HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013 Ordinance No. 005•
•
•
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE N0.0
SERIES OF 2012/2013
COUNCIL BILL NO . 69
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER WOODWARD
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SAND CREEK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
(PUD) LOCATED AT 601 WEST BATES AVENUE IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD,
COLORADO .
WHEREAS, the Sand Creek parcel is a 10.61 acre site formerly occupied by General Iron
Works (GIW) for many years , and is zoned Industrial (I-1 and I-2) since the 1st zoning was put in
place in 1940; and
WHEREAS , RTD acquired a portion of the GIW parcel for its maintenance facility in 2002 ; and
WHEREAS, Sand Creek acquired its ownership in the GIW parcel in 201 O; and
WHEREAS, Sand Creek submitted application for the proposed Planned Unit Development to
establish specific zoning and site planning criteria for a Planned Unit Development (PUD); and
WHEREAS, the Sand Creek PUD will change the Permitted Principal Uses to allow residential
uses in addition to industrial, commercial, retail and offices uses; and
WHEREAS , the Planning and Zoning Commission held a Public Hearing on November 20,
2012; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended a denial of the application to
rezone the property known as 601 W. Bates Avenue from I-1 and I-2 to a Planned Unit
Development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Sand Creek Planned Unit Development (PUD) located at 601 West Bates
A venue et al. in the City of Englewood, Colorado, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby
approved.
Section 2 . The applicant, Sand Creek Investors , L.L.C. wishes to amend its application for the
Sand Creek Planned Unit Development (PUD) to limit the uses allowed in this PUD to the
following:
Uses Allowed by the PUD District Plan
1
11 b ii
Residential Uses
Group living facility, large/special
Group living facility, small
Live/work dwelling
Low, Medium and High Density Multi-unit dwellings
Multi-Family Related Ancillary Uses s uch as Leasing Office, Private Recreation
Facilities, etc.
Public/Institutional Uses
Athletic field
Community garden
Library
Museum
Park and Open Space
Religious institutions and associated accessory uses
Schools
T e lecommunication Facility (See Chapt er 16-7, "Teleco mmunications, "for applicahle
us e-related guidelines and standard.~), to include alternative tower structure, Antenna
(microwave antenna, sectorized panel antenna, whip antenna) and Tower structure
Transit Center
Conm1ercial Uses
Greenhouse/nursery, raising of plants , flowers, or nursery stock
Assembly hall or auditorium, hall rental for meetings or social occasions
Membership organization
Indoor Entertainment/ Amusement
Amusement establishment as a Conditional Use
Physical fitness center/s pa
Theater and performance/concert venue, not including adult entertainment
General outdoor recreation, as a Conditional Use
Check cashing facility
Financial institution, with drive-through service
Financial institution, without drive-through service
Food and Beverage Service, Including:
Brewpub
Caterer
Microbrewery
Restaurant, bar, tavern with or without outdoor operations
Restaurant, with drive-through service
Take out and delivery only
Medical and Scientific:
Clinic
Hospital
Laboratory ( dental, medical or optical)
Office, type 1 (general)
Office, type 2 (limited)
Dry cleaner, drop-off site only
2
'1
•
•
•
•
•
•
Instructional service
Personal Care Service, Including photography studio and photo lab, upholstery, printer,
locksmith, tailor
Repair shop (not including auto)
Retail Sales and Service (Sales), Including:
Antique store
Art gallery
Buy-back, second-hand, thrift, consignment stores, Large
Buy-back, second-hand, thrift, consignment stores, Small
Convenience store
Grocery/specialty food store
Internet sales location
Liquor store
Retail sales, general merchandise
Trade or business school
Radio /television broadcasting studio, recording/film studio
Automotive service station (gasoline facility)
Car wash, auto detailing
Parking facility, structure ( operable vehicles), principal use
Parking area, surface (operable vehicles), principal use
Hotel
Hotel, Extended Stay
Industrial Uses
Wholesale Sales and distribution
Industrial Service, light
Industrial Service, heavy
Manufacturing (Including processing, fabrication or assembly), light
Manufacturing (Including processing, fabrication or assembly), heavy
Moving and storage
Outdoor storage
Storage yard for vehicles, equipment, material, and/or supplies, including Contractor
office and yard
Warehousing and/or storage, including mini-storage
Commercial storage, sales and repair of operable vehicles and equipment
All Commercial and Industrial Uses shall have a maximum height of one-hundred feet
(100')
And the City and Council hereby accepts this amendment to the PUD District Plan. The
allowed uses are hereby included on the PUD District Plan.
Section 3 . The applicant, Sand Creek Investors, L.L.C. Planned Unit Development (PUD)
wishes to amend its application to provide that all allowed industrial uses shall cease and shall not
be grandfathered nor considered legal, non-conforming uses upon the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy for any residential or commercial use within the PUD, whether or not the property
within the boundaries of the PUD has been platted. And the City and Council hereby accepts this
amendment to the PUD District Plan. This restriction is hereby included on the PUD District Plan.
3
Section 4 . Development on any portion of the PUD for any residential use (and not
public/in st itutional, conunercial, or industrial uses) shall be subject to site plan review by the
Pl a nnin g and Zoning Conunission and review and approval by C ity Council. If any sit e plan is
submitted for public/institutiona l, co mmercial, or industrial uses , it will be processed
administratively as a llowed by th e Unified Deve lop ment Co de . This requirement is hereb y
included in the PUD Di strict J>lan.
lntrocluc ecl a nd co n s id ered on the 17°1 day of December, 2012 and continued until the 22"c1 day
of.January, 201 3.
Reintroduced, read in full , and pa ssed on first reading on the 22nd day of January, 2013.
Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City's official new spaper on the 25 1
1, day of
January , 2013.
Publi s hed as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City's officia l website beginning on the 23 rd cl ay of
J anuary , 2013 for thirty (30) d ays.
A Public Hearing was he ld on the 4°1 day of February, 2013 .
Introduced and considered on the 17°1 day of December, 2012 and continued until the 22nd day
ofJanuary, 2013.
Reintroduc ed, read in full, and pa ssed on first rea ding on the 22nd da y of January, 2013.
Published by Title as a Bill for a n O rdinance in the C ity's official newspaper on the 25 th day of
January, 2013.
Publi shed as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City's official website beginning on the 23rc1 day of
January, 2013 for thirty (30) days .
A Public Hearing was held on the 4th day of February , 2013.
Read on second reading and amended on February 19°1
, 2013
Published as amended by title in the City's official newspaper on the 22nd day of February,
2013.
Published as amended on second reading on the City's official website begi1ming on the 20tJ' day
of February, 2013 for thirty (30) days.
Read by title and passed as amended on final reading on the 4°' day of March, 2013 .
Published by title as amended in the City's official newspaper as Ordinance No. S, Series of
2013, on the 8th day of March, 2013.
4
•
•
•
•
•
•
Published by title as amended on the City 's official website beginning on the 6th day of
March, 2013 for thirty (30) days.
I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true copy of the amended Ordinance passed on final reading and
published by title as Ordinance No.,£, Series of 2013 .
5
•
•
8
•
PUD LEGAL DESCR IPTION
A PARCH OF LANO DESCRIBED IN THE BOUNDARY LINE AOJ.JSTM£N T DOCUMENT RECORO£D AT RECEPTION NUMBER 82119969 IN 11-i(
ARAPAHO£ COO/HY QERK 00 RECffiOER'S ~ACE, ALSO BEJNG 0CSCR1B{J) AS FClJ.OWS :
A PORTION OF LOT 1, GENERAL JROH YK>RKS SU!r)IV!SfON, RECORDED IN BOQ< 87, PAGE 2:>, Al RECEPTION NUMBER 82609250 IN THE
ARAPAHO£ COJNTY CLERK AND RfCORD(R'S CfflCf, l 'r1HC IN THf N~Tlf't'£ST OOARTER Of" SfCTION 34, TOYiNSHIP 4 SOU TI-1, RANGE 68
VEST Cf lHE SIXTH PRINCIPA L MERIOI.A.H, OTY Of' ENGL(YIOOO, ARAPAHOE COU NTY, COlOOADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FClLOW'5:
BE.GINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CffiN[R OF SAIO LOT 1, C(NERAl I~ ~s 51.JBDvlSION (H:UNO #4 R[BAR sn IN CONCRETE);
WHENCE THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAil LOI 1, G(N[RAL IROI< WORK S suoo~-(roUNO f4 R[BAR SET IN CONCRETE) BEARS N
89'23' J8" E A DISTANCE ~ 7l'-44 FEET (BA~S Of BEAAlMG -ASSUMED):
TI-IENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO TI-IE LEFT, BE ING ~ TI-IE EASTERL't RIOH OF WAY LINE or THE ATCH ISON, TOPEKA & S.A.HTA FE
RAILROAD, ALSO &ING FIFTY (50) FEE T EA'STER LY OF ANO PARALLEL YitTH TH[ CEN TERLINE OF SAID ATQ-OS()I, TOPEKA &: SANTA FE
RAILROAD MAIN TRACKS, HA\IINC A CENTRAL ANGlE OF 1"'59'56•. A RADI US OF 5779.75 FUT, A CHORD BEARING OF N 12"39'CXt E, A
DISTANC( Of 201.63 FEET. AND AN ARC OIS TANC£ OF 201.6,t FEET;
THENC£ N 20 ·39',lQ" [ NOH-TANGENT WITH THE LAST D£SCRl9ED aJRvE AH O TANCEN T 'MTH THE FOLLOWING DESCRJBEO OJRV[ A OISTAHC(
Of 297.55 fEEI:
TI--t[NC( Al.ONG THE ARC Of A OJRVE TO THE RIG-IT, HAVING A C(N TRAL ANGLE Of 34'57'08'", A RADIUS Cf 120.00 FEET. A CH ORD
BEARING N .}81)8'14 · E A OISTANcr Of 72.07 FEET, ANO AN ARC OISfANC[ Of 73.20 FEET;
THENC£ N 55'36',t8" E TANG:NT WllH THE LAST DESCRIBED CURI/£ A DISTANCE OF 512.81 FEET;
THENC£ S 88'57"28" E A DISTANCE CF 265 .◄7 FEET;
IH(NC[ 11<[ f<X.LO..,NG FlVE (5) CruRSES ALONG TH[ EASTERLY UN[ ~ SAJO LOT 1, GEN£RAL IRON \\OOKS SU80IW...Ol>t
1) S 0014'08• E TA NGENT WITH "THE fOL LOYllNG OESCRl8£D CURVE A OISTANC( C$ 53.29 f([T;
2) THENCI ALONG THE ARC Of A CU RV( TO THE RIGHT. HAVING A CfNTRAL .4.NG..E Of 59'J2'3(t, A RADIU S Of 45.73 FEET. A CH ORD
BE ARING S 29"J2'or WA llSTANC[ Of 45.41 FEET, ANO AN ARC DISTANCE Of 47.52 fE[I;
3) THENCE S 59 18'21R W JANCl:N T 'M TH THE LAST ~SCR IBED CU R"{ A OISTANCE Of 11 6.33 FEET ;
4) TH (NC( S 89'22'25" W A DISTANCE Cf 28.26 f£ET;
5) THENC:£ S 00·13'34 • E A DISTANCE Of 656.37 FEET TO THE SOJTHEAST COR NER OF SAIO LOT I , GENERAL IRON ~S SUBDIIJI S!ON
(fOON D f4 REBAR SET IN CONCREIE):
TH[NC[ S 89'23'38. W ALONG SA ID SOUTHERLY LOT LINE (J'" LOT I, G[H[RAL IRON ~s SUBOIVISIOH A OISTAHCE or 734.44 rt[T TO
TI-IE ~T Of BEGINNING.
SAID OCSCRIBEO PARCfl CF LANO COITAlNS 459,◄27 SO. FT. OR 10 .55 ACRE , MORE ffi LESS.
TOGETHER \lt!TH;
A PARC(L f$ LANO LOCATED IN THE NW 1/,t Cf' TH( NW 1/,t Of SE CTICJi .}4, lO'M-ISHIP ~ SOOTH, RANG[ 68 'M:ST Of TH[ 6TH P.M., MME
PARTICULAR!. Y 0£SCRIBEO AS fOUOWS:
CON9DER1NG THE l![SI LINE Of THE NW I /< Of SAO SEC TI ON 34 AS B£ARING Of S00'16'24"E ANO 'M TH ALL BEARlNGS CONIAIN[O H[R[JN
RELATIVE HREIO:
COMMEHONG "1 THE NORTH\'iCST CCRNER Of SAI D S[CTIOH J4, TH[NC[ S00"16'2,("[ AL(J,,c; THE KST Lt-I[ Of SAIO NW 1/• or sccnON J,( A
~STANO: Of 1319,09 rm 10 THE SCIJIHWESl CORNER Of TH[ NW 1/4 Of SAil NW 1/<:
THENC£ NS9'2J'52"E A DISTANCE Of 116.19 f[[T TO A PON T ~ TH[ [ASTERtY UN[ Of TH[ 9.JRUNGTON RAILROAD R!GH T-(1'-WAY (FORMERLY
THE A10il$00 -TOP[KA AM1 SANTA fE RALROAO ) AAO T>£ PONT U 8CCIHNINC;
TH[NC[ ALONG SAID [AS l ERtY R1GHI -Of -WAY U<E ALON G A NON -1ANCEN1 CURii: 10 TH[ L£f1 'M TH ,n ARC LENGTH Of 30.81, A RAlliUS Of
5779.65 rrn, A 0:NTRAL ANGI.I « O'l8'20·. AHO A CH ORD THAT BlARS H1419'5J"( A OtS TANcr <J' J0.82 fff T TO THE SCXJTHWEST CORNER Of
LOT 1, G[N[RAL IRON ~S SU BOlvlSION AS R[COROEO IN BOOC 87, PAGC 25, R(C£PTION NO. 2609250 ~ THE COONTY a.ERK AK) RECOR DER 'S
RECORDS:
THENCE H89'ZJ'J8"E, ALONG 1H[ SOO!l!ERLY LIN[ OF SAO LOT 1, A ~STANCE Of 8J.26 rm TO THE INTERSECTTON WITH THE \IESIERiY LINE Of
S<X.ITH CALAPAGO STREET (XT[HD£0;
THENCE SOOW'19"[, ALONG SAO \!ESTER!. Y UN[ Of SOUTH GAI.APAGO SIRE[T [X TEMO[O A (ISi AMC[ Of zg.79 rm 10 THE SOUTH L~[ Of SAi)
NW 1/< Of IHE NW I /< Of S[C II DN J4;
THENCC S89"2J '52'"W, ALONG SAID SOU1H Ult( A OISTANCt: Of 90.95 FEtT TO TH[ PClNT Of BEGINNING;
SAlD TRACT Of LANO CON 1AIHS ± 1~92 SJ . CR 0.06 AalES
SAND CREEK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NW ¼ OF SECTION 34,
T4S, R68W OF THE 6TH P.M.,
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO
SHEBT_I_OF ....L
~ )Ii ~ I;;
~ I r ,-I e
r-----.... "' -W, YI £ A
'--, j
I---
/ I~ ,ii I;; w ... .,,.
t ~
I "' --, -
I/ \ -W DAR lur, "'Al£.
N ~t 1 I
"' e
-I "'
i~ I l ""
I I 7 1----< y 1w.C, LJ I L,..,-
~ J f.£.j\J,S. I lw'I. 285 ~,
SCALE: ,· • 1,000' VICINITY MAP
BACKGROU ND
lHE SUBJECI PROP[RJY IS COMPOSED CY TWO PAACE LS, LOCA1£0 ON TH£ ~fHYIEST COONER G" VllS I BAIIS
AVENUE, .4.ND scxm-r ELATI STREE T, ANO EAS T Of THE BURUNGTON NORTHERN SANTA ff RA llROAO.
TOTAL AREA FOR THE PARCO. IS 462.231 Sf, OR APPROXI MATilY' 10.61 ACRES. TI-IE SIT£, Yn·tla-! IS CURRENQY
OY,NED 8 '! SAND CREE K INV[SlffiS, L.l.C., IS UNO£RGOING A 0.EA NUP OPERAnOO fROM A PRIOR IRON VI001<S
SER\1CE LOCA lED ON THE PROPERI Y. THE SIT E IS CURRENTLY ZONED AS A GENERAL INDUS1RIAL DISTRIC T (1-2).
THE PUD f~ THIS PROPER TY 'M ll INTROOUC( ZONING AND DEVELOPMEN T STAOOARDS THAT Will ALLOW FOR ANO
PERMI T (1-2) USES FOR POSS!Bl[ FUTUR[ DE vfLOPMENTS AN D IN AD DITION, 'Nill AOO MULT!-FAIJ ILY USES AND
OEVEU)P MENT STANDARDS THAT ARE APP RCPRIATE ANO CONF~MING TO THE SURROONDING USES IN THE AREA. T}IE
PL ANNED UNI T OEVC LOPMENT APPLICA TION Will BE PROC ESSE D PURSUAN T TO TH E APPUCABL[ QTY REGULATICt4S.
GENERAL NOTES
1. AN ALTA SURVEY WAS PRE PARE D BY BASELINE ENGIN EERING CORPORATION ANO IS PART()=' THIS SUBIJ ITTAL
2. A PR[UMlNARY DRAINA GE REPORT WAS PREPAR ED BY BAS£UNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION AN D IS PART ()=' THIS
SUBMITTAL.
3. A TRAFFI C REPCfH WAS PREPARED BY BASELINE [~NEERING CORPORA TIO>! AHO IS PAR T OF TH IS SUB!JITTAL
4. TH!S PROPERTY DOES NOT LIE W!TH!N A 100-YEAR Fl.000 PLAIN .
5. SUBOl...,SION or TH[ SIT E SHALL a: COMPl[T[O UNO(R SEPARA TE DOCU M(N I.
6. THE OEVELOP£R SHALL COMPLY 'NITH Al l APPLICABLE QTY COOES, REGU LAflONS. ANO STANDA RD S.
7. lN TH[ EVENT ()=' A CONFl !CT BETViCEN THE SPEanc PRO\r1SIONS CF THIS PUO ANO TITLE 16, THE SP[ClflC
PROVISIONS OF TH IS Pt.JO SHALL CON TRQ.
SITE DA TA
T0 1AL ~1[ AREA (2 PARCELS) 462,231 S.F. OR 10.61 ACR[S
A\1
L
en & 00\JN ty Of O[Nlul\ \
/,t,AP~ CE C lUN'I
-----"
I
~
>-;i
~
Iii
"'
/
COMMERCIAL USES:
GRE[ ... OUS[/NURSERY, RAISING OF PLANTS, flO\\l'RS, OR NURSERY SIOO<
ASSEMBt.Y HALL CR AUllTORAJM, HALL ROHAL FOO ILETINGS 00 SOOAL OCCASl~S
M£MBER9-IIP OOGANIZA TIOO
IN~ ENTERTAINMENT/ AMUS[MENT
AMUSEMEN T ES TABLI SHMEN T AS A CON DITIONAL USE
PHYSICAL FlTNESS CEN TER/S PA
THEA TER ANO PERfO Rli4AN CE/CONC£RT VE NUE, NOT INCLUDING ADULT ENTERTAINMENT
GENERAL OOTOOOR RECREATI~. AS A CONDI TIONAL US£
CH[O< CASHING FAOLIIY
FINANOAL INSTITUTION. WITH DRIVE -THROOGH SER...,C[
flNANOAL INS n TU TION , WI rHOO r ()RIV[-rHR OUQ-1 SERVIC(
rooo AND 8£\IERAGE SER\1CE, INCLUDING·
BRE'NP UB
CA TERER
~1CR06RE'W[RY
RES TAURAN T, BAR, TAV[RN WITH OR WITHOUT OUTDOOR OPERATIONS
RES TAURAN i , 'MTH DRIVE -THROUGH SERVICE
TAKE OUT NO OEUVER'! ONLY
M[[ICAL ANO SCIEHTin G,
CLI NIC
HOSPITAi..
LABORATOR Y (DEN TAL, MEDICAL OR OPTICAL)
OfRCE, Tl!'[ 1 (GlNERAL)
~. TYPE 2 (LIMITED)
ORY UEANER, OR{J'-Off SITE ONLY
INSTRUCTIONAL SER~CE
PERSON AL CARE SERvlCE,
lll!!,!l.B.
SAND CREEK INVESTORS, Ll.C.
3002 S. HURON ST.
ENGLEWOOD, CO 8011 0
PLANN ER
BASELI NE ENGINEERING CORP.
700 121H SI., SU ITE 220
GOlDEN, CO 8040 1
~NC[ HARRIS, AJCP
(303) 202 -5010 x117
BASELINE ENGINEERING CO~P.
700 12n-t ST., SUITE 220
GOLDEN, CO 80401
N0Af1 HEMMERS, PE
(303) 940 -9966 ,207
PUD DISTRICT PLAN DEVE LOPM ENT STANDARDS INCLUDING PHOTOGRAPHY STUDIO AND PHOTO LAB, UPHO LSTERY, PRINTER, LOCKSM ITH, TAILOR
R[PAIR SHOP
A.~~ UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVI DED FOR IN THE PUD ~ AN AMEN DMENT THERETO, THE
PROVISIONS, STANDARDS. R(GUlA TI ONS AND PROC£0URES P£RTINENT TO AN APPLI CATION FOR THE O(VCLOPM(HT
Of LAND 'MTHIN THIS PUO ZONE DISTRICT SHALL COlr.lPLY 'MTH THE (1-2) ZONE DI STRICT ANO THE BELOW LIS TED
STAN DARDS FCR MULTI-FAMILY USE THE STANDARDS FOR (1-2) GENERA L IN DUSl~IAl DISTRIC T CAN BE
Rff(R[NCED IN TITLE 16 r$" THE QTY Of ENQ.EWOOO MUNIOPAL COOL
R. eE.R.M!.IIED ... JJ.S£.S.: TH E fClLO'MNG USfS ARE P£RMITTEO F~ THE SANO CRfEK PUO SIT£. UN LESS OTHERl't!SE
PROVtOEO , THE FOLLOl'tiNG USE CAIIGORIES AND rwcs SHA LL HAI/£ THE SAME MEAN INGS AS SU CH CAIEGORY
ANO USE T£RMS BY TH[ SAME NAMES CONTAIN£D IN TITLE 16 Cf THE ENQ.EWOOO MUNIQPAl CODE. PERMITTED
USES ARE SUBJECT TO AL L APPLICABLE R[G ULATIONS OF TITLE 16 -ENGLEWOOD UNIFIED OEVE LQPij[Nf COOL
RESIDENTIAL USE S:
GROUP LIVING FAOUTY, LARGE/SP[OAI.
GROOP U\1NC F AOLITY. SMALL
LIVE/WORK DWELLING
LOW, MEOIUM AN O HGH 01.NSUY MULII -UNJI D\\l'LLINGS
W.TI-FAMILY RUAT£D /\HOU.ARY USES SIJQ-1 AS l£ASIHG OfflCE, PRfVATE RECREA7ION FAOUTIES, ETC.
PU BllC /INS II lU IIONAL USE S:
A IHlETIC f lELO
COMMUNITY GAROCN
LIBRARY
MUSEUM
PARK ANO OPEN SPACE
RELIQ()JS INSTITUTIONS ANO ASSOOATEO ACCESSORY USES
SCHOOLS
TELCr;c;,/~UtlCATION FACIU IY (SC( CllAPIER 16-7, 7fffCOl,/UI/IIICA llOIIS,' FOR APP/.ICAl/1.£ 1/SC-RfLAlfO
CIJIOEUNES ANO S TANOAROS). 10 INQUO[ ALTERNA TIVE TOWER STRUCTURE, ANTE NNA (MICROWAVE
ANTENNA, SE CTORl2£D P.ANEL ANl[NNA , WH IP ANTENNA) AN O TO'tt£R STR UCTURE
'ffi.ANSIT C(NlfR
RETAI L SALES ANO SCRVICE (SALES), INQUOING:
ANTIOU[ STORE
AR1 GA LLERY
BUY-BACK, SECOND-HANO. THRIF1, CONSIGNMEN T STORES, LARG E
BUY-BACK, SECOND-HANO, THRIFT, CONSIGNMEN T STOR£S, SMAL L
CONVEN l[NC[ STORES
GROCERY /SPECIALITY FOOD STORE
INTERNET SALES LOCA TION
LI QUOR STORE
RETl<ll SALES, GENERAL MERCHANDISE
ffiAOC OR BUSINESS SCHOO.
RADIO/T£LE\1SION BROADCASTING STI.IDIO, RECOOOING/FlUA STUDIO
AUTOMOTIIJ[ S[R\r1C£ s rATION (GASCX.IN[ fAOUTY)
CAR WASH , AUTO O[IAIUNC
PARKINC rACJUIY, STRUCTURE (OP[R ATll( VEida.ES), PR1NOPAL USE
PARKING AREA, SURfACE (OP[RA!ll.E VEHIQES), PRINOPAL USE
HOTEL
HOIEL, CXT[NOCO STAY
INOUS !RIAL USES
'M-iOl..£SAL[ SAL.£$ ANO DISTRIBUTION
INDUSTRIAL S£R "C£, LIG!H
MANUFACI\JRINC (INQl.lllNG PROCES'51NG, FABRICATION OR ASSEMBLY), UCHI
MANUfACI\JRING (INQl.lllNG PROC£SSING, FABRICAIIOO OR ASSEMBLY), HEAVY
ijQ"NG ANO STORAGE
00~ STORAGE
ST~AG[ YARDS fOR V[HIQ[S, (Oi.J lPM[N T, MA TERIAL, ANO/OR SUPPLI ES, INQUOING
CONTRA CT~ OFFICE ANO '!ARO
WAREHOJgNG ANO/OR STORAG(, 1NCLU01NG MINI-STORAG(
COMMERCIAL STORAGE. SALES ANO REPAIR Of OPERABLE VEHICLES ANO EQUIPMENT
(USES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE)
SHEET INDEX
Pl -CO\Ol / DISlRICT PLAN
P2 -DISlRICT PLAN / ARCHrn:Cl\JRAI. IMAGES & DETAILS
Pl -EXISTING sm: PLAN
Pl -COOCEl'TIJAI. ..UL TI-F AMl Y Sil£ PLAN
PROPERTY O~ER·
SANO CREEK INV'fSTOOS, l.l.C., A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
BY:
rt.OYD 'MNSlOw, :.R. MANActR
Sf ArE Cf" COLORADO
COONTY Of
THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOVUOCEO BEFCffl: ME rHlS
___ DAY Of ______ • 20_ OY
flOYD 'MNSl OW .,R MANAG[R F~
SAND CR[[K INl/£STOOS l.L.C.
WITNE SS UY HANO ANO CfflaAL SEAL
NOTARY PUBLIC
UY COMUISSION EXPIRES:
APPROVED fOR lH[ CITY OF ENGlEWOOO
PLANN1NG AND ZONING COMl,USsiON Oi A1RP£RSON DA rt
PlANNtNG AND ZOHtNG COMMISSiON R(COROING s(CR(fARY DAT[
MAYOR ct ENGlt'M)()() DA rt
ATTESTED
THE fOR[GOING APPROVALS 'hf.RE AO<NO'M..EDGEO BffORE ME THIS __
OAY Of ______ 20 _ BY ________ _
ANO _____________ _
AIT[Sl -Cfl\'c W!K
Ct.ERK ANO RECORD£R
THIS PLANN£0 UNIT OEV(LCf'M[Ni IS ACCCPT[O fOR flUNG IN Tl\[ CfflC{ or
THE CLERK AND RECORDER Of ARAPAHOE COUNTY. STATE Cf a:x.ORAOO, AT
_____ O'CLOCK _. M., ON !HIS ____ OAY Cf _
------~ A.O., 10~
R[C[PTION NO. _________ OOOK NO. __ _
PAGE NO. ___ _
BY: DV,
QERK DEPUTY
;
I fS
!;; '-
0 ~
>-m
I 3
t
EXH IBIT A
, ~ I' I~ 15
i'.:: z ::,
8
w
0
~1-o_z ;~
i'.:: u
Cl..
0
_J
!s;
w a
NIIM. SlafflAL 9/25/12 .......... ...... _
BA5'Ull£
... NO. Pl.200 ..........
200YUD 2012-10-29.~•9
9HT I OT 4
P1
•
•
•
PUD DISTRICT PLA N DEVELOPMEN T STANDAR DS (CON TINUED)
ACCESSORY USES:
HOME OOOJPrnON AS US!ED IN [NGlEWOOO MU NIOPAL CODE Ti ll[ 16 -UNIFIED
DEYELa:>MEN l CODE
m.tPORARY US[S:
AS usrw IN ENCLEWOOO UUNKl PAL COO[ 111\.l 16 -UNFIED O('IU.(J>M[N I COO [
UN.JSTED USES:
PRoctOURES fOR APPROVAL CJ" USES NO? USlEO IN THE A8Q\,{ PER..O Tl[O USES
9-iALL EE GO\.£RNED BY nTI.£ 16 PRCMSICHS FCR lHJST{D USES.
C. INOU5JBIAl USl:S ¥.\Y SIJHSH O<C[ AND F A CER TI FICAl[ <JC OCCUPANCY (CO) IS ISSUED
HR AMY RESIOCNIIAL USE ON AN Y POffllON <JC !HE PNCl'ER I Y Cll>tRW SY !HIS 1'\10,
""ETHER TH[ PRO?ERT'f IS Pt.ATTID OR NOT, INOIJSlRJAL USES (NOT C()l,IUEROAL OR
PLOUC /INSTITIJTlOHAL ) SHAU NO LONGER BE mmw:o.
0. IX)OC!MJH SINf>AROS:
I. ~UL TI -U NT RESClE:HTIAt.. D'lll{UflCS
a. MAXIMUM 8UlLOING 1£1CHT: 75'-0~
b. SE TBACKS : Al l PUD SETBACKS FOR MULTI-FAMILY USE SHALL 8[ s·-o·
c. IJ£NSITY: MAXIMUM 45 DIIELUNG UNITS PER ACRE (45 DU/ACRE)
d. FLOOR AREA/UNIT: MINIMUM 550 SIJUAR[ mr
e. MAXJUUM n.OOR ARCA RA TIO; NONE
I. MINIM UM OPEN SPACE (INQUDES SDEWALKS): 25%
g. MINIM UM LOT WIDTH : NONE
~ C()l,IMEROAL/t<DUSTRIAL
o. 0£\IELOP MENT STANDARDS FOR COMt-i!EROAL OR IN DU STRIAL USES SHALL COMP LY 'M1H THE
D£Vt:LOPM[NI Rt:GULAIIONS OUIUHEO FON IH£ ("-'-8-1) MIXED-USE C[N IR AL BIJSKSS AH) (1-1)
LIGHT INDU SlRIAL DIsmIcrs FOU ND IN TITLE 16 Of" TH[ ENG.fWOOO UN!fl(O 0£'y{t.0PM ENT COOL
b. MAXIMUM BUIL~G 1£1GH T: NON(
c. SETBACKS: 10· o· FOR ALL NONR£Sl0ENTIAL US£S
3. LAIOSCAPING
E.
SAND CREEK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
A PARCEL O F LAND LOCATE D IN THE NW ¼ OF SECTION 34,
T4S, R68W OF THE 6TH P.M.,
CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE , STATE OF COLORADO
SHEET_2_0 F 4
DISTRICT PLAN / ARCHITECTURAL IMAGES & DETAILS
o. A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE Pl.AN SHALL SE PRO'IID[D AT TI ME Of SIJ8M.ITTAL Of FINAL Sil[ Pl.AN.
◄. PARKING
o. PARKING GU ID ELIN ES W!LL BE PREPARED BASED ON FUTURE D£v£La>MENT US[ ANO 'Mll BE
SU8MITT£D 111TH A FINAL SH[ PLAN AND "LL UTILIZE Till£ 16 Of THE ENGlEV.000 UNIFIED
IJ£11{LOPMENT COD£ AS A BASIS. R[DIJCOOII Of PARKING MAY 8E PROPOSED FOR MULTI -FA.~ILY.
5. PU8JC LANO DED~ATIONS REOU RE"8<TS
a. PARKS. TR ALS, At«> CFCN SP AO:: LANO DEDICA TION SIIMl. OC OCTCR MINC.0 OY SCPAAATE
AGRHMt:NT AT TI WE Cf Fl NAL SI TE PLAN
AROi!U:CTlJRAL STANQ~ROS·
FORM ANO MATERIALS FOR MUl..11-FAMLY HOUSING SHAU HARMCf-llZE ¥UH THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL
BU ILDI NGS NIO BE CONSIOCRATE Of HE!CH80RING BUI.DINGS. SUBMI TTED AS A PAR T <F TH E PROPOS£0 PUO
AR[ OOMPI.[ PHO TOGRAPHS INOiCATING M: G(N(RAL !£,0. Of OCSIOI OlJAUT'r, AHISHES A/10 MAl'ERtALS
TO BE IN CCRPCRA TED IN THE PRO JECT.
1. FAl;AOES: EXT£RK>R WALLS GR£AT[R THAN 50 FEET IN l£NGTH SHOOLD BREAK ANY Fl AT. Mo-nlntC
FACAIJ£ Wi lli O,SCERHl!llf ARCH!ll:CJURAL lllMEHTS. BUIUJlffC OCSl<J<S, ROOfUN[!i_ 00 FACAD[ TR(AflEHTS
TH AT AR£ MOl«>TONOUS AR£ STRONCU DISCOURAG:D. 8UILDISG FACAD[S llRl'NTED TO Tl£ STREH OR f.
l'\IBUC SPACE SHOUI.D PR Ov1tlE ARCHl!ECl\JRAL VARIETY A/I D SCALE 8Y INCORl'O<All<G ELEMEN !S SUCH AS
BA Y WOOWS, DOCWMAY'S, ENTRANC[S NfJ WIOOOWS, BALCONIE S, CORNC£S, COLUMNS. VERTICAL f\.ANE
BRf.t.KS, AN O OTHER T'l'PES CJ" AAOt lTECTUR AL OHAJUNG fO PRQ\ADE 1/tSUAL !NTER EST.
2. 360 -DEGREI: A 9.JI LOING'S SP£0AL AROilTEC TIJRAJ... FEATUR ES ANO TREATMENTS SHAU NOT BE
RCSTRIC TE O TO A SINGLE FA CADE . ALL SIDES Cf" A BUl.DINC OPEN TO \AEW BY lH[ PU8UC. 'M-f(TH(R W:WE:O
FRO W PUBLIC ~ PRIVATE PRCfl£RTY, SHALL DISPLAY A SIMILAR L£~ or QU ALI TY ANO ARCHITECI\JRAL.
INTERES T. AROilTrCTllRAL F£ATUR£S SUOt AS WNOOWS, AYltlw-«;S, PRo.£CTI(l,l$, RE\ltALS, OiAN<tS IN
PAITTRN , AND TRELLISfS SHOU.D BE USED Cfl Al l SIO[S roo VISUA L INTERt:ST. THE OIMENSlllNS (JC BASE.
MIOOL[, AND HP (;:}t()JL.D BE CARRIED AROUND FRCW TH[ PRIMARY f Ac;M)[S 10 rH[ SIDE At«) REAR or IHE
BUIUll NG.
J. Fl.AT ROCf'S: OCSI~ ELEMENTS F~ FLAT ROc:J' BUILDINGS ~W t"ICL [l[ P.ARAPETS "1TH VARIABL[
HEIGH AND/OR CHANGCS IN Sl:T8ACK . WM ERE POSSIBI.[, RO<JCT<P AREAS ARE ENCOURAGEO TO BE USED FOR
PUBUC OR PRIVAI[ OO TDOOR SPACE.
4. Sl.(J>[O RW'S: HN SLOPED ROOfS J.R£ US[O, AS LEAST ON[ or THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS SHOULD
8[ INCORPORATED INTO lliE DE~CN INCtUDING PRO..CCTING GAB LE S, HIPS HCRIZOS TAL/ll{R TI CAL BREAKS. OR
OTHER ~MILAR TE CHNIQUES. Roor SllAP [S ~•ouLD 8[ AN INTE GRAL PAR T Of 111[ BIJILDING AROIIT[CTUR[
ANO CREA TE INTERES TING ANO VAR IED APPEARANCE S.
5. BRIGHT COLORS: INTENSE. BRIGHT. OR FLUORESCENT COLORS SHOULD NOT BE USED AS THE
PREDOMINANT COl.m ON ANY WALL, OR ROOf' OF ANY PRIMARY OR ACCESSORY STRUC TURE.
6. BU ILDING MA TE RIAL S: EXTERIOR BULDING F Al;AOCS SHOJLD EXHIBIT ttGH L[ll{LS C, DE5'GN. DETAILING.
AND •ATERIAL OOA TY. A MI X <JC HIQJ OUAUIY COl,IPATI8LE •ATERIALS IS STRO<GlY ENCOURAG[D ON All
FAl;AOCS FAONG STRffl5-OR OlHER PUllJC SPACES OR AR£A S. BIJILOo,(;S SHOULD BE CONSTRUCT£ll or
DURA8l £. lfQH'.XJAl.llY )il.A TER!AlS SUCH AS: 8RI Q;:, ST<H:, ARCH!T(CTURAl PRC-CAST CONCRCTC,
AROIITECTURAU.Y CAST CONCR£1[, CAS T STOH£, INTEGRAU.Y CCl.<E£0 SPlll ~ GROlN) rACJ.. CONCRE:Tl
MASONRY UNITS, srucoo 00 EFS (EXll:RIOR INSUU. TED FlNISHNG SYSll:M). ARCH!ll:Cl\JRAL METAL. \\IX)(),
LAP 9DING. OR AN Y COMBINA TIO< C, T>lE MA TE RIALS LISTED.
7. SCALIN G: 8UI.DIHC >ACAD£S Sl,OIJLD !N(lUO[ A COM81NATION <JC ll£TAI.S TO FNHANCF lli[
A'O<IIECIIJRAL INTERES T. FOR EXAMPU, USE 8RICXWOR1< TO CREAi[ UNKlUE I.WIENIS. OR UIX MAf£RIALS
Of VAR'1HG OCPlli TO PROWlE ~SUAL IN![R[ST.
~
I. 9Tl' P\.J.N : A FNAL ~l[ PL AN FOR RESllENTIAL USES \'Ill BE REVIEYl!'O FOR APPROVAL IN ACCOROAN C[
\IIITH Tli!S PUO ~D ITS STA.MOAROS BY THE PlANNING COMMISSION 'tllllH A RECOMMENDA TI ON TO QTY
COJNOL OTY COUNO L WU MAKE A FlNAl DC ClSI ON REGARDING APPROVAL Of' A SITE PLAN. If' ANY SITE
PLAN IS SUBMITT(D FOR PUIUC/INS TI TUTIONAL, COMMERCIAL, OR INDUSTRIAL USES. IT 'Mll SE PROC[SSED
ADMINISTRATill{LY AS AllOYl!'D SY THE UIIFIEO D[ll{LOPMENT GOOE.
2. MOOlflCA TI~s · nt( rcuowNG MOOl nc;.. TION PROCEDURES AR£ CONSISTENT 'MTH TI!( PU D MOD lnCA TIC»i
PROCWJR[S C, TIC Cll'f (JC ENGlC:WOOO Tl n.E 16, ZONING REGULATIONS, AS MOOIFlED SELOW:
o. OISTRICI PLAN: !HE IERMS. CONlllllCNS, IHE ADOP TED PUO DISlRlCT PLAN AND DOCUM£N 1S MA Y BE
CHANG[D AND/OR AMENDED IN 'M-UE 00: IN PAR T AS FOLLOWS:
i. UINCI? MODI FICArlONS TO fHE Pt.JO DISTRICT Pl.AN : lttE OTY MANAGER OR HIS;\O' DESJGNEE MAY
APPR0\1: MINOR MOOlr!CATIONS IN D-IE LOCATION, SIZING, AN D t-£ICHT Cf" STRUC TUR[S OR rAOU TI [S
If REOOIRID BY ENCINEERtNG OR Oll£R OROJMSTANCES NOT FORESEEN AT lH[ TI ME THE PUO
[)STRICT Pl.AH WAS APPROVED. MINOR MOOlflCATIONS SHAU. NOT B[ PERMITT£0 If THE MOD IFlCAOON
RESU LTS IN AJj Y Of TH E C!ROJMS TANCES LISTED IN E.2.b,i Cf' THIS PUD.
MAJOR MOOIFlCATIONS TO THE Pl.ID DIS'!RICT Pl.AN: MAJOR MOOflCATIONS MAY BE MAD£ TO TH E
APPRO~ PtJ0 DISTRICT Pt.AN PUR9.JANT TO TH [ SA.\IE UMITA TIONS AN O REQUIREMEN TS BY WHOt
PLANS A/ID DOC\MN TS ~R[ OR IGINALL Y APPROll{D.
b. SI TE PLAN :
i. MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE PLO SITE PlAN: THE C!TY, THROOGH THE DEV£LOP MEN T REVIE W TEAM ,
MAY AUT HORIZE D['IIA nONS FROM lliE PUD 9TE PLAN WMEN SUCH DE~A TI DN S APPEAR NECESSARY
IN LIGHT or TECHNICA L OR ENGINEERING CON9DERAnONS; MNOR DrnATIONS SHALL NOT 8[
PER MIT IED If ANY OF !H t: C!RCIJMSIANC£S RESULT:
i.o. A CH.A.NGE IN TH E CHARACT£R Of THE OEVElCJ'MENT: OR
i.b. A CHAN GE IN TH E PfRMITTEO LANO US£$; OR
;.c. A CHANGE IN TH E GENERAL LOCA !ION (JC lAHIJ USES; OR
;.d. AN IN CREASE IN Tl£ MAXIMUM lfl(}ff CF AIIY llJlLIJING Of MORf lliAN 5ll; OR
i.~. AN INCREASE IN TH[ NUM8ER <Y' O'll{UlNG UNITS, OR IN THE RA TIO Of THE GROSS FLOOR
ARCA CJ:' S TRUC TUR($ TO THC LANO ARCA. OR INCRCASCS IN OtC PROP OSCO CROSS rt OCR
AREA ill ll!IN ANV PAR TICULAR LAND US[ C, MORE n!AN 2ll; OR
U. A REDUC Tl ()I " Tl£ S[TBAO(S IIORE THAN 10ll; OR
i.g. AN IH<."REASE CJ' MOOE Hi Ni 10%, IN GRWHD COVIBACl:, BY S IRVC IUHl:.S ~ SURFACE
PARXING; OR
i.h. A R£0UC TI ON BY MCH:: THAN 5% IN lHE LANO AREA OESI GHA TIOH FOR LMOSCAPING; m
i.i. A REDUCTIC»i BY WORE lHAN 5% IN THE RATIO OF IJT-STREET PARKING ANO LOAOIHC
SPACE 10 Gl«);s FLOOR AREA OR NUMBER <JC (lll[WNG UNIIS
;, sm PlA/1 AMENDMENTS NOT UHTING THE ABQ\/{ REOOIREMENTS: All PUD ~Tr PlAIIS ,PPROll{D
AND RECORDED MAY ONLY BE A.MEN DED PURSUANT TO THE SAME LIMITATION AND REQUIR EMEN TS BY
YIH ICH SUCH PLANS WERE APPROVfD .
MUL 11 -FAMIL Y ARCHITECTURAL EXAMPLES
W ·f ii Z: --~ ...1£ w go I· "C ~1 V> I < ~" r CQ §I
~"'
& ; :::, ; p I ~ w F
lo!' < ~ c e
1i;
I 3
6
u
~
lg
~
~ ~
a I"
°' ~ ; " ~ ~
i5
;>::.
z ::,
0 u
w 0
~f-
"-Z ':]
j ;;:w <( «::::;; I-
0.... w
0 Cl
_J .;;; w
I > (/)
w w
'-" Cl <(
!::: ~
~ __J z < <(
::> ~ a:: ::,
Cl I-u w a, w z I-Jt :c I z u <( 5 a::
_J U) <(
0....
-----:::.:: z w :3
~ w ()._ 0::: u I-u
8 0 a':
I-Q Z (/)
i'::,<( ci
5 (/)
~ ,.._
0
;>::. u ,.,.~~raCT
P'ORANDClt alHMIOf ----
...... l't200 ---200.-PUD :2012 -10-29.dwq
Nl1 2 0f'4
P2
•
I
~ § • aQ s
t1
' ~
le
§
0'1
~
'>
8
i
::::
$
s! ,,,
0
$ :,-
t ,,,
0
' ~ ..,
~
C
a'
I
8
~ ·i
%
j
~ • ..
' 8 ::,.
':j
u z
" z
l z
SAND CREEK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NW ¼ OF SECTION 34,
T4S, R68W OF THE 6TH P.M.,
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO
SHEET_3_0F_4_
EXISTING SITE PLAN
LE.GOO
P\J D BOONDARY
------INTERIOR PARCELS
------EASE MEN"!S
-------AUOUOT UN(
RAILROAD
---------AD JACENT PARCELS
CONTOUR UN[
50
N
GRAPHC SCALE
0 50
(IN f"EET)
l~CH •50rT
EXISTING SITE PLAN
100
LU go
z I
II
go -c
...I .,
£
LU go I·
V, 1 ~1
<( .5 ~~ r ca §I
~"
I; I;;;, I; 1~ u 15 I ~
t,/' < g
0 ~
ii;
I ~ i ~
u
~
~
~ 3 F ~
!I, I"
i i
! i
i'= z ::,
0 u
w
0
;l,f-c..z
~ ~w -<::::E
CL
0
....J
I ~ w
0
'= ~ z
""' _;
Z< o._
::::, "' w
0~ >-v; w~ <.:) z~ z I ~6 F
U1
....J <D x
CL w
::.::: w
~ w
et:::
(_)
8 0 o z
~<( 5 (/)
z w
'-'-0
>-
u
PIIPADUIIIJIHDaC'I' _.,
GIi). Pl100 --200...PUO 10l2-10-29-0Wljl
.at J a, 4
•
•
i
3
1
N
~
6
~
0
~ z
t
~
0
' !
~
0
a',
8
i -~
i
j • t ,;
~
0
0
~
~
~ z
~ ;;-
z
SITE PLAN NO TES:
I. THIS SIT[ PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL AN D IS A REP RES ENTATI ONAL DEPICTION OF ON[
POSSIBLE ALTER NA Tl\/£ fOR DEVELOPMENT.
2 THE SI TE DATA TABLE AND SCHEDULE OF UNITS ANO PARKING SPACES AR E ARE
BASED ON THE CON CE PTUAL PLAN.
LAND SC APING NOTES:
1. TOTAL PROVIDED LAND SC APE AREA CALC ULATION S ARE BASED ON TH E
CONCEP TUAL SITE PlAN . A FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN WILL BE SUB MITTED 111TH A
FIN AL SITE PLAN .
2. EXACT DESIGN INC LU DING LOCA TlON OF TREE S, SHRUBS, PLANTING BEDS, ETC. 111LL
BE DETE Rt.l lNED AT TIME Of FlNAL DE SIGN.
3. LANDSCAP E PLANS SHOW PRELIM INARY CONCEPT AND PLANTS MAY BE Pl.ACED
AN Y PLACE 111 THIN THE SITE BOUNDARY.
4. PLANTS SHALL BE USED THAT ARE 11!:LL ADAPTED TO COLORADO 'S CLI MATE .
FQ LOW1NG TH E an OF [NGtEII\JOD LANDSCAPE MANUAL'S RECOI.II.AENDA TIONS IS
ENCOURAGED.
5. TREES LOCATED IN TH[ STREET BUFFER SHAL L BE SPACED A MINIJdUM OF JO'.
a;i
r
!!J
' ~
t
I ~ s ~ I §
a
1111
SAND CREEK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NW ¼ OF SECTION 34,
T4S, R68W OF THE 6TH P.M ..
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE , STA TE OF COLORADO
SHEET__A_OF _L
CONCEPI'UAL SITE PLAN
. . . . . . .
• • • • ♦ • • •
• • • • ♦ • • • . . . . . . . .
• + + • • + + •
• • • ♦ • • ♦ + . . . . . . .
• • • ♦ • • .. •
• • IJEJrt,iTION • •
• • • • • • ~ON~. • • • • • . . . . . . . ........ . . . . . . .
W. BAT&1 AVR
1/.
• <I
•••• 32 • I.-, MULTIFAMILY
•• • ~ UNITS
. :~ -r:l-✓--~:-J. -FJ-. 00 ... . . ~ . . .
• 24' • •
~
9
...s
5' SH8ACKS
Lfil.!'!ll.
PUO BOUNDARY
------S[IDACK S
EXISTING CURB
1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 IN T[RIOR LANOSCAP£
~ STREETSCAPE
SITE DAf A TABLE
TYPE AREA (SQUARE FEE T)
STIREETSCAPE 21,289
INTERIOR LANDSCAP ING 182 ,377
BUI LDI NGS 102,136
PAR KING 156,429
TO TAL 462,231
SCHEDULE Of UNI IS AND PARKING
TYPE
RESIDENTIAL UNIT S
PARK ING SPA CES
N
GRAPHIC SC\1.£
50 0 50
I H H H
(IN FUT)
1 INC>4 • 50 n
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
100
I
QUANTITY
344
414
PERCENT(%)
5
39
22
34
100
w go
·=-z ;::
II
.;:
go -·a
...J C
,£ w go !· ·c: ~1 V, I < ~"' r co d ~ ..
' ' :::, ' 1~ .~ 15 ii 3: w
lo!' < ~
0 ~
,..
m
I 3
~ ~
~ z
~
~
:'i
i's ~-
F I"'
a '" ~-.. ; u
~ ~
i5
i': z ::,
0 u
w
0
;;: f-a.z
~ «w ~:::::. a..
0
_J w
I > w z Cl :3
!= ~ CL
Z< w
:::::, V, >-
vi
Cl~ _J
w~ <(
z,. ::,
>-
i ~o CL w u _J <O z a.. 0 u
:,,,: w
~ w a::: u
§o
~z
w < <3 (/)
i3
c._
0
i': u
....,~~tatr
IRll aarTTM. 9/15/12
ClflA-UE 24"X31,i"
llltWTnw ~0.-.11
8AS(lJ,I(
ONO. Pt.700
,.. __
200....PUD 2012 -10-29.d.-g
IHttf 4 or ◄
P4
,
• COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: Ordinance rezoning Sand
Creek parcel from Light Industrial (1-1)
January 22, 2013 11 a ii and General Industrial (1-2) to Planned
Unit Development (PUD)
INITIATED BY : STAFF SOURCE:
Community Development Audra L. Kirk, Planner I
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Council continued the first reading concerning the proposed Sand Creek Planned Unit Development on
December 1 7, 2012 , in order for staff to work with the applicant to modify the PUD to address the
concerns of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
PREVIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
• The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the Sand Creek PUD at a Public Hearing on November
20, 2012. The Commission considered public testimony and voted 7 to 2 against forwarding the proposed
rezoning to PUD to City Council with a recommended action for approval with the following conditions:
•
1. Final site plan approval will happen at a later date and will need to receive Planning and Zoning
approval and City Council approval
2. Provide an access easement to the future Bates Light Rail Station platform. Details to be
finalized at the site plan approval.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends approval of the ordinance rezoning the Sand Creek parcel from 1-1 and 1-2 to PUD. The
attached Council Bill would approve a modified PUD District Plan that addresses the issues identified by
the Planning and Zoning Commission. Staff further recommends that Council set February 4, 2013 as the
date for a Public Hearing.
BACKGROUND
The Planned Unit Development is a rezoning process that establishes specific zoning and site planning
criteria to meet the needs of a specific development proposal that may not be accommodated within
existing zoning development regulations. A PUD rezoning provides the opportunity for unified
development control for multiple properties or multiple uses .
This prnpc-~rty is a 10.0 ·1 acr e sit e occ upied by Gen eral Iron Works for many years. RTD acquired a pmtion •
of th e G IW pa rcel for it s mainte nance facility in 2002. Sand Creek acquired its owners hip in th e GIW
parce l in 20'! 0. The parcels hav e be e n zo ned Industrial sinc e the first zoni n g was put in place in 1940.
PUD OVERVIEW
Th e Sand Cr ee k PUD wi ll change the Permitted Pr incipa l Us es lo all ow resid enti al and ce 1·tain co mm erc ial
pub li c/institutional and indu strial uses as outl in ed in th e attached Ordinan ce Jnd PUD Distri c t Plan. Som e
uses und e r the existing 1-1 and 1-2 zoning have b ee n elimin at ed, such as c r em at o rium and waste /salvage
o perations . Sarne uses not allowed under the current zoning, such as p arks and librari es, have been
includ e d in th e list of allowed uses.
A sunset clause has been added to the PUD approval ordinance that stipulates when a Certificate of
Occupancy (CO) is issued for any residential use on any porti on of the property covered by this PUD,
whether the p roperty is platted or not, industrial us es (not comme rcial or public/institutional) shall no longer
be allowed.
The site plan has been submitted for conceptual purposes only. A site plan for residential uses will n ee d
Planning and Zon in g C o mmission review and Council approval. A site plan for any use other than
r eside ntial will not require review and approval by the Commission or City Council. With the exception of
a few pub li c/institutional uses and conditiona l uses, all sit e plan s for uses in the 1-1 and 1-2 zone distri cts
c urrently are reviewed administrative ly and the PUD propos es no c hang es to this procedure.
Devel op ment standards have been outlin ed in th e PUD District Plan and are as fo ll ows:
Th e maximum dwelling units per acre is prop osed to be set at 45 , r esu ltin g in a max imum of 477 units .
Th e proposed Sand Creek PUD has set the ma x imum height limitati on for multi-family residential at 75'.
The Unified Development code (UDC) has a maximum height limitation of 32' in all residential zone
districts. This is a difference of 43' or approximately 4 stories. The setbacks fo r the Sand Creek PUD are
proposed to be 5' from all property lines. The UDC's current standards for multi-family in the MU-R-3 -B
zone district are 1 5' front and side setback and a 25' rear setback.
The development standards for the industrial uses shall be consistent with the UDC requirements in the 1-2
zone district with the exception of the setbacks . The proposed PUD will have a required minimum setback
of 1 O' from all property lines. The UDC requires a 1 O' setback only where a building abuts upon, adjoins,
or is adjacent to a residential zone district. The Sand Creek PUD would not have a height limitation with
industrial uses.
The arch ite ctura l standards that are outlin ed in the PUD are very similar and/or more stringent to the
arch it ectura l standards for multi-unit residenti al uses list ed in the UDC.
Procedures for minor modifications to the PUD are consistent with th e UDC, and are typically review ed by
the Development Review Team and approved through the permitting process. Major modifications to the
PUD are also consistent with UDC and require Planning and Zoning and City Council approval. Major
modifications are required under the following circumstances:
• A change in the character of the development; or
• A change in the permitted land uses; or
•
•
,
• • A change in the general location of land uses; or
• An increase in the maximum height of any building of more than 5%; or
• An increase in the number of dwelling units, or in the ratio of the gross floor area of structures
to the land area, or increases in the proposed gross floor area within any particular land use of
more than 2%; or
• A reduction of more than 5% in the land area designation for landscaping; or
• A reduction by more than 5% in the ratio of off-street parking and loading space to gross floor
area or number of dwelling units.
Landscaping: A complete lands caping plan will be prov ided at time of final submittal of the site plan.
Parking: Parking guidelines will be prepared based on future development use and will be submitted with
the final site plan. The developer may ask for a reduction in parking for multi-family housing due to the
proximity of light rail.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The financial impact will be different under the v arious development scenarios allowed under this PUD , so
it is difficult to provide information at this time .
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
•
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission Findings of Fact
Bill fo r Ordinance
•
• MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
Planning and Zoning Commission
Alan White, Director, Community Development \/'
Audra L. Kirk, Planner 1 ✓
November 20, 2012
Case ZON2012-007 -Public Hearing
Sand Creek
Case ZON2012-008 -Public Hearing
WH In vestments
Baseline Corporation
700 12 th Street
Suite 220
.I
• Golden, CO 80401
•
PROPERTY OWNER SANDCREEK:
Sand Creek Investors, L.L.C
3002 South Huron Street
Englewood, CO 80110
PROPERTY OWNER W H INVESTMENTS:
W H Investments, Inc.
3002 South Huron Street
Englewood, CO 80110
PROPERTY ADDRESS SANDCREEK (North Property):
601 West Bates Avenue
En glewood, CO 80110
PROPERTY ADDRESSES W H INVESTMENTS ( South Property):
700 West Cornell Avenue
775 West Dartmouth Aven u e
3001, 301 1 and 3025 South Galapago Street
3002, 3018 and 3050 Sou th Huron Street
Englewood, CO 80110
1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, Colorado 80 110 PHONE 303-762-2342 FAX 303-783-6895
www.en glewoodgov.org
REQUEST:
Th e r.1pp li c;1nt has submi tted two applications, Sand Creek PUD (referred to as the north
property) and W 1-1 In ve stm e nts PUD (referred to as th e south property) to r ezo n e the
c1bove par ce ls from 1-1 Light Indu st rial and 1-2 General Industrial zoning to a PUD Planned
Unit D eve lop m e nt. The proposed PUD will c1llow multi-famil y r es id e nti al as a permitted
us e, in add ition to ex i stin g in dust ri al permitted u ses. Conceptur.1I site plans have bee n
sublllitt ecl because developm e nt o n the tw o sit es lik ely w ill n o t happen in th e n ea r te rm.
As mark et co ndition s evo lve in th e futu1 ·e, sil e plan s and d et c1 il s 177 c1y c h a n ge. Th e app li cant
is seek in g ap proval of th e co n ce plu ~1I sit e plans; h oweve r, th e p l ans have n o t prov id ed Ci ty
st aff with e nough detail to provid e llleaningful review comments. Staff i s r eco mlll e ndin g
t h at whe n deve lopment i s more ce rtain in the future, site plans be review ed at publi c
h ea 1·in gs a nd befor e Planning and Zo ning and City Council. The Planning and Zo nin g
Co mrni ss ion ca n 1·eco lllm e nd an alternative.
RECOMMENDATIONS NORTH PROPERTY:
The Departlllent of Community D eve l op ment reco lllmend s that the Planning and Zoning
Comrn iss i on approve Sa nd Creek PUD Di strict r:ilan w ith th e following co nditions:
1. Final site plan approva l will happ en at a lat er da t e and will ne ed to r ec eive Planning
and Zoni ng approval a nd City Co un c il approva l, and forward a recommendation of
approva l to City Council.
RECOMMENDATIONS SOUTH PROPERTY:
•
The Department of Community D eve lopment r ecom m end s that the Planning a nd Zoni n g
Commission approve W 1-1 Inv est m ent PUD District Plan w ith the following co nditions: •
1. Final site plan approval w ill h appe n at a lat e 1· date and will n ee d to rec eive Plannin g
and Zoning approval and City Co un c il approva l,
2. Provide space for the future placement of RTD 's Bates Street Light Rail Station
platform.
3. Single family residential units sho uld be r eg ul ated und e r the dimensional standards
of th e R-1-C zone district.
And forward a recommendation of approval to City Council.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION NORTH PROPERTY:
THAT PART OF LOT 1 GENERAL IRON WORl<S SUB DESC AS BEG AT THE SW COR OF
SD LOT TH A LG CURVE TO LEFT 201.64 FT TH NE 297.55 FT TH ALG CURVE RT 73 .2 FT
TH NE 512.81 FT TH SE 265.47 FT TH S 53.29 FT TH ALG CURVE RT 47.52 FT TH SW
116.33 FT TH W 28.26 FT TH S 656.3 7 FT TO THE SECOR OF SD LOT TH W 734.44 FT
TO BEG GENERAL IRON WORKS SUB
LEGAL DESCRIPTION SOUTH PROPERTY:
BEG 200 FT E & 20.6 FT N OF SW COR NW 1/4 SW 1/4 NW 1/4 SEC 34 TH N 519.4 FT
TOE LINE OF AT & SF RR RT/WAY TH SWLY ALG SD LINE 563 FTTO S LINE NW 1/4 SW
1/4 NW 1/4 THE 121.5 FTTH N 20.6 FTTH E 40.5 FTTO BEG SEC 34-4-68
E 130 FT OF W 1/2 NW 1/4 SW 1/4 NW 1/4 EX AT & SF RR RT/WAY & EX ROADS SEC
34-4-68
2
•
• LOTS 14-19 & VAC ST ADJ ON W & RES STRIP ON S OF LOT 19 BLK 1 TAY LORS ADD
LOTS 46-49 BLK 1 TAYLORS ADD
•
•
LOTS 44-45 BLK 1 TAYLORS ADD
LOTS 42-43 BLK 1 TAYLORS ADD
LOTS 1-6 BLK 1 TAYLOR'S A DD TOG WITH VACATED W CORNELL AVE ADJ ON THE
NORTH & VACATED S HURON ST ADJ ON THE WEST EX THAT PART NOW KNOWN
AS THE CORNELL STREET TRIANGLE
LOTS 7-9 & VAC ST ADJ ON W BLK 1 TAYLORS ADD
LOTS 10-13 & VAC ST ADJ ON W BLK 1 TAYLORS ADD
ZONE DISTRICT NORTH PROPERTY:
1-1 Light Industrial
1-2 General Industrial
ZONE DISTRICT SOUTH PROPERTY:
1-1 Light Industrial
R-2-B Medium-density single and multi-dwelling unit residential
PROPERTY LOCATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USE:
The subject property of this PUD is located adjacent to the RTD Light Rail line between
Dartmouth and Bates. Land directly to the west is the RTD Light Rail tracks and the BSNF
railroad tracks and further west beyond South Sante Fe in an industrial zone district and the
Englewood/Littleton Waste Water Tr eatment Plant. Surrounding land to the east is a
con:,bination of 1-1 and R-2-B. This area is a mixture of industrial uses, single and multi-
family housing as well as non-conforming residential units in the industrial districts . North is
the RTD maintenance facility zoned 1-2. To the south is R-2-B zoning and Cushing Park .
PUD PROCEDURE:
Rezoning to a PUD requires the applicant to have a pre-application meeting with staff, a
neighborhood meeting with owners and tenants lo cated within 1,000 feet of the proposed
PUD. After the neighborhood meeting a formal subm ittal is made to the City and reviewed
by City departments and other affected outside agencies. A public hearing is held before
the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If the PUD is approved there is a
30 day referendum time period before permits ca n be granted.
BACKGROUND:
The Planned Unit Development is a rezo ning process that establishes specific zoning and
site planning criteria to meet the needs of a specific development proposal that may not be
accommodated withi n existing zoning dev elopment regulations. A PUD rezoning provides
the opportun ity for unified development cont rol for multiple properties or multiple uses .
3
Th e co mbin ed pro pe rties a re 16 .72 acres and Winslow Const1·uction Cornpany has •
occup i ed th e southern parc el sin ce 1954. General Iron Works occupied th e northern
parc el for 11,any years. RTD acquired a portion of the GIW parcel for its maintenance
fac ility in 2002. Sand Creek acqu ired its ownership in th e G IW p arcel in 20·10 . Parcels
h ave been zo n ed Industrial sinc e the first zoning was put in place in 1940.
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARY:
Pursuant to th e Unified Dev elopmen t Code PUD pro ced ure, th e appli ca nt c onducted a
n e ighborhood m ee tin g o n Wednesday, Jul y 18, 2012, prior to subrnitting the PUD
application. Notice of t he pre-application rn ee ting was rnailed to owners and tenants of
propel'ty loca t ed within 1000 feet of th e proposed PUD property. A rneeting sumrnary is
attac h ed (See Exh ibit A).
CITY DEPARTMENT AND DIVISION REVIEW:
The ap pli ca nts had a pr e-application rneeting w ith st aff in Jun e 20 12. Issues that were
id entifi ed during the pre-application meeting we re addressed by th e applicant and the final
PUD packets were submitted on Septernber 27, 20 12. Th e fin al plans were reviewed by
C ity and outside Age nc ies and the following comrnents were rnade:
Tri-County He alth Department:
1. TCHD encourages the adclition of PUD D eve loprn ent Standards for bicycl e facilities
includin g bik e parking for visitors and res id e nts . •
2. The Sand Creek (North) PUD indi cates detention ponds will b e built on th e
developm ent site . To reduce the potential for human exp osures to West Nile and
other mo squito-born e v iruses, TCHD rec ommend s that mosquito co ntrol plans b e
developed for any storm wa ter faciliti es that are d es i g n ed to hold water for 72hours
or longer.
Xcel Ener gy:
1. Th e Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) owns and operates existing natural
gas and electric distribution facilities within the proposed project area . The
d eveloper must work with Xcel to install any new gas or electric service, or
modification to existing facilities.
BNSF:
1. No comm ent.
Colorado Departm e nt of Tran sportation :
1. No comment.
RTD MC#24
Comments were not provided from this Agency.
4
•
•
•
•
City of Englewood Department Reviews:
Building:
PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
The City of Englewood has adopted 2012 International Codes, in addition to ICC/ ANSI
A 117.1 -2009 Accessibility standards which must be used for building on the site.
Engineering:
A Drainage Report per the Englewood Drainage Criteria Manual must be submitted.
All concrete must be brought to City Standards.
All Drainage must be directed to the Public Way (i.e. street or alley)
All work in the Public Right-of-Way requires permits from Public Works.
Any unused Drive Cuts must be closed per City Standards.
Check list and Drainage review letters are attachments to the project.
All Curb Gutter and Sidewalk will need to be brought up to City Standards, including a new
8 ' (minimum) wide sidewalk.
Drainage report submitted but will not be approved. Site plans are conceptual in nature,
therefore no approval for this design will be completed with this review.
Fire:
1. 503.2 .1 Dimensions. (Amended to read as follows)
Fire Apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 26 feet (1725
mm), exclusive of shoulders, except for approved security gates in accordance with Section
503 .6, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (4115 mm) .
Traffic:
Submitted documents include a conceptual site plan only; location and design of the access
points are not part of this approval. Traffic Impact Study shall be updated when a specific
site plan is submitted. (Community Development comment: Due to the Department
recommendation of the approval of only the District Plans (zoning regulation entitlements)
traffic impacts will be addressed with final site plan submission which the Commission will
review at an additional public hearing).
Utilities:
Plans showing water-sewer-storm and fireline connections to the public mains need to be
submitted for approval.
Community Development:
See comments below.
PUD OVERVIEW:
The Sand Creek and W H Investments PUD 's will change the Permitted Principal Uses to
allow residential uses in addition to the currently allo w ed industrial, office and retail uses.
Other allowed uses in the PUD are outlined under the Table of Allowed Uses in the Written
Statement on the PUD document.
5
Site Plan: The sit e plan has b ee n submitt ed fo r conceptual purposes only. Development •
stand ,ud s have b ee n outlined in th e PUD Distri ct Plan and aI ·e as fo ll ows:
Sand Creek PUD (North Parcel): The maximum dwelling units p e r acr e is proposed to be
se t at 45. On thi s site the total maximum dwellin gs would be 4 50 .
Th e p roposed Sa n d Cr eek PUD has set the m ax imum h ei ght lilllitation for multi-famil y
res identia l ;it 75'. Th e Un ifi ed Deve loplll e nt Co d e (UD C) h as a ma x imum h ei ght limitat ion
o f 32' in J II res i dent ia l zo n e districts. Thi s is a diffe ren ce of 43' or appr ox imately 4 stor i es .
Set b ac ks for th e Sa nd Cre e k PUD are p roposed to be 5' fro171 all property lin es. Th e
UDC's current stand a rd s for multi-family in the MU-R-3-B are 15' front and side setba c ks
a nd 25' rea r se tb ac k s.
The deve lo pm e nt standards for industrial uses shall be consistent w ith th e UDC with th e
exce ption of setbacks. The proposed PUD will have a req uir ed minimum se tback of 1 0'
from all property lin es. The UDC requir es a 1 0' se tback only where a bui lding abuts up o n,
a dj o in s, o r is adjacent to a residential zone distri c t. Industrial and o th er non-residential u ses
wo uld n o t be subject to a height limitat ion.
WH Investment PUD (South Parcel): The rnaxilllUlll dwelling units p er acre ar e proposed
to be set at 45. On thi s site th e total maximum dwellings would be 2 70.
In add ition to all ow in g indu st ri al and lllulti-falllily, the proposed WH In vestment PUD •
wo uld also all ow sin gl e family res id enti al and atta c h e d townhom es. The sin gle family and
attached townhom es wo ul d have the sallle dirn e nsional sta n da rd s as the R-2 -B zo n e district.
The UDC does n o t currently have dimensional standards for attached townhomes.
Residential units that are attached and more than one are conside red multi-unit dwellings.
Staff believes that the single family res id ent ial units should be reg ulated under the
dimensional standards of the R-1-C zone district and th e attached townhollles should be
regulated under the WH Investment PUD Development Standards of the Multi-Unit
Residential Dwellings.
The proposed WH ln vestllle nt PUD has the m1n1111um setback listed as 2', with the
exce ption of a 5' to 1 0 ' se tb ack along the east and west property lines. The 2' setback
wo uld be required along the north and so uth property lines. The UDC has a minimum
setback of 5' for any residential zone district, with th e exception of a small lot of record .
The developm ent standa rds for industrial uses shall be consistent with the UDC with th e
exce ption of setbacks. The proposed PUD will have a required minirnulll setback of 1 O'
from all prop e rty lines. The UDC requires a 1 0' setba ck only where a building abuts upon,
adjoins, or is adjace nt to a residential zone di strict. As with the north parcel, industrial and
othe r non-residential uses would have no height lilllitation.
Architectural Standards (both PUD's): The architectural standards that are outlined in
both PUD's are very similar and /or more stringent to architectural standards for multi-unit •
residential us es listed in the UDC.
6
• Process (both PUD's): The process as outlined in the proposed PUD 's is proposing to
have the Development Review Team as the final approving entity for the final site plan.
Staff believes that the final site plan should be reviewed by Planning and Zoning through a
public hearing and City Council through a public hearing.
Minor modifications to the PUD's are consistent with the UDC, and are t y pically reviewed
by the Development Review Team and approved through the permitting process. Major
modifications to the PU D 's are also consist ent with UDC with the addition of the following:
• A change in the character of the development; or
• A change in the permitted land uses; or
• A change in the general location of land uses; or
• An increase in the maximum height of any building of more than 5%; or
• An increase in the number of dwelling units, or in the ratio of the gross floor area
of structures to the land area, or increases in the proposed gross floor area within
any particular land use of more than 2 %; or
• A reduction of more than 5% in the land area designation for landscaping; or
• A reduction b y more than 5% in the ratio of off-street parking and loading space
to gross floor area or number of dwelling units.
Landscaping (both PUD's): A complete landscaping plan will be provided at time of final
• submittal of the site plan.
•
Parking (both PUD's): Parking guidelines will be prepared based on future development
use and will be submitted w ith the final site plan . The developer ma y ask for a reduction in
parking for multi-family housing due to the proximity of light rail.
SUMMARY:
The applicant is proposing to re-zone two parcels to PUD to include residential uses in
addition to 1-1 and 1-2 uses . Staff is requesting that approval of the final site plan be done
through public hearings at Planning and Zoning and City Council meetings as a condition
of approval of the PUD District Plans .
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS:
The Commission must determine if the PUD is consistent with the Englewood 2003
Comprehensive Plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission can approve, approve with
conditions or deny the proposed PUD.
PUD District Plan
The District Plan sets forth the zoning regulations under which the proposed amendments
will occur.
1. The PUD District Plan is, or is not, in conformance with the District Plan requirements and
the Comprehensive Plan .
7
The proposed PUD is in conformance with the District Plan and the Comprehensive •
!.)Ian. Section 5: Housing, Goal 1 states, "Promote a balanced llliX of housing
opportunities serving the needs of all current and future Englewood Citizens".
Objective 1-3 states, "Encourage housing invest171e11ts that irnprove the housing lllix,
including both smaller and larger unit sizes, and a wider range of housing types,
including single-family, duplex, town home, and condominium units".
2. All req uired docum ents, clravvings, referral s, reco mm endations, and approvals hav e been
rece iv ed.
All appropriate do c ulllents concerning Sand Creek and WH Investment PUD's have
b ee n received; however the proposed F>LJIJ site plans have not been approved by
all departments.
3. The PUD District Plan is consistent with adopted and generally accepted standards of
development in the City of Englewood
The Sand Creek and WH Investments f)LJD District Plans remain consistent with
accepted developrnent standards established by the City of Englewood.
4. The PUD District Plans are su bstantially consistent with the goals, objectives, design
guidelines, policies and any other ordinance, law or requirernent of the City.
Sand Creek and WH Investment PUD's are in conformance with all other •
ordinances, laws and requirements of the City.
5. When the PUD District Plan is within the Englewood Downtown Development Authority
(EDDA) area, the Plan is consistent with the EDDA approved designs, policies and plans.
Not applicable.
PUD Site Plan
The PUD Site Plans will be reviewed and approved at a later date, yet to be determined.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhib it A: Sand Creek PUD District Plan
Exhibit 8: WH Investment PUD Dist1·ict Plan
Exhibit C: Neighborhood Meeting Summary -July 18, 2011
Exhibit D: Clayton letter dated Novelllber 12, 2012
8
•
•
•
•
Planning and Z01;1ing Commission
Public Hearing
Case #ZON20 12-007 Sand Creek PUD , #ZON20 12-008 W H Investment PUD
November 2 0 , 2012
Page 1 of 6
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
November 20, 2012
Minutes and audio are available at:
http://www .englewood gov .org/Index .aspx ?p age=l 52
I. CALL TO ORDER
~:
Th e regular meeting o f the City Planning and Zo ning Commission wa s called to order at
7:00 p.m. in th e City Council Chamb ers of the Engle wood Civic Center, Chair Brick
presiding.
Present:
Abse nt:
Staff:
Bleile, Roth, Welker, Knoth, Fish , Brick, Kinton, Townl ey
Fr ee mire (a ltern at e)
King ( excused)
Alan White, Community De ve lop ment Director
Audra Kirk, Planner I
Na ncy Reid , Assistant City A ttorney
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
November 6 1 2012
Welker m ove d:
Kno th seconded : TO APPROVE THE NOVEMBER 6, 2012 M INUTE S
Chair Brick asked if there were any m odification s or co rrections . Ther e we re non e.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTA IN :
ABSEN T:
Bleile , Roth, Welker, Knoth , Fish , Brick, Kinton
No ne
Townley
Kin g
Moti o n carried .
Ill. PUBLIC HEARING
'[fl]
Case #ZON2012-007 Sand Creek Planned Unit Development and Case #ZON2012-008
W H Investment Planned Unit Development
l'l:11111i11 g :111 d Zoni ng Cum111i ss iun
1'11 li li l' I k :1ri11 g
( ·:1 sl, //'/,( l N:W 12-00 7 S:111(1 C rc:d l'l JD , #ZON2012-008 W f-1 l11 vcstment PUD
Nuvl'l1 1h c r 20 , 2 01 2
C h;1i1 · l'.hick stated there ;:ire two cases to be heard tonight; they will be heard concurrently
but ec1c h will req uir e c1 m o tion and they will be voted on separately.
Fish m ove d:
l~oth seconded: TO OI.)E:N CASE #ZON2012-007 and CASE #ZON20 1 2-008
AYE:S:
NAYS:
Bleil e, Roth, W elk e r, l<no lh, I=ish, 131·ic k1 l<inton, Townl ey
None
ABSTA IN:
/\I3Sl:NT:
None
l<ing
Motion ca rri ed.
[~
•
Ms. l<irk was swo rn in and presented th e case. The app li ca nt has submitted two
ap plications, Sand Creek PUD (refe rr ed to as th e north property) and W H In vest ments
PUD (refer red to as the sout h property) to rezone the above parcels from 1-1 Li ght
Indu stri al and 1-2 General Industri al zoning to a PUD Planned Unit Development. The
propos ed PUD w ill allow rnulti-famil y res id en ti al as a permitted u se, in add ition to ex istin g
indu strial permitted us es. Conceptual sit e plans have been submitted because development
on th e two sit es lik e ly will not happe n in the near tern1. As market co nditions evo lve in the
futu1 e, site plans and d etails m ay change. Staff is reco mmending that when dev elopm ent is •
more ce rtain in the future, site plans b e rev i ewe d at public hearings before the Planning
c1nd Zo nin g Comm i ss ion and C ity Coun c il.
Ms. l<irk discussed leg al descriptions of both properties, current zo ne districts, property
location and surrounding land use, PUD procedures, background information of the
property, neighborhood meeting summary, City depa1·tment and division review, and an
overview of both proposed PUD's.
[~
APPLICANT TESTIMONY
The applicant provid ed a slide show of the proposed PUD 's. Mr. Vincent Harris, Planning
Director for Baseline Corp., Mr. Fred Lantz, T raffic Engineer for Baseline Corp., and Mr.
Bryant Winslow, owne r of the properties provided testimony.
Issu es discussed were co ntamination on the property, setbacks, h eight restriction s,
exa mples of what buildings may look lik e, co-mingling of residential use along with
indu st rial us e, adding a provision that states the industrial uses go away when residential
comes in, parking guidelines, density of development, is the Bates Station still an option,
wou ld applicant develop the property or sell to a developer, traffic flow and entrance
placement to the development. •
•
•
•
Planning and Zoping Commi ss ion
P ublic Hearing
Case #ZO N201 2 -007 San d Creek PUD, #ZON2012-00 8 W H Inves tm ent P UD
November 2 0 , 2 01 2
P age 3 of 6
~
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
Testimony was heard from :
• Vera Montez
• Patrick Draper
• Matth ew Reeves
• Le w is Fowl er
fill
Fish moved:
l<noth seconded: TO CLOSE CASE #ZON2012 -007 and #ZON2012-008
A YES:
N AYS :
Bleile, Roth , Welker, Knoth, Fish , Brick, Kinton, Townley
N one
ABSTAIN : None
A BSENT : King
Motion carried.
Knoth moved:
Fish seconded:
Discussion Points:
THAT CASE #ZO N2 0 7 2-007, SANO CREEK PLA NN ED UN IT
DEVELOPMENT BE RECOMMEN DED FOR APPROVAL TO CITY
COUN CIL W ITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMEN DATIO N FOR
ADOPTION W ITH THE FOLLOWIN G CON DITIO N S:
• Final site plan approval will happen at a later date and
will ne e d to receive Planning and Zoning approval and
City Council approval.
• Access to the future Bates Street Light Rail stati on
platform shall be moved from the so uth property to th e
north prop erty .
► Great project for this area; in favor of this type of development.
► A PUD is appropriate for the area if the Bates Street Station Light Rail station is built;
if not, density is too high.
► Very concerned about mixing residential with industrial uses .
► N eed prov ision that industrial goes awa y when residential deve lopment occurs .
► Planning and Zonin g C o mmission sh o uld see a Site Plan ; this is just a general Di strict
Plan .
► Don 't like requ est t o remo v e the Planning and Zoning Commi ss ion a nd City C oun c il
from Publi c H ea rin gs to re v ie w Sit e Pl an .
l'l;11 111i11g ;111d L',<111i ng Co 111111i ss io11
l'uhlil · I Jc ;1ri11)c'.
C';1 sr Ill,< >N2 01 2 -00 7 S,1ntl Cn:ck PU D. i/ZON2012-00S W H l nvestment PUD
Nov t:nih e r 20, '.?.012
► l ·l a t d l o 1T1;1ke a dec i sion w ith out more in fo rmation.
► Needs o p e n space.
► Would fl ex space b e all owe d ?
► T oo many unr eso lved i ss u es.
Co mm e nts fr o m Commi ss i o n :
M r. 1=ish sa i d w hile the ge n e ra l 11atu1·e of this proj ec t in many ways i s cons i st e nt with th e
Co mp 1·e he n sive Pla n and I wo uld lik e Lo see thi s ar ea go thi s di r ectio n, th e re are too many
unr es o lved iss u es w ith th e applicant's prese ntat ion a nd incons i ste n c i es such as n o t
add r ess in g h ow t h e zo nin g fit s togeth e r . T hi s wou ld create a mi xed zo nin g in th e area. It i s
way too sp ec ulativ e.
M r. Welke r sa i d h e wanted to l et eve ryo n e at th e hear in g know he i s not again st
deve lopment in this a rea. He sa i d he do es n't b eli eve thi s p rope rt y c urren tly ha s th e type of
request before u s th at i s ve rifi ab l e to th e p eop le who liv e th e 1·e and to th e C ity.
Ms. To w nl ey said sh e definite ly wa nts to see deve lop ment in th e area . Th e re 's just not
e nou gh in fo rn1 ation to ap prov e.
•
M r. Bl ei l e sta t ed thi s parti c ul a r property h as so m e tremendous pote nt i a l fo r everybody •
in vo lved a nd wou l d lik e to see it red eve l oped to its highest and best u se. He f e lt th e
app li ca n t's intent i s to do the right thing. H e stated h e underst a nd s Mr. Win sl ow's n eed t o
keep his b u sin ess go ing th e r e at thi s tim e and is fine with h aving both r eside nti a l and
industrial uses , but th e re co ul d h ave been additiona l deta il provid ed to the Comm iss i on.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTA I N:
ABSENT:
Moti on fai l ed.
l@
l<n o th, Brick
Bleile, Roth, Welker, Fi sh, l<into n, Townley
None
l<ing
Welk e r moved:
Bleile seco nd ed: TO INCORPORATE Tl-IE DISCUSSION FROM CASE #ZON2012-
007 IN TO THIS CASE. CASE #ZON2012-008, W H INVESTMENT
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BE RECOMMENDED FOR
APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION FOR A DOPTIO N WITH THE
FOLLO W I N G CONDITIONS: •
•
•
•
Planning and Zoning Commission
Public f,-Iearing -
Case #ZON2012-007 Sand Creek PUD . #ZON2 012-008 W H Inv es tment PUD
Nove mber 20 , 2012
Page 5 of 6
•
•
Final site plan approval will happen at a later date and
will need to receive Planning and Zoning approval and
City Council approval, and
Delete ''and attached townhome use 11 from C 7 a of the
PUD District Plan Development Standards.
Discussion Points for this case were included in the previous PUD.
Mr. Bleile wanted the applicant to know the Commission is not against the development of
this property. We want to see it happen. He asked that they not give up on it and go away.
He said he would be very amicable to seeing some further discussion occur. If the
Commission 's concerns are addressed in a future presentation it's a no brainer.
Mr. Fish said with some modifications this could work for all.
Mr. Welker said he is very much in support of Roadmap Englewood. His problem with what
was proposed tonight is that it isn't concrete enough to give us assurance, to the city and to
the people we represent of what is going to happen there; that happens at the Site Plan
review. Allowing residential on the property is not the problem.
Ms. Reid said the Commission could take a short recess and let Staff and the applicant work
on wording the Commission is having difficulty with.
Mr. Welker said, in his opinio1\ it's not a five to ten minute solution. He suggested the
discussion continue to a date certain.
Chair Brick asked the members if they wanted to take a recess to allow Staff time to add a
condition or have him call for the question. Consensus was to not take the recess time;
Chair Brick called for the question.
Comments from Commission :
··~; AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Motion failed.
Knoth, Brick
Bleile, Roth, Welker, Fish, Kinton, Townley
None
King
IV. PUBLIC FORUM
~·
Mr. Fowler wished to sp ea k about the Sand Creek property. The Commission invited him to
attend a future Planning and Zoning meeting to discuss.
l'l :11llli 11 g ;111d /,o nin g Co 1rnnissi 1ll 1
1'11hli 1· I k:1ri11g
C::1s c //1/,0N20I2-00 7 S:1 11d C rt'.ck l'UD , #ZON2012-008 W H In vestm ent PUD
N<,vcm hn 20 , 2 01 2
V. ATTORNEY'S CHOICE
la]
Ms. Re id had nothing further to r eport.
VI. STAFF'S CHOICE
~
Di1·ector White provided an upd ate on futur e lll ee tings.
VII. COMMISSIONER'S CHOICE
[fl
Mr. Roth stated he hated to vo te down something that w ill ultilllately be a big plus for th e
City; the proposal ju st was n't well enough developed.
Mr. Bleile stated h e hated voting n o too on a proj ect that will ultilllately happe n . He
thanked the appli ca nt and everyone w ho attend ed. H e asked the applicant not to think
toni g ht's decision was a rejection .
Mr. Freelllire stated it was ve ry difficult to watch what he watched this evening. In this case
yo u have industri al today right n ex t to single family residential; that isn't going to change.
•
Th e question is , what gives you th e grea ter prob ab ility of illlprov ement in the future for the •
li ves of th e citize ns and also h elps the co mmercial or industrial property owner to
acco rnplish their goa ls and also a llows us the opportun ity to 171o ve forward and be able to
lllove clo se r to the City's long-t e m1 goals. You can't say no and then say yes to the
applicant. H e suggested th e Co mlllission t ake a good serious look at this and create an
environment whereby we ca n be a community that would b e res ponsive and receptiv e to
ideas that maybe requi1·e something a little bit different than what was done before. If this
was putting lipstick on a n otherwise industrial property to enab le it to sell or to position it
to sell, then what we've done is we've d elay ed that proc ess .
The rn eeting adjourned at 9:52 p.m.
•
•
•
•
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF CASE #ZON2012-008 )
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS )
AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO REZONE )
THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS 3001 SOUTH )
GALAPAGO STREET ET. AL. FROM 1-1 AND )
R-2-B ZONE DISTRICTS TO PLANNED UNIT )
DEVELOPMENT (PUD) )
INITIATED BY:
Baseline Corporation
700 12 th Street, Suite 220
Golden, Colorado 80401
)
)
)
)
)
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF THE
CITY PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION
Comm i ss ion Members Prese nt:
Commission Members Absent:
Brick, Bleile, Knoth, Fi sh, Roth, Welker, Townley, Kinton
Kin g
This matter was heard before the City Planning and Zoning Commission on Nove mb er 20,
2012 in the City Council Chambers of th e Englewood Civic Center .
Testimon y was rece ived from Staff, from the applicant and from area residents . The
Commission received notice of Public Hearing, Certification of Posting, Staff Report and
supplemental information from Staff, wh ich we re incorporated into and m ade a part of the
record of the Public Hearing.
After co nsiderin g statements of the witnesses, and reviewing the pertinent documents, the
memb ers of th e City Planning and Zoning Commission made the following Findings and
Conclusions.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THAT the request to rezone th e property known as 3001 South Galapago Street
from 1-1 to Planned Unit D evelop ment was filed by Baseline Corporation o n
September 27, 2012.
2. THAT the app licant submitted two applications, Sand Cre ek PUD (refe rred to as the
north property) and W H In vestme nts PUD (refe rred to as th e south property).
3. THAT Publi c Notice of the Public Hearing was given by publication in the
Englewood H erald on Nove mber 2, 2012 and was on the City's website from
October 26, 2012 through November 20, 2012 .
1
4. THAT Public Notice of the Public H ea ring was lll ail ed to own e rs and occupants of
property w it hin ·1 ,000 feet o f the su bj ect property.
5. THAT th e property was posted as r equir ed, said posting setting forth th e date, ti Ille,
and pla ce of the Public H earing.
6. THAT Planner l<irk t es tifi ed th e req u est is for app rova l to rezo n e th e pmperty frolll 1-
1 an d R-2-B Zone Di st ri cts to Plann ed Unit Deve lop lll e nt. Ms. l<irk t es tifi ed to the
n ite ri a the Colllmissi o n mu st co n sid er wh en rev iew in g a rezo ning application. Ms.
!<irk f urth er testified th at Sta ff reco llllll e n ds approva l of th e W H Investment PUD
Distri c t Plan with the following conditions:
• Final site plan approval will h app e n at a later date and will need to
rece iv e Planning and Zoning approva l and C ity Council approval,
• Delete "attached townhom e u se" from Cl a of th e PUD District Plan
Deve lop m ent Standards .
7. THAT the property is located ad jac e nt t o th e RTD Li ght Rail lin e between
Dartlllouth and Bates .
8. THAT the area is a rnixture of indu strial u ses, single and lllulti-fa mil y h o u sin g as we ll
as non-c onfo rlllin g res id e nti al units in th e industrial districts .
9. THAT the prop e rt y is 6.12 anes and Win slow Construction Company has occ upi ed
the so uth ern parcel sin ce 1954.
10. THAT th e parcel has been zoned industri al sin ce the first zo ning was put in place in
Englewood in 1940.
11. THAT the applicant is proposing rezoning to a PUD to includ e res idential uses.
12. THAT the proposed PUD zoning would make th e prop e rty more desirable for
dev e lopm en t.
13. THAT pr elimin ary pl an s of the proposed W H Investments PUD was referred to Tri-
County H ea lth, the Co lorado D epa rtment of Transportation (CDOT)i RTD, Xce l
Energy and BNSF Railroad for review and c o mment.
14. THAT the W H Inv es tments PUD was reviewed by the City's Developm e nt Review
Team (ORT) on November 13, 2012.
15. THAT the maximum dw elling units p er acre are proposed to be set at 45; the total
ma x imum dwellings would be 270.
16. THAT pursuant to the PUD procedure, the applicant conducted a neighborhood
m ee ting on July 18, 2012 .
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
17. THAT notice of the neighborhood meeting was mailed to property owners and
occupants of property within 1000 feet of the site.
18. THAT testimony was received from the applicant team .
19. THAT testimony was received from residents regarding the proposed
redevelopment of the site. Concerns were voiced about safety on Elati Street, traffic,
impact on community, and the proposed Bates Street Light Rail Station.
20. THAT the application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
21. THAT the application meets the Housing Goals and Objectives of Roadmap
Engle w ood: 2003 Englewood Comprehensive Plan.
22. THAT the application is not consistent with adopted and generally accepted
standards of development in the City.
23. THAT the application is not consistent with the goals, objectives, design guidelines,
policies and other ordinances, laws, or requirements of the City.
24. THAT the resulting rezoned property will have a significant negative impact on
those properties surrounding the rezoned area and that the general public health,
safety and welfare of the community are protected.
CONCLUSIONS
1. THAT the application was filed b y Baseline Corporation seeking approval to rezone
the property from 1-1 and R-2-B Zone Districts to Planned Unit Development.
2. THAT proper notification of the date, time, and place of the Public Hearing was
given by publication in the official City newspaper, and by posting of the property
for the required length of time.
3. THAT all testimony received from staff members, applicant team members, and the
general public has been made part of the record of the Public Hearing.
4. THAT the application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
5. THAT the application is not consistent with adopted and generally accepted
standards of development in the City.
6. THAT the application is not consistent with the goals, o bjectives, design guidelines,
policies and other ordinances, la w s, or requirements of the City .
3
7. THAT res i de nti a l use ca nn ot be dev eloped under th e ex ist ing zoning; the proposed
JJUD zo nin g would fll ake the prop e rty more desirable for development.
n. THAT the res ulting rezo n ed property will have a significant negative impact on
those properties surrounding the rezon ed a rea and that the ge neral publi c h ea lth,
s;:i f e ty and we lfar e of th e CO l71171Ullity are pr o t ec ted.
9. THAT the D ev e lopme nt Rev i ew Teafll rev iewe d th e site plan and deterfllin e cl that a
sub sta ntial amount of th e proposa l fll ee ts estab lish e d City d eve lop171e nt sta nd a rds,
h oweve r ther e a re unr eso lved issues. Sta ff will continue to work w ith the app li c;:i nt
Lo reso lve th ese i ss u es.
·10. THAT the PUD zoning desi gnati on is ap propriate for the area if the Bates Street
Light Rail Station is built; if not, density is too hi gh.
11. THAT the Commission is very co nc ern ed abo ut mixing res id enti al u se w ith in dustrial
us e.
12. THAT th e Co mmission does not agree with the applicant's request to remove th e
Planning and Zon in g Comfll iss ion and C ity Council from Public Hea rin gs to r ev i ew
Site Pl an.
13. THAT ther e are too fllany unresolved issues with the cu rr ent app li catio n.
DECISION
THEREFORE, it is the decision of the City Planning and Zoning Commission that the
app lication fil ed by Baseline Corporation to rezo ne the property known as 3001 South
Galapago St ree t from 1-1 and R-2-B Zone Districts to Planned Unit Development not be
reco fllm end ed to City Coun c il fo r app ro va l.
Th e decisio 11 was reac hed upon a vote on a motion m ade at the 171eeting of the City
Planning and Zo n i ng Commi ss ion on November 20, 2012, by Mr. Welker, seconded by
Mr. Bleile, which fllotion states:
TO INCORPORATE THE DISCUSSION FROM CASE #ZO N2 01 2-007 I NTO
THI S CAS E. THAT CASE #ZON2012-008, W H INVESTMENT PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT BE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL
WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FOR ADOPTION WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
4
•
•
•
•
•
•
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
•
•
Brick, Knoth
Final site plan approval will happen at a later date and
will need to receive Planning and Zoning approval and
City Council approval, and
Delete "and attached town home use" from CJ a of the
PUD District Plan Development Standards.
Fish, Roth, Welker, To wn l ey, Bleile, Kinton
None
l<ing
Th e motion failed.
These Findings and Conclusions are effective as of the meeting on November 20, 2012.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
5