HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-06-15 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet•
•
•
Agenda for the
Regular Meeting of the
Englewood City Council
Monday, June 15, 2015
7:30 pm
Englewood Civic Center -Council Chambers
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, CO 80110
1. Call to Order.
2. Invocation .
3. Pledge of Allegiance.
4 . Roll Call .
5. Consideration of Minutes of Previous Session.
a. Minutes from the Regular City Council Meeting of June 1, 2015 .
6 . Recognition of Scheduled Public Comment. (This is an opportunity for the public to address City
Council. There is an expectation that the presentation will be conducted in a respectful manner.
Council may ask questions for clarification, but there will not be any dialogue. Please limit your
presentation to five minutes.)
a. Elaine Hults, an Englewood resident, will be present to address City Council and clarify points
about her recent reading of the "Emperor's New Clothes."
7. Recognition of Unscheduled Public Comment. (This is an opportunity for the public to address City
Council. There is an expectation that the presentation will be conducted in a respectful manner.
Council may ask questions for clarification, but there will not be any dialogue. Please limit your
presentation to three minutes . Time for unscheduled public comment may be limited to 45 minutes,
and if limited, shall be continued to General Discussion.)
Council Response to Public Comment.
Please note : If you have a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City of Englewood
(303-762-2405) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed.
Englewood City Council Agenda
June 15 , 2015
Page 2
8. Communications, Proclamations, and Appointments.
9. Consent Agenda Items
a. Approval of Ordinances on First Reading.
i. Council Bill No. 24 -Recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Department to
approve a bill for an ordinance authorizing an intergovernmental agreement with
Arapahoe County for the acceptance and use of Open Space grant funding in the
amount of $200, 100 for the Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancement Phase I. Staff
Source: Dave lee, Open Space Manager.
ii. Council Bill No. 25 -Recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Department to
approve a bill for an ordinance authorizing an intergovernmental agreement with
Arapahoe County for the acceptance and use of Open Space grant funding in the
amount of $300,000 for the Englewood RiverRun Trailhead Phase I. Staff Source: Joe
Sack, Recreation Services Manager.
b. Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading.
c. Resolutions and Motions.
i. Recommendation from the Public Works -Department to approve, by motion, a
construction contract for the 2015 Concrete Utility program. Staff recommends
awarding the bid to NORRA Concrete Construction, in the amount of $615,565.75.
Staff Source: Larry Nimmo, Field Operations Administrator.
10. Public Hearing Items. (None Scheduled)
11. Ordinances, Resolutions and Motions.
a. Approval of Ordinances on First Reading.
b. Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading.
c. Resolutions and Motions.
i. Recommendation from the Finance and Administrative Services Department and
Community Development Department to approve a resolution authorizing a
supplemental appropriation transferring $50,000 to the Commercial Catalyst Grant
Program. Staff Source: Eric A. Keck, City Manager/Acting Finance and
Administrative Services Director.
ii. Recommendation from the Utilities Department to approve, by motion, a professional
services agreement to perform Alternative Analysis, Preliminary Design and Special
Services for alleviating water hardness at the Allen Water Treatment Plant. Staff
recommends awarding the contract to Mclaughlin Whitewater Design Group in the
amount of $78,435.00. Staff Source: Tom Brennan, Utilities Manager.
Please note: If you have a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City of Englewood
(303-762-2405) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed.
•
•
•
Englewood City Council Agenda
June 15 , 2015
Page 3
12 . General Discussion.
a. Mayor's Choice .
i. Announcement of a Special Meeting on June 29, 2015 -Union Negotiations -
NonEmergency Union and a personnel issue related to the City Attorney.
Council will open the public meeting in the Community Room. After announcing the
topic or topics to be discussed under the specific paragraph(s) of C.R.S. 24-6-402-4, a
vote of Council will be taken to go into Executive Session . If 2/3 of the quorum present
votes affirmatively, attendance shall be limited to the members of City Council and
Council may invite other persons as may be required for advice and information. City
Council and invited persons will move to the City Council Conference Room. No formal
vote will be taken on any matter under discussion.
b. Council Members' Choice.
i. Emergency Council Bill No. 26, creating a moratorium on the establishment of new
marijuana consumption establishments.
13. City Manager's Report.
• 14. City Attorney's Report.
•
15. Adjournment.
Please note : If you have a disability and need auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City of Englewood
(303-762-2405) at least 48 hours in advance of when services are needed.
PUBLIC COMMENT ROSTER
AGENDA ITEM 7
UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENT
June 15, 2015
PLEASE LIMIT YOUR PRESENTATION TO THREE MINUTES
PLEASE PRINT
~1 1 S"'Cor1JVIA S±-
~ w s . Q;..rtv.... t-...
3o~4 s. levo.t.tt st: ~--as?-~z.1q
~Ott "5 sen -szt -ot ro
w1Cf cJtLore-1 0esffo.// ;l.Y14o 5 ·0tr £:~~~?J~9?~!j 0
E'-m Al L-
~ ~t~~ ~ h~ a;{. wvn-
':l~M £>pi e@__ ydiao · loWL--
da.we.sf)ail {) 5-.1nat'f . ~
lorefJ°w(jjgina;I. ~
/it~ fc4 t <f BJ .5,0._sO~ 3o3 ~ 0 ~OC>6
[/;1,Jfionef dlJ#e>S. ~ 1!'1-?;;z..i.JS>-?o iJtJ.~ia< b0
,1 2.~S'-l s CM~· af ez;r a49r',~ieh.-,s~~; fJonna_1velson ~~od 1 w @113 '20--.Pg--V"T' J11ieA/.brPnca£~t~
5-J-e,vt.. lfi~ "" 303-?<t8-0fob1~ ·
Lou Ellis
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc :
Subject:
Heads up
From: Lucy Tayane
Lindsay van Colditz
Monday, June 15, 2015 3:43 PM
Lou Ellis; Sharon Washington; Stephanie Carlile
Eric Keck
FW : June 11 Flooding
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 3 :35 PM
To: Leigh Ann Hoffhines
Subject: FW : June 11 Flooding
FYI
Lucy Tayane
HR Analyst
City of .Englewood
Office: (303) 762-2371
Main: (303) 762-2370
Fax: (303) 783-6897
Email: ltayane@englewoodgov .org
www.englewoodgov.org
From: Nextdoor Englewood Area 3 [mailto:reply@rs.email.nextdoor.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 1:20 PM
To: Lucy Tayane
Subject: June 11 Flooding
Suzie E1bner. Englewood Area 3
Many of us suffered a great deal of damage to our homes and property
during the rain/flooding last Thursday n ight. Some of the damage was
unavoidable, however, many of us experienced damage from storm
drain failure .
T his is certainly not the first time that this has happened and will not be
the last. .... the C ity of Englewood has not addressed th is problem even
after repeated requests for assistance by res idents. Even if yo u r home
d id not suffer damage , property values in the neighborhood could be
affected by these floods.
1
There is a City Council meeting this evening at 7:30 and I, along with
neighbors , will be there to try to open the door to discussion and
solutions to the severe problem in our area . Would greatly appreciate
your presence at th is meeting if possib le .
Jun 15 1n General to your neighborhood
View or reply Thank Private message
ou can also reply to this email or use Nextdoor for iPhone or Android
Th1:" message 1s intended for ltayane@englevvoodgov org
Unsubscribe or adjust your email settings
Nextdoor Inc. 760 Market St Suite 300 San Francisco CA 94102
2
l l l I l
•
•
•
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Date: Agenda Item: Subject: IGA for 2015 Grant Englewood
June 15, 2015 9 a i Parks Gateway Enhancements Phase I
Initiated By: Staff Source:
Parks & Recreation Department Dave Lee, Open Space Manager
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
The City of Englewood's Mission is to promote and ensure a high quality of life, economic vitality and a
uniquely desirable community identity.
City Council previously approved a resolution supporting the City's grant application to Arapahoe County
Open Space for Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements Phase I on January 20, 2015.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that Council approve a bill for an Ordinance authorizing an Intergovernmental
Agreement with Arapahoe County for the acceptance and use of Open Space grant funding in the amount
of $200, 100 for the Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements Phase I.
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
The Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase I) demonstrate a much overdue need to replace 1 7 signs that are
currently comprised of 50 year old hand made park identification signs with a more modern, updated
design for park identification signage with additional landscaping surrounding the park signs. The
Community believes these park ID signs are the gateway into each of our neighborhood parks and are
critical to identifying each of Englewood's parks. Replacement of the park ID signs will improve the image
of the City of Englewood. The goal is to replace all current park ID signs in 2 phases and update the image
of our city, which is a major goal for City Council. Signage design was brought through a planning and
selection process approved by the Englewood Parks & Recreation Commission and City Council.
The timing of the design and installation phase for the signs will coincide with implementation of the City's
new logo that will result from the branding process currently under way.
Phase II for this project will consist of replacing 8 park identification signs in smaller parks and greenbelts
and providing for landscaping around the identification signs in 2016. The City of Englewood anticipates
submitting a grant request for this phase as well.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Matching grant funds for the project have been budgeted in the 2015 Open Space Fund .
Grant funding $200, 100
Matching funds $83,300
Total project funds $283,400
There are no Federal funds being used for this project.
LIST OF ATIACHMENTS
Proposed Bill for an Ordinance
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 2015
BY AUTHORITY
COUNCIL BILL NO . 24
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER ------
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
ACCEPTING A 2015 GRANT OF ARAPAHOE COUNTY OPEN SPACE PROGRAM FUNDS
PROJECT NAME: ENGLEWOOD PARKS GATEWAY ENHANCEMENTS -PHASE I,
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO AND THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO .
WHEREAS , the Parks Gateway Enhancements Project highlights a much overdue need to
replace seventeen signs that are currently comprised of 50 year old hand made identification signs
with a more modem, updated design for park identification signage with additional landscaping
surrounding the park signs; and
WHEREAS , Parks and Recreation staff believe these park ID signs are the gateway into each of
our neighborhood parks and are critical to identifying each of Englewood 's parks and will improve
the image of the City of Englewood; and
WHEREAS , the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended the design at their January
10 , 2013 meeting; and
WHEREAS , the City Council of the City of Englewood supported the City's Arapahoe
County Open Space (ACOS) Grant application for Park Gateway Enhancements Phase I by
passage of Resolution No . 5, Series 2015; and
WHEREAS, the City of Englewood was awarded the 2015 Grant of Arapahoe County Open
Space Program Finds Project Name: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements -Phase I in an
amount not to exceed $200 ,100 ; and
WHEREAS , the passage of this Ordinance authorizes the City of Englewood to accept the
Arapahoe County Open Space Grant for Park Gateway Enhancements Phase I; and
WHEREAS, there are no federal funds being used for this grant for Englewood Parks
Gateway Enhancements -Phase I.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes the
acceptance of the Arapahoe County Open Space 2015 Grant for Englewood Parks Gateway
Enhancements -Phase I, attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
1
Section 2. The Mayor is authorized to execute and the City Clerk to attest and seal the
Intergovernmental Agreement accepting a 2015 Grant of Arapahoe County Open Space Program
Funds Project Name: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements -Phase I, on behalf of the City of
Englewood, Colorado.
Section 3. No federal funds are being used for this grant for Englewood Parks Gateway
Enhancements -Phase I.
Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 15th day of June, 2015 .
Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City's official newspaper on the 18th day of
June, 2015 .
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City's official website beginning on the 17th day of
June, 2015 for thirty (30) days .
Linda Olson, Mayor Pro Tern
ATTEST :
Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk
I, Loucrishia A. Ellis , City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado , hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full , and passed on
first reading on the 15th day of June, 2015.
Loucrishia A. Ellis
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT REGARDING
2015 GRANT OF ARAPAHOE COUNTY OPEN SPACE PROGRAM FUNDS
PROJECT NAME: ENGLEWOOD PARKS GATEWAY ENHANCEMENTS -PHASE I
This Intergovernmental Agreement ("Agreement "), is made and entered into by and
between THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF
ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO , (the "County") and THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, a municipality and political subdivision of the State of Colorado (the
"Grantee") (collectively, "Parties" and individually a "Party").
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2003, and on November 1, 2011 , the voters of Arapahoe
County approved a county-wide sales and use tax to be deposited in the Arapahoe County Open
Space Fund and used for specified open space purposes as set forth in County Resolution No.
030381 , as amended by Resolution No. 110637 (Open Space Resolution); and
WHEREAS , the Open Space Resolution authorizes the County to award discretionary
grants from its Open Space Fund to municipalities and special districts , as more fully set forth
therein; and
WHEREAS, on May 12 , 2015 the County approved the Grantee 's Grant Proposal for the
Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements Phase I Project ("Grant Project"), which is attached
hereto and incorporated by reference herein as Exhibit A , subject to the execution of an
intergovernmental agreement and subject to the terms and conditions contained herein; and
WHEREAS , this intergovernmental agreement is authorized by Article XIV, Section 18
of the Colorado Constitution and COLO. REV. STAT.§ 29-1-203.
NOW, THEREFORE , the County and the Grantee agree as follows:
1. Amount of Grant. The County hereby awards Grantee an amount not to exceed
$200,100 ("Grant Funds") for the Grant Project from the Arapahoe County Open
Space Fund.
2. Use of Grant Funds. The Grantee agrees that it shall only use the Grant Funds for
the Grant Project, as described in Exhibit A.
3 . Disbursement of Grant Funds. Subsequent to execution of this Agreement, the
Grant Funds shall be paid via ACH transfer on a reimbursement basis upon
receipt of the approved status reports and documentation of expenditures as
outlined in Paragraph 10 below and no more often than quarterly. No more than
75% of the grant funds will be reimbursed prior to the Final Report approval. The
final 25% of grant funds will be reimbursed follO\ving the project inspection and
review and appro v al of the Final Report and project deliverables
3. Time for Use of Grant Funds. The Grantee agrees that the Grant Project must
begin within 45 days of the award notification. The Grantee agrees that the Grant
Project will be completed and the Grant Funds will be expended by no later than
1
E
x
H
I
B
I
T
1
two years from the date of this fully executed Agreement, unless a longer period
of time is otherwise agreed to by the County in writing . The Grantee understands
and agrees that if the Grant Project cannot be completed by the end of the agreed
upon time period the County may require that the Grant Funds be refunded to the
County Open Space Grant Fund, be re-distributed to another agency and/or be
used for another viable and timely grant project.
4. Interest on Grant Funds. The Grantee further agrees that , after receipt of the
Grant Funds, the Grantee will use any interest earned on the Grant Funds only for
the Grant Project as set forth in Exhibit A .
5. Administration of Grant Project. The Grantee shall be responsible for the direct
supervision and administration of the Grant Project. The County shall not be
liable or responsible for any cost overruns on the Grant Project, nor shall the
County have any duty or obligation to provide any additional funding for the
Grant Project if the Grant Project cannot be completed with the awarded Grant
Funds. Grantee also agrees to comply with all local, state and federal
requirements while completing the Project unless specifically waived .
7 .
8.
Grant Project Site Visits. Upon 24 hours written notice to the Grantee, the
Grantee agrees to allow the County to make site visits before , during , at the
completion of and/or after the Grant Project.
Acknowledgement of County by Grantee. The Grantee agrees to acknowledge
the County as a contributor to the Grant Project in all publications , news releases
and other publicity issued by the Grantee related to the Grant Project and agrees
to allow the County to do the same. If any events are planned in regards to the
Grant Project, the County shall be acknowledged as a contributor in the invitation
to such events . Grantee shall cooperate with the County in preparing public
information pieces, providing photos of the Grant Project from time to time, and
providing access to the Grant Project for publicity purposes . Event information,
event materials and press release information related to the Grant Project must be
sent to the County Grant Administrator for review and filing.
9. Required Sign at Project Site. The County agrees to purchase a standard sign for
each grant project. Grantee agrees to pay the sign cost to the County for each
grant project. Grantee agrees to erect and permanently maintain at least one sign
in a publicly visible area in recognition of the Grant from the Arapahoe County
Open Space Program. If the Grantee wishes to use their own sign and design, the
Grantee must submit the sign location, design , and wording to the County Grant
Administrator for approval prior to manufacture and/or installation of such sign.
Such sign shall be erected prior to the completion of the Grant Project or its
public opening , whichever is earlier.
10. Report Requirements. On or before January 3pt and July 3pt annually, the
Grantee agrees to provide the County with Grant Project Progress Reports that
conform to the format provided by the County. Each Grant Project Progress
Report shall include supporting financial documentation as requested in the form
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
provided. Upon completion of the Grant Project, the Grantee also agrees to submit
to the County a Final Report that conforms to the format provided by the County;
a final spreadsheet comparing the original budget to actual expenses that certifies
Grant Funds used in compliance with the Open Space Resolution ; and GIS data
with location and boundaries of the Grant Project. The Final Report shall also
include supporting financial documentation as requested in the County report
form and high resolution photographs of the progress and finished results of the
Grant Project. The Grantee further agrees to provide the County with digital
copies of said photographs, delivered as separate high resolution jpeg images.
The Final Report shall be submitted within three (3) months of Grant Project
completion unless a longer period of time has been agreed to by the County in
wTiting. The County shall be allowed to use information and images from these
reports in publications, public information updates, and on the County's web site .
11 . Failure to Submit Required Reports. Upon written notice from the County's Open
Space Grants Administrator , informing the Grantee that it has failed to submit any
required status report and /or final report , the Grantee shall submit such reports to
the County through the County 's Open Space Grants Administrator within thirty
(30) days , and , if it fails to do so , the Grantee shall be deemed to be in violation
this Agreement pursuant to Paragraph 15 , below.
12 . Record Keeping Requirements. The Grantee shall maintain a complete set of
books and records documenting its use of the Grant Funds and its supervision and
administration of the Grant Project. The County or any of its duly authorized
representatives shall have reasonable access to any books , documents , papers , and
records of the Grantee which are pertinent to the Grant Project for the purpose of
making an audit , examination, or excerpts. The Grantee shall keep all books,
documents , papers, and records , which are pertinent to the Grant Project, for a
minimum of three years.
13 . Changes to Grant Project. The Grantee agrees and understands that its Grant
Project, once it has been approved by the County , may not be changed without the
County 's prior approval. Proposed changes must be formally requested using the
applicable Grant Project Form provided by the County . Changes may not begin
until the County has issued an approval , which may also require the execution of
an amendment to this Agreement.
14 . Maintenance. Grantee agrees to assume responsibility for continuous long-term
maintenance and public safety of open space lands , trails , recreation facilities ,
amenities , signage or other projects funded by the Grant Funds .
15 . Failure to Complv and Reimbursement of Grant Funds. The Grantee understands
and agrees that the County may require the Grantee to reimburse the County if
any portion of the Grant Funds are not used in accordance with its approved Grant
Proposal and this Agreement. Failure to comply with the terms of this Agreement
shall result in default and the Grantee shall be ineligible for any future Grant
,..,
.)
Funds until the violation is remedied or after such other time period as determined
by the County.
16. Remedies. The rights and remedies of the County as set forth in this Agreement
shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights or remedies provided
by law.
17. No Waiver of Rights. A waiver by either Party to this Agreement of the breach of
any term or provision of this Agreement shall not operate or be construed as a
waiver of any subsequent breach by either Party.
18 . Relationship of the Parties. The Grantee shall perform all duties and obligations
under this Agreement as an independent contractor and shall not be deemed by
virtue of this Agreement to have entered into any partnership, joint venture ,
employer/employee, or other relationship with the County.
19 . No Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement shall give or allow any
claim or right of action whatsoever by any third party, including, but not limited
to, any agents or contractors of the Grantee.
20 . Severability. Should any one or more provisions of this Agreement be
determined to be illegal or unenforceable , all other provisions nevertheless shall
remain effective; provided, however, the Parties shall forthwith enter into good
faith negotiations and proceed with due diligence to draft a provision that will
achieve the original intent of the Parties hereunder.
21. Written Amendment Required . This Agreement may be amended , modified, or
changed, in whole or in paii, only by written agreement duly authorized and
executed by the County and the Grantee.
22. Venue. Venue for the trial of any action arising out of any dispute hereunder shall
be in Arapahoe County District Court, pursuant to the appropriate rules of civil
procedure .
23. Notices. Notices, as referred to in this Agreement , shall be sent to:
COUNTY: Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe County
5334 South Prince Street
Littleton, Colorado 80120-1136
and
Arapahoe County Attorney
5334 South Prince Street
Littleton, Colorado 80120-1136
and
Arapahoe County Open Space Grants Program Administrator
6934 S Lima St, Unit A
Centennial, Colorado 80112
4
•
•
•
•
•
•
and
GRANTEE:
City of Englewood
1155 W . Oxford Avenue
Englewood, CO 80110
24 . Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance
with the laws of the State of Colorado .
25. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts , each of
which will be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together will
constitute one and the same agreement.
26. Incorporation of Exhibits. Unless otherwise stated in this Agreement , any
exhibits , applications , resolutions , or other documents referenced in this
Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into this Agreement for all
purposes.
27 . Section Headings . The headings for any section of this Agreement are only for the
convenience and reference of the Parties and are not intended in any way to
define , limit or describe the scope or intent of this Agreement.
28 . Assignment. The rights , or any parts thereof, granted to the Parties herein may be
assigned only with the prior written consent of the non-assigning party.
29 . Extent of Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the
Parties hereto. The Parties agree that there have been no representations made
regarding the subject matter hereof other than those , if any , contained herein, that
this Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the
subject matter hereof, and further agree that the various promises and covenants
contained herein are mutually agreed upon and are in consideration of one
another.
30. Signatures . The signatories to this Agreement represent that they are fully
authorized to execute this Agreement and bind their respective entities .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the County and the Grantee have executed this Agreement as
of the date set forth below.
DATED this ____ day of _______ , 2015 .
ATTEST: GRANTEE:
5
By: ___________ _
Name
Title
ATTEST:
Randy P. Penn
Mayor
By: ___________ _
Name
Title
By: ______________ _
Name
Title
Loucrishia A. Ellis
City Clerk
COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE
STATE OF COLORADO
By: ---------------Sh a nn on Carter, Director, Intergovernmental
Relations and Open Spaces
Pursuant to Resolution No. 150211
6
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
t~~APAHOE COUi"dl V
COLORADO'S FIRST
2015 St andard Grant
Grant Proposal
Arap ah oe County Open Space
Cit y of fEngle~J~(i)d
P~rks an~ Recreatk»n De~a&i:mero~
Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase )
'\ ·~ ·,
. --
' . :· '. \..
' -.. ""'
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Englewood Parks
Gateway Enhancements (Phase I)
PART A-Application Summary Form
PART B-Minimum Qualifications and Eligibility Form
PART C-Application Checklist
PART D-Project Timeline
PART E-Project Budget
PART F-Project Details
PART G-Attachments
1. Resolution
2. Long-term Commitment Letter
3. Evidence of Property Ownership
4. Support Letters
5. Documentation of opposition and responses
6. Evidence of Commitment from funding partners
7. Photos
8.Site Maps
9. GIS shapefile
10. Other
• Council Communication 1999
• Request for Proposal-City Entryway Monumentation
• Suggested Scope of Work-City of Englewood Signage Projects-1999
~ Tacito Design-Design Intent Statement
• Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-May 2002
ci Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-October 2012
• Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-November 2012
• Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-January 2013
• Tacito Design-Total Design Fee Contract Amount
• PKM Design Group-Park Signage Graphics Invoice
Page 1
Page 3
Page 6
Page 1
Page 8
Page 12
Page 21
Page 22
Page 24
Page 25
Page 58
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 77
Page 80
Page 81
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 85
Page 86
Page88
Page90
Page92
Page 94
Page 95
I
•
•
•
•
•
•
2015 Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Application
Part A-Application Summary Form
Grant Category (check one):
X Standard
Small
This application will be scored on a 100-point scale by the evaluation committee and must
Score a minimum of 75 points.
Applicant Information
J Nam e: City of Englewood
Address: 1155 West Oxford Avenue, Englewood, CO 80110
Primary Contact: Dav e Lee I Title: Open Sp ace Manager
Telephone: 303-762-2687
J Email: dlee@englewoodgov.org
Primary Partner Information
{Additional partners should be discussed in Part F: Project Details, Question 13 of the application.)
Name: No Additional Partners
Address:
Contact : J Title:
Telephone:
Email:
Partner Responsibilities:
Project Information
Grant Category: Standard Grant
Project Type: Site Improvement Project
. Project Title: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase I)
Address: Belleview Park 5001 S. Inca St. Baker Park 2200 W. W es ley Ave. Emerson Park 2929 S.
Emerson St. Bates-Logan Park 2938 S. Logan St. Romans Park 1700 E. Floyd Ave. Cushing Park
700 W. Dartmouth Ave. Miller Field 3600 S. Elati St . Jason Park 4299 S. Jason St. Rotolo Park
4400 S. Huron St. Centennial Park 4630 $. Decatur St. Englewood, CO 80110
City or Unincorporated Arapahoe County: Englewood
GPS Coordinates: Belleview Park -39°37'27.36"N 104°59'57.93"W, Baker Park -39°40'23.83"N
110s0 00'49.18"W, Emerson Park -39°39'48.61"N 104°58'37.17"W, Bates-Logan Park-
I II I II I
1
39°39 50.35 N 104°58 52.46 W, Romans Park -39°39'23.89 'N 104°58'03.70"W, Cushing Park -
39°39'36.90"N 104°59'46.95"W, Miller Field -39°39'06.46"N 104°59'36.28"W, Jason Park -
I 39°38'23.83"N 104°59'59.30"W, Rotolo Park -39°38'09.59"N 104°59'50.52"W, Centennial Park
i -39°37'53.GO"N 1os 0 01'22.26"W
Grant Request: $200,100
I Cash Match Total: $83,300
I Total Project Amount: $283,400
I
2015 Standa rd/Small Gra nt App l icati o n
Page 1of 95
Percentage of Total Project: 29%
I
--
I
Brief Project Summary (400 words or less): project description, components, need, goal,
I The Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase I} demonstrate a much overdue need to replace 17
I signs that are currently comprised of 50 year old hand made park identification signs with a
I more modern, updated design for park identification signage with additional landscaping
1 surrounding the park signs. The community believes these park ID signs are the gateway into
each of our neighborhood parks and are critical to identifying each of Englewood's parks.
Replacement of the park ID signs will improve the image of the City of Englewood. The goal is
to replace all current park ID signs in 2 phases and update the image of our City, which is a
major goal for City Council. Signage design was brought through a planning and selection
process approved by the Englewood Parks & Recreation Commission and City Council.
Phase II for this project will consist of replacing 8 park identification signs in smaller parks and
greenbelts and providing for landscaping around the identification signs in 2016. The City of
Englewood anticipates submitting a grant request for this phase as well.
2015 Standard/Smal l Grant
Application Page 2 of 95
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Part B -Minimum Qualification and Eligibility Form
Certify the below minimum qualifications and eligibility criteria:
Applicant Name: City of Englewood
Application Category and Type: Standard Grant -Site Improvement Project
Project Name: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements
Briefly answer the following qualification questions:
1. Is applicant in good standing with Arapahoe County Open Space? Discuss past
performance (past five years}; discuss all on-going Arapahoe County Open Space Grants,
and the number and types of grants for which your agency is applying in this cycle.
The City of Englewood is in good standing with Arapahoe County Open Space. Over the
past 5 years, Englewood has received 6 grants. All grants have been completed within
the allotted time frame. The one exception is the River Run grant, which expanded in
project scope due to a major project sponsored by Urban Drainage and Flood Control
and South Platte Working Group. The project encompasses an area from Union Avenue
and the South Platte River to Oxford Avenue and the South Platte River.
Englewood currently has 2 on-~oing grants (Hosanna Synthetic Turf Field and Duncan
Park Redevelopment}. Both grants are in the final stages of completion with final reports
pending.
Englewood will apply for 2 standard grants this cycle. The grants are for River Run
Trailhead {Construction Project) Improvements and Park Gateway Enhancements
(Site Improvement).
2. Discuss project alignment with the Arapahoe County Open Space Master Plan; local
adopted Master Plan; or other approved planning documents.
The Open Space Master Plan provides a 100-year vision, 25-year master plan and 5-year
action plan for implementing the purpose and goals of the program. The vision states
that the County will be forward thinking, understand and embrace the open space, park
and trail needs of current residents, and define a harmonious relationship between
people and nature in the County for future generations. The vision for the Program is
summarized as: Healthy Lands, Hea lthy Communities, and Healthy People.
The Pa rk Gateway Enhanceme nts project comp l iments the mission of the Arapahoe
County Open Space Plan.
"' Acquire , conserve and protect open space -The Park Gateway Enhancements
project will contin ue to identify and protect Englewood Parks and open spaces .
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 3 of95
• Build county open space parks and trails -With updated and proper Park Gateway
Enhancements Englewood Parks will attract new users and help maintain a healthy
community.
• Cooperative partnership work -This project allows the continued partnership
between the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County Open Space and area groups such
as Englewood Unleashed and Pirate Youth Sports to strengthen the Englewood Park
system.
• Leverage funding for open space, parks and trails-The Park Gateway Enhancements
project will leverage funding sources from ACOS Grant Funds and Shareback Funds.
3. Describe how this project addresses specific objectives In the County Open Space
Resolution #030381/#110637. Document is pasted an the Open Space Grant Program
page of the County Website.
The Park Gateway Enhancements project specifically addresses the following objectives
of the County Open Space Resolution #030381/#110637.
•
• Preserve urban and rural open space and natural areas -Proper Identification and
wayfindlng improves the usagerOfcP.a n open spaces. This project will preserve
the Englewood Park systeml..~h ·d~ a 1!' park signage and encourage Increased
use through the attractlveJ'ieslgn o I~ ~fCf~n ~ of Arapahoe County. •
• Provide, maintain and lmP.ri>'e 11!fsn}orhooCf rks, open space, sports fields, picnic
facilities and biking, walklAg an~lti-use. 1_ The Park Gateway Enhancements
project will improve the ov"e ~a I. ge f,th1u~ark system. Gateway slgnage Is rather
like a first Impression. By re~la~ o tt5~J{1gnage with new designs will not only
unify the identity of the entire park •system but signify the quality of our parks.
Acknowledge the minimum quallflcatlon-co mS:O H!nU"llsted below.· All components are
required to meet minimum qualifications:
./ All items on the enclosed application checklist are Included In the application
./ All questions are answered in Part F and all supporting documents are attached In Part G
./ All budget forms are attached, completed and signed by the agency's highest authority
./ Application format and document order follow Instructions
./ Above eligibility and qualification questions are answered and meet Arapahoe County
Open Space eligibility requirements
./ All required forms are signed by agency's highest authority
./ Minimum cash match requirement met (29% of total project)
Applicant certifies that all of the above Items are included in the application and that all
Information submitted is true to the best of their knowledge.
Authorized Signature:~
(must be signed by hlg~uth~
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 4 of9S
Date: _f:..._.S_-A_~---•
•
•
•
Project Title: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase I)
Part B -Minimum Qualification and Eligibility Form (cont'd)
For Arapahoe County Use Only:
Initial Review Date (pre -qualification):----------------
e Minimum Qualifications Met (yes/no)?
o Past Performance and Status: eligible for funding, probationary status necessary (e.g.
special award terms or funding conditions), or ineligible:
• Application Contents, Formatting and Overall Presentation:
Grant Program Administrator Signature:---------------
Final Review Date (aft er evaluation):-----------------
• Minimum Score Met After Eva lu ation:
• Final Ranking and Recommendation After Evaluation:
e Comments :
Grant Program Administrator Signature:---------------
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 5 of95
Part C -Appllcatfon Checklist
Use the application checklist to verify that all of the required documents are Included In this
application In the order listed below. All sections are required to meet minimum qualifications .
./ Part A -Application Summary Form
./ Part B -Minimum Qualifications and Eligibility Form (must be signed)
./ Part C -Application Checklist (must be signed)
./ Part 0-Project Timellne
./ Part E -Project Budget Narrative and Forms (all forms must be completely filled out and
signed)
./ Part F -Project Details (narrative response to project questions}
./ Part G -Attachments (identify each attachment with the table of contents cover page
and list attachments In the following order)
1. Evidence of support from highest authority (official letter or resolution)-
including commitment to complete the project; statement that matching funds
are secured; and certification that the project wlll be open to the public or serve
a public purpose upon completion
2. Evidence of commitment ~lonS!t ~lntenance (official letter or resolution)
3. Evidence of property o'T?fs~cr s {legal documentation)
4. Evidence of community ~port1(1 . )'!rs port -maximum of 5)
5. Documentation of OPAA I on n · l!s1ir If applicable)
6. Evidence of commitm l)t · ding ~ft . rs (cash match/In-kind match
support letters) \ ([{).
7. Photos (pre-submittal)_.~
8. Site maps (project location maps)
9. GIS shapeflle, if applicable (Include on compact disc)
10. Other (clearly title: acquisition dooumentation Jif applicable, or other supporting
documents)
Applicant certifies that all of the above Items are included in the application, in the order listed
above, and that all information submitted is true to the best of their knowledge.
Authorized Signature:
(must be signed by hlg ~agency)
Print Name and Title: J;,.,,_ U ~~ i>.a~t'" t1V' .Ir' :e:, ·-'b~
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 6 of 95
Date: /-.S:-c.C
•
•
•
•
•
Part D -Projed Timeline (5 points)
Use the below project timeline samp le as a guide to complete your proposed project timeline.
Project timeline must be realistic to receive full point s.
Task Jun Jul Sep Oct
2015 2015 2015 2015
Grant I
I Notification I
IGA Signed I
Solicitation of
Vendors
Project Bid
I Award(s) I
Upper Sign
Manufacture
Ground/Site
Prep
Concrete Base
Installation
Upper Sign
Installation
Landscaping I
Final Report
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 7 of95
Nov Mar I Apr I May I Jun
I
Jul Aug Sep I 2015 2016 2016 I 2016 I 2016 2016 2016 2016
I I
I
! ;
I I I I I I !
I
I
I I
I
f
I
I
Part E-Project Budget Narrative and Forms (10 points)
Budget Narrative: Provide a clear and concise budget narrative for this project (250 words or
less).
The Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements (Phase I) project will construct 17 park
identification signs (8 large, 9 small signs) and include landscaping around each sign. Large sign
fabrication is estimated to cost $8,850 each sign, concrete base installation is estimated to cos t
$7,000 per sign and sign installation in the field is estimated to cost $1,218 per sign. Small sign
fabrication is estimated to cost $5,930 per sign, concrete base installation is estimated at
$6,390 per sign and sign installation in the field is estimated at $1,218 per sign. Landscaping
surrounding the signs is estimated to cost $490 per sign .
Budget Forms:
All project budget forms must be completely filled out following the rules and regulations set
forth in the application guidelines and instructions. Each budget form must be signed by the
highest authority in your agency and included in this section of the application. The following
project budget forms are attached and required to be complete and included in the application
to meet minimum qualifications:
• Summary Budget Form: The summary budget fprm must be fully completed and
successfully match up with the budget narrative, t~e grant budget form, the match
•
budget form and the selection criteria questions. •
• Grant Budget Form: The grant budget form m,ust be completed with sufficient detail to
be accepted. Please reference the sample budget for the expected level of detail.
Budget items are to be broken down into categories, and then broken down into the
detailed use of funds within each category by line item and cost .
• Match Budget Form: The match budget form must be completed with sufficient detail
to be accepted. Pl ease reference the sample budget for the expected level of detail.
Budget items are to be broken down into categories, and then broken down into the
detailed use of funds within each category by line item and cost. The match budget
form includes cash match and in-kind match. Only cash match counts toward the
percentage of match required. The cash match requirement is 25% of the total project
amount for Standard Grants an d 10% of the total project cost for Small Grants. In-kind
match is significant and sho w s partnership and community support for the project.
Administrative costs to prepare the grant appl i cation are not an eligible expense.
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 8 of95
•
• Part E -Summary .t Form
Sources of Funds Date Secured
Arapahoe County Open Space 15-Jun
Applicant match 15.Jan
Parks General Fund 2.Jul
ACOS Shareback 14-Dec
Appllcanb City of Englewood
·~~~:::
Requirements:·
} ' .
'
Toftil Proj«t'Amount:
;lnotlnd 'MOtcll:
rt«at PrOJed w/out 1n-1i1i;:d:.
' _,., .,.,. .. .,,,"""~~···~-,./
cash ·MatcJi~iiermntdie~uked: \. -~ .. -·· --.
"RftjuliiiifcilSJi t'Miltth>!'Anlouni:1
~ . -.-. _.,, ~ . ~
IPro/l!Ct Oiih MOkh -·--_
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 9 of95
j.,..---·
L:. .. ,,
I r .
County Grant
Request
$200,100
Cash Match
$66,700
$15,500
$1,100
Project Tltle1 Englewood Parks Gateway E
In-Kind Match
Yun
Name and Tltle: Dave Lee, Open Space Manager
$283 400,ooT . .•.-· ~
:$0.00i ....... -......... ~
'$2&3:406~0o l
,,.. ..... _.. ~i . "''"'" ..... ~
·~25:00%~
~-.,.~lr.· .. -... ~
is7o7sso:oo O•"f.~· ..... 'Ol,~t·~ ___ , ' ~$83~3ocioo1 Mli>iinuni;Met':;Y,or,'N
Total Project
Funds
$200,100
$66,700
$15,500
$1,100
2015
•
Part E-Grant Budget Form/Use of Funds
Category Detailed Use of Funds per Category
Large Sign (8 signs) Sign fabrication
Concrete sign base
Sign installation
Landscape
Small Sign (9 signs) Sign fabrication
Concrete sign base
Sign installation
Landscape
Applicants City of Englewood ..... -°9tj/f 'f&..>..
D•tr. $
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 10 of95 •
Grant Request Amount
70,800 $70,800
56,000 $0
9,700 $0
3,000 $3,000
53,400 $53,400
57,500 $57,500
11,000 $11,000
4,400 $4,400
$200,100
Pro.t-ct Tltle: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancem
Mamo and T10e1 Dave Lee, Open Space Manage
• •
• Part E -Match Budget For.h and In-kind
Category Detailed Use of Funds
Category
Sign design, color lasoprint,
Slgnage Design Fee large color output and
mountina
Landscape design fees for
Landscape Design Fee irrigated and non-irrigated
areas
Park Identification Signs Sign fabrication,
Concrete sign base,
Sign installation
Landscape
Appllcant: Oty of Enslewood ..... ='!?Cfatl .... :
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 11 of95
Source of Match Cash In-kind Total Amount
Parks Genera
Fund Budget 15,500 $15,500
ACOS
Shareback 1,100 $1,100
ACOS 0 $0 Shareback
A~U::S
Shareback 56,000 $56,000
ACOS 9,700 $9,700 Shareback
ACOS 1,000 $1,000 Shareback
Total $83,300 $0 $83,300
Project Tltle: Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements
Name and Tltle1 Dave Lee, Open Space Manager
•
Part F -Project Details (75 points)
Applicants must respond to all of the following questions to meet minimum qualifications. This
section is worth 75 points. Applicants must limit this section to 10 pages and answer all
questions to meet minimum qualifications. If attachments/supporting documentation apply to
a question answer please fully answer the question and reference the document in Part G.
Please do not answer a question as "N/A". If a question is not applicable, please explain why it
is not applicable to be considered for the full amount of points.
Select the Grant Category:
X Standard Grant: $50,100 -$300,000 funding opportunity, 25% of total project amount
minimum cash match requirement
Small Grant: $100 -$50,000 funding opportunity, 10% of total project amount
minimum cash match requirement
Select the Project Type:
Project Type/Project Details: The project categor:ies for the standard and small grant
applications are below:
•
Trail Project: Projects that are mostly trail construction or renovation/restoration, trail-•
related bridges, trail-related road crossings, or trail head parking and shelters.
X Site Improvement Projects: Projects for site improvement, restoration and
repair/replacement including: natural re""vegetation/restoration, park improvements,
restoration, repair/replacement (may include playgrounds, shelters, sport fields,
landscaping). This category may include interior trail segments or connections, but the
majority of the project should be site improvements other than trail.
:-i Construction Project: Construction projects may. include new park amenities such as
playgrounds, shelters, sport fields, restrooms, and interior trails or connections.
Acquisition Project (standard grant only): Eligible projects involve fee simple
acquisition of land for public open space, park or trails; acquisition of buffer land;
acquisition of a conservation easement and/or acquisition of water rights.
Environmental Project/Cultural Education or Interpretation Project: Projects focused
on environmental or cultural education/interpretation installations may include
associated sign bases, panels, landscaping, benches and shelters.
"-Other Project: Other allowable project categories include: stream-related projects,
wildlife habitat, and water quality. These projects should not fit into any of the other
project categories. Please contact the County Grant Administrator for questions related
to allowable projects.
Selection Criteria Questions (75 points):
1. Describe the project goal, extent of scope and expected results. Be specific; discuss
what the project will provide, quantities, size, project elements, useful life of project
components, and deliverables. Discuss the current condition of the project site and
what improvements or changes are being proposed and why. Provide detailed maps
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 12 of 95
•
•
•
•
and photos in Part G. Describe how the project will be designed, constructed and
managed and how you will choose vendors, materials, systems, etc. Describe how this
project improves access and connectivity to any existing trail network, natural
resources, and/or community resources. If this is an educational project, discuss the
long term educational outcomes expected as a result of this project and how the project
connects people to each other, the natural environment and/or community resources.
Complete the budget form in Part E consistent with this narrative (15 points)
Gateway enhancements include replacement of 50 year old hand-made park
identification signs with updated, modern design park identification signage with
additional landscaping surrounding the park signs. The community believes these park
ID signs are the gateway into each of our neighborhood parks and are critical to
identifying each of Englewood's parks. Replacement of the park ID signs will improve the
image of the City of Englewood. The goal is to replace all current park ID signs in 2
phases and update the image of our City, which is a major goal for City Council. Phase I
will include the following parks: Belleview, Baker, Emerson, Bates-Logan, Romans,
Cushing, Miller, Jason, Rotolo and Centennial Parks.
The Phase I scope for the project is to replace 17 park ID signs in 10 different parks. This
project also includes landscape ~nhance!'Tlents surrounding each identification sign .
There are 2 sign design sizes (one large, 9he sm~ll). The large gateway signs (8) will be
constructed in community parks and ·'the small.signs (9) will be constructed in
neighborhood parks and at seconda'ry entries io community parks. The large sign
dimensions are approximately 9 feet wide by 6 Yi · feet tall. The small signs are
approximately 6 feet wide by 4 Yi feet tall. Each sign is non-illuminated, aluminum
construction on a cast concrete base with a 6 inch mow strip around the base. The
paint for the aluminum is acrylic polyurethane graffiti resistant in "Federal Green",
"warm white" and "brushed aluminum" colors. life expectancy for the project is
estimated to be 20 years.
The Gateway Enhancement project will be advertised for competitive sealed bid. Bid
specifications will be developed and advertised on Rocky Mountain Bid Net. A vendor
will be selected based on the price of their bid and experience constructing such a
project.
The Gate way Enhancement project will update and improve the overall image of
Englewood Parks & Recreation and the City of Englewood . The project will also improve
access and connectivity by more clearly and prominently identifying Engle wood Parks to
automotive, bicycle and pedestrian traffic.
2. Describe the community/neighborhood and user groups the project will serve. Discuss
the type of users (children, adults, seniors, families, sports leagues, youth groups, etc.)
the project will serve and estimate the number of user groups annually that will benefit
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 13 of 95
from the project. How did you arrive at this estimate? De scribe the service area for this
project (how far will users travel to use the project site). (5 points)
The Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements will serve the Englewood community, the
surrounding neighborhoods and all park users from outside of Englewood. Englewood
parks are visited by many families, adults, seniors, youth and adult sports leagues. The
gateway enhancements will provide Englewood with a new branding image for our
parks and clearer, more obvious identification for our parks. A recent citizen survey
from the 2014 Community Livability Report Englewood, CO stated that 88% of
Englewood's 31,676 citizens use our parks. Englewood parks are locally renowned and
receive many visitors from around the metro area.
3. Describe any scenic, historic or cultural values associated with this project. Will they be
preserved or restored? Describe specific natural resources at the site, including habitat
and/or water. List predominant wildlife species and vegetation on site. Discuss impacts
to these resources as a result of this project. If this is a conservation easement
acquisition project, describe the conserv~tion values and public benefits/value of the
land, easement or water resource. (5golnts)
•
There are no scenic, historic or cultural val\J~s associated with the Englewood Parks •
Gateway Enhancements. The ten par:k ldcations are comprised of typical suburban park
natural resources, habitat and waten The par:k_s ar~ all irrigated and contain the typical
bluegrass turf and native/non-native tre'e species (cottonwood, oak, ash, linden, spruce,
Austrian and ponderosa pine speGi_es} found al9ng the Front Range. Belleview, Cushing
and Centennial Parks respectively contain a small stream, a pond and a lake. The habitat
value of these parks would be categorized as low. Typical bird species include sparrows,
robins, finch, geese, etc. Animal species include fox, coyote, skunk, rabbit, etc. Impacts
to the natural resources are considered to be extremely low.
4. Discuss the ownership and legal access to the proposed project site, including right of
access without trespassing on adjacent property. Detail any third-party rights,
easements or other encumbrances that exist. Provide supporting documentation
proving ownership, legal access or permission from landowner and a site map in Part G.
{3 points)
The listed parcels of property: Belleview Park-5001 S. Inca St. Baker Park-2200 W.
Wesley Ave. Emerson Park-2929 S. Emerson St. Bates-Logan Park-2938 S. Logan St.
Romans Park-1700 E. Fl oyd Ave. Cushing Park -700 W. Dartmouth Ave. Miller Field-3600
S. Elati St. Jason Park-4299 S. Jason St. Rotolo Park-4400 S. Huron St . Centennial Park-
4630 S. Decatur St. are located in Englewood, Colorado. The City of Englewood is the
sole owner of these parcels. Vehicle access to the locations will be provided by current
public streets. No third party rights, easements or other encumbrances will affect this •
project. The City of Englewood owns all park property and is managed by the Parks and
2015 St a nd ard/Small Grant Application
Page 14 of 95
•
•
•
Recreation Department. Arapahoe County parcel search ownership verification
is located Part G.
5. Describe long-term maintenance of the project site. Estimate the annual costs to
maintain the site, how those numbers were calculated, how you intend to fund
maintenance and who is responsible for maintenance. Explain how maintaining this
project site changes your agency maintenance budget. (Provide projected budget
changes, detailed cost estimates, how you plan to accommodate these changes, and
explain how you arrived at those numbers.) Provide a commitment letter from the
management/maintenance agency addressing long-term maintenance and include
budgeting for funding maintenance in Part G. (7 points)
The City of Englewood owns all park property and the Parks and Recreation Department
will be responsible for the long-term maintenance of every park, all landscape
enhancements and sign age for the project. The City of Englewood annually allocates
funding in the Parks and Recreation Department budget for personnel, commodities and
capital for regular repair and maintenance for all park infrastructures, amenities and
facilities. The 2015 Parks Division Maihten~nce .. Budget is $2,137,252. The Parks
Department currently maintains approximate,ly 25,0 acres of parkland, open space and
green space and the parks gateway ehhantem~nts are not estimated to increase the
~ (.---~ '
overall maintenance budget for many ye~ns due to the low maintenance cost materials
used in the project (concrete ~'1d powder coat¢d 1al1Jminum). Landscape designs were
added with the goal of keeping maintenance costs low. The maintenance ofthe
landscaping will also be absorbed,intp the existi~g parks budget for 2015 as these areas
do not result in a significant increase ih area or plant material to manage.
6. Summarize planning efforts to date and investments made prior to submitting a grant
proposal. Discuss pre-submittal meetings, dates and outcomes. Be detailed and include
eligible pre-planning costs on the Match Budget Form in Part E. See application
instructions for details. Proof of pre-submittal planning expenses must be submitted as
an attachment in Part G. All attachments should be clearly labeled on the Part G cover
page. (5 points)
Planning for the park gateway signage initially started in 1999. The Cit y of Englewood
was interested in strengthening the community image and heightening awareness of
Englewood. Tacito Design Inc. was se lected for design development of entry port
monumentation, city district signage design and park gateway signage enhancements .
An advisory committee was formed to help guide the process and to communicate with
their constituencies in the community. The advisory committee was comprised of policy-
makers, local merchants, residents and City staff .
In early 2002, four park signage design concepts were developed at a cost of
$15,500 (see Part E and G) and in May 2002, Tacito Design met with the Englewood
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 15 of 95
Parks and Recreation Commission and selected a park signage design concept. In the
next number of years, the economy began to contract and Englewood went through a
number of years of budget freezes and reductions. The project was put on hold due to
a lack of funding resources.
In 2013, the City was awarded a $250,000 grant from Arapahoe County for the
redevelopment of Duncan Park. As part of that project, the new park gateway signage
enhancements were incorporated into the redevelo pment of Duncan Park. Due to the
success of this park redevelopment in the fall of 2014 and the input received from
citizens and policy-makers, the City would like to move forward with updating and
enhancing all park gateway signage.
As part of the Gateway Enhancements project, options for landscape designs were
drawn up by PKM Design Group at an expense of $1,100. (see Part E and G).
7. Is this project "shovel ready"? Provide evidence that this project will be completed
within two years. Is design and engineeri n~ complete or is there still work to be done?
list any permits that will need to be -obtained for implementation of the project and
existing status of obtaining those permits. (Fe d eral 404, County or City Planning or
•
Public Works, Storm Water Drainage, etc). Does the project necessitate a change in •
zoning? Itemize anticipated costs for 'permits, g9verhment fees and consultants. Detail
costs in the correct Part E Budget For'rri . Correlate response with the Project Timeline in
Part D. Project timeline must be reaii~ie to receive full points for this question. If this is
an acquisition project, list the due diligence item-s you already have available or will
pursue (such as purchase agreement, preliminary title work, appraisal, environmental
site assessment, survey, etc). Purchase agreement or option with seller and preliminary
title work should be secured and included in the -application and attached in Part G.
Include detailed costs in Part E. (5 points)
The Parks Gateway Enhancements project is "shovel ready" if selected as a grant award.
Design and engineering has been completed. Landscaping designs have been
completed. Two park ID signs have already been constructed as part of a previous ACOS
grant award during the redevelopment of Duncan Park. After reviewing the project with
the City Planning and Public Works Departments, there are no permits, government fees
or zoning changes required.
8. Describe the planning process that identified this specific project as a priority. Is this
project listed as a priority in a master p lan, site specific plan or other adopted planning
document? If so, discuss that plan. Describe the relationship of the project to any local,
regional, state or system-wide master plan . Give the name of each plan and list related
e lement{s) within the plan. Was this project identified through an ind ependent
community planning process? Describe this process. (5 points) •
20 15 Sta ndard/S mall Gr ant Ap plicat ion
Page 16 of 95
•
•
•
This project was identified through an independent community planning process by the
City's Community Development Department. During the planning process that started in
1999 through 2002, the City was desirous of a sign age plan that would blend the various
signage needs (Civic Center, Entry Port, District and Park Identification) throughout the
City in one uniform design theme. Unfortunately, the project was put on hold due to a
lack of funding resources.
Recently, the economy has begun to improve and Duncan Park was redeveloped with
help from a grant from Arapahoe County Open Spaces and the use of shareback funds.
New park identification signage was constructed in Duncan Park that has now raised the
priority of making all park identification sign age uniform by replacing all of the existing
50 year old park signs.
This grant request is not a typical site improvement project which would be included in
a long range planning document. This project has been an issue for over twenty years as
our current park identification sign age has, become very outdated. Due to more
pressing City of Englewood commitments and priorities as well as the economy, this
project has not been funded bcit has been.tJ1oroughly reviewed and would be a
welcomed project by the residents of Englewoo~ ahd Arapahoe County.
Even though this project is not listed i,n a specific planning document, parks gateway
enhancements are fundamental to P,ark usage. This enhancement project creates a
community identity with the park system, welcomes new users and establishes the level
of care and maintenance that is provided in our parks.
9. Discuss any efforts to obtain public input, disseminate public information, develop
partnerships, develop partnerships for cash finding or in-kind contributions, and garner
community support specifically related to this project. In most cases, evidence of a
transparent public process will be required. For acquisitions, the process may be tied to
a public process for an overall master plan rather than identification of a specific parcel.
For reg ional trails, the process may need to include notification and/or involvement of
residents from adjacent jurisdictions. Disc uss any objections or opposition to this
project. Include any letters, petitions, news articles, or other documents evidencing
opposition. What has been done to address concerns and how has the opposition
responded? (5 points)
Planning for the park gateway si gnage initially started in 1999. The City of Englewood
was interested in strengthening the community image and heightening awareness of
Englewood. Tacito Design Inc . was selected for design development of entry port
monumentation, district signage design and park gateway signage enhancements.
2015 Standard/Small Grant App l ication
Page 17 of 95
An advisory committee was formed in 1999 to help guide the process and to
communicate with their constituencies in the community. The advisory committee was
comprised of policy-makers, local merchants, residents and City staff.
In 2002, the Englewood Parks & Recreation Commission selected a park signage design
concept . The Commission is an advisory board made up of Englewood citizens who
guide public policy for the Parks and Recreation Department and make
recommendations as public input to Englewood City Council.
During Parks and Recreation Commission meetings held between October 2012 and
January 2013, parks sign age was again reviewed and approved in order to have new
sign age in place for the Duncan Park Redevelopment grant (meeting minutes are
attached Part G -10. Other).
Along with the successful redevelopment of Duncan Park, the new park identification
signs have received a great deal of attention from folks throughout Englewood. Many
citizens have requested that the gateway signs to their nearby parks receive the same
upgrades.
All Parks and Recreation Commission meetings are open to the public and their
comments and input are invaluable in addressing any public concerns. We have received
no objections or opposition toward this proposed project.
10. Describe how this project addresses inclusivity per the Americans with Disabilities Act
guidelines. (3 points)
Parks Gateway Enhancements is an atypical project that does not fall into the guidelines
of ADA. The project is a gateway enhancement that allows all individuals to identify
specific Englewood parks and to enjoy all the amenities each park has to offer.
11. Discuss the need and urgency for this project and why it is a priority. What opportunities
are lost if this project is not funded now? (5 points)
•
•
The need and urgency for this project is great. The project was started 16 years ago and
has stalled several times due to the economy and lack of sufficient budget funding in
recent years. The City is cu rren tly embarking on a new era of identifying who we are
and what services we provide to our citizens through the development of a new mission
and vision statement: To promote and ensure a high quality of life, economic vitality
and a uniquely desirable community identity by proactively collaborating with our •
citizens and businesses, developing a safe environment, creating opportunity and
through the provision of reliable, affordable and flexible services.
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 18 of 95
•
•
•
City Council has given approval for the Parks Gateway Enhancements as an initial step
towards this new mission and vision.
If the project is not funded now, it will likely lose its priority standing as other City
departments compete for City Council endorsement and funding .
12. If successful in obtaining this grant, how will the agency use this project to inform
citizens about the value of the Arapahoe County Open Space sales and use tax? Address
the public outreach plan, signage plan, celebration, dedication, etc. (2 points)
The Parks Gateway Enhancements Project is about creating an identity. As recognition
of the grant funding and support, permanent signage identifying ACOS has been
incorporated into the design of all 18 signs and will be installed as part of gateway
enhancements at all 10 park locations. Approved sign designs are attached in Part G -
10.
Information will also be added to the City of Englewood's web site identifying the
project and funding sources during arid foll,owing construction. The Englewood
Herald will run information and a news steri~_s throughout the project. Social media
such as Face book and Twitter will b 'e usep tb provid,e project updates, recognize
accomplishments and promote funding partners. ;
• ,' i
13. How much of your planned cash match is secured? How much still needs to be raised
and what are your plans for raising additional funds? What is your back up plan if you
are unable to raise those funds? Describe the cash and in-kind partnerships established
for this project. This does not include partners who have contributed to previous
phases or partners that plan to contribute to future phases. Explain if partnerships were
not possible or necessary for this project. Include all partner support letters in Part G
and clearly label on the section cover page. Include match from all partners in the Part E
Budget. All support letters must be dated within the last six months to be eligible.
(5 points)
The entire cash match is secured. We are planning on using Arapahoe County Shareback
Funds. There are no other cash or in-kind partnerships with this project. Partnerships
were not possible for the gateway enhancements in ten park locations at this time.
14. Briefly discuss support from entities and user groups that are supporting the project in
other w ays than cash or in-kind contributions. Support letters should come from users,
user groups, community members, volunteers, schools, etc. A maximum of five (5)
support letters should be attached in Part G and clearly labeled on the section cover
page. All letters should be dated within the last six months. (5 points)
Englewood has broad based support for the Parks Gateway Enhancements project.
Englewood Unleashed is a community dog park advocacy group. Their goal is to
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 19 of95
enhance the off-leash parks within Englewood. The group raises funds for improvements
within off-leash parks, performs monthly park cleanups and ensures that pet owners are
responsible stewards of the parks .
Pirate Youth Sports is a local non-profit organization that serves Englewood youth by
providing a variety of sports activities in many of our parks. Improved park signage
would improve identification of parks and athletic fields used by Pirate Youth Sports and
visiting sports organizations.
Englewood Schools serves our community's academic and athletic needs for youth. The
City and school district partner on shared use of numerous sports fields and tennis
courts.
Mr. Glllit Is a community member and citizen advocate for our parks. He resides
adjacent to one of our larger community parks and Is a huge supporter of our Parks and
Recreation programs.
Douglas Garrett is an Englewood dtliel!Jln ~man of the Englewood Parks and
Recreation Commission. Dougl;sfand •thY th{ commission unanimously support
the Gateway Enhancements a{p_raJ r vs a ~ f entity Improvement to Englewood's
parks.
Certification of accuracy for the Information provleled In Part F:
Applicant certifies that all of the above answers are accurate and that all information submitted
is true to the best of their knowledge.
Authorized Signature: ~2
(must be signed by high 7tC1UthOritYif1ncy)
Print Name and Title: ..t;_ U.3 ~ )>."-~ ~~ ui::.11r-Jt-~._,
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 20 of95
Date: /-r/.r-
•
•
•
•
•
•
Part G -Attachments (10 points)
Use this as the table of contents cover page for the required application attachments.
Attachments in this section are supporting documentation to the questions answered in Part F.
To receive the full amount of points available for each question, sufficient supporting
documentation must be attached. List all attachments in order, by name/title and by page
number.
1. Evidence of support from highest authority {official letter or resolution**) -
including commitment to complete the project; statement that match funds are
secured; and certification that the project will be open to the public or serve a
public purpose upon completion
2. Evidence of commitment to long-term maintenance (official letter or resolution)
3. Evidence of property ownership/legal access {legal documentation}
4. Evidence of community support (letters of support -max. 5, known objections)
5. Documentation of oppostition and responses (if applicable)
6. Evidence of commitment from funding partners (cash match/in-kind match
support letters)
7. Photos (pre-submittal)
8. Site maps {project location maps)
9. GIS shapefile, if applicable (i11ch.ide on compact disc)
10. Other {clearly title: acquisition do.cumentation, if applicable, or other supporting
documents)
**Resolution from a Governing Body or an Official Letter from Highest Authority m ust include
all listed applicable items and must designate a specific person to sign the grant agreement and
related grant administration documents.**
201 5 St andard/Small Gra nt Application
Page 21 of95
Part G Attachments -1. Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. _5_
SERIES OF 2015
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CITY'S ARAPAHOE COUNTY OPEN SPACE
GRANT APPLICATION FOR PARK GATEWAY ENHANCEMENTS PHASE I
WHEREAS, the Parks Gateway Enhancements Project highlights a much overdue need to
replace seventeen signs that are currently comprised of 50 year old hand made park identification
signs with a more modern, updated design for park identification signage with additional
landscaping surrounding the park signs; and
WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation staff believe these park ID signs are the gateway into each
of our neighborhood parks and are critical to identifying each of Englewood's parks and will
improve the image of the City of Englewood; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended the Tacito Design for this
project at the May 91.b, 2002 meeting; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission again recommended the design at the
October 1llh,2012, November 15111, 2012 and January 10 , 2013 meetings; and
WHEREAS, there are no federal funds being used for the Park Gateway Enhancements Phase
1 project; and
WHEREAS, the City's Arapahoe County Open Space grant application will request $200,100
in grant funds with a required City cash match of $83,300. Englewood sbareback funds have
been budgeted; and
WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation will bring back an IGA if approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TIIB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes the
application for an Arapahoe County Open Space Grant for Park Gateway Enhancement attached
hereto as Exhibit A.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 20th day of January, 2015.
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 22of95
Penn, Mayor
•
•
•
•
•
•
I, Loucrishia A Ellis, City Clerk for the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify the
above is a true copy of Resolution No._£__, Series of2015 .
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 23 of95
Part G Attachments -2. Long-Term Maintenance
c T y 0 f ENGLE\NOOD
D E PAR T M f NT Of PA R !<S AN O R &C:R ~ATI O N
.Arapahoe Cou~ty Open Space and Tralls Advisory Board
6934 South Unia Street, Unit A
Centennial, COBOlll
December 1, 2014
Re: Lons·Term Park Maintenance
Dear Open Space Advisory Boarrl ,
"The City of Eng ewood Parks and Recreation Department Is committed to the long. term maintenance
.and management of all Englewood parks and parlc Infrastructure within the City. The City cf E~ewood
.allocates funds for the long·term maintenance, repair and replacement of park fnfrasttucture. Ongoing
maintenance functions !ndude: sign maintenance, sfsn repair/replacement, graffiti removal and
landscape ma i11tenance.
1'he Parks and Recreation Department Is funded aMually chrougb the Oty of Englewood's Genem Fund
as part of the co~ services provided to the dtizens or the City of Engklwood. Maintenance of the
Englewood Parks Gateway Enhancements Is currently lncruded In all long-term maintenance programs
.and activltfes and wiH ccntl nu e to be a part of 111 such activities Into the future.
Jerrell Blade
Parks and Recrea tion Director
~ 135 W Oxl'0td A.~er~u" Er.gt;:\\~ Colorado BUI 10 FiY..ine 303 ·752·2 500 Fax 3ol-762-:i6eii
2015 Sta ndard/Small Grant Applicatio n
Page 24 of95
,..,.,... ensle-......a.,w .ors
•
•
•
.~:~achments -~~idence of property ow~_ersh ~-------------
City of Engfe od
Warren
Ba ilie
Iliff II'=:.=
Wesley
Baker j~;;;;;~f~b
Harvard
Vassar f!!!:!~~~lt
College
ENGlEWOOD PARKS AND
RECREATION SYSTEM
Centennial
Cushing
Baker
Jason
Miller Field
Duncan
Em er.ion
Romans
Rotolo
Bates·Logan
GREENBELT·DRAINAGE
WAYS
Harb Hosanna -
Alhlatic Comp:ex
Barde
Clarkson Amherst
Northwest Greenbelt
Southwest Greenbe ·1
SWIMMING POOLS
Sinclair Jr tfigh Schcol
Englewood High SchoO i
GOLF COURSE
River Goll Course
CENTERS
Malley Sr. Center
n
I
City of Englewood
Department of Parks and Recreation
1155 W. Oxford Avenue
Englewood, CO 80110
Englewood Rec Center I
I
12015 Standard/Small Grant
!Application Page 25 of 95 /'>ft'>\ -,e" "~nn _ 1"'"'"''\ ~I!!'"" ftl!!'ftn ~av
Arapahoe County Parcel Number Information
Belleview Park
033752325
031992184
034389211
Centennial Park
031978165
031978246
031978238
031978173
032594322
032620269
031978416
Cushing Park
033564561
033564545
Baker Park
031002621
2015 Standard/Sma ll Grant App li cation
Page 2 6 of 95
Jason Park
031964547
031964555
Miller Field
031943281
Emerson Park
031035112
Romans Park
031045665
Rotolo Park
031987326
Bates-Logan Park
031012996
•
•
•
•
•
•
20 15 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 27 of 95
Belleview Park
033752325
031992184
034389211
j
/
!
-f"
I
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 28 of 95
Belleview Park
033752325
031992184
034389211
•.
•
•
•
• Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Pagel of I
•
•
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full Owner List:
Owner Address:
Cfty/State/Zip:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
Legal Desc:
2014 Appraised Vslue
2014 As:iessed Value
033752325
20n-09+00-015
1500 W Layton Ave
Englewood
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Englewood Ind Area
3537.00
47 .2400
That Part Of Se 1/4 Sec 9-5-68 Oesc As Beg 37 Ft E & 1054 Ft N Of Sw Cor Of Sd Se 1/4 Th E
308.26 Ft Th Se 648 Ft 4.09 Ft & 287.91 Ft Th N 93. 79 Ft Th Se 511.4 Ft Th S 210.56 Ft Th E
146.5 Fl & 96.3 Ft Th N 10 Ft Th Ne 98.8 Ft Th S To A Pt On N Line Of W Belleview Ave Th E
326.78 Ft & 300.4 Ft To W Line Of S Inca Dr Th Nw AJg Sd W Row Line 240.5 Ft & 293.75 Ft Th
Ne 63.42 Ft Th Nw 144.75 Ft Th Ne
Total
24,693.293
7,161,055
Building
0
0
2013 Mill Levy:
land
24,693,293
7,161,055
72.800
Land Line Units Land Value Land Use
47.2400 AC 24,693,293 Recreation
Note Land Une data above corresponds lo the lnlflal appraised value end does nol reflect subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any.
• Nol aft parcels have aval iable photos I sketches
In some eases a sketch may be dffficuH lo read. Please conlad !he Assessors Office fOf' esslstanee. Measurements taken from the exterior of the build
The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty !he eccuracy of any &ketch, nor assumes any responsibility or Hablflty to any ~er.
Al thoujjh some pan:els may have mu lllpfe buildings and photos, at this lime our system Is limited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per pv..el number. SOfTy fOf'
Inconvenience .
New Sea rch
2015 Standard/Small Grant Appl ication
Arapahoe County -Parcel Search
New Search
PIN:
AJN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full Owner List:
Owner Address:
City/State/Zip:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
031992184
2077-09-4-00-01 4
*Photo I View Parcel Map
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Englewood Ind Area
3537.00
2.1740
Page 1of1
Prin ter Frie
Treasurer'!
lnfonn
Sales by Tax Yeai
Neighbon
2013/
2011'
2009/
2007(
2005/
Complete Neighbor!
Sales Information Hi
Tax District L1
Legal Desc: Beg 1035 Ft E & 30 Ft N Of Sw Cor Se 1/4 Th N 370 Ft Th Nw 287.91 Ft Th S 577.11FtThE21
Ft To Beg Sec 9-5-68
2014 Appraised Value
2014 Assessed Value
Ss!e
Total
1,136,400
329,556
Book Page
A713 6443 •Multi Sdled
3619 0343 *Multi Sched
3443 0484
Building
0
0
2013 Mill Levy:
Date
10-24-1997
04-01-1982
07-01-1981
Land
1,136,400
329,556
72800
Price
395,000
1,004,900
355,166
LEll!d Une Units Land Value Land Use
94700.0000 SF 947,000 Recreation
Type
DE ED
WARR
WARR
Note Land Une date above corresponds to the initial apprais!!d value and does not renect subs..cquen/ appeal relatad eojustments, if any
• Not all parcels t\ave avaHable photos I skalches
In &0me cases a skelth may be dlflicult to read Please contact the Assessors Olfics for assistance . Measurements taken from tile exteri« of !he bull
The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does nol warranty the accuracy of any sketch, nor assumes any respcnsibllity or ilabli!ty to eny user.
A!lhough some parcels may t\ave multlple buildings. and pho!cs, al this lime our system Is timlted to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number . Sony lo
Inconvenience
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
P::i~e ~Oof95
New Searc h
•
•
•
• Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Pagel of I
•
•
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full Owner List
Owner Address:
Clty/State/Zfp:
Neighborhood;
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
Legal Desc:
2014 Appraised ValU#J
2014 Assessed Value
034389211
2077 -09-4-07-020
1225 W Belleview Ave
Englewood
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Englewood Ind Area
3537.00
3.0610
Lots 1-4 Blk 1 Mavdon Sub ·----------·-·---------··· ........ -.. --·---------.
Total
1,333,440
386,698
Building
0
0
2013 Miii Levy:
Land
1,333,440
386,698
72.800
Land UM Units Land Value Land Use
133344.0000 SF 1,333,440 Vacant Commercial Lots
Note Land Une data above corresponds to the Initial appraised value and does not reflect S!Jbsequent appeal rel11ted adjustments, if any
..... ·-···--··-· ..... ----~· ·"-----------·-------~-... --.--------------------· ............... .
• Not aB parcels have available pholos I skelches
In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance. Measurements taken from lhe exlerlor of the buifd
The Arapahoe County AssesBOfS Otlice does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responsibUity or llablYty to any user.
Although some parcels may have multiple bulklings and photos, at !his lime our system ls limited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. SolTy for
inconvenience
New Search
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 32of95
--. ..... -.... -..... n1r-~-·-~--··----
i
Centennial Park
031978165
031978246
031978238
031978173
032594322
032620269
031978416
I I ~
\
\
\ \. i
'... "t "-,1 '. ' .; "-', I \.. : ~ i p~
I t .
-...j
•
.
I ~-· i
•
•
• Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page I of 1
•
•
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full Owner List:
Owner Address:
City/State/Zip:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
Legal Oesc:
2014 Appraisad Value
2014 Assessed Value
031978165
2077-08-1-00-029
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Vacant Unplatted Parcels
2942.00
7.0600
Parcei Of Land In S 1 /2 Ne 1 /4 Sec 8 Oesc As Beg 400.2 Ft E Of Nw Cor S 1/2 Ne 1 /4 Th Se
1355.88 Ft To Pl On N Line OfW Union Ave Th E Alg Sd Line 660 Ft MIL W Of E Line Of Ne 1/4
Sec 8 Th N 130 Ft Th W 1021.87 Ft Th Nw 1232.53 Ft Th W 130 Ft To Beg 8-5-68
Total
3,530
1,024
·-------~-·-
Bull ding
0
0
2013 Mfll Levy:
--------------------
Land
3,530
1,024
68749 -. -----... --·-. . ----· _ .. ----··· -·-··--·-·-------------------· ------------.... ---·-·-_,,_ -----
Llmd Una Units Land Value Land Use
7.0600 AC 910,740 Vac Unplatted Area> 5.0 Acres but< 10.0
Acres
Nole Lend Line data above corresponds to the Initial appraised value and does not reaect sub$eqt1enl appeal related adjuslments, if sny.
• Not au parcels have avaHable photos I sketches
In some cases a sketch may be dillicull lo raad. Please contact the Assessors Office for asslstaflee Measurements taken from tile elderlor of the bulfd
The Arapahoe County Assessors Oflica does not warranty the accuracy of any sketdt, nor assumes any responslblllty or llabHlty lo any user.
Although some parcels may have multiple bulldfngs and photos, at this time our system ls limited to 1 sketch and 1 pfloto per pan:el number. Sony for ,
Inconvenience.
New Search
Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page 1of1
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full Owner Ust
Owner Address:
City /State/Zlp:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
Legal Desc:
2014 Appraised Value
2014 Auessed Value
Sale
Land Line
·---~-.~------------.. --··-----··--
031978246
2077-08-1-00.039
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110·2373
Vacant Unplatted Parcels
2942 .00
11.1300
Beg 655.78 Fl S Of Nw Cor Of E 112 Se 1/4 Ne 1/4 Th Sw 1104.45 Ftlh Se 356.97 Ft Th E 968. i
Ft Th N 508 Ft To Beg Sec 8-5-68
Total
5,565
1,614
Book Page
6942 0546
Units
11.1300AC
Building
0
0
2013 Mill Levy:
Date
04-09-1993
Land Value
5,565
Land
5,565
1,614
68.749
Price
0
Land Use
Type
QC
Vac Unplatted Area> 10.0 Acres but< 35.1
Acres
Nole Land Une data above corresponds to the Initial appraised value and does nol reflect subsequent appeal ralated sdjuslrMnts. if any
.,.. ____ ------· -· _.,._. _______ ,
• Not ell parcels have available pholcs I sketches
In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read. Please contact lhe Assessors Office for assistance_ Measuremenls taken from the exterlor of the build
The Arapahoe County AssesSOlS Office does not warranty lhe accuracy or any skelch, nor assumes any responsibility or Rabilfty to any user.
Atlhough some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos. at this time our system Is limited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per patcel number. Sorry fOf
Inconvenience.
New Search
•
•
•
• Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page I of I
•
•
---.-.---... ·--·-----------------
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full OWner List
Owner Address:
City/State/Zip:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Uae:
Legal Desc:
2014 Appraised VsJus
2014 Assessed Value
031978238
2on-os-1-00-03s
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Vacant Unplatted Parcels
2942.00
14.6100
Beg 988.77 Ft E Of Nw Cor Of S 112 Ne 1/4 Sec 8 Th E 391.2 Ft Th S 275 Ft Th Se 631.2 Fl Th ::
180.78 Ft Th Sw 1104.45 Ft Th Se 356.97 Ft Th W 53.09 Ft Th Nw 832.53 Ft Th Ne 492.09 Ft To
Beg Sec 8-5-68
Total
7,305
2,118
Building
0
0
2013 Miii Levy:
Land
7,305
2,118
68.749
Lend Un& Units Land Value Land Use
14.6100 AC 7,305 Vac Unplatted Area> 10.0 Acres but< 35 .1
Acres
Note · Land Une data above corresponds to the initial appraised value and does not reflect subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any
• Not all parcels have avaHable photos I sketches
In some cases a sltetdl may be dlf!lcull lo read. Please contact the Assessors Office ror assistance. Measurements taken from lt'.e exterior of the bulld
The Arapahoe County Assesson Office daes not warranty the accuracy af any ske!Ch, nar assumes any responslblllty or HabQily to any user.
Although some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos, at this Ume our system Is llmlled lo 1 sltelch and 1 photo per partel number. Sony for .
Inconvenience .
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
P;:igp 3.5 of 95
New Search
Arapahoe County • Parcel Search Page 1 of l
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full Owner List:
Owner Address:
City/State/Zip:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
Legal Desc:
2014 Appraiaed Value
2014 Assessed Value
031978173
2on-oa-1-00-031
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Englewood Ind Area
3537.00
1.9300
Beg 538.77 Ft E Of Nw Cor S 1 /2 Ne 1/4 Sec 8 Th E 450 Ft Th Sw 492.09 Ft Th Nw 400 Ft To Po
Total
300
87
Building
0
0
2013 Mill Levy:
Land
300
87
68.749
--·-----····--·-~,,.-~ ,,_,.._,_ ----.. ----"'-··----~-____ _....,., ..... --------·· ... ----~~~---------·
•
Land Une Units Land Value Land Use
1.0000 LT 300 Open Space •
Note Land Line data above corresponds to the Initial appraised value and does not reneet subsequent appeal related adjustments, if l!tly.
• Nol all parcels have available photos I sketches.
rn some cases a sketch may be dlftlcult to read. Please contact the Assewm Office for assistance. Measurements taken from the exterior of lhe buUd
The Arapahoe County Asses$Ol'S Office does not waminty the accuracy of 1111}' sketdl, nor assumes any responslbllily or llabffity lo any user.
Although some parcels may have mulllple buUdlngs and photos, at this lime our system Is Umlted to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number . Sorry for
inconvenience .
New Search
2015 Standard/Small Gran t Application
•
•
•
•
Arapahoe County -Parcel Search
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full Owner List:
Owner Address:
City/State/Zip:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
032594322
2on-os-1-00-04a
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Vacant Unplatted Parcels
2942.00
4.1000
Pagel of 1
Legal Oesc: Beg 141.58 Ft W Of Ne Cor W 112 Se 1/4 Ne 1/4 Sec 8-5-68 Th Alg Curve To Left 493 .87 Ft Th S
8.58 Ft Th Nw 631.2 Ft Th N 275 Ft To N Line Se 1/4 Ne 1/4 Th E 458.42 Ft To Beg
2014 Appraised Value
2014 Assessed Value
Land Line
Total
2,050
595
Units
4.1000AC
Building
0
0
2013 Mill Levy:
Land Value
528,900
Land
2,050
595
68 .749
Land Use
Vac Unplatted Area > 1.0 Acre but < 5.0
Acres
Nole Land Une data above comisponas to the Initial appraised value and does not renect sub:sequent appeal related adjustments. if any
• Not all paiuls have available photos I skeldles.
In some cases e sketch may be dlfficuH to read Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Measurements taken from the exterior of the bufid
The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responsibility or llabUity to any user.
Although some parcels may have multiple bulldings and photos, at this Orne our system ls llmlted to 1 sketch and 1 photo per pareel number . Sorry ror
Inconvenience.
New Search
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page I of l
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full Owner List:
Owner Address:
City/State/Zlp:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
Legal Desc:
2014 Appraised Velue
2014 Assessed Value
Sate
LsndUne
032620269
2on -oa..1..00-os2
2501 W Union Ave
Englewood
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Vacant Unplatted Parcels
2942.00
1.8400
Parcel Of Land In Ne 1/4 Sec B Desc As Beg At A Pt On N Line Of Co Rd No 1 Wh Is 77 .4 Ft Nw
From Se Cor Se 1/4 Ne 1/4 See 8 Th Ne 101.1 Ft Th Nw 185.06 Ft Th W 538.24 Ft Th S 130 Ft T
E 538.24 Ft Th Ne 101.1 Ft To Pob Sec B-5-68
Total
920
267
Book Page
8107 7057
A820 0553
Units
1.8400AC
Bull ding
0
0
2013 Mill Levy:
Date
05-02-2001
12-03-1998
Land Value
237,360
Land
920
267
68.749
Price
0
29,000
Land Use
Type
CTOR
SWAR
Vac Unplatted Area> 1.0 Acre but< 5.0
Acres
Note Land Une data above corresponds lo the lniUal sppraisf;d value and does not renect. subsequent appeal related adjustments, if any
• Nol all parcels have available photos I sketches .
In some cases a sketch may be dlffictJlt to read Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance. Measurements taken from the exterior or the build
Tiie Anlpahoe County Assessors Oflica does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch. nor assumes any responsibility or llabllity lo any user.
Although some parcels may have multlple buildings ar.d photos. at this lime our system Is limited to 1 slletch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sorry for
inconvenience
New Search
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Arapahoe County -Parcel Search
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full Owner List:
Owner Address:
City/State/Zip:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
Legal Oesc:
2014 Appraised Vslua
2014 Assessed Value
031978416
2on.os-1-03-00s
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110·2373
Englewood Ind Area
3537.00
6.2300
Lots 1-7 Blk 2 & Vac W Tufts Ave Adj & Lot 3 Blk 3 Cent Ind Park
Total
3,256,546
944,398
Building
0
0
2013 Miii Levy:
Land
3,256,546
944,398
68.749
Page 1 of 1
Land Line Units Land Value Land Use
6.2300 AC 3,256,546 Recreation
Note Lend Line data above corresponds to the Initial appraised value and does not reflect subsequent appeal ralated adjustments, If any.
• Nol all parcels have available photos I sketches
In some cases a sketch may be difficult lo reed . Please contact lhe Assessors Offica for assistance Measurements taken from Ille exterior ot lhe build
The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy or any sketch. nor euumes any responslb!Kly or liabAlly to any user .
Although some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos, al !his Ume oor system Is llmlted lo 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number . Sony for
Inconvenience .
New Search
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
ia·-·-..... .!•' •
. -.
___ __,._.....,;,..£ • ..........___-.;... ... __ ~--~ ........ -.-:.. --• ·•
~II
-• -·--·1· -I s·~ .... ;--:=_:
"' • I "' -···-···;' .. ~,.
-~ f T 1 "U Ir~~ a ' • m 1 1 c -·-· --..... lilli~~~~~~---~--~--~liiiiiilliiifi:!Eiiilli.DE
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 40 of 95
Cushing Park
033564561
033564545
•
•
•
•
-I
•
•
•
Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page 1 of I
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full Owner List
Owner Address:
City/State/Zip:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
Legal Desc:
2014 Apprslsed Value
2014 Assessed Value
--·-·· --· . -------. --------·-· -------------· ····-··--·---------·-··---~-
033564561
1971-34-3-00-079
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Non-Ind Englewood
3586.00
4.7500
That Part Of Sw 1/4 Sec 34-4-68 Desc As Beg 30 Ft S & 100 Ft E Of Nw Cor Of Sd Sw 114 Th S
125 Ft Th W100 Ft Th S 519.5 Ft MIL Th E 334 Ft Th N 676 Ft Th W231.35 Ft To Beg (Park) Ex
Road Sec 34-4-68
Total
3,207,105
930,060
Building
0
0
2013 Mill Levy:
Land
3,207,105
930,060
72.800
. -'-··-··-·· .. -·-·-·· ,. -------·----··-···-----------------··----
Land LJne Units Land Value Land Use
4.7500 AC O Recreation
Nate Land Line data above corresponds to the Initial appraised 11elue end does not re/feel subsequent appeal related adjustments, ff any.
• Nol all parcels have available photos I sketches .
!n some cases a skeld'I may be difficult to read Please contact lhe Assessors Office for assistance Measurements taken from the exteriOI' of the buHd
TI-ie Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responsibility or llal>Wt)i to any user.
Although some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos, st lhl! time our system ls limited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcef number. Sorry for .
lncoovenlence.
New Search
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page 1 of 1
---·A .......... --._._ .......................... _ ....... --...-O.·-..r .... ,,•,_, ..... --··--. • _..., _________ __.._. ____________ W_·------·-·-·
PIN:
AJN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full Owner Ust:
owner Address:
Clty/State/Zlp:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
Legal Oesc:
2014 Appraised Value
2014 A"6ssed Value
033564545
1971-33-4-00-083
840 W Dartmouth Ave
Englewood
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Englewood Ind North 1971
3538.00
4.9500
That Part Of Se 1/4 Sec 33-4-68 Desc As Beg 18 Ft W & 30 Ft S Of Ne Cor Of Sd Se 1/4 Th W
180.7 Ft To E Row Lineof At & Sf Row Th Sw Alg Sd Row Line 733.22 Ft Th E 420.33 Ft Th N
695.37 Ft To Beg Ex Road Sec 33-4-68
Total
2,177,424
631,453
.-.. ---~-·-----·-------·
Building
21,204
6,149
2013 Miii Levy:
Land
2,156,220
625,304
72.800
Lend LJne Units land Value land Use
4.9500 AC 2, 156,220 Recreation
Nole Land LJne data above corre!ponds to the lnH/ei appraised v&iue and aoes not reflect subsequent appeal related adjustments. if any
• Not all parcels have avaDable photos I sketches .
In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read. Please contact the Assessors Olf.ce for assistance. Measurements taken from the exterior of the build
The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not wam1nty the aceuracy of any sketch, nor ass\lmes any responsibility or ffablllty to any user.
Although same parcels may have multiple buildings and photos, at this Ume our system Is limHed to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel ntJmber. Sorry for
Inconvenience.
New Search
')(11 C:: C::~:>nrhrrl /C::m:.11 r.r:.nt ~nnlir:>tinn
. -
•
•
•
•
•
•
' .. 6 ,... 6 •
Cl4 • cu Cll •• gm
16:
' I
tr\®11• rs : j
: I
~ ~ ! ~ ; l i ~ !
: i I
I
ti BAKER AVE
;m
2015 Standard/Sma ll Grant App li cation
Page 43 of95
-'--1 z ..
z•! u ll ti
cm 111
...... __ ...
Ba ker Park
03 1002621
, J
... Of(
® ,. ,.
IU
' '
"''
·-·
• t
L!..t-·· .~'!!.!!'! ••.. w .lfEst.t Y
Arapahoe County -Parcel Search
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full Owner Ust
Owner Address:
City/State/Zip:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
031002621
1971-28-3-03-023
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Southlawn Gardens Annex
2070.00
0.8350
Legal Desc: lots 7-8 Blk 2 Southlawn Gdns Annex Dedicated To Public For Park
---·---·--·-----..... ----·-----------------
2014 Apprai$ed Velue
2014 Assessed Value
Total
600
174
Building
0
0
2013 Mill Levy:
'··--..._ .. ____ ·----··--~---'""·· """''' -·-·-·-· .... -· -~-.................... --·-----.------
Land
600
174
72800
Page 1 of 1
Land Une Units Land Value Land Use
2.0000 LT 600 Tract
Nol& Land Une data ebove corresponds lo the fnitlel appraised value end does not reflect subsequent eppeal related adjustments, if eny
• Nol all parcels have avallable photos I skelches
In &(lme cases a sketch may be difficult lo read . Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance . Meawrements laken from the exterior of the build
The Arapanoe County Assessors Office does not warranty Iha accuracy of any skelcit, nor assumes any responslbillty or llablfity to any user.
Although soma parcels may have multiple buildings and pholos, st this Ume cur system Is ffmlted to 1 sketch and 1 pholo per parcel number. Sorry for
ina>nvenlence.
New Search
")rl1 C C:+.., nA~,.,..I /Cm-:311 f'::r:Jnt Annlir-;Jtinn
•
•
•
•
•
•
@
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 45 of95
.: -. ... ,,
w OJFORO . ' . J .. ' ., ... ~-z• I or, or,
Jason Park
031964547
031964555
~.,,,.,..,. s>.m
~;-• I ••r I .. , ; /l
B ......
_QUAJl'fERSE~S _ .
-·~1111.~~u..&lU: ... ~~
Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page 1of1
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full Owner Ust
Owner Address:
City/State/Zip:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
Legal Desc:
2014 Appraised Value
2014 Assessed Value
031964547
20n--04-4-oo.032
1025 W Quincy Ave
Englewood
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Oxford Heights 2nd Fig
1692.00
4.noo
Beg 660 Fl W Of Se Cor Of Se 114 Th N 659.5 Ft Th W 330.5 Fl Th S 659.5 Ft Th E 330.5 Fl To
Beg Ex RtsJWay 4-5-68
Total
238,500
69,165
Building
0
0
2013 Mill Levy:
Land
238,500
69,165
72.800
LBlld Line Units Land Value Land Use
4. noo AC 238,500 Recreation
Nole Land Line data above ccrresponds to the initial appraised value and does not reflect subsequent appeal refaled adjustments, if any.
--· ---····-·-·-·-·-·--------------------------
• Not au pan:els have available pltolos I skelches
In some cases a sketch may be difficult to read . Please CC/ltact the Assessors Office for assistance. Measurements taken frcm tha exterior of the build
The Arapahoe County AssesllOrS Offtce does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch, nor assumes any respon&lblllly or liability lo any user.
Although some parcels may have multiple buUdings and photos , al !his Ume our system Is limited to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sorry for .
inconvenience.
New Search
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
•
•
•
.'
•
•
•
Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page 1of1
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full Owner List:
Owner Address:
City/State/Zip:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
Legal Oesc:
2014 Appraised Value
2014 Assessed Value
031964555
20n-04-4-00-033
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Oxford Heights 2nd Fig
1692.00
3.2800
Beg 1320.1 Ft W & 659.5 Ft S Of Ne Cor Of S 112 Of Se 1/4 Th E 330 Ft Th S 361.5 Ft Th W 82.f
Ft Th S 50 Ft Th W 82.5 Ft Th S 57 Ft Th W 82.5 Ft Th S 26 Ft Th W 82.5 Ft Th N 494.5 Ft To Be
Exempt
Total
164,000
47,560
Building
0
0
2013 Mill Levy:
Land
164,000
47,560
72.800
Land Une Units Land Value Land Use
3.2800 AC 164,000 Recreation
Note . Land Line data above corresponds to the initial appraised value and does not reffeci subsequent appeal r11/sted adjustments, if any
• Nol all parcels have available photos I sketclles .
In some cases a sketd'I may be difficult lo read. Please conlad the AssesSOIS Olllca for assistance. MeaStJrements taken from the exterior of the buHd
The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not wamnty the accuracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responsibility or Uabllity lo any user.
Although soma parcels may have mul!lpte buildings and photos, at lhls lime our ayslem Is Kmlted to 1 &ketch and 1 photo per parcel number. SolTy for .
Inconvenience.
New Search
201.5 Standard/Small Grant Aoolication
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 48 of 95
Miller Field
031943281
•
•
•
•
•
•
Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page 1 of l
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full Owner List
OWner Address:
Clty/StatelZlp:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
Legal Desc:
2014 Appraised Value
2014 Msessed Value
031943261
2on-0s-2-oo-004
3649 S Cherokee St
Englewood
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Jacksons Broadway Heights
1324.00 o.noo
-----· ---·----
Beg At A Pt 765 Fl S Of Cen Of Intersect Of W Hampden Ave & S Cherokee, Th W 309 Ft To Pt<
S Delaware, Th S 125 Ft Th E 309 Ft To Pt, Th N 125 Ft To Beg Ex Rds 3-5-68
Total
38,500
11,165
Bulldlng
0
0
2013 Miii Levy:
Land
38,500
11,165
72.800
-·--·---------------···-------------·-------------·--··----
Land Une Units Land Value Land Use O.noo AC 38,500 Recreation
Note Lend Llne data above corresponds to the In/Ila/ sppral!lY.! value end does not reflact sub.ssquenr appeal related adjus/ments, if any
-----------------------------·-·--· -------. ---.. -··-----·---·
• Not all parcels have evaHable photos I &ketches .
In some cases a sketch may be dfffkult to read Please cootact lhe Assessors Office for assistance. Measurements taken from the extetlor or the build ·
The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the aCQlracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responslblllty or llabfHty to any user.
Although some partels may have mulUple buildings and photos, al this lime our system Is limited lo 1 sketch and 1 photo per pan:ei number. Sony for .
Inconvenience.
New Search
2015 Standard/Small Grant Aoolication
"'·'•llioo ·--
.a.min , j
2015 Standard/Small Grant
Application Page 50 of 95
I
Ip f. ®
"'"
Emerson Park
031035112
AV£.
llli . ... ·-I -.-~
•
•
•
• ;\rapahoe County -Parcel Search Page 1 of l
•
•
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full Owner Ust:
Owner Address:
City/State/Zip:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
031035112
1971-35-2-00-002
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Vacant Unplatted Parcels
2942.00
1.1620
Legal Desc: Beg 16 Ft E Of Ne Cor Of Lot 1 Dobbins Resub Th E 166 Ft Th S 305 Ft Th W 166 Ft Th N 305 F
To Beg 35-4-68
2014 Appraised Value
2014 Ass8$S6d Velua
Total
149,640
43,396
Building
0
0
2013 Mill Levy:
·~---------·--·---··-·-·
LandUne Units
1.1600AC
Land Value
149,640
Land
149,640
43,396
72800
Land Use
Vac Unplatted Area > 1.0 Acre but < 5.0
Acres
Note Land Line data above ccrrasponds to the initial appraised value end does not reflect subsequent appeal related adjustments, ii any
• Not all parcels have avallable photos / skelches .
In some cases a sic.etch may be difficult to read. Please eonlsd lhe Assessors Office for assistance. Measurements taken f'rom the exterior of the build
The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the a<:euracy of any slcelch, nor assumes any responslbUlty or llabHlty lo any user.
AJ1hough some parcels may have multiple buildings and photos, at this time our syscem Is Umiled to 1 sketdl erai 1 photo per parcel number. Sorry for.
Inconvenience.
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 51of95
New Search
Fl.Om
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 52 of95
A\1£.
Romans Park
--;:;;-....-.-... --.. ·---·------
Romans Park
031045665
•
..
•
•
•
•
•
Arapahoe County -Parcel Search
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full owner List:
Owner Address:
City/State/Zip:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
031045665
1971-35-4-00-005
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Non-Ind Englewood
3586.00
4.4520
Page 1of1
Legal Desc: Beg 30 Ft S Of Ne Cor Sw 1/4Se1/4 Th S 150FtThW1293.04 Th N 150 Ft Th E 1292.87 Ft To
Beg35-4-68
2014 Appl'alssd Value
2014 Assessed Value
Total
3,168,793
918,950
Build Ing
162,568
47,145
2013 Mill Levy:
Land
3,006,225
871,805
83.418
Land Une Units Land Value Land Use
193950.0000 SF 3,006,225 Recreation
Note Lsnd Line data above corresponds to the Initial appraised value snd ~s nol re/feet subsequent appeal rela ted adjustments, If any.
·-· -----------------
• Not au parce!s heve available photos I skelches
In some cases a sketch may be dilf1cull to read . Please contact lhe Assessors Office for assistance. Measurements laken from th e exterlorofUle bulkl
The Arapahoe County Assessors Offiee does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch, nor assumes any responslbl!Uy or llab~ity lo any user .
Although some parcels may have mulllple bufldfngs and photos, et this time our system Is Nmlfed to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sony for .
Inconvenience.
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 53 of95
New Search
~er:::::::::::::::::::=:=:::::::=======::r::::::::::::!::::!!~=::s=::~'.!l'X:::::::::·~
f
2015 Standard/Smal l Gran t Application
Page 54 of95
Rotolo Park
031987326
"•U•IOllO Ave
~~~-·
____ , .. ,·.~-----... ~--····-··.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page I of 1
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Address:
Situs City:
Full Owner Ust
Owner Address:
Clty/State/Zlp:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
Legal Desc:
2014 Appraised Value
2014 Assessed Value
031987326
2on-og..1-00-os3
Englewood City Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Jensen Sub Neighborhood
250.00
2.4800
Beg 995 Ft S & 30 Ft W Of Ne Cor Of Ne 1/4 Sec 9 Th W 65.2 Ft Th Nw 140 Ft Th Sw 60 Ft Th N
32.09 Ft Th Nw 11.92 Ft Th N 80.92 Ft & 258.97 Ft Th Se 154.65 Ft Th E 121 Ft To Pt On W Line
S Huron St Th S 47 Ft & 144 Ft & 184 Ft To Pob 34-4-68
Total
300
87
Building
0
0
2013 Miii Levy:
Land
300
87
72.800
Land Line Units Land Value Land Use
1.0000 LT 300 Traci
Note Land Line dsta above corresponds to the Initial appraised value and does not reffed subsequent appeal related adjustments if sny
• Not an parcels have available photos I sketches .
In some c:ases a sketch may be difficult ID read Please contact the Assessors Office for assistance. Measurements taken from the elderlor or the build
The Arapahoe County Assessors Office does not warranty the accuracy of any sketch. nor assumes any respcnslbfllly or NabUity to any user.
AJ!~h same parcels may have multlple bulldlngs end photos, at this Urr.e our system Is Hmlled to 1 sketch and 1 photo per parcel number. Sorry ror .
Inconvenience.
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Pa~e 55 of 95
New Search
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 56 of 95
Bates-Logan Park
031012996
•
•
•
• Arapahoe County -Parcel Search Page 1 of 1
•
•
PIN:
AJN:
Situs Address:
Sit us City:
Full Owner List
Owner Address:
City/State/Zip:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code:
Acreage:
Land Use:
Legal Oesc:
2014 Appraised Vslue
2014 Assessed Veloo
031012996
1971 -34-1-00-038
Englewood Cily Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Non -Ind Englewood
3580.00
5.2800
Beg 840 Ft N & 30 Ft E Of Sw Cor Of Se 1/4 Ne 1/4 Th N 150 Ft Th E 296 Ft Th N 300 Ft Th E 2~
Ft Th S 76.6 Ft Th Alg Curve Se 285.1 Ft Th Sw 68.7 Ft Th Nw 122.1 Ft Th Alg Curve Sly & Sely
331 .3 Ft Th W106A Ft Th N 25 Ft Th W25 Ft Th S 25 Ft Th W 56.5 Ft Th N 150 Ft Th W296 Ft
To Beg 34-4-68
Total
2,851,960
827,068
Building
0
0
2013 Miii Levy:
Land
2,851,960
827,068
72 .800
---·----· -·-···----·-··· ---·-·-··-----. -----···------·-·--------------·------------~··--
Land Line Units Land Value Land Use
5.2800 AC O Recreation
No te. Land Une data above corresponds to the lnlUal appraised value and does not reflect subsequent eppeat related adjustments, if any.
--·-~--·-·-·--·---,-----·-·-·· -~--------~ .. ·-·---·-----------
• Nol an parcels have avanable photos I sketches
In soma cases a sketch may be difficult to read Please contact Ille Assessora Office for assistance. Measurements taken rrom the exterior of the build
The Arapahoe Col.lflty Assessora Office does not warranty the aCQlracy of any sketch, nor assume$ any respanslbl9ty or liability lo any user.
Although some pan:els may have mUltlple buildings and photos, al thls time our system Is limited lo 1 sketch and 1 photo per pareel number. Sorry ror
Inconvenience.
New Search
2015 Standard/Small Gran t Application
Part G Attachm ents -4. Evid ence of Co mmunity Sup p o ~~
~~
c T y 0 F ENGLEWOOD
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
January 8, 2015
Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Program
6934 S. Lima St. Unit A
Centennial, Colorado 80112
Advisory Board Members:
•
I am writing this letter of support on behalf of the Englewood Parks and Recreation Commission in
support of the Englewood Parks and Recreation Department's grant application for Gateway •
Enhancements in Englewood parks .
Gateway enhancements in the parks will improve the overall perception of Englewood as well as
improve the connectivity with park users by clearly identifying park names and locations.
Enhancements to the parks gate ways will reflect the ongoing improvements taking place in the Ci ty
of Englewood . These upgrades to the parks will reiterate to the public that the City and the
Department of Parks and Recreation values and takes pride their parks and their community.
Thank you for your consideration of the Gateway Enhancements for Englewood Parks.
uglas Garrett
Ch ai r
En gle wood Parks and Recreation Commission
1155 W. Oxford Avenue En glewood, Colorado 80110 Phon e 303-762-2680 Fax 303-762-2688
2015 Standard/Small Gra nt Ap pli cation wwwoenglewoodc:o1,15
Page 58 of95
•
•
•
•
Englewood Schools
A Relentless Foc us On Learn ing
Dece m ber 4, 201 4
Arapahoe C o unty Open S pace Grant Program
6934 S . Lima St. Unit A
Centennial, Colorado 80 I 12
Dear Board Members,
BRIAN K. EWERT
Superintendent of Schools
On behalf of Englewood Schools, [would like to offer my support for an Arapahoe County Ope n Space
Grant that would provide Gateway Enhancements in Englewood parks .
New gateway signs in Englewood parks will enhance the overall image and perception of Englewood . The
enhancements to the signs will reflect the transformations and improvements that are taking place within
the City of Englewood. The new park signs will also help identify the parks to visitor and resident alike.
New park gateway enhancements will convey to the public the pride and dedication that the City has
towards its parks and the community.
We support the City's grant application for the Gateway Enhancements in Englewood parks.
Sincerely,
E 'l
' .
Brian Ewe
Superinte ent
410 I S. B nnock St.
Englewoo , CO 80 l l 0
Roscoe Da idson Administration Building • 4101 S. Ba nnock St • Englewood, CO 80110 • Phone : 303..!761..!705 0
2 015 Standar /Small Grant Application
Page 59of95
December 16, 2014
Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Program
6934 S. Lima St. Unit A
Centennial, Colorado 80112
Dear Board Members,
Advisory Board Members:
I am writing this letter of su pport for the Englewood Department of Park and Recreation's
applicati on for grant fund s for the Gateway Enhancements.
As a citizen of Englewood and a neighbor of Belleview Park, I believe that the Gateway
Enhancements in Englewood parks will enhance the overall image and perception of the City
Englewood.
The upgrades to the signs \Viii reflect the transformations and improvements that are taking place
within the City of Englewood. The new park signs will also help identify the parks to visitors and
residents alike. New park gateway enhancements will convey to the public the pride and dedication
that the City has towards its parks and the community.
Thank you for your consideration for this application.
Sincerely,
Rick Gillit
4985 S. Lipan Drive
Englewood, CO 80110
(303) 246-4780
20 15 St andard/Small Gra nt Applicat i on
Page 60 of95
•
•
•
•
•
=
•
•
•
December 4, 2014
Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Program
6934 S. Lima St Unit A
Centennial, Colorado 80112
Dear Board Members,
Englewood Unleashed is a non-profit orgam2abon wh1Ch is dcdleated to public education for off-
leash dog recreation, site selection, park maintenance and fundraising for the City of Englewood's
off leash community. Created in 2004 Englewood Unleashed has been vital in the development of
Englewood's first dedicated dog park, Canine Corral ,located in Belleview Parle, as well as
maintained off-leash privileges at four other Englewood Parks .
Englewood Unleashed continues to work with, aiCI and ass~ the City of Englewood's City Council,
Parks and Recreation Commission and Parks and Recn:ation Department by raising funds and
providing volunteer support to tinprove and better maintain the off-leash parks in Englewood, in
which dogs can exercise without leash restraint lb a clean, healthy and safe environment
Our organization bas supported the City with funds for dog park signage in the past and fully
supports the City of Englewood's application for Arapahoe County grant funds for the Gateway
Enhancements. These enhancements will expand access and connectivity to the parks as well as
improve the overaU image of Englewood Parks and Recreation and the City of Englewood for all
citizens and visitors including those of us with pets.
Sincerely,
President, Englewood Unleashed
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 61of95
December4, 2014
Pirate Youth Sports
Laura Sakry, President
4550 S. Galapago St.
Englewood, CO 80110
Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Program
6934 S. Lima St. Unit A
Centennial, Colorado 80112
Dear Board Members,
This letter is written on behalf of Pirate Youth Sports. I am writing this letter in support of the
grant application for the Gateway Enhancements for Englewood Parks.
Pirate Youth Sports is a non-profit, al I volunteer organization that serves the youth of Englewood
by providing recreational and competitive sports for boys and girls, first through eighth grade.
Pirate Youth Sports utilizes the parks within Englewood for our various sports and feels that new
gateway entrance signs would enhance the City of Englewood's image. The new signs would be
one of the first things visitors from outside Englewood would see when they arrive at the park for
practices or games. The signs would not only help indicate to residents and visitors that they are at
the correct park, but would also make an impression about the park that it is maintained and valued
by the citizens of Englewood.
We support the City of Englewood 's application for grant funds for the Gateway Enhancements for
parks within the City.
;:;~ J1!/fieh1 ~ u~ Sakry , Pres i ~-·~vo
Pirate You th Sports
2015 Standard/Small Grant Applicat ion
Page 62 of95
•
•
•
l
.rt G Attachments -5. Documentation of opposition and responses
•
• 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 63 of95
No opposition or responses to include
Part G Attachments -6. Evidence of commitment from funding partners
No funding partner commitment to include
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 64 of95
•
•
•
-ratLVMLLO\..lllllt::llL:>-1.rltULU:>
•
• Current Park Signage at Belleview Park
•
Current Park Signage at Belleview Park
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
n ---"'r -'or
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Pa1;1e 66 of95
Current Park Sign age at Baker Park
Current Park Signage at Emerson Park
•
•
•
•
• Current Park Signage at Bates-Logan Park
•
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 67 of95
Current Park Signage at Romans Park
Current Park Signage at Romans Park
Current Park Signage at Cushing Park
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 68 of95
•
•
•
•
• Current Park Signage at Cushing Park
•
Current Park Signage at Miller Field
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
n----l!::n -Ln~
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 70 of95
Current Park Signage at Jason Park
Current Park Signage at Jason Park
•
•
•
•
• Current Park Signage at Rotolo Park
•
Current Park Signage at Centennial Park
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Current Park Signage at Centennial Park
Current Park Signage at Centennial Park
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 72 of95
•
•
•
•
~agn ts non-1ll um1rmeo. alurrnm:m cnns:rur.t1aa u:e a r.1!-i·
r.oocrr.tc hose
pai nt sys tem shall be Matthew$ m;rylic rmly1,reti1ane !FHlf1t1
ms istant flaint
color 1: b:glewoJtl stan:wrrl I eneral tireen (Pl"1 S ,i4~5) ver fy
color 2: Matthews ~nrus l 1H~! Alu~r tnu m" metaH1r.:
co lor :1 · Mattlmws "W<im' Wl 1ite '
arct1 1s two piucns. roll-formm1 alu11Hmm skin ovw :nte·r 11
<1lum1m1i11 strur:turn, as rnqmre it wHld two p1ncB~ to(lett'a!',
welds sh;il l nol sh:;w, pil in! fi11i sh tw n colors as s11riwn
t
\ 1· ~ ~ \ -l:. l
..-', • ._ -.-!
)
I
i......
,.
\ I ..
I ,
c,<'\.
,.-I;' .
I "' f_
r '. i · it ( I
L-~1' '' ,,,.,,,.,.....,..."
Proposed ACOS approved signage design
.5 Standard/Small Grant Application
;e 73 of 95
struts su pp orting mch shall Im 2 1/2"s q "I" boam prot ilo; paint
finish ~nlor Z; struts shall slip -fi t into arch & into sign cabinet
sign cabinet sh•!I be brake-fo rmed with retucns en three sides,
as shown; pnint finisl1color1; faste n to ir1temal alum!mnn
structure with co unter suik flat head. vandal ·resistant faste ners.
equolly spaced. as required
sign fa ~n sh all ho brnke-fo rmed with stopped detail on tw o
edges left & right; returns on three sides. as shown; paint frn is•i
eulw 3; fasten to int mnal alu1 1inum strur:ture with cou~tm sunk
flat head, vandal-resistant fa steners, eq ually sp:Jced . as required
lnllrn ' s!1a ll be 1/4" thick alum inwn plate; paint finish col or 1,
•
fas!en tc sig:i face with b!md, vandal·resistant. mec hanical
tasterers. as required; typeface: Optima Regul ar
logo medallio n sl mll ho roll -for med alum inum s\i n nver internal
aluminum structure, as requirnd, to form cylin de r tha t inte rsf!c1s
s1 yn cab inet; paint fi ni sh color 2; logo plato shall he 1/2" th ick
aluminum plate; paint finish co lor 3; logo components shall be
1/4" thick alum inum plate; paint finish co lor 1; ontire logo
medallion asse mbly slrnll be fastened with blind.
vandal-resistant. nmctmnica l fasteners, as required
escutc henn whe re srgn moats base s!iall b• brnke-formej with
re turns on three sid es, as shown; paint fimsh color 1: fasten to
internal alum 'nurn stru ctwo with co•mter suak fl at head.
vandal-rosistant fasten ers. r.qua ll y spaced. as required
base sha ll he cast r.oncrete wi th chamfered edge & "visual"
finish; "E NGLEWOOD" lottors sha ll bo 1/4 " recessed into cast
conc ret e; all surfaces of concrete, inr.l11ding recessed lottms .
shal l be visual quality wit h clea n edges & r.orners; provide [i"w
concrete m~w strip on tou r sides of base flush wit h fin is hed
grndo
provid e do tailcd shop drawing for rnvinw prior to fabriCfl ti on
landscaping, struc tural eng ineer ing & footinu is hy others
•
TACITO DE S IGN lflC
1143WAlHSll(Ef1
:rnmns
!HN\'F.H, Clll.UlltiO(I fl.!l2i11
:.IDJ850!1191
h eh 4't~c11od1n1G~ r.r<m
www.u,11ot1n1gn tum
!lRAf'lllC OC!i lGN
WAVFINnlNG
W(B SITE DCSlfitl
SI GNAOF SVSlFMS
PACK AfHNG
City of Eoolewood
Oenartmen t of Parks
lll t10cro1mon
Park
Identification
Sign
t/2"=1'-0"
Preliminary De sign 11.05.12
Oesign Development 11 .15.12
Final Design t2.20.11
Add Arnp ahoc info 11.24.14
llevisorl 11.01.14
-----------
Slleet number
1.0 Alt5a
Proposed Landscape Design
10 '
C ITY OF ENGLEWOOD
L ARGE PARK SIGN -IRRIGATED
Proposed Landscap e De sign
PLAN VIEW
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
LARGE PARK S IGN -NON-IRRI GATED
2015 Standard/Small Grant Applicati o n
Page 74 of9 5
• Skyrocket Juniper
Featfler Reeel Grass
Dian thus
c Mexican Feather
~ Grass
ti· Blue Fescue
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
16'
• Lavender
• Dayfily
Proposed Landscape Design
8'
0 Feather Reed Grass
Ill Oianthus
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
SMALL PARK SIGN -IRRIGATED
Proposed Landscape Design
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
SMALL PARK SIGN -NON-IRRIGATED
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 75 of95
Proposed Landscape Design
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
SIGN-NO PLANT MATERIAL
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 76 of95
•
•
•
•
• • •
City of Englewood, Colorado
2015 Arapahoe County
Open Space, Parks, and Trails
Grant Application
0
Englewood Parks
Signage Modernization
Belleview Park
Site Plan Map
LEGEND
o Sign Locations
a Park Boundary Lines
January 2 015
{'
9
200 400
Feet
600
• •
City of Englewood, Colorado
2015 Arapahoe County • Open Space, Parks, and Trails
0
Grant Application
f nglewood Parks
Signage Modernization
Miller Field,
and Baker, f merson,
Bates-Logan, Romans,
Jason, and Cushing Parks
Site Plan Map
LEGEND
0 Sign Locations a Park Boundary Lines
Ja nuary 2015
{'
9
200 400
feet
•
600
• • •
City of Englewood, Colorado
2015 Arapahoe County
Open Space, Parks, and Trails
Grant Application
(}
f nglewood Parks
Signage Modernization
Centennial Park
Site Plan Map
LEGEND
O Sign Locations
a Park Boundary Lines
January 2015
''
9
200 400
Fef't
600
Part G Attachments -9. GIS Shapefile
Included/Submitted in Part G. Attachment 3-
2015 Standard/Small Grant
Application Page 80 of 95
Evidence of Property Ownership
Page 26
Also included on CD
•
•
•
#
·Part G Attachments -10. Other-Council Communication 1999
• COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
•
•
DATE: October 18, 1999 AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Entry Port
Monumentation, District
11 C Ii Signage, and Parks Signage
INITIATED BY: Department of STAFF SOURCE: Art Scibel!i, Business
Neighborhood and Business Development Development Coordinator
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
Quality of life. South Broadway Action Plan action item. No previous Council action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends that Council award the design contract to Tacito Design .
BACKGROUND. ANALYSIS, AND Al TERNATIVES IDENTIFIED:
Staff inteiViewed two design consultants for the Entry Port Monumentation, district
Signage and Parks Signage contract. Tacito Design has extensive experience
designing and constructing public facility signs. Tacito's graphics and designs were
more innovative and exciting than those of the competing firm.
This consulting contract is about enhancing Englewood's community image and identity
within the metro area ~ letting people know when they have arrived in Englewood. It
ties together the commercial corridors, CityCenter, and parks; one community, one
identity. It takes into account the design elements that are already well underway, Le.
CityCenter logo, federal green color (similar to Englewood's new forest green color),
banners on South Broadway, ornamental ironwork. colored concrete banding. and
median design. It is a design effort that is intended to coordinate common community
design elements.
The entry port design proposal includes Identity monuments at four key locations; North
and South Broadway and East and West Hampden entry ports. Funding has been
requested in the FY 2001 and FY 2002 capital budgets to construct these entry ports.
District signage will be designed for the four distinct districts along South Broadway.
Signage for parks and recreational facilities will be designed concurrently to provide for
a unified community design theme throughout Englewood .
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 81of95
Part G Attachments -10. Other-Request for Proposal-City Entryway Monumentation
-----Please refer to Advisory Committee section for evidence of public process/input
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
CITY ENTRYWAY MONUl\'IENTATION
Purpose
The City of Englewood is interested in strengthening community image and heightening aware-
ness of Englewood. The selected consultant will assist the City of Englewood in the preparation
of design development level Entry Monumentation Concepts (plan, elevation, and details), as
well as with public meetings. The Entry Monumentation concepts will be developed in coordi-
nation with City staff and citizens and will address topics including potential location, vehicular
and pedestrian circulation, the desired image for Englewood, cost, materials, and methods of
construction.
Approach
The selected consultant will attend a series of Work Sessions that include City staff, Design Ad-
visory Committee, and residents, as appropriate. The selected consultant will work with the City
to generate alternatives for each of four potential locations for evaluation. The alternatives
should include visual presentations. The consulrant should seek agreement from the City as to
which alternative best reflects the tone, style, and image of the corridor and the City. The
monuments will be located at the Englewood/Denver border, the Englewood/Littleton border on
Broadway, the Sheridan/Englewood border, and the Denver/Englewood border on Hampden
A venue. It is important that each entry reflect a unique nature reflective of the location and
neighborhood, and still project a consistency of style through common design elements and/or
materials. All entry ports should be representative of an Englewood image. The Englewood im-
age wil1 be developed through discussion with the public, staff, and through review of back-
ground materials provided by the City.
The consultant should assist the City in seeking community support by leading meetings as ap-
propriate, and by sharing ideas and listening carefully to community issues. The consultant
should be an experienced environmental graphic designer with five or more demonstrable years
of experience with civic projects of this scale. Designer must be able to design, document, and
manage a large scale project.
Advisory Committee
The selected consultant will work with the Design Advisory Committee for the project consisting
of policy-makers, representative South Broadway and Hampden Avenue merchants, residents,
and City staff. This Design Advisory Committee would act as a sounding board and advocacy
group to guide the work and to communicate with others in their constituencies .
2015 Standard/Small Gra nt Application
Page 82 of95
•
•
•
••
•
•
Part G Attachments -10. Other-Suggested Scope of Work-City of Englewood Signage Projects 1999-
Please refer to section Cl on next page for Parks and Recreation Signage
Suggested Scope of Work
A Entry Port Design: 4 Key Locations (submit separate proposed budget for this activity)
1. Background Review
• Review existing information, photos , base maps , background materials pre-
pared and gathered by the City;
• Review City of Englewood history to assist in creating a design image;
Review infonnation for potential locations for monumentation along the South
Broadway and Hampden corridors, characteristics, limitations, and opportuni-
ties at the following four specific locations:
a) Automotive dealerships. Designer should examine city maps to determine
exact city boundary location.
b) The Hampden Avenue Sheridan/Englewood border (across from City-
Cenrer Englewood).
c) The northern South Broadway border of Denver and Englewood at Yale
Avenue.
d) Hampden Avenue Cherry Hills Village/Englewood border .
2. Public Input
• The designer shall conduct a total of six meetings with the entry port/banner
design team. This committee shall have community and corridor representa-
tion.
• Designer shall discuss issues on potential monumentation locations , principles
and objectives for monumentation design, and City image with committee
members.
• Designer shall create a report documenting principles and objectives for the
monumentation. This report should take the form of a design intent statement ,
whi ch shalt represent an objective li st of criteria to which all parties can agree
before design begins. The design intent statement shou ld be a vehicle that al-
lows the design team to build consensus amongst interested parties.
3. Analysis
• Prepare draft concept for monumentation location s identified in Item I above .
a) Southern south Broadway Englewood/Littleton Border;
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 83 of95
District Signage Design (submit separate proposed budget for this activity):
1. Conduct field review of four districts on South Broadway:
a) North Gateway
b) Downtown
c) Cherryln
d) South Gate way
2. Prepare two design concepts for signs in each of the four districts.
3. Present ideas for siting of the signs in each district, i.e., at beginning and end of
each district, etc.
C . Parks and Recreation Department Signage {submit separate proposed budget for this ac-
tivity):
1. Present two design alternatives for common use in 12 of the City's parks. Said de-
sign alternatives shall be by the Parks and Recreation Board and subject to re-
finement after review . Parks are as follows:
a) Baker
b) Bates/Logan
c) Belleview
d) Centennjal
e) Cushing
t) Duncan
g) Emerson
h) Hosana Athletic Complex
i) Jason
j) Miller Field
k) Romans
1) Rotolo
f\depl\nbd\group\bu s\:ltt\s . broadway\rlps'.c::iuy port rr.cnument.ation rip-2 .dcx:
2015 Standard/Small Grant App lication
Page 84 of95
..
•
•
•
.:
.Part G Attachments -10. Other-Tacito Design-Design Intent Statement TACITO DESIGN INC
565S SOUTH YOSE MITE SHE:;
SU 1TE 201
•
•
December 16, 1999
Design Intent Statement/ 2nd Draft
GR£rnwooo l:ILLAGE CClQRAOO 90!11
mas~ 931s FA X
3U3 ~5~ 9191 VOICE
The purpose of this Design Intent Statement is to establish goals and objectives for the City of Eng lewood
Srgnage projects in a manner which will help to build consensus among interested parties. The Design
Intent Statement will be used throughout the design process to verify that the design concepts and final
so!ution successfully meet the needs of the project
These sta t ements are not presented in any particu lar order.
1. South Broadway shall be the unifying essence of this project's signage efforts .
2. Complement existing and/or planned Englewood Streetscape Program.
3. Strengthen community image, unifying all areas under one civic ident ity.
4. Entry Port Monuments shall set the design theme. District signage an d parks & recreation signage
shall follow suit with a •tamily resemb lance· tc the Entry Port Monuments.
5. Entry Port Monuments shall sha il emphasize city gateways with large, vehicular-scale element(s) that
respect the history of the City and acknow l edge pec!estrians. These four monuments will be similar
to one another, yet allow for the differences in each location.
e. District Signage shall identify unique areas within the City of Englewood, call ing attention to each
area's amenities, past and/or present These signs will be similar to one another, yet all ow for the
differences in each district
7. Parks and Recrea:ion Signage sha ll identify and celebrate the presence of City parks and open
space, increasing the awareness cf vehicular and pedestrian audiences .
. • '!
2015 Standard/Small Grqnt Application
Page 85of95
Part G Attachments -10. Other-Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-May 9, 2002
Please refer to section V for Park Signage CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
PARKS AND RECREATION C01\1MISSION
May 9, 2002
Englewood Recreation Center, Adult Activity Room
1155 W. Oxford A venue
5:30pm
AGENDA
I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Minutes for April 11, 2002
III. Scheduled Visitors (presentation limited to 10 minutes)
IV. Unscheduled Visitors (presentation limited to 5 minutes)
V. Park Signage -Lee and Bob Gnaegy, Tacito Design
VI. Recreation Project Bond Update -Black
VII. Golf Medal Award-Black
VIII. Golf Course City Administration Fee -Black
IX. Water Issues -Black
X. Off-Leash Park Pilot Program Update -Lee
XI. Centennial Park Update -Black
XU. Cultural Arts Commission Update-Moore
XIII. City Center Update -Garrett
XIV. Director's Choice
Capital Projects
XV. Commission Member's Choice
XVI. Adjournment
Attachments
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f .
Minutes of April 11, 2002
2002 Englewood Holiday Parade Memorandum
MOA Design and Build Information
Apri l 28, 2002 Denver Post Article regarding Golf Courses
National Senior Health & Fitness Day Flyer
Memorandum from Ben Greene regarding Fires on City Property
Please notify Debby Severa at 303-762-2684 by Tuesday, May 7, 2002
if you are unable to attend.
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
D::>o.o R" nf Qc;
·•
•
•
•
•
•
•
v. PARK SIGNAGE-LEE Ml> BOB GNAEGY, TACITO DESIGN
The meeting was turned over to Dave Lee, Open Space Manager, who introduced Bob
Gnaegy of Tacito Design. Gnaegy began discussion on park signage for the City by showing
Commission members the four designs under consideration. Gnaegy explained that he had
been working with Dave Lee, Austin Gomes, and others from Community Development to
create a family of signs for Englewood parks. Gnaegy said that the purpose of the signage is
to unify and create attention for the park system. Gnaegy explained that the signs would be
double-faced and placed in conspicuous locations in each park. Gnaegy added that there was
a range of detail options that could change according to budget. Commission members
discussed size, maintenance concerns, etc. Chairperson Gomes asked Gnaegy what the cost
would be for the signs. Gnaegy responded that the estimate was $9,000 -$14,000 apiece if
purchased six at a time, including installation. Chairperson Gomes asked Lee to tally
Commission members' votes for one of the four designs. Design #2 was chosen. Gnaegy
told Commission members that a revised design would be presented to Commission again in
the future.
VI. RECREATION BOND PROJECT UPDATE-BLACK
Gary Hultberg, Recreation Manager, announced that the Rec Center and Malley Center parts
of the Bond Project were on schedule and on budget. Hultberg said that requests for
qualifications had just gone out for the aquatics center, and that construction should begin by
February or March of next year. Hultberg added that the aquatics project was expected to be
completed by Spring of2004 .
VII . GOLD MEDAL AW ARD -BLACK
Black returned discussion to the Gold Medal Award briefly discussed at the beginning of the
meeting. Black said that just to be selected as a finalist for the award was very important,
and says a lot about Englewood leadership and staff. Black added that this was the
Department's second time as a finalist, the last time being in 1970. Chairperson Gomes
asked when the award would be presented. Black replied that the announcement would be
made at the National Parks and Recreation Association convention in October.
VIII. GOLF COURSE CITY ADMINISTRATION FEE -BLACK
Black announced that the Director of Finance Administration had discussed with him asking
the Golf Course to pay an administrative fee to the City of$130,000 per year. The Director
of Finance Administration suggested raising fees $2 per round to cover the fee. Black and
Commission members discussed the importance of keeping the fees low, citing a Denver Post
article included in members' packets regarding the current glut of golf courses. Commission
member Waldman asked what the administrative fee was for . Black replied tha t it is to cover
services that other departments (Human Resources, City Attorney, etc.) do for the Golf
Course . Discussion ensued. Co uncil Member Garrett added that City Council is looking at
all enhancements and cutbacks to balance the City 's revenue shortfall . Jerrell Black
mentioned the possibility of getting the funds from the Golf Course's reserve fund of
$600,000 , bu t added that there were numerous other Golf Course projects that ha ve been
projected for those funds . The Commission was not in support of raising golf fees or using
funds from the Golf Fund balance. Council Member Garre rt said he would convey the
Board's concerns to City Counc il.
2015 Standard/Sma ll Grant Application
Page 87 of95
Part G Attachments -10. Other-Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-October 11, 2012
Please refer to section V for Park Si gnage
City of Englewood
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Minutes of October 11, 2012
I. Call to Order
The regular monthly meeting of the Englewood Parks and Recreation Commission was
called to order at 5:30 p .m. by Chairperson Gomes at the Malley Recreation Center, 3380
S . Lincoln Street.
Present:
Absent:
Also Present:
II. Approval of Minutes
Austin Gomes, Chairperson
Mitch Waldman, Vice Chairperson
Mark Husbands, Commission Member
Duane Tucker, Englewood Schools Liaison
Donna Schnitzer, Cultural Arts Commission Liaison
Jerrell Black, Ex-Officio
Douglas Garrett, Commission Member
Karen Miller, Commission Member
Bob Mccaslin, City Council Liaison
Dave Lee, Manager of Open Space
Joe Sack, Recreation Manager
Bob Spada, Golf Manager
Joyce Musgrove , Recreation Program and Facility
Supervisor
Chairperson Gomes asked if there were any changes or corrections to the
minutes of September 13, 2012. Director Black noted that the location of the
meeting was incorrect and should read the Englewood Recreation Center.
The minutes were approved as amended.
Ill. Scheduled Public Comment
There were no scheduled guests.
IV. Unscheduled Public Comment
There were no unsched ul ed guests .
V. Park Signage
Dave Lee, Manager of Open Space , told the Board that in 2002 , new park signage
information was brought to the Board for its review and approval. Lee distributed
to the board members four examples of park signage that was shown to the Board
in 2002. Lee noted that the Board chose option #2 . Lee went on to explain that he
wanted to bring forth discuss ion on the signage again because of wanting new
signage at Dunca n Park when it is developed .
Englewood Schools Liaison Duane Tucker asked if there were any other reasons
besides aesthetics that Design #2 was chosen . Lee replied no, explaining that the
current signage is very outdated, dating back to the 1970's. Lee stated that in
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 88 of95
•
•
•
•
•
•
VI.
VII .
2002, the City had decided to move forward with new signage for the four entry
points into Englewood but then the economy changed and it was put on the back
burner. Black explained that Community Development had contracted with Tacitio
Design to look at signage for the entry points into Englewood so the Department
decided to partner with Community Development and have Tacito Design come up
with some designs for park signage. Black reported that the Department spent
approximately $15,000 for the conceptual designs. Discussion followed.
Gomes asked where the new signage would be placed. Lee stated that the new
signs would go where the existing park signs are with additional smaller scale
signs going in at the secondary entries . Board members were told that the price
listed on the information they received is 2002 dollars . Lee told the Board that the
purchase of the new signage would be spread out, and not done all at once. Black
explained to the Board that they wanted to have the Board look at the signage now
so when they start developing Duncan Park, things will be in place. Discussion
followed . The question was asked in regard to damage and vandalism to the signs .
Black stated that the Department wants to make sure that part replacement is key
and anything that is damaged or vandalized can be fixed or replaced.
Discussion followed in regard to board members choice for signage. Design #2
was the Board's preference.
A motion was made by Vice Chairperson Waldman and seconded by
Commission Member Husband recommending that design option 2
be pursued for park signage for the City of Englewood parks .
Ayes: Gomes, Waldman, Husband, Schnitzer, Tucker
Nayes: None
Motion passed.
2013 Budget
Discussion turned to an update on the 2013 budget . Black stated that the 2013
budget will be going to second reading at Monday night's City Council meeting.
Board members were told that Counci l had requested a two percent reduction in
2012 budgets with another two percent reduction going into 2013 . Black explained
that for Parks and Recreation, the reduction meant the elimination of a full-time
Program Administrator posit ion. Black reported that C ity Council is now requesting
another one percent reduction going into 2013. Board members were told that the
additional one percent reduction will mean the eli mination of the Youth Program
Administrator in addition to all youth programs , impacting approximatel y 7,000
participants . Black reported that at Monday night's City Council work session,
Council decid ed to accept the budget as is without the additional one percent
reduction and look at it again in February after holiday sales. Black noted that
Council will vote Monday night as part of the second reading. Black told the Board
that he needs to iterate that the budget cuts are way beyond a little here and a little
there, th at it is now into personnel and program cuts.
Recreation Update
Recreation Manager Joe Sack gave an update on Department events . In regard to
the Freedom Service Dog's Festival of the Bastardino that was held on Saturday ,
Septembe r 81h in Belleview Park and Pirates Cove, Sack reported that they have
recently met with staff from Freedom Service Dogs for a debriefing. Sack passed
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 89of95
Part G Attachments -10. Other-Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes-November 15, 2012
Please refer to section VI for Park Signage
City of Englewood
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Minutes of November 15, 2012
I. Call to Order
The regular monthly meeting of the Englewood Parks and Recreation Commission was
called to order at 5:30 p.m . by Chairperson Gomes at the Broken Tee Englewood Golf
Course Maintenance Facility at 4000 S. Clay Street.
II.
Present: Austin Gomes, Chairperson
Mitch Waldman, Vice Chairperson
Douglas Garrett, Commission Member
Karen Miller, Commission Member
Bob Mccaslin , City Council Liaison
Duane Tucker, Englewood Schools Liaison
Jerrell Black, Ex-Officio
Absent: Mark Husbands, Commission Member
Schnitzer, Cultural Arts Commission Liaison
Also Present: Dave Lee, Manager of Open Space
Joe Sack, Recreation Manager
Bob Spada, Golf Manager
Wayne Niles, Golf Course Superintendent
Approval of Minutes
Chairperson Gomes asked if there were any changes or corrections to the
minutes of October 11, 2012. There were none. The minutes were approved
as presented.
Ill. Scheduled Public Comment
There were no scheduled guests.
IV. Unscheduled Public Comment
There were no unscheduled guests.
V. Arapahoe County Open Space Grants
Recreation Manager Joe Sack told the Board that the Department has received the
unfortunate news from GOCO that it was not successful with its gran t application
for the development of Duncan Park. Sack reported that it was very competitive
with forty seven grant applications requesting approximately $11.7 million and only
nine grants awarded in the amount of $2.2 million. Sack stated that the
Department will be contactin g GOCO to get feedback o n its application and will
also be moving forward with its grant application with Arapahoe County Open
Space . Discussion followed.
A motion was made by Commission Member Douglas Garrett and
seconded by Commission Member Karen Miller in support of the
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 90 of95
•
•
•
•
•
•
_, .
Department of Parks and Recreation grant application submittal with
Arapahoe County Open Space for the development of Duncan Park.
Ayes:
Nayes:
Gomes, Waldman, Garrett, Miller, Mccaslin, Tucker
None
The motion passed.
VI . Parks Signage
VII .
VIII.
In regard to last month's discussion on park signage, Open Space Manager Dave
Lee reported that he now has five renditions of the sign (Option 2) that the Board
had selected. Pictures of the five renditions were distributed to board members for
their favorite. Lee explained that the signs are aluminum powder coated with
epoxy paint and the letters are epoxied or glued on. Lee also noted that the logos
are solid all the way through and the signs are all easily maintained. Vice
Chairperson asked if the signs are one or two sided. Lee answered both .
Englewood Schools Liaison Duane Tucker asked in regard to prices for the five
renditions . Lee replied that they are all the same price . Tucker asked if any of
them fit in with existing signage. Lee replied that Option 1 fits in with signage at
the Civic Center. Following discussion, board members agreed that their
preference is Option 1 b with the flattened roof design from option 1 a.
Golf Course Restaurant
Bob Spada , Golf Manager, informed the Board that the restaurant contract with Jim
Dadiotis, The Grill at Broken Tee, LLC will end on December 31, 2012 after eight
years. Board members were told that the City went out to bid and only one bid was
received . Spada noted that the one bid is from a vendor that comes with a lot of
experience . Spada stated that they will be going to City Council on December 3rd
for formal approval of the contract and the new vendor will begin on January 1,
2013. The Board was told that the restaurant will be shut down for the first week to
do some maintenance work. Discussion followed in regard to the new owner,
Craig Caldwell, and his experience. Waldman asked in regard to Dadiotis. Spada
replied that he did not bid.
Centennial Park Cyclo-Cross Race
In regard to last month's discussion on the request to hold a cyclo-cross event at
Centennial Park on Thanksgiving Day, Lee reported that the group has decided to
hold the race somewhere else. Lee stated that the group has said that they would
still like to hold a race at Centennial Park sometime next year.
IX . Cultural Arts Commission Update
x .
Black reported that the Cultural Arts Comm ission is currently considering several
projects that it can do.
Director's Choice
B lack told board members that generally in December a board meeting is not held
and if the board agrees, the December meeting will be cancelled. However, Black
explained that if any member wants a meeting or has an issued that they feel
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 91of95
l""dl L \J Mlldl.111 llt::ll L::> -.LU. Ulllt::J -l"dl 11.::. dJJU l'\t::l.I t::dLIUll ~u1111111::.::.1u11 IVllllU L~!.-Jdf!Udry .lU, .lU.l.::1
Please refer to section V for Park Signage
City of Englewood
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Minutes of January 10, 2013
I. Call to Order
The regular monthly meeting of the Englewood Parks and Recreation Commission was
called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Vice Chairperson Waldman at the Englewood City Center,
City Council Conference Room, 1000 Englewood Parkway.
II.
Present:
Absent:
Also Present:
Approval of Minutes
Mitch Waldman, Vice Chairperson
Douglas Garrett, Commission Member
Mark Husbands, Commission Member
Karen Miller, Commission Member
Bob Mccaslin , City Council Liaison (arrived at 5:40pm)
Duane Tucker, Englewood Schools Liaison
Donna Schnitzer, Cultural Arts Commission Liaison
Jerrell Black, Ex-Officio
Austin Gomes, Chairperson
Dave Lee, Manager of Open Space
Joe Sack, Recreation Manager
Bob Spada , Golf Manager
Jeff Jones, Recreation Program/Facility Supervisor
Vice Chairperson Waldman asked if there were any changes or corrections to
the minutes of November 8, 2012. There were none. The minutes were
approved as presented.
Vice Chairperson Waldman asked if there were any changes or corrections to
the minutes of December 13, 2012. There were none. The minutes were
approved as presented.
Ill. Scheduled Public Comment
There were no scheduled guests.
IV. Unscheduled Public Comment
There were no unscheduled guests.
V. Park Signage
Recreation Manager Dave Lee informed board members that in their packet are
examples of park signage with the changes that they had recommended at last
month's meeting. Lee told the Board that the first sign in the packet is the Park
Identification Sign that will be placed at the main entrance into the park. The
second sign is the Small Park Identification Sign that will be placed at secondary
entrances to the park. Lee reported that the other signs in the packet are
examples of the Rules and Regulations sign and a park reservation information
s ign. Lee pointed out the Rules and Regulations sign will now include a QR Code
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 92of95
•
•
•
•
•
•
t -.
VI.
VII.
that will link the customer to the City's website. Commission Member Mark
Husbands asked if park reservations can be made online. Lee stated that at this
time they cannot. Recreation Manager Joe Sack reported that plans are to have
online facility reservations in place later in the year. In regard to the park signage ,
commission members stated that they thought the new signage looked great.
Duncan Park Grant Update
Before discussion went to an update on the Duncan Park grant applications, Sack
introduced Jeff Jones, the new Recreation Program & Facility Supervisor for the
Englewood Recreation Center and stated that Jeff has been the Adult Sport
Recreation Program Administrator for the City of Englewood for the last twenty
years. Sack told the Board that the Department is very excited to have Jeff step up
into the new position. Jeff told the Board about himself and his new
responsibilities.
Discussion turned to an update on grant applications for Duncan Park. Lee
informed the Board that as they are aware, the Department was unsuccessful with
its GOCO grant application in August of last year. Lee reported that he and Sack
have been working diligently on an Arapahoe County Open Space grant
application that will be due the beginning of February and another grant application
for GOCO that is due in early March. Lee explained that they will be requesting
$250,000 from Arapahoe County and $350,000 from GOCO. Waldman asked
what the Department will do if it is unsuccessful with the grants . Lee replied that
they will phase the project.
Intergovernmental Agreement/Facility Usage, Englewood Schools
Black informed the Board that the Department of Parks and Recreation and
Englewood Schools are considering partnering together for an Arapahoe County
Open Space grant for a synthetic turf field at Englewood High School. Black
explained that a stipulation to all grant applications is that before the grant
application can be submitted , all Intergovernmental Agreements need to be in
place and finalized so a meeting has been scheduled with Brian Ewert, Englewood
Schools Superintendent, to discuss the agreement. Black said that they hope to
have the agreement completed in six months. Commission Member Miller asked
where the field will be. Black explained that it is the practice field behind the
stadium. Black then stated that they will be losing one of the fields at Hosanna
which will result in lost revenue for the City. The Board was told that the School
District has been very accommodating, agreeing that if a field is lost, the City can
use the new synthetic turf field to compensate for lost revenue . Black discussed
the current Intergovernmental Agreement that is in place between the City and
School District and plans to revisit it and condense all City/Schoo l IGA agreements
for inside and outside facility usage in to one agreement. Black stated again that it
is t hei r hope to have the agreement in place by mid-year so can they can submit a
grant application for 20 14 fund ing.
Waldman asked if the Department applies for an Arapahoe County grant fo r
Duncan Park and then the Arapahoe County grant with the School District, will
Arapahoe County award both grants . Black stated that he has seen agencies
receive two grants though it is more unusual than common. Black said that GOCO
will not award more than one grant to an entity per grant cycle wh il e Arapahoe
County will award up to two grants to an entity per cycle.
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 93of95
Part G Attachments -10. Other-Tacito Design-Total Design Fee Contract Amount
! l T 11Ci10 Dcsig11, In.-
! 5690 DTC Bouu:'.rrrl
j Sr111r 220 &rt 70,,,.,,
~ Engl.ewaotl. Co!tm:dc 80111
i 303 850 919 ~
1 FAX 303.850 9315
i
i
i :
i j l I Invoice 102095
~ I July 18. 2002
!
! Dave Lee
j Parks & Recreation
i City of Englewood ! 1155 West Oxford Avenue I Englewood, Colorado 80110
! I Re: Parks & Recreation Signage
j PO #020187
l
i I Total design fee con tract amount, Parks & Recreation Sigoage
! Fee deposit, 25% of total design fee contract amount, PAID
i
! i Work to date, to 80% completio n
;
j Color laserprints for client coordination
j Large formal color output & mounting far Parks Commission presentation
~
SS,525.00
120.00
112.37
$15,500.00
<3,875.00>
<S,525.00>
;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
i Total due, this invoice
i ! Design fee balance (50%}
i
~ j Payment due August 2, 2002.
l Thank you
I
j Federa!Taxpayer I "eotifi.,ti<>n N" mber. 841 Olra 281
i
i
t
2015 Standard/$mall Grant Application
Page 94 of 95 !
$8,757.37
$3,100.00
c
•
•
•
r
• -I _,..
~art G Attachments -10. Other-PKM Design Group-Park Signage Graphics Invoice
•
Bill To
Dave Lee
7353 S. Alton Way, Suite 125
Centennial. Colorado 80112
phone 303.804.0080
fax 303.804.0070
www .pkmdg.com
City of Englewood
Englewood Rec Cent ff
1155 W. Oxford Ave.
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Item Description
Field Review P .Miers -field review with Dave Lee
Graphics P.Hendrix-sign graphics for
Arapahoe County Grant
-----.. ·------------------
~alee payments to PKM Design Group. Inc.
353 S. Alton Woy: ~uite 125. _centenni<J!. ~O ~112
·Please direct·all·biR1ng ·questions·to · ?otric10 Mier5 at·
303.804.0080 or at pkm@pkmdg.com.
-.+.
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 95 of95
Invoice
Date Invoice#
12/30/2014 1903
Project
Park Sign Graphics
Period
Nov/Dec 2014
Qty Rate Amount
l 130.00 130.00
26.5 36.80 975.20
I Total $1,105.20 I
.•
• COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Date Agenda Item Subject
June 15, 2015 Bill for ordinance authorizing an
9 a ii intergovernmental agreement for
Arapahoe County Open Space grant
award for the construction of RiverRun
Trailhead Phase I
Initiated By Staff Source
Department of Parks and Recreation Joe Sack, Recreation Services Manager
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Mission : To promote and ensure a high quality of life, economic vitality, and a uniquely desirable
community identity.
Vision: To promote and ensure a high quality of life, economic vitality, and a uniquely desirable community
identity by proactively collaborating with our citizens and businesses, developing a safe environment,
creating opportunity, and through the provision of reliable, affordable and flexible services.
Previous Action : Resolution No. 6, Series of 2015, authorizing the City's Arapahoe County Open Space
• grant application for the construction of the RiverRun Trailhead Phase I.
•
Council Bill No. 56, Ordinance No. 50, series of 2014, authorizing an Intergovernmental Agreement
regarding the construction of drainage and flood control improvements for South Platte River at Oxford
Avenue between the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, the Colorado Water Conservation Board
and Arapahoe County by adding the City of Englewood, the City of Sheridan and the South Suburban Parks
and Recreation District as participants.
Council Bill No. 41, Ordinance No. 38, Series of 2011, authorizing an Intergovernmental Agreement
accepting the 2010 Riverside Park Planning grant between Arapahoe County and the City of Englewood,
Colorado.
Resolution No. 89 Series of 2010, in support of the City's Arapahoe County Open Space (ACOS) grant
application for the Riverside Park Planning grant.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that City Council adopt a bill for an ordinance authorizing an intergovernmental
agreement between the City of Englewood and Arapahoe County for the ACOS Grant award to construct
the RiverRun Trailhead Phase I.
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
Council authorized the application and acceptance of the Riverside Park planning grant in 2011. In 2014
Council authorized an Intergovernmental agreement with Urban Drainage and Flood Control District to
complete the design of the site. Urban Drainage Flood Control District (UDFCD) is managing the river
corridor project in partnership with City of Englewood, City of Sheridan, South Suburban Parks and
Recreation District, Colorado Water Conservation Board and Arapahoe County Open Space (ACOS) as
part of the South Platte Working Group. The South Platte Working Group members agreed that the river
downstream of Oxford Avenue provided recreational and economic benefits for the entire region and this
area was identified as RiverRun Trailhead. On January 20 , 2015, Council adopted and approved a
resolution authorizing the ACOS grant application for the construction of the RiverRun Trailhead Phase I.
The RiverRun Trailhead is a construction project along the South Platte River and Oxford Avenue. The
Trailhead is destined to become a major focal point for bikers using the Mary Carter Greenway Trail as well
as river enthusiasts enjoying kayaking, fishing and swimming. The Trailhead amenities will include a large
park pavilion, playground, restroom facilit i es, ADA access to the South Platte River and regional trail access.
The RiverRun Trailhead will be completed in multiple phases. Phase 1 -Site Preparation will include
removal of existing improvements, erosion and sediment control, construction surveying, earthwork and
stormwater facilities. This grant award is for Phase 1 only.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The Arapahoe County Open Space grant award is for $300,000 in grant funds with a required City cash
match of $100,000 (Budgeted-$75,000 Arapahoe County Shareback Funds, $25,000 Conservation Trust
Funds).
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Proposed Bill for an Ordinance
•
•
•
•
•
•
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 2015
BY AUTHORITY
COUNCIL BILL NO. 25
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER -------
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
ACCEPTING A 2015 GRANT OF ARAPAHOE COUNTY OPEN SPACE PROGRAM FUNDS
PROJECT NAME: RIVERRUN TRAILHEAD PHASE I, BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO AND THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE
COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO.
WHEREAS, the Englewood City Council authorized the application and acceptance of the
Riverside Park planning grant in 2011, and in 2014 City Council authorized an Intergovernmental
agreement with Urban Drainage and Flood Control District to complete the design of the site; and
WHEREAS, Urban Drainage Flood Control District (UDFCD) is managing the river corridor
project in partnership with the City of Englewood, City of Sheridan, South Suburban Parks and
Recreation District, Colorado Water Conservation Board and Arapahoe County Open Space as part
of the South Platte Working Group; and
WHEREAS, the South Platte Working Group members agreed that the river downstream of
Oxford A venue and is destined to become a focal point for bikers using the Mary Carter Greenway
Trail as well as river enthusiasts enjoying kayaking and fishing; and
WHEREAS, these Trailhead amenities will include a large park pavilion, playground, restroom
facilities, and ADA access to the South Platte River and regional trails; and
WHEREAS, the RiverRun Trailhead will be completed in multiple phases . Phase I -Site
Preparation will include removal of existing improvements, erosion and sediment control,
construction surveying, earthwork and stormwater facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Trailhead will be located on property owned the by the City of Englewood next
to the Broken Tee Golf Course which is located in the City of Sheridan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Englewood authorized an Intergovernmental
Agreement accepting the 2010 Riverside Park Planning grant between Arapahoe County and the
City of Englewood by the passage of Ordinance No. 38, Series of 2011; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Englewood authorized and intergovernmental
agreement regarding the construction of drainage and flood control improvements for South Platte
River at Oxford A venue between the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, the Colorado
Water Conservation Board and Arapahoe County by adding the City of Englewood,, the City of
Sheridan and the South Suburban Parks and Recreation District as participants by the passage of
Ordinance No. 50, Series of 2014; and
1
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Englewood supported the City's Arapahoe
County Open Space (ACOS) Grant application for RiverRun Trailhead Phase I by passage of
Resolution No. 6, Series 2015; and
WHEREAS, the City of Englewood was awarded the 2015 Grant of Arapahoe County Open
Space Program Finds Project Name: RiverRun Trailhead Phase I in an amount not to exceed
$300,000; and
WHEREAS, the passage of this Ordinance authorizes the City of Englewood to accept the
Arapahoe County Open Space Grant for the construction of the RiverRun Trailhead Phase I; and
WHEREAS, there are no federal funds being used for this grant for RiverRun Trailhead
Phase I.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes the
acceptance of the Arapahoe County Open Space 2015 Grant for RiverRun Trailhead Phase I,
attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
Section 2. The Mayor is authorized to execute and the City Clerk to attest and seal the
Intergovernmental Agreement accepting a 2015 Grant of Arapahoe County Open Space Program
Funds Project Name: RiverRun Trailhead Phase I, on behalf of the City of Englewood, Colorado .
Section 3 . No federal funds are being used for this grant for RiverRun Trailhead Phase I.
Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 15th day of June, 2015.
Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City's official newspaper on the 18th day of
June, 2015.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City's official website beginning on the 17th day of
June, 2015 for thirty (30) days.
Linda Olson, Mayor Pro Tern
ATTEST:
Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and passed on
first reading on the 15th day of June, 2015.
Loucrishia A. Ellis
3
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT REGARDING
2015 GRANT OF ARAPAHOE COUNTY OPEN SPACE PROGRAM FUNDS
PROJECT NAME: RIVERRUN TRAILHEAD PHASE I
This Intergovernmental Agreement ("Agreement"), is made and entered into by and
between THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF
ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO , (the "County") and THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, a municipality and political subdivision of the State of Colorado (the
"Grantee") (collectively , "Parties" and individually a "Party").
V.1IBREAS , on November 4 , 2003 , and on November 1, 2011, the voters of Arapahoe
County approved a county-wide sales and use tax to be deposited in the Arapahoe County Open
Space Fund and used for specified open space purposes as set forth in County Resolution No.
030381, as amended by Resolution No. 110637 (Open Space Resolution); and
WHEREAS , the Open Space Resolution authorizes the County to award discretionary
grants from its Open Space Fund to municipalities and special districts , as more fully set forth
therein; and
E
x
H • I
T
l
WHEREAS , on May 12 , 2015 the County approved the Grantee's Grant Proposal for the
River Run Trailhead Phase I Project ("Grant Project"), which is attached hereto and incorporated •
by reference herein as Exhibit A , subject to the execution of an intergovernmental agreement and
subject to the tenns and conditions contained herein; and
V/HEREAS , this intergovernmental agreement is authorized by Article XIV. Section 18
of the Colorado Constitution and COLO . REV. STAT.§ 29-1-203.
NOW, THEREFORE , the County and the Grantee agree as follo\vs:
1. Amount of Grant. The County hereby awards Grantee an amount not to exceed
$300,000 ("Grant Funds") for the Grant Project from the Arapahoe County Open
Space Fund.
2. Use of Grant Funds. The Grantee agrees that it shall only use the Grant Funds for
the Grant Project. as described in Exhibit A.
.,
.) . Disbursement of Grant Funds. Subsequent to execution of this Agreement, the
Grant Funds shall be paid via ACH transfer on a reimbursement basis upon
receipt of the approved status reports and documentation of expendinires as
outlined in Paragraph 10 below and no more often than quarterly. No more than
75% of the grant funds will be reimbursed prior to the Final Report approval. The
final 25% of grant funds will be reimbursed follO\ving the project inspection and
revie\v and approval of the Final Report and project deliverables
3. Time for Use of Grant Funds. The Grantee agrees that the Grant Project must
begin within 45 days of the a\vard notification. The Grantee agrees that the Grant
Project will be completed and the Grant Funds will be expended by no later than
•
•
•
•
4.
5.
7.
8 .
two years from the date of this fully executed Agreement, unless a longer period
of time is otherwise agreed to by the County in writing. The Grantee understands
and agrees that if the Grant Project cannot be completed by the end of the agreed
upon time period the County may require that the Grant Funds be refunded to the
County Open Space Grant Fund, be re-distributed to another agency and/or be
used for another viable and timely grant project.
Interest on Grant Funds. The Grantee further agrees that, after receipt of the
Grant Funds, the Grantee will use any interest earned on the Grant Funds only for
the Grant Project as set forth in Exhibit A.
Administration of Grant Project. The Grantee shall be responsible for the direct
supervision and administration of the Grant Project. The County shall not be
liable or responsible for any cost overruns on the Grant Project, nor shall the
County have any duty or obligation to provide any additional funding for the
Grant Project if the Grant Project cannot be completed with the awarded Grant
Funds. Grantee also agrees to comply with all local, state and federal
requirements while completing the Project unless specifically waived.
Grant Project Site Visits. Upon 24 hours written notice to the Grantee, the
Grantee agrees to allow the County to make site visits before, during, at the
completion of and/or after the Grant Project.
Acknowledgement of County by Grantee. The Grantee agrees to acknowledge
the County as a contributor to the Grant Project in all publications, news releases
and other publicity issued by the Grantee related to the Grant Project and agrees
to allow the County to do the same. If any events are planned in regards to the
Grant Project, the County shall be acknowledged as a contributor in the invitation
to such events. Grantee shall cooperate with the County in preparing public
information pieces, providing photos of the Grant Project from time to time, and
providing access to the Grant Project for publicity purposes. Event information,
event materials and press release information related to the Grant Project must be
sent to the County Grant Administrator for review and filing.
9. Required Sign at Project Site. The County agrees to purchase a standard sign for
each grant project. Grantee agrees to pay the sign cost to the County for each
grant project. Grantee agrees to erect and permanently maintain at least one sign
in a publicly visible area in recognition of the Grant from the Arapahoe County
Open Space Program. If the Grantee wishes to use their own sign and design, the
Grantee must submit the sign location, design, and wording to the County Grant
Administrator for approval prior to manufacture and/or installation of such sign.
Such sign shall be erected prior to the completion of the Grant Project or its
public opening, whichever is earlier.
10. Report Requirements. On or before January 3pt and July 3pt annually, the
Grantee agrees to provide the County with Grant Project Progress Reports that
conform to the format provided by the County. Each Grant Project Progress
Report shall include supporting financial documentation as requested in the form
2
provided. Upon completion of the Grant Project, the Grantee also agrees to submit •
to the County a Final Report that conforms to the format provided by the County;
a final spreadsheet comparing the original budget to actual expenses that certifies
Grant Funds used in compliance with the Open Space Resolution; and GIS data
with location and boundaries of the Grant Project. The Final Report shall also
include supporting financial documentation as requested in the County report
form and high resolution photographs of the progress and finished results of the
Grant Project. The Grantee further agrees to provide the County with digital
copies of said photographs, delivered as separate high resolution jpeg images.
The Final Report shall be submitted within three (3) months of Grant Project
completion unless a longer period of time has been agreed to by the County in
writing. The County shall be allowed to use information and images from these
reports in publications, public information updates, and on the County's web site.
11. Failure to Submit Required Reports. Upon written notice from the County's Open
Space Grants Administrator, informing the Grantee that it has failed to submit any
required status report and/or final report, the Grantee shall submit such reports to
the County through the County's Open Space Grants Administrator within thirty
(30) days, and, if it fails to do so, the Grantee shall be deemed to be in violation
this Agreement pursuant to Paragraph 15, below.
12. Record Keeping Requirements. The Grantee shall maintain a complete set of
books and records documenting its use of the Grant Funds and its supervision and
administration of the Grant Project. The County or any of its duly authorized
representatives shall have reasonable access to any books, documents, papers, and
records of the Grantee which are pertinent to the Grant Project for the purpose of
making an audit, examination, or excerpts. The Grantee shall keep all books,
documents, papers, and records, which are pertinent to the Grant Project, for a
minimum of three years.
13. Changes to Grant Project. The Grantee agrees and understands that its Grant
Project, once it has been approved by the County, may not be changed without the
County's prior approval. Proposed changes must be formally requested using the
applicable Grant Project Form provided by the County. Changes may not begin
until the County has issued an approval, which may also require the execution of
an amendment to this Agreement.
14. Maintenance. Grantee agrees to assume responsibility for continuous long-term
maintenance and public safety of open space lands, trails, recreation facilities,
amenities, signage or other projects funded by the Grant Funds.
15. Failure to Comply and Reimbursement of Grant Funds. The Grantee understands
and agrees that the County may require the Grantee to reimburse the County if
any portion of the Grant Funds are not used in accordance with its approved Grant
Proposal and this Agreement. Failure to comply with the terms of this Agreement
shall result in default and the Grantee shall be ineligible for any future Grant
3
•
•
•
•
•
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Funds until the violation is remedied or after such other time period as determined
by the County.
Remedies. The rights and remedies of the County as set forth in this Agreement
shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights or remedies provided
by law.
No Waiver of Rights. A waiver by either Party to this Agreement of the breach of
any term or provision of this Agreement shall not operate or be construed as a
waiver of any subsequent breach by either Party.
Relationship of the Parties. The Grantee shall perform all duties and obligations
under this Agreement as an independent contractor and shall not be deemed by
virtue of this Agreement to have entered into any partnership, joint venture ,
employer/employee, or other relationship with the County.
No Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement shall give or allow any
claim or right of action whatsoever by any third party, including, but not limited
to, any agents or contractors of the Grantee.
Severability. Should any one or more provisions of this Agreement be
determined to be illegal or unenforceable, all other provisions nevertheless shall
remain effective; provided, however, the Parties shall forthwith enter into good
faith negotiations and proceed with due diligence to draft a provision that will
achieve the original intent of the Parties hereunder.
21. Written Amendment Required. This Agreement may be amended, modified, or
changed, in whole or in part, only by written agreement duly authorized and
executed by the County and the Grantee.
22. Venue. Venue for the trial of any action arising out of any dispute hereunder shall
be in Arapahoe County District Court, pursuant to the appropriate rules of civil
procedure.
23. Notices. Notices, as referred to in this Agreement, shall be sent to :
COUNTY: Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe County
5334 South Prince Street
Littleton, Colorado 80120-1136
and
Arapahoe County Attorney
5334 South Prince Street
Littleton, Colorado 80120-1136
and
Arapahoe County Open Space Grants Program Administrator
6934 S Lima St, Unit A
Centennial, Colorado 80112
4
and
GRANTEE:
City of Englewood
1155 W. Oxford Avenue
Englewood, CO 80110
24. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance
with the laws of the State of Colorado.
25. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of
which will be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together will
constitute one and the same agreement.
26. Incorporation of Exhibits. Unless otherwise stated in this Agreement, any
exhibits, applications, resolutions, or other documents referenced in this
Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into this Agreement for all
purposes.
27. Section Headings. The headings for any section of this Agreement are only for the
convenience and reference of the Parties and are not intended in any way to
define, limit or describe the scope or intent of this Agreement.
28. Assignment. The rights, or any parts thereof, granted to the Parties herein may be
assigned only with the prior written consent of the non-assigning party.
29. Extent of Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the
Parties hereto. The Parties agree that there have been no representations made
regarding the subject matter hereof other than those, if any, contained herein, that
this Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the
subject matter hereof, and further agree that the various promises and covenants
contained herein are mutually agreed upon and are in consideration of one
another.
30. Signatures. The signatories to this Agreement represent that they are fully
authorized to execute this Agreement and bind their respective entities.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County and the Grantee have executed this Agreement as
of the date set forth below.
DATEDthis ____ dayof ________ ,2015.
ATTEST: GRANTEE:
5
•
•
•
•
•
•
By:_. ______ ;.__ ___ _
Name -Randy P. Penn
Title -Mayor
ATTEST:
By:~--------~
Name
Title
By:
-~-----------~ Name
Title -
-Loucrishi~·A. Ellis
City Clerk
COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE
STATE OF COLORADO
By: _____________ _
Shannon Carter, Director, Intergovernmental
Relations and Open Spaces
Pursuant to Resolution No. 150211
6
AFJAPAHOE COUNT Y
COLORADO'S FIRST
2015 Standard Grant
Grant Proposal
Arapahoe County Open Space
City of Englewood
t?~rks ainci Recreation Department
RiverRun Trailhead Phase I
•
•
•
•
•
•
PART A-Application Su mmary Form
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Englewood Parks
RiverRun Trailhead Phase I
PART B-Minimum Qualifications and Eligibility form
PART C-Appli cation Checklist
PPJ~T D-Project Timeline
PART E-Pr oject Budget
PART F-Prnject Details
PART G-Attachments
1. Resolution
2. Long-term Commitment Letter
3. Evidence of Property Ownership
4. Support Lett~rs
5. Documentation of opposition and responses
6. Evidence of Commitment from funding partners
i. Photos
8. Site Maps
9. GIS sha pefile
Page 1
Page 3
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 13
Page 24
Page 25
Page 27
Page 28
Page 30
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 41
Page 44
2015 Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Application
Part A-Application Summary Form
Grant Category {check one):
X Standard
Ci Small
This application will be scored on a 100-point scale by the evaluation committee and must
Score a minimum of 75 points.
Applicant Information
Name: City of Englewood
Address: 1155 West Oxford Avenue, Englewood, CO 80110
Primary Contact: Joe Sack I Title: Recreation Services Manager
Telephone: 303-762-2682
Email: jsack@englewoodgov.org
Primary Partner Information
(Additional partners should be discussed in Part F: Project Details, Question 13 of the application.)
Name: Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
Address: 2480 W. 25th Ave., Suite 156-B, Den,ver COJj0211
Contact: Laura Kroeger .,. I Tiile:'~sistant Manager
., .. .. .: ·,~ Telephone: 303-455-6277 .. . ··' . .. ·•
Email: lkroeger@udfcd.org I '' ..
Partner Responsibilities: River and trail ·ent:iarice.ments, de~ignation of location as a trailhead
~ • . 1
I .. _{;
·-.. .. ...
Proj~q tliformatic)n'
Grant Category: Standard Grant ~~-...
Project Type: Construction Project
Project Title: RiverRun Trailhead Phase I ·· -. ..
Address: 2101 West Oxford Avenue Englewood, CO 80110
City or Unincorporated Arapahoe County: City of Sheridan
GPS Coordinates: 39°38'35.51"N 105°00'51.59"W
Grant Request: $300,000.00
Cash Match Total: $100,000 I Percentage of Total Project: 25%
Total Project Amount: $400,000
Brief Project Summary (400 words or less): project description, components, need, goal,
b eneficiary, planning, community input, results
The RiverRun Trailhead is a construction project along the South Platte River and Oxford
Avenue. The Trailhead is a park-like setting which will include a large park pavilion, playground,
restroom facilities, ADA access to the South Platte River and regional trail access. This location
is destined to become a major focal point for bikers using the Mary Carter Greenway Trail as
well as river enthusiasts enjoying kayaking, fishing and swimming.
The RiverRun Trailhead will be completed in multiple phases. Phase 1-Site preparation will
include removal of existing improvements, erosion and sediment control, construction
surveying, earthwork and stormwater facilities. This grant request is for Phase 1 only. The
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 1of44
•
•
•
•
•
•
proposed trailhead footprint includes existing improvements such as asphalt, concrete
curb/sidewalk, landscape plantings, water lines, stormwater infrastructure, and light
poles/electrical system, all of which must be removed. Erosion and sediment control "Best
Management Practices" (BMPs) will be installed to protect against soil erosion and sediment
laden water leaving the trailhead site during construction. BMPs will include silt fence,
stabilization of staging areas, vehicle tracking control, sediment logs, and inlet protection.
Construction surveying will be completed to establish proposed grades for earthwork and
layout of the stormwater system. The proposed trail head will significantly lower the existing
grade to allow ADA accessibility and connections to the river and planned regional trail.
Earthwork will include excavation and fill on-site and excavation and haul off-site. Existing
topsoil will be stripped and stockpiled for reuse in later phases. Constructed stormwater
facilities will capture, detain, treat and discharge to the South Platte River. Facilities will include
an inlet in the parking lot, piping to a detention pond, a sand filter with an underdrain system,
outlet structure from the pond, and outfall piping and embankment armoring in river.
The Trailhead is a part of the larger South Platte River/RiverRun Trail project, which extends
from Union Avenue to Oxford Avenue. The partnered project between the cities of Englewood,
Sheridan and Littleton and other organizati9ns ineludjng South Suburban Parks and Recreation
District, Urban Drainage and Flood Control a·nd the ·Color~do Water and Conservation Board will
enhance the South Platte corridor as a recr,eationaJ ,re~ource for the entire region. The river-
. " .. I
oriented project will provide eastside an!'.f .W~$ts,kle trai.ls~ i,rtlproved river access and in-river
enhancements while restoring and re~italizl~1g t~e river: an.a' its habitat .
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 2of44
-. ~
, .
. · ~ ' .:-,_,,;;, r --,., , .
Part B -Minimum Qualification and Eligibility Form
Certify the below minimum qualifications and eligibility criteria:
Applicant Name: City of Englewood
Application Category and Type: Standard Grant, Construction Project
Project Name: RiverRun Trailhead Phase I
Briefly answer the following qualification questions:
1. Is applicant in good standing with Arapahoe County Open Space? Discuss past
performance (past five years); discuss all on-going Arapahoe County Open Space Grants,
and the number and types of grants for which your agency is applying in this cycle.
The City of Englewood is in good standing with Arapahoe County Open Space. Over the
past 5 years, Englewood has received 6 grants. All grants have been completed within
the allotted time frame .
The City of Englewood is in good standing with Arapahoe County Open Space. Over the
past 5 years, Englewood has received 6 grants. All grants have been completed within
the allotted time frame . The one exceptlonJs the Riverside Planning Grant, which
expanded in project scope due to a ·m~Jor project.sponsored by Urban Drainage and
Flood Control and South Platte Working·Group, Th~ project encompasses an area from
. -' ~ l ' ,.
Union Avenue and the South Platte ~iver)o O~ord1 ~venue and the South Platte River .
. ' -. , : . ,. . ' .. , I
•
: ,; ·: .. ' j,'
Englewood currently has 2 on-going: gr~nts .(Hosan ·na Synthetic Turf Field and Duncan •
Park Redevelopment). Both gra.ilt_s ~re ift. tlie fini]!Fstages of completion with final reports
pending. -_, ·
Englewood will apply for 2 standard grantsthis cycle. The grants are for RiverRun
Trailhead Phase I (Construction Project) and Park Gateway Enhancements (Site
Improvement).
2. Discuss project alignment with the Arapahoe County Open Space Master Plan; local
adopted Master Plan; or other approved planning documents.
The Open Space Master Plan provides a 100-year vision, 25-year master plan and 5-year
action plan for implementing the purpose and goals of the program. The vision states
that the County will be forward thinking, understand and embrace the open space, park
and trail needs of current residents, and define a harmonious relationship between
people and nature in the County for future generations. The vision for the Program is
summarized as: Healthy Lands, Healthy Communities, and Healthy People .
The RiverRun Trailhead project defines the mission of the Arapahoe County Open Space
Plan .
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 3of44
•
•
•
•
• Acquire, conserve and protect open space -The RiverRun Trailhead project will
develop this underutilized space into a park area with access to the South Platte
River.
• Build county open space parks and trails -With the completion of this park the
location will be preserved as a permanent park to provide green space for this
underserved neighborhood of residents in Arapahoe County.
• Plan countywide trails network: This project is destined to become a trail head to the
Mary Carter Greenway Regional Trail system with both east and west side river
access.
• Cooperative partnership work-Through this project many partnerships were
developed or enhanced. The partnered project between the cities of Englewood,
Sheridan and Littleton and other organizations including South Platte Working
Group, South Suburban Parks and Recreation District, Urban Drainage and Flood
Control and the Colorado Water and Conservation Board, area businesses and
neighbors have pledged to develop this park space.
• Leverage funding for open space, parks and trails -The RiverRun Trailhead project
has leveraged a number offunding sources including ACOS Grant Funds, Shareback
Funds, Conservation Trust Funds and City pf Englewood General Funds. The trail
project overall has financial supRort fr.om l:frb~n Drainage and Flood Control,
' . ' . . ~ •\
Colorado Water and Conservatip1J ffoard /C.ity 9,t Sheridan and other South Platte
~ •• • p
Working Group members.; / ' \ ;;
'. . . ·'° :: '· . --. . . ; ~
3. Describe how this project addresse~ sp.e~iflc o~jec;tjves in the County Open Space
Resolution #030381/#110637. Dqcu171,e~tJ~postftd'on the Open Space Grant Program
. f•' . , ....
page of the County Website. · .. --
The RiverRun Trailhead proj~ct specific;ally qddr.esses the following objectives of the
County Open Space Resolution #030381/#110637.
• Preserve urban and rural open space and natural areas -This project will preserve
this area as a park to be used by all current and future residents of Arapahoe
County.
• Protect lands that preserve water quality in rivers, lakes and streams-The RiverRun
Trail head and Trail Project have been specifically designed to protect the South
Platte water resource. This project will save this area from commercial or other
types of development.
• Provide, maintain and improve neighborhood parks, open space, sports fields, picnic
facilities and biking, walking and multi-use trails. The development of the RiverRun
Trailhead fills the fundamental basic need of providing park and open space. The
RiverRun Trailhead will provide park area, playground, pavilion, restroom facilities,
trail and river access. Improvements made by this project will enhance the outdoor
experience while encouraging youth and their families to spend more time outdoors
in their community.
• Protect wildlife habitat and corridors -The RiverRun trail project calls for the
channelization of the river which will improve water flow and water conditions .
These changes are expected to improve the stagnate fish habitat in the South Platte
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page4of 44
River. The Improved trail access on both sides of the river will ensure that the river
corridor will remain protected.
Acknowledge the minimum qualification components listed below. All components are
required to meet minimum qualifications:
-" All Items on the enclosed application checklist are included In the application
-" All questions are answered in Part F and all supporting documents are attached In Part G
-" All budget forms are attached, completed and signed by the agency's highest authority
-1' Application format and document order follow Instructions
-1' Above eligibility and qualification questions are answered and meet Arapahoe County
Open Space eligibility requirements
-" All required forms are signed by agency's highest authority
-" Minimum cash match requirement met (%of total project)
Applicant certifies that all of the above lte s.are•lnc uded In the application and that all
Information submitted is true to edge.
'.\
Authorized Signature: ~~~~~~~~;t:::!:
(must be signed by h h
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 5 of 44
Date: .&r-a-
•
•
•
•
•
•
Project Title: River Run Trailhead Phase I
Part B -Minimum Qualification and Eligibility Form (cont'd)
For Arapahoe County Use Only:
Initial Review Date (pre-qualification):----------------
• Minimum Qualifications Met (yes/no)?
• Past Performance and Status: eligible for funding, probationary status necessary (e.g.
special award terms or funding conditions), or ineligible:
• Application Contents, Formatting and Overall Presentation:
Grant Program Administrator Signature:---------------
', .
'l ., . \ · ..
; I
·I ·' 1"
Final Review Date (after evaluation):-· . ..;.;."_,-----------'--------------
···.I . I 1'1' I .
...
• Minimum Score Met After Evaluation:
• Final Ranking and Recommendation After Evaluation:'
• Comments:
Grant Program Administrator Signature:---------------
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 6of44
Part C-Appllcatlon Checklist
Use the application checklist to verify that all of the required documents are Included In this
application In the order listed below. All sections are required to meet minimum qualifications •
./ Part A -Application Summary Form
./ Part B -Minimum Qualifications and Ellgibillty Form (must be signed)
./ Part C-Appllcatlon Checklist (must be signed)
./ Part 0-Project Tlmeline
./ Part E -Project Budget Narrative and Forms (all forms must be completely filled out and
signed)
./ Part F -Project Details (narrative response to project questions)
./ Part G -Attachments {Identify each attachment with the table of contents cover page
and list attachments In the following order)
1. Evidence of support from highest authority (official letter or resolution)-
lncludlng commitment to complete the project; statement that matching funds
are secured; and certification that the project will be open to the public or serve
a public purpose upon completion
2. Evidence of commitment to long~alntenance (official letter or resolution)
3. Evidence of property ow~efshiP/. iii ~ss (legal documentation)
4. Evidence of communi~if°Ji(I e · \L'PPOrt -maximum of 5)
5. Documentation of opP,qslt!W ~onsest(if applicable)
6. Evidence of commltmenelfoli ding ~ ers (cash match/in-kind match
support letters) ~~ ~
7. Photos (pre-submittal) Y ~
8. Site maps (project locatlo ps)
9. GIS shapefile, if applicable (in uae on compact disc)
10. Other (clearly title: acqulsitlor(do"cum'ehtatiOn) If a'p~llcable, or other supporting
documents) ·; ., · ,,, . ,. ,· ,. ,. 1:.
Applicant certifies that all of the above items are Included In the application, In the order listed
above, and that all Information submitted Is true to the best of their knowledge.
Authorized Signature:~ ?
(must be signed by hig~y)
Print Name and Title: .. :br...,,_u.._ ~(.e...K
j).,.. .. ~ •"" ___,.. R~~
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 7of44
Date: fo.:{?-/-f-
•
•
•
•
•
•
Part D -Project Timeline (S points)
Use the below project timeline sample as a guide to complete your proposed project timeline.
Project timeline must be realistic to receive full points.
Task Jun Jul Sep
2015 2015 2015
Grant
Notification
IGA Signed
Construction
Contract
completed
Construction -
Phase I Begin
Erosion
Sediment
Control
Established
Demolition and
Site Preparation
Construction
Surveying
Earthwork and
Site Grading
Stormwater
Detention
Construction
Final Report
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 8 of 44
Oct
2015
Nov Dec Jan Mar Sep Nov Jan
2015 2015 2016 2016 2016 2016 2017
;•·r· ..
' ., ...
. .
,,.
' \ . -
,.. . ~ ... . ' :.,~ . . .· \' ~ ., :•
'
,·. : I
::.'.·'.;!
..
Part E -Project Budget Narrative and Forms (10 points)
Budget Narrative: Provide a clear and concise budget narrative for this project (250 words or
less).
The RiverRun Trailhead will be completed in multiple phases. Phase 1-Site preparation will
include removal of existing improvements, erosion and sediment control, construction
surveying, earthwork and stormwater facilities.
Demolition and site preparation will cost $60,000. Erosion and sediment control is budgeted at
$10,000. Construction surveying will cost $10,000 and will be completed to establish proposed
grades for earthwork and layout of the stormwater system . The Trailhead will require
significant earthwork to lower the existing grade to allow ADA accessibility and connections to
the river and planned regional trail. Earthwork will include excavation and fill on-site and
excavation and haul off-site which will cost $240,000. Phase I construction will also include the
construction of stormwater facilities for $80,000.
Budget Forms:
All project budget forms must be completely fi!_le ,d out following_ the rules and regulations set forth in
the application guidelines and instructio~s.· Each b1,1~get formm·ust be signed by the highest authority in
your agency and included in this section rofttie appli~a-tion. Th~1 ~01lowing project budget forms are
•
attached and required to be complete and. included in the appli~ation to meet minimum qualifications: •
• Summary Budget Form: The summary' bu.dg~t.forin rtju-~t be fully completed and successfully
match up with the budget narrative; the:'grant ·budge { form, the match budget form and the
selection criteria questions.
• Grant Budget Form: The grant-budget form ·mustbe completed with sufficient detail to be
accepted. Please reference the sample budget for the expected level of detail. Budget items
are to be broken down into categories, and then broken down into the detailed use of funds
within each category by line item and cost.
• Match Budget Form: The match budget form must be completed with sufficient detail to be
accepted. Please reference the sample budget for the expected level of detail. Budget items
are to be broken down into categories, and then broken down into the detailed use of funds
within each category by line item and cost. The match budget form includes cash match and in-
kind match. Only cash match counts toward the percentage of match required . The cash match
requirement is 25% of the total project amount for Standard Grants and 10% of the total project
cost for Small Grants. In-kind match is significant and shows partnership and community
support for the project. Administrative costs to prepare the grant application are not an eligible
expense.
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 9of44
•
• 11 §. §
I 8 i
J .. ...
I ~ .,., ......
\-,~~ ! :t
I
!
~
I
11 I §. • j B
I w
i
1 an -~
i ... ....
• 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 10of44
i
J
! Ill
Q. i J ~ ~ .a& I ~ !
I~ i ; ~ ~ J! i
"'Cl...,
Ill 0 oa ...
ftl "' ~ "' 0 6T -a. t a.
~
3
~
C\
iil
::ll -> "C
"5!.
i
g
•
Part E-Grant Budcet Form/Use of Funds
Category Detailed Use of Funds per Category
=.. _:_ •• Sediment Control ISlt fence, llllbllzed ataglng area, sediment conbal
!logs, Inlet prcbtctlan
ICleallng anc1 grubbing, 1reellhrub NmOVlll, tree
DemoliUon & Site Preperalian on. sawcut1ntmova1 uphalt, demollon or
concrftt lidewaldcurb. f8llKMI of light poles.
lremOval of smmwnter inlelalpiping.
Earthwork & Siie Gradino Excavate & lfoclple topsoi, earthwort-NI on site,
~sthwolk haul on lie.
!Construction SuMtylng Construction survey slaking, grade cantn:J1. PR1JeC1
~Is. and layout
aler Inlet atruc:Ue & piping frotn parlllng lol
Stonm...,.... Detention --pond, land Ber syslem, outlet strucbn
ioulfal to rtver, autfallrbMk armoring
Appdcant: Oty of Enpiwoad
SlgnatuN: <;Zxo/~
Date: / /. /.
~ .
•
Grant Request Amount
$10.000 $10.00D
$35,000 $35.000
$165,000 $165,0DD
$10,000
$10.000
$80,000.00 $80,000
$300,080
Pl"Djed Title RlverAun Tralhead Phase I
Nam• and Title: .loa Sack
~---------------Rec re a tioft Service• Manager
•
•
I
~
j
I
e I I
"" l
J
I
)
z:
~
l ..
J
l
J 'I I
I
I
I
i 8
p J
i!.1Jj1
11 l. 1:
J a
oO
I ~
• 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 12of44
! I ~ ~ *
0 .,.
1.
~ 8 ... .,.
.... II II ~ ~ ... .. .l I ! II .. ~
~i ~ z
I 14~ s'
i! J ill
f
Cl
i ..,
:I
I~
Part F -Project Details (75 points)
Applicants must respond to all of the following questions to meet minimum qualifications. This
section is worth 75 points. Applicants must limit this section to 10 pages and answer all
questions to meet minimum qualifications. If attachments/supporting documentation apply to
a question answer please fully answer the question and reference the document in Part G.
Please do not answer a question as "N/A". If a question is not applicable, please explain why it
is not applicable to be considered for the full amount of points.
Select the Grant Category:
X Standard Grant: $50,100-$300,000 funding opportunity, 25% of total project amount
minimum cash match requirement
O Small Grant: $100-$50,000 funding opportunity, 10% of total project amount
minimum cash match requirement
Select the Project Type:
Project Type/Project Details: The project categories for the standard and small grant
applications are below: , · >: ' · ·~ _.,,
O Trail Project: Projects that are m6stly·t:rail tonstf:u.ction or renovation/restoration, trail-
related bridges, trail-related ro 'ad :crtjssi~g$; -~r tr~if'head parking and shelters.
J'; .,.J'·.~~ .... ·: .. L· . ~ ,,.,.~
O Site Improvement Projects: Prqjetjs"fpr;,site impr~~ement, restoration and
·, '.· _,,;· • ' 1" :~: ... ·' ~
repair/replacement including:;,natur~l ;f~vegetatio.il/restoration, park improvements,
.,_ \ ; • 1 r,~;.: ' :·; ;:'
restoration, repair/replacemeritJmay ,!ndu~e .playgrounds, shelters, sport fields,
landscaping). This category mayint lrlde ihteri.9r'trail segments or connections, but the
majority of the project should be sitctimprovements other than trail.
X Construction Project: Construction projects may include new park amenities such as
playgrounds, shelters, sport fields, restro'oms, arid 'lhtedor trails or connections.
0 Acquisition Project (standard grant only): Eligible projects involve fee simple
acquisition of land for public open space, park or trails; acquisition of buffer land;
acquisition of a conservation easement and/or acquisition of water rights.
n Environmental Project/Cultural Education or Interpretation Project: Projects focused
on environmental or cultural education/interpretation installations may include
associated sign bases, panels, landscaping, benches and shelters.
fJ Other Project: Other allowable project categories include: stream-related projects,
wildlife habitat, and water quality. These projects should not fit into any of the other
project categories. Please contact the County Grant Administrator for questions related
to allowable projects.
Selection Criteria Questions (75 points):
1. Describe the project goal, extent of scope and expected results. Be specific; discuss
what the project will provide, quantities, size, project elements, useful life of project
components, and deliverables. Discuss the current condition of the project site and
what improvements or changes are being proposed and why. Provide detailed maps
and photos in Part G. Describe how the project will be designed, constructed and
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 13of44
•
•
•
•
•
•
managed and how you will choose vendors, materials, systems, etc. Describe how this
project improves access and connectivity to any existing trail network, natural
resources, and/or community resources. If this is an educational project, discuss the
long term educational outcomes expected as a result of this project and how the project
connects people to each other, the natural environment and/or community resources.
Complete the budget form in Part E consistent with this narrative (15 points)
The RiverRun Trailhead is part of a major river corridor improvement project in and
along the South Platte River adjacent to the trailhead site. Urban Drainage Flood
Control District (UDFCD) is managing the river corridor project in partnership with City
of Englewood, City of Sheridan, South Suburban Parks and Recreation District, Colorado
Water Conservation Board, the South Platte Working Group and Arapahoe County Open
Space. The overall project includes a mile of regional trail along the east bank of the
South Platte River, recreational and habitat enhancements in the river, access to the
river, parking lot improvements at Oxford Avenue on the west bank, and upland park
amenities. The Trail head is an integrated component of the overall river corridor
project.
The existing site is underused. CL!Fr'ently a majority of the trailhead site is an existing
asphalt parking lot, turf areas, and nativ~:ar.eas f Tqe parking lot is too steep to meet
ADA requirements and stormwaterJa.cJf[ti~~ ~re unqerslzed and do not meet current
standards. Existing grades create 'a Jilgh.area th·at ~lbcks views and access to the South
Platte River. · 1
. • • • ,~. '/.t_.~
/" l' ' . . '
... ~.. _-·,· "',. ,.·'-.-:_ -~···,{l"
The Trailhead is a 4 acre multi:.'.purpose· P,.roject with goals to engage the South
Platte River, expand access to the Mar'{ c·arter Greenway Regional Trail system and
provide a destination for trail users and the surrounding communities to recreate, relax
or host an event. It will resu°liin a ·unique usefr experience unlike anything else in the
Englewood park system or along the greenway trail. The proposed trailhead will
include:
• Integration with existing and proposed regional trails -plaza and access points
• Shelter structure, 200-250 person capacity (pre-fabricated type)
• Increase parking capacity -199 parking stalls including 4 ADA accessible stalls (1. 75/
acre)
• Playground -natural play theme
• Restroom (pre-fabricated type)-three toilets for men and women
• Landscaping & Irrigation
• River access from trailhead
• Stormwater facilities that meet current standards -capture, detention, treatment
and conveyance
The Trailhead will be built in phases. This grant request is for Phase 1-Site
Preparation. Site preparation will include removal of existing improvements, erosion
and sediment control, construction surveying, earthwork and stormwater facilities . The
following is a summary of each category proposed in Phase 1:
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 14 of44
• Erosion Sediment Control -Silt fence, stabilized staging area, sediment control logs, •
Inlet protection: Disturbed area= 3 acres
• Demolition & Site Preparation -Clearing and grubbing (2 acres), tree/shrub removal,
tree protection, Sawcut/removal asphalt (6500 square yards), demolition of
concrete sidewalk/curb (500 linear feet), removal of light poles (4 poles), removal of
stormwater inlets/piping (425 linear feet)
• Earthwork & Site Grading -Excavate & stockpile topsoil (1900 cubic yards),
earthwork-fill on site (3000 cubic yards), earthwork-haul off site (13,000 cubic
yards)
• Construction Surveying -Construction staking, grade control, project limits and
layout
• Stormwater Detention -Stormwater inlet structure ((1) Type R) & piping (24" pipe/
25 linear feet) from parking lot, detention pond, sand filter system (filter
media/perforated ABS underdrain), outlet structure (custom reinforced concrete).
Design life of concrete pipe and structures is SO years, detention pond and filter
system design life is 25 years with ongoing maintenance and replacement of filter
media.
The Trailhead is currently undeqfesi.gn by~MA~ughlin Whitewater Design Group (Civil
Engineer) and OHM Design (Larl'dscape)\(~gitect)!<?5% design drawings were
completed in August 2014. Fi~,~I pe~ign :;vfii oe '~orp'pleted by May 2015. Naranjo Civil
! ;.: -.. · , -,. ·r . ~t : ·;, ·1
Contractors has been selected throu~ll tfle Ut~an Dtainage and Flood Control District's
' .'O .••• • ' ''" Project Partners Program. This .pfogr~rrtseleg~·ccjptractors from the District's pre-
'; -·' • ;. ·'. '.;' •' , . -·-;~''<-· .. .,.. ,rf
qualified contractors list. There ate ~¢veral adv~ritages to collaborating and engaging
with the contractor during planning ··and desigrC Cost estimates are more accurate
because they have been prepared by Naranjo who is building the project. Value
engineering is completed dur:ing-the design processvby-contractor feedback on
constructability of designs and materials specified. Lastly, the contractor better
understands the project goals and objectives by being involved with planning and
design. Once the design is completed a construction contract will be negotiated with
Naranjo to build the project.
2. Describe the community/neighborhood and user groups the project will serve. Discuss
the type of users (children, adults, seniors, families, sports leagues, youth groups, etc.)
the project will serve and estimate the number of user groups annually that will benefit
from the project. How did you arrive at this estimate? Describe the service area for this
project (how far will users travel to use the project site). (5 points)
The RiverRun Trailhead serves as part of a regional trail and recreational amenity for
users along the South Platte River and the Mary Carter Greenway Regional Trail system .
Cyclists, joggers, rollerbladers, kayakers, walkers, fishermen and wildlife viewers of all
ages utilize the trail system on a daily basis. It is estimated from a visual inspection of
the existing trail that tens of thousands of individuals and groups use this trail and will
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 15 of44
•
•
•
•
•
benefit from a new trailhead annually. As this trail Is a regional draw for cycling and
kayaking, the service area for users is estimated to be a radius of 20 miles or more.
3. Describe any scenic, historic or cultural values associated with this project. Will they be
preserved or restored? Describe specific natural resources at the site, including habitat
and/or water. List predominant wildlife species and vegetation on site. Discuss impacts
to these resources as a result of this project. If this is a conservation easement
acquisition project, describe the conservation values and public benefits/value of the
land, easement or water resource . (5 points)
There are no historic or cultural values associated with the RiverRun Trailhead
Development (Phase I). However, the site contains some scenic values associated with
being adjacent to the South Platte River. The river was channelized through this section
by the US Army Corps of Engineers to prevent major flooding events . This project aims
to improve the scenic value of the property by enhancing views to the river from the
trail head . The site is an important riparian corridor link from being situated along the
Platte River . There are native and non-native tree species (cottonwood, Siberian elm,
ash and catalpa) which were planti;.d:as pa_r:t :of.the Broken Tee Golf Course and a river
beautification project back in the· fate !'~~Cts ; Tll~. habitat value would be categorized as
med i um. Many birds and anim~ls.mig ~ate'.~pand rd9wn along the Platte River. Typical
bird species include many spe~j~~.ofA uc ~~ bli.J~ ti M pn, sparrows, robins, finch, geese,
etc. Animal species include be:~ve.r:i f9~, ~eer, .. q:;>yot~, skunk, rabbit, etc. Vegetation on
the site includes irrigated blueg~~ss/dtyiaod,_gras~e s and many broad leaf weedy plants
associated with disturbed soils. 1f.ripa~s '.t o;t~~ n,~t~ral resources are considered to be
low. Riparian access for movement 'u·p.amf.doW'n the river will not be adversely affected
as new trees, boulders and landscaping will be added to the site .
4. Discuss the ownership and legal access to the proposed project site, i ncluding right of
access without trespassing on adjacent property. Detail any third-party rights,
easements or other encumbrances that exist. Provide supporting documentation
proving ownership, legal access or perm ission from landowner and a site map in Part G.
(3 points)
The parcel of property located at 2101 West Oxford Avenue, Englewood, Colorado, is
located in the City of Sheridan. The City of Englewood is the sole owner of this parcel
and the adjacent parcel known a Broken Tee Golf Course. Vehicle access to the
RiverRun Trail head will be provided by the current entrance used by the Golf Course .
No third party rights, easements or other encumbrances will affect this project.
Arapahoe County parcel search ownership verification is located in Part G.
5. Describe long-term maintenance of the project site. Estimate the annual costs to
maintain the site, how those numbers were calculated, how you intend to fund
maintenance and who is responsible for maintenance. Explain how maintaining this
project site changes your agency maintenance budget. (Provide projected budget
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 16of44
changes, detailed cost estimates, how you plan to accommodate these changes, and
explain how you arrived at those numbers.) Provide a commitment letter from the
management/maintenance agency addressing long-term maintenance and include
budgeting for funding maintenance in Part G. (7 points)
The City of Englewood owns all park property and the Parks and Recreation Department
will be responsible for the long-term maintenance of every park including all
landscaping, structures, trails and playground equipment for the project . The City of
Englewood annually allocates funding in the Parks and Recreation Department budget
for personnel, commodities and capital for regular repair and maintenance for all park
infrastructures, amenities and facilities. The 2015 Parks Division Maintenance Budget is
$2,137,252. The Parks Department currently maintains approximately 250 acres of
parkland, open space and green space and infrastructure.
Phase I of this project will not require additional budgeting for funding maintenance
costs because this project consists mainly of earthwork. When the Trailhead is
completed with all listed amenities, it is expected that an additional $16,465 will be
added to the Parks Division Maintena!1Ce budget for labor, irrigation, restroom/shelter
maintenance, snow and trash rem~vaJ,.tr-~Ef~nd.;~'t!rf maintenance.
i~ '\:., '~
6. Summarize planning efforts tq ,date ·~nd i;~est~~'~;~ made prior to submitting a grant
proposal. Discuss pre-submittal"111e'etiogs, dates~rid outcomes. Be detailed and include
•
~ .. · } 11 ~ ·-'; -:,. :_··'/ -~
eligible pre-planning costs on t~~ ~at~tyBu..~g~r ~·~im in Part E. See application •
instructions for details. Proof ofpr~-~u6mittal · pJahning expenses must be submitted as
'·~,,.. i~I ;.·?·;· .. ,;:•
an attachment in Part G. All attacti'ments ... should be clearly labeled on the Part G cover
page. (5 points)
In 2011, the City of Englewood was awarded a $50,000 planning grant from Arapahoe
County Open Space with a total project cost of $134,600, for Riverside Park Planning.
Shortly following the grant award, the City of Englewood was contacted by Urban
Drainage Flood Control District (UDFCD). UOFCD had identified the river corridor from
Union Avenue to Oxford Avenue for potential improvements. As discussions unfolded
of related projects along the South Platte River, Riverside soon became RiverRun and
designated as the Trailhead of this project. This process prompted the re-establishment
of the South Platte Working Group. Partners of the South Platte Working Group include
the City of Englewood, City of Sheridan, City of Littleton, South Suburban Parks and
Recreation District, UDFCD, Colorado Water Conservation Board and Arapahoe County
Open Space.
In 2012, the planning grant was put on hold and a grant extension was awarded until
the South Platte Working Group could provide direction and long range plans for the
river corridor. The South Platte Working Group began meeting monthly to create a
vision for improvements along the river.
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 17of44 •
•
•
•
By 2013, the vision started to take shape and the City of Englewood contracted with
UDFCD to create the design of RiverRun Trailhead. UDFCD working with Mclaughlin
Whitewater Design Group and OHM Design will complete final design by May 2015,
currently with 75% of the design work completed and vetted through the South Platte
Working Group.
7. Is this project "shovel ready"? Provide evidence that this project will be completed
within two years. Is design and engineering complete or is there still work to be done?
List any permits that will need to be obtained for implementation of the project and
existing status of obtaining those permits. (Federal 404, County or City Planning or
Public Works, Storm Water Drainage, etc). Does the project necessitate a change in
zoning? Itemize anticipated costs for permits, government fees and consultants. Detail
costs in the correct Part E Budget Form. Correlate response with the Project Timeline in
Part D. Project timeline must be realistic to receive full points for this question. If this is
an acquisition project, list the due diligence items you already have available or will
pursue (such as purchase agreement, preliminary title work, appraisal, environmental
site assessment, survey, etc). Purchase agreement or option with seller and preliminary
title work should be secured and indu,decUn the application and attached in Part G.
Include detailed costs in Part E . .(~·l:u:iir}tst .-:. ,
~ . ~ •• •' T •
Mclaughlin Whitewater DesitM GroU:p,and DH1'4 De$ign are currently working on Final
• (:•.'..-",:" •• J. ;' 'l !t
Design. 75% design was complet~g hi ~Ligust f.Ol.q!1 ,tThe design team and the City of
Englewood have engaged the €ity of Sh~ridan :in r.e~iew of preliminary design drawings .
A contractor (Naranjo Civil Constrtictors) ha:s be~lselected through the Urban Drainage
and Flood Control District's Project Part.n~r~ Pfbgram. The project timeline presented in
Part D has been prepared with input from Naranjo. The Trailhead will be built as part of
the overall river corridor project-. -Constr.uction .of r.iver improvements will start in fall of
2015. Phase 1-Site Preparation will start in fall of 2015 and be completed by spring
2017.
Permits will be required to build the trailhead. The City and design team have
conducted a review meeting with the City of Sheridan. The following are permits that
are required:
• Access & Right-of-Way Permit -City of Sheridan
• Grading Permit -City of Sheridan
• Stormwater/Erosion Sediment Control -State of Colorado/City of Sheridan
• Building & Lighting-City of Sheridan
The City of Sheridan has requested that the Design Team wait to submit for permits to
build the project within 12 months prior to construction. Permit applications will be
completed at this time. No zoning changes are required .
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 18of44
8. Describe the planning process that identified this specific project as a priority. Is this
project listed as a priority in a master plan, site specific plan or other adopted planning
document? If so, discuss that plan. Describe the relationship of the project to any local,
regional, state or system-wide master plan. Give the name of each plan and list related
element(s) within the plan. Was this project identified through an independent
community planning process? Describe this process. (5 points)
Preserving open space and native areas, enhancing trail access, adding trail users and
creating recreational opportunities are the objectives of the RiverRun Trail head project.
In 2006, Englewood Parks and Recreation Master Plan supported acquisition and
development of open space and areas that improved or increased connection to the
Mary Carter Greenway Trail. The Master Plan further identified this property as an
opportunity to become a trailhead as well as meet the needs for additional outdoor
gathering spaces in the community plus offer an excellent opportunity to access the
South Platte River.
Englewood Parks and Recreation Department's pavilions are reserved over 82% of the
usable dates and large group requests typically are not accommodated due to the lack
of enough large picnic pavilions in~the area :. Thls J?roject will provide additional picnic
pavilion space and a playgrou'ld .a~ we~H a ~ sreate ~\dynamic access point to the South
Platte River. The water recre~ticinal ·oppqrtunit.ies\.yill be dramatically increased with
the paved ADA access to the riV,er.1.U~~r~:·can ob~e~~~ wildlife, fish, wade, swim and
kayak in an area that has seen !ittle __ ,_us1~.yTpi~ lpc~tjon with restroom and parking
facilities will accommodate the IT!~·PX~M 'ary C~rt~f, Greenway Trail users .
. "
In 2011, Arapahoe County Open Space awarded a $50,000 planning grant recognizing
the need for the future d~yelopment of this ~sit.e.. Planning for the Trailhead became the
focus of the South Platte Working Group as they developed the vision of the South
Platte River corridor. With the planning grant completed in 2014, the trailhead project is
ready to begin .
9. Discuss any efforts to obtain public input1 disseminate public information, develop
partnerships, develop partnerships for cash finding or in-kind contributions, and garner
community support specifically related to this project. In most cases, evidence of a
transparent public process will be required. For acquisitions, the process may be tied to
a public process for an overall master plan rather than identification of a specific parcel.
For regional trails, the process may need to include notification and/or involvement of
residents from adjacent jurisdictions. Discuss any objections or opposition to this
project. Include any letters, petitions, news articles, or other documents evidencing
opposition. What has been done to address concerns and how has the opposition
responded? (5 points)
In 2013, the South Platte Working Group was re-established during a visioning charrette
for the South Platte River which included local municipalities, special interest groups,
community leaders, property owners and other stakeholders. The South Platte Working
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 19 of44
•
•
•
•
•
•
Group recommitted to preserving and protecting the river corridor as a community
asset and to enhance the quality of life in Arapahoe County through the ongoing
collaborative process to enhance the natural environment, economic benefits and
recreational features of the South Platte River. The South Platte Working Group
members agreed that the river downstream of Oxford Avenue provided recreational
and economic benefits for the entire region and this area was identified as the trailhead.
Urban Drainage Flood Control District began managing the Trailhead and river projects.
Preliminary designs were created and presented to the South Platte Working Group.
With revisions completed, the public process was established by first taking the designs
to local jurisdictions and governing boards to determine financial support for the
projects. Elected officials knowing their communities and their needs provided
feedback that helped shape the current design of the project.
Receiving financial commitments and positive support for the project, Urban Drainage
Flood Control District began additional public outreach by attending community events
such as Sheridan's National Night out and Englewood's FunFest. Most common public
comments have been "when will it ~e buil_t?'.,'.,.
._ ... -~ ::.'~
·, .c·<,·, __ \
A public open house was held .()fl N~~e?1~~f 12,.~Q~4 at the Broken Tee Golf Course
giving an opportunity for the pu~l!.c·tR.8~Ifl ' mo~~'i.?tfprmation about the RiverRun
Trail head and project as well a~,.p~9v\(le f eedba9<·:};?ver 30 business owners, community
leaders and public attended th~.pp~n lh cj 1.1s,_!:'., A!fa.~ending shared positive feedback and
support about this project. · ·~ ' · <)'
A website (www.southplatteriverrun.com) has been launched to continue providing the
public information, updates i3r:td gain fe.ed.back.fr:c>.rn th.e. community.
Currently, we have received no objections or opposition toward this proposed project
throughout the entire process.
10. Describe how this project addresses inclusivity per the Americans with Disabilities Act
guidelines. (3 points)
RiverRun Trail head will be constructed using the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible
Design. The following elements have incorporated into the design throughout the area
and comply with a fully accessible ADA park.
• Remove all barriers to access
• Provide an accessible route of travel and accessible route of travel to the play
equipment
• Provide a range of accessible equipment and play equipment
• Provide an accessible surface beneath all accessible equipment
• Half of all elevated play components on a play structure will be accessible by route
and/or transfer point. 2015
Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 20of44
The development of RiverRun Trail head will provide the following park amenities: ADA
access to existing and proposed regional trails through the plaza and other additional
points, ADA paved access to the riverside, ADA accessible pavilion with 200-250 person
capacity and ADA picnic tables, Increase parking capacity -199 parking stalls including 4
ADA accessible stalls (1. 75/acre), ADA accessible playground with a natural play theme,
ADA accessible restroom and Landscaping with irrigation.
11. Discuss the need and urgency for this project and why it is a priority. What opportunities
are lost if this project is not funded now? (5 points)
The RiverRun Trailhead and trail project along the South Platte River corridor is a
regional project guided by the members of the South Platte Working Group. Partners of
the South Platte Working Group include the City of Englewood, City of Sheridan, City of
Littleton, South Suburban Parks and Recreation District, Urban Drainage Flood Control
District, Colorado Water Conservation Board and Arapahoe County Open Space. Each of
these members has committed funding resources to this project. Funding from all
sources is contingent upon ACOS grant func;ling. In the absence of grant funding, the
Trailhead and trail project will lose .pri?'rjty$tattis among the funding partners, matching
funds may be diverted to other p-roje~s and 'this project may not be completed for
several years. · -·• __ ;/' · ; · : '1 i
1 ~. ) • r Ii
•
. c . ; i -~ .J ::-1 J
12. If successful in obtaining this grant, .hoyv}W.i.IJ t~e agency use this project to inform •
citizens about the value of the Aq1p'ahoe -Cc:>'unty'epen Space sales and use tax? Address
• • .• . ·~ _,I"
the public outreach plan, signage plan, c~J~bration, dedication, etc. (2 points)
Temporary signage announcing-the constr:uction.pr:oject will be installed along Oxford
Avenue and within the current parking area. The signage will identify all funding
partners including ACOS for the project and list the project timeline. Permanent signage
identifying ACOS support and funding will be installed at the main entrance to the
Trail head once the project has been completed.
Information will also be added to the City of Englewood's website identifying the project
and funding sources during and following construction. The Englewood Herald will run
information and a news stories throughout the project. Social Media such as Facebook
and Twitter will be used to provide project updates, recognize accomplishments and
promote funding partners.
A celebration will be scheduled at the completion of the Trailhead project as a way to
recognize the partnerships, funding agents, citizens, county and local dignitaries that
helped make this project happen.
13. How much of your planned cash match is secured? How much still needs to be raised
and what are your plans for raising additional funds? What is your back up plan if you
are unable to raise those funds? Describe the cash and in-kind partnerships established •
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 21of44
•
•
for this project. This does not include partners who have contributed to previous
phases or partners that plan to contribute to future phases. Explain if partnerships were
not possible or necessary for this project. Include all partner support letters in Part G
and clearly label on the section cover page. Include match from all partners in the Part E
Budget. All support letters must be dated within the last six months to be eligible.
(5 points)
The City of Englewood is in support of funding the RiverRun Trail head and trail project.
This partnered project between the cities of Englewood, Sheridan, South Suburban
Parks and Recreation District, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District and the
Colorado Water and Conservation Board is an exciting opportunity to improve
recreation and economic development along the South Platte Corridor. Urban Drainage
and Flood Control District has contributed $551,000 towards the RiverRun Project as
noted in the attached partner commitment letter Part G.
The City of Englewood has committed $100,000 as the cash match for Phase t of this
construction project. The cash match is secure and budgeted using Conservation Trust
Funds and Arapahoe County Shareb~ck Ft:mds. Funds have been budgeted for
construction of the RiverRun Tra.illie-ad 'in the C itv:s Five-Year Capital Master Plan.
·~ ~ ~~
;: .,. .. ' . . ,-">-,,t .:·f'--"\ ::\ : .. ,_
14. Briefly discuss support from e~tltiE!s ·aQd {us'er gi;ou'ps that are supporting the project in
other ways than cash or in-ki~~.t<?!·;rtijip~fions . ,,Sup1~brt letters should come from users, ' .• • .. , ' ..... ' ' 4
user groups, community mem~~fs,,yo,lu i;tt~~r~; scp'p ols, etc. A maximum offive (5)
support letters should be attach~c:(ln 1 Pa"'r:t 6 .a,ry ~',~l~arly labeled on the section cover
page . All letters should be dated wit ~ir:i tJl~Jcist's ix months. (5 points)
Overwhelming support fgrth.e Riv.er.Ru.n .I r:ailhe_act !i_r.t.d -trail project throughout the
region is provided by the South Platte Working Group members and the communities
they represent. Agencies and businesses providing support letters have indicated the
primary reasons as being enhancement to an underutilized area, providing river access,
and numerous recreational opportunities that will be provided to the cities of
Englewood, Sheridan, and Littl eton as well as all Arapahoe County residents as a
regional attraction .
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 22of44
Certification of accuracy for the Information provided In Part F:
Applicant certifies that all of the above answers are accurate and that all information submitted
Is true to the best of their knowledge.
~~ Authorized Signature:-
(must be signed by high~
Print Name and Title: ::I&M-44 lt4.e<'=
.l.~~ r1r ~.......,.&,_>..~
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 23 of 44
Date: /-r e<C
•
•
•
Part G-Attachments (10 points)
Use this as the table of contents cover page for the required application attachments.
Attachments in this section are supporting documentation to the questions answered in Part F.
To receive the full amount of points available for each question, sufficient supporting
documentation must be attached. List all attachments in order, by name/title and by page
number.
1. Evidence of support from highest authority (official letter or resolution**) -
including commitment to complete the project; statement that match funds are
secured; and certification that the project will be open to the public or serve a
public purpose upon completion
2. Evidence of commitment to long-term maintenance (official letter or resolution)
3. Evidence of property ownership/legal access (legal documentation)
4. Evidence of community support (letters of support -max. 5, known objections)
5. Documentation of oppostition and responses (if applicable)
6. Evidence of commitment from funding partners (cash match/in-kind match
support letters)
7. Photos (pre-submittal)
8. Site maps (project locati~n maps)_ ·,
r ··~
9. GIS shapefile, if applicab[e OnJ:ILide o,n compact disc)
10. Other (clearly title: acquisition do~umentatlon, if applicable, or other supporting
documents) ",; ,.. .~, 1i , «;'
; '·. /' .... __ . .
**Resolution from a Governing Body or.~h ·Offi~fal L.~tt:e'r from Highest Authority must include
all listed applicable items and must designate a specific person to sign the grant agreement and
related grant administration documents.**
• 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 24 of 44
Part G Attachments-!. Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. IL_
SERIES OF 2015
A RESOLUTION AUTIIORIZING TIIE CITY'S ARAPAHOE COUNTY OPEN SPACE
GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RIVERRUN TRAILHEAD
PHASE I
WHEREAS, Council authorized the application and acceptance of the Riverside Park planning
grant in 2011 and in 2014 Council authorized an Intergovernmental agreement with Urban
Drainage and Flood Control District to complete the design of the site; and
WHEREAS, Urban Drainage Flood Control District (UDFCD) is managing the river corridor
project in partnership with the City of Englewood, City of Sheridan, South Suburban Parks and
Recreation District. Colorado Water Conservation Board and Arapahoe County Open Space as
part of the South Platte Working Group; and
WHEREAS, The South Platte Working Group members agreed that the river downstream of
Oxford A venue provided recreation and economic benefits for the entire region and this area was
identified as RiverRun Trailhead; and
WHEREAS, the RiverRun Trailhead is a construction project along the South Platte River at
Ox.ford Avenue and is destined to become a major focal point for bikers using the Mary Carter
Greenway Trail as well as river enthusiasts enjoying kayaking and fishing; and
WHEREAS, these Trailhead amenities will include a large park pavilion, playground,
restroom facilities, and ADA access to the South Platte River and regional trails; and
WHEREAS, the RiverRun Trailhead will be completed in multiple phases. Phase I -Site
Preparation will include removal of existing improvements, erosion and sediment control,
construction surveying, earthwork and stormwater facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Trailhead will be located on property owned by the City of Englewood next
to the Broken Tee Golf Course which is located in the City of Sheridan; and
WHEREAS, there are no federal funds being used for the RiverRun Trailhead Phase I; and
WHEREAS, the City's Arapahoe County Open Space grant application \vill request $300,000
in grant funds with a required City cash match of $100,000 which has been budgeted; and
WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation will bring back an IGA if approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authorizes the
attached application for an Arapahoe County Open Space Grant for the construction of the River
Run Trailhead Phase 1. Attached hereto as Exhibit A.
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 25 of 44
•
•
•
•
•
•
ADOPTED AND APPROVE
I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk for,tjie City of Englewood. Co
above is a bUe copy of Resolution No. le__, Series of201 .
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 26of44
1i · .
Part G Attachments-2. long-Term Maintenance
{' c T y 0 F ENGLEWOOD
DEPA~TMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Arapahoe County Open Space and Tntils Advisory Board
6934 South Lima Street, Unit A
Centennial, CO 801U
December 1, 2014
Re : Long-Term Park Maintenance
Dear Open Sp~? Advisory Board,
The City of Englewood Parks and Recreation Department is committed to the long-tenn maintenance
and management of all Englewood parks and park Infrastructure within the City. The Oty of Englewood
allocates funds for the long-term maintenance, repair and replacement or park infrastructure. Ongolna
maintenance functions Include: trash pickup, 11raffiti removal, periodic playground equipment Inspection
and repairs, restroom and picnic pavilion cleanina, turf maintenance and mowing, trail and sidewalk
maintenance, tree, shrub and landscaping maintenance, lighting and plumbina malntem1nce and repillr.
The Parks and Recreation Department Is funded annually throu11h the City of Engl1wood's General Fund
as part of the core seNlces provided to the dtlzens of the Cty of Enalewood. River Run Trallheed Is
currently Included In all Iona-term maintenance proarams and activities and will continue to be a part of
all such activities into the future.
Parts and Reaeatlon DI rector
1155 W. Oxford Avenue Englewood, Colorado 60110 Phone 303-762-2660 Fax 303 -762·2688
www.onglewoodgov.ma
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 27 of44
•
•
•
•
•
•
Part G Attachments -3. -Evidence of property ownership
'.flr1'81l .,._::....._-:._. ,,., ... t. -. '-~:---1 --; ·y·.--~.-.......,~-~-;~""il ' ::--:'"~"'!-,.. ~ :-;-,..-~-·r ·--~-=-~·~...-:-.7·, -!·~·-r:··-o: .....,_~ ····i:i.. '<--.-•
fi fJl'.~tG2 @~~lJ~!d!.:: • !.!J.~..iC~J~H t; ,9 1.1.~~.;; ... ~~~-..!.x..:i.""'""z"'"'~~~·~,,_,,...,:,..r.:.~.;,;;.-c-...i....,~;
__ .J. I
::-\ .
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 28 of 44
RiverRun in Sheridan
PIN 034835504
Arapahoe Counly -Pnrcel Search Page 1of1
PIN:
AIN:
Situs Addreu:
Situs City:
Full Owner List:
Owner Address:
Clty/StatefZlp:
Neighborhood:
Neighborhood Code :
Acreage:
Land UH:
Legal Desc:
2014 ApptalJtld Value
2'l t 4 A"81"tld Value
034835504
2077-04-3-0()..()71
Englewood Ctty Of
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
Englewood Ind Area
3537.00
0.0000
That Part or The Sw 114 Sec 4-5-88 Desc As Beg Af. The Nw Cor Of Sd Sw 1/4 Th E 1945 Ft MIL
Th Sw 141.15 Ft & 46 .09 Ft Th Se 71.81 Ft Th Sw 94.85 FITh Se 104 .93 Fl Th 5w73 .39 FITh S
78.85Ft&135.36 Fl Th Sw440.93 Ft Th W57.93FlThs1n.e1FtThw1949.3 Fl To A Pl On
The W Line or Sd Nw 1/4 Th N To Beg Sec 4-5-68
Total
680,727
197,411
Building
411,677
119,386
2013 Miii Levy:
Land
269,050
78,025
80 .767
Land Urie Units Land Value Land Use
1.0000 LT 300 Open Space
Nole Land Line di ta llbov• camtspond.S ID the lnllia/ appraiSed l/ll/ue and does nol ~flld stibtequenl lfPl»IJ 19lated ad/Usbnenlll, If any .
• Nol all paicels hawe l!Vllllable photos / s~lehes.
In some cases 11 sketch may be dlfl!Qilt lo 1111d. Please cauct Ill• Assusan Otlica for assh1lance. Mea&Urelllenb taken lram the exterior or lhe bulld
The Arapahoe Ccunly A&sessors Office does nol warranty lie accuracy of mlY lketch , nor wuma any rwsponlllblllty or llihU lty lo any user .
Allhotlgh soma pen:els may have multiple bull~ and photos, al this lime our system I& llmlted to 1 sketch and 1 pl1oto ptr pan:el number . Sony for .
lncanvenl1111:e .
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 29of44
•
•
•
•
•
Part G -Attachments 4. Support Letters
c ~' T y 0 F ENGLEWOOD
PARK$ AND R~c;~EATION (:OMMISSION
Jlllluary 8, 2015
Arapilhoe Coonty Open Sp:ice Grant Program
6934 S. Uma St. Unit A
Centennial, Colorado 80112
Advisory Boo.rd Members:
I am writing this lctlcr of aippon on behalf of the Englewood Parks ll1ld Recreation Commission in
support of the Englewood Parks and Rccrealion Department's grant application for die RiverRun
Trail head.
The RivCIRun Tmilbcad nlong thci South Ploltc River will not only become a rcm:alionnl
destination for the entire region, bul will olso improve and reslore the river and its habilats. This
recrea1ional area along the South Platte River will be enjoyed by bicyclists. byakers, rashers and
the general public. The trailhead will also be ADA ac=ssible so that everyone can enjoy the
amenities. The shelter, resarooms, and playground areas will be a draw for any outdoor enthusiast.
The Comrnissk>n ls supporting lhis grant application because thls development along the river will
cnlulnce the image of the City of Engr~wood within our own comnunity 1111d beyond. This
additi<ln will substantiate the City of Englewood's dedication 10 its parts and lhe environment.
Thank you for your consideration or che RiverRun Trailhead for Englewood's J>atks and Recn:ationi
DepllltmenL
Sin=:rc-cerely,
...--I •
-~ .
II 1
r.1.as Otureu CTJ''
Englewood Parks ond Reaealioo Commission
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 30 of 44
December 4, 2014
City of Sheridan
4101 S. Federal Blvd.
Sheridan, CO 80110-5399
J0Jn62-2200
FAX 303nB8-1853
Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Proi:ram
6934 S. Lima St. Unit A
Centennial, Colorado 80112
Dear Board Members,
I om writing this letter of support for the Enslewood Departmt.'llt or Pad. and Rccn:ation 's
application for funds £or the RivcrRun Trailhcad.
The City of Sheridan is partnering with the City of Englewood and other organizations to provide
this cohanccment to the South Platte River Corridor. This trailhcad will provide the citizens of
Sheridan, Englewood, Littleton and South Metro Denver a place to lish, kayak. swim and enjoy
nature. The shelter, restrooms and playground will provide an aesthetic place for bikers to rest and
the general public to take in the natural surroundings. This uailhcad will be an improvement to the
land that is owned by the City of Englewood, but is located within the City of Sheridan. This tract
of land is currently not being utilized and will make Sheridan and the colin: South Metro area a
desirable place lo live and visit.
Thonlc you for your consideration of the RiverRun Trailhead for Englewood's Parks and Recreation
Department.
Devin Gmnbery
City Manager
City of Sheridan
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 31of44
www.cl.sherldan.co .us
•
•
•
•
•
•
(YrtORD" (l
~~~~~~A~~·
Ea&)ewood, co 80110-4340
303-762-1160 • Fax 303-762-1746 • www.oxfonfn:cycllng.com
Dec.ember 17, 2014
Arapahoe County Opea Space Grant Program
6934 S. Lima St Uait A
Cemenaial, Colorado 80112
Car Arapahoe County Open Spaea Advisors,
I am writing on behalf of Oxford Recycling In S\JPPOl't of tht ;rant application for the RiverRml
Trailhead alona the SoUlh Platac IUva-.
The trail.brad, shelter and playground that will be a part of the Tmlhead will improve the area md
make ft a destination spot. Being located nar the Trallhead location, Oxford R=ycliag is excited
to have a nice outdoor pW:e for our employees to relzt or perhaps barbeque after work with 1heir
families or coworbrs. A1ly impt0vemeats to 1be ana near tbs South Platte River will be
appreciated by all ofu.s who wmtc and live neuby •
Ploase coasiderawarding the City ofEnglewood grant fimds for the Riverlbm Tnlilhead.
Thlmkyou,
John Kent
Oxford Rcc:.ycling
2400 W. Oxford Ave.
Englewood. co 80110
....
'-'Reduce
RecydinC'I AspbAJt -CoacrllfA -Wood
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 32of44
...,,
'-'Reuse ('j Recycle
SuppJJiag: Recycled ~ ·Road Bate -CinlYel -.Docormva Rock· Mukh
""""· WUTll IUIANMllMllNT
December 29, 2014
Arapahoe County Open Space ~rant ?rogram
6934 S. Lima St. Unit A
Centennial, Colorado 80112
Dear Board Members,
WASTe MANAGl!MIHT
5500 S. Quebec SL Suite 250
Greenwood VUla99, CO 80111
I am wr1Ung lhls letter In support on behalf of Waste Management for Ille grant application for the RJverRun
Trailhead along the South Platte River.
As a business located near the RiverRun Trailhead, we fully support the improvements and enhancements
that will be made to the location adjacent lo the South Platte River.
The !railhead, shelter and playground will improve the area and the perception of Englewood as a whole.
We encourage improvemenls to all nearby areas in Englewood, especially those that encourage
environmental sustainability and outdoor recreation.
Thank you for your consideration of the RiverRun Trailhead for Englewood's Parks and Recreation
Department
~&~-
Scott Hutchings ~
Manager of Public Affairs
Waste Management Four Comers Area
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 33of44
•
•
•
•
•
•
Part G -Attachments 5. Documentation of Opposition and Responses
No opposition, letter:sot respo(lses to include
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 34 of 44
.. •"
. ~ -
!.i •'
Part G -Attachments 6. Partner Commitment
URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PW A. Hindman, EJ!ecutive Director
2480 W. 26th Avenue. Suite 1568
Denver, co 80211 ·5304
December 17,2014
Arapahoe County Open Space Grant Program
6934 S. Lima St. Unit A
Centennial, Colorado 80 I I 2
Dear Arapahoe County Open Space :
Telephone 300·455 -6277
Fax 300·455 ·7880
www.udfcd.org
Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) is committed to the City of Englewood's
River Run Truilhead. UDFCD, the Cities of Englewood and Sheridan, South Suburban Parks Md
Recreation District. and the Colorado Water and Conscrwtion Board have partnered with Arapahoe
County Open Space to continue the South Platte Working Group.
Last year, the working group conducted a visioning charrette that brought major stakeholders
together lo map out oppor1unities for impro,,·cment along the South Platte River. Tbe outcome
demonstrated the imponam:e of the improvements included in the River Run Pnrk Project that goes
from Oxford lo Union along the South Platte River.
The goals of River Run Park are to increase the R:gional trail connectivity and capacity, enhance the
river ecosystem, and provide river access and in-river recreation while maintaining the I 00-year
conveyance . The River Run Trailhead is a key component of the project as it provides unique
amenities not found along the river thal will attract more users lo the area . These amenities include;
parking, large picnic pavilion, restrooms, water refill and a natural play area for kids. Without the
trail head the full potential of other improvements will not be realized.
The River Run Park Project is an outstanding example of leveraging resources and agencies
working together to provide the greatest benefit to the community. UDFCD is proud to be part of
this project and is committed to the restoration of the natura~ beneficial functions of the Ooodplain
and river. UDFCD has olre11dy contributed SSS 1,000 to the River Run Park Project.
P11ul A. Hindman
Executive Director
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 35of44
•
•
•
•
•
•
Part G -Attachments 7. Photos
Existing Cond itions-RiverRun Traifhead view north-Mary Carter Greenway Trail Bridge
Existing Conditions-View south-East Bank of River
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 36 of 44
Existing Conditions-View south-East Bank of River
Exisiting Conditions-RiverRun Trailhead view north-future site ofTrailhead
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 37of44
•
•
•
•
•
• 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 38 of44
OHM Design-View north of river access and Trail head
2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 39 of 44
OHM Design-View east of playground
•
•
•
•
•
• 2015 Standard/Small Grant Application
Page 40 of 44
Part u-Attachments 8. Site Mans
2015 Standard/Smiill t;raiifAiilllkotinn P•oP 41-nTM • •
City of Englewood, Colorado
2015 Arapahoe County
Open Space, Parks, and Trails
Grant Application
River Run Trailhead
Site Plan Map
December 2014
{'
Not to Scale
•
• • •
City of Englewood, Colorado
2015 Arapahoe County
Open Space, Parks, and Trails
Grant Application
River Run Trailhead
Street Map
LEGEND
-Pedestrian/Bicycle Trails
December 2014
{'
9
0 800 1,600 2,400
~ iii
"' " I
·-1 ~ ' ·· ' ---lJEl · · ~ 'f;---i l City of Englewood, Colorado I
\-
{f J
I
COLUMBINE <
i
{ -'
VAL!.l!EY•'
I
.... i t. ,·I
'.
1
/
11
•
1----1 ----· :
A liJ R 'ORA --~ . . +-··-t-.
\. l :
YALE AVE -_;___ -1
DARTMOUTH AVE ,
HAMPDENAVe
I
I !---I
CHERRY HILLS OUINCYAVIE ····--,, ---------~ ···---l
VILLAGE I )
I __ _,,~{',, I . _Te~h
DI! BELLEVIEW AVIE <;:enter --n
~r· • · r'>...i.------+-------·-·-°" ~ ~ ).. I. ' §! ! • • ... .._
.. --~ \ ti ;I GREENWOOD ::;' :.! l., ----·1 I I i ~ . ~~ ~l >-' (.J r-~, · .. VILLAGE :Ji ffi·--1 \J 1 1 1 ,
., ml £ ,, 1 \_'>( ~ ~ -~. I 0 ,r :r:1 l l r .,; 1
1 J ~ :::> .-·--·~ --. ORCHARDRD • .., ,, J ' ' ... ,.,._, ___ J_ .......... ' -L.---~-----1--.-----__ J_ ---<··1
, ,j ··', ! -' \_~I >' f:.
' ' 1 ' '. r· i 1
t -j_., ' --·~ ... --~ LI_ t 1 ···_,,.,,,,,. I ( I I , ,
' • ' I ·;:i · I
LITTLETON _• i., ARAPAHOERD ' •r . -·l·, --/. -
,""1 ' : ! . -. ! •. ----Lr--_ ·--+· ··1~ .... ,..,-... _·.~..,. f I Jr~r. \
I ! ' .. I
CENTENNIAL U
J.
VRr CRF.EK RD ~~·~\!
l I
..... t -1
I
I.
HIGHLANDS RANCH
•
I
2015 Arapahoe County
Open Space, Parks, and Trails
Grant Application
River Run Trailhead
Vicinity Map
December 2014
{'
9
0 1 2 3
Miles
•
•
•
•
Part G-Attachments 9. GIS Shapefile
Included/Submitted in Part G. Attachment 3-Evidence of Property Ownership
2015 Standard/Smal l Grant Application
Page 44 of 44
Page 28
Also included on CD
Date:
June 15, 2015
Initiated By:
Agenda Item:
9 c i
Department of Public Works
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Subject:
Award Contract for Concrete Utility 2015
Staff Source:
Larry Nimmo, Field Operations Administrator
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
• On May 5, 1997, City Council approved Ordinance No. 36, Series 1997 creating a Concrete Utility
and Concrete Utility Enterprise Fund (EMC Chapter 8, Title 12).
• Council has approved annual construction contracts for removal and replacement of substandard
concrete.
• Staff discussed the Concrete Utility project at the Study Session on June 1, 2015.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends Council award by motion the 2015 Concrete Utility program. The total estimated
construction cost ($615,565.75) consists of a construction contract with NORAA Concrete Construction in
the amount of $565,565.75, and a construction contingency in the amount of $50,000.00 .
• BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
The Englewood Municipal Code (Section 11-3B-1) requires property owners to maintain the concrete curbs,
gutters, and sidewalks adjacent to their property. An option available to property owners is to participate in
the Concrete Utility. The Concrete Utility provides a funding mechanism for concrete repair at a reasonable
cost ($8.15 to $10.00 quarterly fee for a typical residential property) and a convenient way to pay (96% of
the fees are collected through the water/sewer billing system). The City contributes its share of the fees just
like any private owner.
Staff prepared bid documents and quantity estimates for the 2015 Concrete Utility work, installation or repair
of four RTD bus pads (supplemental funding from RTD IGA, and Road and Bridge), and repair work
requested by the Utilities department. The project was publicly advertised in April and bids were opened on
May 13, 201 5. NORAA Concrete Construction submitted the lowest responsive bid. NORAA Concrete
Construction successfully completed the last three years of the Concrete Utility program with exceptional
performance.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
One bid was received and opened on May 13, 2015 as detailed in the attached Bid Tabulation. The bid
submitted by NORAA Concrete Construction is 2.3 % higher than the Engineer's Estimate of $553,000 .
•
Estimated Construction costs for the 2015 project are as follows:
Construction contract (NORAA Concrete Construction)
Contingency for unidentified work
Total Estimated 201 5 Construction Cost
Funding sources:
Concrete Utility (Includes $50,000 Contingency)
RTD Bus Pad (Grant per IGA with RTD)
Road and Bridge Account (Pavement Rehab, Walk & Infill)
Utilities Department (Requested work)
Total 2015 Available Funding
LIST OF AITACHMENTS
Bid Tabulation
Contract
$565,565.75
$ 50,000.00
$615,565.75
$533,490.75
$ 35,000.00
$ 32,075.00
$ 15,000.00
$615,565.75
•
•
•
•
City of Englewood Bid Tabulation Sheet
Bid Opening Date: May 13, 2015 2:00 P.M. MDT
ITEM BID: ITB-15-003 Concrete Utility 2015 Project
Bid Bond
Vendor Y/N SOQ Y/N
Noraa Concrete Construction Corp.
39673 E 160th Ave
Keenesburg, CO 80643
Lori Kaiser, Secretary/Treasurer
303-637-9233 y y
• •
I Apparent Low Bidder · 1
Kec1ept or
Addendum 1
Y/N Total Bid Exceptions:
y $ 565,565.75
CONTRACT #CFC/15-36
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
erHIS CONTRACT and agreement, made and entered into this 1.§ day of June. 201.§, by and between the City
of Englewood, a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado hereinafter referred to as the "City", and
NORAA Concrete Construction Corporation, whose address is 39673 E. 160th Avenue. Keenesburg, CO
80673, ("Contractor''), commencing on the 21 51 day of April , 201.§, and continuing for at least ten (10) days
thereafter the City advertised that sealed proposals would be received for furnishing all labor, tools, supplies,
equipment, materials and everything necessary and required for the following:
PROJECT: 2015 Concrete Utility Project
WHEREAS, proposals pursuant to said advertisement have been received by the Mayor and City Council and
have been certified by the Director of Public Works to the Mayor and City Council with a recommendation that
a contract for work be awarded to the above named Contractor who was the lowest reliable and responsible
bidder therefore, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said recommendation, the Contract has been awarded to the above named Contractor
by the Mayor and City Council and said Contractor is now willing and able to perform all of said work in
accordance with said advertisement and his proposal.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the compensation to be paid and the work to be performed under this
contract, the parties mutually agree as follows:
•
A. Contract Documents : It is agreed by the parties hereto that the following list of instruments,
drawings and documents which are attached or incorporated by reference constitute and shall be
referred to either as the Contract Documents or the Contract and all of said instruments, drawings,
and documents taken together as a whole constitute the Contract between the parties hereto and
they are as fully a part of this agreement as if they were set out verbatim and in full :
Invitation to Bid
Contract (this instrumef1t)
Special Provisions
Insurance
Performance Payment Maintenance Bond
Section 1 -General Information
Section 2 -Special Provisions
Section 3 -General Conditions
Section 4 -Portland Cement Concrete
Section 5 -Placing and Finishing Concrete
Section 6 -Site Preparation
Section 7 -Base Course
Section 8 -City of Englewood Construction Details
B . Scope of Work: The Contractor agrees to and shall furnish all labor, tools, supplies, equipment,
materials and everything necessary for and required to do, perform and complete all the work
described, drawn, set forth, shown and included in said Contract Documents.
C. Terms of Performance: The Contractor agrees to undertake the performance of the work under this
Contract within ten (10) days from being notified to commence work by the Director of Public Works,
TBD based on agreed schedule, and agrees to fully complete said work by October 15, 2015, plus
~ 1000 Englewood Parkway, Englewood, Colorado 80110 Phone
www.englewoodgov.org
1
(303) 762-2412 Fax (303) 783-6951
such extension or extensions of time as may be granted by the Director of Public Works in
accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents and Specifications .
D. Indemnification: The city cannot and by this AgreemenUContract does not agree to indemnify, •
hold harmless, exonerate or assume the defense of the Contractor or any other person or entity, for
any purpose. The Contractor shall defend, indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, agents
and employees from any and all claims, demands, suits, actions or proceedings of any kind or nature
including Worker's Compensation claims, in any way resulting from or arising out of this
Agreement/Contract: provided, however, that the Contractor need not indemnify or save harmless the
City, its officers, agents and employees from damages resulting from the sole negligence of the City's
officers, agents and Employees .
E. Termination of Award for Convenience: The City may terminate the award at any time by giving
written notice to the Contractor of such termination and specifying the effective date of such termination,
at least thirty (30) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event all finished or
unfinished service, reports, material (s) prepared or furnished by the Contractor after the award shall, at
the option of the City, become its property. If the award is terminated by the City as provided herein, the
Contractor will be paid that amount which bears the same ratio to the total compensation as the
services actually performed or material furnished bear to the total services/materials the successful firm
agreed to perform under this award, less payments of compensation previously made. If the award is
terminated due to the fault of the Contractor the clause relating to termination of the award for cause
shall apply.
F. Termination of Award for Cause: If, through any cause, the Contractor shall fail to fulfill in a timely and
proper manner its obligations or if the Contractor shall violate any of the covenants, agreements or
stipulations of the award, the City shall have the right to terminate the award by giving written notice to
the Contractor of such termination and specifying the effective date of termination . In that event, all
furnished or unfinished services, at the option of the City, become its property, and the Contractor shall
be entitled to receive just, equitable compensation for any satisfactory work documents, prepared •
completed or materials as furnished .
Notwithstanding the above, the Contractor shall not be relieved of the liability to the City for
damages sustained by the City by virtue of breach of the award by the Contractor and the
City may withhold any payments to the Contractor for the purpose of set off until such time
as the exact amount of damages due the City from the Contractor is determined .
G. Terms of Payment: The City agrees to pay the Contractor for the performance of all the work
required under this contract, and the Contractor agrees to accept as his full and only compensation
therefore, such sum or sums of money as may be proper in accordance with the price or prices set
forth in the Contractor's proposal attached and made a part hereof, the total estimated cost
thereof being Five Hundred Sixty-Five Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Five Dollars and Seventy-Five
Cents ($ 565.565.75). A 5% retainage of the awarded project amount will be withheld until final
inspection and acceptance by the Project Manager.
H . Aoorooriation of Funds: At present, $ 565,565,75 has been appropriated for the project.
Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, the parties understand and
acknowledge that each party is subject to Article X, § 20 of the Colorado Constitution ("TABOR").
The parties do not intend to violate the terms and requirements of TABOR by the execution of this
Agreement. It is understood and agreed that this Agreement does not create a multi-fiscal year
direct or indirect debt or obligation within the meaning of TABOR and, notwithstanding anything in
1000 Englewood Parkway, Englewood, Colorado 80110 Phone (303) 762-2412 Fax (303) 783-6951
www.englewoodgov.org
2 •
•
•
I.
this AgreemenUContract to the contrary, all payment obligations of the City are expressly dependent
and conditioned upon the continuing availability of funds beyond the term of the City's current fiscal
period ending upon the next succeeding December 31. Financial obligations of the City payable
after the current fiscal year are contingent upon funds for that purpose being appropriated, budgeted,
and otherwise made available in accordance with the rules, regulations, and resolutions of the City
and applicable law. Upon the failure to appropriate such funds, this Agreement shall be deemed
terminated. The City shall immediately notify the Contractor or its assignee of such occurrence in
the event of such termination.
Liquidated Damages: The City and Contractor recognize that time is of the essence in this
Agreement because of the public interest in health and safety, and that the City will suffer financial
loss, and inconvenience, if the Work is not complete within the time specified in the bid documents,
plus any extensions thereof allowed in accordance with the General Conditions. They also
recognize the delays, expense and difficulties involved in proving, in a legal proceeding, the actual
loss suffered by the City if the Work is not complete on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any
such proof, the City and Contractor agree that as liquidated damages for delay, but not as a penalty,
Contractor shall pay the City $250.00 for each day that expires after the time specified for substantial
completion until the Work is complete, and $250.00 for each day that expires after the time specified
for final completion until the Work is finally complete.
J. Assignment: Contractor shall not, at any time, assign any interest in this Agreement or the other
Contract Documents to any person or entity without the prior written consent of the City specifically
including, but without limitation, moneys that may become due and moneys that are due may not be
assigned without such consent (except to the extent that the effect of this restriction may be limited
by law). Any attempted assignment which is not in compliance with the terms hereof shall be null
and void. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an Assignment, no
Assignment will release or discharge the Assignor from any duty or responsibility under the Contract
Documents .
K. Contract Binding: It is agreed that this Contract shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the
parties hereto, their heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors .
L. State Statute: If this project is for a public works project or public project, as defined in Section 8-49-
102(2) C.R.S. the contractor shall comply with 8-17-101 C.R.S. which requires the contractor to use at
least eighty percent (80%) Colorado labor for any public works project financed in a whole or in part by
State, counties, school districts, or municipal monies.
M. Contractors Guarantee : The Contractor shall guarantee that work and associated incidentals shall
remain in good order and repair for a period of two (2) years from all causes arising from defective
workmanship and materials , and to make all repairs arising from said causes during such period
without further compensation. The determination of the necessity for the repair or replacement of said
project, and associated incidentals or any portion thereof, shall rest entirely with the Director of Public
Works whose decision upon the matter shall be final and obligatory upon the Contractor.
VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH C.R.S. 8-17.5-101 ET.SEQ. REGARDING HIRING OF ILLEGAL
ALIENS
(a) Employees, Contractors and Subcontractors: Contractor shall not knowingly employ or contract with
an illegal alien to perform work under this Contract. Contractor shall not contract with a subcontractor that fails
to certify to the Contractor that the subcontractor will not knowingly employ or contract with an illegal alien to
perform work under this Contract. [CRS 8-17.5-102(2)(a)(I) & (II).]
~ 1000 Englewood Parkway, Englewood, Colorado 80110 Phone
www.englewoodgov.org
3
(303) 762-2412 Fax (303) 783-6951
(b) Verification: Contractor will participate in either the E-Verify program or the Department program, as
defined in C.R.S. 8-17.5-101 (3.3) and 8-17.5-101 (3.7) respectively, in order to confirm the employment
eligibility~qf all employees who are newly hired for employment to perform work under this public contract. •
Contractor is prohibited from using the E-Verify program or the Department program procedures to undertake
pre-employment screening of job applicants while this contract is being performed.
(c) Duty to Terminate a Subcontract: If Contractor obtains actual knowledge that a subcontractor
performing work under this Contract knowingly employs or contracts with an illegal alien, the Contractor shall:
(1) notify the subcontractor and the City within three days that the Contractor has actual
knowledge that the subcontractor is employing or contracting with an illegal alien; and
(2) terminate the sub-contract with the subcontractor if, within three days of receiving notice
required pursuant to this paragraph the subcontractor does not stop employing or contracting with the
illegal alien; except that the Contractor shall not terminate the contract with the subcontractor if during
such three days the subcontractor provides information to establish that the subcontractor has not
knowingly employed or contracted with the illegal alien.
(d) Duty to Comply with State Investigation: Contractor shall comply with any reasonable request of the
Colorado Department of Labor and Employment made in the course of an investigation by that the Department
is undertaking pursuant to C.R.S. 8-17.5-102 (5).
(e) Damages for Breach of Contract: The City may terminate this contract for a breach of contract, in
whole or in part, due to Contractor's breach of any section of this paragraph or provisions required pursuant to
C.R.S. 8-17.5-102. Contractor shall be liable for actual and consequential damages to the City in addition to
any other legal or equitable remedy the City may be entitled to for a breach of this Contract under this
Paragraph.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Contract the day and year first written
above. •
1000 Englewood Parkway, Englewood, Colorado 80110 Phone (303) 762-2412 Fax (303) 783-6951 ~
www.englewoodgov.org
4
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .y ~'°'_)
(Department Director)
Date: ~',L--L§L__,_i:_-S--_
(City Manager)
Date: By:_ ~~~~~~~~~~ -~~~~~~~-
Lind a Olson, Mayor Pro Tern
ATTEST: __________ _
City Clerk
L bJt e,tl<ln,J;'°
Contractor (prin~paJy n~e) '
• y: _ _,,~ ~---=~'------'-/~------Date: lrl~-tr ~~ . ~v()() L. ~ QutJ.~
STATE OF t.1~tlO
COUNTYOF ~
On this \S+t
SS .
My commission expires: '1· \~· "tol\.t
~ 1000 Englewood Parkway, Englewood, Colorado 80110 Phone
www.englewoodgov.org
5
(303) 762-2412 Fax (303) 783-6951
• COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Date: Agenda Item: Subject:
June 15, 2015 11 c i Resolution for a Supplemental Appropriation of
Funds for Englewood 's Commercial Catal y st Grant
Program
Initiated By: Staff Source:
Finance and Administrative Services Department/ Eric Keck, City Manager and Acting
Community Development Department Finance Director
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
The City of Englewood's Mission is to promote and ensure a high quality of life, economic vitality, and a
uniquely desirable community identity.
Staff discussed the supplemental funding appropriation request for Englewood's Commercial Catalyst Grant
Program with Council at the June 1, 2015 Study Session and Council recommended staff take the necessary
actions to move this effort forward.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
• Staff recommends City Council approve a resolution authorizing a transfer and appropriation of $50,000 to
support Englewood's Commercial Catalyst Grant Program. The funds for this project originated from the
unassigned fund balance.
•
SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS:
DONORS FUND:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Unassigned Fund Balance
USE OF FUNDS:
Transfer Out to General Fund
GENERAL FUND:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Transfer In from Donor's Fund
USE OF FUNDS:
Community Development Department -Economic Incentives
Account Number-02-0801-57301
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
Last year Council authorized program changes, which allow funds to be used for permanent interior
improvements and the maximum grant amount was increased. These changes coupled with an active real
estate market have resulted in strong demand for the program funds. The Commercial Catalyst Program
receives an annual budget allocation of $100,000 per year. As of June 1, the program has committed 90%
of its funding allocation and has 2 grant applications pending approval that would take the program over
budget.
Given the trajectory of the program it is very likely that the program has the capacity to spend over
$1 00,000 on eligible projects.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Provide $50,000 in a supplemental appropriation to Englewood's Commercial Catalyst Grant Program; this
will reduce the Donor's Fund reserves by $50,000. Any unused funds remaining in the Commercial
Catalyst Program account at the end of the year will revert to the City's General Fund.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Proposed Resolution
•
•
•
•
•
•
RESOLUTION NO.
SERIES OF 2015
A RESOLUTION FOR A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR
ENGLEWOOD 'S COMMERCIAL CATALYST GRANT PROGRAM .
WHEREAS, the City of Englewood is required by City Charter to ensure that expenditures do
not exceed legally adopted appropriations; and
WHEREAS, in 2014 City Council authorized program changes, which allow funds to be used
for permanent interior improvements and the maximum grant amount was increased. These
changes coupled with an active real estate market have resulted in strong demand for the program
funds ; and
WHEREAS , the Commercial Catalyst Program receives an annual budget allocation of
$100 ,000 per year, as of June 1, 2015 the program has committed 90 % of its funding allocation
and has 2 grant applications pending approval that would take the program ov er budget; and
WHEREAS , funding is available from the remaining Englewood Small Business Development
Corporation (ESBDC) funds , which were transferred to the City after the ESBDC dissolved; and
WHEREAS, the 2015 Budget was submitted and approved by the Englewood City Council on
November 3 , 2014 ; and
WHEREAS , the passage of this resolution transfers and appropriates $50 ,000 to support
Englewood 's Commercial Catalyst Grant Program; and
WHEREAS , transfers funds to this project originated from the ESBDC funds .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Budget for the General Fund of the City of Englewood, Colorado , is hereby
amended for the year 2015, as follows :
DONORS FUND :
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Unassigned Fund Balance $50 ,000
USE OF FUNDS :
Transfer Out to General Fund $50 ,000
GENERAL FUND:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Transfer In from Donor's Fund $50,000
USE OF FUNDS :
Community Dev elopment Department -Economic Incentives $50 ,000
Section 2 . The City Manager and the City Treasurer are hereby authorized to make the above
changes to the 2015 Budget for the City of Englewood.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 15th day of June, 2015.
ATTEST:
Linda Olson, Mayor Pro Tern
Loucrishia A. Ellis , City Clerk
I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk for the City of Englewood, Colorado , hereby certify the
above is a true copy of Resolution No . __ , Series of 2015 .
Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk
•
•
•
..
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Date Agenda Item Subject
June 15, 2015 11 c ii Big Dry Creek Diversion
STAFF SOURCE INITIATED BY
Utilities Department Tom Brennan, Utilities Manager
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
On April 21 , 2014 Council approved, by motion, a settlement agreement with the City of Denver and
Grand County.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Water and Sewer Board, at their April 14, 2015 meeting, recommended Council approve, by motion, a
contract with Mclaughlin Whitewater Design Group.
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
Big Dry Creek discharges into the S. Platte River about 300 yards above the water intake at the Union Ave.
Pump Station. The Big Dry Creek project would give the option of allowing water to bypass the intake
•
structure. This bypass would alleviate hardness issues during low flow periods in the river. A structure for
this purpose had existed but was destroyed during the 1965 flood.
•
The proposed contract authorizes Mclaughlin Whitewater Design Group to perform Alternative Analysis ,
Preliminary Design and Special Services. The Special Services include base mapping and support during
the preliminary permitting process with the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The contract amount is $78,435 .00. The full contract amount will be funded from the $600,000 received
from the Denver Water Board Settlement. The settlement stipulates that the funds be dedicated to
alleviating water hardness at the Allen Water Treatment Plant.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Mclaughlin Whitewater Design Group Professional Services Proposal
Professional Services Agreement
•
•
•
Laughlin Whitewater
des i gn g r o u p
A DI VISIO N OF M ERR I CK & CO M PANY
March 30, 2015
Tom Brennan, P.E.
City of Englewood
Utilities Department
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, CO 80110
RE: Professional Services Proposal
Big Dry Creek Diversion Replacement -Englewood Colorado
Dear Mr. Brennan :
Mclaughlin Whitewater Design Group (MWDG), a Division of Merrick & Company, is submitting
this scope of work and budget to complete professional services for the above referenced
project. The work will include Alternatives Analysis, Preliminary Design and Special Services.
MWDG is proposing to team with ERO (permitting) and Aztec Survey (mapping).
BACKGROUND
A major flood in 1965 caused wide-spread damage along the South Platte River. Englewood's
diversion structure at the confluence of Big Dry Creek and South Platte River was destroyed.
MWDG met with you and Dave Coffman on site on February 10th to discuss the replacement of
the diversion. Project purpose and objectives discussed :
• Purpose : Improve raw water quality at Englewood's primary drinking water intake on
the South Platte River at Union Avenue . Water quality, particularly Hardness, in Big Dry
Creek is poor creating treatment issues.
• Objective: Divert flows from Big Dry Creek (approximately 5 cfs) year-round and
discharge below primary drinking water intake at Union Avenue.
Additional items discussed included:
• The City has contact the USACE regarding CWA 404 permitting. The USACE indicated
that a permit will likely be required and suggested the City work with a permitting
specialist.
• Flood Conveyance -FEMA Flood Hazard Zones have been mapped on Big Dry Creek .
MWDG anticipates that the proposed project will need to meet "no-rise" criteria .
M 0 Laughlin Whitewater Design Group. 2420 Alcott St reet, De nve r, CO 8021 1 T 30 3.96 4 .33 33 F 303.964.3355
• Urban Drainage and Flood Control District has completed a master plan for Big Dry
Creek including bank and channel stabilization. MWDG suggests that UDFCD be
approached for possible partnering and integration of master plan improvements with
diversion work.
• Hardness not from an identified point source -likely from soil exfiltration throughout
basin and urbanization.
• There are no water users between the confluence and proposed discharge location
besides Englewood.
SCOPE
Professional services scope of work has been divided into Special Services and Preliminary
Design.
Special Services
Task 1: Permitting Support
MWDG and design team (ERO) will provide the City support during the preliminary
permitting process for the following permits during this phase of work:
• CWA Section 404 -MWDG will support ERO's (subconsultant to MWDG) 404
permitting effort by providing project information, such as narratives of project
purpose and improvements, sketches, and assistance with initial consult with
USACE. Initial meetings will be held with the USACE. A permitting strategy will
be developed based on information gathered and consult with USACE. Final
permitting including formal applications would be completed in a future phase
(Final Design). Specific tasks that will be completed for CWA permitting are as
follows:
o Wetland Delineation
o Endangered Species Act Compliance
o Meetings with Regulators
o Prepare Pre-construction Notification to the USACE
o Prepare Hydrologic Depletions Analysis
o Project Coordination
• Floodplain -MWDG will coordinate with the City's Floodplain administrator Allen
White to determine required permitting and analysis.
Refer to Attachment C for the detailed permitting tasks and deliverables for the CWA
404 permit (ERO's scope).
Deliverables:
1. Coordinate, prepare for, and attend one meeting with USA CE w/ meeting notes .
•
•
•
__ ..,_ .. ---·~·-· --··--------·-·-~----------·-------------------··--····----•··---~-· ----' --.-. _____ ...._____ --·------·---------------------·----------·--·----·------·---
•
•
•
2. Support Documents 404 Permits (for ERO} -project descriptions, write-ups,
sketches, assistance with initial consult with USACE
3. See Attachment C for additional CWA 404 deliverables .
4. Coordinate, prepare for, and attend one meeting with Englewood Floodplain
Administrator w/ meeting notes.
Task 2: Stakeholder/Owner Engagement
It appears there are three primary Owners/Stakeholders in the project area -South
Suburban Parks and Recreation District (trail/bridge at Big Dry Creek), Colorado Water
Conservation Board (River Owner), and Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
MWDG would coordinate and attend three meetings with these entities to present the
proposed project. Meeting objectives would include identifying partnering
opportunities, ownership/easements, and any project requirements.
Deliverables :
1. Attendance at three {3} Stakeholder/Owner meetings.
2. Meeting materials (e.g . Power Point presentations, sketch/drawings)
3. Meeting notes
Task 3: Base Mapping
MWDG will complete topographic and bathymetric survey for the creek bottom, banks,
and top of banks from the confluence with South Platte River to east side of Sante Fe
Boulevard. Detailed ground survey will be conducted in diversion area. Cross sections
at approximately 200 foot intervals will be surveyed along the creek upstream of the
project area for flood and hydraulic analysis. MWDG completed survey work as part of
the River Run Park project. Mapping from that project will be combined with new
mapping for a complete base map for the project. Control points will be set . A private
utility locate service will be hired to "paint" existing utilities for survey. Englewood to
provide MWDG any available utility information in the project area. Potholing of
utilities will be completed by the City as needed based on preferred alternative.
Property ownership and easement research will be conducted by a title search with
limited field survey work to delineate approximate property lines and easements for
design purposes. In areas where research indicates property lines are close to
improvements or construction access will be needed additional field work may be added
by the City to more accurately locate property lines . Easements and property lines will
be added to base mapping.
Deliverables: -Site Base Map w/ Property Lines & Easements (approximate}
Preliminary Design Phase
Two concept alternatives will be developed for the diversion and conveyance systems.
Preliminary design will be completed for the City selected alternative . The following tasks will
be completed for this phase
Task 4: Coordination Meetings
Conduct meetings with City of Englewood during preliminary design phase for
coordination and review. Meetings will focus on project requirements, operations,
proposed designs, utility conflicts, permitting and approval processes.
Deliverables :
1. Conduct three {3} meetings
2. Meeting Agendas & Minutes
Task 5: Flood Analysis
The project requires a flood submittal and analyses . Proposed improvements that could
affect flood conveyance including diversion and intake structure will be analyzed. One
dimensional hydraulic modeling will be performed using HEC-RAS software. A Flood
•
Insurance Study has been completed by FEMA along Big Dry Creek. It is assumed that •
the City has the Effective FEMA HEC-RAS model in electronic form and that no
significant changes within the reach have been made since the effective date (i.e.
Existing and Corrected Effective Models are the same). MWDG will perform the flood
analysis using this model.
Deliverables:
1. Flood Analysis including a no-rise certification per FEMA requirements. A CLOMR
or LOMR is not included.
Task 6: Diversion Hydraulic Analysis
The hydraulic analysis will entail closed conduit hydraulics of the diversion piping,
analysis of the intake and bar rack. This will establish the required control section
elevations. The low-flow hydraulics of the main channel structure including low flow
notch and control section will then be conducted.
Deliverables :
1 . None (analysis summary and results included in Task 8}
Task 7: Alternative Concepts
It is anticipated that the general layout and alignment of the drop structure and pipeline •
will present no significant alternates or options. These will be developed to a schematic
•
•
•
level in this Task to support the development/selection of the intake design. Two
alternatives are anticipated for the intake -a side spill with fixed crest control and an
intake with an inline gate or adjustable crest control.
Deliverables:
Concept Drawings (Hardcopies (3), Electronic files (PDFs})
-Total Estimated Sheets: J.
-Diversion & Intake Plans: 2
-Plan & Profiles: 1
Task 8: Preliminary Design
The alternative selected by the City will be further developed to a preliminary design
level. The designs will integrate with improvements currently being planned along this
reach by MWDG. The drawings will be created in AutoCAD using MWDG's standard
format. A technical memorandum will be written and include the basis of design,
recommendations for final design, and an opinion of probable cost.
Deliverables:
1. Preliminary Drawings (Hardcopies (3), Electronic files (PDFs))
-Total Estimated Sheets: J.
-Diversion & Intake Plan: 1
-Plan & Profile: 1
-Detail Sheets: 1
2. Engineer's Opinion of Probable Costs
3. Technical Design Memorandum
PROJECT TEAM
MWDG (Prime) Key Staff
• Rick Mclaughlin, PE -Senior Project Manager
• Ben Nielsen, PE -Project Engineer/Project Manager
Sub-Consultants
• ERO -Permitting
• Aztec Survey -Base Mapping
Changes in key staff or sub-consultants will be approved by the City.
ASSUMPTIONS
1. Drawings 22" x 34" MWDG standards .
2 . No public or agency meetings (other than those outlined above) are required.
3. Preliminary Design will be accepted by the USACE Flood Readiness Branch without
significant changes to proposed improvements.
4. Permit application and fees are not included.
5. FEMA CLOMR not required .
6. All deliverable drawings in AutoCAD format .
7. Legal boundary survey is not required .
METHOD OF PAYMENT
Services will be billed on an hourly rate plus expenses basis, not to exceed the maximum
budget (unless authorized by City). Effort is estimated as shown on the attached Project
Budget Worksheet. The budget for preliminary design services is $48,135.
Special Services will be billed as hourly rate plus expenses. The amount of time required to
provide these services is difficult to predict and is dependent on work requested by the City and
other factors outside the control of the Design Team. A budget of $30,300 has been included
and will not be exceeded without previous written authorization by City.
The total budget of preliminary design and special services is $78,435.
SCHEDULE
MWDG will make reasonable efforts to perform the scope of work with expedience to meet the
following schedule:
• March 15, 2015 -Notice to Proceed
• April 15, 2015 -Mapping Completed
• June 15, 2015 -Concept Alternatives Completed
• August 15, 2015 -Preliminary Design Completed
Schedule shown is preliminary. City and MWDG will establish mutually agreed upon project
schedule once contract is approved by the Water and Sewer Board and City Council.
ATIACHMENTS
The following attachments are made part of this proposal
Attachment A Project Budget Worksheet
Attachment B Schedule of Standard Hourly Billing Rates
Attachment C Subconsultant Proposals
•
•
•
•
•
•
Please feel free to contact us at (303) 964-3333 if you have any questions or if you would like to
discuss this proposal further. We look forward to working with the City toward a successful
project.
Very truly yours,
Mclaughlin Whitewater Design Group, a Division of Merrick & Company
Richard Mclaughlin, P.E.
Senior Project Manager
Benjamin Nielsen, P.E.
Project Engineer
• Attachment A -PROJECT BUDGET WORKSHEET
•
•
• • ••
Attachment A .LSJ~~h1 1i~ ~h!t~':'c:it:r Project Budget Y/orksheet ::-;-..
ESTIMATED HOURS
AZTEC
McLaughlin Whitewater Design Group ERO SURVEY Extended Subtotal
Senior Project Design Senior Expenses company Task Cost
P.M. Engineer Engineer CADD Tech Clerical total
Tasks $175 $135 $90 $110 $75 74%
39 .0 174 .0 188 .0 92 .0 4 .0 $0 $57,655 $7,500 $13,280 $78,435 $78,435
1 Special Services -Permitting Support
$12 ,115
1.01 404 & 401 1 8 $1 ,255 $6,500 $7,755
1.02 Floodplain & UDFCD 1 4 $715 $1.000 $1 .715
1.03 Meetings -2 -USACE & Floodplain Admin 8 $1 ,080 $1 ,080
2 Special Services -Stakeholder/Owner Engagement
2.01 Prepare and attend three (3) meetings 2 9 $1 .565 $1 .565
3 Special Services -Bose Mopping $13,280 $13 ,280 $18,185
3.01 Complete Topographic and Bathyemetric Survey 4 $540 $540
3.02 Property ownership and easement research 2 2 $450 $450
3.03 Utility Locates 2 6 $810 $810
3.04 Develop Base maps in AutoCAD 3 4 8 12 $3 .105 $3 ,105
4 Preliminary Design Phase -Coordination Meetings $1,565
4 .01 Conduct three (3) meetings 2 9 $1 .565 $1 ,565
5 Flood Analysis $10,060
5.01 Run Dupl icative Effecti ve Model 2 2 $450 $450
5.02 Corrected Effective Model -Assume no changes
5.03 Existing Conditions Model 2 8 $990 $990
5.04 Proposed Conditions Model 2 8 32 $4 .310 $4.310
5 .05 No-Rise Certificate & Report 2 24 8 $4,310 $4 .310
6 Diversion Hydraulic Analysis
$3.400
6.01 Closed Conduit Hydraul ics 1 2 4 $805 $805
6.02 Intake & Grate Hydrauli cs 2 2 8 $1 ,340 $1.340
6.03 Channel Control Hydraulics 1 4 6 $1 ,255 $1,255
7 Alternative Concepts
$14 ,875
7 .01 Intake Options 4 8 16 $3 .220 $3 .220
7 .02 Pipe Ii ne Layout 1 6 12 $2.065 $2 ,065
7 .03 Drop Structure Schematic layout 2 4 6 $1 .430 $1,430
7 .04 Initial Costing 2 4 8 $1 .610 $1 ,610
7 .05 Drawings -3 sheets 2 8 8 40 $6 ,550 $6.550
8 Preliminary Design of Selected Alternative $18,235
8.01 Pre liminary Design of the Drop Structure 2 8 16 $2 .870 $2.870
project budget worksheet 1of2 3/412015 1:43 PM
<'
Attachment A .Laughlin Whitewater Project Budget Ylorksheet ~d••l g" 9r o u p :;-.-..
ESTIMATED HOURS
AZTEC
Mcloughlin Whitewater Design Group ERO SURVEY Extended Subtotal
Senior Proj ect De.s ign Senior Ex penses company Task Cost
P.M. Engineer Engineer CADD Tech Clerical total
Tasks $175 $135 $90 $110 $75 74%
39 .0 174.0 188 .0 92 .0 4 .0 $0 $57,655 $7,500 $13 ,280 $78 ,435 $78,435
8 .0 2 Prel i minary Design of Pipeline and Outlet 1 8 8 $1 .975 $1 .975
8 .03 Preliminary Design of Selected Intake 2 12 10 $2 ,870 $2 .870
8 .04 Drawings -3 sheets 2 8 8 40 $6 ,550 $6.550
8.05 Statement of Probable Cost 2 6 8 $1 ,880 $1,880
8.06 Technical Design Memorandum 2 8 4 4 $2,090 $2,090
project budget w ortl.sheet 2 of 2 3/4/20 15 1 :43 PM • • •
•
•
•
Attachment B -Schedule of Standard Hourly Billing Rates
Personnel Work Class
PROJECT MANAGEMENT:
Senior Project Manager
Project Manager
PROJECT ENGINEERING:
Senior Project Engineer
Project Engineer
Senior Design Engineer
Design Engineer
FIELD ENGINEERING I CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION:
Senior Field Engineer
Field Engineer
Cost Estimator
Senior Inspector
Inspector
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
Senior Landscape Architect
Landscape Architect
DRAFTING:
Senior CADD Technician
CADD Technician
ADMINISTRATION:
Clerical
Per hr.
$175.00
$150 .00
$155.00
$135.00
$110.00
$90.00
$145 .00
$125 .00
$110 .00
$115.00
$90.00
$125.00
$110.00
$110 .00
$80.00
$75 .00
Rates will be negotiated for personnel with qualifications not identified in the above schedule .
Monthly rates can be furnished for full-time Inspectors.
BILLABLE EXPENSES:
Subconsultant
Courier
Travel
Printing/Reproduction
Communications Equipment
GPS System
Vehicle Mileage
Other Materials or Equipment
Cost plus 5%
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
$100 .00/unit/day
Current Allowable IRS Rate
Cost plus 5%
This Schedule of Standard Hourly Billing Rates is considered to be "CONFIDENTIAL"
information. Release of any information contained herein to third parties is prohibited
without written consent from Merrick & Company. The above billing rates will be held
firm through December 31, 2015 .
• Attachment C -SUBCONSULTANT PROPOSALS
•
•
•
•
•
ERO RESOURCES CORPORATIO:\''S PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK
BIG DRY CREEK DIVERSIO.'\
SECTIO.'\ 40-4 PERl\IITTI!\"G
FEBRUARY 23, 2015
McLaughlin Whitewater Design Group (Client), on behalf of the City of Englewood
(City) requested that ERO Resources Corporation (ERO) prepare a scope of services to
pe1fonn ecological services for a proposed diversion of Big Dry Creek at the confluence
with the South Platte River in Englewood, Colorado . The proposed project will require
impacts to wetlands and other waters of the U.S along Big Dry Creek. Based on
preliminary project infonnation, it is likely Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is required. ERO will
perfom1 the following tasks to assist the Client \vith Section 404 pennitting .
Task 1: Wetland Delineation
ERO Resources will evaluate the overlook project area for wetlands or other potential
waters of the U.S. Areas with wetland indicator species will be investigated for soil and
hydrologic indicators. Wetlands will be delineated following the methods in the revised
online version of Corps · TVetland Delineation Manual (1987) and appropriate regional
supplement. Open water and channels will be determined based on the presence of an
ordinary high water mark as defined in 33 CFR Part 328. The boundaries of wetlands,
open water, and channels will be mapped to sub-meter accuracy by ERO using a Global
Positioning System (GPS). or, when appropriate, boundaries will be mapped onto an
appropriately-scaled aerial photograph. ERO will incorporate the wetland boundaries
into project base mapping provided by the Client and will send the Client a revised ba5e
mapping file that includes a layer with the boundaries of wetlands, open water, and
channels.
Prodiuts
Digital fik showing wetland boundaries
ERO RESOURCES CORPORATION'S PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK
BIG DRY CREEK DIVERSION
SECTIO:-.-40.:J PE&\llTTING
Wetland delineation map
Completed routine wetland determination fom1s
Assunqxums
Perfom1ing the delineation is \Yeather dependent. TI1e ground must be free of
snow, and in most instances, the soils must be unfrozen to collect the needed soil
data
This Scope of Work includes delineating wetlands within the project area
originally given. A new scope of work will be provided if the project area is
modified.
TI1e Client will arrange access to the property
Task 2. Endangered Species Act Compliance
A qualified ERO ecologist will conduct a habitat assessment for species listed as
threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act. Based on current
kno\vledge of the area, ERO assumes that no threatened or endangered species habitat
will be present. Ifno habitat for threatened or endangered species is found , ERO will
submit a habitat assessment letter to the U.S Fish and Wildlife Serrice (Service) for its
review mid approval.
Products
Draft and final habitat assessment letter delivered to the project team via
email; one hard copy mailed to the Service
Assumptions
No threatened or endangered species habitat is present and fonnal consultation
with the Service is not required . Iffonnal consultation is necessary, ERO will
prepare a new scope of work.
The Client will arrange access to the property
Task 3. Meetings with Regulators
ERO will arrange a preapplication meeting with the Corps, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Service, other interested regulatory agencies, and the project teani to
review project goals , site constraints, preliminary design , and potential unavoidable
impacts on waters of the U.S.
Products
• Memo summarizing ikms discussed during the agency meeting.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Asl11mpti.tms
ERO RESOUR CES CORPORATIOl'(S PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK
BIG DRY CREEK DTVERSI ON
S ECTION 404 PEIL\llTTI1'G
• One meeting will be conducted with the agencies and project team.
Task 4. Prepare Pre-construction Notification
If jurisdictional wetlands or other waters of the U .S . are found in the project area, and
it is detennined they \vill be impacted by the proposed project ERO will prepare a pre-
constmction notification (PCN) as patt of the request for authorization under one or more
nationwide pennits . 111e PCN will include a summary of the wetland delineation,
threatened and endangered species information, and information on grading and
stmctures provided by the Client.
ERO will coordinate with the Client on what other information ERO requires for the
submittal to the Corps. Typical infonnation includes plan and profile views, cross
sections, figures showing and quantifying impacts to jurisdictional areas , quantities of fill
material below the ordinary high water mark, details , background infonuation on other
approval requirements (e.g., those of the Federal Emergency Management Agency). and a
di sctL5Sion of the purpose of, and need for, the project. Typically, if wetland impacts are
less than 0 .1 acre, compensatory mitigation would not be required for the Corps .
Pr()(/11cts :
Draft PCN submitted to Client for review
Final PCN submittal to the Corps
Assumptions
• 111e proposed project will be authorized under a Nationwide Pennit.
• If the Corps detennines that an Individual 404 Pennit Application is
necessary, ERO will prepare a new scope of services.
• If it is determined the project can be authorized under the Urban Drainage and
Flood Control District Regional General Pem1it, the cost will increase by
$1 ,000 .00.
• Compensatory wetland mitigation will not be required. If wetland mitigation
is required, a new scope of work will be prepared for assistance with a wetland
mitigation plan .
ERO REsov"RCES CORPORAT101''s PROPOS ED SCOPE OF Woru;:
BIG DRY CREEK DIVE RSI ON
SECTIO'.' 40-l PER.'vl!TTING
Task 5. Prepare Hydro logic Depletions Analysis
111e proposed project would likely result in depletions to the South Platte Riwr
between the intake and outfall structure, and therefore the Corps may require a hydrologic
analysis of the portion of the South Platte River that would be affected by the diversion.
This includes providing infomrntion on existing aquatic resources potentially affected by
the project and the potential effects on these resources. Resources that would need
evaluation include flows , water quality, aquatic life, and wetland and riparian habitat.
Produas
• Hydrologic analysis to be included with the Section 404 of the CW A permit
application.
Ass11mptio11s
• 111e analysis would be based on information available from the City, Client, or
other resources and that additional infom1ation would not be required. If
additional research is required, ERO will prepare a new scope of work.
Task 6. Project Coordination
ERO will ensure all documents and figures are reviewed for technical and editorial
accuracy . This task also includes items associated with project coordination such as team
communication, project management, and quality a%urance. ERO will attend up to two
meetings with the project team to discuss the project status .
Estimated Costs
Tasks 1 through 6 will be completed on a time-and-materials basis for a cost
estimated to be $6,500.00, including expenses billed at cost plus 3% (see below for
breakout).
Task 1.
Task2.
Task3.
Task4.
Task 5.
Task 3.
Wetland Delineation
Endangered Species Act Compliance
Meetings with Regulators
Prepare Pre-Constmction Notification
Prepare Hydrologic Analysis
Project Coordination
Total including expenses
$1 ,000.00
$500.00
$500.00
$2,500.00
$1,500.00
$500.00
$6,500.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
Benjamin A. Nielsen, P.E.
Merrick/Mclaughlin Whitewater Design Group
2420 Alcott Street
Denver, CO 80211
Re : Proposal to Provide Surveying Services for
Big Dry Creek Diversion -Design Survey
Engle'NOod, Colorado
Ben:
February 18, 2015
Aztec Consultants, inc. is pleased to submit this proposal to provide surveying serv ices
for the Big Dry Creek Diversion Project located in Engle'NOod, Colorado. The
following outlines our Scope of Services, Fee and Schedule.
Scope of Services
1. Control Survey
• Establish horizontal and vertical survey control for the site based on AutoCAD files
prepared by MWDG. Client to provide the AutoCAD files containing point tabulation
for tying into existing control points. Vertical Datum will be NAVD88 .
• Set 4 control points on site in locations not likely to be disturbed during any
construction.
• Prepare a Survey Control Plan illustrating primary and site control points along with
coordinate and elevation tabulation , bas is of bearings and vertical benchmark with
datum.
2. Design Survey
• Field survey to locate improvements, ground features , trees and utilities within the
survey limits. The survey limits are outlined in red on the attached "EXHIBIT A".
• Contract with a utility locating company to have the underground utilities marked
within the mapping limits . All known utilities that are capable of "Electronic
Designation" will be located . Utilities must have a ''Traceable" line in order to be
deemed "Locatable". Any utilities without a "Traceable" line cannot be located.
• Field survey of the utility markings and add the data to the topographic base map.
• As-built survey of any sanitary and storm structures, manholes and inverts servicing
the site and add the data to the topographic base map .
• Survey water surface level at creek flow during survey .
• Survey pedestrian bridge deck and low chord elevations.
• Provide a final topographic base map in AutoCAD format containing planimetrics,
points, utilities, 1' contours and DTM .
lll.:\PROPOSAL\PR_11001-11400\Pr_11129.doc
8000 S. Lincoln Street • Suite 201 • Littleton, CO 80122 • Main (303) 713-1898 • Fax (303) 713-1897
Benj ami n A. Ni<!lse n
2117/2 0 15
3. Cross Section Survey
• Field survey to collect cross sections of the 8 sections in red on the attached
"EXHIBIT A".
• Survey 2 FEMA flood cross sections . Locations to be determ ined later .
• Grade breaks , tops, toes of slopes , banks of creek , flow line of creek, impro vements
will be captured along each cross section.
• Add the cross sect ion data to the topographic base map .
4. ROW/Ownership Map
• Research Arapahoe County records to obtain subdivision plats , Land Survey Plats
and deeds relevant to the area .
• Perform a field survey to locate section corners and property corners controlling the
ROW lines and parcel boundaries of the areas inside and adjacent to the portion
outlined in red on the attached "EXHIBIT A". There are 7 parcels affected .
• Resolve any discrepancies between field measured data and record data .
• Provide a final map with parcel boundaries and ROW lines and ownership
info rmation .
• Obta i n 7 title commitments (at $450 each) to provide the vesting deeds of the 7
subject parcels and to identify and plot existing easements and encumbrances of
record.
• Add all ownership and easement data to the AutoCAD base map .
Fee
The Client agrees to pay AzTec Consu ltants compensation for services performed on a
fixed fee basis, except as noted . The fees quoted herein will be used as a gu ide in
determining the percentage of work completed by AzTec , where applicable . Progress
billings will be made towards the end of each month for services performed during that
period . All bills are due and payable upon receipt of invoice.
1. Control Survey ..................................................................... Lump Sum Fee : $1,080
2. Design Survey ..................................................................... Lump Sum Fee: $3,200
3. Cross Section Survey ......................................................... Lump Sum Fee: $2, 100
4. ROW/Ownership Map .......................................................... Lump Sum Fee: $6,900
Total Lump Sum Fee: $13,280
Schedule
The Scope of Services for Tasks 1-3 will be completed within Three (3) weeks from the
date that W ritten Notice to Proceed is received . Schedule for Task 4 will be dependent
upon the t itle company's timeliness in providing the title comm itments.
M: \PROPOSAL \PR_11 001-1 1400\Pr_111 29 .d oc
•
•
•
•
•
•
Benjamin A. Nielsen
2/17/2015
General Terms
It is understood and agreed between the parties that the total fee as described herein is
for the scope of services as set forth herein . If unforeseen field conditions exist,
assumptions of this proposal are not met or additional services are requested by
Merrick/McLaughlin Whitewater Design Group, (Client), the scope of the additional
services and a lump sum fee will be determined and a change order will be prepared
and sent to Client describing the scope and fees of the additional services requested.
Work on the additional services will not commence until written authorization to proceed
is received via standard mail, facsimile or e-mail.
We look forward to being a part of your team for this project. Please call if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
AzTec Consultants, Inc .
Dale C. Rush PLS
Vice President
Approved and accepted this ____ day of ________ , 2015, by
(Signature)
~~~~~~~~~~~~-for~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
(Title) (Client name)
M :\PROPOSAL\PR_11001-11400\Pr_11129.doc
Benjamin A. Nielsen
2/17/2015
EXHIBIT "A"
SURVEY LIMITS & CROSS SECTION LOCATIONS
M:\PROPOSAL\PR_11001-11400\Pr_11129.doc
•
•
•
•
•
•
.-•• ·---------··---~-·--...... --...... ··••·•·•e--•--·-·•~·--•·--·---•·• -----------·-------· ----•-• -~--·--• __ ......__, ---------••-·•--,.·---·---··----·• •• -• -•---.. --.-· • • •• • ••
lllaughlin Whitewater
~design group • ••
A DIVISION OF MERRICK & COMPANY
May 27, 2015
Tom Brennan, P.E.
City of Englewood
Utilities Department
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, CO 80110
RE: Agreement for Professional Services Sub Consultants
Big Dry Creek Diversion Replacement -Englewood Colorado
Dear Mr. Brennan :
Mclaughlin Whitewater Design Group (MWDG), a Division of Merrick & Company, has notified
our sub consultants, Aztec Consultants, Inc. and ERO Resources Corporation, that they are
subject to the obligations of the Agreement between the City of Englewood and MWDG . A
copy of the Agreement was sent to each consultant for their review and acknowledgement.
Please feel free to contact us at (303) 964-3333 if you have any questions or need additional
contract documentation. We look forward to working with the City toward a successful project.
Very truly yours,
Mclaughlin Whitewater Design Group, a Division of Merrick & Company
Richard Mclaughlin, P.E.
Sen i or Project Manager
Benjamin Nielsen, P.E.
Project Engineer
M<Laughlin Wh itewater Design Group. 2420 Alcott Stree t, Denver, CO 80211 T 303.964.3333 F 303 .964.3355
R:\Marketing\2015 FY Proposals\Bi gDryCreekOiversion\Contract\MWDG _ BigDryCreekOiversion _Subs. doc
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Contract Number PSA/15·25
This Professional Services Agreement (the "Agreement") is made as of this 1st day of
-----~J~u~n~e, 201§.§, (the "Effective Date") by and between Mclaughlin Whitewater Design Group, A
OMsion oHv1errick & Company, a Colorado corporation ("Consultant'), and The City of Englewood ,
Colorado, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Colorado ("City"}.
City desires that Consultant, from time to time, provide certain consulting services, systems integration
services, data conversion services, training services, and/or related services as described herein, and
Consultant desires to perform such services on behalf of City on the terms and conditions set forth
herein.
In consideration of the foregoing and the terms hereinafter set forth and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto,
intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:
1. Definitions. The terms set forth below
shall be defined as follows:
(a) "Intellectual Property Rights"
shall mean any and all (by whatever name or
term known or designated) tangible and
intangible and now known or hereafter existing
(1) rights associate with works of authorship
throughout the universe, including but not
limited to copyrights, moral rights, and mask-
works, (2) trademark and trade name rights
and similar rights, (3) trade secret rights, (4)
patents, designs, algorithms and other
industrial property rights, (5) all other
intellectual and industrial property rights (of
every kind and nature throughout the universe
and however designated} (including logos,
"rental" rights and rights to remuneration),
whether arising by operation of law, contract,
license, or otherwise, and (6) all registrations,
initial applications, renewals, extensions,
continuations, divisions or reissues hereof now
or hereafter in force (including any rights in any
of the foregoing).
(b) "Work Product" shall mean all
patents, patent applications, inventions,
designs, mask works, processes,
methodologies, copyrights and copyrightable
works, trade secrets including confidential
information, data, designs, manuals, training
materials and documentation, formulas,
knowledge of manufacturing processes,
methods, prices, financial and accounting data,
products and product specifications and all
other Intellectual Property Rights created,
developed or prepared, documented and/or
delivered by Consultant, pursuant to the
provision of the Services .
2. Statements of Work. During the term
hereof and subject to the terms and conditions
contained herein, Consultant agrees to
provide, on an as requested basis, the
consulting services, systems integration
services, data conversion services, training
services, and related services (the "Services")
as further described in Schedule A (the
"Statement of Work") for City, and in such
additional Statements of Work as may be
executed by each of the parties hereto from
time to time pursuant to this Agreement. Each
Statement of Work shall specify the scope of
work, specifications, basis of compensation
and payment schedule, estimated length of
time required to complete each Statement of
Work, including the estimated start/finish
dates, and other relevant information and shall
incorporate all terms and conditions contained
in this Agreement
3. Performance of Services.
(a) Performance. Consultant shall
perform the Services necessary to complete all
projects outlined in a Statement of Work in a
timely and professional manner consistent with
the specifications, if any, set forth in the
Statement of Work, and in accordance with
industry standards. Consultant agrees to
•
•
•
•
•
•
exercise the degree of professionalism
ordinarily exercised by professionals practicing
in the same locality and specialty under the
same or similar conditions , subject to site
conditions and time limits and financial and
physical constraints imposed by the City, and
to utilize its expertise and creative talents in
completing the projects outlined in a
Statement of Work. Consultant makes no
warranties or guaranties, express or implied,
of any kind, nature or type whatsoever
(including those of condition, merchantability,
suitability and fitness for a particular purpose
or use) regarding the services. Consultant
expressly disclaims all such warranties or
guaranties. The foregoing is collectively
referred to as the "Standard of Care".
(b) Delays. Consultant agrees to
notify City promptly of any factor, occurrence,
or event coming to its attention that may affect
Consultant's ability to meet the requirements of
the Agreement, or that is likely to occasion any
material delay in completion of the projects
contemplated by this Agreement or any
Statement of Work. Such notice shall be given
in the event of any loss or reassignment of key
employees, threat of strike, or major equipment
failure. Consultant shall perform its services in
accordance with the agreed to project schedule for
each Statement of Work.
(c) Discrepancies. If anything
necessary for the clear understanding of the
Services has been omitted from the Agreement
specifications or it appears that various
instructions are in conflict, Consultant shall
secure written instructions from City's project
director before proceeding with the
performance of the Services affected by such
omissions or discrepancies.
4. Invoices and Payment.
Unless otherwise provided in a
Statement of Work, City shall pay the
amounts agreed to in a Statement of
Work within thirty (30) days following the
receipt of Consultant's invoice by City of the
work called for in a Statement of Work by
City. =If City disputes all or any portion of an
invoice for charges, then City shall pay the
undisputed portion of the invoice by the due
date and shall provide the following notification
with respect to the disputed portion of the
invoice. City shall notify Consultant within
fourteen (14) days of receipt of Consultant's
invoice of the specific amount disputed and
shall provide reasonable detail as to the basis
for the dispute. The parties shall then
attempt to resolve the disputed portion of such
invoice as soon as possible. Upon
resolution of the disputed portion, City shall
pay to Consultant the resolved amount.
5. Taxes. City is not subject to
taxation . No federal or other taxes (excise,
luxury, transportation, sales , etc.) shall be
included in quoted prices. City shall not be
obligated to pay or reimburse Consultant for
any taxes attributable to the sale of any
Services which are imposed on or measured
by net or gross income, capital, net worth,
franchise, privilege, any other taxes, or
assessments, nor any of the foregoing
imposed on or payable by Consultant. Upon
written notification by City and subsequent
verification by Consultant, Consultant shall
reimburse or credit, as applicable, City in a
timely manner, for any and all taxes
erroneously paid by City. City shall provide
Consultant with, and Consultant shall accept in
good faith, resale, direct pay, or other
exemption certificates, as applicable.
6. Out of Pocket Expenses. Consultant
shall be reimbursed only for expenses which
are expressly provided for in a Statement of
Work or which have been approved in advance
in writing by City, provided Consultant has
furnished such documentation for authorized
expenses as City may reasonably request.
7. Audits. Consultant shall provide such
employees and independent auditors and
inspectors as City may designate with
reasonable access to all sites from which
Services are performed for the purposes of
performing audits or inspections of
Consultant's operations and compliance with
this Agreement. Consultant shall provide such
auditors and inspectors any reasonable
assistance that they may require. Such audits
shall be conducted in such a way so that the
Services or services to any other customer of
Consultant are not impacted adversely.
2
8. Term and Termination. The term of
this Agreement shall commence on the
Effective Date and shall continue unless this
Agreement is terminated as provided in this
Section 8.
{a) Convenience. City may, without
cause and without penalty, terminate the
provision of Services under any or all
Statements of Work upon thirty (30) days prior
written notice. Upon such termination, City
shall, upon receipt of an invoice from
Consultant, pay Consultant for Services
actually rendered prior to the effective date of
such termination . Charges will be based on
time expended for all incomplete tasks as
listed in the applicable Statement of Work, and
all completed tasks will be charged as
indicated in the applicable Statement of Work.
(b) No Outstanding Statements of
Work. Either party may terminate this
Agreement by providing the other party with at
least thirty (30) days prior written notice of
termination if there are no outstanding
Statements of Work.
(c) Material Breach. If either party
materially defaults in the performance of any
term of a Statement of Work or this Agreement
with respect to a specific Statement of Work
and does not substantially cure such default
within thirty (30) days after receiving written
notice of such default, then the non-defaulting
party may terminate this Agreement or any or
all outstanding Statements of Work by
providing ten (10) days prior written notice of
termination to the defaulting party.
(d) Bankruptcy or Insolvency. Either
party may terminate this Agreement effective
upon written notice stating its intention to
terminate in the event the other party: (1)
makes a general assignment of all or
substantially all of its assets for the benefit of
its creditors; (2) applies for, consents to, or
acquiesces in the appointment of a receiver,
trustee, custodian, or liquidator for its business
or all or substantially all of its assets; (3) files,
or consents to or acquiesces in, a petition
seeking relief or reorganization under any
bankruptcy or insolvency laws; or (4) files a
petition seeking relief or reorganization under
any bankruptcy or insolvency laws is filed
against that other party and is not dismissed
within sixty (60) days after it was filed.
(e) TABOR. The parties understand
and acknowledge that each party is subject to
Article X, § 20 of the Colorado Constitution
("TABOR")-The parties do not intend to
violate the terms and requirements of TABOR by
the execution of this Agreement. It is
understood and agreed that this Agreement does
not create a multi-fiscal year direct or indirect
debt or obligation within the meaning of TABOR
and, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement
to the contrary, all payment obligations of City
are expressly dependent and conditioned upon
the continuing availability of funds beyond the
term of City's current fiscal period ending upon
the next succeeding December 31. Financial
obligations of City payable after the current fiscal
year are contingent upon funds for that purpose
being appropriated, budgeted, and otherwise
made available in accordance with the rules,
regulations, and resolutions of City and
applicable law. Upon the failure to appropriate
such funds, this Agreement shall be deemed
terminated.
(f) Return of Property. Upon
termination of this Agreement, both parties
agree to return to the other all property
(including any Confidential Information, as
defined in Section 11) of the other party that it
may have in its possession or control.
9. City Obligations. City will provide
timely access to City personnel, systems and
information required for Consultant to perform its
obligations hereunder. City shall provide to
Consultant's employees performing its
obligations hereunder at City's premises,
without charge, a reasonable work
environment in compliance with all applicable
laws and regulations, including office space,
furniture, telephone service, and reproduction,
computer, facsimile, secretarial and other
necessary equipment, supplies, and services.
With respect to all third party hardware or
software operated by or on behalf of City, City
shall, at no expense to Consultant, obtain a[f
consents, licenses and sublicenses necessary
for Consultant to perform under the Statements of
Work and shall pay any fees or other costs
associated with obtaining such consents,
licenses and sublicenses.
3
•
•
•
•
•
•
10. Staff. Consultant is an independent
consultant and neither Consultant nor
Consultant's staff is, or shall be deemed to be
employed by City. City is hereby contracting
with Consultant for the Services described in a
Statement of Work and Consultant reserves
the right to determine the metho?, mann~r and
means by which the Services will be
performed. The Services shall be performed by
Consultant or Consultant's staff, and City shall
not be required to hire, supervise or pay any
assistants to help Consultant perform the
Services under this Agreement. Except to the
extent that Consultant's work must be
performed on or with City's com~uters or City_'s
existing software, all materials u~ed 1n
providing the Services shall be provided by
Consultant.
11. Confidential Information.
(a) Obligations. Each p.arty he~eto
may receive from the other party information
which relates to the other party's business,
research development, trade secrets or
business' affairs ("Confidential Information").
Subject to the provisions and exceptions set
forth in the Colorado Open Records Act, CRS
Section 24-72-101 et. seq., each party shall
protect all Confidential Information of th~ other
party with the same degree of car~ as 1t uses
to avoid unauthorized use, disclosure,
publication or dissemination of its own
confidential information of a similar nature, but
in no event less than a reasonable degree of
care. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, each party hereto agrees not ~o
disclose or permit any other person or entity
access to the other party's Confidential
Information except such disclosure or access
shall be permitted to an employee, agent,
representative or independent consultant ?f
such party requiring access to the same in
order to perform his or her employment or
services. Each party shall insure that their
employees, agents, representatives, and
independent consultants are advised .of t~e
confidential nature of the Conf1dent1al
Information and are precluded from taking any
action prohibited under this Section 11.
Further, each party agrees not to alter or
remove any identification, copyright or other
proprietary rights notice which indicates the
ownership of any part of such Confidential
Information by the other party. A party hereto
shall undertake to immediately notify the other
party in writing ot all circumstances
surrounding any possession, use or knowledge
of Confidential Information at any location or by
any person or entity other than those
authorized by this Agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this
Agreement shall restrict either party with
respect to information or data identical or
similar to that contained in the Confidential
Information of the other party but which (1) that
party rightfully possessed before it r_eceived
such information from the other as evidenced
by written documentation; (2) subsequently
becomes publicly available through no fault of
that party; (3) is subsequently furnished
rightfully to that party by a third party without
restrictions on use or disclosure; or (4) is
required to be disclosed by law, provided that
the disclosing party will exercise reasonable
efforts to notify the other party prior to
disclosure.
(b) Know-How. For the avoidance of
doubt neither City nor Consultant shall be
prevented from making use of know-how and
principles learned or experience gained of a
non-proprietary and non-confidential nature.
(c) Remedies. Each of the parties
hereto agree that if any of them, their officers,
employees or anyone obtaining access to the
Confidential Information of the other party by,
through or under them, breaches any provision
of this Section 11, the non-breaching party
shall be entitled to an accounting and
repayment of all profits, compensation,
commissions, remunerations and benefits
which the breaching party, its officers or
employees directly or indirectly realize or may
realize as a result of or growing out of, or in
connection with any such breach. In addition
to and not in limitation of the foregoing, in the e~ent of any breach of this Section 11, the
parties agree that the non-breaching party will
suffer irreparable harm and that the total
amount of monetary damages for any such
injury to the non-breaching party ari~ing fro~ a
violation of this Section 11 would be 1mposs1ble
to calculate and would therefore be an
inadequate remedy at law. Accordingly, the
parties agree that the non-breaching party
4
shall be entitled to temporary and permanent
injunctive relief against the breaching party, its
officers or employees and such other rights
and remedies to which the non-breaching party
may be entitled to at law, in equity or under this
Agreement for any violation of this Section 11 .
The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive
the expiration or termination of this Agreement
for any reason_
12. Project Managers. Each party shall
designate one of its employees to be its
Project Manager under each Statement of Work,
who shall act for that party on all matters under
the Statement of Work. Each party shall notify
the other in writing of any replacement of a
Project Manager. The Project Managers for
each Statement of Work shall meet as often as
either one requests to review the status of the
Statement of Work .
13. Warranties.
(a) Authority. Consultant represents
and warrants that: (1) Consultant has the full
corporate right, power and authority to enter
into this Agreement and to perform the acts
required of it hereunder; (2) the execution of
this Agreement by Consultant, and the
performance by Consultant of its obligations and
duties hereunder, do not and will not violate
any agreement to which Consultant is a party or
by which it is otherwise bound under any
applicable law, rule or regulation; (3) when
executed and delivered by Consultant, this
Agreement will constitute the legal, valid and
binding obligation of such party, enforceable
against such party in accordance with its
terms; and (4) Consultant acknowledges that
City makes no representations, warranties or
agreements related to the subject matter
hereof that are not expressly provided for in
this Agreement
(b) Service Warranty. Consultant warrants
that its employees and consultants shall have
sufficient skill, knowledge, and training to
perform Services and that the Services shall be
performed in a professional and workmanlike
manner.
(c) Personnel. Unless a specific
number of employees is set forth in the
Statement of Work, Consultant warrants it will
provide sufficient employees to comp lete the •
Services ordered within the applicable time
frames established pursuant to this Agreement or
as set forth in the Statement of Work.. During
the course of performance of Services, City
may, for any or no reason , request
replacement of an employee or a proposed
employee. In such event, Consultant shall,
within five (5) working days of receipt of such
request from City, provide a substitute employee
of sufficient skill, knowledge, and training to
perform the applicable Services. Consultant
shall require employees providing Services at a
City location to comply with applicable City
security and safety regulations and policies .
(d) Compensationand Benefits.
Consultant shall provide for and pay the
compensation of employees and shall pay all
taxes, contributions, and benefits (such as, but
not limited to, workers' compensation benefits)
which an employer is required to pay relating
to the employment of employees. City shall not
be liable to Consultant or to any employee for
Consultant's failure to perform its •
compensation, benefit, or tax obligations .
Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold
City harmless from and against all such taxes,
contributions and benefits and will comply with
all associated governmental regulations,
including the filing of .all necessary reports and
returns.
14. Indemnification.
(a) Consultant Indemnification.
Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless
City, its directors , officers,
employees, and agents and the heirs,
executors, successors, and permitted assigns of
any of the foregoing (the "City lndemnitees")
from and against all losses, claims, obligations,
demands, assessments, fines and penalties
(whether civil or criminal), liabilities, expenses
and costs (including reasonable fees and
disbursements of legal counsel and
accountants), bodily and otherpersonal
injuries, damage to tangible property, and
other damages, suffered or incurred by a City
lndemnitee caused by: (1) any negligent or
intentional act or omission by Consultant •
or itsBJ! representatives in
the performance of Consultant's
obligations under this Agreement, or (2) any
5
•
•
•
material breach in a representation,
warranty, covenant or
obligation of Consultant contained in this
Agreement. (b) Infringement.
Consultant will indemnify ,defend,
and hold City harmless from all lndemnifiable
Losses arising from any third party claims
that any Work Product or
methodology supplied by Consultant infringes
or misappropriates any Intellectual Property
rights of any third party; provided, however,
that the foregoing indemnification obligation
shall not apply to any alleged infringement or
misappropriation based on: (1) use of the
Work Product in combination with products or
services not provided by Consultant to the
extent that such infringement or
misappropriation would have been avoided if
such other products or services had not been
used; (2) any modification or enhancementto
the Work Product made by City or anyone
other than Consultant or its sub-consultants; or
(3) use of the Work Product other
than as permitted under this Agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consultant is
not liable to City under this paragraph for
claims of infringement or improper
appropriation resulting from the use of
designs that are not developed or proposed
by Consultant and are specifically mandated
by City.
(c) Indemnification Procedures. Not
with-standing anything else contained in this
Agreement, no obligation to indemnify which is
set forth in this Section 14 shall apply unless
the party claiming indemnification notifies the
other party as soon as practicable to avoid any
prejudice in the claim, suit or proceeding of any
matters in respect of which the indemnity may
apply and of which the notifying party has
knowledge and gives the other party the
opportunity to control the response thereto and
the defense thereof; provided, however, that
the party claiming indemnification shall have
the right to participate in any legal proceedings
to contest and defend a claim for
indemnification involving a third party and to be
represented by its own attorneys, all at such
party's cost and expense; provided further,
however, that no settlement or compromise of
an asserted third-party claim other than the
payment/money may be made without the prior
written consent of the party claiming
indemnification.
(d) Immunity. City, its officers, and its
employees, are relying on, and do not waive or
intend to waive by any provision of this
Agreement, the monetary limitations or any
other rights, immunities, and protections
provided by the Colorado Governmental
Immunity Act, C.R.S. 24-10-101 et seq., as
from time to time amended, or otherwise
available to City, its officers, or its employees.
15. Insurance.
(a) Requirements. Consultant agrees
to keep in full force and effect and maintain at
its sole cost and expense the following policies
of insurance during the term of this Agreement:
(1) The Consultant shall comply
with the Workers' Compensation Act of
Colorado and shall provide compensation
insurance to protect the City from and against
any and all Workers' Compensation claims
arising from performance of the work under
this contract. Workers' Compensation
insurance must cover obligations imposed by
applicable laws for any employee engaged in
the performance of work under this contract, as
well as the Employers' Liability within the
statutory limits.
(2) Commercial General Liability
Insurance and auto liability insurance
(including contractual liability insurance)
providing coverage for bodily injury and
property damage with a combined single limit
of three million dollars ($3,000,000) per
occurrence.
(3) Professional Liability/Errors and
Omissions Insurance covering acts, errors and
om1ss1ons arising out of Consultant's
operations or Services in an amount of one
million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence.
(4) Employee Dishonesty and
Computer Fraud Insurance covering losses
arising out of or in connection with any
fraudulent or dishonest acts committed by
Consultant personnel, acting alone or with
others, in an amount of one million dollars
($1,000,000) per occurrence.
6
(b) Approved Companies. All such
insurance shall be procured with such
insurance companies of good standing,
permitted to do business in the country, state
or territory where the Services are being
performed. (c) Certificates. Consultant
shall p rovide City with certificates of insurance
evidencing compliance with this Section 15
(including evidence of renewal of insurance)
signed by authorized representatives of the
respective carriers for each year that this
Agreement is in effect. Certificates of
insurance will list the City of Englewood as an
additional insured. Consultant shall not
cancel, reduce, or otherwise materially change
the insurance afforded under the above
policies unless thirty (30) days' notice of
such cancellation, reduction or material
change has been provided to City.
16 . Rights in Work Product.
(a) Generally. Except as specifically
agreed to the contrary in any Statement of
Work, all Intellectual Property Rights in and to
the Work Product produced or provided by
Consultant under any Statement of Work shall
remain the property of Consultant. With
respect to the Work Product, Consultant
unconditionally and irrevocably grants to City
during the term of such Intellectual Property
Rights, a non-exclusive , irrevocable , perpetual,
worldwide, fully paid and royalty-free license,
to reproduce, create derivative works of,
distribute, publicly perform and publicly display
by all means now known or later developed,
such Intellectual property Rights. However, all
drawings, specifications and other documents
prepared by Consultant under this Agreement
are not intended or represented to be suitable for
reuse by City or others on extensions of the work
or on any other product. Any such reuse by City
without the prior express written consent of
Consultant shall be at City's sole risk and without
liability or loss exposure to Consultant.
{b) Know-How. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary herein, each party and
its respective personnel and consultants shall
be free to use and employ its and their general
skills, know-how, and expertise, and to use,
disclose, and employ any generalized ideas,
concepts, know-how, methods, techniques, or
skills gained or learned during the course of
any assignment , so long as it or they acquire
and apply such information without disclosure
of any Confidential Information of the other
party.
17. Relationship of Parties. Consultant is
acting only as an independent consultant and
does not undertake , by this Agreement, any
Statement of Work or otherwise, to perform
any obligation of City, whether regulatory or
contractual, or to assume any responsibility for
City's business or operations. Neitherparty shall
act or represent itself, directly or by implication,
as an agent of the other, except as expressly
authorized in a Statement of Work.
18. Complete Agreement. This
Agreement contains the entire agreement
between the parties hereto with respect to the
matters covered here in.
19. Applicable Law. Consultant shall
comply with all applicable laws in performing
Services but shall be held harmless for
violation of any governmental procurement
regulation to which it may be subject but to
which reference is not made in the applicable
Statement of Work. This Agreement shall be
construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Colorado. Any action or proceeding
brought to interpret or enforce the provisions of
this Agreement shall be brought before the
state or federal court situated in Arapahoe
County, Colorado and each party hereto
consents to jurisdiction and venue before such
courts.
20. Scope of Agreement. If the scope of
any provisions of this Agreement is too broad in
any respect whatsoever to permit enforcement
to its fullest extent, then such provision shall be
enforced to the maximum extent permitted by
law, and the parties hereto consent to and agree
that such scope may be judicially modified
accordingly and that the whole of such provision
of this Agreement shall not thereby fail, but that
the scope of such provis ion shall be curtailed
only to the extent necessary to conform to law.
21. Additional Work. After receipt of a
Statement of Work, City, with Consultant's
consent, may request Consultant to undertake
additional work with respect to such Statement of
7
•
•
•
•
•
•
Work. In such event , City and Consultant shall
execute an addendum to the Statement of
Work specifying such additional work and the
compensation to be paid to Consultant for such
additional work.
22. Sub-consultants. Consultant may not
subcontract any of the Services to be provided
hereunder without the prior written consent of
City. In the event of any permitted
subcontracting, the agreement with such third
party shall provide that, with respect to the
subcontracted work, such sub-consultant shall
be subject to all of the obligations of
Consultant specified in this Agreement.
23. Notices . Any notice provided pursuant
to this Agreement shall be in writing to the
parties at the addresses set forth below and
shall be deemed given (1) if by hand delivery,
upon receipt thereof, (2) three (3) days after
deposit in the United States mails, postage
prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested
or (3) one (1) day after deposit with a
nationally-recognized overnight courier,
specifying overnight priority delivery. Either
party may change its address for purposes of
this Agreement at any time by giving written
notice of such change to the other party
hereto.
24. Assignment. This Agreement may not
be assigned by Consultant without the prior
written consent of City. Except for the
prohib ition of an assignment contained in the
preceding sentence, this Agreement shall be
binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
heirs, successors and assigns of the parties
hereto.
25. Third Party Beneficiaries. This
Agreement is entered into solely for the benefit
of the parties hereto and shall not cont er any
rights upon any person or entity not a party to
this Agreement.
26. Headings. The section headings in
this Agreement are solely for convenience and
shall not be considered in its interpretation .
The recitals set forth on the first page of this
Agreement are incorporated into the body of
this Agreement. The exhibits referred to
throughout this Agreement and any Statement
of Work prepared in conformance with this
Agreement are incorporated into this
Agreement.
27. Waiver. The failure of either party at
any time to requ ire performance by the other
party of any provision of this Agreement shall
not effect in any way the full right to require
such performance at any subsequent time; nor
shall the waiver by either party of a breach of
any provision of this Agreement be taken or
held to be a waiver of the provision itself.
28 . Force Majeure. If performance by
Consultant of any service or obligation under
this Agreement is prevented, restricted,
delayed or interfered with by reason of labor
disputes, strikes, acts of God, floods, lightning,
severe weather, shortages of materials,
rationing, utility or communications failures,
earthquakes , war, revolution, civil commotion,
acts of public enemies, blockade, embargo or
any law, order, proclamation, regulation,
ordinance, demand or requirement having
legal effect of any governmental or judicial
authority or representative of any such
government, or any other act whether similar
or dissimilar to those referred to in this clause ,
which are beyond the reasonable control of
Consultant, then Consultant shall be excused
from such performance to the extent of such
prevention, restrict ion, delay or interference. If
the period of such delay exceeds thirty (30)
days, City may, without liability, terminate the
affected Statement of Work(s) upon written
notice to Consultant.
29. Time of Performance.
Consultant shall perform its
services in accordance with
the agreed to project
schedule for each Statement
of Work.
30. Permits . Consultant shall at its own
expense secure any and all licenses, permits
or certificates that may be required by any
federal , state or local statute, ordinance or
regulation for the performance of the Services
under the Agreement. Consultant shall also
comply with the prov isions of all Applicable
Laws in performing the Services under the
Agreement. At its own expense and at no cost
to City, Consultant shall make any change,
alteration or modification that may be
8
necessary to comply with any Applicable Laws
that Consultant failed to comply with at the
time of performance of the Services.
31. Media Releases. Except for any
announcement intended solely for internal
distribution by Consultant or any disclosure
required by legal, accounting, or regulatory
requirements beyond the reasonable control of
Consultant, all media releases, public
announcements, or
public disclosures (including, but not
limited to, promotional or marketing material)
by Consultant or
its employees or
agents relating to
this Agreement or its subject matter, or
including the name, trade mark, or symbol of
City, shall be coordinated with and approved in
writing by City prior to the release thereof.
Consultant shall not represent directly or
indirectly that any Services provided by
Consultant to City has been approved or
endorsed by City or include the name, trade
mark, or symbol of City on a list of
Consultant's customers without City's express
written consent.
32. Nonexclusive Market and Purchase
Rights. It is expressly understood and agreed
that this Agreement does not grant to Consultant
an exclusive right to provide to City any or all of
the Services and shall not prevent City from
acquiring from other suppliers services similar
to the Services. Consultant agrees that
acquisitions by City pursuant to this Agreement
shall neither restrict the right of City to cease
acquiring nor require City to continue any level
of such acquisitions. Estimates or forecasts
furnished by City to Consultant prior to or
during the term of this Agreement shall not
constitute commitments.
33. Survival. The provisions of Sections 5,
S(g), 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 23,25 and 31
shall survive any expiration or termination for
any reason of this Agreement.
34. Verification of Compliance with C.R.S.
8-17.5-101 ET.SEQ. Regarding Hiring of
111 egal Aliens:
(a) Employees, Consultants and
Sub-consultants: Consultant shall not
knowingly employ or contract with an illegal
alien to perform work under this Contract. •
Consultant shall not contract with a sub-
consultant that fails to certify to the Consultant
that the sub-consultant will not knowingly employ
or contract with an illegal alien to perform work
under this Contract. [GAS 8-
17.5-102(2)(a)(I) & (II).]
(b) Verification: Consultant will
participate in either the E-Verify program or the
Department program, as defined in C.R.S. 8-
17 .5-101 (3.3) and 8-17.5-101 (3.7),
respectively, in order to confirm the
employment eligibility of all employees who are
newly hired for employment to perform work
under this public contract for services.
Consultant is prohibited from using the E-Verify
program or the Department program
procedures to undertake pre-employment
screening of job applicants while this contract
is being performed.
(c) Duty to Terminate a
Subcontract: If Consultant obtains actual
knowledge that a sub-consultant performing •
work under this Contract knowingly employs or
contracts with an illegal alien, the Consultant
shall;
(1) notify the sub-consultant and
the City within three days that the
Consultant has actual knowledge that
the sub-consultant is employing or
contracting with an illegal alien; and
(2) terminate the subcontract
with the sub-consultant if, within three
days of receiving notice required
pursuant to this paragraph the sub-
consultant does not stop employing or
contracting with the illegal alien; except
that the Consultant shall not terminate
the contract with the sub-consultant if
during such three days the sub-
consultant provides informationto
establish that the sub-consultant has
not knowingly employed or contracted
with an illegal alien.
(d) Duty to Comply with State
Investigation: Consultant shall comply with •
any reasonable request of the Colorado
Department of Labor and Employment made in
the course of an investigation by that the
9
•
•
•
Department is undertaking pursuant to C.A.S.
8-17 .5-102 (5)
( e) Damages for Breach of Contract:
The City may terminate this contract for a
breach of contract, in whole or in part, due to
Consultant's breach of any section of this
paragraph or provisions required pursuant to
CAS 8-17 .5-102. Consultant shall be liable for
actual and consequential damages to the City
in addition to any other legal or equitable
remedy the City may be entitled to for a breach
of this Contract under this Paragraph 3
10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have caused it to be executed by their
authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. This Agreement may be executed in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one
and the same instrument.
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
(Department Director)
By: ______________________ .Date: ___ ~
Linda Olson, Mayor Pro Tern
ATIEST: __________ _
City Clerk
Address
VbJv~. 0o ~~l (
City, State,' Zip Code .,..---.
By I £L« , f2 /L,_.4 L 1 I ~ {signature)~ --1872 e>-1r-e r: /C..e:N+ a ,J
(Print Name)
•
•
Title: 'f/2-//.../0J.?A-L-/?/Z. j?tz.cJd, NA1\JA,q t:::..li!-
Date:
------------~
STATE OF Cc<.-o ~ADO )
COUNTY OF f:;EN VER f ss. ~ l
On this ZiD tH day of MAY 20!5 before me personally apptred. te12.€!.£NC£ P.
/(£~Vo N , known to me to be the ThiNCI f'AL / SR. FaTh"'r,T f;laNAei~ OF
t--ta<..RJCK +Com Pr+1'Jl/ the corporation that executed the within and foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation •
for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said
instrument.
II
•
•
•
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year
first above written .
My commission expires :
12
•
•
•
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 2015
BY AUTHORITY
COUNCIL BILL NO. 26
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER -------
A BILL FOR
AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE CREATING A MORATORIUM ON THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW MARIJUANA CONSUMPTION ESTABLISHMENTS.
WHEREAS, the Englewood City Council received complaints concerning a business that is
open to the general public and permits the burning, smoking, inhaling the vapors of, or otherwise
consuming marijuana in any form on the premises of the business; and
WHEREAS, Council desires a six month moratorium on any future marijuana consumption
establishments; and
WHEREAS , Licensing staff will work together with the Police Department and the Fire
Marshal to evaluate this information and forward it on to the Englewood Liquor and Marijuana
Licensing Authority for recommendations, and ultimately to City Council; and
WHEREAS, Community Development staff will work together with Licensing staff, the
Police Department, and the Fire Marshal, to submit language addressing the proper zoning for
marijuana consumption establishments to the Planning and Zoning Commission for
recommendations and ultimately to City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT THERE SHALL BE A MORATORIUM ON THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW MARIJUANA CONSUMPTION ESTABLISHMENTS.
Section 1. An emergency is hereby declared requiring immediate passage of this Ordinance
for the immediate preservation of the public property, health, peace and safety; it is hereby
declared that an emergency exists and that this Ordinance shall take effect upon its final passage.
Section 2. The moratorium declares a six month moratorium on any marijuana consumption
establishments. Marijuana consumption establishments shall mean an organization, business,
club, or commercial operation that allows its members or guests to burn, smoke, inhale the
vapors of, or otherwise consume marijuana in any form on the premises of the business.
Section 3. During said moratorium the City Council directs City staff to develop appropriate
recommendations to Council, consistent with the Colorado Constitution and State regulations .
Section 4. The City Council finds the provisions of this Ordinance are temporary in nature
and are intended to be replaced by subsequent legislative enactment so that the moratorium or
temporary suspension as specified in this Ordinance shall terminate on January 21, 2016 .
12 bi
Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading as an emergency Ordinance on the 15th
day of June, 2015 .
Published by Title as an emergency Bill for an Ordinance in the City's official newspaper on the
18th day of June, 2015.
Published as an Emergency Bill for an Ordinance on the City's official website beginning on the
17th day of June, 2015 for thirty (30) days.
Linda Olson, Mayor Pro Tern
ATTEST:
Loucrishia A. Ellis , City Clerk
I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado , hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true copy of an Emergency Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full ,
and passed on first reading on the 15th day of June, 2015.
Loucrishia A. Ellis
•
•
•
•
Lou Ellis
Subject: FW : Denver Health
Attachments: CRS 16-3.pdf; Poudre Valley.pdf
From: Dan Brotzman
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 1:47 PM
To: #City Council
Cc: John Collins; Eric Keck; Joan Weber; Eric Ziporin (EZiporin@sgrllc.com); Nancy Fritz; Lou Ellis
Subject: FW : Denver Health
A request came in this morning asking if Englewood wishes to be specifically identified on the cover of a brief concerning
the payment of a prisoner's medical bills when in custody -CRS 16-3-401(2) . As you can see from the thread below,
staff supports the request. I will bring this up un City Attorney's Choi ce at tonight to meet the briefing deadline.
From: John Collins
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 10:54 AM
To: Eric Keck; Dan Brotzman; Joan Weber
Cc: Nancy Fritz
Subject: RE: Denver Health
Dan,
I am good with being identified in the brief. We have been dealing with this issue for years . Eric, I can fill you in
tomorrow on the possibilities of this ruling which we have pushed back on for years.
From: Eric Keck
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 10:47 AM
To: Dan Brotzman; John Collins; Joan Weber
Cc: Nancy Fritz
Subject: RE: Denver Health
This is an interesting case here now that we utilize Denver Paramedics. However, it appears to be addressing the Denver
Health hospital which we will seldom be transporting residents from Englewood to this facility.
I would be alright with being included if it is the hospital.
Thank you .
Eric Keck
From: Dan Brotzman
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 10:37 AM
To: John Collins; Eric Keck; Joan Weber
1
Cc: Nancy Fritz
Subject: FW : Denver Health
Your thoughts on being identified in the brief?
From: Eric Ziporin [mailto:EZiporin@sgrllc.com ]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 10:30 AM
To: Margaret R. Brubaker; Betz, Jeff; 'Margaret Braun'; Dan Brotzman; Tree Ablao; Anthony B. Lettunich
Cc: Jennifer Kemp; Tami Tanoue
Subject: Denver Health
All:
My office has been retained by CIRSA to draft an amicus brief in support of an appeal filed by the City of Arvada . The
appellee is Denver Health, and the issue is the payment of medical bills pursuant to CRS 16-3-104.5(2) and Poudre Valley
Health Care Inc. v. City of Loveland, 85 P.3d 558 (Colo . App . 2004).
In our view, the underlying fact pattern is the right one for an appeal as the patient in question attempted to commit
suicide and thus his injuries were not only self-inflicted but occurred prior to him being in the "custody" of the Arvada
Police Department. In order to avoid duplicating the arguments being made by the City of Arvada, our amicus brief will
focus on the fact that neither the U.S. Constitution nor the Colorado statute stand for the proposition that a municipality
is required to pay for the medical bills (only requirement is that we provide care if the individual is in our custody).
The brief will be submitted on behalf of CIRSA and its participating members. Two members, the City of Wheat Ridge
and the City of Golden, have requested that they be specifically identified on the cover of the brief. Given that all of
your cities have dealt with this issue, I wanted to inquire as to whether any of you also would like to be specifically
identified as parties to the brief. The brief will be filed this Thursday, June 18, so it would be greatly appreciated if you
could let us know before then.
Thank you all for your consideration of this request.
Eric M. Ziporin
Attorney
Senter Goldfarb & Rice , LLC
3900 E . Mexico Ave., Suite 700
Denver, CO 80210
303-320-0509 phone
303-320-0210 fax
eziporin((j)sgrl le.com
The information contained in this electronic message is privileged and confidential. The information is intended only for use of the
person or entity named above . If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution of copying
of this communication is prohibited . If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify me by telephone
or e-mail. Thanks
2
~ 70
the
wit·
pon
rom
Jm-
15
ble
Ing
the
my
ins
my
)n.
2).
of
an
"e·
of
en
ry
1i-
17
1e
1e
"Y
I·
I-
d
·-
e
1
Arrest -Searches and Seizures 16-3-402
A peace officer may conduct a consensual search only after articulating the
, ;,tt'i?'~ing factors to, and subsequently receiving consent from, the person subject to the
·t0 a:ch or the person with lhe apparent or actual authority to provide permission to search :C vehicle or effeclS. The factors are:
· (I) The person is being asked to voluntarily consent to a search; and
·f (II) The person has lhe right to refuse the request to search.
~ (c) After providing the advisement required in paragraph (b) of lhis subsection (1), a
peace officer may conduct the requested search only if the person subject to the search
~voluntarily provides verbal or written consent. Other evidence of knowing and voluntary
:Consent may be acceptable, if the person is unable to provide written or verbal consent.
~! .(2) A pence officer providing the advisement required pursuant to subsection (1) of this
section need not provide a specific recitation of the advisement; substantial compliance with
the substance of the factors is sufficient to comply with the requirement.
. .. (3) If a defendant moves to suppress any evidence obtained in the course of the search,
the court shall consider the failure to comply with the requirements of this section as a
.factor in determining the voluntariness of the consent.
. (4) This section shall not apply to a search conducted pursuant to section 16-3-103, n
-valid search incident to or subsequent to a lawful arrest, or a search for which there is a legal
basis other than voluntary consent. This shall include, but not be limited to, a search in a
correctional facility or on correctional facility property, a detention facility, county deten-
tion facility, custody facility, juvenile correctional facility or any mental health institute or
mental health facility operated by or under a contract with the department of human
services, a community corrections facility, or a jail or a search of a person subject to
probation or parole by a community supervision or parole officer when the person has
consented to search as a term and condition of any probation or parole.
Source: L . 2010: Entire section added, (HB 10-1201), ch. 176, p. 638, § I, effective
April 29.
PART4
RIGHTS OF PERSONS IN CUSTODY
16-3-401. Treatment while in custody. (l) No unlawful means of any kind shall be
used to obtain a statement, admission, or confession from any person in custody.
(2) Persons arrested or in custody shall be treated humanely and provided with
adequate food, shelter, and, if required, medical treatment. Anyone receiving medical
treatment while held in custody may be assessed a medical treatment charge as provided in
section 17-26-104.5, C.R.S.
Source: L. 72: R&RE, p. 202, § l. C.R.S. 1963: § 39 -3-401. L . 97: (2) amended, p.
192, § 2, effective April I.
ANNOTATION
Law reviews. For note, "The Admissibility
of Confessions Obtained Before Arraignment -
Federal Rule", sec 21 Rocky Mt. L. Rev. 98
(1948). For note, "Involuntary Confessions -
Founh Stage in Colorado", see 31 Dicta 133
(1954).
The duty Imposed by subsection (2) on a
detaining governmental entity to provide
medical treatment Implies an Inherent obll·
gatlon on the part of the entity to pay the
costs of such treatment. Poudre Valley Health
Care , Inc. v. City of Loveland, 85 P.3d 5?8
(Colo. App . 2003).
16-3-402. Right to communicate with attorney and family. (1) Persons who are
arrested shall have the right to communicate with an attorney of their choice and a member
of their family by making a reasonable number of telephone calls or by communicating in
558 Colo. 85 PACIFIC REPORTER, 3d SERIES
ceed in fonna pauperis and (2) motions filed
under the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure
to dispose of an inmate's action without ne-
cessity of trial.
[2) Because a statute that establishes no
conditions should be applied without addi-
tional requirements, we conclude that a mag-
istrate may, without the consent of the par-
ties, net upon an inmate's in forma pauperis
request and dispose of the case in accordance
with its ruling thereon. It follows, then, that
appellate review of the magistrate's rulings
in this case is governed by C.R.M. 7(a). See
People ex rel Gamer v. Garner, supra, 33
P.3d at 1242 (employing similar analysis in
connection with child support enforcement
orders).
(3] Where, as here, a magistrate has en-
tered an order on a matter in which consent
is not required, a party is not entitled to
pursue appellate review unless he or she has
first filed a motion for review of the magis-
trate's order in the district court. This mo-
tion must be filed no later than fifteen days
subsequent to the date of the magistrate's
order or judgment. C.R.M. 7(a)(l).
Here, plaintiff failed to file any motion for
review in the district court. Consequently,
we lack jurisdiction to consider his appeal.
See People e.i: reL Gamer v. Garner, supra,
33 P.3d at 1243.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Judge ROY and Judge PLANK • concur.
• Siuing by assignment or the Chief Justic e under
provisions o f Colo . Const . an . VI , § 5(3 ), nnd
POUDRE VALLEY HEALTH CARE!
INC., d/b/a Poudre Valley Hospital
Plaintiff-Appellee, '
v.
CITY OF LOVELAND, a Colorado
Municipal Corporation,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02CA0550.
Colorado Court of Appeals,
Div. IV.
July 17, 2003.
Certiorari Denied March 8, 2004.
Private hospital brought action against
city to recover medical costs incurred in the
care and treatment of a pretrial detainee.
The Larimer County District Court, Terence
A Gilmore, J., granted summary judgment
in favor of hospital . City appealed. The Court
of Appeals, Kapelke, J., in an issue of first
impression, held that the city was liable to
the hospital for the medical costs incwTed in
the treatment and care of pretrial detainee,
where a statute expressly imposed a duty
upon governmental entities to provide medi-
cal treatment to individuals in their custody.
Affirmed.
Prisons e=>18(6)
A city was liable to a private hosp ital for
the medical costs incurred in the tn•ntment
and care, including surgery and ho!-!pitalizll-
tion for several days, of a pretrial <ll'tainee,
where statute expressly imposed a dut~· upon
governmental entities to provide meclicnl
treatment to individuals in their l'ttstodY
which duty implied, at a minimum, an inher·
ent obligation to pay the costs of such treat·
ment and care . -West's C.R.S A ~ 10-.'Y'"
401(2).
§ 24-51 -1105, C .R.S.2002 .
POUDRE VALLEY HEALTH v. CITY OF LOVELAND Colo. 559
Cheu 85 P.3d 558 (Colo.App. 2003)
L w office of Carole C. Schriefer, Carole We review de novo a trial court's grant of
;cJuiefer, Fort Collins, Colorado, for summary judgment. Ryder v. Mitchel~ 54 ~iamtiff-Appellee . P.3d 885 (Colo.2002).
Hall & Evans L.L .C., David R. Brougham, In EBtelw v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 97 S.Ct.
venver, Colorado, for Defendant-Appellant. 285, 60 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976), the Supreme
Bell , Boge & Associates, P.C ., Gregory S. Court held that the constitutional prohibition
Bell, for Amic~s .curiae Colorado Health & against cruel and unusual punishment under
Hospital A.'lSoe1ation . the E ighth Amendment requires governmen-
Opinion by Judge KAPELKE .
Defendant, City of Loveland (City), ap·
peals from the summary judgment enta-ed
by the trial court in favor of plaintiff, Poudre
Valley Health Care, Ine ., d/b/a Poudre Valley
Hospital (Hospital). The issue presented is
~ one of first impression in Colorado: whether
a governmental entity has an obligation to
pay for outside medical costs incurred in the
i:are and treatment of a pretrial detainee in
its custody. We conclude that such an obli-
gation exists, and we therefore affinn .
~·. 1' Following his arrest by City of Loveland
police officers , a pretrial detainee injured
himself when he escaped through the window
of a police transport van that was traveling
at a high speed. He was taken by ambu-
lance to the Hospital, where he underwent
medical treatment, including surgery, and re·
mained for several days. The Hospital pre-
sented a statutory claim to the City for
, $26 ,625, the cost of the medical treatment
and hospitalization. The City denied the
claDn .
In this action, the Hospital seeks to recov -
er from the City the costs of the medical
treatment provided the detainee . In the trial
COUrt, the parties stipulated to the facts and
the Hospital moved for summary judgment,
·~g that a governmental entity's constl -
cal onaJ and statutory duty to provide medi-
care to a person in its custody includes a ~d · Ponding-duty to compensa te'lhe pro ·
. th er of that care. The trial court granted
· ~oapitaI's motion and entered judgment
l!Jedj t the City in the amount of the claimed
-, . Cal costs.
tu~e City contends that there is no consti -~na] or statutory basis for the Hospital's
· llnd that the trial court therefore erred ~ gtanting summary judgment. We dis · ee.
tal entities to provide medical care for con-
victed prisoners .
Later, in City of Revere v. Massachusetts
General Hospita~ 463 U.S. 239, 103 S.Ct.
2979 , 77 L.Ed .2d 605 (1983), the Court deter-
mined that, based on the Due Process Clause
of the Fourteenth Amendment, governmental
entities also have a duty to provide medical
care to pretrial detainees in their custody.
In Revere, however, the Court declined to
hold that the Constitution requires the de-
taining governmental entity to pay the costs
incurred by the medical provider. The Court
stated: "[A]s long as the governmental entity
ensures that the medical care needed is in
fact provided , the Constitution does not dic·
tate how the cost of that care should be
allocated as between the entity and the pro-
vider of the ,.care. That is a matta-of state
law." City of Revere v. Mass . Gen. Hosp.,
supra, 463 U.S. at 245, 103 S.Ct. at 2983 .
Accordingly, here, we must apply Colorado
Jaw in determining whether the City is liable
for the costs incurred by the Hospital in
affording medical care and treatment to the
pretrial detainee.
The Hospital argues that Colorado statuto-
ry law imposing a duty on governmental
entities to provide medical care for detainees
in their custody supports the trial court's
ruling.here ,. -We agree.
A reviewing court must construe statutes
so as to give effect to the legislative intent
and must interpret them as a whole in order
to give effect to the entire statutory scheme.
People v. Felgar, 68 P.3d 1122 (Colo.App.
2002 ). To discern that intent, we must look
first to the plain language of the statute and
interpret the words in accordance with their
commonJy accepted meanings. Bodelson v.
560 Colo. 85 PACIFIC REPORTER, 3d SERIES
City of Littleton, 36 P .3d 214 (Colo.App.
2001).
No Colorado statute expressly addresses
the allocation of costs of medical care for
pretrial detainees. However, as the Hospital
points out, § 16-3-401(2), C.R.S.2002, impos-
es a duty on a detaining governmental entity
to provide such medical care:
Persons arrested or in custody shall be
treated humanely and shall be provided
with adequate food, shelter, and, if re-
quired, medical treatment. Anyone re-
ceiving medical treatment while held in
custody may be assessed a medical treat-
ment charge as provided in section 17-26-
104.5, C.R.S.
(Emphasis added.)
Courts in other jurisdictions have consid·
ered whether a statutory duty of a govern-
mental entity to provide medical care in-
cludes or implies an obligation ~ pay the
costs of such care.
For example, in United Hosp. v. D~nnun
zio, 514 N.W.2d 681, 684 (N.D.1994), the
North Dakota Supreme Court held that a
statute requiring "[t]he governing body of
each jail [to] ... [e]nsure that inmates have
adequate medical care" includes "the inher-
ent duty to pay for such care." In so ruling,
the court quoted a North Dakota attorney
general opinion: "It would be illogical to
assume that the governing body of a jail
would be financially responsible for the medi-
cal care and treatment of an inmate if provid-
ed in the jail, but would not be financially
responsible for that same treatment if pro-
vided by an established medical facility such
as a local hospital." United Hosp. v. D~n
mmzio, supro, 514 N.W.2d at 686 (citing
North Dakota Attorney General Opinion 14
at 4 (1986)).
A panel of the Florida District Court of
Appeal made a similar ruling in Ho.~pital
R.ocu:d.JJLJ)_ire_ctD..nL.P, _D1irki;J, ~2!i ~..Q,2d_5-Q,
51 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982). Based on a Flori-
da statute obligating sheriffs to furnish medi·
cal care for prisoners, the panel held that "a
sheriff who has custody of such a prisoner is
responsible for his immediate medical needs
and impliedly agrees to pay the necessary
and reasonable hospital charges when a Pris. . ·
oner in his custody must be hospitaliZed, n,;,
In contrast, in Myrtle Beach Hospita~ 1?te.1
v. City of Myrtle Beach, 341 S.C. 1, 532 '
S.E.2d 868 (2000), relied on by the City her
the South Carolina Supreme Court held ~
statutes mandating the humane treatment of
inmates of the state penitentiary and county
jails, and making the director of the Depart.
ment of CoITeCtions responsible for proPer
care of the prisoners, did not demonstrat:e a
legislative intent concerning the allocation of
rnedieal expenses for pretrial detainees.
Similarly, the Alabama Supreme Court, In
Baptist Health Systems, Inc. v. City of Mid.
field, 792 So.2d 1095 (Ala.2001), rejected an
argument that a governmental entity Was
liable for medical costs of a pretrial detainee
where the pertinent statute, by its exprese
terms, applied only to medical treatment af.
forded prisoners confined in a county jail
The court reasoned that, in the absence of
any statute imposing an obligation to pay the
costs of medical treatment rendered to a
pretrial detainee, the entity would not be
liable.
Unlike the statutes addressed in Myrll~
Beach Hospital and Baptist Health Systcnt3,
supro, however, § 16-3-401(2) expressly im-
poses on the detaining entity a duty to pro-
vide medical treatment for individuals "in
custody." The statutory duty in Colorado is
not limited to treatment afforded individuals
who have already been convicted and incar·
cerated.
We agree with the analysis and holdings in
United Hospital v. D~nnmizio, s11pm, and
Hospital Board of Directors v. D11rki.~. sri·
pra, that where, as here, a state statute
unambiguously imposes a duty on go\·ern·
mental entities to provide medical treutment
and care for detainees in their custody, such
a duty includes or, at a minimum, implies un
inherent obligation to pay the costs of such
treatment and care. Our conclusion accords
Witn Ehe -GenerBI-.A:Ssemoly'S· evfOefit tnten~
to place the duty to provide such medicnl
care on the entities holding the detainees.
The City argues that the Colorado statutes
do not create a private right of action in
favor of a medical provider such as the Hos ·
IN RE MARRIAGE OF MOHRLANG Colo. 561
CUeu85 P.3d 561 !Colo.App. 2003)
pita! here, and that the trial court therefore
erred . In asserting this argument, the City
retie:; on Board of County Conuni~sioner,q v.
MorC'l1111cl, 764 P.2d 812 (Colo.1988), and
Quiu/111111 v. IndWJtrial Commission, 178
Colo. 1:11, 495 P.2d 1137 (1972).
In ,Wm·rland, the court stated: "We agree
thut has1.>rl on Qttintano, the absence of a
cJeai· t•x1iression of legislative intent to allow
a ch·il liability remedy for breach of the
ohliA"t1lions imposed on the County by the
[buillling code] precludes recovery by [plain-
tiff] in thiH case." Bd. OJ County Comm 'rn ·u.
Mmt•/t1111I, 111tpra, 764 P.2d at 817.
Hel'C!, however, the Hospital does not con-
tend that § 16-3-401(2) creates a private
right of action, as such, based on a breach or
violation of a statutory duty owed by the
City. On the contrary, the treatment provid-
ed by the Hospital actually served to fulfill
the City'R statutory duty to provide medical
care to the pretrial detainee in its cu.c;tody.
Under these circumstances, the cases dis-
cussing creation of private rights of action
based on violations of statutory duty are
simply ina11posite in our view.
Rather, the Hospital's position -and the
basis of our ruling-ls that in expressly re-
quiring governmental entities to provide
medical care to pretrial detainees, the Gener-
al Assembly intended to impose a corollary
duty to pay for such care. It is illogical to
assume that the General Assembly intended
to impose a duty on governmental entities to
Provide or arrange for the provision of such
tare for pretrial detainees, but did not intend
to require the entities to pay the very medi -
cal providers through whose efforts that duty
is discharged.
di We therefore conclude that the trial court
d not err in entering summary judgment ~eterm1nmglh"iittlfe~ -Cicyis1iiiDie l.Ollie
tr Ospital for the medical costs incurred in the
eatrnent and care of the pretrial detainee.
The judgment is affirmed.
f)~dge ROTHENBERG and Judge
LEy concur.
In re the MARRIAGE OF Rebecca
K. MOHRLANG, Appcllee,
and
Bruce A. Mohrlang, Appellnnt.
No. 02CA0360.
Colorado Cow;; of Appeal!;,
Div. IV.
July 31, 200:-J.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 18, 2003.
Certiorari Denied March 8, 2004.
Former husband appealed from order of
the District Court, Morgan County, Douglas
R. Vannoy, J., valuing his interest as benefi-
ciary in trust in dissolution action. The Court
of Appeals, Graham, J., held that trial court
was required on remand to reconsider wheth-
er value of former husband's trust interest in
11tock should be discounted by appropriate
rate becam1e of delay in husband's receiving
his interest, possibility forfeiture, and other
contingencies.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
1. Divorce €=>287
Trial court was required on remand in
distributing property in dissolution proceed·
ing to reconsider whether value of former
husband's trust interest in stock should be
discounted by appropriate rate because of
delay-in husband 1s-receiving--his·interest,pos--
sibillty forfeiture, and other contingencies.
2. Divorce ¢=>253(3)
In distributing property in a dissolution
proceeding, to determine net present value of
a vested interest that is subject to contingen-
cy of survival to a future date, a court may
consider a variety of circumstances, including
actuarial information concerning life expec-
tancy of settlor or cwTen~ beneficiaries.