HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-09-03 (Regular) Meeting Agenda PacketI. Call ·a O •d er .
4. ~OIi L,111 .
Age nda for th e
~egul a r ."'l eeting of t he
En glewood City Co uncil
Tu es day, Se pte mber 3, 2013
7:30 p m
Eng lewood Civ ic Ce11 1er -Co ur K il Chamb e rs
1000 [n glewood f'a rk\\Jy
En glewood. C.O 80 1 rn
5. Consid e r.1 1io11 o( Min ut es or P,ev io us Se ssion.
a . fv\i111J1 p<; fr om ,h~ Re gul;u fi 1y lo11nrd MP ~ti nc o f Aur,1:st l Y, :m u
b. Rcc.ogn111 o n o f Sc hedu led Pl1bl 1c Com n1en 1. ( rhis is an opp o r1 u111ty fo r 1he publ, 10 addre ss (i1y
Council. Co un cil ma ) ask q uestio ns fo , d J1HiL <.1 l iun , Uut th t',~ w ill nu t Uc c111y d1c1l ogu ~. Plt:rt :>t:: li1111 1
)' w p1e:,t'11 :,11 1u 11 t u five m i111 1t 1.1:,.)
7. Rec.o gni t1o n o f Unschc dt1led Pu bli c Co,nmcnt. (T his 1s an oppo 11un11y for the p ub lic' to ~,ddres s Cit y
01mci l Co un cil m ,vy ask q ues 11011s fo r d ,rnftea ll o n, b ut tfH.'re w ill 11 0 be any dialoKU C PleJ S" li m it
your prese 11 1,11 1on 10 thr ee rrnn utes . Time 1o r uns d1 edu leJ µub lic con m e nl 11i.1~ be l1r111 1ed 10 45
n111iu l e !>, an d 1f l11 11i 1ed. sh;ill be co 11 1in11 ecl 10 Ge ne r.i i D 1scu)s 1on )
( n11 11 r il Re sponse l o Publ ic Co mrn en l
8. Comm un rca rion s, Procl.1mat io 11 5, rin J Appoi1111n e nb.
l'lr,1se note h }'O U h .we 1 d1sa b1li ~· .,nd need a u •r lt;uy ;ud~ o· se"•Ces, pleJ ~~ noufi, 11c Cir,• o ( F:n!j le~\Ood
('03 7C,2-?,10 5) at le.1 s1 48 ho w ,; m ;1,hw1 r l' n : \,h,•11 ,;n \'1r cs .1,e 11ef>dPd
I ngh::woud C,ty oundl AMcnd,,
C.r1ucnibc.-r J , :!OI 3
P,1~c :!
9. Co n 5 n t AgendJ It e ms
.1 . Approv;,I of O rdm an ces 0 11 Fir i;I Re ad in g
o u11 cil Bill No. 4 4 Ret:orrnnend:11 10 11 i ro m 1hc U1ilitl t:s D •p anmen t to ,1pp ruvc ,J t;,11
fu 1 ,111 u rd111rt11 Lt' dU lhor i;,in g d \.Vd!io l w,1 1c 1 uun ector'!io Agu::e nn~nt ,-.ith thl! Oow M ,,r
\.V<,1er a nd S<111i 1,,1 i on District. Staff So urce: Sttwar1 H. Fo nda, Dirl'ctor of Ulilili cs..
Ii . Cou ncil Bill N o . 4 .. -Recomme1 1dJ ti on fr in th ~ U tililies Departm ent 10 apprc,vc a bill
to r .in o rd1n ;i n rp .111th n n11 11g ;i \1\1;:ic;t P\\'a lf'r (. nn nPclnr's Agree m e nt w 11h Co lum bmc
Water and Sa niutio n Dis1ric 1. Staff Source: Ste wart H. Fonda, Direct or of U1iliti cs.
iii. Counci l Oill No. 4G -Recornmcn d :11io 11 from lhl..' U1ili1 ic!lo DepM1me n1 10 appro, e ,1 bill
f r ,111 ordin an ce approving Supplcmcn l tf:!2 tc, 1h c C o nn ecto r's Asrccmc n t wirh V:illcy
San ilal io n D is1ric 1 au 1ho11z1n g 1he i11cl t1 sio n o f l,m d wnhi11 11 ·0 cl 1s1ric1. Sta H So urce:
Slrwar1 H . t-nnrfa , DirPrlnr of Utilil it•c..
I.,. Apµ,uv.,1 uf O u...1 i11 ._11 11 .. L') U II s~L un d Rcc1 di m:
Counc il Bi ll N o. I\ I -Rccomm n cl.i tio n fr o111 1hc Co mmun it y D evt!lo pmcrH
D ep,Htmenl 10 apµrovc a b ill fo r an o rdin r&n .w th o rizing ln e re dcm p 1io 11 Jncl sJ lc of
H\Ht; \r,11 lh t-ox ~l rPQ I
c. Re solution s drtd M rn iun:,.
10 . Public Hc,,rin It e ms. 1No Pu b lic Hea 1mgs sd,edule d .)
11 . O rU11 1trn l~:-.. Res u ltwu 11~ ;ua.l M u urn 1!lo
,1. Approw1I oi Ordinc1 n cc-s on Fi r:.a RcJ dir1g
Council Gill No 7 1 -R(')etH mP nrt;ilion ir,1111 f:1r (o, rrnrni1y l)PvP ln pmPnl
D ep nrnnen 1 10 acl o p l a lJ 11l ior an o r din an ce Jpprovin g the pr oposed N,w,1JC
A p an mc 111 s Pl,1 11n cd U1 1il De \ elo p ,nent. S1J fi fur th e r 1:;."to 11111 1t'1 1Lh 1'1,11 Curn 1_il !lol!t ,1
Publ i( I \c ._11 in g (0 1 St:p h.?1n b e1 16, 20 l J Iv ga 1her publk. 1np ul o n th e p1oposcd
Pl,rn ric d Unil D evelopm l'llt. Slaff So urce : Brook Re ll , Pl.1nn c r II .
Counc il Bill N o . 4 7 -Recommer,d,11i o 11 iro111 th e U 1ilr ti es D ep;i r1 me11t to .1 dop1 ., b ill
for .,n ordin ;mce ,1pp rov 111 g 1h e pro posed 20 IJ VVater Conse rvn1 1o n Plan . Slaff
So urce : Stewart H. Fo nda, Di rector o f Ulil ili c!lo.
b . App ro, ,,I oi O rdi n a nces o n Seconrl Re,1cli ng
Counci l Bill No. 37 , auth orizing il rneridmen1s to Tille 16: Unifi ed D evelo prn~rH Code
rE"g;urh n g d1 std lP n P", h rP wPrt PS ,,nrl w i neries.
Pk.>a sr not" I( rnu h,h'f' ,1 il t\;1hd ,ty ,,nci 111._NI .111v1l1.11y ,11th o , scrv,cC'). p'cue 11 011fy 1hr C.ry nl Fnglewoort
130 ·1 it.i2 •:405) ,1 1 h:.t ..i .;a huur~ 111 ,n1w111u: uf \\he , :,1.:1\'t1.\!S ,1 tc nc-cdcd
(t1gl1:~,o cJ t 1\v (fluri 1..1I ,.,gene!,
Sctllc 1111J1 •1 J, 20 \J
1\rgt 3
i1. Co un cil Bill No. 43, submitt ing to .i vu11.: u r 1hc 1 ~~b it!, .. d t!lt"L I0 1s of Ilic .:.:i 1y L•(
Cngle\,ood JI the n ex t sc hed uled Mun 1c1pc1 I t lecuon, propose d u1 1tia11 ve 1el,11111 g 10
dedication of Park property
c Res o l ution s ,mcl M ot io ns.
Recom men d,11io n fr om th e mmuni l')' D cve lo p111en 1 D pi1r111 1 nl I ,,pprovc-.i
reso lu1i o n ,1do p 1inc th e Eng lewoocf light R,1 il C rndor Pl.in as a S11pp lem~111r1ry
Plann in g Docmmm t in su pport o ( Ro .1dm ,1p Fn glewood: Th e 2003 Eng lewood
Comprehen sive Pl.in Staff So urce Jo hn o lioril, long R,m gc Pl annl'r II.
11. Recon1 men da 11or1 fr om the Li 11 le ton/[n gle \\OOd VVa stewa1er TrcJ 1m en t Pl ant
Supervisory Comm i tt ee l o au1 hor1 ze. b \• 111 011011 . a profess 1on.1 I srrv1ccs ,1gr eemc11 1 wi1h
Hrmvn ;mrt C.1lch•1P!I fn , r•ng inf'lflrinc c;u ppntl ,i nd d e~ig n (erviCe'= for rh e lnle rnn
Di5in fccr1 on lrn provc n 1c11t5 Pro jects. Staff So urce: Stcw :irt H. Fondil , Dir,.ctor o f
Utilit ie s and Chong Woo, (11 gi11ccri11 g/M,1inlcn~,n\.C M .1 1111ger.
12. C t•n ra l D1su 1ss 1on.
~1. Ma yo r's ChoicL·.
h _o u11ci 1 M mh e rs· Choi ce .
14. C11v A 11 o m t!y's Repu rt
15. ,\d JOlHlllllt::lll
l'l cJsc 11 0 1e If yo u ht1 \"e ,, d1)Jbtl 11y ;rnd need ,1 111uliary ,ml ,; 01 se r\1ccs. plc,,sc 110 1,iy the Ci ty o f (nglew fl ocl
(J0l 76:!-:?.:0 5J ,1 1le;1s14& l"10u1s 1n ,1 d \,1nceofwhcn sen·tCE"S ,tr(' uced('cl
Ci ty Co uncil Me eting
Septem ber 3, 2013
Ida M ay Nicholl
47 40 S. Lipan
Englewood, CO
I'm n ot repr ese nting any group here ton ig ht, ju st myse lf and the plain folk s who are not
onvolved with poltt,cs, Ju st folk s I've met alo ng the w ay who want ed to save our Englewood
Hi st ory .
It Is ama zing what you ca n find out b•1 ju st vi siting with fo lks and _having disc ussi on s on di He rent
topics . You quickly find out how th ey fee l about certa in th i ng s and particularly r ig ht now o ur
own Englewood City Governm cr,t.
It 1s sa d to hea r the many comments of distru st , so I will spare al l of us fro m that. We brought
before you a few months ago clo se t o one th ousand names on pet itions and made co pies to
prc~e nt to c.1c h of yo u, mainly t o show yo u t hat people care in Ol,r city a nd out of our ci t y who
were former Engl ew ood Citizen s.
W hat is important th at so mewhere down the line th at folks see softenin g of City Cou ncil and
City Management are not all the things that folk s b elieve right now I So plea se City Cou ncil why
no t let our Citize ns win this one . Why kno ck them d<Jwn again ? Th ese petitio ns sign ed b y
cili1en s to st op the sale of Park Propert y is a hot issu e and importa n t t o t hem .
I'm asking you City Council, and for the man y other citizens who are no t here tonight, because
they think it does not matter whether th ey are here or not , t heir voice wi ll not be heard, so I
am askine fo r t hem an d myself as we ll .
Pl eas e Ci ty Council, put th e Ordinance on th e Novemb er Ballot for the Ci t izens t o I/ate on the
Sa le of Park Land . Our Ci ty Attorn ey Dan Brotzman , signed oH o n the wording of th ese
pet itions. The citizens ca rried t he petitions and we re abl e to ge l rn o re thdn ~11uu ~h si~na t ure s
for t h is ball et . It 1s ve ry important that w e up hold our Ci tize n s and our Cit y Charter and not
mak e decisions coun t er t o what o ur City Ch arter dn r s say .
Respectfully,
Id a May Nicho ll
• CO UNCIL COMM UNICATION
---
Date A genda Item Subject
Seplem b I ) 20 1) 9 a I Row M rll Sa ni tat ion D istrict
Conn ector's Agr e e men t
-
I NITIATEO BY STAFF SOU RCE
U til ities D ep,1 rtmrni
---1
SIPW;)rl H Fo nda, Director o i Utilit ies
COUNCIL G OAL ,\ND PRE VIOUS COUN CIL ACTIO N
Ci ty Cou nc tl appr o \'ed a s1anda rcl Sa nu ary Se w er Conn ect or 's 1\gree mcnt i n Ja nu\11y, 1988.
RF COMMFNnFn ACT IO'I
At t lit::11 Junt:: 11, 20 1 J meeting the Eng ll'\\OOcl \VJ 1e 1 and S wer Doar d recomme nded oun cil appr ov al o f
the Bow Ma r ~a nu at1 on 1~t u c-\1\/as te\,ater Co nn ec 1o r ~ Agree mt:!rll
BACK G Rv'.::~D , ANA LYS IS, AND ALTFRNATIVES IDE NTIF IED
• S,rn ha ry sew t:!r se rv ice i!:i p rov ided to d1stn::1s m nsrde oi the Eng!ewou tl tu rpur,ll t! Uu u11Uc 1n~::i tl uuugl 1 tht!
standa, d conn ec to r's agreem enl. n ,e l rtt le to n/[nglew o d \'\1astewa tc , I re atmen t f>la n t 1s ,1b!e to rec eive
Jnd tr e..)t sewage tra ns mitt eC by va rio u s d1stli cts. 1 he alt ached ag reem en t a dd re ss es th is se ice with th e
d is tric t t h~1t owns .m d mai ntai ns 1he sewer rr.a b s.
•
In th e Bow l\•lar \Vat er and Sanita tio n D istric t there are ap p rox imately 93 taps. Th e Bo w Ma r Sd1 li ld 1t u11
Dis trict Sani tat10n Di st rict ·.vi I co nt in ue to own Ihe li nes and w ill be res ponsibl e tor ca p 1I,,I Irnpr ove ment s In
its syst m. TI, a tta ched map shows the Bow Md r 5,m 1ta 11on Dbtrict bo unda ri es
The City Au o,ney's o il ice h(15 reviewed .1r.d a p pr oved the standard Connecto r's Ag ,ee111 e n t.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
N o ne
LIST OF ATTA CHMENTS
M m u1es iro m Ju e 1 1, 2013 \!\la te r and Sewer Board Mcc 11 ng
/\\i11 u1es fr o m Jul v 9, ~0 13 \1Vate r a n d Sc\\e r Board M e eti ng
Pro posed Bill l o , an O rdinance
•
•
Absc lll :
\V ~TER & 'EW ER BOAR D
Ml ~UTES
T UESDA Y,J NEll ,20 13
5:00 P.M.
Oak ky, \V q;gi ns, Habc.:nkh t1 \\'oggo ncr .. \ll ourt:, \\l oocl ward, Hum s, Ols n, Lay,
Penn
Also present : Siu Fo nda Dircc1nr of U1 ili1 ic,. To m Bre 11nan Uti li ties Eni;incc r
The mee ting wa s cal led 10 o rder a 5:02 .
~'
I. MIKUTE. O F T HE ~IAY 14 , 20 13 I !IT ER BOARD Mf.:ET l'IG.
The 13na rcl ap pro ved 1h c \\'al ·r and ew er Board Minu tes of the May 14. 20 13 mee tin g. A
co rrc c1i on in 1he M11 y 14. 20 13 Mmulc, was noted . Mr. Oak ley wa s a bsent 1o r thi s meetin g.
Mot ion: T o app rove th e Ma y 14, }0 13 \V aler a nd Sc 11 cr Boa rd ~li11111c s a amended .
MO\"Cd. \\'oudwnid Seco nd ed : 11 ,,hc ni h1
1\1Pt1 11 a: pro\'ccl unanimously .
u
}. GU EST: JO I; TOM WOO D MART rN & WOO D.
ME ADO W "REEK RESCRVO IR HI STORY .
Jnc 7 om IV ,1od , Wat er Engin eer of Mani n & Wood . and as soci a1 c Cra,g Lis appeared 10 d iscuss
the Me adow Cr eek Rcs rrvo1r h1s1ory a nd 11 s' 1111 po11ancc 10 lh c C11y u l l nglcwo od 's wate r
supp ly sys 1e111 Al so di sc ussed was !h e co 111rnc 1ual rcla1ionship 10 Den ver Wat er an d projects :11
Meadow Cree · .
The Board reccive<I n copy o f, "A H is1or y o i the Dc vcln pm cttt of En glewond'~ C.nh in-Mc nrlnw •
C.rt·ck Sys tem by Joe ·1 om Woncl ,"
~I
J. BOW MAR SAN ITAT ION DI STR ICT CONNECTOR'S AGREEME NT .
Bo w Mar ani t:.l li n Distri ct suhmillcd n standa rri co nn ector's agreement for receivi ng and
1rcH t i n g sewage 1rrmsm i11 r rl hy the Row Ma r Di st r i ct. Tl1 crc arc :-ipp roximn l cly 'l J ta ps :rncl the
di -:.tn rt will crm 1111 ue to own and 11 1c11 11t :11 n th e se we r ma ins The Ci t y Alt omcy's o fli ce has
r cv1 (.'we<l an d approved the s ta11dani Co nn ec to r's Ag reement.
M o tio n :
Moved :
Reco mme nd Co unci l ap pro val of th e Bow Mar Snn)1111i on Di stri ct \V:.i stcwntcr
Connc ctn r·s /\b'T Ccmcr,t
~:1,;co11 dccl : Penn
rvto1 irn1 pa ssed u1wn 1m ousl y.
~I
,1. ENG L EWOOD WAT ER CONSE RVATI ON PL AN 30 DAY PDA T E & OUDGET .
Tom Dn.:nnan 1 Uti li tie s Engin eer, upl➔a1cd th e L\oarcl o n lhc Wate r Conservation !'I an . ~om mc:nt s
received and bud get .
•~!
5. U PDAT E ON A MENDM I::"' I 11 5 FOR UV l'ROJ E T
Tom Brc11 11u 11 , Ut1htic!i Eng in eer, upda 1cd the 13 ourd 011 lhc UV Proj ect progn.:s::;, nn upco min g
credit fo r Ac.l <l cnth1m HS und the b udget. A credit wil l be fo rt hcum 111g on Adclc.:ndum fJ5 becau se
a 1racc r study wa s fo un d lo be 110 1 11ccessa ry Th e pro ject is 70}0 con stru cted wi1h a ta rge t
cu 1nplcti o11 dnt~ "fOcte>b c,. 20 13 .
~;
6 . MS4 STO RM\VA T ER PERM IT Ets:GI.EWOOD l'U0LIC SCHOOLS .
The Board di scussed having tl u.: Englewood Pub li c Sch oo ls ob tai n a scparn tc MS4 Ston n wntcr
•
Pcm1it. With a pcnn it separa tion, any storrnwa tcr vio la1io n fr om an illi cit di sch arge by eith er •
p a1 ty wi II l lU I bc n:nc.:t..:teJ Ull th ~ uther c 11 ti1 y.
• f'hc Dire ctor of Utili 1ics and the 1t y Mnnnger wil l d iscus s o tai111ng a 1 4 Permit with tl1c
Su pe rin tende nt f Eng lewoo d Pub l ic Sc hoo l .
•
•
Moti on: To no1i f) Engle wood J>uhl iz Sc hoo ls 10 11rply fo r n scpnrn 1c MS4 Ston nwa tc r
P t;n lll t.
Moved : Ke lls Seco nde d: Uurn s
Mo 11 on ap pro,ed unanimou sly.
~-
7. UOA RD A PPRE I AT ION NIGi-iT M O DA Y . .I NE 24, 20 13 .
There wi ll be .111 Eng lew ood Boa rJ and Co mmill cc a pprcc i:11 ,on n:ghl on Monday . J unc 24, 20 I)
be gi nnin g al 6:00 in ih c C it y I !a ll ,um111 un 11 y Ronm.
The me eti ng mlJo umcd at 6: I O p.m .
Th e nex t Engl C\\0 cl Wa ter 13oartl mcc1ing will he Tu esda y, Ju ly Q, 20 13 .11 5:00 p.111 . in th e
Commu111t y Ucvc lopment Co nfer ence Roo m.
Ke spcctfol ly subm1 11 cd ,
Ca thy Ourr ngc
Rcconi 111g Secre ta ry
•
•
Absen t :
Al so present :
WATER & SEWER BOARO
MINUTC S
Ti.:E SOAY, JULY 9, 20 13
Oakley, W ign ins , Habenic ht, Waggo ner , Moor e, W oodwa r d, Burns, Ol so n , Lav
Pen n
None .
St u Fonda .· Di1 ector a l Ut1h1 1es, Vasser Ah ouais h -C1tv Eng ineer and Jo hn Bor k
-Ut iln ic , M;i n.1 ee r
l h me ,,1 ::-:a wds ca ll ed to order 11 so, pm .
!@J I
l MIN U l l ~()f JHE JU L ll ,2 UU MlEl1N G.
The Boar d appruvrd lh f' M in 11I e-. nf th P l une 11 , 70 1 ".\ W;i,te r Rn:rn1 M Cline
Mot ion . T app ,ove lil t' Ju n~ 1 1, 20 13 W1J lc 1 dll<.l St!w~1 Sutsr U Min ut ~!:,
Moved . Habe nic ht Seconded : Oak ley
M oti on ap p ro ve d u nanunous ly.
~;
1. BI G OR Y CH[D: DRA INA GlWAY ST UDY .
M r Uave Hen d ers on , o l t he Publ . W o rks De pan m ent, appea red be lore t h e Boa rd 10 re view a request
lor S l2,000 for (nglewood 's po n io n o f th e Big Dry C1ee k Drainageway St ud y Mas t e r Pldn i n111 ated by
the So utheas t M eI ro Sto rmw at er Au Ihnri Iy
The st udy is fo , idl.'11 tify i11 g !:i to, rn fl uw!:, fo r futur e lmpro vemti n l!i , ared~ need in g sta bll l1a tion , floo dp lai n
man agemen t tor fu ture deve lopme nt and new mappin c of fl oo d ha,a rd areas Staff is requ es tin g
S 12,000 be ap prop ri at ed froni t he Stormwa t er Utili 1v Fund
Muth.111 : To approve fu nding [nglewood 's sha re of the Big Dr,· Creek Ura,nageway ~tuay fr om the
'itn rmwa tPr Fu nc1 in t ne amoun t n f $12 ,noo
Pen n Seconded; M oo re
Moti on approved u nanimoti !ily .
!~I
3 ENGL [W000 2013 WAT EK CONSlRYATI ON PL/IN .
r .,1r Abo ua1 sh rr•v1f'wec' t e f,na l dra ft or th e LOB W a 1c r Con ser.ii1t ,,m Plan . I h<' Ho,11 rt Pv;ilu at 0 d
com ment s r eceived dunne 111 90 -d ;,v rev 1Pw r>rnnd Th,. rPrornm rmlr111,ml', i;11b1rnttP ri will no t chance
rh e ?)(I1,tmc clra llP<i w,,t f•r c0 11 '-Prv;i1Io n pl~n , h11t wi ll hP inrh,d crl in th e ~ppendix and cons id ered fo r
lrnnlenw nl ;l l mn nvPr tt1 e n i:111 I l1 vp YP~r, Fnr,ll"Nond 'I', rrspo n ses to lhe co mm Pn t s r eceive d will bo
1nr lm1t.'cl 111 t h e appen d ix. II wa s rccomme nd E•d that t he re sponses be publishe d in a future issue o f th e
Pipel ine
Motion : To r eco mmend Council ~pproval o f the 20 !3 Englewo od W at er Con serv ation 1,lan
Motion : Bu rns Se conded:
Motion ap r11 ov1 ·d u11 <111i111 o usly
"@)
4 . CO LU MBINE W/ITER /,ND SANI TATION DISTRICT CON N [~l OR'S AGRE EM ENT .
Sa n it ary sr.wcr servi ce 1!; pr ovid ed to d istrict s out ~idc of t he En&lcwood co rporate bou11d.1ri c5 th rough
the !.tm1d a rd connector's ,:ig r ~c ment. Co lu m b ine \V Jtc r ;rn d Snni t:i tion Dist dc t wi ll co11titluc t o o wn the
linc5 an d wi ll be r esponsible for cap11 al improvement s in its sy5te m. The Ci t y Attornc\•'s o ff ice has
rev iewe d a nd ap prove d t he s t .Hlda rd Connect o r·~ ~greeme nt
Motio1 1.
Moti on :
To I ecorn rn end CuunLil dµµrovul uf t ilt:: Cull,mlJmt! Wu tcr d iH.I Sd r1 1tdtion 0 1.!.t rict
Cu 11 11cllor \ Ae r ceme nt.
l:i u,ns I ay
Mot 1nn apprnvrc1 11n~111111ou ~ly
•
•
•
•
•
•
s . VAi.i EV SU PPLE M ENT U2 2.
/\ request was m nd e by the Vall ey San itatio n Distnct rep re se nting t he o wner/d eveloper , ML/\T L Family
LL LP for inclusion into the Va lley Sa nitation Di st rict. Supp lement U22 is fo r an area approximately 3.5 3
dL rt!~. Th e w n i11g p e r Ar dµc1 l 1oe Co un ty i~ 1·2, Ge neral Cu111n1~1 ci al /ln dus t r itJ I. Th e µruposeLI u se o f t l ,e
pr o pe rt y ,s for an office/war ehous e w it h veh icl e storaee . MLATL is con nected to Ra lph Sc homp
Aut om o tr ve . Th e pro perty is locat ed near W . Pri nceton 1'I. a nd S. fed era l lllvd . with an ad d ress o f 4 300
S. Federal Blvd
Motion : To recommend Co uncil approv al of Valley Su ppl eme nt #22 .
W·oved : W aggoner Lay
Motion aµp ,ovcd u nan imo sly .
L~
6 . 43 4 •1 S WASHIN GTO N -ILL EGAL WATER TU11 N-ON .
Th _ Boa rd c11~ruo;'i,..fl r1 w .i 1er and sewe r ac cou nt at 4 344 5. Was hington . T he owne, has been repeated ly
t urn ed o ff fo r no n-paym ent and has b ee n turn1ne the w.1 t er back on t hem selves Ci t y Co d e do es
prov ide au t hority to dig up in t he st reet and d isc onn ec t at the co r po rat io n !>l op. Th e Bo ard
reco mmended that st aff check t he Ut ili t ies Dep artm ent le ga l po sit ion nnd opt io ns w ith the Ci ty
Allo,ney. M !.. O l!l un dir~l'..tt'd Stdrf 10 go o u t t o th e p rnµ~rty w it h lhe Englew ood Im p ac t Tea m to
determin e reas o n for non-payment Opt ion s t o diggin g up t he stree t to d i scon nec t w ere dis cusse d . Th e
Board wi ll be updatrd at a futu re mee ting.
Ji m Woodwa rd left at S:4 0 p.rn .
fJl i
7 EAS EM(Nl'VAC AT ION -500 1 S.BROA DWAY .
Th e new pr o perty ow ner , Bro ad be ll LLC, 1s requ est in g En glew oo d's vaca ti on of ab and o ned ease m en t s
o n the west sid e of their propert y at 500 l S Broa dway . Th e ease men t s were dee m ed 11 0 1 necess ary by
the Ut il it ies Engineer to serv ice t he ex ist ing improvement s o n the propeny. Th e terminati o n of th is
ease men t wil l fa cilita te dcvclo om ent of th e propc rtv .
Motion :
Move d :
To re comm end Coun ci l approva l of the vaca t io n o f the ab and oned ut ilities c.1se m en ts at
5001 S. Broadway fo r Broad bell llC.
Wa gg oner Se cond ed : Oa kl ey
Motion passe d una nimously .
·~ 8 . MS4 PER MIT WITH AR APAHOE SC HOOL DIST RI CT l
The Board re ceive d a w py o f lhe memo to Gary Scars dated Ju ne 19 20 13 rega rdi ng not ifying t he
Arc11M hoe School Distri ct li l o f the one vea 1 not ice to apply ror its own MS4 St orm water Perm i t. ;,.,
m eeting w i th The Direc t or of Ut il it ies, t he Ci ty M anage r an d th e Arapaho e Schoo l Oisi ricl 1; l is se t up fur
Aug ust 1 ~.
f~~
9 . SU PRE M E CO U RT RULI N G -LAWN m RI GATION RET UHN FLOWS
The Colorado Sup reme Co u rl ru led aga im,t E11gl t'woo d in t he law n init{a t io 11 retur n fl ows iss ue . Stu
._o n d;:1 di 'i cuc;spd how t he ru lmg affect s (nglewood's wa ler rig hts.
Adj n urncd 6 :00 p .m .
Tile ne>.l Eng lewoo t.l Wt1 te 1 Boa ,d mee tin g wi ll be Tliesdav, Augu st lJ, 20 13 a1 ~:00 p.rn . in t he
Cornmunl ty Deve lopm ent Co nr ere nce Ro0111
Rrs pPCtl 11!1 y c;11 hmit1 e <1 ,
Cathy Bu rr ag e
R1:Lo1 J inn Ser., eta rv
Pleas e no t e: If you have a disability a nd need a u,c ili a ry ;1id s or serv ices, pl ease notify the City of
En g lewood (303 762 -2636) a t le.1st 48 hours in advance of when se rvi ce s are needed .
•
•
•
•
•
•
RD[N /\NC E NO
SE RIE S OF ~O 13
RY AUT HORJTY
C l 'NCIL B U,L NO . 44
IJ\'fR ODUCED BY COU~C ll
MEMHFR
A BU. FOR
AN ORD INANCE A lJTH RIZ ING A1' !NTER GOVERNM ENT'<I. WAS TFWATER
CONNEC fO R 'S AG RE EM E T BETWEEN BOW MAR \V ATFR A 0 SAN ITATIO
DISTRI CT AND T HE CITY OF ENGLEW OO D, CO L R.A I)()
\VH E REAS, the C ity of Englewood owns and o perates a SC \\:tg!! sy!-lem , inclu di ng n scwa1;e
trea 1mcm :,lont wlu ch is Jo int ly ownl'd ~nd o perat ed w i1 h the.· C11 y of r .itt \e ron known as th e UE
\Vn .s 1cwntcr Treatment Pi nnt (\V'wTI'); and
Vll lEREA S. the LIE \V\VTP p:o vidt.!!i s:mitnry sew er serv1ct.· to d is 1r:c1s 011 10::,d e nf the
En glewood corpormc bouadari ~:. 1hrous b :1 stt1nd a:-d ..:o nnrctor' s ag ret:ment , :m C
\Vll.EREAS , the Bow Mar \V nrer o.nd Samtn 1ion Di strict desi res to u-ilm.· th e l!E \V\VTP or
LI cat111cnt o f the Dis lri ct 's sewage, and
\VHEREAS, the Dow Mar \Vote r nn d Sam tat io n Di st rict ha s a pproxunate ly 03 mp~; 1rn<l
\Vl-lEREAS, the .IE \V\VTP is sit umcd ph y51c J ll y as to be :1b lc: to receive and treat th t" 1:cwagc
fr urn a •Jesi g1 1atcd area se rved by 1hc Bow Mnr \\later :md Sanitati on D istrict and ~athe red b ) the
Di~t rict':s ~ai11 tru-y sewage: :-.y~t i.:m ; a:1d
\VH E RE <\S , Buw Mat Water an d Sa.mtau on Di stri ct w 1II contin u e to own the lines and will be
resp onsible for t:01p1ta l i11 41 1ovemcnt s dnd maintenance in ll :i system: ru1d
WHER EAS , th e EuglcwuuJ Wa tca and Sewer 0 c ard rcv1 cwccl un d 1cco nunc nded app r v:i l o r
the Bow Mnr Water and Sad 1,1ti u11 Di:sl ri 1,;.t Wast<·w.i 1er Connector's Ab'TC t:1mm t at th e Jur.c 11,
LO I 3 mee11 ng ;
NOW. TIU.REFOKE , BE lT ORDA INED BY T HE C ITY COlJNCILUI· 'I HI:. 'IT Y OF
ENGLEWUUD. OLO RA DO, AS FO LLOWS
Secti on 1. The Lntcr govc mmcnt 3l Ag rcc:11cnt between 1he Cit ~ uf Euglcwo d and Dow Mar
Watc1 and Sam tc1 t1 on lJ1 stnct cnl!llcd "V-las1ew:1 tcr Co nn ec tor 's Ag1c:c:mc:11 t Fo 1 Dis tri ct~" is
hcrcb) approved , a co py ,s anach cd here to as Exhibit I .
Sec ti on 2. TI1c: M:i.yor is auth ori zed to execute an d C ity Ckrk 10 ::me s! a m.I ~cal th e:
Intergovernmenta l '·\Vastc wat er Co nn ector 's J\grecmcnt", for and o n hcha lf of the Engh :wuoLI
City Council .
lntroduc cd , re nd Lr1 fu ll , And passed on fir st readi ng on Lhr i rct r1:ty nl Septcmhcr, :!O 13.
PubiiJ hed by T it le ac:: n 81II fo r nn O rdm nnce 111 th e t '1ty',; nffi ial newspaper on tl1c 6th da v o f
Septem ber, 20 13 .
Publi shed ns a Ui\l t ran Urchn nncc nn th Cit ·s officia l webs ilt: bcg11 111 i t1~ llll th e 4th day of
September , 2!1 11 Jor111n · (1 0) ct ays .
Rund y P. Pi.:nn , Mayor
/\°17T:ST
Loucn'ihm /\. Ell is , L ti )° Clt:rk
I, l..oucrn:.h1a /\, Ell i!:, C11y Cle rk of th e C :ty of l·nglc wC\NI, r n lorado , here b) ccni fy that lhl'
abov e and forego tng i.!; a true co pv ot a HIi i lnr 11n t l rcl ma n:c, 1111ro du ccd , rca rl in !\Ill . 11ml pu ~~cd vn
fi rs t reading on the 3rd da. o l Se pt emh er , 20 11
oucnshin A. El-li-s ---
•
•
•
•
•
•
WAS TE WATER
CONN ECT R'S AGIGEMEN T
F:,1 U1s 1n ets
·~II IS A\JRCU,•t l;N ·:, r.Ulde rnd eni crecl UH ') this ____ dar :.i r
4/!9/2012
Rcv1s 1on
________ ,20_1obeeffrcuvc 11t of ______ . :?O __ , Ly :m
bc 1wcen the Cl I Y Of l:NGLEW OOD, CO I.OR :\DO, a 11n.:.0 1c ipal corporn1100, hen:imi.fic r
rcfcm.:d li.l n\ "..;ily," 11ct i ui; b)• .md thrm1ih iLc; du y cl cc 1cd, qutth fi ed llnd nutho 1i;~cc.. iv.::iyor :inrl
Ctt y Cler,-, ,11 1d th:: BOW MAR W ,\T.:.m. r\.N D SA.NITA rlON DISTRlCI', 3 quJs1 111unic 1pnl
c.:oq>l'll 1'l1on .ind subdl\ is1on o the St.:i·e of Co l:,r.id o, h..::-cmo.ft~r co iled "D1 !.liicl ," a,1rn g by anJ
1:1rcugh 1t:: nuthor.:~C"d Rcp:-cr.entat 1ve.
wrrtsr:SS [Tll
WHeRr-AS, the City own s a11d opt:r at us II sowJ~c sys1 em, indud1n& n St.",vaer. trc.1t m cr.l plant
whi.;h :, J mth owned a,u1 orc:rat ed \\ith th!.' 1:)' of I nt lc:ton. so si tu ated phys1ca ll } a:; tc, be
ab le: to re c1\'C and trca! the sewag e from~ ocs.r,nntcd area served by th e Um n c t :ind gilthcreti by
ti1 e :)mn :.t 's Samu ry~s cwa gc sy.:i tr.-n ; :i nrl
WEERF,\S, 111!-. the ri csirc o:· the Dis trict to u11lm: the lnci htH.:S c,\vnc-d by th e C11 y for the
1rea:mcnt of se•"a gc. nn i. the Cit) 1s willi r.g 10 ~J'\l! the IJ1 sm:t for 1ren t11:cnt 0f !;t:wagL undc,
c:rrnn ccnd111cns.
I ow, rHEKEFURE, fN CONS ID!:fl TION of the pru1111 so, .;11u fo, OIU CI go,;,d oud
ve!u ;,,bh: cons1tlc.ra uc 11 here maf1e1 ~et ;"ur.h, ll i~ mutud.l .y ngr~cd by t!-• ..; pii1-ui .. ~ .:..11 lo.lC't•,.1,•~
·ml· C 11y hc1eby ui,Tcc~ under 1hc cC1n dlt io11s hcrein af,c:-r.ct fo rth, 10 tr eat the scwc.g,~
ong,nn'.ing from the l)1st n ct':. ~ill'..l tory !:ewer ::yttcm w1tJ W1 tl":e area served hy th e
C 1sl~1i.:1 :; nrprovcd ty the C it y :i.n d as 1ndica 1ed iu tb.: c!csc ri pllon rna~bed he-re:10,
incorporcted bc:cm Jud ·nlrhd as "Exh ib i1 r\.''
Tm: Di.:1n c1 spe:ifica tl y flgrct·~ :o prt"v~n , o;rw:lge frmn any arta olhcr lh un 1h.11
d es cribed hr:~r-ir , 1·n111 h"rn~ 010::1.:hw,ec<l i•110 the Hi\11Cl '5 ~urnt:irv SC Wlll'C ~V$1l:m
r1,111 rr.•rr\ !o the C11v s trunk lt nc IH1d to 1=revcm conncc.1ons 10 the j)'S ltm f:om 01 m
nny ,trcn ot her thni th:>st dcsc:ibed hen:u.
ln the~ cµern t1 n of the D1stnct 's ~ao11:-i.y .!.t"we r system, the 01 st nc1 lgrees tt:a t a ll
apphcabk Code p1o v1s 1ons r.nj rJ lt.~ :in cl rci;ul ,1ttons of th e Cny, mc l d11 1i; 11111r-ndrue lll s
1!,cn.·10 du ring the \trm cf th e co mract , shJ II be the mini mum st anch"rrds fur the lJ1 sinc1·s
system ·11c D1stnc1 fu1:hcr ugrccs 10 abde by ti ll ap_:>h cable sla'.c ilncl fe deral l.i ws.
mies, rcgulJt1ons, ,:,r pcr:nits, mcluciint tho:,c 01 the l;nv1ro nmcntn l Prn 1ecuon Ag.:ncy
(the E l'A) as they bccoirc e!fecuvc or 1m p!c:ne:1tcd er upo:i notice fr om th e i1y TI 1c
D1stnct stnll Jn!mm all us e1 s, con1r:ic1 ors ancl s·Jbconrracrnr., uf suc h sl,11 1Jd;ch, 1uh:!.> and
rcgulal :ons upo n in<]\111)' fro m such pcn,u 11s, and slm.1 1 nu t furn ish ,u.y ·nfui m11 t1on
ir.cCJ:1.51St C11 L 1lu.:1cwnl.. lu C1 is rcgual, n ).1a\l l,e.1.hc 1cspo1mbd11 y of the 1s1ri:1 to
obrnm th e a ppl i1.c1.l le 1cqui 11.:11 1c11b f1om the ap pro pnn tc go vc min g bo dy The C1ty sha ll
E
;{
H
1
13
J
'1'
1
n:ti:1110 1 1n m:un1a m and pro vide mfo :ma uon on all n:qdrcmr:nl !<. 10 th e Di stricl , ho wcvct ,
lh:-ci1 y do cs nut gua1 b.1 1lc:: t he acc urn i.:.y ur cu 1nplc tcncs.!. of gov:mmcn: rcf!Ula rions
ot1:c.., thc:11 the Ci ty ':-own :egu ;e.liom.
Rc:;a 1din g the prov ision of sew I sc.rv,cc, th e Cit y'~ peT111 tt rn g rcq u1rcmc nLi; shii.Jl b:::
fo ll ow('(I hy lhc IJ1s tn ct an d m u.,i;crs. All sewer p;1ms, .s pcci fi cativn!I 11.r.d methods r
work w1th 111 the D1:1 tm.:t !>ha ll be :,,ub11.1Hlcd lu We City in \Vnting and apprcw cd by the
Ci1y 1111or 10 an y co r struc1ior. or ll\p u 1 the D1 5Ln cl'5 des ignat ed :i re:i , ~o pcmU 1 d1:i ll be
fim.1 nn ct no :;c r✓1Cc lh.,11 be pro vi ded 10 pro pe r\.}' unt il co ns trirnc1111s i!.ppro ved, ·n
\~nting l;y L'lC Ci ry
The D1s tn:;1 sha ll be rc ~ponsible fo. the µ1op c1 11.oir:tciiil ncc of 11s se wer systc:n i:.nd ~hJI\
rec tify <W) 1,1roh.cm 5 or condi t.1ons which hn·,c been de1c mlln cd ':>y the Di !:U1ct or th\!
C1 ly lo b ~ di.;tnmcntnl to the C it y's trcmmc:nt p1c ~ess or sys te n: Shnu.d tbe City
dc hmnine th:11 nny d15charge ente rs L'i c sewer r.y~t "m cnnuary to upp !1cab le la .vs,
"lrrlmnr,c-~~ •. \lltlute!<.. lt:i, n:~ul at ion:; or pe nnits . the Ci stn ct a}!rtt:~ 1u prw.:cctl .ii vu~i.:
tc ta:{C whatcvi:, law ful nc:111, muy be llt:L.C.!.Sit !f to ;ec.Hfy llfl)' such prJbk.m er
.. 0 1.d 111 0 11.
Tli e City shall have tht" r.gh• w allnr,,t• i::r rv·cr. unrir .. 1h1:; Con tra cr, nnd th e Cny may
rl ery n<irh1 1r11al sr.rv1c c fo! an y util 11y-:d atcd rcf\Scn, but in 110 e vent wil l the Cit)
· ::mur.mc or 1c fo ~::: Hl ty ::;c::rv.cc w1t l:ou. l.;t:U::ic . The City s. I! M\e the ri gh t to d1S ... Olll!Cct
.,cn·ic to ,my arc.'! n1wcxcd to ·he D1.nri c1 w,cn mch .i.nr.c:x:it ion ta ke:: plo cc wi:hc.1 u:
;m or wrncn Cit y op ;.n ov:il.
W11h1 n 01e yr.ar o f th is uiu :·:m n1. the District sb nll prc,vide the Cny with nn est1 mRte of
the nurr.'Jc: of cquivEJ!c ut serv ice: !Bp!. necd cC for 1hc nc:.:t fiv e (.5) yc ai :; uudc i cuncnl
1.t111i11,; and pia nnct..1 bd '.d ou t in :he Dismc1's 1.uca 0:1 sl:-,.v n en Exb.ihn :\ 111~ C1st:1..:1
sl-:nll conti nue to moni1or zo:nnc chan&cs w1thir. iu a1'!11. to estirruur-tis u.p req11 irr-mc:r.1s
and provide th e City wu}. not:l't' of tnp rcri111 ~cm ct11 tr, the ncx L five(.:>) ycu period
wh,ch I me <:hall be ~1ve J1 to the C11 y on cad ar.mvc:mir) da te: or ll l!:i Ag1 e4:.me 111 111 u
:·onn !::li isfoc tory to th : Cuy .
6. The ity m;a y impos e Jnd co licct ,caso nl hle fe es , toll ; 1nrl chargrs , wh ich shal l bl•
urufor:-n J S 10 all 0111sa de-City usc1s for !hr-sr r.,1c :l,; pm·11drri hy the C11 y und :r lh.s
Conm.·c:or s Agreemc 11t
The C.ty :-.h111l bill 1h :; Di)lll-1 use,!:i d1 1t":c.ly fo :-nil rtµphl ,nl.J11,: Cit )' churgcs for ::c:--.1cc3
rcl\rl crcd und er th,, Afl·ceme m Should nn y u?;::r 1101 pay th l: Ctt)', Ulr. City sh:!il bill the
O,c tnc:1 :m d U1 c Di.s t n et shall p,iy 1he amuulll d1 r-I.} Cit) <J.'H hm 1r.rly-i1vc {t.:>) d:iys of
sue ii bd l1113 Th:sc rh,rt!CS a re ~ubJCCI :o ~dJustment hy th e Ci~y :r.>rn tune to 1:me
Whci. :;ucb adjwamcn: to lhcs c cha1gcs ;u c romk, Ilic C11y ~h11ll t,iv~ the 01.s 111c: :·011y-
five (tl5 ) ddy.s fl dvancc: wn tt cll nu ut.c
The i/ ma y b1U :m tl co lle cl ·'D1stn ct Charges " unp sec by the P 1st:,c1s .Na n
ad c.ht 1onal ttem lo be billed Uld rnll r.c1 ['rl ")' 1J:eC1 ry alor.u wah t.hc ily's Trc:a tmcm
ch ;irce arc1 oth er 1c.e"-l he "U1s1nc1 Charg~s " 1ccc 1vc.d l>y l~c Cit y sh all be rc,wttcU Uy
1h: Cuy to the Distrn;t cnm.Ja.H y, lcS!> a;J c1 mou nt cqu ,tl lo lh c Cit y ar:d DISlnc: cha rec s
whi r.h r•:m.1111 cclmq:1:nt r hc D1st:-1ct :;ha ll no n !)• the City o:'any ch .ul gcs in •.he D1stnc1
ch .1 :-gc& 10 be 11n;,o~ed an d ll lc rcnun ance scb erlu lc belrn: Yi ny I II ot e11 ch )t-..a ,
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
Suh;ec: to th, te rms of the Tax payer 's Bill of Rights (TABO R), ,ho tc ,m of tl11s
/l.g ree mcn1 is for o p~ricd of lhrec (3) years fr om Lhc ,fa te of cxccuti ou and autorru ticn ll y
rcnewrd for six (6) subseq uent three (J) yea 1 p:.11orls wu:ss t:ithcr i:any gives a
rnu um um of six (6) m r.ths written :10t1.:c, dunng wh.lch ur:1e the D:mrict agrees Lint all
cffi1..en t produced from tnps w11 hin the D1:;tnc1 sha ll not be m violation 0 1 any !ed=ra l,
s1,1 tr or Cny laws, rules or :eg ulatio;,:;, or any 01he:-app li cab le govc :nm cnt a. rcgu la\1 ons
o~ tJ-:c pcnnit s und1;1 wh.ch the Cny opcrntes m sewage tr eat ment system . l11c C11y
agrees , durn1g t 1c 1crm hereo f, to treat sa iJ cf!l uent and to mam tain adequate fo c1Jit1cs
tor trca hng the s a □c
·nu: Dhitrit.-t ng 1t.:c ~ llu,1 n will ma mtn,r., a: as own c~;,c:nsc ull lu1e:: now owned nnd
ope111t ed by the Dis tn c1 , n being spec ifi enll:,-og 1cl•J Uu~I the C u y .!.ilmmcr no
1~ponr,1bility shm..ld .t:lj' or lhe Disuic1's hn:s become c logged , dam:,p.cd, or reql.1re
ir.n 1n 1eu:wcc The J1s 1r.c1 ihn\l, 1f it deems neC':S.iDJ)', 11011fy it -. user-: l"l 1he t)1<:l11 c1',;
pm :durc to n:mcciy scrv1c: dLSrupllon
Q T~t· Ctty i; p~O \i dm g nnl)• ~r.w agc: trcatm::nt sc1vi ct: anct , pu r3ua11: thcre lr: :my pc mus
u•nricnta l lo the m e of' Lie C1 y':> sc·.i.1.1g~ .mes i.;ha .1 b~ govc m cd only ~y th Vi 111ri1 ,•1du:il
Con tri,ct wi th tl!c.: D1s:n c1 ;md the Cny :iocs not, b:y 1lus Cm111ac l, offe r tren trnc:11 !.Ci VIC-.:
crc.c·pt 1n stn c! acco ·ancc with I.he tcm)S hcreo : Thi s Cortract dors not of1cr, and sh.1!1
not be cons trued as offering, sc wilgc treatm~nt ~c rv1 oc to the public ccncro ll y or to Jny
n1ca ou.s !d c the limm of 1h~ Dliill ic1's :;ervicl! area descnbcd m Ed.ibn A
T :11s Contract may not b:: a~.cab'TIC:d , so ld o:-11t1nsfc::rrcd bv the Di!t nct w 1thot11 the 1:11y·s
wnl!en consen t.
11 SUot:l d any federal law, ;ulc:1 pcrmll or n.:~u leuura u 1 :thu uld a decree o r ordc: oi ,1 :;oun
render vo irl or unenfo:-ccab lc nny provm o.1 of tl.1:t CIJ1 11J :J.cl , in whul or 1~1 part, lhL
rcm amdc:1 shall rt.:1:-1<1111 i:1 fu ll fui ,.;c dHd effcct.
12 The. :)i~t1 ict .!i hd ll c11fo rc : 11 ,, Agree ment and Gl!Ch of it.5 tcnn:; and cond111ons "'"· ur ,Ii::
nrca :kscnbcd m "Ex.t11b11 11 " Thi! ::>1:.tn;:1 !:h~II rcfo.:;e to serve.: a. use r or pol':r.l1dl u ,,_r,
disconnect th!': :;en ic e of any u:;c , pur:aIan1 10 nppropria.f ~ la1 ·1 or r;i ·e otlwr :iµp1C'p1 · Itr•
:imon 1:1 the l:vc nt of·
IJ
b Any v1ol ;non o:-nJnc ompl.nn:c JV su c.h u5c· with lhe te n ns cf t:·u s A~ct1.1:111 ,
A.Jw v10\a:1on o:-11011co mpl.r.11:e JY ~\l (h 11scr vmh the np p.1cablc li'!.ws , ni lc.i;,
pcrmit'i or rcbtt 1lou :ms or 11.l :; C11y , t~.c Um ~ed St,i tc5 govcttm:nt , in clud111g the
CP A, the Srn1 c o f Co l 1acto. the Dt;panmcm or ;!calth, or other law , rLl c, :•cnmt N
.ipphc:ib lc rcgu lnll on
Co nl 1n•.1 cd bn: .. 1ch of tm s Agrccm:nt by th ~ Li 1s~ncl ttndlor 1ts users sh.iii be cons1dcrcd
cause rnr tne L 1ty to lcn'ltnlte .h..s Agrccr.u:r.l Sh'.'l ul d 1he. D 1~u 1.1 fo 1J to p1uu µt ly
1c:11fy .:: b1cach of any p,ov:sions 1d enrificd her:1 n. i1Ctc1 notice t.1t1eof. 1ht; Ci t y mn.y
ta,c such steps am l (.J o ~uch work m, 11 d1:c1J1::, uc ::e5'SiU)' to enforce 1h1s A greement
111:ludu.g i1 11u"uon <\lld spc 1.1 fo .. ,i!ly .i. nght 10 mJuncu on or :;pccific pcrfonn~cc agc.i nr.1
tl 1: D1~tnc..: cu t1 uy of it s J! ,1~ 2s 1~ necessary lO pro tcc.1 the City·; sy!ilem and opcro1 1on:: .
Ti le ;,rcva1l in e [l llflY sb.ll ! De cnmlt:d to cxp ens:;s acU cos ts of sua, incl uding attorne y
fees .
! 4. Shodd ,norc tllan on e di>t-ir.t he r.o"'lncc1 cd to o sewer line , al 1 disuii.;1:, 011 thc !.eHet lir e
v.,h o ,ur. i:, b:-ea ch of th:s Ag rcc mcni :;t,a] b:; jomtly and severall y h.ib lc fo r 1\1\:,' :a.ch
b:-cact: o f tlus A~rt:c 111c:ol 2.nd cn ch suc:l 1islf1Cl :::hnll 1rnmcdi:n cl y, i ft er no11cc. ru1:fy
ony prob icm or co nd1t1 on dc;trirn rnt:tl 10 ·he 1rcn 1mr:n 1 pro cess ari sm~ w1 :htn hs l!guJ
hound anes Whe n more lh:rn one distncL !S connec t.;d m a sc:we r lmc, an d the C1 1y
dlscovl.!."s cmy v10Ja t:011 of 11lc tc11ns oi tt-Js co1mcctor's ogrcem e.nl , the Cit y !.hall r.ot b:-.
1 equ :rco lo pro,·c whic h d1 !itnc: 1s a: fnu h :mt sh:i lt nu ke av1i 1lab le to a l l suc h aficctcd
districts nil mfonnaf il n rlr.v cl opcrl or accurr ul atcc..l by th e Ci ty pt.:rt aH 1U11~ tu sue.Ji lJ 1c.1c:l.
No:hmf c.ontn incd hc rcm sha !I preclu di.: n c\ei m for 1nd::mn..it y or comnbu:ion by •mr
D1Hric 1 a ;u mt HUolltc 1 District co nnected 10 n co mm :>n sewer line C RS-11-71. I 11 S,
.is 11 mcnd:d :;tnll covc m the pcrce n:.1g c or hab1l1ty of ;my d istn ct un i\ :ommo11 sc~n
lt nc m th •: C'-cn t th": r 11 y c;r.ek/:: to impos e licbilH:,' ba sed upon 11cglig c11c c 01 fa\..lt .
! S 111j :. C.:on u nc t sha ll not b ~ u:i cd J!. n legal dcfcr.sc or prohibit inn ;o rhr. -n.1 ncl:1 1cry
cor.~oh d:it inn of facilt ti e:. h)' ,~it her pany 11s nrn y br. rr.qJ ir cd by th e !i.lws uf :hr. Swtc uf
Co lorado of a ll existin g se wer col!c-.:tion :;y:.tc11is or.d fA c1liucs 10 :i govcmmcn:.1! en 111y
C.:I CJ tcd L\J f:!>Su me resp ons 1btl 1ty fo 1 r.ew er .!:trvicc m the area in wh,r:h hntn tJ-r. C11y n11 :J
S:ntc :ir e J part under srn:utory o· co nr:ti t1111 onnl nuthNit}
CITY OF l:~G LEWOOD, CO LOR. .00
, Mayo r
ATJ'CST
•
•
•
r A.NITA'! JON DIS TF.J(. T "AR W,\TER ANDS · BOW,.,·
_,.. r_p ~er -:Gnj
Br~,. )
r, COLO RACO ) ss STA JE O ·~ i )
CO C~Y 0 , !Jf ~~ "' ao, ,, O'l,,,,
fl(. b, 0 ,. -n cth•s ,.2._ · I "tru mcnt 1.1.·a s nc.knowlcdgc The fo rcgorng m ..
"a /.!,., hy
rl offi ci al seal
WiL1r•s ,ny hanri a n Cl ~o/~0 1$-
My Co•nr:uss1on exp ires 3/~
•
•
. ..
P.in eht.iu;r
Pilrk· ...
i;;
"' <:
~
!!1
W Oum cy Av f
'fl' Uu mu fll
.to:11g lry 01 1/1\
.,; g
b I!' WHr:TM Bow.Mn, ; f ... /•~
~,s,•
.;
i,! s
S\ "' "'
/;_'tf'" t = )utu. Ct•
•l' 0 ~· ~ !!1 vn,mplr Pl ~~~ '•~1-,-----w lJnlll n Ave,----.
I!?
~ ..,,.~t9onlfall 'flW11J()nlH&1 !
~••fomrt1c111d
Prosu.,,C'f
WkM1wood()I
,,
I a ..
N~a!it61Pit!k• a, ·f < o; Q.
~ Ci
WluPu A\'C' .. s _,,, ,f
f s -,l 0
"' Wlemplt'PI ~Y, ~ •' ., Wuri iof\..,.
W Waol;ll n Trail 01
c-• 4 ~-,,,~ c,4, .,,
~-( ..... 4-»o..,
'•
'· W bd1cvicw Pl l'!•\ c.,
Hiirlow · C.
w 11111 :rnk r1 Ylt::.r PMk i'.'
"n ·
"' C V>
~ f ~ ,n ;!!,
"' < "
*Grand Avt
WMonmoutt,
SI Jllll1Cli
,~ Prc,h ytc,
C:hurch .
• COU NCIL CCIMMUN ICAIIO
Da le Agcndil Item Su bject
~e p tcmb cr , 2U I l 9 cl Ii Columb n t: \Na 1er and Sa 1,i1 ,111 un
Dis tri ct Conn ec tor's Agreemen t
1----------
INITIATED B\' I SIAH SU UK([
Uti 11t ie, DPr,,:·1r 1, Stewar t H. Fonda , Direct or of Ut iliti es
-•-·-
CO UNCIL G OAL ANI) l'K EVIUUS COUNCIL AC II ON
RE CO MM ENDED ACTION
t\t th l'il lul ·i' I], ~0 1 i 111 ee 1tn g tl~c l.1 1,;IL•wuod \V ,lt c·r o1 11d )c".,eor Bo,ird rC'c.o mm cnd d Olm 11 ~1pprov.1 I ol
1h Colu m inc VV ,\lcr ,incl , ru t.:1110 11 Dbhll I W .h lf'\\J le r Connecto,·~ Ag,~ 111 nt.
• IIA CKGROUND, ANALY SIS. AND l,ITl:RNAT IVES IUENT lflf-0
•
~;rni l ,11) ,Pwrr ,;rrvicP ic; rrn1 •,f:prf in d1,1ric1 s r 1J1,1rl 0 1 ll"IP rng lr,,,ni,cf co rpor.1:e bo1111dar ie!) 1nro ugh the
qa d,11d n nn e c 1or 's .,grPc m ent ThP Litt le1o n/Fnulf:.\•.n,1d v\1;-1 ,1P,,;uµr T11~,11rn,.nt r l,rnt ic:; .1h1t-.1n rf>C<'iV<'
;rnd tr a t se\\JSP lra nsrmtted by ,·.1rious d is tricts . The J.ll <\c h ed ,1e 1ec .1ent Jddrt:~!ies lh is. se,vin:.' wi lh :he
d 15 t1ic t th,)l own!> .m d m .. 1m1Ji11 ~ the sewer mJin~.
In the o lurnbme Wa ter a nd Samli!.ti o n Dis tncl th e re M C )3b tap). The Co lu•nb1 11 c-\Valer and S,:mita ti o n
btr11.1 \,111 L'.1 n 1in ll c t ow n the lmc!i c1 11 d "ill be responsible fo , capital i1npr oi.,cme11 ts in ,ts sp tem. Tht:
..illt1 Li1 ·U 111...1µ )hU\\!> the u lu1 11 bi11t.• \l\',1 tt:1 dll d 5.rn it .. 11 1 n 1s t1ic'1 bnu n da ri"'\
FIN ANC IAL IMP ACT
U ST OF AHACHMFNTS
V\111111 <'~ frnm Jul y q , :>n 1 ·i W,1tN ,ind t;pwflr lln;u d m r r ll ng
Propo,ed Bill for ,1n O rd inan ce
I
•
•
~~! Pr ese nt :
Also pre sc nr .
WATER & SEWER BOARl'
MI NU TE S
TUESDAY , JU LY 9, 20 1 1
Oakley, Wiggins, Habenicht , Waggoner , rv anr ,'. \Vocdward, Burns. Olson , l.ay
PPn n
Stu Fo nda,• Di recto r of Utili ties, Vasse r Aboua1sh -City tngmec r an d John l.Sod:
-Ut 1ht 1es Manager
t 11e me e ting was cdll ed to orde r at 5 :04 p.rn .
J~!
1. 111.INUHS OF TII[ JUii[ 11 , 20 1 3 Ml ETI G.
Th e Board approved the Minutes of the June JI , 2013 Wa ter Board Meeti ng.
Motion : To ap pr ove the June 1 1, 2013 Wate r and Sewer Board Mi nutes.
Moved: Habenicht Seco nd ed: Oa kley
Mntinn ,1rprovN1 un a11 1111o u~ly
H
I . UIG IJ RY CRE EK IJRAINA GEWAY ST UDY
Mr . Dave Henderson, of the ~ublic Works Depa nment , appeared before the 3oa rd t o r eview a reques t
for S 12 .000 fo r Englewood 's portion o f the Bi g Dry Creek Dra nageway Stlldy Master Plan initi ate d by
the So uthea st Me tro Stormwate-r f\l1th ori1 •1 .
The stu dy is fo r iden tifyin@ storm flow s for future imp,ovement s:, areas nee ding st abi lization , fl ood pl a ii,
manage ment for future developm cnl and new mapping of flood hoza rd are as. St aff is reques li ng
$12 ,000 be appropriated from the Stormwale r Utility Fund.
Mot i on :
Moved :
r o approve f u nding Englewood'c; sha re o f t he B15 Dry Cree •. Dra inagcway Study fro m the
Stormwaler Fund 1n the amo un t of Sl2,000 .
Penn Se l ond ed rvuo re
Mo·,on approved un ani mousl y .
~1
3 . LNG L[WOOD 2013 WATER CO NSERVATION PLA N.
M r. Abouu i sh re •,iewed t he f i na l dra ft o f t he 20 13 Wa t er Conse rw11 ron Pla n . !ht• Aoil rd rv..t lu;;t p
r o n m ents rPrr1vrrl <lunnc lhP 90-,fay review period The rC'commcnd at ,ons subm1t1 cd wi ll not c hange
t he ex 1st ins drafted wa t er conse rvatio n plan , but w ill be included in th e append ix ,111d cons idere d f or
unplcmcntation over thi: nex t five ye ars En glewood 's respon se to the commen ts received will be
rncluclc d in t h ~ dµµc m.l i x. It WtJ> rcLu 111n1 endcd t hat the re::.µum,1..•!> be published ind f11 1u rc iS'-UE o f t he
Pi peline .
Motion· fo rec ommend Co uncil approval of t he 2013 Fn glcwood Water Conse rva t ion Plan .
Mot i on Burn ~ Seco1ded : w,g~i ns
Motio n approved unanimously.
~;
4 , CO LUMDIN [ W/1TCR AND SA N ITATIO N D ISTRICT CONNECTO R'S AGRE[MENT.
Sa n ua ry SPwPr v rvt r P •~ prov1rl ert to ri 1c;tr Ict s o u l su1e n f t hP f-nelP woo d co r po rate bou ndaries thro ugh
t h e stand ard connect or's ag r ee, ent . Columbin e Water and San,ta lion Di!i t rict will co ntinue 10 own the
line!~ iJ nd will be r c -;po n !i i ble fo r cap it JI impr o ve,nent !> 1n 11~ sys l em . he City Atto , ncy ·s office has
reviPwed and app,ove d the st ? -t ard Co nnec tor's Ar.reement
Mot ,on
Mu ti u rl'
l o recommend C0tmc1 I app rova l ot lhe Co lumbin • \V at e r and San i1 a1io n Dist rict
Conn ec t or's AcrPe m Pnt .
Burn s Sec ond ed: Lav
Mot ion appr oved u nanimousl\'.
•
•
•
•
•
•
5, V r.L LEY SUPPLEM ENT 112 2 .
A req uest was made by t he '/a lley San it atio n Dist rict rep rese nting rhe owne r/deve loper, MLAT L Fam ily
Lll.P for inrtuston in n l h P 1Jr1 II Py Sr1 nitrt t 1n n Ois t ric t Su ppl e me n t u:!2 is fo r an area ap proxi mate lv 3.53
acr es . The zo ,,:ri g per Arap ahoe Cou nt ,• i s 1·2, Gene rJI Comm er ci al /Indu strial. Th e pro po sed u se of the
propt'rl y is for d ll o fft ce/wareh o ust' w ith ve hicle ~to r age M LATL i~ co nne ct ed to Ral ph Schamp
Automotive . r he property is lo ca t ed n ear W , Prin cet on Pl. and S. Fe,1e ral Bl vd. w ith an ad dre ss of 4300
S, federal Blvd .
Motion: To reco mme nd Co uncil approva l of Va lley Supplemem :1 22 .
M ov ed : Wa ggon er Seco nd ed: Lay
Motion a pp ro ved un animo usly ,
~!
6. 4 34 l S WA SHINGTON -ILL EGAL WA TER TU RN·ON
Th " Boa rd d isClJs~e d a wa ter and sewe r accoun t a t 4344 S. Was hington. Th e O'Nn er h as be e n repea t e dl y
turned off for no n·payrne nt and has bee n t u rn ing t he wat e: ba ck on thef'Tl selves . Cit y Co de does
µruvide au t hunty lu d ig uµ in the ~tr ee t an d di!.conn ect at the corporatio n stop. Th e Bo ard
reco mm end ed t hat sta ff check the Utilities Depart men t legal po sit io n and o ptio n s w ith th e Ci t y
Atto rnev. M s. Olso n dire ct ed st aff t o go o ut t o the proper ty wit h th e Englewood Im pac t Tea m to
dete rm in P re;i so n fo r non-pay rn e-n: O ption s t o digeine up th e 1aree t to d isc onne c t were d isc uss ed . The
Board wi ll be upd ate d at a fut ure meet ine ,
Jim Woodward left at 5 :40 p.m .
"j~;
7. t ~S EM ENT VACA'I ION-500 1 S BRO AD~,AY,
he nPw pro pPrt y ownP r Bro ad bell U , i s reque st ine Fnglewood'~ v;tC r.t io n o l .:1 h;i ndo ned P ai;enie 11 t s
o n the w est sid e of !hei r pro pe rty at 5001 5. Bro ad•.-:il y. The easement !; wen: dee m ed no t n ecess ary by
th e Ut ili t ie!:i En gi 11 t'tr to ~erv iu:! tl ,c ~it i !)\:ri~ impruvt'llk '11t ~ on t l1c prn per t y . Th t> te 1n1 i11at iu n o f t l 1i!:i
ease men t wil l lac1 ht at ~ dev elopment o f t he pro perty.
M o t ion :
M oved :
To reco mm end Co unci l ;ipprova l o f ,he v,,ca t io n o f t he a h i=\n rlon Prt 11ti li t ie s e11 c;e m e n t c; at
500 1 S. Bro adway fo r Broa d be ll LLC
Wag go ner Sec nded · Oak ley
M ot ion passed un ani mo usly .
~:
8. MS4 PEHM IT Wini ARA PA HO E SCH OOL DISTR ICT I.
Th e Board rec.ei vi:d a co py of l'1 ~ mern o to Gary '.iea ,s r1a t eo Jun e 19. 2U l3 regar"o ;,,g no t ifying the
Arapah oe Sch ool Ois tnct ,: l u ! ~he n 11p year no t ic P 1n ilf>p ly fo r 11~ o .v n M S.4 SM rmw n~Pr PP rmit. A
m eet ing w ith e D1rector 1,1 f L.:11 11t iEJs , the Ci t v Manage r and th e Aripa hoe School D1stn ct #l 1s se t up for
August l S.
~
9 SU PREMl CO URT "l,, It,::; l /lW!< IRR IGII TION RETURN HOWS.
The Co lorado Sup reme Cou rt ru led against (nglewood in the lawn irriga tion return flows iss ue . St u
Fo nda d1sLu S~ctl 11uw th~ 1u li11g ,i Hc LI ~ En glewood '~ Wei t er rights.
Ad jou rn ed 6:00 p.m .
ThP next EnglPwl.,~~, w 11~r Board m eeting will be Tuesday, Aug ust 13 , 20 3 at 5:00 p.rr . In the
Communit y Oeve lo pn vt·, f .. ···1forcnce Ho om .
Res p ect u lly sub,.11tted ,
Cathy 8 1Jrra5c
Recordi ng Sec retary
Please note: If you have a disa bility an d need au•lllarv aids or services, plea se notify t he City of
EneJewood {303•762-2636) at l east 48 hour s in advance of when se rvices are nee ded .
•
•
•
•
•
•
OR r.[NANC'E NO .
Sf tUl 'S OF 2013
BY AU T H RJTY
C'OU~C'IL BIL L NO . 4,
INTRODU CE D BY CO UNCI L
ME MDEI, _____ _
A tllLL FOR
AN OR.DlNANC l' AUT HORIZING AN INTE RGOVERNMEN TAL WASTEWATE R
co:.NECT OR'S \C.RFEM F.NT HF.T\\'l'F:N ('01,l fMFHNE WATF.R At\11 S,\NflX l'ION
DISTRI CT AN D TH E CITY or ENGLEW OO D. COLO R.ADO .
WHEREA S, lhc Ci1y o f Englewood owns and o perates a sc w:1gc s ystem , incl uding .1. scw,,gc
, ~a1 111r.nt ptam whi ch is joi nt ly own ed and ope rat ed with th l! Cit y of Li ll lcton known as th e UE
\\:1 :s lcwm c r T rea tment Pl ant l\\f\VT l'I ; and
W HEREAS, th e LIE W\VTP provides sanit ary sewer servi ce to di stri cts ou tsid e o f the
Engl ewood cr-•1m ratc bo undane s through :1 stan da rd connector's a~rccm cr.l. and
\VHEREAS , the Co lu mbmc \\later and Srm iia 11on Distr ict dc:!strcs to ut ili :~e th t: UE W\VTP for
treat ment of the Dis tri .:-. 's sewage; nnd
WHERE AS , th e Co lu mbi ne \Valer and anita tion Di s 1ric t has app ro x.11na 1d y 336 laps: and
WHEREAS , th e UE IVWTP 1s si111 a1ed phys ic a lly as 10 be a bl e tc rr<e rvc and treat the· sewage
from a des ign ated area served by the Col um bine W;u i:r and Sa ni rn 1i on Di s rict and gat hcrc:l b y 1hc
Dis1ri c1's s:m itnry c:;r.w i'lge sy!a cm; and
\V HEREAS, Co lum bine \Va 1er and Snmt at ion Di !.tri ct will cont inu e to own lhe Ime s nnd wi ll be
1csponsi bk fo r cap it al im p1ovcrne111 s and nrnin tennnce in its sys tem ; and
WH EK..E i\S, 1h c l.:.nglewoo t.l Wn ter and Se we r Uoard re v1ewt:d and reco mmen de d approva l o f
the Columhinc WMc r and S:rnirn tion District \Va s1cwn1cr Connecto r 's Agrecmcnl at th e Ju ly 9.
20 13 mee ti ng :
NOW, THEREFO RE , BE IT ORDAfNED BY T HE C ITY CO UNCIL OF THE C IT Y O F
ENGLEWOO D, CO LORAD O, AS FOLLO'".'S:
ScctiQ.!ll . The Imc rgovemmc111al Agreement bc1wec n the 'it y of Eng lew ood and Co lumbine
Wat er :md San11m1 011 IJ1 sln cl cnt 1t lc<l "\Vo ste wa ter Con necto r 's Agreeme nt l-or IJ 1st n cts" 1s
hereby app ro ved; a co py is attached '1ereto ns Att achment 1.
Se c1i on 2 Th e M:1ynr i i:; :rn1hon1ed to e'H'CUI C ;in<i C'ity Clerk 111 :ll t t:i:;t anrt sea l 1hc
lntergl)ve mm cntal "\\/as 1ewati.:r Co nr,ec 1or's Agreement", for and on bdmlf of th e Eng lewood
Cny Co un cil.
Introduced , read m full 1 and pas sed o n m st re ading on the 3rd da y o f September, 20 I \
Pu blis hed by Ti.l e as n Bil l fo r :m On.hmm ce m th e Caty's ol\1 c 1al ncw,;pape r o n th e 6rJt ciny o f
Sep1em bcr, 20 I 3 .
Publi shed ns n Bi ll fo r an n rdnw.ncc on 1hc il y's o nic1nl "-'eb snc bc~mning u:1 the 4th ctny nf
Sep1cmbcr, ~0 13 for thirty (30) da ys .
Rand y P J>c:m . · \11yll r
ATTE T ,
Lo ucrishia A. Elli s, Cil y Clerk
I, I .oucnsh1 :1 ,\. Elli s, C u y C l rk o f the Ci ty o f Englewood, Co l rn do, hcn:b; cert ify 1h:11 the
above and foregoing is a true co,,y of n 8 1II lor :\II Orchn a ucc u'1roduccd, read III fu ll an d p:1ss cd on
fi rst readin g o n th e .3 rd da )1 o f Se p1e1n ber, 20 13.
Lo ucnshw A cl l!s
•
•
•
•
•
•
411 9/20 I 2
Rc:vi siun
WAS T EWATER
CONNECTOR 'S AGREEMl:'NT
For U1 str1c1s
Sewer Contract No ____ _
Tl-ll S MiRE EMENT, n mclc and en tered imo thi s ____ day of
--------~ 20_ to be effectiv e as o f _______ ~ 20_; by :u1d
bc:wccn the C ITY OF ENG LEWOOP . COLO RAD O, a m urn cip a\ c orporn ti o n , hereinafter
referred to as 11 City," ac tmg h'l and t'1roug !1 its du ly clccted 1 4ualificd aul uuth uri zc<l Muyur and
City C lerk , an d the CO LUMBINE\' ALL EY WAT ER AND ~ANITATIO N D1S11UCT, a quasi -
muni cip al corpo rati on and suhdi v 1s1on of the Stale of Col orado , he reiuafter c all ed "Di stri, 1,"
act in g by and through it s autbonzcd Representativ e.
WffNES SETH
WHER£AS. the Ci tv owns and o pera tes a sewage system. lnclu d in g a sewage treatm ent plant
whi ch is jointly nwned 1nrl opera terl wi 1h !ht' Ci1y of Li tt\cron, so situmed phys icall y as to be
able to re ce ive an d trea t the sewage fr om 3 de si gnated area served by th e Distri ct an d gather ed by
th e D istri ct's sam t:iry -sewage system; and
\\•1·02REAS. it is the desire of the D isLrict to uti l iL..c Lh e fa1.:il itics o w;1t:d by the Ci 1.y fu r rl 1c
trcu.lm t!nt of sewage and tbc Cit y is willi ng to serve th e Distri ct for trea.unent of sewage unc!,r
certai n co nditions;
NO W, THEREFORE., IN CO NSIDERATION o f1h e promis es and fo r other goo d and
va lua bl e con.s id erahon bercina Oer se t fo rth . it is mutuall y agreed by the pan ics as foll ows:
I . Th e C it y hcrchy i\grr.es unrie r th e condi ri ons hereinafte r se t fo nh , 10 fiear the sewngr
origin atin g fr om th e Distri ct's sani tary sew er S}1Slem within the are a serv ed by th e
Di strict as approved by the City and ns indicated in the rlcscri ptioo ntt achcd hereto,
in co rp orat ed here in and m.1Ik ed as "Exhi bit A."
2.
T nc D is trict spec ifi ca ll y agrees 10 preve nt s ew age fr om any aw. other than that
de sc ribed herein , from bemg di scharged mto the lJi stricl's sa mtary sewag e system
conn ected 10 th e C iry's trunk line and 10 pre ven t conn ect ions 10 tl1e system fro m or in
any area oth er than those de sc ribed herein.
ln rhe opern ti on of'lh" nis1rict1s s;mjrnry sewei sys1em, the lli s1nc1 :1grecs th:11 :1\1
applicable Cod e provisions d rul es and regul a tions o f the Cit}, in c luding am endm en ts
th ereto during the tern, of th e C-O ntrnc l, shall be th e miuimwn sum dnrds for the Disuict' s
sys tem . The Di stri ct funhc1 agrCA:s lo ab ide l>) all applicab le st.me and fedcn1 l laws,
rt!ks , ,eg uidli ons, or pcnnn s, in cluding Umsc of the Envirurunenta ! Pro tc:<.:ti on Agtm cy
(the EPA) as th ey become effccu ve or im plemented or upon noti ce from the C it y . The
D1Strict sha ll infonn all us ers, contract0 rs and su bcon tractor s of su ch s tandards . ru les and
regulati ons up on inq uir)• from su ch pe rsons, an d s hall uot fumisb any informati on
mconsisten1 therewith . In thi s rega rd, it shall be U,e re spo nsibil it y of the Di str.i c t 10
obtain t be app li cable requirement s fr n m the app ro pri ale governing horly. The C it y shall
1
1
attem pt to mainta in and proVide iulom1 at1 on on all requ1 remen1s to tb~ Di s1r1 ct ; however , •
tbe City does not gua ran tee lhe ,1cc11r:tr.y or co mpletcne,1:;g of govem menl regul ntions
oth er tha n the ( 'ity 'i; mvn rcgul atmm:
3 }fr 'r\rct mg the prnv 1s1<'ln of sewer ~ervi ce, the City 's pcnniumg requirements shall be
fo ll owed hy the r>imict and its u.ser,;. Al! sewer plans . specifications and methods of
wnrk wi thin the District shall be sub ntittcd •o th e City in wnttng and app roved by the
C ny prior to an y constru cti on or ta p in the: r,1strict's designa ted ttrea . o pcrm11 shal l be
fi n al ancl no service ~ha l I be provid t:<l to prn peil y unu l cu11St1ucticu is up piuvc<l, i.11
wri 1i11g by the City.
4 . 111e Disu ict shall be re.o,;ponsible for the pro per maintcni\ncc of iLS sewer system and shall
1cctify any problems or condi tions which have been dc tem1incd by the Dinrict or the
City to be dctrimt.'tlto.l to the City 's trea tment proc ess or syste:n . Sho ul d the Ci ty
dctcnnine th at any di schu rgc enters the sewer sy:aem contrary to app li cab le l::i.ws,
c,rcli 1UU'lccs, ma 1ute s, ru les , regu lati ons or pc :,mt ::, !.he Distri ct agrees to proceed at once
10 ta ke whatever lawf-u l 1:ncans ma y be 11ecessa1 .. \1 rec'.lify :lily su ch prob lem or
condit ion.
5 . The City sha ll have th ~ ngh1 to al loc:u e service unct cr 1his t nnlrn c1, :ind 1h e L1 ty may
deny additional scrviC'.e fo r :my u ili ty~rcl:ued reilS(ln hut in no event will the City
tenm.nat e nr refuse ~my se rvice without ca use Th e Ci ty shall have t.ht riuh t to disconnect
service 10 any area a.n ncxed to the Distt":ct when su ch !Ulocxatio n takes place withou t
prio r wri tt en City approval.
·w ithin nc yem o f this ag:rt emenl. 1.he Distri ct sha ll provi <l c tli c Cil y wil.h a.ii :sti lllll te of
the num ber of equiva lent service tap !-. uccdetl for the nr:.,t fi ve (5 ) years wi der current
wuing and plrumcd build out in th e District 's area as sho\\11 on EX!ll b1t A. The Di stri ct
shull i;orniuu c to mon.i lor 1.oning changes w1 t.lt.in its arc~ to estima te i1s tap requirements
and provide the Ci ty with noti ce of tap requ irement for th e nex t five (S ) yea r period
which time shall be gi ven to the C ity on each anruvcrsar,· da te of this Agrccmc-nt in •
fonn so tis fo ctory to the C ity .
6 '[be City mny im pose and co ll ect reaso nable fees, tolls and charges, which shaU be
1.U.1ifonn o.s to all outside -City users for the services prov ided by tl 1e Caty under th.1 s
Connectur ·s Agrcemem
The City shall bill th e Distric t users directly fo r all ap?hcablc l"ll y charge.< fnr scrv,rcs
rendered und er th1s Agr l'ement Shou ld :t ny 11ser nol pny th e C1ry, the Cit y shall hill 1ne
Dis trict and th e Uistric1 s hnll ru1 y he amou nt due to Cit y wit hin forty.five (45) day, of
suc.h billing r hese ch;1.rg es arc suhJcct to nr1Jus tmcn1 hy I.he Ci1 y from time to lime.
When such :Hljustmcn 11n these ch~rge1:; are m~ule, the City sh.all give th e Di stri ct fo n y-
five l45 ) d:1y s :1c1v:1ncc v..-ri tten no 1i cc .
The Ci ty may bill and co llec1 ·'District Cha rges·· im posed by the Districis us a 11
addi ti onal ttcm to be bi lled and co ll cxtcd b) we Cit y aloug with the City's Trea uncn l
charge and othc-r fees. n,e "Distnct Chur~cs·· tcc ci vc<l by tl1c Cit) sha ll be, crni tt cd by
tbc City to the District rurnual!y; less an amount eq ual to the City and D,su ict charges
•
which remain <ldi.rn.,ul!'HI. 111 c Di~trict shall no tify the City of any chan ges in th e Dis tnct •
charges l O be i.mpu:,c<l llild L11t: remittance schedu le bc:fore May 111 of each year.
2
•
•
•
7. Subject to the terms of the Taxpayer 's Bill of Rights (TABOR), the term of th is
Agreeme nt iN fo r a peri od o f th ree (3) years from the dale of execu tion anrl aulomallt:ally
renewed fur ,;ix (6 ) .... o"c~uc111 three (3) ye.:ir periods unle ss e itJ1 cr party g1V es n
minimum 0 1 !'b (6) t11 onth.s written noi.icc, durin& w tuch tu11r the O rn tnct a:;rccs that all
effiucn t produced lrom taps wttl1i.n the Di strict shall 110'. be in vio lati on of any federal ,
sta le ' .. C:.) ~,,t; z:, • u1~6 o: regu lati ons, or any other appli cublc governmen ta l rcr, .. ·htF'r.
or ·;,\ r-c:nr .:11 1 ·ler which th e C ity op erat es il s scwege treauncm sys tem . T he City
agrees, ~ .u :r ... L.1t.. tcnn hereof. to trea t said effluent and to maintain adequa t e fn ci litics
for tre::Hm t ,,. · Hm"
8. The Di strict ogrccs tbrh ll w ill ma in tain, at it s own expe nse, all lines now owned and
opeiatcd by the Di suict , n b~iu g sp eci fically agreed Llwt the C 11 y a ssumes no
responsib iluy should any of th e Distri :t"s li nes become ebgged, damaged, or rcq 11irc
maintenan ce . The District shall , if it dee ms neces sary, nr,i 1fy ilS users of the 01stnct 's
pro cedure to rem edy service: d1srJp:ion.
9. The Ci ty is pro vid in~ onl y sewage treatmen t service and. pursuan t thereto; an y permirs
in c ictcn rnl to th e w:e o f 1h~ City 's scwace lin ec. slrn ll be govemed o nly b y this indi vidual
Contr.1 ct with th• Di strict and th e City doc.), cot , b y this Contract, o ffer treatment .i:ervicc
cxccp: in stri ct a1,;co rdance with th e tcn.ns hereof. Th.i s Contract doc3 not offer, nnd s hall
not be co nstrued as offering , sewage treatment service 10 the pu bl ic generally or to any
area oul ::;id c the liuU ts of We Dislril:t 's sen i1,;c arCcl J csc ribcd in Ex.h.ibi t A .
10 . Tws Co ntract may not be assign ed, so ld or tran.sferred by the LJ1stn ct without th e C ity's
written consent
I I. Shoul d ao y federa l law, rule , pc rmil or regulation or should a decre e or order of a court
ren der void ·r unenfnrc~blc :my provis io n oflh.is Con tra ct, in wb ole or liJ part, Lh e
remainder sha ll re main in full force and effect.
12. Tue Di su·ict sha ll c:1Uorce thi~ Ag.1 c::emcnl 2.11d t:ach of it s Lcnns ru1d cunditions within th e
area desc ri bed in "Exh ibi t A." ·11ic District shaU rcfu :e to serve a user or po teo tial user;
disco nnect the serv ice of an y user pursuan 1 to appropriate law; or take other app ropri ate
action in th e eve nt of:
13
a. Non pa rmcm of s uch user of n.n y cha rge m;1rle hy th e Cit y fo r services;
b. Any vio lati on or non co mp liance by such user with th e tcrrr..s o f Lh is Agreement ;
1.:. Any viu lati uu u1 11011i..:u mpliam;c l,y !>uch user with th e appli cahlt: lctw s, rule$,
pcnnits or regulations of the City, the United States government, including the
EPA , the SUl tc of Co lo rado, the Department of Health , or other law , rule , permit or
appl icab le re~'llla t1on.
C'on 1i m1r.d bre.'lch o f this Agree ment by the Dis tri ct and/or it s user s shnll b e consi de red
ca u.sc for the Ci1y 10 tenmnate thi s Agreement. Should the Di strict fa il 10 prompt ly
rectify a breach ofar.y p rovisions id c..,itilicd herein, after notice thereof, t.h e City may
take such step s ru1d do such wurk ct s il <lccms ueccssc1.I)' Lu c11fu n.:-t: thi s Ag:ree111cut 1
in c ludin g l1t1gation and specifically a right to injw1cti oo or sp ecific perfonnance aga ins1
lhc D1stnc t or an y of its users as is nccessar)' 10 protect the C ity's system and operation s.
The prevailing party shaJ I be enu tl cd to expenses and co !:.-U of su it, in clud ing =i ttornc y
fees.
14 Sho uld more than one d1 stn r.1 be cnnricr1cd 10 a sewer Lwc , all districts on the sewer !in<:
who Arc in hrea.c h o f 1hi c; Agreeme nt ~h,dl be jnint ly :\nC scvcrnl\y !table fo r an y such
breach of thi ~ Agreement and each such d1 stric1 sh~ll 1.mmcdir1 tely, a tler no tice, rec tify
any pmh lem or conditi on detrimenta l to the 1re.1 tmcn1 proce ss am;ing within it s legal
boundaries . When mo re than one di strict is conn ec ted to a sewer line, ;md th e r.uy
d iscovers any viola tio n of the terms of thi s connector's agrCt.."TJlcn t: the City sha ll not he
req uired m prove whic h ui s1ric 1 is I fL"ull but shall make avai lab l~ 10 nil su ch affected
dis Lrict~ all inforniation dcvclupt:t.l vr at. ... uiu ulatt:<l by lh~ Ciry pertai.niug to such brcac
NothiJ1 g contained herein sha ll prec lud e n daim fo r imlcamity ur 1..:onlribu tion by any
D istricL ogain st anolhcr Distri ct co nnec ted 10 a conu11011 sewer lin,:. CRS·l3·2 l • 1 I ~ .5.
as amended shall govern t.hc percent age of li ab ili ty of any d istrict on e C.OWlllOll stm t:r
line in th e event the C it y s eek s to impose lin bili ty ba sed up on ncg li gc:11cc or fault .
l 5. Thi s Controcl shall not be used as :1 legal dcfcnt.e or prohib it ion to the mn.ndnto ry
consolidation of fa cili ties by eithe r part y a..r-ma y be requ ired by the la ws of Lhe Stotc of
Co lor.ido of all ex.is lin g sewer collecti on r.ys temr. an C fac1 1iticz to a g vemmc ntal entit y
c reated to a ss wnc re sp0Ds ib1hty for sewer st:1v icc in the ar~a iJ1 whi c h boL:, the Ci1 y and
St.11c ci re a part under stat1 1tory or const1tu tio naJ authori ty.
C ITY OF ENGLE WOOD. COLORAD O
,Ma yo,
ATTEST·
. City Cle rk
•
•
•
•
STATE OF CO LOR.AD O )
LIi.. )ss .
COUNTY or~=--)
The fo regoin g ins:rumen 1 wn s ae 1<nowled gcd be fo re me thi s ~ day of J j. _ , ,
20.!3..,by ____ _ ____ . ,,~
\Vim css my hand iind of!k ifil seal
My Co mmi ss ion expires: ~~Mot,,--
•
•
5
• COUNCI L COM MUNI CATI ON
Dale
Sepl embc r 3, 0 0 13 I
Ag e nda 11 c m I Suhjecl
9 a ii i Va ll ey Su pple m en l #~:!
INITI A TEU llY
I
STA ff SO UR CE
~l r>w;u t H Fo nda , O irPr tnr o f U rilitie~
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
None.
Rl'CO MM END l:D ACT ION
rht; \V ,ll c r and $ewer Ooa1d . a t their July 9. 20'. 3 meetin g, recornrn encl ed Co l rn CI I Jpproval of a Bill fo r ,in
O rd ina nce i:lpprovi ng Va ll f!y Supple ment #2 ~.
BA CKGR OUN D, ANALYSIS, AND ,\Ll"ERN ATI Vt S IDENTIFIED
The (ii)' oi En j\l ewood pro,,ides se w age tr eatmen t 10 a po pu atio n 0 1 ab o u l 70,00 0 pe o pl e o u tside th e Ci l y
thr o ugh contract s w ith numerous c o nnector di str'ic ts. Th e area i s d efin e d b ·1 th e n.1 1u ra l rlr;ii na ge ;rnrl
• e xte nds south a nd east ir o m Br o~1dway to :h e \'alley Hi ghwa y and fro m Ham pde n to Lin coln Ave.
e-.;cl ucl ing I Pi;hl.:rn ch Ra ncl ·. By con t1 ,1C t the C1:y of [nglewood mu~t approvt: any addi tions o f land to be
ser\•ecl by 1h e: Cls u icts . Th t:se are usl1a ll y in-iill sl .a tlon s that .ue wi!h in \\'h at the Citv cons lders t o b e th e
a rea 11 has comm ill ed to serve. Ad e:qua 1e capac ity ha s been provided in th e treatment pbn t to
accommodate all st ch fu ture ir iclu~i o ns .
•
A req uesr w Js made by the VJ ll cy S;-1 .,i l ;-t tion 0 1!.t ricl rcprc!.entin g 1hc own er/deve l oper, MLATL Fami ly
LLLP fo 1 1ncl us1u 11 i1llu lii l! Vdll t:y Sd1dt,1l 10 11 DblliLl. Suµpl t!1111.:11l #22 i~ iu 1 dll dl ~d dµµru xirn a t~ly 3.53
J crcs . l11 e z o ning re , A r,1pahoe County 11 1-2, Ge ner al Co rnme rcra l/l rr dustrra l. Th e p rop ose d us e o f the
properly is for an oifi ·:e/w a,eh o u se w ith vehicl e storage . M LATL is connec ted 10 Ralpn Sc h amp
t\11to motive.
Th e legal is atta ched as Exh ibit A. l r,e p ro pe rty is located neM \/il. Pr inc e 1c,n Pl ~rn d S. r cde ral Oh d.1 vv ith .1
propo serl ad dr es s of 4300 5. Fed eral Blvd .
FINANCIAL IMPACT
None.
LIS T O f ATTAC HMENT S
Minut es from l uly 9, 2013 Wa l er and Se w er Bc,a,d mirnrt es
Pr oposed Bil l for =i n O rdi n.i nce
•
•
•
[~"i Presen t:
AhsPn t
Also pr esen t
WAT ER & SEWER BOARD
M IN UTES
TUESDAY , JU LY 9, 2013
Oakley, Wigg i ns, Habenicht, Wa ggon er, Moo re, Woodward , Burns, Ol so n, Lay
Pe n n
None .
Stu Fonda ,~ Dircc l or of Ut ilities , Vasse r AIJou aish -Ci t~ Eng,inee , dmJ Jo lu1 Bu1.k
-Utilities M anage r
Tne mee ting was ca lled to o rder at 5:04 p.m .
t])I
l . MINUTE S O F THE JUN E l l, 20B MEETING .
The Board appro"ed the Minutes of the June 11 , 201 3 Wate r Ooard Mee tin g.
Motion : To approve t he Jun e 11 , 2013 Wa ter a nd Sewe r Boa rd Minutes.
Moved : Hab cnichl Seco nded: Oa kle y
Motio r\ app rove d una nirn ou~ly.
i~i
2. BIG DRY CREEK DRAIN AGEW AY STUDY.
M r . Da ve Henderson, of the Pub lic Works Dep artment, ap peare d be lore the Boarc l o revi ew a req ue st
fo r $12 ,000 for Eng lewood 's portion o f the Big Dr1 Cree k Ora in ageway Stud1• Mast er Plan in it ia te d by
the Sou1hea1t Metro Sto rmwater Au thority .
T' e study is for iden ti fy in g st orm flo ws for futu re im proveme nt s, areas ne eCing sta bili zation , fl ood plai n
manag Pm Pn t fo r fut 11rr deve lopmen t and new m appi ne of floon ha1;1rd ilreas Sl aff is ,eques tin r .
$12,000 be appropria ted fr om the S!o rmwaler Utility Fund
Mot io n ·
Moved
To approve tun dine En glewoor1'"i "ih iHP o f the Bie Dry Creek Dramagewny tudy rom t he
S1ormwate r Fu nd in the am oun t of $12,000 .
Pen n Se cond ed : Moore
M o t ion af.)pruv ed una nimously,
L~!
3 . EN GLEWOO D 2013 WATER CONSER VAT ION PLAN .
M r . Abu uais.h r ~vicwed t h e fi nal d ratt o f t he 20 13 Wa 1e1 Cons erva 1ion Pldn. The Boa1d eva luated
comments received during the 90•d dy 1eview pe riod . Th e f l!Lom mcndd tions su bmi tted will no t chan~c
th e eios tin g d r;i flpd v.at er conservation plan , but will be incl uded 1n the append l)I and considered f or
implement at io n ove r th e nekt fiv e yPars. r ne lewoor1 's res ponsp::; ro the co m m Pntt. rece 1v ec1 w ill be
i nc luded in l he appe,,dix. It w.is r ecomme nded that the r es ponse s be publish eo 111 a fu t u r e issu e o f the
Pioeline .
M o t ion: To reco m me nd Counc il approval 0 1 the 20 13 En gl ewo od Wa ter Co n sc rv.1t ion Pl.in .
Mot ion: Burns Seco nded : Wi;rn,ins
M o ti o n ;tpproved l 1n;m1rno u sly .
~
4 . CO UMBI NE WATER AND SA N IT ATION DISTRI CT CO N NECTOR 'S AGREEM ENT.
Siln 11ary c;pwe r serv1C1? 1s provided (O d ist ri ct s out c.1de o f the En glewoo d corpor a1 e bound a ri es through
t he st ondard connector's agreem en t Co lumbine Wa t e r and Sani ta;io n Dist r ict will ron111u 1e to own t he
lines ant.! w ill bi:i :-,;:,pon sitle for capital improvement s in it s system . Th e Ci t y Attorney's o ffi ce has
reviewed and ap prove d the st,rnd ard Cc,nncct or'5 As rcement
M o t io n :
To ,eco mmend Counc il ap proval of 1he Co lumbint Wate r an d San ita t ion 01 strict
Co rmect o , ) Agreement.
Burn s "rcnnded : I ay
Mot 1on approved un a1 ·,,,.,ous ly .
•
•
•
•
•
•
5 . VAL LEY SUPPLEM ENT #22 .
A request wa; m ade by the Va ll ey San it atio n Di str.cl represent ing the owner/developer, Ml.A H Family
LL LP for inclusion i nt o the Valley San itation Distri ct. Supp le ment N2 2 is fo r an area approximatel y 3.53
ac res. The zo ning per Arap ahoe Co unt y i!-1·2, Gene ral Com 1m-•r ci al/lnrf11s 1ric1 I hP pro pnsed ,1 se of th e
riropPrty is for an nffice/wMehou~P with ve hicle storace. MLATL is connected to Ra lph Schamp
Aut omotive. The propert y is loca te d near W . Prince ton Pl. a nd S. Fe de ral Bl vd . w ith an ad d ress of 4 30 0
S, Federal Bl vd .
Motio n: To reco mm end Counci l approva l of Va ll ey :;uppl emcnt U22 .
Move d : Wa ggo ne r Se conde d : Lay
Motion approv ed unani mous ly.
IEJl
G. 4 34 4 S. WASHIN GTON -ILLE GA L \Vi\T F.H TUP.N -OrJ ,
Th e Boa d di sc uss nd a wa te r and se we r accou n t at 4 )44 S. Washingto n The owner h.J s b ee n rcp e<1 tedty
turn ed off fol' no 11 -pc1y 111~nl dr 1U li d) ll t>l'11 lurn i11 g tllc wat er back on them selves . Cit·, Co de does
provide authority to d ig up In the stree t and disco nnect at the co rp oration stop. rhe Bo ard
re co mmen de d that sta ff che c~: the Ut ili ti es De partment le gal position ilnd op tions w ith t he Ci ty
Atto rn ey . M s. Olso n directed st af f to go out l o the p ro perty wi t h th e Engl ewood Impac t Team to
determine reaso n for non-payment. Opt ions to diggin~ up th e st ree t tr, disco nnect we re di scuss ed. Th e
Bo~rd wi ll be update d at a fut ure meeti ng.
Ji m Woodwa rd left at 5:40 p .m .
7. Eh SEM ENf VACATI O N -500 1 S. ~KOAIJW.AY
The new prope rt y owner, Broadbell ll.C , is re ques t mg Eng lewood 's vac ation of aban do ned easem en ts
o n t he wes t sid e o f the ir property at 5001 S. Bro ad way . T~e ea seme nt s were deerneJ not nece ss ary b1
the Utili ti es Enginee r to service th e existi ng impr ove ment s on the prop erty . The termi nati on of this
easeme nt will fa cili ta te deve lopmen t or th e prope rt y.
Mo tion:
Moved :
To recomme nd Co un cil JPJ." 1vJI of the v~ci1tio n of th e aband on ed u11 lities P;Vi cmc n t$ at
500) S. Broadv.ay fo r Broadbe ll LLC.
Waggo ner Sec on ded: Oak ley
Moti on passed unan imous ly .
;@
8 . M S4 PEHMI T W ITH ARAPAH O[ SC HOOL DISTRI CT 1
r he Boc1 r d r ece ive d a copy o f the nw mo ,, • G.iry Ser1 rs dated Ju ne 19, 20 13 regardlne n ot1tyine tht•
Ara paho e Sc hool District dl of the one yea r not ic e to app ly for its own M S4 Stormwa er Per m it. A
m ee t ing w ith T he Direc to r of Ut ilities, the Ci ty Manage r and t he Ar,1pahoe Sc hoo l Dis trict tll i s se t up or
/l usust 15 .
!Ej l
9 . SUP REM E COU RT RUI ING -LAWN IRR IG AT IO N RETU RN FL OWS .
f h e Co l orado uprem e Cou , r ru led aga inst En glewood in !he lawn w 1ea tion reIu m flO \\S ss11 e. Stu
rnndrl r11.:;cu '.,r>cl how lt1P ru line r1 ffp r 1-. fnflPwoo cl 's wr11P r ngh 1,.
Th e nc>C t Englewood Wa ter Boa rd m ee ting w ill be Tu e sday, August B, 20 13 JI S:OO p.m . m the
Corn ,un it y Dev eloprnent Con fere nce Hoo m .
Respectfu ll y ~ubm ill ~d,
Ca t hy Burraee
Reco rd ing Secre t ary
Ple ase note : If yo u hav e a disa bilitv and need aw<iliary ai ds o r ser\/i ces , plea.-;e no ti fy th~ Ci ty of
Eng l ew ood (303 -762-2636) at least 48 h our s i n advance of w h~n serv ices are r'lee de d.
•
•
•
•
OKDlNANCE NO.
SEIUES OF 2013
BY Al ffHORITY
COL. CU. DILL NO . 46
lt->TRODU CED BY COUNC IL
ME~IBER _____ _
A BTT..L FOR
AN ORDl)IANCE APPRO Vl:N G SUPPLEMENT NO . 22 TO ·mE VALLEY SAN ITATION
DI STRICT CONNECTOR'S AGREE ME NT \VlTH THE cm ' OF ENGLEWOOD TO IN CLUDE
AODI T\0\JAL LA NO WITfU N THE DI STRJCT BOUNDARIES .
\VH ER.EAS , Va ll ey Sa ni wti o n [)i rt rict ha i. subrn i1u-d n req ues t for incl usion in1 0 V:lllcy
S::mita tion Dh;tric t o f a pa rcel wit h the proposed ll ~C of the propert y as an o ffice :,nd \varch ouse;
und
WHERE AS 1 Supplc 111 cm No . 22 is lot app 1oxi.iua1cly 3.53 i\CICS whi ch is pr es ent ly zon ed 1·2
(Gt:ncra l Cu nunt;n;id/lwJu su·i;.s l) arn.l ~d ill w 11i ug wi ll rc:11arn the scuui.:, a11J
Wl-1.ERE AS , sa id aimernt ioo of th ,~ additional par :el of !and will no: inc rease th e tap all oca tion
10 the V:tll cy San irn uo n Distnct; and
WHEREA ll is nece ssary fo r snid Di stri ct to ar r.ca d Jl s co nt ract wits th e Ci ty of Englewood to
mcluJ e this ad dition al land with.in 1:,e Di stri ct: and
\VHF l<F I\~. the F.ne lewnnri Wat er and Sewc; H1111rd rev 1cwerl anc1 rec:nm mcncied ap 1,rn va l o f
:he Va ll ey S:mitation Supp le,n ent No . 22 10 Conn cr tor's Agrecm ~nt at their Jul y C), 20 l 3 meetin g:
NOW, Tl lE REFO RE, DE IT ' RDAINED DY T l LE c.-rv OL"NC I.L OF T l IE CITY OF
ENG LEWO OD, COLO RAD<), THAT
Sec t:on I rh c 1\gr ei::mc 11t between lhc City of Englewood and Va lky Sn n1t at io11 IJ 1stn ct
ent ulcd "Su ppl ement J\i o. 22 t Connc clQr's Agreement " 1~ here by approv ed.
A co py of sai d Agree ,ne nt JS att ached he reto :is Exhi bit A .
Sccuon 2 The tv:ayor anC: C ity Clerk arc he reby auth orized to si gn and attc.s t. res pectivel y, the
said Agree ment for ,nd on bclta lf o f the Ci ty Cow1cil and the Ci ty of Eng lewood.
lnt~c,ducr-d, read 111 full , .i ud pa ssed o u fir ~:t rc~1ding on the 3rd day of Se r, tcmbt:r, 2013 .
Publi ~hccl by Titl e as ;1 Bil.I lo :-an 0 1 di 11111 1cc 111 the Cit y's o ffi cia l nc ws papc 1 ":: the 6th da y of
September. 2013 .
Puhlis hcd as a Bi ll 10 r an O rd inance o n th e Ci ty's offi crn l website bcginn in1; on th e 4th dn y o f •
September, ::0 13 for tb n y (30) da y,.
k :rnrty P Penn , M "ynr
ATl'l:S I"·
Lou cn shta A. Ellis . Ct1y Cle rk
1. Lv uc11s1, ;\. Elli!'., ity \erk o f the City of l:,n 1t\cwo d, Co lora do, her eby certify th nt lh c
above and f .>1 ~ go ing is o true copy of a Bill fo r nn O rom nnce, introdu ced, rc::id m fu ll. and pa ss ed on
fi r st rcadu 1g ,1:1 the 3rd day of Sept ember, :!0 1 !.
I .our nshrn l\ l~lli s
•
•
•
•
•
SUPPLEMENT NO. _2._2. ___ TO CON NECrQ R 'S AGREEMENT
TH IS AGREEMEN T , mad e and e111ered int o by and be 1wcen the C IT\' OF
EN GL EWOOD , acting by an throu!,h it s duly aut ho ri zed Mayor and Ci ty C lerk ,
hereinafter called the "C ity," and VALLEY SAN IT ATION DfSTR1 CT , Arapahoe and
Do uglas Coun1i cs, Coiu ,ado, here inafter cal led th~ "Di stri ct,"
W IT NF.SSETH·
WKEREAS, un th e~ day of Aµril , !0 19 :;:; the C:ty and the D 1stnc1
ent ered mt o an Agreem ent in which th e ci ty agreed to tre at sewage origi na1in g from 1h e
Di stri ct 's sanitary sewer system w ith in the aren served hy the Di stri c , wh 1c~. Agiccmcn1
\V as renewed by Con nector 's Ab'fc cmcnt da ted ..J..ll.U.U.QtY-11-_____ , '.il!k 1989
WHER EAS . sni d Connector's Aycemcnt pro vide s ti 11 the d1s1n c1 ma y not enlarge it s
scr . i~c .,r ca Wllhou t tJ e wri t1en consent of 1h e City:
NOW, THEREFORE, in considcrali on of the mulual coven ant s and undc1lal.ings herc111
set fu rth, lh c parties agree as fu ll ows:
1. The C i1y hereby consen 1s t., th e inclusior. of certain adJj1 ional area locat"d in
Ar 2pe.h oe Co unty, Colo,ndo , own ed by ...!__see-1,_el=•---,,,--,---,---:,-and m re
fu ll y d,,scnbed on Exh ibit A a ll ached here10 and incorporated herei n by referen ce, m to
Va ll ey Sani,~>io n District. TI1c Ci ty agrees th at said ndd it ,onal area may be served wi th
the sewer faci l11ies of the di strict, and that the Ci ly will rcat th e sewage dis chnreed into
the C ity's trnnk 1;ne from said add itional area , all in acco rdance with the Connec1or 's
Agree ment da ted . April J 8 ,xll 195 5 and Amen d ed
J a n u ar y l 2 , 2(~ 1 989 Accor dmgl y, Exhibit
A referred to in Pa ragraph I of the Co nnect or 's Agrecmenl dated _Ap.riJ_l_B......JJl.55 __ ,
l{k ___ nnrl Amended _..J.1u.1uury 12 19 89 _, is hereby amended 10
include such nddt1 1 no! nreo .
2. Ea ch a nd c cry otbt, provision of U1 c said Con ncc1o r 's Agrccmcn; da 1cd
Arwil_JJL.....J.9S5 anrl .\m enclctl ~r v 12 . ~-sha ll re m ain unc hanged .
1:\/ W IT NESS \\'llEREOF, tl1e panics have set !h eir hands anrl seals !his
____ day of __ _ __ , 20 ____ .
• MLA TL Family Lini i l ~d Li Uilit y Li mited Par lnt:!1'8 la i p
A
C ITYCLERJ<
SF.AL)
ATTEST ·
CIT\' or E:-I GLEWOOD
BY ___________ _
MAYOR
VALLEY SA.N ITA TION DI STRICT,
ARAP/\1:JOE: COUNTY, COLO RAIJ 1,)
~, j'y,_ J /
0 y. /;£, 'fa ~,.-J'
~j~~ SEciifr-:RY
(SE AL)
•
•
•
•
ne mffl•& pany ~•cn:br ORDf.RlD ~-GRANTED / •• .,..,1, • '"PY ofd,I, O"'u., .,, pn,
M p,rUcl wbo hH: Clltend &II
APPROVED 1ppana,.l1lt,i,-wtthlolOd.yt .
_, t1,, 4w ,r tllll onler.. Jot,n L V.,,"'8<
'---,--~----~'-----------.-i llia'l'id Col.II Judge
D!STRJCT COURT, ARAPAHO E. COIJN1V,
ST A 1t: OF COLORADO
Court Address: Azapahoe CoWlty Ju,,'li ce Ccnlcr
7325 South Potoma,: Street
Ccaunnial, CO 80 II 2
Phone Number : 303-f.4°~355
IN RE THE MA TIER OF THE VALLEY
SANITATION DJSTRJCT , ARAPAHOE,
COLORAD O
Timothy J. Flynn. Esq .
Collin.s Cockrel & Cole
~90 Un ion Blvd ., Suit, 400
Denver, Co lorad o 80 228 -1 5S6
_Telephone · (303) 98 6-ISSI
Facsimile : (303 ) 98 6-17S 5
E-Mail: tJlynn @ccc firm .com
AU . Re #: 10484
O.T<OF ORElER ON ATTACHMEHr
El'lUD-
co A11pohoc Coaaly 111strkt C< .1r1 lllb
Pllilc~11e: OctU JOl?tl!UPM MDT
Filla& II), ◄1-UJU. DISTRICT C
1•,,t.,. Cloiff.._,.. OF COWflAll0
~~ ..... -,-dt11Pt'of1WO'IQIINl~.ffff
Case No.: SSCVI 142S
Div.: Cum.:
ORDER OF INCLUSION OF REAL PROPERTY
"MLATL Pro c •"
THIS l>U'!TER CA.ME BEFORE THE COURT upon the Moti on for inclusion
of Real Prope ny filed by the Valley Snnii,,ti on District H.avinti considered the Motion
nnd attac hments filed therewith, the Court finds good cause fer grdllting said Motion;
IT IS THEREFORE ORDER.ED AND DECREED :
That pursuant to ~ 32-1-40 1(1 )(c)(I), C.R.S., as amended, the real property legally
de scn'bcd bel ow, toge ther with all improvem ents thereon (''Property") is hereby included
int o the boundaries oftbc Valley S11 nitar ion District , A."ap ahoc County , Co lorado , to wit :
~,AL DESCRIPTION
A TRACT OF L AND DEINO TifA T PART OF THE
NO RTiiWEST ¼ OF TIIE NORTHEAST ¼ OF SECTION
8, TOWNSHJP 5 SOUTH , RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH
P.M .. DES CRIBED AS FOL LOWS : BEGJNN INO AT THE
NORTHWE ST CORNER OF SAID NORTI-fWEST ¼ OF
THE NORTI-IEAST ¼ OF SECTION 8; IBENCE S 88 '50"
E A DISTAN CE OJ-625.80 FEET TO A POINTON THE
•
(00ll%ot1.D0CXI)
er rccor d111g pleiue rerurn 10 .
T'unot.by J. Flynn
Co ll ins, Cockre l &. Cole, PC
390 Union Boulevard, Suit e 400
[)cn vr:r, Col0ro do 80~28 .15 56
WESTERLY LINE OF A TRACT DESCRIBED IN BOOK
1126AT PAGE249; THENCES 43 DEOREES 08'15" W
ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT
DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1126 AT PAGE 249 A DISTANCE
OF ?J.78 FEET; 11fENCE S 18 DEGREES 16 '30" W
ALONG TI-IE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT
DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1126 AT PAGE249 A DISTANCE
vF 258 .02 FEET; THENCE N 88 DEGREES so · WA
DISTANCE OF 497.57 FEET TO A POINT ON rnE
NOR TI-I -SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 8;
TiiENCE NORTHER!, Y ALONG SAID NORTII-SOtmi
CENTERLINE OF SA.ID SECTION 8 A DISTANCE' OF
300 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: EXCEPT
TlIB WEST SO FEET THEREOF, AS DESCRIBED IN
BOOK I 007 AT PAGE 316, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE,
STA TE Of COLORADO.
Also known by street oad number as 4300 S. Federal
Boulevard, Sh eridan, Col orad o 80 I I 0.
DON E this _ day of ____ 2012.
BYTiiE CO URT:
Distr ict Co un Judge
fOC 21%U.OOO: /}
•
•
•
•
•
•
--------
I
I
I ,.
I
-------------
I
i
I
----------
0 ... ..
i
§g '. ',
il:::,.
eyji :,'_..':
QSO .,_,)
r-,;:w-~·r ,n,e·to n:P.1.::-
J \ ~:he :id,1 1 •
'260
<UI O
hn p://gis .c .ar2pahoc.co .ll~l2 r-:giso ut pu t/ _ags_3da0O 96 -d 52 e -~ddc-9 eea-89" f2d Shad6 J .png 4/20 /20 J 2
•
•
•
•
•
•
OIU)INANCI:. NO .
EIU [S OF 2013
□Y AUTllORrl'Y
COUNC IL l:IILL M ' 4 I
INTRODUCED Br COUN C IL
MEMBER G Ii.i T
/\1' U l{IJ INA1'CI: i\UT I-I OKIL LNLi '1111: IU:L'E~ll'TION .'\NIJ SALi: UF l'RUl'EK l'Y
ACQ UIRED Tl IRO UG I-I THE 110 SING REHAl3 1Lff AT ION PR OGRAM L CA TED AT 36 85
SOI TT H FOX STREET IN Tl-I F crrY OF ENGi .r::woon , C:OI .ORA DO
\Vl IERE 1\S, 1hc Ci !) Co unt i i o ft he Cit y of Eng le,,,ood accepted ass 1f:J1mcn 1 from the
Eng lewood ll ousm~ Authorit y o f all i :;his, ass ets and hnbiliue s associatc:d w it h th e Housin g
K.c:hab 11111111 on Loan Pro gra m by the passage 01 rdm ancc No 2.J, S..:nes 1999 ; :mcl
\VH F.REAS, Eng lewood l11y Cn11 nc 1\ :1111 l1orlll:d am en din g T it le . 4, Chap t.:r 3, with th e
add1 t1011 o f a ne w ·cct 1on I cn t 1tl cd "l·t,,us1ng Rchab1!1 tatio n Fund '' by the pas sage o f rd inam:c
No . 26. fjcric s 1999: and
WHJ:Kt:AS, the l:ng lcwoocl Housin g Rchab 1hta t1o n l'rogrn m wa s crc,tcd ,n 1976 to preserve
the ex ist mg ho .1 smg s1ock in Eng !cwood and tu ndclrc ss the prob lem s of low-income fo m1 \its w11 h
the fi nan cmg of major household repa irs: t1 nd
\V II EREAS , the Reha b Program ap pr oves home 11 nprovc 111cnt lon ns tl:at nrc secured by deed s of
tru st reco rded on the pro pcn y rcprc scn 11 ng gcncrn ll; seco nd or third rnon gagcs: an<l
\V . "E REA~. the hom eowner defa ulted on her loans and the fi rs1 mongagc hold er tl\llHHcd
fnrccln~ur c; :'lnrl
WI LEREA S, thi s pr,,pc11 y wcr,t to publi c sal e on June 26, 20 I J ; an d
Wl-11:.H.CA . tlu.: l:.nglcw ood Rel:ab Loa n 'o numllee rcconunended tili ng the Intent ion to
Kedcem No ucc wi th th e public Tru stee 's Offi ce: and
\V ll ERE!\S, th e CII ) redee med 1h e pri,p erl }' on Ju ly 23, 20 13 aml en Jul y 30, 20 13 received a
Pu l,lic T1u s1ec•~ Co 11fi1 mati u11 Deed 1s~uetl H' the Cit y of [11glcwoo d Housing Rch,1 bil itat ion f'und ;
and
WH ERE AS , th e propc tl ~ will be so ld to a pri vate ow ner -occ upied party who has sec ur ed his
own financi ng and a11 y rema mrn g fo nd s wil l be rctum ed 10 th Housin g Rr h~hili t~t ion Fun tl ; :111<1
WH EREA S, 1f:m offer 10 purchase 1s n:.c ci vc<l frum ;m y Cit y t:tnp loytt:, th eu r.urn !y 111 1.:mb..:1::i ,
or any bu sine ss rn wll1 cli a Cit y c.,np loyec ha s a limm crn l 11Uere st, th e offer will be sub mi tt ed 10 1he
Englewood City Council for approva l.
.,.
9 b i
NOW, T lt El<F ·CIR E, RE IT ORDAINED BY TH E C 1n · COVNC IL OF TI-IECITY OF
EN ,LF.WOO D, ,fl LORADO , AS Fu LLOWS :
S1::c 1ion I. T he r i1y C:ounci l o f the Ci 1y of Englcwoocl hereby authorizes th e n.:dcmpii 11 , nn I
,;;uh scque111 'i :llr n r;i Hnusin Rchnbi lit ::m on Proµc n y acqu1rcC throu gh the fun.:c lo:..u1c pro..:ess
locmed ;11 ,,;s -;; So u:h Fox St reet.
S1~11 nn 2 Tht: M:t yor ·in d the City C lerk are autho rized 10 execu te th e pro per fo rm of tlc L-CI f\
1hc cnn\.cyirn cc nf ,he prnpc n y loca 1cd at 36S5 Socch Fox S1rce1.. Englew ood . Culo 1J do pu r.;ua11t to
Sectio n 71 ('I f 1h e Fnelewrn1tl Home Rul e Chimer.
ln1ronu ced, read III fu ll , and pa ssed on fir s< reading on th e 19th day of Au~us l.20 13.
Publi~hcd hy Ti tle ..is a Bill for ,1n O rdina nce in the City's l1ffiLi.tl nc w:..pa pcr 011 th c 231d da y o f
.i\ugu:-t , 20 1
Pub lished as a Bil l for an O rdirn.1 11cc 111.hc Ci')·=> uff11.:ia\ .~•cbs ih.: bcf,!innrng on the 2 ls1 day of
1\ugust. ;o 13 for thiny (30) days
Re nd by llll c and pas!i.t:d 011 fin al 1c.;J di11g un the 31 d d,,y uf cptcm bc1 , 20 13
Pt 1b tH,;1ed by mle in lht: C n y·s vificial ncw:,µ~µc t as 0 1Ji na nce No .
1hc 6111 da y vf Sr;::p lemlJc::r , 20 I .
. Scncs ol 20 1J, on
JJubl1 .shctJ by 11t h; u 11 tli ~ C it y':, offi c ia l web site bcg inru ng on th e 4th day of
Scµ1c rnbc 1. 20 13 for thin y (30) day s.
RanJy P. Pe nn , 1ayor
ATTES T.
I ou<..ri shi ;.1 :\ Elli s, Cny Cler k
I, Luuc1 ish..ia A. Ell is , Ci1y C lerk o f 1hc C it y of l;n glcw,..'>d, Co lorodo , hereby cc rtif)' thm the
dbovc and fo 1 i:go ing 1s ,1 true co p) of th e Ordina nce passed un fina l rCZ!.dmg and publi shed by
li:lc a!) Oid1nan ce No . , Serie s of20 I 3
Loucris hiu A. Elli s
•
•
•
•
•
•
COUNCIL COMMUN IC,\TIO N -J DATE : Se pt em ber 3, 1013 AGENDA ITEM : SU BI ECT : O r d i n •nce "~c,r ,g
r e 1nni n e ,1 201 <;nii:h N ~Vil JI , "tr PP I
t t J i fro rn I 1 10 N t 1aju Apartm n ts P1.•rmed
U rn t D evel op rne,1 ;r UD )
INITI.\TED SY STAFF SOU RCE : Br ook Be ll , Plan n er II
Elsey Par tners , I.I C
I 53~ Coll ege ,\venue Fl
Ma nh a tt an. Ka ns r1s (i(,.)02
COU NCIL GOA L AND PR EV IOUS COUNC:l ACT ION
Thc ,c n.,~ been no µrcv iou:; Counci l .i ct i or, co nce rnin g the propo~cd N,w~ijo i\pJ nmcn ts Pbnn ed l lnit
0t!\duµ1n~nt (PU0 ).
PRE VIOUS PLAN NIN G COMM ISS IO N ACTION
Th e Planning and Zonin 8 Com m iss io n consi dered the p ro p osed l'\.;;1\•a j Apartments PUD Jt a P ublic
H ea ring co nc u ct ed on 1\.\ay 14, 201 3. Th e Co m1111 s~1o n consi dered tcc;timony ar,d •c tcd 8-0 to fo"v:ird th e
pru p,;M:d ,tVd JU A p d ll r11 1=11 b P UD tu C i ty Cuu11Li l w it'1 ., fdvu 1c1 l.Jle 1t:LOmffu.:nda1 01 1 f I a doµli on \,1 th the
follow,ng condrtron-
• Th at th e rnal Na va10 str eetscape se c tion ma~1 va ry from lh e curb alignmen t, sidewalk w ,d !h and
loca ti on, and ass ocia ted l ands ::ape zone sh own on t he PUO; and th at the fi nal c;;trPe 1s-c:1 p e section fnr
th e , \1'h1JO l\p art rr,c nt s PUD w ill b e approv~d b~• the City ,\.•\.:in,,gcr or d es1gncc in c onju nc 1io n wit a th e
b ui1Ui11 i-; p~11ni t
l b1! condit 1on h.i s been incl uded 1n the Ordina nce ilpprovtnr, the rezon in g
RECOMMENDED ACT ION
S1afi rec om n umci s .1dor 11u n of t1r1 urdin dnt:e ap p rovin g th e N .1vJjL• A p .utr11 t:11l~ l'UD ~111 d ::i~lt in g Scptc1 11bt!1
I o, l U I ' ,1 s the ela te to r l'ublrc H arr n 10 c on sr d e, p ubl ic 1es 11 m on i o n th e PU D .
BA.CKG ROUND
Th e suhJect p,v pcrt) o f th i~ PUD 1~ locateJ 1111J•b lock on 1h e 4 200 bloc~ o i So uth N (wajo ~ .reel be tween
OxfL \venue 10 the nonh and Q u incy Avenue 10 th e sou th . ·1h e prop . i, appro,irr1a 1ely 800 fee t sou th
of RTL, , u xf or d Ligh t Rai l Station. Land 10 th e !outh and eas t of th e sub1ec 1 property ,s zoned 1· 1 Ligh t
In du stria l Dist ri c t and contains in uu strra l uses Lan d 10 th e no rth oi th e prop rly was re en tly rrwn ed 10 th e
Oxfo ,d Sl itlt o n Tr .. 1si t n ri Pn ted ll('\'PI pme rH PU w hi r h wi ll ind111i P 212 rpc;ir!P n ti,1 1 ;ip,1rlmf-'n t 11n il s w ith
an p 1t0n for mi c d commercial ur,es. Land d1rcc 1ly l0 the wes t of the s ub1ect pro p e lly :on1:11n the RN<;F •
ru,lr oJd trJc s .1nd R ro Lig ht RJ i1 tracks and 1s no1 \\o ilh111 the City cf Fng lewo od limit!-.
The su bject p roperl y i5 0,...,,11 d by th e deve lop er 's fa 1he r Bruce El sey . The site wa; th o I rm er locatio n of hi s
cJ t lin er ffl.1 11 uiact urin • c:o mpJny v~hich h i\s smce reloc~1t ed t o a large r 1aci li ty in no rthwest r n I ,vood
u rrcn tly, ~, m anufactu rer o f o u tdoor b leac h ers is leas ing the ex is ting warehouse build111g and remainder o t
th e P"· ~rty. 111 d eveloper {Elsey P~utnars} believes. tha t th e si te's prmc im1t\1 I 1:i e Ox10 ,d Ligh t Rail
StJlion ,nak s th e pro pe rty an excell ent ca ndi date io r a rcsalcnt1al :1 rart m ent c omµle\'. The develorer
fo r~sees you ri r; pro (c ssio ru ls w orki ng down town ;rn d stlld e n ts ;iue,ding Arapah e Com mun11 y (ol leee or
th e Aur :ma c.1 rnpuc; .1s p o tenl ial t n ants.
il l ll 1e fa ll f 201 ::!, th e El sey Pa rtn e rs came fc. r\\'ard w ith a p roposJ I 10 cons t ruct betwee n I JU J nd 18tl
apJ rl rnent un its o n the 2 L)9 acr p rope-rt)'· M uh i-lmll dwellin gs ;ue not perm11tec in th e 1-1 Light ln dt1st r1 al
Zon e D ist ric t, th e re for , th e developer h ga n tl1 e pr cess 0 1 re quernng a rc1onm3 10 a 1-'Ull l u
.,ccommod a te 1hc res1d enti;1 I \1!-e
PUO OV~RVI EW
A IJl.1rHlNf t ,n 11 IJf"\'Plnrnw nt P,1.,tili .. h 0 s <.nPrifw, rnn g 1nrl c; te plann in g c r11 1:11::i 10 mee1 the llt!e<l s oi a
c.p..,n 11 r df\VPlo r,m r nr prnpnc.;i l th ,11 m.,v nn r hp .1rrrn111no rl at~d wi :h111 exi• ·1 11 g zon,ng developme nt
n?g 11l at1on c.. PUD (, p rov1rlc the o prnr11m 1ty (o r unifirrl ri eve lop111e11 t c.0 11t 1v l f r rnuh lple p,openi e~ 01
mul tiple uses
Th e proposed Na\aJo Apart m ems PUD wou ld c:t ll o·.v a m axi mu m of 146 resi d nti.:i l .:ipa rtrn •1H lmil~ ur I l ht!
property, a hho u gh th e curren t b L11ldin g p lan sho\,s 14 1 un11!t . The n1c1 jo rily o f th pt1 1k111 ~ \\Ould la.! 011 1he •
su rf a e wi1h a p ortion of the parkin g bei ng tu cked underneath th e second sto · oi the b u 1ld i :1g (omfa,rn
sryle). Th e b uildin g 1s set cl o!ie 10 ut h "av~,o Str ee t so 1ha1 mo!i l of th e pad..ing i::i 0 11 th e !>ide~ c.1 nJ l t'dt u f
th e property. Th e Sit Plan includes 1,,,.., inIeri or courtyards, perimel t!r bndscJµi ng, ,rnd int ··ri u r pd rkin ~ lut
landscaping. All n ew and exis ting u tili ti es wilhin Ih e p r opcrt v d11d t1 U.11 1i11g dg li t·uf·w..tr w 1.m lcJ l;t' p lt1t .. t.:U
u n n crgrou n d .
Ar chilectura l Characte r: The p ro p sed PUD con 1a111::i c.rdli teLt ural d 1ar ~~l tc 1 ::,tJ 11d d1c.J.,. 1h,H requ ir ~
b u ild ing p lane chan ges eve ry 50 f e t, a n•1x of pat te:n and t.u lo, d1r111 ~e ~. d 11 1i 11 in 1u111 30 µi::I Lt:1It 11 1J::iu111 r
requi r 111 nt, and a r quircmen t t ha t bu il ding ent ri e b~ d eJrly d l!fi nelJ w ith d rd11 tt'Ul11t1I t!l~,11 •111:, It
should I e n o ted 1hc1 I fi ll! concep t ud l bu il ding foJt p,1111 :,huwn uri tin! Si t e Pld11 JnJ th ~ pr u µu~~J !J U1IUi n •
e lt!va ti ns art: :,u Ult:!l \ t u d 1t1 11 g1::. li u w~vi=,, d1t )r Ll 1d 11 g~:, w ul1ld h,n e 10 m eet 1h e Design Sta n dards a nd
,ui delines of 1h e PUD .
Permitt ed Us t·~: Til l! :,t1Ujc 1 µr u p trtv lit=) within th e 1·1 Light h1•i u>tt1 dl Zon e D b t11 c t. lhe cxI s1111g 1·1 Zon€
District all ows vciriuu:, im lu :,tr i .. 1I c111U ll11 1111 ;e rLi,il U!tl!), li uwt•v~•. 111 u~t re~iUc 111i.1I uses .. 1,e 110 1 pe rm itt ed .
Th e pr1.. '10St'd PUD D 1Mrt CI Pl an in cl ude) a t .. ,blt' f dll uwed l J~t:) ::1<11 lb t) lhi;: µe r 1ni t1 cU 11.::,iJc11 l id l,
comrn erc11I, and industrial l.'~es. Surne o f t!1e ,~~) tft:!)ir,1b:e u::it':, m 1ht l.'.u 11 11 11 t:!1l.i 11 dnd i11d us 11ial 1...ale~o.ie:,
su ch I.I ) dduh l:~t::i ,111 d dU lU o rien teU u>t!> hdvt: l;._:~11 urn ,tt ~J fl or11 l1k [able. o f al l o w ed uses in the PUD
Surne n f tht' 11 1u rc i11t ~11 ive 1n du~tr ict l u~e ~ havt! ,,b u Ut:"en u1111 1ted i1 m the 1.1b l1?, It sho u ld be n tt:d thJ I all
p t:!r 111 1llt!d 111d u~111 al u::i.ts rr 1u)t Lt!d ~~ unce d Cerll(t LOl e uf Ot..LUP illlLY (o, a ny 1es 1dent i,,I 0 1 comme rc iJI us e
i:, i:,~lJt:U iur rt ll)' pur tiu n u f ll 11::: µ,uµt.'r ty.
Dimcn !t i o rMI Sta nda rds: rhe fol l u •.,i11 g ta\.J I~ µr ovkl ~:," cornp,u iso n between 1he pr open y's exi:;11n~ 1-1
t.uI 1e lld::i~1fiLJ ti u 11 l11u.J th 1· p1 u µU) ·d PUD. •
• ·• OMl'ARISON OF DIMENSIONAL RE
•:••,;~-;w_,• ... ~'t ,I • \_•,.'
All Allowed u,c, None
Min
Loi
Area
(oq fl)
Nava ·o A anmcnts l'UU New Zonin
623 sq fl per unit
Residential Uses or 70 units per
acre
Public/lnstitutionn
I Uses None
Commercial Uses ;,,,nc
Industrial Uses
(Um sunset if
nnynew
residenti al or None
commercial
dc velopmenl
occurs .)
MH
FAR
2:1
J\onc
l\onc
None
2:1
·Mai ·:x ;,,··.
Cpvera
1•(¾)
Nont:
85
None
None
None
. Min'·. ··~--~::.:·
·,Lot ·· ·.•Mu·
Wl'ilt ilii,~1
b (h)
(h) .
Non• Non•
None 75
None 100
Non e 100
None 100
Where n building abuu
upon , 1uJjoins , ur is
adjacent to a
res ident ial zon e
district , minimum
setback s of IO ft on all
sides arc required ,
exccp1 as required in
Section I 6-6-7 .K,
•·scre ening
Re uirements ."
25 25
Max
ofO to 0
5 feet
Max
oro 10 0 5
S feel
Wh en: a building ubuls
upon , adjoin s, or is
adjacent to a residential
zone district , minimum
setback s of 1U fl on all
sides are required,
excep l as required in
Secliou 16-6-7 .K,
"Screen ing
Re uircments .1'
Residential Density: The proposed Nava10 Apartm ents PUD would perr1111 a maxi mum of I 4b un its on the
2.09 acre properly; this represents a density oi 70 .0 dwelling units per acre. The PUD o~ly calls for 141
units al this lime. For comparison purposes , the recently rezoned Oxford Slalion Transit Oriented
Developmenl PUD di rec lly north of lhi , site will includ e 252 resi denli al apartment unit s on th e 3 . 50 acre
properly; this represen ts a density of 71 .9 dwelling units per acre.
~P.lhacks: I\ setback Is 1he minimum distance a struc1urP. m11s1 he located irom a property line . The •
proposed PUD's setbacks for residential uses are as follows :
Front • -~ feet
Side -2 ~ feet
Rear -25 feet
Publlc/lnstltutlonal Uses and Commercial Uses will follow the setbacks outlined for the MU•B· 1 Zone
Dls1rlct. Industrial Uses will follow the setbacks oudined fo, the 1-1 Zone District .
Building Height: The maximum building heights in the PUD are based on the avera8e elevation of the
finished grade at the corners of 1he building, to the highest point of the building or structure . TI,e maximum
~llowed building height for resldenti~I us.-; is 75 feet, ahhou~h the PUD drawinKS label the building height
as being+/-60 feet. The maximum allowed buildi11)l hei)lhl within the PUD for Public/lnstitulional Uses,
Co111111e1 ci al Uses, and lndustridl Use> is 100 feet. II should be 1101ed that TI,e Unified Development Code
(UDC) has no maximum height limit in the standard 1-1 Zone District.
Bulk Plane: The bulk plane that regulates building mass is a funct ion of required setbacks and maximum
building height for each type of use. Sheet A206 o i 1he PUD drawings illumate projected shadows for the
proposed apartments during the winter and summer solstice as well as the iall equinox.
Parking: The UDC requires 1.5 parking spaces for each unit with leSI than 3 bedrooms, plus 1 guest space
for every; units. The proposed .'-lavaio Apartments PUD requires 1 parking space for each unit, plus 1
guesl space for every 10 units. The applicant believes lhat the O><ford Light Rail Station (approximately BOO
feet northi will be utilized by tenants of the apartment complex result ing in fewer personal vehicles. The
npplkanl also stales they have conduclcd parking studies on similar properties with similar parking ratios
and note that the luts ar e o nly 60% full. For compar-son purposes tl1e Oxford Station Trans it Oriented
DevelopmPm PU D directly north of the site also requires 1 parking space for each unit, but has guest space
ratio of 1 ;pace for every 5 units.
The UDC ,equires bicycle parking al a rale ol 1 bicycle space lor eve,y 2 un its . The proposed Navajo
Apartments PUD requires 1 bicycle space for every 5 units to be acc omm 'ated wllh bike racks . Tile
applicant 1<a1es Iha! many tenants will prefer 10 store their bicycle ins ide their apartment nr in thP. 24
storage un:!s tli.t will be available 10 them.
Traffic A 11,,ffk imracl stu~y was perfnrmed fnr the proposed Navajo Apartments PUD. The srudy area
encompassed the Odorri Avenue and Navajo Streel Intersect ion as well as lhe Oxfcrd Avenue and Santa
Fe Dnve inte rse c tion . The traffi c impact stu dy takes into account t,1e recent approval of Oxford Station
Transit Orienled De velopment PUD directly north of the subject property. TI1e traffic 'mpact study also
lakes into account the proposed ~evelopment's close proximity to the Oxford Light Rail Station and appli es
a 20 r<>rcent reduction In trip generation lor 1he Navajo Apartments project. This reduction Is taken
because or the likelihood of transit us e from a transit oriented developmen t; the 20 percent is considered a
conservative reduction.
The traffic impact study indicates that the Oxiord Avenue and Santa Fe Drive lnte:sectlon currently has an
overall peak hour level of service (LOS) of D. The Oxfortl Avenue •n~ N•vajo Street i11tersectiu11 currently
has an overall peak hour level of service ILOS) of B.
Arte, th" approwd o.ru,d Station and the proposed N•vajo Apartments PUD µtoje~ts are LU11'lru cteu
(2015), the traft1~ ,1udy shows •n increase in overall traffic volume r,om the two proje~t.s ; however, •nalysis
of future 1raf1ic conditions ,hows that the additional traftic volume is nol expected to create a d;scernible
impact to traffic operations in the su.-rounding roadway system . ror 2015, the traftic study ind icates that the •
•
Oxford Avenue and Santa Fe Drive intersection and the Oxford Avenue and Navajo Streel in1crsec1ion will
conllnue 10 have overall peak hour l evels of service of (LOS) oi D and B respectively .
The study area roadways are currently constructed to their ultimate cross-section and the traffic study does
not recommend any modifications at this time. The exis1ing intersections are projected to operate at future
levels of service comparable to existing condllions during peak traffic hours. The traffic Impact study was
reviewed by the Public Works Traffic Division and COOT, and both reviewers concurred with its findings .
S!gnage: The proposed PUD w!I follow the signage regulations for the MU-8-1 Zone Dlstricl outlined in
16-6-13 of 1he UDC as amended, except that the PUD would permit the maximum height a project111g sign
to be 55 feet high ra1her than the UUC's maximum height limit o f 25 feet.
Landscaping: The UDC requires th al a minimum of 8%· 10% of a property be landscaped in the 1-1 Zone
District. Further. the UDC requires th at a minimum oi 20% of 1he property b e landscaped for multi-unit
dwellings i r. the MU-B-1 zone district. The Navajo Ap•rlments PUD proposes a minimum of 15% of the
property be landscaped . The UOC also requires 1hat a minimum of 70% of the required landscape be
"living· landscape . The Navajo Apartmenls PUD site plan proposes that 73% of the required 15% minimum
landscape be "livi ng·. ···he non-liv i ng ar ea s include a synthetic turf dog run and the interi or courtyard w ith a
pool. The PUD requirements e,ceed the regulations of 1he UDC fo , mr .Iii-unit dwellings in the MU-B-1
Zone District in terms of tree and shrub quantities.
Screening and Fencing: The PUD proposes to screen the perimeter park ing 101, with a 5 to 6 foot wide
buffer of shrub plantings and deciduous trees . On the north property line , 1he Oxford Station PUD will be
construc ting a 6 fo o l high privacy ience between their project and the proposed Navaj o Apdrlrllents PUD.
The property to 1he south of 1he Navajo Apartments PUD has an exislin g warehouse building cons11uc1ed
righl on lh e shared property line such thal fencing is not necessary.
Drainage: Th e propr-sed Drainage Plan and PrP.lim i nary DrainagP. RP.pnrl w P.rn rPvi ew ed and approved hy
the City's Public Works Department.
Park Dedication : The ,ubdivisiorr reijulatiuns uf lhe UDC requ ir e l !re dedicati on of park larrd or ~1a y111ent
of a fee 1, lieu of dedicat ion for all residential deveiopments. The UDC provides a method ford, .. rm ining
the amount of land to be dedicated based on the number of units and the number of new resi<ients that
will be generated. Based on the proposed 141 multi-unit dwellings, the proposed Navajo Apartments PUD
would require a park dedir.alinn nf 2 7 2 ar.r•s of lanrl or paym P.nl nf a f P.P. in lieu nf land dedir.;ilinn.
On September 4, 201 2 City Counci l adopted a fee to be pa id in lieu of ded icalion amount o f $20,000 per
required dCrt:. Credit luwards lhe dtJicatio11 re4uire111t:ml s fur u~<..r~almn al amenities µruvit.l~c.J on -s ite Uy tilt!
developer and waivers of aH or a portion of the rerna rning fee-in-lieu may be requ es1 ed. Requests are
considered on a cas e-b y<ase basi s at the discr etion of Council. Coun cil w ill be considering the final fee-i n-
lieu of dedication amount concurrently or shortly after appr oval of the PUD .
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS
The UDC requires that Council shall urrly approve a proposed PUD i f i t finds that tire proposed
development complies wilh all applicable use, development, and design sti edards that are not otherwise
modified or waived according to the rezoning approval; and the proposed rezoning meets one of the
'ollr·.,·ing criteria :
a. That the proposed development will exceed the development quality standards, levels oi public amenities, •
or levels of design innovation otherwise applicable under this I itle, and would not be possible or
practicable under a standard zone di<lrlct with condilion.1I uses or with a reasonable number of Zoning
VarianrP< nr Arlmini.<trarive Adjustments; or
The proposed PUD will exceed the development quality s1anda1ds required by the IJDC for industrial
development as follows:
• The existing 1-1 Zone District allows more Intensive land uses than the µ,oµosed Navajo
Apartments PUD. 1 he existing I• l Zone Distri~I has less re,trictive setbacks, height limitations,
and landscaping requirements than the proposed PUD.
• The UDC has no requ irements for bulldln,s In an existing 1· 1 Zone D istr ict as fa, as: uullding
articulation, variety o' materials, buildin~ 11anspJre11cy, ur ard1it eclural character. The PUD
proposes a greater level of building artlculatlo, including: a 3 foot 111i11i111um building plane
change every 50 feet, a mix oi pattern and color changes, a minirnom 30 percent masonry
requirement, and clearly defined b,•ilcling entries.
b . Tlrdl llre µroµerly CdllllOI be developed, or lhat no reasonable economic use of lhc property can be
achieved, under the cxisling zoning, c,·cn through the use of conditional uses or a re;,s onable number of
Zoning Varicmccs or Administriltivc Adjustments .
In addition to the two Planned Unit Development considerations ab~ve, lhe UDC requires lhat a property
rezoned to PUD must nol have• significant r.egative impact on t~o,e properties surrounding the rezoned
area and that the seneral public healtn, saiety and welfare oi the t ·mmunity are protected. Staff ha,
reviewed the PUD request and found the following:
• The PUD application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and lhe Unified Development
Code.
• The application is cons,slent wilh adopted and generally accepted standards of development in the
City.
• The Im/fie impact study was reviewed by the Public Works Traffic Division and CDOT; both
concurred with 'Is findings.
• The rezoned p,operty will nol have a significant negative impact on those properties surrounding
the rezoned area and the general public health, safety and welfare oi the community are protected.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The proposed Navajo Apartments l'UD will generate a nne-lime h11ilding '"" 1,,x nf ahout $260,000 based
on a construction cost of approximately S 15 million. If Co11nril rnnrurs with the previo11sly adopted park
dedication fee, the proj ect would also eenerate a one•lime park ciPciir.ation fee-in-lieu of approximately
$54,000 based on 141 residential unils .
The Coty of Englewood's portion of property lax revenues a,e estimated al $4,000 pe1 year. The amount of
annual sales tax revenue to thP C/1 .. that cnuld be generated by new residents living In the City Is dihkul1 to
project given the neMhy presence of the Riverpolnt shopping center. There a,e also costs associated with
providing se"'oces such as police and fire: though it is difficult to estimate what these projected costs will
be. •
• LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Planning Commission Staff Report Including Exhib its A -I (May 14, 2013)
Planning Commission Minutes (May 14, 2013)
Planning Commission Findings of fact
Proposed Bill for Ordinance
•
•
i,
C T y 0 F ENGLEWOOD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO: Pl anning and Zoning Com missi on
THRU:
FROM:
Alan White, Co111 :m111ity Development Director
Brook Bell, Plamer II ✓
DATE: Ma)'l 4,2013
SUBJECT: Case ZON201 3-UU1 -Public H ea ring
Na vajo Apartments Planned Unit D ev P.lopment
APPLICANT:
Flsev Par m er s, LLC
153 2 College Av enu e r19
Nlanhattan, Kansas bb :illl
PllOPERn' OWNER :
Bruce El sey & 4201 So~th Navajo LLC
3998 s~uth Broadway
Englewood, Co lorado 80113
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
4201 Sn uth N a•,aj o Stree t
PINll's : 2077-04-4 -11-026 and 20i7-04-4-Q0-069
REQUEST:
The applicant ha s submitted nn a1)plicat ion to re w ne the parc~ls above from 1-1 Li ght
Industrial Distri ct tu th e Navajo I ,partments Plann ed Unit D evelopm ent (1-'UD). The
proposed PUD would all ow a m ax imum of 14 6 reside nt ia l apartment units on th e property
RECOMMENDATION:
Case ZON201J-0U1 : The De ;:>a rtment of Community Development recommends tha t the
Planning and Zo ning Commission review the N avajo Apartments PUD request n1,d forward
a fa v: rablc rec om mendation for approval to City Council with the following condition :
• Tha t lh<> frnal N ava jo <treetscape sec tion may va r1• from the cu rb alignment, ~idewalk
width and locat ion, and associated landscape zone shown 011 the PUD; and that the
final streetscape section for the Navajo / partments PUD will be approved by the City
Manager or dPsig neP. in conjunclic-•1 with the building permit.
1000 Engle\\ood Parkway Englew ood , Colorado 80110 PHONE 303-762 -2 342 FAX 303 -7 83 -6 895
\'tww.•1s ~woad10Y.o rg
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS:
PINI#: 2077-04411 ·026 Plots 1 & 2 Except Road Goormans Industrial Subdivision.
?!Nff : 2077-04 -4-0 0 ·069 Th at part of the south east 1/4 of section 4-5-68 described as
beginning 5 ft. west of northeast comer of Lot 1 Goorman's ln du rnial Subdivision, thence
west 347.25 f t. to a point on easterly ri ght -of-way line of the Atchis o1'. Topek a and Santa Fe
Railroad th e nc e northeast 33.4 1 fl., the nce ~ast 340.&3 ft., th en Le ,uu:h 32.7 5 (t. to the
be~inning section 4-5-68
EXISTING ZONE DISTRICT:
1-1 Light In dustrial D is tri ct.
PROPERTY LOCATION AND SURROUNDl,'IG LAND USE;
The sul,j<,!c,;t property of th is PULi is located mid-block on the 4200 block of So uth Navajo
Street between O xford ,\ven ue to th e north and Quincy Av Pnu e lo th e so .11h Thi> pr operly
is approximately 800 fe et south of RTD '~ Oxford light Rail S1;111on . La nd to the 1c uth and
east of the subject property is 1011ed 1.1 Light Industrial Drsirtct and co11tains industrial uses .
Land tc the norlh of t',e propert)' was rece nlly rezonecl to th e Ox lord St ation lransi t
Orienter! llP.v elnpment PU [J th at will inclJde 25:1. resid ential aparlmenl uni:s w ith an
option for mixed commercial uses Land directly to the w est of the su bject propert y
conlains the BN SF railroad trac ks and Rl D Light Rail tr ac ks and is not withu, th e City of
Englewnnrl ltmils.
PUD Pl<OCEIJURE:
Rernnmg to a PUD require s the applicant to have a pre-application meetins with staff, and
a neig hb o rhood rn ee tinc with owners and tenarts lo cate d with:n i ,ODO feet of 1he
proposed PUD. Afte r the neighborhood meeling a formal application i5 irade to the City
and review ed by Ci ty departm ents and other affected outside agencic5. A public he aring i5
held before the Planning and Zoning Commi55ion ,ind City Council. If the PUD is
approved there i5 a 30 day referendum tim e period before becom ing effective .
llAC.:KGKOUND :
·1 he Pl anned U .1!t Develor,ment is a rez oning proce ss that establishes specific zo ning and
si te p lan nit,g criter ia to meel th e need s of a spe cific development pr oposa l th at may not b e
accommodated w ithin existing zo11ing development regulation5 . A PUD rezoning provides
the oppo rtunity for c;cified developm ent c ontrol for multipl e pr operties or ncu ltiple us es .
The subject property is owned by th e developer's father Bruce Elsey. The site was the
form e r location of h is cat litter manufac turing company that has since reloc ated to a la rger
focdit y in northwest Englewood . Currently, a rnam ,facturer of outdoor bleachers is leas in g
the existing warehouse build ing and rem ainder of the property. Th e devel oper (Elsey
Partners) believes that the site's proxi mity to th e Oxford Light Rail Station makes tl.e
property an excellent candidate io r d re si denti al apartm e nt complex. The dev~loper
foresees young professionals wmking dow11luw11 anJ students attending Arapahoe
Comrnun :ty Coll ege or the Aur aria ~a111µu, ;i s p otc111i al te na111s .
2
•
•
In the fall o l 201 2, lhe Elsey Partners came forward with a proposal to construct betwee,1
13C and 180 apartment ,mil s on the 2.09 acre property. Multi-Jnit dwellin gs are not
permitted in the 1-1 Light Industrial Zone District; therefo re, the developer began the
process of requesting a rezoning to a PUD to accommodate the residential use.
NF.IGHRORHOOD MEETING SUMMARY:
Pc1 r1uant to the PUD procedme, the applicant conduLteu d 11ei~hborhood meeting on
November 15, 2012, prio r to submittmg the application for a PUD rezoning 011 Febru ary
19, 2013 . Notice of the pre -application mee ting was m~iled to property owners and
occupants of property within 1000 feet of the site . Neighborhood meeting I1otes are
attached to this ,eport (See Exhibit B).
CITY DEPARTMENT AND DIVISION REVIEW:
The Navajo Apa1tme,1ts PUD and subsequent r ev isions were rev iewed by the CiIy 's
Development Review Team (DRT) 011 March 5'', April 9'', and April 25'' of 20 13 . Identified
issues wer e addressed by lhe applicant and the final Navajo Apartments PUD was
sub mitted on Apri l 29, 20 1 '.
OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS:
Preliminary pla ns of l he proposed Navajo Apartments PUD were referred to Tri-County
Health, RTD , the Color.idn Derwtment of -ransportation (COOT), the City of Sheridan ,
Xce l Energy, Century Link, and Comcast. Each agency except for Comcast provided wrilten
cornI111:mts that are attached as Exhibits C -H . There were no objections in the comment s
received provide d th at the applicant continues working with the agencies ' individual
processP.s Ii any othe-formal comments are received before the public hea ring, Staff will
present them during the hearing.
PUD OVERVIEW:
The propnsP.d N~vajo Apartments PUD would allow a maximum of 1 46 residential
apartment units on the property, allho~gh the current building plan show:; 141 units . The
majority of th e parking would be on the surface with a portion of the parking being tucked
under :1eath the second stor y of the building (podium style). The building is set close to
So uth Navajo Street so that most of 1he parking is on the sides ,rnc rear of the properly. 'The
Si te Plan includes two interior courtyaI ds, p,,o 111 ,el er landst:a;.,ing, and lnrerior parking 10 1
la1cscaping . All new and ex isting utilities within lh e prope·ty and ;,boaing right-of-w;w
would be pla ce d uncle rgro ur :!.
Architectural Character: The proposed PUD contains architectural char ac ter standard s
that require building plane changes every 50 fee t, a mix of pattern and color changes, a
minimum 30 rercent masonry requirement , and a reqdrement that building entries be
clearly defined with architectural elemenls . It should be nolcd tha t th e LUIILeµtual build111g
footprint shown on the Si te Plan and th e proposed building elevations are subject to
change; however, any cha nges would have to · me et the Design Slancfards ~nrl Guidelines nf
•he PUO.
Permitted Uses: The subjecl properly lies within the 1-1 Ugh l Industrial Zone Distric t. The
existing 1-1 Zone District al iows vario us i11du s1,i,1I a nd commercial uses, however, most •
residential uses are nut perrnitled. Tire proposed PUD Dislr ic l Plan includes a 1ab le of
ailowed us es thal lists the permitted resid ential, commercial, an d industrial uses . Some of
1lre less d esira ble uses in 1he comm ercial and inrl11strial ca legorie i ;uch as arlult uses and
au lo orienter! uses havP hPP.n nmiltPrl from the table of allowP.d uses In lh e PUO . Some ol
th P. morP in te n;rve industrial uses hav e also been omitted fro m the 1able . It should be not ed
lh at a ll permitted industrial uses must cease once a Certifi ca te of O ccupa ncy for any
residen tial o r commerci al use is is sued for any porlion of the prop erty .
Dimensional Slandards: The following lable pro vi des a comparison between the
property's exi ;ling 1-1 zone classificalion and the proposed l'UD .
·-iCOMl'ARISON OF DIM£r-.;IONAL R!f.Ql,'[l!!fMENTS l'OR l'RINCll',\I. STR,UC:_!~
Mio M11.:l.01 Min M:u \1lnlmum Sdb1u:ks (fl )
Lot 1.ot
Are :, M iu FA H ('OVl'l':t gt• Wicl lh lldcthl t,;uc h
(,qf1) (¾) (fr) /fr ) F'rnnl Side: lbnr
1-1 (E>lstl ng ZonlllU)
I Where a bulldlng ntws
upon, uCjoins, or i:;
adjace:1t to a rcsidi:ntiRI
Al l Allowtd 1.ouc diMricl, 11 1i11i 111u111
Uses Nom~ l :r Non e None None setbacks of I O ft on RII
sides are required . exce pt
o.s 1cquirc:t in Scc liu,, 16-
6 -7J(, "Screening
Rcuui1r.:1111:uu ."
N:l\·nio ,\nnnmenu 1-'UD <New Zonilur)
Rc:sid enti11 I Uses 6'-1 tq fl p('r unit or None 85 None 71 5 21 15 70 units per ncre
Public/lr.slilutior.al Mex of
Uses ~one None N:,ne N:,ne IC0 Oto 5 0 s
feet
Muof
f'nmnie r::i :111 l~e~ None None No ne No ne IC0 0 10 5 0 5
feet --Where A build ing nbuts
upon , adjo ins, or is
lmJu>l ria l 'Js,s{U~,s adjacen t ton reslc1c111i al
rn mcl :f any IIC\" ~nc district , minimom
resldemial or None 2:1 No ne None 1~0 !fiClhrtck~ nf 10 ft nn nll
commercial ~ii.I~ kllC rc:4u i1ciJ, CACCJ)I
development occurs .) 1s required in Section I c;.
b•7 .K, "'.i crccn ln~
Rcql'1 rcmcnts ."
Re~idential Density : The proposed Navajo Apartments PUD would permit a maximum of
146 units on the 2.09 acre prop er ly ; 1lris represents a den sity uf 70 .0 dwelling u11i ,s µer
d<.:re. The PUD only calls for 14 1 units al th is tirne . For cornparison purposes, the recenlly
4
• re7.oned Oxford Station T·ansit Oriented Development PUD directly north oi this site will
include ?.52 resident ial apartment units on the 3.50 a.:re property; this represents a density
of 71.9 dwellin~ units per acre .
Setliacks: A setback is the minimum distance a structure must be located from a property
,me . The proposed PUD 's setbacks for residential uses are as follow::
Fro,,t -~ fe el
Side -2 S feet
Rear -25 feet
Public/Institutional Uses and Commercial Uses will follow the setbacks outlined for the MU•
B· 1 Zo11e District. Industrial Uses will follow the setbacks outlined for the I· I Zone District.
Building Height: Th e ma xim111r building heights in the PUD are based o n the average
elevation of the fi nished grade at the corners oi t,e building, to the high est point of th e
building or structure . The maximum allowed building height for res1dent1al uses Is 75 fee t,
although the PUD drawings label the building height as being +/-60 ieet. The maximum
alloweci building height withu, the PUD for Public/Institution al Uses, Commercial Uses, and
Industrial Uses is l 00 feel . It should be noted that Th e Unifi ed Oevelop111e11t Cuc.l e (UO C)
has no ma xi mum height lim it in the standard I• l Zone District.
Bulk Plane: The bulk plane that regulates building mass is a function of req uired setbacks
and maximum building height ior ea ch Lyµe uf use. Sheet A20tl of the PUD drawings
illustrate projected shadows for the proposed apartments during the winter and summer
solstice as well as the fall equinox.
Parking: The UDC ,equire, 1.5 µarking spaces for each unit with less than 3 becrooms,
plus 1 guest space for every 5 units . The proposed Navajo Apartments PUD requires I
parking spa ce for each unit, pl111 I euest spac e fo : every IO units . Th e ap plicant believes
that the Oxfo rd ~ight Rail Station (approximat ely 800 feet north) will be util i zed by tenants
of the apartment cor:1p lex resultinp, in fewer personal vehicles. The aoplicant also states
the y have co nducted parking stud 'es on similar properti~s with similar parki :ig ratios and
note lhat th e lots are o nly 60% IJII. For comparison purp cs es the Oxford Station Transit
Oriented Devel op ment PUD dir~~tly north of the site also requi,es 1 parking spdce fu r
eac h LIili!, but has guest space ratio of I space for every~ units .
Th e UDC req L1ires bicycle parki :1g at a rate of I bicycle space for every 2 units. ,he
proposed Navajo Apan<11,:,11ts P'.1 0 requires 1 bicycle space for every 5 un its to h e
accommodated with bike ra cks . I he applicant states that many tenants will prefer to store
Iheir bicycle inside their apartmPnt or in the 211 storage unit s that will be avail ,,ble to them.
Traffi,: A traffic impact sr.udy was perf..,rmed for the proposed Navajo Apartments fU D.
The study are a encompassed the Oxford Avenue and Navajo Streel int erse c tion as well as
the Oxford Avenui, and Santa Fe Drive intersection . The traffi c impact study takes into
account the recent approva l of Oxford Station Transit Oriented Oevelopruenl PUO directly
north of the subject property. 'he tralfic impact study also takes into account th~ proposed
development 's close prriximity to thP Oxforrl 1.ight R~il Stati on ,nc' ?.iJplie, ~ W perrPnt
re duction ,n trip generation for the Navaju Aµart111e11b project. Thi s reduuiv, :s lakt:11
because of th e likelihood of transit use from a transit orierted development; the 20 percent •
is considered a conservative reduction.
The traffic impact study indicdtes th a t the Oxford Avenue an d Santa Fe Drive intersectio n
currently ha s an overall peak hour level 0f service (LOS) of 0. The Oxfo rc Aven ue and
Navajo Street intersect ion currently has an overall peak hour level of service (I.OS} of B.
After the approved Oxford Station and the rroposed Navaio Apartments PU D projects ar e
co nstructed (20 ·I s), the traffic stud y sho ws an increase in overall traffic volume from th e
t,vo projects; however, anal y sis of future traffic condition; show; that the additi on al traffi c
vo lume is not exp ected to crea te a disce rn ible im pact tc traffic operations in th e
surrounding rn~dw~\' system . For 2015, th e traffic st udy indic ates that th e Oxford Avenue
and San ta Fe Urive intersection and :he O xford Avenue and Navajo Street intersection will
continue to have overall peak hour l~vels of service c,f (LOS) of D and 13 respectively .
Th e w,rJy a•pa roa dways are curre 1,tly constructed to th ei r ultimate cross-section and th e
tr alfic ;tud y does no t recommend any modifications at th is tim e. The ex isting interse ctio ns
are projected lo operat e al future leve ls of service compa,able to ex isting LU 11ditiu11s du1i11~
peak tra rri c huurs. The traffic impact stuny wa s rev iP.wP d by the Publi c Works Tra ffi c
Oivision and CDOT, and both reviewers concurred with its findings.
Signage: The proposed PLD will follow th~ signage regula1iu11S fur the MU-B•l Zu11e
D istri ct OL tlined in 16-6-13 of the UDC as am ended , e,cepr 1ha1 the PUD wna:ld rer~1it th ?
ma ximum height a projecting sign to be 55 feel high ra ther t'la n the UDC's maximun
height limit of 25 i cct.
Landscaping: Th P. l.Jf)C ref]uires that a min imum of 8%-1 0% of a property be landscaped
in the 1-1 Z one District. Further, t~e UDC requ ire s that a .11i11irnurn oi 20% oi the property
be land sca p ed for multi-unit dwellings in the MU-B-1 zone district. The Navajo Apartments
PUD p ro poses a rninirnuni uf 15% of the property be land sca ped. The UDC a!so requires
rhar a minimum of 70°/J of tne required lan dscape be "livmg" lands ca .::i e. The N av210
1\partments f'UO site plan proposes that 73% of the required 15% minimum land sca pe b e
"livi ng'". The non-liv ing are as ,nclu cie a sy nthetic turf dog run and the int ~r ior co urtyard with
" puul. Th e PUD requirements ex ceed tl ~e reg ulat ions of rhP. t JDC fo r m•,hi -:.inir dwellings
•n the MU-8-1 Zone District in terms of tree and shrub quant ities .
Screening and Fencing: Th e PUD proposes l e sc ree n the pe rimeter parking lots with a 5 to
6 foot wide buffer of shruh r,hrnt ings and dec iduo us trees . On the north pro;:,erty line, the
Ox ro,d Station f'UU will be constructing a 6 foot high pri vacy fence between their pro ject
an d the p roposed Navajo Apartments PUD . The properly to the south of the :'\avajo
.'\pa, lm ent s PUD has an existing warehouse building rnnstructed right on the sh~rP.d
prnrerty lin e such that fencine is no t necessary .
Drainage: The proposed Drainage Plan and Preliminary Drainage Report weIe review ed
and approved by the City's Public Works Department.
n
•
•
•
Park Dcdintion: The subdivision regulations of the UDC require the dedication of park
land or payment of a fee in lieu of dedication for a!I res1de:111al developments . I he UDC
provides a method for determining the amount of land to be dedica:ed based on the
number of uni :5 and the number of new residents that will be generated. Based on the
proposed 141 multi-unit dwellings, the proposed Navajo Apartments f'Ull would require a
park dedication of 2.72 acre', of land or payment of a fee in lieu of land dedication .
On September 4, 2012 City Council adopted a fee to be paid in lieu oi dedication amount
of $20,000 per required acre . Credit towarrls thP rledication requirements for recreationa l
amenities provided on -site by the developer and waivers of all or a !)Ortion of the remaining
fee -in -lieu may be reques ,ed . Requests are considered on a case-by-case basis at the
discretion of Council. Council will be considering 6e final fee-in -lieu of dedication amount
concurrently or shortly after approval oi the PUD .
ruo SUMM<\RY:
The prop o;i,dNavajo Apartments PUD has be en rC?v iewed by Ihe City's D evelopmen t
Rev :e w Tea m (ORT) and the app ,uµriate uubille agencies. Issues illentified by the ORT
we re add resse d by the applicant and there were no objections from the outside ag en ci es
provirlPrl tha 1 t'i e applicant con tinues workinB w ith the agencies' individu al pro cesses. The
PUl) doc uments are complete and only one additional conditi on oi approval is
recommend ed at th is time. Therefore, the Community IJevelopment Department
recommends that the Plann ing and Zo nin!l Commission review the Na va jo Apartments
PUO rcqu csl and forward a fovorable recommendation for approval 10 Cily Council.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS:
The Plan :1ing and Zoning Comrrission is to review Navajo Apartments PUD req uest, and
following the publi c hearing, may recommend that the Council approve, deny, or approve
the rezo111ng with conditions . l :1 its rev iew of the applicat·on, th e Commiss ion 's
recommen da tion s should include finding s on eac h of the iollowing points:
1. The applicatio n is or is not i~ conforman ce with the Comprehensive Plan and this T,1/e
(UDC).
rhe Navajo Apartments PUD conforms to the Comprehensive Plan strategy of
r •idevelopment. The Comprehensiv e Plan states , "E 1 ,glewood resid en ts will benefit
from the new opportu11it ies fo, huus ing, shoppin g. dlld e11lerlai11111e11I these new
developments will bring ,o the City". The proposed PUD supports the following
Comprehensive Plan Housing Goal # 1: "Promote a balan ce mix of housing
opportunities serv111g the 11eells uf .ill curre11t and future E11glewooll cilizens ."'
Additionally the l'UO do:uments state : "Tnis developm ~111 fits with the goals of
Transit Oriented Develo;,111te11t i11 lhdl it ct~dles inulli·l~111ily utevelupinent nea r
tran sporta :i on hubs . The development will complement the Ollford Station project
that wa', already approved ~nd encourage more development of residential units
replac ing industrial warehuuses ." A 45 ,000 squdre fool 111a11ufdLluri11g/warehouse
building currently occupies this site . Thi, project addresses the City's 3-part strategy
outlined in the 2003 Englewood Comprehensive Plan for Growth 2nd Developm en t
in the City; Revitalizatlcn, Redevelopment and ReinvPntion .
The project will bring new life into the area and provide a unique housing option for
res idents near an existing light ·ail station. The project takes advantage of existing
in(rasltucture and transportation options while IP.investing ir1 ;,n l!<istlng industrial
;ind established re~•dential neighborhood. The additional residents will take
advantage of the existing amenities in the neighborhood and generate tax revenue
thnt will bcneiit programs and services provicied by the City of Englewood . The
ir1ereased lax revenue will also benefit other laxi11g errlilies. most r1otably the Sd ,ool
District.
J.. /'he application ,s or is not consistent with adopted and gen erally ,Kcepted standards of
development in the City.
The t-Jav<1jo Apartnrerrts PUD i; consistent with adopted and generally accepted
devel or,rn P.nt standarrls established b\' the City of Englewood . The a ppl!c a '.,on was
reviewed b\' the City's Development Review Te 3m tDRT) and the aporopriate
outside agencies . All comments were addressed by the applicant .
. l Th e app lication is or is not substantially consistenl wit/, 11,e goals, uujel::ves. design
gu ideli11e ,. pulicif:!s an<.i anv other ordinance, law, or ,eq.,irt>m"'nr of rh~ Chy
The Na vajo Apartments PUD is substantially consistent with the goals, objectives,
design guidelines, policies, and ether ordinances, laws and requirements of the Ci ty.
The UDC requires that the revi~w or decision making body shall only ,,pprove a pro posed
PUD if it finds that the p'oposP~ rleveloprnent cor.1plies wi th all applical~le use,
development, and cesign standards set forth in the UDC that are not otherwise mociified or
waived according to the rezoning approval ; and the proposed re zoning mee ts one of the
following criteria :
il Thar ril e pro po<ed developmenr will exce ed the development qL'a!iry standard;, levels of
.oublic amenities. or levels of design innovation otherwise ap_olicable under this Title, and
wou ld not. be possible or practicable under a standard zone district with condition.ii uses
or with a re,,sonJble number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adjuslment5; or
The µropu~eu PUD will exceed the development quality standards requirPd hy the UDC
fnr industrial OP.VP.iopment as follows :
• The ex isting 1-1 Zone District allows more intensive land uses than the proposed
Ndvaju Apartmerits l'UD . The existing 1-1 Zone Distri ct has le~s restrictive
SPlhacks, height limitations. and landscaping requirements than the proposed
PUD.
• The ~DC has no requirements fo r buildings in an existing 1-1 Zone District as far
as : building artinrlation, variety of materials, building transparency, or
architectural character. ihe PUD proposes a greater level of building artic:ulatio11
including: a 3 foot minimum building plane change every 50 feet, a mix of
pattern and color changes, a miPimum 30 percent masonry requirement, and
clearl1• defined building entries.
b. That the property cam ,vi be de1·eloped, or that no reasonable economic use of the
property can be achieved, under the existing zoning, even through the use of condir.ional
11.1P., or a reasonable number of Zoning Variances or Administrative Adi usrments.
In addition to the two Planned Unit Development considerations above, the UDC requires
that a property rezoned to PUD must not have a significant negative impact on those
propert;e, sur rounding the rezoned are a and thal the general public health, r,afety and
welfa·e of the community are protecteu . St•ff has reviewed tlte PUD request and found the
following:
• The PUD application i5 in conformance with the Compreheni ive Plan and the
U11ified Developrnen! Code.
• The app lication is consistent with adopted and g~ncrally accepted standards 0 !
developr,ent in the Cily.
• The traffic imp,1eI ~\udy was rev ieweu by the Publi c Works Traffic Division and
COOT; both concurred with its lindings.
• The rezoned pror,erl)' will nol have a signi :'icant negative impact on those properties
surround ing the rezoned area and the general publi, health, safety ,tncl w elfare of
th e currrrrrurrity a:'e p,otected.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhrb1I A: ~avajc Apartments PUD
Exhibi t B: Neighborl1 ood Meeting Sumrna-y -November 15, 20 , 2
Exhibit C: Tri-County Heahh De.r,ar1111ent -Letter dated March 11 , 2013
Exhibit D: RTD -Letter elate~ M;.rd1 4, 2013
Ex: bit£: COOT Reg ion 6 -Lener da•.ecl february 21>, 2013
Exh,uir f . City of Sherid•11 -Lener dated March 6, 2013
Exhibit G: Xcel Energy -Lett er d:rted March 11, 2013
Exhibit H : Century Link -Leller ;lated April 10. 2013
Exhibit I: Addendum to Traffic. Impact Study-Dat~d Apr il 2, 2013
Exhibit J: iraffic Impact St.uc!y and Appendi x A
9
•
Navajo Apartments PUD
Neighborhood Meeting
4201 South Navajo Street
November 16, 2012
Attendees: Approximately 13 (see attached sign-in sheets)
Applicant Presentation
EXHIBIT B
1. Bryan Elsey of Elsey Partners, LLC, stated that he grew up in Denver, and then went
to Kansas State University with his brother Chris Elsey where they both studied
iandscepe architecture . After graduating, he and his brother started three
companies ; Prime Design, Prime Built, and Prime Place. The companies design,
build, and manage apartment buildings with a focus on sturient housing. To date
they have constructed 450 apartment units in Manhattan, l\ansas and 164 units in
Stillwater, Oklahoma. Bryan Elsey then introduced his father Bruce Elsey who owns
the subject property at 4291 S. Navajo St. and ran a cat litter manufacturing
company named Precious Cat there prior to moving his operations to a larger facility
in northwest Englewood.
2 . Bryan Elsey described the proposed development which indudes:
• 186 market rate one and two bedroom apartment units.
• A plan of 4 stories on top of a podium style parking design, redulting in 5 stories.
• The 4111 story includes some units with a loft that would add another story.
• The plan includes two interior courtyards, one with a pool .
• There are 209 parking stalls shown on the plan for the 166 apartment units .
• The developer is still working through some storm water issues.
3. Public Comment
The attendees asked questions and provided comments as follows . The applicant
responded to the questions and provided the following answers (in italics):
Who did your market study? Have you looked at the Alexan project in Littleton or
the Riverton project? A formal study has not been conducted at this time,
however, ,t appears there have been several new multi-family projects
constructed a/ona the light rail corridor line .
The property just south of 4201 S. Navajo St. manufactures paint booths.
What are the unit sizes and price per square fool? We anticipate 750 to BOO
square feet for a one bedroom. $900-$1000 monthly rent far a one bedroom,
$1,200-$1,300 for a two bedroom.
Is the entire building podium style parking? Yes, so the building would be 5 to 6
stories or about 68 feet al its maximum height.
Where will you do your storm water detention? We will use underground
detention?
Is there any landscaping around the outside of the property? There will be a
perimeter landscape buffer and higher-quality landscaping along the street.
There does not seem to be much landscaping, does it comply with City codes?
We a r'.:;/ng a PUD to create a mullt-unit resident/al development white providing
a landscape that works with ihe proposed development ,
Has this project been through the City's Development Review Team? We have
had a preliminary meeting with the City on our proposed concept.
Which direction does the drainage go? Water runs west to the railroad right of
way.
What are your parking ratios? In our project in Manhattan Kansas we had . 75
parking stalls per unit and the parking lot seems to be about 60% occupied at
any given time.
• Will a parking ratio that low push parking onto the streets?
, What is your timing fur construction? We're not sure yet, we are interested in
seeing how the Oxford Station PUD project to the north of us does .
Who is doing your civil engineering? Roth Engineering
4 . City staff outlined the PUD process and next steps. The PUO frequently asked
questions were provided.
5 . Bryan Elsey of Elsey Partners, LLC made some closing remarks and the meeting
was adjourned.
Sile: 4201 Navajo Street
PIP.ase Print
Name
~L8e-f/
i--f f,-1 t/-"f::3'R T
Planned Unit Development
Pre-Application Neighborhood Meeting
i".ovember 15, 2012
Address City Zip
Code
, =· .... ... 1 . ---,,., <'>l1)l • , • -V--,J --_ -j5-✓-:L:°x i 5,, -J I
/.,-1-fw
r~· .,t_,I ,-..,i)(jcJYI{:~ fOJJo
11 bb tv f,;l\co~11" Pl g'(J (/()
\ I 'I I II
•
•
March 11, 2013
Brook Bell
'fYTri-County ~ Health Department
City of Englowood
Community Develupment Department
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, Colorado 80110
RE : Navajo Apartments PUD
TCHD Case No. 2856
Dear Mr. Bell :
EXHIBIT C
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed Planned Unit
Development (PUD) application for the site located at 4201 South Navajo Street to allow
for 141 residential apartments close to the Oxford Station . Tri-County Health
Department (TCHO) staff has reviewed the application for compliance with applicable
environmental health regulations and potential recommendations for site improvements
to encourage opportunities for healthy community design .
Healthy Community Design and Connectivity
Because chronic diseases related to physical inactivity and obesity now rank among the
country's greatest public heellh risks , TCHD encourages community designs that make
it easy for people to include regular physical activ,ty, such as walking and bicycling, in
their uaily routines. At the project site level , TCHD encourages applicants to incorporate
a 1.11ell-connected system of pathways for pedestrians and bicyclists that support the use
of a broader pedestrian and bicycle network off of the site . The following comments
relate to the Information contained in the PUD regulations .
Land Uses
TCHD recognizes that the current proposal is for 141 residential units . However, the
PUD does not appear to list any allowable land uses. TCHD encourages the applicant
1o conside r how the project m ight accommodate a future request for a smell scale
neighborhood use like a community garden . Community gardens are an excellent way
in an urban environment to provide access for residents to healthy foods .
Setbacks and Building Orientation
The design and orientation of buildings can increase residents' use of sidewalks along
streets improving the safety on the street by bringing more people to observe activities.
TCHD commends the appl icant for the allowance for a zero setback for a portion of the
building and the requirement that 50% or the building be located at a 5 to 15-foot
setback . TCHD encourages the applicant to use 0t'.sign standards to articulate how the
building ra~de along the street should incorporate ~'ldestrian -scale design features .
Please see more comments about design standards in :,e next section of this letter.
Serv ing Adams , Arapahoe and Douglas Counties • Richard L. Vogl , MO, E)ecutl'le Director • www.tcho .org
6162 s . Wll!ow Dr .. Suite 100 T Gre. ,wood Village , CO 80111 T 303-220-9200
Navajo Apartments PUD
March 11 , 2013
Page 2 of 3
Design Standards
The proposed language under "Design Standards and Guides' does not translate into
specific requirements that will be easily enforceable when a proposed site plan on this
site Is evalw1ted. TCHD suggests adding more specific requirements to help articulate
the Intent of this section .
Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation
TCHD encourages the applicant to include more specific requirements to ensure an on-
site system of good connectivity for the proposed and any future development. The
proposed language under "Pedestrian and Bicycle Access and Connectivity" does not
translate into specific requirements that will be easily enforceable when a proposed site
plan on this site Is evaluated. In order to ensure that requ irements stated in the PUD
foster a walkable design that Incorporates direct connections between on-site amenities
anri the broader circulation network, TCHD recommends adding greater specificity for
loc..1tion, minimum width and design criteria of on-site sidewalks .
Parkini,• Standards
TCHD r:ommends the applicant for allowing for a 25% parking reduction if within ¼ mile
from a lransit station . This type of standard is becoming more common in TOD
standards In the Denver Metro region and helps support greater use of transit among
residents of the development.
•
Bicycle Amenities •
As mentioned ea rlier in this leller, TCHD supports community design that makes it easy
for residents to walk or use their bicycles. TCHD commends the applicant for Including
bicycle parking standards In the F'UD . The sita plan does not seern to show bicycle
facilities on the exterior of the building. While bicycle slorage for residents could be
accommodated internal to the building, it is important to include bicycle parking facllllles
that ere easily accessible to visitors .
Flammable Gas
The subject nroperty is located approximately 800 feet southeast of the former Arapco
Landfill . Fl:immable gas from landfill may pose a health and sa fety hazard to the
developmen,. Section 1 j Q6-2 of the City of Englewood Unified Devel opment Code
requlrei; flammable gas testing and approval for development located within ono
thousand feet of a former landfill.
Based on that requirement, TCHD recommends that the applicant work with a qualified
environmental consultant to prepare a flammable gas investigation plan for the site, to
be reviewed and approved by TCHD . Upon completion of the investigation , TCHD will
review the results and determine if it will be necessary to incorporate a flammable gas
control system(s) into the project. In addition, TCHD will determine whether construction
safety practices are necessary during construction on the site .
Sun Safoty for Outdoor Common and Gathering Areas •
Skin cancer is the most common cancer in the United Slates . Colorado has the s"'
highest death rate fr.>m melanoma, the most deadly form of sk in cancer . A leading risk
factor for skin cance r Is expo sure to ultraviolet rays (UV) lrom the sun . Se eking shade
•
Navajo Apartments PUD
March 11 , 2013
Page 3 of 3
when outside is one or the best ways to prevent overexposure to UV rays . TCHD
recommends the use of shade In common areas like courtyards , patios and play areas
through the planting or trees or physical shade structures. It Is important that shade
structures or appropriate landscaping is considered early in the design process so that ii
is incorporated well into the ovsrell site plan and optimizes the opportunity for residents
and visitors to shield themselves from the sun and reduce their risk of skin cancer.
Please feel free to contact me at (720) 200-1571 or slynch@tchd.org if you have any
questions on TCHD 's comments .
Sincerely,
Shella Lyn ch
Land Use Program Coordina1or
Tri-County Health Depanment
CC : Warren Brown, Hope Dalton. Vanessa Rir.harclson , Laura DeGoiier , TCHD
•
•
•
March 4, 2012
Brook Bell, Planner II
City of En~lewnod
Cnmmunity Development Depertment
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood , CO 80110
Ro : Ca•e No .: ZON2013-001 , Navoju Apartments
Dear Mr . Bell
Thank you for providing RTD with the opportunity to comment on the above referenced
case . RTIJ strongly sJpports this type of h igher-density development in the areas ad:scent
to light rail stations. Our one suggestion is as follows : it appears from the plans that the
sidewal~ along South Navajo Street is an attached sidewalk . So as to enhance the
pedestrian environment along South Nevajo to the Oxford Light Rail Station . RTD woulri
recommend requ iring a detached sidewal~. if possible .
Thank you again for the opportunity to comment on thi!li cRsa . Should you need additional
information, I can be reached at 13031 ~99-2439 .
Sincerely , ,~r
Chl'iti Quinn
Project Manager
c : Developm ent Review File :Englewood .
1600 Bltlkc Stre-c1, Denver, Colorllldo80202 • 303 .299 .0000 • rtd-<:tenvuu .. om Re,glonal Tran1portallon Dl1trtcl
EXHIOIJ E
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF COLORADi -Rcaion C, Tr,lffic
Acce,VUlilitl~ Pf.rm~(
R~sidc lldver1bing
2000 SOulh Holly S:1"1"1
Denver, Colorodo 00222
JC!J -Sl 2-41n FAX 30l-n7-9IR6
February 28, 2013
City of Englewood
Attn : Brook Bell
Community development department
1 000 Englewood Parkway
I::nglewood , Coloruuu 80110
Dear Mrs. Bell:
RF.: ZON1013-00I NAVAJO APARTMENTS 4201 SOUTH NAVAJO STREET AND SU (85)
CITY OF ENG .. i::wooo
Thank you for referring the proposal for our review. It does not aµp<:ar thal any work is to be performed
in CDOT right of way. If the proposal should chan11e to obtain pennission to construct utilitie!< withiJla.
state highway right-of-way , a Utility/Special Use Permit is required. Please visit our website ut •
http://www.dot.stalc.cu.us/UtilityPromm!Proccss ,cfiTI. or ohtain the Application through this otlice.
If you have any questions, plca.~e contact me at 303-512-4271.
Sincerely,
Bradley T. Sheehan, P.E.
Access Engineer
CC R6 · Ref: 022613 .do<X File (SH 44)
•
•
•
CITY OF SHERIDAN
410 1 S. Fedenl Bl vd.
Sheridan. CO 80110-4 3 16
303/762-2200
303/438-3398 Fu
EXHIBIT F
March 8, 2013
BrookBeU
Clly of Englewood
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood , CO 80110
Re : 4201 S. NaY11jo Stnlet
I Rtlewood, CO
ltlannecl Unit Development Amendment Refenal
Dear Brook :
The Clly of Sheridan la In reca lpl of lhe Planned Unit Development Amendment Roferral
for the Navajo Al)artmenla pro jtel localed at 4201 South Navajo Street , case number
ZON2013-001 . We hMle reviewed the propose! and have Ille follOWing comments :
1. IR this proposal modifying an ex isting PUO? The cover sheet referenced a PUO
amendment. If there is an exist ing PUO It should be clee~y referenced and its
reception number referenced .
2. Since the survey (S101) shows th is project on two lot&, will a subdiv ision action
be req ulred lo eliminate the lot line running through the middle of the project?
Alao, Is the sanlta,y easement owner ok w ith having tree s located In the parking
lot Islands with in close proxim ity to the e>dating sanitary sewer line?
3. Sheet A102
a. Shows two names for the project , Navajo Al)artmanta on the top of the
page, and 4201 S Navajo under the Intent.
b . Under the Intent statement It Indicates the Pl.JD mosUy complies with the
Comp Plan and Code . It would be nice lo know how it doesn 't comply as
part of this appl ication .
c. The intent portion ldentifiH the 'Oxford Transit Oriented Development.'
Is that a plan , a study or part of the recent Light Ra il Conldor Plan?
d. Under the 'Relationship to the Unified Coda' portion of the page , the
applicants have expressed an lnteresl In not having lhe PUD ever lapse.
Is th is permitted from a vested proporty rights standpo int?
e . The dimensional requirements show a 10' setback to the aouth aa the
requirement , but the stte plan shows perking to wlhin 4. 72 ' of the south
property line .
I. The sizes of the park ing spaces aro own at 8'8". The sile plan
dimensions them at 8 .5'. Should be eonaistont. At any rate, -apace less
than g• Is too mirrow. Suggest Increasing the parking apace sizes. This
will impact either the number of speces or the siie of tho periling lot
islands .
www .ci .shcridan .co .us
Brook Bell
March 8, 2013
Pagc2
g. We augg11t moro 1>ike racks be provided given Iha location and nature of
1h11 development.
h. Under "Landscaping and Seroonlng" ratios of trees and shrubs ara
provided per RLA . PleaA daflna what RlA Is.
I. The "Design Standards and Guldea' only states they will have high quality
articulated dealgns. More delall Is needed to understand their design
intent.
4 . Consistent page numbering on the plans would be helpful.
5. Sheet C101
a. Will tho oxisling chain Hnk fence remain on the north property Una? Givan
tho outdoor storage In that area, it makes senae for the appllca11ts to
provide more of a vi,ual acreen.
b. Site triangles should be shown at the vehicular entrances to Iha site.
c. Are the two small sidewalks shown sufficient to get pedestrians from this
site to Novajo?
d. The "drinking straw' looking element immediately west of the stte needs
to be idenlifled .
e. legend should Include romber of parking spaces.
6 . What l1 the so· easement on the west portion of the site for?
7. WUI one trash enclosure be sufficient for the number of apartmenla al this site?
Thank you for the opportunity to review this plan . Should any queatlons arise, please
either call me at 303-438-3307 or via ema il at Jhennlnger@ci .sheridan co us .
•
•
•
•
•
•
fl Xcel Energy ...
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
March 11 , 2013
City of Englewood Community Development
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood , Colorado 80 110
A tin : Brook Bell
Re: Navajo Apartments PUD, Case #ZON2013-001
Right of Woy & P1rmlt1
1123 wesl J.,. Avenue
Conver, ColOrajo 80223
Tol ...... no: 303.571.3301
Facalmlle : 303 . 57 , .3524
d0Ma.l .9eorge@xcelanergy .com
Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) has reviewed the plans for Navajo Apartments
PUD . Please be aware PSCo owns and operates existing electric distribution facilities within the
proposed project area . Public Service Company has no objection lo this proposed rezone,
contingent upon Public Service Company of Color&do's ability to maintain all existing rights and
this amendment should not hinder our ability for future expansion, includ ing all present and any
future accommodations for natural gas and electric transmission relol~d facilities .
Please be aware that depending on how the transformer cabinet will open the landscaping plans
may need to be adjusted to accommodate clearance requirements .
The property owner/developer/contractor must contact the Builder's Call Line at 1-800-628-2121
and complete the application process for any new gas or electric service , or modification to existing
facili ties including relocation and/or removal and associated costs , II is then the re5ponsibility of
the developer to contact the Designer assigned lo the project for approval of design details .
Additional easements will need lo be acquired by separate document for new facilities .
As a safety precaution, PSCo would like to remind lhe developer to call the Utility Notification
Center at 1-800-922·1987 to have all utilities located prior to any construction .
If you have any questions about this referral response . please co11t<1cl me at (303) 571-3306.
Sincerely,
Donna George
Contract Right of Way Referral Processor
Public Service Company of Colorado
April 10,2013
City of Englewood
Community Development Depanment
Mr . Brook Bell
I oun Englewood Parkway
Englewood, CO 80110
RE ; Case No.: ZON2013-001
4201 S. Navaj o St., Engle.wood, Colorado
Navajo Apartment~
Dear Mr. Rell ,
EXHIBIT H
Qwe st Corporation d/b /n CenturyLink QC hos reviewed the mnlerial s pro\"ided by thi s propo•al.
CemuryLink ha.~ no objection to the Cose.
•
However, please note that CcnruryUnk owr.s , operates and 1naintai11s tclc:communication cahlcs •
and lenninuls at the structure addressed above . The costs of ccnain modification tu or relocation
of said facilities may be billable lu the Rcquestor.
The Requester should contact CcnturyLink Field Engineer Tim Styron at
1iJ!lfil.Yron@cenl)1r\"link com, to arrange for the safe 1111d proper removal of any existing
CcntwyLink facilities and to discuss pl11Ming for nc:w facilitie; (including fiber) to serve thls apartn-,cnl development .
Thank you for the oppo11u ni1y to review lhe referenced Case .
Sincerely,
/tt.J._
Charles Plac e
Right of Wu y Manager
Century Link
7759 S Wheeling Ct.
Englewood, CO 80112
720.578 .5132
charlcs .plnce~centurylink .com
•
•
•
•
♦ SM ROCHA, LLD
TRAFFlt,; AND TRANSIPORTATION CONSULTANTS
April 2, 2013
Mr. Ladd Voslry
T raffle Engineer
City of Englewood
1000 Englewood Pkwy
Englewood, CO 80110
RE: Trame Impact Study -Compliance Letter
Navajo Apartments
Dear Mr . Voslry:
EXHIIIIT I
SM ROCHA , LLC prepared the February 2013 traffic mp;ict study (TIS) for Navajo Apartn,en\s and
the March 20 , 2013 supplemental traffic signal opera\lo~s information for Oxford Avenue anJ
Navajo Streat intersection . The basis for prepared Information was Na'l.ljo Apartments proposing
to construct approximately 130 residential dwelling units .
It is understood that the total number of dwelling un its pmJJOsed for construction has Increased lo
141 . Proposed site access to Nava;o Streat r~mak1s unchanged from that presented In the
Februar/ 2:l13 TIS .
Similar 10 the February 2013 TIS, standard traffic generation characteristics compiled by \he
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in Iha~ report entitled Trip Generation, 8th Ed ition, were
appl ied to the additional dwellins units in ocder to estimate the increase in average daily traffic
(ADT), AM Peak Hou·, and PM Peak Hour vehicle trips for sile development. A vehicle 1rtp is
defined as a one-way vehicle movement from a po inl of origin to a point al dest ination .
Trip generation rates used for comparison are presented in Table 1.
JT,E , . . •
OOE LANQUSE
220 ~mentl cu
ten. DU•o.tl/llUl'lll l
I 2:303 AIRPORT WAY, SUIT E 200 BROOMF'IELO, COLORAOO B002 1
0:13031327·1490 F':(3031 327·1499
WWW .BMRCCt-4.t..COM
Mr. Ladd Vost,y
NatfgA@lt/7!1!/11.1 -Im/lie Impact Study Compliance
Apntl. lfl13
Pigel
Table 2 illustrates projected average daily traffic (ACT), AM Peak Hour, and PM Peak Hour traffic
volumes Ukely generated by the addltlonal eleven (11) dwelling untts.
Table 2 ~urnmarizes that the additional dweling units will generate an increase of approximately 59
daily trips with 4 of those occurring during the AM Peak Hour and 5 during the PM Peak ltour .
Moreuver, the dlfferenca betwl'en pe3k hour trip generation ot 130 and 141 dwelling unijs results in
an increase In traffic generation of ap~rox imately eight pertcM. This minor Increase in site traffic
generati on Is not substantial en,>ugh lo create a negative impact to lraffic operations of the exisliny
surrounding roadway sysll!m or change interse~lion oporalional results presented in the February
2013 TIS .
II Is our professional conclusion that Iha propos<"I! 141 dwel ling units are in compliance with lhe
Navajo Apartmsnts TIS dated February 20 13, and alt recommendations presented in that study,
Including supplemental information, remain val id.
We tnist that our llndings will assist In approva! of the proposed Navajo Apartments development .
Please contact us should further assista nce be natded .
Sincerely ,
SM ROCl'A lLC n;;;;;;:z:sultonts
Mike ~ocha, TliUS. roes
Princ i;l.~I
R'!I. l20921()isc
•
•
•
EXHIBIT I
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
For
Navajo Apartments
Englewood, Colorado
February 2013
Prepared for:
Roth Engineering Group
7853 East Arapahoe Court, Suile ?500
Cent011nlal, Colorado 80112
12303 Airport Way, Suite 200
Broomfield , Colorado 80021
(303) 327-1490
Proj ect Manager/Eng ineer:
Mikr• ~ochA, TSOS , TOPS
Enginoe r in Respon&ible Charge:
Fred Lantz, PE
Ruf: 12·092101ls
•
Navajo Apartments
fa1ffic Impact Study
Project Overview
February 2013
I. Introduction
This traffic impact study addresses the capacity, geometric, and control require-
ments associated with Navajo Apartments . This proposed residential
development is located on South Navajo Street between West Oxford Avenue and
West Quincy Avenue in Englewood. Colorado.
Study Area Boundaries
Through coord;nation with City Slaff, the study area to be examined in this
analysis encompasses the Oxford Avenue intersections with Santa Fe Drive and
Navajo Street.
Figure 1 illustrates location of the development site and study intersections .
Site Description
Land fo r the development accommodates a light industrial building and is
surrounded by a mix of com111ercial, light industrial , retail, office and res idential
land uses . The proposed development is understood to entail the construction of
approximately 130 multi-family residential units .
Primary access to the develo pment is provided at the following locations : Two full-
movement accesses onto Navajo Street.
For purposes of this study, it is assumed that development construction would not
be phased and completed by end of Year 2015 .
The conceptual site plan as prepared by Roth Engineering Grou p is shown on
Fig ure 2 .
SM ROCHA , LLC
Traffi c and Transp ortat ion ConsultAnt s Pag e t
Figure 1.
SIT E LOCATION
•
..
SMRCX:HA, LLC
Navajo Apanmenta
Traff',c Impact Study
Engawood , Colorado
February 2013
North m ....s.
Figure 2
SITE PLAN
Navajo Apa1tme11ts
Traffic Impact Study
Existing and Committed Surface Transportation Network
Febru11ry 2013
Within the study aree, Santa Fe Dr,ve, Oxford Avenue and Navajo Street are tne
primary roadways that accommodate traffic to and from the proposed
development. A brief description of the roadways is provided below :
Santa Fe Drlye IUS85l is a north-south State Highway c,ving six through
lanes (three lanes in each direction) with exdusive t11ri ,' ,c:s at
Intersections within study area. Santa Fe Drive also i,rn v,des for High
Occupancy Vehicles (HOV) lanes during morning a,1-rl ·1,,rnoon peak traffic
hours. The posted speed on Santa Fe Drive is 55 MPH .
Oxford Avenue Is a two lane. east-west roAclway with a combination ol
exclusive or shared through and turn lane configurations. This roadway has
a posted speed limit of 30 MPH .
•
Navajo Street Is a roadway similar to Oxford Avenue. This north-south
roadway provides local access to the proposed development and adjacent
land uses. This roadway also hos o posted speed limit of 30 MPH . North
of Oxford Avenue, the street name of Navajo Street changes to
Windermere Street. •
The Oxford Avenue intersections of Santa Fe Drive and Navajo Street are
signalized. All other study intersections operate under a stop-controlled condition .
A slop-controlled inlt1rsection Is defined as a roadway Intersection where vehicle
rights-of-way are controlled by one or more "STOP" signs.
No regional or specific improvements for the above d.iscribed roadways are
known to be planned or committed at this time. The study area roadways are built
to their ultimate cross-section .
It is further understood that regional pedestrian connections are being studied as
part of the Oxford Light Rail Station area planning process currently underway
between the City of Englewood and Regional Transportation District (RTD).
Recommendations for pedestrian connection improvements are forthcoming .
SM ROCHA, LLC
Traffic aml TransJ)ortallon Consultants PagR4
•
NavRjo ApartmenlR
Traffic Impact St~dy February 2013
II. Existing Traffic Conditions
AM and PM Peak Hour traffic counts , as presented in the adjacent traffic study'
prepared for the Oxford Station Development, were collected at the Oxford
Avenue intersections of Santa Fe Drive and Navajo Street, and utilized in th is
analysis . These counts were adjusted to reflect one year of growth and are shown
on Figure 3.
The Signalized and Unsignalized Intersection Analysis technicues , as published in
the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) by thA Transportation Research Board and
as incorporated into the SYNCHRO computer program , were used to analyze the
study intersections for existing traffic conditions . These techniques allows for
determination of interseclion Level of Service (LOS) based on the congestion and
delay of each traffic movement. Base signal timing data for the Oxford Avenue
intersections of Santa Fe Drive and Navajo Street was obtained from City Staff
and used throughout this analysis .
The LOS analyses results for existing cond itions are summarized in Table 1.
Definitions of Levels of Service are given in Appendix A, and capacity worksheets
• are provided in Append ix B .
•
' ' '
'
I . ~ LANE •GRCiUPS ,,
· AM ,PEAK,,HOUR P"-1 ,PEAK HOUl'l ,
Santa Fe Drive/ Oxford Avenue (Signalized) 0(38.2) 0 (49 .7)
Oxford Avenue I Navejo Street (Slgnellzed) 8(15.1) 8(18.1)
Kar . S lgna6zl2d l11tem1cdons : l.eV !I of Servi:e {Ce ntro! Delay in sec/veh}
Existing Traffic. Analysis Results
Under existing conditions, operational analysis shows that the signalized
intersection of Santa Fe Drive and Oxford Avenue has an overall peak hour
operation at LOS D. The intersection of Oxford Avenue and Navajo Street
operates at LOS B, overall . in peak traffic hou rs .
1 ·odord Station, Traffic lmpad Analysis·. Felaburg Hdl & Ullevig, Jul~ 5, 2012 .
SM ROCHA, LLC
Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 5
162/24Q~
~/34ti--+
135/318-.
L:~ t~ ~~ ..-ittt·?
,, ~ 1 / /-----=-·
t...2991267
◄-252/ 4<18
,97 / 237
♦ SMROCHA. LLC Navajo Apar1ments
T raffle hn~act Study
Englewood, Colomdo
Febn,ary 201:1
Oxford Avenue
(17,825)
◄-215/97 ♦
317 /370➔
1,e,192, •
Figure 3
EXISTING TRAFFIC
Volumes & Intersection Geometl):.
AM/ PNI Peak Hou
(ADT): Average Daily Traffic
•
•
Navajo Apartments
Traffic Impact Study February 2013
Ill. Future Traffic Conditions without the Proposed Development
Normally, an annual growth rate is applied to existing troffic volumes to account for
projected Increases in background traffic for the short and long term analysis
horizons . This is done to consider Intersection operations and public roadway
Improvements possibly needed to accommodate regional transportation demands.
To account for projected increases In background traffic for Year 2015, a
compounded annual growth rate of approximately 1.59 percent and 2.54 percent
was applied to Oxford Avenue and Navajo Street, respectively . These growth
rates were used to be consistent with the Oxford Station traffic analysis . Also
included in background traffic volumes ere projected site-generated traffic volumes
from the Oxford Station development. No long term (Year 2035) background
analysis was considered In this study since the public a rea around Oxford Avenue
and Navajo Street is built out, and the expected completion of adjacent
development (e .g., Oxford Station) Is expected before Year 2015 .
Pursuant to the non-committed aroa roadway improvements discussion provided
in Section I along with Oxford Avenue and Navajo Street being built to their
ultimate roadway sections, Year 2015 background traffic cond~ion assumes no
roadway improvements to accommodate regional transportation denands. This
assumption prollides for a conservative analysis.
F igure 4 shows the projected background traffic volumes. including adjacent
Oxford Station dev,4opment traffic, and Intersection geometry (.,r Year 2015 .
SM ROCHA , UC
Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 7
167/251J
390/361 -•
139 / 328,.
c.;:f~ \:_ j •M t•i•
\ :i '---. I
_./~
t...337 / 291
• 264/464
• 1241258 Oxford Avenue
♦ SM ROCHA, LLC Navajo Apartments
Tralroc Impact Study
Englewood , Colorndo
Fe bruary 2013
226 ! 102...t
327 / 382-•
138 I 259 9
+ 11/8
•-406/528
,,10116
I
t fil
•
Figure 4
BACKGROUND TRAFFIC -YEAR 2015
Volumes & Intersection GeometrY,.
AM/ PM Peak Hou
(ADn: Average Daily Traffic
•
Navajo Aparlm11nts
Traffic Impact Study F11bruary 2013
As with existing traffic conditions, the operations of the study intersections were
analyzed under background conditions, without the proposed development, using
the SYNCHRO computer program. Background traffic level of service analyses
resulls for Year 2015 are listed In Table 2.
Definitions of Levels of Service are given in Appendix A, and capacity worksheets
are provided in Appendix B.
~anla Fe Drive I O.donJ Avenuu (Signalized) 0(42.0) D (54 .4)
Oxford Avenue I Navajo Street (Signalized) D (15.8) !I (\8.4)
Key: Slg n1faed lntmeetlcns : Ltvtl of Sorvk.e (Contto: Delay In !H11rlveh)
• Background Traffic Analysis Results -Year 2015
•
Operation analysis for Year 2015 background condition indicates that the
signal ized intersection of Santa Fe Drive and Oxford Avenue experiences an
overall LOS D operation during peak traffic hours.
Th1:1 signalized Intersection of Oxford Avenue and Navajo Street continue to have
an overall peak hour operation al LOS B, similar to existing conditions .
SM ROCHA, LLC
Traffi7, and Transportation Consultants Page9
Navajo Apartments
Traffic Impact Study
IV. Proposed Project Traffic
Trip Generation
February 2013
Standard traffic generation characteristics compiled ~y the Institute of Transporta-
tion Engineers (ITE) In their report entitled Trip Generation, 8111 Edition, were
applied to proposed land use in order to estimate average dally traffic (ADT), AM
Peak Hour, and PM Peak Hour vehicle trips for the dev(!lopmenl site.
A vehicle trip is defined as a one-wc1y vehicle movement from a point of origin to a
point of destination .
Trip generation rates used in th is study are rresented in Table 3.
ITE 24 '
CODE LAND USE . UNIT HOUR ENTER EXIT ,TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL
220 DU 6 .65 o.,o 0.408 0.51 0.403 0.217 0 .62
Ke y: OU • Ow911ing Units
Table 4 illustrates projected average dally traffic {ADT), AM Peak Hcur, and PM
Peak Hour traffic volumes likely generated by the proposed development.
ITE 24 AM PEAK flOUR PM PEAK HOUR
CODE LAND USE SIZE HOUH cNI ER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL
220 Apar1mt.t11ts 130 DU 665 13 53 uu 52 26 81
TOD Reduction• (-20%) 173 3 11 13 10 6 16
Tolal: 692 11 42 53 42 23 e..
SM ROCl-,A. LLC
Traffic and Transporlatio11 Corisuttams Paye 10
•
•
•
•
Navajo Apartments
Traffic Impact Study February 2013
Table 4 Illustrate that the proposed development has the potential to generate
approximately 692 dally trips with 53 of those occurring during the AM Peak Hour
and 64 during the PM Peak Hour.
Adjustment& to Trip G1,neratlon Rates
A development of this particular type is not likely to attract trips already on the
adjacent roadway system (defined by ITE Trip Generation Handbook as pass-by
trips). No pass-by trip reduction was taken in this study. However, the Oxford
Light Rail Station is localed within close proximity to the proposed development.
As such, a twenty (20) percent reduction was applied to site trip generation to
account for the llkellhood of transit use from a transit oriented developmen: (TOD).
This reduction percentage is considered conservative .
Trip Distribution
The overall direclional distribution of site-generated traffic was deter mined based
on proposed and existing aren land uses, allowed intersection turning movements,
and available roadway network .
Overall trip distribution patterns for the propo sed development are shown on
Figure 5 .
Project Trip Assignment
Traffic assignment is how generated and distributed vehicle trips are expected to
be loaded onto the available roadway network.
Applying trip distribution patterns to site-generated traffi~ provides the site-
generated trip assignments shown on Figure 5 .
SM ROCHA. LLC
Traffic and Transporta;ion Cons11ltRnfs
~ I -~-:· '8
;., ' #.-~,'
., I W' ; 'I ~
112 -•
ij
♦ SM ROCHA, LLC Navajo Apartments
Traffic Impact SIUdy
Englewood, Colorado
February 201 3
Oxford Avenue
I
I
~
Sita Access o
(Combined) ___________ ~_
38 121 ♦ 1
<12-.
ij
Figure 5
DISTRIBUTION
(%): Overall...
SITE-GENERATED TRAFFlt9
AM/ PM Peak Hour
Page 12
•
Navajo Aparlmants
Traffic Impact Study February 2013
V. Future Traffic Forecasts with Propoaed Development
Sile•generated traffic was added to b&iA ground traffic volumes to develop total
traffic projections.
For analysis purposes, it was assumed !hat development build out would occur by
end of Year 2015.
No roadway improvements were assumed i 'l' df,alysls in the total traffic condition.
Projected Year 2015 total traffic volumes and intersection geometry are shown on
Figure 6 .
SM ROCHA , LLC
Trame and Transportation Consultants Page 13
~3521299
<-26614&5
•1]71265 Oxford Avenuo
167/257~
391/363··•
139/328-..
♦ SM ROCH,._ U.C Navajo Apar1ment•
Traffic Impact Study
Englewood, Colorado
February 2013
(19,8601 •-• 226/ 102J'
327/3S2 ➔
146/288,
~~1/8
◄-405 1 52a
•• , 180
•
Figure 6
TOTAL TRAFFIC· YEAR 2015
Volumes & Intersection GeometrY,.
AM/ PM Peak Hou
(ADT): Average Daily Traffic
Page 14
•
•
•
Navajo Apartments
Traffic Impact Study
VI. Project Impact,
Peak ~our Intersection Level, of Service
Februa,y 2013
As with background traffic , the operations of the study intersections were analyzed
under projected total traffic conditions using the SYNCHRO computer program .
Table 5 summarizes total traffic level of service analysis results for Year 2015.
Defin itions of L1:1vels of Service are given In Appendix A, and capacity worksheets
are provided in Appendix B.
Sanle F• Drive/ Oxford Avonuo (Slgnollzod) C(!i4 .7)
Oxford Aven"n I Navajo Slreel !Signalized) 8 ('7.5) 8(18.9)
Key. Sl9n11ized lnltrtlCIIOns; Levtl of St rvice (Contml OOIIV In atclveh)
Total Traffic Analysis Results upon Davelopment Build Out
T able 5 shows that 1he signalized inter~ection of Santa Fe Drive and Oxford
Avenue , upon development build out with conservative assumptions defined in lhi~
study and by Year 2015, will have operations similar lo existing and backgrouna
conditions .
Table 5 f11r1her illustrales how the Oxford Avenue and Navajo StrePt Intersection is
p rojected to maintain LOS B operation during peak traffic hours .
SM ROCHA, LLC
Tralllc and Transportation Cro11su/la11/• Page 15
Navajo Ap erlments
Trafflc Impact Study
VII. Conclualon
February 2013
This traffic Impact study addressed tho capacity, geometric, and control require-
ments &~soclatad with Navajo Apartments. The proposed re~ldenllal development
Is located on Navajo Street between Oxford Avenue and Quincy Avenue In
Englewood, Colorado .
As coordlnatea with City Staff, the study area examined In th is analysis
encompasses the Oxford Av1mue Intersections with santa Fe Drive and Navajo
Street.
Analysis was conducted for critical AM Peak Hour and PM Peak Hour tn.iffic
operations for existing traffic cond itions , Year 2015 background traffic condltloris .
and Year 2015 total traffic conditions.
Analysis of existing traffic conditions ind icates that the studied signalized
Intersection of Senta Fe Drive end Oxford Avenue has overall peek hour
operation• et LOS D. Moreover, the signalized intersection of Oxford Avenue and
Navajo Street has overall LOS B operations during peak traffic hours .
Without the proposed development, Year 2015 background operaUonal analysis •
indicates Iha! study intersections will continue to experience moderate to good
traffic operations .
Analysis of future traffic conditions indicates that the add iti on of site-generated
traffic Is expected to create no dlscernable Impact to traffic operations of the
existing surrounding roadway $ystem. With all conservative assumptions defined
In this analysis, existing intersections along the Oxford Avenue study area are
projected to operate at future levels of service comparabl£ 1.o existing and
background conditions during peak traffic hours.
SM ROCHA. LLC
TrafRc and Tra11sµurtalio11 Consultants Pago 16
•
APPENDIX A
Level of Service Definitions
Tho following infanna1ian can be fowid in ~,c lliglwy_Capa_<i1)' M.m~i!L Transpana1ion Research •
Board, 2000: Choptcr 10 -Urban StreclS Conccpls Sign•liz<d h11mec1ion, and Chnp1er 17 -
Unsigr,islizcd lntc~o.:t iuns .
Level Of ~SQltt (LOS) for S\gnallztd lmcmli!!U~
Levels or service nrc defined to rcptC6Cnl remonablc range s in cU1 111v 1. Ut:ltay .
~
Doscribos oporn1ions wi1h law con~ul de\oy, up 10 10 slvch . Th is LOS 0<cu1s when progl'cssion is
extremely fnvomble and mosl ,•eh i .. i~-. ; rrive during the green ptira ~i: Mon)' vchic:lcs do not stop at all.
Shon c yclr. length~ mny lend to conuibu,c lu lo"' d~loy values .
!.QU
Describes ui:" 111,,113 wilh contr ol oolny err.Aler then 10 and up 10 20 s/vch . Thi , level gcnerolly
occu~ with KOU\! .,rogrcss io:u, short C)'.'."\:-l,1 ng1h~. nr hnlh . More vrhiclt'S stop than with LOS A,
causing l1i"h1:1 lt:v!j ls nf delay .
~
De scribes opc:rutions with control delay ~r~tcr thun 20 1md up 10 35 s/vch l11esc hii:her delays m11y
re sult from on ly foir progrC!sion , longer cycle leugtli s, or both . Individu al cycle fnilurcs ma y bc&in to
appear at the level. Cycle failure occurs when o apvcn green phase do~ not scr-.c ttucucJ vehicles, and
o\·erflows occur. The number or vehit:les stopping 13 significunt .11 this lc\'cl, though many still pas)
lhrough th e in tc i'S ecli on without slopping .
~scribes opernlians wilh control dclny r,rclilcr than 3S and up to 55 slveh . Al LOS D, the influence •
of l:Ull~c:stion becomes more noticeable . l.onecr d~lny!; mny resull from u,me combination of
unf11vo n1blc pro~n:ssio n, long cycle len&ths . and hi.:h v/c ratioi;, lnrl1vid :1al cycle foilures are frequent.
L!!U
De scri bes opcrotions w;~., control delay ~n:a1c1 Um ., 55 und up 10 80 s/vch . These high deloy values
generally indico1c poor progn.ssion, long cycle length s, a1KI hi~ we ratios . Individual cycle failures ore
frequent .
!&il
Describes opera tio ns with control delay in e,i.ccss of80 sl \'ch . This level , ccinsidercd uuacceplablc to
mm t <lrivr.rs , nflcn occ urs with over saturation . 1hat is , when arrival now rates c.1<cccd th e capacity of lune
groups . It 11Hl.)' al so or.c ur 11 1 high v,'r ra tios with many individ ual C)'tle failures . Poor progress ion nnd
Jone cy cle lcng1hs may al~o ,:ontrib111c s1gnilicanlly 10 high delay lc,tls.
1.e,·el nf Srrvtrr ILUSl for Unslgngli1cd TWSC lntorscctions
Level of Service Average Control Delay (slveh)
A 0 • 10
B , to . t5
C > 15 · 25
D > 25 • 35
E > 35 • 50
F > 50 •
•
•
•
Pl:.1nmj ;md Zonin1 Cu1nrnlnK.1 11
f'ubhc I lea.rin&
Cue hZONl0ll •OOI , 4!01 S \l;,,•Jjo S1rec1 (NI\DJC Ap:utn'lcnls rUD)
May 14, 2013
P~t'" I nf 6
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
May 14, 2013
Minutes and audio are available at :
http://www .englewoodgov .org/lndex . asp x ?pa gc= 15'.?
I. CALL TO ORDER
The rcgclar mee ting of th e C,ty Plann ing and Zoning Commission was c~lled to order at
7:00 11 .111. i11 th~ City Council Chambers ol the Eilglewood Civic Center, Chair Brick
pres iding.
Pr esent:
Ab se111:
Sl.lff :
l?1l
Bleile. Roth , Kins, Welke,, Knc,t 1, (e nt ered al 7:05), Brick, Kinion, Tow nl ey
fish, Freem irc (al ternat e), [xcus~d
1\lan White, Co,Ttmun1ty Development Director
Chris Neubecker, Senior Planner
Brook Bell, Pl a.nner II
N~ncy Reid, Assistant City Attomcy
II. Al'l'l!OVAL Of MINUTES
lv'ay 7, 2013
Roth moved :
Kinton se cond ed : TO APPROVE l HE MAY 7, 2013 MINUTES
Cha ir Rr ick asked if there were any modifications nr corrections . There were none
AYES :
\JAYS :
A,8Si'Ali'.:
ABSENT :
Roth, Welker, King, Br ick, Kinton, Townley
None
RIP.ilP.
Fis h, Knoth
Motion carried .
Ill . PUBLIC HEARING
!?Ji
CASE ZON2013 -001 , NAVAJO APARTMENTS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Planmns ,md Zo1li 111 Cu11u1 u)siu.1
P:1bhc Hl'flnn!!
C.i~.: ,.ZO:"\2013 ·001, 4201 S S.iv:i.1i> S!rt:t \!\°l\'~O Ap.;,n:r,;::,t) i"LLJJ
Moy t•. 2013
Po1e 2 of6
Welker moved :
Ble ile secuded. TO OPEN THt PlJRI IC: HEARING
AYES:
NAYS :
ABSTAIN :
ABSENT:
l:lleile, Koth, Welker, King, Brick, Kinion, Townley
"'u 11e
None
Fish, Knoth
Motio n carried .
Mr. ~oth noted he wanted to make a statement that he sh ares th e same surname as the
enginee,ing firm on this project, bu : is not aware of any relationship to them .
Mr. Bell , Planner II, was sworn 111 and prese nted the case . 1-lighlights of the proposed PU 0
Include:
• Rezoning irom I 1 Light Industrial District to Ma·,aj o /\partments Planned Un il
Development to allow a maxi:i,um o f 146 residential apartment unit!.
• Property is located mid-block on the 4200 block of So .1th Navajo Street and
is ;ipproxim;itely 800' south of" !'D's Oxford Light Rai l Stat ion
• Land to the south and east of the subject property is 7.oned 1-1 Li ght Industrial.
Land to the north was recently rezoned to th~ Oxford Station TOD PUD .
Land to the west is not within the C ity of Englewood limits .
• The subject property is owned by the Developer's father and ,,.,as the fo1mer
location of his cat litter manufacturing conpany that moved to a larger
facility in northwest Englewood.
• M ulti-unit dwellin gs arc not permitted in the 1-1 zone district; properly canno:
be redeveloped for residential under this zoning.
• Tl11, aµµlicant conducted the required neighborhood meeting on Novembe1
15, 2012. Notice was mailed to property owners and occupants of property
within 1000 feet oi the site .
Final PUD documents were sub mitl :I on April 29, 2013 .
• The proposed l"UD was reierred to Tri -County I lealth, RTD , the Colorado
D~pdrlrnent of Tr dnsµurtation, th~ City uf Sh~r idan, Xcel Euergy, Century Link
and Comcast; ther e we re no ohjPct1om ro th P project.
• The f'UD would include a maxiMum of 146 residential apartment un;ts.
• Majority of the parking is on the suriace with a portion tucked underneath
the second story of the building.
• Site Plan includes bndscaping and all new and existing utilities within the
property and abulling right-of-way will be placed underground .
• All permitted industria l u ses must ceJse once J Ce ,tificate of Occupancy fo r
any residential or commercial use is issued for any portion of the property.
• ArchiteLtural Character, Residential Densily and Setba cks were reviewed.
•
....
•--
•
•
•
• J'lannmg and Zcning Commission
Publi c Heari ng
Cue #ZON201 l-00 1, 4201 S N•,·ajo S•eo• (Na,ajo Ap:irtmems l'UD)
May 14, 2013
P,ge 3 016
• The maximum allowed building height for residential uses is 7 5 feet. Th e
maxir.ium ~ll owed building height in the PUD for Public/Institutional Uses,
Commercia ! Uses, and lnduwial Uses is 100 fer.t.
• The proposed Navajo Apartmept ; PlJ[i requ !res 1 parking space for each
uni t, plus 1 guest sp ace for every 10 u niu.
• The Navajo Apartments PUD will provide I bicycle space for every 5 units lo
t 2 accommodaied with bike racks .
• A Craine impact study was performed for tne project. The study was re v iewed
by the Publ ic Works Traffic Division d11u CDOT ~11t! they cu11rnrreu w ith its
fi :1dings.
• The Navajo 'lpartments proposes a minim um of 15% of the property be
landscaped and over 73% of th at will be "living" landscape.
• Par k dedicat ion fee w ill be approximatel y $5 4,400 .
(ijJ Q ue sti ons from Commissio ~
• Have all Staff concerns b een tak er. care ofl
• Arc size s of parkir.g s~a cc s an issue?
• Does property fall within I 000 feet of a former l1ndfill!
• Is there any kno w n contamination 011 sit e?
• Is r rking along Nava10 Street going to be allo w ed afte r thi s development is
completed?
• Does tne Code pe rtaining to lands caping mainten ance and replacem ent
apply to thi s project /
• Why :s it imµortant to grant this f'U U now rather than wait till the light Rail
Co rridor Plan is complete?
• Does this PUD meet the mini mum si ze for a PUD in te rms of overall area ?
• How does the property setb ack match up with the devel opment edge in
terms of th e prorerty to thP north ?
• What was the reason for increasing the he ight of the sign from 2 5' to '.;~'?
• If no work com m ence; w hen would th e PUD expire?
l?Jl Alan W hite, Di rector of Community Dev elopmen t was sw orn and st ated th eo proposed
Planned Unit D evelopment, in te rms o f land use and the density proposed, is c o nsistent
w ith the light rail plan that the City's consulmnts prepared . T~at plan i5 unofficial right no w ,
but St aff does plan on taking it through the adoption process and make it an ofti ci al ;ub-
are a plan of the City.
la Bry an Elsey was sworn in . He provided a brief background on his company and why
they chose this site for an infill development. He then showed a Po werPoint pres entation
on w hat their vision is for th~ project.
P:1nn1n1 and lon,;g. COftdT'Jsslnn
Pubhc Heann1
CiJ.~ •1.0~20·, ,.(.ttl. 4201 S :---n,·i;o StrCCl (~llVllJO Apa:1mcnu, Yt.:O)
May 1,.2013
l'::11c 4 of 6
Commission comments included:
• Will you rnanaije site after completion of project?
• How will you regulate accP.~~ to parking?
• What are your plans for snow storage?
• Where will the 55' sign be located?
• Have you considered roof top garifo11s?
• What is the area of the building footprint including the podium parking?
What is the height of the podium parkir
• Describe underground detention system.
Seems to be a lack of bicycle storage on sile .
• Internal sidewa lks see111 narrow .
• Are there plans to increase V,'ater anri sewer r.anac:ity aiong Navajo Street?
• What is the possibility o' a pedestrian bridge auoss O xfod Ave1ue to the
tnglewood Light Rail Station?
~ Katie Sukalski, 1 090 Urudll SI., Lak .,wuud, was swum in . She addres sed cc,:,cems
regdrding the layout for the underg round detention systen and the pres~nce of an ex isting
storm sewer sys:em in NavaJo S1ree1 .
2IJ Mike Rocha, Traffic Eng ineer was sworn in . He addressed q1•estions frorn the
Commission regarding pedestrian calculations.
PUBLIC TESTIMO.'IV
!al Peter Leising, 4561 S Jason Sl was sworn in . He addressed concerr:s regardin s
pedestrian connectivity, turn arrows, and the possibil ity of a pedestrian br idge over Sant :
Fe . He asl,ed about the timeline for t,e Oxford Station project. He felt the proposed
Navajo Apartments PUD project was a great improvement lo the 3rea .
~ Brook ad c're ssed questions posed by Mr. Leising .
181 Bryan Elsey s,u11111dliur1. He slateu they are excited lo b~ before the Pla1111i11[! and
Zoning Comm ission and would love to do the project. He said he feels the project fits t:ie
area and would appreciate the Commission's sup port .
Knoth moved :
Bleile seconded: TO CLOSE TH[ PUBLIC HEARl"G
,\YES :
NAYS :
Bleile , Ruth, Welker, Knoth, Kin~ Bric<, Kint on, Townley
None
•·
•
•
•
Plan nl na w1d Zuning Cu1111niuio11
Publi c Hea,ing
Cuc #ZON20Jl •OOI . 4201 S Navajo Street (N t,ajo Aptnmcnu rUD)
M,y 14, 2013
P,ge 5 of6
ABSTAIN : None
ABSENT : Fish
Motion r.arriP.ri .
Knoth moved :
King seconded:
~ Discussion
CASE #ZON201J.001 , REZONING Of 4201 SOUTH NAVAJO
STRffT FROM 1-1 {UCHT INDUSTRIAL ; TO A PUD (PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT) TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL USES BE
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO C/7Y COUNCIL WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
i Tlut th e final Navajo stJc el5 cape se ction may vary
from the curb aligr.men~ sidew,i/k widih ar.c/ lo ca tion,
and as sociated landscape zone s/1 uw11 un th~ PUO; d ll(I
that the iinal str eets cape secllor. for th e Nava10
Apanmer.ts PUD will b e appr oved by the City Manager
nr d1cs ign ee in conjunction with rhe building permit
The Comrnission members stated the project is the k ind of develop,sent they w,,nt for this
area , liked the concept or-::sented, tak es us closer to our gool s of having TO::> clevelopmer.t
near the City's traP,il stations, pruviu~s a11 opportunity for a different type of housing, the
developer 1s exrcrienced in th is type oi development and is the right density and ty'1e of
project ne er!eJ near a light ra ,I station .
Commi ssi o11 member'; co:,ce11 ,s i:1cluded width of internal sid ew alks, bicycle storage,
utilities, street development, pedestrian con ~ec tivity and will public art be included in the
proj ect.
AYES .
NA YS:
ABSTAIN :
ABSENT :
llleile, Roth, W~lker. K11cth , :<i n~, Brick, Kinion. Tc w nl ey
None
N c ne
Fi sh
Motion carried .
IV . PUBLIC FORUM ia·
No or~ wished to address the CommissiPn .
V. ATTORNEY'S CHOICE
~I
Ms. Reid had nothing further to report.
t'la.,nina amt Zomna Ccnuruss,on
Public Hc:aring
Cc.,: #20~201:\-001. 4101 S :-.::i>Jajo $trcr.t (Nn>J~jn Ari:1rtmmb Pl:D)
M,y 14 , 2013
P1g,1: 60' s
VI . S(AFF'S CHOICE
Ii
Directe r White stat'?d the Mr. Roth's Utizen of the Year celebration at the Malley Cente r
was VP.r~ :,ice.
Upr.o m in-.1 meetings include:
VII.
~<dy 2 1":
lune 4"':
june 17"':
l~ne 18'":
Cancelled
Study Session, Brewerie s, Distilleries and Win e rie s
Joint meet,ng with C ity Council to d iscuss the C omprehensive "la·.
Cancelled
COMMISSIONER 'S CHOICE
Th e members congratul a t e d Mr. Roth's appointment as En glewood's Cit iz e ·1 of the Year .
The rn eeli11g a djourned at 8:40 p .m .
•
••
•
•
•
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF CASE #ZON2013-001 )
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS )
AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TME )
REZONING OF 4201 S NAVAJO STREET )
FROM 1-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) TO A PUD )
(PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) TO )
ALLOW RESllJENTIAL USES )
INlllATED BY:
Elsey Partners, LLC
1532 College Avenuo, F19
Manhatlan, Kansas 66502
)
)
)
)
)
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF THE
CITY PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION
Commiss io n Members Prese nt :
Comm ission Members Absent
Bri ck, l(nr-th, Roth, Ki ng, 13 Ieile , Kinton, Town ley , W elk er
Fish, Freemire (alternate)
This mane, was heard before the City Planning and Zoning Commission on May 1 4, 20 I 3,
i11 th e City CoL11icll Chambers of the Engl ewood Civic Cent ~r.
Testimony w~5 re~e ived from Staff, the ap plicant and the public . The Comn ,is.ion recei ve d
notice of Public Hearing, Certification of Pos t ing, and Stafi Report from Staff, which were
i11wrµur ated inlo and made a p an of the record of the Public Hearing .
.'Ifi e-co nsi cle rin e statements of the w itne sses , and rev iewing the pertino?nt documents, the
memb ers of the City Planning and Zoning Commission rr.ade the following Fin d ings and
Con clusions .
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THAT the l :Jr,lication w as filed by Elsey partners , LLC seeking appro val to rez one
42 0'1 South Navaj r Stre et from 1-1 (Light Industrial) to PUD (Pl anned Un it
Development) t.o allow residentia l us es.
2. THAT Pu blic i'>otice o f the Public Hearing was given by publication in the
f!i glewo_aj ~ierald on April 26 , 2013 and was on the City's website from April 18,
2013 thr ou gh May 14, 2 01 3.
J. THAT the prop,my wa s posted as required, said posting selling torth the date, time,
and place of th1! Public Hearing .
4. THAT pursuant to the Planned Unit Developm~nl ;:irocedure, a pre-application
meeting was held with Staff in the fall of 20 12 and the application was reviewed by
City Departments and other affected outside agencies.
5. THAT pursuant to the Planned Unit Development procedure, the applicant
conducted a neighborhood meeting on November 15, 2012 .
6. Tl'IAT notice of !he neighborhood meeting w .. s mailed to property owners and
occupants of property within 1000 feet of the ~ite .
7. THAr the final Navajo Apartments PUD packet was submitted on Apr il 29, 201 3.
8. THAT the PUD would allow a maximum of 146 residen'.ial apartment units on the
property.
9. THAT the applica111 will provide 1 park111g space for each unit. plus 1 guest space for
every 10 units.
10. THAT the applicant w,11 provide 1 bicycle sµace for every 5 un its to b~
accommodated with bike rack;.
11. THAT tile traffic impact stucy was review ed by the Public Wor:<s Traffic Division and
CDOT; both concurred wit~ its findings.
12. THAT Planner Bell testified the request is for the r;,10n ing of 4201 South Navajo
Street from 1-1 (light industrial) to a Pl.Jr) (Planned lJ nit Developmem) to allow
resid en tial usF!s . 111.r. Bell testified to the criteria !he Comrrission must co nsid er whe,,
reviewi~g a PUD applic~tion. Mr. Bell further testified that Staff recommends
approval of the amendment w,tl, one condition.
13. THAT the Navajo Apartments Planned Unit Development is in conformance with
Roadmap Englewoutl : 2003 Englewood Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSIONS
1. THAT the application was filed by Elsey Partners, LLC. seeking approval to rezone
4201 South Navajo Street from I• l (light industrial} to a PUD (Planned Unit
Development} to a.llow residential uses.
2. THAT prupf:!r notification of the date, time, and place of the Public H F!ar ing was
given b y publicalion in the offic'al City newspaper, posting on the City's website and
by posting of the property for the required lengih oi ti me.
3. THAT all testimony received from staff mf:!mbers, the applicant and the public has
been made part of the record oi the Public Hearing
2
•--
•
4, THAT the request mee:s the criteria for a PUD.
5. THAT the PUD is a positive improvement for the property and is the best use for the
site .
6. THAT all permitted Industrial uses must cease once a Certificate of Occupancy for
any residential or commercial use is issued for any portion of the property.
7. THAT the proposed Navajo Apartments Planned Unit Development is i11
conformance with Roadmap Englewood: 2003 Englewood Comprehensive Plan.
K. THAT the Navajo Apartments PIJD is s11bsta11tially consistent with the goa ls,
O:ljcctivcs, design guidelines, policies, and other orcinances, laws a,,d req~ireme:i ts
of the City .
DKISION
THEl(EI-ORE, it is the decision of the City Planning and Zoning Commission tha t the
application filed by Elsey Partners, 1.1 .C: for th ?. rP1ni1ing nf 47.01 ~rn11h i'-av;i;o 5trePI frnm 1-
1 (light industrial) to a PUD (Planned Unit Development) to allow residential u ses be
recommended l o City Council for aµµroval.
The decision was reached upcn a vote on a motion m;idP. al th e mee •ing nf th e (ii\'
Planni r g and Zoning Commission on May 14, 2013, by Mr. Kicoth, seconded by Mr. Ki ng,
which motion stales:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN :
ABSENT :
CASE #ZON2013-001, REZONING OF 4201 SOUTH NAVAJO STREET FROM
l-1 (LIGHT l"1DUSTRIAL) TO A PUD (PLANNED UMT DEVELOPMENT) TO
ALLOW RESIDENTUL USES BE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO CITY
COUNCIL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
I . That thr • final N;ivajn st rPPl.<r;ir>P. <Prtinn may v;iry irnm thP c urb
a,ign111en1, sidewalk widch and locJlion, and ,mociated landsca pe u,,,e
shown on che PUD, arid thai 11,e final s!Jeeucdpe sec 1io 11 for 1h e Navajo
:'ipartment.s PUD will be approved by che City Manag , · o r r/esign ee in
con;uncc,on with ch ,· building permit.
King, Knoth, Roth, Bleile, Welker, Townley, Kinton, Br i:k
None
None
Fish
The motion carried .
3
These Fi ndings and Conclusions a re effoct ive as of the meeting on May 14, 2013 .
BY ORDER OF THE CITY PLANNIN~ ZONING COMMISSION
(7 (t/Jrew:/:
4
•
•
•
•
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 20 I 3
BY AUTHORITY
COUNCIL BILL NO . 21
INTRODUCED BY t:UUN<.:IL
MEMBER ____ _
ABll.LFOR
, . JRDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF 420 I SOUTP. NAV AJU STREET t'ROM
1-1 TO NAY AJO APARTMENTS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUDJ.
WHEREAS, Bruce Elsey 1111d 420 I South Navajo LLC nre the owners oflhe propeny at mid-
block on the 4200 Block or South Navajo Street between Oxford Avenue to the Nonh and Quincy
Avenue !o the Sou,h, als~ kno\Vfl as 420 I South Navajo Street, Englewood, Colorado; ond
WHEREAS, the 4201 South Navajo Streel site consists of1wo parcels totaling 2.09 acres; end
WHEREAS, Elsey Pnnncrs, LLC submilted :,n application to the City to rezone the porcels
from 1-1 Light Industrial District lo the Navajo Apanmcnts Planned Un it Development (l'UD)
which allows various residential, commercial and industrial uses; and
WHEREAS, th• propeny is approximately 800 feet South ofRTD's Oxford Light Rail Station;
anC
WHEREAS, land to the South and Easl or the subject propcny is zoned 1-1 Light Industrial
IJistrict and contains industriol uses ; lond to the Nonh of the subject propeny was recently n::wnc:d
to the Oxford Station Transi t Oriented Development PUD which will include 252 residential
apanment units with an option for mixed commercial uses: and
WlillRllAS, the proposed PloMcd Unit Development (PUD) would allow a mw<imum or 146
residential apartment units on the property , ahhoul!iJ the currclll buildina plan shows 141 units; and
WHEREAS , all allowed industrial uses shall cease and shall not be grandfathered nor
cnnsirlercrl lezal , non-confonning uses upon the issuance or a CertitkateofOccupancy: and
WHEREAS , the proposed 4201 South Navajo Street Pl1111ncd Unit De velopment will exceed the
development quality standards required by the Englewood Uuitio<l Dcveloprnenl Code for
residential development ; and
WHEREAS, the Plannine and 7.oning Commi<sion held Public Hearin~ on May 14. 2013 .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE .IT ORDAINED BY Tiffi CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS :
~-The 420 I South Navajo Pl.,1tl .ed Unit Development (PUD), for propeny located in
the 4200 Block of South Navajo Street between Oxford Avenue 10 the Nonh and Qu incy Avenue
to the South, in the City of Enalcwood, Colorado, altllchcd hereto •• F.xhibit A, i, hereby opproved
with the condition noted below:
That the fi1U1l Navnjo streetsc:ape section may wry from the curb
alignment, sidcwolk width ond location, 411d ossociatod landscape 20ne
shown on the PUD; and thot the final stroetscape section for the Navajo
Aponments PUO will be opproved by the City Manager or desifillee in
conjunction with the building permit,
Introduced , read in full, ond paned on first reading on the 3rd day of Septemhrr, 201 3.
Published by Tille as• Uill for an Ordmnnce i" the City 's ofilcial newspaper on the 6th day of
September, 2013 .
l'ublished ns a Bill for an Onlinance on the City's official website bcaiMlng on the 4th duy of
September, 2013 for thirty (30) days ,
Randy r . rcnn, Mayor
ATTEST :
Loucrishi• A, Ellis , City Clerk
I, 1..oucrish,u /\, Elli s, City Cl<tk of the City of Englewood , Colorado , hereby cer1ify that the
obove und foregoing is • true co~ y of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced , read in full, and passed on
first reodir,g on the 3rd day of September, 201 J .
l.oucrish ia A. Ellis
•
•
,. i'~l'(l.t,~ .)1 U.N!JI ;,.:,1; It-II •N 1•11 .... l\J l ltt J.::· ·J(1,1iP.TEf; e r SEC IIOFf O,I 1(1.f,'f~•,•tli' ~ C:OUht
IUUU!:l;il 'M:~I Of T·•f. ',to,l..,P!.NCIPP.L UERICl~N
1,.11 , 0-l !l(',t.['/,000 COl."fYOt i1,jl ,1,p 1,010E $."-.E(lf C0..0Jl "'0·,)
•:!JI ~\)JI U ~lf.\' ... J() ~Tr}[f l
~: ::~·::~\~·;_~-:~~~·--:·~~-':.: .. ,-:: ~ -~ .: ;:.-:. -~ ·, ~-~ --~ :~~: -~-:. :_
·•--.... --. ·-
......... ,C-..hlll -• _-";::::,;-,,.;_•-_; ;,._. ;"., -• '.'
,_ ............ ,~, ..... _
::: .. -:::..·::..·: ·-:::.•.:·.-•_:;··: ::. . ....... ,, ____ .. , ... --. ........ --
···-. ., __ ., -·-..
-· . . .. . . ___ ,._ .. -
l'AACl!I Of" L"HO LOC ATE :>IN TI--P. 50UfHE-'£l OUAH rEt-0FSEt::11Vll
0,1 , rc)'MNattlP ~ $CVfH, Mt.GE. G\1 'o\!ST of TttE ~X1H F'fl.lNCIPAI. MCAl,:"IIAtl
CIT Y er ENGt.E'.\'000. COt.l tlTY er l,R/,l>A.HOE S IA rro r OOLOnAOO
.t;>O I SOUT'Ht/JI V,l}O~Tf1H 1
I .. ,-
"''"'~1:LUf .._~'l :.HUl.ollt-ll (,1 I ◄ M11111 1•4'il o u•AT[R Of SECI O P◄04 IO~St-11"4.I 5:,ot 1,.
R,\NGF.~'/JUT (lf" l tlt:So!Al tt ""'l•t.CIIJ,'L P~:'i.lUl"-N
,:1 • f t n (',1 I ~V,JUI) t;Cl:UT YCt olA ,\P,l,--04!.gTAt[o • COIOHl\00
4.')I SQu'it1t1 \V4J06TPr n
,I ....
'P,\ll t:.t l j r t.J.11:> LCY.,HEO 1/1 hff SO.HIii AJ,,r f'l llAIH~Jl o r $£0:T IO'.O,I 10'11, IP ., ~Ql•T••
1,1-'1'-X "Ill WC 5 1 OF l 11(? s,, 1 •1 ;,,~1"1< 'l'AI MtPl,-.IAI,;
C"1T q 'II' t,G.E~'.-000 ((),!fl ;\ 1),l"&.RM-'A1&()[ ST&T[Cr ~OlOft!I
•:-t'l S l,f"t• P,A,,,\.l\)R,"1((1
• I , "·'j
,--.,_ ..
J~~-1
• I
,1 1.-'·
I
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
:,,11.,~c CLOr \,J t,O OC>,"L Olt/1!11 80U'Tt•[AS1 UIJ AATlll ()I !:ICTION C .. t OWU \l,r 5[,(JtJl•t
1V,,,,til'5h'{f l f)t 11th .l •o,l•l l'R114 Cl"AI '-lf:SIIC,1,t..U
,,., Of f•'IOI I W')OC cou,a, er ,\~D" t. 614'1· \I,. I, n ,11ti.1,o
•:<ll ~OJ!ll t.~•.J,t:l,1!tl I I
L t'
• , -L_ .• _._,~•-~r
r--:::---.. ---/ '
--·, -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I CJ
I
I
I
l a
__ _j
I __ , "' I i -I I ~
I : ' " • I 'P ... _.l,', . :l.::.._'T _c,:]: _ ,;J'.',. _ t1 l
,. ---
".
I • .:··._--i'lJ:-"'l· ,, . . , I
..: 0 < > <(
z
' 1-,.,.,
I -:·
'/ ~·-~ :f:' 1
1.-
.. .,,, I ••
,r :.-· fj i I ·· r·, ·-c:---:;-1,;--= :0 ·1 · [i _., " " ! I I 1
.:.. J
-·t.-7,.::·-
•("'' l
JL [
·--,-~1 ,1 .
I I\°'' ••• •• ; I .;.· ..,----
] '1. i[ -,,
L} I
·1
I t ! •·
___u !
c ;;
w =~~ ::Ii ·;
~ ;.: ..
n.. "; ..
Q
<(
> <( z
X ...
::,
0
VJ
,:,
N ..
~· •• _ .... ,. ••• :· •,1
'
-,
I
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Date Agenda Item Subject
September 3, 2013 11 a ii 2013 EnNewood Water
Conservation Plan
INITIATED BY
Utilities Department
I STAFF SOURCE
Stewart H . Fonda , Director of Utilities
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Council approved a prior Water Conservation Plan on March 11 , 1997.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Englewood Water and Sewer Board recommended Council approval of the 2013 Water Conservation
Plan at their July 9. 2013 meeting.
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, "-''0 ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
The City o; r:nglewood Utilities Department. recogni zing state and federal mandates to reduce water
demands in their service area, evaluated the impacts of wat~r conser\•ation on water supply and resource
planning. The proposed Water Conservation Plan outlines Englewood's existing water system, history, the
community it serves, tr.e publ ic information program, the metering program, leak repair and maintenance
• and additional proposed water conservat ion measures.
After reviewing the plan, the Water and Sewer Board then invited Englewood citizens lo review the plan
and make comments, with a deadline of luly 1, 2013. Art icles regarding the C.onservatinn Plan an<l rf!(111e st
for comments appeared in the Denver Post "Your Hub " on May 29, 2013, the Englewood Herald in April,
2013 and the Englewood Citizen in the May-June , 2013 issue . Th e information was also posted on the City
o i Englewooc website and the Utilities webp age from May I to July 1, 2013
Comments received were rei:arding xeriscaping and maintaining an urban forest , encouraging appropriate
and effic ient use of water resources , using increased r,1tes for heavier users, usw1g rain barrels a~d
gra\•w,Her, us •ng water efficiPnt tnilPls in city h11ilrli:t8S ;1nd implementing a strong incentive program for flat
rate accounts to conv<?rt to met,.!r . All public comments received were addressed and ,1 summ;uy is
included in the Plan Appendi,
After Council approval , the plan will be submrlted 10 the Office of Water Conservation , the Water
Conservation Board and the Department of Natural Resources.
FINANCIAi. IMPACT
The Utilities Department rece ived a Water Conservation Planning Grant in the amount of $46,000, with the
City matching $20,000 with in-kind services for Implementation of a ten -year plan from 20 13 to 202 2.
Approval ol the proposed plan would enable Englewood to apply for future slate loans, gr ants and
water/w:stewater revolving funds .
• LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Proposed Bill for OnJi11ance
•
•
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 2013
BY AlITHORITY
COUNCIL BILL NO . 47
INTRODUCED BY COUNCrL
MEMBER _____ _
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE •·ENGLEWOOD tr! D.ITIES DEPARTMENT 2013
WATER CONS ERVATION Pl.Al\."
WHEREAS, Stnte nu d fedeml mnndotes require the Cit y to revi•w woy, to reduce water
demands in its scrYicc area; and
WHEREAS , the Col orado Water Conservation Board requires a wat er consen,ntion pion,
approved by the State as a condition of eligibilit y for a water effici ency grant to implement the
City's Plan ; and
WHEREAS , th e City ha s evaluated the impacts ofwa•er conservation on the water supply;
ru td
WHEREAS, every se ven yea rs Coloi ado requires on updating of the City's W•lcr
Conservation Plan and Englewood City Council approved a rrior Water Conservation Plan on
March II , 1997 ; and
WHf:REA.:i , the propo:;ed Water Conservation Plan outlines Englewood 's existing water
sysiem, it• hist ory , the cnm mnnit y ,t serves , the public informat ion program, the meterinK
program, leak rq,air as well as maintenance and additional proposed water conservation
measures; and
WHEREAS , after the planning process. which included public comment, the Englcw0<xl
Wa:er and Sewer Board recommended Council approval at their July 9,20 1 J meeting ; and
WHEREAS , the plan, once appro ved by the City Council, will be submined lo th• Offic,: of
Wa te r Co nservation , The Wat er Con servati on Board and !ht Depanment of Natural Resoun,es
for their approval; and
WHEREAS , Stale appro val of the proposed plan will enable Englewood to apply for future
state loans , grants and wa1erlwas1ewo1er revolving funds .
NOW , THEREFORE , BE IT ORDAINED BY me CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO , TPAT :
~. The City Council of the City of Enilewood hereby approves the "City of Englewood
Utilities Department 2013 Water Com .:rvotion Pltt11", anached hereto as E>thil,it A .
Introduced, rud in full, 3nd passed on first reading on the 3rd day of September, 2013 .
Published by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance in the <.:tty"s ollictal newspaper on the 6th day of
September, 2013 .
Published as a Bill for on Ordinance on the City's official website beginning on the 4th day of
Soptcmber, 2013 for thirty (30) days.
Rondy P. PeM, Mayor
ATTEST :
Loucrishio A. Ellis, City Clerk
I. Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Co lorado , h,,reby certify thnt the
above and foregoing is 3 true copy of• Bill for an Ordinance, mtroduced, r,:ad in full , and pa«ed on
fir st reading on the 3rd day of September, 2013 .
l.oucrishia /\. Ellis
'I
,,
•
•
•
CITY OF ENGLE\VOOD
Utilities Department
2013
WATER CONS ERV A TIO!\ PLAN
"?'ABLE OF CONTENTS
!xecutlva Summary ..................................................................................... .
Chapter 1 -Introduction ............................................................................... .
Chapter 2 -Profile Existing W1t1r System ....................................................... .
Charactertstlcs of Englewood·s Weter Supply System ..................................... .
System Limitations .................................................................................. ..
Water Costs and Pricing .......................................................................... ..
Policies and Planning Initiatives Affecting Water Use ..................................... ..
Current Wat11r Cunserwtlon Activities .................................................................. ..
Chapter 3 -Water Un and Demand Forecast ................................................. .
Use by Customer Category ....................................................................... .
Taps and Water Use Summary ................................................................. .
Demand Forecast... ................................................................................ ..
O~apter 4 -Water ConHrvatlon Goals ........................................................... .
Goel Development Process ...................... .. .. .. .... .. .. .. ................................. .
Weter Conser,ation Goals ........................................................... .
Chapter 6 -Conaarvatlon Measures an,1 Program, ........................................... .
Weter Conservation Measures and Programs ...................................... ..
Screening Criteria ........................................................ ..
Screening of Conservation Measurn and Programs ..... .
Chapter 8 -EyatuaUon and Selactlon ............................................................... .
Costs and Water Savings of Conservation Options ......................................... .
Comparison of Benefits and Costs ................................................................. ..
Evatuatton Criteria .......................................................................................... ..
Selected Conservation Measures and Programs ............................................. ..
Chapter 7 -Integrate Resourc111 and Modify Forei:aats .................................... .
Implementation Schedule ................................................................................. .
Modified Demand Forecast .............................................................................. ..
Benen111 uf Water ConservaUon ....................................................... , .................. .
Chapter 8 -Plan of lmplementatton and Monitoring ......................................... .
Public Participation ............................................................................................. .
Monitoring and Evaluation .................................................................................. .
Plan Updates and Revisions ............................................................................ ..
Plan Adoption and Approval ............................................................................... .
ReferencH ........................................................................................................... ..
ES-1
1
2
2
10
11
14
14
18
18
18
21
22
22
22
25
25
25
25
29
29
32
32
33
37
37
39
39
40
40
40
40
41
43
~ Clear Water Solutlono , Inc.
City of Engl-ood
2013 Waler CanHrvatlon Plan
•
•
•
•
•
LIST OF TABLES
Table ES-1 •
TableES-2 •
Table 2.1 •
Table2 .2-
Table 2.3 -
Table 2.4 •
Table2 .5-
Table 2.6 -
Table 2.7 •
Table2.8-
Table 3.1 .
Table 3.2 •
Table 3.3 -
Table 3.4 •
Table3.5-
Table3.6-
Table4.1-
Table 5.1 •
Table6.1 •
Table 6.2 -
Table6.3 •
Table6.4 -
Table 7.1 •
Table 8.1 -
Water Conaeivation Goals ............................................................ ..
lnplamentaUon Plan for Englewood's Water Conseivallon Plan .... .
City of Englewood Hlstortcal Population ....................................... ..
Annual Water Delivered & Associated Rainfall ............................... ..
Firm Source Water Owned by the City of Englewood ................. ..
City of Englewood 2012 Metered Rates Inside City ............. , ...... ..
City of Englewood 2012 Metered Rates Outside City ................. ..
Single -Use Water System Connection Charges ......................... ..
Multi-Family Residential Water System Connection Charges ........ .
Commercial Mixed Use Water Connection Charges .................... .
City of Enolewood Water UsA ...
City of Englewood Metered Taps by Customer Catogory ................ ..
City of Englewood Non-Metered Taps by Customer Category ........ .
City or Englewood Total Taps by Customer Category .................. ,
City or Englewood Water Use per Tap (metered customers) ......... ..
City of Englewood Par Capita Water Use ................................. ..
Englewood Water Conservation Goals ..................................... ..
Universal List of Conservation Measures and Programs .................. .
CosVSavlngs Analysis of Conservation Measures and Programs .. .
Cost-Benefll Ranking ...................................................................... .
Combined Water Savings of Selected Conservation Measures and
Programs ........................................................................................... .
Water Consen,atlon Goals and Comparison ............................. ..
City cf Englewood Water Conservation Plan Implementation
Schtdule ..................................................................................... .
Tra•Jdng Matrix for Monitoring Water Conservation Measure& ........ ..
ES-3
ES-4
2
8
9
12
12
13
13
13
18
19
19
19
20
20
23
26
31
32
33
35
38
42
0 Clel f W1t1r Sofutlons, Inc.
City of ~"Atewood
2013 Watar i;.,naervatlon Plan
II
LIST OF FIGt;RES
Figure 2.1 -Englewood Water Service Area ...................................................... 3
Figure 2.2 -Englewood Water Distribution System ........................ ,................. 4
Figure 2.3 -Percentage of Tapa per Customer Category ........................................ 7
Figure 2.4 -Percentage of Water Use per Category ....................................... 7
Figure 2.S -Annuel Weter Delivered .................................................................... 8
Figure 2.6 -EMAP Details .................................. ............................. ...... ...... ........ 16
C> Clear Water Solution,, Inc.
City of Englewood
2013 Water Con ■ervaUon Plan
Ill
•
•
•
•
•
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Clly r,f Englewood, Colorado ("City" or "Englewood") Is a suburban
metropolitan community located sout~, of Denver In Arapahoe County. During
the past five years, the City of Engt,,wood's population has hovered around
30,000.
Englewood has developed a Water Conservation Plan in accordance with the
Water Conservation Act of 2004 and to meet the provisions of Colorado Revised
Statute section 37-60-126 . As part of CRS 37-60-126, a State-approved Plan will
qualify Englewood for funding from the Colorado Water Conservation Board
(CWCB) and the Colorado Water Resc,urces and Power Development Authority
for water supply and del ivery projects.
In 2011 , Englewood's water customer; used approximately 5,606 acre-feel. The
City, according to the Planning Department's projection, is not expected to
Increase Its water demand through new growth . Waler savings from this water
conservation planning effort Is estimated to save the 6,721 acre-feet over the
planning period of 2013 to 2022 .
For some of the selected water conservation me .sures and programs, estimated
savings over the planning period is calculated by compounding the estimated
annual waler savings per th1:1 tottll number of annual participants . The savings
from this planning effort will make a considerable contribution toward the water
supplies needed to serve the 2022 demand.
This report documents Englewood's water system, past and future water use and
the water conservation planning process used in accordance with CWCB's Water
Conservation Plan guidelines and policies .
Water Conservation Goals
Englewood has considered water conservation in its planning for many years and
has developed a number of measures to pr,:,mote efficient water use . The City
has instituted the following water conservation measures and programs :
• Public Information
• Meter Replacement
o Englewood Meter Assistance Program (EMAP) -This program
helps water customers install meters in homes by allocating a
oortion of their water bill payment towards the cost of a meter.
• Leak Detection
• Plumbing C<Y.ie
• Nonpotabl11 and Water Reuse
Cl CIHr Water Solullon1, Inc.
City of Englewood
2013 W■l■r Con .. rvallon Plan
ES-1
The City is uncertain of the reduction in water use attr ibutable to the existing water
conservation efforts . However, over the ten-year plann ing period (2013 to 2022),
tracking efforts will be Implemented to quantify water savings and costs to operate this
Water Conservation Plan .
Water savings goals were established for th is Water Cunservation Plan by complet ing
the following steps :
• Establishing an initial water savings goal estimate
• Selecting water conser\'ation measures or programs to meet those goa ls
• Comparing the expected water savings to the original goals
in order to select water conservation measures and programs to meet tile water savings
goals, a universal lls l of measures and programs were subject to an initial sc.reenlng ,
cost-benefit analys is and final screen ing. This process pared tho universal list down to
the final select ion of measures/programs that Eng lewood will 1mplomcnt. Tile 9cree11ing
criteria used consisted of the following :
1. StaffTlme
2. Financial implications
3 . Political ramifications
The goal for this Water Conservation Plan Is to reduce the overall water use by ten
percent or 6 ,721 AF over a ten -year planning period. Thif. ,avings will come from water
use categories that were Identified through the planning process for potential water
savings :
• Single-Family
• Multi-Family
• Commercial
• lndustrtal
• Munic ipal
• Non-Metered Customers -Meter Replacement and EMAP
• Unaccounted-For Losses
The City's water conservation goals are shown In Table ES-1 .
Cl CIHr Water Solullona, Inc.
City of Englewood
2013 Water ConHrvallon Plan
ES,2
•
•
•
Table ES· 1 -Water Con ■ervatlon Goals
Tot ■I Projeded
Wm,rUse Adjusted RedUdlon G°"ls for
Water Use C1ote1or1e ■: IZOUto ZO-UI Ptannln Horizon
(AFi ,,., (AF)
Slnalc -Fnmllv 19 642 6.5% 1277
Mulll-Famllv 11602 11.0!6 1276
Commercial 10,387 5.59' 571
Industrial 4,778 7.0% 334
Munlcloal 225 0.5% 1
Non -Metered Customer;•
Matar Replacemant and
EMAr 18,207 14.4'6 2,G13
Unaccounted -for Losses
(currently 9") S,&36 8.0% 648
Total Waler Production : 70,677
Total Demand Reduction: 6,721
Tot•I Percent Reduction : 10%
lmplementatlon Plan
All or the propo~ed waler conservation measures and programs chosen will req1 •ire stall
and financial resources for Implementation . This Will require some strategy In
Implementing the most beneficial measures first. For lllustraUve purposes, a three-year
schedule has been proposed and should be interp reted that Year 1 Is the City's first
priority of projects followed by Year 2 and then Year 3 and wilt not be within three years
exactly. The proposed implementation of this Water Conservation Plan will occur as the
necessary resources become avall11ble.
Englewood Is committed to implementing lhe selected water conservation programs and
will budget money and pursue CWCB water-efficiency grant money to accomplish this
goal. Table ES-2 shows the implementation schedu le· :'If the selected
measures/programs .
Monitoring of the Plan will be completed on an annual basis and a fomnal update is
requ ired by CWCB within seven years . Public feedback is an integral part of th is Plan
and comments were solicited and incorporated into the final Plan .
C, Clear Waler Solull"'11, Inc ,
City of Englewood
2013 Water Conoenratlon Pl1n
ES -3
Table El•2 -lmplementatla,, !'l1n for Inglewood'• WIier Con1erv1tlon Plan
Measu,e/Pn,1,.m
YEAR 1115T PRIORITYI
tl'rllryMllllnttnfnct,,_,llflll ErlllWDOd Mt1er ~1tst1nc1Pr-m lfMAP
titntr,111 EvllUlftCftOI .. OII CI H that lncourapwater
lltfu'-t.,.. St•tirl•rd• Pr09rt1m Sa•1111111
'N•litf Wui.Ordlrlf'ICI
lducotlonol Pro,rom1 Sckc ol EdiJCatlcnP,ocr•m IIC•\2 E1tuc1Uon)
Unllnl ACC"I tO Wlllf tt!U ,na l'tt HOf'I
YEAR Z IZND PRIORITY!
-•f•ton, Slondo" rroar11rt1 P•ouahl Mlda,tlon Pla,i
PubllC Uuutton • Ntwllm.r, 8111 m,1 ,,s. WdHltll!
Edut11 Uott0/ Prop,oms Di1t11~u1.tET lrrl ~tion SchldU li "l ln Wlltr llill
lldott ond lnccntM P,oftomJ ResldenU•I Wllet luCl b
YEAR 313RD PRIORITYI
\lfflltvMoffttlMtlG ,,,.,."" LHk Dttec ll on . hN>il lf
f'.!J U.:Hlon,tklts
tduumonol fro,rom,
,.,... • .,.., -~·-,,o,,.,,,. Conmertlll I lnouurt1I walt'f ~«lb
"'9ulat"'}' Stcnthnl l'roftelfU Wiler Rain thal Cn,oura1~W1te S,,l11 p
C> Clear Water so,1Jtlon1, Inc.
City of l!nglawood
lmpl1m1ntatlon Considerations
SUI, .ur.elFundln•
St.aflfirM
su~ff nl'I¥. & GOVff 1u11~111al At,ion
St1ff 'T1mel Fundln1
SQffTime
Fund lt1 1& )tiff 1tmt
Steff Tlln!, Fun.J ,ltl I Procu1elftlnt of
MITtrUls
Staff Time. Fun:un, I Procu,efflffl t of
M~t ttllls
St11ff Timi', f undl nt A Procu r~t nf
MlltrlllS
func1n1&sialf nmt
S11 ff l1r,,e, Fund lns & l'roc urernen1 of
M11e rl1lf
Staffnm1
h 111dl n1&Sto lfnmc
2013 Weter Con ■-rvatlon Plan
ES ◄
•
•
•
CHAPTER 1 ~ INTRODUCTION
The City of Englewood, Colorado ("City· or 'Englewood") Is a suburban
metropolitan community located south of Denver in Arapahoe Count~.
Englewood's beginnings are traced to gold . In the mld-1800s , prospectors on
their way to California stopped in Colorado to pan Its streams . One of these
prospectors was a man from Georgie named William Green Russell . He and 12
other miners found gokl In the SoU1h Platte River and established a Placer Camp
near the confluence of Little Ory Creek and the South Platte River in an area that
would evenlually become Englewood . Today's Englewood Is a distl~ct reflection
of its colorful history. There is still a focus on transportation, education, and the
arts, and Englewood boasts more jobs and businesses per square mile than any
other city in the Rocky Mountain region . Englewood is located west of the Denver
Tech Center, north of Littleton and south or Denver, which gives it its strong
employment base .
While Englewood, according to the Planning Department's projection, Is not
expected to increase Its water demand through new growth, a number of multi•
family housing projects are being planned . The City of Englewood was
incorporated in 1 • ,03 with a land area of 4,410 acres . Fifty-eight percent of the
land is residential , 35 percent industriaVcommercial and seven percent public .
The City Is landlocked with no appreciable amount of land that can be annexed .
During the past five years, the City of Englewood's population has hovered
around 30,000.
Englewood has developed this Water Conservation Plan in accordance with the
Water Conservation Act or 2004 and to meet the provisions or Colorado Revised
Statute section 37 1\0-126. A:. part of CRS 37-60-126, a State-approved Plan will
qualify Englewood ,()r funding from tt.e Colorado Water Conservation Board
(CWCB) and the Colorado Water Resources and Power Development Authority
for water supply and delivery projects .
Englewood is committed to optimizing its water supplies and system through
practical water conservation practices . Engl111N0od has also been able to provide
water to neighboring communities in need . With added efficie:1cy, the City may
have more water to allocate for lease (sale or 1:aw water) cutside the City. The
planning horizon for th is plan is ten years, frorn 201~ to 2022 .
~ Clear W11tr SoluUons, Inc .
City af Englewood
2013 Waler Con11rnllon Plan
CHAflTl:::R 2 -PROFILE EXISTING WATER SYSTEM
Characteristics of Englewood's Water Supply System
Population and Service Area
The 201 O Census data for Englewood shows a population of 30,255 people . The
following table shows Englewood's population for the last six years .
Tabla ll, 1 -Chy of Englewood Hlalorlcal Popul1Uon
Year Pooulatlon
2007 32,191
2008 )2,191
1009 ll,191
1010 l0,155
1011 l0,155
1012 l0,155
Averqe 11.223
source : (nt1ewooe1 ', co:np,ehenslve 1,1li1 nn,111J1fuu~u
olnd dac11m1n1, '1ooflmo,rn9/f'Wood:hl9l,wood
Comr,,rltcuulw Pion.
Prior to 1952 , the City of Englewood was provided water service by the Denver
Water Board . In response to new w.iter meter requirements and proposed
higher rates for water servica, the citizens of Englewood voted in September
1948 lo Issue bonds to develop an Independent water system to serve the Ci~;.
Attorney Marcus Shivers and Charles Allen, the mayor during this period, W< re
the guiding forces in the development of Englewood 's water system . Their task
was not only to build a water treatment and pump facility to distrlbule the lraated
water but also to acquire an adequate raw water supply .
Having securod water rights, the nece&sary facilities to deliver raw water for
treatmenl and distribution to the City were built. An intake facility to pump raw
water was oonstructed at Union Avenue along the side of the South Platte River.
The Intake facility oonslsled of a diversion dam, Intake gate , a small reservoir and
a pump station. A pipeline was then constructed from the facility to the new
treatment plant located at S. Windermere Street pnd W. Layton Avenue . The
treatment plant had a capacity of 25 million gallons per day (MGD) and began
operation in April 1952. Two 3-MG reservoirs were also constructed during the
fifties to supplement the distribution system supply
C, Clear Wall• Solutlone, Inc:.
Clly of Engl1wood
2013 Water Consor,atlon Plan
•
•
•
•
Over the following years . many improvements were made to the system to meet water
use demands, pressure problems , and to enhance treatment. The following figures
show Englewood 's service area and distribution system .
Figure 2.1 -Englewood Water Service Area
I
' ''
I
!
j
' ..
i -1 \ .. !' \ ,~1
'
I
Eng le Vv ood Water Service Area t
N
k~ Clear Water s,,lution s , Inc .
City of Engl~wouJ
2013 Water Conservation Plan
Figure 2.2 -Englewood Water Distribution System
-ng lewoo · \N at er Ov r 8 ln<.:h s 111 D1am e t .r
I --.. ·-I
Cle ~, Wi,te• Solut1 'Ill l iH,
C U'( o f F-n rJ ll}W OO d
····'-
c'O t3 W 11 h 11 Con surv.tt 1on Pl ,:rn
•
•
•
•
•
•
To meet future demand, the rew water supply system was supplemented with several
major supply and storage projects to increase the yield of Englewood's water resources.
The City constructed McLellan Reservoir on Dad Clark Gulch located near County Line
Road and S. Santa Fe . The 6,000 acre-foot reservoir was constructed to provide
storage to augment the row water supply in dry years. Other projects included the
piping of the City Ditch and McBroom Ditch, the rehabilitation of the Boreas Pass Ditch,
and upgrades lo the Union Avenue pumping facililles and associated piping . Also, the
City constructed three deep wells to augment the raw water supply.
The City was plagued with water pressure problems during the slX1les and seventies as
Englewood's populallon grew. There was Insufficient water pressure at several points In
the system and the quantities of available water were less than adequate. Several
studies were performed during this period with the Intent of solving the pressure and
supply problem . Several improvements were constructed Including the 500,000 gallon
Zuni tank, a 6-MG reservoir, and several pump stations in the distribution system. In
1977, the City, still plagued with water pressure problems, adopted a multi-pressure
zone system. The water dlstrlbut1011 system was segmented into three separate and
independent pressure zones . Several large transmission mains were installed to deliver
a water supply to the separate zones. Along with the large transmission mains, a
200,000 gallon elevated tank was constructed on Sherman Streel south of Belleview .
This zoned system proved to finally resolve the pressure supply problem.
The quality of the South Platte Rov'!r at the Union Avenue Diversion pump station was
eKcellent when the City system was initiated in 1952. The original plant was a softening
plant. That was abandoned when the City went to coagulation/filtration. Over the last
few decades, ·1everal conditions on the South Platte River upstream of Union Avenue
led to the degr<!dation of the water. The treatment plant was therefore partially
upgraded in 1977, and then more completely so in 1980. The upgrade increased the
treatment capacity to 34 MGD; added new chemical coagulation and a multimedia
nitration system . By the mid-nineties, the Increased nutrients and algae in the South
Plalle River once again triggered Improvements . To meet the challenges, the treatment
plant was converted from a direct filtration process to a conventional treatment process .
Using plate settlers, new flocculation and sedimentation facilities were Incorporated into
the existing plant site . In addition , the existing filters were retrofitted with granular
activated carbon to improve taste and odor . The new plant addition was onllne In 2000
with a treatment capacity of 28 MGD . The treatment capacity was lowered due to
reduced water demand . The reduced water demand was due to required metering of
residential property at the Ume the property changed hands .
Water Demanct
Based on the City's billing system, average water use IN the last five years is :
• Total: 171 Gallons Per Capita Per Day (GPCD) system-wide
• Residential: 89 GPCD for single-and multi -family homes
® Cl ■ar Water Solutions, Inc .
City of Englewood
2013 Water ConHrv .. lon Pl1n
5
In 1987, the Englewood City Council passed an ordinance requiring the ln1tallaUon of
water meters (and switching to consumption-based rate) at properties receiving flat
rates, upon transfer of ownership. An average of 220 meters have been inslolled
annually for the past 25 years, and an associated 30 percent reduction in water use has
taken place . By tho end or 2011, Englewood was serving 10,670 taps including 8,596
variable rate customers (metered taps) and 2,074 fixed rate customers (non-metered
taps). The tap categories Include the following :
• Single-Family
• Multi-Family
o Includes Mobile Home Parks
• Commercial
o Includes Schools
• Industrial
• Municipal
• Non-Metered Taps
Eaeh of the customer categories are shown In Figure 2.3 below with the coinciding
percentage of total taps (metered and non-metered).
The water use dtstrlbutlon for the same customer categories looks a little dirterent than
the tap distribution and is shown below In Figure Z.4 . While Single-Fam ily water users
•
consist ol 80 percent of the taps , they only contribute 43 percent of the water use . •
Conversely, while Industrial and Commercial taps only consist of ten percent ot the
taps, they contribute 31 percent of the water use . This is helpful to consider when
selecting conservation measures to target certain categories.
IP Clear Water Solutlona, Inc:.
City of Englewood
2013 Water Conauvlllion Plan
6 •
•
•
•
Figure 2,3 -Percentage of Tap• per Cu■tomer Catogory
2011 Total Taps
Mun lclpal
o.o, ..
Flgu,e 2.4-Plfctnlage of Wator UH por Catogo,y
Cl Clur Water SotuUona, Inc •
City of Englawood
2011 Water Use
(metered customers)
2013 Water Con1ervatlon Plan
The following table shows Cngfewood 's overall production for each of the past ten years.
Table 2.2. Annual Water Delivered (Overall Production) & A11ocl1ted Preclp .
'!EAR Annuel Water .......,., Waler Dollwuy Pteclpltatlon
o. .... ry (lnchoa)
(MG) (Al')
2002 2.~20 .85 B,1183 s.Ge
2003 2,047 .29 B,124 13.92
200. 2,273.17 e,srs 18.47
2005 2.~~9 ./0 1.8:>~ 13.~4
1~09 2,589 ,Tfi 7,948 11.19
2007 2,070.91 6,355 16.33
2001 2.224 .46 8 ,827 11.16
2009 1,951 .71 5 ,083 24 .7
2010 2,0 40.19 a.2a3 9.9
2011 1,96 3.22 5 ,71 8 13.4
Noru: MG • MIi/Jo n Golla~,,,.,• krt·(ttt, r rec/pltorl on occoun u,'o r ra i 11jo/l an 1 J/lo wfa /1
Tabla 2.2 and Figure 2.5 shows steady decline in overall water consumption .
figure 2.8 • Annual Water Delivered (Overall Producflon)
Annual Water Delivery (Millions of Gallons)
'l.500.0W ~---------
'1,IIIIOIII ..,_ ________ _
j 1.am.om +----------1
i
ZC:Jllc:BlO#l l~lllllllc:17ll:lllC3111~Nll
•lt-~\'lr.PI' Drh!rt (t'.!~1
f 6i:ortl
~ Clear Water Solutions, Inc.
City of Englewood
2013 Water Conoervatlon Plan
8
•
•
•
•
•
Sources a, watgr supqlv
The water supplies owned by the City are shown in Table 2.3 along with their firm yield .
Tablo 2,3 -Firm Source Wator Ownod by th• City of &nghlwood
WIier Source
Nevada Ditch #4
Nevada Ditch #19
Plalle Canyon Ditch #14
Petersburg Ditch #6
Nevad a Ditch #4
Nevada Ditch #19
McBroom Ditch #I
Ranch Creek
Borea, Ditch
Brown Ditch 119
Gulraud Ditch #6
City Ditch #I
Decreed Amounts • acre-
feel/yr
Consumptive
Use
409
!OS
22 7
17S
41
Single-Use
'142
92
85
1,363
Aurora Delivery Obllsation ___ _;3::3:::.9 __ --'=1
North Res .
WWRes
Mclellan
Totill 1,296
Water Stored'
Total
•Amounts ,now for uo,ed water,,. not llrm '1tlds
During the late forties to mid-forties , Englewood acquired senior water rights from five
ditches , which were then transferred in water court to Englewood's South Platte River
inlake located at Union Avenue . In addllion, Englewood acquired rights on two ditches
localed on Bear Creek and rights on lhe City Ditch. The City Ditch rights are the
number one priority in the South Platte River Bas in. The rights to two transmountain
diversion projects were also acquired by the City In the fifties . The first was Boreas
Dilch located on the continental divide between Como ~nd Breckenridge, which diverts
water from the Blue River drainage basin to the South Park area in the South Platte
River Basin . The second transmountain diversion rights which the City acquired were
the Ranch Creek/Meadow Creek rights, which were the right to collect , store, and divert
Fraser River Basin waler th rough Denver's Moffat Tunnel system .
q-; Cl11r Water Sclullons , In~.
City of Englawood
2013 Water ConHrvatlon Plan
9
System Limitations
Along with areas of high water use, system limitations can provide insight into how and
where to set water conservation goals. Discu681ons hers will include both current and
potential systam limitations . Ideally, conservation can help mitigate a portion of the
limitations and improve the reliability and efficiency of the system .
SIBIBwid& Waler Supply lnll{al/ys
In 2003, the Colorado General Assembly authorized CWCB to implement the Statewide
Water Supply Initiative (SWSI) as a result of growing pressure on water supplies in
Colorado and the 2002 drought. The study identified current and future water demands,
evalleble water supplies , and existing and planned water supply projects In eight major
river basins In the State. SWSI was recenlly updated to SWSI 2010, which projocts
demands to 2050 and includes pausive water ccnservation savings . Passive savings
Includes such things as futUl'fil devti,opment using more efficient water fixtures in their
building process .
The City of Englewood is located in the Metro Basin where SWSI 2010 identified a 57
percent gap between water needs and water supplies in the Basin by 2050 . Water
conservation is one method the SWSI report identified for meeting this gap.
Qrv-Year water Supply
Englewood owns several very senior water rights that divert from the South Plalle River
at Union Avenue. While these water rights provide the City with an ample supply of
water, in dry years, such as 2002 and 2012, the low streamnow In the river, together
with the demands for water from other senior rights, may result In the City's senior river
rights not being able to provide the City with an of the waler needed .
Unaccounted4or Water Use
There are two types of water losses lhat occur in water ulililies, apparent losses and
real losses . Apparent losses are paper losses that can bo caused by customer maier
inaccuracies , billing system data errors or unauthorized consumptions . Real losses are
those that are physically lost within the distribution system, including the water
treatment process.
Englewood slefl estimates that system loasos have averaged nine percent ror the last
few years . Even though unaccounted-for water Ion ratios of less than ton percent ere
considered good by Industry standards , the City desires lo reduce those losses to elghl
percent.
The City does not have any notable llmltatlo., beyond the llmltatlons listed above .
Because lhe City was proactive in their inlrastructure planning and construcUon,
0 Clur Water Solullona, Inc ,
City ol Englewood
2013 Weier Con1erv1llon Plan
10
•
•
•
•
•
Englewood 's water treatment and storage facilities are more than adequate to
accommodate their water suppl iea .
Water Coats and Pricing
Wat,rfuod
The Enp•ewood Utilities Water Fund accounts for revenues and expenses associated
with providing water services to City of Englewood residents . The Water Fund is one of
the Cily's Enterprise Funds . wh ich account for operaUons that: (a) are financed and
operated In a manner similar to private business enterprises where the intent of the
governing body Is that the costs of providing goods or services to the general public on
a continuing bas is be flnanced or recovered primarily through u~er charges , or (~ J
where the City Council has decided that periodic determination of revenue earned ,
expenses Incurred and/or net Income Is appropriate for capital ma lnlenance , public
policy , management controls, accountability or other purposes . The Water and Sewer
Board provides gu idance and oversees the Water and Sewer Enterprise Funds and
related acllvltles.
Charges for Water SelY{cu
The City of Englewood sets its weter and sewer rates llased upon cosl-of-service
principles . Englewood charges only enough to cover lhe cost of its operations and to
maintain a reasonab le conUngency for emergencies .
All Englewood water and sewer customers are grouped Into one of two customer
classes (residential or commercial) and by whether they live Inside or outs ide of
Englewood . Cost-of-service rates recover costs from each customer class In proportion
to the cost of providing the service to each class .
The rates for Iha Englewood water and sewer service area are approved by the
Englewood Water and Sewer Board and the Englewood City Council eftor e review of
the revenue requirements and costs underlying any rate proposal. There is a public
comment period (thirty days) prior to the Counci l's voting on the proposed rates . New
rates become effective thirty days after Council approval.
There are two components to Englewood 's metered water rates : a per 1,000 gallons
consumption charge, and an administrative charge to cover such th ings as lhe cost of
meter readinc and bill ing . For residences or businesses with water meters larger than
3/4" there is a -.,inimum charge based on the size of the waler meter . All customers are
bWled on a quarterly bas is.
Cl Cl11r Water Solutlona, Inc .
City ol l!nglewood
20 13 Wat■r ConHrvatlon Plan
11
Table 2.4 -Cily of Englewood 2012 Metered Rate• lnlidl CHy
uarte~ Con1um lion
$3.29
$2.04
ln1idt Citv Minimum Om•
Consumption
Total lnduded In
Quarterty Minimum M,lnlmum
MeterSl11 a..,.. AdmlnFff Ch-(Gallons)
5/8" $8.51 $8.51 N/A None
3/4" $9.71 $9.71 N/A None
1" $83 .10 $10.74 $72.36 22000
1 -1/4" $104.25 $12.16 $92.09 28,000
1 -1/2" $158.82 $10.81 $148.01 45,000
T $249 .66 .12.as $236.81 72,000
3" $461 .66 $17.64 $444.02 135,000
4'' $764 .Sl $24.48 $]4().03 225,000
6" $1457.91 $40.41 $1,417.50 450,000
Note. The mlrimlffl charge plus Iha adminb~ '" 9®•~ UII TOIII OUlnertv Charge
Table 2.5 -City of Englewood 2012 Metered RIIH Outalde City
uartart Con,um tlon
S4.6
Clllblde CIIY Minimum a. ....
eon,umptlon
Total lnduded In
Quartarly Minimum Minimum
MeterSla 0.arp Admln Fee Cllarp (Gallons)
5/r ~-58 $8.58 N/A None
314'' $9 .22 $9.22 N/A None
l" $112.80 $11.36 $101.44 22,000
1 • 1/4" $142.26 $13.15 $129.11 28000
I· 1/1' $218.12 $10.62 $207.50 45,000
2" $344 .S9 $12 .60 $331.99 72.000
3" $639.62 $17.14 5622.49 135,000
4" $1057.04 $19 .57 $1,037 .48 225,000
6" $2,049.42 $-10.52 $2,001.90 450,000
Noto: lhe minimum tharg• plus it.. admlniltralMt fn equalt 1111!1 Tot,1 Ouane,ty CMrt,9
C> Claar Water Solutlona, Inc.
Clly of Englewood
2013 Water Cons•rvation Plan
12
•
•
•
•
Englewood's waler connection fees are based on the size of the lap, or a combination of
multi-family residential units and commercial fixture units. The following tables detail
the waler system connection charges .
Tobit 2.& -Singl•Uae Water Syatom Connection Chara•
Inside City Outside City
MetorSl1■ Connection Feo Conntction Fee
5/8' or 3/4' $4 360.00 $6,540.00
1" $7,270.00 $10,905.00
1 -1/2" $14,500.00 $2l,750.00
2" $23 300.00 $34 !150.00
3" $,',6, 500. 00 $69,750.00
4" $72 700.00 $100,050.00
6" S174,400.00 $261,600.00
The multi-family residential water system connection charge is the total of the base loo
plus the per-dwelling unit fee . For multi •fllmily waler connections . f~s shall be the
greater of 1) the sum of the mulll-family connection fees or 2) the meter sized based
connection fee per the Single-Use W,;iter Connection Fee schedule above .
Table 2,7 -Muttl•Famlly Residential Water Syet•m Connection ChargH
Base Fee
First 12units $580.00
Nut 22 units $450.00
o,er 3 un its $275.00
The Water System Connection Charge for Mixed Use Res ldenUal and Commercial
properUes is the combination of the Mulfl-Fam ily Residential Connection Charge and the
Commercial Mixed Use Water Connection Charge .
Table 2,8 -Commerclal MIHd UN Watw Connection Charge■
First 125 Fixture Un its
Next 250 Fixture Unit!
Over 3/5 Fixture Unit!
~ Clear Water Solutlona, Inc .
City of Englewood
ln,ide Cilv
$83.00
$35.00
$25.00
Out,lde Cilv
$124.50
S52 .SO
s2,.oo
2013 Water ConH,-atlon Plan
13
Policies and Planning lnltlatlvea Affecting Water Use
Munlclpal Code
Englewood's municipal code includes an ordinance in v.hlch water shall be used only for
beneficial purposes and shall never be wasted . The ordinance specifically prohibits
water from being wasted by watering public walks, driveways or streets while irrigating
adjacent areas .
Current Water Conservation Activities
Tne City has instituted the following water conservation measures and programs :
• Public Information
• Meter Replacement
o Englewood Meter Assistance Program (EMAP)
• Leak Detection
• Plumbing Code
• Non-potable and Water Reuse
public lnfonm'iil2!1
•
CurrenUy, the City has an annual newsletter called "The Pipeline· that is sent to all its •
water users. This newsletter is used to inform the citizens of Englewood about various
utility Issues including w,ater conservation Ideas. Additionally, brochures and
Information regarding water conservation is readily available at City Hall .
Meter Replacement
T'le City of Englewood is committed in its effort to meter the entire City to provide an
accurate measurement and record of water use to aid in the promotion of water
conservation . Metering has been used to make customers more aware of how much
water they are using and to equilably distribute the costs of the operation and
maintenance of the water system. Presently the City has 80 percent of the ir customers
metered .
The metering program is enforced through the Ci!y Code which requires the installation
of meters in flat rate homtls when the property 0 1., 1ership changes . On a weekly basis
the City checks records of transactions in itie City and if these transactions indicate that
the ownersh ip or a flat-r..1 I~ ~ccount has changed the City immediately sends the owner
a notice to install a meter . :his requirement was adopted in the Code March 1987, and
has been successful in converting approximately 220 flat rate to metered water r01
year, wh:ch has resulted in a 50 percent reduction In peak water use .
!;I Clear Waler Solullon1, Inc.
City of !n9lewood
2013 Water Conaervatlon Plan
14 •
•
The City also has an on-going program of meter repair, replacement and recalibration .
The meter reading, repair/calibration and meter purchase are approximately two percent
of the budget.
Enat,wood Mftrr Assistanc, Program -Helo with switching from tlat rate to metered
UII!
If an Englewood water customer is Interested In switching from flat rate to a water
meter, the Utllltles Department has a program that helps manage lhe expense of
switching called the Englewood Meter Assistance Program (EMAP).
Under the flat rate plan (non-metered customers), small families typically pay for more
•vater than they actually use , especially during the winter months . The EMAP program
takes the difference between what customers pay for the net rate and what customers
would pay for the metered rate and uses that money to help pay the cost of installing
the water meter.
The cost of the meter, yoke and installation Is about $500 . The yoke Is designed to be
easy for a homeowner to Install , but the Utilities Department will include the cost of a
plumber to complete installation in the EMAP program . Details are included in Figure
2.6below.
Leak Repair & MRiQtenance
The City of Englewood is making a large effort to reduce the amount of leakage to zero .
The City has funded the upgrading and replacement of older deteriorated water mains .
Th is is possible throug, a capital improvement program , which during the next ten years
is expected to spend $500,000 on water system upgrades.
1. The City water department perfonns leak surveys which Include pressure drops,
surface water complaints and Investigation of dirty water complaints .
2. The City's maintenance crews respond as soon as possible to a report of actual
or detected leaks . They assess each situation individually by making the
appropriate shutoff to isolate the leak and reduce the volume of lost water .
The City has adopted a systematic repa ir and reptaceme'lt pro9ram to upgrade its water
system and avo id leaks .
~ CIHr Water Solutlona, Inc.
City of Englewood
2013 Water Con ■ervatlon Plan
15
Flguro 2.6 EMAP Ootails
. t. t ,,,
'"
Plumbmg Code
n ,c City oi Ee1 glewood 's Plu mbing Co de requ ire s water sov,ng devices for all new
c.o ns tr uction These wate•-conservrn g devices incl ude ma,i mum 1 6 ga ll or per flu sh
t•)1lets . 2 5 gallons-per-minute (gprn) fa ucets anc 2 5 gpm showerheads
! C l~M W ate r So lut lo n, Inc
CHv of f:nglowoo d
201 3 Water Co nserv at ion Pl.1 11
16
•
•
•
•
•
•
Water @use and Non-potable Systems
At the present lime, the only reusable or fully consumable water rights that Englewood
owns are the consumptive use entitlements decreed for the changes of Englewood's
interests In the Nevada Ditch, the McBroom Ditch and the Brown Ditch , as well as the
Aurora Delivery Obligation and Boroas No . 2 Ditch . However, because Englewood's
practice has been to lease these fully reusable enlillements to Centennial Water and
Sanitation District, there has been little opportunity for Englewood's actual reuse of
these sources . Currently, 100 percent of the backwash at the City water treatment plant
Is recycled back into the treatment process . The City uses the non-potable water
released from the plant for Irrigating the turf around the treatment plant.
The City does, however, provide water from the senior, 1860 City Dllch water right
which is used to irrigate the Cherry Hills Country Club in Cherry Hills Village and several
small customers along the ditch .
~ Cle■r Water Solullon1, Inc.
City of l!nglewood
2013 Water Conservation Plan
17
CHAPTER 3 • WATER USE AND .)EMANO FORECAST
Use by Customer Category
In 2011, Englewood's total water producUon for both metered and non-mete ;·ed
customers was estimated to be 5,606 acre-feet. Non-metered water use was
estimated based on the total water production , the known water use for metered
customers and the nine percent system loss estimate provided by Englewood
staff . Table 3.1 summarizes water use per customer category from 2005 through
2011 .
Tabla 3.1 -City of l!nglewood Water UH
MeU!tfd Non-Mclered
Single Muhl• To11I Esti'1llted Water Total
Commercial industrial Municipal Metered Use of Non -Metered Water
Veer Family Family Wotc r u~e Cunomers u,.
ocrc -fect ocre -fcct acrc ,fcct acre feet acre -feet acre -feet acre-feet ocrc feet
2005 1.832 994 1,307 420 62 4.615 2,949 7 564
2006 2162 1149 1,314 :;47 27 5,199 2,502 71110
2007 1,921 1178 966 :;45 21 4630 1570 6,200
2008 2,233 I 0'..S 1001 419 0 4161 1880 U'1
2009 1703 1419 884 434 14 4,454 1118 5572
2010 1.971 1176 867 473 20 4,507 1,598 6.105
2011 1,928 1,147 882 505 1' •.•n 1,129 5'0&
Ave,.._e L964 U&G lCll!I 418 ll 4,fe I.BU ,._
HOlH:
Nonfflttettd Wl1fl Ul t II ttllffllltdby ,u~trtnln1 Ille lo1'1 ll'lflt•1dwate1 uufror, ,~. 10111 o,;111II w11,r ~tc danlcn, IHI Nfor tylltffl
louu
Taps and Water Use Summary
The total number of metered and non-metered laps per customer category is
shown in Table 3.2 through Table 3.4.
Table 3.5 shows the estimated metered water use per tap for each customer
category from 2005 through 2011.
(0 Clear Water Solutlons, Inc.
Cl~ of Englewood
2013 Water ConaenaUon Plan
18
•
•
•
•
•
Table 3.2 -City of Englewood Mitered T1p1 by Cu ■tomer Category
Total
Year Slnale Multi-vanable Family Family Commercial Industrial Municipal Rite Taps taos taos taos taps taps
2005 5 308 650 959 13 7 6,917
2006 5,989 140 1,022 12 3 7765
2007 6,088 748 1,017 12 3 7,867
2008 6 221 759 1013 12 3 8,008
2009 6,336 ,766 1,013 12 3 8.129
2010 6,S72 792 1,063 13 3 8,4il2
2011 6 715 788 1,078 u 3 8,5'6
Table 3.3 -City of En9lowood Non-Metered Tops by Cu ■tomor Category
Total
Year Single Multi • Flied Family Family Commertial Industrial Municipal Rate Taps
taos taos taps taps taos
2005 2,601 225 8 2 0 2,836
2006 2:l62 .. -201 8 2 0 2.573
2007 2,249 !88 8 2 0 2.447
2008 2,146 \ri' 7 2 0 2.332
2009 2,047 175 7 2 0 2,231
2010 1,983 1G9 7 2 0 2,161
2011 1,897 168 7 2 0 2,074
Table 3.4 -City of Englewood Total Tap• by Cu1tomer Category
Year Single
Family
taos --··
2005 7 909
2006 R,151
2007 8,337
2008 8,367
2009 8,383
2010 8,555
2011 8,612
~ Clear Water Solutions, Inc .
Clly of Englewood
Multi•
Family
taos
875
941
936
936
941
961
956
Commercial lndustnal
taos taps
967 15
l 030 14
1,025 14
1,020 14
1,020 14
1,070 I~
1,085 14
Total
Munldpal Taps
taps
7 9m
3 10,338
3 10314
3 10340
3 10360
3 10,603
3 10 670
2013 Water Conservation Plan
19
Table 3.5-City of Englewood Water UH por Tap (mll1red cu1tom1r1)
Slnsle Multi•
Y~ar Family Family Commercial Industrial Municipal
acre· acre· acre -acre • acre-
feet/tao feet/tao feet/tao feet/tao feet/tao
200S 0.23 L14 1.3S 28.02 9.20
2006 0.26 1.22 L28 39.08 10.63
2007 0.23 1.26 0.94 38 .9S 7.58
_ioos 0.27 1.13 1.03 29.95 0.00
2()1)9 0.20 1.51 0.87 30.98 S.43
2010 0.23 1.22 0.81 31 .55 8.05
2011 0.22 1.20 0.81 36.09 s.1s
Awrue 0.24 l.24 1.01 33.S2 6.66
Per Capita water Use
Per caplla water use, both system-wide and res idential only. is a commonly used way to
gage an entity 's water use hablls . System-wide per capita use can vary significantly
between entitles depending on lhe type of non-residential customers within the system.
Englewood averages 171 GPCD system-wide with an estimated 89 GPCD for
residential uses from 2007 to 2011 as shown In Table 3.6 . Due to lack of specific
residential water use and population for non-metered rustomers, the resldentlal GPCD
may be skewed .
Tibia 3.6 -Clti, ol Englewood Per C1111lt1 Water U ■■
Total Water
Year Use (Met•rad
and Non-
Metered
acre -feet
2007 6,200
20011 6,641
2009 5,572
2010 6,105
2011 5.606
AvcraRe 6,025
e Claar Wator Solullono, Inc.
City of Engl1wood
Metered
Resl denllal Water
Use CstnaJund
Multi Family)
aa••feet
3,098
3,291
3,123
3,147
3,075
3,147
Population
32,191
32,191
)2,191
30 255
30,255
31,417
System Residential
WldeGPCO GPCO
172 ~
184 91
155 87
180 93
165 91
171 89
2013 W1tor Con11rvallon Plan
20
•
•
•
Indoor vs . Outdqor Use
In Colorado, a significant portion of water use typically occurs outdoors for irrigatlon . To
determine Englewood's average outdoor use . we assumed the average residential unit
would use 50 percent of the ir water for outdoor Irrigation 1•
Demand Forecast
The majority of Englewood 's hmd area was developed during the post World War II era,
between 1945 and 1960 . As is evident by the population data presented In Table 2.1,
Englewood's population growth Is limited and not expected to increase during the
planning period . Therefore, average water use (See Table 3.1) and averag,; water use
per tap figures (See Tabla 3.5) for the period of 2005 -2011 are used lo forecast future
water use .
' According lo oenver Waler dila
Cl Clear Water Solutlan1, Inc .
City of Englewood
2013 Water Con ■ervaUon Plan
21
CHAPTER 4 • WA.a'fR CONSERVAYtON GOALS
Goal Development Proceea
The development of water-savings goals for Englewood was a collaborative
process Involving Clear Water Solutions and City stall. Information was gelhered
from billing records end existing planning documents to properly characterize the
system, resources and water use . Development of this data showed the City's
largest water use customer categories, seasonal usage, system limitations and
losses, and oulllned the City's existing conservation efforts and their estimated
effectiveness .
We met with staff to discuss water-savings goals and the potential methods to
reach those goals . Initial reduction percentages were established and a
universal list of measures and programs were ccmpiled for consideration . The
goals focused on the water use areas that could be successfully impacted
considering factors such as water savings potenUal. c.osts, control, and public
acceptance.
Water Conservation Goals
•
Establishing water conservation goals is an Iterative process that begins with
quantifying the future demand for water based on current waler-use habits and •
Identifying areas water use can feasibly and affecllve1y be reduced. Englewood,
according to the Planning Department's projection, Is not expected to Increase Its
water demand through new growth . However , the City would still like lo reduce
overall demand by ten percent In the next ten years .
Discussions with City staff focused on the desire to continue and expand
Englewood's EMAP. EMAP takes lhe difference belween what lhe customer
pays for the non-metered rate and what the customer would pay for the metered
rate and uses that money to help pay Iha cost of installing the water mater .
Participation in EMAP is optional. If provided a grant by the ewes, Englewood
would like to expand upon their current program by providing 50 to 100 meters at
no cost to Iha customer while the customer continues to pay the flat rate charges ,
as further incentive for meter replacement. If the customer converts, the money
received by the City would go to providing a meter for anolher flat rate customer.
In addition to the EMAP expansion, City staff discussed possibly expanding
educational programs that encourage residential category (Single-Family and
Multi-Family water users) water conservation and may also imp!lcl the
Commercial and Industr ial customers as well. City staff discussed the desire to
explore performing a water rate study, which would ensure that the City has a fair
rate structure that could provide Incentives for customers to save water .
C> Clear Water Solutlona, Inc.
City of Englewood
2013 Wat■r Con...,,■llon Plan •
22
•
In setting initial water savings goals for the City, we looked at the current water use per
customer category and the limitations or the water supply system . Table 4.1 shows
Initial goals established for each customer category .
Table 4.1 -Englewood Water Coneervatlon Goal•
Total Projected
Water Use
Water Use Categories: 12013 to 20221 Reduction Goals for Plonnlna Horizon
(AF) ('6) (Afl
Slnale-Famllv 19,642 5,(J!(, 982
Multi-Family 11,602 5.(J!(, 580
Commercial 10,387 2.516 2(,()
Industrial 4,778 2.516 119
Munlcigal 225 0.5% 1.13
"on-Metered Customers -
Meter Replacement and
EMAP 18,207 15.0'6 2,731
Unaccounled-for Losses
I currently 9'J6) 5,836 a.OH, 648
Total Water Production: 70,677
Total Demand Reduction: 5,322
Total Percent Reduction: 8" _,
Lha:c;;our,Nel,,Fw Luu (tLI «,&IMI IOH ,.:. ,.,,~. 9'6} tlmtJ estim.ted p,o/OUldwtliW UN.
ReMaon ao,1 to, CA. oouats the difft:rcnco bol'Moen tA.o or"' Ortd tlro I.I.,: at lM fNJc~ ,.,. goal
/8 .°"/·
Hc»,.,_ttelCusrur,,.,, include ReJidlnlial, Ccmmtrtial 1111d lndu~lliaJ ..:W Uffl'J
Sinqle-fsmilv and Mutli-fsmifv Conservation Goats
The per-capita weter use In Englewood is oomparablo to the average in Colorado.
Considering that there are a number or existing measures that can be improved and
new measures that can be introduced, the reduction goal was set at five percent ror
Single-Family and Mulli-Family categories .
Commercial and Industrial Conservation Goals
The Commercia l category includes but is not limited to hospitality, restaurants, retail,
healthcare, car washes , and schools . Because there are many types or Commercial
GD Clear Water Solutions, Inc •
City of Engl-ood
2013 Wator Cone ■rvatlon Plan
23
and Industrial customers, actual savings are dllfleult to predict. For now, a goal of 2.5
percent Is estimated for the Commercial and lnduslrial categories .
Municipal conse,yatlon Goals
Englewood tracks water use In and surroi.nding Clty-o\\l'led properties . We estimate
that a 0 .5 percent savings can be achieved through water conservation measures
targeting this category.
Non-Metered customer Conseryat;on Goa ls
Eventually, all non-metered customers will be converted to metered customers . We
estimate that with the meter replacement and EMAP programs. a 15 percent savings
can be achieved lhrough water conservation measures targeting this category.
unaccotmted-for Losses
The average loss in the system due to leaks . record keeping errors. lheft, or lack of
measurement (non-metered customers) is estimated at about nine percent of the water
production. The goal for the City is to reduce the system losses by one percent bringing
them to eight percent.
Q Cl11r Waler lolullona, In~.
City of E"llawood
2013 Water ConHrvatlon Plan
24
•
•
•
•
•
CHAPTER 5 -CONSERVATIC>N MEASURES AND PROGRAMS
Water Conurvatlon MeaaurH and Programs
We developed a universal list of conservation measures and programs . The
mea ·iures and programs were placed Into five major categories : Utility
Mai ntenance Programs, Regulatory Controls and Standards, Educational
~g,c1ms, Rebates and Incentive Programs, and Audit Programs , The universal
lisl is shown in Tabla 5.1 with existing measures highlighted In green .
Screening Criteria
The following screening criteria were compiled based on discussions with staff.
The crileria were chosen as a general screening to pare down the universal list to
a list of measures and programs to evaluate further , including revieWing costs to
implement , expected water savings, and loss of revenue from the water savings .
Each measure and program in Table 5.1 was screened with the following criteria .
1. Staff Time
2 . Financial implications
3 . Political ramifications
Screening of Conservation Measures and Programs
The purpose of the initial screening was to create a list of measures and
programs that would be evali;.qted further in the planning process via a cost-
benefit an,,lysls . A meeting was held with City staff and Water Board to discuss
each measure/program on the universal 11st and eliminate ones that were not
feasible using the established screening criteria .
The list of measures was also evaluated to detennlne if the CWCB Minimum
Required Water Conservation Plan Elements were addressed. The required
CWCB elements include:
• Water-efficient fixtures and appliances. includ ing toilets, showerheads,
and faucets
• Low water use landscapes, drought resistant vegolation, removal of
phreatophytes (a deep rooted plant that obtains water from the water table
or the layer of soil just above It. Includes cottonwoods, tamarisk, etc.),
and efficient Irrigation
• Waler-efficient industrial and commercial water use processes
• Water reuse syslems
• Distribution system leak Identification and repair
C> Clear Water Solutions, Inc .
City of Englewood
2013 Water Consenatlon Plan
25
• Dissemination of lnfonnatlon regarding water use efficiency meaSU'es , Including
by public education . customer water use audits, and water-savin!J
demonstrations
• Water rate structures and billing systems designed lo encourage water use
efficiency In a fiscally respons ible manner
• Regulatory measures designed to t!ncourage water conservation
• lncentl'les to Implement waler conservation techniques , Including rebates to
customers
The screen ing was oompleted on October 31, 2012 and November 13, 2012. The
resulting decisions are noted on Table !l .1.
Table 5.1 -Unlvereal LIii of Con11N1tlon Me11ure1 and P,ogram•
Further
!valuatlon Comment
ut;;;:' -Utllltv Maintenance Pro1Uams
nwasuru water Mettr Convers ion I 1nc Citv would l ike to continue tne currfflt
& Prouam VC$ Yo, lor01.r;1T1
prop-am, tn11ewooe1 Mttl!r A\\1stance
r: .. -~--·-~-..
Pro.ram Yes , .. En ■ewood would llke to uoand tllls DfDlflffl
Meter Test1n1 and
Rtl"ll•,•ment Pr01ram
Sub-Meter Mobil e Home
Parb
Raqulre sub.f'T'4ltrlna,ln nM
rnulti-famllv houtln1
1n1tallln9 Miters in the
Olstrl butlon Svstemto
Lei~ Detection & Repel r
Pr?nam
Wk o.tection for MHtar
Mttar Communities
Leak Dttection In Mobile
Hom1Parlu
8Ullna5oft-Narc Uur.idcs
Water prO\l lder facility
ft1Cture uparades (Indoor and
outdoor)
Rtcyc llng WTP ~ilter
Bad.was!!..
Wattir ~JS@ ~Y"""'
® Clear Wator Solutlont, Inc .
City of Ena!ewood
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Ves
No
1es
Ve,
WM'lthey hllvtln ISSUl!:WUh a blll , tlltn they
No chKk •nd rHllce meter
No
No
No
Ya Aelvon e local cnmnanv to comnltte
No
NO
Yes Juitwrar.ided -will uoaradt11Ytrv 3 to Svun
Already havenewe, .tflcl1ntfl1Cture5 lnOty
No faclll tl~
EntlNOod r«yc.11!5 lO°"ofttw-hllckwa,h
y .. Willtr
Yes SHRecvct1n1 WTl' FIiter Bockwuh
2013 Water ConHrvatlon P18n
:ze
•
•
•
•
•
Con11rvllfon Mea111rw or ,..,.,.m Exlstlna
Dtmond Re1ul....,,, Controls M d Sllr.danls
1klt
me•ure, W•1e1 WHle Otdlni~~'; .. Remo¥al of PhrHt,:'-i,1!tytfS
prOlf'lfflf e.1 Cottonwoods ··-
Orou•ht Miti•ation ~r,1·,
Turf and L.tndsupe
Re5tr lc llom/Sland,rd1 for
New constructi on
:rr19aUon Sys tem
Requ lremt!nts/Standards tor
Ne·N construction
Wate, Rate Structure Chan•es
Genera l Evaluation of
Policies lhat Encoura1e
Wat11 savina,
Educllfonlll PrOKrams
Billing ~"Aff!fflli!hh That
~ater Savi run
Children's Water Festival
Xerlscape Garden
Oemons1t1tion
xe,ISCIDI!! Gardenl n• Clilnn
Xerlscas;e Program for
Commercial
xerlsca,e Prosrarn for Open
Sn.acelHOAsl
Schoot Cducauo, Proeram Ill:·
l2 Eduution}
Pon BMPs on Website or as
Bill Sl\lffers
Onlint Access to Wat•r Rill
,1nd Hhtorv
EduCldcnal Kits
Property Manager/~OA
Education ind Traln in•
Publlc Education • BIii
!ituffeu & Website
Sl!nd IT lrri&a tion Schedul ing
lnW11er BIii
«> Clear Water Solutlon1, Inc .
City of l!nglewood
...
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yts
No
No
Nu
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
F11r1her
Evaluation
...
No
...
Ne
No
...
v ..
...
No
No
No
No
No
v .. ...
...
Ye,
No .. ,
v ..
comment
ITheClty wo1.1ld llketo eaplorc e>ipendlnc
ort.llnan,es lhitlDfohlbll Wll!r w,1te
City does th is but ii is not required of the
1.eneral aubllc
Th• City will pursue drou1ht mltl1allon
plannln11 ,~a,· ttlyfromthls comerv1trion
1plann in1 tffo,1.
Re-evctluate wi th futu1~ ulctnnlmr: effc.Hb .
RIHYa luate with futvre clannin1 efforts .
A rate study m,y tk-'-conducted to determiM a
fa ir structure that¥1ill h@lp mulmlH w.cer
savin•s .
Cltv stiff would llke to evaluai.furthtr.
Program 10 bl! cnmblnewfth ET Schl!dulln&in
Water 8111 .
Refer to Denver Watu's Xerlscape Programs
Eichyur, Enalewood hosl'S school c.hlldr e n .it
the water treat1.1ent nlant for water dav.
Combined wit!, Public Educauon -BIii Stuffm
& Website Measure below
beainnin1 in 2013 , En&lewood water
custom,n will btibll! TO acCM\ the water bill
on tine ·-Will ev11uate further
Slaff limitations .
Comb ined wHt-BMP Me11ure above.
Comb ined wtt1, Billing Sta tement Measure
above.
2013 Wotor Conaorvatlon Plan
27
Conservation Measure or Proa,-n Extlllna
Rebates and Incentive Pro rams
Dlstrlbult Pre-rinse Spray
H•1W to flesi.u1fnts &
Institutions
Rebate Prosrams for Toi lets,
Cluth~, Wi:l)ht, \,
Dlshw1shers, r,.ucets and
Showtrh11ds
Reh3tes for ET (SMART)
Sor lnlcler SvsttmCcntrotlen
Zero hUCl"e)t Loan~ fu,
Washers
Weter ConseNetlon
Upsrade!o for City Facllltiu•
Outdnor
Wattr ConseN1tlon
Upar•det for City FacllltlH•
Indoor
Xtrlsc,pe Incentives for all
customer utet.orles
Irrl1at1on System Eff ici ency
Oev lte Rebates
Wind and/or Ruin Sensor
Rebates for Aesldtntial or
Commercial
Low Income Retrofit Proaram
Commcrcl.tl Water Audits
Residential h,dlt Kit
Spr inkle, Systtm Audit kit
and Instructions
1rrl1at1on Audit of Oty Parks
and Properti~
• Shaded cells represent l!ldst1ng musurts.
() Cl11r Wator Solutlon1, Inc.
City of Englewood
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
. .,
No
No
No
No
No
Further
Evaluation
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
v ..
Yes
No
No
Comm1nt
Stiff llmltlllons
Sl,lff llr.-,itallorts
Notlr.terested fo, fi nancial renons .
At•P.V•!uat~ with future n1annin1 r.ffnrts .
Ar-tv•lu•te with future Dlannin1 efforu .
R.-ev,luata with future al1nnln1 tfforu .
Cih' u.aff wculd like to evaluate further .
Clrv staff would like to evaluate further .
R~aluat:e with future plannin1 efforu .
2013 Water Con11rvatlon Plan
28
•
•
•
•
•
•
CHAPTER 6-EVALUATION AND SELECTION
The In itial screening of the measures and programs with City staff resulted In
selecting 15 measures for further evaluation . Englewood would like to evaluate
many of the eliminated measures with future planning efforts. Some of the
measures have been combined as noted in Table 5.1 . The benefits and costs of
the selected measures and programs are shown in Table 6,1 . The grouping of
t~ measures enabled us to consider like measures and avoid double counting
savings . Details about the cost-benefit evaluation and information about each
measure can be found in Appendix A.
Costa and Water Savings of Conservation Options
Prior to evaluating the potential cost effectiveness of the measures/programs, it
is important to understand the magnitude of typical Indoor and outdoor uses and
the contribution of each lo total demand . There is a wide rang1:1 of use related lo
each Indoor and outdoor measure that can affect the potential waler savings and
cost effectiveness accordingly . The assumptions for calculating water savings
used for this analysis were on the conservative end of the ranges found in the
available waler conservalion research to avoid overestimating savings .
Many resources were used to estimate water savings including Amy Vickers
Handbook of Water Use and Conservation, studies and papers from California
and Arizona, local studies available from the American Water Resources
Associalion, the Environmental Protection Agency, Western Resource
Advocates , information from other Co1orado municipalities, and the CWCB
website .
Table 8.1 provides a cost-benefit analysis for all of the measures and programs
previously identified to be evaluated further . A planning horizon of ten years is
used lo quantify the full benefit of these measures and programs. The costs and
water savings over the planning period are calculated assuming lh.;
measures/programs all start In Year One . This provides an equitable ranking of
t~e measures, so they can be compared on an apples-to-apples basis. In reality,
the measures and programs will be implemented according lo the
imp :ementation schedule developed in Chapters 7 and 8.
T~e first four columns (Columns A·D) of Table 11.1 Identify the conservalion
measure or program and quantify the costs to the City. These costs Include
annual costs for materials, staff time. and one-time start up cosls. The lable then
quantifies water savings annually and for the entire ten-year planning horizon .
Annual water savings and projected lost revenue are based on full
,:, CIHr Water Solutions, Inc..
City of Englewood
2013 Water ConHrvatlon Plan
29
implementation. This gives the City an Idea of the anticipated water savings and
estim3ted revenue impacts after full implementation.
f'h<J cost per 1,000 g11llons of water saved Is found by dlvldlng the total cost by the total
water savings for the entire ten-year period. The measures and programs are then
· ll1ked by cost per 1,000 gallons saved . This ranking helps to determine which
m1tasures will be more effect ive and to suggest a useful order of Implementation .
~ Claar Water Solution ■, Inc.
City of Englewood
2013 Water Conaarvation Plan
30
•
•
•
t1bll t .1 -Co1\IS1vlna1 An1lytl1 ol Con11rnUon M•••urn ond P1011r•m•
c.i11,-11Lo.iu•tt-1
'·"·'"""' ........ , .... ,., •. '-""'tl l"'-l
(Al N11MolCICIIIMM"'"_II_Wllfllll'lll'I
IIIOl'lldl'ff .. MtlMINtHlll ... 111.01¥fflf'M1110....,.fflGrfMIIIIN
lt'1t..t.l,.,..aW'fl,wt,,, .. ,1,,,.,.tlllflel""'1aw.o,pl'lllral'I
(r)tMIW'1111111tflllcl1Kh.,.tr 'Ol'lach""ll!l lhltdor /o11Mwllol111'1H._Ol',, .. II"'
UI llt,1 r.,btfofprucij1Mh ,..,a.a ,o .. rtlclc,Meo:lldmlll:1 ... lllllll fHoudll,.....
tJITetll•11',W ... -11l110 .. 11ff-1hmtlUlllf.....,.m(illl'lllll~p10flJMGl
1c1r..iwt1t1IN .. lff11-•Ml1otol'l .. .,,, .. ,..,.nod;...tc1NbaiNOft lM1"1Ulfll .. U•14etr.tfldor•f1 ••d1111PH-ICl11J,GI
l"I ... N.1tcflew«01inwt0t1wlll-a.P114!IW .. •••Wf•-•
lllleta11,...i~~-i.ror:,,,i.,d11Jlhe111-i1tff_..._,
IJlllltll-tolmplt11WfllW .... :••IMlllll10l'Jl'Olfllft-t!tlropl,IWll .. 111'r.od,ltld;,dlf'lllllll .... eptllllo",OflO t!1111wt 11pCDllf
llttnd1,.-i N n ,..1 loot"-W>•l'-t1 .. .....
4Uc.eot•r U1111u:toat ..... d•-.lca,l ... t~ ... 1111P1rloddi¥1dfodi,,WU1"""r ...... ,p1.,,.1 .• ..,riec1
11&N1U,tff11fl-1t"'liorot""-'--ICIINOIIClfptlUID&tilot11elw,tt11,1\'td,lewtlltot t.'lt n
• c11,, w,,., loluUofll, Inc . 20'\3 Water CoflHl"Vlllon Pltn
C'ty ot E"IINOOCI ,,
Comparl1on of Ben1flt1 and 0ff!e
Tho resulting rank of moa ■uro, by r.oat -beneflt Is shown il, Table 8,2 below . The cost
l)()r 1,000 go/Iona Gavod rangoa lrom $0.00 to $10.70 . The rr.oasur.JS are ranked fairly
evenly throughout tho nvo cetogorio~. For the $0.00 per 1,000 gallon saved measures ,
we did not c:onalder the coats to tie City, es the City will continue these measures
regardleea or coat .
The rankings 1110 a ,,-,ult or th11 ratio or cost, includi~g lost revenue , to water sav,ngs.
For Instance , 0 1111, 'l ~.ortw,ue upgrades help Englewood save a iair amou~t or water.
However , th11 rr.•' re lative to the water savings Is high, so it ranks lower than one might
expect This la c.11/y a cost per watar p ;ed ranking . There are other factors to
con1lder, wh ich will be accomphshed ,n a second screening .
Tabla 1 .2 -Cost-Ben1flt Ranking
Rink <:on11rv111on Mtnures and Pro.,....,
wa er Ml!ter necracement ·n.,.ram
2 R1C11cllna WTI' FIiter Backwash
3 Rasldcntlal water audits
4 Enalewood Meter A .. 1,tance Proaram CEMAP) ··-s Leak Detection & Reoalr
6 Educational Kill
1 Gtnaral Evaluation of Policies that Encourage Water Savings
8 COnt'111n:lal & Industrial water audits
9 Online .~ccess to Water BUI and Hlsl;>N
10 WaterW,.;te Ordinance
II Water Rates •h•!_!r:.,courage Wator Savings
12 School Educ.. 'rORram {K· 12 Educaltonl
13 Public Educatk .. • Newslerter, 8111 Stuff•"• Website
14 Distribute ET Irrigation Scheduling In Water 8111
1S Blllln1 Software UORradCS
Evaluation Criteria
After each of the conservation measures and programs were ranked by cost per 1,000
gallons saved, as shown in Table 6.2, the next step was to select conservalion
measures and programs for implementation . The criteria used for selection are as
follows :
1. Staff Time
2, Financial Implications
3. Political ramincations
Ill CtHr W1tor Solutton1, Inc .
City of Inglewood
2013 Water Conservation Plan
32 •
•
•
•
Selected Conservation Measures and Program•
The second screening was accompl ished by evaluating each measure/program based
on the screening criteria and Englewood 's overall goal for this Water Conservation Pian .
As mentioned previously , further detail on the conservation measures and programs
chosen in lhe final selection are found in Appendix A.
E~'!n though the EMAP measure was not the highest rankod measure in the cost•
benefit analysis , Englewood would like to make this program a top priority. The City
would li ke to expand upon their current program by providing 50 lo 100 meters , at no
cost to th e customer , as further incentive for motor replacement . The City hopes to
significantly Increase the meter conversion rain for their non-metered customers .
In Chapter 4, conservation goals were establ 'sheJ for eight customer categories :
• Single-Family : 5% • 982 AF
• Multi -Fam ily. 5% • 580 AF
• Commercial : 2.5% • 260 AF
• Industrial : 2.5% · 11 g AF
• Municipal : 0.5% • 1.13 AF
• Non-Metered Customers : 15% -2,731 AP
• Unaccounted-for Losses : 8% • 648 AF (of savings)
The selected conservation measures/programs and associated water savings were
arranged within the targeted customer categories lo more easily compare the
anticipated sa vi ngs to the original goals . Some of the r,,easures contribute savinge to
more than one category . Table 8.3 shows the water saving s for the stilecled measures ,
sub-totaled for each category.
Tabla 8.3 -Combined WIier Saving ■ of Salectad Con ■ervat lon M111uru and Program•
Conservation Measuies and Proanms
Svstcm losses
Bll llnRSoftware Upgrades
Recvd1n1 WTP FIiter Backwash
Leak Detection & Reoair
iCI Clear Water Solutlons, Inc.
City of Englewood
Subtotal • MG
Aem-FHt
Estimated Annual Estimated Total
Water savtnss Water Savings
after full over Plann i ng
Implementation Period
(MG) (MG)
S.8 28.8
23,0 230.3
23.0 230.3
51.8 48!1 .4
159 1,502
2013 Water Conaarvetion Plan
33
Conservation Measures and Prosrams
Non -Metered Customer -Meter Reotacement and EMAP
Water Meter Replacement
Enalewood Meter Assistance Proaram IEMAPI
Water Waste Ord inance
~
S11111le-F1mllv
Water W3ste Ord i nance
Water Mates that Encouraae water sav lna,
School Eaucat1 on
Educational Kits
Public Education
On line Access to Water Bill and 111s torv
Distribute IT lrriaatlon Schedul ina in Wate r Bill
R"'identlol Water Audits
Multl•fll'IIIIY
IWaler Waste uralnanc.e
Water Rates tut Encouruc Water savlnas
ScnoOI Eaucat ion
tducatlOna Kit<
Public tauca11on
un11ne Access to water t1111 ana H1storv
Distribute ET 1m•at1on Schcdullna In Water BIii
Reuaen11a1 water Aualts
comm•HJ-
Water waste urainente
Water Rates that 1:ncouraae water sav1nas
l'UDUC taucat1on
Online Access to Water BIii and HISION
DISUIDUtM tT lrrl11tlon scneaullna In Water BIii
omrnerc ia 1 ana lnaustn11 water Aualts
Industrial
water waste ura1nanr.P
water Kates tnat Encourne water sav 1n1s
un ne Access to Watt!r Bill and Hhtorv
ommerc ill ana 1nau5trla1 Water Auo lts
~ Clear W■t■r Solutlona, Inc.
City of Englewood
Subtotol · MG
Aett-FHt
Subtotal • MG
Aett-Feel
fa,.
Aett-,-eel
Sunrntal•M'1
A,,._~Ht
Suototo, . '"'u
Ac,r-,..,
fitlmated Annual Estimated Total
Water Sa"'"BS Water Savings
aftor full over Planning
lmplement1tlon Period
IMGI IMGl
5.1 278.9
10.1 557.8
1.5 14.8
16.7 151.5
51 2,613
1.6 16.0
IU 128.0
3.2 32.0
3.2 64.5
6.4 64.0
6.4 64.0
3.2 32.0
0.08 24.0
36.9 424.S
113 1,303
no •
7.6 ,,6
no I.S
2.0 1
,.8 7.8
3.8 7.8
1.9 18,9
n20 ,,. n
21' ., ..
65 1302
n.R a.s
6.8 17.7
3.4 3.8
3.4 3.8
1.7 ..
07 36.2
16.7 197.n
51 ....
0.4 3.9
•.I 31.l
16 ...
I.I .,.,
6 111
19 W\
2013 Water Cons ■rv■tlon l'lan
34
•
•
•
•
Estimated Annual Estimated Total
Water Sav ina, Water Sav lnp
Con11rvatlon Measures and Proaram1 afterfull over Plann l ns
IIHIJ1@111~11l i!llon Period
IMGl IMGl
MUntDDI
Fvalu•llnn nf Pnllr.les to Encc:,_uraRe WalP.r SavlnOI 0_04 0.37
Sullrotol • M<> n ,n.t n 17
~Feet 0.11 1.13
Grand Tutol -/MG 150 2498
Ac,..FHt 4511 7,665
Grond Toro/ Savino• from Elllstlno Measures IA~F..tl 161 USl
These savings were compared to the original goals set in Chapter 4. As mentioned
earlier, water conservation goal selling is an iterative process ; original goals are
established, conservation measures are evaluated and selected based on appropr iate
criteria , and the resulting waler savings are compared to the original goals . In this case ,
the resulting waler savings are close to the original goals .
Tabla 6.4 corr -ares the anticipated water savings lrom the selected measures with the
ortglnal goals and then adjusts the water-saving goals for this plan .
Table 8.4 -Water ConHrvatlon Goal ■ Comp1rl1on
Toul
PrwJ-d
W1terU1e
Wlt■rU1ecata10rl11: I lzou to ,m:,1
Sln1le •flmllv
Mulll-Famllv
CommP.rclal
Industrial
Munlcin~I
Non Mc:lcrod Cu stomers
Metll!r R~pl«.e111t!11t dlld
tMAP
Unaaountect-for Losses
(currently 9K)
Total W,at e, Pu.xlU(l1011 :
Iota! U•m•nd R•duct lon :
Total Percent Reduction :
~ CIHr Water 8olutlon1, Inc .
City of Englewood
IAF)
19642
11602
103117
4,778
225
18 207
5,836
70,677
Reduction Goals
forPl1nnln1
Horizon
1%) (AF)
5.1171 982
5.0!1 580
2.5% 260
l.5% 119
05!!\ 1
1.1 .0!I 2 731
8.0!1 G48
5,JU
8'11,
ToulWmr
Savln11fft'"l'I Adjuste4 Rlducdon
Soltcttd Re11ld111 Goals for Plannln1
""'"r■ms Rlduellon Hort1on
(AF) (!I) (%) IAF)
I l03 6.G!I G.5% 12n
1,l02 11.2" 11.0!I 1,276
l',04 S.1111, S.5% 571
348 7.111 7.0!i :~
1 01!(, o.~% 1
2,613 14.4'1 14.4% 2 613
1,502 6.711 8.0% G48
7.66~ 6,721
11% 1!111
2013 Water ConHrv ■tlon Plan
Over It!'! ten-year planning period, the selected measures/programs provide an overall
esllmatllfl water savlngR of 7,865 acre-feet. This Is higher than the lnltlal water savings
goals set In Chapter 4. The Non-Metered Customer category goal was adjusted down
to 14 .4 percent from the lnlllal goal of 15 percent, to reflect the estimated savir111s from
the selecllld Non-Metered Customer program. Goals for all other categories, with th11
except!o11 of the Municipal category, were adjusted up from the original City goals. The
Adjusted aoals reflect the goals believed to be ubtal~ .. tile by City staff .
After the goals were adjusted to better refiect the expected water savings, the estimated
water use reduction Is 6,721 acre-feet or ten percent. Therefore, Englewood wlP target
a reduction In Its water use by ten percent over the next ten years becaui;e of
Implementation of this plan.
® Ctt ■r Waler llolullona, Inc.
City of En9towood
2013 Water Con11rvallon Plan
30
•
•
•
•
CHAPTER 7 -INifEGRATE RESOURCES AND MODIFY
FORECASTS
Englewood operates In a manner to make the most efficient use of its resources .
Each year, a budget is carefully developed wth the given funding and personnel
avaiable . While water conservation has been an effort that has been gradually
Incorporated. lmplemen:ation of the measures and programs selected In this plan
will requ ire reevaluation of staff resources and pursuit of additional funding in the
form of grants .
Implementation Schedule
Water sav ings result h:J from Implementation of this Water Conservation Plan will
occur gradually as lhR City has the resources to implement each selected
measur(:o and program and the water users respond to that implementation .
Grant availability \\111 be crucial In the timing of Implementation .
The followng table proposes a schedule of implementation . For Illustrative
purposes, a three-year schedule has been proposed and should be interpreted
that Year 1 Is the City's fin;t priority of projects followed by YI ar 2 and then Year
3 and will not be within three years exactly . The proposed ln tt>lementalion of this
Water Conservation Plan will occur as the necessary resourc;,s become
available .
This table does not hiclude existing measures that are already implemented ani:
are not scheduled for expansion and Improvements . Those measures in , ,de
recycling WTP filter backwash and billing software upgrades . The City w11I
continue ther.e programs as Is . However, the City would like to expand upon
EMAP, water waste ordinances and the school education program, so these
measures are included in the implementation schedule .
~ Clear Water Solullona, Inc.
City of Englowood
2013 Waler Conservation Plan
37
I
1 11tl/ifvM1rA,t,,.nff,,911romJ
!
j ..,,_.,o,,. r,o,,c'.1n.'1 l!ro,ro'"
""'°'''°"'".,.,,.
-hll'W'Sltrlfllrd,,OototfG
I ldtlanlrMOll'r-,,llffflJ
Wot••d.w.ttM ,.,.._...,
UtilfrMINllllfMMll'rogtOnB
fidvattlMal,,,...,.,.,
--•flfHlnMflrwl'rop-,...,.,,.St.,.,.,,,,,..,.,.
0 Clo., Wat11r lahrtione, Inc. c.,o1•og1-
MeMUrt/PrOarMI
'/EAR 111ST PRIOIIITYI
Jnl.4~ ~ Ai,"lllnt•Ptmium IFM4Pt
Utn••I lvtl,1t1on ot foll ti ft '1111 fncour,pW.11«
~llltlll
Wlltr WutaOrdlnart
SchoolC~tio)l'!Proi,lmll:•l2t1h1~111•1
CnNMtcc••-W•-1111 1nd lti 1tcN
VIAR 11:IND PRIOHYI
OrO\f&t':t Mlttptlon,hr
Publlc [CU(a~on · ffN\ltltcr, 8111 Stufte:,, Wdnflt
Di nrlbtltw n e,ri ptiOft Schedullfll '"' Weier Dill
.,,_Jdl!nt111-""""'"
YEAR• "RD P-,YI
l.1111 Dftecaan I llflll.li,
(doutlMlllKih
CotMIWcill I lndHtTIII Mllf n,b
WUfl fl•le lfwlfN.uu1epW1te 54,i.
lmpllf'l'lt"tltlon ComldtratlDM
~1.1HT1rn,,II r1 :rlfin1
s11H11m,.
SUiff TIIM I Cio~«l'lll'llnlll Action
SUH TUM & fUl'dN'II
Staffli-
fulkf.l'\IBSlln Tl mt
SUffnm._,u,dlncl."r-xu,ern111t of
Mltp.·11:,
Suffnrnc, rul\dlnc& :ar owr.,..,101
Mltttll'J
Sc,ffn_., ruidlnt& 'rlX.UfeMonol'
Mlte'IIIS
Fvndh•I SWffflmc
Su.ffnnw,,,1111clrc&Procure"11e,tol
Mllftll ll
)Uffllfflt
f!Uldl"1ISC.ffn-
31
•
•
The total cost to Implement the conservation plan I$ $291,625 (th is figure Includes the
costs for the initial year of operation). The implementation schedule will be most
affected by available staff time and funding . While this schedule may be optimistic, the
goal is to allow time for researching and obtaining grants to develop sound programs for
a higher probablllty of success .
It sh.iuld be noted that the implementation costs include both cost to implement the
water conservation measure/program and staff time associated with the implementation
and ts not necessarily representative of the capital outlay requirement. Please refer to
Appendix A for the detailed breakdown of costs for each measure/program .
Modified Demand Forecast and Be11efits of Conservation
As mentioned previously, the total~· ejected annual water demand (without water
conservation) for Englewood is estimated at 6,484 acre-feet. The anticipated annual
savings , after full implementation Is approximately 460 acre-feet, reducing the annual
demand to 6,024 acre-feet annually .
Benefits of Water Conservation
Because Englewood has sufficient water supply and treatment capacity . this planning
effort will not delay any future 'mprovement projects or put off water supply acquisition .
However , Englewood Is still committed to conserving their water supply for the benefit of
their r,ustomers and the broader region.
C> Clear Water Solullons, Inc.
City of Englewood
2013 Water Conservation Plan
39
CHAPTER 8-PLAN OF iMPLEMENiATION AND MONITORING
The schedule for implementation is presented in Table 7.1 In Chapter 7. The
prcx;ess for implementing 'he plan and mon itoring ils success is ouUlned in this
chapter.
Public Participation
One of CWCB'a requirements for a State-approved Water Conservation Plan is
to solicit publ ic comments on the draft plan for not less than a 60-da:• period
unless otherwise specified by Cily policy .
Through this water conservation planning process, the public was notified and
given 60 days to comment. Appendix 8 Includes affidavits from the local
newspaper and Englewood's Citizen Newsletter that legal notice was published .
The plan was available on Englewood '~ website and at the Utilities Department
for review. Written comments and responses to those comments are included in
AppendlxC .
Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring the success of this Waler Cons : :vation Plan includes measuring
water use as well as money spent on the selected conservation measures and
programs. Customer class water use will be monitored for programs such as a
water rate study. Table 8.1 presents the lnfomnatlon that will be tracked for each
measure proposed by the City . More specific mon itoring infomnalion will be
developed as each measure is implemented.
Many of the costs evaluated In the cost-benefit analysis includo annual costs for
follow up . This will allow staff to specifically set aside time to monitor and
evaluate the success of the conservation measures and programs. Expenditures
for conservaUon will be documented by staff and reported to City Council on a
regular basis. This will be valuable lnfomnallon In evaluating the cost-benefit rallo
and to validate Iha success of implementing the selecte(J conservation measures
and programs . Since the programs will be Implemented in phases, there will be
time to evaluate and establish tho appropriate method to monitor success of
each program and measure .
Pl ■n Updates and Revllliona
The required schedule ror updating the Water Conservation Plan is seven years .
The progress towards achieving the water-savings goals will be monitored on an
annual basis by Englewood . The City may choose to update this plan prior to
seven years if implementation and adual water savings deviate too much from
these projections. This deviation may be caused by several factors including
Cl Cle■r Water Solution,, Inc.
City of Englowood
2013 Wate, ConHrvatlon Plan
40 •
•
less than anticipated participation and the inability to implement the plan due to la<-~ of
staff availability or funding .
Plan Adoption and Approval
Arter the public comment period, the comments were incorporated into the plan . The
Englewood City Council lormally adopted the plan prior to submittal to CWCB for final
approval. The resolution is attached as Appendix D. lmplementallon will begin altar
CWCB approval is received . It is only after final CWCB approval that Englewood will be
eligible for a weter-efficiency grant through CWCB for plan Implementation .
® Clear Wiler Sot•liona, Inc.
City of l!rt9l1wood
2013 Water Conaervatlon Plan
41
Table I . 1 -Tracking Maltla forMonllaring Water Conurvatlon Mutul'ff
""'
(dt,oe1UIN'I, lt-llU.....uan
~ctu._Ulllon -1'i•••••••••lllJ Slutf..,.Wtblill
Oiurillu'• n lrii ut rw1 St""llllinll 111 w11 .. , ,.II
an,..'-,_ UNIMtt
=i':,1 ::~ 0 ~1:
1
:;;, ,,r uoru UMCCIJJMH :;:~,! ~;:1
llinaw-1 Wat" JU •JM Wtltr lllt 'Olw.ttf wa:,,OIIT'.11/lcl
ci ,1 , ,
,
, , , , , ,
,
, , ,
, , , , , , , , ,
-r-, , , , , , , ,
,., !!2ll1.
1i.11u'11 Nro'rtlr11t,1"4/o•
,1 .. ,,..¥1•11tltlndtd ror
lh»tia\1t.1l!1IIOt11011t i'lt••
l111t1Wttltr1 -~I blt1tckdlO
••t1m,INlltlf'IIPltlNII
oc:;l,j'fld.
lCl"-•inHl!lhUlltd
1.-t'fll N l-lfdtltltl"M
tlllbetfld.tllllOOIMIW!'t ,.,,,.,,,
fOIAnluctlM IIIUltG.l'to-\apf,
t.ipl:1W1111\llt-.rlilllll'Olllffl
l7Wnll1W11111
Ill ''-• _,,.,,,. trw~ '""
Cl\atlttl'IMl:lllltdlWl l rt
tllPJlly .. MtnlltN
l'lbll~t1V111 l111H11'-•r,i1
OCIHr W1t1r Solulon1, Inc.
CltyofEngll.ood
2CIU W1t1r C0l'lllr.'1001'1 Plln
4.1
•
•
REFERENCES:
Amencan Water Works Association, 2008. Water Conservation Programs -A Planning
Manual . Manual of Water Supply Practices M52 .
The Brendle Group, June 2006 . Northern Colorado Action Plan for Industrial,
commercial, and Institutional (ICI) Water conservation.
City of Englewood, 2008 Budget V3, July 15, 2008 .
City of Englewood Comprehensive Plan . May 2002 .
City of Englawood Municipal Code, Section 13.04.080 , Newly Adopted Water Rates
Effective June BIiiing C·.~le. June 2006 .
City of Englewood Water Supply and Demand , for Windy Gap Firming, October 13,
2004 .
Englewood Drought Response Plan , December 2007 .
Harvey Economics , Water Supplies and Demands for Participants in the Northern
Integrated i<.1pply Project. 2004.
HOR Eng ineering , Inc . Water/Wastewater Master Plan , 1996.
HOR Eng ineering, Inc. Water Master Plan Updated, Mf.y 2005.
Klien, Bobbie, Kenney , Doug, Lowrey, Jessica , and Goemans, CMs . Factors
Influencing Residential Water Demand : A Review of the Literature (Updated 1/12/07).
U.S . Environmental Protection Agency , 2007 . Cases in Water Conservation : How
Efficiency Programs Help Water Utililies Save Water and Avoid Costs .
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, August 8, 1998 . WATER CONSERVATION
PLAN GUIDELINES , Appendix B.
Tetra Tech RMC, Memorandum from Doug Seeley regarding Water Demand
Projections, September 8, 2003 .
Vickers , Amy, 2001 . Hanauook of Water Use and Conserv..:.tlon : Home, Landscapes,
8usiness, Industries, Farms. WaterPiow Press , Amherst, MA .
Water Conservation Alliance of :,outhern Arizona , 2003 . Evaluation and Cost Benefit
Analysis or Mun icipal Water Con .;e,·vat ion Programs .
Western Resource Advocates, 2000 . Water in the Urban Southwest
C, C:lear WIier Solutlona, Inc .
City of Englewood
2013 Wat• Con1ervotlon Plan
43
Englewood Meter Replacement Progr.im • Existing Measure
The City,., working to convert the nat rate cu1tome,s to variable rutv customers as accounts chsnge owne,s.
P11n11lna Pertod._! __ .....;:io=u ... 10'-"'lO"'l"'"l __ __.
'fears 1n Plann1n9 Period 10
l'ro1ram Lensth'"! ______ IU------,
Estima~d Water So,i s
l1tlffl11td Annual Water Slvtn1, ____ s __ .1 __ MG/vr
htltn1tld Slvinll over Plannln1 Period .Zll.9 MG
Costs
Total Cost to Water J rovic:ltf
M1terl1II (OIU
unil Cost I $0.001/year
Number of Put:Cii,anu so. /year
Annual Materl1 l,~---:$,c-O.-,.OO,'/yt1r
Hotts:
Enoltwood h,i sovrd an owirogt 12.8
MG/y,ror fox an oimogt of 121 tops/Ytor
from 1006-101 J fa savings tat, of about
J0J,4J J gal/)ap/yro,}.
Estlmattd Sovfnos O'l tr Pfannlt1q Prtrlod 11
colcuiatt'J by compounding tht esrlmottd
annual wottt SOYlngs ptr tht total numb tr
of porticiponrs for l'OCh giVfft ~,.
For this pt09rom, morttiol cosu art tht
responslbllit; of tht custome-r. Labor co st~
ort not (iJfl)idt1ed. Tht rrplaummr n1tr
Ii tit~cttd ro bt ~r t ha11 ortroge, at
opofOKfmartf~ 50 toPslvtor.
l1tlmateai Annual Colt $0.00 /'¥rm
E~tedTo\11 C.tov1t Ptln111n1 Pw!od lndudln1Set-up __ .-a;So:;;;.oo;.a.
Cost pe, 1000 Gallons Snod $0.IIO
Englewood Meter Assistance Program (EMAi'} • Exl:irlng Meosu~ •
The EMAP JJIOfTlm faJcH 1:ti, dfffertnct b,r~·Hn whal lht \·urtom<11 pay, for th• non-mototad rot• ,no what tho cun,mo,
would pay /of lht ,,,.,...,, ,.,. Ind .... ,,,., mon,y to /le lp PIY /Ii, COIi of lnstdno tn• ,...,., """'· Enoltwood WOUkl Ike lo
oxpandupor, ,,,.lrcurrentprogrom byp,ollidir.g 50to -100me!ers, elno co,t to tlttcu,tome,, •• funher~nt,'W for meter
repltcemtnt.
Plonnlns Porlod~I --~2•~1~1t~•~l~02~2--~
Vear,ln PliMlng Perloo~ ___ ..,;l;;O ___ ~
.,..,.... ...... ~1 ____ 1 __ 0 ___ ~
Estfmatld Water Savings
Eltlrnlted AIWJal Wltff SiV1"1' __ ..,1:;o __ MGfyr
fulm1tac:1 Savina• ewer ,t1nnln1 Pertod 557,1 MG
Costs
Total Cost to Water Provtder
Unit Coit I $500.001/unlt
N~,;::~:i:~::~~:~--c$-SO-,IIGO-,l~.:-·~:::
Notes:
Englrwood hos savtd on OYff09t JZ.8
MC/ytor /o f On Ot'Cl'oVf' of J11 topV'ftt,r
from 2006·401 J (a sowin,s ratt d abckit
JOJ,4JJ JIOl/t11p/)ru1J , The onni.al w~ln gs
rcfl«t the rtplarrmcnt of JOO mrtm.
fJrlmored ScrwngJ ""'' Planttln.J PrrlOd Is
ca itufotH bv compotlMin, ritf Nfimotrd
011"uof wattr sovmgs ptr tht' totol num~
cf oartlclpottU for coth Q1\ltn -;car.
For this program, EnglcNoed ""'14110 par
tht cost tc rt111act Ult mtttr. AJ "'1th tlw
Mtttr Rtplottment Program, lob« COJ b
ort not consldc,H. Nl/1 prc,orom II
onli<ipul~ to i,iu~w :Jw '"""'~' i:,(
mttHton~rsion too total of l]0-150
mtttr. rtpfOCfCl/ftofeotnb/Md Wl !h rn,
Mdt, Rtplottm~r Prog,om
~lm111d Ann1t1I Cost $50100-.,,JO /year
(sthMttG Total Cost OVtr Pl•r,nln1 Pe"-d lndudlne Set~ $5001000.00
Cmt ,-, 1000 Gallonl Snitcl $0.,0
•
Leak Oden/an and Repair Program
This me,su,e would lndudB llectronlc 1111' d1tection by• third party consutr,nt 81111)15 yee,s.
,,.,.,,,. Pertadl~ _____ 20=u ... 1 ... o ... 10._1_2 _ __.
Yea"ln PlaM l,wPeriod~ ____ 1_0 ___ _
Program Frtquer,cy 2 years
Esrtmortd Wor,r Sovtogs
Casi>
Annual htlrmttd Savlnas R•t•I~-~'·-°"--~
AMu;d Eslimatfd Water PtoductlOn wlthcul
~..,lrgs 2,303 MG/yr
ht~,,;it,~d Water P1oductlon m,P.r :»fannffla
P,rlorf without ~vir.g, 11,030 Mr•
htlmltitd Annu•I Witt:, S.W111 23 'l<lt(;/yr
lnlmattd 541\o'MIS Olltr PtlMlfll hrkM:t __ ~ Ml:
Norts :
C11rrMI ,,,.,,."" l,oltog,/toss rott Is
,.,tlmntM ot ""·
Tht tstimottd produrtlon (without
sovinosJ tt;uals tht orOitdtd wottr u1aot
pfuss•.
Total Cost to Water Provldtr
LMCHCoS1s Notes:
Thtl I.I Party Coits (leak Oelec:tlan Consut1) $109,Hl,'! /year Tht City may tvaluott appro,,mattly 501'
of ttitlr .sv,ttm (waltr mains} tvtrv S
years. Cost tsrlmatt for an outJldt
conwlt1111t ~o perform tlectronic teak
dtt«tfon b $0.25 ,:,tr foot , T>ttte/ou:. a
165.7 milt system ct{ pipeiint would total
$109,361.00.
-•led M,.,.I Coll $109,362.GO f,/eir
Eltimated Totll Cost over Planning Period lndudlnc 5tHlp $211,724.00
CCJlt ,-, 1000 Gallons S.vtd -----roTs
Blllln11 Software Up11rades -Elll1tln11 Measure
Softwera upgrades 11/Jnw wttter providers to quidd·1 And udy 1'11trNtw, water usao, dltt111tnd rwlay th#llt dllle to their cullomflrs.
helping cu,tomer.r ,o monitor thefr we,e, uaege and cons.-v.,don, Sollwate upgratJN help Slaff to identify 1y1tem problems,
ftuJty ,,.,e,, and dit dnr,uilh NMen WllotMr e1i.goM1. n.. CJty UP{lt'ldtt lhtir billing 1y,t,m t\lW,Y tine lo ~"• ,.a,1.
Pl1n nin1 Period\~--~l0~1~3 •~•-'2~02~l--~
Yt1rs In Pl1n,,1 ~t'enod~ ___ ...;la:O ____ ,
Pro1ram Lenath years
Estimated Wateor Savings
E1tlmated ,.,.,.,.1 Water S.vlnp __ -'s"".I __ MG/yr
Enlma,ed S&vln11 over Plannlna Period H .8 MG
Costs
Total Cost ta Wat1:r Provider
Annual M1ttrtll1 Costs
Annu11 M1tert111 $u,ooo.oo /ynr
Ona nma Lobor •nd Meltrill ColU
So~wnre Uptrade __ ::;:Sl:ctO.,.ooo=.00:::.
tlottJ.
Ctmmt 1)'Slem lrokogt/JOU rDlt Ii
tstlmotH ot ,-, Softv,o,• upfrodn or•
tStimatto to ltdUCI or,portnt IOISIS thot
o«vr -Jue to blnlt1g S)'Sftm CtrON byo
ouarttr o/ ~ctnt.
T11,-,,1r1m ,tttl prnd11rtlolt lwitlmur
,uv;,r;,J d'.fitul> t/lr p,ufrctn/ wutr:t ll)UVt"
plu,fM,
•nr.unlmnln t,nonrt rn~ k JO. cf
UP(tUdttjn, 10JJ •10J2upgrode ~wai.
opprtximot•,'y $1 J0,000
btlmalld Annual Coll Upl.000.0D tvear
lS11ffllttcl fotll cost aver Pl1nn1na Perlld lndudlnl Sit-up $30l,DIIJ.OD
CCIII per 1000 G■lan, S•wed $10,70
•
•
•
•
•
•
lletytllnQ WTP FIiter Botltwash • ExlstlnQ Meosun
Cutrenrty, f 00 perc,111 o! fhe bacfcw•sh at the City wHtt we,., trNlmMI plant 111 recycled bnck intn lhn rnatment /)loces,.
'"""'"• Pt!riortl~----1 ... 01 ... i .. ,n ... 2 ... n __ n ___ ~
YHn In Pl•nnln1 Parlod 10
P,01t1rn ltmav,r! -----,o-----,
Estimated Wot,r Sa11lnps
Ptann1n1 Pertoo s,vtngs 11a11 __ ..,1.01<=---
Enlmat1d Amull w,11, Savfnp u.o MG/yr
lstlm1ttd S1vln11 ovtr Pl1nnln1 Period UO.J MG
Cosu
Total Cast to Water Provider
Mlte,l1l1COIU
Unil Colt I S0.001/unh
Number of P1r1lclpan11 ... _____ o.,_l,yeor
Annual Malttlilll SO.DO /yt141
Hom:
EngfNOOd m1mcct'S mor J" of the toM
ftn,trd wvt,, I) 1a:ydN.
ht I mated Arwu.111 Cott $0.00 /ye,r
btlmlttd Total COit over Pllnnln1 Pttlod lnckKllna Sat,up __ ...a;So'".ooca.
Cost 1000 Gallon1 Sa"d $0 .00
Gen,ro/ E110/uotlon of Pol/cl•• that Encourage Wot,r Savings
Th, City would lib to wvoluor, po/JcWs rhor would 1ncourag1 Municipal wot., iov/niJ.
P11nnln1Pertodl,_ __ ~lO=ll~••-lO~ll~-~
y,.,i~ll'I Pl.11nn ln1 P«iod~----"',n"----.....
Propam lenath 10 ';'HI~
Estimated Wair, Sa\li119s
Annual htim1ted Saving~ Ratel,__...;c"'. 5%=---'
($tlfffllttt
AvPtllf W.11er U1e Ann11olr.\'ott1
MG sownr;s
(u$lomcr C..ne10,y go/loris/ft
Municipal 7 35,i74.ll
r,tlmat•d Annual Water S1v!np _!.:!!!.-::,_MG/yr
fnlmatN s,vr,.., ovtr PltMII\I Ptrlod 0.367 MG
Costs
Total catt to Water Provider
OM Tiffll llbor Ind Mlterlll Coltl
one nme M1terl1ts Co~,1-----"-·ooai
One Tlrnt Slaff Coiu,_ __ _,Sc.c.7SQ=00=,
Ol'lo T,mo Labo r/M11totlll Cost ___ ...;S.a7.a;SC.a:00:a.
Hurn.
Th/J mto.sure aH«ts ON'! rhe Municipal
car~o,y. AtWffll'O r.Mll'tv/Jl'fvl'
1ttd&1elloo 11/ 0.1.S~ of p1o}ctltd onnw,1
WOttrUUI'
f srlmottrl onit llmr sraJI rosr1 /0t Stoff to
1pt11doppr01tlmo1ffy JS ttoun at
SSO~our to 1YO!uor, cu,,.,., policits
w/fhlnllttCJry.
Estlmottd Annual Cost S0.00/velf
lltlmlted Tel11 c.ost onr ,tannl .. Period lndlHliftt Set11p __ ..... $7~SO ... OC ....
Cost p.,. 1000 GafloM S.Ved $US
•
•
•
•
Water Waste Ordinance -Ex/sling Measure
Plannina P11toc1L! ----'20=1lc,I0:..:,20::;22,_ __ ___,
YHrsln Pl.lnnl""Pmod _____ .:;10:.,... ___ _
Pu,a,am L,"a,h,_ ____ ..:.... ____ _,vt1u,
Estimar,a Wattr Sa11lnp1
AMuill htimilttd Sav ina, R1tel1., _ _,o,.,.2.,s":....--'
Averl&t AMUII lstlmor~d Ann11ot
Worrr Sovlng,1 W1te1 UM! (MC/y1 J MG/rt Cu"omer C.1,1ory
S1n15e -hmll~ 640 l.6
MulU•Flml~ 371 0 .9
Commercial 311 a.a
lnd1.1lri1t 1S6 O.•
Nan,Mi,1r.rl!d Cu,tnml!r1of;,O ratl!tot!P\) 593 u
fStlmawd Annual Water Savin11 __ ...:,. __ MG/yr
lsOm11edS1vlnpowrPt■nnl,.Perlod S) MG
Costs
Total Cost 10 w11e, Psovider
Waffr~'"
One nme Labor Ind MltWI Cotti
Otle Time Stiff LlborCostsl---'s"'soo""",~"'
Ont 11me Matert.l Cosb,L. ----'$0""".~"'
One Time Ubor/M11erl,1 I Cosl ___ _.$500=•'°'00
lost Ftt f0t Fir,t 400.00090l/ons
NO!~S:
rPtfs mtoutt r,ff«IJ ofl cusromtr
cottgotlts Wltl'I tht t:.ctptlon of tflt
Munlclpolcatrgor;,.
£Jtimo1td on■,,,,., 11011 C'OSU/OI Stoff 10
SMndc~lrnott~JOhovnot
SSO.m/}lour to noltiott Cllfrtnt polici#!s
wlrhlnlt11Cif')'.
Nnt'1 '
The on ~ual ,~'lenu~ f@ wv.s e.sUmo1td
bo~d.,,nm~tln·t iry,ow.s/or ol/Clr,
CUffor,,#f'I
EsomottdR~tnutouumts Illar rht °'""'' rorrs will not thOftf' Otltf th,
plonnl11gp,rtod.
hlim~led A1tP,fll &e Annu,d A"'en11P wilhnul W.llflr ~lltnl\ S6,CJ27 .1211 80 /yHt
hlimilll'd A'ttfill•AMuill Rtvenu, with Watt, ~vinp S6.900,110 CJII /year
btl1NttdAMU.IRtvet1ueloM Re141tedto WatarS..vlnp $11,111.U. /vtar
ttdm•lffAnn...ttott $J1,JJ7.IZ /year
ls\. Cott ovtr Pl•MIAf "•riod f\Ol lndudln1 &6:»SI Rewnut ssoo.oo
Ell. (OU ov., Pli1Mln1 P1riod lncludi"I Set-up Ind lOlt Rtvtnut un,,11 . .u
Cost"' 1000 Gallons Slvtf U .JO
Wore, Rare Structure Changes
Besed on many war• consen,auon 1tudiea, an tnclifllno Olock werer 18te dellflrl mo. efrectNtly anmureges ,trk:Jent w.1er use. A
rate $/Udy may be noceu.,y to ena,,,,e m111tlmum MOiar oontotVOtlon llt'Mf•
Plannl•K Plttlod ._l --~•~o~••~•o~zo~•~z ---~
Yeiif~ In Pl ,nnlnt Perkxi...-_____ 10;..... ___ ~
Progrem lrl'lllh~-----•o ____ ~
Estimot~d Wat~ Sa\llngs
AnnualE\limatr.dS1vlnas A11eC:iii..._J
WaletUlt EuimottdAnn110I
MG/'Vf
Wolff 5ovlnp
Cu,tomu Qt ego" M<W -Si111d••F•mW 640 13
Mu ltl•Femily 371 I
I Commercial u, ' I lndustrbl IS6 I
htlmated Nlnual wa,., 5.avlnll __ -'!IO"'-__ MG/vr
f11Irnated Savlnp awr Plannln1 Period 30Z MG
Costs
Notes :
Auumt o conurvot~ rtduct,on ol 1"
o/ (>t'Oj t<Ccd total t,,?ftd .. :ikr. Rou
chonot Jtudlts ltaw Slk'lwr,. ,,~ rm·,
urn'r.f1S tSmdfnwst Flor'd., ->l1•'1f
M.J-.,~;1t,,;n.sw •utld'JI · f lf'•
This mttsurt dON l'O• tt/fM r ,•n.
fflflfl«/CUJfanrr,
Total Cast ta Water Provider Notts:
On. Timt Clly 5111ft Lllhn Sl0,000 .00
Ra1eS1u<h-performed by Consultfllts S30,om.oo
One lime Ubor/Mattrtal Coit $40,000.00
Rate Clteso,y
tabor costs Ind UM rsrlmattd !ifOJI ltmt
Jo, rtJtartltlttQ war« ,ott c,ptlo,u ond
imtt/rmt!nltng t~ options t--lOOhO!ltJ 01
$.SDlhw,}.
Cc»U oho Cnl.luut wottr rott stu~
compltrHlbt'oConwltont. Btfo,,.011~
rort strUCtllt? /J octo,J~. 0 fOlt )Wd)i
WVJld Md 10 M co,nolerrd by Oft outs!tk
cotUUttlng/ftm.
"'' annual ,rwtn~ Ion ..-cu ntlmotf!d
bold on tu"ttit nnn for ofl Town
cuSlomos.
CStimornl Rcwnw aJ..IUffl(!S Mot the
cutrtnr rores win ttot chot'tQt C'/lltt tlll
plan11/11gpe1/od.
fS tlffillrd Avtr;ace Anni.Il l Re¥anue WUhOul Wat er ~np $4,.97S,J29.1 1 /yHI
bthnattd Averqe Annual Rtvenue wil" water SIYinp $4,61S,724 .60 tveor
Annu.l Revcttuo Lou Rti.1ed to Wale, s.wtnp $H,SGe .5-I /ye~
rulm111td A11nu1I Cott S9t,SOUI /year
t,tJmaled 'Jlt owr P11mln1 Period not lndutt,111 LOSt llevenut S,O,D00,00
t:stlrn11ted Total Co~ OVl!r Pl1nnln1 Pe,IDd lndudlll.l Sit-up Hd lost
lltvtnut $S ,OH,04SA4
Cesl pre, 1000 GaUcuu, Sawed $U2
•
•
•
•
•
Educational Kits
S,lf-guided ,.tidenflal 8ffieatloMI kits can M ~signed to lnrJu~ 118'"5 SIICh f'$ IRAk tilfftCtlan tltltels, ltlMtyS, and water savi~
hrtu,as lnJ/nJclJona lot conduclln,g the audit and fW8ltlat,tg ll» reus can give rtsldantl1I customer, Insight ~ direction o, how
,~~r can..,,. water ""'1 ..,..r. TIit ~ olltna In lht In-ion, could lfld ltlt c-,_1o /alto pe,t lnoltltrcon..,..,ton
pmgrams offered,
Pfa nnin 1 Period! 2013 10 :.or ___ _,
VHO In Pl1nni:ig Ptriod,-----~"--------,
Prc,w~ltngth._ ____ .:,;IO _____ __,
E1tfmattd Water Savinq.,
Annual t1tim;11ed ~'"inp R,tfll 200!1
WaierUst Annual PtCKt"affi
ElllrMlfd Annuill W.i1~1 So1;.ing~ (1allon~/y1) (plon1/IO,) Partkil)ints
Sln1le-Famlt 71,204 750 1,173,064
Mt.JU -Fam,~ 404,US!J 2>0 2,0.Z0.276
(ntfflatld Annual Wattr Slvlnp 3.2 MG/yr
£1tlmllt1d Safflls over Plannln1 Pe:iod---,,.---.. --MG
NOffJ :
Htrmotto Sorinos rw,, Planning Ptrlod is calcula!td b,-coml)OUndir.o rht tstl,natrd anfluol M-·attt H~lros tH!' tht tafal numb tr of
;x,n,cipor:tf /of toch 9Nfn reor. f1 rlma ted Wottr Us~is bostd c:n tltt following 200S ·2011 avua&e:
Slngle Farnlly • 0.24 If/lap Potable Muh.l-f;imUy s 1 24 If/tap
Cosu
Total Con lo Wat• Pro11ilttr
LlbotCOlb
511ft Hou ri IWebwle 1.pd1te~, etc ,11-----"I·.
HawlyC°"tl-----"=.ar ··-
i.~•~:::Jft ;;::;:~:::1----,.--,-,i
OneMat~:=~bor _ --~=
&ie time M11tnifs Eosc (lull fu!ctli!Jt of i6l65
Audit kits) $51.toO.OO
Watllrlalel
Cumnt Ratel/,_.
Bow Ftt Jar F"ttsr 400,000 9al/OIU
0,1lint f,utrt1ctlon can bi! set up o,, Clry
WebJJtt.
Rrsldnllfalwiall"fCMlr.tvation •·,fucaUonal
Alts art tNO/loblf at wflo!tso~rs llit AM
Cot1.sttWCJon Group, Inc. for SS.99t)t'f unit
for o butt pure hast of 10000 un/u. Kits con
M cuJtrmittd to include tht Engltwood's .....
""'"' f'ht onnwf rntru,t loJt WffS Mllmnt"'
bo,l"don !unMttGtb/Of o#Town
customtt).
fu/mutt!d,1~11ueo!Uc;mn thot tht!
cuttefll 1111rs wil not chon9t rwrr thll!
plann.nfpc,iod.
hlim;itfd I.Vt'~!! Annl,l.ll Rrwnue wi1hovt W1t1r ~vffl8S $1 ,U9,0S9.tl /~.Jf
htlmlltd Average Annual Rt~e nue wl1h W■ttr S.ving, $1,097,S(;2,!i2 /vr■r
Allnull Revenue I.OH Relattd to WIier S.vln11 Sl1,'91,zt /rt!••
tstlruttd Annull Cost SU,417.21 /vear
Estlffllttd Cost owr Pllnnlne Pertad not fMludl ... Lo1t Rew.nu• SSl,t00.00
£stlmlltd Total COit over l'tannln1 Pertod tncludln1 Stt•up and lost
Revenue $174,871.91
Colt per 1000 G1tl0fll Saved $1 .57
Public EdllCIJtlon · bill stuffers and w,:b$/ti,
Watat p,olllders m"y l»(iodlct,Jy ptOtlfde cusfOmtt,, with walflr CMW\oation tip$ in w• ,,;,s on tMlr Wltb!Ue, ltM At ht mnf dfl,. ol IINkollce.
Pl.inn~,. ~nod._l __ --'2,.0.,n"to=-'2==•=22'-_7___,
Veusht Pt1nn1tt1Perlod.~----=IO'-----,
Ptoll'lmL1nath.._ ____ l,:O--'----'
Estimotrd Watrr Savl11gs
Annual h tlmiltt'd Sil~fflS lla1eJ.__-'1C::.0011;:;.:;.. _ _,
..... ,
r1Umot«I UNlng /Jr btlJ sttJff•rs and
!WDJ1C~fcAlcat1C111SJ1'. .--·----------.... -----,--,,.,., .. ,.,,.,.,,.,,.,...,
ANtunl Wot,.,
LOSrt
SII\Ml!hml
Multl-Filml'
Com:mttl,tl
MO ...,
m
m
S:Mll{II
IAG/rr
).I
l.•
htln1Mtd AmnHIWJC..-Swlnp __ =U~.•~_MG/~
llthnated 511,'fflll owir Pia.Mina Period U& MCi
Total COIi 10 Wei« Provtd&r
LMOl'Co1t1
St•lf ~Uufl f----,--OO"\!t,11 .11
Ho urty Ca,t. $50,00l/hour
AnnuML.abor
Mlttrtats Coats
$0.15 participant
Numbtrof P.trtidp,anu~--,,-"•0=2~:-"
Arl111J1I MHena11 __ ~S~7,7~H.50~/yrt1r
(per 1000 Uons)
ftt Jo, first «JO,Q~gallons
MJtts:
Staff h'Jllri Inc~ rlmt' 1prnt 1HrporJm,1
nn1 ,11'ff1ttln{J w,IH/t!', nnr! ,-,.,itttlnQ Ml
w,;fJt,s .
Aw,oge-JO,Ul rw Q("C(l1,t,1b
1htAWWA has 1:111.rll/fenft'Ollabk/ot
OU'Cltost. AiltfOl/t co.st Ptf bl# stuf/Pr
10fl9Nlfrom$0.SO to $0.15~1tem.
nit 01)' mo., olw purtftou W.,lng11ol MIi
sttfttrs and o/ftt ,u.JmOfl(ll ,nJormoflOn OIi
flwltlllWbsftr.
"'Orn :
1ht OMud "~""" IOU WDI emmoll'd
oowd o,. cu,r11,u tDtn /o, di row ,,
M """ffl
Enlm ortdRtWnut OSfUmtS ,t1or rrtf
cuurnl ,mn win not ct,ang, ~, ttw
pl.:ttnlng prtlud
tstlmatfd Averlflt Annu,I k~ue Without w,:tr SIWIIS s..,463,0]S.,ICJ /Vfl:
E,Uffllll~ A\Cftl&e Annwl ft~c:n1.e W1U'I w,ierS,vt,, 1i S4,411,~.0.!_/yt1:
latlmated AlwMlal tlevenue Loll ,telate4 to WM91' S.h:p $44,HO. ; /yta:
UllmllH AMu•I COit $St.J",8$ /yt,t
E.sUmatd Colt ov., Plaitnlng Period nol lndudinl Lost lt ..... nvct $91,S6S.00
R.,,.,nu"~~
Coat per 1000 G1llon1 S.'lad S,,Ol
•
•
•
•
•
Online Ac,ess to Wat~, 81/1 & History
/lfglM/llg In 2013, Eog-wl/1 be 1"'8 to &How CUllomtrl fl> a«ff•, ,_ WIIW bin Nstory
Plannln1 Period) 20 B 10 20Z~ __)
VHrs In Plannina Peslod 10
Pto1ramlen11hc= ----'l:.:O ____ :]-;ears
Estlmotrd Wott r Savings
AnnUII Eit lmated Savln1s Rate._! --'-1. .. 01< _____ ...,
listlmstHMnUC"I A\lfr.t1e water Use w Sa 1
Cust:.mer catqor, MG I or:;G,;. ngs ·-Sln•~Faml~ 640 6.4
Multi-Fa mil, l7A 3.A
Conwnl!tdol llA l .4
Industrial 156 1,6
lstlm1ttdAnnu1IWate,S.W111 __ ~l~S-~1 __ MG/yr
[stlml\td Savinp,ovtr Pl1nnln1 Period tsl MG
Costs
Total Cost lo Wiler Provider
LlbotCoslS
StattHounl
HourtvCo st _
Annuallibor
--Com
01/year
SS0.00,1,our
SO.DO /veil
Unit Cost ~----'$0=.00;ail/pirtldpant
Number of Pirt 1cipints O /vear
Annual ~erlah $0.00 /V'ar
runenl llltM/Feet
Saw ftt for lint f00,000 pollons 53.19
Nnrn·
rhls tr.taS.Jrr WGJ anol111td for me rt red
custommonly.
NottJ.'
Tht omuol rntnve lou wos tstimoterd
flult'cJ (Jl1 t,1Ut'IIIIUft')(O, ol/Tuw11
custom,n.
fstfmOfn/ "rvmut ouumt" fllal flit
:uucni ,airs will"°' thangr O'tltt Otr
pJannl11g Pftiod,
Estimated A11er•ae Annual ftever,ue wilhoul W•ter sav1n1s S4,9/~,229, 18 tvear
Utlnwted A11er• IU'lnual Mevenue •i1h Water s.Jvln,s S4,92S,'76.89 /year
bthmtalllf AM"'I ltevenw• I.on lleS.lltd to WIie( S.vtnp ~J.!!!:!!_ /vt!iJI
btlmated AnnUIII Coit $41,152.29 /yHr
hllmatad Cast aw, ,t1nnlnc Period not tnckullnc 1.ott Rwenu• $0.00
lt1hnatftl Totat Cott avt, Plannlnc Period lncludlna Stt•u p and Lo11
Revenue S..17 ,S:Z.Z.92
._ _________ .;C.=••.:;"";:;.;'000=.;;;Ga:;;;f~Sl•od SJ.Z9
Post or Distribute ET '"lgatlan Sthedul/ng
ET /mgllion sc"-dulf,s uling hilfoncal •-• ol Wfalhar <11111 cen bo Pflp,nd by tho Qty priot to lht inlgl/f4n ,,.son .,,d _,OU/to-~··-Cl/tflOlilS lo ,.,.,.,. •• ""'" l)IOIT8IMling /Mk /nigalion s11111ms. -.i CotJtlldo W8lfl'
Conaerv.,ncy Oislrict ha, tools on the~ wobolte /Mt can .,Id wttll lhi1 c•k;ulalfon. The 1chodulo could be printed on tho blll o,
IJOllad on tn• Wfb at th• l><IOfnnlno o, ,., tne dUIOtion of the imgat,on seaaon.
l:stimatld Wot~r savlnqs
Annual hllmilltc Sav1nR1, R1tel._ _ _.1."'°""'--.J
fstfmoted
Avt••ae Outdoo, Atuu,o / Wotrr
Water Ust MG Sovinos
Custome, Category MG/'lr
Sin1l~F11m1r., :uo 3.l
Multl •Famltv 189 1.9
Com"""°at 169 ~ 1.7
Estimated Annual Wlltr Slvl,ws ___ 6~·• ___ plloM/fr
l!stlmatK S1vln11 ...,., PillMln1 Period 61 pllOn)
Costs
Norts :
Thi• mtou:rt affttrs pro}tct~d outdoot
wo re, uw5c for thf cu,romr, cottGor/rJ ,,._,
Euur.or, that opprtXlmot,lv sG• of un Is
ustd ourdoots.
Total Co,t to W■ter Pravfdar
Llbortosb
StaffHoun~------=t'l/yHr
Hou,ty Cost . $50.00_/hOur
Annual Labor $«)0.00 /year
MolwtlhCosb
Unll C.On (COit ot 8111Stuttfrs) I----S::aD:::,75.ai/outk:tpinl
Number of l'1n1apanu 10,14l /ytar
Annual Matcrl•h• $7,151.50 /ye~,
C111ren1 lltlilll/Flft
SU9
NoteJ:
Stoff houu intludt Cmr s,ml pnpotlttfl
st:lttdul~. Snid out o Khttwr c.,r dmr
~ 1tor, Ont lime cosu lncludt swd-Jlt
f)f'00tt1m .~t up
Av«Off 10,34 1 top OCC'OUlltl
Norn:
Tht on11uo/ ,~!Jt loss wo.s nr,mottd
bawdoncurrttttrat~[CK Of/Town
c1.utomr,).
FUimorffl Rrvmur au11mts that the
c11tfrn1 rora will not dto119t a,tr r~
plonnin9 p~lod.
F,tlimlf"fl AVfl"IIP AMUal IPVttneH' wil hnul W1tlH S~vlnt'-Sl,2.11 .511.10 /Yor
E,timated Avetit&f A.,nual Rtvtnut wi1h Willet SavlnlU S2,209,lOl.Sl /vur
£n1m1ted Annual Aevtnut Loss ltlntd to w~:e, sav1n,s su,us.11 /'fV•'
bUmiltd An"ual Colt $J0,4 Jl,N /v_.,
[Jtlmattd Cost Ovtr Planning Period not lncludl"f Lost Re,,C!,,UC $81,565.00
lStlmotad fotal Cost ovtt PIIMl'"4 Ptrtod lrcludln1 Set-up arid Lost
flfttnue UCM,711.11
COit per 1000 Ganon1 51vtd $4.49 •
•
•
•
School Educat ion Proorom • EK/sting
Each year . En.;lewood host, school children at lhe water rvatment pla'1t to, water day.
Plan11in1P1rtodi~ ---~!O"'l3'-1-'0~2~02"'2 __ ~
Ye;m,ln Pl1nnln5Perlodr----~'~o ____ .,
Program lensth 10 vem
CJtlmated Wat~, Savinq.s
fstimorto
Average Wiler U~II! Anni.of Walt'I
MG Savings
Cu1IQmtrC1t1go..., MG/yr
Sinlde•F1mll 640 3.1
Multl·FamU-; 189 0 .9
Utimated Annual Wa ter S.v1n11 ___ ,_.1 ___ 1allon\/yr
Estimated s1111n11 over Pl1nn1n1 Period 41 .S gallon\
Costs
Total Cost to Water Provider
Water R,111
Labor Cotts
SttffHouul
HourtyCo,1_
Annual labnr _._
Mat•lllsCCKtl
16,/year
$50.00 /ho"'
$I00.00/'fl',11 f
Annu~ M:1ter l:1l 18ud,rtj Ssoo)/VP.ilr
Annual Material~ __ . $500.00 /year
OaJe Fee for rlur 400,000 gallon, SJ .2~
NOCt'S."
This rnt'oJure only off,:=o Sin gle·Faml/y
en d Munl-Fomlly n,ett¥t!d wotr, umg'-
Anumr0.2S" sovln gs of projrcttd wow
11sng,:.
Note~:
Sralf ham 111t/11rl~ rim, P,f'pnrl"fJ /tr ond
portici patmq in war tr day (J6 hour5}.
Moceriol com iffCludt an annual budQt,t
fo r t'du,allon multtlul) t.1J1b .
'1te anr.uolrl'Vtnut Ion wo• p-stimorl'd
baudartCIJl~ntrottJ/or all Town
customtts.
lctimnr'11 Rrvt'nu,.auum~ rhar thr
currtnl 1ottJ will not chottge over thr
plannln; r,trlod.
Eslim:iled Average Annua l ACYCn llC without W.llCI Sa'oltn p $621,873.l l /yu,
Cstimattd Avet.>&e l\nnu.>l AttYen11e with Wate, S1vin9, $608,HS.OS /v-ar
Annwl Rev...,• Lou RelllH to Walef Savini' $1J,Hl.l5 /yur
EstlmatH Annual Cott $14,931.15 /yur
Estimated Cost OYlr P11nnlns Period not lncludlnt loll Atv•nu• $1),000.00
htlmllrd Tolll Cott OYl!I Plennln& Per iod lntludln& Se t-up ,nd UHi
•~•nue Stff,311 .W
C01t p,r 1000 G11lons Saved U .60
Ru/dent/al Wator Audits
The City envillons a ra5Jdontlal audll program In wllich bca/ plurr.:»rs may be utHll.9d IO r,«torm water audirs for cuslomor.s.
r1,nn n1 Pe,l odl,_ __ ..:;lll:,:1:..ll;;o.:.20:.:>:..> ___ _,
Ye~rs in ~,nn,n1P~lod ____ __,1,_o ___ _
Pr ograrn~nrih ____ ....:l:..O ____ _
Estimated Ware, Savings
Annual E~iffiit4!d Au lclttnti~I Water us~Ptf T•pwttnoot Sa\in 1,
~inglt•tilm ly 71i.ZO4 1a11ons/tap
Mut1i •farnly __ •0<~,0!._,_~1•llon s/t1p
Total ,11J 259 QIII 0"\/llp
A1111J•I f ~tlmntd 1'11nlden11a l Wiltcr U5~ P,:r r ,pwlt,, ~'llnp
Costs
Slnglt'Jam•lyl ?S,~8
Mu11 1-r11m Iv. ~q1,1rw
[Slilftltad AMUII Wlte, SlvlfllS 1.7
1
11Uonsitap
gaH nM /tlll'I
RilllOn\/yt
bt1m,tlldS1vl1111un1 l'l•nnlr'9 Pc1 1od __ .,_141~--••llon ,
Total Cost to Wale, Provldtr
LlborCosb
Stitt ttou11tWtbu11 upd11u, ttc.},_ ___ ~20"'</y..a,
W1ter Rlttt (1011)
H0t.rlyC01t
Annual Labor
$SO.OO/tiour
S1.000.lll/\1m
UnU Co st l1---~50~.oo..,~p,1rtkl11111u
Number ot Piinlclp.lnts tl6VV.ar
Annua l Malett•b SO.Cl! /ye~r
$).29
f,'o lts :
C11fmoted water use is be std on the
followl111200S -20J 1 ;,vena,:
Sin1teFarnlly •0.2 4al/tapFotableMulti-
~,mlly a J.l4al/up
nr1moI,.,11o,,,,.;n11. JM,nf,~1rl~nfiol
111.l .Jvn:i (Maf lviJ) u~ 9,29.f l11p~J wUI
11,w pcrtlciOOttdfapproi J860
fa(ficl pa11uJ. Au:.ime o,11,u11I particlp,fia:,
of tali and 11' SO'll,tqS oJ Ollt'fO(.. •
r»uwhotdus..
CUlmatM Sm.tnos owr Pio Mitt' Pfrlod If
u11t11tu1nt t;y u,H1JiK1u11tfin11 tlw n/imulrll
o.,nvalwottr sovlttgs ;>tr /he tolol numbt1
of 0111111 rnrtlelponu/ort«tt f~n ytor.
Ult CIIY me,, fltlp pur plumbt!S in towh
'-'otn 1
rPlf'MnunlrNtttu~kmWt' f'Sllmnrtrl
buwda11c1111tfll 1111eJ {a, ull ru ... 11
C.tS~
f.Jr,rnoftd ~MrtW ouume, thot lht
rurr,,u retn t11JI ,,at rM"f' a~ the
plO!lfllnql)MOO.
h llrnatf'd A'ltUKt Annual fl t llf'lue WllflOUI Wii ltr SJ.Vino S482,l59.41 lttJI
Ett1ma1ed A'ft 'alt Annual Revenuewltl'I W1tersavtno $480,812 .70 lieu
Mnu,1 Rnenue LOH fltlolHl!CI to Wtttr ~•vtnp $1,446,18 t,tir
f.ltlnutadAMw.tlCmt U .446.11 lt"U
(Sllfflltld con owr Pl1Mln1 Pertod IIOt lndt.&dl,. LOil Revenue siu.000.00
hllm1ted Tott I C111t ovtr Plan11in1 Ptrlod l11¢hldi"1 SeH1p and Lolt
Rltvanue su.,u.11
Coit per IOOOGtlklru Saved $0.U
•
•
•
•
•
Comm~rc/al and Industrial Wattr Audlh
Commereial and l11Custrlal cut101Mrs are olt,n the hVhest wat,r users end have beon an a11a o/ lncre1sklgi focus for wa,er
conservation. eomm,,e1111 and Industrial cu,t~r, wtto pttrticipala in a water atd,t COUid ICltnr,ty "'"YI to l'IOI.ICO Ute,r 0/Wfa!,ng cosu
OYlr the iOng term We, aud,ls can oe ~rl0t"'-" /:ly II third ,,.,-ty con.uifr,nt and i$ 1n •ffect;ve way to educe le b11Jiflflsses on how
/hey can saw water.
Pl.tnnln1P1ul()d,_1 __ _,_10::.;1a:.>•:a•..:;70;a>a..> ____ _.
'f'Hnln PIMlllnRPIII00 _____ ..:;10'-------
Progwn l tnJ'h _____ -'IO'------
Eitimatttl Wat,r SovinV
hrim1t-«IAn1malW•••• Savine, t .A 1.1rrn n,Jy r
tnlmltad Sevlnat,Ovtt' Plan111n1P•rlod __ ,. ___ ullon,
Notes .
[slimortd worr r Utt ,s t rJJt,1 on o J.Ol AF/t,p Ille fo r Commt't<,al raps ond JJ.S111,r/rop ltt1vWial rap 1, TM, It tftr011e109, .op usr fo,
.i0061hrougolJlOJJ .
Es1111101td Savi~i ou!I Plon nhlg ~11od i ; caiculotHJ bl' (t11npoi.r.d1nq rh, es1imo~dontt1JOlwottr savings Ptr IM 101(11 numbtr o/ o\ldlr
po1tl:ipo"'sfo1 eo<hgf11tn )ltOt. '"''"""'~· "' fht/rmvtcro/rheproqrorr,, ,,-,,or, 10porrldpants. In tMstcO#tdy,a, oft~ ""'9 ,,1m ,
thtrt o,t wo t tr 1avu1g,s /1orn lht IU por1 ic,oonu /rom loit )'\'Or 't pr09ror.i, olld MW partic,pGnu thtrtoyco11100Utld1r,o ,,.., sovin91 .
Com
Total Co'lt to W1ter Prov4dtr
laborCnu
BaW" ICI' Jo, 1,1ft 400,000fOllons
St.1ffHou1~1
HOU/lyCon,
ArrualUbor
81/vur
~0.00 !hour
$400.00 /vtar
n .111
Norn :
Stoff houri lnciude tltnt' /Of c001dmorkm
wlfh Utirdpo,ty con1ulranu.
CcnsulronlJ mav br hltftl ro ~,form cudia
at on o~IIJIJt COSI of opp,o.umotttv
$500.00 Ptt oud,r.
Note1 :
1heanm>i,/ttvtn11tlou...a1r,rirnatrt:
bi1S1dot1 rutttnt ,or,, /or all town
,inromtn.
tHlrnatctR~tnucossu~s that 1ht
tufltnt rctts MIi not chono<' avitr tilt'
p:OnnlnggtrlOd.
htlm•ted AYr.111, An'lU il l 11, ... enuc wilhOUI WIIIH S,,i'lifl~-~S•-"~·•-•s_.,_s __ ,,..,
Est,mat td AYtrac• Annual Revtnut wl:h Water S.Yinli Sl64,6S ... o, fv.ar
Ann:.,.I111wnut Lou llei.tH lo W111 1 :wi .... np S,U,111 .11 fyeJ r
hOm1tedAnt1~CD'll_~I_JJ~Al~l~,l~I __ /yeu
lttlntlltd Cost ottr Pfannln.. Ptriod not lndudh,Losl Rtvtnue _ _,,cll~OO,,,.ooo=.oo"'--_
h\lmtttcl Tot.I Cost O'ftf Plannlna Period lnc:Ndin1 kl•upand Lost
Rtvtnue_...;::IZ::;lOa,.1:.11:::.lt::...._
Co1t pe1 l(ICIOGaltom Sa'Hd SUO
• Legal :;,,;c,rado Communily Media . '
Pu blication .. ,
I 303-566 4100
Co1ort.ci!) 91]7'.) q,:rc :n~B!~d-~~ ... 1 1:,
Invoice (:u!9\"Til1~;ty ~
·,,1 •• c.;;, H1<:~h Nt ~ Rdr,(I (""'::, 119
URl. www ourcoloradonews com
C,uhy Burr.-.gc Ar.Cl . r,· 00029•·•8
City of Cnglewoc,d Ul1hlies Oep11r1men1· • PtlOne; u 1 C-00 E 1iyh.:wuud Pkwy .
Engl ewoOd . CO 80 110 ?0s1 Dale · 0412712013
Duo Oa ie: 0::,,21 •201:.
'-
lA~-# . -------
Due) Text Start Slor, Ins. Amounl Prepaid
ouo:1195~ No 4211 WArtl-< oamnon 0412012013 2060 0 00 20 BU
•
Pavment Terms Ne1 JO • Afh1Jav1ts ·11111 IJe scm upon rece 1p1 ol pay,m:111 . Tolal Due 20.80
FIDAVI 0
PUBLICATIO N
•
•
•
APPENDIXC • Public Comments and Response
2013 ENGLEWOOD WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
COMMENTS AND RESPONSES
The City of Englewood has ·completed its 60-day public review period for the
Water Conservation Plan that began on May 1, 2013 through July 1, 20 13. Official
notification was posted In the Englewood Heralr rcopy anached). A complete copy of
the Plan was available at Englewood Civic Center and on the City's website . During the
public-review period, the City received eight comments on the Plan .
Complete cop ies of the public comments are found at the end of th is Appendix . The
following is a summary of the core issues conveyed in the public comments, and
Englewood 's response.
Xerlacape Programs and Me11unt11
•
A couple of comments requested the incorporation of Xeriscape programs and
incentives . The City did consider Xeriscape programs during the initial screening of
potential conservation measures and programs . Based on the City's screening criteria
(1 . staff time, 2. financial implications and 3 . political ramificat,ons), the City does not •
currently have the staff resources to Implement Xeriscape programs and did not feel the
programs me ·;ted putting money Into ii. The City will re-evaluate Xerlscape measures
and programs with future water conservation plann ing efforts . Englewood residents are
encouraged to utilize Xeriscape landscape.
Turf and Landscape Restrlcti0118/Standard1 for New Construction
One comment requested !~,at Englewood limit the amount of grass for new homes and
businesses and require the use of low water us11ge grasses . Englewood staff
considered turf and landscape restrictions/standards for new construction . Based on
the City's screening criteria (1 staff lime , 2. financial implications and 3. political
ramifications), th·e City decided to re-evaluate new oonstructlons restrictions and
standards with fuhire waler conservation planning effons.
Ma11datl•ry Watering Schedule
A reside, :t requested that Englewood go to a mandalory three-day-a-week watering
schedule o:i a permanent basis. While this may be necessary during a waler shortage
or drought, the City felt that a mandatory three-day-a-week watering schedule is not
necessary to reach Its water conservation goa ls.
WatarRates
There were several commenls provided regarding waler rates . One comment
suggested that the City should use a base rate which accounts for lhe cost of the
system operations, plus a reasonable amount of Na te r for household use and •
•
•
•
landscaping; (with an allowance for trees and gardens ) and then have a surcharge for
excessive use, and an even higher rate for usage that Is clearly wasteful or abusive.
lncorporaled into the Conservation Plan is a water rate study. The study will consider
all of the elements of this comment and determine if any changes need to be made :'l
Englewood's current water rate structure .
One resident war-concerned that the City Code regarding the conversion of nat-rate
cuslomers to metered custon1ers was changing to require flat-rate customers to install
meters . The City Code is not changing. The Englewood Meter Replacement Program
(EMAP) discussed in the Plan is voluntary . EMAP takes the difference between what
the customer pays for the non-metered rate and what the customer would pay for the
metr-red rate and uses that money to help pay the cost of installing the water meter. II
p rovided a grant by the CWCB , Englewood would like to expand upon their current
program by providing 50 to 100 meters at no cost to the customer whi le the customer
continues to pay the flat rate charges, as further Incentive for meter replacement . If the
customer converts , the money received i>Y the City wou ld go to providing a meter for
another flat ra te customer.
The City would like to respond to an inaccuracy regarding Englewood's water rates as
compared lo Denver's water rates . The comment states that Denver rates are
$2.59/1000 gallons plus $6.33 admln fee ; Englewood 's rate is $3.29/1000 gallons plus a
$9.71 admin fee . According to the resident. if you use 10,000 gaRons in a billing period
you pay $4 .26/1000 gallons in Englewood , vs $3 22/1000 gallons in Denver. However,
the calculation did not consider that Denver Water bills monthly while Englewood bills
on a quarterly basis . If we examine a scenario in which one uses 10,000 gallons per
month for a three-month period , an Englewood resident would pay $3.6111 ,000 gallons
as compared lo $3.22/1 ,000 gallons in Denver.
A comment was made regarding the fact that Englewood's current rate structure
charges less per 1,000 gallons for water consumption over 400,000 gallons . The
current rate structure is an incentive for industry and large water users and ii is unlikely
that residents will reach Iha 400,000 gallon threshold. As mentioned previously, a water
rate study will evaluate the current water rates and determine if any changes need to be
made to Englewood's current water rate structure.
Rainwater Harvesting and Graywater R1 ,uae
There were a couple of comments made regarding rainwater harvesting and
incorporating the practice into this Plan. Capturing rainwater is an ongoing issue in
Colorado, and ii is not allowed if ii will injure vested waler rights . For the most part,
Colorado law does not allow homeowner to collect or use ra inwater runoff from roof
unless their only source of water is a well on the property.
In 2009, however, the Colorado State Legis lature passed two laws tha t carve out
exemptions from the general rule -The first law says that if you are not served by a
domestic wa ter system and you are lorated in a designated ground water basin or your
r:ollection system qualifies as exemp , from 37-92-602(1)(9)(1), you are allowed to
capture rainwater for household, lire protection, stock watering and Irrigation of up to
one acre of lawns and gardens as long as it is applied to uses specilied in the well
permit that applies to your property. The second law allo\YS the State to participate in a
study of 1 O new developments to determine the impact or capturing rainwater on
streams. rivers and tr;outary groundwater.
Additionally a couple of comments were made regarding graywater reuse. The term
"graywater" maans discharges from bathroom and laundry room sinks, bathtubs,
showers, laundry machines and other sources authorized by the Colorado Water
Quality Control Commission . In May 2013, the Colorado General Assembly passed
House Bill 1044, which authorized the use of gray,.vater . The majority of Englewood's
water rights do not allow ror reuse. particularly if that reuse involves further consumption
of the water.
Public Education
A couple of comments were provided regarding public education. Based on the City's
screening criteria ( 1. staff lime, 2. financial implications and 3. political ramifications),
:he City does not currently have the starr resources to devote to educational Classe~.
However, the Plan includes educational kits, public education through newsletler, bill
stutters and the City Website, onllne access to water bill and history and distribution of
ET irrigation scheduling in water bill . The City will re-evaluate educalior, measures and
programs with future water conservation planning efforts
•
City Building Fixtures •
A comment was made that every toilet that is in an Englewood controlled building
should be modified or replaced with lov: usage toilets. Currently, as new toilets and
fixtures are needed in City buildings, low water use fixture, 11re used as a replacement.
Comment 1; I strongly recommend that everyone involved with the ·vater consarvalion
plan be required to read 'Rainwater Harvesting for Dry/ends and Beyond Vol. 1-3" by
Brad Landcaster. I would also like to see the city use more xeriscaping around c11y
facililies. It's baffling why you have lawn around places like the WTP, city maintenance
facil/ty, Police station, etc. The only person who ever sets fool on those expanses of
grass ore the people who mow them, truly a waste of water and maintenance. Allow
and impl!lment the use of greywater. Give incentives /or ,cariscaping. Limit the amount
of grass ior new homes and businesses and require the use of low water usage
grasses. Go to a mandatory 3 day a week wi.terlng schedule all of the lime.
Comment 2· Water is the staff of 1/fe ..... we all know that We cannot do without it and
our quality of life, particularly here in the dry Western Desert, depends upon the
availability of good, clean water. I am sure that is why our civic leaders in Englewood
worked so hard lo obtain water rights for Englewood-lo insure that our quality of life
would remain high because we h .. d enough water. In the 1970 's, Englewood had a "flat
rala'' water bl/ling system. We paid in advance, and the city had a stable . absolu1.,Jy
predictable fund to pay 1/1111 cost of providing water. Our lawns and neighbor/Joocls were
green and inviting. The name ·Englewood" seemed to describe our green urban forest . •
..
•
•
•
Now we have water meters and we sell our "excess" water to more affluent
neighborhoods. The rationale for this was that by selling our excess water, Englewood
would have plenty and our rates would stay lower than surrounding ell/es.
Unfortunately, •·.,., hasn't worked out. Denver rates right now are $2.50/1000 gallons
plus $6.33 admin fee; Englewood's rate is $3.29/1000 gallons plus a $9. 71 admln fee . If
you use 10,000 gallons in II billing p11riod you pay $4.2611000 gallons in Englewood, vs
$3. 2V1000 gallons in Denver. As just a side note, if you are one of Englewood's "out of
city" metered customers, you only pay an admin fee of $9. 22. So much for the theory of
"sell off our water and pay less for the water we use."
Over the past several decades, as Englewood's water pol/cy has moved from a flat rate,
predictable cost to a metered cost, Englewood's neighborhoods have consistently
declined in appearance. Certainly a big part of that has been the /act that bluegrass
lawns are water guzzlers and have become very expensive to maintain under the
current water pricing system, and as you drive through the city you can see numerous
homes with dead or abandoned lawns, but also fewer gardens and more neglected
trees. No rational person is going lo suggest that we encourage bluegrass lawns, or
running water in the gutter. But our policies are not encouraging APPROPRIATE
WATER USE to Keep Englewood Beautiful. As the appearance of our neighborhoods
continues its decline , so does the desire to live here, raise a family, participate in civic
affairs, and so forth . Our water policies have contributed to this dee/Ina even though we
seem to have enough water to take a more enlightened approach, saving water
appropriately, but encouraging water use thet keeps Englewood an attractive, livable
city. It is vexing to me that Englewood 's neighborhoods can't afford the water that we
ere selling to other, more affluent metro neighborhoods to waste on THEIR lawns and
green space, which they seem to do with reckless abandon, even to the point, in
Highlands Rench, of penalizing homeowners who do not use enough water on their
lawns. Obviously, they have recognized that p~ple want to live and do business in a
city which has visually appealing trees, landscaping, and so forth . We apparently
haven 'I figured that out, even though we already have Iha water rttsources.
Obviously, the cost of water Is a much small part of a fam/1y·3 budget in a more affluent
community than it is in less affluent Eng/llwood. So / see nothing In the proposed Water
Conservation Plan lo encourage the APPROPR!A TE USE of Ille water Englewood
owns to improve the qualify of the appearance and livability of the City of Englewood,
taking into account that our cily is not as affluem as some o' our Southam neighbors.
For instance, Englewood's development guidelines require trees, and our Concrete
Replacement plan requires replacement trees when a tree is removed next to a
sidewalk . But our water conservation plan gives no thought to the cost or effort involved
in owning a tree , or the water required. Treas are an expensive addition to a
homeowner's landscape. They require watering, maintenance, insurance, trimming, and
probably eventual expensive removal. I guess a "conservation minded" citizen should
simply do without trees . But can you imagine Englewond without trees? Certainly the
"wood' part refers to our attractive urban forest. I irr,.,,gine lh6 growing number of
apartment dwellers in Englewood feel thiJt their water rate should be tower, after all they
don 'I have trees, or grass or gardens, or flowers to tend, water .ind maintain.
So it seem., to me that Englewood homeowners should not be disedvanteged when
compared 10 apartment dwellers, or to homeowners in more affluent areas to whom
Englewood sells water. Whtie a homeowner will probably use more water, much of that
will to enhance the urban landscape, providing trees and landscaping which enhances
all of our quality of life. There is clearly a benefit to the community provided by
homeowners who invest in trees and appropriate landscaping, and a weter conservation
program should recognize this benefit and encourage trees through water pricing. Tree
ownership shoold not be mandated by the City, and then immediately p1111alized by
Englewood 's water pricing policy. Similarly, soma thought should be given to the social
and community benefit provided by a homeowner who has a flower or vegetebte
garden, enhancing the beauty of the neighborhood and the livability of the urban
landscape. These gardens should be encourag11d, not penalized by waler pricing when
compared to the person who only plants a water guzzling bluegrass lawn. Again, isn't ii
curious that the Cily of Englewood is now subsidizi11g a commu11ity garden for pBoplB
(apartment dwellers) who cannot have their own garden, but gives no break to the
homeowner who owns, pays taxes on, and provides his own garden area . Additionally,
it Is curious that this •conservation Plan' doesnY seem lo encourage, or even to allow
some innovative conservation techniques, such as grey water systems, roin barrels, low
"ow toilets, and so forth . Grey water systems should be encouraged when eppropriately
designed and installed. There Is no good reason why bathing or hand washing water
cannot be used again for toilsr flushing before it passes back i11to the SB11ilary sewer
system. This does not affect the amount of water av11ilable for re-Introduction back Into
the river as treated efflu11nt, but will reduce the amount needed to operate a household.
Similarly, cisterns designed to catch and use rainwater for gardan or lawn, or household
use should be encouraged and allowed. It is curious that Englewood "claims " that runoff
rain water creates a storm drainage burden that must be remediated It.rough a tax, but
will not allow a homeowner to catch and use that rainwater. thereby eliminating this
storm drainage burden. Homeowners should be encouraged lo use low flow toilet.~. low
/low showerheads, drip irrigation for flowerbeds and gardens; if not through a rabata
program then at least through an education program, classes, product
recommendations, and so forth . Some considerable thought should be given lo the
problems faced by a family trying to plan a family budget and Iha affects of a constantly
changing water bill which seems lo be out of their control. A family should be able to
predict its wafer bill with some certainty, evan through periods of drought. I suggest that
the city should use a base rate which completely accounts for the cosr of the system
operations, plus a reasonable amount of water for household use and landscaping;
(with an allowance for trees and gardens, as mentioned earlier) and then have 11
surcharge for excossive uso, and an oven higher rota for usage that is clearly wasteful
or abusive. Under tr.is scenario, a family could reasonably plan and know its costs, and
would ba encouraged to not abuse or waste this water resource, but would be
encouraged to have trees, a garden, flowers and so forth . The rate paid by apartment
dwellers should take Into account that someone else, i.e. homeowners and the City
through its parks, is paying the cost of the landscaping amenities, trees. lawns, and so
forth which we all enjoy In tnis SUBURBAN environmenl In Summary, we all know that
waste is bad. Now we need to recognize that the quality of life in Eng/wood, in the
future, will be determined by how we allow and encourage appropriate use of Iha water
resources we own. and which we are constantly reminded that are more than adequate .
•
•
•
•
•
•
Our Conse,vation Plan should plan for not Just waler conse,vation, but should embrece
innovative water saving technologies to "stretch " the water we can use, and should
ENCOURAGE THE APPROPRIATE USE OF WATER, using our pricing mechanism to
insure that we have the kind of landscaping, trees, gardens, flowers and water efficient
landscaping that will "Keep Englewood Ber.utlful" and provide a high quality of life for
our residents and businesses.
Comment 3: Page ES-1 . Paragraph 3; table ES1 would seem to indicate that water
used should be 70.677 AF (or are you referring to a savings?). Page 12, reference to
fig 2.4; do we really charge less for more consumption? $2.04 for heavier users vs.
$3 . 29 for tighter users ... That would seem to discourage conse,vation. Page 1 ~.
reference to fig 2. 5 should be 2.6 (or vice versa).
Comment 4: Table 2.2. Where are the Rainfall numbers from? Englewood, Watershed
from where we gel our water. snowpack, does it exclude our snowfall, etc. ? .... I'd like
lo see a reference . Figure 2. 5. on Iha Y exis ii is really eesy to (mentally) put a comma
where there is a period in the Y values; I would recommend using the ,umber without
decimals (e .g. 1000) or with only one decimal (e .g. 1000.0) ..... or1ust use billion gallons
with one decimal. Pretty amazing how water use has gone down /3 billion to 2 billion)
.... Something was really done right to gel this to happen! Figures 2.1 and 2.2 need to
be readable (higher resolution?). Figure 2.2. Englewood Water /Mains/Lines?) over 8
inches in Diameter. I know whet you mean but citizens might not .
Comment 5: I've attached a brochure from the City of Calgary, Alberta, that encourages
residents to collect rainwater for their landscape watering. I suggest that Englewood
consider this practice. Ottawa, Ontario, Convention Centr!I collects rainwater for toilet
and urinal flushing saving 359,000 gallo,1s per year-another practical consa,vation
approach.
I appreciate that this is a Water C<>nservatlon Plan bid I think it concentrates too much
on reducing water use including punitive m!lasures, and not enough on eff,cienl use of
the resource . I believe the plan should discuss collaboration with other City departments
to achieve some of the goals For instance working with Parks and Recreation for
educational seminars and evali gardens and aftemative grasses for lawns, or
Community Development to achieve a balance between landscaping requirements and
water use.
Englewood participates in the Arbor Day Foundations Tree City program promoting a
healthy url>an forest. Water plays an essential part in maintaining that urban forest. The
only men '· , of trees In the entire plan is on page 25 where ii talks about removing
native treo species as a way of conse,ving water! EMC 16 -6-7 details required
landscaping standards for new Jevelopment and again this plan doesn 't really addr!lss
the water use issues presented by these City requirements .
Public education is an essential P.'ement if this plan i~ to succeed, but aside from the
Pipeline publication, while wide:y distribul!ld I suspeci isn't widely read, there seems lo
be little else. In fact, according to Page 27 Xeriscape education Is /aft to Denver Water.
While the Water Day for school children Is a laudable program, It is the parents who
make most of Iha water 11sa decisions I would hate to see Englewood burled in
mo11ntains of crushed rock simply because It requires less water.
Comment 6: Every toilet that Is in an Englewood controlled building should be modified
or replaced witlJ low usage ones,.,fire sretions , police buildings • court houses
.... Englewood. Public buildings.etc ,.all I
Comment z-"Water Conservation Plan· Will we keep /he code below? It does not
require ell flat rate customers to be updated. Is thst collect?
"The Englewood Municipal Code includes a requiremenr for all flat-rate customers to
install approved water meters when they sell or transfer their property. The Code
stares: "All owners of property having unmetered water service shall be required to
install approved water meter within ninety (90) clays after the safe or transfer of the
property or change in pro_~erty usa from residential to commercial or industrial.
Whenever a meter ,s to be installed, it shall he supplied by the Englewood Utilf.'1as
Department at the owners cost."
Comment 8: After reading Mr. Woullard's article in the Hub regarding water
conservation, it raelly peaked my interest es I em one of tha 10,00{0) plus homes on a
water mater.
I understand there era 2,074 slngta family dwellings under Iha flat rate system, and I am
sure several of these homeowners ara trying to conserve water. However, thEtra are a
percentage of the~~ homes that are taking advantage of this system. I have a neighbor
that will use one of the fountain type sprinklers. They will set ii in one spot in th.:-
morning and it will still be In Iha same spot in tha attemoon. When confronted as to why
they wo11/d do such a thing there comment is "we don) care we don ·1 pay for water. • In
addition I drive s . Logan to Belleview to encl from woo every week . There are a few
houses where the water is on in the afternoons prior to 6:00 pm. I do not know whether
these homes are metered or on the flat rate system, either way they should not be
weten'ng during the heat of the clay.
My opinion is that all single family dwellings should have a meter installed sooner than
later.
.,
•
•
•
•
•
•
2013 ENGLEWOOD WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
COMMENTS AND RESPONSES
The City of Englewood has completed its 60-day pub lic review period for the
water conservation plan that began on May 1, 2013 through July 1, 2013 . Official
notification was posted in the Englawood Herald (copy attached). During the pre -
approval period, three newspaper articles were published ; an article In the Denver Post,
Your Hub dated May 29, 2013 , "Englewood creates waler c?nservation plan, seeks
input,• an artide In lhe Coyote Gulch dated May 1 , 2013 , "Eng lewood rolls out draft
water conservation plan #CO drought ,· and an article in the Englewood Herald dated
April 26, 2013, "Waler plan awaits comment." A complete copy of the plan was
available at Englewood Civic Center and on the City 's webs ite . During the public-review
period, the City received eight comments on the plan.
The following is a list of the comments, summary of the core issues con\ayed In
the public comments , and Englewood 's response.
COMMENTS :
Comment 1: I :.::ongly recommand that eve,yone involved with Iha water conservation
plan be required to read "Rainwater Harvesting for Dry/ands and Beyond Vol. t-3" by
Brad Landcaster. I would also like to see the city use mortt xeriscaping around city
facilities . It's baffling why you have lawn around places like the wrP, city maintenance
fecility, Police station, etc. Tho only person who ovor sets toot on those expanses of
grass are the p( ,pie who mow them, truly a waste of water ;md maintenance. Allow
and implement tl,e use of greywater. Give inct1nlives for xeriscaping. Limit the amount
of grass for new homes and busi11asses and require the use of low water usage
grasses. Go to a mandato,y 3 day a week watering schedule all of the time .
RESPONSE:
Xeriscape Programs and Measures
Several comments requested the incorporation of xeriscape programs and incentives .
The City did conside r xeriscape programs during the initial screening of potential
conservation measures and programs . Based on the City's screening criteria /1 . staff
time 2 financia l lmpUcatlons and 3 political ramifications). the City does noJ_~
have the staff resources to implement xeriscape programs and did not feel \he
programs merited outt;na monex mto ii The City wm re-eva luate xeriscape measures
and programs wjth future wat.1r conservation planning efforts . Englewood residents are
encouraged to utm·z;e xeriscaoe landscape.
Comment 2 : Weter is the staff of life ..... we o/1 know that. We cannot do without it and
our quality of fife , particularly here in the dry Western D•sert, depends upon /he
avsi/sbilily of good, cle.:m water. I sm sure that is why our c,vic leaders in Englewood
worked so harr/ to obtain water rights for Englewoor/-lo insure that our quality of life
would remain high because we had enough water. In the 1 g7o ·s, Englewood had s "flat
rate " wster billing system. Ws paid in advance, and the city had a stable, absolutely
predictable fund lo pay /he cost o/ providing water. Our lawns and neighborhoods were
green and inviting. The name "Englewood" seemed to describe our green urban forest.
Now we have water meters and we sell our "excess " water to more affluent
neighborhoods. The rationale for this wss thsr by selling our ex cess water, Eng/ewood
would have plenty and 011r rates would stay tower rhan su"oundlng ci•les .
Unfortunately, this hasn 't worked out. Denver rates right now are $2.5911000 gallons
plus $6.3.1 admln fee; Englewood 's rate Is $3 .2911000 geltons plus a $9.71 admin fee . If
you use 10,000 gallons in a bi/1/ng period you pay $4 .26/1000 gs/Ions in Englewood, vs
$3.22/1000 gallons In Denver. As just a side note, if you are one of Englewood's "out of
city" metered c:ustomers, you only pr1y an admin fee of $9 .22. So much for lhs l~eory of
"sell off our water and pay lsss for the waler we use."
Over the past severs/ decades, as Englewood's waler policy has moved from a f/11I rate,
predictable cost to a metered cost, Englewood's neighborhoods have consistently
declined in appearance . Certainly a big part of thet has been the fact thst bluegrass
lawns are water guzzf11rs and have become very sxpensive to maintain under the
current water pricing system, and as you drive through the city you can see numerous
homes with dead or abandonsd fawns, but also fewer gardens and more neg/ected
trees. No rational person is going to suggest that we encourage bluegrass lawns, or
running water in tho gutter. But our policies ars no/ encouraging APPROPRIATE
WATER USE to Keep Englewood Beautiful. As Iha appearance of our neighborhoods
continu11s its decline, so does the desire lo live here, raise s family, participate in civic
affairs, and so forth. Our water policies have contributed to this decline even though we
seem lo have enough water to take s more enlightened approach, saving water
appro,:-riately, but encouraging water use that keeps Englewood an attractive, livable
city. It ,s vexing to me that Englewood's neighborhoods cant afford lhe water that we
era selfing to other, more affluent metro neighborhoods to wasra on THEIR lawns and
green space, which they seem lo do with reckle ss abEmdon. aven to the point, In
H ighlands Ranch. of penalizing homeowners who do not use enough water on their
lawns. Obviously, they have recognized thar people wan / to five and do business in a
city which has visually appealing trees, landscaping, 1md so forth. We apparently
haven1 figured I/rat out, even though we already l1avs the water resource s.
Obviously, tna cost of wate r is a much small part of a family 's budget in a more affluent
•
•
•
•
•
•
community than It is in less affuent EngleWO<Jd. So I sec, nothing in the propoSlld Water
Conservation Ptsn to encourage the APPROPRIATE USE of the water Englewood
owns to improve the quality of the appearance and livability of the City of Englewood,
taking into account that our city is not as affluent as some of our Southern neighbors.
For Instance, Enr;;ewood 's development guidelines require trees, and our Concrete
Replacement plan requires replacement trees when a tree is removed next to a
sidewalk . But our water conservation plan gives no thought to the cost or effort involved
in owning a tree, or the water required. Trees are an expensive addition to a
homeowner's landscape. They re-~uire watering, maintenance, insurance, trimming, and
probably eventual expensr:e removal. I guess a "conservation minded" citizen should
simply do without trees. Bui can you Imagine Englewood without trees? Certainly Ille
''wood" part refers lo our attractive urban forest . I imagine the growing number of
apartment dwellers in Englewood feel that their waler rate should be lower, after all they
don't have trees, or grass or gardens, or flowers to tend, waler and maintain.
So ii seems lo me that Englewood homeowners should not be disadvantaged when
compared to apartment dwellers, or to homeowners in more affluent areas to whom
Englewood sells water. While a homeowner will probably use more water, much of that
will lo enhance the urban landscape , providing trees and landscaping which enhances
all of our quality of life . There is clearly a benefit to the community provided by
l1omeowners who invest in trees and appropriate landscaping, and a water conservation
program should recognize this benelit and encourage trees through water pricing. Tree
ownership should not be mandated by the City, and then immediately penalized by
Englewood's v 1/er pricing policy. Similarly, some thought should be given to the social
and community benefit provided by a homeowner who has a flower or vegetable
garden, enhancing the beauty of the neighborhood a11d the livability of the urban
landscape . These gardens should be encouraged, not penalized by water pricing when
compared to the person who only plants a water guzzling bluegrass lawn. Again, isn't it
curious that the City of f:nglewood is now subsidizing a community garden for people
(apartment dwellers) who cannot have their own garden, but gives no break to the
homeowner who owns, pays taxes on,· and provides his own garden ares. Additionally,
it is curious thfl' •his ·conservation Plan" doesn1 seem to encourage, or even to allow
some innovative • -onservslion techniques, such as grey water systems, rain barrels, low
"ow toilets, and so forth. Grey water systems should be encouraged when appropriately
designed and installed. There is no good reason why bathing or hand washing waler
cannot be used again for toilet "ushing before it passes back into the sanitary sewer
system. This does not affect the amount of water available for re-introduction back into
the river as treated effluenl, but will reduce lne amount needed to operate a household.
Similarly, cisterns designed to catch and USl• rainwater for parden or lawn, or household
use should be encouraged and allowed. It Is curious thal t:nglewood "claims· that runoff
rain water creates a slorm drainage burder, that rr.11st be remediated through a tax, but
will not allow a homeowner to catch and use that rainwater, thereby eliminating this
storm drainage burden . Homeowners should be encouraged to use low flow toilets, low
flow shower/leads, drip irrigation for floworbeds and gardens; if not through a rebate
program then at least through an education prograr.,, classes, product
recommendations. and so forth . Some considerable thought should be given to the
problems faced by a family trying to plan a family budget and the effects ot a constantly
changing water bl// wh . .:h seems to be out of their control. A family should ba able to
predict its water bill with some certainty, even through periods of drought. I suggest that
the city should use a base rate which comple/11/y accounts for 1h11 cost of 1h11 system
operations, plus a reasonable amount of waler for household use and landscaping;
(with an allowance for trees and gardens, as mention11d 1111rlier) and then hav11 a
surcharge for excessive use, and a11 eve11 higher rate for usagi, Iha/ is clearly wasteful
or abusive. Under this scenario, ;, family could reasonably plan and know Its costs, and
would be encouraged to not abuso or waste this waler resource, but would be
encouraged lo have traes, a garden, /lowers and so forth . The rate paid by apartment
dwellers should lake into account that someone else, i.e. homeowners and the City
through its parks, is paying the cost of the landscaping amenities, trees, lawns, and so
forth which we all e11joy in rhis SUBURBAN environment In Summary, we all know that
waste Is bad. Now we need to recognize that the quality of life in Eng/wood, in the
future , will be determined by how we allow and encourage appropriate use of the waler
resources we own, and which we are constantly reminded that are more than adequate .
Our Conservation Plan should plan for not just water conservation, but should embrace
innovative water saving lechnologios to "stretch" the water we can use, and should
ENCOURAGE THE APPROPRIATE USE OF WATER, using our pricing mechanism lo
insure Iha/ we have the kind of lendscliping, trees, gardens, flower~ and waler efficient
landscaping Iha/ w/11 "Keep Englewood Beautiful" and provide a high quality of life for
our residents and businesses.
RESPONSE :
See prior response on "Xerlscape Programs and Measures".
Water Rates
There were several comments provided regarding water rates. One comment
suggested that the City should use a base rate which accounts for the co~i of the
system operations , plus a reasonable amount or W'dler for household use and
landscaping ; (with an allowance for trees and gardens) and then have a surcharge for
excessive use, and an even higher rate for usage that Is dearly wasteful or abusive .
Incorporated Into the conservation plan is a future water rate study . The Fl~
consider all of the elements or this comment and determine if any changei. need to be
made to Englewood's current water rate structure.
Public Education
A couple of comments were provided regarding public education . Based on the City's
screening criteria (1 . staff time 2. financial Implications and 3. political rammcauonsl
the City does not currently haye the staff or financ ial resources to deyote to educational
classes However the otan Includes educational kits pubnc education through
newsletter bjil stutters and the city website online access to water bill and history and
distribut;on or ET irrigation scheduling in water bill. The City will re-evaluate education
measures and programs wllh future water conservation planning efforts.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Comment 3: Page ES-1. Paragraph 3, table ES1 would seem to indicate that water
used sllould bfl 70,877 AF (or are you rflferring to a savings?). Page 12, reference to
fig 2.4; do we really charge less for more consumption? $2.04 for heavier users vs.
$3. 29 for lighter users ... That would seem to discourage conservation. Page 15,
reference to fig 2. 5 should oe 2. 6 (or vice versa).
RESPONSE :
A comment was made regarding the fact that Englewood 's current rate structure
charges less per 1,000 gallons for water consumption over 400 ,000 gallons . To.Q
current rate structure recognizes that large users , as a class . do not contribute to the
peaking cost of the system as much as the smaller users n 1s uallkelv that residents
will reach tbe 4Qp ooo gallon threshold. As mentioned nreviously a Mure water rate
study will evaluate the current water rates and determine if any changes need to be
made to Englewood's current water rate structure .
Comment 4· Table 2.2. Wll ere are th e Ra infall numbers from? Englewood, Watershed
from wl1ere we get our water, snowpacl<, does it exclude our snowfall, etc.? .... Id 1/l<e
to see a reference . Figure 2. 5. on the Y axis it Is really easy lo (mentally) put a comma
where there Is a period In the Y values · I would r9commend using the number without
decimals (e .g. 1000) or with only one decimal (e .g. 1000.0) ..... or just use billion gallons
with one decimal. Pretty amazing how waler use has gone down (3 billion to 2 billion)
.... Something wes really aon,1 right to get this to happen! Figures 2. 1 and 2. 2 need to
be readable (higher resolution?). Figure 2.2. Englewood Water /Mains/Lines?) over B
inches in Diameter. I know what you mean but citizens might not.
RESPONSE:
The ra infall numbers come from the National Wealher Service out of Denver International
Airport . Other recommended corrections are being taken into consideration
Comment 5· I've attached a brochure from the City of Calgary, Alberta, that encourages
resident.~ to collect rainwater for /heir landscape watering. I suggest that Englewood
consider this practice . Ottawa, Ontario , Convention Centre colle cts rainwaler for toilet
and urinal flush ing saving 359,000 gallons per year--another practical conservation
approach.
I appreciate that this is a Water Conservation Plan but I think ii concentrates too much
on reducing water use Including punitive measures, and not enough on efficient use of
the resource . I believe the plan should discuss collaboraNon with other City departments
to achieve some of the goals. For instance working with Parks and Recreation for
educatlonel seminars and even gardens and alternative grasses for lawns, or
Community Development to achieve a balance betwean landscaping requirements and
w11teruse.
Englewood participates in the Arbor D11y Foundations Tree City program promoting a
heal/hy urban forest. Water plays an essential part In mainlainir,g 1/ral urban forest . The
only mention of trees in the entire plun is or, pege 25 where ii talks about removing
native tree species as a way of conserving waler! EMC 16-6-7 details required
landscl'ping standards fur naw dtJvelopmenl 11nd again this plan doesn't rtJal/y address
the 1haler use issues presented by these City requirements .
Public educetion is a11 essential element if this plan Is lo succeed, but aside from the
Pipeline publlcaliun , w/ri/e widely distributed I suspect 1s•1't widely read, there seems to
be little else. In fact, 11ccurdlng to Page 27 Xerlscape education is left to Denver Water.
While the Water Day for school children is a leudebre progrem, it is the parents who
make most of the walar use decisions I would hate to see Englewood buried in
mountains of crushed rock simply because it requires less water.
RESPONSE:
Rainwater Harvesting and Graywater Reuse
There were a couple of comments made regarding ra inwater harvesting and
incorporating the practice into this plan . Capturing rajnwater js an ongojng issue jn
Colorado and ii is not allowed if it will injure vested water rights . For the most part
Colo,:ddo law does not allow homeowner to collect or use rainwater runoff from roofs
1mless their only source or water Is a well on the property.
In 2009, however, the Colorado Stale Legislature passed two lawa that carve out
exemptions fmm the general rule . The first law says that jf you are not served by a
domestic wat, 1wte!:!1M.c' you are located in a designated ground water basin or vour
collection system qualifies as exempt from 37-92-602(1 )(g)(ll you are allowed to
capture rainwater for household. flre protection. stock watering and irrigation of up to
one acre of lawns and gardens as long as it is applied to uses specified jn the weu
permit that appUes to vour property . The second law allows the State to participate in a
study of 10 new developments to determine the Impact of capturing rainwater on
streams rivers and tributary groundwater .
Add itionally a couple of comments were made regarding graywater reuse . IblJecm
"aravwater" means discharges from bathroom and laundry room sinks. bathJubs.
showers. laundry machines and other sources authorized by the Colorado Water
aualily control Commission In May 2013 the Colorado General Assembly passed
House Bill 1044. which authorized the use of graywoter . The majorjty of Englewood 's
•
•
•
•
•
•
water rights do not allow for reuse particularly if that reuse involve, further consumption
of the water
See pri or response , ·xerlscape Programs and Measures .·
Comment B· Every toilet that is in an Englewood controlled building should be modified
or replaced with tow usage ones fire stations, police buildings, court houses Englewood
Public buildings, etc. all !
RESPONSE :
City Building Fixtures
A comment was made that every toilet that 1s in an Englev,;ood controlled building
should be modified or replaced with low usage loil ets . Currently . as new toilets and
fixtures are needed in City build ings low water use fixtu res are used as a replacement.
Comment 7: 'Water Conservation Plan' Will we keep the code below? It does not
require all flat rate custo"1ers to be updated. Is that coll6Ct?
RESPONSE:
Mete1 /119
The Englewood Municipal Code Includes a requ irement for a ll flat-rate customers to
Install approved water meters when lhey sell or transfer their property. The Code
states : All owners of property having unmetered water seryice shall be required to
install approved water meter within ninety (90l days after the sale or transfer of Iha
property or change lo property use from residential to commercial or industrial .
Whenever a meter Is to be Installed. It shall be supplied l>y the Englewood Utilities
Department at the owners cost
Comment 8: After reading Mr. Woutlard 's article in the Hub regarding water
conservation . it really peaked my Interest as I am one of the 10,00[0] plus homes on a
water meter.
I understand tnere are 2,074 single family dweII;ngs under the flat rate system, and I am
sure several of these homeowners are trying to conserve water. However, there are a
pe,.::entage of these homes that are taking advantage of this system. I have a neighbor
that will use one of the fountain type sprinklers. They wm set it in one spot In the
morning and It w/11 still be In the same spot in the 11ftemoon. When r;onfronted as to why
they would do such II thing there comment is '\ve don1 care we don't pay for water." In
addition I drive S. Logan to Belleview to and from work every week . There are a few
houses where the water is 011 in Iha allemoons prior to 6:00 pm . I do 1101 know whether
these homes are met11red or 011 the nat rate system, either way they should not be
watering d•l(ing the heat of the day.
My opinion is that all sl11gle family dwellings should have B meter installed sooner than
later.
RESPONSE ;
See prior response , "Metering .'
•
•
•
•
•
•
Mandatory Watering Schedule
A resident requested that Englewood go to a mandatory three-day-a-weJk watering
schedule on a permanent basis . While this may be necessary during a water shortage
c.r drought, the City felt that a mandatory three-day-a-week watering schedule is not
necessary to reach its water corservation goals .
Xeriscape Programs and Measures
A couple of comments requested the Incorporation of Xeriscape programs and
incentives . The City did consider Xeriscape programs during the initial screening of
potential conservation measures and programs . Based on the City's screening criteria
(1 . staff time , 2. financial implications and 3. political ramifications ), the City does not
currently have the staff resources to implement Xeriscape programs and did not feel the
programs merited pi;•ting money into it. The City will re -evaluate Xeriscape measures
and programs with futu,.i water conservation planning efforts . Englewood residents are
encouraged to util ize Xeriscape landscape .
Turf and Landscape Restrictions/Standards for New Construction
One comment requested that Englewood limit the amount of grass for new homes and
businesses and require the use of low water usage grasses. Englewood staff
considered turf and landscape restrictions/standards for new construcbon . Based on
the City's screening criteria ( 1. staff time, 2. financial implications and 3 . political
ramifications), the City decided to re -evaluate new constructions restrictions and
standards with future water conservation planning efforts .
Mandatory Watering Schedule
A resident requested that Englewood go lo a mandatory three-day-a-week watering
schedule on a permanent basis . While this may be necessary during a waler shortage
or drought, the City felt that a mandatory three-day-a-week watering schedule is not
necessary to reach its water conservation goals .
Water Rates
There were several comments provided regarding water rates. One comment
suggested that the City should use a base rate Which accounts for the cost of the
system operations, plus a reasonable amount of water for household use and
landscaping; (with an allowance for trees and gardens) and then have a surcharge for
excessive use , and an even higher rate for usage that is clearly wasteful or abusive .
Incorporated into the Conservation Plan is a waler rate study . The study will cons ider
all of the elements of th is comment and determine if any changes need to be made to
Englewood 's current water rate structure .
One resident was concerned that the City Code regarding the conversion of flat-rate
customers to metered customers was changing to require flat-rate customers to install
meters. The City Code is not changing . The Englewood Meter Replacement Program
(EMAP) discussed in the Plan is voluntary. EMAP takes the difference between what
the customer pays for the non-metered rate and what the customer would pay for the
metered rate and uses that money to help pay the cost of installing the water meter. If
provided a grant by the CWCB , Englewood would like to expand upon their current
program by providing 50 to 100 meters at no cost to the customer while the customer
continues to pay the flat rate charges. as further incentive for meter replacement. If the
customer converts , the money received by the City would go lo providing a meter for
another flat rate customer.
The City would like lo respond to an inaccuracy regarding Englewood 's water rates as
compl!red to Denver's water rates . The comment states that Denver rates are
$2 .59/1 ooo gallons plus $6 .33 admln fee ; Englewood's rate is $3 .29/l000 gallons plus a
$9. 71 admin fee Accord ing to the resident , if you use 10,000 gallons In a billing period
you pay $4 .2611000 gallons in Englewood , vs $3 .2211000 gallons In Denver . However,
the calculation did not consider that Denver Water bil ls monthly while Englewocd bills
on a quarterly basis . II we ex:,mine a scenario in which one uses 10,000 gallo11s per
month fc,r a three-month period, an Englewood resident would pay $3 .6111,000 gallons
as compared to $3 .22/1,000 gallons in Denver .
•
A comment was made regarding the fact that Englewood's current rate structure •
charges less per 1,000 gallons for water consumpUon over 400,000 gallons. The
current rate structure is an incentive for industry and large water users and il is unl ikely
that residents will reach the 400,000 gallon threshold. As mentioned previously, a water
rate study will evaluate the current water rates and determine if any changes need to be
made to Englewood's current water rate structure.
Rainwater Harvesting and Graywater Reuse
There were a couple of comments made regarding rainwater harvesting and
incorporating the practice into this Plan . Capturing rainwater is an ongoing issue in
Colorado, and it is not allowed if It will Injure vested water rights . For the most part,
Colorado law does not allow homeowner to collect or use ra inwater runoff from roof
unless their only source of water is a well on the property.
In 2009, however, the Colorado State Legislature passed two laws that carve out
exemptions from the general rule -The first law says that n you are not served by a
domestic water system and you are located in a designated ground water basin or your
collecllan system qualities as exempt from 37-92-602(1)(g)(I), you are allowed to
capture rainwater for household, fire protection , stock watering and irrigation of up lo
one acre of lawns and gardens as long as it is applied to uses specified in the well
permit that appl ies to your property. The second law allows the State to ,:Jrtlclpate In a
study of 10 new developments to determine the impact of capturing ralnwatP.r on
streams , rivers and tributary groundwater. •
;. .
•
•
•
Additionally a couple of comments were made regarding greywater reuse . The term
"graywater" means discharges from bathroom and laundry room sinks, bathtubs,
showers, laundry mach ines and other sources authorized by the Colorado Water
Quality Control Commission. In May 2013, the Colorado General Assembly passed
House BIii 1044, which authorized the use of graywater . The majority of Englewood's
water rights do not allow for reuse , particularly ii that reuse involves further consumption
of the water .
Public Education
A couple of comments were provided regarding public education. Based on the City's
screen ing oiteria (1 . staff lime, 2. financial implications and 3. political ram ifications),
the City does not currently have the staff resources to devote to educational classes .
However. the Plan Includes educational kits, public education through newsletter. bill
stutters and the City Website . online access to water bill and history and distribution of
ET irrigation scheduling in water bill. The City will re-evaluate education measures and
programs with future water conservation planning efforts .
City Bulldlng Fixtures
A comment was made that every toilet that is in an Englewood controlled building
should be modified or replaced with low usage toilets . Currently, as new toilets and
fixtures are needed in City buildings, low water use fixtures are used as a replacement.
Water Rate Comparlaon •
EnqJewood v,. Denver
•Bu■don :
Slngle•lamlly re1ldenU1I
Size ¾ Inch meter
Auumptlons:
• 120,000 Gal Total Annual Consumption
1,000 Gal pe r month for 9 rnonth1
10,000 Gal pe r montn tor 3 montns tSummer)
Category ( Aver-Month) ENGLEWOOD
Service Charge 53_2,
Consumption Coat $32 .90
Totol monthly 8111 $38.14
Auumptlont:
1150,000 Cal Total Annual Conaumptlon
• 10,000 Gal per month for 9 month■
20,000 Gel per mot,th for 3 month, (Summer)
Category (Average Month) ENGLEWOOD
Service Charge $3.24
-
Consumption Coit $41 .12
--· ····--· --
I Total monthly Bill $44.36
Dl!NVl!R
(lnelde)
$6.33
$29.14
$35.47
•S0 .67dlff.
DENVER
(lnaldt)
S 8.33
$38.20
-----
544.53
+ S0 .17 dlff.
•
Dl!NVl!R
(Ou t olde)
SS.33
$32.98
$39.29
+$3.15dlff. •
DENVER
(OUtlldt)
S 8.33
----
$43.22
$49.55
+ $5.19 d lff .
•
• 1 .•
•
•
• APPENDIX D
Englewood City Council Adoption
•
•
•
ORDINANCE NO .
SERIES OF 20 I 3
BY AUTHORITY
COUNCIL BILL NO. 37
INHODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER WOODWARD
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 16, CHAPTERS 5 AND 11 PERMITTING
DISTILLERIES . BREWERIES AND WTNERIES IN THE crrv OF ENGLEWOOD .
WHEREAS , in 2012 the Englewood Planning anJ Zomng Commission heard requests for a new
brewery and separately heard of plans for a new di s!illc,y, which was not allowed Wlder the cunem
Unified Development Code; and
WHEREAS , the S1a1c licenses and regulates these industries but lhe En glewood Planning and
Zoning Commissi on, the Englewood Liquor Authority and lhe City Council hereby find that the
State has not pre-empted the City ,f Englewood's Home Rule powers relating to the zoning of
these industries; and
WHEREAS, there was consensus from the Englewood Planning and Zoning Commission to
research these indus1ries and consider Code amendments to facilitate new busine ss devei opmcnt~
and
WHEREAS , the Englewood Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that City Council
approve an ordmance to allow disti lleries and clarify lanl!Uage on breweries and wineries and allow
d,stilleries. breweries and winerie, as Pennitted Uses in 1-1 and 1-2 disuicts and as Conditional
Uses in the M-2. MU-8-1 and MU-D-2 Districts as long as the businesses are limited in size and
desiifled 10 encourage ?Cdestrian traffic with such activities as tap rooms, retail sales, tours , etc .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO , AS FOLLOWS :
Scc c,!ll.l. The City Council o:1hc City of Englewood , Colorado he:eby authorizes omending
Title 16, Chapter S, Section I, Subsecti on C, entitled Table of Allowed Use.< of the Englewood
Municipal Code 2000, lo read as follows:
1
• • •
COMMERCIAL USES
Adult Use All types as defined in I' p 16-5-2.C .I
Chapter 16-1 1
Agricultural Use Greenhouse/ nursery. raising I' I' I G-5-2.C .2
o f plants. flowers, or nursery
stock
Animal Sales aud Service Animal shelte r pp
KcnncVday care L pp
Pct store (li ve anima l s.1 lc) p p r I' Pr
Small animal veterina ry L L I' C p p
hospit:1 1 or dime
Assc1ut,iy Assembly hall or auditorium, p I' p C P r
hall rental for meetings or
social occas ions
'
Mem bershi p organ izati on t' p p C I' I'
(excluding adult use)
Dependent Care Dependent care center (le ss c c cc C P I' p p p p p C 16-5-2.C.7
lhau 24-hour c.11e, any age)
Entenainmcnt/Amusc 1ne111 : Aluusemcnl establi shment C C C C cc
In door
llookah lounge p p r pp
l'h ysicu l fitness ccn1er/sp.1 I ' I' I' I-' p p
Theater and p p p pp
perfonnancc/concen vcnut:.
not including :i.dult
en tertainment
l ·-
F.nlcnainmcnt/ Am uscmcn 1. General outdoo r rcc n .. -atiou C cc
Outdocr
Financ ial lnsti lutio11 Chcd cash ing faeilily p p pp
• • •
• • •
Financial institu1ion. with L r I'
drive-through service
Financial 1n ~titution, without p p p p P r
drive-through service
I
Food and Beverage Service Brcw.fub I' p p p pp
Caterer p p pp
Hie,ee,e ef'.I p pp
Keslaurant, bar , ta vern with r p p p pp
or without outdoor opcralions
I Restaurant, with drive-L pp
through service
~lcs..H.ggm ,~i11,'1 ~ilh I,; i;; i;;; i;;;i;
~ l1is1ilh;011u
5
~
Take oul and delivery only I' p p
Medical/Scienti fi c Scr ... tcc Clinic I' I' p p p p p p p
Hospita l I' p p p p p
Laboratory (dental, medical p p p p p p p r I' p
or oplica l)
Medical Marij uana Medica l marijuana center p p p p p 16-5-2.C.13
16-54.C.l.f
MeJi cal marijuana op1ion.1J A A A pp I 6-5-2.<.:. 13
prcu ,iscs cultivation I 6-54.C. I .f
operation
Medica l marij uan3 infused ... . I\ p p I 6-5-2.C . I 3
producrs mJnufacturer 16-54.C.J.f
• • •
• •
Office 011icc, type I (genera l) p p p p p I' p p p
Office, type 2 (limited) p r r p p I' p p p p 16-S-2 .C.8
Retai l Sa les and Service Crematorium C
(Personal Service)
Dry cleaner, <lrop-ofT site p I' p p p p
only
Instru ctional servi ce p p p p p
Massage U1erapy p p p p p p pp
Mon uary p p
Personal care I' r p p pp
Service: photography studio p p p p p p
and photo lab, upholstery.
printc r1 lockmiilh: bilor
jTauoo and body-piercing
cstablis:hm~nl
pp
Temporary employment cc 16-5 -2.C.II
"bus iness
I
Retail Sales and Service Equipment renta l i
j L pp
(Repai r and Rental) I
· Repair shop (nut including p p p p pp
auto)
Rct3i l Sales •nd Service (S:lc<) Anti que ~1ore p p p p I' p
A rt gall ery p p p p pp
Au1.:tiuu )1ousc I' r r
Buy-b•ck, second -hand . p p p p
thrift , consignmenl stores,
large
i
• • •
• • •
Buy-back, second-hand, p p p pp
thriO , consignmcnl sro res.
small
C..onven 1cnce store p p p p p
Grocery/specially food store p p p p p I'
Internet sales location I' p pp
Liquor store p p l' p p I'
Pawnbroker I' p 16-5-2.C .IO
Retail sales, gener.tl p p p P/C pp ForTSA,
merchandise P if S:Z0 ,000 sq. ft.,
C if> 20,000 sq. ft .
of gioss lcasahlc
noui ar..:a
School Trade or business school l' p p C pp 16-5 -2 .C.12
9
Studio Radio/tcl\:vi sion broadcastin g
studio, r.xordingl lil m n ·,io I p p pp
V d 1idc and Equipmen t Automobile pawnbroker p pp 16-5-2.C.IO
Automotive saJcs. re ntal L pp 16-5 -2.C .3
Automotive service and r r 16-5 -2.C.~
re pa ir, includ in g bu.Jy or
fende r work
Autom olive scrv,.::c anJ L l' l' 16-5-2 .C.4
re pa ir. no t inch:Ai ing body or
fender •.,ork
Atll omolive scn·ice ~lat io n L r P 16-5-2.C .5
(gasoline faci lity)
Car wash. a ulu Ucta iling L LL 16-5-2.C.6
16-5-2.C.4
Cc mmcrcial s torage of r r 16-5-2.C.3
• • •
• •
opcr..iblc vehicles
Fuel dispensing L r r
Parking fai;i lily. su-uc.:1u1c C C C C L L C pp 16 -5 -2.C .3
(operoblc vehicles), princ ipal 16-5-2 .C.14
use
Parking area, surface C C C C L L C pp 16-5-2.C9
(operable vehicles). principal 16-5-2.C.3
USC
Recri.:al ional vehi cles and L pp
boals, sa les or rent.11
Visilor AccornmodEllion Bed and break fost P r r
l-lotcl p p p p p
Hotel, extended stay p p r
11
Wholesa le Sa les 3nd di stri but ion I 1 I' p i
I
MANUFACTURING/INDUSTRIA L USES
Industrial Scrv,cc lndus,ria l service, lighl
I
C pp 16-5-2.D.3
(TSA only)
Indust ria l servic e, heavy p
Manufa ctu ri ng. Including ~ .c i;; i,; f !! !.LJ.-2.C.U
Processing, fa bri ca tion, o r
Assembly
~ ~ ~ i;; f [! ~-ll
~ s;; s;; C ff J.6~-l.C.L4
Man u fac turi ng, li ght C r r 16-5-2.D.4
(l'SA only)
Manufoc tu ri ng, hea vy I'
• • •
• • •
Warehouse/ S1oragc Fuel s lorJgc (principal use) L
Mini.storage facility I' I'
Moving antl s1orage I' p
Ouldoor storage pp 16-6 -7 .G
Slorage yard for vehicles, pp 16-5-2 .D.6
cquipmcm, malcnal, and/or
supplh:s
Warehousing and/or storage I' p
Was1e/Salvagc Aulomobile wreckmg/ er 16-5-2.D.1
'-a lvagc yard
Commercial inci nera tor C
1-iazardous waste handling cc 16-5-2.D.2
13
-Ip P ii 6-5-2 .D.5 Rec ycling ope ration , all
proccssi ng occurs with in I enclosed stru clurc I
I
Recycl ing operation, so me or cc IG-5-2.D.5
all proce ssing occurs o utside
3n enclosed structure
S.in itary sc rvic.c C
Wnstc tran s fer station (not cc
indud ing hazard ous waste)
[EL>ITOR 'S NOTE: 16-5 · I . I ACCESSORY CSES co ntains no ch anges and is 1h ercforc no t in cluded here]
[EDITOR . S NOTE : I 6-;-1.1 TEMPORARY USES contains no cha nges and is lhoreforc ;1ot included here]
[EDITOR ·s NOTE : 16-5-1.! USES NOT MENTIONED cor.tains no changes and is therefore not included here)
I
I
• • •
•
•
•
~-The Ci1y Co uncil of 1he Cily of Englewood, Coloru uo hereby authorizes amending
Title 16 , Chap1er S, Sect ion 2, Subsection C, by the addition of a new Paragraph 14 entitled
"Breweries , D1st11lenes and Wineries ," of the l!nglewood Municipal Code 2000 , to read as
follow s:
[EDITORS NOTE : 16-5 -2(C)( I) lhrouK)i (I )) co ntai ns no changes and is therefore no 1 included
here ]
16-5-2 : Uso-Sp,cific Standard•.
C . Commercial U.1·es.
JJ . Brewen·es Distiiifrii!s ltlorri ex one/ Vinrner'r ResCPllcanU,
n. Within the M-2, MU-B-1 and M\J-B-2 djstrjcts these uses shan be pcnnjucd
oulv in coniunc1ion wi1b.::! rssmuram tavern rcrnil slles or sales room located on
1h.uame premise$ as the manufacturing of the hcvrrnec
~ Wilbin tbs M-' MLJ-Q-1 and MU -B -2 diwricls these usss shnll not exceed
.1.Q.QQC.l.u ui 1re feet of vruss flour ars,.
" An on-nDimise5 sals§ room max be a gaa_qfths 2nociolc use as Ions as the Qagr
area utilized for the sales mom is less than or eauallgJhinv nercem QOo/nl of the
101•1 floor area o{Jhe facjlj1y or ope 1b0w1AWI sgllilf~ (AAI O 000}.,whi!ihs:,:erJs
aw1er.subiect IP su11e apd Federal regulation s,
~ These uses mav include tbs Hie of food for consu mPtiou on the orsmis,,e,,1;,
subisct to Stnte I ieuor Code reauiremcASi.
" These uses shall be des igngland oomted in such a mawwr so as um 12 crss\ls;
nuisance imnacts on surroundioe w,es -
~-. The Cily Council of 1he City of Englewood. Co lorado hereb y au1horizes
amending Til le 16, Chapl er 11, Section I, Su hsec li on F(9) o f the Englewood Municipal Code
2000 , 10 read •s follows :
[EDITORS NOTE . 16-11 -l(A) 1hro11gh (F)(S) conlain s no change s and is therefo re nol included
here)
16-11-1: USE CLASSIFICATIONS.
F Co mm ercia l Uses.
9. Food and Deve rage Servi ce.
a. Characteristics . Th is category includes establishments, for example , restaurants ,
cafes, coffee shops, bars , taverns. and any food/beverage sales establishments,
wh ich sell food for on-or off-premise consumption . Accessory uses may include
decks and patios for outdoo r seating, drive-through facilities, customer ond
employee parklllG areas, and valet parking facilitic,.
b. Specific Use Type..-This categoiy includes the following us e typ es :
(I) Caterer . .' serv,, o consisting of prcp•rnti on and delivery of food and
bever;,Ee, for off-Fi te co nsump tion, without provision for on-site pickup or
cons.umr-t b n.
~ rtieFe Fi '",n '" ;\ fflailil) ftu lht! f:IFUthnt1iu11 w1J pa,I j~inlif. ofltee1· MFmettlM
on-t~o Hlr dis1Fihwtien 1 n1ail, er heluale eA er off lhe pr@m.is es
Tiu, uht1111 un,,11r pn;1Jtje1ie11 et's ttah fteilit~ oh,11 Rel erteud IJ ,900
~affel, af boor r•• )'•••·
(~ 1.) Re stnumnt , Ilnr, Tr,,em (with or wuhoutoutdooroperniions). A retail
estnhlishment where the princip al business i!; the sa le of food and beverages
in D ready -t o-conswnt! stulc . Thi i, use type includes luu ch co unte rs and
refreshment stands selling prep ared food and drinks for imm ediate
c.011sw11ptio!1 , Ope ration~ may include outd oo r scaling areas or outdoor food
service, subject 10 nil nppheo hlc use nnd deve lopm ent standards set fonh in
thi s·, Ille .
(4 ;l) RortJurant , with Dri\'e-Through Service . An eatingldrinltingcstabhshmenl in
wh id1 tlu: µr u~'.·ipal bu si11css is the sale of foods or beverages to the cust omer
in a ready-to -consume state :in d in whi ch th e dcs1g11 or method of operatio n
of all or any ponion of the busines s ,,Hows food or beverage s to be se rved
directly to the customer in a motor vehicle without the need for th e customer
10 exit the mot or vehicle .
(5 i) Take Out and Del ivery Only . An eating/drinking cstao lishment , generJlly
withoul patron seating. Lhat pruvidcs food mtd/or bc vc 1agc:s to be del ivered
or to be ''1ckcd typi ca ll y to r consump11 011 off l he prem is e,;; .-1f ~11ch
establishment
(6 ~ ~-A""""'""' that ineluded,th&l>rewing -of-beef-os-afl-800e;;S&f)'
~~ "'&i•RIB ef~ee,pFedue1 ie n ef&Y•h ffl•ilil ) sktill R•I o.ioo...i 1, •
theusand-four-(-2,400)-bnFJels per yea,. A mta il es tnhliduusnubil
manufac1urs; nPi mun: than seventY-four tlK2Usand (74 000\ ea\lons (2 400
baaslsl of f031J liauor or ISm>snted malt brxrrm ~r.5 on iJ:a 1mssd mem,sc.\.
16
•
•
•
•
•
[EDfCORS NOTE : 16-11-1 (F)(I 0 through 19) contt,ins no changes and is therefore not included
here]
~-The City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado hereby authonzes amending
Title 16, Chapter 11 , Section I, Subsection O(2)(b) and (c) of the Englewood Municipal Code
2000, to read as follows :
G. ,\1anufactu,,.inglfndw.trial lltics.
2. Manufacturing , Including Proces siny, F'abricatilm, or Nisc:mbl y.
u. Characteristics. Industrial cs1nbhshments involved ,n 1he manufacturing, processmg,
fabrication , packaging, or assembly of goods. Natural , mnn -llUlde, row, secondllJ')', or
panially complc1cd materials may be used in the manufac1urin~ process . Products
mny be finished or semi-finished w1d are generall y made for !he wholesale market,
for trnusfer 10 other pla nts, or to orct t.r for finn~ or co nsumer~. Such uses m~y also
include industries furnishing labor in the case of the refinishing of nianufaclUred
articles . Custoon indusiry is included (e.g ., cstnblisluncnlS primarily engaged in !he
01Hiile produr:tion of goo ds lJY hand ma.nufocturing involvm@ the use o f hand loo ls
and small-scule c:<juipmtlll). Guuds uro geucrally nul display,-u u, ;ulJ un she, bul if
so, !hey arc n subordinnlc pan oftolal sales. Relatively few c1s1omcrs come 10 the
manufocluring site. Accessory acliVllies ,nay include limned reia,I sales, offices,
cafeleria s, parking, employee recreu1ional facilities, warehouses, slorage yards,
repa ir facililic ;, !ruck 0ccts, and caretaker's quaners .
b. Specifi c Us e Tn,cs. 'lni s category includes 1he following use 1ypcs :
W Bcewsn · Anv sstnbl1shment licensed bv thuPorooriate ~tote and Fedcrnl
ruthodt1es where m~lt liounrLnr Fswsmcd mah bexeravcs aq:,ma;wrac n1csd
c1.~lll.ba;.w...p,ub s Y~ dcfmsd Or as this definition max be modified in C R S
~
a> Pisfilleo'· ADY smablishmrnt.liccnscdJlYJhc nooroeriate ~t atc and Fedeu.11
authorities where smrituous liaucrs arc mnnufacturcd, Or, as this dcfini1 ion
mavh cmodiOcdinCRS 1247~)03
Ul Su 1,·r Roecr An cstablisNn,;nt or Portion ofa man ufanuri ns cswhlislun£Jll
lhiLPIIPWS CU§l9Ql9[§ to IPSlG SPWPISS ofwinc;~Diritu ous liYYO Pi
manufas1wed or Produced bv a,siugls dis11llcrv brewm or wineO' and
li cc nssd as a selcs roc12 Pwsuant 10 A Sm1s MonuJacturcr ·s License (C,R.,S.
12:47-4021 pr a Stars I united WinsD'. J icsnse iC RS 12:47 :403l A sales
room max includuhc Hie nfsuch Produas in addiliPP 10 rrlru;d,,items
~ips events scccial SYElllS smc11ain111s11Jtml/ur AK lll Or as this
dc fiouioo may be mgdi0ed in CR$ l~-47-IOJ •J seq
17
w ViD'PGC 's Rg.mmranr A CS lai LcHabJishmentJicensed hv the QPPIPPdillC Sti!IC
l!!lll.&<!•l'l!L•uthurit ics, IWII scll~cu•'\!!!!llll!il•1.•!!U!.•l:Jl••mi~l!S
that n,pnufacturH nPI more th;m two hwdrcdJift.x,,thguund l2SO 000\ salLqns
of wine on.il:, Premise ey.ch YliiiL
W JfincrYi AllY cstabli,;hm;ru JiccnsssJ bx 1hs;mnm2dt1ts Sta1'.Jlm~
outhorities whcg;,,ringys liAYPQi ore manufacturs1 CXSSPI thnl the lEffl\dOFS
~!ca v ,u,ner's Rsstaumm licensed eursuvm to 1 ~20 C R S. Qt
ilUbu..,g::lln,ilwnmav bs modified in CR S 12 ➔7·103,
(+ A) Manefacturing, Light: Mwiufac1uri11g uses lhlil do 1101 involve the generation
oulside lhc propcny uf11Ui>c, odur, vibrnliun , dusl , or hazard. Eump\es
include, bul are not limil<-d lu : as sembly of prc -fabricaled pans, manufacture
of electric, clcclronic. or uplicul in~lru.meut ~ or lle vlct!s; 111a11ufm:tu1·c and
assembly or artiricial limbs, dt:nlures, hc:w-inK aiUs, aml SW"J~ical instrumen1s ;
manufacture, procc~si ng, umJ pack.i11l( of ruoJ µruducl), co. 111Ctics, and
manufacturi ng ufcompont:nls. jewelry. cl othing, tri1111ni11~ dcc o;a tions, and
any similar item.
(~ ']J Maneft1c:turing. Heuvy : Munufuctw·i.ng uses that may involve the generation
outside 1hc property uf uui se, odor, vib ration , dust or h111.Ard . Examples
ir.clude , but are not lirn.itcU to : refining or initial pro cessing of raw materials,
•
rullin~. druwiu~. or exltttdin~ uf melols; and log decking, storage, and •
pondi111,:.
c. Exceptions. The manufacturing, processing, fab nc at ;o n , or a>sembly oflhe following
items is pmhibitc:<l :
(ll
R-l
(4-J)
CHl
Abra sives, basic manufacture;
,t\11i11n1l by•pr od ucts ! basic nmnufilct urc und process ing ;
Asphalt, 111m1ufnc1ure a11d processing;
Autumubile shraldiu~. ,ruslun~. hahug, compac ling and similar
operations ;
(9-.l.) Bi ologi cal was1c , processi ng;
(~ Bone black, basic manufacture ;
(8-l) Camon black or lamp block , basic manufacture;
18
•
• (0.al Charcoul , basic manufacture;
(~2) Chem ic>ls, heavy or industrial , bas ic manufacrurc or processing;
(J-1.1.1)\ Cinder ,nd cinder blocks, bas ic manufa cture or process ing;
l·P U,l Coal or cnke. manufacrure or processing ;
(Hll) Conc rete and concrete products, manufacture or fabricat ion;
(+4 J.l) Detergents , soaps and by-p roducts , using animal fat , basi c
manufacture :
(-I-SJ 1·eRHenteit fnu ts and ••ege1able pred1Jels , 1nen1JKleiure~
(*J.i) Fert ili zers , manufacture or processing ;
(,i.,il) f'ungic.:ide s, manufacture ;
• ,~w Gasses . other than nitrogen and ox ygen . manufacture;
(+9.ll) Ul ass manufac ture;
(~ll) Gluc am.I si ze:, manufac ture ·
(~J.2) Grain milHng ;
(~6.[) Graphite . manufacture ;
(;!;6.1.) Gypsum and other forms oi pla ster b1sc, manu fa cture ;
(~.W Insecticides , manufacrure;
(~,U) Insu lat ions , Onrnmnble types , manufa cture or fabrica tion;
(;!l,~) Ma1cht'S , mnnufo cture:
(~~) Meat slaughtering; • (;Ii~ Metal shredding and simil ar operations;
19
(29 t,]J Mctllls, extraction or smelling ;
(~ 2li) Me1:1ls . ingo t!., pigs , :;heets, or bars, manufacture ;
(,l-1-;z,9.) Oils w1d fats . a,11111,I and vcgelablc, manufacrurc ,
(~ W Paints, pigments, ennmc ls,japans, lacquers, puny, vamishc,, whiling,
and wooJ fillers , ma nufa cture or fabrication ;
(~ ll) Paper pulp and cellul ose, ba sic manufacture;
("4-W Paraffin, mr.nufacture:
(~ lJ) Pr.trolcum nnd petroleum products, m:mufocture or proce ssi11g;
t~ ~ Pon !anc1 anli similar cements, manufacture;
(,l-7 ll) Rubber, manufacture, or reclai mi ng;
(~ lg) Sa\\oni ll or plan ing m,hs;
\~ J.1) Serums. toxi ns. viruses . manufacru,e ;
(4Q l§) Suga rs and starches, manufacture ,
(4+ ~ Tannery,
{Q !ID Turpc1lline, uuu1ufactu1c,
(4-.! il) Wu.: 3nd wax produ cts. manufacture : tmd
(44 il) Wood preserving by creosot in g or other pressure impregnation of
wood by preservatives.
~-The City Council of the City of Englewood . Colorado hereby authorizes amending
Title 16 , Chapter 11 , Sc:c1iun 2, Subsection 8(2). "Definitiun ufll'urd.1·. Terms, a11J Phrases", of
the Englewood Municipal Code 2000, l,y insc11iug in alphabetical order to read as follows
16-11-2 : llcfinition of Words, Terms, and rhrases.
B. Definition or\Vurds, T c111is, and Phrases .
20
•
•
•
•
•
•
Scar An alsoh21is bcverasc mqdc bY brewios and fegpsntatino PPm swl& u&uallv malwi
t·arlev aod 0AY9rcd with hPPS and the like [Qr P sJishtlY bitter 'ASIC B;cr shall not GQOJ@io
mater 1han 6% a~tiot bY volume. 01hcrwisc i1 shall.12uw.siflcd as,JL'.'..IQ.irilµous ljguor · , :h:.
M this ds§oitioo max bs modified io C R S 12:17· l 03
Rcnvery · Aox euahlisbmcml licco-tcd.hx,the a2oronriali..;starc and fed;;al outhPrihr:s., \Yllm
wall liauors or fsm1sntsl mull bsxsrnre ars mruwfacwu;,d ;xcent brew mibs as dsfiosd Or as
Ibis definition mav be modified in C R:kl2-47-I0J
DblHferr AnsSJablishmsm licensed bx 1hc gpompriats; Sta·1c 1>nd f'eJcral uuthorifr~
snirituou$ liouors arc ma~t, ~ 1his definition maY,hc,,modifie4 j·· CR S 12-47-103
Alie, s8re1,e.:,: P faeili1. fer 1Re predu .. 1i0n end paehA~Rg efheer femumled ett 1he ftF@mi5es
~btttienc..iai!,-&r-whok,sai..,fl-ff-<ll+-lhe-premi,es. The ··ol•me ef"-1>rod"""""-"'
•••h fooihll shall aol on•••d I i!,UQQ l!e,··•I• of••••~•• yoa,. See def~
l'ood aad 8e•·e,ae• Sep•iee .
Sak( Reem· An es1ablishment, or oonion..of a maoufacturins csJablishmcnt that allows
~mcG lo tasrs s11 nmlss of wins bssr or-AAirituou§ lim,ots mom,factursd or Produced bv a
single distillca hrswmx m winso: end licsn$W Ma ulss mom PWliUBnt too Slats
Mauufaclurer ·s License fC RS 12:47-40'>} or a State Limited Wineo: I iscos IC BS 17-47·
®J). A sin room mils iuslude tbs sale of such groducU in addition to cslau:4 .itea mDrkrtinr
events s2ecial eYents emenainmem.andlmJ02d Or as this sh;OnitinnmiU'. be uJUJificd in
C.R.5.J)-47-IQJ~ seq ,
Tuuner ·r ReuaulQllt A rsrnil establishment licenc-•· · ·,y :o· annronriau; State and federpl
aulhurilies that sells food for consumotion on the or ~ ,,..s and that manufactures not more than
two huudrsri fiih:.Wwwmd ('50 000} ga,l lQ,ns of wins 20 its m issa cos;b vear,.
.!fjn erx Am:.cstablishm;m liccuscd bx lbs aooronriale,,,SJ.atftaud Federal authorities, where
xiuv.u §,,illlMfil.?rc manufactured sxcsm tl1a1 the term doss not include a Yintnsr·s Rcsta}l[iWl
lice nsed oursuant to 12-47-420 CR S Or as this definition mav be modified io CR S 12-47-
~ Safety Clause,. The City Council hereby finds , determines , and declares thnt tlu s
Ordinance is f •romulgatcd under the general police puwe, ufthe City ufEuglewood. that it is
promulgated ~,r the health . safety, and welfare of the public, md that this Ordinance is necessary
for the preser,auon of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and
welfare . The City Council funher detennines thal the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the
proper legislative object sought to be ob1.aincd .
21
~-Scvcrobility. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or pan of this Ord inance or the •
application thereof to ,ny person or circumsiances shall for :u,y reason be adjudged by a coun of
competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect , impair or invalidate the remainder
of this Ordinance or it application to other persons or circwnsUlllccs .
~7. Inconsistent Ordinances . All other Ordinances or ponions thereo f inconsistent or
conflicting with this Ordinance or :u,y ponion hereof are hereby repealed to the extent of such
inconsislency or conflict.
~!ion 8. Efl'~,1 of repeal or modification. The repeal or modi Ii cation of an y pr \wisiun uf
the Code uf the City cf Englewood by this Ordinance shall not release, CAtinguish , alter, modify ,
or ciumgc in wt-.olc or in part any penalty, forfeiture, or liability. cilhcr civil or criminal , which
shall have beeu incurred under such provision , nnd each provision shal l be treated and held as
still remaining m force fo r the purpose s of su.staining any and all proptT acti ons, suits,
proceedines. and prosecutions for the enforcem~-nt of the penalty, forfl'inirc, or liability, as well
as for lht purpose CJf sus tain ing any judgment , decree , or order which ;nu c-:-may be rendered ,
cmcrcd, or mnd e in such actions, suit s. proceedings, or prosecutio ns.
s~.c.tin n Y. ~ The Pena lt y l'r0m10n ni Section l-4-1 EMC shall apply to carh and
every violati on of thi s Ordinance
Introduced , read in full , and passed on first rcadi,g on th e 5th day "' ·\ugus t. 2013 .
Publi shed by T itle as a Dill for on Ordinance in the City's offici al news paper on the 9,h day of •
August, 20 13 .
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the City's officio! website bc~inrung "" the 7th day of
August. 2013 forthiny (30) :lays .
A Pu blic Henring wa s held on August I 9, 2013 .
ltead hy title and pa ssed on final reading on the 3rd day of September, 2013 .
Publi shed by title in the Ci<y's official new spaper as Ordinance No._. Series of2013 , on
the 6t h do y ofSeptcn,ber, 2013 .
Published hy titl e on the City 's offic,al wr.hsite beginning on the 4th da y of
September.20 13 forthiny (30) da ys.
22
•
•
•
•
11lis Ordinance shall lake effect thirty (30 ) days after publication following final passage.
Rnnd y P. Penn, Mayor
AlTEST:
Lo ucrishia A. Ellis. Ci1y Clerk
I, Loucri shia A. Elli s, Ci ty C lerk o f the C ity of Engl ewood, Color•do, hcrehy ce rtify that the
abo ve and forego ing is o tru e copy of the Ordinance pa ssed o n final readi ng and pu blished by
tit le as Ord inance No ._. Series of 20 U
Loucri shi a A. Elli s
2 3
•
•
•
OP Ul f · \NCE NO .
•,;:;;1,.,, IJF 2013
BY AUTHOlUTY
COUNCIL DILL Nu . .;~
INTRODUCED BY COUNClL
MEMBER GILLIT
AN ORDINANCE SUBMITTING TO A VOTE OF THE REGISTERED ELECTORS OF THE
cm· OF ENGLEWOOD AT Tl u: N[XT SCIICDUL[D MUNlCIP AL EltCTION A
QUESTION REGARDING OFFICIAL DESIGN ATION Of PARK PROi ERTY WITHIN THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .
WHEREAS, on August 7th an initiative pe1i1ion was submiltcd lo 1he City Clerk's Uflicc; and
WH .REAS. the Englewood Home Rule Charter and State Statutes provide that this mailer be
forwarded le the Englewood City Council after the City Clerk cectilie; the valid ity and
sufficiency of su ch mitiativc pct ii ion ; and
WHEREAS , the Englewood City Clerk has certif:ed the validity and sufficiency of the
signatures for the initiative petition; o· ..
WHEREAS, 1he City mus! own property or have the consent of the own er 10 dedicate the
property as a park ; and
WHEREAS, Hosanna is owned by Arapahoe Sch ool District No. I; and
V.'HEREAS , !he District has no: consented to dedication ; and
WIIEREAS , Council Bill No . 35 , Stries of 2013 was passed earlier on the agenda selling the
Englewood Depo1 ; and
\\~ IEREAS , the Englewood I Jome Ruic Charter Secti on 46 docs 001 all ow alteration of the
ini1iativc petition lanb'U•~• 10 clari fy the Hosanna and Depot properties .
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCll Of THE CITY Of
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, IBA T:
11 b Ii
~-It hns heen determined that 1hi .c; init iated orrlinance shall be ennctcd wi thout alterat ions
as provided for in Sec1ion 4G , of the Englewood Home Rule Charter.
~-There is hereby submiucd 10 the registered electors of the City of Englewood at the
next scheduled mwticipal ekction on November 5, 2013 • proposed ballu1 q•1estion regar<liug official
dcsigru;tion of Park property in the City of Englewood, to read as folio\\~:
Shall the Englewood Municipal Code of the City of Englewood , Colorado bi Amended 10 •
include official desianntion of Park property within the City of Englewood in order to
pmtec1 the pr.ople of Fn,r,l~wood and their right 10 vote on the sale of Park property by:
dedicate as "Park" any jl '\l(lerty identified on 2006 Enilewood Parts and Recreation
Master Plan"" a Park inciuJing but not linrited to : Baker, BarJe, Bales-Logan, Deilvicw ,
Ccntt:m1i~:, Cla1kson, Cusiung, Depot, Duncan, Emerson, Hosanna, Jason. Miller Fields,
Romans and Rotolo?
No
Section 3. Each elector voting at said election and Jesiruu, of vo1 in1: shall iudicale his/her
choice by dt:pre s!iiug the apprnp1 iatc counter of the voting mac~nc er by the appropriiitc marking
upon paper ballots where used .
Section 4. The proper officials of the City of Englewood shall give notice of said next
scheduled municipal ele o1ion, su ch noti ce shall be publ isherl m the manner and for the length of
l!lne required hy law, and the hallot., ca<t at such election shall be canvassed and the resuh
ascertained , determined, and certified as required by law .
Sectiou 5 01~y if the question is approved by the registered clcc:or, of the City of
Englewood shall the Englewood Municipal Code be nmcnded .
Section 6. If ony section, paragraph , clause , or other portion of tlus Ordinance is for •oy •
reason held lo be invalid or uncnforcenble, the invalidity or unenforceahility shnll not affect any
of 1he remaining ponions of this 0itJlllancc.
Introduced , read in full, and passed on first reading on lhc 19111 day of August, 2013 .
Published by Title as• Bill for on Ordinance in the City 's official newspaper on the 13rd day of
August , 2013 .
Publi shed as a Bill for an Ordinance on the C' y's oflirinl wehsn, heginning nn the 21st day of
August , 2013 fnr th1r1y (.lO) cL1ys .
Read by title and passed un fina l readilll( on the 3rd du y or September, 20 I J .
Publi shed by title in the City's officio\ newspaper as Ordinance No._, Series of 1013 , on
the 6th day of September, 20 I J .
•
•
•
Published b)' title on the City's official website beginning on the 4th d,y of
September, 2013 for thin y (30) days .
Randy P. Penn, Mayor
ATTEST :
Loucrishia A. Ell is, City Clerk
I, Loucrishia A. Ellis , City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby cenify that th e
•hove an~ foregoing is a tme copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by
title as Ordinance No ._, Series of 2013
Loucrishia A. Ellis
3
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
/
Dato / Agonda Item Subject
August 19. 2f)i'3
/
Proposed bill for an ordinance submitting to the registered electors ol
the City of Englewooc a question regard ing official designation of Park
property w ith in the City of Englewood .
INITIATED BY
City Clerk's Office
COUNCIL GOAL AND l'REVIOUS t OUNCIL ACTION
Council discussed this Initiative at the August 12 , 2013 Study Session .
RECOMMENDED ACTION
STAFF SOURCE
Loucrishla A . Elliij, City Clerk
Dan Brotzman, City Attorney
Approve the proposed bill for an ordinance placing lhis issue on the November 5, 2013 ballot As the Initiative
Petition has been declared valid and sufficient, and the City Clerk has certified those results to City Council , the
City Clerk must cer1;1y the proposed ballot question to the Arapahoe County Clerk and Recorder
On July 9, 2013, a written notice of the proposed or~inancc was filed w ith the City Clerk's Office In accordance
with Colorado R"vised Statutes§ 31 -11-104 (1).
The deadline to turn In the petition was August 7, 2013 by 5:00 p.m . and they needed at least 519 valid signatures
of Coty of Englewood reg istered electors .
On July 1 t. 2013 , the City Clerk certified lhe lniliative Petition as to form . ~ Yll ~
On August 7, 2013, the Initiative Petition was filed with the City Clerk's Office . tfW,,..-
Englewoo~ Charter. Article VI § 46 .. II the petition is sufficient. Council shall pass the proposed ordinance
without alterations within 30 days, or shall submit same to a vote of the electors at the ne><1 general municipal
election.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
If Council does not pass the ordinance without al1erations , the proposed ballot question will be placed on ttie
ballol al the Cily's November 5, 2013 General Municipal Election .
The cost of this additional ballot question is unknown at this time, bu, should not ex ceed the amount budgeted for
2013 .
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Proposed bill for an ordinance .
Written notice of the proposed ordinance .
Memo to Mayor Penn and City Counr.il, d~ted August 12 , 20 13 , certilying the val idity and sufficiency of the
Petition.
•
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
I Date: Agenda Item: Subject:
September 3. 2013 11 Ci Resolution rega r ding the adoption of the Englewood Lighl
Rail Corridor Plan as a Supplementary Planning Document
in Support of Roadmap Englewood: The 2003 Eng lewood
Comprehensive Plan
Initiated By: Staff Source:
Community Development D eprlment Alan While, Com rmrnil)' Development Director
--··-·
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Potential intrastru~ture and planning projec t submlltals for inclusion in the 2012·2Ul 7 transportation
Improvement Plan were presented 10 Council at the September 25'', 2010 City Council Budget meeting.
Counc il directed staff tn proceed w ith prep,iralion of lhe Englewnod, OtfN ri , and Rates Station Area
Master Plan applicatio n through the adoption of a reso lution at th e October 4", 2010 Cit)' Council meeti nB ,
City Council entered into an ir1t ergovernmental agreement with the Regional Transportati on District (RTD)
to conduct the Englewood, Oxford, and Bates Station Area Master Plan at the February 6'', 2012 City
Council meeting. Ciiv council passed a m ot ion to ap pr ove a contract with private consulting firm Crandall
Arambu la al th e Jun e 4•, 2012 Cr!)' Council meeting.
Community Development staff held study sessi ons with C rty Council to report on project progress at the
October 29~. 2012 City Counci l study session, and to go ove r the draft Eng !ew"od Light Rail Corridor Plan
document at the June 3", 20 13 Cir,· Coun:il study session.
City Council held a public hea ring on the Englewood Light Rail Corridor Plan at the August 19'', 2013
re1;•1l ar Ci!y Council meeting.
RFCOMMFNnm \CTION
Staff recommends that Counci l approve a Re~olution to adopt the Englewood light Rail Corridor Plan as a
supplementary planning docum ent ,n suppu,t oi Roadmap Englewood : The 2003 Englewood
Comprehensive Plan.
BACKGROUND, ANALYSI~, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
The tnglewood Light Rail Corridor Plan project was funded through a stati on area plann ing grant from the
Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG). The li ght rail system represents a major capital
investment for both the federal government and DRCOG. DRCOG has established a policy to encourage
•
station area intensi fica tion including incr~ased employment and housing ir order to increase light rail
system ridersh,p, decrease highway congestion, :md irrrµr ove air 4uality.
Stakeholder and General Public Notification
A total of 1,312 letters were sent to all addresses within a half mil e radius of each o i the three stations. A
total of 705 letters were sent to absentee landlords owning property within the hall mile study area radiu ,.
A total of J,050 pr,stcards wer~ sent to all addresses outside the !tudy area to residen t and businesses as far
east as Loga n Street for Bates Station, Sh e rman Street for Englewood Station, and Cherokee Street for
Oxiord Station . The total number of mailings was 5.867. Commercial brokers with property listings w ith in
the Sludy area were contracted via email through the CoStar commercial lis ti ng service.
Meeting Dates
Project consultant Crandall Arambul a traveled to Llenver to hold fou r sets of meetings to r stakeholders and
the general public on August 8~, September 27~, and November 29~, 2012. and February 27•, 2013.
Planning Process Methodoloin·
Project consultant Crandall Arambul a co ndu cted an ana lysis or ex isting land use and transportation pattern s
and d evel oped a forec ast for regional housiag and em pl oy ment demand over a twenty year tim e period, for
the purpose of crea ting a num be r or deve lopment sce nari os io r th e Englewood, Oxfo1d, an d Bat es slation
innuence ared). Tht: i11itidl )Lelldriu) wert! 1,.Jn:!)tmt ed lu !1-l i:1 k~hulJe1'il dl'j tin~ ~1::;1~rd l µulJliL fu1 lli~ir
cormnt:!llfS and prt:!Terences . Thti project consultant made a series ol refinements tc a preferrtid :,t:enario for
each station area. and then began to combine the Individual station scenarios into a single, system-wide
deve lopment scenario, presenting th e changes 10 stakeholders anrl the general public thrm,gh the course of
M•o adr1ition.l meetrng,.
•
T11e final land use scenario should not be construed a, a rigid development pattern to be enforced by the •
City, but should rather be seen as J likel1· development pallern based on transrt-oriented real estate
development prin ciples and optimal market conditions, to be conducted by private sector prope rty owners
and real estate developers over time. Th e City's involveme11t in the de velo pment of the area is restricted to
investments in pub lic infrastructure and zoning regulati ons. It is City Council pol icy that eminent domain
powers will not be exercised for the purpose of acquiring private property with the intent to convey said
properties to private developers within the light rail station areas .
Englewuud Station Preferred Scenario
Th e corridor plan recognl1es the Fngl ewood Station are.i as the ;ra t.on with the mnsr overa ll growth
pot ent1rtl du e to its excell ent vi si h11ity anrt ;1 cce ss fro m US Hi ghways 85 and 285 . I Ile i:fl al pla11 sce na11 0
calls for th e development o i a Hoyd Avenue extensron to th e west underneath the light rail tracks and Santa
Fe Drive and over the South Platte River in order to open up a signiiicantly sized, under-utilized ar~a for
transit-oriented housing redevelo pment. The pbn also callt for significant intensification of the area
immediately surrounding the station in the form of housing developments above existing park-n-Ride
fa cilities, as well as th e deve lopment of a hotel next lo the station plalform . Finally, the plan calls for the
eventual transformalion of the areas east o f the immediate station area (Inca Street to Br oadway), centered
around a park block corridor that would credte a hif!hl y auractive amenity drawing offic e, l'e tail, Jnd
hou~ing demand, struLlur ed in a 1110,e urban format.
Oxford Station Preferred Scenario
The rnrricior pl;m projec ts 1he Oxford Strttion area as prim aril y rPsiriPnl ia l in nat tirP. rfue to its relative lack of •
vi sibility and lower level of access . ~elat ively larger properties that are closest to the ex1!.t1ng station are
•
identified as being the most allractive candidates for housing redeveloomenl over the lung term . Relatively
smaller properties that are beyond a quarter mile radius from the station have less redevelopment potential,
and are identified as areas where a mix of existing employment and small housing projects may occur.
Retail use is projected to be minimal al this location, but may possibly develop directly across from the
statio11 al the northeast corner of Oxford and Windermere. The corridor plan recommends the
development of park amenities on both sides of Oxford Avenue that will help allract a mix of hous,ng typ~s
that include up-scale rental and con ·to units. Without such park amenities. the project consultant believes
that the area will not attract condo o r up-scale rental units . Due to comments made by area stakeholders
that favored the development of nu-stre et station parking for lisht rail riners, th e project Cl)n<11llant
identified potential sites for park-n-Ride facilities north .ind south of O,ford Avenue .
Bates Station Preferred Scenario
The plan fnr Rates Station concedes that a future station may not be developed. Nevertheless. the
consultant look care 10 devel op a plan that does not preclude development of a station in the iuture, and
advises that an easement be established for future station access. The project consultant reviewed past
plans ior the site and concluded 1ha1 the planned employment and retail uses were not viable. The pruj~~t
consultant plan calls lo r a strictly mult i-unit residential development oi the General !ron Wor~-a nd Winslow
Crane properties, with townhome de,elopments creating a buffer between the General Iron
Works/Wir1sl ow properti es and the e,istin g resid enti al neighhnrhnnrl In the e asl . The proposed plan for
this area is viable with or without a light rail station .
Pedestrian and Bicycle Connection Improvements
In nrrler to farili!ate pedestrian and bicycle access to the stations . the plan calls for a ra il trail featuring
bridges o,er Dartmo uth , Hampden, and Oxford Avenues parallel to the light rail li~e . creating a co 1tinuo ,os
connection fro,, Oates Station down lo the Big Dry Creek Trail. The plan also calls (or the development of
protected blkeways along Dartmouth, Oxford, and Englewood Parkway tu the east, and the new Floyd
extension 10 the west. Protected bii,eways have been recognized to s,gnificanlly increase bicycle
commuting as they prov'de a s,anificant measure oi physica l separation irom automobile traffic that makes
peo ple feel much safer and more confident.
Conformance with RoaJrnap Englewoor./: The 2003 frlglewoor./ Comprehensive Plan
The Eng le wood, Oxio, d, and Bates Statioe areas are prominently highlighted in the vision laid out in
Rnarlmar Engl ewoorl : The 2003 Englewood Comprehensive Plan. The comprehensiv~ plan vision
recognizes the attrJC livenes ~ of these areas fo r intensive redevelopm ent over time. The following goals
from the comprehensive plan are supportive oi lhe Englewood Light Rail Corrid or Plan :
Regional Cooperdtion Goal J
Develop ., range of urban centers rhar will serve as r,ansil origins and de sr :11;,1ions rhJt 11/flflOrt rPlail.
cmploymcn~ .ind hous ing, and contain higher densities than average 1ha1 encourage pedes1rian-0riented
ttavel.
Housin;: e,,.,al J
Encourage ,, re gional ;obs/housing balance in order lo reduce vehide miles rr.we !erl, traffic r.ongestion. and
• commuting times, and improve a ir quality.
Parks and Open Space Go•/ 5
Prov;de a ba/;mced c1nd connected ~stem of open litnrl.r;.1 na t,mtl .1rr..1~. rrrrP,1tinn fadliri~s, parks, 1,aits. anrl
greenbelts.
Parks and Open Space Go•/ 6
Integrate planning (or park s and ope,,, space in the J,,nd use , housing, tr,msporurio n, environmental,
economic, and cultural plans for th e ciry,
Business and Employment Goal 5
Recogni1e the unique r.harncreris tir( ;tn,J associated opr ort11n itje5 for en han cing the v,1f11P of Englewon'1 's
commercial. indusrrial. and mixed-use districts.
Tr,1nsportation Go,1/ I
1-nh;mrP hn th th e mnlHlity ,1 nd th e r1rcPs .r;.1hilit)1 of th e rransnnrtat,on .wsrem .
Transportation Goa/ 3
Recognize anri enhance the ·elatio nships between land use and the rransportarion system.
Transportation Go•/ 4
Promote a qua/icy cf life transportation ph,lo sop hy that seeks to crea te an environmentally auracrive,
pedestrian-friendly community.
E11viro11me11t•I Qu•lily Go•I S
CvnsP.rve energy and improve air quafity.
Environmental Quality Goal 7
Preserve and enhance cnviron m cnttilly sensit ive lands and restore b,own(icld properties.
Ne.I Steps
Ciiy Council adoption of the Englewood Light Rail Corridor Plan is critical to the successful application to
DRCOG fur lh e Jwa, d of addit,onal 'Next St eps' µla11nin11 funding fo, ,1ation are• ,nas re, plans. The
Englewood Light Rail Corridor Next Steps Study will explore key impl ementation project design and
feasibility in greater d etail in order lo seek future construction funding for these projects.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The Englewood Light Ra il Corridor Pl an projecl was funded by federa l Congestion and Air Quality
Mitigation (CMAQ) funds for planning projects lhat DRCOG reserved lor Slalion Arca/l 'rban Center plans
and ,•er d ies. The City committed a total of $30,000 in order 10 leverage S 120,000 in federal funds for a •
projecl total of $150,000. Adoplion of the Englewood light Rail Corridor Plan as a supplementary City
•
•
pla1111i11~ policy document in support of Roadmap Englewood: The 1003 Eng lewood Comprehensive Plan
will not obligate the City to provide additional City funding (or projects Identified in the plan.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
l'lanning and Zoning Commission Findings of Fact
Planning and Zoning Commission July 16'", 2013 Public Hearing Minutes
Re sol ution
• CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF CASE #2012-06,
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS RELATING
TO THE ENGLEWOOD LIGHT RAIL
".ORRIDOR PLAN
INITIATED BY:
Community Developm,mt Department
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, CO 80110
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS Of THE
CITY PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION
Commission M embers Present: Bleile, Brick, King. Knoth , Roth, Fish , Welker, Townley,
Kinton
Co,r>mission Members Absent: None
This mailer was heard before the City Planning and Zoning Commission on July 16 , 2013 in
the City Council Chambers of the Englewood Civic Center .
Testimony was rec eived from staff and the public. The Commission received notice of
Public Hearing, the Staff Report, and a copy of the prop,Jsed light Rail Corridor Plan whi.':h
were incor;:,orated into and made a part o f the record of the Public Hearing.
After considering the statements of Me witnesses and reviewing the pertinent documents,
the members of the City Planning and Zoning Commission made the following Findings
and Conclusions.
!'INUINGS OF FACT
1. THAT the Publi~ Hearing on Case #2012 -06, Englewood Light Rail Corridor Plan,
was brought before the Plann ing and Zoning Commission by the Cit; of Englewood
Comm11nity Development De1-'?.rtmen1.
2. THAT notice of the Public Hearing was published on the City of [nglewood website
from June 26, 2013 through July 16, 201 3. The notice was also published in the
Englewood Herald on July 5, 2013.
3. THAT stakeholders and members of the general public who auended plan
development meetings were notified of the Public Hearing directly by emai l.
ruae 1 of )
4 . THAT Citv Counci l entered into an lntergovemm enta l Agreement with the Regional
Transporta tion District to develop a ligh r rail station area master plan In February of
2012.
5. THAT project kickoff notices were mailed to 5,867 residences and businesses within
approximately three quarters of a mile from the existing Englewood and Oxford
Stations and the potential Sates Station .
6. THAT four sets, .. , meetings were held by project consultant Crandall Arambula with
the purpose of ·.,afting a preferred land use and tra 11sportation network scenario for
the foglewood J,ght rail corridor.
7. THAT th e Englewood I ight Rail Corridor Plan conforms to the vision, goals, and
objectives outlined in Roadmap Englewood : The 2003 FnglPwnnci C:nmprPhP.nslve
Plan.
0. THAT Planning and Zon ing Commission and City Council st udy sessions were held
to re..ew th e Jevelopnu,nt ancJ fin al drdfl of ili e Engle wood Li gh t Rail Corridor Plan .
1 .
CONCLUSIONS
THAT the Public I learing on Case #2012-0(,, Englewood Light Rail C0rridor Plan,
was brought before the Planning and Zoning Commission bv th e City of Engle1 ·o od
Community Development Depar1 ~1ent
2. THAT notice of the Public Hcarina was published on the City of Engle wood website
fror,·, June 26, 2013 th rough July 16, 2013 . The notice was also published in the
Engf,wood 1-ferald on luly 5, 2013 .
THAT the Pla n s11 p por1~ raking arlvanrage of or,porI11niIies ior growth along the
Englewood industnal corridor through a strong urbar' mix of land use s.
4 . THAT the Plan recogn izes the value o f park land through the identification of the
Englewood Parkway/Floyd 1\venue park block scheme anrl t~e Oxford Station parks .
5. THAT the Plan p ,nmot es transportation through the development of key m obility
infrastructure projects.
6. THAT the r lan will lead to the cleanup of Brownfield properties and create and
en hance community connections.
7. THAT the Englewood Light Rail Cor•,dor Plan conforms to Roadmap Englewood :
2003 Englewood ·~omprehe;;;ive Plan, specifically:
•
•
•
• Regional Cooperation Goal 3,
• Housing Goal 3
• Business and Employment Goal 5
• Parks and Open Space Goals 5 and 6
• Tr ansportation Goals 1, 3 and 4
• Envirumnental Quality Goals 5 and 7
8. THAT the Englewood Light Rail Corridor Plan be adopted as a supplementary
planning document in support ol Roadmap [nglewood: The 2003 Englewood
Comprehensive Plan.
IJ . THAT the Englewood Light Rail Corridor Plan be forwarded to City Council with a
favorable recommendation.
DECISION
THEREFORE, it is the decision of the City Planning and Zoning Commiss ion that Case
#2012-06 Engl ewood Light Rail Corridor Plan be referred 10 City Council with a favorable
recon•rnendation.
n ,e decision was reached upon a vote on a motion made at the m eeting ol the City
Planning and Zoniri g Commission on July 16, 2013, by Mr. Roth. seconded by Mr. Knoth,
which 01011011 states:
AYES :
NAYS :
ABSTAIN :
ABSENT:
THAT CASE #20 I 2-06, THE ENGLEWOOD LIGHT RAIL
CORRIDOR Pl.AN BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A
FAVORARl.f Rf COMMfNDA T/ON
Bleile, Roth, King, Fish . Brick , Knoth. Welker, Townley, Kinton
None
None
None
Motion -:arried .
These Findings and Conclusions are elective as of the meeting on July 16, 2013 .
BY ORDER OF THE CITY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
• John Brick, Chair
Page 3 '\( 3
•
•
•
Plann ing and Zoning Comm i5 5ion
Study Sosiun 1>r 11ubl ic ! h:arin,
Ca,c ,2012-06
Case 1201)-04
July 16 , 2013
e
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD rLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
July 16, 2013
Minutes and audio are available at:
http://www.cnglewoodgov.org/lndex .n spx ?pagc=i 52
I. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at
7:00 p.m . in City Co~ncil Chamber ; o f the Englewood Civic Center, Chair Brick presiding.
Present:
Ausent :
Slaff :
D
Bleile, Roth, King, Welker, Knuth. Fish, Bri ck, Kinto n, Townley
Fr eemire (alternat e )
N o ne
Alar. White. Community Development nirPrtnr
Chris Neubecker, Senior Planner
John Vuboril, Planner II
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
July 2, 2013
Mr. Fish moved :
Mr. Kinton se conded: TO APPROVE THE July 2, 2013 MINUTES
Chair Bri<.:k asked 1f thc>re were an y modifications or corrections.
Mr. Fish noted that on pages 2, 3, an d 4 the name "Calonder" should b e "Townley."
The Minutes were approved as amend ed .
AY~S :
NAY .>:
ABSTAIN :
ABSEN T:
0leile, Roth, Welker, Knoth. Fish, King, Orick , Kinton, Townley
None
None
None
Motion carried .
Planning and Zonln~ Commi ssion
Study Se5,5ion or Public Hearina
Case •2Ul2-06
Case #201J-O-I
luly 16, 1.n1,
El
Ill . APPROVAL OF FINDING~: OF FACT
Case #:!012-05
Distilleries, Breweries anJ Wineries
Mr. Roth moved:
Mr. King secondP.d: TC> !\PPROVF THf: FIN111 ,\IG S OF FA CT FOR CAS E
#2012-05, UISTILLEl<lf.S, 81{EWEKlcS ANU WIN El<IES
c:,air Brick asked if there were any modifications or co rre ct ions, There were non e,
AYES :
NAYS:
ABSTAIN :
A8ScN T:
Bleile, Ruth, Welker, Knoth, fol,, King , Brick, Kinton, Townl ey
None
NonP
None
Motion carried.
El
IV. PUBLIC HEARING
Case #2012-Ub
Englewood Light Rail Corridor Plan
Mr. Bleile moved:
Mr. Kinton seconded: TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARIN G FOR CASF #2012-06,
ENGLEWO<">0 I IG HT RAIL C Ol<l<IUUI< PLAN
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSFN T:
Bleile, Roth, Welker, Knoth, •'ish, King, 13rick, Kinton, Townley
None
None
None
Motion carried .
John Voboril, long Range Planner II. was sworn in . Mr. Voboril stdted proof uf publication
fru111 the Efl~/e,wuutl H erdhl <111d the City's webs;te had been received. Suggested findings
were presented to the Commission .
A brief discussion on the background w as provid ed.
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
Pl~nins and Zoning Co rnnusslo n
Study Session or Publk Hearing
Cuc"2012·06
CU<#201l-0J
Jul)• 11i ,20U
• The Light Rai l Corridor Plan (Pl.in) was funded by a grant from the Denver Reg ional
Council of Governmeflls (DRCOG). 'The light rail system represents a major capital
investment for both the federal government and DR COG . DRCOG established
policy to encourage station area intensification including increased employment and
housing in order to increase ligh t rail system ridersh iµ, dec:rea1e highwdy LUlll!t!Sliu11,
and improve air quality.
• The opening uf tht! Suuthwt!st Light Rail Line spurred re,fove lopl!lenl ,,long th e
Corridor, and currently a se cond phase of redevelopment is occurrin!(
• Th e City re<.Ul!llliLed other use, for the grant, includinl!I pedestrian crossings , bicycle
connections, and parking which are currently deficient.
• Pul>liL JJJl'liLip,1tiu11 w,11 accomplished by 111aili11g 11uli ces tu 5,867 1e1 idia,11 ce1 dlld
bu si nesses within .75 mil es of all three stat ion s. From that mailin g, th ere were 50
stakeholders, who are peopl e who own property withn, th e plann in3 ar eas for the
Pl an. In addilion, th ere w ere 96 participants who were not in th e plJnning area s
that parti ci pated 111 general meetings .
• r o ur publi c m ee ti ngs were held l o de velop th e v ision and goals ; develop and review
land use sce nari os; refine and review the preferred combined sce nario; and to
re>vie w thf' Plan.
El
Mr . Vohoril provided a brief synopsis of the propo sed major projects for each station area .
Englewood Station : The Plan ca lls for extending Floyd Avenue ; intensifying projects
adjacent to th e station; and redevelopment an d intensification along Engl ewood
Parkway.
r · .1ili!J LQ11; Identified projects include Park-n-Ride sites ; hous ing
redevelopment; and two new parks.
B,11<>s Sti]tion : The Pl an ac knowl edges the station may n eve r be developed . The
Plan does reco mmend obtaining an easement for a pote ntial , future station . Land
us es env isioned are multi-unit reside , ,tial.
Ci rcul;Hio n p roje c ts identified include th e rail trail (the top project); protected bikeways;
and ex tension and improvemmts oi •r e Southwe~· Greenbelt Trail.
D
The Light Rail Plan is in conformance w ith the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive
Plan , "artlculNly :
l'lannina and Zoning Commis sion
Study Senion or Publ ;c I lt.trina c,.,. •20 12-06
Cnst•l013,0~
July l6. 20 13
• Region al Cooperallon Go,1I 1
• Housing Coal 3
• Busi ness and Employrn enl Goa l 5
• Park s an d Open Space Coals 5 alld 6
• Tra llspor1atlo11 Goa ls 1, J and 4
• Envi ronment al Quullty Go,1ls 5 .,nd 7
The Plan Sl lppo rls 1h ese guals uy callillg for tdking ddv<1111a ge of opportunilies for growlh
al ong lhe Enel ewnod inrlus1 rlal rnrrlrfor 1hro11gh a s1rong urban mix of land use s. Fu11her,
lhe Plan r ecognI1.es lhe valu e of pa rk lalld lhrough lhe id entification of lhe Englewood
Parkway/~loyd Avcnul• park bl ock scheme alld lhe Oxford Station parks . The Plan
promoles th e t r.1 nspor1at lon goal s 1hroubh the developmcnl of key mobility infraslructure
p rujo;~t>. ReJliLJtiull of lhe development c,1l led fo r in 1he Plan will shift significanl amounts
n f dally trips from car, 10 ma ss 1ra11si 1 alld pedestrian/l;i q•cloe modes. Aduilion ally, it w ill
lead to lhe cleanup of Rro w r1fiPlrl prorPnres anrf crea l e and enhance comrnu nily
coru 1ec lion s.
Mr. Voboril responrte d 10 qu stions fr om the Comm iss iur:. Th e ar eas includ ed ill th e Pla n
•
are zo ned ei th er Indu stria l o r Pl anned Unit Developm enl (PL,D). Exis ting single farr,;;y •
developments are a non-conforming use within the industrial district. M ee tings with the
major en,nloyers ill th e plnn area arc still in the works . The benefit of the Plan for citizens is
belier a.:c ess 10 th e Slations ; in crease d property values; and more business.
The Plan is a visi o nar y plan ior 30 yPars , anrt is a very fluid document The plannillg
process Is just begin ning. Future steps incl ude app1ying for additional fund ·•,g from
DRCOC to conduct a N eKt Step s Study ; con sidering the feas ibility of some of the r rojecls;
conducting regul atory planning and reforms .
Chair Bri ck set fo rt h the pa r.1meters oi public teslimon y.
M id ,acl s,oczynski , 37'.i!i Soulh lason Street, was sworn in. Mr. Sroczynski testified that he
is an Englewood bu si ness owner and Is conce rned about th e cost of implementing thte Pia 11 .
I-le e,prc ssccl u nea se over mi,ine resrd en lial with industrial , and fears that industrial
bu sinesses will b e elim in ated . Mr. Sro c2ynski enumerated various items witl1in th e Plan th at
he b eli vcs wi ll nev er happ en.
•
•
•
•
Pbnn :na and Zoning Commission
Stud)' Susion or Public H~aring
C,sdlOll-06
c .... 1013-04
lul y Iii . 2013
Zealand Peterson, business owner of 3975 South Lipan Street, was sworn in. Mr.
Peterson expressed concern about the proposed changes whid, will eliminate a large area
of industrial work and whether eminent domain would be utilized.
Gl
Dave Campbell, business owner of 3 778 South Kalamath Street, was swc·n in. Mr
Campbell bdieves the industrial bus inesses are being placed in a ~orner and is roncPrnen
about the future oi his businesses if the Plan is approved .
Christopher Diedrich, property owner of 2946 South Bannock Stree;, was sworn in . Mr.
Diedrich testified regarding the items within the Plan that he supports and opposition to
other parts of the Plan. The younger generation desires living close to grocery stores.
eateries , walking or biking to/from ,~ork and good paying jobs.
James Veno, properly owner of 3297 and 3325 South Santa Fte, was •,wor11 in. Mr. Via,11u
te,tilied he is attempting 10 redevelop his properties , and access is always the issue. Mr.
Veno stated a ;J roject tirneline would b e extreme,y beneficial; ii would assist business
ow11er s i11 pld11ni11g 1hei1 bu,i11es, iuture .
. El
lennifer I lenninger of the City of Sheridan Planning Department was sworn in. Ms .
Henninger thanked the City for including the City of Sheridan in the process. The process
was very thorough and Sheridan is in support of the proposed connPrtions .
John Spedding business owner at 3330 South Platte River Drive was sworn in. Mr.
Spedding IPstrfiPrl hP favors thP. Pl.1n; the Platte River is a good place lo redevelop. He
expressed interest in whether the City would provide relocation assistance to businesses
affected by the Plan .
Jonathan Bush, owner of the former Martin Plastic building, was sworn in. Mr. Bush
endorsed the Plan . He applauded the efforts of the City in planning for its future . He
further testified that communities that thrive hav e mixed uses.
6)
Alan White, Director of Community Development, was sworn in. Mr. White p rovided the
following testimony:
• The Plan sets the stage lo: the City's long-term future . The Plan will be
revisited as conditions change .
• The Plan provides ideas for capital improvements and setting the foundation
for future zoning changes. Th is Plan c:loes not rezone property; that will be a
separate process which will involve the Commission and the public .
• It is not the City's intent to force out any businesses.
Planning 1111d i'..onba l'.om m,s sion
Study Scuinn or Public Ilea.ins
Case *2012-06
Cosc:#201l -04
Jul y Ui, 201:1 •
• Under industrial zoning. residential uses are not permitted . A Planned Unit
Development (PUD) rezoning is the only current avenue in which to permit
residential in an industrial district . The process is lengthy and er ,ly.
• "Rec'evelopmelll of existing or privately held commerc:iol properties w ill
primarily occur through pri1•are transactions between willing buyers and
sellers " "F,mhPr, ii is lhP. rnliry nf lhP F.nglewnnrl Ciry Cnunri/ rn nor u.1r
eminent doma,11 powers ior l~P purpose of redevelopment within the Light
Rail Corridor." Whenever husiness wishes to relocate or sell , the
transaction w,11 be between ti , ling buyer and seller -not the City.
• The controversy arou111J th , , '/ · ,I Coiridor Li11e was du e to RTD acquiring
right-of-way for the rail 1111 •· 1wklng, and platforms. City of Englewood
already has thos e right -of-ways; further the line and stations are already built.
• Any existing business or us1.: would be permitted L•nder any new zoning
regulations . N ew standards would apply to new development.
• The public notification process for the Plan Included malll11g out over 5,000
postcards From that mailing, a distribution list was developed for rhose
registered to receive continuing communication. Update~ we re provided on
the City's w ebsite, which linked to an outside project website. Also, an
article was in the Englewood Citizen. Regarding the public hearing, emails or
lett e rs were sent to those reg r~te red; the mee ting was also posted in lhe
Fnglewood Heralrl and on the City's website. •
• If the Plan is adopted by City Council, the foundation is in place to
implement zoning changes with public input. It also provides direction on
future capital improvemen, ~,::j~cts and direction to futurte developers . All
11 ,,.,ti111,1 ; ar e oµen to the publi c.
El
Mr. Fish moved:
Mr. Bleile seconded : TO CLOS[ Tl-le PUBLIC I l[ARING roR CAS[ #2012-0u ,
ENGLEWOOD LIGHT RA IL CORRIDOR PLAN
AYES :
NAYS :
Bleile, Roth, Welker, Knoth, Fish , King, Brick, Kinton, Townley
None
ABSTAIN : None
ABSENT: Nnne
Motion carried .
6
•
•
•
•
rlannin& and 7.on ing Commi!!iion
S1udy Session or Public l-le:ar 1ng
Cl5C#201H
Cuc #2013-04
July 16. 201)
Mr. Roth moved;
Mr. Knoth seconded :
Discussion points Included·
THAT CASE #2012 -06, THE ENGLEWOOD LIGHT RAIL
PLAN BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL WITH A
FAVORAIJLE RECOMMEND /\TION
• The Plan is a building block and a method of moving forward.
• The City musl halanre not aliPMting P.xisting husinP.sses and planning for the City's
future .
• Accessibility to the stations, businesses, and µarks needs to be universal
• The ComprP.hPnsive Plan will bP 11pcfatP.d ovP.r lhP. nP.xt couple of years, which may
or may not incorporate all the ideas of the Light Rail Corridor Plan.
• Th e goal is to make a viable, healthy community that embraces change through a
long-term visionary pl an.
• The Plan docs not addres s buffering between existi ng businesses and new
developmen•.. There is no dis cussion on the Impacts to resident ial areas caused by
overly tali development. The employment and dP.veloprn ent standards limit th e
hei!jht to 8 stories; Mr. Roth s1ated he believes that limitation should also be p laced
on re;idential , retail and commercial development standards .
• Mr. Roth put forth a statement he wished to have inclu ded in the Plan .
Mr. Roth offered a fr iendly amendm ent; Mr. Knoth did no t accept.
Mr . Roth moved:
Mr. Brick seconded : TO AMEt-;D THE MOTION TO INCLUDE :
1. Extending the height standards for up to eight story
structurt:s to the residential, retail, and commercial
development standard s in addit ion to the current
employment development standards .
2. Adding the fol lowing slatement to t'1e Plan : "There
are numerous homes in Englewood situa ted on the
hillside along th e upper eastern bank area of the
South Platte River. Tl1 ese p; •JperLies have historica lly
en;oyed panoramic views 01 the mountains lo the
west and many of thes e homes were conslructed to
take advantage of those views . A significant portion
of their property valu~ r.J~riv~s from thu,e views .
lJevelopn .. mt in these areas has !he potential to
create a wall blocking 1ho.<e views . This is due to the
7
Plunn in~ and Zoriin& Commi s~ion
StuJ) S..-•;-;iun or Public llc11tinc
CIISC U0 \2-06
Ca,c o20\J•04
luly 16, 201 1
proposed proximity of the areas in tne Plan as we:/ .,s
the fo c t th~I the rail l ine runs along the · ,:;tern
border of the City. Hei0 ht re strictions ,1n
development in these areas are needed le pro!ct l
those views . '1
There was no discussion . Chair Brick call ed fo , Ihe vote on Ihe Amendment .
Mr. Fish voted no; th e character and nature of the Pl an is visionar y. Details will be
discussed in Ihe future.
Mr. Knoth voted no; concurring wilh Mr. Fish .
Mr. Welker voled no; it is no t 1he apr,ropriale time 10 include deIails . Details will be
discussed during zoning changes.
Mr. Kinton voled no; concurring wilh Messrs . I·ish an d W elk er.
Mr. Ruth voted yes . II is aII i111µurldlll µMl u( the vi,iun.
Ms. Townley voted no; preserving the vi ew sheds for the residence In that area is
Import.1 <1 t, but she Is not comfortable del ermining that he ight limit at this time . II needs to
be studied further.
Mr. Blei le voled yes; protection oi view sh eds is an imporlanl par! of a vision statement.
Mr. King voted no; the views should be prolected and believes ii is already accompl;shed
v,it'.,in the current Plan. The matter will be add ;"?ssed al a la 1er time.
Ci,.,ir Bri ck voled yes ; ii is good lo se\ the sldmJ.irc.J early.
AYES :
NAYS :
ABSTAIN ;
ABSEr--:T .
Motion foiled.
El
Bleile, Bri ck Roth
Welker. Knoth, r ish , King, Kinton, r ownley
None
None
Discussion on lhe original motiu11 co11li11ui:,u :
• rhe underlying tenets of the Plan are well constructed .
• Concern w~s expressed on the Plan not including single family residential.
• It is import~nt to nurture the industrial dislrict; ii cm,ld be a larger Job creator .
8
•
•
•
•
•
Pl1Mning and Zon ing Commission
Study Session or Pu blic l-l~aring
C11e#2012-06
c~ .. #2013-04
July I&. 2013
• As a visionary document, the Plan is a startins point which will be implemented
im;re111e11tal ly. It is an opµortunily tu start a dirllogue with bu,iness owners.
• The Plan is only a cornerstone of a lengthy process, but it providP.s a starting point.
• Currently redevelopment can occur around the stations throush assemb lins land
and <.:realing a PUD.
Q
With no furth er discussion Chai .-Orick called for the vote on the original motion .
Mr. foh voted yes; the Plan is in conformance with the Englewood Comprehensive Plan .
The Pla n cx tc11d s and provides more detail in a number of areas. The Commission has no
power to protect any business; it only provides re commendations to City Cuur 1cil.
Mr. Knolh , Mr W elk er. Mr. Kinton, Mr. Roth, Ms. Townl ey. Mr. Bleile, and Mr. King voted
yes.
r.ha ir Rrirk voti>rl yPs; lhe Pl~11 P.numerat es various il erns within lhe Englewood
Comprehensive Pian .
AYES :
NAYS :
ABSTAIN :
ABSENT :
Bleil e. Roth, Welker, i<noth, Fisr, King, Brick , Kinton, Town ley
None
N o ne
None
Motion carried .
-'ii
V. STUDY SESSION
Case 112013-04
Home Occupa1ions
It w as the consensus o i the Commission to resch edule the Study Session to August&, 201 3.
VI. PUBLIC FORUM
There WJS no public who wished to address the Commis sion .
VII. A TTORNEV'S CHOICE
Ms . Reid was not present.
f'lwmins 111d Zon in1 Commiulon
Study Senion or Public Hearlna
Co,cU012--06
Cur #20 I 3-04
July 16, 201 .l
ei
VIII. STAFF'S CHOlCE
The Home Occupation Study Session w ill be held on August &, per the Commission's
request. Chair Brick stated there may be a desire to discuss Ms. Reid's memo on PUD
prececlence at that meetinR as well.
El
IX. CQMMfSS!ONER'S CHOICE
Mr. Bleile encouraged the public to participate, enter into a dialOBUe with the City, and
attend meetings. He thanked the aud ience fo: attending and providing test imony. The
other Commissioners echoed the same comments.
Mr. Freemire suggested Ms. Reid provide a legal opinion regarding protect ed vi ews and
eminent domain based on Colorado case law .
Ms. Townley stated there will be another opportunity to provide testimony when the Plan
:•roceeds to City Council.
Chair Brick thanked the Commissioners and staff for their produc:tivity and efficiency.
Mr. Roth conveyed that the Urban Renewal Authority is currently reviewing development
proposals for the Acoma parcel.
The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Nancy G . Fentorr , Recording Secretary
•
•
•
•
Plm,n :na and Zoning Com:nission
Study Session or ?uhlic Hear ina
c ... 12012-06
r.,.12c,13-04
July 16, 101'\
II
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. __
SERIES OF 2013
A RESO'.UTION APPROVING THE ADOPTION Of THE "ENGLEWOOD LIGHT RAIL
CORRIDOR PLAN" AS A SUPPLEMEJIIT ARY PLANNING DOCUMENT IN SLl'PORT OF
"ROADMAP ENGLEWOOD: The 2003 ENGLEWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN".
WHEREAS, potential lnfrastrucrure and plannln11 projec1 submiunls for inclusion in 1hc 2012-
2017 Tmnspona1ion Improvement Plan were presented to Council in 2010 ; nnd
WHEREAS, an in1ergovcmmen1al agreement with the Regional Tmn1portn1ion Districl (RTO)
to conduc1 the Englewood, Oxford, a11d Bates Station Arca Moster Plan wos approved by 1he
pnssnge of Resolution No . 83 , Series of ZO 12; and
WHEREAS, the Englewood City Council approved by motion a contract with the private
consult ing finn Crandall Ar.unbnla in June 2012 for this Pl Rn ; •nd
WHEREAS , 1hc Engltwuud !..i ghl Rail Co,riJor Plan JYOj""t was fw,dcd llnough a stat io n
area planning grant from the Uenvcr Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG); and
WHEREAS , the light roil system represents n mojnr caritol investmenl fnr both th e federal
government nnd DRCOG; and
WHEREAS, DRCOG has established a policy to encourage station area intensification
including incrc •scd employment and housing in order 10 increase ligh1 rail ridersltlp, decrease
highwny congestion, ond imrrnve air quality; and
WHEREAS, a Public H.ariug 011 this Plan was held by the Englewood City Counc il on
August 19, 2013 as required .
NOW , THF.REFORE, BE IT RESO LVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT:
~ The City Council of the City of En11Jcwood , Colorado, hereby approves the
adoption of the Englewood Light Rail Corridor Plan, auached hereto, as a Supplementary
Planning nocument in Surpnrt of Roadmap Englewnnd: rhe 200.1 F.ng/ewood Comprehensive
Plan .
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 3rd, day of September, 2013 .
ATTEST:
Rondy P. Penn , Mayor
• Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk
1, Loucrisltia A. Ellis, City Clerk for~,. City or £,nglewood, Colorado, hereby cenify the
at,ovt is• true wpy urRcsolutiou No._ Series of 2013 .
Loucrishio A. Ellis, City Clerk
•
•
•
FOREWORD
The b y •wood ~19 n~ R,:,1 Cc mdor P i:n 15 e .,,s·o-,
of •:.t-nt t he f.Jt .. re ""ilY he c fo, ti--• rtde\'c ,op"'"t'!nt
o1 !,r. cc1r ~o r c •.r.r •l,,o rr.x t h',t' .. ~'J )C.lf!> .,.,c p ::ir,
!t b .::cd en ,1na ,ys •1 of ax:1t1nQ cond.~ ens. potent a:
cccnom1c demand .n tho f ut J,e, and know !cdge
of the d ew,lopment history of tr;1nsit systP.ffl!i in
other metropohtan c ities m the United States.
The in,p'ement&tion meesures (p,im erily planning
studio,, engineering, m.,rkating, and investmonti;
,n ph)'1 1cal ,nftastruclure) identified in tho pl.zn
wil l be in,tiated by tho C ity of Englowood •n
co0rdin1tion with t he private development
sec t or through public-pr ivate partno,sh ips.
Rodovo lopmontofo•i~ting,priv,1toly -he ldc0mmorci.il
proper l ie. will pril'Tlar ily occur thro ugh private
1,an1o1c tions betweon willing buyors :ind sellers.
fl i1 th tt policy or the Englewood City Cou m.;'l tu
not use eminent domain poweu for the purpose
of ,edovelopment w i thin tho ligh t r.iil corridor.
•
•
•
•
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Entl-ood City Council
Randy Penn
Mt1yor, Oi1oui1..t J
Ji mWoodw,rd
Mayor Pro Tem, At Large
RickGill it
Olstrict4
Joe Jefferson
District 1
Bob McCaslin
A.t Large
LindiJ,Qlson
Oistrl ct2
Jill Wilso n
At large
linglewoad City Manager
Gary'i.a11
Project M1n19er1
Bill Sirois
Kl 0 Sen ior Manager of Transit -Oriented Developmel'l t
John Vobor il
COE C.:ommunily Oevelopm11nt, Long Mange t>lanner 11
Technical Aclvi-y Comrnlttee
Pa1rid M:l.auglin
RTD. Transit-Or1en1ed Development AHociate
BrAdUl .. ert
DRCOG , Sen ior Planner
BobS,utrns
The G·eenway Team Inc .• Pr incipal
Mike Flaherty
COE City Manago r's Office, Deputy City Manager
4lanWhi1e
COE Communi1y Development, Director
Harold St itt
COE Commun ity Oovelopment, Senicr Planner
Jerre ll Black
COE Farb and Rl!creatiOl"I, Directo r
John Collins ,
COE Pol ice, Pol ice Ch.ef
Tom Brennan
COE Utilities, Engineer IV
01v1 Henderson
COE Publk Works, Eng ineering/Capi1al Projects
Administrato r
Ladd Vosiry
COE Fublk: Works, Traffic Engineer
StHrlng ComrnlttH
Jim Woodward
Engkswc,od Cily Council, Ma)'Or Pro Te,n
L•nda Olson
Eng~wood C11y Council, Ol1t rlc1 2
Tom e~1rns
COE Urb,,, Redevelopment Au1hori1 y, Forme r City
Council Member and Mayor
OonR01h
COF Pl"nnlna ;1nti 7nning Cnmmi~!lion
Chad Knoth
COE Planning .:tnd Zoning Commission
Peter Smith
Englewood T,ansportation Advisory Commiuee
Tom O 'Connor
Englewood School Board. 2nd Vice President
Judy Brow ne
Englewood Housing Authority. CommisstOner
Jon,11than Bu1o h
Littleton Capital Partners, Principal
Bryant Winslcw
Winslow Crane, Vice President of Finance
Oenr,is Witte
Omni Development Corporation. President
UeMe.ans
Craig Hospital, Director of Engineering/ES
Taylor V11u9hn
Weingarttn Really. leasing Agent
Con1ultant r .. m
Crandall Arambula PC, Primo Conoultant
George Crandall
Principal
Don A,am:Jula
Principal
JuonGraf
Associate Princ ipal/Project C:,ord1nator
Jessie Maran
Associate Principal
6renda Payn&
Senior Urban Designer
BiU Loe Land lco"omlu
em L••
Principal
Tanya Ch ir,1nal:hon
Consulting Senior Associate
URS Corporation
Marie Shaefer
Pr inc ipal
Jonathan Hausman
Senior Transportation (ngineer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Ow1vlWf .......... ---·•····· ................... , .. _, .. ,_ .. ,, ..... 9
Corridor Concept .............................................. 12
Corridor hnplem1ntation ... -... , ....................... 14
DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK
Overviev............ ·········-·-·-""'''' 19
Oevelopmenl F1Ameworlt ............................ 20
RAtAil and Comm ercia l ..................................... 22
Employme:\l . ,....... .................. ....•.. . ....... 24
Resi~r1tial ............ ................... ...... . .. 26
Pork,ng............. .. .... . ............... 28
Pirkl............. ... )J
Negul ;iito:y........ .... . .......................... 32
CIRCULATION FRAMEWORK
Overview ....................................................... 39
Circubtion Fr•mewotk .................................... A O
Mobil ity F.mphHis ........................ 42
Pedestrian and Bicyc:11 ...................................... 44
Trentit ..... ... .......... .......... .. . ..... 46
New and Enhanced Streets ......... . ......... 48
IMPLEMENTATION • C),.e r \lli ew ............................................................. 53
lmplo rnormu ion Pro jects ............................... 54
Sch•dule ......... 6b
•
EXECUTIVE SUMM~Y
.... · ,l .r•.t~ ~~ ... \ii ,, .... '
:} , .i;:t
1i--=-~
., '
OVERVIEW
Thie; ~l.,llU fl \l;<,l 111 ,olo f f•I p l,111 ,, ,4 C 11"1/lilfl u t ;,,n
1,l ,1 11111nv ,;:,!t u , I U••t v..• .. ,q, l h ,, (. 11 y .. , f 1,41o-~.,t •Ot1
1n Ci*n v .a , Ue,g ,0 ,1,d (e1H11 11 o f r,n""'""'"'"'\
('l q r (',, .t nd l'i w f.f"' IC'll ;ll T1 )1H,p ~f \.1 t 101•
11.1 t11'1 (kf J I O "l\i.OIIF <40,:. lt ,,n~II 'ill flfH'•II I"~
d P\l'it l o pm@n1 T h " pl;m w,1 ,, l 111 1ci1i>r l tht ri\lqh tt1,1
ORCC>G r ,tt11!1o1•· .. ,t .. l h,11, h11 ~•1 •,..,,.,11 .. 1 t P,,)4 ,.111 1
.,,u :I !hi'> flh o l E"9IP .-. o c1
ABOUT THE PROJEC T
I·' , , '
' " , .....
! ~ .,, ' I ,•, '
•
•
•
•
•
•
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
I ''''' ,. ", ·,, 1' ,1·J
· ... : .
.:., ,,
'•'•'-Lh ' r ,P 1 ._;d ·1l , 11 1 .·.'1 I ,d,,, ,,, t1•1> •· r ,,.
,r,d U J lo:.r r\~J p .... ,i .. 1 ,. i' ,,,., ,. 111 'U I 1v.,•:
u~ v r ~i · ,, d~· , I ,11 :,.,, 11 :
v.1 ., •h, , .... ,. 1 r .:, :-I
I'.) h l lf•'I ;.,. <'I '"'' 'j
,,1, J,.
1·,: I I"• ,,1
'l r •,,1 •· I'
• Sitni:rn •1 (August 7 & 8 , 2012)
''. '! ·,
• <-"ot ~•on li2 (S~p tt.,·,b~, 26 & ')7 , 2012 )
'I
• Seu,on •J (N o -_,embe r 28 & 29 2012
l .... •. ' I.
• Fi n a l Prest"n ta ticn (F~b ru ;:t r y 27 . 2013 )
PROJECT GOALS
,, 1~•-•r q 1 ·,1,1 1 1,.•~ •! n t•, !P (1t
\h I f... I• h i ., 'II '" l .• ,If i
h •"f' \ ,, ~ • r • •f\"•• I ., •/ , ·I 1 • · r • , ... rr 1,/ I
'•11 t ,t [ Jq,1 , 1: ~ t!, '
I h,,~ ,,,,, • .,•, ·1 1-, 1 I;,, f •l ;1·
1 .. ,.
METRO Vi1lon 2035 Urb•n Center Gool1
I j •,' ' J,1 \ •I j
Community Go1I,
• ) ..1 1+ I • /, .. ~~ l' 11 I 1
• •''1·· l , ,, I ,P ''J
If-•.·
I t,, l l ,. 1 I•,• f .. ,,.
I r , , ',I " 1 1 ,I
MOBILI TY O RIE N r O OI S7 Rll T~
OEV ON D TOD
,. I .,
f H f G RE.EN D IVIDEN D
, !, 1 I ! , ~t
I'
'.
•
•
•
•
CORRIDOR CONCEPT
Focu1ed •round the ••lstlng Englewood, Odord
end future 81111 light rell 1t1tfan1, the Cor~dar
11 anvislon1d H 1 1■rl11 of Inter-related and
campl1m1nt11} llltian ., .. neltf,borhoad1 thlt
support end ,tr1ngth1n Heh ath~-rathtr th ■n
dupllcatlng or creating comp1th19 UHi. The
ltlllon nol ghborhoad■ In■ knitted together with
1nhanc1d 'active tranaportatlon'• p1dHtrlan,
blcyclo, ind tranlit lmpravtmtnts th1t wlll m1h
It ufer, quicker ind mare onjayablt ta acceu
transit, open ,p■co 1monltl11, Hilling and futun■
housing, jabs, ■nd shopping destinations.
HighGghts of the corrido, conce::,t are deKribed
b•'ow:
lat11-Clty Neighborhood North
• Totally comprised ol renttl apartment housing uses•
hO mi>t ol usts because thert ii little market demand
for retail or employmtnt utes due to the isolated
nature of the station and occasional odors f:om the
Wll r.tf! witter tr.u11m•nt pl11n t
• No short term Ught rail Hation ,jue to lack of funding;
the Bates planning area has been designed to serve
as an t:.tt ons ion of Englewood Stat ion featuring
mu hi•unit rHldenti.JI devtlopr.,~nt with strong
pedestrian and bicycle connections to the txis\ing
Englewoodttatien; howtvtrtht Ba1♦1 plann ingci rH
hos been de,igncd 10 iH "ot to p roduda 3 i:ti1t ior: if
fund irg becomes available
• Strang 'Reil Trail' pedostrian and b icycle transit
access co nneclion to Englewood Station; ard a
l1nlt•9• to tt,e •x1st,n9 off-Mreet rr.111 th,11 connect,
to the South Plotto River
En9lewoad • CltyCenter and City
Neighborhood W11t
• Two neighborhoods • one east and one west of tho
Sa nta Fe Otive/rail corridor
• The CityCenter shopping arH would':>e redeveloped
over time as a pedestrian-h iendly, rniu1d •usv, new
urban cen1er leatur ing significant mcreHH m
em::,foymer,t and residential density
• The n ■w Wen n ■ighborhood will requi re the
cor.,plete redevelopment of e11,itting, low density
residential, au10 -orien1ed commerc ial ,nd industrial
1.:. SXECUTJVE su:11:nAIIY
UHi into 1r1n1i1 •svpportive uses; 1he new neighborhood
woul d ine;lude • mill, of p•tlt$, rmuJ lurn c111d high denshy
hou11ng, employment and n119hborhood•11rv1n9 small retail
shops and restaurant s
• A ntw Floyd Avenue t xtensionwoulct ac r ~!I II lnr.m a 11tn traffic
bypolG!t .snd provide d irect and 1afe ll CCHI for podostrlans and
bicycler.10th~ t1•n1il $\dlic;n frum the west neighborhood
• The Englewood St.nion platform will bt enlivened by new
rcadway, pedestrian, and bicycle acces, imp,ovemen\l and
,. rede,ign of th, t •isti no pi1111a inrn" multi0 pu1pase active
r.p aco anchored by, new h::nel
Oxford-City Neighborhood South
• The station area would be characterlztd by new high densit y
housing bu:lding uoon new rHidantial deve lopment at the
former Martin P1as tics s ite
• Redevelopment wiU o ccur at ,1 ful' block sc3lc cloi:011 10 tho
ua1io n, or lnc,erne111ally ttt 11 pan.el s.:.ale, mlAing with ti"ii.ting
busintnH, and 910: ,rally located beyond o ne quan•r mile
from the station.
• i wo nei9kbor"ood parlcs one 1hat is conn•cted to and
enl3191t• 1>,e City P.ec,eation facility, and tho 01h•r locat•d
along Na vaJO StrHt et Quincy Avenue
Rall Tull
• A. pede11rian and bike recreation rout11 parallel to light rail
tracks frorr Amhem Avenue to the Sig Cry Creek Trail south of
Layton Aven,,e prO'lidH a safe ind direct conntc:tior btiween
all neig hborhoods: grade sepit111ted MW hricige r.rossings
provide sn ess fro o acce,~ .:icroGG m.:ijor ilft~ri.il roadw.sy1
• South Place River Tra il rou1es trom Floyd and Dartmouth
provide ,ecru to desirable regional recrtattOn amenities and
an u isting bicycle commuting route to downtown Den\ler
Complete Streth
• "Protected bfkowJy' l >op along Q,ilord. Clark•on and
Oa·tmuuth link!. :.liti.Jni. to residential 1"1elg hb0rhoods and
e11,i1ittn9 employmen1. commerc•al and school destin11ions
• Englewood Parkway/GirardAvenut would strve II the primary
eait•w~n k,c;iil 1,....,,it shunht hu!i 11nd b i::yde connection
be1weon ,ho Sv.edish Hospital campus and 1h1 Englewood
Stdti u11 . Fulluwin y tl1w ~orn pli,tion of 1he Floyd l;~t•nsion, the
shuttle route would be e•tended to the W'!St nelghborhood.
CORRIDOR CONCEP1 '
E r.J .,Lf.W f1()("1
(.!1 'I \I tGHBO G!t <O O O
W l:51
01'ro ~:,
(11 f NEIG"180 ~h(H."\(J
S.'.)\l lH
CORRIDOR IMPLEMENTATION
•
Corrklor implementation requil'H commltmet1t
to fgame-ch•nging' public projects that trigger
1ub1tantl1I private lnvHtment, and lncrt111
tr...it rldorlhlp
The implemenlal ion projects indicated below
represent 5tation area 'game changers' whic" are
the essent ial pllbl c projects required to stimula ~e
,ignificant private inveurient within the corridor
and in,pra,e community-wide acceas to transit.
Th e return on 1nvo~1n::,;,"";: 1.1tio, corridor•wi do, i~
likely to u~ $iy11 lfo.a11l. The INVESTMENTS •nd
Br:.NEFITS d fagr,m on the r ight illustrates the
am?t.ntof publtC invest 'Tlents ($123,750,000) that if
spent, ls anticipated to stimulate substantial priva te
,n·,estmen: (S2.27S.000.000l For every one dollar
of public investment an expected e ig ht••n and a
half dollars or private in...c5 tm0nt would lilcely be
generated.
Additiona lly. i t is estimated that investments in
public infrastructure such as the rail n ail, protected
bikeways, and linear park promenades will increas•
new trans it ridership to upwards of 15,000 trips a day
and th@ ;mnual ec onomic stimulus, by sub5fituling
some auto trips for wal!icing and biking, w in likoly be
$31.7 mill ion o year .
14 UCiCUTIVi 5UMMAJtY
IN /• STr,11 PJI ,dlll 1 1 ,JI' 11',
INV£S1M[NI
• P11btic S l•.,.•t•d 112:1.710,000
• Pr :v■te S ltl1nulated H,275,0CI0,OOO
IHVISTMINT RATIO $1 Public lo $11.S Privtto
RNlfl15
• NewHoltllftl
• New Employment lldg, Area
• ,._ R•t1ll & Comm . Ilda, Ana
l ,150Unltt
1,235,000 SF
llS,OOOSF
• New Job■ C&n,pao,..t & letaill 6,900 Jobs
• New Tnn■lt RIG•nhlp 1S,0OO TripllD•)'
(2K of Trip■ CHI tt1n ■lt»
• Anft'Jal Economk Sti~l111
(Corridor Wld•J
$31,675,000
• .it'~--., • AJ 0 . . -: ~
•
•
• < I
f'! •..J • ~ ' ,,yr;• .
•
\
DEVELO~E~T
FRAMEWOR~
'· \
OVERVIEW
lh& develo pmo nt f 1ame w o1~ provlO "i •o r the
t h ,:-t1 Acte 1, type ,.rr;u 19 en1e>nt itf'd 1n t to n:t1ty o f /~,,d
,11,,c s ff), ~ho,1 .:1nd loo,g u,r m d .,,o lo p ,"1 41-nt wil ~ln
t h,-C'-H d dr,~ h I{, b a 4--.ti o n h r t o rs th,1 t ,nll u-,nced
t ht> drnlgn local dt!1no9,·a,>h ,r:.,;. ,1 d ~t ,e,,1m 111.11ion
~, St l'lfion f )'PtlS: blll!i.fld 0" thtt \pttclfk !i litllOI\ '""·'"
find the fund•mentttl redl ♦1 tate d11v 1tlopnu:t nl
t o q u ,t1!m &n t f.
II • • • • •, • 11 .,., ,
... ,,,,,...j •,•,•·.•·•····•I•· I ·1h -,-.•r
.. ,. • J: i ·' ,1 r r ' , • ,.
I I h,,11, ,'-t-~ 1d1 .... 1· ,:,,.. f '""'l H :'" I "
• ,i. • .. ;,,' 't ,•.,1 r;r •., .. ,·! n ~ n p, l'' ,,~Jn
• ,., ,·,1•,dt••,1 ,,1, 11 1 ,h(J1·d• flu·',· , 1,;,r
·I •r ·,1•1· ,'l t!"" (11>114'1 '.,. "'n \\.''"Oh" l-r-1 r,w, ... ,'\,;
N t•1 •''i..,n I, ', •)IIJ I O f •• l .1, 1''
·• , .. , ·:I'd •' I
.J 1t-,
O ,d or d S1,1t 100
,.,
,f,,'
I' .
'• 11 1 , .,
•I ,,
F • ,, '
•
Englewood Station
•
•
•
•
DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK
The d1v1lopm1nt fr1n,.1work locates tr,nalt•
1upponlve r11ldentl1I •nd employment u111
that capltalln on th• corridor·• opan ,,..,. and
recreational amenities, proximity to Downtown
Entlewood, and the region ■! tran1ltand n>1dway
n■twork .
The Ocvclopmont F,.1mowo,k :
• Identifies redevelopment of 'soft parcels' (va :ant,
under-utilized parcels)
• Est ablishes transit supportive density, fOfm , and
character of development for a 20 -year plarning
hOfizon
• Suggasts i~cremental transit-support-ve inf;II for
parcels where stable, ,1uto,oriented uses currently
ex.st
• Indicates primary land uses and a ve"ical mix of uses
where economicelly viable
• Reflects fundamenta l real estate siting
requirements
• Protects and supports existing land use, (existing
uses can remain in plctce and will only redevelop
with the property owner 's consent)
LAND USE SUMMARY BY STAIION NEIGHBORHOOD
BMI', < 11'1 Nfl<,flfl<lflff (J()[J Nllf/111
llndU••
P11h/Opt:n Spece
Det11ily rDUI.ACJ
lnltn1,t1l~AJt)
JSDU/AC:
Dwelling Un lH tl>UI
r1tlitlg )pacee(SP)
600:,U ... s,
[l'!l,ll'N(J(lll l ll '/l I NIii! ,~Nil I IIY N' ll,I IIHlHI IIHlll WISI
h1iJU•• O.ntit1(0UIAO
lntttnitytFARI
Hov1ing 15flS/1C0OUIAC
Hatti
R111 il
Comme rc ia l
Emplo1,nwi1 C.!110 1.SFA.R
P,ik'1Qpe,n $p1(1
O>:lllllll l fl'/ ~JTIC,lfl\llRl l<HlfJSOlllll
R111 il
P11blOpen Sc,1(e
P11k•N·Rid1
0.Mity (DU,ACJ
ln1m11tylFARI
fSDU/AC
Dwt.•lling Units !DU)
P11kin9 Sp1u1 (SI')
•1000u
J100SP
2SOOU
BOS P'
l .ASO SP
0-Dlng IJni11fOUI
Parking 5pa,e1 ISP't
3'500U
l230SP
lot1I Are, b11,/se
1$quar• F••' or .6er•\)
.2SAC
TotaiArHbyUH
f5qu1H fNt Of A(ros)
21!,000 SF (9 101.1nd 11001)
100.000 SF (9101.Jnd noo,1
1,21S,OOOSF
IIAC
f011lAr•1:,YUH
(Sq1A11 Feet or Ae,1l)
20 DEVELOPMENT -=RAMIWORI<
•t -,"
1· 1 .......... ,
t':·II ·~-l N. ~ .. :.., ..
~ . ,. .. ,. ....
t'.N G tfWOOD
(l1 Yrf N H I?
•
I\
•
RETAIL AND COMMEMCIAL
Over tht ne•t 20 )'Hf"I, currant ■uto-orltl\ted 'big-
bol&' r'9tllll 1ren wUl be transformed lt1to pedestrlan-
(rltndly, 1tre•t~rlented r11t1II districts.
A. lull rMgt of goods and service, including grocery
stores. restaurants ,and bants are erwisio nod within the
Corrido r. The retail district is onvis:oned to provide:
• A ric h mh~ of both nationol rotoilo,, and local
•n ~c:ha nu,. The Pldn fnclude~ d rc1119~ ol s,itvs that
can meet the needs a :,dvarie t y of tenants
• Essent ia l goods and services 101 r1ts1dents,
employM!I, .,,.rl visitors of the Corridor ~tlltion arftas .
Th i~ will ro,uh in a roduction of trips to rotailcontor~
outs.ida 1he diwlct and will, H a re1 uh, creato an
econormc divid e nd for local me,ch,:>n ts
• 18 ho urs of daily act il/ity which wi ll increase
ne1ghborh0od safety by ,mproving pauive
surveillanc•• ••yH on tht 11ation frH'
Englewood CltyCenter Retell & Commercial
o ..-er a 20 '/ear planning horiion the cur re nt big box,
auto-oriented CityCenter shopping development will
transition into a new urban mixed uH retail d istrict.
• Nor1 uses will bo oricntod along oKistlng and new
streets.
• Re1ail uses (businesses thz:1 engage in the ule of
merch1ndi,e. food. drirk and entertainment) will
hftnefit from iru:r11asP.d ,utn rtrivfl!•by vi,.ihility frti m
Englewood Parl.:way arid •cceuib lity from Hampden
Avon1Je ,md Floyd Avenue
• Generolly, re1ail uses will be localed along east •
west streets and commercial uses (businesses that
engage in the sale ol 11rv1ces) will bt located on
no,1h -south ,treo ts
• Alcng a new Englewocd Parkway park block amenity,
building frontages are envis ioned to include •etail
shops a nd resuuranls aggregated continuously
edge-to-edge without interruptior a~ the ground
floor of all new buildings
• Wher e ~0111ble, buildings may be repurposed or
remodeled into 'urban format ' 110,es
• ht1il U$H v.ill roqu•re consid1tr1blflll parltif'g. A
now d fo trict-sorving, muhi-Gtory p.irlting ctructuro
wi1h gr ound ~uor unail space is envi!liun~U dl t :1~
intersection of Elat• and Floyd
22 DIYELOPMINT FRAMEWORK
Oxford Station Cofflfflerdal
Commercial use! are primarily envisioned along
W indermere Street fronting the OAford Station
platform.
• Ccnvonienco se,vicec ,1nd retail chopo such .is
1tt)lau1ct0ts, altts, hdi1 ~lonli, d,y deaners, banh
or daycare centers ere-envisioned here
• Ground-Aoor, streot or,ented comme,cia l stcre•roits
,;hould be integrated tnto t he ground iloor of
residential development
Addit i onal commercial storef•onts should be
encouraged along busy streeh where curbside
parking will be available.
Englewood West Nelghbomood Commercial
The specifit location of neighborhood -,ervin g
commercial will be determined bye nie,ter developer
when the Ccrr idOf Plan is refined ln lhe lu,ure. The
neighborhood commercial should be:
• Centrally located. within easy walking dist1nc~ of 111
in the neighborhood
• Meet essential real estate site requirements-along
a busy s!reet with good vis iblllty from passing cars-
with adjacent curb~ide parking
• Street oriented
• Small in cumulati\t area (It should not create a
competing center to the CityCenter district)
llfVI I O"MI NI SIIMM/\IU
Englewood cn,c-r
Sntt Oriented lauiJ
StrNt Oriented Ccmmardal
Englewood City Ntlghbomood Wort
2,s,DOO SF
100,DOO SF
Ntlghbortlood Commtrci,I• 30,000 SF
Oxford City Neighborhood South
Station Commercial 10,000 SF
• Tho 1p•cilic louti°" of no l9hbo1hood rct,1il hn rwl
"•"" d•tPrmined but ,h:n1ld tM, •a~r•r,at•d i r, "'" .,.,-..-
1h,11 p1ovide\ suHicitr,I ,1ccns .lnd drive -by u •llii: and ,,
well kK1ltd 10 conve:,ieitly serve res,denll.
J.(uta1I nd C.o rn 1n .. ,,:1 ,1I
-
• ~-... ··-. ., •• t •. ··-·
1 •.. ~ .-ff ,,. 1o
l 1.••-o11-•••• ... ,,. ..
"'-◄►
t n g lQW o:,d (,ty
"-1oJ 1yhbo ,hQod W n .. t
C.o mrn 1:1,r<ial
...... ••OOHO O 00 ·,.,.
'•, .
• • .j --:.~•-______ ...:...._
Ett y l,..~ood ,c1,>C.,.11t oiJ
=l'.,\i:ll">l.llUJ:• •
___ .,.,...._. t St,.•oi\ !"...ri,~nud liot,.,!
,md Com"J\Mc-,•l
I
•
•
•
•
EMPLOYMENT
A vorloty of omploymont opportunltlH are
envl1loned throughout the corridor. A new
tr1n11t•1upportlv• employment district 11
er,v isioned for the Englewood Station 1r•• 1lon51
Hampden ind Dartmouth Avenues .
Ham.,.ion Avenue lmploymont Corridor
Lining bolh si dH of Hampdon Avonuo, n 'hoahh
Jnd wel1neu' office dit:tr •cl con1i 1ting of corporate
hudqu1rt1r1 •nd of ou suitH for medlc1I, b1nld ng ,
tech"lology, fin,1,ncial, I.av., engineeri ng, ;and other
p·of111ion,1I use, it envis ioned. The d istti:t:
• Strl!'ng thttns ciucJ build~ upon eabting 0H1ctt l owur
..ant.I rn icJ •riH l,uih.ling~
• Provi des highly desira ble si tes wilt-good 'addresses'
(high vis ,b i1ity and euy access) on a maJOI arterial
roadway
• Envisions tc be competitive with suburban Class A
office districts. such as the Denver Tech Center
• Provides new emplo'lment sites for uses that may
ben~fit from ~ro1e imity to the C1ai9 and Sw<!d isli
Medical Ceriters. easl of Broadway
• Envi1o 1ons redevalopment of th• current Sports
Authotil'I parcel1, into a grHn cor pora t• c,mpus.
R~evelopment of th• ,lte would contist or mid•ris•
building,, ,1 ():tr lung strucrure af\d private sports
f10lris ;in d othP.r fa cili lte'i
• Offers acceu to-de~ireble employee amenities-the
Englewood Porkway park bloclr.:1 and retail and
i;:o mmercial uses
Incremental Employment/Hou&lng Mia A,..H
E,tisting industriill , m.:1 nu f~c turino and Willreho,1sing
uuHare, nr.i t transit supporti ve bll!CA11\A they 91tn,mllly
h.Jve fe w emp kiyPP5pPr h 1fliiina"' ,1nc1 ho'tYft nrwtr.i.!ion,1 1
r•qotfemenrs thi\t .1rP ve h•rlP, rlepAncfont, whkh 1s ,1t
odd! with a TOD pedestria r -oriented environment
N11v111thA1,i s s , thAn areas include man:, uses that
a,e viable, diF,cult 1, re,locatt and provide important
servi ces for the commcnily. Thtse uses should
remain as long as properly owners desire. Where
redeve lopment does o ccu,:
• Now hansit -support ivc (h igh ,'\umbor of iob1,)
,ndu!.lriJI or ,c,vkc b1,;sinoG1:o, ara enccu,aged,
f1rst:mdforer,io,1
U DEVELOPI\IENT FUMEWORK
• Where change or use occurs , mult i-family
develoµrmn1 t (11u rn 11timu111 dt!11~ty) will Litt 1t!quiitfU,
Single f1m~y d1tvelopmvrn ,huulc.J b4, prohibiutd
• Adaptive reuse of existing structures is
encouraged
• Development is envisioned to occur a: an Incremental
parcel-by-parcel intensity. As such, consideralion of
adjacent e xisting indu strial use (notle, odors, etc,)
shoU,d be considered. Butlering, setbacks or other
considerations that minimize impact to both uses
shoU,d be explored
Dartmouth Employment District
New industria l, manufocturin~ and warehous in9
uses aiong with olfice development Is ervisioned
along Da rtmouth Avenue . Tht new emplo\•ment
develooment:
• P,ovittA~., .!iitP. for ;nrtu,rri ,,I 11.!iP.I tn relnr11t~ ;\W/IIY
fro m Cnrridn, lnm1mPnl;1I Fmplo)mtmt!Hnus,ng
A r1tas whiltt rAm-1inlng in Fnolttwond
• r ro~ides II bufler between the planned new
residentiol nci9h borhood ond tho <,M.ltt lng industrial
and lrectmen1 pl1n1 uses nor th of Oortmouth
• Include t -i story buildln91 lining Dartmouth with
park in g end load ng areas behind
• Should de...elop u I green campus-like setting
• Include screening and l1nd1upt buffering
betVie an the employment uses and residontial
areas
NI W IJI Ill i lll'lvll NT \l,MM1\HY
... -C:ltyC-
Offlce 1,600.000 SF
lflalewood Oty Ntlghbomood Welt
U9hl lndu ..... l a OHie, 350,000 SF
•
•
RESIDENTIAL
Four new tran1lt-1upportiv• housing neighborhood,
n IIWfsloned within th• corridor providing for I mb<
of high ond medium donllty housing of market rote
and affordabt• \lnlts with apart,Mnt, condominium,
and townhome building typn.
lngl•-od CltyCenter
Redevelopment of the CityCenter parcels is envisioned
to include
• R11rh,vnlnpm,mt nf P.IC iJting hig-hnx r.ommf!tCiill
p;irr:els fro,n Bro11dw11~ to Elati into high-density
(S ·b stMy mini'1'lum) apart ments and condo
housing . Buildings would irdudft ground-floor
retail and commtrcial uses with park ing located
belo"N grade 'Texas Doughnut' liner hoosing
(buildings surrounding pa rking uructures} should
be disccuraged in order to conform buildings to the
short block faces and den\e grid network la ,d out
as the vi&lon for the plan
• Joint venture redevelopment of the current RTO
Park-N-Ride sire. The e,cisting paril,.n .rid• usa could
remain iilt grade. Apartments (3-4 story min.) iilnd
resident perking is envisioned to be b1.1ih above
• J oint vttnt1.11t! ctportm~11t f11Ju!>i11~ Olit11 tht! e11i:it i11g
Ci¥i, Center parking 11ructure. Senior housing or
t in,ilu low ptirklng need, ,ou)irg is en,ouraged:
shared parking should be e11.plored
Engl•~-City Neighborhood Wnt
A mi" of high and medium density muhi•slory (3
story rrinimum) apartments, ,ondos and lownhomes
orie'lted toward or wi -:hln easy access to new park,
and the South Platte Rive, 1s envisioned. The housing
district should·
• Include rlevelor,m~nt Agreements rhi:1t require
numerous builders and designers lo ensure
arc►,itectural ¥ariety ra1her than a 'cooki1-cutte,·
monocuhu,e of similar buildings constructed by a
single builder
• C:rc.atc a 'mbod incomo' neighborhood, offering
both rcnt.:11 and home owncr!.hip oppottunitie,. A
target riiltio ol l aHordabl• unit to every 4 m1rket
rate ,mil would be ideal
• Dlstr1bu1e affordable unia 1h1oughuut tu .tvuid d
conc~mra1 lon of loYII income uni1s
Oxford-Qty Nelghbort.ood South
Rodovelopmont of oxi~t ing indur.trial areu ,s multi-
story .apartments and condominiums (4 story min imum)
is envirJonod Ocvok>pment should:
26 D£VELOPinE~T FRAMEWORK
• Orient 10 neighbo1hood parks
• Explore joint venture apartmen: development o,rerthe planned
RTO Park-N-Ride;Ap,rtment housing J..4 story(min1mum) and
resident pa rking is envisioned to be built above. Shared paOl.ing
use should be exolored. Ground floor commercial use along
Navajo 1hould be encouraged
S.tn-Clty Neighbort.ood North
Located within the Gener.ii Iron Work~ .:ind WiMIOoN Cr.lno
,itc,, new modium dun,ity (3 5tory m in imum) op.:,rtmont~
ond condoi arc on,i,ionod. Tho dovolopment of theH are11
should:
• Orl•nt buildings toward roadways and new open spaces
• Include a grid o f public streets rather than priva1e drives
and parking lots
• Screen oarking lots lrom 11djacent er.ISiing uses and streets.
locate parking lots behind buildings.
• Development agreements should reciuire numerous builders
and designers to ensure architectural var,ut~•
• Croato a 'mixed income' neighborhood, offering both rental
and home ownership opportunities. A target ratic of 1
affordable unit to every 4 .,,a~•t rat• unit would h. id ■-1
• Affordable units shculd be disulbuted th10,,9hout to avoid
a concentration of low incunM::t unil,
Ill Vi l(JllfVf f-..;I \llMM/\H1
E~CltyCela
R ........ IDe..ay.
Total N",,.... of Units-
P1rtdn9 Rldo-
Houli"9°1;P"-
TAIIG£l-z.t50-
Mlo. 75/ Mu. 125 OU/AC
1. tS0 0...W"I Uolt&
1 Space Per Unit
Aparlm..,_ Condo
Englewood Cl<y Nelgllbolllood w... TAIIGET • 1,100 Un ..
Denlity•
Total Number ol Unttl-
P.wtdng it.ti ►
H0111tnul'ype►
Mir.. 1 S/ Mu. 75 OU/AC
Z,950 Owehlng Unltl
15pK■PerUnit
Townhome, Ap--.nt.. Cofldo
Olford Cily NelQhbomood SOuth IARG(I • 3,450 Unit&
Dentl,Y. t.ln. 15/ -· 75 OU/AC
Tolal Numbot ol Uni.. 3.450 Dwelling Unit&
Parking Ratio-1 Sp,ce Per Unh
Houll119 T)'pes-Townhome, Apar1ment. Condo
Balel City Noigti>orl'IOOd NorU1
o.n,i,y.
JARGEI -600 unm
Min. I 5/ -• 75 OU/AC
600 Owolllng Unlto Taul Number of Units-
Partdog llatio-
-.!119 ~
1 Space Per Untt
Townhorne, Aplrtme11t. Condo
O ..fo •d li•y
N r>,ghhM~r-od .,,lllth
•
,-,
•
•
PARKING
Priv1t• and public parking needs within the
station •re• will be met through on•lt1'9et FN1rking1
within exi 1t in9 1tructure1 i nd eJd1tln9 or new
park•n•Rlde l1cllhle1.
Private Parking
Although trans it is provided within t~e corrido r, pa•king
will nev ert heloss be re(lu ired for rew development.
To ori1ure ~hit rew develo::i mont is competi1 ,va w rt h
similtr uses outside t he corrid o r and e-•i~ting adjacent
... ses are not adversely impacted b )' overfl ow par\i ng,
all new de•,ebpr""en t parcels have been planned to
accommoda1e parking , at the follo'N ing minimum
rati o,:
• Re!>i d entiol -1 5poce p~r resi dcm ti.1 1 dwe lling unit
• Retail /Comme rci al -3 spac 81 per 1000 square teet
• F.mr,lnymar'lf . :\~pMes.pe r 1000 ~f
• Whertvtr parking is construc ted. it should De
• Scietned from sidewalks and bikeways
• Built ocni nd, to the ~i dc: or within build ing,
• Shared wherever viable
• Rtduced. Maximums rather than rr in imums
sho uld be encou raged but not requirtd
28 01.YELOPi't.ENT FRAMS:WOAI(
pa .. •n•'lld•
Cur rently, exi sting park-n -Ride fa cil ities ar ti at 0 1 ue.a t
ca01cit y 11 puk p,riods. At a rt sult, LRT commuters
are parking on-street 11 theOdord Station, impacting
exi1tin9 business optra1 ions and lessening potenti al
d itnl p1rk ing spaces. likewise. LRT commuters are
also causing parking impac~s north o f Englewood
Station at Cushing Pa r k and i n the sumx.1ndhg
residtntial ntighborhood. To mettt park.iny d•mand
.1nd addtess the Oxford issues, a new RTO park•n•Ride
(acility could be localed n ear but not adjacent to the
Odord Station. Construc t ing ,1 new facility 11 Odcrd
wo uld address pas~ Englewood park.-n-Ride e,cpansion
issuos vo i::ed by th, community. The Englewood
park-n,Ride lot would not need to be enlorged. No
acq u·sitionor lmpcu;t tu t.u11 ~r,1 ~1l~ ur .t U1 ac..:ttr 11 µc11 \.~ls
would be 1tqu1red. ·1 he Oxford park•n-K1de cot•ld be
cons!ructed e ithe• at the southwest interse ct ion of
Q ,tford and Navajo 01 within the currr t Meadow Gold
p arcel directly north of the City's Recreatio n Center.
Further analy,is by RTO and consullat1ons with City
Council will b• req.1 ir1d :o de:erminc i( either or t h~::i o
sites (or a nother with in thu vici nity) will bo b uilt. At a
minimum ,oo spaces should be provided.
Joi nt vent u re partren hips that meet b o th parlci n9 ~n
private devebpme nt goals ,hould be cncour.;19od .
Pa ,i..11,9
I GF
:;;z --......... ,i...;;,.,,,_, ••. ---.,., c, ,..-,.-...
... ::. --
···•• ..
.......... ,..... -• .. , .... '••···
J:u1u1c.
lhH\.. N R•d Q
Op11o r,,.
/ I
•
l1
•
PARKS
New perlct and open sp1ce1 ora noceasory
omenltlH far high density dev1lapm1nt. Porks
and open spaces encourage private Investment
ond lmpra .. tho quality al life for thaso who Ii•••
work or visit tho Englowaad corridor.
lhe parks irameworlt p rovides active al'ld passive
1menities includil'lg linear parks, neighborhood
parh, and r•creat ion facil itie s and plauas. The
fromowork :
• Linh the L1ttle Dry Creek open space corridor
vht a linear park promenade through CltyCenttr
and connects with the Englewood Station Piazza,
the Scuth Platte River corridor and the new City
Ne;ghborhood West and North
• Serves both exiiting and foture station 1rea
residents. employees, and visi1ors
• Parks are located as a focus for redevelopment
with in eacl'\ sution area
• lndudus lon!:f•term mod licdtlori :.: to t he µia.u:a to
further actwate the Eng lewood station area and
promote 91eater use of the space for daily and
community•w1de events
30 DltvELOPi.~1:NT FltAit.EWORIC
Ill VI I (ll'M I IJI \liMMAIIY
Englewood CltyCentlf
E~ Partrway Un.ar PaTb
Pluu Enhancamntl
Englewood City Nelghbo<hood WMI
noycl Av.nue Unear Parb
C:.,,tr .. Pffll
Oxlord Clly Neighborhood Soulh
Ntlghl,o,t,ood PM 1
Nolghbofflood PM I
Neighborhood PM l
Ball11 City Neighborhood NOllh
Podret Pertr
6AC
1AC
6.SAC
•.SAC
1.2AC
UAC
1.4AC
,25AC
................
D
\'f •.• ,._
·················•"'
B,.,111~,C 1ty
Nl>1ghb orhood No, d,
Clor,1,~t Pi,,k
O>ford C •ty
N111q h b 1hoo0
~0111h P,,,t,~ (1 ') 1}
i.
• REGULATORY RECOMMENDATIONS
Regulatory chongH are required to ensure tho
corridor pl1n 11 developed 11 ••vlllonod.
Gtn,.. ... Uy. t1 rea1 ld1nur1ed for redevelo;,ment in the
Englewood LRT corridor consist primarily o ! industrial
toned parcels and other use categories that ptrmil
low du11hy o r auto-o,itnttd sitt dtvelo?mtnt.
Updates or ntw zoning regulJtions aro required to
align currentcoderequiremenu to envisioned transit
~uppottivi: t1mJ pedtt)trian-f,itndly dev•luµmvnt .
Possible options:
• Rezone 1-1 and 1-2 ,ndus:rlal zonts to n,.>re tra-,sit
Sllpponlve txi1tin9 zoning c11egoriff
• Prc~c,ve tnc ~•isting PlonMd Unit Development
(PU0 -2) ,nd 1he M ixed UH -81 Ld:-tt ,u11e) dm.J
address v1,10n concepu on a development•by•
development basis
• Replace ex istin9 inconsistent zon ing categorius
with a new mixed-use transit sta:ion area zone
Zoning Reform
The reguliltory recommanda1 ions include :
• Maintaining currc,nt base zon ing and provid ing
new oermitted ust..., and development regulations
as an ·ove,lay'
• Establishing specific subar,11 that ensure
developm•nt character consistent with tke station
•roapl,n
• lmpltmenting new a nd modify ing existing
development standards consi!tent wilh the plan
and idontilled on the following pages
32 DEVELOP~l.l;NT FRAMEWORK
Station A, .. Zonoa/Overlay1
Zone/OV9rlay districts recomm1nded for the nn, .,4-:,,
tnclude 1he following design,tions·
• Mixed -Use-Transit Station Area (MX-TSA)
Designation
• M;xed Use -lndullrlal (MX-IND) Deslgnat,on
• Mbcod U$e Business (MU-81), {MU -8 -])
Designation
Subareas
Six character subareas are ldentUied w ith·n the th·ee
zon i ng/ovarl., district d1t11gnat,ons. Each suba,ea
consists of prirna,y land usts that establish the
architectural charact1r of the built environment.
• CityC~nter Miied-U1e Retail and Housing Sub·
Ols1rlct-Street-01iented ,eta:1, commercial and
upper floor h igh dtnsity housing
• CityC~nler Mixed-Use OHico and Commercial
Sub-Olstrict-Mid•tise corporate and professional
office uses, ;upport1ng ground ~nor retail and
commercial uses
• City Neig hborhood West M iiutd-Use O ffice and
Commerc~I Sub-Oimict-L..:w -rise ligh~ industrial.
office, commercial , and Hrvk•s uses
• City Neighborhood Weu Housing Sub-
Oistt,ct-Medium to high densi-:y housing and
neighborhood serving retail and commercial uses
• City Neighborhood Ncttt-Housing Sub-Dist,ict-
M@dium dens it y h01.sin9
• City Ne ighborhood South Housing
01s1nc1-Medium to high densi ty housing
and neighborhooct-,er'ling commercial and
employment use,.
CllY NEIGHBORHOOD
WESl
Mi11.1!-d I •u -Offk" &
Co -., .... c,a l
____________ \
/
,I ~-----
/ Futur• Shetld•r,
; / TOO On.iopffi•nt ,
·············i
CITY NEIGHBORHOOD
WEST
Me1.11um to High 041-nsity
Hou1in9
0
'•,.p 1'1' Of t.N GLfWt_
, •,.
'• ..
1 CITY NEIGHBORHOOD
~'""'h,~ NORTH
M•rlmm to Migh D~n-.1ty
{•-• Hcu~m y • 1.~r'----------_,, !, ••
CITYCENTER
CITYCENTER
M i x~d UH Offin &
C.omm~rc i,ll
CITY NEIGHBORHOOD
SOUTH
Mo1 d1um t o High o ~M1ty
Housi ng
•
•
•
•
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Rll All IH O MM [lf VflOI' STA N DARD S
' .1l ~,. ,J,tJ l(..,f J I· I "' • I • , I '" ,,,, •
1:, ••t l'''h'l "".fY
•<:;,..i\ I ~\,Ji I !1 r, •J'·••1,,rf j\, 1, ,f ~ l,111,1 1,.j• ,.,,I
I lo tol!I 1 ~ (·•• I". tf, , I •I ,,., ., •: , 11 , ,111 1 I] .,
"M., ,,,11 .. d ••ht , ,• '••t,I 11 I •1 \ 1, H ,• 1,.,111 ~ I• .;I
' f,,,.1 11>•·\, ••, I ,,. ,,,.. I 11,,.j. ,I •, . ., ~•'!, •••,I r•, , l •
• r,11fl'lo,1,• :,.,.,., .,,1,,·.1,,1 ,.,,,1,. ,,n
, ...... ,,, •• 1, 11-,•1'\r .. •···· • .,111, 11 .... ,.,, 11,,,.,' •rr ! •. t
V,1t,•' ,.., ,,.,,, lh.,1 ,hilt I , ·,,, 1,, I•" 11 , ,, l t.,,. , I , ,,,
liil1tllhiitlfiWl:t4%1
\1l!,.1ti• m,,. 11:lf 'J'" .. ,lfln,,.., w ,,~·
I ,, ,,,r~t !,..,.1.I 1,r ul ~ Jr '!ll'>t l ,, ,1,, ' '"
1 ur-,-.\.••1••1t••ll/'l.l,,,1 ;-,.11fr)ff !II I ,
,, ~ind ,.,~, I ,1.-.11 • t•ft "''"\.I ,, : ..... ~._."
·• ,·,,..,1vtt1,I I · I • ~,, •., ,11><1•11.t•,
'\-•\.,J r ,, •l·I '• • l Un,•! ,,, • I, { 11'· •·~ 1n ,
t •--.~•li •t' • •h IU·,, It•,,. >1 !•11~,." •• I" •.11•,I (l,.,..,
••r• .. ·;••• ........ 1 ti •IIJ f '-t·••l••)'"•"l'•<1w••l J!',l .... 1
.1! ,,.,,1i ,,,1 ,1~r1,1, 1'• /w ·f1,1 .• y I tl •nr l.,,, 1'11 In,,
I • ,,,,, ,• '>l ••··t • •>' ',1•, ••'> _.,t,. t, f •' ·o q ,, (•II ,,.,
10,1 .1 •• 11,, ,~.,. ,,~.d .,.;•J' •l <t'll /, •r :hy 1r• .. ~• "•• ,,
1 , ,, .. 11 , .. , IJ , 1, ·~, : ~'I•·' '"
;l-l .1~, 1,,, 1pi,r,. ",·, .. ~I I ,.,,).,.1--i-,•
'~ " it · <If'!•~'.) l '"·""'fl , ·· 1i' 1-v I '•'''I' •#1
IH ,•!ti.I• f • •) ! 1?, '•" t • ot '"" I. ,fll
'" j • , "' I l I ,.,,. I , • " ·•d • -J ~ I
r1 .. 1 /t .. lua,J.1,1 q'• lo,~;',, •ti'\_.• .._,\ '• ; 11 f
t<I' ,,._ I •, J, • 1 .i1 4· .r, o\i, J. ,. , ~1,
t'l.,111 1 ., .. ,.,,, .,.,,,,.,. •'"; .,,...,.,11 , .. ,,h ,.,,~!lo'h-.-!
•••I' 1 \1 l d"'H t ;l>"i. .. 1,,1 ,, 11 """'" h ,r ~ II •
, .• ,, i utd , i., ,•1•~••
•
•
•
O VERVIEW
t~e ._,re 1lllthlfl h -'\Tnt-WVt ~ ~ .. t 1()11•.h )~ n n.,t,\ud•
v i ,;r,1t1pl ,t li t ,c~~to with 1,. t 1,e tl\idy ,1tf.'ll thal
•tlu "A' p l n11 1rut l'I~ b 1i1.yc-h"t',, n1,Horist r. ud ua,-11 1t
.;s.c •Jf', fO tlY4" ou •,H t ly ,; nv1!'"1 10t>t l}' ,111 sd ,r.1,tlv
thJO::L-fil-OUl I ,.._, .;()rt1JQ1.
A COMPLETE STREETS FRAMEWORK
,. J
'·• n 11 I• f 1 ,,
11 •I, t d 1
1,; I ! · I ,. I ~ .1 r.-: ._
• I
•
•
•
•
40
CIRCULATION FRAMEWORK
Tht circul.allon t,.am•worlt identiflt1, full nttwo,~ of
clrcul•tion improvements to ufely 1nd conveniently
KCtH tran1it stations.
• r (.IJ.'"'', 'l 1l"t"u 1e o · :.t u1 ,~, p11 d t1s11 , .. 11 l1•1 ! l,1, ,d 1:
1· u-. l •ti 1'.i' !tp(i'ii'!'ttJ ,. net w,:,r, ,~ 11 t e Q•,'Jled
1"',l lO th (l la11d ui." !u 1111e1-.im Daily d es111• 11o r s
~, (J:,r11rt'l n "'tl ~·•11olo 11,~•·,tur•~ ,.,e, 11.-,•;,(.l A1 ,:,,,., •
'°',1 ,.111• 1e t,1d.,11:1~l l"~1Qhno•hl;r;.d'i ,~ t1r r,:,,,a ~1 ;;.d
• M r urHJ"'\ IM fl tl>•~ V.(, rl l!l31;,v ,,··r(!~~ •n ~II ~· ,1 •11 "~
,r.., .. o l,,,,:,:oJ
• 1•1 I •' .J V\!~ ,111d l•I t /l t h/,:,J !•"•l•:~1 1(;•• '{'\•I""$ e~,rJ ,!) '1 ,a.~,
IC 'f' 1~J(1w •,tl ;,!\1ht 1"'' I\ r11•w 'f.',tt ! T·J ,1 V,tlt l,1 ,1
'"" ·Ai.II• ,,t<; 1~,,J 1••l1,1• P1 11 d ,•,1<,1t '1 u • ,,,q J1tiu d 1ut>d :.
-l"d '(' ,JNv 1:-lo ;•rr•..:· 1 ;.11 •·•I'> t• l•t> ~•. u tf Pl,,:!+• R,,,,.
C"'•lS1i l f''! p11Lle',l'i.1ri a r•iJ L11 .. 1tlu \111\1:'I ,,· n yt I
,1•· I lu w c 1ri lo i"i'l•t wr,,1 1hf:'r fi . .,,,,._4 ~ 0:,1~ l•,cnt .-,J
v.""•t· i ",:L•<; u n t·•e ,;1rt.•e t p(l o;s 111ie ~\11 \e ,ll a nc.-will
IJfl D '8 \/J le·,1
• CJns,d ,n s ped~~t•ta r 1NI ••yd"' tr,wi,I ,u ,, ui ,•
,.,.,rj i ow1c in, '"''T'""''I H"';!t 1,.,, ~')Ill ~\ ,t'P f l• ,1: ... j
I',/ ·p.rn '1>•1r>; ...,,.. T'lf' -.•11•1•· ~1 ,r,-.1v1· :,.i•, .. ,u,, .. , ~ ·.•.t1I
OI'.' n•ev,11~·11
• AJdm!.-;,,>5 ·a r,:1 ,11 y l11111rn ~,r1, .. , v l n,.11 u • ,,~.1.h.,d i
r:m r1d ~l •\ lri r:<l •t,t ol,l, 1' i.• t.11 _u to1 111r1 i a1·•t•w :1 •,
1rK IUdf•c! ., '1 0\V co!le-~10, 'il'El(>l , t hti f l o}n F ·• t t•••~rtll'
ti dt 1,ro~,d ,:'i ,1 ew ro.i Jw.a y <,1 n1c.,··, w •1•·l11cf',,.·1r, 1r 1,;
0"' •J·1ir1"'s:e-d e v1s!,"t O s t,""€!" n11rl t1tr•r •,,~r 110 • ~
• H,1 la •,,."-.. •·,,n,;p,.,,t,1 t 1,.1'1 ,...,,tloJr, w h ,1() 1•1J 1n:,,.,,,, '.I
/l'l'':l ,l •l d lltif'~ ti • @H I 1,,l !: ,11110\!'J i..l~' !tl~o L"'.,'.'vu i._,i;.
•rJntPO'';l:H.'' 1r"p•-v.,1r>,:;"t •, 1o r :.:iJ J O!."I ,· \ «•l•I
r •~) .1 ,-., ,1,,, w,ll .1'"~•11, ,. <-..11 •• •I ,:,,,,.~ ..
• l",f " \ .. \ 11 , ;l,11 '•1-P •.-, !,.\"'"'N~!, ,, I •• !11 ,1 •· ,
"llf' 1,~, 11! •1.1r·~n f'l •t,1 •,·m r!l •IN•,,. ,1 .1lv,, ... 1,,ui..,1,._...,
<.! -~•, , -t ',u k•~i,'I~•. i,~ : I.J, ,,-, • , •,1n:· iP : IP••l•~
rt ·" c.i 1ru la:1on f, ilf""'lt!w ci ,~ co ns,!.I S c ' fo ur rn11 101
cirt u1o1rio1 e e1n~n·s tl rd .1ddit o n ,,1 r.l"'ct• f,,,
1Jt 1u r ty ~t r ee rs ~n d ra tra il 1,i1_ ,o .. l'"' •n1 •,
Mobility Empha1i1 -1J1 11 •ar·/ ct ~1 0 1 \1 le~ to .. sti·,g
rtnd 1l,t\lte n eiqh b ,u hocd !., I '.]h' ,a, ::.u1t 10"'I!. ;t'ld
1~11 01.g h 1he <orr ,d c,
P•dHtrian and Blcycht •, , ... rn 1,, ,; ;• .. a,,rf
cc11,•{•n1t:1 n · !,l ,tltO!l t, I P.~~ II.J '-4t ~:::.
Bu s T,an,it and Shi.ltd ... A l(,i::,, ,·,,c .il 11 tc , h off • .-.et~,,
11 ,t" :,l u ''U"~ ,J , f.)1"i ;;. c-y n v :n1 .-1,,·1 r i ,cfo,.,, i t ,,-,-:!\
New and Enhanced Streets Add,t 1,.11 !. l o 1t,o •◊l,1
(11 c ulL,110" r,anH.t W O I k
t f1t '1
-l>••••••••I _,. •• .,.,,.., ..
-•••• 1 ... ~ ......... -
C?;!J ........... .....
II
"'
............................
·.·! ·:·.:.:. •J,::::' .
ll
MOBILITY EMPHASIS
The Mobility Emphas i s Framework id•ntifias
HHnti•I multi-modal routH to light rail station,
and Hlentlal motor veh icl• regional routn through
the corridor.
Minimizing Ro1dw1y Capacity Impact•
C.J rt~n1ly. aller1 tt1 ,o a r!<. a re ,1 1 c,1p,1 r 11 y d uriwj po,1k
11.;ve! ;::,e•,ods Hgt, t· ,.F ,, ,vl1i ....,es ak11'3 Sn•,;,; I·~
Dr ..... M'l C: 1-h r"J:. ,en ,'.\.r•,111e ,~·1 ar : 1·1•t ~b •t, • .,
_. :t r•t.~ ·tu, r •,1t 11u ,11.:-.:i Jrd a1,d \l ~t:'S w th n ·hr-
,, 11 1d o • .\n~ ' ... ·ure cu11 ,:!o r d~,.~1cp, .. t.1 nt ha'.i thl°'
;iti t ~nl r;'I i n '-'•<trt•r h:iw ;;,,t.1111q n••d l hol,r, f'(!,1,1
..1 r1C1 -1ock cond1 1·,·1M
v\'1, t" •bo r••~b , ,:v c,..,,,I a-,~ u·i J ,n :i •cv,,,~\en ·, d •)
11)' ._,,-.,c ro 1d.v)~ C<.,n c1e,:,on .it a •A~11.·11,1 !e ve
·t" ,r-1r,,r:•,,er-,tJf'!S rfo p r11·.,dr-i ·lie ,:1:,11 ') '("II .,,..,,.."
lt dv11l111c1 k , :11i1 ) ,,_. 1h 1'l l:·1-:.1•(","out! n11 U hn r ,d.-:rn .:ir,
,::pµui·u11,1, '.l'dt:C•-"•" !.l,1! \.'ll'i i\1 d '1nd 1.1se~ ,..,1'11 n
t •1c ::_~,, C:0' .~ (l'f" e l'L ·••HI~
Th• Floyd Avenue EAl e nsio n 'Ventil,1to1 '
f •.l ••ticlu ,,'j f"l•)'f d l\~e••tJ~ ~',':-\1 l tufll I•,_,) 'Jt',..P1 v · .;J -:i•
• Pre,,• ·1\! Er-a t!:.o·. ,(I ..,• 1 ·, i q r1111: f"''-1 J,1 1 r1 '•St,·
rnd!:;,e •c.pme-r-· , ;,-.r. \',P !.i o· S.:ir,·1 ~;, Dr .f•
., ]11,p 1t,.~ nt"!J~ po n,, n:11 1s•J1 •,.,11 r1 p ,:,rJ · ens
W th •n En~lt:'W C\O ,,n,.l sn_,.11d,rn by enabl ng
•,h o 11 0 11g t ~ n•o to 1 11~" cl e t11::i, ·o b ~·Dao;.s
rle1r · 11dPr, Mid D 11 ·r • .,vh A\o>n , P P> r.-.,;.,.• n I n
fe..,..,, l r<ps •I •C .J 1ti ·h..-s,•: •."!.-,~ t·,u\.i c Qn 1"'r.·e J
Rail f rnll Bridge Congestion Benefiu
;. '' t d•, .. •1•1:·\•• ,1l !• •-r •t1•1r 4 ,1•\ .. 1,,.I
•~; 1,-\', /••1 , ),:-' ~·1•,q ~ ,•,ill:' ,\!')-\,,!,_ ;'.P j"\lf J.'.J '
.~Pl!J I I "l.j' ,) ~.,.IJ "I',. :•~ I"-•)\• ,! . ,,; , ln
... rrl,•. n•·.,L,..'1 ,' l r,1 .-, !•,•·••:1;-11'•""!r ·•:_1 •·
r ••:!S1"'-I~ ,•.,!; !l'',,11'" ,I 'r? l 11r •,011 H 11\•~, ,l•11nf> ,Hd
I •• 1 .•l. , • ,' .; J J ~•I l•'!t"'I i!'l .! ;• !. ) ,u'. ,>\r•"' l
.•-.1 1-••• ,.., ...... '
•, 'I V.
~ ..... ,.N •• ,.,,
.,,.....,
◄•
•
i
i t-:: ·-~ •
•
44
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE
A fivo -mlnu1• network of sldewaUu,, bik owa ~,, .end
1r ai k is planned that p,ovidH t•f• ,nd dir ect •<<HI
betwetn tun1lt 1t•tion1 , new development, and
eai sting neighborhoods .
t • '!\' '•I 1•11 • .-.-r, d 1. 1
l,r· • ..,. ,
,. 1,, . ._. •• ,I
n 'I I
A11 a Tn1i l
I •• J •I' .,.
11,1• I• ii•
,. t \:'
,•, 11 I' '1 ":' •·• I ; t3 r ,.,1; ! 11,· , l'!'-;,d.•· ,•'
t'",11! RI D t rnd ""'1 T f 1F-_,:.,;v n rJ! th"'~,.,.,, .l ..
\\"l.,l d r, .. 9r, l•I" .:,, .. n:11 •1-i ,: ·h ,~ C",.-. ... ,,,, I ,r-
W n ,1 ., '\1 '•" ,1 rl,1,,•r,• ·•• ,".\fl ,, 'I ' .\,t""n,f. 1r1 I !1 ,·
! f t l••~l "11,"l "':;>rl r;,i 'l ,,.,,;,1.•d •11~n f'.1r,1 1·1 .•~ "\f,U I ~,
,• c. : •r, , , ~! rr,i LH I 11 1 :,,, ) H J •,., • • /J '• .,.
~ \H ,...... I , II ..... ~, L : · ••' 'I I fl ,\:
-,1'1 l 0•l •·1 .-; -,·-1:l•..!11 -.1·
h•·· .. _1r.,1.,.~, ... ~· \ , .••.. " ,1.1J ,',.,\~ L · •'"l
.. 1 ·•~1 .. •.., l .,1 It·.·'.:-lt,:h i' ... '.,· fi ,1 1: ,',II,.,: l),11 .. , <''' •' l
,1 0,11 11 ·1•1-.i, ,u id l ,1v•111 , A \ ... 111,1• J I,,, •1til 1 1,,,t
I', •• ,•,u., I tt1,., 1,.••·••1 •ud,,H.• !,11 11, ; t•d••'-!I ,J I 1111!
L1, ,t. -~~:, , .. •_-, 'J'}' E •• 1•: 111.J H l,I 1111 •1 ,1ru• 111,)
'"''-'*qencv v~h ,.l.)l._", ,., 1J :~,, ,, . ., ,,-•tt cle,:; ~-.•,...l 1;C1
t • P\'t" ltt·1 ln,, . ·.,•.I: t-r .. q. ,,j•, , ..-1 • .,• ..
r_,1 i la ,:JI•'"•·•· • 1.,f .•-, •• i ,', 1, ,;•, -•
1 I J ,,._: .al . 'I , 1·,, ,-. , •'
Protcct ud Bi"cway,
'l y ' ; ,· ,1.
.·l, 1 .,1, !,, l ,1 ·,1 i ,•.•.•I
:, I ,,L . .,. :l j I • • 1,,1
•• •• ',,,' ( •r _,, l ,..., •, •p,j : "\',
"'
r ••,. .:..•! ' 1 •' .,,~ •1 •i::• • ••r-,,•. ,.,\ • ,.. '' I ':
10 ·~• 1 ... rov ,J , ~ti!,, i" c,, i'Ot. ••·-d , n ~aq,:o ~ b ,...r .-.0,:11
1.r.~· ,,i ,111lt 1 ,11'r,•1•· 1 ,i. -.!, ':J n•' ol h 1.•l ,Q1"l,
,.., .. ;, r )'" '"\' Pn'-'''i inc n!:l,•. d """" ,..,,..,,.n~ er€ ~
·.'!, !1tlS', ',f rr~!• w hi••'r! +. y1 ,1~ -~ · •. l tl!r'I ' y c t"'llE!t 6 '/
u1 !aJ ' t-'11.•,. 1,•d c,l e 1,..i . t.:1n ~ s"\01 ,-d eat "3"-t
!,' ·, ,I,: 81d r,11 t t.lflJi ;•1,_u •r •,,,t b \,i.-. 1~. ,,., •• ,: ;,.,,
o .,,rrr•) •'" o · 10 r, N !·t
C-,,., k •· t ,,, ~n•~"i•:•n ",'1l'lf'' f,11 I •"'I I :J,) t'
:.v · '"\)\•, ..,,. I "1"11 ' til11n n•• <Pi t•'" '•l •I
I ~ ••. ,. ,, , .. ~ .. ' ,)I I• ' "'· •I' ' i •••• ,t ' ... ,:
,d 1tt1 .. i ll .1e '""LJ l• ... ·,.,y,,, ., ... .:un.,11 i · e...: t ·.
ri ,J'".J\', n,,, J.,..,,., '"'eo~•civ, r ,l l"•1 l'd r('i.•e:.
,,, . .i,,r .. •r,11 ,-ci:,ns s·cr1 ,•,r•h rr,.1 '•", u 1·1•111h,
1.;.• •i · ·•d 1•• ,,)la; r h , 'hi 11>1 n <'Y I• r ·•· 1,, .,11
'" 1,,-, n~ bl•, ;'I n"·• · c.i'd ,r,• :_,,, ·1,1·r -,\',•'' ·h:-
·,,., ........ :
B 1,-:. be.,"'· ir d s ;)'f -~n. ·s,,:,n~,;: -"•r.l .. ~•1.0 • • :,r
n, •t ' l -•1. • ~II , .1 ,...,, I"•,• 1f'-! ·t• >-j ,lf~•'!!;
wt->e 1"' ,1 ,,,.,,1 l, .-:~ ~• ;.,,·r :r•p~ 1111 o\o:: i h ,H· l 0(11 }
Cu t h,••,"' I , ti• t,, l , •··. 111 l 1, ,'!)\., V' I,.,..~ w1 I ~h1r ..
·1,-1.,• I 1r)""i •• , •f , .. ,,., !'. I? ,1 .lv\,J , 1 ., 1,t1•·! h l.l'
~y11i ,L1'•-,1.·! ! .Jv 11• 1 •• J, ."rr t,•u~lJi.:>C
,,;, 1-·h •,,1 1• -:o•·,d,· o n
Sidowallo .t nd Cro11w allu
l r· Jr, l 1,-t 1<!",
•a' ' ''ll' \',l !"
•• i 1"'II 11 I "•~l ' l
I, · 1, •• • ., 1 aa.
I • ' : I,
.,.,.
P il d o~t 11 ;,i n ;u,d f.lic yd.-
E.c ,t-r-,~1 _, .. ,
-····· ··•--.•·..-•" -''"•-·'·"' --. ... '"''...c. ... , .... \.., ...
D·
t,:. l•,.•-.."•".., -.r-,Q,._ __
r ~••4~91, •"" >1<.,<fl,V .~".l:t.;._..,:,~ . .,
•
••
TRANSIT
F••d.,-bu, ~n,10 p,ovid•, important LRT station
acc111 for thoH beyond walking or biking distance.
Add itionally. the bus service prov1dH ufe and
comfort•bt• transit •ccen during inclement WHther
.arid at night.
"TO Bus Serviui
r l? cha n'1 ~', I a\e r,r • he-r p1 ,:'ll'<ed ,-:,, :I •.,.
En .1l11wco--t tRl Cc11 n"t• Hr;,;•,co1••1 Nl wn i4 8Ht1 ~
!:i t ,,:1Ur \ 1~ iF 1d c•i n 111•• ',i't..re , ,ln ildlM unal ~(H J1t.e
o r 1d us i rnent, 1n c. u,,.n t ,vi..:ro~ ro1 , cl be m,,de 10
'ill.f' :he -::-1: ,r1 1,1.,•11 11n
Tt •• ; <..1flf1~~i t ' • 'i•fl~-1.11 '-•· n J P 1<(, ,d ~·J • ~ ,',.lJ ~-.
t 1;:q1,•' sc,"0:3 ,1djl,',ll"'l •·•n1,. to rte c 11 .i t1:11 nr;tt1r.r n ',
r-• L,t,\l'S •i,"1 ,,,., .. ,, 1"1f' Er,q ,~\'l"'Od ~t ,1l t\)n f"h ,:, n .. H••
,, ,.,c t1<1:!,.· -. .,.;w11 1 :,n1•c c 1 J1°wll c.•f'aF•rl "• 1,,.
•~,, 1,1111 :·~11 ,0•1 ,c n v ro nnl cnr .i r•d p ,t,'-d ,; •~~:.c rnm
:1{'t ,•S\ t,1 ,1 :1 ilnnf'i ! h \1 f(' :l(! ;1 r nr ,• ·r: 111 (1 ,1,,111 r,
n,., new r ,1.fv,,1•, •.-;d r 0 ru•,p c • ·I ,,, :1 1.t "'c lf,, t0 lnc;i
St•et" ·h11.>v_:1h ·h~ <••1s· n; P1a;:,1, c.0 11H1ul· tlv?J h
·h,, •:~ ,. WJ b l,\,',<1 7 arid ("Q rm 1:C' 1r I -.. d ..:..en .. t?
I v ,:-,.'.,f'.'!f'1 rno !.J1<• 1h -s 1Y1 p1 tJ _.,:,,, er,· ,)polrJt -:in,,
l,,1·, l'"· ... ti\ .. ~• '11 1 c .-\. _;,1.,:,: .,~,·-ily:, l.Jt>
n,,:r,r<;)•\
local Ctrculnto, {art Sn uttle Bui) Service
~ i,-1 di ' ~h. .. :, .. ~ ... Ct ,I rJ:tll l pr.:l\ 1•lr•or. l vC :--0 Si?t ', "'"'
r.-:nne,:· ng ·r , .. "..J '2 'M·•·r-j S·:11 11r, 10 ·t1(' Cr ,1 'J ·
S v.1~d !ih \'1 1:!-fJ ,1 ;,. c, .. 111,~, 1 ~--l1 P W, d •ri~,-, 10\.l~C ·~
j •l;.111 •.-d 1 nr1 :1 ff'lgl"'""'OQ ti iJ.l:~w1y 1(.:, ,,ir(~ S-11 0 {''
and ,ndJdi:·'• ,, hit H1' •"• '.>11 c,,c 1 '(' w, ... t v ' S u 11;! F-(•
,) ~•HI 1hr. r ,u1 n1•d r 11.~d •"~;,:.r,•,i.ir
Light Jl :ai l Station,
• .,J1,•, ,,, ••1• l
• I l••-1-,j ..... 1' .-
/.·
:I l
, 'Y •
Future Bat•1 St.ation :,, · an ,,. th•J So u1~w.<1 1,1
,-.,,, d w L1:.J" I~., I ~li11 1,;:, I l) .,~: c:,i· t t ,1 •\l n h n .. rc•
B :1t, .. ,. S1i,• 0 11 H n v,•'•'t". rl.i" 10 h !Jli 1 0 1\,;\1 J(.1 1,..,n
,os·s ~n d (.I JJf'f<:1! 0 1 a C'b sta ::les , orn b nod w 1°l1
,1 ,l ::k o 1 a v ob i • 1..!"h(•P ' .ate f,u, ,,~q s·,;H c •,
1• c. riot j,l,.p , w l)i• ~O l'l!ot 11.o c t@d <;h ,.a .. ld ;he 1,
,wt.! Rl D 0 9 1-ee 10 e l,~n d o •1 1-J la o s le , a Ga•p•
~'-"I n•1 •h,-r •-y t h,• ,I d p i....1~.,~ .-., .. ,y·t ,.-1 • ..,n~ w •h
P I L) •o 1~0 nc .i1e t br-Bil:O ".i St r1t 1r.,r, ,, .. > ·•l•' :,~s ·~,
1n 1p 1c.v ng pede!ot1 .. 1'\ ,rnd brcycle o n11 N t o ns to
:h l:ng1~'.'m(ri .:i ric!O ,•ord ~11 ;\· o n-.
Potontiol Tufts -Union St.ation !,, r o ~ ,,q u i
.,,,., r ·11 o n , ,r,. r r,.nrflhP r,,,-r> 111~11 ,nn , "'n
l•I U' 1ur•1'.•, t .. , ,,, ,1.t·J I 0 H ll ~•,"I t ~•.,•. H I':-11'•')-J
11 p1 0 ~1matr>I\· 'I, 1.,1 ' a,.,, e !,0,1tb o ! •hr., Q ;.-!o rd
'.,(;l:.~,n. nco1r l.if t \A \C!l•u e P1e 1w,.,,a1. ii!o!.t?:.!.men1
I •rw, ;ve,1 r,d ,ccltt•i t a: oNE-n1 ,l l IU IJ mav h"
1Jlei\U~I 11 · t i •~ h><:,)'•vt• !h<l "l ,i' 11,i': n ,,1t.'~ S·,,1 (Jr•
Andn•,:-n"' <;"<l " t'n .,, .. \ r l;PH'lln J w 11 h,:, "1q,. r~rl •c·
us!.e!-s ;ol) r.iot en: al ·or ·t\ ~ are 1h e ri,p.'1C.ts on
·h" n p,~r ,11 o n~ o 1 ih,. ;,.1n .. ,: ro,1 rl o :, p Ot;'i 1b 11t ,e\
fr I ,1d(:1· 0 •1J1 p 11 1 fl ,,d!.•, •f•q 1..,,1f•d !l'•j)l (),''I O<•<,f 'j
·o '"~dw,w:; ·,, ,1, , ,. , ·11 ,_• , ..... , 11 J'l.ll11J1n , .-1,\d
:,:.1· tJ'1 iHPl 1 l) .1 n1 t'1 •:'-C1fl OTf'1t(' ., .. ~('>';\fl l,~n· ;mu
,.:,: f•1.' fl J'.-~,I ti 1 .,,.J '1 (J df1d I Q r ,\tl,l• I O il ,,1 11
,).:. .,.,.,, .. , T~·•·; U•• '" St:H,O '\
-,_ .......... ~-... ,-... ...
,-i 'T .... ,.. •.
............... ....
..:!;~' .. ~~==.: ~ --
LOC A L
Ct R(U L ,-\TO ~ /JQ1'
S t1 U T Tl E. B U$
Ql.)I 1-N :..
1 1,t l C-, U NU) ....
-,r ;.1, f\
·····••" ·······
...... ,
•I• O• Il l ••• If
_.. A-~·. '• •:°:~ ... •.: r •,~t,.Y l
_./',.M!J/)!tJ\u ~ ,1 f. ·•· ...
~-·JUU:;w .,..,.. "o!t-"'_,.,,.,_.,. ~
.... ~ ...
•,
\
H .
~
P iO I-+
SUS ROVH.") I
Iii
""
•
•
•
•
48
NEW AND ENHANCED STREETS
A street grld est1bli1hes 1ppropri1tely ,caled
developrnont block, and di1per111 vth icle tr.,tf \c
aw1y from ex isting cong11t1d 1tre1h.
rh~ p .rpos Cl : r'I C:J a1 Hj enht1r 1r ud ,lt('fo i'i ,~ '.c:
• l mp,,:,,a 3 (i,.('t;<; t~ :h,. SI-It l'r1
• P,o •,·•rlr> 'or J r-"1l:"' :;I•,. •; ,.~·, ,~,"I' c;.,1 r-011
,. ~r·,l'.!-i • i n • J "'I Id ,.,,.,, 1,,~. !._~, .-in 1,· • ,~ • •11,
• P, rr.•l tt"s SIT",'I II F>• b ,.J'l d ng~ r;;1ht_•1 ·ha11 r· 0 1 .... ,, 111,,
d 1Cr 1.!l\u r~• , :,1JL1 i1 ',->J \', ·I J •': b :,.-r ,
.-:1,1,,1o pruP,rl\' ·c ,
l',i,iw Local (Neighborhood) Streets
,:, ,. s11eet s wt•I b(• c.•.•r , 11..1. 11,d ·t :.1 .. :b,1, ~·•t:i:l
,a,-•.ia,~~: anti .,,..,u,J1
• C n-• 11 .-.c · rilr~ nq ,,!r,ritl 1 I ( ·1·t°'<,
• ll'ltJ \\i3'f n~tc. :1.ivr-1 ,,n~•.,
• 8 cyd efoo1,~,\~ wh,.,.,;, •1d •c ,:P•l 1r lhPp,--">d, ... ot.'r ,.,,
a nd b ,c.yc1~ fr,1....,q-..., -,L
• Pt!tJC'tilr lct11 ~C.d l.,.,! \lrr>r-•l,,1h 1•.
I (3r,J p)!•,:,,--.._
• L,\lll!li C<l l !('• l 1"'1.•b ;,·, •iinc,or~
• S d 1.•w ;ll:!, r,n t"n th •,,di,,; nl •,lrl"tH•, at 8 1oot
l""'fi 'r"l•""
• Pi,d.?st n•m c1on ~-. .. an·• .,. u! a ,,~, .J I t1 n d oll c ~t u ,
!>l!Oftl 1,1(:l!,,(:Ot.lCr,,_
Enhanced StrHtl
£:rh;m r-1". -t 'rN '."'~. p•;h d1.i ,t c.•~nt t,,Jll l un r-• ~•1i,
e ,•s 'ing !. ,c-,01 01 d ( r Or (,,..11Jo9 ..,rl d 11 c:na :iec.1.,·a11~n
and .(y (l1• 'M .• ,.
Floyd Ave nu• £11.te nr.1on
• r 1,~\·<I M,t1 r, ..... ;<, l'b••t!• t(,'n !o,l ,\('I',' •• •♦ln C.'.I !'>HCOI p,;,,, n 1·1e"'d ·1.~:.~•o a,.,,o11r1,,.,l,.veoptT1v11 '
"lln .,,t>~· ,.I Szn11t 1'1.' Ot \1• "'i .t l,~••·"•1 J 11 .. ,,.
•J U)J w ,;:i.\1.•,111.1 IP ,, i!Q: D ,,,.,,,,::,t,!I, ,\..,.0::1,u~ t11 ,,I
H di"'l._ '°'' i\ven:.i-
Englewood Parkway
• ,1,111::-v.f'.\o rl ~'.,1k.-:ay .. n , :u 11 .-.,j w,11, ,, l "C"••c1,-.rl
!•1~(•V',UV J<lt.l ~•d'•Ntt I. 1..•11 h21tKf-t'T'f•n •-. ti,-'tt p1 .>.1d"
1~p r-::iv~<.l ~rj"!.Tr ~r .irrih• <1C !f",l<.<."'>'l bt"'.i,l?t"'n
tliv C \J\..C n\(.>1 ,,,,·1:i. F110 1,,._.,.,JC-rl ~tanc,, cl nd lh•?
B, r t.1dw<l1 r.,;,1•1n,,., 1 r 0 n 1d f)r
N~w ,1 nd Enhanced Str•,,..!t s
Lt t.J(NC1 -.., .. _ ... _ .... __ ... _
-t-•• .. -t ... ,~.
r--~,\.· t~••+...,. ....t, ,._. •. w,, ·~ .. _
'•• .. .
..... ~ ......... .
··• ... ,.
··· ....... .
.. ..... •········i ············ .. .: ..
·• ..
IMPLEMENTA-TtQN
OVERVIEW
I O 1" plvm..-"l\,tllD" r•.quirCIS th,. d,1M fl, 11 n of
f'oJhlt(' ,IN HV\\, I 9nnlf'•d u.,-.oino ' 1110\~l'\ •hAl ..,_,,11
J.lf.l d Uc...-~ ,un.>tr'l trl and wtd1n uatJ j"lf iViH m!l,\.;11t
',j, .,., .,. t ·.,-,I l'M ,-'t-"lt.l ,,,.1 , ,1
/J • , • l \I ' ••• 'II illf'
t~ii, •··.~ ,,hp.re " ., ,, • •'f' J1''1 •11 , ;, ri,, i•, !
1,;!J n !ti I 111 I 11,,. (. ,•, ,, q,I t ',fr''oJI 1 I
, !I• a; ,.., ,..,.1••• ' lf1•I •t l~,!.C •1.;,· • ! .l1•U1
1{.' I 1!0 .. ,,, "• I ' ' ..,, l·Jf'll
·1,.,1 ·,f'h• illl.1rl •v:. ·1,, , " 1 • jbt\•t• -,, "<·
r•• ;'I' • • ~!CJ ' • 00 I • " '' 1 ' ~!
f I
h •·~· 1t'"''""d .> ! It 11 \ ~·· .J 1 •'•'"'"'' • l~•
"I t l~,-J1•~ 'I, II ,\ •
:•• ! . '
•
•
•
54
IMPLEMENTATION PROJECTS
The List below idontifiH p ro1oc ts fo r o,1c ti of the
station •'•"' In th• r nrridn,
,11\JION fl< JJVI\Jl()N
PubllcPNljecll
• Englewoo d Part .... y E'.o.Wr 1s,on
• Pl!!lta Enhancort,; ., .. \
• Station Platfo rm E n h.»n<:Pn'll.•"'l ti
Pltv-PNljecll
• Ret;:,lt St o rehon\S
• Hotel
• Hou sing Over park-n ~R,de
• Housing O ver Parking St ructure
ll(JY!ll\VINIJI I XIINS ION
Publlcl'Nljecll
• Acquire-La nd. Bu ,lcHn gs & DP.rnol,tio n
• Ces1yn & Co ns1ruc t Ro;,dwtl~• E!'IP,t 1!iio11 ,
Underp;sses. Br 1dg,.H ,l nd S,gn;,l!z:n ,o n
-Ploi-
• New Ho us ing
• New Pd1ks
• New St1ctit Gnd
I N<,11 WOO!I 1 1\HKWf\Y
Publk:Plajects
• A cquue Lan d , Bu,1d 1ngs & Dl1moht •on
• Deslg ,1 & Consm,ct Par ~s
• Q t,s13 rl 8 Constr uct Lo ctll Stioct
Pltv81el'lajects
• New Mixed-Use RtHa 1I & Housmg
• New Mh1cd•Us~ OHi e;~ & Com1 11~11 ,.i i
• N ew Stree t G rid
()XII )IHl l'/\l/f\\
Publlc:PlajaclS
• A r quire Land Buil d ings & Dc11,uht m n
• De sign and Co ns1 rn , fwo PJ1 ~,;
NI I< ,I IBOlllH Hlll < ONNI < !IONS
Public Projects
• Ra I Th11l & Th,ee Budge :;
Protec ted 8 1kc1,.:iy !f:n~ll!wnod 1"1\<ll 11n •,.:,
a ,oadw 1t'tl
Privete Plojacb
• Et11serients fo, fold 1I lra1 ! df"d P..1 11 Ir a• Ac.ce ss
IMPLEMENTI\TION 1-'RO JEC 1'
•
•
•
56
STATION ...::TIVATION
5ti1t ion 1t l 1Ylil t 1on projects improve access to
th• s t a t ion ,1r,d cre•t• a mor e act ive 1t•tlon
env ironn-,ft :,t
PlHU H Pih) JI ( 1\
Project Coit
ENGLEWt 'OD PARKWAY EXTENSION
Dt>mo h~h ( ,0 ~111,g ~<."',1 d w&y > 1000,000 Re ccnsl•u c.: Pid u .,
NewRoad wa ) !. 1,000,0 00
PUBLIC INVESTMENT TOTAL : S 3,000,000
1'1<1\/1\11 PRllll< I\
Project Unit, Colt
Hot el 250 Rooms 36 ,500,000
P.J·ld n 80 Sp.tc~:; 3,500,Q(i()
HoJ , n ov e• ?:iCDU S0,000.00C\
frfD P-'"· n ~1de
Hou5 in g ISQ DU 30,000 ,0!lO
Ow,rPatking
Ret;,1 1 15,llOO '.lF .s ,1!:>U,UOll
PRIVAI[ INVESTMENI TOIA L. \ 123,750,000
PlJBI I( A( llllN Pl AN '
Required Stupt
ENGLEWOOD PARKWAY EXTENSION
11 ?1epare Er·9 lewo od E-.1p11s 1o ro Corc@pt Q,:,,11':J f'
1) Prepari. Co r-t rnct Ooc'-'"'•n t1,
3) 81d P,01ect
•I} Cor,~t,u,:t P1 0 1t'cl
HOTEL
':P, r,,,,'i,:t-l'Jr.~l-kl'"l•'·f,,, .... .,.,.,-r.,
2 l,•:J \rf• 0 ~\e (II"?• Q h~r 1••q
l} Rti ,lii",'o )t",•t•l~,•fll P•t>f',1 H \
Who
C,1)/RJ"O
C1ty /Consu ltJU ,t
C•ty /Con!l ult an t
r 1ty/Co ro tr.1 c.t or
,ty
C1 t,IC<,• \,ii• I''
C,t~• Dtt'IC •·-~-~,
C11 •,/Dev,"!lr ; ~,
~lAIICJN A( 11VA110N •'f<UJl( \~
•
58
FLOYD AVENUE EXTENSION
Th• Floyd Avenue exten1lon pro jects include
Htending Floyd Avenue west of Inca Street to
IHer1ge investment west of Sant• Fe Drive .
l'l il!lll t'R( 1 II ( I\
FLOYO !>VENUE EXTENSION
cf\lSF/l •n b r,d ye
C'i t11>v nv , ..... StnH.l uh:·,
Po .;dway E) IC ");tC)r\ &
t.cquis,;•o-, (In ca t r-S :.1,111el
:)c u1•, 1-'la trn Mudg..-
Cost
3,200,00•,
S 4,800,000
9,500,000
1,500,000
1,000.000
S b U0C.00)
Future Flo yd A~o {WP.H <J ' S Pli\tte) 5 10 000 (}(,O
.~ Oa :m:lu l h A,c Upcy.id'° .
Pump S1,wv1 , $ ~.000,000
$ .i,:,00.000
PUBLIC INV ESIM ENI IOI Al · S 57 ,500,000
PIIH I IC I'.< I IC )N Pl /\N
Required Stops
FLOYD AVENUE EXTENSION
1) l.tri d A cqu1s,t1 o r. dnd Dol"'1 Ql ition
2) P!epa•e Flot1d E ,.ten~1on Concept Desig n
3) P1epare Co•n,,o DocumoM -;
.::1 Bid P•o1ec.t
!-> C o.,,~ru c t Pr o11;:,;-t
l'll/V/\11 l'R(l ll I \
Project Units Con
Housing 2.950 DU S 590.000,000
Pa ,k,ng J,OOOSP s 86.000.000
Patio:~ ',.\C 9,000.vOO
Rntail 30.000 SF 7.500.000
O fl ,.1: 35).o oo 5r 87,500.000
Pi.1 ~,n9 1,050 SP :!.500,000
PRIVATE INVESIMENI 101AL S 783,500,000
Who
C,1y
C,!y/BNSf /RTDICDOT
C1,y/Co ru,u ltlt1t
C1 1y/C.>,-.s 1.d1an1
C 11y/C'Jr1t~i:,~:o r
FIOYl>AVINUI IXHNSIONPRl)lf< 1' ~------.. (I
•
•
60
ENGLEWOOD PARKWAY
The Engl•wood f'arkway projects include linear
park blocks from Inn Street to Acom• Street
thilt tranlform th• investmer;t er;vlronment along
Englewood Parkway and provido o high qu,>lit)
amenity for 1tr••t oriented retAil, housing 11nd
profenional offi ce development .
Pl JFJ I I{ PfH l II t I\
Project
ENGL!WOOD ,ANKWAY
L"1u t Ac..qu1~11 1(11 1 .,,,d Dm11 0
Co•1i1tuc1 Park~
Const rur.r l o t.JI St·ce1
PUBLIC 'NVESTMENT IOIAl :
PURI I( 11< IION f'I /IN
Required Step•
ENGLEWOOD PARKWAY·
Colt
41,000,000
8.000 000
2,000.000
S 51 ,000,000
1) la"rJ Ac.q u,s,1,or-a nd Demol,1,o n
PRIVA Tf PR<) Jf l l"i
Projett UnlU .....
Ml••d-U.. Retail & Housing
Housing i'SO OU 'I I~ 1,000,000
Parkm g 7SO Spaces s 2 2,500,000
Retail 230,000 SF s 58,000,000
F\1rki ng 600 Spaces s 15,500,000
MIHd -Use Office & Commercial
0111("' 885,0 00 SF $ 221,0 00,0 00
P,>1~m9 3540 SpdCP '., s 78,000,()()l)
Comme1 :1;;I 100000 sr 20,000,000
PRIVATE INVESTMENT IOTAL : S 566,000,000
Who
2) P1ep,n.t Eng!ewo c d Parkway P;,,k !. and Loc.,t 511-,et Corn.opt Oe !.19 n
C,ty
Clty/Ccri \t,l {a nt
C,t)'/Co n,ulu ,m
C1tv/C.r•u,,,ac lor
3) P,eoare C w,act Do.:ufTlo~ts
41 r:ho P1 01ec1
5) C 'Jl"'WllCl p ,..j,f!'(""
62
OXFORD PARKS
The Par ks Pro jects prov ides a green sp,ce
amenity required for market rate, high dens ity
hou1in9 .
PlJBIU l'IHJ II( l 'i
Project
PARK 1
t ,1l'lrl Ac,,, 11<;111Cir• t, f)pmol,tirir-
Com,ti uc: t Fa,~
PAR K 2
7,500,000
1,000.000
La nd A cq o,r.11 1011 500 .0 00
Co nsfl l'Ct PM~ 1,000.000
PU8l1C INVESTMENT TOTAL : $ 5,000,000
l'IJ ll! I( A< II UN l'I AN
l'lllV/\lt l'HI) JI l !
ProJ.ct Unlt1
Housin g J,450DU
P,i rldng 3.450 $P
RC?t.11 1 '0.000 SF
Cott
b?0,500,0 00
95,000,000
;, l .500.000
PRIVAl E INV F.SlMf Nl IOl AL, i 788,000,000
Requ ired Steps Who
PARK 1
i) Li.-,d Ac<1~11 ,,tior, a11d Oomol1M)n
2) Pumortt Pnrli Co'1c ept Oe !.,gn
3) P,a p;,,c; C ontr<1 ct l'ocuments
4) B,d P10Ject
5) C:>n~truCI P1 0 1ec.t
PARK 2
'I L.,•,:1 ::.-'QW ~t,:.i, d "ldU6m.;.l1:r --
Z'! P·.-.rJ~ ,r P r •(~-:~;)' Df.:'i J'
1,. P•,:i:1. .,. c~1 • 11 ,1~: 0 0-:,, .. ,"'.,, ..
4\ ij1d Pr-:-1c c:
)! C:>m,t-u· I f r~·1C(t
C,ry
City/Co,\~ult ant
C 1ty/Co nsul 1ar,t
C,ty /Co r\sultun t
C,ty/Conh.Jc:or
r ,t •, r~;)II C11!TJf'I
C:•t ,f(.-,rs,,l:<1"t
l.•f )•ll.?•\~11ltii•'
C1:)·I Cu•••r."c :,:,,
OXFORD PARK', PRU l[C TS
MOU SI N G &
<j 1A.'t10N lt[TA J\
$7 ij. ,,,.Ill Cpl aJ
•
•
•
NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTIONS
Connact ions provide safe and dir1tct pedHtriari
and bik• ,ccH! b1ttween ui!,ting ne,ghborhoodt,
l'\ew d•v•lopm•nt i4r.d station platforms.
PUBllt PRC )H C'TS
Proi•<t
RAil TRAIL
Coit
1. l:iOO,nro
~.~l tO I \)0
ENGLEWOOD PARKWAY ENHANCEMENTS
PUBLI C INVLSIMENl IOI AL
PIIBI IC /I C 110N Pl /IN
Requlr•d Stops
RAIL TRAIL and BRIDGES
\ 150,r. f'
6,250,000
1) Noy o 11;11 ~ l·.~!,t'mur t .,,it h h'I () arod SN~!
2) Pre ;>Jre Ra,1 l •de l Coni:dp l De s1 911
t i qtd Prn 1Pct
5} C o~s:ru :t Pft.l/QCI
ENGLEWOOD PIIRKWIIY ENHANCEMENTS
;1 P•PIJ-''"" P L;,.,,."•~•, I l..,•1.a;.•,;r-11ri11 C"c"J~,.:.~~1 Ln,;1n ·
~) P·eu.,iP. Cr1n •·au Do":I.V"~ .. :s
➔i B,J r,..,,"', !
t 1 (.:,,,,i,1,u , • l>•.l1 •~, •
Who
C11y /k f O/BN SF
C1ty'Co nsult <:M
C1t)IC c,"',..,.11 ~rit
C ,ty1C.)r1sulun :
C1 1yt C..o nt1 &.1t;tOr
C,t, ( ~, s11 I· 1••·
r:1 1~•'Cr"~ult 1"'
r· 11 '(A,.nlo o t•1
(,1,.-/0i:-vv lOl.' .. '
I )'"; ~ r .... ' ,. ., I ,, e • .,. ' I
•
NEIC,HII flHOODlONNtCllON51'HOJH 15
•
•
•
•
•
••
SCHEDULE
Th• tchedule call, tor action on all prc.jectt w ithin
the fir1t ~b, yeiln to el'llure tl'lat plan momentum
11 H t 11bli1hed
REGULATORY
UPDATES
NEIGHBORHOOD
CONNECTIONS
(Rall Trail I
Protected Blk,w1y1)
OXFORD STATION
I OXFORD PARK -N -RIDE
OXFORD PARKS
ENGLEWOOD STATION
FLOYD AVENUE
EXTENSION
!West Neighborhood
, D•v•lopm1nt)
I
1 STATION ACTIVATION
(Housing Over l'ark -N -Midt)
I STATION ACTIVATION
: (Englewood Pkw:r E•t •ntion)
Pro9ri1m
Program
Program
, I
~I
I °""" ''
I ENGLEWOOD
I PARKWAY I (£11,t of Elati Str1,11t l
Pr09r1m o..lg,,
I
ENC.LEWOOD
PARKWAY
(W•st of Elati Strrte t )
I
Program
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Date Agenda Item Subject
September 3, 2013 11 C ii Interim Disinfection
Improvements Project -
Professional Services ARreement
INITIATED BY STAFF SOURCE
Littleton/Englewood WWTP Supervisory Stewart H. Fonda, Director ot Utilities
CommitteP. Chong Woo, Engineering/Maintenance Manager
COUNCIL GOAL ANO PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Council approval of t',,c 2013 Littleton/Englewood Wastewater Treatment Plan Capital Infrastructure
Budget.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
The recommended action is to a(Jprove, L,y Motion, the agreement for Schedule A Task Order #14, with
Brown and Caldwell for engineering support and design services for the Interim D isinfection Improvements
Project located at the Littleton/Englewood WWf P based on the Brown and Caldwell Professional Services
• Agreement dated May 25, 2011.
•
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
The current disinfection system at the WNTP is a liquid chemical system using sodium hypochlorite (a
stron11 bleach sulutiun) tu µruvide d,lorine to disinfect the treated water and sodium bisutfate to remove
the chlorine before discharging the water to the South Platte River. The system is the subject of two recent
engineering.reports.
The first report, r-,repared by Brown & Caldwel, was intended to evaluate the current system, evaluate
alternative dlsinlection systems and to make recommendations regarding the future of disinfection at the
plant. The recommendation of this report was to replace the chemical system with a system using
ultraviolet light for disinfection. A project was begun In convert the current disinfection system lo
ultraviolet light disinfection .
I he second report, prepared by CH 2MH,II, was intended to determine if converting to ultraviolet light
disinfection wa 1 required at that lime. The report determined that the current chemical system is very
complicated and that there i , the potential (expressed in percent of the time) for exceeding permit
limitations (i.e., permit violat,ons). The report did not make any recommendations regarding the
acceptability of permit violatiors, only that they might occur , The report did suggest several improvements
to the current system that would reduce the potential for permit violations. Tlie estimated cost for the
improvement< was projected at Jl ,200,000 and induded:
• Modlflcatlons to the Oxidation Reduction Potendal (O~P) Control System
• Modification to the Ammonia Bypass pumping ;ystem
• Installation of a new Chlorine Contact Tank (CCT) Flowmeter
• Modifications to the Den itrifrcation (Denlte) Backwash Tank
• Installation of a larger Cent rate Tank to allow gradual return of centrate to the system.
As a ,~suit uf du, CH2MHill report, work on converting to ultraviolet lisht di,infection was ,topped and the •
current disinfeclion syst~111 remains in operation.
Staff ha, develuµed a µr •,posed scope or work (o,. an Interim Disinfection Improvements Project needed to
maintain the asset reliabil ity oi the existing system . Additionally, stall has e ·,aluated the Lli2MHill
recornrnetrded improvcrnetrts for inclus ion into this project. The proposed Interim Disinfection
Improvements Project includes :
1. Modifi c ations to the ORP Control Svstem (recommended by CH2MHill)
2. Modifi c •tions 10 the Anunonia Bypass pumping system (recommend«J by CH2MHill)
3. l11s1allation of a new Denitrification Cl ea,well cover (recommended by staff in lieu of CCT
Flowmeter installdt/on)
4. Installation of additional instrumentat,on and contrcls for the Denitriflcation Filters (recommended
by staff in lieu of Denlte Bacliwash Tanlt)
5 . Modification of the chemical feed piping and samplin~ system to improve reliability (recommended
by staff)
Starr has determined 10 delay the CH2MHIII ;ecornn,~ndation to install a larger Centrale Tank and to re-
a ss ess alter the other improvements have been operated for a period of time .
A more detailed description of each modification included in this project is attached. Stall ,~quested a
proposal from Drown & Caldwell to perform the design oi each of these modifications.
The engineering design is estimated to be $145,795, with •n est imated total project cost of
$1,290,000. Funds for the des ign are in the 2013 budget and the cost of implementation is included in the •
2014 p1oposed budget.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The amount is included in the 2013 Capital Infrastructure Budget and will be shared 50/50 by the Cities of
Englewood and Littleton .
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Supervisory Committee minutes with scope summary
Task Order #M Brown and Caldwell
•
•
MINUTES
SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
July 18, 2013
ATTENDING: Michael Penny
Gary Sears
Rick Kahln
Stu Fonda
Jeunifor Hunt
Dennis Stowe
Chong Woo
Jonathan Bridges
Cindy Goodburn
Mary Gearhart
Jamie Eichenberger
8:15 a.m.
I .ittleton City Manager
Englewood City Manager
Englewood Public Works Director
Englewood Utilities Director
Hill & Robbins, P.C.
Manager, UE WWTP
Engine~'ring/Maintaiance Manager, UE WWTP
Industrial Pretreatment Administrator. UE WWTP
Business Services Manager, UE WWTP
Brown & Caldwell
Brown & Caldwell
SECTION Ill• TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION AND OR ACTION
I. · Flows and Loa,1lngs
Stu Fonda reported that the measured flow to the Littlcton/Englewnod WWTP averaged 21.1 mgd in
June, which is decrease of0.5 from May . The mca.sured flow split was 43.1 /56.9 between the cities of
Littleton and Englewood .
ACTION TAKEN-None.
2, Compliance Reports
Stu Fonda repurh:d thut, in June, effluent quality had a 30-day avernge of 2 migL CBODi, 2 mg/L
suspended solids, and 2.6 mg/L ammonia as nitrogen. All permit level. were met.
No spills occu1Ted al the Littleton/Englewood Wastewacer Trealment Planl in June 2013.
ACTION TAKE!\ -None .
Supervisory Committee Meeting
July 18, 2013
Pmgetwo
3. Fiscal Management
Stu Fonda said that O & M expenditures , excluding capital, were S6,038 ,423 through June 2013, or
10 .2 percent under the 2013 year-to-date budget . Vcor-to-date revenues , including industrial
pretreatment and capital nsset sale.s, equnlcd 595,771 through June 2013 .
ACTION TAKEN -None .
4. Industrial Pretreatment
Jonathon informed the Committee that the Pretreatment Division conducted an inspection of the Rnck
Bollom Brewery in response to a call from Southgate Sanitation District regarding corros ion observed
in manholes downstream of the facility . The Div ision has required Rock Bottom to complete an
industrial w11Stewater perm it application for the Division 's review .
The Division also began an investigation of manh11 :~ in the SuuU1 Park area ii , mponsc to a !'<'quest
from the City of' Littleton . Littleton maintenance staff had observed corro<inn m several mw1hules
along South Park Way; no obvious cousc has been i,ientitied so fur .
On June 28, Division staff responded to an incident at All Recycling, Englewood, during whirh sc1•,;0 11I
thousand gallons dark colored water with a chemical odor were being disdi,u~ed lrom the h,, t,•1 ,
'storm water treatment tank' into a Denver storm drain . This facility is situated m both Engl~WOO<' m,.i
Denver, with the storm water treatment system nnd dischnrge in Denver . Di,•ision ~tafT issu.,1 an
immediate c,·asc ond desist of the diSl:hargc. The <.:ity uf Denver and 1he Colorado Derartmenl of
Public Heallh uml Environment (CDPIIE) collected sarr.plcs and CDPHE conducted a site inspection .
ACTION TAKEN -Nono.
5. Odor Reports
Jim Tallent r~-portcd that no odor reports were received at the Littleton/Englewood WWTP ~l ·rins the
month of April 2013 .
ACTION TAK.EN -None .
6. Bcncflclal Use Program Update
Jim Tallent reported that the Meier Farm lease h11S been reviewed. approved and signed by Gary Meier,
in preparation for Littleton anti Englewood Ordinance action in August 2013 .
During the Meier Farm lease renewal process, it was discovered that an assessment of stJUctures
needed to he completed for the City uf Englewood insurance policy . The existing structures were
measured and photographed, and will be reviewed for appropria1e action .
In conjunction wilh the Meier Fann structure assessm,:nt , the Byers farm barn wa.• inspected by the
UE WWTP Safety Coordinator. Recommendations for impron:mcnt will be addressed by Bc:nofkiul
Use staff.
ACTION TAKEN -None .
•
•
•
•
Supervisory Committee Meeting
July 18 , 2013
Page 1hree
7. Reaulatory Programs -Status Report
Mill)' Gardner noted the Commillee's approval to proceed with the Integral contract for lempcrature
evaluntion for the next Hearing. Dula evaluation nnd discussion will he the first slcp toward
developing a proposed uppronch for thot Hearing. She mentioned that Pueblo hud re•;civt:d a
pcnnnncni site-specific standard, and was hopeful ofthut possibility fur the Littleton/Englewood plant.
The new storm water 1:;roup met with Storm Wnter stoff 01 the Colorado Department of Public Health
and Environment this month lo discuss shared concerns about the r"'{uirements of the stonn water
pennits, such as safety and number of m.:,nitoring points, timing of sample taking, and duplication of
requirement!. The Wastewater Quality Control 1Jiv1sion staff clarified some questions, and others will
be addressed at a future meeting.
Mury uu~~•ded the WESTCAS Conference last month, w,d presented n paper on the nutrient process
and ultimate regulations that were adopted in Colorado. She said that Colorado now appears to be one
of the models for nutrient regulations , and that she has been contacted by several people since her
presentation .
Dennis Stowe announced that , after two and one-half years of effort, the EPA has approved the TMDL
th at the Barr-Milton Watershed group (including Littleton/Englewood) has been working or, for the
past ten years.
Dennis dlso reported that selenium ha~ been an issue concerning the South Platte River for a long lime.
The temporary modification for Segment 14 will e1'pirc next year; if it is not renewed, Segment 14
could go on the 303D list for selenium. Centennial is proposing a study lo develop site-;pecitic limits
for selenium , along with the Cities of Littleton and Englewood . The Commillee agreed to off;•
support lo that effort, which might include some stotr and Laboratory time .
ACTION TAKEN -Michael Penny moved that the Supervisory Committee agree lo offer support lo
Centennial and the Cities of Littleton ano Englewood in their effort to develop site-specific limits for
selenium. Gory Sears seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously.
II. CSU Cooperative Reaeareh Project Proposal for 2014
Dennis Stowe noted that Colorado Stale University (CSU) has submitted their 2014 proposal for the
Cooperative Research ProJ""' on Land Application of Sewage Biosolids on dryland wheat. The 2014
study proposal includes the North Bennett farm site and the Byers farm site. An Earthwom\/Hydraulic
Properties Study wos successfully completed and will be closed ul 1111: end of 2013. The total projected
costs arc $109,295 fur 2014 .
In addition to this proposal, UE WWTP staff requested developing a nt:w phosphorus (P) investigutioi:
to replace the earthworm study 11,e objective of this study is to gain an understanding of the properties
of P in the western United States that affect I' dynamics related 10 the land application of biosolids,
such as plant available P, transformations of Pin the soil over lime, and the downward movement of
soil P. Any change in the wastewater treatment process to reduce the concentration of P in the
discharge lo surface water will affect the concentration and potentially the fonns of P in the biosolids .
This research will allow for a proacuve approach to r management and being belier able to adapt
quickly lo future changes in biosolids regulations that effect r application and management. The
projected initial cost of this invc.~tigation is $18,852 . Since they also have an interest in this study,
Metro Wastewater Reclamaliun District (MWRD) has offered to share in the P investigation project
cost -the wnow1l is not determined at the lime of this writing . The combined cost for lhis proposal,
pending shared CQSt with MWRD for lhc P study , is $128,147 .
ACTION TAKEN -Oary Seara moved lhat lhc Supervisory Committee approve the 20 I 4 Colorado
State Uni vcrsity proposal to continue the Cooperative Research Project on Land Application of
Sewage BiusuliJs in Dryland Wheat, including lhe proposed Phosphorous investigation , in the amounl
of$128 ,147 . Michael Pe1u1y seconded U,e motion, and the motion passed unanimously.
9. l'lllRt Gate Repairs and Replacement Project
Chong Woo rcponed Um, •~ pml of lhe planl's ruutiue capital infrastructure projects, scvr.rul main
plnnt gates have been identified for needed repair and replacenM1l. A lolal of 11 gates have been
identified for repair and replncemenl (four-repair and seven-replacement). Thi' Prujccl Y.as advertised
on the Rocky Mountain E-Purchasing Systen, (Bidncl), with the ttirl Opening conducted on July 10,
2013. A total of three (3) Bids were received .
Velocity Con~tructors Inc .• Denver, CO
Stanek Constructors Inc ., Golden, CO
RN C:ivil Constructors Inc .. Centennial, CO
$312,163
$ 421,UU0
$438,000
l'ollowing the Bid Opening, Velocity Constructors Inc. formally lctJUt:Sled lu wiU1Jra1< ils Bid, cil ing
a major oversight in the construction sequence and work scope that was not included in U1c original
Bid price. The City of Englewood accepted the withdraw request .
Stanek Cunslruclurs Inc . was identified as the apparent low bidder . Chong said that, based on staff
review, S1anek's Bid is responsive and compJ.,le . Stanek is a general construction contractor
specializing in water-wastewater prc-jects thut is well known in the industry, and qualified and
competent to perform the scope of work for lhis project The Project was budgeted, and U1e contract
amount (U2l,0OO) is available in the 2013 Budget .
Sup'l!'Visory Committee Mecling
July 18 , 2013
Page four
ACTION TAKEN -Michael rcMy moved thut the Supervisory Committee approve a consttuction
contracl with Stanek Constructors Inc., as the lowest responsive bidder, in lhe amount of $421,000 for
lhe Plant Gates Repair aml Replacement Pmjccl. Gary Scars seconded the motion, Wld it carried
unanimou sly .
JO. Disinfection Project
Chong Woo presented a proi,osed scope of work for a Disinfo~1ion Project. The purpose is to mr.intain
lhe asset reliability of the existing Sodium Hypochlorite (Liquid Chlorine) equipment, until such time
as the system will require ui;gradc 10 a newer technology (i .e., lN Disinfection). Equipmenl such as
chemical tanks, pumps, und meters has approached the end of their useful lives .
•
In addition, staff hos evaluated the recommendations from the 2011 CH2MH1LL repor' that idcnlifies
additional improvements to the operation and reduces the rnmplexity of the system . The CH2MHILL •
recommendations included control of progr31llming modi r,cations, r .xlifications to the ammonia by-
pass pumpinll, inslallolion of a new chlorine cor, tact tank flow ll'•ter, and construction of a dedicated
denite backwash tank.
Al this time, staff anticipates the exis1i11g Sodium HYPochlorite system will be in place until
construction to meet Regulation 85 requin.~ncnts, currently estima1ed to bc!;in in the year 2020. Staff
hos requested Brown and Caldwell lo prepw-e a scope for l'llgineering StJPfl"Tt and de-&ign services.
The total cost ror this project is anticipated to be approximately $1, '!90,(lU0, which includes
engineering, construction and administrative costs. The proposed Engineering (design) cost is
$145,795.
ACTION TAKEN -Micha~, Penny moved that tile ~11perv1sory Committee approve a professional
services agreement with Brown and Caldwell, in the am,)unt of$145,7?~ for the Engineering/Design
portion of the Disinfection Project. Gary Sears ~e-::ondcd the mmior., and it carried unanimously.
I J. Lighting Replacement Project -Status Update
Chong Woo said that the Lighting Rcplnccmcnt Project has b,~n posteJ Lu the Ruuky Mountain E·
Purchasing System (Bidnct). The proposed project schcdul~ is as foi '. vs :
BiJ Opening:
Supl-rvisory Committee Approval:
City Council Approval :
Notice lo Proceed :
Finni Compbtion :
Aui;Jst I , 20 IJ
August 15 , 101]
September l, 2013
September 9, 20 I 3
Dt"l:"1nber ~.o, 2013
The project will consist of replacing aged and energy-intensive fixtures with newer •nd more efticient
fixtures . As discussed previously with the Supervisory Committ<~, foe lechnology pruposed will be
LED . LEDs provide o long lomp Ii fe, are more robust to withstand indu~:riol applications, can handle
cycling {timers aml puwa losses), and ore more environmentally friendly. Locations will include the
Headworks Bldg, Primary Pump Stations I and 2, Tunnel Areas, and the Digester Complex. This
project will be the first of o multi-year effort to replace all lighting within the facility . Chong
anticipates a three-year eifnrt lo complete the plant lighting upgrades .
ACTION TAKEN -None.
Supervisory Committee Meeting
July 18, 201 3
Page five
12, 2014 Draft Llttleron/Englewood Budget Overview
Dennis Stowe intrnducerl the 2014 draft budget, explaining that there are no significant chnn11es in
operation or maintenance anticipated in 2014. The arcos ofsignilicont change arc in personnel costs
(increases in salaries ond other personnel costs) and in routine uapilal txpenst-s (replacement of the
beneficial use trailers, the labora•o ;y and several vehicles that are 10+ years old,) In addition, the
plant will be filing a discharge permit renewal application, although we no action is expected on the
permit by the Water Quality Control Division for several years. These changes result in a draft 2014
budget that is approximately 6% above the 2C'l3 budget The items previously identified represent
over 90% of this increase,
Dennis said that the infrastructure capital project budget continues at the same level as 2013. In
addition, a disinfection project is beinl,\ assembled based on the recommendations o f ti,, p,.,viou s
CH2MHill report and the maintenance neP.ds of the current system. The scope, schedule and cost
cslimnte for the project is currently being developed . Costs for this project arc not included in the draft
budget.
ACTION TAKEN ••Non~.
13 . Hill & Robbins Report
Jennif~, Hunt noted lhAt she had enjoytd 1hc Awards Ceremony Luncheon . She had a.n opportunity to
tolk with Senator Mark Udall's representative, and exchnngc contact informat ion with him.
ACTION TAKEN -None.
14 . Sthedule for the Next Supcn-lsory Comntlttee Meeting
The next Supervisory Committee meeting is scheduled for Thurway, August 15 , 2013, 9 :00 a.m ., at
the L!ttlcton/Englewood Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Adjourned 9:5S o.m.
•
•
•
•
Purpose
Interim Disinfection Improvements
Lit11eton/EngJewood WWTP Supervisory Comm ittee
July 18 , 2013
lr,e nuroo~e or tn 1s 0101ect Is to ma ke 11nprovemen1s 10 the L1H leton/E11e_1ewood \L/l l Wast ewate r lreatment
Plan t's (WWlPJ disinfection system to increas e t he re liability of exis tin g eQmpment In additio n, imoro\lements
recomme nd ed 111 the lecnnica i Memorandum ti tted Assessmen t of th e E1.ist i ,1g Oisi nfecrion S)l stem ar the
Lfr"1eton/fflglewood wasreware, Treatm ent Pl3n , dated August 1. 2011 will be add ressed . Thes e
1mr,,vve11en 1s mclude :
Heoiace men t or the U.11-' con1101 sy s~e m
ReconfiguratK>n ano opt1m1zat1on of the ammon ia bypass pump ing sys tem
Reorogramm 1ng and lrnp roveo monitonng of th e cJcnitr ification filte 1s to optim ize bac k.wash ani.1
'-PP.~d-bump cyr.lP.S
Prev ent olgoc growth in the dcniv11tcotlon filter clcorwcu~ 10 ovo id Impa ctIng !he chlorine co nt.1 c 1
tan k {CCT) fl cwmeter
lrnprove reciunciancy ano rellaDll 1ty of c hemlcal feed and ellluent snmp llnc systems
ORP Contr ol System
lhe cu 1re,1l orw conuot system Is nearing tn e eno of +ts us lul lite ano reQuue s rep lace m ent. rne
manu l ac l urer of tn e un,t, S1ran1 ro l. was-acq uir ed by Sie mens, wh ic h 1s no lo nger supporting Hie Strantrol
product hne. Replacement parts are becoming mo~e difficult to find . sign 1ri cant1~· reducing tt,e reha bll ily of the
system . This project will identi'v an a lternative ORP contro l S\'St em for insta l!au on at th e l /E WWTP .
An11noni11 Bypass
Tne L/E W'N1 P re lies on ettlu ent ammonia to produce chtcram i nes ror disinfection . Effluent ammonia from the
wwrP ,s 100 low to ,elia~ly oroduce ch loram Ines. so secondary eff luent i5 bypa sse d aroun d the tertiary
tr e alm()nt processes t o ma Inta In nn eHIL :ent ammonia concent ra l Io n ot 1.5 to 2 0 mf/1.. Duri ng summer
mon111 s , se conoary effluent amrnoaIa is reduced due to unplan ned nitrification ln the secondary process . lhis
t1m11 t trie c □pacily of th e e,dsting ammonia bypo:::.o ~ystcm . Tn is projcCI will CJ1plorc bottI proce:::.r. ana
me ctiarncAI allernati \l CS to address this i5..">ue.
Oenite Filt ers -Monitoring an~ Control
Cu r,ent11 . .,.,hen a tilter enters backwash mode, effluent fl ew fluctoa tes by as n,ucn as 10 m gd. This sudden
Cll(Hl~t: HI fluh 1i.::~u i1ts tll~ Clle nttCi:1 1 f txO S)'S \'.;!111 to resµOlll.l Quickly . lagti Il l tl1t: sys l~lfl increase l ll ~ risk of
\110Ia 1Ion. l nis projec t will lmpro \'e m e momto ring anel control oi th e cJernte l11t ers 1/J minimize rne Impact 01
oackwasn ana s~ed bumps on the system oy Install i ng add1J ional instrumentation ana mod1tymg the ernst1ng
SCAOA orog, affl ming.
CCT nowmeter
The CCT ti:,wm ete r s a propell er -style meter. A1gae in the eHlu em has been ol>served to accumuta1e o,, tne
me:e ,. ,m oac t1 n~ control of the cnem Ica l feed system . Tne flowm ~ter ,s mte gHI to the ais1nfec11on co ntrol
system a1 Hl elln,inatlon of alga e t1t1 ilrlup ,s critica l to mainI,;1nlng re ha bility in the system . The sou rce of the
algae ;:i ppea ,s 10 be the deni1rif1 cation filter clearwell . Th i~ pro1 cc t will cons11uc1 a shade struc tur e. a net coat
the 1me1101 of 1he clearwell to prevent atgae growth and ;;,ccurnul ation .
Chemical Feed and Sampling
Tn e ~oo,um hypochloutc p1p ing I!'i pro ne 10 sct1fin 1 . The piping i:J ()ilralleled fo r 1nc mojorit y of 113 rout e form 1'1e
che 011 caI feed building to the iniecuon po1n1 ; 1,owev er. lhere are short sections cl tnis piping for whicn the ,e 1s
no ,e cl\1ntl a11 .,;y. Thi s pI oi ec 1 wi ll 11:<:0 11f igui e 111 1: µip 1ng to l)(Ov iUe full 1tdum.1a nt.:y in 111 ~ sodium nypact1I0,ite
ft!ea system. a1Iowt n& one pip e to oe r.I eaned wnlle tnc other remains m scr\11c e. In aodilion. the sampllrlg
sys1em 111 the Sod•um B1sultite Bu ild ing req uires modIl1cat1on . lhe sampling hose is d1tt1cuI1 to remo\le and
rep lace. ancJ Ille samp ling pumps are sub-n e,s1b le un its. wh ich reou ue fr equ ent maintenance. rt,is orojec\ will
e);plore alternatives for replacing the suomersIble sampling pumps wi th dry units. and reconf1gunnt the
samohng 1.:onduit to allow for regular rem oval and reo lacement ol th e sampling hose.
• 1.
2 .
•
4 .
5.
•
SCHEDULE A
Task Order 14 ENG .2013 -Interim Disinfection Improvements
Littleton/Englewood WWTP
STATEMENT OF WORK
GENERAL
The Littleron/Englewood Wastewater Treatment Plant (UE WWTP) has requested Brown
and Caldwel, provide engin eering and technical support to increase the reliability of the
current disinfection sy.<tem.
Upon execution ot lhis Task Ord er, and elfeclive as ot Augusl 15, 2013, Ille parties
agree 1ha1 Brown and Caldweli shall perform lhe following services lisled below.
Brown and Caldwell's servir.es shall be governed by the Professional Service Agreement
(PSA) dated May 25 , 20 1, together with lhis Task Order and any Exhibit s attached
hereto.
NAME OF PROJECT COORDINATORS
Brown and Caldwell's project team is led by Sarah Reeves. Jamie Eichenberger i.~ the
Project Manager and project engineers will include Dan Clayton , Stephanie Fevig, and
John Bratby. Thero may be isolated needs to engage other engineers and staff to
complete work associated with this agIee111enl, in cludir1g subconsullaI1t AMWEST (Fred
Wilson ) for SCADA syMem programming. The project stall tor UE are Greg Farmer and
Don Ekstein with Chong Woo as the project manager.
PURPOSE FOR STATEMENT OF WORK
The purpose of this project is to make improvements to the Lirlleton/Englewood (UE)
Wastewater Treatment Plant's (WWTP) disinfection system to increase the reliability of
existing equipment. In addition, certain improvements recommended in the Technical
Memorandum titled "Assessment of the Existing Disinfection Sys tem at the
Littleton/Englewood Wastewater Treatment Plant," dated August 1, 2011, will be
addressed. These improvements include:
• Replace the ORP con/I0/ system.
• Reconfigure and optimize the ammonia bypass pumping system.
• Reprogram and impmve monitoring of the denitrification Ii/tors to optimize backwash
and speed-bump cycles .
• Prevent algae qrowth i1I the denitrification filter clearwells to avoid impacting the
chlorine contact tank (CCT) flowmeter.
• Improve redundancy and reliability of chemical feed and effluent sampling systems.
DESCRIPTION OF WORK PRODUCT ANO DELIVERABLES
A detailed description of work producls and deliverables Is Included in the anached
Scope of Services.
SPECIAL TERMS
Consultant 's work product, which is prepared solely for the purposes of this agreement,
including, but not limited to , drawinys, test results . recommendations , and technica l
specifications, whether in hard copy or electronic form , shall become the property of
Client when Consultant ha s been fully compensated as set forth herein. Design
calculations and/or . node/ runs developed for the work prod Jct shall be transmitted to
the Cliwt. Only final calculations, portable document format {PDF) images, or
spreadsheet results shall be transmitted to Client for the work ptoduct requiring the use
of proprietary models . Consultant may keep copies of all work products tor its records.
6 . MODE OF PAYi'viENT/COiViPENSATION
All work shall be performed on a tin:; and expenses basis in accordance with the PSA
dated Ma}' 25. 2011 . Time related charges are hourly billir>g ra t?s and shall t,11 the Int RI
l>ours worked on a task by each employee, multiplied by the employees· hourly billing
rate. Overhead and profit are included in each hourly rate . Total cost /or this Task Order
shall not exceed $145,795 without additional written 11uthorizatio n A detailed cost
breakdown is attached. Rates for professional ser\'ices shall be in ;iccordance with
Exhibit A -Project Rate Schedule. The current r;ite tRble is in e ffec t ,mt/I December
2013. At that t,me, Brown and Ca ldwell will propose an update, If appropriate.
7. PAYMENT SCHEDULE
City will pay Brown and Ca ldwe ll for the ir work upon deliverables as agreed by Ow11e1
and Com:11/lilnl for ,11,, tRsk .s in 1h11 attached Scop e of Se rvices. Monthly i11voici11g will
doc, 1men1 work complered for that invoice period.
8 . SCHEDULE
Work will be performed i11 accorda~e with /he attached project sct,edute .
9. LOCATION OF WORK FACILITIES
Substantially all of the work will be conducted by Con sul tant at its regular office lo ca ted
at: 1697 Cole Bou levard, Sutte 200
Golden , CO 80401
Or the City wi ll provide Ctt y office space and support. as appropriate, at the UE
WWTP.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. pursuant and in ac co rda nce with the Professional Services
Agreement between the part ies hereto dated ______ ~'l _. the parties have
executed this Statement of Work as ol this ___ day at _______ , 20_
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
By:
(S lgnttl U!tt)
(Prinl Nomo)
Title :
Date :
BROWN AND CALDWELL
?»1fllk {& o.,,i..-By:
(S l~t~o) , u
~fAn,e)_ ~15[
(rrim N:uno)
•
•
•
•
•
EnllnNrftl
IMpedorlll
Senior Desl,nor
Sup1"'1ln1 llnlftor
Sup1nlalnl lffustrator
Slnlor En11neer
Prtnclpal 0n1iner
SenlarCon1tnict1on En&lnNr
Senlo,rn_.n .. ,
Prlnclpal EnllnNr
l'rtnclpal Constnictlon EnllnNr
SuPfflftlOI .,..,,,..
Supenftlnc Enll-
Sull"nftloc Conllr. [nlJONr
SUpervtSlng EnlJIIII
• senior Ylee PrtslNlnt
I. . .. i I Pnsldtnt/lictcutMVlco :~ ~;r .. , President
-~ Chlof£ac:ullve Officer
Fleld Service Te chnician
Field Service Te r:hn(clan n
F1etd Sc Mee Te chni cia n Ill
Geologlsl/Hydrogeologlst I
Sclenllst I
Stnlor Reid 5eMce Techn ician
Ceologlst /Hyd rogoologlst II
Sdentl5tll
Geologlst/HydrogeologJst Ill
Sclenllstlll
s,nlor Geologlst /l~drogeologlst
senior Scientist
Prlnclpal Geolo(Jst/Hydrogeologjst
Pnnclpal Scient ist
SupervtSlng Scientist
Suporvtslng Geologist /
Hyd,OCtcloglst
Managlng
GtoloClst/ Hyd rogeologJS1
Man1&1ng Scientist
ChlafSclentls'.
Chief GeOloglsl/lty<trogeologlst
Nous: StamlurJ 111 /11111 Htilt s w.•1/1 bt-re.•i }t,t 111u111nl!y 1111" L't1ft,u/1.r ymr oo.,·u
lllll/111 lfarr:.r ~•,fl b.! ustd ncca •dmg l(l flu! Cl11sstfm1rw 11 IL'·rl.
Word Processor I
llltce/S111>po~ Strvtcos II $73
Word Processor II
Olflce/Suppo~ Servtc .. Ill $73
Accountant I
Word Pmcessor Ill
Offlco /Suppon Smlcos IV $83
Accountant II
Word Prous.sor IV
S92
Accountant Ill
Alea B1slncssOpera ti ons
Mgr
Technlcal Writer
Word Processing Supervisor $110
Accountant IV
Admlnlstrallve Manager
$129
$ie nlor TP.Ctmiul Writ er
$148
Corp . Contract Administrator
$168
Assistant Controller
$180
Area Bus Ops Mg,IV
$198
Corp M1rkltlng Comm . Mgr.
$212
$212
$220
$220
$2 20
An ASWf.'iuttrl r,,,jti:1 l iu: IAPCJ 11/ l l OO U mclwltd ~, dutC111.Jbo , ""'" l o o'O\'tl ~ ron 11/l'l•Nlust ftJlfodur:um JU\'IClS tncludmg
i roplur.J mi•/ /lllntflf'"l'Y"'I• rnlo , 1,ri"rln,r, li •n11-dutuni:t> ,,.1,,,r.1m, ,:11/l.1 i•u:lwli"t rt ll p'irmt ,,.J1,,:n .facur.ii~. fVJStast, owm,Rhl IUlil
courln 1rn;1 r tJ, wn C'&Dk mr.putt • umgt.
Oth;.r 1/irrc1cmu J'ia/1 lu bilfttl (It ae1u11I CU.It p l.11 fl J()il, Stf'o'IU t.luUXt', D1r,ct chargtJ u rt a/l rhurRt:S UI Mr Ihm: tirrL •rtlldttl dtil'Jt'S, '"°''~cJ dur,1ly for tlt.t proJ~.
S11~f'" 'll ffll•II ('Utfj shnll bt /I r/ltd Ill (IC1111JI ('('fl pfll! U 111•41 J'tf"l!/U r fr a,,,.
Mlltu,r f! rt1 111 bu,unu'm ,u1e iJ l'(/W1iJ ,,, 1M IRS S1m,t1m,J Milr111r. R.llt (JO JO.lm!rk 1u (lj July 101.1 /,
•
•
•
p :•.HBIT A
Ut.tleton/Englewood Wastewater
Treatment Plant
Interim Disinfection Improvements
Scope of Services
Pr e pa re ~ f or
Littlet on/ Englewo od IVWTP
JUiy 20 1 3
~XHUUTA
Project Overview
The Linletnn/Englewood (l/E) Was tewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) eva luated the disinfection system in
2010. The result of that evaluation was a recommendation to Improve the system 's rellablllr1 to ensu re
cnntlnuect compliance with discharge pP.rmlt effluenl slandards. A workshop was held with l/E staff on
June 25, 2013 to Identify required ir· 1rovements and refine the scope of services shown below .
This Scuoe of Services includes t11e foll owing phases:
Phase 100 -Proj ect Management and Adr'li nis lration
Ph as e 200 -ORP System Improvements
Ph ase 300 -Ammonia Bypass Pumping and Seco ndary ProcEss Optim11a1io n
Phase 400 -Denit rification Filter Improvements
Phase 500 -Ch ernica l FeerJ ann Samplrng Improvements
Pha;e 600 -Docum ent Production
Project Objectives
The fo llowing s pecific project objectives have been identijied:
, Increase the rel iability of the P.xistingclisinfer.tlon system.
Improve monitoring ond control of ammonia bypass pumping and den,t rification filler backwash
op eration.
Address deficiencies In the chem ical feed , sampllne, and flow monitoring sysle111s .
L/E Responsibility
L/E shall provide to BC all available and relevant Information to aid rn the planning proces~. This
Includes, but is not limited to:
Operntionnl data.
Knowlt!df.eallle staff who can disc uss operatio11a 1 and maintenance issues.
Timely review and comments within agreed upon schedules :
-Th e accompanying schedule assumes review comments will be provided within 10 bus iness
days of submittal of techn ical memoranda and design aocuments .
Project Assumptions and Limitations
The followln~ assumptlo11s were made In the development of this S~'Olle of Services:
Dnlv the feasibility of dedica t ed back wash supply will be inveS1igated . DAtailed design ot this process
Is not included in this scope ot work.
The t ec hnical memoranda ond design submittal packages will be re·1ised once each, purs uant to
l./E's comments and suggestions.
, All techn ical memoranda a nd submntal packages will be 1evie wed within 10 worhing days of
submlttaf.
Th is scope ot work 1s tor preliminary design throug)l desi gn services only and does not Include
services during bidoing or construct ion .
•
•
•
•
•
•
F.XHIRIT A
The work proposed will not affect design capa city and will not require a site app li cat ion amendment
or CDPHE invo lvement.
fo,,,t-end spec1f1cat1ons (Divisions 00 and 01 1 will be prepared by Lit11cton/Englewood .
SC1\DA programmi ng will not be completed in this phase . Rat her, guidance will be provided in the
specifications for comple ti on during construc tion .
Detailed Scope of Ser,ri ~~s
Phase 100 -Project Management and Admlnlstratior1
j\.J!. Act!vifes
Project Management and Administration Includes the followiro~ activities:
Project Management Planning
Project Meetings and Worksh ops
Project Control and Reporting
Project Closeout
1.1.1 Project Manag· ment Planning
The Project Management Plan will cl oc rom P.nl lhe key proJP.Ct inlormation reou,red by all project t eam
members to assist th em in executing the r1101e c110 meet thP. rP.Quire d objectives: on t ime. on budget.
h1Ch quality, Mn meeling L/E's crit ir.a l success factors . The key e·~ments of tile 010Jec t plan are
'1P.sc ritlAc1 hAlow:
Project Charte r. wh ich wlll establish the project goals, objec tives, and critical success factors .
Project ream members, their roles. and respenslbllltles . Including a staffing plan i mana~e111 ent,
engineering, QA/QC, etc.)
Scope of Se rvices with work breakdown structure
Project schedule updates will oo provided i11 111011thly progress rep o rts if changes have been made
and agreed UPOII by l/E
Project budgets
Communications Plan
Risk Managemen~ Plan
QA/QC Plan
Proiect 11ocumen1a1,on pl;m a nd file s1ruc111re
Change management process
Health and Safety Plan for f ield wo rK, If applicable
1 .1 .2 Project Control and Reporting
Monthly invoices will be prupared and submitted to L/E in an aoproved form at . Invoices s hAII Include:
Total contract amou nt
Total charges to date
Previous billing.<;
Outstanding Oillance
Current nmount remaini ng
Tmill amount due
•
•
This task also includes periodic project rev iew by BC management to assure that the project is meeting
L/E"s critica l success factors, is on schedule, and within budget •
•
1-:XHIBll' A
1.1.3 Project Meetings and Workshops
BC will meet with L/E every month to review project status, coordinate project activities, obtain direction,
and answer specific questions relat ing to the project. Two members of the consultant team wi ll
participate . Th e budget includes travel to six monthly meetings over the course of the project.
Conferonce co ll updates will be he ld , as needed, between monthly progress me eti ngs.
1.1 .4 Quality Control and Deliverable Production
This act ivity In cludes Internal qualitl' control review for all technical memora nda , calculations a nd
process models.
1.1.5 Project Close-out
During project c l<Y.~-out , BC wr ll msolve a ll final invoices to L/E. consolidate and a rc hive all project files .
and meet with l /f l o rP.v iP.w the. ruoject perform ance and achieveme nt of project objectives.
1.2 Deliverables
Th e following delive rables will he provided as part of t hi s phase:
Project Milmigement Pl an (w h ich includes the QA/QC plan)
Monthly Invoices
Meeting agendas, presentation materials, and minutes
Phase 200 -ORP System Improvements
• 2.1. Objective
•
Re portedly, the existing Strantrol oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) system Is no longP.r bei ng
supported b}' the manufact ure r and spare parts are limited to those currently in inventory from Sieme ns.
While this system has operated adeQuately in the past, the lac k of prod uct su pport and limited s upply o f
spare parts has made Its cont inue d re liability unce rtain . A ne w ORP control system will be installed to
replace the exist ing system.
2 .2 Activities
2 .2.1 Identify and Evaluate ORP Control System Alternatives
BC w,11 work with l/E staff to determin e the required features torthe new ORP control system. Up to tour
a lte rnatives that meet these c rit e ria will be identified a nd evaluated, and a fina l recommendatio n
provided.
2.2.2 Prepare Technical Me,-.,oram!!!m
A technir.al memorandum (TM) will be prepared to summarize the product requirements . identify
alte rn a tives. report on th e evaluation or the identified ORP co ntrol syste ms. a nd recommend
a lternatives. Cutsheets o f the recommen ded equi pment will be in c luded in the oppendix of the TM .
2.3 Deliverables
The ae liverables for this phase of the project wil l include dr-ft and final technical memoranda .
[j)J·u @C" ~s"l@ O <• ~,.1d11.1l@illil0@ t~y~c:)f.l(i\ l,3'~J jt]~[6ilf.; ~m:I SC@,.?mJ,~iy
[l):7ogoos Opt!m&2ati @r1
S\.1 Objective
The l./E WWTP sets a target efflueri. dmmonia con ce ntration of 1.5 to 2.0 m&,'I to ensure ad equate
ammonia is available for chloramine disinfection. Current ly, the ammonia bypass pumping system is not
aule tu µr uviue alJeQuate fluw to maintain this effluer,t cori centration during summer months. In the
summer. the solids contact ranks (SCTs) appear to he nltrllylng. reducing the se condary effluent
ammonia concentration available for bypass. This requrres substantlall:· higher bypass pumping rates
than the system was originally designed for. A combination of in creased pumping capacity and process
optim ization during s umme r montns will al leviat e this issue, ollowing for more reliable disinfection.
3.2 Activities
3.2,1 Review Operations Dato
Operations data will be rev iewed to determin e a bas eline for design of the arnmoni.i bypass system. The
review will establish avera~e. maximum, and min imum ammonia concentrations in t he secondary
effluent during differe nt times of year to determl11e u,e reQuired µumping caµacity. A s~nsitivitv analysis
wil l li e conduc ted as pan of this phasP. to dP.tP.rmlnP. thP. Impact nl ammonia conr.entral lon on byPass
pumping rates .
3.2.2 Hydraulic Modeling and Design
•
Once base line ammonia co nce ntrations □nd subsequent pumping rotes have been established, the •
bypass system hydraulics will be evaluated to determine what improvements are required to ma intain an
effluent ammonia c.-oncentration ol 2.0 mg/I. In addition the size and type of flow control valve will be
evaluated to Identify alternatives for Improved turndown of the system.
3.2.3 Process Opllmlzatlon
A BioWin model of the secondary process will be developed to assist in optimization of the secondary
process. The purpose of this task Is to identify operations strategies that will reduce or elim inate
nitrification in the SCTs, raising secondary effluent amrnonia concentrations. This will In turn, reduce
the amount of bypass pumping required to ma intain an efflui:0t concentration of 2.0 mg/I. 111 addition ,
rHdu c ing or elimiualing nitrification in the SCTs will provide more cc nsistent loading to the nitrilying
tnckllng filters, which shou ld result in better overall plant pP.rformanr.e . Th's will he nar.P.ssary In the
future as Regulation 31 comes into effect.
3.2.4 Prepare Technical Memorandum
A TM will be prepared to summarize current operation, the impacts of ni trification in tho SCTs on tho
ammonia bypass pumping system, hyd raulic considerations, and process optim ization strategies.
Ret;u1n111enc.lations for impruverne11ts will IJe provid e<.J .
3.3 Deliverables
The deliverables for this phase of the project w,11 in clude dratt and hnal technical memoranda .
•
•
•
•
EXHIBIT A
Phase 400 -Denltrlflcatlon FIiter Improvements
4.1 Objective
Operation of the deep bed (Tetra '"' Denlte'"') oenitriflcation filters results In significant and s udden
changes in the effluent flow, up to 10 mgd, during backwash and speed bump events. This su dden
r.h~ngP. in flow requires the chemical feed system to rapidly change fl o w rate to maintain disinfection
and dechlorination, increasing the likelihood of violation. This phase will invest igate alternatives to
minimize fluctuations In effluent flow Including construction or dedicated backwash supply and Improved
instrumentation to help predict and control these events.
111 addition, th e chlorine contact tank flow mete, has been experiencing !allures due to algae buildup. To
mitigate tr1 is iss ue, a shade wilt be installed on the filter etfluent c lea rwell .
4.2 Activities
4.2 .1 Evaluate Dedicated Backwash Supply
Operations data will be reviewed to identify th e amount a nd frequency of backwash and speed bump
cycles. These data will Ile used to <Jevelup an equalization volume for a dcdlcat,'<.I ba ckwash supply.
Planning leve l costs will be developed for the equalizat ion basin to determine if this would be a feasible
alternative.
4 .2 .2 Instrumentation and Programming
Design inst rumentation and programming for t he denitrifica t ion filte rs will be m o dified t o provide
additio nal data and control. Ultraso nic level se nsc rs w,11 be added for ea cr, filte r , and data returned t o
the SCADA system. Active control of ba ckwashes and speed bumps w ,11 not be considered as part of t h is
project.
Th e existing SCADA system will be modified to allow for th e following:
1. Allow backwash and speed bump frequency to be set for each filte r. Filt e rs are run in different
modes (denitrification vs . filtration) which requi1e different frequencies .
2. Add level information to the SCADA display and historian for the new level sensors.
3. The existing backwash l'loat will t>c retained for backup and/or alarm use.
4 .2.3 Clearwell Improvements
Brown and Caldwell will design shades to 11,alt algae growth In the denltriflcatlon filter r.learwells, thereby
lessening algae buildup on the chlorine contact tank (Ccn flow meter . Routine maintenance of the
clearwells req uires entry. so covers will not hP. mnsidered as they wou ld make the space a confined
space. Rather , a s hade system will be provided to 1educe sunlight, while p1eventing the clearwells from
being cla ssified as a co nfined space. In addition, the clea rwe ll will be coated with an algae-resistant
coati ng system .
4 .2.4 Prepare Technical Memorandum
A technical memorandum will be prepared to summame the feas1011Jty and sizing of a dedicated
backwash supply, instrumentation and controls improvement~. and clearwell improvements.
Improvements recommendations will be included .
~.3 l.}'0 ,1'!0?e:f [Gf:
The deliverables for th is phO so of tho project wrll include draft and f!~~I technical memoranda.
~1 hase 500 • • Cham il!ai hied and Sampling Improvements
5 .1. Objective
Tt1e LJE WWTP Is ex per ie ncing scali ng in the sod ium hypochlorite feed piping. While portions ot the
pipel ine are parallolod , tho slnglo plpo ll no branches are unable to be taken out of se rvice to be cleaned.
Piping modlfl cu tions should bo prov id ed to allow for full redundancy, allowing one sid e to be isolated and
c leaned, while th e 0111er is still In se,vlce . Scaling issues are downstream of the carrier water addition,
which Is requ ire<! to re<Ju c-e re tentiu11 limo in the chemical piping. Softening of the carrier water
(ee nerally rP.cyc led n la rll Hff l11Pn t nr ·:i wHter ") w il l no r Ile consid ered tor th is project.
In addition, the sampling numn s a t the Sodium 81sulf rtc Bu ilding (SBS) aren't working as Intended . The
•,use condui t between the sampling manhole ana ouild 1ng needs to oe rep laced to allow for removal and
replacement of tho sa mpling hoses. In addition , the sample pumps are current ly submers ibles, ano
req uire frequent rc pc11r and rep lacem ent. Th ese pu mps will be eval u ated to determine if they should be
ru placed by a Sdrnpll 11g pump t hat sits on a she lf mounted to th e manhole wall to keep th em out of the
fl ow st,ea ,n o r pussi lJly so,ne o l11 ttr configurat io n.
5.2 Activities
5.2 .1 Redundant Sodium Hypochlorlte Piping
•
The sodium h)•pochlorite piping between the carrier water feed and injection point will be paralleled for •
full redundancy and to a llow one si d e to be take n out of se rvice and cleaned while the other remains in
service . In addit io n, press ure t ransducers will be Installed on t he disc harge line and tied Into SCADA for
monitoring and alarm to ale rt operations and ma intenance staff when th e lines are scaling and need to
be c lea neu .
s.:t2 Replace Sample Line Conduit
The condui t thot houses the sample lines between the manhole and SBS Building does not a llow the
sampling hOses to be re moved and replaced. The conduit will be replaced, upsized. and provided w ith
lone.-rad l us fittings to promote removal and replace ment of sampling hoses.
5.2.3 Replace Sampling Pumps
Tl 1e e,lsting sampling pumps arc submersible units due to the lon g suct ion line that would be required
for '"'"" trallillo11al Sd111pl inl! pun rps . Th ese pu mps will be repla ced with peristaltic sa mpling pumps,
m ounted on a ptmfor rn locatP.tl In th e sa mpling manhole, above lhe llow path.
5.3 Deliverables
No specific d e live ra bles am a: ra ted with th is Phase .
•
•
•
•
F:XIIIIIIT A
Phase 600 -Design Document,
6.1 Objective
Exte nd prelimi nary de gn co nce nts dttvolopod In th ~rlor I,hase s and prepare desi gn drawings and
spec,fi cation s to suppon implementati on of ,oco n,mAnded Improvem ents.
6 .2 Activities
6.2.1 Prepare 60% Document&
BC will pre par e a tab le of contonts ror sr> i lcatlons , nn,I GO% t.1 1awlngs. Spt:cif ,calion s a11d dra wi11gs
will be del ivered elec 1t u 11 k,dlly 111 PDF lrn111u1 for r view.
6.2.2 Prepare 90% Document s
BC w,11 p,e pare 90% spe c,l ica tlon s ntJ drawings . Spe cifica tio ns and drawings wi ll be delivered
el ect ronically In PDF fo,ma t 1011 ev l N ,
6.2.3 Prepare Final Document ,
Bf. will 11 rApmP f inal spocif lcn t irn,s nnd dmw1np,s, Specifica tior,s and tl rawing.c; ~ill be delivered
electron,ca ll y In PDF tonnal. D11 ~ 111 11 sl1oc:t an d thrL 3 half -sized sets of d1 awings wil l also be delivere d.
6.3 Deliverables
60% specl'.lcatlons and drawings
90% sr.eci f lcatlo ns and dra wing~
Finni spe cif ica tions and druwlng.s
EXHIBITB
Offlce/S~pon Sentces I $73
D,.fter Trainee Fleld Servlcelecl•1lclan Word Prucessor I
Office/Support SeMces II S73
AsMstant Drafter Aeld Strwlco Teclvllclan 11 Word ProcOSSOl 11 $73 Office/Support Senlces Ill
Drafter AC countarn I
En,in11~nlAldo Aeld 5'nlctt Tttchn lc!im Ill Wo1dPr~t:essor Ill U3
lospoctlon Aldo Office} Support Sen.tcos IV
EnlJnHrl
Gcol•Gis1/Hydrogeologlst I 5et110rDr;1fter Aceountantll
senior Illustrator Sc ientist I Word Procenor IV
$92
llhl>OCIDr I Senior Fleld SeMce lechnldnn
En,ineorll Accoumantlll
1-olDfll Geolog~l{Hydrog,,ologlst II Area Business Ope,aUons Mg, 1110 lladDraft■r Scientist II Tcchn fcal Writer
lllll lllustnltor Word Proce~ng Supervisor
En&aneerlll
lupectarlll Gaologlst/Hydro190IOClst 111 Accriuntartt IV SenlDr De1lper S129
lupewl<tn& Drafter Sclentbtlll AdmlnlruaUve Manage,
Supewlsln& lllustmtor
lllnlor lnl/nnr
Prt11clpal Dlllsi,e, Senior Geolo&lst/Hycrogcologlst Senior Techn lcal Writer S148 Senior Constr.1ctlon EnCJnecr Senio r Scient ist
Senfor rn,lnetr
Pr111clp1t Entln11r Prtnclpol GeologJ,1/Hydrogeolo~~ Prtn~lpal Conltrvctton (ndnnr Corp . Contract Adminlstrittor $168
Suporvllln& DeslO,er PrtnclpalScl111t1st
\ , SUp1ffl1ln1 Engineer Supef'llslng Sdentlst
&uporvlsln& Const,, En111noor Supcl'llslng Clealoglst/ As51stant Conttolle r S180
&uptftlslnt Ena,noor Hydrog,111og1st .. Managi ng OeolotJst/HrdrogeologM . Manai!nC E11glnNr Alea 8b5 Ops MC, IV $198
.~~~ . MonogJng SclcnUst
. · tt¾ Chief En,ineer Chief Sdentlst Corp Ma O.etintCoillm, Mr.,. 1212 , Erecuttt. E~nNr Chief Goologlst/Hydrogoologlst
Vice Ptesldent 121,
Senior Vite President 1220
PresldenVEle.:uth-1 VICI President 1220
j enter becuUYe Officer 1220
Notes: Standard !J,J/lng Rar ~ w//1 l>f' r0Yls c1f anriua lly on a ca leru:ta,-w-:, basis.
&wnR, Hal es wit/ De used acco,aln/? ro me c1as s11,a,11cn Levei .
An A5soeld ttd Pro/~ Cost (APCJ of $5.00 Is lnclucled pe,c,;re,;t ldbof'houf ro .:ore, me cost of In house tep,·oo ucuor, scn,/c:e$ lrtC/udlng
~I.JPhlCS Ofl/J PhOIOOOP>1nll, caJol ortnung. lon~•diS IDncc retei,tr..nc C;JI~ lnc luC1lng ce11 plloN:J C~'J:C~. fDC::ltn llc, po::r.1r,c, Cl\-i?m tg,11 llnc/
co.1rle, servjces, and CA(Vcn m1111tPf" u~,'lge.
S11tx:onsu1Wnl tees wlflt>t?Ch81ged wtrn a l OptrCP.nt ma,1eui,.
•
Olher dlrea C:OSlS SflO '/ t>C blilca.11 llC!UOI 00,1 plus O 5CMc:e CM,.C Of 10 percfnL Oltcct ch.lrge, arc Of/ct\Orges other than 1/m~ •
refated char{!e';, /,,curred cr.rectty tor lhO pro/OCf.
M!/eage relr,oursemenr rare Is eQtJ,JI ro rnc ti?.$ Standard Ml/eat~ Rate ('J0.565/m/Je as a• Jury 2<.l JJ /.
•
, .. l'tofMtM,n•,.men1 , .. 2,,,,. "' ,,. m a,41, '" Con1tt1ls ,.,...., P"p"Yl1ng ., 8,4,'4 0 .,41:4 '" P,01&e1Manngom.,t P':an • ts;, 0 • 0 ..,
"' ~IN:!th Irr! S1th>ty J'lfan "' "' ,,. "' .. , , .. ,.,uJ.,.;1M11t11l1~s fl 1 1,35? 11 ,35' '" QAJ<lC ,. ll,!f/1/ 1,111CI :~6 c ,n aou1 ,., ...
"'" OAP 5rtl•m lrnpro....,,,.nt, .. 1 ,712 1 ,112 ;ir,1 F'11nh 1&•io" ~,!n 2 ,.r\112 2c, Toc n lr.1 11mo .. r..•10 l ,4 J C ,., Ammont1 H'fPIH fmf)f ottn 14; 24,•04 24,404 ,,, A1 viow Os;.ra~ON 0•1• :z: ~.~o 3,tt4U "" 1-t~Oraullc Mooel lrfJ " t ,)28 1,321 300 Procan Dr,Um 1a1IM .. 11 ,:>n 1,072 ""' IIICt'I Mem:i " 7,464 , .... . ., Denltelmpro~t• "' 20,110 20,1'0 .. , EY111u11t1 Dltu1aa1« Suwlv ., ti,/ll 1 ,112 "" 1n1·u m1tn!a~on I nd ?1 og11n n " 2,664
,_
'°' Cro;inwllhnp1w 11mo,,h "' O,'J4oi ..... "" ro:h Memn " ,1i,1 n 3 ,NO
""' Chitmk.11 feed tnd S1mpll1 .. 12,151 ljl,950 '" Reolttoe Plim>g " ,.oo◄ ..... .. , R~lftt1t S1n1Q..,l11,u C0Nh.!I ,. , .... , .... • ,ru RoplDC& Samp Hng Pu~• ,. '·"" 1 ,301 ... Oetlgn ,.,, ◄4 ,I U ... . .... ,, ... . .... 50,112 .. , OO'W.OHIIJII "" 13.~!.6 0 , .... ,,.., 1,UO 14,tot .. , 90•4 0.$1G n ,., 13,1~ 0 1,500 1,1500 , .... 14,908 603 ~11WllOHIIJ1 100 13 ,256 ""' ,, ... 1,000 ,.aoo ...... co, ea11 e.i,111-11111,1 4 ,844 0 0 ·-
GRAND TOTAL ... 1 ◄0,tn(I ... .... ..... s,na 141 ,7N
huina au.I Oullu,1o WU ,oi..11100 lo "9~10 51 Wtl>14 fltJfflbO r. l o d15pl1y dlcim,t,, Chilf190 tt'ttlo,mal of tlMI CHlf,;
--T1
IVI.EMORANl>UM
TO:
Cit y Council M~·nbcrs
FR OM
DATE
KEliAKIJING :
MayorPcnn CJ
Dan Brotzman, Ci ty Atf rney ""
AUb'UC.I 14, 20 13 l
Refer endum Legi slative v. Admi111 strn t1vc.:.
Citi 1.c n pct1t io nf. may only pro pose an i.nit rntivc or a rcfcn.-ndum Lhat is legi slauvc m
chnra c:er, not adrrunictra tivc See Wit r hrr v C'nnnn C:ity. 7 16 1'.2rl 44 5 (Co lo l4R(,);
.Ma rgolis v Drntrict Court, 638 °.2d 29 7 (Co lo . 1981); Vacucur v C itv of A~[>Cl), 232
P.Jd 222 (Co lo. App 2009): C11l orailu Sw iues v. Bl/.l.1, 14 3 f>.Jd 1127 (Colo . App 2006 ;
am! Wnuht v Ci ty of J..ake woo<I. 608 P .2d 36 1 (Colo . App . 1979).
Sr.c:1io 11 47 of the Englew ood Ho me Ruic Chart ct ir. relevant part :
47: Rcfcrcudnm .
The refcrcndwn shall apply lo all ord in anc es pa ssed by Ccu nct l, except
ord11 1nnccs making 1bc Wx. levy, the annua l appropriation ordina r.ce . or the
ordcnng of nnpr ovcmems init ia ted by pclitiou :m cl 10 b!~ p;tid for in whol r. nr pan
hy sp cc u1l assessments ....
The Colorado Suprc,n c Cour. mling on A uroru · s Chaner language fou nd :hat a
rnferendt1:n wnulci not apply tn si mi lar circumsltmccs, see City of Aurora\'. Z'!t~rdli11g~.
S7 1 l'.2tl 1074 (Colo . 1977). Ir; the Auror• cJsc , • referendum petition was filed nfltT the
Cuuncil µasscd nn ordirum::c: to revise w:1t cr rntcs Aurom's Chan cr rcfcr:ndum provi smn
reads us fo ll ows :
"Tlm referenc\11m shall ap ply to a ll ordinan ces passed by the counci l. except
orciinn nce!. fi xi ns the rate of :ar.:.lion on pro perty cuch year for mw1ic ipal
pu1p t1i.cs1 makms the annu al uppropna tio n, ca llmg n speci al clcclion , or unlt:nut;
unprovcmcnt s in iti alcr1 by petit..ion and to he paul for by ~pct..:i:1 1 ;is~c:s:m1c11l ~ ''
TI·,c Culoriidc1 Suprc:n c Co W1 fo und lhn1 references m nn1111 c1 pal :-hnrtcrs to "a ll
ordmonc cs " hnvc gcncrn ll y been interpreted ;u: meaning on ly ordinances whl ch arc
lc gis lat1vc i11 t.:hmal:lc r The Culuru Jo Sup,crn c Co urt conc lud:d th at the A uro:-11 Churt cr
re~c rved the 1cforcndum power on ly 11!> LO \cgi slalivc ordimrn ccs . Sec al so Wi ll:ht r •J .
Cl!!l!lll.Q!v, 716 r .2d 44 5 (Co lo . 1986), where th e Col orntlo Su preme Court madt: a
i.1mi lrir finctinp, cnn r.e mine a 1,:..1sc ente red into by t.hc City .
Sa le of th e Eng lewoo d Dc:pot is an admiui slr ativc 11u1ltc1 ttul suhJ t.:L:l l •J 11.:fc1 c 11d\Un
CC Ga ry Scars
Lou Ellis
1074 Colo , 671 rAr.111\C: REPORTER. 2d SEJm~s
The r:cht. to h&v c bloc,d t.etLs performml
cannol be denied an in digcnL dcfond11n 1.
withuu t. \'iulating U,c equal prot.cclion
clau se of t he 'Fourt.ec nt.h Am~ntlnicnl of t.hr.
Un ited St.at.er. Constltution .1
[C.] Accord illgly, tho rulu is nmd ,• ah110--
lut.c, and t.hc dfotrlCL enurl ii; din:cterl 1/'1
determine whether th e peti!.i on cr fo , in far.t ,
ind ig,ml uruJ unubll! w p1y for liluod group-
ing tcRtl!. and, if 10, to order l.hc bloocl
grouping tents be me.d e at r.o an t.y tix pen!lt .
CITY 01' A UJtO!tA, Colorado , n Munlc\.
pal Cor,oruLion, Petiti oner,
v.
Jock ZWERDLJNGER, Morr\, Olckhart
and Jo Contes, Individually and ■s re1•·
reaentatives of Ii class of pereon e &ign•
ini: that certain referendum petition
prnte111tint the g-oim: into effect of Ordi•
nanct Nn . 74-146 enacted by the City
Council of the City of Aurorn , Colorad11,
and entitled ''Utility R.ktc1i1i" and e11tab -
Utthini; ro.te,; for water 1crvicc11 in the
City of Auroru, Culonuiu, Respondcntli.
No . f,-1102.
S1:prcme Cou rt of eo:o~:id o,
E:i Dan e.
OcL. :Y., 1U7'1 .
Reh earing Denie d Nr,v. i t , 1977 .
City filed d r.claraLur y judb'lllt!Rl .1cliun
si•ok ing declnrutior. lhu l orclinam!c rn:ainr.
rnl.ur, nnd chnrgcJ. for wal.er ~upp \iecl by ci ty
WW.I nol 11ubjocl to r1i f1:ren du m JJroccss
Thl! Di11l rict. Cou rt , Arn µo.h oc Co unty, M. ·o.
Shivers, Jr., J., found orrlin1t.r.cc Willi uol
l. Oth er court~ hnvc chnracler ize d patr.:mily 11.c•
ti un s as bem i: "q\les i-crimina l" in nature .ind
!l ave nm1locize d the cost or bl ood groupl:lc
tesl& lo the cost of tr.31 trlf\strip~ in crimine.i
acUon, un~er Grtf tln v. Jlflr.ois, :m U.S 12, '16
subJt?Cl W r efe:el'lrl um, nncl rep rcs~n:.atives
of dnRi; nf person, sign ing refer1mdum peti-
tion appen\ocl. Th e Court of Appenl s, 5!iR
P.U 90 E, rc\lcracd and rcmllnd ed with di-
rections, an<l cit.y nought. ccrtiora.ri . The
Supreme CourL, Eri ck11011 , J., held t.t:at un •
dcr ciLy charter ancl Color11.t.lu UJ ,usLit.u i.ion,
ordmll.Pce ruiHing mt.e6 end chnrgca for
wn.te r supplil!d by ci t v Wilfi adminielraLiv c
ord inance not auLjcct· tu rf!ferendum pow-
er,;.
Tlt!v;:Mn1d nnd returned with rli rcdinnr..
I. St,,tul•• <>= 302, !142
'l'erm~ o{ AtJl.tR. enn 11(itutionnl artide re -
serving inilintivc nnd refcr1mdum pnwe:-f. lo
tho JICoplc arc Lo be libornll y construed t.o
eCft:ctuau: tht!ir purpo5c , Cnnn1.. nrt.. 5, § l
cl tlClJ ,
2. Stolllt .. =30:l, :143
CoNtitutional articl" rmmrving in itia•
tivc nnd rc.forendum pow<.'l'S to the people
npplic11 oniy to actll wliich W'C legisle.tive. in
churucLtr t1.11d not to aclmi nistroti ve actiono .
ConBt. ort. 6, § 1 el 11eq .
3. M uni r.i pnl Corporalioru; 0:;r, 108.5
.U rc.fo r e ndum powers roacrw:id hy city
charter cx:cucd powcro rcoorvod by the
St.ale Conali t u tio n, tho1:u: powers are opcru-
tiv e nnd will be giv t!n dfoc1.. Const.. art. 6,
§ l et aaq .
~. Municipnl CorporRtionJ: 11::::», 108.M
Aururn cit.y chnrlcr whi..:h provided
th at refett'!ldum puwel' u.pplicd Ul "all ordi-
nnnccs " e.xcepl four listed 1.;xcm 111.ions
would be co nstruef. to rCHervc referendum
pnwt!r 011\y ILB Lo all lcb,jRllltive urdmnncefi
with th ? c-xce plion o! !our ex empted ma1.,-
um1. \.on.i;t . arl. 6, § l ct aeq .
a. Mun u:ip!U.1 CUq,urnlium -= 108.B
Generul\y, mum c:1pal coq,ornLlo n'B RC·
tions wh ich r clat~ to m1bjc ct. of u pe r ma-
nent. or general cfl a.ructer are l!.!gisl:ltiv e,
whilu lh oie Rction s which urc te mporary in
ope ratio n und e!fccl arr 1111t
S.Cl. 58!,, 100 L..Ed . 89 1 (195 6;. Se!! W,1;1/k e.~ v.
StoHes, 45 Ohio /\pp.2d 27!1, 344 N.f..2d 159
(1975); Commonwealth v. >'oss~hl, 355 Mus.
57~. 2~6 N .£.2<1 6G1 (1909).
CITY O F /,U IUtltA ,, ZWEI\DLINGER
Clh1 u, f.olt., ~11 1'.:td 1014
6. Munici1 1a l Co rJJurnli111 1i. ¢=> JO b.7 , lllrl .8
Mu mc1pul cu rpo riuion':1 a :u tha~ arc
nccc!ilmry Lo carry oul c x:i!!Ling lc:c is!i1l1vc
rm!a c1~ an <l 11urpmc:; ur wh i::.h urc prnp c:rly
d 1~ra r.leri 1(:1l us cxcculm! urc g~11cr:11ly
1ltoe m1 •tl tJ + bt au mm i!i lrilli ve, while acL11
co nst1t11ting n ileclarall o1. of puhli :: policy
are dec m~d \)1 he legi~l:i.L1vc.
7. Mun iclpul Corµurnlions ~ 108.i
ULiliL)' r:n c o-c1inan ces arc mlr 11111l:i l ru -
Livc in cha racter.
R. l\111n ici1,nl Curporntinus e=o 108.7
City ord inn nc•• which rniscd utili t y
r:ltt!S was adm im :.:t.r :1ti ·11: in ch araclcr a nd,
lh!I &, wab not s ubJPr.l 1,1 nif ern:,duni µowers
rc:icrved Lo A uror.i electors by e1 t hf'r C:ulo,.
rnd o Cor.i:.t.itu:io:i or A u rora :•lmrlP.r
Cena: Ht. 5, § l '!t. irnq .
L,c urnd M. Coul ter, R1 chn rd Knulmnn
Aurorn, for petitioner.
Rnt\N & nufLy. Rnhcr L A. Duf1.y, Denver
fo-rl!s 11011d en ts
D11 wii uu Nagc ., Sherman & Hownrd ,
Rol.Jcrt M John~on, M1d 1ucl :.... Cheroutcs
Jan e E. Rot,crts , De r.ve:-, ru r u111tcw; •.:urit1!.!,
The Colora do Municiplll Bo nd Dealt~r:; A~M,.
Clllllm , Inc.
Susan K. Griffiths, Wh ent Rni gc, fo r am i
cus curia e th e Colorado Muni cip al l..c:tg ue
e;J :I CK80 .~, .lust iec .
We gr:1 ntcd cer l1or nr1 w rev1r>w the i:uurt
or :l f\jlC:1l s' lh•ei~ion in c ,r.y of Aur o:-:, I'
Z11•1.ud /m,:m, Colo .Ap p., 5;18 P .2d !J9R (!CJ'Hi).
01 1 J·J \y ?l, t~fl.1, th e Aurora City Co u ncil
cnnctcd Onlln an ce Nu. 'M-14 6, raisin~ the
raU!!i amt char Ecs (o r wa ler sup plie d Uy the
ci ~.v Th is ordi11a 11cc wn.s pa.:;11eti to ~:it,sfy
t h: re111iircm crn L-; of Ordi nn11 cl:' No 73-~1
Ill t he earlier orcltn:rn cc, the city hml aulho-
ri~crl the l~'\uu nce of certain ho1trl !i nn d cov .
cn:rnted "Lh ;1t it will csLn b lish, rnn intain,
co ll e~t anrt e11force n1 tcs nnd cbnn:e.s fo r
t ~c connec ti o11 to use of anrl scrv ic~s fur•
ni!hed by lhr rn:,n 1c 1pal wa le r !yslem of
t l:e Ci:y. " 'f'hl' rP.v ;1 11 ues Lhu ;
e,ncrn 1.cd , tng ct her wit h n h r,-.1v ail nLle
lR ~ ~rocee di;, wur C' co1.1c.nrnn 1r,rl in li p .s u f fi.
cient t c, µay t ~e cos ts or oiicr.i Lio n and
m1u 111.Cnnn-:e uncJ lhc: prin cip ul um.I inU:tt:SL
on the bonds .
.A. rd crcn<lu 111 p1ili lio11 demand ing Lhe r t.:-
11~11 or Ordm :ui ce No. 7~-14G or its subm H,-
s1 on tu u 'l ntc of the qrn .l iri od d t:cto·s of
Aurnru w ;ii; 1.uhs~qucnlly fil ed w,th the
city . T ht· pr.:.ilmn was proµt!r in al'. pr~c-
Ju ra l r11,;prr,lf; and wn.."> tim ely filed . Auro -
r:i. refuse <: tu rl"'f)"n l ih r, nnl inirnc f' or Lo crdl
an clect,o n an d filed a n aclin11 ~Pelti ng riP M
d :.rn tory j udr,mi=nl.
'!'h2 Lria l co:Jr t tmt:m:tl u thida nw:·y
Jti dgmeni. in t-~im tr of Aurora, hold ing th:...L
th i: ord inanr.u wa.'i not subject t.o the ra ~!!r -
c nd um µroce11'i . ':he cou rt or 11 1>peal .; re -
..-crscd, holdi ng ~'1at t he AurorJ City Char -
ter pnmded t hat u refc:-endurn coul:1 be
np pli~d tn "all oNlinn.nccs," un less 9~c;f:-
c:ill y cxc ir.pt ed . S,incc no exem ption exis t•
ed io r ulil ity rutt· ,1rd inances , Lh e prese nt
or:i inan:c was , in the opinion of the coL r t of
cppcals , subject to Lh e rcfe:-cndum JXIW Cr .
Wf. revers ! th e cou rt of up pcals .
Petitioner City :,f Aurorn 's prim~ry :1.ll t>M
gnli on of erro t" conccrn2 t he co ur t o:· a.p•
pcul :.:' 111to::rprct.utiou of th o rcfcreDdu m
powers reJc r vc d by the Colo rad o Constitu -
tiu n and the Aurora City Charter. '!'wo
4Ll!!li.iu 11:s uf fi r!ll 1mp re.'\5 iun are prC!lcn tt:d :
(I) Do the rcfon.rn Uum powcrb III Lhis r.'.l se
npp ly LO 1:dmi nist~ativc, as wt:11 ,,s legisla-
tive ::ic.m n9'/, :mt.I (2) Ir, a m un it.:ipu t urrli -
nnnct• wh ich mere:~!!:; utility ""a :.es an 111 l-
m1mstr;1t 1ve :1r lcgt ~l •• u, c nct 1011?
Ar t 11,:h: V of ti it.: Colorado Co n3t1luLH111
rcscr vtS Lhc i11it intiv 1: ~ml rderc ml um JJO W
er.. lo lh e people!"
"5e::t1011 1 G~nc:-a l :1:\SCtnhly-in1 l:a-
l i\•e and refe rer.dum . The IL•g,s!attvc
po wer uf th e state shnll be vened m t he
ge ne ra l assem bly con s1sli11g of II srn ;LtC
and hous e of rc 1,rescnlatives, bo:h lo be
elcc tl!d by the ~ecpl e, :>u L t he peope r e·
se:-vt' to Lhcm st!lves th e powe r to propo se
ln ws anti amend me nts ..o the conslitut,on
and lo en ac t or reject the su me at Lhc
polls
1076 Colo . f>7l PACIFIC K1'1'UHTER, "d SERIES
"The initiative und re ferendum powers
re6crved to the peopl e hy this section ar'.!
hereby furLi cr reserved Lo the legal vr1\.-
e:s of ever;t city , tovm and muni:ipaH.y
w to nil loe&I, speci11 l and municipa l lei!',',;.
l,1tion of ercry chuactar in or for their
reapedlv c, mnnic lpnlilies. The manner of
exen:iaing s11.id pnwel"II &hall be !}m!Cribed
by convral lows, cxcepl thRt. r.itie.'i , town,.
and munici?nlitit:e may provide for the
run.r.ncr of exorc ieinc t he initiative ond
refertndum powcro a,; to their municipal
legi,la ~ion . . " (Emp~u.nir. adde d.}
[I ) We have h,ld tha: the pur po,c of
the!e constitutional pro1i1ions u; Lo expcdl•
tio ualy permit the free exerci&e of legisla-
tive power by the puople . Brook.~ v. l.abka ,
168 Colo . 266 , 450 P.2d 668 (1969): Brnwn -
/o~ v. Wunsch, 100 Colo . 120, 88 P.2d 776
(1938). Th e tcnns of she orticl,, being a
re!lerv l\tion of power! to the J1eopl e, are to
be liben1.lly ronRtrued to e ffect uate U,eir
purpo11e. C'.olo r1tdo Project-Cammon Cau.,e
1•. Andcrso11, 178 Colr-. 1, 49 5 P.2d 220
(1972); Burb v. C1tJ1 of La.lB _:,ette, 142
Colo. 51, 34 9 P.2d 69 2 (1960 ).
f?J The in tention eviden ced by Article V
of the Co lorado Constit'Jt1 on is lo vest only
legi.shiti ve pC1wer dire ctly m the peopl e.
The lnnruage of the article it.sl!lf refers
specifically to the initi,dve and referendum
powers 18 th e meane by wh ich the peopl e
car. exercise the le~slati •e power ll is
11\30 not unimportant t~at ~~eae powers are
:-er.e r"ed in t:i e n.rt ii·IP. nf our Co nstitution
which dea lli expressly nm1 eit1g11l:1r ly wit h
the logialntiv e branch of governmen t. We,
lhcrcfore, cono truc th o c<t nntitutionr.1 provi •
:iio:1~ Lo appl)' unly to 1\Ct.s which urc lcgie Ja .
Li ve III d111.rac1.Cr, whi ch i:. com1 i!1Lenl wiU1
the majo ri ty view . Cljrscm 1•. O.H~tduwdle1,
3.11 S.W.2d 3'J 4 (Mo .Ap p.1960): /(eillloY ,.
llench, Y'/ Ulllh 6~. bH P.2d 4RO (1 939 ); ,ce
a/so Peap/M' -Grnham , 'IU Colo . 509, 203 P.
277 (1 921).
Thl• City of Aurora C.hnrtHr ulso rese rv es
Hu: rofc re11Ck m power to lhe pP.npl e Arli •
cle VI, Secti on '1 of lhc ChnMer provid ~.111 :
"Th e rcfenrndum ~hall appl j' Lo ~11 ordi
nPr.cea pas se d Uy Lit~ cuum:ll, excepl ordi -
n&nce! :ixm & th e rate of l.axuliuu uu
property each year for municipal pur•
fJOBf!S , ma.kine Lht annual appropriation ,
cnl!ing u epe ci u: election, or ordering im-
provements iniliaicC by petition and to
be paH for by spec ial we.smumts .
[J] ~ulwiths!.llndlng Uie limilllti on of
Lhe cons:j t u t.lonal referendum power t.o leg•
11\ativc £C lions, the terms of the Cit.y :;1u1r•
t.er mu."lt be ex amined Lieeau11e the :w o res-
ervatiom are independent of each other
1'he Charter pro vl11ion! cannot limit powers
rc11crve cl by Lhe Conelit ulion . However , if
lh e pow ers reserved by the Ch&rter exceed
the powers reserved b}· the Constitution,
thoae powers are .:>perative and will be giv-
en effect Burks ,,. City of W a.Yctte, SU•
prF.; 1.ioar!h & A r nnld Homes, Jnc. v, City of
Boulder, 82 Co lo .App 16, f/J7 P.2cl 476
(!973).
[4] Anrorn',-ChllrU!:r provides tha t the
!'eforend um power applie11 tn "al l ordi-
nn ncc t" except tho fn ar litl.ed exr.mp ti omt
Re.,pondcnto contcn hut thir. lnnguugo
must. be rend lit.en 1.1 L!· include th e ordi -
1umct: iti this cn.se . .bul reference., in mu-
:1icipe.l chu.rltm; t.u "a.II ord1T,nnc~" have
generally be~n in 1.crµr elt.'ll u6 mea ning only
onh11snces which are legislat iv e in charac-
ter. ThlS general rule wn& revi cwt.'l! in
Cars on ·,. Uxenlumdler, s upra
"The ru le th11t only i&Cts lcgislati v~ in
thei:-nature ore subject to re!ere ndi;m is
partir.:ilnrly applicable in the field of mu •
nic tpal co rpnrut in ns. Th e legi51 11ti 1e body
of a m1anici p:dity , whe th er it hr de,ig n11t--
ed a ci t y cn unci l, hoanl ol atld cr:.1frn, llr
oLh erwittc , is frequ ent!) culled upo n to act
in an at..l111inii.t.ra.live ll.5 well nc. n higtt:13 •
li ve c.:t.pncily b) t he µ.wu ge ,of ordina nCC3
nnd reso luL1 ons. f+'ro m u11 e,u ly ~11\.c m
:h, histor )' of th e right of refere ndum il
hus lJee.11 rccog1m.cd that t.o auhject t.o
referend um any ordinnnre adopllil by n
city council, wh ethe r ndmin is:ralivc or
1cgislutivc, l!O uid rcaul: in c~uos t.nd the
bringing of t he machine r}' of govc~r.,enL
to a ~al L
. . T ne gene ra l rul , whir.h
hlls Uev cl oped 1:1 at.nLcd in &Jr.on ,,. Lad:-
CI TY Ot AUltUl(A ,. ZWF.IWI.INGER C.:olo . 1077
C11r.n,Colo.,li71 P',::!d 11741
ey, 296 "Y·
foll ows
!SA , l!S:t S.W.i!d :-::H;, 3.16, as or ortlinnnce:s a:-e ndm1ms lrative or l~i!i1a.
"'Althou t:'h mi lrnl.vc ;1111 1 rcfo n.11 -
duir 11rov1 s1 on s wide ly Uiff c:-in Lh cir
lcrm ino loCJ', il Is Lhc Ct.!nc:-a l rul e Lh ut.
LhP)' 11r1• npµl 1c:rnlc o:1IJ Lo il tll' wh ic h
u ·c lcchlu !J v1• in rh:1r:1rl.Cr, :uul 11n1 l o
those dealing with :1tl m 1r.ist rnlive o r
execu t i ve m:i.t.l crs.
"I n utcunfoncc with Lh t:1 ·uh: t.lu:: ""01'1.hl
'a nl ortli n unr.:t:' 111 c p1u\'i~it111 fu r rdtrcn-
d um hav:: fre;i ucntly, and almu sl u111ver-
Nllll.v, been co:,s lru ed to m~nn orc.hn unce s
wtu ch cm: l21,'1 slr.L1\'C 111 charac ter . Kc.•sg-
lcy , •. Benc11 , 97 Li lah 6Y , 81 P.2d 480, I~
A.LR. 756' Til/11 mnok Feopics' Uiilily
Distric t ..,_ Cou tes , 174 Or. t.76, 149 P.!!d
55S : Cooli ng "· C:ty Council cf City ,f
Fitchburg, supra) 242 Mus,. 5'J9 . 136 N.E.
616; Hoppi11g 11. Counci1 of City of Ric/J-
mn nrl , 170 Ca l Gilf1, lfiO P 977 "
We i;on cl udc thnt the Auro:-n Charlet re•
:,er"cd the referendum power o nl j as lo 1dl
lcg 1slut.1 ve ordmanees w1Lb \lit cxccµt 1u11 v(
the iour c>.c1.1p lctl muller:; Wh :::thcr Lhc
four exemp ted mitten; arc legi!)l:Lti vc or
ndm1mst.rat1ve so not lO hrw ~ bee11 :iubJec t
to th e re:ere ndum in !.he first Inst.1nce neeli
not bt! addressed.
ll.
f~. Ii ] Nu merous t :l'J. hi.ve hce n cm•
ploye rl by variou.1 cn urLo:: to <.eLe r r:iim•
wheth er 11 pnrlu:ul:ir orcl ir1 :in r r, i~ lr c i'>lnli'r r
or mlmin ·sLra tt vl' It l::t:; hccn hdcl tha ' :111
nr.t 1,111 li mt ri·l ntci, t u :u:bjccts uf u pe m m-
nc u . or ge ~u rul ch nr111:Lc1 urc lcgi:1 lot 1vc,
wh ile l hcsc whi ch urt l\!mpon&r)' 1n op ::r u~
li o11 nncl effect 111·c 11ot . All11itivmdl}'t 11cl:.
lhil t ur c llf:L\.!S:;;u·) L11 carry u11 l c ,-:1s :1111,;
lc1_...'"lslativ ~ pulici~~ ;md J)Urpose, or wiuch
urt: µr op,rl.\• chnr:icLentccl u.,; cx ecut1vr wre
tlet!:med :o Uc a1!m1n1s tr:il111e, witil~ :t els
consti t uting a d~clara t1 on of pJblic p<ili cy
a re rlet ml?d to bt ltigisl:.itt vc Wh i!che11 rl ,,
H nnd C D~vtJ /01m1c11I Carµ., 204 Vo.. l4",
129 S.E.2d 69! (1 9G 3): Keiclr.y , Ren ch,
suprn ; No naluw ,, Fw ,k, 137 0:-f>S0, 3
P.211 77 8 1l !l'JI).
StJb3 tnnlial d 1:silb'TCCmc nt e~is ls m dirfer •
cn l Ju risri 1ct1o m) at. :o wht!t he r certa in t ype!<>
Liv t:, Such ir. l ht( r.n.'ic wit.h rnJmcipu l ord i-
nu ncei. which set. ulilily r11 t.cs . {I McQu il/in,
Mun it:11ml Cor,1tmll w11s, 3rd ccJ . §& Hi.lfi ,
IG5 7.
'71 ~onc·.htlc.~s, w t Lrc in ag·rcl!1 rn.n t
with lhu."A: Ju ri1dict1011:. w,11 ch ltuhl l h:tL
utili ty ra ll' onlma.u c,:s arc ad ministrative in
ch!lra cv~r Ttn· rcasonli for lhis co nclusion
arc wel c:quc~t!:d iu Whi 1e t:c11d ,,. H um, C
Dtvc/01,mcm Corp., suprti :
"The succcs~fu l operation of a puhhc
uL ility is ti b usm c. rroµ1.111ition invo lv in~
thr-exerci!c of discret ion 1rnd ~oo~ judP,~
ment in ma1111gcrnenl F.xpe n11 cs inci dent
and cs!lc ntin l lo proiicr 01>cra:1 0.i ar c nct-
tss1 rily baseC on th e co11 t of luhor, ml\le--
ria ! and oth er fA ctnrs ni thP tim e the
11:e rvirei; ar• ren rlerecl . They are of s uch a
fl ucluRt mg nature, due to ccono mir: and
other temporary con dit,onL, 11~ to mn ltc il
imprucli:ul, if not 1mpo3:iiblc, fur fae s e n-
<:rul pu t lic W appraist them in th e ao-
sc nce of 5µ,t!cific dcta. !u cb uml infurnn1,
t1un 11eceM11ry lo nrrivt! Ill u fuir tt1 1J
.,ccur1t lc judi;mtml upon the Eu bject
The cnan ging experuc h ctor goes to th e
\'cry hea rt or the operatmn .
"W hile the estah ii5h ment of th,: city-
owned waler sys tem may hav e been :n
pur.rno.nc~ of a Uroad publi c policy und.
t.h~re fur e. a lt:t,ri sla tiv(' mnllcr, th P ri••
c:ci pl!; and CX flt'11~1~ 1n r1clr>nt:il to b
r'l:11 11 1,•nnurc ;i11d mar111go m1:ml :ire c,cecu
l1Vl o, :idmi11 i'-l l':1l1vc n11,1Ltcr:-•. It :; clu.r
l h:i~ Lh l! wnv.uiun:. of lhc pro1t1J:n!!l onlt ·
nn nc c of th e cltclors an: :zn:tcl) tcm)IU
ror v m oucrnLiu n aml cfrt:cl Th\! unit,
1111 1;1.:\! 1!u~~ not pru µmu: w m.ik u n ll ll'"
la w: il is one CieCJ tmg a law alren.riy 111
existenet, me rely chan(:ln g an cxpen~<'
factor III th e rnai nlenan ce of a publi c
util ity IL pur:.ucs 110 nt-w policy It
pun111ts a plan already udoptcd by lh c
c,ly Cl'l u nci l Jud~ed hy th c:ic tests, it is
ndm i111stra tivc r.lthcr t:rnn lrgi!'lla l1v P ''
(8] Such on upptoilc h ruulb III l ht' i.:u1 •
clu ?1io n thnt the chullt!ng ~d ordi nan ce in t his
c.i111c was ml111 1nist1'3the 111 ch ar3C I.Cr . Since
thi.: unJu:unce wns :ulmln istra :1vl! rn ch ar ac-
ter, 1t \q\s not !I UbJ~:t to l ht' refe rend um
107S c,,10 611 PA CIFIC llEl'[)l(TER. 2d SERIES
powers ro~crvo d lo i hc Aurorn olocLors by
either lhc Co lorudo Connt1Lulion or the Au •
torn CharLer
Acwnlingly, the judgment is re veraed,
und thl' r.:au11c i6 returned lo ~he oour l or
uµpctLh; for remnnd, with directions t.o rein ·
11ULlc the trial court', j udgmcn· ..
KELLEY , l ,EE ar.d GARRIGAN, JJ., do
no t. p11r~icipute .
The PEOPI.E of th e State of Colorado,
PluintifC-Ap11cll1:c,
Y.
Darrell Vernon PICKETT,
Defendant-Appellant
No . ?7614.
Suprc:nc Court uf Colorad o,
En Bone..
Oct. 24, 1977.
Defe ndnnl wes :onvicted in the Oi i.-
tri ct Cou rt, Arapuho e Cou nty , Richard D.
Gree ne, .I ., oi Celony menacing, µoaoesaion
of an illegal weapon and c,i.rryi11s 11 con •
ccaled weapo n. Defendant nprco.lcd, nnd
the S~preme Cou rt, Lee, J.1 hc id thnt : (1 )
conal itulionul iu:i ul!~ which were no ~
ptc:)cnlcd lo Lhc l rinl ,~ourl o:-otherwise
preserved fo r npJJc lla t.e rev iew wc rn uu t
properly heforc t he Supreme Cour t, (2) cvi -
thrn ce 11ufficicnt 1y supporled llu.: j ur y'5 tl c-
lcr111i111lli o11 t :mt. t.:ic knifr t.nkc n iro111 the
de fo rnl unl w.wi .u "grnvily knife"; (3) cvi •
dtm ce :1urI 11:i c11Ll y csl.ulil i1d1cd th at th e O\'Cr·
nll length of the bludc of the knife tllkcu
from dc fen dnnl WRS more than t h~e nnd
one-half in ches; ('1) id cn tificat1on cv1denr.e
wu s suff icie nt for th e jury t..o !ind that
ticfend nn t wru tn fnc t t he mn n who ru:cost,.
cd and menn r<:?rl the vi:!tirn; (5 ) lhe tria l
judge did not ,.b use discrelmn 1n denying s
severance of th e o!ferm~s , (C} the re wll&
pro~ahll! er.use lo arrc&L defen dant, (7) de•
fenCant was not e ntitled to the aupprea:1ion
of 3 knife scited from him ci.urittt o t1l!ll.n:h
incident to the v~lid orreat, (8) evide11 cc•
nupported i he triul court'11 ruliug U1ul Lht:
ponili\'c in-court idenlificationti or Jc!t:1111-
nnt wcrt: bucd 011 a ro Mur1ahlc op porLu uity
to obecrvc thfl MBnilnnt; (9) nu impro1,1ricty
msult.t:d from Lhc !11.ci Uu1L lht! jury wau1
pcrmitt..e J 1.0 view the photographlr a.~tLY
ahow n t lJ t!lc victim , and (10) no error re•
aulll.'O from admission or tci1li mon y rc lutin g
to e. ll1JLc and f\ dummy o.llt!gedly !ound In
the vic lim'E backyard nrtcr th e att.uck .
A!P med .
I. Criminal Low =-1030(3), 10~(1).
I J3U(3)
Contcn ti o?1, rui:icd 0 11 upµcn l from con•
v1ct1on of .fclo!l)' men/\cing, po1111ession of Rn
illcgu.l weo.pon and carrying a concealed
wcopon, that criminol code eect.iom, uudcr
whi ch dcfcndant..w&r; convict.cd wcl"C uncon-
tSt it.utionully vague und overbruud Willi nol
preserved for rev iew w here <lcfomfant Jitl
not n1ist! t.ht i11suc iu '.he district court or in
!u s ne,.-· t :-ilil 111uliu u u.m.l J ill nol l!'ll!n men-
Lioi1 U11.:: iH11u c in his opening brier to t he
Supreun: CuurL. Col o.R.Crim.P . rule 83(a);
C.A .R. l (d).
2. Crimi nu.I Low <t=o 661 (1)
Test for deLerminiug whe t he r eviJenct:
Wu.ti liUrricicnl lo !tUJlpOM guilty \'CrdicL is
wbe lher the evidence, when vlew,Jd in It.a
· wt.a li t)' anti in the light most supµortive of
Lh c vcnlir.t., is li ufficicnt to support u. conclu -
llion in the mind n of rca.'-!Onnbk pcrsous Lhn :
dc fcndiml is gu ilty beyond a rcuson nbi e
dou bt .
3. Wt:a1 1onfi ~17(<1)
l!.:v.denct: in cluding knife winch Wli6
t.nken t:om defendant nnd dtmmnstr-•• tion of
th e knife's OJ>tmitiun wnrrnnted jury in
fiud ing that lh c knife t.aken fro m defend·
ant was a "brravity kmfe" as 9L1lt.:tu rily
t.lcfined and , t hcreforl.?1 was un ille gal wcap•
on . C.R .S. '73, IS-12-JOI(l)(c).