Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-01-20 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet1. Call to Order. 2. Invocation. 3. Pledge of Allegiance . 4. Roll Call. Agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Englewood City Council Tuesday, January 20, 2015 7:30 pm Englewood Civic Center -Council Chambers 1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, CO 80110 5. Consideration of Minutes of Previous Session. a. Minutes from the Regular City Council Meeting of January 5, 2015. 6. Recognition of Scheduled Public Comment. (This is an opportunity for the public to address City Council. There is an expectation that the presentation will be conducted in a respectful manner. Council may ask questions for clarification, but there will not be any dialogue. Please limit your presentation to five minutes.) a. Ken Haraldsen, an Englewood resident, will be present to update Council on his trip to Europe for the 70th Anniversary of the Battle of the Bulge . b . Drew Gaiser will be present to address Council regarding the Englewood Fire Department. c. Jeremy Letkomiller, an Englewood resident, will be present to address Council regarding the Englewood Fire Department. Please note : If you have a disability and need auxiliary .aids or services, please notify the City of Englewood (303-762-2405) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed . . · Englewood City Council Agenda January 20, 2015 Page 2 7. Recognition of Unscheduled Public Comment. (This is an opportunity for the public to address City Council. There is an expectation that the presentation will be conducted in a respectful manner. Council may ask questions for clarification, but there will not be any dialogue. Please limit your presentation to three minutes. Time for unscheduled public comment may be limited to 45 minutes, and if limited, shall be continued to General Discussion.) Council Response to Public Comment. 8. Communications, Proclamations, and Appointments. a. Letter from Beverly Bradshaw announcing her resignation from the Englewood Housing Authority. b. A resolution recommending the appointment of Paula Grimes to the Englewood Housing Authority. 9. Consent Agenda Items a. Approval of Ordinances on First Reading. b. Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading . c. Resolutions and Motions. 10. Public Hearing Items. a. A public hearing to gather input on Council Bill No. 1, authorizing amendments to Title 16: Unified Development Code regarding Bulk Plane Requirements. 11 . Ordinances, Resolutions and Motions. a. Approval of Ordinances on First Reading. i. Council Bill No. 2 -Recommendation from the Community Development Department to adopt a bill for an ordinance authorizing an amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement with the Regional Transportation District for cost sharing for operation of the "Art" shuttle for 2015 . Staff Source: Harold J. Stitt, Senior Planner. b. Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading. i. Council Bill No. 69, authorizing amendments to Title 16: Unified Development Code regarding Official Zoning Map Amendments (Rezoning) and Planned Unit Developments. Please note : If you have a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City of Englewood (303·762-2405) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed. Englewood City Council Agenda Janu a ry 20, 2015 Page 3 ii. Council Bill No. 71, authorizing amendments to Title 16: Unified Development Code regarding Minimum Lot Width for Multi-Unit Dwellings in the MU-R-3-B and M-U-R-3-C Zone Districts. c. Resolutions and Motions. i. Recommendation from Fire Department to adopt a resolution authorizing the application for a Firefighter Safety and Disease Prevention Grant from the Colorado Division of Fire Prevention and Control for the purchase of Thermal lmager Cameras. Staff Source: Andrew Fox, Acting Assistant Chief of Support Services. ii. Recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Department to approve a resolution supporting the City's grant application to Arapahoe County Open Space for Park Gateway Enhancements Phase I. Staff Source: Jerrell Black, Director of Parks and Recreation and Dave lee, Manager of Open Space. iii. Recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Department to approve a resolution supporting the City's grant application to Arapahoe County Open Space for River Run Trailhead Phase I. Staff Source: Jerrell Black, Director of Parks and Recreation and Joe Sack, Recreation Manager. iv. Recommendation from the Police Department to approve, by motion, the purchase of a 2015 Ford Police Interceptor Vehicle through a State of Colorado bid. (Conditional upon approval of 11 c v). Staff Source: Jeff Sanchez, Deputy Police Chief and Pat White, Fleet Manager. v. Recommendation from the Finance and Administrative Services Department to approve a resolution authorizing a transfer and supplemental appropriation of funds for additional costs of obtaining and upgrading a 2015 Ford Police Interceptor Vehicle. Staff Source: Frank Gryglewicz, Finance and Administrative Services. 12. General Discussion. a. Mayor's Choice. b. Council Members' Choice. i. A resolution authorizing wage and benefit adjustments for the Municipal Judge. 13 . City Manager's Report. 14. City Attorney's Report. 15 . Adjournment. Please note : If you have a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City of Englewood (303-762-2405) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed. NAME PUBLIC COMMENT ROSTER AGENDA ITEM 7 UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENT January 20, 2015 PLEASE LIMIT YOUR PRESENTATION TO THREE MINUTES ADDRESS TOPIC (,/z.) fl v-{'.__.., ?~ • • • January 8, 2015 The Honorable Randy Penn, Mayor Englewood City Council Members City of Englewood 1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, CO 80110 Dear Mayor Penn and City Council Members: I regret to inform you that I must resign as Commissioner from the Board of Commissioners of the Englewood Housing Authority due to a conflicting work schedule. My role as a Commissioner has been rewarding and productive. I am appreciative of the opportunity it allowed me to utilize my expertise for the benefit of the citizens of Englewood. My resignation is effective immediately. Beverly Bra sha~k/,,~ Ba RESOLUTION NO. • SERIES OF 2015 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING PAULA GRIMES FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO. WHEREAS, there is a vacancy in the Englewood Housing Authority; and WHEREAS, Paula Grimes has applied to serve as a member of the Englewood Housing Authority; and WHEREAS, Paula Grimes was previously named as an alternate to the Englewood Housing Authority; and WHEREAS, the Mayor desires to appoint Paula Grimes as a member of Englewood Housing Authority; and WHEREAS, the Englewood City Council supports the Mayor's appointment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Paula Grimes is hereby appointed to the Englewood Housing Authority for the City of Englewood, Colorado . Paula Grimes' term will be effective immediately and will expire • on July 1, 2015. • ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 20th day of January, 2015 . ATTEST: Randy P. Penn, Mayor Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk for the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify the above is a true copy of Resolution No. __ , Series of2015 . Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk Sb NAME -·"' ~; '--8e ·"'"' e ·t+-~i; (( MQ\)~~ City of Englewood DATE : January 20, 2015 ADDRESS <J 1 <-(o -s z'z J2 s~ De/ /Aw'v{.. :g::e r ""-ct ""'\ Community Media of Colorado State of Colorado County of Arapahoe AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION )ss This Affidavit of Publication for the Englewood Herald, a weekly newspaper, printed and published for the County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado, hereby certifies that i /·0 the attached legal notice was published in said newspaper once in each week, for.A'i:<~i; successive week(s), the last of which publication was made the 9th day of Jao ·*•'·""''~~-·""' A.O., 2015, and that copies of each number of said paper in which said Pu.o Notice was published were delivered by carriers or transmitteet :6~\1iq. . ii to ~~e h the subscribers of said paper, according to their accustomed mo this office. for the Englewood Herald , , ",;~.:~.-'; ~:~~t~1o~:::~~e ·~ )sS !~1'~, The above Affidavit and Certifi¢~ie .~f Publication was subscribed and sworn to before me by the above na fn:~ G:~·;ii~d li.e~ley, ,pu~lisher of said newspaper, who ,.,. • :" if.:-P cA-·:? ·· -.i.~ is personally known to me to Q~ tQ~·idenUca1 1"p~rson in the above certificate on this ·1:'}. 1;;. ... ·' 9th day of January A.O., 2015 ~'it(( My Commission Expires 10/12/16 Notary Public , PROOF OF PUBLICATION City of Englewood, Colorado Official Website www.englewoodgov.org I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk, for the City of Englewood, do solemnly swear that the attached legal notice (Notice of Public Hearing on January 20, 2015 on !Ott- Council Bill No . 1, authorizing amendments to Title 16: Unified Development Code regarding Bulk Plane Requirements) was published on the Official City of Englewood Website from January 7, 2015 through January 20, 2015 . State of Colorado ) ) SS County of Arapahoe ) Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 2Q 1h day of January, 2015. My Commission Expires: //-Dl'i Zl){ b ---------·-·------- S AL KERRY BUSH NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO , ~. NOTARYID19964018041 ~ _ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 8, 2016 . ----=~· _ _.,..__ Notary P blic CITY OF ENGLEWOOD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING January 20, 2015 Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado, has scheduled a Public Hearing at a Regular City Council Meeting on JANUARY 20, 2015, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of Englewood Civic Center, 1000 Englewood Parkway, to gather public input on Council Bill No. 1 a bill for an ordinance authorizing amendments to Title 16: Unified Development Code regarding Bulk Plane Requirements. Interested parties may express opinions in person at the Public Hearing or in writing to be received by the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m. on January 20, 2015. Anyone wishing to speak at the Public Hearing may call the City Clerk's Office, 303.762.2405 or 303.762.2407 to schedule their presentation or a sign-up sheet will be available at the door. By order of the Englewood City Council Loucrishia A. Ellis, MMC City Clerk, City of Englewood 1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, Colorado 80110 PUBLISHED: January 7, 2015 Official Website of the City of Englewood, Colorado • COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Date: Agenda Item: Subject: January 20, 2015 10 a Amendments to Title 16, Public Hearing on Council Bill 1: Bulk Plane Requirements Initiated By: Staff Source: Community Development Department Brook Bell, Planner II COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION Council considered the proposed Title 16 amendments at First Reading on January 5, 2015 and set a public hearing for January 20, 2015. RECOMMENDED ACTION Recommendation from the Community Development Department to consider testimony during Public Hearing on a Bill for an Ordinance authorizing amendments to Title 16: Unified Development Code regarding Bulk Plane Requirements . • BACKGROUND Prior to the adoption of the Unified Development Code (UDC) in 2004, residential building mass was regulated primarily by minimum setback, maximum height, and maximum lot coverage standards . With the adoption of the UDC, bulk plane requirements were added to further regulate residential building mass. The intent of the bulk plane regulations is "to ensure that new residential development, including additions and expansions of existing dwellings, provides adequate light and privacy to neighboring properties. In addition, the bulk plane requirements are intended to assure greater design compatibility in terms of building mass and scale within Englewood neighborhoods". The bulk plane creates an invisible tent-like boundary limiting the three dimensional space in which a dwelling structure, including the roof, may occupy (with some exceptions). The current bulk plane regulations apply to residential development of 4 units or less in the R-1-A, R-1-B, R-1-C, R-2-A, R-2-B, MU-R- 3-A, and MU-R-3-B zone districts. The bulk plane regulations do not apply to residential developments of 5 or more units, or non-residential development, or accessory structures in the zone districts listed above. The bulk plane regulations do not apply to any development in the MU-R-3-C, MU-B-1, MU-B-2, M-1, M-2, M-0- 2, 1-1, 1-2 or TSA zone districts. As residential development activity in the City of Englewood has increased, some architects, builders, and real estate professionals have stated that the UDC's bulk plane regulations are too restrictive and hinder new development. This is especially problematic for new duplexes and townhomes on 25 foot wide lots. It · should be noted that many cities have bulk plane regulations, including Denver, although their regulations • are less restrictive than Englewood's. The City of Littleton does not have any bulk plane regulations. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Recently, staff has had more detailed discussions with architects and builders regarding how the current bulk plane regulations affect the design, construction cost, and sale of new residential development and expansions of existing dwellings. The specific issues and proposed amendments to the current bulk plane regulations are listed below. • Beginning Point of Bulk Plane 12 Feet Above Midpoint of Side Property Line -The current bulk plane begins at a point 12 feet above the midpoint of the side property line and continues at a 45 degree angle toward the center of the property. This results in the bulk plane intersecting with the side wall of the house at an elevation of 17 feet for a house with a 5 foot setback. The market for most new homes demands 9 or 10 foot ceilings on the first floor, and 8 or 9 foot ceilings on the second floor. The current bulk plane does not accommodate these ceiling heights without recessing the first floor joists into the foundation wall and using a low sloping ceiling towards the side wall on the second floor. These construction techniques are not standard and increase costs for a builder. This issue becomes more critical for duplexes and triplexes on 25 foot wide lots where the side units are limited to 20 feet in overall width. The potential loss of functional space in these multi-unit developments has deterred some developers from building in Englewood. • Proposed Amendment to Beginning Point of Bulk Plane : Increase the beginning point of the bulk plane from 12 feet above the midpoint of the side property line, to a point 1 7 feet above the midpoint of the side property line; then continue at a 45 degree angle toward the center of the property. This results in the bulk plane intersecting with the side wall of the house at an elevation of 22 feet for a house with a 5 foot setback. This will allow for 9 or 10 foot ceilings on the first floor, and 8 or 9 foot ceilings on the • second floor without requiring special construction techniques. • Applicability of Bulk Plane in Different Zone Districts -Currently the bulk plane applies to residential development of 4 units or less in the R-1-A, R-1-B, R-1-C, R-2-A, R-2-B, MU-R-3-A, and MU-R-3-B zone districts. The R-1-A zone requires a minimum of 75 feet of lot width and minimum 7 foot side setbacks. The R-1-B zone requires a minimum 60 feet of lot width and minimum 5 foot side setbacks. The R-1-A and R-1-B zone districts are intended to be less dense with wider lots and in some cases wider side setbacks than the other residential zone districts. These wider lots with increased setbacks are not impacted by the current bulk plane regulations as much as the other residential zone districts. Proposed Amendment: Staff proposes to change the bulk plane only in the R-1-C, R-2-A, R-2-B, MU-R-3- A, and MU-R-3-B zone districts. No change is proposed in the R-1-A and R-1-B zone districts. The current UDC bulk plane that begins at a point 12 feet above the midpoint of the side property line is consistent with Denver's "suburban house" regulations . Neighborhoods in Denver such as Platt Park, Washington Park, and Observatory Park (which are similar in density to many of Englewood's neighborhoods) fall under the "urban house" zoning. Denver neighborhoods such as Wellshire, University Hills, and Southern Hills fall under the "suburban house" zoning. The character of the City of Englewood's R-1-A and R-1-B is more suburban and as such , staff recommends maintaining the current UDC bulk plane that begins at a point 12 feet above the midpoint of the side property line for the R-1-A and R-1-B zone districts. • Method of Measuring Grade -Currently the bulk plane is measured from the existing grade (or ground elevation) at the midpoint of each side property line. If the existing grade at the midpoint on one side • • property line is different than the other side property line, then the resulting bulk planes are asymmetrical when viewed from the front of the lot. When this occurs, most architects end up having to comply with the more restrictive of the two bulk planes to avoid having an elevation change in the floor of the house from side to side . Changing floor elevations adds construction costs and can compromise the internal layout of the home. Proposed Amendment to Method of Measuring Grade: Use the average existing grade of the midpoints of the side property lines to establish a base plane for both bulk planes . • Method of Measuring Maximum Side Wall Height -The maximum side wall height is currently measured at the point where the bottom of the soffit or eave intersects the side wall of the house. This approach penalizes certain roof framing profiles while rewarding others without regard to the intent of the bulk plane. Proposed Amendment to Method of Measuring Maximum Side Wall Height: Staff proposes to measure the side wall height at the point where the side wall of the house intersects the top roof framing member (roof sheathing). This approach is better aligned with the intent of the bulk plane and treats various roof framing profiles more equitably. A clarification for parapet walls (a short protective wall above a flat roof) will also be made that requires the top of the parapet wall to meet the bulk plane. Lastly, an exception for rooftop patio railings will be added so that a railing may extend into the bulk plane a maximum of 42 inches provided it is at least 75 % open or transparent. SUMMARY • The City of Englewood is experiencing increased demand and new interest in in-fill development. Staff has received feedback from architects, builders, and real estate professionals on the restrictive nature of the current bulk plane requirements in the UDC. Denver's less restrictive bulk plane regulations, and Littleton 's • lack of any bulk plane restrictions, may be steering some new development away from the City of Englewood . In order to create a competitive environment more conducive to redevelopment, the Planning and Zoning Commission provided a favorable recommendation of approval for the proposed UDC amendments which are detailed in the attached Bill for an Ordinance. FINANCIAL IMPACT Residential redevelopment will generate additional revenue incrementally from increased building and use taxes and through increased property taxes based on higher property valuations . LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Community Development Staff Report -October 21, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 21 , 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Findings of Fact -October 21, 2014 Bill for an Ordinance • • • c T y 0 F L E W 0 0 D COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Alan White, Community Development Director/ Chris Neubecker, Senior Plannerv FROM: Brook Bell, Planner II/ DATE : October 21 , 2014 SUBJECT: Case# 2014-05: Bulk Plane Amendments to the Unified Development Code RECOMMENDATION: Community Development Department requests that the Planning and Zoning Commission review, take public testimony, and forward to City Council a recommendation for adoption of Unified Developm ent Code (U DC) amendments regarding bulk plan e requirements. BACKGROUND: Prior to the UDC's adoption in 2004, resid entia l building mass was re gu lated primarily by minimum setback, maximum height, and maximum lot coverage standards . With the adoption of the UDC, bulk plane requirements were added to further regulate residential building mass. The intent of the bulk plane regulations is "to ens ure that new residential development, including additions and expansions of ex istin g dwellings, provides adequate li ght and privacy to neighboring properties. In addition, the bulk plane requir eme nts are intended to assure greater design compatibility in terms of building mass and scale within Englewood neighborhoods". The current bulk plane regulations are attached as Exhibit A The bulk plane creates an invisible tent-like boundary limiting the three dimensional space in which a dwelling structure, including the roof, may occupy (with some exceptions). Figure 16-6 {3) illustrates the bulk plane; note that the bulk plane increases in height as a structure 's side setback increases. The current bulk plane regulations apply to residential development of 4 units or less in the R-1-A, R-1-B, R-1-C , R-2-A, R-2-B, MU-R-3-A, and MU-R-3 -B zone districts. The bulk plane regulations do not apply to residential developments of 5 or more units, or non-residential development, or accessory structures in the zone districts listed above. The bulk plane regulations do not apply to any development in the MU-R-3-C, MU-B-1, MU-B-2, M-1 , M-2, M-0-2, 1-1, 1-2 or TSA zone districts . 1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood , Colorado 80110 PHONE 303-762-2342 FAX 303-783-6895 www.englewoodgov.org ANALYSIS: As residential development activity in the City of Englewood has increased, some architects, builders, and real estate professionals have stated that the UDC's bulk plane regulations are too restrictive and hinder new development. This is especially problematic for new duplexes and townhomes on 25 foot wide lots. It should be noted that many cities have bulk plane regulations, including Denver, although their regulations are less restrictive than Englewood 's. The City of Littleton does not have any bulk plane regulations . Recently, staff has had more detailed discussions with architects and builders regarding how the current bulk plane regulations affect the design, construction, and sale of new residential development and expansions of existing dwellings. The specific issues and proposed changes to the current bulk plane regulations are listed below. • Beginning Point of Bulk Plane 12 Feet Above Midpoint of Side Property Line -The current bulk plane begins at a point 12 feet above the midpoint of the side property line and continues at a 45 degree angle toward the center of the property. This results in the bulk plane intersecting with the side wall of the house at an elevation of 15 feet for a house with a 3 foot setback, and 1 7 feet for a house with a 5 foot setback. The market for most new homes demands 9 or 10 foot ceilings on the first floor, and 8 or 9 foot ceilings on the second floor. • The current bulk plane does not accommodate these ceiling heights without recessing the first floor joists into the foundation wall and using a low sloping ceiling towards the side wall on the second floor. Exhibits Band C show a new home that was recently • approved using these techniques to meet the current bulk plane (see red circles at foundation and second story ceiling on Exhibit C). These construction techniques are not standard and increase costs for a builder. This issue becomes more critical for duplexes and triplexes on 25 foot wide lots where the side units are limited to 20 feet in overall width. The potential loss of functional space in these multi-unit developments has deterred some developers from building in Englewood. Proposed Change to Beginning Point of Bulk Plane: Increase the beginning point of the bulk plane from 12 feet above the midpoint of the side property line, to a point 17 feet above the midpoint of the side property line; then continue at a 45 degree angle toward the center of the property. This results in the bulk plane intersecting with the side wall of the house at an elevation of 20 feet for a house with a 3 foot setback, and 22 feet for a house with a 5 foot setback. This will allow for 9 or 10 foot ceilings on the first floor, and 8 or 9 foot ceilings on the second floor without requiring special construction techniques. Exhibit D shows the same house as previous exhibits, but with standard construction techniques and 9 foot ceilings on both the first and second floors (see green circles at foundation and second story ceiling on Exhibit 0). Note that the house just meets the bulk plane utilizing a 17 foot high beginning point for the bulk plane (see green line for proposed bulk plane). The roof pitch on this house would have to be modified to meet • the current 32 foot maximum height in the UDC. There are no proposed changes to the • current 32 foot maximum height in the UDC. • • • Applicability of Bulk Plane in Different Zone Districts -Currently the bulk plane applies to residential development of 4 units or less in the R-1-A, R-1-B, R-1-C, R-2-A, R-2-B, MU- R-3-A, and MU-R-3-B zone districts. The R-1-A zone requires a minimum of 7S feet of lot width and minimum 7 foot side setbacks; or for a "Small Lot", SO feet of lot width and minimum S foot side setbacks. The R-1-B zone requires a minimum 60 feet of lot width and minimum S foot side setbacks; or for a "Small Lot", SO feet of lot width and minimum S foot side setbacks. • The R-1-A and R-1-B are intended to be less dense with wider lots and in some cases wider side setbacks than the other residential zone districts. Wider lots with increased setbacks are not impacted by the current bulk plane regulations as much as the other residential zone districts. Proposed Change: Staff proposes to change the bulk plane only in the R-1-C, R-2-A, R-2- B, MU-R-3-A, and MU-R-3-B zone districts. No change is proposed in the R-1-A and R-1- B zone districts. The current UDC bulk plane begins at a point 12 feet above the midpoint of the side property line, which is consistent with Denver's "suburban house" regulations. Neighborhoods in Denver such as Platt Park, Washington Park, and Observatory Park (which are similar in density to many of Englewood's neighborhoods) fall under the "urban house" zoning. Denver neighborhoods such as Wellshire, University Hills, and Southern Hills fall under the "suburban house" zoning. The character of the City of Englewood's R-1-A and R-1-B is more suburban and as such, staff recommends maintaining the current UDC bulk plane that begins at a point 12 feet above the midpoint of the side property line for the R-1-A and R-1-B zone districts . Method of Measuring Grade -Currently the bulk plane is measured from the existing grade (or elevation) at the midpoint of each side property line. If the existing grade at the midpoint on one side property line is different than the other side property line, then the resulting bulk planes are asymmetrical when viewed from the front of the lot. When this occurs, most architects end up having to comply with the more restrictive of the two bulk planes to avoid having an elevation change in the floor of the house from side to side. Proposed Change to Method of Measuring Grade: Use the average existing grade of the midpoints of the side property lines to establish a base plane for both bulk planes. Denver uses this approach although Denver's code establishes the base plane where the front setback line meets each side property line. Staff does not recommend using the front setback line as the point of measurement as this can have negative impact on lots with significant grade changes from front to rear. • Method of Measuring Maximum Side Wall Height -The maximum side wall height is currently measured at the point where the bottom of the soffit or eave intersects the side wall of the house. This approach penalizes certain roof framing profiles while rewarding others without regard to the intent of the bulk plane. The red line on Exhibit E illustrates how the maximum side wall height is currently measured. Proposed Change to Method of Measuring Maximum Side Wall Height: Staff propos es to measure the side wall height at the point where the side wall of the hou se intersects the roof framing member (roof sheathing to be exact). The green line on Ex hibit E illustrates this recommended change. This approach is better aligned with the intent of the bulk plane and treats various roof framing profiles more e quitably. A clarification for parapet walls will also be made that requires the top of the parapet wall to meet the bulk plane . Lastly, an exception for rooftop patio railings will be added so that a railing may extend into the bulk plane a maximum of 42 inches provided it is at least 75 % open or transparent. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: To implement the proposed changes to the current bulk plane regulations, staff recommends the following amendments to the UDC. • UDC Section 16-6-1 :G.2.a . Applicability Clarify that bulk plane regulations shall only apply to residential development of 4 units or less in the R-1-A, R-1-B , R-1-C, R-2-A , R-2- B, MU-R-3-A, and MU-R-3-B zone districts. • • UDC Section 16-6-1 :G .2 .b. Exceptions Clarify that the bulk plane regulations do not apply to residential developments of 5 or more units, or non-residential development, or accessory structures in the in the R-1-A , R-1-B , R-1 -C, R-2-A, R-2-B , MU-R-3-A, and MU-R-• 3-B zone districts; and that the bulk plane regulations do not apply to any development in the MU-R-3-C, MU-B-1, MU-B-2 , M -1, M-2, M-0-2, 1-1, 1-2 or TSA zone districts . Add an exception for rooftop patio railings so that a railing may extend into the bulk plane a maximum of 42 inches provided it is at least 75 % open or transparent. • UDC Section 16-6-1 :G.3. Bulk Plane Requirements Amend the beginning point of the bulk plane from 12 feet above the midpoints of the side property lines, to a point 1 7 feet above the midpoints of the side property lines in the R-1-C, R-2-A, R-2-B, MU-R-3-A, and MU-R-3-B zone districts. Clarify that the beginning point of the bulk plane shall remain at 12 feet above the midpoints of the side property lines in the R-1-A and R-1-B zone districts . Clarify that the average existing grade of the midpoints of the side property lines shall establish a base plane for both bulk planes. Clarify that the maximum side wall height shall be at the point where the side wall of the structure intersects the highest roof framing member. Add a provision that requires the top of an y parapet wall to meet the bulk plane. • UDC Figure 16-6(3): Bulk Plane Revise the figure and commentary to show the beginning point of the bulk plane at 1 7 feet above the midpoint of the side property for the R-1-C, R-2-A, R-2-B , MU-R-3-A, and MU-R-3-B zone districts and 12 feet above the midpoint of the side property for the R-1-A and R-1-B zone districts . • • UDC As necessary, edit any other prov1s1ons of the UDC related to bulk plane • regulations to implement the intent of these amendments. • • SUMMARY: The City of Englewood is experiencing increased demand and new interest in in-fill d ev elopment. Staff has received feedback from architects, builders, and real estate professionals on the restrictive nature of the current bulk plane requirements in the UDC. Denver's less restrictive bulk plane regulations, and Littleton's lack of any bulk plane restrictions, may be steering some new development away from the City of Englewood. Based on more detailed discussions with architects and builders, these amendments to the current bulk plane regulations are proposed for the Planning and Zoning Commission's consideration. SUGGESTED MOTION: That Case # 2014-05: Bulk Plane Amendments to the Unified Development Code be forwarded to City Council with a favorable recommendation for adoption incorporating the amendments proposed in this staff report. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -E • • El CllY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CllY COUNCIL CHAMBERS OCTOBER 21, 2014 I. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Englewood Civic Center, Vice Chair King presiding. Present: Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth (arrived 7:03), Roth, Townley, Madrid (arrived 7:06) Absent:Fish (Excused), Bleile (Excused) Staff: El Alan White, Director, Community Development Chris Neubecker, Senior Planner Brook Bell, Planner II Dugan Comer, City Attorney's Office II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • October 7, 2014 Brick moved; Roth seconded: TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 7, 2014, MINUTES Vice Chair King asked if there were any modifications or corrections. There were none. AYES: NAYS: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Motion carried. e Brick, King, Kinton, Roth, Townley None Freemire Fish, Bleile, Knoth (arrived 7:03) Ill. FINDINGS OF FACT CASE #2012-07 PUD PROCESS AMENDMENTS Roth moved; Freemire seconded: TO APPROVE FINDINGS OF FACT FOR CASE #2012-07 PUD PROCESS AMENDMENTS AYES: NAYS: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: e Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Roth, Townley None None Fish, Bleile, Knoth (arrived 7:03) Ill. PUBLIC HEARING CASE #2014-05 BULK PLANE REGULATION AMENDMENTS • Townley moved; Page 1 of 7 Freemire seconded: To open the Public Hearing for Case #2014-05 Bulk Plane Regulation Amendments AYES: NAYS: Brick, Freemire, King , Kinton , Knoth , Roth, Townley None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT : Fish , Bleile Motion passes. e Staff Presentation Brook Bell, Planner II with the Community Development Department, was sworn in . Mr. Bell reviewed the proposed amendments that were previously discussed in the study session September 16, 2014. Prior to the adoption of the Unified Development Code in 2004, building mass was constrained by setbacks, height and lot coverage. With the adoption of the UDC, bulk plane requirements were added at that time. The bulk plane is a three dimensional "tent" that contains a structure. The current regulations apply to residential structures with four (4) or fewer units in the R- 1-A, R-1-B, R-1-C, R-2-A, R-2-B, MU-R-3-A, and MU-R-3-B zone districts. EJ Over the last few years, feedback from architects, builders and developers has been that the bulk plane is too restrictive to permit reasonable redevelopment with standard construction techniques. The proposed amendments seek to resolve issues related to the bulk plane: El 1 ) Beginning point of Bulk Plane 12 Feet Above Midpoint of Side Property Line a . Staff proposes that the bulk plane begin at a point 17 feet above the midpoint of the side property line and continue at a 45 degree angle toward the center of the property. 2) Applicability of Bulk Plane in Different Zone Districts 3) 4) a. The character of the City of Englewood's R-1-A and R-1-B is more suburban and as such, staff recommends maintaining the current UDC bulk plane that begins at a point 12 feet abov e the midpoint of the side property line for these zone d istricts . The increased height of the bulk plane would apply to zones R-1-C, R-2-A, R-2-B , MU-R-3-A, and MU-R-3-B. Method of Measuring the Grade a . The average height of the existing grade measured at the mid-point of the side lot lines would be used to establish the base plane from which the side wall height would be measured. Method of Measuring Maximum Side Wall Height a . Staff proposes to measure the side wall height at the point where the side wall of the house intersects the roof framing member (roof sheathing). Staff recommends that the Commission forward the proposed amendments to City Council for a"ioval. Mr. Brick asked if the citizens of Englewood received enough notice to be aware of the proposed UDC amendment. Mr. Bell responded that the appropriate postings were made and to his knowledge there were no additional press releases or other notifications of the hearing. -e Page 2 of 7 • • • • • • Mr. Knoth inquired about odd size lots in R-1-A and R-1-B, specifically narrow lots and whether or not there would be accommodation for those lots since the amendment would not affect those zone districts. Mr. Bell replied that the option of pursuing a variance remains for lots with unusual dimensions. Mr. Knoth asked if that variance would be administrative and Mr. Bell responded that the matter of a variance would go before the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. e Mr. Freemire asked what the difference in home values would be for a single family home in Englewood should a house be removed and replaced with a new home. Mr. Bell responded that his sense is that the new homes are much larger than the existing homes and would be considerably more expensive. The market for duplexes and triplexes is very strong. El Mr. Bell pointed out that there is not a blackline version of the code provided but that per the Commission's request, the proposed changes are outlined in the staff memo with details of staff's recommendations of how to address each item. El Public Comment Eric Bennett, 2 7 40 South Delaware Street, was sworn in. Mr. Bennett currently owns a property with an 800 square foot home adjacent to a tri-plex that was built prior to the adoption of the UDC. He would like to redevelop his property with a duplex unit that would sell for approximately $450,000-475,000 per unit. This redevelopment would represent an increase in taxes to the City of Eillewood as well as increased property value for the community. Bill McVey, 2059 Eudora Street, Denver, was sworn in. Mr. McVey is a real estate developer. He recently purchased a home at 2835 South Sherman with the intention of scraping the house and building a duplex. He believes the units will sell for $550,000-575,000 each. The bulk plane affected his development because of the sloping nature of the lot and hampered his ability to build the duplex as it was designed. He supports the proposed code amendment and feels that he will continue to redevelop properties in Englewood if the less restrictive bulk plane regulations are adopted. El Freemire moved; Knoth seconded: TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CASE #2014-05 BULK PLANE REGULATION AMENDMENTS AYES: NAYS: Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth, Townley None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Fish, Bleile Motion passes. El Brick moved; Freemire seconded: e Discussion TO APPROVE CASE #2014-05 BULK PLANE REGULATION AMENDMENTS AS WRITTEN AND FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION Page 3 of 7 Mr. Roth explained that the purpose of the bulk plane regulation in the UDC is to control the scale of new development and reduce the effects of shading on the neighboring properties. Englewood • was originally developed as a suburban community. Areas of Englewood are evolving into neighborhoods with more urban character. He supports the idea but has reservations about including R-1-C. He feels that by adopting liberal development standards there will be an issue when residents become aware of the change in building sizes. His desire is to see the amended regulation applied to R-2 and the more dense areas and not reach so deeply into the nehborhoods. Mr. Brick asked where the majority of R-1-C properties are in the City and how many homes fall under the R-1-C designation. Mr. Roth responded that the majority of the homes in the City are in R-1-C and described the boundaries. E1 Discussion about when the Comprehensive Plan will be enacted. [Secretary's Note: The Comprehensive Plan is scheduled to be completed in August/September 2015, with adoption following. Adoption of other plans and code changes to implement the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan may take longer.] El Mr. Freemire estimated that the R-1-C is 60% of the City. He has personally seen property values increase in his neighborhood. His home is larger than those in the surrounding area and has not had an adverse effect on adjacent homes. Mr. Freemire expressed that he feels the current code amendment proposal is prudent based on market conditions. Mr. Roth expressed concern that the proposed code amendment will create additional non- conforming structures in the City . R!moved; • Brick seconded: TO APPROVE CASE #2014-05 BULK PLANE REGULATION AMENDMENTS WITH THE EXCLUSION OF THE R-1-C ZONE DISTRICT. Discussion El i --= Mr. Freemire commented that in his past experience where the decision was made to be market- based by creating an environment that was friendly to business and development, tax revenues increased incrementally and improvements were made to existing neighborhoods while fixed costs o0roviding services remained relatively stable. Mr. Brick commented that with the process of developing the revised Comprehensive Plan, the City will have an opportunity to hear from a larger segment of the population. If the revision is not made now, it will take longer to address R-1-C. He feels that if the case is presented before the citizens there will be understanding of the benefits to R-1-C and to the City. El Mr. King discussed the difference in redevelopment activity in Denver north of Yale and the amount of redevelopment that is taking place across Englewood's border. Denver revised their regulations and development activity increased. Building cycles are relatively short-lived and this is an olortunity to take advantage of the market. VOTE ON AMENDMENT TO THE ORIGINAL MOTION TO EXCLUDE R-1-C FROM THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE UDC: Page 4 of 7 • • • • AYES: NAYS: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: El Brick, Roth Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Townley None Fish, Bleile Brick -Yes, he agrees with the proposed amendment to the bulk plane but also believes that three years isn't too long to wait to make changes. He would like to see more of the community involved in the decision, specifically in the R-1-C. With the (coincidental) public engagement activities related to the Comprehensive Plan, there will be opportunity for the public to learn about the change. E1 Freemire -No, the issue of the bulk plane will not necessarily be on the agenda for the Comprehensive Plan. King -No Kinton -No, although more public participation would be ideal, it will most likely not happen. Knoth -No Roth -Yes Townley -No Motion failed. E Vote on original motion: AYES: NAYS: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: E1 TO APPROVE CASE #2014-05 BULK PLANE REGULATION AMENDMENTS AS WRITIEN AND FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth, Townley None None Fish, Bleile Mr. Brick -Yes, cited Section 5 and Objective 2.1 under housing in Section 5 of the Comprehensive Plan regarding housing. This amendment is in alignment with the Comprehensive Plan. Freemire -Yes, this is a way to improve the tax base and the future appearance of Englewood, to allow the market to prevail and not have a government that stands in the way thereof. El King -Yes, it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will bring in a mix of different kinds of housing with appropriate amenities for families. e Kinton -Yes, for the reasons previously stated and this change will promote and spur development. D Knoth -Yes, market forces should drive these decisions and right now the market has stopped at Yale and he would like to see it cross over into Englewood. El Page 5 of 7 Roth -Yes, it is something that is needed in the higher density areas although there are still cDcerns about R-1-C but all in all it is a positive change. • Townley -Yes, this amendment supports all three R's of the 2003 Comprehensive Plan Redevelopment, Revitalization and Reinvention. Motion passes. El IV. PUBLIC FORUM There were no comments by the public. V. AITORNEY'S CHOICE e Attorney did not have any comments. VI. STAFF'S CHOICE Director White -The Commissioners are scheduled for an informal meeting with the consultants for the Comprehensive Plan next Monday night, October 27th at 7:30 p.m. at Englewood Civic Center in a conference room on the 3'd floor. There will be several more opportunities to participate in the future, such as the public meeting to be held November 12th. Mr. Brick asked if it would be possible to come early to listen to other sessions; Director White stated that because 3 or more members from a board or commission will be present, the meetings are considered public. El Ms. Townley asked what kind of information the consultants are hoping to obtain from the Commissioners. Director White responded that the sessions are fairly informal and there is no preparation necessary on the part of the Commissioners. Mr. Kinton asked if the three plans are separate or will they be conducted concurrently. Director White explained that staff and Consultants are attempting to combine the three into one via the website EnglewoodForward .org since the plans are interrelated. The website will provide an opportunity for the public to express their thoughts and opinions on a variety of topics related to each project. The three projects are the Comprehensive Plan, Light Rail Next Steps Study and the Kaiser Walk and Wheel study. The gstions from the consultants will cover all three topics. Mr. Bell supplied a handout with the UDC chart of uses for MU-R-3-C. He explained that in 2012, staff was considering a "phase 2" rezoning in the Medical District area encompassing an area between Girard Avenue and Floyd Avenue. Staff has discovered a conflict in the code regarding minimum lot width in the hospital district zoning and the MU-R-3-C zoning code. When the code was adopted by City Council, the text was changed slightly and was codified. A public hearing has been scheduled for November 4th to address the issue. E1 Mr. Knoth asked if the same amendment should be made for the MU-R-3-B zone district because the same apparent conflict exists in the Code. Staff will research the subject further and present information to the Commission either at the Public Hearing November 4th or in a study session if necessary. Page 6 of 7 • • • • • VII. COMMISSIONER'S CHOICE El Freemire -Appreciates opposing viewpoints and that the end result is agreement among the Commissioners. El Townley -Thanked the Commissioners for their input for her Leadership Practices Inventory; she has received a report with information on what she is doing correctly and areas she needs to iijrove. Brick -The RiNo (River North Arts District) field trip was inspiring and the Comprehensive Plan will provide opportunity to build something similar in Englewood. He thanked Staff for arranging the to King -Thanked the Commissioners for their cooperation even when there are differing opinions. The meeting adjourned at 8 :18 p .m . ,_,I seJ.../_,l-=u.:..:.:I i e=-=B-=a.:..:.:i I e::..iy'--__,. Recording Secretary Page 7 of 7 • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF CASE #2014-05 AMENDMENTS TO BULK PLANE REGULATIONS FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RELATING TO THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE INITIATED BY: Community Development Department 1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, CO 80110 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Commission Members Present: Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton, Knoth, Roth, Townley Commission Members Absent: Bleile, Fish This matter was heard before the City Planning and Zoning Commission on October 21, 2014, in the City Council Chambers of the Englewood Civic Center . Testimony was received from staff. The Commission received notice of Public Hearing, the Staff Report, and a copy of the proposed amendments to Title 16 Unified Development Code which were incorporated into and made a part of the record of the Public Hearing. After considering the statements of the witness and reviewing the pertin ent documents , the members of the City Planning and Zoning Commission made the following Findings and Conclusions. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THAT the Public Hearing on the Unifi ed Development Code (UDC) Title 16 Chapter 6-6-1 Bulk Plane Requirements , was brought before the Planning Commission by the Department of Community Development, a department of the City of Englewood. 2. THAT notice of the Public Hearing was published in the Englewood H e rald on October 10, 2014 , and notice of the Public Hearing was on the City of Englewood website from October 10, 2014 to October 21 , 2014. 3 . THAT the Staff report was made part of the record . 4. THAT The City of Englewood is experiencing increased demand and interest in redevelopment of older residential properties . 5 . THAT the revision to the UDC would increase the height of the bulk plane. 6. THAT two members of the general public testified during the October 21, 2014, public hearing in favor of the proposed code amendments, and indicated that the proposed code amendments would allow greater flexibility for building in Englewood. 7. THAT the revision to the UDC is necessary to meet market demand for taller ceilings inside new homes. 8. THAT the revision to the UDC will allow a greater variety of housing to be constructed in the City of Englewood. 9 . THAT some of the recent new construction projects in the City have required the use of special construction techniques that limit ceiling height on the second floor and cost more to build. 10 . THAT some neighboring communities have changed their bulk plane regulations and have seen an increase in new residential construction. CONCLUSIONS 1. THAT the proposed amendment to the UDC will encourage building and redevelopment of new homes in the city. 2. THAT redevelopment activity should result in increased tax collections. 3. THAT the proposed code changes will facilitate development by allowing greater flexibility in design. 4. THAT the proposed code amendments will allow the demands of the private real estate market to prevail. 5. THAT the proposed changes are in conformance with Roadmap Englewood: 2003 Englewood Comprehensive Plan by supporting Redevelopment, Revitalization and Reinvention. • • • • • • DECISION THEREFORE, it is the decision of the City Planning and Zoning Commission that Case #2014-05 Bulk Plane Requirements amendm e nts should be referred to the Ci t y Council with a favorable recommendation . The decision was reached upon a vote on a motion made at the meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission on October 21, 2014, by Brick, seconded by Freemir e, which motion states: AYES: NAYS: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: CASE #2074-05 AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 76: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE RELATED TO BULK PLANE REQUIREMENTS AS WRITTEN BE FORWARDED FOR APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDA T/ON. Brick, Freemire, King, Kinton , Knoth , Roth , Townley None None Bleile, Fish Motion carried . These Findings and Conclusions are effective as of the meeting on October 21 , 2014. R OF THE CITY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION hair • • • ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 2015 BY AUTHORITY COUNCIL BILL NO. 1 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ------- A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 16, CHAPTER 6, SECTION 1, SUBSECTION G, OF THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE 2000 PERTAINING TO BULK PLANE REQUIREMENTS. WHEREAS, the intent of the bulk plane regulations is to ensure that new residential development, including additions and expansions of existing dwellings, provides adequate light and privacy to neighboring properties. In addition, the bulk plane requirements are intended to assure greater design compatibility in terms of building mass and scale within Englewood neighborhoods ; and WHEREAS, the bulk plane creates an invisible tent-like boundary limiting the three dimensional space which a dwelling structure, including the roof, may occupy (with some exceptions); and WHEREAS, as residential development activity in the City of Englewood has increased, some architects, builders, and real estate professionals have stated that the UDC's bulk plane regulations are too restrictive and hinder new development. This is especially problematic for new duplexes and town homes on twenty-five foot wide lots; and WHEREAS, the current bulk plane begins at a point twelve feet above the midpoint of the side property line and continues at a forty-five degree angle toward the center of the property. This results in the bulk plane intersecting with the side wall of the house at an elevation of seventeen feet for a house with a five foot setback. The market for most new homes demands nine or ten foot ceilings on the first floor, and eight or nine foot ceilings on the second floor; and WHEREAS, this proposed change to the beginning point of bulk plane increases the beginning point of the bulk plane from twelve feet above the midpoint of the side property line to seventeen feet; then continues at a forty-five degree angle toward the center of the property. This results in the bulk plane intersecting with the side wall of the house at an elevation of twenty-two feet for a house with a five foot setback. This will allow for nine or ten foot ceilings on the first floor, and eight or nine foot ceilings on the second floor without requiring special construction techniques; and WHEREAS, this ordinance changes the bulk plane only in the R-1-C, R-2-A, R-2-B, MU-R-3-A, and MU-R-3-B zone districts; and WHEREAS, the bulk plane height will remain at twelve feet in R-1-A and R-1-B zone districts, because those districts have wider lots and set backs to meet the current bulk plane request; and 1 WHEREAS, the bulk place is currently measured from the existing grade (or ground elevation) at the midpoint of each side property line; and WHEREAS, the proposed change to this method of measuring grade uses the average existing grade of the midpoints of the side property lines in all zone districts; and WHEREAS, the maximum side wall height is currently measured at the point where the bottom of the soffit or eave intersects the side wall of the house in all zone districts; and WHEREAS, the proposed change to the method of measuring maximum side wall height will measure the side wall height at the point where the side wall of the house intersects the top roof framing member in all zone districts; and WHEREAS, the Englewood Planning and Zoning Commission recommended these changes to allow more flexibility for a mix of housing with a minimal impact on adjacent properties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes amending Title 16, Chapter 6, Section 1, Subsection G, entitled Bulk Plane Requirements, of the Englewood Municipal Code 2000, to read as follows: 16-6-1: Dimensional Requirements. EDITORS NOTE: Title 16-6-1 (A) through (F), contain no changes and are therefore not included here. G. Bulk Plane Requirements. 1 . Intent. The bulk plane requirements in this subsection are intended to ensure that new residential development, including additions and expansions of existing dwellings, provides adequate light and privacy to neighboring properties. In addition, the bulk plane requirements are intended to assure greater design compatibility in terms of building mass and scale within Englewood neighborhoods. 2. Applicability and Exceptions. a. Applicability. Except as exempt by this subsection, the bulk plane requirements in this subsection shall apply to: 2 • • • • • • ( 1) All new residential development of four ( 4) dwelling units or less in the R-1-A. R-1-B. R-1-C. R-2-A. R-2-B. MU-R-3-A. and MU-R-3-B zone districts: subject to the Residential Design Standards and G1::1idelines in Section Hi €i 10 .R EMC; (2) All new residential development on legal, nonconforming lots that have lot widths less than the minimum required by the applicable zone district; and (3) All new residential development on small lots and urban lots. b . Exceptions. (1) The bulk plane requirements in this subsection shall not apply to new residential developments of five (5) or more units. or non-residential development. or accessory structures in the R-1-A. R-1-B. R-1-C. R-2-A. R-2-B. MU-R-3-A. and MU-R-3-B zone districts. in the MU B 1, MU B 2, M 1, M 2 , M 0 2, or TSA districts . The e\:llk fllane reqHirements in this sooseotion shall not af>fll)' to stracrures or f)Ortions of stracrures euffif)t from the InaXiffillffi height limits, as SfleCified in sooseotion 1 €i €i 1.E.1 EMC . The bulk plane requirements in this subsection shall not apply to any development in the MU-R-3-C. MU-B-1. MU-B-2. M-1. M-2. M-0-2. I-1. I-2 or TSA zone districts . (2) Dormers with window(s) may partially protrude through the bulk plane defined below for a maximum cumulative length of fifteen ( 15) linear feet, measured horizontally at the point of intersection with the bulk plane, and provided the vertical height of a dormer window does not extend above the height of the ridgeline of the roof surface from which the dormer protrudes . (3) Eaves may extend up to twenty-four inches (24") into the bulk plane, provided it does not project further into a side setback than the maximum projection allowed by 16-6-l :FS(b)(l). The extension shall be measured horizontally from the building wall to the furthest extent of the eave. ( 4) Gutters may extend into the bulk plane, regardless of whether the eave projects into the bulk plane. ill Chimneys may extend vertically into the bulk plane a maximum of ten feet ilQ'.1 3 (fil Patio or deck railings may extend vertically into the bulk plane a maximum of forty-two inches ( 42") if the railing is at least seventy-five percent (75%) open or transparent. 3. Bulk Plane Requirements. Except as specifically excepted in subsection G~f2l, above, no part of any structure subject to these bulk plane requirements (including air conditioner, elevator penthouses, and other mechanical equipment) shall project through the following defined bulk planes, which define a building envelope for the subject lot: a._ For all applicable zone districts. the base plane for the vertical measurement of the bulk plane shall be established by taking the average of the existing grades of the midpoints of the two side property lines. b. The maximum side wall height shall be measured at the point where the side wall of the structure intersects the highest roof framing member (typically roof sheathing). The top of any parapet wall shall not extend beyond the defined bulk plane. a. R-1-A and R-1-B Zone Districts. ill A horizontal line that is located directly above the side lot line and which passes through a point twelve feet (12') above the midpoint of such siae lot liae base plane described in paragraph (a), above; and The intersecting lines that extend over the lot at a pitch of 12 : 12 ( 45-degree angle) from the horizontal lines defined in paragraph W ~above. d. R-1-C. R-2-A. R-2-B. MU-R-3-A . AND MU-R-3-B Zone Districts. ill A horizontal line that is located directly above the side lot line and which passes through a point seventeen feet (17') above the base plane described in paragraph (a) above: and ill The intersecting lines that extend over the lot at a pitch of 12 : 12 ( 45- degree angle) from the horizontal lines defined in (d)(l) above. 4 • • • • • • ! !15• l l12' ! ! I ! I l Figure 16-6(3): Bulk Plane property line 5 1 l t l ! . ' l1 1111 l . lH it 1 1t I l lit '! l f t i 1 d I 11 J t 11 ! I J 1 I I H l t . l I It I I. i l , i 11 l 1· I . 1 I I f Ii I! l , . 1 l i 1l !q)l . j l~ j 1' l tj j 11 f i ' I r . I l ~ • 1 l I ll 111 d,, . '1 i d . ! j • l I • I I ' 1 1. 1 1 I · 1 ' J 1!11i I". I Ii I f I I I I i ' ! ' I ' i 1i1 p . ,• ·1 I ! 1 . !if 11 .!l 11 1·ii ij I l ! ! l ! . l . i I Figure 16-6(3): Bulk Plane Maximum Height ···.\- Property Line D I c E Base Plane 8 Beginning point of Bulk Plane shall be : • 12 ' above Base Plane for R-1-A and R-1-B Districts . • 17' above Base Plane for R-1-C . R-2-A. R-2-B MU-R-3-A and MU-R-3-B zone districts . ~ Side setback varies by zone district and lot type. see table 16-6-1 .1 EMC . ,Q Maximum Side wall height (A+B=C). where side wall of structure intersects the highest roof framing member. Q Maximum height of structure. see Table 16-6-1.1 EMC. ~ Base Plane. average existing made of the two side property line midpoints. Commentary to Figu.re 16-6(3) Bulk Plane [above}: The shaded portion of the illustration above depicts the defined bulk plane, which must contain the entire dwelling structure (with limited exceptions for projecting dormers., f:H'td chimneys. and railings). The bulk plane is measured at a forty-five degree (45°) angle from a horizontal line located directly above each side lot line and which passes through a point twelve feet (12? above the base plane in the R-1-A and R-1-B zone districts. or seventeen (eet 07') above the base plane in the R-1-C. R-2-A. R-2-B, MU-R-3- 6 • • • • • • A and MU-R-3 B zone districts. miripeint efslieh side let line. Thefifteenfeet (15) vertical height shewn in the ilhistratie1i indicates thepei1it ,,.,here the h!ilkplane iii this example inelines teward the center &j the Jet , aceelinting fer a three feet (3) side sethaek reqliired in se;,ieHJ:l E>f tl1:0 residential zene dist1 ·iets. Th e max imum side wall height is the point where the side wall of the structure intersects the highest roo((raming member. Section 2 . Safety Clauses. The City Council hereby finds, detennines, and declares that this Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Englewood, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public, and that this Ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be obtained. Section 3. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect , impair or invalidate the remainder of this Ordinance or it application to other persons or circumstances. Section 4. Inconsistent Ordinances . All other Ordinances or portions thereof inconsistent or conflicting with this Ordinance or any portion hereof are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency or conflict. Section 5. Effect of repeal or modification. The repeal or modification of any provision of the Code of the City of Englewood by this Ordinance shall not release, extinguish, alter, modify, or change in whole or in part any penalty, forfeiture, or liability, either civil or criminal, which shall have been incurred under such provision, and each provision shall be treated and held as still remaining in force for the purposes of sustaining any and all proper actions , suits, proceedings, and prosecutions for the enforcement of the penalty, forfeiture, or liability, as well as for the purpose of sustaining any judgment, decree, or order which can or may be rendered, entered, or made in such actions, suits, proceedings , or prosecutions. Section 6. Penalty . The Penalty Provision of Section 1-4-1 EMC shall apply to each and every violation of this Ordinance. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 5th day of January, 2015 . Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City 's official newspaper on the 9th day of January, 2015 . 7 Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City's official website beginning on the 7th day of January, 2015 for thirty (30) days . Randy P . Penn, Mayor ATTEST: Loucrishia A. Ellis , City Clerk I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 5th day of January, 2015. Loucrishia A. Ellis 8 • • • • COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Date: Agenda Item: Subject: January 20, 2015 11 a i IGA Amendment fo r Art Shuttle Cost Sharing Initiated By: Staff Source: Community Development Department Harold J. Stitt, Senior Planner PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION Council approved an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the City and the Regional Transportation District (RTD) for funding of the Englewood Circulator Shuttle by Ordinance 50, Series of 2004, by Ordinance 66, Series of 2007, by Ordinance 10, Series of 2008, by Ordinance 8, Series of 2009, by Ordinance 4, Series of 2010, Ordinance 5, Series of 2011 , by Ordinance 9, Series of 2012 , by Ordinance 3, Series of 2013 , and by Ordinance 10, Series of 2014. Council approved by Motion, in August 2004, a contract for transit services with Laidlaw Transit Services and subsequently extended this contract by Resolution No. 87, Series of 2005, by Resolution No. 77, Series of 2006, by Motion on December 3, 2007, by Motion on March 3, 2008, by Motion on April 6, 2009. Council approved by Motion on December 21, 2009, a contract for transit services with MV Transportation, Inc., and subsequently extended this contract by Motion on February 22, 2011 , by Motion on March 5, 2012 , by Motion on • February 4, 2013, and by Motion on March 1 7, 2014. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends Council adopt a Bill for an Ordinance authorizing the First Amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Englewood and the Regional Transportation District (RTD) for cost sharing for operation of the art shuttle for 2015 . BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS In 2014, RTD added a provision to their standard Intergovernmental Agreement that provides for either party to amend the agreement (Paragraph 1 OH). For 2015, this allows for a simple amendment to the IGA stipulating the new funding amounts since all other provisions of the IGA will not change . Under this amendment, the shuttle will continue to provide the current level of service operating every 15 minutes, Monday through Friday, 6 :30 AM to 6 :30 PM. RTD will reimburse the City 100% of all net operating costs as set forth in Exhibit B of the IGA less estimated farebox revenue. Net operating expenses exclude administrative costs, marketing and promotional materials cost. The total budget for 201 5 shuttle operations as proposed by RTD is $313,326 composed of operating expenses of $264,806 and estimated fuel costs of $48,520. For comparison, the 2014 operating expenses were $268,729 with estimated fuel costs of $48,520. Actual fuels cost for 2014 were $41 , 981. As with prior agreements, the City will also provide fuel to eliminate state and federal gasoline taxes, reducing fuel costs . The City will reimburse RTD an amount equal to the farebox revenue that would have been collected had the shuttle operated as a fare • service rather that free service . The amount of the compensation was determined through a survey of riders conducted in October 2014. The survey results indicated the number of riders that did not have a bus pass or transfer and would be subject to the standard, reduced senior or student fare. For calendar • year 2015, the estimated farebox revenue amount is $79,531. FINANCIAL IMPACT RTD will reimburse the City for all contract and fuel costs less the farebox revenue fare amount. For the contract period the estimated farebox revenue amount is $79,531 and is included in the approved 2015 Community Development Department budget. The contract continues the same level of service operating Monday through Friday, 6:30 am to 6:30 pm at no cost to riders . ATTACHMENTS Funding Agreement for RTD Funding of Local Transportation Services -Englewood art Shuttle Art Shuttle Ridership Report Bill for an Ordinance • • • • • FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR RTD FUNDING OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (ENGLEWOOD art SHUTTLE) This Funding Agreement for RTD Funding of Local Transportation Services (Englewood art Shuttle) ("Agreement") is made this <//·A.. day of t:Jpn..··'-, 2014, between the Regional Transportation District, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado organized pursuant to the Regional Transportation District Act, C.R.S. § 32-9-101, et seq., ("RTD") and the City of Englewood, Colorado, a Colorado home rule city ("Local Entity"). The Local Entity and RTD may also be referred to herein individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties". RECITALS A. RTD is authorized by the Regional Transportation District Act, C.R.S. §§ 32-9- 101, et seq . (the "RTD Act''), to develop, maintain, and operate a mass transportation system for the benefit of the inhabitants of its District, as defined by the RTD Act. B. Pursuant to the Colorado Constitution, Article XIV, Section 18(2)(a), and C.R.S . §§ 29-1-203 et seq., both RTD and the Local Entity may cooperate or contract with each other to provide any function, service, or facility lawfully authorized to each, and any such contract may provide for sharing of costs . c. RTD currently operates a variety of fixed-route bus, light rail, and other transit services in and around the Local Entity . D. The Parties agree that the transit services described in Exhibit A ("Services") provide mobility and access to the business and residential areas in and around the Local Entity. E. RTD wishes to financially contribute to the provision of the Services according to the terms and conditions as agreed by the Parties , as set forth here in. TERMS AND CONDITIONS NOW THEREFORE , in consideration of the foregoing premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows. 1. GENERAL. A. Exhibits. The following exhibits are attached and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference: Exhibit A: Exhibit B: Exhibit C: Description of the Services Description of the RTD Funding Communication and Notices -Contacts 2. Exhibit D: Special Provisions B. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein by this reference. C. Scope. The Parties may have previously entered into various other agreements which remain in effect until terminated and are not voided by or otherwise amended by this Agreement, unless expressly set forth herein. OPERA TIO NS, MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF THE SERVICES. The Local En t ity shall continue to manage and operate, either directly or through its designated agent(s), the Services. The Local Entity and /or its designated agent(s) shall be solely responsible for all operations, management, marketing, administration, and Services delivery functions, including provision of vehicles , vehicle maintenance, insurance and accounting. Except as specifically provided herein, R TD shall have no responsibility for the operations and management of the Services. R TD shall have no responsibility for, or authority or control with respect to , the supervision and management of any employees or contractors who work in connection with the Services. The Local Entity shall operate the Services in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, orders , codes, directives, permits , approvals, decisions , decrees, ordinances or by-laws having the force of law and any common or civil law, including any amendment , extension or re-enactment of any of the same, and all other instruments , orders and regulations made pursuant to statute (collectively, "Laws"), and the Local Entity shall be solely responsible for compliance with all applicable Laws. Notwithstanding RTD's right to cease funding as provided in this Agreement , RTD has no obligation or intent , nor right pursuant to this Agreement, to otherwise continue the Services, if the Local Entity ceases to provide the Services. 3. SERVICES. The hours , frequency , routes and schedule of the Services ("Operating Parameters ") shall be as shown on Exhibit A . No changes shall be made to the Operating Parameters during the term of this Agreement without the written agreement of both Parties, or if changes are made to the Operating Parameters without the written consent of RTD, then RTD may, at its sole option, terminate this Agreement without any notice . In the event that RTD terminates this Agreement in accordance with this Section 3, RTD will not provide any funding for Services outside the Operating Parameters . 4. RTD FUNDING. In partial support of the Services, RTD will reimburse the Local Entity for the Net Cost of the Services up to the amount and for the term set out in Exhibit B ("RTD Funding''). RTD Funding does not include any additional operating costs for services in excess of the Operating Parameters as set out in Exhibit A, including any special events and holidays . Under no circumstances will RTD be obligated to pay more than the RTD Funding . FUNDING AGREEM ENT FOR RTD FUNDING OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (EN GLEWOOD art SHUTTLE) Page 2 • • • • • • 5. INVOICING AND PAYMENT. A. The Local Entity will submit an invoice to RTD on a monthly basis for payment of the RID Funding. Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the invoice shall include an itemized list of reimbursable operating expenses and a summary of service hours, mileage, passenger boardings, and any other information that RTD otherwise reasonably requests. B. RTD will pay all approved invoices within thirty calendar (30) days after RTD has received the invoice. If RTD does not approve an invoice from the Local Entity, RTD will provide a written explanation of disputed items within ten (10) calendar days after RTD has received the invoice . 6. RECORDS. The Local Entity, or its designated agent, will maintain full and complete financial records for the provision of the Services. Such records shall include any financial information to support and document the operating costs and revenues relating to the Services and any other financial information specifically requested by RID . The Local Entity, or its designated agent , shall make these records available to RTD for audit for a period of three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement. If applicable, National Transit Database ("NTD ") data shall be kept in accordance with Federal Transit Administration ("FTA") requirements and shall be reported as part of RTD's NTD submission. 7 . MARKETING. A. The Services will not be designated, marketed, or promoted as an R TD-branded service, except that the Local Entity shall allow RTD to display an appropriate RTD logo stating that the Services are "in partnership with RTD" on all vehicles used to furnish the Services and financially supported in part by RTD through this Agreement. B. The Local Entity and/or its designated agent(s) will market the Services , and such marketing will include but is not limited to developing a marketing plan and implementing the plan. A marketing plan may include the following elements: advertising , public relations , collateral materials, websites , coordination with other transportation programs, outreach, and training. R TD will have the opportunity to review and approve any marketing materials for the Services. 8. SERVICE MONITORING. RTD reserves the right , in its sole discretion, to set and to assess the performance expectations of the Services. If RTD determines that the RTD Funding is not warranted in accordance with RTD's performance expectations, RTD shall notify the Local Entity as soon as practicable. FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR RTD FUNDING OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (ENGLEWOOD art SHUTTLE) Page 3 9. 10. LIABILITY AND INSURANCE. A. The Parties agree that RTD shall have no liability to third parties arising out of the operations or management of the Services, or any other service operated, directly or indirectly, by the Local Entity, and the Local Entity shall have no liability to third parties arising out of the operations or management of any RID services. This provision shall survive termination of this Agreement. B. The Local Entity and/or its designated agent(s) shall cause RID and its officers and employees to be named as additional insured on all insurance policies covering any operations of the Services. C. Without waiving the privileges and immunities conferred by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, C.R.S. § 24-10-101 et seq., each Party shall be responsible for any claims, demands or suits arising out of its ovvn negligence. It is specifically understood and agreed that nothing contained in this section or elsewhere in this Agreement shall be construed as an express or implied waiver by either Party of its governmental immunity including limitations of amounts or types of liability or the governmental acceptance by either Party of liabilities arising as a result of actions which lie in tort or could lie in tort in excess of the liabilities allowable under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, C.R.S. § 24- 10-101 et seq. GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. Available Funding. This Agreement does not contain any multiple-fiscal year financial obligations by either Party that extend beyond its current fiscal year. The financial obligations of each Party under this Agreement shall be subject to and limited by the appropriation of sufficient funds therefore by its governing body. Funds for this Agreement, as set out in Exhibit B, have been budgeted, authorized and appropriated by the R TD Board of Directors only for the current fiscal year. If the Parties intend to provide RTD Funding for future years, Exhibit B must be amended in accordance with Section 1 O.D. Nothing herein obligates RTD to budget, authorize or appropriate funds for any future fiscal year. B. Other Sources of Funding. Nothing in this Agreement will prevent the Local Entity from collecting contributions or fees from entities other than RID to help defray any unreimbursed costs of providing the Service, except that RTD shall not be a party to any such arrangement. C. Merger. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and all prior agreements, understandings or FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR RTD FUNDING OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (ENGLEWOOD art SHUTTLE) Page4 • • • • • • D. E. F. G. negotiations shall be deemed merged herein. No representations, warranties, promises or agreements, express or implied, shall exist between the Parties, except as stated herein Amendment. No amendment to this Agreement shall be made or deemed to have been made unless in writing executed and delivered by the Party to be bound thereby. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted and enforced according to the laws of the State of Colorado, the ordinances of the City, the applicable provisions of federal law, and the applicable rules and regulations promulgated under any of them. Venue for any action hereunder shall be in Denver District Court, Colorado. Communication and Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices or reports required by this Agreement shall be sufficiently delivered if sent by the Parties in the United States mail, postage prepaid, or by email to the Parties at the following addresses specified on Exhibit C. The addresses or contacts may be changed by the Parties by written notice to the other Party. Term and Termination. This Agreement shall be deemed to have commenced on January 1, 2014 and shall remain in effect until terminated in writing by the Parties or by court order. Unless otherwise agreed, either Party may terminate this Agreement on sixty (60) calendar days' written notice. In the event of termination by RTD for any reason other than default, RTD shall pay no more than the reimbursable costs of the Services up to the date of termination. All provisions of this Agreement that provide rights or create responsibilities for the Parties after termination shall survive termination of this Agreement. Nothing herein obligates RTD to make funds available for the Services in any future fiscal year, and nothing herein shall imply funding will be renewed at the same or any level. H. Amendment. The Parties may, by written agreement, amend this Agreement or the Exhibits to account for changes in RTD Funding and service levels. Nothing herein obligates either Party to make funds available other than as specifically provided in the attached Exhibits, and nothing herein shall imply funding or service will be renewed at the same or any level. I. Authority. The Parties represent that each has taken all actions that are necessary or that are required by its procedures , bylaws, or applicable law to legally authorize the undersigned signatories to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Parties and to bind the Parties to its terms. FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR RTD FUNDING OF LOCA L TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (ENGLEWOOD art SHUTTLE) Page 5 J. No Effect on RTD Rights or Authority. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit RTD's right to establish routes or services or to perform any functions authorized by C.R.S. § 32-9-101 et. seq. K. Assignment. Other than as specifically provided herein, the Parties agree that they will not assign or transfer any of their rights or obligations under this Agreement without first obtaining the written consent of the other Party. L. Prohibited Interests. No director, officer, employee, or agent of RID shall be interested in any contract or transaction with RID except in his or her official representative capacity unless otherwise provided by the RID Code of Ethics. M. Severability. To the extent that this Agreement may be executed and performance of the obligations of the Parties may be accomplished within the intent of the Agreement, the terms of the Agreement are severable, and should any term or provision hereof be declared invalid or become inoperative for any reason, such invalidity or failure shall not affect the validity of any other terms or provision hereof. N. Waiver. The waiver of any breach of a term hereof shall not be construed as a waiver of any other term, or the same term upon a subsequent breach. 0. No Third-Party Beneficiaries. It is expressly understood and agreed that enforcement of the terms and conditions of this Agreement , and all rights of action relating to such enforcement, shall be strictly reserved to the Parties hereto , and nothing contained in this Agreement shall give or allow any such claim or right of action by any other or third person under this Agreement. It is the express intention of the Parties to this Agreement that any person or entity other than the Parties receiving services or benefits under this Agreement be deemed an incidental beneficiary only . P. Changes in Law. This Agreement is subject to such modifications as may be required by changes in City, state or federal law, or the ir implementing regulations . Any such required modification shall automatically be incorporated into and be part of this Agreement on the effective date of such change as if fully set forth herein. Q. Status of Parties . ( l) The Parties agree that the status of each Party shall be that of an independent contractor to the other, and it is not intended, nor shall it be construed, that one Party or any officer, employee, agent or contractor of such Party is an employee , officer, agent, or representative of the other FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR RTD FUNDING OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (ENGLEWOOD art SHUTTLE) Page 6 • • • • • • R. (2) Party. Nothing contained in the Agreement or documents incorporated by reference herein or otherwise creates any partnership, joint venture, or other association or relationship between the Parties. Any approval, review, inspection, direction or instruction by RTD or any party on behalf of RTD shall in no way affect either Party's independent contractor status or obligation to perform in accordance with this Agreement. Neither Party has authorization , express or implied, to bind the other to any agreements, liability, nor understanding except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. The Local Entity and/or its designated agent(s) shall be responsible for all federal and state taxes and contributions for Social Security, unemployment insurance, income withholding tax, and other taxes measured by wages paid to employees. The Local Entity acknowledges that it and its employees are not entitled to workers' compensation benefits or unemployment insurance benefits from RTD, unless the Local Entity or a third party provides such coverage, and that RTD does not pay for or otherwise provide such coverage. The Local Entity shall provide and keep in force workers' compensation (and provide proof of such insurance when requested by RTD) and unemployment compensation insurance in the amounts required by law, and shall be solely responsible for its own actions, its employees and agents . Paragraph Headings. The captions and headings set forth in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and shall not be construed so as to define or limit its terms and provisions . S. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts. Signatures on separate originals shall constitute and be of the same effect as signatures on the same original. Electronic and faxed signatures shall constitute original signatures. [BALANCE OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR RTD FUNDING OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATIO N SERVICES (ENGLEWOOD art SHUTTLE) Page 7 WHEREFORE, the Parties have entered into this Agreement as of the Effective Date. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT Phillip Pl.. Washington General Manager Approved as to legal form for RTD: ~ Rolf G . Asphaug Deputy General Counsel FUND ING AGREEMENT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD ------------ FOR RTD FUNDING OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (ENGLEWOOD art SHUITLE) Page 8 • • • • • • Span of Service: Weekday- Saturday- Sunday- Holidays- Service Frequency: Weekday Saturday- Sunday- Holidays- Annual Revenue Hours: Weekday- Saturday- Sunday- Holidays- Total FUNDING AGREEMENT Exhibit A Description of the Services 6:30 AM-6:30 PM No service provided No service provided No service provided every 15 minutes Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable 6,120 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable 6,120 FOR RTD FUNDING OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (ENGLEWOOD art SHUITLE) Page9 Exhibit B Description of the RTD Funding Expenses-January 2014 -December 31, 2014 art operating hours expense-6120 hours @ 4 3. 91 per hour art fuel expenses Total Expenses $ 268,729 $ 48,520 $ 317,249 Estimated Farebox Revenue-January 2014-December 2014 Estimated Farebox Revenue* $ 59 ,838 * Because the City offers the art as a fare-free service, Estimated Farebox Revenue is based upon a survey performed in October 2013 by RTD that determined the average fare that would have been collected had the City charged RTD's local fare for the art service, and using the Operating Parameters set out in Exhibit A . R TD Funding* $317,249 (Expenses) $ 59,838 (Estimated Farebox Revenue) RTD Funding $257,411 *The RTD Funding is calculated as the Net Cost of operating the art service up to the amount set out above. Net Cost is calculated as Expenses (all operating costs for the art including fuel but not administrative costs) less Estimated Farebox Revenue. FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR RTD FUNDING OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (ENGLEWOOD art SHUTTLE) Page IO • • • • • • Exhibit C Communication and Notices~ Contacts For the City: City of Englewood Community Development Department 1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, Colorado 80110 Attn: Harold Stitt 303.762.2341 For the RTD: Regional Transportation District 1600 Blake Street Denver, Colorado 80202 Attn: Bruce Abel 3 03 .299 .283 9 FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR RTD FUNDING OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (ENGLEWOOD art SHUTTLE) Page 11 Exhibit D Special Provisions DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING PROGRAM. The Local Entity shall require its contractor providing the Services to establish and implement a drug and alcohol testing program that complies with 49 C.F .R. Part 40 and Part 655, and permit any authorized representative of the United States Department of Transportation or its operating administrations, the State Oversight Agency of Colorado, or the Regional Transportation District, to inspect the facilities and records associated with the implementation of the drug and alcohol testing program as required under 49 CFR Part 40 and 655 and review the testing process. The Local Entity further agrees to certify annually its compliance with Part 40 and 655 before December 31st of every year and to submit the Management Information System (MIS) reports no later than February th 15 of every year to the Substance Abuse Testing Department, Regional Transportation District, 1600 Blake Street, Denver, CO 80202 . To certify compliance, the Local Entity will use the "Substance Abuse Certifications" in the "Annual List of Certifications and Assurances for Federal Transit Administration Grants and Cooperative Agreements ," which is published annually in the Federal Register. FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR RTD FUNDING OF LOCAL TRA N SPORTATION SERVICES (E NGLEWOOD art SH UTTLE) Page 12 • • • art Shuttle Ridership Report 2010 Ridership 2014 Ridership Month Ridership Total Average Month Ridership Total Average • January-10 12, 131 12, 131 12, 131 January-14 14,803 14,803 14,803 February-10 12,654 24,785 12,393 February-14 13,952 28,755 14,3 78 March-10 14,672 39,457 13 , 152 March-14 14,494 43,249 14,416 April-10 14,253 53,710 13,428 April-14 15,239 58,488 14,622 May-10 13,047 66,757 13 ,351 May-14 13,811 72 ,299 14,460 June-10 14,717 81 ,474 13,579 June-14 14,245 86,544 14,424 July-10 13,876 95,350 13,621 July-14 15,379 101 ,923 14,560 August-10 15,804 111 , 1 54 13,894 August-14 14,467 116,390 14,549 September-10 15,616 126,770 14,086 September-14 15,070 131,460 14,607 October-10 14,852 141,622 14, 162 October-14 15, 149 146,609 14,661 November-10 14,043 155 ,665 14, 151 November-1 4 12, 111 158,720 14,429 December-10 15,390 171,055 14,255 December-14 13 ,629 172 ,349 14,362 2011 Ridership 2015 Ridership Month Ridership Total Average Month Ridership Total Average January-11 14,863 14,863 14,863 January-15 February-11 14,325 29, 188 14,594 February-1 5 March-11 16,934 46, 122 15,374 March-15 April-11 16,081 62,203 15 ,551 April-15 May-11 15 ,547 77,750 15,550 May-15 June-11 16,832 94,582 15 ,764 June-15 July-11 15 ,277 109,859 15,694 July-15 August-11 1 7,461 127,320 15,915 August-15 September-11 16,223 143,543 15 ,949 September-1 5 October-11 15,660 159,203 15 ,920 October-15 November-11 15,494 174,697 15 ,882 November-1 5 December-11 15 ,010 189,707 15 ,809 December-1 5 • 2012 Ridership 2016 Ridership Month Ridership Total Average Month Ridership Total Average January-12 14,892 14,892 14,892 January-16 February-12 15,379 30,271 15, 136 February-16 March-12 16 ,637 46,908 15,636 March-16 April-12 15,575 62,483 15,621 April-16 May-12 16 ,576 79,059 15,812 May-16 June-12 16 ,324 95,383 15,897 June-16 July-12 15,782 111,165 15,881 July-16 August-12 17,802 128,967 16, 121 August-16 September-12 14,345 143,312 15,924 September-16 October-12 17,322 160,634 16,063 October-16 November-12 15,384 176,018 16,002 November-16 December-12 14,208 190,226 15,852 December-16 Month 2013 Ridership Ridership Total Average Month 2017 Ridership Ridership Total Average January-13 15 ,337 15,33 7 15 ,337 January-1 7 February-13 14,354 29,691 14,846 February-1 7 March-13 17,024 46,715 15,572 March-17 April-13 15,202 61,917 15,479 April-1 7 May-13 15 ,564 77,481 15,496 May-17 June-13 13,905 91 ,386 15,231 June-1 7 July-13 14,914 106 ,300 l 5 , 186 July -1 7 August-13 16,308 122,608 15,326 August-17 September-13 14,523 137,131 15,237 September-1 7 • October-13 16,012 153,143 15,314 October-17 November-13 13,827 166,970 15, 179 November-1 7 December-1 3 14, l 80 181, 150 15,096 December-1 7 • • • ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 2015 BY AUTHORITY COUNCIL BILL NO. 2 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ------- A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE "ART" SHUTTLE COST SHARING INTER- GOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. WHEREAS, Council has approved Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA) between the City and the Regional Transportation District (RTD) for funding of the Englewood Circulator Shuttle from 2004 through 2014; and WHEREAS, in 2014, RTD added a provision to their standard Intergovernmental Agreement that provides for either party to amend only the financial commitment under the agreement (Paragraph lOH), for 2015. This allows for a simple amendment to the IGA stipulating the new funding amounts since all other provisions of the IGA will not change; and WHEREAS, the City will reimburse RTD in an amount equal to the local fares that would have been collected had the shuttle operated as a fare service rather than free service; and WHEREAS , for calendar year 2015, the lost fare amount equals $79,531, which has been budgeted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes the First amendment to IGA entitled "Funding Agreement for RTD Funding of Local Transportation Services" (Englewood Art Shuttle) between the Regional Transportation District (RTD) and the City of Englewood, Colorado, as attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 2. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute and attest said Intergovernmental Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Englewood. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 20th day of January, 2015. Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City's official newspaper on the 23rd day of January, 2015 . Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City's official website beginning on the 21st day of • January, 2015 for thirty (30) days. Randy P. Penn, Mayor ATTEST: Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 20th day of January, 2015. Loucrishia A. Ellis • • • • • FIRST AMENDMENT TO FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR RTD FUNDING OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (ENGLEWOOD art SHUTTLE) This FIRST AMENDMENT TO FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR RTD FUNDING OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (ENGLEWOOD art SHUTTLE) ("First Amendment") is hereby made by and between the Regional Transportation District ("RTD") and CITY OF ENGLEWOOD ("LOCAL ENTITY"). RTD and LOCAL ENTITY also may be referred to herein as a "Party" or collectively as the "Parties." RECITALS A. RTD and LOCAL ENTITY entered into an agreement entitled FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR RTD FUNDING OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (ENGLEWOOD art SHUTTLE) dated April 4, 2014 ("Agreement"); B. Section 10.H of the Agreement provides that the Parties may amend the Agreement to account for changes in the RTD Funding by a written agreement; C. In accordance with Section 10.H, RTD and LOCAL ENTITY now desire to amend the Agreement in order to increase the R TD Funding for 2015. Now, therefore, the Parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Except as otherwise stated herein, all initially capitalized terms shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement. If there is any conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control. As modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 2. Exhibit B of the Agreement is stricken and replaced with the revised Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. 3. This Amendment shall become effective upon the last date executed by all Parties . Page 1 of3 I! x H I B I T A IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have duly executed this Amendment to the Agreement. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD By: __________ _ Randy P. Penn Mayor Date: ---------~ ATTEST: By: _________ _ Loucrishia A. Ellis City Clerk Page 2 of3 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT By: ________ _ Phillip A. Washington General Manager & CEO Date: ---------~ APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM for RTD: By: ________ _ Jenifer Ross-Amato Associate General Counsel • • • • • • REVISED EXHIBIT B DESCRIPTION OF THE RTD FUNDING Expenses-January 2015 -December 2015 art operating hours expense-6144 hours @43.10 per hour art fuel expenses Total Expenses $ 264,806 $ 48,520 $ 313,326 Estimated Farebox Revenue-January 2015 -December 2015 Estimated Farebox Revenue* $ 79,531 *Because the City offers the art as a fare-free service, Estimated Farebox Revenue is based upon a survey performed in October 2014 by RTD that determined the average fare that would have been collected had the City charged RTD's local fare for the art service, and using the Operating Parameters set out in Exhibit A. R TD Funding* $313 ,3 26 (Expenses) $ 79,531 (Estimated Farebox Revenue) RTD Funding $233,795 *The RTD Funding is calculated as the Net Cost of operating the art service up to the amount set out above. Net Cost is calculated as Expenses (all operating costs for the art including fuel but not administrative costs) less Estimated Farebox Revenue . Page 3of3 • • • ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 2014/2015 BY AUTHORITY COUNCIL BILL NO. 69 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER GILLIT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 16, CHAPTER 2, SECTION 7, ENTITLED OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS (REZONINGS); AND TITLE 16, CHAPTER 2, SECTION 8, TO BE ENTITLED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) REZONING PROCESS AND REQUIREMENTS, OF THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE 2000. WHEREAS, a Planned Unit Development (PUD) is intended as an alternative to conventional land use regulations resulting in the creation of a unique zone district that offers the City and Applicant forms or qualities of development or amenities not possible through existing base zone districts; and WHEREAS, in 2004 the City adopted the Unified Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Planned Unit Development regulations in the 2004 Unified Development Code were included with other types of rezonings and addressed only the basic elements of PUD size thresholds, criteria, and process; and WHEREAS, in November 2012 the City began the process to modify the Planned Unit Development regulations to address a lack of procedural details in the Unified Development Code; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance is to clarify the regulations for the Planned Unit Development rezoning of property to ensure that new developments integrate with the surrounding land uses; and WHEREAS, the current PUD review process needs to be improved where a specific site plan and detailed architectural designs have not been adequately developed; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission found that additional detail on the submittal requirements for a Planned Unit Development would be helpful to applicants to understand the information required in an application for a PUD and would further help to ensure that the plan provides sufficient detail for the Commission to make an informed decision; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission determined that by consolidating information on Planned Unit Development regulations into one Section of the Development Code and removing Planned Unit Developments from "the Official Zoning Map Amendments" Section will clarify the review process and development standards for PUDs; and WHEREAS, the amendments allow the two step district plan and site plan process to be joined into one or two steps at the option of the developer; and 1 11 bi WHEREAS, District Plans would need to include allowed land uses, maximum density (number of residential units, or square feet of commercial uses), preliminary site plans showing major roads and location of land uses, proposed building heights, recreation areas or major amenities proposed, conceptual layout of utilities, minimum perimeter setbacks, and a traffic impact study; and WHEREAS, Site Development Plans must include building footprints, building sizes, sight lines and shadow studies, pedestrian circulation (sidewalks and paths), drainage features, grading plans, parking areas, landscaping materials, bicycle parking areas, site lighting and conceptual architectural designs; and WHEREAS, this ordinance relocates and consolidates provisions regarding Planned Unit Development (PUD) processes and requirements into one subsection, 16-2-8 EMC to make the requirements easier for applicants to see what is required for a rezoning to a PUD; and WHEREAS, the intent of PUDs is to allow for the creation of a unique zone district and to accomplish that 16-2-7(B)(2) is clarified and moved to 16-2-8(A) and; WHEREAS, the minimum size for a PUD remains the same at one-half acre and; WHEREAS, 16-2-7(C)(2) relating to neighborhood meetings is amended to remove the possible criminal sanctions for City staff regarding reporting: and WHEREAS, public utilities and other government agencies have been added to the City review process to insure that the application is compatible with existing infrastructure; and WHEREAS, 16-2-7(F)(2) and 16-2-7(G)(3) regarding Commission hearings and standards transferred to 16-2-8(G) which outlines the entire approval process; and WHEREAS, 16-2-7(H)(2) removes PUDs from the general rezoning criteria section and transfers it to 16-2-8(F) along with the provision that it be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, 16-2-7(!) repeals the lapsing provision in the current title regarding TSA and base district "rezonings" and this ordinance also clarifies that PUD rezonings do not lapse 16-2-8 (G) because any rezoning is a permanent change and does not lapse; and WHEREAS, 16-2-8(A) through (C) is new language to clarify the intent of and procedures for allowing PUD rezoning; and WHEREAS, 16-2-8(D) lists permitted uses allowed under a PUD; and WHEREAS, 16-2-8(E) describes the requirements for granting a PUD rezoning, some of which exist in the current code and are relocated to this section; and WHEREAS, 16-2-8(F) lists the current criteria for a PUD rezoning which has no major change; and WHEREAS, 16-2-8(G) & (H) clarifies the difference between a PUD District Plan and a PUD • • Site Development Plan which provides more details for the proposed development; and • 2 • • • WHEREAS, 12-2-8(G) & (H) also sets out the process for approval and allows the applicant to choose a one or two step process depending upon the amount of detail provided in the application; and WHEREAS , 16-2-8(!) defines and lists criteria for major and minor amendments to a previously approved PUD and a Site Development Plan; and WHEREAS, 16-2-8(J) reiterates that the appeal process for PUD rezoning is the same as for any other rezoning under Title 16 EMC;and WHEREAS, after a Public Hearing the Englewood Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this Ordinance at their October 7, 2014 meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes amending Title 16, Chapter 2, Section 7, entitled Official Zoning Map Amendments (Rezonings) of the Englewood Municipal Code 2000, to read as follows: 16-2-7: Official Zoning Map Amendments (Rezonings). The City may initially zone annexed property, or the boundaries or areas of any zone district may be changed, or the zone classification of any parcel of land may be changed pursuant to this Section. Rezonings shall not be used as a way to legitimize nonconforming uses or structures, and should not be used when a conditional use, Zoning Variance, or Administrative Adjustment could be used to achieve the same result. Rezonings to a Planned Unit Development district (PUD) or Transit Statioa Area (TSA) distriet are sffiajeet to additioaal shall follow the procedures and criteria as set forth in tffis-Section 16 -2-8 for Planned Unit Developments. A . Initiation. 1. A proposed rezoning may be initiated by any party identified in Section 16-2-3 .A EMC. 2. A rezoning application shall expire one (1) year after submittal unless a public hearing on the application has been held by the Council on or before that date; provided, however, that the City Manager or designee may extend the application for six ( 6) months if the reason for the delay was due to circumstances beyond the control of the applicant. 3 3. }fo application for rezoning property shall be accepted within twelve (12) months following a fina:l decision on a prior rer:oning application relating to all or any portion of that same property. A "final decision" shall mean denial of a rezoning by the Col:lllcil, or '.vithdrai.val of the rezoning application ocClifring after a recoRHnendation of deffial by the Commission. B . Thresholds for Rezoning. 1. Thresholds for Base District Rezonings: a. General. A base district rezoning results in the change of a property's existing base zoning district classification to a base zoning district classification identified in Table 16-3-1.1, other than a PUD or TSA district. b. Minimum District Size. A base district rezoning application shall only be considered for properties greater than thirty-seven thousand~ five hundred (37,500) square feet ofland area and contiguous to a compatible zone district. c. For purposes ofthis Section, "compatible zone districts" are districts within the same base zoning district headings as identified in Table 16-3-1.1 (i.e. R-2- A and R-2-B are compatible zone districts within residential one and ml:llti unit district headings .) The contiguity to compatible zone district requirement does not apply if the rezoning request is consistent with and implements the Comprehensive Plan. Thresholds for Planned UH.it Development (PUD) Rer:oflffigs: &: Genm'6!. A. PUD rezoning resl:llts in the creation of a l:lniE}l:le r:one district that offers the City additional fonns or E}l:lalities of de¥elopment or ameffities not possible tlli'ough other zone districts. The tenns and conditions of each PUD r:one district shall be based on negotiations between the property owner and the City, but all PUD r:one districts fill:lst be consistent with the Comprehensi¥e Plan and applicable pro:visions of this Title. Each PUD zone district must include its own list of permitted and conditional uses and shall identify wfl.at de•<'elopment standards shall apply. If a PUD proposal will require the creation of one (1) or more new lots of record, or amendment of the boundaries or properties of e1<isting lots of record, then appro•<'al of a sl:lbdi•1ision plat shall also be reE}l:lired. b . 1~linim1£1'/t Di&tFiet Sire . A PUD rer:oning application shall only be considered for properties greater than one half 04) acre in area. J 2,. Thresholds for Transit Station Area (TSA) Rezonings: a . District Location. The location of a Transit Station Area (TSA) district shall be consistent with the following criteria: 4 • • • • • • (1) The location of the proposed TSA district shall be consistent with the locations described or depicted for transit-related and/or mixed-use development in the Comprehensive Plan. (2) The TSA district shall be located generally within a one-quarter(~) mile radius of an existing, or a planned and approved light-rail rapid transit station. (3) The one-quarter(~) mile radius may be augmented by an extended area which would include up to a one-half (Yi) mile radius where the area is contiguous to the TSA district and that it can be demonstrated that the area creates a transitional zone when the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a finding that such an extension is a benefit to the adjoining zone districts. b. Minimum District Size. (1) An application to rezone to a TSA district shall include a minimum gross land area of three (3) acres. (2) The City may allow smaller incremental and contiguous additions to an existing TSA district, if the subsequent rezoning application: (a) Includes a minimum gross land area of twenty thousand (20,000) square feet; (b) Is consistent with the intent of the TSA district; (c) Provides uses or a mix of uses complementary to the mix of uses planned or developed in the adjoining, existing TSA district; and ( d) Demonstrates site and building designs that will be compatible with, and integrated with, the adjoining, existing TSA district. C. Pre-Application Review and Neighborhood Meeting. 1. Pre-Application Conference. All applicants for rezoning shall be required to participate in a pre-application conference pursuant to Section 16-2-3.F EMC. 2. Pre-Application Neighborhood Meeting Rei!ionings. Following the pre-application conference, each applicant for a rezoning shall hold a neighborhood meeting in accordance with City procedures to describe their proposal before an application for rezoning can be accepted by the City. The neighborhood meeting is an opportunity for the applicant to describe the proposal as well as for area residents and property owners to offer input about the proposal at an early stage. The applicant shall hold the meeting at a time and location accessible and convenient for the public. The City shall be represented at the meeting. Following the neighborhood meeting +!he City representative shall-™ prepare a written report summarizing the general discussion of the neighborhood meeting and make copies available to the City staff, the applicant, and the public . 5 3. The maximum time between a required neighborhood meeting and a public hearing before the Commission shall not be more than one hundred eighty (180) days. In the event the public hearing is not held within one hundred eighty (180) days, the applicant shall be required to hold another neighborhood meeting. D. Notice. The City Manager or designee shall require that notice of required public hearings be given in accordance with Section 16- 2-3 .G EMC. E. City Review. The City Manager or designee shall review the proposed rezoning, and may refer the application to any City department or agency (including any utility providers. other municipalities or other agency as determined by the City) for its review and comments, and shall prepare a report of its recommendations for review by the Commission and Council. A copy of the report shall be furnished to the applicant. F. Commission Review and Recommendation. 1. Base Distriet Rezoning. a., The Commission shall review the proposed rezoning and the recommendation of City staff, and shall hold a public hearing on the proposed rezoning. Following such hearing, the Commission may make a recommendation to approve, deny, or modify the proposed rezoning. 6 City Staff Review Commission Review Council Decision Official Zoning Map Amendments (Rezonings) • • • • • • 2. b. The Commission may recommend to the Council that an application for an initial zoning or a rezoning be approved upon condition that the applicant, or the applicant's successors and assigns, obtain approval by the Commission and Council of a site plan or subdivision plat of the subject property either prior to Council action, within a certain time after Council action. or prior to any site development . ~-PUD or TSA Rezomag. tr. The CoIDHl:issiofl shall re•1iev1 the proposed PUD or TSA rezoning, and the recommefldatiofls of City staff Ofl both applicatiofls, afld shall hold a pl:lblic hearing Ofl each applicatiofl. &: The Coi:mllissiofl shall thOfl review the proposed PUD or TSA rezoflin:g pursuant to this Sectiofl, and followiHg the pl:l-blic hear.B:g, FRaY recommefld that the Council appro¥e, deey, or appro¥e the proposed rezoniflg with coflditiofls. 3. e-: In its review of the rezoning application, in addition to any other criteria and findings applicable to the decision, the Commission's recommendations shall include its written findings on each of the following points: fB ~-The application is or is not ifl coHforaiance consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and this Title; and ~ .b.,_ The application is or is not coflsisteflt in conformance with adopted and generally accepted development standards of developmeflt in the City. and any other ordinance. law. or requirement of the City; and ~ c. The application is or is not substantially consistent with the goals, objectives, desigH guidelines, and policies and aHY other ordinaHce, la-w, er requiremeflt of the City. G. Council Action. 1. "Base District Rezoflffig Applicatiofls. The Council shall review the proposed rezoning, the recommendation of City staff, and the recommendation of the Commission, and shall hold a public hearing on the proposed amendment. Following such hearing, the Council may approve, deny, or refer a proposed amendment back to the Commission. affl:efld the proposal. ~-PUD and TSA Rezoning. a. The Couflcil shall thOfl rO'liew the proposed PUD or TSA rezoning ifl light of the recommefldatiofl of City staff, afld the recommefldatiofl of the Commissiofl, and shall hold a public hear.ng Ofl the proposed rezoniflg. Follo'.ving such heariflg, the Cooocil Faa)' approve, de~·, or affl:efld the proposed rezoning. ;. ~-Refer Back to Commission. No substantial amendment to an application for a rezoning may be made by the Council after a recommendation on the rezoning has 7 been made by the Commission, unless it is first referred back to the Commission for comment on the proposed substantial amendment. H . Criteria . Rezonings shall be made in the interest of promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of the community, and shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the review-or decision-making body shall only recommend approval of, or shall only approve, a proposed rezoning, if it finds that the proposed rezoning meets the criteria listed below . 1. For base district rezonings, the proposed rezoning shall meets at least one of the following criteria: 2. a. That there has been a material change in the character of the neighborhood or in the City generally, such that the proposed rezoning would be in the public interest and consistent with the change; or b. That the property to be rezoned was previously zoned in error; or c. That the property cannot be developed, or that no reasonable economic use of the property can be achieved, under the existing zoning . The criteria in subsections 1.a through c above shall not apply to the initial zoning of property annexed to the City or to rezonings that may occur incidental to a comprehensive City-initiated revision of the City's Official Zoning Map. For PUD or TSA rezonings, the proposed development shall eomplies comply with all applicable use, aeYelopment, and development ~ standards set forth in this Title that are not otherwise modified or waived according to the rezoning approval; and the proposed rezoning shall meets at least one of the following criteria: a. +hat-tThe proposed development will exceed the development quality standards, levels of public amenities, or levels of design innovation otherwise applicable under this Title, and would not be possible allowed or practicable under a standard zone district with conditional uses or with a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjustments; or b . +hat tihe property cannot be developed, or that no reasonable economic use of the property can be achieved, under the existing zoning, even through the use of conditional uses or a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjustments. 3 . All rezonings shall meet the following criterion: a. The resulting rezoned property will not have a significant negative impact on those properties surrounding the rezoned area and that the general public health, safety and welfare of the community are protected. 8 • • • • • • I. After Approval-Lapsing Period. 1. Base District Rer;oning. An approved ease district rezoning shall not lapse, but shall remain in effect until and unless superoeded superseded by a later or inconsistent amendment to, or replacement of, the Official Zoning Map. HoweYer, ifthe City has required the suemission of a Zoning Site Plan as part of the rezoning process, and has approYed a Zoning Site Plan for the rezoned property, and the Zoning Site Plan later lapses pursl:lant to Section 16 2 9.E EMC, the Coun.cil ffla')' initiate a rezoning of the property to its prior zone B'l:ap designation, or to an alternatiYe designation ffl:ore consistent with the CoB'l:prehensive Plan. 2. PUD or TSA rezoning. An approved PUD or TSA district rezoning shall not lapse, but shall remain in effect until superceded superseded by a later or inconsistent amendment to, or replacement of, the TSA District Official Zoning Map. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes amending Title 16, Chapter 2, by adding a new Section 8, entitled Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezoning Process and Requirement of the Englewood Municipal Code 2000, to read as follows: 16-2-8: Reserved. Planned Unit Deyelonment (pUD) Rezoning Process and Requirements. A. Intent. The PUD Zone District is an alternative to conventional land use regulations resulting in the creation of a unique zone district that offers the City and Applicant forms or qualities of development or amenities not allowed through existing base zone districts . The PUD Zone District combines use. density. height. design and site plan considerations into a unified process. Each PUD Zone District must include its own list of permitted and conditional uses and shall identify what development standards will aooly. The PUD Zone District is specifically intended to: 1. Provide an oooortunity for the developer and the City to review the tvoe and intensity of develonment being proposed. and to identify any elements of the proposed plan that may not comply with existing City development standards. 2. Provide development opportunities not otherwise permitted within existing zone districts by reducing or eliminating the inflexibility that sometimes results from strict application of zoning and development standards. 3. Permit and encourage innovative design. flexibility. and diversity in land planning and development. 4. Provide the opportunity for unified development control for a single parcel or multiple properties in harmony with the environment and respecting the context of the surrounding neighborhoods by establishing design and development standards for the general character of the properties within the PUD. Plan for the general configuration ofland uses. common elements. major transportation and pedestrian circulation elements. utilities and necessarv easements 9 to serve the site and to connect to existing and planned transportation networks. pedestrian networks and utilities. 6. Plan for proposed amenities. such as parks. open space and recreational facilities. 7. Identify natural features of the site that should be enhanced. protected or remain undeveloped . .8_,_ Ensure consistency with the Englewood Comprehensive Plan. ,2. Provide for the public health. safety. integrity and general welfare. and otherwise achieve the purposes provided in the Planned Unit Development Act of 1972 as amended (C.R.S. 24-67-101. et sea} B. Applicabilitv. The provisions ofthis Section shall apply to all lands. uses. and structures to be rezoned to Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zone District. The provisions of this Section shall not apply to : 1. Planned Developments (P.D.) approved prior to July 1. 1996. which shall continue to be governed by the respective development plans and the regulations of the underlying zone districts . However. any major amendments to an existing P.D. as determined by the City Manager or designee. shall require review and approval under the new requirements of this Section. Any land currently zoned PUD. and partially developed prior to the date of the adoption of this Section. Such approved PUDs may continue and complete such development under the terms and conditions of approval for that PUD. However. any major amendments to an existing PUD. as determined by the City. shall require review and aooroval under the new requirements of this Section. C. Initiation . 1. A proposed rezoning may be initiated by any party identified in Section 16-2-3(A) EMC. All property owners within the boundaries of a proposed PUD zone district shall consent in writing to the application for a PUD. 2. A PUD application shall expire one (1) year after submittal unless a public hearing on the application has been held by the Council on or before that date: provided however. that the City Manager or designee may extend the application for six (6) months if the reason for the delay was due to circumstances beyond the control of the applicant. 3. No application for substantially the same PUD shall be accepted within twelve (12) months following a final decision on a prior rezoning application relating to all or any portion of that same property. A "final decision" shall mean denial of a rezoning by the Council. D. Permitted Uses. Uses permitted in a PUD zone district may include any use which is a permitted use in any zone district of the City. or as may be permitted through the unlisted uses determination process of Section 16-5-1 (B) EMC Unlisted Uses. Each PUD 10 • • • • • • ~· application shall include its own list of allowed or conditional uses and shall identify applicable design and development standards. A PUD District Plan or a PUD Site Development Plan may varv the provisions of Title 16 EMC. but only to the extent specifically shown on an approved PUD District Plan or Site Development Plan. General Use and Development Requirements and Limitations. PUDs shall be subject to the following: 1. PUD applications shall only be considered for properties equal to or greater than one-half ( 1/2) acre. 2. Requests for rezoning to a PUD zone district shall be filed on application forms provided by the City. together with all plans. maps and any other information as may be necessarv. reasonable and relevant for review by the City. Applications shall be submitted with fees established by City Council resolution. 3. Requests for rezoning to a PUD zone district shall be authorized in writing by the landowner(s) or an authorized agent. 4. All PUD zone districts shall be established through a map amendment to this Title pursuant to the procedures and criteria set forth in this Title. 5. The terms and conditions of each PUD zone district shall be based on negotiations between the applicant and the City. However. all PUD zone districts shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and applicable provisions of this Title . If a PUD proposal requires the creation of one ( 1) or more new lots of record. or amendment of the boundaries of existing lots of record. then approval of a subdivision plat shall also be required. 7 . The area of land for the PUD zone district may be controlled by one or more landowners and shall be developed under unified control or a unified plan of development. .8_,_ Provisions shall be made for the establishment of an organization for the ownership and maintenance of areas designated as private streets and/or common space unless other adequate arrangements for the ownership and maintenance thereof are provided in a manner acceptable to the City Council. 2,. The PUD zone district shall be subject to all applicable use and development standards of this Title unless otherwise waived or modified by the applicant and approved by City Council in the terms of the approved PUD. F. Approval Criteria. PUD rezonings shall be made in the interest of promoting the health. safety. and general welfare of the community. and shall be consistent with the Comorehensive Plan. In addition the review or decision making body shall only recommend approval of. or shall only approve. a proposed PUD rezoning if it finds that the proposed rezoning meets the criteria listed below: The proposed development shall comply with all applicable use. development. and design standards set forth in this Title that are not otherwise modified or waived 11 according to the rezoning approval. In addition. the proposed rezoning shall meet at least one of the following criteria: ~ The proposed development will exceed the development quality standards: levels of public amenities: or levels of design innovation otherwise applicable under this Title. and the proposed development would not be allowed or practicable under a standard zone district with conditional uses or with a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjustments: or b. The property cannot be developed. or no reasonable economic use of the property can be achieved. under the existing zoning. even through the use of conditional uses or a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjustments. 2. All PUD rezonings shall meet the following criterion: ~ The resulting rezoned property will not have a significant negative impact on those properties surrounding the rezoned area and the general public health. safety and welfare of the community will be protected. G. PUD Approval Process Summary: The Planned Unit Development zone district requires three (3) steps for PUD project review and approval: 1) Pre-application review and neighborhood meeting: 2) PUD District Plan review and approval: 3) PUD Site Development Plan review and approval. If an applicant provides site-specific development plans. the PUD District Plan and PUD Site Development Plan steps may be combined. The PUD rezoning may be processed in one phase or two. at the option of the developer. A complete and final PUD shall not take effect until and unless all of the information required below for both a PUD District Plan and a PUD Site Development Plan have been reviewed and approved by the City. The PUD District Plan is a general plan for the land within the boundaries of the application. and includes general land uses and densities. building heights. general design intent. parking ratios. and a conceptual layout of the site. Approval of PUD District Plan requires a later approval of a PUD Site Development Plan prior to any development or issuance of a Building Permit. The PUD Site Development Plan is a more detailed plan for the development of the site by applying the standards set forth in the District Plan. but shall also include a statement of architectural intent: design standards necessarv to achieve the architectural intent: location of major transportation and circulation systems: parking standards: landscaping requirements: common elements and other details required to demonstrate that the development will meet or exceed the standards set forth on the District Plan and the qualities of development otherwise required by City standards in the base zone district. Pre-Application Conference and Neighborhood Meeting: Applicant shall submit a preliminarv proposal indicating the property to be included in the proposed PUD: the size of the land in acres and square feet: proposed land uses: maximum density and/or number of units: anticipated building heights: and approximate location of major circulation elements. Staff may review the preliminarv proposal and provide 12 • • • • • • written comments and recommendations to potential applicants . No project approval is implied or granted at this early review stage . Neighborhood Meeting: Following the pre-application conference. each applicant for a PUD shall hold a neighborhood meeting in accordance with City Procedures to describe their proposal before an application for rezoning can be accepted by the City. The neighborhood meeting is an opportunity for the applicant to describe the proposal as well as for area residents and property owners to off er input about the proposal at an early stage. The applicant shall hold the meeting at a time and location accessible and convenient for the public. The City shall be represented at the meeting. Following the neighborhood meeting. the City representative may orepare a written report summarizing the general discussion of the neighborhood meeting and make copies available to the City staff. the applicant. and the public . The maximum time between a required neighborhood meeting and a public hearing before the Commission shall not be more than one hundred eighty Cl 80) days . In the event the public hearing is not held within one hundred eighty Cl 80) days. the applicant shall be required to hold another neighborhood meeting. 2. Notice. The City Manager or designee shall require that notice of required public hearings be given in accordance with Section 16-2-3. CG) EMC . 3. City Review . The City Manager or designee shall review the proposed PUD. and may refer the application to any City department or agency (including any utility providers. other municipalities or other agency as determined in the City) for its review and comments. and shall prepare a report of its recommendations for review by the Commission and Council. A copy of the report shall be furnished to the applicant. 4 . Commission Review and Recommendation. The Commission shall review the proposed PUD and the recommendation of City staff and shall hold a public hearing on the PUD . Following such hearing the Commission may make a recommendation to approve. aoorove with conditions. deny. or modify the PUD. W In its review of the PUD application. in addition to any other criteria and findings aoolicable to the decision. the Commission's recommendations shall include its written findings on each of the following points : 1. The aoolication is or is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and this Title: and 2. The application is or is not in conformance with adopted and generally accepted development standards. and any other ordinance. law or requirement of the City: and 3. The application is or is not substantially consistent with the goals. objectives. and policies of the City . 13 5. Council Action. The Council shall review the proposed PUD. the recommendation of the City staff. and the recommendation of the Commission. and shall hold a public hearing on the proposed PUD. Following such hearing. the Council may approve. deny. or refer a moposed PUD back to the Commission for modifications based on the requirements of this Title. Q,_ After Approval -Lapsing Period. An approved PUD shall not lapse. but shall remain in effect until superseded by a later or inconsistent amendment to. or replacement of. the PUD or the Official Zoning Map. g. Following approval of a PUD and the execution of all certificates appearing on the final PUD document. the applicant shall submit the final PUD and all other required documents to the City and the City shall record them with the Arapahoe County Clerk and Recorder. All expenses for recording shall be borne by the applicant and be paid prior to recording . H. Submittal Requirements . PUD District Plan: The PUD District Plan shall include all submittal requirements as listed below. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make a recommendation to City Council for final action on a PUD District Plan zoning request. If a PUD District Plan is submitted for review without inclusion of a PUD Site Development Plan. then the Planning and Zoning Commission action on the PUD District Plan shall include a recommendation for final action on the Site Development Plan. which may include requiring review by staff only. review at a public hearing by the Planning and Zoning Commission. and additional review at a public hearing by the City Council. depending upon the size. uses. and complexity of the plan or issues remaining for review. PUD Site Development Plan: If a PUD Site Development Plan is submitted with a PUD District Plan. the Site Development Plan shall be reviewed at the same time as the PUD District Plan. If a PUD Site Development Plan is submitted subsequently to a PUD District Plan. then the Site Development Plan shall be reviewed as specified in the approved District Plan. ~ PUD District Plan: The applicant shall submit for City review a minimum of twelve (12) sets of the proposed PUD District plan. Applications shall be deemed complete only upon submittal of all required information and payment of all application fees . Review will not occur until the application is complete. The PUD District Plan shall be sufficiently detailed to indicate the general land uses: locations: development densities and/or minimum lot areas per unit: building heights. major transportation and circulation elements: the intended design character of the development and shall include but shall not be limited to. the following: a. The name and location of the proposed development: and The names. addresses and phone numbers of the applicants. owners. developers and designers of the development: and 14 • • • • • • Documentation confinning that the applicant has legally sufficient interest in the property proposed for development. or is the duly authorized agent of such a person: and d. A PUD District Plan. drawn at a scale of not less than one inch per fifty feet ( 1 "=50 ') along with north arrow. written and graphic scale. of the proposed development. The District Plan shall be of sufficient detail to determine impacts. both on and off-site that may require mitigation. The District Plan shall additionally include the following. where aoolicable: ill A boundarv survey and legal description prepared by a Colorado registered Professional Land Surveyor. ill A description of the location of the property. and an identification of the primary developments. sensitive areas and other surrounding uses. features and major transportation networks in the immediate vicinity of the property. ill Adjacent streets. proposed points of access and internal vehicular circulation routes. ~ Existing zoning and land use for all properties within at least three hundred feet (300') of all property boundarv lines. ill Location and area of proposed land uses. including private. public and quasi-public facilities: for plans with multiple uses. applicant shall provide a land use schedule listing permitted land uses. !fil Maximum heights of proposed structures. ill Parking ratios for allowed uses. plus a statement of the intent to use surface or structured parking. ffil The maximum allowed density of the site. including any density maximums or minimums on individual uses. ,(fil A description of the intended parks. recreation and open space features necessarv and major amenities proposed to achieve the intended goal of the development. including the approximate location and area of open space and recreation areas. ilill General intent and location of landscape areas. including percent of site dedicated to natural and landscaped areas. and transitional buffer areas. illl Location of existing bus stops. bike paths and pedestrian networks. ill) The existing topography of the land and existing natural features. together with areas subject to 5-year and 100-year flooding. ill) Locations of any existing easements on the property . 15 W) Required major extensions of utilities. including conceptual layout of utilities and storm sewer systems . !lil A description of the architectural design concept and development standards for exterior building materials sufficient to demonstrate that the development will be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood or will achieve a higher level of design . Development standards shall include a list of allowed and prohibited exterior materials. standards for articulation of street facing facades. and minimum transparency (windows) for building elevations. ilfil Minimum perimeter setbacks and other setbacks as aporopriate . il1l A Traffic Impact Study describing existing conditions. projected traffic generation from the new development. and anticipated impacts on the external street network in the vicinity of the proposed PUD. ilfil A written statement generally describing the proposed PUD and the market which it is intended to serve. its relationship to the Comorehensive Plan. and how the design and architectural concept of the proposed PUD will relate to adjacent propertv. Where the aoolicant's objectives are not substantially consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. the statement shall include the changed or changing conditions that justify approval of the proposal. !121 Other information deemed necessary. reasonable. and relevant to evaluate the application as determined by City Manager or designee. Planning and Zoning Commission. or City Council. 3. PUD Site Development Plan: After or concurrent with the review of the PUD District Plan. the applicant shall submit for City review a minimum of twelve (12) sets of the proposed PUD Site Development Plan. Applications shall be deemed complete only upon submittal of all required submittal information and payment of applicable fees. Review will not occur until the application is complete. The PUD Site Development Plan may include the entire area within the PUD District Plan or the PUD Site Development Plan may consist of one or more phases. provided however. that the approval of any one phase may be contingent on improvements that involve other or all phases. The PUD Site Development Plan shall be sufficiently detailed and shall contain such information and documentation to fully indicate the ultimate operation and appearance of the project and shall include. but shall not be limited to. the following: a. A boundary survey and legal description prepared by a Colorado registered Professional Land Surveyor. b. Structure footprints. locations. gross floor areas. building heights and dimensioned setbacks from streets. as well as other structures and other features . Sight lines and shadow studies. 16 • • • • • • Locations of major vehicular circulation system elements. including streets . curb cuts. and parking areas. Circulation systems shall be designed to connect with existing or planned street networks. e. Pedestrian circulation elements including sidewalks. pathways. bus stops. plazas. with materials indicated: pedestrian circulation systems shall be designed to connect with existing or planned sidewalks and pathways. i g, h. k 1. k. l m. Drainage features including retention and detention areas. Overall grading showing existing and proposed grades. Location. dimensions and descriptions of all existing utility easements on the property. Parking areas and a oreliminarv design of internal circulation for parking areas or structures. Location and amount of bicycle parking. Loading and trash areas. A schedule of dwelling units (if applicable) by building. and dwelling unit density based on units divided by acres of net lot area remaining after right-of- way dedications . Location and area of parks. open space and recreation facilities. including amounts and locations of play areas for children and other recreational areas shown on the PUD District Plan. n. Landscaping to include a material schedule listing quantities. plant tvoes (e.g. deciduous street trees. evergreen shrubs. etc.). common name. minimum size at planting. area calculations for required and provided landscape area. Q,_ Fences. walls or year-round natural screen planting and landscaping when necessarv to shield adjacent residential areas from commercial. industrial and parking areas. 0,; Site lighting elements. including street lights. pedestrian lights and any other lighting elements. ,g,. Areas subject to flooding from a major storm including the 5-year and 100- year storms. detention and retention areas and provisions for controlled release of water from detention or retention areas following a major storm. r,, Site signage locations. and lighting of signs including specifically adopted sign standards where applicable. Public amenities that may be included in the development proposal. including public art . 17 Conceptual building elevations that illustrate how the design standards established in the PUD District Plan are being implemented. including architectural concepts. facade treatments. and exterior building materials. as necessary to establish how the proposed PUD uses and structures relate internally and/or to the neighboring properties. u. Other information deemed necessarv. reasonable. and relevant to evaluate the application as determined by City Manager or designee. Planning and Zoning Commission. or City Council. L Amendments. 1. District Plan Amendments. a. Major Amendments to the PUD District Plan: Major amendments may be made to the approved Planned Unit Development District Plan pursuant to the procedures as orovided within this Section 16-2-8 EMC. including a neighborhood meeting. Major amendments shall include any of the following: ill An increase in the maximum building height beyond that allowed in the approved PUD District Plan. ill An increase in the maximum allowed density or number of units beyond that allowed in the approved PUD District Plan. ill A change in land use to a use not otherwise allowed in the approved PUD District Plan. ill A reduction of the perimeter setbacks from those required in the approved PUD District Plan. ill A reduction in the amount of landscaping required in the approved PUD District Plan. (fil An increase in the allowed lot coverage above that approved in the PUD District Plan. ffi Any change not considered a minor amendment by the City Manager or designee. b. Minor Amendments to the PUD District Development Plan: The City Manager or designee may approve minor amendments in the location of structures or facilities. or location of streets or walkways if required by engineering or other circumstances not foreseen at the time the Planned Unit Development District Plan was approved so long as no amendment violates any standard or regulation set forth in this Section: or any change not listed as a "Major Amendment" in Section 16-2-8CD(l)(a) above. 18 • • • • • • Site Development Plan Amendments: All PUD Site Development Plans and documents may be changed and/or amended in whole or in part from time to time as provided in this Section. a. Major Amendments to PUD Site Development Plans: PUD Site Development Plans approved and recorded hereunder may only be amended as provided in Section 16-2-8(H)(3) and CG) EMC. This shall include those amendments which meet any of the following criteria: ill A change in the character of the development: or ill A change in the allowed land uses: or al A change in the general location of land uses: or ill An increase in the maximum allowed building or structure height: or ill An increase in the number of dwelling units. or in the ratio of the gross floor area of structures to the land area. or increases in the proposed gross floor area within any particular land use: or ill A change in the reauired setbacks from property lines. or "build-to" lines: or ill An increase of more than two percent (2%) in ground coverage by structures or surface parking: or ill A reduction by more than two percent (2%) in the land area designated for landscaping: or !fil A reduction in the ratio of off-street parking and loading space to gross floor area or number of dwelling units in structures: or UQ1 A change affecting the access from and through public rightt>-of-way. b.. Minor Amendments to PUD Site Development Plan: The City. through the City Manager or designee. may authorize minor deviations from the PUD Site Development Plan when such deviations appear necessary in light of technical or engineering considerations. Minor Amendments shall not be permitted for any changes included with the list of Major Amendments in Section 16-2- 8CDC2)(a) above. L Appeals. 1. PUD District Plan: The applicant may appeal any determination or action taken by the City Council under this Chapter to an Arapahoe County Court of competent jurisdiction. Said appeal to the court must comply with Rule 106 of Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure . 19 2. PUD Site Development Plan: The applicant may appeal any determination or action taken by the City Council under this Chapter to an Arapahoe County court of competent jurisdiction. Said appeal to the court must comply with Rule 106 of Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure. Editor's note -Ord. 08-48, § 4, adopted Sept. 15, 2008, deleted 16-2-8, which pertained to overall concept plan review and derived from Ord. 04-5. Section 3. Safety Clauses. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Englewood, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public, and that this Ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be obtained. Section 4. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder of this Ordinance or it application to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Inconsistent Ordinances. All other Ordinances or portions thereof inconsistent or conflicting with this Ordinance or any portion hereof are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency or conflict. Section 6. Effect of repeal or modification. The repeal or modification of any provision of the Code of the City of Englewood by this Ordinance shall not release, extinguish, alter, modify, or change in whole or in part any penalty, forfeiture, or liability, either civil or criminal, which shall have been incurred under such provision, and each provision shall be treated and held as still remaining in force for the purposes of sustaining any and all proper actions, suits, proceedings, and prosecutions for the enforcement of the penalty, forfeiture, or liability, as well as for the purpose of sustaining any judgment, decree, or order which can or may be rendered, entered, or made in such actions, suits, proceedings, or prosecutions. Section 7. Penalty. The Penalty Provision of Section 1-4-1 EMC shall apply to each and every violation of this Ordinance. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 15th day of December, 2014. Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City's official newspaper on the 19th day of December, 2014. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City's official website beginning on the 17th day of December, 2014 for thirty (30) days. A Public Hearing was held on January 5, 2015. Read by title and passed on final reading on the 20th day of January, 2015. Published by title in the City's official newspaper as Ordinance No._, Series of 2015, on the 23rd day of January, 2015. 20 • • • • • • Published by title on the City 's official website beginning on the 21st day of January, 2015 for thirty (30) days. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after publication following final passage. Randy P . Penn, Mayor ATTEST: Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No ._, Series of 2015 . Loucrishia A. Ellis 21 • • • BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 2014/2015 COUNCIL BILL NO. 71 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER JEFFERSON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 16, CHAPTER 6, SECTIONS 1AND3, OF THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE 2000 PERTAINING TO MINIMUM LOT WIDTHS FOR MULTI-UNIT DWELLINGS IN THE MU-R-3-B AND MU-R-3-C ZONE DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, errors were made related to the minimum lot widths for multi-unit dwellings when Section 16-6-l(C)(l), was added as part of a UDC amendment in Ordinance No. 37, Series of2008; and WHEREAS, the errors are discrepancies between UDC Table 16-6-1.1: Summary of Dimensional Requirements, and UDC Section 16-6-l(C)(l) Multi-Unit Development Standards for the MU-R-3-B and MU-R-3-C zone districts; and WHEREAS, there was no minimum lot width required for a multi-unit dwelling in Table 16- 6-1.1; and WHEREAS, Section 16-6-l(C)(l) requires a minimum lot width of "twenty-five feet (25') per unit for properties with alley access", and "thirty feet (30') per unit" for properties with out alley access which is a direct conflict with Table 16-6-1.1 EMC; and WHEREAS, the intent of the 2008 Ordinance related to impacts of front loaded garages makes it clear that the intent of the Ordinance was to not require a minimum lot width for multi- unit dwellings in the MU-R-3-B and MU-R-3-C zone districts; and WHEREAS, this proposed ordinance will amend the UDC and correct the discrepancy between these two sections of the Zoning Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes amending Title 16, Chapter 6, Section 1 entitled Dimensional Requirements of the Englewood Municipal Code 2000, to read as follows: 16-6: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. 16-6-1: Dimensional Requirements EDITORS NOTE: Title 16-6-1 (A) and (B), contain no changes and are therefore not included here. 1 11 b ii c. Additional Dimensional and Development Standards. 1. Multi-Unit Development Standards in R-2-A, R-2-B, MU-R-3-A and MU-R-3-B end MU R 3 C Districts. a . Applicability. The following standards apply to all multi-unit dwellings constructed or converted after the effective date of this Section. b . Multi-unit dwellings existing on the effective Date ofthis Section and which as of that date are not in compliance with standards established by this Section, shall not be considered nonconforming due solely to the dwelling's noncompliance with the standards of this Section. Such dwellings are "grandfathered," and shall be considered legal, conforming structures for the purposes of sale and development under this Title. c. Property having rear alley access. (1) Minimum lot width shall be twenty-five feet (25') feet per unit except in the MU-R-3-B District the minimum lot width shall be per Table 16-6- 1.1 EMC. (2) Driveway access from the public street shall be prohibited, except for: (a) Comer lots where garage, carport or parking pad may be accessed from the side street. (b) Dwellings with four ( 4) or more units may have one driveway accessing the street. (3) Parking pads within the front yard or front setback shall be prohibited. d. Property without rear alley access. (1) Minimum lot width shall be thirty feet (30') per unit.,.; except in the MU- R-3-B District the minimum lot width shall be per Table 16-6-1.1 EMC. (2) Garages, carports and parking pads shall be off-set behind the front building line of each unit by a minimum of five feet (5'). (3) Minimum separation between driveways or parking pads of attached units shall be twenty feet (20'). ( 4) Maximum driveway and/or parking pad width within front yard or front setback shall be ten feet (10') per unit. ( 5) The maximum garage door width on the front facade of the structure shall be 9 feet per unit. (6) A parking pad may be located in the front yard or front setback only when a garage or carport is not provided. 2 • • • • • • (7) An opaque fence or wall shall be provided between driveways or parking pads on adjacent properties. (8) Units that provide attached garages behind the rear building line of the principal structure may reduce the principal structure's rear setback to ten feet (10'). (9) It is recognized that because of the wide variety of multi-unit development options, the City Manager or designee may on a case-by- case basis consider minor deviations to d (2) through (7) above, whenever such deviations are more likely to satisfy the intent of this subsection. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes amending Title 2, Chapter 16, Section 3, Subsection F, entitled Streets and Vehicle Access and Circulation of the Englewood Municipal Code 2000, to read as follows: 16-6-3: Streets and Vehicle Access and Circulation. EDITORS NOTE: Title 16-6-3 (A) through (E), contain no changes and are therefore not included here. F. Vehicle Access and Circulation . 1. Access to Public Roads. All new lots shall have direct or indirect access to a dedicated public street, through one (1) or more access points approved by the City. In addition to direct access to a dedicated public street, access may be provided through private streets or through alleys. a. No back-out driveways from any type of use shall be permitted onto an arterial street. b. No back-out driveways or back-out parking spaces from multi-unit residential on sites with alley access, commercial, or industrial uses shall be permitted onto a public street. This requirement shall not prohibit back-out driveways or parking spaces onto an alley. 2. Traffic Impact Analysis. A traffic impact analysis (TIA) shall be required with applications for development review and approval when trip generation during any peak hour is expected to exceed one hundred (100) vehicles, based on traffic generation estimates when trip generation during any peak hour is expected to exceed one hundred (100) vehicles, based on traffic generation estimates of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Generation Manual (or any successor publication). The City may also require a TIA for: a. Any project that proposes access to a street with level of service (LOS) "D" or below; b. Any application for a rezoning; 3 c. Any case where the previous TIA for the property is more than two (2) years old; d. Any case where increased land use intensity will result in a fifteen percent (15%) or greater increase in traffic generation; and e. Any case in which the traffic engineer determines that a TIA should be required because of other traffic concerns that may be affected by the proposed development. f. When access points are not defined or a Zoning Site Plan is not available at the time the TIA is prepared, additional studies may be required when a Zoning Site Plan becomes available or the access points are defined. 3. New Intersections and Curb-Cuts. a. General Rules. The number of intersections and curb-cuts on streets and highways shall be minimized consistent with the basic needs of ingress and egress. Intersections and curb-cuts shall be designed to provide the greatest safety for both pedestrians and motorists. b. Driveways, Residential. (1) One-Unit and Multi-Unit Dwellings Containing Up to Three (3) Units. (a) The width of any driveway leading from the public street to a one- unit dwelling, or multi-unit dwelling containing up to three (3) units shall not exceed twenty feet (20') at its intersection with the street. (b) See also Section 16 6 lG.4 16-6-HC)Cl) EMC, "Multi-Unit Development Standards in R-2-A, R-2-B, MU-R-3-A, and MU-R-3-B, and Ii.ill R 3 G Districts," for additional driveway standards that apply to multi-unit dwellings on properties with or without alley access. (c) See also Section 16-6-10.B. EMC, "Residential Design Standards and Guidelines," for additional driveway standards that apply to new residential development, including substantial expansions or alterations of existing dwellings, in the R-1, R-2, and R-3 zone districts. (2) Multi-Unit Dwellings Containing Four (4) or More Units. (a) The width of any entrance driveway to a multi-unit dwelling containing four (4) or more units shall not exceed twenty-five feet (25') at its intersection with the street, unless the applicant can demonstrate that additional width is required to adequately accommodate anticipated driveway volumes. 4 • • • • • • (b) In new multi-unit developments not located within MU-R-3-C, M-1, M-2 and M-0-2 districts containing ten (10) or more units, vehicular access shall be spaced no closer than twenty-five feet (25') to any adjacent property line. However, the City may reduce this setback requirement to permit a single vehicular access point that can serve two (2) adjacent properties or where compliance with these requirements would deny vehicular access to a property. c. Driveways, Nonresidential. The location and size of driveways leading from the public street to a nonresidential or mixed-use building is subject to the following conditions: (1) No portion of any driveway shall be closer than forty feet (40') to the curb line of an intersecting street, or closer than ten feet ( 1 O') from a fire hydrant, catch basin, or end of curb radius at comers. (2) In new non-residential developments not located within MU-R-3-C, M- l, M-2, and M-0-2 districts, vehicular access shall be spaced no closer than twenty-five feet (25') to any adjacent property line. However, the City may reduce this setback requirement to permit a single vehicular access point that can serve two (2) adjacent properties or where compliance with these requirements would deny vehicular access to a property . (3) Only one (1) access per street frontage shall be permitted, unless a Zoning Site Plan or traffic impact analysis shows, and the City agrees, that additional access points are required to adequately accommodate driveway volumes and that additional access will not be detrimental to traffic flow. (4) The width of any entrance driveway shall not exceed thirty feet (30') measured along its intersection with the property line. Section 3. Safety Clauses. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Englewood, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public, and that this Ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be obtained. Section 3. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder of this Ordinance or it application to other persons or circumstances. Section 4. Inconsistent Ordinances. All other Ordinances or portions thereof inconsistent or conflicting with this Ordinance or any portion hereof are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency or conflict. 5 Section 5. Effect of repeal or modification. The repeal or modification of any provision of the Code of the City of Englewood by this Ordinance shall not release, extinguish, alter, modify, or change in whole or in part any penalty, forfeiture, or liability, either civil or criminal, which shall have been incurred under such provision, and each provision shall be treated and held as still remaining in force for the purposes of sustaining any and all proper actions, suits, proceedings, and prosecutions for the enforcement of the penalty, forfeiture, or liability, as well as for the purpose of sustaining any judgment, decree, or order which can or may be rendered, entered, or made in such actions, suits, proceedings, or prosecutions. Section 6. Penalty. The Penalty Provision of Section 1-4-1 EMC shall apply to each and every violation of this Ordinance. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 15th day of December, 2014. Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City's official newspaper on the 19th day of December, 2014. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City's official website beginning on the 17th day of December, 2014 for thirty (30) days. A Public Hearing was held on January 5, 2015. Read by title and passed on final reading on the 20th day of January, 2015. Published by title in the City's official newspaper as Ordinance No._, Series of 2015, on the 23rd day of January, 2015. Published by title on the City's official website beginning on the 21st day of January, 2015 for thirty (30) days. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after publication following final passage. Randy P. Penn, Mayor ATTEST: Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No._, Series of 2015. Loucrishia A. Ellis 6 • • • • COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Date: Agenda Item: Subject: January 20, 2015 11 c i Firefighter Safety and Disease Prevention Grant Initiated By: Staff Source: Fire Department Andrew Fox, Acting Assistant Chief of Support Services COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION The Firefighter Safety and Disease Prevention Grant (FSDPG) provides funding for a variety of programs and equipment needs within the State of Colorado. The FSDPG is a new grant program for 2015 and is administered by the Colorado Division of Fire Prevention and Control. The FSDPG provides an opportunity to address the Vision of the City of Englewood and Englewood Fire Department that includes: • Promoting and ensuring a high quality of life • Proactively facilitating a safe environment of opportunity through the delivery of reliable, affordable and flexible services • By responding to and mitigating emergencies in a timely, efficient and professional manner • By being prepared for any situation that requires the serv ices of an all-hazard fire department • RECOMMENDED ACTION • Staff recommends C o uncil approve a resolution authorizing a FSDPG application to the Colorado Division of Fire Prevention and Control for the purchase of Thermal lmager Cameras (Tl Cs) to replace two aging Tl Cs that are at the end of their useful life . The acquisition of Tl Cs will enable us to update and standardize TICs as part of our essential equipment inventory on all front-line fire engines . BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED The Englewood Fire Department is a progressive department and adopted the use of Thermal lmager Cameras early in the development of this te c hnology over 11 years ago . The cameras are useful in many situations and the technology can be a life saver in structure fires . TICs are used to locate victims in a zero- visibility smoke filled room. Tl Cs are also used to pinpoint the location of fires from the outside of a building prior to entry. TICs can display temperatures in a structure fire to help predict life-threatening conditions prior to occurrence, thereby saving victims ' and firefighters' lives . Our current Tl Cs have reached the end of their useful lives . They are 11 +years old. In 2014 we received a repair estimate for one of our current TICs and found the cost of repair was similar to the cost of a new TIC. We purchased one new TIC in 2014 to replace an inoperable one. The new TIC is more compact and has more capabilities than the 11 year old TIC it replaced . FINANCIAL IMPACT The FSDPG is a 100% grant with no required match. This means the City would not be required to provide any funds for the project. An estimate from our vendor for $12,838.00 is attached. This is for 2 new FUR KSO Thermal lmagers and truck charging/carrying stations . Submitting this grant application does not commit the City to accepting the funds should the grant be awarded. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Resolution • • • • • • RESOLUTION NO. SERIES OF 2015 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION FOR A FIREFIGHTER SAFETY AND DISEASE PREVENTION GRANT (FSDPG) AW ARD TO THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO WHEREAS, the FSDPG is a new grant program for 2015 which provides funding for a variety of programs and is administered by the Colorado Division of Fire Prevention and Control ; and WHEREAS , two of the Thermal Imager Cameras (TICs) currently in use by the Fire Department were acquired approximately 11 years ago and are now at the end of their useful life; and WHEREAS, the cameras are useful in many situations and the technology can be a life saver in structure fires. TICs are used to locate victims in a zero-visibility smoke filled room. TICs are also used to pinpoint the location of fires from the outside of a building prior to entry; and WHEREAS , the Englewood Fire Department desires to submit an application to Colorado Division of Fire Prevention and Control for funding to purchase these cameras; and WHEREAS , the FSDP Grant is a 100% grant with no required match; and WHEREAS , this Grant uses federal funding; and WHEREAS, Fire will bring back an IGA if approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes the Englewood Fire Department to submit an application for the Firefighter Safety and Disease Prevention Grant to purchase two Thermal Imager Cameras (TICs), attached hereto as Exhibit A. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 20th day of January, 2015 . ATTEST : Randy P . Penn, Mayor Loucrishia A. Ellis , City Clerk I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk for the City of Englewood, Colorado , hereby certify the above is a true copy of Resolution No. __ , Series of 2015 . Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk co1oraao .t'1rengnter ~atety ana u1sease .t'revenuon lirant .t'rogram Appllcattons Must be ... Page I of 7 Colorado Firefighter Safety and Disease Prevention Grant Program Applications Must be Completed by 5:00 PM on Friday, January 30, 2015. Plcilse use the following form to fill out your org;inization·s application for funding under the Color.:ido Firefighter Safety ilnd DiscilSC Prevention Grant (CFSDPG) Program. The CFSDPG steering committee is made up of representatives from the Colorado State Fire Chiefs Association, The Governor's Fire Service Training and Certification Advisory Board , and the Colorado State Firefighters Association. TI1c i:ommittee has determined thnt due to the inherent d ifferent needs among orgilnizations, priority ranking of High, Ml>dium and Low will be assigned . Ycilr one funding \~ill be prima rily focu sed on ensuring all Colorado firefighters have basic, silfe and NFPA complinnt bunker gcnr nnd SCBA available for their use. The following items nre considered to be the highest priority: NOTE : ONCE SUBMITTED, APPLICANTS WILL NOT BE ABLE TO REVISE THEIR APPLICATIONS . Priority 1 (High) SCBA -*Highest Priority SCBA Spare Bottles Bunker Gear Ensemble {Boots , Helmet Gloves) -•Highest Priority Wildland Gear Compressor and Cascade Air Trailer (Regional Application Package) FFJ/FFll/Fire Instructor Training Programs Extractor Air Monitoring Exhaust Removal Systems Physicals (NFPA 1582) Baseline w/ Vaccinations Other Safety Equipment and or Programs not Identified above but required for the safety and well-being of firefighters Priority 2 (Medium) Water/Ice Rescue Equipment (PFDs, Helmets, Training,) Thermal Imaging Cameras EMR Training Extrication Equipment Priority 3 (Low) All other firefighting equipment Exclusions No Motorized Vehicles No Communication Equipment https://adobefonnscentral.com/?f=8EDvQvhFzm9Rqo6uLbULEA 1/8/2015 • • t: x H I B I T A • · cotoraao l'iretJghter :Satety and Uisease Prevention Urant Program Applications Must be ... Page 2 of 7 • • • Contact Information Full Legal * !City of Englewood Fire Department Organization Name Street Address* 13615 S. Elati St. ...._ __________________ __. City• !Englewood State* _lc_o __ Zip Code* ~!so_1_1_0 _______ _. Organ izn ti on lhttp://www.englewoodgov.org/inside-city-hall/city-departments/ tire I Website Organization Chief I" ._IA_n_dr_e\_v_M_a_rs_h ______________ __. Executive Director Title* !Fire Chief Phone Number* 1303-762-2481 Cell Phone* 1303-929-6410 I E-Mail Address* lamarsh@englewoodgo! Contact Person l._A_nd_r_e,._v_Fo_x _______________ __. (if different) Title !Battalion Chief Phone Number !303-762-2470 Organization Infoimation Cell Phone 1303-748-8286 I E-Mail Address lafox@englewoodgov.ci Department Type• I career vi Total# of Career FF* ...._157 _ ___, Total# of All Staff 159 I Total# of Volunteer• E] FDID #* 1000545 FF Size of Jurisdiction • l._6._7_5 __ _.. Number ofl ,_3 _______ _, (Square miles) Stations Population Served ~IJ_l 7_2_7 ____________ __, 2011 Annual Call Volume and Type Please provide information regarding the total number of calls your agency responded to for each of the categories listed below. Total Calls (4337 Structure Fires [19 Vehicle Fires [s _ ___J Bmsh/Wildland Fires [16 . ~: ! Auto Accidents lt52 ] https://adobeformscentral.com/?f=8EDvQvhFzrn9Rqo6uLbULEA 1 /8/2015 Colorado .l'iretighter Satety and Disease Prevention Grant Program Applications Must be ... Page 3 of 7 Auto Accidents lo Requiring Extrication Hazardous Materials jtos Responses EMS Calls 12970 Technical Rescue 0 (Water/Ice/ High and Low Angle) Other (False Alann, @n Good Intent, Service Calls) 2012 Annual Call Volume and Type Please provide infonnation regarding the total number of calls your agency responded to for each of the categories listed below. Total Calls 14641 Structure Fires 121 : Vehicle Fires 11~ I Brush/Wildland Fires 110 : : :: l Auto Accidents 1200 Auto Accidents 0 Requiring Extrication Hazardous Materials !84 Responses EMS Calls 13160 Technical Rescue (Water/Ice/ High and Low Angle) Other (False Alann, [ooo Good Intent, Service Calls) 2013 Annual Cal1 Volume and Type Please provide information regarding the total number of calls your agency responded to for each of the categories listed below. Total Calls 146 w _______ I Structure Fires 11s =i Vehicle Fires 19 I Brush/Wildland Fires 16 https://adobefonnscentral.com/?f=8EDvQvhFzm9Rqo6uLbULEA 1/8/2015 • • • · coJorado t-iret1ghter :Satety and Uisease Prevention Urant Program Applications Must be ... Page 4of7 • • • Auto Accidents J186 Auto Accidents 0 Requiring Extrication Hazardous Materials 1117 Responses EMS Calls 13050 Technical Rescue 0 (Water/lee/ High and Low Angle) Other (False Alann, !!085 Good Intent, Service Calls) 2012 Budgetary Information Please provide the dollar amount in }our budget for each heading listed below: Total Budget ._IS-'7,-.35_8 .... ,3_8_8 ___________ ___, Total for Salaries and l$6,353,0IO .__.~----------------Bene fits to Include Pension Contributions Total for Training ~[$2_9~,8_0_3 ____________ _ Total for Other ._ls_78_9_,7_4_o ____________ __. Operating Expenses Total for Capital ._IS_t 8_5.....,,8_3_5 ____________ __, Expenditures 2013 Budgetary Information Please provide the dollar amount in your budget for each heading listed below: Total Budget "'"IS-'7,'-23_6.,;.,3_6_5 ___________ _. Total for Salaries and ._l$6_.,_43_2_,9_9_8 ____________ __. Benefits to Include Pension Contributions Total for Training ! ._$2_2...,,8_2_4 _______ ~------ Total for Total for ._j$7_1_9-'-,3_4_8 ____________ __, Other Operating Expenses Total for Capit.al ._@6_1...;..,1_9_5~. _____________ _. Expenditures 2014 Budgetary Information Please provide the dollar amount in your budget for each heading listed below: https://adobeformscentral.com/?f=8EDvQvhFzm9Rqo6uLbULEA 1/8/2015 cotoraao rirengnter ::satety anct U1sease Prevention Urant Program Applications Must be ... Page 5 of 7 Total Budget J$7,506,741 ,__------~~~~~---------'· Total for Salaries and !._$6_.,_59_2...,.6_0_8 ____________ __, Benefits to Include Pension Contributions Total forTraining .... [$_39 ......... 6_6_8 _____________ _.. Total for Total for ._[$_80_5_,5_0_8 ____________ __, Other Operating Expenses Total for Capitol Expenditures j$68,957 he City of Englewood is an urban, full-service Brief Description of Organization ommunity covering 6.75 square miles which A orders the city of Denver Colorado on the south ide. The city is located near the intersection of wo state highways, the South Platte River, and is V Number, type and * scat belted riding position of all apparatus; (i.e. 2 Pumpers -4 riding positions each) 2 -Engines , 4 riding positions each I -65' Squrt Engine, 4 riding positions 2 -Reserve Engines, 4 riding positions each 2 -Medic Apparatus (ambulance), 2 riding bositions each I -I Reserve Medic Apparatus, 2 riding positions Proposal Request 1 Program Project lthennal lmager Cameras (2) Name v Describe how this request will effect day-to-day operations, and ho\\' often will the equipment be used. he use of Thennal Imaging Cameras (TICs) in the Fire Service 0 Total Program "' Budget Requested Grant Amount Locally Provided Match (Note: No match is required.) as progressed from a luxury to a necessity in the last decade . A ICs are an integral piece of equipment when responding to mergencies and tire departments are discovering more uses for hem on a regular basis. Their most important role is the search or victims and fire in structure fires. The TICs ability to see hrough smoke has greatly improved the tirefighter's ability to earch the interior of buildings and find victims quicker than ver before. TICs also give responding firefighters the ab ility to ocate fire in a structure by "seeing" through interior and exterior 'V . . . ~12 .838.00 I 1$12 ,838 .00 J 0 https://adobefonnscentral.com/?f=8EDvQvhFzm9Rqo6uLbULEA 1/8/2015 • • • · cotoraao t irengnter ~atety ano u1sease t'revent1on urant Program Applications Must be ... Page 6 of 7 • • • Type of Equipment I Other 3 Request ~--~------' jThermal lmager Camera I Quantity of ._2 _______________ __. Requested Units. Price Per Unit .... ls ..... 6._4_19_.o_o ____________ _, Proposal Request 2 Program Project l.._N_IA ____________________ ~ Name Describe how this /A request will effect da)·-to-day operations, and how often will the equipment be used. Total Program Budge t Requested Grant Amount Locally Provided Match (Note: No match is required.) Type of Equipment Request Quantity of Requested Units . Price Per Unit. Please describe what unsuccessful attempts have been made in the past to secure funding for this project (i.e. Applied for an AFG Grant, limited local funding) v nglewood Fire Department has 3 major apparatus. 2 engines nd a Tele-Squrt. We cany a thermal imager camera on each of " hese apparatus. We currently have 2 Scott Eagle lmager 160s nd a FLIR KSO. The FLIR replaced a broken Scott lmager. Both of our current Scott Eagle lmagers are 11 +years old. The 'V . . . Please indicate percentage (%)of annual operating budget that your department receives from the following: https://adobeformscentral.com/?f=8EDvQvhFzm9Rqo6uLbULEA 1/8/2015 Lotoracto 1'1ret1ghter :satety anct U1sease Prevention Urant Program Applications Must be ... Page 7of7 Taxes ~ls_s _~----------~---' Fund Raising ._o _______________ __. Grants ,_o _______________ ___. Cash Funded 12 -----------~--------Programs /Fee for Service Other: Indicate type .... o _______________ ___. and percentage Please upload any ~ cracked screen .jpg attachment that may help justify your ~~ct File_J grant request (i .e . Picture of old equipment etc.). Submit ] By clicking the "Submit" button above. I acknowledge that I have read and agreed to the Terms of Use and the Adobe Priyacy Policy . Report Abuse j Terms of Use https://adobeformscentral.com/?f=8EDvQvhFzm9Rqo6uLbULEA 87KB i Powered by Adobe FonnsCentral 1/8/2015 • • • • • Narratives included in the FSDPG Application that did not print completely with Grant Brief Description of Organization: The City of Englewood is an urban, full-service community covering 6.75 square miles that borders the City of Denver Colorado on the south. The City is located near the intersection of two state highways adjacent to the South Platte River. The city has a population of 32,000 with a significantly higher daytime population due to several large employers. The City is home to Swedish Health One -a regional level 1 trauma center, and Craig Hospital , a world recognized spinal rehabilitation hospital. The City occupancies include a mix of light industry, commercial and residential properties. Heavy rail lines run through the city at a rate of 15 trains per day . The Denver Regional Transportation District's Southwest Corridor Light Rail Line also runs through the City. Two Light Rail Stations are located in the City of Englewood. The Southwest Corridor Line transports people between southwestern suburbs and Downtown Denver with an average estimated ridership of22,000 people per week. Approximately 200 ,000 vehicles travel the City 's two major highways each day. The City contains four buildings often stories or more , and twenty-eight of four or more stories. The Englewood Fire Department [EFD] is a full-service urban career department serving the citizens, work force, and visitors of the city of Englewood. The Fire Department provides the following services : • Fire suppression I investigations • ALS-level EMS treatment and transport • Hazardous Materials response I mitigation •Technical Rescue -confined space I trench I rope • Code Enforcement -IFC I IBC code enforcement • Fire Prevention & Safety Education programs The Fire Department is an active member in the Arapahoe/Douglas County Regional Hazardous Materials Response Team, Wildland Fire Team and the Regional Trench Rescue Response Team. The department cooperates in automatic aid and mutual aid agreements with its surrounding jurisdictions. Additionally, the department maintains a local training center in cooperation with Littleton Fire Rescue. The Fire Department consists of three stations , 51 line personnel and eight administrative staff. The department staffs three engine companies , one being a 65 ' Tele-Squirt, and two ALS medic units . The department also houses a haz mat response unit, a mobile air/light trailer, and a utility/support response vehicle. Shift personnel work a modified Berkeley schedule and average 4 ,600 responses per year, or over 12 calls per day. Administrative staffing includes the Fire Page 1of3 Chief, Deputy Chief of Operations, Assistant Chief of Support Services, Fire Marshal, Assistant • Fire Marshal, Training Bureau Chief, EMS Bureau Chief, and an Executive Assistant. Financial Narrative In recent years, the City of Englewood has experienced an economic recession. Sales tax revenues have been flat or slightly decreased as expenses have steadily increased. As recently as 2011 City salaries were frozen and all City employees were furloughed four work-days. In 2012, while employee costs rose slightly, the City was forced to reduce its budgeted operating fund 2% below the initially approved amount. In 2013, early promising increases in revenue diminished significantly during April and May. In June, the City anticipated a shortfall of approximately $1 million by year 's end. All departments were directed to again reduce budgets by 2%. Increased personnel costs, which comprise 91 % of the fire department's operating budget, have continued to rise each year as revenues have remained static. The city anticipates a revenue vs . expenditure differential of between $1.5 and $2 million by the end of 2014. Capital expenditures for infrastructure, such as what this grant seeks to provide, are virtually impossible to obtain in the current economic environment. The fire department is in needs to replace its aging Thermal Imager Cameras. This was not an approved budget item for 2015. The maintenance, repair and/or replacement of the aging Thermal Imager Cameras will not be possible without this grant, • as there are virtually no capital items in the 2015 approved budget for the fire department. Detail on Current Equipment to be Replaced: Englewood Fire Department has three major apparatus: two engines and a Tele-Squirt. We deploy a thermal imager camera on each of these apparatus . We currently have 2 Scott Eagle Imager 160s and a FLIR K50. The FLIR replaced a broken Scott Imager . Both of our current Scott Eagle Imagers are 11 + years old. The estimate we received to repair our older Scott Imager was more than it cost to purchase a new K50 . We have been satisfied with the Scott Thermal Imagers but the new FLIR K50 is a smaller, lighter unit with all the capabilities we need at a lower price. Our other two Scott Imagers are reaching the end of their useful life with one having a cracked screen that is hard to justify repairing due to the high expense. We would like to replace our two older Scott Imagers with new FLIR K50s to have all three apparatus outfitted with the same standardized equipment. The Englewood Fire Department and the City of Englewood are unable to address most of the capital needs in the 2015 budget year. There is an urgent need to replace the Thermal Imagers on the Fire Apparatus but this capital improvement is not an approved 2015 budget item. Page 2of3 • • • • How the Requested Equipment will be used: I The use of Thermal Imaging Cameras (TICs) in the Fire Service has progressed from a costly new technology to a more affordable necessity in the last decade. TI Cs are an integral piece of equipment 'rhen responding to emergencies, and fire departments are discovering more uses for them on a regular basis. Their most important role is in searching for victims and locating heat sources in structure fires. The TICs ability to "see" through smoke has greatly improved the firefighter's ability to search the interior of buildings and find victims quicker than ever before. TICs also give responding firefighters the ability to locate fire in a structure by "seeing" through interior and exterior walls. Without any visible evidence from the exterior, TICs can determine what floor and/or area of a structure is involved in fire prior to entry. When firefighters enter a building, the TIC is used to specifically locate the fire so it can be extinguished as quickly as possible. During overhaul, TI Cs are especially useful in searching for hidden fires and hotspots. TI Cs are also very useful in determining interior temperatures while fighting fires. Evaluating ceiling temperatures is useful in predicting flashover potential. With a TIC, it is possible for firefighters to evaluate ceiling temperatures and exit a building prior to the deadly occurrence of a flashover. The Thermal Imaging Camera is a standard piece of equipment for all of our major fire apparatus and considered a necessary tool to effectively search for victims and fight fires. The use of TI Cs in the fire service has decreased fire losses and saved lives . Page 3 of 3 Apparatus Eq u Ip m en t ctr Se rv Ice, Inc. 'llHELE.N~ 969 West 2100 South Salt Lake, UT 84119 801-886-0600 3615 S Elati St Englewood, CO 80110 • m NFPA" Ship To if approved : 2.00 THERMAL IMAGING CAMERA 320 x 240 MICROBOLOMETER 2.00 OPTIONAL TRUCK CHARGING/CARRY STATION 1.00 D-Inbound Freight Charge ...,.-:-=;GAMBER ~-·JOHNSON ··-~Well Connectedr"' Phone# 800-420-1363 Fax# 801-886-0615 www.apparatus-es.com 5,494.50 10,989.00 874.50 1,749 .00 100 .00 100.00 Subtotal $12,838.00 Sales Tax (7.05%) $0.00 Total $12,838.00 Questions? Email back to: COUNCIL COMMUNICATION ' • ate Agenda Item Subject anuary 20, 2015 Resolution Supporting the City's Arapahoe 11 c ii County Open Space Grant Application for Park Gateway Enhancements Phase I Initiated By Staff Source Department of Parks and Recreation Jerrell Black, Director of Parks and Recreation Dave Lee , Open Space Manager COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION Goal: A City that provides di v erse cultural, recreational and entertainment opportunities No previous Council action has been taken on this issue . RECOMMENDED ACTION Recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Department to approve the resolution supporting the City's grant application to Arapahoe C o unty Open Space for Park Gateway Enhancements Phase I. BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED The Parks Gateway Enhancements dem o nstrate a much overdue need to replace 1 7 signs that are currently comprised of 50 year old hand made park identification signs with a more modern, updated design for park • ntification signage with additional landscaping surrounding th e park signs. The Community believes these park signs are the gateway into each of our neighborhood parks and are critical to identifying each of Englewood 's parks. Replacement of the park ID signs will improve the image of the City of Englewood. The goal is to replace all current park ID signs in 2 phases and update the image of our city, which is a major goal for city council. This grant request is for Phase 1 only. A second grant application will follow in 2016 to fund construction of the remaining gateway enhancements. FINANCIAL IMPACT The City's Arapahoe County Open Space grant application will request $200, 100 in grant funds with a required City cash match of $83,300 fr o m Arapahoe County Shareback Funds . Shareback funds ha v e been budgeted for this project in the 2015 Open Space Fund. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Resolution • • • • • • RESOLUTION NO . SERIES OF 2015 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CITY'S ARAPAHOE COUNTY OPEN SPACE GRANT APPLICATION FOR PARK GATEWAY ENHANCEMENTS PHASE I WHEREAS, the Parks Gateway Enhancements Project highlights a much overdue need to replace seventeen signs that are currently comprised of 50 year old hand made park identification signs with a more modem, updated design for park identification signage with additional landscaping surrounding the park signs; and WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation staff believe these park ID signs are the gateway into each of our neighborhood parks and are critical to identifying each of Englewood's parks and will improve the image of the City of Englewood; and WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended the Tacito Design for this project at the May 9th, 2002 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission again recommended the design at the October 11th, 2012, November 15th, 2012 and January 10th, 2013 meetings; and WHEREAS, there are no federal funds being used for the Park Gateway Enhancements Phase 1 project; and WHEREAS, the City's Arapahoe County Open Space grant application will request $200,100 in grant funds with a required City cash match of $83,300. Englewood shareback funds have been budgeted; and WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation will bring back an IGA if approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes the application for an Arapahoe County Open Space Grant for Park Gateway Enhancement attached hereto as Exhibit A. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 20th day of January, 2015. ATTEST: Randy P. Penn, Mayor Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk for the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify the above is a true copy of Resolution No. __ , Series of 2015. Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk • • • • • ARAPAHOE COUNTY COLORADO'S FIRST 2015 Standard Grant Grant Proposal A apahoe County Open Space City of Englewood Par s and Recreation Department • En lewood arks Gatewa Enhancements Phase I • E x H I B I T A TABLE OF CONTENTS Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase I) PART A-Application Summary Form PART B-Minimum Qualifications and Eligibility Form PART C-Application Checklist PART D-Project Timeline PART E-Project Budget PART F-Project Details PART G-Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Lo~g-te_rm C::ommitment Letter 3 . Evidence of Property Ownership 4. Support Letter~ 5. Documentation of opposition and responses 6. Evidence of Commitment from funding partners 7. Photos 8. Site M?PS 9. GIS shapefile 10. Other • Council Communication 1999 • Request for Proposal-City Entryway Monumentation • Suggested Scope of Work-City of Englewood Signage Projects-1999 • Tacito Design-Design Intent Statement • Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-May 2002 • Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-October 2012 • Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-November 2012 • Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-January 2013 • Tacito Design-Total Design Fee Contract Amount • PKM Design Group-Park Signage Graphics Invoice Page 1 Page 3 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 12 P?ge 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 57 Page 62 Page 6~ Page 64 Pa_ge 76 Page 79 Page~O Page80 Page81 Page 82 Page84 Page 85 Page 87 Page 89 Page91 Page 93 Page94 • • • • • • 2015 Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Application Part A-Application Summary Form Grant Category (check one): X Standard 0 Small This application will be scor :don a 100-point scale by the evaluation committee and must Score a minimum of 75 poir ts. Applicant Information Name: City of Englewood Address: 1155 West Oxford Avenue, Englewood, CO 80110 Primary Contact: Dave Lee I Title: Open Space Manager Telephone: 303-762-2687 Email: dlee@englewoodgm .org Primary Partner Information (Additional partners she uld be discussed in Part F: Project Details, Question 13 of the application.) Name: No Additional Partn "rs Address: Contact: ,.Thie:. -Telephone: ' Email: "' ' _., ' ' -·1; I . Partner Responsibilities: -. · . Project Information Grant Category: Standard brant Project Type: Site Improvement Project Project Title: Englewood P irks Gateway Enhan_cements_ {Phase I} Address: Belleview Park SC 01 S. -Inca St. Baker Park 22.oo ·w. Wesley Ave. Emerson Park 2929 S. Emerson St. Bates-Logan P~rk 2938 S. Logan St. Romans Park 1700 E. Floyd Ave . Cushing Park 700 W. Dartmouth Ave. M lier Field 3600 S. Elati St. Jason Park 4299 S. Jason St. Rotolo Park 4400 S. Huron St. Centenn al Park 4630 S. Decatur St. Englewood, CO 80110 City or Unincorporated Ar< pa hoe County: Englewood GPS Coordinates: Belleview Park -39°37'27.36"N 104°59'57.93"W, Baker Park -39°40'23 .83"N 10S 0 00'49.18"W, Emersor Park -39°39'48.61"N 104°58'37.17"W, Bates-Logan Park - 39°39'50.35"N 104°58'52.i::l.6"W, Romans Park -39°39'23.89"N 104°58'03.70"W, Cushing Park - 39°39'36.90"N 104°59'46.95"W, Miller Field -39°39'06.46"N 104°59'36.28"W, Jason Park - 39°38'23.83"N 104°59'59.30"W, Rotolo Park -39°38'09.59"N 104°59'50.52"W, Centennial Park -39°37'53.60"N 105°01'2) .26"W Grant Request: $200,100 Cash Match Total: $83,300 Total Project Amount: $2 B,400 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 1 of94 I Percentage of Total Project: 29% Brief Project Summary (400 words or less): project description, components, need, goal, beneficiary, planning, community input, results The Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase I) demonstrate a much overdue need to replace 17 signs that are currently comprised of SO year old hand made park identification signs with a more modern, updated design for park identification signage with additional landscaping surrounding the park signs. The community believes these park ID signs are the gateway into each of our neighborhood parks and are critical to identifying each of Englewood's parks. Replacement of the park ID signs will improve the image of the City of Englewood. The goal is to replace all current park ID signs in 2 phases and update the image of our City, which is a major goal for City Council. Signage design was brought through a planning and selection process approved by the Englewood Parks & Recreation Commission and City Council. Phase II for th is project will consist of replacing 8 park identification signs in smaller parks and greenbelts and providing for landscaping around the identification signs in 2016. The City of Englewood anticipates submitting a grant request for this phase as well. 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 2 of 94 • • • • • • Part B -Minimum Qual fication and Eligibility Form Certify the below minimum ualifications and eligibility criteria: Applicant Name: City of Eng ewood Application Category and T pe: Standard Grant -Site Improvement Project Project Name: Englewood P rks Gateway Enhancements Briefly answer the followin qualification questions: 1. Is applicant in good tanding with Arapahoe County Open Space? Discuss past performance (past fi e years); discuss all on-going Arapahoe County Open Space Grants, and the number an types of grants for which your agency is applying in this cycle. The City of Englewo d is in good standing with Arapahoe County Open Space. Over the past 5 years, Engle ood has received 6 grants. All grants have been completed within the allotted time fra e. The one exception is the River Run grant, which expanded in project scope duet a major project sponsored by Urban Drainage and Flood Control and South Platte W rking Group. The project encompasses an area from Union Avenue and the South Platt River to Oxford ,Avenue and the South Platte River. Englewood current! has 2 on ,,going g~ants '(Hdsanna Synthetic Turf Field and Duncan Park Redevelopme t). Both grants are in the firial stpges of completion with final reports pending . Englewood will app y for 2 standard grants this cycle. The grants are for River Run Trailhead (Construe ion Project) Improvements and Park Gateway Enhancements (Site Improvement) 2. Discuss project alig ment with the Arapahoe County Open Space Master Plan; local adopted Master Pl n; or other approved planning documents. The Open Space M ster Plan provides a 100-year vision, 25-year master plan and 5-year action plan for impl menting the purpose and goals of the program. The vision states that the County wil be forward thinking, understand and embrace the open space, park and trail needs of c rrent residents, and define a harmonious relationship between people and nature n the County for future generations. The vision for the Program is summarized as: He lthy Lands, Healthy Communities, and Healthy People. The Park Gateway nhancements project compliments the mission of the Arapahoe County Open Spac Plan. • Acquire, conse ve and protect open space -The Park Gateway Enhancements project will con inue to identify and protect Englewood Parks and open spaces . 2015 Standard/Small Grant pplication Page 3of94 • Build county open space parks and trails -With updated and proper Park Gateway • Enhancements Englewood Parks will attract new users and help maintain a healthy community. • Cooperative partnership work -This project allows the continued partnership between the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County Open Space and area groups such as Englewood Unleashed and Pirate Youth Sports to strengthen the Englewood Park system. • Leverage funding for open space, parks and trails-The Park Gateway Enhancements project will leverage funding sources from ACOS Grant Funds and Shareback Funds . 3. Describe how this project addresses specific objectives in the County Open Space Resolution #030381/#110637. Document is pasted on the Open Space Grant Program page of the County Website. The Park Gateway Enhancements project specifically addresses the following objectives of the County Open Space Resolution #030381/#110637. • Preserve urban and rural open space and natural areas -Proper identification and wayfindlng improves the usage .of.~a an open spaces. This project will preserve the Englewood Park syste ~~h1 d.ated P\fk signage and encourage increased use through the attractiveJ'liSig· o a ~ eslCf en · of Arapahoe County. • Provide, maintain and imP.fove T!:J! gli~or~dd pt rks, open space, sports fields, picnic facilities and biking, walki A~n ~rlrlllti-use •. fail . -The Park Gateway Enhancements project will improve the o.Je f all 1 ge f the P. rk system. Gateway signage is rather • like a first impression. By re~l &c (1g o ltif~ted Ysignage with new designs will not only unify the identity of the entire ~k ·syst~but signify the quality of our parks. Acknowledge the minimum quallflcatlon-co mjl) ren~s11sted below.· All components are required to meet minimum qualifications: ./ All items on the enclosed application checklist are included In the application ./ All questions are answered in Part F and all supporting documents are attached in Part G ./ All budget forms are attached, completed and signed by the agency's highest authority ./ Application format and document order follow Instructions ./ Above eligibility and qualification questions are answered and meet Arapahoe County Open Space eligibility requirements ./ All required forms are signed by agency's highest authority ./ Minimum cash match requirement met (29% of total project) Applicant certifies that all of the above items are included in the application and that all information submitted is true to the best of their knowledge. Authorized Signature:~ (must be signed by hlg --;;ut~ 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 4 of94 Date: _f:....._.S_-..;;..../.S __ _ • • • • Project Title: En lewood Park Gatewa Enhancements Phase I Part B -Minimum Qualif cation and Eligibility Form (cont'd) For Arapahoe County Us Only: Initial Review Date (pre-quali ication): ----------------- • Minimum Qualificatio s Met (yes/no)? • Past Performance and Status: eligible for funding, probationary status necessary (e.g. special award terms o funding conditions), or ineligible: • Application Contents, ormatting and Overall Presentation: Grant Program Administrator Signature:_...;,__"--"--;;..._----------- • Minimum Score Met fter Evaluation: • Final Ranking and Rec mmendation After Evaluation: • Comments: Grant Program Administrator Signature:---------------- 2015 Standard/Small Grant App ication Page 5 of94 Part c-Applicatf on Checklist • Use the application checklist to verify that all of the required documents are included In this application in the order listed below. All sections are required to meet minimum qualifications • ./ Part A -Application' Summary Form ./ Part B -Minimum Qualifications and Eligibility Form (must be signed) ./ Part C -Application Checklist (must be signed) ./ Part D -Project Timeline ./ Part E -Project Budget Narrative and Forms (all forms must be completely filled out and signed) ./ Part F -Project Details (narrative response to project questions) ./ Part G -Attachments (identify each attachment with the table of contents cover page and list attachments in the following order) 1. Evidence of support from highest authority (official letter or resolution)- including commitment to complete the project; statement that matching funds are secured; and certification that the project will be open to the public or serve a public purpose upon completion 2. Evidence of commitment ~Ion~ ,~lntenance (official letter or resolution) 3. Evidence of property o~;rshm' e ct ace s (legal documentation) 4. Evidence of communit 'IA pport1( tt!rs f ~~port-maximum of 5) 5. Documentation of op~sit oh n •· s 'lil ' e ff if applicable) 6. Evidence of commitm l lJ ding ~it rs (cash match/in-kind match support letters) \ (/J. • 7. Photos (pre-submittal)_.~ 8 . Site maps (project location maps) 9. GIS shapefile, if applicable (iraclude on compact disc) 10. Other (clearly title: aGquisition dooumentation ,tfapplicable, or other supporting documents) Applicant certifies that all of the above items are included in the application, in the order listed above, and that all information submitted is true to the best of their knowledge. Authorized Signature: , - (must be signed by hlg /jft' authority in agency) 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 6 of 94 Date: /-$""-/.C • . . • Part D -Project Time line (S points) Use the below project tin heline sample as a guide to complete your proposed project timeline. Project timeline must be '"ealistic to receive full points. Task Jun Jul 'ep Oct Nov Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 2015 2015 2p15 2015 2015 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 Grant Notification IGASigned Solicitation of Vendors Project Bid Award(s) Upper Sign Manufacture Ground/Site Prep Concrete Base Installation Upper Sign ' Installation ' \ Landscaping '• ' " ~- Final Report l ; • ' • 2015 Standard/Small Grant ti.pplication Page 7of94 Part E -Project Budget Narrative and Forms (10 points) Budget Narrative: Provide a clear and concise budget narrative for this project (250 words or less). The Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase I) project will construct 17 park identification signs (8 large, 9 small signs) and include landscaping around each sign. Large sign fabrication is estimated to cost $8,850 each sign, concrete base installation is estimated to cost $7,000 per sign and sign installation in the field is estimated to cost $1,218 per sign . Small sign fabrication is estimated to cost $5,930 per sign, concrete base installation is estimated at $6,390 per sign and sign installation in the field is estimated at $1,218 per sign. Landscaping surrounding the signs is estimated to cost $490 per sign. Budget Forms: All project budget forms must be completely filled out following the rules and regulations set forth in the application guidelines and instructions. Each budget form must be signed by the highest authority in your agency and included in this section of the application. The following project budget forms are attached and required to be complete and included in the application to meet minimum qualifications : • Summary Budget Form: The summary budget form must be fully completed and successfully match up with the budget narrative, the grant budget form, the match budget form and the selection criteria questions. \ • • Grant Budget Form: The grant budget form must qe completed with sufficient detail to • be accepted . Please reference the sample budge~ for the expected level of detail. Budget items are to be broken down into categories, and then broken down into the detailed use of funds within each category by line item and cost . • Match Budget Form: The match budget form must be completed with sufficient detail to be accepted. Please reference the sample budget for the expected level of detail. Budget items are to be broken down into categories, and then broken down into the detailed use of funds within each category by line item and cost. The match budget form includes cash match and in-kind match. Only cash match counts toward the percentage of match required . The cash match requirement is 25% of the total project amount for Standard Grants and 10% of the total project cost for Small Grants. In-kind match is significant and shows partnership and community support for the project. Administrative costs to prepare the grant application are not an eligible expense . 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 8 of 94 • t'an: t -::»ummary Budget Form Sources of Funds Date .Secured· Arapahoe County Open Space 15-Jun Applicant match 15-Jan Parks General Fund 2-Jul ACOS Shareback 14-Dec Applicant: City of Englewood ReqUlrements:· r . . t I Slgnature:.-1\--<'f~ cu,.., • Date: ·Total Pro}ect'Amount: 1n 1k1nd Match: Total Pro}ed w/oui llflilnd: cash Match ~rm~Requlred: Requlied Qfs,li Milttli'Amount: . :PrtiJect eash 'Matdi 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 9of94 County Grant Request $200,100 t 1 1.; .......... ,_..__,_,,>o. ... __ ........ _;..;··-~··· ...... __ , • I 'I L---·····----···· .... . ' " .. . , J L___ __ l I i l .....•• $200,100 t .J Cash ·Match $66,700 $15,500 $1,100 Project Tltle1 Englewood Parks Gateway E In-Kind Match v-r: Name and Title: Dave Lee, Open Space Manager $'2831400:00 $0;00 · $283140Q~OO ;~!00% $70,850.00 ~ . •. r .. --~' '.$83 }3~~0o t MliilmumiNlit:~v..or"N . Total Project Funds $200,100 $66,700 $15,500 $1,100 2015 t"arc 1:.-uram tmaget Form/Use of Funds Category 'Detailed Use of Funds per Category Large Sign (8 signs) Sign fabrication Concrete sign base Sign installation Landscape Small Sign (9 signs) Sign fabrication Concrete sign base Sign installation Landscape Appllcantl City of Englewood ... -~~ Dlitr. $, 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 10 of 94 • Grant Request Amount 70,800 $70,800 56,000 $0 9,700 $0 3,000 $3,000 53,400 $53,400 57,500 $57,500 11,000 $11,000 4,400 $4,400 $200,100 Pro .. ct Tltle: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancem Nam• and Tltle: Dave Lee, Open Space Manage • • Part E-Match Budget Form/Cash and In-kind • - Category Detailed Use of Funds Category Sign design, color lasoprint, Signage Design Fee large color output and mountina Landscape design fees for Landscape Design Fee irrigated and non-irrigated areas Park Identification Signs Sign fabrication, Concrete sign base, Sign installation Landscape Applicant: City of Englewood •...-..,.: '!?ilif ~ 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 11of94 -- Source of Match Cash In-kind Total Amount Parks Genera Fund Budget 15,500 $15,500 ACOS Shareback 1,100 $1,100 ACOS 0 $0 Shareback A~U~ Share back 56,000 $56,000 /'\lJU~ 9,700 $9,700 Shareback ACOS 1,000 $1,000 Share back Total $83,300 $0 $83,300 Project Tltle: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements Name and Tltle: Dave Lee, Open Space Manager ' ' - Part F -Project Details (75 points) Applicants must respond to all of the following questions to meet minimum qualifications. This section is worth 75 points. Applicants must limit this section to 10 pages and answer all questions to meet minimum qualifications. If attachments/supporting documentation apply to a question answer please fully answer the question and reference the document in Part G. Please do not answer a question as "N/A". If a question is not applicable, please explain why it is not applicable to be considered for the full amount of points. Select the Grant Category: X Standard Grant: $50,100 -$300,000 funding opportunity, 25% of total project amount minimum cash match requirement 0 Small Grant: $100 -$50,000 funding opportunity, 10% of total project amount minimum cash match requirement Select the Project Type: Project Type/Project Details: The project categories for the standard and small grant applications are below: 0 Trail Project: Projects that are mostly ,trai,I construction or renovation/restoration, trail- related bridges, trail-related road cr9ssings, or trail ·~ead parking and shelters. • X Site Improvement Projects: Project~ for site improvement, restoration and repair/replacement including: natural re-vegetation/restoration, park improvements, • restoration, repair/replacement lfilay include playgrounds, shelters, sport fields, landscaping). This category may include interibr trail segments or connections, but the majority of the project should be site improvements other than trail. 0 Construction Project: Construction projects rnay include new park amenities such as playgrounds, shelters, sport fields, restrooms, and interior trails or connections. 0 Acquisition Project (standard grant only): Eligible projects involve fee simple acquisition of land for public open space, park or trails; acquisition of buffer land; acquisition of a conservation easement and/or acquisition of water rights. D Environmental Project/Cultural Education or Interpretation Project: Projects focused on environmental or cultural education/interpretation installations may include associated sign bases, panels, landscaping, benches and shelters. 0 Other Project: Other allowable project categories include: stream-related projects, wildlife habitat, and water quality. These projects should not fit into any of the other project categories. Please contact the County Grant Administrator for questions related to allowable projects. Selection Criteria Questions (75 points): 1. Describe the project goal, extent of scope and expected results . Be specific; discuss what the project will provide, quantities, size, project elements, useful life of project components, and deliverables. Discuss the current condition of the project site and what improvements or changes are being proposed and why. Provide detailed maps 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 12of94 • • • • and photos in Part G. escribe how the project will be designed, constructed and managed and how you will choose vendors, materials, systems, etc. Describe how this project improves acce sand connectivity to any existing trail network, natural resources, and/or com unity resources. If this is an educational project, discuss the long term educational utcomes expected as a result of this project and how the project connects people to ea h other, the natural environment and/or community resources. Complete the budget rm in Part E consistent with this narrative {15 points) Gateway enhancemen s include replacement of 50 year old hand -made park identification signs wi h updated, modern design park identification signage with additional landscapin surrounding the park signs. The community believes these park ID signs are the gatew y into each of our neighborhood parks and are critical to identifying each of En lewood's parks. Replacement of the park ID signs will improve the image of the City of E glewood. The goal is to replace all current park ID signs in 2 phases and update th image of our City, which is a major goal for City Council. Phase I will include the follow ng parks: Belleview, Baker, Emerson, Bates-Logan, Romans, Cushing, Miller, Jason Rotolo and Cent~nnial Parks. The Phase I scope for he project is to r~place 17 park ID signs in 10 different parks. This project also includes I ndscap,e, enhapcemen.tS'surrounding each identification sign. There are 2 sign desig sizes (:one large, <i>ne sm€1H). lhe large gateway signs (8) will be constructed in comm nity parl<s ahd the small signs (9) will be constructed in neighborhood parks and at secondary' entries to community parks. The large sign dimensions are appro imately 9 feet wide by 6 Yi feet tall. The small signs are approximately 6 feet ide by 4 Yi feet tall : Each sign is non-illuminated, aluminum construction on a cas concrete base with a 6 inch mow strip around the base. The paint for the aluminu is acrylic polyurethane graffiti resistant in "Federal Green", "warm white" and "b ushed aluminum" colors. Life expectancy for the project is estimated to be 20 y ars. The Gateway Enhanc ment project will be advertised for competitive sealed bid. Bid specifications will be eveloped and advertised on Rocky Mountain Bid Net. A vendor will be selected base on the price of their bid and experience constructing such a project. The Gateway Enhanc ment project will update and improve the overall image of Englewood Parks & creation and the City of Englewood. The project will also improve access and connectiv ty by more clearly and prominently identifying Englewood Parks to automotive, bicycle nd pedestrian traffic. 2. Describe the com mu ity/neighborhood and user groups the project will serve. Discuss the type of users (ch ldren, adults, seniors, families, sports leagues, youth groups, etc.) the project will serv and estimate the number of user groups annually that will benefit 2015 Standard/Small Grant A Page 13 of 94 from the project. How did you arrive at this estimate? Describe the service area for this project (how far will users travel to use the project site). (5 points) The Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements will serve the Englewood community, the surrounding neighborhoods and all park users from outside of Englewood. Englewood parks are visited by many families, adults, seniors, youth and adult sports leagues. The gateway enhancements will provide Englewood with a new branding image for our parks and clearer, more obvious identification for our parks. A recent citizen survey from the 2014 Community Livability Report Englewood, CO stated that 88% of Englewood's 31,676 citizens use our parks. Englewood parks are locally renowned and receive many visitors from around the metro area. 3. Describe any scenic, historic or cultural values associated with this project. Will they be preserved or restored? Describe specific natural resources at the site, including habitat and/or water. List predominant wildlife species and vegetation on site. Discuss impacts to these resources as a result of this project. If this is a conservation easement acquisition project, describe the conservation values and public benefits/value of the land, easement or water resource. (5 points) There are no scenic, historic or cultural valwes associated with the Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements. Thert~n park locations are comprised oftypical suburban park natural resources, habitat and wate~; The parks are all irrigated and contain the typical bluegrass turf and native/non-native tree species (cottonwood, oak, ash, linden, spruce, Austrian and ponderosa pine species) found along the Front Range. Belleview, Cushing and Centennial Parks respectively contain -a small stream, a pond and a lake. The habitat value of these parks would be categorized as low. Typical bird species include sparrows, robins, finch, geese, etc. Animal sp-ecies include fox, coyote, skunk, rabbit, etc. Impacts to the natural resources are considered to be extremely low. 4. Discuss the ownership and legal access to the proposed project site, including right of access without trespassing on adjacent property. Detail any third-party rights, easements or other encumbrances that exist. Provide supporting documentation proving ownership, legal access or permission from landowner and a site map in Part G. (3 points) The listed parcels of property: Belleview Park-5001 S. Inca St. Baker Park-2200 W. Wesley Ave. Emerson Park-2929 S. Emerson St. Bates-Logan Park-2938 S. Logan St. Romans Park-1700 E. Floyd Ave. Cushing Park-700 W. Dartmouth Ave. Miller Field-3600 S. Elati St. Jason Park-4299 S. Jason St. Rotolo Park-4400 S. Huron St. Centennial Park- 4630 S. Decatur St. are located in Englewood, Colorado. The City of Englewood is the sole owner of these parcels. Vehicle access to the locations will be provided by current public streets. No third party rights, easements or other encumbrances will affect this project. The City of Englewood owns all park property and is managed by the Parks and 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 14of94 • • • • • • Recreation Department Arapahoe County parcel search ownership verification is located Part G. 5. Describe long-term maintenance of the project site. Estimate the annual costs to maintain the site, how hose numbers were calculated, how you intend to fund maintenance and who s responsible for maintenance. Explain how maintaining this project site changes yo r agency maintenance budget. (Provide projected budget changes, detailed cost stimates, how you plan to accommodate these changes, and explain how you arrive at those numbers.) Provide a commitment letter from the management/mainten nee agency addressing long-term maintenance and include budgeting for funding aintenance in Part G. (7 points) The City of Englewood wns all park property and the Parks and Recreation Department will be responsible for he long-term maintenance of every park, all landscape enhancements and sig age for the project. The City of Englewood annually allocates funding in the Parks a d Recreation Department budget for personnel, commodities and capital for regular rep ir and maintenance for all park infrastructures, amenities and facilities. The 2015 Par s Division Mainten~nte Budget is $2,137,252. The Parks Department currently aintains approx.ir(iately 2SJ.J acres of parkland, open space and green space and the p rks gat.e,way ~i:ihan cie~ents are not estimated to increase the overall maintenance b dget fo.r many yea'rs due to the low maintenance cost materials : . .. used in the project (c ncrete <ind powder coated aluminum). Landscape designs were added with the goal o keeping maintenah~e c,;ost~ 1ow. The maintenance of the landscaping will also be absorbed int6 the -~xistirfg parks budget for 2015 as these areas do not result in a signi icant increase in area or plant material to manage. 6. Summarize planning orts to date artd investhients made prior to submitting a grant proposal. Discuss pre submittal meetings, dates and outcomes. Be detailed and include eligible pre-planning osts on the Match Budget Form in Part E. See application instructions for detail . Proof of pre-submittal planning expenses must be submitted as an attachment in Part G. All attachments should be clearly labeled on the Part G cover page. (5 points) Planning for the park ateway signage initially started in 1999. The City of Englewood was interested in str ngthening the community image and heightening awareness of Englewood. Tacito D sign Inc. was selected for design development of entry port monumentation, city district signage design and park gateway signage enhancements . An advisory com mitt e was formed to help guide the process and to communicate with their constituencies i the community. The advisory committee was comprised of policy - makers, local merch nts, residents and City staff. In early 2002, four p rk signage design concepts were developed at a cost of $15,500 (see Part E nd G) and in May 2002, Tacito Design met with the Englewood 2015 Standard/Small Grant Ap lication Page 15of94 Parks and Recreation Commission and selected a park signage design concept. In the • next number of years, the economy began to contract and Englewood went through a number of years of budget freezes and reductions. The project was put on hold due to a lack of funding resources. In 2013, the City was awarded a $250,000 grant from Arapahoe County for the redevelopment of Duncan Park. As part of that project, the new park gateway sign age enhancements were incorporated into the redevelopment of Duncan Park. Due to the success of this park redevelopment in the fall of 2014 and the input received from citizens and policy-makers, the City would like to move forward with updating and enhancing all park gateway signage. As part of the Gateway Enhancements project, options for landscape designs were drawn up by PKM Design Group at an expense of $1,100. (see Part E and G). 7. Is this project "shovel ready"? Provide evidence that this project will be completed within two years. Is design and engineering complete or is there still work to be done? List any permits that will need to be obtalnea for implementation of the project and existing status of obtaining those permits. (Federal 404, County or City Planning or Public Works, Storm Water Dr~inage, etc). noes th~ project necessitate a change in zoning? Itemize anticipated costs for permits, government fees and consultants. Detail costs in the correct Part E Budget Form. Correlate response with the Project Timeline in Part D. Project timeline must be realistic to receive full points for this question. If this is an acquisition project, list the due diligence items you already have available or will pursue (such as purchase agreement, preliminary title work, appraisal, environmental site assessment, survey, etc). Purchase agreement or option with seller and preliminary title work should be secured and included in the application and attached in Part G. Include detailed costs in Part E. (5 points) The Parks Gateway Enhancements project is "shovel ready" if selected as a grant award. Design and engineering has been completed. Landscaping designs have been completed. Two park ID signs have already been constructed as part of a previous ACOS grant award during the redevelopment of Duncan Park. After reviewing the project with the City Planning and Public Works Departments, there are no permits, government fees or zoning changes required. 8. Describe the planning process that identified this specific project as a priority. Is this project listed as a priority in a master plan, site specific plan or other adopted planning document? If so, discuss that plan. Describe the relationship of the project to any local, regional, state or system-wide master plan. Give the name of each plan and list related element(s) within the plan. Was this project identified through an independent community planning process? Describe this process. (5 points) 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 16 of94 • • • • • This project was identif ed through an independent community planning process by the City's Community Deve opment Department. During the planning process that started in 1999 through 2002, th City was desirous of a signage plan that would blend the various signage needs (Civic Ce ter, Entry Port, District and Park Identification) throughout the City in one uniform des gn theme. Unfortunately, the project was put on hold due to a lack of funding resourc s. Recently, the economy has begun to improve and Duncan Park was redeveloped with help from a grant from Arapahoe County Open Spaces and the use of shareback funds. New park identificatio signage was constructed in Duncan Park that has now raised the priority of making all p rk identification sign age uniform by replacing all of the existing 50 year old park signs. This grant request is n ta typical site improvement project which would be included in a long range planning ocument. This project has been an issue for over twenty years as our current park ident fication signage has ~ecome very outdated. Due to more pressing City of Engle ood commitments a.nd priorities as well as the economy, this project has not been f nded but has been thbrou~hly reviewed and would be a welcomed project by e resi~ents of Eng1ewo6d and Arapahoe County . Even though this proj ct is not listed in a sp.ecific pfanning document, parks gateway . t ~ enhancements are fu damental to park usage /This enhancement project creates a community identity w th the park system, welcomes new users and establishes the level of care and maintena ce that is provid~d jn our parks. 9. Discuss any efforts to obtain public input, disseminate public information, develop partnerships, develo partnerships for cash finding or in-kind contributions, and garner community supports ecifically related to this project. In most cases, evidence of a transparent public pr cess will be required. For acquisitions, the process may be tied to a public process for a overall master plan rather than identification of a specific parcel. For regional trails, th process may need to include notification and/or involvement of residents from adjac nt jurisdictions. Discuss any objections or opposition to this project. Include any etters, petitions, news articles, or other documents evidencing opposition. What ha been done to address concerns and how has the opposition responded? (5 point ) Planning for the park gateway signage initially started in 1999. The City of Englewood was interested instr ngthening the community image and heightening awareness of Englewood. Tacito D sign Inc. was selected for design development of entry port monumentation, dis rict signage design and park gateway signage enhancements. 2015 Standard/Small Grant A plication Page 17of94 An advisory committee was formed in 1999 to help guide the process and to communicate with their constituencies in the community. The advisory committee was comprised of policy-makers, local merchants, residents and City staff. In 2002, the Englewood Parks & Recreation Commission selected a park signage design concept. The Commission is an advisory board made up of Englewood citizens who guide public policy for the Parks and Recreation Department and make recommendations as public input to Englewood City Council. During Parks and Recreation Commission meetings held between October 2012 and January 2013, parks signage was again reviewed and approved in order to have new sign age in place for the Duncan Park Redevelopment grant (meeting minutes are attached Part G -10. Other). Along with the successful redevelopment of Duncan Park, the new park identification signs have received a great deal of attenti9n fr()m folks throughout Englewood. Many citizens have requested that the gateway sigQs to their nearby parks receive the same upgrades. All Parks and Recreation Commission meetings are open to the public and their comments and input are invaluable in addressing any public concerns. We have received no objections or opposition toward this proposed project. 10. Describe how this project addresses inclusivity per the Americans with Disabilities Act guidelines. (3 points) Parks Gateway Enhancements is an atypical project that does not fall into the guidelines of ADA . The project is a gateway enhancement that allows all individuals to identify specific Englewood parks and to enjoy all the amenities each park has to offer. 11. Discuss the need and urgency for this project and why it is a priority. What opportunities are lost if this project is not funded now? (5 points) The need and urgency for this project is great . The project was started 16 years ago and has stalled several times due to the economy and lack of sufficient budget funding in recent years. The City is currently embarking on a new era of identifying who we are and what services we provide to our citizens through the development of a new mission and vision statement: To promote and ensure a high quality of life, economic vitality and a uniquely desirable community identity by proactively collaborating with our • • citizens and businesses, developing a safe environment, creating opportunity and • through the provision of reliable, affordable and flexible services . 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 18of94 • • • City Council has given pproval for the Parks Gateway Enhancements as an initial step towards this new miss on and vision. If the project is not fu ded now, it will likely lose its priority standing as other City departments compete for City Council endorsement and funding. 12. If successful in obtaini g this grant, how will the agency use this project to inform citizens about the valu of the Arapahoe County Open Space sales and use tax? Address the public outreach pl n, signage plan, celebration, dedication, etc. (2 points) The Parks Gateway En ancements Project is about creating an identity. As recognition of the grant funding a d support, permanent sign age identifying ACOS has been incorporated into the esign of all 18 signs and will be installed as part of gateway enhancements at all 1 park locations. Approved sign designs are attached in Part G - 10. Information will also b added to the City of Englewood's web site identifying the project and fundings urces during arid fo1Jowi1w construction. The Englewood Herald will run inform tion and a hews stories throughout the project. Social media . . such as Facebook and witter will be .us~cl to provide project updates, recognize accomplishments and promotEt funding partners . 13. How much of your pla ned casn mat~h is s~cur.ed? How much still needs to be raised and what are your pla s for raisi'ng ·additional f!Jf'ids? What is your back up plan if you are unable to raise th se funds? Describe the cash and in-kind partnerships established for this project. This oes not include partners who have contributed to previous phases or partners th t plan to contribute to-future phases. Explain if partnerships were not possible or neces ary for this project. Include all partner support letters in Part G and clearly label on t e section cover page. Include match from all partners in the Part E Budget. All support I tters must be dated within the last six months to be eligible . (5 points) The entire cash mate Funds. There are no were not possible for is secured. We are planning on using Arapahoe County Shareback her cash or in-kind partnerships with this project. Partnerships he gateway enhancements in ten park locations at this time. 14. Briefly discuss suppo from entities and user groups that are supporting the project in other ways than cash or in-kind contributions. Support letters should come from users, user groups, com mu ity members, volunteers, schools, etc. A maximum of five (5) support letters shoul be attached in Part G and clearly labeled on the section cover page. All letters shou d be dated within the last six months. (5 points) Englewood has broad based support for the Parks Gateway Enhancements project. Englewood Unleashe is a community dog park advocacy group. Their goal is to 2015 Standard/Small Grant Ap lication Page 19of94 enhance the off-leash parks within Englewood. The group raises funds for improvements within off-leash · parks, performs monthly park cleanups and ensures that pet owners are • responsible stewards of the parks. Pirate Youth Sports is a local non-profit organization that serves Englewood youth by providing a variety of sports activities in many of our parks. Improved park signage would improve identification of parks and athletic fields used by Pirate Youth Sports and visiting sports organizations. Englewood Schools serves our community's academic and athletic needs for youth. The City and school district partner on shared use of numerous sports fields and tennis courts. Mr. Gillit is a community member and citizen advocate for our parks. He resides adjacent to one of our larger community parks and Is a huge supporter of our Parks and Recreation programs. Douglas Garrett Is an Englewood citiien an airman of the Englewood Parks and Recreation Commission. Douglas~nd ·t~e ofithe commission unanimously support the Gateway Enhancements a/maj r 'lis a anCJ 1B~ntity improvement to Englewood's parks. ,, "Ir Certification of accuracy for the lnformation~provlded in Part F: Applicant certifies that all of the above answers are accurate and that all information submitted is true to the best of their knowledg . Authorized Signature: ~ (must be signed by high ~n= Print Name and Title: ,£,_US~ )>. k.~ .,~. B--.Al'r jt _ __,"")c..,_,.. 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 20of94 Date: /-£?--4- • • • • • Part G -Attachments (1 Use this as the table of conte ts cover page for the required application attachments. Attachments in this section a e supporting documentation to the questions answered in Part F. To receive the full amount of oints available for each question, sufficient supporting documentation must be attac ed. List all attachments in order, by name/title and by page number. 1. Evidence of su port from highest authority (official letter or resolution**) - including com itment to complete the project; statement that match funds are secured; and c rtification that the project will be open to the public or serve a public purpose upon completion 2. Evidence of co mitment to long-term maintenance (official letter or resolution) 3. Evidence of pr perty ownership/legal access (legal documentation) 4. Evidence of co munity support (letters of support -max. 5, known objections) 5. Evidence of co mitment from funding partners (cash match/in-kind match support letter ) 6. Photos (pre-su mittal) 7. Site maps (pro ect location maps) 8. GIS shapefile, i applicable (include pn compact disc) 9. Other (clearly itle: acquisition documentation, if applicable, or other supporting documents) **Resolution from a Governi g Body or an Official Letter from Highest Authority must include all listed applicable items an must designate a specific person to sign the grant agreement and related grant administration ocuments. ** 2015 Standard/Small Grant Applicati n Page 21of94 Part G Attachments -1. Resolution 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 22 of 94 • • • • • • Part G Attachments-2. Lon -Term Maintenance {' c T y 0 F ENGLEWOOD DEPAR MfNT Of PARKS AND RE~R~ATION Arapahoe Cou ~ty Open 6934 South Uma Street, Centennial, C080112 December 1, 2014 ace and Trails Advisory Board tA Re: Long~Term Park Ma i nt nance The City or Englewood Par and Recreatio n Department Is committed to the long-term maiotenance .and managemente-f all E . ewood parks and park infrastructure within the City. The City of Englewood .allocates funds for the Ion -term maintenance, repa ir and replacement of park lnfrastrueture. Ongoing maintenance functions in ude : sign maintenance, sign repair/replacement, graffiti removal and landscape maintenance. partment is funded annually through the Oty of Englewood's General Fund .as part of the mre servf provided to tr.e citizens of the C"ttv of Englewood. Maintenance of the Englewood ParkS Gateway Enhancements Is currently Included In all long-term maintenance programs .and activities arid will con nue to be a part of all such activities Into the future. Jerreli Biack 1155 \IV. Oxford "-"~nu Engiewooo~ Colm ado 601 IO Phon e 303·762·2600 Fax 30l·i'fl2<?66 8 ""'""!. ~~ilf"'''OOO&cw org 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 23 of 94 Part G Attachments -3. Evidence of property ownership ·---------~----~~- ENGLEWOOD PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM C'lY of Engle ' od Warren Sa llie Iliff ii=::=:::; Wesley Baker j~~~~~k Harvard Vassar ~: :!!~+~~ College II:====:-::: 1 City of Englewood I Department of Parks and Recreation . . 1155 W. Oxford Avenue ]2015 Standard/Small Grant Application E I d CO 80110 !Pa e 24 of 94 ng eWOO ' g (303) 762·2680 • (303) 762-2688 FAX Ill c: 5 PARKS .. PLAYGROUNDS Sel ieview Centenn ;at Cushing Baker Jason Miner Field Duncan Emerson Romans Rotolo Bales·Logan GREcNBELT;ORAINAGE WAYS Herb Hosanna · Athlet ;c Comptex Barde Clarkson Amherst Northwest Greenbelt Southwest Greenbe t SWIMMING POOLS Sinclair Jr. High Schcol Englewood High School GOLF COURSE River Go~f Course CENTERS Malley Sr. Center Englewood Rec . Center n • I • Arap hoe County Parcel Number Information • Belleview Park 033752325 031992184 034389211 Centennial Park 031978165 031978246 031978238 031978173 032594322 • 032620269 031978416 Cushing Park 033564561 033564545 Baker Park 031002621 • 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 25 of 94 Jason Park 031964547 031964555 Miller Field 031943281 Emerson Park 031035112 Romans Park 031045665 Rotolo Park 031987326 Bates-Logan Park 031012996 • 0 I ~·~· d 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 26of94 Belleview Park 033752325 031992184 034389211 • :.: :--: j~:= ·:;: ;:: -·~ . .,,-... -,:-.-=-"---. • • • • • 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 27of94 Belleview Park 033752325 031992184 034389211 Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page 1 of I -. PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: Legal Desc: 2014 Appraised Value 2014 Assessed Value 033752325 2077-09-4-00-015 1500 W Layton Ave Englewood Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Englewood Ind Area 3537.00 47.2400 That Part Of Se 114 Sec g.5-68 Oesc As Beg 37 Ft E & 1054 Ft N Of Sw Cor Of Sd Se 1/4 Th E 308.26 Ft Th Se 648 Ft 4.09 Ft & 287.91 Ft Th N 93.79 Ft Th Se 511.4 Ft Th S 210.56 Ft Th E 146.5 Ft & 96.3 Ft Th N 10 Ft Th Ne 98.8 Ft Th S To A Pt On N Line Of W Belleview Ave Th E 326.78 Ft & 300.4 Ft To W Line Of S Inca Dr Th Nw Alg Sd W Row Line 240.5 Ft & 293.75 Ft Th Ne 63.42 Ft Th Nw 144.75 Ft Th Ne Total 24,693,293 7,161,055 Building 0 0 2013 Miii Levy: Land 24,693,293 7,161,055 72.800 • Land Line Units Land Value Land Use • 47.2400 AC 24,693,293 Recreation Note : Land Line data above corresponds to the initial appraised value and does not reflect subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any. • Not au parcels have avallable photos I sketches . In some cases a skelch may be difficult to read. Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from lhe exterior of the build The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty lhe aCC1Jracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responslbnlty or liability to any user. Although some parcels may have mulUple buildings and photos, at this lime our system is limited lo 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. So!T}' for . inconvenience. 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 28of94 New Search • • • • Arapahoe County -Parcel Search New Search ,...... _____ ._._.,._, ___________ ~~--· ... ...,..."'I--·~ ............. ..,,,..·-·"' ... ,.._._ .. ......,...._ ..... ...,. .... ~. PIN: AJN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: 031992184 2077-09-4-0 -014 *Photo View Par el Map Englewood ity Of 1000 Engle ood Pkwy Englewood, 0 80110-2373 Englewood I d Area 3537.00 2.1740 Page 1of1 Printer Frie Treasurer'~ Inform Sales by Tax Year Nelghbor1 2013/ 2011 {. 2009/ 2007f. 2005/'. Complete Neighbor1 Sa tes lnformalion Hi Tax District U Legal Desc: Beg 1035 Ft E & 30 Ft N Of Sw Cor Se 1/4 Th N 370 Ft Th Nw 287.91 Ft Th S 577.11FtThE2t Ft To Beg S c 9-5-68 Total Building Land 2014 Appraised Value 1,136,400 0 1,136,400 2014 Assessed Value 329,556 0 329,556 2013 Mill Levy: 72 .800 r·-------·-,.................,....._,. .... ~ ....... "/"""""'" .,._,.. =-· . ~--~-.,_._ __ ....... .-..-~---~···--.... --.~-~ .-................................ "" .,_.,_ ...... , .. ,_. ·····-..... -........-~--~~ ~-- Sale Book Page Date Price Type A713 6443 MulUSched 10-24-1997 395,000 DEED 3619 0343 MultiSched 04-01-1982 1,004,900 WARR 3443 0484 07-01-1981 355,166 WARR Land Una Units Land Value Land Use 94700.000 SF 947,000 Recreation Note . Land Una data above corresponds to th initial appraised value and does not reffect subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any. • Not all parcels have avallable photos I sketches In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read , Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from the exterior or the bu ~I The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does I warranty the accuracy or any sketch , nor assumes any responslblllty or Dabillty to any user. Although some parcels may have mulllple build s and photos, at this tJme our system Is fimlted to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sony fo Inconvenience . New Search 2015 Standard/Small Grant Applicat on Page 29 of 94 Arapahoe County -Parcel Search PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: Legal Desc: 034389211 20n -os+o1 -020 1225 WBelleview Ave Englewood Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Englewood Ind Area 3537.00 3.0610 Lots 1-4 Blk 1 Mavdon Sub --~--~-~~~---·--·-·------- 2014 Appraised Value 2014 Assessed Value Total 1,333,440 386,698 Building 0 0 2013 Miii Levy: Land 1,333 ,440 386,698 72.800 Land Line Units land Value land Use Page 1of1 , 133344.0000 SF 1,333,440 Vacant Commercial Lots Note : Land Line data above corresponds to the Initial appraised value and does not reflect subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any. ---· --~~~-· • Not all parcels have available photos I sketches In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read . Please contact the Assessors Office ror assistance . Measurements taken from the exterior of the bui !d The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy or any sketch, nor assumes any responsibility or RabiUty to any user. Although some parcels may have multiple bulldings and photos, at this time our system is limited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sony for . inconvenience . 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 30of94 New Search • • • • • • 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 31of94 Centennial Park 031978165 031978246 031978238 031978173 032594322 032620269 031978416 ( & .... Arapahoe County -Parcel Search PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: 031978165 2on-os-1-oo-02s Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Vacant Unplatted Parcels 2942.00 7.0600 Page 1 of 1 , Legal Desc: Parcel Of Land In S 1/2 Ne 1/4 Sec 8 Oesc As Beg 400.2 Ft E Of Nw Cor S 1/2 Ne 1/4 Th Se 1355.88 Ft To Pt On N Line Of W Union Ave Th E Alg Sd Line 660 Ft MIL W Of E Line Of Ne 1/4 Sec 8 Th N 130 Ft Th W 1021.87 Ft Th Nw 1232.53 Ft Th W 130 Ft To Beg 8-5-68 2014 Appraised Value 2014 Assessed Value LandUne Total 3,530 1,024 Units 7.0600AC Building 0 0 2013 Mill Levy: Land Value 910 ,740 Land 3,530 1,024 68 .749 Land Use Vac Unplatted Area> 5.0 Acres but< 10.0 Acres Note · Land Une data above corresponds to the initial appraised value and does not renecJ subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any. ------·· ~~----"'-"-· --~-~~-----------------~----- • Not all parcels have available photos I sketches . In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read. Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from the exterior of the build The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the aCCtJracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responslblUty or llabHity to any user. Although some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos, at this time our system Is Umlted lo 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sony for . Inconvenience. 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 32of94 New Search • • • • • Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page I of 1 PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: Legal Desc: 2014 Appraised Value 2014 Assessed Value Sale 031978246 2077 -08-1-00-039 Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Vacant Unplatted Parcels 2942.00 11.1300 Beg 655. 78 Ft S Of Nw Cor Of E 112 Se 1/4 Ne 1 /4 Th Sw 1104.45 FtTh Se 356.97 FtTh E 968. i Fl Th N 508 Ft To Beg Sec 8-5-68 Total 5,565 1,614 Book Page 6942 0546 Building 0 0 2013 Mill Levy: Date 04-09-1993 Land 5,565 1,614 68.749 Price 0 Type QC ----... ~-~-- • LandLlne Units 11.1300AC Land Value 5,565 Land Use Vac Unplatted Area> 10.0 Acres but< 35.1 Acres Note · Land Line data above corresponds to the initial appraised value and does not reflect subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any • Not all parcels have avaHable pllolos I sketches . • In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read. Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from the exterior of the bund The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responsibility or llabllity to any user. Altllough some parcels may have mulllple buMdlngs and photos. at this time our system Is limited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sorry for . Inconvenience . New Search 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 33of94 Arapahoe County -Parcel Search PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner Ust Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Nefghborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: 031978238 2077-08-1-00-038 Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Vacant Unplatted Parcels 2942.00 14.6100 Page I of I -- Legal Oesc: Beg 988.77 Ft E Of Nw Cor Of S 112 Ne 1/4 Sec 8 Th E 391.2 Ft Th S 275 Ft Th Se 631.2 Ft Th~ 180.78 Ft Th Sw 1104.45 Ft Th Se 356 .97 Ft Th W 53.09 Ft Th Nw 832.53 Ft Th Ne 492.09 Ft To Beg Sec 8-5-68 2014 Appraised Value 2014 Assessed Value LsndUne Total 7,305 2,118 Units 14.6100AC Building 0 0 2013 Mill Levy: Land Value 7,305 Land 7,305 2,118 68.749 Land Use Vac Unplatted Area> 10.0 Acres but< 35.1 Acres Note : Land Line data above corresponds to the initial appraised value and does not reflect subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any . • Not all parcels have available photos I sketches . In some cases a sketch may be dlfficult to read . Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from the exterior of the buUd The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy of any skelch, nor assumes any responsibility or Habllity to any user. Although some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos, at this time our system Is limited lo 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sorry for. Inconvenience . 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 34of94 New Search • • • • • Ar-apahoe County ~ Parcel Search Page 1 of I PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: Legal Oesc: 2014 Appraised Value 2014 Assessed Value 031978173 2on-os.1-oo-031 Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Englewood Ind Area 3537.00 1.9300 Beg 538 .77 Ft E Of Nw Cor S 112 Ne 1/4 Sec 8 Th E 450 Ft Th Sw 492.09 Ft Th Nw 400 Ft To Po Total 300 87 Building 0 0 2013 Mill Levy: Land 300 87 68 .749 Land Line Units Land Value Land Use 1.0000 LT 300 Open Space Note · Land Line data above correspcnds to the initial appraised value and does not refTect subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any . • Not all parcels have available photos I sketches . • In some cases a sketch may be dlllicult lo read . Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from the exterior of the build · The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty lhe accuracy of any sketch , nor assumes any responsibility or liability lo any user. Although some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos , at this lime our system Is limited lo 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number . Sony for Inconvenience. New Search 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 35 of 94 I ~apahoe County -Parcel Search Page I of l ·- PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: 032594322 2077-08-1-00-048 Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110.2373 Vacant Unplatted Parcels 2942.00 4 .1000 Legal Oesc: Beg 141 .58 Ft W Of Ne Cor W 112 Se 1/4 Ne 1 /4 Sec 8-5-68 Th Alg Curve To Left 493 .87 Ft Th S 8.58 Ft Th Nw 631 .2 Ft Th N 275 Ft To N Line Se 1/4 Ne 1/4 Th E 458.42 Ft To Beg 2014 Appraised Value 2014 Assessed Value Land Line Total 2,050 595 Units 4 .1000AC Building 0 0 2013 Mill Levy: Land Value 528,900 Land 2,050 595 68 .749 Land Use Vac Unplatted Area > 1 .0 Acre but < 5.0 Acres Note . Land Lfne data above corresponds to Iha initial appraised value and does not reflect subsequent appeal related adjustments . if any • Not all parcels have available photos I sketches . In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read . Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from the exterior or the build Tile Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responsibility or llablllty to any user. Although some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos, at this Ume our system Is limited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sorry tor , Inconvenience. 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 36of94 New Search • • • • · Ar.apahoe County -Parcel Search Page 1of1 PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: Legal Oesc: 2014 Appraised Value 2014 Assessed Value Sa fe 032620269 2077-08-1-00-052 2501 W Union Ave Englewood Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Vacant Unplatted Parcels 2942.00 1.8400 Parcel Of Land In Ne 1/4 Sec 8 Desc As Beg At A Pt On N Line Of Co Rd No 1 VVh Is 77.4 Ft Nw From Se Cor Se 1/4 Ne 1/4 Sec 8 Th Ne 101.1 Fl Th Nw 185.06 Ft Th W 538.24 Ft Th S 130 Fl T E 538.24 Fl Th Ne 101 .1 Ft To Pob Sec 8-5-68 ~·" --'·-·----~-- Total 920 267 Bull ding 0 0 2013 Mill Levy: Land 920 267 68 .749 Book Page Date Price 8107 7057 05-02-2001 0 • .. ---·· ------------·-·-. A820 -~=~3 -__ ·---~---~~~~~:-=~-·----·---·----·-=:~.~~ Type CTOR SWAR Land Line Units Land Value Land Use 1.8400 AC 237,360 Vac Unplatted Area > 1.0 Acre but < 5.0 Acres Note . Lend Line data above corresponds to the iniUal appraised value end does not refled subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any. • Not all parcels have available photos I sketches. • In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read . Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from the exterior of the build The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch , nor assumes any responsibility or llabffity to any user. Although some parcels may have multiple buHdlngs and photos, at this time our system Is limited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sony for . Inconvenience . New Search 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application PaRe 37of94 Arapahoe County -Parcel Search PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List: Owner Address: C lty /State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: Legal Desc: 2014 Appraised Value 2014 Assessed Value 031978416 20n-OB-1·03-009 Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Englewood Ind Area 3537.00 6 .2300 Lots 1-7 Blk 2 & Vac W Tufts Ave Adj & Lot 3 Blk 3 Cent Ind Park Total 3,256,546 944,398 Building 0 0 2013 Mill Levy: Land 3,256,546 944,398 68 .749 Page I of 1 • Land Line Units Land Value Land Use 6.2300 AC 3,256,546 Recreation Note Land Une data above corresponds to the Initial eppraised value and does not reflect subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any. -· --· .. ·-··~-~-- • Not all parcels have ava!lable photos/ sketches . In some cases a sketch may be difficult lo read. Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance. Measurements taken from the exterior of the build The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch , nor assumes any responsibility or liabUity to any user . Although some parcels may have mulUple buildings and photos, al !his Ume our system Is limited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sorry for . Inconvenience . 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Pa2e 38 of 94 New Search • • • • •• • 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 39 of 94 Q ·-·· ··'' ·---, l •• I .. ·;;,;:.·1 Cushing Park 033564561 033564545 ··-·-··::£ ..... --··· ...... .J ll .. I.. .• ···1d. Arapahoe County -Parcel Search PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: 033564561 1971-34-3-00-079 Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Non-Ind Englewood 3586.00 4 .7500 Page 1 of I - Legal Oesc: That Part Of Sw 1/4 Sec 34-4-68 Desc As Beg 30 Ft S & 100 Ft E Of Nw Cor Of Sd Sw 1/4 Th S 125FtThW100 Ft Th S 519.5 Ft MIL Th E 334 Ft Th N 676 Ft Th W231.35 Ft To Beg (Park} Ex Road Sec 34-4-68 ~----~------~-~- 2014 Appraised Value 2014 Assessed Value Total 3,207,105 930,060 Building 0 0 2013 Mill Levy: Land 3,207,105 930,060 72.800 Land Une Units Land Value Land Use 4.7500 AC 0 Recreation Note . Land Line data above corresponds to the initial appraised value and does not reflect subsequent appaal related adjustments, if any. • Not all parcels have available photos I sketches_ In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read , Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from the exterior of the build The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responsibility or Uablllty to any user. Although some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos, at this Ume our system Is Dmited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sony for . Inconvenience. 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 40 of 94 New Search • • • . Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Pagel of I • • PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List Owner Address: Clty/State/Zlp: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: Legal Desc: 2014 Appraised Vslue 2014 Assessed Velue -----· ·~-~ 033564545 1971-33-4-00-083 840 W Dartmouth Ave Englewood Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Englewood Ind North 1971 3538.00 4 .9500 That Part Of Se 1/4 Sec 33-4-68 Desc As Beg 1 B Ft W & 30 Ft S Of Ne Cor Of Sd Se 1/4 Th W 180.7 Ft To E Row lineof At & Sf Row Th Sw Alg Sd Row Line 733.22 Ft Th E 420.33 Ft Th N 695.37 Ft To Beg Ex Road Sec 33-4-68 Total 2,177,424 631,453 Building 21,204 6,149 2013 Miii Levy: Land 2,156,220 625 ,304 72 .800 Lsnd Une Units Land Value Land Use 4.9500 AC 2,156,220 Recreation Nole Land Line data above corresponds to the Initial appraised value and does not reflect subsequent appeal related adjustments. if any. --~--.~---------------·----·· .-.. ~ ... ·£..>···.-........-~~--.. ----·--·----·-------·-- • Not all parcels have available photos I sketches . • In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read. Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from the ex1erlorof the build i The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the acairacy of any sketch, nor assumes any responsiblllty or liability to any user. Although some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos, at this time our system Is limited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sony for . Inconvenience. New Search 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application 0'.3no 111 r.f OJI S ., IS ..... f '. cu • cu ..... ' "' I zt: t:::.., Zts • :~ ! : I ' l !'" I i ~ l l W BAKER AVE 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 42of94 _i__ J z( zJ i Baker Park 031002621 001 ...... I a -u.:) @ ';_! Votol•d • lt~1 l'C tU1 PJU .. . • • • • Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Pagel of l PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: Legal Oesc: 2014 Appraised Value 2014 Assessed Value 031002621 1971 ·28-3-03-023 Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Southlawn Gardens Annex 2070.00 0.8350 Lots 7·8 Blk 2 Southlawn Gdns Annex Dedicated To Public For Park Total 600 174 Building 0 0 2013 Miii Levy: Land 600 174 72 .800 Land Une Units Land Value Land Use 2.0000 LT 600 Tract Note : Land Une data above corresponds lo the initial appraised value and does not renect subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any . •• Not au parcels have available photos I sketches . • In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read. Please contad the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from the exterior or the bulld ' The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy or any sketch, nor assumes any responslbillty or llablfity to any user. Although some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos, at this Ume our system Is Qmlted to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sorry for inconvenience. New Search 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application D:>ao .d:l nf Q.d 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 44 of 94 ~~~lmt .1-... "'!" • ·~·"'" • • • • Jason Park 031964547 031964555 • l I ARAPAHOE COUNTY COLORADO TOWNSHIP SECTIOS .QUAR'fER SE~S . •• '~ .• • t)~--~8:"h .I.~""~-•••. ,:...,,,...v ..... • • • Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page 1of1 PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: Legal Desc: 2014 Appraised Vslue 2014 Assessed Value 031964547 2on-04-4-0o-032 1025 WQuincy Ave Englewood Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Oxford Heights 2nd Fig 1692.00 4.noo Beg 660 Ft W Of Se Cor Of Se 1/4 Th N 659.5 Ft Th W 330.5 Ft Th S 659.5 Ft Th E 330 .5 Ft To Beg Ex Rts/Way 4-5-68 Total 238,500 69,165 Building 0 0 2013 Mill Levy: Land 238,500 69,165 72.800 Land Una Units Land Value Land Use 4. 7700 AC 238,500 Recreation Note . Land Line data above ccrresponds to thB initial appraised value and does not reflect subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any. • Not all parcels have available photos I sketches . • In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read. Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from the exterior of lhe build The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responsibility or liability to any user. Although some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos. at this time our system Is limited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sorry for . Inconvenience . New Search 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application D:>ao .Ill; nf Q.11. ., Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page 1of1 · PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: Legal Oesc: 2014 Appraised Value 2014 Assessed Value 031964555 20n-04-4-0o-033 Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Oxford Heights 2nd Fig 1692.00 3.2800 Beg 1320.1 Ft W & 659 .5 Ft S Of Ne Cor Of S 1/2 Of Se 1/4 Th E 330 Ft Th S 361.5 Ft Th W 82.E Ft Th S 50 Ft Th W 82.5 Ft Th S 57 Ft Th W 82.5 Ft Th S 26 Ft Th W 82.5 Ft Th N 494 .5 Ft To Be Exempt Total 164,000 47,560 Build Ing 0 0 2013 Mill Levy: Land 164,000 47,560 72 .800 Land Line Units Land Value Land Use 3.2800 AC 164 ,000 Recreation Note : Land Una data above corresponds to the initial appraised value end does not reflect subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any. • Not all parcels have available photos I sketches. In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read . Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance. Measurements taken from the exterlor of the build The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responsibility or Uability to any user. Although some parcels may have mulUple buildings and photos, at this time our system Is Hmlted to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sony for . Inconvenience. New Search 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application o.,.,..,. JI C. r.f OJI • • • • • • 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 47 of 94 Miller Field 031943281 Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page I of I - PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: Legal Desc: 2014 Appraised Value 2014 Assessed Value 031943281 20n-0J.2-oo-004 3649 S Cherokee St Englewood Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Jacksons Broadway Heights 1324.00 o.noo Beg At A Pt 765 Ft S Of Cen Of Intersect Of W Hampden Ave & S Cherokee, Th W 309 Ft To Pt < 5 Delaware, Th S 125 Ft Th E 309 Ft To Pt, Th N 125 Ft To Beg Ex Rds 3-5-68 Total 38,500 11,165 Building 0 0 2013 Miii Levy: Land 38,500 11, 165 72.800 --·----·~--~--·----------· ~-·~---~~-- Lend Line Units Land Value Land Use 0.7700 AC 38,500 Recreation Note : Land Line data above corresponds to the Initial appraised value and does not renect subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any ----«n •· ~-·-----·--~--·• ·~~-------- • Not all parcels have avaflable photos I sketches _ In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read . Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from the exterior of the build , The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responsiblUty or llabiltty to any user. Although some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos, at this lime our system Is limited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sorry for , Inconvenience . New Search 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application D::>ao .11.R nf Q.d • • • • • • f I IP ~ 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 49of94 Emerson Park 031035112 ... ;\rapahoe County -Parcel Search PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner list: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: 031035112 1971-35-2-00-002 Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Vacant Unplatted Parcels 2942.00 1.1620 Page I of 1 - Legal Desc: Beg 16 Ft E Of Ne Cor Of Lot 1 Dobbins Resub Th E 166 Ft Th S 305 Ft Th W 166 Ft Th N 305 F To Beg 35-4-68 2014 Appraised Value 2014 Assessed Value Land Line Total 149,640 43,396 Units 1.1600AC Building 0 0 2013 Mill Levy: Land Value 149,640 Land 149,640 43,396 72800 Land Use Vac Unplatted Area > 1,0 Acre but < 5.0 Acres Note: Land Line data above corresponds to the initial appraised value and does not reflect subsequent appeal related adjustments , if any ----~·~---·---,--~-~· .......... ,. ___ ---..-...... -·-~~----,~-------,-·---------~~. • Not au parcels have avaftable photos I sketches. In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read. Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from the exterior of the build ' The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responslblllty or liability lo any user. Although some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos, at this time our system is limited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sorry for. inconvenience. 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page SO of 94 New Search • • • • 'vi I • • 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 51of94 Romans Park Romans Park 031045665 Ii -j~~;=~;r-i' Arapahoe County -Parcel Search PIN: AIN : Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List: Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: 031045665 1971-35-4-00-005 Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Non-Ind Englewood 3586.00 4.4520 Page 1of1 - Legal Desc: Beg 30 Ft S Of Ne Cor Sw 1/4 Se 1/4 Th S 150 Ft Th W 1293.04 Th N 150 Ft Th E 1292.87 Ft To Beg 35-4-68 2014 Appraised Value 2014 Assessed Value Total 3,168,793 918,950 .:. -----~~-·--' ~· ------------............... ~· ·~· ·~· ~-·---·-· ·~-~~ Building 162,568 47,145 2013 Mill Levy: Land 3,006,225 871,805 83.418 Land Une Units Land Value Land Use 193950.0000 SF 3,006,225 Recreation Note Land Line data above corresponds to tha Initial appraised value and does not reflect subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any. • Not all parcels have available photos I sketches . In some cases a sketch may be dlff'ICUll to read. Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from the exterior of the build The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responslblllty or liability to any user . Although some parcels may have multiple build ings and photos, at this time our system Is llmlled to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number . Sorry for . Inconvenience. 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 52of94 New Search • • • • • • ;:;;:;: • .JJ;i.~~;_.~..ir.~~_._~.....,..-,.,...,.,..,....,...,.~ ..... .....,._....,...,._.;:;;.._.~...,....;..;_..,;_.""'1'.;;M~....._.;;......,-..,,......,..;.......,~~~~--~~·~c ·;~ 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 53 of 94 Rotolo Park 031987326 ~-· ~-~~-.... --0 ... .:.;..~.•·,......,..:-.x-w. • .........__;_,......,_, • .,_.""-. Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page 1of1 - PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List Owner Address: City /State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: Legal Desc: 2014 Appraised Value 2014 Assessed Value 031987326 2on-09-1-oo-053 Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Jensen Sub Neighborhood 250.00 2.4800 Beg 995 Ft S & 30 Ft W Of Ne Cor Of Ne 1/4 Sec 9 Th W 65.2 Ft Th Nw 140 Ft Th Sw 60 Ft Th N 32.09 Ft Th Nw 11.92 Ft Th N 80.92 Ft & 258.97 Ft Th Se 154.65 Ft Th E 121 Ft To Pt On W Line S Huron St Th S 47 Ft & 144 Ft & 164 Ft To Pob 34-4-68 Total 300 87 Building 0 0 2013 Mill Levy: Land 300 87 72 .600 Land Line Units Land Value Land Use 1.0000 LT 300 Tract Note . Land Line data above corresponds to the initial appraised value and does not reflect subsequent appeal related adjustments .. if any. • Not all parcels have available photos I sketches. In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read . Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from the exterior of the bulld 1 The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy of any skelch, nor assumes any responsibility or liability to any user. Althoogh some parcels may have muiUple buildings and photos, at this lime our system Is flmlled to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sorry for . inconvenience. 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 54of94 New Search • • • • • • 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page SS of 94 Bates-Logan Park 031012996 ...... , '4 l ' , Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page 1 of 1 · PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List Owner Address: City/State/Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: Legal Desc: 2014 Appraised Value 2014 Assessed Value 031012996 1971-34-1-00-038 Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Non-Ind Englewood 3586.00 5.2800 Beg 840 Ft N & 30 Ft E Of Sw Car Of Se 1/4 Ne 1/4 Th N 150 Ft Th E 296 Ft Th N 300 Ft Th E 2£ Ft Th S 76.6 Ft Th Alg Curve Se 285.1 Ft Th Sw 68. 7 Ft Th Nw 122.1 Ft Th Alg Curve Sly & Sely 331.3FtThW106.4 Ft Th N 25 Ft Th W25 Ft Th S 25 Ft Th W 56.5 Ft Th N 150 Ft Th W296 Ft To Beg 34-4-68 Total 2,851,960 827,068 Building 0 0 2013 Mill Levy: Land 2,851,960 827,068 72 .800 ~---~··-""'--··-~·..-M------··--··----·--· .. ·-· ---·· ---M·-~---·--·----- Land Una Units Land Value Land Use • 5.2800 AC o Recreation • Note : Land Une data above corresponds to the initial appraised value and does not reflect subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any. • Not all parcels have ava11able photos I sketches . In some cases a sketch may be dlllicult to read . Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance. Measurements taken from the exterior of the build The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does nol warranty the accuracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responsibility or liability to any user. Although some parcels may have multiple bulldlngs and photos, at this time our system Is Umited lo 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sorry for . Inconvenience . 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application PaQe 56 of94 New Search • Part G A~Ochments -4. Evidence of Community Suppo{' • c • • T y 0 F ENGLEWOOD PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION January 8, 2015 Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Program 6934 S. Lima St. Unit A Centennial. Colorado 80112 Advisory Board Members: I am writing this letter of support on behalf of the Englewood Parks and Recreation Commission in support of the Englewood Parks and Recreation Department• s grant application for Gateway Enhancements in Englewood parks . Gateway enhancements in the parks will improve the overall perception of Englewood as well as improve the connectivity with park users by clearly identifying park names and locations. Enhancements to the parks gateways will reflect the ongoing improvements taking place in the City of Englewood. These upgrades to the parks will reiterate to the public that the City and the Department of Parks and Recreation values and takes pride their parks and their community. Thank you for your consideration of the Gateway Enhancements for Englewood Parks. Sincerely, 1 / __-j-- uglas Garrett Chair Englewood Parks and Recreation Commission 1155 W. Oxford Avenue Englewood, Colorado 801 to Phone 303-762-2680 Fax 303-762-2688 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application wwwdenglewoodi;ol,IS Page 57of94 Englewood Schools A Relentless Focus On Learning December4, 2014 Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Program 6934 S. Lima St. Unit A Centennial, Colorado 80112 Dear Board Members, BRIAN K. EWERT Superintendent of Schools On behalf of Englewood Schools, I would like to offer my supp011 for an Arapahoe County Open Space Grant that would provide Gateway Enhancements in Englewood parks. New gateway signs in Englewood parks will enhance the overall image and perception of Englewood. The enhancements to the signs will reflect the transformations and improvements that are taking place within the City of Englewood. The new park signs will also help identify the parks to visitor and resident alike. New park gateway enhancements will convey to the public the pride and dedication that the City has • towards its parks and the community. • We support the City's grant application for the Gateway Enhancements in Englewood parks. Sincerely, Brian Ewe Superinte dent 4101 S. B nnock St. Englewoo , CO 80 I 10 Roscoe Da idson Administration Building • 4101 S. Bannock St. • Englewood, CO 80110 • Phone: 303-761-7050 2015 Standar /Small Grant Application Page 58 of 94 • • • • December 16, 2014 Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Program 6934 S. Lima St. Unit A Centennial, Colorado 80112 Dear Board Members, Advisory Board Members: I am writing this letter of support for the Englewood Department of Park and Recreation's application for grant funds for the Gateway Enhancements. As a citizen of Englewood and a neighbor of Belleview Park, I believe that the Gateway Enhancements in Englewood parks will enhance the overall image and perception of the City Englewood. The upgrades to the signs will reflect the transformations and improvements that are taking place within the City of Englewood . The new park signs will also help identify the parks to visitors and residents alike . New park gateway enhancements will convey to the public the pride and dedication that the City has towards its parks and the community. Thank you for your consideration for this application . Sincerely, Rick Gillit 4985 S. Lipan Drive Englewood, CO 80110 (303) 246-4780 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 59 of 94 December 4, 2014 Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Program 6934 S. Lima St Unit A Centennial, Colorado 80112 Dear Board Members, Englewood Unleashed is a non-profit orgam2abbn which is dcdteated to public education for off- leash dog recreation, site selection, park maintenance and fundraising for the City of Englewood's off leash community. Created in 2004 Englewood Unleashed has been vital in the development of Englewood's first dedicated dog park, Canine Corral ,located in Belleview Park, as well as maintained off-leash privileges at four other Englewood Parks . • Englewood Unleashed continues to work with, ruCI and ass!St the City of Englewood's City Council, Parks and Recreation Commission and Parks and Recreation Department by raising funds and providing volunteer support to tinprove and better maintain the off-leash parks in Englewood, in • which dogs can exercise without leash restraint lh a clean, healthy and safe environment · Our organization has supported the City with funds for dog park signage in the past and fully supports the City of Englewood's application for Arapahoe County grant funds for the Gateway Enhancements. These enhancements will expand access and connectivity to the parks as well as improve the overall image of Englewood Parks and Recreation and the City of Englewood for all citizens and visitors including those of us with pets. Sincerely, President, Englewood Unleashed 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 60 of 94 • • • • December4, 2014 Pirate Youth Sports Laura Sakry, President 4550 S. Galapago St. Englewood, CO 80110 Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Program 6934 S. Lima St. Unit A Centennial, Colorado 80112 Dear Board Members, This letter is written on behalf of Pirate Youth Sports. I am writing this letter in support of the grant application for the Gateway Enhancements for Englewood Parks. Pirate Youth Sports is a non-profit, all volunteer organization that serves the youth of Englewood by providing recreational and competitive sports for boys and girls, first through eighth grade . Pirate Youth Sports utilizes the parks within Englewood for our various sports and feels that new gateway entrance signs would enhance the City of Englewood's image. The new signs would be one of the first things visitors from outside Englewood would see when they arrive at the park for practices or games. The signs would not only help indicate to residents and visitors that they are at the correct park, but would also make an impression about the park that it is maintained and valued by the citizens of Englewood. We support the City of Englewood's application for grant funds for the Gateway Enhancements for parks within the City. Sincerely, A(J(,Ut&t JV/~ Ll~ Sakry, President 0 Pirate Youth Sports 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application . Page 61of94 Part G Attachments -5. Documentation of opposition and responses 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 62 of 94 No opposition or responses to include ,. • • • Part G Attachments -6. Evidence of commitment from funding partners • No funding partner commitment to include • • 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 63 of 94 Part G Attachments -7. Photos Current Park Signage at Belleview Park Current Park Signage at Belleview Park 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 64of94 • • • • • • 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 65 of 94 Current Park Signage at Baker Park Current Park Signage at Emerson Park Current Park Signage at Bates-Logan Park 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 66of94 Current Park Signage at Romans Park • • • ' • • • 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 69 of 94 Current Park Signage at Jason Park Current Park Sign age at Jason Park Current Park Signage at Rotolo Park Current Park Signage at Centennial Park 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 70 of94 • • • • Current Park Signage at Romans Park • • Current Park Signage at Cushing Park 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 67 of 94 Current Park Signage at Cushing Park Current Park Signage at Miller Field 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 68 of 94 • • • • \, :.. Current Park Signage at Centennial Park • • Current Park Signage at Centennial Park 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 71of94 • sign is non-illuminated, aluminum construction on a cast lr concrete base -paint system shall be Matthews acrylic polyurethane graffiti resistant paint color 1: Englewood standard Federal Green (PMS 3425) verify color 2: Matthews "Brushed Aluminum" metallic color 3: Matthews "Warm White" arch is two pieces; roll-formed aluminum skin over internal aluminum structure, as required; weld two pieces together; welds shall not show; paint finish two colors, as shown • ' ~--, ..,~·~ ~ ._.J .... a.. ...... , 1 _,,.. __ _ ' . h .Jwf .~""· ~ Proposed ACOS approved signage design • 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 72of94 struts supporting arch shall be 2 1/2"sq "I" beam profile; paint finish color 2; struts shall slip-fit into arch & into sign cabinet sign cabinet shall be brake-formed with returns on three sides, as shown; paint finish color 1; fasten to internal aluminum structure with counter sunk flat head, vandal-resistant fasteners, equally spaced, as required sign face shall be brake-formed with stepped detail on two edges left & right; returns on three sides, as shown; pa int finish color 3; fasten to internal aluminum structure with counter sunk flat head, vandal-resistant fasteners, equally spaced, as required letters shall be 1/4" thick aluminum plate; paint finish color 1; fasten to sign face with blind, vandal-resistant, mechanical fasteners, as required; typeface : Optima Regular logo medallion shall be roll-formed aluminum skin over internal aluminum structure, as required, to form cylinder that intersects sign cabinet; paint finish color 2; logo plate shall be 1/2" thick aluminum plate; paint finish color 3; logo components shall be 1/4" thick aluminum plate; paint finish color 1; entire logo medallion assembly shall be fastened with blind, vandal-resistant, mechanical fasteners, as required escutcheon where sign meets base shall be brake-formed with returns on three sides, as shown; paint finish color 1; fasten to internal aluminum structure with counter sunk flat head, Neighborhood Community Park E NGL :E~WOO 0 1-,!-I .y,)l"~~.,ni..:r.a.:~---t::K vandal-resistant fasteners , equally spaced, as required base shall be cast concrete with chamfered edge & "visual" finish; "ENGLEWOOD" letters shall be 1/4" recessed into cast concrete; all surfaces of concrete, including recessed letters, shall be visual quality with clean edges & corners; provide 6"w concrete mow strip on four sides of base flush with finished grade provide detailed shop drawing for review prior to fabrication landscaping , structural engineering & footing is by others TACITO OESIGN INC 1743 WAZEE STREET SUITE 325 DENVER, COLORADO 80202 303 .850 .9197 bob @t a c itodes i g n .com w w w .ta c itodesig n .c om GRAPH I C DESIGN WAYFINDING WEB SITE DESIGN SIGNAGE SYSTEM S PACKAGING City of Englewood Department of Parks & Recreation Park Identification Sign 112"=1'-0" Preliminary Design 11.05.12 Design Development 11.15 .12 Final Design 12 .20.12 Add Arapahoe info 11.24.14 Revised 12.01.14 Sheet number 1.0 Alt5a Proposed Landscape Design • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD LARGE PARK SIGN -IRRIGATED Proposed Landscape Design PLAN VIEW 6' • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD LARGE PARK SIGN -NON-IRRIGATED 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 73 of 94 Skyroeket Juniper Feattler Reed Grass Dian thus Mexican Feather Grass Blue Fescue Proposed Landscape Design • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD SMALL PARK SIGN -IRRIGATED • Proposed Landscape Design 12'3' PLAN VIEW _ .. COne11ower D Basket of Gold • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD SMALL PARK SIGN -NON-IRRIGATED 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 74of94 Proposed Landscape Design -~-------· • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD SIGN-NO PLANT MATERIAL 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 75 of 94 DUncan Park City of Englewood, Colorado 2015 Arapahoe County Open Space, Parks, and Trails Grant Application 0 f nglewood Parks Signage Modernization Belleview Park Site Plan Map LEGEND o Sign Locations a Park Boundary Lines January 2015 {' Q 200 400 Feet 600 :~· LL ~ .. .:·-·n ... ·-i ,,. i ' I a - " ~ ... ; D ~~-l ·~~ D . '. ; H:ljYoboril'Q il'optf)Ke\pklll -.Cos15_1i;n_.,..riou1.pdf ~ d. --;. ,,.,.,,. ·; ·1 .0 r---':_..1,_ J .1i ·1· u §~~ -. --· ~ ---~- --' .-2:.t··~-.~-... ~. :.:_~~ ··f~' j _' :,_.~ __ _ 0 D a ~"" • I< f-._ ~ . i -. 1 -~ -~---' ~-1 '.l.,fT'rTT · :1· ~ ~-:.'~-..· -~ -. --. I " . .. ' . ' ~ 1 -, •• • r......,.· • .~,.. . · r. -r . --P~r~~ '~i ~.l ~f t ~ ··., ,l. ~. -~ l f; ~__;,;:. City off nglewood, Colorado 2015 Arapahoe County Open Space, Parks, and Trails Grant Application 0 f nglewood Parks Signage Modernization Miller Field, and Baker, f merson, Bates-Logan, Romans, Jason, and Cushing Parks Site Plan Map LEGEND O Sign Locations a Park Boundary Lines January 2015 {t Q 200 400 Feet 600 City of Englewood, Colorado 2015 Arapahoe County Open Space, Parks, and Trails Grant Application 0 f nglewood Parks Signage Modernization Centennial Park Site Plan Map LEGEND o Sign Locations a Park Boundary Lines January 2015 {' Q 200 400 feet 600 Part G l.\ttachments -9. GIS Shapefile • Included/Submitted in Part G. Attachment 3- Evidence of Property Ownership Page 26 Also included on CD • • 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application _,. ,../Part G Attachments -10. Other-Council Communication 1999 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: October 18, 1999 AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Entry Port Monumentation, District 11 c ii Signage, and Parks Signage INITIATED BY: Department of STAFF SOURCE: Art Scibelli , Business Neighborhood and Business Development Development Coordinator COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTlON: Quality of life, South Broadway Action Plan action item. No previous Council action. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends that Council award the design contract to Tacito Design. BACKGROUND. ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED= Staff interviewed two design consultants for the Entry Port Monumentation. district Signage and Parks Signage contract. Tacito Design has extensive experience designing and constructing public facility signs. Tacito's graphics and designs were more innovative and exciting than those of the competing firm. This consulting contract is about enhancing Englewood's community image and identity within the metro area -letting people know when they have arrived in Englewood. It ties together the commercial corridors, CityCenter, and parks; one community, one identity. It takes into account the design elements that are already well underway, i.e. CityCenter logo, federal green color (similar to Englewood 's new forest green color), banners on South Broadway, ornamental ironwork, colored concrete banding. and median design . It is a design effort that is intended to coordinate common community design e lements. The entry port design proposal includes Identity monuments at four key locations; North and South Broadway and East and West Hampden entry ports . Funding has been requested in the FY 2001 and FY 2002 capital budgets to construct these entry ports . District s ignage will be designed for the four distinct districts along South Broadway. Signage for parks and recreational facilities will be designed concurrently to provide for a unified community design theme throughout Englewood. 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application • • • ---:----· -~-~;-_ _........_..._ Par't G Attachments -10. Other-Request for Proposal-City Entryway Monumentation ----Please refer to Advisory Committee section for evidence of public process/input • REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL CITY ENTRY,VAY MONUl\tIENTATION Purpose The City of Englewood is interested in strengthening community image and heightening aware- ness of Englewood. The selected consultant will assist the City of Englewood in the preparation of design development level Entry Monumentation Concepts (plan, elevation, and details), as well as with public meetings. The Entry Monumentation concepts will be developed in coordi- nation with City staff and citizens and will address topics including potential location, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, the desired image for Englewood, cost, materials, and methods of construction. Approach The selected consultant will attend a series of Work Sessions that include City staff, Design Ad- visory Committee, and residents, as appropriate. The selected consultant will work with the City to generate alternatives for each of four potential locations for evaluation. The alternatives should include visual presentations. The consultant should seek agreement from the City as to • which alternative best reflects the tone, style, and image of the corridor and the City. The monuments will be located at the Englewood/Denver border, the Englewood/Littleton border on Broadway, the Sheridan/Englewood border, and the Denver/Englewood border on Hampden Avenue. It is important that each entry reflect a unique nature reflective of the location and neighborhood, and still project a consistency of style through common design elements and/or materials. All entry ports should be representative of an Englewood image. The Englewood im- age will be developed through discussion with the public, staff, and through review of back- ground materials provided by the City. The consultant should assist the City in seeking community support by leading meetings as ap- propriate, and by sharing ideas and listening carefully to community issues. The consultant should be an experienced environmental graphic designer with five or more demonstrable years of experience with civic projects of this scale. Designer must be able to design, document, and manage a large scale project. Advisory Committee The selected consultant will work with the Ue.sig!h &dYJsocy ;:Qommittee for the project consisting of policy;;makers, represerttative "'-southirBroad wny ,~and,;Hampdetr=Avenueqnerch~nts, residettts-; and GitY"sfaff. This Design Advisory Committee would act as a sounding board and advocacy group to guide the work and to communicate with others in their constituencies . • 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 81of94 Part G Attachments -10. Other-Suggested Scope of Work-City of Englewood Signage Projects 199S- Please refer to section Cl on next page for Parks and Recreation Sign age Suggested Scope of Work A. Entry Port Design: 4 Key Locations (submit separate proposed budget for this activity) 1. Background Review • Review existing information, photos, base maps, background materials pre- pared and gathered by the City; • Review City of Englewood history to assist in creating a design image; • Review information for potential locations for monumentation along the South Broadway and Hampden corridors, characteristics, limitations, and opportuni- ties at the following four specific locations: a) Automotive dealerships. Designer should examine city maps to determine exact city boundary location. b) The Hampden Avenue Sheridan/Englewood border (across from City- Center Englewood). c) The northern South Broadway border of Denver and Englewood at Yale Avenue. d) Hampden Avenue Cherry Hills Village/Englewood border. 2. Public Input • The designer shall conduct a total of six meetings with the entry porUbanner design team. This committee shall have community and corridor representa- tion. • Designer shall discuss issues on potential monumentation locations, principles and objectives for monumentation design, and City image with committee members. • Designer shall create a report documenting principles and objectives for the monumentation. This report should talce the form of a design intent statement, which shall represent an objective list of criteria to which all parties can agree before design begins. The design intent statement should be a vehicle that al- lows the design team to build consensus amongst interested parties. 3. Analysis • Prepare draft concept for monumentation locations identified in Item I above. a) Southern south Broadway Englewood/Littleton Border; 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application •• • • • '®istrict<Signtrg~2;E)esign (submit separate proposed budget for this activity): 1. Conduct field review of four districts on South Broadway: a) North Gateway b) Downtown c) Cherryln d) South Gateway 2. Prepare two design concepts for signs in each of the four districts. 3. Present ideas for siting of the signs in each district, i.e., at beginning and end of each d istrict, etc. C. Parks,,and'i~:ecreation "'Depcart·metff'Signage"(submit separate proposed budget for this ac- tivity): I. Bresent,two ;.desigmaltematives for common use in 12 of the City's parks. Said de- sign alternatives shall be by the Rru:ks ,andRecreation ;1Board and subject to re- finement after review. Parks are as follows: a} Baker b) Bates/Logan c) Belleview d} Centennial -e) Cushing 'fJ Duncan 'g) Emerson ··h) Hosana Athletic Complex i} Jason ,4}, Miller Field k} Romans ,{Jiffi' Rotolo f:\dept\nbd\group\bus\art~. broadw:iy\rfps\entry port monumenution rfp-2 .doc ---~. .-··--....• ~ -._-. ·-.'·--._. .... ..,. ~----· .......... , ...... -...... -----_..., __ '-' '•-z' .,.._ _ _._ -.,...._ -.,_. ..,,...._,. -'" -,_.,......,,-•;<>. /01 r; St;:inrl;:irrl/Sm;:ill (-ir;:int Annlic:;:ition Part G Attachments -10. Other-Tacito Design-Design Intent Statement December 16, 1999 Des ign Intent Statement/ 2nd Draft TACITO DESIGN INC S655 SOUTH YOSEM ITE STR EET SU IT E 201 GREEN WO OD VI LLAGE, COLO RAD O 8011 1 303.850 .931 5 FAX 303 850 .91 97 VO ICE The purpose of this Design Intent Statement is to establish goals and object ives for the City of Englewood Signage projects in a manner which wi ll help to build consensus among interested parties. The Design Intent Statement will be used throughout the design process to verify that the design concepts and final solution successfully meet the needs of the project. These statements are not presented in any particular order. 1. South Broadway shall be the unifying essence of th is project's sign age efforts . 2. Complement existing and/or plann .ed Englewood Streetscape Program . 3. Strengthen community image , unifying all areas under one civic ident ity . 4. Entry Port Monuments shall set the design theme . District signage and parks & recreation signage shall follow suit with a "family resemb lance· to the Entry Port Monuments . 5. Entry Port Monuments shall shall emphas ize city gateways with large, vehicular-scale element(s) that respect the history of the City and acknowledge pedestrians . These four monuments will be similar to one another, yet allow for the differences in each location. 6. District Signage shall identify unique areas within the City of Englewood, calling attention to each area's amenities, past and/or present These signs will be sim ilar to one another, yet allow for the differences in each district 7. Parks and Recreation Signage shall identify and ce l ebrate the presence of City parks and open space, increasing the awareness of vehicular and pedestrian audiences. 201s Standard/sm'all.G r ~~nFApplication Page 84 of 94 ·• • • • Part G Attilchments -10. Other-Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-May 9, 2002 Please ref~r to section V for Park Sign age CITY OF ENGLEWOOD • I. II. III. IV. v. VI. VII . Call to Order PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 9, 2002 Englewood Recreation Center, Adult Activity Room 1155 W. Oxford Avenue 5:30pm AGENDA Approval of Minutes for April 11, 2002 Scheduled Visitors (presentation limited to 10 minutes) Unscheduled Visitors (presentation limited to 5 minutes) Park Signage -Lee and Bob Gnaegy, Tacito Design Recreation Project Bond Update -Black Golf Medal Award-Black • VIII. Golf Course City Administration Fee -Black • IX. x. XI. XII. XIII. XIV. xv. XVI. Water Issues -Black Off-Leash Park Pilot Program Update-Lee Centennial Park Update -Black Cultural Arts Commission Update -Moore City Center Update -Garrett Director's Choice Capital Projects Commission Member's Choice Adjournment Attachments a. Minutes of April 11, 2002 b. c . d. e. f. 2002 Englewood Holiday Parade Memorandum MOA Design and Build Information April 28, 2002 Denver Post Article regarding Golf Courses National Senior Health & Fitness Day Flyer Memorandum from Ben Greene regarding Fires on City Property Please notify Debby Severa at 303-762-2684 by Tuesday, May 7, 2002 if you are unable to attend. "lf'\1 c c+ ....... ....J ....... ...J /c_.. ... 11 r: ......... + 1t ........ 1:-... +:,..- V. PARK SIGNAGE -LEE AND BOB GNAEGY, TACITO DESIGN The meeting was turned over to Dave Lee, Open Space Manager, who introduced Bob Gnaegy ofTacito Design . Gnaegy began discussion on park signage for the City by showing Commission members the four designs under consideration. Gnaegy explained that he had been working with Dave Lee, Austin Gomes, and others from Community Development to create a family of signs for Englewood parks. Gnaegy said that the purpose of the signage is to unify and create attention for the park system . Gnaegy explained that the signs would be double-faced and placed in conspicuous locations in each park. Gnaegy added that there was a range of detail options that could change according to budget. Commission members discussed size, maintenance concerns, etc. Chairperson Gomes asked Gnaegy what the cost would be for the signs. Gnaegy responded that the estimate was $9,000 -$14,000 apiece if purchased six at a time, including installation. Chairperson Gomes asked Lee to tally Commission members' votes for one of the four designs . Design #2 was chosen. Gnaegy told Commission members that a revised design would be presented to Commission again in the future . VI. RECREATION BOND PROJECT UPDATE -BLACK Gary Hultberg, Recreation Manager, announced that the Rec Center and Malley Center parts of the Bond Project were on schedule and on budget. Hultberg said that requests for qualifications had just gone out for the aquatics center, and that construction should begin by February or March of next year. Hultberg added that the aquatics project was expected to be completed by Spring of2004. VII. GOLD MEDAL AW ARD -BLACK Black returned discussion to the Gold Medal Award briefly discussed at the beginning of the meeting. Black said that just to be selected as a finalist for the award was very important, and says a lot about Englewood leadership and staff. Black added that this was the Department's second time as a finalist, the last time being in 1970. Chairperson Gomes asked when the award would be presented. Black replied that the announcement would be made at the National Parks and Recreation Association convention in October. VIII. GOLF COURSE CITY ADMINISTRATION FEE -BLACK Black announced that the Director of Finance Administration had discussed with him asking the Golf Course to pay an administrative fee to the City of$130,000 per year. The Director of Finance Administration suggested raising fees $2 per round to cover the fee. Black and Commission members discussed the importance of keeping the fees low, citing a Denver Post article included in members' packets regarding the current glut of golf courses. Commission member Waldman asked what the administrative fee was for. Black replied that it is to cover services that other departments (Human Resources, City Attorney, etc.) do for the Golf Course. Discussion ensued . Council Member Garrett added that City Council is looking at all enhancements and cutbacks to balance the City's revenue shortfall. Jerrell Black mentioned the possibility of getting the funds from the Golf Course's reserve fund of $600,000, but added that there were numerous other Golf Course projects that have been projected for those funds. The Commission was not in support of raising golf fees or using funds from the Golf Fund balance. Council Member Garrett said he would convey the Board's concerns to City Council. 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 86 of 94 • • • Part~ Attachments -10. Other-Parks and Recreation Comm ission Minutes-October 11, 2012 PleasE! refer to section V for Park Sign age • • • City of Englewood PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Minutes of October 11, 2012 I. Call to Order The regular monthly meeting of the Englewood Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order at 5 :30 p .m . by Chairperson Gomes at the Malley Recreation Center, 3380 S . Lincoln Street. Present: Absent: Also Present: Austin Gomes, Chairperson M itch Waldman , Vice Chairperson Mark Husbands , Commission Member Duane Tucker, Englewood Schools Liaison Donna Schnitzer, Cultural Arts Commission Liaison Jerrell Black , Ex-Officio Douglas Garrett, Commission Member Karen Miller, Commission Member Bob Mccaslin , C ity Council Lia ison Dave Lee , Manager of Open Space Joe Sack, Recreation Manager Bob Spada , Golf Manager Joyce Musgrove , Recreation Program and Facility Supervisor II. Approval of Minutes Chairperson Gomes asked if there were any changes or corrections to the minutes of September 13, 2012. Director Black noted that the location of the meeting was incorrect and should read the Englewood Recreation Center. The minutes were approved as amended. Ill. Scheduled Public Comment There were no scheduled guests. IV. Unscheduled Public Comment v. There were no unscheduled guests . Park Signage Dave Lee , Manager of Open Space, told the Board that in 2002 , new park signage information was brought to the Board for its review and approval. Lee distributed to the boa rd members four examples of park signage that was shown to the Board in 2002. Lee noted that the Board chose option #2 . Lee went on to explain that he wanted to bring forth discussion on the signage aga in because of wanting new signage at Duncan Park when it is developed . Englewood Schools Liaison Duane Tucker asked if there were any other reasons besides aesthetics that Design #2 was chosen . Lee replied no, explaining that the ... ~ . cur.rer.it. sigr.iage is very outdated, dating. back.,t 0-the-.197'0~s . .bee .stated tl:iat-in --.... ----~ --· -_, 2002, the City had decided to move forward with new signage for the four entry points into Englewood but then the economy changed and it was put on the back • burner. Black explained that Community Development had contracted with Tacitio Design to look at signage for the entry points into Englewood so the Department decided to partner with Community Development and have Tacito Design come up with some designs for park signage . Black reported that the Department spent approximately $15,000 for the conceptual designs. Discussion followed. Gomes asked where the new signage would be placed . Lee stated that the new signs would go where the existing park signs are with additional smaller scale signs going in at the secondary entries. Board members were told that the price listed on the information they received is 2002 dollars . Lee told the Board that the purchase of the new signage would be spread out , and not done all at once. Black explained to the Board that they wanted to have the Board look at the signage now so when they start developing Duncan Park , things will be in place. Discussion followed. The question was asked in regard to damage and vandalism to the signs . Black stated that the Department wants to make sure that part replacement is key and anything that is damaged or vandalized can be fixed or replaced. Discussion followed in regard to board members choice for signage . Design #2 was the Board 's preference . A motion was made by Vice Chairperson Waldman and seconded by Commission Member Husband recommending that design option 2 be pursued for park signage for the City of Englewood parks. Ayes: Gomes, Waldman, Husband, Schnitzer, Tucker Nayes: None Motion passed. VI. 2013 Budget Discussion turned to an update on the 2013 budget. Black stated that the 2013 budget will be going to second reading at Monday night's City Council meeting . Board members were told that Council had requested a two percent reduction in 2012 budgets with another two percent reduction going into 2013. Black explained that for Parks and Recreation , the reduction meant the elimination of a full-time Program Administrator position . Black reported that City Council is now requesting another one percent reduction going into 2013 . Board members were told that the additional one percent reduction will mean the elimination of the Youth Program Administrator in addition to all youth programs , impacting approximately 7 ,000 participants . Black reported that at Monday night's City Council work session, Council decided to accept the budget as is without the additional one percent reduction and look at it again in February after holiday sales. Black noted that Council will vote Monday night as part of the second reading. Black told the Board that he needs to iterate that the budget cuts are way beyond a little here and a little there , that it is now into personnel and program cuts . VII. Recreation Update • Recreation Manager Joe Sack gave an update on Department events . In regard to • the Freedom Service Dog's Festival of the Bastardino that was held on Saturday , September 8th in Belleview Park and Pirates Cove, Sack reported that they have · · ·---_.,, reeenUy · met with staff from Freedom Service Dogs for a debriefing ; S·ack passec:I· 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application . . . ...........:.-..~~ ... d~l ~ ~___,~~..:.4,,,.-· ....... ,_ .... ,,,,. ,,.,._.._.~~--~-~-... w-~...:......:~:.='~~~---...L.. .. __ .~...__ .......... _ .... ~ ................ -.--.... ------·--··---~-•. ,_..,. _ _..., ~-..-. .... .........;..,.._..:,.. _ Part G ~ttachments -10. Other-Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-November 15, 2012 Please refer to section VI for Park Signage • • • City of Englewood PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Minutes of November 15, 2012 I. Call to Order The regular monthly meeting of the Englewood Parks and Recreation Comm ission was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Chairperson Gomes at the Broken Tee Englewood Golf Course Maintenance Facil ity at 4000 S . Clay Street. II. Present: Absent: Also Present: Approval of Minutes Austin Gomes , Chairperson Mitch Waldman , Vice Chairperson Douglas Garrett , Commission Member Karen Miller, Commiss ion Member Bob Mccaslin , City Council Liaison Duane Tucker, Englewood Schools Liaison Jerrell Black, Ex-Officio Mark Husbands , Commission Member Schnitzer, Cultural Arts Comm ission Liaison Dave Lee , Manager of Open Space Joe Sack, Recreation Manager Bob Spada , Golf Manager Wayne Niles , Golf Course Superintendent Chairperson Gomes asked if there were any changes or corrections to the minutes of October 11, 2012. There were none. The minutes were approved as presented. Ill. Scheduled Public Comment There were no scheduled guests. IV. Unscheduled Public Comment v. There were no unscheduled guests . Arapahoe County Open Space Grants Recreation Manager Joe Sack told the Board that the Department has received the unfortunate news from GOCO that it was not successful with its grant application for the development of Duncan Park . Sack reported that it was very competitive with forty seven grant applications requesting approximately $11.7 million and only nine grants awarded in the amount of $2.2 million . Sack stated that the Department w ill be contacting GOCO to get feedback on its application and will also be moving forward with its grant application with Arapahoe County Open Space. Discussion followed . A motion was made by Commission Member Douglas Garrett and seconded by Commission Member Karen Miller in support of the -~ Department of Parks and Recreation grant application submittal with Arapahoe County Open Space for the development of Duncan Park. • Ayes: Nayes: Gomes, Waldman, Garrett, Miller, Mccaslin, Tucker None The motion passed. VI. Parks Signage In regard to last month 's discussion on park signage, Open Space Manager Dave Lee reported that he now has five renditions of the sign (Option 2) that the Board had selected . Pictures of the five renditions were distributed to board members for their favorite . Lee explained that the signs are aluminum powder coated with epoxy paint and the letters are epoxied or glued on . Lee also noted that the logos are solid all the way through and the signs are all easily maintained . Vice Chairperson asked if the signs are one or two sided . Lee answered both . Englewood Schools Liaison Duane Tucker asked in regard to prices for the five renditions . Lee replied that they are all the same price . Tucker asked if any of them fit in with existing signage . Lee replied that Option 1 fits in with signage at the Civic Center. Following d iscussion , board members agreed that their preference is Option 1 b with the flattened roof design from option 1 a. VII. Golf Course Restaurant Bob Spada , Golf Manager, informed the Board that the restaurant contract with Jim • Dadiotis , The Grill at Broken Tee , LLC will end on December 31 , 2012 after eight years. Board members were told that the City went out to bid and only one bid was received . Spada noted that the one bid is from a vendor that comes with a lot of experience. Spada stated that they will be going to City Council on December 3 rd for formal approval of the contract and the new vendor will begin on January 1, 2013 . The Board was told that the restaurant will be shut down for the first week to do some maintenance work . Discussion followed in regard to the new owner, Craig Caldwell, and his experience . Waldman asked in regard to Dadiotis . Spada replied that he did not bid . VIII. Centennial Park Cyclo-Cross Race In regard to last month's discussion on the request to hold a cycle-cross event at Centenn ial Park on Thanksgiving Day , Lee reported that the group has decided to hold the race somewhere else . Lee stated that the group has said that they would still like to hold a race at Centennial Park sometime next year. IX. Cultural Arts Commission Update Black reported that the Cultural Arts Commission is currently consideri ng several projects that it can do. X. Director's Choice Black told board members that generally in December a board meeting is not held and if the board agrees , the December meeting will be cancelled . However, Black explained that if any member wants a meeting or has an issued that they feel 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application • Part G .~ttachments -10. Other-Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-January 10, 2013 Please -r,.efer to section V for Park Signage • • • City of Englewood PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Minutes of January 10, 2013 I. Call to Order The regular monthly meeting of the Englewood Parks and Recreation Commiss ion was called to order at 5 :30 p .m . by Vice Chairperson Waldman at the Englewood City Center, City Council Conference Room , 1000 Englewood Parkway. II. Present: Absent: Also Present: Approval of Minutes Mitch Waldman , Vice Chairperson Douglas Garrett , Commission Member Mark Husbands , Commission Member Karen Miller, Commission Member Bob Mccaslin , City Council Liaison (arrived at 5:40pm) Duane Tucker, Englewood Schools Liaison Donna Schnitzer, Cultural Arts Commission Liaison Jerrell Black , Ex-Officio Austin Gomes , Chairperson Dave Lee , Manager of Open Space Joe Sack , Recreation Manager Bob Spada , Golf Manager Jeff Jones , Recreation Program/Facility Supervisor Vice Chairperson Waldman asked if there were any changes or corrections to the minutes of November 8, 2012. There were none. The minutes were approved as presented. Vice Chairperson Waldman asked if there were any changes or corrections to the minutes of December 13, 2012. There were none. The minutes were approved as presented. Ill. Scheduled Public Comment There were no scheduled guests . IV. Unscheduled Public Comment v. There were no unscheduled guests . Park Signage Recreation Manager Dave Lee informed board members that in their packet are examples of park s ignage with the changes that they had recommended at last month 's meeting. Lee told the Board that the first sign in the packet is the Park Identification Sign that will be placed at the main entrance into the park. The second sign is the Small Park Identification Sign that will be placed at secondary entrances to the park. Lee reported that the other signs in the packet are examples of the Rules and Regulations sign and a park reservation information ~·· sign:· -l::ee~pointed out-tl'le-Rules and-Regulatiens sign·will-new-include -a ~QR C0de· . 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application -.• f that will link the customer to the City 's website. Commission Member Mark Husbands asked if park reservations can be made online . Lee stated that at this • time they cannot. Recreation Manager Joe Sack reported that plans are to have online facility reservations in place later in the year. In regard to the park signage , commission members stated that they thought the new signage looked great. VI. Duncan Park Grant Update VII. Before discussion went to an update on the Duncan Park grant applications , Sack introduced Jeff Jones , the new Recreation Program & Facil ity Supervisor for the Englewood Recreation Center and stated that Jeff has been the Adult Sport Recreation Program Administrator for the City of Englewood for the last twenty years. Sack told the Board that the Department is very excited to have Jeff step up into the new position. Jeff told the Board about himself and his new responsibilities . Discussion turned to an update on grant applications for Duncan Park . Lee informed the Board that as they are aware, the Department was unsuccessful with its GOCO grant application in August of last year. Lee reported that he and Sack have been working diligently on an Arapahoe County Open Space grant application that will be due the beginning of February and another grant application for GOCO that is due in early March . Lee explained that they will be requesting $250,000 from Arapahoe County and $350,000 from GOCO. Waldman asked what the Department will do if it is unsuccessful with the grants . Lee replied that they will phase the project. Intergovernmental Agreement/Facility Usage, Englewood Schools Black informed the Board that the Department of Parks and Recreation and Englewood Schools are considering partnering together for an Arapahoe County Open Space grant for a synthetic turf field at Englewood High School. Black explained that a stipulation to all grant applications is that before the grant application can be submitted , all Intergovernmental Agreements need to be in place and finalized so a meeting has been scheduled with Brian Ewert, Englewood Schools Superintendent, to discuss the agreement. Black said that they hope to have the agreement completed in six months. Commission Member Miller asked where the field will be_ Black explained that it is the practice field behind the stadium . Black then stated that they will be losing one of the fields at Hosanna which will result in lost revenue for the City. The Board was told that the School D istrict has been very accommodating , agree i ng that if a field is lost, the City can use the new synthetic turf field to compensate for lost revenue. Black discussed the current Intergovernmental Agreement that is in place between the City and School District and plans to revisit it and condense all City/School IGA agreements for inside and outside facility usage into one agreement. Black stated again that it is their hope to have the agreement in place by mid-year so can they can submit a grant application for 2014 funding. Waldman asked if the Department applies for an Arapahoe County grant for Duncan Park and then the Arapahoe County grant with the School District, will Arapahoe County award both grants. Black stated that he has seen agencies receive two grants though it is more unusual than common . Black said that GOCO will not award more than one grant to an entity per grant cycle while Arapahoe County will award up to two grants to an entity per cycle . 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application • • Part G ,f\ttachments -10. Other-Tacito Design-Total Design Fee Contract Amount __ .... ,, J ' • i ~ T,1Ci10 Dcsig11, Inc, ! 5690 DTC Bouf~v.zrd i S111'1e 220 &st To1~r 1 Engkwood. Colorado 80111 1 303.850.9191 . ! FAX 303.8509315 : ': : : ~ ! ! I Invoke I02095 I July 18. 2002 ! Dave Lee j Parks & Recreation i City of Englewood i 1155 West Oxford Avenue i Englewood, Colorado 80110 I Re: Parks & Recreation Signage • I PO #020187 : i Total design fee contract amount, Parks & Recreation Signage : l : I Fee deposit, 25% of total design fee contract amount, PAID I Work to date, to 80 % completion ! I Color laserpr ints for client coordination I Large format color output & mounting for Parks Commission presentation ! Total due, this invoice I Design lee balance (50 %1 I Payment due August 2, 2002. I Thank you. I Federal Taxpayer • ! Identification Numbe" 841069281 : 2015 Standard/!mall Grant Application Pag~ 93 of 94 SB,525.00 120.00 112.37 $8,757.37 $15,500.00 <:3,875.00> <8,525.00> $3,100.00 Part G Attachments -10. Other-PKM Design Group-Park Signage Graphics Invoice Bill To Dave Lee 7353 S. Alton Way, Su ite 125 Centennial, Colorado 80112 phone 303 .804.0080 fax 303.804.0070 www.pkmdg.com City of Englewood Englewood Rec Cent E! 1155 W. Oxford Ave. Englewood, Colorado 80110 -Item Description Field Review P .Miers -field review with Dave Lee Graphics P .Hendrix -sign graphics for Arapahoe County Grant Make payments to PKM Design Group, Inc. 7353 S. Alton Way. Suite 125, Centennial. CO 80112. -Please-direct-all·billing-questionsio· .:>atricio-Miers·-at- 303.804.0080 or at pkm@pkmdg.com. 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 94 of 94 - .. _ ,I lnvoic6' -- Date Invoice# 12/30/2014 1903 Project . Park Sign Graphics Period Nov/Dec 2014 --' ... •.- Qty , Rate Amount 1 130.00 130.00 26.5 36.80 975.20 1-Total $1, 105.20 • • I • • • COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Date Agenda Item Subject January 20, 2015 Resolution supporting the City's 11 c iii Arapahoe County Open Space grant application for the construction of RiverRun Trailhead Phase I Initiated By Staff Source Department of Parks and Recreation Jerrell Black, Director of Parks and Recreation Joe Sack, Recreation Services Manager COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION Goal A City that provides diverse cultural , recreational and entertainment opportunities Previous Action Council Bill No. 56 , Ordinance No. 50, series of 2014, authorizing an Intergovernmental Agreement regarding the construction of drainage and flood control improvements for South Platte River at Oxford Avenue between the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, the Colorado Water Conservation Board and Arapahoe County by adding the City of Englewood, the City of Sheridan and the South Suburban Parks and Recreation District as participants. Council Bill No. 41 , Ordinan c e No. 38, Series of 2011 , authorizing an Intergovernmental Agreement accepting the 2010 Riverside Park Planning grant between Arapahoe County and the City of Englewood, Colorado. Resolution No. 89 Series of 2010, in support of the City's Arapahoe County Open Space (ACOS) grant application for the Riverside Park Planning grant. RECOMMENDED ACTION Recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Department to approve the resolution supporting the City's grant application to Arapahoe County Open Space for the construction of RiverRun Trailhead Phase I. BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED Council authorized the application for and acceptance of the Riverside Park planning grant in 2011. In 2014 Council authorized an Intergovernmental agreement with Urban Drainage and Flood Control District to complete the design of the site. Urban Drainage Flood Control District (UDFCD) is managing the river corridor project in partnership with City of Englewood, City of Sheridan , South Suburban Parks and Recreation District, Colorado Water Conservation Board and Arapahoe County Open Space as part of the South Platte Working Group. The South Platte Working Group members agreed that the river downstream of Oxford Avenue provided recreational and economic benefits for the entire region and this area was identified as RiverRun Trailhead. The RiverRun Trailhead is a construction project along the South Platte River and Oxford Avenue. The • Trailhead is destined to become a major focal point for bikers using the Mary Carter Greenway Trail as well • as river enthusiasts enjoying kayaking, fishing and swimming. The Trailhead amenities will include a large • park pavilion, playground, restroom facilities, ADA access to the South Platte River and regional t rail access. The RiverRun Trailhead will be completed in multiple phases . Phase 1 -Site Preparation will include removal of existing improvements, erosi o n and sediment control, construction surve y ing, earthwork and stormwater facilities. This grant request is for Phase 1 only. FINANCIAL IMPAC T The City 's Arapahoe C o unty Open Space g rant application will request $300,000 in grant funds with a required City cash matc h of $100,000 (Budgeted-$7 5,000 Arapahoe County Shareback Funds $25 ,000 Conservation Trust Funds). LI ST OF ATTAC HMEN TS Resolution • • • • • RESOLUTION NO . SERIES OF 2015 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S ARAPAHOE COUNTY OPEN SPACE GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RIVERRUN TRAILHEAD PHASE 1 WHEREAS, Council authorized the application and acceptance of the Riverside Park planning grant in 2011 and in 2014 Council authorized an Intergovernmental agreement with Urban Drainage and Flood Control District to complete the design of the site; and WHEREAS, Urban Drainage Flood Control District (UDFCD) is managing the river corridor project in partnership with the City of Englewood, City of Sheridan, South Suburban Parks and Recreation District, Colorado Water Conservation Board and Arapahoe County Open Space as part of the South Platte Working Group; and WHEREAS, The South Platte Working Group members agreed that the river downstream of Oxford A venue provided recreation and economic benefits for the entire region and this area was identified as RiverRun Trailhead; and WHEREAS, the RiverRun Trailhead is a construction project along the South Platte River at Oxford Avenue and is destined to become a major focal point for bikers using the Mary Carter Greenway Trail as well as river enthusiasts enjoying kayaking and fishing ; and WHEREAS , these Trailhead amenities will include a large park pavilion, playground, restroom facilities, and ADA access to the South Platte River and regional trails; and WHEREAS, the RiverRun Trailhead will be completed in multiple phases. Phase 1 -Site Preparation will include removal of existing improvements, erosion and sediment control, construction surveying, earthwork and stormwater facilities; and WHEREAS, the Trailhead will be located on property owned by the City of Englewood next to the Broken Tee Golf Course which is located in the City of Sheridan; and WHEREAS, there are no federal funds being used for the RiverRun Trailhead Phase 1; and WHEREAS, the City's Arapahoe County Open Space grant application will request $300 ,000 in grant funds with a required City cash match of $100,000 which has been budgeted; and WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation will bring back an IGA if approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes the attached application for an Arapahoe County Open Space Grant for the construction of the River Run Trailhead Phase 1. Attached hereto as Exhibit A. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 20th day of January, 2015. ATTEST : Randy P. Penn, Mayor Loucrishia A. Ellis , City Clerk I, Loucrishia A. Ellis , City Clerk for the City of Englewood, Colorado , hereby certify the above is a true copy of Resolution No . __ , Series of 2015. Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk • • • • • • ARAPAHOE COUNTY COLORADO'S FIRST 2015 Standard Grant Grant Proposal Arapahoe County Open Space City of Englewood Parks and Recreation Department RiverRun Trailhead Phase I E x H I B I T A PART A-Application Summary Form TABLE OF CONTENTS Englewood Parks RiverRun Trailhead Phase I PART B-Minimum Qualifications and Eligibility Form PART C-Application Checklist PART D-Project Timeline PART E-Project Budget PART F-Project Details PART G-Attachments 1. Resolution 2. long-term Commitment letter 3. Evidence of Property Ownership 4. Support letters 5. Documentation of opposition and responses 6. Evidence of Commitment from funding partners 7. Photos 8. Site Maps 9. GIS shapefile • Page 1 Page 3 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 13 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 29 • Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 40 Page 43 • • • • 2015 Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Application Part A-Application Summary Form Grant Category (check one): X Standard 0 Small This application will be scored on a 100-point scale by the evaluation committee and must Score a minimum of 75 points. Applicant Information Name: City of Englewood Address: 1155 West Oxford Avenue , Englewood, CO 80110 Primary Contact: Joe Sack I Title: Recreation Services Manager Telephone: 303-762-2682 Email: jsack@englewoodgov.org Primary Partner Information (Additional partners should be discussed in Part F: Project Details, Question 13 of the application.) Name: Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Address: 2480 W. 26t h Ave., Suite 156-B, Denver .C0 .80211 Contact: Laura Kroeger -I Title: Assistant Manager Telephone: 303-455-6277 ~. ' -· -· ·'- ~ -·. -. Email: lkroeger@udfcd.org 1·1 ,, ' t . Partner Responsibilities: River and trail enhancements, designation of location as a trailhead Proj_ect Information Grant Category: Standard Grant ' . - Project Type: Construction Project Project Title: RiverRun Trailhead Phase I Address: 2101 West Oxford Avenue Englewood, CO 80110 City or Unincorporated Arapahoe County: City of Sheridan GPS Coordinates: 39°38'35 .51"N 105°00'51.59"W Grant Request : $300,000.00 Cash Match Total: $100,000 I Percentage of Total Project: 25% Total Project Amount: $400,000 Brief Project Summary {400 words or less): project description, components, need, goa!, beneficiary. planning, cornrrn.mity input, resuks The RiverRun Trail head is a construction project along the South Platte River and Oxford Avenue. The Trailhead is a park-like setting which will include a large park pavilion, playground, restroom facilities, ADA access to the South Platte River and regional trail access. This location is destined to become a major focal point for bikers using the Mary Carter Greenway Trail as well as river enthusiasts enjoying kayaking, fishing and swimming. The RiverRun Trailhead will be completed in multiple phases . Phase 1 -Site preparation will include removal of ex i sting improvements, erosion and sediment control, construction surveying, earthwork and stormwater facilities. This grant request is for Phase_ 1 on_ly. The 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 1of43 proposed trailhead footprint includes existing improvements such as asphalt, concrete curb/sidewalk, landscape plantings, water lines, stormwater infrastructure, and light poles/electrical system, all of which must be removed. Erosion and sediment control "Best Management Practices" (BMPs) will be installed to protect against soil erosion and sediment laden water leaving the trail head site during construction. BMPs will include silt fence, stabilization of staging areas, vehicle tracking control, sediment logs, and inlet protection. Construction surveying will be completed to establish proposed grades for earthwork and layout of the stormwater system. The proposed trail head will significantly lower the existing grade to allow ADA accessibility and connections to the river and planned regional trail. Earthwork will include excavation and fill on-site and excavation and haul off-site . Existing topsoil will be stripped and stockpiled for reuse in later phases. Constructed stormwater facilities will capture, detain, treat and discharge to the South Platte River. Facilities will include an inlet in the parking lot, piping to a detention pond, a sand filter with an underdrain system, outlet structure from the pond, and outfall piping and embankment armoring in river. The Trailhead is a part of the larger South Platte River/RiverRun Trail project, which extends from Union Avenue to Oxford Avenue . The partnered project between the cities of Englewood, Sheridan and Littleton and other organizations including South Suburban Parks and Recreation District, Urban Drainage and Flood Control and the Colorado Water and Conservation Board will enhance the South Platte corridor as a recreational resource for the entire region. The river- oriented project will provide eastside and westside trails, improved river access and in-river enhancements while restoring and revitalizing the river and its habitat. 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 2 of 43 • • • • • • Part B -Minimum Qualification and Eligibility Form Certify the below minimum qualifications and eligibility criteria: Applicant Name: City of Englewood Application Category and Type: Standard Grant, Construction Project Project Name: RiverRun Trailhead Phase I Briefly answer the following qualification questions: 1. Is applicant in good standing with Arapahoe County Open Space? Discuss past performance (past five years); discuss all on-going Arapahoe County Open Space Grants, and the number and types of grants for which your agency is applying in this cycle. The City of Englewood is in good standing with Arapahoe County Open Space. Over the past 5 years, Englewood has received 6 grants. All grants have been completed within the allotted time frame. The City of Englewood is in good standing with Arapahoe County Open Space. Over the past 5 years, Englewood has received 6 grants. All grants have been completed within the allotted time frame. The one exception is the Riverside Planning Grant, which expanded in project scope due to a major project sponsored by Urban Drainage and Flood Control and South Platte Working Group. The project encompasses an area from Union Avenue and the South Platte River to Oxford Avenue and the South Platte River. Englewood currently has 2 on-going grants (Hosanna Synthetic Turf Field and Duncan Park Redevelopment). Both grants are in the final stages of completion with final reports pending. , Englewood will apply for 2 -stanclard grants this cycle. The grants are for RiverRun Trailhead Phase I (Construction Project) and Park Gateway Enhancements (Site Improvement). 2. Discuss project alignment with the Arapahoe County Open Space Master Plan; local adopted Master Plan; or other approved planning documents. The Open Space Master Plan provides a 100-year vision, 25-year master plan and 5-year action plan for implementing the purpose and goals of the program. The vision states that the County will be forward thinking, understand and embrace the open space, park and trail needs of current residents, and define a harmonious relationship between people and nature in the County for future generations. The vision for the Program is summarized as: Healthy Lands, Healthy Communities, and Healthy People. The RiverRun Trail head project defines the mission of the Arapahoe County Open Space Plan . 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 3 of 43 • Acquire, conserve and protect open space -The RiverRun Trailhead project will develop this underutilized space into a park area with access to the South Platte River. • Build county open space parks and trails -With the completion of this park the location will be preserved as a permanent park to provide green space for this underserved neighborhood of residents in Arapahoe County. • Plan countywide trails network: This project is destined to become a trailhead to the Mary Carter Greenway Regional Trail system with both east and west side river access. • Cooperative partnership work -Through this project many partnerships were developed or enhanced . The partnered project between the cities of Englewood, Sheridan and Littleton and other organizations including South Platte Working Group, South Suburban Parks and Recreation District, Urban Drainage and Flood Control and the Colorado Water and Conservation Board, area businesses and neighbors have pledged to develop this park space. • Leverage funding for open space, parks and trails -The RiverRun Trailhead project has leveraged a number of funding sources including ACOS Grant Funds, Shareback Funds, Conservation Trust Funds and City of Englewood General Funds . The trail project overall has financial support from Urban Drainage and Flood Control, Colorado Water and Conservation Board, City of Sheridan and other South Platte Working Group members. 3 . Describe how this project addresses specific objectives in the County Open Space Resolution #030381/#110637. Document is posted on the Open Space Grant Program page of the County Website. The RiverRun Trail head project specifically addresses the following objectives of the County Open Space Resolution #030381/#110637. • Preserve urban and rural open space and natural areas -This project will preserve this area as a park to be used by all current and future residents of Arapahoe County. • Protect lands that preserve water quality in rivers, lakes and streams -The RiverRun Trailhead and Trail Project have been specifically designed to protect the South Platte water resource. This project will save this area from commercial or other types of development. • Provide, maintain and improve neighborhood parks, open space, sports fields, picnic facilities and biking, walking and multi-use trails. The development of the RiverRun Trail head fills the fundamental basic need of providing park and open space. The RiverRun Trailhead will provide park area, playground, pavilion, restroom facilities, trail and river access . Improvements made by this project will enhance the outdoor experience while encouraging youth and their families to spend more time outdoors in their community. • Protect wildlife habitat and corridors -The RiverRun trail project calls for the channelization of the river which will improve water flow and water conditions. These changes are expected to improve the stagnate fish habitat in the South Platte 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 4 of 43 • • • • • • River. The improved trail access on both sides of the river will ensure that the river corridor will remain protected . Acknowledge the minimum qualification components listed below. All components are required to meet minimum qualifications: ./ All items on the enclosed application checklist are included in the application ./ All questions are answered in Part F and all supporting documents are attached in Part G ./ All budget forms are attached, completed and signed by the agency's highest authority ./ Application format and document order follow instructions ./ Above eligibility and qualification questions are answered and meet Arapahoe County Open Space eligibility requirements ./ All required forms are signed by agency's highest authority ./ Minimum cash match requirement met (%of total project) Date: /-=.r-.a- 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 5 of 43 Project Title: River Run Trailhead Phase I Part B -Minimum Qualification and Eligibility Form (cont'd) For Arapahoe County Use Only: Initial Review Date (pre-qualification):----------------- • Minimum Qualifications Met (yes/no)? • Past Performance and Status: eligible for funding, probationary status necessary (e.g. special award terms or funding conditions}, or ineligible: • Application Contents, Formatting and Overall Presentation: Grant Program Administrator Signature:---------------- Final Review Date (after evaluation):---~--,;;__--'--------- • Minimum Score Met After Evaluation: • Final Ranking and Recommendation After Evaluation: • Comments: Grant Program Administrator Signature:---------------- 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 6 of 43 • • • • • • Part C -Application Checklist Use the application checklist to verify that all of the required documents are included in this application in the order listed below. All sections are required to meet minimum qualifications . ./ Part A -Application Summary Form ./ Part B-Minimum Qualifications and Eligibility Form (must be signed) ./ Part C -Application Checklist (must be signed) ./ Part 0-Project Timeline ./ Part E -Project Budget Narrative and Forms (all forms must be completely filled out and signed) ./ Part F-Project Details (narrative response to project questions) ./ Part G -Attachments (identify each attachment with the table of contents cover page and list attachments in the following order) 1. Evidence of support from highest authority (official letter or resolution)- including commitment to complete the project; statement that matching funds are secured; and certification that the project will be open to the public or serve a public purpose upon completion 2. Evidence of commitment to long-term maintenance (official letter or resolution) 3. Evidence of property ownershipll~l ·a·~ss (legal documentation) 4. Evidence of communit~~ppbf:e(letters 6flsupport-maximum of 5) 5. Documentation of opP.qsltio '8nd resJ?onse\(if applicable) 6. Evidence of commitm 'ii .. rom fi nding gartners (cash match/in-kind match support letters) 7. Photos (pre-submittal) 8. Site maps (project locatio ·ps) 9. GIS shapefile, if applicable (inc uHe on compact disc) 10. Other (clearly title: acquisition documentation, if applicable, or other supporting documents) Applicant certifies that all of the above items are included in the application, in the order listed above, and that all information submitted is true to the best of their knowledge. Date: ,/--$?-/$- 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 7 of 43 Part D -Project Timeline (5 points) Use the below project timeline sample as a guide to complete your proposed project timeline . Project timeline must be realistic to receive full points. Task Jun Jul Sep 2015 2015 2015 Grant Notification IGASigned Construction Contract completed Construction - Phase I Begin Erosion Sediment Control Established Demolition and Site Preparation Construction Surveying Earthwork and Site Grading Stormwater Detention Construction Final Report 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 8 of 43 Oct Nov Dec Jan Mar Sep Nov Jan 2015 2015 2015 2016 2016 2016 2016 2017 .... • • • • • • Part E -Project Budget Narrative and Forms (10 points) Budget Narrative: Provide a clear and concise budget narrative for this project (250 words or less). The RiverRun Trailhead will be completed in multiple phases. Phase 1-Site preparation will include removal of existing improvements, erosion and sediment control, construction surveying, earthwork and stormwater facilities. Demolition and site preparation will cost $60,000. Erosion and sediment control is budgeted at $10,000. Construction surveying will cost $10,000 and will be completed to establish proposed grades for earthwork and layout of the stormwater system. The Trail head will require significant earthwork to lower the existing grade to allow ADA accessibility and connections to the river and planned regional trail. Earthwork will include excavation and fill on-site and excavation and haul off-site which will cost $240,000. Phase I construction will also include the construction of stormwater facilities for $80,000. Budget Forms: All project budget forms must be completely filled out following the rules and regulations set forth in the application guidelines and instructions. Each budget form must be signed by the highest authority in your agency and included in this section of the application . The following project budget forms are attached and required to be complete and includ~d in the application to meet minimum qual ifications : • Summary Budget Form: The summary budget form must be fully completed and successfully match up with the budget narrative, the grant budget form , the match budget form and the selection criteria questions . • Grant Budget Form: The grant budget form must be completed with sufficient detail to be accepted . Please reference the sample budget for the expected level of detail. Budget items are to be broken down into categories, and then broken down into the detailed use of funds within each category by line item and cost . • Match Budget Form: The match budget form must be completed with sufficient detail to be accepted . Please reference the sample budget for the expected level of detail. Budget items are to be broken down into categories, and then broken down into the detailed use of funds within each category by line item and cost. The match budget form includes cash match and in- kind match . Only cash match counts toward the percentage of match required . The cash match requirement is 25% of the total project amount for Standard Grants and 10% of the total project cost for Small Grants. In -kind match is significant and shows partnership and community support for the project. Administrative costs to prepare the grant application are not an eligible expense . 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 9 of 43 "'C N Q) 0 OQ ..... ro (.11 .... V'l 0 ...... Q) 0 ::l ..... 0. .i::. Q) w..., 0. -V'l 3 QJ G') ..., Ill ::l ...... )> "'C "'C n· QJ !:::!". 0 ::l Part E -Slll'm ma rv Bu dget Form Sour-c::es of Funds Dat.e Secur-ed County Grant Cas.11 Mat ch ln-K"md Mat ch Request Arapahoe Cou nl!.y Open Sp.ace $300.000 ~plical!lt m amhi 111/201'5 $100.000 Othli!lr fun.d i ~ !i.auroe Other fund ing source l"otal Project Cost .$30.0,000 $100,000 $0 . . 11![1ii*~~~~l~~ ~~1~~~:.{~~'J;;::,:-.;~, i ;.~ ·~· :; '" . ::.~·~:~=·~·~::~ ·;:~: 7r~~·~~·.:-.. _· > -: .~ . .·t ~ i-,,..,,.. .. . \ Requl.nMMnts.: • A p p 1i c anl: City of E!n~ewoo Sign3ture:c;f x:. s.5acfi::. Dat .. 7/; a I / 5 • T.-.JPr¥.rt:Amowrt lrt-ftind Matdl: Total/iPllljieGt w/aut fl'P'"ldnd: CmhMatrhhm!rrhge R~m!: Reqlllifed.C'asll Afau:ft Amowrt: Pt:ujectCmh Matm Project "liitle: Rive rRun Tra i lh ead \P ila Year: Mame a11d Title: ..:Joe S3Ck $400,000.00 $0.00 $400,000.00 25.0 S100.ooo.oo Recreation Setvices Manager $100,.000.00 Minimum M et: Y or N • Totlm Project IF-und s $300.()00 $100.CJOD $4] ${) $400,00D -- ZD15 ------- • "'C N DJ 0 (TQ f-.> ro \J1 .... Vl .......... DJ 0 ::J _,., a.. .i::o DJ w ., a.. -Vl 3 DJ G) ., DJ ::J ...... )> -0 -0 n· DJ ...... a· ::J • • • Part E -Grant Budget form/Use of Funds Category Detailed Use of Funds per Category Erosion Sediment ControS Silt fence, stabilized staging area , sediment control logs, Inlet protection Clearing and grubbing, tree/shrub removal , tree Demolition & Sife Preparation protection, Sawcut/removal asphalt, demoHlion of concrete sldewa !k/curb , removal of light poles, removal of stromwater inf els/piping . Earthwork & Site Grading Excavate & stockpile topsoil, earthwork-fill on site, earthwork hau l off site. Construction Surveying Construction survey staking, grade control, projecl limits, and layout Stormwater inl'et structure & piping from parking lot Stormwater Detenoon !detention pond, sand filter system, outlet structure !Outfall lo river, outfall/bank annoring Applicant: City ofEnr;lewood Signature: 292 ~ , 5 ~ Date: / /;~ //S- Grant Request Amount $10,000 $10,000 $35,000 $35,000 $165,000 $165,000 $10,000 $10,000 $80,llOO .OO $80,000 $300,000 Project Title: RiverRun Trail head Ph ase I N.mne and Title: .Joe Sae k ~~~~~~~~~- Ree re at f on Service s Manager ""ON OJ 0 Otl ..... <D lJ'1 .... V'l N .-+ OJ 0 :::J -a. .i::. OJ w ., a. -V'l 3 OJ G) ., OJ :::J .-+ )> "O "O n OJ .-+ 5 · ::::> • Part E -Ma t ch Budget Fo rm /Cash a nd In -kin d Category De.tailed Use of F unds per Category Clearing a nd ,g;rubbin g~ ttree'sh ru b r emoval. tree p rotection, SavtcUtlremo .. •lll Demo1ition & Site Prepa ratiun a sphalt, d e m oJition of conc~e side\\1a lk/curb. removal ot li ght poles. remova1 of s1n::lcmw.aeer r.n lets11'piping. Excavate & stootpil e topsoil. Ea ramvom & sae Gradl.nQ' e arthwcr'k.-fill on site. earthwork haul off site. Applic.ant: city of En-gJevroo d Signature: 9r;Y-e S~ Date: ///.:J, //S- •• Sa:urce of Mat,ch Cash In -kind Tobd Amount Conse rvation Trust F und $25,000 $25 l!O!J ACOS $75,000 $75.(JO!J Shareback T o tal $1 0 0,000 $0 $1 (tD,OO D Project l rtle: Rive rRun Tra i lh ea d Phase I N ;ai m e a nd T i tle: Joe Sack. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Recreation S ervic:.es Manager • • • • Part F -Project Details (75 points) Applicants must respond to all of the following questions to meet minimum qualifications. This section is worth 75 points. Applicants must limit this section to 10 pages and answer all questions to meet minimum qualifications. If attachments/supporting documentation apply to a question answer please fully answer the question and reference the document in Part G. Please do not answer a question as "N/ A". If a question is not applicable, please explain why it is not applicable to be considered for the full amount of points. Select the Grant Category: X Standard Grant: $50,100 -$300,000 funding opportunity, 25% of total project amount minimum cash match requirement D Small Grant: $100-$50,000 funding opportunity, 10% of total project amount minimum cash match requirement Select the Project Type: Project Type/Project Details: The project categories for the standard and small grant applications are below: 0 Trail Project: Projects that are mostly trail construction or renovation/restoration, trail- related bridges, trail-related road crossings, or trail head parking and shelters. 0 Site Improvement Projects: Projects for site improvement, restoration and repair/replacement including: natural re-vegetation/restoration, park improvements, restoration, repair/replacement (may include playgrounds, shelters, sport fields, landscaping). This category may include interior trail segments or connections, but the majority of the project should be site improvements other than trail. X Construction Project: Construction projects may include new park amenities such as playgrounds, shelters, sport fields, restrooms, and interior trails or connections. 0 Acquisition Project (standard grant only): Eligible projects involve fee simple acquisition of land for public open space, park or trails; acquisition of buffer land; acquisition of a conservation easement and/or acquisition of water rights. 0 Environmental Project/Cultural Education or Interpretation Project: Projects focused on environmental or cultural education/interpretation installations may include associated sign bases, panels, landscaping, benches and shelters. D Other Project: Other allowable project categories include: stream-related projects, wildlife habitat, and water quality. These projects should not fit into any of the other project categories. Please contact the County Grant Administrator for questions related to allowable projects. Selection Criteria Questions (75 points): 1. Describe the project goal, extent of scope and expected results. Be specific; discuss what the project will provide, quantities, size, project elements, useful life of project components, and deliverables. Discuss the current condition of the project site and what improvements or changes are being proposed and why. Provide detailed maps and photos in Part G. Describe how the project will be designed, constructed and 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 13 of 43 managed and how you will choose vendors, materials, systems, etc. Describe how this project improves access and connectivity to any existing trail network, natural resources, and/or community resources. If this is an educational project, discuss the long term educational outcomes expected as a result of this project and how the project connects people to each other, the natural environment and/or community resources. Complete the budget form in Part E consistent with this narrative (15 points) The RiverRun Trailhead is part of a major river corridor improvement project in and along the South Platte River adjacent to the trailhead site. Urban Drainage Flood Control District (UDFCD) is managing the river corridor project in partnership with City of Englewood, City of Sheridan, South Suburban Parks and Recreation District, Colorado Water Conservation Board, the South Platte Working Group and Arapahoe County Open Space. The overall project includes a mile of regional trail along the east bank of the South Platte River, recreational and habitat enhancements in the river, access to the river, parking lot improvements at Oxford Avenue on the west bank, and upland park amenities. The Trail head is an integrated component of the overall river corridor project. The existing site is underused. Currently a majority of the trail head site is an existing asphalt park i ng lot, turf areas, and native areas. The parking lot is too steep to meet ADA requirements and stormwater facilities are undersized and do not meet current standards. Existing grades create a hjgh area that blocks views and access to the South Platte River. The Trailhead is a 4 acre multi-purpose project with goals to engage the South Platte River, expand access to the Mary Carter Greenway Regional Trail system and provide a destination for trail users and the surrounding communities to recreate, relax or host an event. It will result in a unique user experience unlike anything else in the Englewood park system or along the greenway trail. The proposed trailhead will include: • Integration with existing and proposed regional trails -plaza and access points • Shelter structure, 200-250 person capacity (pre-fabricated type) • Increase parking capacity -199 parking stalls including 4 ADA accessible stalls (1.75/ acre) • Playground -natural play theme • Restroom (pre-fabricated type) -three toilets for men and women • Landscaping & Irrigation • River access from trailhead • Stormwater facilities that meet current standards -capture, detention, treatment and conveyance The Trail head will be built in phases . This grant request is for Phase 1-Site Preparation. Site preparation will include removal of existing improvements, erosion and sediment control, construction surveying, earthwork and stormwater facilities . The following is a summary of each category proposed in Phase 1: 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 14of43 • • • • • • • Erosion Sediment Control -Silt fence, stabilized staging area, sediment control logs, Inlet protection: Disturbed area= 3 acres • Demolition & Site Preparation -Clearing and grubbing (2 acres), tree/shrub removal, tree protection, Sawcut/removal asphalt {6500 square yards), demolition of concrete sidewalk/curb (500 linear feet), removal of light poles (4 poles), removal of stormwater inlets/piping (425 linear feet) • Earthwork & Site Grading -Excavate & stockpile topsoil (1900 cubic yards), earthwork-fill on site {3000 cubic yards), earthwork-haul off site (13,000 cubic yards) • Construction Surveying -Construction staking, grade control, project limits and layout • Stormwater Detention -Stormwater inlet structure ((1) Type R) & piping (24" pipe/ 25 linear feet) from parking lot, detention pond, sand filter system (filter media/perforated ABS underdrain), outlet structure (custom reinforced concrete). Design life of concrete p i pe and structures is 50 years, detention pond and filter system design life is 25 years with ongoing maintenance and replacement of filter media. The Trailhead is currently under design by Mclaughlin Whitewater Design Group (Civil Engineer) and DHM Design (Landscape Architect). 75% design drawings were completed in August 2014. Final Design will be completed by May 2015. Naranjo Civil Contractors has been selected through the Urban D;rainage and Flood Control District's Project Partners Program. This program selects contractors from the District's pre- qualified contractors list . There are ~everal advantages to collaborating and engaging with the contractor during planning and design. Cost estimates are more accurate because they have been prepared by Naranjo who is building the project. Value engineering is completed during the design process by centractor feedback on constructability of designs and materials specified. Lastly, the contractor better understands the project goals and objectives by being involved with planning and design. Once the design is completed a construction contract will be negotiated with Naranjo to build the project. 2. Describe the community/neighborhood and user groups the project will serve. Discuss the type of users (children, adults, seniors, families, sports leagues, youth groups, etc.) the project will serve and estimate the number of user groups annually that will benefit from the project. How did you arrive at this estimate? Describe the service area for this project (how far will users travel to use the project site). (5 points) The RiverRun Trailhead serves as part of a regional trail and recreational amenity for users along the South Platte River and the Mary Carter Greenway Regional Trail system. Cyclists, joggers, rollerbladers, kayakers, walkers, fishermen and wildlife viewers of all ages utilize the trail system on a daily basis. It is estimated from a visual inspection of the existing trail that tens of thousands of individuals and groups use this trail and will 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 15of43 benefit from a new trailhead annually. As this trail is a regional draw for cycling and kayaking, the service area for users is estimated to be a radius of 20 miles or more. 3. Describe any scenic, historic or cultural values associated with this project. Will they be preserved or restored? Describe specific natural resources at the site, including habitat and/or water. List predominant wildlife species and vegetation on site. Discuss impacts to these resources as a result of this project. If this is a conservation easement acquisition project, describe the conservation values and public benefits/value of the land, easement or water resource . (5 points) There are no historic or cultural values associated with the RiverRun Trailhead Development (Phase I). However, the site contains some scenic values associated with being adjacent to the South Platte River. The river was channelized through this section by the US Army Corps of Engineers to prevent major flooding events. This project aims to improve the scenic value of the property by enhancing views to the river from the trailhead. The site is an important riparian corridor link from being situated along the Platte River. There are native and non-native tree species (cottonwood, Siberian elm, ash and catalpa) which were planted as part of the Broken Tee Golf Course and a river beautification project back in the late 1980's. The habitat value would be categorized as medium . Many birds and animals migrate up and down along the Platte River. Typical bird species include many species of ducks, blue heron, sparrows, robins, finch, geese, etc . Animal species include beaver, fox, deer, coyote, skunk, rabbit, etc . Vegetation on • the site includes irrigated bluegrass, dryland grasses and many broad leaf weedy plants • associated with disturbed soils. Impacts to the natural resources are considered to be low. Riparian access for movement up and down the river will not be adversely affected as new trees, boulders and landscaping will be added to the site. 4. Discuss the ownership and legal access to the proposed project site, including right of access without trespassing on adjacent property. Detail any third-party rights, easements or other encumbrances that exist . Provide supporting documentation proving ownership, legal access or permission from landowner and a site map in Part G. (3 points) The parcel of property located at 2101 West Oxford Avenue, Englewood, Colorado, is located in the City of Sheridan. The City of Englewood is the sole owner of this parcel and the adjacent parcel known a Broken Tee Golf Course. Vehicle access to the RiverRun Trailhead will be provided by the current entrance used by the Golf Course. No third party rights, easements or other encumbrances will affect this project. Arapahoe County parcel search ownership verification is located in Part G. 5 . Describe long-term maintenance of the project site. Estimate the annual costs to maintain the site, how those numbers were calculated, how you intend to fund maintenance and who is responsible for maintenance. Explain how maintaining this project site changes your agency maintenance budget. (Provide projected budget 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 16of43 • • • • changes, detailed cost estimates, how you plan to accommodate these changes, and explain how you arrived at those numbers.) Provide a commitment letter from the management/maintenance agency addressing long-term maintenance and include budgeting for funding maintenance in Part G. (7 points) The City of Englewood owns all park property and the Parks and Recreation Department will be responsible for the long-term maintenance of every park including all landscaping, structures, trails and playground equipment for the project. The City of Englewood annually allocates funding in the Parks and Recreation Department budget for personnel, commodities and capital for regular repair and maintenance for all park infrastructures, amenities and facilities. The 2015 Parks Division Maintenance Budget is $2,137,252. The Parks Department currently maintains approximately 250 acres of parkland, open space and green space and infrastructure. Phase I of this project will not require additional budgeting for funding maintenance costs because this project consists mainly of earthwork. When the Trail head is completed with all listed amenities, it is expected that an additional $16,465 will be added to the Parks Division Maintenance-budget for labor, irrigation, restroom/shelter maintenance, snow and trash r emoval, tree and turf maintenance. 6. Summarize planning efforts to date and investments made prior to submitting a grant proposal. Discuss pre-submittal meet,ings, dates anti outcomes. Be detailed and include eligible pre-planning costs on the Match Budget Form in Part E. See application instructions for details. Proof of pre-submittal planning expenses must be submitted as an attachment in Part G. All attachments should be clearly labeled on the Part G cover page. (5 points) In 2011, the City of Englewood was awarded a $50,000 planning grant from Arapahoe County Open Space with a total project cost of $134,600, for Riverside Park Planning. Shortly following the grant award, the City of Englewood was contacted by Urban Drainage Flood Control District (UDFCD). UDFCD had identified the river corridor from Union Avenue to Oxford Avenue for potential improvements. As discussions unfolded of related projects along the South Platte River, Riverside soon became RiverRun and designated as the Trail head of this project. This process prompted the re-establishment of the South Platte Working Group. Partners of the South Platte Working Group include the City of Englewood, City of Sheridan, City of Littleton, South Suburban Parks and Recreation District, UDFCD, Co l orado Water Conservation Board and Arapahoe County Open Space. In 2012, the planning grant was put on hold and a grant extension was awarded until the South Platte Working Group could provide direction and long range plans for the river corridor. The South Platte Working Group began meeting monthly to create a vision for improvements along the river . 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 17of43 By 2013, the vision started to take shape and the City of Englewood contracted with UDFCD to create the design of RiverRun Trailhead. UDFCD working with Mclaughlin Whitewater Design Group and OHM Design will complete final design by May 2015, currently with 75% of the design work completed and vetted through the South Platte Working Group. 7. Is this project "shovel ready"? Provide evidence that this project will be completed within two years. Is design and engineering complete or is there still work to be done? List any permits that will need to be obtained for implementation of the project and existing status of obtaining those permits. (Federal 404, County or City Planning or Public Works, Storm Water Drainage, etc). Does the project necessitate a change in zoning? Itemize anticipated costs for permits, government fees and consultants. Detail costs in the correct Part E Budget Form. Correlate response with the Project Timeline in Part D. Project timeline must be realistic to receive full points for this question . If this is an acquisition project, list the due diligence items you already have available or will pursue (such as purchase agreement, preliminary title work, appraisal, environmental site assessment, survey, etc). Purchase agreement or option with seller and preliminary title work should be secured and included in the application and attached in Part G. Include detailed costs in Part E. (5 points) Mclaughlin Whitewater Design Group and OHM Design are currently working on Final Design. 75% design was completed in At1gust 2014 .. The design team and the City of • Englewood have engaged the City of Sheridan in review of preliminary design drawings. • A contractor (Naranjo Civil Constructors) has been selected through the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District's Project Partners Program. The project timeline presented in Part D has been prepared with input from Naranjo. The Trailhead will be built as part of the overall river corridor .project. Construction ofriver improvements will start in fall of 2015. Phase 1-Site Preparation will start in fall of 2015 and be completed by spring 2017. Permits will be required to build the trailhead. The City and design team have conducted a review meeting with the City of Sheridan. The following are permits that are required: • Access & Right-of-Way Permit -City of Sheridan • Grading Permit -City of Sheridan • Stormwater/Erosion Sediment Control -State of Colorado/City of Sheridan • Building & Lighting-City of Sheridan The City of Sheridan has requested that the Design Team wait to submit for permits to build the project within 12 months prior to construction . Permit applications will be completed at this time. No zoning changes are required. 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 18 of 43 • • • • 8. Describe the planning process that identified this specific project as a priority. Is this project listed as a priority in a master plan, site specific plan or other adopted planning document? If so, discuss that plan. Describe the relationship of the project to any local, regional, state or system-wide master plan. Give the name of each plan and list related element(s) within the plan. Was this project identified through an independent community planning process? Describe this process. (5 points) Preserving open space and native areas, enhancing trail access, adding trail users and creating recreational opportunities are the objectives of the RiverRun Trailhead project. In 2006, Englewood Parks and Recreation Master Plan supported acquisition and development of open space and areas that improved or increased connection to the Mary Carter Greenway Trail. The Master Plan further identified this property as an opportunity to become a trailhead as well as meet the needs for additional outdoor gathering spaces in the community plus offer an excellent opportunity to access the South Platte River. Englewood Parks and Recreation Department's pavilions are reserved over 82% of the usable dates and large group request~ typically are not accommodated due to the lack of enough large picnic pavilions in the area . This project will provide additional picnic pavilion space and a playground as well as create a dynamic access point to the South Platte River. The water recreati9nal opportunities will be dramatically increased with the paved ADA access to the river, Users can observe wildlife, fish, wade, swim and kayak in an area that has seen little use. This location with restroom and parking facilities will accommodate the many Mary Carter Greenway Trail users. In 2011, Arapahoe County Open Space awarded a $50,000 planning grant recognizing the need for the future development of this site. Planning for the Trail head became the focus of the South Platte Working Group as they developed the vision of the South Platte River corridor. With the planning grant completed in 2014, the trailhead project is ready to begin. 9. Discuss any efforts to obtain public input, disseminate public information, develop partnerships, develop partnerships for cash finding or in-kind contributions, and garner community support specifically related to this project. In most cases, evidence of a transparent public process will be required. For acquisitions, the process may be tied to a public process for an overall master plan rather than identification of a specific parcel. For regional trails, the process may need to include notification and/or involvement of residents from adjacent jurisdictions. Discuss any objections or opposition to this project. Include any letters, petitions, news articles, or other documents evidencing opposition. What has been done to address concerns and how has the opposition responded? (5 points) In 2013, the South Platte Working Group was re-established during a visioning charrette for the South Platte River which included local municipalities, special interest groups, community leaders, property owners and other stakeholders. The South Platte Working 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 19of43 Group recommitted to preserving and protecting the river corridor as a community asset and to enhance the quality of life in Arapahoe County through the ongoing collaborative process to enhance the natural environment, economic benefits and recreational features of the South Platte River. The South Platte Working Group members agreed that the river downstream of Oxford Avenue provided recreational and economic benefits for the entire region and this area was identified as the trailhead. Urban Drainage Flood Control District began managing the Trailhead and river projects. Preliminary designs were created and presented to the South Platte Working Group. With revisions completed, the public process was established by first taking the designs to local jurisdictions and governing boards to determine financial support for the projects. Elected officials knowing their communities and their needs provided feedback that helped shape the current design of the project. Receiving financial commitments and positive support for the project, Urban Drainage Flood Control District began additional public outreach by attending community events such as Sheridan's National Night out and Englewood's FunFest. Most common public comments have been "when will it be built?" A public open house was held on November 12, 2014 at the Broken Tee Golf Course giving an opportunity for the public to gain more information about the RiverRun Trailhead and project as well as provide feedback. Over 30 business owners, community leaders and public attended the open house. All attending shared positive feedback and support about this project. A website (www.southplatteriverrun.com) has been launched to continue providing the public information, updc;ites and gain feedback from the community. Currently, we have received no objections or opposition toward this proposed project throughout the entire process. 10. Describe how this project addresses inclusivity per the Americans with Disabilities Act guidelines. (3 points) RiverRun Trailhead will be constructed using the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design. The following elements have incorporated into the design throughout the area and comply with a fully accessible ADA park. • Remove all barriers to access • Provide an accessible route of travel and accessible route of travel to the play equipment • Provide a range of accessible equipment and play equipment • Provide an accessible surface beneath all accessible equipment • Half of all elevated play components on a play structure will be accessible by route and/or transfer point. 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 20of43 • • • • • • The development of RiverRun Trailhead will provide the following park amenities: ADA access to existing and proposed regional trails through the plaza and other additional points, ADA paved access to the riverside, ADA accessible pavilion with 200-250 person capacity and ADA picnic tables, Increase parking capacity -199 parking stalls including 4 ADA accessible stalls (1.75/acre), ADA accessible playground with a natural play theme, ADA accessible restroom and Landscaping with irrigation. 11. Discuss the need and urgency for this project and why it is a priority. What opportunities are lost if this project is not funded now? (5 points) The RiverRun Trailhead and trail project along the South Platte River corridor is a regional project guided by the members of the South Platte Working Group. Partners of the South Platte Working Group include the City of Englewood, City of Sheridan, City of Littleton, South Suburban Parks and Recreation District, Urban Drainage Flood Control District, Colorado Water Conservation Board and Arapahoe County Open Space. Each of these members has committed funding resources to this project. Funding from all sources is contingent upon ACOS grant funding. In the absence of grant funding, the Trailhead and trail project w i ll lose priority status among the funding partners, matching funds may be diverted to other projects and this project may not be completed for several years . 12. If successful in obtaining this grant, how will the agency use this project to inform citizens about the value of the Arapahoe County Open Space sales and use tax? Address the public outreach plan, signage plan, celebration, dedication, etc. (2 points) Temporary signage announcing the construction project will be installed along Oxford Avenue and within the current parking area. The signage will identify all funding partners including ACOS for the project and list the project timeline. Permanent signage identifying ACOS support and funding will be installed at the main entrance to the Trailhead once the project has been completed. Information will also be added to the City of Englewood's website identifying the project and funding sources during and following construction. The Englewood Herald will run information and a news stories throughout the project. Social Media such as Facebook and Twitter will be used to provide project updates, recognize accomplishments and promote funding partners. A celebration will be scheduled at the completion of the Trailhead project as a way to recognize the partnerships, funding agents, citizens, county and local dignitaries that helped make this project happen. 13. How much of your planned cash match is secured? How much still needs to be raised and what are your plans for raising additional funds? What is your back up plan if you are unable to raise those funds? Describe the cash and in-kind partnerships established 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 21of43 for this project. This does not include partners who have contributed to previous phases or partners that plan to contribute to future phases . Explain if partnerships were not possible or necessary for this project. Include all partner support letters in Part G and clearly label on the section cover page. Include match from all partners in the Part E Budget. All support letters must be dated within the last six months to be eligible. (5 points) The City of Englewood is in support of funding the RiverRun Trailhead and trail project. This partnered project between the cities of Englewood, Sheridan, South Suburban Parks and Recreation District, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District and the Colorado Water and Conservation Board is an exciting opportunity to improve recreation and economic development along the South Platte Corridor. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District has contributed $551,000 towards the RiverRun Project as noted in the attached partner commitment letter Part G. The City of Englewood has committed $100,000 as the cash match for Phase I of this construction project. The cash match is secure and budgeted using Conservation Trust Funds and Arapahoe County Shareback Funds . Funds have been budgeted for construction of the RiverRun Trailhead in the City's Five-Year Capital Master Plan . 14. Briefly discuss support from entities and user groups that are supporting the project in other ways than cash or in-kind contributions. Support letters should come from users, • user groups, community members, volunteers, schools, etc. A maximum of five (5) • support letters should be attached in Part G and clearly labeled on the section cover page. All letters should be dated within the last six months . (5 points) Overwhelming support for the RiverRun Trail head and trail project throughout the region is provided by the South Platte Working Group members and the communities they represent. Agencies and businesses providing support letters have indicated the primary reasons as being enhancement to an underutilized area, providing river access, and numerous recreational opportunities that will be provided to the cities of Englewood, Sheridan, and Littleton as well as all Arapahoe County residents as a regional attraction. 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 22 of 43 • • • • Certification of accuracy for the Information provided In Part F: Applicant certifies that all of the above answers are accurate and that all information submitted is true to the best of their knowledge. Authorized Signature: ~ 0- (mustbesigned by high~ Print Name and Title: :I;; .. ._..+<=-:S<A.e.4= .J . ..._... ~ ., ti'" ~.._,/ R..o..-h ~--- 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 23 of 43 Date: /-.rz:c= Part G -Attachments (10 points) Use this as the table of contents cover page for the required application attachments. Attachments in this section are supporting documentation to the questions answered in Part F. To receive the full amount of points available for each question, sufficient supporting documentation must be attached. List all attachments in order, by name/title and by page number. 1. Evidence of support from highest authority (official letter or resolution**} - including commitment to complete the project; statement that match funds are secured; and certification that the project will be open to the public or serve a public purpose upon completion 2. Evidence of commitment to long-term maintenance (official letter or resolution} 3 . Evidence of property ownership/legal access (legal documentation} 4. Evidence of community support (letters of support -max. 5, known objections} 5 . Evidence of commitment from funding partners (cash match/in-kind match support letters} 6 . Photos (pre-submittal} 7. Site maps (project location maps} 8. GIS shapefile, if applicable (inclucie on compact disc} 9. Other (clearly title: acquisition documentation, if applicable, or other supporting documents} **Resolution from a Governing Body or an Official Letter from Highest Authority must include • all listed applicable items and must designate a specific person to sign the grant agreement and • related grant administration documents.** 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 24of43 • • • • Part G Attachments -1. Resolution 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 25of43 Part G Attachments -2. Long-Term Maintenance {' c T y 0 F ENGLEWOOD DEP AR T M ENT O F P A R KS AND RECREAT I ON Arapahoe County Open Space and Trails Advisory Board 6934 South Lima Street, Unit A Centenn ial, co 80112 December 1, 2014 Re: Long-Te rm Park Maintenance Dear Open Space Ad visory Board, The City of Englewood Parks and Recreation Department is committed to the long-term maintenance and management of all Englewood parks and park infrastructure within the City. The City of Englewood allocates funds for the long-term maintenance, repair and replacement of park infrastructure. Ongoing maintenance functions Include : trash pickup, graffiti removal , periodic playg round equipment inspection and repairs, restroom and picnic pavilion cleaning, turf maintenance and mowing, trail and sidewalk maintenance, tree, shrub and landscap ing maintenance, lighting and plumbing maintenance and repa ir. The Parks and Recreation Department is funded annua lly through the City of Englewood's General Fund as part of the core seivices provided to the citizens of the City of Englewood. River Run Trallhead Is currently Included In all long-term maintenance programs and activities and will continue to be a part of all such activities into the future . Parks and Recreation Director 1155 W. Oxford Avenue Englewood, Colorado 80 110 Phone 303 -76 2-2680 Fax 303-762-2688 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 26 of43 www.engfewoodgo;•.org • • • • • • Part G Attachments -3. -Evidence of property ownership I I -·-.J. : ::-1 ; JI I ! 1" I I ! I . \ 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 27of43 G 0 (,,..-'\ e. \~/ RiverRun in Sheridan PIN 034835504 ,. __ """t..a-. ,. ... ..... • ... -.......... --· •. ;;:.~ &.:'t ......... _.. .. ..... --_"___ -- Arapahoe County-Parcel Search -· ·--~----~---·-----------~ PIN: AIN: Situs Address: Situs City: Full Owner List: Owner Address: City/State!Zip: Neighborhood: Neighborhood Code: Acreage: Land Use: 034835504 2on-0+3-00-011 Englewood City Of 1000 Englewood Pkwy Englewood, CO 80110-2373 Englewood Ind Area 3537.00 0.0000 Page 1of1 Legal Oesc: That Part Of The Sw 1/4 Sec4-5-68 DescAs Beg At The Nw Cor Of Sd Sw 1/4 Th E 1945 Ft MIL Th Sw 141.15 Ft&46.09FtTh Se 71.81 Ft Th Sw94.85 Ft Th Se 104.93 Ft Th Sw73 .39 FITh S 78.65 Ft & 135.36 Fl Th Sw 440.93 Ft Th W 57.93 Ft Th S 177.87FtThW1949.3 Fl To A Pl On The W Line or Sd Nw 1/4 Th N To Beg Sec 4-5-68 . -·------------------·---. 2014 Appra isMJ Vslu11 2014 Assessed Va lue Total 680,727 197.411 Building 411,sn 119,386 2013 Mill Levy: Land 269,050 78,025 80 .767 ·-------------··. ·- L811dLine Units Land Value Land Use 1 .0000 LT 300 Open Space Nole . L1md Una data above corresponds to the initial app~ed value anc1 does noi n!llsct subsequent sppul related 11d]u!/rnents. If any . • Nol an pan::els have avallable photos f sketches . In some cases a sketch may be difrJCUlt lo read. Please conllld lne Assessors Office for asslslance. Measurements taken from the exterior or the bulld The Arapahoe County AssesSOfS Office does not warranty the securaey of 8llY sketch. nor assumes any respons lblOly Of liabmty to any user . Although S(lme ~reels may have multiple buildings and photos , al this time our system Is llml!ed le 1 sketch 11nd 1 photo per part:el number . Sony for . lnC011venJ1111ce . 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 28 of 43 • • • • • Part G -Attachments 4. Support Letters c ~' T y 0 F E N G PARKS AND R~<;;RfATION January 8, 2015 Ar:ipilhoc County Open Sp:tce Grant Program @34 S. Lima St. Unit A Centennial, Colorado 80112 Ad\isory Boord Members: L E w 0 0 D C:OMMISSION I am writing this ~uer of supfort on behalf of the Englewood Parks nod Recreation Cc:>mmission in support of the Englewood Parks and Recreation Department's grant applkation for die RiverRun Trailhead. The Rh'crRun Trailhcad along the South Platte River will not only bccom= a rcCJClllionn.I destination for the entire region, but will also improve and res1o;e the river and Its habitats. This recreationn.I area along the South Platte River will be enjoyed by bicyclisis, kayakers., ftshets and the general public. The trailhead will olso be ADA accessible .so that evecyone can enjoy lhe amenities. The shelter. reslrootli$, and playground nma:s will be a drow for any outdoor enthusiast. The Commission is supporting this grant application because this development along the rh'er will enhance the image of the City of Englewood within our own community and beyond. This addition will substan1iate the Cily of Englewood's dedccation 10 its parks and the environment Thank you for your consideration of Che RiverRun Trailhead for Englewood'' Parks and Recreatiorr Dep:utmenL Sin~ce.rely. ~ ') :.;....---_.,....-.,~ J I " Ganeu c alt Englewood Parks and Recreation Commission 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 29of43 December 4, 20 I 4 City of Sheridan 410 I S. F ecleral Blvd. Sheridan, CO 80! 10-5399 3031762-2200 FAX 303!'788-1853 Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Program 6934 S. Lima St. Unit A Centennial, Colorado 80112 Dear Board Members, I am writing this letter of support for the Englewood Department of Park and Recreation's application for funds for the RiverRun Trailhead. The City of Sheridan is partnering with the City of Englewood and other organizations lo provide this enhancement to the South Platte River Corridor. This trailhcad will provide the citizens of Sheridan, Englewood, Littleton and South Metro Denver a place lo fish. kayak. swim and enjoy nature. The sheller, restrooms and playground will provide an aesthetic place for bikers to rest and the general public to take in the natural surroundings. This !railhead will be an improvement to the land that is owned by the City of Englewood , but is located within the City of Sheridan. This tract of land is currently not being utilized and will make Sheridan and the entire South Metro area a desirable place to live and visit. Thank you for your consideration of the River Run Trailhead for Englewood's Parks and Recreation Department. Devin Granbery City Manager City of Sheridan 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 30 of 43 www .ci .shertdan.co.us • • • • • XFORD~ () DECYCLING, INC. J'\: 24()0 West Oxford Avenue Englewood, CO 801104340 303-762-1160 • Fax 303-762-1746 • www.oxfordrccycling.com December 17, 2014 An.pahoe County Open Space Grant Program 6934 S. Lima St Unit A Centennial, Colorado 80112 Dear Arapahoe Couno/ Open Space Advisors, I am writing on behalf of Oxford ~cling in support of the grant application for the RiverRun Trailhead along the South Platte River. The trailhead, shelter and playground that will be a part of the Trailhea.d will improve the area and make it a destination spot. Being located near the Trailhead location, Oxford Recycling is excited to bave a nice outdoor place for our employees to relax. or perhaps barbeque after work with their families or coworkers. Any improvements to the area near the South Platte River will be appreciated by all of us who work and live nearl>y. Please consider awarding the City of Englewood grant funds for the River Run Trailhead. Thankyou, John Kent Oxford Recycling 2400 W. Oxford Ave. Englewood, CO 8011 O ....... ._.,Reduce Recycling: A$p!Wt -Concrete -Wood 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 31of43 . .. 't.., Reuse l!) Recycle Supplying: Recycled Asphalt ·Road BMc ·Gravel·~ R<Xk ·Mulch . WAATI! MANMH!Mnn' December 29, 2014 Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Program 6934 S. Lima St. Unit A Centennia l, Colorado 80112 Dear Board Members, WASTE MANAGEMENT 5500 S. Quebec St. Su ite 250 Greenwood Vfllage, CO 00111 I am wrlling th is letter In support on behalf of Waste Management for the grant appl!ca~on for the RlverRun TraHhead along lhe South Platte River. As a business located near !he RiverRun Trailhead, we fully suppcrt the improvements and enhancements lhatwill be made to the location adjacent to the South Platte Rlver. The trailhead, shelter and playground will improve lhe area and the perception of Englewood as a whole. We encourage improvements to all nearby areas in Englewood , especially those that encourage envi ronmental sustainability and outdoor recreation. Thank you for your consideration of the RiverRu n T railhead for Eng lewood's Parks and Recreation Department . -:0;i·11~ ~0:--1//?r Scott Hutch ings 0 Manager of Public Affairs Waste Management Four Comers Area 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 32of43 • • • • • Part G -Attachments 5. Documentation of Opposition and Responses No opposition letters ot responses to include 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 33of43 Part G -Attachments 6. Partner Commitment URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Paul A. Hir:dman, Execu tive Direct or 2480 W. 26th Avenue , Suite 1568 Denver, CO 8021 1 ·5304 December 17, 20 14 Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Program 6934 S. Lima St. Unit A Centennial, Colorado 80112 Dear Arapahoe County Open Space: Telephone 303·455 ·6277 Fax 303-455 -7880 www .udlcd .org Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) is committed to the City of Englewood's River Run Trailhead. UDFCD, the Cities of Englewood and Sheridan, South Suburban Parks and Recreation District, and the Colorado Water and Conservation Board have partnered with Arapahoe County Open Space to continue the South Platte Working Group. Last year, the working group conducted a visioning charrette that brought major stakeholders together to map out opportunities for impro~·ement along the South Platte River. The outcome demonstrated the importance of the improvements included in the River Run Park Project that goes from Oxford to Union along the South Platte River. The goals of River Run Park are to increase the regional trail connectivity and capacity, enhance the river ecosystem, and provide river access and in-river recreation while maintaining 1he I 00-year conveyance . The River Run Trailhead is a key component of the project as it provides unique ameniti1:s not found along the river that will attract more users to the area. These wnenities include; parking, large picnic pavilion , restrooms, water refill and a natural play area for kids. Without the trailhead the full potential of other improvements will not be realized . The River Run Park Project is an outstanding example of leveraging resources and agencies working together to provide the greatest benefit to the community. UDFCD is proud to be part of this project nod is committed to the restoration of the natural, beneficial functions of the noodplain and river. UDFCD has already contributed $551 ,000 to the River Run Park Project Paul A. Hindman Executive Director 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 34 of 43 • • • Part G -Attachments 7. Photos • Existing Conditions-RiverRun Trail head view north-Mary Carter Greenway Trail Bridge • • Existing Conditions-View south-East Bank of River 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 35 of 43 Existing Conditions-View south-East Bank of River Exisiting Conditions-RiverRun Trailhead view north-future site of Trail head 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 36 of 43 • • • • • • 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 37 of 43 OHM Design-View north of river access and Trailhead 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 38 of43 DHM Design -View east of playground • • • • • • 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 39 of 43 OHM Design-View southeast of plaza at Trailhead t'arc u-Anacnmems ~ . .)IIe 1v1a s City of Englewoo4 Colorado 2015 Arapahoe County Open Space, Parks, and Trails Grant Application River Run Trailhead Site Plan Map December 2014 Not to Scale 2015 Standard/Small Grant Anolication Pa2e 41of43 City of Englewood, Colorado 2015 Arapahoe County Open Space, Parks, and Trails Grant Application River Run Trailhead Street Map LEGEND ~ Pedestrian/Bicycle Trails December 2014 {' e 0 800 1,600 2,400 feet ~ l ) • § ..J Ill ~ "( 9 ~ 1-----.-------Cll I :d \ ) I HAMPDEN A'(E I '-I J CHE 1 RRY HILLS, "-V QUINCY AVE VILl.!AGE I BELLEVIEW AVE §1 ai J GREENWOOD ~I VILLAGE ~1 §l ;, a· :X:l I LITTLETON \J ,_______.______ J '\ CENTENNIA t ~ / \ I HIGHLANDS RANCH \ I I ORCHARD RD ARAPAHOE RD DRY CREEK RD I COUNTY LINE RD I ( \ I City off nglewood, Colorado 2015 Arapahoe County Open Space, Parks, and Trails Grant Application 0 River Run Trailhead Vicinity Map LEG1END -South Platte River C Arapahoe County Boundary -Major Highways Arterial and Collector Streets December 2014 {' e 1 2 Miles 3 Part G-Attachments 9. GIS Shapefile • • • Included/Submitted in Part G. Attachment 3-Evidence of Property Ownership . ...... -~~ 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application Page 43of43 • COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Date: Agenda Item: Subject: January 20, 201 5 11 c iv Police Vehicle Replacement Initiated By: Police Department Staff Source: Jeff Sanchez, Deputy Chief Pat White, Fleet Manager COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION City Council regularly approves requests for new vehicle replacement. RECOMMENDED ACTION The Police Department is recommending that Council approve, by motion, the purchase of one 2015 Ford Interceptor for use as a marked police vehicle. Staff recommends purchasing the vehicle through the state bid in the amount of $27,517.00. The purchase is conditional upon approval of a supplemental appropriation for a transfer of $4,000 to the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund from the General Fund {11 c v). • BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED • The Police Department and the Public Works Department are working together to facilitate the replacement of one marked police vehicle. The current vehicle is a 2011 Ford Crown Victoria which has met the replacement criteria of years of service, mileage and maintenance dollars expended . FINANCIAL IMPACT The Ford Interceptor is available on a state bid for $27,51 7.00 which will be paid for through the existing Capital Equipment Replacement Fund {CERF) account budgeted by the Police Department and contingent upon approval of a supplemental appropriation transferring an additional $4,000 to the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (11 c v). LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Service Center Garage Summary Specification Sheet for New Vehicles (and related attachments) • • • STATE AWARD# ENGLEWOOD BID# SERVICENTER GARAGE SUMMARY SPECIFICATION SHEET FOR NEW VEHICLES 201500000000207 MANUFACTURER OF VEHICLE Ford MODEL OF VEHICLE Interceptor Utility AIR CONDITIONING YES AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION YES POWER WINDOWS YES POWER DOOR LOCKS YES 4 WHEEL DRIVE YES FLEX FUEL OPTION YES CERF REPLACEMENT YES NEW ADDITION TO FLEET YES DEPARTMENT VEHICLE ASSIGNED TO 021105. Police O~rations NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO COMMENTS: This unit reolaces Unit 7439, a 2011 Crown Victoria patrol car. that has met the replacement criteria of years of service. miles of use, and maintenance dollars expended. The unit that is replacing it is a all-wheel drive SUV as per department request. The funds are available in the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (CERF). The cost of this unit will be $27.517.00 through State Award 201500000000207 . • Class: SUV 4x4 R.presenta!lva Models: 1: FORD 3 : Coloredo Stale Fleet M1n1g1m1nt 2015 VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS Dealers lnvltaUon to Bid BodyCqdt: Kl lNTERCEP lITIL PA§S UTIL MEDIUM AWD PA!ROL 2: DODGE DUFIANGO 4: 8127/2014 MAKE: Gr). MODEL: k-1lL.( L, uh 1,-.rb!M MODELI: k. K A TAIM LEVEL: ~ , , • l. ' OEM CODE: _$0 oA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS : 103 PASS: 5 PERSONS MIN. OEM CODE INDICATE ACTUAL DEALER SPECIFICATIONS v--' v 111 DOORS: 4 FllU. SIZE SIDE DOORS 810 PKG POLICE AWO UTILITY (Attachml) 910 PRIMARY FUEL: UNLEADED _v-__ ~kfvL...~ At.Jn < ~.+L. ~l. z..,,f,"M v rev J4sg1,~"-£ {E3~ c~i,~I~ 2 991 STD WANTY· BUMPER TO BUMPER 3136 V AVAILABLE OPTIONS: OEM CODEACTUAL I COMMENTS PRICE rJ /Ft 254 ALT FUEL· OEM Bl FUEL SPECIFY TANK LOC ,J ) ff 255 ALT FUEL• OEM DEDICATED SPEC TANK LOC N l A 256 EBS ·OEM Bl FUEL _._s._--_/ ..._)_..tt: ..... J1 ...... 'J_.fl .... G--_-'.) ____________ -J:"' \ ..,~ 2811 PUSH BUMBER PB400 f 22'~ k J}·c. \ k),. '-/ k ~ 287 PUSH BUMP PS.COOWIPBS FENDER PROTECTt _i_i_~_ -~h......._ ....... ~._~.__'_l-t. ........... }......_ ________ ft 413 TWO·WHEEL DRIVE: FRONT J ~ t A-i ~ ~ I ~ \>i.--- 414 TWO·WHEEL DRIVE: REAR N' + Ai,. . \ '"\. (.L tJ 430 PCKG:TOWINGJRCVA HITCH{Atchmtl ,Jo.$-~onr"~, ~\.t. t.J .... ~ ':l> "'fl Cri.!.L"1i ~~ AJH 444 ENGINE BLOCK HEATER /-/ I H 3 s- 472 EPACT AFV CREDIT: Specify /J/A 505 RIGHT SPOTLIGHT: RED LENS -s 0 ~ I S'i 507 RIGHT SPOTUG~ CLEAR LENS 5 O ?' J ~ S 528 PACKAGE: LIGHT BAR (atlchml not Installed} .. ~}~ I sPo 533 WIRING,ROOFLIGHTINGWITHHOLE S:~1 I 'S"'O 550 DELETE 602 1Ns1DE REAR oooR HANDLES OPERATIONAL si H .....,_;==.,,L ......... .r.;;.;..;;;.....;;--..o..;;..;;._~___._.;:;o,m,c;.o...=---.....;......;..--J L/ o 604 PUSH BUMPER SETINA 16" ~ . ~ 0 q LI t:>D 808 HYBRID GAS/ELECTRIC NIA ______ _.............. _____ ~ 663 UNDERCOVER LIGHT PKG K7 & KB (allchmt} l,\,, 1, l • KO ' I • .II"' A"'"' DELETE READY FOA RD PKG (INTERCPTR om J fl?., U' ~,{ I ·n '/ SEEEXHIBITA Pr'ilr\1 2-t1.'"lt11;,,.J;o ... LlGHTBAR INSTALL l/i 1 ___ .J ___ ·_' _________ 2~ Class: SUV 4x4 Representative Models: 1: FORD 3: Colorado State Fleet Management 2015 VEHICLE SPECIF1CATIONS Dealers tnvltatlcn tc Bid B9dv Code: !S! PASS UT!l MEDIUM AWD PA!BOL INTERCEP UTIL 2:DODGE 4: DURANGO Page2cf3 8127/2014 MAKE: ----MODEL: ------OEM MODEL I: ----TRIM LEVEL: ---OEM CODE: --- AVAILABLE OPTIONS: .~----------------. 738 INSTALL 758 DELETE PKG #810 753 PHEV (PLUG IN HYBRID ELEC VEH) 784 DELETE LEFT SPOTLIGHT 794 DELETE REVERSE SENSE SYS (INTER ONLY) 800 FLOOR MATS FRONT ANO REAR 812 DELETE REAR MIRROR CAMERA (INTER ONLY) 813 DELETI; SYNC (INTERCEPTOR ONLY) 814 DELETE BLIS (INTERCEPTOR ONLY) 982 EXT WARRANTY ·POWER TRAIN 51100,000 OEM COOEACTUAL/ COMMENTS PRICE frl l;Ar:, e~ e.peJ,·c.:~!'- • • • • Class: SUV 4x4 Representative Models: 1: FORD 3 : Calonido Stale Fleet M1n1511mcml 2015 VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS Dealers lnvltaUon to Bid BodvCod!; IS§ PASS UTIL MEDIUM AWQ PATROL INTERCEP UTIL 2: DODGE 4: DURANGO Page3 of3 1127/2014 MAKE: ----MODEL: -------OEM MODEL II: ----mtM LEVEL: ----OEM CODE: --- AVAILABLE COLORS: Please attach manufacturer color chart OTHER VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS I OPTIONS (Please attach separate sheet II neces PRICE ~ /:l-9 t-( •'.-.... k \ \.>;~t..\....<. ~ -f, $ "'"' /j-.(' ----~~c~s~e_:r;;_.J.O=-...,.;:---~_ ........ ~----~~~~'---...f,,__ __________ ~--------------=--~;;s:~ ______ _._p;__.._r~"'"-1:~«~~-L.--v-,__J~,~k+y~l~---------------------------K1c STANDARD FACTORY WARRANTV (Attach detalled dascrlpUon): MILES Bumper 10 Bumper 3l,'L Drive Train loot.. Other OPTIONAL FACTORY WARRANTY (Attach datallad desc:ripllon); • rr~ ... ;.,, .. [_-.,< MILES ;ootL I&> EPA FUEL RATING:-----M.P.G CITY, MONTHS ll., leo MONTHS PRICE leO __ o<_J __ M.P.G HIGHWAY OEM MINIMUM FUEL RATED OCTANE".._:__..8""--::t-__________ _ DELIVERY: jO .,. \1,() DAYS FROM DEALER RECEIPT OF ORDER FROM STATE (E.G . 90 DAYS) IDENTIFY ANV EXCEPTIONS TO SPECIFICATIONS : oEALERNAME: Stl\.:fu8-w d\uiof'~ DEALER PHONE: 3 03 ~ 5~&'-3 0~ ef • BlDDER'SNAME< ?~~ SIGNATURE: -~-"P'i~-'-~-~-:..._ ______ _ • • • Colorado State Purchasing Office (per SFM) LIST AND EXPLANATIONS OF VEHICLE PACKAGES FOR THE 2015 MODEL YEAR FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSALS Page41of52 #810 -PACKAGE: POLICE AWD UTILTIY MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS FOR 2015 MODEL YEAR "K8u MEDIUM-SIZE, 4 DR, AWD, UTILTIY PATROL VEHICLES 2015 V-5, Medium-size, 4-door, All Wheel drive, utility type certified patrol vehicle: Ford Police Interceptor Utility -K8A SPECIFICATIONS Comply (circle Y or N) Air Bags CTI N Front seat side airbags, plus Safety canopy system with side ..-curtain airbags and rollover sensor . Air Conditioning: \!) N Factory-installed air conditioning. Alternator System: ~N High-output, 220 amp maximum, heavy-duty alternator Battery: -.. N Heavy duty maintenance free battery 750 CCA with battery saver. Blis (558): N Blind spot monitoring with cross traffic alert Brakes: IN 4 wheel heavy-duty disc with heavy-duty front and rear cafipers. Console mounting: \YJ N Console mounting plate Console: '\!) N 23h Havis console, Includes cup holder. Includes radio brackets to accommodate a Motorola APEX 6500 VHF & DTR. Cooler, Enaine Oil: ~N Auxiliarv enalne oil cooler. Cooler, Transmission WN External air-to-oil transmission oil cooler. Oil: Courtesy Liaht(43D): '1 N Dark car feature-Disable courtesv llaht when door is ooened Cruise Control: N J N Cruise control system with lilt steering wheel. Defroster, Rear ~1 N Electric rear window defroster I defogger. Window: - Differential: \'ii N Axle. ratio to be approximately 3.65 to 1. Engine (99R): \)' N Engine size of 3.7L Tl-VCT V-6 Flex Fuel (minimum). Emergency Lighting l\\YJ N Ready for road package, includes packages 66A-Front Headlamp Package #67H: lighting, 668-Tail Lamp Lighting, 66C-Rear lighting plus -Whelen I. t,iJ CanTrol siren and lighting control system. System to include a remote mounted photo cell that will be direct wired to the CanTrol Inputs as per CSPNVhelen specs. CanTrol system to have ~o 'et interface cable pre wired from the rear of the vehicle to the console ,.,.t area for the CANCTL 1 control head to be attached. Part number CanTrolff~.r:f£~w/ Control Head# [CANCTL 1l, Photo Cell part number ANWTE -Pre-wiring for grille lamp, siren and speaker (60A) -Rear console plate (85R) -contours through 2nd row; channel for wiring -Grille linear LED Lights (Red I Blue) -100-Watt Siren I Speaker -Hidden Door-Lock Plunger I Rear-Door Handles Inoperable (52P) -Wiring Harness: Two (2) light cables -Supports up to six (6) lights (engine compartment) Two (2) grille light cables, Two (2) 50 amp battery and ground circuits in RH rear-quarter, One (1) 10 amp Siren I Speaker circuit to engine cargo area Flasher, Headlight: ,Y\ N lntergraded LED police flashers. Flasher, Taillight 1J.Y\ N lntergraded police flashers. Foot Pedals ~N Power adjustable gas and brake pedals Flooring: \~) N Heavy duty vinyl flooring. Delete floor mats. Colorado State Purchasing Office (per SFM) LIST AND EXPLANATIONS OF VEHICLE PACKAGES FOR THE 2015 MODEL YEAR FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSALS Page42of52 ~ Gauges: \'lj N Voltmeter, oil pressure, and water temperature and fuel gauges "' mounted in dash in normal positions. Locking System: WJ N Single key locking system (different key for each vehicle) with remote keyless entry key fob. Locks, Power: ~N Power door locks controlled from driver's and passenger position, rear door handles to remain operational. Mirrors, Outside ©N Left and right outside mirrors, power electric remote, manual folding (558): -with integrated spotter. Radio Suppression \!) N Radio Interference Suppression Package -Bonding straps Package (SOR) Radio AM/FM: '4 N OEM AM/FM/CD Radio Rear View Camera \'t) N Video displays in the rear view mirror. (218): Reverse Sensing '\Q N Reverse sensing system. (76R): - Seats: \y N Heavy duty front bucket cloth seats. 2na row seat to be vinyl Speedometer: Q::.•N Speedometer to be calibrated and certified to be within 2% ,....,. accuracy at all speeds. Spotlight: (9 N One, driver's-side spot light, cowl or post mounted, 5" in diameter. Head to be mounted on door pillar in such a manner as to provide '\" adequate clearance from steering wheel in all positions of spotlight 'J and tilt steering wheel. White lens to have a minimum of 160,000 candle-power. Unity 94012-0002 with sealed beam bulb, or ,-.... equivalent. Dealer installed Steering: v N Heavy duty electric power assisted steering (EPAS) Suspension System: ~f ) N Independent front and rear suspension. SYNC Basic (53M): (~ N Hands free voice activated communication system Tires and Wheels: \() N Five heavy-duty 1 an steel wheels and five Goodyear tires (P245/55R18) all season BSW. Tire pressure monitoring system ,.... included. Traction Control: \9 N Advance Trac with RSC (Roll Stability Control) police tuned "" gyroscopic sensors work with ABS. Transmission: \!.) N Heavy-duty minimum of 6-speed automatic transmission with over- drive. Police calibrated '\L\C VVheel Covers (648): ~N 18" full face wheel caver. u 'S' L. Windows, Power: ~N Power windows. Rear window power delete, operable from front (18W) driver side switch THE WARRANTY IS TO GO INTO EFFECT ON THE DATE THE VEHICLE IS PUT INTO SERVICE, NOT THE PURCHASE DATE. ENO USER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFING THE MANUFACTURER OF THE IN SERVICE DATE. Delivery to be made to the Colorado State Patrol at 15203 W. 12th Ave., Golden, CO 80401. Per State Fleet Management instructions. OTHER Please list a description of any additions and/or deletions to your factory's • • • • • • Page4Jof52 Colorado State Purchasing Office (per SFM) LIST AND EXPLANATIONS OF VEHICLE PACKAGES FOR THE 2015 MODEL YEAR FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSALS POLICE PACKAGE from the above listed specs or list next to the item directly on the attached sheets described above: Body Code:~~~~ ATTACH A COPY OF THIS FORM TO THE "DEALER'S INVITATION TO BID" FOR BODY CODE KB WHICH HAS OPTION PACKAGE #810. Since this Packaqa is put of the StandaJ:d Specification for body code KB, the total. cost :for this package must be included in the "Standard Vahi.cle Base J?.z:ice" as listed on paqe 1 of the Vehicle Specs for this body code • • • • PalJ8 36 of 52 Colorado State Purchasing Office (per SFM) UST AND EXPLANATIONS OF VEHICLE PACKAGES FOR THE 2015 MODEL YEAR FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSALS #528 -Package Light Bar Attach one copy of this form to each body code specification sheet that has an Available Option #528 in the following body codes: AS, A7, AB, E2, F2, J4, K2, K7 '® Bid equipment for vehicle model being bid. The LIGHT BAR PACKAGE must Include the following: • (Non-OEM) Whelen liberty 2 Model IW8CSP1 o FRONT (Driver-Passenger) • RED Linear 12 diode LED comer module, RED Linear 6 diode LED outboard module, RED Linear-6 diode LED inboard module, (2) 12 Diode LED Take Down Lights, BLUE Linear-6 diode LED inboard module, BLUE Linear-6 diode LED outboard module, BLUE Linear-12 diode LED comer module. o REAR (Driver-Passenger); • RED Linear 12 diode LED comer module, RED Linear 6 diode LED outboard module, RED Linear-6 diode LED inboard module, RED Linear 6-diode LED inboard module, Blue Linear 6-diode LED inboard module, BLUE Linear-6 diode LED inboard module, BLUE Linear-6 diode LED outboard module, BLUE Linear-12 diode LED comer module o SIDES (Driver-Passener) • Single 3-LED Vertical LED Alley Light Modules • Lenses o All lenses shall be clear in color • Mounting kit o Mounting kit to match vehicle application from bid award-Mounting brackets for the AS, A7 and A8 are to be powder coated Black. • Delivery o Light bar to be delivered in factory shipping box and placed in the trunk of the new vehicle when delivered to Colorado State Patrol Garage (No Installation). If bidding equal, must have exact configuration of the above light bar to provide uniform appearance and functionality. List the make and model of Light Bar that is bid: Make tl\..L\..t_v-Model Lhciw1 ~ ll)B' (<jf f • r List any additions and/or deletions of your bid from the LIGHT BAR PACKAGE spec's listed above: Total Price for PACKAGE: LIGHT BAR: $ Is-p ~ For Body Code .t:...i j ... Page38of52 Colorado State Purchasing Office (per SFM) LIST AND EXPLANATIONS OF VEHICLE PACKAGES FOR THE 2015 MODEL YEAR FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSALS #663 -Undercover Lighting Package Attach one copy of this form to each body code specification sheet that has an Available Option #663 in the following body codes : J4, K.2, K7, €J Bid equipment for vehicle model being bid. The UNDERCOVER LIGHTING PACKAGE must include the following: ~n-OEM) Whelen Model Inner Edge Front: QW34UFX}. Interceptor Utility, IW45UFX -Tahoe, IWOBUFX -Expedition, IW44UFX - Durango • Front lnner-EdQeCDriver-Passengerl o Red LED module X4, takedown module X2, blue LED module X4 o No .. one-way Mirrored housing on driver side. • (Non-OEM) Whelen Traffic Adviso@a&R'S Rear: Same model for all 3 vehicle types -·_.,... • Rear lnner-Edge(Qriver-Passengerl o Red LED Warning module, AMBERT/A module X6, Blue warning module. • o TIA to function separately from Red/Blue light and plug directly into the • CanTrol CANWC1 w/Control Head# CANCTL1. • Mounting kit o Mounting kit to match vehicle application from bid award • Delivery o Lighting and siren/lighting/traffic advisor to be delivered in factory shipping box and placed in the trunk .of tb new vehicle when delivered to Colorado State Patrol Garag~stallation). If bidding equal, must have exact configuration of the above light bar to provide uniform appearance and functionality. List the make and model of Lighting Package that is bid: Make ldL-t.../..e ~ Model / W JV Ll F )( Make }J\t:· \.~/--Model 7A::t ?'~t~~ List any additions and/or deletions of your bid from the UNDERCOVER LIGHTING PACKAGE spec's listed above: Total Price for UNDERCOVER LIGHTING PACKAGE: $ '2., S-o 40 For Body Code /LE . • • • • To: City ol Englewood All: Sgt. Vance Fender Subj: 2015 Ford Police SUV Interceptor re State of Colorado B id Slll-TerHar Motors Inc PO Box 344 150 Alter St Broomfield, CO BDD3B QUOTE OEM# 2015 Ford Utility PoUce Interceptor All-Whl Drive KBA Flex Fuel (E·BS capable) 3.7L V-6 Gasoline Engine 99R , 304hp/279 lt·lb, 16·21 EPA mpg std Automatic 6-Spd Transmission with Column Shift H·Dty Radiator I Eng and Trans Oil Coolers 3.65:1 Axle. non-limited sup (3.39:1 for Front Whl Orv) White Exterior (Oxford While; same as previously on Cr Vic) VZ Front Bucket Seats with 6-way Power DM's, Manual lumbar/lilt . Cloth, Charcoal Black 9W Rear Bench Seat Folds Down Flat, Vinyt , Charcoal Black 9W Seats armored and sculpted for utiity belts Vinyt Rubber Flooring AH Standard Police Interceptor Equipment, inciuding, but not limited to; SOOA Dual Front Air Bags Dual Front Side Air Bags mounted in bucket seat backs Roll Curtain Safely Canopy Airbags from above doors Power Adjust Foot Pedals Front Console Mounting Plale I 9·1nch space I Dash Pass·lhru for wiring I Powel' Pigtail Till SteeringfSpeed Control Tire Pressure Monitoring System Certified Speedometer I Engine Hour Meter 220 Amp Alternator AM·FM-CD·MP3 Radio with pre-wire for Police Radio Power Windllocks/non·heated Mirrors, A·C, Cabin Air Filter 2nd Row/Rear Privacy Glass P245/55R18 AJS BSW tires with Full Sz Spare; Center Hub Caps; Rear Tow Hooks ABS I Traction Cntri I Roll Stability Cntri Std Warranty: 36mo/36Kmi Comprehensive+ 6Dmo/100K ml Powertrain Also Included In Base Bid Stale Police Package #810 which adds the following Non-Standard Options : Blind Spot Monitoring System (Requires Rear View Camera) Includes Heated Mirrors 55B Rear View Camera (Requires SYNC hands-free ceR phone use system) 21 B SYNC system (no phone Included) Can Stand Alone for hands·free celular phone 53M Ford Ready-for-Road Package with modification for lighting controller: 67H Headlghl/Tallghl Side Hemispheric LED Flashers, White Backglass and Tallgate·Up Rear LED Flshrs, Red·Blue Grille LED Linear Lights, Red-Blue/ 100W Siren-Speaker Rear Console Mounting Plate, Whelen WECAN Cable console to cargo Hidden Lock Plungers I Rear Door Handles Inoperable (Inside) Modified: Whelen Cantrel , CANWC1 , CANCTL 1, CANLITEB, "plus" Wire Harness specific 1-Dec·14 s for Whelen Cantrol with Power Dlstribulion and Two 50 amp battery circuits and Linear LED Grille Lights 23" Havis Console Disabled Courtesy Lights 430 Disabled Rr Window Switches (driver can control} 18W Driver Spot Lamp , with Incandescent bulb 51Y Reverse Sensing System (sonar w ith chime) 76R Full Wheel Covers 65L Radio Noise Suppression Pkg 60R (Not Included: roof Ught bar, push bumper, programmable steering wheel switches) Total complete , for one as above, fob Broomfield Opt Colors: Ariz Beige Met, Med Brown Met, Smokestone Met, Kodiac Brown Met. Dk Torreador Red Met, Deep Impact Blue, N0tsea Blue Met, Dark Blue , Royal Blue, Light Blue Met, Ultra Blue Met, Sllvet' Grey Met, Sterling Grey Met, Ingot Silver Met, Med Tilanium Mel , Ebony Commonalities with Ford Police Interceptor Sedan: Fr and Ar Brake rotors, calpers, pads; Wheels; Battery; Alternator; Fr Seats; Fillers; Spark plugs Deducts: All of Slate Pollce Pkg 810 as described above, except Standard Equip (deletes all following deducts) Adds: 31 ,637 (-} -6000 Total Notes: Courtesy Lamps Inoperable Heated Outside Mirrors (for SUV without BLIS) Hidden Door Lock Plunger with Rr Door Handles Inoperable (Inside) Noise Suppression Pkg Driver and Passenger Spot Lamp with lncadescent bulb Reverse Sensing (Sonar with Chime) Fr Hdlamp Llght'g Solution (Projector Hd Lmps plus PTW bulbs plus side White LEDs) Order-to-Delivery lime Is currently 10-12 weeks Final Order Dale Is January 30th, 2015 Thank-you for the apportunity to be of service, Jon Hansen, 303-588-3052, Direct fax 720-284-0791 !hansenOsthmolors.com 430 20 • 549 60 52P 160 SOR 100 51Z 350 76R 275 66A 915 27,517 • • ./ • COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Date: Agenda Item: Subject: January 20, 2015 11 c v Resolution for a transfer of funds and a supplemental appropriation for upgrades to a Police Department vehicle not originally budgeted for or accumulated in the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (CERF) Initiated By: Staff Source: Finance and Administrative Services Department Frank Gryglewicz, Director COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION City Council has not previously discussed this particular issue but has made public safety a top priority for many years . The City Council approved the 2015 Budget on final reading on November 3, 2014. RECOMMENDED ACTION • Staff recommends C ity Council approve the attached resolution for a transfer and supplemental appropriation of funds for additional costs related to additional costs of obtaining and upgrading a 2015 Ford Police Interceptor Utility Vehicle as a marked police vehicle . SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS GENERAL FUND: SOURCE OF FUNDS: Undesignated Fund Balance $4,000 USE OF FUNDS: Tra~r Out to the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund $4,000 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND: SOURCE OF FUNDS: Transfer In from the General Fund $4,000 USE OF FUNDS: Ford Police Interceptor Utility Vehicle Upgrades $4,000 • BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED This transfer and supplemental appropriation was not known when the 2015 Budget was prepared nor was a Ford lnterpector anticipated as the replace vehicle for the 2011 Ford Crown Victoria that is at the end of its useful life. FINANCIAL IMPACT The General Fund's Undesignated Reserves will decrease $4,000. The Police Department will budget for payments to the CERF for the replacement cost of this vehicle over the term of its useful life in the future. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Proposed Resolution • • • t • • • RESOLUTION NO . SERIES OF 2015 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS TO THE 2015 BUDGET. WHEREAS, the City of Englewood is required by City Charter to ensure that expenditures do not exceed legally adopted appropriations; and WHEREAS , the 2015 Budget was submitted and approved by the Englewood City Council on November 3, 2014; and WHEREAS, staff recommends City Council approve a transfer and supplemental appropriation of funds for additional costs related to obtaining and upgrading a 2015 Ford Police Interceptor Utility Vehicle as a marked police vehicle; and WHEREAS , this transfer and supplemental appropriation was not known when the 2015 Budget was prepared nor was a Ford Interceptor anticipated as the replacement vehicle for the 2011 Ford Crown Victoria that is at the end of its useful life; WHEREAS, the General Fund's Undesignated Reserves will decrease $4 ,000 .00 , the Police Department will budget for payments to the CERF for the replacement cost of this vehicle over the term of its useful life in the future . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Budget for the General Fund of the City of Englewood, Colorado, is hereby amended for the year 2014, as follows : GENERAL FUND: SOURCE OF FUNDS: Undesignated Fund Balance $4 ,000.00 USE OF FUNDS: Transfer Out to the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund $4,000 .00 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND: SOURCE OF FUNDS: Transfer In from the General Fund $4 ,000.00 USE OF FUNDS : Ford Police Interceptor Utility Vehicle Upgrades $4 ,000 .00 Section 2. The City Manager and the Director of Finance and Administrative Services are hereby authorized to make the above changes to the 2015 Budget for the City of Englewood. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 20th day of January, 2015 ATTEST: Randy P. Penn, Mayor Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk for the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify the above is a true copy of Resolution No. __ , Series of 2015. Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk • • • • • • RESOLUTION NO . SERIES OF 2015 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SALARY FOR THE MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR2015 WHEREAS , the City Council, by Section 68 of the Englewood Home Rule Charter, has the responsibility of establishing salaries for the Municipal Judge; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. For the year of 2015 the annual base pay for the Municipal Court Judge shall b e increased 3% commencing on his anniversary. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 20th day of January, 2015 Randy P . Penn, Mayor ATTEST: Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk for the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify the abov e is a true copy of Resolution No. _, Series of 2015 Loucrishia A Ellis 12 bi Registration Air Fare Land Travel Hotel Meals Total ESTIMATED NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES CONFERENCE March 7-11 , 2015 -Washington, D. C. Gill it Jefferson Mccaslin Olson Penn $560.00 l~ $560.00 $560.00 375.00 375 .00 375.00 25 .00 25.00 25 .00 1,172.48 1,172.48 1,172.48 347.00 347.00 347.00 2,479.48 ,. __) 2,479.48 2,479.48 -· Wilson +oW Yates $425 .00 375.00 25.00 1,172.48 347.00 2,344.48 ) fl\ '/,. ,-iW 1,. 1..j-0 q~'}t ~