The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2013 Ordinance No. 004• • • BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. L SERIES OF 2012/2013 COUNCIL BILL NO . 68 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER WOODWARD AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THEW H PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) LOCATED AT 3001 SOUTH GALAP AGO STREET IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO. WHEREAS, this property is a 6.12 acre site occupied by Winslow Construction Company since 1954, and has been zoned I-1 and R-2-B; and WHEREAS, W H Investments submitted an application for the proposed Planned Unit Development to establish specific zoning and site planning criteria for development for a Planned Unit Development (PUD); and WHEREAS, W H PUD would allow single family residential and attached town homes on this site as well as continuing industrial uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a Public Hearing on November 20, 2012;and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended a denial of the application to rezone the property known as 3001 South Galapago Street et al. from I-1 and R-2-B to a Planned Unit Development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The W H Planned Unit Development (PUD) located at 3001 South Galapago Street et al. in the City of Englewood, Colorado, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby approved. Section 2 . The applicant, W H Planned Unit Development (PUD) wishes to amend its application to limit the uses allowed in this PUD to the following: Uses Allowed by the PUD District Plan Residential Uses Group living facility, large/special Group living facility, small One and Multi-Unit Dwellings allowed in the R-2 -B Zone District Live/work dwelling Low, Medium and High Density Multi-unit dwellings Multi-Family Related Ancillary Uses such as Leasing Office, Private Recreation Facilities, etc. 1 11 bi Puhli c/lnstitutional Uses Athletic field Community garden Library Museum P ark and Open Space Religious institutions and associated accesso ry uses Schools '\ Telecommunication Facility (See Chap ter 16-7, "Te leco mmunications , "for appli cab le us e-relat ed guidelines and standards), to include alternative tower structure, Antenna (mjcrowave antenna, sectorize d panel antenna, whip antenna) and Tower structure Transit Center Co mmercial Uses Greenhouse/nursery, raising of plants, flowers , or nursery stock Assembly hall or auditorium, hall rental for meetings or social occasions Membership orga ni za ti on Indoor Entertainment/ Amusement Amusement establishment as a Conditional Use Physica l fitness center/spa Theater and perfonnance/co ncert venue, not including adult entertainment General outdoor recrea tion, as a Conditional Use Check cashing facility Financial institution, with drive-through service Financial institution, without drive-through serv ice Food and Beverage Service, Including: Brewpub Caterer Microbrewery Restaurant, bar, tavern with or without outdoor operations Restaurant, with drive-through service Take out and delivery only Medical and Scientific: Clime Hospital Laboratory (dental, medical or optical) O ffice, type 1 (general) Office, type 2 (lirnited) Dry cleaner, drop-off site only Instructional service Personal Care Service, Including photography studio and photo lab, upholstery, printer, locksmith, tailor Repair shop (not including auto) Retail Sales and Service (Sales), Including: Antique store Art gallery 2 • • • • • • Buy-back, second-hand, thrift, consignment stores, Large Buy-back, second-hand, thrift, consignment stores, Small Convenience store Grocery/specialty food store Internet sales location Liquor store Retail sales, general merchandise Trade or business school Radio/television broadcasting studio, recording/film studio Automotive service station (gasoline facility) Car wash, auto detailing Parking facility, structure (operable vehicles), principal use Parking area, surface (operable vehicles), principal use Hotel Hotel, Extended Stay Industrial Uses Wholesale Sales and distribution Industrial Service, light Manufacturing (Including processing, fabrication or assembly), light Manufacturing (Including processing, fabrication or assembly), heavy Moving and storage Outdoor storage Storage yard for vehicles, equipment, material, and/or supplies, including Contractor office and yard Warehousing and/or storage, including mini-storage Commercial storage, sales and repair of operable vehicles and equipment All Commercial and Industrial Uses shall have a maximum height of one-hundred feet (100') And the City and Council hereby accepts this amendment to the PUD District Plan. The allowed uses are hereby included on the PUD District Plan. Section 3. The applicant, W H Planned Unit Development (PUD) wishes to amend its application to provide that all allowed industrial uses (and not public/institutional and commercial uses) shall cease and shall not be grandfathered nor considered legal, non-conf orrning uses upon the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any residential or commercial use within the PUD, whether or not the property contained within the PUD boundaries has been platted. And the City Council hereby accepts this amendment to the PUD District Plan. This restriction is hereby included on the PUD District Plan. Section 4. Development on any portion of the PUD for any residential use (and not public/institutional, commercial, or industrial uses) shall be subject to site plan review by the Planning and Zoning Commission and review and approval by City Council. If any site plan is submitted for public/institutional, commercial or industrial uses, it will be processed administratively as allowed by the Unified Development Code. This requirement is hereby included in the PUD District Plan . 3 Introduced and considered on the 17°' day of December, 2012 and continued until the 22 nd day of Janu a ry, 2013. • Reintroduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 22nd day of January, 2013. Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City's official newspaper on the 25 11 ' clay of January, 2013. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City's official website beginning on the 23n 1 clay of J a nuary , 2013 for thirty (30) days. A Public Hearing was h e ld on the 4th clay of February, 2013. Read on seco nd readin g and amended on February 19°', 2013 Published as amended by title in the City's official newspaper on the 22nd day of February, 2013. Publi shed as amended on second readin g by title on the C ity 's official website beginning on the 20th day of February, 2013 for thirty (30) days. Read by title and passed as amended on final reading on the 4°' day of March, 2013. Published by title as amended in the City's official newspaper as Ordinance No . j, Series of 2013, on the 8th day of March, 2013. Published by title as amended on the City's official website begi1ming on the 6th day of March, 2013 for thirty (30) days. I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true copy 05Je amended Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. T' Series of 2013 . ' ·!/& 4 • • • • • PUD LEGAL DESC RIPTION A PARCEL Of LAND SII\JA1ED IN THE NOR !H WEST OUAR1ER OF SECTION THI RIY-fOUR (J4) AN D NORTHEAST OOAR1ER OF SECTION THIRTY-THREE (JJ), TOv.NSHIP FOOR SOOTH (f .4S.). RANGE SI XTY -EI GHT 'llr[Sl (R.68W.}, SIXTH PRIN CIPAL tJ[RIDI AN (6TH P.M.), CIT Y Of ENCi.£~. COJNTY CF ARAPAHO£, STAT£ Of CCl.ffiADO, Mm£ PARTta.JLARLY 0£SCRIBEO AS FOi.LOWS: LOTS 1-24 AND 42-49 INQUSNE, ALONG .,TH THE RESER>l:O STRP or LANO LATING SOU TH Of LOI 19 Of THE TA YL OR'S ADDIT ION AS RECORDED IN BK. 2 AT PG. 13; TOCElHER Yl1 TH ALL Cf VACA TID HURON STR£ET L YlNG NOfHH OF TH£ NORTH LI NE Cf DARTMOOTH A VENUE AHIJ SOOTH OF TH E N<JlTH UN[ AND NOR TH LINE EX1EN DED OF CORNELL STREE T, AND ,u OF THA T PART OF VACATED OORNELL STREET LTING WE ST OF THE WE ST LfiE or THE AU[Y IN SAil BLOC!< 1, AS RECffi0£0 IN BK. 1928 AT PAC£ 395; TOC£THER .,Tl< A PARCEL Of LANO LOCATED IN THE Sf 1/4 OF HE T/4 OF SECTION 33, 11lWNSltP 4 SOU TH , RANCf 68 WEST OF TH E 611< P,M ., BONG M<J1E PARTI CULARLY ocscm sm AS rouows, COIIIIENONG Al THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF SA/0 SE 1/4 OF NE 1/+, TH(NC[ ~Tl1 ALONG 1tt[ [AST Lll<tE CT SAID SE 1/4 Of NE 1/4, A DISTANCE fK 540.0 FEt T, MORE ~ LESS, TO A PONT 50.0 FEET SOJTH(ASTERlY, AT RIGHJ ANQ.ES FROW TH( CENJ[R LJ NE OF THE !J AIN TRAO< OF THE ATCHIS(Jil, TOPEKA ANO SANTA FE RAI.WA Y COMPANY: TH ENO: SOU ll<ll[STERLY PARALLEL 'MTH ANO 50.0 f[[T SOUIHEAST£RLY AT RI GHT ANQ£S FROM TH E CfNTER LIi£ OF THE ~AIN TRACI< OF THE ATCH ISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA f[ RAILWAY COMPAN Y, A DISIAN<:i or 57J.O fIET, MORE OR LESS TO A PCllll ON TH E SOUTH LINE OF SAIO SE 1/4 CF NE 1/4: lliENCE EAS T ALONG THE SOUTH LINE Of SAID S( 1/-4 Of NE. 1/4, A DISTANCE Of 180.0 f[(T, MORE OR LESS. TO THE PON T Of BEGI NNIN G, ALL BONG St!B..£CT TO RIGHTS-Of" -W AY FOR EXISTING OA RTMOU TH AVENUE AND RIGHTS-Of-WAY AS R£S£R\£0 IN VACATED STRITTS, AS RfOORDED IN BK . J588 Al PAC£ 358: TCXUHER YITH A PARCll OF LANO LOCATED N llfE. NW 1/4 ~ SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 Of SECTION 34, TOViN SHIP 4 SOUTH. RANCE 68 WES T 'Y" THE SIX lli PRINCPAL MERI OtAN, ARAPAHOC COJNTY. CCl.ORADO, BEING MCH: PAR TICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENONG AT A POINT ON Tl£ SOUTll UN[ OF SAil NW 1/4 Of SW 1/4 Of NW 1/4 ll'rll()l IS 200.0 FEET EAST Of 11lE SOUTH\IJEST OORNER Of SAJO NW 1/4 or SW T/4 OF NW 1/4: THENCE NOOTH PARALLEL IIO TH THE 'McST LI NE OF SAID NW 1/4 Of SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4, A DI STANCE OF 540.0 FEET, MORE OR USS. TO A POINT 50.0 FEET SOJTHEASIERLY, AT RIQ-H ANGLES FR c»,!, THE C£NTER LH Of ll£ MAI N TRACK OF TH E AIOilSON, TCffKA ANO SANTA fE RAILWAY COMPAN Y; !HENCE SOO IH\\£S 1ERLY ON A CURv( 10 THE RIGH I, PARALLEL WI TH AND 50.0 FEEf SOOJH(ASTm..Y, Al RIGHT ANGLES FROM. THE U:NIER LIi£ or rH E MA!N ffiACK (l" lHE ATOUSOO, IOPO<A AND SAN TA re RAl\41A Y COIPANY, A IJISTANCE OF 563.0 fEET, MOU: OR u:ss. 10 A PONT ON rH[ SOUTH LINE or SAI D NW 1/4 (J" SW 1/4 (J" NW 1/4; THENCE [AS!, ALONG TH[ SOOTH LINE Of SAID NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 ff NW 1/4. A CN STANCE OF 16 2.0 F£ET. M<m OR LE SS. TO Tl-£ POINT Of" BEGINNING. AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM TH[ SOOTH 30.0 FEET FOO tHGI-IWA'Y PURPOS[S, AS RECORDED IN BK. 3588 AT PAGE l58; TOGElHER Willi A PARCO.. OF LANO IN lHE W ½ Of THE NW 1/4 OF f'HE SW 1/4, <::E THE NW 1/4 CE SECTION 34, TO'IW-ISI-IP 4 SOU TH, RANG£ 68 '-lll{ST (1-"" TI-fE 6TH P.M., B£1NG MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLL OWS: COHSIOERWG TH E NORTH u-l E Cf" TH£ NW 1/4 OF" SAID SECTION J4 J.S BEAR ING S a9•48'51· W ANO WITH All BEARINGS CON TAlNEO HEREIN R£LAT1 '-I( THERETO; B[GrNNIN{; AT TH [ NOOTll,CSI COONER OF SAIC SEC TION J◄: THCNCE ALONG TllE 111:S T LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF S.'JD SECTION J4, S 00'02'12" W, 1318.86 fIET TO TH E NOR TH \\£S T CORNER OF THE SW 1/4 Of THE NW 1/4 OF SAID SECTION J4: TH ENCE ALONG THE NOOTH lM OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF ~0 S£CTION J-4, N 89"4 2'38• E. 226 .46 f[El TO TliE TRUE PONT OF BE~N!NC, SA!□ TRUE POIN T OF BEGINNIN G BEING A PCXN T ON TH[ E>.ST[Rl. Y R!Q-IT-Of-WAY LINE OF THE ATCH ISON, T<PEKA ANO SANTA FE RAILROAD. SAID POINT Ai.SO BEtiG A PONT ON A CUR\£ CONC>.VE TO THE NOOTHW£ST HAVING A PARTIAL CENTRAL ANCI...E ~ 011l1'47" AN O A RADIUS ff 5779.65 fITT. IT IS 9.JBTENOEO BY A OIORO TH AT BEARS S 14"47'.J6• W, 103.87 FEET; THENCE: SOJTHERLY Al.ONG lliE ARC OF SAD CUR\/E 103.87 FEET TO THE ENO Of SAID ~VE. SAO EN O Of a..RVE ALSO BE!NG A POINT ON TH E EAS T{R LY LINE OF lHA T CERTAIN TRAC T OF LANO Cl:SCRIBED IN DEED RECOOOEO IN BOO< A33 AT PAGE lJ, RECORDS 1:1' THE COUNTY OF ARAPAHO£; THENCE Al~G SAID EAST£RLY UN[ S 00'02'13. W, 558.96 m, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF 1l<E W ½ OF lllE NW % OF TH E SW 1/4 Of THE NW 1/< or SAIO SEC TI ON 3◄: THENCE AlOOG SAIO SOUI H UNE N 59·39'JZ-E, 100.98 HE l 10 A POIN l ON IHE YC SI LINE OF THAl CE:RIAIN PARCEL Of LANO DESCR!B EO IN DE ED RECOOOED IN BOC>< 2221 AT PAG( 485; THEN CE DE PARTING SAID SOU TH LINE ANO ALONG SAO ll{SI LIN E N 00'02'12" E, 659 .1 6 r m TO THE NO~TH UNE Of" TH£ SW 1/4 Of TH[ NW 1/4 OF SAI D S(CTION J-4; TH£N CE At ONG SA ID NORTH UN[ S 89'4 2'38" W, 7-4 .65 ff[T TO TH E TRUE POINT OF 8EG1NNING, AS RECOOOEO IN BK. 5712 AT PG. 491; TOG[lHER 'MTH THOSE CER TAIN PARCE LS ·Of LANO CONVEYE D TO W.H. INVES TMEN TS INC ., A COLORADO COR PORATION, BY ST ATE DEPARTMENT Of Hl~WAYS, DIVISI ON CJ" HIGHWAYS, , MORE PARTICULARlY O[SCR18ED AS f"OI..LOWS: A REMAIN DER PARCEL Of LAND NO. 23R Of THE STATE DEPARMNT OF HIGiWAYS, 01\IISION Of HIGHWAYS, STATE Of" COLORAOO, PRQ.£CT NO. fQJ 085-2(51), IN LOTS 25 AN O 26, BLOC!< 1, TA'Y1..0RS ADD ITION. A SUBOMSION IN THE SW 1/4 Of THE NW 1/4 Of SECTION 34, TO\ffiSHIP <t SOO TH, RA.Na. 68 \'£ST Of TH E SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN AR APA HO[ COO NTY, CO..ffiAOO, SAI D REMAINDER PARCEL BE ING MORE PARTICULARt Y O[SCRIBEO AS FCUOYl'S: BWN .. NG Al A POINT ON TH E [AST UN[ or LOT 26, BLOCK 1, TAYLORS AD DITIO N, FOR WHICH TH[ WES T 1/< CORN ER OF SEC TION J4 BEARS S 64"47'19" W, 228.97 FUT; THEN CE N 01)2'12 " E Al.ONG SAID EAST LOT LI NE A DISTANCE ~ 46 .2 1 FEET; THENCE N 89"23'16" W A OISTAN<l: OF 50.00 FHT TO TH[ WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 25 Of" SAID BLOC K; THEN CE S 0'02'12" W, ALONG SAI D 'M:ST LOT LINE, A OISlA.HCl OF 45.20 FE.ET; THEN CE S 88 1.J'Jl" EA DISTANCE. Of 50.02 FEE T. f.lORE OR U:SS, 10 lHE POINI Cf" &GINNING. AS R(COROE.0 IN BK . 615J AT PG . 570; TOGETHER WITH A REMAINDER PARCEL OF LAND NO. 24R Cf" TH[ STATE DEPARTMENT or HIGHWAYS, DIVISION OF HIG-IWA Y'S, STATE OF COLORAOO, PROJ.:Cl NO. rcu 08~-2(51). IN LOTS 27, 28, 29, ANO JO, BLOCK 1, l AYI..ORS ADDITION, A SUB DIVIS!O'I IN TH[ SW 1/4 Of TH E N'W 1/-t, S£CTION 34, TOYINSH IP 4 SOO TH, RANG£ 68 WEST or THE SIX TH PRINCIPAL M[RIOIAN, IN ARAPAHOE COUN TY, CCX.ORADO, SAID REMAINOER PARCE L B □N G MOR[ PA RTIOJLARLY D£SCRIBEO AS FCUOWS: BEGINNING AT A PO INT ON THE WEST LIN E OF LOT 27. BLOO< 1, TA'Yt.(f(S AOOlTION , FROM YrHIC H Tl-IE YiEST 1/-4 CORN [R or SECTION 34 BEARS S 64'47'19• w, A OISTANC[ Of 22B.97 f[fl; THENC[ N 0-02'12" E, ALONG SAID WES T LOT UN[. A [)STANCE or 46.21 rEET: THENCE S 89'2 3'26. E A DISTANCE or 48.29 FEET: TH£NC[ ALONG TH [ ARC or A CURV E TO Tl-IE RlQ--IT HAVING A RADIUS OF 39.50 FE ET, A DISTANC[ OF 62 .05 FEET {THE OIORD OF THIS ARC B[ARS S 44"2 .3'26" E A DIST ANCE OF 55.86 FEET): Tll[N(I S O'J6 'J4" WA IJISTANCE or 8.49 rm: THENCE N 881J'31• WA DISTANCE OF 87.35 f[[T, MORE CR LESS, TO THE PONT CF BEGINNING. AS RECOROEO IN BK. 6153 AT PG. 570; (XU:PT ANY POR TION c,-fH[ ABOV't -O(SCR IB[O S L'llNG YIITHIN lH( BOUNDARIES or I H[ "8AI[S STR(ET JRtAN Gl[ PARCEL" CQNV[Y[O ro REGIONAL TRANSPOR TATI ON DISTRICT BY CHO R[COOOCO Jm.JARY 26 , 2004, AT R[C£PTION NO. 840162 16, 'M-I IQ-1 BATtS STR[[T TRIANGL( PARCEL IS OE srnlBED AS FOLLOWS: A PARCEL Of LAND LYING IN TH E SOJ TH WE ST OOARfER Of THE NORTHY1£ST QUARTER OF SECTJ ON 34, TQ'MiSHIP 4 SOOTH, RANCE 68 Ylf:ST OF TH( 6TH PRINOP.'J. MERIDIAN, ARAPAHC( C()JNT'Y, COLORADO, BEING MOR[ PAR TICULA RLY 0£SCRl8£0 AS f OLLOWS: COMMENON G AT THE NORTHWE ST ~N[R or SA ID SOUTH \'1£ST QUARTE R Of TH[ NORTHYl[ST QUARTER OF S[CTION 3-4 (3 )i. ALUMINUM CAP IN RANG( BOX MARKED PLSl7666-1995): 'M--l(NC[ THE SOU TH W'ES T CORN(R CJ" SAID SOOTHYltST OOARTER Of SECTIOO J4 (J ~-ALUMINUM CAP IN RAN<I. eox MARKED PLS 17666-1995) et:ARS S 0076'2 ◄-E A DISTANCE ~ 1J l 9.09 F[E T (BASlS OF BEARING -AS5'J MEO ); THENCE N 8973'46" E ALON G THE NOR THERLY LINE Of S~D SOUTHll[ST QUAR1ER OF THE NORTHY,£S T OUAR1ER or SECTIOO 34 A OISTANC[ OF 199.97 FEET TO AN ANG.£ POINT ON THE EA.STI RLY LINE OF A. PJ.RC(L OF LAN D RECORDED AT RECE:P TION NO A7038167 IN THE ARAP#iOE COUN TY CLERK ANO RECORDER'S CH IC[, BEING TliE POINT OF 8£CIN NINC; THENCE CONTINUIN G N 89"23'46 " ( NON-TANGENT 'M TH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CURVE , Ai..OOG SAID NMTHE RL Y LIN E A DISTANCE Cl' 26.2 1 FE[T TO TH E [AST[RLY LIH[ OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE ALONG SAID 8.JRUNCTON NffiTHERN RAILROA D RIGIT Of WAY BEING ON THE ARC Of A CURI/[ TO THE RIGH T , HAVING A CCNTRAL ANGLE or 1-00'37", A RADIUS Of 5779.65 FfE f , A Q-1000 B[AmNG CF S 107'44-" A OISTANCt. or 10 1.91 FUT. ANO AN ARC DI STANa: C1" 101.91 f"([T; TH [NC( N 00'16'26" W ALONG TH( EJ.ST[RlY LINE Of" SAJO PAR <l:L Of" LAND OESCR1 8EO IN REa:P TKJ< NUMBER A70l8 167, BEING NON-TA NGt:NT -,Tll THE LAST DESCRISEO CUR>I:, A 01 STANC( OF 98 .33 FEE T TO TH( POINT or 8EQNNING; AND EXCEPT AMY POOTION OF TH E A00\/1'-0ESCRIBEO PARCEL 2, PARcn 3, PARC£! 4 AND PAR CE L S L\1NG IIOTl<lN TH[ BOONDAR{S or Tl£ "CORNELL STREET TRIANGLE PARCEL" CON'v!:Y[O TO REQONAl TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT BY DEED R[COROEO JAMJARY 26, 2004, Al RECEPTlON NO. B-'0 16217, 'M-IICH CORNELL STRf:El ffl!AHGU PA~CTL IS OE.SCRIBED "5 FOlLOWS: A. PARCEL ~ LANO L'llNC IN TH( SOO TH\1£ST OUARTrR OF TH( NORTH'KST QUARTER OF SECTION J4 , TO'MolSHIP 4 SOUTH, RAN Gf 68 \\£S T Of Tl-I[ 6TH PRINCIPAL MER1 D!AN , ARAPAHO£ COUNTY, CCA.OOADO, BONG MOR[ PARTICULARLY DE SCRISE D AS r01.LOWSc W.,MENCING AT ll<E NOO THl\!'.ST COONER OF' SAID SOUTH,CST OOARTER OF lH[ NOOTH\11:SI OUARTER Of SECTION 34 (3 %" ALU MI NUM CAP IN RANGE BOX MARl<EO PLS 17666-1995); \\tlENCf THE SOIJ THll{SJ CORNE R OF SAID SOU TH\ll'SI OUART[R Of TH E HOOTHW£ST OUARTE R Of SECTION 34 (3 %" ALU MINUM CAP IN RANct BOX 1.tARK£0 PtS 17666-1995) B(ARS S 0016'24" E A OISTANC( Of" 1319 .09 f[[T (BASIS Of BEARINGS -ASSUMED): fll[NC[ S 0016 '2 4" E ALONG THE v.t:STE RL Y UN[ Of SAIO SOUTHWES T OUART[R Of THE NOR THWES T QUARTE R or S[C TICl-1 3-4 A OISTANa: or 659.54 f[[I 10 AN ANGlE POI Nl ON TH[ EASl[Rl Y UN[ Of A PARCEL Of LANO RECORD ED Al Rl CEPllON NUMBER A/0.l8 16 7 IN THE ARAPA HOE COUNTY QERk AND RECORDER 'S OFFICE, BEWG THE Pl)M l Of 8EG<NNING: TH ENCE N 8970'19" [ ALONG THE NOO THERLY LINE OF SAID P>.RC{L or LAND 0£Sffil8ED AT RECEPTION NO. A7038167 . ALSO BU NG THE NORTH[Rt Y LINE or THE SOU THWEST OOART[R or SAID SOOTHYiC ST QU AR TER OF TH[ Na;iTHYi£ST QUARTER OF SEC TI ON 34 A OtSTANCE Of" 21.49 f [ET TO TI-IE EAST£RL Y LINE Of THE BU RLINGTON NORTHERN RAI.ROAD Rl ~T OF WAY; THENCC ALONG SAID BURLINGTON N()l:THERN RAllRO AO RICI-I T or WAY S 18'04'5 3• W A DISTA NCE or 68.25 f[[l: !HENCE N 0016'2 ◄• W ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE Of SAI D PARCE L or LANO OESCRBEO IN REClPTION NUMBER A7 D38167, ALSO BEING THE Wf:ST£RL Y Llt<iE OF SA!O SOU!HWEST QUARTER Of THE NORTH\11£S1 QUART£R Of S£CTION 34 A OISTANCE Of 6.t.63 f"EfT 10 THf POINT CT BEGINNING . ANO EXCEPTING fROM PARCELS AN Y PORTION THEREOf OON'IEY[O TO THE OTY or ENGLEWOOD BY SPEaA L WARRAN TY DEED RE CORDED JUNE 19, 1989. AT RECEPTION NO . .3097368; ANO AN Y POR TI ON THEREOF CONVEYED TO STATE DEPARTM[N l or HIGHWAYS, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, STATE Of" CQOOAOO, BY SPEOAL WARRANTY DEED R£CCRDEO MAY 10, 1991, IN BOOK 6153 AT PAGE 567. W H PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NW¼ OF SECTION 34 AND THE NE ¼ OF SECTION 33, T4S, R68W OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET_l_OF _L -/// I;; ~ I r t--I g r--v< ,_ W. YI .E A'E. ' j 15:a -l::1; I i; Su bject "' I;; W, BATE A',1 F Prope rty ~ I "' --/ L \ -W DAR 1\111 TH A\,{. N ~~ 1 I ~ X e -I ~~ "' I I ., I I I---< 1w.L, l) I I-- ~ftJ.S.J '/It, 285 / \\( fir I I I ')',,_ SCAU: 1• • T,000' VIC INI TY MA P BACKGROUND Tl-£ 9..JMCT PROPERTY IS COMPOSED Cf NUMEROUS PARCELS LOCA TIO GfNERAlL Y WEST or SOUTH CALAPACO STREET. SOUTH Of WESf BA TE S A'l(NUE. N~TH OF M:ST OARTMOO TH AVtNUE. AN O (AST OF TH E BURLINGTON NOR THERN SANTA F£ RAILROA D AND THE RE GIONAL TRANSP ORTATI~ OISJRlcrs SOU THWEST UGH T RAIL UN[. TOTAL AREA FOR THE SI TE IS 266,6 11 Sf" OR APPROXIM ATELY 6.12 A.OK S. MOST Of TH ( SI T£, ¥.+JI CH IS CIJRREHTlY OWNEO BY W H INI/ESTMENTS, INC., IS CURREN llY ZONE D (1-1) LIGH T INDUSTRIAL, WITH A CP.ANE AND CONSTRUCTI ON COMPANY CURR(NTLY CPER ATIHG ON SIT[. THRCE PARCELS WI TH fROO TAG( ON SOUTH GALAPAGO STREET ARE ZON ED (R-2-B), ME DIUM DENSI TY SINGLE AND MULTI-OYl£LUNG U~T RESlO(NTIA L. THE W H PlO YII LL INTROOUCE ZONING AND OEV[LOPMENT STANDARDS THAT Yr1Ll ALLOW FOR AN D PE RMIT (1 -1 ) USES FOR POSSIBLE FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS AND IN ADD ITION, 'nl ll ADO J.iU LTI-FAMlLY USES ANO DEV£LOPMENT SIANOARDS lHAf ARE APPRCPRIAIE ANO COt-lFORl,IIHG 10 THE SURROUNDIN G USE S IN THE AREA. THE PLANNED UNIT OE'v'ELOPIJ.EN T APPUCATION WILL BE PR oa:ssm PU RSUANT TO THE APP LICABLE OTY REGULATI ONS. GENERA L NOTES 1. AN ALTA SU RVEY WAS PR(PARED BY BASELINE ENGlNEERING COR~ATION ANO IS PAR T Of THIS SUBMI TTAL. 2. A PR[Uiii!NARY ORAINAGf RE PORT WAS PREPARE D BY BASEUN [ ENGINEERING CORPORATION ANO IS PART OF THIS SUBMITTAL J. A TRAfflC R(POO'T WAS PREPARED BY OAS(UN[ [N()N((RINC COOPOOATION AND IS PART Of THI S SUBMITTAL t . THI S PROPERTY DOES NOT LIE WTHIN A 100 -)'[AR FLOOD PLAIN . 5. SlJ 801"1~0N OF THE ~1E SHALL BE COMPLE1EO UNDER SEPARATE DOCUMENT. 6. THE OE>l:LCffR SHALL COMPLY V<Tll All APPUCABlE OTY CODES, REGULATIONS, ANO STANOAROS. 7. IN Tl-IE EVEN T ()=" A CCffi"UCT BET'M:EN THE sPfOflC PROv1Sl<XiS <Y" TH IS PUO ANO TITL E 16, THE SPECIFIC PRO\IISIOOS Of THI S PUD SHALL CONIROL . SITE DA TA TOTAL SIT[ AR[A (11 PAR<l:LS): 266,611 S.F. ~ 6.12 ACR[S PUD DI STRIC T PLAN DEVE LOPM ENT STANDARDS A.Wi£R&._~ UNLESS OTHER'MSE PR0\1DED FCR IN THE PUO OR AN AMENDMENT Tl-lE R[IO, THE PRO\Jl~S. STANDARDS, RE GULATIONS AND PROCEOUR[S PERTINEN T TO AN APPLICATION f OR THE O[V£LOPM[NT OF LANO WllHIN THJS PUO ZONE DISTRICT SHALL COMP LY 'MTH THE (1-1) ZONE DISTRICT ANO THE BE LOW US TEO STANDARDS FOR MUL TI -rAlollLY US[. THE STANOA ROS FOR (H) LIGH T INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT CAN 8£ RffERCNC£D IN IJTLE 16 OF rH[ a rr~ [NQI'MXX) MUNICIPAL COOL 8. PERMITTfP USE S· THE FctLOWINC US(S ARE PER MIII EO fffi THE W H Pl.JD SIT[. UNLE SS OTHER YIISE PR OVIDE D, THE FC:UOWING US[ CA TEGORIE S ANO TYPES SHALL HA.V[ TH[ SAME MEANINGS AS SUCH CA T[GOR Y ANO US£ 1ERMS BY Tl<( SAME NAUES CONIAJ NEO IN 111LE 16 Of lH[ ENGI.El\000 MUNIOPAL COOL PERMITTE D USES ARE 5'JBJ:C T TO ALL APPLICABLE REClJLATIDNS Of TITLE 16 -UNIFIED DE>l:LOPM[N I COOL RE~DENIIAL USES, GRO UP LIVING r ACI LITY, LARGE /SPECIAL GROUP LIV1 NG f"AOUTY, SMALL ONE UNIT OR MULT I-UNll DWE LLING AS ALiOYiE D IN THE R-2-B ZON l DISTRICl LIVE/WORK D'M'.LLI NG LOW, MEDIUM ANO HIQ-1 DE NSI TY MU L n-UNIT OW£LUNGS MULTI -FAMIL Y R(LA TE D AN CI LLAR Y USES SUCH AS LEASIN G OFFIC(, PRIVAT( R(CREAUON FACILI TIES, ETC. PUBLIC/JN STI TUTl()UL u ses: A TH LET!C FIELD COMMU NITY GARDEN LIBRARY IJUS£UM PARK AND OPE N SP AC[ R(LIGIOUS INSTITU TI ONS AN O ASSOC IATED ACCESSOR Y USES SCHOOLS TE LECO t.!M UN !CAllON FAOUTY (S([ CH>.PT£R 16-7, -Tfl£COMAJUN/CAT10NS. -FOR APPUCA8l£ VSE-REl ATfO C/1/0£/./N[S AMO STANOA/10S), TO !NO.UDE Al 1ERN A TI;{ TOWE R STRU CTURE , ANTENNA (MICROWA'IE AN1ENMA, S(C I OOIZED PANEL ANTENNA, '1,HJP ANTENNA) ANO TO'M:R srnucTUR[ IRAN~ 1 CEN rER l ii "' L en & ~N IY o DENl'ER\ ARAPAII OC C lUN1 _., ~-1 / COMMEROAL US£S: \ l1l!!ILJi W H INl'ES TUEN TS , INC 3002 S. HURON ST. [NGL[WOOD, CO 80 11 0 ~ BASELINE ENGINEERING COOP . 700 11TH ST., SUITE 210 GOLDEN, CO 80-401 ~NC[ HARRIS, AJCP (303) 202-5010 ,217 EOOtlEEB. BASELINE ENGINEERING CORP. 700 12TH ST., SUITE 220 GOLDEN. CO 80401 NOAH N[MM(RS. PE. (JOl) 940-9966 ,207 GR(ENHOUSE/NURSERY, RA!SING Of PLANl S, FLO"WERS, OR NURSE.R Y STOCK ASSEMB LY HALL OR AUOITORIU!d, HALL RENTAL FOR MEE TINGS OR SOC1AL OCCASIONS MEMBER SHI P ORGANIZA TI ON INDOOR ENTERTAINMEN T/ Ati.l USE ME NT AMList MENT ESTABLISHMENT AS A CONDITIONAL USE PHYSI CAL FI IH[SS C[NTER/SPA lHEA1£R AND PERFOR MANCE/CONCERT VENUE, NOT INO.UOING ADULT ENTIRTAJNMENT GtNtR A.L OUTDOOR RECRtA TION, AS A CON DITIONA L USE CHEO< CASH ING FAOUT Y FINANOAL INSTITUTION, WlTH ORIV[-TH ROOGH SERVI CE FIN ANCIAL INSTITUTION, WlTHOUT DRIVE-THROUGH SERVI CE r ooo ANO O(V(R AG[ SERVIC(, INCLUDING: BRE\\f>UB CA J[RER MICROBR[WE:RY RE STAURANT , BAR, TA"VtRN 'MTH ~ 'IIITI-IOUT OOTD~ OPERATIONS RESTAURANT, ~TH DRIVE -THROUGH S£R\1C[ TAKE OUT ND DQlvf.RY ONl Y MEOICAL ANO SCIENTIFIC Q"'1C HOSPITAL LABOOATORY (DENTAL, UffilCAI.. OR OPTIC.'.L) Of flCE, TYPE 1 (GENERAL) CHIC[. TYPE 2 {LI MITED) ORY Ct EANER, DROP-OFF SITE ONLY INS TRU CTI ONAL SERV1 CE PERSONAL CARE S(RV!CE, INCLUDING PHOTOCRAPHY STUDIO AND PHOTO LAB, UPHOLSTERY, PRINTER, LOCKSMITH, TAILOO RE PAI R SHOP RETAIL SALES AND SERVICE (SALE S), INCLUDI NG, ANTIQU E STORE ART GAUERY BUY-BACK, S(COOO~HAND, IHRIFI, 00'-ISl~MENI SlORES, LARGE 8UY-8ACK, SECCt-10 -HANO, THRIFT, CONSIGNM(NT STCRES, SMALL QON;{Nl[NCE STORES GROCERY/SPEOAJJIY FOOD STORE IN TERNET SAlfS LOCATION LIQUOR STIR: RETAIL SALE S, G[N[RAL MEROI ANOISE: TRADE OR BUSINESS SCHOOL RA.01 0/TELEVIS!ON BROADCASTING STUOt O, RECORO ING/FllM STUDIO AUTOMOTI'v!: SER ~CE STATION (GASOLINE fAClll l'() CAR WASH, AUTO DETAILI NG PAR KING FAC1U IY, STRUCIUR[ (DPER<BLE 'vrn!CLES), PRINCIPAL USE PARK ING AR EA. SURfACE (OPER ABL[ 'IEHICLES). PR INCIPAL USE HOT(L HOT(L. EXTENDED STA Y (US[S CONTINUED ON NEX T PACE ) SHEET INDEX P1 -GO',{R / IJ1SIR1CT PLAN P2 -01S'IRICT PLAN / ARCHll!CTURAL !WAGE S I< DETALS PJ -DOSTING S11[ PLAN P4 -OONC[PTUAL IM.TI-rAMllY grr PLAN PROPERTY OVl£R W H INVESTMENTS, INC., A COlORAOO CORPffiA nON BY: Flo YD 'MNsl.OW, JR ., I.Act PREslDEN I STATE Of COI.ORADO COUNTY OF THE FOR[GONG INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNO'-M.IDGEO BE.rOR E ME TMIS ___ DAY Of =~==~-, 20_ BY FLQ'rJ) Yr1NSL,QW .R-\IIC[ PRfSIDENT FOR W H IN'tfSTMfNTS INC WITNESS MY HAHD AND OfflCI AL SEAL NOTAR Y PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPtRtS: APPROIJ[D FOR THE OTY OF EN GLE.WOOD PLANNING ANO ZOOING COMMISSIOO CHAIRPERSON PLANNING ANO ZONING COM MISSION RtCOONG SECRETARY DA Tt MAYOR Of tNGLtWOOO DA TE ATTESTED THE FOREGOI NG APPROVALS 'M:RE ACKNO'M...EOG£0 BffORE ME THIS __ CAY OF ______ 20_ BY ________ _ AND _____________ _ AfltSt: di? dtRK CURK ANO RE CORDER EXHIBIT A LLI -J II Z : -l -I 'i LLI ~ I· V) ·i ~1 <( 1 ~"' r cc d ~"' ' ~ :::; ' p u I I I t > I!!" < g 0 e ,. .. I a /!'i 0 z ~ ~ I ~ le "' ' ! s, ~ 5 ~ i,; z ::, j 0 u g 3:: -I!:: ~ ! 'j '-" ] z w "-0 -~ ~ u Jlll!PNlfll~MOIIIEel' .....,_., ,oft Ml> OM IOWJ" a, THI S PLANNED UNIT l)[l,{LOP~ENT IS ACC£Ptt0 F~ Fll.lNG 1N TH[ 0F f"I C£ OF 1A111N 0allPOIU.11CN THE QER!( ANO RECORDER Of ARAPAHOC COUNTY, STATE Of C<l.OOAOO, Al .....,_ ......,., 9/21/11 _____ O'ClOC~-~io~ THIS ____ DAY Of == 24• x J6" RECE PTION NO. --------~ BOOK NO. PAGE NO. BY, Q.ERK y, 0£.PUTY 8ASUJII[ .. .,, Pl100 ---200J'U0 2012-10-21.,h,g HlTlor4 P1 • • • PUD DI STRICT PLAN DEVE LOPMEN T STAND ARD S (CON TINU ED ) INDUSlRIAL USES: WHQ.ESALE SALES ANO DISTRI8UTION INDU STRIAL SER\10:, LIGHT WANUf AC TIJRINC (INCl.UOlN G PROCE SStNG, FABRI CATION OR ASSE MEILY), LICHT lilANUfACTURI NC {INCl.UOIN G PROCE SSI NG, FABRI CATION OR ASSE MBLY), HEAVY MOW<G ANO STORAGE oomorn SIORAQ:. STCMAGE YAAOS Fri< VEHICLES, EQUIPMEN T, MATERIAL. ANO/OR SUPPU(S. INCLUDI NG CONTRACTOR Offl CE "NO YARO WAREHOOSINC ANO/OR STORACE. INO..UOINC M4NI-STORAG£ COMMEROAL STORM:£, SAlE S ANO R[PAIR C1' CffRAfl.E \t:Hta..ES ANO ECI.J,PM(N T ACC£SSOilY use, HOME OCCUPATION AS USl[D IN ENGI.I WOOC MUNICIPAL CODE nru 16 -u,rnm OE'¥0..CPI.IENT COOE IOl?ORARY US[S: AS US1£D IN ENG!i\>000 MUIICIPAI. COD£ TU 16 -urtnEO DEVELOPMEN T COOE UN LISTED USES: PROC£0UR ES FOR APPROVAL OF USE S NOT LISTED IN THE AOO\t: PE R~IITTO VS£S SHAU BE 00'6NEO BY TlllE 16 PRCMSK)NS FCR UNUSTEO USES. C. lM!l!JSllll,ll,UliES_J,& .. SllliSEI ()NC[ AND IF A CERmcm or 000..l'ANCY (CO) IS ISSU ED FOR ANY RE~D EN TI AL US£ ON ANY P{flTION <F THE PROPUlTY COVERED BY THS PUD. llHETH[R lHE f'RtffRTY ~ PLATTED OR NOT, IN DU STR1AL US£S (NOT COM•El<CIAL OR PUBUC/INSTITUllONAL) SHALL NO LONGER 8[ i\LLOl\£0. 0. D£\O..(PM£NT STANDARDS· l o. SI NGLE FAMILY ANO ATTAOiEO TOYINHOM[ USE •. usr ENGI.I'IIOOO MUNIOPAI. COOE REFERENCES FOR M R-2-B ZO,,C DISTRICT 10. W LTI -UN!T RESIOOHIAL DWELLINGS o. MAXIMUM ElJLOING HOGHT: 75'-0" b. SfTBACXS: All PUD SfTBACKS HlR MULTI-fAIILY usrs SHAl.l BE 2'-o· "''" lHE EXCEPTION Of: W H PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT A P ARC EL OF LAN D LOCATED IN THE NW ¼ OF SECTION 34 AND THE NE ¼ OF SECTION 33, T4S, R68W OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE , STATE OF COLORADO SHEET_2_0F_4_ DISTRICT PLAN / AR CHITECTURAL IMAGES & DETAILS THE EASTERN sm BOUNDARY ALON G SOUTH GALAPAGO STR[El FRO~ l'll'ST BATE S AVENU E TO 'n(Sl COR NELL A\l(N U[: s·-o· ii. TH[ EASTERN 9iE BOUNDARY ALONG SOO TH GALAPAr,Q STREET FR OM v.£Si C~NEL<. -'1/'ENU E 10 WE ST DARTMOU TH Av(NUE: 10'-o • TH[ l\£Sl[RII sm BOUNDARY: S'-o• c. DlNSI IY: MAXl.ruM 4> DWt.LUNG UNllS PlR AClll (45 OU/A CMl) d FLOOR AREA/UNIT: MIN IMUM 550 SQUARE rm e . MAXIMUM flOM AR[A RAno N<H: f. MINIMUM CPEN $P AC£ (IHO..UOES SIDEWALKS): 25X g . l,ON MUM LOT IMC>lH: NON( 2. COUU ERCIAL/ll<OUSTl!IAL o. Ot:~LOPMENT STANDARDS Fell COIIMERO AI. Cl< INDlJSTR1Al US€S SH Al.l COll'LY 1'11 1H rn , Ot:~LOPMENT REGULATIONS OU ILINED Fell lllE (MU -8-1) .,xrn-usr C[N TRAL BUSff:SS ,;:o (1-1) UGH INDUS'TRIAL DISIDICTS rOOHO IN mu: 16 Cf" me CNG!.D\000 UNfCD OC\11.0PMCHT COO(_ !>. MAXNJM 81.JlOtN G Hf)()if: N(N: c. S£T8ACKS: 10' -o• fM M..1. HON -RES!0£N TI AL US£S J. LANDSCAPI NG 0. A COMPL.fl[ LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED AT TIME Of SU BIITTAI. Of FV<AI. sm PLAN . '-PARKI NG a. PARKING CUOO.JNES Wll BE PREPARED BASED ON. FU TURE ~LOPMENT USE ANO WLL 8£ 9..IIMITTED WHH A ANAi. sm Pt.AN AN D YIILL unoZE TITLE 16 Of 11'[ ENGI.IIIOOO UNIFl EO Ot:~LOPMENT COO( AS A BAS S. REDUC TION Of PARKI NG MAY BE PROPOSED FOR MULTI -UNlT Dlfl.UNGS 5. PUil.JC LA l-0 OEOICA Tl ONS REOUIREMENTS a. PARKS , TRA.1...S. At() CPEN SPACE LAND OEOiCATirii SHALL 8[ OE:TERM INEO BY SEPAAATE ACRHMENT AT TIME OF FINAL SITE PLAN. £. .ARCH1 T£Cfi /RA\ SJANQARQS· fORi.t AND MATERIALS FOR MUUI-FAMILY HOUSING SHALl HARMON IZE 'M TH THE AOJAC£Nl RESIOENTIA'. BUI LD HCS ANO BE COHSIOERA T[ ~ NElQiB OR lNG BUILDINGS. SUBMITTED AS A PART ~ THE PR~D PUO AAf.. EXAt.fU PHOTOGRAPHS INDICA ll NG TH[ r.EH ERAl l[lJ£L Of" DESI GN OUAUT Y, Rff9-l[S AHO MA TERIA LS TO BE IHC(JlP(RA TED IN Tri [ PRO.£.Cl 1. FACAOC S.: Exrt.RIOR WAl..lS GREATER 1HM 50 FUT 1H l£NCTH SH OOLD BRCAK ~y FLAT, MCHOJTHC FAG!,()[ WITH DISCERNI BLE ARClill[CTlJRAL ELEMENIS. BlALDING DE~CNS, ROOl'UNE S, OR FAGA DE TREATMENTS THAT ARE MONOT(),100 S AR E STRONGLY DISC OURAG ED. BUILDING fA~AOE S OOIEN TEO 10 THE STREET OR PUBLIC SP ACC SHOJL0 PROVI0[ AHOtl !(CIURAl VARI LI Y ANO SCALL UY INCOHPCRA.f !NC [L(M (NI S SU CII AS UAY YIINOO WS. DOORWA YS, ENTRANCE S ANO WINDO"NS. BALCON IE S, CORNIC(S, CCX..UMN S, VERTICA L PLANE BRE AKS, ANO OlH[R TYPES Of ARCHITECTURAi. OET~UNG 10 PRO~OE ~SUAL IN1£REST. 2. 360-D EGREE: A BUILDING'S SPE CI AL ARCHI TECTURAL FEATURES AND TREA TMENTS SHALL NOT BE RE STRI CT[O TO A SIN GLE FAl;A DE. All SlOE S OF A BUILD ING ()"EN TO VI EW BY THE PUBLIC, WHETH ER VI E'ft(O FROM PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PROP£RTY, SHALL DISPLA Y A 9MILAR LEVEL Of QUALITY AND ARCHl1£C11JRAL IN1£REST. ARCH11£C11JRAI. FEATURES SUCli AS WHOOWS, AWNINGS, PROJECTIO'I S, REVEA LS, CHANC[S IN PATTERN, ANO TREWS£S SHOOLD BE USED ON All SDES FOR 'ITSUAL IN1£REST. lH E OI ME~ONS or BA S€. MIDOII, AHO TOP 51-+()JLD OC CARRICO AROONO fRc».I me PRIMARY r~AOCS TO me SIOC ANO RCAR or THE 8JIL04NC. 1 IUT ROOrS: DC5K1f Q.CMEN15 FOR IUT ROO" OUILDlHGS SHlAJLD INQJAJ[ PARN'[TS >WlH VARIABU HOQf1 N<D/OR CHANGES IN Sl:IBACX, WrlERI: POSS1BU. ROOFTOP AREAS ARI: EN COURAGID TO 0C US£0 FOR PU8UC M PRIVATE OUTDOOR SPACE . I . SI.OPCD ROOFS: 1110/ SlOPEO ROOFS AR[ USED, AS LEAST ON( or TII( FOU.OVIING El[M[N TS SHOU LD BE INCORPQRAl[D INTO THE DCSJG.S INCLUD ING PRQ..{CTING GASlES, HIP$ HOPlZONTAI./V[J<lTCAL BREAl<S, Cl< 0116 SIMUR T[Oi NIOUCS. ROOf St lAPC'S SHOOI..D BE AN INT[GRAL. PAR T Cf" TI1C: BUILDING ARO HTECTURC Ni> CREAtr IHTER£SDNC NIJ VARED APPE:ARAHC£S. 5. BRIGHT C<l..CRS: INT[N S£, BR!OH. ~ FlUOOESCENT OOJ)RS SHCU.0 HOT BE USED AS THE PRE:OCMNANT CCX.CR ~ IMY WALL. OR RO<»" CJ" "'4Y PRIMARY CR ACCE~Y S rRUC TUR£. 6. BUILDING MATERIALS: EXTERI OR 8UILOINC FA(,AOES SH(XJLD EXHIBIT HIGH LEVELS Cf" DESIGN, DETAILI NG, Alt) MATERIAL QUALI TY. A MIX OF HIGH OOAUTY COMPATIBL£ MATERIALS IS STRONGl.Y ENCOORAGE:0 OH ALL FACADE S FAONG STREETS, OR OTHER PUBLIC SPACE S ~ AREAS. BUILOINCS SHOOLO BE CONSTRUCTED Cf" WRABU, IICH -OUAIJTY ijAl[RIA LS SU CH AS: ORICl<. STONE, ARCHI1£CTURAL PRE -CA ST CONCRC1£. ARClllTCCTURAI.LY CAST C()lQl[TE, CAS T STONE, IN1£GRAI.LY COLOO£D SPLIT OR GROUND FAC( CONCR[l[ MASON RY UII TS, STU CCO OR ElfS (EXTERIOR INSUlA1£D fi<ISHNG SYS1£M), ARCH l1£CTURAI. METAL. IIOOO. LAP SIDING. OR ANY COMBINATION or 1HE MATERlAI.S US1£0. 7. SCALING: BIJIL.DNG FA(,A()[S 51-tOULD INO.lff A COMB INATION OF DETAILS TO ENHANC( THE ARO-IIT£CTURAL. IN TERESL FOR EXAMPLE, US£ BRK)(WQRK TO CR£A 1£ UNIQU E El.EMEN TS, OR MtX MA fERIAL S OF VARYING DEPTH 10 PROVIOE '1SUAI. INl[R[ST . F.!'!!Q!;lli 1. 9 1[ Pl.AN: A RHAI. 91[ PLAN FOR RES1D£N TI AL tJS[S WILL BE REVl [l\£0 FOR APPROVAi. IN ACCO<OANC£ WTH fr-11S POO Att1 ITS STANDARDS BY M Pl.ANN ING COM IJISSIOH Ylt TH A R(COl,IM[NOATION TO OTY COU NOL OJY COONOL 'M U MAKE A ANAL OEOSION REGARDING APPROVAL CE A SI TE PLAN . If" AN Y snr PLAN IS SUBSIIIEO FCll PU BUC~NSII IU II ONAL. COM "ER QAI., OR INOUSIIII AL USES, II \\1LL ll[ PROCE SSEO AOMIN IS TRATIVC LY AS ALL Olfl£0 BY THE UN IFIED DE VELCf'MENT COO£. 2. ijOOlr lCA TIONS " THE FCt LOVt'ING ijQDl n CA TIO N PROCEDUR ES ARf Cct,ISISTENT VtllH THE PUO MOOlfl CA TION PROCE DURE S <F TH[ CI TY OF [NGL[\\00D nm 16, ZONIN G REOJ LATI ONS, AS MOOIFIED BELOW: o. DI STRI CI PLAN: THE TERM S, CDNOITIONS, l HE ADOP TED PUD DISTRI CT PLAN AND DOCUMENTS MAY ll[ OMNCl'.O AND/OR AIIENOE D IN Vt-1-ICU OR IN PART AS FCUOWS: i. MINOR MOOlrl CAllOOS ro THE PUO DI STRIC T PI.M: TH E CITY lr,MNAGER OR HI S/HER OESIGHE£ lr.l AY APPROVE Ml~ MOOIFICATI ONS IN TH[ LOCATION, SI ZING, ANO HEIGH OF STRUCTUR[S OR fAOU Tl[S If REQUIRED BY ENClNEERINC OR OlllER QRCUMSTANr.Es NOT fORES[[N AT Tll [ TI ME Tll[ PUO DISTRICT PLAN WAS APPROVED. MIHOR MOOIFICATKJNS SHAU.. NOT BE PERM ITTED IF TH( MOOlflCAOOH RESULTS ltl AN Y iX THE CIROJM ST.ANC ES LISTED 1H E.2..b.i or THIS PUD. MA.JOO MOOlflCA TI<»tS TO Tl-I [ PUD DISTRI CT PLAN: MAXlR MOOIFICA nc»,1S l,,IA y BE l,IAO( TO TH( APPR OVED PUD D,STRlCT PLAN PURSUANT 10 lHE SAIi£ UMITA TIONS AHO REOUIR[M(NTS BY WlfCH Pl.ANS AND DOCU\4EN TS ¥1CRE OR IGI NAl..l Y APPROVED. b. Si lt Pl.AN: i. MINM ...OO lflCATI OftS fO TH( PUO SI T[ PLAN: THE QTY, TH ROU GH J}t[ OCVUCJ>Mf"N T RfVl[W r£AM, MAY AUTl<ORIZE DE VIATIONS FR OM TH[ PU O ~1[ PLAN Wrl [N SUCH Drn ATI ONS APPEAR NEC(SSARY IN LIGH T OF TECH NI CAL ffi ENGIN[.[RlNC CONst>£RAOONS. MINOR OE'vlATIONS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED IF ~y ~ THE ORCUUSTANCES RESULf: i.e. A Oi"'4CE IN "ni( OiARACTER CJ" TH( 0€VELOPME:Nl; M i.b. A CliANGE ~ THE PEIMTTED lANO USES: OR i.~ A CHANGE IN lH[ GENERAL LOCA 110N or LAND US£S; Cl< l.d. AN INCR(ASE IN THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ~ ANY BUI LDING Of MORE THAN 5%; OR i.e . AN INCR(AS( 1N lHE NUMBER CX" DYICLUNG UNITS, OR IN THE RA TIO Of TH£ GROSS flOOR AREA Cl--S IRU C fl.IRES TO THE LANO AREA, OR INCREASES IN fHE PROPOS[I) GROSS FLOOR AREA YIITHIN ANY PARTICULAR LANO US[ or MORE Tl<AN 2:11: OR i.f. A REDUCTION IN THE SETBACKS MORE THAN 10%; OR i.g. AN INCREASE CJ" IAORE THAN 1or., IN GROUND COv(RAG£, BY STRUCMES OR SURfAa: PARJ<i<G; OR i.h. A REDUC TION BY MORE Tl<AN 5% IN M LANO AREA OE SIGN A 110N FOR LANDSCAPING; OR i.i. A REOU COCli BY MOR E THAN 5% IN THE RA TIO Of <ff-STREET PARKING AND LOADING SPACE 10 GROSS FLOCM AREA CM NUM8£R or D'IRUNG UNI TS ii. SIT£ PLAN AME NDMENTS NO T MEETING TH E ABOVE R£0U IR£MENTS; AU. Pt.J D SITE PLAHS APPROVED AN D RECORDED MIY ON LY Bl AMENDED PURSU AN T TO THE SAME U .. TATION 00 REOU IRE WEN TS BY ll!ilCli SU Cli Pl.ANS l'll'RE APPROVED. MU L 11-F AMIL Y AR CHITECTUR AL EXAMPLES P2 P2 L&J go .! z JI ii .. -C -I g .5! ... L&J go I· "C ~1 V) ~ <( ]' ~" r cc fl li!o.: ' ~::, ' F~ u p p - w I,! ~ ~ $ ► CD ; il i ~ ';1 '!; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ie "' ~ ' ! u ~ a ;'.: 1'I z ::, I 0 u w 0 ~ :r: "" V, a.. ... "" .....J er .., ;;,: ""t-~ I-w ~ ~~ 0 oil a..i,( V, ~I w 0 <( ~ .....J a.,, <( ~ a:: t::: => I-z ... u ::, ~ I=! :i: a ~ u I.LJ a:: z <( z ! ------~ = ~I z <( .....J ~ a.. I--u g 3: 13 a:: I-0 V, rs ! i5 13 ~ ] 13 -;'.: ~ u ~I.NIUl -.«CRCT ........ ., NTW. aarnM.. 9/'r.J/11 _,,_ BAS<Ull ...... -- 24" X J6" Pl 200 200JU) 1011-10-29.dwg NrT 2 OI 4 P2 • • • LCGE ND PUO BOUNDARY ------rNTrRICR PARCELS ------EASEMENTS -------ALIQUOT UN[ RAL RO~O ---~ --AOJAC(NT PARCCLS CONl OU R LI NE W H PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NW ¼ OF SECTION 34 AND THE NE ¼ OF SECTION 33, T4S, R68W OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, ST ATE OF COLORADO SHEET_3_0F ____i__ EXISTING SITE PLAN N GRAPHC SCALE 50 0 50 A A A I (~ FUT) 11NCH•50n 100 I EXISTING SITE PLAN w ~ I z a II ~ -.. ....I -~ .5! Cl. w .r I· V, ! ~1 < ]' ~"' r al ~1 I! 0: ; ; ::> ; 1~ I .!::_ i 3: w p ~~ < ~ 0 ~ 1;; I cl i ! i ~ ! ~; I ; ! i ~ ~ z ::, I 0 u NTW.-...n'M. g~/12 MA-aa: 24"X.36" --8ASEut< .am. Pl.200 --200....PW 2012-10-2!1.d-.q auT .J <»' 4 P3 • • • 2' S[ SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. THIS SITE PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL ANO IS A REPR ESE NTATI ONAL DEPIC TI ON Of ONE POSSIBLE ALTE RN AT IVE FOR DEVELOPMEN T. 2. THE SlTE DA TA TABL E AND SCHEDULE Of UNITS AND PARKING SPACES ARE BASED ON THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN. 3. SlTE DATA TABLE SQUARE FOO TAG E INCLU DES PL ATTED RIGHT OF WAY 111THIN PUO BOU NDARY. LANDSCAPING NOTES : 1. TO TAL PR0\10[0 LANDSCA PE AREA CALCU LATIONS ARE BASED ON THE CONCEPTUA L SITE PLAN. A FINAL LAN DSCAPE PLAN \\I LL BE SUBMITTED 111TH A FINAL SITE PLAN . 2. EXAC T DESIGN INQ UOI NG LOCATION OF TIRE ES, SHRUBS, PL ANTI NG BEDS , ETC. l\1LL BE DETE RMINED AT TI ME OF FINAL DES IGN. 3. LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW PRELIMIN ARY CON CEP T ANO PLANTS MA Y BE PLACED ANY PLACE WITHIN THE SlTE BOUNDAR Y. 4. PLANTS SHA LL BE USED THAT ARE WELL ADAPTED TO COLORA DO'S CLI MATE . FOLLO\\ING THE OTY Of ENGLE WOOD LANDSCAPE MANUAL'S RECOMM ENDA TION S IS ENCOURAGED. 5. TR EE S LOCATED IN TH E STREE T BUFFER SHALL BE SPACED A MINIMUM OF 30'. LEGE ND PUD BOL!ND.A.RY ------S(f8ACKS TYPE EXIS TING CURB STREETSCAPE 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 INTERIOR LANOSCAPE INTERIOR LAND SC AP ING ~ STR EHSCA?( BUILDINGS PARKING TOTAL W H PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NW ¼ OF SECTION 34 AND THE NE ¼ OF SECTION 33, T4S, R68W OF THE 6TH P.M ., CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO SlTE DATA TABL E AREA (SQUARE FEE T) PERCENT (%) 22,822 8 109,154 38 67,107 23 90,875 31 289,958 100 SHEET_LOF _L CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN SCHEDULE OF UNITS AND PARK ING TYPE QU ANTITY RESIDENTI AL UNIT S 224 PARKING SPACES 226 N S. GALA.PAGO ff. GRJJ>HIC SCALE 50 (IN Fm) 11NCli•50fT 100 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN w lil' z I II .,. -·i ...J if. w -f I· V) ~1 <( E ~'" r al §I Ii!-= ~ ~ :l' ' I IS .~ i IS p ~~ ~~ /;; I 3 i ~ "' ~ I ' :i. o:'. ! ie "' ' ! I i'= <>I z => J 0 u FOIi ,,e ON IOW.I' t6 --"" lfflM.s.aaTTN. 9/TJ/12 MA-IIZIE 24" X .36" --'"'""' Pl200 ---200....POO :ZOl2-10-251.dwq P4 • COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: Ordinance rezoning W H Investments parcel from Light Industrial January 22, 2013 11 a i {l-1) and Low Density Single and Multi- Dwelling Unit Residential (R-2-B) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) INITIATED BY: STAFF SOURCE : Community Development Audra L. Kirk, Planner I COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION Council continued the first reading concerning the proposed W H Investment Planned Unit Development on December 1 7, 2012, in order for staff to work with the applicant to modify the PUD to address the concerns of the Planning and Zoning Commission. PREVIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION • The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the W H Investment PUD at a Public Hearing on November 20, 2012. The C ommission considered public testimony and voted 7 to 2 against forwarding the proposed rezoning to PUD to -City Council with a recommended action for approval with the following conditions: • 1. Final site plan approval will happen at a later date and will need to receive Planning and Zoning approval and City Council approval 2. Delete the word townhome on C.1 a on Page 1. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends approval of the ordinance rezoning the W H Investments parcel from 1-1 and R-2-B to PUD. The attached Council Bill would approve a modified PUD District Plan that addresses the issues identified by the Planning and Zoning Commission . Staff further recommends that Council set February 4, 2013 as the date for a Publi c Hearing. BACKGROUND The Planned Unit D eve lopment is a rezoning process that establishes specific zoning and site planning criteria to meet the needs of a specific development proposal that may not be accommodated within existing zoning de ve lopment regulations. A PUD rez o ning provides the opportunity for unified development control fo r multiple properties or multiple uses. This pl"Op e l'ly is a 6.12 c1ne sit e occupied Winslow Construction Compan y since 1954. The parcels h ave • been zoned Industrial sin ce th e first zoning was put in place in 1940. PUD OVERVIEW The Sand Creek PUD will chang e th e Permitted Prin c ipa l Us es to all ow res id enti al c1nd ce rtain public/institutional, commercial and Industrial uses as ou tlin e d in the attac hed Ordinan ce and PUD Distri c t Plan . Som e us e s n ot allowed und er the curr ent zon in g, such as libraries, hav e b ee n included in th e list of allowed uses. A suns et clau se has be en added l o th e PUD approval ordinance that stipulates when a Certificate of O ccupan cy (CO) is is sued for any r es id en tial use on any portion of the property covered by this PUD, wh ether th e property is platt ed o r not, industrial uses (not commercial or public/institutional) shall no lon ge r b e all owed. Th e site plan has been submitt ed for conceptual purposes o nly. A site plan for resid entia l uses will need Planning and Zoning Commi ss io n r eview and Council approva l. A site plan for any us e other than residential will not require review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. With the exception of a few public/institutional uses and conditional uses , all sit e plans for uses in the 1-1 zone districts currently are reviewed administratively and the PUD proposes no change to this procedure. Development standards have b ee n outlined in the PUD District Plan and are as follows: Th e maximum dwelling units p er ane is proposed to be set at 45, resulting in a maximum of 2 7 5 units . In add iti on to allowing indu stria l and multi-family, the proposed WH Investm ent PUD would also allow sin gle family residential and attached townhomes. Residential units that are attached and more than one unit are con sidered multi-unit dwellings. Staff believes that the single family residentia l units should be r egu lated under the dimensional standards of the R-2-B zone district and the attached townhomes should be regulated under the W H Investment PUD Development Standards of th e multi-unit residential dwellings. On page 1 of attachment under C.1.a, the word townhome should be deleted. Th e proposed W H Investm ent PUD has set the maximum height limitation for multi-family residential at 75 '. The Unified Developm ent code (UDC) has a maximum height limitation of 32' in all residential zo ne districts. This is a difference of 43' or approximately 4 stories. The setbacks for W H Investment PUD have the m inimum setback listed as 2', with the exception of a 5' to 1 O' setback along the east and west property lines. The 2' setback would be required along the north and south property lines. The UDC has a minimum setback of 5' for any residential zone district, with the exception of a small lot of record. The development standards for the industrial uses shall be consistent with the U DC requirements in the 1-1 zone district with the exception of the setbacks. The proposed PUD will have a required minimum setback of 1 O' from all property lin es. The UDC requires a 1 O' setback only where a building abuts upon, adjoins, or is adjacent to a residential zone district. The proposed W H Investment PUD would not have a height limitation with an industrial use. The architectural standards that are outlined in the PUD are very similar and/or more stringent to the architectural standards for multi-unit residential uses listed in the UDC. • • • Procedures for minor modifications to the PUD are consistent with the UDC, and are typically reviewed by the Development Review Team and approved through the permitting process. Major modifications to the PUD are also consistent with UDC and require Planning and Zoning and City Council approval. Major modifications are required under the following circumstances: • A change in the character of the development; or • A change in the permitted land uses ; or • A change in the general location of land uses; or • An increase in the maximum height of any building of more than 5%; or • An increase in the number of dwelling units , or in the ratio of the gross floor area of structures to the land area, or increases in the proposed gross floor area within any particular land use of more than 2%; or • A reduction of more than 5% in the land area designation for landscaping; or • A reduction by more than 5% in the ratio of off-street parking and loading space to gross floor area or number of dwelling units. Landscaping: A complete landscaping plan will be provided at time of final submittal of the site plan. Parking: Parking guidelines will be prepared based on future development use and will be submitted with the final site plan. The developer may ask for a reduction in parking for multi-family housing due to the proximity of light rail. • FINANCIAL IMPACT • The financial impact will be different under the various development scenarios allowed under this PUD, so it is difficult to provide information at this time . LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission Findings of Fact Bill for Ordinance • MEMORAN D U M TO: Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: ., Alan White1 Director1 Community Dev elopment \// FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: Audra L. Kirk1 Planner 1 ✓ November 201 2012 Case ZON2012-007 -Public Hearing Sand Creek Case ZON2012-008 -Public Hearing WH Investments Baseline Corporation 700 12 th Street Suite 220 • Golden1 CO 80401 • PROPERTY OWNER SANDCREEK: Sand Creek lnvestors1 L.L .C 3002 South Huron Street Englewood, CO 80110 PROPERTY OWNER W H INVESTMENTS: W H lnvestments1 Inc. 3002 South Huron Street Englewood, CO 80110 PROPERTY ADDRESS SANDCREEK (North Property): 601 West Bates Avenue Englewood 1 CO 80110 PROPERTY ADDRESSES W H INVESTMENTS ( South Property): 700 West Cornell Avenue 775 West D ar tmouth Avenue 300 11 30 11 and 3025 South Galapago Str eet 3002 1 30 18 and 3050 South Huron Street Englewood 1 CO 80110 10 00 Englewood Parkway Englewood, Co lo rado 80110 PHONE 303-762-2342 FAX 303-783-6895 www.englewoodgov.org REQUEST: Th e ;:ipp li c 1nt ha s subn iitted two applicati o ns, Sand Creek PUD (refe rred to as th e north property) and W H ln ves t111ents PUD (r e fe rr ed to as the south property) to rezone the abov e par ce ls from 1-·1 Li g ht Industrial and 1-2 General Industrial zon in g to a PUD Planned Unit Dev e lo p111e nt Th e proposed PUD ,,viii allow 111ulti -fam ily r es id e ntial as a per111itted u se, in Jclclition to ex i stin g indu strial p c 1-rnitl ed u ses. Conceptua l sit e plans h ave b ee n submitte d because d eve lo p111 e nt o n 1h e two sit es lik e ly w ill n o t happ e n in th e n erH t e rm . As m;irket co ndition s evo lve in th e fulur e, sit e p la n s a n d deta il s m z1y c ha n ge . The ;ipp li ca nt i s see king app ro va l of th e co n ce ptual sit e p l an s; h oweve r, th e plan s hJ ve n o t pr ov id e d C ity staff with e nough detJi l to provide meaningful r ev i ew comments. Staff is r e comm e ndin g th at w h e n dev e l opm e nt i s more certain in th e f uture, site plans be r ev iewed at public h ea 1·ings c1 nd b efo r e Pl ~1nning a nd Zoning a nd C ity Council. The Pl a nning and Zoning Co mmi ss i o n can r eco rnrnend an alternative. RECOMMENDATIONS NORTH PROPERTY: Th e Departm e nt o f Community Developm e nt r eco mm end s th at the Planning a nd Zon in g Co111m iss ion approve Sa nd C r ee k PUD Di stri c t Pl a n with th e followin g conditi o ns: 1. Final site plan a pproval will happ e n at a late r date and will n ee d to r ece ive Plannin g and Zon in g approval and City Counc il ap prov a l, and forward a r ec ommendation of approva l t o C ity Co uncil. RECOMMENDATIONS SOUTH PROPERTY: • Th e Department of Com munity Dev elopm e nt r eco mrnend s th at the Planning and Zoning • Comm iss ion approve W H Inv es tm e nt PUD Di stri c t Plan with the following co nditions: 1. Final site plan approva l will happen at a late r date a nd will need t o re ce ive Planning and Zonin g a ppr ova l and City Council a pproval, 2 . Provide spa ce for the future p lacement of RTD 's Bate s Street Light Rail Station platform. 3. Single family r esidential units should b e r eg ulated under the dimensional standards of the R-1-C zone district And forward a recommendation of approva l to City Council. LEGAL DESCRIPTION NORTH PROPERTY: THAT PART OF LOT 1 GENERAL IRON WORKS SUB DESC AS BEG AT THE SW COR OF SD LOT TH A LG CURVE TO LEFT 201.64 FT TH NE 297.55 FT TH ALG CURVE RT 73.2 FT TH NE 512 .81 FT TH SE 265.47 FT TH S 53.29 FT TH ALG CURVE RT 47.52 FT TH SW 116.33 FT TH W 28.26 FT TH S 656.3 7 FT TO THE SE COR OF SD LOT TH W 734.44 FT TO BEG GENERAL IRON WORKS SUB LEGAL DESCRIPTION SOUTH PROPERTY: BEG 200 FT E & 20.6 FT N OF SW COR NW 1/4 SW 1/4 NW 1/4 SEC 34 TH N 519.4 FT TOE LINE OF AT & SF RR RT/WAY TH SWLY ALG SD LINE 563 FTTO S LINE NW 1/4 SW 1/4 NW 1/4 THE 121.5 FTTH N 20.6 FTTH E 40.5 FTTO BEG SEC 34-4-68 E 130 FT OF W 1/2 NW 1/4 SW 1/4 NW 1/4 EX AT & SF RR RT /WAY & EX ROADS SEC 34-4-68 2 • • LOTS 14-19 & VAC ST ADJ ON W & RES STRIP ON S OF LOT 19 BLK 1 TAYLORS ADD LOTS 46-49 BLK 1 TAYLORS ADD • • LOTS 44-45 BLK 1 TAYLORS ADD LOTS 42-43 BLK 1 TAYLORS ADD LOTS 1-6 BLK 1 TAYLOR'S ADD TOG WITH VACATED W CORNELL AVE ADJ ON THE NORTH & VACATED S HURON ST ADJ ON THE WEST EX THAT PART NOW KNOWN AS THE CORNELL STREET TRIANGLE LOTS 7-9 & VAC ST ADJ ON W BLK 1 TAYLORS ADD LOTS 10-13 & VAC ST ADJ ON W BLK 1 TAYLORS ADD ZONE DISTRICT NORTH PROPERTY: 1-1 Light Industrial 1-2 General Industrial ZONE DISTRICT SOUTH PROPERTY: 1-1 Light Industrial R-2-8 Medium-density single and multi-dwelling unit residential PROPERTY LOCATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USE: The subject property of this PUD is located adjacent to the RTD Light Rail line between Dartmouth and Bates . Land directly to the west is the RTD Light Rail tracks and the BSNF railroad tracks and further west beyond South Sante Fe in an industrial zone district and the Englewood/Littleton Waste Water Treatment Plant. Surrounding land to the east is a combination of 1-1 and R-2-8. This area is a mixture of industrial uses, single and multi- family housing as well as non-conforming residential units in the industrial districts. North is the RTD maintenance facility zoned 1-2. To the south is R-2-B zoning and Cushing Park. PUD PROCEDURE: Rezoning to a PUD requires the applicant to have a pre-application meeting with staff, a neighborhood meeting with owners and tenants located within 1,000 feet of the proposed PUD. After the neighborhood meeting a formal submittal is made to the City and reviewed by City departments and other affected outside agencies. A public hearing is held before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If the PUD is approved there is a 30 day referendum time period before permits can be granted. BACKGROUND: The Planned Unit Development is a rezoning process that establishes specific zoning and site planning criteria to meet the needs of a specific development proposal that may not be accommodated within existing zoning development regulations . A PUD rezoning provides the opportunity for unified development control for multiple properties or multiple u ses. 3 Th e co mbin ed properties are 16.72 acres and Winslow Construction Company has • occup i ed th e so uthern parcel since 19 54. G en e ral Iron Works occupied the northern p arce l for 111any years. RTD acquired a portion of the GIW parcel for its maintenance fac ilit y in 2002. Sand Creek acq uir ed it s ownersh ip in th e GIW parc el in 20 10. Parcels have be en zo ned Indu str ial sin ce th e fi1 ·s t zo nin g was put in pla ce in 1940. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARY: Pursu :.rnt to th e Unified Deve lopment Co d e PUD pro ced ur e, t h e appli ca nt co ndu c ted a n eighbo rho od meeting on Wednesday, July 18, 20 ·12, prior to subm ittin g the F>LJ[) app li ca tion. Notice of the pre-application meeting was mailed to owners and tenants of prop e rty loc:ited within 1000 feet of the proposed PUD property. A meeting summary is attached (See Exhibit A). CITY DEPARTMENT AND DIVISION REVIEW: The appli c ants had a pr e-application rneeting with staff in June 2012. Issues that wer e id entifi ed during the pre-application m ee ting were addressed by the appl icant and the final PUD packets were subrnitted o n Septemb er 2 7, 2012 . The final pl ans were reviewed b y City and o utsid e Agencies and the following comments w e re rnade: Tri-County Health Department: 1. TCHD e n courages the add iti on of PUD Deve lopm ent Standa rd s for bicycle facilities including bike parking for vis itors and resid e nts . • 2. The Sand Cre ek (North) PUD indicates detention ponds will be built on the development site. To reduce the potential for human exposures to West Nile and other mosquito-borne virus es, TCHD recommends that mosquito control plans be developed for any stormwate r facilities th at are designed to hold water for 72hours or long e r. Xcel Energy: 1. The Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) owns and operates existing natural gas and electric distribution facilities within the proposed project area. Th e developer must work with Xcel to install any new gas or electric service, or modification to exist ing facilities . BNSF: 1. No comment. Colorado Department of Transportation: 1. No comment. RTD MC#24 Comments were not provided from this Agency. 4 • • • • City of Englewood Department Reviews: Building: PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS The City of Englewood has adopted 2012 International Codes, in addition to ICC/ ANSI A 11 7.1 -2009 Accessibility standards which must be used for building on the site. Engineering: A Drainage Report per the Englewood Drainage Criteria Manual must be submitted. All concrete must be brought to City Standards. All Drainage must be directed to the Public Way (i.e. street or alley) All work in the Public Right-of-Way requires permits from Public Works. Any unused Drive Cuts must be closed per City Standards. Check list and Drainage review letters are attachments to the project. All Curb Gutter and Sidewalk will need to be brought up to City Standards, including a new 8' (minimum) wide sidewalk. Drainage report submitted but will not be approved. Site plans are conceptual in nature, therefore no approval for this design will be completed with this review. Fire: 1. 503.2.1 Dimensions. (Amended to read as follows) Fire Apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 26 feet (1725 mm), exclusive of shoulders, except for approved security gates in accordance with Section 503.6, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (4115 mm) . Traffic: Submitted documents include a conceptual site plan only; location and design of the access points are not part of this approval. Traffic Impact Study shall be updated when a specific site plan is submitted. (Community Development comment: Due to the Department recommendation of the approval of only the District Plans (zoning regulation entitlements) traffic impacts will be addressed with final site plan submission which the Commission will review at an additional public hearing). Utilities: Plans showing water-sewer-storm and fireline connections to the public mains need to be submitted for approval. Community Development: See comments below. PUD OVERVIEW: The Sand Creek and W H Investments PUD's will change the Permitted Principal Uses to allow residential uses in addition to the currently allowed industrial, office and retail uses. Other allowed uses in the PUD are outlined under the Table of Allowed Uses in the Written Statement on the PUD document. 5 Site Plan: The site plan has bee n subm itt e d for conceptual purpose s only. Dev elopment • st111 cL1rds l1av e b ee n outlin ed in the PUD Distri c t Plan and are as follows: Sand Creek PUD (North Parcel): The maximum dwellin g units per acre is proposed to be se t at 45. On this site the total m ax imun1 dw ellin gs would be 450. Th e proposed Sa nd Cree k PUIJ ha s se t th e rn ax imum h ei ght limitation for multi-family res i de ntial at 75'. The Unifi e d Developm ent Code (UDC) has a maximum h e ight limitati o n of 32' in all 1·es ide nti al zone d istricts. This is a difference of 43' or approximately 4 stories . Se tl x 1c ks for th e Sand C ree k PUD are propo se d to be 5' from all prop e I·t y lin es . Th e UDC's c uI ·rc nt sta ndard s fo r multi-family in th e MU-R-3-B are 15' front and side setbacks a n d 25' rea r setbac ks. The d eve lopment standards for industrial uses shall be consistent with the UDC with th e exce ption of setbacks. The proposed PUD will have a req uir ed minimum setback of 1 O' from all property lines . The UDC requires a 1 O' se tb ac k only wh e re a building abuts up o n, ad j o in s, or is adjacent to a residential zone di str ict. Industri al and other non-residential u ses would not b e subject to a height limitati on. WH Investment PUD (South Parcel): The ma x imum dwelling units p e r ac re are proposed to be set at 45. On this site the total ma x imum dwellings would be 2 70. In add ition to allowing industrial and multi-family, th e proposed WH Inv estme nt PUD • would also allow single family resid e nti al and atta c hed to vv nh o mes . The sin gle family and attac h ed townhomes would have th e sa m e dimensional sta ndards as the R-2-B zo ne district. Th e UDC does not currently hav e dimensional standards for attached townhomes. Residential units that are attached and more than one are considered multi-unit dwellings. Staff believes that the single family residential units should be regu lated under the dimensional standards of the R-1-C zone district and the attach e d townhomes should be reg ulated under the WH Investment PUD Development Standa rds of the Multi-Unit Residential Dwellings. The propos ed WH Inv estment PUD has the minimum setback listed as 2', with th e exception of a 5' to 1 O' setback along the east and west property lines. The 2' setback would be requir ed along th e north and south p roperty lines. The UDC has a minimum setbac k of 5' for any res id e ntial zone district, with th e exce ption of a small lot of record . The development standards for indu strial uses shall be consistent with the UDC with the exception of setbacks. The proposed PUD will have a requi1·ed minimum setback of 1 O' from all property lines. The UDC requires a 1 O' setback only where a building abuts upon, adjoins, or is adjacent to a residential zone district. As with the north parcel, industrial and other non-residential uses would have no height limitation. Architectural Standards (both PUD's): The architectural standards that are outlined in both PUD's are very similar and/or more stringent to architectural standards for multi-unit • residential us es listed in the UDC. 6 • Process (both PUD's): The process as outlined in the proposed PUD 's is proposing to have the Development Review Team as the final approving entity for the final site plan. Staff believes that the final site plan should be reviewed by Planning and Zoning through a public hearing and City Council through a public hearing. Minor modifications to the PUD's are consistent with the UDC, and are typically reviewed by the Development Review Team and approved through the permitting process. Major modifications to the PUD 's are also consistent with UDC with the addition of the following : • A change in the character of the development; or • A change in the permitted land uses; or • A change in the general location of land uses; or • An increase in the maximum height of any building of more than 5%; or • An increase in the number of dwelling units, or in the ratio of the gross floor area of structures to the land area, or increases in the proposed gross floor area within any particular land use of more than 2%; or • A reduction of more than 5% in the land area designation for landscaping; or • A reduction by more than 5% in the ratio of off-street parking and loading space to gross floor area or number of dwelling units . Landscaping (both PUD's): A complete landscaping plan will be provided at time of final • submittal of the site plan. • Parking (both PUD's): Parking guidelines will be prepared based on future development use and will be submitted with the final site plan. The developer may ask for a reduction in parking for multi-family housing due to the proximity of light rail. SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to re-zone two parcels to PUD to include residential uses in addition to 1-1 and 1-2 uses. Staff is requesting that approval of the final site plan be done through public hearings at Planning and Zoning and City Council meetings as a condition of approval of the PUD District Plans . PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS: The Commission must determine if the PUD is consistent with the Englewood 2003 Comprehensive Plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission can approve, approve with conditions or deny the proposed PUD. PUD Distri ct Plan The District Plan sets forth the zoning regulations under which the proposed amendments will occur. 7. The PUD District Plan is, or is not, in conformance with the District Plan requirements and the Comprehensive Plan. 7 T h e propo se d PUD is in confor111 a nce w ith th e Di str i ct Pl an and the Co111pr e h e n siv e • Pl ;rn. Sec tion 5 : Housing, Goal 1 st ates , "Pro111ot e a balanced 111ix of hou sing o pp o rtuniti es se rving th e ne e ds o f all curr ent and futur e Englewood Citi ze ns ". Obj ec ti ve 1-3 states, "En c oura ge h o u sin g inv es tm e nts th at i111prove th e hou sin g mix, inclu d in g bo th s111 all e r a nd lar ge r unit si zes, and a w id e r 1·a n ge of hou sin g t y p e s, includin g sin gl e-fa mil y, dupl ex, t ow n h o 111 e, a n d co n do minium units". 2. A ll req uir ed docu m ent s, dr Jwin gs, re( e rr als, reco mm endati o ns, and approvals hav e lx~e n rece ived A ll app ro p ri at e docum ents concerning Sand Creek and WH lnvest111ent PUD's have bee n r ece ive d; however the proposed PUD site plans have not been approved by all d e partments. 3. Th e PUD Distri ct Plan is consistent with adopte d and ge nerally acce pted standard s o( deve lo pment in th e City of Engl e wo od Th e Sand C ree k a nd WI-I lnv es trn e nts PU D Di strict Pl a n s r e 111 ain c onsi st e nt w ith acce pte d d eve l o p111 e nt st a nd a rd s es t a bli sh ed b y th e City o f En g l ew o o d . 4. Th e PUD Dist ri ct Plans are sub stanti ally co nsist ent w ith th e goa ls, objectiv es, des ign g uid e lin es, p oli cies and any o th er ord in an ce, law or req uir em ent o f th e City. Sa nd C r ee k a nd WH lnv e st111 e nt F>LJD 's a re in co nfo r111 a n ce with a ll oth e r • o rdin a nces, l aws a nd r equire rn e nts o f th e C ity. 5 . Wh en th e PUD Di stri ct Pl an is within th e En glew oo d Downto wn Deve lopm ent Authority (EDDA ) ar ea, th e Pl an is co nsist e nt with th e EDDA approve d d es ign s, poli cies and plans. Not applicable. PUD Site Pl an Th e PUD Site Pl a ns will b e reviewed a nd approv e d at a later date, yet to be deter111ined. ATTACHMENTS: Ex hibit A: Sa nd Cr ee k PUD Di stri ct Pl a n Ex hibit B: WH lnv es t111 e nt PUD Di stri c t Pl a n Ex hibit C: N e ighborhood M ee ting Su111111ary -Jul y 1 8, 2011 Ex hibit D : Clayton l ette r date d Nove111ber 12, 2012 8 • • • • ·P lanning and Zoning Commission Public Hearip.g Case #ZON20 12-007 Sand Creek PUD, #ZON2012 -00 8 W H In vestment PUD November 20, 2012 Page 1 of 6 CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING November 20, 2012 Minutes and audio are available at: http ://www.englewoodgov.org/lndex .aspx ?page=l 52 I. CALL TO ORDER ;J~}' The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Englewood Civic Center, Chair Brick presiding. Present: Absent: Staff: Bleile, Roth, Welker, Knoth, Fish , Brick, Kinton, Townley Freemire (alternate) King (excused) Alan White, Community Deve lopment Director Audra Kirk, Planner I Nancy Reid, Assistant City Attorney 11. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Nove mb e r 61 2012 Welker moved: Knoth seconded: TO APPROVE THE NOVEMBER 61 2012 MINUTES Chair Brick asked if there were any modifications or corrections. There were none. AYES: NAYS: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Bleile, Roth, Welker, Knoth, Fish , Brick, Kinton None Townley King Motion carried. Ill. PUBLIC HEARING :(~:j Case #ZON2012-007 Sand Creek Planned Unit Development and Case #ZON2012-008 W H Investment Planned Unit Development l'l;11111i11 g a11LI 1/,0 11i11 g Cornrnissio11 l 111i>li c I k;1ri11g C :;i sl' l/1/,0N2012-007 Sa nd Creek l'l JI), i/7,ON2 012-008 W 1-1 Investment PUD Nnvc111hcr 20 , 20 I 2 C k1ir I3ri ck stated there are two cases to be heard tonight; they will be heard concurr e ntly bu t eac h will 1·equ ir e a motion and they will be voted on separately. Fish mov ed: Roth seco nded: TO OPEN CASE #ZON2012-007 and CASE #ZON2012-008 AYE:S: NAYS : A l3S TA IN: Al3SENT: Bl eil e, lfoth, Welker, l<noth, Fish , Bri c k, l(int on, Townley None None l<in g Motion carried. ~ Ms. l<irk was swo rn in and presented the case. The applicant has submitted two app li cations, Sand Creek PUD (referred Lo as the north property) and W H Investments PUD (re ferr ed to as the south property) to rezone the above parcels from 1-1 Light In d u st rial and 1-2 General Industrial zoning to a PUD Planned Unit Development. The proposed PUD will allow multi-family res id e ntial as a permitted use, in add iti on to ex isting indu stria l permitted uses. Conceptua l site plans have been submitted because development • on the two sites lik ely wi ll not happen in the near term . As m arket conditions evo lve in the • future, si t e plans and details may change. Staff is recommending that w h en developm e nt is mo,·e certa in in the future, site plans be rev iew ed at public hearings before the Planning and Zoni n g Commission and City Council. Ms . l<i1-k discussed legal descriptions of both properties, cur rent zo ne districts, property location and surroundin g land use, PUD procedures, background infor171ation of the propeI·ty, n e ighborhood 171eeting su171maI-y, City department and division review, and an ove rv i ew of both proposed PUD's. t~ APPLICANT TESTIMONY The applicant provided a slid e show of the proposed PUD's. Mr. Vincent Harris, Planning Director for Baseline Corp., Mr. Fred Lantz, Traffic Engineer for Baseline Corp ., and Mr. Bryant Winslow, owner of the properties provided testimony. Issu es discussed were conta minati o n on the property, setbacks, height restrictions, exalTlples of what buildings 171ay look like, co-lTlingling of res idential us e along with industrial use, adding a provision that states the industrial uses go away when residential comes in, parking guidelines, density of developlTlent, is the Bates Station still an option, would applicant develop the property or sell to a developer, traffic flow and entrance placement to the development. • • • • • Planning and Zoning Commission Public He a.ri.ng Case #ZON2012-007 Sand Creek PUD, #ZON2012-008 W H Investment PUD Novemb er 20 , 2012 Page 3 of 6 ·~ PUBLIC TESTIMONY Testimony was heard from: • Vera Montez • Patrick Draper • Matthew Reeves • Lewis Fowler Fish moved: l<noth seconded : TO CLOSE CASE #ZON2012-007 and #ZON2012-008 AYES : NAYS: Bleile, Roth, Welker, Knoth, Fish, Brick, Kinton, Townley None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: King Motion carried. l<noth moved: Fish seconded: Discussion Points: THAT CASE #ZON2012-007, SAND CREEK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR ADOPTION WITH THE FOLLOW/NC CONDITIONS: • Final site plan approval will happen at a later date and will need to receive Planning and Zoning approval and City Council approval. • Access to the future Bates Street Light Rail station platform shall be moved from the south property to the north property. ► Great project for this area; in favor of this type of development. ► A PUD is appropriate for the area if the Bates Street Station Light Rail station is built; if not, density is too high. ► Very concerned about mixing residential with industrial uses . ► Need provision that industrial goes away when residential development occurs. ► Planning and Zoning Commission should see a Site Plan; this is just a general District Plan. ► Don't like request to remove the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council from Public Hearings to review Site Plan. l'l a1111i11g ;111 t.l 1/,oni11g Comn 1issiu11 l'11i>l1 c lll::1ri11g C;isc l/'.l,UN'.W l 2-007 Sci nd CrL'L'k I'll!>. //1/,(J N20 I 2-IHl X \N II l 11vcs1111c 11 t PUD Nu vl'.111h er 20. 2 012 ► H:ud t o m ake a de c i si o n w ith o ut more i nf crnna tion. ► Needs ope n space. ► V\/ou l d fl ex space be a ll owe d ? ► Too lllany umesolved i ss u es. Co mm e nts fr o lll Co mmi ss i o n: Mr. Fi sh sa i d w hile the gene ral nature o f this p ro j ect in many ways is co n si st e nt w ith th e Comprehe n sive Plan and I vvo ul d lik e l o see thi s a r ea go this dire c ti o n, there a re too m a ny unr eso lved issues with the ap pli ca nt's p rese ntation a nd in co nsisten cies such as n ot add r ess in g how the zoning fits togeth e r. This wo uld create a mix ed zon in g in the area. It i s way Loo spe c ulative. M r. We l ke r sa i d he vva nte d to l et eve ryo n e at th e hearin g know he i s not against deve lopment in thi s a rea. H e sa id he doesn 't beli eve thi s prop e rty c urr e ntly has the type of r e qu es t befme u s th at i s ve r ifi ab l e to the peop le who li ve th e r e a n d to the C ity. Ms . Townley said sh e definite ly wants to see deve l opment i n the a rea . Th e 1·e's ju st not e nou gh in fo rm at i on to approve. • M r. Blei le stated thi s particu la r property has some tremendous potential fo r eve rybo d y • in vo lved a nd would li ke to see it redeve l oped to it s high es t a n d best use. He felt the app li cant's intent i s to do the right thin g. H e stated h e und e r sta nd s Mr. Win sl ow's n eed to keep his bu sin ess go in g there at this tim e and i s fin e with h av in g both res id e ntial an d in dust ri a l uses, but there co uld have been add iti o n al detail provided to th e Co mmi ss ion. ~ AYES: NAYS: ABSTAIN : ABSENT: Motion failed. l@ l<noth, Brick Bleile, Roth , Welker, Fish , Kin ton, Townley No ne l<in g Welker moved: Bleile seco nd ed: TO INCORPORA TE THE DISCUSSION FROM CAS E #ZON20 12- 007 INTO Tf-1I5 CASE. CASE #ZON2012-008, W H INVESTME NT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL . TO CITY COUNCI L WITI-I A FAVORABLE REC OMMENDATION FOR ADOPTION WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • • • • ~P lanning and Zoning Commission Public Heari[lg Case #ZON20 12-007 Sand Creek PUD, #ZON2012-008 W H Investment PUD November 20, 2012 Page 5 of 6 • Final site plan approval will happen at a later date and will ne ed to receive Planning and Zoning approval and City Council approval, and • Del ete "and attached townhome use " from CJ a of the PUD District Plan Development Standards. Discussion Points for this case were included in the previous PUD. Mr. Bleile wanted the applicant to know the Commission is not against the development of this property. We want to see it happen . He asked that they not give up on it and go away. He said he would be very amicable to seeing some further discussion occur. If the Commission's concerns are addressed in a future presentation it's a no brainer. Mr. Fish said with some modifications this could work for all . Mr. Welker said he is very much in support of Roadmap Englewood . His problem with what was proposed tonight is that it isn 't concrete enough to give us assurance, to the city and to the people we represent of what is going to happen there ; that happens at the Site Plan review. Allowing residential on the property is not the problem. Ms. Reid said the Commission could take a short recess and let Staff and the applicant work on word ing the Commission is having difficulty with. Mr. Welker said , in his opinion, it's not a five to ten minute solution. He suggested the discussion continue to a date certain . Chair Brick asked the members if they wanted to take a recess to allow Staff time to add a condition or have him call for the question. Consensus was to not take the recess time; Chair Brick called for the question. Comments from Commission: AYES: NAY S: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Motion failed. Knoth, Brick Bleile, Roth, Welker, Fish , Kinton, Townley None King IV. PUBLIC FORUM rF.:"l'i ~- Mr. Fowler w ish ed to speak about th e Sand Creek property. The Commission invited him to attend a future Planning and Zoning meeting to discuss. l'l :1111 1i11 g a11d 1/,011i 11g C ommi ss ion 1111\ili c I lc;iri11 g < ':1s c 1/'L.ON 2 012-007 S:111 c.l Crt:c l; l'UD , i/Z ON 20"J 2-0 08 W H l nvestment PUD No vc 111h c r 20 , 2 0 12 l':1 gt: 6 of' Ci V. ATTORNEY'S CHOICE [aJ M s. Re i d had n othing fu rth e r to report. VI. STAFF'S CHOICE ~ D ir ectm \/Vh it e prov id ed an u pdJ te on futur e m ee tin gs . VII. COMMISSIONER'S CHOICE fill Mr. Roth stated h e h ated to vote down some thing that will ultim ate ly be a big plus for th e C ity; the proposal ju st was n 't we ll enough d eve lo ped. Mr. Bl e il e stated h e hated voting no too o n a proje ct that w ill ultim at ely happ e n . H e thanked the app li ca nt and eve ryo n e who att en ded. He as k e d the app li ca nt not to th ink ton i ght's decision was a rejection . Mr. Fr ee mi1·e stated it was ve ry difficult t o watc h what h e watch e d this eve nin g. In thi s case yo u have indu stri al t oday ri g ht n ex t t o sin gle fam il y res id enti al; that isn't go in g t o chan ge. • Th e question is, what gives yo u th e great er pr oba bility of improvement in the future for the • li ves of the c itizens and a lso h e lp s th e co mmercial or indu strial prop ert y owner t o acco mplish th e i r goa ls and also allo ws u s the oppo rtunity to mov e forwa rd and be ab l e t o m ove closer t o th e C ity 's lon g-term goa ls. Yo u ca n't say no and th e n say yes t o th e applicant. He suggested the Com rni ss i o n t ake a good seriou s look at thi s and create an envi ro nment wher eby we ca n be a co mmunity that would be r espo n sive and rec e pti ve to id eas th at maybe r eq uire sornething a littl e bit different than what was done before. If this was putting lip st ick on an o th erwise industrial property to enable it to se ll or to position it to se ll , th en wh at we've done is we've d elayed that process. The me eting adj o urn e d at 9:52 p .m. • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THE MA TIER OF CASE #ZON2012-007 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO REZONE THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS 601 W BATES AVENUE FROM 1-1 and 1-2 ZONE DISTRICTS TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) INITIATED BY: Baseline Corporation 700 12 th Street, Suite 220 Golden, Colorado 80401 ) ) ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND ) CONCLUSIONS OF THE ) CITY PLANNING AND ) ZONING COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) Commission Members Present: Commission Members Absent: Brick, Bleile, Knoth, Fish , Roth , Welker, Townley, Kinton King This matter was heard before the City Planning and Zoning Commission on November 20, 2012 in the City Council Chambers of the Englewood Civic Center. • Testimony was received from Staff, from the applicant and from area residents. The Commission received notice of Public Hearing, Certification of Posting, Staff Report and supplemental information from Staff, which were incorporated into and made a part of the record of the Public Hearing. • After considering stateme nts of the witnesses, and reviewing the pertinent documents, the members of the City Planning and Zoning Commission made the following Findings and Conclusions. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THAT the request to rezone the property known as 601 W Bates Avenue from l- and 1-2 to Planned Unit Development was filed by Baseline Corporation on September 27, 2012. 2. THAT the app li cant submitted two applications, Sand Creek PUD (referred to as the north property) and W H Inve stments PUD (referred to as the south property). 3. THAT Public Notice of the Public Hearing was given by publication in the Englewood Herald on November 2, 2012 and was on the City's website from October 26, 2012 through November 20, 2012 . 1 4. THAT Publi c Notice of the Public H earin g was mail e d to own e rs and occupants of p ro p e rt y w ithin 1,000 feet of the subj ec t p roperty. 5. THAT th e prop e rty was post ed as requir ed, said po stin g setting forth th e dat e, tim e, a nd pla ce o f th e Publi c H earin g. 6. THAT Planner !(irk t es tifi e d th e requ es t is fo r app rova l t o rezo n e th e prop ert y fr o m 1- 1 and 1-2 to Pl ann ed Unit D eve lo pm ent. tv\s. !(i rk t estifi e d t o th e cr ite ri a th e Co mmi ssion mu st co n side 1· wh e n rev iew in g a rezo nin g a ppli ca tion. tv\s. !<irk furth e r tes tifi ed th at St aff reco mm end s approv al of th e Sa nd C r ee k PUD District Plan with t he fo ll ow in g co ndition s: • Final site plan approval will happen at a later date and will ne ed t o rec eive Planning and Z oning approval and City Council approval. • A c ce ss to th e futur e Bat es Str eet Li ght Rail station pl atform shall b e m ove d from th e south prop e rty to th e north prop e i-ty. 7. THAT th e prop e rt y is lo ca t e d adja ce nt to th e RT D Li ght Rail lin e b et wee n D artm o uth a nd Bate s. 8. THAT th e area is a rni x tur e of industri al u ses, sin gl e a nd multi-famil y ho u sin g as we ll as non-co nformin g res id e nti al units in th e indu stri al di stri c t s. 9. THAT th e prop e rt y is 10 .61 acr es and w as ac quired b y Sa nd Cree k in 2 01 0. 10. THAT th e p a rce l ha s b ee n z on ed indu stri al sin ce th e fir st z onin g was put in place in En glew o od in 1 9 40 . 11. THAT the applicant is proposing rezonin g to a PUD to include r esidential uses. 12. THAT the proposed PUD zoning would m ak e the property more desirable for d ev elopment. 13. THAT prelimin ary plans of the propos ed Sand Creek PUD was referred to Tri- County Health, the Colorado D epartm ent of Transportation (COOT), RTD, Xce l Energ y and BNSF Railroad for revi ew and comment. 14. THAT the Sand Cr e ek PUD was revi ewed by the City's Developm ent Revi ew T ea m (ORT) on Novemb e r 13 , 2012 . 15. THAT the m aximum dwelling units per acre are propos e d to be set at 45; the total m ax imum d w ellings would be 450. 16. 17. THAT setback requirements shall be set at 5' from all property lines for multi-family. THAT the maximum height limitation for multi-family residential be set at 75'. 2 • • • • • • 18. THAT the development standards for industrial uses shall be consistent with the UDC with the exception of setbacks; the proposed PUD will have a required minimum setback of 1 O' from all property lines. 19. THAT Industrial and other non-residential uses would not be subject to a height limitation. 20. THAT pursuant to the PUD procedure, the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on July 18, 2012 . 21. THAT notice of the neighborhood meeting was mailed to property owners and occupants of property within 1 000 feet of the site. 22. THAT testimony was received from residents regarding the proposed redevelopment of the site . Concerns were voiced about safety on Elati Street, traffic, impact on community, and the proposed Bates Street Light Rail Station. 23. THAT the application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. 24. THAT the application meets the Housing Goals and Objectives of Roadmap Englewood: 2003 Englewood Comprehensive Plan . 25. THAT the application is not consistent with adopted and generally accepted standards of development in the City. 26. THAT the application is not consistent with the goals, objectives, design guidelines, policies and other ordinances, laws, or requirements of the City. 27. THAT the resulting rezoned property will have a significant negative impact on those properties surrounding the rezoned area and that the general public health, safety and welfare of the community are protected. CONCLUSIONS 1. THAT the application was filed by Baseline Corporation seeking approval to rezone the property from 1-1 and 1-2 to Planned Unit Development. 2. THAT proper notification of the date, time, and place of the Public Hearing was given b y publi cation in the official City newspaper, and by posting of the property for the required length of time. 3. THAT all testimon y rec eived from staff members, applicant team members, and the general public has been made part of the record of the Public Hearing . 3 4. THAT th e application is in co nformance with the Comprehensive Plan. 5 . THAT the c1p pli ca ti o n is n ot co n sistent with ad o pt ed and generally acce pted standard s o f deve lop m e nt in th e City. 6. THAT th e app li ca ti on is not co n siste nt w ith th e gor1 ls, obj ec tiv es, design gui de lin es, policies and other ordinanc es, laws, or req uir em e nts o f th e C ity. 7. THAT res ide ntial use ca nn o t be deve lop ed und e r th e existing zoning; the propos ed PUD zo nin g would m ake the property m o re desirable for developm e nt. 8. THAT th e Dev elopment Review T ea m r ev iewe d the site plan and determin ed that a substa ntial amount of th e propo sa l m eets es tablished City developm e nt sta ndards, h oweve r there are unresolved iss u es. 9. THAT th e PUD zoning d es i gnation is app ropri ate for the area if the Bates St reet Li ght Rail St ati o n is built; if not, d e n sity is too hi gh. 10. THAT the Co mmi ss ion is very co n ce rn e d about mi xin g re sidenti al u se w ith indu strial us e. 11. THAT the Commission does not agree with th e applicant's re qu es t to remove the Pl anning and Zoning Commi ss ion and City Council from Public Hearin gs t o rev iew Site Plan. 12. THAT there are too many unresolved issues with the current application. DECISION THEREFORE, it is th e d ecis ion of the City Planning and Zoning Commission that the application fil ed by Baseline Corporation to rezone the property known as 601 W Bates Ave nue from 1-1 and 1-2 to Planned Unit Development not be recommended to City Council for a pprov al. The de c ision was reac hed upon a vote on a motion mad e at the me eting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission on Novemb er 20, 2012, by Mr. l<noth, seconded by Mr. Fish, which motion states: THAT CASE #ZON2012-007, SANO CREEK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR ADOPTION WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 4 • • • • • • AYES: NAYS: ABSTAIN : ABSENT: • Final site plan approval will happen at a later date and will need to receive Planning and Zoning approval and City Council approval. • Access to the future Bates Street Light Rail station platform shall be moved from the south property to the north property. Brick, Knoth Fish, Roth, Welker, Townley, Bleile, King, Kinton None King The motion failed. These Findings and Conclusions are effective as of the meeting on November 20, 2012. BY ORDER OF THE CITY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION [LI John 5