HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016 Ordinance No. 002.CONTRACT NO. . Iy✓-io) �
ORDINANCE NO . .2:::._
SERIES OF 2015/2016
BY AUfHORITY
COUNCil.. Bll..L NO. 64
INTRODUCEDBYCOUNCil..
MEMBER Gll..LIT
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE FOUNDRY SITE PLAN OF THE SAND CREEK
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) LOCATED THE SOUTH EAST PORTION OF THE
SAND CREEK PUD IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Englewood approved the Sand Creek Planned Unit
Development (PUD) District Plan by the passage of Ordinance No. 5, Series 2013; and
WHEREAS, the Sand Creek Planned Unit Development (PUD) District approval required that
before any residential development was to take place, a site plan for the residential development
would need approval from Englewood Planning and Zoning Commission and the Englewood City
Council; and
WHEREAS, the Sand Creek parcel is a 10.55 acre site fonnerly occupied by General Iron
Works (GIW) for many years, and is zoned Industrial (1-1 and 1-2) since the 1st zoning was put in
place in 1940; and
WHEREAS, RTD acquired a portion of the GIW parcel for its maintenance facility in 2002; and
WHEREAS, Sand Creek acquired its ownership in the GIW parcel in 2010; and
WHEREAS, the Sand Creek PUD District Plan incorporated the Permitted Principal Uses of the
original underlying 1-2 General Industrial District with the addition of residential uses; and
WHEREAS, the Sand Creek PUD District Plan further stipulated that site plan approval for
industrial, office or retail uses be handled administratively, whereas, residential development must
have the site plan reviewed and approved by the Englewood Planning and Zoning Commission and
City Council; and
WHEREAS, the SW Development Group, LLC submitted an application for
the Foundry Site Plan of the Sand CreekPUD for the development of a 2.13 acre parcel located on
the South East portion of the Sand Creek PUD for the development of a Multi-family development
consisting of 70 units; and
WHEREAS, the Englewood Planning and Zoning Commission held a Public Hearing on
November 3, 2015; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the Foundry Site
Plan of the Sand Creek PUD for the development of a 2.13 acre parcel located on the South East
portion of the Sand Creek PUD consisting of 70 units of a Multi-family development 70.
1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Foundry Site Plan of the Sand Creek Planned Unit Development (PUD) located
at the South East portion of the Sand Creek PUD in the City of Englewood, Colorado, attached
hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby approved.
Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 21st day of December, 2015.
Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City's official newspaper on the 24th day of
December, 2015.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City's official website beginning on the 23rd day of
December, 2015 for thirty (30) days.
A Public Hearing was held on January 4, 2016.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the 19th day of January, 2016.
Published by title in the City's official newspaper as Ordinance No.� Series of 2015/2016,
on the 21st day of January, 2016.
Published by title on the City's official website beginning on the 20th day of
January, 2016 for thirty (30) days.
ayor
I, Loucrisbia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by
title as Ordinance No.� Series of 2015/2016.
2
THE FOUNDRY APARTMENTS
PUD SITE PLAN A PORTION OF LOT 1, GENERAL IRON WORKS SUBDIVISION
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M .•
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, ARAPAHOE COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO
VICINITY MAP
SOUTH PLATTf
KDBERT HATS
W Dartmouth Ave
WHom,llof\PJ
A PORTION OF LOT 1, GENERAL IRON WORKS SUBOMSION RECORDED IN BOOK B7 PAGE 25. RECEPTION NUMBER 2609250 IN THE ARAPAHOE COUNTY CLERK ANO RECORDERS OFFICE BE.NG N SECTION 34 TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH. RANGE 6B WEST OF THE S•XTH PRINCIPAL MER DIAN, ARAPAHOE COUNTY OTV OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORAOO BEING MORE PARTICULARLY OESCRIBEO AS FOLLOWS
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNEROF LOT 1 iFOUNO 4 REBAR WITH NO CAP). THENCE SOUTH 89"23'38" WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY ROW LINE OF WEST BATES AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 275 40 FEET. THENCE DEPARTING A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY ROW LINE OF WEST BA TES AVENUE NORTH oo•36'34' WEST A DISTANCE OF 337 95FEET. THENCE NORTH 89'58'0B" EAST. A DISTANCE Of' 277 61 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY ROW L NE OF SOUTH ELATI STREET THENCE SOUTH 00'14'06" EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY ROW LINE OF SOUTH ELATI STREET A DISTANCE OF 335 17 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONT A N'NG 93C.SBSF (2 136ACRES) MORE OR LESS
[�City Office
ffi)I!!
I.II
,.I!'
i�
SITE
W Oartmoulh Ave
Golhic: Thealre 111
El, If Ave
fuil'llffl G(ilch Parll
VI II) i i j:, �!!!E Vale Ave
E O.irlmouth Ave
E Floyd Ave
N EB
NOTE: CODE CHANGES OCCURRING AFTER THE APPROVAL OF THE PUD SITE PLAN WILL NOT REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT TO THE PUD SITE PLAN
CONTACTS SHEET INDEX
MP\C-a�T MD CYffllR $\"i'OEvt.LOPUENf CROUP 1a1a 11TH ST •Xl
C>ENVEft.CO� r303: ee, .. oao sc on'Wt.ATES
flflOPERnOWNER SANCCRttll.1�$10AS UC XlDS ttURON$1 ENGlEWOOO tO 81)110 fLOYO WINSLO'N JR
t1U110N1� �5HOP'iVORl<S ,_RtHl1ECfURf. �WJANDOTST CE.N\lt.111 coeo:211 p (lOJ) AJJ.,4c.,1 CHAONOLTZIHGl:111,AJA l,[EPMJ LANP$CAPf "'BSiH1IfCT CHAISTOPNE� HOY l)ESIGNGAOiiP 3002WALNUl$1 C)ENVEA COea:!05 P (l03145t .711e CHAIS10PHERH0Y Pt.-',CIO CU/II FNGIHfffi ROTH lNGINEEAlNOG,-OUP 78$) EA$1 ARAPAHOE COURT CIEt41EHNIA.l.eoao112 Pf303)141t:>e5 KlvtNA01H PE. LIEEOAP
PROPERTY OWNER
lttHT ffO. , OFt JOFt
30F9 40J!'9
50J'9 SO'lt 70fl IOFt tOFt
IHEE:TMAME CO\lt:RStiEET P1 Of SNIO t1Rl£"-PUD P:or SANO CAHl<.flUD Sll'EP�N G,RM)tNO & Ullt.lTY Pl.AN SUAV'EY C.lN NOTES SUA�Y AL 1N..CSM LAN0$CAPE PL.AH AACKTECTURAL BtJILDNO EllEVA1'10N'$
SAND CREEK INVESTORS LL C A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
BY FLOYD WINSLOW JR MANAGER
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF ___________ _
THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS __ DAY OF ___ _..,. __ 20 __ BY fLQYDWINSLOW JR MANAGER FOR SANO CRE Ell INyESTQBS L LC WITNESS MY HANO AND OFFICIAL SEAL
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
APPROVED FOR THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
PLANNING ANO ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRPERSON DATE
PL ANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORDING SECRETARY DATE
MAYOR OF ENGLEWOOD DATE
ATTESTED THE FOREGOING APPROVALS WERE ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME TH S __ DAY OF ______ 20 BY _________ _
AND _____________ _
ATTEST CITY CLERK
CLERK AND RECORDER
THIS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IS ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK ANORECORDER OF ARAPAHOE COUNTY STATE OF COLORADO AT OCLOCK M ON THIS DAYOF ________ AD 20_ -
:����T60N NO _____________ BOOK NO ___ _
BY ___________ _ 0.ERK ev __________ _
lllEPU1)'
THE FOUNDRY
APARTMENTS' SW OEVELOl'MENT GROUP
:::v ::i • ..L ....
u . L ci .... 0�
. (l_
0
.c
u
Cf) ..... z w
�
�<( a. <( >-0::0 z ::>0 LL w J: .....
1ST SUBMITTAL 2ND SU BM ITT AL
i---�
�zw:I:a.0 ...J w�>"' w�·1
z ::S a..w ..... en
0 :::>a..
2015-09-2B 201!,.14).15
COVERSHEET
1 OF9
THE FOUNDRY APARTMENTS
1
II' "'
~ i
!!: .l
c;Vl~~e~
•
0
~
;(
I!:!
!!!
V,
0 .,
.
"
"lll
Pup LEG•L DEscR1Fr ON
,. P.U:tL o ,� ttWf'flU' " rMC (Kl.'t(;AR• !,it" AD1JSti,tt11 OCQ.WCM1 arcau:i •r flfan� '-"1111'' e:ntet., " ft'( a,111a,,.,.Cl al.Nl'Y Q.Dt• a,t;1 ltf.:::,P•.iors c,ra, w:, ft'l'II.;; a::SCll«O .s rru.or..
A P:Jllf::Jf ti lCI I a._-�A.l .,c,,i �;. �·na(J,I. fit�O � � 6". PAG ,�. af lflQPIU lil,.,:ltit 11't'll)I) � lHl A1t11P,\ttCI �• a,u;:-, NO Jl(C[J,'t(JfS CJIICI, itl\l(; llj, ft'( fr1r011l.,1.S,1 W•IH(A � �(:Toi l,6, �IJ' 4 �lt1. f!M,Q. UI Wl.51 CJ" rte. Sil� �Al .. �'"-Ctr Cl llil�9(1(0, dl&PAH(I( c:n.rr CQ.c,1� rote Iii� .,,.,�.p� T CUCIU:O a.� ,rue�
B(Q!,Nh: Joi f,ff S(l;'"ll(�f a,M«R (J" � \.Qf I, Qt,(ll-'l � ��'S, '!iJB::J�,.::». (l"<L...;> 14 f.t!IAII �l ll'I Ct'ltCJ[T[).
.C.NCC o.t S,.'.l.mO.SI C:JfN.lt Cl � l01 1. GthflAl IPtti 1'IOl:IIS S;M)�� {f:).N. f4 M:lt&II: Sll ti Cl)litCfl(l() WARS It 8'Ml'J,8" £ & tlSlANCt « 7� 64 rrn ($1,� CS IICAhG -&�'j!J .. �•
nc....a AU)IIC it( ne fJ • Cutht lo ,� lltl. et•: c,. bf( fASllfQ.'f RO-I � .. , l'-l rs fl!( ,.,,,.�. l:Jtl'• .. �u rt 11.(. .. oat,. Al!.0 eu.:::; fJh' {,O} ru1 (A$0:flt rl IHJ P.tJilll:J.( .-ru "' atrtn.,u« Cl !.'-ti •T:::t..i�. t�[U a !,&H'& IT ,.'-1,� ...... TltAOIS. ,m-.i: a ttlilhrA,, AJ.:.:..[ (1 �n�·. ,. -� (r !7191:, 11£1. '- Oar:> l!l.tJIWC [J"' TJll"Ot t A m11.11ct tJ'" 1C1Urtrl. � Alt 1.RCtl'i�� rf �6• IHI.
fH[�::l t4 ZC'Jt'Q'" ( Ll)t�fA'<(Nt Mb. th( LA\I DE�O C:ifl,( tlolCl l....:..fNT -.r,. M fQ.tO":; Cl$tltll:l Ctlt� '- t>S-AJ.a C, ?111�ftfl
M....:I --.c,.c � UC Cl A Ql't'.t ro ti( ltlr.lil. l'l<"NC-a Cltrt11Al &NQ.C <:I l•ii1t-e·. 1, •Al11.1\ r:, 11(111:l i:L I & C>OID 8(•1r.tiie 'f Jl't)8"U" ( A D1Sh.11Cf (:J 11 IP rcn AHl "" �: �T��t rT 11.'C J(( I,
�llil:l N �-J6·•·· [ IA'<lllif ., .. hi( ll�f CESOIU� (lJlt>I{ A 0:�f&..cf a !1111!11 rrn,
fHh1C1. 5 �Tll• [ t tr..WKl CJ 26�•1 HIT.
�.a. tMt rcuow...c: fl'lt {�l ��:. -..o-,c. nt l'-';l'l"·' t.H. o �o tor t. t1I1•"-L 11� .,,_s � 11 s oo,,•or C a .. 2•n ., .. t,< rru.o-te � MVC • (l�T.oicr Cf" !ilN rttl r) f'lC.'\11:l Ill),; T,t( All( C'I ,. a.-hc lO 1lt( ,Otl, 1-A-...C ,. alftu,I •..cu [J �•·J.."'lO" .• •.t.:tis CJ •• ,,. li£l, • ""� BCARNC s :tJtor • a DIS�.tH� Cf •�n '1.U. "'¢,.,,. d: ert!&"'IC( rl o" rur l) !Wl«:t S �ie·:-1· ti. l.W:XNl _,t>t 'Hf. LASl [(!.CIUIC '."JIii� A l&l'J.a � 116 )l '1t1. ,, :.-oa s 117n�· •,. cr.;:,.,,'l. o: a:. nn. !-) �lh:C � CO,l'l'" f • CIS.lolli'C( a f,!111111£1 10 'II< s.'.JU,-.[ASI �'llil C, �•0 lOI 1. Ukttrtt -� � !,Ui(ll\•'lQt. <rci:rrc: "ffll'-"9"'"' c.c,.:sicn>.
1H(N(t S n,s·JI• ti. AlC»lt � !iO...'!Htlitt lCT l,.I Of ,_ '· CltOAl IN'� l!Qtf'� S..etlUSt'Jtri A P:Ta"t:( a' 'l444 f[lt t:I JtC:P(JrrjlC,11.c;Jt-..C
�:t) DtSCJeO t.a:u Cf, ... � C!»olUfS o•.•n !.Q rt CJl 10$� &':i[, YrJ!I CJ-l(\S
1071).urt•t-t.
i1. p��l Cf l!YC UXAJt!) N TW" lrtfll 1,·4 'S ti( o t/• C'f �:,to, S4. TOW'_,.,,. t �1!'1t, 11-,.;i UI �SIC, N lf,. t,i, 11(11( ,.Alltnad'.1 DCYJf«' ,4,) ICU� ctJc>QW.C �l l(SI lll( Cf I)( ... '/I IJ � !.{':IOI � A':. !IAPK. CJ s.a:nc,·c A.� ,...,. AH IIUH(:5 C\'11'.-{t: ... IPf .. lli!f'.J.11\( b(fl(T�
� .� H Of'Hlf.Sl aJl\lll U !.10 Y _11:),j }I hll(l '.,[C:;61,1: --� nt: ,ur IN ti !a,l,.:l ... • '4 � �•-·o ,4 a cr,liKJ • rJtUt rtt.1 tC ™I S(Uflil#.11 COJ,.,i(I CJ llf. H 'it (J !.A0 tl1i l 1 4,
h(IQ 118971!11,. �111'\lltt Cl :1t-1t IUI ro .. ,wit Ct, h( U\R1 I.H Cl l)o( flJIUtlCl3'1 ltM.flOAO itott (f�•u ,,�1:11 I◄ '1� (r'{u MJ !J.1>1a rt fl,1,l.110401 � I◄ PO\J ti' ll(e,Nr.r.:;.,
1,11(1(1 -.u,.:. � (�.!t� r llOt�•Cf•HI l,fl( qi)(;. a NCtt-lltQflll t\Jltli{ � D( 1111 ., .. il.lri ,JI,: U"-',,. rJ £.�l "- .. � ll$i1'tt:, tttl. a tt"fRl4-.:ll Cf C,l'l't', MJ A 000 lk•� W:Afi!S .. ,,n:m A �Ilk:£ CJ lOt. fU � t,( �l►ll:;I CC-rrf.t Y' ,...i '· all(Ul 11(:J,1 �\ 9AO-.t'XJI ,s ll[CtlUJI .. 80), , •• tA� n. 'laPfOI .., �t,iO C, , .. ClJJl,ia CUii'• »c Ptto='IU s """"'
nt:N.:t tllflJl&l, A&Dr!C r., !D.Nl\' llil er� t:,1 • • Dir..,.� e1 """ rm •o ,,. r.1t.1r71.?Qil .. ,,. nc lf.o:.n�, ""CJ 'Sil,:� &A..N•:;() Sllt({l (tTCICUJ.
r◄tttt mt1r1•1. �ewe SAC ll(!-111!11., LJrl r, so.;, .. t.A1.u1.z. s�tt c,tt"Cllll • rrs:-..:i rs :, ,; rnr l3-"< J...J.'" .-« rs '..AO 11• 1/4 CJ Jtt 111• 1/• It 5'C� J4.
rHt,JtCl !.tY,]"�•11. A.Ote �O �-.. 1H. ,_ Ml&'ll:l Cl � � fttl to b-4 S.(W1 CJ lllf�
w 1u:r c, ,,....., CDll.urt t r.tl s, <ft t1. ,:,u
THE FOUNDRY APARTMENTS
PUD SITE PLAN
A PORTION OF LOT 1, GENERAL IRON WORKS SUBDMSION
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M .
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, ARAPAHOE COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO
SAND CREEK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
A PARCEL OP LAND LOCATED IN TiiE NW 1:. OF SECTION 34,
T4S, R68W OF 11IE 6TII P .M.,
CITY OP ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OP COLORADO
SIIEl!T...LOF ...L
)
� ' !,
N
t """' , .. ,...,,
BAt,C,RQUNl!
1� �:1 rtt:.fffll r� eoi,tosa: er 1� l,UICl.15. 100,l[C U. 1t( ..oll1W"4:$l (:()11"(11 rs WI.SI 9,1,t(S "" .. :.(· Aitl VIJn+ (!,1,T1 Sflft1 � l.l'il rs h1. (UIUoCIO,., �1Ht'IM SJ,N11, rt t'-'Jlf>,I,.)
101� •tlA 1(111 ft< •Ulttl IS •u;31 7. (WI &P01ttiw,n.n IC>il A(Jl'f5 fl< !il1t ... Dt 1$ o.;ii,,(lilll' c-trD 8T SA.-C CJIICI« ��Slat",.. ll C .• l'i \H:llft� A Qr&�JP l'.l"(IAJ:<::N fllll:.M A Jl«tl)lt ilto,. .-:Yi'K� $Oh«:( lQC.AlfD OI l•C �,r, hf: �n IS ��r., 10@ IIS A Cl"-'"'-ll'()U'SIR:.1,1 tJS:t,(t {1·1}.
1� ruD fc,11 I� Pll�lltl'r "'-l tlPI� IJN..::. A"3 0ClfltJVl:lll $1.u.:l•AUS l>td •t MtC• r(jj � f[lhLl (,�,, l.�S IC'! Pa:,S.a.t r:J""1l. DC\U17'WlMI!. A'C II' •Xlln. "'' ."1) .,,.11 .. hw:l' V".iCS � Of\Ul'.JIV[lrll1 St'-'f:� 1,u.1 ,Ur( �;_.,It Alrtt OJl,f� 10 rtt: �: lf"..tS ti fl( 111(11 M Pl&lrNCJ \Mil DC�(Of'Ml"II U.flUCAtni ljl!.J. (l( fffltS'ln PVR""JJU.l J:, •·< -.?Pt,\CAll( 01, R[l),\&n:trt
G[ll[P.AL NOJCS
l ». Al:-. SUl\'l'.T •'-S lllfPAKt I 811� Lf.l�(lt..c;, COAfUAl:'Jl't A'«) t!i PAIIH Cl be-;. SUE'W 11.t., l I. rtrtu,·�&.11, OfU,1(A.t( �CPC!ll .... PlrCnllfO a, 9.1"..tlt«. (l'!CNt• .. :-; t(J,l,-r1tA110,,, J.N:.) ·� h«l (1 ft-!S SIAUIT.,_ } • 11Ur11C foll'lf!I H'i PitPdllt tr (:l&S,H .. '111( [1,.:»f!'.l,-.C �•lt:tt illrlt IS f.t.llf Cf I� SlWH"-1. 4 IHIS S4rffl'1r OOC!. 9'0-1 LI #if'IN 1. \JC.,t.llt fLOID Pl.AA � Sl.AIDl\(Sl()rt C, M sin !/,Alt a: �Ito UtCi(Jt SfF&UII Dec .. \fljf " :t-1( Ohtlcrft 9-•u Wilfll ,rtH lU &ff'IJ(.ABl( oir an� fi'{a.u,�:. Ni) !.WO� 1 lrl II( l'o\NI (ll 1, Qi,.flJC:1 IITflllh ?tC' !.M:CflC Pfl:l\��S rl fl� ruJ U..1 h�( It 'fl( '",f>(C,(' Ffloa,./S IJ ncs Pl.c !11"'-1 c:::tilr'lt::l
�f.HAI. sm: �· ,, PdQlli)
PUP pt,TR 1CT PL�t� Di:\HOPL,[Nl swm�qDs
• �� UM1SS OIIVfl'� rR<tan '(J.' " fr'( "!fl.� &L 'liCIClMChl f,4£.li!l:,, � WW"l()t,i'S,. S�A'CIAlt:l'S.. l{Q.1,4,ll(:H� &Kl f'fOc:t.OUfl:(S P('11!4(1\11f ro , .. .r,po,J:Al;"..:,4 I c»i- � D(',{�tf111..Nl r:, .lrl() WDffl h'6 PLO let.( h!iffllCI 9-t&U, etui:\• •llto lt4l (1�2 Z::t4 tl)U.,:.l AJ.; 1,c: tlUOt' US.lit> su,c.ur.,s rCF 4'1-lfl ,,..,.�, l.'!l: , ... �:,1�� r:, (1•11 COO:Al •"1.'S�Al CIS'JrlCI CAH Ff JlfJ(llf'-:lJ .. TIIU lb a M' ca (1 [IG(IJIOOO: ._.,,�CFAl (XU
A f'U.JC1t...\!U bC rQ..:.Oii,,t(: V'".AS -"'l f'IAM11Ul I� M SAIC OICI� P,,.11 :OT[ llt.(SS Gl,(11:fl'� �'ClCO 1)1( fQ.IO'M� US[ (ATfGOqU UO h'PfS �Ll,J. 11AIO{ b,[ �.Ila .. , -'Ht.� A$ � (&ll::.OOl « usr n.""5 e, ,�, SJrw "A.lil(S co.1 ..... 0 " nu 1, Cl 1'MI. , .. �OQOO ._.,,..,c-:',,� rax ,r-.-.. ,m V2:S t11t $lil.lCI ro AU �IC4[ ll'[Q.u-:0.� CJ" ncu It - (lola[-OC,: tJ.l"U, t:(-.f°(CS'V[I.I C'rTt
Ffs.tfililf,4! lf.l.S r,()11 v•: uca..rr. 1 -.itU r.;co"" (IJIJJ# �h�"I:. fl .Q..,lt SW"'! 1"'-r.1, [lil[tl'NC. 1c•. wt!lul ,-c ,o oo.�n "Jl n ... l.Hlr pof(U,.c-:. Ml.lll lWt, "Et.II() ,1,111:tlltM'f I.ISL'; !l,IC,1 ,.� l(11�: urict, PhA.rt �:,;1uo. r11a1r,� IIC
....... ,Ct,-'ir.f1,1f.:>1lrl. ,•st� 11�1:t •�u: (:U,tl,f..NTTGAP:l(lt lliUlilT W".1:JW P&h "-oPC• '5P•a: "Ul:::ao..1 llf':.tllJh<.NS �C •�SOOH(tl ACC1�1 lf.J:O: """'" �t1tow1Uo·c.1,� F•� 1, (!,H 0t1Pm1 " 1 ·mrro1••it••"'•""'s. • ,a, A/nl(.'ilf.f uSl-�:•:r: c:..ia'IHl •� SJA<AA::Y.; 10 NQUCt: t.;.flAit•rJC tC1U SPJC� . .U.1Ct1•• ( .. ClO•"� .ltfll.N'O,. !A'.t�:?(l f.lilrf'l ,1,_fttn.l . .,,,_ A'4l(frj�'t &I() TO'f"R S:JIVCh,I{ �A-611 Clt.1[11
ow::1,.,. �"a� v=:.t1,ilClJ�/ti!Jlll'11 tMf"�:, f'\»111. l"VllllR$. QA tiUlt'.1111 $100 &\!',lwa1 t,.&t. r1' AL()f:ftN, l•lll ll(ll;Al fCJI Yf(r,.:s OIi SOC ... O:CA'iiQNS lll!'M((R,-. ('IICWZ•SDI tU0t IN,111,...Wl(Nl/ ,l1111.,""..l .. lttl .tMI.JwtNi (SIACIDWl .. 1 •�,. a».">T�Al \r.l ,..f$1,AI. nn.:ss a,m1tJ!I• 1)(110 &JG P(AfCf,MIHIC(/(:(H(llU .,,: .. �(. "¢1 •0.Ll)llrf:. &DUll lN:'lfllAHlllll a.rrtCRAL IJIJIOO()II A(C9{Arwv.. A� A a,.:,,nc»tal 1,.''J. MOICA�fA().;fT Fr...,:::.,-. JN'iftll.;�, 11r,. t)tl\( • lltlrCIO-�,-..a' 111+#1�"1. ltrinlOIOrt ,ilfltC\lf tllPt\t•rtt#o.,o, SlflWl ro:ti Ali:) H�lfAC( !i'PV.C:C ... !l_tr,..C 801""' (,t,Jl.Jll� .. {lfOOAffl(r. Rl!.IA�.lHI. B.ut 'l'.ld.� •at Clo 1U"'°-1 r.>0QII (,-.(�A?l(:1,1� PC!.U•'-"'.U\11. _., .. {)llfl( � ltfl<IJ"'w" !lllil=t" IUf (l.11 "'-' 0(t,h{Af CK f Wl'X� MG�Nfll(. o."c �l•t t�,1�, (Df .. T"L llllOiCAI. Clt<:l'llCAl! C1rict:Tr1{ct�,1) ctra. 1TH 1(lM,JtD Mr 0..lol�K M<Y'�rrt :'..IR 011. Y !\'Slll'JC.TICJ\A, !,Ct'it:I Pl��1t.&l •r< V'A� !l(:l�� r.lOTOCJIINl �r..Q() oU4":l P-ICl(l !.Ae. t1,o.rtc1t,, P••m•. l0C.IO'.!M;Tt1 IIO"A•�{"il�f1NCl�l:J:u,. lil:1111. SJ.tis Mr¢ SUol.'.l Ull.l Nl,t/Jtl; •tfhU!:l:llt II.II GA.I ftl" a.n-8•�1 Ucc,(l-1<A!oC. Mir?, C(».-'E,;:(M,£N' SICRS. u.-a 9.:T-8.t.�,. !ICCH\-t<I.I(). �l'!l"I, �Wf"l SIMS �•;L C(),IPf"il(t,.:1 �IIJ'tS �llrr,tOAlJlf fOOO $lC,.1 .. ,umct �t� OCltDI �,00:::IOltt ll(T'-' $1.J:S ::ltt!lt"'-WClt'".JtlJ()'c;.r !1-:t Cfl £k/S'fft!S SC,0:)Ql fl..:-0/!Ht"r� DM�_.,�r,+; �I.DO, �-�ca.7;/h.w �.,,. �IC..CI:� r.lfl._.,ct Sil.110'1 (�i:l...._! I &Cl, 11 {:d 11.t.':ili. ,.,;ro DUAt,< ,,,.,, . .,.: l t.�.h. 5m.cT:llii[ 1CA'fll&f .-,.. I'). m.��11.1. \'".J P'-'•».: Al'f-.. �raa (�t.-at ¥1...U.St �� i.. ... ..t ""'" •IIDIH, r•nt<.Ui STA.l
N:t.$:1'."'rr.u .U(S'll �-us NG ,s�eu,u., tO..-STlr&I 711.-ia:,tQol IQ.�1�:.._ �11'11('[, KA� wUUIICl\;Jllh; (tt::I..O'IC t>Hoct:,SJ,;� f,\fM;A'O 0: A�:J••r). ll�!I 111""-lf.l(l\,lil .. :. (�� ft'ott!_.'l,j:_ r1eR1C1.IO, (1i &��W!il.1'), 1(.-� 111:),/-C: A'l:'I �tlUCI: (l.��1,i,2 St�C{ 1&,rn; ICM �l«:l{� tQ;wtr,I, YIIO"AIAI ,-11;,c,, Slr'f't.l\. !t,,::JID-:; COlllll'AJ.CCOII C,J1a .u.(l ,,.r,J •All(�: 11'¢.fllt S1M&:t, ,_a,,� ... 'i,lOIIACI (;()Ill��,.� Sl<:ftlQ: �•:C5 .V,: R{PAllt :JI <ff•.-af �"�J\ W> (�f"'T 1r .. n roi.TN.(:i <J1 t.(1t F•7
lll!i!!
SNfJ CJ!ft« ,-..c:� ll C lC0l S tUla. SI (,.::UIQX>. � ae,1:
&•�t!IC" (fiQt.lfllkC CCJtP TXI 1;1)1 ��-!lilt 11' GODOt t'0�:11
Wt(t HUM',.. AD (lOJ) 1Cl·�l ,117
=:t
Bl!llH: [lf:;»i(JI•: C:,.f 1;r, 11M s;, '!.l.lrt .:10 UUllf, CO�Ol
lfOAH lf.Wlil.11'$, J1 (S0.:)94'J-� .:o
.. ,
$HITT ltfPEX
!.:-.n r, '11-Cfl'DO
CCk/liliYCI� �,��t�i��t������ I,( l,tS
f�f R M'MI, P fC,. �"-r\"lZtlC
t....:...ir..:...0,C"l .. o...,...a_Mniif�
t.tr CCMI_:_» [lHt �'\l!Y�
____ / J.1,,,.J,�j -� •11tsr(�
,.
§
....,.__..., •mm --,,, •.--...... -mc,u:i�• .. r-:i ... ' . , Pl
THE FOUNDRY
APARTMENTS
SW DEVELOP MENT GROUP
� lJ1 Ci
L ; :r :i ..,
� u :L C, .., ;o�
:3 ,, : n.
:0
< :.c t
;lll
u
L
lil
Cl) 1-z w
�
�
Cl. <( >-0::: Cl z => 0 u. w :c I-
\ST SU8MITTAL r�s-,TT�
1-z w�a. 0 _J W"' >,. w� ·1
z ::i a.. w J-en Cl ::, a..
2015-09-28
2015-10-15
P1 OF SAND
CREEK PUD
20F9
THE FOUNDRY APARTMENTS
"1C tlllY MAP
w !' z ·I al :::JJ I WI ~i V) flll
~ 1 a ..
,, -al'O / -PUii ........ ii
'2 -IIISllltll'UII/M>tlmWl.11"8.ll{TIIIU' 6il
Pl -Dl5JIGll1tl'UII "fl
ll4 • CINCD'llJAL tU.M-.1 SITE RM
-
<(
PIID p,sr.:,p Pi 411 OMLDi'YLNT s1•,o•RDS ([Cjll,,,U,Dl •;c&�YWS· IQI( cx:i,,at,()t "� USltJ) fl rt,,Q_(l(d) .. ..-.OP't CtU f.1,.£ II • UMfO Dl"II.L(JV( .. 1CCD ft-cAAR1 It"�� .I.$ l!'a.10 1111 ltr•:tl.:xll .... ff ... cctt fl1\[ ,t, lfirt:i tt'lt.UJ"ll.1111 L.fl �r.irt:i U5CS PP(QQll'(S. f()I APl-i!OY,.._ IJ !.r..lS �I l�:'10 N l� ltlOIII F1'W t"(:- 1l!B �•M.L u. crM.Jl'lrC e.-�T:.t: 11 Pfl�S.CJd rC11 11trstn 1,.� C. ""'"'"N ,,s u· CJ:�rP AU AUCIIO ..:JIJ'illUi \.'Sl� �""' tlil!l NC SltAll hQ 11. ;;:u.1i,:,1.:tt,,t� io o� u::.,,,.. o.cc,t::,i,tr.t. 1.�s � f)( &.i.ua rs " arn.t1c•:t r1 OCC1P•a ,�1 •:Iii �1 -�N1'1A.. Cfl <l.Mil.llClt� 1,."Sl 11pe. � A.O. 111(1)(1 � J'l:T � t,(t!J;'f •Ht Tl( 1,.'UC,_S rf M I\Cl to.&$ ltfli Pl.llttO 7'\W'.fMlhl S'OOM'C",!j l liM,,IHHl Rl�Ht,A;. �tti!•::S a 111••..ct• a.ar..c of(Otl ,�·-� Iii �11•:-s A;,; P\JQ �111.l�S IC, y._• .. 1H.U.t W. 9<&U. llt) t,• C O(k!Jlr. IUnlJU 4� Oll!lt .. c wrs P(I •ett: (•� W '(;flt C HCQIII A,11(,I_IL•H WtOl.lil !:)) Sl)JJJI[ IUI • UUl,t..,U r\CQII N(,\ ti\f.) tO,t I IJlillf.N c,tt, �A:( (IJril:,_,.((.$ !flt•"-,;,} :!.! , ""'""" �01 .,:,111 fOII :�-�(tl)J'Sltl .... e llV'l!CJ·lil0,1 $�&,.;a� TOR «•••UIOl.. ('lo' f0.'S1R;i\• \T.U Sl1"l.J coYF\' •► M. or.ncn.ir"t nc.ur.::.is OJII.ICI r1J1 :)'( \Y.: •-1 11i0-ll'l tt•Q..,_ B:JS!o(�. 1.'C, 1 uc,.t ,0.�111114:.. C'.l'i:ltlC1' to,c, N ttJ Ii. Cl f,( [�.:X:C #0 C(\(l.(J'\llijl CCC( b w•m..V •C:0•1. 1X'•0* c �18J,:r� 1�-c• � AU, v;J.l!t�t.1-� If.iii.�
THEFOUNDRYAPARTMENTS
PUD SITE PLAN
A PORTION OF LOT 1, GENERAL IRON WORKS SUBDIVISION
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RA NGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. ARAPAHOE COUNTY . STATE OF COLORADO
SAND CREEK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NW �. OF SECTION 34, T4S, R68W OF TIIE 6TH P.M.,
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE. STATE OF COLORADO SIIEl!T l .OF _L
ll�"";; • .1.ci;»"..(IE l�lt...,.!itt.-..:.1!1 Ptf:>'l'tl(DA1 t.-CiM..-�a..lJ'f"W. Sirtll'I.� • h�MG • _,,,,...: o.icn,,t� WU • JmAII!, BA'iD Cit rurJRt Dl'dlc»'IOI ilf"1 Alt: .. l l!l s.,a,:� 'fl'IH A 114-'l. !.I� "'"' •'Cl 111.l 1.;Tu .. ,: nu If (t , .. [NQJIIOCD l""Cl [l(\UIJ'lll�l cru A' •• tA5IS 11\tl(:Slt>I (I Ptnfll:: ... , • � fiJil wt, f&IA.f ) P\AU: (#() D(Xa.toG J£11>t'WD,1\ O P�S. 9'.t.aS. .UC: Cf(� 'SP'&Ct 41K, �a �::., $,1,lll Ill 11:tlfl-«.D ll SlPlilUt MJIUr.(NI at tw( (I "4Al S;'!t f'\IJII l f:�""""ctBll S.1!::14U!11:i:5 fh ...:, ljl.it[U-.5 fCII MU.f, 1£11..1 tlO.........C. 2•A;.I. "�ZI Mlli &( .-o.l.i�"t �Jll::A. r IJJlllJQ ,UI) .. Cl.tt'VOElllll " lfOMlu,; kl,l»t,.,"'i !iLWifl:I •s '-Pdl CJ r.c H::,,osl!l JI\() A.II( 0'-"'\1 h<llCIJl""1S IOU-T1'>1C J\I rt,(i.11, Ltl(l r, 0(!3:,t �a.u>1. fltOiS 00 l!lll(lr.A..$ 1::: I( �•ttt t. llo( lltlfCT t I"(.\[(\ (lllllOI: UU\ (jJl{U(R n,..1,11 !.O Hll '4 t0+:ll1 s,.o,,.l) (lilllfu ...,_, f o1.l lll�lttC UtA:l -� D.SUN!ti �11Ct.Jll4 (U..C:111\ � ct�M. ffiJ':..1fi. t,I 1�&:i TRU':'11-.n ;...1.1 ._ �root. U'f SffKJt:a., Ol!.D.11.:ID IMO,.:. r"(.as ctl':Oltt: ro '"' Sfflt[I 'OIi ,ua.c V,,t,(( � PltC'Q: ,ao..ttcu..,, \;,1,11(I' � XAiJ 8• �&l� l,flil!J.TS 20+ � 9'1 .OW... OOOlt•Af".., (N!llw:IS � � 81iitoe t e:c,..a:t_ � ... \{AIIC.Al f'I.W OfltUS. L'O OR[II 11';.S !;I ••�Tl�n.fli\i. Df:1'-l'NC � JlllltO«�Alt,l[lio(Sl 2 �-xoa -. � :no.,_ .I.RO"�:T.--., rt,�s • NaM1ri1ts �,u ...:: El �\-�) IC 11 �, ,.;a . .1.1.l !',1)(5 CJ .I. e,.p,.:; ci-lN 1� vt• Ill' :W ►.-c. N1'411 V..llfD rRQ; P\:DJC � PIIIVIII( �i'r $1-1.t,U CQ\AT .. !Jr..AR l(�:. C, o.:.1ut, .uQ .,,,.llCU..._, r.flttSI AIOlltCll.111.l.. llJ.IIJlllS 9JOt ,1; � ,.,..CS. "3J':n:>ot lthU.$. C,U..<t;;U 9i hlqlt't. 11!>1} ;l!lllf.lSi � II'. U':il:O CJI "1 s:t� rOllt 'Gil.. N':l-.,:.1 'K ta,llilS()f,. (I US!, IO:>ll. � 1(111 S,W.0 II( CAN() ,t::u,o � N: JlhlJ,.IJ U�A:ES :":, � !D #QA(IIR(J fl( tu.:lfrtC !, ru1 •ocrs ll'.iOI- W-111.lll:\ l.:,t n.1 1 0� � $H3.lC ...ow fa,il,P('I) -� �&Al,&.( ,t"Qol .1.11)/l'II (),AJ+ll:!i • �T8.t.('.J. •IM' JlO'i.:.at. �17 il(lt lllt loe:oA.\:l!> TO II �:) IJI P..8.( � r'lr.VA'Jt (IJl"JOCS rl'a£1 • ��, •ocn 111-(frrt 'St� RO(lf'\ AK !..'YC u UST (N CJ � ,ru.� Ult:t.t'j SIO...O 11( �&TUI N� ft( tUD1 NCU.O'!f:; flltOJ:t� t.All.U, � l(lfflZ(».tA1M:•10a. IKU:1. OJ C"•O !ililllll.All '(=a,.z...t:.. l(Xt �,tJ'(� 'lA,ID El .,. fil,:;.11,-. P�t ci � EU1K -■:>tT11.1tl
i .£1·; .: .�
I
! 1· ' 0 J j
I 1: . ,, ,' < ;
-. ::-:·-�· '
NCI i,it,'1[ 111t11tSl,w; "� ,.I.IIU ""l-...w:n !I 811lCNT ..3<1tS IIIT'ffll':I 8'1(»4T rJo fl�l�<tl CCI� !JOID PtOT It tlSI.C l'; I"{ �,_.• a:u;,i ;J, ""' uu. � 11:oc, <S .u., f'IWll'-'l c,i •<.a::so11 sffll.Cr.A , ui;..c untl4S orcu � u;tas -s,c;:ut> (itel ttC>I thW, rs 11:'5.tJt Df:t.1,u<.. Ahl: ll.l.llJUI. 1-.:...n A IH c, lf:)1 :)JAC� a»'Jl!(kf ll.llUl,,\l,.S 15 s�, ["l�•:X:, ._ .Ill rl(AAS r� 1t11Ell\. 0A CMA JILtu:' !.".as cs; HO'S. fU.c»Ci StOAC 8( �fflU(lr: � tuua.t. �o..&l·., 111o1.�Jfl1.LS !ii.IC,. •t l!IIO' s�. UQ-4RtU41. Nt us: CIJr,:Jll.Tt. d!OtlltTJl .. i, CAS'f �rr UST SlOC.. N�::tt.m Clef'(� 9\)1 Ui C,0...,t() u.a C1)0(11( --•s.'.Jf!r \NI\, \U:X:O C, fft, {t11EA-(ft ........ un.:> fk�tt... S\'\Rlllj. �,r,u .. IJCT•L -0:::C "' 'SC)tf;.. t11 '"'" [t'MQlll&n.)I or fl( .i•�"� �m 1 �::\r�tt:��� �.�'".:ou=i'l�:,Dcrc�n � ��� � ••ff""-il..S Cl Yd'!Wi; OfP"- f.> Nl(l.,q 'A".il.11 Pt:tli!SI • �n ►J,N t(',UQPV[.kl Qt,. &NI KJIIDI CJ hC P,.O fQII Uril RlSQ.flllU.. •·!I a,.:> "I:. P.8.1:/Mf,M'Dt.t.l. C� i,: �SSl!l4 !;SO,} !,)la.,:. • S.UCI JO �� ft\..,_ 11£'.C• tr l\,( 1\.1.....C .U.) i:JrttiiC, C..-,SSD, ii() f!l.'i"\'I AA:) l�A:. Bf ClT c:o,.(:l If Ut S;1[ P'�l!i 1$ �llltl f(lll 111.8.IC/MfliJJD.AL.. C'('IAl(;QAL. U1 Nl:SlPAt. U".Jt. 11 Ill.. eE Nie(;(�� �•:uh(U "5 Al.11711fJl BT n( VNJf't) �Y{ Chl(l.1 Wf
o. �flll(t f'l.>ij ht: TUl'VS.. c:JOIW-•· A)(IIIIO �.tJ O::l"tt A...,. •I(; CWXIN!�rs lilt■ 11 OIA<ra"f:I U..J� All(IO[tl 'It �3! CJt N ,u:1 '-!i rwo.r. tilO IKDIC-"00'6 fO ttf{ '1.:!> 1>$-1 1\,\11. I◄ Oil w�cc, Cfl W'SMR tlSDL[ 111•• Al'HIO-t iatc,t 111:DfiC.a.'"6., TM. 10C•10t s.,--,.::.. &IC '4:Qtl o !tll\JCl;lll'!. 0A f&Wtl"I f II:(� 91 (�[11:C [Jt Cl'tt:, Ut:'Jll�f&IIIC:tS 111:1 f�(S(h •t T""- lllf. It( Pin t'IS,M:1 Pi,•� •l.. APCMtO\to uv, �•11::HS ;11a.... ...Cl (I[ fl't'YI� r l>f r.,�b lll'2U'i" .u.r a tt< Qll��1»u� �ru:-. ( U,. CJ 1� tW • ltllA..l:f �l(&t'1fS 10 M F\D b�JR::: f'lA!t lll.DI v;Xll(A110ti� UAT I: Ii-ii t0 14 J.U'tO'if:I P\,."O ()SM! r.• ,.,....U..,.l 10 11,( S,l,YC 1uto1.t-� ol,'(l kf:3 ... 111 .. n {If-� f'r.ili<. � 000.tl("lt all{ 0t-:.11.AUf �C\t:i • !.In l't>.t. I 11..:.f .:IVICA!lOtS t0 1,< fl\O 9tt "'-&it M. Off 11olt0.0• tt< [{\II cnlllilf fl ..... ltililll. '110 J.llkl.jll![ [{'o1al0f'!, tl:M lo( P'.,0 !lit: P!_ol,"I "" 9,rC)o [.(\•A� &llf'(AR t,(t:(_!,!,J,11� 11 u· 'S l{O,.C.1.,. (:,; [� o:>i�:C,(ht::t,� ..-0 t(�at.(lfS �•-'Ll. �l ll
l'O'IITll� #ltt" MOIC.#i�S'1CU. o , c,i,r.r.,, • 1tC 1gnh,1,l(lt '$ 1M Dhll'�'I <»I ► .1on...:a: 1111-<rw:l!f.NC-n:!...cJJ J,OWQ ... �� 1()'4,U.:IIIMQW:!. � •� ...OC'-!1 ai ft(..,...,. '(IQllt rs,...,....,. rs illll .. t� )'\. tr ». NCll(A7 ft M � tt l!<,(u(, l,l;n,. !'.I' • � ,JilXl IJ M. � I o,.., ,... CS smx.Ut:\ ;� lllf l&.IIE> ... � IMIIIJ71111 W r•CJ'O"J'� i;a:01.:: llm:t' �A #1)9. AAl 1"'11111Cl.\lfll' ill(lr.[ 11'-.;J( f�:;'\ � I .I. t(:J.(?(J. h � na.c'l.• IICl'f T•MI I� t# , &.'II K.Jl(a� a..-� trt. w CJ'l"iJCa c:Nh:i t, s11t1JCn .. •u Qj' !.LM•a f' ..... 1,-:: OIi 11 •IIUUCb&Y� Jt,11o\,,., 1tCIJ'IC!•l.u0C�",fc,111>1r(UIIM � • �'TOI a IOI i-... !,,; .. ltt! h.11() <1 ..,.. ··-' rlH1'1 .. NO \�:>ft,. �f<a 10 at� r1aF 11.'f• � ...,,_a rJ C1(u.N.1.1t:t\ • srn Pl,... ... �"Olllril'!i Itel-�-: J-t; �tl(lill. �O .... llil• " "-"' 9ii i\lM �o\O U.:: ll(C:::,CO IUT °' T K ��Ill,� ?K' � l.llfl&U,. 1'4 ll(l;l,IP[l4,•l".i tr �w:;Ml'\.lll';lll:11(.......,...,
( H�' r� �" PC �i I/' U1� C: " �
l' '>-�zj ;� C. � g g I � ..,u 0 i!::: � a z .. ,..::, �� O jli o �-1,!
�§; a. ':,:: � w I w i"" u �S! ... < .� V'I ::: I!,
5 --=-,,--
___ ..,. ----...... -..1 --Jr• •. --...... ----:ta_t'tf.;t.-•'-1 " ... -... � .c
THE FOUNDRY
APARTMENTS
SW C!'E\11£\.0l)�tlf OROIH'
u .Lc.
u
. n.
:0 . ,.C
Cl) I-z w � I-0::: <( a.. <( >-0::: 0 z ::J 0
w I I-
I ,s1 S11eM1"AL �S\18MITTAl
• t
� z w l: a. 0 ...J wo. >" w� ·1
z ::i a_ w
I-en 0 ::> a_
201�1).28 2015 .. \0-15
P20F SAND
CREEK PUD
30F9
THE FOUNDRY APARTMENTS
L
~ lfl " ., ...
lllSNJCT PUii I ARauracnllAt IMAOFJ 4 DBTW
Wj ;y ~
·1 Z ---f 1. ...
..J E: a ; ~ll f ·I Ill!
3 ~ ; 5-
11
~Ii 0 I!. z
i:2 w
Wi:,..
'l l ~ l ::z:?: ::i p I ~ p !-<QO o:z ci:: ,~ ci::wo f ~ t~· ~ a ~,; ~ ".:. ~ l/1 " ,~~ t ~
u..
.-
B" I -~ I a . ,«
i-.. !1 . ! j
~t ~ '
:, I
~ .. ll\,\TI-r.11111.T Al<Ol1£CMM. CICAIIPUS
.r.1,r,, l•-,i.t
' ~ . ·•:.
• ZOIIING Pt.lb
CURR(NT USE
VACA.Hf
OAS.HCD LltftS
INDICAtc
PAOJ(C11NOWAUS Aru:vcu:u,
txT(lh()lt PAYICU,T
U.Yf.l I O(CK
A90W. AT L(V[\)
!
' .. r
0 :
I!
~
,i
:I
I"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
r
(
\
l!IUIUINJMEA ■
tlUlt,.0INC ARl:4 JOOtP"8NT
GltOU flCX>R MICA
OVERALL BUJLDlNG
).$10'1T IUI.CU«;
C.OHSTRUCtJOH f'n'f VA
OC.C.uP~NCY llt2RESIIXNJIA.
b
It
I,
THEFOUNDRYAPARTMENTS
PUO SITE PLAN
A PORTION OF LOT 1, GENERAL IRON WORKS SUBDIVISION
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH. RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P M ,
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, ARAPAHOE COUNTY , STATE OF COLORADO
IHOWSTOAJ.Cl
lOCATIOHS AT
11lAH0$1WOI~
0£TlNllONMlt.A 111tf CIVIi.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ZO-tG PUO
Ulutf.Nl .[
.·ACAHT
~PAAMJlolC
(K1(llh011 PUt
l.>,Ht,$CAP(Pt.AM
I SP.t.(.($
'"' O'
-·-1c,t•(ltf~1"-R
LAHDICAPf.P\.AN
tn\PACU
V
9M.£S-.QRAGf
IHT[AIOA1
lll,l,P A(.£1
TSIANS
f lJIIU,,tCR
BUILDING ARl!AA
.llTOflYIUll.0-.G
eour•uctK>H 1'l'H v a.
OCCUPAHCY ltllll[SID(HtlA.l
"-"'OINCHOOt Hl .. t 1
C'll0$S hOOIII AA[A 1
.,. "
_J
ti ., I
I
't
I
-➔
I
/ I
h: ~
I !I i I .. : f
\ :
I I
I
I
1
I
I
I
'
0 i I
I
SIOH11RlANOlt
R[ CM&. GAADtNG
ANO UTIUTY PL.AN
1, ◄VEHICLE II ACCESS
~
(/)
~ w
(/)
·(
.. I
I
IUt.OIHQ JOOJPfhNT 73-ii I
_,_""~~· ~~;:-~OAC••"!L_ ----~ --; ) I'
SIIGM1fl'IAHG4.£
RC. tML<i't-'OtHG
A1,0U1\.11'V PLAN
L
OASl1(0LIN( NOC.All'-9AC,.
[llSflNQ ATTA(:.H(Q WAI.If.
0(1.t.Cttf.O S U>lWALK AHO 1
Tft(tV.,.._.. PIIOPOSC:'"
ZON.nG ,.,
CVAR(NTUK ...
bl, lYP t)"M(NSK)N$ Of
Pt110P0$l0 O(TACHE.O
SCKYIM.,C AHO TRf.(LA~
-;RO~V~-----------~7
:i '
Ul(llll!Jl'I
\JMIC('\lll
h t.J'l
WBATESAVE lONIHO II l&
GUIUl[N1' use
RUIOtNflAl
PAHO$,UCA°"1fCI
&tvtUJNfS rACNl ea.tu out.., ,_ o, ,.
HANSPOA 'A 1 aN
[A$CM(NT TYP AT
[LATU NIO
IAfUAW M
CM. c..MCIHt.J NfO ~n, '"PV-1•
~ i-
M
M w
!
SITE DATA TABLE
ZONE CIISTRl(1 1 OU() -" OPCNl,AC( »•S"GSI i : J PAIIJI.IHQ(All IURFAC() lO».CSI'
IVIU)INQ ,oolPAUH• HNCt.UOE$ UflPEA Ll~L 142'7G$F
~ PROJ(CTIOH$ (!CIJOIH<i R,0,0,: (A\tlS)
f """ 101'~$1TCMt• 1)0,-GSr
Q 11 ACAES
• MCAS DAU00Ht01 COVEfilAGC AS otr1Nf.C l't l(C10.. 116-1 ~NSJO,NAL
RCO\llflllUf.NtS M TH( ltG.f.\'VOOO ~Al (00( ltUC:
DWELLING UNIT/PARKING SUMMARY
t8'0't00MIJNIT$
, l([)RO()&.I !!!!!.
tOfAL UNITS
~
P.wtuCUAtU
SJAHnAAO
ACCUse&.1
lOAOIHO $PACU,
1111.l.flAltl(~
PUC PLAN LEGEND
-<1 PE0f.S18'1AH ACtlU
► Vt.Hitt( A(.C( ss
4 AtSCOl:NI ACCESS
X): PAAt(IHQSTALL D[StGNAltON
ACCUS1ILE ROUI(
l ~ ,. ,.
l21DUIAC.M
" • 4JNC ,v...,.,
l&INT(ROR telJCT(~
0 ~~~HITECTURAL SITE PLAN
a ,a ~ 40-
N
EB
80'
THE FOUNDRY
APARTMENTS
SW DEVELOPMENT GR OUP
0
.c
Ul
...
u
en r z w
2 r
~
<(
CL
<(
>-~
0 z ::::,
0
LL
w
I r
1ST SU8MITTAL
2ND SUBMITTAL
~ z w
:I: a.
0
...J wo. >:::,
+w:
Cla
I
z
<(
~ a..
UJ
I-
Cl)
0 => a..
201S-09-28
2015-10-IS
ARCHITECTURAL
SITE PLAN
40F9
THE FOUNDRY APARTM ENTS
••
>JOO
5l00
PROPOSED BUii.DiNG
FF = 5304 .18
/r
AOOFOAAIN
(FROM ROO,TOP
POUO OUTLET (TYPJ
RAlt,GA,AOEM
THE FOUNDRY APARTMENTS
ROOFDR A.lt4
Cf'ROMR~tOP
PONO OUTL.£t 41YP~
PROPOSED BUILDING
FF •5304.18
ID
PROPOSED
----5280 --------.,,. ----
-,--,--,--,-
-------
□ ~
III
N
lO
HQlilZlh.1Al ~t••2C'
LEGEND:
PAOPtRTY 80\JNOAAY
RIGHT .OF WA V ,l lNE
CONTOUR MAJOR
CONTOUR MINOR
FENC£
r!BEA OPTW:: 1,.1UE
flRE SERVll;.E
GAS LINE
OVERHEAD POWER
SANITARY SEWER
WAT£RL"1E
STORM SEWER
RET AIHIUG WALL
OUMPSUR
G.a.l£ V-'LVE
SANIT~Y MAUHOLE
'AANSFORMER
\JTILllY POL£
ROOl=lOP DETENTION
SITE BENCHMARK
"'
""
E)t l9-TIUO
0
""
BENCHMAR~ CITY ANO COUUT'I' Of OEflYER BUICHl1U,RK NV M8ER 48A A CCC
BRASS CAP 1.0CATEO AT THE NORTHEAST CO'lUEA TOP OF CURB At THl':
Ll {TERSECT~U 01= YAU AVENUE ANO 8R0.0.0WA'I' HAV•l•G APU81.ISHE0
ELEVAT~t~ OF$~ ~T fEET (UAV0881
t,OTES
1 ALL OU SITE STORMORAIUAGE. SY'i-""EMS ARE PRIVATE
;z A Bt.AUKET EASEJ.IENT Will SE OEblCAlEDBY Pl.AT FOR
THE PRIVATE STORM ORAlllAGE SY~tl:.M
THE FOUNDRY
APARTMENTS .
SW DEVELOPMENT GROUP
..,
.
V U
~ ::J .. • :::J 11) .
"
U) r z w
:E r c:::
<( a..
<(
>-c:::
0 z
::>
0 u.
w :c r
1ST SUBMITTAi.
2ND SU BM ITT AL
::z
:5
0-
w
!:::: en
Cl => 0-
2015-09·28
2015-1().15
GRADING &
UTILITY PLAN
5 OF 9
THE FOUNDRY APARTMENTS
•
THE FOUNDRY APARTMENTS
PUD SITE PLAN
A PORTION OF LOT 1, GENERAL IRON WORKS SUBDIVISION
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH , RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, ARAPAHOE COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO
ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY
A PORTION OF LOT 1, GENERAL IRON WORKS SUBDIVISION
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST Y. OF SECTION 34. TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WE ST OF THE 6TH P.M ..
LEGAL DESci11•110N . ,EnlllE WO IK AIC 71M16385•4
LOT 1 C(N(IIIIJ.t1•0tt~IP.$·140MSIOI\I
(~l" TH4f ~'f041Hllll(O, COttDl~l0 l'fllll[CIONAl fltA.NSPOll1A1ON0.STIIICT AS
fttCl1'(01Nllll' .. ltAM0011110Ut CQ[lilO 01-cv-ocm UH-TA 11ttofll:Dt0,n•o•••:t• 4'0CW
UN'Ollt ltfCl"IOt\l NO ~•$5 ANO lll~lCOIIOlD.UOlllll 1S ~4,INtl(• llllf:CIPTON NO IIMOlntO
COUN l"I Of Alt-,..HOl.STAf[OICOI.O-,t,PC) AND
11, ,~u OF LAkD lOl:ATlO IN THI. NW l'4 0, 1Hl MW 11• or &[C;'UON ,,., Tcw-MSHIP 4 '°"'"
IIA.tr1U;[ .. M$TO, TH( 1TH _, .. MO"l ,AflltC!JV,lllll l 0[s,;1t1NOASfDUCM0
~K)[lllllftO THE MST LIN[Of TH[ JlW 1.40, aAIOllCT~ )4-'S l(MlllilO SOUTtu;1r1r:r
('41 AfCDWUt AU IN.MWC~~Alfef.DH[llll(IM ltl~TIVJ tH(lll[f.;a
COl,l'l,IUC,INO •t TH[ "°"Ttf\l'CltCQIINlllO, SAID KC:110N'4 TH[NCl IOUTHCQ't871" E.ASt
"'-Ol'tOTHl ~1 l,IN(O, &AIDHWl••O, HC110JitSolAC)ISTAtti;t: 0' ~)1101Fl[t fOTHl
IOU1HW(S,1(0,-NUOf 1Mt NWl-tOf IACJlrilW1,.I
1HtNC.l l.oll1'HN'11'1rlAST AQtS'fANCl0' 22' 1•r ((T 'fOA"OINT ()NTHE l.t.atf:lll'f Ut<l(OI
Tttt: l'Ulll.lffC'fON"UftOAOltlC"T-0,,w,l' t'0'11tllllY •TCHl30ftt 1DPlUAH01.ANTAt't
IIIIAUIIOAOI ,11,k0 TH( ~fO'llG,lNNINQ
TH[NC.l Al.ONG IA() l.l.Sftlllll't 11:CHT-Or.~VLIN[ .t.l.ONGA MON-lAl<,[NT CUltV!. 10 TNt lln
WITHAMAACUNOUtOI ,012,u, A HOIISOf ,,,,.,,,,, •c utlt.t.L llttG4lOIOO"lncr
ANDA Cl'IOlt01HA1 l(M. NOIITH WlnT tAST ADLST•ct 0, ,OtJ •ttr 1D1Ht IIOUflfVCSI
COflNfll Of LOT 1 auUM -o.,iwo,tc.a IUIOIVISON AS lt[COltDf.0 CtetNMll I l~UNDIII
lllllC("Ot tilO ~ Of' tMf: COUNh' CUll:a AHO ltl~Df.n 0"1Cl
fHIUCtNORtHN-n)rl,UT Alc..01,C[ IOUttlUILV llf.llOf lAIO l.01 t ADdfAMClOl-llM ,u:t
tO fNt l"IT[UlC1otWtH 1'Hl MJTJltlf l1Nl0# 'ICl:TNG-"..A~Au0 111H1 OTlNOlO
1'H(filCllOU1HOVVTlrfA:S1 AUJN0MJ0"-111llllllVlltt[0'tOL1TH~AG0$1Rl[f
01(N0(0AOIS1Nf!Ct OI 2t 11f[ET tO TH[ S0i,11H\l_,r: OfSAIC>NW t '40f TN[ NY'll 1 40#
StCTO.Sol
1HlNCl aoutH 1r:tt.2-MIT A.1.0NGIAOIOIJTHt JHl •D1$tMCt C,,.10t5 ,ttT 101''4t P()tNT
Of"lltGINNWG C~1'0,AltAHHOl &TA1'EO,t.DlOIIIAOO
SUBJECT PROl'ERTY UINO DESCRIPTION
A ,Oltl'OfOl l01 l,CINUl.t.l lllONY«)fitlll lUPvlSOk.lllCQIIOlOIN.:xJltl.tf i,...c.rn ll[C(~ION
NUUl(lt nm:,olN TH( MI-.PAHOE cou .. h' C.t.lh AND ltlCOIIOflll, Of'•a llllwQtN$lCTICft,.
T~'""' • IOLlfH IIAHCif: M Wt.It 0, T"t llltTl't lMINCI_.AI. Mllllt)IAN, 111111/1/UI/IOt COUM1'Y Cr1'Y Of'
lNCUWCX)O COU)ltAOO ll.llfQ --E .. ,umc:uv,1t1, V IXSCltUatO AS ,cuo.w
etGINNINOAT lHl '°"'""'ST "°"'IIT'(COltfilll Ol t.01 11,ou"D .. ltl .... llll #l" NOC~
r..r.1Ct10U1H"7)")f"MS1 Au,t,10 tHf NO,-THlftLV"0W'UN[ Of MS1' BAfUAV(NUI A
O&STAHC:r; o, :z'B«IUU
l'HE..Ct tJti,NlflNCA ~TON TH[ i.QltTHfltl,TltONU'ft ()f''l,(ll &A.TlSA\llNl,t( NOIITHOO".,.-
lMT ADIS1.U.ClOfJ1"1'$'U1
tHUtCt NOll:TH1t"5"0I" [AST A OOU,.C(OI 111t1 tl(T 10Af101N1'0M lH[WU1'ClllllV ltOINllN(
Ol80UT~U.Al'lllltU1'
1tril~t SOUTH OO"t•"CIS" [AST ~ONG lM( WES1lll~Yll0Wt.lNEOI SOUfH [I.Jtll ITIIUT AOtSTANCl
0, n, 11 IHT '-Oll(Olt LU$ TO TH[ PQINT o, 81.ClfttfONG
CONTAlfil11tG•J IS 1r It 1>&ACll:U1 MOflE 01111 llSS
~EYOR'S CER!!f!CATE;
(ftRHfDTO;
f0Uf10PT l UC A CO\OP.A()O llMJUC llA&ilOr CO,~tPAl~r
fHl1lS 10 CEPllff 11-tAl rnis,., ... POP rtA.l "'''° IH~ SUPVfl
01IWt1CH n tSMSEOWEF'E ,,,AD( II ACC.OPC-"IICf: wr.H
I Hf ·-:o, I l.\ltllt.\:Jl.1 st• IIOA.PO 0£1-"lt J>[OVIP[t.1(10:s fOIP
AltA/.ACSt.\lAUOIIIU s~•rvcvs JOnmv ESIA8USHE0
AUD •OOPH:Otu AU.A AllO 11srs. AIIOUICWOB ,w.,s.
~ 3.-1 ~ c-A 8 . )l,1,, 118 -~ I.a It, 17 18_ IQ AII0:0-"0f
t1o.e1f A IH(PfOr
LlGALNOTIC~
A.CCOPOnlG CO COloPAOQ tA\'I l"0\.11.\UST C0',11.lfUC( Atn llGAl
•ctlCU e, .. uo UK)IJ Atlv OHECI IU THIS LAIC)!.l.'l,>\;(t PLAT ~•/;)HUI
IHHE f[APS AJl(f ¥OU 11.-st OISC0V[P"E0 !UCH OEffCI fl 110 EVU.l
l,1AY All, tEG•I A.CIIOII flA~EOl:1'011 •m Off(CI HI THIS tAUOSUs:'V[Y
rtAI B( COMl,1fltClD•.~0Pl HiAll 1(11 l(HS rPCI.\ Htf 0Al( 01
C[Pt1ll(AIIOII S,HQ' .. IIHitf'[OII
INDEXING STATEMENT·
OHOS.ff£01HIS_OA'f0f ___ =.,...,,_ ::0.._.... .Al
---· t.\ fHOOt -----Of lH[ couiar
s1.:r~r1DP'S tAU0!.UPV[fJPICH1-0f,W•'I' :1.1rvh s ., fACf tS)
-F(Cffl011 IIUl.18(F ___ _
COUIITI' Slr--vt'l'O~/D(PUh COi,;lllY SUJ.IVE10V
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COUNTY OF ARAPAH OE . STATE OF COLORADO
60 1 WEST BATE S AVENUE
AITA/ACSM OPIIONAL TAIIE A NOlQ:
,.,Olll!U!.1115 Pt•CE:J IOPA f.>EIH'UtCf t.\OIIUl.~WI OP w:111tss 101H[
OPU{P) AT All t.,A,OP COPll(PSOl tHE &O\:UOAJ"f OJ lK(. H'OPfFlr
'fll[SS A.LF(AQY I.\AP,{OOP PflEPWCEDb~ t-i:s:111(" 1.tOUVl,l(UTSoP
wr.UESSES AS SNOWN HOIC N,
: AO()Pfs.llfSI f DISCLOSED IU l"IECOPDOOCur.tfulS. ,; lBSEPVEI
WH\E COIIOUCI 1110 THf SOPiff:T ,Ki, w IAttl~YI tKGllWOOD ,,n mu
COMMrfMINf)
) flOOO;OII[ Ct.AS51f1CAl011 fV'/11►1 N'OFEP AIUICl!AII )116A:Sl0•
ft::)Ehl fLOO:) IUS:JPAIICE 1-'AI( 1,Ut"S, :·PIH( SlAI[ Of Al
EOUIY•lUl1J OEPCTED er SCAHOM•F l· ATIOU "-11D CEi ;PAI HI
Pl0TIIUC 0Ul 'I' JONI l. AllAS Ot111MIKfi010110UTIIDl 1Ht 0.3 AHA
IPOU. MAP lm0DSCG!41l 0l(;tMIU if. iOIO).
-I GPOSS •t1DAJ"(A •11D OT~(P.APE•SII SP[ClltD&•IH(
P.AHNl PAICU AltA:~st.511•/• lQ/R • ,a.ss, ACIII
SUIJIC1 ,10,11n AllA: tl.051 .,. s.am • 2,1)6 Ac;■rs
PAleNf ·••cu UXCUJCMNG SUUICl SRI) AHA: ,U,$11♦/• sa,n · &.414
ACIII
5 .... fri,C .. t +'(Ll(f wnH lttt sou~CE Ot 1WC,F"t.1ATOU tf G GPOu1,o
\UPV['f OP A[IP:A_ ,.,.P) cou:ouP llil£VAl o .... ,v,., A:IOO~IGll!AUUG
t,(IJCtu,,d'I ID(litll 1(:,) II[ HMCMMAII SlAHMINT. o" curP[Ul ZOIBIIC CtA!.SlflCAllQII .. $ PPO·✓tDED8t IHt ,:SU•'(9
IONING CI.AUIPICATION NOJ ,.OVIO(tl IY TN! INSUit■,
o!I HOT 1eouunD If CLIIN1.
J{A) ;iCI Not l[QUlSfU) IY CUlNl.
8 5L'eST•l~l1Al rtA.11.'tts 06S[P..-t011, tHl rlPOCES.S 01 c:01:DUCTIPIOl ►I(
SIJPV[ r (IU •oonio11 10 h1l ll.M PO\ilM( 1:15 AUD r(Atl,)P[S PfCUIP!D
V:lOff' SECtlOII !; AeQVEI $UCk AS l'Afl lllGtc,a !ll!IO•POS. $K:;!IS
SWlf.V.\IIIC l'OOl!. t•1lOSC•f'lOAP[AS nc AS IHOWNHtleON.
0 IO NOl ltauuno" CUIN1.
1 I ("'I IOCAIIOUO# UUUTl[S 065lPV[D (V,O(l1C( .U SHOWN HIIION.
t8/ LOCAt-:)11 Of Ufll.111[5 -S:fP\o(.0 EVlOEll~f fOCETHE~ w:111
(.vtOlllC( I POI.\ f'lAflS OBIAH I[ D f P(JI.I Ulllffl' co,.,rAlllU 01->
Pf-0, 1ocoe, Ctllll Alf~l.1AhlllC$ 8Y Ulltn, co1.1FA.lll(S AllO
ClHEP apr~Ql'PIATE :.ou~C(S ... , SHOWNHlHON,
I: NOT HOUUTID ll C:UIN1,
~3 IIAl.\[50f A.CJ01rnuco:mtP.SOI PLilo.ll[OlAIIDS-"CCOPOIU 10
CUS:-FU,l PUbllC P(COPOS AS lttOWN HUlON
t.1 ()IS!AUC( TOuf•FUI ~:tEPSEC:1ucs:tur •S SJEC.f1£D&, lHf CllfU1
Al SHOWN HHIOtll.
15 NOT lfQUUTID It ClllNf.
l1t1 OIUH'Y(O EVIOUICE OF CUHEi 11 E •HH t.iO'lrlC WC,f.'1 !IJlt()ltlC
COIISTPuCTIOltOF euit011JG A00tfl0US. NOHE OHUV(O.
17 FPOf'O.!.EOCH.&.llV(5 IU SJF(EI PIC!-11 Of W'-Y IJl(S. ,i uno,,.,.ric1111
AVAIL.A!!lf fPOl.t IHf C0tlff.>0HHl0 Jli~'ISOCTl()II ots.H'-..:EOEVIC(HC£
Of rtct111 SiPf[T OP S IO(WAII co11s:Puc1101~0~· P[f'AIPS NON!
OISUYlb.
re OIU[FV(O [VIOEIIC{ 01 s1a UH AS SOIIO WASH. ou,.,r su,.,~ c ,~
!Alltl.AP, l"-110, H NONI OISUV!D.
lC> l0CAll()U0f W(HAUOH(A5AS0Ettu(A1(00, AIPr-QHIAfl
,. Urt10t·11u NONI 0ISOVID.
:'(.I_ (A.1 l ~ All 1t.iJ"•POVlt.t(1:tswnur11 Atl, Off!:)[ E•m.•~rilS O'-'
S(tvnuocs etuun111G ltt'E s:;~·-..f•fDrPOHf.>h lH.4-1 •if O~ClCS[~HII
lit[ ,rcoro DOCl'l.\(ll:S n--o·.-1moto Ill( !.l:~",(,OF Au:> AtE
oe~!f'V(O U IH( tPOCE!.~ f OHOUCHIIC, lt1f SUPVh ICl1(1'110
oe:Au II( E:S•Pr J'[Hl!SOIIS) NON( OtsUYlO.
:,,:1 t81 :-' NOT HQUISTtD ., C:UIN1 .
SCHEDULE 1•2 NOIES FOR 601 W. IAllS AV!NUflP ER OLD REPUBLIC NA110NAL
inLE INSURANCE COM P .. NY COMMnMElll ABC70416385-4 DA1ED SEPTEMBER 12.
20151:
l All1 ,--.:-.1s PICttlS. 1;T(P(SISOf.> c~-0.UlHA.1 ,1,,tf 1101 SHOWll &, 1Hl r,.,;elC ncoros Bt,1
WHICH CO\:tO ec A.5C[f.>TAIIHPSY All tU!.f'[C1.01, Of IH( IAIIOOP IHAT '·'"" eE "-~SEPtH)ffY
PEf'SOtlS rt f'OSSES.SIOII Of ltl( tAtZO N()f A. 'JUtVIY fflM. z. [ A:t,.,UUS. u:us 0~ mcur.1SS:-..11C{S. OJI CL .. V.\S I H(PIOf 1101 St40WII 6r 1Ht P\J9llC
PECOPOS. N~T /ii Sl,tlvlY fflM.
J AIIT (:tCPC•CKr.tfUIS. £11CU/,tlWA.r1CfS VOl.All()U VAF":Al()II Of.> .AO\o·(rst CtPCc1,1SIA1J(!
AfffC11tlG TH!: ll'llf IHAt wou10 ef OtSClOSE08r All ACCL1'1.Alf .AIIOCOt,IPl(I( t.AI IOSUP\ifYOr
IKE tAUJ A!l:lll~I S~OWII 91" P08LIC r(COIPDS N-Qf A SutYU MM.
.l AIU U(uOPf'IGHI TO.A LIEU 10~ S[PVICES.tA80P~ t.H1l[P.Al ~EFHOIO"'f 0P+ilt!A.r1£i
IIJtt!~KEO IMPO~£D6r l,l,,.W AUJ uOt SHO~·m 8' 1Hf f>t:fHIC P(COPOS JtOTA W t ffl tftM.
!i OHECTS l'UIS. wcu,.1eP•11Cts. AOV(PU: ClAIMSOP CiH[P l.1AAEPS If AIIY CPEAlc.0. f lPSr
Af'PE,t.PIIIGIIJ t1-1( rue11c PICC>POS OP ATTACHIIIG su&W~U(tll io THE (H[C11\"{ c•u HE~tOf eur
N'l()P 10 ·v: DAil hi( FPOPOS(O 11:SuS'fOACOu1P[S, 01 rtCOPO fOP TH( V"'LU( IME (1lA.1£ C,P
1;rcnst OJ ,:.OFiCAG[ lH(PlOII COVU'E:::>!lr T~l$COI-.M.lllt.,U:t Not A lUIVll l'ltM.
~ /A) TAll:[S(•" AS.S{!.SUEtJIS lHAt AP( UOI SHOWIIAS t•is:,:c 11£11S er IHf PECOPOSOI AltY
t.i.~IIG ,1,,.U)HC,PLh THAT t[\;l(S IA 11:[SO-' ASSES~.itntS Oti Pf Al rPOPH'lr OP 8'f TIIE f'l/SUC
JJtCOPOS. !&l f'POCHOttlGS a, A PUBtlC AGEIICt lkAI , ••• 'r PtSU11 IU t,0:[5 OP .A!.S(s.s,.1rn1s ~
U01CES0f $1.1Ct4 rPOCEEDIUGS WHW<EP OP uor SHOV,·U ar IHE ncOPO:s; 01 SUCH •Gt11Cr Of
Sr HIE PUBIIC PfCOPOS NOl A SUIYU mM.
"/ (A) UIIPAUlltf01.,,m1G Cl0,1$. Ill r(!.(PVAUOI IS OP trCEPl,OIIS Ill PAl(ll1$0'1 II .It.GS
A.:JlHOPit111c TH( l!.!.UAtlC( 1HfPE0f· IC) WAtfr PIGH1S. C?Alf.1$.~ TlflE IOWAl(r NOT A SUI VU
mo1.
B fl\~1':~ l(.A5E5 AIIO lfu&uCrt:$. 11 AUJ NOT A SUI YlY nt:M
Q [Am.,tr:I OPAUUOTO tHt ca, 01 rncuwooo. IOP a. WAl(HIII(, AIIPlllCOf.lllAt
tL9f'()S[5 ei 11:sn·u1.,rnt rECOPDf0AUGUS1 P IQSJ Ill eoo, 817.At P•GE '.\'8 A'lffl0Wl4
H1HON, APUc:TS PAl!Nl PAIClL
10 111u.111;:t11:01 I.AH r OHEllOI NOT A. SUIVEI fffM.
11 c--.m.,(Hl C,.S:AHlfO ro UIIO[POPOUHG lilltrh U l (S f'IPfS Ati'J s:PUCIUPES. I Qf;
UUD[PGl-'Cl.'110 UULO r UUCS. ~u:> IIICIOEWAI PL1Pf'O$U. er II 1su>u,~1un PlCO~OfO
AUGU~l:U JqB!. Hlr.001 ~:, .. 1r1icE~~•1JOPfCOr::i1osEPUr.1eEPIO. loS!.11H001 ~!.J~
.r rAG[ ~-~ Al SHOWN Hl,-ON. AfflCTS PAIINJ PAICIL
1::-EA.!U.•lllfS co110:nous.co-.. c11•11iS J.'fSlf'ICllOl:S P!SEPv.r<ll()i.S AIIOUOHSOtlTHf
r'1Al Of CUl~flAl lfOIIWOrt $ SU8D1VtSIOt1 FtCOPO(OPECOPOlO 0EC[,.1MPt.i i "'8~
Ull::)(P f.'fClrHOll t IC'> :@:=Ai Al I.HOW .. HIUOH.
801.m:).41->y Ull A.._ Jl'~.t•.tfUI IIJ COllllfCllOII IH[l->f\"ldll J fCOPOft) JUI Y; ::ocI'. UIID(f
HC(f'IICIII f.10 8::'I IQQ,e,O AHlCll IUIHCl SffE.
).) t[tr.,s (O'IO.ao11S. t ·rovislOltS l!-L·~i'.)EllS oeUGAIQUS At10(A.$ft.tlWS AS Sll fOF'lH
A::Q GPAl11(0111 FA.l l'ASltUC[P S[NIC{ [AS(r.\(lllS PfCOPDIO Af'P1l 'Z t~J Ull:>1:P
PIC[r;o:11:0 A 7(1l91t7 001$ NOT AfflCT PAllNffAICll 01 SUIJIC1 sm.
1-1 IH't/J. co1101:o,:s, fPOY~IOUS 61.JJ':)EUS A11008llGAll()t1$ AS sn rOlliH n1 VOltJl il-'~Y
,1011 ruu:J>.t.!10t1 >-~P([rT1rn1.,.ccoPDED JtJl• 1:. 1-009 u110£P r cc[rno11110 .,,_,..1 •~
A,,(CTS S\IIJlct Sift 1111 NOJ ,-LOff,ltlL
l!i (lilt.I 11,:(nlOrlAtt, OElflf DI NOT A IUIVU fflM.
lo inu., 11:1(::rorlAlll OUfllDI NOT A IUIVU fflM.
11 ,nr,., COl,18111ED Wltll OfU 1:, NOtA SUIVIT fflM.
IB ,11(t,tlll1Hm011-"lt~ OflEHDI NOlAHIYU IT!M.
lQ Hrl-\5 COII0!11Q1:s. ,.~ovi.scus e uPO(tlS kt ID OBIIGATIOHS .AS 5£1 fOPltt IUoP':>IIIC.AUC!
UO !i :'lll:'J:1:llJJ.·fCC,'10lOr.iA1,>C1i I.a :DIJUfl0f.,~fCff>t011110 0•(\18,.\!, APIICTUUIJICT
Sift. llff .. Ot PLOffAILl.
::0 l(J·1.1 CQll::)lllQIIS f'J'OVCOIIS. 81.!P()ttlSAIIOOf!llGAHQl;S A$!.(l fOPltt ,1 S.ti tlD C~fll
rtA.tlllU.• ml OEVEtOtf.t(l!I "'fCOJ'0£01.IO IJ ·.tll)(.,Ut)[PrtC(f'llOIHIO ~(l~M~ AfflCU
SUIJ!C1 Inf. IUT NOJ ,,on-.1u.
I
GfNEIAL NOTES:
I LAUO tlllf Gl,'AP•llif[ COMP.lUY co,.11,1:11.\[l:t A6C7~1~ -I DAftO
S(Pllt.16EP ,:. :m! WAS HUH)UPOU II JN'fPAJ:'ATIOU or 1HIS $CPV£Y
~ !UPVCV flEtOWOIII VIAS COt,\Pt(l[Dltl 4UGU~t AliO SEra,.1eEP :015
J IAl,\,,Of HAIINGI . THE t•S!S Of BO ~'IUO Ci fliE SOUIHEH v lHlf Of LOl I
GU;ff.>At 11--'0,ll \'10'11 S ~ue:,t,:IS()H 8f.lW[flJ IH( rOt,.111D ... PUA.II WIIH uoc•r
AIIJTME fOUII:) 15 P(BAP WflH 1 $" •~u,.~:r:u,., C:Ar l tS;B:!IBJ HAVIUC AU
A!.Su:.1ED BlAf'tlJC Of WO-:~ JS' W
4 UflUf'f NOil: (xl$1111GUl1UfiU LOCAIIOIIS $1i0W11 H(ft[OII "P( 8A5ED 011
StJ~"CE lVIPEtlCE OF U1•1nu AtJ D TH1ro p..r;t lOCAl(S 110
POT-H0t1110 WAS COI.\PtEIEOAI )HIS H,.,e Allil uDE lAIJD cou 1mt•1:1S oou
1101 CEtllFY/CU.tiF'A::l[E ACCI.J~l,.C~ 01 A,llY C:01'1' Ul110YIAAPS J"f (1(0 IJF'Ofl f◊P
fP[rAPA.l()IJ R tS IHE COIIIPACIOP"S FESPOilSIBl~ll, lOCOrtf1P,., All (;111.ff l(!.
F'PIOPlO C:OltSlf'UClOlt
!> S;i( .. oornststS d)I w 8•1CS AV[ (UGl[W000(f'(~' rn,E C0'-\1.',:lt.,HIIJ
it, All l,t(A.!.UPH.*IIS U r•~[::iHHES.AFE P(Pr1•t All 1.1f,1,,.$UJ"['.1[111S Ill 80LD
ll.AUCS AP( AS MfASl.'fEO rl TtU IIHO
J •tt lllf.APf.1EAS\;P£t,\fl:lS WEJ'E TAI Ell l,ISltlG lttl ll S SI.it\. fr ioo1
Clh AUOCOUtlh 01 0£.IIV(J;I !!E.1tCK1.1Ah l~Ot,l!EF' 4e.,l A. CC08PASSCA.f'
l0C.AH0 Al IH( fl0PiH{A~: COPriEP TOf'OI CUF!I •1 IHE 11:t[PSECTIOtJ 01 t.At[
•VUIV[ At10e~•Dl-'•' HAVll lGA F'UBUS11£D(lfliA1IOUOr !,~1H?H£1
(Jl,1,,1,'0flB)
====~ ~L}!f_!!!?t,
b-111. I Ul"h j m:::t I v,.t:dk'.XA
Jut.-.,,o-~,O 1,.,.1, 1;:. SHEET 1 OF 2
DATE. 9.25.15 !Joe UO: 15-165
o.-,..., COIIC:l♦
Ho•all.fi.,,d~CICon'I
A,11.1....,..lor«"o(O'n
THE FOUNDRY
APARTMENTS
SW DEVELOPMENT GROUP
u
en
I-z w
~
I-
0:::
<( c..
<(
>-0:::
0 z => 0
LL
w :c
I-
1ST SUBMITTAL
2ND SUBMITTAL
1-z
UI
:I: a.
0
-' W"-
>" WC
+E
z
<(
_J a.
w
I-
en
0 :::, a.
2015-011-28
2015-10-15
SURVEY-GEN
NOTES
60F9
THE FOUNDRY APARTM ENTS
THEFOUNDRYAPARTMENTS
PUD SITE PLAN
A PORTION OF LOT 1, GENERAL IRON WORKS SUBDIVISION
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH . RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PM.,
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . ARAPAHOE COUNTY. STATE OF COLORADO
ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY
A PORT ON OF LOT I. GENER AL IRON WO RK S SU BDIVI SION
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST J, OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANG E 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAP AHOE. STA TE O F COLO RADO
60 1 WEST BATES AVENUE
27D1 S ELATI ST
OWNER. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
601 Wl;ST BATES AVENUE
OWNER: SAND CREEK INVESTORS LLC
PARENT PARCEL AREA • 459,581 SF (10.551
ACRES) MORE OR LESS
PAAENTPARECELAREA
(EXCLUDING SUBJECT PROPERTY)= 366,523 SF
(8.414 ACRES) MORE OR LESS
' • ..,,
,..,..,
SUBJECT PROPERTY AREA • 93,058 SF
(2.136 ACRES) MORE OR LESS
8
''-•QH)IIIIIUM
flll1"1 t"au....W -"--..........
MIUIIIMlalO _ ... ,,,,
.,,..on _,. ..,,.
.... , ..
'---:::.':t1r
0..azt"N'll"W
Qt....,,-. ..,_, ,....,., _ . .., _ ... ..,. .,.....,,,
PJll ,,
'
GENUAL NOIU:
IAUOHHt CIIAhl !U co,.,PA·n COt.u.,::,.-.m1 •8C10-Jlt,..."fl.S--I CAl[D
SlPt(r,,f • :01~W,J,$ PCUEDllKltl IU f'PEP"-PAIIQll Of lHn SU~V{t
SI 1( fl 0W0P! WA.SC0•.,Plft[:>r, ... ucc:fAU:)!;lrl[M6O':0 5
IASIS Of HAIINGl: 6ASC.0' @:(APHIG 1$ IHf S0UiHEP1'r Lfi( Of lCI I
Gll ... , ,►, II\.,, ,,ss1.1101VISIOll 8CiWfEU l~E fOUU:) ... PE&•Pw:fttt10 CAP
Afl'J 11 l fOI 1:, •!. )£&A ,·,ntt 1 !,-"-lU1.4 111t,N.1 CAf' ns :e;~ ~ .......... "; ,It.ti
A!Sur.,1 !,f,t,f/JUG Of S8?"':J JB w
.a unun NOTI [)flSilllC ualfu l0CA1tC)l:SSH0WU Hf PEOU O'E 6"-~EDOH
SU~A:l lVIDUICl Of ll1fll11fSJttl01Htf.'OP.U1r LOC.Al(S.uO
~o: 10t.111GWASCOrAf'tE1CJAI bHS-H',1[ Allnuot l"r:QC0t:S-ullAl!lSDOU
,01 CfFHl1'/GUAFAl:TH A:,CIJ~AC1' 01 AU, CQt c:-.ur ,.1 .. rs PELl~OIJPOII ,o~
F'nr•F·AtlOII n tS IHI co11:r•CIOPS nSPOl'!l61Uh to coiu,n, All t,111,ll1(S
Pll'IOP 10C0HS1F'UC!OiJ
!, sra AOOF'!SS(S IS c()I .,, &•lls AV( UIC,tfl-"IOOC lf'(ll Mt( CCJ.11.1:1.10tl
e All f,4(ASl/Pft.1flllS ltl F'AF'!tlitt(SfS AH f'f P rt.At AH ,.lEAS-1.!,[MfUTS Ill fl{jt0
ffAUCS ,It.I,'{ AS r.HASUF[:)IJI TH[ ll(l0
., A.l~ tltlf .t.$11,1(A$-l)Pft,1f1:I.I, W(P[ 1A1 (II USUO 1Hf US SUPY['I I
SHEET 2 OF 2
~~ •-··
l><l--·-
LTITUDE
...-~•<SlluCHIOf
A;l,l.,,dPlar«o(CII">
THE FOUNDRY
APARTMENTS
SW DEVELOPMENT GROUP
Cl)
I-z w
~
I-
0:::
<( a..
<(
>-0:::
0 z
::J
0 u.
w
J:
I-
1ST SUBl,IITTAl
2ND SUBMITTAL
t-z w
~
0..
0
...J w a.
>"' w ~ ·1
z
<C
_J a..
w t-
U)
0 ::, a..
20 15-09-28
2015-10 15
SURVEY-
ALTA/ACSM
70F9
THE FOUNDRY APARTMENT S
••
•
•• BATESAVE ·
,Ff;,;N l ~ltl
lll lfl'tt 110.-.0, ~ !I
THEFOUNDRYAPARTMENTS
PUD SITE PLAN
A PORTION OF LOT 1, GENERAL IRON WORKS SUBDIVISION
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, ARAPAHOE COUNTY. STATE OF COLORADO
RtG,MI n.,IIN S!lllil Nf<t,CE
ll'IIIQIIIOAJ\~••1
")O~A.,")-.t 2Cl1
i&.El'"T T~5~" O!S,bNr..F
JflOM(IAl'I.:;;
)';lil"1RCl,A~ l~
LI J'I' UFIN §it;}fll C.USl~t.(
,,=fr:fMCJl41\11Vlr.-¥; l-~~o n~
LEGEND
•llilN:l!:S!tl9lii!Blll&l:IMIIIHllil!llffiri!:d!l!&tlliiiliililSI COHCRET E WAI.I
I I I
LAUOstAPE BOlUIERS
BRI OC,E
BIKE RACKS
BOutDER SEAT WAU
DECIDUOUS
SH40E TREE
DECIDUOUS
ORtlAMEtlTAL TREE
ASSORTED SHRUBS
ASSORTED PER£NNIAI.S
& GRASSES
PERRENIALS &
GROUNOCOVEAS
LANDSCAPE DATA CHART
SIT£ AREAS AND DESIGNATIONS
ZOIIE DISTRICT
Sfl[ AREA
SlREtT rROtlTAG[
AREA or PARKING
8Ull.Ol t1G AREA
OVERALL REQUIRED LAtlOSCAPE CALCULATIONS
LAHOSCAP[ AR EA
TOT AL LAHOSCAPE AREA
NOii LMtlG LANDSCAPE 1.!ATERIAL
LANDSCAPE W.TERIAL
TREE S. TOTAL (1 PER 300 sr or RLA)
TREES. ST R[ET ( I PER 30 LF or fRQIITACE)
SHRUBS. TOT /.l (1 PER 50 sr OF RLA)
PARKI NG LOT !HlllSCAPING
lNTERUAL PARKING lOT LANOSCA!'lt1G
PERIMlltR LINE.Al FEET 10 BE SCREENED
LANDSCAPE NOTES
CJ
CJ
CJ
LJ
CJ
PUO
93,058
575
30,334
24,438
PRCMDEO
38,286
4l~
3067
PROVIDED
52
13
364
PRCMOEO
5887
387
UNIT
sr
LF
sr
sr
UNIT
sr
SF
UNIT
[A
EA
E.A
UIIIT
sr
sr
CRY 'ST11EAIA' U(1)
UlllRTYA!ro W"ll(
WAT(R 00,l,LTI'
NAWE SUll
PLAJcll0(,11,.I
EXACT OESIG!I INCLUDIUG LOCATIOtl or TREES, SHRUBS. PLAtlTltlG erns. CTC
Will BE OCTERMIIIED Al TIME or nuAt OESICl1
2. LAHDSCAPE PLAIIS SHOW PREUMitW!Y COtlC[PT AUD PWJlS MAY BE PLACED
AUYWH[R t WITHIN lHE Slit 80U1IOARY
3. PLANTS SHAU BE USED !HAT ARE WELL AOAPTEO TO COLORADO'S CUW.T[
FOUOWIU G THE CITY or EIIGL£WOOO LANDSCAPE W.tlUAl'S RECOMMEUDATIONS
IS EUCOURAGED
4. TREES tOCATEO ltl TH[ SlRm BUFFER SHAU BE SPACED A MIIIIMUM or
30' .
THE FOUNDRY
APARTMENTS
SW DEVELOPMENT GROUP
Ul c.. ..
\J
.L ill
. a..
0
.c
Ul
en
I-z w
~
~
~
<(
~
0 z => 0
LL
w
I
I-
1ST SUBMITTAL
2ND SUBMITTAL
1-z w
~ a.
0
...J
W"' >::,
WO ·1
z ::s a..
w
I-
en
0 ::::, a..
2015-()!l.28
2015-1(1.15
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
80F9
THE FOUNDRY APARTMENTS
..
••
•
Ol
I I .... ,
I I
I I
I I . I I .. ~ I I -~ I I ~-! I I
I I ]
I I 0 ~!~T ELEVATION-COURTYARD
t.lfCHA.t.HCAL
PTAC UNIT
AlVUINUMIWINOOW
TYP AT A\IENlnES
DA-t
StOREfAONl
(NTRYOOOA
® ~~~TH ELEVATION-COURTYARD
CB-1
g gaJ'mg g
g grn rng g
: []DJ Qm_g_ -! -~~
0 ~}T ELEVATION -COURTYARD
SW AERIAL PERSPECTIVE
THEFOUNDRYAPARTMENTS
PUD SITE PLAN
A PORTION OF LOT 1, GENERAL IRON WORKS SUBDIVISION
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH. RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M .,
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. ARAPAHOE COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO
Vlff'Tl YIINOOW'
T'l'P .-.1 UNIT$
~1 CB-l MECHANICAL
I ---..---,...__,r""'"T"llr"'I PfACUNrT
:1 l.\l ['~,.._....,._.,~~ ,~
0 ~-!~T ELEVATION
.... ,
... , mi ~:
~
C),IU-1
t
I I
THE FOUNDRY
APARTMENTS
SW DEVELOPMENT GROUP
-up I-z
I. w
:J ~
.1:., 0..
0
u ...J
. L Cl
wo.
>" .. + w ~ D a a ~ I u
3 ~
. (l_ ~
i:2
Ill
0 w :r:~!5
1-00
►c c,,: Ill 2 •
grrg g~
~ ~rrg ~rrg
mg g mg g mg 111
I I
t i I I
:Ul
UP'
... 1
(M!J-1
oz~ 1 ..
4 -~
Cl)
1-z w
... ,
'l
I I
-====="'i""' I I ., :.'.!' .tGit,
I I
I I
· I I
I I
t
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I 1
I
I
I I
0 ~-~~TH ELEVATION
® ~ .... ST ELEVATION
•• 1
t,IP1 IA? ...
UP-2 CB•I
OECOSIA flV{ t.CE lAt. MESN
GAAOEN $CR£lN WA.1.L
l'LIBE STEEL
GIJ.AAOc6EVCW.D1
CB,I
UP)
0 ?.~~TH ELEVATION
VlNvt WINOOW'
tvfl Ar ut11TS
MECHANIC AL
PTACUNIT
D
ST~EFAONt
(NTR''f' Do0k
AlL.eUINUMWNOOW
T'l'P AT AMENITIES
VIKYLWIN'OOW
T'fP At Ufilf$
UECHANICAl Pt.AC Utti.1
AlUM1NUMICL.At> VJ0
PATIO S\\!11'40 Dook
..
;,.
'l
I I A_.-tl&t~~,
I I
I I I I Cll,1
I I
I I ' I TUBE SltEL CUARO R.lJL
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
OECORATtvt M (1A~
U£$H SCREU,IWALL
~
l-o::
<( a..
<(
>-0::
0 z ::>
0
LL
z
::5 a..
w
t-
en
0 :=, a..
MATERIAL LEGEND w :r: .. , tAc•
~l"iltAT
.. ,., .. UEJAL PANEL
SIOIN(;.1
_, WET AL PAl,!El
S ICINQ2
... .a ME1.at.P,t,NE1
SIOINGJ
... ◄ un....__1u.t.,t
..,, C[t.lEN1 Po.A.RD
5IOCN0
ca.a C[M [Nt f!OARD
PANEL
,CilM,l .t Q.IU IWI WJ.JI""•
I-
1ST SUBMITTAL 2015-09-28
2ND SUBMITTAL 2015-1(H5
f
------
-------~-
BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
90F9
THE FOUNDR Y APARTMENTS
j 1;
• COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
DATE: December 21, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: Ordinance approving The
Foundry Site Plan of the Sand Creek
11ai Planned Unit Development
INITIATED BY: STAFF SOURCE: Audra L. Kirk, Planner II
Community Development
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Council approved the Sand Creek Planned Unit Development (PUD) District Plan February 4, 2013.
The District Plan approval required that before any residential development was to take place, a site
plan for the residential development would need approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission
and City Council .
PREVIOUS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered The Foundry Site Plan of the Sand Creek PUD at a
Public Hearing on November 3, 2015. The Commission considered testimony from staff and from the
developer and by a vote of 6 to O approved The Foundry Site Plan Sand Creek PUD and forward to
City Council with a favorable recommendation. No public testimony was received at the
• Planning and Zoning public hearing.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Community Development Department recommends that City Council approve a bill for an
ordinance to approve The Foundry Site Plan of the Sand Creek PUD, and set January 4, 2016, as
the date for a Public Hearing.
BACKGROUND
The Sand Creek PUD parcel is 10.55 acres and was formerly occupied by the General Iron
Works (GIW). RTD acquired the northern portion of the GIW parcel for its maintenance facility
in 2002. Sand Creek acquired the southern portion of the GIW parcel in 2010. These parcels
have been zoned industrial since zoning was first adopted in 1940.
The PUD is a rezoning process that establishes specific zoning and site planning criteria to
meet the needs of a specific development proposal that may not be accommodated within
existing zoning development regulations. A PUD rezoning provides the opportunity for unified
development control for multiple properties or multiple uses and is composed to two major
elements; a District Plan and a Site Plan. The District Plan provides the regulatory framework
within which development may occur and the Site Plan provides for the spatial distribution of
land uses within the proposed development.
The Sand Creek PUD District Plan incorporated the Permitted Principal Uses of the original
underlying 1-2 General Industrial District with the addition of residential uses. It further
stipulated that site plan approval for industrial, office or retail uses handled administrative,
whereas, residential development must have the site plan reviewed and approved by the
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council.
PUD OVERVIEW
The Sand Creek PUD District Plan was approved with the following:
A. Developmental standards:
1. Multi-family development:
a. Maximum building height: 75'-0"
b. Setbacks: All PUD setbacks for multi-family use shall be 5'-0"
c. Density: Maximum 45 dwelling units per acre (45 DU/ACRE)
d. Floor area/unit: Minimum 550 square feet
e. Maximum floor area ratio: None
f. Minimum open space (includes sidewalks): 25%
g. Minimum lot with: None
2. Landscaping:
a. A complete landscape plan shall be provided at time of submittal of final site
plan.
3. Parking:
a. Parking guidelines will be prepared based on future development use and will be
submitted with a final site plan and will follow Title 16, Englewood Unified Development
Code. Reduction of parking may be proposed for multi-family.
4. Public Land Dedication Requirements:
a. Parks, trails, and open space land dedication shall be determined by separate
agreement at time of final site plan .
B. Architectural Standards:
Form and materials for multi-family housing shall harmonize with the adjacent residential
buildings and be considerate of neighboring buildings. Submitted with the proposed PU □
are example photographs indicating the general level of design quality, finishes and
materials to be incorporated in the project.
1. Facades: exterior walls greater than 50 feet in length should break any flat, monolithic
facade with discernible architectural elements. Building designs, rooflines, or facade
treatments that are monotonous are strongly discouraged. Building facades oriented to
the street or public space should provide architectural variety and scale by incorporating
elements such as bay windows, doorways, entrances and windows, balconies, cornices,
columns, vertical plane breaks, and other types of architectural detailing to provide
visual interest.
2. 360-degree: a building's special architectural features and treatments shall not be restricted
to a single facade. All sides of a building open to view by the public, , shall display a
similar level of quality and architectural interest. Architectural features such as windows,
2
•
awnings, projections, reveals, changes in pattern, and trellises should be used on all
sides for visual interest. The dimensions of base, middle, and top should be carried
around from the primary facades to the side and rear of the building.
3. Flat Roofs: design elements for flat roof buildings should include parapets with variable
height and/or changes in setback. Where possible, rooftop areas are encouraged to be used
for public or private outdoor space.
4. Sloped Roofs: when sloped roofs are used, at least one of the following elements should
be incorporated into the design including projecting gables, hips, horizontal/vertical breaks, or
other similar techniques. Roof shapes should be an integral part of the building architecture
and create interesting and varied appearances.
5. Bright Colors: intense, bright, or fluorescent colors should not be used as the predominant
color on any wall, or roof of any primary or accessory structure.
6. Building Materials: exterior building facades should exhibit high levels of design, detailing
and material quality. A mix of high quality compatible materials is strongly encouraged on all
facades facing streets, or other public spaces or areas. Buildings should be constructed of
durable, high-quality materials such as: brick, stone, architectural pre-cast concrete,
architecturally cast concrete, case stone, integrally colored split or ground face concrete
masonry units, stucco or EIFS (exterior insulated finishing system), architectural metal, wood,
lap siding, or any combination of the materials listed .
• 7. Scaling: building facades should include a combination of details to enhance the
architectural interest. For example, use brickwork to create unique elements, or mix materials
of varying depth to provide visual interest.
The Foundry Site Plan is proposing the following:
1. Multi-family development
a. Maximum building height: 46'-0"
b. Setbacks: The building has a setback of 10'-0", balconies will protrude into the 5'
setback, but will not encroach into any setback.
c. Density: 32.8 dwelling units per acre
2. Landscaping: A landscaping plan has been provided (page 8 of 9). The Landscape
Requirement Chart indicates that the requirement for landscaping is 8%. The Unified
Development Code (UDC) has a requirement of 8% for industrial zone districts, and 25% for
multi-family residential. The actual amount of landscaping provided for the Foundry is 25%.
Staff has no issues with the amount of landscaping provided .
3. Parking: Proposed parking for the Foundry is 1.31 spaces per unit, for a total of 92 spaces .
The UDC requires 1.5 spaces per unit, plus 1 visitor space per each 5 units, for a total of 119
for a difference of 27 spaces. However, Sand Creek PUD District was approved with a
•
reduction in parking for multi-family projects. Staff has no issues with the amount of parking
provided.
3
4. Public Land Dedication: The park fee in-lieu fee for the development will be $27,025.
5. Architectural Standards: The proposed Foundry Site Plan meets all architectural standards
as outlined above.
CITY DEPARTMENT AND DIVISION REVIEW:
The applicants had a pre-application meeting with staff in August 2015. Issues that were
identified during the pre-application meeting were addressed by the applicant and the final
PUD packets were submitted to staff on September 28, 2015. The final plans were reviewed
by City of Englewood departments and the following comments were made:
Building:
The City of Englewood has adopted the following codes with amendments:
2012 International Building Code and Appendix I -Patio Covers
2012 International Residential Code, Appendices H -Patio Covers and M -Home Day Care
2012 International Energy Conservation Code
2012 International Plumbing Code
2012 International Mechanical Code
2012 International Fuel Gas Code
2012 International Fire Code
2011 National Electrical Code
ICC/ANSI A117.1 -2009 Accessibility Standards
Engineering:
Transportation easements for the sidewalk and emergency vehicle access may be dedicated
by plat or by a separate document.
Detention easement (private) to be dedicated on plat. Plat shall contain standard Detention
Pond notes from Englewood Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (ESDCM) section 6.3 (Ba and
Sb).
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The Foundry Site Plan of the Sand Creek PUD will bring additional building permit revenue as well as
use tax and park fee in lieu revenue as well as new property tax.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
The Foundry Site Plan of the Sand Creek PUD
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission Findings of Fact
Bill for Ordinance
4
•
•
•
C T y 0 F
COMMUNITY
f,
ENGLEWOOD
DEVELOPMENT
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
THRU: Michael Flaherty, Interim Community Development Director
Harold Stitt, Senior Planner
FROM: Audra L. Kirk, Planner II
DATE: November 3, 2015
SUBJECT: Case ZON2015-003 -Public Hearing
PUD Site Plan Approval
APPLICANT:
SW Development Group, LLC
1616 1 t" Street, #362
Denver, CO 80202
PROPERTY OWNER:
Sand Creek Investors, L.L.C
3002 South Huron Street
Englewood, CO 80110
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
601 West Bates Avenue
Englewood, CO 80110
REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting approval of the Foundry Site Plan within the Sand Creek PUD
(Planned Unit Development). The Sand Creek PUD District Plan was brought before the
Planning and Zoning Commission on November 20, 2012 and forwarded to City Council
with a recommendation for approval. The Sand Creek PUD District Plan was approved by
Council on February 4, 2013 with the condition that the final PUD Site Plan receive
approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Department of Community Development recommends approval of Sand Creek PUD
(the Foundry) Site Plan, and forwarding to Council with the recommendation to approve.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION NORTH PROPERTY:
THAT PART OF LOT l GENERAL IRON WORKS SUB DESC AS BEG AT THE SW COR OF
SD LOT TH ALG CURVE TO LEFT 201.64 FT TH NE 297.55 FT TH ALG CURVE RT 73.2 FT
TH NE 512.81 FT TH SE 265.47 FT TH S 53.29 FT TH ALG CURVE RT 47.52 FT TH SW
1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, Colorado 80110 PHONE 303-762-2342 FAX 303-783-6895
www.englewoodgov.org
116.33 FT TH W 28.26 FT TH S 656.37 FT TO THE SECOR OF SD LOT TH W 734.44 FT
TO BEG GENERAL IRON WORKS SUB
ZONE DISTRICT:
Sand Creek PUD
PROPERTY LOCATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USE:
The Foundry site is a 2.13 acre parcel located on the south east portion of the Sand Creek
PUD. The Sand Creek PUD is located adjacent to the RTD Light Rail line between West
Bates Avenue and just north of West Amherst Avenue. Land directly to the west is the RTD
Light Rail tracks and the BSNF railroad tracks and further west beyond South Santa Fe Drive
is an industrial zone district and the Englewood/Littleton Waste Water Treatment Plant.
Surrounding land to the east is a combination of 1-1 (light industrial) and R-2-B {single and
multi-family) zone districts. This area is a mixture of industrial uses, single and multi-family
housing as well as non-conforming residential units in the industrial districts. To the North is•
the RTD maintenance facility zoned 1-2 (heavy industrial).
PUD SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCEDURE:
Approval of a PUD Site Plan requires the applicant to hold a pre-application meeting with
staff, and a neighborhood meeting with owners and tenants located within 1,000 feet of the
proposed PUD. After the neighborhood meeting, a formal submittal is made to the City and
reviewed by City departments. Public hearings are held before the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council. If the PUD Site Plan is approved there is a 30 day
referendum time period before permits can be granted. •
BACKGROUND:
The Planned Unit Development is a rezoning process that establishes specific zoning and
site planning criteria to meet the needs of a specific development proposal that may not be
accommodated within existing zoning development regulations. A PUD rezoning provides
the opportunity for unified development control for multiple properties or multiple uses.
The Sand Creek PUD District Plan was approved on February 4, 2013, by City Council.
The purpose of Sand Creek PUD District Plan was to change the properties Permitted
Principal Uses to allow residential uses in addition to the industrial, office and retail uses
allowed in the industrial zone districts.
The Sand Creek PUD parcel is 10.55 acres and was formerly occupied by General Iron
Works {GIW). RTD acquired the northern portion of the GIW parcel for its maintenance
facility in 2002. Sand Creek acquired the southern portion of the GIW parcel in 2010.
Parcels have been zoned industrial since the first zoning was put into place in 1940.
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARY:
Pursuant to the Unified Development Code PUD procedure, the applicant conducted a
neighborhood meeting on Thursday, September 24, 2015 .. Notice of the neighborhood
meeting was mailed to owners and tenants of property located within l 000 feet of the
proposed PUD property. A meeting summary is attached (See Exhibit A). •
2
..
•
CITY DEPARTMENT AND DIVISION REVIEW:
The applicants had a pre-application meeting with staff in August 2015. Issues that were
identified during the pre-application meeting were addressed by the applicant and the final
PUD packets were submitted to staff on September 28, 2015. The final plans were
reviewed by City of Englewood departments and the following comments were made:
Building:
The City of Englewood has adopted the following codes with amendments:
2012 International Building Code and Appendix I -Patio Covers
2012 International Residential Code, Appendices H -Patio Covers and M -Home Day Care
2012 International Energy Conservation Code
2012 International Plumbing Code
2012 International Mechanical Code
2012 International Fuel Gas Code
2012 International Fire Code
201 l National Electrical Code
ICC/ ANSI All 7.1 -2009 Accessibility Standards
Engineering:
Transportation easements for the sidewalk and emergency vehicle access may be dedicated
by plat or by a separate document.
Detention easement (private) to be dedicated on plat. Plat shall contain standard
Detention Pond notes from Englewood Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (ESDCM) section
6.3 (8a and 8b).
Community Development:
The Sand Creek PUD District Plan changed the Permitted Principal Uses to allow residential
uses in addition to the currently allowed industrial, office and retail uses .
Fire Marshal: Comments pending
The Sand Creek PUD District Plan was approved with the following:
A. Developmental standards:
1. Multi-family development:
a. Maximum building height: 75'-0"
b . Setbacks: All PUD setbacks for multi-family use shall be 5'-0"
c. Density: Maximum 45 dwelling units per acre (45 DU/ACRE)
d. Floor area/unit: Minimum 550 square feet
e. Maximum floor area ratio: None
f. Minimum open space {includes sidewalks): 25%
g. Minimum lot with: None
2. Landscaping:
a. A complete landscape plan shall be provided at time of submittal of final site
plan.
..,
.)
.. r •
3. Parking:
a. Parking guidelines will be prepared based on future development use and will be
submitted with a final site plan and will follow Title 16, Englewood Unified
Development Code. Reduction of parking may be proposed for multi-family.
4. Public Land Dedication Requirements:
a. Parks, trails, and open space land dedication shall be determined by separate
agreement at time of final site plan.
B. Architectural Standards:
Form and materials for multi-family housing shall harmonize with the adjacent residential
buildings and be considerate of neighboring buildings. Submitted with the proposed
PUD are example photographs indicating the general level of design quality,
finishes and materials to be incorporated in the project.
1. Facades: exterior walls greater than SO feet in length should break any flat, monolithic
facade with discernible architectural elements. Building designs, rooflines, or facade
treatments that are monotonous are strongly discouraged. Building facades oriented to
the street or public space should provide architectural variety and scale by
incorporating elements such as bay windows, doorways, entrances and windows,
balconies, cornices, columns, vertical plane breaks, and other types of architectural
detailing to provide visual interest. •
2. 360-degree: a building's special architectural features and treatments shall not be
restricted to a single facade. All sides of a building open to view by the public, ,
shall display a similar level of quality and architectural interest. Architectural features
such as windows, awnings, projections, reveals, changes in pattern, and trellises should
be used on all sides for visual interest. The dimensions of base, middle, and top
should be carried around from the primary facades to the side and rear of the
building.
3. Flat Roofs: design elements for flat roof buildings should include parapets with variable
height and/or changes in setback. Where possible, rooftop areas are encouraged to be
used for public or private outdoor space.
4. Sloped Roofs: when sloped roofs are used, at least one of the following elements
should be incorporated into the design including projecting gables, hips, horizontal/vertical
breaks, or other similar techniques. Roof shapes should be an integral part of the building
architecture and create interesting and varied appearances.
5. Bright Colors: intense, bright, or fluorescent colors should not be used as the
predominant color on any wall, or roof of any primary or accessory structure.
4
•
•
•
6. Building Materials: exterior building facades should exhibit high levels of design,
detailing and material quality. A mix of high quality compatible materials is strongly
encouraged on all facades facing streets, or other public spaces or areas. Buildings should
be constructed of durable, high-quality materials such as: brick, stone, architectural pre-cast
concrete, architecturally cast concrete, case stone, integrally colored split or ground face
concrete masonry units, stucco or EIFS (exterior insulated finishing system), architectural
metal, wood, lap siding, or any combination of the materials listed .
7. Scaling: building facades should include a combination of details to enhance the
architectural interest. For example, use brickwork to create unique elements, or mix
materials of varying depth to provide visual interest.
The Foundry Site Plan is proposing the following:
1. Multi-family development
a. Maximum building height: 46'-0"
b. Setbacks: The building has a setback of 10'-0", balconies will protrude into the 5'
setback, but will not encroach into any setback.
c. Density: 32.8 dwelling units per acre
2. Landscaping: A landscaping plan has been provided (page 8 of 9). The Landscape
Requirement Chart indicates that the requirement for landscaping is 8%. The Unified
Development Code (UDC) has a requirement of 8% for industrial zone districts, and 25%
for multi-family residential. The actual amount of landscaping provided for the Foundry is
25%. Staff has no issues with the amount of landscaping provided.
3. Parking: Proposed parking for the Foundry is 1.31 spaces per unit, for a total of 92
spaces. The UDC requires 1.5 spaces per unit, plus 1 visitor space per each 5 units, for a
total of 119 for a difference of 27 spaces. However, Sand Creek PUD District was
approved with a reduction in parking for multi-family projects. Staff has no issues with the
amount of parking provided.
4. Public Land Dedication: The park fee in-lieu fee for the development will be $27,025 .
5. Architectural Standards: The proposed Foundry Site Plan meets all architectural
standards as outlined above.
Process: The process as outlined in the Sand Creek PUD District Plan specifies site plan
approval through a public hearing by the Planning and Zoning Commission as well as City
Council
SUMMARY:
The applicant is proposing approval of 70 units at the south-east corner of the Sand Creek
PUD. The applicant has met or exceeded all requirements in the Sand Creek PUD District
Plan. The Foundry Site Plan must be approved by Planning and Zoning Commission as well
as City Council.
5
' .
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS:
The Commission must determine if the PUD Site Plan is consistent with the Englewood
2003 Comprehensive Plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission can approve, approve
with conditions or deny the proposed PUD.
PUD District Plan
The Site Plan sets forth the zoning regulations under which the proposed development will
occur.
1. The PUD Site Plan is, or is not, in conformance with the District Plan requirements and the
Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed PUD Site Plan is in conformance with the District Plan and the
Comprehensive Plan. Section 5: Housing, Goal 1 states, "Promote a balanced mix
of housing opportunities serving the needs of all current and future Englewood
Citizens". Objective 1-3 states, "Encourage housing investments that improve the
housing mix, including both smaller and larger unit sizes, and a wider range of
housing types, including single-family, duplex, town home, and condominium units".
2. All required documents, drawings, referrals, recommendations, and approvals have been
received.
•
All appropriate documents concerning Sand Creek PUD Site Plan (the Foundry) •
have been received.
3. The PUD Site Plan is consistent with adopted and generally accepted standards of
development in the City of Englewood.
The Sand Creek PUD Site Plan (the Foundry) is consistent with accepted
development standards established by the City of Englewood.
4. The PUD Site Plans are substantially consistent with the goals, objectives, design
guidelines, policies and any other ordinance, law or requirement of the City.
Sand Creek PUD Site Plans are in conformance with all other ordinances, laws and
requirements of the City.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A: Sand Creek PUD Site Plan (the Foundry)
Exhibit B: Neighborhood Meeting Summary -September 25, 2015
Exhibit C: Letter from CHFA dated July 14, 2014
6
•
•
jlfll]
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
November 3, 2015
I. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers of the Englewood Civic Center, Chair Fish presiding.
Present Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton , Knoth, Fish
Absent: Bleile, Madrid, Townley, Pittinos (All Excused)
Staff:
Also Present:
~i
Mike Flaherty, Deputy City Manager
Harold Stitt, Senior Planner
Brook Bell, Planner II
Audra Kirk, Planner II
John Voboril, Planner II , Long Range Planning
Dugan Comer, Deputy City Attorney
Scott Yeates, SW Development Group
Chad Holsinger, Shopworks Architecture
Bob Wilson, Shopworks Architecture
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• October 20, 2015 Minutes
Knoth moved:
Freemire seconded: TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 20, 2015 MINUTES
Chair Fish asked if there were any modifications or corrections. There were none.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Motion carried.
~Ql
Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Fish
None
None
Bleile, Madrid, Townley
Ill. Public Hearing Case #ZON2015-009 Sand Creek Planned Unit Development Site Plan approval
Knoth moved;
King seconded:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT: a
Staff Testimony
To open the public hearing for Case #ZON2015-019 Sand Creek Planned Unit
Development Site Plan approval
Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Fish
None
None
Bleile, Madrid Townley
Audra Kirk, Planner II, was sworn in. Ms. Kirk reviewed the history of the PUD (Planned Unit Development)
located at 601 West Bates Avenue. The PUD District Plan was approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission in November, 2012. The applicant has prepared a site plan for approval by the Commission
and met all requirements for notification and neighborhood meetings. The Site Plan meets or exceeds all
requirements set forth in the PUD.
Mr. Brick asked Ms. Kirk if she thinks that the development will have a negative effect on the neighborhood.
Ms. Kirk responded that it is her opinion that the development will have a positive impact on the area.
JO ~
Applicant Testimony
Mr. Scott Yeates, 1616171h Street, Suite 362, Denver, was sworn in. Mr. Yeates thanked the Commission
for the opportunity to present his proposed project. Mr. Yeates provided a PowerPoint presentation with
images of the proposed project including the survey and elevations.
The project will consist of 70 apartments, 42 one-bedroom and 28 two bedroom units, on the southeast
corner of the property. The rental rates will be income restricted.
The project meets many objectives of the Comprehensive Plan the Light Rail Corridor Plan by providing a
mix of housing to accommodate various life stages, workforce rental units and proximity to public
transportation.
D
The parking ratio will be 1.31 parking spaces per unit which exceeds the 1: 1 ratio recommended in the Light
Rail Corridor Study. Twenty guest parking spaces as well as outdoor and indoor bicycle storage will be
provided. The apartments will be in a single three story building. The landscaping will exceed minimum
0 irements. Mr. Yeates described the tenant amenities that will be provided to residents.
The building form will reflect the original General Iron Works site with architectural details coordinating with
the theme. Materials will include reclaimed masonry, metal panels and steel stair course. The color palette
will be primarily neutral and a large mural will be completed on one face of the building with assistance from
the Englewood Cultural Arts Commission.
D
The proposed development meets all requirements of the PUD. Groundbreaking is scheduled for April
2016 with occupancy May 2017. u
Mr. Brick asked about the purpose of the hearing . Mr. Yeates explained that at the time the PUD was
formed, the owners did not have a developer for the property when the District Plan was approved. As part
of the two•step PUD approval process, he is presenting the Site Plan for approval by the Commission. Ms .
Kirk explained that the District Plan outlines the development requirements.
la!.= L\ir:511
Mr. Kinton asked if the open space requirement includes the parking area. Mr. Yeates responded that it
does not include the parking area.
irqli ,,!lt';al
Public Testimony
No members of the public testified at the hearing.
:igi .~
Ms. Kirk clarified that the Commission approved the PUD in November 2013 with final approval by City
Council in May 2014.
Brick moved;
Knoth seconded: To close the public hearing for Case #ZON2015•019 Sand Creek Planned Unit
Development Site Plan Approval
AYES:
NAYS:
Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth , Fish
None
2
•
•
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Bleile, Madrid, Townley
tllQ'U ~
Knoth moved;
King seconded: To approve Case #ZON2015-009 Sand Creek Planned Unit Development Site Plan as
Hl
written and forward to City Council with a favorable recommendation.
Mr. Brick-The plans represent conformance with the zoning outlined in the PUD
Mr. Freemire -This will be a marked improvement and meets all criteria for the development of the PUD.
Mr. King -The project meets all criteria of the PUD and is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Kinton -He initially had concerns when the PUD was originally approved but believes it has turned
out extremely well and meets many objective of the Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Knoth -He is glad to see the project moving forward.
Chair Fish -He agrees with the previous comments. He is excited to see something happening. im
AYES: Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Madrid, Fish
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Bleile, Madrid, Townley
Motion passes 6-0
;ni
~
Ill. STUDY SESSION 2013-03 Comprehensive Plan Update
John Voboril, Planner II, distributed the Commissioner's comments to all members present. The comments
were condensed to include the most substantive comments. Mr. Freemire had previously requested the
Request for Proposal (RFP) that was issued for the Comprehensive Plan update. Mr. Stitt stated that staff
would like to have clarification on some of the comments. Mr. Freemire objected to the fact that the
comments were edited and asked what criteria was used to audit the comments. Chair Fish requested a
full copy of all comments be sent to the Commissioners.
:.ViJli
Mr. Freemire asked if the goals of the RFP were met and requested an analysis to be presented at the
November 17th meeting. Chair Fish requested a document that would outline any changes in the draft plan
that are made based on feedback from the Commission and the public. Mr. Brick added that the
Commissioners can comment at the City Council public hearing. Mr. Stitt reiterated that comments will be
taken up to the time of the City Council public hearing as well.
DI
Mr. Brick asked about establishing a work program based on the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Stitt responded
that the final Comprehensive Plan will be available approximately a month after it is approved by City
Council and a work plan will be established in December of 2016. Mr. Flaherty suggested that the
Commission take testimony at the public hearing and based on that testimony and the other comments
received, the Commission make their official recommendations to City Council as a body.
iOi
Mr. Flaherty explained that the Commission does not have to approve the draft Comprehensive Plan at the
public hearing but can defer the vote for approval to a later date. Mr. Freemire asked about the goals of
the project; Mr. Voboril explained that the City Council expressed a desire to see a plan with actionable
items. Mr. Voboril explained that staff asked the consultants to perform a cursory review of the existing
plan goals and objectives, make minor updated and edit, and carry these goals and objectives forward in
the updated plan. Mr. Knoth asked how many items from the previous plan were used in developing the
plan, Mr. Voboril responded that the majority of items from the previous plan were incorporated. ·ai ~~
Mr. Voboril reviewed the comments that were submitted by the Commissioners. Mr. Kinton commented
that the intersection of Belleview and Broadway is problematic in that it is not pedestrian friendly nor is it
3
,.
easy to navigate by car. An alternative route may be something to consider. Mr. Kinton also commented
on the light industrial area near Baker Park. Consideration could be given to changing the zoning in the
neighborhood area. Mr. Stitt responded that he did not hear those concerns at the neighborhood meeting
but they desired investment by the City.
IQ\l
I~
Mr. Knoth commented on the statistics in the report and expressed that he would like to see more
comparisons to Englewood's peer cities. Mr. Fish added that he feels that the statistics regarding
population were incorrect; Mr. Voboril agreed and after additional research found some of the numbers
were not accurate. Mr. Fish noted that the statistics are stated throughout the document. Mr. Knoth cited
a lack of large goals and felt that the recommendations were mostly small steps. Mr. Knoth commented on
the lack of objectives for education while one of the goals is to attract employers who will require an
educated work force. Mr. Voboril is aware of the lack of information about education . . g
Mr. Freemire commented on the lack of information regarding city services including administration. He
also expressed concern about the plan's assertion that it could be a twenty-year plan and in his experience
a ten year plan is more common. It is his opinion that in order to differentiate the City from other cities with
the same goals, an actionable plan needs to be in place to reach that goal. a
Discussion ensued regarding the processing and integration of comments into the plan. Mr. Flaherty
advised the Commission that the Parks and Recreation Department is developing a master plan that will
become an addendum to the Comprehensive Plan.
H
Mr. Fish suggested that there are areas of the Plan that are in conflict that need to be examined. He
encouraged staff to place the important items in the front of the document. Mr. Voboril asked Mr. Fish about
his comments regarding the catalytic areas; Mr. Fish responded that it is the market that will drive
improvement in these areas, not the City. The City can facilitate action and remove barriers to improvement.
For strategy 2.1 and 2.2, Mr. Voboril asked for clarification on his comment regarding establishing
neighborhood character. Mr. Fish stated that he would like to have that strategy eliminated . Mr. Flaherty
informed the Commission that the consultants heard the comments from a neighborhood meeting and
Dried accordingly.
Mr. Brick thanked Mr. Flaherty for his comments regarding internal city services and expressed that he
agrees that it is important for the Comprehensive Plan to be in alignment with the goals of City
administration and staff.
]f!J
IV. PUBLIC FORUM
No members of the public were present at the meeting. g
V. ATTORNEY'S CHOICE
o
1
~rv City Attorney Comer did not have any comments for the Commission,
VI. STAFF'S CHOICE
Mr. Flaherty stated that the Commission will have materials coming to them soon regarding the sign code
regulations. He outlined the history and timeline of the development of the new Comprehensive Plan. He
asked the Commission to consider how much additional lime they want to have for consideration of the
Comprehensive Plan in light of their regular workload . He reminded the Commissioners that they will have
a public hearing on November 171h and that there will be additional comments received on the plan after
the hearing.
4
•
•
•
Mr. Bell informed the Commission that the decision on case 2015·003 4635 South Pearl Street Urban Lot
Development is being appealed to City Council on November 16, 2015. The letters received from the
three appellants will be forwarded to the Commissioners.
D
VII. COMMISSIONER'S CHOICE
Mr. Brick expressed that he has appreciation for the work that has gone into the Comprehensive Plan and
is willing to continue working with staff.
Mr. Fish asked when the new City Council will be sworn in; Mr. Flaherty informed the Commission that
they will be sworn in at the regular meeting November 16th•
Mr. Kinton agreed with previous comments that the Commission has not spent enough time examining
the Comprehensive Plan.
The meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m.
/s/ Julie Bailey , Recording Secretary
s
' ' ' ... ;I
•
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF CASE #ZON2015-003, )
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS )
AND RECOMMENDATIONS RELATING )
TO THE SAND CREEK PLANNED UNIT )
DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN )
)
)
INITIATED BY: )
SW Development Group, LLC )
1616 17th Street, #362 )
Denver, CO 80202 )
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF THE
CITY PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION
Commission Members Present: Brick, Fish, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth
Commission Members Absent: Bleile, Townley, Madrid
This matter was heard before the City Planning and Zoning Commission on November 3,
2015 in the City Council Chambers of the Englewood Civic Center .
Testimony was received from staff. The Commission received notice of Public Hearing,
-the Staff Report, and a copy of the proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) Site Plan
which were incorporated into and made a part of the record of the Public Hearing.
After considering the statements of the witness and reviewing the pertinent documents,
the members of the City Planning and Zoning Commission made the following Findings
and Conclusions.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THAT the Public Hearing on Case ZON2015-003 Sand Creek Planned Unit
Development Site Plan was brought before the Planning and Zoning Commission
on November 3, 2015.
2. THAT notice of the Public Hearing was published in the Englewood Herald on
October 15, 2015, and was on the City of Englewood website from October 22,
2015 to November 3, 2015.
3. THAT the staff report was made part of the record.
4. THAT the Sand Creek PUD District plan was approved by the Planning and Zoning
-Commission on November 20, 2012, and approved by City Council on February 4,
1
... i', , ti
2013 with the condition that the final PUD Site Plan receive approval from the
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council.
5. THAT the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on September 24, 2015.
6. THAT the applicant is proposing approval of 70 units at the south-east corner of
the Sand Creek PUD.
7. THAT the final plans were reviewed by City of Englewood departments in August
2015, including Building, Engineering, Community Development and Fire and was
found to meet or exceed all requirements in the Sand Creek PUD District Plan.
8. THAT the PUD Site Plan sets forth the zoning regulations under which the
proposed development will occur.
CONCLUSIONS
1. THAT the proposed Sand Creek PUD Site Plan is in conformance with the District
Plan previously approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City
Council.
2. THAT the proposed development will be an improvement over the current use(s).
3. THAT the Sand Creek PUD Site Plan is consistent with adopted and generally
accepted standards of development in the City of Englewood.
4. THAT the Sand Creek PUD Site Plan is in conformance with the Englewood
Comprehensive Plan by providing a balanced mix of housing opportunities serving
the needs of current and future Englewood Citizens.
DECISION
THEREFORE, it is the decision of the City Planning and Zoning Commission that Case
#ZON2015-0-003 Sand Creek Planned Unit Development Site Plan should be referred to
the City Council with a favorable recommendation .
This decision was reached upon a vote on a motion made at the meeting of the City
Planning and Zoning Commission on November 3, 2015 by Knoth, seconded by King,
which motion states:
•
•
To approve Case #ZON2015-003 Sand Creek Planned Unit Development
Site Plan and forward to City Council with a favorable recommendation. •
Page 2 of3
•
•
•
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Fish
None
None
Bleile, Madrid, Townley
Motion carried.
These Findings and Conclusions are effective as of the meeting on November, 3, 2015.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
3
..
•
•
•
Foundry Neighborhood Meeting 9/24/15
6:30 p.m.
Mayflower Congregational Church
3001 South Acoma Street
Approximately 35 -40 people attended the meeting.
Scott Yeates, Bryant Winslow and Aaron Foy were present to discuss their projects.
Scott Yeates spoke for a few minutes on the Foundry project. He state that the project would be
70 units on 2 acres. There will be 42, one bedrooms and :?8, two bedrooms.
Following are some questions from the publi c, and answers provided by the applicants:
Q: What is the price point?
The one bedroom will rent for $650, the two bedroom will rent for $950.
Q: Will it be low income?
It will be rent restricted, to renters making less than $40,000.
Q: Where is parking1
Parking is in the back, all surface parking. There will be 91 spaces.
Q: Does the stairwell face north, isn't that going to be cold and snowy?
It does face north. Snow will not be a problem with a good maintenance crew.
Q: Is visitor parking designated?
No, it is not.
Q: Where rent restrictions placed prior lo current market?
Yes, but we still feel that there is a high demand for it.
Q: Does lhe rent restrictions cause any impact on emergency services?
No.
Q: What is the construction time-frame?
Break ground in April 2016 with a completion date of 2017.
Q: Where will overflow parking take place?
We feel that on-site parking is sufficient, however any overflow parking will be along Bates
and Elati.
Q: What is the target audience, young and old?
Both.
Q: What are the odds of this happening?
100%.
Q: Does the parking go over the remediated area?
A portion does, that will receive 6'' -8" of asphalt.
Q: Will a percentage of these be low income?
No, we feel that the rental price is already low.
Q: Will there be a light rail station?
No, the cost has gotten to high.
Q: How is this going to increase my properly value?
We are investing and driving others to invest.
Q: Explain the other unils.
Aaron explained his projecL 161 units. Sinsle family will be 1800 s.f. and $400,000.
Duplexes will be 1100 -1600 s.f.
Construction is planned to start next year.
Q: Will lhe cul-de-sac go through?
No.
Q: Who gives final approval?
The City does.
Q: Will there be planned green space?
Yes there is a fair amount.
Can it be moved lo be more cenlral?
Discussion ensued regarding type of vegetation.
Q: What is the quality level?
We will meet the requirements for LEED Silver certified, however we will not apply, due to
costs. We will be 65% H.E.R.S. (Home Energy Rating System)
Q: Will there be solar?
No, but there is an opportunity with the flat roofs.
Q: What does a playground mean to you?
Designated fixtures.
Q: Will you approve Section 8?
Yes we will.
Q: Will there be trails and bike connection?
Aaron • yes, we will be working with the city on this.
Q: Will there be outdoor art?
Yes, we would like to have a call for artists for a mural that could be changed every five
years ..
Q: How tall are lhe condos?
Aaron -four stories
•
•
•
r •
Q: Where will parking for construction crews be?
On-site.
Q: Will each house have a garage?
Aaron• yes.
Q: Will they have basements?
Aaron -The single family and duplexes will.
Q: Will laxpayer's money go into it?
No, I used tax credits issued by CHFA .
•
~0 3 8..0~-~~z ________ _
wHi'TtJ a1,--m 2/J f/llJ 752.2.. Whittle. col
_____ Kae_~~ 3(9$ · q l3 •~d-1;1-KtU.str,dda..rd @00<.c.. ~h.
"j -
Jbomps.on 30 .5 -'J ftt-2 7b2
5 oL t:? /YJP rl 3 e,3r f1r_3_) ___ 9 _7' ___ y _____ _
J(} J-~r-'ff' ~
dtoa :a::e.Cf .wrn ---e
•
'' C T y 0 F ENGLEWOOD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
THRU: Michael Flaherty, Interim Community Development Director
Harold Stitt, Senior Planner
FROM: Audra L. Kirk, Planner II
DATE: November 3, 201 S
SUBJECT: Case ZON2015-003 -Public Hearing
PUD Site Plan Approval
APPLICANT:
SW Development Group, LLC
1616 1 t" Street, #362
Denver, CO 80202
PROPERTY OWNER:
Sand Creek Investors, L.L.C
3002 South Huron Street
Englewood, CO 80110
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
601 West Bates Avenue
Englewood, CO 80110
REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting approval of the Foundry Site Plan within the Sand Creek PUD
(Planned Unit Development). The Sand Creek PUD District Plan was brought before the
Planning and Zoning Commission on November 20, 2012 and forwarded to City Council
with a recommendation for approval. The Sand Creek PUD District Plan was approved by
Council on February 4, 2013 with the condition that the final PUD Site Plan receive
approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Department of Community Development recommends approval of Sand Creek PUD
(the Foundry) Site Plan, and forwarding to Council with the recommendation to approve.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION NORTH PROPERTY:
TMAT PART OF LOT 1 GENERAL IRON WORKS SUB DESC AS BEG AT THE SW COR OF
SO LOT TH ALG CURVE TO LEFT 201 .64 FT TH NE :!97.55 FT TH ALG CURVE RT 73.2 FT
TH NE 512.81 FT TH SE 265.47 Ff TH S 53.29 FT TH ALG CURVE RT 47.52 FT TH SW
1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, Colorado 80110 PHONE 303-762·2342 FAX 303-783-6895
www.englewoodcov org
116.33 FT TH W 28.26 FT TH S 656.3 7 FT TO THE SE COR OF SD LOT TH W 734.44 FT
TO BEG GENERAL IRON WORKS SUB
ZONE DISTRICT:
Sand Creek PUD
PROPERTY LOCATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USE:
The Foundry site is a 2.13 acre parcel located on the south east portion of the Sand Creek
PUD. The Sand Creek PUD is located adjacent to the RTD Light Rail line between West
Bates Avenue and just north of West Amherst Avenue. Land directly to the west is the RTD
Light Rail tracks and the BSNF railroad tracks and further west beyond South Santa Fe Drive
is an industrial zone district and die Englewood/Littleton Waste Water Treatment Plant
Surrounding land to the east is a combination of 1-1 (light industrial) and R-2-8 (single and
multi-family} zone districts. This area is a mixture of industrial uses, single and multi-family
housing as well as non-conforming residential units in the industrial districts. To the North is
the RTD maintenance facility zoned 1-2 (heavy industrial).
PUD SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCEDURE:
•
Approval of a PUD Site Plan requires the applicant to hold a pre-application meeting with
staff, and a neighborhood meeting with owners and tenants located within 1,000 feet of the
proposed PUD. After the neighborhood meeting, a formal submittal is made to the City and
reviewed by City departments. Public hearings are held before the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council. If the PUD Site Plan is approved there is a 30 day A
referendum time period before permits can be granted. W
BACKGROUND:
The Planned Unit Development is a rezoning process that establishes specific zoning and
site planning criteria to meet the needs of a specific development proposal that may not be
accommodated within existing zoning development regulations. A PUD rezoning provides
the opportunity for unified development control for multiple properties or multiple uses.
The Sand Creek PUD District Plan was approved on February 4, 2013, by City Council.
The purpose of Sand Creek PUD District Plan was to change the properties Permitted
Principal Uses to allow residential uses in addition to the industrial, office and retail uses
allowed in the industrial zone districts.
The Sand Creek PUD parcel is 10.55 acres and was formerly occupied by General Iron
Works (GIW). RTD acquired the northern portion of the GIW parcel for its maintenance
facility in 2002. Sand Creek acquired the southern portion of the GIW parcel in 2010.
Parcels have been zoned industrial since the first zoning was put into place in 1940.
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARY:
Pursuant to the Unified Development Code PUD procedure, the applicant conducted a
neighborhood meeting on Thursday, September 24, 2015 .. Notice of the neighborhood
meeting was mailed to owners and tenants of property located within 1000 feet of the
proposed PUD property. A meeting summary is attached (See Exhibit A).
2 •
-CITY DEPARTMENT AND DIVISION REVIEW:
•
The applicants had a pre-application meeting with staff in August 2015 . Issues that were
identified during the pre-application meeting were addressed by the applicant and the final
PUD packets were submitted to staff on September 28, 2015. The final plans were
reviewed by City of Englewood departments and the following comments were made:
Building:
The City of Englewood has adopted the following codes with amendments:
2012 International Building Code and Appendix I • Patio Covers
2012 International Residential Code, Appendices H -Patio Covers and M • Home Day Care
2012 International Energy Conservation Code
2012 International Plumbing Code
2012 International Mechanical Code
2012 International Fuel Gas Code
2012 International Fire Code
2011 National Electrical Code
ICC/ANSI A 117.1 -2009 Accessibility Standards
Engineering:
Transportation easements for the sidewalk and emergency vehicle access may be dedicated
by plat or by a separate document.
Detention easement (private) to be dedicated on plat. Plat shall contain standard
Detention Pond notes from Englewood Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (ESDCM) section
6.3 (Ba and 8b).
Community Development:
The Sand Creek PUD District Plan changed the Permitted Principal Uses to allow residential
uses in addition to the currently allowed industrial, office and retail uses.
Fire Marshal: Comments pending
The Sand Creek PUD District Plan was approved with the following:
A. Developmental standards:
1. Multi-family development:
a. Maximum building height: 75'-0"
b. Setbacks: All PUD setbacks for multi-family use shall be 5'-0"
c. Density: Maximum 45 dwelling units per acre (45 DU/ACRE)
d . Floor area/unit: Minimum 550 square feet
e. Maximum floor area ratio: None
f. Minimum open space (includes sidewalks): 25°/u
g. Minimum lot with: None
2. Landscaping:
a. A complete landscape plan shall be provided at time of submittal of final site
plan.
3
3. Parking:
a. Parking guidelines will be prepared based on future development use and will be
submitted with a final site plan and will follow Title 16, Englewood Unified
Development Code. Reduction of parking may be proposed for multi-family.
4. Public Land Dedication Requirements:
a. Parks, trails, and open space land dedication shall be determined by separate
agreement at time of final site plan.
B. Architectural Standards:
Form and materials for multi-family housing shall harmonize with the adjacent residential
buildings and be considerate of neighboring buildings. Submitted with the proposed
PUD are example photographs indicating the general level of design quality,
finishes and materials to be incorporated in the project.
1. Facades: exterior walls greater than 50 feet in length should break any flat, monolithic
facade with discernible architectural elements. Building designs, rooflines, or facade
treatments that are monotonous are strongly discouraged. Building facades oriented to
the street or public space should provide architectural variety and scale by
incorporating elements such as bay windows, doorways, entrances and windows,
balconies, cornices, columns, vertical plane breaks, and other types of architectural
detailing to provide visual interest.
2. 360-degree: a building's special architectural features and treatments shall not be
restricted to a single facade. All sides of a building open to view by the public, ,
shall display a similar level of quality and architectural interest Architectural features
such as windows, awnings, projections, reveals, changes in pattern, and trellises should
be used on all sides for visual interest. The dimensions of base, middle, and top
should be carried around from the primary facades to the side and rear of the
building.
3. Flat Roofs: design elements for flat roof buildings should include parapets with variable
height and/or changes in setback. Where possible, rooftop areas are encouraged to be
used for public or private outdoor space.
4. Sloped Roofs: when sloped roofs are used, at least one of the following elements
should be incorporated into the design including projecting gables, hips, horizontal/vertical
breaks, or other similar techniques. Roof shapes should be an integral part of the building
architecture and create interesting and varied appearances.
5. Bright Colors: intense, bright, or fluorescent colors should not be used as the
predominant color on any wall, or roof of any primary or accessory structure.
4
•
•
-6. Building Materials: exterior building facades should exhibit high levels of design,
detailing and material quality. A mix of high quality compatible materials is strongly
encouraged on all facades facing streets, or other public spaces or areas. Buildings should
be constructed of durable, high-quality materials such as: brick, stone, architectural pre-cast
concrete, architecturally cast concrete, case stone, integrally colored split or ground face
concrete masonry units, stucco or EIFS (exterior insulated finishing system), architectural
metal, wood, lap siding, or any combination of the materials listed.
•
•
7. Scaling: building facades should include a combination of details to enhance the
architectural interest. For example, use brickwork to create unique elements, or mix
materials of varying depth to provide visual interest.
The Foundry Site Plan is proposing the following:
1. Multi-family development
a. Maximum building height: 46'-0"
b. Setbacks: The building has a setback of 10'-0,,, balconies will protrude into the 5'
setback, but will not encroach into any setback.
c. Density: 32.8 dwelling units per acre
2. Landscaping: A landscaping plan has been provided (page 8 of 9). The landscape
Requirement Chart indicates that the requirement for landscaping is 8%. The Unified
Development Code (UDC) has a requirement of 8% for industrial zone districts, and 25%
for multi-family residential. The actual amount of landscaping provided for the Foundry is
25%. Staff has no issues with the amount of landscaping provided.
3. Parking: Proposed parking for the Foundry is 1.31 spaces per unit, for a total of 92
spaces. The UDC requires 1.5 spaces per unit, plus 1 visitor space per each 5 units, for a
total of 119 for a difference of 27 spaces. However, Sand Creek PUD District was
approved with a reduction in parking for multi-family projects. Staff has no issues with the
amount of parking provided.
4. Public Land Dedication; The park fee in-lieu fee for the development will be $27,025.
S. Architectural Standards: The proposed Foundry Site Plan meets all architectural
standards as outlined above.
Process: The process as outlined in the Sand Creek PUO District Plan specifies site plan
approval through a public hearing by the Planning and Zoning Commission as well as City
Council
SUMMARY:
The applicant is proposing approval of 70 units at the south-east corner of the Sand Creek
PUD. The applicant has met or exceeded all requirements in the Sand Creek PUD District
Plan. The Foundry Site Plan must be approved by Planning and Zoning Commission as well
as City Council.
5
. .
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS:
The Commission must determine if the PUD Site Plan is consistent with the Englewood
2003 Comprehensive Plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission can approve, approve
with conditions or deny the proposed PUD.
PU D District Pf an
The Site Plan sets forth the zoning regulations under which the proposed development will
occur.
1. The PUD Site Plan is, or is not, in conformance wich the District Plan requirements and the
Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed PUD Site Plan is in conformance with the District Plan and the
Comprehensive Plan. Section 5: Housing, Goal 1 states, "Promote a balanced mix
of housing opportunities serving the needs of all current and future Englewood
Citizens". Objective 1-3 states, "Encourage housing investments that improve the
housing mix, including both smaller and larger unit sizes, and a wider range of
housing types, including single-family, duplex, town home, and condominium units".
2. All required documents, drawings, referrals, recommendations, and approvals have been
received.
All appropriate documents concerning Sand Creek PUD Site Plan (the Foundry)
have been received.
3. The PUD Site Plan is consistent with adopted and generalfy accepted standards of
development in the City of Englewood.
The Sand Creek PUD Site Plan {the Foundry) is consistent with accepted
development standards established by the City of Englewood.
4. The PUD Sile Plans are substantially consistent with the goals, obiectives, design
guidelines, policies and any other ordinance, law or requirement of the City.
Sand Creek PUD Site Plans are in conformance with all other ordinances, laws and
requirements of the City.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A: Sand Creek PUD Site Plan (the Foundry)
Exhibit B: Neighborhood Meeting Summary -September 25, 2015
Exhibit C: Letter from CHFA dated July 14, 2014
6
. .
•
•
\
•
j!Oll
I~
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
November 3, 2015
I. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 7.00 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers of the Englewood Civic Center, Chair Fish presiding
Present: Brick, Freemire, King, Kinion, Knoth , Fish
Absent: Bleile, Madrid, Townley, Piltinos (All Excused)
Staff:
Also Present:
I~;
Mike Flaherty, Deputy City Manager
Harold Slitt, Senior Planner
Brook Bell, Planner II
Audra Kirk, Planner II
John Voboril, Planner 11, Long Range Planning
Dugan Comer, Oepuly City Attorney
Scott Yeates. SW Development Group
Chad Holsinger, Shopworks Architecture
Bob Wilson, Shopworks Architecture
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• October 20, 2015 Minutes
Knoth moved:
Freemire seconded: TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 20, 2015 MINUTES
Chair Fish asked if there were any modifications or corrections. There were none.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Motion earned.
i~
Brick, Freemlre, King, Kinion, Knoth , Fish
None
None
Bleile, Madrid, Townley
Ill. Public Hearing Case #ZON2015•009 Sand Creek Planned Unit Development Site Plan approval
Knoth moved;
King seconded: To open the public hearing for Case #ZON2015·019 Sand Creek Planned Unit
Development Site Plan approval
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN .
ABSENT: e
Slaff Testimony
Brick, Freemire, King , Kinton, Knoth, Fish
None
None
Bleile, Madrid Townley
Audra Kirk, Planner II, was sworn in. Ms. Kirk reviewed the history of the PUD (Planned Unit Developmenl)
localed at 601 West Bates Avenue . The PUD District Plan was approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission in November, 2012. The applicant has prepared a sile plan ror approval by the Commission
and met all requirements for notificalion and neighborhood meetings . The Site Plan meets or exceeds all
requirements set forth In the PUD .
Mr. Brick asked Ms Kirk if she thinks lhat the development will have a negative effect on the neighborhood .
Ms. Kirk responded that it Is her oplnion that the development will have a positive impact on the area.
llfll l
Applicant Testimony
Mr. Scott Yeates, 161617111 Street, Suite 362, Denver, was sworn in. Mr Yeates thanked the Commission
for the opportunlty to present his proposed project. Mr. Yeates provided a PowerPoint presentation wi th
images of the proposed project including the survey and elevations,
The project will consist or 70 apartments. 42 one-bedroom and 26 IWo bedroom units. on the southeast
comer of the property. The rental rates will be income restricted,
The project meets many objectives of the Comprehensive Plan the Light Rall Corridor Plan by providing a
mix of housing to accommodate various life stages, workforce rental units and proximity to public
transportation.
LO
The parking ratio will be 1.31 parking spaces per unit which exceeds the 1:1 ratio recommended in the Light
Rall Corridor Study. Twenty guest parking spaces as well as outdoor and indoor bicycle storage will be
provided. The apartments will be in a single three story building. The landscaping will exceed m inimum
r~~frements. Mr. Yeates described the tenant amenities that will be provided to residents .
[~
The building form will reflect the original General Iron Works site with archileclUral details coordinating with
the Iheme. Materials will include redaimed masonry, metal panels and steel stair course. The color palette
will be primarily neutral and a large mural will be completed on one face of the building with assistance from
the Englewood Cultural Arts Commission .
l~l
The proposed development meets all requirements of the PUD. Groundbreaking is scheduled for April
2016 with occupancy May 2017.
lQ
Mr. Brick asked about the purpose of the hearing . Mr. Yeates explained that al the time the PUD was
formed, the owners did not have a developer for the property when the District Plan was approved. As part
of the two -step PUD approval process, he is presenting the Sile Plan for approval by the Commission. Ms.
Kirk explained that the District Plan outlines the de11elopmenl requ irements.
l~I
Mr. Kinton asked if the open space requirement includes the parking area. Mr. Yeates responded that it
does not Include the parking area.
lel
Public Testimony
No members of the public testified at the hearing
lEII
Ms. Kirk clarified that the Commission approved the PUD in November 2013 with final approval by City
Council in May 2014.
Brick moved,
Knoth seconded: To close the public hearing for Case #ZON2015-019 Sand Creek Planned Unit
Development Site Plan Approval
AYES:
NAYS:
Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Fish
None
2
I
•
. .
•
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Bleile, Madrid, Townley
~-
Knoth moved,
King seconded: To approve Case #ZON2015-009 Sand Creek Planned Unit Development Site Plan as
~:
written and forward to City Council with a favorable recommendation.
Mr. Brick -The plans represent conformance with the zoning outlined in the PUD
Mr. Freemire -This will be a marked improvement and meets all criteria for the development or the PUO
Mr. King -The project meets all criteria of the PUD and Is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Kinton -He Initially had concerns when the PUD was originally approved but believes il has turned
out extremely well and meets many objective of the Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Knoth -He Is glad to see lhe project moving forward.
Chair Fish -He agrees wilh the previous comments. He is excited lo see something happening. [g
AYES: Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Madrid, Fish
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Bleile, Madrid, Townley
Motion passes 6-0
l~~
Ill. STUDY SESSION 2013-03 Comprehensive Plan Update
John Voboril, Planner II, distributed the Commissioner's comments to all members present. The comments
were condensed to include the most substanUve comments. Mr. Freemire had previously requested the
Request for Proposal (RFP) that was issued for the Comprehensive Plan update. Mr. Stitt staled that staff
would like to have clarification on some of the comments . Mr. Freemire objected to the fact that the
comments were edited and asked what criteria was used to audit the comments. Chair Fish requested a
f~II qopy or an comments be sent to the Commissioners.
L~:
Mr. Freemire asked if the goals of the RFP were met and requested an analysis to be presented at the
November 17111 meeting. Chair Fish requested a document that would outline any changes in the draft plan
that are made based on feedback from the Commission and lhe public. Mr. Brick added that the
Commissioners can comment at the City Council public hearing. Mr. Stitt reiterated that comments will be
taken up to the lime of the City Council public hearing as well.
tlf
Mr. Brick asked about establishing a work program based on the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Stitt responded
that the final Comprehensive Plan will be available approximately a month after it Is approved by City
Council and a work plan will be established in December of 2016. Mr. Flaherty suggested that the
Commission take testimony at the public hearing and based on that testimony and the other comments
received, the Commission make lheir official recommendations to City Council as a body.
lflli
Mr. Flaherty explained that the Commission does not have to approve the draft Comprehensive Plan at the
public hearing bul can defer the vote for approval to a laler date. Mr. Freemire asked about the goals of
the project, Mr. Voboril explained that the City Council expressed a desire to see a plan with actionable
items. Mr. Voboril explained that staff asked the consultants to perform a cursory review of the existing
plan goals and objectives, make minor updated and edit, and carry these goals and objectives forward In
the updated plan. Mr. Knoth asked how many items from the previous plan were used in developing the
p~ Mr. Voboril responded that the majority of Items from the previous plan wer e incorporated.
,~I
Mr. Voboril reviewed the comments that were submitted by the Commissioners. Mr. Kinton commented
that the intersection of Belleview and Broadway is problematic in that it is not pedestrian friendly nor is It
3
easy to navigate by car. An allemalive route may be something to consider. Mr. Kinion also commented
on lhe light industrial area near Baker Park. Consideration could be gi ven lo changing the zoning in the
neighborhood area. Mr. Stitt responded that he did not hear those concerns at the neighborhood meeting
but they desired Jnvestment by the Cily.
teJ:
Mr. Knoth commented on the statistics in the report and expressed that he would like lo see more
comparisons to Englewood's peer cities. Mr .. Fish added that he feels lhal the stalislics regarding
population were incorrect; Mr. Voboril agreed and after additional research found some of the numbers
were not accurate. Mr. Fish noted that the statistics are slated throughout lhe document. Mr. Knoth ciled
a lack of large goals and felt that the recommendations were mostly small steps. Mr. Knoth commented on
the lack of objectives for education while one of lhe goals is to attract employers who will require an
educated work force. Mr. Voboril is aware of the lack of Information about education.
llfll'.
Mr. Freemlre commented on the lack of information regarding city services including administration. He
also expressed concern about lhe plan's assertion that it could be a twenty-year pl an and in his experience
a ten year plan Is more common. It Is his opinion that in order lo differenUate the City from other cities with
the same goals, an actionable plan needs to be in place lo reach that goal.
L.~
Discussion ensued regarding the processing and lntegraUon of comments rnto the plan. Mr. Flaherty
advised the Commission that the Parks and Recreation Department is developing a master plan that will
become an addendum to the Comprehensive Plan.
!el
Mr. Fish suggested that there are areas of the Plan that are in conflict that need to be examined. He
encouraged staff lo place the Important items in the front of the document. Mr. Voboril asked Mr. Fish about
his comments regarding the catalytic areas; Mr. Fish responded that it Is lhe market that will drive
improvement In these areas, not the City. The City can facilitate action and remove barriers lo improvement.
For strategy 2.1 and 2.2, Mr. Voboril asked for clarification on his comment regarding establishing
neighborhood character. Mr. Fish stated that he would like to have that strategy eliminated. Mr. Flaherty
informed the Commission that the consultants heard the comments from a neighborhood meeting and ri{'ed accordingly.
Mr. Brick thanked Mr. Flaherty for his comments regarding inlemal city services and expressed that he
agrees that it is important for the Comprehensive Plan lo be in alignment with the goals of City
administration and staff.
l81l
IV. PUBLIC FORUM
No members of the public were present al the meeting.
LEJI
V. ATTORNEY'S CHOICE
O~ty City Attorney Comer did not have any comments for the Commission,
lle!ll
VI. STAFF'S CHOICE
Mr. Flaherty slated that the Commission will have materials coming lo them soon regarding the sign code
regulations. He oullined the history and timeline of the developmenl of the new Comprehensive Plan He
asked the Commission to consider how much additional time they want to have for consideration of the
Comprehensive Plan In light of their regular workload. He reminded the Commissioners that they will have
a public hearing on November 17th and thal there will be additional comments received on the plan after
the hearing.
•
•
•
Mr. Bell informed the Commfsslon that the decision on case 2015-003 4635 South Pearl Street Urban Loi
Development is being appealed lo City Council on November 16, 2015 The letters received from the
three appellants w~I be forwarded to the Commissioners.
i~.
VII. COMMISSIONER'S CHOICE
Mr. Brick expressed that he has appreciation for the work that has gone into the Comprehensi ve Plan and
is willing lo continue working wi th staff.
Mr. Fish asked when the new City Council will be sworn In; Mr, Flaherty informed the Commission that
they will be sworn in at the regular meeting November 16111•
Mr. Kinion agreed with previous comments that the Commission has not spent enough I/me examining
the Comprehensive Plan .
The meeting adjourned at 8:50 pm.
/s/ Julie Bailey , Recordfng Secretary
5
•
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF CASE #ZON2015-003, )
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS )
AND RECOMMENDATIONS RELATING )
TO THE SAND CREEK PLANNED UNIT )
DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN )
)
)
INITIATED BY: )
SW Development Group, LLC )
161 6 1 7th Street, #362 )
Denver, CO 80202 )
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF THE
CITY PLANNING ANO
ZONING COMMISSION
Commission Members Present: Brick, Fish , Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth
Commission Members Absent: Bleile, Townley, Madrid
This matter was heard before the City Planning and Zoning Commission on November 31
2015 in the City Council Chambers of the Englewood Civic Center .
Testimony was received from staff. The Commission received nolice of Public Hearing,
the Staff Report, and a copy of the proposed Planned Unit Development (PUO) Site Plan
which were incorporated into and made a part of the record of the Public Hearing.
After considering the statements of the witness and reviewing the pertinent documents,
the members of the City Planning and Zoning Commission made the following Findings
and Conclusions.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THAT the Public Hearing on Case ZON2015-003 Sand Creek Planned Unit
Development Site Plan was brought before the Planning and Zoning Commission
on November 3, 2015.
2. THAT notice of the Public Hearing was published in the Englewood Herald on
October 15, 2015, and was on the City of Englewood website from October 22,
2015 to November 3, 2015.
3. THAT the staff report was made part of the record.
4. THAT the Sand Creek PUD District plan was approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission on November 20, 2012, and approved by City Council on February 4,
J
2013 with the condition that the final PUD Site Plan receive approval from the
Planning and Zoning Commi ssion and City Council.
5. THAT the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on September 24, 2015.
6. THAT the applicant is proposing approval of 70 units at the south-east corner of
the Sand Creek PUD.
7. THAT the final plans were reviewed by City of Englewood departments in August
2015, including Building, Engineering, Community Development and Fire and was
found to meet or exceed all requirements in the Sand Creek PUD District Plan.
8. THAT the PUD Site Plan sets forth the zoning regulations under which the
proposed development will occur.
CONCLUSIONS
1. THAT the proposed Sand Creek PUD Site Plan is in conformance with the District
Plan previously approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City
Council.
2. THAT the proposed development will be an improvement over the current use(s).
3. THAT the Sand Creek PUD Site Plan is consistent with adopted and generally
accepted standards of development in the City of Englewood.
4. THAT the Sand Creek PUD Site Plan is in conformance with the Englewood
Comprehensive Plan by providing a balanced mix of housing opportunities serving
the needs of current and fulure Englewood Citizens.
DECISION
THEREFORE, it is the decision of the City Planning and Zoning Commission that Case
#ZON2015-0-003 Sand Creek Planned Unit Development Site Plan should be referred to
the City Council with a favorable recommendation.
This decision was reached upon a vote on a motion made at the meeting of the City
Planning and Zoning Commission on November 3, 2015 by Knoth, seconded by King,
which motion states:
To c1pprove Case #ZON2015-003 Sand Creek Planned Unit Development
Site Plan and forward to City Council with a favorc1ble recommendation.
..
•
•
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
"
Brick, freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Fish
None
None
Bleile, Madrid, Townley
Motion carried.
These Findings and Conclusions are effective as of the meeting on November, 3, 2015.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
3