Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016 Resolution No. 038• • • RESOLUTION NO. _j ( SERIES OF 2016 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CITY'S ARAPAHOE COUNTY OPEN SPACE GRANT APPLICATION FOR PARK GATEWAY ENHANCEMENTS PHASE II. WHEREAS, the Parks Gateway Enhancements Project highlights a much overdue need to replace eight signs that are currently comprised of 50 year old hand made park identification signs with a more modern, updated design for park identification signage with additional landscaping surrounding the park signs; and WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation staff believe these park ID signs are the gateway into each of our neighborhood parks and are critical to identifying each of Englewood's parks and will improve the image of the City of Englewood; and WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended the Tacito Design for this project at the May 911\ 2002 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission again recommended the design at the October 11 11\ 2012, November 15 11\ 2012 and January 10 11\ 2013 meetings; and WHEREAS, the Englewood City Council approved the City's grant application to Arapahoe County Open Space for Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements Phase I, by the passage of Resolution No. 5, Series of 2015; which was awarded in 2015 and 17 identification signs in ten parks were replaced during Phase I; and WHEREAS, the passage of this Resolution authorizes the City's Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Application for Park Gateway Enhancements Phase II for the overdue replacement of 8 additional signs that are currently comprised of 50 year old hand made park identifications signs with a more modern, updated design for park identification signage with additional landscaping surrounding the park signs; and WHEREAS, there are no federal funds being used for the Park Gateway Enhancements Phase II project; and WHEREAS, the City's Arapahoe County Open Space grant application will request $90,900 in grant funds with a required City cash match of $30,300. Englewood shareback funds have been budgeted; and WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation will bring back an IGA if approved . 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes the application for an Arapahoe County Open Space Grant for Park Gateway Enhancements Phase II attached hereto as Exhibit A. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 1st day of Febru I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk for ~ty of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify the above is a true copy of Resolution No. _.:)_25_,. Series of 201 . 2 ... • • • • • • APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) 2016 Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Application for Standard and Small Grants Part A -Application Summary Form Applicant Information Name: City of Englewood Address: 1155 West Oxford Avenue, Englewood, CO 80110 Primary Contact: Dave Lee I Title: Open Space Manager Telephone: 303-762-2687 Email: dlee@englewoodgov.org Primary Partner Information (Additional partners should be discussed in Part F: Project Details, Question 13 of the application.) Name: Address: Contact: .. ,, ~~--"l~Tltle: Telephone: IF. ~ -::,,,_ . Email: If -~ -.:·:· ~ ,· Partner Responsibilities: , """.✓I l ., \ l~ I ,. f \,♦' • •n "ll ~' , . l 'R_'l9JectJnformation Grant Category: Standard Grant ·,· -..,,. . ;;,.,f .... : Project Type: Site Improvement Project Project Title: Englewood Parks Gat.e.wa_y_EnhancementsJe.basel0 _ Address: Northwest Greenbelt 2222 W. Vassar Ave., Southwest Greenbelt 4480 S. Huron St., Hosanna Athletic Complex 3700 S. Logan St., Barde Park 3116 S. Downing St., Clarkson Park 2800 S. Clarkson St., Depot Park 601 W. Dartmouth Ave., RiverRun Trailhead 2101 W. Oxford Ave., Clayton Athletic Field 4600 S. Fox St., Englewood, CO 80110 City or Unincorporated Arapahoe County: Englewood GPS Coordinates: Northwest Greenbelt -39°40'11.27"N 105°00'40.21"W, Southwest Greenbelt-39°38'07.82"N 104°59' 49.55"W, Hosanna Athletic Complex-39°38'57.79"N 104°58'58.71"W, Barde Park-39°39'33.85"N 104°58'24.35"W, Clarkson Park- 39°39'57.79"N 104°58'42.09"W, Depot Park-39°39'37.82"N 104°59'41.23"W, RiverRun Trailhead-39°38'32.59"N 105°00'52.l0"W, Clayton Athletic Field-39°37'56.40"N 104 °104 °59'36. 76"W Grant Request: $90,900 Cash Match Total: $30,300 Total Project Amount: $121,200 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page 1of20 I Percentage of Total Project: 25% E X H I B I T A • • • APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) Executive Summary project description, deliverables, components, need, goal, beneficiary, planning, community input, results The Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) demonstrate a much overdue need to replace 8 signs that are currently comprised of SO year old hand-made park identification signs with a more modern, updated design for park identification signage with additional landscaping surrounding the park signs. The community believes these park ID signs are the gateway into each of our neighborhood parks and are critical to identifying each of Englewood's parks. Replacement of the park ID signs will improve the image of the City of Englewood. This grant request is the second phase for replacement of the remainder of the current park identification signs in order to update the image of our city, which is a major goal for City Council. Signage design was brought about through a planning and selection process approved by the Englewood Parks & Recreation Commission and City Council. Phase II for this project will consist of replacing 8 park identification signs in smaller parks and greenbelts and providing for landscaping around the identification signs in 2016. Phase I of the Parks Gateway Enhancements JJ.roject was awarded an ACOS grant in June 2015. The Phase I grant award was $200;100 ana Will eplace 17 aged park signs. 'I .. ' t The start of Phase I signage has been tleta .ea du~ to ~he 'Pty recently embarking on a rebranding effort. The rebranding fgr'the City includes ch nges to the City's logo, word font and color scheme used for all officia · ify business.:rhe new rebranding changes will only , . benefit the Gateway Enhancements ro·ect a~ it, enhances our signage, making them more recognizable and modernizes our logo. '. 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page 2of 20 • • • APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) Part B -Minimum Qualification and Eligibility Form Certify the below minimum qualifications and eligibility criteria: Applicant Name: City of Englewood Application Category and Type: Standard Grant -Site Improvement Project Project Name: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) Briefly answer the following qualification questions: 1. Is applicant in good standing with Arapahoe County Open Space? Discuss past performance (past five years); discuss all on-going Arapahoe County Open Space Grants, and the number and types of grants for which your agency is applying in this cycle. The City of Englewood is in good standing with Arapahoe County Open Space. Over the past 5 years, Englewood has received 6 grants. All grants have been completed within the allotted time frame. The one exception is the RiverRun Trailhead grant, which expanded in project scope due to a rnajor-p_ro·ect sponsored by Urban Drainage and Flood Control and South Platte Worl<ln~~p up .':%he project encompasses an area from Union Avenue and the South ~.,ftejJ~rto:O~ot · -Avenue and the South Platte River. Englewood currently has thre{ o~~~i~g g-ran~s {Eng ewood Parks Gateway / { • ~ l Enhancements (Phase I) and RiverR · n Trail head (Pkase I & II). All three grants are in "t,.'f i ' .._, , .. progress. \ ·~" --., -~---::.:-r,,.,:· Englewood will apply for 2 standard grants this cycle. The grants are for Rotolo Park Playground Redevelop m ent lSite_JIDPJOveo,entj a .q d_ En_gJewood Parks Gateway Enhancements Phase II (Site Improvement). 2. Discuss project alignment with the Arapahoe County Open Space Master Plan; local adopted Master Plan; OR other approved planning documents. The Park Gateway Enhancements project compliments the mission of the Arapahoe County Open Space Plan . • Acquire, conserve and protect open space -The Park Gateway Enhancements project will continue to identify and protect Englewood Parks and open spaces. • Build county open space parks and trails -With updated and proper park gateway enhancements, Englewood Parks will attract new users and help maintain a healthy community. • Cooperative partnership work -This project allows the continued partnership between the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County Open Spaces and area groups such as Englewood Unleashed and Pirate Youth Sports to strengthen the Englewood Park System . 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page 3of20 \ ' • • • APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) • Leverage funding for open space, parks and trails -The Park Gateway Enhancements project will leverage funding sources from ACOS Grant Funds and Shareback Funds. 3. Describe how this project addresses specific objectives in the County Open Space Resolution #030381/#110637. Document is posted on the Open Space Grant Program page of the County Website. The Park Gateway Enhancements Project specifically addresses the following objectives of the County Open Space Resolution #030381/#110637. • Preserve urban and rural open space and natural areas -Proper identification and wayfinding improves the usage of parks and open spaces. This project will preserve the Englewood park system with designated park signage and encourage increased use through the attractive design to all residents of Arapahoe County. • Provide, maintain and improve neighborhood parks, open space, sports fields, picnic facilities and biking, walking and multi-use trails -The Park Gateway Enhancements project will improve the overall image of the park system. Gateway signage is rather like a first impression. Replacing outdateli$ig ~. with new designs will not only unify the identity of the entire park sysij~ig(llfyJ he cj r ty of our parks. Acknowledge the minimum qualificatib,i "l~fionen ~ liste~ below by checking each box. Ali components are required to meet mini ' q_i:qu~ffficattons: ✓ All items on the enclosed application checl<llst are included in the application ✓ All questions are answered in Part F and all supporting documents are attached in Part G ✓ All budget forms are affacneaand comprete ,.,,. ""...o"""" ✓ Application format and document order follow instructions ✓ Above eligibility and qualification questions are answered and meet Arapahoe County Open Space eligibility requirements ✓ Application is signed by agency's highest authority {or authorized individual) ✓ Minimum cash match requirement met {% of total project) Applicant certifies that all of the above items are included in the application and that all information submitted is true to the best of their knowledge. Authorized Signature:____________ Date: _______ _ (must be signed by highest authority in agency or authorized individual) PrintName&Title: Joe Jefferson, Mayor 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page4of20 APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) • Part B -Minimum Qualification and Eligibility Form (cont'd) • • For Arapahoe County Use Only: Initial Review Date (pre-qualification): _______________ _ • Minimum Qualifications Met (yes/no)? • Draft Submitted for Review (yes/no)? • Comments: Final Review Date (after evaluation and ra-nl<ing): ____________ _ • Comments/Conditions: Grant Program Administrator Signature: ______________ _ 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page Sof20 APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase Ill • Part C -Application Checklist • • Use the application checklist to verify that all of the required documents are included in this application in the order listed below. All sections are required and must be complete and signed (if applicable) to meet minimum qualifications. One original signed application and one copy must be included for all sections below. Part A through Part G of the Checklist must be included as one complete pdf document on a thumb drive and labeled with the Entity Name, Project Name, Application (ie. ArapahoeCounty.ParkPlan.Application). ✓ Part A -Application Summary Form ✓ Part B -Minimum Qualifications and Eligibility Form (signed} ✓ Part (-Application Checklist ✓ Part D -Project Timeline (must be detailed) ✓ Part E -Project Budget Narrative and Forms (all forms must be completely filled out) ✓ Part F -Project Details (narrative response to project questions; include Land Acquisition section if applicable) ✓ Part G -Attachments (Identify each attachment with a table of contents cover page, prepare attachments in the following_:cffaer'a . d label each attachment page at the top with the fisted attachment numbf'!.ga'g;Ji~f!i Prin one original and one copy to submit with Part G. This section does NOT;-neeif P,gge num ers.) 1. Evidence of support frh m ,b:ig • ~s . .autnority'(official letter or resolution)- including commitmen to cof' r;i t te a11_d aJ tain the project; statement that matching funds are se ,u~e'd . 7.(jlor fy .. nd-rf,i!ing efforts are underway; acknowledgment of respctn,iljifi y of COSl•0verruns; and certification that the project will be open to the'hubli£c9r se rC'e a public purpose upon completion. See attached sample resolution. 2. Evidence of community.support (letters-of-:support-maximum of 5) 3. Documentation of opposition and responses (state if applicable) 4. Evidence of commitment from project partners (cash match/in-kind match support letters/partner support letters -no maximum) 5. Photos (pre-submittal) 6. Maps (include site map & vicinity map) 7. Site Visit Form (plan and project site visit form with driving directions) 8. Evidence of commitment to long-term maintenance, including the maintenance budget and agency capacity to maintain (letter from management/maintenance agency) 9. Evidence of property ownership/legal access (legal documentation) 10. GIS shapefile, if applicable (include on thumb drive) 11. Other (clearly title: acquisition documentation: appraisal, title commitment, contract option (if applicable) or other supporting documents) 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page6of20 • • • APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) Part D-Project Timeline Use the below project timeline sample as a guide to complete your proposed project timeline. Project timeline must be detailed, realistic and coincide with Part F. Timeline should include the IGA execution and project start date (must be within 60 days of the award notification). Project timeline must conclude within 2 year requirement. Task Grant Notification IGASigned Solicitation of Vendors Project Bid Award{s) Upper Sign Manufacture Ground/Site Prep Concrete Base Installation Upper Sign Installation Landscaping Final Report Sep Oct Nov Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 2016 2016 2016 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page 7of20 APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) • Part E -Project Budget Narrative and Forms • • Budget Narrative: Provide a clear and concise budget narrative for this project (300 words or less). The Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) project will construct 8 park identification signs (8 small signs only) and include landscaping around each sign. Small sign fabrication is estimated to cost $6,404 per sign, concrete base installation is estimated at $6,902 per sign and sign installation in the field is estimated at $1,315 per sign. Landscaping surrounding the signs is estimated to cost $529 per sign. The landscaping will consist of various perennial plant species, which once established, will enhance the signage for many years to come. Plant material that does not survive the initial installation will be replaced using funds from the Parks Department maintenance budget. Budget Forms: All project budget forms must be completely filled out following the rules set forth in the application guidelines and instructions. The following project budget forms are attached and required to be complete and included in the application to meet minimum qualifications: • Summary Budget Form: The summ;,..cy :bJ.lQget form must be fully completed and successfully match up with the bjjdge'f:-=n~t r~tive,Jhe detailed budget form and the selection criteria questions. ,-,l ~ --· "\ -t • Detailed Expense Budget For "' r; The-,detiled expense budget form must be completed with sufficient detail to be acc J pt,ed. P.lease refere)'lce the sample budget for the ' ; ' " 1 'I expected level of detail. Budget ite_ ~r~lo be _ bfoken down into categories, and then broken down into the detailed use"'bf ~ndJ yt,ithin each category by line item and cost. The detailed expense budget form includes, grant funds, cash match (applicant and partner cash match) and in :'smJ!.m~t.~h : Only ca_s_b maJsh counts toward the percentage of match required. The minimum cash match requirement is 25% of the total project cost for Standard Grants and 10% of the total project cost for Small Grants. In-kind match is significant and shows partnership and community support for the project. Administrative costs to prepare the grant application are not an eligible expense . (Review the Grant Application Instructions for eligibility details.) 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page8of 20 • Arapahoe County Open Space Applicant Cash Match (Speclfy)Partner Cash Match/Other Funding Source (Speclfy)Partner Cash Match/Other Funding Source Date Secured 6/6/2016 12/15/2015 Applicant: City of Englewood Requirements: Total Project Amount: In-kind Match: Tata/ Project w/out In-kind: Cash Match Percentage Requl~ ' Required Cash Match Amount: Project Cash Match Summa.get Form County Grant Re uest $90,900 Cash Match $30,300 Project Title: Englewood Parks Gat $121,200.00 $0.00 $121,200.00 25.00% $30,300.00 In-Kind Match Year: $30,300.00 Minimum Met: Y or N Total Project Funds $90,900 $30,300 $0 $0 2016 • • • • DETAILED EXPENSE WORKSHEET NUMBER Category Description Une Item Detlal ACOS Grantee Partner All TOTAL Code (Or In-Kind Description) Description Grant Cash Match Cash Match In-kind Match Park ID Small Sign (8 signs) ,~-- S18'! fabrication ~ $20,932.00 $30,300.00 $51,232.00 Concrete sign base $55,216.00 $55,216.00 Sign installation $10,520.00 $10,520.00 Landscape installation $4,232.00 $4,232.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ACTUAL TOTALS $0.00 $90,900.00 $30,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $121,200.00 Appllcant: ~llll Qf ~DBl!:!ri!QQ~ Project tltle:Enslewood Parks Gatewalf Enhancements Phase II Date:December 15, 2015 APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) • Part F -Project Details • • Applicants must limit this section to 10 pages and answer all questions to meet minimum qualifications. If attachments/supporting documentation apply, please fully answer the question and reference the document in Part G. Please do not answer a question as "N/A". If a question is not applicable, please explain why it is not applicable. Select the Grant Category: X Standard Grant: $50,100 -$400,000 funding opportunity, 25% of total project amount minimum cash match requirement □ Small Grant: $100 -$50,000 funding opportunity, 10% of total project amount minimum cash match requirement Select the Project Type: Project Type/Project Details: The project categories for the small and standard grant applications are below: □ Trail Project: Projects that are mostlyJ_ra ilconstruction or renovation/restoration, trail - related bridges, trail-related r · ii head parking and shelters. X Site Improvement Projects: · vement, restoration and repair/replacement includin restoration, park improvements, restoration, repair/replacem unds, shelters, sport fields, landscaping). This category segments or connections, but the majority of the project shoul s other than trail. □ Construction Project: Construction projects may include new park amenities such as playgrounds, shelters, sport fields, restrooms, and interior trails or connections. □ Acquisition Project: Eli ible ro ·ects involve fe_e .simAte acgl,lisition of land for public open space, park or trails; acquisition of buffer land; acquisition of a conservation easement and/or acquisition of water rights. □ Environmental Project/Cultural Education or Interpretation Project: Projects focused on environmental or cultural education/interpretation installations may include associated sign bases, panels, landscaping, benches and shelters. □ Other Project: Other allowable project categories include: stream-related projects, wildlife habitat, and water quality. These projects should not fit into any of the other project categories. Please contact the County Grants Program Administrator for questions related to allowable projects . 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page9of20 • • • APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase Ill Selection Criteria Questions: 1. Describe the project goal, extent of scope and expected results. Be specific; discuss what the project will provide, quantities, size, project elements, useful life of project components, and deliverables. Discuss the current condition of the project site and what improvements or changes are being proposed and why. Provide detailed maps, plans and photos in Part G. Describe how the project will be designed, constructed, and managed. Describe how this project improves access and connectivity to any existing trail network, natural resources, and/or community resources. If this is an educational project, discuss the long-term educational outcomes expected as a result of this project and how the project connects people to each other, the natural environment and/or community resources. Complete the budget forms in Part E consistent with this narrative. Gateway enhancements include replacement of 50 year old hand-made park identification signs with updated, modern design park identification signage with additional landscaping surrounding the ark signs. The community believes these park ID signs are the gateway into eac ,o 'Our n igh orhood parks and are critical to identifying each of Englewood' -·parks .. epla~ement of the park ID signs will improve the image of the City of Englewoocl.,THe ,g9al is, to r,eplace all current park ID signs in two phases and update the image ~f -our>fatx, whicti ls a ajor goal for City Council. This is the second phase for replacernen , o the current P.ark identification signs . Phase I was awarded grant funding in 2015 h d ,curr~ntly is int e bidding phase of the project. Phase I will provide signage for ten major park $ites in Englewood including: Belleview, Baker, Centennial, Emerson, Bates-Logan, Romans, Cushing, Miller, Jason and Rotolo Parks. Phase II will include the following small park areas : Northwest Greenbelt, Southwest Greenbelt, Hosanna ATo fetic Complex: Barde~Park, Clarkson Park, Depot Park, RiverRun Trailhead and Clayton Athletic Field. The Phase II scope for the project is to replace 8 park ID signs at 8 different parks. This project also includes landscape enhancements surrounding each identification sign. In Phase II, only the small park identification signs will be constructed. The large sign dimensions are approximately 9 feet long by 6 ½ feet tall and were used in Phase I of this project. The small signs are approximately 6 feet long by 4 ½ feet tall and will be utilized at each of the Phase II park locations. Each sign is non-illuminated, aluminum construction on a cast concrete base with a 6 inch mow strip around the base. The paint for the aluminum is acrylic polyurethane graffiti resistant in dark green PMS #370, light green #PMS376, Matthews "warm white" and Matthews "brushed aluminum" colors. Life expectancy for the project is estimated to be 20 years. The Gateway Enhancement project will be advertised for competitive sealed bid. Bid specifications will be developed and advertised on Rocky Mountain Bid Net. A vendor 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page 10of20 • • • APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II} will be selected based on the price of their bid and experience constructing such a project. The Gateway Enhancement project will update and improve the overall image of Englewood Parks & Recreation and the City of Englewood. The project will also improve access and connectivity by more clearly and prominently identifying Englewood parks to automotive, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. 2. Describe the community/neighborhood and user groups the project will serve. Discuss the type of users (children, adults, seniors, families, sports leagues, youth groups, etc.) the project will serve and estimate the number of user groups annually that will benefit from the project. Be specific. How did you arrive at this estimate? Describe the service area for this project (how far will users travel to use the project site). The Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements will serve the Englewood community, the surrounding neighborhoods and all park users from outside of Englewood. Englewood parks are visited by many families, adJ!l~.r.,seniors, dog walkers, youth and adult sports leagues. The gateway enhancem ~p swi I proviq t Englewood with a new branding image for our parks and clearer, mor '6bvious idenUfica ·.on for our parks. A recent citizen A~ survey from the 2014 Commuhj ty Liyabili · .. ReQOrt ' nglewood, CO stated that 88% of Englewood's 31,676 citizens : ~ ojp p~rff Engl~w9od parks are locally renowned and receive many visitors from arou,n~I th"e ,metro-area , -,,,Ii·,. I 3. Describe the planning process t ~t]de~tified ttiis ~pecific project as a priority. Is this project listed as a priority in a master p an, site specific plan or other adopted planning document? If so, discuss that plan. Describe the relationship of the project to any local, -~~~~oililMWi ·51777Fffl;f"C, ·..,., regional, state or system-wide master plan. Give the name of each plan and list related element(s) within the plan. Was this project identified through an independent community planning process? Describe this process. Is this project a working group project? If so, was it prioritized? Is this project a part of a larger project or phased project? If yes, explain the whole project, other funding sources and partners involved. This project was identified through an independent community planning process by the City's Community Development Department. During the planning process that started in 1999 through 2002 , the City was desirous of a signage plan that would blend the various signage needs (Civic Center, Entry Port, District and Park Identification) throughout the City in one uniform design theme. Unfortunately, the project was put on hold due to a lack of funding resources. Recently, the economy has begun to improve and Duncan Park was redeveloped with help from a grant from Arapahoe County Open Spaces and the use of Shareback funds. New park identification signage was constructed in Duncan Park that has now raised the 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page 11 of20 • • • APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase Ill priority of making all park identification signage uniform by replacing all of the existing 50 year old park signs. This grant request is not a typical site improvement project which would be included in a long range planning document. This project has been an issue for over twenty years as our current park identification signage has become very outdated. Due to more pressing City of Englewood commitments and priorities as well as the economy, this project has not been funded but has been thoroughly reviewed and would be a welcomed project by the residents of Englewood and Arapahoe County. Even though this project is not listed in a specific planning document, parks gateway enhancements are fundamental to park usage. This enhancement project creates a community identity with the park system, welcomes new users and establishes the level of care and maintenance that is provided in our parks. This gateway sign project has been a phased project with Phase I kicking off in January 2016 through the start of the competitive.bid process. The City's desire for an updated logo and City-wide branding pro~e~e :the-eark gateway signage enhancements slightly until the new logo and r'~~:~_proj:~~ we.re completed. 4. Discuss the need and urgenc l 9r thrs'pr:oJect and w,hy it is a priority. What opportunities will be lost if this project is no(f ~d , d ·'1:-":'_?-,,'· 'l ' ~ .;,/ The need and urgency for this project' is grea_t.mie project was started 16 years ago and ~,,,. has stalled several times due to the economy and lack of sufficient budget funding in recent years. The City is curr~nliY.£JJJ.~t~ing on_a..._n .. ~~ ~o..f identifying who we are and what services we provide to our citizens through the development of a new mission and vision statement: To promote and ensure a high quality of life, economic vitality and a uniquely desirable community identity by proactively collaborating with our citizens and businesses, developing a safe environment, creating opportunity and through the provision of reliable, affordable and flexible services. City Council has given approval for the parks gateway enhancements as an initial step towards this new mission, vision and logo for the City of Englewood. The need and urgency for this project has been heightened as the first step in identifying and rebranding the City with its new logo. The City is currently in the process of updating our parks and recreation master plan after using our current Master Plan for the last ten years. If the second phase of this project is not funded, it will likely have to compete with other capital project needs arising from the newly updated Master Plan. 5. Summarize any investments made prior to submitting a grant proposal. Discuss pre- submittal meetings, dates and outcomes. Be detailed and include eligible pre-planning costs on the match section of the Detailed Expense Budget Form in Part E. {See 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page 12of20 • • APPLICANT : City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) application instructions for details. Proof of pre-submittal planning expenses must be submitted as an attachment in Part G. All attachments should be clearly labeled on the Table of Contents and on the Part G cover page.) Planning for the park gateway signage initially started in 1999. The City of Englewood was interested in strengthening the community image and heightening awareness of Englewood. Tacito Design Inc. was selected for design development of entry port monumentation, City district sign age design and park gateway signage enhancements. An advisory committee was formed to help guide the process and to communicate with their constituencies in the community. The advisory committee was comprised of policy- makers, local merchants, residents and City staff. In early 2002, four park signage design concepts were developed at a cost of $15,500 (see Part G) and in May 2002, Tacito Design met with the Englewood Parks & Recreation Commission and selected a park signage design concept. In the following years, the economy began to contract and EngleV{_QOQ went through a number of years of budget freezes and reductions. The proj,~<;_!_ vI:.s_}:~_f o n~old due to a lack of funding resources. '/ ___ :.,-~-,_-', . In 2013, the City was awarded a $:fS Q1>00g~~o t frQm Arapahoe County for the redevelopment of Duncan Pa r~:-Asfii ~f'that proj &ct, the new park gateway sign age enhancements were incorpor~tec(in c,>l t ,e red~vel,i;>.j:>ment of Duncan Park. Due to the success of this park redevelop (i:1ep l1r1't -tfe·fall--6f 2614 and the input received from citizens and policy-makers, the c,iiio'u lcflike;t o'rnove forward with updating and enhancing all park gateway signage. '" ---- As part of the Gateway ""Ennancements p'ro}ect, oritfohs"°for landscape designs were drawn up by PKM Design Group at an expense of $1,100. (see Part G). In June 2015 , Englewood embarked on a process of rebranding the City. Many residents and businesses were looking for an updated community identity, one that focuses on Englewood's strengths and promotes a higher quality of life. Within the branding platform is the position of a community of accessible and high quality parks with the promise of investing in safety, arts, parks and recreation to create a high quality of life. A successful brand can help attract new businesses, new residents and help all community members feel connected to and proud of their community. As part of this process, Englewood developed a new logo in 2015 . Englewood Parks and Recreation will be the first department to roll out the new branding and logo through the construction of the new park identification signs during both Phase I and Phase II of this project. 6. Describe how this project will be completed within the two year grant timeframe. • Project timeline must begin within 60 days of the award notification. Is design and 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page 13 of 20 • • • APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) 6. Describe how this project will be completed within the two year grant timeframe. Project time line must begin within 60 days of the award notification. Is design and engineering complete or is there still work to be done? List any permits that will need to be obtained for implementation of the project and existing status of obtaining those permits. (Federal 404, County or City Planning or Public Works, Storm Water Drainage, etc). If permits are needed now or in future phases, explain the process. Does the project necessitate a change in zoning? Itemize anticipated costs for permits, government fees and consultants. Detail costs in the correct Part E Budget Form. Correlate response with the Project Timeline in Part D. If your project is an acquisition, complete the Land Acquisition Narrative Section at the end of Section F. Include detailed costs in Part E. The Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) project is "shovel ready" if selected as a grant award. Design and engineering has been completed. Landscaping designs have also been completed. Two park ID signs have already been constructed as part of a previous ACOS grant award during the redevelopment of Duncan Park. After reviewing the project with the City Planning and Public Works Departments, there are no permits, ~~ government fees or zoning chang~s re_qu_ired. -._ f ,~-~"~i, ...... ~ ,# ✓,.:Y ' It is anticipated that Phase I (aWaraed '~ "AC6S gra, tin 2015) will start construction in early spring 2016. The later t ananticipa,t~d start to this project is due to the City rebranding efforts and chang~s :to1 n·e City logo. .·, 't"-' ' ; / ,, J' 7. Discuss any efforts to obtain pu J t~{iop~~, a;ss~minate public information, develop partnerships, develop partnerships for cash 'finding or in-kind contributions, and garner community support specifically related to this project. Evidence of a transparent public process will be requirea.D1 scuss an y oofectfons"'oroppositlon to this project and what was done to address concerns. Include any letters, petitions, news articles, or other documents evidencing opposition. Planning for the park gateway signage initially started in 1999. The City of Englewood was interested in strengthening the community image and heightening awareness of Englewood. Tacito Design Inc. was selected for design development of entry port monumentation, district signage design and park gateway signage enhancements. An advisory committee was formed in 1999 to help guide the process and to communicate with their constituencies in the community. The advisory committee was comprised of policy-makers, local merchants, residents and City staff. In 2002, the Englewood Parks & Recreation Commission selected a park signage design concept. The Commission is an advisory board made up of Englewood citizens who guide public policy for the Parks and Recreation Department and make recommendations as public input to Englewood City Council. 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page 14of20 • • • APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) During Parks and Recreation Commission meetings held between October 2012 and January 2013, parks signage was again reviewed and approved in order to have new signage in place for the Duncan Park Redevelopment grant (meeting minutes are attached (Part G -11. Other). Duncan Park redevelopment provided the City an opportunity to update its first park identification sign and has received a great deal of attention from citizens throughout Englewood. Many have requested that their old wooden parks identification signs be replaced with new signage reflecting the recent rebranding efforts and new logo. All Parks and Recreation Commission meetings are open to the public and their comments and input are invaluable in addressing any public concerns. We have received no objections or opposition toward this proposed project. 8. How much of your planned cash match is secured? How much still needs to be raised and what are your plans for raising ad . itioogil_ funds? What is your back up plan if you -"' ~,"' are unable to raise those fun ? · ··rstand that all overruns are the responsibility of the applican r cash and in-kind partnerships established for this project. l rtners who have contributed to previous phases or partners t ri u . o future phases. Explain if partnerships were not possib or thi's project. Include all partner support letters in Part G. Include mat er:s:~n the Part E Budget. All support letters must be dated within t · . .. _ ;hs to be eligible. ,-..... _ . The entire cash match !.~£\:!!.~,~e ~.re plil,!l nin~,11n_usjn.g Arapahoe County Shareback Funds. There are no other cash or in-kind partnerships with this project. Partnerships were not possible for the gateway enhancements in the eight park locations at this time. 9. Briefly discuss support from entities and user groups that are supporting the project in other ways than cash or in-kind contributions. Support letters should come from users, working groups, user groups, community members, volunteers, schools, etc. A maximum of five (S) community support letters should be attached in Part G. All letters should be dated within the last six months. Englewood has broad based support for the Parks Gateway Enhancements project. Denver Urban Gardens is a non-profit organization that operates over 145 community gardens throughout the Metro Denver area. Their mission is to grow community gardens one at a time. DUG is in support of our efforts to improve and increase the visibility of Englewood parks . 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page 15of20 • • • APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) Englewood Schools serves our community's academic and athletic needs for youth. The City and School District partner on shared use of numerous sports fields and tennis courts. Two of these shared fields that need identification signage are Hosanna Athletic Complex and Clayton Field . Englewood Schools has granted approval for the park identification signs on school property (see Englewood School District letter in Attachment G-Property Ownership). Kells Waggoner is a community member and citizen advocate for our parks. He resides adjacent to Romans Park and is a huge supporter of our parks and recreation programs. Kells also volunteers his time to maintain annual flower beds in our parks. Marty Repice is a long -time Englewood citizen and is a member of our community garden steering committee. Marty has noted that the current park identification signs are dated and worn looking. He has expressed enthusiasm with regard to the updated identification signs . 10. Describe any scenic, historic or cultural. values associated with this project. Will they be ---~~~~ preserved or restored? Describe specific natural resources at the site, including habitat and/or water. List predominar)t'~fdlife sp ecfes·an,d vegetation on site. Discuss impacts to these resources as a result 9f thisptoj¢ct."ll lf. thi~ is a conservation easement acquisition project, describe ~~sE!rv?Jtion ' v~lue and public benefits/value of the ~ ~ : land, easement or water reso '. r'eae / ., '1 ' 1 , l • \ li,,' '1 ;. •-:- ( I -.'' There are no scenic, historic or c I ucal values,,.,c3~ssociated with the Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements. The eight pl rklocations are comprised of typical suburban park natural resources, habitat and water. The parks are all irrigated and contain the typical bluegrass turf ananafiveo/non-native=t reesp ecies cottonwood, oak, ash, linden, spruce, Austrian and Ponderosa pine species) found along the Front Range. Northwest Greenbelt and Hosanna Athletic Complex have small streams and RiverRun Trailhead has the Platte River running through the property. The habitat value of these parks would be categorized as low. Typical bird species include sparrows, robins, finch, geese, etc. Animal species include fox, coyote, skunk, rabbit, etc. Impacts to the natural resources are considered to be extremely low. 11 . Discuss the ownership and legal access to the proposed project site, including right of access without trespassing on adjacent property. Detail any third-party rights, easements or other encumbrances that exist. Provide supporting documentation proving ownership, legal access or permission from landowner and a site map in Part G. The listed parcels of property: Northwest Greenbelt 2222 W. Vassar Ave., Southwest Greenbelt 4480 S. Huron St., Barde Park 3116 S. Downing St., Clarkson Park 2800 S. Clarkson St., Depot Park 601 W. Dartmouth Ave., RiverRun Trailhead 2101 W. Oxford Ave., are located in Englewood, Colorado. The City of Englewood is the sole owner of 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page 16of 20 • • • APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) these parcels. Vehicle access to the locations will be provided by current public streets. No third party rights, easements or other encumbrances will affect this project. The City of Englewood owns all park property and is managed by the Parks and Recreation Department. Hosanna Athletic Complex 3700 S. Logan St. and Clayton Athletic Field 4600 S. Fox St. are owned by Englewood School District while being operated and maintained by the City of Englewood through a joint use agreement (see Englewood School District letter in Attachment G-Property Ownership). Arapahoe county parcel search ownership verification is located in Part G. 12. Describe long-term maintenance of the project site and components. Estimate the annual costs to maintain the site, how those numbers were calculated, how you intend to fund maintenance and who is responsible for maintenance. Explain how maintaining this project site changes your agency's maintenance budget. (Provide projected budget changes, detailed cost estimates, how Y.9 1!..Plan to accommodate these changes, and explain how you arrived at those oun.f~:) P't vide a commitment letter from the management/maintenance age ~y~add_ressing long-term maintenance and include budgeting for funding maintenance}q',~ _:G--:..-\, ~1; .r -?:.,/' -i-'C _(II-,, •- The Englewood Parks and Rec 'aStb , £El _,artment 1,,-ill be responsible for the long-term maintenance of every park, all tand:ftape enhan s-~ents and signage for the project. This includes the two signs (Hosann.a'.and 'SaY19 n) located on Englewood School property. The City of Englewood annuartya11o·cates funding in the Parks and Recreation Department budget for personnel, commodities and capital for regular repair and maintenance for all paff< m rastrucrures,-ame nitres ancflac,lities. The 2016 Parks Division Maintenance Budget is $2,154,802. The Parks Department currently maintains approximately 250 acres of parkland, open space and green space and the parks gateway enhancements are not estimated to increase the overall maintenance budget for many years due to the low maintenance cost materials used in the project (concrete and powder coated aluminum). Landscape designs using perennial plants were added with the goal of keeping maintenance costs low. The maintenance of the perennial landscaping will also be absorbed into the existing parks budget for 2016 and outlying years, as these areas will not result in a significant increase in area or plant material to manage. 13. Describe how this project addresses inclusivity per the Americans with Disabilities Act guidelines. Parks Gateway Enhancements is an atypical project that does not fall into the guidelines of ADA. The project is a gateway enhancement that allows all individuals to identify specific Englewood parks and to enjoy all the amenities each park has to offer . 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page 17of20 • • • APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) 14. If successful in obtaining this grant, how will the agency use this project to inform citizens about the value of the Arapahoe County Open Space sales and use tax? Address the public outreach plan, signage plan, celebration, dedication, etc. Please write a brief press release statement. Explain how the County will be recognized and informed that materials, articles and ceremonies have/are taking place. This information is required to include County acknowledgement and should be relayed to the County Grants Program Administrator for review and filing. The Parks Gateway Enhancement Project Phase II is about creating an identity. As recognition of the grant funding and support, permanent signage identifying ACOS has been incorporated into the design of all 8 signs and will be installed as part of gateway enhancements at all park locations. Approved sign designs are attached in Part G -10. Information will also be added to the City of Englewood's web site identifying the project and funding sources during and following construction. The Englewood Herald will run information and a news stori~ughout the project. Social media such as Facebook and Twitter will be useg;fo-p o vr e project updates, recognize accomplishments and promote(6ur AEQ~ f uriding partnership. 'i -:-,, k • , /i ' .· ' I) ' • • " J I • ' La d A . . . Q ,·t· . Q I , ~/l n cqu1s1t1on ua 1 ,cation uest 11~ .l . · Complete this section ONLY if your prolect Is a Lana 'Acquisition. Applicants are allowed an additional 3 page ~to ans '%ed he questions for this section. All applications must include a copy of the Title <::ornmitment and Appraisal for all parcels included in the application (attached in Part G). Contact the title company early in the process since it -.-..::111'~~~ .Oltt~-U. ;s:w--- may take some time to get the commitment. Please contact the County Grants Program Administrator if you have any questions or concerns. The following questions cover aspects of the acquisition that ACOS needs information about in order to assess whether ACOS should be involved. Please answer each question to the best of your knowledge. If you don't know an answer, please contact ACOS staff to determine the best way to respond to the question . 1. Transaction Details a. Describe the property as it is now, including the number of acres, key features, zoning and current uses. Discuss the planned uses of the property, including a discussion of the envisioned amenities. What makes this property ideal for the proposed amenities? Do current or proposed uses of neighboring properties negatively impact the property's recreational development? b. Discuss connectivity to local and regional parks and trail systems? Is this acquisition a critical connection point? If so, please explain. c. Describe the structure of the transaction. What is the status of the acquisition or negotiations with the landowner? Are there provisions in the purchase/option contract 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page18of20 • • • APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II} that are still under negotiation? If so, what? When do you anticipate closing on the property? d . What is the appraised or estimated full fair market value of the property? If no appraisal has been done but a purchase price has been determined, how did you arrive at your estimate of value (for example, did a local realtor or appraiser make an educated guess)? 2. Encumbrances a. Disclose any known encumbrances on the property. For example, include information on mortgages, utility easements, agricultural or other leases, or liens. b. Are there any access easements on the property? If so, where are they located and to which neighboring properties do they provide access? c. Are there any existing or potential boundary disputes with neighbors? Please mark the location of any easements or boundary disputes on a site map and include it clearly labeled in Part G "Other Attachments". 3. Environmental Hazards .I ---_""" _ ;...._ ~~ --~ ::£,"'!: .. .',..' a. D~scribe all known historic usf§ ~f tl1c J>,ri p'erty anti. any hazardous conditions that may exist. , ~,.' ) b. Has a hazardous materials asse~smeht 1been perfonti ed? If so, what were the results? What actions were recommend 4d,ll"t ~nd ~~t remedial activities have occurred? 4. Mineral Rights a. Have any mineral rights1Je"efi severe-cl frorrrth'e sl.frface· fee title to the property, including sand and gravel, oil and gas, and other mineral rights? If so, describe the severed rights and identify who currently owns the rights, if current ownership is known. If no, then skip the next two questions. i. Will these rights be acquired or otherwise controlled or restricted when fee title is acquired? ii. Has a professional geologist issued a mineral statement about the possibility of extracting minerals, and if so, what were the results of that opinion? b. Are there any active mining permits or leases on the property? c. Is there mineral development currently occurring on the property? If so, what kind? Please designate on a map the location of the development and identify which map it is. 5. Experience a. Describe the applicant's experience with, and/or any consultations you have had with outside experts, other communities, or knowledgeable individuals about completing an acquisition like this. Who, if anyone, will be assisting with this transaction and how? 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page 19of20 APPLICANT: City of Englewood PROJECT TITLE: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase II) • Part G -Attachments • • Use the application checklist to verify that all of the required documents are included in this application in the order listed below. All sections are required and must be complete to meet minimum qualifications. One original signed application and one copy must be included for all sections below. Part A through Part G must be included as one complete pdf document on a thumb drive and labeled with the Entity Name, Project Name, Application (ie. ArapahoeCounty.ParkPlan.Application). ✓ Part A -Application Summary Form ✓ Part B -Minimum Qualifications and Eligibility Form ✓ Part C -Application Checklist ✓ Part D -Project Timeline (must be detailed) ✓ Part E -Project Budget Narrative and Forms (all forms must be completely filled out) ✓ Part F -Project Details (narrative response to project questions; include land Acquisition section if applicable) ✓ Part G -Attachments {Identify each attachment with a table of contents cover page, prepare attachments in the following order. a d label each attachment page at the top with the listed attachment numbe( ana titlt!b Print one original and one copy to submit with Part G. This section does NOT-nee8' 9ge numbers.) 1. Evidence of support fro .hig ~st ~uthority (:official letter or resolution)- including commitment o co pl te and maintain the project; statement that matching funds are sec:U red ana or fund-raising efforts are underway; acknowledgment of respo _ Jibility of cost-overruns; and certification that the project will be open to the pu li~or serve a public purpose upon completion. See attached sample resolution. 2. Evidence of community-Support (letters of support-maximum of 5} 3. Documentation of opposition and responses (state if applicable) 4. Evidence of commitment from project partners (cash match/in-kind match support letters/partner support letters -no maximum) 5. Photos (pre-submittal} 6. Maps {Include site map & vicinity map) 7. Site Visit Form (plan and project site visit form with driving directions) 8. Evidence of commitment to long-term maintenance, including the maintenance budget and agency capacity to maintain (letter from management/maintenance agency) 9. Evidence of property ownership/legal access (legal documentation) 10. GIS shapefile, if applicable (include on thumb drive) 11. Other (clearly title: acquisition documentation: appraisal, title commitment, contract option (if applicable) or other supporting documents) **Resolution from a Governing Body or an Official Letter from Highest Authority must include all listed applicable items and must designate a specific person to sign the grant agreement and related grant administration documents.•• 2016 Standard and Small Grant Application Page 20of20 • Part G 1. Evidence of support from highest authority • • • Part G 2. Evidence of community support • • • • Englewood Schools A Rele ntless focus On Leaming December 9 , 2015 County Open Space Grant Program 6934 S . Lima St, Unit A Centennia l, CO 80112 Dear Board Members, CORY HAWK Assistant PrincipoJ/Afhlelic Director Englewood High School 3800 South Logan Slreel Eng lewood, Colorado 80113 Phone: 303-806-2253 Fo x: 303-806·2296 On behalf of Englewood Schools, I would like to offer my support for the City Englewood Department of Parks and Recreation 's application for an Arapahoe County Open Space Grant for Gateway Enhancements . Gateway enhancements in the parks will improve the overall image of Englewood . Our athletic program utilizes many of the parks in Englewood for p ractices and games. New signs will help t o identify the parks to vis itors and to i ts citizens while con veying the message that Englewood has pride in and takes values in its parks. The current gateway signs are old and outdated. New signs will also reflect and display the changes that are taking place with in the City of Englewood . We support the City's grant appli cation for Gateway Enhancements in Englewood Pa rks. ::::< .. Cory Hawk Assistant Principal/Athl etic Director E n glewood Schools Wendy Rubin, Ed.D. • Superintendent of Schools Roscoe L Davidson Administrolion Building • 4101 Soulh Bannock Street • Englewood, Colorado 80110 • Phone:303-761-7050 • • m Elli f lffi DENVER URBAN GARDENS ~~ ~ . o-ne,, ~ ~ et-t" C(/~ December 7, 2015 Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Program 6934 S. Lima St, Unit A Centennial, CO 80112 Dear Board Members, On behalf of Denver Urban Gardens, I would like to offer my support for an Arapahoe County Open Space Grant that would complete the project of Gateway Enhancements within the City of Englewood's Parks . New gateway signs in Englewood parks will enhance the overall image of the City of Englewood and its parks system. The enhancement of signage in the parks will reflect the pride and dedication the Department of Parks and Recreation has for its parks, and the citizens and visitors who use these parks. The enhancement of the signs in Englewood parks will expand access and connectivity to the parks within the community. New parks signs will also help identify the parks to visitors. Denver Urban Gardens supports the City of Englewood, Department of Parks and Recreation's application for grant funds for Gateway Enhancements. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 303-292-9900 x106 or Rebecca@dug.org. Sincerely, Rebecca Andruszka Director of Development & Communications Denver Urban Gardens Denver Urban Gardens 11031 33rd Street Suite 100 I Denver, Colorado 80205 303.292.9900 I dirt@dug.org I www.dug.org • • • December 4, 2015 Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Program 6934 S. Uma St, Unit A Centennial, CO 80112 Advisory Board Members, I am writing this letter of support for the Englewood Department of Parks and Recreation's appllcatlon for grant funds for Gateway Enhancements. As a citizen of Englewood, I am certain that the Gateway Enhancements In Englewood Parks wlll lmprove the overall Image and perception of City of Englewood. The new park slgnage will help Identify the parks to visitors and to resldents alike. These new gateway enhancements will reflect the ongoing Improvements taking place within the City and will Include the City of Englewood's new logo. These upgrades to the parks will confirm to the public that City of Englewood and Its Parks and Recreation Department values their parks and takes pride in their community • Thank you for your consideration for this application. Sincerely, ,:( :,,~ Kells Waggoner Otizen City of Englewood • • December 4, 2015 Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Program 6934 S. Lima St, Unit A Centennial, CO 80112 Dear Board Members, I am writing this letter in support of the Englewood Department of Parks and Recreation's application for grant funds for Gateway Enhancements. As a citizen of Englewood and a volunteer at the Depot Garden here in Englewood, I believe that the Gateway Enhancements within the parks system would improve the overall image of our city. The current signs in Englewood's parks are dated and worn . New signs in the park that will incorporate the new City logo will show the community and visitors that Englewood is a vital and modern city. The City of Englewood Parks and Recreation Department has always taken pride in its parks and open spaces. New gateway enhancements will convey this pride to everyone who visits an Englewood park . I support the City of Englewood, Department of Parks and Recreation's application for Gateway Enhancements . Marty Repice Citizen City of Englewood • Part G 3. Documentation of opposition and responses • • • Part G 4. Evidence of commitment from project partners • • • No funding partner commitment to include • • • • • Part G s. Photos Current signage at Northwest Greenbelt • Current signage at Southwest Greenbelt • -~ Current signage at Hosanna Athletic Complex • Current signage at Barde Park • • Current signage at Clarkson Park • Future site of Depot signage • • Future site of RiverRun Trailhead signage • Current signage at Clayton Athletic Field • • • Part G 6. Maps City of Englewood, Colorado 2016 Arapahoe County Open Space, Parks, and Trails Grant Application Englewood Parks Signage Modernization SW Greenbelt, NW Greenbelt, Clarkson-Amherst Park, Depot Park, and Clayton Field 0 Site Plan Map: 1 of 2 LEGEND 0 Sign Locations 1:1 Boundary Lines December 2015 8 200 400 Feet 600 City of Englewood, Colorado 2016 Arapahoe County Open Space, Parks, and Trails Grant Application 0 Englewood Parks Signage Modernization Hosanna Athletic Field Complex, Barde Park, and RiverRun Trailhead Site Plan Map: 2 of 2 LEGEND O Sign Locations a Boundary Lines December 2015 200 400 Feet 600 -t--------t~-----i-------r E)- CHERRY HILLS ~-+--t-i!--------- LITT[ETON HIGHLANDS RANCH V IL l!A GE BEU.EVIEW VE ~ GREENWOOD I VILLAGE L-.--~~==~+---\---t----1=......,_,f---)7 City of Englewood/ Colorado 2016 Arapahoe County Open Space, Parks, and Trails Grant Application 0 Englewood Parks Signage Modernization Vicinity Map December 2015 1 2 Miles 3 • Part G 7. Site visit form • • • • • 2016 ACOS Grant Applicant Site Visit Form City of Englewood Standard Grant -Site Improvement Project Name of Applicant Grant Category and Type Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements Phase II Title of Grant Dave Lee dlee@englewoodgov.org 720-884-7808 Primary Contact Name Contact Email and Cell Phone Required for Site Visits: 1. Please provide the project address or the closest major intersection. 2. Please provide Point-To-Point Driving Directions from ACOS offices to project location. If you are providing an Intersection, please provide Turn-By-Turn directions from ACOS to the intersection and then from the intersection to the project site (recommended site visit location). 3. Please attach driving directions to this form (behind). Yahoo driving directions are preferred • 4. Propose a meeting location at the project site. 5. Other important information. (Example: parking, clean restrooms on site or nearby, necessary walking from parking to site, any clarification needed from the attached maps) Type requested site visit information here. Add driving direction behind this form as an attachment. Southwest Greenbelt -4480 S. Huron St. Englewood, CO 80110 Meeting location at project site: Southwest Greenbelt park identification sign. Meeting location will be directly across Huron Street from second grant application for Rotolo Park Playground Redevelopment. There are no restrooms available . • • • Driving directions to 4480 S Huron St, Englewood, CO 80110-5634 on Yahoo Maps, Ori... Page I of2 Map & Directions I Map Only 11 Directions Only I I Print I El 5 Hotels In Englewood CO booking.com/Englewood-Hotels Lowesl price guarantee! Book your Hotel In Englewood co YAHOO! MAPS ~ 6934 S Lima St, Englewood, CO 80112-3881 " 4480 S Huron St, Englewood, CO 8011 ~5634 Total Distance: 9.84 ml-Total Time: 24 mlns Maplayout@ 0 0 Rotolo Parle Playground and Southwest Greenbelt ara directly across the street from each other. 161 APA • ·'c:, !!! - f1 ~~ ~ 6934 S Uma St, Englewood, CO 80112-3881 Head toward E Briarwood Ave on S Lima St 4, Tum left onto E Arapahoe Pl (CQ-88) " Take ramp onto 1-25 N r Take exit 199 toward C0-88IBdevlew Avenue Expand All Gofor0.3 ml Hide Gofor1.4 mi Hide Go for 1.9 mi Hide Gofor0.3ml Hide Ad https://maps.yahoo.com/obpldirections/?lat-=39.61309414625365&1on=-104.927S016784... 12/21/2015 • • • Driving directions to 4480 S Huron St, Englewood, CO 80110-5634 on Yahoo Maps, Ori... Page 2 of2 ., Tum left onto E Belleview Ave (C0-88) Gofor4.6ml Hide r+ Tum right onto S Broadway St (C0-75) Gofor0.7ml Hide ., Tum left onto W Stanford Ave Gofor0.5ml Hide r+ Tum right onto S Huron St Go for 111 ft Hide Arrive at S Huron SL Your destination Is on the right. Hide <;> 4480 S Huron St, Englewood, CO 80110-5634 Expand All When uslnq any driving dit&<:lions or map , It Is a good Idea to double c:11eck and make sure lhe 10ad s1iH emts, wafdl out lor C01'15t111Ct!on, and follow al trafflc safely p111Cautlona . Tills Is 011ly ta be used as an aid In planning https://maps.yahoo.com/obp/directions/?lat=39.6130941462S36S&lon=-104.9275016784... 12/21/201S • Part G 8. Evidence of commitment to long-term maintenance • • • • {' C T y 0 F E N G DEPARTMENT O F PARKS AN D Arapahoe County Open Space and Trails Advisory Board 6934 S. Lima Street, Unit A Centennia l, CO 80112 December 9, 2015 Re: Long Term Maintenance Dear Open Space Advisory Board, L E w 0 0 RE C REATI O N The City of Englewood Parks and Recreation Department is committed to the long-term maintenance and management of all Englewood parks and park infrastructure within the City . The City of Englewood allocates funds for the long-term maintenance, repair and replacement of park infrastructure. Ongoing maintenance functions include: sign maintenance, sign repair/replacement, graffiti removal and landscape maintenance. The Parks and Recreation Department is funded annually through the City of Englewood's General Fund as part of the core services provided to the citizens of the City of Englewood. Maintenance of the Englewood Gateway Enhancements is currently included in all long-term maintenance programs and activities and will continue to be a part of all such activities into the future. Sincerely, Dorothy Hargrove Director Parks, Recreation and Library City of Englewood 1155 W . Oxford Avenue En gl ew ood, Colorado 80 110 Phone 3 03-76 2-2680 Fa x 303 -762-2688 www .e ngl ewoodgov.o rg D • Part G 9. Evidence of property ownership/legal access • • • • • Arapahoe County-Parcel Search Page 1 of I New Search PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List: Ownel'llhlp Type: Owner Addl'9ss: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: Legal Due: 2015 Apptalsed Value 201s Awssed Value 031001838 1971-28-3-00-045 2609 S Raritan St Englewood •Photo I View Parcel Map Englewood City Of Fee Simple Ownership 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Vacant Unplatted Parcels 2942 .00 1.8600 Printer Friendly Tieasurer'1 Tax lnfonnatlon Sales by Tax Year and Nelghbomood 2015/20111 2013/2014 2011/2012 2009/2010 2007/2008 2005/200& Complete Neighborhood Sales lnfonnaHon HlstO/}' Tax Olalrlct Le'Jies Beg At Nw Cor Se 1/4 Sw 1/4 Sec 28-4-68 Th S 824 Ft Th E 30 Ft To True Pob Th Se 372.3 Ft & 230.05 Ft & 705.73 Ft MIL Th Nely To Se Cor Of Lot 7 Blk 2 Tejon Ind Park Th Nwly 334 .51 Ft & 470.98 Ft Th W 517.43 Ft Th S To True Pob Total 239,940 69,583 Building 0 0 2014 MIii Levy: Land 239,940 69,583 72.792 Land Line Units Lind Value Land Use 1.8600 AC 239,940 Vac Unplatted > 1.0 Acre but< 5.0 Acres Nola: Land Line data above corresponds to the lnltJal 11ppra/ad value llfld dofls not ~fleet subsequent appeal re/atlld adjustments. if any. • Not am pan:els hawt avaHable photos/ sketches In some cases a sketch may be dllllallt ta read. Please ccnlact Ile Assessors Office for assistance. Measurements taken from the exterior of the b\ildlng . The Arapahoe County Assessors Olllce does not wamlllly the acancy of any lkelch, nor assumes any responsibllty or liability to any user. Although l0fflfl parcels may have multiple buldlngs and photos, at this lime our 1ystem Is limited to 1 akek:h and 1 photo per parcel number. Sony for any Inconvenience . New Search http://parcelsearch.arapahoegov.com/PPINum.aspx 12/21/2015 • • • PIN: 031001978 AIN: 1971-28-3-00-064 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 031003482 AIN: 1971-28-3-06-036 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of Northwest Greenbelt Property Ownership Continued • • • Arapahoe County-Parcel Search New Search PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List: Ownership Type: Owner Address: Clty/State/ZJp: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: 032003201 2077-10-2-09-020 *Photo I View Parcel Map I Englewood City Of Fee Simple Ownership 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Wollenwebers 2nd Add Blk 7 & B 2517.00 0.9200 Page 1 of 1 Printer Friendly Treauer'1Tax Information Sales by Tax Ytat and Nelghborhoocl 2015/2018 2013/2014 2011/2012 2009/2010 2007/2008 2005(2()06 Complete Neighborhood Sales lnfonnallon History Tax Disltlct Levies LegalDesc: Lot 3 & Lot 4 & Por Oesc As Beg 200 Ft N Of Sw Cor Lot 2 Th E BO Ft Th Se 96 Ft Th Se 127 .9 Ft Th E 88.66 Ft Th N 50 Ft Th Nw 219 .71 Ft Th W 125 Ft Th S 25 Ft To Beg Davolt Sub 2015 Appta/Wd Value 2015 Assessed Value Total 500 145 Building 0 0 2014 MIii Levy: Land 500 145 72.792 Land Line Units Land Value Land Use 1.0000 LT 500 Tract Nole. Lend Line data abo~ com,spond$ to IN Initial eppra/Wd value I/Id does not ran«t Slbwquent t1ppell raleted adjustments, H any. • Not al parcels have available photos / lkelches. In aome cases a sketch may be dilf'iallt to read . Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance. Measurements laken flOm the elderior of Iha building. The Arapahoe County Aaeasora Office does not warranty the accuracy cf any 1ketch, nor usumes any rasponslblllty Of Nabllty to any user. Allhough same parcels may have multiple buildings and photos, at this time cu system II fimlted ID 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel nunber. Sorry for any Inconvenience. New Search http://parcelsearch.arapahoegov.com/PPINum.aspx 12/21/2015 Southwest Greenbelt • Property Ownership Continued PIN: 032003367 PIN: 032005530 AIN: 2077-10-2-10-024 AIN: 2077-10-2-20-026 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 032005700 AIN: 2077-10-2-22-001 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 032005891 AIN: 2077-10-2-22-024 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 032005653 • AIN: 2077-10-2-21-034 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 032005670 AIN: 2077-10-2-21-037 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 032005378 AIN: 2077-10-2-20-006 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 032005521 AIN: 2077-10-2-20-025 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of • • • • Arapahoe County-Parcel Search New Search PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner Ust: Ownership Type: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: LegalDesc: 2015 Appraised Value 2015 Assessed Value 032567490 2077-03-1 -13-049 •Photo I Vrew Parcel Map Englewood City Of Fee Simple Ownership 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood , CO 80110-2373 Mansfield Add 1526.00 0 .0430 E 9.61 Ft Of Lot 3 Sandras Sub Total 500 145 Building 0 0 2014 MIii Levy: Land 500 145 72.792 Land Line Units Land Value Land Use 1.0000 LT 500 Tract Page I of l Printer Friendly Treasurers Tax Information Sales by Tax Year and Neighbomood 2015/201!1 2013/2014 2011/2012 200912010 200712008 2005/2006 Complete Neighborhood Safes lnfonnation History Tax District Levies Note Land Line data above =spotlds to the initlal appraistffl value and ewes not reflect subsequent appeal relattld adjustments, if any . • Not all parcels have available pholos / sketches. In some cases a sketch may be difficult lo reacl. Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance Measurements taken from the exterlof of the buHd ng . The Arapahoe County Assessors Office cloes not warranty the accuracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responsibHl ty or liability to any user. Although some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos, al this time our system Is Umited lo 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sorry for any Inconvenience. New Search http://parcelsearch .arapahoegov.com/PPINum.aspx 12/21/2015 • PIN: 031941229 AIN: 2077-03-1-13-029 Full Owner list: Englewood, City of PIN: 031941237 AIN: 2077-03-1-13-030 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 031941245 AIN: 2077-03-01-13-031 Full Owner list: Englewood, City of PIN: 032410051 AIN: 2077-03-1-00-016 • Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 031941091 AIN: 2077-03-1-13-007 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 033244281 AIN: 2077-03-1-13-050 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 031941024 AIN: 2077-03-1-12-004 Full Owner list: Englewood, City of • Hosanna Field Property Ownership Continued PIN: 031941016 AIN: 2077-03-1-12-003 Full Owner list: Englewood, City of PIN: 031940991 AIN: 2077-03-1-12-001 Full Owner list: Englewood, City of PIN: 032525134 AIN: 2077-03-1-05-025 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 031940508 AIN: 2077-03-06-010 Full Owner list: Englewood, City of PIN: 031940605 AIN: 2077-03-1-07-016 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 032594233 AIN: 2077-03-1-07-030 Full Owner list: Englewood, City of PIN: 031940591 AIN: 2077-03-1-07-010 Full Owner list: Englewood, City of • PIN: 031940583 AIN: 2077-03-1-07-009 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 032594209 AIN: 2077-03-1-07-027 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 031943329 AIN : 2077-03-2-00-010 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 031943591 AIN: 2077-03-2-01-021 • Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 031943302 AIN: 2077-03-2-00-008 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 033105931 AIN: 2077-03-2-36-001 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 031943442 AIN: 2077-03-2-01-001 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of • Hosanna Field Property Ownership Continued PIN: 032410027 AIN: 2077-03-1-00-015 Full Owner List: Englewood School Dist #1 PIN: 032567481 AIN: 2077-03-1-13-048 Full Owner List: Englewood School Dist #1 • • Englewood Schools A Relentless Focus On Learning December 16, 2015 Arapahoe County Open Space 6934 S. Lima St, Unit A Centennial, CO 80112 Dear Arapahoe County Open Space, Englewood Schools and the City of Englewood, Department of Parks and Recreation have an agreement regarding park usage and maintenance for the following locations, which Englewood Schools is the property owner: • Clayton Field-4600 S. Fox Street, Englewood, CO 80110 • Hosanna Athletic Complex-3700 S. Logan Street. Englewood CO, 80113 Englewood Schools is granting permission to the City of Englewood, Department of Parks and Recreation, allowing them legal access at both locations, in order to replace signage on said properties. Both of these locations currently have park signs that will be replaced with the new gateway enhancements once Englewood Parks and Recreation receives the expected grant funding earmarked for this project. New gateway enhancements will improve the overall look of the parks and athletic fields. With new signage, these locations will convey to the citizens of Englewood as well as visitors, that our city, schools and open space are valued and maintained. Englewood Schools does support the City's grant application for Gateway Enhancements and is excited to be collaborating with them on this project. Sincerely, ~ Patty H(orahan Assistant Superintendent Englewood Schools Roscoe Davidson Administration Building • 4101 S. Bannock St • Englewood, CO 80110 • Phone: 303-761 -7050 • • • Arapahoe County-Parcel Search New Search PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List: Ownership Type: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: 031041023 1971-35-3-04-004 "Photo I View Parcel Map Englewood City Of Fee Simple Ownership 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Non-Ind Englewood 3586 .00 1.0330 Page 1 of 1 Printer Friendly Treasurer's Tax lnfonru'ltlon Sales by Tax Year and Neighborhood 2015/2016 2013/2014 2011/2012 2009/2010 2007/2008 2005/2006 Complete Neighbomood Sales lnformatlon History Tax District Levies Legal Desc: S 10 Ft Lot 10 All Lots 11-16 & Lots 35-40 Blk 16 Evanston Bdwy Add 2nd Fig Also Lot 17 & Lot 34 N 112 OfVac E Eastman Pl & 1/2 Vac 5 Marion St Adj To Lots 34-36 & S 10 Ft or Lot 37 2015 Appraised Vah.Je 2015 Asso~ Value Total 697,546 202,288 Bulldlng 0 0 2014 MIii Levy: Land 697,546 202,288 72.792 Land Une Units Land Value Land Use 45003.0000 SF 697,546 Vacant Commercial Lots Nole. Land Line data above comisponds to the Initial eppralsed value and does not refltld subS&quent appHI related lldjuslmonJs, if any • Not all parcels have ava llable photos I sketches . In some cases a sketch may be dllf'ieull lo read. P:ease CXllllad the Assessors Office for assistance Measurements taken from the exterior of !he building . The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy of any skelch, nor auumes any responslblUty or Uablllty lo any user Although some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos, at thls tlme our system Is lim ted to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sorry for any Inconvenience . New Search http://parcelsearch.arapahoegov.com/PPINum.aspx 12/21/2015 Barde Park • Property Ownership Continued PIN: 031040914 AIN: 1971-35-3-03-006 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of • - • • • Arapahoe County-Parcel Search New Search PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List: Ownership Type: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: Legal Desc: 2015 Appra/$ed V1/ue 2015 Assessed Value 031013097 1971-34-1-01-010 "Photo I View Parcel Map Englewood City Of Fee Simple Ownership 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Non-Ind Englewood 3586 .00 0.3680 Lot 3 Jordan Sub Exempt Total 248 ,372 72,028 Building 0 0 2014 MIii Levy: Land 248,372 72 ,028 72 .792 Land Une Units Land Value Land Use 16024.0000 SF 248 ,372 Vacant Commercial Lots Page 1 of 1 Printer Friendly Treastnr's TaJt lnfolTnatlon Safes by Tax Year and Neighborhood 2015/2018 2013/2014 2011/2012 2009/2010 200712008 2005/2006 Complete Neighborhood Sales Information HfslOl)I Tax District Levies Note : Lind Line data above carresponds to the lnHial appraiS&d value and does not reflect subsequent appeal related adjuslmeflts. If any . • Not au parcels have ava ilable photos I sketches In some cases a sketch may be dJficult to read . Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from ltle exterior ol lhe bufkling . The Arapahoe County AssesSOB Otrice does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch , nor assumes any responslbnity or llabllity to any user. Although some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos , at this time our syslem Is limited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sorry for any Inconvenience . New Search http://parcelsearch.arapahoegov.com/PPINum.aspx 12/21/2015 • • • Arapahoe County-Parcel Search New Search PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List: Ownership Type: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code : Acreage: Land Use: 033744497 1971-34-2-24 -030 *Photo I View Parcel Map Englewood City Of Fee Simple Ownership 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Non-Ind Englewood 3586 .00 0.1340 Pagel of 1 Printer Friendly Treasurer's Tax lnfonna Uon Sales by Tax Year and Neighborl100d 2015/2018 2013/2014 2011/2012 2009/2010 2007/2008 2005/2008 Complete Neighborhood Sales lnformatlon History Tax District Levies Legal Desc: Lots 25 & 26 Ex E 23 Ft Of N 7 .5 Ft Of Sd Lot 25 & Ex N 7 .5 Ft Of Sd Lot 26 For Alley Tog With Portion Of Vac Alley Adj Sd Loi 25 BIi< 2 Taylor's Add 2015 App,aised Value 2015 Assessed Value Sale Total 90 ,675 26,296 Book Page A914 5092°Mu1tlSc:hed Bulldlng Land 0 90,675 0 26 ,296 2014 MIii Levy: 72.792 Date Price 11-06-1998 0 Land Line Units Land Value Land Use Type 5850 .0000 SF 90,675 Vacant Commercial Lots Nate Land Line data above corresponds to the Initial appraised value end does net rvflect subsaquent appeal related adjustments, ii any. • Not au parcels have available photos I sketches In some cases a sketch may be diff'ICU!t to read . Please contact the Asaessor.s Office for assistance Measurements taken from the exterior of the building The Arapahoe County Assesaoni Ofl'ic:e does not warranty the accuracy of any aketch , nor assumes any responslbifity or llablllly to any user Although some parcels may have multiple bulldlngs and photos , at this time our system Is limited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. SOIT}' tor any Inconvenience. New Search http://parcelsearch.arapahoegov.com/PPINum.aspx 12/21/2015 Depot • Property Ownership Continued PIN: 033744501 AIN: 1971-34-2-24-031 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of PIN: 033744519 AIN: 1971-34-2-24-032 Full Owner List: Englewood, City of • • • • • New Search PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full OWner List Ownership Type: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: LegalDesc: 2015 Apprai:sad Value 2015 Asseuec/ Value Building An,a 034835504 2077-04-3-00-071 •Photo Sketch I Vi ew Parcel Map Engl ewood City Of Fee Simple Ownership 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood , CO 80110-2373 Englewood Golf Course 3223 .00 53 .8100 Golf Courses Printer Friendly Treasurefs Tax lnlormatloo Sales by Tax Year and Neighborhood 20 15/201 6 2013/2014 2011/2012 2009/2010 2007/2008 2005/2006 Complete Neighborhood Sales lnfonnalio n Hisloly Tex Dis!tict tellieS That Part Of The Sw 1/4 Sec 4-5-68 Desc As Beg At The Nw Cor Of Sd Sw 1/4 Th E 1945 Ft MIL Th Sw 141 .15 Ft & 46 .09 Ft Th Se 71.81 Ft Th Sw 94.85 Ft Th Se 104 .93 Ft Th Sw 73.39 Ft Th Se 78.65 Ft& 135 ,36 Ft Th Sw440,93 Ft Th W57.93 Ft Th S 177.87 Ft Th W 1949.3 Ft To A Pt On The W Line Of Sd Nw 1/4 Th N To Beg Sec 4-5-68 Total 818,634 237,404 Building 1 Building 1 Building 549,584 159,379 2014 MIii Levy: Attributes Quality Grade Improvement Type Architectural Floors Year Built Construction Type Description Basement Total Gross Building Area (Commercial) Bldg Total Area: Land 269,050 78,025 80.237 Recorded Average Golf Courses Clubhouse 1.00 1980 D -Wood or Steel Studs Frame SqFt 8397 8397 8397 Land Lin• Units Land Value Land Use 53.8100 AC 269,050 Golf Course Nole · Land LJne dala abotl& corresponds to Ille Initial appraiud value and doe$ not rvfl«:t ~ llpfJNI l'lllated adjustm.nt,s, II any • Not a~ parcels have avaiable photos f sketches . In some cases a sketch fflilY be dlrlCUII to lead. Please contact the AssessoD Office for assiSlance Measurements taken from !he exteriot of the building The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty ltle accuracy of any sketch. nor ass1.111eS any respon5 bility or liability to any user. Although 501M parce'.s may have multiple buidlngs and photos . at this time our syslem Is limited ID 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel manber Sony '°' any Inconvenience. New Se arch • • • New Search PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List: Ownership Type: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: LegalDesc: 032006587 2077 -10-2-27-002 4600 S Fox St Englewood •Photo I View Parcel Map Englewood School Dist #1 Fee Simple Ownership 4101 S Bannock St Englewood, CO 80110-4605 Englewood Ind Area 3537.00 1.9200 Plots 1-4 Rundgrens Sub Printer Friendly Treasurer's Tax lnronnalion Sales by Tax Year and Nelghborhood 201512016 201312014 2011/2012 2009/2010 2007/2008 2005/2006 Complete Nelghbomood Sales lnrormauon Histo,y Tax District Levies ... -··------------------------------------------- 2015AppraIMd V1/u1t 2015 AssasMd Va.ue Total 627,264 181,907 Building 0 0 2014 MIii Levy: Land 627,264 181,907 72.792 Land Line Units Land Value Land Use 1.9200 AC 627,264 Recreation Nole. Land Line data above COt18sponds to the Initial appraiaJd value and does not ,eflllct sub$equent appeal fBlated adjuslmenl$. if any . • Not all pan:els have avallatlle photos / sketches. In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read. Please ccntact the Assessors Office fOI" assistance. Measurements taken from the exterior or the buMding The Arapahoe COUn1y Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy or any sketch, nor nsumes any responsibility or liability to any user. AllllolJgh some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos, at this lime our system Is limited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number Sony ror any Inconvenience New Search '' .. • • • PIN: 032006579 AIN: 2077-10-2-27-001 Clayton Field Property Ownership Continued Full Owner List: Englewood School Dist #1 .. •Eli= Englewood Schools A Relentless Focus On Learning • • December 16, 2015 Arapahoe County Open Space 6934 S. Lima St, Unit A Centennial, CO 80112 Dear Arapahoe County Open Space, Englewood Schools and the City of Englewood, Department of Parks and Recreation have an agreement regarding park usage and maintenance for the following locations, which Englewood Schools is the property owner: • Clayton Field-4600 S. Fox Street, Englewood, CO 80110 • Hosanna Athletic Complex-3700 S. Logan Street. Englewood CO, 80113 Englewood Schools is granting permission to the City of Englewood, Department of Parks and Recreation, allowing them legal access at both locations, in order to replace signage on said properties. Both of these locations currently have park signs that will be replaced with the new gateway enhancements once Englewood Parks and Recreation receives the expected grant funding earmarked for this project. New gateway enhancements will improve the overall look of the parks and athletic fields. With new signage, these locations will convey to the citizens of Englewood as well as visitors, that our city, schools and open space are valued and maintained. Englewood Schools does support the City's grant application for Gateway Enhancements and is excited to be collaborating with them on this project. Sincerely, Patty H#irahan Assistant Superintendent Englewood Schools Roscoe Davidson Administration Building • 4101 S. B:mnock St • Englewood, CO 80110 • Phone: 303-761-7050 • Part G 10. GIS shapefile • • River Ru r1 • • • PartG 11. Other ■ Tacito Design-Proposed Park Identification Sign ■ Proposed Landscape Design ■ Council Communication 1999 ■ Request for Proposal -City Entryway Mounumentation ■ Suggested Scope of Work-City of Englewood Signage Projects-1999 ■ Tacito Design-Design Intent Statement ■ Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-May 2002 ■ Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-October 2012 ■ Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-November 2012 ■ Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-January 2013 ■ Tacito Design-Total Design Fee Contract Amount ■ PKM Design-Park Signage Graphics Invoice NOTES see Large Park Identification Sign for similar details • 5'-9" 5'-4 " 5'--0" 2· ~ a, ~ MONTGOMERY ANDERSEN PARK \ . ~ \ ' ~'.,~....,.. ... • 6'-0" 6'-3" 1'-6" 11/4" 2· tC> 2· 4" 1 1/2" 1'--0" 1'-3' 3/4" TACITO DESIGN INC 1743 WAZEE STREET SUITE325 DENVER. COLORADO 80202 303 .8509197 bob@tacitodes1gn com www 1ac11od11s1gn com GRAPHIC DESIGN WAYFINOING SIGNAGE SYSTEMS PACKAGING City of Englewood Department of Parks & Recreation Small Park Identification Sign 1/2"=1'-0" Preliminary Design t1 .05.t 2 Design Development lt.15.12 Design Development 12.14.12 Final De sign 12.20.t2 DR AFT 10.23.15 Final Design 10.30.tS Sheet number 2.0 Proposed Landscape Design • 16' • Daytily ■ Dianlhus CITY OF ENGLEWOOD SMALL PARK SIGN -IRRIGATED • Proposed Landscape Design 12'3" PLAN VIEW Conellower [:2j Basket or Gold • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD SMALL PARK SIGN -NON-IRRIGATED Proposed Landscape Design •------- • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD SIGN-NO PLANT MATERIAL GI)· ol Englewood • • • COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: October i 8 , 1999 AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Entry Port Monumentation. District 11 C ii Signage, and Parks Signage INITIATED BY : Department of STAFF SOURCE: Art Scibelli, Business Neighborhood and Business Development Development Coordinator COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Quality of life. South Broadway Action Plan action item. No previous Council action. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends that Council award the design contract to Tacito Design . BACKGROUND. ANALYSIS. AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED: Staff interviewed two design consultants for the Entry Port Monumentation, district Signage and Parks Signage contract. Tacito Design has extensive experience designing and constructing public facility signs . Tacito's graphics and designs were more innovative and exciting than those of the competing firm. This consulting contract is about enhancing Englewood's community image and identity within the metro area -letting people know when they have arrived in Englewood. It ties together the commercial corridors, CityCenter, and parks; one community, one identity. It takes into account the design elements that are already well underway, i.e . CityCenter logo, federal green color (similar to Englewood's new forest green color), banners on South Broadway, ornamental ironwork, colored concrete banding, and median design. It is a design effort that is intended to coordinate common community design elements . The entry port design proposal includes identity monuments at four key locations; North and South Broadway and East and West Hampden entry ports . Funding has been requested in the FY 2001 and FY 2002 capital budgets to construct these entry ports. District signage will be designed for the four distinct districts along South Broadway. Signage for parks and recreational facilities will be designed concurrently to prov ide for a unified community design theme throughout Englewood . ----• • • REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL CITY ENTRYWAY MONUl\'IENTATION Purpose The City of Englewood is interested in strengthening community image and heightening aware- ness of Englewood. The selected consultant will assist the City of Englewood in the preparation of design development level Entry Monumentation Concepts (plan, elevation, and details), as well as with public meetings. The Entry Monumentation concepts will be developed in coordi- nation with City staff and citizens and will address topics including potential location, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, the desired image for Englewood, cost, materials, and methods of construction. Approach The selected consultant will attend a series of Work Sessions that include City staff, Design Ad- visory Committee, and residents , as appropriate. The selected consultant will work with the City to generate alternatives for each of four potential locations for evaluation. The alternatives should include visual presentations . The consultant should seek agreement from the City as to which alternative best reflects the tone, style, and image of the corridor and the City. The monuments will be located at the Englewood/Denver border, the Englewood/Littleton border on Broadway, the Sheridan/Englewood border, and the Denver/Englewood border on Hampden A venue. It is important that each entry reflect a unique nature reflective of the location and neighborhood, and still project a consistency of style through common design elements and/or materials . All entry ports should be representative of an Englewood image. The Englewood im- age will be developed through discussion with the public, staff, and through review of back- ground materials provided by the City. The consultant should assist the City in seeking community support by leading meetings as ap- propriate, and by sharing ideas and listening carefully to community issues. The consultant should be an experienced environmental graphic designer with five or more demonstrable years of experience with civic projects of this scale. Designer must be able to design, document, and manage a large scale project. Advisory Committee The selected consultant will work with the Design Advisory Committee for the project consisting of policy~rnakel'S, representative ~South ,Broadway and Hampden -Avenue 0 merchants, residents; and Gity 'staff. This Design Advisory Committee would act as a sounding board and advocacy group to guide the work and to communicate with others in their constituencies . • • Suggested Scope of Work A. Entry Port Design: 4 Key Locations (submit separate proposed budget for this activity) l . Background Review 2 . • Review existing information, photos, base maps, background materials pre- pared and gathered by the City; • Review City of Englewood history to assist in creating a design image; • Review information for potential locations for monumentation along the South Broadway and Hampden corridors, characteristics, limitations, and opportuni- ties at the following four specific locations: a) Automotive dealerships. Designer should examine city maps to determine exact city boundary location. b) The Hampden Avenue Sheridan/Englewood border (across from City- Center Englewood). c) The northern South Broadway border of Denver and Englewood at Yale Avenue. d) Hampden Avenue Cherry Hills Village/Englewood border. Public Input • The designer shall conduct a total of six meetings with the entry port/banner design team. This committee shall have community and corridor representa- tion. • Designer shall discuss issues on potential monurnentation locations, principles and objectives for rnonumentation design, and City image with committee members. • Designer shall create a report documenting principles and objectives for the monumentation. This report should take the form of a design intent statement, which shall represent an objective list of criteria to which all parties can agree before design begins. The design intent statement should be a vehicle that al- lows the design team to build consensus amongst interested parties. 3. Analysis • Prepare draft concept for monumentation locations identified in Item I above. a) Southern south Broadway Englewood/Littleton Border; • • December 16 , 1999 Design Intent Sta tement/ 2nd Draft TACITO DESIGN INC 5655 SOUT H YOSE MITE STR EET SU I TE 201 GREENWOOD VILLAGE , COLDRAOO 80111 JOJ 850 931 5 FAX JOJ 85 0 919 7 VO I CE The purpose of this Design Intent Statement is to establish goals and objectives for the City of Englewood Signage projects in a manner which will help to build consensus among interested parties . The Des ign Intent Statement will be used throughout the design process to verify that the design concepts and final solution successfully meet the needs of the project. These statements are not presented in any particular order. 1. South Broadway shall be the unifying essence of this project's signage efforts . 2. Complement existing and/or planned Englewood Streetscape Program . 3. Strengthen community image, unifying all areas under one civic identity . 4. Entry Port Monuments shall set the design theme . District signage and parks & recreation signage shall follow suit with a "family resemblance· to the Entry Port Monuments. 5. Entry Port Monuments shall shall emphasize city gateways with large, vehicular-scale element(sl that respect the history of the City and acknowledge pedestrians . These four monuments will be similar to one another, yet allow for the differences in each location . 6. 7. District Signage shall identify unique areas within the City of Englewood , calling attent ion to each area's amenities, past and/or present These signs will be similar to one another, yet allow for the differences in each district Parks and Recreation Signage shall identify and celebrate the presence of City parks and open space, increasing the awareness of vehicular and pedestrian audiences . . . • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PARKS AND RECREATION CO1\1MISSION May 9, 2002 Englewood Recreation Center, Adult Activity Room 1155 W. Oxford Avenue 5:30pm AGENDA I. Call to Order II. Approval of Minutes for April 11, 2002 III. Scheduled Visitors (presentation limited to 10 minutes) IV. Unscheduled Visitors (presentation limited to 5 minutes) V. Park Signage -Lee and Bob Gnaegy, Tacito Design VI. Recreation Project Bond Update -Black VII. Golf Medal Award -Black VIII. Golf Course City Administration Fee -Black IX. Water Issues -Black x. Off-Leash Park Pilot Program Update-Lee XI. Centennial Park Update -Black XII. Cultural Arts Commission Update -Moore XIII. City Center Update -Garrett XIV. Director's Choice Capital Projects xv. Commission Member's Choice XVI. Adjournment Attachments a. b. c. Minutes of April 11, 2002 2002 Englewood Holiday Parade Memorandum MOA Design and Build Information d. e. f . April 28, 2002 Denver Post Article regarding Golf Courses National Senior Health & Fitness Day Flyer Memorandum from Ben Greene regarding Fires on City Property Please notify Debby Severa at 303-762-2684 by Tuesday, May 7, 2002 if you are unable to attend. • • • V. VI. VII. PARK SIGN AGE -LEE AND BOB GNAEGY. TA CITO DESIGN The meeting was turned over to Dave Lee, Open Space Manager, who introduced Bob Gnaegy of Tacito Design. Gnaegy began discussion on park signage for the City by showing Commission members the four designs under consideration. Gnaegy explained that he had been working with Dave Lee, Austin Gomes, and others from Community Development to create a family of signs for Englewood parks. Gnaegy said that the purpose of the signage is to unify and create attention for the park system. Gnaegy explained that the signs would be double-faced and placed in conspicuous locations in each park. Gnaegy added that there was a range of detail options that could change according to budget. Commission members discussed size, maintenance concerns, etc. Chairperson Gomes asked Gnaegy what the cost would be for the signs. Gnaegy responded that the estimate was $9,000 -$14,000 apiece if purchased six at a time, including installation. Chairperson Gomes asked Lee to tally Commission members' votes for one of the four designs . Design #2 was chosen. Gnaegy told Commission members that a revised design would be presented to Commission again in the future . RECREATION BOND PROJECT UPDATE -BLACK Gary Hultberg, Recreation Manager, announced that the Rec Center and Malley Center parts of the Bond Project were on schedule and on budget. Hultberg said that requests for qualifications had just gone out for the aquatics center, and that construction should begin by February or March of next year. Hultberg added that the aquatics project was expected to be completed by Spring of 2004. GOLD MEDAL A WARD -BLACK Black returned discussion to the Gold Medal Award briefly discussed at the beginning of the meeting . Black said that just to be selected as a finalist for the award was very important, and says a lot about Englewood leadership and staff. Black added that this was the Department's second time as a finalist, the last time being in 1970. Chairperson Gomes asked when the award would be presented. Black replied that the announcement would be made at the National Parks and Recreation Association convention in October. VIII. GOLF COURSE CITY ADMINISTRATION FEE -BLACK Black announced that the Director of Finance Administration had discussed with him asking the Golf Course to pay an administrative fee to the City of $130,000 per year. The Director of Finance Administration suggested raising fees $2 per round to cover the fee . Black and Commission members discussed the importance of keeping the fees low, citing a Denver Post article included in members' packets regarding the current glut of golf courses. Commission member Waldman asked what the administrative fee was for. Black replied that it is to cover services that other departments (Human Resources, City Attorney, etc.) do for the Golf Course. Discussion ensued . Council Member Garrett added that City Council is looking at all enhancements and cutbacks to balance the City's revenue shortfall. Jerrell Black mentioned the possibility of getting the funds from the Golf Course's reserve fund of $600,000, but added that there were numerous other Golf Course projects that have been projected for those funds . The Commission was not in support of raising golf fees or using funds from the Golf Fund balance. Council Member Garrett said he would convey the Board's concerns to City Council . . ,. • I. • • City of Englewood PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Minutes of October 11, 2012 Call to Order The regular monthly meeting of the Englewood Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Chairperson Gomes at the Malley Recreation Center, 3380 S. Lincoln Street. II . Present: Absent: Also Present: Approval of Minutes Austin Gomes , Chairperson Mitch Waldman, Vice Chairperson Mark Husbands, Commission Member Duane Tucker, Englewood Schools Liaison Donna Schnitzer, Cultural Arts Commission Liaison Jerrell Black , Ex-Officio Douglas Garrett, Commission Member Karen Miller, Commission Member Bob Mccaslin, City Council Liaison Dave Lee , Manager of Open Space Joe Sack , Recreation Manager Bob Spada , Golf Manager Joyce Musgrove, Recreation Program and Facility Supervisor Chairperson Gomes asked if there were any changes or corrections to the minutes of September 13, 2012. Director Black noted that the location of the meeting was incorrect and should read the Englewood Recreation Center. The minutes were approved as amended. Ill. Scheduled Public Comment There were no scheduled guests. IV. Unscheduled Public Comment V. There were no unscheduled guests. Park Siqnage Dave Lee, Manager of Open Space, told the Board that in 2002, new park signage information was brought to the Board for its review and approval. Lee distributed to the board members four examples of park signage that was shown to the Board in 2002. Lee noted that the Board chose option #2. Lee went on to explain that he wanted to bring forth discussion on the signage again because of wanting new signage at Duncan Park when it is developed. Englewood Schools Liaison Duane Tucker asked if there were any other reasons besides aesthetics that Design #2 was chosen. Lee replied no, explaining that the current signage is very outdated, dating back to the 1970's. Lee stated that in • • VI. VII. • 2002, the City had decided to move forward with new signage for the four entry points into Englewood but then the economy changed and it was put on the back burner. Black explained that Community Development had contracted with Tacitio Design to look at signage for the entry points into Englewood so the Department decided to partner with Community Development and have Tacito Design come up with some designs for park signage. Black reported that the Department spent approximately $15,000 for the conceptual designs. Discussion followed . Gomes asked where the new signage would be placed. Lee stated that the new signs would go where the existing park signs are with additional smaller scale signs going in at the secondary entries . Board members were told that the price listed on the information they received is 2002 dollars . Lee told the Board that the purchase of the new signage would be spread out, and not done all at once. Black explained to the Board that they wanted to have the Board look at the signage now so when they start developing Duncan Park, things will be in place. Discussion followed. The question was asked in regard to damage and vandalism to the signs. Black stated that the Department wants to make sure that part replacement is key and anything that is damaged or vandalized can be fixed or replaced. Discussion followed in regard to board members choice for signage . Design #2 was the Board's preference . A motion was made by Vice Chairperson Waldman and seconded by Commission Member Husband recommending that design option 2 be pursued for park signage for the City of Englewood parks. Ayes: Gomes, Waldman, Husband, Schnitzer, Tucker Nayes: None Motion passed. 2013 Budget Discussion turned to an update on the 2013 budget. Black stated that the 2013 budget will be going to second reading at Monday night's City Council meeting. Board members were told that Council had requested a two percent reduction in 2012 budgets with another two percent reduction going into 2013. Black explained that for Parks and Recreation, the reduction meant the elimination of a full-time Program Administrator position. Black reported that City Council is now requesting another one percent reduction going into 2013. Board members were told that the additional one percent reduction will mean the elimination of the Youth Program Administrator in addition to all youth programs, impacting approximately 7,000 participants. Black reported that at Monday night's City Council work session, Council decided to accept the budget as is without the additional one percent reduction and look at it again in February after holiday sales. Black noted that Council will vote Monday night as part of the second reading. Black told the Board that he needs to iterate that the budget cuts are way beyond a little here and a little there, that it is now into personnel and program cuts. Recreation Update Recreation Manager Joe Sack gave an update on Department events. In regard to the Freedom Service Dog's Festival of the Bastardino that was held on Saturday, September 8 th in Belleview Park and Pirates Cove, Sack reported that they have recently met with staff from Freedom Service Dogs for a debriefing. Sack passed • 1 •' ,. • I. • • City of Englewood PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Minutes of November 15, 2012 Call to Order The regular monthly meeting of the Englewood Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order at 5:30 p.m . by Chairperson Gomes at the Broken Tee Englewood Golf Course Maintenance Facility at 4000 S. Clay Street. II . Ill. Present: Absent: Also Present: Approval of Minutes Austin Gomes, Chairperson Mitch Waldman, Vice Chairperson Douglas Garrett, Commission Member Karen Miller, Commission Member Bob Mccaslin, City Council Liaison Duane Tucker, Englewood Schools Liaison Jerrell Black, Ex-Officio Mark Husbands, Commission Member Schnitzer, Cultural Arts Commission Liaison Dave Lee, Manager of Open Space Joe Sack, Recreation Manager Bob Spada, Golf Manager Wayne Niles, Golf Course Superintendent Chairperson Gomes asked if there were any changes or corrections to the minutes of October 11, 2012. There were none. The minutes were approved as presented. Scheduled Public Comment There were no scheduled guests. IV. Unscheduled Public Comment There were no unscheduled guests. V. Arapahoe County Open Space Grants Recreation Manager Joe Sack told the Board that the Department has received the unfortunate news from GOCO that it was not successful with its grant application for the development of Duncan Park. Sack reported that it was very competitive with forty seven grant applications requesting approximately $11.7 million and only nine grants awarded in the amount of $2.2 million. Sack stated that the Department will be contacting GOCO to get feedback on its application and will also be moving forward with its grant application with Arapahoe County Open Space. Discussion followed . A motion was made by Commission Member Douglas Garrett and seconded by Commission Member Karen Miller in support of the .. • • • VI. VII. VIII. Department of Parks and Recreation grant application submittal with Arapahoe County Open Space for the development of Duncan Park . Ayes: Nayes: Gomes, Waldman, Garrett, Miller, Mccaslin, Tucker None The motion passed. Parks Siqnage In regard to last month's discussion on park signage, Open Space Manager Dave lee reported that he now has five renditions of the sign (Option 2) that the Board had selected. Pictures of the five renditions were distributed to board members for their favorite. Lee explained that the signs are aluminum powder coated with epoxy paint and the letters are epoxied or glued on. lee also noted that the logos are solid all the way through and the signs are all easily maintained. Vice Chairperson asked if the signs are one or two sided. lee answered both. Englewood Schools liaison Duane Tucker asked in regard to prices for the five renditions. Lee replied that they are all the same price . Tucker asked if any of them fit in with existing signage. Lee replied that Option 1 fits in with signage at the Civic Center. Following discussion, board members agreed that their preference is Option 1 b with the flattened roof design from option 1 a . Golf Course Restaurant Bob Spada, Golf Manager, informed the Board that the restaurant contract with Jim Dadiotis, The Grill at Broken Tee, LLC will end on December 31, 2012 after eight years. Board members were told that the City went out to bid and only one bid was received. Spada noted that the one bid is from a vendor that comes with a lot of experience. Spada stated that they will be going to City Council on December 3rd for formal approval of the contract and the new vendor will begin on January 1, 2013. The Board was told that the restaurant will be shut down for the first week to do some maintenance work . Discussion followed in regard to the new owner, Craig Caldwell, and his experience . Waldman asked in regard to Dadiotis. Spada replied that he did not bid. Centennial Park Cyclo-Cross Race In regard to last month's discussion on the request to hold a cyclo-cross event at Centennial Park on Thanksgiving Day, lee reported that the group has decided to hold the race somewhere else. Lee stated that the group has said that they would still like to hold a race at Centennial Park sometime next year. IX. Cultural Arts Commission Update X. Black reported that the Cultural Arts Commission is currently considering several projects that it can do. Director's Choice Black told board members that generally in December a board meeting is not held and if the board agrees, the December meeting will be cancelled. However, Black explained that if any member wants a meeting or has an issued that they feel • .... • • • I. City of Englewood PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Minutes of January 10, 2013 Call to Order The regular monthly meeting of the Englewood Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order at 5:30 p.m . by Vice Chairperson Waldman at the Englewood City Center, City Council Conference Room, 1000 Englewood Parkway. II . Present: Absent: Also Present: Approval of Minutes Mitch Waldman, Vice Chairperson Douglas Garrett, Commission Member Mark Husbands, Commission Member Karen Miller, Commission Member Bob Mccaslin, City Council Liaison (arrived at 5:40pm) Duane Tucker, Englewood Schools Liaison Donna Schnitzer, Cultural Arts Commission Liaison Jerrell Black, Ex-Officio Austin Gomes, Chairperson Dave Lee, Manager of Open Space Joe Sack, Recreation Manager Bob Spada, Golf Manager Jeff Jones, Recreation Program/Facility Supervisor Vice Chairperson Waldman asked if there were any changes or corrections to the minutes of November 8, 2012. There were none. The minutes were approved as presented. Vice Chairperson Waldman asked if there were any changes or corrections to the minutes of December 13, 2012. There were none. The minutes were approved as presented. Ill. Scheduled Public Comment There were no scheduled guests. IV. Unscheduled Public Comment V. There were no unscheduled guests. Park Siqnaqe Recreation Manager Dave Lee informed board members that in their packet are examples of park signage with the changes that they had recommended at last month's meeting. Lee told the Board that the first sign in the packet is the Park Identification Sign that will be placed at the main entrance into the park. The second sign is the Small Park Identification Sign that will be placed at secondary entrances to the park. Lee reported that the other signs in the packet are examples of the Rules and Regulations sign and a park reservation information sign. Lee pointed out the Rules and Regulations sign will now include a QR Code • VI. VII. • • that will link the customer to the City's website. Commission Member Mark Husbands asked if park reservations can be made online. Lee stated that at this time they cannot. Recreation Manager Joe Sack reported that plans are to have online facility reservations in place later in the year. In regard to the park signage, commission members stated that they thought the new signage looked great. Duncan Park Grant Update Before discussion went to an update on the Duncan Park grant applications , Sack introduced Jeff Jones, the new Recreation Program & Facility Supervisor for the Englewood Recreation Center and stated that Jeff has been the Adult Sport Recreation Program Administrator for the City of Englewood for the last twenty years. Sack told the Board that the Department is very excited to have Jeff step up into the new position. Jeff told the Board about himself and his new responsibilities. Discussion turned to an update on grant applications for Duncan Park. Lee informed the Board that as they are aware, the Department was unsuccessful with its GOCO grant application in August of last year. Lee reported that he and Sack have been working diligently on an Arapahoe County Open Space grant application that will be due the beginning of February and another grant application for GOCO that is due in early March . Lee explained that they will be requesting $250,000 from Arapahoe County and $350,000 from GOCO. Waldman asked what the Department will do if it is unsuccessful w ith the grants. Lee replied that they will phase the project. Intergovernmental Agreement/Facility Usage. Englewood Schools Black informed the Board that the Department of Parks and Recreation and Englewood Schools are considering partnering together for an Arapahoe County Open Space grant for a synthetic turf field at Englewood High School. Black explained that a stipulation to all grant applications is that before the grant application can be submitted , all Intergovernmental Agreements need to be in place and finalized so a meeting has been scheduled with Brian Ewert, Englewood Schools Superintendent, to discuss the agreement. Black said that they hope to have the agreement completed in six months. Commission Member Miller asked where the field will be. Black explained that it is the practice field behind the stadium . Black then stated that they will be losing one of the fields at Hosanna which will result in lost revenue for the City. The Board was told that the School District has been very accommodating, agreeing that if a field is lost, the City can use the new synthetic turf field to compensate for lost revenue. Black discussed the current Intergovernmental Agreement that is in place between the City and School District and plans to revisit it and condense all City/School IGA agreements for inside and outside facility usage into one agreement. Black stated again that it is their hope to have the agreement in place by mid-year so can they can submit a grant application for 2014 funding . Waldman asked if the Department applies for an Arapahoe County grant for Duncan Park and then the Arapahoe County grant with the School District, will Arapahoe County award both grants. Black stated that he has seen agencies receive two grants though it is more unusual than common. Black said that GOCO will not award more than one grant to an entity per grant cycle while Arapahoe County will award up to two grants to an entity per cycle. • • • T 11 Ci to Dcs ig,,, In c. 5690 DTC 8011/mml S11irr 220 £:,1 Ta w,r EnJ./rU)Ot)d. Colar.1 do 801 I I 3 03 850 9 /9 ~ f,LY 303.850 93 15 Invoice 102095 July 18, 2002 Dave lee Parks & Recreation City of Englewood 1155 West Oxford Avenue Englewood, Colorado 80110 Re : Parks & Recreation Sign age PO #020187 Total design fee contract amount, Parks & Recreation Signage Fee depos it, 25 % of total design fee contract amount, PA1D Work to date, to BO '¼ completion Color laserprints for client coordination large format color output & mounting for Parks Commission presentation Total due, this invoice Oesign fee ba lance (50 %) Payment due August 2. 2002. Thank you . Federal Taxpayer Identification Number : 841 069 281 SB,525.00 120.00 112.37 $8,757.37 $15,500.00 <3,875 .00> <8,525.00> $3,100 .00 Bill To Dave Lee 7353 S. Alton Way, Sui t e 125 Cent ennial, Colorado 80112 phone 303.804.0080 fax 303 .804.0070 www.pkmdg.com City of Englewood Englewood Rec Cent €1 1155 W. Oxford Ave. Englewood, Colorado 80110 Item Description Field Review P .Miers -field review with Dave Lee Graphics P .Hendrix -sign graphics for Arapahoe County Grant Make payments to PKM Design Group, Inc. 7353 S. Alton Way, Suite 125, Centennial. CO 80112. ~ase-direct-all-billing-questions-to-?atricia-Miers a t" .804.0080 or at pkm@pkmdg.com. Invoice Date Invoice # 12/30/2014 1903 Project Park Sign Graphics Period Nov /Dec 2014 Qty Rate Amount 1 130.00 130.00 26.5 36.80 975.20 I Total $1,105.20 I