HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-01-05 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet1. Call to Order.
2 . Invocation.
3. Pledge of Allegiance.
4. Roll Call .
Agenda for the
Regular Meeting of the
Englewood City Council
Monday, January 5, 2015
7:30 pm
Englewood Civic Center -Council Chambers
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, CO 80110
5. Consideration of Minutes of Previous Session.
a. Minutes from the Regular City Council Meeting of December 15, 2014.
6. Recognition of Scheduled Public Comment. (This is an opportunity for the public to address City
Council. There is an expectation that the presentation will be conducted in a respectful manner.
Council may ask questions for clarification, but there will not be any dialogue. Please limit your
presentation to five minutes.)
7. Recognition of Unscheduled Public Comment. (This is an opportunity for the public to address City
Council. There is an expectation that the presentation will be conducted in a respectful manner.
Council may ask questions for clarification , but there will not be any dialogue. Please limit your
presentation to three minutes. Time for unscheduled public comment may be limited to 45 minutes,
and if limited, shall be continued to General Discussion .)
Council Response to Public Comment.
8. Communications, Proclamations, and Appointments.
Please note: If you have a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City of Englewood
(303-762-2405) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed.
Englewood City Council Agenda
January 5, 2015
Page 2
9. Consent Agenda Items
a. Approval of Ordinances on First Reading.
b. Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading.
i. Council Bill No. 70 (as amended), reducing the number of members of the Keep
Englewood Beautiful Commission to nine and the minimum number of meetings from
monthly to quarterly.
c. Resolutions and Motions.
i. Recommendation from the Public Library to approve a resolution authorizing the 2015
Spring Food for Fines program. Staff Source: Dorothy Hargrove, Director of Library
Services.
ii. Recommendation from the Department of Finance and Administrative Services, City
Clerk's Office, to approve a resolution designating the bulletin board on the north side
of the second floor of the Englewood Civic Center as the Official Posting Place for all
Legal Notices for the City of Englewood for 2015. Staff Source: Frank Gryglewicz,
Director of Finance and Administrative Services and Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk.
iii . Recommendation from the Police Department to approve, by motion, the purchase of a
new unmarked Chevrolet Tahoe police vehicle to replace an older model that has met
its years of service, mileage, and maintenance replacement criteria. Staff recommends
purchasing the vehicle from John Elway Chevrolet through the State of Colorado Fleet
Management bid in the amount of $31, 125. Staff Sources: Gary Condreay, Police
Commander and Pat White, Fleet Manager.
iv. Recommendation from the Department of Parks and Recreation to approve, by motion,
the purchase of a Chevrolet CK3500 pickup truck. Staff recommends purchasing the
vehicle from John Elway Chevrolet through the State of Colorado Fleet Management bid
in the amount of $31,350. Staff Source: Pat White, Fleet Manager and Dave Lee,
Manager of Open Space.
v . Recommendation from the Public Works Department to approve, by motion, the
purchase of a Skid Steer Loader. Staff recommends awarding the contract to Caterpillar
through a GSA (Government Services Administration) contract, in the amount of
$67,723. Staff Sources: Rick Kahm, Director of Public Works, Brad Hagan, Streets
Maintenance Manager, and Pat White, Fleet Manager.
10. Public Hearing Items.
a. A public hearing to gather input on Council Bill No. 69, authorizing amendments to Title 16:
Unified Development Code regarding Official Zoning Map Amendments (Rezoning) and
Planned Unit Developments.
Please note: If you have .a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City of Englewood
(303-762-2405) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed.
.-Englewood City Council Agenda
January 5, 2015
Page 3
b. A public hearing to gather input on Council Bill No. 71, authorizing amendments to Title 16:
Unified Development Code regarding Minimum Lot Width for Multi-Unit Dwellings in the
MU-R-3-B and M-U-R-3-C Zone Districts.
11. Ordinances, Resolutions and Motions.
a. Approval of Ordinances on First Reading.
i. Council Bill No. 1 -Recommendation from the Community Development Department
to adopt a bill for an ordinance authorizing amendments to Title 16: Unified
Development Code regarding Bulk Plane Requirements. Staff further recommends
setting a Public Hearing for January 20, 2015 to consider public testimony on this
matter. Staff Source: Brook Bell, Planner II.
b. Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading.
c. Resolutions and Motions.
12. General Discussion.
a. Mayor's Choice.
b . Council Members' Choice.
13. City Manager's Report.
14. City Attorney's Report.
a. Litigation : Johnson v. Englewood
1 5. Adjournment.
Please note: l.f you have a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City of Englewood
(303-762-2405) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed .
PUBLIC COMMENT ROSTER
AGENDA ITEM 7
UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENT
January 5, 2015
PLEASE LIMIT YOUR PRESENTATION TO THREE MINUTES
PLEASE PRINT
NAME ADDRESS TOPIC
•
•
•
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 2014/2015
BY AUTHORITY
COUNCIL BILL NO. 70
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER McCASLIN
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 2, CHAPTER 8, ENTITLED KEEP ENGLEWOOD
BEAUTIFUL COMMISSION OF THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE 2000.
WHEREAS , the Englewood City Council wishes to reduce the membership of the Keep
Englewood Beautiful Commission (KEB) from fifteen (15) to nine (9) members.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes amending
Title 2, Chapter 8, entitled Keep Englewood Beautiful Commission* of the Englewood Municipal
Code 2000, to read as follows:
2-8-1: Commission Established; Membership and Terms.
There is hereby established a Keep Englewood Beautiful Commission an affiliate of Keep
America Beautiful, Inc. of the City of Englewood, to be of fifieea (15) nine (9) persons to be
appointed by the City Council.
All commission members will be appointed to overlapping terms of two years . The City Council
shall make appointments to fill vacancies for unexpired terms.
2-8-2: Organization and Meetings.
A. In November of every year, the Keep Englewood Beautiful Commission shall select its
chairperson and vice chairperson for a one-year term. The chairperson and vice
chairperson shall be entitled to enter into all discussions of the commission and to vote on
all questions before the commission. The chairperson shall be the presiding officer and
shall have such other and further duties as may be designated by the rules and regulations
of the commission. When the chairperson is absent, the vice chairperson shall serve as the
presiding officer.
B. A simple majority of the duly appointed members of the commission shall constitute a
quorum for the transaction of business . In the absence of a quorum, such members as are
present may adjourn from time to time until a quorum is present.
9 bi
2-8-3: Powers and Duties.
The Keep Englewood Beautiful Commission shall have the following powers and duties:
A. Be advisory to the City Council in all matters pertaining to Keep America Beautiful, Inc.
B. Act as a sounding board of the community and gather and assess the facts and data
necessary to make sound recommendations to the City Council in providing Keep America
Beautiful services. The commission, may form committees made up of commission
members as well as citizens as needed, to research programs that call for extensive time
and discussion. These committees will be advisory only to the commission.
C. Adopt rules and regulations for the conduct of the commission meetings and duties of its
officers and committees.
D. At a minimum meet monthly quarterly.
E. Develop programs and services that increase citizen commitment to and responsibility in issues
relating to waste reduction, environmental protection and
Section 2. Safety Clauses. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this
Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Englewood, that it is
promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public, and that this Ordinance is necessary
for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and
welfare. The City Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the
'proper legislative object sought to be obtained.
Section 3 . Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Ordinance or the
application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjudged by a court of
competent jurisdiction invalid, suchjudgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder
of this Ordinance or it application to other persons or circumstances.
Section 4. Inconsistent Ordinances. All other Ordinances or portions thereof inconsistent or
conflicting with this Ordinance or any portion hereof are hereby repealed to the extent of such
inconsistency or conflict.
Section 5. Effect of repeal or modification. The repeal or modification of any provision of
the Code of the City of Englewood by this Ordinance shall not release, extinguish, alter, modify,
or change in whole or in part any penalty, forfeiture, or liability, either civil or criminal, which
shall have been incurred under such provision, and each provision shall be treated and held as
still remaining in force for the purposes of sustaining any and all proper actions, suits,
proceedings, and prosecutions for the enforcement of the penalty, forfeiture, or liability, as well
as for the purpose of sustaining any judgment, decree, or order which can or may be rendered,
entered, or made in such actions, suits, proceedings, or prosecutions.
Section 6 . Penalty. The Penalty Provision of Section 1-4-1 EMC shall apply to each and
every violation of this Ordinance.
Introduced, read in full, amended and passed as amended on first reading on the 15th day of
December, 2014.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Published by Title as an amended Bill for an Ordinance in the City's official newspaper on the
19th day of December, 2014 .
Published as an amended Bill for an Ordinance on the City's official website beginning on the
17th day of December, 2014 for thirty (30) days.
Read by title on final reading on the 5th day of January, 2015 .
Published by title in the City's official newspaper as Ordinance No._, Series of 2015, on
the 9th day of January, 2015.
Published by title on the City's official website beginning on the 7th day of January, 2015 for
thirty (30) days.
This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after publication following final passage.
Randy P. Penn, Mayor
ATTEST:
Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk
I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by
title as Ordinance No._, Series of 2015.
Loucrishia A. Ellis
• COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Date: Agenda Item: Subject:
January 5, 2015 9 c i Englewood Public Library Food for Fines
Initiated By: Staff Source:
Library Department Dorothy Hargrove, Director of Library Services
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
The Food for Fines program was first sponsored by the Library in 1990 and has long been a tradition for the
Englewood community. The goal today is the same as the original goal: to encourage library patrons to
return overdue books and to provide donations to local food banks to help those in need. For many years,
the Library offered the program every spring and fall, but we discovered that the predictable nature of this
program discouraged people from promptly returning books or paying fines. Consequently, in consultation
with the Library Board, the decision was made to offer the program on a less regular schedule in order to
maximize the benefit both for the Library and for the food banks. While the Board considered offering this
program in late 2014, the consensus was that food banks would appreciate the donations more after the
busy holiday season .
• RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Library Department recommends City Council approve a resolution authorizing the Library Department
to implement a Spring Food for Fines program from Sunday, March 1 through Sunday, March 15, 2015.
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
The Food for Fines program will require the donation of one non-perishable food item for each $5 .00 of
accrued charges. This amount is the maximum accrual for overdue fines for each book. The program will
therefore encourage the return of long overdue items since, with a donation, there will essentially be no
penalty for returning items late. It is important to note that a cardholder cannot check out additional books
if their accrued charges exceed $10.00. Because many of our long-overdue items are children's books, the
Food for Fines program will enable many children and their families to get back in the habit of reading.
The Library Board has recommended that all the food be donated to the Holy Cow Food Bank associated
with the Mosaic Church in Englewood. This organization has indicated that they have the volunteer staff
needed to pick up and distribute the donations. They serve many families in need in the Englewood
community.
This program has been warmly received and supported by the public since its inception, and Library
patrons now look forward to it as a way of helping others while relieving their own financial obligations.
The program presents a positive image of the Library and the City and is a "win-win" situation for everyone
involved .
•
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Food for Fines reduces the General Fund revenue provided by overdue fees . These revenues typically drop
about 50% during a two-week Food for Fines programs, for an estimated loss in revenue of about $600.00.
This is partially offset by the value of returned library materials, reducing the need for purchase of
replacement books and materials. The food donation value would be approximately $1,500 to $2,000.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Proposed Resolution
•
•
•
RESOLUTION NO.
• SERIES OF 2015
•
•
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ENGLEWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY TO
IMPLEMENT THE "2015 SPRING FOOD FOR FINES" PROGRAM FROM SUNDAY,
MARCH 1, 2015 THROUGH SUNDAY, MARCH 15, 2015.
WHEREAS, the Englewood Public Library has sponsored a "Food for Fines" program since
1990;and
WHEREAS, the "Food for Fines" program allows patrons with overdue fines to "pay" them
off through the donation of non-perishable food items; and
WHEREAS, the food items are then forwarded to the Holy Cow Food Bank for distribution to
financially disadvantaged families in the Englewood area; and
WHEREAS, the program is a benefit to the community in that the disadvantaged are assisted;
patrons are able to clear their library account of fines; patrons are encouraged to return overdue
items and hence increase the availability of library materials for the community; and the program
presents a positive image of the Library and the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1. The Englewood City Council hereby authorizes the Englewood Public Library's
implementation of"2015 Spring Food For Fines" program from Sunday March 1, 2015 through
Sunday March 15, 2015. The collected food will then be forwarded to the Holy Cow Food Bank
for distribution to financially disadvantaged families in the Englewood area.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 5th day of January, 2015.
ATTEST:
Randy P. Penn, Mayor
Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk
I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk for the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify the
above is a true copy of Resolution No. __ , Series of 2015 .
Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk
• COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Date Agenda Item Subject
January 5, 2015 9 c ii Designation of Bulletin Board on
the north side of the second floor
of Englewood Civic Center as the
Official Posting Place for all Legal
Notices of the City of Englewood
for 2015 .
INITIATED BY STAFF SOURCE
Department of Finance and Administrative Services Frank Gryglewicz, Director of Finance and
City Clerk's Office Administrative Services
Loucrishia Ell is, City Clerk
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Since 2001 City Council has designated the bulletin board on the north side of the second floor of
Englewood Civic Center as the Official Posting Place for all Legal Notices of the City of Englewood.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
•
Approve a resolution designating the bulletin board on the north side of the second floor of Englewood
Civic Center as the Official Posting Place for all Legal Notices of the City of Englewood for 2015.
•
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
The OPEN MEETINGS LAW, State Statute§ 24-6-402 (2) (c) states that "a local public body shall be
deemed to have given full and timely notice if the notice of the meeting is posted in a designated public
place within the boundaries of the local public body no less than twenty-four hours prior to the holding of
the meeting. The public place or places for posting such notice shall be designated annually at the local
public body's first regular meeting of each calendar year."
FINANCIAL IMPACT
None
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
RESOLUTION NO.
• SERIES OF 2015
•
•
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE BULLETIN BOARD ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
SECOND FLOOR OF THE ENGLEWOOD CIVIC CENTER AS THE OFFICIAL POSTING
PLACE FOR ALL LEGAL NOTICES OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD FOR 2015.
WHEREAS, the "Open Meetings Law", State Statute §24-6-402(2)(c) requires that the public
place or places for posting legal notices shall be designated annually at the local public body's
first regular meeting of each calendar year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1. The official posting place for all legal notices of the City of Englewood for the year
2015, shall be the Bulletin Board on the north side of the second floor of the Englewood Civic
Center and such notices shall be posted under the heading "OFFICIAL CITY NOTICES." This
Resolution does not in any way of itself create a requirement for notice .
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 5th day of January, 2015 .
ATTEST:
Randy P. Penn, Mayor
Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk
I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk for the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify the
above is a true copy of Resolution No. __ , Series of 2015.
Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk
•
•
•
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Date: Agenda Item: Subject:
January 5, 2015 9 c iii Police Vehicle Replacement
Initiated By: Police Department Staff Source:
Gary Condreay, Commander
Pat White, Fleet Manager
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
City Council regularly approves requests for new vehicle replacement.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Police Department is recommending that Council approve, by motion, the purchase of one
2015 Chevrolet Tahoe for use as an unmarked police vehicle. Staff recommends purchase through
a state bid in the amount of $31, 125 .
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
The Police Department and the Public Works Department are working together to facilitate the
replacement of one unmarked police vehicle. The current vehicle is a 2003 GMC Yukon which has
met the replacement criteria of years of service, mileage and maintenance dollars expended.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The Chevrolet Tahoe is available on a state bid for $31, 125.00 which will be paid for through the
existing Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (CERF) account budgeted by the Police Department.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Service Center Garage Summary Specification Sheet for New Vehicles (and related attachments)
•
•
•
SERVICENTER GARAGE
SUMMARY SPECIFICATION SHEET
FOR
NEW VEHICLES
STATE AWARD# __ ...;:.2=0.._.15'""'0"""'00 ..... 0""'"00.....,0 ..... 0=20 ..... 9 ___________ _
MANUFACTUREROFVEHICLE_~C=h=e~vr=o=Je=t-~~~~~~~~~
MODEL OF VEHICLE Tahoe
AIR CONDITIONING YES NO
AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION YES NO
POWER WINDOWS YES NO
POWER DOOR LOCKS YES NO
4 WHEEL DRIVE YES NO
FLEX FUEL OPTION YES NO
CERF REPLACEMENT YES NO
NEW ADDITION TO FLEET YES NO
DEPARTMENT VEHICLE ASSIGNED TO 021105, Police DeQartment
COMMENTS: This unit will re12lace Unit 7382, a 2003 GMC Yukon which has
met the replacement criteria of years of service. mileage. and maintenance dollars
exoended. The cost of the replacement unit. a 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe. is $31.125.00. The
funds are available in the Capital Eguipment Replacement Fund (CERF) .
•
';2 O I$ oooooCOD ;to g
Colorado Stale Fleet Management
2015 VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS
Dealers lnvllatlon to Bid ORIGINAL
Class: SUV 4x4 Bodv Code: .IS! PASS UTIL LARGE, 4X•. PATROL
Reprasenlatlve Models: 1: CHEVROLET TAHOE
3:
2: FORD
4:
EXPEDITION
Page1 of3
81'l7/2014
(of or 'gC
rp\·-av -
OEM MODEL ,?'k/.f70 b TRIM LEVEL: ---OEM CODE: ---
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS: OEM CODE INDICATE ACTUAL DEALER SPECIFICATIONS
,.--~~~~~~~~~~~~~--.
103 PASS: 5 PERSONS MIN.
111 DOORS: 4 FULL SIZE SIDE DOORS
415 FOUR-WHEEL DRIVE
479 PKG: POLICE 4WD UTIUlY(attchmanl)
910 PRIMARY FUEL: UNLEADED
991 STD WANTY· BUMPER TO BUMPER 3136
i -. ----;:--.------------···------
~':...--~-~-=------
AVAILABLE OPTIONS: OEM CODEACTUAL I COMMENTS
216 NON·STD ENGINE OPTION A:. AA; r Aw11.~" 1c::
252 CNG PREP PACKAGE Nt?Y-/lr)4d~I~
254 ALT FUEL· OEM Bl FUEL SPECIFY TANK LOC AQ,,... Av4.i.1.t"11~
255 ALT FUEL· OEM DEDICATED SPEC TANK LOC Aht:.drbd411~
258 E85 • OEM Bl FUEL ~~/1(;14rd'(
286 PUSH BUMBER PB400
287 PUSH BUMP PB4DO WIPBS FENDER PROTECTC
289 DELETE PKG #479
315 SEAT:EXTRA3RD AOW SEAT J"'IF~"'"""/kl. .,-
408 REAR AXLE· ANTI SPIN t;;fi.80
430 PCKG:TOWINGIRCVR HITCH(Atctvntt
444 ENGINE BLOCK HEATER
472 EPACT AFV CREDIT: Speclly
477 DELETE TOW PKG IN PKG 1479
505 RIGHT SPOTLIGHT: RED LENS
507 RIGHT SPOTLIGHT: Q.EAR LENS
528 PACKAGE: LIGHT BAR (altchmt not lnslded)
533 WIRING, ROOF LIGHTING WITH HOLE
604 PUSH BUMPER SETINA 16°
608 HYBRID GAS/ELECTRIC /tl()r:r ~,,.,,~! ~
I
UNDERCOVER LIGHT PKG K7 & KB (attchmt)
676 CONSOLE 7/1J5
883 UGHTBAR INSTALL
PRtcE
--
;:$-39
7.Z9
< "7"5"0 ">
Z'/6
~s_o
'75
"L,.D~
87'?
L'l91
/~'!..
~7f -/Z¥'f
,Zfo
/~/)
Colorado Slate FIHl Manag1m1nl
2015 VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS
Dealers lnvltaUon to Bid
Page 2of 3
1127/2014
Clas~ SUV 4X4 Body Cod1j JSZ PASS UTIL LARGE. 4H PATROL
Aepresentallvl Madtls: 1: CHEVROLET TAHOE
3:
AVAILABLE OPTIONS:
2: FORD
4:
EXPEDITION
OEM MODEL .tttf7t:JJ TRIM LEVEL: ---OEM CODE: ---
OEM COOEACTUAL/ COMMENTS PRICE
tW:•lt:tfzlt :..:.::.:.~:..:.::.:.:~:..=:::..:;::.:~::::::._--1.lf/or'.4-Pa, Id I<-
__ 1"1CJvdµ(. IN 784 DELETE LEFT SPOTLIGHT
795 CLOTH MIDDLE SEAT L
800 FLOOR MATS FRONT ANO REAR
825 REVERSE SENSING SYSTEM
826 CONSOLE BTWN BUCKET SEATS FORD ONLY
827 CENTER CONSOLE INSTALL
828 PA SYSTEM W/SIREN SPEAKER
829 PROGRAM & INSTALL LIGHTING CONTROLLER
982 EXT WARRANTY· POWER TRAIN 51100,000
M.1" Att:J,1_,~/c
~o 19t'
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
--~~~~~~--~~329 ~Ali,.&;" ie
~~'"~'J~/,~~~~~~~~~~~-~--/_..,f,.....
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~---------------------~/ 3 S? 1/1/f/~dt ____ d'~~~~~~~~~~~--~-
•
•
•
•
Colorado Stall Fleet M1nagement
2015 VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS
011lera lnvllatlon lo Bid
ClaSS: SUV 4x.C Body Code : !S! PA§S um. LARGE, 4X4. PATRQL
RapresentaUve Madlls: 1: CHEVROLET TAHOE
3: -
2: FORD
4:
EXPEDmON
Pagt3 Of3
B/27/2014
MAKE: l./i 2'. v y MODEL: I A /fO f, OEM MODEL 1:t/<.f f3j{;' TRIM LEVEL: ---OEM COD!: ---
AVAILABLE COLORS: Please attach manufacturer color chart
OTHER VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS I OPTIONS (Please allath separal• shut If necessary)
STANDARD FACTORY WARRANTY (Attach datanad dawlptlon):
MILES
Bumper to Bumpar .3lo/L
D!MtTraln 1 or>k
OPTIONAL FACTOAV WARRANTY (Allach dalaDad descripllon):
MILES MONTHS PRICE
• 6ti.Vflz.4b iJeTlotl~ A k.~ AV lriU-tM.:~. /OlZT.~Z. C.OJ.rt-t--1' b ~t.lL izt::..
EPA FUS. RATING: _ __.._/_b __ M.P.G CITY, M.P.G HIGHWAY -----zz.
OEM MINIMUM FUEL RATED OCTANE:-..· ___ ?._'S _______ _
DEUVERY:~"'1:>( ~AYS FROM DEALER RECEIPT OF ORDER FROM STATE (E.G. 90 DAYS)
IDENTIFY AN'f EXCEPTIONS TO SPECIFICATIONS :
PRICE
DEALERNm~_U __ a~H_,J_f_L.W. __ ~~~~a .............. ~---+r--~
DEAl.ER PHONE:_X~1 q_,__..-f2;...ail,:;,,as{p'-'-f ._.{ Q._t,,___ __
BIDDER'S N~__.M....;........:A .... k_k_.M ___ c-'-M""'"'W.........,..J .... 1..J ___ _
SIGNATURE: -&b--...(t}_ ....... /11_._..fttl....__~==="'--
•
Paga5of52
Colorado state Purchasing Office (per SFM)
LIST AND EXPLANATIONS OF VEHICLE PACKAGES
FOR THE 2015 MODEL YEAR FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSALS
#430 -PACKAGE: OEM TOWING OPTION
Attach one copy of this form to each body code specification sheet that has an Available
Option #430 including the following body codes:
C2,C3,C4,D1,D2,03,D5,D8,E2,E3,E4,E8,F2,F3,F4,F8,G3,H3,K1,K2,K3,K5,K6,
T1,T4, T5
/vi installed OEM TOWING OPTION PACKAGE should include the foUowing:
• Frame mounted receiver hitch with a class 3 (class 4 for T1, T 4, TS} rating that accepts
a 2" square receiver
• Heavy duty engine cooling
• Transmission cooling (automatic only)
• Trailerwiring harness
• HD tum signal flasher
• Handling package (descnbe: ---------------
• HD battery and Alternator.
• Price to include complete installation.
• All items to be covered at a minimum by the 3 year 36,000 mile factory warranty
Please list additions and/or deletions to your company's OEM TOWING OPTION package from
the above listed specs:
Total Price for OEM TOWING PACKAGE:
FQrBody
Code: I l<7
Total Price for T1 -OEM TOWING j
PACKAGE: $ '--------....J
•
•
•
•
•
•
PACKAGES, PAGE 1 of 28
#479 -PACKAGE: POLICE 4WD UTILTIY
MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS FOR 2015 MODEL YEAR FULL-SIZE, BODY CODE K7 4-DR,
4WD, UTIL TIY PATROL VEHICLES
2015 V-8, full-size, 4-door, 4 Wheel drive, utility type PPV 9C1 OEM Certified Police vehicle:
Chevrolet Tahoe CK10706:
SPECIFICATIONS
Como~· ( cjrcle Y or N)
Air Bags: Q?N Frontal and side-impact for driver and front passenger, driver inboard
seat-mounted side-impact and head curtain side-impact for all rows in
-outboard seating positions.
Air Conditioning : WN Factory-installed air conditioning with Tri-zone manual climate control -with auxiliary rear air conditioning and heat operated from the front only
Alternator System : ~N 170-amp with Idle boost controlled by energy level sensing
Assist steps: c r/N Black running boards on both sides.
Auxiliary Power, c ~N 110-amp main power supply wiring at instrument panel and trunk cargo
Front (6J1): area .
Battery: lll N Dual heavy duty maintenance free batteries, minimum of 660 CCA with
rundown protection .
Bluetooth (QN Bluetooth ceU phone connectivity
Brakes: c C!N Heavy-duty 4-wheel anti-lock brake system with VAC power.
Console Delete: C:C)N Delete OEM center console {9N5)
Console: OJ N Must be Kerr Industries Package -KON18 Console includes mounting
platform (Floor plate and leg kit}. KON-CUA cu~holder. KON-PWR -
3 outlet power plug (12 volt) ~• IJ /<.tl"I' -r '11Pr f'"~;pt\ .knr
Cooler, Engine Oil: '.) N a Auxiliary engine oil cooler. (KC4)
Cooler, C9 N External air-to-oil transmission oil cooler. (KNP)
Transmission Oil: -Cooling System: N Heavy duty high capacity radiator and cooling system, electric fans and
extended life coolant. Hoses are EPDM rubber. -
Cruise Control: C!.)N Electronic cruise control system with tilt steering wheel.
Defroster, Rear Cf) N Electric rear window defroster I defogger.
Window: -Daytime Running (!)N Delete daytime running lights and automatic headlights.
Lights (9G8): -J<~'f..l.(.e~<
Differential: ('() N Axle Ratio to be 3.42 to 1.
Dome lamps CljN Cargo lamp with delayed entry feature and map lamps
Door, Rear. ('(JN Full lift up door with lift up glass.
Engine: (Y )N 5.3L Eco Tec3 VS, with active fuel management
Flasher system (!_1N SEO 6J7 Headlight flasher module with control wire and body control
6J7 : module rear lamp flashing. -
Floor Covering: CY) N Carpeting (930)
Frame: l(Y) N Heavy Duty Frame
l
• PACKAGES, PAGE 2 of 28
Gauges: CP N Tachometer, on pressure, and engine temperature and fuel gauges
mounted in dash in normal positions.
Gnlle Lamp, Siren (!) N Wiring package SEO 6J3
&Speaker .
Hom/siren wiring: (VN SEO 6J4 Connection of a switch to select either horn or siren operation
-when the horn pad is pressed.
Lighting Controller !<:!} N Whelen CanTrol siren and lighting control system. System to include a
remote mounted photo cell that will be direct wired to the CanTrol
inputs as per CSP/Whelen specs. CanTrol system to have interface
cable pre wired from the rear of the vehicle to the console area for the
CANCTL 1 control head to be attached. Part number CanTrol
CANWC1 w/ Control Head# CANCTL 1, Photo Cen part
number CANLITEB -
Lighting Package -(VN Must be Kerr Industries Package -KCRN-LED front and rear comer
4 comer strobes: strobes installed in front head lamps & rear tall lamps of vehicle. Front
-to be white and rear to be red
Lighting Package Q') N Must be Kerr Industries Package -KGRIL-LEDRB Front facing red
Grille Lamps: and blue lamps located behind grille just below the Chevrolet emblem
on the lo~ portion oihe grill to noz covered up by the push
bumoer. AJl<,,fr / l~Ji~/ 'tMt K~I'./'
Locking System: CUN Single key locking system (different key for each vehicle). Remote
-keyless entry (AMF) • Locks, Power: £Y N Power door locks controHed from driver's and passenger position, rear
door handles to remain operational. Inside rear door handles
inoperative, Inside rear door locks Inoperable (6N6)
Luggage Rack Cf) N Delete roof top luggage rack.
Delete:
Mirrors, Outside <:!) N Heated left and right outside mirrors, adjustable with remote control.
Heated: Manual folding.
Molding, body side: WN Installed
Power Outlets CVN Two located on instrumental panel and one in rear cargo area.
Radio AM/FM: (Y t N OEM AM/FM/CO Racfio
Radio Suppression ()_ ) N Grounding straps at five locations. (UN9)
Seats: CQN Heavy duty front bucket cloth seats. The 21111 row seat to be made of
-vinyl. No third row seating.
Siren Speaker: CJN Must be Kerr Industries Package-KSPEAK-A 100-watt siren speaker
installed behind the vehicle grille. Wning connections are weather proof
Sirius XM (U2J): CVN Delete SiriusXM satellite Radio
Speedometer: Cf/N 120 MPH certified analog, 1 mph increments digital trip odometer.
Spotlight ~N One, driver's-side spot Hght, cowl or post mounted, 5" in diameter.
Head to be mounted on door pillar in such a manner as to provide
adequate clearance from steering wheel in all positions of spotlight and
tilt steering wheel. White lens to have a minimum of 160,000 candle-
power. Unity 94012-0002 with sealed beam bulb, or equivalent. Dealer
installed •
2
•
•
•
PACKAGES, PAGE 3 of 28
-
Stabilltrak: C_ () N Stability enhanced system.
Steering: { Cl N Heavy-duty power operated steering system.
Suspension C!) N Heavy duty, police rated, independent torsions bar, and stabifizer bar
System: and rear multi-link with coil springs.
Theft Deterrent CUN Vehicle theft PASS-key Ill+
Tires and Wheels: (!JN Five heavy-duty 11• steel wheels and five "V rated" tires (P265/60R17)
BSW all-season tires. Tire pressure monitoring system.
Tire carrier-Spare: (J '1 N Lockable outside spare, winch type mounted under frame at rear.
Trailer Tow f!) N Includes trailering hitch platform, 7 wire harness with independent
Package: fused trailering circuits mated to a 7-way sealed connector, VR4 2-inch
trailering receiver and electric brake controller jumper harness.
Transmission: c 'I N Heavy-duty minimum of 6-speed automatic transmission with overdrive.
Windows, Power: IC ON Power windows, rear Inside switch inoperable SEO (6N5)
Windshield Wipers: r 0 N Front and rear Intermittent windshield wiper system.
Wiring provisions (!) N Blunt cut ends for alternating signal flasher, for grille lamps and
for Grille lamps and siren/speaker. Control wires from In-line connector In forward lamp
siren SEO 6J3 : harness for grille lamps and speaker.
Wiring Special: <!JN RGSBAU coaxial radio antenna cable to extend from the roof to the left
side of the trunk compartment with at least six inches of cable to be left
readily accessible. An auxiliary battery power stud shall be furnished
allowing for electrical connections of additional equipment. MMNStar
Wiring EDH50 Installer utility hamess system•. Fused grounds for
these circuits are also to be Included. DEALER INSTALLED
THE WARRANTY IS TO GO INTO EFFECT ON THE DATE THE VEHICLE IS PUT INTO
SERVICE, NOT THE PURCHASE DATE. END USER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
NOTIFING THE MANUFACTURER OF THE IN SERVICE DATE.
Delivery to be made to the Colorado State Patrol at 15203 W. 12th Ave., Golden, CO 80401.
Per State Fleet Management instructions.
OTHER
Please list a description of any additions and/or deletions to
your factory's POLICE PACKAGE from the above listed specs or list
next to th~_.!.temd?re~!I,._on tj1.e atta;::jled sheets described above: ~ qf}A(k<L ~7HA h!<!Vn Nrr .
Body Code: /{" 7
ATTACH A COPY OF THIS FORM TO THE "DEALER'S INVITATION TO BID" FOR
BODY CODE K7 WHICH HAS OPTION PACKAGE #479.
Since this Package is part of the Standard $pecification
for body code K7, the total cost for this package must
be included in the "Standard Vehicle Base Price" as
listed on pg l of the Vehicle Specs for this body code .
3
Colorado State Bid
Colorado State Bid
Tue 9/23/2014 12 :59 PM
From: Brad Baker
To: mmcmunn@elwaydealers.net
·-·-·--.. -··--·--.. -·--·--.... ·-···"""-------·-··--·-·---
Mark,
Page 1of1
Per your request to Aly attached please find our proposed pricing for the Colorado State bid. Please note that we have
limited our pricing to specific Kerr options and have not responded to all Items listed In the State bid. We have researched
our records as well as the Information provided by the State and we have found over the course of many years very few
Kerr options have ever been purchased by the State or an other agency piggy backing on the State bid.
We have Informed the State of our decision to reduce our product offering and all dealers requesting our pricing for this
bid are being provided with the same limited number of Kerr options.
Many thanks, If you have ay questions please don 't hesitate to contact me .
Brad Baker
Kerr Industries
Oshawa -Texas -California
800-585-1774
Attachments:
• 2015 ·Tahoe DC.pdf
• 2015 ·Impala DC.pdf
• 2015 ·Caprice DC.pdf
, ......... n ...• :·1 .1 •..••. '. -1 ......... ,. •-!-1.c__" "------n..!_ ... _____ ,.,_ --··----·-O--------: ..1-1 ""'" o.c "'""A 1"1n1 A
•
•
•
•
•
•
Page3Sof52
Colorado State Purchasing Office (per SFM)
LIST AND EXPLANATIONS OF VBilCLE PACKAGES
FOR THE 2015 MODEL YEAR FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSALS
#528 -Packaae Light Bar
Attach one copy of this form to each body code specification sheet that has an Available Option #528 in
the following body codes:
AS, A7, AS, E2, F2, J4, lt2, K7, KB
Bid equipment for vehicle model being bid.
The LIGHT BAR PACKAGE must include the following:
• (Non-OEM) Whelen Liberty 2 Model IWBCSP1
o FRONT (Driver-Passenger)
• RED Linear 12 diode LED comer module, RED Linear 6 diode LED outboard
module, RED Linear-6 diode LED inboard module, (2) 12 Diode LED Take
Down Lights, BLUE Linear-6 diode LED jnboard module, BLUE Linear-6 diode
LED outboard module, BLUE Linear-12 diode LED comer module.
o REAR (Driver-Passenger);
• RED Linear 12 diode LED comer module, RED Linear 6 diode LED outboard
module, RED Linear-6 diode LED inboard module, RED Linear 6-diode LED
inboard module, Blue Linear 6-diode LED inboard module, BLUE Linear-6 diode
LED inboard module, BLUE Linear-6 diode LED outboard module, BLUE
Lincar-12 diode LED comer module
o SIDES (Driver-Passcner)
• Single 3-LED Vertical LED Alley Light Modules
• Lenses
a All lenses shaft be clear In color
• Mounting kit
o Mounting kit to match vehicle application from bid award-Mounting brackets for the AS,
A 7 and AB are to be powder coated Black.
• Delivery
o Light bar to be delivered in factory shipping box and placed in the trunk of the new
vehicle when delivered to Colorado State Patrol Garage (No Installation).
If bidding equal, must have exact configuration of the above light bar to provide uniform appearance
and functionality.
List the make and model of Light Bar that is bid:
Make Wk,07 Model Lfltl'1j 2 jWS CTI' I
List any additions and/or deletions of your bid from the LIGHT BAR PACKAGE spec's listed above:
Total Price for PACKAGE: LIGHT BAR: $ • .tyf f For Body Code Kf
Page38of52
Colorado State Purchasing Office (per SFM)
LIST AND EXPLANATIONS OF VEHICLE PACKAGES
FOR THE 2015 MODEL YEAR FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSALS
#663 -Undercover Lighting Package
Attach one copy of this form to each body code specification sheet that has an Available
Option #663 in the following body codes:
J4, K2, K7, KB
Bid equipment for vehicle model being bid.
The UNDERCOVER LIGHTING PACKAGE must include the following:
• (Non-OEM) Whelen Model Inner Edge Front:
IW34UFX -Interceptor Utility, IW45UFX -Tahoe, IWOBUFX -Expedition, IW44UFX -
Durango
• Front lnner-Edqe(Driver-Passenger}
o Red LED module X4, takedown module X2, blue LED module X4
o No "one-way Mirrored housing on driver side.
• (Non-OEM) Whelen Traffic Advisor T AZ86RB Rear:
Same model for all 3 vehicle types
• Rear lnner-Edge(Driver-Passenger)
o Red LED Warning module, AMBERT/A module X6, Blue warning module .
•
o TIA to function separately from Red/Blue light and plug directly into the •
CanTrol CANWC1 w/ Control Head # CANCTL 1.
• Mounting kit
o Mounting kit to match vehicle application from bid award
• Delivery
o Lighting and siren/lighting/traffic advisor to be delivered in factory shipping box
and placed in the trunk of the new vehicle when delivered to Colorado State
Patrol Garage (No Installation}.
If bidding equal, must have exact configuration of the above light bar to provide uniform
appearance and functionality.
List the make and model of Lighting Package that is bid:
Make __ N,-"---i,..;...~...;..l~/l"---___ Model ___._/_!lfl___._'{_~_l'.-"_~_)( __ _
Make ----'M:;,.....;;;._rh_t_/-t'J_l" ____ Model _=?A~=-Z-...:..:fi--..t_fl_.._~--
List any additions and/or deletions of your bid from the UNDERCOVER LIGHTING PACKAGE
spec's listed above:
Total Price for UNDERCOVER LIGHTING PACKAGE: $ /2 ¥9
For Body Code -/<jZ-· •
• COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Date: Agenda Item: Subject:
January 5, 2015 9 c iv Purchase of Chevrolet 3500 Truck for Parks
Initiated By: Staff Source:
Department of Parks and Recreation Pat White, Fleet Manager
Dave Lee, Manager of Open Space
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
A City that provides and maintains quality infrastructure. Council has previously approved trucks for use by
the Parks Department as part of the normal fleet rotation under the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund
(CERF).
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends City Council award, by motion, a bid to purchase a Chevrolet CK3500 pickup truck from
John Elway Chevrolet through the State of Colorado Price Agreement.
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
•
This vehicle will replace Unit 5244, a 2008 Ford F-250 that has met the replacement criteria in years of
service, mileage and maintenance dollars expended. The department has requested that the vehicle be
upgraded to a 1 ton truck from a % ton truck due to changes in towing operation. This unit is also
equipped with a plow for snow remov al.
•
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Funds are available in the 2015 Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (CERF) for the purchase of the truck.
The total cost for the truck, including the upgrade, is $31 ,350.00. The Parks and Recreation Department will
pay for the $1,000.00 cost of the upgrade from the Open Space Fund.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Summary Specification Sheet
State of Colorado Price Agreement
Colorado State Fleet Management 2015 Vehicle Spe c ifications
•
•
•
SERVICENTER GARAGE
SUMMARY SPECIFICATION SHEET
FOR
NEW VEHICLES
STATEAWARD#~~;20=1=5=00=0=00=0=0=02=0~9~~~~~~~~~~~
MANUFACTUREROFVEHICLE~__,C=h=e~vr=ol=et,__~~~~~~~~~
MODEL OF VEHICLE CK3500
AIR CONDITIONING YES NO
AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION YES NO
POWER WINDOWS YES NO
POWER DOOR LOCKS YES NO
4 WHEEL DRIVE YES NO
FLEX FUEL OPTION YES NO
CERF REPLACEMENT YES NO
NEW ADDITION TO FLEET YES NO
DEPARTMENT VEHICLE ASSIGNED TO 021305 Parks Department
COMMENTS: This vehicle will replace Unit 5244. a 2008 Ford F 250 that has met
the replacement criteria in years of service. mileage, and maintenance dollars expended.
The department has requested that the vehicle be upgraded to a 1 ton truck from a 31.. ton
due to changes in operation. This unit is eguipped with a snow plow. The total cost is
$31.350.00 and the funds are available in the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund
CCERFl and the department will be paying $1.000.00 for the upgrade .
12/16/2014 8:05:04 AM
•
Agreement#: 201500000000209 State of Colorado Price Agreement
Clasalflcatlon:
Status: Current
Duration of Agreement
Period Covered: Options:
Nov 21, 2014 To Sep 30, 2015 Option to Renew for o More Year(s)
Category:
Vehicles
Commodity Code: 07000
Commodity
Description: AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLES AND RELATED TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT
• Ordering/Contact Information
• How To Order/Agreement Prices
• Vendor Insurance Certificate Expiration Dates
.., Additional Attachments
Flln:
•
appllcation/pdf 473 KB John Elway AS Chevy lmpala.pdf
appllcatlon/pdf 559 KB John Elway K7 Chevy Tahoe .pdf
appllcatlon/pdf 466 KB John Elway Chevrolet C1 Chevy City Express .pdf
application/pd! 433 KB John Elway Chevrolet C3 Chevy Express.pdf
appllcatlon/pdf 366 KB John Elway Chevrolet 03 Chevy Express.pdf
applicatlon/pdf 398 KB John Elway Chevrolet 05 Chevy Express.pdf
applicalion/pdf 630 KB John Elway Chevrolet F3 Chevy Silverado.pdf
applicatlon/pdf 576 KB John Elway Chevrolet F4 Chevy Sllverado .pdf
appNcallon/pdf 543 KB John Elway Chevrolet H3 Chevy Silverado pdf
appllcation/pdf 312 KB John Elway Chevrolet K5 Chevy Tahoe.pdf
> Conditions Of Agreement
•
Department of Personnel and Administration
State Purchaalng Office
1525 Shennan Street 3rd floor
Denver, CO 80203
Amy Risley at (303) 866-5663
emaM : amy.risley@state .co .us
Page 1 of 1
Colomlo Slata FIHt Manag1111•nt
2011 VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS
Dealer• Invitation to Bid
• Class: PJU • 41C4 Body Code; F4 1T4X1IBUCK
RlptaHnlatl'I• Models: 1: CHEVROLET 3500 PU
3: RAM 3500 PU
2: FORD
4;GMC
ORIGINAL
F350PU
3500PU
Peg• 1 of4
MAK&t:!J.,/Vf MODE~VJ. ,.,,.~ O!M MODEL~S-f#.J TRIM LEVEL: OEM CODE; , ------
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS:
r-~--------------~~-------..
101 PASS: 3 PERSONS MIN .
110 DOORS: 2 SIDE DOORS
121 LONGBED
140 TIRES: AU.SEAS M&S RADIAL
146 FULL SIZE SPARE TIRE
183 WHEELBASE: 131.0 IN. MIN
187 ENG MIN CVL: 8
200 ENG MIN DISP: 5.4L
226 FUEL TANK: 30 GAL MIN
280 SINGLE REAR WHEELS
300 AIR CONDITIONING -R134a
302 RADIO: AM/FM
307 POWER BRAKES & POWER STEERING
308 ABS BRAKES
310 SEATS: a.OTH SEATS
321 FLOORING: RUBBER
340 A!R BAG • DRIVER SIDE
<COO MIRRORS: RIGHT AND LEFT
404 INTERMITTENT WIPERS
410 TRANSMISSION: AUTOMATIC
415 FOUR·WHEEL DRIVE
418 AUTOMATIC LOCKING FRONT HUBS
436 HEAVY DUTY COOLING
458 STEP BMPR-4DOITONGUE,4DDOITRLR
880 GVW RATING: HOO MIN
752 AXLE RATIO: SPECIFY
910 PRIMARY FUSL: UNLEADED
191 STD WANTY· BUMPER TO BUMPER 3138
OEM CODE INDICATE ACTUAL DEALER SPECIFICATIONS
-----~ ------___ .-==-: __ -_-_ I
•
Colorado Slllll FIHt Man1191m1nt
20111 VEHfCLE SPECIFICATIONS
DNlen1 tnvlt.Uon to Bid
Page 2 of 4
112112014
Class: Pl\J • 414 9oc1y Codi; f! 1T4X4!RUCK
2: FORD
4:GMC
R1pmenlettve Models: 1: CHEVAOlET 3500 PU
3: RAM 3500 PU
F350 PU
3SOOPU
MAKE: "C...1~--#--MDD!l:J;/v,'1f,al) OEM MODEL f:~.eJ!1"1TRIM LEVEL: ---OEM CODE: ---
AVAILABLE OPTIONS:
097 CREW CAB (4 DOORS): SPECIFY CA
098 EXT CAB LONG BED 3 OR 4 DOOR
OH EXT CAB SHORT BED 3 OR 4 DOOR
122 SHORT BED
133 BACK UP Al.ARM
141 TIR!S:ALL·TEAAAIN, UST SIZE:
143 TIRES: OPTION 11, t.IST SIZE:
152 SPILT BENCH 40l20/40 FUU. CONSOLE
218 NON-STD ENGINE OPTION A!
217 ENG OPTION: DIESEL
21 B NON·STO ENGINE OPTION 8:
2211 HEAVY DUTY SUSPENSION SPECIFY TYPE:
239 OVW OPTION: SPECIFY
244 AXLE RATIO (MIN.) 4,10
249 AXLE RATIO OPTION: SPECIFY
252 CNG PREP PACKAGE
254 ALT FUB. •OEM Bl FUEL SPECIFY TANK LOC
255 ALT FUEL· OEM DEDICATED SPEC TANK LOC
258 E85 •OEM Bl FUEL
261 DUAL REAR WHEELS
268 CUSTOM CLOTH SEAT W/CNTR ~SOLE STRG
2M REMOTE l<EYLESS ENTRY
298 CRUISE CONTROlJTILT
311 SEATS: VINYL SEATS
401 MRRS:RECICMPR FOR TWNG (7".V)
408 REARAXLE·ANTISPIN
411 TRANSMISSION: MANUAL W/OVERDAV
420 BEDUNER•FULL MOLDED+ TAILGATE
423 TOOL BOX ·ACROSS BED BOX(attachmenl)
424 TOOL BOX· SIDE BED BOX(attachmtlnl)
429 TRAILER BRAK! CONTROL·ELECTAIC
430 PCl<G:TOWINGIRCVR HITCH(Alctlmt)
432 TOW HOOKS
438 PACKAGE:SNOW PLOW (attctunl)
439 OEM SNOW PLOW PREP
OEM COOEACTUAL/ COMMENTS PRICE
--
370
_/L/ ----------~
~r-:-:-;,.a---------:
V}V ~
•
•
•
Colorado 8ta'8 FIHt M1nag•m•nt
2015 VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS
Dealera lnvlt.tlon to Bid • Class: PIU • 4x4 Body Codt; f! 1 T4X4TRUCK
2: FORD
<l;GMC
Aeprnenlallve Mod9ll: 1: CHEVROLET 3500 P\J
•
3: RAM 3500 PU
AVAILABLE OPTIONS:
4<10 PACKAGE:OFF FIOAD (Attachmenl)
443 PKG: STROSE LIGHT (Attachment)
444 ENGINE BLOCK HEATER
450 SKID PLATE-FUEL TNl<,TAFR CSIDI
451 STEERING WHEEL CONTROLS
454 AU>CILARY BATTERY
482 GOOSENECK HITCH (attchml)
488 SPRAY IN BEDl.INEA
472 EPACT A'FV CREDIT: Speclly
516 LEFT DOOR POST SPOTLIGHT (SOW)
520 POWER LOCKS
529 POWER MIRRORS
530 POWER WINDOWS
541 DELETE DAYTIMEIAUTO HEADLIGHTS
599 AMIFM CD PLAYER .
608 HYBRID GASIEl.ECTRIC
620 UPPER TRIM LEVEL PKG: SPECIFY
M3 ADO DAYTIME RUNNING LIGHTS
893 MEETS 2010 FCD EMISSIONS DIESEL ENG
&IM DIESEL ENG B20 COMPLIANT
783 PHEV (PLUG IN HYBRID ELEC VEH)
780 UPFllTER SWITCHES
982 EXTWARRANTV • POWEATRAIN 51100,000
F350PU
3500PU
OEM CODEACTUAL f COMMENTS
Page 3 014
812112D14
OEM CODE:
PFllCE
_$"60
J2S'
~ZJ
~
/~f
~ -
~'20
~
= ~~
SP
e'~D --
Colorado Stata Fltet M•na11em1nt
2015 VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS
De1l1r1 ln11l111Uon to Bid
Class: PIU • 4x4 Body Code: f! 1 I4X1J8UCK
2: FORD
4:GMC
RepresentaUve Models: 1: CHEVROLET 3500 PU
3: RAM 3500 PU
F350PU
3500PU
1112112014
MAJ<E:/!J.lfY\' MODEL: $fll/?tz4m OEM MODEi. i: eJ43S':J?~TRIM L!Vl!L: ---OEM CODE: ----
AVAILABLE COLORS: Pl•BN allach manufacturer color chert
OTHER VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS I OPTIONS (Pl•u• altach uparate 1heet If nlCllUIY)
STANDARD FACTORY WARRANTY (Attach detalled dacrtptlon):
MILES MONTHS
B11np1r ta Bumper .3b{{. $~
Oril/1 Tniln ~o
Other
OPTIONAL FACTORY WARRANTY (Attach dalallad descrlpllon):
MILES MONTHS PRICE
.!bLt:ML. oen$ !tie: AVAi~ fl.:£.Af>!:-'12""1lT Dt,M.,,'i;,k. .
EPA FUEL RATING: tf/11 M.P.GCITY, M.P.G HIGHWAY -----
OEM MINIMUM FUEL RATED OCTANE .... : ___ s_s _________ _
DB.IVERY/f/f~ ~AVS FROM DEAlEA RECEIPT OF ORDER FROM STATE (E.G. 80 DAYS)
IDENTIFY AMY EXCEPTIONS TO SPECIFICATIONS:
oEALERNAMEUGW 1'.wAv Wt Y~
DEALER PHONE: 3-f'"l ~IP~ 1f5 f
PRICE
•
•
•
•
•
•
Page3of52
Colorado State Purchasing Office (per SFM)
LIST ANO EXPLANATIONS OF VEHICLE PACKAGES
FOR THE 2015 MODEL YEAR FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSALS
#423 • PACKAGE: TOOLBOX· ACROSS BED BOX
Attach one copy of this form to each body code specification sheet that has an Available
Option #423 including the following body codes:
E1,E2,E3,E4,E8,F1 1 F2,F3,F4,F8
An Installed TOOLBOX -ACROSS BED BOX PACKAGE should Include the following:
• Delta brand or equivalent
• Either a gull-wing, double lid QI: chest-style, full-hinged, single lid crossover toolbox
• Painted white with all steel construction
• Torsion bar lift on lid(s)
• Removable tray
· • Weather stripping around lld{s)
• A lock on each lid with key
• Price to Include complete installation.
Total Price for TOOL BOX -ACROSS BED BOX PACKAGE:
• A gull-wing, double lid, tool box:
• a chest-style, full-hinged, single lid crossover toolbox:
For Body
Code: I f~LI I
Colorado State Purchasing Office (per SFM)
LIST AND EXPLANATIONS OF VEHICLE PACKAGES
FOR THE 2015 MODEL YEAR FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSALS
Page4af52
#424 -PACKAGE: TOOL BOX -SIDE BED
Attach one copy of this form to each body code specification sheet that has an Available
Option #424 including the following body codes:
E1,E2,E3,E4,EB,F1,F2,F3,F4,F8
An installed TOOLBOX • SIDE BED PACKAGE should include the following :
• Delta brand or equivalent
• A quantity of one, side-bed, wheel-well, utility, tool box
• Toolbox must rest inside, on the floor of the pickup bed and fit over the wheel well .
• Extending length of pickup bed
• Painted white with all steel construction
• A Jock on the lid with key
• . Removable tray
• Weather stripping around lid
• Price to include complete installation, rearward of an optional across bed box.
Total Price for 48" TOOLBOX -SIDE BED
PACKAGE:
Total Price for 60 11 TOOLBOX -SIDE BED
PACKAGE:
For Body
Code:
$1 ?~CJ
$1 3b3
•
•
•
•
•
•
Page5ofS2
Colorado State Purchasing Office (per SFM)
LIST ANO EXPLANATIONS OF VEHICLE PACKAGES
FOR THE 2015 MODEL YEAR FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSALS
#430 -PACKAGE: OEM TOWING OPTION
Attach one copy of this form to each body code specification sheet that has an Available
Option #430 including the following body codes:
C2, C3, C4, 01, 02, D3, 05, 08, E2, E3, E4, EB, F2, F3, F4, FB, G3, H3, K1, K2, K3, K5, K6,
T1,T4,T5
An Installed OEM TOWING OPTION PACKAGE should include the following:
• Frame mounted receiver hitch with a class 3 (class 4forT1, T4, TS) rating that accepts
. a 2" square receiver
• Heavy dufy engine cooling
• Transmission cooling (automatic only)
• Trailer wiring harness
• HD tum signal flasher
• Handling package (descnbe: ---------------
• HD battery and Alternator .
• Pnce to include complete installation.
• All items to be covered at a minimum by the 3 year 36,000 mile factory warranty
Please list additions and/or deletions to your company's OEM TOWING OPTION package from
the above listed specs:
Total Price for OEM TOWING PACKAGE: $ I
Fi;>rBody
Code: I £'! I
Total Price for T1 -OEM TOWING J
PACKAGE: $ '----------'
Colorado State Purchasing Office (per SFM)
LIST AND EXPLANATIONS OF VEHICLE PACKAGES
FOR THE 2015 MODEL YEAR FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSALS
Page6of52
#438 -PACKAGE: SNOW PLOW
Attach one copy of this form to each body code specification sheet that has an Available
Option #438 including the following body codes:
F3,F4,H3,T1,T4,T5
An installed snow plow package should include the following:
• Meyer Standard Series Snowplow model #ST 7.5 or equivalent f,J 112 foot blade).
• To be installed on a full size, 4WD pickup (Ford, Chevy or Dodge) with a minimum GVVV
rating of 8500 lbs
• The plow mounting kit used must be specifically designed for use on this vehicle.
• Must have dual batteries with isolator as a power source for the plow.
• Either an all-steel moldboard Q! a polymer moldboard with a high carbon steel cutting edge
blade.
• Quick disconnect of front-end hardware, lights, and hydraulic unit
• Hydraulic powered lift with electric, solenoid operated controls inside the cab that will allow
the plow to be angled from side to side and lifted up and down.
• Additional headlights and directional lights above the plow. Must be a vibration free
installation connecting to either the bumper or the plow hitch.
• Price to include complete installation.
• Audible back up alarm (light bulb type acceptable)
• Includes standard factory warranty of at least one year parts/labor
Specify how normal use of snow plow will not cause vehicle air bag to be engaged:
Please list additions and/or deletions to your company's SNOW PLOW PACKAGE from the
above listed specs:
Total Price for SNOW PLOW package with all steel
moldboard:
Total Price for SNOW PLOW package with polymer
moldboard:
For Body
Code: IHI
$I \?6'25
$1 #tJZ5
•
•
•
•
•
•
Page7of52
Colorado State Purchasing Office (per SFM)
LIST AND EXPLANATIONS OF VEHICLE PACKAGES
FOR THE 2015 MODEL YEAR FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSALS
#440 -PACKAGE: OEM OFF ROAD
Attach one copy of this form to each body code specification sheet that has an Available
Option #440 including the following body code:
F1,F2 1 F3,F4,F8,K1,K2,K3,K5,K6,T1,T4,T5
An installed OEM OFF ROAD package should include the following:
• High pressure front and rear gas shocks
• HID springs
• Mud ~andL; snow radial tires "LT" rated. Specify tire ~· ¥7Mhi£
• Skid plate group. Specify types: _/V._'L_z _____ _
• Front and rear tow hooks
• Limited Slip Rear Axle -Specify Ratio _6.;:;..a.tf.""'~-. ------
• All items to be covered at a minimum by the 3 year 36,000 mile factory warranty
size:
Please list additions and/or deletions to your company's OEM OFF ROAD PACKAGE from the
above listed specs:
Total Price for the OEM OFF ROAD
package:
For Body
Code:
Colorado State Purchasing Office {per SFM)
LIST AND EXPLANATIONS OF VEHICLE PACKAGES
FOR THE 2015 MODEL YEAR FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSALS
Page8of52
#443-STROBE LIGHT
Attach one copy of this form to each body code specification sheet that has an AvaHable Option
#443 inclt,1ding the following body codes:
All C's, D's, E's, F's, G's, H's & K's, P4, PE
The STROBE LIGHT PACKAGE must Include the following:
• Roof mount of strobe on truck, van or sport utility vehicle
• Dual flash strobe with amber shield
• Class 2 light, SAE spec: J1318 or DFS750-A North American Signal spec or equivalent
• Minimum: 15 joules
• Minimum of 60 double flashes per minute
• Base must be aluminum, not plastic.
• Switch Jn cab
• Height between 3 1/2 inches to 6 inches, measured to top of light housing
• Warranty: 1-year parts and labor
• Complete installation with locations as follows:
•
• Location for: strobe light on pickups:
• On tile roof of the pickup cab •
• The light must be centered between the ti"ont of the roof and 1he rear of the roof.
• The light must be also centered ti"om one side to the other side of the roof.
• Location for strobe light on vans and sport utilities:
• On the roof of the van or sport utillfy
• The light must be centered from one side to the other side of the roof
• The light must also be two feet from the rear of the roof.
List the make and model of strobe 1hat is bid:
List any additions and/or deletions of your bid from the STROBE LIGHT PACKAGE specs listed
above:
Total Price for STROBE LIGHT
PACKAGE:
For Body
Code: I~ ·. •
•
•
•
Pagegof52
Colorado State Purchasing Office (per SFM)
LIST AND EXPLANATIONS OF VEHICLE PACKAGES
FOR THE 2015 MODEL YEAR FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSALS
#462 -GOOSENECK TRAILER HITCH
Attach one copy of this fonn to each body code specification sheet that has an Available Option
#462 including the following body codes:
E3,E4,E8,F3,F4,F8, T1, T4, T5
The GOOSENECK TRAILER PACKAGE must indude the following:
ONE sTHWHEEL HITCH WITH FOLDING BALL (2 5/16•) MOUNTED IN BED
• Must be retractable ball mount that allows for a clear and smooth pickup bed when not
in use
• Capacity: 5000 lbs maximum vertical load
• 25,000 max gross trailer weight
• Weld two Yz•steel cross plates (approx. 38" by 4•) under the pickup floor and bolt the 5th
wheel hitch to these cross pieces
• Weld two more Yz" steel plates (approx. 3" by 10·) at right angles under the tow cross
plates and bolt these pieces to the frame
• Trailer wiring harness -7 way
• HD tum signal flasher
• Handling package (describe: ______________ _
• HD battery
• Price to include complete installation.
• All items to be covered at a minimum by the 3 year 36,000 mile factory warranty
Please list additions and/or deletions to your company's Gooseneck trailer package from the
above listed specs:
Total Price for OEM TOWING PACKAGE: $ I 7 ~5
For Body
Code:
• COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Date: Agenda Item: Subject:
January 5, 2015 9cv Purchase Approval: Skid Steer Loader
Initiated By: Staff Source:
Public Works Rick Kahm, Director of Public Works
Brad Hagan, Streets Maintenance Manager
Pat White, Fleet Manager
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Approval of 2015 Capital Equipment Replacement Fund replacements in the 2015 Annual Budget.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff seeks Council approval, by motion, the purchase of 2015 Caterpillar 2720 XHP Skid Steer Loader with
cold planner from General Services Administration (GSA) contract GS-30F-0018U .
• BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
•
This unit replaces Unit 3 2 29, a 2001 Volvo L50D wheel loader that has met the replacement criteria of
years of service, hours of use, and maintenance dollars expended.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Funds are available in the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (CERF) in the amount of $67,723 .
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
GSA Caterpillar Quote
Summary Specification Sheet
•
•
•
Use or Disclosure of Information: This quotation is cons idered proprietary (competitive sensitive) and pro'o'Mied by Caterpillar to the Government for use in bid evaluation purposes only. Restrict access to Government employees with a need to know.
C.ATERPILLAR•
DEFENSE AN D FEDERAL PRODUCTS
Cat World Wide Suooort:
190 Dealerships World Wide
Over 2000 Branch sto res in over 200 Countries
Parts Availability:
85% -89°!. Parts Availability Over-the.C ounter
99.5% Parts Availabllltv withi n 48 hours
Commercial GSA New Machine Quotation: 2720 XHP Skid Steer Loader
Cu stomer Na me: Pat Vvllite
Agency: City of Englewood, Colorado
Phone:
Cu stomer AddreH :
E-Mail: Plffllite@englewgodgov org
CONTRACT #: GS-30F-0018U
CONTRACT E XP : 61312018
Reference Number :
Cage Code: 11083
DUNS : 944204924
TAX ID #: 37-0602744
345-49 11
233-5913
OP-2266
OP-0210
C TI ON
OP-0096 ER WORK TOOLS
381 -8300
Manual tilt and deoth
Includes direct drive unit with 6" (150mml maximum deoth of cut. hvdraulic lines with ouick disconnects.
382-6184
279-5373
L.eu Slandud GSA Discount
L.eu OTO Discount
ltem 1
ltem2
Total Net Price -F .O.B. :
mountino bracket and ha rdware.
KIT KO-WKTL CVR SN TO XH P
BUCKET-GP BOCE 7'Z'
SCP Product)
.57 CYD / 15.4 CFT f.4 4 CUMl Heaped Capacitv
Includes -Boll-on cuffing edge, 1 Piece
Total List Price (USO):
Englewood, CO
Standard Wa"a nty 12 Months I Unlimited Hours
Travel Time and Mil H ge Not Included
Delivery Timeframe Up To 180 Days After Award
21.00%
5.00%
Caterpillar Contact: Andrea Walsh
Phone: 309-578.5349
Em ai l: Walsh Andrea E@cat com
Dealer Contact:
Local Dealer: Wagner Equipment
Title:
Address:
Phone:
Email:
Date Quoted: 121412014
Date E xp ired: 2121201 5
Ca terpillar Price List Date: 11111/2014
,<s,(t fitJ.-,
s
s
s
$
s
s
s
s
s
$
s
s
s
$
~
72,700
210
496
1,820
970
13,110
225
1 719
91 ,250
(19.163)
(4 ,563)
Hiit:Prtc
198
Net Price Factory Item s: ~$-------~6~7 ~72~3
67 ,723
This quote is m ade in accordance w ith GSA Contract GS-30F-00 18U. Caterpillar Inc. is the sole c ontract hol der for GS-30F-001 8U and retains all obligations for c ont ract com pliance pertain ing to p otential delivery
order s associated w ith this quote made on beh alf of Caterpillar Inc. by Wagner Equi pment.
This quote Is considered proprietary, competition sensitive, and provided only for evaluation purposes. If this is considered to be
an offer for items sold on GSA Contract jGS30F0018U] and the Buyer is an entity holding a valid Letter of Authorization or
other otficla l documentation, the terms of the offer are expressly limited to Caterpillar's GSA Contract (GS30F0018UJ and
the te rms set forth here in, unless Caterpillar's and Buyer's authorized representatives agree in writing to other terms and
conditions. If this Is considered to be an offer for Open Market Items an d the Buye r is an entity hold ing a valid Letter of
Authoriz ation or oth er official documentation. the terms of the offer are expressly limited to Caterpillar Inc. Defense & Federal
Products Terms and Conditions of Sale Agreement Form 12·13 an d the terms set forth herein, unless Caterpillar's and Buyer's
authorized representatives agree in writing to other terms and conditions. If this is considered to be an acceptance of Buyer's
terms. then Caterpillar's acceptance is made expressly conditional on Buyer's assent to Caterpillar Inc. Defense & Federal
Products Terms and Conditions of Sale Agreement Form 12-13 and the te rms set forth herein, unless Caterpillar's and Buyer's
authorized representatives agree in writing to other terms and conditions. Caterpillar reserves the right to reject or otherwise not
accept any orders from Buyer pending the satisfactory completion of a responsibility and financial stability review and, if Buyer
is a small business as defined by Small Business Administration regulations (13 CFR 121), Buyer will demonstrate to
Caterpillar's satisfaction Buyer's compliance with th e non-manufacturer rule (13 CFR 121.406). Buyer agrees to facilitate such
reviews bv prom ptly providlna Information upon re auest.
121412014 Page 1
•
•
•
CATERPILLAR MACHINE PRICE LIST
272D SKID STEER LOADER XHP
SANFORD, NORTH CAROLINA
Standard Equipment:
POWERTRAIN
Cat C3 .8 Diesel Engine
-Gross Horsepower per SAE J1349
110 hp (82 kW) @ 2400 RPM
-EPA Tier 4i and EU Stage lllB
Certified with Aftertreatment
-Electric Fuel Priming Pump
-A ir Inlet Heater Starting Aid
-Liquid Cooled, Direct Injection
Two Speed Travel with Ride Control
Air Cleaner, Dual Element, Radial Seal
S-0-S Sampling Valve, Hydraulic Oil
Filter, Cartridge Type, Hydraulic
Filters, Cartridge Type, Fuel
and Water Separator
Radiator/Hydraulic Oil
Cooler (side-by-side)
Spring Applied, Hydraulically Released ,
Parking Brakes
Hydrostatic Transmission
Four Wheel Chain Drive
HYDRAULICS
HYDRAULICS,XHP
-High Flow: 40 gpm (1 50 lpm) max
-High Flow Pressure : 4061 psi
28000 kPa max
-Continuous Flow
-Hydraulics, Proportional
-Worktool Harness
CONTROLS:
Electro/Hydraulic Implement Control, RH
Electro/Hydraulic Hydrostatic
Transmission Control, LH
27201 XHP
Ship Weight
lbs
OPERA TOR ENVIRONMENT
Gauges:
-Fuel Level
-Hour Meter
Operator Warning System Indicators:
-Air Filter Restriction
-Alternator Output
-Armrest Raised I Operator
Out of Seat
-Engine Coolant Temperature
-Engine Oil Pressure
-Air Inlet Heater Activation
-Hydraulic Filter Restriction
-Hydraulic Oil Temperature
-Park Brake Engages
· -Engine Emission System
Storage Compartment with netting
Seat, Comfort, Air Suspension, Cloth,
Heat
-High Back heated seat with recline
-Lumbar support
-Fully adjustable Seat Mounted
Controls
Ergonomic Contoured Armrest
Control Interlock System, when Operator
Leaves Seat or Armrest Raised :
-Hydraulic System Disables
-Hydrostatic Transmission Disables
-Parking Brake Engages
ROPS Cab, Enclosed (C3), Tilt Up :
-Air Conditioner incl Heater/Defroster
-Side Windows
-Cup Holder
FOPS, Level I
LIST PRICE
AT DEALER
STARTERS, BA TIERIES, & ALTERNATORS
Top and Rear Windows
Deluxe Headliner
Floormat 1000 CCA Heavy Duty Battery
B..ECTRICAL
12 Volt Electrical System
100 Ampere Alternator
Ignition Key Start I Stop I Aux Switch
Lights:-Gauge Backlighting
-Two Rear Tail Lights
-Two Rear Halogen Working Lights
-Two Adjustable Front
Halogen Lights
-Dome Light
Backup Alarm
Electrical Outlet, Beacon
Supersedes
Caterpillar: Confidential Green
US-AD
Interior Rear View Mirror
12V Electric Socket
Horn
Hand (Dial) & Foot Throttle, Electronic
Dual Direction Electronic Self Level -
(Raise and lower)
Work Tool Return to Dig
Work Tool Positioner
Electronic Snubbing (Lift)
Advanced LCD Display
-Full color 5 inch LCD screen
-Advanced Anti-theft Security System,
multi operator
-Rear View Camera
-Integrated AMICS features
Subject to chan9e without notice
Printed 1n USA
U . S. DOLLAR CURRENCY
Effective 11 NOV2014
27201 XHP-001
CATERPILLAR MACHINE PRICE LIST
272D SKID STEER LOADER XHP
SANFORD, NORTH CAROLINA
FRAMES
Lift Linkage, Vertical Path
Chassis, One Piece Welded
Machine Tie Down Points (4)
Belly Pan Cleanout
Support, Lift Arm
Rear Bumper, Welded
OTHER STANDARD EQUIPMENT
Engine Enclosure · Lockable
Extended Life Antifreeze (-37C, -34F)
Coupler, Mechanical
Hydraulic Oil Level Sight Gauge
Radiator Coolant Level Sight Gauge
Radiator Expansion Bottle
Cat Tough Guard Hose
Counterweight, Machine, External
Heavy Duty Flat Faced Quick Disconnects
with Integrated Pressure Release
Split D-Ring to Route Work Tool Hoses
Along Side of Left Lift Arm
Variable Speed Hydraulic Cooling Fan
Per SAE J818-2007 and EN 474-3:2006 and
ISO 14397-1 :2007
At 50% Tipping Load
• 3700 lb (1698 kg)
Supersedes
Caterpillar: Confidential Green
US-AD
Subject to change without notice
Printed in USA
U. S . DOLLAR CURRENCY
27201 XHP
Ship Weight
lbs
LIST PRICE
AT DEALER •
•
Effective 11 NOV2
272D1 XHP-002
•
•
•
ENGLEWOOD BID#
SERVICENTER GARAGE
SUMMARY SPECIFICATION SHEET
FOR
NEW VEHICLES
-------------------
MANUFACTURER OF VEHICLE ~C_a_te_,rp ..... i_llar __________ _
MODEL OF VEHICLE 272D XHP Skid Steer Loader
-~---------~~~~~~~~
AIR CONDITIONING YES NO
AUTO MA TIC TRANSMISSION YES NO
POWER WINDOWS YES NO
POWER DOOR LOCKS YES NO
4 WHEEL DRIVE YES NO
FLEX FUEL OPTION YES NO
CERF REPLACEMENT YES NO
NEW ADDITION TO FLEET YES NO
DEPARTMENT VEHICLE ASSIGNED TO 021003 Streets Division
COMMENTS: This unit replaces Unit 3229, a 2001 Volvo L50D loader that has met
the replacement criteria of years of service, hours of use, and maintenance dollars
expended. Departmental needs have changed and a smaller piece of equipment equipped
with a cold planer will provide a more efficient operation. Purchase of this unit will also
provide a departmental cost savings in CERF and Maintenance. Attached is the GSA bid
award for this piece of equipment (including the cold planner) in the amount of
$67,723 .00 .
City of Englewood
AGENDA ITEM 10 (a)
~DBLIC HEARING ROSTER
DATE: January 5, 2015
A public hearing to gather input on Council Bill No. 69, authorizing amendments
to Title 16: Unified Development Code regarding Official Zoning Map
Amendments (Rezoning) and Planned Unit Developments.
PLEASE PRINT
NAME ADDRESS
A public hearing to gather input on Council Bill No. 69, authorizing amendmen
to Title 16: Unified Development Code regarding Official Zoning Map
Amendments (Rezoning) and Planned Unit Developments.
PLEASE PRINT
NAME ADDRESS
("'"'Community Media of Colorado
(
State of Colorado
County of Arapahoe
AFFIDAVIT OF
PUBLICATION
)ss
This Affidavit of Publication for the Englewood Herald, a weekly newspaper, printed
and published for the County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado, hereby certifies that
~~·
the attached legal notice was published in said newspaper once in each week, for A~./
successive week(s), the last of which publication was made the 19th day of JflfJ>.,.,.
December A.O., 2014, and that copies of each number of said i aper in w 1\~h sar , ";'"·
Public Notice was published were delivered by carriers or tran ~~-tt~d by niliil to/ ~~-:%"" f._, •
each of the subscribers of said paper, according to their accustom~:'· .. ade of :.'
business in this office.
for the Englewood Herald
State of Colorado )
County of Arapahoe
,[
• :1'-< /' ~"&# 4~ ~
The above Affidavit and O~ttiTieate of Publication ' as subscribed and sworn to
before me by the above na~~~iJ r~j:P:\~a,tley,,p tf~lisher of said newspaper, who ·.:-·. A ·~,...,, 'ri·.· .··
is personally known to me to'P,e w e ·identrc)14Jerson in the above certificate on this
19th day of December A.O., 2';"
,.
My Commission Expires 10/12/16
Notary Public,
~,,·. f'P -,.~
Public N.otlce .,
crrv OF:ENGLEWOOo· . ·• ·-~· • • .. !::::<•" ·,
,, i';N~:tlg~ OF,;PUBLIC HE~l'l!NG
,,.: Notice I• hereby glwn that the City
· Councll:Of..lhe, City pf Englewood, .
. Colorado,.·has scheduled a Public
·i' li••rl11g ·at.a ·Regu1iir c11ycc>Unc11 ·"
f.; .Meeting on-Jenilar}r.5, 2015, at 7:30 ·' .
~: p.m. In the City COtinell Chamber• of
' '' Engl-ood c:lvic Clinter, 1000 .•. , .·
f : ~ngl-ood Per~ay; to,!jat~ejpubll~:
, ... ,input on Councu·am No:69 .:· ·
i, · ·•mending Title 1 ~;cliapter.2;' Section
1;_ 7, __ entltledOfflclal Zoning Map · .
f':o ·,Nnel\t11)18nte (REZONINGS); and Tiiie
:·; . ~ 6, ~apter 2, Section 8, to be . . .:...;
· · . entitled Planned Unit DeveiC!Pment ~·
.. <' .(P.UD) ~~nlng· Proceee and --... .~
~:>. .R8(jl)lferl)ente, of the Eligl-ood ;:.
i,:;,:· 'M~nlc!pal ~ode 2000. ·All lnterasted '·
·. · pai'tles may expraee opinions In· ., .• ·•
.. : , ·person at the Public Hearing or In · ·
J ·· writing to be received b'y .the City . ·. ,
i··· Cieri< by 5:00 p.m. on January 5, ·· '
~i;· .~015. Anyone wlehlng to aptiek af
· the Pu~llc Hl\•rl!'g may c:itll th• City. :
Clerk'e Office, 303-76;!,2407 to -:-
schedule their Piuentatlon or a·algn-
up sheet wlll be avl!ll•'1l11· al•Jtie· iloot:;··
By ord.;/t~( lh1i"\Engle~~ '~city
Council., .. ::.~/::·~.·.-.'.: ·,.~:l .;~-"'r \::._ ~ -y • :
( ' Loucrlehla' A. 0Ellls, MMC .·· :,_.: ·
g:~:~:~~~1~i~ ; ' " :>
iooo·Engl-ooc;l_ParkWay , ..
· Eng1-ooc1, Cploraao 80110
Legal ~otice ~o.: ~3~ · : .. '.i ( , .
First Publication : December 19, 2014 ·. ·
Last _Publrcatron : December 19,2014 _ , ·.
Publisher: The Englewoo(! H<!~ld '
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
City of Englewood, Colorado
Official Website
www.englewoodgov.org
I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk, for the City of Englewood, do solemnly swear
· that the attached legal notice (Notice of Public Hearing on January 5, 2015 on a public
hearing to gather input on Council Bill No. 69 -a bill for an ordinance amending Title 16,
Chapter 2, Section 7, entitled Official Zoning Map amendments (REZONINGS); and Title
16 , Chapter 2 , Section 8, to be entitled Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezoning
Process and Requirements, of the Englewood Municipal Code 2000 was published on the
Official City of Englewood Website from Decemb
State of Colorado )
) SS
County of Arapahoe )
Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 5th day of January, 2015 .
My Commission Expires: //-IJ3· ZO / lo
SEAL KERRY BUSH
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY ID 19964018041
MY COM MISSION EXPIRE S NOVEMBER 8, 2016
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
Notice is hereby given that the City
Council of the City of Englewood,
Colorado, has scheduled a Public
Hearing at a Regular City Council
Meeting on January 5, 2015, at 7:30
p.m. in the City Council Chambers of
Englewood Civic Center, 1000
Englewood Parkway, to gather public
input on Council Bill No. 69,
amending Title 16, Chapter 2, Section
7, entitled Official Zoning Map
Amendments (REZONINGS); and Title
16, Chapter 2, Section 8, to be
entitled Planned Unit Development
(PUD) Rezoning Process and
Requirements of the Englewood
Municipal Code 2000. All interested
parties may express opinions in
person at the Public Hearing or in
writing to be received by the City
Clerk by 5:00 p.m. on January 5,
2015. Anyone wishing to speak at
the Public Hearing may call the City
Clerk's Office, 303-762-2407 to
schedule their presentation or a sign-
up sheet will be available at the door.
By order of the Englewood City
Council.
Loucrishia A. Ellis, MMC
City Clerk
City of Englewood
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, Colorado 80110
PUBLISHED: December 17, 2014
Official Website of the
City of Englewood, Colorado
• COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Date: Agenda Item: Subject:
January 5, 2015 10 a Public Hearing: Ordinance Adopting Amendments to Title
16 Concerning Rezonings and Planned Unit Development
Initiated By: Staff Source:
Community Development Department Chris Neubecker, Senior Planner
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
This item was most recently discussed with City Council during First Reading on December 15, 2014. This
ordinance advances the City Council goals of having clear regulations, making the development review
process easier, responding to market conditions for rezonings, and ensuring that new developments
integrate with surrounding land uses and respond to the needs of the community .
• PREVIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
•
The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed this proposal to amend Title 16: Unified Development
Code, Planned Unit Developments at study sessions on the following dates :
• November 6, 2012
• February 5, 2013
• September 4, 2013
• April 8, 2014
The Commission conducted Public Hearings on April 22 and October 7, 2014. There was one member of
the public that testified at the April 22, 2014 public hearing in support of the proposed amendments.
Following the October 7, 2014 hearing, the Commission voted 7-0 in favor of forwarding to City Council
the proposed amendments to Title 16, Chapter 2 : "Development Review and Approval Procedures
(Rezonings)", and "Planned Unit Developments" as presented in the attached Bill for an Ordinance.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Community Development Department recommends conducting a Public Hearing to consider
testimony on Council Bill No. 69 concerning Rezonings and Planned Unit Development.
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
The current Unified Development Code identifies a process for rezoning land (changing the allowed land
uses) by either changing the base zone district or through the Planned Unit Development ("PUD") process.
These procedures list the steps that an applicant must take, and the conditions that must be met, for the
City to review and approve rezonings. However, the current PUD review process does not work well for
land development where a specific site plan and detailed architectural designs have not been developed.
The current process also does not work well where a developer seeks preliminary land use entitlements
before investing in detailed site plans and design standards for the site. Furthermore, the existing regulations
do not have clear application requirements for PUDs. The proposed code amendments fix the shortfalls of
the current code and are intended to facilitate development.
Early on in the discussions on PUDs it was determined by staff and the Planning & Zoning Commission that
a "two-step" process would be best. This process would allow a developer to obtain initial land use and
density entitlements through a "District Plan", followed by a more detailed "Site Development Plan." The
Site Development Plan would include conceptual architecture, location of roads and walkways,
landscaping, etc. At the option of the developer, these two steps could be combined into one step if all
required submittal information is provided up front.
The proposed ordinance will improve the PUD review process by clarifying submittal requirements and
allowing developers to follow the two-step process, if they choose. These changes should help to
encourage development by allowing developers to obtain preliminary land use and density entitlements
before making the investment in detailed site improvement and architectural plans.
ANALYSIS
A Planned Unit Development (PUD) is intended as an alternative to conventional land use regulations
resulting in the creation of a unique zone district that offers the City and Applicant forms or qualities of
development or amenities not possible through existing base zone districts. In some cases, this may result in
different land uses, or different densities, from the base zoning district. However, in all cases, the applicant
must demonstrate to the City that the proposed development plan will be as good as, or better than, the
development that would otherwise be allowed as a "use-by-right" on the property. In most cases, this is
accomplished with higher quality design, better landscaping, or additional amenities not required by current
zoning regulations. As a result, the public receives higher quality development, and the developer receives
increased value from different uses, higher density, or greater certainty of development rights.
Following are some highlights of the proposed code amendment:
• Allows a two-step process: District Plan and a Site Development Plan. Each step would require
public notice and a public hearing.
• District Plans would need to include allowed land uses, maximum density (number of residential
units, or square feet of commercial uses), site plans showing major roads and location of land uses,
proposed building heights, recreation areas or major amenities proposed, conceptual layout of
utilities, minimum perimeter setbacks, and a traffic impact study.
• Site Development Plans must include building footprints, building sizes, sight lines and shadow
studi'is, pedestrian circulation (sidewalks and paths), drainage features, grading plans, parking areas,
landscaping materials, bicycling parking areas, site lighting and conceptual architectural designs.
•
•
• Minimum land area for PUDs would remain one-half acre (21,780 sq. ft.)
• Minor Amendments to PUDs may be approved by the City Manager or designee. Depending on •
the amendment, this would usually involve referral to relevant City departments for comment and
•
•
•
•
•
advice. "Minor Amendments " include changes in the location of structures or facilities, or the
location of streets or walkways, if required by engineering or other circumstances not foreseen at
the time of the PUD approv al. Also, any other change that is not listed as a "Major Amendment"
would be considered a Minor Amendment.
Major Amendments to approved PUDs would require public hearings with Planning Commission
and City Council.
Final approval of a PUD is by City Council ; appeals to Council decisions are to Arapahoe County
Court.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
There will be no direct financial impact on the City as a result of this ordinance. Indirectly, there should be a
positive financial impact on the City by making development easier and encouraging new deve lopment by
facilitating approval of a preliminary District Plan before developers need to invest in more detailed Site
Development Plans .
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Proposed Bill for an Ordinance
•
•
•
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 2014
BY AUTHORITY
A BILL FOR
COUNCIL BILL NO. 69
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER -------
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 16, CHAPTER 2, SECTION 7, ENTITLED OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS (REZONINGS); AND TITLE 16, CHAPTER 2, SECTION 8,
TO BE ENTITLED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) REZONING PROCESS AND
REQUIREMENTS, OF THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE 2000.
WHEREAS, a Planned Unit Development (PUD) is intended as an alternative to conventional
land use regulations resulting in the creation of a unique zone district that offers the City and
Applicant forms or qualities of development or amenities not possible through existing base zone
districts; and
WHEREAS, in 2004 the City adopted the Unified Development Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planned Unit Development regulations in the 2004 Unified Development
Code were included with other types of rezonings and addressed only the basic elements of PUD
size thresholds, criteria, and process; and
WHEREAS, in November 2012 the City began the process to modify the Planned Unit
Development regulations to address a lack of procedural details in the Unified Development
Code; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance is to clarify the regulations for the Planned Unit Development
rezoning of property to ensure that new developments integrate with the surrounding land uses;
and
WHEREAS, the current PUD review process needs to be improved where a specific site plan
and detailed architectural designs have not been adequately developed; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission found that additional detail on the submittal
requirements for a Planned Unit Development would be helpful to applicants to understand the
information required in an application for a PUD and would further help to ensure that the plan
provides sufficient detail for the Commission to make an informed decision; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission determined that by consolidating
information on Planned Unit Development regulations into one Section of the Development Code
and removing Planned Unit Developments from "the Official Zoning Map Amendments" Section
will clarify the review process and development standards for PUDs; and
WHEREAS, the amendments allow the two step district plan and site plan process to be
joined into one or two steps at the option of the developer; and
1
WHEREAS, District Plans would need to include allowed land uses, maximum density
(number of residential units, or square feet of commercial uses), preliminary site plans showing
major roads and location of land uses, proposed building heights, recreation areas or major
amenities proposed, conceptual layout of utilities, minimum perimeter setbacks, and a traffic
impact study; and
WHEREAS, Site Development Plans must include building footprints, building sizes, sight
lines and shadow studies, pedestrian circulation (sidewalks and paths), drainage features, grading
plans, parking areas, landscaping materials, bicycle parking areas, site lighting and conceptual
architectural designs; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance relocates and consolidates provisions regarding Planned Unit
Development (PUD) processes and requirements into one subsection, 16-2-8 EMC to make the
requirements easier for applicants to see what is required for a rezoning to a PUD; and
WHEREAS, the intent of PUDs is to allow for the creation of a unique zone district and to
accomplish that 16-2-7(B)(2) is clarified and moved to 16-2-8(A) and;
WHEREAS, the minimum size for a PUD remains the same at one-half acre and;
WHEREAS, 16-2-7(C)(2) relating to neighborhood meetings is amended to remove the
possible criminal sanctions for City staff regarding reporting: and
WHEREAS, public utilities and other government agencies have been added to the City
review process to insure that the application is compatible with existing infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, 16-2-7(F)(2) and 16-2-7(G)(3) regarding Commission hearings and standards
transferred to 16-2-8(G) which outlines the entire approval process; and
WHEREAS, 16-2-7(H)(2) removes PUDs from the general rezoning criteria section and
transfers it to l 6-2-8(F) along with the provision that it be consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan; and
WHEREAS, 16-2-7(!) repeals the lapsing provision in the current title regarding TSA and
base district "rezonings" and this ordinance also clarifies that PUD rezonings do not lapse 16-2-8
(G) because any rezoning is a permanent change and does not lapse; and
WHEREAS, 16-2-8(A) through (C) is new language to clarify the intent of and procedures for
allowing PUD rezoning; and
WHEREAS, 16-2-8(D) lists permitted uses allowed under a PUD; and
WHEREAS, 16-2-8(E) describes the requirements for granting a PUD rezoning, some of
which exist in the current code and are relocated to this section; and
WHEREAS, 16-2-8(F) lists the current criteria for a PUD rezoning which has no major
change; and
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
WHEREAS, 16-2-8(G) & (H) clarifies the difference between a PUD District Plan and a PUD
Site Development Plan which provides more details for the proposed development; and
WHEREAS, 12-2-8(G) & (H) also sets out the process for approval and allows the applicant
to choose a one or two step process depending upon the amount of detail provided in the
application; and
WHEREAS, 16-2-8(!) defines and lists criteria for major and minor amendments to a
previously approved PUD and a Site Development Plan; and
WHEREAS, 16-2-8(J) reiterates that the appeal process for PUD rezoning is the same as for
any other rezoning under Title 16 EMC;and
WHEREAS, after a Public Hearing the Englewood Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval ofthis Ordinance at their October 7, 2014 meeting.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes amending
Title 16, Chapter 2 , Section 7, entitled Official Zoning Map Amendments (Rezonings) of the
Englewood Municipal Code 2000, to read as follows :
16-2-7: Official Zoning Map Amendments (Rezonings) .
The City may initially zone annexed property, or the boundaries or areas of any zone district may
be changed, or the zone classification of any parcel of land may be changed pursuant to this
Section. Rezonings shall not be used as a way to legitimize nonconforming uses or structures,
and should not be used when a conditional use, Zoning Variance, or Administrative Adjustment
could be used to achieve the same result. Rezonings to a Planned Unit Development district
(PUD) or Transit Station Area (TSA) distriet are sl%bjeet to additional shall follow the procedures
and criteria as set forth in tffis.-Section 16-2-8 for Planned Unit Developments .
A . Initiation .
1. A proposed rezoning may be initiated by any party identified in Section 16-2-3 .A
EMC .
2. A rezoning application shall expire one (1) year after submittal unless a public
hearing on the application has been held by the Council on or before that date;
provided, however, that the City Manager or designee may extend the application for
six ( 6) months if the reason for the delay was due to circumstances beyond the
control of the applicant .
3
3. No application for rezoraeg property shall be accepteEi withffi twelve (12) months
following a final Eiecision on a prior rezoning application relating to all or aRj'
portion of that same property. A "fit~al Eiecision" shall mean Eienial of a rezonffig by
the Council, or ',vithEirawal of the rezoning application occHfling after a
recotnmenEiation of Eienial by the Commission.
B. Thresholds for Rezoning.
1. Thresholds for Base District Rezonings :
a . General. A base district rezoning results in the change of a property's existing
base zoning district classification to a base zoning district classification
identified in Table 16-3-1.1, other than a Pl.JD or TSA district.
b. Minimum District Size. A base district rezoning application shall only be
considered for properties greater than thirty-seven thousand~ five hundred
(37,500) square feet ofland area and contiguous to a compatible zone district.
c . For purposes of this Section, "compatible zone districts" are districts within
the same base zoning district headings as identified in Table 16-3-1.1 (i .e. R-2-
A and R-2-B are compatible zone districts within residential one anEi tmilti l:lTlit
Eli strict headings.) The contiguity to compatible zone district requirement
does not apply if the rezoning request is consistent with and implements the
Comorehensive Plan.
TraesholEis for PlanneEi Unit Development (PUD) Rezonings:
a-: GeneMI. ,A, PUD rezoning results in the creation of a l:lTliq-ue zone Eiistrict that
offers the City aE!Eiitional forms or q-ualities of Eievelopment or amenities not
possible traough: other zone illstricts. The terms anEi conEiitions of eaoh PUD
z01ui Eiistriot shall be baseEi on negotiations between the property owner and
the City, but all PUD zone Eiistricts must be consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan anEi applicable provisions of this Title. Each PUD zone Eiistrict must
incluEie its ovln list of permitte<:i anEi conEiitional uses anEi shall iEientify w+iat
Eie·"elopment stanEiarEis shall apply . If a PUD proposal 'Nill req-uire the creation
of one ( 1) or more new lots of recorEi, or amendment of the bounEiaries or
properties of eKisting lots of recorEi, then approval of a subillYision plat shall
also be req-uireEi.
-9. };f-ir1il'lt1"'l'lt Distriet &ice. A PUD rezoning application shall only be consiEiereEi
for properties greater than one half 0~) acre in area.
J. 2,. Thresholds for Transit Station Area (TSA) Rezonings:
a. District Location. The location of a Transit Station Area (TSA) district shall
be consistent with the following criteria:
4
•
•
•
•
•
•
(1) The location of the proposed TSA district shall be consistent with the
locations described or depicted for transit-related and/or mixed-use
development in the Comprehensive Plan.
(2) The TSA district shall be located generally within a one-quarter (Y-1) mile
radius of an existing, or a planned and approved light-rail rapid transit
station.
(3) The one-quarter (Y-1) mile radius may be augmented by an extended area
which would include up to a one-half (Yi) mile radius where the area is
contiguous to the TSA district and that it can be demonstrated that the
area creates a transitional zone when the Planning and Zoning
Commission makes a finding that such an extension is a benefit to the
adjoining zone districts.
b. Minimum District Size .
(1) An application to rezone to a TSA district shall include a minimum gross
land area of three (3) acres.
(2) The City may allow smaller incremental and contiguous additions to an
existing TSA district, if the subsequent rezoning application:
(a) Includes a minimum gross land area of twenty thousand (20,000)
square feet;
(b) Is consistent with the intent of the TSA district;
( c) Provides uses or a mix of uses complementary to the mix of uses
planned or developed in the adjoining, existing TSA district; and
( d) Demonstrates site and building designs that will be compatible
with, and integrated with, the adjoining, existing TSA district.
C. Pre-Application Review and Neighborhood Meeting.
1. Pre-Application Conference. All applicants for rezoning shall be required to participate
in a pre-application conference pursuant to Section 16-2-3.F EMC.
2. Pre-Application Neighborhood Meeting Re'i!IOIBH:gs. Following the pre-application
conference, each applicant for a rezoning shall hold a neighborhood meeting in
accordance with City procedures to describe their proposal before an application for
rezoning can be accepted by the City. The neighborhood meeting is an opportunity for
the applicant to describe the proposal as well as for area residents and property owners
to offer input about the proposal at an early stage. The applicant shall hold the meeting
at a time and location accessible and convenient for the public. The City shall be
represented at the meeting. Following the neighborhood meeting +!he City
representative shal±-may prepare a written report summarizing the general discussion
of the neighborhood meeting and make copies available to the City staff, the applicant,
and the public.
5
3 . The maximum time between a required neighborhood meeting and a public hearing
before the Commission shall not be more than one hundred eighty (180) days. In the
event the public hearing is not held within one hundred eighty (180) days , the applicant
shall be required to hold another neighborhood meeting.
D. Noti ce . The City Manager or designee shall require that notice of
required public hearings be given in accordance with Section 16-
2-3 .G EMC.
E. City R eview. The City Manager or designee shall review the
proposed rezoning, and may refer the application to any City
department or agency (including any utility providers. other
municipalities or other agency as determined by the City) for its
review and comments, and shall prepare a report of its
recommendations for rev iew by the Commission and Council. A
copy of the report shall be furnished to the applicant.
F . Commission Review and Recommendation.
1. Base Distriet Re'l:ofl::in.g.
a-: The Commission shall review the proposed rezoning
and the recommendation of City staff, and shall hold a
public hearing on the proposed rezoning. Following
such hearing, the Commission may make a
recommendation to approve, deny, or modify the
proposed rezoning.
6
City Staff
Review
Commission Review
Council
Decision
Official Zoning Map
Amendments
(Rezonings)
•
•
•
•
•
•
2 . b. The Commission may recommend to the Council that an application for an
initial zoning or a rezoning be approved upon condition that the applicant, or the
applicant's successors and assigns , obtain approval by the Commission and
Council of a site plan or subdivision plat of the subject property either prior
to Council action, within a certain time after Council action. or prior to any site
development.
2-. PUD or TSA Rezoning.
a: The CofflHlissioB shall re>rievl tlie proposed PUD or TSA rezoning, and the
reeommeBdatioBs of City staff OB botli applieatioBs, and shall hold a publie heariBg
OB eaeh applieatioB.
lr. The CofflHlissioB shall theB reYiew the proposed PUD or TSA rezoning
pl:H'sHant to this SeetioB, and followffig tlie pHblie heariBg, ffitt)' reeommeBd tliat the
CoHneil approYe, deB)', or approYe tlie proposed rezoniBg witli eoBditioBs .
3. &. In its review of the rezoning application, in addition to any other criteria and
findings applicable to the decision, the Commission's recommendations shall
include its written findings on each of the following points:
fB ~· The application is or is not iB eoBfonnanee consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and this Title; and
~ lh The application is or is not eoBsistem in conformance with adopted and
generally accepted development standards of deYelopmeBt in the City. and
any other ordinance. law. or requirement of the City; and
~ c. The application is or is not substantially consistent with the goals,
objectives, desigB gHidelffies, and policies and any otlier ordinanee, la=w , er
reqHireFBeBt of the City.
G. Council Action.
1. "Base Distriet Rezoning ApplieatioBs. The Council shall review the proposed
rezoning, the recommendation of City staff, and the recommendation of the
Commission, and shall hold a public hearing on the proposed amendment.
Following such hearing, the Council may approve, deny, or refer a proposed
amendment back to the Commission. ameBd tlie proposal.
2-. PUD and TSA Rezoning.
a. The CoHE:eil shall tfieB re.,'ie'\v the proposed PUD or TSA rezoniBg iB light of
tlie reeoffiFBeBdatioB of City staff, and the reeommeBdatioB of tlie
CofflHlissioB, aE:d shall hold a publie hear..ng OB the proposed rezoeffi.g.
Following sHeh heariBg, the CoHBeil may appro:ve , defl:J', or ameBd the
proposed rezoniBg.
~ i. Refer Back to Commission. No substantial amendment to an application for a
rezoning may be made by the Council after a recommendation on the rezoning has
7
been made by the Commission, unless it is first referred back to the Commission
for comment on the proposed substantial amendment.
H. Criteria. Rezonings shall be made in the interest of promoting the health, safety, and
general welfare of the community, and shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In
addition, the review-or decision-making body shall only recommend approval of, or shall
only approve, a proposed rezoning, if it finds that the proposed rezoning meets the criteria
listed below .
1. For base district rezonings, the proposed rezoning shall meets at least one of the
following criteria:
2.
a. That there has been a material change in the character of the neighborhood or
in the City generally, such that the proposed rezoning would be in the public
interest and consistent with the change; or
b. That the property to be rezoned was previously zoned in error; or
c . That the property cannot be developed, or that no reasonable economic use of
the property can be achieved, under the existing zoning.
The criteria in subsections 1.a through c above shall not apply to the initial
zoning of property annexed to the City or to rezonings that may occur
incidental to a comprehensive City-initiated revision of the City's Official
Zoning Map.
For PUD or TSA rezonings, the proposed development shall ooH'lplies comply with
all applicable use, de.,,elopH'lE!IRt, and dev elopment 4esigB standards set forth in this
Title that are not otherwise modified or waived according to the rezoning approval ;
and the proposed rezoning shall meets at least one of the following criteria:
a. +hat-tThe proposed dev elopment will exceed the development quality
standards , levels of public amenities , or levels of design innovation otherwise
applicable under this Title, and would not be possible allowed or practicable
under a standard zone district with conditional uses or with a reasonable
number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjustments ; or
b . +hat tihe property cannot be developed, or that no reasonable economic use of
the property can be achieved, under the existing zoning, even through the use
of conditional uses or a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or
Administrative Adjustments.
3 . All rezonings shall meet the following criterion:
a. The resulting rezoned property will not have a significant negative impact on
those properties surrounding the rezoned area and that the general public
health, safety and welfare of the community are protected .
8
•
•
•
•
•
•
I. After Approval-Lapsing Period.
1. Base Distriet Rewnffi.g. An approved base distriet rezoning shall not lapse, but shall
remain in effect until and unless sHpereeded superseded by a later or inconsistent
amendment to, or replacement of, the Official Zoning Map. Ilov/ever, ifthe City has
required the slibmissioa of a Zoning Site Plan as part of the re23oniflg proeess, and
has approYed a Zofliag Site Plaa for the rei3oaed property, and the Zoning Site Plan
later lapses pmsuaat to Seetioa Hi 2 9.B BMC, the Couneil ffla-)' initiate a rei3oniag
of the property to its prior i30fle map desigaatioa, or to aa alteraative desigaatioa
Hl:ore eoftSisteat with the CoHipreheasi'le Plaa.
2. PUD or TSA rezoning. An approved PUD or TSA district rezoning shall not lapse,
but shall remain in effect until superseded superseded by a later or inconsistent
amendment to, or replacement of, the TSA District Official Zoning Map.
Section 2 . The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes amending
Title 16, Chapter 2, by adding a new Section 8, entitled Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Rezoning Process and Requirement of the Englewood Municipal Code 2000, to read as follows :
16-2-8: Reserved. PJanned Unit DeyeJonment <PUD) Rezoning Process and
Requirements.
A. Intent. The PUD Zone District is an alternative to conventional land use regulations
resulting in the creation of a unique zone district that offers the City and Applicant forms
or qualities of development or amenities not allowed through existing base zone districts.
The PUD Zone District combines use. density. height. design and site plan considerations
into a unified process . Each PUD Zone District must include its own list of permitted and
conditional uses and shall identify what development standards will anoly.
The PUD Zone District is specifically intended to:
1. Provide an opportunity for the developer and the City to review the tvoe and
intensity of development being proposed. and to identify any elements of the
proposed plan that may not comply with existing City development standards.
2. Provide development opportunities not otherwise permitted within existing zone
districts by reducing or eliminating the inflexibility that sometimes results from strict
application of zoning and development standards .
3 . Permit and encourage innovative design, flexibility. and diversity in land planning
and development.
4. Provide the opportunity for unified development control for a single parcel or
multiple properties in harmony with the environment and respecting the context of
the surrounding neighborhoods by establishing design and development standards for
the general character of the properties within the PUD.
Plan for the general configuration ofland uses. common elements. major
transportation and pedestrian circulation elements. utilities and necessarv easements
9
to serve the site and to connect to existing and planned transportation networks.
pedestrian networks and utilities.
6. Plan for proposed amenities. such as parks. open space and recreational facilities.
7. Identify natural features of the site that should be enhanced. protected or remain
undeveloped.
8. Ensure consistency with the Englewood Comorehensive Plan.
2· Provide for the public health. safety. integrity and general welfare. and otherwise
achieve the purooses provided in the Planned Unit Development Act of 1972 as
amended CC.R.S. 24-67-101. et sea.).
B . Applicabilitv. The provisions ofthis Section shall apply to all lands. uses. and structures to
be rezoned to Planned Unit Development CPUD) Zone District. The provisions of this
Section shall not apply to:
1. Planned Developments CP.D.) approved prior to July 1. 1996. which shall continue to
be governed by the respective development plans and the regulations of the
underlying zone districts. However. any major amendments to an existing P.D. as
determined by the City Manager or designee. shall require review and aporoval
under the new requirements of this Section.
Any land currently zoned PUD. and partially developed prior to the date of the
adoption of this Section. Such approved PUDs may continue and complete such
development under the terms and conditions of approval for that PUD. However.
any major amendments to an existing PUD. as detennined by the City. shall require
review and approval under the new requirements of this Section.
C. Initiation.
1. A proposed rezoning may be initiated by any party identified in Section 16-2-3(A)
EMC. All property owners within the boundaries of a proposed PUD zone district
shall consent in writing to the application for a PUD.
2. A PUD application shall expire one (1) year after submittal unless a public hearing
on the application has been held by the Council on or before that date: provided
however. that the City Manager or designee may extend the application for six (6)
months if the reason for the delay was due to circumstances beyond the control of
the applicant.
3 . No application for substantially the same PUD shall be accepted within twelve (12)
months following a final decision on a prior rezoning application relating to all or
any portion of that same property. A "final decision" shall mean denial of a rezoning
by the Council.
D. Permitted Uses. Uses permitted in a PUD zone district may include any use which is a
permitted use in any zone district of the City. or as may be permitted through the unlisted
uses determination process of Section 16-5-l(B) EMC Unlisted Uses. Each PUD
10
•
•
•
•
•
•
f.
application shall include its own list of allowed or conditional uses and shall identify
applicable design and development standards. A PUD District Plan or a PUD Site
Development Plan may varv the provisions of Title 16 EMC. but only to the extent
specifically shown on an approved PUD District Plan or Site Development Plan.
General Use and Development Requirements and Limitations. PVDs shall be subject to the
following:
1. PUD applications shall only be considered for properties equal to or greater than
one-half (1 /2) acre .
2. Requests for rezoning to a PUD zone district shall be filed on application forms
provided by the City. together with all plans. maps and any other information as may
be necessarv. reasonable and relevant for review by the City. Aoolications shall be
submitted with fees established by City Council resolution.
3.
4.
5.
Q_,_
Requests for rezoning to a PUD zone district shall be authorized in writing by the
landowner(s) or an authorized agent.
All PUD zone districts shall be established through a map amendment to this Title
pursuant to the procedures and criteria set forth in this Title.
The terms and conditions of each PUD zone district shall be based on negotiations
between the applicant and the City. However. all PUD zone districts shall be
consistent with the Comorehensive Plan and aoolicable provisions of this Title .
If a PUD proposal requires the creation of one ( 1) or more new lots ofrecord. or
amendment of the boundaries of existing lots of record. then approval of a
subdivision plat shall also be required.
7. The area ofland for the PUD zone district may be controlled by one or more
landowners and shall be developed under unified control or a unified plan of
development.
8. Provisions shall be made for the establishment of an organization for the ownership
and maintenance of areas designated as private streets and/or common space unless
other adequate arrangements for the ownership and maintenance thereof are provided
in a manner acceptable to the City Council.
2_,_ The PUD zone district shall be subject to all applicable use and development
standards of this Title unless otherwise waived or modified by the applicant and
approved by City Council in the terms of the aporoved PUD.
F. Approval Criteria. PVD rezonings shall be made in the interest of promoting the health.
safety. and general welfare of the community. and shall be consistent with the
Comorehensive Plan. In addition the review or decision making body shall only
recommend approval of. or shall only approve. a proposed PUD rezoning if it finds that the
proposed rezoning meets the criteria listed below:
The proposed development shall comply with all applicable use. development. and
design standards set forth in this Title that are not otherwise modified or waived
11
according to the rezoning approval. In addition. the proposed rezoning shall meet at
least one of the following criteria:
~ The proposed development will exceed the development quality standards:
levels of public amenities: or levels of design innovation otherwise applicable
under this Title. and the proposed development would not be allowed or
practicable under a standard zone district with conditional uses or with a
reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjustments: or
h., The property cannot be developed. or no reasonable economic use of the
propertv can be achieved. under the existing zoning. even through the use of
conditional uses or a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or
Administrative Adjustments.
2. All PUD rezonings shall meet the following criterion:
a. The resulting rezoned property will not have a significant negative impact on
those properties surrounding the rezoned area and the general public health.
safety and welfare of the community will be protected .
.G.,_ PUD Avproval Process Summary: The Planned Unit Development zone district requires
three (3) steps for PUD project review and approval: 1) Pre-application review and
neighborhood meeting: 2) PUD District Plan review and approval: 3) PUD Site
Development Plan review and approval. If an applicant provides site-specific development
plans. the PUD District Plan and PUD Site Development Plan steps may be combined.
The PUD rezoning may be processed in one phase or two. at the option of the developer.
A complete and final PUD shall not take effect until and unless all of the information
required below for both a PUD District Plan and a PUD Site Development Plan have been
reviewed and approved by the City.
The PUD District Plan is a general plan for the land within the boundaries of the
application. and includes general land uses and densities. building heights. general design
intent. parking ratios. and a conceptual layout of the site. Approval of PUD District Plan
requires a later approval of a PUD Site Development Plan prior to any development or
issuance of a Building Permit.
The PUD Site Development Plan is a more detailed plan for the development of the site by
applying the standards set forth in the District Plan. but shall also include a statement of
architectural intent: design standards necessarv to achieve the architectural intent: location
of major transportation and circulation systems: parking standards: landscaping
requirements: common elements and other details required to demonstrate that the
development will meet or exceed the standards set forth on the District Plan and the
qualities of development otherwise required by City standards in the base zone district.
Pre-Application Conference and Neighborhood Meeting: Applicant shall submit a
preliminarv proposal indicating the property to be included in the proposed PUD: the
size of the land in acres and square feet: proposed land uses: maximum density
and/or number of units: anticipated building heights: and approximate location of
major circulation elements. Staff may review the preliminary proposal and provide
12
•
•
•
•
•
•
written comments and recommendations to potential applicants. No project approval
is implied or granted at this early review stage.
Neighborhood Meeting: Following the ore-application conference. each applicant for
a PUD shall hold a neighborhood meeting in accordance with City Procedures to
describe their proposal before an application for rezoning can be accepted by the
City. The neighborhood meeting is an opportunity for the applicant to describe the
proposal as well as for area residents and property owners to off er input about the
oronosal at an early stage. The applicant shall hold the meeting at a time and
location accessible and convenient for the public. The City shall be reoresented at
the meeting. Following the neighborhood meeting. the City representative may
prepare a written report summarizing the general discussion of the neighborhood
meeting and make copies available to the City staff. the applicant. and the public.
The maximum time between a reauired neighborhood meeting and a public hearing
before the Commission shall not be more than one hundred eighty Cl 80) days. In the
event the public hearing is not held within one hundred eighty Cl 80) days. the
applicant shall be required to hold another neighborhood meeting.
2. Notice. The City Manager or designee shall require that notice of required public
hearings be given in accordance with Section 16-2-3. (G) EMC.
3. City Review. The City Manager or designee shall review the proposed PUD. and
may refer the application to any City department or agency (including any utility
providers. other municipalities or other agency as determined in the City) for its
review and comments. and shall prepare a report of its recommendations for review
by the Commission and Council. A copy of the report shall be furnished to the
applicant.
4. Commission Review and Recommendation. The Commission shall review the
proposed PUD and the recommendation of City staff and shall hold a public hearing
on the PUD. Following such hearing the Commission may make a recommendation
to approve. approve with conditions. deny. or modify the PUD.
w In its review of the PUD application. in addition to any other criteria and
findings applicable to the decision. the Commission's recommendations shall
include its written findings on each of the following points:
1. The application is or is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and this
Title: and
2 . The application is or is not in conformance with adopted and generally
accepted development standards. and any other ordinance. law or
requirement of the City: and
3. The application is or is not substantially consistent with the goals.
objectives. and policies of the City .
13
5. Council Action. The Council shall review the proposed PUD. the recommendation
of the City staff. and the recommendation of the Commission. and shall hold a public
hearing on the proposed PUD. Following such hearing. the Council may approve.
deny. or refer a proposed PUD back to the Commission for modifications based on
the requirements of this Title.
6. After Approval-Lapsing Period. An approved PUD shall not lapse. but shall
remain in effect until superseded by a later or inconsistent amendment to. or
replacement of. the PUD or the Official Zoning Map.
~-Following approval of a PUD and the execution of all certificates appearing on
the final PUD document. the applicant shall submit the final PUD and all other
required documents to the City and the City shall record them with the Arapahoe
County Clerk and Recorder. All expenses for recording shall be borne by the
applicant and be paid prior to recording.
H. Submittal Requirements.
PUD District Plan: The PUD District Plan shall include all submittal requirements as
listed below. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make a recommendation
to City Council for final action on a PUD District Plan zoning request. If a PUD
District Plan is submitted for review without inclusion of a PUD Site Development
Plan. then the Planning and Zoning Commission action on the PUD District Plan
shall include a recommendation for final action on the Site Development Plan. which
may include requiring review by staff only. review at a public hearing by the
Planning and Zoning Commission. and additional review at a public hearing by the
City Council. depending upon the size. uses. and complexity of the plan or issues
remaining for review.
PUD Site Development Plan: If a PUD Site Development Plan is submitted with a
PUD District Plan. the Site Development Plan shall be reviewed at the same time as
the PUD District Plan. If a PUD Site Development Plan is submitted subsequently to
a PUD District Plan. then the Site Development Plan shall be reviewed as specified
in the approved District Plan.
2,. PUD District Plan: The applicant shall submit for City review a minimum of twelve
(12) sets of the proposed PUD District plan. Aoolications shall be deemed complete
only upon submittal of all required information and payment of all application fees.
Review will not occur until the application is complete. The PUD District Plan shall
be sufficiently detailed to indicate the general land uses: locations: development
densities and/or minimum lot areas per unit: building heights. major transportation
and circulation elements: the intended design character of the development and shall
include but shall not be limited to. the following :
a. The name and location of the proposed development: and
The names. addresses and phone numbers of the applicants. owners.
developers and designers of the development: and
14
•
•
•
•
•
•
Documentation confirming that the applicant has legally sufficient interest in
the property proposed for development. or is the duly authorized agent of such
a person: and
d . A PUD District Plan. drawn at a scale of not less than one inch per fifty feet
0 "=50 ') along with north arrow. written and graphic scale. of the proposed
development. The District Plan shall be of sufficient detail to determine
impacts. both on and off-site that may require mitigation. The District Plan
shall additionally include the following. where aoolicable:
ill A boundarv survey and legal description prepared by a Colorado
registered Professional Land Surveyor.
ill A description of the location of the property. and an identification of the
primarv developments. sensitive areas and other surrounding uses.
features and major transportation networks in the immediate vicinity of
the property.
ill Adjacent streets. proposed points of access and internal vehicular
circulation routes .
ill Existing zoning and land use for all properties within at least three
hundred feet (300 ') of all property boundarv lines.
ill Location and area of proposed land uses. including private. public and
quasi-public facilities : for plans with multiple uses. applicant shall
provide a land use schedule listing permitted land uses .
!fil Maximum heights of proposed structures.
ill Parking ratios for allowed uses. plus a statement of the intent to use
surface or structured parking.
Lfil The maximum allowed density of the site. including any density
maximums or minimums on individual uses.
(2l A description of the intended parks. recreation and open space features
necessarv and major amenities proposed to achieve the intended goal of
the development. including the approximate location and area of open
space and recreation areas.
!lQ1 General intent and location of landscape areas. including percent of site
dedicated to natural and landscaped areas. and transitional buffer areas.
il,ll Location of existing bus stops. bike paths and pedestrian networks .
ill) The existing topography of the land and existing natural features.
together with areas subject to 5-year and 100-year flooding .
ill) Locations of any existing easements on the property.
15
W) Required major extensions of utilities. including conceptual layout of
utilities and storm sewer systems.
LU) A description of the architectural design concept and development
standards for exterior building materials sufficient to demonstrate that
the development will be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood
or will achieve a higher level of design. Development standards shall
include a list of allowed and prohibited exterior materials. standards for
articulation of street facing facades. and minimum transparency
(windows) for building elevations .
ilfil Minimum perimeter setbacks and other setbacks as appropriate.
il1l A Traffic hnpact Study describing existing conditions. orojected traffic
generation from the new development. and anticipated impacts on the
external street network in the vicinity of the proposed PUD.
LW A written statement generally describing the proposed PUD and the
market which it is intended to serve. its relationship to the
Comprehensive Plan. and how the design and architectural concept of
the proposed PUD will relate to adjacent property. Where the
applicant's objectives are not substantially consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan. the statement shall include the changed or
changing conditions that justify aporoval of the proposal.
!121 Other information deemed necessarv. reasonable. and relevant to
evaluate the application as determined by City Manager or designee.
Planning and Zoning Commission. or City Council.
3. PUD Site Development Plan: After or concurrent with the review of the PUD
District Plan. the applicant shall submit for City review a minimum of twelve (12)
sets of the proposed PUD Site Development Plan. Applications shall be deemed
complete only upon submittal of all required submittal information and payment of
applicable fees. Review will not occur until the application is complete. The PUD
Site Development Plan may include the entire area within the PUD District Plan or
the PUD Site Development Plan may consist of one or more phases. provided
however. that the approval of any one phase may be contingent on improvements
that involve other or all phases. The PUD Site Development Plan shall be
sufficiently detailed and shall contain such information and documentation to fully
indicate the ultimate operation and appearance of the project and shall include. but
shall not be limited to. the following:
a. A boundary survey and legal description prepared by a Colorado registered
Professional Land Surveyor.
b. Structure footprints. locations. gross floor areas. building heights and
dimensioned setbacks from streets. as well as other structures and other
features .
Sight lines and shadow studies .
16
•
•
•
•
•
•
Locations of major vehicular circulation system elements. including streets .
curb cuts. and parking areas. Circulation systems shall be designed to connect
with existing or planned street networks.
e. Pedestrian circulation elements including sidewalks. pathways. bus stops.
plazas. with materials indicated: pedestrian circulation systems shall be
designed to connect with existing or planned sidewalks and pathways.
i
g.
h.
k
.l.
k.
l
m.
Drainage features including retention and detention areas.
Overall grading showing existing and proposed grades.
Location. dimensions and descriptions of all existing utility easements on the
property.
Parking areas and a preliminarv design of internal circulation for parking areas
or structures.
Location and amount of bicycle parking .
Loading and trash areas.
A schedule of dwelling units (if aop)icable) by building. and dwelling unit
density based on units divided by acres of net lot area remaining after right-of-
way dedications .
Location and area of parks. open space and recreation facilities. including
amolU}ts and locations of play areas for children and other recreational areas
shown on the PUD District Plan.
n . Landscaping to include a material schedule listing quantities. plant tvoes (e.g.
deciduous street trees. evergreen shrubs. etc.). common name. minimum size at
planting. area calculations for required and provided landscape area.
_Q,_ Fences. walls or year-round natural screen planting and landscaping when
necessarv to shield adjacent residential areas from commercial. industrial and
parking areas .
R,, Site lighting elements. including street lights. pedestrian lights and any other
lighting elements.
g,. Areas subject to flooding from a major storm including the 5-year and 100-
year storms. detention and retention areas and provisions for controlled release
of water from detention or retention areas following a major storm.
r,, Site signage locations. and lighting of signs including specifically adopted sign
standards where aoolicable.
Public amenities that may be included in the development proposal. including
public art .
17
Conceptual building elevations that illustrate how the design standards
established in the PUD District Plan are being implemented. including
architectural concepts. facade treatments. and exterior building materials. as
necessary to establish how the proposed PUD uses and structures relate
internally and/or to the neighboring properties.
u. Other information deemed necessary. reasonable. and relevant to evaluate the
application as determined by City Manager or designee. Planning and Zoning
Commission. or City Council.
L Amendments.
1. District Plan Amendments.
a. Major Amendments to the PUD District Plan: Major amendments may be made
to the approved Planned Unit Development District Plan pursuant to the
procedures as provided within this Section 16-2-8 EMC. including a
neighborhood meeting. Major amendments shall include any of the following:
ill An increase in the maximum building height beyond that allowed in the
approved PUD District Plan.
al An increase in the maximum allowed density or number of units beyond
that allowed in the approved PUD District Plan.
ill A change in land use to a use not otherwise allowed in the approved PUD
District Plan.
ill A reduction of the perimeter setbacks from those required in the approved
PUD District Plan.
ill A reduction in the amount of landscaping required in the approved PUD
District Plan.
Lfil An increase in the allowed lot coverage above that approved in the PUD
District Plan.
fil Any change not considered a minor amendment by the City Manager or
designee.
b., Minor Amendments to the PUD District Development Plan: The City Manager
or designee may approve minor amendments in the location of structures or
facilities. or location of streets or walkways if required by engineering or other
circumstances not foreseen at the time the Planned Unit Development District
Plan was approved so long as no amendment violates any standard or regulation
set forth in this Section: or any change not listed as a "Major Amendment" in
Section 16-2-8CD(l)(a) above.
18
•
•
•
•
•
•
Site Development Plan Amendments: All PUD Site Development Plans and
documents may be changed and/or amended in whole or in part from time to time as
provided in this Section.
a. Major Amendments to PUD Site Development Plans: PUD Site Development
Plans approved and recorded hereunder may only be amended as provided in
Section 16-2-8CH)(3) and CG) EMC. This shall include those amendments
which meet any of the following criteria:
ill A change in the character of the development: or
!21 A change in the allowed land uses: or
ill A change in the general location of land uses: or
ill An increase in the maximum allowed building or structure height: or
ill An increase in the number of dwelling units. or in the ratio of the gross
floor area of structures to the land area. or increases in the proposed
gross floor area within any particular land use: or
!fil A change in the required setbacks from property lines. or "build-to"
lines: or
ill An increase of more than two percent (2%) in ground coverage by
structures or surface parking: or
W A reduction by more than two percent (2%) in the land area designated
for landscaping: or
£21 A reduction in the ratio of off-street parking and loading space to gross
floor area or number of dwelling units in structures: or
!1fil A change affecting the access from and through public right5-of-way.
b. Minor Amendments to PUD Site Development Plan: The City. through the
City Manager or designee. may authorize minor deviations from the PUD Site
Development Plan when such deviations appear necessarv in light of technical
or engineering considerations. Minor Amendments shall not be permitted for
any changes included with the list of Major Amendments in Section 16-2-
8CDC2)(a) above.
L Apveals.
1. PUD District Plan: The applicant may appeal any determination or action taken by
the City Council under this Chapter to an Arapahoe County Court of competent
jurisdiction. Said appeal to the court must comply with Rule 106 of Colorado Rules
of Civil Procedure .
19
2. PUD Site Development Plan: The applicant may appeal any determination or action
taken by the City Council under this Chapter to an Arapahoe County court of
competent jurisdiction. Said appeal to the court must comply with Rule 106 of
Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure.
Editor's note -Ord. 08-48, § 4, adopted Sept. 15, 2008, deleted 16-2-8, which pertained to
overall concept plan review and derived from Ord. 04-5.
Section 3. Safety Clauses. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this
Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Englewood, that it is
promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public, and that this Ordinance is necessary
for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and
welfare. The City Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the
proper legislative object sought to be obtained.
Section 4. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Ordinance or the
application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjudged by a court of
competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder
of this Ordinance or it application to other persons or circumstances.
Section 5. Inconsistent Ordinances. All other Ordinances or portions thereof inconsistent or
conflicting with this Ordinance or any portion hereof are hereby repealed to the extent of such
inconsistency or conflict.
Section 6. Effect of repeal or modification. The repeal or modification of any provision of
the Code of the City of Englewood by this Ordinance shall not release, extinguish, alter, modify,
or change in whole or in part any penalty, forfeiture, or liability, either civil or criminal, which
shall have been incurred under such provision, and each provision shall be treated and held as
still remaining in force for the purposes of sustaining any and all proper actions, suits,
proceedings, and prosecutions for the enforcement of the penalty, forfeiture, or liability, as well
as for the purpose of sustaining any judgment, decree, or order which can or may be rendered,
entered, or made in such actions, suits, proceedings, or prosecutions.
Section 7. Penalty. The Penalty Provision of Section 1-4-1 EMC shall apply to each and
every violation of this Ordinance .
Introduced, read in full , and passed on first reading on the 15th day of December, 2014.
Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City's official newspaper on the 19th day
of December, 2014.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City's official website beginning on the 17th day
of December, 2014 for thirty (30) days .
ATTEST: Randy P. Penn, Mayor
Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk
20
•
•
•
•
•
•
I, Loucrishia A. Ellis , City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and passed
on first reading on the 15th day of December, 2014.
Loucrishia A. Ellis
21
·'
Pt:EASE PRINT
NAME
City of Englewood
AGENDA ITEM 10 (b)
'==~t ~AEARING RO '[ R
DATE : January 5, 2015
ADDRESS
Community Med ia of Colorado ,,,...
I
AFFIDAVIT OF
PUBLICATION
State of Colorado
County of Arapahoe
)ss
This Affidavit of Publication for the Englewood Herald, a weekly newspaper, printed
and published for the County of Arapahoe , State of Colorado , hereby certifies that ,;;'
~\I.re the attached legal notice was published in said newspaper once in each week, for.,1'·~,,:,~
successive week(s), the last of which publication was made the 19th day of .~q:,..
~4~'·""
December A.O., 2014 , and that copies of each number of said ~~f er in w ii~~ sa,lfl,)*~t.,,
Public Notice was published were delivered by carriers or tran~mi~g by m~il t ···:~
-::i;.·..., µ~
each of the subscribers of said paper, according to their accustolT)e~f , • e of \'
business in this office.
' __ )
for the Englewood Herald
State of Colorado )
t.? County of Arapahoe )SS' · ·'e'..,J-~
t."i.");,,.
~ ·~ -~
The above Affidavit and c ~f!tlficate of Publication waf subscribed and sworn to
• ·I ~c! ~ , ~·,}: '\~\f, , /'
before me by the above named Gera r:Q:.f;l ~al~y . publisher of said newspaper, who
:i ,.r,;~·.1$-.. ~~,!;:"f').
is personally known to me to b,e th~· identi c a!~erson in the above certificate on this
.~ ,¥ r~·
19th day of December A .O., 20~4. ~
My Commission Expires 10/12/16
Notary Public,
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
City of Englewood, Colorado
Official Website
www.englewoodgov.org
I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk, for the City of Englewood, do solemnly swear
that the attached legal notice (Notice of Public Hearing on January 5, 2015 on a public
hearing to gather input on Council Bill No. 71 -a bill for an ordinance amending Title 16 ,
Chapter 6 , Sections 1 and 3, of the Englewood Municipal Code 2000, pertaining to
minimum lot widths for multi-unit dwellings in the MU -R-3-8 and MU-R-3-C Zone Districts.)
was published on the Offic ial City of Englewood Website from December 17 , 2014 through
January 5, 2015.
Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk
State of Colorado )
) SS
County of Arapahoe )
Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 5th day of January, 2015.
My Commission Expires: // -D/5 1 20/ (f
SEAL KERRY BUSH
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY ID 19964018041
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 8, 2016
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
Notice is hereby given that the City
Council of the City of Englewood,
Colorado, has scheduled a Public
Hearing at a Regular City Council
Meeting on January 5, 2015, at 7:30
p.m. in the City Council Chambers of
Englewood Civic Center, 1000
Englewood Parkway, to gather public
input on Council Bill No. 71,
amending Title 16, Chapter 6,
Sections 1 and 3, of the Englewood
Municipal Code 2000 pertaining to
minimum lot widths for multi-unit
dwellings in the MU-R-3-B and MU-R-
3-C zone districts. All interested
parties may express opinions in
person at the Public Hearing or in
writing to be received by the City
Clerk by 5:00 p.m. on January 5,
2015. Anyone wishing to speak at
the Public Hearing may call the City
Clerk's Office, 303-762-2407 to
schedule their presentation or a sign-
up sheet will be available at the door.
By order of the Englewood City
Council.
Loucrishia A. Ellis, MMC
City Clerk
City of Englewood
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, Colorado 80110
PUBLISHED: December 17, 2014
Official Website of the
City of Englewood, Colorado
• COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Date: Agenda Item: Subject:
January 5, 2015 10 b Public Hearing: Amendments to Title 16: Minimum Lot
Width for Multi-Unit Dwellings in the MU-R-3-B and MU-R-
3-C Zone Districts
Initiated By: Staff Source:
Community Development Department Brook Bell , Planner II
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Council considered the proposed Title 16 amendments at First Reading on December 15, 2014 and set a
public hearing for January 5, 2015.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendation from the Community Development Department to consider testimony during Public
• Hearing on Council Bill No. 71 authorizing amendments to Title 16 : Unified Development Code regarding
. minimum lot width for multi-unit dwellings in the MU-R-3-B and MU-R-3-C zone districts.
BACKGROUND
It has come to the City 's attention that an error was made related to the minimum lot widths for the MU-R-
3-B zone district when Section 16-6-1.C.1 was added as part of a UDC amendment in Ordinance #3 7 of
2008; and subsequently, when the MU-R-3-C zone district was created by Ordinance #23 of 2012. The
errors are discrepancies between UDC Table 16-6-1.1 : Summary of Dimensional Requirements, and UDC
Section 16-6-1 .C.1 Multi-Unit Development Standards in R-2-A, R-2-8, R-3-A, MU-R-3-A , MU-R-3-8 , and MU-R-
3-C. For the MU-R-3-B and MU-R-3-C zone districts, the minimum lot width required for a multi-unit dwelling
in Table 16-6-1.1 is "None"; whereas, Section 16-6-1.C.1 requires a minimum lot width of "twenty-five feet
(25 ') per unit for properties with alley access" and "thirty feet (30 ') per unit" for properties without alley
access .
SUMMARY
UDC section 16-6-1.C.1 was added as part of a UDC amendment in Ordinance #37 of 2008; and
subsequently, the MU-R-3-C zone district was created by Ordinance #23 of 2012. Since then, it has come
to the City's attention that errors were made that created discrepancies in the minimum lot widths required
for the MU-R-3-B and MU-R-3-C zone districts between UDC Table 16-6-1 .1 and UDC Section 16-6-1.C.1.
After researching the intent of the 2008 Ordinance related to impacts of front loaded garages and the 2012
Ordinance that created the MU-R-3-C zone district, it is clear in both cases that the intent of the Ordinances
• was not to require a minimum lot width for multi-unit dwellings in the MU-R-3-B and MU-R-3-C zone
districts. The proposed amendments to the UDC will correct the discrepancy between the two sections of
the zoning code. •
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
In order to correct the discrepancies between the minimum lot widths required for the MU-R-3-B and MU-
R-3-C zone districts between UDC Table 16-6-1.1 and UDC Section 16-6-1.C.1, staff recommends the
proposed UDC amendments that are attached as the Bill for an Ordinance.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
No financial impacts are anticipated from the adoption of the proposed amendments.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -November 18, 2014
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -November 18, 2014
Planning and Zoning Commission Findings of Fact -November 18, 2014
Bill for an Ordinance
•
•
•
•
•
{' c T y 0 F ENGLEWOOD
COMMUN T y DEVELOPMENT
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning and Zoning Commission
Alan White, Community Development Director/
Chris Neubecker, Senior Planner
Brook Bell, Planner II/
November 18, 2014
Case # 2014-06: Amendments to Minimum Lot Width for Multi-Unit
Dwellings in the MU-R-3-B and MU-R-3-C Zone Districts
RECOMMENDATION:
Community Development Department requests that the Planning and Zoning Commission
review, take public testimony, and forward to City Council a recommendation for adoption
of Unified Development Code (UDC) amendments regarding the minimum lot width for
multi-unit dwellings in the MU-R-3-B and MU-R-3-C zone districts.
BACKGROUND:
It has come to the City's attention that an error was made related to the m1n1mum lot
widths for the MU-R-3-B zone district when Section 16-6-1 .C.1 was added as part of a UDC
amendment in Ordinance #3 7 of 2008; and subsequently, when the MU-R-3-C zone district
was created by Ordinance #23 of 2012 . The errors are discrepancies between UDC Table
16-6-1.1: Summary of Dimensional Requirements, and UDC Section 16-6-1 .C.1 Multi-Unit
Development Standards in R-2-A , R-2-81 R-3-A, MU-R-3-A, MU-R-3-8, and MU-R-3-C. For the
MU-R-3-B and MU-R-3-C zone districts, the minimum lot width required for a multi-unit
dwelling in Table 16-6-1.1 is "None"; whereas, Section 16-6-1 .C.1 requires a minimum lot
width of "twenty-five feet (25') per unit for properties with alley access" and "thirty feet
(30 ') per unit" for properties without alley access. These portions of the UDC are
highlighted and attached as Exhibit A.
ANALYSIS:
Discrepancy Related to the MU-R-3-B Zone District
UDC Table 16-6-1.1 was created with the adoption of the UDC in 2004. Subsequently,
section 16-6-1.C.1 was added as part of a UDC amendment in 2008. One focus of the
2008 UDC amendment was to mitigate negative impacts associated with front loaded
garages and driveways for multi-unit dwellings in the following two areas of the City.
• The first area is the R-2-A, R-2-B, R-3-A , MU-R-:fA, and M'U-R-3-B zone districts that are
mostly .east of South Santa Fe Drive. These areas are typically platted with lots in
increments of 25', and most have alley access .
1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, Colorado 80110 PHONE 303-762-2342 FAX 303-783-6895
www.englewoodgov.org
• The second area is the R-2-A zone district in northwest Englewood. This area is typically
platted with lots in increments of 30', and most do not have alley access. There are no
MU-R-3-B zone districts in northwest Englewood with 30' lots, and most MU-R-3-B
zones east of South Santa Fe Drive without alleys are existing multi-unit condo or
apartment complexes.
The concerns in 2008 over negative impacts associated with front loaded garages and
driveways were valid. However, it was an oversight to include the MU-R-3-B zone district in
the 2008 UDC amendment that required a minimum lot width of 25' per unit for properties
with alley access, and 30' per unit for properties without alley access. In order to correct
the discrepancy between the MU-R-3-B minimum lot width required in UDC Table 16-6-1.1
and UDC Section 16-6-1.C.1 staff recommends the following amendments to the UDC.
• Add an exception in UDC Section 16-6-1.C.1.c.(1) and UDC Section 16-6-1.C.1.d.(1) for
the MU-R-3-B zone district such that the minimum lot width requirements of 25' per unit
for properties with alley access, and 30' per unit for properties without alley access do
not apply. The minimum required lot widths for the MU-R-3-B zone district would
default to "None" per UDC Table 16-6-1.1.
Discrepancy Related to the MU-R-3-C Zone District
•
In order to correct the discrepancy in the MU-R-3-C zone district between the minimum lot
width required in UDC Table 16-6-1.1 and UDC Section 16-6-1.C.1, staff researched
previous Commission and City Council meeting minutes and communications from 2012
when the Ordinance creating the MU-R-3-C zone district was originally passed. In •
researching the intended minimum lot width for multi-unit dwellings in the MU-R-3-C zone
district when the Ordinance was originally adopted, the following was considered.
·One of the objectives leading to the creation of the MU-R-3-C zone district in 2012 was to
establish more flexible dimensional standards for side setbacks, floor area ratio, lot width,
and lot area. In terms of lot width and lot area, the Planning and Zoning Commission
conducted a study session on February 23, 2011 on the Medical District Sub-area 3 which
eventually became the MU-R-3-C zone district. Minutes of the study session include a
statement that the Commission is "Not in favor of adopting a Minimum Lineal Street
Frontage; it is not appropriate for this sub-area." Subsequently, minutes of the March 6,
2012 Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing includes staff testimony that the
proposed MU-R-3-C zone district would, "Remove land area per residential unit
requirement in favor of regulating density through maximum height limit and minimum off-
street parking standards". Those portions of the Planning and Zoning Commission minutes
are highlighted and attached as Exhibit B.
Following the Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing, the proposed MU-R-3-C
zone district was forwarded to City Council with a favorable recommendation for adoption.
Subsequently, staff presented a Bill for an Ordinance to City Council to create the MU-R-3-
C zone district and a public hearing was held on April 16, 2012. In the Council
Communication for the public hearing, staff summarized the details of the dimensional •
standards for the proposed MU-R-3-C zone district which included, "Remove land area per
•
•
•
residential unit requirement in favor of regulating density through maximum height limit and
minimum off-street parking standards". That portion of the Council Communication is
highlighted and attached as Exhibit C. Following the City Council public hearing on Apri l
16, 2012, Ordinance #23 of 2012 was approved on second reading, and the MU-R-3-C
zone district was created.
Based on the Planning and Zoning Commission minutes and the subsequent Council
Communication, it is clear that the intent of the MU-R-3-C Ordinance was to not have a
minimum lot width for multi-unit dwellings. In order to correct the discrepancy between the
minimum lot width required for the MU-R-3-C zone district in UDC Table 16-6-1.1 and
UDC Section 16-6-1.C.1, staff recommends the following amendments to the UDC.
• In UDC Section 16-6-1.C.1, remove MU-R-3-C from the heading. The minimum required
lot widths for the MU-R-3-C zone district would default to "None" per UDC Table 16-6-
1.1.
• In UDC Section 16-6-3:F.3 .b.(1 )(b), correct the reference to Sectionl 6-6-1.C.4 and
replace it with a reference to Section 16-6-1 .C.1. Remove MU-R-3-C from the sentence.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS:
In order to correct the discrepancies between the minimum lot widths required for the MU-
R-3-B and MU-R-3-C zone districts between UDC Table 16-6-1 .1 and UDC Section 16-6-
1.C.1, staff recommends the proposed UDC amendments that are attached as Exhibit D .
SUMMARY:
UDC section 16-6-1.C.1 was added as part of a UDC amendment in Ordinance #37 of
2008; and subsequently, the MU-R-3-C zone district was created by Ordinance #23 of
2012. Since then, it has come to the City's attention that errors where made that created
discrepancies in the minimum lot widths required for the MU-R-3-B and MU-R-3-C zone
districts between UDC Table 16-6-1.1 and UDC Section 16-6-1.C.1. After researching the
intent of the 2008 Ordinance related to impacts of front loaded garages and the 2012
Ordinance that created the MU-R-3-C zone district, it is clear in both cases that the intent of
the Ordinances was not to require a minimum lot width for multi-unit dwellings in the MU-
R-3-B and MU-R-3-C zone districts. The proposed amendments to the UDC will correct the
discrepancy between the two sections of the zoning code.
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -D
•
....
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
November 18, 2014
I. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called to
order at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Englewood Civic Center, Chair
Fish presiding.
Present:
Absent:
Staff:
....
Fish, Bleile, Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth
Townley (Excused), Madrid (Excused)
Alan White, Director, Community Development
Chris Neubecker, Senior Planner
Brook Bell, Planner II
Nancy Reid, Assistant City Attorney
11. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• November 4, 2014
•
Bleile moved;
Knoth seconded: TO APPROVE THE NOVEMBER 4, 2014, MINUTES
Chair Fish asked if there were any modifications or corrections. There were none.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Fish, Bleile, Brick, Kinton, Knoth, Roth
None
Freemire, King
Townley
Motion carried . ....
Ill. PUBLIC HEARING CASE #2014-06 MINIMUM LOT WIDTHS IN MU-R-3-B AND
MU-R-3-C ZONE DISTRICTS
Bleile moved;
Freemire seconded: TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CASE #2014-06 MINIMUM
LOT WIDTHS IN MU-R-3-B AND MU-R-3-C ZONE DISTRICTS
AYES:
NAYS:
Fish, Bleile, Brick, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth
None
Page 1 of4
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT: ....
Staff Report
Freemire
Townley
Brook Bell, Planner II, was sworn in. Mr. Bell reviewed the history of the case and the
discussion from the previous study session and public hearing. The proposed text
amendment will correct a discrepancy in the UDC (Unified Development Code) that
exists between table 16-6-1 .1 and UDC Section 16-6-1-C. He presented Exhibit A
illustrating the discrepancy. Staff recommends adding an exception to Section 16-6-
1-C for the MU-R-3-B zone district such that minimum lot width requirements do not
apply. The minimum lot width stated as "none" in the table will remain unchanged . ....
The discrepancy related to MU-R-3-C is similar in that the table 16-6-1.1 and the text
in Section 16-6-1-C.1 are contradictory. In order to correct the text, Mr. Bell proposes
that the text be amended to reflect that there is no minimum lot width requirement
in MU-R-3 -C.
• In UDC Section 16-6-1 C.1, remove MU-R-3-C from the heading. The minimum
required lot widths for the MU-R-3-C zone district would default to "None" per
UDC Table 16-6-1.1.
• In UDC Section 16-6-3:F.3.b.(1)(b), correct the reference to Section16-6-1.C.4 and
•
replace it with a reference to Section 16-6-1.C.1. Remove MU-R-3-C from the •
sentence.
Public Testimony ....
Jeremy Letkomiller, 2856 S. Lincoln Street, was sworn in . Mr. Letkomiller expressed
concern regarding the increase in redevelopment in the city, particularly the multi-
family units such as duplexes that are replacing single family homes. He feels that
the density is going to be too high to be sustainable . ....
Response
Mr. Bell explained that the amendment to the code will not affect residential
densities that were previously established in table 16-6-1.1. He reviewed the
requirements for the various zone districts in the city and the purpose of the hearing
to correct the inconsistency between the table and the text in the UDC that resulted
from an administrative error . ....
Bleile moved;
Knoth seconded: TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CASE #2014-06 MINIMUM
LOT WIDTHS IN MU-R-3-B AND MU-R-3-C ZONE DISTRICTS
AYES:
NAYS:
Fish, Bleile, Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth
None
Page 2 of 4 •
•
•
•
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
.....
None
Townley
Commissioner's Comments
.....
Brick -The integrity of the neighborhoods will remain intact and the Commission
has maintained the character of the neighborhoods that are affected by MU-R-3-B
and MU-R-3-C.
.....
King -These zone districts are historically higher density neighborhoods and agrees
with Mr. Brick .
.....
Knoth moved;
King seconded: TO APPROVE CASE #2014-06 MINIMUM LOT WIDTHS IN MU-R-3-B
AND MU-R-3-C ZONE DISTRICTS AND FORWARD TO CITY
COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION
AYES:
NAYS:
Fish, Bleile, Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth
None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Townley
Fish -Cleaning up the code is a good thing to do
Bleile -Agrees with Mr. Brick and is glad to receive public input. The
intention of the zoning initially was to create higher density areas and he is in favor
of the proposal as written.
Brick -Housekeeping issue that does not affect the zone area but will prevent
circumvention of the code in the future. The correction serves to maintain the
quality and character of the neighborhoods.
Motion passes. e
IV. PUBLIC FORUM
e v.
e
VI.
H
VII.
There were no members of the public present who wished to comment.
ATTORNEY'S CHOICE
Assistant City Attorney Reid did not have any comment.
STAFF'S CHOICE
Mr. Neubecker stated that the December 2nd meeting will be a holiday dinner
for the Commission and staff, beginning at 6:00 p.m. and the study session
topic will be work priorities for 2015.
COMMISSIONER'S CHOICE
Page 3 of 4
Freemire -The December 2"d meeting could be beneficial; the Commission has the •
opportunity to be visionary in shaping the future of the City. He encourages Staff to be
creative and bring ideas to the Commission to enable a prospective plan of action.
Fish -Agrees with Mr. Freemire, would like to discuss the Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Neubecker responded that he will provide an update to the Commissioners on the
progress of the projects and the December meeting is an opportunity to talk about ideas
for the future.
Brick -Interested in having the Superintendent of Englewood Schools attend a
meeting; Director White stated that it will probably be January or February. Mr. Brick
feels that education is a key component of the Comprehensive Plan.
The meeting adjourned at 7:40 p .m.
/s/ Julie Bailey , Recording Secretary
Page 4 of 4
•
•
•
•
•
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF CASE #2014-06
AMENDMENTS TO THE MINIMUM
LOT WIDTH REGULATIONS IN MU-R-3-C
AND MU-R-3-B ZONE DISTRICTS )
FINDINGS OF FACT,
CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS RELATING
TO THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
INITIATED BY:
Community Development Department
1000 Englewood Parkway )
Englewood, CO 80110
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF THE
CllY PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION
Commission Members Present: Fish, Bleile, Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth
Commission Members Absent: Townley
This matter was heard before the City Planning and Zoning Commission on November 4,
2014, and on November 18, 2014, in the City Council Chambers of the Englewood Civic
Center.
Testimony was received from staff. The Commission received notice of Public Hearing, the
Staff Report, and a copy of the proposed amendments to Title 16 Unified Development
Code which were incorporated into and made a part of the record of the Public Hearing.
After considering the statements of the witness and reviewing the pertinent documents, the
members of the City Planning and Zoning Commission made the following Findings and
Conclusions.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THAT the Public Hearing on the Unified Development Code (UDC) Title 16 Chapter 6
Development Standards, was brought before the Planning and Zoning Commission by
the Department of Community Development, a department of the City of Englewood.
2. THAT notice of the Public Hearing was published in the Englewood Herald on October
24, 2014, and on November 7, 2014. Notice of the Public Hearing was on the City of
Englewood website from October 10, 2014 to October 21, 2014 and from November
6, 2014 to November 18, 2014.
3. THAT the Staff report was made part of the record .
4. THAT testimony was received from the public at the Public Hearing held on November
18,2014. •
5. THAT a discrepancy exists in the UDC between the code text 16-6-1-C.1 and 16-6-
3:F.3.b. (1 )(b) and table 16-6-1.1 Summary of Dimensional Requirements for Principal
Structures.
6. THAT it was an oversight to include the MU-R-3-B zone district in the 2008 UDC
amendment that required a minimum lot width of 25 feet per unit for properties with
alley access, and 30 feet per unit for properties without alley access.
7. THAT adding an exception to the code text for zone district MU-R-3-B will clarify the
minimum lot width requirements and create consistency between the code text and
table 16-6-1 .1 Summary of Dimensional Requirements for Principal Structures.
CONCLUSIONS
1. THAT the proposed corrections to the Unified Development Code will result m
consistency in the code text and the corresponding table 16-6-1.1 Summary of
Dimensional Requirements for Principal Structures.
2. THAT the zoning regulations for zone districts MU-R-3-B and MU-R-3-C is intended to
encourage higher density development.
3 . THAT the original 2012 Ordinance creating the MU-R-3-C zone district was not
intended to impose a minimum lot width for multi-unit dwellings .
4. THAT removing MU-R-3-C from the heading of UDC Section 16-6-1.C.will clarify the
minimum lot width requirements and create consistency between the code text and
table 16-6-1.1 Summary of Dimensional Requirements for Principal Structures.
5. THAT the proposed amendment serves to maintain the quality and the character of the
neighborhoods in the City of Englewood.
6 . THAT the proposed changes are in conformance with Roadmap Englewood : 2003
Englewood Comprehensive Plan by supporting Redevelopment, Revitalization and
Reinvention.
DECISION
•
•
•
•
•
THEREFORE, it is the decision of the City Planning and Zoning Commission that Case
#2014-06 Minimum Lot Width in the MU-R-3-B and MU-R-3-C Zone Districts text
amendments should be referred to the City Council with a favorable recommendation.
The decision was reached upon a vote on a motion made at the meeting of the City
Planning and Zoning Commission on November 18, 2014, by Knoth, seconded by King,
which motion states:
AYES:
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
TO APPROVE CASE #2014-06 AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 16: UNIFIED
DEVELOPMENT CODE RELATED TO MINIMUM LOT WIDTHS IN MU-
R-3-B ANO MU-R-3-C ZONE DISTRICTS AS WRITTEN BE FORWARDED
FOR APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE
RECOMMENOA TION.
Bleile, Brick, Fish, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth
None
Townley
Motion carried.
These Findings and Conclusions are effective as of the meeting on November 18, 2014 .
BY ORDER OF THE CITY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Ron Fish, Chair
•
•
•
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 2014
COUNCIL BILL NO. 71
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER -------
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 16, CHAPTER 6, SECTIONS 1 AND 3, OF THE
ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE 2000 PERTAINING TO MINIMUM LOT WIDTHS FOR
MULTI-UNIT DWELLINGS IN THE MU-R-3-B AND MU-R-3-C ZONE DISTRICTS.
WHEREAS, errors were made related to the minimum lot widths for multi-unit dwellings
when Section 16-6-l(C)(l), was added as part of a UDC amendment in Ordinance No. 37, Series
of 2008; and
WHEREAS, the errors are discrepancies between UDC Table 16-6-1.1: Summary of
Dimensional Requirements, and UDC Section 16-6-l(C)(l) Multi-Unit Development Standards
for the MU-R-3-B and MU-R-3-C zone districts; and
WHEREAS, there was no minimum lot width required for a multi-unit dwelling in Table 16-
6-1.l; and
WHEREAS, Section 16-6-l(C)(l) requires a minimum lot width of "twenty-five feet (25') per
unit for properties with alley access", and "thirty feet (30') per unit" for properties with out alley
access which is a direct conflict with Table 16-6-1.1 EMC; and
WHEREAS, the intent of the 2008 Ordinance related to impacts of front loaded garages
makes it clear that the intent of the Ordinance was to not require a minimum lot width for multi-
unit dwellings in the MU-R-3-B and MU-R-3-C zone districts; and
WHEREAS, this proposed ordinance will amend the UDC and correct the discrepancy
between these two sections of the Zoning Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes amending
Title 16, Chapter 6, Section 1 entitled Dimensional Requirements of the Englewood Municipal Code
2000, to read as follows:
16-6: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
16-6-1: Dimensional Requirements
1
EDITORS NOTE: Title 16-6-1 (A) and (B), contain no changes and are therefore not
included here.
C. Additional Dimensional and Development Standards.
1. Multi-Unit Development Standards in R-2-A, R-2-B, MU-R-3-A and MU-R-3-B £m£i
},{[) R 3 G Districts.
a. Applicability. The following standards apply to all multi-unit dwellings
constructed or converted after the effective date of this Section.
b. Multi-unit dwellings existing on the effective Date ofthis Section and which
as of that date are not in compliance with standards established by this Section,
shall not be considered nonconforming due solely to the dwelling's
noncompliance with the standards of this Section. Such dwellings are
"grandfathered," and shall be considered legal, conforming structures for the
purposes of sale and development under this Title.
c. Property having rear alley access.
(1) Minimum lot width shall be twenty-five feet (25') feet per unit except in
the MU-R-3-B District the minimum lot width shall be per Table 16-6-
1.1 EMC.
(2) Driveway access from the public street shall be prohibited, except for:
(a) Comer lots where garage, carport or parking pad may be accessed
from the side street.
(b) Dwellings with four (4) or more units may have one driveway
accessing the street.
(3) Parking pads within the front yard or front setback shall be prohibited.
d. Property without rear alley access.
(1) Minimum lot width shall be thirty feet (30') per unit.,.; except in the MU-
R-3-B District the minimum lot width shall be per Table 16-6-1.1 EMC.
(2) Garages, carports and parking pads shall be off-set behind the front
building line of each unit by a minimum of five feet (5').
(3) Minimum separation between driveways or parking pads of attached
units shall be twenty feet (20').
(4) Maximum driveway and/or parking pad width within front yard or front
setback shall be ten feet (10') per unit.
( 5) The maximum garage door width on the front facade of the structure
shall be 9 feet per unit.
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
(6) A parking pad may be located in the front yard or front setback only
when a garage or carport is not provided.
(7) An opaque fence or wall shall be provided between driveways or parking
pads on adjacent properties.
(8) Units that provide attached garages behind the rear building line of the
principal structure may reduce the principal structure's rear setback to
ten feet (10').
(9) It is recognized that because of the wide variety of multi-unit
development options, the City Manager or designee may on a case-by-
case basis consider minor deviations to d (2) through (7) above,
whenever such deviations are more likely to satisfy the intent of this
subsection.
Section 2. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes amending
Title 2, Chapter 16, Section 3, Subsection F, entitled Stree ts and Vehicle Access and Circulation
of the Englewood Municipal Code 2000, to read as follows :
16-6-3: Streets and Vehicle Access and Circulation.
F.
EDITORS NOTE: Title 16-6-3 (A) through (E), contain no changes and are therefore not
included here .
Vehicle Access and Circulation .
1. Access to Public Roads. All new lots shall have direct or indirect access to a
dedicated public street, through one (1) or more access points approved by the City.
In addition to direct access to a dedicated public street, access may be provided
through private streets or through alleys .
a. No back-out driveways from any type of use shall be permitted onto an arterial
street.
b. No back-out driveways or back-out parking spaces from multi-unit residential
on sites with alley access, commercial, or industrial uses shall be permitted
onto a public street. This requirement shall not prohibit back-out driveways or
parking spaces onto an alley.
2. Traffic Impact Analysis. A traffic impact analysis (TIA) shall be required with
applications for development review and approval when trip generation during any
peak hour is expected to exceed one hundred (100) vehicles, based on traffic
generation estimates when trip generation during any peak hour is expected to
exceed one hundred (100) vehicles, based on traffic generation estimates of the
Institute of Transportation Engineers' Generation Manual (or any successor
publication). The City may also require a TIA for :
a. Any project that proposes access to a street with level of service (LOS) "D" or
below;
3
b.
c.
Any application for a rezoning;
Any case where the previous TIA for the property is more than two (2) years
old;
d. Any case where increased land use intensity will result in a fifteen percent
(15%) or greater increase in traffic generation; and
e. Any case in which the traffic engineer determines that a TIA should be
required because of other traffic concerns that may be affected by the proposed
development.
f. When access points are not defined or a Zoning Site Plan is not available at the
time the TIA is prepared, additional studies may be required when a Zoning
Site Plan becomes available or the access points are defined.
3. New Intersections and Curb-Cuts.
a. General Rules. The number of intersections and curb-cuts on streets and
highways shall be minimized consistent with the basic needs of ingress and
egress. Intersections and curb-cuts shall be designed to provide the greatest
safety for both pedestrians and motorists.
b. Driveways, Residential.
(1) One-Unit and Multi-Unit Dwellings Containing Up to Three (3) Units .
(a) The width of any driveway leading from the public street to a one-
unit dwelling, or multi-unit dwelling containing up to three (3)
units shall not exceed twenty feet (20') at its intersection with the
street.
(b) See also Section 10 0 lC.4 16-6-lCC)(l) EMC, "Multi-Unit
Development Standards in R-2-A, R-2-B, MU-R-3-A, and
MU-R-3-B, and MU R 3 C Districts," for additional driveway
standards that apply to multi-unit dwellings on properties with or
without alley access.
(c) See also Section 16-6-10.B . EMC, "Residential Design Standards
and Guidelines," for additional driveway standards that apply to
new residential development, including substantial expansions or
alterations of existing dwellings, in the R-1, R-2, and R-3 zone
districts.
(2) Multi-Unit Dwellings Containing Four (4) or More Units.
(a) The width of any entrance driveway to a multi-unit dwelling
containing four ( 4) or more units shall not exceed twenty-five
feet (25') at its intersection with the street, unless the applicant
can demonstrate that additional width is required to adequately
accommodate anticipated driveway volumes.
4
•
•
•
•
•
•
(b) In new multi-unit developments not located within MU-R-3-C,
M-1 , M-2 and M-0-2 districts containing ten (10) or more units,
vehicular access shall be spaced no closer than twenty-five feet
(25') to any adjacent property line. However, the City may
reduce this setback requirement to permit a single vehicular
access point that can serve two (2) adjacent properties or where
compliance with these requirements would deny vehicular
access to a property.
c. Driveways, Nonresidential. The location and size of driveways leading from
the public street to a nonresidential or mixed-use building is subject to the
following conditions:
(1) No portion of any driveway shall be closer than forty feet (40') to the
curb line of an intersecting street, or closer than ten feet ( 1 O') from a fire
hydrant, catch basin, or end of curb radius at corners .
(2) In new non-residential developments not located within MU-R-3-C, M-
l, M-2 , and M-0-2 districts, vehicular access shall be spaced no closer
than twenty-five feet (25') to any adjacent property line . However, the
City may reduce this setback requirement to permit a single vehicular
access point that can serve two (2) adjacent properties or where
compliance with these requirements would deny vehicular access to a
property .
(3) Only one (1) access per street frontage shall be permitted, unless a
Zoning Site Plan or traffic impact analysis shows, and the City agrees,
that additional access points are required to adequately accommodate
driveway volumes and that additional access will not be detrimental to
traffic flow .
(4) The width of any entrance driveway shall not exceed thirty feet (30')
measured along its intersection with the property line.
Section 3. Safety Clauses . The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this
Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Englewood, that it is
promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public, and that this Ordinance is necessary
for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and
welfare . The City Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the
proper legislative object sought to be obtained.
Section 3. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Ordinance or the
application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjudged by a court of
competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder
of this Ordinance or it application to other persons or circumstances .
Section 4 . Inconsistent Ordinances. All other Ordinances or portions thereof inconsistent or
conflicting with this Ordinance or any portion hereof are hereby repealed to the extent of such
inconsistency or conflict.
5
Section 5. Effect of repeal or modification. The repeal or modification of any provision of
the Code of the City of Englewood by this Ordinance shall not release, extinguish, alter, modify,
or change in whole or in part any penalty, forfeiture, or liability, either civil or criminal, which
shall have been incurred under such provision, and each provision shall be treated and held as
still remaining in force for the purposes of sustaining any and all proper actions, suits,
proceedings, and prosecutions for the enforcement of the penalty, forfeiture, or liability, as well
as for the purpose of sustaining any judgment, decree, or order which can or may be rendered,
entered, or made in such actions, suits, proceedings, or prosecutions.
Section 6. Penalty. The Penalty Provision of Section 1-4-1 EMC shall apply to each and
every violation of this Ordinance.
Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 15th day of December, 2014.
Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City's official newspaper on the 19th day of
December, 2014.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City's official website beginning on the 17th day of
December, 2014 for thirty (30) days .
Randy P. Penn, Mayor
ATTEST:
Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk
I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and passed on
first reading on the 15th day of December, 2014.
Loucrishia A. Ellis
6
•
•
•
..
• COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Date: Agenda Item: Subject:
January 5, 2015 11 a i Amendments to Title 16: Bulk Plane Requirements
Initiated By: Staff Source:
Community Development Department Brook Bell, Planner II
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Proposed amendments to Title 16: Unified Development Code (UDC) Bulk Plane Requirements were
presented to Council and discussed during a Study Session on November 3, 2014.
PREVIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing on October 21, 2014, to consider the
proposed amendments to Title 16: Unified Development Code. Two members of the public testified at the
public hearing in favor of the proposed amendments. Following discussion, the Commission voted 7 to 0 to
forward a favorable recommendation to City Council to approve proposed amendments to Title 16: Bulk
.Plane Requirements.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendation from the Community Development Department to adopt a Bill for an Ordinance
authorizing amendments to Title 16: Unified Development Code regarding Bulk Plane Requirements on
First Reading and to set January 20, 2015 as the date for a Public Hearing to consider testimony on the
proposed amendments.
BACKGROUND
Prior to the adoption of the Unified Development Code (UDC) in 2004, residential building mass was
regulated primarily by minimum setback, maximum height, and maximum lot coverage standards. With the
adoption of the UDC, bulk plane requirements were added to further regulate residential building mass.
The intent of the bulk plane regulations is "to ensure that new residential development, including additions
and expansions of existing dwellings, provides adequate light and privacy to neighboring properties. In
addition, the bulk plane requirements are intended to assure greater design compatibility in terms of
building mass and scale within Englewood neighborhoods".
The bulk plane creates an invisible tent-like boundary limiting the three dimensional space in which a
dwelling structure, including the roof, may occupy (with some exceptions). The current bulk plane
regulations apply to residential development of 4 units or less in the R-1-A, R-1-B, R-1-C, R-2-A, R-2-B, MU-R-
3-A, and MU-R-3-B zone districts. The bulk plane regulations do not apply to residential developments of 5
.or more units, or non-residential development, or accessory structures in the zone districts listed above. The
bulk plane regulations do not apply to any development in the MU-R-3-C, MU-B-1 , MU-B-2, M-1 , M-2, M-0-
2, 1-1, 1-2 or TSA zone districts. •
As residential development activity in the City of Englewood has increased, some architects, builders, and
real estate professionals have stated that the UDC's bulk plane regulations are too restrictive and hinder
new development. This is especially problematic for new duplexes and townhomes on 25 foot wide lots. It
should be noted that many cities have bulk plane regulations, including Denver, although their regulations
are less restrictive than Englewood's. The City of Littleton does not have any bulk plane regulations.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
Recently, staff has had more detailed discussions with architects and builders regarding how the current
bulk plane regulations affect the design, construction cost, and sale of new residential development and
expansions of existing dwellings. The specific issues and proposed amendments to the current bulk plane
regulations are listed below.
• Beginning Point of Bulk Plane 12 Feet Above Midpoint of Side Property Line -The current bulk plane
begins at a point 12 feet above the midpoint of the side property line and continues at a 45 degree
angle toward the center of the property. This results in the bulk plane intersecting with the side wall of
the house at an elevation of 1 7 feet for a house with a 5 foot setback. The market for most new homes
demands 9 or 10 foot ceilings on the first floor, and 8 or 9 foot ceilings on the second floor.
The current bulk plane does not accommodate these ceiling heights without recessing the first floor
joists into the foundation wall and using a low sloping ceiling towards the side wall on the second floor.
These construction techniques are not standard and increase costs for a builder. This issue becomes
more critical for duplexes and triplexes on 25 foot wide lots where the side units are limited to 20 feet •
in overall width. The potential loss of functional space in these multi-unit developments has deterred
some developers from building in Englewood.
Proposed Amendment to Beginning Point of Bulk Plane: Increase the beginning point of the bulk plane
from 12 feet above the midpoint of the side property line, to a point 1 7 feet above the midpoint of the
side property line; then continue at a 45 degree angle toward the center of the property. This results in
the bulk plane intersecting with the side wall of the house at an elevation of 22 feet for a house with a 5
foot setback. This will allow for 9 or 10 foot ceilings on the first floor, and 8 or 9 foot ceilings on the
second floor without requiring special construction techniques.
• Applicability of Bulk Plane in Different Zone Districts -Currently the bulk plane applies to residential
development of 4 units or less in the R-1-A , R-1-B, R-1-C , R-2-A, R-2 -B, MU-R-3-A, and MU-R-3-B zone
districts. The R-1-A zone requires a minimum of 75 feet of lot width and minimum 7 foot side setbacks.
The R-1-B zone requires a minimum 60 feet of lot width and minimum 5 foot side setbacks.
The R-1-A and R-1-B zone districts are intended to be less dense with wider lots and in some cases
wider side setbacks than the other residential zone districts. These wider lots with increased setbacks
are not impacted by the current bulk plane regulations as much as the other residential zone districts.
Proposed Amendment: Staff proposes to change the bulk plane only in the R-1-C, R-2-A , R-2-B , MU-R-3-
A, and MU-R-3-B zone districts. No change is proposed in the R-1-A and R-1-B zone districts. The
current UDC bulk plane that begins at a point 12 feet above the midpoint of the side property line is
consistent with Denver's "suburban house" regulations. Neighborhoods in Denver such as Platt Park, •
Washington Park, and Observatory Park (which are similar in density to many of Englewood's
•
•
•
•
neighborhoods) fall under the "urban house" zoning. Denver neighborhoods such as Wellshire,
University Hills, and Southern Hills fall under the "suburban house" zoning. The character of the City of
Englewood's R-1-A and R-1-B is more suburban and as such, staff recommends maintaining the current
UDC bulk plane that begins at a point 12 feet above the midpoint of the side property line for the R-1-A
and R-1-B zone districts.
Method of Measuring Grade -Currently the bulk plane is measured from the exist i ng grade (or ground
elevation) at the midpoint of each side property line. If the existing grade at the midpoint on one side
property line is different than the other side property line, then the resulting bulk planes are
asymmetrical when viewed from the front of the lot. When this occurs, most architects end up having to
comply with the more restrictive of the two bulk planes to avoid having an elevation change in the floor
of the house from side to side. Changing floor elevations adds construction costs and can compromise
the internal layout of the home.
Proposed Amendment to Method of Measuring Grade : Use the average existing grade of the midpoints
of the side property lines to establish a base plane for both bulk planes.
Method of Measuring Maximum Side Wall Height -The maximum side wall height is currently
measured at the point where the bottom of the soffit or eave intersects the side wall of the house. This
approach penalizes certain roof framing profiles while rewarding others without regard to the intent of
the bulk plane.
Proposed Amendment to Method of Measuring Maximum Side Wall Height: Staff proposes to measure
the side wall height at the point where the side wall of the house intersects the top roof framing
member (roof sheathing). This approach is better aligned with the intent of the bulk plane and treats
various roof framing profiles more equitably. A clarification for parapet walls (a short protective wall
above a flat roof) will also be made that requires the top of the parapet wall to meet the bulk plane.
Lastly, an exception for rooftop patio railings will be added so that a railing may extend into the bulk
plane a maximum of 42 inches provided it is at least 75% open or transparent.
SUMMARY
The City of Englewood is experiencing increased demand and new interest in in-fill development. Staff has
received feedback from architects, builders, and real estate professionals on the restrictive nature of the
current bulk plane requirements in the UDC. Denver's less restrictive bulk plane regulations, and Littleton's
lack of any bulk plane restrictions, may be steering some new development away from the City of
Englewood. In order to create a competitive environment more conducive to redevelopment, the Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends the proposed UDC amendments which are detailed in the attached
Bill for an Ordinance.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Residential redevelopment will generate additional revenue incrementally from increased building and use
taxes and through increased property taxes based on higher property valuations.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 21, 2014
•
Planning and Zoning Commission Findings of Fact -October 21 , 2014
Bill for an Ordinance
•
•
e
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
OCTOBER 21, 2014
I. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m.
in the City Council Chambers of the Englewood Civic Center, Vice Chair King presiding.
Present: Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth (arrived 7:03), Roth, Townley, Madrid (arrived
7:06)
Absent:Fish (Excused), Bleile (Excused)
Staff:
e
Alan White, Director, Community Development
Chris Neubecker, Senior Planner
Brook Bell, Planner II
Dugan Comer, City Attorney's Office
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• October 7, 2014
Brick moved;
Roth seconded: TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 7, 2014, MINUTES
Vice Chair King asked if there were any modifications or corrections. There were none.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Motion carried. e
Brick, King, Kinton, Roth, Townley
None
Freemire
Fish, Bleile, Knoth (arrived 7:03)
Ill. FINDINGS OF FACT CASE #2012-07 PUD PROCESS AMENDMENTS
Roth moved;
Freemire seconded: TO APPROVE FINDINGS OF FACT FOR CASE #2012-07 PUD PROCESS
AMENDMENTS
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
·EJ
Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Roth, Townley
None
None
Fish, Bleile, Knoth (arrived 7:03)
Ill. PUBLIC HEARING CASE #2014-05 BULK PLANE REGULATION AMENDMENTS
• Townley moved;
Page 1 of 7
Freemire seconded: To open the Public Hearing for Case #2014-05 Bulk Plane Regulation
Amendments
AYES:
NAYS:
Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth, Townley
None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Fish, Bleile
Motion passes.
El
Staff Presentation
Brook Bell, Planner II with the Community Development Department, was sworn in. Mr. Bell
reviewed the proposed amendments that were previously discussed in the study session September
16, 2014. Prior to the adoption of the Unified Development Code in 2004, building mass was
constrained by setbacks, height and lot coverage. With the adoption of the UDC, bulk plane
requirements were added at that time. The bulk plane is a three dimensional "tent" that contains a
structure. The current regulations apply to residential structures with four (4) or fewer units in the R-
1-A, R-1-B, R-1-C, R-2-A, R-2-B, MU-R-3-A, and MU-R-3-B zone districts.
El
Over the last few years, feedback from architects, builders and developers has been that the bulk
plane is too restrictive to permit reasonable redevelopment with standard construction techniques.
The proposed amendments seek to resolve issues related to the bulk plane: e
1) Beginning point of Bulk Plane 12 Feet Above Midpoint of Side Property Line
•
a. Staff proposes that the bulk plane begin at a point 1 7 feet above the midpoint of the •
side property line and continue at a 45 degree angle toward the center of the
property.
2) Applicability of Bulk Plane in Different Zone Districts
a. The character of the City of Englewood's R-1-A and R-1-B is more suburban and as
such, staff recommends maintaining the current UDC bulk plane that begins at a
point 12 feet above the midpoint of the side property line for these zone districts.
The increased height of the bulk plane would apply to zones R-1-C, R-2-A, R-2-B,
MU-R-3-A, and MU-R-3-B.
3) Method of Measuring the Grade
a. The average height of the existing grade measured at the mid-point of the side lot
lines would be used to establish the base plane from which the side wall height
would be measured.
4) Method of Measuring Maximum Side Wall Height
a. Staff proposes to measure the side wall height at the point where the side wall of the
house intersects the roof framing member (roof sheathing).
Staff recommends that the Commission forward the proposed amendments to City Council for
aiioval.
Mr. Brick asked if the citizens of Englewood received enough notice to be aware of the proposed
UDC amendment. Mr. Bell responded that the appropriate postings were made and to his
knowledge there were no additional press releases or other notifications of the hearing. El .
Page 2 of 7 •
•
•
•
Mr. Knoth inquired about odd size lots in R-1-A and R-1-B, specifically narrow lots and whether or
not there would be accommodation for those lots since the amendment would not affect those
zone districts. Mr. Bell replied that the option of pursuing a variance remains for lots with unusual
dimensions. Mr. Knoth asked if that variance would be administrative and Mr. Bell responded that
the matter of a variance would go before the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. e
Mr. Freemire asked what the difference in home values would be for a single family home in
Englewood should a house be removed and replaced with a new home. Mr. Bell responded that
his sense is that the new homes are much larger than the existing homes and would be considerably
more expensive. The market for duplexes and triplexes is very strong. e
Mr. Bell pointed out that there is not a blackline version of the code provided but that per the
Commission's request, the proposed changes are outlined in the staff memo with details of staff's
recommendations of how to address each item. e
Public Comment
Eric Bennett, 2 7 40 South Delaware Street, was sworn in. Mr. Bennett currently owns a property
with an 800 square foot home adjacent to a tri-plex that was built prior to the adoption of the UDC.
He would like to redevelop his property with a duplex unit that would sell for approximately
$450,000-475,000 per unit. This redevelopment would represent an increase in taxes to the City of
EQewood as well as increased property value for the community.
Bill McVey, 2059 Eudora Street, Denver, was sworn in. Mr. McVey is a real estate developer. He
recently purchased a home at 2835 South Sherman with the intention of scraping the house and
building a duplex. He believes the units will sell for $550,000-575,000 each. The bulk plane
affected his development because of the sloping nature of the lot and hampered his ability to build
the duplex as it was designed. He supports the proposed code amendment and feels that he will
continue to redevelop properties in Englewood if the less restrictive bulk plane regulations are
adopted.
E1
Freemire moved;
Knoth seconded : TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CASE #2014-05 BULK PLANE
REGULATION AMENDMENTS
AYES: Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth, Townley
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Fish, Bleile
Motion passes.
H
Brick moved;
Freemire seconded: TO APPROVE CASE #2014-05 BULK PLANE REGULATION
AMENDMENTS AS WRITIEN AND FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL
WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION
El
Discussion
Page 3 of 7
Mr. Roth explained that the purpose of the bulk plane regulation in the UDC is to control the scale
of new development and reduce the effects of shading on the neighboring properties. Englewood
was originally developed as a suburban community. Areas of Englewood are evol v ing into
neighborhoods with more urban character. He supports the idea but has reservations about
including R-1-C. He feels that by adopting liberal development standards there will be an issue
when residents become aware of the change in building s izes. His desire is to see the amended
regulation applied to R-2 and the more dense a reas and not reach so deeply into the
nOhborhoods .
Mr. Brick asked where the majority of R-1-C properties are in the City and how many homes fall
under the R-1-<: designation. Mr. Roth responded that the majority of the homes in the City are in
R-1-C and described the boundaries.
El
Discussion about when the Comprehensive Plan will be enacted. [Secretary's Note: The
Comprehensive Plan is scheduled to be completed in August/September 2015, with adoption
following. Adoption of other plans and code changes to implement the recommendations of the
Comprehensive Plan may take longer.]
El
Mr. Freemire estimated that the R-1-C is 60% of the City. He has personally seen property values
increase in his neighborhood. His home is larger than those in the surrounding area and has not
had an adverse effect on adjacent homes. Mr. Freemire expressed that he feels the current code
amendment proposal is prudent based on market conditions.
•
Mr. Roth expressed concern that the proposed code amendment will create additional non-
conforming structures in the City. u •
Roth moved;
Brick seconded : TO APPROVE CASE #2014-05 BULK PLANE REGULATION
AMENDMENTS WITH THE EXCLUSION OF THE R-1-C ZONE
DISTRICT.
Discussion
El
Mr. Freemire commented that in his past experience where the decision was made to be market-
based by creating an environment that was friendly to business and development, tax revenues
increased incrementally and improvements were made to existing neighborhoods while fixed costs
oeroviding services remained relatively stable.
Mr. Brick commented that with the process of developing the revised Comprehensive Plan, the City
will have an opportunity to hear from a larger segment of the population . If the revision is not
made now, it will take longer to address R-1-C. He feels that if the case is presented before the
citizens there will be understanding of the benefits to R-1-C and to the City.
E1
Mr. King discussed the difference in redevelopment activity in Denver north of Yale and the amount
of redevelopment that is taking place across Englewood's border. Denver revised their regulations
and development activity increased. Building cycles are relatively short-lived and this is an
otjortunity to take advantage of the market.
VOTE ON AMENDMENT TO THE ORIGINAL MOTION TO EXCLUDE R-1-C FROM THE
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE UDC:
Page 4 of 7 •
•
•
•
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
El
Brick, Roth
Freemire, King, Kinton , Knoth, Townley
None
Fish, Bleile
Brick -Yes, he agrees with the proposed amendment to the bulk plane but also believes that three
years isn't too long to wait to make changes. He would like to see more of the community involved
in the decision, specifically in the R-1-C. With the (coincidental) public engagement activities
related to the Comprehensive Plan, there will be opportunity for the public to learn about the
change.
B
Freemire -No, the issue of the bulk plane will not necessarily be on the agenda for the
Comprehensive Plan .
King -No
Kinton -No, although more public participation would be ideal, it will most likely not happen.
Knoth -No
Roth -Yes
Townley-No
Motion failed.
Q
E
Vote on original motion:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
El
TO APPROVE CASE #2014-05 BULK PLANE REGULATION AMENDMENTS
AS WRITTEN AND FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A
FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION
Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth, Townley
None
None
Fish, Bleile
Mr. Brick -Yes , cited Section 5 and Objective 2.1 under housing in Section 5 of the
Comprehensive Plan regarding housing. This amendment is in alignment with the Comprehensive
Plan.
Freemire -Yes, this is a way to improve the tax base and the future appearance of Englewood, to
allow the market to prevail and not have a government that stands in the way thereof.
E
King -Yes, it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will bring in a mix of different kinds of
housing with appropriate amenities for families . e
Kinton -Yes, for the reasons previously stated and this change will promote and spur development. e
Knoth -Yes, market forces should drive these decisions and right now the market has stopped at
Yale and he would like to see it cross over into Englewood.
El
Page 5 of 7
Roth -Yes, it is something that is needed in the higher density areas although there are still
c0cerns about R-1-C but all in all it is a positive change. •
Townley -Yes, this amendment supports all three R's of the 2003 Comprehensive Plan
Redevelopment, Revitalization and Reinvention.
Motion passes.
El
IV. PUBLIC FORUM
There were no comments by the public.
V. ATTORNEY'S CHOICE e Attorney did not have any comments.
VI. STAFF'S CHOICE
Director White -The Commissioners are scheduled for an informal meeting with the consultants for
the Comprehensive Plan next Monday night, October 27th at 7:30 p.m. at Englewood Civic Center
in a conference room on the 3rd floor. There will be several more opportunities to participate in the
future, such as the public meeting to be held November 12th. Mr. Brick asked if it would be
possible to come early to listen to other sessions; Director White stated that because 3 or more
members from a board or commission will be present, the meetings are considered public.
El
Ms. Townley asked what kind of information the consultants are hoping to obtain from the
Commissioners. Director White responded that the sessions are fairly informal and there is no
preparation necessary on the part of the Commissioners. Mr. Kinton asked if the three plans are
separate or will they be conducted concurrently. Director White explained that staff and
Consultants are attempting to combine the three into one via the website EnglewoodForward.org
since the plans are interrelated. The website will provide an opportunity for the public to express
their thoughts and opinions on a variety of topics related to each project. The three projects are the
Comprehensive Plan, Light Rail Next Steps Study and the Kaiser Walk and Wheel study. The
estions from the consultants will cover all three topics.
Mr. Bell supplied a handout with the UDC chart of uses for MU-R-3-C. He explained that in 2012,
staff was considering a "phase 2" rezoning in the Medical District area encompassing an area
between Girard Avenue and Floyd Avenue. Staff has discovered a conflict in the code regarding
minimum lot width in the hospital district zoning and the MU-R-3-C zoning code. When the code
was adopted by City Council, the text was changed slightly and was codified. A public hearing has
been scheduled for November 4th to address the issue.
El
Mr. Knoth asked if the same amendment should be made for the MU-R-3-B zone district because
the same apparent conflict exists in the Code. Staff will research the subject further and present
information to the Commission either at the Public Hearing November 4 th or in a study session if
necessary.
Page 6 of 7
•
•
•
•
•
VII. COMMISSIONER'S CHOICE
El
Freemire -Appreciates opposing viewpoints and that the end result is agreement among the
Commissioners.
El
Townley -Thanked the Commissioners for their input for her Leadership Practices Inventory; she
has received a report with information on what she is doing correctly and areas she needs to
ii}rove.
Brick -The RiNo (River North Arts District) field trip was inspiring and the Comprehensive Plan will
provide opportunity to build something similar in Englewood. He thanked Staff for arranging the to
King -Thanked the Commissioners for their cooperation even when there are differing opinions.
The meeting adjourned at 8:18 p.m.
,_,/s..._/__.l=u"""I i e=-=B=a"""il e=-y..__,. Recording Secretary
Page 7 of 7
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF CASE #2014-05
AMENDMENTS TO BULK PLANE
REGULATIONS
FINDINGS OF FACT,
CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS RELATING
TO THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
INITIATED BY:
Community Development Department
1 000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, CO 80110
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF THE
CITY PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION
Commission Members Pr esent: Brick, Fre emire, King, Kinton, Knoth , Roth , To wn le y
Commission Members Absent: Bleile, Fish
This matter was heard before the City Planning and Zoning Commission on October 21,
2014, in the City Council Chambers of the Englewood Civic Center.
Testimony was received from staff. The Commission received noti ce of Public Hearin g,
the Staff Report, and a copy of the proposed amendments to Title 16 Unified
Development Code which were incorporated into and made a part of the record of the
Public Hearing .
After considering the statements of th e witness and reviewing th e pertinent documents,
the members of the City Pl anning and Zoning Commission mad e the following Findin gs
and Conclusions.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THAT the Publi c Hearing on the Unified De ve lopment Code (UDC) Title 16 Chapter
6-6-1 Bulk Plane Requirements, was brought before the Planning Commission by the
Department of Community Development, a department of the City of Englewood.
2. THAT notice of the Public Hearing was published in t he Engl ewood Herald on
October 10, 2014, and notice of the Public Hearing was on the City of Englewood
website from October 10, 2014 to October 21, 2014 .
3. THAT the Staff report was made part of the record.
•
•
•
4. THAT The City of Englewood is experiencing increased demand and interest in
• redevelopment of older residential properties.
•
•
5. THAT the revision to the UDC would increase the height of the bulk plane.
6. THAT two members of the general public testified during the October 21, 2014,
public hearing in favor of the proposed code amendments, and indicated that the
proposed code amendments would allow greater flexibility for building in Englewood.
7. THAT the revision to the UDC is necessary to meet market demand for taller ceilings
inside new homes.
8. THAT the revision to the UDC will allow a greater variety of housing to be constructed
in the City of Englewood.
9 . THAT some of the recent new construction projects in the City have required the use
of special construction techniques that limit ceiling height on the second floor and
cost more to build.
10. THAT some neighboring communities have changed their bulk plane regulations and
have seen an increase in new residential construction .
CONCLUSIONS
1. THAT the proposed amendment to the UDC will encourage building and
redevelopment of new homes in the city.
2. THAT redevelopment activity should result in increased tax collections.
3. THAT the proposed code changes wi 11 faci I itate development by allowing greater
flexibility in design.
4. THAT the proposed code amendments wi 11 allow the demands of the private real
estate market to prevai I.
5. THAT the proposed changes are in conformance with Roadmap Englewood: 2003
Englewood Comprehensive Plan by supporting Redevelopment, Revitalization and
Reinvention .
DECISION
THEREFORE, it is the decision of the City Planning and Zoning Commission that Case
#2014-05 Bulk Plane Requirements amendments should be referred to the City Council
with a favorable recommendation.
The decision was reached upon a vote on a motion made at the meeting of the City
Planning and Zoning Commission on October 21, 2014, by Brick, seconded by Freemire,
which motion states:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN :
ABSENT:
CASE #2074-05 AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 76: UNIFIED
DEVELOPMENT CODE RELATED TO BULK PLANE REQUIREMENTS
AS WRITTEN BE FORWARDED FOR APPROVAL TO CITY
COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION.
Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth, Townley
None
None
Bleile, Fish
Motion carried.
These Findings and Conclusions are effective as of the meeting on October 21, 2014.
R OF THE CITY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
hair
•
•
•
•
•
•
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 2015
BY AUTHORITY
COUNCIL BILL NO . 1
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER -------
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 16, CHAPTER 6, SECTION 1, SUBSECTION G, OF
THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE 2000 PERTAINING TO BULK PLANE
REQUIREMENTS.
WHEREAS, the intent of the bulk plane regulations is to ensure that new residential
development, including additions and expansions of existing dwellings, provides adequate light
and privacy to neighboring properties. In addition, the bulk plane requirements are intended to
assure greater design compatibility in terms of building mass and scale within Englewood
neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, the bulk plane creates an invisible tent-like boundary limiting the three
dimensional space which a dwelling structure, including the roof, may occupy (with some
exceptions); and
WHEREAS, as residential development activity in the City of Englewood has increased, some
architects, builders , and real estate professionals have stated that the UDC's bulk plane
regulations are too restrictive and hinder new development. This is especially problematic for
new duplexes and town homes on twenty-five foot wide lots; and
WHEREAS, the current bulk plane begins at a point twelve feet above the midpoint of the
side property line and continues at a forty-five degree angle toward the center of the property.
This results in the bulk plane intersecting with the side wall of the house at an elevation of
seventeen feet for a house with a five foot setback. The market for most new homes demands
nine or ten foot ceilings on the first floor, and eight or nine foot ceilings on the second floor; and
WHEREAS, this proposed change to the beginning point of bulk plane increases the
beginning point of the bulk plane from twelve feet above the midpoint of the side property line to
seventeen feet; then continues at a forty-five degree angle toward the center of the property. This
results in the bulk plane intersecting with the side wall of the house at an elevation of twenty-two
feet for a house with a five foot setback. This will allow for nine or ten foot ceilings on the first
floor, and eight or nine foot ceilings on the second floor without requiring special construction
techniques; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance changes the bulk plane only in the R-1-C, R-2-A, R-2-B,
MU-R-3-A, and MU-R-3-B zone districts; and
1
WHEREAS, the bulk plane height will remain at twelve feet in R-1-A and R-1-B zone
districts, because those districts have wider lots and set backs to meet the current bulk plane
request; and
WHEREAS, the bulk place is currently measured from the existing grade (or ground
elevation) at the midpoint of each side property line; and
WHEREAS , the proposed change to this method of measuring grade uses the average existing
grade of the midpoints of the side property lines in all zone districts; and
WHEREAS, the maximum side wall height is currently measured at the point where the
bottom of the soffit or eave intersects the side wall of the house in all zone districts; and
WHEREAS, the proposed change to the method of measuring maximum side wall height will
measure the side wall height at the point where the side wall of the house intersects the top roof
framing member in all zone districts; and
WHEREAS, the Englewood Planning and Zoning Commission recommended these changes
to allow more flexibility for a mix of housing with a minimal impact on adjacent properties.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes amending
Title 16, Chapter 6, Section 1, Subsection G, entitled Bulk Plane Requirements, of the Englewood
Municipal Code 2000 , to read as follows:
16-6-1: Dimensional Requirements .
EDITORS NOTE: Title 16-6-1 (A) through (F), contain no changes and are therefore not
included here .
G. Bulk Plane Requirements.
1. Intent. The bulk plane requirements in this subsection are intended to ensure that new
residential development, including additions and expansions of existing dwellings,
provides adequate light and privacy to neighboring properties. In addition, the bulk
plane requirements are intended to assure greater design compatibility in terms of
building mass and scale within Englewood neighborhoods.
2. Applicability and Exceptions.
a. Applicability. Except as exempt by this subsection, the bulk plane requirements
in this subsection shall apply to:
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
( 1) All new residential development of four C 4) dwelling units or less in the
R-1-A. R-1-B. R-1-C. R-2-A. R-2-B. MU-R-3-A. and MU-R-3-B zone
districts: sahjeet to the Residential Design Standards aBd GHidelines in
Seetion 16 6 10 .B. EMC;
(2) All new residential development on legal, nonconforming lots that have lot
widths less than the minimum required by the applicable zone district; and
(3) All new residential development on small lots and urban lots.
b. Exceptions.
(1) The bulk plane requirements in this subsection shall not apply to new
residential developments of five (5) or more units. or non-residential
development. or accessorv structures in the R-1-A. R-1-B. R-1-C. R-2-A.
R-2-B. MU-R-3-A. and MU-R-3-B zone districts. in the MU "B 1, MU "B
2, M 1, M 2, M 0 2, or TSA distriets. The bulk plane requirements in this
subseetion shall not apply to struetl:H'es or portions of struetmes e~•empt
from the H'l:aJEimum height limits, as speeified in subseetion 16 6 1.E.1
EMC. The bulk plane requirements in this subsection shall not apply to
any development in the MU-R-3-C. MU-B-1. MU-B-2. M-1. M-2. M-0-2.
I-1. I-2 or TSA zone districts .
(2) Dormers with window(s) may partially protrude through the bulk plane
defined below for a maximum cumulative length of fifteen (15) linear feet,
measured horizontally at the point of intersection with the bulk plane, and
provided the vertical height of a dormer window does not extend above the
height of the ridgeline of the roof surface from which the dormer
protrudes.
(3) Eaves may extend up to twenty-four inches (24") into the bulk plane,
provided it does not project further into a side setback than the maximum
projection allowed by 16-6-1 :F5(b)(l). The extension shall be measured
horizontally from the building wall to the furthest extent of the eave.
( 4) Gutters may extend into the bulk plane, regardless of whether the eave
projects into the bulk plane.
ill Chimneys may extend vertically into the bulk plane a maximum of ten feet
ilQ:1
3
!fil Patio or deck railings may extend vertically into the bulk plane a maximum
of forty-two inches ( 42") if the railing is at least seventy-five percent
(75%) open or transparent.
3. Bulk Plane Requirements. Except as specifically excepted in subsection Gi,21, above,
no part of any structure subject to these bulk plane requirements (including air
conditioner, elevator penthouses, and other mechanical equipment) shall project
through the following defined bulk planes, which define a building envelope for the
subject lot:
a. For all applicable zone districts . the base plane for the vertical measurement of
the bulk plane shall be established by taking the average of the existing grades of
the midpoints of the two side property lines.
b_,_ The maximum side wall height shall be measured at the point where the side
wall of the structure intersects the highest roof framing member (tvoically roof
sheathing). The top of any parapet wall shall not extend beyond the defined bulk
plane.
a.
R-1-A and R-1-B Zone Districts.
ill A horizontal line that is located directly above the side lot line and
which passes through a point twelve feet (12') above the midjloiftt of
such side lot line base plane described in paragraph (a), above; and
The intersecting lines that extend over the lot at a pitch of 12: 12
(45-degree angle) from the horizontal lines defined in paragraph W
!£lill above.
d. R-1-C. R-2-A. R-2-B. MU-R-3-A. AND MU-R-3-B Zone Districts.
ill A horizontal line that is located directly above the side lot line and
which passes through a point seventeen feet Cl 7') above the base plane
described in paragraph (a) above: and
ill The intersecting lines that extend over the lot at a pitch of 12: 12 ( 45-
degree angle) from the horizontal lines defined in (d)(l) above.
4
•
•
•
• Figure 16-6(3): Bulk Plane
•
•
5
D
Figure 16-6(3): Bulk Plane
Maximum Height
I c
~ Property Line
I
li 1~450
A !
E Base Plane
8 Beginning point of Bulk Plane shall be:
• 12' above Base Plane for R-1-A and R-1-B Districts.
• 17' above Base Plane for R-1-C, R-2-A. R-2-B . MU-R-3-A and
MU-R-3-B zone districts .
~ Side setback varies by zone district and lot tvpe, see table 16-6-1 .1 EMC.
,Q Maximum Side wall height (A+B=C). where side wall of structure
intersects the highest roof framing member.
Q Maximum height of structure, see Table 16-6-1 .1 EMC .
~ Base Plane. average existing grade of the two side property line midpoints.
Commentary to Figure 16-6(3) Bulk Plane [above]: The shaded portion of the illustration above
depicts the defined bulk plane, which must contain the entire dwelling structure (with limited
exceptions for projecting dormers., f:ffld chimneys. and railings). The bulk plane is measured at a
forty-five degree (45°) angle from a horizontal lin e located directly above each side lot line
and which passes through a point twelve feet (12') above the base plane in the R-1-A and R-1-B
zone districts. or seventeen feet 0 7') above the base plane in the R-1-C. R-2-A. R-2-B. MU-R-3-
6
•
•
•
•
•
•
A and MU-R-3 B zone districts midpoint &jsHch side let line. Thefifteenfeet (15/ •·erticeJ
height shevm in the ilhtstffltien indicc1tes thepei11t '>'11'1ere the hHlkpkme in this su1Hipk irwlines
tewerd the center &jthe l<Jt, eccebl:ntingfer fl: three feet (3/ side setheck l'e<fbl:i."f!d in seveYfl:i &f
the residentiel zene districts. The maximum side wall height is the point where the side wall of
the structure intersects the highest roof framing member.
Section 2. Safety Clauses. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this
Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Englewood, that it is
promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public, and that this Ordinance is necessary
for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and
welfare. The City Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the
proper legislative object sought to be obtained.
Section 3. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Ordinance or the
application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjudged by a court of
competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder
of this Ordinance or it application to other persons or circumstances.
Section 4. Inconsistent Ordinances. All other Ordinances or portions thereof inconsistent or
conflicting with this Ordinance or any portion hereof are hereby repealed to the extent of such
inconsistency or conflict.
Section 5. Effect of repeal or modification. The repeal or modification of any provision of
the Code of the City of Englewood by this Ordinance shall not release, extinguish, alter, modify,
or change in whole or in part any penalty, forfeiture, or liability, either civil or criminal, which
shall have been incurred under such provision, and each provision shall be treated and held as
still remaining in force for the purposes of sustaining any and all proper actions, suits,
proceedings, and prosecutions for the enforcement of the penalty, forfeiture, or liability, as well
as for the purpose of sustaining any judgment, decree, or order which can or may be rendered,
entered, or made in such actions, suits, proceedings, or prosecutions.
Section 6. Penalty. The Penalty Provision of Section 1-4-1 EMC shall apply to each and
every violation of this Ordinance.
Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 5th day of January, 2015.
Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City's official newspaper on the 9th day of
January, 2015 .
7
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City's official website beginning on the 7th day of
January, 2015 for thirty (30) days.
Randy P . Penn, Mayor
ATTEST:
Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk
I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and passed on
first reading on the 5th day of January, 2015 .
Loucrishia A. Ellis
8
•
•
•