The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2016-09-19 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet/ ~Englewood 1000 Englewood Pkwy -Council Chambers Englewood, CO 8011 O 1. Call to Order. 2. Invocation. 3. Pledge of Allegiance. 4. Roll Call. 5. Consideration of Minutes of Previous Session. AGENDA Regular City Council Meeting Monday, Sept. 19, 2016 •7:30 p.m. a. Minutes from the Regular City Council Meeting of Sept. 6, 2016. 6. Recognition of Scheduled Public Comment. The deadline to sign up to speak for Scheduled Publ ic Comment is Wednesday, prior to the meeting, through the City Manager's Office. Only those who meet the deadline can speak in this section. (This is an opportunity for the public to address City Council. There is an expectation that the presentation will be conducted in a respectful manner. Council may ask questions for clarification, but there will not be any dialogue. Please limit your presentation to five minutes.) a. Cheryl Mohan-Athey, Englewood resident, will address Council regarding her home at 3115 S. Acoma Street. b. Robert Ellstrom, Englewood resident, will address Council regarding administrative issues within the City. c. Joe Anderson, Englewood resident, will address Council regarding the neighborhood rehabilitation project. d. Scott Gorsky, Englewood resident, will address Council regarding Citizens for Englewood Schools. e. Duan Tucker, Englewood resident, will address Council regarding Citizens for Englewood Schools . f. Coween Dickerson, Englewood resident, will address Council regarding communications. Please note: If you have a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the Oty of Englewood (303-762-2405 ) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed. g. Christine McGroarty, Budget Advisory Committee, will address Council regarding the 2017 proposed budget. h. Kathleen Bailey, Englewood resident, will address Council regarding the Allen Water Plant residuals. 7. Recognition of Unscheduled Public Comment. Speakers must sign up for Unscheduled Public Comment at the beginning of the meeting . (Th is is an opportunity for the public to address City Council. There is an expectation that the presentation will be conducted in a respectful manner. Counc il may ask questions for clarification , but there will not be any dialogue . Please limi t your presentation to three minutes. Time for unscheduled public comment may be lim ited to 45 minutes, and if limi ted, shall be continued to General Discussion.) Council Response to Public Comment. 8. Communications, Proclamations, and Appointments. a. A proclamation declaring October 2016 as Conflict Resolution Month. 9. Consent Agenda Items a. Approval of Ordinances on First Reading. b. Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading. i. Council Bill 29 -Approve the Sand Creek PUD Amendment allowing single family and multi-family residential and the Iron Works Village Site Plan. Staff: Planner II Audra Kirk c. Resolutions and Motions. 10. Public Hearing Items a. A Public Hearing to gather input on the proposed 2017 City of Englewood Budget. (Please note: A copy of the proposed 2017 City of Englewood Budget is avai lable for review on the City's website http ://w ww .e ngl ewoodgov.org/b ud get and at the Englewood Public Library during regular business hours). 11. Ordinances, Resolutions and Motions. a. Approval of Ordinances on First Reading. b. Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading. c. Resolutions and Motions . i. Public Works staff recommends Council approve a resolution supporting Englewood Mclellan Reservoir Foundation's agreement with the Colorado Department of Transportation granting COOT six permanent easements and one Please note: If you ha ve a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the Oty of E:ngl1ewc>od I (303-762-2405 ) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed. \. temporary construction easement for $260,000. Staff: EMRF Board Member Dave Henderson 12. General Discussion. a. Mayor's Choice. i. Executive Session to receive legal advice regarding the case of Brockhausen v. City of Englewood pursuant to C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(b). b. Council Members' Choice. 13. City Manager's Report. a. Future City Council meeting schedule . b. Underwriter RFP. 14. City Attorney's Report. a. Discussion of ACLU letter regarding begging ordinance. 15. Adjournment. Please note: If you have a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City of Englewood (303-762-2405 ) at least 48 hour~ in advance of when services are needed. Coween Dickerson 2835 S. Pennsylvania Communication regarding the bond issue , is very misleading. There are too many unknowns and far too many inconsistencies in the process and interpretation and actions of Mile High. For example, at a recent town hall mtg , Mile hi insisted it was not doing any marketing yet did nothing but marketing and admitted they would not get the 15k unless Council put the bond issue on the ballot and they did "legal work", yet Britz was and is marketing, including apparently directing staff to write a self serving front page article in the recently published "citizen" I am appalled at this article, rife with illogic, inconsistencies, emotional rhetoric , and outright lies and the iteration of the bulk of the non factual FACT SHEET that came out on Saturday. There is little fact to it or the original article. 1, For example, I have been assured by police that private citizens can NOT get personal info through license plate numbers, so that is NOT a valid supportable or logical conclusion or reason for secure parking. I have asked several police officers what their concern is and the answer is not license plate pictures but being followed home by disaffected arrestees . 2 , Why is the opening paragraph talking about the wider array of criminals and crime now that could not be anticipated in the 70's.? a.All those crimes were extant and just as wide an array then and now. Nothing new but the approved higher density has exacerbated low level crime which was noted by the police 3yrs ago in the public record. b."proliferation" of weapons (what does that mean, that criminal gun activity has increased , even though there is NO such indication in the crime stats?) as though that is a valid relevant reason to indebt the City. The number of households in the country that have guns has DECREASED from 47% to 43%, so "proliferation" is not the problem. And, police have confirmed many times that violent crime is almost non existent in Englewood and gun crimes are few . Yes the bldg is not properly maintained and needs work but indebtedness to the tune of 27mill is not the way to go when there are cheaper ways of fixing the problem of the bldg that do not subject the police to 2 more yrs of what is asserted as untenable conditions. The current entire public safety force is 109-111 which translates to 240thousand per employee. That is obscene and unjustified. The biggest problem is buried in the article under the UNTRUE Council reasons for approving the bond issue , the alleged "need" for "national certification". The police may want all the military toys and federal funding-I admit the attraction , but they are our employees and this is dangerous to the community and the whole concept of trust , respect, excellence and community policing . The perceived and actual problems with policing are inherent in the system. When a centralized organization claims a monopoly of force within a given geographical area, the results will always lead to civil rights violations and inconsistent enforcement and mutual disrespect and intimidation of law abiding citizens. The police force in general had been advancing in mutual respect and community involvement but between this article's lies and propaganda and the FACT SHEET without FACTS, just repeat of propaganda, and my most recent negative encounters with officers, I am losing respect and support for policing in general. Add to that: 1. the apparent politicalization of the police leading to discriminatory enforcement esp against a small group of peaceful now law abiding citizens who have paid for their offenses, and NOT against 2x felons disturbing the peace of neighborhoods, 2. failure or refusal or direction NOT to enforce state laws and City ordinances 3. failure to enforce ordinances and laws consistently 4. intimidation of law abiding citizens who complain/notify as directed by officers do not credibility, trust and respect encourage. The 27 mill Edifice Rex will only hurt, not help. Retract both publications and pull the bond issue from the ballot. Void the contract with Mile High and find a more cost effective alternative to EDIFICE REX. PUBLIC COMMENT ROSTER AGENDA ITEM 7 UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENT September 19 , 2016 Speakers must sign up for Unscheduled Public Comment at the beginning of the meeting. Please limit your presentation to three minutes PLEASE PRINT NAME ADDRESS TOPIC "$~L/ ~ ~ 15-roh;/fvv,_,J' , Pt--~( tu~b;r+e.,-~t/7 '7? b/k/lf2r ??~Pc? ~JP~~ &d>ac -bRiA D /3CZDCKHAleC£N t/e10 ,s vu>< o/. 06<.:D;µA->JU '?>'/ ,t>P"10REA N\AAlrdlvl 32.6S S. t,JAs./+;r.JGT?JAJ (1. ~t , DA. t-J o M A,.v 'Io-J I I f 1 1 I I 1 ' 1 l ~e)es-fr;~,ti. 5·&\..~4'j ~;~:-~t;=~ ~~!~~&-~~ ~ AGENDA ITEM 7 UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENT Speakers must sign up for Unscheduled Public Comment at the beginning of the meeting. Please limit your presentation to three minutes PLEASE PRINT NAME ADDRESS TOPIC • PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, conflict resolution encompasses mediation, arbitration, facilitation, collaborative decision-making, restorative processes, and other responses to differences; and WHEREAS, the conflict resolution processes empowers individuals, families, communities, organizations, and businesses to foster communication and devise solutions that are acceptable to the needs and interests of all parties involved; and WHEREAS, conflict resolution is taught and practiced by citizens in many school systems, universities, and graduate programs throughout Colorado and the world as a way of solving disputes; and WHEREAS, community-based programs fairly and equitably resolve neighborhood and community conflicts, thereby strengthening local relationships; and WHEREAS, professional associations of conflict mediators promote peaceful and creative resolutions to disputes . NOW THEREFORE, I, Joe Jefferson, Mayor of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby • proclaim October 2016, as • CONFLICT RESOLUTION MONTH in the City of Englewood, Colorado. I urge all of our residents to join together to support this effort. GIVEN under my hand and seal this 19th day of September, 2016. Joe Jefferson, Mayor • COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: Ordinance approving the Sand September 19 , 2016 9bi Creek PUD Amendment and Iron Works Site Plan-2nd Reading INITIATED BY: STAFF SOURCE : Audra L. Kirk, Planner 11 Community Development PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION Council approved the Sand Creek Planned Unit Development (PUD) District on February 4 , 2013 . Council approved the Sand Creek Planned Unit Development Amendment and Iron Works Site Plan on first reading on August 15 , 2016 , and Public Hearing on September 6, 2016. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends that Council approve , by ordinance, on second reading , the Sand Creek Planned Unit Development Amendment and Iron Works Site Plan . BACKGROUND The Sand Creek PUD parcel is 10.55 acres and was formerly occupied by the General Iron Works • (GIW). Regional Transportation District (RTD) acquired the northern portion of the GIW parcel for its maintenance facility in 2002 . Sand Creek acquired the southern portion of the GIW parcel in 2010. These parcels have been zoned industrial since zoning was first adopted in 1940. • The PUD is a rezoning process that establishes specific zoning and site planning criteria to meet the needs of a specific development proposal that may not be accommodated within existing zoning development regulations. A PUD rezoning provides the opportunity for unified development control for multiple properties or multiple uses and is composed to two major elements : a District Plan and a Site Plan . The District Plan provides the regulatory framework with in which development may occur and the Site Plan provides for the spatial distribution of land uses within the proposed development. The Sand Creek PUD District Plan incorporated the Permitted Principal Uses of the original underlying 1-2 General Industrial District with the addition of multi-family residential uses . It further stipulated that site plan approval for industrial , office or retail uses may be processed administratively, whereas , residential development must have the site plan reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. PUD OVERVIEW The Sand Creek PUD Amendment is proposing the following: 1. Single Family Detached House Lot Lot Size : 26' X 72' Typical Maximum Lot Coverage (Including Covered Porches and Garages) 60% Building Height: 42' Maximum Maximum Front Setback to Covered Porch : 4' Minimum Front Setback to Principal Building : 8' Minimum Side Setback to Covered Porch On Side Street: 4' Minimum Side Setback To Principal Building On Side Street: 8' Minimum Side Setback: Rear Setback : Setback at Side to Rear Transition Curve (at alley intersections) 2. Duplex Lot Lot Size: 46' X 72'Typical , 51' X 72' On Street Corner 3' Minimum 4' Minimum 3' Minimum Maximum Lot Coverage (Including Covered Porches and Garages) 80% Building Height: 42' Maximum Front Setback to Covered Porch: 4' Minimum Front Setback to Principal Building : 8' Minimum Side Setback to Covered Porch on Side Street: 4' Minimum Side Setback to Principal Building on Side Street 8' Minimum Side Setback : O' or 3' Minimum Rear Setback : 4' Minimum Setback at Side to Rear Transition Curve 3' Minimum (at alley intersections) 3. Townhome Lot Lot Size: 20'x45' or 16'x45' Typical , 30'x45' on Street Corner Maximum Lot Coverage (Including Covered Porches and Garages) 85% Building Height 42' Maximum Front Setback to Covered Porch : 4' Minimum Front Setback to Principal Building : 6' Minimum Side Setback to Covered Porch on Side Street: 4' Minimum Side Setback to Principal Building on Side Street: 8' Minimum Side Setback : O' or 3' Minimum Rear Setback: 4' Minimum Setback at Side to Rear Transition Curve 3' Minimum (at alley intersections) 4. Condominiums Lot Size : Varies Maximum Lot Coverage (Including Covered Porches and Garages) 60% Building Height: 55' Maximum Front Setback to Covered Porch at Street: 4' Minimum Front Setback to Principal Building at Street: 12' Minimum Side and Rear Setback at Alley: 3' Minimum Side and Rear Setback: 1 O' Minimum 5. Parking The current Unified Development Code (UDC) requires 1.5 parking spaces per unit, plus 1 guest space per 5 units . The proposed development would require 232 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing a total of 313 parking spaces . Of the 313 parking spaces, 64 spaces are on-street parking. The UDC does not allow on street parking to be counted toward the required parking, however, the streets within the Sand Creek PUD Amendment are private streets, and therefore will count toward total parking required. However, if the on street parking was not included, the total number of provided spaces would be 249, which would exceed the amount currently required by the UDC. 2 .. • • • • • • 6. Landscaping The UDC has different landscaping requirements based on the project type. A single family or multi-unit dwellings (2 to 4 units) requires 40% landscaping . A multi-unit project with more than 4 units requires 25% landscaping. Due to the scope and variety of types of housing, (single family , multi-family) it is difficult to compare the proposed landscaping to the required landscaping under the current UDC . However, as outlined in the table below, the applicant is proposing to provide landscaping that is closer to the single family (40%) requirement than to the multi-family (25%) requirement. Required trees Required shrubs One unit dwelling or Multi-unit dwelling (2 236 1475 to 4 units) 40% Multi-unit dwelling (more than 4 units) 147 922 25% Proposed minimum landscaping 235 1000 7. Public Land Dedication: The park fee in-lieu fee for the development will be $52,435 .00 FINANCIAL IMPACT The Sand Creek PUD Amendment and Iron Works Village Site Plan will generate building permit, use tax and park fee-in-lieu revenue as well as new property tax . LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Bill for Ordinance 3 • • • ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 2016 BY AUTHORITY COUNCIL BILL NO . 29 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ------- A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SAND CREEK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT NO. 1, AND THE IR.ON WORKS VILLAGE SITE PLAN. WHEREAS, the City of Englewood City Council approved the Sand Creek Planned Unit Development (PUD) with the passage of Ordinance No . 5 Series of 2012/2013 , which required that prior to any residential development a site plan for the residential development would need approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Englewood City Council; and WHEREAS, the City of Englewood City Council approved the Foundry Site Plan of the Sand Creek Planned Unit Development (PUD) located on the South East Portion of the Sand Creek PUD with the passage of Ordinance No. 2 , Series of 2015 /2016; and WHEREAS, BLVD Builders filed an application for an amendment to the 2012/2013 Planned Unit Development to allow single family residential units in addition to the already approved multi- family residential units; and WHEREAS , this Amendment No. 1, would allow single family residential units in addition to the already approved multi-family residential units; and WHEREAS, pursuant to 16-2-8(1)(1) E.M.C., major modifications to a P.U.D . District plan must be approved pursuant to the same limitations and requirements by which such Plan was originally approved; and WHEREAS, the Englewood Planning and Zoning Commission held a Public Hearing on July 16, 2016, reviewed the Amendment of the Planned Unit Development and recommended approval of this Sand Creek Planned Unit Development Amendment No. 1 -and Iron Works Village Site Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. The City of Englewood City Council has reviewed Amendment No. 1 -and Iron Works Village Site Plan to the Sand Creek Planned Unit Development and pursuant to 16-2-8(1)(1) E.M.C. finds that the Planned Unit Development (P .U.D.) Amendment No. 1 is in conformance with the approved Planned Unit Development requirements . 1 Section 2. The Englewood City Council finds that all required documents, drawings, referrals, recommendations and approvals have been received. Section 3 . The Englewood City Council finds that the amended P.U.D . and site plan is consistent with adopted and generally accepted standards of development within the City. Section 4. The amended P.U .D. site plan is substantially consistent with the goals, objectives and policies and/or any other ordinance, law or requirement of the City. Section 5. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby approves Amendment No. 1 to the Planned Unit Development for the Sand Creek -and the Iron Works Village Site Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit A. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 15th day of August, 2016. Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City's official newspaper on the 18th day of August, 2016 . Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City's official website beginning on the 17th day of August, 2016 for thirty (30) days. A Public Hearing was held on September 6, 2016. Read by title and passed on final reading on the 19th day of September, 2016. Published by title in the City's official newspaper as Ordinance No._, Series of 2016, on the 22nd day of September, 2016. Published by title on the City's official website beginning on the 21st day of September, 2016 for thirty (30) days. Joe Jefferson, Mayor ATTEST: Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No ._, Series of 2016. Loucrishia A. Ellis 2 • • • • • • !.I :=~~: t ~ ::: ~ ! f ~' I ~: I § "' ! l ~ " ~ i ~ ~ 21 " " i SAND CREEK PUD AMENDMENT -JRON WORKS VILLAGE LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 341 TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 1, GENERAL IRON WORKS SUSOIVTSJON FILING NO. 2, LOCATED IN THE NORTI-MEST QUARTER OF THE NORTtMEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34 , TOVVNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 68 'NEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL. MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECOROEO MARCH 28, 2016 AT RECEPTION NO. 06030247, COUNTY Of ARAPAHOE, STA"TC OF COLORADO PROJECT BACKGROUND lHE SUBJECT PROPERTV IS COMPOSED OF ONE PARCEL. LOCATED EAST OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAIUlOAD, NORTH Of WEST BATES AVENUE AND WEST OF EAST ELATI STREET. THE FOUNDRY APARTMENTS ARE ON AH ADJACENT PARCEL TO 'TliE SOUTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE TOTAL AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 8,47 ACRES, OR 369,089 SQ, Ff. Tl4E SITE. WHIOi fS CURRENTLY OWNED BY SANO CREEK INVESTORS, llC, IS CURRENTLY ZONED PUD PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE SAND CREEK PUD, WHICH WM APPROVED BY THE CITY Of ENGLEWOOD ON MAY 9, 2013. THE SANO CREEK PUO AllOWS FOR 1-2 USES AND ADDED MULTl-FAMILY USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT ARE APPAOPRJAT[ AND CONFORMING TO THE SURROUNDING USES IN THE AREA. THE srrE HAS BEEN ClEANEO UP DUE TO HISTORIC IRON WORKS ACTIVITIES ON THE PROPERTY. AOOITIONALClEANUP Will OCCUR A5 PART Of TiiE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED JN THlS PUD AMENDMENT. lHE PUD AMENDMENT WIU. INTRODUC£ ZONING ANO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THATWllL AUOW FOR AND PERMIT SINGLE FAMILY ANO DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, IN ADDITION TO REFINING THE EXISTING STANDARDS FOR MULTI-fAMILY USES ANO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT APPLICATION Will BE PROCESSED PURSUANT TO THE APPLICABLE CITY REGULATIONS. PUp DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY ~ 1 w~~ !" 0 ,., r )> ! ~ ~ ~ "' ,., VI :-< I I !" " VI )> r .., )> 0 .., x )> " VI 0 :-< VI :-< VICINITY NAP ( NOT TO SCALE ) THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO DEVELOP 136 FOR-SAU RESIDENTIAL UNrTS IN THE FORM OF CONOOMIN1UMS, TOWNHOMES, DUPLEXES AND SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. PARKING SHALL BE MOSTLY PROVIDED IN GARAGES ATIACHED TO THE HOMES . VEHIClE AND BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED BASED ON THE ST AN DAROS IN THIS PUO AMENDMENT, BUT GENERAU.Y EXCEED THOSE PROVIDED IN THE EXlS'i!NG PUD'S PROPOSED MULTI-fAMILY PLAN. SEVERAL COURTYARD/AMENITY AREAS ARE :~~:.:::iRPURATI!> INTO ";1-1£ LiESIG 1'\ ttiAn\iEJ.. \~~'JOE W~i.._:.;...~t~;.;. ENGLEWOOD 'S 2003 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOGNIZES THE PROPERTY AS THE LOCATION FOR FUTURE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE 2003 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EMPHASlZES THE REVITALIZATION, REDEVELOPMENT ANO REINVENTION OF ENGLEWOOD, All OF WHICH ARE ACCOMPLlSHED THROUGH THIS PUC AMENDMENT. THE SJTE IS IDENTIFIED IN THE COMPREHENSM PLAN AS AN AREA OF CHANGE WITH A MIX Of RESIDENTIAL USES CONTEMPLATED . THIS PUO AMENDMENT FURTHERS THE GOALS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY PROVIDING FOR-SALE MEDIUM OENSrTY HOUSING THE FORM OF CONDOMINIUMS, TOWNHOMES AND HIGHER-DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTlAL ~ --;:•!:~ ':'l'."''.~r ~; ·.·.:.;s:n ... ::·-:.-::-:!. ts GOVERNED BY THE ORIGINAL SANO CREEK PUD. ADOPTED 5/14/2013 AND RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 03059798, BOOK NO . 433 AND PAGE NO . 61 ~ TMIS PUO AMENDMENT ALSO CONFORMS TO THE ENGtEWOOO LIGHT RAIL CORRIDOR PLAN ADOPTED IN JUNE 2013. THE LIGHT fWL CORRIDOR PLAN CONTEMPLATES DENSITIES WITH THE 8ATES-OTY NEIGHBORHOOD NORTH AREA &£TWEEN 15 AND 35 UNfTS PER ACRE AND PARKING AT A RATE OF 1- 1.15 SPACES PER UNIT. TliE PLAN_ ALSO ENCOURAGES A GRID OF PUBLIC STREETS RATHER THAN PRIVATE DRIVES AND A MIX OF UNITS TO INCORPORATE RENTAL AND HOMEOWNERSHIP OPPORTUNmES. THE OVERALL DENSITY wru. BE APPROXIMATELY 16 UNITS PER ACRE, WHICH FALLS WITHIN THE DENSmES CONTEMPLATED &Y THE C:OMPREHENSM PLAN . THIS PROJECT" WILL REVITALIZE EXISTING RETAIL IN ENGLEWOOD CITY CENTIR AND THE BROADWAY CORRIDOR, AND GENERATE TAX REVENUE THAT Will BENEFIT THE SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CTTY OF ENGLEWOOD. PUD PLAN NOTES 1. THIS PROPERTY DOES NOT LlE wmllN A 100-YEAR ROOD-PLAIN . 2. All NEW IJTIUTIES ASSOOATEO WITH THIS PROJEO SHAU BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. 3. All CONCRETE WORK DONE IN THE PUBllC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALl BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND CONCRETE SPEOFICATIONS FOR THE aTY Of ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO. 4. ANY NEW FIR£ HYDRANTS SHAU BE TO THE C1TY OF ENGLEWOOD REQUIREMENTS. 5. SUBDIVISION OFTliE SrTE SHAU. BE COMPLETED UNDER SEPARATE DOCUMENT. 6. THE DEVELOPER SHAU. COMP\.Y WITH All APPLICABLE OTY CODES, REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS NOT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED WITH THIS PUO . 7. IN THE EVENT OF A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE SPECIFIC: PROVISIONS OF THIS PUD ANO TITLE 16, THE SPEOFIC PROVISIONS OF THIS PUO SHALL CONTROL PLAT 0£TENT10N P<>ND NOTES A) THE STORM WATER DETENTION AREA(SJ SHOWN HEREON SHAU. BE CONSlltUCTtO AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, HEtRS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS. IN lHE EVENT THAT SAID CONSTRUCTlON AND MAlm'ENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE OT'Y OF ENGLEWOOD SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER SUOI AREA{S) ANO PERFORM THE NECESSARY WORK., TME COST OF WHlot SAID OWNER, HEIRS, SUC:CE.SSDRS, AND ASSIGNS AGRaS TO PA'f UPON BIWNG. FIRE ACCESS NOTE THE REQUIRED FIRE ACCESSES SHOWN WITHIN THIS PUC>-SITT PLAN CONFORM TO THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AMENDED 2012 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE WHfCH REQUIRES A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 26-FEET. THE CITY MAY ADOPT A NEWER VERSION OF THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE THAT WOULD AU.OW A NARROWER FIRE ACCESS . IF SO ADOPTED, TliE QTY OF ENGLEWOOD SHAU. ALLOW THE NARROWER FIRE ACCESS WIDTHS UNDER THIS PUO ANO THts CHANGE TO THE srrE PLAN WIU BE APPROVED ADMINISTRATMLY. THE OWNER/DEVELOPER Will BE REQUIRED TO SUBMrT AND OBTAIN APPROVAL OF THE MINOR SUBDIVlSION AND SITE CONSTRUcnON PLANS TO ACCURATELY DEPICT THE FIRE ACCESS WIDTHS. INDUSTRIAL USES MAY SUNSET PROJECT TEAM DEVELOPER: BLVD BUILDERS, LLC P.0.BOX8'25 DENVER, CO 80201 ATTN : AARON FOY 303-995-4421 ARCHITECT-CONDOMINIUMS: KEPHART 2555 WALNUT ST. DENVER, COLORADO B020S ATTN: DOUG VAN LERBERGHE 303-832-4474 W. YALE IA VENUE W. AMHEI ST AVE . !" !" n VI VI Cll I )> )> CD "' z "' "' z n 0 0 0 " 0 ;:: )> () 0 ,., " )> ::e "' (/) VI )> VI -< :-< :-< :-< 1 ~. BATES AVE DEVELOPMENT wrrHIN THIS AREA IS GOVERNED BY THIS PUD AMENDMENT : IRON WORKS VILLAGE ARCHITECT -SINGLE FAMILY/DUPLEX/TOWNHOMES: PEL-ONA 4676 BROADWAY BOULDER, COLORADO 80304 ATTN : KORKUT ONAf\AN 303-443-7876 SURVEYOR ANO ENGINEER: MANHARD CONSULTING, LTD . 8008 E. ARAPAHOE COURT, sum: 110 CENTENNlAl. COLORADO 80112 ATTN: KEVIN BARNEY 303-531-3207 6) NO Bl.ALDING Oii: STRUCTURE WIU BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE omNTION AREA(S) AND NO OiANGES OR AllAllOWED INDUSTRIAL USES SHALL CEASE AND SHAU NOT BE GRAND FATHERED NOR CONSIDERED lfGli.L., NO~CONFORMING USES UPON THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) FOR ANY RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL US£ WITHIN THE PUO, WHETHER OR NOT THE PROPERTY WTfHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PUO HAS BEEN PLAmD. LAND PLANNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT : ALTERATIONS AffECTlNGTl-IE HYDRAULIC: OiARACTDlSTIC:S Of THE DEttNllON AREA(S) WIU BE MADE WITHOllTTHE. APPROVAL CF THE PUB UC WORKS DIRECTOR. PEL-ONA 4676 BROADWAY BOULDER. COlOR.AOO 80304 ATTN : KORICUT ONARAN 303-443-7876 INDEX OF SHEETS SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE 1 COVERSHEO 2 DISTRICT PLAN 3 EXtsTING ZONING AND lAND USE • PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN ~ PRELIMINARY UTIUTY PLAN ' PRELIMINARY GRADING ANO DRAINAGE PLAN 7 LANDSCAPE PLAN • ARCHITECTURAL. EllVATIONS • AACHITECTURAl ELEVATIONS PROPERTY OWNER SANO CREEK INVESTORS, llC, A COLO RA.DO LIMITED UABIUTY COMPANY I BY: STATt OF COLORADO I ISS C:OUNTYOF ___ I THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WM ACKNOWLEOG£0 BEFORE ME THIS __ DAY OF , 2016 BY . FOR SAND CREEK INVESTORS, U.C WITNESS MY HAND ANO SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRfS : ----- ADDRESS APPROVED FOR THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMM ISSION CHAIRPERSON ~ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORDING SECRETARY ~ MAYOR OF ENGLEWOOD om-- THE FOREGO ING INSTRUMENT WM ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THlS __ DAY Of , 2016 av _________ _ CTTYCLERK CLERK & RECORDER'S OFFICE THS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IS ACCEPT£0 FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE ctERkAND RECORDER OF ARAPAHOE COUNTY, STAT£ OF COLORADo AT ___ O'Cl.OCK _.M . ONTHlS __ DAY OF , 2016 RECEPTION NO. , BOOK NO. ---PAGE NO(S). --- BY: _________ _ BY: _________ _ ClERK ANO RECORDER DEPUTY s Iii Ii ii~ II § r i I ~1i1 ""l ... 0 1H Vt-.ci;; &....JiH auiH .c ~iH I-"~. C ..JHi ..... :::t:•,g .. cn~h VzJt~ %0~~~ ~Jol!J w CJ :3 ...I > ~ H• !.!~ .g~ !~8 ; I a: I i ~ z 0 a: 1-z w :!!: 0 z w :!!: ct 0 :::::> a. lil:: w w a: (.) 0 z ct VI 0 0 ct a: 9 0 (.) 0 0 0 3: w ...I CJ z w 1-w w :c VI a: w ~ (.) . :11•11G.1.llllM: -'-"--I "'°""-DC.:~ i ~ I I • ' --ft~ Dlll'I;~ SHEET 1. ~ 9 BBLENC001 E x H I 8 I T A • • • SAND CREEK PUD AMENDMENT IRON WORKS VILLAGE PUD DISTRICT PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A . GENERAL REGULATIONS: UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR IN THE SAND CREEK PUD, OR THIS AMENDMENT, THE PROVISIONS, STANDARDS, REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES PERTINENT TO AN APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAND WITHIN THIS PUD ZONE DISTRICT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE (1-2) ZONE DISTRICT AND THE BELOW LISTED STANDARDS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY USE, DUPLEX, TOWNHOME, AND MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. B . PERMITTED USES: THE FOLLOWING USES ARE PERMITIED IN ADDITION TO THOSE USES ALLOWED UNDER THE SAND CREEK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED, THE FOLLOWING USE CATEGORIES ANO TYPES SHALL HAVE THE SAME MEANINGS AS SUCH CATEGORY AND USE TERMS BY THE SAME NAMES CONTAINED IN TITLE 16 OF THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE. RESIDENTIAL USES: SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOUSE, LIVE /WORK, DUPLEX TOWNHOME, MULTI-DWELLING UNIT, CONDOMINIUM C. DENSITY ANO PARKING OVEAALL DENSITY: THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS SHALL NOT EXCEED 165 WITHIN THE GENERAL IRONWORKS SUBDIVISION, FILING NO 3 PUD. RESIDENTIAL UNIT DIVERSITY: EACH OF THE SINGLE-FAMILY, DUPLEX, TOWNHOME, AND MUL Tl-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNIT TYPES, SHALL BE REPRESENTED ON THE SITE PLAN IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THEN 10% OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS. PARKING REQUIREMENT PER LOT TYPE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED AND DUPLEX UNITS: 2 SPACES MINIMUM PER UNIT REGULAR TOWNHOMES (AT LEAST 65% OF THE ROW HOMES): 2 SPACES MINIMUM PER UNIT SMALL TOWNHOMES (AT MOST 35% OF THE TOWNHOMES): 1 SPACE MINIMUM PER UNIT CONDOMINIUMS: 1.5 SPACES MINIMUM PER UNIT D. THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE SAND CREEK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SHALL CONTINUE TO APPLY FOR ALL USES, EXCEPT THOSE DESCRIBED IN THE FIRST AMENDMENT. THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SHALL BE APPLIED AS LISTED PER EACH RESIDENTIAL LOT TYPES AND FOLLOW THESE GENERAL PROVISIONS: BULK REGULATIONS AND LOT TYPES: ALL SETBACKS, HEIGHT AND LOT COVERAGE REGULATIONS SHALL BE APPLIED AS LISTED PER EACH LOT TYPE FOLLOWING THESE GENERAL PROVISIONS: 1. FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE: THE DISTANCE FROM THE BUILDING FACE TO ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: A . TO THE CLOSEST INTERIOR LOT LINE; OR B. TO THE CENTERLINE OF A STREET, AN ALLEY OR PUBLIC WAY; OR C. TO AN IMAGINARY LINE BETWEEN TWO BUILDINGS ON THE LOT THE DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED AT A RIGHT ANGLE FROM THE FACE OF THE WALL. 2. PROJECTIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH 2012 IRC TABLE R.302 .1 (2) EXTERIOR WALL RATING, PROJECTIONS AND OPENINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH 2012 IRC TABLE R302.1 (1) LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO PUD DISTRICT PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS {continued) SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOUSE LOT LOT SIZE: 26 ' X 72 'TYPICAL MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE (INCLUDING COVERED PORCHES AND GARAGES) 60% BUILDING HEIGHT: 42' MAXIMUM FRONT SETBACK TO COVERED PORCH: 4' MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK TO PRINCIPAL BUILDING: 8' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK TO COVERED PORCH ON SIDE STREET: 4' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK TO PRINCIPAL BUILDING ON SIDE STREET: 8' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK: 3' MINIMUM REAR SETBACK: 4' MINIMUM SETBACK AT SIDE TO REAR TRANSITION CURVE (AT ALLEY INTERSECTIONS) 3' Mlt.fiMUM DUPLEX LOT LOT SIZE: 46 'X 72' TYPICAL, 51' X 72' ON STREET CORNER MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE (INCLUDING COVERED PORCHES AND GARAGES) 80% BUILDING HEIGHT: 42' MAXIMUM FRONT SETBACK TO COVERED PORCH: 4' MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK TO PRINCIPAL BUILDING: 8' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK TO COVERED PORCH ON SIDE STREET: 4' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK TO PRINCIPAL BUILDING ON SIDE STREET: 8' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK: O' OR 3' MINIMUM REAR SETBACK: 4' MINIMUM SETBACK AT SIDE TO REAR TRANSITION CURVE (AT ALLEY INTERSECTIONS) 3' MINIMUM TOWNHOME LOT LOT SIZE: 20'X45' OR 16'X45' TYPICAL, 30'X45' ON STREET CORNER MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE (INCLUDING COVERED PORCHES AND GARAGES) BUILDING HEIGHT: FRONT SETBACK TO COVERED PORCH: FRONT SETBACK TO PRINCIPAL BUILDING: SIDE SETBACK TO COVERED PORCH ON SIDE STREET: 85% 42'MAXIMUM 4'MINIMUM 6'MINIMUM 4'MINIMUM PUD DISTRICT PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS {continued) TOWNHOME LOT (continued) SIDE SETBACK TO PRINCIPAL BUILDING ON SIDE STREET: 8' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK: O' OR 3' MINIMUM REAR SETBACK: . 4' MINIMUM SETBACK AT SIDE TO REAR TRANSITION CURVE (AT ALLEY INTERSECTIONS) 3' MINIMUM CONDOMINIUMS LOT SIZE: VARIES MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE (INCLUDING COVERED PORCHES AND GARAGES) BUILDING HEIGHT: FRONT SETBACK TO COVERED PORCH AT STREET: FRONT SETBACK TO PRINCIPAL BUILDING AT STREET: SIDE AND REAR SETBACK AT ALLEY: SIDE AND REAR SETBACK: E. ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS: 60% 55'MAXIMUM 4'MINIMUM 12' MINIMUM 3'MINIMUM 10'MINIMUM IN GENERAL, MASSING, ARTICULATION, SCALING, ANO FACADE TREATMENTS SHOULD AIM AT ACHIEVING A HARMONIOUS ANO DIVERSE ENSEMBLE OF BUILDINGS WITH NO SINGULAR BUILDING DEMANDING TOO MUCH ATIENTION. THE FOLLOWING ARE DETAILED GUIDELINES FOR VARIOUS BUILDING TYPES. SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED AND DUPLEX BUILDINGS ARTICULATION : EXCESSIVE ARTICULATION SHOULD BE AVOIDED . USE OF TWO OR THREE ARTICULATIONS IS PROPER (FORWARD FACING GABLES, DORMERS, BAY WINDOWS, PORCHES, ETC. ARE AMONG COMMON ARTICULATIONS). PORCHES AND SCALE: PORCHES AND SINGLE STORY ELEMENTS SHOULD BE EMPHASIZED. A MINIMUM OF 20% TRANSPARENCY IS REQUIRED ON THE FRONT FACADES -TRANSPARENCY IS MEASURED ALONG A HORIZONTAL LINE AT THE EYE-LEVEL WHICH IS 5' HEIGHT MEAsURED FROM THE GROUND FLOOR FINISHED LEVEL. A MINIMUM OF 60 S .F. OF COVERED FRONT PORCH SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH DWELLING UNIT. MATERIAL: AVOID USING TOO MANY DIFFERENT MATERIALS; SIMPLICITY SHOULD BE THE VIRTUE. CLUTTER SHOULD BE AVOIDED. COLOR: INTENSE, BRIGHT, OR FLUORESCENT COLORS AND GLARE. SHALL BE AVOIDED AS THE PREDOMINANT COLOR ON ANY WALL, OR ROOF OF ANY STRUCTURE.CHANGE COLOR ONLY ON INNER CORNERS; CHANGE OF COLORS ON OUTER CORNERS SHOULD BE AVOIDED. TOWN HOMES AR Tl CU LA TION: BUILDING WIDE COMPOSITION IS ENCOURAGED. ARTICULATION PER UNIT SHOULD BE MINIMIZED. MIRRORING THE UNITS AND TWO UNIT GABLES THAT BREAK THE LENGTH ARE ENCOURAGED. EDGE UNITS SHOULD BE DIFFERENTIATED. PORCHES AND SCALE: BUILDINGS SHOULD RELATE TO PEDESTRIAN . DIFFERENTIATION IN FACADES OF GROUND FLOORS AND UPPERMOST FLOORS IS ENCOURAGED. A MINIMUM OF 20% TRANSPARENCY IS REQUIRED ON THE FRONT FACADES -TRANSPARENCY IS MEASURED ALONG A HORIZONTAL LINE AT THE EYE-LEVEL WHICH IS 5' HEIGHT MEASURED FROM THE GROUND FLOOR FINISHED LEVEL. A MINIMUM OF 50 S.F. OF COVERED FRONT PORCH SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH DWELLING UNIT. MATERIAL: AVOID USING TOO MANY DIFFERENT MATERIALS; SIMPLICITY SHOULD BE THE VIRTUE. CLUTTER SHOULD BE AVOIDED. PUD DISTRICT PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS {continued) COLOR: INTENSE, BRIG~IT. OR FLUORESCENT COLORS AND GLARE. SHALL BE AVOIDED AS THE PREDOMINANT COLOR ON ANY WALL, OR ROOF OF ANY STRUCTURE. CHANGE IN COLORS SHOULD EMPHASIZE EITHER THE INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS, OR INDIVIDUAL ELEMENTS OF THE MASSING TO SCALE DOWN THE BUILDING AND TO RELATE TO THE PEDESTRIAN SCALE. CONDOMINIUM BUILDINGS FOR CONDOMINIUM BUILDINGS, PLEASE REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS LISTED IN THE ORIGINAL SAND CREEK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2012 F . DEFINITIONS SIDE YARD USE EASEMENTS SIDE YARD USE EASEMENTS ARE HEREBY GRANTED ALONG COMMON SIDE LOT LINES WITHIN ALL DETACHED HOME LOTS AND DUPLEX LOTS AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT. SIDE YARD USE EASEMENTS OCCUR FROM FRONT PROPERTY LINE TO REAR PROPERTY LINE AND EXTJ:ND FROM THE GRANTOR'S BUILDING FOUNDATION TO THE LOT LINE BETWEEN THE GRANTOR'S AND GRANTEE'S PARCELS THAT SHALL BE GRANTED TO THE EASEMENT GRANTEE PER THE RESTRICTIONS OUTLINED BELOW. REFER TO THE FINAL PLAT FOR A GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE SIDE YARD USE EASEMENT. THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS APPLY TO THE SIDE YARD USE EASEMENTS: a. EASEMENT GRANTEE SHALL HAVE FULL ACCESS AND ENJOYMENT OF THE EASEMENT INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS, USE AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SPACE INCLUDED IN THE EASEMENT. FENCES AND WALLS USED AS PRIVACY SCREENS MAY NOT ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT AND REAR SETBACK. IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DECKS, PATIOS, WALLS, LANDSCAPING, FENCES RAILS, FURNITURE AND OTHER SIMILAR ELEMENTS ARE PERMITIED WITHIN THE DEFINED SIDE YARD USE EASEMENT. DECKS, PATIOS AND WALLS, OTHER THAN PRIVACY SCREENS, IN EXCESS OF 30-INCHES IN HEIGHT (AS MEASURED FROM FINISHED GRADE) ARE NOT PERMITIED IN SIDE YARD USE EASEMENTS. ONLY LANDSCAPING, HARDSCAPE, AND IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS ARE PERMITTED WITHIN FRONT AND REAR SETBACKS. SIDE YARD USE EASEMENT PROCEDURES AND POLICIES SHALL BE MANAGED BY THE IRON WORKS VILLAGE METROPOLITAN DISTRICT. NO IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE DETRIMENT OF THE GRANTOR'S ABILITY TO MAINTAIN THEIR HOME. b . SIDE YARD USE EASEMENTS ARE PERMITTED ON DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY AND SPECIFIED DUPLEX LOTS ONLY. c. ALL IMPROVEMENTS BY GRANTEE LOCATED WITHIN THE SIDE YARD USE EASEMENT SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE EASEMENT GRANTEE. d . EASEMENT GRANTOR IS ENSURED OF ACCESS WITHIN THIS EASEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE LOCATED ON THE EASEMENT GRANTOR'S LOT AND FOR NO OTHER PURPOSE. THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITIEE OF THE IRON WORKS VILLAGE METROPOLITAN DISTRICT APPROVES ALL PLOT PLANS BEFORE AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD FOR ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. FOR ISSUE RESOLUTION THE IRON WORKS VILLAGE METROPOLITAN DISTRICT IS GRANTED ACCESS INTO THIS EASEMENT. e. ALL PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES, INCLUDING GARAGES, OWNED BY EASEMENT GRANTOR SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY EASEMENT GRANTOR. f. GRANTEE SHALL NOT ALTER FINISHED GRADE AND/OR DRAINAGE PATIERNS ON THE GRANTOR'S PROPERTY WITHOUT THE WRITIEN APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITIEE. NOTES: EASEMENT GRANTOR: THE LOT OWNER GRANTING SIDE YARD AREA TO ADJACENT LOT OWNER FOR USE. EASEMENT GRANTEE: THE LOT OWNER GAINING SIDE YARD AREA FROM ADJACENT LOT OWNER FOR USE. i -···----·-···· 1 .. 1 I I I I I I I I I w ~ ...I > l/J ~ a: 0 3: z 0 !!: I I-z w ::iE Q z w ::! < Q :::> a.. ~ w w a: 0 Q z < l/J .9 ~ .!!i io i! u ::. ..: .... c !! . " ~~ fl ~ ... ct .c ... . e.&,..c cz~~ ··~ i. c ID A. 0 . ..!.;!"! ... 0 A. ..... 0 Q < a: 0 z ...I :3 0 0 a.. Q I- 0 0 a: 0 I- ~ l/J 2i ...I CJ z w i ,JHW.-.: __m_. ~ "'91W.AUOC.:_<_o __ e _.., ___gL..._ i M .. ~ 12~9 • "'-------' • • • ! 5 ! ] ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SAND CREEK PUD AMENDMENT IRON WORKS VILLAGE I , , LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO I ~\•1 111: '-I I . I 1::1 'r--'7 ~--1 : ,' :.'5300 .::C.'--' ~.:,~> : I I I: ihi : "' / · -IL_ ~~ru lo!: ZONING: H GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DlSTRICT \ I , ----i! ~ ~ g I I I : '·r ', ------J_ '. ---, --; ~ 1 LANO USE : WAREHOUSE/STORAGE -?, c ~ ~ ~ m 1 ""'~ I I JJ.> I :!!o9e! I "f'"/ L_ ,Z~ :: I ,---Ti~i~' ~If I I I Z~:ii I ~e / PROPERTYLINE -~~ a> ~ -a [ 1 1 a"" 1 ' ---------' -------........... I I ,' : I I ,' : I / i v ,I I! ,'I I ~ I I / I #-1 ·: ~.., \ .. L _!..__, J ~B .· . . ~ .II) .. · :. . ~ ,. ....... -I . .., I , .. _ ZONING· H LIGKT INDUSTRIAL DfSTRICT 0 c,.,p> --:_L_ _ - LAND USE : VACANT UNPlAITED ~ ;' ...., a · ~ .; ;:; "' 0 It ~ z ~ .; I I 0: C) ' ...:..<"· ~ m ~ ~ /§ I ~ / / . ~Id' ~~-2~N~1~~H-T ------ "" ·· . tNOUSTRIAL DISTRtCT ~ ~1 .:· :• LANO U~E~ST~~W~~ ·-------- , . I II ~ I .. , • ZONING: H LIGHT ti I -~ LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL I ! ! I s"<>s_ .. I ' I \ ZONING: PU0-10 PLANNED UNIT OEVflOPMENf LAND USE : VACANf INDUSTRIAL LOTS / / ./· s.Jo.,,. ,-PROPERTY LINE -· I INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT lll ~~-----~ ,-----__ ___, , ~f ~ 111~ I I · \ I l.,,. ., \ I 1 ___ \\ ___ 1 'Oo'ROW " . i i i I~ :1: , : :----+-: n '• 1 ~I \ / / 1:0" I ~~ ~ '\1'1 !;;; ~3~i ~~ : ~----~~~!: '' ·11 ~~ I I ~.:;1~/ i in . ~~ i~~~ '·11 1 -•1 ,,! ~09!:: tl ~ IJ I CCJ I L------~ ~1 ,1 ~ 11,jl ~~ I 1 0~~~1 ~ ZONING : H UGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ,........... / \AND USE: WAREHOUSE/STORAGE ~ ,l ,...! / ·1 Ii ,.,# zoN1NG: PlJ[)..10 PLANNED UNrT DEVELOPMENT LANO USE: VACANT INDUSTRIAL LOTS {DEVELOPMENT ON THIS PARC£l ts GOVERNED BY THE ORIGINALSAN,D CREEK PUO) t1r aj jlf----~;-1 I ~~~ I I d 1~ 1 r---T1 I ----I -(-1 I --1---- I j ~: L~ / / j ,---1--1 ~I ~II / I L---I __ __, r ru 1 1 +-· l··l ,1,l...__j _ ----_, L__ --t------' -I I . ~ I I I I / B _.,. o; • til ili I : :----r-----: I / / 1/ /r •.·. . .-PROPERTY LINE 1 • ,_,;,: ~'t1 11 1 / 11 F ··5300 ·; -----t11 I . , J L J L ___________ / :~~~~c:~:-~:~ :;~:~~~;:---~::--::~-~~-----:~_J ~-I \ I I ZONING ·~1UGlfT H\ I I : ZONING : WH INVESTMENT, INC. --•• LANO USE : INDUSTRIAL UNPLATIED . PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ·; '1 /: ZONING: WH INVESTMENT, INC. --I I PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT . I LANO USE: INDUSTRIAL UN PLATTED ·,; I I I I \ I \, I Ii I I ' I •. I I INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT \ I I ONING : R·2·B MEDIUM DENSITY L. I \ I I \ I I LAND USE : RESIDENTIAL I '· I fs1NGLEANDMULTI-DWELUNG I ) 1---.-------1 1----------I L._ _J \ UNrT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT • I . . I I I ,..; I ) I I ------I • ~-L ---------1 ~NQ ~~DEN!I~ / ~ I \L I I : "'I , I I ~ ~ I I 1 r , __ j:: I • , "' it' -----~ ~ZONING:HLIGHJ~ I .1 I I ·f < 1--. --~ ~--------! o CUSTlllA[l)5'fR1cr x 1 · iil _ . I (!I ' -ZONING : H LIGHT -.. LANO USE· AUTO SERVfCf 0 .' ; ZONIN G. R·2-M OIUM DENSITY - oC INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT } • t U.. r' 1 1 1 1 / I ui I SINGLE AND: MW.Tl·DWEUING l A. LANO USE : RESIDENTIAL .i I : ' u; . I I I l :' I I UNIT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT \ I ~ 1 i 1 --1 ~--zoNING :HUGHT --} 1 r--rl· r-_____ ~N9us: RFDENTI!':_ __ + ---1 < 1--_;._j 1-------lll/SJRW.llJSllllCT. ---\ Cl I ------( I I LAND USE: WAREHOUSING ' . '6 · .. t I I I 1' I I l I I : : 1 : ~ ZONlrul l~Hr ~ i ZONING HUGlfT i i !I i i \ i I -----I r----_ j ~ 1 INOUSTRIALOISTRICT 1 L____l~~Sl.B!AJ...01ST.!UCI ...... _J I I ~ ------~ i-----., l \ j.ANO USE : WAREHOUSE/STORAGE 1 LANO USE : RESIDENTIAL 1 f I f I I I I : 1 I I I ~---------, \ ! 1 03060 U0 SCALE: 1"=60' l llill .::~ §@:! ... C!B Vi-tU s..~:•1 g!.c • n a~£ .., "'&a• J! I.. t .c ~~H L-~~· . r-s •! C ..l{i~ :::> ~i~ a en Hi ~~IH ... t.UH ~)~~~ l~c 1•• ~lg ..iifj~ 138 w CJ :3 ..I s: ~ a: w 0 "' 3= 0 ::::> z c c 0 < z !!: a: s . g c I-0 z z 0 < w c~ CJ :!: c 0 z z 0 z w 3= 0 :!: w N < ..I CJ c CJ z ::> z j:: Q. w "' ::ii:: x w w w a: CJ c z < fl) ___ ,_ .. __ J'IG.l.AUCC.:2!!i._ -.....,:: _ll_W __ ...fill.!ill__ SHEET 3 OF 9 BBLENC001 • • • j 1 D 25 SO 100 SCALE : l "=50' I : I ft I ,,.~ I ~: >fS • I :;,/ ~ I ~~ I fir~ &!. . ;& I 1§! / I / -I I I PROP RETAINING WAll -/ .... W/6' HIGH SOUND 1 WALLONTOP 1 TOWNHOME --L BUILDING (TYP) 1 I I 3' CONC I WALK(TYP f ··. I I I I I I I I I I I ,EJ / SAND CREEK PUD AMENDMENT -IRON WORKS VILLAGE LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO I ' I 54'ROW SIGNAGE LEGEND IN5TAU "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" SIGN WrTH BREAk·AWAY SIG N POST NOTE : CURB HEAD ALONG BOTH SIDES OF AMHERST Pl.ACE SHAU.BE PAINTED RED rN ADDffiON TO TH E "NO PARKING FIRE LAN E" SIGNS PROP RETAINING WAll - W/6' HIGH SOUND WALL ON TOP PROPERTY LINE -..... 1!.0T ~ DCIE\!'V!Oll\!I TRANSPORATION/ -~J,·r -·~~]/ i: , • ~:: £ I 2:::::~A ]~u' UTILITI EASEMENT .. 11 • ! '1' 'I I ' ,-_ _..c=J~ RECEPTION • • I l(i I' =~\=::r----r::;::i1=========~======::i1=!J---=== NO. 84132494 ~ I u'. I -..; '\ .&-------------------i...;.;.,I ! •I i . '-6"VERTICAl I J ; ' • ... S' CONC. CURB & GUTIER (TYJ') ... PROP PAVEMENT -SURFACE PARKI NG (9'xll' TYPJCAL. STAU) i ! I SIDEWAU< (SEE CITY OFENGLEWOOD ll' ' ii u DETAIL E06) ,.--;~~~~~~ ----'. I_: TYPICAL PRIVATE ROAD CROSS SECTION I PoN:ROP -<'. ) .nt (SOUTH FOX STREET, WEST AMHER~\~~ENUE ANO WEST AMHERST PlACE} TRANSPORTATION A ,:· Jlri:-_ EASEMENT _.,~ // II PROP ERTY LINE GARAGE ~ •• 1' U 'PRIVATESTREETTRACT I •. I"' GARAGE ~~ ,# . ···· /! I" 20' EOA-EOA " I '-""""' -' . 3' #'. ~ / <_.,f I <:::::::::::::: i-=-/ ~ .. ~ =;;r -~-L ~~ .-·~""1' ------VAllfVPAN _,,. ....._PROP DRIVEWAY (TYP) •. 4-C .. ~ ..... ~PROP ,/ TRANSPOATATK>N ,........,_ EASEMENT ~rr---------1 r------- '~ : --;w TOWNHOME BUILDING ITYP) I ~ ;,l! ·1·11 ir ' I H·r -1l1i ~PROP CURB & GUTTER YI & S' DETACHED CONC . · t j SIDEWALK !I I PROP It~: 5' TRANSPORTATION 11 I. EASEMENT H·I !f)1 ;(i i l!\J I I I I I I TYPICAL 22' PRIVATE ALLEY CROSS SECTION N.1.::> 4' I 20' PRIVATE STREET TRACT I .. ~ GARAGE ~ • ll' EOA-EOA GARAGE r-3 · I ==--; ~ ~- · .. CONC. ·-PROP VALLEY PAN DRNEWAV (TYP) TYPICAL 20' PRIVATE ALLEY CROSS SECTION N .·,.~ 26 ' PRIVATE STREET TRACT .1.• Fn.6.£QA ,, GARAGE ~ • I 3' I ~ GARAGE ~ q ~ '· CONC. VAU£YPAN '-PROP ORIVEWAY llYP) TYPICAL 26' PRIVATE ALLEY CROSS SECTION N :1 . .;> ROWVAR/6 I 'ROP RETAINING WAU. -/ W/6~~:~ A,~--~·· 7 , -~ ---c-·-wrF--Zt ~~' i1')1 I .i ____ ti:' I I 1 •;:·~~~~I. __ T._l_-: ___ l~--_,-. __ : ___ --_-::--:------~---:-_ J..:::::::'::.,:::.'~ -~'.'.:-'._:...----------... -.:::-:-.---:-:::-.--··:--:-1·.:_r_-:J-..,-_._;----~-,--1 I . I I [ I Iii I ~ EXS IOEWALkTO fi'; 1 BE REMOVED I I ( ,. I / ·i. 15' WATER MAIN ~~~:1~~ PAGE 398 j !'. iJ !.· I .':<_,,.--PROPS' . t TRANSPORTATION EASEM ENT •t ,, Ii !1 'i'1 ! I 'II Ii II !i jl 1!) I! 1 1 U l~ ! 60' -~ l!BIL.CIC()( 3 J,, :I ii I I"~ 1ni 1[:~ lh l il1 1 i!1 1 IH 1 i\1 1 1Lj J J I I I I I I I I I I I I ;\ 11 1· 1 if{I' I I ·I:] t i .~ I iii I pt ________ J L _____ _ -d"l:'.J' . I l AU£Y 1 -~ '·. -~11'1 _____ ~~z~~,~~~~~-~-~1-:F--~~-=~=-~--... , ·:~------------------------ ----ACrus-lfYp)t ~~ ---~-t ---r q--'81/. 111 .!l"il'~ 61 '1¥~. '. ==i--_____ -·-__ .. .: /-=°~:..::'.E-=~~~~~~.::-=;:.;.~~ ~~f.-!.~fur:?i \ rt:-;;-_·~;;;;J~~~~tif'·-F=~~='..~~~--··-· · ··i----------: ,------ _.'"! i ""''!l l I &S'DETACHEDCONEfl :]; _ .. -id I I lal!.OCet 2 I : IE!!.OC()( 31 ' : ~ I I SIDEWALK t . . l I I I I I ' l!l!.CCct ~ I I I s .o. tx1 6l ·~·s .!llD>IDll TDO~ I ·. PROP 5' CONC EXa.J/181 Gtm'ER . -EX PA VEMENT EXCUR81 . SIO EWALK (TOREMAIN) GllTTfR TYPICAL EXISTING ROAD CROSS SECTION (SOUTH ELATI STREET NORTH OF PROP WEST AMHERST AVE} N.T.S f)(C!JNC SIDEWAa lill'RDW ~----------·-------·---j 8'r 44':tf -t l't :~~ , _,I r --------;;;;;;;;,,--lC I -'J '·-" ---W.-:: :.:..:::: .-.:::c-: =~: _--:::-_-: =-= =--= .::::-: :·::ir-D:=~.·---I I \ . -EX PAVEMEf{T EXCURB& -. EX CONC · PROPS' CONC -EX CURB & GUTTER fTO 8E GUTTEH SIDEWALK SIDEWALK REMOVED AND REPLAC£0) acoNC -' TYPICAL EXISTING ROAD CROSS SECTION s:/:~":::.::g (WEST BATES AVENUE & SOUTH ElATI STREET -SOUTH OF WEST AMHERST AVE) N.T.S OWE LLING UNITS : SINGLE FAM ILY DUPl.EXUNITS TOWNHOME UN ITS CONDOMINIU M UNITS TOTAL UN ITS SITE PLAN NOTES: 13 18 69 36 136 SITE PLAN INFORMATION PROVIDED PARKING : ATIACHEO DOUBlf CAR GARAGES ATIACHEO SINGLI CAR GARAGES CONDOM INtl.JM GARAGES OFF-STREET SPACES (ADJAClNTTO CONDQ,,,INIUMS) SUBTOTAL ON·STREET FOX AND AMHERST AVENUE TOTAL ON-STREET AND OFF·ST REET PAR KING PROV IDED 1. AU ROADWAY, ALLEYS ANO SIDEWA LKS ARE TO BE PR1VAT£LY OWNED ANO MAINTAINED. 2. AU PROPOSED CURB RAMPS SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. 160 SPACES 2.0SPACES 60SPACE5 9 SPACES 2.49 SPAW 64 SPACES 313 SPACES l 1111a: =r= i~·~ ... CH~ Vt-til &. ... iu • n~H W' "~. '·ll-.C Z ~H -~·~ I-~'. C ... t!j =»wr • cn~.i la: E Z ~c ~o/~ '-uifi ~,_bl r~m~8 w c:J :3 ..J > ~ a: 0 0 3= c z ~ 0 a: !!: 9 ' 0 lo-0 z w :E c z w :E ~ c ::::> Q. ~ w w a: 0 c z ~ Cl) l'IW:l.l.•llllL: _,_ .. __ IWM.6'aot ;~ D-.tt _ll_W __ ~ SHEET 4 OF 9 BBLENCODl • • • ! !!! 5 ~ " i ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ l!1 !. J 1 0 2S so 100 SCALE : 1 "=50' .. .. ~!I :! ~ :as~ 1 ""~ I :11 li;t I Ii I ; I i I ~ / I PROP RETAINING WALL -1- W/6' HIGH SOUND 1 . WAUONTOP / I i I I I I I ·; I BMWM . . . SAND CREEK PUD AMENDMENT IRON WORKS . VILLAGE LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST . QUARTER OF. THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 4SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO . . . . I I . ; . ..-PRlVAT£ DOMESTIC WATER ,,/ SERVSCE LINE TO BUILDING . PR.O~SEO BLOW..OFF LOT 1 IUtCIEL"VIOlllJ I ~ I EXISTING @ = 0 .'=" UTILITY LEGEND RCP STORM SEWER PVC STORM SEWER STORM MANHOl£ STORM INlET (CURB & GUTTER) . STORM INlET (LANDS<;APEI Cl!ANOUT P~OPOSEO @ II TRAN5PORAT10N1 -~:'·ll:lr.------~:I 1 : . UTIUTY EASEMENT. /~ j1 I .~E~~~4r;. ~1 ·11 ~I · .PUBLIC I ~ I 5.0'MAX &· :,......-·-)- FlAR£0 END SECTION SANrTARY MANHOLE • • =i ® TYPICAL BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY DETAIL PROP RETAINING WAil --..... W/6';~~~~ \ \ ----<-- '·· . . I I I ISHARGE TO EX CURB & GUTI"ER PROP POND -. I I VIA SIDEWAU: CHASE :""~ SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN GATE VALVE FIRE HYDRANT _STREET LIGHT -.-·--· .. ... OUTLET \ I /I I '-PR6:~~RE . II L, DETENTION Ji I POND-.. t.,~ ·,, ' Ii : . ,. //' ., . ~ ~::··.. !J i ~ a ""' ~ .. ~' '·, .. _,7 t1 ~ ~.-;>-' /-J/../._J,,ROP STORMWATER # .. ·: ·/ . ' , .," \PuMP VAULT ~,.·/'-"" ~ .. ~ [[] @I l!l .CURB AND GUITTR SIOEWALk ACCESSIBL£ aJRB RAMP PROPERTY LINE R.O.W. LINE EASEMENT LINE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT TEl£PHONE EQUIPMENT CHAIN-LINK FENCE L '~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~ ,.,.,coNNECTTO .. ~ ·~t~·,· . ~ / EX6"WM..# '· EX6"WU ~~~~'4·t~;E~=TO~-_L:~=~ '.-~-~ !~~~':11!.N~~--<- Q,' ! ··~ PROP FIRE . l ;; I. \ HYDRANT (TYPI 171 1, : u I ' EX4"WM . I ~ :l!' ' I t :l~ i I i! ;L!l l,l. i!{ ll Il l! I, 1~1, •' l'.i ll 11.'I " 11n ii 11:11 r ih ' :: u·:I p, 1f.!1 d'- '*"" UTILITY NOTES r~B~c.l~i.f.~~ f:E~~~RI c~~~fA.~sFINh't'~H RETAtNING WALL 1. AU. STORM SEWER MAINS, LATERALS, INLETS AND MANHOlfS ARE TO BE PAIVAffiY OWNED AND MAINTAINED. 2. BLOW-OFFS ON DEAD-END WATER MAJNS SHAU BE WrTiitN S-FEET OF A DOMESTIC WATER OR JRRICiATIONTAP ISEE DETAIL AT l£FT). 3 . 10 FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE IS REQU IRED BETWEEN WATER ANO SEWER SERVICES. . . . 38("" )i(" 4. 18 INCHES VERTICALCU:ARANCE l5 REQUIRED BETWEEN WATER ANO SANITARY SEWER CROSSINGS WITH SANrrARY SEWER BELOW WATER. S. PRIOR TO STARTING EXCAVATION FDR WATER, SEWER AND STORM SEWER LINES WORK A "PUBUC RIGHT OF WAY EXCAVATKlN " PERMrT SHAU BE OBTAINED FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. AU WORK SHAU BE PERFORMED BY A CITY LICENSED AND BONDED CONTRACTOft OBTAIN THE LICENSE THROUGH THE BUILDING DJVIStoN (303)762·2357. THE EXCAVATION BOND SHAU BE PROCESSED THROUGH THE PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT (303)762-2500. . 6. AS PER THE CfTY Of ENGl.EWOOO MUNICIPAL CODE ll·IS. lD, NO CONNECTION TO A CITY FIRE HYDRANT WIU BE ALLOWED UNTIL THE USER HAS OBTAINED A FIRE HYDRANT PERMrT FROM THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. . 7. EACH BUILDING SHAU. 8£ SERVID BY A SEPARATE WATER SERVICE ANDA SEPARATE SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION DIRECTLY TO THE NEAREST MAIN, WITHOUT CROSSING OTHER ADJO INING PROPERTIES AND WfTH SEPARATE CURB STOPS INVOLVING ONLY ONE ACCOUNT WHEN WATER IS TURNED ON DA Off. I . All CROSSINGS OF THE crrv OF ENGLEWOOD'S WATER' SANITARY AND STORM SEWER FACIUTIES MUST BE POTitOUD TO VIRIFY A MINIMUM OF s FEET HORIZONTAL ::tEP.":·.\rK.!:·ANQ.A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES VE!!.TICA.L ClEt .RANtE 8£TWEf.N TY.[ PROPOSED CONDU!r A~C."!"~E EXISTING UTil.fTIES. · >. Pl.EA5E CAU. FOR l/TIUTIES LOCATES THREE j3) DAYS IN ADVANCE Of DIGGING . EMERGENCY lOCAlt:S MUST B£ CAUED IN ON THE SAME DAY Of THE EXCAVATION AND VERIAED AS AN EMERGENCY BYTKE UTIUT/ES ~EPARTMENT PERSONNEL .. Pueuca• _....,,,,. WATER MAIN TYPICAL PRIVATE ROAD CROSS SECTION (F6X STREET, AMHERST AVENUE AND AMHERST PlACf.) N.T.S. U' PRIVAT'ESTORM ~-D SEWER 7' 0 S' ,,,... PUBLICr SAN SEWER Poo~,':,~~~so~~~-;,'_~·· ,.~ 1 vn:~1.l\MMt:11s1 r-L :Irr• !"WM !tit WAU.ONTOP \ C ~ w fl I I Iii I l'~i [~ bl -1;:11 r,~1 11 , 1•i1!111 ·11 :: • 11 i I ii If.I, TYPICAL 22 ' PRIVATE ALLEY CROSS SECTION ,._ ,,. GARAGE GARAGE ~ 4' 22 'PRIVAltSTilE£TTRACT 4' ~ I (~'WATER MAIN EASEMENT rp BOOk 817, PAGE 391 ! J ~ l l I r 1r:t; ,, :r·j) ;: ;,u 11 :1 ~ ~~ 11.n !, '"ii ,, lh ~-1f:i'I ,, 1rJ ll '.t .!1 1· ii i' l!R.OCet 3 1~--ifi J ~~-·tt r-EXlS.SANSEWER -j! i[•' ·rL 1i; I 1 [lcj, I I I I I I I I I I I I 8" PUBLIC SANITARY ~LWER MAIN 4 " PRIVATE SAN SERVICE ITYPI / I " PUBLIC WATER MAIN . . .. l · %"PRIVATE WATER SERVICE (TYP) TYPICAL SERVICE CONNECTIONS SINGl£ FAMILY HOMES ' 8" PUBUC WATER MAIN j ~ r I ; I ' l . r· ![·!1 ll il !!'.1 ii !:!lt JL . , , • , , : , , , : E?, e:r; I !cb; , , , 1 1 1 , , , , , r , , ' 1 , Q ' ! y 1 ~ -f _______ _ -~ ... ------· ... -~~-----~~~-•t~~; /-g'~."!~TO / · EXJl"SANSEWETI 1119. 110.TIES &YIE .'°" .~. . EX!iiJ"ST ->~ ·-. -, _ Ui> --·-··-·· -· .,,_ .. , LF;~~~~~ ~~~),.!~,~~~;;;?£~'~~~~~:!',-~-~__:_-_~__:_-_~--~ : S.G. IXIA\lll.iL !llll'S ~IIDQWi"lll>I\! EX66"ST ---I -' .~-(XJ5"SANSEWE/t : : IEll!.@Cet 2 I : I IEIR.OCct 31: I I I t · · .... %"PRIVATE WATER SERVICE {TYP) 4" PRIVATE SAN SERVICE (TYP) TYPICAL SERVICE CONNECTIONS TOWNHOMES SERVla CONNECTION NOT£: ANY PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SERVICES THAT Will BE L.;}CATEO UNDER A PROPOSED BUILDING SHALl 8£ SCHEDULE 40 PVC . ABS MATERIAL JS NOT AUOWED FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICES . ~ I 20'EOA-EOA ~ I ===-=i I = I . . f::::'.:::::== ..0 I~ I " I "~ PUBLIC&" _./",, ,.--PUBLIC s• WATER MAIN / SAN SEWER 0 TYPICAL 20' PRIVATE ALLEY CROSS SECTION N.T.S. GARAGE ~ 4' 20' PRIVAT'EsrREETTRACT I •• ~GARAGE . . I lB'EOA-EOA I =< l=I >= ~-u· I 35· I PUBLICS"-·· I WATER MAIN .·-PUBLIC 8" SAN SEWER a· TYPICAL 26' PRIVATE ALLEY CROSS SECTION N .•. GARAGE ~ 26' PRIVATE STREET TRACT ,;%; GARAGE ~ 4 ' EOA-EOA __,__ 4' _ ~ "'I I --t--::::; l::::::::::::i II~ I 7.S' l 11' I 75' I _,....'° I PUBLIC s~ --· _,.,.-PUBLIC B" WATE R MAIN . SAN SEWER 0 = llal~! l11~gl UI 56 HI QQ ~= -~ ~~§ ... O~H V t-t!l s..~i'i gi .. • U ~H .... ,l! Li-.c z~u --·j I-~~. C ~H~ "-"" i5j :>~~.I: • cnhl :f"'E Z·H %0!~~ -~~ UH: . !J: i ~]fH .. g, 1~8 w ~ :3 .J > ~ a: 0 z 3: :3 z Q. 0 ~ 5 . :J I-j:: z :::> w ~ == 0 ct z z w SE == :J < w 0 a: :::> Q. Q. ~ w w a: 0 0 ~ ui ___ ,_,, __ l"'MM.Auce:~ oiu.nrr. _>L_W __ -ililli!L__ SHEET 5 OF 9 BBLENCOOl • • • j ii J! ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 0 25 50 100 SCALE; l "=50' I ~ I ~ I /:' I )> ,! I ~! I Ii;/« I "l ~ I Ill:~ lk ; I 1§/ ~ I @!I l I ~; PROP RETAINING WAU W/6' HIGH SOUND / WAUONTOP 1 ·.·· .. PROP SW DETENTION & WATE R QUAUTY PONO VOLUME REQ'D::0.34 AC-Ff HWl=5301.5 TOP OF 8ERM=5303 .S BOTIOM=S2 96.5 Q l«I RELEASE=2.82CFS I RETAININGWAU(TYP) ~!l I I I I I I I I SAND CREEK PUD AMENDMENT -IRON WORKS VILLAGE LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO PROP NE DffiNTION & I : I !.CV 1 IE:ll C~TOO &><I WATERQUAUTYPOND ~ 1 r.-- VOl UME REQ'D..0.57 AC-FT !1 1 1' ' HWL-5295.D lf I I GRADING AND DRAINAGE LEGEND PROP RETAINING WAU W/6' HIGH SOUND WAU.ONTOI' TOP OF BERM:5297.0 PROP POND' 111 11 BOTTOM=5291.0 OUTLET 'I I --------~ .. RELEASE:4 .17CfS STRUCT\JRE I I ' I I ~~~~~~~~~~~ii-ii~~ml DlSHARGETO EXCVRB 'II &GLITTERVIA \ u SIDEWALK CHAS£ " ,:: •• :. J.. \ J : 1\1 ... ·~I ,J ;1 •• ,,,~/ .d. . PROP STORMWATER PUMP VAULT ~~~~~~~~1~; ~,~·· ~·~,~~~:~ ~~,.-,;:~ L _____ _ ,' ,,/ \ ,.. ,., "~'""""'--'C.~~·~·~ '["J?. .. I $ II ~~',ri1·{f ________ ! r------- , ' I :11 / !.~ I I I !~1 : ~ !~,, )---w. ) 1 1 rn 1 '.{l 'JI r :J' \ I I)·~ I f I} : l[.t 1 11·11 I I ,\!Il l l~E-02· ~~1 ,.U~<'."u-wi 1_ 1;t'J: -~:v :\ 1tt I /~ \~~ mil it iii I I I I I &~5 l-11 1\1 I !M I .I 'I \11 : gj 1.1 111 1 l".i ,, I ~. I[~ /\ II. I I 't~ ~~1DlDitEWlll.m!~~; ( lr ~ ' .,~ ~I I iii I i :I i1'1\: I If !1 lmll.OCct 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I Ii !li 1' I I ~ ~: : II ~ IL! I I I II !It EXISTING ~ = 0 ·21 -::---)- ----- GRADING NOTE : "" 1;'1 ~ ,., _.,-5301-- " --5301 ___ ... ;~, ~ ~§) [II d '' .... RCI> STORM SEWER PVC STORM SEWER STORM MANHOLE STORM INLET (CUR& & GUTTER! STORM INLET (lANDSCAPE) CLEANOUT FlARED END SECTION DIRECTION OF FLOW W/GllADE OIRECTIOH OF FLOW DRAINAGE BAS IN BOUNDARY DRAINAGE SUB-llASIN (SEE TABLE BELOW FOR SUB-BASIN ~FORMATION) SANrTAkY MANHOl.£ SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN GATE VALVE FIRE HYDRANT STREET LIGHT GRADE BREAK flfVATION SPOT EUVATION SUMMrT LOW POINT MAJOR CONTOURS MINOR CONTOURS CUR& AND GumR SIDEWALK ACCESS IBLE CURB RAMP PROPERTY UN£ R.O.W.UNE EA.SEMENTllNE i.UCT RiU.l EQ:.;WMENl TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT CHAJ N·llNK FENCE DECIDUOUS TREE WITH TRUNK DIA. IN INCHES (TBA) c~~1im9~5J~·Hr~~H RETAINING WAU. SINGU FAMILY AND DUPLEX LOB SHOW OVERLOT GJIAOING CONTOURS TO ACCOMMODATE FOR BASEMENT SPOllS. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS WU BE PROVIDED WITH DETAILED GRADING PLAN FOR EACH LDT. DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN SUMMARY SutrBasln A""' tmpervJous '.4 c, C111 Q, ltacres' lcfsl NE-01 0.40 83 % 0.77 0.88 1 .41 NE-02 0 .15 69 % 0.67 0.82 0 .44 NE-03 0 .41 80% 0 .75 0 .87 1.36 NE-04 0.1 8 69% 0.66 0.82 0.54 NE-05 0.04 57 % 0.58 0.76 0.09 NE-06 0.13 95 % 0.87 0.94 0.52 NE-07 0.13 94 % 0.86 0.93 0.50 NE-08 0.48 73% 0.70 0 .84 1.39 NE-09 0.54 77% 0.72 0.85 1.76 NE-10 0.07 32% 0.39 0 .65 0.11 NE-11 0.14 57% 0 .58 0.76 0.37 NE-12 0.36 90% 0.82 0 .91 1.34 NE-13 0.33 74 % 0.70 0.84 1.00 NE-14 0.83 51 % 0.53 0.73 1.99 SW-01 0.18 39% 0 .44 0.68 0.35 SW-02 0.05 50% 0.53 0.73 0.12 5W-03 0.19 49% 0.52 0 .73 0.45 SW-04 0.14 92% 0.84 0.92 0.55 5W-05 0.02 40% 0.45 0.68 0 .03 5W-06 0.12 83% 0.77 0.88 0.42 5W-07 0 .65 68% 0 .66 0.81 1.97 5W-08 0.21 60% 0.60 0.78 0.58 SW-09 0.29 46% 0.50 0.71 0.65 PROPOSED l!il Ill • • <:! ~ INE-011 ® --<----·--.. .... __..-5302.8 GB __..-5302.a --5303.0HP --5302.0LP Q,,. lcfsl 3.10 1.03 3.02 1.28 0.24 1.08 1.05 3.2 1 3.99 0.35 0 .95 2.86 2 .30 5.30 1.03 0.32 1.22 1.17 0.09 0 .93 4.67 1.45 1.81 ,.--530J-- _.-5102- Ci ~· ~" II ' f~ I ~~~~~~=~~~~=~;=~~~~~h ~/\~ .. :&l:.:.: JL J } -------------- \ ---~"'""'", ,, ......... 5W-10 0.48 89% 0 .81 0 .91 1.79 3.83 5W -1 1 0.4 9 49% 0.52 0.73 1.04 2.81 0 5-01 0.32 44 % 0.48 0.70 0.70 1.97 05-02 0.33 66 % 0.65 0 .81 0.97 2.31 05-03 0.15 33% 0.40 0.65 0.28 0.87 05-04 0.11 8% 0.21 0 .54 0.1 0 0 .48 05-05 0 .29 86% 0.80 0 .90 1.00 2.17 05-0 6 0.40 61 % 0.61 0 .78 1.05 2.59 05-07 0.18 78% 0.74 0 .86 0.59 1.33 -~r --------1 1 ----- I I I I i!l!.OC:ct 3 I I 5 1111!1 11~ ~ H ee 55 ~~ oo n =1= i!S llllic~H V1-·1~ &.""id Ru~d .., ~ti& .CZ di -z·j 1-'E· a!; C ..J'h~ o!i. :::>~e~ Rcn~n .., lltE ~~)~ ..._oiji ~]hi •o!i~ !~8 w Cl s ..J z > s 0 ¥: Q. a: w 0 Cl ~ 0 < Q z < < a: a: 0 Q . ..J Q I-0 z z 0 < w :E c Cl Q 0 z z ~ 0 w < :E w a: < ..J Cl Q Cl > :::> z a: Q. w < z ¥: w :E w ::::i a: w 0 a: Q Q. z < 0 ___ ._ .. __ IHIO.l..M~~ DMWMft _JL_W __ ~ SHEET 6 OF 9 B8LENC001 • LANDSCAPEZON! UNDSCAl'£AllA01J'l'SIDESnttr AOW ~ TREE LAWNS wrT1llN JtOW -TOTAL MINrMUM ReQutRED LANDSCAPE QUANITnES: REQUIRED MINIMUM lANDSCAP! Alt.EA:: !fl,266S.Jt. ( % 2S OF THE TOTAL LOT AREA) MINIMUMlftJMB!I. OFnEES 147 (I Tl.EEPEJt.625 s.F.) MINIMUM NUMBEJt OF SHRUBS "' (J PD.1005.F.) • • SAND CREEK PUD AMENDMENT IRON WORKS VILLAGE % OF THE TOTAL D!SCU'TTON ARJ!A LDT AREA (36',06JS.F.) SOD, MULa1, SHllUB, PERENNIAL BBDS, RJVEll 1lOCK BEDS, PEBBU! GARDENS, 131,9595.1'. "" PUN't'BIS, BOUUJEU, srm RJRNlSBING SOD, PEUNNL\L BEDS. JUVEl.aoCX BEDS, PEBBL! G.uD!!NS, 14.,51SU. , .. SIIEFUONISHINO 146,$245.1. %<0 Pl.OPOSED LANDSCAPE QUANmlEI: PllOPOSl!DLAHDSCAP2.All&\: (" 40 or nm TOTAL LOT All.A) 1'4fi,52.-4S.l'. _,.,,, (/ PJ.OPOSEONUMllEl.OF1REl!S 211- ( I TREE. P!ll '25 SJI'.) Pl.OPOSBD NUMB!ll OF SHRUBS 1000 ( I TR.E! PEI. W S.F.) I l OJ ![ ~I ~ if :r I I I I I I [ I [ Jw.:=~~t~R ' I [ I I I I I I I I I I 1r v==---------------~ r=--------------- LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 50' fl: SD.!ET!'EDeSDIANUOHTS i' LED S11cet LIOI-,,_.. Sallair c...ueL (Prn.iltzD 6-t....t•---..... f"..! ltpttimn ril•.-a.r•cMncW -~-ISllYbc...,.tiiMlt.)'• difraeat~ Brip.n.• -f,JOI N--.iUamall. 12: STllET UGKT ON ELA.TI SDE2T i' PLANT LEGEND !YMllOl. MA.TURD SCllN11HCIWG SIZB 0 ....... -~.aa.u. ·~-ffi-· -·----- =~ .U:-._'Ull_,. 0 -&• -------8 -&· ,,_,...,...,....._._ --8 ,..,.. ... taM.CDINT.t.'~ --8-&·-----e =~ .-..~ G :::.:.----a..wc.t.· e ........ --..., .... 0 ,..,,. .. 11 MALUIV.-.... ' ........ G IJ.Ua.11 ACDT.U ....... ~ ... G ~. u-z:ra.11 OAT.....outa!D-GW.J...,. ·~-e -&· CUT.._.,..,......,_ ,,.,.. .... 8 »Vil.a ..,.._it.nlQL.\TA U·WlllA. @) ... &. PftVJC.t.Uaf.QM.~ u.1r11CA. 8 IS..11.a PllNllCZMIW~' ........ ® lt.W ... ,,.,,.lllA. COMMON NAMll S1Z2 QTY. ...,.. ___ ,._T, 1\aDlm .. _,.UICVST,~ ._ ........ -UCl.couaAllOll.W ... llCICD' ... _.... --- .......... -- -ru.u.T.UllAM ..... " =-Tiii~ ... ..,...,....~ l.&AC,W'~ ..... _.,_.,,,.. ~·.~ T01'4Llftllri91:1lfWTil.!l!SSHOWN: 1N• OVF FUT GLASS IS0 -40CIW Nie S111t M«aJ H.aMtic:Kip !'n::lflln Saeli-. Mdalffalide: Tbo OVF Flat Glau IOl6w.y hi:miftairt '8 ideli for .-dn11 lrila& ciaa.ll"U sntamt ar !jpa ~·-•--.:.. I , l.JOmSsnaFBJAM>WMATK~ wr1R SDial.Ak 10 MErl"XCll. DfD.a'rS .._.......... l. nll aACT LOCA TIOM Oft PED£lnJA)( SJl.IET UCimS 'Ml.L 11E n.ovmED WITH FJNAL. LAMDSCA1£tux. J. Df DaPD.10 AVOID UOAn' POU.UJ'ION, NO KILmUOK11HO SHAU n P'ltOYIDC wmD Gl!ENCDUa'n;OCC.UIONALLOWPATM UGHTINO ONJCl!'r CDUGI. TOGEnD Wini TlllJOkalUOBTl, IHAU COMnJSI UOKnMO AT Ol.HN CJ:IUa.D. PRIVACY FENCES: u.aix.--1,UIADl.MmmDO'WMllM'nm"-*ftLllCllOSaf~ 1H1f'O&.U)W'DGUlfllolQ.O!tN.o.o.notll fOU11t-WUTP~l.OC.\TIOlltll••z•.~:nWA1Jal ~;~ m=~r"~ ~=C(IU4Jf 0 ~~wtatr ~~~vnm• MOl.W&UTPAaNOUlCATic.ftljMODIM.ftWA?DJ ... , .. ,.... ftlONYllCUIAl.A1UI 6-lr DU.~a'9UICmAY'IQuaJ.' (} __.. ........... ............... ............. --MOC'COUMil,~Ol&l, ,_.__.... -~ -..c,-...._.. n£All.S*V9S'*"11.JlllWSSMOtl'ltOffT1111Pl.AN'11.L.•C9MDfAMOMO TIS rOUOWINCI urr .. a.Diii raOKIJ.11CIMI Sovnl·WUTf'~l.OC.\110Hl(WCDIU.ttWATll;j ira1 llUDDU.CADA'llbl •unan.TMa l f'~ Col.AAOAM.l.rYOMllL\ ....U..\.9,rYOWT raUMUI 90Rn?A-llll'TW OllU.l',a&PIMGwatDHUJCI rcrnwrau.nunmu. POTDmU.A. w.un wssn ,.....,..._,. ~f'ACl'IOIDCAfloNJ(MOODATZYA?D) t •tK.a OlAEllOWIUIJAl'ONICA'RUlt&A' OUDICLUO~ ,,_,. D&A. arcnnwu1 FOITUMIZ tl.IONnroft.ll, DeAl.O MASDICAAQW'OUUll OUCICNGL&N:MOU.l' P11UL\l .t.l'DllK.t.'AHnllltft'W,' ffav.,..urntlllf'fWATaD. ~wu.•novmcJUMrm~unor.-....nwATDumu • ~'tcn.rBn~ =.UIUI =~ A»GIJA.MANTDi!A CAW"1'1\JLAPD.llPOIJCA l. PRIVACY FENCES SHA.Ll. BE USED ONLYTri ENQ.DSE 1HE INJEUOR. SIDE YARDS AT SrNGLE FAMILY DETAOIED HOUSES AND DUPLEXES . NO PllVACY FENC! SHAU.BE PERMrrTED EXCEPT FOR. lHOSE THAT All£ SHOWN ON 1HEUNDSCAPE PLAN. LANDSCAJ'E PLAN NOTES; 2. LOTS AT Sl1lEET COllNEltS SHALL NOT DdPLOY >.NY PRIVACY FENCE. l . PJlJVAC'i FENC'e AT SIDE Y AJt.DS SHALL RA VE A SE'mA.Ck OP A MINIMUM OF TWELVE. rNCKES D.OM lHERONT FACE OF THE PllNCPAL SlltUcnJRE. ... NO PRIVACY FENCE SRAI.l. BE IDGHl!R. nlAN SOC FEET. 5. A SIDE Y AJUJ USE EASEMENT' SltAU. BEGllANTED TO raE LOT ON 1HE NOR.111 FllOM THE LOT ONTIIESOUTK. l. TOTAL J..ANDSCA!'E AREA CALC\JL.\TIONS AR.£ BASED ON A CONCEPTUAL SrTE PLAN. flNALPJtOVIDED LJ.NDSCAPE AREA WILLB! DErellMJNED AT THE TIME.OF FJNAL D!SIGN. AT NO TIME SHAU.LESS nt.AN 25% OFTlfE TOTAL.u2A BE PROVIDED AS LANDSCAPE AREA. AS DE!FD'fl!DWITHIN nos PUD, 2. SIDEWALKS SBOWN ON 1lE PLAN ARE NOT COUNTED AGAINST iHE LANDSCAJ'I! AREA CALCLn.ATIONS. l . EXACr DESIGN, lNC..UDING THELOCA.TJOW OFTJl.EES , SHI.UBS, PERENNlJ.L B!DS, SITEFURMISIDNG, ETC. SHALL 82 D!TERMINED AT THE TIME OF THE FINAL DESIGN. -4 . All. lJVDrlO LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE IMIGATED BY DRIP IIUUGATION. 5. THERE WlU. BE NO PR.ONT Y Al\D FENCES nDlOUGHOUTlHE PkOJECt. 6. PIUVACY FENC!S SHALL BEUSBD ONLY TO EHCLOSE THEINTEIUOll SID£ YAJlOS AT SINGLE FAMILY DETACHEDHOUSF.S AND DUPLEXES , AS SHOWN ON ntE PLAN. PRlV ACY FENCE AT SIDE YARDS NEEDS TO SETBACX MINIMUM TWE.VE INCHES FllOM nlEfRONT FACE OP llfE Pll.naCIPAL SlllUCTUllE.. w ~ ..J > I/) ~ a: ~ z 0 !:E ' I-z w == c z w :a < c ::> a.. ~ w w a: 0 c z < I/) ! .!I .. .!!i i8 5 Ii ...... C-•" --·-·-· •o E f ~ 8 .c "' .. I! il~~ • ~ !2. a•.a.: ..:. ;e" E .::us 0 c ~ z g , :3 0 a.. 0 w Q a.. ~ 0 0 I/) ::: c w z a :3 z w ,, ::::., --:- ~ _,.. --!Sl_I ~DI~~ I I . • 0 SHEET 7DF9 ;---7·----·--------------------·---------·-·------------------------·------------·--------------------·----------·----·-------·-----------·--·--------------------·----··------·------~-·---------·--·------------------- • DUPLEX DWELLING UNIT • ' [ BUILDING HEIGHT· . 42FEET · --- • 22'WIDE TOWN HOME OUP~ DWELLING UNIT 20'WIDE TOWNHOME SAND CREEK PUD AMENDMENT -IRON WORKS VILLAGE LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO SINGLE .-. FAMILY DETACHED HOUSE S!MG!-.E •. FAMILY DETACHED HOUSE DUPLEX DWELLING UNIT DUPLEX DWELLING UNIT SIHm..e FAMILY DETACHED HOUSE BLOCK ELEVATION ALONG SOUTH FOX STREET SCALE: 1" = 8' SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOUSE DUPLEX DWEWNG UNIT 16'WIDE I 16'WIDE TOWNHOME TOWNHOME 20'WIDE TOWN HOME 22'WIDE TOWN HOME 22'WIDE TOWN HOME 20'WIDE TOWNHOME 16' WIDE I 16' WIDE TOWNHOME TOWNHOME 20'WIDE TOWNHOME BLOCK ELEVATION FACING WEST: TWO SIX UNIT TOWNHOME BUILDINGS SCALE: 1" = 8' DUPLEX DWELLING UNIT SIDING WITH 4' EXPOSURE WITH NO CORNER TRIM 22'WIDE TOWN HOME --------·· ......,....,... § ;g_I x ii lio -e CJ ::i Ii w CJ ~ ..J s: ~ a: ~ ... z w ::& c z w :::! <I: c :::> II. ~ w w a: 0 c 11 • o E i~ 8 i; ... ~itDc! c 0 ....... . ~;. c ID IL 0 . ..i. :e.., E :n; fl) z 0 ~ > w ..J w ..J <I: a: :::> 0 w !::: ::c 0 a: <I: z <I: fl) i ·--__m__ i ~~-•_o __ ~ OM"Ml ft: --.!Q._ g .... ft: ~ I SHEET i 8DF9 i .! ---·········---· --·-··. ·I " I • I l _________ _ SAND CREEK PUD AMENDMENT -IRON WORKS VILLAGE LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO FIBER c:&E'NT IOAltO NCJ BA~ SJDINQ: 1r O.C. AR041'Ta:TURAL cc:i..osmcN ......... -·~ >····~ ~<2T ,<irLnr · ··:.::: · 1i~+ -·· .. ;; ---- 11 REfERENC_E LEVEL4j'LATE: 14.Q'.-O~ (2) l.~F°! ELEVATION (RIGHT ELEVATION O.H.) !: ;: _ _Rlf~ENCELeyEL4: 130:0.1~ REF 3RD FLOOR PLATE: 129'-8 7/8" ~ _ ~EF_E:RENCE LEVEL 3: 12.Q'.-7_3/4" ~ REF 2ND FLOOR PLATE : 119'-5" ~ ~EF_E:RENCE LgVEL 2 : 11.Q:-3 7/8" /lljt . REF 1ST FLOOR PLATE: 109'-11/8" ~ GA.'WiEDOOA I! I =~~c ~1 _ __ _ _ __ !lEFERENcyLEVEL1~100'-0" ~ I .-~·,·-----.,._--- .. ' ··· --,___ ARD<1'CTUAALCCMPO""°" -------------------...... ~ '""""' --< . --.....;. ----;;><:_ ~---......____ ~ ------~ ::-----......__ -----.....:.. ·.~ 112: JIJ I ~I I ! I I ! L ------- (1'l FRONT ELEVATION _!: r BEFEREN~E LEVEL 4J'LATE 1'!Q'-Q_~£ <411ji FIBER CEMENT SIOIHG; ~ L rEJCPOSURE ____ --~ __ REFsRENCE L~VEL 4 130_'.:11 518'._ ~ ,,_. I ----·-: REF 3RD FLOOR PLATE. 129'-8 7/8" •, ~1 ---, . ... ____ -~i __ _REE_E~l;NCE~ELL12..Q'-U~~ ;::....,, ··;;-_, lkor i t ------~r= .... _._B_EF2NDFLOORPLA'!:~J_19'-5"_~ ~! SM x <4 A&Efl CEMENT ;j, j ~__:"-_ -~L ___ R_EEJ'RENCE ~EL 2: 119·-~ 718" ~ -------~+--_REF 1ST FLOOR PLATE: 109'-11/8" ~ ADHEREDSYNTHE-nC • I STO.E VENEER ~ • ~I __ J ___ ~EFEREN~E LEVE\, t 1QQ::Q'.'._.,.. Ill(~. KEPHART community• panning • wctilect\#a I 11 ~ ... QIH Vt-:iP .. _.1li: -~I~ au:~~ .c z~H -i~~ ... ~-a·· C .... !• ~li =»"11& • cn~:i .a: E Z·H J:o~~~ I\ • E-~ v -~· 1H ~J!l l w CJ ~ > ~ a: o en 3: z z 0 0 i= !!: ~ ' w 1--0 ...J ffi 1· ': ~ :? Q ct I Q 0 a: z 0 ::::> W1 3:b :? I W W ct ..J 1-- Q CJ -z ::c: ::::> w 01· D. a: ~ I ct ~I I II ii I 11 1 ~1_JJ i1 I: : Ii l i 1! I i I =' I""··-_!l!'jl .. -l ,, i\1""·"'""~-1 l i j "DlllWlll~ sur.. -l ~ ~~;ii.Tl; ~-I i fg79 ]\ i I -·-·· ----·----------··-------· ---··---··----·-------·. ------·----------------·----·-------·-------· ·---·-----------------J • • I ~ • TITLE EXCEPTIONS . . ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PREPARED WITH lHE BENEFIT OF' OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TillE INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER NUMBER ABC70461075-S .'MTH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEBRUARY 11 , 2016 AT 5:00 P.M. . . ·---------------------------:------..;. _____________________________ ..;. _____________ _ EXCEPTION , -NO A.DDIT/ONAL INFORJlATION WAS PROVIDED ro rn SURVEYOR OT RECORIJ. ANY FACTS, RICHTS , INl'ERESTS, OR CLAIMS THEREOF", NOT SHOWN BY lHE PUBLIC RECORDS BUT 'THAT COULD BE ASCERTAIN~ BY AN INSP_E~n<'.>N Of THE LA.ND OR THAT MAY BE A~SERTE;> BY PERSONS I~. POSSE~ON OF THE LANO . EXCEPTION 2 -"NO . AiJJJJT/ONAL INTORllATION JrAS PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR OF RECORD. EASEMENTS, LIENS OR ENCUMBRANCES, OR CL'JMS TliEREOf". NOT SHO\Wll BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. EXCEPTION. 3 -. THIS SURVEY SERVES TO SATISFY THIS EXCEPTION. ANY ENCROACHMENT, ENCUMBRANCE, VIOLATION, VARIATION , OR ADVERSE CIRCUMSTANCE AFF£CTING lHE TITI.E lHAT WOULD BE DISCLOSED SY AN ACCURATE ANO COM~LETE LANO SUR\IEY OF lHE LAND ANO NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. EXCEPTION 4 -NOT SURVEY RELATED. ANY LIEN, OR RIGHT TO A LIEN, FOR SERVICES , LABOR DR MA TERI AL HERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, IMPOSED BY LAW ANO N~T SHO'AN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. · EXCEPTION 5 -NOT SURV ZY RELATED. DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES, ADVERSE CLAIMS OR OTHER MA TIERS, IF ANY, CREA lEO, FIRST APPEARING IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OR ATTACHING SUBSEQUENT TO THE EFFECTIVE DAlE HEREOF BUT PRIOR TO THE DAlE or THE PROPOSED INSURED ACQUIRES OF RECORD FOR VALUE THE .ESTATE OR 1NlER.EST OR MORTGAGE THEREON COVERED BY THIS COMMl"TMENT. EXCEPTION 6 -N01' SuRVEY RELATED. . (A) TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN AS EXISTING LIENS BY THE RECORDS OF ANY TAXING AUTHORITY THAT LEVIES TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS ON REAL PROPERTY OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS: (B) PROCEEDINGS BY A PUBLIC AGENCY THAT MAY RESULT IN TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS, OR NOTICES Of SUCH PROCEEDINGS, WHETHER OR NOT SHD'M-1 BY "THE RECORDS OF SUCH AGENCY OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. . . EXCEPTION 7 -JIANHARD CoNsULT/NC DID NOT EXAJ/INE A.NY UNPATENTED J/ININC CLAIMS. PA.TENTS. OR FATER RICHTS OR CLAJJ/S OF TITLE 1'0 rrATER AND THE SURVEYOR OF RECORD ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBJU'rY FOR ANY CLA.JJIS OR RlCHf' ON THE SURVEYED PROPERTY. . . . (A) UNPAlENTEO MINING CLAIMS ; {B) RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS Of' tN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE !SSU~NCE THEREOF; (C) WAlER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO ~ATER. EXCEPTION 8 -NOT SURVEY RELAfED. EXISTING LEASES ANO lENANCIES, IF ANY. EXCEPTION 9 -AFFEC'/'S SURVEYED PRDPERTY -SHOWN HEREON. EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE CITY Of ENGLEWOOD, FOR A WAlERLINE, ANO INCIDEN TAL PURPOSES. BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 17, 195.3, IN BOOK 817 AT PAGE .398 . . . EXCEPTION 1Q -IJITENTIONALLY DELETED. EXCEPTioN 11-DOES NOT APPEAR TO AFFECT SURVEYED PROPERTY -EASEJ/EN1' VACATED BY INSTRUJIENT . RE.CORill:D . ';;;BitfJAR"J' 2 'i ; ;,:;VO~ f.f;.;;;.'Jl .~"L.-t;Yltvll NC. B~(iJ";"~Zt; ... _,. $H(f"""N HEREON. EASEMENT GkANTEO TO UNOERGROUNO UTlU"TY LINES. PIPES AND STRUCTIJRES, FOi< l.INDERGROlJNO LJTIU1Y LINES. ANO INCIDENTAL PURPOSES , BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 20, 1985, IN BOOK 4521 AT PAGE 556 AND RECORDED SEPlEMBER 10, 1985 IN BOOK 4542 AT PAGE 315. EXCEPTION 12 -.AFFECTS SURVEYED PROPERTY -SHOWN HEREON. EASEt.tENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS. RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS ANO NOlES ON THE PLAT Of GENERAL IRON WORKS SUBDIVISION RECORDED DECEMBER 6, 1985 UNDER RECEPTION NO, 2609250. BOUt-:JDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT IN CONNECTION THEREWITH RECORDED JULY 2, 2002 UNDER RECEPTION NO. B2119969 EXCEPTION . 13 -DOES NOT APPEAR ro AFFEC1' SURVEYED PROPERTY -NOT PLOTT ABLE.. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS. BURDENS , OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH ANO CRANTED IN RAIL PASSENGER SERVICE EASEMENTS RECORDED APRIL 2. 1997, UNDER RECEPTION NO. A7038167. EXCEPTION 14 -AFFECTS SURVEYED PROPERTY -NOT PLDTTABLE. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROvt~ONS , BURDENS ANO OBLIGA"'TIONS AS SET FORTH IN VOLUNTARY NON-PARTictPATION AGREEMENT RECORDED JULY 12. 1999 UN.DER RECEPTION NO. A9112928. EXCEPTION 15 -INTENTIONALLY DELETED. EXCEPTION 16 -INTENTIONALLY DELETED. EXCEPTION 17 -INTENTIONALLY DELE1'ED. EXCEPTION 18 -INTENTIONALLY DELETED. EXC£PTION 19 -AFFECTS SURVEYED PROPERTY -NOT PLOTTABLE. TERMS , CONDITI ON S, PROVISIONS, BURDENS ANO OBLIGATIONS AS SET F"ORTH IN ORDINANCE NO . 5, 2012/2013 RECORDED MARCH 14, 2013 UNDER RECEPTION NO. D3031835. EXCEPTION 20 -AFFECrS SURVEYED PROPERTY -NOT PLDTTABLE. TERMS. CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS ANO OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN SANO CREEK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT RECORDED MAY 14, 2013 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 3059798. ALT A/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY PART OF LOT 1, GENERAL IRON WORKS SUBDIVISION AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO VENUE AMHE ST AVE. Ul !" Ul 0 () CD "' ::c: r "' > )> ,, z ::;: 0 z )> "' 0 ,, "' () "' "' "' Ul Ul Ul .... :-< .... I I '~-BATES AVE !" .., 0 x Ul .... ( NOT TO SC ALE ) LEGAL .DESCRIPTION LOT 1, C£NERAL IRON WORKS SUBDIVISION, EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED BY REGIONAL TRANSPORTA110N DISTRICT, AS RECITED IN RULE AND ORDER, CASE NO. Ol-CV-0060, EXHIBIT A, RECORDED FEBRUARY 24, 2004 UNDER RECEPTION' NO. B4033 155 AND RE-RECORDED APRIL 15, 2004 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 84067360 OF THE RECORDS Of 1HE ARAPAHOE COUNTY CLERK ANO RECORDER, TOGEl'HER WllH PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER Of THE NORTHWEST OUARlER OF SECTION 34, TOYINSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST Of THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY Of ARAPAHOE. STAT£ OF' COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: . !" )> n 0 ;::: )> Ul .... COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER Of SAID LOT 1 AND CONSIDERING THE SOUlH LINE Of SAID LOT 1 TO BEAR SOUTH 89'24'22" WEST, BEING MONUMENTED BY A NO. 4 REBAR IN CONCRElE ON THE EAST ANO A NO . 5 REBAR WITH A 1.5" AWMINUM CAP STAMPED PLS 28258 ON THE \YEST, 'MTH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO: THENCE SOUTH 89'24'22"' WEST, A DISTANCE Of 275.40 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89'24'22" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 375.92 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED JUNE 25, 2010 AT RECEPTION NO . 0060984 OF THE RECORDS Of THE ARAPAHOE COUNTY CLERK ANO RECORDER; . THENCE SOUTH 00"06 '.35" EAST, A OtSTANCE OF J0.06 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH UNE CW SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF: THE NORTHVt'EST OUARlER Of SECTION 34; THENCE SOUlH 89'23'48" 'NEST, A DISTANCE OF 90.7.3 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER Of THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34 TO THE EASTERLY UNE OF THE BURLI NGTON RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY (FORMERLY ATCHISON-TOPEKA AND SANTA Ft: RAILROAD). BEING A NON-TANGENT CURVE: THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEF"T HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02·15·21", A RADIUS OF 5779.65 FEET. AN ARC LENGTH Of 232.58. FEET, THE CHORD Of WHICH BEARS NORTH 12'48'28" EAST , A DI STANCE OF 232.57 FEET TO THE SOUniERLY LINE OF THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 1 CONDEMNED BY SAID CASE NO. 01-CV-0060. BEING A NON-TANGENT LINE; THENCE NORTHERLY ANO EASTERLY A.LONG LAST SA.ID SOUTHERLY LINE FOR THE FOLLO'MNG FOUR (4) COURSES : 1) NORTH 20'40'07" EAST, A DISTANCE Of 297.55 FEET TO A POINT Of CURVATURE ; 2) ALONG THE ARC Of A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RICH T HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE Of 34'57'08", A RADIUS OF 120.00 F'EET, AN ARC L£NGTH Of 7J.20 FEET. THE CHOR D Of WHICH BEARS NORTH 38'08'41" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 72.07 f'EET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; 3) NORTH SS'.37'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 512.87 F'E£T; 4)SOUTH 88'58'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 265.52 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF" SAID LOT 1; TH ENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG LAST SAID EASTERLY UNE F'OR THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES: 1) SOUTH ooi•'SQ'" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 53.41 FEET TO A NON-TANGENT CURVE: 2) ALONG lHE ARC OF A NON-TANG£NT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HA "1 NG A C(NlRAl ANG\.£ Of 60"22'23'", A RADIUS OF' 45 .00 FEET. AN ARC LENGiH OF 47.42 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 29 '54'56" 'NEST, A DISTANCE OF 45.25 FEET TO A NON-TANGENT UN[; .3) SOUTH 5910'27'" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 116.36 Ft.ET; 4)SOUTH 86'57'59'" 'l'fEST, A DISTANCE Of 28.10 FEET; 5) SOUlH 0012'50'" EAST, A DIST ANCE OF 320.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH !9'58'53" WEST, A DISTANCE Of 277.61 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 00'35'22'" EAST, A DISTANCE Of JJ7.95 F'EEl TO TH E POINT Of BEGINNING. SURVEYED AREA 369.089 SQUARE FEET (!.4731 ACRES)* !" CD ,, 0 )> 0 ::;: )> -< NOTES 1. NOTICE: ACCORDIN.G TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEF£CT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN TlilS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF 'THE CERTlflCATION SHOWN HEREON . . . 2. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINCL Y R040VES, AL TE.RS OR DEF ACES ANY PUBLIC l.ANO SURVEY MONUMENT OR LANO BOUNDARY t.tONUMENT OR ACCESSORY, COMMITS A CL~SS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO STATE STAlVTE 18-4-508, C.R .S. . . . . . . 3. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT cONsTITUTE A T1ll£ SEARCH BY MANHARo CONSULTING TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD . FOR All INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY, AND TITI.E OF' RECORD . MANHARD CONSULllNG RELIED UPON THE Tin.£ COMMITMENT PREPARED BY OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. COMMllMENT NO. ~BC70461D75-5 'MTH AN EFffCTl'V'E DATE or FEBRUARY 11 , 2016. AT 5: DO P.M. . . · 4. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE PERSON(S) OR ENTI"TY(S) NAMED IN THE CERTIFICATE HEREON. SAID CERTIFICATE DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAt.4ED PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(S) WITHOUT AN E_XPRESS RECERTlflCATION BY THE SUR>JEYOR N~ING SAID PERSON(S) OR ENTIT~(S}. 5. THE LINEAL UNIT USED IN 1li£ PREPARATION OF' lHIS PLAT IS THE U.S. SURVEY FOOT AS OEflNEO BY THE UNITED STAlES DEPARTMENT Of COMMERCE. NATIONA~ INSTITUTE Of STANDARDS A.ND TECHNOLOGY. 6. UTILITY LOCATIONS WERE DERl'VtO FROM OBSERVED SURFACE EVIDENCE . 7. BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1, GENERAL IRON WORKS SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN THE NORlHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER Of SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH. RANGE 68 WEST OF 1HE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN IS ASSUMED TO BEAR SOUltl 897.4'22" WEST BETWEEN THE FOUND MONUMENTS AS SHOYltol AND DESCRIBED HEREON. 8. FLOODPLAIN: THE SURVEYED PRDPERTY IS LOCATED 'MllflN ZONE X, OTHER AREAS -DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0 .2% ANNUAL CHANCE FlOOOPLAIN AS IOENTIFlEO BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (f"EMA) ON fLOOO INSURANCE RATE MAP (ARM) -MAP NUMBER D800SC0161K WITH AN EFFECTIVE OAT£ OF OF' O~CEMBER 17, ~01p. (TABLE . A, ITEM 3) 9. NO ZONtNc REPORT OR LETlER WAS PRO\J\OEO To lHE SURVEYOR . lHE SURVEYED PROPERTY IS CURREN TL y LOCATED IN THE CITY Of" ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO ANO IS ZONED PUO (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) WITH THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FROM THE SAND CREEK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. RECEPTION NO. 03059798 (TABLE A. ITEM 6(A))' . 1. MUL Tl-UNtT RESIDENTIAL OV£LUNGS a. MAl6t.4UM BUILDING HEIGHT: 75'-o· b. SETBACKS: 5'0'" FOR ALL MULTI-FAMILY USES c . DENSITY: MAXIMUM 45 OWEUING UNITS PER ACRE (45 OU /ACRE) d. FLOOR AREA/UNIT: MINIMUM 550 SQUARE FEET e . MAXIWUM FLOOR AREA RATIO: NONE . f. MINIMIJM OPEN SP-'CE (INCLUDES SIOEW.A!.)l'c;:): 25% g. Mii-4i111hJM LOT WIDTH : NONl . ., 2 . COt.IMERCIAL/tlDUSlRIAL a. DEVE:LOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSlRIAL USES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OUTUNEO FOR THE (MU-B-1 ) MIXED-USE CENlRAL BUSINESS ANO (1-1) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS FOUND IN TITLE . 16 OF THE ENGLEWOOD UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. . b. MAXIMUM HEIGHT; ioo·-o·. · c. SETBACKS: 10'-0'" FOR All NONRESIDENTIAL USES 4-. PARKING . a. PARKING GUIDELINES 'MLL BE PREPARED BASED ON FUTURE DEVELOPMENT USE ANO 'NILL BE SUBMITTED WITH A FINAL SITE PLAN AND Will UTILIZE TITI.E 16 Of THE ENGLEWOOD UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AS A BASIS .REDUCTION OF PARKING MAY BE PROPOSED FOR MULTI-FAMILY. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION TO : BLVD BUILDERS , UC. A COLORM)O llMITEtl UA91UTY COMPANY :OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TillE INSURANC( COMPANY : SANDC_REEK INV[STORS, LLC., A COLORADO LIMITrD UABILITY COMP~Y THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT TM IS MAP OR PLAT ANO ll-IE SURVEY OH 'M-llCH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2016 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAii. REQUIREMENTS FOR AlTA/NSPS LANO lll\..E SURVCYS, JO!Nn.Y ESTABLISHED ANO ADOPTED BY Al TA ANO NSPS. AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 3 , 4. 6(0), 8, ANO 11 OF TAB LE A THEREOF. THE FlElO WORK WAS COMPLEl!O ON : DA 1[ Of PLAT OR MAP : BRIAN J. PF"OHl COl.ORAOO PLS NO. 38445 f"OR ANO ON BEHALF" OF MANHA RO CONSUL TING 8008 E. ARAPAHOE COURT, SUllE 110 CfNlENNIAl, COLORADO 80112 (303) 70!-0500 CLERK&:-RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS f1lill FOR RECORD IN THE oma: OF THE COUHT"t' CLERK ANO RECORDER Of ARAPAHO( COUNTY, COLORADO ON lHE __ DAY Of , 20_ AT ----O'ClOCk _M. RECEPTION NO. ---------- BY: __...,==---------DEPUTT COUNTY CL£RtC AND RECOllDat ... CIH Vi-1fl .. _.l •. -~!! !lj • 1'1';:£ ""§~. .l!a..i" .cz§u -q·~ L.. ~!· r-s.' C .. Hji :::» ~ ~;g • cnhl I"' E ZH ~ogn .... UI[: ~·:ii .. ~ il~ -.. ~ . !~8 0 Q < a: g 0 0 !/) CL c.i' !/) z ... 0 ~ 0 0 ID := ~ w < ..J CJ z w II.. 0 ~ C3 l'N:W.•.; ...:!!L__ -~-·-"--~ ...2Ul!l!L .JJ1L_ SHEET 1 OF 2 BBLENC001.0D • ~· • £1 ~I Ii:' • ~, ~I ~-----------soo.J2;------------- ™~ COftNEJI: SECTION 34, T4S, RHW Q NQ. S REBAR W/3.~· M..UliMNUM CAP I STAMPED .. PlS 22571, 1ur IN RANGE BOX w;o ;=: I l!s.,; ·~I ~~ ;, i5j!i :?1 ti;f3 I itW ~ ~~ -~I ~~ §1 ~~ ~1 l!s~ !!'~ I :~ ~~ (N 38'0fl'1 4. E:) CH-N (02'29.0J")f>=218'21" R=5779.65' 1 (232.4'')l=232.58' (N 12'43'46' <>CH=N 12'48'28" E I 12, ..... >232.51· ""n::;i I I 0 ~ ct O' :::! "< :s ;{ I::: w i! iE J ~ .. ~1 0. <: f2 O.,· i-~ ~ fi ;:j :! g QJ ~<:!>-1s· WAl[R MAIN EASEMENT. BOOK 817, PACE 3518 (lH .lt') --~·~·---n;-C( ,JP>-.:,r;a; , .. l) NORlH SIX'IE£W1l.4 CORN.ER O.S WC...ST ., SECTION ).4, T4S. R68W o.l' IOClitTW f°OUNO 3 .25" COOT Al.UMINUM CAP STAMPED •plS ~1::~se95; (S 89"25'52· W"}S ALT A/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY PART OF LOT 1, GENERAL IRON WORKS SUBDIVISION AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO (02'12'•~1 boo2"32"44"' R•SJS.00' l•23.77' CHcS 15"06.,f E 23.77' L---==~--c==-=---+-:-----:--:-:---::--:----::=c-:::::::----1-1 --W-.-Y-A_L_E_ A VE.1'-:s~r"'oif~.'!!'~ sfoxn~ r•s. ••ow N BQ"30'02· E 1H.05' : ORllt UNE OF THE NORnn¥EST r-I I I ~1 '"'• I ESTMUSHED P051110N FROM MONUMDfT ___ c"~'~u· WI N ,!9~.'.£Ll. _ 1125.41' CN u·u.·s·· l ita.CM1 oi DUARlD OF ™E NORTHWEST I 1 RECOM> A.CCEP'l[D APRR. 14, 2001 ~ QUARTER OF SEC'TION 34, T4$, R68W I :~ ll.@T 2 I I ~~ I I ~...._+ .... ~ ~ .~:;.,.,• .. sl'~:+e· ~~o-· ;: I L011' 'V CUCEPV-1 rcECEPTIC». ,,_:::. 6403~155 N 897:9'11• £ 111at· .. ·2r() SURVEYED PARCEL PART OF LOT 1 POINT OF BEGtNNING F'DUNO NO. 5 REBAR W/l.25" OR.t.NGE PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "PlS 375169" 0.24' NORTH AN~ ON LIME in "' ,..: ,., "' "' s 89'58' 53• w UIV11 CUCD'Y-J ~·· I ZG w+ ~~ I ~ c+ w"' §fi ~ ~. -<_i!i -~ "g; ge :~ llc: 011" i~ i~ ..! ' ~ 1111>- z 8~ g ! : 15 "" I I I I I E (s 00'04'1a• W) I I f.-6Q'22'23"(S 601JO'OO" W) R•45.00' l•47.42°(47 .12') CH=S 29'54'56" W<s J0'04'11• Wl 45.25°(45.00') AMHERST ~VE. 1:? I I• "' ;:; Jr "'" ,8 ;:: tG •"' o.,. ~;! w ~· a: ,,.~ az ~ ~o r~ "ill w ~l!s a: Z« i wl!! "~ l!si5 ~l~~3 < 1l'IE~l!llY' lllilllil1l'BO~ ~; ..... BOOK , ACE 24 ~;: E~ ~ (/) I I I ~T-ES -AVENUE ----=--lNDRlHWEST sontEHlli CORN .. SEcn .. l•. T•s. •••w ~ ... • w n FOUND 1.5°' lu.EGIBl.£ ALUMIHUW CAP ~J a;,'c s $.0. IXJl(la t(lll))il))O'VDl!>&tl BOotc:1PG£46 BOOK 1, P ACE 45 GRAPHIC SCALE 1. • .J ii i ~ ~ 0 • 0 @ 0 -0- * . a. ex ® • @ ® 0 • ~ ( DI PEET) lincb.•BO.ft. LEGEND • EX. PROPEl'TY UHE -= EX. SE:CTION UNE • EX . L.OT LINE • EX. EASEMDIT UN[ • EX. CONCRElE CURI k GUTTER • EX. EDGE Of" PA'«MEHT • Ct SK>EWALk • Ct. CHAIN-UNK FtNCE (c.F) • EX. O~HrAD WIRES • SECTION CORNER • FOUND REBAR AS NOlED SET NO. S REBAR WITH • ~~p~':s ~;: CAP FLUSH 'MlH CROUNO FOUfC) NO. 5 REBAR WITH • l.2S-RED Pl.ASTIC CAP STAMPED "PLS J82sr F'OUNO NO. 5 Rf:BA'l MlH • 1.5" ALUMtNUM CAP STAMPED "Pl.S 28258" • ~~O. 4 REBAR MlH • EX. UTlUTY Pa.£ -EX. UTIUTY POlE wnl-1 UCMT • EX. BUFFALO BOX -EX. WATER MARKER • Ct ARE HYDRANT/AUX. VALvE • EX. VAL.vE BOX •EX. WAl'ER WETER • El. STORM MANHOLE (MH) • EX. SANITARY MANHOl.E {SMH} • EX. c:t.£ANOUT (CO) • O:. tn:U1'AD/P05:1 •EX. SICN i==, ., EX. CONCR£1E. BLOO: OR WOOD RCTAIHING WAU./PlANTER -•EX. ASPHALT D -EX. COHCRE1t ~ • llllE OCCEPTIOH NOTE Q.QQ • BOUNDARY OfMEWSION 0.00 • LOT DIMENSION (G.OOJ -RECORD DIMENSION NWLY • NOR1H\11£Sl[RLY ! 1 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF IMNHARD CONSUL TING -acus tim-tU }.i;o: L.·~sli ~I' a u1!l .c z~u -~·" c ~!H a cn:Jt zh~ %o~H uHi ~Jl!j II • 1 ·Ii' ·" l ·' ~ 111!; S~a IO Q < a: 0 ..J 0 0 u.i > 0 w w J: > < a: ::::> Q. ::::> z < rn w a: > < w < ..J II.. I-rn 0 ~ llJ ~ ~ Q z m z ~ I-::::> rn 0 rn w 0 Q. == c rn ... 0 z 0 ~ ~ ID ..J w < ..J c:> z w II.. 0 ~ u Neu.-. ...:!!!_._. -~~ ~ ~ ~ SHEET 2 OF 2 BBLENCOD1 .00 ·~ City of Englewood AGENDA ITEM 10 (a) PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER DATE : September 19, 2016 1A Public Hearing on the 2017 Fiscal Year Budget. ~ Speakers must sign up for Public Hearing ~ at the beginning of the meeting. Please limit ~our presentation to three minutes PLEASE PRINT NAME ADDRESS City of Englewood, CO : Legal/Public Notices Page 1of2 Legal/Public Notices • City of Englewood, Colorado • • In an attempt to reach a wider audience, we publish our Legal Publications and Public Notices on the Website, as well as in the Englewood Herald newspaper. The legal publications are published chronologically from oldest to newest (top) and will remain posted for 30 days. The linked files are downloadable PDFs . Agendas and Minutes for the City Council meetings can be found on the Meetings Portal. DATE PUBLISHED September 8, 2016 September 7 , 2016 August 23 , 2016 August 16, 2016 August 16, 2016 August 16, 2016 August 16 , 2016 August 9, 2016 July 26, 2016 July 15, 2016 Ordin ce 31-2016 (General Obligation Bond). TABOR City Council: Public Hearing (2017 Proposed Budget). MEETING DATE September 6, 2016 September 6, 2016 September 19 , 2016 City Council: Council Bill No . 30 -2016 (Ballot August 15, 2016 Ian age for General Obligation bond.) ty Council: Council Bill No . 29-2016 August 15, 2016 pproving first reading-Sand Creek Planned Unit evelopment). City Council: Ordinance No . 30-2016 (IGA with August 15 , 2016 Arapahoe County for November election.) City Council: Notice of Public Hearing (Sand Creek PUD) Board of Adjustment & Appeals: Notice of ublic Hearin (4461 S. Washington Variance) Pl nning & Zoning Commission : Notice of 8-1 -2016 Public Hearin Continuation (Sign Cod Liquor & Medical Marijuana Licensing Autho 1ty: Notice of 8-17-2016 Public Hearing (Whis y Biscuit Liquor License) September 6, 2016 September 14, 2016 August 16 , 2016 August17, 2016 http://www.englewoodgov .org/inside-city-hall/legal-public-notices 9/19/2016 • • • Notice of tonight's Public Hearing, on the 2017 Proposed Budget, was published on the City's Website from August 24th through today, September 19th. And it was published 3 times in the Englewood Herald: September 1st, ath and 15th . • • • PROOF OF PUBLICATION City of Englewood , Colorado Official Website www.englewoodgov.org I, Loucrishia A Ellis , City Clerk , for the City of Englewood , do solemnly swear that the attached legal notice (Notice of Public Hearing September 19 , 2016 on the 2017 Proposed Budget) was published on the Official City of State of Colorado SS County of Arapahoe Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 191h day of September, 2016. My Commission Expires : :f <.A. 'J BJ Z UL. o SEAL JACQUELINE McKINNON NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20164025867 MY COMMISSIO N_~ 0 ''~-S JULY 8. 2020 5k~Jt,.~ ary Public • • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING on the 2017 Proposed Budget SEPTEMBER 19, 2016 Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado will hold a Public Hearing on the 2017 Proposed Budget on Monday, SEPTEMBER 19, 2016, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers at Englewood Civic Center, 1000 Englewood Parkway, Englewood, Colorado. The purpose of the hearing is to receive citizen input concerning the 2017 Proposed Budget. Interested parties may express opinions in person at the Public Hearing, a sign-up sheet will be available at the door, or in writing, to be received by the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m. on September 19, 2016 . By order of the Englewood City Council Loucrishia A. Ellis, MMC City Clerk, City of Englewood 1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, Colorado 80110 PUBLISHED: August 24, 2016 Official Website of the City of Englewood, Colorado Colorado Community Media • 137 Ridgeline Blvd., Suite 210 ighlands Ranch, Co 80129 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION State of Colorado County of Arapahoe } ss This Affidavit of Publication for the ENGLEWOOD HERALD , a weekly newspaper, printed and published for the County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado, hereby certifies that the attached legal notice was published in said newspaper once in each week , for 3 successive week(s), the last of which publication was made the 15th day of September A .D ., 2016, and that copies of each number of said paper in which said Public Notice was published were delivered by carriers or transmitted by mail to each of the subscribers of said paper, according to their accustomed mode of business in this office. For the Englewood Herald State of Colorado } County of Douglas } ss The above Affidavit and Certificate of Publication was subscribed and sworn to before by the above named Gerard Healey, publisher of said newspaper, who is personally known to me to be the identical person in the above certificate on th e 19th day of September A.O ., 2016 . Gerard Healey has verified to me that he has adopted an electronic signature to function as his signature on this document. 20154048391-983833 • Heath er L. Crompton Not ary Public My commission ends Dec ember 18 , 2019 HEATHER L. CROM PTON NOTARY PUB UC STATE OF COLORA DO NO TARY ID 20 154048391 Cornnlissfon expi'atlon date: December 18, 2019 Public Notice CITY OF ENGLEWOOD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING on the 2017 Proposed Budget SEPTEMBER 19, 2016 Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado will hold a Public Hearing on the 2017 Proposed Budget on Monday, SEPTEMBER 19, 2016, at 7 :30 p .m., in the City Council Chambers at Englewood Civic Center, 1000 Englewood Parkway, Englewood, Colorado. The purpose of the hearing is to rece ive citizen input concerning the 2017 Proposed Budget. Interested parties may express opinions in person at the Public Hearing, a sign-up sheet will be available at the door, or in writing, to be received by the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m . on September 19, 2016. By order of the Englewood City Council Loucrishia A . Ellis, MMC City Clerk, City of Englewood 1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, Colorado 80110 Legal Noti ce No.: 57967 First Publication : September 1, 2016 Last Publication : September 15 , 2016 Publisher : The Englewood Herald and the Littleton Independent COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Subject Date September 19 , 2016 Agenda Item 10a Fiscal Year 2017 Bud et Public Hearin Initiated By artment Of Finance and Administrative Services Staff Source Kath Rinkel , Director PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION . The City Council is required by the Colorado Revised Statutes to adopt a balanced budget for all funds prior to the beginning of a new fiscal year. The Englewood City Council has previously studied the proposed Fiscal Year 2017 budget at workshops on April 18, August 22 , and August 29 , 2016. Council had set the date for the public hearing on the proposed budget for 19 September 2016 . RECOMMENDED ACTrON Staff recommends conducting a public hearing to obtain comments and concerns from the community regarding the proposed Fiscal Year 2017 budget prior to considering an ordinance for adoption of the budget on 3 October 2016. BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED Staff is very pleased to bring forth the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2017 . The budget process has been helpful in the understanding of the organization, its culture and priorities . Staff has provided the City Council and the community the highlights of the proposed budget. The City has implemented Priority Based Budgeting and with that used the following tools provided by the Center for Priority Based Budgeting : Fiscal Health and Wellness and Resource Alignment Diagnostic (RAD) in developing the jf osed budget. ~016 , the City reinstated the Information Technology Department that was previously part of the Finance and Administrative Services Department in 2016 budget and created in the 2017 proposed budget a new Communications Department by consolidating funds allocated to marketing within the individual department budgets . Staff looks forward to the input from the publ ic on the proposed budget and will be prepared to make any necessary amendments as directed by the Council as a result of the public hearing . The Council will have a workshop on 26 September 2016 to address any changes . FINANCIAL IMPACT The Fiscal Year 2017 budget is proposed to generate total sources of funds of $91 ,601 ,698 . Total uses of funds of $97 , 183 ,370 . The below chart depicts at a fund level the Estimated Beginning Balance, Sources of Funds, Uses of Funds and Estimated Ending Balance for 2017 . • :d,;,~~-j~JiI,~lli~¥ ~- Estimated Estimated Estimated Beginning Ending Unassigned Balance Sources Uses Balance Reserves Balance General Fund 8 ,883 ,842 45 , 186 ,231 45,046 ,747 9 ,023,326 4 ,773 ,099 4 ,250 ,227 • Special Revenue Funds Conservat ion Trust Fund 188 ,552 310 ,000 440 ,000 58 ,552 ,. 58 ,552 Community De-.elopment Fund 330 ,000 330 ,000 ,. Donors Fund 505,231 107 ,560 490 ,060 122 ,731 ,. 122 ,731 Malley Center Trust Fund 237 ,328 7 ,000 20 ,000 224 ,328 ,. 224 ,328 Parks & Recreation Trust Fund 459,278 15 ,000 320 ,000 154 ,278 ,. 154 ,278 Open Space Fund 234,367 811,427 912 ,000 133 ,794 ,. 133,794 Total Special Revenue Funds " 1,624 ,756 " 1,580 ,987 " 2 ,512,060 " 693,683 " " 693 ,683 Debt Service Fund General Obligation Bond Fund 64 ,135 1, 102 ,000 1,110 ,713 55,422 ,. 55,422 Total Debt Service Fund " 64,135 " 1, 102 ,000 " 1,110,713 " 55,422 " " 55,422 Capital Projects Funds Public lmpro-.ement Fund 1,693 ,001 2,998,356 4, 104,043 587 ,314 ,. 587,314 Capital Projects Fund 155,560 1,400,000 1,463,490 92,070 ,. 92 ,070 Total Capital Projects Funds 1,848 ,561 4,398,356 5 ,567 ,533 679 ,384 679 ,384 Total Governmental Funds 12,421 ,294 52 ,267,574 54 ,237 ,053 10,451 ,815 4 ,773 ,099 5 ,678 ,716 :e~c;.tl?rf~\1{¥;:17~°-:~-~-TYP~~., Estimated Estimated Estimated Beginning Sources Uses Ending Unreserved Balance Revenues Expenditures Balance Reserves Balance Enterprise Funds Water Fund 10 ,900 ,168 8,507,927 8 ,907,461 10,500,634 ,. 10,500 ,634 • Sewer Fund 3,467 ,126 16 ,225 ,259 17,854, 174 1,838 ,211 ,. 1,838 ,211 Stormwater Drainage Fund 1,222 ,343 332,514 379 ,085 1 ,175 ,772,. 1, 175 ,772 Golf Course Fund 551 , 168 2,115 ,300 2 ,078 ,625 587,843 587 ,843 Concrete Utility Fund 663 ,704 884 ,200 836,905 710,999 710,999 Hous ing Rehabilitation Fund 811,201 261 ,299 1,024 ,500 48 ,000 48 ,000 Total Enterprise Funds "17,615,710 "28,326,499 " 31 ,080 ,750 "14,861,459 " "14 ,861,459 Internal Service Funds Central Sennces Fund 31,546 306 ,815 290 ,214 48,147 48 , 147 SennCenter Fund 1,940 ,324 2 ,263 , 151 2 ,036,354 2 , 167 , 121 2 ,167 ,121 Capital Equipment Replacement Fund 2 ,303 ,684 1,042 ,489 2 ,170,804 1, 175 ,369 1, 175 ,369 Risk Management Fund 437 ,476 1,476 ,156 1,433,645 479 ,987 479,987 Employee Benefits Fund 200 ,671 5 ,919 ,014 5,934,550 185 ,135 185 , 135 Total Internal Service Funds " 4 ,913 ,701 "11 ,007 ,625 " 11 ,865 ,567 " 4,055,759 " " 4 ,055 ,759 Total Proprietary Funds 22 ,529 ,411 39 ,334 ,124 42,946 ,317 18 ,917 ,218 18,917 ,218 Total All Funds 34 ,950,705 91,601,698 97,183,370 29,369,033 4,773,099 24,595,934 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS • e City of Englewood, Colorado • • Budget Advisory Committee 2016 Annual Report Submitted on September 15, 2016 Prepared by Steve Ward, Chair Ben Rector, Vice Chair Shelley Manzano Christine McGroarty Harvey Pratt •· EnYOF lewood • g COLORADO WWN . eng lewoodgov. org/budget-advisorv-comm ittee The Budget Advisory Committee is pleased to present its third annual report to the Englewood • City Council. Because the issue brief on the Long Term Asset Reserve fund presented a complete background on the Budget Advisory Committee, we feel it is unnecessary to repeat the information. However, to provide context, we are sharing the following brief background of our committee and its activities. The Englewood City Council created the Budget Advisory Committee in May 2013 (Ordinance 16, Series 2013) with the following purpose: The Budget Advisory Committee (BAC) is established by Council and the City Manager to advise the City on the development, implementation and evaluation of the annual City Budget. Participation in the Budget Advisory Committee is an opportunity not only to advise on the prioritization of how city tax dollars are spent, but also to advise policymakers in their decision-making process in an open and transparent manner. Over the years, the BAC has been briefed on the following departments, issues and projects and The BAC has provided some comments and recommendations: • Fire Department • Parks and Recreation • Police Department • Community Development • Priority based budgeting • Municipal revenue • Long Term Asset Reserve Fund (L TAR) This year's report covers the following topics: • 2015-2016 budget cycle accomplishments 0 Priority-based budgeting 0 Transparency and the OpenGov Portal 0 Increased accessibility to Council meetings and materials • Unfinished business 0 Safety Services Building 0 Police Staffing ° City Revenue • Closing requests 0 Remove sunset provision from BAC ° Change focus from a single annual report to multiple issue briefs 2015-2016 Budget Cycle Accomplishments Priority Based Budgeting Last year the BAC briefly touched on the Priority Based Budgeting initiative started by the city. Over the past year the BAC spent time with city staff and members of the Center for Priority Based Budgeting (CPBB). This year we would like to provide an update on what we learned and where we see value in this initiative. Budget Advisory Committee 2016 Annual Report to Englewood City Council September 15, 2016 • • 2 • • As mentioned last year, the BAC is very enthusiastic about reviewing the fiscal health and wellness data provided by the Fiscal Health Diagnostic Tool. In February of this year, members of CPBB presented annual trend information that shows the fiscal position of Englewood . This tool will allow the city council , staff, and members of the community to see not only how the expenditures are trending over time, but also the nature of the revenues and expenditures . Are they one-time or ongoing streams? Th is is important in determining if ongoing revenues are sufficient to fund ongoing operational expenses, and if one-time sources adequately cover projects and capital needs. Based on the latest figures that the BAC and city council have seen, one time sources of revenues are projected to taper off over the next five years . This is important to note as the reserves of the general fund balance continue to diminish year over year, and are in the "red" by 2021 . One time sources will not be able to make up the difference, much less keep the fund balance reserve in policy compliance . This insight should give pause to city council and the citizens of Englewood . Although the city is fiscally healthy, the future may not have continued fiscal wellness, if the reserve is continuously used to balance the budget. The BAC believes that the proposed 2017 budget shows great promise in stemming that tide by growing the reserve even if by only a small amount. Since the community results are products of the Citizen Survey, Comprehensive Plan, and the City 's Mission, Vision, and Values statements, it is expected that they will adapt to the changing needs and aspirations of the citizens of Englewood. A reasonable expectation is that the programs are reevaluated with regularity to ensure their continued relevance to the community. Also, final prioritization , through funding, rests with them. The BAC is very impressed by the progress that has been made on the priority based budgeting initiative and believes that it is the foundation on which a great community can be made to thrive . See Appendix A for a more technical discussion of the BAC's understanding of how PPB works . Increasing Transparency The past year saw the implementation of two new initiatives in Englewood to increase the citizens' access to information about how the city works . First, the OpenEnglewood financial portal (http ://englewoodgov.org/inside-citv-ha ll /city-departmentslfinancial-services/open- finances-portal) contains in-depth data on the city's finances including the city's payment register. Through the OpenEnglewood financial portal, concerned or curious citizens can see in-depth detail on how the city spends our money. There is also a salary information system that shows the annual salary for each employee in the city (by title). The BAC lauds the addition of these systems and the increased focus on transparency that their availability demonstrates . The second major accomplishment for transparency in Englewood this year was the update to the city council meetings portal. Previously, citizens could download audio of Council meetings, but many citizens reported technical difficulties when attempting to access the meeting recordings . Now, through the city 's meetings portal (https://en g lewoodg ov .civ icweb .net/Portal/), citizens can watch live and archived video of city council meetings and study sessions . • Obviously, this new technology was not free, but the members of the SAC believe that the cost Budget Advisory Committee 2016 Annual Report to Englewood C ity Council September 15, 2016 3 of development and bandwidth for the city council meeting portal is a worthwhile expenditure • of taxpayer dollars because it better serves the needs of interested citizens. Issue Brief: Long Term Asset Reserve This year, the BAC delivered its first issue brief to Council. In our issue brief, we discussed the city's long term asset reserve account. For reference, the issue brief to this report is located at the following link: http://englewoodgov.org/inside-citv-hall/boards-and-commissions/budget- advisory-committee . The members of the BAC were pleased at the opportunity to explore the long term asset reserve fund in depth and to better understand the creation and maintenance of this account. We decided to write and submit an issue brief based upon the feedback that we received from Council during the BAC study session where we delivered our 2015 report to Council. We wanted to address Council's concern that the timing of our annual report was less than ideal because it directly abuts the adoption of the annual budget. Going forward , we welcome the opportunity to submit more issue briefs to Council. We discuss the issue brief concept among our suggestions for improvement and our closing remarks to Council at the end of this report . Unfinished Business Safety Services Building In our 2014 report, the BAC alerted Council to ongoing and upcoming problems with Englewood's aging infrastructure . Our 2014 report focused on concerns with fire department buildings and apparatus as well as the upcoming expense to replace the chiller at the Englewood Recreation Center. Council addressed both of those issues in 2015 . • For our 2015 report cycle, the BAC members spoke with the Chief of Police, John Collins . Chief Collins alerted us to the issues with the safety services building. At that time , the cost to rebuild or replace the building was estimated at between $15 and $16 million. In our 2015 report, we recommended Council investigate funding options to replace the police building . Unfortunately, that recommendation was not acted upon until July 2016 when the Englewood City Council commissioned an opinion poll of Englewood's citizens . According to the record of the July 5, 2016 Council meeting, the polling and political consulting provided in relation to the poll, cost the taxpayers of Englewood $30,000.00 . Much of the polling was focused on the issues surrounding the safety services building. One of the goals of the poll as we understand it was to gauge the citizens' interest in approving a bond issue and the associated property tax increase for the purpose of building a new safety services building. The members of the BAC are always on the lookout for ways that Englewood can apply taxpayer dollars to the best use possible . In the future, we believe that the best way to poll the citizens on tax policy is at the ballot box. While elections cost money , there is already an election scheduled in November, and we find it difficult to believe that the money spent on the poll provided anything of value to the average taxpayer in Englewood. In the past, the members of the BAC have been frank about our preference for funding large capital projects such as the replacement of the city center with bond dollars rather than with more expensive COPs or other "creative" funding methods. Although the poll results showed that the citizens who were polled are strongly in favor of passing a bond to fund the replacement Budget Advisory Committee 2016 Annual Report to Englewood City Council September 15 , 2016 • 4 • • • of the police building, we fear that three months is an inadequate amount of time to complete the required public outreach and to educate Englewood's voters on the reasons for the request. Going forward, we encourage Council to plan ahead for major capital projects such as the safety services building, future parks and recreation projects, and road and bridge replacement rather than attempting to pass a bond issue on a three-month timeline . History shows that when Englewood's leadership asks the city's citizens for a tax increase, it is best to begin public outreach as early as possible. For example, the Pirate's Cove bond effort began over a year in advance of the request on the ballot. The BAC addressed Englewood's history with bond requests in our 2014 report to Council. Police Department Staffing In our 2015 report, we addressed Chief Collins' desire to change the Englewood Police Department's hiring model. Chief Collins stated that by hiring officers before they are Peace Officers Standards and Training (POST) Board certified, Englewood could gain access to a larger pool of candidates. This method would increase hiring costs, but was said to allow Englewood to hire the best-qualified candidates into long-term positions. In the study session on August 29, 2016, Chief Collins discussed police department staffing. Although Council authorized the new hiring model for two candidates in 2015, neither candidate was able to complete the hiring process and become an Englewood police officer. In the same study session, the chief indicated that the Englewood Police Department is currently understaffed by four to five police officers . The lack of officers has forced the chief to close .Englewood's traffic bureau . There is no question that the citizens of Englewood rely upon the Englewood Police Department to keep us safe. The public safety provided by adequate police coverage is critical to Englewood's long-term health. An inadequate head count can lead to increased overtime costs and pose a danger to the citizens if tired officers are patrolling the streets or the need to remove additional officers from duty due to injury or job-related incidents arises. We urge Council to immediately address the police staffing problem, and encourage Council to use money from reserves to fill open police department positions as necessary . Examining the City's Revenue Streams Both our 2014 and 2015 reports to City Council addressed our concern over the lack of stability and diversity in the city's revenue streams. This year's adoption of the Priority Based Budgeting model shows that under the current structure, in just a few years, the city may be dipping into reserves to balance the budget. The members of the BAC see the threat that the city's reliance on sales tax as its primary revenue source presents to the long-term financial stability of the city. The BAC strongly encourages the members of Council to examine the property tax rates of residential and commercial properties in nearby municipalities such as Sheridan, Littleton, Centennial, and Denver. While we relish the comparably low property taxes that we pay as citizens of Englewood, we believe that a comparison of nearby property tax rates may show that there is room to shore up Englewood's upcoming financial gaps. We understand that Council cannot set or increase the property tax rate without the consent of the citizens, and we are not recommending a property tax increase. However, we would like to see both Council Budget Advisory Committee 2016 Annual Report to Englewood City Council September 15, 2016 5 and the citizens develop a better understanding of where Englewood is situated relative to other municipalities and the relationship between taxation and a city's ability to provide services. • Closing Requests Sunset Provision The members of the BAC have been honored to serve the City of Englewood since the BAC's inception in 2013 . Since that time, Englewood has changed quite a bit. The city's chief executive changed. The Englewood Fire Department was closed in favor of a contract for services with Denver. Three new Council members were elected in 2015. The upcoming 2017 budget cycle is the first year of priority-based budgeting. We believe there is value in continuing the BAC's mission into future years . We would like to take this opportunity to ask Council to remove the sunset provision from the BAC ordinance. The BAC is currently set to sunset in May of 2017. This sunset would prevent us from issuing a report to Council on the proposed 2018 budget and the progress of priority based budgeting . We hope that Council derives some value from our service; as citizens, we derive great value from gaining an understanding of how the city works and from interacting with the staff that serves the City of Englewood . BAC Annual Report The BAC 's ordinance includes a requirement to deliver an annual report to Council. In our 2015 study session with Council, several Council members indicated that our annual report wasn't as useful as it could be because of the delivery schedule. The annual report is due to Council before the public hearing on the budget. This schedule results in a rush to finish the report • because the budget is still being completed while the SAC is generating the annual report. If Council chooses to renew the BAC's charter, we respectfully request Council remove the requirement for an annual report . We believe that Council's needs may be best served with issue briefs throughout the year rather than a single annual report . The timing of the annual report adds to the large quantity of budget information that Council receives before the annual budget hearing. The BAC report may be being overshadowed because of the demands of the September 15th budget deadline . Closing The members of the BAC would like to thank the city staff members who have assisted us in the performance of our duties. Municipal budgeting is a complicated process, and several of our members have overcome a lengthy learning curve with the cheerful assistance of staff. We hope that Council finds our perspective useful, and we look forward to assisting our fellow citizens in understanding Englewood 's budget in the future . Budget Advisory Committee 2016 Annual Report to Englewood City Council September 15 , 2016 • 6 • • • Appendix A: Priority Based Budgeting (PBB) Technical Another output of fiscal wellness and the PBB initiative is the program inventory and ranking, which can be found in the Resource Alignment Diagnostic (RAD) tool. The program inventory included 16 funds, and almost 800 programs. As this information is vast, the BAC found it useful to have staff and members of CPBB to explain some of the details . One of the most important aspects of the inventory is how all of these programs can be prioritized and placed in quartiles . Each program was evaluated against PBB's "basic program attributes" (BPA): • Level of mandate • Reliance on the city to provide • Cost recovery • Change in demand • Portion of the community served Aggregated together, these BPAs are 25% of the tiered calculation. The other 75% consists of how relevant the program is to the seven community results : • Attractive, Engaged, Inclusive , and Welcoming Commun ity with Desirable , Livable Neighborhoods • Effective Mobility and Reliable Infrastructure • Orderly Well-Managed Growth and Development • Recreational, Cultural, Educational, and Life-Long Learning Opportunities • Safe and Healthy Community • Sustainable Natural Environment • Thriving and Vibrant Local Economy They are the desired outcomes from the programs. Therefore, the most relevant programs to the community will end up in the higher quartiles . Budget Advisory Committee 2016 Annual Report to Englewood City Council September 15, 2016 7 • • • COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Subject: September 19, 2016 11ci COOT Easements Acquisition Resolution of Support Initiated By: Staff Source: Englewood Mclellan Reservoir Dave Henderson, EMRF Board Member Foundation PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION In 1999, City Council authorized the creation of the Englewood Mclellan Reservoir Foundation (EMRF). Staff discussed CDOT's intent to acquire these easements at the September 12, 2016 Study Session. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends Council approval of the resolution supporting EMRF's agreement with the Colorado Department of Transportation (COOT). The agreement would grant COOT seven easements -six permanent easements and one temporary construction easement, in exchange for a payment of $260,000. BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED COOT will be adding a toll lane to C-470. The project generates the need for storm water detention and drainage improvements to accommodate the widening. COOT has awarded a contract for this construction project and is in the process of obtaining easements and right of way from many owners along the corridor between 1-25 and Kipling St. In April, 2016, COOT approached EMRF regarding the need for these drainage easements. As final plans were developed, COOT identified the specific parcels required and provided legal descriptions to EMRF. Subsequently, COOT commissioned appraisals of all seven parcels. The appraisal report and initial offer were delivered in late July. EMRF, along with EMRF's real estate attorney, reviewed the offer and associated documents. The requested easements will not adversely affect EMRF's developed property or preclude any future development of EMRF property . Generally, CDOT's proposed acquisitions will utilize existing storm water detention facilities owned by EMRF . The existing facilities have plenty of capacity to accommodate COOT storm water from C-470. Utilizing our existing ponds for this drainage area is in the best interest of COOT and the adjacent properties. Construction of new storm water facilities would require fee acquisitions for property and millions of dollars. It should be noted that COOT will acquire these easements by agreement or eminent domain. COOT prefers to acquire by agreement in lieu of condemnation proceedings. Pending Council's support of the agreement, EMRF will schedule a closing with COOT. We expect the closing will take place within 30 days. FINANCIAL IMPACT The appraisal report suggested a fair market value of $231,400. EMRF countered COOT's offer and was successful negotiating a $260,000 lump sum payment for all seven easements. This amount is 12.4% above the initial offer. This one time revenue will be transferred to the City's General Fund. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Easement Location Map Initial Offer of Fair Market Value Parcel Information Resolution • • • • • • J1.Ylf COLORADO l,B.Y : Department of Transportation -• Region 1 Right of Way Department 2000 South Holly Street Denver, CO 80222 OFFER OF FAIR MARKET VALUE Mr. Rick Kahrn, Mr. Tom Brennan, Mr. Dave Henderson Englewood McLellan Reservoir Foundation l 000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, CO 80110 Project No.: Project Code: Location: Parcel: Date: NHPP 4701-124 18999 C-470, Kipling to 1-25 PE-2, PE-2A, PE-4, PE-4A, PE-6, PE-SA & TE-5 July 25, 2016 The Colorado Department of Transportation offers you the following amount as fair market value compensation for your property located in Douglas County, Colorado. The amount offered was determined in accordance with applicable Federal and State laws and requirements. I. Land .................................................. $0.00 2. Permanent Easements ........................ $226,836.00 3. Temporary Easements ....................... $ 4,478.00 4. TOT AL ............................................. $231,400.00 (rounded) We based our detennination on the following infonnation: a. Identification of the real property to be acquired: (see legal descriptions) b. Type of interest being acquired: Permanent Easements & Temporary Easement c. Identification of all improvements, including fixtures to be acquired: None d. Identification of real property improvements, including fixtures to be acquired which are not owned by the landowner: NIA . 'cerely, fl ~n~-- Acquisition/Relocation Specialist cc : Project Development BrJilch (ROW Sen ices) Region ROW Previous edi tions are ob;olctc and may not be used COOT Fann #240 07/06 • • • • • July 25, 2016 COLORADO DepartnlentofTransportation Region 1 Right of Way Department 2000 South Holly Street Denver, CO 80222 Mr. Rick Kahm, Mr. Tom Brennan, Mr. Dave Henderson Englewood Mclellan Reservoir Foundation 1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, CO 80110 Gentlemen: Project No .: Project Code: Location : Parcel: NHPP 4701 124 18999 C-470, Kipling lo 1-25 PE-2, PE-2A PE-4 , PE-4A , PE-6, PE-SA & TE-5 The Colorado Department of Transportation (COOT) has an upcoming project along C-470 from Kipling to 1-25 in Douglas County, Colorado. The project is to provide congestion relief, decrease travel delays, and Improve corridor rellabllity. Englewood Mclellan Reservoir Foundation owns property that wlll be affected by thls project (see parcel(s) listed above). We would like to acquire from you 6 permanent easements totaling 663,655 square feet and 1 temporary easement totaling 10,661 square feet. COOT Is currently in a position to present you with Its offer of fair market value for the parcel in the amount of $231,400.00. This offer amount was determined based In accordance with applicable Federal and State laws and requirements. This amount Is offered as total compensation for all interests in the property and damages, If any, to the remaining portion of your property and Is determined as follows: PE-2 is 443,258 square feet X $.75 per square foot@ 20% Unit Value= $66,488.70 PE-2A is 5,802 square feet X $5.15 per square foot@ 20% Unit Value= $ 5,976.06 PE-4 is 17,963 square feet X $10.40 per square foot@ 20% Unit Value= $37,363.04 PE-4A is 11,392 square feet X $10.40per square foot@ 20% Unit Value= $23,695.36 PE-6 is 33,952 square feet X $10.40 per square foot@ 20% Unit Value= $70,620.16 PE-6A is 151,288 square feet X $.75 per square foot @ 20% Unit Value= $22,693.20 TE-5 is 10,661 sq. ft. X $1.05 /square foot@ 10% Unit Value x 4 yrs.= $4.477.62 Total $231,400.00 rounded Our total offer to you Is $231,400.00 roundi!d. Enclosed with this letter are the following documents: 1. CDOT Right-of-Way Information Booklet 2. Offer of Fair Market Value (COOT form 240) 3. Memorandum of Agreement (CDOT form 784) with Legal Descriptions attached 4. Right of Way Plan Sheets S. Request for Taxpayer Identification Form (W-9} 6. Permanent Easement Document 7. Temporary Easement Document 8. Demographic Information form with addressed stamped envelope to return to COOT (Voluntary) Please review this information and If you have any questions regarding this offer or any of the enclosed documents, please do not hesitate to contact me. Once you have reviewed the documents, please sign the Memorandum of Agreement and complete and sign the W-9 form and return the documents to me in the enclosed stamped envelope addressed to me. Upon receipt of the signed documents, I will commence the payment procedures. We will need the Permanent Easement document signed at closing. Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter and should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (303) 512-5999 or terrene.shendleman@state.co.us . 2000 Sout'l Holly Street, Denver, CO 80222 P 303.512 .5999 F 303 .757.9053 wv,w .coloradodot.in fo I PARCEL INFORMATION TE-5 Temporary Easement 10 ,661 sq . ft . • Land value $1.05 /sq. ft. or $11 ,194.05 Easement purchase 10% of value per year for 4 yrs. $ 4,477.62 Notes: Non developable parcel remnant Existing drainage area eastbound on-ramp PE-2 Permanent Easement 443,258 sq. ft. Land value $0.75 /sq. ft. or $332,443 .50 Easement purchase 20% of value $66,488.70 Notes: Existing detention pond FEMA Regulated 100 yr . Flood Plain PE-2A Permanent Easement 5,802 sq. ft . Land value $5.15 /sq. ft. or $29,880.30 Easement purchase 20% of value $ 5,976.06 Notes: Platted vacant lot No utilities-lift station required for sewer service Encumbered by existing pipe easement PE-4 Permanent Easement 17,963 sq . ft . Land value $10.40/sq . ft . or $186 ,815 .20 Easement purchase 20% of value $37,363.04 • Notes: Platted lots leased to Auto Dealer (Mike Ward) Encumbered by existing pipe easement PE-4A Permanent Easement 11 ,392 sq . ft. Land value $10.40/sq . ft. or $118 ,476 .80 Easement purchase 20% of value $23,695.36 Notes: Platted lots leased to Auto Dealer (Mike Ward) Encumbered by existing pipe easement P E -6 Permanent Easement 33 ,952 sq . ft . Land v alue $10.40 sq . ft. or $353 ,100.80 Easement purchase 20% of v alue $70,620.16 Notes: Platted lot leased to Auto Dealer (Larry Miller) Encumbered by existing pipe easement PE-6A Permanent Easement 151,288 sq. ft. Land value $0 .75 /sq . ft. or $113 ,466 .00 Easement purchase 20% of value $22,693.20 Notes: Existing detention pond Total (rounded) $231,400.00 CDOT Revised off er is $260,000.00 • Total square footage for all easements is 674 ,316 sq. ft . (15.48 acres) The average acquisition cost to CDOT for all 7 e asements is $0.39/sq. ft . • • • RESOLUTION NO . SERIES OF 2016 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE ENGLEWOOD MCLELLAN RESERVOIR FOUNDATION AGREEMENT WITH THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CDOT) FOR THE GRANTING OF SEVEN EASEMENTS AROUND THE ENGLEWOOD MCLELLAN RESERVOIR PROPERTY TO ACCOMMODATE THE WIDENING OF C-470. WHEREAS, the Englewood McLellan Reservoir Foundation was formed to oversee the development of the McLellan Reservoir property; and WHEREAS, CDOT will be adding a toll lane to C-470, which generates the need for storm water detention and drainage improvements to accommodate the widening; and WHEREAS, in April 2016 CDOT approached EMRF regarding the need for these drainage easements and final plans were developed in which CDOT identified the specific parcels required and provided legal descriptions to EMRF and commissioned appraisals of all seven parcels; and WHEREAS, CDOT's proposed acquisitions will utilize existing storm water detention facilities owned by EMRF; and WHEREAS, EMRF has reviewed the offer and associated documents and has determined that the requested easements will not adversely affect EMRF's developed property or preclude future development of EMRF property . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby supports the Englewood McClellan Reservoir Foundation granting Colorado Department of Transportation Memorandum of Agreement the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Seven Easements of the Englewood McLellan Reservoir Property to accommodate the widening of C- 470, attached hereto as Exhibit A. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 19th day of September, 2016. ATTEST: Joe Jefferson, Mayor Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk for the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify the above is a true copy of Resolution No . __ , Series of 2016 . Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF Project Code: 18999 I Parcel No: PE-2, PE-2A, PE-4, PE- 4A, PE-6, PE-6A, TE-5 TRANSPORTATION Project No: NHPP 4701-124 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Location: C-470, Kipling to 1-25 County: Douglas I State Highway No: C-470 This agreement made on is between the State of Colorado for the use and benefit of the Colorado Department of Transportation (GRANTEE) for the purchase of the parcel(s) listed above from the Owner(s) ENGLEWOOD I MCLELLAN RESERVOffi FOUNDATION, a non-profit (GRANTOR). Colorado corporation Just compensation was detennined by an appropriate valuation procedure prepared in accordance with Colorado state laws and regulations. The amount of money and/or compensation listed below is full consideration for the following land, easements, improvements, and damages of an·1 kind. Land (described in attached exhibits) Sq.ft.O/acresO $ Permanent and Slope Easements (described in attached 663,655 Sqftjgl/acresO $226,836.00 exhibits) Temporary Easements (described in attached exhibits) 10,661 Sq.ft.jg]/acresO $4,478.00 Improvements None $0.00 Contributory Value $0.00 Gross Total $231,314.00 Less Credit $ Net Total $~~I ,4QQ.QQ $260,000.00 Other conditions : The GRANTOR: I) Will, at the closing, pay all taxes (including prorated taxes for the current year) and special assessments for the current year; 2) Has entered into this agreement only because the GRANTEE has the power of eminent domain and requires the property for public purposes; 3) Be responsible for securing releases from all liens, judgments and encumbrances to deliver clear, unencumbered title to GRANTEE. Any encumbrance required to be paid by GRANTOR shall be paid at or before closing from the proceeds of the transaction hereby contemplated or from any other source; 4) Will execute and deliver to GRANTEE those documents indicated below; 5) Excepts from the subject property described herein in the attached Exhibits, the mineral estate and including all coal, oil, gas and other hydrocarbons, and all clay and other valuable mineral in and under said subject property. The GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that the GRANTEE shall forever have the right to take and use, without payment of further compensation to the GRANTOR, any and all sand, gravel, earth, rock, and other road building materials found in or upon said subject property and belonging to the GRANTOR; and 6) The GRANTOR further covenants and agrees that no exploration for, or development of any of the products, as described above, and owned by the GRANTOR heretofore or hereafter the date set forth above and hereby excepted will ever be conducted on or from the surface of the premises described in the attached Exhibits, and that in the event any of such operations may hereafter be carried on beneath the surface of said premises, the GRANTOR shall perform no act which may impair the subsurface or lateral support of said premises. These covenants and agreements hereunder, shall inure to and be binding upon the GRANTOR and its heirs, personal and legal representatives, successors and assigns forever. Puge I of2 COOT Form #784 ~ l .12012 Editions prior to 1/2012 are obsolete and may not be used • • • E ~ I B I T A NOTE: At GRANTOR'S sole discretion, the GRANTOR may convey the underlying mineral estate owned by RANTOR to the GRANTEE. GRANTEE makes no representations about the nature, title or value of the mineral tate. In transactions where GRANTOR conveys the underlying mineral estate to GRANTEE, Paragraphs 5 and 6, as set forth above, will be deleted from this Memorandum of Agreement and the conveyance document. D GRANTOR conveys the underlying mineral estate to GRANTEE. Paragraphs 5 and 6 are hereby deleted from the Memorandum of Agreement and the conveyance document. The GRANTEE: I) Will be entitled to specific perfonnance of this agreement upon tender of the agreed consideration; 2) Will be held harmless from any claims against the property or to any interest in the property, except for any benefits due under relocation law; 3) Will make payment after receiving acceptable conveyance instruments from the GRANTOR; 4) Will take possession and use of the parcel(s) when it deposits the consideration, as set forth above, into an escrow account for the benefit of the GRANTOR, or when GRANTEE disburses funds to GRANTOR. Transfer of title to the parcel(s} shall occur upon perfonnance of any and all tenns under this agreement, and release of the payment from escrow to the GRANTOR, unless other arrangements are made that follow Title III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act of 1970. as amended: and 5) Will prepare the following documents: D General Warranty Deed D Utility Easement D Access Deed (81 Pennanent Easement D Full Release(s) Book/Page: D Slope Easement D Partial Release(s} Book/Page: (81 Temporary Easement Or (specify) [81 Title Company to prepare documents except conveyance document Order Warrant $231, 4 00. 00 $260,000.00 Payable to: Front Range Title of Downtown Denver, LLC as escrow agent for ENGLEWOOD /.MCLELLAN RESERVOffi FOUNDATION, a non-profit Colorado corporation Order Warrant$ Payable to: Real Estate Specialist Division approval (Region ROW Manager) cc: Project Development Branch -ROW Services (original) Property Owner Region Right-of-Way Manager GRANTOR signature GR.ANTOR (if applicable) GRANTEE signature • ion Program Engineer/Resident Engineer/Project Engineer ge 2 of2 Editions prior to 112012 are obsolete and may not be used Attach form W-9 COOT Fonn #784 -112012 ' .. •· ' I August 31, 2016 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION of COLORADO Nathan Woodliff-Stanley, Executive Director Mark Silverstein, Legal Director RECEIVED SEP ;~ 2016 ENGLEWOOD, CO SENT VIA U.S. MAIL AND EMAIL: jjefferson@englewoodgov.oQfFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Joe Jefferson, Mayor City of Englewood 1000 Englewood Pkwy. Englewood, CO 80110 Dear Mayor Jefferson, Your municipality is one of over thirty in Colorado with a municipal code that makes it a crime to "loiter for the purpose of begging." Englewood Code of Ordinances§ 7-6B-7(A)(l). This ordinance not only unfairly targets poor and homeless persons whose pleas for assistance are protected by the First Amendment, but it is also legally indefensible. We write to ask that Englewood immediately initiate the steps necessary to repeal the ordinance and take it off the books. While the process of repeal is unfolding, law enforcement should be instructed not to enforce this ordinance. In recent years, this nation and Colorado have seen a marked uptick in enforcement of laws that effectively criminalize homelessness and extreme poverty, including many laws that prohibit individuals from peacefully asking passersby for help.1 Not only do these anti-begging ordinances violate the constitutional rights of impoverished people, but they are costly to enforce and serve to exacerbate problems associated with homelessness and poverty. Harassing, ticketing and/or arresting poor persons for asking for help is inhumane, counterproductive and - in many cases -illegal. That is why the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado ("ACLU") has devoted considerable resources in recent years to reviewing, and sometimes challenging such ordinances. 2 1 See National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty, No Safe Place -The Criminalization of Hom elessness in U.S. Cities (2015), available at http://www .nlchp .org/documents/No Sa fe Place . 2 Following are recent ACLU actions aimed at challenging laws that criminalize peaceful solicitation of charity: • In 2013, Colorado Springs repealed an ordinance establishing a "Downtown No Solicitation Zone" after the ACLU obtained a preliminary injunction. As part of the settlement in that case , Colorado Springs paid the ACLU $110 ,000 in attorneys' fees . • In 2014, in response to a letter from the ACLU, officials in Durango agreed to suspend enforcement of an ordinance that, like the Bennett ordinance, prohibited "lo itering ... for the purpose of begging." The Durango ordinance has now been repealed. 303 E. 17th Avenue , Suite 3 50 *Den ver, CO 80203 *72 0-402-3114 *FAX 303-77 7-1 77 3 * rn sil vcrs tein @aclu -co .org A CL U of Co lorado ... Becau se Freed o m Ca n 't Pro tec t Itself . ' It is well-settled that peacefully soliciting charity in a public place is protected by the First Amendment. See, e.g., United States v. Kokinda, 497 U.S. 720, 725 (1990) ("Solicitation is a recognized form of speech protected by the First Amendment."); accord Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better Env 't, 444 U.S. 620, 632 ( 1980). This constitutional protection applies not just to organized charities, but also to the humblest solitary beggar asking for spare change to get through the day. More than twenty years ago, the Second Circuit explained that begging or panhandling is communicative activity that the Constitution protects: Begging frequently is accompanied by speech indicating the need for food, shelter, clothing, medical care or transportation. Even without particularized speech, however, the presence of an unkempt and disheveled person holding out his or her hand or a cup to receive a donation itself conveys a message of need for support and assistance. We see little difference between those who solicit for organized charities and those who solicit for themselves in regard to the message conveyed. The former are communicating the needs of others while the latter are • In a 2015 ACLU case, a federal judge ruled that Grand Junction's panhandling ordinance violated the First Amendment. Browne v. City of Grand Junction, 136 F . Supp . 3d 1276 (D. Colo. 2015). Grand Junction repealed the ordinance and paid the ACLU $330,000 in attorneys' fees . • Also in 2015, the ACLU filed a class action lawsuit challenging Fort Collins's enforcement of its panhandling ordinance. After legal briefing on the ACLU's motion for a preliminary injunction, Fort Collins repealed all of the challenged provisions. As part of the subsequent settlement, .Fort Collins paid the ACLU $82,500 in attorney's fees. • In the spring of 2015, the ACLU learned that Telluride had approved, on first reading, a new ordinance that regulated panhandling. After receiving a letter from the ACLU, the town council changed course and adopted a scaled-down version that included only four provisions to which the ACLU did not object. • In May 2015, Durango proposed a new panhandling ordinance to replace the repealed ordinance that prohibited "loitering ... for the purpose of begging." The ACLU of Colorado wrote a detailed critique that explained why multiple provisions of the proposed ordinance violated the First Amendment. The Durango Town Council then changed course and settled on a scaled- down version that included only a handful of provisions to which the ACLU did not object. • In July, 2015, Loveland, noting the ACLU's court challenges to the Fort Collins and Grand Junction panhandling ordinances, adopted significant revisions to its panhandling ordinance. Loveland's revised ordinance leaves in place only four provisions to which the ACLU does not object. • In August 2015, in response to a letter from the ACLU, Steamboat Springs agreed to cease enforcement of its ordinance prohibiting loitering for the purpose of begging. A month later, the City repealed the ordinance. • In October 2015, in response to a letter from the ACLU, Colorado Springs dismissed hundreds of panhandling charges against individuals who had been cited for peacefully soliciting charity with a sign. In 2016, the City repealed one of its panhandling ordinances and revised the other to leave in place only those provisions to which the ACLU does not object. Page 2of4 -· communicating their personal needs. Both solicit the charity of others. The distinction is not a significant one for First Amendment purposes. Loper v. New York Town Police Department, 999 F.2d 699, 700 (2d Cir. 1993).3 In the years since the Loper decision, numerous courts have held that various regulations or outright prohibitions of solicitation violate the First Amendment. See, e.g., Norton v. City of Springfield, 806 F.3d 411, 412-13 (7th Cir. 2015) (anti-panhandling statute is content-based and subject to strict-scrutiny); Browne v. City of Grand Junction, 136 F. Supp. 3d 1276, 1287 (D. Colo. 2015) (same); Thayer v. City of Worcester, 144 F. Supp. 3d 218, 233 (D. Mass. 2015) (same); Speet v. Schuette, 726 F.3d 867, 870 (6th Cir. 2013) (invalidating Michigan's anti-begging statute, which "bans an entire category of activity that the First Amendment protects"); Clatterbuck v. City of Charlottesville, 708 F.3d 549 (4th Cir. 2013) (subjecting regulation of solicitation to strict scrutiny); ACLU of Idaho v. City of Boise, 998 F. Supp. 2d 908 (D. Idaho 2014) (issuing preliminary injunction); Kelly v. City of Parkersburg, 978 F. Supp. 2d 624 (S.D. W Va. 2013) (issuing preliminary injunction); Guy v. County of Hawaii, 2014 U.S. Dist. Lexis 132226 (D. Hawaii Sept. 19, 2014) (issuing temporary restraining order). During the litigation of the ACLU's challenge to Grand Junction's panhandling ordinance, the federal district court in Colorado underscored the significance of panhandling' s communicative function: This court believes that panhandling carries a message. Often, a request for money conveys conditions of poverty, homelessness, and unemployment, as well as a lack of access to medical care, reentry services for persons convicted of crimes, and mental health support. The City's attempt to regulate this message is an attempt to restrain the expression of conditions of poverty to other citizens. Browne v. City of Grand Junction, 2015 U.S. Dist. Lexis 73834, **12-13 (D. Colo. June 8, 2015). The Englewood ordinance prohibiting loitering for the purpose of begging is far broader than many of the anti-panhandling regulations that courts have struck down in recent years. It prohibits passively, silently, and nonintrusively sitting with a sign that asks for charity, and it applies everywhere in the municipality. The ordinance could not survive a legal challenge. Indeed, the language of Englewood's loitering ordinance is familiar to our office. In 1996, the ACLU of Colorado filed a class action lawsuit to challenge an antiquated Colorado statute that, like Englewood's ordinance, prohibited "loitering ... for the purpose of begging." After the plaintiffs obtained a preliminary injunction, the defendants agreed to ask the legislature to repeal the statute, and it was repealed in the next legislative session. Through the ACLU's investigation, we know that several jurisdictions have actively enforced this outdated ordinance -whether by means of citations, warnings, or move-on orders. Indeed, of the ten municipalities from which we received records, eight had engaged in some 3 Notably, the New York City ordinance at issue in the Loper decision was very similar to Bennett's. The ordinance provided that a person commits a crime when he "Loiters, remains or wanders about in a public place for the purpose of begging." Loper, 999 F.2d at 701. The court held the ordinance violates the First Amendment. Id. at 706. Page 3of4 form of illegal enforcement of the ordinance within the last few years. We understand, however, that some municipalities may have allowed this unconstitutional ordinance to stay on the books, but have no intention of enforcing it. Your municipality may be one such jurisdiction. Even if that is the case, it is important to remove this archaic law from the municipal code. Leaving the law on the books raises the very real possibility that, at some point in the future, an energetic law enforcement officer will review the entirety of the municipal code and begin enforcing the ordinance. 4 Based on the foregoing, we ask Englewood to take the following immediate actions: 1. Stop enforcing Section 7-6B-7(A)(l). This requires instructing any law enforcement officers charged with enforcing the municipal code that Section 7-6B-7(A)(l) is no longer to be enforced in any way, including by issuance of citations, warnings, or move-on orders. 2. Immediately initiate the steps necessary to repeal Section 7-6B-7(A)(l). 3. If there are any pending prosecutions under Section 7-6B-7(A)(l}, dismiss them. Please provide a written response to this letter by September 14, 2016. Sincerely, ~tJ~ Mark Silverstein Legal Director ACLU of Colorado Rebecca Wallace Staff Attorney & Policy Counsel ACLU of Colorado cc: Dugan Comer, Englewood City Attorney -dcomer@englewoodgov.org 4 Indeed, after at least eight years of non-enforcement of its loitering for the purpose of begging ordinance, the Town of Bennett recently cited a homeless man who was simply soliciting donations with a sign. The municipal court set the case for trial, but our office was able to secure a dismissal after we shared with the prosecuting attorney some of the caselaw cited in this letter. Page 4of4 Oe-tober is CONFLICT RESOLUTION MONTH IN COLORADO Listel'l. Talk. Work it Out. Proclaimed by the Governor and the Colorado State Legislature www.conflictresolutionmonth.org Oe-tubrees MES DE RESOLUCION DE CONFLICTO EN COLORADO Escucha . Habla. Lle9a a MY\ acuerdo. Proclamado por el Gobernador y la Asamblea Legislativa del Estado de Colorado www.conflictresolutionmonth.org I .-OCTOBER IS IN COLORADO PROUD SUPPORTER CONFLICT RESOLUTION MONTH IN COLORADO Listen. Talk. Work it Out. WWW.CONFLICTRESOLUTIONMONTH.ORG CONFLICT RESOLUTION MONTH IN COLORADO ListeYl. Talk. Work it Out. Conflict Resolution Month in Colorado 2015 Summary Proclaimed by Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper And by Joint Resolution of the Colorado Legislature (SJR15-022) WWW.CONFLICTRESOLUTIONMONTH.ORG crmonthco@gmail.com 2015 HIGHLIGHTS: • Over 3,428 People participated. • 50 Activities in 14 Communities across the state were reported. • 23 Proclamations were issued by counties, cities and schools. • Summit County Conflict Resolution Coalition was organized and created a number of activities. • Over 200 copies of Sticking Points: How to get 4 Generations Working Together in the 12 Places They Come Apart were distributed. Little Free Libraries in the Denver area received 25 of the 2015 book selection. Additional conflict resolution books donated by community organizations and practitioners were also distributed. Most of the reported activities were a direct result of the Conflict Resolution Month in Colorado campaign. Other event sponsors planned programs during the October time frame and included them in our web site calendar. Additional events took place without being posted and are not in this summary. 2015 PROCLAMATIONS: • Proclaimed by Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper and by Joint Resolution of the Colorado Legislature (SJR15-022) • Proclamations in Perpetuity: Counties: Clear Creek, Elbert, Jefferson, Pitkin Cities: Arvada, Town of Bow Mar, Carbondale, Centennial, Dillon, Edgewater, Englewood, Golden, Greeley, Greenwood Village, Lakewood, Sheridan Mapleton Public Schools, Adams County School District 1 • 2015 Proclamations, not in perpetuity: State of Colorado Counties: City and County of Denver, Summit Cities: Aurora, Colorado Springs, Estes Park, Montrose 2015 BOOK SELECTION: Each year, Conflict Resolution Month in Colorado selects a book that enhances problem-solving skills and/or inspires dialogue. Every Colorado legislator and the Governor received a copy of the book. Colorado Supreme Court Judges also received copies. Additionally, one hundred forty copies were distributed at conferences and across the state,