HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014 Ordinance No. 032. '
ORDINANCE NO. b)-
SERlES OF 2014
BY AUTHORITY
COUNCIL BILL NO. 31
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER GILLIT
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF 3265-3299 SOUTH LOGAN STREET
FROM R-1..C TO 3299 SOUTH LOGAN STREET RESIDENCES PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (PUD).
WHEREAS, Shadow Creek Homes, LLC submitted an application to rezone the properties from
R-1-C Single Unit Residential District (Small Lot Size} to the 3299 South Logan Street Residences
Planned Unit Development (PUD) which would allow for an enhanced residential development;
and
WHEREAS, this project is comprised of2 parcels (Parcel ID #1971-34-4-029 and Parcel ID
#1971-34-017) totaling 21,875 square feet, approximately .5022 acres; and
WHEREAS, the first parcel (south) parcel (lmown herein as Parcel 01} is located at the
Northwest comer of South Logan Street and East Floyd Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the second (north) parcel (lmown herein as Parcel 02) is located directly north of
Parcel O 1; and
WHEREAS, Presently Parcel 01 contains the building formerly housing the Englewood Shrine
Club, 6,750 square feet that will be converted into a two-unit residence, c111Tently zoned R-1-C; and
WHEREAS, Parcel 02 contains a single family home, 1150 square feet and a 2 car garage, 400
square feet, with an option to remodel, expand, or rebuild the home, currently zoned R-1-C; and
WHEREAS, the home at 3265 South Logan will be remodeled and updated, two new homes
will be added and the Shriner building will be divided into 2 units. Four new garages will be
added. The accessory dwelling units above three of the garages will be added as an option for their
customers; and
WHEREAS, two additional single family homes with rear detached 2 or 3 car garages, with an
option for detached accessory structure above, will be built on the new PUD Site, Parcel 01 and 02
will be reconfigured into five (5) lots: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5; and
WHEREAS, land to the north, south, and east of the subject property is zoned R-1-C Single
Unit Residential District, land directly to the west of the subject property is zoned MU-R-3-B NPO
Mixed Use Medium to High Density Residential and Limited Office District with a Neighborhood
Preservation Overlay; and
1
11 b i
WHEREAS, properties to the west and southwest of subject property contain several multi-unit
apartment buildings; and
WHEREAS, the proposed 3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD is located at the northwest
comer of South Logan Street and East Floyd Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the 3265-3299 South Logan Street site consists of two properties consisting of the
Shrine Club and a house at 3265 South Logan Street, totaling one-half acre; and
WHEREAS, the proposed 3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD will allow a maximum of
three (3) one-unit dwellings, one (1) two-unit dwelling and three (3) detached accessory structures
above garages that may be used as dwelling units; and
WHEREAS, the Unified Development Code does not currently address new detached accessory
units but many communities locally and nationally are adopting provisions into their code to allow
them; and
WHEREAS, the majority of the parking would be in detached garages with an additional
surface parking pad provided for each detached accessory structure, all of the designated parking is
accessed from the alley and meets the City's parking regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Traffic Department commented that garages setback from the alley more than 6
feet can become a problem with the rear end of cars extending into the alleys; and
WHEREAS, on street parking will be available on Floyd Avenue; and
WHEREAS, drainage plans have been approved by the Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Planned Unit Development procedure, the applicant conducted a
neighborhood meeting on November 7, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a Public Hearing on April 22, 2014;
and
WHEREAS, the PUD contains architectural character standards that require a mix of pattern
and color changes, a minimum masonry requirement or defined front porches, and a requirement
that building entries be clearly defined with architectural elements; and
WHEREAS, the exterior materials and colors of the detached accessory structure are required to
compliment the overall character of the principal dwelling; and
WHEREAS, provisions for roof pitches and flat roofs are included; and
WHEREAS, it should be noted that the conceptual building footprint shown on the Site Plan
and the proposed building elevations are subject to change; however, any changes would have to
meet the design standards and guidelines of the PUD.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS :
2
4
•
•
• Section 1. The Englewood City Council hereby finds that:
•
• The Planned Unit Development application is in conformance with Roadmap
Englewood: 2003 Comprehensive Plan.
• The property cannot be developed, or that no reasonable economic use of the property
can be achieved under the existing zoning, even through the use of conditional uses or a
reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjustments.
• The application is substantially consistent with the goals, objectives, design guidelines,
policies and any other ordinance, law, or requirement of the City.
• The rezoned property will not have a significant negative impact on those properties
surrounding the rezoned area and the general public health, safety and welfare of the
community are protected.
Section 2. The dedication of park land requirement will be satisfied by a fee in lieu payment
amount between $1,600 and $3,000.
Section 3. The 3299 South Logan Street Residences Planned Unit Development (PUD), for
property located at the northwest comer of South Logan Street and East Floyd Avenue, in the
City of Englewood, Colorado, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby approved.
Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 19th day of May, 2014 .
Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City's official newspaper on the 23 rd day of
May,2014.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City's official website beginning on the 21st day of
May, 2014 for thirty (30) days.
A Public Hearing was held on the 2nd day of June, 2014.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the 16th day of June, 2014.
Published by title in the City's official newspaper as Ordinance No. ~Series of 2014, on
the 20th day of June, 2014.
Published by title on the City's official website beginning on the 18th day of
June, 2014 for thirty (30) days.
3
=-;
I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the •
above and foregoing is ~~e copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by
title as Ordinance No. ~eries of 2014.
~L -. hi:....__A El~l. g; Y ~s
•
4
•
•
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A P•RCEL or LANO LOC•TEO IN THE SOUTHEAST I /4 or SECTIClN J4
T0'M.ISHIP , SOUTH, RANGE 68 W[Sl or TH[ 6 TH PRINOPlE MERIDIAN
CITY or ENWWOOO. COUNTY or ARAPAHOE. STATE or COLORADO
LOTS 25-JI. BLOCK 8. ROSE ADO<TIOtl TO ENGLEWOOD. COLORAD O
PROJECT BACKGROUND
THIS PROJECT IS COMPRISED or 2 PARCELS (PARCEL 10 #l971 •J4R4 ~029
AND PARCEL ID 11971-J4-4•017t TOTAUNC 21.875 50l/AR[ rEET.
~r~~1~"~s"W;Jc{l."~1 ~rf&.~D r:r5~~~lH~~~E~o~~il\t~
~ tgg:\'i:J~~~~t~Dtl~~o~ t~~~E o-:"Ep~~~l~ l~mt~~CEL
CONTAINS TH[ 8UILDINC (OflU[RLY HOUSING THE [NCl.E'll'OOO SHRINE CLUB.
6,750 SOUAR[ rECT. !MAI ... LL BE CONIIERTED INIO A IWO·UNIT RESIIJCIICE
!HE CURRENT ZONING or PARCEL 01 tS RIC PARCEL 02 CONIA!NS A
SINGLE rAUILY HOU[. IISO SOVARE rcn. ANO A TWO (2) CAR GARACE.
400 SOVARE rEET. -..!H AN oPTIOtl TO R[UOO[L. [>PANO. OR REBVILO
~b1~~!._ t~G~'f~~ /~~c0s o_,::r:;•:t!~ gfr~c~~g TW /?/ CAR
OR lHREE (J) CAR GARAGES. -..!H All oPTION rOR DETACHED ACCESSORY
smvclURES ABo...: .... LL BE BUil T ON THE NEW PUO STE PARCEL 01
ANO 02 WILL BE RECONnGuREO INTO nvc (5) LOTS· I . 2. J. 4 AtlO 5
THE PI.ANtlEO UNIT OEVCLoPIAENT -.,LL BE PROCESSED PURSUAtH TO TH[
•PPUCABLE CITY REGULA !IONS
CONSTRUCT ON / PHASING PLAN
!HE CON\'ERSIOII or !HE BUILOltlC FORUERL Y HOUSltlG THE ENGLEWOOD
SHRIii[ CLUB INTD A TWO•UtllT R[S'l)[NCE, CONSfflUCTION or THE TWO 12
N(W SINGLE rAU!LY HOMES. ANO POSSIBLE R[MOOEL, [>PANS,ON OR
REBUIU> o r THE [>ISTING SINGLE rAUILY HOO,I[ ... LL TAK[
APPROXIIIATELY NIN[ (9) MONTHS ArTER CONSTRVCTION B[GI NS.
PUD DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
TME APPUCANI PRCIPOSCS TO 0[\IELoP A TWO•UtllT RESIDEl"E II♦ THE 8U!U>1NG
rORMERLY HOUSINC THE ENGLEWOOO SHRINE CLUB •ND TWO (2] SIIIGLE r AMIL y
HOMES ON PARCEL 01 •ND PARCEL 02 PARKING rOR THE TWO-UNIT RESIDENC[
ANO TWO (2) NEW SINW rAIAILY HOUES ... LL CONSIST or A TWO 121 OR THREE
(J) CAR GARACE ON TIit REAR or THE LOT -..TH ONE (I) ADO TIONAL
oPEN PARKING SPAC[ rOR EACH DETACHED ACCESSORY STIWCTURE A81M
THE GARAG[ LANDSCAPING W!U BC INCORPORAlEO INTO TH( SITE O[Sl:iN
THIS PUO CONrORMS ... TH THE CITY or ENGLEWOOD'S COIAPR[H[N5'11[
Pl.AN BY orr£R!NC A BALANCED t,1tx or HOUSltlC oPPORIUNITIES SER\/IIIC
TH( N[[OS or CURRENT ANO ruTURt [NCLEWOOO C I IZENS BY IMPROWIC
THE OUAltTY Of' TH[ Cl TY'S EXISTING HOllSING STOCK. AUD BY AOORESSING
THE CURRENT SHORTAC[ or HOUSINJ: PRICED AT THE HIGH •END or TME
HOUSINC MARKET IN TH[ CITY or ENGL[WOOO
TH( DESIGN or TH[ N[W R[SIO(Nl'AL HOU[S AIIO THE TWO-UNIT RESIDWt C
-.,LL BE COUPATISLE AND CONSISTEtH -..TH THE CHARAlTER or TH[
EXISTING tlEIGHBOflHOOO BY lttCLU01ttC rROIH PORCHES GARAGES LOCA TEO
IU THE R(AR, ANO WAU<-A6l[ PEDESTRIAN WAYS. BY INCOAPORAnuc;. TH(
8UILOINC rORM[RL Y OCCUPl[O BY THC [NCLEWOOD SHRINE CLUB uto TH[
DEVCLoPM[tH PROJECT. COl,IMUN TY IDENTITY -.,LL 8[ REINFORCED
PUD P LAN NOTES
I TMIS tt[W PRoPERTY DOES UOT U[ WITHIN THE 100-YEAR
rLOOOPLAtrt
N[W unu11cs SHALL 8£ UNO[RCROUIIO
ALL COtlCR[T[ WORK DOIi[ tN THE PUBLIC R•GHT or w•Y S>IALL
BE ltj CQNrORMAttCE ... TH co,,smucno,, STANDARDS AND
COIi CRETE SP[ClrlCA TIOIIS rQR THE CITY or ENCLEWOOC>.
COLORADO.
4 THE OtllELoPER SHALL COl,IPL Y -., TH ALL APPLICABLE CITY
CODES. REGULATIONS. ANO STAUOAROS
5. IN THE [\'ENT or A CONrLtCT B[Tv.t:[N TM[ SPEOrlC PR0'1Sl0NS
or THIS PUO ANO TITLE 16. TH[ SPEOrlC PROVISIOIIS or THIS
PUO SHALL CONTROL
3299 S . LOGAN STREET RESIDENCES
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT TEAM
OWNER
T08Y T[RHUtl[
SHADOW CR[[K HOU[$, LLC
P o. eo, JS0909
v.t:STUUISTER. CO 80031
PH (J03) 635-0830
FA>; (JDJ) 635-0968
,1.RCHITECT·
ANc;i[ ACUIL£fU .• A.IA
EDGE ARCHITECTVRE
PO BO• 271874
FORT COi.WiS. CQ 80527
PH (970) 377-4217
SHEET INDEX
01 COIIER SHEET
0 2 DISTRICl PLAN
OJ E>ISTINC 51 T£ PLAII
04 PROPOSED SIT£ PLAN
i
05 GRADING ANO 0RAIHAGE PLAU
06 UTILITY PLAN
0 7 LANOSCAPINC PLAN
08 CONt(PIUAL REIIOERING
09 CONCEPTUAl REtlO[RINC
:;; ,--, ,........, .. ,--,...--.,
i
DE\'ELOP[R
TOBY TERHUNE
SHADOW CR[(K HOU(S, LLt
P 0. BOX 350909
,otsn,1t1STE11. CO 80031
PH , (JOJ) 63~-0BJO r ... x (JQJ) 635-0968
CIVIL [NCUIE[R
UICtiAEL BRAKE. PE PLS
JR [NCINE[Rll•C
2900 COI.LEC[ All[ SUITE .lO
FORT COi.LUiS. CO B052~
PH (303) 267-6231
i
"'
ARE• MAP -NOT TO SCALE
lANOSt APE ARCHlT[CT
PAUL SHOllKAS. RLA
PCS GROUP, IIIC
JOI KALAMATII , UWT 102
D[NIIER. co eonJ
PH (3031 531-4905
ALTA SURVEYS ATT.-.CHCO ArT(R PAC[ 09
N
APPROVED CERTIF ICATES
APPROVED FOR fflE OW/VER ANO (JEVELOPl71
SHADOW CREEK HOU[S. LLC
ST•TE or COLORADO j
COUNTY or ARAP AHOE SS
THE FORECOtNG INSTl>VU[NT WAS ACKNO-.,,EOGEO BErORE 1,tE !HIS ___ _ D•Y or ______ . 2o_BY _______ _
"°TN[SS U Y HANO ANO $(AL
MY COMIAISSION (>PIRES:
APPROVED FOR 111£ CITI' OF ENGLEWOOD
NOTARY PUBLIC
PLAtl~C ANO ZON ING COMUISSION CHAIRP{R$0N
PLANNIN C ANO ZOf.l lNC COMMISSION RECOROtNC SECF![UAY
li!IIA YOR or ENCLEWOOO
ATTESTED
OAT[
DUE
DATE
THE fORECOlt4C INSTRUU[tH WAS ACt<:NOv.tEOCCO BErORE ME THI S
__ OAY or AD 2o __ BY ___________ _
AS _____ or _________________ _
cnv Cl.ERK
CU:/U,; AND RECORDS CERT/FICA TION
THIS PLAttNED UNI T OE\'ELoPMENT IS ACCEPTED FOR n u NC Ill TH[ orncc
or THE CLERK ANO RECORDER or ARAPAHOE COONTY,
STATE or COLORADO. AT __ D'CLOO< -u.
ON TIIIS __ DAY or ____ ~AO . 20_.
R[CEPTIQN HO ___ , BOOK NO ___ • P,IG[ NO(S) ______ _
V·
ClERK AND RECORDER
DEPUTY
Exhibit A
• • •
C, z
I
I
f
i
~ I ~ I ~
... c
'
tii w a:
I-
C/)
z < en ~ w 0 (.)
...IZ
•W
Cl) C
en -en cn
C\I w
M a:
ti§ Ji-a, t ~ t
::lj :;l
S!d
~~ J ~~-
ll ,.l,' UL .. ]~!
!z w lg
9~ ~g
WO Cu I: . z O
::J 8 fil 3: zw z ..J :s fl! Q. w
COVER
SHEET
SHEET 01 of 09
•
•
ARCHI TECTUR AL CH ARACTER
THE ARCHIT(C !URAL CH.RACT(R or THIS DE\/1:LOPMrnT SHAU. BE URBAtl
IN CHARACTER AHO ""Ll PROVIDE roR A P(Dt S TR tAN $CAI,( ALONC THE
SlREEI LE \/1:L. DESICN SHAU I NCLUDE THE fDLlO .. tlC:
I A IIINtllUII or TWO (2) 04ITTRENT u• T(Rt•L P A TTERNS AN D COi.OR
CHANCES SHAU. Bt INCORPOR ATED IN TO EACH F ACADE (All SIDES)
Of r>,E B UILDtNC DEStCN.
2. THE FRONT FACADE ON NEW SINCLE F AIIIL Y HOM ES SHAU. MAIi{ A
MIN. OF 30:t MASONRY OR A DtnNED F"l!OHT P ORCH THAT E•TEN DS
T>,£ ENTIRE WIDTH Of THE FRONT ELEVA TICH
J . STUCCO. S TONE , CMU, BRtCK. CEMt NTillOUS (INCLUDINC J AMES
HAR01t & SIMIL AR). ANO METAL SIOt NC ARC PERM1 SS18LE 8 UtLDtN C
MAltRtALS
4 . PREDDUINANT ENTRIES SHALL 8E Cl£ARL Y DtrtN [D ANO MAY CONSIST
or ELEMEN TS SUCH AS: C ANOPtES, 0\/{RHANCS. PEAKED ROOFS. OR
ARCHES
~-Roers SHAU BE A llltllUUM o r J 12 EXISTIN C fLAT R OOFS ARE
ALLOWED TO REUAIN ANO FLAT ROOF$ ARC ALLOWED O N PORCHES.
SUBUIITtD AS PART o r TH E PROPOSED PUO AR E CONCEPTUAL
RE NO[RINCS tNOIC A TtNC THE CE NERAL LE'IEL or OESI CN OIJ AUTY. ~a~s,,t~P ;:.AET(:t~~~n~
0
D~t;;:~tRftf..~A'ff
1
~N~!J~~~E~b ~f E
t NCORPORAltO tN THE TWO-UNIT RESIDENct ANO SINCLE FAMILY HOMES
WILL NOi BE f\lLLY OE TERU•NEO Utlllt. OEIAILEO AR CH T(CTURAL ORAV,ON CS
HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED
ANY DE-.CL OPIIEN T SHALL INCORPOR A TE THE AfOREIIENTIONEO
ftATURE S TO CREAlt: AE STHEllCALll' PLEASINC 8UIL0tNCS TH AT HA-.C
S TRONC ARCHITECTURAL O<ARACltR WI TH Ht CH OIJ AU TY Fl NISHES.
RELATIONSH P TO THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD'S
UNIFIED DEVELOP MENT CODE
THE 3299 $. LOC AN SlREET RESIDENCES WILL G(N(RAU.Y COMPLY ..,TH
THE DE-.CLOPUENI ANO OCSI C>l S TANO AA OS SET FOA TH tN THE
OEVE LoPMENI COO£ or THE CITY or ENGLEWOOD TH E PROPOSED
OE-.CLDPU[NT WILL MEET OR El<CEEO OU AU TY STANOAAOS ANO LEVEL S
Of DESIGN WITH R[ASONA8lE ZONING VARI AN CES TH AT WOULD NOi 8[
POSSIBLE UNDER A STANOAAO ZON E DISTRICT
THE APPRO-.C O PUO AEZ ONIHC SH ALL NOi L APSE. BUT $HALL R[UAIN IN
£ffECI UN TIL SU PERSEDED 8Y A SUBSEQUEN T REVISION Of THE PUO
DOCUMENT THE FDLlO..,NC MOOtrtCAIION PROCEDURES AA[ CONSISTEtH
v,oTH THE PUD uoo,nc•nON PROCEDURES or THE CITY or ENGLEWOOO
TITLE 16. ZONINC RECULAltONS AS LISTED IN THE UOOIFtCA TION ANO
AMENDMENT or TH[ PUO SECTION BELOW.
SHOULD ANY PAR I or THESE RECULA TIONS ANO STIPULATIONS BE
DECLARED INVAUO OR UNENrORCEABLE BY A COURT OR COUP£1ENT
JUR1SDtCllON. SUCH OEOSION SHALL NOT •rrECT THE VALIDITY 0,
tNrORCEUENI or THE R[l.tAtNtNG PRO'-ISIONS or THESE REGULATIONS.
RELATIONSHIP OF THE PUD TO THE PUD
SITE PLAN
THE PROVISl0NS or THIS PUO ""LL [STABUSH ZONE DISTRICT STANDARDS
WHOSE DETAILS or DEIIELOPMENT IIILL BE OELINCATtD IN THE PUO SIT(
PLAN
MODIFICATION AND AMENDMENT OF THE PUD
ANY FUTURE OE\/1:LOPU[NT ON LOTS I. 2. J. 4, ANO S SHALL COUPL Y
v,oTH THtS PUO AND OtSTRICT OEVELOPIIENT PLAN.
DISTRICT PLAN -THE TERMS. CONDI TlONS. THE ADOPltD PUO 01sm,cT
PLAN AND OOCWENTS t,IAY BE CHANCED At10/0R AUE!<OCO IN WHOI.(
OR IN PART AS fOLLOWc
I UtNOR UOOtFtCA TIONS 10 THE PUO DtSlRtCT PLAN· THE CtlY
MAN ACER OR Ht$ DESlCNEC UA Y APPROVE MINOR UOOtFICA TIONS
IN THE L0CA TI0N. SIZtNC. ANO l<EtCHT or 51RUCTUR£S OR
FACIUTIES tr R(QU1RED BY ENCtNEERtNC OR OTHER CtRCUMSTANCES
NOi FOR£SEEN AT THE TIU[ or THE PUO 01sm1c1 PLAN WAS
WAS APPRO'IED MINOR .. oo,nCATIONS SHALL NOT BE PERMlmD
tr THE UCOlrtCAllON RESULTS tN ANY or THE CIRCUMSUNCES
USTEO BELOW tN THIS PUO
2. MAJOR MOOIFICAIIONS TO THE PUO OtSTR1CI PLAN. MAJOR
UOO,rtCATIOHS UAY BE MADE 10 THC APPROVED PUD DISlRtCI
PLAN PURSUANT 10 THE SAU[ UUITATIONS ANO REOUtR[U[NTS BY
WHtOI SUCH PLANS ANO OOCUUENIS WERE ORIGttlALLY APPR0\/1:0.
3299 S. LOGAN STREET RESIDENCES
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
MODIFIC A TION AND AM END MENT OF THE PUD
(CONT.)
SIT( PLAN
I ,.,NOR MOOIFlC A TIONS TO THE PUO SITE PLAN· THE Ct lV, THROUGH
THE OE-.CLOPMEN T REVI EW T(AU. UAV AUTHORIZE MINOR DE VIATIONS
FROM THE PUO Silt PLAN ""1EN SUCH DEI.IATIONS APP EAR
NE CESSAR Y IN UCHT Of ltCHNtCAL OR [NC/NEERING
CON St DER A TIONS. UtNOR OEVIA TtOtlS $HALL NOT BE P[RUIITtO If
ANY or THE FOLLOWIN G OACUUSIANC[S RESULT
1 I A CHANCE IN THE CHARACltR Of THE OtVEL DPM(NT; OR
I 2. A CHANCE IN THE PERu,mo L ANO U SES: OR
U. AN ltlCR EASE IN TH E MAXIU UU H[tCH I Of ANY BUtLDtNC
or UOAE l HAN 5i. O A
t 4. AN tNCR tASE IN TH E NUUBER or OWEWNG UNITS, OR tN
TH E RA 110 Of THE CROSS fLOOR AR(A Of SlRUCTURtS 10
THE LANO ARCA. OR tPi CRtA SES •N THE PROP OSED CROSS
FLOOR AREA IIITHtN AN Y PARTICULAR LANO USE o r MORE
THAN 2!1;; 0A
I 5. A RCOUCTION IN THE SETB ACK S FROM PROPERTY LINES UORE
THAN I D>:; OR
I 6 AN IN CREASE or MORE TH AN ,o x IN CROUNO COVERACE BY
STRUCTURES OR SURFACE PAR1'1NC; OR
I 7 A REDUCTION BY U OR( TH AN ~1' I N THE LANO AREA
O[StCNAllON r OR L AN DSCAPING. OR
, B. A REDUCTION tN THE RATIO or orr-SlREET PARKINC AHO
LOAD ING SPACE TO CROSS FLOOR AREA OR NUMBER or
OWEW N C UNITS.
2 SIT( PLAN AME!<OU(NTS NOT UEEIINC THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS:
ALL PUO Silt PLANS APPRO-.CO AND RECMDED t,IAY ONLY BE
AUENDEO P UR SU AN T TO THE SAU[ PROCEDURE ANO SUBJECT 10
lNE SAU[ U UITATION AtlO REOUt AEUEN TS BY WHICH SUCH PL AN S
WERE APPR0 \/1:D
PUO DISTRICT DEVELOPMEN T STANDARDS
EXISTINC PARCELS 0 1 ANO 0 2 , TO TAU NC 2 1 8 75 SQUARE rtEI. ARC
B[INC RE CON~CUREO IN TO FIVE (S) LOIS 1. 2. J. 4. AND S AS SHOWN
ON THE PROPOSED Silt PLAN . (R[fERENCE PROJECT 8AC~CROUND,
SHEET I) LOTS I . 2 ANO J "'LL B E SINCLE rAUILY HOMES ANO LOTS •
AHO 5 ""LL BE A TWO~UNII RESIDENCE THERE IS AN OPTION FOR A
OEIACHEO A CC ESSORY STRUCTURE ON LOTS 2, J. ANO 4 .
1 C[N (RAL RECULAllONS: UNLESS OTHER'MSE PRQ\110[0 FOR IN THtS
PUO OR SUBSEOU[tlT AU[NQt,1ENTS. THE PROI.ISl0NS. STANDARDS,
RECULA TIONS. AND PROCEDURES PER ONEN T 10 AN APPU CA TION
FOR THE OEIIELOPUENT or LANO WITHIN THIS Puo ZONE OtSlRtCI
COUPLIES WITH THE RIC ZONE 01$1RtCT or THE CI TY or
ENCLEWOOO EXCEPT FOR lltMS NOTEO IN THE FDLlO .. NC SECTIONS
2 MINIMUM SETBACKS FOR PRtNCtPLE STRUCTURES
LOI I LOTS2&3 LOTS 4 & S
FRONT 15· 10 PORCH 15• TO PORCH 8' TO PORCH
SIDE
REAR
20' TO HOUSE 16' 10 BUILDING
NORTH 2 J' J' NORTH 10"
SOUTH J" SOUTH 0·
45· TO HOUSE 45• TO HOUSE 50" 10 BUtt..DINC
l . LOf 1 HAS AN [XISTINC HOUSE INI TI-'-LLY. Tt41S HOUSE WILL
REUAIN, aur 1r A N[W SINCl[ r.t-ll,IILY HOt-,[ IS BUILT ON
THIS LOT, IT MUSI COUPLY WITH THC SETBACKS rOR LOIS
2 AND J USTED ABO\/E
2 . LOTS 2 ANO J COt,IPLY WITH ZONE 01S1RICT RIC, ON(-UNtl
DWELLING ON A SU ALL LOI ( •.~1)(1 $0. rt ). ON THE REAR
AHO soot SClBACKS, THE FRONT SE18AC~ OIITTRS. THE
OPTIONAL J-CAR CARACE ""LL HAVE A I" SETBACK ON THE
NORTH SIDE
3 LOTS 4 AND 5 HAY( AN [XlSTINC: BUILOlliC fHAT WL.L INITIAU.Y
R[IIAtN ANO BE CONVERTED INTO A TWO-UNI T RESIDENCE
J. MA• BUILDING H[IGtllS FOR PRINCIPLE STRUCTURES
4 UINIUUU SETBACKS FOR REAR GARACCS & DETACHED ACC ESSORY
SIRUC TURES
L OT I LOIS 2. J. & • LOI 5
SIDE NORTH 2 .J' J-CAR CARAC[ J"
SOUTH J' NORtH i '
SOUlN g·
R(AR 5 .9" s· 6'
S. MAX BU1U)INC HEtCH T FOR REAR CAR AGE S & OCIACHEO ACCESSOllY
S lRU CTURES I LOI l
16'
I LOIS 2 . J. & • 1 LOI $
16
PUD DISTR ICT DE VELOPMENT STANDARDS
(CONT ,)
6 UIN LOT AREA (SO. FT )
I ILOT 1 I LOTS 2 & 3 I LOIS 4 & 5 I
I MIN LOT AR EA 14,000
l1so. FT 1 1
•• 500
1
J.500 I
I
I . LOTS 1•5 TOTAL 21.&75 SQUARE fEEl. (0.50 ACRES).
2. LOTS 2 AHO J COUPLY v,oTH ZONE 04STRICT RIC, ONE •UNIT
DWELLING ON A SUALL LOT (4.500 SO . rT)
7 MAX LOT COVERACE (ll)
I L OT I I LOTS 2 & J I LOTS 4 & 5
160X
t LOT COVERAGE INQ.UOES C0'1ERED PORCHES. CARAGES. ANO
PORTIONS Of ORIVEWAl'S ""O[R THAN 12"
2 LOT J HAS AN [)USTINC MOUSE:. IF' A N[W SINCl[ rAUILY
HO ME tS BUILT ON THI$ LOI. II MAY NOi E•CEEO 601'
LOT C0\/1:RAGE.
J LOTS 4 ANO S HAVE AN E>ISTING 8UILD1tlC THAT ""LL REMAIN
IF A NEW STRUCTUR E IS BUil T ON THESE LOIS II MAY NOT
E.CEED 601' LOI C0\/1:RACE.
8 BULK PLAN E
I
I
I LO T I HAS AN Ext STIN C HOUSE ANO CARAG[ THAT Q,O NOT MEET
CURRENT B ULK PLANE S TANOAROS. AN Y NEW CONSTRUCTION
SHALL MEET THE BULK P LAN( QIACRAU ON SHEET 3
2 . LOTS 2 ANO J SHALL IIEEl THE BULK P1.ANE ON SHEET J.
J. L OTS 4 ANO $ H AVE AN EXISllNC BUILDtN~ AHO ODES NOi MEET
CURR(,_.T BULK P1.ANE STANDARDS ANY tl[W C<IN STRUC TlON
$HALL MEET THE BULK PLAN[ 0.ACRAU ON SHEET J.
9 PARKtNC
PARKINC rOR LOIS 1•S SHALL U EEI PARKINC REQUtREUENIS
AS SPtcmco PER CCIV or ENCU:WOOO UNIFl[O OEvtLoPUO-,T CODE
S£CnON I&--•-•• TA8l.£ 16-.t-, 1
1 LOTS I . 2. ANO J SHALL HA\/{ A UI NIUUU Of 2 $PACES PER
SINCLE fAMILY O[IACH[D OWEWNC ~NIT
2. LOTS • ANO $ SHALL HAVE A UINIUUU o r 2 SPACES PER
TWO-UNIT REStOENCE.
3. LOTS 2, J, -'-"'0 .a SHALL HAVE: A MIN1WVM Of' I SPA.Ct PER
DCTACHEO ACCESSORY SlRUClURE
tO. SICNACE
SICNACE. SHALL COUPL y Will-I n-it CITY or ENClCWOOO UNlntD
OE-.tloPUENI COOC
11 ftNCNC
FENONC SHALL COMPLY V,OTH THE CITY O F [NGlEWOOl) UNIFI(~
OE-.CLOPIIENI COO£
12 LANOSCAl'tNG ANO SCRE[NltlC
LANOSCAPINC ANO SCRE[NtNC SHALL COMPLY .., TH THE CITY Of
ENCLEWOOO UN1r1to DE\/1:LDPUENI CODE S[CllON 16-6-7
I REfERENct PUO LANDSCAPING PLAN. SH[Ef 01
2 lOIS I•$ $HALL COMPLY 'Mll-+ TABLE 16 -6-7 J.
CITY o r ENGLEWOOO UNtrt£0 OE\/1:LOPU[tlT COO(
IJ OETACH[O ASSESSORY SIRUCTURE
1 THE DETACHED AC CESSORY STRUCTURE SHALL HAvt A SE PARA T(,
OUTSIO[ ENlRANCE.
2 THE EXTERIOR MATERIALS ANO COi.ORS Ot' THE DETACHED
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SHALL COUPLIMCNT TH£ 0-.CRALL
CHARACrtR or THE PRtNCtPAL OWELUNG
J. PROPERTY O~ERS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTINUING CAR £
ANO UAINltNANCE Qt' TH[ DE TACHED ACCESSORY S lRUCTUAC
•· PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO THE OEIACHEO ACCESSORY STRUCTURE/
R(AR GARAGE SMALL ec PROVIO[O FRO• THE PUBLIC S•OEWALK
THROUGH EACH LOI (WITHOUT REOUIRINC PEOCSIRtAHS At10
GUESTS TO USE ALL[ Y)
1, UGMT11iC
E•TE RI OR UCHTING SHALL BE DOWNCAST, n,,u COT err LAMP S.
ALLOWE D USES
R[Slp£NTI AL US[S
I GROUP LIVING
HOUSEHOLD UVINC
CROUP LIVIN G FACILITY. SMALL
ONE-UNI T OWELUN C ON SUALL LOT
ONE-UNIT DWELUNC
UULTI -Utll l OWELLING
OCTACHED ACCESSORY SlRUCTURE
PtRutmO
PCl!UtlTtO
PERMtlTtD
P[l!MtffiD
P[R MtTltD
PU8LtC/INS llTUllON AL USES (MIN . 24.000 SI o r LOT AREA R[OUIRED)
I GOVERNU[NI AND O TY
AHY Oll-l(s:t BUIL DIN GS ANO
~~r '/.Bfi~,cN?,J s~~'i\'d,;~Lu ~g {;
CAIACORY
2. PA RKS ANO OPEN SPACE
ATHLETIC FIELD
COUMUNIIY CARDEN
PARo<
J. RELtCIOUS ASSEMSLIES
REUCIOUS 1NSTITU10NS AND
ACCC SSOR•ES
4 . SCH OOL
EOUCA TlON 1NSTI TU l10N
S T(LECOMUUNICA TION FA CILITY
ALTERNATIVE TO WER STR UCTURE
AN TENNA
TOWER SlRUCTURE
6. UTIUTY f ACtUTY
MINO R UTIU TY f AOAJ TY
PERMt ffiO
CON OIIIONAI.
CON DITIONAL
P[RUITT[O
PtRu1mo
PERUI ITtO
P[RMI ITtD
PtRu1m o
COliOITIONAL
CONDITI ONAL
couu£RC,AL USES (MIN 24,000 Sf or LOI AREA R[QUIRCO)
I DEPENDENT CARE
•CC[SSQRY USES
DEPENDENT C'ARE. LESS THAN
2.t HCIJRS
AS USTEO IN [NCLEWOOO MUNICIPAL COOE llllE t 6 -UNIFlED
0 [\/1:LOPUENT COOC
f[MPQRAA Y USES
AS USIEO IN ENCLEWOOO MUNICIPAL coot TITt.E 16 -UNtFl(O
DE vtLOPUENl c oot .
ALLOWED USES (CON T.)
DC "-Ct-i[Q "CC[SSQRY STRyCT\JR[ USES
THE D ETACHED ACCESSOR Y SlRUCTURE ABOVE TH E GARAGE S ON L OIS
2-4 SHALL 8[ ttMITEO TO 400 Sf" OF' IN ttRt~ SP ACE ~Tt4 TH[ OPRON
TO ADO AN [XltRtOR PATlO O'ICR TH E CARACE.
1. HOME OCCYPATI Ott "OM[ OCCVPAnONS CU STOM ARlt. Y tNC•DENTAL JO
THC PR1NC1PAl USE AS A RESIOEt<CE MAY BE ALLOWED WH EN
CONOUCTEO IN THE PRIM ARY D WE LLtN C UNIT ANO/OR I N THE DE1Aet<CD
ACCE SSORY STRUCTURE , PROVIDED TH( r OLLOIIINC STAtlDARD S AR(
MEI :
A. ONL Y lWO (2) TOTAL HOME OCCUP ATIONS $HAL\ 8£ P[Rl ,11 m o
V,OfHIN EACH PROPER TY o r LOIS 2 -• (ONE UUIUUU IN T>,£
l:'RII.IAfl:Y O~WNG UNI T AND ONE'. MAXIM\J U IN Tl-t( OETACM(D
ACCESSORY SlRUCTIJRE )
8. ONLY ONE (1) HOU( OCCUP ATION SH ALL BE ALLOWED ON ~Q-T I
ANO LO T $.
C. THE HOU[ OCCVPATION(St SHALL BE OPERATED ENTIRE LY I ND OOR
ANt ONli.,Y BY h-l C PCASON OR PER SO NS lil.A.1tH•1N INC A Dv.ELLINC
UNII ON THC PROPER TY.
0. ALL PR0-,1!0NS Of TIit.£ 16 SECTI ON 16-5••-C. I A$ AU[NO[O
SHALL APPLY TO HOU[ OCCUPA n ONS UNLESS OTHER .. SE MODlrlCO
BY THIS PUO
2 . ~lll.£alIS-A OWEWNC UNIT !HAI IS CONTAIN(O WI THIN
TH£ OETACH(D ACCESSORY SlRUCTURE SHALL BE ALLOWED
PROVI OEO THE r OU.OWINC STANDARDS ARE MET· S.Ji.'t~ic ot~.i'b. 51grs0 :.Rt 5~~1,C .SHALL BE PERu,mo PER
8 THE SECONDARY SUITE SHALL NOi H AVE SEPARATE OWNERSHIP
F"l!CII THE PRtNOPLE HOIIC ON THC LOI
C. THE SECONDARY s u ,,TE SHALL ABtOE BY AI.L 8 U IL01NC COO[
PROVISIONS
0 ONE ADDI TIONAL PARK IN C SPACE SM ALL BE PROVl0[0 IN
AO C.nON TO THC PARK NC REOU IR[UCNTS F~ S1NClE F AUil Y
DETACHED OWEL LtNC UNt I S AS SPECIFIED PER D IV or
[NCU:WOOO UNI FIED O[VE\OPUENI COO£ SEC TION 16-•-••
TAELE 16-4•4.I
R£QUIR£U£NIS·
A. THE OWNER MU ST RE SIDE ON THE PRQP[RTY IN EI TH ER TH [
MAIN RESIDtl-lCC OR THC SECON DARY SUITE.
8. stCONOARY SUI TES SH ALL NOT B E 5\/BDtVIDEO OR FREE TO
EXtST ON TH EtR 0~
C . SECONDARY SUlltS SHALL BE IN l[NOEO AS A RENTAL UNI T
OR A S AN INOE PENO(NI OP TION FOR F AUILY MEMBERS.
0. SECONDARY SUITES SH ALL e t FOR rlXEO RESIO[NCC. NOT A
TOURIST ACCOUOO A TlON
E SEC0NOARY SUI TES SHALL H AVE ONE OR MORE HABITABLE
RDOUS. BU T NO i UOAC THAN TWO BEDROOMS ANO ONE COOKtNC
,AOUTY. FOR TH E RESIDEN TIAL ACCOUOOATlON or ONE OR
MORE IND VIOUALS WHO ARE RCL A ltO THROUCH MAR RIACE OR
COIIMON LAW. 8 L D00 RE LA llQNSHtP. LECAL ADOPTION. OR LECAL
CUAROIANSHtP; OR A CROU P Of NOT MOR[ TH AN TWO
UNRELA TED P(RSONS.
J El U !RI [ SPAC:f · 'SPACt IN ~£ OETA CM[Q ACCESSOR Y STRUCt\JA£
SHALL BE ALLOWED PROVID ED TH E fOLLO..,NG STANDARDS ARE
MET
A. THE rt(XI BLE u .. NG SPACE u u s T AB•DE B Y A LL BUILDING
CO~E PROVISI ONS.
EXAMPLES or fLEXIBLE Lt\llNG $PACE INCLUDE (BY THE WAY or
EXAMPLE, BU I NOi LIMITED TO)·
A. CR Afl OR HOBBY ROOU
8 (NTERTAINll[NT SP ACE, SUCH AS A H O"t THEATER
C. HOM [ GYM
o •RT sTUoco
f ~.i~c~~~o~OOM
C HOU( SCHOOLING ROOII
H, ADDITON AL S I ORACE SPACE
DETACHED ACCESSQftY sm,tc:n,sr HA.81 I ABl1 ITYff'NISHARU ,n:·
BUtLllrNC PERMITS ANO INSPEC TIONS AR[ REQUIRED TO FlNISH AN Y
N0,1~HABt lABLE SPACE IN TO H A811A8L£ SPACE BUILOt NC coots ARE
PER;(lf!ICALLY REVISED ANO NON-HABITABLE SPACE TH AT MAY BE
flNISHEO OR CON 'IERltO 10 HABtlABLE $PACE UNOtR CURREN T
BUtLOll<C COD ES MAY ND I BE ALLOWED TO BE CONVER TtD OR rlNtSH[O
UNDER coot REVISIONS AOOP ltO IN THE fUTUR(
I!! l!i
:J •
i !
•
■
~ w cc
~
I!! I!!
J!i l!i . .
! !
I
f
i
z < Cl)
(!)W
00 _, z
Cl)• w
C
0) u5 81 w (") cc
I!! I!! I!! ~ ! !
I ! !
I ~
;t
~ ~
. ::
•I u ;
~J~ ~ ... i,
C. f ' .. ,
DISIBICT
PLAN
SHEET 02 of 09
e;
z z
Ci)
CD
0
C z g
<
_....:w---z
~ ~ ffi ~ ~ = C z: c.> z: CJ a en ~ iil
3299 S. LOGAN STREET
RESIDENCES
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
ENGLEWOOD.COLORADO
•
\
\
\
'\ :# -PIIII \ .,
--,, "" ..-1'."1 _. a \ ~ 1,:z:
\ .. • · ~.~ I~~~ -lr·J .'2-· ~ ., i \,. __________ ----. ______ , -... J.
__ · . ,' -~ ij5~~~j
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
N ll-8 .·•· ·z ~·-~ ~
---------
;11 '~ N~Z
' -mZ G)
I : ~ .....
I ~Q
: ;p ~
t ta] z I> G)
I ·----'----
~---------.---· --.. ------
1 r
I
I . •. I
-... ' s GRANT STREET --I ~I ~t!!i}~~~~ ·,j
I "a6 lo\'-~~ i
S~smeET J >
~.r ■
SH.\l'f'-l' CRFFI>: Hn~,r_~
P.O. Box 350909
WESTMINSTER. CO 80031
Phone : 303-635--0830
Fax: 303-635-0968
ii
S PENNSVINMM sJN!ET
~ J·R ENGINEERING
A-~
Centmnd JOl -740-9393 C-5¢ff,'J'
719-59J-259J fat (dlr,!I 91!H 91-!Hl!II!
-•-rengn~1n; i;.;m,
••
g 1 i;roui:, ,nc • •• 11-e•1••.itn ce•
lrla~de<'IC•Mam 100116'"1i'l'Nt
IIJ 9-UM) [)enwe, COl!IIUU
!P""I lQJ !rill (905 lhl l0l !JI •9'CII
rii
)
i
SUBMITTAL
REVISl0H I t DATE:
~I/DATE:
fEVISION, 'DA.TE.
REVISION t / DATE:
~ I I DATE.
REVISl0HI/DATE:
-
m
X
en
-i -z
G)
en --i m
"'U r
)> z
-
• 3299 S. LOGAN STREET RESIDENCES
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
EXISTING
GARAGE
GARAGE W/
0 ACHED AC CESSORY
TRUC TURE AB OVE
PARKING SPACE
fOR OAS
1: PPOPOScO
PE:T WAL£ <,,
---------
N90'00'00•t: 125.00'
NEW HOUSE
'
EXI STING
TWO STORY
BR ICK BUILDING
REMODEL NTO
A TWO -UNIT RE SIDENCE
~h --
II
11
"" 11 -l Ii 11 k,;
1§ I' I
I
1
LO T 4
-~
'• ~
"' ,,._
2 -CAR
CARACE
I
I I 1, ~
I II ~
BUILDING [cl 1
1 ~
---~~~~~~-------_j~------e!!!!!!=O~VE~R~H~AN~C~::!....-~:-_J~·~; __ l ·
----------S90'00'00•w 125.00' /I /
CONC. WALK I ,, /
):5,-½~'..2>::--~~-------------------------------------------------~~~~ -
"' "'·
BLOCK 8
COOt EPTUAL BULK PLANE S'EC tON
LOTS 2 & 3, NTS
t.lA X HEfCH T
------1
======
LOTS 2&3
37 ~-WIOE LOIS
I
I
I
I
I
I IS
I ~ ~
I ~
I .,
10 5 0 ,o
CIRICINA~ SCAL.E • 1• • 1,r
------~---------------------------------------------------------------------NOTE: BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE
i
•
•
i
I
f
i
iJ ~ I ~ ~ ..
'
tu w a: t;
z < en
(!) w
OU ...JZ
•W en C
en -en u, NW
C') a:
II,
Ii '§.;;
!;
"' ;-; ... ~
h§ .... r ~~-1.J,'t :1:.-. ~ts
PROPOSED
SITE PLAN
SHEET 04 of 09
•
I ---: -r
I
7
I
_J
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
L_7
-r ·---
"-DOWN SPOVT
(TTP)
RET WALL
BUILDING
FF=IOOJ 90
TOF=1002 JO
N
f-
0
_j
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I _
I I 8 : ,, : -
I I §1
I -I
I I
I I
I I
I I
f ' I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
: "
3299 S. LOGAN STREET RESIDENCES
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
GRADING/EROSION CONTROL NOTES
S LOGAN ST
------~---·-
1001 1 GR 1002 O c.i;-......._,
BUILOINC
FF=IOOJ 90
TOFa1002 JO
GARAGE
\ f tr.•· ~ ... ).
ma ~ ·' 1 '. t98 ~ L~-~ ---c _.J_ __ _,_ L
'\...1000 0 CR 10000 ros 1000 o 1osJ
I
EXISTING BUILDING
ff•99 8 4:1:
I LANDSCAPE PA\tRS
(TTP)
,:;t
f-
0
_j
' '\.... OEEPWO
FNO WAU.
gg 1 ro-s
l()
f-
0 _,
L -
~
I
I
I
I
997 $ CR
.,.,-0971 10\'
/ 9911 ros---..
-------EX H AN OtCAP RAU P r
l"'l 9
J
§;
I 11
I It
I II
I II ~
%(<5-0(WAL~
11 I
" I
I J ~ V' I
1 '1 I
~
"'C
e
THt E~DSIOH (:OHtFIOI. IN'SP(ClOR l.fUST et NOnnc:o .. , \£AST TW{t,lfv-rooR (14) HOURS PRIOR TO All'I' CONSTRVCT\Cf,I ()ti ~,s Sir£.
~[~[ SHAU. SE NO £.t.AT)4-01STUABINC ACTI'ol!TY OUTSIDC Tl-4[ uu,rs DESD.14T'EO ON ~E ACCEPTED PLAhS
All R(OUIR[D PCfllMEltR SLT ANO CONSfflucnoN rtUONC SHAU. BE INSU,1.LED Pf'~ ro AtiT I.ANO O~TU~BINC .t.CnVIT'I'
(STOCtcPILJHC. SffllPPINC. CIU.t)INC, ETC) .AU OTHER REQUIRED CPOSION c0tm~01. MCASURES SHAU. B[ INST.tu.ED AT THC
APPROPRIATE TlME IN M CON'STPUCTION SCOUOICE AS IJ"OICartt) IN Tl1E APPAO'ltt> PAO,.(Ct $CN(WL( CON'SfflUCTION
Pl,.AtlS, ANO EflOSION COHTROl REPCf'T
AJ AU. D,!ES OVRINC CONSTRVCTION, Tt4E. OE\l[LOPCR SHAU BC RESPOHSISI.£ rOR PR[VENTINC At1t) CC:tH'fiOWNC 00-SITt
tAO'St:ON IIICUIOINC l':(EPINC Tk( PROP(.RT't' S\JfTICJ(Nl\. 't WA T[R{l) SO AS TO MINlMCZ[ 'MHO BLOVIN SEDIMENT THC
0E--UOPCR $MAU ALSO er AE?Ot-4'S1Bt£ F'OA ltlSlJ.WkC ANO l,fAINTAtNtNC AU. EAOS.:Otl CONTROi.. F'AC1U Tits ~O'Mf HERON
PAE•01STVA8ANCE \(C(tATION SHAU. et PROTECTED ANO RETAINED WH[F['v'[R POSSIBL[ A[.MOVAJ. OR 0-STVRBANCE or
(xtSnNC \ltc.tTAOl)NI $H.AU. fl[ UMl t'[D TO n-+t AR(A(5) RCOORED FOR tMM[DfAT[ CON5TRUCTION OPER,t,TlOtlS. llND rOR l'Ht
SHORrtST PRACTICAL P(RIOO ~ TWE
6. AU. so~s CIIPOSED DVRlNC ~AND DtST\JRBINC AC.11\1Tr (STRIPPINC, G,R,,t.OINO, Ul'Llh INSt"'-L.AllONS. stOCt<PIUNG. rUING.
[TC} SI-IA.LL BE k[PT lt,I A ROUGHENED CONOlnQN Br RlPPlHC OR DISklNG ALONG LAND CONTOURS UN TIL M\lt.CH.
\1'£<;£TA.1'10N. o" OtMO. PCl'tJatttl'lt UIOSIOJ'I C:O,..TROL 9'-"PS AA[ IJ'ISTAl.LEO. NO sens IN AREAS OUTSIOE PRO.CCT STRE[T
A:ICHTS-or ......... SH.All R[MA.IN ExPO'SEO BY UNO Dl~TVA8tNC Atm,,rr FOR MOPE lH.u.1 TH!Af'r' (30) CAYS BtfORC
RECUIA(O 'JiMPOAAAT OR PEfU,tAH[NT [ROSICH CONTJ;OL (EC SCCO/M\11.CH. ,_...NDSCAPIUG, tTC ) IS INSf.Au.£0. UNl.tSS
Oll1ERVCSE APPROVE.0 ev THE \OCA\. (Nnn
?' IN °"C£R fO MINIMIZE tROS,ON POltNflAL.. AU ltMP~AJn' (SfftVCfUAAL) EPOSIO"I COtff"OI. "-'CA'SllR[S SHA.U..
a
9.
10.
"·
1:.
A ec INSP[CTtO AT A IAIUIMVW or CtfCE [\'CR'I' TWO (2) '8£Cl<S ANO AnER EACH ~cu:nCANT $l'(),IIM EVCNT ANO
REPAIAto OR RECONSTRtJCT(D AS tt£C£SSAR't IN ORDER TO ENSURE 'f'ME COHTiflUCD PER'rORMANCC Of' t'HEIR IN'ttND(O
FUNCTION.
e. A[UAIK IU PL.AC£ IJHT\. 'SUCM n ... c AS AU nit $URROON01NC OIST\.IAB[O AA(AS AA[ SUf nOtl'IT\. T
5TA8tUZEO ,t,S OElI:RMIN[D 8T tl1t tf'OSON COt,,fltOL INSP(CTOft
C. BE fl[MOVCD AFfER tMC Sitt HAS BEEN SUtr1C1£Hfl. T 'SfABtU :tO AS D[l'[RU1f1(0 BY Tl-It EFrOS!c»f CONTROi..
tNSPEC.TOR
WHEN TtMPORAA'i' ERO'SION CONTROL M[A.SVR!S ARE RCMOVCO. Th[ t)[\("\.OPCR $HALL ec RtSPOh$18l.C rOR THE CUAN UP
ANO REMOVAL or AL.L S[O!MENT ANO otaAIS. rROM Al\. ORAIHAC[ INrRASTRlJCTURE AND Oll1[R PUBUC rACIUTitS.
Tl-I[ CONTRACTOR SHAU. Ct..[AN !JP ANY INAtl~TENT OEP0Sil1t0 MA.T[RI AL IUMEt)I AT[l'( ANO MO.( St.IA( STREtTS ARC rRtt
~ AU.. UAf[ftlALS a Y THE END or EACH VIIORk.lNG OAT
ALL RE1'AIN[0 scoiutuTS. PAROCUUALY TJ-IOS[ ON Pa\'[0 ROADWAY SURFA.C(S. SMA.U. BE REMOvtO IINO Ol?O'SCO ~ Iii A
MANN(R ANt) LOCAUOt,I $0 A$ NOT TD CAUSE m[IR -'t1£ASE INTO A.HY WA.TEAS OF' TI-I[ UNlTEO S'U.l'ES
NO ~L STDCkPU SHALL cxcrm ttN (tO) FttT IH H(lCHt AU. SOIL STOC~P!t..£.'S SHAU. ec PPIOttCttb f'POM 'SE'.t>tlACNf
TRANSPDftT Br 51.JPFAC[ AOUCHDllNC. WA T[PINC. ANC PCAIM[T[R SILT rENONG .ANY SOIL STOCliPIU: fl[MILIJ'IINC .arftfl
TH!Rh (lD) D,_n ~1111 BE SEEOCO AND UULCH[O
OTY OA01NAtlC£ AN'O COl...0RA00 DISCIUAC[ P{PMIT 'Sr5T[M (COPS) REOUIREU(NTS MAk C IT l,ltl l.A'lllf'IJL TO OtSCHAACC OR
AU.0* Tl1£ DISCHARGE or AN't POU.UUNT CIA C:ONTAMl:NAT[D WAT[R mou COUSTRUCTION 'SIITES.. POLL\JTANTS INCLVOC OV T
ARE NOT UMITtD TO OISCAROE0 BOll.DINC UAT(R1ALS. CONCRCTt TRUCk WASHOt.H. O.EM1C A1,,$, OIL A.Ht) CA$ PROO.JC~.
UTTER. AN() SAt~'ITAAT WA.'STC 11-4£ DE\.O..OPER SHAU Al All nuts 'U.kC M-IAftV[R ~EASUR[S AR[ NECESSARY TO ASWRE
fli[ PltOPDI COll1AtNM(Nt AUO C)~OSA!.. or POU.UT.VHS OU THE sire I N ACCORDANC[ 'Mll-1 ANY AN[) AU APPL,IC A8l.[
LOCAL STAT[, ANO rtDEAAL R[CULATI()NS.
IA. • OCSIGNATtt> AR[A SHAU ec PAOVIOCO ON SITE F'OR CONCR[T[ muc:1< CH\JT[ WA.SHOUT THC ARC A SH AU BE
CONSffllJCTEO 'SO AS to CQHTAIN WASHOUT MAttRIAL AND l,.OCAT[D AT l.£AST nrrv I 50~ f'EET ... ...., FROM ANI' W4Tt.RWO
DOAIKC CONSTRUCTION OPQ-1 COMPL[TIOU ~ {'0tlS1"1JCTION ACTI\1'11'1[$ TH( COHCfiCTt *A'SH~Jf MAftfiHA\. MU. BE
AEMO"f:0 AND PROPERLY OISPostD OF' PRIOR TO lHE IP(A eouc P(SroPED
I ~. TO [NSIJR( D4.A1 SEOIMC,,tf DO~ NOT wove OFF Qr PARCELS UNDER ('QHSTRUCTIOf( CHE ~ MORE or 1l1E FOU.C'IW-I~
S[I)IU[HT/[JIOSIOO CONfRot. BMl>s 'SHA.U. at INStALl.tb AU(> 1i1AtN1'AINCCI Ulifl\. THt t.,O,t$ ~c sum~IOHl.Y STA81UZED
A en.ow AU. QJTT[R 00•1!.POUTS
D OUT 10 ORAINAC( SWAt.£5.
C ALOUC: 00¥1t4STAEAM LO T LINES.
0 Ofli[R LOCATION'S. IF' NttOUI
INSTAU. BUPs AS SHOVIN ON Di!: EP~ON CONll'Ol PLANS P,o,..,oto H[ffCIN
H. CONOtTIONS IN Tl-IC FltL.0 MAY WARRAUT [Ra$i0H COtlTROl M!:ASVRES IN A.001TI0tl TO WHAT tS S,HOY1U 011 THESC PLANS
Tl1( O[VCLOP[R SHAU lt.lPLEM:[NT Ylt1AT[-w{R W[A$tJF!tS ARE O(T(PMIN(D J'l(C£S5 Afh A~ PIREC:TED 8T TH£
CITY/COUNTY/STAT(.
,. VCHCLE TRACklNC CCtHPIOL PAD SHAU. BE IN ST.ALLED '!'MEN NEEDED rDR CONSTRlJC tlON [OU:PM[Ht lt1CUlblNC: eu t HOT
L!Ml'rtt) TO PERSONAi \.(HIC:U:S txmNC £:,,1snNc;: AOA!>WA YS NO [ARll1E'N MAT[AIAI.S. I E Slc»I(, 0 RT. ETC SHAU. BE
PLAC[O IN THC C1JR8 .t C\JT1[A OR ROA O'#AY' AS A NAMP TO ACi:£~S TEMPORARY STOCl<PIL[!li STAGING JJl[AS
CON$TRUCTION MATtRIAL'S,. CONCR(Tt •ASHOUT ARf;AS. ANO OR BUILDING 5lTES
BENCHMARK
AU.. \OncAL. 1Hf'OAu•noo t$ BASCD ON • sire •s~r D41\J.,. rs 1.00000 rru
LEGEND
., --.-pJJ---
n
GR
HP
rr
IOS
10,
toP
[QC
TW
s.-
e.-
cx1snNc WIUOA/1' CONTOUR
cxrsnuc uA.JCR/~· co...irouR
PROPOSED Mlt,l()A/t ccrnouR
PAOPO!ED ~•~/~' CONTOUP
PROPO~ $POT CUVATION
rxisnuc 9>0r a.£va nONs
now UN£
GRADE
tllCH POINT
nNl~[D nOOR
TOf" or SI.AB
TOP or fl).lt-lDAQON
£DCC Of P&l;{M(NT
EDCC Of' CRAVEL
TOP or WAU
SIO[WA.1.J(
~z-..
BOTTOM or WAU. 10 0 10
n.o w 01A[CTlDN
® ==="'-====-==2° Know wha l's below. Call befora you dig. QR;ljtHAL :iCAt[; 1· -10·
i
fli
" ~ ~ "' ~ 0 ~ i .. .. z § !: I
ii!
g .,
s: .. a:
• •
~
LU cc
~
s: .. a:
ZCIJ <( LU
C!) (..) 9z .w
(/) 0 en-en W
C\I w MCI:
~ ~
0 0
~ ~
0 0
~ ~ ~ ..
! ., .. ., .. s: s: ;: ;: .. "' "' "' "' "' "' "'
GRADING&
DRAINAGE PLAN
SHEET 05 of 09
I -~-r
I
7
I
J
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
L
tx1S lit1G 8 UIL01 t1 G
7
BUILDING
N
1--
0
....J
-
BUILOINC
1--
0
....J
3299 S. LOGAN STREET RESIDENCES
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
EXISTING
BUILDING
SIOEw•U< P • \/£RS
(TYP)
1--
0
....J
1--
0
....J
L-
~
I
I
I
I
CONTRACTOR & DEVELOPER GENERAL NOTES
1 "ll NAl'[lttA.1,S, IIIOIIMUJ-,~IP At() CtliSfft\lC flON (S Putll,C IMP!t0.(U(Nf'\ $HAU. M([f
0111 t)t([O l)C SU,tOAR0S AIU) SP[O'1CATIQN'S or nt[ Cll"r 0/f CNl;l.I'Al'OOO. CQUNh qt
AlhPArtOl AND •PPl,:CJ.8U: $141[ .AND ,C,[ftA&.. lttWlAflON'S ~ti'[ lhtllt IS CQl#UCf
l!!l(l'W[[.N fti(S[ Pt.AAS .t,t-,Q th( SPCOntAflC)t,,1$, (),t AN1 APPUCA81L ST""l0 11'0$, TM[
MO'S,1 ft['l~tll,'{ $1.,NOAfitO SN~ APfl'l.l ALL ""°""' NTlalt tk[ ~l!tl.JC "IGMT-Cr'-ll'"-Y
'SH&lL 8( IN'SP[CltD ANO APPJtOVC) 81 1M( Oh Of [N!'.l.('11()00
2 au (11!£t[P£HCC; fO ANT PUDUSHtO '$TAt4DMl0~ SliAU,. "[ftR TO M LAil.ST R[YIS,()N r7
1.A() STANO~. l,IN,,£.SS 7[CflCAL1.T srarm OfH[.111:11111~
l AU SANIJMIIY UWClt. UCWU.I ~"'11. AN() lJIIATtfl Ut-lC C0NSJ'ltUCflON AS lli[LJ. AS POIIICR
,IH;) OfHCII blhD ufl.Jrr INSl'Al.lAfl0tl$. SHAU. CONf'(Nll:U ro M Oh or ChCllWOOD
STANDAlt:01 ANO SPconcanQN'S. CUMttNT AT ntt D•lt Of Af'NO'iAC. OI ~c 1'1.AHS Dr
TH[ DTY OT (NQ.[IIQQO [NQNtt•
, ?Ht Tl'PC. Silt. LO(AnoN AHO NUUl!!ICft Of AU. P.NO'IIIN UN0DICltOUr40 unu11cs J.lt[
al'f'II0•IMAft M1(N 9-I0IIIN QN tH[ 0RA111Ht;$ T $HAU 8( DC l!l(!PQN11h,11'f' Of TN(
a,.IPIACfal to \E:Rh THC c~rstOiCt &HD lOCA nON 01 AU. 1,JtO[,tc,tO,JHO u nuncs.
ALCftC lh[ ,t()UT[ Of ~[ Vltlik atroitt ,;ou~c H(W ctNS"'~'hOH tHt
CONJIIIACT'Cf' ~AU. IC i.t:SPQ.ISIBL[ n,rt CMSCO'l(fl, or 111( I.OCA110N Of [IISTINC
UNOVtCR04JND unuru,
!, lHt DC\O.DPDI/CONTltACTOR SH.LU. C(»-,TAeT n1[ U,-JTl HOmtAnON Ct,,ITtJlt Of
CQ.OA',t.00 (UttCC) Al i, .. ec,o.t:2•19e7 AT L[AST 2 W0111t1HG, OATS l'FPIQR to t(CilNMIHi:.
C•Clv.&.nON <IA QU.01NC. TO ., .. '.( ALL RtQSTDl[l) UTIUh LOCAtlONS MARKtD on<rt
IIHR[GISTtll[l) urun [Nn nn {IC ClfTO. / 11,,.,c•'II~ COMPANTJ .utt TO 8[ LOCATtD ,,
CCN I ACTING T}t[ l'[sP(Cfl'o(. ,otR{S(HUTl\11: unurr S[Jl.,,Ct UVAL.5 II"!: At.SO TO ec
LOCAl't:D ~OR 10 8(ClNNlHC (l(AYAnOM Oft Cll"°'NC ll 5HAU. IC M M~ONSISll.lh
~ l'H( 0(\(.1.(IP(fl l) R(LO(Af[ AU. (IJSTING \lflJfl($ THAT CCt.r\JC:1 WITH TM(
P110P05C) IM~0'-1:Mf,.f'S 51t0WN QH tH(1,( Pl.AH$
6 ~ A COHrucr cx1sn 19(1'\UN t•ISTINC. "-MO PA~O!.lll UTl&Jll[S ANO/Oft A DCSICN
wcanc.t.TION 15 A[C,..1110,, ?Ht OCl.ttCWCFI $Ht.U. COCIQCIINArt •TH ~£ (HGIH(tR TO
t,lt(ll,r 1'ttC ot~CN OCSICN MOClnCAllON(Sl WUSf II( AtPJtOvtD e, M OTr 0(
Ct•CU!IWOCO ,,.,OR re 8fc,t,1~ CDNSTIJUCTIOM
7 TH[ liliNIMIJM COO ;M:JI WAftfil' UH($ I'$ ~-0 r(tT AHO nt[ MIAUt,IIJW (O"l{lt IS 6 !, fttl
UNLCS~ O1tttlfWlst H'ltO l't r..c PLAN'S AHO 4flflA0'JCD Br 1)4[ HftR U1'.lh
-8 ft.I[ Clt',(LOPCR !HAU. COUPl r •nt AU OM$ ANO (QH01ftONS Cl Tk( CO,.OUOO P(Jlb,11
rOA 1TORM ••mt O.SCHA.flC[ (Cc:t4UC1 COlOIIU,OO O(PAaTl,l(HI Of 1-1(~'1>1 ...... 1'Dt
OU4LI.TT C0N"'Cl. 0M~ON. {)OJ) Hl-3'90). Th( STOJIM llrAU MANACDIC.Hl' PL•H. •HO
DI( tltOSKlN CC»HRCl. P\.AN
I TtM"Ol'AIIY 00$IQN C);IHflltQ., OIJPIMC CONSIIIIUCTION SHAU. BE PltOVIQCD A.S SHO'M't ON
"1£ (ltOSO, CONTPCL Pl.AH rf "(QIJIIIO) l!Jr ft.I[ CITT C'f/ tHCUWOQ.I AU 0-0~
COtintOl M[ASIJRES SHALl et ti,1U41AIH('O IN CODCI RtpJJlt 9t nt[ OC\IQ.OPOt ...... n. SUCH
tlM[ AS M CHTIR( DISTI.IRBtD AJl[A l!i SlABIUim Wint HARO WRr.t.r;c_ sa01~ QR
LNtCS(APINC
11 MO fl0R,c .... , COMMENC[ 'IIIIM~ AHr ~PIIO'o'Q) Oft UNW'RQ\{D PVBUC o'ltlQtt-or-•u
UNtl. .l PtCHT-Of'-UI' PCf'Mlf ()It O[V[l.~MOlf CCNS'htUC11CiN Ptrt .. 1 CS OlhlH[tJ, ti
Al'-Pl,ICAeii.£'.
BENCHMARK
10
LEGEND
[xtSTlNC '#A TCR UNE
E'.•isnNc S-AN S['IIIC~ U,..[
[Xl5nNC 0".'(f'H(AO [l(C
[Xl'int-lC BULOING
PROPOStO WA T[ft UN(
PROPOSCO SAN ~wt:R UNE
Ex STREE t UCHf
[11 SICtl
[11 V.&.L1;'(
EX TRArr1c SfCN.Al 80JC
uruh POLE
CU¥ At40KA
cuw POU
t11 M[t[A
ltl.EPHOUE PCOES:f.AL
Cl(,UI-OU1
[ll 'SAP, M A.NHO\£
0 10
ORICtUA.L SCAlt 1 .. "' 10'
------w--------s--
---w------•---
®
Know whal's below.
Call blfora you dig.
• •
'" !z w w a: :E 0 I-"-C
fl) 9< wa: z ,,.. >9
<(ww l!;l o CJ (.) (J
0...JZ t::ci ~o .w 0 0 me w~
O>ci) ~~ Rlw :si
C') a: 0.. UJ
UTILITY
PLAN
SHEET 06 of 09
-
t
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
r
I
\
I
I \ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I \ \
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ?ii \
~\
\
I
\
I
'\
I 4'
I r I.
I
I
I
I
\
EXISTING 0NE
ST0RYHOUSE
LOT#1
NEWH01!15E1
PRePOSm
PR~ll:Y
FENCETYP_
L0T#2
NEWl'iOUSIE2
l.!.0T#;3
LOT#4
LOT#S
\\ ',
\
I I
I I
\
I I
I I
\
I I
I I
\1 I
➔Ell&l<PS
I \
I 0 EJI. RETMNIOO-.i.
I ,\ \
I I
\1 I
I I
\ I I
\' \ I I
\\ \
\
I I
I I
II I
I I
I I
\ I ·1
\
\ I
I I
\\ I (/)
. I I
\1 \ \
1\ \ 0
1\ \ G)
,\ \ '"ho \\ \ z.
\ \ \
\\ \ ~ 1\ \ ~
I I
\ I I
I I
\1 I
I I
\ I I
I I
\ I I
I I
\1 I
I I I I I
1\ \
\I I
I I
\\ \
\\ \
I I
r • \ \' I ,. I I
\I I
\\ \
I I
\
I I
I I
\
I I
I I
\
I I
I I
\
. I I
I I
\
I I
I I ~ \
' I I
l.01 5 \ / : . ,..,-1 I I
---I,' --------,c:1--oi-=""':.-,/ .. ,!--
---====_=_-:::::::::!~'(-~:0:/ I\" 'E. ----=::-----Q f"'\ V ~---. ._ ~ --;. ---:.--==--------------E. rL
--c_oNf;:~~=-0------iiis~DSCAPEPLAN , , '! -~ -===-_-::.-----1-· SCAI.E:1";10'--0" I".. 'u; ~,<!~~-SCAI.E:1"•10' NORTH
3299 S. LOGAN STREET RESIDENCES
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
SITE CALCULATIONS
t.01' #1 lOT#2 LOTIJ LOT14
SITE AREA r,n .
UlnJNG LOT CllVlUGl fflrUCTUlflS
SI NGLE r &M ILY
,.,.uua.J A'-4 •l"
GARAGES
,..,.,,,,asnrucn,,ra
GARAGES
RUIOE NTIAt.
l ST0Rl PAtlO
ORIVf WAY (UIQ f OI NG 12 n•
TOfAl, STIIIUCTUlll sfJ
, .. aNTOfSm 1,n
MAT'l'IIIAl IUQUllflMDtr ..
M l N(MUM Rl.A AR(Alt/}(41JM 0/ S/10
.IA AlttA "'0,os(t)
,._o,os,u tAfllOSCM'l AMA Of 1111
UVCNG tANMCAPf: MlN. (1/1 (~ {JI lit.A}
UVIIJIIGI..UIOSUJot,llll0NSfO(t/l
"Of-lLAASUV1NGLAHDKAN.
f01AI tlFQIJlflfOTltFS(TIT)
,ua fllllS $111UC1Ullll tOCVQ
lOTAl "CMIXD tuts
f0f AL Jl[QulR( Q SHRU91 ( Ta~)
•ta SWIIUBS . Sfl UC'fUltl to cull
TOTAi. NflCMDrD SHIIIUIS
fOTALPIOWKOOflJU.MPlt&U,
1•11GA110N TAI'
DOMtSTICAUTOMATIC
,.12S
1,150
""
!SO
••
1,901
416-~lli
1,6)0
1112
•.r.L
1,240
1,000
!,611
l
l • 17
s
l!
•
•.Git '·"'
SSO ,so
1.SU 1.Hl
96 96
2,2l9 2,229
,t7.S~ 41.!i"'-
J.17i l,87~
2.lOS 2.l~ .,,. .,,.
I.SU l,SU
IJ3f 1.)),1 --l l
2 2
l • •• ..
6 &
21 ll
19 19
QI.IAIIIAUCf~i.:;11,iAf(,OQl.t.G(QJ,.Qf'OUt)Alllli<Ot.Gtl~lu~Ollh,l!Sllf
.. OIJA1IIIICt:tf'ICfSOIJ•tt•001..ct•r<)1MUC....,,tt~,..t,n•cc~,010
Wi!fOl llo+t l"I C'llf01'Ct~OIIUI-C1" .... Coot wwt .. 1t"1 n'OPttt,101.,0AtJ
LANDSCAPE KEY
SUGGESTED PLANT PALETTE
DECIDUOUS TREES
BOTANICAL N.lUE J COUUOt-1 "fAUE
Ac,rf1Nln9m·~umnbl1n /AutumnElaz•M1ple
E•llbnglrNIE,~ng Ttff
Gl•atti• 1r11~mtioe lfflPl'rllll I l111p,nal Hcn.,-lcx:1.41
Ko.i1eut .. aa panic:IJDIGokiln Rain T1H
r1111 amenc:ana RtOnonlf J R,Clmond Amlnca, Llndtn
EVERGREEtt TREES
BOTAHtCAl NAME I COMMON NAME Jun1P9,..,. iaipi.toru:m Sqrodl.i f S11'!'100 . .t JLl'IIPl'f
Plnu.1m,:■t1 Sh1rwoodComt»tta IC>warfBtrllecon•Pirw
ORUAUENTA.L TREES
90TN•HCAl NAME I COUMON NAME
Aeer ginnate comNK:tum t ComPIICt Amur Mipl•
Ac:er t.atancumlTatanan Map!•
Crata~•morelantnM Tota lfobaHltWttlorn
Malut • RaCNnt t R1c11re Crab Appl•
Mllvt• Spr"'1Sno,,, JSc:m9Sno-CttD"'"'t
P1un1o11 V"O"'ilftl iN.ibert I C,naot A.a en~,,.,
e>qrfA~EtlTAl ~~SES
C1l11Till)totw, 1eullff0tl ~'1 FO.rfiler / F,dl .. ~Nd Cr au
f.-..uca glluca EJiptiBlue' I 811,11-fna,e
Heieto,nctic,n Mfflp,tMlfnt 18/\llt 0« Gt"'
MIS~~ t1n.-.. Morning 1,tg,t I Mc,lftng Lt~ Sit'wtt G,tM
Mll~UI 11n,,.,. Ventg.ttul / V•n~ld J■panew 5'vet Cr••
PtnM"""' lloc,tcuf'OIISH IF -..rrta111 Ofatl
P,tn~tt...,.Npla.rQ><JN Halfttl" IOw1rtFour01ftGIIM
Sch&tact,ynum •~um , uas. GhHolltm Grn•
,.aos
U 3S
,so
m
96
2.361
f92'1
1,5122
llSl
,s,.
l,>06
UDO ....
I
l • ..
6 .,
2&
LOT#$
3.s ,o
1.41!17
OD
171
71
2,lSl
6().tw.
1,0:2
UIS ,.,.
900
l.100
16V.
2
I • ..
s
ll
ID
GENERAL NOTES
TOTAL
lJ,IIJ JUIAl cous,,ucuou oocu,.,u:TS suaM:TIED 10 THl CfIT
SHALL C0ll10PM TO lH£ PEOUIPfJ,mas 0U1UH£0 Wl1Hrl
THIS PUO SU81,ltJTAL LUO
1,011 -..,...,
J.Sll -...
lAfl0$CAPE PlAllS 0EP,C1E0 AR£ SCKfr,UliC ~I f lAIUPE •uo •Pt SUflJECT 10 ,.,oOflCATIOUS. H4£ OEVHOPEPS
PPOG~Af.l. THE &Ull01UC:iS.APCHtlfC1UPE AllOIAPCiU
OEl,\OG~APHIC. OP Ol HEP fltCESSAPY fl'EOU1"1ft,1U:t1
THE lOCAIIOU Of L.l.110SCAPf PL•lllr:GS r,1A Y &E Atl[PE:J
TO PS?Oi/1D[ .l.O[OUAIE CLEAPAUCE FPOIA lHE F■tAl
LOCAUOU OF UtlOEPGPOUllO uu.mu THE e•SE o,
OECDUOUS 0EE5 SHA.Lt 8f PLAlllED UOCl 05EP THAii S
r,or.-1 wf1 UllOIES. fHE &•SE Of EV£POP(frl f PEES SH•H &E
P'LAUTEO 110 ClOSEP l~Ar, tcY f~r., AU. YIEl ltlllffU Ulll[SS
OTHEPWISE OIPECTEO IY THE Cff'i , ... .., GR•SS •REAS OES,OUAJ[D AS lli'RICAIEO TUPf SH All &E
SEEDfO OP SOODEO WltH .. ~oucwr IOl{PAllt G~AS.S
Ml(IUPE ,41.7'
'9.7SA
UII ..,.
&,Ill
r...161
7111
14
9
J7 ..
29
U1 ..
lH.E SIZE OF DECIDUOUS TPEES SHAU IE A Mlll trlaVMOf: I •
CAUPEP AIIOTHE SIZE Of EVEPCiPE[tl TREES SHAll MA.
IAUl\l.4U/.t Of 6'·8 t, HUGHt
THE. 51.!f OF Of:CIOUOUS •110 tvO'G~Utl SMlltJM SHAH eE A
1.1u11MUM OF S G.AtlOIIS
11·1[ SC'.E OF 0PrlAt.'1fl l1Al GRASSES At10 PEPEtHUALl SHAU
BE A MOl:MUM Of I GALLOll
6.. THE OUAUllh ~t10 tOCAllC:ll OJ lAII05CAPE. AUD
t-4UO$CAFE £lEMEJ:tl Of PCtEO MAY 8E ALTEPEO WIIHDl THE
COml PUClOfl oocur.,uns Wl?H THE ltll[l:1 Of RETAllllllG
APPPOXf.4Aa FLA AIIOllVlftG l,lUt)!.CAPE l01All
WttEUlVEP POS$16l.E. l.iECHAIIIC.AL OEVIC(S $HALL 9E
SCPEfllEO WliH LAtlDSCAPE I.A.Atnnt.L
10 All LAll:::>5CAPE to'IPPOVU.-l[JnS lHAlll !E O!.SIGIIEO AUD
111STAlt[O\"lff~ THE ltll[IJf 10 PPESf PvE lttE PEDESTRlAIJ
EXPEPIUlCE WKI\E EIIStJPtrtO PtJ9llC SAn(T AIIO
IAAllliAIUII IG A HIGH AfSIHrTiC OUAlff'i WffHrl THE sne
11 pt A UT OIVIPSCIY SHOULD BE COllSIDEPlO WHEII SELE.CUIG
St,EE1 IPfU IHE MA!l;ll.4UI.\ PEPCEUl•GE Of AUY OUE
SHPU&OP 1'1'EE S,.EClfS Otl Sill SHOULD llOI EJl'CUO 33';.
1~ FEUC( LOCAIIOrlS APE COIIC(PTUAl AIIOWU eE ftJPIHfP
P[fu1rn lrl THE COIISTPUC'IIO l OOCUMUITS
13 fACH lOt'S lAIIDSC ... PE SHA.L. fll lRPIGA.fU:)USIIG umtJ
OWfl IUD[f'HIOEIIT 00M!11C JAP
,&ANTING 11.ANOAIO,
THE F!EOU~[O LAllOSCAPE ,O[A {OP PLAI SHALL ee
CALCUlATEOFPOM Ht~ AGGPEG•JE Cl H<E 101AL Sil[ APf.t.
Ml0U01 fP0,,1 lllC)IVIOUAl LOTS
Z, P[PlAe.Lf l t,c,,7 J A 1.111'111.\UMOr ~Of lHE IC 1Al sne
APEA SHA.ll 8E Pl A
J A MlllD.IUM Of 70':.0F TH£ SOUAPE f00f,t.Gt: OF PL A
SH.t..~l &E LIVOIG ,t.trOSCAP[
A MJUll,tUM Of OttE lPEE PEP EVE PT o:s SOU APE fE£1 or
PlOUIPft) lAllOSCAFED AP[A SHALL !IE PEOUIP(O
~ A ~Ju1111.,u,..1 Of !,ta O f lPfE PEOUIPEIJEt:tS S.HAll BE
Pt.-.r11ED8E1WEEIJ 1HE PPlllCIPAlSTPUCIURE AIIOCUPl!i
WHEII TH( Pf0UIP[0LAll0SC,t.PE AF![A. IS lts.5 tHA.U OIIE
IHOUS.t.UO IW0-HUU0P£0 flrlY fl :.501 SO n A. MIUt.-1~,.1
Of t wo IPUS SHALL eE PfOUIP[D
A l.,UU11AUl..t Of OU[ SHiU& PEP 100 SOUAFf ltfl OF
LAUOSCAP(D APEA L$ PEOU1,'f0 ... J.t11lr.1UI.\ or .xr..Of
SHPU8 PE:OUIPfMEUIS SHAU 8E PlAUTEO BEIW(fll T~E
PfillCIPA L .SJPUCTUP[ AUO CUP8
~ A LO\."I WA.10' PlAUl PA\fTTE IS PPOPOSEO. A.D0~0t1At
Pt•rns,.ii .. , ae PPOPOS(O Ill SU&S[OUEl◄l PPOCUS[S
.t.. OPOIIGMl IOW·'AUl PLAUT l"AL[H£ HAS em• SlJCGU1E:)
A00f101Al F'I.Aras M"Y &f PPOPOSEO tu st:~eouu,,
PPOC:lSS
A tA II IIIAUM Of I 11Pf£l/CA110Pf 11,'ff VICl,L BE PL.a.111[0
WllHDI tHE St~HnCAPE AS PAfrl 0' t.,l tPI lb Cf PIIOll iC,
l01 ~OU£ 10 SITE SIZE cous.t11•11ts1 PE1.,ouuG !Pt CAIi et
fUlJIUED 8T OPrlAfAEutAt OP EVfPO PEfll tPEES
OEcm~s SHAl:JBS
POTANICAC. NAME I COMMON NAME
p;it..-. 11Unt,ergt-A1rCp.nJJd'N u.n. I Dwarf ~~ .. r Japa""" ea,t,my
Caryoplent :r d1l'ld0n'""" blu, Mist I EM!# MIii Sh1ull
Cittt,t. C.ftlOtl'IM I Eftlttn At«luO Ml,llll-&t\lnk
Cornua ..,,, .. KIINy'I I Kt11ty1 OoCJl'o'OO(I
FcnyUu:r 1rd .. lM08 Alndd10wllrf IOw.rFot1ytlla
0.nlla 'ir'ldofll PIM"II I 'NoldwaHn
L.,ovtltuln 'l'Ulll)lle Lodl-ftM I l0d■1'IM PfN1I
P01ttC>11 INOCOM . GOl cJ Otoo I Gold O,cp P~,,...
Pntnus bNMyi Paw!H B~H I S.ncJ Chlury
RhlAlromabCI ·a,c.-Low /0.o.lowFtagrat'IISUNIC
Fflbft •pnum I .-.ipne Cun ant
$1Jil .. l I Dl.ffllldl. AnVIOtl)' Wt:tl .. / .t.nlflony V\llltfet $pt8tl
5(., ... • burNld9 Lll'l"l•ITIOUftd TIii I Ll/tl.OuncJ Seit ..
Syhf'IQtffl-,.it PtLbt,, r0wlrfl'I.OIH1'1JIIC'
E.Y.(~[EN $HR•~~
BOTANCALNAME /COUMOH NAME:
Al'1m,ltphyl0t, I ~t,cJOt,...J Mtf\ltftfll
-..Cloata~Cl'I I cdolacbtl'IIIS P1nc:tu10 I Panc:Mo Manz.-.M
B<t•~lne■IMulllft wre""'"" l'Ntnle,g,Nl'IKOle.,.l.dtlel•■-BohNed
Cote,,.. .. .., damm■n Cotll e .. ...,. / 0.11t>trry Cotonene ..
Cotontnc" Mif:oric.lrl Pl'l'P'••m.-, Perl)Ulil~ Rocti. Spi111y c«onen1"
E YDl'lymualcrtune. Cdm ■t• /Purp..i .. tWm..-CfffP't
J1,1~ honzontel4 pl1,1Jn01t Yo1,1ngstown I Cr .. png Jl,lrtPft
Jutw;lffifl tlonzontal:I 81ua Ctup I blut Chp Jul'll~r
J~MDll'\I AleaM l~a~t,el
J1.1nrpl'l\rt t.tbftl 8"1t10 , B~o J1111c.1
Pinu. mugo '-'oPI I Uugo Pin,
• •
t,
i I I
! ~ i .......
'
1-w w a:
~ z <. en
(!) w oo _Jz
•W eno
men
C\I w ("') a:
r;. ~ii
St"' -8.:. UO'
i,• -.,.!, v:;;
~-; ;;: :!!
.!.-Ii •llu ~::;.r
S!:,; I! ~c :v~·r ~:,;,.._ ti~= u~•
LANDSCAPING
PLAN
SHEET 07 of 09
* ILLUSTRATIONS ARE DEPICTIONS OF ARTISTS
INTERPRETATION AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
1 CONCEPTUAL STREETSCAPE PERSPECTIVE.
LOOKING NORTHWEST AT THE CORNER OF S. LOGAN AND E. FLOYD
3299 S. LOGAN STREET RESIDENCES
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
SHRINER
lWO-UNIT RESIDENCE
SHRINER RESIDENCE lWO-UNIT RESIDENCE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
LOOKING AT THE WEST SIDE OF S. LOGAN ST NTS
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
REMODELED EXISTING RES IDENCE
• •
C,
I i f ~ Ji i:i:: s ..:-. !
I
t-w w
[C
~
z
<Cl)
(!}W oo ....JZ
•W ooo o,-
0) Cl)
C\I w C")[C
!l, .• ill Jt 0,
'B~ .. ~
;s~
~-f; .,,:!}
cl,-s • t, V ~~.e-
5!!.l;I!
';" .c ~., r t!;l; .•
~~= .....
..... z w ~o a..o 0 < ... a: ~g WO 0 C..)
~ c:i z o =>o @~ z w z ...
5 ~ a..w
CONCEPTUAL
RENDERING
SHEET 08 of 09
*
•
ILLUSTRATIONS ARE DEPICTIONS OF ARTISTS
INTERPRETATION AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE. 3299 S. LOGAN STREET RESIDENCES
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
' PROPOSED 3-CAR PROPOSED PROPOSED 2-CAR ADDITIONAL REAR ACCESS PROPOSED
GARAGE DAS. 3-CAR GARAGE GARAGE DAS. PARKING GATE 2-CAR GARAGE
CONCEPTUAL ALLEY PERSPECTIVE
lOOKING NORTH BETWEENS. LOGAN ST ANDS. GRANT ST.
VEGETATIVE
BUFFER
SHRINER
RESIDENCES
• •
~
I ~ J Ill l
~ 1 ~ -
'
1-w w er: ~
z < Cl)
C)W oo
-12
•W
00 Cl m-0> Cl)
C\I w
C') er:
i;.
~ :il 3t O>
'B ffl
11• ~t
~.~
al~
.!,-~ ;: id-
J, i; 2 Sl~ C
~.,!, r f~., -·· ij 2! • .... ~.
CONCEPTUAL
RENDERING
SHEET 09 of 09
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
LOIS 2$ lltAOUCM 29, INClUSl'IE, BLOCK 8. ROSC &DOlllON 10 ENClE-.QOO, COI.OR&OO. COUNlY 01'
ARAPAHO( SlAlt or COI.OA&DO
TITLE COMMITMENT NOTES,
!HIS LANO SUA'IEY DOES NOi COllSll lUlt A TIil[ SEARCH BY s>. [NCIN[[RINC, lLC IO O[ltAMIN[
OMi[RSHIP or lltlS fflACl, VEAIrY IHE O[SCRIP noN SHO ...... 'IEAlrY IH[ COMP& TIBIU lY or !HIS
O[SCRIPllON YOIH !HAT or ADJACENT TRACIS, OR 'l[RlrY [AS[MtNB or RECORD FOR AU.
INr(lllM&TION R[C&ROl>IC EASEM[NIS. RIC>H-or-w&Y OR TIil[ or RECORD. s,. ENCINEERIN C, LLC
RELIED UPON TIil[ COM.,tTUENl NO 1$0237$, PR(P&R[D BY CHICAGO TIil( INSURANCE CO.,P&NY
rOA SHADOW CR[[K HOMES, LlC, A COLORADO LIMIT(O UA811JTY COUPANY, DATED JUNE 28. 2013
Al 7·JO AM.
IH[ rOUOYONC COUU(NIS AR[ IN R[CARDS ID TH[ &80'1E •REr£RtNCEO TillE COMMITMENT TH£
NUMBERS IN OUR co .. utNTS CORRESPOND TO TH[ NUMBERING SYSltU usco IN THE llllE
co1,11;m;EN T
lctlEIIUI.E A
lfDI -
1 NOTED ABOVE (Commitm,nt tto. ond dcilt)
2 +&. S,. [NQN[[RINC, LlC QI0 NOT EXAMIN[ OR ADOR[SS TH[S[ I11:MS
$ TH[ LEGAL DESCRIPTION or TH[ L .. 0 SURVEYED IS SHOWN PER THIS COMUIIM[NT, TO TH[
BEST or OUR KNO..,,EOC[ &ND BELIEr
SCHEDULE I • IECTION 1 IREOUIREIIENTBl
s>. [NClli[[RttlG. lLC DID NOT [X&MlHE OR ADDRESS THESE I11:US.
SCHEDULE I • IICTION 2 IEXCE'TIONI)
•n:• -
I 'IIS•BLE AND APPARENT [\'!DENCE or RIGHTS OR Cl&IUS or PARTIES IN POSSESSION &RE
SHOWN M[A[ON 10 IME B[Sl or OUR KNOWUOGE &NO BEuEr
2 \'ISl8L[ AND APPAR[Nl ['IIO[NC[ or [AS[U[NIS OR CLAIUS or [ASEMENIS AR[ SMO ...
HEREON 10 THE BEST or O<JR KNOWLEDGE ANO BELI[r
J 'IISiBLE AND APPARENT DISCREPANCIES. CONrLIC rs IN BOUNDARY UNCS. SHORT ACES IN AR[A
ANO ENCROACMU[NIS AR[ SHO ... H[R(ON TO TH[ B[Sl or OUR KNOWLEOCE ANO B[utr
4 •8 s>. WGIN[[Rll•C. LlC 010 NOi [XAUINE OR ADDRESS llt[S[ HEl,IS
9 IH[ PLA l or ROS[ •OOITION 10 ENGLEWOOO RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2 AT PAGE J7 DOE ~
NOT APPEAR 10 CONTA!lj ANY mus OIHER THAN LOT DIM[NSIONS AND smt[T LAYOUT
IHESC ARE SHOWN H[R[ON TO IM[ BES! or OUR KNOWLEDGE AND B[LItr TERMS.
CONDITIONS. A[SfflICn0N5. PRO'IISiONS OR NOTES ON THC PLAI, Ir ANY, HA'IE NOT BEW
[XA .. IN[D OR AODRESSCD Bl JR ENC>NEER.,C. LlC.
10. S,. ENCIN[[RINC LlC 010 NOi AOOR[SS QR [XAl,IIN[ THIS I T[M
ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 34
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO
J/'Sl liE
V .. -·· ,-·~ :;; :;; -~ ~
I "' " :;; 3 g :;;
I ~ :;; ~ :;; ; ! i ~ ~ I I IS .. r • .. .. .. "' "' "' ..
(.. ClftAltO A¥(.
t . HAtiiPO[._ •'t<.
'r--.. ........ ,.$ ----1.....:..~~+--,--+----''--___.-t
I
~ONtTT MAP
$CAL£ ,•.,oco•
I~
~~
GENERAL NOTES,
•• D[rlNI OON C[RnrY, C[RTlrlCATION -A PRortSSiONAL'S QPIN10N BASED ON HIS OR HER
OBSERVAnON or CONOITlONS. KNOW..EDCE. NrOAu&TION ANO BElIEr5. " IS EXPRESS LY
UNDERSTOOD THAT IH[ PROrESSIONAl.'S CtRnncA n0N or A CONOtnON'S [XISltNCE RELIE'IES
NO Ollt[R PAR!Y or ANY RESPONSiB•Ll TY OR OBUCA !ION ME OR SH[ HAS ACCEPTED BY
CONTRAC I OR CUSIOU.
z.
].
..
5.
PER C.R.S. ,e-o,-soe. ANY PERSON WHO KNOYONCI.Y REl,IO'IES. ALltRS OR O[(ACES ANY
PUBLIC LAND SUR'l[Y MONUU[NT OR l ANO MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY, COUMITS A CLA ~S 1-.Q
(2) t,IISO[M[ANOR
ALL RErERENCES HEREON 10 BOO~S. P&G[S, MAPS ANO RECEPTION NUl,IB(RS ARE PUBLIC
DOCW[NTS nLED N !HE R[COAOS or &A&P&MOE COUNIY, COI.ORAOO.
EASEMENTS ANO PUBLIC OOCU.,,[NTS SHO_,. OR NOltD HEREON YotRE EXA.,IN[D AS 10
LOCATION ANO PURPOSE ANO Yl{R[ NOT EXAMINED AS IO RESEAVA TIONS, RCSm1cnONS,
CONO,llONS, OBIJ!CATIONS, TERMS OR AS 10 THE RIGHI 10 GRANT THC SAM[.
BURIED UTIL l l[S ANO/OR PIP[LIN[S AA[ SMOWN PER \'!SIBLE ANO APPARENT SuRr•CE
['IIQ(NC[ OR RECORD ORA .. NCS or IME CONSfflUCTEO UllUl'f LINES. tr l,IOR[ ACCURAT(
LOCATIONS or UNO[RCROUNO UTILIO[S ARE REOUIRED. IH[ u nLITY .. Ll H&'I[ 10 BE VERlrl[O
BY ntlD POTHOUNC s,. CMCIN[[RINC, LlC ANO IM[ SUR'l[Yefl or RECOAO SMALL NOi 8[
LIABLE rOA TM [ LOCATION or OR IH[ rAILURE 10 NOTE THE LOCATION or NON-\OSiBlE ununcs
IH[ BASIS or BEARINC$ 1$ l}t[ -.tST RICHl-or•WAY LINE or SOUTH LOCAN Sffl[ET IT IS
ASSW[O 10 BEAR SOO'OO oo·w
THE LAS! rlE'.O INSPECTION or !MIS SIT[ WAS ON AUCUSI , •• 20 IJ.
PER C.RS JB-~I -106. "All LINEAL UNIIS O[PIC TED ON llt•S LAND SUR'IEY PLAI AR[ US.
SUR'IEY rrcr ONE l,l[T[R (DUALS 39 ]? /12 US SUR'IEY rEEI, EXACll Y ACCOIIOINC 10 THE
"ATIONAL INSnTUTE or STANDARDS ANO TECHNOI.OCY
IHIS Slit IS NOi YOTMIN A O[SICNAT[O r.[ M & 'L000PtAIN, AS DEl[R"IN(O 8Y IH[ nooo
INSURANCE RA TE UAP rOII ARAPAHOE COUNl'f, COI.ORAOO t;&P NUUB[R D800!,C016I~.
AEVISEO QATE O[CEUBtR 17, ZOID TH[ SUBJECT PROPERTY IS lOCArtO IN rLOOO Z0NE
•x•UNSMAOEO•. AREAS 0[11:RUltl[O TO 8£ OUTSIDE THE 500.Y[AR rLOOO PLAIN
10. !Ml BUILOINC rooTPRINl COUIAINS A CALCULATED AREA or 3,021 SOUAR[ rttl.
11 AL• ncs TO R[CORO TIil( LIN(S rROM THE 8Ull0INC CORNERS OR OIHER It;PROVEMEN I S
SMO""' HEREON &RE PERP[N!rCULAR 10 TH[ RECORD TIil[ L It,E.
12 lltEA[ AR[ NO OESICHAIED PARKINC AREAS ON IM[ SUBJECI PROPERTY
1]. n+,s Sil[ CONTAINS A CAL C>!LAltO AR[A or 15,625 SQUARE rcn 0R O.J59 &CR[.
1' CONTOURS SMO_,. HEREON AR[ BASEi) ON ASSUM(O OA!\JM,
!HER[ 15 NO \'ISl8L[ E'IIOENCE ll+AT THE SUBJECT PROPERIY IC B[INC USED A$ A SOI.JO
WAST( DUMP SUUP OR L.ANO>'lU.. s>. ENGINE[RINC, UC C,(l NOi R(S[ARCH ll+[ HISIOR!C US( or THIS SIT(.
SURVEYOR'S ST ATEMENT,
THIS ALTA/ACSM LANO TITLE SUR'l[Y WAS PREPARED rOR TH[ [XCLUSl'IE US[ or IME PERSON.
PE.ASONS OR WTITY NAMED IN IM[ STAlt,,.(NT HEREON. lltlS STAltMENl 00£S NOi EXIEND 10 ANY
UNNAMED PERSON OIi [NnlY YOIMOUT AN EXPRESS R[STAltMENI BY ll+E SUR\/[YQR NAMING SUCH
PERSO" OR ("mv
10 SHADOW CREE~ M(lt,j[5, LlC. A COLORADO LIMlltD LIABIL TV COUP&NY ANO TO CHICACO llTLE
l~SUffANCC COMPANY·
THIS IS TO CERTtrv fHA.T Tt1IS ... AP OR PU.l ANO lH[ SURvtY ON VtHICH ,r RS BAS£0 WCAE MADE tN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2011 UINIMUt; STANOARO O[TM. R[OUIR[MENTS rOA AllA /ACSM LANO 1111.E
SUR'l[YS, JOINTLY ESTAB LISHED ANO AOOPrtO BY ALIA ANO NSPS, AND INCLUDES •rtMS I, 2, l ••. 5.
?(o). 8. 9, ll(a). 11(0). 1]. 14. 18. ANO 19 or TABLE A TH[Rtor THE r>ElD -.QRK WAS COUPL[l[O
0N AUGUST I 4 , 201J, 0A It or UAP OR PL& l·
NOTICE.
P[R CR 5 13-80-105. YOU UUSI COUl,l[NCt ANY LECAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY ocr[Cl IN !MIS
SURVEY YOIHIN THREE YEARS ArlER Y0U rIRST DISCOVER SUCH ocrcc, IN t<O [\'[NT "AY ANY
ACTION 8AS[0 UPON AN Y D[rtCT IN THIS SUAV[Y BE COUU(NCEO I.IORE THAN 11:N YEARS rROM THC
DATE or THE C[RnncATION SHOWN HER[ON JR ENON[ERINC, lLC ANO/OA IH[ SURVEYOR or R[CORO
SMAU. NOT BE LIA6U rOA t;OA[ THAN TH[ COST or TMIS SUR'IEY ANO THEN ONLY 10 IH[ CL [NT
SPtorICALl Y SHO ... H(R[O,, OR IN OUR nu: BY SIGNED AUIMORI ZA llON. ACC[PIANCE AN O/OR USE
or TNIS IN5fflUMENl rOA ANY PuRPOSE CONSTIIUTES ACR[[MENT BY THE CLIENT TO AU T[RUS
STAltD HEREON
.. O•rt
KAI.£ 1••20' oat( AUC UST 1:a. 2013
.<18'"' I$7J9.DO "' 2
ALTA/ACSM LANO TITLE SURVE Y
3279 & 32 99 S LOGAN ST
[NCl.C..:tOO. CO 8011 l
~ J-R ENGINEERING ·--'""'91.10-UG-UD•Ona~r&-m-Z!m
Fatta.~•ww,•ywigw;.
ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY
A PARCEL Of LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 Of SECTION 34
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO
EAST FLOYD AVENUE
(60' RICHT-OF-WAT)
~
.., ..,
1-------------
LDf UI -------------
LOf 19 1-------------
1-------------
t.Cf :o
,__ __ ----------
LOT 21
':-, ----·----------
BLOCK 9
1-------------
~: -------------L ___ ~,,. ---
JOB ttO. 157J9 0 0
20 10 0 U
ORIGINAi. SCAU:· I• • N
LEGEND
R[CO'V[R[I) M0NUMEkT U DESCA19 [D
SCT Rt8AR AHO YEUOW PLA~TIC
Ill • CAP $1.t..,PED: lS 1'606
$CT "4A,1. AkO 1111.t.SS Ur;
UAMP[D 1.5 15601
SrRCCI UCHT
SIC•
YALV[
TRArnc 51CHAL eox
BOUARD
UTIUJY PCU
CUY ANCMOR
CUT POlt
MtTtR
TRCC ,. OCC'Ckn1US
SHRU9/aUSH
TE\[PHONC P(DCSTAt.
Q.£.u,i.()ut
MAliHOI.£
■• DAit
Ct-<. 11 t<OB
CAf[ A1JCUST t!J.. 2013
... , 2 ., 2
0 .,,.
..,
II
+ ...
Ill
(II
AL TA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY
3279 & 3299 S. LOC•N ST
[NCI.E'NOOO, CO 80113
~ J•R ENGINEERING .--.... ..... .,
r.nm, :m-1'Hm •Ctadl ~ 1IHlll-t,al .... c...---
LEGAL DESCRIPTION,
t ilTS 30 AND 31, BLOCK II, ROS£ AIIDtnOH TO [ltCU:WOOO, COLORAIIO. COUNTY Of AR.&PAHOC.
SfAl[ Of C.OUlRAllO
TITLE COllallTIIENT NOTES,
THIS LANO SUR'IEY DOCS NOi COIISnTUTt A nn.t SORO! BY ..R EltCINEERINC, u.c 10 O(l[RIIIN[
DW>l[RSHF or TIIIS TRACT , 'IERIFY THE ot1CRtPnON SHOWN, VERIFY THE OOIAPATIBIUTY Of THIS
DESCAIPTIOH 11111H THAT or ADJACENT lRAC!S. OR 'IERIFY EASEMENTS Of R£CORD roR ~
INFORIIAnON RECARl)INC [AS£1.0ElHS. AICHI-Of-WAY OR Tltu: or R£CORD, ..R [NCIIIEERING, LtC
RCUCD UPON nn.t ORDER NO. K703!l0<407, ~El'ARID BY LANO mu: INSURANCC CORPORATION FOR
SHAIIOW CREtK HOll[S, LLC, A COLORADO Lillll[O UABIUTY CQl,IPANY, DATED AUWSI 2:Z. 2013 Al
5,00 P.11.
THE FOlLOY,1NG COIIIIENTS AR£ IN REGARDS TO THE ABO'IE-RErER£NCED TIil£ COl,lllllll[NT. THE
NUMBERS l'i OUR COIIIICNTS CORRESl'OHO TO THE NUl.l8ER!NC SYSlD.I USED IN TH£ TITLE
rol.llll!IIENT
ICIEDULI A
ffUI -
ltOTICD A80\IE.
:t-<I., ..R CNCINEERING, U.C 01D NOT C~At,1INE OR ADDRE SS THESE ITOIS.
~-TH[ LEGAL DtscRIPnON or Tl<[ LANO SUR'IEYED 15 SHOW>C PER THIS COIAMITll[NT. TO TH[
8[ST Of OUR KNO~CC ANO Bruer
SCHEDULE I • SECTION 1 CIIEQIIIIEIENTI)
..R [NCINCERING. U.C 010 NOT [XAMIIIE OR ADDRESS THESE ITEIIS.
SCHEDULE I -SECTION 2 <EXCEPTIONS>
ITDI _,.
t. VISIBLE AND APPARENT [VID(NC[ or RIGHTS OR CLAJIIS or PARTIES IN POSSESSION ARE
SHOWN HOIEOH TO THE BEST or OUR KNOWLEDGE ANO BEUEF
2. VISIIILC ANO APPAROH EVIO£NCE Of EASEIIENTS OR CLAIIIS Of EASEM£NTS All[ SHO'M<
HEJIEOH TO !HE BEST Of OUR KNOWl£l>GE ANO BELI[f.
3 VISIBLE ANO APPARCN! OISCREPANO[S. CONFLICTS °' BOUNDARY LINES. SHORTACES IN ARCA
AND ENCRDACHIIENTS AAE SHO'M< HOl£0N TO THC BEST or OUR KNDWLEOCE AND BCUCF
4.-7 ..R CNCINEERINC, U.C DID NOT CXA .. NE OR ADDRESS Tl<CSE ITOIS.
ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 34
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL M ERIDIAN
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLO RADO
[.l[A'$1'11M "'-
/ L ---·-i; -:; :;; i
::;
; I i ;; ::; ... ~ ..
,< .. ! ..
~ i ~ I f 1 i Ii .. Ir .. .. .. .. .. .. .. " L CIRM AVC
t ! ~
'-"~-~
~~ ........... -----+-==-.;=-~-----1--....1..-....L.-I
1--. I
GENERAL NOTES,
I DEFINITION: CERTIFY, CERTIFICA TIOH -A PROfESSIONAL'S Ol'INIOH BASED ON HIS OR 11ER
OB~VAnoN or COH01TIONS. KNOWl.tl)C(, tNrORIAATION ANO BEl.l[FS. IT IS EXPRESSLY
UNOERSTOOO Tl<AT THE Pl!Of[SSIOHAL'S CCRllflCATION Of A CONOl!ION'S CXISl(NCE REUE\'tS
NO OTIIER PARTY or ANY RESl'ONS181UTY OR OIIUGATION HE OR SHE HAS ACCEPTED BY
CONTRACT OR CUSTOIA.
2.
J.
..
PER C.R.S. 18-04-508, ANY PERSON MiO KNOWINGLY REUO'IES. Al.TEAS OR DEFACES AN Y
PUBLIC LAHD SURVEY MONUMENT OR LAND IION\JMENT OR ACCESSORY, CQl,lutTS A CLASS TWO
(2) IIISOtM[ANOR.
~ REFERENCES HEREON TO B001<S, PACES. IIAPS AND RECEPTION NUMBERS ARE PUBLIC
DOCUIIENTS Fll[O 1H lit[ RECORDS Of" ARAPAHO! COUNTY. COLORADO.
[AS(U[NTS AND PUBLIC DOCUMENTS SHOWN OR NOTED HEREOH wtRC EXAIIINED AS Ttl
LOCATION AND PIJRPOS( ANO O(R[ NOT [XAMtNEO AS TO RESERVATIONS. RESTRICTIONS,
CONDITlONS, OBUCATIONS, lERMS. OR AS TO THE Rte>tl TO CRANT THE SAU[.
5. BURIED UDUTI[S AHO/OR PIP[UN[S AR[ SHOWN PER VISIBLE AND APPARCN! SURFACE
EVIDENCE OR RECORD ORA-CS Of THE CONSTRUCTED UTILITY UNCS. 1F MORE ACCURAlE
LOCAll0NS or UNOEllCROUt<ll ununrs AA[ R[OU IREO. 1HE UTILITY 'MU. HAvt TO BE '/ERIFl[D
SY Fl[LD POTHOLING. .JI CNCIN[[RING, U.C N<D THE SURvtYOR Of RCCORO SHAU. NOT BC
UA8LE FOR THE LOCATION 0. OR 111[ FA.lLURE TO ltOIE THE LOCATION or NON-V1St8LE
UTILITIES.
6. THE BASIS Of BEARINGS IS THE W!;ST RIGHT-Of"-WAY UN[ OF SOOTH LOGAN STRm.
IIONUIICNTtD AS SHO..,. 11EREON. AND ASSUMED TO BEAR SOO"OO"OO"W
7 THE LAST Fl[Ul INSPECTION Of THIS Sil[ WAS ON S(PTEIISER 16, 20tJ.
8. P£R C.R.S. Jll-51-1011. •,.u, UNEAL UNITS D£P1Cl[D ON THIS LAND SUR'IEY PLAT AA[ U.S.
SURvtY rtrr. ONE IICTE/1 COUALS 39.37/12 U.S. SURVEY fECT, EXACllY ACCORDING TO TH£
NATIONAL INSTITUIE or STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY.
9. THIS Sil[ IS NOT VIITHII-I A OCSIGHATICD F.[.11 .A. FLDODPI.AIN, AS DETtRMIN[O 8Y 111[ nooo
INSURANCE RAil: IIAP FOR AR.&PAliO( COUNTY, COLORADO, 11.&P NUIIBCR 08005C016tK,
R[VISEO DAT[ OCCEll8CR 17. 2010. IHE SUB..CCT PRDPCRTY IS LOCAl[D 1H fLOOO ZONE
·x-uNSHAOED", AREAS 0ETERUINCD TO 8[ OUTSIDC THE ~-YEAR Fl.000 PLAIN.
10. THE BUII.OING rOOlPfllNT COHTAINS A CALCULATED AREA or U56 S0UAR£ r[[T.
It ~ TIES 10 RECORD TITILE UNES rRCM THC BUILDING CORNERS OR OTHER 1t,1PRO\IEMENTS
SHOWN HEREON ARE PCRP[N01CUI.AR 10 THC RECORD nTLE LINC.
12. THERE ARE NO OESIGNATtO PARKING AREAS ON IHE S\18..CC! PROPERTY
lJ. THIS SITE CONTAINS A CALCULAl[O AREA or 6,25.l SQUARE rEET OR 0.1•35 ACRE.
14. CONTOURS SHO..,. HEREON ARE BASED ON ASSUMED DA TUY .
THERE IS NO \'ISISU: (VID(NCE Tl<AT IHE SUBJECT PROPCRTY IS BEING USED AS A SOLID
WASTE DUMP, SUMP OR LANDfl lL ~ ENCINEERINC, U.C Dl0 NO! RESEARCH Tl<E HISTORIC USE
or Tl<IS Silt.
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT,
IHIS ALTA/ACSM I.ANO TITLE SURVEY WAS PREP ARCD FOR THE CXCLUSl'IE USE or TH[ P(/ISOH,
PERSONS OR CHnTY NAMED IN Tl<E STATOl[NT H[A[ON. THIS STATEM[NI DOES NOT [XTEND TO AN Y
UNNAMED PERSON OR EltllTY -.,THOUT AN EXPRESS RESTATE\1£NT BY Tl<t SURVEYOR NAl,IING SUCH
PEl<SON OR [NnTY
TO SHADOW CREE K 1101AES. U.C. A COLORADO LIUITED LIAl!IUTY COIIPANY ANO TO LAND nTILC
l'ISURANCE CORPOIIAllON,
THIS IS TO CERTIFY Tl<AT THI S MAP OR PLAT ANO THE SUR\l[Y ON "'11CH IT IS BASED '111:RE UAOE IN
ACCDNDAACC Wlltt IHE 2011 IIIIOUUII SIANDARO DETAIL RtOUIREMCNTS FOIi Al.!A/ACSII LANO llTU:
SURvtYS, JOINTLY ESTABUSHCD AND MlOPl[D BY ALTA ANO N5PS, ANO INCLUDES ITEIIS 1, 2. 3. 4, 5.
7(b), B. 9. 11(a). 11[b), IJ. 14 . 18, AND 19 or TASU: A TH£RCOf THC nElll WORK WAS COIAPllTED
ON AUCUSI 14, 2013. f)AI[ or MAP OR PLAT·~~
.,.q.~~ ... !'c"'
( ~~ _:;.,•[-:ti 0 .•• ':-
~~J.~.~°!.~)1
~t,11,~~
KtNNEtH b. UXREA. PRoFtSSIONXL LANO SOA'a.TOR ------
COLORADO P.L S. ND. 15606
FOR ANO ON BEHAL/" or SI CNCINEERINC, U.C
[WAI L: KBAKEROJIENCINE[lftNC.COII
P[R C.R.$. 13-80-105, YOU UUST COIAMENCE ANY U:GAL ACnON BASCO \!PON AN Y DEFECT IN THIS
SURVCY Y,IIHIN THRE£ Y[ARS AFl[R ~ FlRST OISCOll[R SUCH DEFECT IN 110 [\/ENT MAY ANY
ACTION BASCO UPON ANY 0EfECT IN THII 11/R\IEY BE COIAMCNCED MORE THAN T!;N >!;A.RS rROII IHC
DA Tt or !HE CCRnACA TIOII Sl<O'M< HEREON. ..R ENCIN[EJ!INC, LlC ANO/OR THE SUR'IEYOR Of RECORO SH= NOT BE LI.lllLE fOR IIORE THAN THE tl!ST Of THIS SURVCY AN D THEN ONLY TO THE CUEN!
SPtancAU. y SHOWN HEREON OR IN OUR Fl1..[ BY SIGHCD AUTl<OlllZAnON. ACC(P!ANCE AND/OR USE
Of THIS INSTRUMENT fOR ANY PUl!POSE CONSTITUl[S AC11[£11 [NT BY THE CLJ[N! TO AU. TERUS
STATED HER£0N.
D'llltt 8'( S..U
~ ··•20· OA1t SEPl£118ER 17, 2013
.a, NO. 15739.00
ALTA/ACSM LAN D Till.£ SUR~Y
J~5 S. L~N< ST
ENCLEWOOO. CO MIil
<§al J•R ENGINEERING ·--~-•Ob,m!IIIIII--• ~oa------•--•9•P••
•
I
I
I
or •
-----
,vf .,J
--
e .,
' I ---1 -----1
-----------------------
nJ_:, Utih,IJ. r._)£~..,_!.I'.)_,,.
_QC-'\ :3
,__ ____________ _
-------------
I L ______ _ --
"' I
I
I
I
I
I
'~
I
I .,,
ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 34
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO
,__ ____ ----
!AST FUJYI> AV!NU!
(60' RICHr-or --.;.l) .., ..,
LCT let • I
/---·-
-------------
tJMI, Bf S..M
JOB NO 15739 00
~ -~ .r
:o 10 0 20
ORIGIN Al SCA\£ 1' • 20·
LEGEND
R(COvtRto t10NVu (Nf AS O(SCR16[t) Ii
REC O~Rto l l REBAR ■
SCT A(BAR Ario ,ruow PLASnc • CAP STA t,tP(O LS 1'!1606
S(T N~L ANO ~ASS TAC Ji Sf,1,UPCO LS 1~06
S1'PtET llGHf •
SIGN -
VAL\'( ..
~ .. me sitr1AL eox
8a.LARO +
unu TT POU: 0
CUT AUCHOR .
CUY POL£
U(r[R Cl
Tf.ft£ .. DECIDUOUS t!:
SHll'VB/8V'SH 9
TtLEPHOHE Pt0E$UL
CU:AII-OUT ~
'-«AUHOI..E -11
AlTA/A CSM LAND TITLE SURVEY
CHk er +-,08
C.t.lt SEPTEl.18ER 17. 2013
or 2
3:!6 fi, S. Lt,e.At, 5,T
[ti ,U:..000, ~Q 6''13
•
, .
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
DATE: May 19, 2014 AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: Ordinance Approving rezoning
11 a i 3265-3299 South Logan Street from R-1-C to
the "3299 South Logan Street Residences"
Planned Unit Development (PUD}
INITIATED BY: STAFF SOURCE: Brook Bell, Planner II
Shadow Creek Homes, LLC
Toby Terhune
P.O. Box 350909
Westminster, Colorado 80031
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
There has been no previous Council action concerning the proposed rezoning request.
PREVIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the proposed PUD at a Public Hearing conducted on
April 22, 2014. The Commission considered testimony and voted 9-0 to forward the proposed "3299 South
Logan Street Residences" PUD to City Council with a favorable recommendation for approval.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends adoption of an ordinance approving the proposed 3299 South Logan Street Residences
PUD and setting June 2, 2014 as the date for the Public Hearing to consider public testimony on the
proposed zoning change.
BACKGROUND
The subject property of this PUD is located at the northwest corner of South Logan Street and East Floyd
Avenue. land to the north, south, and east of the subject property is zoned R-1-C Single Unit Residential
District. land directly to the west of the subject property is zoned MU-R-3-B NPO Mixed Use Medium to
High Density Residential and Limited Office District with a Neighborhood Preservation Overlay. Properties
to the west and southwest of subject property contain several multi-unit apartment buildings.
The property at 3299 South Logan contains an existing building that was originally a church until 1967
when the Englewood Shrine Club purchased the building and obtained a variance to use it for their
functions. The Shrine Club's organization thrived for many years; however, more recently the declining
membership in the Englewood Shrine Club led to the members' decision to sell the building .
•
The variance granted to the Englewood Shrine Club in 1967 was for a dub use only with additional
conditions that narrowly defined the proposed use. With the narrowly defined variance, and the lack of
'I
enough land area to allow other permitted uses (24,000 s.f. minimum), the property had difficulty attracting
prospective buyers or tenants to reoccupy the building. -
After some time on the market, Shadow Creek Homes, LLC purchased the Shrine Club property in 2013.
Mr. Terhune's company also purchased the house at 3265 South Logan Street directly north of the Shrine
Club property. Between the two properties, there is enough land area to meet the minimum threshold (one-
half acre) to apply for a PUD rezoning that would allow for an enhanced residential development
PUD OVERVIEW
A Planned Unit Development establishes specific zoning and site planning criteria to meet the needs of a
specific development proposal that may not be accommodated within existing zoning development
regulations . PUDs provide the opportunity for unified development control for multiple properties or
multiple uses.
The proposed 3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD will allow a maximum of three (3) one-unit
dwellings, one (1) two-unit dwelling, and three (3) detached accessory structures above garages that may
be used as dwelling units. The majority of the parking would be in detached garages with an additional
surface parking pad provided for each detached accessory structure. All of the designated parking is
accessed from the alley, and meets the City's parking regulations.
The two proposed new homes are setback approximately 20 feet from South Logan Street to be
compatible with the existing structures to the north and south. The Site Plan includes rear yard spaces with
patios between the residential uses and garages. The landscape Plan delineates landscaping in the public A
right-of-way, as w ell as front and rear yards. All new utilities are to be placed underground between th e W
garages and the residences. A Minor Subdivision application to reconfigure the lots has been submitted,
and will be reviewed administratively if th e PUD application is approved.
Architectural Character: The proposed PUD will be urban in character and respect the pedestrian scale of
the neighborhood. The PUD contains architectural character standards that require a mix of pattern and
col or changes, a minimum masonry requirement or defined front porches, and a requirement that building
entries be clearly defined with architectural elements. The exterior materials and colors of the detached
accessory structure are required to compliment the overall character of the principal dwelling. Provisions for
roof pitches and flat roofs are also included. It should be noted that the conceptual building footprint
shown on the Site Plan and the proposed building elevations are subject to change; however, any changes
would have to meet the design standards and guidelines of the PUD.
Permitted Uses: The subject property currently lies within the R-1 -C Single Unit Residential District. The
existing R-1-C Zone District allows primarily residential and public/institutional uses. The proposed PUD
District Plan includes a table of allowed uses that lists the primary permitted residen tial and
public/institutional uses . It should be noted that the proposed table of allowed uses matches the permitted
uses of the R-1-C Zone District with the exception of the two-unit dwelling proposed for the Shr ine Club
building and the (3} detached accessory structures over the garages.
Dimensional Standards: The following table provides a comparison of dimensional requirements for
principal structures between the property's existing R·l-C zone classification and the proposed PUD.
•
•
•
•
0Mlff~--:•~~ef.lllU&.tE-8Sl0.8Al!f6 cr.i.rrmr&1ENIS:mit"100N€IVA1>~ffllll}~
. -.,. ~ -~ II --~;
m --
R-1-C District (Existing Zoning)
One-Unit 6,000 None 40
Dwelling
One-Unit ~500 None 35
Dwelling on a
Small Lot
All Other 24,000 None 40
Allowed Uses
3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD (New Zoning)
Existing One-Unit
Dwelling (Lot 1 )
One-Unit
Dwelling (Lots 2
and 3)
Existing Building
(Two-Unit
Dwelling Lots 4
and 5)
All Other
Allowed Uses
4,000
4,500
3,500
24,000
None 60
None so
None 60
None 40
50
37
200
33
37
Lot 4
37
Lot 5
29
200
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
25
25
25
15 to
Porch
20 to
Hous
e
15 to
Porch
20 to
Hous
e
15 to
Porch
20 to
Hous
e
25
5
3
25
North
2.3
South
3
3
North
10
South
0
25
20
20
25
45 I
45
50
25
Residential Density: The proposed 3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD would permit a maximum of
8 dwelling units on the 0.5 acre property (including the maximum permitted 3 secondary suites above the
garages). This represents a maximum density of 16 dwelling units per acre ( d.u./ac.). For comparison
purposes, some properties to the west and southwest of the subject property (across the alley) contain
multi-unit apartment buildings with densities of between 50 d.u.jac. and 60 d.u.fac .
Setbacks: A setback is the minimum distance a structure must be located from a property line. The
proposed PUD setbacks for principal structures are shown in the table of Dimensional Requirements above. •
The proposed setbacks for rear garages and detached accessory structures are as follows.
Lot 1 (Existing Garage) Lots 2, 3, & 4 Lot 5
(3-Car Garage & Detached
Accessory Structure above)
Side Setback North 2.3' North 1' 3'
South 3' South 9'
Rear Setback 5.9' 6' 6'
It should be noted that the detached accessory structures above the garages are limited to 400 square feet
of interior space. This is the size of approximately two car bays in the garage below with an option to add
an exterior patio over the third bay of the garage.
Building Height: The maximum building heights in the PUD are based on the average elevation of the
finished grade at the corners of the building to the highest point of the building or structure. The maximum
allowed PUD building height for all uses is 32 feet; the maximum allowed height for garages without a
detached accessory structure is 16 feet.
Bulk Plane: The bulk plane regulates building mass and is a function of required setbacks and maximum
building height for each type of use. The proposed PUD states that any new construction within the PUD
shall meet the bulk plane shown on Sheet 04 of the PUD drawings.
The bulk plane depicted on Sheet 04 of the PUD shows the starting point of the 45 degree bulk plane •
starting at 16' above grade rather than the 12' above grade requirement in the Unified Development Code
{UDC). This represents a 33% increase in bulk plane height com pared to the current UDC requirement For
comparison purposes, the City of Denver's bulk plane for urban houses begins at 17' above grade.
Regardless of bulk plane requirements, the maximum height for structures in the proposed PUD is still
limited to the 3 2' maximum height of the R-1-C Zone District.
Parking: The UDC requires 2 parking spaces for each single-unit dwelling and 1.5 parking spaces for each
multi-unit dwelling. The proposed PUD requires 2 p arking spaces for each single-unit dwelling and 2 parking
spaces for each multi-unit dwelling, p l us 1 parking space for each detached accessory structure. The PUD
provides an option for a third garage bay/parking space for Lots 2, 3, and 4; if this option is chosen, there
will be an additional parking space for either the primary residence or the detached accessory structure. It
should be noted that the proposed PUD has over 240 lineal feet of street frontage that permits on-street
parking; this translates to approximately 10 potential on-street parking spaces fronting the proposed PUD
site.
Traffic: The Public Works Department reviewed the proposed PUD request for potential impacts. Public
Works concluded that a traffic impact study was not required due to the slight increase in traffic over the
existing permitted density. Additionally, the Logan Street and Floyd Avenue intersection is signalized, which
increases control of traffic movements in the vicinity of the PUD.
Signage: The proposed PUD will follow the standard signage regulations of the UDC for the R-1 -C Zone
District.
Landscaping: The UDC requi res that a minimum of 40% of a property be landscaped in the R-1-C Zone
District The proposed PUD also requires that 40% of the PUD property be landscaped, as well as meeting
•
•
all other landscape requirements for the R-1-C Zone District. Sheet 07 of the PUD provides more detail on
the landscape plan.
Screening and Fencing: The proposed PUD will follow the standard screening and fencing regulations of
the UDC for the R-1-C Zone District.
Grading and Drainage: The proposed Grading and Drainage Plan was acceptable to the City's Public
Works Department.
Park Dedication: The subdivision regulations of the UDC require the dedication of park land or payment
of a fee in lieu of dedication for all residential developments. The proposed Logan Street development will
be required to pay a fee in lieu of dedication for the 4 to 7 new residences. This translates to a fee in lieu of
dedication amount of between$ 1,690 and$ 3,070.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS
The UDC requires that Council shall only approve a proposed PUD if it finds that the proposed
development complies with all applicable use, development, and design standards that are not otherwise
modified or waived according to the rezoning approval; and the proposed rezoning meets one of the
following criteria:
a. That the proposed development will exceed the development quality standards, levels of public amenities,
or levels of design innovation otherwise applicable under this Title, and would not be possible or
practicable under a standard zone district with conditional uses or with a reasonable number of Zoning
Variances or Administrative Adjustments; or
The proposed PUD will exceed the development quality standards required by the UDC for residential
development as follows:
• The proposed PUD will exceed the current UDC quality standards by specifying a variety of
materials on all facades of the building; by calling for a minimum masonry percentage or
defined porch on the front facade; and by requiring rear loaded garages.
• The PUD contains architectural character standards that require a mix of pattern and color
changes, and a requirement that building entries be clearly defined with architectural elements.
Provisions for roof pitches and flat roofs are also included in the PUD.
b. That the property cannot be developed, or that no reasonable economic use of the property can be
achieved, under the existing zoning, even through the use of conditional uses or a reasonable number of
Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjustments.
As stated previously, the variance granted to the Englewood Shrine Club in 1967 was for a club use only.
The 1967 variance contained conditions that narrowly defined the permitted use. With the narrowly
defined variance, and the lack of enough land area to allow other permitted uses (24,000 s.f. minimum), the
property has had difficulty attracting prospective buyers or viable tenants to reoccupy the building.
Redevelopment of the site was only made possible with the addition of the property at 3265 S. Logan St.,
which created a site large enough to propose a PUD. The site is still not large enough to accommodate any
other non-residential use.
In addition to the two Planned Unit Development considerations above, the UDC requires that a property
rezoned to PUD must not have a significant negative impact on those properties surrounding the rezoned •
area and that the general public health, safety and welfare of the community are protected. Staff has
reviewed the PUD request and found the following:
• The PUD application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Unified Development
Code.
• The application is consistent with adopted and generally accepted standards of development in the
City.
• The Public Works Department reviewed the proposed PUD request and concluded that there were
not significant traffic impacts with this minor increase in permitted density.
• The rezoned property will not have a significant negative impact on those properties surrounding
the rezoned area and the general public health, safety and welfare of the community are protected.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The proposed 3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD will generate a one-time building use tax of about
$26,000 based on a construction cost of approximately $1.5 million. The project would also generate a
one-time park dedication fee-in-lieu of between $ 1,690 and $ 3,070 depending on whether the detached
accessory units are constructed.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Planning Commission Staff Report including Exhibits B -C (April 22, 2014)
Planning Commission Minutes (April 22, 2014)
Planning Commission Findings of Fact
Bill for Ordinance
•
•
•
{'
C T y 0 F ENGLEWOOD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO:
THRU:
Planning and Zoning Commission
Chris Neubecker, Senior Planner/
Alan White, Community Development Director ✓
Brook Bell, Planner II ✓ FROM:
DATE: April 22, 2014
SUBJECT: Case ZON2014-001 -Public Hearing
3299 South Logan Street Residences Planned Unit Development
APPLICANT:
Shadow Creek Homes, LLC
Toby Terhune
P.O. Box 350909
Westminster, Colorado 80031
PROPERTY OWNER:
Shadow Creek Homes, LLC
Toby Terhune
P.O. Box 350909
Westminster, Colorado 80031
PROPERTY ADDRESSES:
3265-3299 South Logan Street
REQUEST:
The applicant has submitted an application to rezone the properties above from R-1-C
Single Unit Residential District {Small Lot Size) to the 3299 South Logan Street Residences
Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed PUD would allow for a maximum of
three {3) one-unit dwellings, one (1) two-unit dwelling, and three (3) detached accessory
structures above garages that may be used as dwelling units. ·
RECOMMENDATION:
Case ZON2014-001: The Department of Community Development recommends that the
Planning and Zoning Commission review the 3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD
request and forward a favorable recommendation for approval to City Council.
1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, Colorado 80110 PHONE 303-762-2342 FAX 303-783-6895
www englewoodgov.org
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS:
3265 South Logan Street: Lots 30-31 Block 8 Rose Addition
3299 South Logan Street: Lots 25-29 Block 8 Rose Addition
EXISTING ZONE DISTRICT:
R-1-C Single Unit Residential District (Small Lot Size)
PROPERTY LOCATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USE:
The subject property of this PUD is located at the northwest corner of South Logan Street
and East Floyd Avenue. Land to the north, south, and east of the subject property is zoned
R-1-C Single Unit Residential District. Land directly to the west of the subject property is
zoned MU-R-3-8 NPO Mixed Use Medium to High Density Residential and Limited Office
Dis trict wi t h a Neigh b orhood Pre servation O ve rlay. Properties to the west and southwest of
subject property contain several multi-unit apartment buildings.
PUD PROCEDURE:
Rezoning to a PUD requires the applicant to have a pre-application meeting with staff, and
a neighborhood meeting with owners and neighbors located within 1,000 feet of the
proposed PUD. After the neighborhood meeting a formal application is submitted to the
City and reviewed by City departments and other affected outside agencies. A public
hearing is held before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If the PUD
is approved there is a 30 day re ferendum time period before becoming effective.
•
BACKGROUND: -
The Planned Unit Development is a rezoning process that establishes specific zoning and
site planning criteria to meet the needs of a specific development proposal that may not be
accommodated within existing zoning development regulations. A PUD rezoning provides
the opportunity for unified development control for multiple properties or multiple uses.
The property at 3299 South Logan contains an existing building that was originally a church
until 1967 when the Englewood Shrine Club purchased the building and obtained a
variance to use it for their functions. The Shrine Club's organization thrived for many years;
however, more recently the declining membership in the Englewood Shrine Club led to the
members' decision to sell the building.
The variance granted to the Englewood Shrine Club in 1967 was for a club use only with
additional conditions that narrowly defined the proposed use. With the narrowly defined
variance, and the lack of enough land area to allow other permitted uses (24,000 s.f.
minimum), the property had difficulty attracting prospective buyers or tenants to reoccupy
the building.
After some time on the market, Shadow Creek Homes, LLC purchased the Shrine Club
property in 2013. Mr. Terhune's company also purchased the house at 3265 South Logan
Street directly north of the Shrine Club property. Between the two properties, there is
enough land area to meet the m inimum threshold (one-half acre) to apply for a PUD
rezoning that would allow for an enhanced residential development. •
2
•
•
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARY:
Pursuant to the PUD procedure, the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on
November 7, 2013, prior to submitting the application for a PUD rezoning on February 13,
2014. Notice of the pre-application meeting was mailed to property owners and occupants
of property within 1000 feet of the site. Neighborhood meeting notes are attached to this
report (See Exhibit 8). Significant changes were made to the final PUD to address
neighborhood comments.
CITY DEPARTMENT AND DIVISION REVIEW:
The Logan Street Residences PUD and subsequent revisions were reviewed by the City's
Development Review Team (ORT) on February 25th and April l5 1 of 2014. Identified issues
were addressed by the applicant and the final Logan Street Residences PUD was submitted
on April 9, 2014.
PUD OVERVIEW:
The proposed 3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD will allow a maximum of three (3)
one-unit dwellings, one ( 1) two-unit dwelling, and three (3) detached accessory structures
above garages that may be used as dwelling units. The majority of the parking would be in
detached garages with an additional surface parking pad provided for each detached
accessory structure. All of the designated parking is accessed from the alley, and meets the
City's parking regulations .
The two proposed new homes are setback approximately 20 feet from South Logan Street
to be compatible with the existing structures to the north and south. The Site Plan includes
rear yard spaces with patios between the residential uses and garages. The Landscape Plan
delineates landscaping in the public right-of-way, as well as front and rear yards. All new
utilities are to be placed underground between the garages and the residences. A Minor
Subdivision application to reconfigure the lots has been submitted, and will be approved
administratively if the PUD application is approved.
Architectural Character: The proposed PUD will be urban in character and respect the
pedestrian scale of the neighborhood. The PUD contains architectural character standards
that require a mix of pattern and color changes, a minimum masonry requirement or
defined front porches, and a requirement that building entries be clearly defined with
architectural elements. The exterior materials and colors of the detached accessory
structure are required to compliment the overall character of the principal dwelling.
Provisions for roof pitches and flat roofs are also included. It should be noted that the
conceptual building footprint shown on the Site Plan and the proposed building elevations
are subject to change; however, any changes would have to meet the design standards and
guidelines of the PUD.
Permitted Uses: The subject property currently lies within the R-1 •C Single Unit Residential
District. The existing R-l·C Zone District allows primarily residential and public/institutional
uses. The proposed PUD District Plan includes a table of allowed uses that lists the primary
permitted residential and public/institutional uses. It should be noted that the proposed
3
table of allowed uses matches the permitted uses of the R-1-C Zone District with the
exception of the two-unit dwelling proposed for the Shrine Club building and the (3) •
detached accessory structures over the garages.
Dimensional Standards: The following table provides a comparison of dimensional
requirements for principal structures between the property's existing R-1-C zone
classification and the proposed PUD.
.. o2, ..
'
R-1-C District (Existing z,ming)
One -Unit Dwelling 6,000 None 40 50 32 25 5 20
One-Unit 4,500 None 35 37 32 25 3 20
Dwelling on a
Small Lot
All Other 24,000 None 40 200 32 25 25 25
Allowed Us es
3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD (New Zoning)
15 lo North
Existing One-Unit 4,000 None 60 33 32 Porch 2.3 45 Dwelling (Lot 1) 20 lo South
House 3
One-Unit Dwelling 4,500 None 50 37 32 15 to 3 45
(Lots 2 and 3) Porch
20to
House
Existing Building Lot4 15 to North
37 Porch 10 (Two-Unit Dwelling 3,500 None 60 Lots 32 20 to South 50
Lots 4 and 5) 29 House 0
All Other 24,000 None 40 200 32 25 25 25
Allowed Uses
Residential Density: The proposed 3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD would
permit a maximum of 8 dwelling units on the 0.5 acre property (including the maximum
permitted 3 secondary suites above the garages). This represents a maximum density of 16
dwelling units per acre (d.u./ac.). For comparison purposes, some properties to the west
and southwest of subject property (across the alley) contain multi-unit apartment buildings
with densities of between 50 d .u./ac. and 60 d .u.jac.
Setbacks: A setback is the minimum distance a structure must be located from a property
line. The proposed PUD setbacks for principal structures are shown in the table of
4
•
•
• Dimensional Requirements above. The proposed setbacks for rear garages and detached
accessory structures are as follows .
Lot 1 (Existing Garage) Lots 2, 3, & 4 Lot 5
(3-Car Garage & Detached
Accessory Structure above)
Side Setback North 2.3' North 1' 3'
South 3' South 9'
Rear Setback 5.9' 6' 6'
It should be noted that the detached accessory structures above the garages are limited to
400 square feet of interior space. This is the size of approximately two car bays in the
garage below with an option to add an exterior patio over the third bay of the garage.
Building Height: The maximum building heights in the PUD are based on the average
elevation of the finished grade at the corners of the building to the highest point of the
building or structure. The maximum allowed PUD building height for all uses is 32 feet; the
maximum allowed height for garages without a detached accessory structure is 16 feet.
Bulk Plane: The bulk plane regulates building mass and is a function of required setbacks
and maximum building height for each type of use. The proposed PUD states that any new
construction within the PUD shall meet the bulk plane shown on Sheet 04 of the PUD
drawings.
The bulk plane depicted on Sheet 04 of the PUD shows the starting point of the 45 degree
bulk plane starting at 16' above grade rather than the 12' above grade requirement in the
Unified Development Code (UDC). This represents a 33% increase in bulk plane height
compared to the current UDC requirement. For comparison purposes, the City of Denver's
bulk plane for urban houses begins at 17' above grade. Regardless of bulk plane
requirements, the maximum height for structures in the proposed PUD is still limited to the
32' maximum height of the R-1-C Zone District.
Parking: The UDC requires 2 parking spaces for each single-unit dwelling and 1.5 parking
spaces for each multi-unit dwelling. The proposed PUD requires 2 parking spaces for each
single-unit dwelling and 2 parking spaces for each multi-unit dwelling, plus 1 parking space
for each detached accessory structure. The PUD provides an option for a th ird garage
bay/parking space for Lots 2, 3, and 4; if this option is chosen, there will be an additional
parking space for either the primary residence or the detached accessory structure. It
should be noted that the proposed PUD has over 240 lineal feet of street frontage that
permits on-street parking; this translates to approximately 10 potential on-street parking
spaces fronting the proposed PUD site.
Traffic: The Public Works Department reviewed the proposed PUD request for potential
impacts. Public Works concluded that a traffic impact study was not required due to the
sl ight increase in traffic over the existing permitted density. Additionally, the Logan Street
5
and Floyd Avenue intersection is signalized, which increases control of traffic movements in
the vicinity of the PUD. •
Signage: The proposed PUD will follow the standard signage regulations of the UDC for
the R-1-C Zone District.
landscaping: The UDC requires that a minimum of 40% of a property be landscaped in
the R-1-C Zone District. The proposed PUD also requires that 40% of the PUD property be
landscaped, as well as meeting all other landscape requirements for the R-1-C Zone District.
Sheet 07 of the PUD provides more detail on the landscape plan.
Screening and Fencing: The proposed PUD will follow the standard screening and fencing
regulations of the UDC for the R-1-C Zone District.
Grading and Drainage: The proposed Grading and Drainage Plan was acceptable to the
City's Public Works Department.
Utilities: The proposed Utilities Plan was reviewed and approved by the City's Utilities
Department.
Park Dedication: The subdivision regulations of the UDC require the dedication of park
land or payment of a fee in lieu of dedication for all residential developments. The
proposed Logan Street development will be required to pay a fee in lieu of dedication for
the 4 to 7 new residences. This translates to a fee in lieu of dedication amount of between •
$ 1,690 and$ 3,070.
PUD SUMMARY:
The proposed 3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD has been reviewed by the City's
Development Review Team (ORT) and issues identified by the DRT were addressed by the
applicant. The PUD documents are complete and no additional conditions of approval are
recommended at this time. Therefore, the Community Development Department
recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission review the 3299 South Logan
Street Residences PUD request and forward a favorable recommendation for approval to
City Council.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS:
The Planning and Zoning Commission is to review 3299 South Logan Street Residences
PUD request, and following the public hearing, may recommend that the Council approve,
deny, or approve the rezoning with conditions. In its review of the application, the
Commission's recommendations should include findings on each of the following points:
1. The application is or is not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and this Title
(UDC).
The 3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD conforms to the Comprehensive Plan
strategy of redevelopment. The Comprehensive Plan states, "Englewood residents •
6
• will benefit from the new opportunities for housing, shopping, and entertainment
these new developments will bring to the City". The proposed PUD supports the
following Comprehensive Plan Housing Goal #1: "Promote a balance mix of
housing opportunities serving the needs of all current and future Englewood
citizens."
Additionally the PUD document states: "This PUD conforms to the City of
Englewood's Comprehensive Plan by offering a balanced mix of housing
opportunities serving the needs of current and future Englewood residents, by
improving the quality of the City's existing housing stock, and by addressing the
current shortage of housing priced at the high-end of the housing market in the City
of Englewood."
The development will complement the proposed Broadway/Acoma Lofts project by
offering an alternative for-sale product, while encouraging redevelopment along the
Broadway corridor. The vacant 6,000 square foot Shrine Club building currently
occupying the property has not attracted viable tenants or uses. The proposed PUD
addresses the City's 3-part strategy outlined in the 2003 Englewood Comprehensive
Plan for Growth and Development in the City; Revitalization, Redevelopment and
Reinvention.
The project will bring new life into the area and provide a unique housing option for
residents near the Broadway corridor. The project takes advantage of existing
infrastructure and proximity to retail uses, while reinvesting in an established
residential neighborhood. The additional residents will take advantage of the existing
amenities in the neighborhood and generate tax revenue that will benefit programs
and services provided by the City of Englewood. The increased tax revenue will also
benefit other taxing entities, most notably the School District.
2. The application is or is not consistent with adopted and generally accepted standards of
development in the City.
The 3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD is consistent with adopted and
generally accepted development standards established by the City of Englewood.
The application was reviewed by the City's Development Review Team (ORT) and
all comments were addressed by the applicant.
3. The application is or is not substantially consistent with the goals, objectives, design
guidelines, policies and any other ordinance, law, or requirement of the City.
The 3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD is substantially consistent with the
goals, objectives, design guidelines, policies, and other ordinances, laws and
requirements of the City.
The UDC requires that the review or decision making body shall only approve a proposed
PUD if it finds that the proposed development complies with all applicable use,
7
development, and design standards set forth in the UDC that are not otherwise modified or
waived according to the rezoning approval; and the proposed rezoning meets one of the •
following criteria:
a. That the proposed development will exceed the development quality standards, levels of
public amenities, or levels of design innovation otherwise applicable under this Title, and
would not be possible or practicable under a standard zone district with conditional uses
or with a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjustments; or
The proposed PUD will exceed the development quality standards required by the UDC
for residential development as follows:
• The proposed PUD will exceed the current UDC quality standards by specifying
a variety of materials on all facades of the building; by calling for a minimum
masonry percentage or defined porch on the front fai;ade; and by requiring rear
loaded garages.
• The PUD contains architectural character standards that require a mix of pattern
and color changes, and a requirement that building entries be clearly defined
with architectural elements. Provisions for roof pitches and flat roofs are also
included in the PUD.
b. That the property cannot be developed, or that no reasonable economic use of the
property can be achieved, under the existing zoning, even through the use of conditional •
uses or a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjustments.
As stated previously, the variance granted to the Englewood Shrine Club in 1967 was
for a club use only. The 1967 variance contained conditions that narrowly defined the
permitted use. With the narrowly defined variance, and the lack of enough land area to
allow other permitted uses {24,000 s.f. minimum), the property has had difficulty
attracting prospective buyers or viable tenants to reoccupy the building.
Redevelopment of the site was only made possible with the addition of the property at
3265 S. Logan St., which created a site large enough to propose a PUD. The site is still
not large enough to accommodate any other non-residential use.
In addition to the two Planned Unit Development considerations above, the UDC requires
that a property rezoned to PUD must not have a significant negative impact on those
properties surrounding the rezoned area and that the general public health, safety and
welfare of the community are protected. Staff has reviewed the PUD request and found the
following:
• The PUD application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and the
Unified Development Code.
• The application is consistent with adopted and generally accepted standards of
development in the City.
8
•
• • The Public Works Department reviewed the proposed PUD request and concluded
that there were not significant traffic impacts with this minor increase in permitted
density.
• The rezoned property will not have a significant negative impact on those properties
surrounding the rezoned area and the general public health, safety and welfare of
the community are protected.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A: 3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD
Exhibit B: Neighborhood Meeting Summary -November 7, 2013
Exhibit C: Email from Lila & Leonard Albertson -November 14, 2013
9
• Englewood Shrine Club PUD
Neighborhood Meeting
3299 South Logan Street
November 7, 2013
Attendees: Approximately 1 7-25 (some attendees did not sign-in)
Applicant Presentation
EXHIBIT B
1. Toby Terhune of Shadow Creek Homes stated that has been building homes in the
Denver metro area since 1982 with over 200 completed to date. In 2007 he formed
Shadow Creek Homes and is looking forward to doing an infill project in the City of
Englewood. He indicated that the Shrine Club building was originally a church until
1967 when the Englewood Shrine Club purchased the building and obtained a variance
to use it for their functions. The building has been on the market for the past five years
and Shadow Creek Homes recently purchased and closed on the property. Mr.
Terhune's company also purchased the house directly north of the Shrine Club
property.
2. Mr. Terhune described the proposed development which includes:
• Renovation of the existing Shrine Club building into four higher end apartment lofts.
• On the remainder of the property, the construction of four new 2,000 to 2,500
square foot cottage homes.
1
• Each of the four cottage homes would include a detached garage with the possibility
of a flexible living space above the garage. The flexible living space could be a
workspace for the resident of the larger home in front, a mother-in-law apartment, or
a separate rental unit.
3. Public Comment
The attendees asked questions and provided comments as follows . The applicant
responded to the questions and provided the following answers (in italics):
•
•
.
•
•
.
Are you turning the Shrine Club building into offices? No, the proposal is for four
higher end apartment lofts.
Tell me more about the rental units above the detached garages for the cottages?
The detached garages with the flexible living space above would be under the same
ownership as the cottage in front and could not be sold separately. It could be a
workspace for the resident of the larger home in front, a mother-in-law apartment, or a
separately rented living unit
Would there be any commercial or office uses in the development? No, only
residential uses would be allowed in the PUD. Home offices would be permitted, but
they are already allowed in most residential zone districts.
Would the zoning change for the property? Yes, the zoning would change from R-1-C
(single unit residential with small lot size) to Planned Unit Development (PUD).
How many lots are there currently? There are seven 25 foot lots with a total of 175
feet of frontage on Logan.
How much parking would be provided? There will be 2 spaces for each apartment
plus one guest space (9 total for the apartments). There will be 2 spaces for each new
cottage home (8 total for the cottages). Currently there are not separately designated
parking spaces for the flexible living spaces above the detached garages.
• There is concern that the project will make it so that people park in front of our
homes on the street? In addition to the 17 designated parking spaces that we will
provide, there is approximately 250 feet of street frontage along our property (Logan
and Floyd); this will fit approximately 11 additional vehicles along the street, although
we do not anticipate needing tha t.
• Will there be additional traffic in the unpaved alley? The traffic added to the alley
should be minimal with this residential use.
• Are the utilities adequate in the alley for the project? Our initial review does not
indicate any issues, but we will be looking into that to that further.
• Will the City make you pave the alley? Public Works and the Traffic Division will be
reviewing our plans once we make a formal application . In the past, other apartment
developments in the neighborhood were not required to pave the alley.
• We need the alley to be well lit for safety purposes. We will make a note of that
• We need the alley well lit, but not so there is lots of glare or light pollution. Noted,
we will use downcast cut-off lighting.
• What price will be the asking price for the cottage houses? We're not sure yet, but
it's likely they will be $400,000 or more.
• Will this PUD go to City Council? Yes, Brook Bell with the Community Development
Department will go over the City's process.
• There are lots of seniors in the neighborhood; there is a concern that their p roperty
taxes will go up. (neighbor 's answer) Perhaps, but that would be because their
property values went up which would more than offset an increase in property taxes.
2
• I th ink this project will really spruce up the area and bring in younger people that we
are lacking in this neighborhood.
• Given the size of the homes, what about the yard space for kids? We are still
working on the design and will make a note of that.
• How much space is between the houses? 7 0 feet
• Where do the stai rs come up to the flexibf e living space above the garage? They
come up from the back yard of the cottage; the stairs will be well lit.
• I would prefer single story garages without the flexible living space above. Noted.
• What is your timeline for construction? We think it could be 6 months to go through
the City process and then 6 months to construct the project Construction times during
the day are regulated by City codes.
• Will there be designated parking during construction? We haven't gotten that far yet;
perhaps we can make an agreement with the nearby church .
• There is concern that the alley off of Floyd is slippery in the winter. Noted.
• What is the setback from the north property line? 6 feet What will the grade be of
the northernmost cottage? It will be lower than the grade of the existing house to the
north.
• Is each cottage for one family? The cottages in front will be a single dwelling unit for
one household.
• I applaud your efforts on the Shriner building. I do have some concerns for density,
the alley, and parking. I recommend you do 3 cottages instead of 4. We will look
into that
•
•
•
•
3
• Have you thought about attaching the garages? Yes, but then the cottages would not
have viable back yards or rear patios .
• Do you think scrape offs are coming to this neighborhood? I'm not sure, but there
are a lot of good amenities nearby.
• I like your ideas; I think the project will be good for the neighborhood. Thank you.
• Are you confident you can rehabilitate the Shriner building for residential? From
what we have investigated so far, yes.
• Can we have another meeting? We are only required to do one neighborhood
meeting. There will be two more public hearings as part of the PUD process with the
City; you are welcome to provide input at those meetings.
• People are moving back to the City from the suburbs. This is a good project,
Englewood is a great city. Yes, we think so too.
• Have you found a cornerstone for the Shriner building? Not so far.
4. City staff outlined the PUD process and next steps. The PUD frequently asked questions
were provided.
5. Toby Terhune of Shadow Creek Homes made some closing remarks and the meeting
was adjourned .
Pre-Appblation Neighborhood Meeting • -November 7 , 2013
Subject: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Proposal for 3265-3299 South Logan Street
Name Address City Zip Code
~ 12,,,./4---I ·:s 3 <;".', 'f"Pet),11 I Ehc/,pvoe.,l I &c, I
l) ~h.S/e,'V2tJY\ 3J?/1 S, lJ~sL~~ ~ -/ I ~{,'")
-~ "3-:,-j?J A~ ~Ar I { -i,· 1~11~
;;;L.~ -:3>7C) jT_ ~)+-G _ &11~
l
J~Q/ Jo:JJ~ J). £-;i~ ';)~ I~ l~Ol)JJ
>i0;1/db~ ;22-;;)-J> ~ P~ S-t-,,._ "'-
_b/(fs. I ~11-=s
i ( ' 0 I,,(,... • • -.,./ I JJ.71 S Cfrtt-J.. I Vfv'C? r. I s-011-t
Please print clearly -Thank You!
Pre-Application Neighborhood Meeting November 7, 2013
Subject: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Proposal for 3265-3299 South Logan Street
Name Address City Zip Code
A-n Y\ Gi ues5f-o,J
,~~
C a +6 Lv,.·:c.,2... VI 4--i-o N f>L11c ~ I T)e,~ ven ~ a ~2-3
, ocJ ,r.3 '.7 ~ ,.{
?,~( s (__°Su V\ ~ bvw;J <?61 I
3 3 30__ ~D..c+ \._c,C;ta_V\ St ~Ol~-QU.:>CC mu
• Please print cleJI.ly-Thank You! -
Pre-Appm:ation Neighborhood Meeting • -November 7, 2013
·.
Subject: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Proposal for 3265-3299 South Logan Street
Name Address City Zip Code
Ra...\T\.l-1' &'-'., '-~. i
-#=: 2CJ'-f
t:~L= I \ ,..,,1/ g"O-I ( 2:, 31-7b t, r--~.c...-t" ~--r
I
,¥ /;c # 4'/"'.;:? ~,.--~c:s 7 Z"?o/ ~ ~6#4/ )r
~ -
b~~ ,Ft:P//5 ?P3!.-?f'5'. :?/5"""~
·-~-
-__ ._.?
Please print clearly -Thank You!
Pre-Application Neighborhood Meeting November 7, 2013
Subject: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Proposal for 3265-3299 South Logan Street
Name Address City Zip Code
R~lJ r/\~ 3~b3 5, ~ ~IJJ ~//.)
'
• Please print clearly -Thank You ! --
Brook Bell
ubject: FW: pud
From: Debbie Tapia
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 9:18 PM
To: Brook Bell
Subject: FW: pud
Hi Brook,
I just wanted to forward you this email Toby received.
> From: tobyt@shadowcreekhomes.net
> Subject: RE: pud
> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21 :11 :08 -0700
>
> Thanks Lila, we appreciate your support. Look forward to meeting you at
> some point in the future. Have a great day.
>
>
> Toby Terhune
> President
hadow Creek Homes LLC
535 W. 115th Drive
> Westminster, CO 80234
> (p) 303.635.0830 (f) 303.635.0968
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lila
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 8:07 AM
> To: tobvt<@.shadowcreekhomes.net
> Subject: pud
>
> Nov 14-2013
> Toby Terhune, We were unable to attend the November 7th meeting.However you
> need to know we are very in favor of the 3200 So Logan St project.
> Sincerely Lila & Leonard Albertson
>
l
EXHIBIT C
L,.O l #f ·vv I
fl!
I.
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
City Council Chambers -Englewood Civic Center
April 22, 2014
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at
7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Englewood Civic Center, Chair Fish
presiding.
Present: Bleile, Brick, Fish, Freemire, King, Kinton (arrived 7:05), Knoth, Roth,
Townley, Madrid (alternate)
Absent:
Staff:
None
Alan White, Director, Community Development
Chris Neubecker, Senior Planner
Brook Bell, Planner II
Nancy Reid, Assistant City Attorney
Also Present: Toby Terhune, Shadow Creek Homes
8
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
April 8, 2014
King moved;
Knoth seconded: TO APPROVE THE APRIL 8, 2014 MINUTES
Chair Fish asked if there were any modifications or corrections. There were none
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Bleile, Brick, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth, Townley, Chair Fish
None
Freemire
Kinton (arrived 7:05)
Motion carried.
~
Ill. PUBLIC HEARING CASE #ZON2014-001 3299 SOUTH LOGAN STREET
RESIDENCES PUD
Brick moved;
Page 1 of 9
Knoth seconded: TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING FOR CASE #ZON2014-001 3299 SOUTH
LOGAN STREET RESIDENCES PUD
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
fl
Bleile, Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth, Townley, Chair Fish
None
None
None
Staff Presentation
Brook Bell, Planner II, was sworn in. Mr. Bell reviewed the project as proposed to allow a
maximum of three one unit dwellings, one two unit dwelling and three detached
accessory structures above garages that may be used as dwelling units.
The applicant is requesting to rezone the property from R-1-C to the "3299 South Logan
Street Residences PUD". The PUD would encompass the property at 3265 and 3299
South Logan Street. A variance was granted in 1967 to allow the Shrine club use with
conditions that narrowly defined the proposed use. With the narrowly defined variance,
and the lack of enough land area to allow other permitted uses, the marketability of the
property was limited. In order to meet the minimum size requirement of ½ acre for a
PUD, the applicant purchased the property to the north at 3265 South Logan Street.
Three of the garages are proposed with detached accessory structures above them (400
square feet maximum). The property owner has the option to use the accessory structure A
as they see fit but must occupy either the principal structure or the accessory structure if W
the accessory structure contains a secondary suite (dwelling unit).
The proposed design includes the defined architectural requirements. The plans provided
to the Commission are conceptual and subject to minor changes, however any changes
will need to meet the design standards, guidelines and setbacks of the PUD.
~
The density of the proposed PUD is lower than some of the properties to the west and
southwest of subject property (across the alley) that contains multi-unit apartment
buildings. The proposal includes two garage parking spaces for each principal unit and
either one garage or surface parking space for the accessory units. Because the property is
located on a corner, 240 linear feet of on street parking is available, the equivalent of 10
parking spaces. e
The Public Works department reviewed the plan and concluded that a traffic impact study
is not required due to the minor increase in traffic over the existing volume. The Logan
Street and Floyd Avenue intersection is signalized and controls the traffic near the site. e
The UDC requires that 40% of the property is landscaped and the PUD matches that
requirement as well as meeting the landscaping requirements for R-1-C zone district.
Page 2 of 9
•
Drainage plans have been approved by the Public Works Department. The dedication of
park land requirement will be satisfied by a fee in lieu payment amount between $1,600
and $3,000.
fl)
The Commission may consider the findings included in the Staff Report when reviewing
the proposed PUD.
Staff has reviewed the PUD application and found that it is in conformance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
The Department of Community Development recommends that the Planning and Zoning
Commission review the 3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD request and forward a
favorable recommendation for approval to City Council.
fJl
Comments from the Commissioners:
King -What is the proposed height of garage? The maximum height of the detached
accessory structure is 32'; if it does not have the accessory unit above the garage, the
maximum height is 16'.
Kinton -How long has the property been on the market? (Mr. Bell: About 2 years, during
which time the City received inquiries about the property. The zoning would not allow
uses other than residential and those permitted by the variance. Without a change in
zoning, the opportunities were limited as far as how the property could be used.)
0
Bleile -What is the minimum lot width in R-1-C? (Mr. Bell: There are two lot widths in R-
1-C: a standard lot is SO', the minimum lot width for an existing small lot is 37'. The lot
widths can vary in a PUD. The two new lots are 37 ½ wide which meets small lot
standards. There are some existing lots in R-1-C that are only 25' wide.)
JJ
Bleile -What is the intent of including the detached accessory unit? (Mr. Bell: The PUD
provides 3 possible uses 1) home occupation, 2) secondary suite (living unit), and 3)
flexible living space. e
The UDC does not currently address new detached accessory units. Many communities
locally and nationally are adopting provisions into their code to allow them.)
~
Bleile -What is the minimum square footage for a single family residence in R-1-C? (Mr.
Bell: There is no minimum square footage requirement. These detached accessory units
would be limited to a maximum of 400 square feet.)
~
Roth -Most of the parking is provided in the garage spaces. There is enough space to
make the garages larger or add surface parking area. For lots 1,4,5 which do not have
detached accessory structures, there is minimum of two garage spaces for each dwelling
unit.
~
Page 3 of 9
Roth -Is the rear setback of 6 feet enough for the garages? (Mr. Bell: The traffic
department commented that garages setback5 from the alley more than 6 feet can become
Qroblem with the rear end of cars extending into the alleys.)
Bleile -Will parking be available on Floyd? (Mr. Bell: Yes, on street parking will be
available on Floyd Avenue.)
~
Applicant Presentation
Toby Terhune, Shadow Creek Homes, 2535 West 115th Drive, Westminster, Colorado,
was sworn in. Mr. Terhune presented a slide show with images of the proposed
development. Mr. Terhune introduced the members of his team who were present at the
meeting.
Q
The neighborhood meeting held last November influenced decisions about the design and
density of the project. The home at 3265 South Logan will be remodeled and updated,
two new homes will be added and the Shriner building will be divided into two units.
Four new garages will be added. The accessory dwelling units above three of the garages
will be added as an option for their customers.
~
Bleile -What is the timing of construction? (Mr. Terhune: As soon as possible.)
~
King -Why limit the ground floor of the garage to 400 square feet? (Mr. Terhune: This
can be changed based on buyer preference.) e
Townley -Is there any discussion about paving the alley? (Mr. Terhune: No.) Who is
responsible for the maintenance of the landscaping? (Mr. Terhune: The property owners.)
Freemire -The existing grade rises 4 feet higher than the level on Floyd, how will that be
addressed? (Mr. Terhune: The bottom floor of the building is below grade, the lot will be
leveled where it has been built up. The garages will be at the alley level.)
G
Public Testimony
John Taylor, 3261 S. Logan Street, was sworn in . He feels that the development will
create traffic problems. He cited Cherry Creek North parking issues. e
Conclusion from Staff
The site has very few allowed uses as it is currently zoned. The proposal is for a very
good project that will be beneficial to the community. e
Bleile -How is the requirement enforced that the owner resides on the property? (Mr.
Bell : The PUD sets the regulation; Community Development does not seek out properties
for compliance. The requirement that the owners live in either the main or the accessory
Page 4 of 9
unit provides some assurance that the property will be well maintained with the owner
present on the property.:)
E)
Roth moved;
Freemire seconded: TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CASE #ZON2014-001 3299
SOUTH LOGAN STREET RESIDENCES PUD
AYES: Bleile, Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth, Townley, Chair Fish
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Motion passes.
King moved;
Freemire seconded: TO APPROVE CASE #ZON2014-001 3299 SOUTH LOGAN STREET
RESIDENCES PUD APPLICATION AS WRITTEN AND FORWARD
TO ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION.
Brick -A substantial amount of landscaping is included in the plan and the parking is
adequate for the development. The inclusion of the requirement that the owners live on
the property is a positive. e
King -Should the building revert to its original use as a club, parking would be more of an
issue. The requirement of the owner to live on the property would be addressed during
title commitment in the purchase process. g
Chair Fish -This is a good use for the building.
~
King -The bulk plane as it exists in the UDC is too restrictive and this development would
set a new standard for the City.
~
Roth -Accessory units already exist in Englewood; it appears that this will be a trend in
the future.
Vote:
~
Bleile -Yes, despite his resistance to change, it is a necessary change to encourage
development and reuse of existing buildings that could otherwise potentially fall into
decay. The transition from the new buildings to the older homes on the street is good.
fl
Brick -Yes, the project meets the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan with a
balanced use of housing. The quality of the materials and type of work will exceed the
Page 5 of 9
standards that exist currently. The density does not significantly impact the surrounding
neighborhood. • e
Freemire -Yes, commended the developer for listening to the neighborhood and adapting
the plan. It is appropriate and meets the goals of the City.
FA
King -Yes, it is a difficult site to develop and the developer has done a good job with the
design. The owner is sensitive to the needs of the neighborhood.
fl
Knoth -Yes e
Roth -Yes, the project meets a number of elements of the Comprehensive Plan. The
owner occupancy requirement is a positive. The development is different but fits the
neighborhood. e
Townley -Yes, the development is unique, it has appropriate scale, adequate parking and
the proposed development fits the Comprehensive Plan and complements the
neighborhood.
~
Fish -Yes, he agrees with the Commissioners. Englewood's housing stock is maturing and
as is an issue that the City faces going forward, this will enhance the variety of housing
available.
~
Kinton -Yes, the project makes good use of the existing structure and brings a needed
diversity of housing. The project meets the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
El
Motion passes to approve case #2014-001 3299 South Logan Street PUD with a favorable
recommendation to City Council.
~
Bleile moved;
Knoth seconded: TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING FOR CASE #2013-07 AMENDMENTS TO
PUD PROCESS
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Bleile, Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth, Townley, Chair Fish
None
None
None e
Chris Neubecker, Senior Planner, was sworn in. The history of the case was reviewed.
~
A two-step PUD process will enable developers to obtain entitlements to the property
prior to developing a detailed plan which would result in cost and time savings. The
amendments will clarify the current code and additionally provide increased detail
outlining the PUD process.
Commissioner Comment
Page 6 of 9
•
. .
e
Brick -What is the potential benefit to citizens? (Mr. Neubecker: The two step process
allows for additional opportunity for public comment. The advantages to the developer
would potentially increase development opportunity which would be beneficial to the
community.)
8
Roth -Noted typographical errors.
~
Public Comment
Lewis Fowler, 3700 South Cherokee Street, Englewood, was sworn in. Mr. Fowler spoke
in support of the amendments to the PUD process. He likes the fact that public has more
oflortunities to comment on applications.
Mr. Neubecker thanked the Commissioners for their cooperation and feedback during the
long process of amending the code on this issue.
fl
Bleile moved;
Knoth seconded: TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CASE #2013-07
AMENDMENTS TO PUD PROCESS
AYES:
NAYS:
Bleile, Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth, Townley, Chair Fish
None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Motion passes.
Bleile moved;
Knoth seconded:
Comments
~
TO APPROVE CASE #2012-07 AMENDMENTS TO THE PUD
PROCESS WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO CITY
COUNCIL.
Bleile thanked Staff for their work and believes that future applicants will see the benefit of
the improvements.
Fish -The time taken has resulted in a quality product, he thanked Staff.
King -A lot of time and input has been devoted to this topic and Staff did a great job.
~
Kinton -This is a significant improvement in the PUD process and hopes that it will
encourage more development.
Q
Page 7 of 9
Roth -Makes the process clearer and will eliminate the types of issues that arose in the
past.
Q
Townley-An efficient and streamlined process, likes the opportunity for more community
iG)ut.
AYES:
NAYS:
Bleile, Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth, Townley, Chair Fish
None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Motion passes.
IV. PUBLIC FORUM
No Public was present to address the commission. e
V. ATTORNEY'S CHOICE
Ms. Reid requested that the Commission adopt the Planning Commission Handbook.
Knoth moved;
Bleile seconded: "To Adopt a policy allowing Staff and the City Attorney to include
..
within any ordinance the necessary amendments to the Unified A
Development Code that are necessary to ensure that portions of the W
Englewood Municipal Code that refer to existing or amended code
language, or that is needed to reference the new language, shall be
included within said ordinance, and that such housekeeping and
editing issues shall not require further discussion or hearings by the
Planning and Zoning Commission".
Vote: All Commissioners voted in favor of the policy. Motion passes.
Brick -Believes that this policy change will be beneficial to the process of making
changes to the code. e
VI. STAFF'S CHOICE
Director White added that the adopted policy change will allow Staff to fix administrative
issues without having to take the issue to Public Hearing.
Mr. Neubecker stated that Part 3 of the TSA overlay district will be presented at the May 6
meeting. Other items that were included on the 2014 work priorities are bulk plane.
Director White suggested that discussion regarding Accessory Dwelling Units be delayed.
The Capital Project budget will be presented to the Commission.
VII. COMMISSIONER'S CHOICE
Page 8 of 9
•
E1
Mr. Madrid commented on PUD project and is looking forward to seeing the change, feels
that the inclusion of the Accessory Dwelling Unit allows for a more diverse population
and provides good options for residents.
~
Mr. Brick asked for an update on the Martin Plastics property; Director White stated that
he anticipated a request for a change to their plan.
0
M·r. Bleile asked about the Winslow property. There have been discussions about multi-
family development but with the current restrictions on the property there would be an
amendment to the PUD.
~
Ms. Townley asked if it would be beneficial to have a representative of Economic
Development attend the meeting regarding the TSA Overlay to provide input.
The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m .
.... ls ..... l ..... lu ..... l ___ ie __ B ___ a ___ i ..... le...,y ___ ~, Recording Secretary
Page 9 of 9
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF CASE #ZON2014-001, )
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS )
AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE )
REZONING OF 3265-3299 SOUTH LOGAN )
STREET FROM R-1-C (SINGLE UNIT )
RESIDENTIAL, SMALL LOT SIZE) TO THE )
3299 SOUTH LOGAN STREET RESIDENCES )
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT )
)
INITIATED BY; )
Toby Terhune )
Shadow Creek Homes, LLC )
Westminster, Colorado 80031 )
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF THE
CITY PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION
Commission Members Present: Bleile, Brick, Fish, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth,
Townley
Commission Members Absent: None
This matter was heard before the City Planning and Zoning Commission on April 22,
2014 in the City Council Chambers of the Englewood Civic Center.
Testimony was received from staff. The Commission received notice of Public Hearing,
Certification of Posting, the Staff Report, and a copy of the proposed 3299 South Logan
Street Residences Planned Unit Development which were incorporated into and made a
part of the record of the Public Hearing.
After considering the statements of the witness and reviewing the pertinent documents,
the members of the City Planning and Zoning Commission made the following Findings
and Conclusions.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THAT th e Shadow Creek Homes, LLC, has submitted an application to rezone the
properties from R-1-C Single Unit Residential District (Small Lot Size) to the 3299
South Logan Street Residences Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed PUD
would allow for a maximum of three (3) one-unit dwellings, one (1) two-unit dwelling,
and three (3) detached accessory structures above garages that may be used as
dwelling units.
Page I of 3
2. THAT notice of the Public Hearing was published in the Englewood Herald on April
4, 2014 and notice of the Public Hearing was on the City of Englewood website from
April 8, 2014 through April 22, 2014.
3. THAT the property was posted as required, said posting setting forth the date, time,
and place of the Public Hearing.
4. THAT pursuant to the Planned Unit Development procedure, the applicant conducted
a neighborhood meeting on November 7, 2013.
5. THAT notice of the neighborhood meeting was mailed to property owners and the
occupants of property within 1000 feet of the site.
6. THAT the final 3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD packet was submitted on
February 13 th , 2014.
7. THAT the applicant will provide 2 parking spaces for each dwelling unit and 1 parking
space for each detached accessory structure above the garage.
8. THAT the Public Works Department reviewed the proposed PUD for impacts and
concluded a traffic study was not required due to the slight increase in traffic.
9. THAT one member of the general public testified during the public hearing and A
expressed concern about traffic. •
10. THAT the rezoned property will not have a significant negative impact on those
properties surrounding the rezoned area and the general public health, safety and
welfare of the community are protected.
CONCLUSIONS
1. THAT the PUD application is in conformance with Roadmap Englewood: 2003
Comprehensive Plan.
2. THAT the application is consistent with adopted and generally accepted standards of
development in the City.
3. THAT The application is substantially consistent with the goals, objectives, design
guidelines, policies and any other ordinance, law, or requirement of the City.
4. THAT the proposed development will exceed the development quality standards,
levels of public amenities, or levels of design innovation otherwise applicable under
this Title, and would not be possible or practicable under a standard zone district with
conditional uses or with a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative
Adjustments. •
Page 2 of3
5. THAT the property cannot be developed, or that no reasonable economic use of the
property can be achieved under the existing zoning, even through the use of
conditional uses or a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative
Adjustments.
6. THAT The rezoned property will not have a significant negative impact on those
properties surrounding the rezoned area and the general public health, safety and
welfare of the community are protected.
7. THAT the PUD supports the Roadmap Englewood: 2003 Englewood Comprehensive
Plan.
DECISION
THEREFORE, it is the decision of the City Planning and Zoning Commission that Case
#ZON2014-001 3299 South Logan Street Residences PUD application should be referred
to the City Council with a favorable recommendation.
The decision was reached upon a vote on a motion made at the meeting of the City
Planning and Zoning Commission on April 22, 2014, by King, seconded by Freemire,
which motion states:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
CASE #2074-007 3299 SOUTH LOGAN STREET RESIDENCES PUD
BE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A
FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION.
Bleile, Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth, Townley, Fish
None
None
None
Motion carried.
These Findings and Conclusions are effective as of the meeting on April 22, 2014 .
BY ORDER OF THE CITY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Page 3 of3