HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-09-16 (Regular) Meeting Agenda PacketI. Ca ll to O rd er .
2. lnvoca 11 or1.
J. Ple dge oi All e~iance .
Roll Ca ll .
Age n~~ ior the
ReAular Meetin ~ of the
E11 g lcwootl C il y Co uncil
Monda)', Sep tem ber 16, 20 13
7:30 p m
En glewoo ivic Cen ter -Council Cn ambers
I 000 Englew ood P.Jrk way
Engle woo d, CO 80 I I 0
a. M trHlh!~ fr om the Regul ar ltty loun ol 1v1eet1ng o r ~e p te mhe r J , 201 J .
6. Reco ~n 1f 1on o f Sc he d uled Pub li c Comm ~nt. (Th is 1) ,ln opp ·1Un 1ty lor lh e public t ad d r~ss City
Co unci l. Co u ncil ma y ask q u~s rion~ for cla ri fic.11 10 11 . but there w il l n o t ot: ;m y d ialo gu e. Plr:ise hn 11 1
y o w fHP<;e n i r1 1io n 10 fi vp mint11'P'-)
,1 Kay H W iH cl w ill be prese nt 10 di)c uss a Ve 1 r.1 11 ·s ML rn nal a 1 1he n ew f11 glewond l-l 1gh
Sch o 11 ca:io11
J. h:ecogrn t1on o f Unsched uled 1-'ub h l o mme n1. tl his 1-; Jn o pponuni1y lor l hP puo l rc ro addres s C itv
Co u:ic -ouncil mav as k ques tions ior cla nf1ca 11o n, b u l l hcre w ill n o t be ~111 y d1 .1 log 1,e. Pie as e limi1
yo1:r D, n1,11 io n 10 lh rl'c 1rnnut e~. Tirne for un sc hedul ed public c o mm en t rna y h I mi 11•d 10 45
11 .. 11111 s. and ,f l1m11 ed. shall be conti1111 ed 10 Cencr ,il 01 sc11s in11 .)
Counci l Response 10 Pu blic Corn m enl
8. (U1 1111 1w 11LJ ti u 11 :,, P 1u Ll111 1i.111 u 11s, t1r1d Ap poi11uncn ~
Plf',l \f' no1r: If )'Ou h-1 \'C' ,, ct ,~.ih,!ity .-.nci nr •>d .lu"<il,.uy aid~ or se rv icN ~lc,,tSP nouf\· lhc City o f [nglcwond
IJOJ,i 62 ·H 05l .u ll'i!Sf ◄8 hou ,s 1n adv.111ce CJ I \-.hen ~C1\1Ct''> ,,,e needed.
l11sl L1\,000 Cir.· Couu u l Ar,cml,1
Sc>p len•he, 16 ~0 13
P.,g c l
9 Consen 1 Agenda he m s.
a Apµr vJ I or O rcli n,1n ccs o n Fi rs 1 Rea ding.
b Approv,11 o f O rdi n.:mces o n Second Rt:.idi n g.
Council Bill '\J o . 44 -A111hn 11 7mg ;i \N ile.I w.1 t?r ( n nn i:-rc ,,·s Ag1PPm i:>n 1 w1 1h thP Hn\i.,
M.11 \l\'at e r M l d San ita rlon Distr ict
Council Di ll '\Jo . 4 .:i -Au1ho ri 11ng ct \l\';1s 1cv.,11 e1 Cunnector's AgF'emen ·.vi 1h
o lumbm \i\1i1 IL'r t11 1d Sa n iH1 li n District.
i1 1. r ound: Bill \J o. 4 6 -App rcvin g Supplement #~2 to 1hc Connectcr s A r ee ,nen l w 11h
V;"t llf'y ",;i n u,111011 I )1~111r 1 ;u11h o 1111n g 1hr mr lt 1~1nn n l l~1ncl w ithin th rlie',lr,c f
h . Counol B,11 '\J c 4 7 -Ap p rovi ng the p ro p ose d ~O 13 \•Va1er Con sc rv arion Plan .
c Re so lu tions ancf M o tions
1 O 1-'u hh r He:uine I tern s
A Public M .,ring 10 ga th er inpu1 o n the proposed 201 -1 C ny o f Engle w oo d Budge1. t Plc asc
11 u 11: ,1 c...u;Jy u f 1hc µru p o ~e tl 201 4 CH) o f En >(lt\\Ood Bu d~c 1 b a,d ilJl"le for ,iew in g in th e
[ngle ,voo d Publi Li brary du rr ng regul;u bus111es~ ho ur !i an d 0 11 th e: C11y w~bs•te
hl!D //w, "c nglc\,oort1,ov.org /h11 rlge 1)
b . A Publi c t t~armt,: to ga th e 1 in put o n oun c il Bi ll No 21, .1pprovmg the proposed N a\ .JO
Ap ~r1rn r ,w, 1>1~1 111, ... ,1 llrn t I l pvelo m nt
r\pp,0,.1 1 o f O rdil"ltlllCCs o n F1 rs l Re th ng.
b App rov.1 1 o ( O rrli nann~s o n Seco nd Re:irling
c Rc~u l u1lu ns and Mo 1io11 ~
Re~om mcnd,i1to11 fr o rn the Pi'ul,.s dlld Re(re ..it u11 D t:µJ1l 111c 11l tu ,1p µ1 u ,~. by 111 u tiu11 , .i
c on1rac 1 fur the c.onsrr ucuon o f rh e S11 pplerncrnr1I [nvir nmt:n l ,1 1 Pro1ccts T,,,il
Co1111cction Projec ts 10 1h e lowcs1 accep table bi dd er. R1 c h de ll Co n Hu c tio n , In c .. 111 th e
am o unt o i S50,8HO . St;iff So urce: Oa\C lee , M.i n age r of Open Sp.,ce .
Plea\c no 1e· It vo u h.1ve ,, chs 1t,i h1y ,111cl need au'<~1 ~rv a,ds or serv ices µlea~c no ufy 1hP G tv of Frig lew ood
(JQJ.;C,?.:?•WJ) .it lc ,1 ~1 110 hou,s 111 J d,·,111cc of w he:1 ,en.ices .ire nccdt-d
(11g lc\, ood C11y Cou ncil A send:.
t;t>jl lf'm h ,., H,, ?n i l
P.1g1: 3
12. Gene rc1I Disc uss ion .
a. f\ \Jyor'!i Choice.
b Cu un <.il M ember s' Choice.
1 J. (ily M anag er's Rep ort .
111. Ci 1y All ornc y'!i Rep o rt .
15. AdJo rnnm ent.
Ple .1.st: ,10 1e· If ~ou ha \'e ;i c!1s.i b1 hty Jnd n ~ed au-<i~.lrv .1 1d s 0 1 scr.1ces ple.i se no11f) th P (1:y of Englewood
(JJJ.7&7•240 5) ,11 lea s1 46 hows 11 1 ,1dv,1nCl' o f \\htm ;(•1v1c es .11._> fl l•ed ed
""'"' n.oro:.\
• •~• o ,:.pe,
.. _,.i.~-.
i<
The EHS Veteran's Military
Memorial is Dedicated to all
those who have served in the
Military and have attended
Englewood High School. _ .... [r\i i . ;...:_,,.. __ -:...-
i -
l
'~ ~,4 -
YOUR NAME OR A
VETERAN'S PERMANENTLY
ENGRAVED AS A PART OF
J~1-4
t ;
:-.:. ...-
•·'(
Englewood High
School
Military Monument
Foundation
~ Monument in c-
' PAj,ellft AROU1: MONUMeNT
.L ";"-
;,,~: C 'P· .• ~&;,; ~--!e• ft ~ ··•----~
SERVICE SEALS & PLAQUE
ARMY, NAVY, MARINES, COAST
GUARD & AIR FORCE
& NATIONAL GUARD
Home of the Free
Because of the
Brave! ,..
~ ...
a-te. .... Woodwanl
EHSAl-'and
Y-'-of WWII (claes of 1935)
A monument will be
placed at the newly
remodeled school
campus at 3800 South
Logan Street
A "1o un t u l ,noney c o l lec l e d V¥ill d •1am1ne lhe !>I Z e to n rl
c.h o ,c e o l th~ M o n u m en t.
Zip:
ome phone
' -~~
See Face book
""ENGLEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL
MILITARY MEMORIAL""
Make check payable to:
"59ers MMF c /o EEF"
59&•~ M ,l,ta ry M e m or1;il
E 1191 e -GOO'J Eo u c a11onal F o unda t ion
Send check to:
Kay Howard 303-740-8789
241 Kelsey Place, Castle Rock , CO
80104
kay cas tlerock li"comcast .net
2. Buy a Tile for a Vetera n
Is there someone yo u
want to honor?
3 . CONTRIBUTE TO 1·HE
" REMEMBRANCE FUND'
This fund i s for those wh
need fianacial assistance
Pavers with Alumn i nam e
4x8 = $150.00
8x8= S200 .00
12x12= $300 .00
Special Paver w i th Veter an
name {include Branch o r
Service ) with persona
information 11 -e
Large only12x12 $300 .00
PUBLIC COMMENT ROSTER
AGENDA ITEM 7
UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC COMMENT
September 16 , 2013
PLEASE LIMIT YOUR PRESENTA ION TO THREE MINUTES
PLEASE PR INT
NAME ADDRESS TOPIC
-------------
Simon Center
2013 Election Foru1n
Simon Ce nte r will be holding th e fir s t C andidate/I ss ue Forum
for the 2013 election thi s c o min g Tuesday .
Simon Center
Tuesday September 17th
Starting at 6:00 p.m.
1st Floor Community Room
3333 South Lincoln Street
Englewood , CO 80113
Light refreshments will be served
Please call Elaine Hults 303-781-0198
If you have any questions or need additional information
•
•
•
OY AUT HORITY
Ul(U I A Cl:NU.
SE RrES OF 2013
COU:-IC IL B U.L NO . 44
INTR ODUCED BY CO UN CIL
MEMB ER WO ODWARD
AN ORDINAN CE AU TI IORIZ ING A INTE RGOVE RNM ENTAL WASTEW;\TER
CONNECTOR 'S AGR EEMENT BETW EEN BO .V MAR WATER AND SAI\ITATI ON
DI STRICT A:-JO TH E CI TY OF ENG LEWOO D, CO LORADO
\VHEREAS . lhc C11 y of En glewood owns and oper~tes :,, sew.1ge system, !nc lu:11ng a sewage
1n·nl rn l·nt pla n! w hi ch 1'i j oint l} ow ned ;inrl n pera 1cd with 1he f 11 y of I .i11 lc1o n knnwn ;is 1hc tJ F.:
Wa slew:,,ter Trc:m n cm Plan ! (\V\VT P); :md
WHEREA S, the I · WWTP p1ov1dcs san irnr y s ewc 1 sc 1v icc to di stii ct :; outs ide of the
Eng l cwoC'lc , co rpora1c bound arie s 1hrough ~ stnnclard co nnector'!> agrcc mc n1: an d
\VH EREAS , the Dow Mar \\later and an11atio n Distn ct dcsm:!-IO utihzc th e IJF. \V\\IT? for
treatment of1 hc D1s1rici 1s se wa ge ; and
WI IER.E J\ , the Bow M::r Water and San it::u ion D1,;;tnc t has app rox1 ma1e ly Q \ 1:i pt;; anrl
WI LERE A . 1li e U r W\\TP 1s ::i 1tu:ucc\ physica lly as to he r,0lc 10 rccc 1vl! aJJd 1rcat 1hc ,cwagc
from a des ig n.1 1ed area serv ed by rhe Bow Mar \Va rcr an Sanitat1 n Distnc t a nd gm hcrcd by 1hc
D1s tn c1 's sa ruta ry sewag e sys te m; and
WH ER EA S, Bow Mar Water and San jt at ion Distncl will co nt inue 10 O\VI\ the li ne s a nd w ill be
re spon sible fo r capit al 1m;Jro vcmcnt s anJ 111ain 1ena11 ce III i1 s sys 1cm ; and
WH ERE AS, 1hc Englewoo d \Va 1cr :in d Sewer Boa rd 1cvicwcd an d reco 111111 cndcd np prov:il o f
the Oow M.ir \Va ler and Samrn11o n D1stric1 W?.stcwatcr Co nnect or 's At-'t'cc mc t at th e June 11,
20 13 m~tin g;
NOW , T l IJ:REFOR E, BE IT ORDAIN LD BY TH E C ITY COLIN 'IL OF ·1 Il l: CITY
ENGLEWO OD , 0 1.(JRADO . AS FO LLOWS:
Sec ti on I ·n 1<.' lm ,·rgovenun ental Ag.reeml·11 t bc :w ecn th e C11 y o f Engll·,vo od a ud Bo,,• M:1r
W:111::r and S:.J11 1tat1 on D1 s1nct ent lll ed i.wastewa tcr Co n11ccto 11 s Agr eeme nt For Di stri cts''!'-
hereby ap prove d, a co py IS a11 ac hed here to ns bhibit I.
Scc 11 on 2. TI1e M;i)O r is <1u thonzed lO c:'(cc ut c and Cit y C lerk t att es t :mct sen I th e
ln tcrgovc mmcnlH I "\V as tcwat cr Co 1mcc tor·s /\gre emc n1 ··. for and on be half o f tht: En glewoo d
Cuv Counc tl.
q b i
l11 1md11cert , rea d l'l fu ll , and passe d on fir s, read mg on the 3rd day of Se pt ember, 2013.
Pu bli~hcd b) T itle as a Bill for ;111 O rJ irnm i.:c i11 the C it y"s offi c ial news pa per on th e 6u. duy of
Sep,ember, 20 13 .
Pub lishe d as a 8 !1! fo r an Ordi nance on the City',; o rti cial web~it r hrern nmg on the d1h c1ay n t
Sc:p 1cmhcr , 211 11 for llmt-y C O) days .
Rc.,d by 11tl e an d passed on fin al rend ing on th e 16th dn y or Se pt ember, 20 I :1.
Pub li shed by 1i1 lc: in the C11y 's offic 1:.l news paper :\S Ordinan c e No _, Scm·s o f 0 1 \ ,"'In
1hr 20th rl;iy n t Scplem her .!O I~
Puli lish ed by ti lie un th e C1t(s oriidul web .s ite bcgi nrn ng on the 18th d:1 y vf
Scp 1c 111hcr, 20 13 fo r thirty (30) day
Loucris hrn A. Ellis, Cuy C lerk
I. Louc ris l11 a :\. Ellis, C ity Clerk of the Cit y o f Englc"oo;, Co lorn do, hereby ce rtify tha t th e
nbovc :rnd fo regoing is 3 tru e co py of the Ord m:rn ce passed on fin:i l re:idmg and publi shed by
111 lc as O rdi n:mc~ Ko ._. Sen cs o f 20 13.
Loucrishb A. Elli s
•
•
•
•
•
•
\\'ASTEWATER
CO NNECTOR'S AGREEMENT
For Distn:1s
Sewer Contract No
'HIS AG!1.E::r,..n:NT, ::nn dc and ente re d ml n th 1~. ____ day o f
f./19/20 12
Rcv 1s1o n
-------~ 2.0 _ 10 he cfiecuvc n: o~· , 20_, by ::md
bc1wcc n th:: CITY OF EN GL EWOOD, CO i ORA DO, 1 r.,umcipa l corpor:1 t1on, hcrc.:rnnficr
referred to as "Cu}," r1c:in r: by d!l ll through ,t., du.ly ele:.1 cd , qu/\ltiicd .i.n d autho nz1.;d Mf:yc r t.m\
Cny Cle:k, and the 0 0 \V !vfAR WATER •\ND SA! ITA ~ON DIS"!RI CT, J q u .:!.1•11.111:t.c1pa l
co r:10:-a non and su bdivision of the St al~ ofColorn do , herdnJftc1 ::t:t lk J "D1s 1r.d," o1 1;111 1g l,y dHti
ihrou gh its ;,uthonzec J<.cpr cs cntat 1vc.
WITNE SS E l'i I
\1/11 ER.EA5, the Cit}' owns .-i.nd opr.rates e sewage sys tc11 :, mc lud 1nc a se wage trea tm cm pla nt
\./luch 1s jo:n'.'.y owned and o;,tr.l lcd with the Ctry of L:ttletun, so SIIU:lted phy s ica lly as to be
obh.: to rc:cc:ive and tren! th: scw~g c fr o:n a d:sigmited ar ea serJed by u:.e DlSlnct ond g=ithercd by
Li e Distii ct's samt nry•!>c:wage system; and
'.VI IE R r-A ), 11 1t: 11c dc.t:1re of the Dis tn c~ to u1i li zc :he fac1hti::s c,v. ncd by the Ci ty for th e
, ·,:.:1 t:re:1t of s::wa g::: encl the City 1c; wi[mg l0 ~Cl'\C thL· O•cmicl frn 1rea lru ::1l c f s.~wagr.: undc1
ce 1n m conduior.~:
NOW, TI !ER EF ORE, TN CO NSI:)RRATION of th1. p:-um11:cs: n.mJ ior ot her good nnd
vJ u.il,Jc cons:de.J at ion r.crcinef1cr set fo nh. it i:i mu tJaHy agreed :J >• the p:mu:s 3s: fol1C1,'-'s ·
The City hc n.:by ag1i.:c~ under the .:.oo diticms h ereinafter set fo rth, 10 lrcot tb: !-cw ugc
orig111a 1ing fro11: th e D1s111c t's ~aiUtu r>' ~ewer ~yS ll:11 1 w itl.in th: ucc s:rvcd by the
Dtstn ct as app roved by the City il nd as mdio.Hcd m the dcsl:11~\lC/l e.tt acbcc he1 c101
incJrpo ratcd nc rc L1 and ma rk ed as ''Ex ;1ib il A"
The C1:;tnc l spc:1fi ::ally agrees :o pr evem sc wti ge from a:iy arcn other than 1h,1l
dcscnbcd hc:cir., fr om being di sc har~cd into the D1nn::t 's snm 1a1• :;cwagc s>'stcm
col'J1cc tc<l 10 :he City's tru.n}: h:1l· and to pr e'lcnt connc:ctions t~ 1:i.c sy:il cm f10111 01 w
un" a1co o:hc:-thun those <l t~cnbe~ b.:nac
In the Of)era11~;; ... f thz D1 st.rict'.> sau1 la ry se wer system, the :>1s 1nc1 ,1 grees lha l all
~p~hcctbk ('Qrlt' ;,1nvio:;inns nn d rul es ..lnd rel:u lat 1oni of t c C ity, mcludl:l,.: mncn dmcnti
thecto dunng thr· ·r-rm nf thr. cn ntrnr.l, ~hall he th e mir.imum stananrd!. fo 1 the D1s1 n ct 's
sys:ci:i . The D1stnct furthe1 agrees 10 ab ide b y nll a;,p lim1 hl e staic and federa l l2ws,
ru l~. rcb,u la 11om, :n pc:mits, incl udin g lhos~ of 1:J.c Envi:onm:.n1 ;il ".lrot~ct1 01~ Agency
(the EPA ) os :hey beco me cff cCli \.C or impl eme nted or u pon notic e froi:n !he ('i1y "ll~f•
Di s1nct shzU !nfor:n all users, co:nr:ictors .ind su bc oo trJ.ctors of men s1a..1.da1 cis, ru:es :-ind
re g.1 laLio11s u.,oo mquiry fro m such ~crsons, and. shat! no\ fcm.i.:;h lDY mformat1on
im .. uus1:,tc11t l'.1 c1cwith . 1n th.is regard, i! shall be the 1c.'.i pons ib 1hty of chc D1stric1 to
ob1am the app licahlc I c:~1u11c::11:nt:. f10111 the: :1 pp1op1rn te governing body . The C11y nh:tll
;(
1-J
r
B
1'
:me :r:pi m mwu:tm :m:l proV1rl c mfonnauon on al 1 r .~~1,;emcms to the Dl'i'nct , hr.wevcr,
the Ctt:1 docs not guaruntu: th e accu:acy o: co mpleten e~s tl f go, t.T1 11 11cn1 1 e~uhH1 0 :1~
otl1ct tl:t1.u the Cuy'!. own re gu la ho .. s.
P.cga,ding the prov isil'n of s,;wt:r serv,rc, 1he. City 's p:nru t11ng requircmenu; shal l he
fo ll owed by the D1 stn c1 PJ1 C1 its Jscrs . Al l sewer pl a:1!), ~µcc:ifica uon.\ and .nc1hod s of
wo1t v,dhrn tht>. Oistnct ~ha ll be 3Ub ~ru tted to t.h e Cny tn ,.vri tm& an d approved by the
C1:y pr:or to :i.r.y c.ons1ru et1on or IR? m 1he Dinnr.t 's d!".$1L'Tlllle::I. nrca Nr, pr1m 11 sh ;i l hr.
fin::t l i!rcl no sc~nce :;hall be prov·ded lo prop cr.y unul t:o:1s 1J uctio11 1s up:>ro,ed, Hl
wn11 ng by L:1e C ity
Th~ D1s1ric1 sha. I be r.:spousibl r f01 1lw r,1opcr 1rnmte'.1Jncc o:· 11s se·,.ver sysr r m and: hall
r:.w fy any pmbkms or cor:ditions which have be.:n dc1 cr.m11ct.l b~ thc D1 ~L11Ll u~ l.1 1t::
C11y to b:; di;l1 in.cntu l tu the C11 y·s ueatmen l process or S:,'Stem . Should t b : Cuy
dc1cmune th nt nny di,;cho ri:e cn:crs th e sewer system co:ltr.uy to ar p h cn hl .. l;1w ',,
ordi.:m1c:s , s 111a11t',, nik~. r~wil ;1 1u1rrn e r p ::muts. the J ;:;u·ic: agrees 10 pro c:cd i ii onc e
to :ak e ',l.1ha1cvcr la wful ir.eJns 1:1ay be 1:~ct!)a 1y to 1Cl.t1fy nny such ;no blc.:tu 01
comli~icm
Th e C'11y c:halt have the ni:l:t to alloci\t.: s.:.rv1cc u.1dcr l!iJs Co ntrac1 , RllC tll~ C11y m,iy
den y additiona l s:.:rv 1~e for any ut 1lity -n:lated reason , but in no event w ill tllc C :ty
terminate or refuse on) !)::rv1c e wnhollt :ause The Cu y ;~.a ll h.we th: ngh to d1sco nncc1
se r\'1ce to any ari.:a 111u 1("(cd w the n ,st r.cr .11hr.n lnrh 1mne>.11 L!J n :akcs place withNil
pn:,1 wn:ten City ap provr.l.
Within o:ie ycor of :hi5 ug1 cc ment. the Dir.inc: chc ll prov ide :h,· City with an est1rrntr of
the mimbc: of equi vn lr.nt ,r:-v1::c rnp i: nccrlcd :01 tl~e n~:<t fi ve ()) vea.rs under ci.l rr cm
7.onug anC iJlanm:d buihi out i:J the Di stnc1's arc.a~ ~hown ou Ex.hfo 11 A. The O1~ll 1L.t
she.II u m11,1.:e to mon it or w ning chan ges wi t bin 1h; cren to cst.urJJtc its tap reqmrc rn ents
01d ruov1d e the C n y w ilh 11Jticc of tap rcqmrt1n r. fo-1hc :,ext li vt: (5) )C".t11 p~nn,1
v. h1c h 1·me shnll be g1\lc 11 !Cl the L il y on each anm\e:"Sa.ry dat e of th1s Amccm!!nt ma
fo rm satis fa ctory to 1.he Cuy.
Th i.: Cit y mn y uuptJsc :md c:>ll e:t reai.o nahlt: Jee5 to llr, 1mc1 chr.rrer.. wh:ch s1al. be
U"11fo nr as 10 J !I cuts1 dc -C1 ty users fo r th~ services ~rO\•idcd hy lh c City 'Jn Cer thi ~
Conncctcr's Ag.ret:ii'ICJll
inc Cu y shall bill ~ht. D1s1ric1 user:; d1 u:c1\y for nil :l ;Jj il•cahle •~.1 1v :hargcs for scrv 1:cs
rcnct~reo under tlus l\grecmc:n . ShmLld nny U(ll:r n:ll p?1 :he.: Cuy, i.l 1c C 11y sl1Jil Ui ll th:
D1st nc 1 <mll 1hc i>ist 11 r.;t :,ha ll pay 1Le amcum dl:c to C1 t) w1lh 1n fotty-fiv c •,45) dn)S of
!mCh tilling Thc::c c':i.irg:::; :i re :;ubj ect to aC:justru erJI by th e Ci~ iTOru 11m~ IC tune
Whens.id: :tdJ uslment In thc ~c cr~rfC:i are r.u dc, tbc 1..1ty sha ll e,.vt: the D1st n c1 fcin',-
fi ve (t.5) days advance: wnhen noti ce.
'!b e Ciry ma y bill :111C collect ·'Di~t,ct Ch;,.rgcs" unpo ;f"d by tht: Disu:cl!; rs ;m
adclt ti onal Item lo or bd lcd Hnrl llec tcrl hy the C1ry alcn~ w1lb lhc Cit y's Tre;:uroe.cl
:har2c and l.'lhe r fees The "Di:;ni ct harµi.::." 1ci.:c:w.:J l,y lhc Ci ty !>h all ;:,e rc.tnl ll cd by
tl •e Ci·y 10 tht D1st11i;t an11u,11l y, l:ss an amo_nt equal lC 1bc Cttt a nd Disu1 ct ch.i ret:::
wh 1cn rcm.1111 de hnquc:ll . Th e O1stnct dv'I notify 1hr City of;rny ('b :i.ng t"~ m !h t' D1~11 r.:
d 1;irp.r!. 10 he nn pcs ed ano th : rc1tUt1il.J 1cc s:he-dulc: b:fo~e Ma y l '1 of CJ\Ch year .
•
•
•
•
•
•
Subj cc\ to th e <e:-ms of the T Rxp.1ycr ; Btll of Right s (T ABOR ), the tcnn oi th is
Agre eme nt is for o pen ce! of lhre c (3) yea rs fr om th e :i atc of cxecu:ioo ?J ld 11utcm.1t1c.i ll y
1en:wcd for s.x (6) su bsequcm thr ee '3) year pe.,ods unJ css c1tl:cr pa r1 y g.ives a
mirumum of six (6 ) rr.o r.th:; wnttcn nouc c, durin g whic h t1.ne tht: Drn :r ict agrees L~al ell
effluent produced from 1eps w1th m Li~ Di!H ri ct sha ll no t be in v1o lni on of any fcdern l,
srn u: or Ci11 lll ws, ru le s or regula tions. or auy ot he r ap plicab le ~ovcnurn:ntal regl1'at ions
nr 1h r. rir.rmll'< 11ndt'r w h1d1 thr i1 ty o:>era tcs :ts sc:wai;c tr ea tr.tcm syslein. 11le C 1:y
?gTl'.es, rlminc 1h · 1e.m hcr"of. 10 nr .. 11 snid cffl ucn i and lO mc:m:.am a::tequat c fac1..hti cs
for trcatmg th e sarr:.c
The Distric t :,~recs that ;t w1II n:;t mta.n, ,11 ns own X!l("n!;e, all hnrt; nnur owm·d , .. 1rl
~peratcd by the Du:ari-:t , 11 .>cing spr.c 1fically asrcl·d th.t i lh" \1 t y l\rnunr!,: nu
1es 1>oi:i:1bil ity shou '.d any of the D1stnc 1 's hn r; bccoll\C d<,gg!"-<I, rh.m~gt>d , or rrqmrc
mamtcna.nc~ 171c 1::tr.c1 :;hall , if it JccnH nec:ssary, 11011fy its usen, of the Distncl's
pro cedure to r~:i-.cdy :;cn ·ice di.:rup11on .
9 'J lie C ty 1s prov1d mg O!'Jy sewage lr eatr.icn t service and , pur :;unnt !h crc:o; any pcmi:.t :;
1111.,1<l::n 1;il tu tlic u!i: u[ the C1L)'°:,: se w,1g: lines s:la ll Ol, govern ed <mly by lhi ~ ind1 ·11dui\l
(:01 m1c: w1Lh the C1stnct ,mtJ th:.:C it )' du:;~ nut, i,y !lu) C 11t 1t1c:, offer \l t".B lJ1 ,t'l,t !'t;rv 1c.e
cx c1:pt in st.nc: ai.:corc.hi n:.a; wJtb lh c tl:i-lH.'i ltc1eof. ·111 1) Cou tH1 c 1 rices U\')l of1 r-, 1111d slrn ll
not be const ru ed as o!Tc.ring, sewa ge trcaunem :,er.ice to tl:e pu bli c gc::111:rally ~11 to any
ure a outside the h;ru ts oftlle D1sui ct'r. service atca dcscribOO in hlubil A .
10. Tb1s Co ntract m.:v not be a~!:ignc:d., S\1\d or l!;m sforrco by the Dbtricl w11hou1 tl.c: Cuy ·s
wnnc:n consent
11. Sho le an y fedc:-a l .aw , rule , pcrm n or rcg 1Jlauon or shouM a dc:cree or ord er of l1 co un
1Mdcr void or unenfo rcea b:c any p :·o vi sJjll oftlus Co:n.:acl, 11• whclc or m part, the
1e111.m1der s'.1a l! 1zma i11 rn fo ll fo :-cc and effect
l ~ The District sh all enfo rce: th.is Agreement a.nd ca ::h of llS tc:-ms ond cr.ndiunns v•tthm titc
a~~, descnbcd in "f.x.hibn A."' The D1~tnC\ sha ll re fuse ·o serve a user or potcmm. user;
d1~c:n n.1cc1 the service o f any use r pur.;uanl 10 Rppropnate law. er tJke ot her t pr ropnatc
aCIJ OI\ Ill the i.;vC !ll (If'
"\ln·1payt r-·11 nf mch w;1~r of any ch:1rec rnadc: b)' the C1~Y fo1 services,
Anv v1 oln11 on or no nco mp:1ancc by :;'Jc b \l:;cr wit h the ajJF lu,;Jb .r.: !~w s, ru les,
pcrm1·.s ur rc:cu!ot1 ons o f the Cuy, th e Umt cd SIJlC:J gov~r:1mc-11, mciuC.m i; ,:-c
EPl-., 1.hc !J:.a tc of Co lo:t.do, the. Dc pnrtm cnt of Hca hh, or Jlhet bw, ru le, pex1it c;
eµ1,,;1 .. db)c , cgula ti on
Cum1nJ cd breach or 1tu~ A~1 cc111~111 l:y th e D1 ~uic1 rt1 :d/u 1 its us::o sha ll be: cons1dcr.:d
cause for lhe C11 y 10 tcnm n;m: tnis Agrccm::nt. ShoulcJ th e 1)1st11c1 faiJ to 1,nomµU/
rc.:c 11 fy a b1c:ich of any prov1 s 1Jru ider.11 fi cd berc:1n. ,1 ftc1 rn tn.c the· cof, tlic C il) ltlay
tak e such stc s .i nd jo such work ~s II deems neccs~.uy to enforce 1.Lm Agr::c:m cn t.
includmg llt1gati on J..n d spcti f:cally a :i ght ,o mjunction or speci fi c pc1fo11:rn.1 1c c. dl!Bi ns!
the Dmncl or any ol II 1scrs as 1s ncct$sa ry 10 protect the Cu y·s sys1c m and opcrau ons
T l.l e prcvad in n pnrly sball bl cntit lt!d to e.xpc:1 scs and -;osts ofs'.l it, includ ing ett o:-r.cy
fet'.S
14 . Shuul<l .nu,c tha.., on ::. dis uic 1 be con.r1cc:ec\ to D sewe r lm r al di::tn c ·s oo thr sewer 111 1~
who arc m brcuch of th1 :; Agrec 1r.cn1 shall be Joi nll y an C seve r?.!!/ 1.iab lc for n1:y such
br:ach of th.ls Agr:emcul An d u r h ~uch d1s1r1c t shall unmcd1a1 cl v, af:er nut.i ce, ret.:tiry
nny rroble,i or co n.:1 itton dc:rirntntal to the trc:mmcnl p:c1.:cs s aris ing witlun its les,il
boun:l aries. Wh cu n:o rc Um:1 one Uis111c1 is conncc.wl mo :;ewer li ne, und the C 1i }
C.Jscovc1 s c:ny \,1olation of 1hc lcr.n'i of thJ:; connc:tor 'i; lgr::emt'sl: lhi: City slrn ll not he
rc:qu1rcc: 10 pro•,.(! which d1stric1 1s. al fou l! bu l shall m;ike ~·11:1.1.nblc to all suc h affected
C:m ric 1:; nil mform alir,n de velopi:rl or nccum11l11t ed br 1hc C1 1y pcnan.:1ng 10 !111:h bxach
Noth :r.g cc nrr1 111cd hi::rc11. sh nll ;:11cc.udc a c\c.1m for :m.h:1.1111t y or co n:1 ilut1 .J .1 Oy an y
U1!iincl a~arnSl an:Y.hc r District conn~tc<l lu rt '-onumm sc·.vcr li ne . C.:RS-13 21 : 11 5,
.1s am c:nd~d sha ll go vt::rn th e pe rcen tage of llab1lat y of any di~t ric : 011 a. con1.-non s::wc:r
l!nc: in the eve nt :he C ity seeks to irr.posc li nb il11 y ba!:ed 1.pon n~ghgcm:e 01 fa •.?!t.
11"..l:. :on:raet sh,1II 001 h<' us r rl ;i-; ~ leea defense 01 p·o t11 bit1or to the :nnntl::tory
ron~o ll c :\t1on m fec 1lities by cith e, parry .!Smay be: 1C4 ui1 cd by (1c la·.,.s of the St.He of
Cr-lorn d ri of a ll cx.::i 1ing sew er col bct1on sy::tc.T.s nn d fnc .J ilic~ ton glwcrmncntal c olll)'
'~J c,1tc d le ,.ssumc: n.:sp :1:1s ib1lit} fo1 :;ewer :;c:-vicc in the cre a in wi:u ch ·oo lh t hr-C11y nnd
St nt c nre a part under s tat11tory 01 tons;i1u :1o n.d outhn:,1y
C:IT \' Ol' l:NGLEWOOD, COlf.iRADO
--------------' M ayo:
A':T[ST
·------------' Cny Cieri:
•
•
•
•
UUW MA R WAT ER ANlJ SANITA TI ON DIS TRJ CT
SI ATt-Or COLOR,\00 )
CU UNTY°Y~ i"
·1 :1c fo 1r.3:m:g ms trum cm '-''ilS a:kn ow lcdged befo re r1c; thi s J 11.. da y oi [(J (l..,(_,f
~C/.J,,oy __________ I
Wli.nc ss my ha nd an d o:"fi c1n l scn l
1-1.y Ca mmm ,011 exptre;. ')i.,qla,s -
•
•
•
\•,~,!(• L-i•a
l ·
s\ s,vnb,r,(\
s.on,\Jlr\r.
._..,~~ont,111 wwagoo l r,11 1 ~· '.I'
~ W t41)1'11 ~fl t d D a
;.,
Pro•Pt-c,
Wk~rrtMJdDI
w Quin:y Av e
W Waoou l u,il fi r
c-
~·o; ~.<Ji,, e
J '4??g 14,,
,i:~ :9a..,,,.
c:;-
i
"'
w Bcll tv1ew Pt t.,-:
Horlrt"''
w 11111:.,tJc f>1 Wcsl Pmli.
u, ,-
0 I
~
"' ~
WlullsAvr.
"' ri "' ,..
~ 0
~
"' ~
a,
~
WMonm0111 r1
s1 .lnnws
"'• Pre~byte1
Chur c:h
•
•
•
OR DI A CE, 0
SERIE S OF 2013
BY AUTHOIUTY
COi NCI!. BfL L O 45
INTR ODUC ED DY COUNCLL
M EM B ER WOO WARD
AN ORDL\/ANCE Alffl-l ORlZING AN INT ERGOVERNM I, T AL WA STEWATE R
CO "l FC~r OR'S A ,R FFMF.NT RFT\\'F F. C'Ol .lJM RI F. \V~TF.R A1'D SANITAT ION
DISTRICT A.'1D H IE CITY F ENG LEWOOD. CO LORADO
WI IEREA S. th e Cny o f Cn gkwood c,wn s nnd o pi:ra tc s o sewage sys1e m. mc \u cting n sewi'\gc
1rcmmelli plant wluch is j oi mly o wned an d o pcrn1 ed w nh 1he Cit y o f Lllllclo n know n cts 1h c UE
Wastewnter Treatme nt Plan t (W\VTP); and
\VH EK.E.-\S , th e: U E W\ n• pro v1dt.:5 sa nit ary sewer sc1v 1cc to di stn cls utsa lc of th e
Engle,vood corporate bo unda ries through.? stand ard conne ctor 's agreeme nt: and
\V l·IEREAS, the Co lum bine \Va 1c::r and S:11111 :1t 1on Dis1n ct desires to u11 li ze 1hc LIE \\i\\.-r P fo r
treat me nt o f the Di st ri c t's scwngc . und
WHEREAS , 1he 'olumb mc Water and Sani1 at1C1n D1s1rict has nppro x1 ma1 ely 336 tap :-: and
IVl-rEREAS , the UE W\Vl'P ,s situ ated ph ys icall y as to be ab le to receive and treat th e sewa ge
from a des ignated area served by th e Co lumbi ne Wat er and Saruta t,o n Di st ri ct and gat he red by the
n1s1ric1's sr1 nil i\f°Y ~rwr1gc i.y i.1t•m : 1nd
\VHERE AS , Co lumbine Wa ter and Snn it oti on Di stri ct wi ll c ontinu e to o wn th e Ime s nnd will be
rc !:ipun:-.ib lc Cvr 1.:a(Ji tal in1p rovc mc111 s rind 111ai11tc11a 11c c in it s !)y~tcm; a nJ
WHl::K.r.AS , th e tnglcwood Wa ter an d Sewer Uoa rd rc \1 1ewcd and r.:comm t ndc <I :1 pp rova\ of
the Co lumb in e W:Hcr and Sa n..i ta11 on D1 stri c1 Wa st c,v:i tcr Connec tor 's Agrccmcn1 al the Ju ly 9 ,
2013 me etin g:
N W, THEREFORE, OE IT ORDAIN ED BY TH E CIT Y COUN CIL or THE CITY F
ENG LEWOOD . COLORAD O, AS FOL LOWS·
Sc .11 0Qj_. The Lntcrgovcm mcnta l Agreement bctw-.en th e Ctty of En glc ,vo od and Co lumb ine
\1/atc r and Sa nit ati on Distri ct enti tl ed "Wastewa ter Connc:c tor1 s Agreem ent For L>1 stncts" 1s
hereb y appr ov ed : a copy is attached heret o as Attac hmen t I
Sr r 1in11 2. Th e M;1yor 1s ;nuh on zed 10 ex.cc 111 c and C it y Cle rk r <lttei.t nncl 1;~J th e
l.nt ~rgovc mmen t.::1 1 .:Was tewa ter Connec tor's Agreement'', for ~nd on beh alf o f the Englcwoocl
Cit y Co uncil.
9 b i,
lntrod uct!d , read in full , and p:i ss ed n fi rs t read mg on th e ]rd d:1 y nf Scptem hr r, OU
Pu b11s hec1 by ·111le ac. a Hi l l fn r an U nhn:rn cc in 1he C11 y's orti c ial newspa per on the 6th ay of
Scp lcmhcr , 20 13
Pu bl ished as a l3 il l frx an Ordmnncc 0 11 th e Citv's oflil:iu l "d,s it e b ci:;i 1utin go11 the 4th day of
Scp1cm b cr, 20 I 3 fo r 1h i11 y (JO) cla y,.
Re ad by titl e nnd passed o n fin al ren din g on 1hc 16th day of Sept embe r, 20 13.
Publi sh.;d b)' tit le 111 the C u y's o:'fi cial n~w spaper n~ Ordin ance Ne ._, Scn cs of ~Ol3 . on
1he Wth day o f Sept ember ~O IJ .
Publi c.hcd by t it le on 1he C ity 's of 1c 1:1 I ,1.ch ,11e hcg1·111mg on !h t: 18th day of
Septe!llbt'r , :!0 13 tor thirt y {111) cb y1,,
Hand:, P. f'l'Tl n , Mo ye r
Lo ucris hia A . f:!1 1s1 C ity Cle rk
I, I .n ur.n o;;h1 :1 A F Ii i'-, C11 y r.J crk of th e City o f Engi c:wood, Co lorado, here by ce nify llutt th e
:i hov e and forcgo mg is il true cop y of 1he 0 1d111 :?.nce pass ed on ftn nl readin ~ anU pub h:,Ji .:d by
lll le as Ordi:ia nce No. , Series of 20 1 J .
Lo ucrish1:1 A. Ell is
•
•
•
•
•
•
WASTEWATER
CONNECTOR'S AUREcMEN"l
Fo, Dis tri cts
4/19/20 12
Revi sion
Sewer Cont met Nn . ___ _
THJS AGREEMENT , made and c111c 1cd into this ____ clay o'
_________ , 20_ 10 be effec ti ve as of ___ -:--:---~ 20_; by and
be tween the CITY OF ENGLl::WUOIJ , t.:U LOKADU , a murucipa l corpora1t0 n, hcr ern aft cr
referr ed lo a.s "City," acti ng by and thro ugh its du ly elec ted , qualified and authorized Ma yo r and
Ci ty C le rk, and th e COLUMB INE VAL LEY WATER AND SA.NITA TION DI STRlCT, a qua si-
muni cip al corrora ti on and su hdiv isin n nflhc State off.nlnrncl o, hc:rc in.:ft <:r call crl "0 1i:.1ri c 1,1
•
acting by and through its :i uth ori.zcd Representat ive.
WTTNT.:SSETl I
l'/HER.EAS. the Cit y owns and operat es a sewage sys te m, mclu ding a sewage trca1m c n1 pl ant
which is joi nt ly 0"01ed and ope ra ted with th e City of Li nleton, so situated physically as to be
ab le to rec eive and treat the sewag e from a des ignated area served by the Dis tnct and gathered by
th e Di stnc t's sanitary~sewage sys tem : and
WHEREAS, it is th e desire of the Di stnct to util ize th e fac iUti cs owned by the City for the
treatm en t o f sewa ge and th e City is wtll in g to serve the District fo r trc.a·.m cm of .se wa ge under
l;Crt.aiu com.li liuns ;
NO W, THEREF ORE , IJ\ CONS IDERATION of the promises and for other good and
va luable co nsi deration hereinafter set forth , it is mut ua ll y ai:ree<i by the panics as foll ows:
2.
Th e Cit y hereby agree;: unde r th e: co nd il io ns hereiJufl~r set forth, to trea• t.he sewage
ori gin:u iog from the Dis tf!c t 'r, r,:mitary sewe r r,yste m with in th e area served by th e
Di stri ct as appro"cd by the City and as in di ca te d in th ~ dc sc rip tioo 1.•tt acbcd hereto,
incorpora ted he rein and marked as "Ex.hibit A."
The Di stri ct spcc 1fically agrees to preven t sewage fr om any area oth er th an that
described herein. from being di sc harged intu the Di stri ct's sanitary sewage sy,,-ie ru
onncc1cti ro 1hc Ci ty ', tnm k li ne :md to preven1 conn ections to 1hr systc..•m from o:-in
any area ot her than tho se desc rib ed herein .
IJ1 tile o pc iat1 ou of t.h c DisLric t ·s sauhary st:wer sys tc..-m, I.be Disuic 1 agrees thm ul l
app li ca ble Co de provi sions ,.nd ru les and re gu la tions of the C ity. in cluding amendments
the reto during th e tern, of the C<l ntract , shall be the minin1um s~1Ddard.s for the Di stri ct 's
system. Th e Dis tri ct further agree s to abide by all app lica bl e state an d federal laws,
rul es . regu lations . or permi ts , including those of the En viro nmenta l Protection Agency
(th e EPA ) as they becom e effec tive or implemented or upon notice fr om tb c City .• be
Distri cc sha.11 inform rill u.<;ers1 co ntract ors and subcontrnctors o:' such sL'.lndards, rule !; and
,cgulati ons up on inqu iry fr om su ch pe1 sous, ~1.u<l s ball not furni sh any informa tion
inc,,nsisten t therewith lo thi s regard, it sha ll be the respons ib il ity of the District to
obta UJ the app hca blc rcquucm cn ts from th e appropri ate govcnung body . The C it y shall
l
ancmpt w mamt.ai.n wad pro vide i.nfum ui11on on nil req uire ment s to the Di stri ct; how ev er,
the C ity docs not guarantee the ncc urnc y or comp lcttnes!. of govcmmcn1 regul ati ons
other than the C it> 1s own rebru latioos
'{ Regarding lhc provi sion of sewer servi:e, th e C 1t y'!> pc11 nitt.in !; 1cq u.ia t."!Ut.1H s ha ll be
fo ll owcJ by the D istri ct and iLS users. All sewer pl ans, specifi cat ions e.nd m ethods of
work within the Distri ct shnll be s ubmit1cd to th e Ci ty in writing and a pproved by th e
Cit y p rior to any construction or ta p in th e Distri ct's dcs ign:-it ec1 :i re., No pc m,11 r.ha ll be
fina l a orl no servi c e sha ll he p rovid ed to propert y un :1 1 constru ction is approved, lll
wri ting by the C it y.
4 . The Di strict shall be rcspon:;ible for the prv pc.-r ma mten 1ncc of its sewer sys tem and sh3 l1
recti fy aoy pro blems or cond it ions w h.1 ch have hccn dc1c n111n ed by the Di stnct or the
Ctty rn he deLrimemal to th e C i:y's treatment process or syste m. Sh o uld Lh c C ity
determin e that a.ny dischurgc c:nlc1~ lh c: sc" er sy stc111 co nlra:-y to appl ica bl e la ws,
01di11ances , sta 1u les, rules. rcg ulatto11S or permi ts, 1.hc Distric t agree:; Lo pro c eed :lt o nce
to tnkc what e ve r la wfu l mean s ma y he ncccss:u-y to rectify :my s uc h p mblem or
cond1 t1 on
5. The C i1.y sh.:L!I h a ve tl1 e ri g.l u to allocat e scrY1cc under this Contra c t1 nnd the C it y may
deny additi onal service fo r any utilit y rdatcd rcasrm, but in no e vent will lhc Cit }'
ttmu.nnt e or refus e an y st:rvice without C'a use . The C11y sha ll ha\o e t h e nght tn di sconnect
service tn :rn y are:t ;mn exed to th e D1 stnct when such an nexati on takes place with o:Jt
p ri or written City a ppro va l.
Wi thin one ycn r o f th is agreement, th e Di stri ct shall provi d e the r.it y w it h an es t imat e of
the n um be r of q uivalent serv ice ta ps needed fo r th e r.cx t fhic (~1 ye:.,,; un de r c urrent
1..nnmg ;md f'l:n ncd bui ld ou t in th e Di stri ct 's area as shown on Ex.1ul ,it A. Tht' Di st.net
shal l contmue 10 monitor w rung c hanges wi 11U11 its a.rca tu estimate it s tap re']uir~mcnts
an d provide the City with nou c c o f tap rcq un c.-mcnt fo r 1r.r 1,ext five (5) year period
whi c b Lime sha U be given 10 th e City on ea ch anniv ersa ry d~ti.: oi thi s Agreement in n
fo nn sati sfactory to the ity
6 . Th e C it y ma v impose w 1<l coll cct n.: . .:is unablc fees, tolls and ch,u gcs , whic h shall be
w1fform as 1c, a ll outs id~-Ci 1y user:; for the services prov id ed by lhc Ci ty undt.-r thi s
Connector's .'\gr ccn 1en t.
The C 11 y shall bi ll the Oistri c t user.. direc tl y fo r all app li cable C!l y c harges fur services
rc:t:dered under tl u s Ai!fct..1nt:11 t. Sh u ul d n.uy user nm pay the Ci ty, the City shall bill the
Distr ic1 and 1he !Jistri ct st. 1 pay tl:e nmo \!Jlt due to Cit)' w ith.i n fo rt y-five (45) days o f
such bilhng . 'l1 1cs e clLarge s a.re s ubj ec t to adj us tmel'I by lhc Ci ty from 11me to tim e
Wnen such ad justment 10 these chnr 1cs Arc mac\c , thr C1 1y sha ll give th e Distn, l fo n y-
fivc (4 ~) days advance wri uen notice.
TIJ c Cny auy bt ll i\Jl d co l\cct ·1Di s tri ct Chnrge!i '' llll pos cd by the D istricts as an
ndditlo ru>l ito m to be bill!ld and coll ec 1ed by toe City along with the C1ry's Trcmmc'll t
clu r11e and o ther fo es . Th e "Di stri e r Cha rges" rcc c1verl hy th e Ciry shall be remit ted by
•
•
th e C ity to t.bc Distnct annuall y: less an aJ.llOW1l equa: to lhe City an d Distri ct charges •
which remain dd inqut .. -rtl. TI 1e D is trict shaO notif-y the Ci ty of an y cbnn ges in th e Di strict
cl.Ja.igcs to be im pos ed ,io d th:. reJl1.l ttnncc sch edu le befor e Mo y Ir. o f each year
•
•
•
7. Subject 10 th e terms of the Taxpaye r 's Bi ll oi Righ ts (l".'\.B O R), the term of this
Agreement is for o. period of three (3) yen.rs fr o m 1..be d:ne of execut ion and uuto mnticnlly
renewed for six (6) sub sequent thr ee (3) year peri ods unless either party g1V cs a
mrnimum of six (6) mo nths wrincn noti ce. during which time the Distri ct agrec5 that oil
cffiucnt p roduced from top:; within the District shnll not be in vio lnt i oc of nny fc d crnl,
;,t.l tc o r C ity lows, ru les or rcgu\ntions, o r au y oth er np p lico blc govcnuncnto.1 regulat ions
o r the permit!i under which the C it y operates its scwnge treaunent system. The City
agrees, during th e tcnn hereo f, to treat said efnucnt nnd 1.0 maintnio c.dc<1untc foc i Ii ti cs
fo r tr emin g the r.nme .
8. The Di stric t t1gr ccs thnt it will muintnin, ul its O\\TI expense. ull li ncs no w owned nnd
opcrotcd by the D istri ct, it being spcci fi cnlly ngrccd thu t the C ity ussumcs no
rcsp011sibility snould any of tl1c Dis trict's line:; become c logged, damaged. or requ ire
nuintcnancc. The Dis tri ct shall, ifit de ems necessary. noti fy its users of the District 's
procedure to rcUlcdy service disr1.1p tioo .
9. The City is providing onl y sewa ge tr ea tm ent servi ce and, pursuant Lh crcto : an y pcnnits
incid ental to th e 1.1se of the City·~ scwngc li nes sh1'.ll be govcmed onl y by thi s ind ivid ual
Coiiu-a I with the i:..~titri c t and the City does no t, by thi s Contract, offer treatmem serv ice
e~cept m st,ic t aci.:01da!lcc wi tl 1 tl1c tc1 i ns he.cof. TI1is Co11uact does ueot uffc1. and sha ll
no1 be: co11s trucct as offc1 ing, sewage trca 1me111 .s ervice 10 llit!. pu bl i: geucia ll y o r to an y
an::a omsidc the li.w.i 1s of tLe Dj str ic t's se1Y!cc area dtscriUcd W Ex.h.ibit A .
10 . Tiu ::. Cou lr.ict may uot ht:: u.s~igi1t::ll. :,u lll o :-t1w1sferrt::<.l by tl1e Di ~u ic1 wiL1 1uul We C it y':,
written COllSC.ill,
1 t . Shou ltl any fockral luw. rule, pcmiit ur rcgu lalion ur shuu!U u <l ccr~c or on.l cr uf a Clllffl
render vo id or unenforceab le any prov ision of this Co ntr::i ct , ii, who le or in pan. the
remainder shall rema in in fu ll for ce and effect.
12. T he Distri ct shal l enforce this Agreement ;md ea ch of its tenns and conditions within th e
nrea desc ribed l!l "'Exhibit A."" The Distri ct shal l refu se to serve a user or potenual user;
d isconnect the service of an y user pursuant to appropnalc law: or take other ap propriate
ac u r n m the event o ::
I 3.
a . Nonpaymen t a l suc h user o f an y charge ma de by t11 e C11 y !or sav1ccs :
b . Any vio lation or noncompliance by such user wi tb the tcnns of thi s Agreement ;
c . An y vio lati on or noncom plian ce oy such user with the ap?liea blc law s , rul es.
pc nnits or regu lations of th e ity. th e United Sta tes govcmrncnl , in clud ing the
EPA , the State of Colorad o. the Depar.rueut of Health , or other law , rule, penuit or
app licabl e regulation .
Co ntinu ed breac h of tlus Agr eeme nt by the Di strict and lor its users shall be considered
ca use for the C11y to terminate this Agreement. Shou ld the District fail 10 pro mpt ly
rectify a breach of nny prov isions ident ified her ein, after notice thereof, the City may
take such steps and do such work as it dee ms necessary to enforce ttu s Agreement.
incl uding lit iga 11 oa 2nd speci fica lly a right 10 injw,cti on or specifi c pcrfonnance against
the Di strict or any of its users as is necessary to protect lhe C it •'s sy stem and operations .
1
TI1 c prevail ing party snail be ent itled to ex penses an d cos t" of suit, wcluding attorney
fees.
14 . f tv ,uld more than one d i~tri c1 be conn ected to a sewer li.ne , all d1 suicts on th e sewer line
who are in breach o fthis Agreement shall be Jointly anC. severally ha ble fo r ;my suc h
breach o f thi s Agrcemen: and each suc h distri ct sha ll unmcdiatcly, after not ice , rectify
an y prob lem or conrlition detri men 1al to th e trc amtenl process ari sing \.Vithin it s lrgal
bo undan<'s Whe n more than nne d1s1ri c1 :" connected to a sewer line, and th e C.ny
d1scnv e~ a ny violation o f the tenns of th is connector's agrc.-cmt..-nt : th e Cit y sh11l no t be
rcqui rc<I tn prove which distri ct is at fa ult but shall make av•ilablc tu ;1!1 such affected
distri cts all info rmati on developed or accu mu lu te<l by We Ci ty pci tou ll1lg to such t,, eac ll .
N01hing conta ined hc1t::jn shall pn.:dciJ c a churn for U1denuuty or cotuributi n by any
Di stri ct against G110Ll1 c1 D:stric 1 connected 10 a co rrm1on sewer line. C RS~ 1 3·2 J. J I 1 .5.
as wuc nJed slu11l govern the p:rccmagc o f liability of any di strict on e common sewer
li11 e in th e event the City seeks 10 imp sc hub ili 1y bnscd upon negligence or fault .
15 Ibis Contract sh:tl l not be used as a le g3 l defense or p:ohibit ion 10 th e manda1 ory
co nso lidntion of faci li1 ies by cithN pan y as may be requ ired by the l3'-''S of t he Stme nf
Colorado of all t:Os tlng sewer coll e~tion systems and l ?.c1ht 1cs 10 ;\ gnvemm cnt a l c n11 1y
c:eated to assum,. res ponsib1li ry for sewer service in 1h e nre.1 in wh1ct-. hoth lhe City and
Swt c arc :l par1 11 11der ~1:m11nry or co n!-illtlltlonal authority.
CITY OF EN GLE WOOD. CO LORADO
/\TrEST:
, l'lly Clerk
•
•
•
•
COLUMB lNE VALLEY WATER AND SAJ\~TATIOK DISTIU CT
l:12~
LEE SC Hil,LER , Pres ident
Sl'ATE OF CO LORADO )
).JJ, )ss.
COUNT Y OF '(/11t~ )
111e foregoing ins1rumcnt was ,eknowlcdgcd befor e me tru s ·±!:.._ dn y of } , . -, .
20 .li, by __________ . J"'~__,__
Witness my hand and o ffi cial sea l.
My Co mm iss ion expires · ~~/4?QI~
•
•
•
•
•
O RDl>JAN ENO
SER I ES OF 20 IJ
BY A UTHORITY
our-: IL B ILL NO . •16
CNT RODU C ED BY COUNCIL
MEMB ER WOOD WARD
AN ORDIN ,\NCE AP PROV ING SU Pl'L E -1E 'T NO. ~2 TO T H E V A LL EY SANITA TION
DISTR ICT CONNl:CTO!rS A G il ECM EN T WIT ! I Tl I[ C ITY OF EN GLE WOOD T O INCL UDE
A DD IT ION L L A ND WIT! UN THE D I ST RI CT BOUND A R.LES.
WI-IERE .L ... \-.:Il e:~. ·,J'l!ta tio n D1st1i c t has submi ncd :t rcquc:s1 for mcl us wn ml o Valley
Saru1a t1011 i • ,•·, .: •~1 : .. .i1 .cl wuh the pro posed us e of the pro pc n y .i s ;rn o ffi ce rm d wureh ouse:
:wet
W II CR EAS, SJ ppk mcnt No 2~ 1s lor nppro xim:i tc ly 3 .53 ac re:, w luch is prcscn ll y zo ned I 2
( lt:11c111l u1111 uc1(:1JI/L 1J u~11,a l) au J SJ H.l 1.011111 g w ill re ma in th e s am e , nn d
WHEIU:..A.S, !-:i 1d armcx ,,11 011 ol tlus add1 :1011 al par cel o t land wi ll no t 111crca:-ic th~ ta p a\loca 11 011
to the Vallt.:y Sw11:ni on Di s1n c t, nn d
\V HE K.EA '> 11 '" necr,;;s:,ry fo r sa id D1 s 1nc1 to amend 11 -. cnn tr:ic t w it h rhe f'n y o f Fnglewo oci 10
in clude :h.i s :itld11 101K1I b nd wi thi n the Di i;trict. :ind
WHEREA S. the Englewood W,ner and cwcr BozrJ rc:vic,,c<l a11 Ll 1c...u nu11 cm.lc J a 1,prv va l o r
1hc Val ley S:u rn auon !'lu pplcmcnt :--J o. 22 to Co 1mcc 1or 's Ag.rc c111c111 at the ir Jul y 9, 20 13 mcct 1.11g ;
NOW, TI-I ERFFnRE, BE IT RD AJNED rw T l-IF rrrv ('()I IN ·n. OF T H F. C'IT Y OF
ENG EWOO D, "O LORADO. TH 1\T
Sectio n I. Th e Agrl·cmc111 bt:l\\'ccn th t City o f E11 gk Y-u L1J dud Vall ey S.11111 c1 t1 u11 O b tii ct
entitled "Sup plement No 22 10 Co nnec tor's A g:rc cmcn t ' 1s here by approve d
A co py o f s:i 1d Agreement 1s at t ,chcd hcrelo :i s Exl11 b11 A
Section, Th r Ma}1or ;md it) C~.:rk ~n· hN eby :i.111 hc-r i1.c<l to -.1 gn ;rn d a 11 e 1;1, rcs pcc11vcl y. th e
~id Agree ment .M :md on behalf 01 th~ C1t }' Co uncil :rn d the City o f Eu~lewood.
in troduced , read in lull , and pass ed on firs t rcad11 1g 0 11 th e 3rd day of Sept ember, 2 I)
Publi shed by Title as a Bill for an Ordinanc e 11 1 the Cit y's ofli c,a l newsp aper on the 6th day o f
Septe mber, 20 I,
9 b iii
Pub l:shed as a 8 111 fo r an Ord inance on 1he C i1y's o ffici al wd ,si1 c b eginnin g on 1hc ~th day o f •
Sc-p 1em bcr , 20 1) fu rthi 1t y()0J Jays .
Rea d by ti1lc a nd passed o n fin al reading on ·, 16th day of September, 2013 .
Pu bli shed by title in th e Cit y'!-. offi c ial ne·, u,opc 1~ Orchn:u,ce No._. Scncs of 2013, on
the 20th day o l Scp1c 111bcr 2(1 1,
Pub li shed by tit le Clll the City's official \\·r l ,sitc bet an1 ng u11 th e I th day of
Scp1cmbe1, 20 13 for thiny (JO ) da ys.
Kand i· P. Penn, Mayor
Loucn shi u A Elli s, Ci1 y Clerk
11 Loucris hin A. Elli s, Cit y Clerk o l rhe C1t)' nt l:.nglcwnnd ,' .. lorado . he re by cen ify tha: the:
:1bovc :md torecom g ,,. n l mc co py of t he Ordinance pa ss ed 01. final rCJ <iln g aml publb,ll cJ by
title as n rd ina nce No _. Senes oi 20 13.
L,,uc rishia A. Elli s •
•
•
•
•
SU PPL EMENT NO. _2-'--2 ___ 1'0 CO NNECTOR 'S AGREEMENT
TH IS AGREEME NT, mad e and entered int o by a ncl berw cc n th e C ITY OF
ENGLEWOOD , acting by an through it s d uly auth orized Mayo r and City Clerk ,
hereinafter call ed th e "Cit)'," and VALLEY SA~ITA TIO N DI STRI CT , Arapahoe and
Douglas Co un ties. Co lorado, herei nafte r ca.li ed the "District ,"
WlTN ESSETI I:
WHEREA S, on th e 18th da y of April . l!3 19 55 th e Ci ty and the Di stri ct
e1:tered into an Agreem ent in whi ch th e ci ty agrtcd to trea t sewa ge ongina ting from I.he
Distric t' sanitary sewer syst em wi th in the area serve d by the Distri ct , wl1ich Agree ment
was renewed by Connec tor· s Agcccment dated ...!.{l.llJ.Ulr. 12 20< 1989
WII FR I' AS, sai rl rn nectnr 's Agn·ement provi des that the disrn c, may no t en large :ts
servi ce area with ou: the wri ucn con sent of the C11 y;
NOW , THEREFORE , in co nsiderati on of 1h e mu 1uaJ covcnani s and unde:1aki ngs herein
sc i forth , th e part ies agree a.s rn ll ows :
I. Th e Cit y hereb y cons en1 s 10 rh e inclu sion o f cert ai n ndd i1ion al ar ea located in
Arapahoe County, Co lorado, own ed by _!_,;e,e__b_clru ______ an d more
full y dcsc rih ecl 011 Ex hi hit A att ached hereto and in co rpornled herein h)' re ference, i nto
Valley San ita tion Distri ct. ·n,e Ci ty agre es that sa id addi tional ru-ea may e served with
tt,e sewer faci li tie s of the distric t , and tha t th e Cit y will trea l th e sewage disc harged inl o
t~e Ci1y 's trunk li ne fr om sa 1d add itio ml area , all in ac co rdance wi th 1hc Connector 's
Agreement da ted April 1 8 ,,2ll 19 55 and Am en1l ed
,Tnn uor· 12 , '.W<~. Accor din gly, E xhibit
A referred 10 in Paragraph I of 1h e Co nnecm r 's Agree men 1 da 1e d A~ti l J a J 95 5
3.{k _ and Ame nde d _J_an u a r y l L 1!!8 9 ___ , rs here )' am ,ndetl to
in clude ~uch >Htditi onal ::i rea .
2. Ea ch an d eve ry oth c-r p:ovi sion o f the said Co nn ec tor 's Agr ecmcni da 1cd
_A_pril__J.lL 1955 an d A mended .l onu_o.ry _ _l2 , 198 ~ . , sh a ll rema in un changed .
I N WITNESS WHEREOF, th e ,1art1cs have sc i U1c ir hand s and sea ls 1his
_____ day of ________ , 20 __ .
• MLA TL Fami ly Limi t e d Li o bility Li mit e d Partn e rs hip
E • ...
I n
I
T
A
ATTEST.
CITY C L E RK
(S EAL)
ATTEST .
Su pple111m1 forC'om•rtnl"'I: Agrd~
CITY OF li ~G LEWOOD
BY
MAYOR
VALLEY SAN ITATIO N DI S TRI C T,
ARAPAHOE C OUNTY, C OLO RADO
By: 12rt1a/.A ,t?/4 ,J
I
•
•
•
•
n, r:10 .. •1 P-"'>' II •enl,)' ORDF:Rf.D ~-
•parde fto llia11e•1.tnd10 Q) GRANTED/ cop,o,1,1.,copyof~Onlu•uyp,o
APPROVED • ..,..,. • ., ,. 111;, ....,. _..., 10 .,,. •
_, Ille d.., of 11,J, ,nt.,.. John L \\t1..._,
'---~--'-----....1..--------·---.-i Dla111C1Caur1J111lge
DISTRI CT COURT, ARAPAHOE COUNTY,
STATE OF COLORADO
Cow1 Addn:ss : Arnp,,hoc (. n ~rtty Ju;•jce ~nrc:r
732S South l'otomoc Slnlll
CentcnnillL CO 80 I l2
Phone Number : 303-64Hi3S 5
IN RE THE MA ITER Cit TI-!1' 'ALLEY
SANITATION DISTRJCT, ARAPAHOE ,
COLORADO
Timoth y J . Flynn, Esq .
Collins Cockrel & Cole
390 Union Blvd ., Su i~ 4-0,1
Denver, Colorado 80 22 8-1 5S6
Tel ephone : (303) 91'~-J S5 I
Facsimile : (303 ) 9~ii-!"i~•
F-Ma il: tflynn @eccfirm . n
Auv. R.e #: 10-18'
DATE OF 0ACER ON A TT ACHMCNT
C..Se No.: SSCV! 1425
Div.: Cum .:
ORDER OF INCLUSION OF REAL PROPF.Rn'
"MLA TL Pro 1c "
THIS MA ITER C A ',, E BEFOR.'E THE COURT upon th e Motion for Inclusi on
of Real Property r by th ','·Jlc y Sanitation Di strict. H.:iving consiJered the Motion
nnd attachmen~ ,:..ad lberew1lh, the Court finds good cause for grdJlling said Mot ion ;
IT IS TfilREFORE ORJJERED AND DECREED:
That pursuant to § 32-1-40 ) (I )(c)(I), C.R.S., as amend ed, the real property legall y
described bel ow, together with all improv ements thereon ("Property"} is hereby included
imo the bowidaries of the VaUc y Sanitation District, Arapahoe County, Colorado, to wit :
LEGAL DESCRJYTION
A TRACT OF LAND BEfNG 11{A T PART OF TIIE
NORTIIWEST ¼ OF THE NORTHEAST¼ OF SECTION
8, TOWN SHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH
P.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATTIIE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST ¼ OF
THE NORTI-IEAST '/4 OF SECTION 8; THENCE S 88'50"
EA DISTANCE Of 625.80 FEET TO A POINTON DIE
•
(OOJ l961 ? DOCX/)
u recording plellst. n:rurn 111·
Tiructhy J. Flynn
Co ll ins, Cockrc : &. Col ,:, PC
)90 Uni on Boulevard , Su itt 400
l)en •,er , Co lorado 80""-28• I ~56
WESTERLY LINE OF A TRACT DESCRIBED 0-1 BOOK
1126 AT PN }E 249; THENCE S 43 DEGREES 08'15" W
ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRA C.T
DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1126AT PAGE249 A Dl ',TANCE
OF 71.78 FEET ; TiffiNCE S 18 DEGREES 16')0" W
ALC>"I G 11ffi WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRA CI'
DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1126 AT PAGE 249 A DISTANCE
OF 258 .02 FEET; THENCE N 88 DEGREES so· WA
DISTANCE OF 497 .57 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
NORlH-SOUTH CENI'ERLINE OF SAID SECTIO N 8;
TIIENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID NORnJ-SOUTI!
CENTERLINE 01' SAID SECTION 8 A DISTANCE OF
300 FEET TO TI IE POINT OF BEOINNINO : EXCEP T
TIIE WEST 50 FEET THEREOF, AS DESCRIBED IN
E'.)O K 1007 AT PAGE 316 , COUNTY OF ARAPAHO E,
STATE OF COLORADO .
Al so b to vh , by stJ-e o1 and number ns 4300 S. F~dcrnl
BouJr.vard . Sher idan, Co lora do 80 l I 0.
DO NE this_ day of ___ , 20 12.
BY THE C01 'RT:
Distri cl Co un Judge
f 00219<W)OCX~ 2
•
•
•
•
I ..::.·=e:./1 -'-1:"-
·.!..:.r.; I
. l I:
;, I::
~i I'/ i
!--1:· r ·--
-=-=\ ~;?
•
M LA T L S UBDI V ISI ON F ILING N O . 1
FINAL P LAT
LOCATE:> IU 1 HE llOA'0'4EA!iT OlJ,t,"'\i ER or-SECTION 8. r o ·llll'.sHIP 5 S0Lr'h •.
RANGE GE WF~r OF l HE ~OCT" ... PRl:¥.'.;JPAl. :.:.ERIO.,a..t,.
c,rv 0,:. S'-iERIDMJ. COUUTY o :::-A f'lAFANQ E
SlATE QF COLORA DO
I i·•~= .,.,,,'!...., fl...c,.; ,
ye~;~~ =r:--~~~~~~:.:,-~------------------------. v :=:-..!:..-..1!~ l -~-,~
•
~-----
___ /
~~
I;:_.-:,.....,..
'_ -~,__ Lu.:.:~ --------__ r,~-;,.:.~..:: -----------,~;,' .
_,,,_, '--·-
,' ( ~ ~,
~ "' .,
I
I
I
r~·-c:.·.:-_
.:::-, -... -... I
I
/J.r/ · r.-tr ·g r' ,',;,· i/
!. (
,...,~_,;..-------/
•-~.::ll: ---------I/
_ ;;,7",:;-•~ 1'-----·-/
-=<>m..
I 1!
z
:-;1.:..--=.""
/ R
-~;:1-_
t =-=--"::.....~:.: .... --.
C,
~ •·,
.:1~· 5 ~
U!<-
~'5 · .. •.
"'
.:J 51
4200
'250
ht1 p .//g is .co a, apuliuc .cu.us/ar cgi so111p11 1/ _acs_3 daO f3 96-d52c -4dd c-9 eea-893 f2 dRh ad6 J png 4/2 n/70 I 7
•
•
•
ORDIN/\N('F NO
ER f ES OF 20 I 3
BY AUTMORJT Y
rr,: INrrL R fLL NO 4 7
IN"! ROUU C ED 13Y CO UI\CI L
M EM lJE R W OODWARD
•\N OR Dl1'ANCE ,\l'PROVING rm, "ENG LEWOOD UTIL rrI ES 01:PARTM EN T 20 11
W!\T ER CONSER VAT!ON PL AN ."
\Vl rFR FA!-!. St :t le :mrl fcd ern l man d:ucc; requi re 1hc C:i1y to rt vi,!W w :1yc; tn rc<lu cc Wat f:r
demands in 11 s servic t: "trea , and
\VHERE/\S, the Lolorn<lo Water 01hi..:rv,11i on Bo:1 rd req uir es a w:11cr co nscrva11o n pl:1n ,
approve d by th e Sta.tt as a conJ it1 o n of elig1b1hty for a water e ffi c1c:1cy gran t to 1111p\c111e111 the:
C11 y·s Pinn ; and
\VT l'E REA S, the: Ctt ) ha s ev.ilu atcd the nn µacts o f wot er c 11:.crva ti on on th e wa ter s upp ly;
an d
\Vl{EREAS , C\cry seven }cars Co lorado ,cq uircs an updat ing o r th e Ci ty's \\la ter
Conservat ion Pkrn an d Englewood Cit y Council approved a pnor \V::it er C'C1 nscr\':1t1on Plan 0 11
March 11 , i997, and
\\IHEK.EAS, the pro posed \\'atcr Cl\11S crvat ion Plan outli nes Englcwcod's cx 1stm g water
system . its hi story , the co1ru11um t) it serves, the public info mu11i on progi am . the mc1enng
program , k ::k repa ir as we ll as m.1 111t cna nce and addi ti ona l proposed water conserva tio n
mea sures; and
WHE REAS , after 1he pl :mnm g process, which inclurh:d public comment, 1hc Eng lewood
\\lat er a nd Sewe r Board recomm ended Co unci l ap p ro, al at th c:ir Jul y 9. 2013 mee1 1ng, and
Wl lE RC,f\S, the pl.m, o:icc app ro"~d b) the Ci ty Co unc il, wi ll be:: sub111 1u c<l 10 the.: ffi cc o f
\Vat cr Co 11 scrvat 1on. ·1 he Wate r ns crvn tion Board mu.I the D cp,1 11111ent of Na tur:1 1 Reso urc!!s
fo r thei r approv al: and
WH EREAS , Sta te app rova l of the pro po secl pb11 wi ll enab le Englewoo d to apply for futu re
~ta lc luun:,, g_lJllb a11J WJ lt:1/w .:S t (\\,llt:1 rt:vv lv 111g fumh..
NOW. TH ER.EFORE, BE IT IU),\1'-JED BY l'l{E CITY COUN CIL OF T HE CITY or
FN(;J_F W()OI), c m OR A n n, TH A T ·
St.:~tiu n t . 1111: Cit y Cu u111.:il uf tlu: City uf Engle;\.\ 1.1W l1 crcby apprnvc s the " ity o r E11gl c"ood
Uu l111 es Dcpanm cnl 20 13 \.\l ate r Co nst..va1 1on Pl an··. nuac hcd hereto as Exhib it A .
9 b IV
ln lrod uccd , read in full. ,1, .: j,uss cd "" lirs1 reacl mg 01111 1c 1rd cln y of Sep1t-mher :m 1
1'11~l1 ~hcd hv I 11le a:-. d •• ii for :11 . rd1nan Lc :n th e C!ty's omcia\ new spa pe r on 1:1c <i"" da \'
o f Scptem be.: '· , 1
Pu l,lb iu.:J u~ _ b 1'. 1 •· ._,1 Ou.li11 a11cc u11 th e ity ·s C1f1ic1a \ we bsit e begin ning o n lhc 4t h dn y
o f Se pt embe r, ''1 fc,r 1hi,1 y (30) c!n s
1'11 t-J 1c;h cc1 hy 11tlc 1111h c Cit y ·. o ffi c ia l newsp aper as Ord in.111 .::r No .
!(11 3 , o n the 20t h doy o f Se ptember 2013
Pu lb hcll lJ ; title 0 11 tht: C11 y·~ o f(ic it-1 ! \,eb!l.i ti.: beg111ni11g on th e 18 th dny l,)f
Scp <cm lm, 20 1 fo r thin y cJ0) cla ys .
RanJ y r . Pen n. Mayor
•\ l'I F S I ·
Louc,ishi:i /\. Elli :;, City Cler ·
I , Lou,nshi a A . Elhs. City Clerk o f ch e (.',cy nl Fn glewo0<I , < olornrlo , hereby cen cfy th at th e
:i bvvc :i nd loreg rn g ,c.;, :'\ tru e copy 11i 1he Ord111 .'.l nce pas sed on fi na l reading and pu Ii shed by
11tlc :l '-t lrd 1n:m :c No . . Series o f 20 13
Lou cri sh ia A Ell 11-
., •
•
•
•
•
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
ttilities Depa •t'fne nt
2013
WATl'.:H CONSEH\'A l'ION PLAN
•
•
•
TABLE OF CONTENTS
E xecutive Summary ..... .. . .. . ......
C hapt er 1 -l nt r od llct ion
C hapter 2 -Prollle Ex1s tr 11 g Water Systerr \
Ch c.11d Cleris tic s uf E11 glewuod 's v,.r:.;,er 8 u~-rl y Sys tem
Sys tem L1m1 ta t10ns ......... .
Wrt ler Cosls and Pr,c1 ng
Poli c ies and Pl anning ln 1t 1at1vo;i ,\H, .. ,trng W3 tcr Use
,irr enl Wate r Conservati on Ac11 :ll.bs .
Chapte r 3 -Water Use and De mand rare casL ...
1...,-.0 by Customer Ca tegory
T10s and Waler Use SL1mmary
· · ·~and For eca st
C ha p1 a, 4 -Wat er Co ns ervation Goa l s ..
Goal Develop me nl Process ..
Water Conserva ti on Goals ..
Chapter 5 -Co nservation M ea:;,u res and P rogram s.
Wate r Conservation Measuri~s a nd Prog ram~
Screenin g Cn tena
Screen;ng of Conservatton Measu re s and Prog re.ms
Chapter 6 -Eva l uati on and Sele cti on ...
Cos ts and Wa ter Sa vin gs of Conservat 1ori Opti ons
Co mpa riso n of Benefits ano Costs
Eva lu ation Criteria ..
Sele cted Conserva ti on Measu res and PrO!)r ams
Chapter 7 -Integrate Re sollrce s and Modi fy Fore cast s ....
Implementation Schedu le
Modlfled Demand Fo recast ..
Be nefits of Water Conservation ..
Cha pter 8 -Pl an of Impl eme nt a ti on ;tnrt Moni torin g
Public Participation ...
Mon;toring and Evaluation .
Plan Upda tes and Rev1s1o ns.
Plan Ad op ti on and App roval
Refe re nces ..
Clear W~1 e, So lutio nc; 111,
C ity ol Eng1cw ooc1
201 J Wa ler C·:rnserva11on Plan
ES -1
2
~
10
1 1
14
14
18
18
1R
2 1
22
22
22
25
25
25
25
29
29
32
]2
33
~7
3/
39
39
40
40
40
40
4 1
•IJ
I
I I
U3 T OF TA B LES
Ta ule E5 -I 1N ,H01 Cu11:,~1vr111,J11 Godl~
1 able ES-2 1n,p ementc1 11on Pla n fo r Englewo.,.,J 5 ·I/m e r Ccnser.<.1t1nn µ ,in
Ta ble 2 1 • c ,1yof ·,gl ew od H1s tor1ca 1 Popu lat ion
Ta hle ? 2 • An nual W al er De hve red & Assoc,atec Rainfall
Table 2 .3 • r 11 m Source Water Owned by lhe C 11y ol Enqlewooc
Tahle 2 ~ • C it y or Eng lewood 20 12 Me tered Ra1es lns1cla City
I able 2 5 C ,1y of Eog lowood 20 1, Mo1o rod Ratos Ou tside C,l y
I able 2 mgle-Uso Wat r ys te m C nnert,on Cha rge s
r ao ie t, -Ml1ll 1-f-am 11y 1-tes1u n11a1 Wa ter Sys lem Co nn ec11on cnarges
Ta ble 2 8 · Co mme rcia l Mi xed Use Wa ler Connec11on Charges
I able 3 I · C 11y o f Englewood W al er Use
r able 12 C 11y o f Engl ewood Melered r ap by Cus to mer Categ ory
Table 13-C 11y o f Eng lewood No n-Mete r Taps by Cusl OITif:!r CM~JOry
I able J 4 • C it y,,, t:ng lewooo Total Taps by Cus1omer Ca1ego rv
TalJ le 3. C it y u f Eny ldwuuLI Wctl t:1 1 Us e pe r Taµ (rn ett:lt!tl u 1:,tu 11 tti "i)
Table 36-C ity of Englewo od Per Ca r ita W ater Use
Table 4 1 • Eng le11,,<0od Wa )r Con se rv ation Goals
Ta bl e 5 1 • Univ ersi::tl Lisi of Cons ervrt ti nn Mea~u,es ::t nd P1ogrr+ms
Ta ble 61 • Co sVS a vmgs Ana lysrs of Conser,at,on Measu res and Pr OQ ram
T,,ble fi 2 Cusl·Be nefit Ra nlo.1 119
I ahlP. R ~. Combi ned W ate r Sav in gs of Selected Conserva tion Measu re s and
Programs
Table 6 4 WatfH Consa rva 1011 Goa ls arid on1pan so n
I abl e 7 I · C ity ol Engl wood Wr1 te r Conserv ati on Plrt n lmplcmo n1 a11on
<;c h edu le
Ta bl e 8 I · T rac~mg M Atn>:. for Mon11 onng Wnte r Con!=.ervftt1 t1n Measwes
C lea r Wate r S0 1111 1011s
Ci ty of nqlf'\'N 'lO d
•
F$ 'I
~
8
9
12
12
11
u
11
18
1
q
19
20
20
21
?fi • 3 1
1~
1'\
·1~
>5
42
•
•
•
•
LIST OF FIGURES
Figu re 2 1 . Englewood Wal er Ser,ice Area
Figure 2.2 -Englewood Wal er D1s1n bu l 1o n Sy sl em
Flyu ,c 2.3 • Pe,ce ntage u f Taps µer Cusl ome, Catey wy ...
rigu re 2 4 • Pe rce ntage of Water Use pe r Cat egory
Figure 2 5 . Ann ual Wa l er De livered
Figu re 2 6 · EMAP De l a 1ls
. Clear Willer So lt1!1ons Inc
Ci ty of Engl w ood
20 13 Wat er Co n scrvauo o1 P lan
iii
3
4
7
7
8
I
I.
E EC U IV -S U MMARY
l he C11 y of Englewood Colora 10 1 ·C,I y ,r ·• ngIewood / is ,, suburb an
rnetropohta r1 romrnll nt ty lor ;;i lP<1 c;;oull -,,t Oen vp r .n Arn p::t hoe County Dunn
It1e pas l five years lhe CHY o f Englewoocl 's po pul at,o • ha~ l 1overed drou111I
0 ,000
Englewood oas develooed a Water Con servation Plan ,n a cordancP with lhP
Water c o se rvat,o n Ac t of l 0 0 4 and o meet the prov Is ans of Colorado Re vi sed
S ta tu te se ct,or 37-60-12 6 A s µ;;rt of CRS 37-60 -126 . a Stale-app roved Pl an will
cuah fy Englewood for funding f om the Colorad o Wa ter Conserva tion Bo.1rd
fCWC B ) and the Col rad o W ater Re sources an c Power Development /\Jthonty
fu, Wdl t:1 -:,up ply a r,d del rve ry pr o1an ,;
111 20 \ \ En ylewoo,J's water CJs lo n1ers us ed appro,i mately 5,606 acre-feel The
C, y , according lo lh c Planni ng Dcpar\mcnt's p ro Icc lion . ,snot esp ected lo
inc rease its water demand through ne w growt Wa te r savings fro th1 c; w::ttPr
r.o nserva \Ion rla nr ing eff on ,s es tImatP.<1 lo save lhP. fi .72 1 acre-feet over the
pl ann ing pP.not1 of 20 13 lo 2022
•
For some of the selected wa ter conserva tion measures and progra ms . esuma :ed
sav;ngs over the p lanrn no I,enod Is ca lcu la\ed by compound ,n g the esuma\ed
annual wa ter savings per lhe to tal number of an nual part IcIpa 11 1s Tl ,e sav11Iy ,; •
from thi s pla nn ing ettort wi ll rnake a con ::.1 uerabl e conlnbu uon :.oward the water
su ppl ies n eeded lo serve lh u 2022 demand
I hi s rP.pnr l r1o cu r1en ts Eng lewooo ·s water sys tem . pas· and 'Ltu re water u se an d
\h e w ater con servat ion p lan rn 11g process used 111 acco rda11 e w,111 CW CB's Wa ter
Con serva tion Plan gu,del,nes and p l,c ,e s
Water Conservat ion Goals
En gle woud 11as con s1dereo wa ter con serva1 1on 1n 11s pla n111119 fo r ma ny ye ars and
h as deve loped a nurrber of e.isurcs to promote eff ,c,en\ water us e The C,t y
ha s Hl s t1tu 1ed the fo ll owing wate r ,·on..::r-r vrl t 1n m Pr\~1 1n~~ ~mt pm!)r;:un i;
• Public lnfo rmaI1 on
• M e ter Replal.ement
E11 ql1•wood Me te , As sis t;;nce Pruy1a11 1 I EM /,P) T hi, orogra,r
h,1t1·· water custo mers mstall me te rs 1n hom es by al1oca 11 ng a
:-1~~,1 , m o : their wat er bil l payment :01J.ards ·t--e cc st of a meter
Lea l-Detfw ·,o
• P h1rrhin g C nci ~
• Nonrn1ah lP ;a rn Water RP u,e
C laltf W :u e r S 0 1t 11 ,o n'-11 r
f:11y IJ ! E"rt Ql, .. w uud
10 13 W:110, C:onis a rv ;111 o n P J;rn •
•
•
•
T l1e Cit y Is Jncena In of the reductior1 in water use at tribu ta ble to the existin g water
co nse rva tion effons . Howeve r, ove r the ten -year planning period (2013 to 2022),
tr ack in g effo rt s wi ll be implem ent ed lo quan tify waler savi ng s and costs lo ope rate this
Wa ter Conse rvat ion Plan
Wate r saving s goa ls were establ ished for :his Wa ter Conservatio n Plan by completing
the fo llowing steps ·
Esta~l1sh ,ng an ,n itial water savings goal es timate
Selectin g wat,i r co servatio n meas ure s o r prog rams to meet tho se goal s
• Compa ring !ht expected wale r savin gs to the o rigin al go a ls
In order to select wa ter con servation me asures a~d p rog rams to mee t the wa ter savings
goa ls, a uni ve rsal lrs l o' measures and prog ra ms we re sub1ect lo an initial sc reenInq ,
cost-be nefi t :inalysis and fina l screen ng This process pared lhe uni ve rsa l lis t down lo
the final selection of measures /progra ms that Englewood will impleme nt Th screening
criteria used con sisted of the follow in g .
Staff Time
Financial implication s
3 Po litica l ram ifica ti ons
The goal for th is Wa ler C • nserv alion Phn is l o red uce the overall water use by ten
percent or 6,72 1 AF ove r a ten -yea r planning perio d . Thi s sa vi ngs vi ill come from wa ter
use ca tegories U1a l we re ,d en lified through the planning process for pol'c!n t1al waler
savi ngs
, Single-Fam ily
• M11 ll i-F,m 11 ly
, Comme rcia l
, In dustria l
• M unicipal
• No n-Me tered Cus tomers -Meler Rep lacement and EMAP
• Unc1 ccou11t ed-Fu 1 Loss e s
rt1e C1ty°s wa te r conservat ion goals are shown In Table ES-1 .
Cle ar W ato r Solu11011s In c
C tty ol Cngl4:!W ~Od
20 1 J Wa ter Con se rv ati on Pla n
r.:1b lo ES -1 W ato, C o n sor v;.1t io11 Goals
--
Total Projoct.c
Wate r Use Ad justed Re duct ion Go als for
W ater Use Catego ries : (2013 t o 20221 Plannln Horiz on
(IIFI 1%} (~Fl
5,1 n gl e -r am i ly 19,642 65% 1,2 /1
M lJ III Fanu lv I 1,602 110% 1.2 /6
.... omm~t c,~I 10,387 \5% 571
lndus.!n ti t d 778 70% 334
i\1ut 1\.11M I 22~ (. :.·\, I
fl.on M e tcr~d (u .,1u111 er.,
Met er Rep t~1cement and
LMPI' l M.LU/ 1J 4% /,b U
l,n ~ccoun ted f o r LO'>\t?.,
(w rre nt ly 9%1 ~.836 SO% 6,18
l o tal Wat e r Prod u cti o n 70,677 --
TOt dl D~l lld!ld RL'd Ut.l 10 11 6,72 1 -To t al Pe r ce n t R!!duct ,o n IC))(,
Impleme ntation Pl a n
A ll o f th e pro posed wa te r conserva tion mea su res a nd pro grams chose n Ni ll req uire staff
~n d fi nanc,a l resou rces fo r 1m plemen tat1on This will requi r e some stra tegy in
1mp lement 1n g th e most beneficia l measures firs t For 1llus:rative purposes, a three-year
sc hedule has been proposed and should be ,n ter preted lhat Year 1 ,s the C1Iy· lirst
priorit y o f rroIP.r.t s fn ll nwed hy Ye;ir land then YP.Rr J an n w,II nn1 hP. w1 lhIn lhree yems
exar.tly The, propnserl 1mrle,111 en t;,tion o f th is Wal er Conse rvat ,nr Pla r will o,:cur as thf'
ner.e ssa ry resources bP.corne a va ila ble,
Enq le wood ,s committ ed to 1111 pl emen11ng t he selected wat er conservat ion pr ograms and
wi ll budget money and pursue CW C13 wa te r-eff iciency grant money 10 accompl sh th,s
goa l Ta ble E S-2 shows the 1rn plementa t1on schcc ul c o' the selected
mcosures/p rogrnms
Mo ni to rin g of t,e Plan will be completed o n an annJal basis a nd a fo rmal Jpdate ,s
r c~ir ed by CWC B w 1th1n seve n yea rs Pu oh c 'eecback Is an integral pan of thi s Pan
;;inr! r.nm rn Pr"'tc:. w PrP c.n lt r1 IP <i rl'lrl u,r rpn rntP.r1 tn tn lt1 P. f1nr1 1 Pt ;:ir
('li;;,u W ,,tP• CinhJ1 ,n11,;, Jnr
t::1 t y .,f f11yl t.•v.-u1Jct
•
•
•
•
•
•
Ta ble ES ,2 -lm p l em on t al ion Plan for En glewood's W.i ter Conserv ation Plan
M•Hur•/Proaram
YEU 1 11ST PRIORITY}
[11 ltwood Meter "3 ,11to nc , Proa re m llMAJl
(",,n,,,1 f1 l l,.,1,1'• .,IC>,,I 1>1 11111 '"' ,,,r ,i;,•N.ili"
lf~lotor r Slortdord1 Proprom ~~, n~\
l:ducotio '1 al Pr ogi roms
Rc,u,lo torr Stoftdord P,ooro m1
YEAR 3 l!RD PRIORITY}
Utility Mo lf'l trnon« ProproM1
f d Ut0 U0ft0 I Pr 09romJ
..... _,0_01_,_°'_d_,,,_<~_l .. _•_P,_og_,o_=_, _____ ,~·JT\.:.,,,,,,ll .!'. h1<lu . ,.,· w~I~• h1d 11:.
.... •'°~"'-"'-'"'~"-••-•-••_d_P,~,g-"-",-•.I ____ ¼_,_.,._, ,_.or •1 tt· 11 t,, l·1r,q;r w:1 1,•r ~H"'f\
C le ;u V-..111;.1 S o lu!l o·,-. lnc-
C.1 t y v i Cny !cw c,v <I
lmpl1m e ntatlon Cons ide rat ions
St.i ll Time &Fund1n1
':!','' '(' •urlll I r ... , ','l"ll•!'ll
M lh•r ol\
~1.1tl I ,..,.,
• 1•1('1·11 r & \IBII I Hnl'
701 3 Wa io, Con"ie r 11a 11 on P lan
C H AP-I ER 1 IN TROD I CT ION
I 11 • Cl!) , f l::11 1 wood Colo r ado 1 ·cI1y o r ·F rgl .,o od I s a subur~a n
rn t:t ro oil al' c.orn nun1t~ ocated sout of Denvo, 1 ti..rapaho P Cu.r, y
r'l g iewooci'c; c;1nru ng rp trr1 cPd to go:c In tw 11'.1<1 -• 80llc::. prn":1 P .tore; ·1
rt 1P1r wa'{ to l..al 1k1 r 1.:1 c;fnr,peo 111 Colnrarl o 10 pr1 n tis stream~ On of t ... 1esP
o rM per.to r~ w~s a mAn frorn Geo rgia named Wr ll,an Gree r Rdss er: H an t
o tn er mrners fou nd golc rn tne Soulh P lat te Rrver and es 1ablrsl1ed a PlaLer c ..,rnp
near 111 con flue nce u f Lrlile Dry ~ree• d 11U the Suuth Platte Rr,er 111 a n area t'ia:
would i,verrtu a lly become Englewood Toda ys Englewood ,s a c rstr~ct reflectron
v f rt s colorful hrs tory T~ere rs str ll a foc us on tra nspo rt atron ., ducatro n . and the
arts and Englewood boasts rno re 1obs a nd busrnessco per square mrle tha n any
ot er crty ,n th e Rocky Mountorn re gion l::ngrewood rs toca tea west o f tM Oen ser
l ech C en ter . n orth o f Lr t tleton and sou th o f De nver wl1 •ch g 1 ✓e s rt I1s strong
employment base
J\lh1 le l:.ng iev,ood r1 crorr1,ng to th P ~1:-inrung DP.p;1rt m Ant's oro1e c11on . 1s n
P.<[lf!r.ter1 to r"l r.rease rts wa ter demano throug l1 new growth a nu nber o f rnu lt ·
1am rly huusrr ry µr ui ect s ilrn l.r tm ry µl;11111eu Ire Cr tv o f En9 lewood wa s
rrcurpu ra teu 111 1903 w,t h a la nd area o f 4,4 ·o acre s Fr lt y-e ,ght percent of the
a d rs residential , 35 percen t ,n dustrral/commercra l anc1 seven percc rrt public
The City ,s landlocked w•th no apprec,,ible amou t of land tha t con be on n,;x
Durrng th e pa st f•ve years the Crty of Englewood 's pop rla tron ha . hovered
~'0lll1d 30 000
nglewood has developed I rs Wa ter r:onsPr vatr nr Pl:,n rn a.:. rnnanrP wrth the
W rltf:!r C nn~erJ::it 1on Ac ! of 1004 ;m d ro meet the prov1s1O0 of Colorad o Re vise<!
tatut e sectron 3 7-60-126 As part of C R S 37-60-126 . a Slate -apuro ved Pla n writ
oua tr ly Englewood fo r lundrr1g frurn ti re Cutu•ddCJ Wa te r Cons erva tron Bo ard
1 C WCB ) ~, rd trre C olurau u Wa ter Resources and Pow er Development l\ut11o rrt v
fur wate r ,upply an aelrve ry proI ecls
E nylcwooll 1~ co·111 rn11od to op t1mizmg 11s JJ :ll er s11 µpl 10 s dnd sys 1ei n thrOuf;h
µr:-1ct1c:1I wot or co nserva tion prn ct1 ces Englewood h;··.; al so been able to provide
...vri tor lo ne1ghbonng CO P111lUnllleS 1n nBeo w,u , adcled efftCI Cll y th e C ll/ nm ,
have more wa ter to al loca te for ler15 f' (c;ri!fl nl rr1w vmtrr) rn 1fc;1<tf' 1t1P. ~it y ThP
pl~nnmg hcm7on for tt11c; pl;m s tP.n yP Rr<.. from 701 J In 70?2
t...lt• If W ,ttl I 5 o ll,1 o-,~ LI.
C11v ,,1 F"q 10 • ..-no
•
•
•
•
•
•
CHAPTER 2 -PROFILE EXISTING WATER SYSTEM
Character istic s of Engl ewood 's Water Supply System
Em;_ulauon and Se rvice Area
The 20 10 Census data for Engl ewood shows a popu lati o n of 30,255 peop e ·1 he
following !able shows t:ng lewood 's popu lation fo r the last ,·x yea rs
Tab lu 2 1 -City of Englewood Hi storica l Population
Vear Poouf ltlnr,
1001 31 ,19 1
/008 32,191
/~ ~ 31 i9 1
1010 30,7 Sr>
lGl l 10,2 C,~
]01] 10 ,1~;
A11e rage 31 ,213
'",1,wr,, l f"l glt v.nnrl \ c, •r prf"h"Mh'" 11l,111rnr ~L)•.}1 •'•\
,,nn n,,cumf"fl t llnc:d••r.11 1£,1,.llt•wuo,1 fn,i,"._[,t•tl
r.,,,.11, •. ,,,., . .,,,,r,10
Pno r lo 1952, the Ci ty of Englewood wa s prov ided wa le · service by the Den ver
Water Board In response to new waler meter requ irements and proposed
higher ra te s 1or wa ter service . th e cI l 1zens o1 Englewood voted In September
1948 lo issue bonas to devel op an Independ ent wateI system to serve the City
Attorrwy Marc us Shivers and Charles Allen . lhe mayor d uring this period , were
the guid ing fo rces I~ the de velopment of Englewood's wa ter sys tem . T heir task
was not on ly to build a wate r treatm en t and pump fac1li ly to dis tr ibute th e trea terl
wal er hu l also lo acquire an adea uat e raw wale r supply
Havi ng secu red waler righ ts. !h e nece ssary fa c1li I1es to deli ve r raw wa ler for
treatment and d,s tri b11l ion lo lt.~ City we re bui lt. An intake facili ty lo ou mp raw
water was constru cted al Union Ave nue along the side of !h e Sou th Plalle River
Th e inta ke faci li ty co s Isled 01 a dI vers Ion da m , intake ga te a small reservoir a11d
a pu Inp sta tic ~ A pipeline wa s then constructed fro m II,e facility to t1 1e new
treatment pla1 loca ted at S Wind ermert> Stree t and W Layto ~ Avenue The:
Ireat,1ent plan t r.ad a ca pa city c,f 25 01111,o,, ~all on s ocr day (MGD ) and bcr,an
o peration In Apri l 1952 Two 3-MG reservcirs were also constru cted du nnt' the
f1f t1e~ to supplement I e d1s,c1bul1on system suppiy
Clear Wat er Solut11j 11., l rH.. 20 1 J Water CoPservat,un P l.:i n
C1 1y ol Enff~'-"CO <.I
•'' •I ~•7!lrt,·' l 1:.1, 11 lr'yl''·,,,,.., o,i,,,• .. 1,\'P'•''l·.111,;»l,')'lu ~,.;f,.., t,111,~,.-tv\.j\PI
, ... t"' lern;t""l dc nrt 1-;,u1f' Jff· 11f•r11i.. 1nJ io i;.n t,;ir,ce treatm r l "'I f follO"\ 11•.: f1o urec;
;l 1llW n4le¼uull ~ ~r1 v1, t' Pt.-',1 .i r d 1J1~t r1 t,ut1 01 1 sys lem
t
j
f.t• ,II W ,lll'I St>'\ll! I~ Ir
r +If ,I E 11u1;..,,oo J
F iyuru 2 l E 11yl~w ood W a t~r Se rv1t.e Are ~
.:.,...
::7
}I f·,\ I 0. ./. -H P
, ..
·..,_
.......__
1-
J
r
•
•
•
•
•
•
Figure 2.2 -Englewood Wat9r Distribu ti on Sy,tom
Eng le wood Wat er O ve r 8 In ches 111 Diam e te r
-~lear Wa ter Solu t,o ns. In c
City o f Englewood
I\
I~,,,. •
2013 Wal er Conservatio n Pl an
f o meet uture deman he •aw water supply system was su pplementP.C wt several
m aIor sup ply and storage proIe cts to increase the yiel d of Englewood 's w;;ter resour es
fhe C11; constructed M Lellan Re servoir on Dad Cla rk Gulch lowted near Count; Lin
R ad and S San ta Fe Th e 6 000 a ~re foo t reservoir was on tru ct ed to orovi de
sto rage to augment the raw water supoly In dry ye ars Othe r proI ects 111 luded thP
p,p, g o' 1he City Di tch and M cBroom D,lch , the •e hab1htat1on o' tre Bo reas Pass Ditc h
and upgrad es to the ,uon Avenue pumping lac1ht1 e and assnr1a te<' prp1n g Alt;n tt1P
~ 1y mnst n,r.t f>0 ilireP. r.eep well~ 10 augment the raw water supply
Th City wa s playued w1 1t 1 wate, µressure pr oblems llur1r1y l11e s1)t1t:!:. dlld ')t:.'\le11t1es os
E nqlewood's µupula t1on qrew Tl 1ert: wa~ 11n,u tri c1ent waler p1e:;surt= a t several po111 1s :n
the sys tem and the quantitie s of a va ilable wa ter were less th an adequ ate Seve r;a l
studies were perfo rmed during this period w,th 1he intent of sol-,ng the oressure and
:;uppl y proolem Several ,mprovcmcnts were cons ru ctcd ,nclud 1ng th e 500.000 gallon
Zuni tank . a 6 MG re servoir , a d several pur1p station s ,n the di stnbu t,on sys tem In
1977 . th e C it y, still plagued wi th water pr essure proble ms , ad opt ed a mull -pressure
1one sys te m The wa te r distnbut,on system was seg me,lled into ree separa te and
independent pr essure zones Seve ral la rge tran smiss ion ma ins were ins ta ll er; to dehver
rt water si mply In th e separa te ,onP.c;; Al ong with lhe lnrge tra nsm1c:;s 1nn mn,ns . rt
200 .000 g allon elevated tank was cons 1ruc1ed on Sherma n Street south o' Bellevie w
Tl11s zo n ed sys te rn proved to fin all y resolve the pres sure supply uroblem
•
The qu alit y of th e South Platte River at th e Urno n Avenue D 1vers1or pu mp station was
excellent when the Ci ty syste m was in itiate d ,n 1952 The origina l pla nt was a softeni ng •
pla nt That wa s aband oned when the City wen t to coag ulat1 on /filtrat1on Ove r the last
few decades , several conditions on th e South Pl att e River upstrea m o f Urnon /\venue
led lo th e degradation o f the water The trea tm ent pla nt was there fore pa rt ia lly
upg raded In 1977 . and th en more completely so in 1960 The upgrade increased the
treatment caraci ty to 34 M GD , add ed new chemica l coagulati on a nd a mult1m ed 1;a
fi llrntl on s ystem By \he mid -rn nP.li P.s , the in crnaslld rn,t rien ts ann al g;ae ,n the Sout h
Pla tt e Ri ver once aga in tnggere o improvements To meet the challenges . the tre aln'ent
pla111 wets cu 11ver1a.: frurn o Uirt:H..l rH trat1 ur1 prm.:es~ tu a cu11 veritiun al trea l111e111 oru~ss
U sing pla te settl ers . new noccul at1011 and se dimentat ion faci lities wer incorp ora ted 111 lu
the ex isting pla .,t site In addition . the ex ,st,ng filter s were re trofitted wit h g r;anu lar
acti va ted carbon to improve 1a ste and od or T he new plan t adc1 l1on was onlin e 111 2000
w ,t h o treatment copoc,ty o f 26 MGD The tr ea tmen t ca pacity wos lowered d ue to
reduc&'1 wa ter d emand T he reou ced wat e r demand was d ue to requ,red metering of
res1 dentIa l pro pe rty at th e time th e property ch a nged ha nd s .
Wa rer De mand
B a sed on th •~ City's b1 ll i,g syste m ave rage wat er use fa • :he las·. '1v e yea rs 15
, Total : 171 Gallons Pe, Cap,td P~, Day 1GPC D l syst e m-wIae
• Residen tia l · 69 G PCD fur s,ny le-a11tJ r11ult1 -farn 1Iy r,omes
t.l \.'<1 I Vl.itc, Sull l llUI\~ ll l l
C 11y of Engle ,o d •
•
•
•
In 1987 . the Englewood Ci ty Cou nc il pa ss ed :a n ord in a nce requiring the i,1st;i llation o f
water meters (and swi tc hing to con sumption-based rate ) at properties receIvIng flat
rates . upon tr ansfer of ownership An ave ra~e of 220 meters have been 1nsta!led
annua lly for the past 25 years . and an as soc iated 30 percent redu ction In water use has
taken plac e By the end of 20 1, E nglewood wa s serv ing 0 ,670 tap s 1nclLd1ng 8,596
varia ble rate custom ers (metered taps ) ard 2.0 74 fixe d rate cu s tomers (no n-metered
ta ps) The tap ca tegori es include tt1 e following .
• S1ngle-Fa 1n,ly
• Multi-Family
Inc udes Mob il e Home P arks
Commerc ial
Includes Schoo ls
• lndustr ,al
• Munic ipl'll
• Non -Mete1ed Tap s
Each of the cus tom er cat egories are shown ,n Figure 2 .3 be lo w with the co1 nc1 d1ng
perc en tag e of tot al tapi (m ete red and non-metered )
The water use dist ri butio n fo r the sam e c ustomer ca tegorie s oaks a litt le d iff eren t than
the tap di str ibutio n and i,; sh own bel ow In Figure 2.4 While Single -Fam il y w ater users
co ns ist of 80 percent of the ta ps , they onl y contribu te 43 percent of the water use
Conv erse ly, wh ile Indu strial an d Commercial taps only cons isl nf ten perc Ant nf lhP.
taps . th ey contri bute 3 1 percent of the water use This Is helpful to con sider when
selec ting conserv ation measu res to ta rget c ert ain categone:;
Cle ar W n1er So lut ions . Inc
Ci ty of Eng lcw c,'>d
20 13 Wale r Co nscrvilt 1on Ptil n
2011 Total Taps
F,yme 2 4 -Pe r cen t ag e of Water Use pe r C al ~gor y
It 11 \VcH(·r "oh,111.,11._ tru
r,t I rn tr•'w 11r1<J
2011 Water Use
( metered customers)
•
•
•
•
•
•
The follow,ng table sh ow s En glewood 's ove rall p,oduct,on for each o f th e past ten years
Tilble 2.2 • A1 111ual Water De livered (Overall P ro <.Ju clu ... n) & A ssociated P recl p .
YEAR Annuel Water Annual Water O.i1 .ery PreclpitaUon
Dlllwry flnchu)
IIIGl fAF)
2002 7.92 0 65 8 ,9fi3 5 96
200 3 2 647 ?9 8 , 12 J 13 92
200• 2 27 3 17 6 arn 18 47
2005 2 559 70 7 E55 13 ~4
2006 , 589 76 7 !:ltlij 11 19
200 7 :l UI OY l b ,.'!>b 11., JJ
2006 2 224 -l b 6,t!U 11 ,,
2009 I 8!>1 (1 !>,tJHJ 2H
1010 i ,04 U 8~ 6.,oJ 99
201 1 1 86322 5,7 18 13 "
Table 2.2 and Figure 2.5 shows 'S tead} d..;chne n nverall w al er consum ption
Figure 2.5 • Annua l Water Deliver ed (Overall Pro duction)
Annual Water De li very (Millions of Gallons)
Clo;11 W..it cr So lu t1 011s 111 (
City of E11gll Hood
20 1 3 Wat , Con ~crv~1t 1on P la11
S011f1:1u:, nJ WRtPr Supnly
Tl e ~vate r ~Jppl PS ownco by th ~ Ci ty are shown 1n Table 2 .3 .:1 10 11 ~1 w,:1 th-ir fi rm t' Ir
I able 2 J -firm Sourc e Water Owned by th e C1 t v o t EnA lew ood
Water Source
N rvr1 d,1 Ditch U4
Nev,1dJ U,t ch UlY
?iattt: Canyo n Ol 1 ch 1114
Pi •h-•1:.IJ uq_t 0 1t d1 ,:6
Nevadil Di t ch tM
tJ cvJda Ditch n1 9
Mc.Br oom Dit ch tt l
Ran ch Cree ~
Bon•.::i" l1 1t r h
Brown Ditch t;9
u u11a ud u ,t ch ub
Cit y Di1ch :fl
Au ro 1,1 Dt-l1ver) O bi K,fll o n
To t al
Decretd Amo unts • acr,-
foot/yr
Con.sump tive ~Ingle -Use
Use
6.07!
Hll
114
~11
,l(q B~L
l l ~ l~ij
11t1~
9 ]8
I /\
,I I 81
ij~
I i b i
ll'l ~
l ,Z% 16,01!
Water Stored•
Nunh R-.·~ )41j
WWRer. • I
M r l Pll;m .' C(X
ro ,111 UBI
'A • ,, Il l ,•,r1 y. f H ~ ,1.11 ti 4 l!, •• I •n ,I',• 1
Dunng the la te fort ie s to n 11d-fift1es E11g lewoull d t..~lHI \J r11 u1 Wdl , 1 qtH~ l1 0111 ',,1e
a itches, w"ht ch w e re then tra nsferred 1n wat er c.rn ,rt to E1 q1 w o d 's Sou th f1 1att R1vr:1
in take located I Union Avenue 111 add111011 E11gl owo0d t:icq w rC'd nqh l s o n lwo L11 tctr cs
located on Bear C reek and ngnts on !he City D11 11 Tt1e c 1\y D1\tl' righ ts a re l h
1·u 111ber one priority in the South Pla lle R iver Brl s111 Th ri yhl tu 1w tr d11 111uun ta1 11
d iver sion proiect5 we r a l so acq uired by t~1e ty 1n tho f lt1<'c r h f1rr.l w::t s Borcos
Ditc h loc ated rin the con t,nenl al c 1v 1de be twPor1 Cor i o and rec~enridg . wh, t, d ,vens
v.,i 1er from I e Bl ue R iver a alnag e basin to I c So11 tt1 P1r~ re~ 1r tt1e S u \h P atte
R iver 8a sm The e r.ond trans 1nn unt 111 d ,v pr ~1rv1 r gh1 -.. wt .1c 1h,• City a cri1m d vv rP
the R ,v .ch Crcek/M e::id o w Crook "<I tc, wlwl1 wore llw ·1 qht to wll ~I s to re ond d1vu rt
F rac..e r R 1vPr Aas 1n wa tPr thrn1 10t f")11n 1,1 Pr "M oll I ·1 l'll\Pt sys ern
C lea, w a 1er 501t1 11uni., l•H
C it y o f En9lownC\d
LU 1 J Wate r tonsentat 1c n Plan
•
•
•
•
•
•
Sy stem Limitat ions
Alonq with areas o f h 1qh wate r us~. system !1 m 1ta t1ons can prov1dt ,S 1\j~t in to how and
where to set water co ns erva tion goals D1scuss1ons t ~r will include boll • cur ent and
potential system li m 1tat 1ons Idea lly , con servatio n can help m1tigat a port1Jn of tho
l11n 1ta tion s and im prove the reliability and effici ency of t e sys.te-:n
Srarew"ie Waler Supply lr,ifl r1t1 ve
In 200 3. the Colo rad o Gen eral Assembly au tt,o•i zed CVvC 3 ' n plornoN ho Sto tow11:n
Water Supply ln1ti at1ve (SWS I) as a re sult of grow11g press, wa1p , sup phPs 111
Colo r~rl o ~nd t~e 200 2 droug ~I The stucy id en t1f1ed cu m 1 ,. fu l l''e wa te r dP.1m 111 ds
avai lable wa ter supplies . and ex istin g an d planned water s Jro1e c1:i "' 1qh t nrn 1 r
ri ve r bas ins in the State . SWSI was recently updated to S' l 010 , wl1 c h IH OJO t
demands to 2050 and 1n~iudes pass iv e wa ter con serva11 on savings Pas ~1ve sa v,n ys
,ncludes such thin gs as fu ture deve lo pment usin g more eff 1c1 en 1 wa! r fi xtures 111 their
bui ldin g process
Tt 1e City of Eng lewood 1s loca ted 1n 1he Metro Bas111 where SWSI O 1 O 1d nt1f 1u<.! a ', I
perc ent gap be tween water n eed s a nd wa ter supplies in the 80~1r Oy 2050 W tc1
conservati on 1s one method the SWSI repo rt 1de nt1f1ed for meeltng this q. p
Dry-Yea r Wat er Supol y
Eng lewood owns several ve ry senio r wa ter rights lhat diver : from tho So uth Pla tt River
at Union Aven ue . While .hese water rights provide th e Ci ty with an amp le su po ly ol
water. in dry yea rs, such as 2002 and 20 12 . th e low s tre amflow 1n the rive r . toge1t1 r
w1 tn the demands for wate r from ol11 er se nior right s . may result n r, C ity , ~o nior riv er
rig l1t s not being able to µrov1tle tile City w1tl 1 «II o f tile wdlt:1 11 eetlt:\l
Una cco1mt od-for Wa ter Use
Th ere are tw o lypes of w~ter loss c.s th at ocr.11 r 1n w,1 tP.111!1ht 1es . app;irr,111 losse~ and
real losses Apparent loss es are paper losse; th at can be ca used by u s tom er .ne1e r
ina ccu ra cies. bi lli ng system data errors o r u riau t11 oriled con sun pt,ons Roal los ·c s are
those that are physicall y ,ost w1th1n th e d1s tn bu t1 on system . 1nc h .. d1r g til e w t r
trea tment pro.:ess
Engl ewood sla ff es tima tes tn at sys tem losses have verag o nine per~ n t for u,e last
few ,-~ctr s Eve n though naccoun ted -for wc1 ter lo!>!', rrth<J:-. r IHM, 11,1 11 lt::ll µt:m .. er ,t are
considered good by indus try standa rds t e C1tv de5ires to r clu cf 'hos • losses to eigh t
percenl
T he Ci ty does no l have ::tny nrt;1hlP li11'1 lt1 tinn t'lily nn , ,-P 11 1111 , tm rc; 11'1 Pri , hovP.
Beca use the Ci ty was proactive 11 1 their urra ~t ruttu r.., 1)1 11 111,riq dllrl 1.ons1 ru ·,,.,
Clua1 Wahn Solutions Inc
Ci t:,• of Eny le wood
10
•1 gl P\\•n nd s waler trC t1tr"1 r nt .1r:d storac, fa c1h :1es ar l"IO ~~ thtw -1dcc11att• to
-1crom modr1\P th e ir wa ter t.uppl1 e c;
Water Costs an d Pri cing
ThP EnglP.woo o U11ht1es W~IP.r Fund ac.coun t5 ro , rP ve nues a nd xp n ses assoc,al etJ
.., ll , p1u v1<1111 t.1 wa1e 1 St!rv ,c es tu City of E , ljlewuocl res ,den ts The Water Fund ,s one or
the C1 ty"s [nterpnse Funds , wh1 d1 ac~oun t for operatio rs that (~) are fin anced an a
o perated 1n a manner s1111,lar to private t.Jusmes s e nterpnses where the intent of the
gover~1ng body ,s that me co ~ts of prowl ing go els or servtc.es to lhe genPrnl [)11hl 1c. nn
a co~u n wng bas is be financed 01 recove red pnm anly 1hroug usPr charges or (b,
where the C it/ C ot.in c!! !l as dec!ded that periodi c c e term1 na t1 o n o f re•.•er.ue earned .
ex penses 1r'lcu rred and /o r ,e, in co me 1s oopropnute fo r ap1 la l mrn r lennncc , public
poli cy , man agement controls acco untabll1ty or other p urpo ~s The Water and Sewer
Board provides gL1dan ce an d overse es the Wate r and Sewe, En terpri se Funds and
, el a ted activities
Char es /or Wate r Servi,::_~
Tl1e C,t y of Englewood sets 11s wa te r and sewer ra tes ba sed upon cost-o'-s cTV1 ce
principles Eng lewood charges on y en ough to cover the cost or ,ts operat n~s and to
rna ,n ta,n a reasonable co tingcn cy for omcrgcnc,cs
All FnglP.woo c1 w.1 tP r rt,~~ sewP.r r.ustom ers ;:uP. grouped mtn one of two custorr,er
classes (re,,"ent,al or curnmerc,al) and by whether the~ live 1ns,<Je 01 u uts1ue oi
Fnglewood Cost-o f•servrc e rates recove~ costs from ea ch customer c las s 1r1 pro ponr o n
10 the cost of providing the se rvi ce to e,ich class
Tl1e ra tes ro, th e Eng le wu ocl waler ancl se wer service area a re app 1o ved by the
Enylewoou Water and Sewer Board and th e Eng lewood Ci ty Council nfter a review of
lhe rP venue requirements and costs uncerly •ng ,iry rate proposal There 1s a publi c
comment peri od (thirty days) pnor to lhe Council's voting on the prooosed ra tes New
m i es ~e c.ome eflecuve rh irty n ays alter Lo1111c11 approva l
There are tw o orn po nents lo [ngle "'ood 's nntered wale r rates a per 1,00 0 ga ll ons
consumpti on cha rge and an adr 1n1 st ra ll ve cha rge to cover s uch thin gs :1 the cost of
meter reading an c billing Fnr residenc es o r h11s 1n esses w,th water meters larger th an
3 14" there is d m1nim c1 m charge based on the Sileo, the water 'Tl eter All r.us tor ,1e rs are
tJ1 iletl u:' a uarterl, ba s,,
lt-itr W ,ll••r StJl11 11v 11 -.. In,
r.1 1v ot Eng1t.1w ood
10 I J Wnt cr Cu11 ,er 1,1t 1o n Pli1r1
11
•
•
•
• Table 2.4 -City ol Eng lew ood 201 2 Metorod Rates Inside C ity
Quartert Cons um lion per 1,000 gallons
F11!it 400,000 allo11~
-Inside Cltv Minimum Chara•
Con sumption
Total Included In
Quart erly Mini mum Minimum
Meter Size Chara• Adm ln Fee Char1e (G allons)
5/8" S~Sl SB .SI N/A t\one
3/4" S9 71 S9 71 N/A f\on e
1· S8J 10 $10 74 $72 36 11.000
I 1/4" S 104 2, Si l 16 $92 09 18,000
I 1/2" 5 158 82 SI0.81 S 148 0 1 •11,000
2 ' 5249 66 Sl l .85 $236 81 72.000
3 . $46 1 66 $17 64 5444 0) 135,000
4" $764 51 S/4.4 8 $740.03 125,0CO
6" SJ,45 7.91 540 01 Sl.41 7 50 450,000
/IOIP 11"11 mrumum Charge Pill<; Irle illlllllfltSltat1•Je ICCCQuals in .. Total Ou;nlt" ( C h,11y .. • Table 2.5 -City o f Englewood 2012 M etered Ra1es Outs id e City
Quart ert Consu
OUtslde City Minimum Charre
Consumption
Total included In
Quarterty M i nimum Minimum
MeterSbe Chara• AdmlnFee Charie (Gallons)
5/8" SB 58 S8 58 N/A I Non e
3/4" S9 n S9 22 N/A No n e
l " Sll2 80 SI I 36 S IU ! 44 11,UOO
1 1/4" S14 l lb Si l 1, 5 129 .1 I lS,000
I 1/2" S2 1B I/ SIO 6) $207 50 41,000 . 53.\.l ~9 512 60 S3Jl 9'J 72.000 -J' S6l96l S17 14 $G22 49 13!:.,000
" )1 ,0'i7 04 ':i l t) 'i7 $1,037 48 m ,ooo
i 6' S;>,0,19 iQ $4012 52,008 90 I ,IIQ,000
•, ,IC ~hP ,.. r1m .n-ri,-i,g;;, ou., l "lt' Jllf1!n•!.lJJ'1:.-'"" .,,,1..::1t c; ''11! • ... ,, ~• 1:w ..,., ':t,:u ·••
• Clea, WJte , So l11t1c 11 s Im.
C+ty o• EnqlE!w cod
20 13 Wa l er Con s erv~tion P lan
I r glc•w, r·d \~1l1:l, ''"' <•r 1c,1 f.~ £ ~1 rC' bas on the r zr: lf rr
· , 111 ar~,11\ r c;:c nt1. I urn tc.. nd c mmer 1a\ fivtu re u11 c; r'I F
Hlt"I wa 1 r c:;v.::tf!m tonn ec tnn cr1;irqes
,1 H ,1 I r :bt1 .) ,or 1f
llnw,r1q t.:1n p<. rl P[;1 rl
fab l,; 2 6 S1ng lo-U ao W ator Systcrn Conncc t 1on Ch o rg oti
lns lmClty Outs ide City
I MeterSiae Conntdlon Ftt Connection Fee
VR o r 1/d" S.: 360 00 S ',40.00
I SI 2/0.(XJ SI0,90~ :xJ
I 1/2° s1•.~oo S2 1. 750 00
_1_ -Sil.JOO 00 Sl 4 950 00
J ';,4b,~OO OU 169, /~O JO
.. Sil, 100.00 S\09,050 00 -k $1/4,400.00 ~l&l.(,00 00
T he mul11-farn,l y r es1d en 11al Na \er s ys1em co nne cuon charge ,s \he lol a l of \he ~a se fe"
p l11s \h e f1P.r -clwe ll,ng 11 ni1 l e e ~or m 1111 ,-am , y waler cnnnec 11o ns l ees 11 all :ie l he
qreater of I ) 11,e su ir of tile 111u lt1-fa rrn ly co n11 ec11011 fees or 2 ) tl,e 111e1e r siled oa sed
con ne ct,o n fee per the Singe-U se Water Connecti o n Fee schedule above
I ab l e 2.7 -M u lt1-F amily Re11t td e nllal Water Syitem Con nect ion Ctm r ge s
l ne Water Sy 1em Connec tio n c·,a rqe to, Mixed Use Re s1d en11 al anu C ur11r11e11 .d i
propen re s ,s the comllina t,on of the M ul t,-raml\y Res 1dent1 al Conn 11 011 Ch,.rqe nd ·hr,
C o rn m e rc ial Mixed Use Wate r Connecti o n C ha rg e
Tab le 2.8 -Comm ercl.il Mixed Uso Wat er Conn ec tion Charges
I Insi de C•tv !outside Citv
[1 r'i t l.'5 f-1,t urr Un 1H S81 "O 5 1/4 10
1N '-••1 ;,c,o • ntw ,1 lJ n•t '> S I~ 00 S'>I IO
lo ve , i/', I .. ltll t' Urn t ~ )l~ C0 ':>lb OJ
L h!,l l W ,1\t}! ')vlu ,on; Inc.
C1 1y o t Eii91ow .>c1 d •
•
•
•
Poli cies an<.t Planning Init ia t ives Affecting Water Us e
Mun ic1• al Code
E:n glewood s mun IcI pal cod includ es an ordinance ,n wh ,ch Nater shall be used only for
benef1c1 al purposes an d shall never be wa s ted Th e o rd ina nce spec 1f1cally proh 1b1;s
water frorn oeI ng wasted oy wate ring publ,r wolk s, dnveways o r stree ts while irr ga ting
ad 1~cen l areas
Current Water Conservation Act iv it ies
The C,ty has 1nst1 tuted the fol lowing wa ter conservation measu res and program s
• Pu bl c Informa tion
• Mt::ter Reµh:Jt..:t::11 1t:nl
En glewood Meter Assi stance Program (EMAP )
• Lea k Dete ction
• Pl umbing Code
• Non-potable ano Water Reuse
P11 hhr. lnfor ~tion
Cu rrently, the C ity has an annua l ne ws letter ca lled "The Pipeline" that Is sen t to all ,ts
water usor G This ne wslett er is use d to tnfurm tho ci tizens of Eng ,cwood abo ut vario us
u~lily issues includ,ng wa ter co nserva ti on ideas Add 1llonally , bro ch J re s an d
in forma tion regard ing water conservation Is readi ly available al Cit y Hall
Meter Repla ce mem
The City of Englewood ,s commi tted ,n ,t s ettort to meter the en tire City to provide a
accura te measurement and record o f wa ter use to aid in the pro motion of water
conse rva tion . Metenno has been used to make cus tomers more aware or how niur.h
wa ter th ey are using and to eq ut :db ly distribu te the costs of the ope ration and
ma intenan ce of th e water sys tem Presen tl y the City has 80 percent of their customers
mP.1P.rerl
Th e metering program Is enfo rced t rough the City Code whi c h req cires the in st al lat,on
of meters ,r fl at rate ho mes when th e property ownership changes On a weekly ba sis
the C,ty checks re~o rd s of transac:tI 0 s In the Ci ty and if these tra nsac ti ons indica te t11at
ll1e ownership of a flat-r ate ac ount has ch a nged the City immediately s end s the owne ,
a ,ot,c e to 111 Sldll a 11 1t:ter his requ IreI 11 ent wa s adop ted 11 •Ile Cod e Ma rci , 198 7. aml
has oee n successful in comerting ap~rox,mately 22 0 flat rate to metered water per
year w hich has re su ted ,n a O ~erc ent reduction ,n peak wa ter us e
Clc;;r W ;.1er So lu,,o,,s 11 11... 20 13 Wa t cr Cor.sorva t1011 Plan
Cny of E· Jl ewood ,.
I hr-< 1ty al'5o t -a':i ar on 4rn.,q pr grarn of m e e r rf pa ir repl cP.ri1 nt nn rpr.::1b bre-t1on
Th met I rcad111q "C'prur lc ohb r 11,n and me ter ourcri asc-nr e approx n,~lely 'v.io pe rc .l
n the budg t
Cn lewood Me rer Ass ,s r,1n ce p_-o , ram Help wi th sv11rch1rq 1rom fla r ra te rr. me re,erl
~'late r
II an F nglP wo0<1 wc1 1e r cu stomer is interested r sw ,tch1 1g from 11al ra l e to a wa1er
111 1e r. !he U t1l lues De partment has a progra m .,a 1 helps "'"""ge li te exµePse of
w1 t01 11 1y ~ct ll eu 11,.,, nylewuuu Me 1e1 A s isld11 ~e Pr,:,qram (EMA )
U nder th e fl al rat e pla n (11on-me1ered cus tomers), small lam il,es typica ll y pay fo r more
wa te r than th ey actua lly use, especially dunng !he winter month s The EMAP progrnn,
tak e the d iff erence between what cu:;tom cr:.; poy fo" the no t rn!c ond 1.Nt1Jt cuz tomcr ~
wou ld pay for th e n1c .~rnd ra te an d use s tha l money to he lp pa y !he cost of installing
th e wa ter meter
I he cost of the m eter, yok e ana ,nstallat ,0 11 ,s about $~00 I l1e yokP ,s rt A~1g 111,rt tn hA
P.rl Sy tnr ~ hnme nwnP.r tn m<.tr1II b•Jl lhP U 1ht 1P.s OP.!)t=tr tmP.n t will inc lude tt1e cos t of a
pl u mber to complete ,nstalla t,on ,n th e EMAP pro g ra m De ta ils are included , Figure
2.6 belo w
Le k R
The C ity o f Englewood ,s ma king a large eflon to reduce the amo unt o f leakage to 7c ro
The C ity ha s funded tho upgra ding and rep lacement of olde r deteri orated water mains
rl11 s is poss ible th rough a cap ita l 1mp1 overr•:c:1'i program , whi ch d uring lh e next te n yea rs
,s e xpecte d to soend $500 .000 on wat e r sys tem u pg rad es
The C ity water departmnnt perfo rms le ak surveys whic h include p,essu re drops
su rfa ce wa t e , complaints and ,n vest1gal1 on o f d1rt 1 wat er ro111 p lR111ts
') I he C 11y ·s ma1n 1enan cP r rPw s r.---.pnnrl ~c; t.nnn ~~ r,n c.<.1h,H , ::t rer,nr1 nf rl CII Jiil
or dP.lected teak s I h Ay RSse ss each s1t 11a t1on 1nd1v1cluall y by mak ing the
aooropna te shu to tt to isolate th e te ak and reduce the vo lu me o f 10s 1 wa te ,
T 1,., C ity 1,a s a dop led a yslemattc repair and rep 1ace~1ent p roq rarn lo upgrade tts wa te r
~ys tem and avo id ea ks
C tc,11 Wd1 ~1 Sv h 1t1u11., Im
C:t ty n l fnql .... w ooc1
201 1 Wi'lt P,r Con!lerval •o n P 1an
•
•
•
•
•
•
Figunt 2 .6 -EMAP Oot.1 1ls
\\II I I! Ill 111< 1,,1,1 \'I I \L IU I 111 'I
The City of Englewood 's Pl crnb mg Code requ 11e s wa ler•S d .inq dev ices for all new
const ruc1ton T ese watH-corser"ng devices include ma«mum I 6 ga ll or-per-flush
lo1lets , 2 5 qa lons-per-'1mu te (qJm ) la uce ts and 2 5 qpn, s owe raeads
Clern W rHf'r So lll ln>nc. !111.;. 2013 W al er Co11s rv.1 110 11 Plan
C1 1y of ny 1ow o0Ll
16
.!'.Ya e, n us and Non porablc Sys er•1s
I the P'ese, I t,me , t11e only reu•a bl e or fully cons umable wo ler ngn ts Ihm Eng lewood
owns are the consun1 pt1 ,e use ent1tle ments de creed for lhe charges of Fnglewood s
inte res t 1n th e Nevarl a Ditch the M c Broom O,tct1 and the B 1own D tct1 % well as lhP
Auro ra Delivery O bh p li on and Borea No 2 Dit ch Howev er, because Englewood s
pr;, t1ce t1a s been 10 ,e,1 se th ese ully reus able ent,tl errenls lo Cenlenn,a l W a•er arri
S arn ta uo 11 0 1str ic1, lh Are n;i~ been htile orporlllnit y for Englewood s ac t ,al re 1tse of
lh se sou rc es Cu rrenll y , 100 percent of the ba ckwash al t11e C1 11• wa ter 1rea1 mer1 p1an1
lh recycle<J ba d , 111 10 i11e 1realnien1 Drocess The C1 1y uses the 11011-po lalJ le wa ler
, eleased f,nm t1 1e pl an I for rri yali ng lhe tu rf dround the trea tm ent plan t
The Cit y do es , however provide w ater from the sen,or '860 C ty Citch wa ter right
wt11cr 1::; u:.;cd to 1rn ga tc the C·1cr ry Hi Is Country C lu b 1r1 Cherri H lls Vtllagc ond scvcrw
small custom ers ::,long the dit ch
Clc c1 1 W ,1\tH Solu11011~ 111 1. 20 1 .. Wa ttH Cun~er\ Jt1011 P t~11 1
C1 1y ol Eny lvwood
I'
•
•
•
•
•
•
CHAPTER 3 • WAT ER USE AND DEMAND FORE CAST
Use by Customer Catego ry
In 201 1, Eng;ewood 's tota l wa ter producllon ro r both metered ana non -meterrd
custom e•s was estima ted to be 5,606 acre-feet on-,,ete red wa ter use was
esllma ted based 01 t1e to tal water producllon . !he ,nown water u se tor metered
cu stom ers and the nn e percent syst em loss es11mate provided by Eng lewood
staff Table 3.1 sum mari zes water use per custom er catego ry from 2005 th rough
20 11
Tabl e 3.1 -City o f Engl e wood W ater Use
Me tered Non-Metered
S1n6le Mu lti•
To tal E~timat ed Wate r Total
Comme rcia l 1ndus tr ia1 Mu nicipal Metere d Use of No n-Metered Water
'fear
Famil y Fa m ily
Wa terU~e Customers Use
,ere feet acrt:? feet .tc rc fe et i,cre feet acre feet .tcre feet acre feel acre -fe et
1005 1832 Y94 1.]07 JIO 61 • J,61, -}'}42._ __ ..22¥_
1006 1161 1.149 111.1 147 17 5 199 l .S0 2 ),700
I !I_ 112_I ~ %6 s~ -!.L ~ 1'/0 6,100
7 )8 113J 1,0I 1 05! ,11 9 0 J 7 l l.880 6,64 1
10)9 l 703 1.,1:9 884 43.1 M ~ 1.118 5572
1010 197 \ l ,ll£, 1!67 ,I/) 10 ,l 'i,07 1,'.<)8 i~
101! I 918 1.147 88} 505 Id J.4 77 1,l]l)
Averag~ 1,964 1,160 1,039 478 23 •.663 1,1121
Tap s and Wate r Use Summary
T he to tal number of rietere~ and non-metered tap s per custo m er ca tegory is
sh own in Table 3.2 through Table 3.4
T able 3.5 sh ows the estimated metered wa ter us e per tap ro, each customer
ca teqory from 2005 thro uqh 2011
5,606
6,484
C lear W il tilr So lul l':,11-. lrH
Cit y o f Enyte.vood
20 13 Waler Conser vat1011 Pl an
18
1 abl e 1 'J C11y o t Eng lewood M ete rrd T a ps by Customer C:H egory
Total
VeM Si ngl e Multi -
V1rilblt Family Fami ly Commerci al Ind ustrial Munic ipa l Ritt Taps ta ps laD! taps taus tans
100, ) Jl)8 blU Y!:19 u I 6,937
2006 ., 989 /-10 1,022 12 J 7,765
I 2007 6 J88 148 1,017 12 I 7,867
I_!~ G 22 1 7~<;1 -~ I? J -~ ------2()0') 6,3lb /bf, 1,013 I~ J 8,129
Will h.171 192 l,Obl 13 ! 8,442
)0 11 6 7 1~ 788 1.01 8 I} j 8,596
Table 3.3 City of Englewood Non •M ctcrcd Tnps by Cu stomer Category
r Total I
I
Vear Si ngl e Multi· Fixed Family Family Commercial lndu str l~I Mun ici pal Rita Tops ta ps taps taps taps tao5
2005 2 60 1 225 8 2 0 2,836
)()Of; 1 ,r.1 )0 1 R ) 0 2,573 I
2007 2249 188 8 2 0 2,447
1008 2 14b I I/ I 2 f-_Q_ 2,332
2009 2 0<1 7 115 7 -_) 0 2 231 .
20 10 I 983 169 I } 0 2,161 !
?01 1 I 897 H,8 I I 0 2,074
Ta bl e 3.4 -City o f Engle wood Total Taps by Cus tomer Cateyury
I
'fea r Single
Family
ta !i. --
/00~ 1 909
)Q()f, 8 lSI
)007 8 337
)008 8 36 7
I OO'J 8 383
)0 10 8111
)0 1 I 8 6 12
(.tf•dr W ,1tc r Soh.J tu11 1.._ tn
1,ty , f F !lC,IPW l)Ull
MtJl!I -
Famil y Commercia l
~~-taps
8/!J %I
'HI 1,030
936 1,01S
936 t.DlO
9-1 1 I 0 10
%1 1,0 '0
9 \b 1,08 1
Told
Industrial Muni cipa l T■ps
taps taos
I I I 9,nl
14 l 10,338
14 1 10,314
I 14 l 10, JAO
14 J 10,360
11 l 10,603
1-1 J 10,670
10 I 3 W a tc , Constjn,;1no 11 Pl.111
•
•
•
•
0
•
Tabl e 3.5 -City of E ng lewood Water Use per Tap (metered customor s)
Si ngl e Mulll -
Year Family fam ily Co mm ercia l Industrial Mun ici pal
acre • acre -acre -acre -acre-
fe et/tao feet /tao feet /tao feet/tao fe et/tao
2005 0 23 , 1:1 I 35 28 02 9 10
2006 0 26 I 21 I 28 39 08 10 63
2007 0 23 l 26 0.94 38 95 Vie
2008 071 I l3 I 03 79 95 0 00
200'J u w I '>I U8 / JU98 ) ~j
N IU U lJ l ll U 8 1 J l '>'> 8 u,
20 11 0 22 I 20 0 8 1 J b ()'J ) /',
Avcra2e 0.24 1.24 1.01 33.52 6.66
Per Capita W ater Use
Per cap it a wat e r use. bo th sys tem-wid e and rcs 1dent .:1 1 on ly 1s a common l)' used w y to
gage an entity's water use habits Sys tem -wide per capita use can vary signi fi can tly
between ent1t1es depend ing on the type of non-r es1den t1a l cus tomers withi n the syste m
Englewood ave rages 171 GPCD sys tem-wide wi th an es timatec 89 GP C D for
resid ent ial uses lrom 2007 to 2011 as shown 1n Table 3.6 Due to lack of spec1'.ic
res1dent1a l wa ter use and populat ion for non-metered customers . the res 1dent1r,1 GPC D
may be skewed
Year
T;a ble 3.6 -City o f Englewood Per Ca p ita Water Uu
Total Water
Use (Metered
and Non-
Metered
acre -fe et
Metered J
Residential Water
Use (Sin,ile ond
Multi Family)
aae-fee t
I System Reside . ,tial
Popu atlon Wide GPCD GPCD
--t------i-------+-----1----------1 ~ _ ..hl._00 , ___ Jc_,09_8 ___ -+-_37_1_9_1-+ __ 1_7_7 --~
~ _ ~&!! 3,19 1 31 191 184 91
2009 ;, ½12 3.123 32 . 1 155 81
2010 6, lO~ .l, 1-1 7 30 155 180 93
2011 5,60l, ; ~7', 30 ffi 165 91
Ave rage 3 }4 / ll 4 17 171 89
Clt•,u Wa1c r So lulton,;,. In ,
C•t } u f E 11y1u ... ooa
201 3 Water Co n~orv a11 on Pl;-1 11
20
In Co lorado a sIq111 f1ca111 poruon o :«He ' c1 se I pIca llv occu rs ou ldoois fo 1 11 nqat, 11 To
it:l er 111n e E,_, I woods a,er ge ou td m llSe we ass um ed e il'ierag res1 de1 1t1ar nr11 t
;vould u& 50 ;:,er cent or 1 1<i e 1r w ter for o td oo r 1rng at 1on 1
De mand For ecast
The rn aJQn ty or E11gl cwuuu ·, land drea w,is c evelo peu uu11 ng i11e post World War II e ra
ctween 1945 ;rnd 1960 A s 1s c•11dent hy th e popula t•on da t A ore sen tcd ,, Table 2 .1
Eng lewood 's populal1on g ro wth is lim ited and not expected to ncr ease d urin g the
i,lannmg i,P.n o rt I hP.rn fo re , avP.rag!' waIer use (See Table 3 .1) a nd average wa te r use
p er tap fiq ures (See Ta ble 3.5 ) 'or 11,., 1Jen d o f 20 0 5 -2C 1 are used 10 foreca st ful ure
wat er use
'J\r.c:n rdina 10 Don \'ttr 1N ,1tor rfat:1
Clea, w:,ie, ~oluti ons Ill\;
Cny o f E119l0wood
•
•
•
•
•
•
CHAPTER 4 · WATER CONSERVATION GOALS
Goa l Development Process
The e'lelopmenl or water-savi ngs go als for E nglewood wa s a col labo ra11 ve
pr0cess ,nvo lv in y Clear WaIe 1 Solutio ns and Ci ty st aff lr.formaI1on was g athere d
fr om bi lling reco rds and exis ting pl anrn ng docu m en ts lo fl'Ope rly characteri ze the
sy stem reso urce s and wate r us e Development of :h ,s data showed the C1Iy·s
larges ! wa te r us e cu sto mer ca te gories . seaso na l us age , sysIe,n l1 mi lalion s an cl
los ses . and uth ned the C1 Iy·s e xIs tI ng cons ervation effor1 s and their es timated
effe ct iveness
We rn e I w,th s taff to dis cus s wa ter-savings goals and t1 e po tentia l methoc s to
rea ch tho se go als In itial re duc tion pe rcentage s we re es tab lis hed and a
urn versa l hs l of mea sures and prog rams were compiled for con si de rati o n The
go<1 ls foc used on lne w ale, u~e area s !11a I coul d ~e suc,~essfully 11 ,µa c ted
consid ering factors such as wa ter savings po l enI ,al. co s ts . ccn l rol . McJ publ ic
.:i cc cpt.:in cc
Water Conservation Goal s
Establ ishin g wa ter cons ervat ion goals ,s an ,Ierat1ve process tha t begi ns w it
qua ntifying the lulure deman d for wa l er based on curre nt wat e r-u se hab its an d
identi fy ng areas water u•;e ca n fea sibly and e ffectively b e red uced E nglew ood .
according lo th e Plan ning De partm ent's prOJec t,on. ,s no t expected to increa se ,ts
wa ler dema nd th rough new g rowth However , the C,ty would still lik e 10 :ed uce
overal l deman d t,y Ie11 pe rce11 I in !he next !e n year s
Discus sio ns wi tn C1Iy s taff fo cuse d on th e desire to con tinue a nd expa nd
Englewood 's EMAP EM AP tak es the d iffe ren ce be tween wha t the custo mer
pa ys for the non-metered rate and wha t the c us tom er w ou ld !)ay for the m ete red
rate and uses that money to elp pay the cos t of in sta ll ;'lCJ \he w ater meter
Pa r1 1ci pat,on ,n EMAP ,s opt,onal If prcv,ded a grant by tn e CW C B , Englewoo d
would hke to exJand upon thei r curren t progra m by prov,d ,ng 50 to 100 meter s al
no cos t to the cus tomer wl11le the c us tome r co nt inues to pay th e fl at rate charges ,
as fur1 he r ,ncent,ve for meter replace ment If th e cus tomer conver1s , the money
received by tne C ity wo uld go to prov1d111g a meter for anoU,er fl at rate customer
In ad d it io n to !he EMAP expa ns,on , C,ly staff disc uss ed pos sibly cx par ,d ing
ed uca il on al program s Ir a! encourage res ,den~al ca:ego ry (S,ngle-Fam,ly and
Mult ,-Fam,ly water us e rs) wa l er co nservaIIon a nd may a lso ,mpa cl lh fl
Com merc ial an d Indus tri al cus tomers as we ll C,ly st aff c 1scussecl the desire 10
e xp lore pe rforming a w ate r ra te stu d y w ~,c ~ wou ld ensure tha t the Ci ty has a fair
rate str cu re tha t co uld provide ,ncen t,ves 'or custom e rs 10 save Na ter
Clei!.~ Wate r Solu 110 11 s l11c
City of Engle wood
2013 W a!ur ConservM 1on Pla n
22
Ir .:1 11 :n~ nu,,1 1 'J,, ,, r r,,1v1r'\9c. q ·1,1lr, lot hf> City VI P J(lo lo.ed .1· ft)(! c:. pre:1 1 v~lie• L I' p.:i•
·11c.; r1111 P r r 1ea0 r y rtn<I lh 111111 trt'1n r n f the water .;11r,p 1) C:V'-> pm fabl e 4 1 1.:;hn1,,"'
•1111 .-t l <.a d ts ~stanus t~e,1 )r .J d ct cu--tomer ca teq r.ry
l able 4 1 -Eng lewood W ater Conserva11 on Goa ls
·-
Total Projected
Water Use
Water Use C1te1ories : l2013to >0221 Reduction Goals for Plannl,. Horilon
\AF) 1'6 ) \AF)
~rn gle • I· amtly IY,t>1 2 5 Oli, 982
M u l(I family 11 ,601 5 (JI,, 580
Cu rnrnt.•rdttl 10,387 }'j°'f, /60
ln dll ~(nal 1 7:8 2 sv 1n -
Mun1c10,1I ns 0 51\ l P
Non-Metered Cv~torm:1 ~
M P!Pr RP plMP n1Pfl l .l nc1
FMA P is m, 1,1,;, ~ ll, 1
Un;1crn11 n1Nl fo r I n <..c;p ,;,
lrn rren l lv 9%) > 836 8 c,, 6'18
I Tot.1 1 Wate, Product io n 70 6 77
ro tal Uemand ►il'du ct1 0 11 --'~
Iota! Pc rcc 111 Reduct i on . Bl,,
/\/oU•~
•1,li'"r -,,.m.,lfor{,, / ll•,~c;11;1/ ·1:·•11, -1•1.~1> 0",lt,,ri,, ,.~,,,,,,•1•rif',f,~•"'·~,1,,,01o ◄ ,, ,,
A't<c/v,.,',("' v,11 'urt.i 1·•111,1 /\rl"' ~, ... i--•••11••' r A ,11 1t'1 1n,,Jfl,. A ~.;,rr,,.. ~t, .... e "J•i:'"•l·Jctl
$111 <1/e Fam,/\' and M u /11-Fam,l y Co nse,vat,on Goals
Tile per •caplld wa ter us e ,n Englewood 1s comparable to the avera e 111 Colo rad o
C ,,ns ,denng tha t th ere are <I number of exis tin g 01oas ures that ca n be un proved and
naw measur es t at ca n be 1n lrod uc ed . the red11 c1 1on go;1 I was c;p\ r1 1 flvP nPrr:Anl Ir.,
s,ngrc-Farn,I,-and rv'u ll1-Farn ,Iy ca tegor ies
Commc1c 1a1 .1 n •dt1 511 ,al C:onsorv arion Goals
T11e Commerc,a ca tect orv ,~cl ,,1e, b 1Is ~01 hm ne c 10 rasp 1a I1 11 restaura nts retar
r eal hcare. ca r wash e s and sc hool s eca use 11,e1e are mary ·10 ., of Commer c ==1i
(...tcc11 Wd t e1 :::iutU I I\JII .. tn,
C ity t)f F n gl1>w o<1 rl
J.Ot \ Wa1 c 1 C.o nSC!fV.tllO!l P l ;11 1
•
•
•
•
•
•
and lndust 11a l cus tomers, actual sav in gs are d1ff1 cul t to pred ict For now , a goal of 2 5
percent ,s es timated for the Commerc ,a l and In du strial ca ,g ones
Munic ,p al Cons eivarlon Goals
Eng ewood rac ks wat er use ,n and su rroundmg Ci ty-owned properties We estima te
tha t a r .5 perc ent sa vin g s can be act>, ,ed th roug water conservat,o n measu r s
ta rge t,n,;i th,s ca tegory
Non -Metered Customer Conserva t,on Goals
E·,entually , al no n-metere d cu stomers w,I 1 be conve rt ed to metered cu stom er s We
es t,ma le tha t With thP me /e r rPplacement ancl EM AP prog rams , r1 15 percent sav,rgs
can be ach•e ve d throug h waler conse rvation mea ur s Ia rgetIng th ,s a l egory
Unacco unted for Los sea
The average loss 111 the sysle ,n due to leak s, recor cl keep ing errors , th eft. or lack of
measu rer11en1 (non -metered cus to111 ers } is es timated at about n111c ercen t uf the water
production . Tl Ie goal for the City is to reduce t e sys tem lo sses by one percent bring ing
them to eig ht p rcent
C le ;:ir W a!O r So lt1 11o n ~. In c. 20 13 Wi\t or Conserv ,1t 10n Pl.111
City ol Engl w oo d
2J
I I
C HAPTE R 5 CONSl:'r~V ATION M EASUR SAND PR OG RAM
Wat er Conserva tion Mea sures and Progrnms
We de velo ped d u11 Iver saI lis t of cons at,on meas ur s ana prot1 ra111 s 11·
11 1t:dS u r~~ di U p 101..1 1d•11:::, wt;j,~ ;.,lc1 Led 1,110 l,ve 11d1u1 t.:c:l e1.1rn 1e::-Ut l1t~·
fl.1a,~te a n e Pro qram s. equla:ory Co ntr ol ~ and Standa rds Educat ion al
Pr grams . Rebates and Incent ive Pr oqrarn s anU J\ud,t r,ogram s n~e urnversa t
IISI 1s st,ovm 1n Table 5., \JI.1 th ex 1s t111 c; measu re s high lighted m green
Scre en ing Criter ia
T h~ fo ll ,ny ~creermg ,...,,1 ri a we~e ,;orn p1led as erJ on discussions 'Nt th staff
I he cntPrI.a wer,, r hosPn as ;, genera scr P n, g 10 pare down t~e universal list to
n h ·tor mea~ures ran d progrnr ns 10 evr1ll1 r1I P. ft1r1her 111 r.1t1r11ng rnv1F:WirHJ r.ns l!-. 10
,mp ement. xpected Nater sa vi ng s, and lo s o r rev nLe fro m the water s~•11 ng s
nc li mt:tctsure ct nd µruy r'1r ri m Table 5 .1 w;,.1 ~ st.re ened N H~, the foll ow1r,q nuena
1 S taff Time
2 Fina nc ial ,mplicat,ons
3 Po l,t,cal rom ,f cn t,on s
Screen ing of Conservatiun Measures and Programs
The purpose or th e initial creening wa 10 crea le d 11st or 111easures a11 (I
programs th at wou ld be eva luated furthe r in the plan n,ng process via a cosl -
benof,t analysis A meet,ng wa s held with City staH ano W ate r B ard to d, cuss
coch measure/p rogram on the universal hst and hrninn te one s lhn t were not
feas ible using the established screeni ng cri teria
I lie lis t ot measures was also eval uated lo de lerrn ,ne ii the CWCB M 1ni111u111
RP-OlmP.r1 W;11er C onsArv.:1 110 11 P tr1n FIAmen 1c. wtuP r1rlrP.sc.Pl1 I hP rpq111rP<1
WCB elemen ts ,n cIl I0e
• Wa1er -effi c1ert r,x ture s and appliances ,nc·ud,ng :o,It11 s s11owerl10ad s .
;inu rm,cets
• Low wo \ 1 U::tt: lc1 1Hb t.c:.tl)t·!~ tl ruuyl 1l res1S1.itll veyult:1t1 un Iu11Iuval uf
phreatophyl es (a dee,, rooted plant Iha ! obt ains waler from the wa ter table
or the la ye r of soil Jus t above 11 In 1
1udes ott nwo ds tan,arisl-.. e: 1,
and ert,c, nt ,rr gat,on
W lt::r -effl c1e r \ indus trial :;rnd commercial wJter u::ic r"o sses
W le r re use Sys te ms
D1 c;:r t'°'1.t1nr, c;y'.".t~ff• IP.rtl< 1rlr,nt1 f,r.c1t 1-:,., :1rr! r i)a1r
Clu .u W tl t..'1 Sulu l 1u 11 , 111
C,ty of F rig h,....,ooCI
01J Wat N <.on~tt1'J;:111 u 11 P t.11 1
•
•
•
•
•
•
• 0 1sscirunat1on o f mfonnatto r gard 1n water u se Hi 1ency measures. ,nclucll ng
by pubh educa t on ustomer water use aud its. anc w;a tEH ·s dv11 Iy
tl erno nst rallo ns
• Water rate str uc tures and b1ll1ng system~ des ig ned to encouraqc wa ter use
ef 1ciency ir1 a fi scd ll y res po ns,ole mann r
• RP:;julato ry 1easums es1gned to en courEqe wa te r co nserva tion
• Inc ent iv es to ,mplernent wa ter con· rvatI0 1 technique,. 1nclu cl1ng reb~'P.S ,o
custon,P.r,
The sc re en ing was co mpleted on October 3 , 20 2 and Noverr ber 13 2012 T~
resul hng dec1s1ons ore 1otod on Table 5.1
T ;\hle 5 1 -U n ivor r.i'lt List o f Con~orv:1 tio n M c1HHH CS and Progrnm s
Fur1her
Conu!rvatlon Measure or Proar1m Exlstlna Evaluation Comment
!i.u pply \id c UtllltY Maintenance Proa.ram ~
m (Hllur c ~ W&le , M elt:, COtl\lCl ')IUll lhe Cit y WQU l d me to CO lltlflUC the lUt/Cnt
H. P1 0.i1 M n
l)rnr,r;am, Eng lewood Mete, J\\\h l.ince
PrOPf.:lm
MPI M le,tingilnrl
Renl11cl'.'n1en t Pro ,u am
Sul· MNt>f Mohllf> H 'll\l
l',ll t..\
R,)~;;-;,I . 11~1t•1111 ~: 111 n,,..,.
mu 11 ta lnl V hOU!i l ntt
ln,t.t ling flllt •ter s 1n It'll'
U1 \lr1 b u ·1o n ~ Slf>ITI 10
l t.t ~ Oeth t 1on & Kf•i,~ ,
P!Ut\ldlll
l t!l k Detec t1o n lo1 M Hhl l
Ye,
No
NO No
No
No Nu
Nu
Ena tewood wou ld h h• to exp;rnd 1hl~ p10a r~m
Whf'll thPy have ~n 1\we with a 0111 then l hl!Y
r hf"t'~ anrl rP 1IMP n Pt Pr
R,•ly UII d l uu,I (tJ III h1 11V {11 I vr11 v l elt'
M,111>1 (o nu11ul'l1 t 1e1 --~-'N"'-o _ ---~ _
l f'dk Uf'l f'CltQn tn MO,l<it'
~"rnn Par ~.5 ''° "' Bl llhl So ltwarr I /1:uir ,1dc~ YO\ Ye, JuH upftr t1 dcd wi.l 1 • .m11rudc t'Ver v J to~ ~,'.I I )
W1h•• p 1,)v1dP1 1 li t y
l1 •1u 11>,1·1,1 1,1d,,\ ( 1Hl .)c1 ,ll,d /1, r pJtJy t, I J•' fll'W•'I ,ff,r ••rlt !1,1t11c-•. ,,,
~:w,,n,) N, N ' l ,1C1t l 1l'\,
!-IH'yrhng WIP I d te, f.ngll!wo od tc<yc1e-. lU0% ol th e bac kWil\h
l~\_h _____ __,. __ -f>----~--+---=------------f Ye< Y•s wMe,
\iV,t1P r Rf'm e Sy ~IPm
Cli,H W a ler S01u11v 11 '> 1,11
Ltt y OI t n uhl•11,·(;\"IC1
YP< Yes c;,.... Rf'f'y rli nf! WlP r 11(r1 Rukw,",h
20 13 Wator Conscr1,1,1t 1c,111 Pt;111
I Fur11wtr
!conservltlon Meaure o, l'roaram bt1a1111 l!nlulllon Comment
Ot1m .1 nd Re1ulatorv Controls Nd Staftdanls
\ldt'
& A,, • ,~,1 I I'• , • I• ·0 11 \tl.-
Jlf <l ~t ,rnh ~l II 1-•-• -
,lf,,1 1l'IIM " ,..,,,1, rl
'u • r1111I l d 1l d 'lt •l't'
i;,, •• ,I I ,,11\/Sf,1 ul,H I
N~w ( >Mtn,tt on
·--
I r !';d ll tH, ',v \\l'I'
F•!,l1.l1{'11•"1t•,/';1.1 Hl,l 11'. I ,1
N••N \ ,'1\II UI I 111\
w .. , .. , ~.1T p ..,,, If l!Pf> ( h.-rlPf>'.
(111111'I I fv a li,.,11011 U'
rol,r H"\ 1,,tt r n{ou 1ttgt'
"
1hr C•tv wou ld l1l e to e.,rp1 0,eecpand1ng
wdl n,Ulte§ thoil or .:tllf b ll Watf• ""<l ""
1r ,,,. , .-ti ' .. ,.,,,I'
-~
I!,, If A I I LIi I ii;!' 11 ! ~ '
I I~ 'l r ~P. M\l f'h 1< ,,•ti \If>. t '
A Id !.-,1JJ•1 llltt '!' \,., t l 11 Ju lt:",I I\. t ••'t• ,1 t II
Ii r •,:r.,·111 11•th,,r ,-! t ••!1••1 ,. rn.1•· #ll••r
..,,, ,,., ..
~"-' ·_.••K _, ____ _.__N __ o_.._ ______ ,_,..,,,,_,_,_11 _w_o,_,1,_, -"'-"-"-'-'-"-'-'''-'-•·-' ,1_,_, ---1
Educ:Mlonal p.--
thl/1n g State nltfltS tnat
[nco u r n e Wa te, Sa vlnir.s
•f'• 1\CdPf' l,~rden
tiemo1n t,a t1on
~ ... IH .J,lt:' l»r ,.1 g ,,1,n •c,
(<m•tll:'1t 1,i l ~-1'!!_1
>Pr!H /I OI~ P tllftl ,I rn I\ r O llt'I
5 DJC(' {IH)MJ '~l'
Sc hool £duc .1 t lon P1 og ,arn (.(
17 Fdu r .1110 n)
I 11•,! 11MIJ. 1<1• ,.\lph• 1 t1 11'
f.1ll\11IIP1•
llrl uw, •'\\II• w 111•, t\1 1
~H ,1r r
I d ll <1 l 1 JM itl \II ~
I r,1 <' t , \.l,111 , 'lr•r/•lOt.
No
Nu
No
N<>
.....
Program 10 be tomblne w th fl St hetlullng n
W11 rrBIII .
--
Eol11yedl Engli:wvotl hu~u ~1,._hvo l tl11lt.h e11 di
!lit w::,1c1 tr e:>t mcnt plant lo, V¥J tcr dav
( n111:-.,n ,><1 w,!h ,1 r I I 11 .i11 ,, Ril l 'i t u tff>• \
R.w at ,n .. 1;1.-;i,,11,•b Pln-.. __ _
f\f'jt "' ri g ,n !{'I\ [ngl••y,,onrf w.tl•''
r 11\t .,f'u ••, ,vii i h " ,, hl fl !(1 ,I ,,,~ tll f• ...,,,11 r 11 1
,,,1 1,, ..
f I rt ,11 :,r1 ,H'ri 'r>,_o_o,~p·--+--N--+----+-'-'"-'-' _______ _
'••!l fl ',(,l ' I 'ltl-'f11, i'
V\<1!t.-• 8 I "11
l,h•dl W ,11t:r Sullll!UII~ ll l l
C I ', o f F n yl9won1J
I ,,_.: ,, ,. rl "-'1' \'•·,1 , ti ,
!( 1•· l't''' 'I, !' A1 I p ·.,.~·· '1 ,,1,• ,.,1 .. ,1
1,,,,.,.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Further
Conservation Measure or Proa.rim hlstlna Ev~u•t~
Rebatn end lncen!lve p ... .,....,
01\tnbute Pt r1n\e)p J V
►\p,1(1\ 10 ferq au1,1n 1s &
lmt 'ut,on,
Reb a teP,o~rd "''SfN lol e!S
(101t-r\ W ,l',hf'f\
o,s hwa ,he•s <H C"1' ~nd
Shov.p •h;:i,1 Js
Ri>b atC\ to , [1 ISMMII
Sp1 1r ~l,r SvH +'rn "on 11 r I ,,
Zo o1r,1"''-'~I L.>c1ri•, f
\'11 ,Hheq
\ ,,te • (on,e rvatu,n
Up gi u 1r< to, (11v , a ,,,.~\
0 .1 tdoo1
\\JH:1 (er• -•~1~·J t 101•
IJD SLltJC'.o f0 1 (1t; rJ.I t c~
indoor
Xt ""il lW lnc e nl,v"") lo· ,111
t •1:.t i>m.r1 (JICi!Q I IC\
1r·1 g-'l1v11 Sy\tem(ft u.1"11ly
·•e,,le fl cba1 e\
\11.nn d 1nd/or R,1,n S"n'"or
RebiH OS t o r R0">1i.ion 1t.JI 01
Co mme•c1 .1 I
l o w In come l\et,of,1 Pro1>r,1m
(Ofl111 1t'I Cht l ',\.tit'! Autl I~
R,\ld.-nr1.:t l Aud,t Kil
Sp11 n kler liy!.Wlll .\ud1t Kd
c1 na lmlructI0n \
l rr1ga t Ion Aud t o l (,tv Pa r ~)
,ma Proi,ert,e(
• Sha ded cells r epresent CJ:ts1i ng mtasur t:!>,
C lc;11 W ttl f!f S ol11t 10 11<.,, llll.
t..11 y o l Englewood
,,,
No
No
No
N o
,..,
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
N,,
r10
Ne
No
'"
No
"o
""
No
"o .. ,
V,s
No
No
Comment
Std 'f tun11 ,11 1om
St al· llm•f,H IOM
No t fl l t:1Cl tt~(J I C• I lit!'(. J I , .. ,,,o n \
R,•0-v , 11,,1,•w1lt,f 1t H• n 1,,n,11 1>ff f'II '\
fle evdhl,H t' WI ti· 1u l II l o• J 1111,nt: ,~ff o ,',
ne-ev11 l uc1tc w 1tn fu1u ,e lctnnmv.elfor·\
c,tv H,d! 'NUl.hl 11 ',1• t o l'VJ IU,llt.' funh, ..
(1ty ,t.ill would l1 l e to eva l uate tunhi'I
Pe eva lua te w 1 tt> tuturJ> pL;inru ng ett o , "\
20~ J W.t l er COIIS ('fvat 10 11 Plan
18
C HAPT ER EVALU ATI ON AND SE LE CT ION
,~ inll 1i=t l c:;,r reenir-19 '1' rt)p n,p;:i c:;,, ff P.S ::1n<1 rrncJrrl nt!; Wit City 5t;:iff res ulted n
,P.le c ting I~ meas ures lnr fu rt her ev al uation Englewood would I1ke ;o eva!J at e
1a11 y of the el1n11na te d mea sures with future pla11 111 ng eflo1t~ Son , of the
11{:j dsur1::1 ::, t1c1ve t:ti 1.,ur 11b1 nec os 1,o tt:1 ~ n Table 5.1 T e t.iene f1ts a r d cos ts uf
:re sel ectec n,easures and programs are shown in Table 6 .1 Th e group ing of
: e measure s enao ed us to co nsi de r hke measure s ancl avo id double cm1nlmg
savings Details abou t the cos t-ben efit evalua tion an d ,,,form at or nbou t each
01co su re can be founc In Appendix A
Cost s and Water Savings of Conservation Options
Pnor to e val ua ti ng the poten1 1a l r ns1 e fl e ct1 1JP.nec.c;, nf thP mP..=1~1ire,1r rng rrim~. n
~ Im onrI;.in t 10 11 nc1ersr,i n<1 th e magni tude of typ 1r.2l 1ndoor and outd oor uses aod
t c con tri bution of ea ch to total demand There s a w ide range of use related to
each Hu.l our and outdo or measure 1ti c11 ccm ct Hecl u,e pute r1l1 ci l wc1 1e1 sc1 vi11y ::, anti
w s l effe tIvene~s acco rdingly The assumptions or calcula ting wa ter sav;ngs
Jsed for th is analysis were on the conserva tiv e er d of the ra nges found In the
avai lable wa ter conservatio n res earc h to a voi d ovc rcsll mat1ng sa ving s
Man~ resources we re used to estima te water sa v1rtgs 1ncl ud 1ng Arn y Vi ckers
Ha ndbook of Wa ter Use and Cons ervauon , stud ies and papers fr o"' Californi a
and Arizona . lo cal studies available from the Ame·,can Wat er Resour es
AssociHt1 0 ,, thA f nv1 ronmental P rn ter.t,on Agenr.~ W estern ResourcP
Adv ocates in for mauon fr om other Colorad o mun lc1pal1t 1es . and th e CW CB
website
Table 6.1 provides a co st-benefit ana lys is for all of the measures and programs
~r ev1ous ly identified 10 be evalua te d further A planning hon Lo n of te years ,s
used to quantify the fu ll benefit of th ese measures and orograms he c,:;sts ond
-N ot er so vings over the pl nnrn ng period arc calcu lated assum ing the
1easures/program s al l start in Year One This provid es an eqlll tab le rani,,,n of
the measures , so they can be com pared 011 an app les-to -app les b;a s1s In rc a Ity.
th e mea su res anrt p rogram s will be implemented accorr1 Ino tn thP
111 pleme n 1;a 11on schedule developed ,n Chapters 7 and 8
Th e first lou r columns (Columns A-Dl u f T~ble 6.1 1u e11 t1ly t11 e cu11scrv;,1 Iu11
Ineasure or prooram and quanlify the costs to th e Ci ty These cos ts include
ann al cos ts fa, rratenal s s taff time , an d one-t11ne start JP co s ts T11e ta ble thee
QJ a ou fie s Nater savings annually an d for the entire ten -yea r plan ni ng hori zon
Annual ...vat c r c;a v1 11gs and proicctc cl los t rev en ue ore bascc on ull
(.;lu,11 W l11t!r Sulu llo 1.., hu. 10 1 ) Wdll:1 Cu11~v 1v,1!1v11 Pl,111
Ci t, o f E ng lo w ooci
19
•
•
•
•
•
•
imp lemenlalion This gives !he Ci l y an idea of !he an Uc ipa led waler savings and
esl1111a led reveIIJe unpacls art er full 11nplemen tat1on.
The cos t per 1,000 gallons of waler saved is found by divi di ng the 101al cos! by the tota l
water savings for the entire ten-year penod . The measures and programs are then
ranked by cos t pe r 1,000 gallon s saved Th is rark ing hel ps to determine wt1ich
measures will be more ettec1 1ve and to suggest a useful order of implementat ion
Clea r W ater Sol uons Inc.
c,ry o f Englewood
20 13 W;Hor Co 11se rv at1o n Pl an
JO
..... t /,o•Ml,U ,·• •,
r -~n;;-;;7-,,!_..,, .• , , .,,,..,
•
.... -\ I ·~:=:~:~ ·--=~~. ,.,_, .. u,,..,, .. ~C,I
c..1 .. ..
..... 0 1>1 .._., ...... _ -
c..1 ,,.,., u,._,,•,
~ r ff
7 -I -,,.-I " -,
H IIOO>
•-•·u,..;-.
, .. ,.(WGt
... ,_ .... , ... ,,
1 ... 1.11.,.»1-•
" 0
•. -::: ~,1111,J_
0
; ."M+-1-..--+-,~,~--t+-~_~-_-'-''~:_:_~~~. ~~~~, :~:·+-_~,,~,~, ~>--~·:=~ . ~,
-_-;;';-+-~---,c-'-'--~·~",.~=--~->--..,
1 ·:~ 11 ,-,~ ·::: I ,
,. _L
•" ., ' ,. , I •• ••• , ... , ,. ,-., •
II n,t-• .IOO l"!l,.-.1·,•11 r1• • hrJPt<t 1.•r 1•
,t ' ._ ~ •• • • I • •• • ' ••
'"''"· • •• l•t:•• ••• • '•• ,-•• • •-~
•· •·•• 0 f\lrO, l,H'•••••·•.,,.. a
lo •• • • r• •• • • ' • • -•~ I •~ • ••
' ... ,.,,.., ,,._ ••••· I" ,,_, • ",.. r,. I"'~ ',-, ,.,,,, • ••
•
•
•
•
Comparison of Be nefits and Cost s
r he resul ting ra nk of measures by c os1-be 11 efil 1s show n 1n Table 6.2 belo"' The cost
per 1,000 ga ll ons saved rang e s Iron-SU UU to S 1 U /U I he measures a re ra n kec fa irly
eve nl y lliroug holll the five categories For the SO 00 p er I 000 gallon saved measu res .
we d id not consider the co sts to l11e Ci ty, ;is the City w ill c 11 1,n u e the e ""' sures
rega rdles s of cost
Th e rn nk,ngs ar a re u lt of the ratio o f cos t. 1n clud1 ng lost reve nu e. 10 wa ter savings
For instance. bil ling software u og rades help Engl ew ood sav e a lair amount o f wa ter
Howe ve r. the cost re lat ive 10 tre wa te · sav1 nqs 1s hiq h , so I ranks lower than one n11 qht
ex pect Th is 1s on ly a cos t pe r wa te r saved ra nking The re are othe r fac tors 10
consider wh ich will be acco•n hshed 1n a second screeni ng
Table 6 .2 -Cost-Benefit Ran king
Rank Conservation Measures and Proarams
1 I Water Mete r Renlacement Proa ram
2 Recvcl lng WTP filter Backwash
3 Res iden tial water audits
d En•lewood Meler Ass istan ce Program (EMAP )
s Leak Oe1ect 1on & Re na 11
6 Ed uca ti ona l Kits
7 Gene ra l Fv,1lu,1t 1on of Po licies t hat [ncour,iae W ate r S<1v nws
8 Co mmercia l & Indu stria l wate, aud 1h
9 Onlin e AcceS!i. to Wa ter Bill and His tory
10 Water Waste Ordinance
1: Water Ra tes t hat [ncour,w e Wa ter Sa vin gs -I ] School Education P10oram IK -12 Education I
ll Public Educa t ion • New slette r, Bill Stu ff er'J , Web'i 1t e
14 D1~tribut e n l rriPa t,o n Sc hedulln~ m Wa te , 81 11
I l S Billin• So ftware Uo•rades
Evaluation Criteria
Aft er each of the co n serva tion measures and p rog rams were r.anked by cost rer 1.000
gallons save d, as shown 1n Table 6 .2 . the nex t ste p was to se lect conserva tion
measu res and programs for 1rnp lem entallon T he c ntena used for selec tion are as
follo w s
Slaff l ime
F1nanc1al 1mp1 1cat 1ons
J Po ht1cal ram ,i 1ca ttons
Cle a, Watl:!r S olu11 o n!. Int..
Ctt} o f Enq h~woori
201 3 Waler Co nse,vJllon Plan
32
Se lec ted C o nservat ion M easu res a n d Programs
l t1P c;p c onc1 Sf:re nu 1q wa s a c.cc,m plls11 ed oy eva lua tm g ea c t1 m easlirem ro orarn ba ell
Pf l h P s1..1t'ernnt1 , r l t:fllci i ll11 E 11q t-lA-WU ~ uvt:H d ll yuat fur t11 ,s W at r Cui er ,atluri r 1a,
A -. ,n~n t1nre d 111 . v1ou ly fu rthe r rl k 11\ Of'! the c ons crv;J t1011 nwns Jres ond ~rn4rar11f
l tn ... n ", th, ... fw1c1 ,;c !Pr t on are foL,N' 1 Appendix i '
ve •1 Il1 uutJ I II Ie EM4.P 1·1 d~11re w.-1!--t ,ul tl1t-h1y l 1es t ran~ed inem,,u'e 111 !hf' uJ-.,t
b enefit analysis , E oglewooc wou ld l1'<c 10 make th is pro9ra111 ;:, to p p•Iori Iy The C ity
NOuld 11~ e to e>'p and l1 po n th eir cu rr ent pr og ra n, by orov1d ng '1 0 10 1 no n1P tPrc; ;i· nn
r.MI 10 Ih e cuslnmPr a r,,r1 her Incen11v fo r 01e 1er repla cement Tim C 1Iy hopes 10
s1 ur11 f1c a 11 Uy 111 <.re ct se t/1 p 111e t~1 t o1 1\le1~Iu11 'die fo r t11e tr •1on-rreterecl r.1 Jstorners
S mgle -r am it y 5''', -98 2 I\F
M u lli -Fa111 1ly 5% 580 I\F
Commerci al 2 "-'o 260 A F
lnrt uc.lnal '/ s •),,.. -114 4.~
• M un1c1 pa l O 5•1, -1 1 J AF
• N o n -f,/,~\P.reC C u stomers 15 % -2.731 AF
• Unacco ur:i•~o -fo r Losses 8 ~~ -648 Ar w f saving s)
•
T t1e s e le c ted co11 s~rva t1 n rn easu r8 s/µruq10111 !:, a r1U d~~ut.1 dl~ll v,,:att:, sa .·qgs were •
a rranged w 1th 1n the ta--ge ted customer ca tegones to n,ore eas1IJ com pa re the
:::i nt1c ipated s,::v ings to the o ng1na l goals So me of the measures con tribute sa vings to
""'"' l h Rn onA r-.a IAgory Table 6.3 shows //1e wa ter savin gs fo r Ihe selecled 111 eas 11 res
~u b 10Ialed for eac h ~a,eqor,
T.1ble 6 .3 t;ombined W ater s~vings of Solect ed Co n s erva1ion Me.isures and Programs
Conservation Measlff'es and Proanms
System loues
Bilh na Software Upttrade s
Recvcll nR WTP Fil te r Backwash
t ilk D P lt!t1 t(Jrl & Ri.: pctll
Cl <•Jr Water Solut re,ro, he
f I 1 ,,f •\glc w r.iu<.l
I
i Subto tal -MG
s\cre-Feet
hti matcd An nu al
Water Savings
afte rfull
lmplement;1tion
(MG )
S.8
23.0
ll C
~, 8
t •,Q
Estimated Total
Wat er Savings
over Plann i ng
Period
(MG)
28,8
230,3
230 l
089 4
/,<;0 )
•
•
•
•
Est i m ate d An nual Est imat ed Tot al
W ater Savi nes W at er ScN i ngs
Conservat ion Measure s and Program s aft e r full ove r Pl ann i ng
l mple me nt ;Uion Period
(MG) (MG)
Non-Mete 1-e d Customer -M e ter Re olace ment and EMAP
W.1t ti r M et Pr Re p l;ice me nt 5.1 278 .9
Ene l ewo od Met er Assis t •nce Prooram I EMA P) 10 .1 557 .B
Wat e r Was t e Ordina nce l.5 14 .8
Subtotal . MG 16 7 a,1,
' Acre-Fee t 5 1 2,613
Slnalo-Famllv
Wa t er Was t e Ord i nance 1.6 16 .0
Wat er Rat es th at Encou rage W at e r s.1v 11,gs ___ 12 3 128 0
~choo l t ducat 1on !d 32.0
[du ca t ,o nt1 I K1b 3 2 (;4 ,
Public Educ.1 t1 o n 6.4 64 0
Online Acc C!.S to Water 81I1,rn d l-l 1~t o ry 64 64 0
0 1s tr1bute ET l rn~.i l ,on Sc hed u ling 1n W ;i.tc:r Btll 3 2 32 0
Res ide nt ial W at er Audi t s 0 08 24 .0
5u bt o rof • M G Jb y 4 )4 '.,
' Acre -Fe et 1 1 l 1,303
Multl•Familv
Wat e r Wast e Orct inance 0 ,9 _J!,L __
Wol t e r Ra t e s th.t t Fn cou r,"IRe W ~t e r sa vinRS )6 75 6
Schoo l Ed uca t io n 0 .9 9.5
t:duca 11ona1 Kit s 2 0 1 111
Pu b li c Ed u ca t ion J.8 37 .R
Io nl 1nc Acces s to Wa t e r Bill an d His t o ry l R l/ R
D1 st ri b u1e CT lrrrn.a t 1on Sch edu lmg 111 W atc , 81 11 1.9 18 .9
IKes u1en t 1a1 W ate r Au C1 1H 0 .39 124 ,0
Suototor • M G 2 1 3 424 I
Acr e-Feet 65 l 302
Commerc ial
Wa t e r Wast e Ordin an ce 0.8 8.5
Wa t e r Rat e \ that Enc our;i~e W alti r !i av 111 ~s 6 8 67 1
l'u b li c (ducat 1a n 3.0 33R
On l 111f' flr r f'V, to W,1t Pr Kil l ;rnri H1 '\IOrv 3 I. B B
0 1!i t r1flull' ET l mgat ion Sch c tlultng 111 W,111 ·r Bd1 I 7 --:~;-Co mmcrrral and l nd m tnal Wat er Aud it s 0 ./
Subtutul · M G 16 7 19 7 0
Acr e-Feet 51 GO<
In d ust ria l
Wat e r Wa st e Urd Inance 0 ,4 3.9 -. ! W,1te 1 Rii t es t ha t Enco11r ;1 ge W atrr savrnc :i
Online ,~cccss t o Wa t e r 8111 and His t ory
Co m .,,c•c.1,11 :H'd ln d u'..t r1:i l W,ltc r Audit '..
Cle,41 W ~ttir Soh111 ons In
Ct !/ o ' EnqlPwcod
Sub to ral · MG
Acr e-Feet
3 ! 31 I
l.b I l ~ b
1; I 60 I
F, I Il l
19 I 3,10
2013 W:-tt c r Consc rva1 1on ~ :'In
Estimated Annual Estimated To tal
Water Savings Water Savi ngs
Con SI! rvatlon Measures and Pro1rams after full over Planning
lmplement~tlon Pe riod
(MG) (MGI
IMun,a-
f v al u :it 1o n o f Poh c,es t o F1 toll rage Wat e r S:1v1 11g~ 0,04 0.37
Subtotal . MG "·"" n .11
Acre-Fret 0 11 I 13
Grand Total -/MG} 150 2,498
Acr~-Fttt 459 7,665
Grand Toto/ Savings from EJ<ist/ng Measures (Acre-Fttl/ 164 3,651
T hese savings w ere com p ared 10 the o ng,nal goa ls se t 111 Ch&ptcr 4 As mentioned
e a rli er. w~te r c.on se rvnllon gonl c;P.tl1 ng 1s rm 1I P.rnl 1vP. pmc.e ss . o r ig 1nr1 I ori ls ;::trp
e~tc1 1J lis11 eu , cu11servc1t 1011 rne<1sw es are ev aluated ard selectea based o app rop ri ate
n tena , an d the esu lt ng wa te r savings are com pared to the ong ,na l goal In this case
tne resu lti ng w ate r s av,ng re close 10 the ori ginal goa ls
Table 6.4 cm11 par es i1 1e dn t,cipated wa ter ,av nqs frorn the selected mea su res w1i11 tt1e
or g,n al goals and th en ad1usts the wa ter-sa vi ng goa ls for thi s plan
Table 6 ,4 -Water Co nservation Goals Co mparison
Total
~rvjetted
W.a.carUw
Water Use CatelOrits: (ZD1J lo Mil)
'',,nQl e ra11 ,t v
M 11f 1 r,un, v
~''~~
,n 1u~1t 1;il
~•.'~
N o n M e1e1ell (u ~IUlllt!r ;
M ""IP • H;•;1 t ~, l'"''llP' I 111d
I MAP
I ln .:1 r n 11ri1 Pr1 t ri r l n \,:,"',:,
H ,i r ·r>n11, 'JY.,)
I 01 d l IA1t t f'r l'rt.OuCI 0 11
t,111· l)p,n u d Hr•(l u:•10•
lo' ill 1>pr1 p n1 K•' dw I 0"
c ,..,,u W.it •1 u lu t ,on !, !11~
C 1ry o l En g lew o d
(AF)
t 9,M 1
11,602
lU,:18 7
4 /IF
J)', --
1L!07
~) 8 !tJ
7{1 f.,77
fleductlon GNfs
1a<11t .. n1,.
Hori1on
(%) (AF)
rn" qRJ
~OIi, '>80
,l '.,,. 21,0
!.._ 14 "~
l'CI'<, I }lll
B O> I ,,..
-:
S Cl
'
TCIIOIW ... r
Sowtnplrvm Adjus,_d llod-on
Solfflod ........ Goal• for ,..,"hit: -... Aodoctlon Hortlon
(AF) (%) (%1 (AF I
lli1\ r, n<>:: f;'°)~ 1 ;n
1 ,11 112'>, 11(/'i 1,276
b(\1 'M?\ ; ,,, 571
MO '1'1, 7 114
-I
~
0 \4 _ -22~, I
.l blJ 111111., J 1 4"', :',blJ
}f,1Jl f,," ::I ,~ ("1 f
•,...,r, ' ~: 1
I \· 1'1'
201 3 W al er Conservi'l ton Pl an
•
•
•
•
•
•
Over the ten -year pla nning period , the selected m easu re s/programs provid e an overa ll
estimated water sa vings of 7,665 acre-feet This is righer than the ini tia l water savInqs
goal s set in Chapter 4 . The N on-Metered Customer catego ry goa l was adIuste d down
to 14.4 percent from the 1nit1al goa l of 15 pe rcent, to reflect the estima ted sav in gs from
th e selected Non-Mete red Cus tomer program Goal s fo r all other categories, wi th the
excep ti on ol th e M uni ci pa l ca te gory , we re ad Justed up from the origina l Cit y goals . The
ad1us ed goal s reflect th e goals believed to be obtainable by City staff
.After th e goals were adjus ted to better re flect the ex pected water savi ng s, the estimated
water use redu ction is 6 , 72 acre-fe et or ten perce nt. Therefo re , Engl ewood will target
a reduct ion in its wa te, us e by ten percen t ove r the nex: ten ye .ar s oeca 1J SP. of
implementation of this pla n
Cle ,1, W ator So luti o ns, Inc
Ci ty o r Eng le w ood
2 01 J Water Conservation Pl a11
36
C H APTE R INT G RATE RESO UR CES ANO M ODIFY
FO RE C A STS
Eng lewood operates 111 111an11 1 to rndke tile, 10s1 effi L1ent ._15 u It~ rt!suun . .;es
[ach year a b,,dget IS ca refully developed w ith !he given funding and personnel
va ilabt e Whi le water conservation ha s been an effort lhat has be n gradual ly
ncorporated , 1m pl emen 1aI 1on of lhe measures and programs selecled in lh1s pla11
.vi ii require reeval uation of staff resources an d pursuit of add1t o al funding In 1he
form of grants
Implementatio n Sc hedule
Water sa, ngs result ing fr om 1mpl crnenl at1on of 1h1 s Waler Co nserva 11on P lan w,l i
occur graduall y as the City has th e resou rces to implement each se lected
•neasurc and program and the water users res pono 10 1ha t 1mp lemenlat 10n
G rant availabili ty w ,11 be crucial in the 1Im ing of 1P1plemen1a t1or .
The following lable p roposes a schedule of Implemen ta 11on Fo r 1ll us tr at 1ve
µurpu ses. a tliree-ye,ir scl1 ec.J ule lias 1Jee 11 µruposec.J <111c should be Irite rpre l ec.J
tha l Y ear 1 is lhe Ci ty's fir sl prio ri ty o f proIects followed by Yea r 2 a nd t11en Year
3 and •M Ii not be within three yea rs ex act ly . T he pro posed ,mplemenl at1on of !h is
W ote r Cons c r,ation Pla n will occ ur a s the necessary re so urce~ become
availa bl e
This 1able does nol include exislI ng measures that are alreaJv Implemenled and
re not s hedu led for expans ion and imp rovements I ho ~G measures include
recycling WTP filler backwa sh and b1 l1111 g soflware llpgrades The C11y will
co nlinue lhese p rograms ;is Is However l he (;11y would like 10 expand upon
EMAP wate r waste o rdinances and ll1 e school educa lion nrogram. so lhese
~,easures are included in the, 1111plemen 1at1on schedule
Cl ear W,1H.•r SO IUIIO'I', Int: 2013 W3UH C o 11serv,1t1011 Plan
Ci ty o f Englowood
•
•
•
•
•
•
l,1i,1, 1 , Cit y of Cng1 ,.,,ou ow 11 1 ■, Co 11 ,er w,11 011 r-1,,, tm ple,ieri1allor, Se h e Ou le
Mtu ure/Pro1,,m
vtAR l llSl PRIOfUTYl
Vf /Ur, MD,'llfft!Ollct P'rogromt ~ewOGd M~t ef ~,i1,1.a .. t ~ .,,~v •m IE .. IAf'I
r ......... r •• j '" ·" ~,• Pc,t, , ... TtlJ I f .. ,,,,,, .. W J h ~
.ll,rg11/o1 0,~ S1011dardi ,.,09r om ~,. •J I
lfl'0"'4!ori,,Src,/'ldo r dProoram1
f tl11m1lonol Ptogrtlffll
, 1• ,\',1hH ",
t, II-11,..,
lmpltmentatlon Consld l!l rellon,
"
11p hll~I ·q,1 tn nt1pl Pr11 fu 1 t tll f' <..:O'lS •r.Ja lor pl n 1c;:. S2':f 1 hl':i 1111 1s •1qurf-l ,n"llld '"'"'
u~t~ fu, lt e "" 101 v di uf uµ~rdtvn) The 1mule me r~t" t1or I ~ul t' NIii li e rnu'>t
,Mfe(ted oy a va1,c1bl e staff t,n ' c1 ncl furn.ling W n1 lt! t111s s\ t1ed ult=> ma , oe optirm st1c lf'l P
. oal 1s to all o N t11 for res arci,nq and ot~101ng rant!, 1 , rl f)ve lc1 1 ~ound .)ro n,.., fo r
,1 1,1 qher pro bab 1l•ty :"'If s1 1cr ess
ii o;~o 1 • b no teo th~1t tr 11 ,plem nta1 1or c.os ~ inc.Jud 0•.1 H 1..ubt to 111 p ~rnent u,e
writ i:ir r n . erva lt on ·neasure 1prog ran1 tmcl staff t,m aa~oc1;-1tpd w1I the 1m pl e 1nenla1101
;and 1s not necessar ly rep r€esen1;a1 1ve of the capital ou lla1 req uire11en1 Plea5e ref er 10
Ap pe ndi x A tor '1P ~et;=ulec1 nrPrtkclown nf r oc;,t , fnr Petch -,,p;::i ,;wpin rngr;:t n
Modified Demand Forecast and Benefits of Conservation
l\~ r.1cn t1 rna:d prc:•.mu sl7· 1r lc tJ I ~ro 1e cted a n-1 ·.:i 1 ·:va: rd ·r.-•Jr c {•::1:hot.1 'N3 te:
co nservation ) !or Englewood 1s es ti mated at 6,48< acre !eel fhe c1rt1 c1pa te d annual
savings , after fu ll 1mplemen1at ,o n 1s app ro<ima te y 460 acre feet reduc ing l ~e arnL1ol
d mond to 6,024 ac re fee t on nuol ly
Benefits of Water Conservation
Because Engl ewood has su f 1c1ent water supply an d 1,ea trnent pa c1l y, this planning
effort wi ll not delay any future improvem ent pro1ec ls or pJI off wa ler supply acquis1t 1on
•
Howeve r , Englcwooc 1s s1,11 commi tted 10 cons erving heir wate' supply or :he benefit of •
their cu s lon,Pr and tt1e tiroacler region
! h·,H W,1\1.•1 Sul 11:1<1:1~ In,
C'1 I \ ,,f f-nt)ll-'NIV>tl
,0 1 ) W<'l l t'I Cu11<,t-'!ViH1u 11 D !an •
•
•
•
CHAPTER 8 -PLAN O F IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING
T he scheelule for 11 npl eni erna ti o11 rs pre ented 11 1 Table 7.1 111 Chapter 7 . The
process fo r Im plem enting the plan and monitor ng rts success is outtrnecl in th rs
crapter
Publ ic Part icipation
On e of cwce·s requi re ments for a State-approved Wa ter Ca 11 se rva tlo11 Plan Is
l'J sa lrc 1I pub tr c co m, ent s on tne draft pl;;n for not less than a 60-day perrod
ui,less oth erwi se speci fied by C it y po lrcy
T hr•i ug h thrs wa ter conserv ation ptan nrng process , :he pu btrc wa s notified and
grv en 60 days to comment. Appendix B incl udes affida vi ts from the local
news paper and E rglewood 's Ci tize n Newsl etter tna t leg al na11c e wa s publi shed
The plan was avai lable on Englewood 's webs ite an d at th e Utiliti es De part ment
for review W nl1 Ar r.nmmeni s nna responsP.S to th os e r.o mm P.n ts are included in
Appendix C
Moni toring and Evaluation
Moni torrng th g SllCC ess of Ihrs W ,iter Conserva tron Plan incl udes mea su rin g
wa ter use as well as money s pent on th e selected co nserv,itio n mea s ure s and
prog ram s Customer c lass water use w ill be monitored fo r pro gram s such as a
wa ter rate study. Table 8.1 pre sents the in formation th at writ be track ed for each
measure proposed by th e City Mora s peci fi c monitorrn g in formatron wrll be
devel oped as each meas ure ,s 1mplemente~.
Many of !lie cos ts eva lua ted In the cos t-benefit ana lysis include an nual costs for
follow up Th is will a leN staff to speci fi rnlly set asid e time to mo nitor and
eva luate the succ es s of th e conserva tion meas ures an d pro grams . Expendi tures
for co nserva tion wrll be documented by staff anu re aorted ta City Co uncil o n a
regu lar basis . This wi ll be va luable inform ation rn evalu ating the cost-benefi t ratio
and to valida te th e success of im pl ementing th e sele cted conse rv ati on measures
a nd p rogr,-J ms ~mce th e prog rams will be rmpternen ted rn ph ases , there w,11 be
time to eva luate and es tablr sh the app roprra le me thod to mo nitor succ ess of
e?c h prog rnm and me,isu rP
Plan Update s and Rev i~ions
The required sc hedu le lo r uadat1n£ tho Wate r Conser,at1on Plan Is sev n yea rs
The progre sz towa rds ach,evmg tt1e wot er savings goals w,H be rnonr tored or a ,,
a nnua l bas ,s by Englewood The Crty m"y choose to upda te thi c ~Ian prr or to
seven years 1f U"1 p erientat1 on and actu ~ ..va te r savings devi ate too m uch from
I 1e se pru1ec1.0 11s T1 11s dev 1at un may t,~ 1.-tJ sed IJ y several fac tors In .t ud111g
• Cle ar Wat er So lution ~. Inc
C ny of Englewoo d
,W 1 J W.iter Conservati on Pl an
lfH~~, trian an 1c nrn e<t ~c ruc1pa '°' dnrt I e in b1hty l 1m;>1e•n '=nt the pla ,'u tv i.lck of
5la f1 a va1lab1l 1t or rur-mg
Plan Adopt ion and Approval
Aft ,. thP pubhc r.0 11111 eni pPn or1 U1 ror11r1e nt wer e irt. orpnrntPl1 111 10 1he plnn l t1P
nglewood Cl!y Council orma1 ;~ adopt d tne plan pr,or 10 subm 11a1 :o CWC B IOI 11 a l
a p orov;,I Tile resulul!o r, is ;,11;,c eu d S Append ix D l111µle111en l at,o wi ll be gin after
CW C B approval 1s received It ,s only after fina l CWCB app ro val lt>a l E nglewood will b
e 191b le fo r a wat 0 r-effl c 1enc) g ran l l11ro .1gh CW CB for p1nn 1mplw11c tat,on
C le~, W ,H o r Sulut1011s It r
' 11\' 0 1 nq /ewootl
20 1 ~ Wa tu, Cons e rv a11on P l.:1 n
Jl
•
•
•
•
l-'DIII !I 1 -Tr;ic~111g Matrh !or Monitoring Waler Conse rvation Moa,urn
f" , ...... , .. ,~1·
(~ f''O/,'Y.1 /,.'"l~•••~r• 1"1.-.\'-'"'
• ~• ~·,·.i._,.&q .. E ..
• "''<''• ,,~I ••·•·•l_t~':!':".''i!Y.~,!~ ~•
•
""••~•"'••••O·oi "•":• -·---·--· ;-,,ie, ~II •~i:'•1 .!..:~c !:'''lif W•·t • ~1. r 11
!,choo,f.:i .,ul o• r , 11.,.,,, l!(a..c:,·,.,.
• tl,lr .... ,'i)IPf O l,I OIi ~ 11 \t
.,t} l•l [n"f1•"' ,u,J
~,m:htol
~.w1 ,\/
:;,.,, .. ..,...,,
1na, .. ,d11'1J Cu 1tomt1
Cu ,lurn-, Cl •uW•I••
W•tt1 111•
,-,(♦PI\I V,..UQ<;nl1(1
lc•W•t••
PU l.lAnn~,1
r,u1,J !.l 11i..J
w .•e•lhm•-.d
:_
,--
:;-
,.,,,, ... tf' .,.,
,,1 °, ...... '1 1,, ~,, ., .
20 11 'II ,,, .. , i..o>l!'\O l \r i.t 1o n Pt,111
R FFRF NCF
,\m er ca n Vvater V\'or',,,,. l\sso I t-on, £000 Wate, Conser 1at1on Proqr m ~
Mct nua l ti.la ri ua! f Wnter Supply f"ract1 c43,;;;, M 52
f1 1 Brcnrt 1c-Gr ou p Junf' 200 6 f\l orthcr Colo•mlt f\, rm P l.:11 10, l•1d 1Vit r1L1I
L.omn1e •c,a l ana lnsu tut cna 1 1 ILi W at er :onserva 1101
I : ly n l FnglPwnn lOIJH B11ctgeI V l ,J uly 1 ~ 20 08
C ty o f Englewood Comprehensive Plan May 2002
,i. I ) anrnno
C ty o f , 14 le wuu<J M u, IILlµd l Cude , St1ct 1 11 '3 04 06G ewl I Ac pie<J 1//.,lt;• R,Hes
['fcc !:vc Ju,c Bdl!~1'"" Cycle June 2006
C ,ty o f Englewood Wntcr Su pp ly nna Do·nnn d , for Wi nd \ n p F,•n, ng Octobe r 13,
200,1
ng lewood Drou,;I1t Respons e Plan , December 2007
Harvey Economics , Water Supplies and Demands 'or Par;,c,oants ,n t·1e Nonhero
lril ey r;,ted Suµµl y Pruject. 2004
I IDR Engin eering, Inc Wa lerN\lastewater Master Plan . · 90
HOR nginecnng Inc W nter Ma ster Plan Updnted M n) ~00 5
K hen . Bo bbie . Kenney Doug Lowrey Jessica , and Gocmans Chris Fa ctors
Ii 1fluen ,ng Resid ent ,al W aler Demancl A Review a l l he L1lPraI11 re (Upoated 1~107 1
U S Environrne11IaI Pro tect ion Age11 cy, 2007 C;,ses 111 'iva te r Co •ise rv;,11 on Hc,w
,-mc,e11 r.y F'ro 9ra 11 1, Help Wate r Ut 1lit 1es s~vc Wa te r an o Avo,ct Costs
I J S [nv1ronmental r rm ection Agen .y Auyust
f'I A N GUIDE LINES Appendi, B
1990 W ATrn C ONS[R VAT IO N
f o tra l ech , ·:MC . Memora 11dum from Do ug eeley regard ing W '.er Dem nd
Pro1e c t1on s, September 8 , 200 3
'l 1rl<.ern , A my 1001 Hr1nfi 1nok r. V\1~1P.r t J~P. ;=inrl C:nnc:Prv rt tmn t--'nmP I ;tn<:5r;,r,pc;
Business Pdustn e s Fa ,rns Wa te rPl ow Press Amhers:. M i\
W a ter Conse·vat on /\ lia nce of Sou thern An,ona , 200 1 E ,aluat,on nrJ Cos t Benef I
A na lysis o1 M uni cipa l ate r Consen-a t1 on P rograms
Western Resource ,\d ,ocntcs 2006 WnIer in the Urbo n Southwest
C:tP M '11 ,ll,\f ~nli1 11n n .. hu
( 11v o l C n y lt•w 11od
•
•
•
APPENDIX A
r ., -'· J (;r'.f !,.ted'-;1 ll
Englewood M e ter Replace ment Pr<,gram • Existing Measure
,,,, 't ,., l ''lf•II ,,,,,, r,n,,
,o
, • ,, ,\,1',_,_•~•; _________________ _
t ,1,n,,.11>0 "1 nn u o1 I W o1 \f'I Ci,o ,
'U!rt,...lf'I\ \1'YHIII\ OY Pt ~lum,ng ~
I ota Cost t o W ater Pr ov1d1:>r
11
,.,,,-, -,.-,j----so-oo--,j ·•·"
rl -1mtJ • .if f'~rl ,p,1 11•, ~o ...... ,,t
.:.1, IUctl M 111 tHt ~Q.00 , •"•"
l".;','>\C><"f" ,, 11·~• "' lo'' tll/ J.' I>
·.10,,t'a, 'D• ,Jri ·J ,t•,a~l .,, ,.' ':c.o!.l\,co,
l1t•<1 ,J('(}r, .'fJ! 11, . h r J. r.t,• n• itou,
1014/10,1/,'t(JJJ•\'1 '11/
ro mmt-,: \1J ~•ll fl\ n~,.. hn'1r,ny ?r•,r,d ,~
<·l /t!,\l/t't/1.y fOIIIU\J hl'd ,1 1v Plt'r'Ht"lilti'n'
"""J.•I <;"!•" IOY•·''1)Pt' l "r'lt'fC'":J"lt'• •
,,, w·r,•,pn11f\ ,,,, ,or'I o•vf'•I 11.-0,
r.:1r /ll1)plCHJ l,Jrn ·1•1/t r t u• ~,\o UI • tlr
r t'\:Jcm,IJ,l,r\ Jf tf't' •i,Hon•1•r tcba, ·oH,
o.Jrt· rl:lt (QffJ/Ot't~•t1 '' r ,,:;,/oc,:•nr ,• •at 1•
,. t.•~n •creo ro n,• l:,.i,r, r·,rm ·i.-·u1gi> a,
<1r111m .. ttmt1•/, ~o tau\l ~·t'rn
•
•
•
•
•
•
Englewood Meter Assistance Program (E MAP) • Existing Meas ure
ht! E~MP llt ,:,m takes ;,,e-dtftr:re?Ct btirwe n \',h,11 t'ie WSIOnJ('I vays ,n, l'le no, trlll /&ff'O liJ/t' nnd what ti O CIIS /:Jmer
1 ulrl 1n 1 hr /lie metrreci ,ate 1r'KI 11,;t'•S t/1111 monl'y 10 I f>/r, p,,, lfl•• ro,;1 of 111<;fJ/hug thf' \,Mer e 'er Engle\ d woi:td '1 /,,.e to
e1oarJCJ upot1 11,e,, ,,.,ne•1t ,vog,om t,y r"ow:1 11 19 51 to ICO me ters al r,o ::-est tc tnt.• <.:USfcm t:r aS' fu rtfl<11 11ct>r1t11 e to, me1e1
replec:t'mOflt
Pt~nn1011 P~riod ~l ___ 2_01_3_10_2_0_22 __ ~
, '1H 1n Pl~nn1ng p,,nod l)
,,o~nm\t-1'1!rhL __ 10
Esttmmcd W.it c, Sovma '>
htim <1 U!II Annuli W .tl\'• S.iv ln g<. __ ~l~O __ fl.1C,,.i
r \llm ;ued S;i~lnN\ OYPf Ptannlri1 fl &1'od ss ,.3 1\11,.i
(OH l
Total Cost to Water Provider
M~teri-i l,Cou s
llnit Ct.11 1 S500.00 / in1t
ll urnbt:: of Pa1 t1c,0,1n1,'-----'-'00=/ IC l
,im'lu.tl •,,ar .. 0;1 \ SS0,000 00 /,,q
_I
',J lt"I
Cn r;,e woor1t11n JOV t'C on O\lt'tage 11 8
~•IG/yror f:,r O'I ll<ft•rogt• of f.l/ to,r./v~o,
from .1006 JO: J (o ir.11,n"s m lt' of a bout
IOJ,.J 11 gal/tup/)eot}, The onnuol iovmg\
rt/ltrr tn t rtp'octm<'rl r of JOO mtrtrs
fi.t,mated5ov n gi o vl!, Plo nnmg Pt riod 11,
c11lcula ll!dtJy compound 11y 1f1t• t•~r,t1 tO fl'd
ut1rua1 watc• sovm9) r,c, tl•t• ru ral •11,ri b c-,
of oor rir,t1~'l r1 (01 Pach ..,,v,••1 w•a r
rcu th,, pr09,am Fnf)/c ..,.o,:id would pov
1h1• co~, 10 ,,mlori rhr m,·tl.'1 A1 "''rfl rh ,-
Mf'tf'r Rep·actmt-·H r ,ogrom, tuba, coils
a,e not CCl'll•der ed l h1s prct}'nm 11
unt1c1PQ l td ro wc,ea•e rnt' r11m be1 of
'11 t''t'f lOMtl)'l'II fU u rurul r.J{ l l(}+l SC
mc:l'n rci=1octdJrca, co.-nb,nrC w,·h 01t•
Mrtr r ~;,r,.'orr-ml'1 / rro9ffJ m
num-ir~ Anno-i i Coit SSO,O(l).00 /\r.11
h ti111,11ed l o t.ti CO!l l o\·e r Pt;,11mnK Pe,iod lndudin, Srl vu SS00,000.00
Coit pt!I 1000 G•llon\ S<1ved S0.90
Leak Detection and Repair Program
• •11 .. , ... l/'• ~, 1,11 f 11' ,.,,,,, •J,tl< r,, •111 r'♦~ ,t,,,., j,(lr I I' ,l flmr/ part•, t.,Jtl ... 11/Mll/ !'I'"'" "'~i),4(
'! ' .. ~ ,,,. ,0
"• ,;, m, ''•')', .. "¥{ _____ ._, -~"'•,tr•
J.(J!I
2,303
2],030
1l
Pf'noj w,th >u l ><IVl'l,!\~-=~-~
£.n imr11ed Annual Wa l er ~1'1 11ln 11\ __ ~--
l stlm:ned ~av1 n1 ~ over 1•1an nlng 1•erlod __ HO
Tot al Cost to W a t er Provider
1.aoo, co,-,.,
...,., ,·
"'; ...,,,,,
5 109 )62_ 00 f •,I!
cu,,tm w~1e II leu -.uae 1/o, ,.,r,. )
n l•fl"Ott' I at 9't
f h cest1111ntt,lt11iJdat1/,,,,(wi1IUJur
)UVlfl!J)} L'quuh tlw µ1u/t'lktl ,<JI/It I l~UIJC.
plu!, 9-;
-v, r~)
''tt C,ry muy 1•H1 uutt uµµ,o ~ "uld~ 50"-
of theu .ws tem (wait' mainsJ e~·erv 5
rc.•wi Cos r c.·H1r11o ll' /01 on our:.,d1'
ron whonr ro p!!rforrri elt!crmn,r troll
l ll'tt'<fl.0(1 II S/l }'J ,..,., /t><>! ffll'tt'/Otr 0
•
165 7 m,lt' )yJ!em o/ i)l1Jt'11 •t' WOtfld total •
_;10936 /(¥)
ht1mate d Ann ual Cost S 109,162 .00 1•,.-•,1 1
[,t lrllillCd 101;11 Co\! OVf'I Pl;mnillK Period l11cl udln,: Se t u p~
(a~t p.-, 1000 Ga ll on , Sl'!lvPd S0.95
•
•
•
•
B/1/lnQ Software Upgrades • Ex isting Measure
Suh,v,m: uuy1 rttie/> 0/11.J w w,,lt:' 1.11a111i.le1 lu v tm,,l,,iy d 11,} .. ,,,,ly rull1r1-.,t: \\,1/t:f 11.'Hl!/t' tJ ''" ,11 1iJ 11:1 1t1yll1J r ll,t/J l tl /l1tn t.11~tomt'1~.
ne' nq cu.tomors ,., ,mn,10, //1 01· w.i/C't u~:,go ,,rid con cvr::1t,011 Soff\.,:J t<' u pgmde,; ~ .. ,,., s r,,lf to ,dcritr'y ::ystC'm r,rot,Jcm:;
f,11 1/tv 11 ('/f'I c; ,ltld rl1.t:flnr1,uc;II t1('f,.,,•f'~n ,.,,t:l nm.-, (',lfPQflllf'!~ T'1,=o City 11pgrn<fpc; ti f}/1 J/hflg .<;y~IP /11 ('\, .. .,. th•f'f> tn l 1vP :,,P:tr<;
Cosr::.
Ptanr1n ,, Pcnod ~l ___ l_O~l3_1o_lO_l_! --~
\t'.tl\ 111Ptann,n ~Per1od ~----•o ____ ~
~ro~r 1m ~""l\t h S ~••cl1\
h11mi11ed Annu.>1 W;n e , ~av lngs ---'-'·-'-'--MG ,~,
Eulm11 tcd Sav,na~ ovN Plan ning Per iod 18,8 MC,
r\r:rr~
Cu11 -.~11 t s,Ht'UI lcCll UIJ ~/lu» re.cc I>
u r,morcc or 9"" 5oftworc uogrodc , Ot l!
t')flmOll'd to ·educe OOf)Olent lo.sSt\ lho r
cuu r dut 10 0,11111g .svst em e,ro,s by c
quarrt>r of oeraw
'11:: t'H11 1.,,rcJ µ,01 /v<t10,1 (,v,rnuur
;ovin~,J {qi,ch tnl' p•o1rr1,d wa rttr U\0(11.'
olu l9'lfi
Total Cost to Water Provider
A nfluil l MM edal\ CO\h
One Tim, L•bo, and ~aterl al Com
S 11 .000.00 y(!jf
A1111 tmlrram•t•fl(I II Cc.'CO\I I) 10" of
u11r1,ode /1•t 1011 }0 /J u:m r(J(lt!/r, wm
app,o ,,,ror~o(y SJ !0000
E\ti'l1A led AnnuA I Cn\l SJOR ,000.00 t,r,1
[~tlmilll"d Totill (no 0\/PI Pl~nn ,ng P•rlnd IMludlng "•'•UP ~,011 ,non 00
Cost per 1000 Gotllons Sa\il'td S 10.70
Recycling wrP FIite r 8ackwa>h • E•i>t ing Measure
, I/ I • • '"' "•' l'' • llf I .. •
.-11, ·I 1013 ,o 2021
·• ll _l'-"0-----, r:::== 10
/l'l9'c .. i;c,I ;1,morc tt'1:1"' ,,,,,,,.,,,,
fq 11 ,,1t,C1 il.nnui\l W ;11,r S;,w 1n111. ___ ll_O_ rtC'Olt"O NO l (t r1Yycl,"1
l \tlll\,l lCtl >f!\'II IK\ over l>l<1IUU III\ l,lflP!Od ltO.j
Tt11 ~I (n,;;t t o W<1tt•r Prnvlr!M
'lfl11C-,-1 1 IOOO J:" 1
/1,·n·,, r I !•~•l it II ,,I ,~----~0 .,yt•,\
Arl!llJ II Pl/ l't' SU ()(I \•(•,l
f olrnt,-d Annua l Co 1.t 50 00 ·v ,l r
ht1111.:1cd l 1,1111 1 Co\t o,e, r1 ,n-,ing re-r od Includi ng Se t up ___ 10_00_
Cost per l000 G11 ll on1 Snved SO 00
•
•
•
•
General Evaluat ion of Polle/es rhar Encour,ge Water Savings
r,, f ,,, ',\ ·111/.I 1,~r ,, 1•\flltr1•r r11l,t1r, th"' ... ,au/fl Pr1 , ,,m aru• M,m,r,onl \\/H t•, {1t111•111i
Plann 1n ,: r,.11od j._ __ -'1"'0~ll~•~• "20"'2~1 --~
1,,.,,\ 1n Pl,r,11 ,11 .; Pr11o d,-_____ 10 ____ ---,
Yl()!(I .I IT! l +'fl Hltl 10 ',"'<I I\
fu /mntnf
Av1111t1~ Wil\i!r Uie Annuol wort,
MG So11lngi
Cu~tomer Ccnegory vollo,ufl,
Mvnici ptl lGJ1.t , 'J
h l lm ollf'd Anm..s;t l W111r1 !t•~l nR \ 0 .0)7 MCi ,•1
l:•!:~•il li!d S,1v 1111(\ ovP r Pl,1 n11ln g Prtlud O 167 Mt,
Total (o \l 10 W.a t er Pr ovider
One Tim, l i'bor ;mrl M,11,d;d (0\h
on~ t~~:~.~:t :~:a~~C~~~:1----s-,""~"'::",
O,u, l ,n', l •bor/l,l1kr i.1l(O\I ____ S_1S_0_.OO_
rln) m1•1 w1,,· u//•, 1, vnly t h t' MumuuL·I
~O fCQOT\ A~~Ulllt' 0 ( IHt.'f VU /1\fr'
•1•duc l10" of U l 5 of p,a,,>rt,d CJ'lnuol
w c1tl.'IU)f'
hrir1mrr1 c,nr• 11m1• Haff rnit~ /{)I \WI( ro
't'f'ld UIIPI0 1 tnt 11 f••I ► J S noun flt
.,~ JW/r-011, ro t·valur.r,-H,,rt-11f oolic,e~
w 1f/'11fl fiit'(l v
so .oo /'V(',lf
F\l1m;+tf'rl fnO I (rH I OYtlf Pt ,rnfll nll p,.,!0!1 lndu rt ln1 St"l •uri ___ S_1_"1_M_
Co~t ptr 1000 G;illom !.aved S.l 05
Wa ter Wa ste Ordinance • E,lsrlng Measur~
,[ l Oll lu 2022
~ .. , _____ ,:..:• ____ _
•'''------''-----'
, r ""'' ,1 l\ ul , ,.,,_ '.'JI..
\ ii! ,.,,.N
Non Me1,mi Cu\lomen lal calttOrtH)
Avtt ,iKt All'lllill
W,1 te, UU! j MG/vr)
64-0
l7I
m
IS!
59)
"
),,, ,,.,w \1,.11 1 11>01 ~c,~1•,,~---'-'SSOO=.OU"II
l'I, l,r,, M ,11,•u.11, o I L. ___ ,::SOc,,00::,_
tt·•· 1 'I .. 1 ~nr>ilM ,1,,, 1,,1, ,.,1 ___ .,_ss,,,oo,c,OOee
EJl1noo110 l\nn11ol
worr,So11 ln Q1
MGl'Jlr
11
, .. ,.,
,,,
M' ,.,,
f~,,, t,-u,,..rt' Jf/• '' 0 \U\h n1,.
.!.1)()1,• .. ,,, .,.,.,,,,,.,,.j"',it•,
AI J"•,ll'O'll•h•1,1·i,,
f•f mnf,.t1 ~,.. r'f, 1,-/r, ,111/n• >',1'/ •
\Ut 11!/\ll,IU,(U lll•t,/,'/j' /0 /U "-'I\ UI
~t() rD /hr,,,1, f(I ,.11,' 1(1'r ,,.,,,.,., pol,r i>\
w lh,l'lfll,•L•f r
rri, nnnunlrP111>,1,i,•/tttC W 'H i '\fl"lllll'rl
/.o,r Jw1cu,,,,,1.,, 1,tv-U1.-1/r,, o-'/Crf,
11• rrrrr ,~
/·./lrno· .. ull'•• .. ·• ...... IIIHl'l"'lll•11• ""
(IJ'lf'nl f Off'~ ...,,//1N .ha1•;Jf'f'II m,
JMlf"1,ruor"•,1t1
I '"''•h-tl \,, '•''I*'•' ,,..,,11.1,,., 11,w,,.,,t ,t,,,, \'Ill • \ 1,ot·,1 '4,,11.'' IJM Ill/ t •·.11
1.lff,1!,·dl,,,.,,11, ,\1"h,,IJ,,.,. 1,, A\I .'1 11• ••"'1 ljt,•~/'l0'-JI.
I \tilfl,11 ,tC Annvlll l ft {'vPnu1• l <K \ flt'liHl/1f ID 'h'.tll'I S...,lntc ~ S 1 J , U 7 .111
l u ln1 ,U,<1An nu•I C0 ,1 )1 1,111 .81
l \f C-0,1 o"•' f'l~n nin1 r'P n Od no! nd 11d•n 1 lo11 lltvenufl , S!.00 OC)
I \I fo\l nv .. , Pl,1 n n "I Pio •,od lrt hin,n 11 \►t u 11 ,md 10,1 ~eve nue S I 1l 618 n
l o ,1 pt, 1000 Ullll!On \ )llllt(I SJ .10
•
•
•
•
•
•
Wate r Rote Structu re l'.han11 es
8,1c;•,I Ori m.,ny wm OJOSOf\l fllYI Mod e s di ' mr l,nmg nl()(.} ,-J/f'!f rllle lf!S.'JI ' mo st 11 t 'e"1\••I\ ~lOtl~,f~<; ,>ffu,;i(.<flt "'ltft• u SIJ A
• Ht> ,r11<11 ·na , o~ 11t>1·,•s s.1-y to ~nsu·,• 1•1 1,mm111 .~·me, c nser . .>tro n s.:,v•nQs
111,1,.,,,n~ Pu10 •1IL _---'!~O"'ll~••=l0~2l~ __ _:_J
1• 1t } ,,... rl ,rn,ni P('r 10.i,-_____ 10 ____ -,
Pr ()t' ,m ,•n~1•1 L-----'-'•O~------'
,'vtr'\
r--·· f l tir'IQ[td Annual
i W ~\erUu? Wo ttr Sovmg~
Cu\tomc r Ca teg0 1v MG /i,r MG/yr ,.,,...
S111glt•Fi ml1y 640 1l -··--Multl -Farnlty m ~
Commer cial 338 I
1t1dunrla l 156 l
hllmat ~ Annu11I W~ter !t;iv1n11. )0 t,I C1 v,
bt,m.tt!'d Sd ll lnl!~ over Ptdllnl 1J' ~triod ___ ,0_1 __ ~11,
Costf
Tot.1 1 Co\t to W.ttcr Pruvldt.
C'lf\l • T11m •r,1~ C:.1~tt l,1hru $10,00000
~,111•',t .ictv Ofl llmrn.-ll hv (or \u1·c111t\ SJ0.000 00
llnl• !1mf' l ,1bo1 /M,11,,,1,,1 ( o ·.t --~S-••~•ooo_.oo_
R.tteCat !'JtO f\'
AHumto <On•t'rv/Jt.~,• rrdurtmfl ,.: :,
,, PIOJtCltrJ (0 10 I b1 /t fO ~\nit'' ,'l ()ft'
~hu-JQ(' \tu ,1,c~ hn,r ,'inwn II pr,01(1
,o;,1mgHfo•1 tnwt••r flondo L<\'or('I
\olo na11tm1 "l Onfr,<f 1wd,1 l JI,)
irm mroJcut' aot i no· oue r1 n o n
T1('1('t (';JC"l!0f'l('I\
Nutt')
tounr CO):\ nc, HJt ,•,r/mott•n \fol! t,mr
Jor •<'\t",ramq wo1e1 ·arr oprmr~ nnd
mp,,•m ••lf,"O r1,o,,• nprm.,, f I nrn,,, or
SSO/ho.HJ
(o.H \ o iso mc/uar wot~, ro u.• 1tuoy
complr r,d oy o (()(111.1 1am Dt{OH' o nrw
•1111" u , ,(!IJII' 11 nM()/l'd o rnl•• Uut!v
,.,muld r r rd ro rw romr,Je1 1•a IJy on O.Jt \ic1e
cnmult 'lQprm
rtw annuol •rv .. nut 10~1 1,1,-0~ 1•H1rnotr,1
/>OH,1 (YIC(lff('tH 10 !('\/nt OIi 1nw11
(H,marl'rl Rr11Pnt11 cnu,me5 1hnr l h1
CU1'f'f!r ·011 \ w •/1 n II (hOI Ol' ()Vf'( rh -
0l1mn1f'}DNIOC
f \t "'-11 -'tl A-.,1-11.ir 1 Anuu., M, w1 •r,1 1,••1, 1•1,1ut W,11 ,, i,;i ~,n r•, S•l 'tit, J JtJ. IR /vr ,ll
(\t1n ,,1,,e1 t,vl'u,:r o\,m u,ll R1v<>n11P w 11n W,ltf' ',,,~,n,,, s.i /i.l ,,ll4 b(J /v1•,u
"11 nu,l l Re v,11u, l O\\ Reld!ed to W,ltN SiNlllll\ $99,504.58 Yl",l!
h!/roi;ittPd :\nr,u,1t Co\! $99,50.i S8 -----1:H,m Jted Cou ov~, Pl~nn•nR Ptrlcd not in clud ,ng l o~! Rtwtnut --~S-•O~,oo_a.oo_
(\l l'lllt lf'd r otitl Cost over Pl,1 nnln g Jl tdo(l l11ctud rl lJ s .. , up t1 t1(1 l O\I
S1,0 J S.D4S 84
SJ<1J
Educational Kits
,..r-.1.:,,1,,,,,,i.,,r,,,,,, ,i J •' ,.,,... f~r~ 1,1,,"1,ui<•r~rr,• ,,1 1,t1••/f.•ffl 1r11t if ••h, H• ,1,,J .1 1,,1,,,,.,,,,
''U'• ~1,/1,1' '1· • ,U l',Y/11,f)ut,dl ,r(Jt).,/t1,1/.•f1{1!6f1!1 S<)/l\,·a, '\r t , liJll/.,1 11\/"'1t''\ ·•.,11·.,11,J(l/1 ·t,01 .JI/II,;,\
,, , 1 I' hi .\ ,, .. J I •' ,,,. J I (• , .. ~t'-1/1'1 f ')~(•//rt v,rr ,1,,1(" P, ... •··· ' 111, .. l'' ,, .... , •• I • '•·l'
,,•1••1 , •• ,,,1
' ' •._I -----''°="'-''•=-=='Oc:;ll;_ __ _, ' .... 1~----~··----~ ..... ,.,.,.,,~----~'·~----'
"'""
water use .tnnua!Prc.i\''"'
/ ... llol'li,/Up) P•flkiilll'lk 1-------------+-----i--,-+----------Slngl~f.,l'lll'I 7!1 ,204 7!10
._ __________ M_u_,_>F_,m_l.;.~.__<.;.O•;:;•°";.;.;..' _...__ .. _2?2._ _ _._ _____ .;..;..;..;.c_ __
f ,r1 ,. lf"fJ 'ic11·11 u . H1 r 1 /'19"" 1111 l'r •10<1 ,~ l Ul1 u'ntr-d by, om1xxmdmq fht' t"\t,.•mt"O .:,,rulT' ,,utt1 1(1111~,:\ ;,f'• rl'lf rorol n ,m~• o•
po,uc,pon of()I f'O('I o,~ .. ~ H'OI fmmott'd wa, ... , II Sf' •1 Oll H•drm th!' lollow,•111 .'OO!i 'Oil ,hi"' 'JI:"'
on.-M,tt1"1"1otl Cou ,-
(),.,. f. U• M t l '" •, C',I /b ull P,.w h,1\1' al trRbb
... ,.11,, ► 1• 1 __ ~1~"~''=0000~
O,1/.nr mt 't,.l'.,(.Wl(\lt'I /:,~ lt'lv,J ,,,., ( h
,rb,,lt
Rh arn11al .valf'I CU'IJ t'f'I ar 01' l':l11(DliOOO
1,r, Olf'IIYO,lob/1' at w r,olr~:ol .. f) M 1• I\M
l ()fl\t>tVOt,O'I G1ouo Jrir Jo• S\ ll9 '"'' un.r
t 1•1n t'l uJ • ,,un''1£H,.nJ /(1(K}(;,mir~ ~,u r o11
IJ, tll\lo1t•r;~d r,) Wh/u1fr fiir'f•1,/~""'',)0dl
'roe
11,, 01111,a,rrv.-111,rl,;)1 w o, ,.,,,..,ulrd
CJ11•d011C1Jllt 'I/IC/t'\ '0' ,J/110\Yll
f\l,fltUl••1 llf'Vf'llll'f/1\Uffil"< /nOI /nP
,.,,,,.,.,,u,,.,,..,,11,Mlr irJ '>(J ~ .,,..,11 ,,
pl,,m1mu,,..,,,,. .. ,
l ,1 .. ,,d t "'\.I 11 ,,., .. ,,,. A,, ..... Rt·H· 11,;t ... ,tho.rl ,v .. 1,-, ..... ,11 ,-:, ;i i 11'• ,J'.,•1~, {~, ... ,
( ,t ,rn,lh·J ,~t'•.llt'' Annu,ll p,.\oN •ul' N!lh WJ\f'• \,111n1J ~I 091 !,(,J '•• lynJr
it.nn u.al fl,.11.,nul' l D\\ R@l~tl!d 10 Wll f'f !i ,1 vm 1 1 S1 l 49 7 1!
t ,:,'"1l1!!dAnnu1 ICo,t iz1 i&9 1 l'J
f q m,tt"rl Co~t r "'"r Pt.,nn1 n1 p,..,o d not lncludlnf l o1 1 Rl'v.,nu, S'-Q llOO on
t\1 ,,,,,01111 I OU I Lo\l 0 ""' "l.11'!1'1 .,, llt!rfOC 1,,rlud•rt, \ct !,I p ,1~ lOU
Reven,..!!! H14,IP19;
t o ,1;1e1 IOOOCiilllOn\~I.VfHI S I ,\/
•
•
•
•
•
•
Publ ic Education • bl/I stuff~,. and w~bs lt~
\,',,n •e r IVC,·dEtS ma~ P(lr,od,c;,tl~ oro"•nR c11st,m101":; ...,,111 10 f1/e1 on.,e,..,H/11J1J t'CJ~ ,,, o\'iJ(&r !'1II~ on //HJ , ... tth.•:rlt• ,,rid .i , me trom
,.,., or tre r c ff,ce,
r ,.,,."'"'"''"•~1---''~o~"~"~'~o~"~-~
1•1,, ·,P·1rintfl ~P,.,rd~----"'O------,
Pr. y, 1 I ll'r ~tn l-----'-'\0'--------'
101111 Coit to Watef ~rov1<1er
Cuuomcr C.11:Korv
$In ll'h l'l'lil
Mult •fan11 h.
Co1Tmtro,1
l.1 bor Co us
.. !), ... ·\1
t•;1vly ,·,,
/h ·•1u • u~,ir
M,.1v11:.l,Co11,
Ctr,mo,~d
A\l!tillt'Arfll~I Annual war ,,
W,te1 U \C: f ov,ngs
MG MG/v,
.. o b'
J78 ,,
J38
'"I'"' $S000 ,h ll
Sl.000 00 .,. ... 1
I~•., 11'"1 A ... ,,_.,. t,,,~ 11 If<',• IP.,._••· ,ii \NII"' 1, j,'\ '-4 ,HI ,1\f, J !
i 11 r1n11r-1 A,r,,r,. Ann . l ll"v""l•t• ...,,111 W111>r "h •'P~ .2!. J 18 .&0', 1I'.,
FH r/111/t' /, ,~.~i.1-1, t',/1 .ruJf, .. , (lfl,/
""'I> fr t'dl..l<ll '" \ ;,.
'J •t l'
SrnfJ ,n\ ,ntl(JJ,. r1•1•r 1uefl'CJtl'O(J1·r,u
an , upJO t,,iq ... ra~,rt rmtl o•r:pa,,nu o,//
Ui.1/i'ts
'"" ,1WVVA n,u D•lt HIJ/ff'f1 o.o,/obll• /111
pu•rhmt' ,1..,..,aoe cost Pf'' t,ll 1t11//t'1
ronQt•a f ,om SO ~O to SO 1S Pt''''""'
'"" c,r . '''l'I ~ ,1hn m,,, hn~,,. ti '"'11""' 0,11
m,!/t'f'( on,, rJfl"' n1 ,,.,,1uo/ lrfm111mu,n on
r/1,,. mmunl ,r.,,.,,w ,in~ wos ,.,t,ri.1/rd
tu1,t",lon 1u••r11! 1111,•1/,u vi, TiJ,NII
,.,;tc:r.cr ~
t)lm•1•'r,Jllt,""l llt' ... ,>t"''t'> ./1111 '''"
(ll"f.'"lf •ai r ~,. II 11c11 1 flont1r ovr, tflr
1•hnnin1,,.,,.,d
r,1,m.it~d Annu,1 Re..-en~ Lo~\ Rel<lttd t o W ,u ~r 5;1 v 1n11-SU,630.H 1,,.,
lr,mo1 1•d "-""""l ("l)I SSA,.)£6 .8 ~
htUTUl!d Cost OW'!• Pl1nn,n1t P@/100 "10\ 1nclud1nR lest R@V@ r ue S'H.565.00
R.ewenue $5:ll,868 ~
Online Access ro Wa ter Bill & Hi,tory
JOl3 to 202'1 _)
'l,ttl.! .•, 1,/1 I S:tJ, f!J
Sinl .... fMtlN
Muh.1-Famllv
Commercial
lndl.is1ri 1I
~~11m,1 1•ll An nu.i l WAll!I S.tV!nll\
h t l,.,ntcd S1:111l nK'• UYt'I Pl,,r nong fl c,iod
10
640
l7B
m
.S6 __ ,_,_, rJ1i. ,,
"' r,,
',\,11! .. ('Uf\~--------i·1/V1'!1
,1.,ut..-fo\t . SSOOO /hn11
,i11n,,.,rL 11ir,1 $000 iyl'A'
.,
<k
I<,
Lin ,, 1,1 ~----s"'o-'oo"il 'p .. ,1,, •II ,,,
IP,11 1>rit).••ll., O_/V ,.,t1
,11\~,J•• t I ~00
I 1,,n .11 .. ,1/L,o·• 1,1, ,,~,,,.,t i(, 11•n <'W•ll'·.,,1 .'.'II"' ,IJ111 t'• 1 \'ll',.1.ll) l •
I \'lm,t!<• I 1\y, • 1i'• \m111,1l ~.,,,,,,y,, wttn .\,II•'• \,h'Ui;', Sil 11}1, ,I 'n I',•
r,rru,n .. 01,1rn,, rc,_,.va 1,•t ,r1.;t,·,1
tXHf'i'IOtl ( 1Htn/ fOl f'\ /Of IFI 10 ~'1
Ul\:Oftlt'f\
1,11mtlff'f1ll,'V 1'n111•n,,1111,,•\!n11r llw
,1,• .-r,1r11i,•,,,,lf,•c rr1,11n~1
o,ur r,,ng,:,-,1~-,C
h!11n .i 1f0(1 Annu,1/ R""""'"' lo-,, it .. 1 .. 1,n l o Wu,, \,111/nr S41,11\1 'q '\'• "
I H•m.al f'd AM11.ilfo <I S4q,1s, ,4
l\l1 rn,11f'C1 LOSI O\ltl f'l,t nnln g P .. r100 not'"' udl<1 g •o\f Rl!\ll"nu , su oo
r ulm;alf'd To t/ti Co \• 0""' :ll,1n r,,n g P""od ln 1l'-1 din~ S<e l J JI o1 nt.l l O\I
Al'v,.ru, S.i 97 ,SU9?
Co>!,,.,, 1000 G ,11,...,n .._.\ .. fl SJ 19
•
•
•
•
•
•
Post or Distribute ET Irr /got/on Schedultno
[1 ,m!],l /lO!l <tCh .. dues u,;mq h1s to, ell / ,wrrages ot ..... ~111111 , 11,ua c,m be prcca,~ 111, /tit' Citf t,"V 'I} rne 1rr 11m.on season ,1110
<:.>n, Otil K) ,11, cu,; r1 er ·at f es IO '"'er•"'rlCiJ NfF'll / ,Otp,l lllt'flill(J metr 1'fftJ,lt1(1f' c:,·~l"ltl'i V ,V'I '''" t..nlo,,wo W ,l 'f'f
Consel\,mc1 D•~tr,c " ho~ to.Jl:s 01J the1• .voos,re m:i· c .i,1 1 d ~,1·1, l'11\ r:t1 lr1,1,-.r n r 111> (' n.-a11lf' 1'<11''1 ('lu,1,--.r n,i tfm 1,,i ,
plSterl 011 /I JB "et, at fllf' beg1nrInqo, tor lfC d;rat ,1 QI ti U ,rr,p,l 11ll 1l •w,1.Mn
T t ll'lt!ta81!O utd0OI
\',Q,t1 Usl! MG
Estimated
Annual Wo lt't
Savings
C,"';(om e r c ,•~gc .,· MGhr 1=---=--i .-"5c"·.-,.,...,-+----~i====9
1-------___ ._s.,. r •• _. •""··•"''••_.11 4-----""""o __ +--""'""'----i
r,'.,ll i-hm\l y 189 I Q
Com me,ml 169 1 ,
Tot al Co,t t o Wate r Provid e r
UDOI C01U
\1 ;1H -.nur,,
11:>u:h Co n
o\11n u <1 l l,tOUI
Ma11ii 1l,C01,u
a,, ... ,
S~0.00 1h ou1
$400,00 /V•' I
Uni t ro;;~!~o:,o;t:d~:;l:::l'.~~---1~~~~~-"'1! ;;:::llltO ll t
An"!u,11 Mt1k11clh S7,756 50 'v••;i
Ho\, Ir,'/" 1 ,,r ,l()()/)(lO IJn /1,,.,
r;,,~ "IC'D),.r(' ,..•fre ts r,,n,r:t,·ri o .ra.ic •
WOltr LH,,gt' '(I• r/'lt'(IJ\IC"T!t'I Cll '"90I I"\
VlOVJfl
i .sr,,.•tw• ·11n· n,,oro,m,nrtiv 50~ of i.1r •
v ,t><J v1.1rJo01 \
5tofj n oi,H ,r elude r,mt> 'o/Jt'n ' r.•epor,na
i(t>f'flult'\ St'fld om , ,dwdulr< one r,me
.'lf'f ~f'O I o ,,. t ,m f' ~oH\ inr /11rl f' \(hf>(W f
;,rog,am \t'r 11p
4.,,.,09,. 10.111 ) too a<roimt\
ll'lt' oM.,a, H."11('nuc fois wos rsr,n-:o rrn
nn,rt'I M rur,,•nr rnt;>( fr,, r,'I Tnw r1
fllll Omtf\
[)tm101rd R1.•1wruc 1JH11mt") t hut thr
cu uf'nt rar.,, .,,,,11 no: cnonar o vet thr
fl/(l flf>lrQ(IC'l!(J,I
l:.·,m.r"fl ,,..,,,,,1-;r' fl nn11 1t ~r,,.n,1C' ...,,,nou t w,,r f'r \l\111~\ l} ,l JI '>I 1 10 ,.,.1 ,
r ,\ •111{"(1 ,\H't litt' ,\fl! Ul "{'v{'•1,(' •"'I ".'/ 1!C• S.\',lr'I .;\ 5] 109 ~Q; 'J . 1v••l r
[,11111.ttl'U A1111u.t l Rt:"I:'''"'"' .u" Ri:l.i11:u tu W,1 1._.1 S•"'"'l!I ' Sll ,l 1S 18
ht /m,1 ttd Annual Co~I Sl0,<!71 68 .~ 1
f \t hrt.tted Coit o"'"' Pidnrun1 Pe nod f\Ot ncl u d ,ng IO\t R1•11l•nu e SB 1.56S 00
I ,,1m a t e d IOI di Co,t Ullti! l>ldn ning Pt'r .. ,d lt'(I UC:ifl K Sf'I u p .l 'ld lO\I
q.,.,,.n11 " S 10471f.. n
Cos t oe r 1000 Ga lloo\ Saved S4 49
Scho ol Erlucotlon ProQram -ExistinQ
l1t•f If '• ,\ ·•, • 'lt•dfll t'' t 1)/1.tlll t 'II .-. 1/t
• r.. ,1~--~2~0-'-'n'-'1=--•-'-'20~2=--2 --~
r., r,-, -n ~--------~
Cus tomer C.lfl(l"'I
(Jlllnllle"I'
Ave1i11i1e W1ter Use Annu!' IN~
MG So111r.:9l
MG/}",
'IJ,lh
rt,s,.,~a)u'"-'nh rir;err, S,m(JI• ,o-.,,.,~•
:;l"d ",l .1/f,rom,, "'til''u /..,.Jfl'•u1t1;,•
4 i;,m I lJ _.(" •1!""0 .,, r 1c.11 :,a ~1 J~t•r
u.o'
"';..'----------------------------------1.ne,I C.o st t o Water Provide r
_______ M_•--••;...r __ ,1;..,C.;.;o.;..ll.;..>_~----~
l\w,u,,1 11,•,1h •11.1I, Suil,0•11 ssool ht••·
.\nn 1,11 M .,f•·•11I, SS.00.00 l v••1 1
I ,111 1 ,,1,,,1 A,,,,,,,;•• ,\m 1, 1! M.•-.1 •• H' w1t ht,111 '•'• Ill• \.1\111,: $b,I \ Sli ,'I
fi tnh hr,11r\ mrlmt,. ,,,,.,. ri11•pn11'!7 mr 11r1
/JOI/ 1 1pm ,ng m W :II C"I t /uy ( 16 fl<,.111/
1\iln,,•,1(1/rr\r~ ,-1dt1,,,.nn n,1,.,u'llh1 ri1/i'I
to< ,~urat,on II u 1er,0'1 co,r1
''it ,,rn ,ia' '•'\'"""" ICIH hfl\ ... ,,,-111r ,-,,
h ,ord c.,-c,lftt'nl •nt1-s ,'o• r.11 ',Jwr
(l.)lf>nllH'
l 1frf!1Cft>tl R,-v,'tlut'OS,iunl(') thm '"''
(1,0f'nl ,afl.'1 ...,,u no1 cl 111nt11 ffi'I" l'1,
l)la,,,, .. tJ{lf'f,00
f ·,11•1 1,11~•0 !I JO·t ,1,tt' ,\1u 11,11 ~•'VI,,,,., w 11 V, li t• 'l,,111111i:\ $ti08 } •, )'I ,l'~!
Annu~I Aevf!nu P IO\\ llel;1 1p(t •c W,i tfor \.li 111l"!g , S11,fi)l l 'li
l\t lnutl!d M nu •I Co" S U ,9Jl.1S l y(•,,
r,,1rna tl!ll (O\I 0 11,1 Ot,1n <'l 1ntt Pp r1 od not lnrlu dlr a< 1011 R~@nu, S \ J,000 00
h 11m 4 t e d l olal Cos t over Pl•nnmg Per io d h'l(lud ln , St't u p a d t o n
ll ~•nut> Sl"9.UU S.S
(0~1 pr, 1000 G•llon1, Sav@(I SJ 60
•
•
•
•
•
•
.•~5 /dent/al Wat,r Audits
r,I) C,11 e,rv,:,ons a rf.t::ICIO,,t,31 01.;o,1 p,c>pram 11 -.M r,cfl 10<"<1I fl/ ,m,:,,;,,, rr1a-., tw sJ I 11.'0d fl tJt)lfOf'II ,. Ml" 11Kt1r41 fc,,1 c,.~ror tf>t'I
Pl,1n,.,•gPM t!~ ]01,10 2022
,.,,Ji. nr1;1r,r,,~ilr,,,c1 Ill
t,ni;r ,rnl "''lnl" W
r Hmia te<i ~-\>a te· '>avm2~
o\n,, '"t(,1 11~1 "1 R .. \,1!'111 •l\',d'•" l,V•l•.or fJLI W l hu1.1 Savn I N tl!r.
,\ , I•.· •'ll !t"J Al'!•<lfll· 1,~ ."la'"' .s~ ., .. , 'lo v. th ~av,n.r,1
•g,, lr1. ·r l 7S.858
•~IJI I! •"· -,, l9l ,IJ]4
l a borCOIU
~t,;il l•clU!\ IW~r,, lo' .l\:1;1
1
:~ :~~:t----S-><J-'/)"j~ ~ i •,11
1
AM v al Ub'l' S 1,000 00 '""~'
Uni• (1:1\1 ~ ____ SO_OO-<l /r,,1'1 1r1p,111·
Nu-it, .. , nl r,u ltljldlll~ 185J ~c,u
Annu,1 M 11u•11,1i S0,00 /,t,11
lit1mal t't.1 N o·t, i.lit' r! IJOStJ on the
,,..un..., ,~ ~n:i, ,• · .,,,.,,,.~ ..
S1·1g!er••u,, •"1•J pP11a blf'Mult1
Jfr1•1l\ s ! .'• I ~r
lll•mlltf" tf1<1 1 t,, .'j'J, JO\?/ 1~s•11,•,1 t ,1,
orrou.1 1\ f,ar.,1rop1 ao1q <j,JU.J rntn/ ... ,1,
howl' r:or t,c,oo ttd f •1010• IJ60
c,ur t1c,panrsJ 4i•••· >+ ;nnuaf 00'1,rlt>Ut1on
v/ l 8cu11,JJ11t-t,N,,.}t/u.,,,,,y:-
'1ouSC'II0/'1
(Htm ot~•o Sa,·r,.. "llt'' r10,.,11ma re. ,oJ,i
I.,,. 11/J/Cd tl)' (Onl/)IIUIIIJlll!l lh" ,o(tmnr,•,t
o,,nuol WOtt't \alllnfl, l)~t 1h r /O!(JI 111/'tlbt,
of mJCl1t 11ort u.r1J,,n /a• !"flf ti q,ll'f'n "'"'
r,:r C,t-,' m .1)' hrltJ tJ it t,IJmt*~ ,•1 ro,,rh
Wltfl ltl(t'll')fC'tl(IJ\ftJrlll'I \
IYOlt'S
rn ,~ on,11,ol,rwnur lo~i ""lll 1"<t1ml'lll'd
.. ,1.-don t ulll"IIIW/1•,{<J, ""'""""
CU\l l m("f}
t ,r,m11 frll'..,,Y"•l"UH1trlf"•t1'0l f/>f'
CUfl('I •,,!r~•<ftt1IIQt-,llf"I
p,onn,11,
! ~1m"t .. ,1 '''" "f" Ann1,.tl~ .. ~~ ,~ .. ""'''""' Ndl .. ),I V!!I .;\ _$482,J\" \1$ ,, .. ~,
f .i,m.11 1•tl fl•1(.' J!!t' ;,nn ! 11 ~(',l'f1u •' ...,,,n ~.,111>, \a"""t'\ S480.8:1 10 lw••J•
Anl'lu•I ~(!wfllUf LOH RtlJtf<I IO w.,,, ~~v•n r, Sl ,446 7R
h !l,-,,1l cd Annu a l Coil $l ,44C. 78
l \!1m ,11 ,-d c o ,t o wcr Planmrg Pl'•IOd not ,nclud,ng Lo,1 R1'11P"ut SJ0,000 00
f \lHfU ll!d To u l (Ml 0 111!/ Pl .1 r1 r,ng l'l'ruxl lncl ud h g Su up •nl'l l O\I
R l'llf!IIUP~R -
Comm~rclal and lnduJtrlal Water Audits
1 l/11,,11.,, .J •·' I•' 1•,,t.,,1r,r .. '• .......
20l\to2C22
W~lfl'UHPM l 1p
eus1o~r Ci lflOfV
Cor.,mutltl 319,ll0
lndun1t11 19,S 22 ,S26
[:11 mJl t"d An,.;.1: ."J /l lt·I ; ...... 11. 1 e
11!,m ;t!<!lo;I ~"""IC\(I'"'' l>'11 nn,n1P~••Od --•~•--
11 ,u. rQ I I m
P1t1iO~llllU
lO
,a ce n,w a rr
fJ-Jlleti sf~,
I !'l ,'
11t,ma11•1 w a te· 1,,,.,, 11(..\f'{J On o I 1·1 M l ro r JH' ,,,, ·,•n,n1·•.ic1 · ,01 Jn1 J ,•,11.-1-11 m/1, r, ,11.ir " ''H ,1 /h" ~r•t:"11 tc.,, '"!'"
.',H>t, 1•,11u-,hlf.l l
, ,1,m ,,r .. 11,nmu1 n ... , l'lo111ura 11,. 11"1 i\ H1I, uh,,.rl hi r .. 111,)(1,llr:hl'IQ ,n,. ~•r1 .. 111r.-i1 u,,n .. 11I "'.,.,,., 1uv,~0 1 n,., ,n, rrtlr.f ru-rhrt f 'lw1,
,,..,.,rlf'<,,,lljN f'(I """ ... ,. .,...,. ~"' ... ,;, .. ,,,. ,n ,., .. ,IJ.I ,,.,1, ,, •h,,,1.,J,;10,n ., ! '"II'"_,. /lll''"''"'"h ,,. ,,, .. 1.,. nrl~H•• ,1/ ,,..,,,,,1,1 ,,..,
"'t"lt' U'" wu rr, '"··'"J )/fv,n Ott' IG '"'"'ll'-'U!II\ ,,.,,., ,,,, vru• 1 F."tl\l'"'"' .,,,J, r• v.i,1 .. 1•.nl "'"'~'" lVlllj',..,JJ,r",I fl!r \(ht"IJ\
l,UKlt (ml\
...... , .... 1 "!""'
" ,'") <>,~. S~.00 /I.I),
,\,,~1.,1 ,11 __ ~/v"•
,I ~•\1[2:fj/P,I •• "''r
,,_.,, '••"•I'''" ."I Y"~
s u1,:i,oooo \ ..
wu .. ,M,1 1,n l/OI/)
tv11t"nt M,11 r1/t ff1
1 ,,,~,..•,,,.,,,A,,,.~•1<,·,",,.,.,,,1 1.,1> .,,,n;r ~
,. ,, ,.t,•·1 h, .. ,.~,. \,,n, ,1 '-'• ,, ,.,,,.,.. "'' ,•, 111'• ,.,_,. It' ~h•I .,<,4 (1 1
lin.,.,,11,1.,w ,..,..,., nt• 11 "1-'i"d l n WA 11'1 \;i~,nt1 )ll,11!1 18
., l/11t11,,,11u ,1o,,·IH••·/'-"''•ll lu11 r1tl"
,..,,,,.,,,..,,rv ,,111\u'rtJ/'lr
I ,,nwl•w ,,~,,~1,tJ,••,1• .. ,111• llf'l/t,11/1 iotJtl •
t1 •1~1 '<t;II' t11 lr,(n1•/"l '"'"''"'\
•ccoo,.._,,r,Jd,•
1•,.•ur,.wJ ,,., .. rur' ,,c, ..... ,, .. ,,,m,111"a
t, n~a .,, ,.,,,~nl ''"''"' f :,, ,1/ '"""'
t l•»1.1t 1l ll1"•f1,1>t '-'''"" r ~ lhM ,r,,.
,,,.,t"fllnl"I""''""'' r.,inqr m .... ,rn,•
r:·,,.,-,, .. qpl'tl(l(l
•
•
•
•
•
APPENDIX B • P·1t,i1c Hv,e u P t f'(•p,; ..
1 L ega i
l Publication
ln l o 'ue
=-=-
( C:uhy Bw ,~~ ·
C,ty o f I!, •·('le, tt.·•
I OC ~l l:.nylu,• • ... •·~
E noll~'.\'000 l ' 6 1l
-----
/'
Ad# T ex t
OC10:'.\I OCi l<o 42 11 Wl'tTFR
Pilyme · :ms NP.I 30
Stan
11 •1'26 20 1:i
Al '.dav 1s \'1 ;, tc scn1 ui:or ,eu• ~, 01 pavme··1
\.
: ' -
Ow.:0,11~ o:;•21,20 13
Slop Ins Amount
04 '26/201 20 80
Total Du e
Prepa id
000
•• i
j
Due
?O 80
•
• 20 .BO
•
•
•
P 1 one POJ ) :166-4089
F ro m.I vor1e1il/iJ'Ou tc IOr i<\loi,c1•,s com
S l,tl C c,I Co lo r;td O
Coullly o f Mi!J).=t i 1o e
AFFIDAVIT OF
PUBLICATJO N
lf.S
Ti u!, Afri il;iv ,t r,I Pu hhrm1 n 11 for lhO Fngtr-wor.n H f"l ,1111 .. , w ,•1'1 1.,,. 111_!'1",'<';f\;\IH'I r 11n•pd
,,nrJ pu t1 •~h ell lo, lh c Co ur uy o l t..1,1p,11c,c s 1~11~ ol ColC11i1 J u. hc:11.:Uy <.c1 11fic :» ll•r1 t
th-e mt;;ct,e:l le:):1I ,,otrct> wH s p~1bhS nl:tl m s~•O "IC wsp.1 pc r once 111 e clc h wee k for 1
s ,.cu:ss1v (! W(:t:k ls\ the lil~t ol wh1 l'h l)ll l)l1cm 10•1 \\ilS llliHlC lhC 2U!h <lily al Aoril
I\ D 2 01 3 , .J mJ 1h:,1 COtl•C !:. or C3Ch numbCI c,I !:.:"UC P:I PCI ... w h ich 5:nd Pubhc
No11ce \-..as p ut ihsh c :.t \,er{' oc1,vereo t:y earne r::. o r t1 tm sm 11ted Uy flla11 1:J each o l
1/1-: sub sc ,ibe rs of ~.a id paper a c.c o 1d in g 10 the ir accuslomed mo <lc d busmc s~ in
fo r lh-: En ylt!WOOd Ht!r c1 IO
S1~1e o f Colorado J
County of Arapaho e 'ss
lrn lo,,-. ,no oy 11\0 ilhove ,,:,rnl'd Grn ;.u d H o"tcy. pu:1h!:h c.H o l s:11d ncw:::.p:1pcr .vh
1s ucr~o11a lly i-:nowo to me 10 t>e 1t1e 1d ~1,11ca1 pe·sOl'1 in 1t1c c,bCl.'C ce rt1hca1e on u-1s
26th o.:i y of /\po l A O 20 13
Not;u y Pubhc .
l'l.b llC NO i iC[
or l h f: }0 1:J \'YII I ER CO NSE lll/A." 10:, PL ,~N
CITV or EflC L(\'1000 COLO IM OO
f"'l.HLIC COP.l\lfN I Pr;r.100
MF,, 1-.1 -JUL Y ,1 .'l)I J
l\·01 -c.e•, ne1 i-•I,\ \I'~"'' 111.il U•.i t; • ., ,,I CnQl-t N/'1(1(1
CO I\ ur,11:i1111g •I > 199; W,m,,, Coll !;t'I\MICl!l :•ruu
flllt\11,1111 10 Sl;'l lt.• ',I ,',/ ,,.~ C"v 1~ ,eel mu 1,u :.,h1,
r o 111111.-11 1 O~i'• 11 , .. "(H I r.n lll'(&
111 • C, 1 s 'lO 13 \'l'~:,,, C t1 1•St•11,1 lt'ln f"l•,1, •~
,U-~ l•'~•l.! 1:1 P•UlltUI•• II IO.! ,,:JM',1011 1 V II ~1,, ti t,i,,• u: 1111
.... , ... , ..... ,~t! ti,· o+•!,~ .. ,. •• 1·.,~,n, "~•'\ ,, "' If ·:1 1
fl l Nl•lllll1~•U:>/O nl('ll .•lot:• ••l,C1atl\ u,;e tll •t ·'•""'
1e•nurt,:~. lll\1'1 111\ll'll ;1 !uhrt (> .lllt,-tJUolt: \\,II"'"
·1111,r•~
1,,~ :'f/1) \\.-1 .. , Ct'll!t P t\1 111(1 , p,,, .\,l•l.,(,t .. /,J,
••••• .. •·t>y1h" 1'uh11.-,1•1._, M ,11 I ~1,l .1 111 11,,.
i:11 .,l•,.'"Uo\l C,.,,, Cv,.•;,,,. 1000 (11t 1tw .. 1,10<I 1'111 6-w,I\
rt11l--.~r"'l'I C O rt ,11n 1 ,,.,1.,1.11 h uS~~'>!' h<,t r!t .. u o
1n 1w1•1"111l(•1\C,0,1!1'1Vt 1,i l 'uc •ul,:.,._ •,1uru11,,
,.~"•Mf'<ll "" u .. , ·,l.ln (.Ill ~,,11 ... ,1 .... ,,n ~, .. Cf,Ontll•·••h
t•.1 f., .. ~cl ,,t,OJ . ~h u II • UI M ,,., Qt'j!J U1 t1e11 1 ,,I
c,,f ,-1 ;111 r , 10 ... 1nn1h 1•C:ll )'"'d ~•.''\,I:, t 0 1111••1 1n,11 1
~ 00 p •u Of1 M L•l o(l;tv, Ju1, 1 ;!fl 3
I ll• 1•<11 ! r,I co•1t,1c1 '"' It~ ::0 1)•N,11JI
CC•\lroe lV:11,on Pl,Ul ,s v,1 <,~~1 r,n..>,.1.,,,1, E 1"i,llo::W01.,,..J
•J1 .. ,,..,o,,,,,,,111 "' ,1 .,1 1('111c;1 -:::0 5;-
L• i;a1 tJOl tt,;f' r~o ,1 2 1 1
I '"' r 111>11CO h('t1 A111 11 2r, 201J
l ;,5! rul,h ttll('" -'1 m1 ?G ?ft 1.1
l•u"ll1 • ~• 111(' E1 ,g1c...,OC'lo l i•i-1 ,11<1
APPENDIX C
Pu blic Commenrs and Response •
•
•
•
2013 ENGLEWOOD WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
COMMENTS AND RESPONSES
I he City of En glewoo d ha s cc mµleled ,ts 60-day pu blic review pe ri od for !he
Wa le r Co nse rvatio n Pl,1n Iha! bega n nn M,1 y 1. 20 13 lh mug h July 1, 20 13 Off icial
no l if1ca li on was posled in the En gle"'·•.·, Herald (copy atta ched). A complete copy of
the Pl an was ava 1laOle al l:nglewooo 1., v1c Center and on the City 's website . Duri ng the
pu blic-review period . he City , eived ~.gh 1 co mme nts on th e Plan
Com pl ete copie s of the publi c t;0 mmt11ls ,re lound ot !h e end of this Append ix . The
'"!lowing is a su11mary of lh ~ w r Issues conveyed In the pu b lic co mments, and
c:ngle wood's response .
)(c riscape Programs and Measures
' ,'o upl e of co mm en s req ues tec1 lhe incor poration of Xeri scape pro gra ms and
11,.: nlives. The C11y did cons ider Xeriscape programs during !he initial sc reening of
po1en l ial co nse rva tio n meas ures and pro gram s. Based on the Ci ty's sc reen ing criteria
(1. staff lime , 2. financia l impl ica tions an d 3 . polit ical ramifications ). the City does rio t
cur ren tl y have th e statt resources lo implemen t Xeriscape programs an d dt d not feel th e
programs merited putt ing mone y into il. The Ci 'y will re-evalua te Xeris cape measu res
and progra ms with future water conservat ion pla ,tning efforts . Englewood residents are
encouraged lo utilize Xeri sca pe landsca pe .
Turf and Landscape Restrictions/Standards for New Construction
One comment reque sted lhal Eng lewood hmtl the amount of gra ss for new homes and
bus in esses and require the us e of low waler usage gras ses . Englewood staff
co nsid ered turf and la ndsca pe res lriclions/sta nd ard s for new co nstru ction . Based on
the City's scr eenin g cri ter ia ( 1. staff tim e, 2. finan cia l implica li ons and 3 . pol itica l
am ifical ion s), the Cit y dec id ed to re-evalua te new cons tru ctions res tr icti on s a~d
standards wilt, futur e water conservatio n pl annin g efforts.
Mandatory Watering Schodule
A resident req uesied tha t Eng le wo od go lo a man dAlory lhree-dAy -a-wee k watering
sche dul e on a pe rman ent ba sis . While thi s may be neces sary during a water shortage
or d ro ught. the Cit y fell lh al a man datory thr ee-day-a-week wate ring sc hed ule is no t
necessa ry to rea ch its water co nse rv ation goa ls.
Water Rates
Th e re were seve ra l co mm ent s provided rega rd ing wale r rates One co mm en l
sug geste d lhal th e Cit y shou ld use a ba se rate whi ch accounts for th e cost of the
syste m ope rations . plu s a reasona ble amoun t o f water for household use and
lan ds ca ping , (with an all owan ce for l rees an d ga rde ns) and th en have a su rcharg e for
excess ive use, an d an even high er rate for usage th at is Cl ea rl y wa ste ful or ab us iv e.
In corpo rated in to the Co nser vatio n Pla n is c ~a ler ra te stud y. The stuo y will cons id er
all of the elemen ts of thi s co mmen l and de te,,n ine 1f any changes need to be ma de to
Engl ewoo d 's curren t water rate stru ct ur e.
~~e resid ent was concerned th at th e City Cod e rega rding the conversi on of flat -rate
cu st ome rs to metere d custom ers wa s changing to requi re l la H ale cus10me rs to ,nstall
m etPrs. The City Co dP. rs not ch;ingi ng Th e Eng lewood Meter Rep lacemen t Program
(Erv, .. P) discussed in lh e Pl;in is vol untary. EMAP ta~es th e di fference be tween what
the customer pays for the non-me tE:red rale and what th e cu sto mer would pa y for th e
metered ra te and uses tha t mone1• to help pay the cos t of in stall ing the wat er meter . If
provided a grant by the CWCB , Eng lew~od wo uld like to ex pand upon thei r curr en t
progra m by provid ing 50 to 100 metms at no cos t to the custo mer wh ile the cu stomer
contin ues to pay the fl at ra t charges , as furt her lncentr ve fo r meter rep lace m ent II lhe
customer conve rt s, the money recP.ive d by the City wo uld go to prov idin g a meter fo r
anoth er flat rate custome r
•
The Coty wou ld hke to respond to an in accu racy rega rding Englt ·oo d·s wa ter rat e$ as
compa red to Denve r's water rat es . The com m ent slates that Den ve r ra tes are
$2 .59 /1000 gall ons pl us $6 33 admIn fee ; En glewoo d's rate is $3 .29/1 000 gal lo ns plu s a
$9 71 admi n fee . Acco rdi ng to the res ident, ii yo u use 10,000 gallons 111 a brllr ng pe ,,oo
you pay S4 26/1000 gal lons 111 Eng lewood, vs $3 22/1000 gall ons In Denv~r . Howev er ,
the ca lcu lat ion d id not co nsi der th at Denve r Wa ter bill s monthly while Engl ewoo d bil ls •
on a quarte rly bas is. If we exami ne a scena rio in which one uses 10 ,000 gallons per
mont h for a three-m onth period, a n Eng lewoo d residen t wo uld pa y $3.6 1/1 ,000 ga ll ons
as compared to S3 .22 /1,000 gnll on s in Den ve r.
A com ment was mad e regard ing th e fa ct tha t Engle wood 's ctIrr ent ra te stru cture
charges less per 1,000 ga llon s fo r water co nsu mp tio n over 400 ,000 ga ll ons. The
cu rren l ra le stru cture Is an in centiv e for indusiry and large water us ers and ii is u11 like ly
that residen ts will reach lhe 400 ,000 gallon thr es hul<J. As mentioned previ ously , a waler
ra le sludy wi ll evaluate the curr ent wa ter rat es and determine if any chan ges need to be
m ade to Engle wood 's current water rate s1 ruc turc .
Rainw~ter Harvesting and Graywater Reus e
r here w,~re a couple of comm ents ma~~ regnrd Ing ra inw ate r harve sting an d
incorp ora l 'ng th e practice Into th rs Pl an. Ca ptunng rainwa te r is an 011 goi ng iss ue in
Colorado , a nd it is no• allowed if it will in jure ves ted wate r rig ht s. r or the ,11ost part ,
C ol orado law does nc,, all ow hom eowner to collect or use rainwa ter run off from roof
unles s the ir only source of wnte r rs n we ll on the property
In 2009 , however, lhe Co lo rado Sl ate Legisla l u,·e passed two laws that ca rv e out
ex 1mpt 1ons from lh e oenera l rule -The nrst law i;ay s lha t if yo u are not served by a
domestic wate r system and you are localed i11 e dt•si gnated ground water basin or your
co ll ec ti on sys tem qu alifies as exempt from 3 7-92-602i 1)(g)(I), you are all ow ed to •
•
•
•
ca pture ra inwater for househola , fire protection stock watering and irrigation of up to
one acre of lawns and gardens as long os it is applied to u ses speci fi ed in th e we ll
permit that applies to your property . The second law all•Jws the State to participate in a
study af 10 ~ew developments to determine the imµ:ir.t o f capturing rainwater on
streams. ri ve rs and tr ibu tary groundwater
Addi tionally a couple of commen ts we re made rega rding graywater reuse Th e term
"graywater" means disch arges from bathroom and laundry room sink s, bat htu bs ,
showers, laundry machines and other sourc es authorized by th e Colorado Water
Quality Control Commission . In May 2013, the Colorado Genera l Assembly passed
House B111 1044, which authorized the use of graywater. The majorit y of Englewood's
wa ter right s do no t allow for reuse, particula rly if that reuse involves furt he r co sumption
of the water .
Public Education
A coup le of comments were provided regarding publi c educa tion Based on th e Ci ty's
s-•~e ni ng criteria ( 1. staff lime , 2 . fin ancia l implic ations and 3 politica l ram1f1 ca11 on s ),
tt , Cit y does not curren tl y have the staff resou rces lo devote to ed ucational classes .
H ,. ''Iver. th e Plan includes educational kits, public educa ti on through newsletter , bill
stu ' ;rs and the City Websi te , online oc cess to water bill and history and di stribution o f
ET 11riga lion scheduling in wa ter bill. Th e City will re-eva lua te education measures and
p rog ram s w ith future water co rservation planning efforts .
City Building Fixtures
A comment was made tha t every to ilet tha t is In an Englewood con tr olled build ing
sh ould be modified o r replaced with low usage toilets . Cu rrently, as new toilets and
fix tures are needed in City buildings low water use fi xtures are u sed as a replacement.
Comment 1: I strongly recommend that everyone involved wit/I th e water conse"'ation
p la n be required to read "Rainwaler Harvesting for Dry/ands and Beyond Vol. 1-3 " by
Brad Landcasler. I would also like to see th e cit y use more xe riscaping ;irou nd city
focilitic s. It's baffling why you hi>ve lawn around places like the wrP, city maintenance
facility, Police station, etc. The o nly person who ever sets fo ot on those expanses of
grass are the people who mow them, truly a waste of water and maintenance. Allo w
and implement the use of greywater. Give incentives for xeriscapmg. Limit the amount
of grass for new homes and businesses and require the use o f low water u sa ge
grasses. Go to a mandatory 3 day a we ek watering schedule all of th e time
i:;,o rnmenl 2. Water is tile staff o f life .... we all know that . We cannot do with out it a nd
our quality of life, pa.rtrcula rly here m th e dry We stern Desert, <'epends upon th e
availability of go od , clean water. I am sure tha t is why our c i vic leaders in En glewood
worker/ so hard In obtain water right s for Englewood-to insure that our qualify of life
wou ld remain high because we had enough water. In th e 1970 's. Englewood had a 'Y/a t
rate " wat'J r billing system. We paid in ad va nce, ,a nd th e city had a stable, absolu tely
predic table fun d to pay the cost u f p1ovidirr9 water. Our lawns and neighborhoods were
green and invrting. The narno "E nglewood " seemed lo describe our green urban forest .
Now we have water meters end we sell our "excess" water lo more affluent
neighborhoods Th e rationale for this was th at by selling our excess water. Englewoo d
would have plenty and our rate s wo uld stay tower I/Ian suffo unding cUies .
Unfortunately, this hasn't work ed ou t. Denver rate s right now are $2.5911000 gallons
p lu s $6 .33 admin l ee : Englewood 's rate Is $3 29/1 000 gallons plus a $9. 71 admin fee . II
you use 10,000 gallons in a billing perio d you pay $4 .26/1000 gallons In Englewood, vs
$3 .221 1000 gallons 111 Denver As 111 st a side note, 1/ yo11 are one of Englewood's "out of
ci ty " metered customers, you only pay an admm fe e of $9.22. So mu ch for th e th eory of
"s ell off our wa ter and pay less to rt • water we use ."
Over th e past several decades, as Eng lewood 's wat er policy ha$ moved from a flat rate,
predictable cost lo .:i metered cost. Englewood 's neighborhoods have con s1stentiy
declined in appearance Certainly .:i big p.:irt of tha t ha s been th e fa ct tha t blu egrass
lawn s are wa ter guzzlers and have become ve ry expens ive lo maintain under the
current water p ricing system, and as you drive th rough the city you can see numerrws
homes with dead ar abandoned lawns, but a/so fewer ga rdens and more negle cted
tree s. No ra lio11 af pe rson is going lo sugg-.sf th at we er,c ourage bluegrass la wn s, or
running water ir, fil e gutt er Bui ow policies are r,o/ encow aging APPROPRIATE
WATER USE to Keep Englewood Beautiful. As 1/w appearar,ce of our neigl1burlroods
continues il s decline, so does the desire 10 live here, raise a family , participate in civic
affairs, and so forth Our water policie , have contributert to th is de cline even though we
seem to have enough wate r to take a more enlightened approa ch, saving wate r
appropr,atety, but encouragmg wator use th at keeps En gle wood an attractive. livable
city . II is vexing to me that Englewood 's neighborhoods can1 afford th e wafer that we
are selling to oth er, more afflu ent metr o neighborhood s to wa ste on THEIR lawns and
green space , which they seem lo do with reckless abandon , oven to tho point, in
Highlan ds Ranch , of penalizing homeowners who do no t use enough wate r on their
lawn s. Ob viously, /h ay have recognized that people want lo live and do business in a
city which has visuall y app ealing trees, landscaping, an d so forth . We apparently
/Javen '/ figured that 0111, even tho ugh we already have the wa ler resou rces.
Obvio usly, the cost of water is a much sma ll part of a fa mily's budge t in a more affluent
community I/J an it is in less affluent Cn glewood. So I see nothing in th e propose d Wate r
Conservation Plan to encoura ge Ille APPROPRIATE US E of //re wate , Englewood
owns to improve th e quality of th e appeara nce and livability of the City of Englewood.
tak,ng into account th at our cit) is not as Rfflu en t as some of our Southern ne ighbors
For ins tance, Eng lewood ·s development guidelines require rr ees, and our Concre te
· /eptacement p lan require s repla cemen t tree s when a tree is removed next to a
sidewalk . But our water ,::onservation plan gives no though t le the cos t or effort in volved
in owning a tree. or the water required. Trees are an expensive ?'1ditio n lo a
homoowner 's lan'1scape. Th&y require watering , maintenance, insurance , trimming, and
pro bably e1•en lual expensive re moval. I guess a "conservation minded '' citizen should
simply do without free s. But can you imagine Eng lewood without trees? Certainly the
"wood " part refers to our attractive urban forest. I imagine th e growing number of
apa rtme nt dwellers in Englewood feel that the ir water rate should be lo wer, after all they
don't /Jave trees, or grass or ga rde ns. or flower s to lend. wa ter and mairtain.
So it se ems to me Ill a/ Englewood homeowners should r,ot be di sadvan taged wh en
compared to apartme nt dwellers, or to homeowners in mo,e affluent areas to whom
•
•
•
•
•
•
Englewood sells waler . While a homeowne, will pr o bably use 111ore ware,, 11Ju c /J of that
will ro enhance the urban landscape , providing rre es and la ndscaping which enhances
all of our quality of fife . There is clearly a benefit to the community provided by
homeowners who invest in tree s and appropriate landsc ap ing, and a water c onservation
program should recogn ize this be ne fit and encourage trees thro ugh waler pricing. Tre e
ownership should not be mandated by /he Crty. and then imme diately penalized by
Englewo od 's wa ter pricrng policy . Similarly, some th ought should be given to th e socia l
and community benefit provided by a homeowner who has a flowe r or vegetable
garden, enhancing the beauty of the neighborhood and the livability of the urban
landsca pe . These gardens sh ould be encouraged, not penalized by wat~r p1ici11y when
co mpared to the pe rson who only p lants a wa ter guzzling bluegra ss lawn . Again, isn 't ,t
cu rious that the City of Englewood is now subsidizing a commu nity garden for people
(apartmen t dwellers) v. ho can not ha ve their own garden . but gives no break to the
l1 om eowne1 wh o owns, pays laxes 011 , and pto vide s his own gwden area . Additio na!ly,
,t ts curious tha t thi s "Conservation Plan" doesn 't seem to encourage , or even to allow
so me innovat ive con se1Vatio n techniques. such as grey water system s. rain barrels. low
flow toilets, and so fnrth . Grey wate, sys tems should be en couraged when appropriately
designed and ins talled. There is no go od reas on why bathing or hand weshmg wa ter
cannot be used again for 10I/et flushing before it p asses bac k into the san itary sewer
system Thi s doe s not affecr the amount of water a var/able for ra-,ntroduction back into
th e river as treated effluent, but will redu ce th e amoun t needed to ope rate a house hold .
Similarly, cistern s des igned to cotch end us e rninwat er for garden or lawn, or household
use shou ld be encouraged and allowed. ft is cu,.'ous 11 ,at Englewood "claims " th at run off
rain wa ter creates a storm drainage burden that ,;:ust b< ·emediated through a ta x, but
will not allow a homeowner to ca tch and use th at rain water. thereby eliminating this
storm drainage burden. Homeown ers should be encouragod to use low flow toilets, low
now sllowerl,eads, dtip itrigation for flowe,beds and gardens, ii not tllrougll a ,ebate
program then at least th rough an educa tion progrom, classes, product
recommenda tions . and so forth . Some considerable thought sho uld be g,ven to th e
problems faced by a family trying to plan a family budget and th e effects of a constantly
changing wa ter bill which seems to be out of their control. A family should be able to
predict its water bill with some certainty, even /hrough periods of drough t. I suggest th a t
th e c ity slJo uld use a base rate which complete ly accoun ts for the cost of the sys tem
operations , plu s a reasonablt: amount of water for household use and l andscaping;
(with an allowance ior trees and ga rdens, es mentioned earlier) and then have a
surcharge for exce ssive use , and an oven higher ra te for usage that is clearly wasteful
or abusive . Under this scenario. a family could reas onably plan and know its costs. and
would be encouraged to not abuse or wa ste th is water re so urce, but would be
encouraged to have trees, a garden , flowers and so 101th . The rate paid by apartment
dwellers should taJ,,e into account that someone else, i.e. hom eowners and the City
through its parks, is paying the cost of th e landscaping amemt,es, tree::, lawns, and so
forll> which we all enjoy in this SUBURBAN environment In Sum mary, we all kn ow that
wa ste ,s bad. Now we need to re cognize th at the quality of //le in Eng /wood, in Iha
future, will be determin ed by how we allow and en co urage appropria te use of the water
res ource s we o wn . and whi;.'1 we are c.:m stanf/y reminded thal are m or e than adequate .
Our Conservation Plan should plan for no/ j ust water conservation, but shou ld embrace
innovative water saving /echno/ogies ro "st retch" rhe warer we can use. a,1d should
E N CO URAGE THE APPR OPRIATE USE OF WATER , using our pricing meclia rnsm to
ins ure tha t we ha ve Ill e k/111.l of lands caping , trees, gardens, flowers an d wa ter efficient
landscaping rt,at wi/1 "Kee p En:;!ewood Beautifur and provide a high qualit y of life fo r
our re sidents and business es.
Comm ent 3: Page ES-1. Pa ra graph 3: table ES1 wou ld se em lo indica te tha t wate r
us ed should be 70,677 I\F (or are you refe rring lo a savings?). Page 12, re ference lo
fig 2.4; do wa really cha rge le ss for more con sumption? $2 .04 for heavier users vs.
$3. 29 for lig hter users .. Thal wou ld seem lo discourage conservation 1-'age 15,
re fe rence to fig 2. 5 sho uld be 2. 6 (or vic e versa ).
Commenl 4 · /c 2.2. Where are the Rainfall numb ers from? Eng lewood, Waters;1e d
fro m wh ere , •. Jet our wa t er , sn owpa ck, does ii exc lu de our snowfall, etc.? ... I'd like
lo s ee a refere11ce Figure 2.5. on th e Y axis it is really ea sy to (men tally) put a comm a
where there is a period in the Y va lue s, I would recommend using the numb er without
decimals (e.g 1000) or with only one decimal (e .g. 1000 .0) ..... or j ust use billion ga llons
with one do cimol. Prett y amazing how wa ler use ho s gone down (3 billion to 2 bi/lion)
.... So mething was really dore rig ht lo get this lo happ~n ! Figures 2. 1 and 2.2 need to
be readable (higher resolution ?). Figur -• 2.2. Engl~wood Water (Ma ins/Lines?) over 8
inc hes in Dia mete r I kn ow what you m ,n but c1 r11ens m1g11r nor
•
Comm enl 5: I've a ll ached a brochure from Ille City of Calgary, Alber/a, t11ar encourage s •
residen ts l<J collect ra inwa ter for tlleir lan dscape watering . r suggest that Englewood
consider this prac tice . Ottawa, Ontario, Convention Centre collec ts rainwater for to ile t
and urine/ flu shing saving 359,000 ga llons p er ye ar-another practica l co ns ervation
approach .
I appreciate that this 1s a Water Conserva tion Plan but I think ii concen trates too much
on red11 cing water use inct11rling punitive measures , and not enough on efficienr use of
th e resource. I believe th e plan should discuss co llaborar ion with othe r City departm ents
to achieve some of the goals. For insla nce working with Par~s and Recreation IOI
,;du ca tional seminars and even garden s and alte rnat ive grasses for law ns, or
Community Development lo achieve a balance between la ndsc ap ing require ments and
w aler use.
Englewood participates in the Ar::ior Day Foundations Tree City program promoting a
h ea/lhy urban fores /. Warer pla ys an essenria l part in maintaining th at urban fore st f he
only mention of trees ,n the entire plan is on paga 25 where it talks abnu r removing
n ar,ve tree species as a way of conservin g wa rer! EMC 16 -6 -7 de ta ils required
landsc aping standard s for new developmen t and again th is plan doesn ·1 rea //y address
llw water use issues µresented by rltese City require me nts.
Public education is an essential el ement if this plan is to succeed, but aside from tho
Pipeline publication , while widely dis tributed I suspect isn 't v11d e1y re ad, there see ms to •
•
•
•
be little else In fact, accordin g lo Page 27 Xeris cape educa tion is le ft to Denver W;i /er
Wh ile th o Wa ler Day for scho ol ch ildren is a laudable orogram, it 1s the paren ts who
make most of 11 ,e wa le, use de cis io ns I would h ale to se e Englewood buried in
m ountains of crusl1ed rock sim ply be cause ii req u,res less water.
Com ment 6' Every toile t th at is in an Englewood controlled building should be modifie d
or replaced with low usage ones.,,fire statio ns, police building s , court ho use s
,.,,Englewood. Public build ing s,elc ,.all :
Co mme nt 7 . "Water ConseNalion Plan · Will we keep the code below ? It do es no /
req u,re all fla t rat e cus tom ers to be updated Is that correct ?
"The Englewoo d Municipal Corl~ in clude s a requ iremen t for a ll fla l -rate cus tomers to
ms/all app roved wa ter meter s ,vhcn th ey sell or tran sfer I/J eir prope rty . The Code
states. "All owners of propa r1 y having unmetered waler service shall be required to
in stall approved wa ter me ter with in n ine ty (90) days afr e' the sale or tran sfer of the
prope rty or change in prop erty use fro m residenlia l lo commerc ial or industrial.
Whe never a meter is lo be in sta lled, ii shall be supplied b y th e Englewood Utilitie s
Depa rtm ent al th e own ers cost "
Commen t 8. After re ading Mr . Woulla rd 's a11icle in the I lub regarding waler
conseNalion, it really peaked my int erest as I am one of /he 10 00(0) plus h omes on a
wal er me/er .
I understand /here are 2,074 single family dwellings under /he flat rate system, an d I am
sure seve ral of the se homeowners a, e trying lo con se rv e water. However, there are a
per.:e ntage of th ese home s Iha/ are laking advantage of this system. I have a neighbor
th at will use one of th e fo unta in type sprinklers . The y will set ii 111 one spo t in th e
morning an d ii will still be in the sa me spot in /h e afrem oon . Wh en con fronted as to why
/hey would do such a th ing t!Iere comme n! fs "we dor:·, care we donY pay /or waler." In
addi tio n I driv e S. Logan lo Be lle vie w lo and from worl< every week Th ere are a few
house s where th e wale r ;5 on in the afternoons prior to 6:00 pm. I do not know whether
these homes are mete.-ed or on /h e fla t ra te system, eilher w,:y th ey s hould not be
waten·ng during the hea t of th e day
MJ• opinion is Ih a / alt sir1!}le family dwellin gs should have a me ter installed sooner than
la ter .
2013 ENGLEWOOD WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
COMMENTS AND RESPONSES
The Ci ty of Eng lewood has comp leted it s 60-day public review period for the
w.>ter c.onserv ation plant' at began on May 1. 2013 thr ough July 1, 2013 Official
not,tication was posted ,n th e Eng lewood HP.raid (copy anached). During the pre-
approval P" iod , three newspaper articles were publi shed ; an arti cle in the Denvnr Pos f,
Yo ur Hut> ;q ed Ma y 29, 2013 , 'E ngl ewood er J'es wa ter co nservation plan, seeks
input," an ,>rti cle in the Coyote Gulch da ted May t , 20 13, "Englewo od rolls out d1ofl
waler conservation plan #CO drought," anJ an article ,n the En glewo od l-lerald dated
Apri l 26, 2013, "Wa ter pl an awai ts com ment." A complete copy o f tl>e plan was
avai lable at Englewood c ,v,c Center and on the City 's we bs it e During th e publ ic-review
period, the C ity re ceived eight comments on the plan .
The following is a list of the comments, summary of the core iss ues co nveyed in
,he public comments, an d Englewood 's response
COMMENTS
Comment 1 · I strongly recommeno th at ever;one involved with the water conservation
plan be requ ired to read "R,inwater Harvesting for Dry/ands and Beyoncl Vol. 1·3 " by
Brad Landcaster. I would , ·so like lo see l/1e cily usa more xeriscapi11 ,. around city
facih l ies. It 's baffling why you have lawn around p laces like the WTP, city maintenance
facility, Police station , etc. The only person who over set s fool on th ose expanses of
grass ore the people who mow th orn , truly a waste of water .ind maintenance Allow
and implement tho uso of greywater. Give ince ntives for •eriscaping . Limit the amount
of gross for now homes and businesses and require the use of low water usage
gr'Js ses Go to a mandato ry 3 day a week watering schedule at/ of the tim e
RES PONSE :
Xerlscape Program s a nd Measures
Several con 11ne11 ts requested the incorporation of xeri~cape programs and ,ncentivcs .
The City d,d cons,oer xeriscape programs during th e initial screening of potential
conservatio n measures and programs . Ba sed o n th e Ci ty 's scree ning crite ria ( 1. staff
lim e, 2 . r,nancial implication s and 3 politica l ramifica t,on s), the C.ity does not currfill!!y
•
•
•
•
•
•
have the staff res ources to implement xeriscape prog rams and did not fee l the
progr mns merite d putting money into it. The City w ill re-,!Y.aluate xeriscape measures
and programs with future wa ter co nse rvation plann ing effo rts . Englewood residen ts are
encouraged to util ize xe ri sca pe landscape.
Commenl 2 : Water 1s the staff of ftfe .... we all know that. We cannot do with out ,t and
our quatit_v of fife , particularly here in the dry Western Desert, depends upo ·, the
availability uf ~ood, clean water. I am sure that is why our c ivic leaders in Engle wood
work ed so /rard ,'c :;btain water rights for Englewood-to insure that our quality of fife
would remain high becau se we had enough water /11 the 1970's, Englewood had a 'tlat
ra te " water billing sys tem We paid in advance, and the city ha d a ~table . absolute!;
pre dictab le fund to pa y the cost of providing water. Our lawn s and neighborhoods were
green and inviting. The name · Englewood " seemed to describe our green urban fore st
Now we have wa ter metRrs and we sell nur "P.xcess " w8fer to more affluent
neighborhoods Th e ratio11ate for this wa .'l that by selling our e xcess water, Englewood
wo uld have plenty and our rates would stay lower th;in surroundir,a r:iries
Unfortunately , this hasn ·t wo rk ed out. Denver rate s right now are $2.5911000 ga llons
plus $6.33 odmin fee , Englewaorl's rate is $3.2911000 ga llon s plu s a $9. 71 admin fe e. If
yo u use 10 ,0 00 gallons in a billing period you cay $4.261 1000 gallons in Englewood, vs
$:,.221 1000 g allons in Denver. A s just D side note, if you are one of Fnglewoo d 's ''out o f
i;ity" metered cu stomers, you only pay an admin fee of $9 . 22 . So much for the th oory of
"sell off our water and pay le ss fo r the w ate r we use."
Over the past several de ;ade s, as Englewood 's water policy ha. moved from a flat ra te,
predictable cost to a metered cost, Englewood's nelghboflloods /rav e consisten tly
declined ,n appearance. Certainly a big part of that has been the fact that blu~ grass
lawns are water guzzlers and have become very ex pensive to maintain under the
current water pricing system, and as you :Jrive through th e city you can see numerous
homes with dead or abandoned fawn s , but also fewer gardens and more neglected
tree s. No rationa l person is going to suggest th at we encourage bluegrass lawns, or
run ning water in th e gutter. But our policies are not encouraging APPROPRIATE
il\lA TER USE to Keep Englewood Beautiful. As the appearance of our neighborhoods
continues its decline. so does the de sire to five here . rai se a fam ily, participate in ,;ivic
affairs, and so forth . Our water policies have contributed to this de cline even th ough we
seem to ha ve eno ugh water to lake a more enlightened approach, saving water
ai)propriately, but encouraging water u se that keeps Englewood a n attractive , livab le
city. It is vexing ra me that Englewo0<f 's neighborhoods can 't affo rd th e water that we
arc selling to oth er, more affluen t metro ndighborhoods to waste on THEIR fawns and
green spaco, 1,·,,ich they seem to do with reckle ss ab andon, even to t he point. in
Highlands R f:nch , of p enalizing homeowners who do not use enough water on th eir
ldwns. Obviously, they have recognized .. a t people want to live and do business in a
city whicl1 1,as visually ai)peafing trees, landscaping , and so forth . We apparen1:y
haven 't figwed 1/Jat ou t, even I/roug h we at,eady have tire water re sources .
Obviously, 11'.e cos, ol wat er is a muc/1 s mall part uf a famlly 's budget in a more alfluen t
communily than II is in le ss affluent Englewood. So I see nothi11g in tho prop osed Water
Conservation Plan to encourage the APPROPRIATE USE of the water Englewood
owns to Improve the quality o f the appearance and livability of tl ,e City of E11 9/ewood,
ta king into account that our city is not as affluen t as sa me of our Sou tl1 err1 11eighbor s.
For instance, Englewood ·s de ve lopment guidelines req uir e /Iee s, and our Co11c:e ta
R eplacement plan requires repla cement trees when a tree is remo ve d 11exl lo a
sidewa lk . But our water co nservation plan gives no th ought to the cos t 01 effort i11vol ved
in owning a tre e. or the water required Trees are a11 expensive addition to a
iomeowner 's landscape. The y re au ire watering, maintenance, insura11 ce, trimming, and
p,c bably eventua l e xpensive removal. I gu ess a "co 11 servatio11 mi11ded" c,ti,<111 should
simply do without tree.~ But can you imagine Englewood without trees ' Cert ai11 ly tile
·w oJ d " part refers to our attractive urba n fore st. I imagine th e gro•, ,11g 11umber of
apartm ent awellers in Englewood tee / th at their wa ter ra te should be lo ·er, afte r all /h ey
don 'r have trees, or grass or garden s, or flowers lo tend, water and ma111tai11.
So It i;eem s to me that Englewood h omeowne1s should no t be disadva ntaged 1v/1 e11
compared to apartment dwellers, or to homeo w11 e1s in more affluen t areas lo wh om
Englewoo d sells water . Wh ile a homeowner will probably use more water. mu clt of Illa r
will to enhan ce th e urban landscape, pro viding tree s and landscapmg wli iclt enl,ances
ail of our qu ality of life. There is clea rly a benefit to the co mmunity provided by
llomeow11ers who i11ves l i11 !rees and approp riate land scaping , and a waler conse rvation
program s llourd re cognize I /tis benefit and en courage treas througl, water µrici· ,1 . Tr ee
o wn ership should not be mandated by tlt e City, and th en immec!ia tely pen&!;zed by
Englewood's water pricing policy. Similarly, some thought should be given to th,, social
and comm un ity bene fit pro vided by a ho111eow11 er wh o llds a flower or vPg elable
garden. enhancing Ille beauty of the neighborhood and the lil'ability of IIH w ban
landscape. Th ese gardens slluuld be en co uraged. not penalized by wate r pric in g when
compared lo lite person wl10 only plants a wat er guzzling bluegrass lawn . Again, is r, 'I ii
c urio us I/tat the City of Englewood is now subsidizin g a community garden for people
(apa1tment dwellers) wh? cannot have th eir own garden , but gr ves no break to the
homeowner who owns, pays taxes on, and pro vides /11s own garden area. Additionally,
it is curious I/Ja l th is "Con s ervation Plan " doe sn't seem to encourage, or even lo allow
some inn ovative conservation /e c/1niqu es, such as grey water systems, rain barrels, low
flow toilets, and so forth . Grey wa ler sys/ems should be enco uraged when appropriately
designed and installed. There is no go od reason why bathing or hand wa shing water
cannot be used again for toilet nushm g before it r,a~ses back into th e sanitary sewer
system. This does not affect the amount of water av,Jr1able for re -inlroduc./on back into
11,e rivvr as treated effluent, but will redu ce the amount nee ded lo opera te a household.
Sim,"/a rly, cis ler ns designed t o catch and use rainwater fo r garden or fawn , or household
use hould bo encourag ed and allowed. II Is curious that Englewood ·ctaim s " thac runoff
rain wa ter creates a ,·to rn , d,-a inage burden th at must be remediated th roug h a ta x, but
v11// 1101 allow a homeowner lo catch and use Iha/ rainwa ter, /hereby elimina ting this
storm drainage burden. I lomeowne r s shou ld be encourage d to use low flo w toile ts , low
flow showerhea ds, drip irrigatio n for flo werbeds and ga,dens; if 101 through a rebate
program then at le usl through an educt1t,o n program, classes, pro dL t
re comm endatiuns, and so forth Some co nsidera ble thought sho uld be gi ven lo the
problems faced b y a family lrym g to plan a fa mily budget and the effec t s of a co nstanlly
•
•
•
•
•
•
c hanging waler bill w/1 ic/1 seems to be out of the ir c ontrol. A family should be able lo
predict it s water bill wit h some certainty, even through periods of drought. I suggest that
the city should use a base rate wh ic h co mpletely accounts for the cost of th e system
opera tions, plu s ,; reasona ble amount of wa ter for household use and lanrlscarw1g ;
(wit h an allowa nce for tr~es an1 gardens , as mentioned earlior) and /h e n have a
s urcha rge for excessive u se, an d an even hig her rate for u sa g e tha t rs clearly -,,astefuf
o r abusive . Un der this scenario, a family could reaso nably plan and know its cos ts , Jnd
woula be en co uraged to no/ abu se or waste this water r esource, but wo11/a be
on cour::;ga d to ha ve trees, a garden, flo wers and so forth . The rate paid by apartment
dweller s should take 'n to account that someone else, .'.e . homeowners a nd the City
through ,t s parks, is payin g the co st of the la ndscaping ameni ties, trees, lawn s, and so
forth wnich we all en,oy in this SUBURBAN en vironment In Su mmary, we all know that
wa ste is oad No w we nee d tn recognize that the qualify o f life in Eng/wood, m the
futur e, will bo do terminod by how we allow and enco urage appropria l e use of th 0 wa ter
resources we o wn , a11tl wl,ic/1 we 1,re co11s tanlly ,~minded that are more than adequate.
Our Conse rvatron Plan sh outd plan for no t Ju st wa ter conservation, but sl1ould embrace
innova tive water saving technologies to "stretch " th e wafer we can use, and sho uld
ENCOURAGE THE APPROPRIA TE USE OF WATER , using o ur pricing mechani.~m to
insure that we have the kind of landscaping, trees, gard ens, flowe r:; and w.i tcr offic,cnt
landscaping tha t will "Keep Engle woo d Beautiful" and provide a /1ig/l quality uf life for
our residenfs and businesses.
RESPO SE :
Se e pri or res pons e on "X eriscape Progra ms and Measures ".
Water Rates
There were se veral commen ts pr ovi ded regard ing wa le.! ra tes . One co mment
suggested that the City shou ld use a base rate wl 1ic h accounts to r the cost o f the
sys tem op eratio r.a, pl us a reas onable amount of water for household use and
landsc ping ; (wit h an allowan ce fo r trees and garden s) and th e n ha ve a surcharge for
excessive use, and an e ven higher rate for usa ge that is clearl y wa steful or abu sive .
Inco rporated into th e conservation plan is a future wa ter rate s tud y. The ,tu dy w:11
consi de, all of th e el ements_of th is comment an d dcterr,1ine ii any changes need to be
made to En gle wood 's current w~ter rn te strucli rr e
Public Education
A cou pl e of co mm ent s were provided rega rdin g p b lic educa ti on Based on the City '',
scre ening critc ri ~ {1 stnff ti m,, 2 . r,nan cia l impl icotions ::ind 3, poli ti cal ra mifi ca tions ),
the City does not curre nily have the staff o r ri nancial resources to devote to educa tion al
clas ses . However the plar-. includ es educa l1onal kits . pub lic educati c ~ through
~Iler bil l stutters and the ci ty website on lin c acce ss to wate1 bill and his tory and
dist rib ut ion of ET ;mgation scheduling in wa ter bill . The City v.ill re•P."ah,a tP. P.ducalion
measures an d prog rams with futur e wat er co nserva ti on planning elfon s .
Co mment 3: 1-'ago ES-1. Paragraph 3: tab le l::S 1 would seem to indica te tllat wa ter
uso d should bo 70,677 AF /or are you re ferring to a savin gs ?/. Page 12, reference to
fig 2.4 ; do wo coal/}• chargo less fo r mo ro consumptio n? $2 04 for heavier users vs .
$3 29 for lig hter us ers .. That would seem lo discourage conservation. Page 15,
re ference to fi g 2.5 sl 1ou td be 2.6 /or vice versa).
RESPON SE ·
A comment was made rega rdi ng lhe fac t tha t Englew ood's curr ent ralc str uc tu re
cha rges less per 1,000 ga ll ons for water consumption over 400 ,000 gallon s The
current rate structu 111 r11coq11izes that targ e~..:,...i_i;!.~.n.J,!o not cont ribute to the
pea ki ng cost of the sys tem as much as th e sma ller use rs. It ts 11n tlke iy lh;>.I resi de nts
w,11 reach th e 400 ,000 g allon thr es hold As me nt ioned previously ~ fut ur e wa tP.r rate
stud y wi ll eval uate the cu rre nt water rate s and deter mine ii any ch anges need to be
macj_e J o Englewood 's cu rrent wa te r rate str ucture.
•
Comment 4 : Table 2.2. Where are the Rainfall numbers from ? Englewood, Wat ers hed •
from whero wo go t our wa ter, snowpack, doo s it exclu de our sno wfall. etc.? ... 1 d like
to see a reference . Figu re 2.5. on the Y axis it is really easy to (m entally) put a co mma
where there is a period in th e Y va lu es: I would recomme nd us ing th e nu mber with ou t
decimals (e g. 1000) or with only ona rlacimat (e g. 1000 OJ . ... or j usf 11 se billion gallons
with one decimal. Pretty amazing how water use has gone down /3 bill/o n to 7 billion/
.... Something was really done right to ge t th is to happe n/ Figures 2. 1 and 2. 2 need to
be road.ibte (higher r esolution ?/ Figure 2.2. Engle woo d Water (Main s/Lines ?/ over 8
inc hes in Diameter. I kn ow what you mean but citizen s migh t not.
RESPONSE :
ThA ral nfa ll nu mbers co me from Jh e N.:i tional W P.a th er Sf!rv ice ml1 of Denver lnte rp at1una l
A1rpor1 . Other rer..o mm en(1e c1 r.o rrections :.re hei ng take n int n r.o nsi ri,uM 1on
Comment 5: I've attached a brochure fr om the City of Calgary. Alberta , th al en courages
ro sident, to co ll ect rainwate r for th eir lan dscape water ing. I suggest th31 En glewood
consider this practice. Ottawa. Ontario, Conven tion Centre colle cts ra inwater for toile t
a11rl urinal flushing sa ving 359.000 gallons per year--ano ther prac tica l conserva tion
approach.
•
•
•
•
I appre ciat e /hat th is is a Wa ter Conse,ve/1on f'len but I think it co ncentrn te s too mu ch
on reducing wa ter use Including punitive measures. and not enoug h on efficient use of
th e resource . I believe /he plan should discuss collaboration with other City departments
to achi•ve some o f th e goals For in stan r.a working v. · ·, P arks and Re creation for
educotfon:il scmin:irs ond even gardens and alternative grasses for lawns, or
Commu11ity D eve lopment 10 ac/11eve a balance between landscap111g requirem ents and
water u se
Englewood participa te s in the Arbor Day Foundatio ns Tre e City progra m promoting a
healthy urban fore st Water ploys on essential part in maintaining th ::i t urban forest . Th e
only mention of trees in the entire plan is 0 11 p;,gi: 25 w/,ere it talks about removing
nalive tree species as a wa y of conse,ving wa ter! EMC 16-6-7 detatls reqwred
landscaping standards for new development and agai:1 th is p lan doc sn I really address
the water use issues presented by the se City req uirements.
Public educa tion is an essenltal element if this plan is l o succe6d, bvt aside from the
Pip eline publication, white widely distributed I su sp ect ,sn ·1 wid ely read, there seems to
hP. ti ttle r.lse /11 fact , acr.orrlina to Page ')7 XP.risc ape edvr.alion is left to Denver Water.
Wh ilo th o Wo tor Day for sc hool childre n is a l::iud:,ble program, it is the parents who
111ake 1110s/ o f lite wale, u , de cisiu11 s I would hate to see Cnglewood b11rie d in
mountains o f cru shed rock simply because it require s le ss water.
RESPONSE :
Rainwater Harvesting and Graywater Reuse
There we re a co uple of com ments made regarding ra inwater harvesting and
incorporating th e practi ce in to this pla n Ca pturing rainwater is an ongoi ng issue in
Colorado. and it is not all ow ed if ,t will iniuro vested w ater rights For the most part,
Co lorado la w docs not al low homeow ner to co ll ect or use rainwater runoff from roof s
unless their only source of water 1s a w ell on the property .
In 2009. ho wever , the Colorado State Legislatu re pnssed two laws th at carve out
exemptions from the general rul e. l he first law sa ys that if you arc not sr:,rved by a
dO•'llestlc water system and you are loca ted in a designated ground water basin or you r
coll ection sys te m qua li ti es as exempt fro m 37-92 ·6 02(1 X9XI). you are al lowed lo
r,;ip ture rninw~ter for household fire proleclio r stock watering and lrri m. •ion of up to
one acre of lawns and garden s as long as it is appl ied to us es specified ir ~
ermil that a lies to our ro erty. T he seco nd law allo·Ns the State to part icipate in a
stud y or 10 new developments to determine the impact of captu ·:ng rain water on
st r§mS, rivers and tributary g rou nd wate r.
Ad di tiona ll y a ~ou ple or com ments were mad e regardin g graywater reus e. The term
'.:,graywater mean s disc l1a1ge s from b2.,ni oo111 and laundry room sinks bathtu bs ,
showers. laundry machines and oth P.r sou rces authorized by th e Colorado Water
Qualit y Co nlro l Commiss ion In A,1:;y 2013 the Co lorad o General Asse mbly pa ssfil!
Hou se Bill 1044 which aut ho rizeo ;; ,e use of graywater. Th e maj ority or En glewood 's
wa ter righ ts do not all ow fo r reuse . parti cularl y ,r tha t reuse involves furt her consumption
of the wnt er
See prio r response , "Xeriscape Progra ms and M11asu res"
Comment 6 : Eve ry toilet th af i:; in an Englewood con trolied build ing should be modified
or replaced with low usage one s fire sl afion s, police buildings, co urt houses Englewood
Public buildings, etc all '
RESPONSE :
City Bu ilding Fixtures
A com ment was mad e that every toilet tha t is in an L glewood controlled build ing
sho ul d be mod ified or replaced with low usa ge to ilets. C•,rr en tly as new tv ,1, '· ,•~d
r,x tures are needed ,n ~•ty bu ildings, low wa ter use fixtures a;~ ~sed as a replacement.
•
Comment 7 : "Water Conservalion Plan" Will we keep /he code be /01V ? It do es not •
re quire all fla t rate customers l o be updated. Is /ha t correcl?
RESPONSE :
Metering
Tl1e Eng lewood Mu11iciµi,I Code includes a requ irem ent fo r all fli,t-,i,te customers lo
install approve d water mete rs when th ey sell or transfe r the ir prop erty . The Code
st::i tcs: Al l owners of property havi ng unmc tc rcd water service shall be re qu ired to
install app roved waler meter wi th in ninety (90) day s aft er the sale or transfe r of th e
propert y or change in property use fro m resi c1 ent ia l lo co mme rcial or indus !ri al.
W henever a meter is to be instal led it shall be supplied by th e Englewood Utilities
De~1ent at the owners cost.
Comm ent B: Aft er reading Mr Wou//ard 's artic le in the Hub regarding wa ter
conservation, it really peaked my interest as I am nne of th e 10,00/0} plus hemes on a
war1.1rmel e1
I understand /here are 2,074 single fam ily dwellings unde r the flat rate sys/em, and I am
s ure se veral of these home own ers are trying lo cons erve water. However, there are a
p erce ntage ol lhe se homes tha t are rak in g ad va ntage of th is system. I have a neigh bor
tha t will use one o f the founta in type sprmk te rs They wrll set 1/ in one spot ,~ the •
•
•
•
morning ;inrl it will stilt be in the same spo t in the aftern oon. W/J on confron ted as to why
they would do suc h 11 th ing there comment is "we don 't care we don't pa y for water.· In
addition I drive S Logan to Belleview to and from wo rk every week . The,e a,e a few
houses where the water is on In the afternoons pnor to 6:00 pm I do not know whe ther
these homes are metered or on the flat rate system, r,1ll1er way they should not be
watering during the heat of the day
My opinion is that all sin gle lamily dwelling s sho uld ha ve a meter installed sooner than
la ter
RESP ONSE :
See prior resp0nse, "Metering ."
Mandatory Watering Schedule
A resi den l re que sled Iha ! Eng lewood go lo a man dalory lhree-day-a -week watering
sched ule on a permanent bas is . While 1h1s may be necessary dur ing a wa ler shorlage
or drought , the Ci ty fell !hat a manoa tory lhree-day-a-week wa lering schedu le is nol
1erns5ary to reach lls waler co nse rvallon goa ls
Xerlscape Programs and Measures
A coup le of com menls requested lhe incorpo ral ion of Xerisca pe program s and
in ce ntive s The Cily did cons ide r Xeriscape programs d~r ing lhe 1nilial screening of
poten lial conserval 1on measures an d prograrns . Based on the Cily's scr eening cn l eria
(1 . slaff lirn e, 2 . finan cial irnp li ca lio ns and 3. po lilica l rarnificalions), lh e Cily do"s not
currenlly ~ave lh e staff resources to irnplernenl Xenscape programs and did 11 01 feel l he
programs merited pulling mo ney 1nlo ii. Tile Ci ly will re-e valua le Xer iscape measures
and programs with fulure wa te r co nservation planning effort s. Eng lewood res idents are
encouraged to uli lize Xe riscape landsca pe .
•
Turf and Landscape Restrictions/Standa rds for New Construction •
One er rnmenl requesled that Englewo od limi t lhe amount of grass for new homes and
bu s1ne,ses and requ ir e the use of low water usage g ra sses . En glewood staff
con sidered turf and landscape reslri clions/sta , ,dards for new construction . Based on
!he Ci ty 's screeni ng cri teria ( 1. sta ff li me, 2. fina ncial im plications and 3. po litica l
ramificalions ), the City decided to re-evaluate new co nstru cti on s restric tions and
standards wi th future water conservation pl anning effo rts .
Mandatory Watering Schedule
A reside r.I requested that Englewood go to a mandalory three -<lay-a-11eek water ing
sc hedu le on a perman ent basi s . W hile !his may be necessary during a water shorta ge
or dro ught , the City fell that a man datory lhree-<lay -a-week wa terin g sc hedu le is not
ne cessary to reach it s "'ater conservation goals .
Water Rates
There wer e ~everal comm 1mts pro vi ded regarding water rates One commen t
suggested !hat the City shou ld use a base rate whi ch accounts fo r th e cost of the
system operat ions , plu s a reasonable amount of wa ler for house hold use and
landscaping; (with an allowance fo r tre es and gardens) and th en hav e a surcha rge for
excessive use, and an even higher rat e fo r usage tha t is clea rly waslefu l or abu sive .
Inco rporated inlo th e Co nse rvation Plan is a wate r rate stu dy . The study will consider
all of the elements of !his comment and determine if any cha r.~cs neeli 10 be made to
Englewood's current waler rate str ucture . •
..
•
•
•
One resident was concerned that the City Code rega rdlr ,g Ihe conve rsion of Oat-rate
custome rr to me ter ,d custo:ners was chang ing 10 req ·Jrre fl .it-ra te c ust ,;;,,.,,·s to rnstall
meters . Th e Ci ty Code is not cha noing The E~a !e,•;oo d Me1 ,;i r R~l,,cem enl Program
(EMAP ) di scus sed in th e Plan is vrik:nt ory . EM/IP takes th e ditt em'lce between what
the custo me r pay s for the 11011-mete red rate and wh at the cu stom . wou ld pay for the
metered rate and uses that mon ey to help pay the cost of inst2•li niJ •he wa ter me ter . tr
provide d a gra nt by the CW CB, Englewood wCluld like to expand uI , ll1e;r current
proNam by provi ding 50 to 100 me te ~ a: no co st to the custr,mer wh il e th t. cus!o mer
co r r res to pa y the flat rat e ch arge s, as fu,1he r ince11tive f r me ter re placeme,·t. If the
cc ,r con verts, th e money rece iv ed by It1e Ci ty wou ld yo to pro vit rr,g a md ter for
·r r flat ra te customer.
1 "" Crty wou ld like lo respond to ;,n ina ccu ra cy re garding Eng lew,,od's wa ter rat es as
com pared lo Den ve r's wa ter rates . The com ment state s t~at Denve r nles are
S2.5911000 gallons pl us $6 .33 ad min ft,e. Engtewood ·s 'ate i~ $1 ,91 1 ooo gallons plus a
$9 . 71 admin fee . Accordin g to the res ident , if you use 10 ,000 gallo"• in a t>i'iing pe'.iOd
you pay $4 .261 1000 ga ll ons in Englewood , vs $3 2?11000 ga ll ons in t, m,.->r. H0weve r ,
the calcu lat ron did not co nsrder that Denver Wa ter bill $ mo nthly whil e Engro wood bil ls
on a quar l,:rly basis. If we e xami ne a scena rio in which one uses 10,000 gallons per
month for a three -mon th per iod, an Eng lewood re sider\ wou ld pay $3 .6111,000 gallo ns
as compa red to $3 .22/1,000 gall on s rn Denver .
A com ment was made rega rd ing th e fac t that Englewood '$ current rnte stru ctu re
charge s less per 1,000 ga ll o n~ for water consum ption over 400 ,000 gall ons . The
cu rrent rate str uctu re is an incent ive lor rndustry and large wate r us ers and rt rs unlrkely
that residen ts will rea ch th e 400 ,000 gall on thres ho ld . As me ntioned previously, a water
ra te stud y wi ll eval uate tne current water rates and determin e if any changes need to be
made to Eng lewood's cu rrent water rate structure.
Rainwater Harvesting and Graywater Reuse
Th ere were a couple of com ment s madP. regard ing rainwate r h;a rve sli ng ;and
in corporating the practice in to this Plan . Cap turing rainwater is an ongoing issu e in
Colorado , and it is no t all owed if it will injure ves ted water righ ts. For th e mos t pa rt ,
Colorado law does not allow homeowner to collect or use ra1 mva ter runoff fro m roo f
unless their on ly sou rce of water is a well on the property.
In 2009 , however , the Colorado Sta te Legislature pa ssed two laws that carve out
exe mptions from the genera l ru le -The fi rst law says thal if yo u are not served by a
domes tic wa ter sys tem and you are loca ted in a designated gro und wa ter basin or yo ur
co ll ection sys tem qua lifies a s ex emp t from 37 . ;2-b02 (1)(g)(I). you are allowed to
ca pture rainwater for nouse hold , fire pro tection , stock wateri ng and irrigation of up to
on e ac re of law ns an d gardens as long as it is appli ed to u ses specif ied in th e we ll
permrt th at ap plies to you r pro pe rt y. The seco nd law allows the State to part icipate in a
stu dy of 10 new de ve lop me nts to det ermin e the imp acI of ca pturing rainwater on
streams , riv ers and tribu tary groundwa 1er .
l\dd1t1o na1ly a cou pl e of com ments were made reg ardin g graywater re use The term
··graywater" means di sc harges from bathroo m and la undry roo m sinks. bathtubs.
showers. lau ndry n~achines and othe r sou rces aulho,1zed by the Co lorado Waler
Quali ty Co ntrol Co mm1 ss 1on . In May 20 13. th e Co lorado General Assembly passetl
House Bill 1044 , which au th orized th e use ol g raywa ter The majori ty of Englewoo d 's
water righ ts do not allow fo r reuse , pa rt icularly if that re use involves furth er consumption
o r 111 0 wat er
Public Education
l\ cou ple of comment s were provided regarding pub lic r.ducauon . Based on l~e C1 1y·s
_,c;ree ning cn1 0 na (1 staff tim e, 2 fina ncia l ,mr lication s and ~ roll lical r.a mifi i:;i11ons),
thP. Cit y rtoe s not cu rr ently have lhe staff re sources 10 dP.vo le 10 edur.a tlona l cla sses
However , the Plan indudes educational kils, pub lic educa tion throu('h newsle tt er, bill
sluffers and the Ci ty We bsite , o nh ne access l o water bill and his tory and di stribut,o n of
ET Irr iga tio n sched uling In water bil l The City will re -eva luate edu cation measu re s and
program s with fur ure water conservation pla nn ,no eff ort s
City Building Fixtures
A co mment was mad e lhal eve ry toilet thal Is in an Eng lewood co ntroll ed bui ldi ng
should be mod ified or replaced with low usage toilel s. Currenll y, as new toilets an d
fix tu re s a re ne.xJe d in C!l y building s, low wate r use nx1ures a re usf'd as a replacement.
•
•
•
.. ,, .
•
Water Rate C0mparl1on •
Englewood YI, Denyer
'BaHdan:
• Slngle•lamlly re1ldenll1I
• Size ¾ Inch mtltr
Auumptlon1:
• 1201000 Gal Total Annual Con1umptlon
• 1,000 Oal par month for t month•
11,000 Gal per month for 3 month ■ (Summer)
Category (Avorogo Month) ENGLEWOOD
Service Charge S 3.24
Consumption Coat $32.110
Total monthly BIii S36 ,14
Anumptlona:
150,000 Gal Totol Annual Con11N11ptlon
10,000 Gal por month ~.ort monlhl
• 20,000 Gal per month for 3 month• (SUmmar)
~-
Category (Avorao• Month) ENGLEWOOD
Strvlct Charge S 3.24
Conaumptlon Cost $41 ,12
Total monthly BIii S44.36
DENVER
(lnalde)
SG.33
$29 .14
535 .47
-$0.87 dlff.
DENVER
(lnalde)
$8.33
$38.20
$44 .53
+ S0 .17 dill .
DENVER
(Outalda)
$6.33
$32 .111
$39.29
+ $3.15dlff.
DENVER
(Outside)
$6.33
$43 .22
$49.55
+ S5.19dlfl.
City of l!nglewood
AGENDA ITEM 10 (a)
L~YI.Lf¢jteARING .ROJ.TI:~-./
DATE : September 16, 2013
A public hearing to ,Jather Input on the
~oqqatcl 2014 ~lfy _o! j _ng(!wood Budget. ___ :'
f~!-:1:AI~ P.BINT /
NAME ADDRESS
Ci1y of F.na lewood . Colorado
2014 Proposed Budgot O,·cn·lc"'
COVF.RNMENTAL FUND TYPES
January I,
2014
~stimatNi
Dalancc
Sources of
f'unds Use! ofF1111ds
December 3 I,
2014
Eslil1\3ted
Balance
General Fund is the operuti,,gfu11d o/ll1e Cif)1• /1 is u.,ed 10 account for allflnwidal rrJsources cx~pt for
those required to be accnumed in anotl,cr fund.
General fund 8,726,47◄ 40,818,932 42,023,476 7,521,930
Special Revenue Fundi; llC'cm1m for tha proceeds of specific re'i!em1t! :wurc:e.\· that are legally re.flricted ,o
,xpendi,ure f or spcc{lied purposes.
Conservation Trust S8,952 310,000 337.000 61.952
Commu1it2· Ocnloement 350,000 350,000
Dono(s 218,096 90,000 242,680 65,4 16
Mall••· Cenlfr Trust 244,474 7,000 75,UOU 176,474
Parks and Rccrcalion TruSI 455,947 16,300 365,000 107.247
.Ql!•n·seiic:c 196,630 665,000 805,630 ~6.000
Neighbo ~ood Stabiliz.1t lon Prosrum
Debi Sen•ice s;-uad accom:u far the accumulatio11 and paymelll of lm,g-tt•rm debt principal and imerest
mher thu11 Jong•tl!m1 debt o,;coumed f or ,,, emerprise f1mdt .
General Obll111iun Boad Fund 38.712 1,101,000 1,106.963 J81749
Capital Projecl Funds a,·,·orml fur financial resources 10 be used fi,r the uc::,11,isltl<, • a11d/or construction of
majorcapitalfocilitie,i; (mlwr tlum those fimmcetl by propri'1taryjimds or rpeciol "t'\.-mu11fu11ds).
Public lmprovemeni 1.001,427 3.009,000 3,190.820 819,607
Capital Project• 78,282 1,ISl,000 l,ISl,97S 79,J07
PROPRIETARY FUND TYPF.S
Enlerprise Funds acco1 'II for opermlons fl11a11ced and operated m c, manner similar to priva1e business
enterprises.
Waler 10,793 ,233 ~176,m 11,655,1 JO 8,214,208
Stllo'tr 1,134,620 17,414,011 17J46,403 1~02.228
S&orm OrainRae 972,029 333 ,122 323 ,736 981,4 IS
Coif Course 599,441 2,241,398 2,626,498 214,341
Cuncn:I~ U1ill1l 338,371 ~M,200 872,162 J50,4()Q
Hnusln& Rehabilltolion _750,019 1,000,000 1,000,000 750.019
Internal Sen-Ice Funds ut:,:r Ju,u f ur tlw jlnm1ci11g of good! or services provide</ by one deparrmem or
agenc.,1 ro oilier departments or agencit!s of the go,·ernment, mJtl 10 mher gni;ernmental units, 011 a cost
re;mbursement basis.
Cen1ml Ser,iccs !52.509 J88.400 429.699 JI 1,210
S.rviC,nter 1,1117,20.l 2,561,160 3,290,180 458,183
Caeital Eguiement ReeJ3ccmcnt 1,658,730 1,026,894 1,760,066 925 ,558
Risk Mana1ement 316,)37 1,◄4l,76S 1,443,774 315,128
Emplovee BenefilS fund 1,961 6,115,186 6,115,998 1.149
All funds Tolal 28.953.247 90,009.453 96.412.170 22.550.530
•
•
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
Englewood Herald
I, Loucrishia A Ellis, City Clerk , for the City of Englewood, do solemnly swear
that lhe attached legal notice (Notice of Public Hearing September 16, 2013
on 2014 Proposed Budget) was published in the Englew-"od Herald on August 28, 2013
through September 16, 2013 .
State of Colorado
County of Arapahoe
ss
Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 16th day of September, 2013.
My Commission Expires : U-!Ji · ZO/b--
SEAL
KERRY bu~r1
NOTARY P\JSUC
STATEOFCWlAADC)
NOTARY ID 1-18041
MY COMl,i,S&i0N CXPIRES NOVEM!lEA 8 , · '··· __ ,
I ..
_._ ...
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
on 2014 Propoaed Budget
SEPTEMBER 18, 2013
Notlee la hereby given that the City
Council of tha City of Englewood,
Colorado will hold a Public Hearing
on tha 2014 Propond Budget on
Monday, SEPTEMBER 1'6, 2013, at
7:30 p.m., In the City Council
Chambers at Englewood Civic
Center, 1000 Englewood Parkway,
Englewood, Colorado. The purpose
of the hearing Is to recolva eltlzan
Input concerning the 2014 Proposed
Budget
Interested parties may express
opinions In person at the Publlc
Hearing, or In writing, to be received
by tha City Clark by 5:00 p.m. on
September 18, 2013. Anyone wishing
to speak at the Public Hearing may
call the City Clerk's Office,
303.782.2407 or 303.712.2405, to
schedule their presentation or a sign-
up sheet will be available at tha door.
By order of the Englewood City
Councll
Loucrlahla A. Ellis, MMC
City Clerk, City of Englewood
10D0 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, Colorado 80110
PUBLISHED: August 28, 2013
Official Website of the
City of Englewood, Colorado
State of Colorado
County of Arapahoe
AFFIDAVIT OF
PUBLICATION
)ss
This Affidavit of Publication for the Englewood Hera Id, a weekl 1 ·•wspaper. printed
and published for the Counly of Arapahoe, State of Cclorodo, hereby cert ifies that
the a't.ached legal nolice was published in said newspaper once in each week , tor 3
succo5~i vc wock(c), tho lasl or which publicalion was made the 13th day of
Sept ember A.O ., 20 13, and that copies of each nurrber ot said paper ,n whicr said
Public Notice was published were delivered by ca rri ers or tran~mitted by mail to
each of the subScnbers ol &a id paper . according to their accustomed mode or
'siness in tiis omce.
~
for the Engte.,ooo Herald
State of Colorado )
County of Arapahoe )SS
The above Air.davit and Cerjificate o; Publication was subscribed and sworn lo
before me by the above named Gerard Healey , publishe r of said newspaper, who
is personally kr.own to me to be the identical person m lhe above certificate on this
13th day of September A.O .. 2013 .
My Comm ission Expires 06111/16
• /JIIBJWUJ:
~Ubllc Nolle,
CITT' Of DIRLIWOOD
N(r.lC(! o, ~•uc Hll:AAJNQ
onNU4 .PrvsiONtl ......
riEPffMllill 1" Mt3
A:IJ/~t/£1" .:h1 ;'013
5f.P(c-M lg,t;,R,_. &;, 1 .)d.3
5!Ptlt/fJ Y..fd... /~ . .2/JI 2,
City of Englewood
AGENDA ITEM 10 (b)
PUBLIC HEARINO ROSTER
DATE : September 16, 2013
A public hearing to gather input on Council Bill No. 21, approving the
proposed Navajo Apartments Planned Unit Development.
~LEASE PRINT
NAME ADDRESS
CUl'nmunlty Media of Colorado
•
State of Colorado
County ol Arapahoe
AFFIDAVIT OF
PUBLICATION
)ss
Th is Affidavit of Publication for the Englewood Herold, o weekly newspaper, printed
and published for the County of Arapahoe, Stale or Cotoraco, hereby certifies llull
lhe attached 1egal notice was published in sa id newspapor once in each week, lor. 1
successive wee <{~). the last or wllic;h pubUcat1on was made the 6th day of
September A.O .. 2013, and tha t copies or each number of sald_,p~por in which said
Public Noti ce was pub li chod were delivttred by c:1rriers or lranSmi,tted by niail tq ·
each or Iha subscribers of said paper, according tu /he ir accusto~~ mode of
business in lhiR offce
for the Englewood Herald
Slale or Colorado )
County of Arapahoe )ss
I
The abova Affidavit and Certificate of Publicati on was subscribed and sworn lo
before me by lh• above n~i],~d Ger~rd Healey, pii'blisher of said nP.wsp.,per, who
is pers onally known to me lo '\M\~e' identi~I person in the above c~rtJflcate on 1h:s
6th day of Seplemb,r A.O., 20)3.
M~ Com1111sslon Expires 06111 116
No1er"f Public,
•
Ptrbl11:,-11c.
CfTYOFEHQt.ew.:IOO
NOTICE OF PUIUC HUlt!NO
~1t.Jt1J
....... ~...., ... ltltCtf»
c.._~hCHtofl........_, === ....... IVlalaai...,,..1.a1 •: T:Jtp.a.•lfltettrc.unc:u ~°' ......... Chtc
C...,,t11Da....__,__,,ID
...._""*"-"•nC.U.,111• No. Zt, • WI fret an Mftu,_ =~~...,. ---,., .................. .. .,.,.......,.,.., .......... .. _., __ Cllr_., ...
,...,...,..,....,, ... ,1 :-=.....:,-::.::; ..
C....._CJIIM.)11,Nl,z.toltr
alJIIUID7•achNulthir =.4:'.:::_:, ....... .,_., ... _...,_
•~-.,,..,c Cllr .......... _ , .. ........, ..... .,
~C ...... IIOtM
~::t!=::::.,_ IS, 20 1:I
~~£~~,.:;.:,ll
•
•
•
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
City of Englewood, Colorado
Official Website
www.englewoodgov .org
I , Loucrishia A. Ellis. City Clerk , for the City of Englewood, clo solemn ly swear that
the attached legal notice (Notice of Public Hearing on September 16, ;,•013 on the
proposed Navajo Apartments PUD) was published on the Official City of Englewood
Website from September 4, 2013 through September 16, 2013 .
State of Colorado
County of Arapahoe
ss
Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 161h clay of September 2013 .
My Commission Expires: (I . Df ZD/ b
SEAL
l<ERRYBUSH
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COUlRADO
NOTARY ID 1996401804I
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES t«>VEMBSIB. m,e
•
•
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
September 16, 2013
Notice la hereby given that the City
Councll of the City of Englewood,
Colorado, haa scheduled a Publlc
Hearing at a Regular City Councll
Meeting on SEPTEMBER 16, 2013, at
7:30 p.m. In the City Councll
Chambers of Englewood Civic
Center, 1000 Englewood Parkway, to
gather publlc Input on council BIil
No. 21, a blll for an ordinance
. approving the propoaed Navajo
Ap11rtmenta Planned Unit
Development. lnteraated parties
may express opinions In person at
the Publlc Hearing or In writing to be
received by the City Clerk by 5:00
p.m. on September 16, 2013.
Anyone ~lahlng to speak at the
Publlc Hearing may call the City
Clerk's Office, 303,762.2405 or
303.762.24\17 to schedule their
presentl\ilon or a sign-up sheet wlll
be avalfable at the door.
By order of
the Englewood City Council
Loucriahla A. Ellis, MMC
City Clerk, City of Englewood
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, Colorado 80110
PUBLISHED: September 4, 2013
Offlclal Website of the
City of Englewood, Colorado
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
DATE : Seplernber lo, 2013 AGENDA ITEM : SUBJECT: Navajo Apartments Planned Unit
10b Devel opment (PUD) Public HearinH
INITIATED BY : STAFF SOURCE : Brook Bell, Planner 11
~lsey l',,rtners, LLC
1532 ColleB• Avenue F19
Manhauan, Kansas 66502
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Council approved d1e Nava jo Apartmen ts Planned Unil Developm~nt (PUD) on first reading September 3, 2013
and schedul ed a Public Ht!min g fo r Scptcrnbcr 1 G, 2013 to J:Fllhcr publk: in p ut on lhc proposed PUD.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Stafi recomrne11d s that Coun cil consider test im ony duri ng the PL1blic H earing on Council Bill No. 21, ,1 pprovins
lhe \lav ajo Apartments PUD .
• RACK ,~ROlJNI)
•
Th,~ subjecl propert y of thi!. ,>UD is loca led m id-bl or:k on th e 112 00 block of So uth Navajo Street between
Oxfo rd Avenue to the north and Quincy Avenu e to the soulh . The ;>roperty is approxim ately eoo feet south of
RTD\ Oxfurd LigH R,,il Sldliu11 . L.uuJ tu lh~ ?,UtJlh ,111tl ~d~t uf th~ ?,Ulijt!l:I µrup~rtr is t unt!d 1-·1 Lighl hu..lU?,lrial
District and contains industrial usts. Land to the north o f the propert)· was recently rezoned to the Oxford
Stat ion I ransil Oriented Uevelopment PUU wh ich will include 25 2 res id ential apartmenl units with an option for
mixed commercial uses. Land directly to tile wes! oi the subject proper!)' cor ta ins th e BNSF r,ilroad tracks and
RTD Light Rail tracks and is not w i ti :in the City of Englewood limits.
l"he subject property is owned by th e dC'velopc:r's father Bruce Elsey. Th e site WilS the former location of hi s cat
liner manufacturing comi:,1ny which ha~ since relocated to J larg er faci lity h no rt hwest Engle•,yoo d . Current!)', J
manufacturer of o ut door b!eachers is le,1s ing the existing warehouse building and rema •·,der of the property. Th e
devel oper (E lsey Pa1t 11ers) beli eves th a t tlii;: sitc'!i µro xirn ity to liie Oxfo,J lighl Rdil 51 ,a tiun nldkes the pruµ~rt y
an excellent candidate for a resi dentia l apartment complex. Th e developer foresees young p rofessionals working
downtown a nrl students allending Arapahoe Community College or the Aur.iria campus as potentia l renanls.
In rhe iall "· 2012 , the Elsey Partn ers came forward with a proposal lo construe! betwoen 130 and 180
apa,lment units on th e 2.09 acre pr, ?erl)•. Mulli-unil dwellings .ire not permiued in the 1-1 Light Industrial Zone
Distric t; ther efore , th e developer bee.in lh e process of ,equestinc a rezot'inc to c1 F=i.J D tn accommodate th e
residen tial use .
PUD OVERVIEW
A Planoed L:nit Development establishes specific zoninc and • , planning crite ria 10 meet the needs of a
speci fic dev•lopment proposal that may not hP. ar.r.nmmodated w hin exlsllng zoning development regulations.
PUUs provide the oppo rtunit1• for unified d ev•lopment control for multiple properties or multiµle u,es.
lhe proposed Navajo Apartments PUD would allow a maximum ul 146 residential apartmenl units on the
property, although the current buildinH plan slu,ws 141 units. The majority oi the park ing would be on the
surface with • port,011 of the parkinK bein~ l ucke~ umlemealh the second story of the building !podium style).
Tl1e l,u;luin~ is sel close 10 S0l1lh Navajo Street so th.i most of the parking is on th e sides and rear oi the
proµt:rty . The Sile Pla1, includes two interior courtyards, perimeter landscaping. and interio r parking lot
landsc aping. All new and existins utililies within th e properly and abtil!ing ri ght-0f.way would be place d
undarsround.
Architectural Characlcr: The p roposed PUD contain s archilectur,11 ch.ir.icter s1andards lh at require building
pl ,,ne ch.anges every SO feet, a mix of pattern and color chances , ;, minimum 30 perc:Pnl masonrv requiremen t,
and a requirement tha t buildinc enl rie !.-be cl,:i;uly drfinP<i wilh ilfchilrclu ra l elemen ts . It should be noted 1ha1 lhe
conceptual buildinc foolprin1 ~hn\vn on thP Sile Plan and the proposed bu ilding eleva 1ion!. are subjec1 10
c;ungP; howe ver, any r :langes would have io meet the Design Standc.rds and Guidelines oi 1hc PUO.
l'em1itted Uses: The subject property lies within the ,.1 Li~ht lndu;tri,I Zo11e Dist,ic l. The exi stin~ 1-1 Zone
Olslrlct all ows various im.lu!»tr ial dlld co n1111ercial uses; however, most resiJential us es a·e not permitlec.J. lhe
µroµusttd PUD Dhti'ic.1 Pl -01 includes a table o f allowed uses that liMs lhe pem1it1ed reside·uial. comn,ercial, and
indusll'ial uses. Some of the less desirable uses in the commercial a nd industri.11 c.>lcr,ori cs !ouch o1s Jdult uses ,10d
auto orienlcd us~s hav e been ornit1ed from the lable of allowed uses in the PU D. Some of 1he more intensive
induslrial uses have il lso been orr.itted from the: t~blc. It should be noled that all permilled industrial uses must
cease once a Ccrtliic,,tc of Occup,uicy for 1ny residenlial or commercial use ii; issued for :iny portion of the
property.
Dimensional Standards: The fO,l owinc IJble provides ,1 compari~o n helwee n lhe proper:ts r.xisting 1-1 zone
c.lassitlcatio n and the proposPci 1-Jt II).
!COMPARISON OF OIMENSIONAL REOI/IKEMENTS FOR PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES!
M in Max Lot Min I Max Minimum Setbacks (ft)
lot Max FAR Coverag Lot H. h
Area Width I ••B t I Each I (sq ft) e(%) (fl) (ft) Front Side Rear
1-1 I histing Zoning)
Where a building abuls
upon, adjoins, or is
adjacent 10 a resldenllal
,n Allowe:~ ione districl, minir11u111
Ll:es None 2 :1 None None None setbacks of 10 ft on all
sides are required, except
as required in Sect ion 16-
6-7.K, 'Sc reening
Requ irements .•
•
!COMPARISON OF OiMENSIONA~ REDUIREMENTS FOR PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE!j
I ---~----
Min Max Loi Min Max Minimum Setbacks (ft)
Lot Max ,R Coverag Lot Height Area Width Each
(sq ft) e(%) (fl) (fl) Front Side Rear
Navajo Apartments PUD !New ZoninKl
623 S4 ft µ~r Ullil
Residenlial Uses or iO units per None Po None 75 5 25 25
acre
Public/lnst11u1lona Max
None None None None 100 c,f O lo 0 5 I Uses 5 feel
Max
Commercial Use; None None None None 100 of o to 0 5
5 feet
Where a building abulS
ln<iustri;tl l hies upon, adjoins, or is
{Usesstmset if adjacent to a resi d ential
,my,,cw zone di~trict, mh,imum
re,iden:ia l o r "'one 2:1 None None 100 selhacks of 10 fl on all
commercia l sides are required, except
deve!opme11t as rcaulrcd 111 Section ·t 6•
occurs.) 6-7 .K, "Screening
-~e<1l1irements,"
Rcsidcntiill Density: The proposed N..i vajo Apilrtmcnts PUO woJld permit ,1 m.,ximu,n of 146 units on the 2.09
ac1e p,operty; this rep;esenls a densily of iO .O dwelling unils p er acre. The PUD o nly calls for 141 u,its at 1his
time. For comparison purposes, the recemly re zoned O xford S1ation Transit Oriented Deve:oprnent PLD directly
north of lh ts site will include 25 1 rcs idc nlial apartment urnls on lhe .i.50 acre 1uoperty; lh is represents a density
of 71.9 dwelling units per acre .
Setbacks: A ~e tb,,ck is th e ru lnim111r: distanc e a stru cture must be lo ca ted fwm a pro p e rly li ne. The propo!--ed
PUO'!; sctb,1cks for rc~idc nlial uses .1,c as follows:
rront · 5 feet
Side -2 5 feel
Rear -z, feet
Public/lnslitutional Uses and Co mmercial Uses will iollow rhe se tbacks oullined for the MU-6-1 Zone Dis 1rict.
Industr ial Us e s will iollow the setbacks outlined for 1h e 1-1 Zooe District.
Building Height: n,e m.,ximum buildini; heights ir. lh e PUD ,,re based on lhe a,·e r,1ge elevation of 1he finished
grade ,,1 1he corners oi th e building, lo th e hi@hest point of lhe bu,lding or slruclure. The ma,imum allowed
building heigh1 for residen1ial uses Is 75 feel, ahhough 1he PUD drawings label the building height as being+/•
bU ieel. The maximum allowed building height within the PUD for Pu blic/lns1i1utional Uses, Commercial Uses,
and lnduslri,11 Uses is 100 feet. II should be noted that The Unified Development Code {UDC) has no maximum
height limit in the s1andard !-I Zone District.
Bulk Plane: The bulk plane 1hat rc~ula1es building moss is o iunclion of required sel~Jcks and maximum building
•
heish1 for each type of use. Sheel .~200 of the PUD drawings illustrate projected ,hadows for the p ro posed
apartmenls during 1he winrer and summer solstice as well as the fall equinox.
rarking: The UDC 1eql1irl'!s 1.5 parking spaces ior each un11 with less than 3 bedrooms, plus 1 gues1 spilc~ for
every 5 units. The proposed Navajo Apartments PUD requires 1 parking space for each uni~ plus 1 guest space
for every 10 units. The applicant believes that the Oxford Light Ra il Station (approximately 800 feet north) will be
utilizad by tenants of the apartment complex re<ultlng in fewPf ;>erso,al vehicles. Tile applicant also states they
have conducted parking studies on similar properties with similar parking ratios and note thdt the lots are 0111 v
60% full. for comparison purposes the Oxford Statio11 Transit Orie11ted Development PUD directly north of the
site also requires 1 µc1rking space (or edch unit, bul has guest space ralio of 1 space for every 5 uniu.
The UDC requires bicycle parking at a rate of 1 bicycle space ior every 2 units . The p•oposed Navajo
Apartment5 PUD requires ; bicycle !ipace for every 5 L:nits to bP. .:irr:ornmoc'ialetl with bike racks. The ,1pi lcanr
stales that many tenants will prefer to store their bicyde inside, 1heir .1partment or in 1he 24 storage units that will
be available to them.
Traffic: A traffic irnpctct study wits performed for th'? proposed N.1vajo Aparlmenl~ PUD. The study area
encompassed the O,tford Avenue and Na\lajo S1reet intersection .lS well as the Oxford Avenue and Santa Fe
Drive interseclion . The traffic impact study takes inlo il<"Co11n1 thP. rpomt ~pproval · Oxford Stalion Transil
Oriented Development PUD directly north of the subject property. The traffic impact study also takes 1ntu
account lhe proposed development's close proximlly to the Odom Li1ihl Rail S1a1io11 dnd applies a 20 percent
reductiu11 i11 uip gem:rdtio11 io, lhe N.wajo Apartmenls project. This reduction is laken because of lhe likelihood
of trnnsit use from a transit oriented development; the 20 percent is considered a co11serva1h1e reducllon.
The lro1ffic imp;-1ct study indk~tes that the Uxforrl Avenue ilnrl !,;11,1;1 Fe Drive inter~ectiOn currently has an overall
peak hour level of serv,ce (LOS) of D . n,e Oxford Avenue and Navajo Street intersect·on currentl\' has an overall
peak hour level oi service (LOSI o f 8.
After the approved Osford Station and the propo,ed Navajo Ap.>rtment, PUD projects ore construcled (20151, •
the traffic sludy shows an increase in over.ti! traffic volume from 1he :wo projects; however, an.1lysis of h111.rP.
traffic conditions shows thai. the additional traffic volume is nol expec:1eci to create ,l discernible impact to traffic
npern.uon!> 11, the surrounding 1.:--adway system . For 2015, the 1ralfi:: stud)' indicates 1ha1 the Oxford A\lenue and
Sama Fe Drive in1ersectlon and the Ox(ord A\lenue and Navaj o Slrcel i111~,s~1..lio1, will Lu111i11ue to have ove,all
p~ak huur levels o' seovice of (I.OS) of D and IJ respectively.
The !itudy Jre,1 roadways arc currenlly co11str\1cted to 1heir ultimate cross -sec1ion o1nd the :raffi,: StL1dy does riot
recommend any modification5 at this time. The existinc inlerseclinni; are projecterf to nperatP. ;it flllure levels of
!-ervir:~ c:nmparahle to ex1sling condilions durinb peak traffic hours. The uafiic irnpac1 swdv was revie·.\'ed by 1he
Public Works Traffic Division and COOT, rmd both r~\'it!wers t:u111::urr cd wilh ils fi11di11gs.
Signage: The proposed FUD will follow the signoge regulations fo, :he MU-B-t Zone District outlir-•:! in 16-6-13
of the UDC .1s amended, exr.cpt that the PUD would permit the ma'l(imum heisht a prujcct,ng sign to be 55 feet
high rather th an the UDC's m ,»imum heicht limit of 25 feet.
landscaping: The UDC requires that a minimum of 8%-10% of a property be lanusc•µed 111 the I• 1 Zune
District. Further, lhe UDC requires 1lia1 a minimum ol 20% ol llie properly be landscaped for multi-unit dwellings
in the MU·B· 1 zone district The N,wajo Aparlmenli PUO proposes a minimum of 15% a( the property be
landscaped. The LDC also requires th.11 ,1 minimum o( 70% of the required l.1ndscape be "li\ling" landscape. The
Navajo Apartments PUD site plan proposes thal 73 °/, of the required 15% m inimum landscape be "livin5". lhe
non~ivin3 areas include ;1 lliiynthPtir 111rf dog run and the mlerior courty•rd w ith a pool. The PUD requirements
exceed the reculatioos of the UDC fc;1 multi-unit dwellings in the MU•R -1 Zone D istrict in terms of tr•• dnu
shrub quantities. •
~t;crecning and Fencing: The PUD proposes to screen 1he p1!r1meter parking lots wi th a 5 to 6 fool wide buffer
9'of shrub pl,lnlings and Jt:.:d Uuuu) tr~i:s . 011 tlu: 1101th p1 ope1 1y line, the Oxfo ,d Sldtiun PUD wlll Ut: t..un~tru~thtM
a 6 foot hii;h privacy fence between their project and the r,roposed Navajo Apanments PUD . The propeny to
the south of the Navajo Apartment s PUD has an exi~tin g warehouse building ccnstructed right on the shared
proper:y il ne such th.11 fenc ing I$ .ot necessary .
Drainage: The proposed DrainaAe Plan and Preliminary DrainaAO Report w ere re viewed and approved by th e
Cit )"s Public Works Department .
Parle Oedicalic,n: Th e subdivision regulations of the UDC require the dedication of park ftmd o r p a yment of a
iee In lieu of dedication for ,1 II re!.ider1tial developmenls. The LJDC provide!. a rreth od for determining the
illllowlt 1.>f lc-md to be dcdic.ltcd based on th e numbt'r of unih and the number of llC\.\' rc,ldon ts th al will be
gener.llcd. 8,lSed o n th e proposed 141 multi•l!nil dwellings, th e proposed N,l'w·,1j o Apa,tm c"ts PUD wuuld
,~4uirc a µdrk dtdiLatiu11 uf 2.72 i1cres oi land or pay:mmt ol a it!t! in lieu uf l a11U dt'd'.cdtio11 .
Un September 4. 2012 <..1ty louncil adopted a 1ee to be paid in lieu of dedtc,tion atn (1unl ot $W.OOO per
,eq uired Jere . Credit towards the dedication requirements for recrea lional amenities provided 0 11 -si l e by the
developer and waivers o( all or a portion o( the rem ai ning fe e-in -li eu may be reque sted. Requests .ue con sider ed
on .1 ca se~Jv-c ase basis it t the discreti on ot Council. Counci l \V tll be con sid ering 1hc f1ni1 I fce -in -li el1 of d ed ic ation
am ount concurren tly or shortly after approval of th e PUD .
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CON SIDE RATIONS
Th e UDC requires lhi\t Council shall only 11pprove .J proposed PUD if it fi 111Js thi.11 th ~ p ,o µu:,~d Ut:vduµ111t!11t
•
curuµli~s wilh itll applicab le use, dev e lopme111, an d design sl,mdarcb Ih,u .ue 11 01 olhel\vis t mo difi ed o r w,1lvcd
according 10 lh e rezoning approval; and 1he proposed rezo nir;g meets one of the ki llov,,ing cru er ia,
a . Thitt 1h r: propmecl development will exceed the clcvelopmerll quallty st..11ld,1rdi, iev~ls u l p1,1bl1c ,1 mEm 1t1 es, ur
le \•e/s of c!cs,gn innovation othervvise app/Jcable unde r t/11 s "f11/e, a11d would nn l be oosslblc or pra cticab:e
under ~1 s1a11cJ,vd zone district tir'1 conditional uses or vdth a re ,uon,1ble 11w11/Jer of 2011,ng V,11 i,11u.:e, or
Administrati\le ,\diustm ent5; o,
The pro1,ased PUD will exceed the development quality standards req 1.i 1ed by th e UDC fo r industrial
development as follows :
• The exist ing 1-1 Zone District allows more intensive land uses rh an 1hc proposc.•d N,w.1jo Aprirtmcnt5
PUD . The existing 1-1 Zone Dislrict has le'Ss res tricliv e setbacks, height !imita1i o 11 s, tmd ll!ndsi:aping
req ui1 emen1S than Ihe propo~ed FUD.
• The UDC has no require .. ~nts for buildings in an existing I• I Zone l)1s:ric I ,,s f,,r i1S : bu 1ld1n u
arttcJlation, variety of materials, building transpa·ency, or MChilcc1ur,1l ch,uacter The PUD propcses
a grea ter le\'el of building arlicula ti on includin g: ,1 3 foo l mi nimum bulldlng pl .1 11e clhlnge every SO
feet, a mi:< oi pattern and color changes, ,, rninimum 30 pe,cenl masonry requirmnen1 1 ,1nd cl e.1rlv
defined building entries.
b . 1'h.11 1/i e property c,1nnot he developr.d. or tlic1t no re:1sonablc cnu,orn ic LIU.• of tl w propert)' c.1t1 be achieved,
under t'1e e'(isu'ng zoning, even through t/,e use of co11ditio11,1/ us es o r a ,eason,1fa le number of l.onJng
Vtlri.1nces or Administr,uive Adjustments.
In addition to thP. two Pl,1nned Unit Developmen l cum,iJt:!r dliurni dLvvc, tli t.' UOC rt•quirt!!:I th.ti" µruµt:rly
rezunt!d tu PUD 1;,i1st nut hdv~ c1 signi1kant negative lmpacl on 1hose prupertie), ~urruunding lh~ rezoned area
•
and that the gener al public health , safety and welfare of the co mm, n1ty .ire p,otected. Staff lrns reviewed the
PUU requ es t and found the following:
• The PUD application is in coniom1an ce with the Compreh ensive ?Ian and the Unified Develop,,1 0111
Cot!<?.
• Th~ application is consistent with adopted .nd generally accepted standard s of development In the City.
• The tr~tfic !mi:-a ct study was re vi ewed by the Public Works Traffic D ivision and COOT, butl, con curred
wilh ii~ hl,d1 :1t;s,
• Th e rezo ned p ro perty will nol have a significant negative impact on those p roper11es surroundi,,R th e
re zoned 11reJ an d the general publi c health. safety and welforf of the community are p ro10c tcd.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Th e proposed ,'-IJ vajo Apartments PUD will gc11erat e ., o ne-time b 11ildh1g use tJ x ni .1 bou1 $2 60,000 ba sl:l d 0 11 a
cnnstruclin 11 co~t o f ;ipproxim,1 tely S 15 million . If Council rnnc:ur'i w ilh 1h P previn1 1dy flCfnpled park dcdici:111on
fe e, the project would also yen erate a one-tirrre park dedication foe i n-li eu of approxim atel y S 511 ,000 b,,sed on
1 41 fL'")h..lL'nlidl unit s.
The City of Englewood's portion oi property tax revenues are estir~1a1ed al S4 .000 J.)01' year . 'Tho 11 mo u11t of
annual sa les :ax rc \1en11e 10 th e City thal could l>e gener,,ted b y new resident s living In the City 1s d1 ffic 11II In
project given the nearby pres ence of 1he Riverpolnt shoppin~ ccn1er There ,lH! ab u cusb ,l:,)uli,llud with
providing services ~uc h as police and fire ; th o ut;h ii is d ifficult 10 esti m,1te wh411 th ese p roj e<.te d r-o )f5 ,,·111 h e .
UST OF ATTACHMENTS
Plannlns Commission St aff Report including Ex hibits A -I (May 14 . 20 13)
t>l a11ning Commission Min utes (May 14, 20 1 ])
Pl anning Commission r"indings of F,,ct
Pr o posed Bill for Ordinance •
•
•
•
~t
C T y 0 F ENGLEWOOD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO: Pbnnins and Zo11ing Commission
THRU:
FROM:
Alan While, Corn:m111ity Development Di,ector
Drook Bell , Pla11111er II ✓
DATE: M a y 14, 2013
SUllJECT: Case LUN20'l 3-001 • Public H ear ing
Navajo Apart:nents Planned Unit Developme,·t
APPLICANT:
Elsey Partners, .LC
I~) 2 Co:lege Ave11ue F 19
Manhattan, Kansas 6650 2
PROPERTY OWNER :
Bruce F.lsey & 4201 Soctl~ Navajo LI.C
3998 South Broadway
F.nglewood, Colorado 801 13
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
4201 So uth Nava jo Str ee t
PIN#'s: 2877-04-4-11-0 26 anti 2 0i 7-04·"·00-069
REQUEST:
The applicant ha s submitted an applicat,o, to rexone the fJdlcd s ,11,uve from 1-1 Li gh t
Industrial District to 11c N ;.vajo Ap.irtments l'lanned Unit D evelopment (P UD). Th e
proposed PUD would all cw a 111ax irn1.1rn o f 146 res ,d en tiJ I apar tm ent units on th e pro pe,ty.
RECOMMENDATION:
lase ZON2013·001 : Th e De:)artment of Comml111ity D ev elopmrnt r?.ro rnmends I1at :he
Pl a nning and Zoning C ommissi".'n review the Navajo Apartments PUD request and forw,,rcl
a favorable recommendat,011 lo, rl ilproval to City Cou11c ·I with the following conclit1011 :
• That the final Navajo streetscap2 section ma\' v~t\' from the curb alignment, sidewalk
w 'clth and location, and associated lan cscape zone shown 011 the PULJ ; and that 1he
final streetscape section lor the N ,wajo Apartments PUD will be approved by the City
Manager c>r clesienee in conju nction with the building permit.
IU OO tnglewood Parkwa1• En8lewood , Co lor,1do 80110 !'HONE 303 -762 -2 342 FAX 303 -761-6895
www.enak!woodRO\'.orK
LEGAL DESCRlPTlONS:
PIN#: ?077-04 -4-1 '1-026 f'lols l & 1 Except Koad Goormans lncust:ial Subdiv :sion.
PIN#: 1077-04 -~ 00 069 That part of the sol1tnea;t 1/4 of seclion 4-5-68 described as
beginning 5 ft. west of northeast corner of Lot 1 Gcorrna11 's lndust-ial Su bdivis ion, thence
west 347.25 ft . lo a pain: on easterly 1ight -of•w<1y line of !lie Atch;son Topeka a11d Sant.i Fe
Railroad then ce 11orth ea st 33.41 ft., thence east 340.63 it., then ce south 32.i S ft. to !h e
beginning sectio 11 4-5.£18
HIS UNG ZONE DISTRICT:
1-1 Ligr.t Industrial D islrict.
PROPERTY I.OCATION AND SUllROUNDING I.AND US~:
The sub1ect pro perty of this PUD is loca,ed mid-block on tne 4200 block of South Navajo
St reet b etween Oxfo ru Ave11ue tc, the north a1d Quincy Avenue to the sou th . The propert y
is approximately 800 feet south of RTD 's Ox ford Light R,1il St ;;t on . I ~nd to t1P so11 rh anil
CilSt of the subje ,:: proper ty is rnnP.rl 1-1 I igh 1 Industrial Distru:t and conta,ns indus t ria' uses .
1,md to the nor11 of the property was recently rezoned to the Oxfo rd Stat ion Trans t
UrientP.d Developme11t PUD th ~! will incl ud e 2.52 r esiden tial apart111 en : units w ith an
oplion for mixed ~ommerc1 al use s. Land d:rectly to the west of th e subject property
contain:. the BNSF r<1ilroacl tr acks and RTD Light Rail trar.~s and is not within the City o f
Englewood limits .
PUD PROCEDURE:
ReLu11i11g to a PUO requir e, th e applic,nt to have" p re -a pplication mee ting with staff, and
a neighborhood me eth 1g with ownPrs ~nrl ten~nt s loca ted within 1,000 fee t of th e
proposed P,~u. After the nei ghborhood 1'1eeting a forma l ap 1:lication is rn ade 10 the Cit\'
and review ed by City departments and o ther affecled o ut side agencie s. A public hearing is
held before t:-i e Planning and Zoni ng Comm;ss1on and City Council. If the PUO is
approved ther e is a 30 cla y referendum time pe ri od beiore becoming effective .
BACKGROUND:
The P.,nned Unit Oevelopmc11t is ,, rezoning process th at es tabli she s specifi c w nin,1 ,rnd
si l e planning cri teria l o meet the ne ed s of a specific c!eve lop111 e11t prupusd l 1h"1111dy 11 0 1 l,e
ao:on1111od i\tet.l witl 1ir, e,.is1 i11 g 1.0111111,1 de1•elopment regulation s. A PUD rezo ning :)rovicles
the oppo rtu :1ity for uni fi; ,1 rl Pve lnpmP ,-1I con trol for multiple proper ties or multipl,;, use s.
I he su!J1ect p·opert\' ;s owned by the developer 's f~ther Bruc e Ebe y. The site was the
former location of hi~ ca t litter manufacturing comp<1ny !hat has since relocated to a larger
facility in northwes t Englewood. Carrently, a manufacturer of outdoor b leach ers is leasing
th e existing warehouse build in g and remainder of the p1operty . The developer (Els ey
Partners ) believes 1h,1t the site's proximity lu th e Oxford Light Rail Station makes th e
property an excellenl candid ate for a residential apartment rnmplP x The developPr
torPSf>P_s young pr: iessionals working downtown ard students atte11d111g Arapahoe
Co mmunity College or the Au ra ria campus as poten tia l ten:mts .
2
•
•
•
•
•
In the fall of 201 2, the El sey PMtncr s can·e forward with" pro;:,osal lo construct I), .~n
1 30 and 180 apartme nt units on the 2.09 acre prope rty. Multi-unit dwellings are not
permitted in the 1-1 Li ght Industrial Zone District; th er efore, th e developer began the
proce ss of req cies ting a rezo,,ing to a PUD to ac:om modate the re,ide nti;,I use .
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARY :
PLirsuant to the l'UD procedure, the appl 'cant cond ucted a n eighbo rhood mee tin g 011
November 15, 201 2, prior 10 submitting th e applica ti o n for a PUO rezon i11g on Febru ary
19. 2013. Notice of the pre -a pplic ation mee ting was mailed 10 rrnpe I1y owners anrl
occupan ts of p roperty within I 000 fee t of the si te. Neigh borhood meeting notes are
attached to this Ieport (See Exhibit B).
CITY DEPARTMENT AND DIVISION REVIEW:
The Navaj o Apanme :ns PUD and su bsequ eni re visions were review ed by the Crty's
Development Review Team (DRT) on March :i'", 1\pril 9", and April 25 '" of 20 13 . ldP.ntifiP rl
iS5 .1 es we·e addressed by the app licant ,111d the final Na vajo 1\partments PUD wus
,ulJ111itt ed 0 11 Apr il 29, 20 13 .
OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS:
Pr cli 111i11 ,11 y µlan s o f th e propose d NJvajo A partments PUD were refereed to Tri -County
Health, RTD, the Colorado Depar t me nt oi Transportation (COOT), the Cit y oi Sheri dan ,
Xce l En erg\', Centur\' Link, an d Comcast. Each agen cy ex cep t for Co rnea ~! provided w rillcn
com ments Ilic1 1 dre altdlhed as F.x hib it s C -t-1 . Ther e we re nc obj ec tions in the coni:n en ts
re ce ived provid<?ci that the ap pl icant co ntinu es working w ith tlie ag encies' indivi clu,011
pr oce sse s. If any othe r fo rm al com ments are rece ived befor e t:"lc publ ic hear in g, Staff wi ll
pre se;it Il1 e111 during the hearin g.
Pt JI) OVERVIEW :
The pr oposed Nav ajo 1\oa rl rn cnts PUD wu uld alluw a rnaximwn of 146 resi de ntia l
;i partnce nt unili on the prope r!\', although th e current buildin g pl an ;hows 14 1 units . Tlie
major ity o f th e p,.rkin 8 would be on the surfa ce with a portio n o f th P. parking being tuc ked
unde rnea th ;h e seco nd story u( the bui lcJ ii:g (JJOdium style). The bui ldi ng is set close 10
Sou th Nav ajo Street sc th at mo st of th e parki11 g is on th e s,d es an d r•~ar of the property . The
Si te Pl an i11 clucl cs two interior courtyard s. p erimeter la,·,ds ta pin g, and irteri o r park ins lo !
l,1nd scaping . All 11ew ,111cl ex isti ng ut1liIi e; w ith in th e pr oper ty and abutting rig hI -of-w.1y
w ould be pl, :eel unde rgr ound
Ardtitcclural Character: The propo se d l'U IJ contains arcl'.itectu ra l charac ter stan dards
t1 aI require buil di ng plane ch anges P.very 50 fe et. a mix of p a llern ;i nd co lo r changes, .1
minimum 30 perce nt mas onry requir c men :, und a requirement !hilt buil din g enlrie s be
d ed rl y defined with architectural elemen ts. II should be noted that th e co nce ptu al b uil din g
footprin t shown on th e Site Plan and the 111nrir,sP rl huilrlin g Plevation s are ~11hj<!C I 10
change ; howev er, a,,y change~ would have to·meel th e Design St andards and Guidelines of
th e PUD
Permitted u~es: Th e sub ject properly lies within the 1-1 Ligh t In dustrial Zone District. Th e
exbliug 1-1 Zone District allows various l11rhi,1r la l anrl r.ommerrlal ri-Ps; howPver, most
residential uses are not permilted. The proposed PUD District Plan includes a table of
allowed use; that li st5 the p ermitted residential, commercial, and industrial uses. Some of
th e les s cle ;iraole us es in the commercial and inclus1,ial categories s,rch as adult lries and
duto urien1erl uses have been omitted from the table of allowed uses in th ,-PUD . Some of
the m o re 111lensIve industria l uses have also been ornilled fr om l he table. It should be noted
tha : all pcrmilted ind ustrial uses must cease once a Certificate of Occupancy for any
residential or co1rn11~1cial use is isslreu fur auy portion of the r.,rop~rty,
Dimensional Standards: Th e followins table provides a com pMison between tnc
property's existing 1-1 20ne dass ificat,on and the proposed PUD .
IC OMl'ARISON OF Dl~tJ:;NSIONAL 1u;QUtllf.MENTS FO ii t'JIINCll',\L STlltJC: rtJIIE~1
l\·lh1 M:1 .1.: Loi Min M.1~ Mi11imu111 Sc 1lmd\S (fl )
Lno i\'l ax F.\H Clw cr:1e1~ l.ol 11 ,i~hl -::-r~:ff.,-Al'l!ll Width Enth
(><111 ) (%) (rt) (fl) Shh: ll\:ur
1-1 (l~~iSlill~ 1Al11111g}
Wh.:rc a bll!hli11l abuls
upon. Arljo111s , or is
adjac:nt 10 a rcside:11i:,,I
All A ll owed .:011~ dismc1, mi ninum1
l;~c:i; None 2:1 None None None ~c1bncks or I O fi ~n all
~irte~ :ue ni,\ld,ed, u cr.111
as rcquirct1I11 SccIio11 16 ·
6-7 .K, "Scrcenins
Rcm1irenIe11I~ ...
Na,·:iio Anar1111 e11n 1111 0 fN"w i'.nni111H
Rcsidcmia l \Jses !,23 ~ f 1 per un 11 nr i\on e 15 None ·i, " 70 units pe r acre
Mn.(or 1-
rut:lic!I 11s1 ituti(HI.J I None '.\'one None No:1c: 100 010 5 Uses feel
MnJCo f
Cum111crcial Uses No11c '.'JOIIC' No ne Nont ,uu U 10) u
feel ----,---Whe ;c" bt:ildi11 g i\b.ns
np il n, mljoi1 1~. Of is
lndu s1nal IJ sc\ (Use-. 11clj ai.:<-1 11 10 11 ,esit1 en1i:1 I
H IIISt:I i r any Ill!\\' lOCt di slrict. m inill\lllll
n:s idcnlia/ or None 1.1 No ne No.1r 100 scfoacks or l O ft on o,11
com mere in I sid~s :m: required, exc ept
developme ·11 occur!..) ns ,ec111irrtl in Sl"r.lio n 16-
----J_ ----·--
6· 7.K. "Scr::emng
----~quircmcna .·:__~.-
Residenlial Density: The proposed Na va jo Ap artm ents PUD would perrn ,t a maximum o f
•
146 uni 1s on the 2.09 ac re property; this represents a density of 70 .0 dwelling units per •
acre. The PUD only ca lls for 141 unils at this tim e. For comparison purposes, the re :ently
•
••
•
rezoned Oxfo rd Station Transit Oriented Developm P-nl Pl.JD directly north of thi; site will
Include 252 residential apartment unil s on th e 3.50 acre property; this represents a densil y
of 71 .9 dwelli11~ u11its per acre .
Setbacks : A setbac~ is the minimum distance a structure mu;t be located from a property
line . The proposed PUD 's s~tb,1cks for residential uses are as follows :
front• 5 feet
Side -25 feet
Rear -25 feet
Public/Institutional Use s and Co mmercial Uses will follow the setb,1cks outlined for the MU •
B-1 Zone District. lndustri~l l./sPs wi :I follow th e setbacks outlined for the f. f Zone LJ';t rict.
Building Height: Tile maximum building heig l'.ts in th e PUD are based on th e ave rage
elevation of th e iinished grade at the co•ners of thP h11ilding, to thP h,eh es t po int of 1h e
building ur structure . The ma sirnurn Jllo ',!d building heigh t for res identia l uses is iS fee t,
although the PU D urd wi ngs la bel the buildin g '1eight as o eing +/• 60 feet . The m;ix,mum
allo wed building height within the PU D for Pu blic/lnstitution;i l Uses. Co mmercial U se s. and
lnri11 strial U ses is 100 fee t. It sho ul d be ,10Ied that The Unified De ve lopme nt Code (UDC)
has no maxi mum heigh1 lirn,t 111 the standard 1· 1 Zon e Distr icl.
Bulk Plane : The bulk p lane thal reg11IMP,s hnild in g mass is a function of req ui red s<?tbac ks
an d max 'rnurn building height for each typ~ of us e. Sheet A200 oi the PUD drawing;
illu strat e proje cted st-adows ior :lie proposed ap artmenls during the wI11 Ier and summer
so lsIice a; we ll as the fall eq uinox.
PMkin g: The UDC require s 1.5 parking spa ces for ea ch unit wi th less than 3 b edroom s,
plus 1 guest space for eve ry 5 units The proposed Navajo Apartments PUD requi re s
parki ng spac e for eac h u 11it, plus 1 guest spa ce for ev ery t O u nits. The ap p lica:i t believ e,
tha t th e Oxiord Light Rail Station (a pproxima tely 800 fed n ur th ) w,11 be utiliL ed b y tenants
of the ap anment complex res 1ilttng in lewer personal vehicl es . Thr. appli c ant also stat es
th ey hav e conduc ted parking sI11 rlies nn simi lar pro perties w ith simi lar parking rati ::,s and
n()le that th e lots arc only 60% full. r-or co mpa rison p urposes th e Oxford Station T,ansit
Orie nted Deve lopmen t PUD directly north of th e sit e also requires I parking sp ace fo r
each un it, but has gu est spa ce rati o of I sp ace for P.vny ~ uni ls
The UDC require s bi cycl e parking at a rate of 1 b icycle space for ev ery 2 urn :s. The
proposed Navajo Apa rtment s PUD req uires 1 b icycle spa ce for eve ry 5 unil s l o hP
acco mm oda ted with oi ke rack s. The app licant states that m any te,wnts wi ll prefe r to store
th eir bi cy.:le ins ,de their apa1111I te nt or i11 the 24 stora ge units tha '. will be avai lab le to them .
Traffic: A traffi c irrpact st udv wa s perform ed for th e propos ed Nava jo Apartmer,t s PLO.
Th e study area en compasse d the O xfor u Avtemrt! dllU Navajo Street intersection as well as
the Oxiord Avenue and Santa fe Drive inter section . The tr affic impact study ta kes into
acco unt the rP.,Pll l approval of O,ford St ation Tran sit Oriented Development PUD directly
nor:h of th e subject pro;ierty . The traffi c impac t study also takes into accu unt tlr~ µru1Juscd
cl evelopm ent 's cl ose prox ,rnity to th e Ox ford Lig ht Rail Station and ap pli es a 20 µe rcent
reduction in trip generation for the Navajo Apartments p ,oject. This reduction is 1a,e1
because of the likelihood of lra11si1 use from a transit o nen ted development; 1:1e 20 perce rt
is considPred a conservative reductio11.
The traffic impact study indicates that ,he o~rord Avem,e dllU Sa11ta Fe Drive i11terse c1ion
currently has an overall peak hour IP.vPI ni service (LOS) of n . The Oxford Avenue and
Navajo Street intersec ti on currently I .,is an overall peak hour level of serv 'cc i LOS) of B.
After the approvec: Oxford S1a1io11 aud the proposed N.wajo Apartments run r rojen; are
conmuc1erf ('.?O 15), the traffic study shows a,1 ;n crease ,n overall 1raif1c vcl11me from t1e
two projects; however, analysis of future traffic conditions shows that the additio·1al traffic
vobmc is not expected to create a discernible impact to traffic operations in t:i e
sur "ouncling rn,,dwar systern. For 2015 , th e trnfii c study indicates 1ha1 Ill? Oxior rl A•1Pn11e
;ind S;inta Fe Dnve intersection and the Oxford Avenue and Navajo Street intersection will
continue 10 have overall peak hour levels of servic e of (LOS) of D and B respectively.
The slutly area roadways are curre11tl1• r.onsrruc1ed To 1h eir ultim~Te cross-section and t:ie
traffic sludy does not recornrr.end any modilications at lhi s lime. The e.xi sting inten::.e cti on ~
are pro ;ec l c d to opcr.itc al iuture levels of service com pa,able to ex isting conditions durhg
peak traffic ho urs. The traffic impact stucy was 1evi ewe d by 11,e Public Works T affit.
Divisior: a11d COOT, and both review,m rnnnrrrP.rl wi1h irs fi nd in gs
Signage: The proposed PUD will follow th e sig11age regulation s for the ,vtU-B-1 Zo·1e
Dislric, outlined in 16-C,,: 3 o f the IJDC as amended, except Lhat the PUD would pen nit 1:1e
111axirnurn height 2 projecting sign to be 55 feet h·gh ra:her tnan the L DC's maximum
height limit of 15 feet.
Landscaping: The UDC 11,quire s that a 111i11irr1u1n of 8%-10% of a property be landscaped
,n the '• I Zone Dimk:I . Further, the UDC requires that a minimum of 20% of the property
be landscaped :or mult,-unit dwellings in the MU-B-1 zone district. The Na vajo Apartment~
PUD proposes a minimum of 15% of the property be landscaped. The U DC also requires
1ha1 a m1nimun1 of 70% of th e requ irec lands cape be "living" lands cape . The Navajo
Apartm ents PU \I sit e pl an proposes that 73% of :he required I S% mirnmum landscape be
·'living". !"he non.living a1eas include., s,-nlhetic ll:rf dog run and the interior courtyard with
a p ool. The l'U D requirements exceed the regulat ions of the UDC for rnulti -unil dwellings
i11 tli~ MU-8-1 Zo11e District in terms of rree and shrub q11an1it ies .
Screening and Fencing: The PUD proposes IC scre en the perimeter pa:king lols with a 5 10
6 foor wide buffer of shlllb pl,::itings and de ci duous tree s. On the north µroµcrty li11e. the
Oxford Station PUD will he constmr.ting a 6 fool high privacy fence between their project
and the proposed Navajo Apartments PUD . The property lo the south of th e Na v;:,j o
Apartments PUD nas an existing warehouse building constructed ri~hl on the shared
prope1 ly line such 1i1dt fencing is 1101 necessary.
Drainagt!: The proposed Drainage Plan and Preli,ninary Drair,age Report wcrt reviewed
and approved by the City's Public Works Department.
6
.-
•
•
Park Dedication: The subdivisio11 regulations of the UD C require the dedication of par k
land or payment of a fee in lieu of ded ication for all ,·esidential developments. The UDC
provides a method for clet,:,nnining t'ie amount ai land ta be dedicated based an the
number of u11 ils and the number of new residents that will be generated . Based 011 the
proposed 141 multi-unit dwellings, the pro;:ioscd Navajo Apartments PUO would require a
park dedication of 2.72 acre; of land o· payment of a fee in lieu of land dedi cat ion.
On September 4, 2012 City Council aclopteo a fee to be paid in lie u of dedic~tion amrnml
of S20,000 per required acre . Cr edi : towards the dedication requirements for recreational
amenities provided on-site by the developer and waivt;>rs uf all or a por tion of the rem aining
fee-in-lieu may be requested . Requests are co11s 1dered on a case -by-case basis at the
discretion of Council. Council w ill be cons ,dering the final fF'F'-in-lie11 of dedication amo ,mt
concurrently or shortl)' after approval of the PUD .
PUD SUMMARY,
The proposed Navajo Apartments PUD has been revi ewe d by thf' City', Development
Review Team (ORT) and th e app ropriate outside age nci es. Is sue s ide ntified by the L)IU
were addressed by the applicant an d !here were nu objections fro ~, the outside agencies
provided that the applicant con tmues working wi th the a~encies' individual processes. The
PUD documents are complete and only one u!rlirional cond ition of app rova l is
recomrnenrled al this tim e. Therefore, rhe Community Development D epartment
recommends thaI the Plan11i11g a11u Zo ning Commiss.on rev iew th e Navajo i\partments
P:.J D re que st and iorward a la vo rable recommendation for ap::,roval 10 City Co uncil.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS:
The Planning and Zu11i11g Commission is 10 review Navajo Apart ments PUD recpest, and
following the publrc hearin g, ma y recommend th at the Council a,prove, den y, ::i r approve
the rezo11 11Ig with conrliriors . In irs re v;ew of the app:-Cation, th e Cornmission ';
recornn,endations should include findi,:gi on each of th e following points :
I. I he applica uon is or is not in conforman ce with the Co mprehensive Plan and this Fir.le
(UDC).
The 'Javajo Apartments PUD co nforn s to the Comprehensive Plan st rateg y of
redevelopment . The Co n;prehe ·1s,ve Plan states, "Englewoo :I residents will benefit
from th e new opportunit ies ior housin g, shopping, and entert~imnent these new
developments will bring to the City" Th: p,01,usecl PUD Sllppurl, !li e fo llowing
Comprehensive Plan Housing Goal /11 : "Promote a balance mix of housing
opportunities servi ng the ne ecs of all c:urrP.nt ;rnrl f11Iure Fnglewood citi zens"
Addi tionall y th e PUD docwnenls state: ··This c!P ·•e lopment fits w ith the goals of
Transit Oriented Development in that it creates multi-family development near
transportation hubs . Th e development will co mplement the Oxford Stat ion proiect
that w~s ~I ,ea dy app,oved and encourage more develo~ment of resi dential unit,
replad11g industrial warehouses ." A 4,,ll00 square foot manufactunng/warehouse
building currently occupies th is site. The projec t addresses the City's 3-p art strategy
outlined in th e 2003 Englewood Comprehensive l'ian for Growth and D ev elopment
in the City; Revitalization, Redeveloprne11t dlld Reinvention.
The project w ill brin3 new life mto the area and provide a uniqu e housins option for
residents near an e,istins l'sht ,~ii st ation. The pro ject takes advanrage cf existing
infrastructure and transportation options w hile re uwesting in an exis ting industria l
and established 1eside 11ti al 11ei gl 1:.iurlruu r.J . Tire additional residents will take
adv.rn tage of the ex i;ting arnenilies in th e neighborhood and generat1e ta, reve nue
rh at will h enPfit programs and ser vices provided by rbp City of Fn glPwnnrl. ThP
increased tax revenu e will also be1 1e fit other ta xing entities, rno st notaoly the Schoel
Di~trict.
2. Th e application is o r is not consis te nt witli adopted ,1nd gene,a//y accepted standards of
develoµ111e r11 in tile Cit y.
Th P r-.a vajn Apartm Pn t< Pl.In is cnnsis lP.n t with ,1dopterl anrl gP~Pralll' ,1,,PplPrl
dev elopmen t standards es tabli shed by th e City of b1gle wood . I he applicat,0 ·1 was
rev i ewed b y the City's D ev elopm ent Rev ,cw Tea m (:)RT) and the appropriate
outside ?.g encies . /\II commenls w ere i dt,,essed b1• the applicant.
3. Th e ap p /ica 1io n is 0 1 i 1101 >1i'Js1~1111a /ly con;istent >Viti, the goals, ob i ectiv es. design
r,t 1icle lin e~, policies ancl .~ny other ordinance, law, or re~u iremcm o f t he City.
l he Navajo Apartments l'UD is substantially consisten t wi th the goals, objectives,
design gu idelines, policies, and otl-i er ordinanc es, li ws and 1equi rernent s of the City .
The U D C r equires that the re,iew or decis io n r..aking body shall only approve a propo sed
PUD if ,t finds th at the proposed development complies wit h all app li cable use.
d eve lo pment, and desi1:n standards se: fo rth in th e U OC Ina! are not o t herwi se morliflerl o r
waived ac c ordi ng to the re zo nin g approval; a.,d tire proposed rezon 111g meet, o ne oi th e
follow,n g c, iteria :
Tk ,t the µrop osed devel oprnenr wii/ exc eed th e developmen t quality st,inda rc!s, !?.-e ls o f
pub!ii: amenicie s, or levels oi J es ign innov ati on oth erwise dpp iiGtb fe und~r this Title, ,1 nc/
W<.Jlllti Hut I.J c, pos,i/Jle ur prac:tica/J le under a S(an c.ldrd zone c.Jisuic:t wit/J 1.1.1n<.IW01Jal tr>t'S
o r with a rea sonable number of Zoning Variances or A<Jminisrrarive Acljustmems; or
Th e proposed PUD will exceed the de velopment quality ;ta ncla rds req<.•irec by th e UDC
fo r inclu slrial devc:o pmcnl ~s follows :
• The Pxi5ri11g 1-1 7.one Di51rirr allows more i 111 ensiv ? lanrl uses than 1he propo sed
NavaJo Apartments l'UIJ. The exrst,ng 1-1 Zone Dis trict has less res 1rict ive
setbacks, '-ie,g ht limitations, and landsca p ing requ iremen ts th an the proposed
PUD. •
•
•
• Th e l Jf)( ha s no requir~ments for buildings in an ex isting 1-1 Zone District as far
as: building articulation, variety of materials, building transparency, or
architectural character. The PUD proposes a greater level of building articulatio n
incl'lding: a 3 foot minimum building pl an e c ha,~gc-every 50 feet a mix of
pattern and color changes, a mii,imum 30 percent masonry requ irement, and
cle arly defined building entrie s
b. Thai the p roperty cannot be developed, or that no reasonable economic use of th e
property ca n be achieved, un der th e ex,strrrg zoning, eve,, t/11 o ugh (/r e u~e of c ond itional
uses or a reaso nab!e number o f Zoning Varian ces or 11 dministrative Adiusunents.
111 addition to th e tw o P!a nncd Unit D eve lopmen t considerat io ns above , th e UDC requ ires
11,at a pr uperty rez o ned to PUD mu st 11 0 1 have a signifi can t ne gati ve rmpact o n th ose
propel'li es surrounding the rezo ned area and that the general public health, safety ~ml
we lfare o f th e cornr1uni1 y are protected . S:aff has reviewed the PU ) req ue~t a nd fo un d the
fo llow i11g :
• Th e Pl.ID ap plicatio n is in co nfo rman ce wi th th e Comprehensive Pl an and the:
U nified D ev ele:pmenl Cod e.
The appli ca tion is cons'sten t with adopted and gen erall y ac ce pted standards of
deve loprn ~n t in lhP City.
• The traffic 'mpac t study was rev iew ed uy the Puulic Works Tr affi c Division an d
COOT; both conc urred wi th il s findin gs .
• The re;,0 11 ed pro ;x•rt y will not hav e a sig ni fica nt n ~ga 1ive in,?:t CI on tho se pro penies
~urrounding th e rezone d areJ and th e gene ral public hea l th, sa fe ty and welfare o f
tir e cornrnrrnity are pr otec ted .
ATTACHMEN .IS :
Exhibit A: Navajo Apar1111 ,1 nts PUD
F.xhibi1 B: Neigh bo rhood M ee1i11 g Su ·nm ary -N ove mb er 15, 20 11
Ex hibit C: Tri -C o unty I lealth De pa rtment -Lelre, dated M arch 11 , 20 13
Exhibit D : RTD -Leiter ela te d M arc h 4, 20 13
t xh1b i1 E: CDOT Regi o11 b -Leit er dat ed 'ebru ary 28, 20 ·13
Exhib it F: Ci ty of Sl·er idarr -Leit er dated March 8, 20 13
Exhibi t G: Xcel En e·gv • Leiter dated March 11, 2013
Ex hibit H : Cenru ry Li nk -Letter dat ed April 10, 201 1
E,hibi: I: t\cl dendum to Traifi c Im pac t StLrd y • Dar ed Aprrl 2, 201 3
b:hrb n J: rraffic :mpact Study and App endix A
9
•
•
Navajo Apartments PUD
Neighborhood Meeting
4201 South Navajo Street
November16 ,2D12
Attendees : Approximately 13 (see attached sign-in sheets)
e,oplicant Presentation
EXHIBIT 8
1. Bryan Elsey of Elsey Partner:,, LLC, stated that he grew up in Denver, and then went
to Kansas State University with his brother Chris Elsey where they both studied
landscape architecture. After graduating, he and his brother started three
companies; Prime Design, Prime Built, and Prime Place. The companies design,
build, and manage apartment buildings with a focus on student housing . To date
they have constructed 450 apartment units in Manhattan, Kansas and 164 units in
Stlllwater, Oklahoma. Bryan Elsey then introduced his father B.ruce Elsey who owns
the subject property at 4201 S. Navajo St. and ran a cat litter manufacturing
company named Precious Cat there prior to moving his operations to a larger facility
in northwest Englewood.
2. Bryan Elsey described the proposed development which includes:
• 186 market rate one and lwo bedroom apartment units .
• A plan of 4 stories on top of a podium style parking design, resulting in 5 stories.
• The 4th slory includes some units with a loft that would add another story.
• The plan includes two interior courtyards, one with a pool.
• There are 209 parking stalls shown on the plan for the 186 apartment units.
• The developer is still working through some storm water issues .
3 . Public Comment
The attendees asked questions and provided comments as follows . The applicant
responderl to the questions and provided the following answers (in italics):
Who did your market study? Have you looked at the Alexan project in Littleton or
the Riverton project? A formal study has not been conducted at this time;
however, it appears there have been several new multi-family projects
constructed along the light rail corridor line .
The property just south of 4201 S . Navajo St. manufactures paint booths.
What are the unit sizes and price per square foot? We anticipate 750 to BOO
square feet for a one bedroom. $900-$1000 monthly rent for a one bedroom,
$1 ,200-$1,300 fora two bedroom.
Is the entire building podium style parking? Yes, so the building would be 5 to 6
stories or about 68 feet at its maximum height.
Where will you do your storm water detention? We will use underground
detention?
Is there any landscaping around the outsiJe of the property? There will be a
perimeter landscape buffer and higher-quality landscaping along the street .
• There does not seem to be much landscaping, does it comply with City codes?
We a doing a PUD to create a mu/ti-unit residential development while providing
a landscape that works with the proposed development.
Has this project been through the City's Development Review Team? We hao/8
had a preliminary meeting with the City on our proposed concept .
, Which direction does the drainage go? Water runs west !o the railroad right of
way.
What are your parking ratios? In our project in Manhattan Kansas we had . 75
parking stalls per unit and the parking lot seems to be about 60% occupied at
any given time .
Will a parking rat io that low push parking onto the streets?
What is your liming for construction? We're not sure yet, we are interested in
seeing how the Oxford Sia/ion PUD project to the north of 'JS does.
Who is doing your civil engineering? Roth Engineering
4. City staff outlined the PUD process and next steps . The PUD frequently asked
questi ons were prov ided .
5. Bryan Elsey of Elsey Partners , LLC made some dosing remarks and the meeting
was adjourned.
2
Plea. Sign In
Site: 4201 hlavajo Street
Pl ease Print
[ Name
./::>rttx>Leef{
. ' • ',a,..:77,1 -·..,. i {.,-' :,~, I'-' c/<-'
Planned Unit Development
Pre-Application Neighborhood Meeting
November 15, 2012
Address City I Zip
Code
: /0CO ':'/~ Par):u.xy j §/CUJord/cLJ ~ I
ftk•I !J/ 5/i;H!ildP ,f ,l"c --------1----------'---
~~J \pM?Jf=· :':-)'//1 .:>c:!. f':.l~ j.L.L__i~~ ;':9-----,
I ....:-:\U,--lf-tb"" C ~,2.,.)<,1 l 5 jL./3'1'0 ~. ~--lr .. t .. t>o:..m&,u-~ ,,..,ac;. 0_,(,0 fo/ JD
...:Jal'\'" r;",/.-, .. 1~ I\ bb_J'\/ _fr;r,c,A1111 Pl fn1 le.wa,,J g'clf/()
I<..
1, II
•
•
March 11 , 2013
Brook Bell
'VTri-County r Health Department
City of Englewood
Community Development Departmenl
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, Colorado 80110
RE : Navajo Apartments PUD
TCHD Case No. 2856
Dear Mr . Bell:
EXHIBIT C
Thank you for the opportunity lo review and comment on the proposed Planned Unit
Development (PUD) application for the site located a, 4201 South Navajo Street to allow
for 141 residential apartments close to the Oxford Station. Tri-Co~nty Health
Department (TCHD) staff has reviewed the application for compliance with applicable
environmental health regulations and potential recommendations for site improvements
to encourage opportunities for healthy community design .
Healthy Community Design and Connectivity
Because chronic diseases related to physical inactivity and obesity now rank among the
country's greatest public health risks , TCHD encourages community designs that make
ii easy fo r people to include regular physical activity , such as walking and bicycling, in
their daily routines . At the project site level. TCHD encourages applicants to incorporate
a well-connected system of pathways for pedestrians and bicycl ists that support the use
of a broader pedestrian and bicycle network off of the site. The followiny comments
relate to the information contained in the PUD regu lations .
Land Uses
TCHD recognizes that the current propos>'II is for 141 res idential units. However, the
PUD does not appear to list any allowable land uses . TCHD encourages the applicant
to consider how the project might accommodate a future request for a small scale
neighborhood use like a community garden. Commur,ity garden s are an excellent way
In an urban environment to provide access for re sidents to heallny foods .
Setbacks and Building Orien tation
The design and orientation of build ings can increase residents ' use of sidewalks along
streets impruving the safety on the street by bringing more people to observe activitie~.
TCHD commends the applicant for the aliowance for a zero s.'!tback for a portion of the
building and the requirement th;,t 50% of the building be located at a 5 to 15 •foot
selbll<'.k . TCHD encourages the applicant to use design standards lo articulate ~ow the
building fac;ade along the street should incorporate pedestrian-scale design feat,.res .
Please se e more comments about design standards in the next section of this lettRr.
Serving Adams . Alapahco .-nu Oouylus Counties • Richard L. Vogt. MD, Executi·,o Direc'.or • www.lc hd .org
6162 S. WIiiow Dr , Suite 100 • Greenwood Village , CO 80111 • 303-220·9200
Navajo Apartments PUD
March 11, 2013
Page 2 of 3
Design Standards
The proposed language under "Design Standards and Guides" does not translate into
specific requirements that will be easily enforceable when a proposed site plan on this
site Is evaluated TCHD suggests adding more specific requirements to help articulate
the intent of this section.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation
TCHD encourages the applicant to include more specific requirements to ensure an on•
site system of good connoctivlty for the proposed and any future deve lopment The
proposed language under "Pedestrian and Bicycle Access and Connectivity" does not
translate into specific requirements that will be easily enforceable when a proposed slle
plan on this site Is evaluated. In order to ensure that requirements stated in the PUD
foster a walkable desi!ln that incorporates direct connections between on-site amenities
and the broader circulation network, TCHD recommends adding greater specificity ior
location, minimum width and design criteria of on-site sidewalks .
Parking Standards
TCHD commends the applicant for allowing for a 25% parking reduction if within¼ mile
from a transit station. This type of standard is becoming more common in TOD
standards In the Denver Metro region anJ helps support greater use of transit among
residents of the development.
•
Bicycle Amenities •
As mentioned earlier in this letter, TCHD supports community design that makes it easy
for res,dents lo walk or use their bicycles . TCHD commends the applicant for includin!I
bicycle parking standards in the PUD. The site plan does not seem to show bicycle
facilities on the exterior of the building . While bicycle storage for residents could be
accommodated internal to the building . it is important to include bicycle parking facililies
that are easily accessible to visitors.
Flammablo Gos
The subject property is located approximately 800 feet ~outheast of the former Arapco
Land!ill. Flammable gas from landfill may pose a health and safety hazard to the
development. Seci:r,n 1006-2 ur the City of Englewood Unified Development Code
requires flammable gc:s testing and approval for development located within one
thousand feet of a former landfill.
Based on that requirement, TCHD recommends that the 1pplicant work with a qualified
environmental consultant to prepare a flammable gas investigation plan for the site, to
be reviewed and approved by TCHD. Upon completion of tho in•iestigation , ".'':HD will
review the results and determine if it will be necessary to incorporate a flammable gas
control system(s) into the project. In addition . TCHD will determine whether construction
safety practices are necessary during construclion on the site .
Sun Safety for Outdoor Common and Gathering Areas •
Skin cancer is the most common cancer in the United States . Colorad1J has the s"'
highest death rate from melanoma , the most deadly form of skin cancer. A leading risk
factor for skin cancer is exµosure to ultraviolet rays (UV) from the sun . Seeking shade
•
•
Navajo Apartments PUD
March11 .?013
Page 3 of 3
when outside Is one of the best ways to prevent overexposure to UV rays. TCHD
recommends the use of shade In common areas like courtyards, patios and play areas
through the planting of trees or physical shade structures . it is important that shade
structures or appropriate landscaping is considered early in the des ign process so that it
Is incorporated well into the overall site plan and optimizes the oppor.unlty for residents
and visitors to shield themselveo from the sun end reduce the ir risk of skin cancer.
Please feel free to contact me al (720) 20u-1571 or slynch@tchd.org if you have any
questions on TCHD's comments.
S incerely ,
Sh1:1 ila Lynch
Land Use Prog ram Coord inator
Tri-County Health Oepar1men t
CC : Warren Brown , Hope Dalton, Vanessa Richardson, Laura DeGol ier , TCHD
•
•
•
March 4, 2012
Brook Bell, Planner II
City of Englawood
Community Dovolopment Department
10DD Englowood Parkway
Englewood, CO 80110
Re : C~se No .: ZON2013-001 , Navajo Apartmcnto
Deor M r . Bell
EXHIBIT D
fFClnD
Th ank you for providing RTD with the opportunity tn comment on the above referenced
r.n~P.. RTD strongly supports th is type of higher density development in the areas adjacern
to light ro il stetions . Our one su ggestion i• •• follows : it appears from the p lans that the
•idttw•lk along South Navajo Street is an attached sidewalk . So as to enhance tha
pedestrian environment along South Navajo to the Oxford Light Rail Station. RTD would
re c ommend requiring a detached sidewalk , if p ossible .
Thank you aga in for t ho opportun ity to commen t on this case. Should you need additional
information , I can be reached at 1303) 299-2439 .
Sincerely , r~
Chris Quinn
Projer.t Manager
c : Development Review File :Englewood .
1000 Blal.e SUN I, Oerwer, Col orad080202 • 303 .299 .6000 • f1d-dtnwr.eom Roglonel Tr,1n1pc1r1at1on Olstrlcl
EXHIBIT E
0
•
STATE OF COLORAD(e
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Reaion 6 T,.-fl!r
Acce1IIU1il hiei PermllS
Knad,ltt r Adwtthins
2000 Su u1h Holly SIJCel
n.tn"er. Cok,1ado 80222
J0l•512-427l FAX JQJ.J)'/.'JHb
f'ebruary 28, 2013
City of Enelcwood
Attn : Brook Hell
Community development dcpnrtmcnl
I 000 Englewood P•rkway
Englewood , Colorado 80110
Dear Mrs. llell :
-
RF.: ZON21113-DUI NAVAJO APARTMENTS 4201 SOUTII NAVAJO STREET ANO SH (85)
CIT\' OF ENGLEWOOD
Thank you for refening the proposal for our review . II dues not appear that any work is 10 be performed
in CDOT right of way. If the proposal should change to oht ab permission lo c,,nstruct utilities withi.
slate highway right-of-wu y, u Utility/Speciul Use Permit is required. Please visit our website ul
http://www.,dot .state co ys/UljJityPrc11rram/P~, or ohlain the application throui:h this office.
If you have any questions , please contact me at 303 -S12 -~27l.
Sincerely,
llradley T. Sheehon, l'.E.
Access Enginee r
cc l'6: Ref: 022613 .docx File {Sil 44)
Page I of I
•
•
•
CITY OF SHERIDAN
4101 S. Federal nt,d.
Sheridan, CO 80 t 10-1316
l03n62 -2200
303/438,3398 Fnx
EXHIBIT F
March 8, 2013
Brootc8ell
City of Englewood
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood. CO 80110
Ra : 4201 S. Navajo Street
Engl.wood, CO
Plannod Unit Development Amendment Referral
Dear Brook :
The City of Sheridan is in receipt of Iha Planned Unit Development Amendment Referral
for Iha Navajo Apar1ments project located al 4201 South Navajo Strool, caee number
ZON2013-001. We hava reviewed Iha proposal and have the followtng comments :
1. Is lh,s proposal modifying an ex isting PUD? The cover sheet referenced a PUO
amendment. If there is an existing PUO ll should be clearly referenced end ils
reception number referenced .
2. Sinr.e the survey ($101) shows this project on two lots, wll a subdivision action
be required lo eliminate the lot llne running through the middle of the project?
Also, is the sanitary ea&11menl owner ok wllh having trees l~cated In the parl<ing
lot islands wilhin close proximity lo lhe existing sanitary sewer line?
3. Sheet A 102
a. Shows two names for the project. Navajo Apartments on the top of lho
page , and ,201 S Navajo under the intent.
b . Under the inlenl statement ii indicates the PUD mostly compies with lhe
Comp Plan and Code. It would be nice to know how it doean\ comply as
part of lhis appllcalion .
c. The intent portion Identifies the "Oxford Transit Orienteel Development.'
Is that a plan, a study or part of the recent Light Rall Corridor Plan?
d. Under the 'Relationship to the Unified Code" portion of lhe page, the
applicants have expressed an Interest In not having the PUO ever lap&e.
Is lhis pe,mllled from a vested property rights standpo int?
e . The dlmenslonal requirements show a 10' setback to the south as the
r.,quirement, but lhe site plan shows parking lo within 4 .72' of the south
property line.
f . The siZea of the parl<ing spaces are shown at e•s·. The site plan
dimensions them al 8.5'. Should be cons istent. At any rale , a space less
than 9' Is too narrow . Suggest Increasing the parl<ing space sizes. This
will impact either lhe number of spaces or the size of the parking lot
Islands .
www .ci .i-heridan .co . us
Brook Bell
March 8, 2013
Page 2
g. We sugg•t mare bike racka be provided given the location and nature of
this development.
h. Under "Land&eaplng and Seteenlng" ratios of trees and shrubs are
provided per RLA. Please define what RLA Is.
The "Oeelgn Standard$ and Guides" only Slates they will have high quality
articulated designs . More detail Is needed to under&tand their design
Intent.
4. Consistent page numbering on the plans would be helpful.
5 . Sheet C101
A. Will tho exla Ung cha in i nk fence romaln on the nonh property li ne? Given
the outdoor R1onlge In that area , it makes sense for the epp i cants to
prov ide more of e vtsual screen . ·
b. Site triangles should be shown at the vehicular entrances to the site.
c. Ara the two small sldowa lks ehown sufficient to gel pedestrtans from th is
site to Navajo?
d . The "drinking straw" look ing element immediately west of lhe alto need&
to be lden tilled .
e. Legend should Include 'lumber of parking spaces .
6 . What is the 50' easement on the west port ion ol the site for?
7 . WIii one trash enclosure be sufflCl ent fo r the number of apar1ments at th is site?
Thank you fo r the opportun ity to rev iew this plan . Sho uld any questions arise . please
either call me Al 303-433 -~307 or via email at lhonninggr@cl .sherjdan .co.us .
Sincerely,
A
S a Consu t ng Pia ner
•
•
•
•
•
fl Xcel Energy·M
PU.HIC SEIIVICE COMPANY
March 11, 2013
City of Englewood Community Development
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, Colurado 80110
Attn: Brook Bell
Re : Navajo Apartments PUD, Case#ZON2013-D01
Right af Way & Permit•
1123 West 3"' Alienua
Denw,, ColoradO !0223
Tclophono : 303 .1171 ,3300
Facaimi!e: :103. 571.3524
OOmt.1.george@xceltnetV)'.com
Pubic Service Company of Colorado (PSCo ) has reviewed the plans for Navajo Apartments
PU0 . Please be aware PSCo owns and op1:11ates ex isting electric distribution facililies within lhe
proposed project area . Public Service Company nas no objection to this proposed rezone ,
contingent upon Public Service Company of Colorado's ability to maintain all existing rights and
this amendment should not hinder our ability for future expansion , including all present and any
future accommodations for natural gas and elec:ric transmission related facilities .
Please be aware thAt dRpending on how the transfo rmer csbinet will open the tand,;capiny plans
n;ay need to be adj~sted to accommodate clearance requirements .
The property owner/developer/contractor must contact the Builder's Call Line at 1-800-628-2121
and complete the application process for any new gas or electric service , or modification to existing
facilities Including relocation and/or removal and associated costs. ii is then the responsib ii'ty of
!he developer lo contact lhe Designer assigned to the projAct for ap;:,roval of design d11tails .
Additional easements will need to be acquired by separate document for new facilities.
As a safely precaution , PSCo would like to remind the developer to call the Utlllty Notification
Center at 1-800-922-1987 to have all utilities located prior lo any construction .
If you have a11y questions aboul this referral response, please contact me at (303) 571 -3306.
Sincerely,
Donna George
Contract Righi of Way Referral Processor
Public Service Company of Colorado
April 10, 20B
City ofF.nglewood
Community IJevelopment Department
Mr. Rrook Bell
1000 En{llewood Parkway
Englewood, CO 80110
KE : Case No .: ZON2013-00I
4201 S. Navojo St ., Englewood , Colorado
Navajo Apartments
IJear Mr. Bell,
EXHIBIT H
Qwest Corporation dlb/a CcnturyLink QC has reviews'<! the materi als pro,·i dcd by thi s proposal.
CenruryLink ha• no objection to the Case .
•
However, plc:ise no te that CenturyLink owns , operates w,d maintains telecommunication cables •
and tcm1inols ot the structure adllrcsse,l above . The costs of certain modificat ion to or relocat ion
of said facilit ies may be billable to the Requcstnr.
The Rcquestor should contact CcnruryLink Field Engineer Tim Styron at
tjm.styron@centurylinl,;.c om , tu IIIT8llge for the sate and proper removal of any existing
CenturyLink facilities aud to discuss planning for new facilities (including fiber ) 10 serve this
aparttnent devclopmc:11 .
Thank you for the oppo1tuni1y 10 review the referenced Case .
Sincerely,
/u./1,._
Charles Place
Right o f Way Mau ag<:r
Century Link
77S9 S. Wheel in!! Ct.
Englewood, CO 80112
720 .578 .S 132
charlcs.place@centuryl ink .com
•
•
•
EXHIBIT I
,,1(~ {~.·~:-::.~·.> SM ROCHA, LLC
... ~.-'-'' TRAFF'IC ANO TRANAPnitTA.Tl,ON CON S ULTANT ■
~I
April 2, 2013
Mr . Ladd Vostry
Traffic Engineer
City of Englewood
1000 Englewood Pkv.y
Englewood, CO 80110
RE : Traffic Impact Study-Compliance Letter
Navajo Apartments
Dear Mr . Vos1ry :
SM ROCHA , LLC prepared the February 2013 lralf,c impa:t study (TIS) :or Navajo Apartmen1s and
the March 20, 2013 supplemental traffic signal operations informa tio~ lor Oxford Avenue and
Nava jo Streel intersection . The basis for prepared information was Navajo Apartments proposing
lo cons'.rucl approximately 130 residenti al dwelling un its .
II is understood that lhe 101a1 number of dwemng units proposed for co nstruction has increased to
141 . Proposed site access to Navajo Street remains unc~anged from 1hal presented in 1he
February 2013 TIS .
Sim ila r to the February 2013 TIS , s1andard traffic generation characte ristics compil ed by the
lnsti1ute o: Transportation Engineers (ITE) in their report en1illed Tri~ Generation, 81h Ed ttlon , were
appli ed 1o the additional dwelling units in order to esti mate the Increase in averagij daily traffic
(ADT), .A.M Peak Hour, and PM Peak Hour vehic'ij tlips lo r site development . A vehicle 1rip 1s
defined a~ a one-way vehicle movemenl from a point of origin to a point of destination .
Trip gP.neration rates used for comparison ar e presen ted in Table 1.
-)~:~t~v£~A.i ·;i~itf)'ii1i:~tJfttf,~:/~+~s(:_, \-::-:.,,• ..
TRIP GENERATION RATE 0
ITE 2< I AM PEAK HOU~ I PM PEAK HOIIR
COO : LA"ll USE UNI T HOURI ENTER EXIT TOTAJ..I ENTER cxrr TOTAL
220 Apt1:lrnen11 DU 8.85 I 0.102 0.408 o.s, j 0.403 0 217 0.82
t<e,.: OU • Owtllflll Uib
I 2303 AIRPORT WAY, SUITC 200 GROCMF"IELO, COLORAOO 80021
0:(3031 327· 1 49 □ F":1 3031 32'1· I 499
WWW,9MAOCI-IA . COM
.\Ir. L•dd Vosuy April 2. 2013
!!!!:!!!~~men1s .-r,,rr,r; 1111µ111:1 SIIJ!IYComplfa_r.~_, __ ~--=~-==~~~=~•·;.~~ge=2
Table 2 illustrates projected average daily lrafflc (ADT), AM Peak Hour, and PM Peak Hour traffic
volumes likely generaled by the addilional eleven (11) dweling units .
ITE 24 . AA! P!W< HOUR . ' PM PEM HOUR
CODF. UNO USE SIZE 1 ~OUR EHT!.=I EXIT TOT l'L ENTER EXIT TOlAL
220 Apnrtments 1 , c·u n
TOD RedUCIIOOI :,20%) 15
To1a1: 5:l
Tab !e 2 summarizes thaI lt-e add :tional dwelling um,~ will genarale an lncreosc of approximately 59
da ily trips with 4 of U1ose occurring during lhe AM Peak Hour and 5 during tho PM Peak Hour.
Moreover, the diffi;rence between peak hour lrip generation of 130 and 141 dwelling un\ls results in
an increase in traffic generalion of ~pproximately eight percenl. This minor increase in s\le traffic
generation is not substanUal enough to create a regative im pact to traffic operations of the exisliig
surrounding roadway system or change intersection operational resulls presented in the February
20I3TIS.
It is our professional conclu~lon that the proposed 141 dwelling un ils are in compliance v.ith lhe
Navajo Apartments TIS dilled February 2013 . and all recommendations presented in that study ,
inc ludi ng supplemental informaI1011 , remain val id.
We trust that our find ings will ass ist in approval cf the proposed Nava jo Apartments developm~11I.
Please contacl us should lurther ass istance be needed .
SincP.rely,
SM ROCHA, LLC
~sultonls
Mike Rocha, ,sos. 10PS
Principal
•
•
•
•
•
♦ SM ROCHA, LLD
TRAFFIC ANO TR-.NSPORTATION CONSULTANTS
April 2, 2013
Mr. Ladd VO!Jry
Traffic Engi:lller
City of Engll1wood
1 O'lO Engle.,"Od Pkw'(
Eng !ewoc ,.;o 80110
RE : Trame Impact Study -Compliance Leller
Navajo Apanments
Dear Mr. Vostry :
FXHIBIT I
SM ROCHA , LLC prepare -~ h >'e]1, -~•) 2013 traffic impact study (TIS) foe Navajo Apartments and
the March 20, 2013 supPle ·,enlal ualflc signal oper~tlons information for Oxford Avenue and
Nava;o Street Intersection. lne basis lo , prepared information was Navajo Apartments proposing
to conslrucl approximately 130 residential dwelling units .
It is understood that the total nurr,ber of dwelling units proposed for construction has increased to
141 . Proposed site access !o Navajo Slreet remains unchanged from :hat presentP.d in the
February 2013 TIS .
Similar to the February 2C. I 3 TIS, standard traffic generation characteristics compiled by the
lns:itute of T;ansportation Er,~ineers (ITE) in their report enlitled Tri~ Generntion, 8th Edition , were
applied to the additional dwelling units in order to estimate the increase in average daily traffic
(ADT), AM Peak Hour, and PM Peak !-'our vehicle trips for site development. A ve~,lcte trio Is
defined as a ore-way vehicle movement fro,n a po int of origin to a point of destination .
Trip generation rates used for comparison are presented in Table 1.
ITE
CODE LAt,.'O us :;: UNIT
220 .trponments DU 0.62
I 2:303 AIRPORT WAY, SUIT E 200 BRC □MF'IELD, COLORADO t:1O021
□:13031 327· I 490 F":(3031 327· 1499
WWW ,SMROCHA.COM
Ml.lodd Vosvy Ap,;12. 1011
~~J~~.'.'f'8'....__tmfl~~=-~~~~u~~·'f1Jld~C~!~.1Ud~=~~~l?!~~L~~~-~ll~~-"-"--..-.,.--,_====~~--..,}!9!!.,
Table 2 illustrates projected average daily traffic (ADT), AM Peak Hour, Rnd PM Peak Hour traffic
volumes likely generated by the additional eleven (11) dwelling units .
in:
CODE t AND USE St.tt
220 Apart,ntnll 11 OU 73 .\ 1---------.... -.... ---:-t•--------TOD Reductoo• (·20%) 10 1
Total: 59
Table 2 summarizes Iha! the addttlonal dwel i ns untts will generale an in crease of a?proximala y 59
da ily trips with 4 of lhose occuning du ring the AM Peak Hour and 5 during the PM Peak Hour .
Moreover, lhe dlffemrr.e between peak hour trip generalion of 130 and 141 dwelling units resu lts in
an increase in traffic general ion ol approximately eight percent. This minor increase in site traffic
generation is not substantial enough lo create a negative impact to traffic operat:ons of the exisllng
surrounding roadway system or change intersection operational results presented in the Februa:y
2013 TIS .
It Is our proiessional conclusion that the proposed 14 '. dwelllng un ils are In compliance wllh the
Navajo A;lartments TIS daled February 2013, and all recommendations presented in that sludy ,
including supplemental information, remain val id.
We rrJst Iha! our findings will assist in app roval ol the proposed i;;1vajo Apartments develo~ment.
Please contact us should further assistance bo needed.
Sincere ly,
SM ROCHA, LLC
~sult11nts
Mike Rocha , rsos. TOPS
Principal
•
EXHIBIT I
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
For
Navajo Apartments
Englewood, Colorado
February 2013
Prepared for :
Roth Engineering Group
/853 East Arapahoe Court, Suite 2500
Centennial , Colorado 80112
Prepared by: ♦ "'~ ';:?;~'.:'.):'-C::: ". .,., . "
12303 Airport Way, Suite 200
Broomfield, Colorado 80021
(303) 327-1490
Project Manager/Engineer:
Mik~ Rocha, TSOS , TOPS
Engin .. , in Responsible Charge:
Fred Lantz, PE
Ref: 12-0921ClJ$
Navajo Apartments
Traffic Impact Study
Project Overview
February 2013
I. hi trod uctlon
This traffic Impact study add resses the capac ity, geometr ic, and control require-
ments associated with Navajo Apartment•. This proposed residential
development is located on South Navajo Street between West Oxford Avenuo and
West Quincy Avenue in Englewood , Colorado .
Study Area Boundaries
Through coordinatio11 wilh City Slaff. the study area to be examined In this
analysis encompasses the Oxford Avenue intersections with Santa Fe Drive and
Navajo Street .
F igure 1 Illustrates lncalion of the development site and stud y ,nterseclions.
Site Description
Land for the development accommodates a ligh t industrial building and is
surrounded by a mix of commercial, light industrial , retail , office and residential
land uses. The proposed development is understood to entail the construction of
approximately 130 multi-family residential units.
Primary access to the development is provided al the following locations: Two full•
movement accesses onto Navajo Street.
For purposes of this study , It is assumed that development construction would not
be phased and completed by end of Year 2015 .
The conceptual site plan as prep ared by Roth Engineering Group is shown on
Figure 2.
SM ROCHA. LLC
Traffic and T1a11s1X>rl<11ior1 Con sul/ants Paga 1
•
•
•
Figure 1
SITE LOCATION
'='
. )(£ii');<. -~jj•:•·'.; '-'r ''.'··'. ~,:-' '.>u .·i•<i~ ') ,:,:, c, r. ,:, '·'.J '-''-'$, '·'._•~••.•C c.,_,,~.-·,u ·f;\:;:
♦ S~• ROCHA, LLC Nava;o Apartments
Traffic l'npac1 SI\Jdy
Englew«>d , Colorado
Fobl\Jar12013
Figure.
SITE PLAN
Pagel 1
•
•
Na\'ajo Apartments
~'.;,,Impact Study
Existing and Committed Surface Transportation Network
Febr11ary 2013
Within lhe study area, Santa Fe Drive, Oxford Avenue and Navajo Slreet are lhe
primary roadways th.ii accommodate traffic lo and from the proposed
development. A brief descripllon of the roadways Is provided below :
Santa Fe Drjye IUS85} is a north-soulh Slale Highway having six :~irough
lanes (lhree lanes in each direction) with exclusive turn lanes at
intersections within study area . Santa Fe Drive also pruv:des far High
Occupancy Vehicles (HOV) lanes during morning and afternoon p~,~ traffic
hours . The posled speed on Santa re Drive is 55 MPH .
Oxford Avenue is a two lane, easl-wesl roadwa:,, ,1 ~ a combination of
Axclusive or shared through and turn lane config ·" ~t,ons. This roadway has
a posted speed limit of 30 MPH.
Nav;1jo Slreel Is a roadway similar to Oxford Avenue . Th ,s nonh-south
roadway provides local access lo the proposed davelopmenl and adjacenl
land uses. This roadway also has a posted speed limit of 30 MPH. North
of Oxford Avenue . thA street nama of Navajo Street changes lo
Windermere Street.
The Oxford Avenue intersections of Santa Fe Drive and Navajo Street are
signalized. AB other study intersections operate under a stop-controlled condition .
A slop-controlled intersection is defined as a roadway intersection where vehicle
rights-of-way are controlled by one or more "STOP' signs.
No reg ional or specific improvi:,menls f9r the above des~rlbed roadways are
known to hf! planned or commllted at lh ls time . The study area ~oadways are built
lo lhe1r ulllmale cross-section .
II is further undP.rslooc! that regional pedestrian connections are b . s:1.oJied as
part of lhe Oxford Lighl Rail Station area planning process curre1. · underway
between the City of Englewood and Ri:,giunal Transportation Dist rict (RTD).
Recommendations for pedestrian connection improvements are forthcoming .
SM ROCHA , LLC
Trame and Transporta tion Consul/ants Page4
Navajo Aparlments
Trame Impact Study February 2013
II. Existing Traffic Conditions
AM and PM Peak Hour traffic counts, as presented in the adjacent traffic study'
prepared for the Oxford Station Development, were collected at the Oxford
Avenue intersections of Santa Fe Drive and Navajo Street, and utilized in this
analysis . These counts were adjusted to reflect one year of growth and are shown
on Figure 3.
The Signalized and Unsignalized Intersection Analysis techniques, as published in
the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM' by the Transportation Research Board and
as incorporated into the SYtl.CHRO co,-,,puter program, were used to analyze the
study intersections for existing trdffic conditions. These techniques allows for
determination of intersection Level of Service (LOS) based on the congestion an<:'
delay of each traffic movement. Base signal timing data for ttie Oxford Avenue
intersections of Santa Fe Drive and Navajo Street was obtained from City Sta~
and used throughout this ana lysis.
The LOS analyses resL•lts ior existing conditions are summarized in Tab le t .
•
Definitions of Levels of Service are given in Appendix A, and capacity worksheP.t~ •
are providell in Appendix 8.
~
I \
I I I \1 11
k '
;
-
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERV CE I
LANE GROUPS AM PEAK HOUR PM?EAKHOUR
Santa Fe Drive / Oxford Avenue (Slgnalizeo) Dt3R .2) 0(49.7)
Oxford Avenue/ Navajo Slreel (S ignalized) 8(15.1) B (1B 1)
Ke\". Signa Mzed Jnlersectlons : Level ol Ser.ice (Con1rol Delay In secfvet-)
Existing Traffic Analysis Results
Under existing conditions, op erational analysis shows that the signalized
inter~action of Santa Fe Drive and Oxford Avenue has an overall peak hour
operation at LOS D. The inter ;action of Oxford Avenue and Navajo Street
operates at LOS 8, overall , in peak traffic hours.
1 "Odord Sta:Jcn . Trame rmoact AnalY'fils", FelS:,urg Holt& UlloviQ, Jutv 5, 2012 .
SM ROCHA , LLC
Traffic and Transpnrtlltion Consultants Page 5
•
•
~299/ 267
<-152/ 448
•
97
'
237 Oxford Avenue
1621249..!>
358l34t;-+
135/318-.
-D SM ROCHA, LlC
.-~~-NewjoApartmenls ~ ... ~ Traffic Impact SIUdy
Englcv.ood, Colorado
Februar, 2013
(17,8251
•-► 215/97-'
317 / 370 -►
118/192,
-l..1018
<-393/ 512
•81 65
I
ffil
North
~ ...s..
Figure 3
EXISTING TRAFFIC
Volumes & Intersection Geometry
AM/ PM Peak Hour
(ADT): Average Daily Traffic
Poge6
Navajo Apartments
Traffic Impact Study February 201 .1
Ill. Future Traffic Conditions without the Proposed Development
Normally, an annual groWIH r~'.!l ls appl i19d to existing traffic volumes lo accounr ior
projected increase~ f.,,, 'i,ir.~r;•·i.-und traffic for the short anil long term anaiys,s
h<Jri =tons , This ·;. ,ion•• .. , con&iper intersection opArations and public roadwa~
improvements pos ~.'.:1 , ·""''\ud to accommodate reg ional tran sportation demands .
To account for projected increases in backgr01 .. ,d traffic for Year 2015, a
compounded annual growth rate <If appro ximately 1 .59 percent and 2.54 percent
was applied to Oxford Avenue and Navajo Street, respective ly . These growth
rates w1:1re usttd to be consistent with t11e Oxford Station traffi c analys is. Also
includ ed in background traffic volumes are projected si te-gene rn ted traffic volumes
from the Oxford Station development No long rerm (Year 20351 ba ckground
analysis wa s considered in this study since the publi c area around Oxford Avenue
and Navajo Street is buill out, and the expected completion of adJacent
development (e.g ., Oxford Station) is expected before Year 2015.
•
Pursuant to the non-committed area roadway impro'lements discuss'on provided
in Section I along with Oxford Avenue and Navajo Street being built to their
ultimate roadway sections. Year 2015 background traffic condition ass:.imos no •
roadway improvements to accommodate reg ional transportation demands. This
assumption provides for a conservative analysis .
Figure 4 shows the projected background traffic voium1:1s, induding acjac1:111t
Oxford Station development lraffic, and intersection geometry for Year 2015 .
SM ROCHA, I_LC
Traffic and Tr ansportation Consultants Page 7
•
11 .,. ...
f
.,i
:ll i::i --"' ~~~
4 1 i I, • 167/257 -·
390138 1 •
1391328,.
February 2013
,.,,..-~,
ftuw. f ~ t :S 4i'i t lt'i': -:
---~/
t...331/;/\11
◄ 264/ 404
.--1241258
•1 t r•
~~~ ~-.. !~
Oxford Avenue
(19.3 751
◄-·• 226/ 102.J'
32713&!➔
138 /259,
Figure 4
BACKGROUND TRAFFIC • YEAR 2015
Volumes & Intersection Geometry
AM / PM Peak Hour
{ADT): Average Daily Traffic
Page 8
Navajo Apartments
Traffic Impact Study Febr ua,y 2013
As w ith E!X isting traffic cond itions, the ope rations of the study interse ctions were
analyzed under background conditions, without the proposed development , using
the SYNCHRO compute r program. Background traffi c level of service analyses
nisults for Year 2015 are listed in Table 2.
Derinitlons of Levels of Service are given in Append ix A, and capacity worksheets
are prov ;dEid in Append ix 8 .
r -~-·1
I
' ''' I ..
INTERS!:CTION LEVEi. OF SFRVICF.
l.ANE.OROUPS AM PE Ai< HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
Sanla Fa Dri ve I Oxford Avon uo (Signollzccf ) 01;,;:,Q) D (54.4)
Ox fc:•d Avonuo I Ncvo jo Str-,et (Signal ized ) 6 (15.6) B 116.<)
Koy: S'9n alizt·; lr,t e,sect ura. Le vel uf SeNU (Control Delay 1n sec/ven)
Background Traffic Analysis Results -Year 2015
Operatio n analysis for Year 2015 background cond iti on Indicates that the
slgn?.llzed Intersection of Santa Fe Dr ive and Oxford Avenu e experiences a n
overall LOS D operation during peak traffic hours .
The signal ized intersection of Oxford Avenue and Navajo Street co ntinue 10 have
on overall peak hour operation at LOS B, similar to existing conditions .
SM ROCHA, LLC
Tr affic and Transportation Consulla1ds Page 9
•
•
•
•
•
•
Navajo Apartments
T1y1fic Impact Study
IV. Proposed Project Traffic
Trip Generation
February 2013
Standard traffic generation characteristics complied by the lnstilute of Trensporta•
lion Engineers (ITE) in the ir report entitled Trip Gtmeratlon , 8th Edition, were
applied to proposed land use in order to estin 111 te average daily traffic (AD~'), AM
Peak Hour, and PM Peak Hour vehicle trip s IN 11-.e development site .
A vehicle trip is defined as a one•way vu i.J cle mr vement from a point of origin to a
po int of destination.
Trip gen lirntion rates used in this study IJft"; presented In Table 3.
ITE 24
CODE 1.A.NO ·USE UNIT HOUR ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL
220 Apartments DU 6.6, 0.102 0.408 ~.s ' 0.403 0 .217 0 .62
"'' CU • OMt l\nv u ,h,
T~ble 4 illustrates projected average da ily traffic (ADT), AM Pcok Hour, arid PM
,=>cok Hour traffic volumes likely generated by the prupused development.
ITE 24 AM PEAK HOUR
CODE LAND USE SIZE 1 IOUR ENTER EXIT TOT AL ENTER EXIT TOTAL
220 Apartments 130 DI.I 865 13 S3 66 52 28 81
TOD Reductions (-20%) 173 3 11 13 10 6 1b
Total : 692 11 4l S1 42 23 64
SM ROCHA , LLC
Trame and Transportat,on Consultants Page 10
Navajo Apartments
Traffic Impact Study February 2013
Table 4 illustrate that thB proposed development has the potential to generate
apr,roxlmately 692 dally trips with 53 of those occurring during the AM Peak Hour
and 64 d1J 1ing the PM Peak Hour.
Adjustment. to Trip Generation Rates
A development of this particular type is not likely to attract trips already on the
adjacent roadway system (defined by ITE Trip Generation Handbook as pass-by
trips). No oass-by trip reduction was taken in this study. However, the Oxford
Light Rail Station is located within close proximity to the proposed development.
As such, a twenty (20) percent reduction was applied to site trip generation to
account for the likelihood of transit use from a transit oriented development (TOD).
This reduction percentage is considered conservative .
Trip Distribution
•
The overall directional distribution of site-generated traffic was determined base 1
on proposed and existing area land uses, allowed intersection turnin!l movements,
and available roadway network. •
Overall trip distribution patterns for the proposed development -,re shown on
Figure 5.
Project Trip Assignment
Traffic assignment is how generated and distributed vehicle trips are expected to
be loaded onto the availoblo roadway network.
Applying trip di ~tribution patterns to site-generated traffic provides the s,te-
generated trip assl9nments shown on Figure 5.
SM ROCHA, LLC
Traffic and Transportation Co•·sultants Page 11
•
•
j ~i
if
~
cl'!
1;1 ~-t~/ 8
◄-2 / 1
,;-13 17
1s•1., ·-· 1 12 --6 ;:;
• ~i -.
February 2013
North rn .. .....
l~ e
I
I
~
Oxford Avenue ~ .--, /4
8 /2S,. •1 t I" ~i
~O.N -.... ~
E
Ill
1
:!l
Site Access ii
(Combined) +
-----------•••.. •1
J8121J "f
.S 12-.
ij
Figure 5
DISTRIBUTION
(%): Overall
SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC
AM / PM Peak Hour
Page 12
Navajo Apartmonts
Tr3ffic Impact Study February 2013
V. Future Traffic Forecaats with Proposed Development
Site -generated traffic was added to background traffic volumes to develop total
traffic projections .
For analysis purposes. it was assumed that development build oul would occur by
end of Year 2015.
No roadway Improvements were assumer! for analysis in the total traffic cond Ilion.
Projected Year 2015 tot;i l traff1r. volumes and intersection geometry Are shown on
Figure 6 .
SM ROCHA, LLC
/'raflic and Transportat,on Consultants Page 13
• 1671257..t
391136)-►
1391328.
February 2013
-!_ 3521 29 9
◄-2661 •65
•-137 1265 Oxford Avenue
(1 9,860)
•-► 12611 02 ..t
32 7 1382 -►
1461288.
iL11 ! B
•-,1()6 / 528
.;-11 /RO
Figure6
TOTAL TRAFFIC· YEAR 2015
Volumes & Intersection Geometry
AM / PM Peak Hour
(ADT): Average Daily Traffic
Page 14
Navajo Apanments
Traffic Impact Study
VI . Project Impacts
Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service
Februar,• 2013
As with background traffic, the operations of the study intersect ion s were analyzed
under projected total tr affic cond itions using the SYNCHRO computer program .
Table 5 summarizes total traffic level of service analysis results for Year 2015.
Definitions of Levels of Service are given in Appendix A, and capacity worksheets
are provided in Appendix B .
r -I
!
1 1111
I
L ,· : -
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE
LAN E GRO UP S AMPE~K HOUR PM PEAK HOU R ..
Scm la Fa D1 ive / Oxfutd Av~11u1::1 (S ig rmllzeU ) 0(44.2) D (54.7) -
Oxford Av u11 utt / Nc:1vajo Slreet (Siynal li et.l) 8(17.~) 6(18.9)
Total Traffic Analysis Results upon Development Build Out
Table 5 shows that the signalized intersection of Santa Fe Drive and Oxford
Avenue, upon development build out with conservative assumptions defined in this
s<udy and by Year 2015, will have operations similar to existing and background
conditions .
Table 5 further illustrates how the Oxford Avenu e and Navajo Street intersection is
projected to mainta in LOS B operation during peak traffic hou rs.
SM ROCHA , LLC
Traffic and Tran sportation Consultants Pogo 15
•
•
•
•
Navajo Apartments
Traffic Impact Study
VII. Conclusion
February 2013
This lrc1ffic impact study addressed the capacity, geometric, and control require-
ments associated with Navajo Apartments . The proposed residential development
is located on Navajo Street between Oxford Avenue and Quincy Avenue in
Englewood, Colorado.
As coordinated with City Staff, the study area examined In this analysis
encompasses the Oxford Avenue intersections w ith Santa Fe Drive and Navajo
Street .
Analysis was conducted for .::ritical AM Peak Hour and PM Peak Hour traffic
operations for existing traffic conditions , Year 2015 backgrcund traffic conditions ,
and Year 20 15 lolal traffic conditions.
Analysis of existinQ traffic conditions indicates that the studied signal ized
intersection of Santa Fe Drive and Oxford AvAnue has overall peak hour
operat ions at LOS D. Moreover , the signalized i~tersection of Oxford Avenue ond
Navajo Street ha. overall LOS B operations during peak traffic hours .
Without the proposed development, Year 2015 background operational analysis
indicates that study intersections will continue lo experience moderate to good
traffic operations
Analysis of future traffic condit ions indicates that lhe addition of site-generated
traffic is expected to create nc discernable impact to traffic operations of the
existing surrounding roadway system . With d'I conservative assumptions defined
in this analysis , existing intrJrsections along the Oxford Avenue study area are
projected to operate at future levels of survice comparable to existing and
background cond itions duri ,,g peak traffic hours .
SM ,~OCHA. LLC
Tra ffi" 1111d Tr a11sportatto11 Consult ams Page 16
•
•
The following infonmuion .:o n tie found in the Hisbwav CopacitY Manual Transponu11on Research
Board, 2000: Chapte,-10 -Urb•n Streets Concept, Signoliz,d lntcncctions and Ch ap ter 17 -
Unsii;nalizcd ln1cncc1ions .
Level or Service (LOSl for Signalized Intersections
Levels ol service ore delincd to reprcsen1 reasonoble ranges in control del,y.
~
[Jcscribes operati ons witlt low control del ay . up 10 10 s/vch . This LOS o;:cur.; when rrngressinn is
c:nreincly favo rab le and most vehicles :mi"c during the green phai.r.. Mnny vehicles do nN stop at all.
Short cycle lengths may tend to contrihutc In lnw rlel•y ••In es.
Uli!!
Describes opt.-rati ons with control dt!lay greater then 10 und up to 20 s.'veh. This level generally
occurs with good proL : cssions, short cycle le ngths . or bo1h. More vehicles stop llum with LOS A,
c:m sing higher levels .( delay .
uw;;
Oc s1.:ri hcs opc:rtlli ons w :th control del ay greate r lhnn Z') and up to J~ s:vdt . These higher delays m :iy
result from only fair progression , longer cycle lc:1g1hs, or both . Individual cycle failures rnny begin lo
appear at lhe level. Cycle tailure occurs when a giver. green phase docs not ~rve queued vehicles, and
overnows occur . The number of vehicles slopping is significa111 n1 this level , though many s1ill pass
through th e intersection wit hou t s1oppmg .
.!&Ul
Desi..1ibes operations with control delay greater than 35 and up to .55 sfveh At ( .OS n , the in flu enc,:
of congestion become~ more noticeable. Longer dtlay~ may resuh from some combination of
unfavorable pm&:-cssion. Ion~ cycle lcnc1h ~. :mrl high v/r ratios. Ind ivi dual cycle failures .1re frequent .
I.OS•·
Describes operntions with cont rol de ::iy greater than 55 ond up to 80 s/vch . ·11,t:se high delay values
generalty indicate poor pr<,gre ssi on 1 long C)'clc lengths, nnd high v/c ratios. Ind ividual ..:yclc railun.:~ •in:
frequent
!&ll
Dcsc,ibes operations with control delay in eA.cess of 80 s/veh. This le vel, considered un eccep ·able to
most driv~rs, often occ urs ,,:ith over s1::urauon, Lhat is, when anival flow rates txceed the capac ity of lane
groups . It rnay also occur at high vie ratios with many individual cycle failu1cs . Poo r progr(':ision and
long c~, le len gths ma y also contribute signilicanlly to hi,-.,1 delay k::els .
Level of Senicc /LOS) for Unsignnllud TWSC lntmcctions
Level of Service Average Conlrol Delay (s/veh)
A 0 -10
B > 10-15
C > 15-25
D > 25 • 35
E > 35. 50
F > 50
Pl ann ing and Zon ing Co111111.i nio11
PuOhc llr.:uing
C:1se JJL0!\Wl3•001 , .:101 S ~ilY :!JU SU.:l!t t~.lVolJ O ,\pJr:m.:r.:.s Pt...:0 )
Ma y 1,1. '2013
Pa:e I of C.
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
May 14, 2013
Minutes and audin are available at :
hup:l/www .enol ewnod•ov oriz/lndex .nspx ?paee = 15 .l
I. CALL TO ORDER
The r egular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commi ssio n wa s calk:l 10 o rder al
7:00 p.111 . i n the Cily Cuu11c il Chambers of 1he E11glewooc Civic Center, Chair °'rick
pre5 1di ,1g .
A b sent:
I~
Bleile, Koth, King, Welker, Kno1h (entered at 7:051. Brick, Kinton, Townley
~ish, Fr ecmir e (alicrnate), E,cused
Alan White, Community Develoµ111t:11l Directu,
C1 1ri~ Neubecker, Senior Planner
Brook Bell, Plann er !I
N ancy Re id, Assis t;,nt Ci ty Att o rney
IL APPROVAL OF MINUTES
May 7, ;\013
Ro th moved :
Kinton sec olllJe d: TO APPROVE THE M AY 7, 20 13 MINUTES
C hai r Bri ch. ,1s ked 1f ther e were any moditlCations or corre ct ior:s . The re were no ne
AYES :
NAYS :
/\BST,\IN :
ABSENT
Roth, Welker, Kmg , Brick, Ki :11on Townley
None
Clleile
Fish, Knoth
Motion carrie d
Ill. PUBLIC HEARING
~
CASE ZON2013-001 , 1-JAVAJO AP-\RTM[NTS PI.ANN[O U~,:T DEVELOPMENT
•
••
•
•
•
•
Pl:mmns :tna Zo nm~ COmnuss1on
Public Heat ing
C:1se '112ON2013·001. 4201 S NJY:lj0 Stl'CCl (Nlv:ijo AJ:311111Cnts PUD)
May 14 , 2013
rage Z of6
Welker movetl.
Bleile seconded : 10 OPEN THE l'UBLIC HEARING
AYES :
Ni\YS
ABSTAII\•:
ABSENT :
Bleile , Roth , Welker, King, Brick, Kinion, Townley
None
None
Fish, Kn oth
tv1otion ca rried
Mr. Roth no te d he wanted to make a st atement th at he sha res the sar ':le surname ;i s the
engineering fi rm on this project. bu t is 1101 awaIe oi any re lati 0'1S hip to them .
Mr. Bell , Pl arll'~r II , was sw orn in and p re sented th e cas e. I lighl'ghts c f !he propose d PUD
include :
• Rezoning fr om I-: Ligh t Industrial Distr ict to Navajo •\panmenls Plan ned Uni t
De velopmc111 lo all ow a m,xim:1m of 14 6 residential a;Ja rt ment units.
• !'ropert y is iocated mid-b lock on th e 4200 block oi So uth N avaj o St reet ,,nc.
Is app ro xi mately 300' south of RTD's Oxford Lig ht Rail Station .
• Land to the sou th and east o f tl :e subje ct propP.rly is zo nP.d 1-11 ight lndu s1r'.1 I
LJnc' lo th e north w~, rc:centlv rezon ed to 1h c O xfo rd Stat io n TOD Pl'D
Lane to th e west is not within th e Ci ty of Eng l ewoo d limits .
• The subject proper:y is owned JY the Developer's father and was th e forme1
location of his cal litter manufacturing com pany that move d to a larg er
fac ility in north wes t EnJl ewood.
• Multi-unit dwellings are not permitted m the 1-1 zon e di strict; p roperty cann o t
b e redeveloped for resid en tia l under this zo1 1ing .
• The applicant condu cted th e req uired ne 'ghborhood meeti ng 011 N o ve111b er
15, ~012 . Notice was mail ed 10 property owners and occupants of property
wi thin 1000 feet of th e site .
• Final PUD docum e nt s were subm itt ed o n Apri l 29, 2013
• Th, µruposed PUD was re fe rr ed to T1i-County H ea lth, RT D. th e Colorado
Uepartment of Transportation, the Ci ty of Sheridan , Xc el Energy, Ce ntury Link
;111d Cornea~!; th e,., we re no obj ec 1ion s 10 th e p roject
• The PUO would include il max imum cf I 4u resi de ntial apartment units .
• MaJonty of the pa rk111 g Is on the surr~ce with a p o rt ion tucl<ed und e rn eat h
the second story of lh e h uilrling.
• Site l'lan includes landsc aping and all new an d e xisti ng u tiliti es w ithin th e
property and abutting right-o f-way will be placed underground.
• All permitted i1 dustrial lLes must ~ease once a Certifica te of Occupancy i01
any resid : ••1tial or commercial use is issue d for any portion of the p roperty .
• Architectural Character, Residential Density and Setbacks were reviewed .
Pl imr1111g :ind Zon111~ Commmion
l'ubhc Heo r.n!:
C:i?..! ,ZUS20U-001. ,f20 1 S ~:n::j o S11·cc1 1~;W:iJD A~J1 111::n:~ PL:0)
~:iy .14, 1Jl3
P:ige 3 0(6
fhe maximum allowed bu1ld111g height ior residential uses is 75 feet . The
maximum allowed building height in the PUD fo r Public/lnstitutioi,al Uses,
Commerdal Uses, and Industrial Lses is 100 fe.et.
• The proposed Navajo Apartments PUD rP QtJire~ 1 parking sp~ct:e for each
unit, plus 1 guest sp ace for every 10 units.
• The Navaj o Apartme nt s PUD w ill provide I bicycle space for every 5 urnts to
be accormnod,Hed with bike racks.
• A lraitk impact s:udy was performed for the project . The study was rP.viewP.ci
b\' the Public Works Traffic Division ,ind COOT and they collcuned with its
fin d ings.
• Th e Navajo ApMtments proposes a rni11imu111 of 15% o ' tht:e property be
landscaped and over 73% of that wi ll he "living·• lanrl;r.ape .
• Park dedication fee will be appr~x imately SS •J,,JOO .
1?1) Q u es tions lrom Comm,rnol'.
• H ave all Staff concerns been tak en care d?
• Are sizes of parkin~ sµac es an bsut:,/
• Does properly fall within I o:)O fppt of a former landfill?
• Is th e r~ ""Y known contamination 011 site?
•
• Is park,ng alon r, Navajo St reet go111g to be allowed after this development is •
com;:iletecll
• Does the Code perta ining to landscapinB maintenance and rep la (Pl11P.nl
apply to this project?
• Why ,s it importan t to gram this f'UD now rather th~n wait ti ll the ligH Rail
Corridor Pia,~ is complete?
• Does this PUD meet the minimum size tor a f'UIJ 111 terms of overall area?
• How does the property setback match up with the development edge in
tern , of the pwpertv to th~ no1th ?
• What was the rPaso r, ro, inrrPasing the hei ght oi 1he sign from 25' to 55 '?
• If no work commences when would the PUD expire?
~ A lan White, Direc tor of Community Uevclopment was swo rn and stated the p rop osed
Plann ed Lnit Development, in terms .,i lane use and ,he den,ity proposed, is consistent
with the light rail pla:1 that the City':: co,m,lta n ts prepared . Tha: plan is unofficial right now,
but Staff coes plan on taking it through tht auopt,on µroctess dnd r11 dke it an official sub ·
area pl an· of the City.
I~ Bryan Elsey was S'\'orn in . 1-ie provided a brief background on his company dllU wlty
they cl>ose this site for an infill development. He then showed a PowerPoim prP.semation
011 what their vision is for the project. •
•
•
Pl:inn!ng and Zoning Commis sion
Puhhc Hearing
r 1s~ IIZON201l·0'.>1. 4201 S ~av3j o Succt (Navajo ApMtmc nts PUD)
M,y 14. 201)
Pagr 4 or 6
Commission comments included :
• Will you manage ~ite after completion of project?
• How will you regulate access to parking?
• What are your plans for snow storaeel
• Where will the 5 5' sign be located?
• Have you considered roof top gardem1
• What is the area of the building footprint incl uding the podium parki11g/
What is the hP.lght of th~ rorlium r;irking?
• Describe underground detention system .
• S,~cms to be a lack oi b icycle stora ge 011 site .
• Internal sidewalks seem narrow.
• Are there plans to increase water a nd sewer capa,~itr along '-!avajo Street1
• What is the possibility of a pede,tria 11 bri d ge ac 1oss OxfunJ Av e nue to th e
l:ngl ewood Light Rail Station?
~ Ka tie Sukals .<i, 1090 Urban 5 :., Lakewood, w;,s ,worn in . She addressed co11cer .1s
rega rdi ng the layout for the u,1d er gr0Jnd detention syslPm and th e p re sence oi a n existi ng
slo rm sewer s1•s tem in Navajo Street.
l?] Mike Rocha, Traffi c Engineer was ;worn in . He ad dressed qu e stions fr om th , .
Co mmi ss,011 rega rdi ng ped estlian ca lcul ,1 ti o ·1s.
l'UllLIC TESTIMONY
0J Peter Leising, 4561 S lason St was sworn in . He addressed concerns reg,1rd ing
pedestrian connectivity, turn arrow;, and the poisibility oi a pedes tr ian bridge over Santa
Fe . I-le ask~d abuul th!:! ti111eli11e for the Oxford Station project. He felt the proposed
Nava jo Apartments PUD project was a great improvement to the ar~a .
~ llr ook ac!clressed questions posed by Mr. Leising .
l?lJ Br yan Elsey summation . i,e st ated th ey are excited to b e before the Planning and
Zo ning Comnnssion and would lov e to do the project. He said he feels the project fits the
a rea and would appreciat e the Commissio11'5 ;upport.
Kn oth moved:
Bleile seconded: TO CLOSE H,E PUBLIC HEARING
AYES :
NAYS :
Bleile , Roth, Welker, Knoth , King, Brick , Kinton, Townley
None
Plilnniug and Zonin g Cam;N~sion
(•ubli c Hco.nng
C:,,\.: •ZOSWll-001 . 4:!01 S Ka\lDJO Stl'l:cl (~av:1j0 Apat1 ir.l·r.u Pl"D)
Ma y 14, 20 :~
1';1 £,e Sol' 5
A8SIAIN : None
ABSENT : Fish
Molion carriP.rl .
Kn ot:, moved :
King seconded :
~ Di s cus sio n
CASE ffZON2013 -001, REZONING OF 4201 SOUTH NAVAJO
STREET FROM 1-1 (LI GHT INDUSTRI.AL ) TO A PUD (PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT) TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL USES BE
RECOMMENDED FO R APPRO VA L TO CI TY COUNCIL Wllf·I
THE FOLLOWI NG C0."101TION ·
1. That the final Navajo srreetsc~pe secrion rn ~y Vi'l'Y
fr om Lile cu,/J ali x11 111 em. sidewr1lk wiULl1 c111d loca tion,
;mr/ a1m r.imerl /anr/1 cape zone 1hown 011 rh e PUD ; and
Iha! th e final stree tsca pe sect;on ior !he Nava;o
Apurtmems l'UO wil: be approved by the City Macager
or desig ,,ce in con1w1ction wiih the building perm it.
•
The Co mmissi on rnember5 slated th e pro1ect i5 the kind of devel cpmen: t hey wa:1t fo ; this •
area, lik ed the concept presented, takes us closer to our goals of having TOD develop men t
1he City's tr,i nsi1 slalions, pruv,<lt!> a11 u1;purtu11ity b r a difft!r1er ·I lypt! of lr OLrsirrg, lhe
.,eve loper is exp erien ced in this 1ype o f dl?velopment and is ,:,e righ1 densi :y and type of
pro 1ect needed near a lrght rail station.
Cornmrssion member's concerns i ncluded width 01 internal sidewalks, bicycl e storage,
uti li:ie~. street developmen t. pedemian cor1r1ecrivily and will public art he included in the
proJ ~CI.
AYES:
NA YS:
ABSTAIN
A BSE NT :
Bleile, i~oth, Welker, Knoth, l<ing. 13r ick, Kin ion, Townley
Nun ~
None
Fish
Motion earn ed .
JV . PU!ILIC FORUM
~
No one wished lo address the Commission .
V. ATTORNEY'S CHOICE
~
Ms . Reid had nothing further to report. •
•
•
•
Pl:inn ing and Zoning Commiss ion
PubliC' Henring
C:ise •ZON20t3-00I, 4:?01 S N:1vaJ0 St1'fel (N.ivuJo AP3rl 1nents rUD)
M:,,y 14 , '2013
ruse 6 u ((,
VI. STAFF'S CHOICE
~
D irector White stated the Mr. Roth's Citizen of the Year celebrat·on at the Malley Cen ter
was very nice.
Upco1ni11g meetings include :
Ma1• 11":
ll1n e 4th
:
:1111e 171h :
June 18"':
Cancelled
Study Sess ion, Breweries, Distilleries a11d Wineries
Joint meeting w ith City Counci l to dis cu ~, th e Comprehens ive Pl,11
Cancelled
VII. COMMISSIONER'S CHOICE
The membe rs congratulated Mr. Roth's appoi 11tm enl as Etiglewo,1d's Citiz en o f th e Y ea•
Th e meeting adjourned at 8:40 p .rn .
Barb;ira Krec klov, Re cordi "b 3ecretary
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONl~~G COMMISSION
IN I HE MAHER OF CASE #ZON2013-001
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS
AND RECOMMENDA TION5 FOR THE
REZONING OF 4201 S NAVAIO STREET
FROM 1-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAi .) TO A PUD
(PLANNED UNII l)~VELUl'MENT) TO
ALLOW RESIDENTIAL USES
INITIATED BY :
Elsey Partners, LLC
1532 College Avenue F19
,\-lan 11attan, Kansas 6f>S02
m~DINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF THE
CITY PLANNING ANO
ZONING COMMISSlr ,,J
Co mmis ;ion Membe rs Present :
Commission Members Absent :
Br"·k, Knoth, Roth, K:ng, ~leile, K.mtoi,, Townley, We lker
fish, r-, e e,rnre (alternate)
•
Th ·s 111a11er was hPard hPforP rhe Cit y Plannmt and Zoning Commi ssion on May 14 , i O 13 , •
111 1he Cil y CoC1ncil Chambers of the Englewood Civic Center .
Tes timon v was received from Staff. the jOplicant and 1he pub lic The Comn·,i;sion received
notice of Public Hearing, Cer:ifi r.ation of Post 'ng, a:1rl Staff RP.pr.rt from Staff, wh i~h were
111corporated into and made a part of the record of the P11b lic Hearing.
After cons idering statements of the ..•. ';,.~:;ses, and revicw ·ng the pertio,ent documents , the
members ,,f the City Planning and Zoning Commission made the following Findings and
Co nr.l us,o ns
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THAT :he applic~tion •,vas filed by Elsey parr n•rs, I I.C <Peking approval to rPznnP
4201 South Navajo Street foam 1-1 (Lrght lndu stna ll to PUU (1-'la ,mecl Unrt
Development) to allow residential uses .
2. THAT Public Noti ce of the Public Hea ring was 6 ivPn bl' rubliration in the
b1glewood Herald on April 26. 2013 a, d was on the :.ity's we bsite from Apri l 18 .
~013 through M~y 14, 2013 .
3 . THAT the property was posted as required, said pcsting setting forth ,h ·.' c.ate , time,
and place of the Public Hearing.
•
•
•
4 .
5.
(,,
7.
8.
!),
10.
11 .
12.
THAT pLIrsuant to the PlannEcl Unit Development procedure, a pre-application
meeting was held with Staff in the fall of 2012 and the application was ,eviewec by
City Departments and uth~r affe c ted outside age11Lie,.
THAT pursu an t to the Plan ::ed Unit Developmen t procedure, the applicant
conducted a neighborhood meeting on November I 5, 2012.
THAT notice of the neighborhood meeting was mailed to property owner; and
o ccupants of property within 1000 feel of the si te .
Ti iAT the final Navajo Apartments PUD p acket was submitted on April :.-, 20'13 .
THAT the PUD w ou ld allow a maximum of 1 ,6 residential apartme ,n Is o n lhe
property.
TIIAT the applicant will provid" 1 pa1ki11 g space fo , ead·, u11i1, plus 1 gues t spa ce fo ,
e'lery 'IO unus .
THAT the ap plican t will provid e 1 bicycle spac e for ,wery 5 u11it s lo be
acr.ommodated with bike rack s.
THAT th e traffic impact study was reviewed by the Public Works Traffi c Di vision and
Cl)OT; bo th cc ncu rred with its finclinzs
THAT Planner Bell testified the request is for Ihe rezoning o f 4201 South Navajo
Street from 1-1 (light ind ustr:al) lo a PUD (Pl anned Uni! Development) to allow
re si dential uses . Mr. Bell testifi ed to th e criter ia tre Co mmissio n must cons ider w hen
reviewing a PUD app lica :ion . M r. Bell furth er l e5 lifi ed th,1 1 SI,1ff recommends
approva l of th e arnendJJ1e11t with one condition .
13. THAT the l\'ava jo Apa rtments Planned Unit Deve lopment is in co nfo 1111ance with
Ro admap Englewood: 2003 En gle w ood Comprehensive Pl .~n.
CONCLUSIONS
I. THAT th e application was fi led by Elsey rar1ner ;, LLC. seek ing approval to rezone
420 I South Navajo Street from 1-1 (light indu strial) to a PUD (Planned Unit
Deve lopme nt) to a:low residential uses.
2. THAT pro~er notification of the date, time, and pl?.ce of t~e Public f-Iearing w as
given by publication 111 the official City newspaper, posting on the Citv·! website a11ci
by pos ting of the properly for the required length of t ime .
J. THAT 311 1c~timony rece ived from staff members, the applicant and the public has
been 111dde par! of the 1ecord of the Pul.llic H earing.
•
•
ORDINANCE NO.
SF.RIES OF 2013
BY AUU!ORJTY
COIJNCll, BD..I. NO 21
INTRODt fCF.D BY COUNCIL MEMBER _____ _
A BILL FOR
AN ORDIH/ .NCE APPROVING TifE RFZONING OF 4201 SOUTH ~AV AJO HREET FROM
I• I TO NAVAJO AP ARTME:-ITS PLANl<f.D UNlT DEVELOPMENT (l'UD).
Wl-ffiREAS, Rnir.c F.lscy and 4201 South Navajo LJ.C are rhc owners of the ~.:-c-perty at mid-
block on the 4200 Block of South Navajo Street between Oxford Avenue lo the Nerti i nd ,::,.,nc.y
Avenue to the South, olso kr.~wr. os 4~01 South Navnjo Stroet, Englewood, Colorndo; and
WHEREAS, the 4201 South Na "ojo Street sac consists of two parcels totaling 2.09 acres; and
WHEREAS, Else)' Partners, LLC s·Jbnutted an application lo the City to rC1.0nc the parcels
fiom 1-1 Light bdustrial District to the Navajo Apartments Planned Unit Development (PUO)
which aUows vP:ious residential, commercial and industrial uses; and
WHEREAS, the property is approximately 800 f~t South ofRTD's Oxford Light Ra.ii Static,n;
an d
WHEREAS, laud to the South run! East of U,c subj eel µroperty is zoned 1-1 Light lndl!lilrial
District and conlains induslria! uses; land to the North of the subj eel propcny was rec en Cy rezoned
to the Oxford Station Transit Oriented Development PUD which will include 25,? =itlcntial
apartment units with an option for mixed commercial uses ; and
WHEREAS, th, propnsed Plannerl llnit Devr.lopment (PUD) wnulrl ollow A maximum nf 146
resideotial npartment units on :he property, although the current building plan shows 141 units; ond
WHEREAS, all allowed industri•l uses shall cease and shall 1101 l,e gia:tdfathered uor
cousidcrcd legal , non-conforming uses upon tr:~ issuance of a Ce1tifica1e or Occupancy ; aod
WHEREAS, the proposed ,201 South Navajo Street Planned Unit Developme:it will exceed the
development quality standarrls required bv the Englewood Unified Developmer,t Code for
resident ial develor.ment; and
WHEREAS, the Plnnning and Z.Oning Commission held P.Jblic Hearing on May 14, 2013 .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COWCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS ·
~ I. The 420 I South Navajo Plarmcd Unit Development (PUD), for property locatcri in
the 4200 Block of South Navajo Street between Oxford Avenue to tl1e Nonb and Quincy Avenue
:o the South, ID the City of Englewood, Colorado, attached hemo as Exhibit A, is hereby 11pprovcd
with the condition noted below:
Thal the !inal Navajo strecucape section may vary :rom the curb
alignmeal, sidewalk width and location, and associated land•cape ,une
shown on the PUD; a.,d that the final streetscape section for the Navajo
Apartments PUD will be approved by the City Manag<1 or designce in
cortjunction with the buildin11 permit.
lntroduced, read :n full, and passed un first reading on ti>, 3rd :lay of Sep tember, 2013 .
Published by Tille as a Bill for an Ordinance in the City's official newspaper on the 6th day of
Septe:nbcr. 2013 .
Published as a Bill fur an Ordinance 011 the City 's official website beginni ng on the 41h day of
Septe:nbcr. 20: 3 fur tlu ,ty (;0) days.
Randy P. Penn, Mayar
ATTEST :
LoucPabin A. E:Iis, Cit)" Clerk
I, l.oucri&b.ia A. Ell is, City Clerk of the Ci ty of Englewood, Co lo,ado, hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true copy of a Bill for an Ordinanr,e, in1roclur.ttl , read i,1 full . anc passed on
first reading on :he 3rd da )' oi September, 20 13.
~ucrishia A. Ellis
•
•
t.;:;
!::·:.~-,··~
'::7:-:::
J. ·••·-·· 1~~;:Ii:
)
.
--·~
f ·, C,.\;;:.',f RI,. , . i J i,...,.._,,11o
• '.~-.•• ...... ,., I· r-rot.u.W "'l
I .'.' '[_i_ .....
:f . ~ L.L: . ·f-:1-
li :
t,~,
,,
jll ••
I . --'',1-~ -~.
.:, t'fl~'i(l, YlMlt;,,.O!J A!t'.litll J't,lf 5-)~IT,-tE A~I •4l/At,'IL'.(l_» ~C'l l.)N fJ,l,'U•hN~l11 ... .:.~u r11
FIA~ 6ll 'tJE !i T · H lE:Sl • lf1 ~•~10:CIPA{ fAE.~lfJIA N
.,,TY l.l• 1:tte'.L r\~0 0 Cl".'lfr, I" t)f .lfV.fW"-")F', "7.:i, 11: 1Y O)t O~A[lv
4:?\1 1 Sf)t/TH ll!o'JJ.JOti/'PECT
, .... ,-.... , -.... -• .. ~--. ~-.:· -· ......
~~-:~ ::.: -~•~:·:::·.:~·;':·~~-:~··~ ~.
··~ ' . . -..
-·-·•--.. .....--····---.. •-., ................. ······-~-. _,, ·-. ... _,.,. -··· ...... ,..,.. · .. ···--
.. •-, ..
.. .. •-•-... •,t ~ >N • .. <-••• ......... , ...... ··•·
I ... _
I
.i. P•A':.UOi 1..1-ir,1.oc.-.1eo,N n tl::!-iOU IHi:"5l Ol/,\RTER Of ;>ECllONIM f(lWIBl-llf' ',SOUTH
R,t.NUE &t 1M;$T Of THE ~IA I t-F-~tt.~11","L t,lffil lWt.i
C!'"(f!I I Ni:i.1.1 \','fl(~ ::OUNl "f ni: Ml,WAttOE S1AfE or .!O'~O PJ\00
,1;>0 1 SOUll lN,.volJU l>IHt-t-1
/,
/:
' !.·
,,,·
/" /,;
l /,
...... f
' I
t ··, □1
I 1,
I' i
I
i., ~.l >'CF l~"IClOC,\TEO 111 :1-16 'i0UT ><E.A$l ~U,\P TER C.J: :£EC.II ':>~ CM ~\N'!;MIP !,SOUi•!
~Atl ,,t 011~•,EST Cf' !Ht-~•,IJtt•ti 1fiC i,,,1 1 Ml.:•~l'Ml
€;-1~0" Ell~l F'/1':,0tl :·t.>'l tiTY ,)~ -1r,A IWIOE S l-'.l E vF Cl":k.~1:.()(1
41\lt !-(}tl!t 1N~•/,1.J:).!:T P:tf.l
•.. \II
~
i s
i
''
-~.)
~-~·~-
I
'4
/.P.\ACE.l.lFV,t.0 .OCJi TED ttl 1Hl SOt../';l,EA::01 UIJAi'lT tll e r r.1 C:llnl't 04; tOVm :",111 !,H\)U fll
1.,.,..._,!;;6~Wl hl lll lt,ESII0 11Pf\lNClf'Al.UERID!Atl
' fY o~ EtK.t.EWOOC CCl'J tt'Y ot AJM ... ~I +N., ~I ... tt Of COLCRAOO
41QI OOL Tl-tNAVA.1..• S t k l;E •
I
I
I
·/
I
I
L ___ _
1'20 1
:..lie '
J ·--··
1' ' .
~.;:;-1-.-!·
i
.. I ·-Li
, -.:JI I
.. -, '
'•J,,
,I
l>.J
.• '.j;..1
, I .. Rf .•-:· ; r--. . :h· ..
it / r :-=·-;;-;-: ::.a i r
I.
I
J: r T· r-:,.::7: --..
-, ,
I . " •' ' .. . '
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Agenda Item
l b , "Ill 1
Dq1,1rtmPnl nf P.ul , .m rl RPt 1P,1th11
I
11 c,
Staff Source
COUNCIL GOAt AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Subject
S[P Tr.ii i Cnn •wctlons l'ro1en
Coun ci ! Goa l: A Ci ry th al prC\1ck·!t d1,crs c-c.iltu ral. ~e crc.1 t1 1J 11t1: .111d l'nlt.'rt ,1iru11e 11t op11i:'l n u11it i ~s. Th is
cv11t1.u:t ,v.,:. p,c~t:nti:i d In (i)tmcil Jt th e September ·1, ~(11 "\ Stl •d• S")!'ii n n .
RECOMMENDED ACTION
St,1ff re conunen ds that Citv Council ,m.1 l'd. bv m o tio n ,1 cuntrll , t to th e IC1wes t ,i,-:ceptahlc bidd er. :\ic hdt·II
l o nstru ct1 on, In c. tor th e c,J nstru ltr c.n o(tl w ~~•ppl ement al I n\'1ro rmcntal Pr o1cc ls (~t·P) Ira,! t.nruu_•ct1 o n~
Prol~CI.
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
Th e Cit y i" prnpo~ing crn 1:,lnw1i11g tv.11 11t•WI) itl t-'11tifo .. cl tra il c •)1 uw: 11011 , lo .1c;s b1 I 1icyd1~ts 111 111akin)j
sea ml ess tramitio ns bct1, ccn o n-str r:d b icvclc rw tc , J n d 0 11 street tr ail s. lhe ~ngle w ood Tr.iii Enhanceme nt
Pro!eC I will pro \jide i111pr ov1..•d tr.1ih, •"'d 1..•nh ,m<e ..ll.C€'S ~ t<1 th t' 1.. urr ... nt 1,(111 s,·slNn 'o \\'ithi n Ili c l it,-·. Tr;1il
conn11r tio n imµm\~me n1 :. .Ht• p,o p usl·cl f<1r H os,11111 .1 At hll'tk (. mpl t-'\ f.1dj act•nt t o Enslcwond H iqh Sc ho ol!
•• ,nd F11 w ri,,,u 1 P.1rk .
A thi rd tr-1il <.:O ll llt·.•Lt io n p ro pn~.1 1 \\~\!. curn,idt:>rt1 d at Bell t\ i ~\\ P,.1rk I !owe, t.:!r, lh l!re w ere insu1ii cie11t fund!, I <>
Lu 1uplctc th J t th1il sc--.;m1.:r1 1
ijosanna Athletic Complc1': loc,1t c-d north u f illld ,1rt ja<..·e11t tr . 11 gl1..•\\00d Hi g h Si. ·,ool. Thi~ tra il
unhanct'm~,11 will µru\'id~ a d ir•~·LI ~lllt!!,.~ p o i111 to 11,c-Littl ~ 0 /\ C 1t't'" Tr ct .l JntJ tht> hi gh ~d1 u ul \\i th ll u~
~t'n\•0 11 AVClllh.· hik 1.: ,o utt'. Th b trdil p,, h 1..1d\ ily u~t•d h \" hi~h ~d u>o l st ud e nts ,Hld rl'S irhm ts oi the .1r ~.1 ,1 s ,1
tr.-1rsport ,1tinn corndor 10 ·,umcrou !> hLi sin e~se~ m th e ck,wnl o\\ ·1 En~k~,, ood ,u ea.
Emerson Park : l•)Cd t t d ,td j,ll L'111 1,, ll ,11t •,;, A, ,,,1111 • I 11k l · m ul l• t!111 i Cl,1,k ... 1111 S trr•N hikf• , :i1 1l f~. Th is tr,11 1
..:o nnec ti o n \\ ill :)rO\ tdP ,rn orf str t't'l hn J.. be l\\ e,=n th ,,. 1,, n hikt1 11J 11te ;, and Em erso n Park.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
fl ro 1ec t b udgt-t
Pn ,wr 1 Bi d C , ,,1
fl (•\i 111 F@r
f 111 L•r.,·ir1 Tr,HI C t.m rn •dum
H o -.dn n ,1 ·11 ;1il c·11 n1,•c 1t,-i n
I ,111 d,1 _ ,l pmg
Tr:,t ,tl Pr •..11i:•_t (, ,-.1 ~
Bi el T,1b11la 11 0 11 ~llt-t't
!\t.>n:11 1.>r.1 gr,H11\
55~.):-:;
c;:;11,flH(,
~ l {,3 85
$17 .Pl i
SI -1 ~:2 :-
S-l.llr
);1 i,/-'Xl •
City of Englewood Bid Tabulation Sheet
Bid Opening: Thursday, August 15, 2013 2:00 PM MDT
ITEM : ITB-13-010 Trail Connections Project
Contractor
Hosanna I Emerson I Dellevicw
Bid Dootl I soa I Field Trail Park Trail Park Trail
\'I N YIN Connection Connection Connection
! Appan,nl Low l;Jidder j
Total Bod E11capt1ons :
!!!chdell f~•lruction. Inc .
7001 S Culo,;11Jo Bh1d
--1----------l
~~llnCICC C1ly. CO 80022
Scoll Ridct.11 • Pre •micnl
·--t---+----+----r -----+-----+-------+----------1
lOl-25'2 -DROO y y $1027.00 J S 17.831 .00 J SU 222.00 S5D,H0.00
~~l;lnt!~.,.~~C IIOn.1n~ -r--== --+------t----r-• -l-j -·------•---
ll~d~~~;:;;l --=--=--=--=--=---------~--___ t _ --,------
l ouic. Worland -P,c~1den1 --t--· ;--~--v--r,::2::,-::_o::55;-_o:::o:-t"-;s:-;,-;,_-;-,;;..,~.OMO I
J 0l-2 78-8100 S:2.C .595.00 S6B .81D.0 0
l . & M EntNP!_ises. Inc ·-----
PO Bo • W
Br.,thoud. CO 60~!_,l __
~us Bebo -Vice p,,.s ,dent _____ _ -+------f----,t----+----+-----+--------t-----------1
JOl-447-7.C01 y y S18.S9l 87 I 524.5114 06 I S24 .261 ./4 S67.4J9.G7
ll,!;)111 1 Bros Concre te Conlr.1c 10 ,,-. lur. -----t---· --1--......, __ _ _ ___ ,_ ---1--
5400 lc"nysuo SI _ . --t---·-•-----J--------~
Oenv~,. CO 802 I ~
1odd1houU •E•Ou,~~•.:_ ___ =r=-+=---1 7 ----I I I I
J0J-456-11 98 i Y sn 155.80 I SZJ.964.50 I H U 2~.JD $71 ,IMB.60
•! ,1·,.,vi.1~..,"'.J'.-~•• 1:il l\•'-.l ,rel U1d 1·~:.,. r,.,, r)ep11::o :J H1:1hll•·.:J If! J).,1 1:, l1:1ol \;,)m:1-cJ H.•1 la!J •"'