No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-08-06 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet Please note: If you have a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City of Englewood (303-762-2405) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed. 1000 Englewood Pkwy – Council Chambers Englewood, CO 80110 AGENDA City Council Regular Meeting Monday, August 6, 2018 ♦ 7:00 PM 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Roll Call 5. Consideration of Minutes of Previous Session 6. Recognition of Scheduled Public Comment The deadline to sign up to speak for Scheduled Public Comment is Wednesday, prior to the meeting, through the City Manager’s Office. Only those who meet the deadline can speak in this section. (This is an opportunity for the public to address City Council. There is an expectation that the presentation will be conducted in a respectful manner. Council may ask questions for clarification, but there will not be any dialogue. Please limit your presentation to five minutes.) Written materials for presentation to Council may be submitted to the City Clerk as the speaker approaches the podium. Currently the City’s computer presentation equipment is not available for general public use. (The City is working on a solution for usage of AV equipment.) a. Jason Sakry and Dagan Thomas, will address Council regarding Farmhouse Tap. b. Emily Gonzales, an Englewood resident, will address Council regarding Parks and Recreation. c. James Jordan, an Englewood resident, will address Council regarding Charter amendments. d. Kathleen Bailey, an Englewood resident, will address Council. e. Rick Cronenberger, Board President of Integrated Family Community Services, will address Council regarding the services they provide. f. Allison Taggart, Program Director of Integrated Family Community Services, will address Council regarding the services they provide. g. Gerry Allan, an Englewood resident, will address Council regarding the flood. h. Elaine Hults, an Englewood resident, will address Council. i. Vicki Hoffman, an Englewood resident, will address Council regarding flooding and long term city response. j. Doug Cohn, an Englewood resident, will address Council regarding a historic perspective of flooding in Englewood. 7. Recognition of Unscheduled Public Comment Speakers must sign up for Unscheduled Public Comment at the beginning of the meeting. (This is an opportunity for the public to address City Council. There is an expectation that the presentation will be conducted in a respectful manner. Council may ask questions for clarification, but there will not be any dialogue. Please limit your presentation to three Page 1 of 130 Englewood City Council Regular Agenda August 6, 2018 Please note: If you have a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City of Englewood (303-762-2405) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed. minutes. Time for unscheduled public comment may be limited to 45 minutes, and if limited, shall be continued to General Discussion.) Written materials for presentation to Council may be submitted to the City Clerk as the speaker approaches the podium. Currently the City’s computer presentation equipment is not available for general public use. (The City is working on a solution for usage of AV equipment.) Council Response to Public Comment. 8. Communications, Proclamations, and Appointments 9. Consent Agenda Items a. Approval of Ordinances on First Reading i. CB 18 - Romans Park Permanent Easement CB 18 - Romans Park Permanent Easement - Pdf The Parks, Recreation and Library Services Department recommends that Council approve a Bill for an Ordinance allowing a permanent easement at Romans Park for the Public Service Company of Colorado's relocation of an electrical enclosure. Staff: Open Space Manager Dave Lee ii. Ordinance for Temporary Waiver of Building Permit and Plan Review Fees CB 21 - Pdf The Community Development Department and Office of the City Manager recommend that City Council approve a Bill for an Ordinance for the temporary waiver of building permit fees and plan review fees to facilitate and encourage the community's recovery from impacts associated with the storm of July 24, 2018. Staff: Community Development Director Brad Power b. Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading. i. CB 19 - Recall Election IGA with Arapahoe County CB 19 - IGA with Arapahoe County for Recall Election - Pdf Staff recommends that Council approve an Ordinance for an Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Englewood and Arapahoe County for a Recall Election. IGA's must be approved by Ordinance in conformance with Charter Section 79. Staff: City Clerk Stephanie Carlile c. Resolutions and Motions i. Award Contract to Xybix for EPD HQ Dispatch Room Furniture Award Contract to Xybix for EPD HQ Dispatch Room Furniture - Pdf Staff recommends that City Council award, by motion, a contract with Xybix to supply and install the furniture in the dispatch room to create a high-performance work environment for the Englewood Police Headquarters’ Dispatch Room in the amount of $90,357.50. Staff: Right of Way Services Manager Larry Nimmo 10. Public Hearing Items 11. Ordinances, Resolutions and Motions Page 2 of 130 Englewood City Council Regular Agenda August 6, 2018 Please note: If you have a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City of Englewood (303-762-2405) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed. a. Approval of Ordinances on First Reading i. CB 20 - Synergy Medical Planned Unit Development CB 20 - Synergy Medical Planned Unit Development - Pdf Staff recommends Council adoption of a Bill for an Ordinance approving the Synergy Medical Planned Unit Development (PUD). Staff: Planner II Brook Bell b. Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading c. Resolutions and Motions 12. General Discussion a. Mayor's Choice b. Council Members' Choice 13. City Manager’s Report a. July 24th, 2018 Storm Response July 24th, 2018 Storm Response - Pdf City Manager Eric Keck, Public Works Director Maria D'Andrea and Utilities Director Tom Brennan will be present to discuss the City's response to the 24 July 2018 storm. The City Manager will be talking to Council about the lessons learned from the storm. The Public Works Director will be discussing the need for mitigation and the strategies surrounding the improvement of the City's storm drain infrastructure for the future. Finally, the Utilities Director will be present to discuss the Oxford storm drain failure. 14. City Attorney’s Report 15. Adjournment Page 3 of 130 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Dave Lee DEPARTMENT: Parks, Recreation & Library DATE: August 6, 2018 SUBJECT: CB 18 - Romans Park Permanent Easement DESCRIPTION: CB 18 - Romans Park Permanent Easement RECOMMENDATION: The Parks, Recreation and Library Services Department recommends that Council approve Council Bill #18 allowing a permanent easement at Romans Park for the Public Service Company of Colorado's relocation of an electrical enclosure. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Council previously approved Ordinance No. 64, Series of 2017 authorizing a grant of a switch box utility easement between the City of Englewood and Public Service Company of Colorado at Romans Park and Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1999 between the City of Englewood and Public Service Company of Colorado authorizing a grant of easement for underground electrical lines at Romans Park. SUMMARY: Public Service Company seeks to relocate on existing electrical enclosure located in Romans Park outside the current easement in order to safely access and maintain the utility. This will not have a negative impact on pedestrian access for users of the park. ANALYSIS: Public Service Company wishes to provide better safety to their crews and improve their responsiveness for repairs to their infrastructure. Earlier this year, PSCo crews were preparing to do the work of moving the east switch cabinet to the south per the October 2017 easement agreement (Council Bill No. 65, Ord. No. 64). However, the crews discovered that if the east cabinet is moved, approximately 250 customers will be without power for 10 to 12 hours. If the west cabinet is moved, only approximately 50 customers will be without power for 10 to 12 hours. PSCo wishes to have a new Ordinance created in order to impact fewer customers during the switch over and power outage. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: There are no financial implications with the approval of this easement. ALTERNATIVES: Page 4 of 130 The alternative is to keep the existing easement agreement in place (Ord. No. 64, Series of 2017) and impact approximately 250 customers. ATTACHMENTS: Council Bill #18 Ordinance for Easement Quit Claim Deed PSCO Easement and Exhibit A Romans Park Area Map Page 5 of 130 -1- * BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. ___ COUNCIL BILL NO. 18 SERIES OF 2018 INTRODUCED BY MEMBER _____ A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A GRANT OF A SWITCH BOX UTILITY EASEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO AND PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO, LOCATED IN ROMANS PARK. WHEREAS, in 1999, the Public Service Company installed electrical lines and switching boxes in Romans Park located at 1700 East Floyd Avenue to service upgraded electrical lines; WHEREAS, the current utility switch boxes are being upgraded and one will be moved to accommodate access to both boxes; WHEREAS, on November 6, 2017, Ordinance 65, Series of 2017 was passed by the Englewood City Council granting a utility easement to Public Service Company, for the relocation of the existing East switch box; WHEREAS, prior to the start of construction Public Service Company discovered that moving the East switch cabinet would affect approximately 250 customers for up to 12 hours; WHEREAS, by instead moving the West switch cabinet, a total of 50 customers would be effected for the 12 hour period; WHEREAS, Public Service has requested a new utility easement to accommodate the utility easement for the West switch box; WHEREAS, Public Service has quit claimed its interest in the utility easement granted by Ordinance 65, Series 2017 back to the City of Englewood; WHEREAS, with the passage of this Ordinance a utility easement in Parcel A that is 13 feet by 16 feet and a utility easement in Parcel B that is 3 feet by 8 feet hereby granted to Public Service Company, for the relocation of an existing switch box in Romans Park; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Page 6 of 130 -2- Section 1. The Grant of this utility easement to Public Service Company of Colorado, by the City of Englewood, Colorado, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby accepted and approved by the Englewood City Council. Section 2. The Mayor is authorized to execute and the City Clerk to attest and seal the “Public Service Company of Colorado Switch Box Utility Easement” for and on behalf of the City of Englewood, Colorado. Section 3. The Quit Claim Deed – D8059190 returning the previous easement granted to the Public Service Company to the City of Englewood is hereby accepted and approved by the Englewood City Council. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the ____ day of _________________, 2018. Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City’s official newspaper on the _____ day of _____________________, 2018. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City’s official website beginning on the ______ day of _________________ 2018. Linda Olson, Mayor ATTEST: Stephanie Carlile, City Clerk I, Stephanie Carlile, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true copy of the Bill for an Ordinance passed on first reading and published by Title as Ordinance No. _____, Series of 2018. Stephanie Carlile Page 7 of 130 §3;gig§§;Vi%Companyof mm lllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllll Rightof Way &Permits 1123 West 3rd Avenue 06/19/2°13 °3‘51 AM RDenver,Colorado80223 §;3':a':°‘:C0UnwClerk,co 1 o 1 Matt Crane,Clerk &Recorder D 1 F:$13.00 DF:$o_oo ROW Agent:R McC1ung Address:Roman’s Park Attach to Doc.No.:199227 S—T-R:35-4-68 Plat/Grid No.2 2150027/18145 QUIT CLAIM DEED PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO,a Colorado corporation,whose address is 1800 Larimer Street Denver CO 80202,for good and valuable consideration of the sum of less than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00),in hand paid,hereby sells and quitclaims to City of Englewood,1000 Englewood Pkwy,Englewood,CO 80110,real property in the City of Englewood,County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado,described as follows: A parcel of land in the SE1/4 of Section 35,Township 4‘South,Range 68 West. This deed is conveyed to release that certain easement granted to Public Service Company of Colorado on November 9,2017,recorded November 14,2017 at Reception Number D7129750,of the official records of the County of Arapahoe,State of Colorado. with all its appurtenances. This is a total release of Public Service Document Number 199227. *1’ Dated this‘?*”day of I u..._............ ,2018. PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO, a Colorado corporation Forrest Jenkins Director,Contracting &UtilityServices STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss. COUNTY OF DENVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1 1.1,,,2018,by Forrest Jenkins,Director,Contracting &Utility Services of Public ServiceCompany of Colorado,a Colorado corporation. Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission Expires: RICHARDJ.GRADY ~ NOTARYPUBLIC -I snare OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 19904001393 December,2008 version Page 8 of 130 DIVISION SWMD ROWAGENT R Larm DOC NO 199540 E LOCATION Romans Park DESCRIPTION AUTHOR M Sudbeck,PLS 38503 PLAT/GRID NO.2150027/118145 E Floyd Ave @ S Gilpin St AUTHOR ADDRESS SEH WO/JO/CREG NO.WO 12582845 Lakewood,CO 80228 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO EASEMENT The undersigned Grantor hereby acknowledges receipt of good and valuable consideration from PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO (Company),1800 Larimer Street,Suite 1100,Denver,CO 80202,in consideration of which Grantor(s)hereby grants unto said Company,its successors and assigns,a non—exc|usive easement to construct,operate,maintain,repair,and replace utility lines and all ?xtures and devices,used or useful in the operation of said lines,through,over,under,across,and along a course as said lines may be hereafter constructed in A PARCEL OF LAND,in the SE 1/4 of Section 35,Township 4 South,Range 68 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian in the City of Englewood,County of Arapahoe,State of Colorado,the easement being described as follows: See ‘‘EXHIBITA”attached hereto and made part hereof. The easements vary in width. Together with the right to enter upon said premises,to survey,construct,maintain,operate,repair,replace,control,and use said utility lines and related ?xtures and devices,and to remove objects interfering therewith,including the trimming of trees and bushes,and together with the right to use so much of the adjoining premises of Grantor during surveying,construction,maintenance,repair, removal,or replacement of said utility lines and related ?xtures and devices as may be required to permit the operation of standard utility construction or repair machinery.The Grantor reserves the right to use and occupy the easement for any purpose consistent with the rights and privileges above granted and which will not interfere with or endanger any of the said Company's facilities therein or use thereof.Such reservations by the Grantor shall in no event include the right to erect or cause to be erected any buildings or structures upon the easement granted or to locate any mobile home or trailer units thereon.In case of the permanent abandonment of the easement,all right,privilege,and interest granted shall terminate. The work of installing and maintaining said lines and ?xtures shall be done with care;the surface along the easement area and any adjoining premises used by Company shall be restored substantially to its original level and condition. Signed this day of ,2018 (Type or print name below each signature line with of?cial title if corporation,partnership,etc.): GRANTOR:CITY OF ENGLEWOOD BY: (print name) ITS: STATE OF COLORADO,) )ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by[Grantor name(s)from above]: day of ,2018 Witness my hand and of?cial seal. My commission Expires Notary Public 1 4/27/2018 Page 9 of 130 Sheet 1 of 2 EXHIBITA —ROMANS PARK PERMANENTEASEMENT -PARCELS A &B Two parcels of land,Parcel A and Parcel B,lying in the southeast one-quarter (SE1/4)of Section 35,Township 4South,Range 68 West,of the 6th Principal Meridian,County of Arapahoe,State of Colorado,lying in Romans Park, described as follows: PARCEL A Beginning on the south line of that 8 foot wide PSCo Easement described in Reception Number A9090930,Arapahoe County Records,from which the northwest corner of the south one-half of the southeast one—quarter (S1/2 SE1/4)of said Section 35 bears N83°45’52”W,355.67 feet; thence east 13 feet,along said south line; thence south 16 feet,along a line that lies 13 feet east of and parallel with the east line of that 10 foot wide PSCo Easement described in said Reception Number A9090930; thence west 13 feet,along a line that lies 16 feet south of and parallel with said south line,to said east line; thence north 16 feet,along said east line,to the Point of Beginning. Parcel A contains 208 square feet more or less. PARCEL B Beginning at the northeast corner of said 8 foot wide PSCo Easement,from which said northwest corner of the south one-half of the southeast one—quarter (S1/2 SE1/4)bears N85°16’11”W,371.83 feet; thence east 3 feet,along the south line of Floyd Avenue; thence south 8 feet,along a line that lies 3 feet east of and parallel with the east line of said 8 foot wide PSCo Easement; thence west 3 feet,to said east line; thence north 8 feet,along said east line,to the Point of Beginning. Parcel B contains 24 square feet more or less. As shown and described on Exhibit A,Sheet 2 of 2 attached hereto and made a part hereof. The author of this description is Monte L.Sudbeck,PLS 38503,prepared on behalf of SEH lnc.,12640 West Cedar Drive,Suite F,Lakewood,CO 80228,on April 23,2018,under Job No.145846-2.0,for Public Service Company of Colorado,and is not to be construed as representing a monumented land survey. P:\PT\P\PSCOC\140287\24.0 Romans Park\9-survey\93-doc\15—proposed-desc\Parce|A -Romans Park.docx 12640 West Cedar Drive,Suite F,Lakewood,CO 80228 SEH is an equal opportunity employer |www.sehinc.com [303.586.5800 1 303.586.5801 fax Page 10 of 130 P:\F'T\P\PSCOC\140287\24.0Romans Park\9-survey\92-CAD\10—C3d\FloydAve.dwg NW COR,S1/2 SE1/4 N ‘%& ?k O 1”=4o’ I XII A I PERMANENTEASEMENT —PARCELS A&B REBAR -SW COR,BLOCK 2 SGILPINST N LINE,S1/2 SE1/4,SEC.35 8'X30'PSCO ESMT (REC.NO.A9090930) POINT OF BEGINNING,PARCEL B NE COR,8'X30‘ESMT. REC.NO.A909093O PARCEL B POINT OF BEGINNING,PARCELA 24 35-IWL INTERSECTIONOF S LINE,8'X30‘ESMT I&E LINE,10'ESMT REC.NO.A9090930 PARCEL A 208 S.F.M/L SE1/4, SEC.35, ROMANS PARK T48’RBSW 10'PSCO ESM T ( R E C . NO.A9090930) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 40 feet 12640 West Cedar Drive Suite F Lakewood,Colorado 80228 FAX:303—586-5801 www.sehinc.com Phone:303-586-5800 SHEET2OF2 llNECOR,s1/2 SE1/4 Page 11 of 130 ELELELELELELELEL12640 West Cedar Drive Suite F Lakewood, Colorado 80228 www.sehinc.com Phone: 303-586-5800 FAX: 303-586-5801 P:\PT\P\PSCOC\140287\24.0 Romans Park\9-survey\92-CAD\10-C3d\Floyd Ave.dwgFLOYD AVE.10' PSCO ESMT (REC. NO. A9090930)8'X30' PSCO ESMT (REC. NO. A9090930) ASPHAL T CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED 3'X8' PSCO ESMTGILPIN STROMANS PARK PROPOSED 13'X16' PSCO ESMT Page 12 of 130 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Brad Power DEPARTMENT: Community Development DATE: August 6, 2018 SUBJECT: Ordinance for Temporary Waiver of Building Permit and Plan Review Fees DESCRIPTION: Ordinance for Temporary Waiver of Building Permit and Plan Review Fees RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department and Office of the City Manager recommend that City Council adopt an ordinance for the temporary waiver of building permit fees and plan review fees to facilitate and encourage the community's recovery from impacts associated with the storm of July 24, 2018. SUMMARY: On July 24, 2018 the City of Englewood experienced a severe weather event that resulted in flooding of residential, commercial and public properties. In order to encourage the timely and sound repair of properties, the proposed ordinance will waive building, electrical, mechanical and plumbing permit fees for repairs and renovations that are attributable to flooding from the July 24, 2018 storm. Fees associated with required plan reviews will also be waived. The waiver period for permits will be from July 25, 2018 to October 15, 2018, and plan review waivers will extend until November 1, 2018. ANALYSIS: The interests of property owners and the community as a whole will be best served during flooding recovery efforts if properties are repaired in an expedited manner and according to City of Englewood codes, ordinances and regulations. Through the waiver of fees, property owners will be encouraged to secure required permits and ensure that work is completed in a manner that fulfills code requirements. Securing permits will also ensure that work is completed by licensed contractors (where required). If the ordinance is approved at first reading on August 6, 2018 and second reading on August 20, 2018, the fee waivers will be effective 30 days later, on September 22, 2018. In the meantime, the Building Division of the Community Development Department will accept fee waiver applications and will process permits and plan reviews for flood-related applications without requiring fee payment. If the ordinance is not adopted at first reading or at second reading, fees will retroactively be collected for any permits that have been issued. Applicants will be required to acknowledge that possibility as permits continue to be issued starting July 25, 2018 to August 6, 2018 (first reading date) or August 20, 2018 (second reading date). This action will enable the city to encourage properly permitted work over the course of the next 30 days, when flood-related permit activity is expected to peak. Page 13 of 130 The permit fee waivers will also encourage property owners to work with licensed contractors and service providers, rather than unscrupulous and fraudulent contractors who typically arrive in communities and prey upon consumers following storm events and other natural disasters. The waiver of building permit and plan review fees is an action the City of Englewood may offer to facilitate the recovery of impacted properties as quickly as possible. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: The staff time associated with the waiver of the building permit fees and plan review fees will be incorporated into the Community Development Department's 2018 department budget. It is anticipated that all work associated with flood recovery building permit processing will be completed through regular staff time. Overtime expenses are expected to be minimal. Staff will provide City Council with a summary report of the total value of permit and plan review fees that were waived after November 1, 2018. ALTERNATIVES: Do not waive building permit and plan review fees for properties impacted by the July 24, 2018 weather event. CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that City Council approve the ordinance. Page 14 of 130 1 BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. ____ SERIES OF 2018 COUNCIL BILL NO. 21 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER _______________ A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A TEMPORARY WAIVER OF BUILDING PERMIT FEES AND PLAN REVIEW FEES ESTABLISHED BY THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, On July 24, 2018, the City of Englewood experienced a severe weather event of significant flooding and flash flooding resulting in flood related damage to residential properties, commercial properties, and public properties; WHEREAS, Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Englewood Municipal Code adopts the following Construction and Safety Codes: International Building Code (Title 8-2A-1), International Mechanical Code (Title 8-2B-1), International Plumbing Code (Title 8-2C-1), National Electrical Code (Title 8-2D-1), International Fire Code (Title 8-2E-1), International Property Maintenance Code (Title 8-2F-1), International Residential Building Code (Title 8-2G-1), International Fuel Gas Code (Title 8-2H-1), and International Existing Building Code (Title 8-2J-1); WHEREAS, The Construction and Safety Codes of the City of Englewood provide that any owner or owner’s authorized agent who intends to construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, demolish or change the occupancy of a building or structure, or to erect, install, enlarge, alter, repair, remove, convert or replace any electrical, gas, mechanical or plumbing system, or to cause any such work to be performed, must first obtain the requisite permit from the City of Englewood (see International Building Code (§105), International Residential Building Code (§105), and International Existing Building Code (§105); WHEREAS, The fees associated with Construction and Safety Code permits and plan reviews are set forth by Resolution of the Governing Body; and WHEREAS, It is in the interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the City at large to encourage expedited repairs to the flood damaged area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes waiver of building, electrical, mechanical and plumbing permit fees to repair and renovate residential, commercial, and public structures damaged by the flooding that occurred on July 24, Page 15 of 130 2 2018, and any fees arising from plan reviews associated with such permitted repair and renovation projects. Section 2. The Chief Building Official shall establish a permit and plan review fee waiver form (waiver) that any owner or owner’s agent shall complete and submit at the time of submission of a permit application or plan review. Such waiver, and any supplemental documentation deemed necessary, shall provide information verifying that the permit, or plan review, is being obtained in association with the repair and renovation of structures damaged by the flooding that occurred on July 24, 2018. Section 3. The waiver of fees shall apply to permits applied for between July 25, 2018 and October 15, 2018, and associated plan reviews occurring before November 1, 2018. Section 4. Nothing herein shall be interpreted or construed as a waiver of the requirement to obtain all permits and plan reviews mandated by the Construction and Safety Codes and the Unified Development Code adopted by the City of Englewood. Section 5. Notice of general provisions applicable to interpretation and application of this Ordinance: Applicability of Title 1, Chapter 2, Saving Clause. The provisions of Title 1, Chapter 2, Saving Clause apply to interpretation and application of this Ordinance, unless otherwise set forth above, including, but not limited to, the provisions regarding severability, inconsistent ordinances or code provisions, effect of repeal or modification, and legislation not affected by repeal. Safety Clauses. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Englewood, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public, and that this Ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be obtained. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 6th day of August, 2018. Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City’s official newspaper on the 9th day of August, 2018. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City’s official website beginning on the 8th day of August, 2018 for thirty (30) days. Linda Olson, Mayor Page 16 of 130 3 ATTEST: _________________________________ Stephanie Carlile, City Clerk I, Stephanie Carlile, Acting City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 6th day of August, 2018. Stephanie Carlile Page 17 of 130 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Stephanie Carlile DEPARTMENT: City Clerk's Office DATE: August 6, 2018 SUBJECT: CB 19 - Recall Election IGA with Arapahoe County DESCRIPTION: CB 19 - Recall Election IGA with Arapahoe County RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council approve an Ordinance for an Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Englewood and Arapahoe County for a Recall Election. IGA's must be approved by Ordinance in conformance with Charter Section 79. SUMMARY: A recall petition was filed with the City Clerk's office on July 3, 2018 and has been deemed sufficient. Upon approval by Council to set a date for the recall election, the City Clerk's office will conduct the recall election in conformance with Englewood Charter, State law, and best financial practices. The City Clerk's office has sought the cooperation of Arapahoe County to provide specific election services, including, but not limited to: • providing a list of registered voters eligible to vote in the special election • contracting with a vendor to print and send mail ballot packets to every active registered voter eligible to vote in the recall election • mail packets to all active overseas and military voters eligible to vote in the recall election • provide empty ballot storage containers, numbered seals, tabletop voting booths, 24 hour box keys • conduct and oversee the process to open, scan and tabulate ballots, including providing the necessary equipment, adequately trained personnel, and secure facility, and report unofficial and official election results after tabulating all ballots. ANALYSIS: Arapahoe County has agreed to provide limited, specific services for the recall election. While Arapahoe County will not conduct, supervise or oversee the recall election, utilizing the resources of Arapahoe County is the most fiscally prudent manner to carry out the recall election. The purpose of the Intergovernmental Agreement is to define the relationship between Arapahoe County and the City of Englewood concerning the specific services to be provided by Arapahoe County for a recall election. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Page 18 of 130 Utilizing the established resources of Arapahoe County provides the most fiscally prudent manner to carry out the recall election. The cost estimate attached is specifically for the limited services we are contracting with Arapahoe County. There will be other election expenses accrued for services not provided by Arapahoe County (Election Judge salary/expenses, Advertising/Noticing, Election Supplies/Forms, Scanning equipment, ballot security, and staff overtime). ATTACHMENTS: Bill for an Ordinance (Council Bill #19) IGA Cost Estimate Page 19 of 130 1 BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. ___ COUNCIL BILL NO. 19 SERIES OF 2018 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER MARTINEZ AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ARAPAHOE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, ALLOWING ARAPAHOE COUNTY TO ASSIST IN CONDUCTING A SPECIAL ELECTION ON SEPTEMBER 18, 2018. WHEREAS, On July 16, 2018, the City Council passed a Resolution establishing September 18, 2018 as the date for a Special Election for the voters of City Council District 3 to determine whether Laurett Barrentine shall be recalled from the office of City Council Member representing District 3; WHEREAS, Arapahoe County and the City of Englewood have determined that it is in the best interest of the taxpayers and the electors for Arapahoe County to assist in conducting a special election for the City of Englewood on September 18, 2018; WHEREAS, Arapahoe County and the City of Englewood desire to set forth their respective responsibilities for the carrying out the Special Election within an Intergovernmental Agreement; WHEREAS, an Intergovernmental Agreement must be adopted by ordinance; and WHEREAS, the parties agree that the adopting ordinance shall further authorize the election official for the City of Englewood to execute this Agreement, and carry out the terms of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. The “Intergovernmental Agreement between Arapahoe County Clerk and Recorder and City of Englewood Arapahoe County to assist in conducting a Special Election on September 18, 2018” including its Attachment A – Cost Estimate, is attached hereto as “Exhibit A”. Section 2. The Intergovernmental Agreement for Special Election assistance is hereby accepted and approved by the Englewood City Council. Page 20 of 130 2 Section 3. The City’s designated election official shall be the City Clerk, who is hereby authorized to sign said Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Englewood, and take such actions as are necessary to fulfill the terms of the Agreement. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 16th day of July, 2018. Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City’s official newspaper on the 19th day of July, 2018. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City’s official website beginning on the 18th day of July, 2018. Read by Title and passed on final reading on the 6th day of August, 2018. Published by Title in the City’s official newspaper as Ordinance No. , Series of 2018, on the 9th day of August, 2018. Published by title on the City’s official website beginning on the 8th day of August, 2018 for thirty (30) days. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after publication following final passage. Linda Olson, Mayor ATTEST: Stephanie Carlile, City Clerk Linda Olson, Mayor ATTEST: Stephanie Carlile, City Clerk I, Stephanie Carlile, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by Title as Ordinance No. ___, Series of 2018. Stephanie Carlile Page 21 of 130 Page 1 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT is made by and between the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado, on behalf of the Arapahoe County Clerk and Recorder (hereinafter referred to as the "County" or “Arapahoe County” and City of Englewood (hereinafter referred to as the “City" or “City of Englewood”) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties”); and WHEREAS, the City of Englewood is conducting a mail ballot municipal recall election on September 18, 2018 pursuant to Colorado Revised Statutes Article 31, Titles 4 and 9, and the City of Englewood Home Rule Charter. The recall election is being supervised and conducted by the City of Englewood and the designated election official will be the Englewood City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the City of Englewood has requested Arapahoe County to provide specific services and assistance during its recall election; and WHEREAS, Arapahoe County has agreed to provide the specific election services requested as outlined below but is not otherwise conducting, participating in or ensuring the overall conduct of the City’s recall election; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Colorado Constitution, Article XIV, Section 18 and C.R.S. § 29-1-203, Arapahoe County and the City of Englewood have the legal authority to contract with each other to provide any function, service, or facility lawfully authorized to each, and any such contract may provide for the payment of costs, or other matters, for the purposes stated hereinafter. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises, performances, payments, and other things of value given, and under authority of C.R.S. § 29-1-203, the Parties hereto agree as follows: SECTION I. PURPOSE AND GENERAL MATTERS 1.01 The purpose of this Intergovernmental Agreement is to define the relationship between Arapahoe County and the City of Englewood concerning the specific services to be provided by Arapahoe County for the City’s mail ballot recall election to be held on September 18, 2018. 1.02 The parties agree that Arapahoe County will not conduct, supervise or oversee the recall election, which will be conducted by the City of Englewood directly, with the City Clerk as the designated election official. SECTION II. SCOPE OF SERVICES AND OBLIGATIONS 2.01 ARAPAHOE COUNTY SERVICES. The County shall provide the following services: Page 22 of 130 Page 2 A. Upon receipt of request, but no later than August 19, 2018 (30 days prior to the election), the County will send to the City via secure FTP transfer a certified list of registered voters eligible to vote in the recall election. No later than August 29, 2018 (20 days prior to the election), the County will send to the City a supplemental list of the names of eligible electors who registered to vote on or before twenty-two days before the election whose names were not included on the preliminary list. B. Upon receipt of the certified ballot content and return envelope self-affirmation language from the City in electronic format, the County will provide the text layout of the official ballot and return envelope using the City’s certified content. The County will provide an electronic proof of the ballot and return envelope to the City’s designated election official via email for written approval prior to final production. C. Conduct a logic and accuracy test on or before September 6, 2018 to verify the accuracy of the electronic vote tabulation equipment. A logic and accuracy test is a test of all tabulation equipment to test ballots by processing a pre-audited group of ballots to ensure the accuracy of the tabulation system and equipment. D. Contract with a vendor to print and send mail ballot packets to every active registered voter eligible to vote in the City’s recall election. The mail ballot packet means the packet of information provided by the City’s designated election official to eligible electors in the election. The packet shall contain the ballot, instructions for completing the ballot, a secrecy envelope, and a return envelope. E. Mail ballot packets will be mailed to all active registered overseas and military voters who are eligible to vote in the recall election on August 4, 2018 and to all other active registered voters who are eligible to vote in the recall election no sooner than August 27, 2018 and no later than September 3, 2018. F. Provide additional mail ballot packets to the City to be made available at the Englewood Clerk’s Office for eligible electors who request a ballot. G. Provide empty ballot storage containers, numbered seals, tabletop voting booths, set of 24-hour box keys, and “I Voted” stickers. a. The 24-hour box keys will be for the ballot return box located at Englewood Civic Center, 1000 Englewood Pkwy., Englewood, CO 80110. H. Upon receipt of the ballots from the City on September 18, 2018, conduct and oversee the process to open, scan, and tabulate ballots, including providing the necessary equipment, adequately trained personnel, and secure facility to accomplish this task. I. Provide to the City on or about September 18, 2018, the unofficial election results and reports at the conclusion of the tabulation of all ballots. J. Conduct a recount of the ballots cast if requested by the City for any reason. The cost of the recount will be an additional charge to the City. K. Official results will be provided on or about September 26, 2018 and all ballots and election materials will be returned to the City’s designated election official. Page 23 of 130 Page 3 L. Keep a careful and accurate accounting of time, supplies, printing costs and salaries attributable to the County’s assistance and services provided for the recall election. M. Submit to the City an itemized invoice for all expenses incurred under this Intergovernmental Agreement. 2.02 CITY OF ENGLEWOOD OBLIGATIONS. The City agrees to the following obligations: A. Determine the title and text of the ballot content and return envelope self-affirmation language. B. Submit the City’s certified ballot content, verbatim, as it should appear on the ballot and return envelope to the County. Submit the ballot and return envelope content via email to chenage@arapahoegov.com on or before July 20, 2018. Format the ballot and return envelope content in a Microsoft Word document in plain text; do not include bold, italic, underline, bullets, tables, strikethrough or indentation. C. Within one business day of receipt from the County, the City will proofread the layout and the text of the official ballot and provide written notice of acceptance to the County via email to chenage@arapahoegov.com. D. Upon receipt of a returned ballot, determine if the ballot qualifies and is otherwise valid to be counted and tabulated. Conduct verification of signatures for each qualified ballot. E. On September 18, 2018, deliver to the Arapahoe County Election Warehouse, 5251 S. Federal Blvd., Littleton, CO 80123, the initial batch of returned and qualified mail ballot envelopes for opening, scanning and tabulating. On September 26, 2018, deliver to the Arapahoe County Election Warehouse the final batch of returned mail ballot envelopes that are qualified to be counted and tabulated as part of the recall election results. F. Respond to all correspondence and calls for any matters pertaining to the County’s services to be provided concerning the City’s recall election. G. Notify the County whether a recount is required or desired. The City shall reimburse the County for the full cost of the recount. H. Remit to the County the total payment for the all election services and expenses provided under this Intergovernmental Agreement within sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of an invoice from the County. SECTION III. TERMINATION OF SERVICES 3.01 In the event that the City resolves not to hold the recall election, notice of such resolution shall be provided to the County immediately. The City shall be liable for the full actual costs of the activities Page 24 of 130 Page 4 of and services provided by the County relating to the election incurred before receipt of such notice and activities of the County relating to cancelling the election after the receipt of such notice. 3.02 Arapahoe County and the City of Englewood shall each have the right to terminate this Intergovernmental Agreement at any time and for any reason, with or without cause, by giving written notice to the other party of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, provided however that the City shall be liable for the full actual costs of the activities of and services provided by the County relating to the election incurred before issuance of a termination notice. SECTION IV. MISCELLANEOUS 4.01 NOTICES. Any and all notices required to be given by this Agreement are deemed to have been received and to be effective: (1) three days after they have been mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested; (2) immediately upon hand delivery; or (3) immediately upon receipt of confirmation that an email or fax was received; to the address of a Party as set forth below or to such Party or addresses as may hereafter be designated in writing: To County: Todd Davidson Arapahoe County Clerk and Recorder’s Office Elections Division 5334 S. Prince St. Littleton, Colorado 80120 Fax: (303) 734-5346 Email: tdavidson@arapahoegov.com To Jurisdiction: Stephanie Carlile City of Englewood City Clerk 1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, CO 80110 Fax: 303-783-6896 Email: scarlile@englewoodco.gov 4.02 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. The City agrees to waive any rights it maintains against Arapahoe County and its officials, agents and employees and to release Arapahoe County and its officials, agents and employees from any and all liability, claims, demands or actions or causes of action whatsoever that it now has or may hereinafter have arising out of, resulting from, or relating to the services provided pursuant to this Intergovernmental Agreement. In no event shall Arapahoe County be liable to the City, or any other person, for any consequential, incidental, direct, indirect, recall and/or punitive damages or any other damages arising out of this Intergovernmental Agreement or in any way relating to the services provided. Page 25 of 130 Page 5 4.03 TERM OF AGREEMENT. This Intergovernmental Agreement shall commence upon execution and shall continue until all services and obligations set forth concerning the City of Englewood’s recall election have been satisfied and concluded. 4.04 AMENDMENT. This Agreement may be amended only in writing, and following the same formality as the execution of the initial Agreement. 4.05 INTEGRATION. The Parties acknowledge that this Agreement constitutes the sole and entire Agreement between them relating to the subject matter hereof and that no Party is relying upon any oral representation made by another Party or employee, agent or officer of that Party. 4.06 TIME OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence for this Agreement. Failure to comply with the terms of this Agreement and/or the deadlines in Attachment B may result in termination of this Agreement. 4.07 GOOD FAITH. The parties shall implement this Agreement in good faith, including acting in good faith in all matters. 4.08 NO WAIVER OF GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY ACT. The Parties understand and agree that the County, its commissioners, officials, officers, directors, agents, and employees, are relying on, and do not waive or intend to waive by any provisions of this Agreement, the monetary limitations or any other rights, immunities, protections or defenses provided by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act (the “CGIA”), §§ 24-10-101 to 120, C.R.S., or otherwise available to the County or the City. To the extent the CGIA imposes varying obligations or contains different waivers for cities and counties, both the City and the County agree that they will remain liable for their independent obligations under the CGIA, and neither party shall be the agent of the other or liable for the obligations of the other. 4.09 NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. The enforcement of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all rights of action relating to such enforcement shall be strictly reserved to the County and the City, and nothing contained in this Agreement shall give or allow any such claim or right of action by any other or third person under such Agreement. Page 26 of 130 Page 6 4.10 GOVERNING LAW: JURISDICTION AND VENUE. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, this Agreement and the interpretation thereof shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado. Venue for any and all legal actions arising under this Intergovernmental Agreement shall lie in the District Court in and for the County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado. 4.11 SEVERABILITY. Should any provision of this Agreement be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or otherwise null and void, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall be of full force and effect. 4.12 ATTACHMENTS. The following attachments are incorporated herein by this reference. Attachment A - Cost Estimate Attachment B – Election Deadlines END OF PAGE Page 27 of 130 Page 7 Arapahoe County _______________________________________ _____________________ Matt Crane Date Clerk and Recorder City of Englewood _______________________________________ _____________________ Stephanie Carlile, Designated Election Official Date City Clerk Page 28 of 130 Jurisdiction's Share of Total Election Costs Based On: Total Jurisdiction Active Registered Voters 5,300 Election Expenses Incurred for2018 Special Election Total Cost Mail Ballot Processing Costs Total Cost Ballot Processing Election Judge salaries 250.00$ Mail ballot processing computers/laptops -$ Ballotsecurity teams fleet vehicle rental costs -$ Ballot processing location rental fees & utilities -$ Communications/network -$ Ballot processing set up support (technical, equipment)-$ Travel to Ballot Vendor for ballot inspection -$ UOCAVA email vendor/ballot processing -$ Total 250.00$ Other costs attributable to Admin/VSPC's/Mail Ballot Processing Total Cost Cell phone use/stipend -$ Mileage/parking reimbursement -$ Supplies (signage, seals, pens, forms, etc.)15.00$ Transfer cases (tubs) and portable ballot boxes -$ Security costs/video surveillance (not drop-box)-$ Security personnel costs -$ CBI background checks for Election Judges/temp staff -$ Drug tests for Election Judges/temp staff -$ Total 15.00$ Ballot Printing, Programming & Insertion Total Cost Ballot printing (mail, provisional, test ballots)1,800.00$ Shipping/freight 200.00$ ATTACHMENT A - COST ESTIMATE City of Englewood RECALL ELECTION Page 29 of 130 Outgoing/return envelopes and secrecy sleeves 4,600.00$ Voter instructions 450.00$ Provisional ballot affidavits and envelopes -$ UOCAVA envelopes -$ Ballot insertion and mailing fees 1,300.00$ Ballot tracking application Total 8,350.00$ Postage Total Cost Mail ballots - initial mailing 2,500.00$ Daily/supplemental ballot mailing -$ Cure/rejection letters -$ 8 Day letter -$ Mailing ballots to other counties -$ Undeliverable ballots -$ TABOR Notice Postage -$ Total 2,500.00$ Election Notices Total Cost Statutory Notice of Election -$ Ballot issue notice (TABOR) - printing & production -$ Total -$ Total Election Expense 11,115.00$ Page 30 of 130 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Larry Nimmo DEPARTMENT: Public Works DATE: August 6, 2018 SUBJECT: Award Contract to Xybix for EPD HQ Dispatch Room Furniture DESCRIPTION: Award Contract to Xybix for EPD HQ Dispatch Room Furniture RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council award, by motion, a contract with Xybix to supply and install the furniture in the dispatch room to create a high-performance work environment for the Englewood Police Headquarters’ Dispatch Room in the amount of $90,357.50. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Council approved an ordinance setting forth the ballot language and submitting to a vote of the registered electors a General Obligation Bond (GOB) for the construction of a new Englewood Police Department Headquarters. Ballot issue 2C was passed by the voters on November 8, 2016. Council approved Ordinance No. 30, Series 2017 approving the issuance of General Obligation Bonds on May 4, 2017. Staff provided project updates at several study sessions in 2017 and 2018 that informed Council of this purchase. SUMMARY: The Arapahoe County E911 standard of equipment for dispatch workstations is Xybix and each Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) is currently outfitted with their products. After the initial purchase of 6 stations, any supplemental furniture requests would be made using E911 funds. The Authority Board has awarded a standing RFP to Xybix that would provide compatibility with the existing furniture and the new furniture purchased for dispatch workstations. ANALYSIS: There are several options for specific dispatch workstations and the choice is to continue with Xybix because they are the current vendor of the dispatch workstations deployed in the center. They are a Colorado based company that is able to provide same day customer service should an issue arise. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: The Xybix proposal to furnish and install furniture for the dispatch room is budgeted under Item 30, the Furniture Fixtures and Equipment (FFE) portion with a total of $1,354,688, as of July 6, 2018. Items listed in this portion of the budget include the Furniture (this contract is budgeted at Page 31 of 130 $90,357.50) along with IT/AV systems, Security Systems, Interior signage, and Gym Equipment, all of which will be presented to City Council for approval. Item Contractor Original Budget Reallocations Current Budget Contract Amounts Available Funding Office Furniture OfficeScapes $845,070.00 $ (111,308.00) $733,762.00 $643,404.13 $90,357.87 Dispatch Room Furniture Xybix $90,357.50 $- IT/AV Systems & Equipment $269,275.00 $- $269,275.00 $- $269,275.00 Security Systems $136,703.00 $125,000.00 $261,703.00 $- $261,703.00 Interior Signage $30,000.00 $- $30,000.00 $- $30,000.00 Gym Equipment $- $59,948.00 $59,948.00 $- $59,948.00 Total $1,281,048.00 $73,640.00 $1,354,688.00 $ 733,761.93 $711,283.87 ATTACHMENTS: Contract Approval Summary Contract CFS18-33 and Schedule A Statement of Work HGAC/Interlocal Contract for Cooperative Purchasing Overall Project Budget Certificate of Insurance Page 32 of 130 Contract Approval Summary V10/25/2017 Page | 1 Contact Identification Information (to be completed by the City Clerk) ID number: Authorizing Resolution/Ordinance: Recording Information: City Contact Information Staff Contact Person: Larry G Nimmo Phone: 303-762-2504 Title: ROW Services Manager Email: lnimmo@englewoodco.gov Vendor Contact Information Vendor Name: Xybix Systems Inc. Vendor Contact: Kelley Smith Vendor Address: 8207 South Park Cir. Vendor Phone: 720-217-1753 City: Littleton Vendor Email:kelleys@xybix.com State: CO Zip Code: 80120 Contract Type Contract Type :Contractural Services Description of ‘Other’ Contract Type: Description of Contract Work/Services: Attachments: ☒Contract -- ☐Original ☒Copy ☐Addendum(s) ☐Exhibit(s) ☒Certificate of Insurance Summary of Terms: Start Date: June 26, 2018 End Date: June 26, 2019 Total Years of Term:1 Total Amount of Contract for term (or estimated amount if based on item pricing): $ 90,357.50 If Amended: Original Amount $ Amendment Amount $ Total as Amended: $ Renewal options available: Payment terms (please describe terms or attach schedule if based on deliverables): 50% Deposit, 40% Net 30, and 10% upon completion. Attachments: ☐Copy of original Contract if this is an amendment ☒Copies of related Contracts/Conveyances/Documents Design, manufacture, installation and warranty services for EPD dispatch center furniture. Page 33 of 130 Contract Approval Summary V10/25/2017 Page | 2 Source of funds: Budgeted Funds: $ 90,357.50 Line Item Description: Police Building Furn., Fixt., and Equip Line Item Total Funding: $ 733,762.00 Portion of Line Item spent to date: $ 643,404.13 Funding Source: Fund:34-1101 Division Code:004 Note (if needed): Program: Attachments: ☐Copy of budget page from current budget book if contract value $25,000 or over or requires Council approval. Process for Choosing Vendor: ☐Bid: ☐ Bid Evaluation Summary attached ☐ Bid Response of proposed awardee ☐RFP: ☐ RFP Evaluation Summary attached ☐ RFP Response of proposed awardee ☐Quotes: Copy of Quotes attached ☐Sole Source: Explain Need below ☒Other: Please describe Purchase will be completed under the Arapahoe County Master Agreement/Interlocal Contract for Cooperative Purchasing Page 34 of 130 Page 35 of 130 X X X Page 36 of 130 Page 37 of 130 Page 38 of 130 Page 39 of 130 Page 40 of 130 Page 41 of 130 Page 42 of 130 Page 43 of 130 Page 44 of 130 Page 45 of 130 Page 46 of 130 Page 47 of 130 Page 48 of 130 Page 49 of 130 A My INTERLOCALCONTRACTFOR 681 mm rucuxmaamnuu - l’erm;in::nl Numberassigned by l l~(iAC THIS INTERLOCALCONTRACT(“Contract”),made and enteredinto pursuantto the Texas InterlocalCooperationAct, Chapter 791,Texas Government Code (the “Act”),by and between the Houston-GalvestonArea Council,hereina?erreferred to as “H-GAC,”having itsprincipalplace of business at 3555 Timmons Lane,Suite 120,Houston,Texas 77027,and City of Englewood,a local government,a state agency,or a non-profitcorporationcreatedand operatedto provideone or more governmental?mctions and services,hereinafterreferredto as “End User,”having its principalplace of businessat 3615 S. Elati Street Englewood,CO 80110. WITNESSETH WHEREAS,H-GAC is a regional planningcommissionand politicalsubdivisionof the State of Texas operatingunder Chapter 391,Texas LocalGovernment Code;and WHEREAS,pursuantto the Act,H-GAC is authorizedto contract with eligibleentitiesto performgovernmentalfunctionsand services,including the purchase of goods and services;and WHEREAS,in reliance on such authority,H-GAC has instituteda cooperativepurchasingprogramunder which it contracts with eligible entities under the Act;and WHEREAS,End User has representedthat it is an eligibleentity under the Act,that its governingbody has authorizedthis Contract on 04/12/2018(Date),and that it desiresto contract with H-GAC on the terms set forth below; NOW,THEREFORE,H-GAC and the End User do hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE 1:LEGAL AUTHORITY The End User represents and warrants to H-GAC that (1)it is eligible to contract with H-GAC under the Act because it is one of the following:a local government,as de?ned in the Act (a county,a municipality,a special district,or other political subdivisionof the State of Texas or any other state),or a combinationof two or more of those entities,a state agency (an agency of the State of Texas as de?ned in Section771.002of the Texas Government Code,or a similar agency of another state),or a non-profitcorporationcreatedand operatedto provideone or more governmentalfunctions and services,and (2)it possessesadequate legal authority to enter into this Contract. ARTICLE 2:APPLICABLELAWS H-GAC and the End User agree to conduct all activitiesunder this Contract in accordancewith all applicablerules, regulations,and ordinances and laws in effect or promulgatedduring the term of this Contract. ARTICLE 3:WHOLE AGREEMENT__.._.._._.______._______________.._______ This Contract and any attachments,as providedherein,constitute the complete contract between the partieshereto,and supersedeany and all oral and written agreements between the parties relating to matters herein. ARTICLE 4:PERFORMANCEPERIOD The period of this Contract shall be for the balance of the ?scal year of the End User,whichbegan 01/01/2018and ends 12/31/2018.This Contract shall thereafterautomaticallybe renewedannually for each succeeding ?scal year,providedthat such renewalshall not have the effect of extending the period in which the End User may make any payment due an H-GAC contractor beyondthe fiscal year in which such obligation was incurred under this Contract. ARTICLE 5:SCOPE OF SERVICES The End User appointsH-GAC its true and lawfulpurchasingagent for the purchase of certain products and services through the H-GAC CooperativePurchasing Program.End User will access the Program through I-IGACBuy.com and by submission of any duly executedpurchaseorder,in the form prescribedby H-GAC to a contractor having a valid contract with H-GAC. All purchases hereunder shall be in accordance with specificationsand contract terms and pricing establishedby H-GAC. Ownership(title)to productspurchasedthrough H-GAC shalltransferdirectly from the contractor to the End User. Page 50 of 130 ARTICLE 6:P ENTS H-GAC will confirm each order and issue notice to contractor to proceed.Upon delivery of goods or services purchased,and presentationof a properly documented invoice,the End User shall promptly,and in any case within thirty (30)days,pay H- GAC’s contractor tlle ?lll amount of the invoice.All payments for goods or services will be made from current revenues available to tlle paying party.In no event shall H-GAC have any ?nancial liability to the End User for any goods or selvices End User procures from an H-GAC contractor. ARTICLE 7:CHANGES AN]AMEEDMENTS This Contmct lnay be amended only by a \vritten anlelldnlentexecuted by botll parties,except tllat any alterations,additions,or deletions to the terms of this Contract which are reqllired by changes in Federal and State law or regulationsare automatically incorporated into this Contract without written amendment hereto and sllall become effective on the date designated by such low or regulation. H-GAC reserves the right to make changesin the scope of productsand services offered throughthe H-GAC Cooperative Purchasing Program to be perfanned hereunder. ARTICLE 8:TERMNAI I12!EROCEDURES l-I-GAC or the End User may cancel this Contract at any time upon thilty (30)days written notice by certi?ed mailto tlle other palty to this Contract.The obligations of the End User,including its obligation to pay l-I-GAC‘s contractor for all costs incurred under this Contract prior to such notice shall survive such cancellation,as well as any other obligation incurred under this Contract,until perfonned or discharged by the End User. ARTICLE 9:SEVE TY All parties agree that should any provision of this Contract be determinedto be invalid or unenforceable,such determination shall not affect any othertem of this Contract.which shall continue in full force and effect. ARTICLE 10:FORCE MAJEUE To the extent that either party to this Contract shall be wllolly or paltially prevented ?oln the performancewithin the tenn speci?ed of any obligation or duty placed on such party by reason of or through strikes,stoppage of labor,riot,tire,?ood,acts of war,insurrection,accident,order of any court,act of God,or speci?c cause reasonably beyond the party's control and not attributable to its neglect or nonfeasance,in such event,the time for the perfonttance of such obligation or duty shall be suspended until such disability to perform is removed;provided,however.force majetue shall not excuse an obligation solely to pay funds.Detennination of force majeure shall lest solely with I-l-GAC. ARTICLE 11:VENUE Disputes between procuring party and Vendor arc to be resolved in accord with the law and venue rules of the State of purchase. THIS INSTRUMENT HAS BEEN EXECUTED BY THE PARTIES HERETO AS FOLLOWS: City of Engh.-wood Houston-Grllvzstalr Area Council Name of End User (local government,agency,or non~profn 3555 Timmons Lane,Suite 120,Houston,TX corporation)77027 3615 S.Elati Street By: Mailing Address Executive Director Englewood.CO 80110 Date: Ci John Collins,Chiel‘of Police Typed Nalne &Title of Signatory.Date Page 51 of 130 HI!SKIRT PUICHAIIIIO J?lllflull n END USER DATA Please sign and return the Interlocal Contract,along with this completedform,to H-GAC by emailing it to cpcontractt‘ax@h-gac.comor by faxing it to 7l3-993-2424.The contract may also be mailed to: H-GAC Cooperative Purchasing Proganl P.O.Box 22777,Houston.TX 77227-2777 Name of End User Agency:City of Englewood County Name:COLORADO Mailing Address:3615 S.Elati Street Englewood,CO 80110 Main Telephone Number:(303)761-7410 FAX Number: Physical Address:3615 S.Elati Street Englewood,CO 80110 Web Site Address:www.englewoodco.gov Of?cial Contact:Vance Fender Title:Commander MailingAddress:3615 S.Elati Street Ph No.:(303)762-2442 Englewood,CO 80110 F X No.: E-Mail Address:VFender@,englewoodco.gov AuthorizedOfficial:John Collins Title:Chief of Police Mailing Address:3615 S.Elati Street Ph No.:(303)762-2460 Englewood,CO 80110 FX No.: E-Mail Address:JCol|ins@englewoodco.gov Of?cial Contact:Title: Mailing Address:Ph No.7: ,FX No.: E-Mail Address: Official Contact:Title: Mailing Address:Ph No.: ,FX No.: E-Mail Address: Official Contact:Title: Mailing Address:Ph No.: ,FX No.: E-Mail Address: Page 52 of 130 Project Summary Report Englewood Police HQ Generated Jun 14, 2018 by budget4cast.com Englewood PD - Overall Budget 6-14-18 Budget Code Original Budget Reallocations Current Budget Committed Costs Non-Forecasted Invoices Approved Changes Requested Changes Uncommitted Costs Estimated Costs at Completion Projected Over/(Under)Previous Costs to Date Current Draw Total Total Costs to Date % Complete Balance To Finish A B A+B C D E F G C+D+E+F+G (C+D+E+F+G) - (A+B)H I H+I (H+I) / (C+D+E+F+G)(C+D+E+F+G) - (H+I) Project Total 26,946,549 53,451 27,000,000 23,929,041 518 271,527 0 951,689 25,152,775 (1,847,225)6,236,572 798,725 7,035,296 28%18,117,478 Soft Costs 3,044,300 20,047 3,064,347 2,899,286 518 90,426 0 0 2,990,229 (74,117)2,041,687 50,076 2,091,763 70%898,467 00 — Owner Costs 573,143 55,282 628,425 560,837 518 0 0 0 561,355 (67,071)140,882 0 140,882 25%420,473 01 — Planning and Permitting Fees 78,666 0 78,666 24,011 0 0 0 0 24,011 (54,655)24,011 0 24,011 100%0 02 — Tap & Utility Fees 50,000 55,741 105,741 105,741 0 0 0 0 105,741 0 77,525 0 77,525 73%28,216 03 — City Use Tax 394,767 (459)394,308 394,308 0 0 0 0 394,308 (0)18,750 0 18,750 5%375,558 07 — Owner/Relocation Costs 49,710 0 49,710 36,777 518 0 0 0 37,295 (12,415)20,596 0 20,596 55%16,699 10 — Design/Consulting Fees 2,471,157 (35,236)2,435,921 2,338,449 0 90,426 0 0 2,428,875 (7,047)1,900,805 50,076 1,950,881 80%477,994 11 — Design Team 1,616,039 54,976 1,671,015 1,590,970 0 80,045 0 0 1,671,015 0 1,426,103 27,564 1,453,666 87%217,349 12 — Surveying 20,200 (20,200)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%0 13 — Geotechnical 10,000 0 10,000 7,900 0 1,700 0 0 9,600 (400)9,600 0 9,600 100%0 14 — Environmental Consulting/Testing 0 16,988 16,988 8,308 0 8,681 0 0 16,988 0 8,262 0 8,262 49%8,726 15 — Commissioning 0 45,325 45,325 45,325 0 0 0 0 45,325 0 9,065 0 9,065 20%36,261 16 — Project Management 564,375 0 564,375 564,375 0 0 0 0 564,375 0 352,287 17,500 369,787 66%194,588 17 — Misc Consulting Fees 60,000 0 60,000 53,353 0 0 0 0 53,353 (6,647)48,850 1,500 50,350 94%3,004 18 — Material Testing/Inspections 200,543 (132,325)68,218 68,218 0 0 0 0 68,218 0 46,639 3,512 50,152 74%18,067 Hard Costs 22,335,298 230,246 22,565,544 21,029,755 0 181,101 0 951,689 22,162,545 (402,998)4,194,885 748,649 4,943,534 22%17,219,012 20 — Construction Costs 21,054,250 156,606 21,210,856 21,029,755 0 181,101 0 0 21,210,856 0 4,194,885 748,649 4,943,534 23%16,267,323 21 — A&P Construction GMP 21,054,250 156,606 21,210,856 21,029,755 0 181,101 0 0 21,210,856 0 4,194,885 748,649 4,943,534 23%16,267,323 30 — Furniture, Fixtures, & Equipment 1,281,048 73,640 1,354,688 0 0 0 0 951,689 951,689 (402,998)0 0 0 0%951,689 31 — Furniture 845,070 (111,308)733,762 0 0 0 0 733,762 733,762 0 0 0 0 0%733,762 32 — IT/AV Systems & Equipment 269,275 0 269,275 0 0 0 0 0 0 (269,275)0 0 0 0%0 33 — Security Systems 136,703 125,000 261,703 0 0 0 0 157,980 157,980 (103,723)0 0 0 0%157,980 34 — Interior Signage 30,000 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 (30,000)0 0 0 0%0 35 — Gym Equipment 0 59,948 59,948 0 0 0 0 59,948 59,948 0 0 0 0 0%59,948 Page 53 of 130 Budget Code Original Budget Reallocations Current Budget Committed Costs Non-Forecasted Invoices Approved Changes Requested Changes Uncommitted Costs Estimated Costs at Completion Projected Over/(Under)Previous Costs to Date Current Draw Total Total Costs to Date % Complete Balance To Finish A B A+B C D E F G C+D+E+F+G (C+D+E+F+G) - (A+B)H I H+I (H+I) / (C+D+E+F+G)(C+D+E+F+G) - (H+I) Project Total 26,946,549 53,451 27,000,000 23,929,041 518 271,527 0 951,689 25,152,775 (1,847,225)6,236,572 798,725 7,035,296 28%18,117,478 Contingency 1,566,951 (196,841)1,370,110 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1,370,110)0 0 0 0%0 90 — Contingency 1,566,951 (196,841)1,370,110 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1,370,110)0 0 0 0%0 91 — Project Contingency 1,566,951 (196,841)1,370,110 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1,370,110)0 0 0 0%0 Project Total 26,946,549 53,451 27,000,000 23,929,041 518 271,527 0 951,689 25,152,775 -1,847,225 6,236,572 798,725 7,035,296 28%18,117,478 Page 54 of 130 ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? INSR ADDL SUBR LTR INSD WVD PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: FAXPHONE (A/C, No):(A/C, No, Ext): E-MAIL ADDRESS: INSURER A : INSURED INSURER B : INSURER C : INSURER D : INSURER E : INSURER F : POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXPTYPE OF INSURANCE LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LIAB WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTEDCLAIMS-MADE OCCUR $PREMISES (Ea occurrence) MED EXP (Any one person) $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PRO-POLICY LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGGJECT OTHER:$ COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $(Ea accident) ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) $ OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION $ PER OTH- STATUTE ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ If yes, describe under E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMITDESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Y / N N / A (Mandatory in NH) SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:REVISION NUMBER: CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.ACORD 25 (2016/03) CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) $ $ $ $ $ The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD PVIANZON Jennifer Wilke 06/27/2018 ERGOSYS-02 A CUP9A18097116 B BA9A17253A16 C UB5J6756881742G A 6809A1681951742 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 10,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 5,000 300,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 X X X X X X X X License # 0757776 10/01/2017 10/01/2018 10/01/2017 10/01/2018 10/01/2017 10/01/2018 10/01/2017 10/01/2018 RE: Contract for Services Agreement Number CFS/18-33, furnish the City of Englewood Police Department Dispatch Furniture Installation City of Englewood is an additional insured for General Liability. HUB International Insurance Services (COL) 1125 17th Street, Suite 900 Denver, CO 80202 (866) 243-0727(720) 207-2367 City of Englewood Procurement Division 3615 S. Elati St. Englewood, CO 80110 Ergoflex Systems, Inc. dba Xybix Systems, Inc. CQCR LLC 8207 Southpark Cr Littleton, CO 80120 The Travelers Indemnity Company of America Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of Americ The Phoenix Insurance Company 25666 19046 25623 X X jennifer.wilke@hubinternational.com X X X Page 55 of 130 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Brook Bell DEPARTMENT: Community Development DATE: August 6, 2018 SUBJECT: CB 20 - Synergy Medical Planned Unit Development DESCRIPTION: CB 20 - Synergy Medical Planned Unit Development RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council adoption of a Bill for an Ordinance at 1st reading for the approval of the Synergy Medical Planned Unit Development (PUD). PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: On June 16, 2018 Council held a Public Hearing and considered testimony on the Synergy Medical Planned Unit Development (PUD). Following the Public Hearing, by a vote of 6 in favor with 0 opposed, Council directed staff to bring forward a Bill for an Ordinance to 1st reading for the approval of the Synergy Medical PUD. ANALYSIS: The applicant has submitted an application to rezone the parcels above from M-2 Mixed-Use Medical, Office, High Density Residential and Limited Retail Zone District to the Synergy Medical Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed PUD includes approximately 92,000 square feet of medical office space and 14,000 square feet of first floor retail/restaurant space with a self-contained, covered parking structure. PROPERTY LOCATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USES: The subject property of this PUD is located on East Hampden Avenue between South Pennsylvania Street and South Pearl Street. The property extends approximately 225 feet south of Hampden Avenue on the west side of the alley, and approximately 200 feet south of Hampden Avenue on the east side of the alley. The subject property lies within the M-2 zone district, and is approximately 56,125 square feet or 1.29 acres including the proposed alley vacation. Land to the west, south, and east of the subject property is also zoned M-2 and contains a thrift store, parking lots, a residence, a hair salon, apartments, and a parking structure. Land to the north of the subject property is zoned M-1 Mixed-Use Medical, Office, and High Density Residential Zone District and contains the Swedish Medical Center. PUD PROCEDURE: Rezoning to a PUD requires the applicant to have a pre-application meeting with staff and a neighborhood meeting with owners and tenants located within 1,000 feet of the proposed PUD. After the neighborhood meeting a formal application is made to the City and reviewed by City Departments and any other affected outside agencies. A public hearing is held before the Page 56 of 130 Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council; following the City Council public hearing, there are 1st and 2nd readings of the Ordinance. If the PUD is approved, there is a 30-day referendum period before becoming effective. BACKGROUND: The Planned Unit Development is a rezoning process that establishes specific zoning and site planning criteria to meet the needs of a specific development proposal that may not be accommodated within existing zoning development regulations. A PUD rezoning provides the opportunity for unified development control of multiple properties or multiple uses. Arculius LLC owns the western portion of the subject property and HCA-HealthONE LLC (Swedish Medical Center) owns the eastern portion of the property. The developer CC 2.5 Associates, LLC has been authorized by Arculius LLC and HCA-HealthONE LLC (Swedish Medical Center) to apply for the PUD and alley vacation, and is under contract to purchase the property contingent upon approval of the PUD. The developer proposes two distinct uses for this location in the Medical District - retail/restaurants and state of the art medical office space. The mixed-use building will contain four levels of medical office over one level of retail/restaurant space. The parking structure will contain one level below grade, one level at grade, and one level above grade, totaling approximately 293 spaces. The applicant is proposing to vacate the existing alley and associated utilities. The utilities and a paved alley will be relocated and turned westward along the south edge of the property in a transportation and utility easement that will be dedicated to the City. The alley vacation and dedication of the transportation and utility easement will require City Council approval. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARY: Pursuant to the PUD procedure, the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on August 24, 2017, prior to submitting the application for a PUD rezoning on January 9, 2018. A second neighborhood meeting was held on February 8, 2018 in accordance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) provision requiring that the maximum time between the neighborhood meeting and a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission shall not be more than one hundred eighty (180) days. Meeting notes for both neighborhood meetings are attached to this report (See Attachments B and C). CITY DEPARTMENT AND DIVISION REVIEW: The Synergy Medical PUD and subsequent revisions were reviewed by the City’s Development Review Team (DRT) on January 23rd, April 17th, and May 15th of 2018. All issues identified by the DRT were addressed by the applicant following the May 15 meeting and the final Synergy Medical PUD submittal has no objections from any City departments. PUD OVERVIEW: The proposed Synergy Medical PUD relates to the scale of the adjacent multi-story Swedish Medical Center to the north as well as to the urban fabric of East Hampd en Avenue. The proposed Synergy Medical parking garage steps down to the south to be more compatible with the residential and commercial buildings to the south and east. The building is set close to East Hampden Avenue continuing the pattern set by existing structures to the east and west. All new and existing utilities within the property and abutting right-of-way will be placed underground. The development is urban in character with a pedestrian scale at the street level. Page 57 of 130 Architectural Character: The proposed PUD contains architectural character standards that require a mix of material pattern and color changes, higher ceiling height on the first floor, and a requirement that building entries be clearly defined with architectural elements. The first floor of the building generally include glass and masonry, while the upper floors transition to panelized stucco, glass, and other metal panel accents. It should be noted that the conceptual elevations and perspective renderings are subject to change; however, any changes would have to meet the Architectural Character provisions of the PUD. The canopies shown on the northern portion of the building extend over the ROW line and will require an encroachment agreement with City Council approval. Permitted Uses: The subject property lies within the M-2 Mixed-Use Medical, Office, High Density Residential and Limited Retail Zone District. The existing M-2 Zone District allows various residential, public//institutional, and commercial uses. The proposed PUD District Plan includes a table of uses listing permitted commercial uses, which generally include food and beverage services, medical services, office, retail, and associated parking facilities. It should be noted that the proposed PUD District Plan does not permit residential or public/institutional uses. Dimensional Standards: The following table provides a comparison between the property’s existing M-2 zone dimensional standards and the proposed Synergy Medical PUD dimensional standards. COMPARISON OF DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES Min Lot Area (sq ft) Max Lot Coverage (%) Min LotWidth (ft) Max Height (ft) Max Retail Gross Floor Area (sq ft) Minimum Setbacks (ft) Front Front Upper Story Setback Above 60 Feet Side Adjacent Street Rear M-2 (Existing Zoning) All Allowed Uses None None None 145 10,000 no more than 10 20 no more than 10 5 Synergy Medical PUD (New Zoning) All Allowed Uses None None None 100 14,000 no more than 10 0 no more than 10 0 Building Height: The maximum building heights in the PUD are based on the average elevation of the finished grade at the corners of the building to the highest point of the building. The maximum allowed building height for the Synergy Medical PUD is 100 feet, although the PUD drawings label the height as being 75 feet to the bottom of the fifth floor. The maximum allowed building height of 100 feet does not include mechanical equipment, which per the UDC, may exceed the maximum building height by 30%. It should be noted that the existing M-2 zoning has a maximum building height of 145 feet. Page 58 of 130 Bulk Plane: The bulk plane that regulates building mass is a function of required setbacks and maximum building height. The existing M-2 zoning has no bulk plane requirements; however, the M-2 zoning does have a front upper story setback of 20 feet for portions of the building above 60 feet. The Synergy Medical PUD proposes no front upper story setback; however, because of the lower maximum height required by the PUD, there is no impact of removing the 20 foot upper story setback in terms of shadowing. Sheet 19 of the PUD drawings (Attachment A) illustrates the projected shadows for the building during the winter and summer solstice as well as the spring and fall equinox. Parking: The UDC requires 1 space per 100 SF for restaurants, 1 space per 600 SF for retail, and 1 space per 300 SF for office uses. The Synergy Medical PUD proposes 1 space per 600 SF for restaurants, 1 space per 600 SF for retail, and 1 space per 300 SF for offi ce uses. The reduced parking requirement for restaurants is based on a parking demand projection report completed by Walker Parking Consultants. The report cites the building’s proximity to the 4,200 population base of Swedish and Craig hospitals that are already parked in the vicinity as employees, patients, or visitors. The customer base for restaurants in the PUD will be largely from this already parked population base. The Walker report also cites managed valet parking, and the proximity to RTD routes 12, 35, and the Englewood Trolley. Based on the parking ratios discussed above, the total amount of required parking spaces is 281; the Synergy Medical PUD provides 293 parking spaces. The UDC requires bicycle parking at a rate of 1 bicycle space for every 10 vehicle parking spaces; this would translate to 30 bicycle parking spaces. The proposed Synergy Medical PUD provides 56 bicycle parking spaces. Traffic: A traffic impact study was prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates for the proposed Synergy Medical PUD. The study encompassed the area between Logan Street on the west, Clarkson Street on the east, Hampden Avenue on the north, and US-285 on the south. Traffic impact studies use a level of service (LOS) designation to describe operating conditions a driver will experience while traveling on a particular street during a specific time interval. LOS can range from A (very little delay) to F (long delays and congestion). For intersections and roadways in the study area, standard traffic engineering practice recommends intersection LOS D as the minimum threshold for acceptable operations for signalized intersections, and LOS E for movements of unsignalized intersections. The Synergy Medical traffic impact study indicates that after the project is constructed, the levels of service (LOS) for the intersections within the study area will range from A to C. Based on the analysis presented in the traffic impact study, Kimley-Horn and Associates believes the proposed Synergy Medical PUD can be successfully incorporated into the existing and future roadway network. Public Works Traffic Division reviewed the traffic impact study and the City’s Traffic Engineer concurred with its findings. Signage: The Synergy Medical PUD District Plan contains provisions for signage that vary slightly from the UDC. The PUD allows 2 Multi-Story Building Wall Signs per building face, whereas the UDC only allows 1 per building face; however, the PUD restricts the size of such signs to approximately one half of the size that the UDC would allow. The PUD allows Private Parking/Traffic Direction Signs of up to 25 SF, whereas the UDC only allows 6 SF; however, the size and scale of the Synergy building and associated parking garage warrant the increased Page 59 of 130 size for wayfinding. The PUD contains other minor deviations from the UDC signage provisions that are not significant. Landscaping: For commercial mixed-use projects in the Medical District, the UDC requires that 10% of the property be landscaped. This would translate to approximately 5,600 SF of landscaping including 18 trees and 113 shrubs. The Synergy Medical PUD is located within a highly urban context with a significant pedestrian component. The PUD proposes that the 10% landscape area calculation be based on the property located between the building and the curb; this translates to 656 SF of landscape area. The Synergy Medical PUD provides 750 SF of landscape area including 14 trees and 38 shrubs. Staff believes that the pedestrian environment created by the street trees, shrub beds, raised planters, granite pavers, seat walls and pedestrian lights is desirable and appropriate for this distinctly urban location. Drainage: The proposed Grading Plan and Preliminary Drainage Report were reviewed and approved by the City’s Public Works Department. Utilities: The proposed Utility Plan was reviewed and approved by the City’s Utility Department. E.M.C. 16-2-8: CRITERIA FOR REVIEW The City Council shall only approve a proposed PUD rezoning if it finds that the proposed rezoning meets the six criteria listed below. To make their decision, the City Council shall rely upon the evidence presented at the public hearing, as well as the written recommendations of both the City’s staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Council is to review the criteria for approval of a recommended PUD as provided in 16-2-8. See Attachment G for the PUD Decision Matrix. (1) The application is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and this Title; The Synergy Medical PUD meets the following Comprehensive Plan objectives: • Objective Work-1.2. The Synergy Medical PUD attracts new businesses to the City that provide quality jobs across a range of skill levels. • Objective Work-1.3. The Synergy Medical PUD increases the value and appeal of Englewood’s commercial and mixed-use districts by supporting and facilitating improvement of the building stock. • Objective Work-2.3. The Synergy Medical PUD attracts employers providing a living wage, defined as an income sufficient to afford adequate shelter, food, and other necessities of life. • Objective Work-3.1. The Synergy Medical PUD is a mixed-use development that includes both retail and medical office uses. • Objective Move-1.7. The Synergy Medical PUD maintains an appropriate parking supply for mixed-use districts. • Objective Move-3.1. The Synergy Medical PUD provides safe and comfortable pedestrian facilities that are ADA compliant and encourage pedestrian activity. • Objective Shop-1.1. The Synergy Medical PUD attracts retail businesses that provide diverse offerings to residents and workers. • Objective Shop-1.2. The Synergy Medical PUD attracts a mix of complementary retail uses within a key commercial node. Page 60 of 130 The City’s Development Review Team (DRT) reviewed the Synergy Medical PUD and the applicant addressed all issues identified by the DRT. The content of the PUD documents is consistent with the requirements of Title 16. (2) The application is in conformance with adopted and generally accepted development standards. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable use, development, and design standards set forth in Title 16 that are not otherwise modified or waived according to the rezoning approval. The Synergy Medical PUD was reviewed by the DRT and is in conformance with adopted and generally accepted development standards. The proposed development complies with all applicable use, development, and design standards set forth in Title 16 that are not otherwise modified or waived according to the proposed PUD. (3) The applicationis in conformance with any other ordinance, law or requirement of the City. The Synergy Medical PUD was reviewed by the DRT and is in conformance with any other ordinance, law or requirement of the City. (4) The application is substantially consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City. The Synergy Medical PUD is substantially consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City as detailed in the Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives listed above. (5) The resulting rezoned property will not have a significant negative impact on those properties surrounding the rezoned area and the general public health, safety and welfare of the community will be protected. • There is no impact from removing the 20 foot upper story setback in terms of shadowing as illustrated on the projected shadows for the proposed building. • The parking report completed by Walker Parking Consultants indicates that the proposed PUD has adequate parking and will not have negative impacts on the surrounding properties. • Based on the analysis presented in the traffic impact study, the City’s Traffic Engineer concurs that the proposed Synergy Medical PUD can be successfully incorporated into the existing and future roadway network. • The pedestrian environment created by the street trees, shrub beds, raised planters, granite pavers, seat walls and pedestrian lights is desirable and appropriate for this distinctly urban location. • The proposed Grading Plan and Preliminary Drainage Report were reviewed and approved by the City’s Public Works Department. • The proposed Utility Plan was reviewed and approved by the City’s Utility Department. • In summary, the rezoned property will not have a significant negative impact on those properties surrounding the rezoned area and the general public health, safety and welfare of the community will be protected. (6) The proposed rezoning shall meet either the criteria set forth in either subsection 6(a) OR 6(b) as follows: (6a) The proposed development will exceed the development quality standards; OR levels of public amenities; OR levels of design innovation otherwise applicable under this Title 16; AND the proposed development would not be allowed or practicable under a standard zone district Page 61 of 130 with conditional uses or with a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjustments. The proposed PUD will exceed the development quality standards required by the UDC for development in the M-2 zone district as follows: • The proposed Synergy Medical PUD has more restrictive land uses than the existing M- 2 zone district. The proposed PUD District Plan does not permit residential or public//institutional uses. • The proposed Synergy Medical PUD has more restrictive height limitations than the existing M-2 zone district. • The UDC has no requirements for buildings in the M-2 zone district in terms of architectural character standards that require a mix of material pattern and color changes, higher ceiling height on the first floor, and a requirement that building entries be clearly defined with architectural elements. The proposed PUD includes architectural character standards. The proposed development would not be allowed or practicable under the M-2 zone district as it would require multiple Zoning Variances including: • A Variance to exceed the maximum 10,000 SF gross retail floor area by 4,000 SF. • A Variance to eliminate the minimum 20-foot upper story setback for structures above 60 feet. • A Variance to reduce the minimum 5-foot rear setback to 0 feet. • A Variance or Alternative Parking Plan to reduce the restaurant parking ratio from 1 space per 100 SF to 1 space per 600 SF. • A Variance to allow 2 Multi-Story Building Wall Signs per building face, whereas the UDC only allows 1 per building face, and a Variance to allow Private Parking/Traffic Direction Signs of up to 25 SF, whereas the UDC only allows 6 SF. • A Variance to reduce the minimum required landscaped area from approximately 5,600 SF to 750 SF. OR 6(b) The property cannot be developed, or no reasonable economic use of the property can be achieved, under the existing zoning, even through the use of conditional uses or a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjustments. It is difficult for staff to determine whether the property could be developed, or a reasonable economic use of the property could be achieved, under the existing zoning, even with the use of conditional uses or a reasonable number of Zoning Variances. PUD SUMMARY: The applicant conducted the required neighborhood meeting(s) prior to submitting the application for a PUD rezoning. The City’s Development Review Team (DRT) has reviewed the proposed Synergy Medical PUD and the applicant has addressed all issues identified by the DRT. The PUD application and associated documents comply with the requirements of the UDC. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the proposed Synergy Medical PUD at a public hearing conducted on June 5, 2018. The Commission considered testimony and by a vote of 9 in favor, with 0 opposed, to forward a favorable recommendation for approval to City Council with the following condition: 1. That the applicant pave the alley from the subject property south to US 285. Page 62 of 130 The Staff Report, Minutes, and Findings of Fact from the June 5, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing are attached as Attachments D, E, and F. Based on the Development Review Team’s review of the Synergy Medical PUD application and E.M.C. 16-2-8: criteria for review above, the Community Development Department recommends Council adoption of a Bill for an Ordinance at 1st reading for the approval of the Synergy Medical PUD. Council is to review the criteria for approval of a recommended PUD as provided in 16-2-8. See Attachment G for the PUD Decision Matrix. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: The Synergy Medical Office Building construction cost is estimated at approximately $28 million. Based on that figure, the taxes, permits, tap fees, and other fees will generate the following revenue during construction: Use Tax $490,000 Arap County Open Space Tax $35,000 Building Permit $99,859 Plan Review Fee $64,908 Tap Fees $48,777 TOTAL $738,544 ATTACHMENTS: Council Bill #20 Attachment A: Synergy Medical PUD Drawings Attachment B: Neighborhood Meeting Summary - August 24, 2017 Attachment C: Neighborhood Meeting Summary - February 8, 2018 Attachment D: Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report - June 5, 2018 Attachment E: Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - June 5, 2018 Attachment F: Planning and Zoning Commission Findings of Fact - June 5, 2018 Attachment G: City Council PUD Decision Matrix Page 63 of 130 1 BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. ____ COUNCIL BILL NO. 20 SERIES OF 2018 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ________________ A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF 506 EAST HAMPDEN AVENUE, 510 EAST HAMPDEN AVENUE, 550 EAST HAMPDEN AVENUE, 558 EAST HAMPDEN AVENUE, 3528 SOUTH PENNSYLVANIA STREET, 3532 AND SOUTH PENNSYLVANIA STREET FROM M-2 MIXED USE MEDICAL, OFFICE, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND LIMITED RETAIL ZONE DISTRICT TO SYNERGY MEDICAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), ALL WITHIN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO. WHEREAS, The Mulhern Group and CC 2.5 Associates, LLC submitted an application to rezone the properties from M-2 Mixed Use Medical, Office, High Density Residential and Limited Retail zone district to the Synergy Medical Planned Unit Development (PUD) which would allow for medical office space, first floor retail/restaurant space, and a covered parking structure; WHEREAS, The project is comprised of 6 parcels (Parcels A, B, C, D, E, and F) totaling 56,125 square feet, approximately 1.29 acres; WHEREAS, Parcel A is the East 48.4 feet of Lots 1-5, Block 3, Higgins Englewood Gardens, commonly known as 510 East Hampden Avenue; WHEREAS, Parcel B is the West 60 Feet of Lots 43-50, Block 3, Higgins Englewood Gardens, commonly known as 550 East Hampden Avenue; WHEREAS, Parcel C is the East 65 Feet of Lots 43-50, Block 3, Higgins Englewood Gardens, commonly known as 558 East Hampden Avenue; WHEREAS, Parcel D is made up of Lots 6-7, Block 3, Higgins Englewood Gardens, commonly known as 3528 South Pennsylvania Street; WHEREAS, Parcel E is made up of Lots 8-9, Block 3, Higgins Englewood Gardens, commonly known as 3532 South Pennsylvania Street; WHEREAS, Parcel F is the West 76.6 feet of Lots 1-5, Block 3, Higgins Englewood Gardens, commonly known as 506 East Hampden Avenue; WHEREAS, The subject properties lie within the M-2 Zone District, and the properties to the West, South and East are also within the M-2 Zone District. Adjacent land uses include a thrift store, Page 64 of 130 2 parking lots, a single family residence, hair salon, apartments and a parking structure. The property directly North of the subject property is zoned M-1, Mixed-Use Medical, Office and High Density Residential Zone District and contains Swedish Medical Center; WHEREAS, The proposed Synergy Medical PUD would be bounded by South Pennsylvania Street to the West, South Pearl Street to the East, Hampden Avenue to the North, and developed lots to the South; WHEREAS, The proposed Synergy Medical PUD will provide four levels of medical offices over the first/ground level of retail/restaurant space, and will provide a parking structure on the South side of such development, with one level below grade, one level at grade or street level, and one level above grade accessible from South Pennsylvania and South Pearl Streets, containing two hundred ninety three (293) parking spaces; WHEREAS, Pursuant to the Planned Unit Development procedure, the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on August 24, 2017, and a second neighborhood meeting on February 8, 2018; WHEREAS, Pursuant to E.M.C. 16-2-8(G)(3), City Staff met with Applicant on multiple occasions, reviewed the proposed PUD for compliance with the criteria set forth within the applicable provisions of the Planning and Zoning Code, and prepared a report of its recommendations for review by the Commission and Council, and provided a copy of the report to the Applicant; WHEREAS, Pursuant to E.M.C. 16-2-8(G)(4), the Planning and Zoning Commission held a Public Hearing on June 5, 2018; WHEREAS, Pursuant to E.M.C. 16-2-8(F), the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the Synergy Medical PUD, subject to the condition of paving the associated alley; WHEREAS, Pursuant to E.M.C. 16-2-8(G)(5) the City Council shall review the proposed PUD, the recommendation of the City Staff, and the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and shall hold a public hearing on the proposed PUD prior to taking action upon the Applicant’s request; WHEREAS, The Englewood City Council conducted a Public Hearing on the proposed Synergy Medical PUD on July 16, 2018; WHEREAS, Following the public hearing, and review of all information provided, the Council may approve by Ordinance a proposed PUD rezoning if it finds that the proposed rezoning meets the criteria provided within E.M.C. 16-2-1 et seq,, or may deny the application, or may refer the proposed PUD back to the Planning Commission for any major modifications to the proposed plan based on the requirements of E.M.C. 16-2-1, et seq., which referral may include proposed amendments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The application for Synergy Medical Planned Unit Development (PUD), to rezone property to a Planned Unit Development meets the following criteria: A. The application is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Title 16. B. The application is in conformance with adopted and generally accepted development standards. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable use, development, Page 65 of 130 3 and design standards set forth in Title 16 that are not otherwise modified or waived according to the rezoning approval. C. The application is in conformance with any other ordinance, law or requirement of the City. D. The application is substantially consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City. E. The resulting rezoned property will not have a significant negative impact on those properties surrounding the rezoned area and the general public health, safety and welfare of the community will be protected. F. The proposed development would not be allowed or practicable under a standard zone district with conditional uses or with a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjustments and the proposed development will exceed one of the following: the development quality standards, or the levels of public amenities, or the levels of design innovation otherwise applicable under Title 16. Section 2. The application for the Synergy Medical Planned Unit Development (PUD), to rezone property located at 506, 510, 550, and 558 East Hampden Avenue, and 3528 and 3532 South Pennsylvania Street, all within the City of Englewood, Colorado, to such Planned Unit Development, in conformance with such application attached hereto as Exhibit A, including the modification of paving the associated alley as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission, is hereby approved. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 6th day of August, 2018. Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City’s official newspaper on the 9th day of August, 2018. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City’s official website beginning on the 8th day of August, 2018. Linda Olson, Mayor ATTEST: Stephanie Carlile, City Clerk I, Stephanie Carlile, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true copy of the Bill for an Ordinance passed on first reading and published by title as Ordinance No. ___, Series of 2018. Stephanie Carlile Page 66 of 130 E. Hampden Ave.S.LoganStreetS.PennsylvaniaStreetUS HWY 285 SITE S.PearlStreetSHEETPlannedUnitDevelopmentSynergyMedical506EastHampdenAvenueDATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NUMBER The information contained in this drawing file is intended for use only on this project. Unauthorized reproduction or use in other projects is not permitted. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no liability for unauthorized reproduction, changes to or use of the information contained herein. The information contained herein as provided on an "as-is" basis. The Mulhern Group disclaims all warranties with regard to the data contained in this drawing file and to the performance of the delivery media, including all implied warranties of fitness. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no obligations or liabilities for damages, including, but not limited to, consequential damages arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this drawing file and its delivery media.Englewood,ColoradoSynergy Medical Planned Unit Development Englewood, Colorado 01 OF 22 COVER SHEET GE JC 05-25-2018 15016.00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PORTION OF BLOCK 3, HIGGINS ENGLEWOOD GARDENS, LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPLE MERIDIAN CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO PROJECT BACKGROUND THE PROJECT SITE IS ON EAST HAMPDEN AVENUE BETWEEN SOUTH PENNSYLVANIA STREET AND SOUTH PEARL STREET IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. THE SITE IS CURRENTLY BIFURCATED BY A PUBLIC ALLEY THAT IS ANTICIPATED TO BE VACATED BY THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD WITH A NEW ACCESS ALLEY PROVIDED ON THE WEST HALF OF THE BLOCK. THE EAST PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 25,000 SF, THE WEST PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 28,125 SF AND THE ALLEY PORTION IS APPROXIMATELY 3,000 SF FOR A TOTAL SITE AREA FOR DEVELOPMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 56,125 SF. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO DEVELOP A MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING WITH RETAIL SPACE AND STRUCTURED PARKING IN THE SWEDISH/CRAIG HOSPITAL DISTRICT IN ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO. THE MIXED USE BUILDING WILL CONTAIN FOUR LEVELS OF OFFICE OVER ONE LEVEL OF RETAIL AND OFFICE SPACE; PARKING CONSISTING OF ONE LEVEL OF BELOW -GRADE PARKING, ONE LEVEL OF AT-GRADE PARKING AND ONE LEVEL OF ABOVE -GRADE PARKING CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 293 PARKING SPACES; THE RETAIL COMPONENT IS APPROXIMATELY 14,060 GSF; THE OFFICE COMPONENT IS APPROXIMATELY 92,600 GSF; THE TOTAL BUILDING IS APPROXIMATELY 109,957 GSF. IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT THE EXISTING ALLEY AND ITS ASSOCIATED UTILITIES WILL BE VACATED AND THE UTILITIES MOVED. A NEW PAVED ALLEY WILL BE LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH EDGE OF THE PROPERTY TO ROUTE TRAFFIC TO PENNSYLVANIA STREET THROUGH AN EASEMENT CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD ALLOWING THE ALLEY TO BE UTILIZED FOR UTILITIES AND OTHER SERVICES ESSENTIAL TO THE PROJECT. CONTACT LIST DEVELOPER: CC2.5 ASSOCIATES, LLC C/O: HILL COMPANIES ATTN: JIM HILL 8100 EAST MAPLEWOOD AVENUE, SUITE 220 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, COLORADO, 80111 T: 303-770-6055 JHILL@HILL-COMPANIES.COM CIVIL ENGINEER: KIMLEY-HORN ATTN: DENNIS SOBIESKI PE, LEED AP 4582 SOUTH ULSTER STREET, SUITE 1500 DENVER, COLORADO 80237 T: 303-228-2335 DENNIS.SOBIESKI@KIMLEY-HORN.COM ARCHITECT: THE MULHERN GROUP ATTN: GARY ELLERMANN 1400 GLENARM PLACE, SUITE 300 DENVER, COLORADO 80202 T: 303-297-3334 GELLERMANN@THEMULHERNGROUP.COM TRAFFIC ENGINEER: KIMLEY-HORN ATTN: CURTIS ROWE PE, PTOE 4582 SOUTH ULSTER STREET, SUITE 1500 DENVER, COLORADO 80237 T: 303-228-2304 CURTIS.ROWE@KIMLEY-HORN.COM SIGNATURE BLOCKS CC2.5 ASSOCIATES, LLC: SIGNATURE DATE: STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF A.D. 20 , BY AS OF MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOTARY PUBLIC ADDRESS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRPERSON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORDING SECRETARY MAYOR OF ENGLEWOOD ATTESTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF A.D. 20 , BY AS OF CITY CLERK THIS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IS ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO AT O'CLOCK, .M., THIS DAY OF A.D. 20 RECEPTION NUMBER ,BOOK NUMBER PAGE NUMBER . CLERK AND RECORDER BY DEPUTY VICINITY MAP SHEET INDEX 01 OF 22 COVER SHEET 02 OF 22 DISTRICT PLAN 03 OF 22 EXISTING SITE PLAN 04 OF 22 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 05 OR 22 PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN 06 OF 22 PROPOSED GRADING PLAN 07 OF 22 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN 08 OF 22 LEVEL P1 09 OF 22 GROUND LEVEL PLAN 10 OF 22 LEVEL P3- ABOVE GRADE PARKING 11 OF 22 LEVEL 2 THRU 5 - TYPICAL OFFICE FLOOR PLAN 12 OF 22 ROOF PLAN 13 OF 22 SOUTH ELEVATION 14 OF 22 WEST ELEVATION 15 OF 22 NORTH ELEVATION 16 OF 22 EAST ELEVATION 17 OF 22 BUILDING SECTION 18 OF 22 DESIGN CONCEPTS 19 OF 22 SHADOW STUDY 20 OF 22 DETAILS 21 OF 22 SURVEY 22 OF 22 SURVEY A PORTION OF BLOCK 3, HIGGINS ENGLEWOOD GARDENS, LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPLE MERIDIAN, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO N NORTH PUD DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY No.Description Date THE SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT INCLUDES THE HOSPITAL DISTRICT. SYNERGY MEDICAL IS PROPOSED TO PROVIDE TWO DISTINCT USES THAT ARE NEEDED IN THE LOCAL MARKETPLACE: RETAIL/RESTAURANTS AND STATE-OF-THE ART MEDICAL OFFICE SPACE WITH AN AMBULATORY SURGICAL CENTER OPTION. THE DESIGN OF SYNERGY MEDICAL RELATES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES SINCE THE SCALE OF THE BUILDING IS SIMILAR TO MULTI- STORY SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER LOCATED TO NORTH AND FITS INTO THE URBAN FABRIC OF EAST HAMPDEN AVENUE, YET STEPS DOWN IN SCALE/HEIGHT NEXT TO THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TO THE SOUTH & EAST. THE PROPOSED PUD IS CONSISTENT WITH OBJECTIVES OUTLINED THE ENGLEWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AS FOLLOWS: WORK •THE PROJECT SUPPORTS THE SURROUNDING HOSPITALS AND RESIDENTS BY PROVIDING NECESSARY RETAIL AND RESTAURANT USES IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO AN EXISTING EMPLOYMENT CENTER. •THE PROJECT SUPPORTS THE SURROUNDING HOSPITALS AND RESIDENTS BY PROVIDING NECESSARY ADDITIONAL MEDICAL OFFICE SPACE WITH AN AMBULATORY SURGICAL CENTER EXPANDING THE MEDICAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO THE COMMUNITY. •THE PROJECT PROVIDES A DIVERSE LAND USE THAT COMBINES MEDICAL OFFICE SPACE WITH RETAIL AND RESTAURANT USES IN A VERTICALLY INTEGRATED MANNER. MOVE •THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITH MULTI-MODAL ACCESSIBILITY INCLUDING PEDESTRIAN ACCESS, PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, VEHICULAR ACCESS AND BICYCLE ACCESS. •THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO A MAJOR EMPLOYMENT CENTER WITH WALKING CONNECTIONS TO THE SITE. •THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON AN EXISTING RTD BUS ROUTE PROVIDING ACCESS TO A REGIONAL PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEM. •PARKING IS INTEGRATED INTO THE PROJECT DESIGN IN A MANNER THAT IS CONVENIENTLY ACCESSED, PROVIDES ADEQUATE PARKING AND MINIMIZES VISUAL IMPACT OF SURFACE PARKING. •THE PROJECT IMPROVES VEHICULAR TRAFFIC FLOW BY ADDING TURNING LANES ON EAST HAMPDEN AVENUE. SHOP •THE PROJECT ALLOWS A VARIETY NEEDED RETAIL AND RESTAURANT USES THAT PROVIDES AN OFF-SITE OASIS FOR THE SWEDISH AND CRAIG HOSPITAL CAMPUSES AND THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. •THE PROJECT REPLACES AN OPEN PARKING LOT AND PROVIDES A STREET EDGE BUILDING THAT ENHANCES THE EAST HAMPDEN AVENUE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR AND STREETSCAPE. NEIGHBORHOOD FRIENDLY •THE PROJECT IS DESIGNED IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT RESPONDS TO THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT AND FITS COMFORTABLY INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT HAS A VARIETY OF USES. PUD CONTEXT STATEMENT Page 67 of 130 FloorHeight75'-0"MAX.MechEquip.mayexceed100'-0"100'-0"MAX.Mech 5 4 3 2 1 P3 P2 P1 P0 P4 SHEETPlannedUnitDevelopmentSynergyMedical506EastHampdenAvenueDATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NUMBER The information contained in this drawing file is intended for use only on this project. Unauthorized reproduction or use in other projects is not permitted. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no liability for unauthorized reproduction, changes to or use of the information contained herein. The information contained herein as provided on an "as-is" basis. The Mulhern Group disclaims all warranties with regard to the data contained in this drawing file and to the performance of the delivery media, including all implied warranties of fitness. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no obligations or liabilities for damages, including, but not limited to, consequential damages arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this drawing file and its delivery media.Englewood,ColoradoSynergy Medical Planned Unit Development Englewood, Colorado 02 OF 22 DISTRICT PLAN GE JC 05-25-2018 15016.00 ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER THE ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER OF THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE URBAN IN CHARACTER AND WILL PROVIDE FOR A PEDESTRIAN SCALE AT THE STREET LEVEL. DESIGN SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS: A.A MINIMUM OF 3 DIFFERENT MATERIAL PATTERNS AND PLANE/COLOR CHANGES SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE BUILDING DESIGN. AT LEAST ONE ADDITIONAL COLOR AND/OR MATERIAL WILL BE USED TO DIFFERENTIATE IMPORTANT ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS SUCH AS CORNERS, ENTRIES, AND COMMON USE AREAS. B.PREDOMINANT BUILDING ENTRIES SHALL BE CLEARLY DEFINED AND MAY CONSIST OF ELEMENTS SUCH AS: CANOPIES, OVERHANGS, AND/OR OUTDOOR AMENITIES (IE. BENCHES, BOLLARDS, PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS, AND SIMILAR). C.ROOF SLOPES TO BE FLAT & CONTAINED WITHIN A PARAPET. D.FIRST FLOOR RETAIL AND LOBBIES THAT ENGAGE THE STREET FRONT SHOULD HAVE PREDOMINANTLY HIGHER CEILING HEIGHTS TO HELP ENGAGE THE COMMUNITY. E.THE PALETTE OF ARCHITECTURAL MATERIALS INCLUDES THOSE TYPICALLY ASSOCIATED WITH A QUALITY MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING SUCH AS GLASS, MASONRY, AND STUCCO AND METAL PANELS.THE MATERIALS ON THE AT-GRADE LEVEL GENERALLY CONSIST OF HIGHER GRADE MATERIALS INCLUDING GLASS AND MASONRY TO DISTINGUISH THE BASE OF THE BUILDING.THE UPPER LEVEL FLOORS UTILIZE HARD-COAT STUCCO OR OTHER SIMILAR PANELIZED SKIN AND GLAZING SYSTEMS.THE PARKING STRUCTURE IS CONCRETE WITH METAL PANEL ACCENTS AT VEHICULAR ENTRANCES.THE ELEVATIONS AND COLOR PERSPECTIVE RENDERINGS WITHIN THIS PUD DEPICT THE DESIGN INTENT AND THE APPLICATION OF THESE MATERIALS, HOWEVER,THE APPLICANT MAY REVISE THESE MATERIALS AND PATTERNS IF THE DESIGN INTENT IS MAINTAINED. PUD DISTRICT PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. GENERAL REGULATIONS: UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR IN THIS PUD OR SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS. THE PROVISIONS, STANDARDS, REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES PERTINENT TO AN APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAND WITHIN THIS PUD ZONE DISTRICT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE M2 ZONE DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AND RELATED ZONING REGULATIONS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME ANY FUTURE APPLICATION IS FILED WITH THE CITY. B. GENERALLY, THE CURRENT PROPOSED LAND USES ARE: 1. RETAIL 2. OFFICE, MEDICAL OFFICE, SURGICAL 3. RESTAURANTS/BARS 4. PARKING GARAGE AND SURFACE PARKING A MORE SPECIFIC LIST OF ALL PERMITTED USES IS SHOWN IN THE "TABLE OF ALLOWED USES" BELOW. C. UNLISTED USES PROCEDURES FOR APPROVAL OF USES NOT LISTED IN THE ABOVE PERMITTED USES SHALL BE GOVERNED BY TITLE 16 PROVISIONS FOR UNLISTED USES. D. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS APPLY: 1.MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 100' 2.ANTENNAS, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, ELEVATOR PENTHOUSES, CHIMNEYS, AND SIMILAR ARE EXCLUDED FROM THIS LIMITATION. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS MODIFICATION AND AMENDMENT OF THE PUD DISTRICT PLAN:THE TERMS, CONDITIONS, THE ADOPTED PUD DISTRICT PLAN AND DOCUMENTS MAY BE CHANGED AND/OR AMENDED IN WHOLE OR IN PART AS FOLLOWS: A. MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE PUD: THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE MAY APPROVE MINOR MODIFICATIONS IN THE LOCATION, SIZING, AND HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES OR FACILITIES IF REQUIRED BY ENGINEERING OR OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES NOT FORESEEN AT THE TIME THE PUD DISTRICT PLAN WAS APPROVED.MINOR DEVIATIONS FROM THE PUD SITE PLAN WHEN SUCH DEVIATIONS APPEAR NECESSARY IN LIGHT OF TECHNICAL OR ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS. MINOR DEVIATIONS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES RESULT: 1.A CHANGE IN THE PERMITTED LAND USES; OR 2.A CHANGE IN THE GENERAL LOCATION OF LAND USES: OR 3.AN INCREASE IN THE RATIO OF THE GROSS FLOOR AREA OF STRUCTURES TO THE LAND AREA, OR INCREASES IN THE PROPOSED GROSS FLOOR AREA WITHIN ANY PARTICULAR LAND USE OF MORE THAN 5%; 4.A REDUCTION IN THE RATIO OF OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING SPACES TO FLOOR AREA IN EXCESS OF 5%. B. MAJOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE PUD: MAJOR MODIFICATIONS MAY BE MADE TO THE APPROVED PUD DISTRICT PLAN PURSUANT TO THE SAME LIMITATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS BY WHICH SUCH PLANS AND DOCUMENTS WERE ORIGINALLY APPROVED. C. SITE PLAN AMENDMENTS NOT MEETING THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS: ALL PUD SITE PLANS APPROVED AND RECORDED MAY ONLY BE AMENDED PURSUANT TO THE SAME PROCEDURE AND SUBJECT TO THE SAME LIMITATION AND REQUIREMENTS BY WHICH SUCH PLANS WERE APPROVED. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS: THE SITE IS CONSIDERED AN URBAN SITE AND AS SUCH SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1.REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA(RLA) = SITE AREA BETWEEN BUILDING AND CURB x 10%. RLA = 6564SF x 10% = 656SF 750SF PROVIDED. 2.SHRUBS (BETWEEN BUILDING AND CURB): 1 SHRUB FOR EVERY 25SF OR PORTION OF RLA 656SF / 25 = 27 SHRUBS REQUIRED 38 SHRUBS PROVIDED 3.TREES (BETWEEN BUILDING AND CURB): 1 PER 100 LINEAR FEET MINIMUM REQUIRED. TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN TREE GRATES, PLANTER BEDS W/ GRANITE PAVERS, OR RAISED CURB PLANTERS. 953LF / 100 = 10 TREES REQUIRED 14 TREES PROVIDED SCREENING: ROOFTOP MOUNTED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED BY A SCREEN WALL. MATERIALS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE OVERALL BUILDING DESIGN AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT. LIGHTING: LIGHTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: A.PARKING LOT LIGHTING SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.0 FOOTCANDLES AT INTERNAL PROPERTY LINES. PARKING LOT LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE SHIELDED OR INDIRECT. B.UPLIGHTING, DOWNLIGHTING & ACCENT LIGHTING SHALL BE ALLOWED ON ALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS. C.DOWNLIGHTING WALL LIGHTS SHALL BE ALLOWED ON THE SERVICE ALLEY. ADDITIONAL STANDARDS: A. WASTE AND RECYCLE COLLECTION: ALL FACILITIES FOR WASTE AND RECYCLING COLLECTION WILL BE INTERNAL TO THE BUILDING. NO STORAGE WILL BE EXTERNAL TO THE BUILDING, EXCEPT FOR TEMPORARY STAGING DURING WASTE AND RECYCLE REMOVAL TIMES. B. SIDEWALKS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5'-0" IN WIDTH & SHALL BE CONTINUOUS. OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS THE SITE IS CONSIDERED AN URBAN SITE WITH IMMEDIATE ADJACENCY TO TWO MAJOR REGIONAL HOSPITALS AND LOCATED ON THE EAST HAMPDEN AVENUE BUS ROUTE. DUE TO THIS ADJACENCY AND THE SYNERGY BETWEEN THIS PROJECT AND THE HOSPITALS, PARKING WILL BE PROVIDED AS FOLLOWS: RETAIL/RESTAURANTS:1 SPACE PER 600 SF MEDICAL OFFICE:1 SPACE PER 300 SF SURGERY CENTER:5.67 SPACES PER OPERATING ROOM (REFER TO ITE DATA) MISCELLANEOUS PARKING REQUIREMENT PROVISIONS: 1.VALET/TANDEM PARKING SHALL BE ALLOWED. 2.PARKING PROVIDED MAY BE ADJUSTED AS THE PROJECT IS DEVELOPED,HOWEVER, THE RATIO OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES IDENTIFIED ABOVE SHALL BE MAINTAINED. 3.A MEDICAL OFFICE FLOOR WITH A SURGERY CENTER IS ONLY REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PARKING FOR THE NUMBER OF OPERATING ROOMS PROVIDED. 4.PARKING CAN BE SECURED. 5.FOR THE PURPOSES OF CALCULATING THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES, THE BUILDING AREA MAY EXCLUDE WALLS, SHAFTS, VERTICAL CORES, STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS, COMMON AREAS, CORRIDORS AND BATHROOMS. 6.WHEN MEASURING PARKING REQUIREMENTS, FRACTIONS SHALL BE ROUNDED TO THE CLOSEST WHOLE NUMBER. 7.ADJUSTMENTS TO THE REQUIRED PARKING CAN BE MADE ADMINISTRATIVELY BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR UP TO 5% OF THE TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED IF REQUESTED AND SUBSTANTIATED BY THE APPLICANT. 8.THE REDUCED PARKING REQUIREMENTS ARE BASED UPON A PARKING DEMAND PROJECTION PROVIDED BY WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS DATED 02/25/16, PROXIMITY TO 4,200 POPULATION BASE OF SWEDISH AND CRAIG HOSPITALS, PROJECT LOCATION ON RTD RO UTES 12, 35 AND THE ART SHUTTLE, ON-SITE AMBULATORY SURGICAL CENTER AND MANAGED/VALET PARKING. PARKING AND DRIVE AISLE STANDARDS FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PUD, THE FOLLOWING PARKING STALL STANDARDS SHALL APPLY: FULL SIZED PARKING SPACES:9’-0” WIDE X 17’-6” DEEP OR LARGER COMPACT SIZED PARKING SPACES:8’-0” WIDE X 15’-0” DEEP OR LARGER HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES:9’-0” WIDE X 18’-0” DEEP OR LARGER DRIVE AISLE WIDTHS:23’-0” WIDE OR WIDER MISCELLANEOUS PARKING STANDARDS PROVISIONS 1.HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES SHALL MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS; 2.COMPACT PARKING SPACES MAY NOT EXCEED 40% OF THE TOTAL PROVIDED ON ANY LEVEL; 3.VALET PARKING STALLS MAY BE COMPACT SIZED SPACES OR LARGER AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 20% OF THE TOTAL PROVIDED IN THE PROJECT; 4.PARKING FACILITIES (STRUCTURE) IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO HAMPDEN AVENUE WITHIN THE M-1 AND M-2 ZONE DISTRICTS SHALL INCORPORATE LEASABLE, GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL SPACE TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF TWENTY (20) FEET ALONG SEVENTY-FIVE PERCENT (75%) OF THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF HAMPDEN AVENUE FRONTAGE. THIS PUD HAS NO PARKING ON THE HAMPDEN AVENUE FRONTAGE. 5.REQUIRED STRUCTURAL COLUMNS & PIPING STACKS MAY ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT EDGE OF PARKING SPACES. TABLE OF ALLOWED USES: THE FOLLOWING USES ARE PERMITTED WITHIN THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: USE CATEGORY USE TYPE FOOD AND BEVERAGE SERVICE BREWPUB CATERER MICROBREWERY RESTAURANT, BAR, TAVERN COFFEE SHOP MEDICAL/SCIENTIFIC SERVICE CLINIC, SURGICAL CENTERS, IMAGING CENTERS LABORATORY, RESEARCH, DENTISTRY OFFICE GENERAL, MEDICAL RETAIL SALES AND SERVICE INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICE (PERSONAL SERVICE)MASSAGE THERAPY FACILITY (REPAIR & RENTAL)PERSONAL CARE (HAIR, NAILS) (SALES)EXERCISE/WORKOUT SERVICE (STUDIO, PHOTO LAB, TAILOR) ANTIQUE STORE ART GALLERY CONVENIENCE STORE GROCERY/SPECIALTY FOOD STORE LIQUOR STORE RETAIL SALES, GENERAL MERCHANDISE VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT PARKING FACILITY, PRINCIPLE USE PARKING AREA, SERVICE AREAS (TRASH, GENERATORS, UTILITY ROOMS, ETC.) BACKGROUND SEVERAL PARCELS HAVE BEEN COMBINED FOR THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING: A.PRIVATE RETAIL PROPERTIES OWNED BY DR. ELLIOT AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EAST HAMPDEN AVENUE AND SOUTH PENNSYLVANIA STREET. B.EXISTING PARKING LOTS OWNED BY HCA AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAST HAMPDEN AVENUE AND SOUTH PEARL STREET C.PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES LOCATED ON SOUTH PENNSYLVANIA STREET THE PROPERTY ON SOUTH PEARL STREET IS APPROXIMATELY 25,000 SQUARE FEET. THE PROPERTY ON SOUTH PENNSYLVANIA STREET IS APPROXIMATELY 28,125 SQUARE FEET.THE PORTION OF THE ALLEY PROPOSED TO BE VACATED IS 3,000 SQUARE FEET. THE COMBINED PROPE RTY IS PROPOSED TO BE A TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY 56,125 SQUARE FEET. THE PROPERTIES ARE BACK TO BACK ACROSS AN EXISTING 15' WIDE ALLEY RUNNING NORTH-SOUTH BETWEEN EAST HAMPDEN AVENUE AND HIGHWAY 285. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS APPLICATION, WE ARE PROPOSING A PORTION OF THE ALLEY WILL BE VACATED ALLOWING FOR A CONSOLIDATED SINGLE PARCEL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED M-2, A MIXED-USE MEDICAL, OFFICE, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND LIMITED RETAIL ZONE DISTRICT. THIS DISTRICT ALLOWS HOSPITALS AND MEDICAL USES AS WELL AS GENERAL OFFICE, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, HOTELS, AND LIMITED RETAIL AS PRIMARY LAND USES. THE FOLLOWING TABLE SHOWS THE CURRENT REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE TO BE MODIFIED WITH THIS PUD FROM A M-2 ZONE. M-2 ZONING PUD REAR SETBACK:5’0' FRONT SETBACKS:0'-10'0' SIDE SETBACKS:0'-10'0' MAX RETAIL AREA 10,000 SF NONE UPPER-STORY SETBACK ABOVE 60’NONE PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS: 508 E. HAMPDEN AVE. PARCEL 2077-03-1-03-001 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1-5 EX E 50 FT BLOCK 3 HIGGINS ENGLEWOOD GARDENS 510 E. HAMPDEN AVE. PARCEL 2077-03-1-03-002 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: E 50 FT OF LOTS 1-5 BLOCK 3 HIGGINS ENGLEWOOD GARDENS 3528 S. PENNSYLVANIA ST. PARCEL 2077-03-1-03-003 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 6-7 BLOCK 3 HIGGINS ENGLEWOOD GARDENS 3532 S. PENNSYLVANIA ST. PARCEL 2077-03-1-03-004 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 8-9 BLOCK 3 HIGGINS ENGLEWOOD GARDENS 550 E. HAMPDEN AVE. PARCEL 2077-03-1-03-020 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: W 60 FT OF LOTS 43-50 BLOCK 3 HIGGINS ENGLEWOOD GARDENS 558 E. HAMPDEN AVE. PARCEL 2077-03-1-03-019 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: E 65 FT OF LOTS 43-50 BLOCK 3 HIGGINS ENGLEWOOD GARDENS SIGN PROGRAM: THE PROJECT PROPOSES TO ALLOW VARIOUS SIGNAGE TYPES ON THE BUILD ING TO MEET VARIOUS TENANT/MARKET NEEDS IN A DESIGN SENSITIVE MANNER; THEREFORE, THIS PUD PROPOSES A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM AS FOLLOWS: SIGN STANDARDS SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR SIGNAGE AS ALLOWED IN THE M2 ZONE DISTRICT WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS: THERE ARE FIVE BASIC SIGN TYPES: 1.MULTI-STORY BUILDING WALL SIGNS 2.PRINCIPAL SIGNS 3.PRINCIPAL SIGNS FOR MULTIPLE USES 4.PRIVATE PARKING/TRAFFIC DIRECTION SIGNS 5.ADDRESS SIGNS MULTI-STORY BUILDING WALL SIGNS MULTI-STORY BUILDING WALL SIGNS ARE LOCATED ONLY ABOVE THE TOP FLOOR AND MAY IDENTIFY THE BUILDING NAME OR TENANT NAME. AREAS WHERE THESE SIGNS ARE GENERALLY LOCATED ARE SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS AND SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOW ING LIMITS: 1.THERE SHALL BE A LIMIT OF TWO SUCH SIGNS PER BUILDING FACE; 2.THE MAXIMUM AREA PER SIGN SHALL BE LIMITED TO 360 SF; 3.THE MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT SHALL BE LIMITED TO 6’-0”; PRINCIPAL SIGNS PRINCIPAL SIGNS ARE LOCATED AT THE PRIMARY OFFICE BUILDING ENTRANCES (EXCLUDING TENANT ENTRANCES). AREAS WHERE THESE SIGNS ARE GENERALLY LOCATED ARE IDENTIFIED ON THE ELEVATIONS AND SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING LIMITS: 1.THERE SHALL BE A LIMIT OF ONE SIGN PER BUILDING FACE, HOWEVER, THERE MAY BE TWO SIGNS PER BUILDING FACE WHERE A PARKING ENTRANCE IS LOCATED; 2.THE MAXIMUM AREA SHALL BE LIMITED TO 80 SF; 3.THE MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT SHALL BE LIMITED TO 2’-0”; LOCATIONS: 1.BUILDING FACE; 2.ON TOP, SUSPENDED FROM OR ON THE FACE OF A PROJECTING CAN OPY; PRINCIPAL SIGNS FOR MULTIPLE USES PRINCIPAL SIGNS FOR MULTIPLE USES ARE LOCATED ABOVE TENANT FRONTAGE ONLY. AREAS WHERE THESE SIGNS ARE GENERALLY LOCATED ARE IDENTIFIED ON THE ELEVATIONS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD SIGN CODE WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS: 1.PRINCIPAL SIGNS FOR MULTIPLE USES ARE ALLOWED TWO SIGN PER STREE T FRONTAGE; 2.THE MAXIMUM AREA PER SIGN SHALL BE LIMITED TO 125 SF. LOCATIONS: 1.BUILDING FACE; 2.ON TOP, SUSPENDED FROM OR ON THE FACE OF A PROJECTING CAN OPY; PRIVATE PARKING/TRAFFIC DIRECTION SIGNS PRIVATE PARKING/TRAFFIC DIRECTION SIGNS ARE GENERALLY ORIENTED TO VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC AND INCLUDES, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: 1.WALL-MOUNTED GARAGE ENTRANCE SIGNS WITH A MAX AREA LIMITED TO 25 SF; LOCATIONS: 1.BUILDING FACE; 2.ON TOP, SUSPENDED FROM OR ON THE FACE OF A PROJECTING CANOPY & CAN BE LOCATED MORE THAN 6'-0" ABOVE GRADE 2.PEDESTRIAN-SCALED TENANT DIRECTORY MONUMENT SIGNS; MAX QUANTITY OF 4. SIZES NOT TO EXCEED 3'-0"W x 3'-0" D x 10'-0"H. ADDRESS SIGNS ADDRESS SIGNS ARE GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS AND THE MAXIMUM AREA SHALL BE LIMITED TO 32 SF. LOCATIONS: 1.BUILDING FACE; 2.ON TOP, SUSPENDED FROM OR ON THE FACE OF A PROJECTION CANOPY EXCEPTIONS: PORTABLE SIGNS 1.PORTABLE SIGNS MAY BE 5’-0” IN HEIGHT; BUILDING GRAPHICS AND BRANDING 1.BUILDING GRAPHICS/WORKS OF ART, SUCH A MOSAIC TILE PROGRAMS OR OTHER ARTISTIC INFILL GRAPHICS CAN BE USED WITHOUT RESTRICTION SO LONG AS THEY DO NOT INCLUDE TENANT BRANDING; 2.TENANTS MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL FACE APPLIED BUILDING GRAPHICS WITH OR WITHOUT TENANT NAMES; LIMITED TO 50% OF TENANT STOREFRONT GLASS AREA. 3.TENANTS MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL BRANDED AWNINGS WITH OR WITHOUT TENA NT NAMES; LIMITED TO 2 PER 30'-0" STRUCTURAL BAY. GREASE MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE OF TRANSPARENCY: THE GROUND FLOOR RETAIL SPACE FRONTING ON A PUBLIC STREET SHALL INCORPORATE TRANSPARENT GLASS FOR A PERCENTAGE OF THE LINEAL STREET FRONTAGE OF THE FIRST FLOOR.THESE WINDOWS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET (5')HIGH WITH A MINIMUM OF 10'-0" FROM ADJACENT GRADE TO THE TOP OF THE WINDOW,AND THE SILL SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN THREE FEET SIX INCHES (3'-6")HIGH ABOVE THE INTERIOR FLOOR LEVEL. TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS: 1.50%MIN.BUILDING LINEAL ZONE OF TRANSPARENCY MEASURED ADJACENT TO AND PARALLEL WITH THE HAMPDEN AVENUE FRONTAGE. 2.A 25%MINIMUM BUILDING LINEAL ZONE OF TRANSPARENCY MEASURED ADJACENT TO AND PARALLEL WITH THE SIDE LOT LINE FRONTING A PUBLIC STREET (SOUTH PEARL STREET & SOUTH PENNSYLVANIA STREET). BUILDING AREA: GROUND LEVEL / RETAIL =14,060 SF GROSS GROUND LEVEL / OFFICE LOBBY =3,297 SF GROSS LEVEL 2 / OFFICE =23,150 SF GROSS LEVEL 3 / OFFICE =23,150 SF GROSS LEVEL 4 / OFFICE =23,150 SF GROSS LEVEL 5 / SURGERY =23,150 SF GROSS TOTAL:=109,957 SF GROSS NOTE 1. THE BUILDING AREAS REPRESENTED IN THIS PUD ARE BASED UPON A SCHEMATIC DESIGN, AND AS SUCH ARE SUBJECT TO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT & MAY BE ADJUSTED UP OR DOWN 5% WITH AN ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW AND APPROVAL. BUILDING ENVELOPE THIS SITE IS AN AGGREGATION OF PARCELS THAT INCLUDES THE HCA PARKING LOT, THE FORMER COPPER POT RESTAURANT & A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. THE SITE IS CURRENTLY ZONED M2. THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS A MIXED-USE, URBAN SITE THAT WILL COMPLEMENT THE SURROUNDING USES BY PROVIDING RETAIL & RESTAURANTS, MEDICAL OFFICE SPACE, SURGERY CENTER AND ON-SITE STRUCTURED PARKING. DUE TO THE UNIQUE CONDITIONS OF THIS SITE & THE PROPOSED PROJECT, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IS USED FOR PLANNING/ZONING APPROVAL.AS A “PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT” THE DEVELOPMENT AS ENVISIONED CAN BE CONSIDERED BY THE COMMUNITY, CITY AND STAFF FOR APPROPRIATENESS GIVEN THE NEEDS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE AREA. THE FOLLOWING IDENTIFIES THE STANDARDS UNDER WHICH THE SITE WILL BE DEVELOPED. THE PROJECT ANTICIPATES APPROXIMATELY 14,000 SF OF RETAIL AND RE STAURANT SPACES, INCLUDING FULL SERVICE RESTAURANTS, BARS, QUICK-SERVE RESTAURANTS AND COFFEE, BAGEL AND SANDWICH SHOPS. DUE TO THE URBAN CONTEXT OF THIS SITE, THE MIX OF USES, PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT DENSITY, THIS PUD PROPOSES TO PROVIDE G REASE TRAPS ON A COLLECTIVE BASIS RATHER THAN ON A PER -TENANT BASIS. THE APPLICANT IS SUBMITTING BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT A GREASE MANAGEMENT PLAN THAT IDENTIFIES HOW THE COLLECTIVE GREASE TRAP WILL MEET THE LITTLETON-ENGLEWOOD WASTEWATER TREATMENT DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS. THE BUILDING AND PROPERTY OWNER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THE GREASE INTERCEPTOR IS PROPERLY INSPECTED, MAINTAINED, OPERATED,AND SERVICED. EXISTING ZONING SITE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT THE BUILDING SIZE SHOWN IN THIS PUD SHALL BE CONSIDERED THE APPROXIMATE BUILDING ENVELOPE. MINOR ADJUSTMENTS TO THE APPROXIMATE BUILDING SIZE ARE ALLOWED. THE MAXIMUM STORIES IS FIVE. THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT FROM THE HIGHEST POINT OF GRADE TO THE FIFTH FLOOR LEVEL SHALL NOT EXCEED 75'-0" AND 100'-0" TO THE TOP OF THE BUILDING. THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE OF OCCUPIABLE SPACE EXCLUDING PARKING STRUCTURE AREA SHALL BE 120,000 SF. THE APPLICANT MAY SUBMIT A PROJECT WITH A SMALLER ENVELOPE (FOR EXAMPLE: 4 STORIES IN LIEU OF 5). THE PARKING STRUCTURE MAY BE EXPANDED BY ONE LEVEL ABOVE GRADE OR ONE LEVEL BELOW GRADE TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PARKING IF DEEMED NECESSARY AT THE DISCRETION OF THE APPLICANT. OFF-STREET LOADING REQUIREMENTS ON-STREET TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT BUS STOP RELOCATION THE EXISTING BUS STOP ON EAST HAMPDEN AVENUE IN FRONT OF THE PROJECT IS PROPOSED TO BE RELOCATED ONE BLOCK TO THE EAST ADJACENT TO THE SWEDISH HOSPITAL PARKING STRUCTURE AND THE SIGNALIZED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING YIELD SIGN. BICYCLE PARKING BICYCLE PARKING WILL BE DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT NEAR EACH BUILDING ENTRANCE. BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED @ 1 PER 10 PARKING SPACES 30 BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED (BICYCLE @ 1 PER 15 SQ. FT.) LOWER LEVEL P1-BELOW GRADE 12 GROUND LEVEL 32 LEVEL 2 -ABOVE GRADE PARKING 12 TOTAL PROVIDED 56 THERE ARE NO DOCK-HIGH LOADING FACILITIES REQUIRED BY THIS PROJECT. TWO OFF-STREET LOADING SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE ALLEY; LOADING SPACES SHALL BE 9’-0” X 30’-0” LONG; DUE TO THE URBAN NATURE OF THIS SITE AND THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT, THIS PUD SHALL ALLOW, BUT NOT REQUIRE, THE FOLLOWING ON-STREET IMPROVEMENTS: 1.ALLOW RE-STRIPING OF EAST HAMPDEN AVENUE TO PROVIDE A THREE LANE CROSS-SECTION TO PROVIDE LEFT-TURN MOVEMENTS IN EACH DIRECTION BETWEEN SOUTH PEARL STREET AND SOUTH PENNSYLVANIA STREET; 2.ELIMINATION OF ON -STREET PARKING ON CURBS ADJACENT TO THE SIT E; 3.ALLOW FOR A PATIENT DROP-OFF AND PICK-UP ZONE ON SOUTH PEARL STREET; 4.ALLOW FOR A SHORT-TERM DELIVERY DROP-OFF AND PICK-UP ZONE ON SOUTH PEARL STREET FOR TALL VEHICLES; 5.NEW CROSSWALK STRIPING AT EAST HAMPDEN AVENUE & SOUTH PEARL STREET / SOUTH PENNSYLVANIA STREET. PARKING REQUIRED FOR PROPOSED USES NOTE: FOR THE PURPOSES OF CALCULATING THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES, THE BUILDING AREA MAY EXCLUDE WALLS, SHAFTS, VERTICAL CORES, STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS, COMMON AREAS, CORRIDORS AND BATHROOMS PER PARKING REQUIRED PROVISIONS #5 ABOVE . USE AREA RATIO/SF REQUIRED RETAIL / RESTAURANTS 13,103 (1 SPACE PER 600 SF 22 SPACES OFFICE LOBBY NA MEDICAL OFFICE (FULL FLR. USER)20,934 (1 SPACE PER 300 SF)70 SPACES MEDICAL OFFICE (MULTI-TENANT)18,850 (1 SPACE PER 300 SF)63 SPACES MEDICAL OFFICE (MULTI-TENANT)18,850 (1 SPACE PER 300 SF)63 SPACES MEDICAL OFFICE (MULTI-TENANT)18,850 (1 SPACE PER 300 SF)63 SPACES TOTAL REQUIRED 281 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED PER LEVEL FLOOR HC STANDARD COMPACT TANDEM (VALET) LEVEL P0 0 4 2 2 LEVEL P1 2 51 52 19 GROUND LEVEL 8 35 21 0 LEVEL P3 3 66 28 0 TOTAL PROVIDED 13 156 103 21 293 4%53%35%8% HANDICAPPED PARKING REQUIREMENTS (CONTAINED WITHIN THE ABOVE PARKING REQUIREMENTS) REFERENCE REQUIREMENT / RATIO REQUIRED PROVIDED ADA 2% OF TOTAL PROVIDED 6 7 2015 IBC PER SECTION 1106.3 5 6 10% OF CARE RECIPIENT & VISITOR SPACES: ASSUME 6 OR'S AT 4 PATIENTS / OR / DAY PLUS AN EQUAL # OF VISITORS (6 X 4 = 24 + 24 = 48 X 10% = 5) 11 TOTAL 13 TOTAL No.Description Date MAX BUILDING HEIGHT DIAGRAM Page 68 of 130 PARCEL E PARCEL D PARCEL F PARCEL A PARCEL B PARCEL C ZONING: M1, USE: MIXED USE MEDICAL, OFFICE, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING: M2 USE: MIXED USE MEDICAL, OFFICE, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, LIMITED RETAIL SOUTHPENNSYLVANIASTREETSOUTHPEARLSTREETEAST HAMPDEN AVENUE SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE EXISTING PARKING LOT SOUTHWASHINGTONSTREETEXTENT OF ALLEY TO BE VACATED MEDICAL BUILDING GAS STATION & CONVENIENCE STORE THRIFT STORE ENGLEWOOD FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH PET HOSPITAL SINGLE- FAMILY HOME SINGLE- FAMILY HOME SINGLE- FAMILY HOME APARTMENTS APARTMENTS APARTMENTS SALON APARTMENTS APARTMENTS APARTMENTS SINGLE- FAMILY HOME SINGLE- FAMILY HOME MEDICAL BUILDING MEDICAL BUILDING SINGLE- FAMILY HOME SINGLE- FAMILY HOME SINGLE- FAMILY HOME PARKING LOT GARAGE GARAGE SHEETPlannedUnitDevelopmentSynergyMedical506EastHampdenAvenueDATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NUMBER The information contained in this drawing file is intended for use only on this project. Unauthorized reproduction or use in other projects is not permitted. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no liability for unauthorized reproduction, changes to or use of the information contained herein. The information contained herein as provided on an "as-is" basis. The Mulhern Group disclaims all warranties with regard to the data contained in this drawing file and to the performance of the delivery media, including all implied warranties of fitness. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no obligations or liabilities for damages, including, but not limited to, consequential damages arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this drawing file and its delivery media.Englewood,ColoradoSynergy Medical Planned Unit Development Englewood, Colorado 03 OF 22 EXISTING SITE PLAN GE JC 05-25-2018 15016.00 1" = 50'-0"1 EXISTING SITE-PLAN A PORTION OF BLOCK 3, HIGGINS ENGLEWOOD GARDENS, LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPLE MERIDIAN, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO BUILDING HAS BEEN REMOVED N 0'2'5'10'20' SCALE : 1/16" = 1'-0" No.Description Date Page 69 of 130 Page 70 of 130 Page 71 of 130 Page 72 of 130 WMGMSSSSSSSSSSSSTTSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC4VVCVDNUPDNDNEXISTING TREESCONCRETESIDEWALKSPEDESTRIAN LIGHT POLE (TYP.)PEDESTRIANLIGHT (TYP.)CONCRETESIDEWALKS2-RDL3-GTS10-BLB7-DDY10-BLB3-FER8-DDY11-DDY10-BLB5-FER10-BLB6-GCG10-BLB4-FER6-FER15-BLB4-FER5-CMA3-AFD3-AFD3-AFDBIKE RACKS,RE ARCH2-FERRAISEDCONCRETEPLANTERPRECAST CONCRETESEAT WALLEAST HAMPDEN AVENUESOUTH PEARL STREET SOUTH PENNSYLVANIA STREETPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPEDESTRIAN SIGHT TRIANGLESPEDESTRIAN SIGHT TRIANGLESR.O.W.LINE3-GTS5-BLBGRANITE PAVERSGRANITE PAVERSGRANITE PAVERSCONCRETE SIDEWALKSBIKE RACKSSIGHT TRIANGLESSIGHT TRIANGLES506 E. HAMPDEN AVE.SWEDISH MEDICALLIMIT OF WORKEXISTING OVERHEADLINES TO BE REMOVEDNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SIZE & COND.(UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)LANDSCAPE PLANT LISTCOMMON NAMEDECIDUOUS CANOPY TREESBOTANICAL NAMESUNBURST LOCUSTGLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS 'SUNBURST'3 '' CAL. B&B#5 CONT.ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOODCORNUS SERICEA 'ARCTIC FIRE'DECIDUOUS SHRUBSEVERGREEN SHRUBSORNAMENTAL GRASSES#1 CONT.STELLA D'ORO DAYLILYPERENNIALSHEMEROCALLIS 'STELLA D'ORO'3 '' CAL. B&BGOLDEN COLONNADE GINKGO*,1.*2%,/2%$µ-)68*$¶ 0$/(9$5,(7<21/< #1 CONT.BLAZE LITTLE BLUESTEMSCHIZACHRIUM SCOPARIUM 'BLAZE'3 '' CAL. B&BREDMOND LINDENTILIA AMERICANA 'REDMOND'#5 CONT.LEGENDDECIDUOUS SHADE TREESGTSGCGRDLAFDBLBDDYABRCHIEFTAIN MANZANITA$5&7267$3+</26;&2/25$'(16,6µ&+,()7$,1 CMASHEETPlanned Unit Development07 OF 22506 East Hampden AvenuePROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLANNo.DescriptionDateDATEDRAWN BYCHECKED BYPROJECT NUMBERWBVWH05-25-201815016.00The information contained in this drawing file isintended for use only on this project.Unauthorized reproduction or use in otherprojects is not permitted. The Mulhern Group,Ltd. assumes no liability for unauthorizedreproduction, changes to or use of theinformation contained herein. The informationcontained herein as provided on an "as-is" basis.The Mulhern Group disclaims all warranties withregard to the data contained in this drawing fileand to the performance of the delivery media,including all implied warranties of fitness. TheMulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no obligations orliabilities for damages, including, but not limitedto, consequential damages arising out of or inconnection with the use or performance of thisdrawing file and its delivery media.Englewood, Colorado Synergy MedicalPlanned Unit DevelopmentEnglewood, Colorado#5 CONT.FERNBUSHCHAMAEBATIARA MILLEFOLIUMFERNORTH0201040SCALE 1" = 20'REVERGREEN SHRUBSDECIDUOUS SHRUBSORNAMENTAL GRASSESPERENNIALSQTY.66297026524LIGHTINGEXISTING TREESPRECAST CONCRETE SEAT WALLCONCRETE SIDEWALKSGRANITE PAVERSCONCRETE SIDEWALKS(STANDARD GRAY CONC)(STANDARD GRAY CONCRETE WITH DIFFERENTSCORING PATTERN-TO BE DETERMINED)Page 73 of 130 UP ADA PARKING STALL FLOOR PLAN LEGEND NO PARKING ZONE CONCRETE SIDEWALK LOADING ZONE COMPACT PARKING SPACEC PARKING COUNTXX 9 10 11 D.5 E F F.5 G G.5 30' - 0"12' - 6" PLAN BELOW 2 8'-0" x 17'-6" 4 9'-0" x 18'-0" 2 9'-0" x 18'-0" C C STAIR #2 10.8 ELEV.3 D.4 D.6 E.5 1 1 2 2 3 3 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 1.1 1.1 A B C D D.5 E F F.5 G H J K G.5 1 17 OF 22 10.8 10.8 2.1 2.1 4 4 9'-0" x 18'-0" 8'-0" x 15'-0" 8'-0" x 15'-0" 8'-0" x 15'-0" LINE OF BUILDING ABOVE LINE OF BUILDING ABOVE 9'-0" x 18'-0"9'-0" x 18'-0"9'-0" x 18'-0"9'-0" x 18'-0"9'-0" x 18'-0"9'-0" x 18'-0"9'-0" x 18'-0"9'-0" x 18'-0" LOBBY FLAT PARKING AREA FLAT PARKING AREA PARKING RAMP SLOPED DOWN @ 6.11% PARKING RAMP SLOPED DOWN @ 6.11% STAIR #1 ELEVATORS TELE.ELEC. STAIR #2 ELEV. #3 STAIR #3 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE BIKE PARKING 8'-0" x 16'-6" 9'-0" x 18'-0" 8'-0" x 16'-6"BREAKLINELINE OF BUILDING ABOVE 16 28 8 10 46666642 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C CC C C 3 16 3 Lower Level P2 Level P1 89' - 10" 5' - 0" 3" 3"3"8' - 5"22'-8"8' - 8" 264' - 0" 3' - 9"7' - 9"5' - 0"25' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"7' - 11"4' - 7"199'-0"2'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"29'-8"13'-61/2"3'-91/2"15'-0"15'-0"16'-4"13'-8"15'-0"15'-0"STORM WATER DETENTION UNDER BASEMENT PARKING LEVEL. SIZE & EXTENT DETERMINED BY CIVIL. DAYLIGHT/ PUMP AS REQ'D. FDFD FD FDFD D.4 D.6 E.5 MAINT. OFFICE C C WATER ENTRY ROOM A1.1 3 FD SHEETPlannedUnitDevelopmentSynergyMedical506EastHampdenAvenueDATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NUMBER The information contained in this drawing file is intended for use only on this project. Unauthorized reproduction or use in other projects is not permitted. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no liability for unauthorized reproduction, changes to or use of the information contained herein. The information contained herein as provided on an "as-is" basis. The Mulhern Group disclaims all warranties with regard to the data contained in this drawing file and to the performance of the delivery media, including all implied warranties of fitness. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no obligations or liabilities for damages, including, but not limited to, consequential damages arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this drawing file and its delivery media.Englewood,ColoradoSynergy Medical Planned Unit Development Englewood, Colorado 08 OF 22 LEVEL P1 Checker Author 05-25-2018 15016.00 N 0'2'5'10'20' SCALE : 1/16" = 1'-0" NOTE: EXACT CONFIGURATION OF TENANT STOREFRONTS AND ENTRY / EXIT DOORS WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF TENANT FINISH PLANS. 1/16" = 1'-0"2 LEVEL P0 No.Description Date NOTE: THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND AS SUCH, IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT 1/16" = 1'-0"3 LEVEL P1 Page 74 of 130 DN DN UP DN AT GRADE RETAIL/RESTAURANT SPACE 14,060 SF GENERATOR UP VALET PARKING / DROP OFF & SLOW DRIVING AREA SouthPearlStreetEXISTINGALLEYEast Hampden Avenue PROPOSED ACCESS ALLEYSouthPennsylvaniaStreet TRASH ENCLOSURE 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 111.1 A B C D D.5 E F F.5 G H J K G.5 EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING 10'-0" SITE TRIANGLES 10'-0" SITE TRIANGLES T GREASE INTERCEPTO R ROLL UP DOORS LEVEL 1 / P2 AUTO ENTRANCE TWO-WAY ACCESS DRIVE PRIMARY LOBBY Vest. 10 9'-0" x 18'-0" 15 8'-0" x 15'-0" V BENCHES TO ACCOMMODATE GRADING BIKE PARKING LOADINGPROPERTY LINE LANDSCAPE AREA FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION 100'-0" = 5330.5' U.S.G.S. RAMP 2'-10"1'-7" TO UPPER GROUND LEVEL BOLLARD AUTO ENTRANCE TWO-WAY ACCESS DRIVE DN To P1 1'-0"0'-11" 100' - 0" Outdoor Patio Space NEW LIGHT POLES TYP. OF 4 SHORT-TERM PATIENT DROP- OFF / PICK -UP ZONE, MARKED W/ SIGNAGE PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION SHORT-TERM DELIVERY DROP-OFF / PICK-UP ZONE, MARKED W/ SIGNAGE ELEVATORS 1 & 2 RETAIL ENTRANCE RETAIL ENTRANCE RETAIL ENTRANCE RETAIL ENTRANCERETAIL ENTRANCE POST-SURGERY PATIENT PICK-UP ONLY C 3 8'-0" x 15'-0" 2 9'-0" x 18'-0" 2 9'-0" x 18'-0" 11 9'-0" x 18'-0" BIKE PARKING ONE WAY OUTDOOR PATIO SPACE 3 9'-0" x 18'-0" BIKE PARKING 5 9'-0" x 17'-6" FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE FIRE ANNUNCIATION PANEL NEW LIGHT POLES TYP. OF 4 C C C C C C C C C C C C STAIR #2 STAIR #1 Stair #3 SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER DRIVEWAY PROPERTY LINE LOADING ZONE (MARKED W/ SIGNAGE OPEN RETAIL PARKING 7 9'-0" x 18'-0" 2 9'-0" x 18'-0" PLANTER ELEV. #3 C CC 3 8'-0" x 15'-0"C C REMOVE EXISTING SIGNAGE NEW CROSSWALK STRIPING DN DN FLOOR STEPS ROLL-UP SECURITY GATE LANDSCAPE AREA NEW TRAFFIC MOVEMENT SIGNAGE NEW CROSSWALK STRIPING PEDESTRIAN-SCALED TENANT DIRECTORY MONUMENT SIGN PEDESTRIAN- SCALED TENANT DIRECTORY MONUMENT SIGN PROPERTY LINE WALL MOUNTED LIGHTS 10.82.1 4 BOLLARD TYP. ( 2 )24'-0"24'-0"OXYGEN BOTTLE RM EQUIP. RM D.6 E.5 C C 100' - 0" LINE OF CANOPY ABOVE. T.O. CANOPY @ 14'-7" A.F.F. LINE OF CANOPY ABOVE. T.O. CANOPY @ 16'-2" A.F.F PEDESTRIAN-SCALED TENANT DIRECTORY MONUMENT SIGN PEDESTRIAN-SCALED TENANT DIRECTORY MONUMENT SIGN 20 OF 22 3 VESTIBULE 5' - 6" C EXISTING STREET LIGHT TO REMAIN NEW STREETLIGHT LOCATION NEW STREETLIGHT LOCATION EXISTING STREETLIGHT TO BE REMOVED EXISTING STREETLIGHT TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT DN ADA PARKING STALL SITE PLAN LEGEND NO PARKING ZONE CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPERTY LINE EXISTING ALLEY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE NEW TREES NEW PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS PEDESTRIAN PATH T TRANSFORMER LOADING ZONE COMPACT PARKING SPACEC FIRE HYDRANT PARKING COUNTXX CURB ENCLOSED FLOWER BEDS SHEETPlannedUnitDevelopmentSynergyMedical506EastHampdenAvenueDATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NUMBER The information contained in this drawing file is intended for use only on this project. Unauthorized reproduction or use in other projects is not permitted. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no liability for unauthorized reproduction, changes to or use of the information contained herein. The information contained herein as provided on an "as-is" basis. The Mulhern Group disclaims all warranties with regard to the data contained in this drawing file and to the performance of the delivery media, including all implied warranties of fitness. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no obligations or liabilities for damages, including, but not limited to, consequential damages arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this drawing file and its delivery media.Englewood,ColoradoSynergy Medical Planned Unit Development Englewood, Colorado 09 OF 22 GROUND LEVEL PLAN Checker Author 05-25-2018 15016.00 1/16" = 1'-0"1 GROUND LEVEL N 0'2'5'10'20' SCALE : 1/16" = 1'-0" NOTE: EXACT CONFIGURATION OF TENANT STOREFRONTS AND ENTRY / EXIT DOORS WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF TENANT FINISH PLANS. No.Description Date NOTE: THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND AS SUCH, IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT Page 75 of 130 UP DNUP 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 111.1 A A B B C C D D D.5 D.5 E E F F F.5 F.5 G G H H J J K K G.5 G.5 PARKING RAMP SLOPED DOWN DOWN TO GRADE LEVEL PARKING 3' - 9" 7' - 9"30' - 0"60' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"12' - 6" 251' - 6"2'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"29'-8"13'-61/2"3'-91/2"197'-0"15'-0"15'-0"16'-4"13'-8"15'-0"15'-0"OPEN TO RETAIL BELOWOPEN TO RETAIL BELOW OPEN TO LOBBY BELOW UPPER LEVEL LOBBY OPEN TO LOBBY BELOW 11' - 6"30' - 0"60' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"12' - 6" 251' - 6" C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 28 8'-0" x 15'-0" 8 9'-0" x 18'-0"8 9'-0" x 18'-0" 19 9'-0" x 18'-0" 19 9'-0" x 18'-0" LIGHT POLE LIGHT POLE ELEVATORSSTAIR #1 STAIR #2 STAIR #3 Bike Parking 3 9'-0" x 18'-0"3 9'-0" x 18'-0"3 9'-0" x 18'-0"3 9'-0" x 18'-0"3 9'-0" x 18'-0" 10.82.1 4 FD FD FDFD D.4 D.4 D.6 D.6 E.5 E.5 ELEV. 3 SNOW GATE ADA PARKING STALL SITE PLAN LEGEND NO PARKING ZONE CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPERTY LINE EXISTING ALLEY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE NEW TREES NEW PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS PEDESTRIAN PATH T TRANSFORMER LOADING ZONE COMPACT PARKING SPACEC FIRE HYDRANT PARKING COUNTXX CURB ENCLOSED FLOWER BEDS SHEETPlannedUnitDevelopmentSynergyMedical506EastHampdenAvenueDATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NUMBER The information contained in this drawing file is intended for use only on this project. Unauthorized reproduction or use in other projects is not permitted. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no liability for unauthorized reproduction, changes to or use of the information contained herein. The information contained herein as provided on an "as-is" basis. The Mulhern Group disclaims all warranties with regard to the data contained in this drawing file and to the performance of the delivery media, including all implied warranties of fitness. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no obligations or liabilities for damages, including, but not limited to, consequential damages arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this drawing file and its delivery media.Englewood,ColoradoSynergy Medical Planned Unit Development Englewood, Colorado 10 OF 22 LEVEL P3- ABOVE GRADE PARKING Checker Author 05-25-2018 15016.00 N 0'2'5'10'20' SCALE : 1/16" = 1'-0" 1/16" = 1'-0"1 LEVEL P3- ABOVE GRADE PARKING No.Description Date NOTE: THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND AS SUCH, IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT Page 76 of 130 1 1 2 2 3 3 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 111.1 A A B B C C D D D.5 D.5 E E F F F.5 F.5 G G H H J J K K G.5 G.5 3' - 9 3/32" 7' - 8 29/32"30' - 0"60' - 0"30' - 0"29' - 11 15/16"30' - 0"30' - 0 1/16"30' - 0"12' - 6" 240' - 0"2'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"29'-8"13'-61/2"3'-91/2"15'-0"15'-0"16'-4"13'-8"15'-0"15'-0"18,850 S.F. ELEVATOR LOBBY MULTI-TENANT CORRIDOR ELEVATORSSTAIR #1 TELE.ELEC. RR RR ELEV. STAIR #2 10.8 10.8 2.1 2.1 4 4 D.4 D.4 D.6 D.6 E.5 SHAFT SHAFTSHAFT SHAFTCORRIDORSHAFTSHEETPlannedUnitDevelopmentSynergyMedical506EastHampdenAvenueDATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NUMBER The information contained in this drawing file is intended for use only on this project. Unauthorized reproduction or use in other projects is not permitted. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no liability for unauthorized reproduction, changes to or use of the information contained herein. The information contained herein as provided on an "as-is" basis. The Mulhern Group disclaims all warranties with regard to the data contained in this drawing file and to the performance of the delivery media, including all implied warranties of fitness. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no obligations or liabilities for damages, including, but not limited to, consequential damages arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this drawing file and its delivery media.Englewood,ColoradoSynergy Medical Planned Unit Development Englewood, Colorado 11 OF 22 LEVEL 2 THRU 5 - TYPICAL OFFICE FLOOR PLAN Checker Author 05-25-2018 15016.00 N 0'2'5'10'20' SCALE : 1/16" = 1'-0" 1/16" = 1'-0"1 LEVEL 2 THRU 5 - TYPICAL OFFICE FLOOR PLAN No.Description Date NOTE: THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND AS SUCH, IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT Page 77 of 130 1 1 2 2 3 3 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 111.1 A A B B C C D D D.5 D.5 E E F F F.5 F.5 G G H H J J K K G.5 G.5 3' - 9" 7' - 9"30' - 0"60' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"12' - 6" 251' - 6"2'-0"30'-0"15'-0"15'-0"16'-4"43'-8"15'-0"15'-0"29'-8"13'-61/2"3'-91/2"199'-0"11' - 6"30' - 0"60' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"12' - 6" 252' - 6" MECHANICAL SCREEN ELEV. SCREEN ELEV. PENTHOUSE SHAFT SHAFT SHAFTSHAFT STAIR #1 RTU BOILER ROOM 10.8 10.8 2.1 2.1 4 4 SHAFTSHAFTD.4 D.6 E.5 CONTINUOUS LED WALL WASHER STRIP, TYP. WATER HEATER RM SHEETPlannedUnitDevelopmentSynergyMedical506EastHampdenAvenueDATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NUMBER The information contained in this drawing file is intended for use only on this project. Unauthorized reproduction or use in other projects is not permitted. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no liability for unauthorized reproduction, changes to or use of the information contained herein. The information contained herein as provided on an "as-is" basis. The Mulhern Group disclaims all warranties with regard to the data contained in this drawing file and to the performance of the delivery media, including all implied warranties of fitness. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no obligations or liabilities for damages, including, but not limited to, consequential damages arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this drawing file and its delivery media.Englewood,ColoradoSynergy Medical Planned Unit Development Englewood, Colorado 12 OF 22 ROOF PLAN Checker Author 05-25-2018 15016.00 1/16" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN N 0'2'5'10'20' SCALE : 1/16" = 1'-0" No.Description Date NOTE: THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND AS SUCH, IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT Page 78 of 130 LEVEL 1 / P2 100' - 0" LEVEL 1 / P2 100' - 0" LEVEL P3 111' - 6" LEVEL P3 111' - 6" LEVEL 2 126' - 0" LEVEL 2 126' - 0" LEVEL 3 140' - 0" LEVEL 3 140' - 0" LEVEL 4 154' - 0" LEVEL 4 154' - 0" LEVEL 5 169' - 0" LEVEL 5 169' - 0" ROOF DECK 184' - 0" ROOF DECK 184' - 0" T.O. HIGH PARAPET 198' - 0" T.O. HIGH PARAPET 198' - 0" MID-LVL 1 / MID-LVL P2 106' - 4" MID-LVL 1 / MID-LVL P2 106' - 4" MID LEVEL P3 117' - 10" TRANSFORMER COMPOSITE ALUMINUM CANOPY CMU-1 GROUNDFACE CMU PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM ST-2 MECHANICAL SCREEN WALL WS-1 STOREFRONT SYSTEM PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM ST-1 14'-0"15'-0"15'-0"14'-0"14'-0"26'-0"11'-6"84'-0"COMPOSITE ALUMINUM CANOPY WS-5 STOREFRONT WINDOW LINE OF FUTURE GARAGE LEVEL P4, IF REQ'D. CMU-1 GROUNDFACE CMU TYPE 2 -SIGN AREA TYPE 1 - SIGN AREA 6'-0"60' - 0"2'-0"25' - 9 3/4" TYPE 1 -SIGN AREA WALL MOUNTED LIGHTS WALL MOUNTED LIGHT CONTINUOUS LED WALL WASHER STRIP, TYP. PROJECTING WALL MOUNTED WALL GRAZERS AT EACH SIDE OF BUILDING RECESSES, TYP. (UP & DOWN LIGHT) LINEAR LED GRAZER UPLIGHTS AT SHROUD INSDE & OUTSIDE SURFACES ONLY (NOT ON FACE), TYP LINEAR LED GRAZER UPLIGHTS AT SHROUD INSDE & OUTSIDE SURFACES ONLY (NOT ON FACE), TYP SUNSHADE (OPTIONAL) BUILDING SIGN AREAS: TYPE 1:MULTI-STORY BUILDING WALL SIGN -360 SF MAX ( 6'-0"H) MAX TYPE 2:PRINCIPLE SIGN -80 SF MAX (2'-0"H) MAX TYPE 3:PRINCIPLE SIGN FOR MULTIPLE USES -125 SF MAX TYPE 4:PRIVATE PARKING / TRAFFIC DIRECTION SIGNS -25 SF MAX TYPE 5:ADDRESS SIGN -32 SF MAX EACH RETAIL/ RESTAURANT TENANT SHALL BE ALLOWED 1 SIGN PER STREET FRONTAGE SHEETPlannedUnitDevelopmentSynergyMedical506EastHampdenAvenueDATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NUMBER The information contained in this drawing file is intended for use only on this project. Unauthorized reproduction or use in other projects is not permitted. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no liability for unauthorized reproduction, changes to or use of the information contained herein. The information contained herein as provided on an "as-is" basis. The Mulhern Group disclaims all warranties with regard to the data contained in this drawing file and to the performance of the delivery media, including all implied warranties of fitness. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no obligations or liabilities for damages, including, but not limited to, consequential damages arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this drawing file and its delivery media.Englewood,ColoradoSynergy Medical Planned Unit Development Englewood, Colorado 13 OF 22 SOUTH ELEVATION Checker Author 05-25-2018 15016.00 3/32" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH ELEVATION NOTE: ALL COLOR AND MATERIAL SELECTIONS ARE INTENDED TO COMMUNICATE DESIGN INTENT ONLY. SPECIFIC COLORS AND MATERIALS MAY CHANGE NOTE: THIS ELEVATION IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND AS SUCH, IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT. ALLEY ACCESS ELEVATION 0'2'5'10'20' SCALE : 1/16" = 1'-0" No.Description Date Page 79 of 130 LEVEL 1 / P2 100' - 0" LEVEL 1 / P2 100' - 0" LEVEL P3 111' - 6" LEVEL P3 111' - 6" LEVEL 2 126' - 0" LEVEL 2 126' - 0" LEVEL 3 140' - 0" LEVEL 3 140' - 0" LEVEL 4 154' - 0" LEVEL 4 154' - 0" LEVEL 5 169' - 0" LEVEL 5 169' - 0" ROOF DECK 184' - 0" ROOF DECK 184' - 0" T.O. HIGH PARAPET 198' - 0" T.O. HIGH PARAPET 198' - 0" MID-LVL 1 / MID-LVL P2 106' - 4" MID-LVL 1 / MID-LVL P2 106' - 4" MID LEVEL P3 117' - 10" MID LEVEL P3 117' - 10" REVEAL, TYP. MECHANICAL SCREEN WALL WMP-4 TYPE 1 - SIGN AREA TYPE 2 - SIGN AREA TYPE 4 - SIGN AREA TRANSFORMER PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM ST-2 PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM ST-114'-0"15'-0"15'-0"14'-0"14'-0"26'-0"84'-0"LINE OF FUTURE GARAGE LEVEL P4, IF REQUIRED CMU-1 GROUNDFACE CMU STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM 3 WS-1 STOREFRONT SYSTEM TYPE 4 - SIGN AREA TYPE 5 - SIGN AREA TYPE 3 - SIGN AREA TYPE 1 -SIGN AREA COMPOSITE ALUM. SURROUND WS-2 STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM 40' - 0"6'-0"6'-0"17' - 6"2'-0"16' - 0" 19' - 0"2'-0"1'-11"5' - 10" TRANSPARENCY ZONE CONTINUOUS LED WALL WASHER STRIP, TYP. LINEAR LED UPLIGHT WALL GRAZERS AT INSIDE & OUTSIDE EDGES OF SHROUD SUNSHADE (OPTIONAL) COMPOSITE ALUMINUM CANOPY BUILDING SIGN AREAS: TYPE 1:MULTI-STORY BUILDING WALL SIGN -360 SF MAX ( 6'-0"H) MAX TYPE 2:PRINCIPLE SIGN -80 SF MAX (2'-0"H) MAX TYPE 3:PRINCIPLE SIGN FOR MULTIPLE USES -125 SF MAX TYPE 4:PRIVATE PARKING / TRAFFIC DIRECTION SIGNS -25 SF MAX TYPE 5:ADDRESS SIGN -32 SF MAX EACH RETAIL/ RESTAURANT TENANT SHALL BE ALLOWED 1 SIGN PER STREET FRONTAGE SHEETPlannedUnitDevelopmentSynergyMedical506EastHampdenAvenueDATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NUMBER The information contained in this drawing file is intended for use only on this project. Unauthorized reproduction or use in other projects is not permitted. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no liability for unauthorized reproduction, changes to or use of the information contained herein. The information contained herein as provided on an "as-is" basis. The Mulhern Group disclaims all warranties with regard to the data contained in this drawing file and to the performance of the delivery media, including all implied warranties of fitness. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no obligations or liabilities for damages, including, but not limited to, consequential damages arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this drawing file and its delivery media.Englewood,ColoradoSynergy Medical Planned Unit Development Englewood, Colorado 14 OF 22 WEST ELEVATION Checker Author 05-25-2018 15016.00 3/32" = 1'-0"1 WEST ELEVATION NOTE: ALL COLOR AND MATERIAL SELECTIONS ARE INTENDED TO COMMUNICATE DESIGN INTENT ONLY. SPECIFIC COLORS AND MATERIALS MAY CHANGE NOTE: THIS ELEVATION IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND AS SUCH, IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT. SOUTH PENNSYLVANIA STREET ELEVATION 0'2'5'10'20' SCALE : 1/16" = 1'-0" No.Description Date Page 80 of 130 LEVEL 1 / P2 100' - 0" LEVEL 1 / P2 100' - 0" LEVEL P3 111' - 6" LEVEL P3 111' - 6" LEVEL 2 126' - 0" LEVEL 2 126' - 0" LEVEL 3 140' - 0" LEVEL 3 140' - 0" LEVEL 4 154' - 0" LEVEL 4 154' - 0" LEVEL 5 169' - 0" LEVEL 5 169' - 0" ROOF DECK 184' - 0" ROOF DECK 184' - 0" T.O. HIGH PARAPET 198' - 0" T.O. HIGH PARAPET 198' - 0" MID-LVL 1 / MID-LVL P2 106' - 4" MID-LVL 1 / MID-LVL P2 106' - 4" MID LEVEL P3 117' - 10" MID LEVEL P3 117' - 10" PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM ST-1 PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM ST-1 TYPE 3 - SIGN AREA TYPE 3 - SIGN AREA ZONE OF TRANSPARENCY 3' - 6" 3' - 6"3' - 6" WS-2 STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM ST-2 WS-5 STOREFRONT WINDOW TYPE 1 - SIGN AREA WS-1 STOREFRONT SYSTEM TYPE 1 - SIGN AREA MECHANICAL SCREEN WALL 11'-6"26'-0"14'-0"14'-0"15'-0"15'-0"14'-0"84'-0"CMU-3 MASONRY WALL TYPE 3 -SIGN AREA TYPE 3 - SIGN AREA 6'-0"60' - 0"2'-5"26' - 0" CONTINUOUS LED WALL WASHER STRIP, TYP. PROJECTING WALL MOUNTED WALL GRAZERS AT EACH SIDE OF BUILDING RECESSES, TYP. (UP & DOWN LIGHT) LINEAR LED GRAZER UPLIGHTS AT SHROUD INSDE & OUTSIDE SURFACES ONLY (NOT ON FACE), TYP LINEAR LED GRAZER UPLIGHTS AT SHROUD INSDE & OUTSIDE SURFACES ONLY (NOT ON FACE), TYP SUNSHADE (OPTIONAL) WS-4 STOREFRONT SYSTEM METAL COLUMN COVERMETAL COLUMN COVER COMPOSITE ALUMINUM CANOPY BUILDING SIGN AREAS: TYPE 1:MULTI-STORY BUILDING WALL SIGN -360 SF MAX ( 6'-0"H) MAX TYPE 2:PRINCIPLE SIGN -80 SF MAX (2'-0"H) MAX TYPE 3:PRINCIPLE SIGN FOR MULTIPLE USES -125 SF MAX TYPE 4:PRIVATE PARKING / TRAFFIC DIRECTION SIGNS -25 SF MAX TYPE 5:ADDRESS SIGN -32 SF MAX EACH RETAIL/ RESTAURANT TENANT SHALL BE ALLOWED 1 SIGN PER STREET FRONTAGE SHEETPlannedUnitDevelopmentSynergyMedical506EastHampdenAvenueDATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NUMBER The information contained in this drawing file is intended for use only on this project. Unauthorized reproduction or use in other projects is not permitted. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no liability for unauthorized reproduction, changes to or use of the information contained herein. The information contained herein as provided on an "as-is" basis. The Mulhern Group disclaims all warranties with regard to the data contained in this drawing file and to the performance of the delivery media, including all implied warranties of fitness. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no obligations or liabilities for damages, including, but not limited to, consequential damages arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this drawing file and its delivery media.Englewood,ColoradoSynergy Medical Planned Unit Development Englewood, Colorado 15 OF 22 NORTH ELEVATION Checker Author 05-25-2018 15016.00 3/32" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION NOTE: ALL COLOR AND MATERIAL SELECTIONS ARE INTENDED TO COMMUNICATE DESIGN INTENT ONLY. SPECIFIC COLORS AND MATERIALS MAY CHANGE NOTE: THIS ELEVATION IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND AS SUCH, IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT. HAMPDEN STREET ELEVATION 0'2'5'10'20' SCALE : 1/16" = 1'-0" No.Description Date Page 81 of 130 LEVEL 1 / P2 100' - 0" LEVEL 1 / P2 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 126' - 0" LEVEL 2 126' - 0" LEVEL 3 140' - 0" LEVEL 3 140' - 0" LEVEL 4 154' - 0" LEVEL 4 154' - 0" LEVEL 5 169' - 0" LEVEL 5 169' - 0" ROOF DECK 184' - 0" ROOF DECK 184' - 0" T.O. HIGH PARAPET 198' - 0" T.O. HIGH PARAPET 198' - 0" MID-LVL 1 / MID-LVL P2 106' - 4" MID-LVL 1 / MID-LVL P2 106' - 4" MID LEVEL P3 117' - 10" MID LEVEL P3 117' - 10" TYPE 3 - SIGN AREA ZONE OF TRANSPARENCY METAL COLUMN COVER PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM ST-1 MECHANICAL SCREEN WALL 14'-0"15'-0"15'-0"14'-0"14'-0"26'-0"84'-0"LINE OF FUTURE GARAGE LEVEL P4, IF REQUIRED CMU-1 GROUNDFACE CMU CRASH WALL TYPE 1 - SIGN AREATYPE 1 -SIGN AREA TYPE 5 - SIGN AREA TYPE 2 -SIGN AREA CMU-3 MASONRY WALL WS-2 STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM PANELIZED STUCCO SYSTEM ST-2 WS-5 STOREFRONT WINDOW TYPE 4 -SIGN AREA COMPOSITE ALUMINUM CANOPY 40' - 0"6'-0"6'-0"20' - 0"2'-0"25' - 0" 7' - 5 1/2"2'-0"CONTINUOUS LED WALL WASHER STRIP, TYP. PROJECTING WALL MOUNTED WALL GRAZERS AT EACH SIDE OF BUILDING RECESSES, TYP. (UP & DOWN LIGHT) SUNSHADE (OPTIONAL) COMPOSITE ALUMINUM CANOPY BUILDING SIGN AREAS: TYPE 1:MULTI-STORY BUILDING WALL SIGN -360 SF MAX ( 6'-0"H) MAX TYPE 2:PRINCIPLE SIGN -80 SF MAX (2'-0"H) MAX TYPE 3:PRINCIPLE SIGN FOR MULTIPLE USES -125 SF MAX TYPE 4:PRIVATE PARKING / TRAFFIC DIRECTION SIGNS -25 SF MAX TYPE 5:ADDRESS SIGN -32 SF MAX EACH RETAIL/ RESTAURANT TENANT SHALL BE ALLOWED 1 SIGN PER STREET FRONTAGE SHEETPlannedUnitDevelopmentSynergyMedical506EastHampdenAvenueDATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NUMBER The information contained in this drawing file is intended for use only on this project. Unauthorized reproduction or use in other projects is not permitted. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no liability for unauthorized reproduction, changes to or use of the information contained herein. The information contained herein as provided on an "as-is" basis. The Mulhern Group disclaims all warranties with regard to the data contained in this drawing file and to the performance of the delivery media, including all implied warranties of fitness. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no obligations or liabilities for damages, including, but not limited to, consequential damages arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this drawing file and its delivery media.Englewood,ColoradoSynergy Medical Planned Unit Development Englewood, Colorado 16 OF 22 EAST ELEVATION Checker Author 05-25-2018 15016.00 3/32" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION NOTE: ALL COLOR AND MATERIAL SELECTIONS ARE INTENDED TO COMMUNICATE DESIGN INTENT ONLY. SPECIFIC COLORS AND MATERIALS MAY CHANGE NOTE: THIS ELEVATION IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND AS SUCH, IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT. SOUTH PEARL STREET ELEVATION 0'2'5'10'20' SCALE : 1/16" = 1'-0" No.Description Date Page 82 of 130 LEVEL 1 / P2 100' - 0" LEVEL 1 / P2 100' - 0" B.O. FOOTING 82' - 0" 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 111.1 LEVEL P0 86' - 0" LEVEL P0 86' - 0" MID-LEVEL P1 96' - 2" LEVEL P3 111' - 6" LEVEL P3 111' - 6" LEVEL 2 126' - 0" LEVEL 3 140' - 0" LEVEL 4 154' - 0" LEVEL 5 169' - 0" ROOF DECK 184' - 0" T.O. HIGH PARAPET 198' - 0" LEVEL P1 89' - 10" LEVEL P1 89' - 10" MID-LVL 1 / MID-LVL P2 106' - 4" MID LEVEL P3 117' - 10"10'-2"10'-2"LINE OF FUTURE GARAGE LEVEL P4, IF REQUIRED P-2 P-1 P-3 South Pennsylvania Avenue South Pearl Street 9'-6"4'-0"10.82.1 4 SUNSHADE (OPTIONAL) LEVEL 1 / P2 100' - 0" B.O. FOOTING 82' - 0" A B CDD.5EFF.5GHJK LEVEL P0 86' - 0" MID-LEVEL P1 96' - 2" LEVEL P3 111' - 6" LEVEL 2 126' - 0" LEVEL 3 140' - 0" LEVEL 4 154' - 0" LEVEL 5 169' - 0" ROOF DECK 184' - 0" T.O. HIGH PARAPET 198' - 0" LEVEL P1 89' - 10" MID-LVL 1 / MID-LVL P2 106' - 4" MID LEVEL P3 117' - 10" G.5 East Hampden Ave Alley LINE OF FUTURE GARAGE LEVEL, IF REQUIRED D.4 D.6E.5 SHEETPlannedUnitDevelopmentSynergyMedical506EastHampdenAvenueDATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NUMBER The information contained in this drawing file is intended for use only on this project. Unauthorized reproduction or use in other projects is not permitted. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no liability for unauthorized reproduction, changes to or use of the information contained herein. The information contained herein as provided on an "as-is" basis. The Mulhern Group disclaims all warranties with regard to the data contained in this drawing file and to the performance of the delivery media, including all implied warranties of fitness. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no obligations or liabilities for damages, including, but not limited to, consequential damages arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this drawing file and its delivery media.Englewood,ColoradoSynergy Medical Planned Unit Development Englewood, Colorado 17 OF 22 BUILDING SECTION Checker Author 05-25-2018 15016.00 1/16" = 1'-0"1 LONGITUDINAL BUILDING SECTION- SOUTH ELEVATION No.Description Date 1/16" = 1'-0"2 NORTH/SOUTH SECTION- ENTITLEMENTS Page 83 of 130 SHEETPlannedUnitDevelopmentSynergyMedical506EastHampdenAvenueDATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NUMBER The information contained in this drawing file is intended for use only on this project. Unauthorized reproduction or use in other projects is not permitted. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no liability for unauthorized reproduction, changes to or use of the information contained herein. The information contained herein as provided on an "as-is" basis. The Mulhern Group disclaims all warranties with regard to the data contained in this drawing file and to the performance of the delivery media, including all implied warranties of fitness. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no obligations or liabilities for damages, including, but not limited to, consequential damages arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this drawing file and its delivery media.Englewood,ColoradoSynergy Medical Planned Unit Development Englewood, Colorado 18 OF 22 DESIGN CONCEPTS Checker Author 05-25-2018 15016.00 No.Description Date 12" = 1'-0"1 SOUTHEAST PERSPECTIVE 12" = 1'-0"2 SOUTHWEST PERSPECTIVE 12" = 1'-0"3 NORTHEAST PERSPECTIVE 12" = 1'-0"4 NORTHWEST PERSPECTIVE Page 84 of 130 Existing Alley SWEDISHMEDICAL CENTERSWEDISH HOSPITALPRIMARY ENTRANCESOUTH PENNSYLVANIA STREET East Hampden AvenueSOUTH PEARL STREET EXISTINGPARKING STRUCTUREReconfigured AlleyAutoEntranceTwo-WayAccess Drive GMSYNERGY MEDICALSHEETSynergy Medical Planned Unit Development 550 East Hampden Ave Englewood, ColoradoDATEDRAWN BYCHECKED BYPROJECT NUMBERThe information contained in this drawing file isintended for use only on this project.Unauthorized reproduction or use in otherprojects is not permitted. The Mulhern Group,Ltd. assumes no liability for unauthorizedreproduction, changes to or use of theinformation contained herein. The informationcontained herein as provided on an "as-is" basis.The Mulhern Group disclaims all warranties withregard to the data contained in this drawing fileand to the performance of the delivery media,including all implied warranties of fitness. TheMulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no obligations orliabilities for damages, including, but not limitedto, consequential damages arising out of or inconnection with the use or performance of thisdrawing file and its delivery media.05-25-201815016.00No.DescriptionDateSynergy MedicalPlanned Unit DevelopmentEnglewood, ColoradoSYNERGY MEDICAL8:00AMSHADOW4:00PM SHADOW12:00 PM SHADOW19 OF 21SYNERGY MEDICALN1" = 50'-0"1JUNE 21 8:00 AM ,12:00 PM , 4:00 PM SHADOWSN1" = 50'-0"21DECEMBER 21 8:00 AM ,12:00 PM , 4:00 PM SHADOWSN1" = 50'-0"4MARCH 21 12:00 PM SHADOWSN1" = 50'-0"3SEPTEMBER 21 8:00AM, 12:00 PM , 4:00 PM SHADOWS8:00AMSHADOW8:00AMSHADOW4:00PM SHADOW4:00PM SHADOW12:00 PM SHADOW12:00 PM SHADOWPage 85 of 130 JK LEVEL 2 126' - 0" CURB GRANITE PAVERS CANOPY STREET FACE OF BUILDING RETAIL SIGN SIDEWALK PROPERTY LINE BACKOFCURB1' - 0"6" TRANSITIONAL BUFFER AREA 4' - 0"6' - 7" VARIES 1'-6"GRAVEL PLANTER BED BEYOND 1' - 6"1' - 0"8' - 1" CONCRETE SITTING WALL TO ACCOMMODATE GRADE 5'-0" MIN. TENANT PROJECTING SIGNTENANT BRANDED AWNING TENANT BUILDING GRAPHIC AREA, 50% OF STOREFRONT SIGN 8'-0"NAME MIN.8'-0"MAX5'-0"MAX 5' - 0" S I G N TENANT PROJECTING SIGN SHEETPlannedUnitDevelopmentSynergyMedical506EastHampdenAvenueDATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NUMBER The information contained in this drawing file is intended for use only on this project. Unauthorized reproduction or use in other projects is not permitted. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no liability for unauthorized reproduction, changes to or use of the information contained herein. The information contained herein as provided on an "as-is" basis. The Mulhern Group disclaims all warranties with regard to the data contained in this drawing file and to the performance of the delivery media, including all implied warranties of fitness. The Mulhern Group, Ltd. assumes no obligations or liabilities for damages, including, but not limited to, consequential damages arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this drawing file and its delivery media.Englewood,ColoradoSynergy Medical Planned Unit Development Englewood, Colorado 20 OF 22 DETAILS JC JG 05-25-2018 15016.00 No.Description Date 1/2" = 1'-0"1 SIDEWALK & PLANTER SECTION 1/16" = 1'-0"2 Sidewalk seating wall and grading perspective STREET CONCRETE SITTING WALL GRANITE PAVERS CURB SIDEWALK THE GENERAL INTENT IS TO USE TREE AND SITTING WALLS WITHIN THE 4'-0" TRANSITIONAL BUFFER AREA (4% OF SITE), LOCATED ALONG PENNSYLVANIA, HAMPDEN AND PEARL STREET TO SEPARATE THE STREET AND THE PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK. 1/4" = 1'-0"3 SIGNAGE EXHIBIT 1/4" = 1'-0"4 PROJECTING SIGNAGE EXHIBIT Page 86 of 130 5-29-2018Page 87 of 130 5-29-2018Page 88 of 130 Page 89 of 130 Health Center at Swedish  Neighborhood Meeting August 24, 2017             1. Brook – Explained process 2. Gary Ellerman a. Oriented people to the site b. Self-sustaining project i. Parking Garage c. Turning alley west to Pennsylvania d. Went through site plan and first floor i. Restaurants and shops ii. Lobby and Corridor iii. Parking Garage e. Went through two aerial perspectives Questions 1. Is primary objective medical/office? a. Yes, but also need the retail too. 2. She and her husband want to see retail. One concern is an “old South Pearl.” The development with Sushi Den – the spaces ended up being too small. a. We have 15,000 off-retail space 3. Will there be outdoor spaces? Get more “hip” restaurants in there? a. Patio on West; patio at Northeast corner wrapping the building 4. What building materials will be used? a. Lower 20’ highest quality materials where the people are b. Lots of glass at northwest corner c. Four-stories of pavilion d. Pre-fabricated stucco 5. What about trees? a. Northwest corner potted plants, canopies, trees 6. Security? a. Eyes on the street and good lighting. Building will be like a lantern. Good parking garage lighting. Page 90 of 130 7. Lighting Pollution? a. No lighting on south next to residential 8. How long for construction? a. 15 months, will need to work carefully with traffic b. Mid-late 2019 opening. 9. She thinks this will be a good economic driver and good for hospital. Nice pedestrian friendly. 10. Linda Olson hopes it will activate the area. Page 91 of 130 February 8, 2018 Neighborhood Meeting Sign‐in Sheet Name Address Mark Plunkett 2730 S Washington St Michael Rosenberg 3540 S. Pearl St Kent Lemburg 3470 S Sherman St Cynthia Sainz 3538 S Pennsylvania  Katheryn Bonnicksen 3504 S. Pearl St Daryl Kihen  4715 S Kalamath Niane Argulle  3628 S. Pennsylvania  Leigh Alderton 1035 Madison St Doug Hatfield 3465 S. Gaylord Page 92 of 130 Neighborhood Community Meeting February 8, 2017 | 6:00 PM Synergy Medical Office Building 506 E Hampden Avenue CC2.5 Associates/Gary Ellerman Location:  Directly across from Swedish Medical Center.  East Hampden Avenue to the North  South Pearl Street to East  South Pennsylvania Street to the West  US285 to the South Site:  Currently vacant  Swedish Medical Center on the North  Parking lot on the East  Vacant lot on the West that was formerly Copper Pot restaurant  House directly to the South Proposal:  5-story building with 3-level parking structure  Reconfigure alley which runs north/south. Currently 15 feet wide; proposing to widen to 25 feet.  Re-route traffic to Pennsylvania Avenue  14,000 square feet of first-floor retail, facing Swedish Medical Center  95,000 square feet of state of the art medical offices Parking:  Parking study completed; no associated street improvements needed.  Three-level parking structure; accessed off Pennsylvania  294 parking spaces; all contained on site.  Parking structure will be secure; valet services will be offered.  Craig Hospital and Swedish Medical Center are adding a total of 1,100 parking spaces in new parking structures. Design:  First floor along Hampden Avenue has variable ceiling height. 14 feet high space to 20/22 feet of canopy space.  Kept building skin a light color for a more updated feel.  Pushed envelop on glass  Unique architecture  Projecting canopies are relatively high Page 93 of 130 Questions: Live/work residence on Pennsylvania:  How will parking and traffic affect their customers? o Traffic in the alley will remain the same as it is o Pennsylvania and Pearl Streets do not have alleys When will it break ground?  Goal is late 2018; but there is a lot of work that needs to be done Construction time?  16-18 months Manager of apartment building on Pearl Street:  Pennsylvania is a “tight street.” Project will only increase traffic by re-routing to Pennsylvania. o Currently parking on both sides of Pennsylvania which makes it “tight.”  Concerned about access through the alley. o Access will stay the same; alley will be widened to 25 feet.  Concerned about parking; already lack of parking in the area o The project provides self-contained parking. Parking structure is private parking. o Project is along the bus route, and bicycle parking is provided. What is being proposed for the retail space?  Market will dictate; but vision is a restaurant on either end of building with outside seating. Want to service the hospital and its workers; possibly a designer scrub shop. Which will be constructed first – parking structure or office building?  Unknown; will be decided by general contractor and developer Will there be underground parking?  One level below grade; three levels of parking Why does the property need to be rezoned?  A PUD allows for negotiation. To obtain sufficient parking on the site, setbacks needed to be negotiated.  Code requires 290 parking spaces; they are providing 294 spaces.  The current zoning (M-2) carries a 145 foot height limit; the proposed building ranges from 75 feet – 100 feet in height. Are the plans and designs available online?  No; once a public hearing is scheduled with the Planning and Zoning Commission all materials will be available to the public. What is the size of the building site?  Approximately 200’ x 265’. Is any residential planned as part of the project?  No Page 94 of 130 Does zoning permit residential?  The current zoning permits residential; however, it is not being proposed as part of the Planned Unit Development submittal. Only uses approved in the PUD can be built unless it is amended, which would require another neighborhood meeting and public hearings. What are the next steps?  More detailed, technical drawings will be submitted to the City for review.  When plans are completely reviewed and corrected (if necessary), a public hearing is scheduled with the Planning and Zoning Commission. o Another mailing is sent out o The site is posted with a sign that contains what is being considered, meeting date, time and location o The meeting is posted on the City’s website and in the Englewood Herald o Anyone may attend the public hearing; they may speak in favor or against the project o Planning and Zoning Commission makes a recommendation to City Council. Their recommendation can be for City Council to approve, to approve with conditions, or to deny the Planned Unit Development.  A public hearing is then scheduled with City Council o A mailing is not sent out o The site is posted with a sign that contains what is being considered, meeting date, time and location o The meeting is posted on the City’s website and in the Englewood Herald o Anyone may attend the public hearing; they may speak in favor or against the project o First reading is scheduled with City Council o Second reading is scheduled with City Council. At this meeting, Council votes to either approve, approve with conditions, deny, or refer back to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Page 95 of 130 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Wade Burkholder, Planning Manager Brad Power, Community Development Director FROM: Brook Bell, Planner II DATE: June 5, 2018 SUBJECT: Case ZON2018-001 – Public Hearing Synergy Medical Planned Unit Development (PUD) APPLICANT: The Mulhern Group Gary Ellermann, Architect 1400 Glenarm Place, Suite 300 Denver, CO 80202 DEVELOPER: CC 2.5 Associates, LLC. Jim Hill 8100 E. Maplewood Ave. Ste. 220 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 PROPERTY ADDRESSES AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: Parcel A: 510 E. Hampden Ave. - East 50 Feet of Lots 1-5 Block 3 Higgins Englewood Gardens Parcel B: 550 E. Hampden Ave. - West 60 Feet of Lots 43-50 Block 3 Higgins Englewood Gardens Parcel C: 558 E. Hampden Ave. - East 65 Feet of Lots 43-50 Block 3 Higgins Englewood Gardens Parcel D: 3528 S. Pennsylvania St. - Lots 6-7 Block 3 Higgins Englewood Gardens Parcel E: 3532 S. Pennsylvania St. - Lots 8-9 Block 3 Higgins Englewood Gardens Parcel F: 506 E. Hampden Ave. - Lots 1-5 except E. 50 Ft. of Block 3 Higgins Englewood Gardens PROPERTY OWNERS: Parcels A-C: HCA-HealthONE LLC PO Box 806010 Indianapolis, IN 46280 Parcels D-F: Arculius LLC John Paul Elliott, Manager 3501 S. Clarkson St. Englewood, CO 80113 Page 96 of 130 2 REQUEST: The applicant has submitted an application to rezone the parcels above from M-2 Mixed-Use Medical, Office, High Density Residential and Limited Retail Zone District to the Synergy Medical Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed PUD includes approximately 92,000 square feet of medical office space and 14,000 square feet of first floor retail/restaurant space with a self - contained, covered parking structure. RECOMMENDATION: Case ZON2018-001: The Department of Community Development recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission review the Synergy Medical PUD request and forward a favorable recommendation for approval to City Council. PROPERTY LOCATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USES: The subject property of this PUD is located on East Hampden Avenue between South Pennsylvania Street and South Pearl Street. The property extends approximately 225 feet south of Hampden Avenue on the west side of the alley, and approximately 200 feet south of Hampden Avenue on the east side of the alley. The subject property lies within the M-2 zone district, and is approximately 56,125 square feet or 1.29 acres including the proposed alley vacation. Land to the west, south, and east of the subject property is also zoned M-2 and contains a thrift store, parking lots, a residence, a hair salon, apartments, and a parking structure. Land to the north of the subject property is zoned M-1 Mixed-Use Medical, Office, and High Density Residential Zone District and contains the Swedish Medical Center. PUD PROCEDURE: Rezoning to a PUD requires the applicant to have a pre-application meeting with staff and a neighborhood meeting with owners and tenants located within 1,000 feet of the proposed PUD. After the neighborhood meeting a formal application is made to the City and reviewed by City Departments and any other affected outside agencies. A public hearing is held before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council; following the City Council public hearing, there are 1st and 2nd readings of the Ordinance. If the PUD is approved, there is a 30-day referendum period before becoming effective. BACKGROUND: The Planned Unit Development is a rezoning process that establishes specific zoning and site planning criteria to meet the needs of a specific development proposal that may not be accommodated within existing zoning development regulations. A PUD rezoning provides the opportunity for unified development control of multiple properties or multiple uses. Arculius LLC owns the western portion of the subject property and HCA-HealthONE LLC owns the eastern portion of the property. The developer CC 2.5 Associates, LLC is under contract to purchase the property, contingent upon approval of the PUD. The developer proposes two distinct uses for this location in the Medical District - retail/restaurants and state of the art medical office space. The mixed-use building will contain four levels of medical office over one level of retail/restaurant space. The parking structure will contain one level below grade, one level at grade, and one level above grade, totaling approximately 293 spaces. The applicant is proposing to vacate the existing alley and associated utilities. The utilities and a paved alley will be relocated and turned westward along the south edge of the property in a transportation and utility easement that will be dedicated to the City. The alley vacation and dedication of the transportation and utility easement will require City Council approval. Page 97 of 130 3 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARY: Pursuant to the PUD procedure, the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on August 24, 2017, prior to submitting the application for a PUD rezoning on January 9, 2018. A second neighborhood meeting was held on February 8, 2018 in accordance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) provision requiring that the maximum time between the neighborhood meeting and a public hearing before the Commission shall not be more than one hundred eighty (180) days. Notice of both neighborhood meetings were mailed to property owners and occupants of properties within 1000 feet of the site. Meeting notes for both neighborhood meetings are attached to this report (See Exhibits B and C). CITY DEPARTMENT AND DIVISION REVIEW: The Synergy Medical PUD and subsequent revisions were reviewed by the City’s Development Review Team (DRT) on January 23rd, April 17th, and May 15th of 2018. All issues identified by the DRT were addressed by the applicant following the May 15 meeting and the final Synergy Medical PUD submittal has no objections from any City departments. PUD OVERVIEW: The proposed Synergy Medical PUD relates to the scale of the adjacent multi-story Swedish Medical Center to the north as well as to the urban fabric of East Hampden Avenue. The proposed Synergy Medical parking garage steps down to the south to be more compatible with the residential and commercial buildings to the south and east. The building is set close to East Hampden Avenue continuing the pattern set by existing structures to the east and west. All new and existing utilities within the property and abutting right-of-way will be placed underground. The development is urban in character with a pedestrian scale at the street level. Architectural Character: The proposed PUD contains architectural character standards that require a mix of material pattern and color changes, higher ceiling height on the first floor, and a requirement that building entries be clearly defined with architectural elements. The first floor of the building generally include glass and masonry, while the upper floor transition to panelized stucco, glass, and other metal panel accents. It should be noted that the conceptual elevations and perspective renderings are subject to change; however, any changes would have to meet the Architectural Character provisions of the PUD. Permitted Uses: The subject property lies within the M-2 Mixed-Use Medical, Office, High Density Residential and Limited Retail Zone District. The existing M-2 Zone District allows various residential, public//institutional, and commercial uses. The proposed PUD District Plan includes a table of uses listing permitted commercial uses, which generally include food and beverage services, medical services, office, retail, and associated parking facilities. It should be noted that the proposed PUD District Plan does not permit residential or public/institutional uses. Dimensional Standards: The following table provides a comparison between the property’s existing M-2 zone dimensional standards and the proposed Synergy Medical PUD dimensional standards. Page 98 of 130 4 COMPARISON OF DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES Min Lot Area (sq ft) Max Lot Coverage (%) Min Lot Width (ft) Max Height (ft) Max Retail Gross Floor Area (sq ft) Minimum Setbacks (ft) Front Front Upper Story Setback Above 60 Feet Side Adjacent Street Rear M-2 (Existing Zoning) All Allowed Uses None None None 145 10,000 no more than 10 20 no more than 10 5 Synergy Medical PUD (New Zoning) All Allowed Uses None None None 100 None no more than 10 0 no more than 10 0 Building Height: The maximum building heights in the PUD are based on the average elevation of the finished grade at the corners of the building to the highest point of the building. The maximum allowed building height for the Synergy Medical PUD is 100 feet, although the PUD drawings label the height as being 75 feet to the bottom of the fifth floor. The maximum allowed building height of 100 feet does not include mechanical equipment, which per the UDC, may exceed the maximum building height by 30%. It should be noted that the existing M-2 zoning has a maximum building height of 145 feet. Bulk Plane: The bulk plane that regulates building mass is a function of required setbacks and maximum building height. The existing M-2 zoning has no bulk plane requirements; however, the M-2 zoning does have a front upper story setback of 20 feet for portions of the building above 60 feet. The Synergy Medical PUD proposes no front upper story setback; however, because of the lower maximum height required by the PUD, there is no impact of removing the 20 foot upper story setback in terms of shadowing. Sheet 19 of the PUD drawings illustrates the projected shadows for the building during the winter and summer solstice as well as the spring and fall equinox. Parking: The UDC requires 1 space per 100 SF for restaurants, 1 space per 600 SF for retail, and 1 space per 300 SF for office uses. The Synergy Medical PUD proposes 1 space per 600 SF for restaurants, 1 space per 600 SF for retail, and 1 space per 300 SF for office uses. The reduced parking requirement for restaurants is based on a parking demand projection report completed by Walker Parking Consultants. The report cites the building’s proximity to the 4,200 population base of Swedish and Craig hospitals that are already parked in the vicinity as employees, patients, or visitors. The customer base for restaurants in the PUD will be largely from this already parked population base. The Walker report also cites managed valet parking, and the proximity to RTD routes 12, 35, and the Englewood Trolley. Based on the parking ratios discussed above, the total amount of required parking spaces is 281; the Synergy Medical PUD provides 293 parking spaces. The UDC requires bicycle parking at a rate of 1 bicycle space for every 10 vehicle parking spaces; this would translate to 30 bicycle parking spaces. The proposed Synergy Medical PUD provides 56 bicycle parking spaces. Traffic: A traffic impact study was prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates for the proposed Synergy Medical PUD. The study encompassed the area between Logan Street on the west, Clarkson Street on the east, Hampden Avenue on the north, and US-285 on the south. Page 99 of 130 5 Traffic impact studies use a level of service (LOS) designation to describe operating conditions a driver will experience while traveling on a particular street during a specific time interval. LOS can range from A (very little delay) to F (long delays and congestion). For intersections and roadways in the study area, standard traffic engineering practice recommends intersection LOS D as the minimum threshold for acceptable operations for signalized intersections, and LOS E for movements of unsignalized intersections. The Synergy Medical traffic impact study indicates that after the project is constructed, the levels of service (LOS) for the intersections within the study area will range from A to C. Based on the analysis presented in the traffic impact study, Kimley-Horn and Associates believes the proposed Synergy Medical PUD can be successfully incorporated into the existing and future roadway network. Public Works Traffic Division reviewed the traffic impact study and the City’s Traffic Engineer concurred with its findings. Signage: The Synergy Medical PUD District Plan contains provisions for signage that vary slightly from the UDC. The PUD allows 2 Multi-Story Building Wall Signs per building face, whereas the UDC only allows 1 per building face; however, the PUD restricts the size of such signs to approximately one half of the size that the UDC would allow. The PUD allows Private Parking/Traffic Direction Signs of up to 25 SF, whereas the UDC only allows 6 SF; however, the size and scale of the Synergy building and associated parking garage warrant the increased size for wayfinding. The PUD contains other minor deviations from the UDC signage provisions that are not significant. Landscaping: For commercial mixed-use projects in the Medical District, the UDC requires that 10% of the property be landscaped. This would translate to approximately 5,600 SF of landscaping including 18 trees and 113 shrubs. The Synergy Medical PUD is located within a highly urban context with a significant pedestrian component. The PUD proposes that the 10% landscape area calculation be based on the property located between the building and the curb; this translates to 656 SF of landscape area. The Synergy Medical PUD provides 750 SF of landscape area including 14 trees and 38 shrubs. Staff believes that the pedestrian environment created by the street trees, shrub beds, raised planters, granite pavers, seat walls and pedestrian lights is desirable and appropriate for this distinctly urban location. Drainage: The proposed Grading Plan and Preliminary Drainage Report were reviewed and approved by the City’s Public Works Department. Utilities: The proposed Utility Plan was reviewed and approved by the City’s Utility Department. PUD SUMMARY: The proposed Synergy Medical PUD has been reviewed by the City’s Development Review Team (DRT) and all issues identified by the DRT were addressed by the applicant. The content of the PUD documents comply with the requirements of the UDC; therefore, the Community Development Department recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission review the Synergy Medical PUD request and forward a favorable recommendation for approval to City Council. Page 100 of 130 6 E.M.C. 16-2-8: F. APPROVAL CRITERIA PUD rezonings shall be made in the interest of promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of the community, and shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In addition the review or decision making body shall only recommend approval of, or shall only approve, a proposed PUD rezoning if it finds that the proposed rezoning meets the criteria listed below: 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable use, development, and design standards set forth in this Title that are not otherwise modified or waived according to the rezoning approval. In addition, the proposed rezoning shall meet AT LEAST ONE of the following criteria: 1a. The proposed development will exceed the development quality standards; levels of public amenities; or levels of design innovation otherwise applicable under this Title; The proposed PUD will exceed the development quality standards required by the UDC for development in the M-2 zone district as follows:  The proposed Synergy Medical PUD has more restrictive land uses than the existing M- 2 zone district. The proposed PUD District Plan does not permit residential or public//institutional uses.  The proposed Synergy Medical PUD has more restrictive height limitations than the existing M-2 zone district.  The UDC has no requirements for buildings in the M-2 zone district in terms of architectural character standards that require a mix of material pattern and color changes, higher ceiling height on the first floor, and a requirement that building entries be clearly defined with architectural elements. The proposed PUD includes architectural character standards. AND The proposed development would not be allowed or practicable under a standard zone district with conditional uses or with a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjustments. The proposed development would not be allowed or practicable under the M-2 zone district as it would require multiple Zoning Variances including:  A Variance to exceed the maximum 10,000 SF gross retail floor area by 4,000 SF.  A Variance to eliminate the minimum 20-foot upper story setback for structures above 60 feet.  A Variance to reduce the minimum 5-foot rear setback to 0 feet.  A Variance or Alternative Parking Plan to reduce the restaurant parking ratio from 1 space per 100 SF to 1 space per 600 SF.  A Variance to allow 2 Multi-Story Building Wall Signs per building face, whereas the UDC only allows 1 per building face, and a Variance to allow Private Parking/Traffic Direction Signs of up to 25 SF, whereas the UDC only allows 6 SF.  A Variance to reduce the minimum required landscaped area from approximately 5,600 SF to 750 SF. Page 101 of 130 7 OR 1b. The property cannot be developed, or no reasonable economic use of the property can be achieved, under the existing zoning, even through the use of conditional uses or a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjustments.  It is difficult for staff to determine whether the property could be developed, or a reasonable economic use of the property could be achieved, under the existing zoning, even with the use of conditional uses or a reasonable number of Zoning Variances. 2. All PUD rezonings shall meet the following criterion: 2a.The resulting rezoned property will not have a significant negative impact on those properties surrounding the rezoned area and the general public health, safety and welfare of the community will be protected.  There is no impact from removing the 20 foot upper story setback in terms of shadowing as illustrated on the projected shadows for the proposed building.  The parking report completed by Walker Parking Consultants indicates that the proposed PUD has adequate parking and will not have negative impacts on the surrounding properties.  Based on the analysis presented in the traffic impact study, the City’s Traffic Engineer concurs that the proposed Synergy Medical PUD can be successfully incorporated into the existing and future roadway network.  The pedestrian environment created by the street trees, shrub beds, raised planters, granite pavers, seat walls and pedestrian lights is desirable and appropriate for this distinctly urban location.  The proposed Grading Plan and Preliminary Drainage Report were reviewed and approved by the City’s Public Works Department.  The proposed Utility Plan was reviewed and approved by the City’s Utility Department.  In summary, the rezoned property will not have a significant negative impact on those properties surrounding the rezoned area and the general public health, safety and welfare of the community will be protected. E.M.C. 16-2-8: G.4. COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Commission shall review the proposed PUD and the recommendation of City staff and shall hold a public hearing on the PUD. Following such hearing the Commission may make a recommendation to approve, approve with conditions, deny, or modify the PUD. a. In its review of the PUD application, in addition to any other criteria and findings applicable to the decision, the Commission’s recommendations shall include its written findings on each of the following points: (1) The application is or is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and this Title; The Synergy Medical PUD meets the following Comprehensive Plan objectives:  Objective Work-1.2. The Synergy Medical PUD attracts new businesses to the City that provide quality jobs across a range of skill levels.  Objective Work-1.3. The Synergy Medical PUD increases the value and appeal of Englewood’s commercial and mixed-use districts by supporting and facilitating improvement of the building stock. Page 102 of 130 8  Objective Work-2.3. The Synergy Medical PUD attracts employers providing a living wage, defined as an income sufficient to afford adequate shelter, food, and other necessities of life.  Objective Work-3.1. The Synergy Medical PUD is a mixed-use development that includes both retail and medical office uses.  Objective Move-1.7. The Synergy Medical PUD maintains an appropriate parking supply for mixed-use districts.  Objective Move-3.1. The Synergy Medical PUD provides safe and comfortable pedestrian facilities that are ADA compliant and encourage pedestrian activity.  Objective Shop-1.1. The Synergy Medical PUD attracts retail businesses that provide diverse offerings to residents and workers.  Objective Shop-1.2. The Synergy Medical PUD attracts a mix of complementary retail uses within a key commercial node. The City’s Development Review Team (DRT) reviewed the Synergy Medical PUD and the applicant addressed all issues identified by the DRT. The content of the PUD documents is consistent with the requirements of the UDC. AND (2) The application is or is not in conformance with adopted and generally accepted development standards, and any other ordinance, law or requirement of the City; The Synergy Medical PUD was reviewed by the DRT and is in conformance with adopted and generally accepted development standards, and other ordinances, laws and requirements of the City. AND (3) The application is or is not substantially consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City. The Synergy Medical PUD is substantially consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City as detailed in the Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives listed above. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Synergy Medical PUD Exhibit B: Neighborhood Meeting Summary – August 24, 2017 Exhibit C: Neighborhood Meeting Summary – February 8, 2018 Page 103 of 130 MINUTES Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Tuesday, June 5, 2018 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Cate Townley Daryl Kinton Merc Pittinos Mike Freemire Patrick Madrid Ron Fish Michele Austin Randall Coleman Judy Browne COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Carolyn Moershel STAFF PRESENT: Brook Bell, Senior Planner Wade Burkholder, Planning Manager Dugan Comer, Deputy City Attorney 1. CALL TO ORDER a. The meeting was called to order by Chair Townley at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. Chair Townley stated the May 22, 2018 Minutes should be amended to reflect she abstained when approving the May 8, 2018 Minutes. Moved by Member Merc Pittinos Seconded by Member Patrick Madrid MOTION TO APPROVE THE MAY 22, 2018 MINUTES AS AMENDED. For Against Abstained Cate Townley x Daryl Kinton x Merc Pittinos (Moved By) x Mike Freemire x Patrick Madrid (Seconded By) x Ron Fish x Michele Austin x Randall Coleman x Judy Browne x Page 104 of 130 Planning and Zoning Commission June 5, 2018 8 0 1 Motion CARRIED. 3. PUBLIC HEARING Case #ZON2018-001 Synergy Medical Planned Unit Development Applicant: Mulhern Group Property Address: 506 East Hampden Avenue Moved by Member Mike Freemire Seconded by Member Ron Fish MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING IN CASE #ZON2018-001. For Against Abstained Cate Townley x Daryl Kinton x Merc Pittinos x Mike Freemire (Moved By) x Patrick Madrid x Ron Fish (Seconded By) x Michele Austin x Randall Coleman x Judy Browne x 9 0 0 Motion CARRIED. b. Brook Bell, Senior Planner, was sworn in. Mr. Bell reviewed the case, decision criteria, and answered questions from the Commission. Gary Ellermann of The Mulhern Group, 1400 Glenarm Place, was sworn in. Mr. Ellermann discussed the project and answered questions from the Commission. Moved by Member Mike Freemire Seconded by Member Patrick Madrid MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING IN CASE #ZON2018-001. For Against Abstained Cate Townley x Daryl Kinton x Merc Pittinos x Mike Freemire (Moved By) x Patrick Madrid (Seconded By) x Page 105 of 130 Planning and Zoning Commission June 5, 2018 Ron Fish x Michele Austin x Randall Coleman x Judy Browne x 9 0 0 Motion CARRIED. Moved by Member Ron Fish Seconded by Member Mike Freemire MOTION THAT THE APPLICANT PAVE THE ALLEY FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SOUTH TO US 285. For Against Abstained Mike Freemire (Seconded By) x Ron Fish (Moved By) x Cate Townley x Daryl Kinton x Merc Pittinos x Patrick Madrid x Michele Austin x Randall Coleman x Judy Browne x 9 0 0 Motion CARRIED. Moved by Member Michele Austin Seconded by Member Ron Fish MOTION THAT THE FOURTH LEVEL OF THE PARKING STRUCTURE BE BUILT. For Against Abstained Cate Townley x Daryl Kinton x Merc Pittinos x Mike Freemire x Patrick Madrid x Ron Fish (Seconded By) x Michele Austin (Moved By) x Randall Coleman x Judy Browne x 1 8 0 Page 106 of 130 Planning and Zoning Commission June 5, 2018 Motion DEFEATED. Moved by Member Ron Fish Seconded by Member Mike Freemire MOTION THAT CASE #ZON2018-001, REZONING OF 506, 510, 550 AND 558 EAST HAMPDEN AVENUE AND 3528 AND 3532 SOUTH PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE FROM M-2 MIXED-USE MEDICAL, OFFICE, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND LIMITED RETAIL ZONE DISTRICT TO THE SYNERGY MEDICAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) BE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: 1.THAT THE APPLICANT PAVE THE ALLEY FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SOUTH TO US 285. For Against Abstained Cate Townley x Daryl Kinton x Merc Pittinos x Mike Freemire (Seconded By) x Patrick Madrid x Ron Fish (Moved By) x Michele Austin x Randall Coleman x Judy Browne x 9 0 0 Motion CARRIED. Moved by Member Mike Freemire Seconded by Member Judy Browne MOTION THAT DUE TO THE LATENESS OF THE HOUR THE REMAINDER OF THE AGENDA BE SUSPENDED AND CONTINUED TO THE JUNE 19, 2018 MEETING. For Against Abstained Cate Townley x Daryl Kinton x Merc Pittinos x Mike Freemire (Moved By) x Patrick Madrid x Ron Fish x Page 107 of 130 Planning and Zoning Commission June 5, 2018 Michele Austin x Randall Coleman x Judy Browne (Seconded By) x 9 0 0 Motion CARRIED. 4. Adjourn a. The meeting adjourned at 10:15 PM. Nancy Fenton, Staff Liaison Page 108 of 130 Page 109 of 130 ._.I>._.aozom2Em_u:u__nImmaamEmmu:_u__m:moEEm m:m_m<<oo:_._m_.m_aon _<_m<MA. 83manzozom2Em_u::__o_._mm_._:uémmonEm05cam:u_m<3oa.m553.6 Eu3 _<_m<._._.mo;E88::26a.MS? ._.:>._.Emo_.onm:<Emuuoamommamo:=mu_3.:uomzzmmmzim3::Em :29 23m.ma: _u_mom2Em_u::_.oImmzam. 4:3._...:..m:m38Em_u_m::mn_:3:Um<m_oo3m3u3omo:..m_Em Eouomm:m<:m6< _sma.nm__u:oEmu.m<_m<<m:3EmUm<m_ou3m3m2_2<._.mm3 :um._.Von ._m::mJ.8. >3:3.mg:2.3._m_88. ._.:>._.o:am:m38Em_u_m::moca._um<m_ou3m3u_.onmo:qm_Em muu__om3no:a:n.m:m :m_u::oEooq38%:on>:n:m.M...No.3.vac.8m:o3_EmEm .u:o muu__om._o:on ._m::mJ.0.88.._.:mmuu__om3Emammmoozo:mE:_uoEooa 3mm.Em_um_u_.:m_.<A.~08 3moooamsnm<<_EEmcasma_um<m_oo3m3ooamE09 Eo<_m_o:_.mn:i_._uEm"Em 3mx_3:323mumczmm:Em:m6_Eo_.:oo:3mm._:nmu:m 25.5 :mm_.Emum3_.m Em _u_m::_:oma:Noaam0o33.mmmo:m:m__:2cm3:6Em:30 :m<m.. ._._._>._.EmEouomma_uCU<<___mxommaEmam<m_o_...3m:.n:m_=<m?maumam_.mn:=.maE‘Em C008..am<m_on3m33Em_<_-~Noamgain.mmE__o<<m”..26Eooommom§m§._<_m:.nm__u:_uEmu32m «mmEn._<m _m_.acmmmEm:Em $5.5:_<_-~Noam%=§.._.:muqouommanco DEER Em:qomm:9 um_.3= ..mm_:m3.m_o_.u:c__Q_:mE::o:m_:mmm...:3mEouomm:m<:m6<_<_ma.nm__u:_uEmm32m_.mmEo:<m :33 __3:m:o:m Em: Emmx_m::u_<_-~Noamgags..._.:mcanEmuso..mn::m3m3m3.._u:.E3mm3Em _<_-mNoam :_mEB 3 .m.3m 2 m3:=mo.:.m_n_._m_.mo.m_.mnmaomamEm._.mn::mm3.x 2 3m.m_._m_um=m3ms:oo_o_. nzmsmmm.36:3o..:nE.Eo:Emarm.:3...mu:m Nmn::m3m3Em.o:_E_:o mzamm_umo_mm_._<.338SEm_.o:=mnE«m_m_m3m3m.._.:mEooowmamcoEo_:amm m_.o:=mo.:~m_o:m_.mo"m_.m?msamam. ._._._>._.EmEouommoam<m_ou3m:.<<o:_Q:2amm__o<<m:o_.uamnzomzm5%.Em _<_.mNoam gain.mm.3<<o:_:amo::m3:=_u_mNoazm<m1m:nmmEn_:aEmu.><m.._m:nm8mxomm:Em3mx.3:3Sboommc_.omm$8..zooq m_.mm_u<+8:mm.><m_..m:nm8m__3_:m~mEm3.33:3No-39:uum_.m8«<mmzumnx8..m=:nE:....m m_uo<mmo«mm:.><m_._m:om8_.mo:omEm3.23:3$8._.mmqmmEmox8 o Em"..><m:m_._nm2m=m3m..<mumzaznEm:8qmacomEm qmmnmc?ma _um_.xEu820.133__ mumnmumasomm8Amumomumamoomm. o><m1m:om8m__o<<M3:w.oQ:.___:_8Em.damum?_u dim «mom.sEm$mm Em COOo:_<m__o<<m._um..u:__nEmqmnm“manm<m_._m:nm 8 m__o<<_u1<m~mnm_.x_=m>am:_o Eamozozw_u:mS:u8mmmm.sEm_.mmmEmCUOo:_<m__o<<mmmm..><m:m:om6qmacnmEm3.33:3qmn:__.m:?samomumomqmm 33 mou_.ox_3m»m_< 98:mm8domm.Page 110 of 130 Page 111 of 130 Page 112 of 130 Page 113 of 130 Quasi-Judicial Hearing Form Change of Zoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) INFORMATION Zoning Case Number Applicant(s) Address(es) of property under review Short description of PUD proposal DECISION MATRIX E.M.C. 16-2-8. Criteria for Review. The City Council shall only approve a proposed PUD rezoning if it finds that the proposed rezoning meets the six criteria listed below. To make their decision, the City Council shall rely upon the evidence presented at the public hearing, as well as the written recommendations of both the City’s staff and the Planning Commission. Each line below is provided to allow for the city council to mark those elements deemed COMPLETE based upon the evidence presented. Place a checkmark upon any line which is supported by the evidence presented. By leaving a line blank, a city council is indicating that the evidence presented DOES NOT SUPPORT that the standard has been met. Place a checkmark upon line 6 only if the criteria set forth in either subsection 6(a) or subsection 6(b) has been met. Subsection 6(a) requires selecting (1, 2, or 3) AND 4. Subsection b has only a single standard. 1. The application is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Title 16. 2. The application is in conformance with adopted and generally accepted development standards. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable use, development, and design standards set forth in Title 16 that are not otherwise modified or waived according to the rezoning approval. 3. The application is in conformance with any other ordinance, law or requirement of the City. 4. The application is substantially consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City. 5. The resulting rezoned property will not have a significant negative impact on those properties surrounding the rezoned area and the general public health, safety and welfare of the community will be protected. Page 114 of 130 6. The proposed rezoning shall meet either the criteria set forth in either subsection 6(a) or 6(b) as follows: 6(a) a. The proposed development will exceed the: 1. development quality standards; or 2. levels of public amenities; or 3. levels of design innovation otherwise applicable under Title 16. and 4. the proposed development would not be allowed or practicable under a standard zone district with conditional uses or with a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjustments. OR 6(b) b. The property cannot be developed, or no reasonable economic use of the property can be achieved, under the existing zoning, even through the use of conditional uses or a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjustments THIS MATRIX WAS COMPLETED BY THE City Council the day of , 2018. Linda Olson, Mayor ATTEST: I, Stephanie Carlile, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing Quasi-Judicial Hearing Matrix was completed by the Englewood City Council on the day of , 2018. Stephanie Carlile, City Clerk Page 115 of 130 Quasi-Judicial Hearing Process Change of Zoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) Review Process. 1. Administrative Review. E.M.C. 16-2-8(G)(3). The Community Development Department shall review the proposed PUD, and shall prepare a written report of its recommendations to be provided to the Planning Commission and to the City Council. A copy of the written staff report shall be furnished to the applicant. 2. Planning Commission Review. E.M.C. 16-2-8(G)(4). The Commission shall review the proposed PUD and the recommendation of City staff, shall hold a public hearing on the PUD, and shall make a written recommendation to the City Council to approve, approve with conditions, deny, or modify the PUD. The Planning Commission shall articulate any conditions/modifications it recommends that the City Council incorporate into its approval. 3. City Council Action. E.M.C. 16-2-8(G)(5). The Council shall:  review the proposed PUD,  review the recommendation of the City staff,  review the recommendation of the Planning Commission,  hold a public hearing on the proposed PUD. Following such hearing, the Council may: (1) approve such PUD by the adoption of the same by ordinance by majority vote of the membership of the council; (2) deny such PUD by failing to approve an ordinance to approve such PUD, or (3) return the same to the Planning Commission for further consideration, together with a statement specifying the basis for the Governing Body's failure to approve or disapprove, and requesting modifications based on the requirements of Title 16. No substantial amendment to an application for a rezoning may be made by the Council after a recommendation on the rezoning has been made by the Commission, unless it is first referred back to the Commission for comment on the proposed substantial amendment. If the Governing Body returns the Planning Commission's recommendations, the Planning Commission, after considering the same, may resubmit its original recommendations giving the reasons therefor or submit new and amended recommendations. Upon the receipt of such recommendations, the Governing Body may adopt or may revise or amend and adopt such recommendations by ordinance, or the Governing Body may deny such PUD by failing to approve an ordinance to approve the PUD. Page 116 of 130 Englewood Municipal Code 16-2-8: Planned United Development (PUD) Rezoning Process and Requirements. The PUD Zone District is an alternative to conventional land use regulations resulting in the creation of a unique zone district that offers the City and Applicant forms or qualities of development or amenities not allowed through existing base zone districts. The PUD Zone District combines use, density, height, design and site plan considerations into a unified process. Each PUD Zone District must include its own list of permitted and conditi onal uses and shall identify what development standards will apply. The PUD Zone District is specifically intended to: 1. Provide an opportunity for the developer and the City to review the type and intensity of development being proposed, and to identify any elements of the proposed plan that may not comply with existing City development standards. 2. Provide development opportunities not otherwise permitted within existing zone districts by reducing or eliminating the inflexibility that sometimes results from s trict application of zoning and development standards. 3. Permit and encourage innovative design, flexibility, and diversity in land planning and development. 4. Provide the opportunity for unified development control for a single parcel or multiple properties in harmony with the environment and respecting the context of the surrounding neighborhoods by establishing design and development standards for the general character of the properties within the PUD. 5. Plan for the general configuration of land uses, common elements, major transportation and pedestrian circulation elements, utilities and necessary easements to serve the site and to connect to existing and planned transportation networks, pedestrian networks and utilities. 6. Plan for proposed amenities, such as parks, open space and recreational facilities. 7. Identify natural features of the site that should be enhanced, protected or remain undeveloped. 8. Ensure consistency with the Englewood Comprehensive Plan. 9. Provide for the public health, safety, integrity and general welfare, and otherwise achieve the purposes provided in the Planned Unit Development Act of 1972 as amended (C.R.S. 24-67-101, et seq.). Page 117 of 130 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Eric Keck DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office DATE: August 6, 2018 SUBJECT: July 24th, 2018 Storm Response DESCRIPTION: July 24th, 2018 Storm Response RECOMMENDATION: City Manager Eric Keck, Public Works Director Maria D'Andrea and Utilities Director Tom Brennan will be present to discuss the City's response to the 24 July 2018 storm. The City Manager will be talking to Council about the lessons learned from the storm. The Public Works Director will be discussing the need for mitigation and the strategies surrounding the improvement of the City's storm drain infrastructure for the future. Finally, the Utilities Director will be present to discuss the Oxford storm drain failure. SUMMARY: The storm that occurred on the evening of 24 July 2018 brought with it unprecedented rain and winds that caused serious damage to public and private property. Rainfall assessments indicate that over 2 inches of rain fell in a very brief period of time which, when coupled with damaging winds and hail, overcame the ability of the City's storm water system to manage the water (please see the attached report from the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District). Sheridan Public Works Director Randy Mourning indicated that the rain gauge located in the Bottoms area of Sheridan showed 2.5 inches of rain in a 30 minute span. Rob Hanna, Executive Director of South Suburban Parks and Recreation, indicated that the Littleton Golf Course rain gauge showed 2 inches of rain during this same time period. This climatalogical circumstance has been classified as a 100 year storm event. The City's storm drain system built in the 50s, 60s, and 70s simply was not constructed to manage a 100 year storm. The functionality of the storm drain system was further hampered by hail damaged leaves, vegetation, debris, and the hail itself clogging the inlets to our drainage ways. The bulk of the flooding occurred in the south central portion of the City with the heaviest impacted areas including residential properties on Acoma, Bannock, and Radcliff as well as businesses along the 3300 to 3500 block of Broadway. Several other properties throughout the City were also impacted and we are learning of more as each day goes by. Unfortunately, and tragically, this storm also caused one fatality on the 4600 block of Acoma as well as displaced many residents. The storm also caused the failure of the City's 78" storm drain pipe that flows out of Rotolo Park and into the Platte River. This is the third major failure of this line in the past three years. The line failed due to pressure within the pipe that it was not designed to sustain. Mr. Brennan will address this in greater detail during his portion of the presentation to the Council. The City's first response to the storm came in the form of our police and contract fire departments. It was the heroism of officers Smith and Hume that found them diving into a Page 118 of 130 murky and cold water filled basement to rescue a citizen who was trapped. Denver Fire also responded with their technical rescue and dive teams along with ladder and engine companies to determine if there might be additional citizens trapped in the homes on the street. These are incredible resources that we should feel blessed to have. The first response staff here at the City are second to none. Lessons Learned: While we did have on-call Public Works and Utility staff available the night of the storm, this is where we see that our response and planning for the potential of a disastrous storm fell apart. Quite simply, the City did not have a plan with resources and training set aside to manage a storm of this magnitude. Staff brought this up as a point of vulnerability to the City Council earlier this year when the request for an emergency management position was made. While the City does have an Emergency Response and Continuity of Operations Plan, there is no single point of contact who manages, trains, and updates the staff on the functionality and exercise of these documents. The identification of flooding as a potential hazard for Englewood is well known but the availability of an emergency manager who could help with the identification of resources such as sheltering, recovery, and mitigation activities has not been present. Resources for responding to and recovery from the storm were also not pre-identified, contracted with or staged which would have been helpful as well. Examples of this are restoration companies, roll off dumpsters, and additional street sweeping assets. Since Englewood was the only community hit hard by the storm, it would also have been helpful to have intergovernmental agreements in place with surrounding jurisdictions to obtain storm response and recovery assistance as well. When a storm of this magnitude hits our community, we will require additional assistance as we were quickly overtaken with resource needs. We simply need to have the contacts and resources line up ahead of time to guarantee a smooth response. All of these issues will be addressed in the near future. Second, we found that our disaster communications system was also not up to the task in addressing an event such as the storm that we experienced. The City does not have a disaster communication response system that could call out resources as necessary when a storm first hits. As such, response by departments other than 911 were slower than what was needed to help the rapid recovery efforts. We also learned that we do not have a reliable and clear cut system of speaking with residents impacted by the storm other than going door to door in areas that were known to be impacted by the event. Not everyone has access to a wireless device and the other issue was that there were power outages caused by downed power and communications lines which exacerbated already present difficulties in speaking with our residents. Systems will need to be researched and implemented that will help with our communication to impacted residents and businesses in the future. We also saw very clearly that well intentioned employees and elected officials were communicating with residents and asking for resources that were already being sought and put into play. This redundancy caused confusion and chaos that a well implemented communication plan would avoid. A single point of contact such as an emergency manager and incident public information officer (PIO) would have proven invaluable. A common and consistent response and recovery message could also have been generated by either the emergency manager or PIO and disseminated to employees, elected officials and the public that in turn might have helped to allay frustration, anxiety and fear. While the City has undertaken National Incident Management System or NIMS training within the past year, additional training on the emergency support functions and responsibilities of the emergency operations plan need to take place for a more seamless response. As previously Page 119 of 130 enunciated, the City's emergency operations and continuity of operations plans need to be refreshed. This is a task that a full time emergency manager would be responsible for undertaking and ensuring that all staff within the City understood their role in a host of different types of disasters wherein the City might be vulnerable. Moving forward, it will be a priority for this work to be done to update the plan, exercise the plan, and ensure that all employees and elected officials know their role in the event of a disaster. This will require the dedication of resources and time that staff hopes that the Council will support. Focus on those that are impacted and do so immediately. Many of the staff who found themselves in the position of "accidental emergency managers" focused on the immediacy of determining what was broken from the storm and not on the people side of the disaster. As staff, we have a natural inclination towards action but we must never forget that people were impacted by this storm that needed information, to be heard, to be seen, and to be cared for. We must implement the necessary systems to ensure that task work as well as care for our population are done simultaneously when future events like this occur. The City needs to implement a digital rain gauge system. The easiest way in which to do this would be to participate with the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District system. It is clear to see from the attached report from the UDFCD that Englewood is not well covered with that system. In the interim, I have authorized Director Brennan to obtain and install a digital rain gauge at the Allen Water Filtration Plant. This may seem like a small detail but would be very helpful to have this data for substantiating grant requests for mitigation funds. The City needs to educate our residents concerning the alleys and the necessity to keep vegetation and debris out of the public right of way. Code enforcement within the public and private alleys needs to be increased as many of the conditions that lead to clogged drains were due to the fact that homeowners have not been diligent with keeping the alleys clean and clear of trash and debris. Furthermore, the poor care and maintenance of trees and other vegetation in the alleys which have impaired the safe and unimpeded travel must be dealt with. An article about tree trimming has been placed in the next addition of the Englewood Citizen but enforcement must be put into place as well. The City cannot be responsible for maintenance of private trees that are overgrowing into the public alleys. The most obvious lesson learned from this storm is that the City must allocate the necessary resources to study, address vulnerable situations, and mitigate the conditions that might lead to further disasters in the future. Director D'Andrea will address this in the analysis section of this report as well as verbally on Monday evening. A cursory review of different options on how to prevent flooding from occurring again in our community has yielded the conclusion that the City must expend significant resources to expand our storm water detention facilities. This will require careful study and analysis as well as an increase to our storm water fees that are assessed to each property in Englewood. This will need to be analyzed and brought forward for Council action as soon as practicable. In conclusion, we would ask that the City Council support the creation of an emergency management position immediately. We also would request that the City Council authorize the immediate contracting with the necessary engineering resources to study our storm water system and design improvements that are practical and realistic for our community. We would also request the ability to work with both the State Office of Emergency Management and FEMA on obtaining mitigation grant funding that could help with future projects that will make Englewood more resilient to disasters such as this one. We have been made aware of Page 120 of 130 programs available today at the State and Federal level that we would like to pursue as soon as possible. Finally, we ask for the Council to support staff during this recovery period and allow us to put together an after action report that will be more detailed and introspective than the presentation that we are providing tonight. An after action debriefing will be scheduled with staff once we feel and know that our residents and businesses are well on the road to recovery and that we are certain that our existing infrastructure is repaired and back to full functionality. ANALYSIS: The Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) conducted an assessment of the rainfall that occurred in the City during the evening of July 24th, 2018. This was completed using radar data, adjusted by actual gauge measured data. Their analysis shows that approximately two (2) inches of rain fell in 50-55 minutes between 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. near the intersection of S. Acoma Street and W. Tufts Avenue. Two and one-half inches (2 ½) of rainfall was estimated west of this area, over the South Platte River, during the time period. This amount of rain is equivalent to a 50-100 year storm event. A 100 year rainfall event is a storm that has a 1% chance of occurring in any given year. A rain storm with a two -year frequency would result in about one (1) inch of water in 60 minutes. Englewood, similar to Denver and other communities which have developed since the turn of the century, set aside little to no land to handle storm water runoff. Homes and businesses were built utilizing as much of the land as possible. Low areas which couldn’t be built on were typically deeded back to the city as parks. The city’s storm sewer system was installed in the 1950’s to 1970’s, in conjunction with road paving. At that time, little was known about hydrology and none of this information was incorporated into the design of the streets. So, the current storm sewer system in place is generally able to handle a 2- to 5-year rainfall event. This is very typical of other first-ring suburbs as well as the city of Denver. In 1971, UDFCD, in conjunction with the city, completed a Storm Drainage Plan through the engineering firm of Sellards and Grigg. At that time, it was determined that the city was greatly deficient in protection from storm water runoff and, as a result, ma ny of the Plan’s recommended capital improvements were implemented including construction of two storm water detention facilities. In 1999, the city and the UDFCD worked with the engineering firm of Turner Collie & Braden to prepare an Outfall Systems Planning Study for the entire city. This study identified & analyzed various alternatives and made recommendations to alleviate drainage & flooding problems for a typical 2- to 5-year rainfall event. The cost estimate included in the report (1999 dollars) f or the proposed improvements was $12.7M. These improvements were broken down into five priority levels. It appears that little to none of these improvements have been implemented since that time. The standard for new development in most communities requires properties to detain storm water runoff from their site for a 100-year rainfall event and release at historic rates or whatever the system can handle. This is the same in Englewood where our current design standards require all residential & multi-family developments greater than two acres in size to detain storm water runoff for a 100-year rainfall event and release at no greater than a 5-year rainfall event. Similarly, mixed-use developments, office, commercial and industrial developments that are one acre or greater in size must meet these Page 121 of 130 requirements when site development occurs. However, smaller development sites do not need to meet these requirements. Designated floodplains for a 100-year rainfall event exist for the South Platte River, Little Dry Creek, Big Dry Creek, W. Harvard Gulch and Dry Gulch. Development in these drainageways is regulated by the Englewood Municipal Code. The S. Platte River, Little Dry Creek, Big Dry Creek and W. Harvard Gulch are generally in a natural state or have been channelized to convey the 100-year storm. Little Dry Creek is in an extended culvert from Acoma to the RTD park-and-ride facility near W. Floyd Avenue and S. Inca Street. This culvert is designed for the 100-year rainfall event. Given the frequency of the rainfall events the city has experienced over the past several years, staff recommends the following actions: 1. Undertake an analysis of the city’s current storm sewer system and identify both short- term/immediate and long-term improvements. The 1999 study focused on installing additional or enlarged pipes, additional inlets, and construction of detention basins to provide relief for a 2- to 5-year rainfall event. While these options will be reevaluated and continue to be the focus of the recommended improvements, the analysis will also determine if protection for a 100-year rainfall is possible. By providing detention, downstream peak flows can be ameliorated while also providing for water quality which is a state & federal mandate. Given the lack of available space to provide storm water detention, creative solutions will need to be identified. 2. Evaluate the city’s requirements for new development and redevelopment in comparison with other communities and potentially lower the acreage threshold at which on-site detention is required. 3. Evaluate the city’s storm water utility rates and make recommendations to increase them to cover expenses associated with proposed capital improvements. The city collects a fee for storm water from all properties. Currently, the fees are $16.64 per year for residential property and $0.00554 per square foot of impervious area (rooftops, parking lots, etc.) for commercial properties. In 2017, the collected fees were $405,824.00 with expenditures of $397,714.00. The current fund balance is $1,317,226.00 however monies for the Oxford Avenue repair will come from this fund. 4. Assess available flood mitigation grant opportunities and apply for funding, as allowed. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Staff is meeting with an engineering firm on Monday, August 6 to begin to develop a scope of work for the study. The cost of the study is estimated to be around $250,000. ATTACHMENTS: UDFCD Rainfall Assessment Overall Map of City and Flood Areas Page 122 of 130 July 24, 2018 Rainfall Assessment Page 123 of 130 X Page 124 of 130 July 24, 2018 Rainfall (~1-hour storm duration) Englewood (4600 S. Acoma Street)RainVieux GARR X Page 125 of 130 Page 126 of 130 Page 127 of 130 Page 128 of 130 July 24, 2018 Flash Flood JNews Video Flash Flood Fatality in Englewood https://denver.cbslocal.com/2018/07/25/englewood-flooding-death-rachael-haber/Page 129 of 130 BroadwayDelawareLoganClarksonDowningFranklinFederalSanta Fe DriveZuniTejonRaritanUniversityGilpinLehow WindermereBroadwayHickoryLowellIrvingEv a n s I l i f f D a r t m o u th Pr en t i c e B e l l ev i e w C he n a n go T u f t s H a r v a r d Y a l e A m he r s t D ar t m o u t h F l o yd U S 2 8 5 Ma n s f ie l d Ox f o rd Qu in c y Sta n f o r d Un i o n C h en a n g o Be l le v i ew U n i o n PRINTED: 2018-08-01 12:23 DRAWN BY: JDL ¶N DATE: August 1, 2 018SCALE:1 inch = 3,000 feet Legend FEMA 100 Year, April 2018 UDFCD 100 Year, April 2018 Areas of Probable Flooding, TCB 1998 Page 130 of 130