develop an information technology
infrastructure--including hardware,
software, people and facilities--that is
secure, resilient and adaptable to meet the
current and anticipated future needs of the
city.
• Upgrade existing network to be secure and
resilient (IT)
• Design fiber to city facilities (IT)
• Upgrade city's network to be secure and resilient
(IT)
• Implementation of Municipal Court System (IT)
• Implementation of Human Resources & Payroll
System (IT)
• Selection and implementation of permitting and
licensing system (IT)
• Implementation of Records Management System
(IT) (CC)
• Identify and document requirements for asset
management system (IT)
• Implementation/upgrade of security cameras (IT)
• Manage rebuild of new city website (COM)
• Implementaion of fiber to city facilities (IT)
• Implementation of permitting and licensing system
(IT)
• Implementation of asset management system (IT)
• Implementation/upgrade of security cams (IT)
• Launch new city website (COM)
• Implement new iCompass Board and Commission
software (currently Granicus) (CC)
• Implementation of fiber to city facilities (IT)
• Implementation/upgrade of security cameras
(IT)
• Maintain city website (COM)Page 267 of 268
July 21, 2020
Ms. Lisa Sorensen, Development Director
Cohen-Esrey Development Group
8500 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Suite 150
Merriam, KS 66202
Re: Trails at Lehow – 300 West Lehow Avenue
Dear Ms. Sorensen,
The City of Englewood supports your efforts to provide affordable housing for residents of Englewood
and the region. We consider Trails at Lehow to be consistent with this priority given it provides 75
affordable apartment homes that will serve the community with rental rates from 20% to 70% of the
area median income (AMI); with 10% of the units serving people earning 30% or less AMI and 25%
serving people earning 40% of less AMI.
The City recognizes that having safe & secure housing is the first step toward self-sufficiency and a key
component of creating vibrant neighborhoods.
We look forward to receiving your development proposal and working together with the City of
Englewood’s Community Development and other departments to make this project a reality.
Sincerely,
Mayor Olson
City of Englewood
Page 268 of 268