HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-09-17 (Regular) Meeting Agenda PacketI. Ca ll l o O,cl er
lrWOLa l io n.
3 . fl lcdge o f :\llt:g1.w cc.
4 . Ro ll Call.
Age n da fo r the
Regul ar Meeting of lhe
Fn glewnnd Cit y Council
Mond "y, Se ple mb N 17, 201 2
7 :J 0 pm
[ngle\\oocl Civic Cen ter -Coc:ncil Ch,u n bc ,s
I 00 0 l.n r,lewoo d Parkway
E11 elewoocl , CO 50 110
5. ~or,5 1cl e r ,111on of Minut es of Prev ious Ses~ro n
1. Mi nut es irom tn e Regular C itv Co unc il Mee tin g ot Septe m be r •l , :?Ul :!.
6 . Recogn ition cf Sc hedu led Puhl c Co111 111 e111. 'This is an o pportu n ity i or th e public to address C i ty
Cou ncil. Counc il n,av ask qJestions fo r clJrific ati on . but th ere w il l no t be any di al ogu e. Please l imn
your p rest nt.1 11 011 to f1\ e n unutes.)
7. Recog n1 1iun c t U nschedu led l 'ublic c ~mm c nt. ITh is ,s an opp ortuni ty ,or th e public to ad d ress C,t y
Coun c il. Coun c il lllr'I V as k quesuons for cl.mf•c .:1 t1o n but th ere w dl no t h e c1 ny chal c guc Plt!ase 11111H
vo ur p,es l lll il tion 10 thrt:!e 111i n ut e:-.. Tu n e fo r umc.hed uled :)LJ L1lrc •w Omm en1 ma v b e ll1111t cd l O •l :i
rrn n ut cs, Jnd 1f li m cd, :;!M Ii be co ntinuer! t v Ci:-ncr\11 D i:;c uss io n :
C o u nol l~es pnn\e to P ubli c Com mer t
8 Comm ltnK,1ti :>n s Pr o c 1Jm.11 1ons, .:i nd App o mt,rwnts.
Pl..,,1.,.., 110 1;,, II ~•nu l,;1v1> .l rl •i.;i b ilu ~· ;i n d rwr-d ,it1\l l1,1n. ,11(1~ r r ~(•r...lCf'!., pl,,;1.,r, n ro ll f) 1lw <ity ,11 Fnr,lr•\\(m rl
f :!!H-762-:!-105I ;i1 k>il<.t •16 ho urr, 111 1dv,1nr~ of when ~el'\IC£'> ;:irP nrf'df'rl
f:ng 1ev.ood Ci l)' Co lm cll ,,ge nda
<iPjl lP ,1ht>r I ":' ,n·,
P~ij"]
9. Consen: Age nda Ite ms.
c1 . Appro\ al o f O rd1 n;m ccs o n Fir:i t Rea din g
b . A µp1 uv,1I u f O rd i11o1 11 L~~ v u St:!1...umJ Rt•ddi r1g .
C'rn mc-11 Ri ll No -M~ -A f)prnv 1n g 1hP .:.rc0 pt;m rf' o f a p l,u rn in g gra11 1 fr c::,l the Colorado
\,Va tc r Consc rvJtio n 130,,rrl fl')r i mpl cm c r t .:i tio1, 01 f'.ng l cwood 'o: \\IJ tcr Conspn.•.Hio n Plan
fro 1n 20 12-~():, l.
I 0. P11 b lic H ean ng It em s
a. A Publ1L H i::Jd ng lu g.i th er 1np u l on ll1t: p ,up u ::it:d 20 13 Ci t)' o f Ln tl lew.J od 0u dge t. (rle ase
no te a copy 0 1 the prop osed ~U I i U ty 0 1 ~n glewood th ,d get is ct va1lab lt' fo , \ 1e\V1 :,g 111 th e
Eng ll.!w ood Pu b lic Li b r ary d uri n t', reg ular bus 111c~s ho urs an d 0 11 th e City webs ite
h ll p //•.v\\'\\ pns,lc •\\01 1d 1.•m• n it•/)
b. r\ Pu b li c H edring 10 gal h er in put on Coun c il Ui ll N o. 4 i, a p rop osec bill to r an o rdi nance
rewo lllg th e Ox fo rd Siatio n TO D iro m Li gh t Indus tria l 11-1) to Pla,rn ed U n ·t D eve l op111 e11 1.
I I. O rd ir1c1n es, Peso lut io ns im d Mo ti ons
Approva l 0 1 O rdinan ce,s o n First Re adi ng.
Cc u ncil Bi ll N o. 49 -Reco mm en dati on fr orn the Co mmunitv Dcvelo pm en 1 D epa n men 1
to Jdopt a Bil: ~0 r a n Ord 111an c:e to vaca te th e 3400 blc k o f So u th Cla rkson Street. St aff
furth er recommends that Counci l set O c to ber 1, 20 12 as the d a te for a rublic I l e.:i ri n g to
gat h er p ub li c inpu t o n the pro p osed ordi:tance. Staff ~our ce: Alan Wh it e, Direc tor ot
Co mmun it y Deve lo pm ent .
RPc:,o l1ui nnc; .,nn Mo tr n n c;
Recom m en d ation fr o m f inan ce ,:rn d ,A.dmi nistrut ive Serv ices D ep artm ent t :> app1 ove a
~e~o lutio11 .-t utho n z1 11 g J tr ansfe r and supplement al app roprration o f $43,000 fro m th e
Risk M anagcm i:i n t an d Empl oyee Be n e1its r-u nd to th ti Ca pit,l l Pro1ec ts Fund for d H u111M1
Resour ces O racle Stan dar d Beneiit s Proiec t w hic h w ill be un dert al-.c n rn 201]. Staff
Sour ce: Fr ank G ry gl rwi cz , D ir erto r of Fin ance an d Adm inistrati ve Sc nii cc s.
Recommenda tio n fr o m Fin an ce and 1\d,nin istrJ tive Se rv ices D ep artm ent to app ,ove c1
resolution au lh o 11 21n g c t1ans i e r c1 nd suppl emen tal a pp op11ct ti o11 o f $~12,000 f1 0 111 Pu blic
Improvem ent I u n d t o 1h e Ca p ual Prniec.ts I un d 1o r th e Lmerge · .l.'.:y A l ert ~1ren Pr oJec t.
Staff So urce: Fra nk Gryglewi cz. Dir ect o r of Fin ance ,ind Adm inistra tiv e Se rv ices.
PIC J!.C n o 1c: lf yol , h,1vc .1 d1~,1b ilr 1y .rnd need ,l U\ih.uy .iicl s '.l r ~c ,vicrs, plc.1:;c notify 1hc Ci ty of (nslcwood
f'lOJ 76:! :?40~) al lc.i,,I 48 h<'ur ~ in .ichancc o f when :;crv1r.c5 ,1rc llCcdc d.
[nglcwood C11y Co uncil Agcndu
Septembe r 1 7 ~:> 12
P.l~P l
ii i. Reconi111end c1 1ion fr om Finance an d Achr 1nis1ra t1 ve Services Depa nmen t 10 approve a
res ol utio n auth ori1i ng a tran sfe r of S 120,000 (Regional Trdns 1:or la l ion D1s 1ric 1 G rant fu nds)
fr om l he General r tmd 10 the r ublic lrr p rovem en t r lmd fo r the Stati on Arca l 'IMH1in i; Pr o jec t
Sta ff So urce: Frank G ry~lcwicz, Dir ecto r of Fin a nn • a nd Admini strative Se rvi ces.
i\. ReLom1nend~i1u 11 1ro 111 Fina nc.e and 1\d1rn1 11 !tt 1.:1tiv~ Se rvice~ Dep~u 1111t:!1 t 10 d JJp 1uv~ .:1
reso l u unn ,1 ut ho ri z111g J l r.m ste r o( i,]00,00n 1rnm th Ri sk M.11Me 0 nu:1 nt F1Hl rl t n 1h e
Ge ne ral Fu nd. Staff So urce : Frank Gryg lewi cz , Director of Finan ce and Admini str a ti ve
Service.
\. Re co mrnen da tio n fr o m Fin an ce an d Ad n11 ni strati ve Serv ices Depa rtment to au th ori ,e a
{non •bmding) res oluti o n prrJv 1d1 11g th (1 1 ac 11ve police o ffice rs w ill be given th e opt ion o f
i:1,teti ng II t: Fir i:: a nd Poli u :: r t:11 s1un A~sud,111o n 's StJtewide Ocfi neJ Be111::l1 l S)stem ,:111 d
n e\, h ire .ic i h e poli ce off ic ers be i:.·nro ll ed in thC' Fi re ,ind Polic e Pen sion A~socia tion's
S1a1ewicl e Defi ned Be nefi1 Pla n anri 1he ICM,\-RC Mon ey Pu,chase Pla n fo r Po li ce w,11
close 10 new pJ rl1 c,p ,1n1s .is of May 20 I J St.1ff So ur ce: fra nk Gryglewicz, Director o f
Finan ce and Ad min is trative Servi c<?.
vi. Reccrnmcn d at io n fro m the Com muntty De ve lopment l)pp:u tment 10 <l d o p t a resolut ion
:1u1h ont:ing Cor11rn un i1y D cvcl o pm c 11 1 Bl ock G rant Ap pl 1c,1t 1on for FY ~O l J. Staff So urce:
Haro ld Still, Seni or Pl an ner.
b . Counci l Mem bers' Choice.
I 3. City Managei's Repo rt .
a. Moti o n approvin g the South Mell o D enver A nu nal Shelte r Opti o ns Me111 orc1n du111 oi
U n clerstJ ncfing.
14. C11y All or ney·s Report
15. Adj o u mn e nt
Please note 1· you h,l\e ,"I c11 sa b1hl) .ind nerd .iu~1h;uy a1C.ls or !.e r,,ces. p le,1,;e notil) th e L 11y ot lngle\,ood
IJ0li62 2405) ,11 le.is l -18 hou,s in ,Hlvance 0 1 wl1l'n !.CMC£'~ a rc needed
PUBLIC COMMENT ROSTER
AGENDA ITEM 7
rl!JNS€f.tE0l!ll!Ell>lP...l!J81!1~~~MMENiTI
September 17 , 2012
[P,l!E~SEll!iM]fjy..0l!J~IP.8ESE~if(.ffl~•T10}lilitBEE(MINl!JjljESY
NAME ADDRESS .t<:fF.m,W
Amendment 64 "l\uld rnah.c C \.do r.1d t..1
l ht..· tirst st:ltc 111 try to p1\llit frn 111 th t..:
ll1ga liz .1tl Ull ll r lll il f'I_I U:u w at thL' L':-.J"'L'll Si.:
or ii !--i.:hll drl'll ,
Amendmeni 64 wo uld rnak c C.s lora ch ,
th ,· 11 111\ ,1:it l.'. ,, h ..:1\· i1 1s kg.i i to g ro\\. lrii l1 !-<-
p11r1 ;111 d ~vll 11 1;mj1 1a na 1;,r rr·1 ·r c ,1H1 m :d l hl'
Amendment 64 wo uld make 11 lega l fur
an yn nL' twcmy -u!lt..' }\:.1r ~ (11' o ld er 10 pn ~ .. t's.-.
an d CU rl Sllllh.' llf1 10 llllC (1lll1 CL' of maf'lJU:111:1
fth c cq 111 v:1 lcn 1 1ll hU Jn 111 1s o r 1.:1~ht pans 11!
pd l brnwn,r.: . .,).
Amendment 64 ",1uld p1.·11111t o p c 11111 g
manj 11 a 11 :1 rl·l :1il .. 1,m ·,. f fll\\ 111 !.:' fr1 r ili1 ,,·-:.
m :m111°a r lllf'1/l );! r:1l·il111 cs ,lllcl 1t:s11n g fa,:1l1 IIC')
in your COlll lll lll ll ly.
IHlarms ou r ~hildren . .\fo n_1l1:11rn 1:, :Ill ndd 1l·tiv L· dru !;,
For c l1i ld rt..·n anli ynu1 1g ad ults. smoki ng 111 ~nj ua na pl·n1 1a11 L·1 11 ly
:1fli:c 1., hr.11 11 d..:vch,p nll.'11 1. 1111p:1 1r:-l~arnin g ahi li1y :111d r o n-
tn h111 c-. to dcprc"i ~11_111. Ad o k sl:l'111 s. an: rnon.: lik e ly lhan :ll lu h :-
t u (k,1.·lltp pn \hl1:111 s " 1111 r11 :1n j u:i11 ;1 :i b us 1.· :i 11d ,1d d 1c 11 c.111
Ma ri,1u :111 :i nhu sc acc tiu nts for (.i 1K·rccnt nft hc adolcsc1.·nt s
111 s uh:-.1 :1111.:t..·-.,bust.' l!L'at111c n1 prog r:1111 ~ in t h1..· U n111.:d S 1:11...: ...
Conmcts wi1h iecleral law. Fc ,kral law will
Cl)rl ttn uc h 1 h:1n tlk· prnd uc tio n. 11 1a n11 fol·turc. trnn s pnn attl 'll
a11J d1~1rih u1 io11 of 111anJuana in C. \,l,1 r:1do rq ;arllk .._s or th..:-
votcr~· dt·l.'is 1011 Pl\ An h.:ndntclll (14 T h t..' U.S . Sup n.:mt· ('t)urt
l,.15 nlr\.'.nd y m nlk it l·k ar lhn1 frdaal law supi.:rs1.:c lcs s t.1tt.: 1:rn
111 11 11 ~ area . If i\111 cnd111c11 1 tl-l ra ~:-.c~. Co lnrad11 ·, rt·ncat irn,al
rn :1r iju:11 1:1 usr.:rs wi ll bdit.:v c th ey :ire opt.:ra ting un<lL•r thl.'
prntL'r l 1P 11 of Cnlor:1 do law ,,·h1 k. 111 rc~il ll y. till')' wuu ld be
s11 hJci:1 to ICdc r:il l'.nrnin .11 prl1S~c u11 nn.
Promoies increaseo1 use. The nw rc a,a dab k
n dru g is . Ili c 1110rr.: li~el y you ng pl..'n plc arc to lt,c lhc dru g.
M:1nJ uan:1 US\' amun!; st u 1k11t !--alri.:ad y ,s 11 11 1hi.: n sc . S11 -:pc ns 11•11 ~
fo r drug v1nb11 o ns :it Cnh1r.1 do 's pub li c ~l.'.huo l~ innca ~nl -i 5
pt>r ..:c n1 o,cr tll L' pn ... 1 fo ur y..:ar~. c,1111 b 1<111 , l'n rclru g v 1tt la 111111 s
111c rl'a scd J5 Jl l.'ft't..'11 1. ,Hid r\.'1t.:rr a b lu p1..d 1L'l' 111uc :1,cd 17
1w rn ·nt 1\11 wng l hl' m<h l , 11 ln a :1h lt: gri 1up . :1g1:, I :' l o 1i ,
11 i" proicl'h.!d th at thi.: 11u11 1ht..·r o fr..:g ul ~,r 111 ari 1u :111 :1 u s1.;r-:
\\ill dl>tl bk .
I ncreases impaired driving. Arc nrd111g 111 re ce111
s lJtl ~t1cs . hcl\\cen .J 00(1 and :!ll lll . mon.: 1'1:111 -HJO pc l)pk \\L'fl'
kd k d 111 C,>I• ,ractn fr om car l.'r:l ~h \.'S niv o lv inf, :i dri ver who
wa s un dr ugs Srnukm µ pi ll 1ed uc1.::-. l'l 1o rd111.1t 1l)ll :1 11d 1mp:11 rs
d L'l·1-.u 111 111:tl...1 11 g \\'lrn:h \\ ill kad h> a sig ni li .::1111 Innc:I,;I.' 111
th1.· n11 111 l>L·1 o f cr:i -;hc.:; a nd d l':it hr.: dul' Il l pco plL' wlh1 :11 1..·
d1H 111 g 1t1l(k 1 thl· 1nll u1.·nl'l' 1J f m.1nJ 11 :-i na
l·or 111orc 111 1i.--.rmm10 11 0 11 th 1.· \\ hy l..:ga l11 111 g 111an.1 u~1 na 1-. Wr,H1 g fi 1r ( 'ol nra dn . and tn Jl1in
ihc g CO\\'lll g w al,11 0 11 :ig:1111,1 A 111 c 11 d m,·11 1 (v i , \'1,1 (www .\/otei\lo0n641.com
1-l™DI c.:,
Marijuana is safer than alcohol and tobacco.
Firs t, It's h.ird t o ar-g uc 1h.i t ono !.ub sl an c c thm w reck s
nnd ruin s mill ions of l ives is "s;ifc r" l han ;m o lhc r
subst nnc e lhnt wrec ks mill ru in s miltions o l livcs .
people who use ,1 lc(1 IIOI uo so mspc11 si b1y nnc, w1IhouI
l.Je com mg 1nI01ocu1er1. 0 1 ·c1i u 111t ~ to l hc po111I ot montnl nml
phys ical unum rrncnt I I0\\8vPr Ille prn n my rno1Ivu11:in to r
people who '-l!loi.:e m,iri111a11a r1.:o c a1 1011,11ly 1s lo ~g-'I ll1gh~
o r ~sto ned ~
I I ........ Alcohol and ma n1uana are not ·no s,1m,, I hey arc w.. conS Jmed 0 11d niclabohzed d fr1cn11}' by Inc !'Orly \lo<;\
Marijuan a only
hurls th e use r.
Ma11 1u;mo does.
111dccd. 11ur t
\/~('/',•
jl,lrhClJlilrl-,i
~d o l c:;cc n t :i ,
who mo m
stages o! :>r r1 1n
qwwlh iH1d
dcvolopm imt
rh;u mnkc them
OS J)l,"'C1 Ully
SUSC-:!J)I hh • 10
nc1c1,c 11or1
M R11111il1\a u r.o
or:,o t1m rn :; uoor::; l am1.y n n d tr,c nd!I
Consid er bi1b1t:s 00111 10 woru n wh:> used
dwIng p ,cgnancy and c h .'d tL;ll wh u a,a
ncqlccl ed and/or p nys1caII v abused JV
<1r u(.•usu 1g µttrt'nts Ma11Iuai1u usa al~o
1,;011t11 b u1t .. ::; to cr1111c 11 ml hmm:, m n c r:c nt
pco 111e M •t11JLF'\H il t.S<· hut!!', emplo yers ,
whoc;e compane.-; \r,s ;, p1oourt IvrIy .ind
mav he h••lcl 1f "•Oon -; blc ·o r w otn'fll'>
ca used ll·, mor1Iua na-1~1119 workerc:;
M afl1un nr. use hnrin1 tnxp oym ::s who.>~
rascwcc:.. nu • lhVt'l \.•(I 10 C:O'IPI COS'l y
p1ot1e111~ as:.;a 1.1toJ w11h mar11L1L1nt, u::oe
OO®on ~~ .........
Wrn111 ~ lr oir II:00oira11d!i!ll
1-l™DI c.:,
We may as well legalize mari ju a na
beca use kids already can gel ii very
eas ily and are goi ng to use it anyway.
~
C1111c1, n ancl aclOlt!'iCPI I1:; !ld110 nw1 d I co·1s1sIc nlly ropo 1: Ihm man1u~111 .1
Is less :1\;ula l ~e 10 Ihem tnan alco t'lO I and cI ga1e 11es Stud ies h ov e
s h o w n ro 1m11 m d lv lhnl lh4.! l ou s ti c cossiblc {I u u b u tu n c e is, the IC'l.l ~
l ikel y c h il d re n and a dolosccnts arc to t ry it M ari j u ono Is les s
n c cc3:ii b le :i imply b c c ou :ic 11'3 ,llc g nl Tt-crc ru e 1t11 ee m uIn d r ... e,s ol
!.Ub SlallCt! ahus,~ tl'l(I .idct 1cl en ilCCC',Sl!)l li l y SllClal <11 .. ccpl ,1ll1hl y ,ind
pc1cc1v1..>£I r1s l-. o l h:1 1111 Wr1en ncces:,11}1hl y a nd sou ,11 ;u.cc 111,1bI1l!y go up
and a pc·son·~ sonsc ul nsk coos do wn. and Itm 1s whc:11 11uu1Jle sr.::u ts
I r:v:·Ji:Yli·rf\Jl I Marijuana isn 't a gateway drug-it LUJ V LJ Ln.J doesn 't lead to o t her drug use. I-
C.:, A l tc,1::.t 1c n VC'ry l:11 9 c :;tuch c~ t.:oncl uclC<I mvolvr ,,g :ht'l uon nel:l o t ch1 l,11on on el
.itl olosccnts In sevorill counll u.!~ lltivu at1own !h OI l-.1cts wt.u USl? ·11.i111uu11 L1 <.11 0
2 -J tim e s more li k e ly 10 fi O on 10 lJ 5.e othcr su bsl nncc5 Wtule 1101 eve ry one
who ll505 111.an1L111nn w ill move on to oltlcr .~dairIivt:: su hslilnr.es . nearly nll
U5Cr<; ot COC .IIIUJ llld h nn(I hc:1 0 11 u s e d 11\(IIJU<lll.l lir~I i:t
I-I™ I Mariju ana isn 't addictive .
I' " M .i ri juanu 1~ b o th phys1c t1lly an d psyc holog1c.1 lly add1c t ivc , acc ord-~ In g to lhc w orld's l o p mcd 1c ol rc:;cm c he r 9 M:1 ri 1ua na u~~ 1!. 1·1e Nr.
, ,e a s◊n wh.., adolescents are adr i1 tt ed 10 -;,., ... sl a.,ce •use 11 ea 1ment 111
1118 U mltld S l ,l l n <; nm l the Ne :::' 1i•rt r,on (tJetm J d coh ot) ild Ldl :.. n 1c
.icln111t1..'Cl 10 , •,11 1J~I.Inc •u~c I1t•u1 111cr I1 11 1 1110 U ~ To d oy ·~ numjuun u I~ u.; ~::~c~:.:~~t~•i,:,:•:,~.::~:,,:v;,~.,~:::;:;'::~,~:l~~~~:y ,sup to 10 ,,mos
I>-D o w hat 's b est for C o lo ra do
Jo11 1 ll 1t.: I y l ll tu <J~f ~J l A 111 c 11 t.l rr 11.:11t 64! l ·u 11 1lurr 11u hu11 d.,out wlly lcyuht.Ht!l
man1ur1 na 1s Wron ~ fo r Colo rado and to con nec t w1:h l1 1e q row 1rn ; coaht•o n aq;i ns l
Arncndmen l 6'1 v ~11 www .Votc N oOn64 .c om
[ii) Sea rch "Vole no on 6·1'' I ~ (,1'Vo1c NoOn61l
luWurn l Tax ing mar iju an a W01J 1d
provi de m u c h-n eeded re ven ue
for the St ate of Colorad o.
Legallzallon In o ther
co unt ries has been
a succ ess.
t-c.:,
1--Thn ro'i. nn proof this io: tn1 A 1·
co r·."l 111ly hn ::;,,,·1 hocn U\c C.l::.c w111'
,1lc..ul 10 1 ,11 1t1 lu l.i.H.:t u 0 111 c u1111 1ry
sp cnc;s aboul $185 b 1lllon o·,
rne lrack Iec or c1 tor orvg Iega11zaM'1 n other coont·Ie ,; 1!, a
poo· one G,ea1 l3r 1tt1 •1,. Sweden an 1 Sw ,t1prlan c me
nmollg U oso tnrn tu vu lnec -und failed w1th-leqah1a 11an ~
(.)
f!ICO tlO I r<>l.i lf'd urohlorn s l axes 0 11
;::lrn t1n l -.~l"'c: Q~n.:.r.~1P. :ipp ,rw 1-
mmoly $1,1 5 h1 ll 1on Thnt':t o nly
10 % u l Ollf c u :s t :,; F.c1 c.1 , y t:<1 1, \,'UI
COLn!1y s pc,,a~ :i ?O O btl'tOn o n
IObJCCO I Cl~ilcd t,)rOIJ !c rn ~. taxes (!I I
l hft <;,!IP nl l n hm:r:n p rmh1 r 1~
gcn c ,::i tc $:?5 b illion Th:1 t't. only
12 % u l u u, cost~
I [ufvutJULJ I Our prison s arc packed
1 I , with nonviole nt mar ijuana
o Henders
Severi\l c;ta1e,;, tn r t•
give cItA1t on,; a1
Colorad o,
~n ll~e
Th e ans w er to the drug problem
is Increased prev c nllon and
lrtmlmtml , no t l aw e11force1n cn1.
rr cn1mcn1 s v11a1 10 ree1 11c11g ou r d•uq nr oo lc m.
Uul 1!':. o nl'I p;u t ot !he so lullon We need .:,
c h oice butwou n h;_m;h l aw on l o rcom o nt :rnd
111 prov nn hon an:i 1·c,11mcrt while 1cspc c1111g me
ncea tor laws 10 kC{)p au, ro aos ne1git>::irhoocl s,
1--
(.)
tra lhc 11ckot~ •0 1 1J<J :,.,ur.s,on ol
m .:mp :.in;i u nllc r c11 rt/l111 ,:11n o un:-:
LC$5 than 1 '!o of the stat e's
prison population 1s 1nc;irccratcd
fo r m nnjuana offon :;cs -111cl ud nq
l;1 roe•scr1I e der1le rs ond Qcw,er,;;
The-re-tire mor e pt'ople m pri~on
fo r r epeat l r.1 !1 1c o lfcn:.cs th .:m
rn nrijunnn o ff e n ses
I™ I The "War on Drugs " ha s tailed .
if:
► D o whot 's bes t for Col orado
I-
~
i:2:
Join Iha light to defea t Amendment 64 ! For tn !01mc1 11on
nbo 111 wh y l11 gt1 h1111 y 11 m11J u ;:1r1n 15 W r ?n!J fo r Colo rn do
,.ill d 10 co ·m ccl w ith 111c yruwmu ~u ...t h1tv1 tl iji:l tn ::,1
A111e nclr11 Po 11 1 64 , vis I www.Vo te N o0n64. ~o m
Nntionn l nnd s l,1to dru g polic ies
h :wio mrlu r.:crl r11ir n:lttrrn'-. <truo
U!)C by 50 % H\ the 11.1:.1 1 40 yc1113
Dr ug JoI,c10 ::, nave t1dp•!C1 cont 111n
c.:ocrnm.: use IJ (1 6 ~ .. ol 1t1c lJ S
/)OJ)u ldl!On , mett)a nm ·,etn1111ne ust:
•n O ?% t"l nr1 tiPr'l,r '-P tn 1 n I ".,,
OOW on ®~
~ rn Se~i rt:11 '/ul~ r,u uI1 ,I" : ~ @ ,IuI(.!NoOr 1G--l Wll'®llll\g] ir®IT {C:!IlJ!®ITciJJ(di(ID
Children Will Pay The Biggest Price For Marijuana Legalization
OOW on ®~ ...........
'lflfll'IID!JlllB) lr'l!DU' !CIIDIIIDU'al«fil!D
C> Amendment 64 would:
n,akc Colo rado Hu! only s tate
where it 1s leqal 10 grow. tiansport
and sc U re crca honal mariI11r1 na
C> Amendme nt 64 wou ld:
mr1ke 11 legal to , anyone age ;:, I or
n1r1,,, In IYl'-"""'" ;m(I f"')n i;tunr ur
1:i one ounce ot ma o1uana That 's
the cqwvnlcnl o! 60 jomt9 n, c 19 t11
pans c l po t brownies.
C> Amen dment 64 would :
permit the opw1 1ng of ma 11Iu ana
101;111 stores . growing lar.1 ht 1es,
m:u 111l;irl t1fl flfJ l;ir1 l1fi f1~ ,1 1l(' !f1C.IH1Q
ta c11111e!> rn yo11 , co mmurn ty 11
would g,v,J m .in1u :H1:1 pr oponcn1c
l 'H.1 OJhl t·J ma,kel ::ind advt•ft1S.J
rrlU IL! ..iyy11;;1~::, v~ly tu yuu Jrn.l Y~U I
cna 1c1,en lh i:Hl they Hl 1e(ldy d:.>
C> Am endrnenl 64 wouh.J :
_ mak:e 11 tou uhcr lo · you a rld your
Chi d to i'i\'O ld rnan,uana Sr Pokers
tn pu::it.c plr\Cf~. suer, cts park.s r1n d
<,1(10WJl),.s
C> Amendment 64 :
1s backr.d by neap c who alO 111010
concerned with lhe I gnt ol ddll IS
I'.) uc;r> flO I /(H :,lp~~urc l hnn 11 11)
r.gt1 lf al c h1lclrr 11 to grew up ,1s
h:c u~ pc.:,s 1blc l1oin 11le rim m s 01
su hsIance use ;:\nd add1cI1cn
Kids cou nt ori act ulls to lc ac and yuioc rcspor1s 1bly I hey coui1: on adults to keep
thc ,n healthy aml sa le
I "[Flh1 1na m anIu a na lo r rec reational use rs 11 ·1 11gh1 , 1espon s,Ule 01 healthy
1t1s1o ad, it's ,rroupon s iblc a nd r ccklcs!i p.lrtlc ularly 1n Co lor.:idri. which o.l rcady
lea ds th o na11011 m ,idotesccnt 111an1uan a use and 1s a'Tlong sl ates th.:tt pro vide the
least hind n g to s upport c hild fflC 11t a l health :":f'I VICO S
1~vc11 11 a ct11l d doesn't use the dI ug, lie o r she 1s ollon 11cgatI vc ly allected by 11
CtuhJu.:n c:rc hurt Uy ar ug •a busmg 1el t1 11vos a·1d lc1rn1 1y fr iend s. Tt 1C!y are
the v1 chms o l acc ,clent s 1111d nc~lcct -------------
Th PH r l;ic.c.inoni!:> ;met sc hools ar1;1 d1srup1ed by d ru g -usin g st udent s Since 2009 . the
s,,..,1 ol the boom l or Coto,aclo s rncd1 ca l mar ,1uana mllu s11 y. suspc·1s1ons lcr drug
v ola I1011 s at Colorado pub lic sc hools have i ncrease d 45 percent. ex pulsions fo r drug
v 01;:l' or~ hc1v e inc rea se d 3S p er ce nt .1 nd rn lorr:1 1~ to law c n!orcc mcnl hove
inc reased 17 percent
So Whftl ? Your kid IS a good kid and
has n't been m,pc lled or suspc nllcd "
Wull, c1II o r 11 10:.e 111l 1c r t,\U ll•..:•H~ ~hll
aff ect vou· chi ti A s 1he Nauona!
Fcluca 11on Polley Cen ter reports. higher
ra te s 01 ou 1-o t sct1001 suspe nsums
co rrnl;\lr• w1Ih !own, nr.h1 AvP rni:>nt
s:ores sc tl oo lw1de
Studies show iha1 kid s wh o don't
smoke m an1u ana before lhe age ol 18
are alma~! •o ur h 'l'les more hkcly 10
gr adur1tc !r om h1g schoo l and co ll ege
111a11 1hose who do \l'Jt 1c11 co111 111 un ·:~5
r1 1r1 l-.t' llldllllMl k l lf lt ll U l1t:t:C~~1t,le ,,nd
:icc o111,1b l1• I hoy re:attv turt kids
chn ncc~ cf acadcr·,1 c succr-,ss
C> Do what's b es t f or kids .
Con nect to learn mo re
Join lh e tig ht lo d elc;i! Amendment 64 1 For mt orma hon aboul why logr1 I zmg
Irari 1uc:IncI I~ Wrong lo, Co luado. r1 nj 10 ::o n:1 ert wu h tnc giow 1ng coa huon
a9m11sI Amtmomer l f,4 vIsI1 www.Vo t e N o0n64.com
Here's Sc :ence iVlarijuana-Legalization Proponents Don't Want You To t<no1111
Th e cllrnudes an d bet,aviors ol
r1 rlt1l1 s hrtV A ;i p rn frn inrl 1m r>r1 r.1 o n
kid s . W I1e1, ad ult s make add ictive
substances more accesc.1 b1c a nd
accepta b le . ch ild re n are m o re like ly
to u se th em each year. 60
percent of all new ma nJu ana
users a re L: 1der tli e a ge of 18 .
A legalized m ari Iuan a industry wil l
h r!VA ;i n lnCf!rlh VP. l o market lo kHiS,
ju st like th e cigarelle industr,• did
Tl1ey 1ncl1Jde t11e Co lo rado Child
;in rl A rlo lP.sce n1 P syc t11a 1n c S o ciety_
th e Colo r ado c l1apter of t11 e Arn en •
can A r m1Pm y of Pr:i r1iAtn r.s ;inrl th n
Rocky Mo•Jnt a In So c1eIy for
Ad nlesccnt Ml"'rhr.i ne
0 0 0 0 0 0
The major medica l o rg anizal•o ns 111
Colorado th at represen t th e inte r -
ests of kids oppose th e legalizatio n
of mari1uana fer recrea ti onal u se
0 0 0 0 0 0
He re's wh at hea lth ex perts kn ow :
Mariju:ino is addic t ive C!:;pOC 1.'.llly to , k.1d:. The hu man
1Jr;;t 111 dues11 ·1 fu lly 111c1 1u r~ 11 111 11 ci lJ uut til t! dytt ul 25 . Al1u lec:;-
cePIS are in crucia l stages ol b rain cl evelop rn ent th at make
th em especiall y vu lneiahlc to ad dic tive subs;ances . Adol es-
cent marijua n a u se can porma n e ntly dama ge t h e brain's
wiring One i11 ~ix t:h 1l1J rtm u11tl t!1 1t u~ ~•y e ul 18 w tio try
mar 11 ua na becomes add1c 1ed to 11.
To da y's marijuana 1s mo re aC d1 ct1 ve th an eve,. Man 1ua na
today 1s up to 10 times m o r e p ot ent tt-ar rrar11uana used m
1he 1960s
tcgal1zing a substance e ve n fo r people 2 1 and over
incr~ascs it s u s~ am o ng m inors. Adolesceru mt1r i1u cma
use m Colorado has rocke:eo since the start at lh e boc m ot
lh1s state 's m ed 1ca 1 ma 111ua na in dustr y •n 2009.
Adolescent marijua na u se is as socir1 ted w1 !h p sychosi s,
inc lu di ng schizophren ia C h1Ir1rcn whn II SP mmII11 ;m ;; Al
least dr.it1le the r rr :.k ot d clu::.1on::. a nd 1,all uc 1nat 1011 ::. that
mtty surlace dS cxircme parn noia an<I anxiety ancl d oesn·1
go away
/\do lor.cen t man1uan.1 ur.P ,s assoc,;1 ted with problems wit h
m em o ry ~nd illlentio n t1 1c,1 I t.:dll \:J~l h>I y1;:c:1::i -d11tl 1ony
al1e, a kid slops us ing . Ever: short -term use can have
!dc long c f'cct s
Mar1 Iuana use increases th e chances of sc h ool failure
a nd dropout Stud ies show a perso n who coes n 'I use
ma11 Iu ana befo re tht: age ot 18 1s more likel y to earn a high
school degree a nd 91 act ua te lro rn co ll ege thrrn someo ne
wh o does
Man1 uana makes com mon hea lth probl ems in childhood a rid
ado lesce nce worse Mari 1ua na 11 <..P. cAn h P 11J hlPn p,ohlP.m!=;
sur.h as depression , anxiety, asthma and Attention
D efi ci t D isorder
Kids who u se rna1 11ua na arc 2·3 I me s more like l\' 10 11 S'J
other d rugs. mcludmg cocaine, heroin and t obacco.
Ma111uan.:i use con t11 bule •, 10 a w ide array a l acc1den1s-il1 e
leading ca u se of death among c h ildre n an d ado lescents
~rn®~®~ T hat 's right, pass it a round!
~
ij~ITH(g) iFllDIT fGllDillDlr~mlllD
-~,,,
The Colorado Depanme nI at Educa 11on has proa uccrl
111a l e11a ls to expl ain why ma r1 1u ana especiall y harms k 11s
Lt:a , u mu, u by vis 111ng
w ww.cde.s tatc .co.us/OropoutPreven t ion/Ae s ources.htm
or scan this code u sing yo ur Sm art Ph one -----s>
I ~ 00 [!;3 Wu1IlwQ] lliG' ~0 I
Amendment 64 Negatively Affects Colorado Busin·ess
What Is •
Amendment 64?
Amendment 64 would :
1> Make Co lorado the firs t
sta te to try to profit from
t11e leg alizat ion of marijuana
at t he expense o f it s
c hildren .
I> Make Colorndo th e on ly
state where it is leqal to
grow, transport and sell
mariIua na fo r recreational
use.
1> Ma k e it lega l fo r anyone
2 1 years or o lder to
possess and co nsume up
tu une u u m;e o f marijuana
{t he equivalen t o f 60 joi nt s).
I> f'errrnt open ing m arqu ana
retai l stor es , growrn y
lacilities. manufacturing
fa c ilities and tes ting
facilities in your
communit y.
OO@ on @~
~
ffilll'@llll~ lri!Dll' ~@D«Dll'ci!lldll!D
Pai d !or by Smart Co lorado ~•l •
MEMORANDUM
TO:
SUBJECT:
Colorado Employers
Amend ment 64
Ame ndment 64 "drasti r. 11
take ac tion against an em;,oy curt~ls an en1p luyer 's righ ts l o
marijuana.•· yee w O has tested positi ve for
Amendment 64 makes it unclear wheth r ..
te rm ina te ernployees fo r off-th _. e emplo yers cou ld
e Joh use as they ca n now ...
Amendment 64 allows "an ern lo .
positive the d · 1 aft . . P yee term in a ted tor tes ti ng
' er rnge s tr on -ore . later .. " to "s f . ve n ,everal days or week s ue o r wrongful termrnation."
Amendment 64 "is at odds w ith the -
Wo rkp lace A c t whi r.h is t in tent of the Drug-Free
contracts go only t~ em ~ e ns ure thal government g rants and
Payers who don't tolerate drug use.''
Amendment 64 places "Colorad .
competitive disarlvan ta . . . 0 employers rn a d ras tic
have not legal,·ze· d m .. ge v rs -a-vrs employers in states th at
a rrJu ana_··
Amendment 64 would bt~ a DISASTER
for Colorado Employers ...
RectU l he full memo on the A
eso urccs page at www . Vo ro NoOnfitl rom
► Join the Metro Denver Chamber of Comm erc e, th e Colorado As socia tion
of Commerce and Industry , and busine sse s ac ross th e stale ,n the fight
10 defeat Ame ndmen t 64! Fo r 1n forrna t1on abou t why leg ah21ng mari1uana 1s
Wrong for Co lorado. and 10 con nec1 wi th the growing coall'.1011 aga inst
Am e ndmenl 64 . vIsI 1 www.VoteN o 0 n64.com
~ Searc h "Vme no on 64" I ~ @Vo teN oOnt,;a
VotcNoO nGA com
Re s olution Opposing
Amendment 64
Legalization of Marijuana for Recreational Use
WHEREAS , Amendm ent 64wou ld make Co lor.111 0 thP firc;;t c;;ta rc, in th e 1/niteci S t.,u Pr. to lega li ze
marij uan a for rec rea ti onal purp oses; a nd
WHEREAS, Am endm ent 6 4 w ou ld all o w anyone twcnly •on c yc.-:irs or older to poss ess and conr.um e
up to one ounce of mariju ana; and
WHEREAS, Amend me nL 64 would pennl t openi ng marij uana rel.a il sl ort!s, gruwin ~ faciliti~s.
rn :muf.icturin g fo cili tiec; ;rn d Le.c;tinc focillt ics in our co mmunity ; an<l
WH EREAS , Am endm ent 6' co nfli cts wi •h fed era l law and jeopa rdi zes fed era ll y fund ed proj ec ts
becaus e dn.i g·frcc w ork plac e ~cquirt:ments may not be met; and
WH EREAS , passage or Ame ndm ent b4 would res ult in in creased use or marij uana, ha rmin g o ur
children and lh e edu ca lion al environm ent in Culo rdtlu ; aruJ
WHEREAS, passa ge or Am endm ent 64 wo uld hann Colorad o's image as a hea lth y place t o liv e,
work a nd raise a family: a nd
WH EREAS, passage of Amendm ent 64 would underm ine workpl ace sa fet y program s, expo se
worke rs to an in creased ri sk ofinjury and increases liab ility to empl oyers; a nd
WH ERE AS, pa ss age or Amendm ent 64 would put Co lora doan s in da nger or inc reased impaired
drivi ng: and
WHEREAS, pass age of Am endment 64 would mak e Colorado the fir s t state to try to pro fit from
legal izatio n or marijuana at th e exp ense or its children .
NOW , THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED THAT :
__________________ opposes Am e ndm ent 64 and t he lega li ,.anon or
in ariju ana for recreati onal use an d su pports lh e Na on 64 camp aign to dele at thi s harmful meas ure un th e
Novemb er 20 12 ball ot.
Name /O rgan i1.a tion Date
Titl e (i f app lica bl e)
Please email compl eted resol ut ion s to in fo@VoteNoOn 64 .com or fa x to 303-5 92-5 460 .
•
•
•
ORD INANC F 0
S1·1{11:S ur 2IJ 12
ll\' AL'T II ORll Y
(;()LJ C II 111LI NO -IS
IN I ROIJ UC EU I'll' CUlJN( IL
MEM HER \\I OO DIV .'\JtD
AN OIUll N,\Nf'F ,\I ITIIORI /INC ; Tiff i\CC F I' J'/\ C F,. F T H I-\\I A J'l-'R CO\JS ERV AT ION
PL AN N I (i GRA NT A IV ARDl::D ·10 TII E CITY OF ENG LFIV OO D. COi.ORA DO BY TII E
ST ATE OF l'OI O R:\1)0 DFl'AR l'ME NT or LOCA L AFFA rR S
\V l lERE :\S, ,, ata c011st:!r \t1 l tC\ll plans art' req u1recl under th e \\l.i1 c r Conscrvau on Ac t ci f :!00 4
fo r c11 111!cs thJt seek fu 1:t 111:i:1l a i,S 1'-l:tnc" fro m the Co lor:-id o \V,u cr l'on•,cr ,,11 10 11 Board (l \V Cn),
an~I
\VI lf ·K.E,•\S. lhc \\'all'r consc n ·;111 on pl an prcw1 dcs n pro lil c of th e ex 1st mg ,,·,ucr suppl~
sy~te 111 , 1d!!11t 1fit:s \\,Her ,O\m.:c, and li mll:H ions. f!utl11H:s w al er costs and pn c11 1g stni ctu rcs .
revi ew" c,1s11 ng p o h l.':1cs nnd J(;\'\C \\!-,,.,1 1.·1 cvn ~c rv .111 0 11 ~11.,11 , it1c:-.. ,11 1J
\Vl l r:R EAS . 1hc (,11 y of h1gk wood !-ubmrne d n p lanning g 1 :i nt :1pp l1 c:1 11on 10 the 'olo r::i do
\\",ll c-r C n n ,1•n ·:•!1 n11 Hr,;1rd (C '\\'CH ) fo 1 ll ll' :11 110 11111 l'f ~(, ,000. and
WI IEl{E A S. the C11 y of EnµIC\\Ood ha s bt't:n award~d th e C \\'CB Plmm1n~ G 1.i1 11 in th e
nrn ount of S4 6 .J 16. an <l \\ 11 h 1hc City's m:1.1ch 111 g $20,000 fon ds prov id ed \\'Ith rn -k111 d serv ices
wi ll c1..wcr 1mplcmcn1 a1io11 u f En glc wo od ·s Wat e r Co nsc rva:10 n Plan sp ::uuung ten ( 101 yc:'l rs
frr,m ~t)l 210 :!l :J : ,1nd
WI 11 -:R l~AS, there :m; no fr dcr:i l fond s bcmg use d for Fn glc wood 's W:tt e, Conscn a110:1 Plan ;
NO W. T II FRl'FORE . Ill· 11 ORDA INED l3 Y TIIE C IT Y COUNC IL OF 'I HJ , CI T Y OF
ENI.i i J--\l'O <>D. C'CJLO K.:\J10 . I HA I
.S,r.:t.:t hrn I The (II) Cou1.c1I Pfth c C H\ ofh1glc"01,.1tl, Color.hill he reby :u11 tH,n1e-. thr.::
:icccp1:inct o f the C n lo r:-i J o \Vatc:r Con~c:r. nu on Oon 1d Pl unn111 ~ G ra nt. uttm:hc~l hereto as l:.xh 1h1 t . \
lt H!tHl m:ed. re,ul 111 lu!I. ,md pa-.sed 0 11 lirs t n:ad1 11);! on th 1: 4th JJ y ofS1:1>1 e111hcr . 20 12.
Publi shed b~ T 11\c: as a Bill 11 111 Ord111:111l'c 111 the C il y's l'f!i \.'.1al nc\\sp :.i pt:r m 1 iii '-' 7th da) 0f _
Septc:mhc r. ~012
Pllhli ,;;llt'tl a~ :i Rill for :m O r<lin;i nt t· nn lht-' f'11 y's o ffi c·1:l l ,\'t'h ,1lf' bcgmn111g o n lh c 51h d:l y of •
Sei•tem ber, 20 12 fo r thirt )' (30) d:i y,.
ll ca cl by title anrl 1,asscd on 1111 a l read ing on th e 17th da y of Sep te mbe r. 2012 .
Pub li shed by ri1l c 111 th e Cay's offt c 1a\ ncw 1:;p:iper :1 s Ord1i:.1 11cc f',;o
the 21 St cf:l y o r St:ptcmh cr 20 12
, Sen cs of :rn 12. nn
Pub li s hed by 11 tl c on 1hc C 11 y's fl ffi c1,1I website brg1nning on 1hc I '>th tiny fl f
SqHt:lllht:1, 2012 fl'I" thi rt) (JO ) J ,t y:,,
R:t nd y P Penn, Mi'lynr
ArrEs r :
Lnucrish i,1 A . Elli s, l it ~ C lerk
I. I 11 r n sh1 :l 4\ FIii ,, f'll )1 c ·trrk o f 1h e ri 1y n f L:n3lrwood , f'o lori'ld r\ hcrt·by ct'111ry 1hm th t'
.i hov c an d fo rego ing 1:. ;i 1mc ('O f))' o f till' Ord 111:111cc p assed on Ji nn I 1cad111 g :u1d publis hed by
111k as O nima ncc No , Sc 11 cs of 20 1 ::!.
Lo ucn slua A Elli s
•
•
•
•
•
( J F
rvh f\e:n 1Nc1tlt.:
Vo/,7 1t..• C on~cr...,rii n o ;111£1 G 1,int!) Cnott hri ,,tu
C:olnr;:1d,, V\':::itr.r Conscr v r11 if'n B or11d
E N I ,
O ll lt'r• ul VV;1tc1 Con scrw11,on ilnrl Drou9t 11 Pl;mnu ,g
1:1 1.1 S hr>n11 :-.n S trc .. ,__.t , Roon 1 /2 1
De nver . C B020J
I· \IV ( J () IJ
l~F. C:i l y o f Fn111ewo:H.f \\Inter Con~e rvc111on P l.=mrnng lirc-11,t Apphc ;,1ron
111c C11 y o r Lng le·...,ood 1s 11 11e,cs1ec n deve l'.:'l prng a \1\/a ter Cons ,vd llon Plun to guide tr1e
t•l fPc!:v P anrl ,r--._ronsihle uc::P o f their \vn te r resourcr.:c The C tly Counc il und ers ta nds 1l 1i.Jt , 11 1
r1 cr.ord,111r.e \'/rth H00'1-1 3CT5 t1rw i ng rl Str1 l e -approvccl Wa ter Co n servntion Plan is prcrcriu,slle
I<: o /Jk111 1111~ f11 1a 11 ~1r11 ;-iss :$l r1 n ce rrom tt1e Colorado Wn lcr Co nsc rvauo n Bo:ird (CWC8) cind lhe
C::-i l0r,:,c Jo VVL1l e r Re sources and P ower De velopment A11thority
On beh.:iH o f th e C i ty , \V e cu e subr111 1t 1na !he att.:u .. llt:tl p lanni ng grant appl1 cn 11 011 tor a Water
C,,n se,viltron f'lil11 Tl1e total c o s t to complele !he plan is $G8.U0 0 The C11y propnsP• t:> rn ,1l ch
S20 0JO wrl h rn-krn d se rvices , which Is 30% of Ille l o lnl project T he C ity requests a gr.in t for
s,18 .000 from CVVC8 10 com pie l e the plan , whic h w il l cover r, I en-year planntny ta u 11t.un 'ro!ll
70 12 !O 20 ✓1
/\r:, ~•011 will 5P.C 1n !he i ttt ;i ch ed revt $Cd p/Jnn1ng g 1 ~!Ill npnh r.n 1,nn. 11-.e C 11y 1s commil!t:d ·o
111 plem en1in9 P.ff ecl!ve lo no-1c 11r1 water savi 11us .ind efl1 c1e 11 c y m e as u res a nd programs Tile
l.1t y ·.·:1 silQS to do 1\!; r·nr t in sa vin g wJ lc 1 for Ille re 9,on arici I VV d t~1 Conserv.11 1o n Pl an \·:1t l go ·,
h :ig ,,,,., y u1 help1119 to m rcc l l h1s tornrrn lr ne n t
Please let !l'lP l,n nw rf you h.:1 \P. .iny 1111 Pc;hons o r neQ ~l ci<!cht 1on~11 rn fo 1m.:-i 11on.
'' I ,.>"//,(r.,.el,
SH~\\J I r o n t!il , Drccto ,
CnrJIC \'.'OO rl U! lt{Je~
.It I, 1 1,I •••,,., ,/ I ,,j •t ,,ii,. I I /ti ! ' ".,., 1\1 \ 0 / •
,., .• 1•-,11,,,,, ... i:,•• .. •··
/\. The nnrne a nrl cnnl ac l 1n lorrna 11o n ol Ihe ent II1· ~at:king ll1e gran l.
CO NTAC T :
Va sse r /\boua ;s h
Utilities F 11 ginoer
C il y of E nglewood
1000 E 1,y tewood Pa I kway
[nglewood, CO 00 1 10
303-7n?-:?R 52
0 lncl iv ,ounls lrorn the C 1Iy o l Ena lcwoor1 v1ho w,II IJc in vo lve d 111 th e p 1ojcct in c lud e:
Vasser l\l>oua i::.h is R professional engineer regi s te red 1n seve rr1 I sla te s and h:i ::; twenty~
live years u l t:x p erie n c c in wa ter resources p la nnin g a nd manJgom enl. His I cte wil l
inc lud e reviewing cl em antl proj P.r.tions , es lab li sh ing wa ter sa vi 11 ys goa ls, bra in storr1 ing
water con se rv;ition m easures a nd G:ree n ing i h 1uugh lhe fin al hs l. He wi ll se rve as 1'10
p rojecl m nnugcr and primary c ontact lor complet ion o l th e Waler Con se rva tion P 'on .
To m l:lrn,··,a n is n p ro fe ssional engine er ragis l ered in the SIa Ie of Co loraoo. He has
ove r !won { yl"nrs o f oxporienco 1n wa ter righ ts and v,ater pla nn ing arena. To m w,11
serve as 11·10 U c hn ico l advisor fo r co mple ll on of Ille Water Cons,irva lion Plan. He w,11
nss ist w il h 1h e id e nt ifi ca ti on a nd quan ti fica tion n l con serva l io n m easur es, iJSsoc ial e:1
wA le r savings , 8n d overall plan rf evebpmenl.
Joh n Doc /, iG the Ut ilil ies D~µarlment's Ma nage r ol Admin islr,ifion . He ove rsees lhe
opera tion o f th o C IS Infinit y c ustom er info rma lion and billing sys t,;11 1 and 1r.o
Depa rtm c111's G IS system 8nd wil l coo rdin aIe l ec hni ca l assls:ance for lh is projec t.
/\m y Churc l1 is on e of lh e Ulililies De partment's two ,.ys tem s11 ppor1 spec ialis ts. She
possesses ex p en ise in th e ope ra tions ol lh e CI S lnfini l y B illing Sys tem . She will sup pon
lhe projec l 1n th e extrac lion of n ece ssa ry in fo nnation lrom the IJill in g sy stem .
Pau l R od ec k is th o U 1iliti es Depa rlm en l's G IS Analyst . He will fu rn ish 11,0 projoc l wilh
:nforrna l ion ii m ay n eed from 11 ,e G IS sys tem Cathy Burrage is lhe Oep ,mm en rs
Exec utive Ass,stanl. S h e will sur,rnrt lhe cleri ca l needs of lhe proj~c t.
S 1Pw,,rt Fo nda is n proCas siona! c 11 yinee r reg1s 1e rcd in the Sta le o f C:o lorado and hns
ov e r 1/u rty yea rs of t:X pe li e nca in wa !er resources plannin g and ma n::i goment. S tewart is
lhe U lililies Direc 1or /o r the Ci ly ol Eng lewood . He wi ll advise anLI prov ide 9cncral
direc l ion on 11 11 nspecl s n f lho p rojec t. Ha v-.i/1 a lso be pHra .nou 11I m 1110 develor,men l ol
cn nse rvn lio n m easures ll1a 1 Ille Cily Cou ncil will u llimately od opl ,ind in,ple111en 1. I tis
role w il l include fin al rcvi-,w u/ pl an , and p resenta ti on to lhe C11y Coun c il.
I lie C ily o l EQ,q lewood wi ll lakP. the lead in lhe plan deve lo11men1. Mr. Ya~ser Aboua ,sh
Ullh Jies Fnqin Ae r will be recpc nsibl e f:i r thi s project. In add1lion the City wil l utili ze th o
~ces o f s12:ec ia li zed ou ts1du expo rt (Clear Water Solutions In c.) to provide 1echn 1c.:;i
c1ss is1a 1 ice dnd par1i c ipa1e .!!Lth.s va'ious tFtsks of the plan -P icas~ re fer 10 the n 11 nchmen1.
•
•
•
•
•
•
The CWCO g ran t wj ll cover Consullanrs le~ and to pa 11ially ol lse1 ll1 ELQJY.'s staff cosl.
Finall y, lh e Waf er a nd Sewer □oard and Engle wo od Cily Co 11 nc1I will be involved in lh t:
p, oje<:I, IJy providing discussion !arums, pol icy guidance nnd public parlicipalion
rla lforms 1hroug ho 1J l lh r> Pla n developmcnl "nd app ,uval s 1ages.
C Eng lew ood rn tHil wa ler del ive ry fo r cacti o f !he pa s1 ten years
Ta b le 1 -Annl1al Water De l ivered (Overa ll Product ion) & Associated Rainfnll
---------------.--
YE/Ir! Annual Wate r De liv er y
(M illi on G.i ll ons } nainfo ll (I n c h es)
---------------
201 1 1.n,~ 2 17 13.-10 ------------
2010 2 ,0 ,t D.806 o.ao ---------------------
200n 1.051.714 ?4 70
2008 2,224 .46 1 11 15
I
2007 2,070.9 13 16 .33
2006 2,509.75B 11 .03 --200 !:i 2,559.701 13.54
' I-----------· 2004 2.273. 170 10 47 -----------, ------20 03 2 ,647.287 12 .14 -------1------·--2002 ?,f!?O 646 "06 I __
raule 1 s l10ws stea dy decl111 e in ·)ve rall waler consu rnp l io ns (see n o1es helow)
• An nual average ol approx . 2,000 M G for lhe past 5 yea I s
An n1Jal av,m,go of ap~rc.x . 2,600 MG for ll1 u p revious 5 ye a rs
N OTES:
o In 18 07 Ille E n g lew ood Ci!)' Co w ,c,I passe d an o rdina nco re ~11 in ng th e instal lalion ol
wn1 c , mere rs (and swilcl11 n g 10 consu mption-ba sed rn te) a l p rop erti es receiving fl at , i11 e upo n tr a n sfe r o l o wne rsh ip
0 An rtve ragc o f 220 m o rcrn has been iils lall ed a nnually for tho post 2!'1 yt:tu rs , rin d
u /\n ussoc i a te d 30% ro du c 1i o n in wat e r u se h as t ake n p in ce .
Annual Wa !er Del ivered
,\nnu al Wate r De liv:ry
Yra r (Miliiois of Gall ons)
2001 1,520.646
700 .l 1,647.287
1CO, 7,27 11 70
2005 1,559.70 1
)006 2,589.7 5!,
}0,)7 2,070 .913
)008 2,m.46 1
'009 1,85 1.714
iOJ O 2,0408 86
7011 1,663.2 17
Annual Water Delivery (M illions of Gallo ns )
J,5 00000 -----------
J.000.0)J · --· .. --.. --•.
1,100.oro
1 1,00000J
1,500 00)
1,000.00C
soo (00 I -·-. --------
i ·--, ·-1-r -, -r ·--,· ---· ·,-·· r -,
1001 no: 100H00510 0i1 007100SIOll9 iO!UlO I!
-An nu,I \\'111 1 [~l·my(t!lli:o;
o/GJrom )
•
•
• D . Englew,1odpopula1io11 has beP.n s !able (approx. 3 1,000 ··) tor !he pasI 10 years
•
•
I 090 Po pulotlon 29,018
2000 P o pula tio n 31,72 7
201 o P opul a tio n 3 0 ,525
20 t I Popu lation (es1ima t e wil l ba ava il a b le In June 2012)
•• Source: U.S. C on s u r. Bureau : St oic nnd Cm,nt y O .. ic kr-oc t c. On t o ded vc<1 t ,o m Popululion
E slin~:i tc~. Amll , Jc un Communily Swvc y, Co n :>u ::1 of P or,u lt1t io ,, ond Hou:i/n g.
E. Englewnnrl v1a tcr sys te,n c'1 arac Ie1is lics nncl pertin en t growIh iss ues are a s lo llows:
Co lornclo D epa rtm en t ol Pub li c Henl!h a nd Environrnenl's Wa !ar O ua/11y Co 11 1roI
D iv ision c:ondLJr.ted ils Sour ce Wate r Assess m en t o f En g lewood Waler Sys!orn in
2004 , w l ,i c h rendered t11e lnllrnvi 11 g res ul!s; !h e wa I1,r s11 p ply consisl~ o::
3 a ctive su rta ce wa ler sources
O c1 clivt! grou nd wa ter so urces under the influen ce of surfaco wa ter
O aclivo, p11rr.lrnsod surl .:icc wa ter buurcos anrJ/or purc t1ased gro und
waler sources un cler /he in lluence of surface wale r
Based on I/]!? CJ!!Ls bi/li no syslem , ave rage wa ti;r use fo r !ho las! 5 yea rs is.
co TOTAL: 17 4 Ga llo ns Per Ca p il a Per Day (G PCPO) syst em -wi d e
o RES I DENTAIL: 104 GPC PO for sin g le fa mily h om es (Only)
The s yslem-wide (Io ta!) per capi:a wa te r u se fo r th e pas ! five ye ars is !isl ed below:
r
Ye;,r GPCPD
2007 186
2 0 08 199
2009 IG6
20 10 183
20 11 167
Es ti111n1er l ;;nnu,,I wa tor saving lo b~ ach,evcd I/trough irn ptern un 1a 11on ol !hc plan ,s
12 5%, wh 1c l1 eci u nls approxm,a !ely 250 Mr. (767 a c re fee t)
Ti re U S r:0 11 sus Ou roac1 p reuic ls f'11y lewooc1's p opula!ion 10 rernaI~ !h o sn mc lo r !he nexI live (5) yea s.
Enolr wo:id wa l e r s ystent s'alJilily ilnd re!iab ili!y a ,e adeq11a Ie ba sed on IIs loca 11on
an cl eva1 lallihty o f 111ulliple sowces (r.n•11pared 10 meas o f <:u n en I and fu t ure wa ler
,mods n s •cle niiliccf by !he S!a lew icle Wnl er Supply lni:ialivo (SWS !) .
T he C ity of Englewood Vfotc r C o n servat i o n Pla n Sco r e o f Work :
This scope of wo ll< rtP.s cril ... n s 1h o work to b o perfo 11n e r.J Uy ,!13: Crry o f EnQ!ewo od . Tho score
oi ,rltn os the ta sl<s rcqu•r crl l o ou ccessfully 1.:o rnp le te a wate r conservoti n fl/Fi n in ncco1d.1nce
,•v ith C WCIJ '~ Wn!rn Co11 s1..•rv<1 1ir n Plan guidelines an d polir.if"s
Wa l e r co nse rv a ti o n r>IA n s Hrf" 1equire<J under l he Wc.11 c, Conse rvation /\c l o l 200'1 fo r covP.red
r.n l i li c-s !hat seek financial n oo r3t Ance lrorn ""' CWCU o r ll1 c Colo rado Wa tP.r n esourcoc. an d
P w or D e vc lop rn on r /\ullru ri l y . T l1e ObJe cllvo o l l llr s task is In rleve:op a plan l har mee ts th o
CWCO req rr lrorn e nts , rnak cs b en eficial and 0 esponsi b le 11 se of tho Ci ty's Wdl er supr lies, ancJ
1111 ,rrn :cty r.nnbles 1110 C it y In nppl y f or sInI 0 l rnon c in l assls ta11,;« fu r s11bsequent projec ts.
1 h e Wa te r Conserva tion P l,·J11 wrll b e tlcvclo pod lollo w1ng CWC:H'~ Wa ter Conccrvo rio n P 'd11
D cvulupmcm l Ou1ri nnce Document . f"lubli c-wvi ow corn men ts w,U bo in corpo1a1eL1 prior 10
~u bn11 ll rnq th e p lan 10 t he C ity C:0 1,ncil lor fina l approva l ancl ,1 d up Iiu11.
Tlrn informa11011 chm,ic 10 11 111 1u p as r waler use l1y soctor (re sidenli AI, cornmorci;,I indust,.,al, r,l c.l
,1!J.£Lner cnpitll l 1se (res1cl e n 11a I anQjotnl) is pol r □,1<1ily nvailobl o duo to ltrn Clli!.fW I WiWtlQ!l!!n.g
&.stem's rcpo rtir!9...ill!J.!.l.SllillJ:lli..{::;inr.e 2004). E n qlcwood Uti ,itics I 1<1s rnr.enlly contract ocl wi!h l hn
l~llli0.9 .. fil(S l nm sol tw;ire clrwe lopcr i n o rder to be able 10 g en erarc l he_necclQcl rc12n rt s dming..!h!l
£.Q.!mill _ol dcvclop,ng i ts con se,va tion p Ia11I ,l une 201 2 IQ..,filQU An• ?n..1,;1L
T 110 davolopm en r o f t/J e pla n is rlivrrl e d inr o the following rasks (s 111il ar l o w ha t rs rndica ted in rh c, c wc n Model Pl .1 n T e mp late):
Tasl, 1. Pro flle th e E xi s tin g W at er Syst em
l Ile ,,cl rvilies d escribecf rr ncle r t his task will provide inf c,11 11 at1o n on the C ity's cxistrng w at e r supp ly sys tem .
t. 1 Protrle p l1ys1c al c h □ra c t e nstics of the ex ist ing w~te , s upply sys:ern :
W ill describe the physica l characte ristics ol the wate r sys t em . Included In th e
srrrnrnary wi ll bo key sys tem characteristics, googrnphlc .:1r ea SANod, populatio n
n nd co nnectio1:s bcrvcd , types o f key \\aler users, Fi >o stin g f.-tci l 1tic s n nd dcrrand.
1.2 l dcnlil1• o ll wa l Ar sources:
lr1 P.nlity rind describe all of lho sysh.:m's \-,·a te, supp iy s our es inclt ,:lin g
.:l!t ributcs, age, s e 111u 1ily and cond1 lmns o f tf s u:.;o . F:s linio tcs will be m m.le fu 1
,111y l illSSI TlQ 1n1011na!1o n .
I 3 Id •n 11ly s ys tem limilrt ll onn :
Descr ibe tho C ity'!; wah,::r sytilem l11n11a11 o n :;
1.•1 C r1a ra cteri1.c w a te r ens,~ and pricing c lruct u rcs.
Oo ctJ rne111 rr-t s l cmd c u rr e nt his to ry of Wd l Cr sales .
1 5 llcv,cw c w re nt p o lrc,es c=i nd planning mil1Alives:
rnsc u ss nlQ j or p o lic ies lhe C it y has III pl nco lh nt aff c:t wr1r c-u u se Imder n or 11 w l
.1nrl cfr o11g ht <YH1rlitions, and !;Un1mflr ize 111a j ur plnnn1ng ello rt s to dmc .
t G Sumnmtize c un c 11t wdltH CO Pserva l ,c,n ac11 vitics:
1:::;1,mnte wa1w ::;avings from p1ov iously unp /cmcntcd Clmccr vnl10 n mea~t ll Ct;
•
•
•
•
•
•
T;,sk 2. Cha, ilclerize Water Us e and Demand Forec;is t
The ;:,c ti vil,r,s rlr,s cnbec unde r th is tns t, v111/ prov,ue inf ormcJt,o n 011 11 10 Ci ty's exis 1ing ancl pro jected wc1 1er uso.
2 . I Cha r3c lcri1.c Ct rrent wa l t1 r w,e:
ncv,ew b illing r cords :o s~mrnnn,c current water l!S~. lnc h,dt:d will be de1a1led
c us lom P.r sector d:i:r1 quantif icn ti ons of in door vs. o utd oor use ,1nrl pol Able~
non-pol nb le use, find exi1 111 1r1a1 ,on ol l1is tori ca l water 11s0 by tap siz
?.2 Se lect fo recasting method :
/\ Llcrnanrl fo rec;,stmg me th ocl will be selec1er1 nnd desc nb.:,d .
2.3 Prcp;,re dema nd forecas t:
Est1rn fl tc futu re wa ter de mand by lr1p siz o o r cw::;tomcr cntcaory acco ,cfing 10 !he
!:Clec tod forecn cting m et hod.
fa ~I, 3. Profile f>rop oseLI Facflltl cs
Tho actrvit ios desc rib ocl unde r rhi8 :r1slc w,11 id e nti fy urlll desc lib l, pl i:i 1111 ed irnp roven1cn ts
basccf 011 Ille res ults fro111 ste p tw o a;icl cs!i rn;,te the associated r.ns ts
~ t Fstimate supply cos ts based on the demand forecast:
Prepare inc remen tal a ncl total costs for wa tnr ~11p p lies tha t nrc app rop,iu lc:.
J.2 Id en tif y cm cl <.J cscribe anticipa ted capita l facilit y in1provomo11 1s and ndd,ti ons·
SurnmMize fa c il ity n ee ds ove r n simi lar l imo ho rizon used for den,a11d
forccas1,ng .
3.3 Cstima te lotn l, Annual and unit co~I of 1he impru vt1 rn ents :
Develo p cost cs trma tes of improvem<J nl5. W ork sheet wi ll bo use d as o g ui de .
3 4 Develop a wo tcr w pply capacity lo1ecas 1:
Provide a su mrn anzect supp ly cnpAc ity forecast.
Task 4. ldc1,tily Con sg rvntion Goil l s
n ,c nc tiv,tic s d esc riberl under th is task wr it rc lent ,ly conscrvat ron goals. 'nr th o C111•
,1, 1 Develop w a le r r.nn--.e,va t,on na nl!;:
Deve lop wa l~r co nse r ,atio n goal s 1n co llab ora tion wnh 1h A Cit y Counc il. /\roa s
fu • wa te r co nsorvo uon wi ll be identifi ed basccJ on result s from T asks 2 nnrl :i. /\
srcr-i l ic wa ter-savings tnrgrl , as 'Ne ll .,s liow the snvmgs will be measurecf, w r'I _ be k fPnlilr ctf
4.2 Document th e gofl ls d evelop en t process :
Doc umen r 1he process use d ro 1iev lop lh e wo.tor co n scn,r1t10 11 yui:ils .
Tn sk 5. l rlr~n tify W ~t er C onsc rvAtion Me,"l curc~ ond Proc11 um s
rhc nc11 v1 11es cfcscnhcd 11ndc r lhis tc1sk vvill iden ti fy co nservation n1eu:::;111 Pc. and
prnr,rHrn::; tl1 u Ci ry m~y • nph~rncnr !O reRc h Ille conscrva 1ion !=JORIS 1cfcn 1rt ied in T;1s~ '1 .
6
. ~ 1 ldP.nll l y r.o r.servt1 tio n m ens u rco nnd progrn:n ::i.
Dcvc lo r w iJ fCr c onse rvalic 1 111 uasu rcs.
5 .2 D e v elop nnd define scrr pn ing crit er a :
Descrrbe !h o screening ri1orio us ed 10 cv:1 l1Jct l u ti nd e l 1m 1n a113 scmc o f the Vi.alc r
con5crw,ti on m easures t1 11<J p,ogrnms ,
!, . .J Sc ree n con!jc rva lio n mw1~11 m s anct p1L ora m c
I he sc reenin g c ri!om1 will bo appli e d lo 11-q 'univl;:;'1~u I~ 11s 1 of conservrlt 1o n
rieasu res anci programs l o de te rmine w n,1~ll ones will be fu rl h er ev1 l 11r1 l N f in the
ri lannm g process.
:rusk G Cva l 11 ct l e r-mtJ Se l ect Con sc r v n?1C'111 ;,!,J i:1S!,J rcs tl!1d r>r ogran~
l l1e .1c 1,v111 os escnb ed under th is tas k n, c 1n l r.11 clerl l o eva lua t e a nd Gc l cc 1 tho op111nal
c:>n zctvri ll~n m easures .-1nrl p rograms t1 1e City rnoy mp lern cn:.
(i .1 Ct !:!rl1e cu111 l ,i1tH lion s of meas ur es and nroern ms:
n ov1cw a ll conse r va ti o n measures ancJ r rn Jn nls 111Ht pa ssot! 1h r. scre ening
crit ~n n r1 11rl uro11 p t hem, so sim ilar m c.:i .G ures ,1n d assoc ;IL ) w •: .... ·-sav ings are
11 ,J t cl oub ln cou nted .
G 2 E st ima e cast s and wate r SHv 1ngs of co1scrva tion cp, uns :
r-c;t 1mrne l he cost o f each con::;c rva 1ion meas J1 e/µ1o yrnm and th e ns soc ia ted
w e1:'H savin9 s using Wor~sl1oe 1 6-1 a s a guidu. I\ cosl/benoli l nn;il yc:.is will also
IJe in cl ucJcd.
G 3 Com pare be n efi ts a nd costs:
S ummarize const:Hvct 110 11 measure cos1s a nrf wa ter savin g s, inc l11rt na a net
be n efit l rom a ll s 1Jgg es tc cl measure s .
G.,1 Define ova lun tio n crite ri a :
Develo p er ite:r i<-1 u sed 10 s el ec t 11,c conservation mert sure s/proo r ams for
irn()fcm enta11 on . J<oy crit e ria will be cost frir implemer tntion ;.lllcf p o tcn lifll wa1~:1
suvi.1os.
G !i Se lect cu11~e rv r1ti on measu res ,i nd p rog ra ms:
S11n ~mo:i1e Ili c c 11aluatio n o f oncl1 m Bc1.s 11r P,p 1ogra 111 hc1~cd o n the eve, u .:iIi u11
c ri'crirt anri m lir:r1tri. wH ll Counc il input, whic h rn e asui ~!:,/p 1ograms will Lie
11np lomcntc '. Tho wa te r s avi ng s (1 0 111 tile imple men tati on will be es tirn aterl
lfl s k 7 l n t cq r utc Rcso1irccs n n d J\1odify Forccn 3t s
The n ctiv11 i es dcccrib od u nder lh 1s !ask will mod fy l hc supply ar id demnn::f fo rc :rl s tc: 10
n cc o unr for wa 101 sr1v i11 JS fr om th e se lec ted conscl'\la tion m ~2s1 1rP. ;ind p ro9ri:u n. Th e
bene ltl s u l consc rvn rion as well ns rewmuP. e ff ects will also uc <.1ddrcssed .
7 . 1 ncvi:::.c d c rnflnd foreca~I.
ne-v1:,~: ti •~ Uemctnd rorecast prcpcued rn r ~si< 2 to accOL Jn l for the wate r snv1n g s
o f the mcn su rHs.'progmm s fro m Tn sk n
•
•
•
•
•
•
7.2 lden tily p1ojer.I-spec 1fi c savings:
Determine the effec/ of wa ter savings '.:om conserw,I,nn on the Inning ano
,;,1paci 1y of lac,I11y ,mprovemen t proj ects and qua lily savings .
7.3 Revise supp ly-specif ic savings :
De 1erm1nc ril e eflec / ~r water saving s from conse,va t•o n on th e ,,,n,ng nnd
ri'l fJJ C1l y ol rc,cility improvemen 1 p 1u1uct a nd quant ity savings .
7A neviso cupp/y-c apa cil y fu1o cc1s 1.
nev,se 11,e supply c11 pac11y forecast basP.rl on fin dinge fro m Tas, 7.2
7.5 Sumrn:1rizo fo rec 2s t rn udifi cationG and bene fit s of co nsP.rvn ti on;
Deve lop ;, grap h s howing cfemanci ,111rl supply with and w,,noul cu11serva11on
7. G Consider reve nue ef fects:
Q uan ti fy im pacts to revnnr 1es fr om ir·1plem cn 10 1io n of wa ler co nse rvation .
S,ivings in capilal improvemen t projects or delayed w al e r acquisition w ill bo
presented ll!Jai11s 1 loss in sa les revenue. Strat egies to address thi s issue will be dis cu ssed .
Tas k 8. Deve lon Imp lem e ntation Pla n
The ac t,vi lic s described under this la5f wi ll prese nt a s lraleoy lor Implem en1i ng th o
se lt,clcLI conserva t,on measure s and describe met hods for moni/oring ll1e plan's c;uccess
u . I Develop im plem en tat ion sched ule:
Di sc uss sig nificant implem enta tion acti ons a nd obs ta cles for implemen1i n9 /he
selec ted conse r,a lion 111 e3s ures. Will develop a re.:iG o nab /e im ple m ,•n lation
sc Iicdule and lime table le follow .
0 .2 Develop plan for pub lic pa n ir.ipa lion in irnp le111en1u 1ic,n .
Describe how to involve th e publi c in the im plementat ion process
0.3 D vebp plan for mnnil oring and ev.:i lu mr on prog,e~s.
Dulcrmine a nd cJ escribe how tile Wa ter Conservntion P lan will h e rn cris urccJ lo, c ff cctrv0n i::s~.
(l.4 De"e lop rAan fo r upda tin g and ,evisin g th e plan:
D csc11t,e wlien II inl enrls l o upda te :nc W o!Cr Conse rv a l ron P/1111.
0 .5 Del ine plan adopti on d ale/p lan co111p le!ed rl ate/p lan approved da le:
/\ co py al the approva l resolution adop•ing t/JP. f,n,1/ Wa ter Cons erva11o n P lan w,II
be inr.l11 rle,1. Wif l nf so dovo lop a sche:llu/c /or City Gounc,I adoption & adoptio n.
Task 9 -Monitor, Eva lu ate and n cvise Con servation Act iviti es and the Plan .
The p lan w,11 be implcnicnrod and monit o red baserl on 1t1 e sc h eCu lo rt c vc lop ·d from
T,,sl, 8. W1 'I a lso corn m ,1 l o moni tor the pe rforriance o r li 'e p/1111 mc/ucf inq updal inn the pl;:i n ns req ,mp. I
<
AA 000000393 (24) ' ~ 1 '
Task 10. PulJlic Outreach and Participat i on
·1 l1Q dra ll conse rval,on p lan w ill be availa b le ior rovicw and publi c comment lo r 60 days.
Durino 1h H rublic co mment period two inf orma tional presef'l!a t1ons will be m ade; di th e
Wa ter & Sewer Boord m ee ting a11d c11 the City Counci l meel in9 . The p11h li c is welcome to
1'tt ond the,~e 111eet i11gs and commen t o n 111e plan : in additio1. wn ll en rnpul nnd
StJ!:)ge s t,o n s wi ll br. encouraged.
')
•
•
•
•
•
•
Projec t Sc hed u le
T ahle 2 -Prop osed Sc h ed ule
Dclivcrnhl e
G ran t App li ca tion submit ted to CWCl3
CWCO a proves gran l ancl r.o . iss uecl
M cc1i nq wi lt1 Consultanl In r.norrl 1na te l<ts k deli ve ry
S ub mit 50 % progress report to CWCO
Submi t 75% progress report to CWCD
Su b mit fin.-=1 1 d r~fl l o 1N a lcr & Gewer □o~uu 1:11 1cJ
Ci ty Co uncil fo r revi ew
Co ll ec t W1i ter & Sewer Boa ru and C ity Co un c il
Comm en ts
'"util y pJblrc of dra ft plan 111 o flr cial newspaper
r ublic rev iew period (60 da ys)
Co u ncil fo rmally ad opts fin al cl ralt
Subm it final pla n to CWCB
CW CB approvP.s pl an (GO days )
Oa te
07/9/2 012
0/03/20 12
00/06/20 12
09/30120 12
1or•i120 12
11 /30/2012
12/ I S/20 12
'12/3 0/2012
02/30/2 013
03/15/20 13
03/20/2013
0'.i/30/2 0 13
PROJE CT CO ST
IT FMIZl:D
WORK SCOl'C
T11 :1 1( l . r ,ofil c E 1d s ll11!'J W uter
S ys te m
To sic 2. Ch arn ~l crhc Use an d
Oe m u nd i·o,c ::"~'
Ta!:.k J Prolile Prn11n-.cd rnc Uitic11
Tab le 3 -P.urla et
---C'lNS ULTAN T
10
l\dd 1tionill
CITY ST/\Fr
10 $1,000
GR/\N T
llEQU FS
T
SJ ,:1 <1n
CITY STArf.
(In l<i ncl )
/Ir~. Cos t
I C :;1 01.)()
s 1.n r;o ------1-
'5 "SOD I s,.s so ! 15 i,1 50 0
•
1 0fJ\L
CO ST
l il ,J•lO
$'1 ,050
$1-,G-,-0-1---IC-, $1 500 I-~:, ... I 20 $2000 )C.,110
----+------~----i----------I -
Tas k 4 . hlnnld yCon ,;crval i o n G ool !.I l b $1,0 50 15 °'1"11 1 SJ <1 50 I 20 !.2 003 ~5 .J50 , ____________ _j ________ _
ra~k 5 . IOPntlfy C o n!';cr v ;i 1l o 11
fl r oott.tm s 10 $2 •160 10
---, c-------f-----------J
$1,000 SJ,460
TIT :.k n. Ev alu. & S e lOCI
Con 11 e r vullo11 M e n .!lu rc!.
--·----·--+------1-----1------
5 0 $7,1 10 J O $3,)00 s,0.110 30 SJ:.ooo 1 13 ,1 JU
Tn s k 7. lnicor ate Resource s $1 20 0 co !2.000 $3,200 15 $1,:IOC. M ,700
Taiih 0 . Ocvel op l rnpl cmenuum n
Pl.In s 5 1,l ;IQ 1r; rn.soo 57 ,6 40 15
---1 •
Tn s k 9. Monito r. f:vol uolo and
ncvlsc the Plan
Travel t:.rpcn:;e!> -7 rncc lin!J ~ x
.$0.!i!:ili n l A 13 0ml
CG
sno ,, t 1,c oo
-----
$4,86 0 ,o S2,0'JO --+-
I
'1.~00 19, J,10
$1 ,21 0 1; S l ,500 52,770
$6,860 <O Sli ,Oi'IO $10,8 $0
S506 SSOG
Phone C onre,c n c e wl 1t1 r.wc e a ll 1u MIO ---~-~----::-fina l review & lnco,pornlc c onim onls
------____ /
TO TA I.COffl I 102 $2;,3 16 2 10 S2 1 000 i S,fi ,3 1.B W O S20,000 I '66,3 16 i I ______ , _L_
• • • Cn n~ul I Ci ni r i=t.: is cu/c ulotcd as an ave r ag e o f $ ! 5 :J hour/v r ot e (Se e A 11achrre n1}
•
•
•
•
No r1:s
The a bove Pr o Jeer Gudge t 1s based on n 101n t-d fort npp n,och .!V •th C11v of F nry 1ewc0d stof f lcod1nc one
fully pn r1 1c1po t 1nn 1n nl ! tn sks in order to bui ld 1n-ho :.i se expcrti!e 1 ho t w,11 regu:or l) review e nd ur,d'l rc 11.
Ci t y S toff Cost 1S co!c ulo t ed n s on overnge. of ~,JCIU per hour (1n cl11d 1n9 snlcwy, 0 11 benc{,;.:; ov erh..:.oU 011d
rndtrec r cos ,.<: le) based on:
Ut,lt!ies D irl!l.l o r·
U1 d r1 1es Enaineer·s
Adm :n1s •rnt 1on Ma nager
5 }1 S . S u ppo rt Sp~ua b:;ts
n,;lur1cr, ropo 11 r repruntmri , n e ncml p ro ject cos!. mec11ngs. etc .
f,110
$h5
f..f'TA Clfl"-"[UT ~
P,rJ•rt r11• r..umnl•
C ity ot r n11l1wo crl W111••• Co •••••"'~1 ,nn r ,an
lASK A• Dovelup Vliotot Co11sa1 .. a1Jun Pla n
S111r 1 P ,ofilo of l:',1.,1 .. u wu., S yll lcm
1 1 1 ~110 c .. :i, ,,p \\',1•e r fi1u .. ,,,
I 2 lcto nl ll'f S ('UI Cel of w,11 er
J<:o nuly ~1:11em I h1w1111,o,,s
1 ~ Cl,nrlt(J U!II I'! l.'41111 (.;f'i,IS n n,I l"n cl no
1 , R~,4""' CL.mmt rol,ue:. .,nu Plenr, ri.g h 11 1111 .,e,
1 ft, ::;11M'tlM1U! c .. ,, ... t \V.1111 1 C':Of\u r,,n1 h,,, 4<,l h/11 ,e,
~-~-Ula'-/--------------SU1p :.! • Ct1,,ae 111r1u, w .1e1 U~• a1111 fo1c1:a1 1 rcma ml
, (,hntllCIC•llC C ulll't/'11 Waler u~c
:, :-$cle1:1 ro11:....,_1111g Memo tt
:' l p ,,.r,1>1e 01'11'1ll<\II [Of e U U I
""' Mcho.'1tt11c:ier
HOlf t,,. S Ufl
1120 TOTA L ,, , ., ..
l ?I O
11•0
,2~0
1 s,n
: s:1.1
l10LlllS -sJa
n•,O TOTA~
11111
.SI SO 11'Jl )l'lO
S l~0 1J!l0 u uo
S.1 50 1l90 Sl'ln
~un u o" 13!>0
~~_!-
::;~ !~~~ :;:~
U lkl_ -11...!.•!> -----1-'-'"-"·'.:.:'''-l
, 121 0
\U O
11•0
)1~0 1 1!lo n ~o
s o 1 1;,o 11 10
U GO S'IO !S-1 0
S111r,) t!,.cc•~~"'11~"i"ri"1:0e,,' ro= .. ,,-,cc,,~""'°'""'"-,--------------__ , _ _!_lOO_ -'--'-"""'"'"--•--''-"' """-' +---'~
J I lnen'"r ano C u ,i Pa Cll'•Al Ffldl I~ tie DUS
l 2 r•,rr,111 e un 1oc1 e ,.1en111 Coll ,.,,..o1~,••
1 ) 0c .. c1orP,o:h ,;,11,,y C•riocny nnj Casi, rm,cu 1,
$uJ,.Tol,o/
sicii'T.Tt1e 1111fyCn n..,,11rv1U,:,11 r.tJ al1e
• 1 Oc,e l.i p W ale.• Consr1v111Lon Goal,
I HU n oo 1 ~0
:~:~ :;~~ I :~e
~.,-~__.-'1,..•00~,~••x•c.c"'-'
1~6 0 s,oo s U60
1110 $150 IJOO
, .. 40
15 40
l !i -4 0
~
• 2 :>o.:ur.,e f\1 lhf' Gant [eV'f!l oromenl Prouin
Su).J OU/
.... r, I I h1ntlfv Cu0111••Y Mln11 M ltllJllfea •nd P 1au11m1
~•enllfy C()t1 Hum!lol 1M ro1u1r s 11oor1o01am,
----.~•~•.-,~·~·-'~"'~-"---'-'''-'"'=-•-~ -·-~
14 1\0 1500 1 1 o,o 1 1,0CO
c, 7 1.eva ll'I' 11ru1 Od,m, ~aeen1ng c, tene s,w SHi O :no 1 70
5 1 r:,.,,.rn C:>n~Ch'n\l:>n '"'e.1t»111a1 u na P 101J 11rn~
o:.,, .. ro1.t
\HO s ,so s1110 $1,110
Sle p G • I y;i, 11111n t111I !.oht :;I Coua111~•\lu11 MIIIIUll:I Ind P !O()flftl t
t ,!__ _!.!.:.!!!., -''--·1--'':::'00"-l_..=.,"'-'·':::''+--+-'"".:':::"c.J
n 1 r ,,.tur r.,-,,.,1,1,,1ulo'\t 01 Mco111e» and Progra m, • s•eo l'l50 HlO
n :' (i;:1m(lle r ,..,u l'l'IC v: .. 111, So.-..-.!J I c l Cur,~,:n,-1,on O p110111 2! S):MIO 1,.-.0 SJ ,510
6 3 Compal!~ 9en"'M'I 1""'1 Cot.a UI S l.!UO
0 • Cl!'!mc Ev1lu1U«1 r ,r ~rl u "'" S1S0 $'7CI
G 5 Se lect ConscrvMio 'l ._"911sui•• •"'2 P,ci g 0"1 11 11so 11n r 10'.10
~l).~•::c•'-----~----------l---''"-'---J---'"""''"'"'--'---"--
,,so n .on:i I
l-"17'-"'0"-+--'1"-'7·.:.:"c::.'+--a-"11~
moll
S:r,, 1. '"111nr11t a Rc su11,c11 111d Mo11lfy Fo!f'c ,.i,
1 , R!!vut: :>e ma ,11 =oiec:.i.1,
1 'l IOOflll)' P 1C11e u S 1t11Qftc S Mv ,N,1 •
I J nevi," Surpl 1 t,p.c.1, F0tec•u1~
1 110
"" "" St.'11
"' .... ..
1150
"'"
1,'2 70
li10
s1,o
$270
.St.700
I
o r..,e.uri 11•n le'Tle'l101i on ~ l1e du e t:-•O n u , S540 I
~, f111vclo p rlanl,,r Pu11l,.P1!1'1 lot1U1 ,on •1 ln,r,le1>11 11ut on s ·;,'l SO 1 1.-u
ti J Dcw.,l-lr P1 QO l:.r l.\on110,,,.g n ,u c ,.1,. .. 1,.,n r r0tuuu )110 \!'I J""t O : ; 6:-:~~r.:~;::~,~~•;:,:,,n:t;:~~~l•~~• i;.:;;.~;•~o~,;:~d 0~1~ ::!~ !~ : :~~
S1ep ~ r~~~;,:;;'.~ .. 1h1 ~u,.~1 Conurv11lun Ac~,.cs,,,,-,1,c-, -----l-~ .J~ __.:._ -· :."e:'<-' +--''°"1'-"""'-'-li
1'210
0 10
'2'0
l )l t
ll:'O
H40
1 12'
si n
--t!:T_!L
!, I llllr,ll"m.ent 11,e f"'lo•, 1 ','Q S l~O S:'70 S170
;~~~~!.~r~. ----------1
-,~ -s';,:~o -½---s\~-.,~::.ac;~~,,..._ ___ ,_,:;.~~o
ID"R"'ij":1-'IJ~llc~-.. -' I
~1ee\1!1 J Y>M~:.i OCll'lld nnCI Cur Council IOlJoi,,:,.~s p-.itonh,l 111e.111u1-::V1110~•11rn& S 1.; .. o I .'
0
Si 1;00 13 :?<10
~~;mc;;~Wr~~t',_11oc __ ,________ U /i::() ti s!:c -~-
!!m'll t . ., mrelu "J !I , 10 S5G.l n• • 1l0 ml : 1 ~0 6 s:oe ~'>e.2!'~1:;·~~~·~gt;~:~1~~·-----¼-r!t~-; ·· _S~O_,_!!.!~,_-~
1ouLi'u: -,1~.uo !o!.
,..,, . ...-in E,,g ewMl ~, .. 11 ...... 1 rm,r u~ ro fl()t1 ••.d C\-.';; "'1J ,o,,.ri•,1, ..i r,,ei ,11 .. 11 ~ r,, '"'''"""., ,; ,,, ........ , r.>i ltc <,,I •~ .. ~, 11,,>e:, lt nd 10 IIIIIC'IO ,.,,.,4 5 Bc11•0 ,l,V Co.ire.I m etll'\Ql 10 .n ...... , 'l ... , ... on»
\._._1, t o;..,.,g , 1:"' '" ,.,,c>n, ,., .. i,,,c ie,1 mca,u,c:, "1a p•~1am~ ,, re lo1• Je:1 1 1ocl1,on o! (..c;m,i,1 on~• h:o
$UO 1110 UOII '1.lU
e.e:.o 2•n10 ,~11 si~H•
•
•
•
NAME
City of Englewood
AGENDA ITEM-10~(a_,,) ==-
(P,.l!J,B.l!lmlifE~JRl)IJ;JR0.SffiER,
'•11,TE : September 17, 2012
ADDRESS
A Publ ic Hearin g to gather in put on the
proposed 2013 City of Englewood Budget .
PLEASE PRINT
NAME ADDRESS
• PROOF OF PUBLICATION
Ci ty o f Englewood, (.,v lo,~.do
Offi ci al W ebs1 e
www eng lewoodgov.org
I , Loucris hia A Elli s, City Cle rk, fa , 1he City of Eng lewood , do so le mnly swear
t ha t the att ached lega l notice (Notice of Public Hearin g on 2013 Proposed Budget -
Se ptember 17 . 2012) was published on th e Offi cia l City of Englewood Website fro m
• August 29 , 2012 th ro ugh September 17 , 20 12 .
I
State of Colorado
County of Arapahoe
ss
Subscr ibed and sworn to before m e o ·, ",is 17"' day of Septembe r. 2012 .
My Commission Exp ire s. November 8 , 20 16
SEAL KERRY BUSH
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY ID 19964018041
MY COMMISS ION EXPIRE S NOVEM BER 8, 2016
Phone (JOJt ~(1h-40ilQ
f:mJ II : \ 1_1_111,•_g,~)!fil1 l1•rmh1m• ,, , c1,,1m
Slate of Color ado
Co un1y of Amp;ihoc
AFFIDAVIT OF
PUBLICATION
'tins M lid a\'i l 111"1'u blica t1 011 for the ENliLEWOOD HER II I.D . a we.e.kl y
ru :ws pnpcr , print<..-d und pu blis hed for the Coun ty o f ~.r.it:ilwc, Su11e o f Co lorndo.
hereby ccr1i li cs llia t tht: :1u ad 1cd lcgH I notil.:c wns ruhli shc d in sai d 11cw sµo per on ce
111 each WL't:k , :Or J succcss 1\'C wcc k(s). tin! l11s 1 o f" hid1 puhlil:a ti cm wn s rn:1dc pr io r
to the 15t h <l uy of S(.:p lt.:mhcr A.D .. :?O 12 . ctrtd tli.it (op1cx of cad , number o f .s a id
pnpcr i n wh irh s.iid Puh lic Not ice \\'il S pub lished were de live red by Ci'lrriers or
lr:111s mi 11cd by mai l lo c,11,,h o f rl1t.: suhsc nhc:rs of sn id pnpr.:r , occ ordin).! to tb t:ir
~~~mee
For the Eng lewood Hcrnld
State of Colorado
County of Arapahoe )ss
The ubovc Affi du\'1t <md Certific ate: of J'ubl 1cat on wns :'\\1bscrihc:d .i11J swu rn tu
hcfo rc nw hy th e: nlm\'t-rrnmed GERARD H~AI.E Y. p11bli ~hcr nf snid ncwsp npe r.
who is pcrsorm ll y known to me to b~ lh t: idcnt icu l pcrwn in the nbo vi.: cc :-tificn tc on
thi s \Sih day ofScptcm hcr i\.D .. 2012 .
Nol t1T)' Pub lic , 9800 Pyrt:11nid Cou r1 , Suit e 100 .
Er.~lcwooc. c .. lorndo 801 12 •
• PROOF OF PUBLICATION
City of Englewoo d Colorad o
Offic ial Vveus ile
I L ouc rish ia A. Ellis . City Cle rk , for 1:he Ci ty of En glewood . do so lem n ly swea r
that the altacl1ed lega l no ti ce (Not ice of Public i le~ring on 2013 Proposed Eludget -
Septemb e r 17 . 2012) was p ublished on th e Official C,l y of Engl ewood W ebsi te from
• Augu st 29 20 1 2 througn September 17, 2012 .
•
State of Colorado
County of Ara p ahoe
ss
Subscr bed and swo rn lo before me on th is 17'" day of Septembe r. ?.0 1 2
My Co mm issio n E'x pires · Novembe r 8 , 2016
s EAL KEAR Y BUS H
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY ID 19964018041
MY COM'-ISSION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 8, 2016
•
•
•
GITY OF ENGLEWOOD
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
on 2013 Proposed Budget
SEPTEMBER 17, :1 6 1~
Notice is hereby g i ve n tha t the City
Council of the Ci ty of Englew oo d,
Colorado will held a Publi c Hearing
on the 2013 Proposed Bu d9..,, o n
Monday , SEPTEMBER 17 , .2\ll J, at
7 :30 p.m ., in the City Cn1Jn c il
Chambers at Engle,vood Civ ic
Center, 1000 Englewood Pa rl<.w ay ,
Englewood , Colorado. lli e purpose
of the hearing is to rac-e1ve c itizen
input concerning the 20 13 Pr.Jposed
Budget.
Interested p:,rties may express
opinions in person at th e Pub lic
Hearing , o · in writing, to be received
by the Cit1 CIPrk by 5 :00 p .m . on
Septemb ar 17 , 2012 . Anyone w i shing
to spca~ at tho Public Hearing may
call the City Clerk's Office,
303 .762.2407 or 303.762.2405, to
schedule their presentation or a sign-
up sheet will be available at th e door .
By order of th e Englewood City
Council
Loucrishia A . Ellis, MMC
City Clerk, City of Englewood
1000 Englewood Parkway
Engl ewood , Colorado 80110
PUBLISHED : August 29 , 2012
Official Web s ite of the
City o Englewood , Colorado
•
•
•
Ci 1y o f Fngll'w11od . f 'ul,,md11
2013 Pro )(ISCt.! Bud 14,:I o,•l·rvww
J ,1IHl ,U) I ,
2(1 11
l ·..,11111 ,lh.•tl
",,1 un.:c s ~,t
Fund s
Decemb er 3 1.
20 13
Us .:s of Fund s Es1i111ah!d
COVERNM ENTAL FUN D T \'l'f·...;•s_· _____________________ _
Genera l fu nd,., 1h 11 011e ,·aI1I:;.1. /1111tl of tltl ( ·u v It ,., 11,h'd 10 on:mml Jor all Ji11nn c10/ resources except fo r
ri10.1·e r~quircd to hl• ai:c:o w11L·tl ,n a,uilh c , lw ul
Spccinl Revenue Fund, m ·,·n unt /nr tit,--' proi't •Nl ,,· r,f,,;fNcijic r(•i•enue sourct!s lhtJI ar.: legally restricled to
exp£'11d it1m: /m Sf kX !fil'd f'llrfltJ \l'\
Co nscrv:111rn 1 I 111 ,1 10.07j J 10,000 309 .5 00 10.57 5
fo~1111 11u il y n r\1 1°1011111 ,•111 J50,UUU 3;;0 ,1100
D t,11111 '•, _ ·1'.!0, 122 --_ 92.500 393,780 118,842
!\l ulkv C,·111,•r Tru-,1 U,4,5.IN ,.s on 20 ,000 25 0,038
t~r~s Ull~_l{l'Cl~,ll lV ll I l_l !~l •l•l&,7 1·1 I 5,0 00 320,000 14 1,7 14
() ll'II S llll'i' l ~t~OO J 675,UII U 780.000 1,003
\'lr,hborhu,1 ll ~1,1h1l11ut1rn1 l1111g r:1111 ,, l,9 SJ 1.170.000 1.52 1,98 3
Oc lJI ~nkc F'uut.J U c..'(U lll tll for tlt i: 11 n'tm111/ar,u n and 1x1y111 1.:11 1 oflong-ti:rm debt prim:ipul um/ im1m:,\f
fl/ha them lwJx•tt!hll .i i.:11 1 a ci.:o,m1cd fo r III l'llft!rJJl'iSt: {tmds.
Cc nrrn l 01111 •111 1"11 11011,I I• 1111_11 _____ ~_H,~9_6_7 ___ 9_4_2~,0_0_0 ___ 9_5_H,~9_1J ____ J_2,~0_5_4
'Ca pil a l t•rojet l Fund,\ uu vullf /111 ji11u1i..:h1I 11 •:Jo m,:t:.\ to btt u,\·,:d for thi: a1 ·1u1 sition a,ullor consm,rtion
of major CllJ]ll(I/ facl/1//L'.'i (Ol hl!r than th osL' Ji naucl'd by proprietaryfimds or special revenue funds ).
Pu hli 1111 wt 1vc111~·111 .7. 1_~~7~}_._
i~ iil nl Pruj,·,·1s 19,39 1
l'IWl'IU E'l'A ll Y FIJNll TYl 'f:S
J:n lr.~pri.'lc Funcl l'I ac,.·0 11111 fo r opnatww·Jimmccc! and npt:m 1cd in a ma,m,.:r sm1ilar to privale busmc ss
Clllt!rJJrlJt.'f
\l.'llh:r lll,930,9•16 8,710,0 10 11 ,RI 3,124 7,827 ,832
s,,wcr 1,3°)5 ,H ~O 16,722,730 16,7 57,1110 1,36 1,470
St o m, Dr ,11n,!.L~t· B•:~~ JJ 1.685 )16,6)6 857,660
Cu lf Ciwr~,· 4•J,694 2,1 _0 1,58 ~ 2,186 ,48:\ 368 ,793
Con crcu ,ilit v 351,786 884,200 875,369 360.6 I 7
ll 11 11 ,i 11 1; Hd1ahili 1u1ion 791 .6 R5 1,000,000 1.000,000 797 ,685
lnl trna l Service Jo·unds acco1 m1 /or 1hcfi11and ng of goods or sc n •ices provid~d by one di!pt,nment or
tlJ.{t!nn • tu oth.:r departmc1 nts or agcncil!s of the guwrume111, ana to other go ,,emm emal uni l s, 011 a cm
rl'1mJ 11 n c 1111•111 basis
C.c 111 r11I C..l•r,1ci.:·; I •1.87 4 is,.,100 395.3:!4 11 2,9 50
Sl'niCt·nll'I' 98852 6 2.372,807 2,299,162 1,062,172
Ca p11JI Cq ,:i pmcn t Rc p!J cl'mc nt 1.4 )5.526 961.666 1.5 16,135 881 ,05 '
1t1 ,k \~g.£.!~ 9 1,'JHII 1,2 15,910 1,200,09~ 107,795
I~;, £_c_lk11 cfi 1, r und 1,279 5.679 ,969 5,680, I 94 1,05 4
•
!-·. t t ,
,::. ,.;!\.· ,\. I I .' ._-
■ ( h .11 ~r, 101 'cn un
j .II'' I I·,·
l'r u1 1t-r" I ,,,
■ t ,II .11 ,\ jll ,., .:11•11l •l'
I nh•r~u \ l·r run r 111 :1I H:t, t·n c--
■ f 1/l\" ,\ I !l·,,,,.l""
'I"'' ,fir I lun,•r· .. h,p .~ ( ,g:.n •I I.-I :a,, ...
I 1111 .-1
II ( "lll l)UIIC'III I 111 1'-( 1111 l nh11f11111
,,ill1•,l''llt<
r -· 1 , 1•, ,· 1 .111 .:-
( ·i1, o f Lngk,.,d. C o lu rad o
201 -' Prnpnsed Rud ge ! Overvi e w
c.;c.•n L·r a l f unl.l
J .!"l'CJ.f,IS X"'•
-1:!J.tlllU I 0 ,.,
MOUUfl !0 , ..
·,.1..:;1_,, J
1.1.,,,.:-~.t .\"· ..
C ... 11 .-,-a l t 1111rl I ,,.,
l ~cn..t1t1.,1,
El 1'111 ,l '1'!\ 1,l·•
ii F,n::-i cn n-c,
l'uhlic-\\1.1 d, ... ,
• 1)d•: 't·:,1,1
.. IIHtll {'f' .. <. -\dmm,,1nlll \ f' 'l'rl l(t•,
■ I •llllllllnt:\ :h•,l'11·1'11lt lll
lnfu r m :1 1111 11 I r ,·hnnl n!!•
.._ '\\unu·111.i l \ o un
{ I\ \U,11111..·• ,,)•:11.:
e ( ih \hrn:.i J?_rr ', I )f fi,·r
• 1 11,fl":}ll !<t•,.-Ulll.'
• I te,1c;l:UiM1 •f 11, { 1111nr1I & B11:1rth
■ t •11\Hlfl'f'.._ l0~
1 ,,1.,I r ~-,,·11.ir r,1•,
Oth('r I 111an c in f l '("'
J 1.1 I-.,·,,,,! ,mJ,
't·I 'o un"' ti '1"11 1 o f J.u u,I,
l,m,1lJ n dlt1Lu ,1.:· l 1r 111, .111;
I·~-;n;.sit•J .1:u.l H.:l.1 1 t.:l· lkh1r. Kl·w r\ ~-
}{f:>~t'nt·l
I ,· ,. ,·l· ! :,.,,,,r nc , I 111.! !t !i 111. ,· -I l ,•, 1 P1h1•r : 1 ', 1 ! ·
\!ll'JU II I
' I
-}(1('-)_41 1,::; \'I "
"··11
' 1 :
:~ I •
.\.\11 .4.\h I '',,
-l1 11:,,1 •
') .J I.I 111.lt .!I, t·1•1 •
• "'t , 11·•
City of Englewood
AGENDA ITEM 10 (b!
PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER
DATE : September 17 , 2012
A Public ~earing to gather input on Council Bill No. 4 7, a propo sed
bi ll fo r an ordinance rezoning th e O xford Stat io n TOD from Lig ht
Industrial (1-1) to Planned Unit Deve lopm en t .
PL EASE PRINT
NAME ADDRESS
7ia-Q) ~J, ~ Ir.'."") ~
~d;;)>\ -s Mowctu ·s't-,
(1,11tn 11 11 11 ·, ~k ll u1 pf ( 1,lni a d t
1JM 111 h1,111ml Ct-!'-iu u c: ll(1
Fmd t·\~·l,o d . Cr SO 11 ~
J.c (,(J~J (;j 111,-~10;-;y
Emai l l..!!.'i.E.til!.'.!....!!!.'0')1t 1_,,Jc111t•·,\.'.!...!.'fl 111
AFFIDAVIT OF
PUBLICATION
St~llL" of ( 'o\ornci 11
l'(J ULly p" Ai;1p;th<1t.'
Th,; Mfi davil of l'11l>hca11 ,,,, 1;,. the EN GLE WfJOIJ 111:R f\LD." wee.I v
new~p,qu.:r. pn ntcd nnc 1\ut li shcd 10' the Countv of Ar:1 pnhc,e. St ,1l t' ol (..'o lo~;1Jc,.
hL·rc\,~ L:LTl1 llt s th.i t 11l c rlil:Khc:J legn l 11 0111. ... e wa s publi sh ed 111 ~a id 11e wsp;tµc(01~cc
111 t·nch wt.:ck. for I :,uct:c•,:,1vc.: wc~·k(:.). thl· Ima ol wl11 :..:h p1itil;c:l!ll Oil wa :; mnck !)n v r
10 tht 7th dny o l Se ph:mhcr .A..IJ . 21.J I~. and Ihm :;op1 ::::-of t:it c·1; "'ln 1111hc:1 bt ~;l(l ·
pap ("r 111 wh ic h sc1id Pu:)hc \lot1t:t: w ;i s pt.hhshccl were ck li vi.:rcd l~·t1carriers (Jf I • ,,
1ra nsm111 ed by mri tl to e:ich 0f 1he sub!.c nb crs of S:~1d p;ipe1. :'l ccordini.; ·10·1he1 r
,.,,cJ modc<~mm ;,.:~nice , ' . • . 11~1-~ ' .. -~-·-" ·--•.·
Fo r 1he [nglewoocl I lcrn ld · " · ·•
S ta ll" of Color,1do
Couni y o f /\.lnp:i hot;
., ·•.·
Tl1l.: ,1 hc 1vt· f\lfitJ:-i, It ,,m.l Cc1tifi~t1 lt: of,l'_u bl!l_;,1111 i1. ww, ~ul,:,1.:1 jl,i;d ,utd ~w v 1t. ll'
b~fort 11 1c hy 1he ::i bovl·•1m1'.l,i.:<1 <]E R:XRJ);·~I EAi I. Y. pubh~he-r of ~.1id news p:"l pc.:r.
wlu1 1s pe:·~\·llla llv lnCl\"H 10 mr ·.~ be tht' ide,ric,1\ pcr.-o 11 111 the :-i bcwe cc11 1fkall· un
l ti~ 7th cl:i> of Sep!c mhi.:1 .-\ D i: 201::.
No t,iry Pl.bile, l)800 I') mm d l'<1 m1. ~lnte I 00.
,,ew,, .. c1. c ''""""' ,0 1 '"
Pubhc Nolicc
CITY CJ: ENCH.EWOO ll
N0 11c1: OF PUUu c .1fEARJ NO
· ! :: ?t:ik.~~ii\i·f ::i•;; ·: •
~ :Nti1icel~ho1e!>)IIIH nU1•t 1h,Clly . :
· / ,Cound l ol lh ■ ~~,~•11~.'.:igl~~/
ft: '-f"D ;.-.:1.
1'.Ju~\,;_ /da.fr ~(~'f
~ J. ~ '--Ii
• P ROOF OF PUBLICATION
City of Englewood, Colorado
Official Website
www.eng lewoodgov .org
I . Lo ucrishia A . Ellis. City Cl e rk . for th e Ci ty of E nglewot1 d . do solemn ly swear
that th e attached legal notice (Notice of Public Hearin~! on ~·-eptember 17 , 2012 on
Cou nci l 8,11 No 47 of 2012) was pub lished on th e Official City of Eng lewood Web s ite from
• Sept(Jmber 5, 20 12 through September 17 , 2012 .
•
State of Co lorado
Cou nty of Arapahoe
ss
Subscribed and sworn to before me on thi s 17'" day of Se pte ,nber , 20 12
My Commiss ion Expires November 8 , 20 16
SEAL KERRY Bu H
NOTARY PU:.JC
STATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY iD 19964018041
M'! COMMISSION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 8, 2016
•
•
•
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
NOTi.:E OF PUBLIC HEARING
September 17 , 2012
Notice is hereby given that the City
Council of the City of Englewood ,
Colorado , has scheduled a Public
Hearing at a Regular City Council
Mee t i ng on SEPTEMBER 17 , 2012 , at
7 :30 p.M . i n the City Council
Ch amb ers of Englewood Civic
Center, 1000 Englewood Parkway, to
gather public input on Council B i ll
No . 47 rczo n•n g the Oxford Station
TOD from Li ;;ht Indust rial (1 -1 t to
Planned Un it Development. All
interested parties may express
opi nions in person at the Public
He aring or in writing to be r eceiv ed
by the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m . on
September 17, 2012 . Anyone
wishing to speak at the Public
Hearing may call the City Clerk's
Office , 303 .762.2405 or 303 .762 .2407
to schoduli;i the i r pres r.ntation or a
s ign-up s h ee t will b e available at th e
d . ,.
By ord er of
th e Engl ewood Ci ty Council
Lou c r ishia A. Ellis , MMC
City Clerk , City of En g lewood
1000 Engl ewood Parkway
En :ilewood , Co lorado 80110
PUBLISHED : September 5, 2012
Official Website of th e
City of Englewood , Colorado
Cc1111111 111111, \kd1.i c,f Cnlo,udl•
91':t >O 11 \T,lm i~I C 1-S une !{Ill
l.11:,;lt:\\1•·.td L,1 M.tl I~
~
o~.C2~!~o \ .. ·· ···•,'1
i,OTARr \
-----f !\h CP111 .111~~u1 n E,p rcs1t 'l l lo
BLI'-...-;si --,.,
1.,1:1ry l1ubl1 r tJS011 11~ :·:i11 11d ( 0u n. S ut h: . 01.1.
En f lcwoucl Color:1J0 80111
Public N0liC0
CITY OF ENGlEWOOO
NOHCF. or PU RL C IIEAfUNO
hptu~t.o.• u ,~on
•
•
COUNCIi COM M UN I CA TION
DA Tf . Sep te111be 1 F . 2012 AGEN D A IT[M: SUB JECT . PubliL H~d 1i11 g fur 0 1di n,111Lt'
: ,e zoni n g O xfo ,d Sta tion TOO fro i,1 Li ght
10 b i lnd us t ·ia l ti · 1) 10 Plan ned U1r t iJ ev e lopme n·
(l'UO)
I N ITIATED BY : \ sro.FF so,:RcE : Aud ra L. Ki,k. Planr e r I
Conn 1u nit y :Jeve lopment
-
COUNC I L GOA i AND l'RFVI OUS COUNC Ii ACT ION
Co un cil co nS1 dere cl 1he nr dinanc ~ fo r the O xtor cl S1,11io n PUO 100 at fir st re a ding o n Se pt e mb er 4, 20 12.
RE COMM EN DEU ACTI ON
Staft recomm e nds tha t Co un cil consi der 1es ti mony d u,ing a Pu b hc Hearin?, on the 0,1o rd Stati o n TOD
l'UD .
BACKGROUND
The Pl;m ned U ni t D eve lo pm en t is a re.!o nIng process tha t es lablis hes sp eci fi c zo nin g an d si te pla nn ing
cril e na lo mee t Ihe needs oi tl spe<.i fi c dt!vel opme nt pro posa l tha t may not be ~.:commo dat ed w1 1hin
ex is tin g zo ning de\el opm ent regu lati ons A PU D 1ez o111 ng pro vid es the op port unity for un iried
developme nt control for multip le prop e,tte:> o r mult ip le l1se s.
This pr oper ty is" 3 .504 acre sit e occ,•p ied by ~la rli n Plast ics sin te 19 ~0. Th e sit e was recentl y pu rc hased
hy 1h e a;J phcan1 Th(' pa ,c?I ha s bee n zoned 1.1 Li gh t lndu stri.1 1 si nce be ing a ,111 xe d 111 10 the Citv of
Englewood 111 1970
PUD JVERVIE W
The Ox fo rd Sta ti o n roo PUD at Ox ford Ave n ue ,ind So u th ,,va10 Street "'ill change •1,e Pe rrni ned
i1n ncip,1 I Use~ to all ow rn ullipl e uni t re siden tia l use~ Othe, r1 ll owe d w,cs in th e PUD ,11 c out lin el-' u,,Jcr the
Tab le of All owed Uses in ,he W ritt en Sta tem e nt
l he pro poserl PU D '"II con tain 252 ror lease apanni ents These w ill be in ·,wo bu ld in gs that are co nneued
at fl oc,rs 2 th ro ugh 5 The Plannin g :ind Z cnmg Co mrn1ss 1,J n requc .. ste d 1ha t a he iuki 1 lim it atio n of 100' he
set dS a co ncf i11o n of appro val. In addit ion 10 t1 :.1 one rind two u111 1 arortments. the si te w ill also con 1r1 in
par km g for the untl s, c1 poo l and rec r.:>clli on spac e .
• The p.1rkm i~ 111 th e pr::>pose d PUD ,,,il l be I sp Jce io r eve ry unit , 11nd \'is it or ,~ark in g ;1t I space r;:,r every 5
u111t s. Tl ,e ~u11ou:11 of requi red sp Jces wou ld be 25:! res ,d E-nt par kin g spa ces a1 1d 51 visitor pa,~ ng sp.1:es
to r a to tal o f 303 spa ces. Th e a ppl·ca nt h;s p rO\rd'!d a srt e plan w,th a par kin g ch art that ,nd rcates th at a •
to ta l o f 335 spa ces wo ul d be p rovi ded. Th e UDC requ ir es 1.5 spaces p e r un t, o r a to tal or J 7e. Al,ho ugh
the pro p osed p a rking s •13 fe" e r spa ces I an City req ui re me.1ts, stall is sa trs fie d that th e re w ill be suffi ie nt
J1;1 rkin g fn r re,i cl en ts ;\ccpc;c; 10 rPs ide n t p;i r king o n the c.ite will be c n n trolled h y ;i g,1 1r . RPc;i c!P nl s of the
propo~ed d eve lopment w ill r12'ce ive one acces~ c.1rd to the re!'..idc nt p ;:irk 1ns Jreas p er oedroom .:md w ill b e
re qu ir e d to pay fo r a ddit ;o n a l s pac s Th is pa rki n g stra tegy will e ns u-c that parking d mand ,,ill 110 1 excee d
th e av ,t il .iiJ le )U µpl y. t\11 g ues 1 pd 1k11 ,g w ill b e w 1t hi11 the prope rty, bu t will 110 1 rc 4ui rc ,1 µ,.11 k111 g ,1ut"~~
ca rcl .
Th e o lig in al la ndsca p i ng p lan provid e d to th e Plann111 g an d Z ni ng omm is s1o r. cid no l shm•v a Landsc,1pe
Cr1lcula tio r: Chart A t that tirne it \\as uncPar 1.d 1e ther th e propo".ied lan d sca pin 5 111 "1 lily st;rnd;u ds ThP
JrJp lic Jn ~ h ;is pro\ 1ded :rn updJte d L.:111dscapin g Pl,111 (s hee l 5 o f 8 111 [:-.h 1bi1 A) th at show; th:H the pro\ 1dr.>d
landscaping exceed s th e required amo u nt, 111 both .1rea an d ma te r.al
The µroposed sr gnage rn the PUD wo uld all ow 2 sq uare feet of sr gnag e for ea ch lin e ar foot or str ~ct
ir ont ag This p roposed amo unt of sig n ag e co uld be up 10 1.6 sq uar feet larg er than rhe c urr e nt si en code
w ould all o w . Tl 1er a re 11 01 a rnax in 1u 111 num ber o f sig ,s th a t wo u ld be a ll o·.ved .
Under th e U D C , 4.65 a c res \vo ulrf be req111 re d (or pa rk la nd d ed 1ca t1 o n, or ;i fee 1n l11Ju l f ded 1ca 11o n i n thi:?
amo unt o f $0 7,000. The ,1ppl1 c.:1 nt ha s re qu es te d that 50 pe rcen t o f this fee be ,,.i1ve d
At th e Pl,1 1m 1n g and /o nmg Co mrni ss1o n public hea r111 g, t ilf1c ir npa c.:ts and iJ edestr idn ,1 ccess we re rc1i se d
as concern s. The 1,ahi c im pac t Jn aly)is ond ud ed that tile developmen t wou ld h ave a lirn11 ed impac t on
the surro u nd ing street ne t·.vor k; 1h 2.1 lc \'e ls o f service \\OUld reff ain co:1st ant. "Jh e 1~r1 ffi c impac t anal vs i)
cons id e red 1he ad ditio n o f p ro t!?c l e d/permi ssive l ett tu rn pha si ng ior n orthbou nd le ft ttirn) o m o wes:bou nd •
Oxford . \•V hile the le (t turn arrow woul d .;ss ist in rn aki ng left turn s, 1he ,oncer, i) havinu e noueh st :.1 ck ng
Jre,1 o n O xfo rd fo r ca rs tu rni ng onto Oxford 1rom 'ava j o, JS wel l as impac ts o n the ove r:i ll i nter;ectio n
uµe1,H1ur1. /\ r11 ur~ dt!tdil t:!U ".i tuU y ~hu1..1 ld ULt.u r l n~fu ,e un pl~n )t:ntat,on t~ fu 1 tile , ... onside1~d. Pu b li c \•Vo rk s
staff reco n~m e nds morn to ri n g the con ge stio n l evels at this inte rsec tion in the fu 1ure in o rd er to add ress any
a djus tm e nts to the signal at that tim e. Th e applic an t's tr affi c co ns ulta n t has res ponded to staf1 trai tr c 11 npact
comm nt s (a tt ached) a nd th e tra ffi c im pa c t anal\'s is has be e n revrsed based on th ose comm e nts . The
req 1ie~tPd rev is ion,;, d id 110 1 rrsull i n signifi c;rn t ly diffe rc-i n t concl us ions concerni n g traiiic i:npacts.
Pe d es tri an access fr o m th e s uth 10 th e Oxford lighl r;i il st ati o n re; currentl y ;i chi1 ll e11gc . f hc rc is no
p e d e)tri .:in .._,u~~w ,1 lk u n the we~t leg of the int t."1sec 1ion du e ;o the l 1igh leve l of tq 1d .. uafi ic IL.m in g ld t
i1 om Nav,1 10 Esw b llsh ing 1h1 s crossw.1lk wi th suffic ien t c rossi n g time would be dif;ic ul r b'.?ca use of 1he
l ength 0 1 s1g nJl timing cvcles need ed to k ee p tra tt1 c m ovi ng 1h 1ough the Ux(o rd /Nava jo and O'<iord /~ant,1
Fe in tersec tio ns. In addi tio n, a pro p osed "b ulb-out" a, th e sou thwest corn er f th e Oxfo rd / ,wa 10
111t e rsec 11o n has been recon,rnen ded to b e del e te d becau se a w ide turning r11d ius 1s n e e ded to
acco1nmod,11 e !ruc k traftic.
Pc d t::~l ,i,rn t.u 11 111;:diu ti".i Jlt' Ut.'i11 g ~tlh.l it:d ,.1s p J1t o ( tile ~!J tiu11 a1 e ,1 p l,11111 ing p ,occsc;. nme ntl v undc 1,v,1 y
a nd recc mmendJtions 10r im pro\ emenis will be ro nhcoming. Th e ap plican t 1s involved 111 1he s ta tion are a
p lanni ng process and has 1nd1ca 1e d a d -?s irc to ac cornm oda t reas onab le req ucsb 1or un orovemcnb
affecti ng the su bject prope rtv , includ mg s1d cw~1 lk w ideniny11 lam.heaping and re , ova l ut on•s tr eet parkin g
al nng N.w.,j r, lm i,r o vrng p e d es tria n a ccess to the Oxfo ri lig ht ,.,ii stat ro n d oes no t a,d should no t res t
so lely w llh thb dpphc ant. Decisio n s regardmg pedestria n 11n p1ovemems sho uld be d Pf PrrPd 11n 1i: 1h;,
i ss u ilnce o f ,,-, ·J uil di ng perm it for thi:, p ro;cc 1.
lmp rove1r1 e 11 1s to traffic signals, sidewalks and 1h e rig ht-o f-way in g nera l Jre 1101 p .irt o ( :he PUD )mte the
PUD covers o n ly 1:1e p rivat e property involved in the re,ollln g However, l he Jppl ca n t ts rt!qt1es t1:1g
(}0~414 (24) , :J
•
•
1ina ncial assistance fo r 1111 pro\'eme111s be ing p roposed in the righ t-o i-way . Somt o f th e im p rove ments 10
prov ide acces, lo a p otenl i<l l p~dP~tn ,111 hrirl gP O\'n O\'.fnrrl (c:.t,u r,;., r;i mr,. ,rnrl/nr willhv1)1,;.) rn;iy hP
pa rt iallv loca l ed in right-of-way o r on LCP prope ,1 r "1 th in exis tin g e ase,1e11 1s Approv al o f finarci~1 I
o1 ss1s t,1nce 1s ,11 th e concep 1w1 leve l and detail s \\ 1H n-?ed to be tm.il,z.ed as the !>'.J t1 un area plan pro gre)S ... 5
ancJ hdore the fm al si te p la n is a p prO\ eel .is part ot th ~ bui lding pe rm it for this deve lcpmt:!nt.
FINA NCIAL IMP ACT
I he C11y o ( Lng lcwooJ \\'tll co ll e I a on e-lime Buil dmg Use T,,x 0 1 approxi ma1ely $-l 72,500, an vs l irn ated
f11r ni1 urc, ti \'.llircs a nd e q u iplll ent use tu, o ( $17,S00, a one-ti me b u ilding perm it iec o ( a p p roximate ly
$87,500 an d the rezo ning applica l ion tee o f S 1,500 111 ad ditio 11 , the Ci ty will collec t pro p ert y tax o f
ap pro,1n1 at e ly $2 6,000 p e r )1Ca r" ,lt ful b111lch ut. 1hi ,; 1s an in c rease of approxim.,te ly $:!~,70D per yea r ove r
current p 1ope1t) t,lxes collec letl on tli~ µIu p1::Il~. A p drk ft:e II1 licu uf Ut-Lfi t.dl1u 1· in 1l1 t:: d l l111u 11 t uf S97 ,:l 0
b also re qurred. l\ctual 1e\ enue> col lecte d rna; change If Co unci l appro\es all or p il rt cf 1he 111ce n11ve
request being propo sed by the rtnph can t.
11 ST OF AH1\CHME TS
Pl .1 nnin g ,111rl 7oni1g (nn unic.,;,in n t;1M1 R1 -pnr:
Planrnng ~ind onhn Co 1rnn1 s)io n Mmu te~
Pl,1n111 11 g ;1·1el l'.0 11 1·1 ~ l o 111m1 ss 1o n h nd 1ngs 0 1 1-ilti
Tratfic lmp;i ct .'\rulv sis a nd Consu 't;,nt Respon es to S:aff Conrn e n ts
• Bi ll fo r O rdi n,111ce
•
•
•
•
TO :
THRU :
FROM :
DATE :
SUB JECT :
APPLI CANT:
PIMrn in g anrl Z oning Corrnn i~sio n
Ala11 \rV hite, D ir ec tor, onm1urn ty DE"v elo 1)111 e nt
A u dril L. Kirk. Plann e r I
t\ug t1 s t 7, :!O I ~
Ca se ZON201 2-005 · Public l l c,1 ri 11 g
Ox fo rd Si alio n
I U' U,tord I Ll.
-71 1 So ulh Ne,.i c:a Slreet
I 11 1le 1on , 0 80 120
PkvPERTY OWNERS :
LC P Oxfo rd LL C
571 1 So u1h ev ac a S1reet
l.i I1 le 1u 11, CO 801 20
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
t 366 Wcs1 Oxfo rd A ve nu e
REQUEST:
lhe appli ca nt h as su bm itt e d ar, ,1pµlica 110P 10 r ezon e 1h e .r bove par cel 1ro 111 1-1 I i gl,t
l nd u sl n,,I zo n ing l o d PliD PIJnnecl U 11 i1 Dcv<'lopm C'n t. Th e p ro p osed PU D w ill h.w e 2 2
(two hun d re d J11 d fifty 1w o) dwc ll ,ng units.
REC0MMENUA TJ ON:
Th e Dcpar1111 e111 o f Co rnrnuni1 y D cveloprn e n1 rcco n1111 e 11 J s 1h ,11 11,e Plan nin g ,111 d 7o ni "';
C o rnrn r~sio 11 .r pp ro ve Ox iord S1,11 ,o n PU il .,~ wi l h l h P fo ll owrn g con d ilro n s:
1. RL·11 1uvl' Uu lU uub fr u 111 N;I\ c1 jo .
' Pr ovid e la ncl sc<1 pe c<1l cul.1ti ons.
,111 ,1 :orw.1 rd i\ reco111rn c ncb 1ion o t ,1pprov,1 I l o ·;1y Co un cil.
I FC-;AJ OF SCR IPTI ON:
Tl I A.T P,\RT or T E SE 1/-l OF EC -l -5-68 O(SC ,,s llF.G 5 Fr W & 3 ~.75 FT ' OF E
COR or LC T I GOORMAN S IN D USTRIAL SUB l H W 3 40.63 FT TO ., PT O I f l.Y ROW
I l ~E O F AT & SF RR TH ELY ,\LG SD ROW 557 ,T MIL TO A PT ON TH F. S ROW I.I E
O F W OX FORD AVE TH N F. 165 FT l\\fl TH SE 52.Y4 FT T S 83.88 FT TH E 3.5 FT Tli S
1 0 FT M /l TH E 1 .5 i FT TH S 3 14 .46 1·1 TO BEG SEC 4-5-68
70NE DI STRICT:
I 1 I igh t lndu striu l
l'KOl'Ufll' LUCA 1 I ON ANLJ SUKl{OUNLJ IN G LANO USE:
Th e subj ect pr o perty o f l his PU D is locat ed al th e so ut hwest co rner o f O xford Avt>nu e a11 d
So uth av aj o Stree !. Su rrou11 c!i11 g IJ11d to th e 11 o rt h, so uth and east is also zo 11 ed 1-1. Land
di rec tl y to th e wes t is the RTD Li gh t Rai l tr acks ,rn d the BS r rail ro ad tra cks and no t w ithin
th e City o f E11glewoo cl limits.
l'U D PROCED U RE:
Rezo ni11 g to a PUD requires th e applic an t to h;ivc a pre-applicat io n m eet,ng w ,th sta ff , a
ne1gh bo 1hood m ee ting w ith own ers il nd Ier1<111t s locat ed 1,000 iec t o f the ro pose d r u o.
A ft er th e neighbo rh ood m ee tin g a io rrnal sub,rnttal ,s mad e to th e C ity ,ind reliewed by
C ity d ep artmen ts an d o th e r affec ted o utside agenci es. A publi c hear ing is he ld l)eiore th e
Pl ;mning .,111d /o nin g Cn mmi c.'-in n .ind Ci tv rrn 111 r il If th :• Pl Jn i,;;, ,q1provPd 1hrr<' i\ :"t 30
day rc fc rcn du rn ti m e p ri od befo re pcnnits ca n be gr~rnt ci.
BACKGROUN D:
Th e Pla n ned U ni t D eve lo pm ent i~ ,, rt•1oning process th,1I stab li shes spc:c ili c to nin g ,incl
site planning c rit eri a to m ee t the nee d s o f" sp ec ifi c developmen t pro pos al that m ay no t be
.:i cco rnm od ,1t e d with in ex islin i:) 7onin g develop m e nt re gubti o ns. A PUD rezoni ng provi des
tl,e o ppu I tu1111 y fo r u111 f111 cl deve lu p111 e11 I c.011I,ul fu , n,uili plc p ro pe,ties 0 1 rnu itipl e uses.
I his p ro p e rty is a 3.504 acre ,it occ upied b l' a M ,irti11 Plas tics sin ce ·1 9c0 . Thi s pJr cel has
b ee n ,a ned 1-1 Light Indu stri al since b ein!l ann e,ed into th e City nf Englewood 11 1 1970 .
NEIGHBOR!-1000 MEETING SUMMARY:
Pursuant to th e U nifi ed Deve lo pment Code PL O p roc clur e, th e applicant co ndu cted a
nei ghbo rho od m ee tin g o n W ed ncs dJ \, M arch I. cO I~-pri o r to sub mi tt in g the PU D
,1pplic:t l io n. o ti ce 0 1 th e p rc-.1 p pli c.1t io n m ee ti ng WJ5 mail ed to owner s Jnd te na nts of
prop rty loca teJ w it hi n 1000 fee t o f the proposPcl ruD pr opert y. t\ mee tin g S111.llllilfY IS
1ttac hcd tSee Exh1b 1t ,\.
C ITY DEPARTMENT AND DIVl~!ON RFVlFW :
I he .ipplic.1n ts h.1d ,1 pr e .1 ppli c;i1i on m ee ti ng w ith ~t.111 in bt e :!O 11 . Issue$ th;i t \\Crc
id C'11 1ifi d Uu ri11g tl 1e ; .. m.:!·ll1J1Jli Ldl iu 11 111e d in g \\ot..:l l.:' ~1dd 1l':'.'l~L'd Uy tl ll' .-1ppl iL L11 1l \rnd ti 11: fir1r1I
Oxfo rd S1,1Ii o n PUIJ p,icke t w ,1 s submi t ted o n Jul y 6, 20 12. the tlna l pl,111 1 were 1c\1eweti
b y Ci ty ,111d o u ts ide Age nci es ,ind th ,· fo ll o·N i11g co111111 c111; were m ade:
Ir ,-Co un ty I lealrh Departm ent:
I . Contac t TC H D to disc u ss the pl ,11 1 to alJa ndon th e ,,rnit,iry sewer sys tcI11 .
2. Scct1 0 11 16-6-2 oi th l.11 gle wood U ni1i cd M uni ci pal Co d e (U D C) req u ires a
fl am mah le 8dS les ling an rl ;i ;i pr nv~I fn t developn,Pnt lnrrtl Prl ·.vi lhin nnP 1hoi 1,.:i nrl
fee t of a fo rm er land fill. 1 Cl ID rccor11 rn c 11 ds t°·1at the applica nt wo,I : wit', a q 11 ali ·i ed
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
cnvir o 11m cnl al co nsulta nt to prepare a un,m.Jbl e gas 11wC$l ig.1 ti on p!.J.:, io r the r.1t e
Th is will be required p rio r l o th e is~uin g o f J bu ilding p ermit.
XcP I FnPr gy:
I . Th e Pub li c Se rvice o mpany o f o lo r:1cl 0 (PSCo) owns and o perat es exis tin g na tura l
gas and electri c d istri bu tio n fac il i ties w ithi n th e p ro pose d p ro ject area. The
d eve lope r m ust co nt ac t the Buil der's all Li11 e ,,t 1 800 6 28 -2 12 1 a11 d compl e te th e
ap pli c,1ti on process for any new gas o r elec tri c se rvice, o r mo d,ii cat io n l o ex istin g
faci liti es.
Br--S I·:
The cl , ·loper inu ,t conta ct Roby n La m, (R i gh t-o f-W,1y ,\ge nt ,1t 303-7 16-204 3 fu r
rPc;o h ll iCH , l o P, c;p m ('l n! ic;c;11 pc;
l OC.<..,11 111 •··,,,
Colorad o Depart1 .1e 11t o f Tra11spo rt at io n:
1. Nu Lu 111111 •11t.
RT0 MC/12 ,J
lom111en ts were ,,:i t prov i ded fr o m this Agency.
Ci ty f Sheri do"
f'.,3g e2of3
I . W hd t pr ucess does yuur cunditiu n,1 1 use fo lluw? A re ti , •v o utlin ed in the U DC? Ii
so, where/ Yo u m ight w an t to spel l th e process ou t o n th e PUD o r refer l o th e
p rocess in th e code.
D es i gn ~tand arcl s ,",, L w cl el111 s
2 . Th e lan guage 1s good, b ut use m o re specifi cs on cl es,,;n glllcl elin es espec iall y.
3. "The ele m en ts in th e ioll owin g stancla rd s" ... is th e followin g the stand ard s?
Pag e 2 o f 8
4 . V\lu 11 't tl1 b llc1,,e u tli e, u se!, l.Je~id e!, rc~i de r1 li,il ? Du yuu 1e dl1 ~1 w L111 t .i !,eu111t y gd te?
'l I.;. thP i;;rn 1th bui ldin g rt '1 c;1 ry htJild ing .,, wpll ?
6. O nl y o ne e ntrance to th e bu il cl111 g? Where ,s the eme rge ncy en tr ance/e~il to
clcvc lopni r nt ?
7. Add "c urrent " to Zonrn g I 1, Curre nt Us ~: A ut o par ts wa rehouse.
8. Fen e .iro u 11<J pool ?
9. 13a1e m e11t par kin g; in bo th bwldin gs?
I 0. Lan clsc,1p ing?
I I . ls this a ea r.1ge en tr a,,re l (nnri h pnrl of Past b 11il rli ne)
11 "New 5'0" wi d e si dew<1l k/step s from R.O .W . to fir e drive ai sle" Wh ere 1s the fi 1e
drive Jis Jel
13. Sta irs -la be l stai rs to th e pcdest1 iJ n bridge.
Shee t 5 o f 8
I 4. Devel opment is m isspe ll d , chan ge to read PUD Si te Plan
I 5 . tv\a 1r11 ena nce Nol e? lmga 110 n?
Sh ee t 7 oi 8
16. Roof line cou ld have mo re arti cula tion .
Cit y of E glewood D cpMtm cn t Reviews:
U tili ties:
I . Pu rsud nt to Ci ty Ord inan ce. each se par,11 c building in a plann ed u nit d eve lopm ent
,h~,I1 h;i vp ~ ,;pp.:H·,1 1p ,;prv ir P lin P
2. Fi re protec tio n rcquircn 1e nt ~ m.1 y req ui re rnuhi ple fir e lines for th e bui lCing.
Fire :
1. I nra tinn anrl wid th o f p ro posed security ga te and fi,e hyd ran ts ,n ee l s fire
dep;1r t111 cn 1 ;ippr ov al. Th e secu rit y [p ie w ill be requ ired to ha,,e a Knox Access Key
rr atll c .
I . l he ramp on th e so ulh buildin g, is th, full time accessl Is it lo a parking ga rage?
Eng 111 ee 11ng :
I . Rev i sed dra in.,;;~ repo rt was sub1111 tt ed July I. 10 11 .111 c' is curre ntl y our for rev iew.
2. Stai rs ,ti the Oxfc rd ;rn d Nava jo w ill nee d to be s;ructur.:-i ll y f::'11 gi11 Pe n11 g
). Ta ke th e lo cati o n o f th e pe des tri an bridge off. t\d d: Wi ll grant City of En gle wood
brid ge easeme; 11 .vh en loca ti o n is de te,m ined .
4. Sla if req ues t ed th at tli c bulb o ut s b e removed fro m th e site plan and th e c ur b an d
[lllfl er remain as is . Th e applic,111 1 ha d ciPc irl erl In IPavP l hP hu lh 11 11 1, in l hP pbn .
Th e bulb o u ts w ill no t be ap ~rovcd. Staff w il l cont inu e 10 wo rk w ith th e app lica nt 10
fin d a so lution 1ha 1 is acce ptab le bv staff and th e .1pplica 111.
Comm uni ty r)~ve lnprnPn t :
I . Sec comme nt s b elo w .
PUD OVERVIEW:
f l,-, Oxford St,11i o n PU D al Ox ford .'\ve nu e ,111 d Sou th Na va jo Str ee t w ill cl angc 1he
I-' r111111 d l'nnc,pal Uses to allow a res 1de nt1.il uses. O 1h e1 all owed uses i n the PUD are
o utlin ed un der th e Tab le o i All owed U ses i n t he W rill en S1atcme11 1.
Si te Pl,111 ; Th applican t i s p,opos ing to build 252 uni t for -lease apa rtme nts. fhc entire
sit e ,s 3.504 ac re s and w ,11 co nsis t o f l wo ap artm ent bu ddin gs co nn ected at th e seco nd
0oor. Th e s,t c also in cl udes pa rking for the u nits. a pool and rec rea tion area.
landscapi n g: I he applica nt 1s propos mg the io ll ow1ng lands cJp111 g m1111mu ms:
Tr ees : 1/-'50 square fee t oi Requir ed L,mds ca pr Area (RL A)
Shrub s: 1/50 squa re feet of RLA
•
•
•
•
•
•
M i nimum nu mb er oi tr e s between th e principal stru ct ur e and curb : 1 /50 li near
fee t
M inim um number o f shrubs between th e pr1 nc1pal structure and curb : N o ne
Alth ough th e nu mber of tree, the applicant i s ,equiring is more th an th e Ci ty rcqui re r'lent.
th e arn ou rll o • shru bs and numbl:r of tr e~s ~nd shru bs be t\\een principal stru cture and curb
Is less than it y rQqu irements. Tabl e 1 o-6-7.4 Mi rnrnurn La ndsc ape Requ1re rn er11 s in
Comrn <.'rc iJI ;rnd r\l\edi cal ;onc,s h ,l S ,, r quir C'rnc nt of .1 m inimum oi 50 % o f tree~; 10 b e
1>l aLed be twee n the pri nr:rp al stru ctur e dn d th e cur b . A 1nInImum 40% oi shrubs sho ul d be
pl ace d !:>e tw ec n th e prrncrpa l str uc tur e ano the curb Thi s is a requirem ent f r :,1d ewal<s
greater than 3' wi de. Sidewa lk s lec.s th <rn 3' wide r11 i!y be l.inds co pcrl w ith liv in g and no 11 -
livin g µl o, II n,,1 1eri.1I. The sue plan di d no t ird 1cate th w idt h o i the s1dew;ilk .
The lall'iscape calculati o ns o n th e sI1 e pl,111 h;11 e bee n removed. II is 11 ncl e,1 r at th is tim e if
the propose d PUD wil l rn ee l th e min imum requiremen ts ior the City of Eng lewood .
The C11y o f Eng lewood rcq uPs ts that l;indscap in g be bro ught up 10 City stancl ard s.
Sig nagc : ·1 he pro p osed l'UD will allow 2 squ,1re ie e1 0 1 sIgnage for e,,c h lrne ar foo l o f
S1ree 1 frontage. l h P U DC all ow, the followmg:
1.0 s . ti / I foo t
Q .• 1 s . ft .I I foot
Th e pr o pos ed sig n ar ea could be up 10 1.6 squar e fee t lar ge r than th e UDC would all ow.
·1he re is no n:ax imum numb er of sign., ti al wou irl be all owed.
Ind ividua l b usin esses wo ul d each be .,:k,• -:eel I projec tin g sign , not 10 excee d I 2 squ or c
fee t in are a.
Pa rk i ng: Th e park in g In th e proposed PUD w i ll b e one (I ) sp ace fo r eve rv unit .• 1ncl visi to r
par ki ng at I space ior eve ry 5 u1111 s. Tite am o unt of req uired spaces wo uld be _52 r~sid ent
par kin g c:i \J ices ,i nd 51 visil o r µJ rkin g sp,1rcs for i1 lota l of 303 sp ;i ccs . Th e ,1 p p li c a nt has
provi ded a sII P pl ;11), •1th a p;irk;ng r har l. n,,, p.1rki 11g r hart 11H fi ca1 rs 11t a1 :, 10 1;11 oi 1 1S
sp ,ices would be p rov id ed .
Tlie UCC requir es I .'.> spa ces per unrt and gu e;t p,1rk11 1g 0 1 I space per 5 units. Acco rd ing
l o the UDC parki n g requir eme nts 1h 1s project \\Ou ld need lo ha ve 370 spaces ior reside nt
par king .,ncl 5 1 sp .:i ces for visit o rs fo r a to tal o f 429 spaces .
Staff Is reques tin g J Pa rkin g Man ageme nt Plan o r Parking l nce11 1i ve Plan be pr ov id ed. The
Pla n shou ld address th e sho rta ge in pa rk r g and how park ing will be h.rndl ecl o n the sit e
SUMM1\RY:
Th e appli am ,s pr opos ing re-zon i11 g an ex 1s1i11 g 1-1 11.ight lndu s1r ial) 10 a PUO 10 incl ude
res ident ial uses. Staff is req ue·ti n g al th is tim e th at the la nd scap ing be bro ugh t u p to the
5t;111d,1rds o f th e UOC. St,,ff is also rcq u sting thc,t a P.1rking ~1an ;1gc mcnt Pl.111 or P,1r ki ng
Ince nti ve Plan be a co nd iti o n c,f ap p,o va l.
Pt.AN NED U .\/IT DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS:
rh e Cunirn is,ion n,u,t cle t ,m i ne ,f th e PUO i s co ir sis tcn t wi th th e Ln gl ewoocl 2003
Co rn pr('he nsive Pla11. Th e Plan11 i11 g ancl Zon ing Co 111m iss io 11 can approvl', app rove w it h
rnn rlitions o r d,:,ny the proposPd Pllf).
~stnct Plan
The ni<.tri r1 Plan c;r t, fort h thP zn nin n rrg11l ,1tio nc; under w hi ch lhP propnc;prl il mr ndrnPn ts
w ill occur.
7 he PUD Dr str ict Plan rs. or •~ out. 111 cur ,iorm,mc e wrth th e Dr stri ct l'/ar, rPq1111c•n 1,m1s anc /
th Compreh en sive Pl,r:,.
·1 he p roposed PU D is in co nlonna nce w it h th e Dis tr ict Pl .i n and th e Compreh en sive
Plan . Th e Oxford Li ght Rai l Transit <;tat:o n is ,pecifically ad rl rPssPd in th P Rna clm;,p
[11g le vo ocl : ~OO J [n glPwood Comprehensive Pl;, ll stal es, "The pro spec ts fo r
d eve lopm en t ir1 the areas a,ou nd 1he xfo rd LR I Sta ti on are p rom1s 1ng. I.an d uses
;rnrl p rnpe rt iP,;, 1h,1t h;ivp hPPll c.tagn;.111 1 or in rl ecli nr fo r ,1 111 1rn hPr o ( yP,1r'-m .i y givP
way l o vibrant new co mm ercia l uses atlrac tecl 10 the ar ed c u e-to th e pr oxi rr111 y o f a
li gh t rai l transi t s1,11ion an d the p re sence o i th e Eng lewood Rec reation Ce nt er ,1n d
Englewood Golf Course".
2. All re')uirecl documen cs. clrawings, rcle,,als, reco mm enclac ion s. Jnc/ approvals have Ileen
r eceived
All appropriate d o cu 111 ents (.O nce ,ni ng O,ford Sl dti on PLD ha ve been rccl'ived;
however th e 1;roposecl PUU has no t been appoved ,.,\' dll d epartmen t;.
]. Th PU D 01 stfc t PI Ltn is con s,s tcnl with ,1rlupt c rl Jnr/ gcnr rully .JCCt..·pt c r/ :..1.m cfa rc!s oi
cfc>velopn1Lnt in lh l' City ui E11g /e wuuc.J .
The Ox ford Station PUD Dis tri ct Plan , rem.ti ns co 11 sisl en1 wi th ;tccep 1ed
clev cluµ1rr enl ,l.ind ,,rch es t.il,li ,lied U\ the Ci l \' of 1:nglewuL I.
4. The Pun ni:..trict Pldll ;, q,')i.1 .. 111tit:1fiy rnr.(,i<;tPr;; \Vi ' .i , 1i11::i en;1/~. nli1r>rriv r '-(/p ,;,ien
gurcl elu,cs, polici s and an)' o the r o rdi11 J ncc-, law nr rcquirc Prcnl o( tlic Cit y.
Oxfnrrl S1a11 o n PUD is in rnnio rm,rncc wit h JII o the r o rdin,111 ces , laws an d
reciuirement s o f th e City.
6
•
•
•
•
•
•
5. Wh en 1/Jc l'UU Uistri ct /'Ian is w11/Jin the tnglewvod Oo,,,ntown Developll1 cnl Authority
(EDDA ) area , th e Pbn i, cnnsi,rent with the ED D ,~ ,,pprovcd rl c.sig n.,, polic,c.1 and pl.ins.
l\ot applicabl e.
PUD Sit e Plan
Th e Sile Pla11 sets ior1 ·1 th e site ~lanni ng and d esig n pa rame ter s under which the prop os ed
amendments will occur.
Th P Pl JD <iif,'3 Pl;,n ,,, nr i r... nnt . in r·onfnm1,mn ;) with th P l)ii;;tri r t Plan rf'ffUir P.mPnts .
Oxford SlatiOP PL'D sil e plan e stabli shes lh e ar•angement, orie11l,1tio11 , loca lion, and
the building e nvelopes on 1h e site w hi ch are in conform a nce wilh tli e Dislrict Plan .
Th e proposed ,mpr ovem enl s o n Na v.1jo have not b een app roved . Staff will co ntinu e
to wo rk with the ,,pphc,mt to rescke the se issues.
2 All requ ire d documents, Jrawin~s, reierrdls, rccomm ~nc!a!io n.s. ,,nd .approv,,I; have been
rccr .. •ive d.
3
All required site plan materials hav e been received . Th e pro posed PUD has 11 0 1
been approved by ,i ll departments .
Th e PUD Sire Plan is consistent with ,,doptec/ an d gen er.al!;, ,1 cceptec/ .,tan cl.irds of
c/e ve/0;,1: ,enl of th e City of Eng/pwood.
ll.e Oxford n ,LJ is consistent w ith rl evelopment standards se t iorth 111 th e lli slri c t
Plan . Th e Develo1;me11t Review Team reviewed •he sit e plar, and determi11ed that
lh e a suhst ,,ntial arnnunt nf thP pr oposa l mPPl s Pstah!ishPrf City rfPvt>lnr,m e nt
s1 andards, hnweve r ther e ar e unr esolved is,ues. Staff will co nt inu e to work wi 1h the
.1pplicant to reso lve th ese is sues .
ti Ti1e PUD Site Pl.,n is sul_1 _r;r.1nti.:1l!11 consiste nt \•virh rh e bo,1/_r;, ol,jectiv~.i; .ind poli cie s ,uni/or
,1r1y o the r ordinan ce, law o r re qu ireme!II oi the City .
Th e pr ~1~osed PU D Site Plan present ed 1s in co11 fom1a11 ,e wilh all olh e, o rdin.rn ces,
l.1w s ,_111d lt:!Ltll iie11 :l.:!11b ul tl1 1;.• C ity.
ATTACHMEN[S:
1:,hibit A: Oxford S1a 1io11 PLJ D Writ1 e 11 St.it e rn e 111
lxhibit G: Oxford ,ta lio n l'ULJ ,·te 1-'lan
Exhibit C: Neighborhoo d ,'vl ee ling Summ ary -Ma,ch 16, 2011
•
•
•
Pbnnmg and Zoning Curru:uss1on
l'ubh c Hc::i:ing
C:t!ir IIUSF.2 012·0(f) !lrcwrry and ttZON ::!0 12-00) Mu1111 Pl:i.swcs J•UD
Aug .1st 7, ..!U I:!
PJ gt. I of 7
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING CO MMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
August 7, 2012
Minules and audio are available al :
http://www.en~le wood2ov .or!U [nd c .~ .aspx ?page= 152
I. C AI I. TO OIHJfR u~:
The regu la r m eet ing o f the Ci ty Pl3n ning and Zoning Commi;sion was ca ll ed to order at
7:01 p.111 in the Cit\ Coun cil Chambers of th e Eng lewood Civ ic Cen ter, Chai r B1 ic k
preS1d in g
Pr ese nt ·
-\bs ent:
Sta if:
Bl eile. Roth, King, Kn oth, Fi sh, Brick, Kint on, Townlev
1-r ce r,,ir~ (.1ltc rn ate )
\•\lelker
,\Ian W hite, Commu nity Deve lo pmen t Direc to 1
Br ook Be ll , Planner II
Aud r a Kirk , Pl anne r I
Na ncy Re id, ;\ssista nt C ity ;\ttornev
II, PUBLIC HfAKIN(j
11@:
CASE #USE2012-009
Conditional Use approval to allow a Nano-Craft Brewery at 3445 S Broadwa)'
Ble ile m ove d
Knoth ,ernncled : I U OPtN I H~ 1-'Ul:l LI C HEARING FO R CA~E #l.l SE:!0 12-U09
AYE S:
NAY S:
Bleile, Ro th , Kno th, Fd,, King. ~r ic <, Ki n ton, Townley
None
ABSTAIN : None
ABSENT : W elker
/v\o li o n car ri ed .
M r . Bell prese nted th e case . He st a,e d th e appl ica nts are seek ing approvJ I oi a Condnio nal
us e l'erm it ilppli ca tion to all ow a nano-cra ft brewery al 3445 S Broadway . Staff
recomm ends that t he Plannrng and Zoni ng Commissio n ap _J ro ve Ca se ijLJSE20 12-009 to
allow a nan o-cr;ift brewery to be loca ted w1t hi· th e MU-B-1 Mixed-Use Ce nt ra l Bu si ness
Z on e D 111·1c 1 at 344 5 S 13roa dw J \' v11 th the l o low in g conditi o ns:
Pl nn :u ng tu 1U Zon 111g Cor111 r.iss 1011
Pub lic Hearit:g
Case UUSl::?012 ·009 Brcwcrv .i.nd ffZO!'-:201 ~ OOS t-.fonm Phuuc~ !':JD
Augu11 7, 201 2 ·
r .1i;c :" nf 'l
1. The 3ppli can l ; ~h;.,11 ob ta in all pc rmils and requ ir ed li censes p ri o r lo comme ncing
uµe, J liOI IS.
2. The appli can l s shall co mply wit h ;ill o l her a;)pli ca b le Federal Sla l e. and lool code s
J . All sa les from Ihe operaron shall be re tail; wh o lesa le di str ibu tion sha ll ne t be permill ed
4. All ou l 5id e seat ing s'1a ll co mply with Pu blic Wo rks D epar tm en t requir ern enr, fo r
ou 1d uor seaw,g and u se o i the pu blic righI-ofway .
5 A ny ou:sid e smoking ar e a m ust m eet the n1i111rnu rn require rH:nt s for th e Colorado
Clea n Ai r :\c t.
6. To lh e m;ixin 11 1m PXIPnl . l hP ,1rr li c,1nl ~ha'! ra ke al l po ss ihle p reca 11rio n< and m<>a <rrrP<
10 co 11I ro l od o rs p ro du ced by th e ope ralion .
7. Ap p ro va l o f Co nditio nal Use Perrni 1 does not cons t,tute approval o f app li ca nt's
co ncep lu al si t e o r fl oc r pla n attached to app lica l ion. For ma l app ro va l of sIIc or bui lci ing
i~1p rove111e nI s sha ll be bas ed on plans and d o cum en ts :equired fo r Bu il ding. Acc ess ory,
o r other assoc iated Permits .
8. Production of beer shall be limited to ~ .. ~oo barrel , or 74,400 ga ll ons p er yea r from th e
<.l al e µrod ucti o11 stan s. The applicar.I shal l ma·nt ai n a log of the bee r p 1oduc11 on Jnd
mak e it ava ilab le to the City upon req uest.
'J . Th e Cil y M anage r or designee sh all r eview the Co ,1ditio 11a l U se 0 11 an annu al basi s fo r
complian ce w ;It, all te rms of approva l of th e Co ndi tiona l Us e Permit .
a. If the Co:1diti ona l U se is found 10 b e in co mp lian ce w rth the term s of the
Co 11 d iIional Use Pe rm it, lhe permit ~hall be re newed fo r one (1) y eJr.
u. If J ,e Cu rditiurr ,rl U,e ,, 11 0 lo n1;er op eratin g, Ih e Cond it ional U se Perrn i1 sh all be
voi d ed a11d noti ce shall be reco rd ed w ith lh e offi ce o f Ihc A rapa hoe Co unlv Cle rk
;111rl R PrnrdPr .
c If th e C or.ditional Use is fo un d 110 1 l o be in m rn pl iance w rlh I he l erm s of lhe
Co nd itio n al Use Permi t, Ih e Condrt ,o nal Us e shall b e subJec t to enfo rce ment ac tr or s
pursuant to the Eng lew o o d M u nici pal Code
i~l
Applicant Tes timony
t\ii r Pr1 11I WPhi:.tPr, th P ,1pplicr1 ni. w r1s swa m in . H e sl c:1tf::'d Enelewood 11 e('d-. i:.nm P1h ing, t:1
bring rt 10 li fe aga in. Tris is a grea t loca l ion, righ t dow111 o wn . H ope iull y, w~ are go ,n g ro
d raw o t her business es to th e Cny .. -\fter talkin g w rth a nu mber o f res idents Englewood
needs a nice es tab li shm ent to go to that they ca n enj ov. We wi ll remain sma ll; "·e don 't
•
•
have 1h e des ir e to grow to o large. We w ill al5 o be a cofiec sho p so p co i:,l e who do n'I d·ink •
I.,~,., c,trr u >111e lrd ve coffee and l ea. l'ropus ed hours ar e 7 am co 9 pm Su11d<1 y tl rru ,;gl ,
•
•
•
l');.111111 1~ ,11,J 'i'.u1u11t; Cu11ur.1 ~~1u 11
Pulli e tl e:m n~
(a\C #USt::2012-00IJ Urewrry :md IIZO N20l 2·00~ Ma nin P\a51 1cs PUO
/\u guM 7, 201 :!
Pe;c 3 of 7
Th u rs:l ay and 7 am to 10 or 11 pm 0 11 Friday ond Saturday. Customer s will b e ab le to b uy a
64 ou nc e jug to rem ove fr o,:, the prenmes . Th at will be the only package that w ill be
dll ow ed to leav e tli e prope It y <1 1u.J tli<1t is acceptJble in th e StJt e li ceme. Tl,e plan is tu
opPn th P so 11th sirle nf thr, bu ildin!J and put a patio out th ere if app rove d by th e Cit y He
stated h e ha; bee n b rew ing for 24 yea rs . Th ere w ill be so m e rein io rcemen t o f th e b ud ding
needed and he stated they hope to exp and int o the w ho le building in tim e.
I.Gll
Public Te slimon\'
M r Pd ul i-{ouck was swo rn in . He stated he is a part ner in t1 e busi ness .
M r. Kinton ,isk e.d how far into the. sirlP wa lk th? patin w ill P,tPnd M r . Hnu ,k sairl
app roxifllately six fee l Th at leaves appr \im ately six fee l fo r ped es trians .
C h;i ir Or ic k asked if th ere wa5 a nyo ne e ls e vvho w ished to sp eak 1egc.:1din g this c. .. 1se . T1 e re
vvas 110 one.
tl@i
Fi sh mo ve d :
Bleile seconded : TO CLOS E THE PUB IC HEAR ING FOR Ct\SE #USE201 2-009
A"ES :
N/\\'S :
Bl eil e, Ro th , Knoth , Fish , King, Br ic k, Kini o n. Townl ey
,"<one
ABST:\IN: None
ABSEN T: Welker
Mo tion ca rri ed .
Discussion Poi nts :
1. Liqu o, license 1equi1 t:d il11 ougl1 S telle, 11 0 1 C it)1 •
2. \.onrl 1tic111 r1 I Uc;e r£:lg ubtio ns fnr rPnPw;,I .
3 . W hat produ cts w ill be all owed to leav e th e p ,ern ise sl
4 . Sidewa lk pat io
5 R~i11furu.~111 e1 1t uf Uui ldi ng lu ._u..c o 11u11 u dc1t e u~e .
ft VV dl hf' ;i rnffr->P c.h np .-1l,1 ne wi th th e n.1n r.-cr<1 ft br r~\.very
7. G rea t add iti on to Cit y; go od fit for downt own.
8 . Tr,1ff ic not an is sue .-
.t,i:er d1 scussiu n the f0 Howi!·1g mo tio n w as mJd e :
Pl:m :u ni; :ind Zo ning Comr.u ss 1on
Pcb l1c lle:tnt.g
ClSr #USE:?01'2-009 Brtwtry and l=ZON20 l2-00S Mru1m Pl~t1c s PUD
A11e11s17 . 20:1
P;t ct• 4 t1 f1
i~I
Kn oth moved:
Bl eile seco ndec:
1.~l
THAT C.ASE #USE201 2-009, CON DITIONAi. USE BE APPROVED
TO AL LOW A NANO-CR4H BREWER\' TO BE LOCA TED
WITH IN TH E ,ly /LJ-8-1 MIXED-USE CENTRAL 13(.;5/N ESS DISTRICT
A'/ 3 445 5 IJl<OAVWA\' AS ?RESEl✓TED WITH CONDITIONS.
,WES:
NAYS :
Bl eile, Ro th, Kno th, Fi;h, King, Br ick , l :inlon, Townley
None
ABSTA IN : N o ,,:-
A£35[NT : Welke ,
l\•\0lI on earn ed .
T'1e Commission w ished the ap::,lican l good luck wi 1'1 the 11,1110-b,ew e,y.
:~;
CA SEII ZON 20 12-0 05
Re zo nin g of 1366 W O don.I Ave nu e (MJrtin Pl ,1>l ic,) tu J PU D lu all ow rcs id cnli il l use.
Ro l h m ov,,rl :
Knoth seconded: TO OP cN TH[ l'U □LIC I ![ARI NG fOR CASE 'IZON2012-00~
A YES :
:S:1'.YS:
1\BSTAlr-l ·
ABSENT :
Ble il e, Roth, Kn :-i l h, foh. King,. Brick, Kin to n, Tnwn lP\'
Non e
None
Welke r
1\-,otio n carr :~d.
I\ \s Kirk prrsP,'I H I lh P .a<P . ThP app lic.111t subm itted ai, Jpp li cat ion to rez on~ 1366 V\lc:>st
O>-iorcl 1\vcnue from 1-1 (L,ght I1:dustrial) to a PUO (Planned U ni t D evdop m enl) to allow
resid e11t1a l LIS ·'!. Th e Reco rding Secre tary :J1s •.rib u ted a new copy ot the lands ca;1e plan for
t he propert y . The ap pli cant is proposing 10 hu il rl 2 ;2 for-lP;1SP arar1111 P11t s Th <> pro jrcl ·.v iii
ev 115i51 of r · .e build ing wit h a dr ive thru w i l h apar tmec ts ab ov e to co nnect the two side s.
The si te ., 3.50 4 acres and wi :I include parki ng, a p'.)ol and recre,,tion ;;r EJ . 335 ,)arking
spa ce s .v iii !:le provid ed . Ac cEs s l o th e site fro m the li ght rail sl Jti o n was d isc us;ed.
•
•
•
•
•
•
l'·:uming :.i1 1c.l Zuni nt Cumnm~ion
Pub li c t-k a:11\f
Case hUSF.201 :-009 Brewery and lfZON2012 ·005 Mutm ?last1 cs PU D
A11 c11~1 7, 201 2
P:1 fe 5 of 7
li?Jil
Applicant Testimony
Mr. Jonathan Bush . Prin cipal of Littl eton Capi tal Partners, was swo r•1 ii,. Th e propert y was
pur cl 1,ts eJ 111 Fd;rU,il '✓ ul 20 11 d i n.I wurk begd 11 u11 th e pr ujeLI . Tl1 e p1 ujecl as p rese nted rs
pnrnari lv res iden tial ; commerciai la vo ut did not \'to rk .
Mr. Tin, Sch lighting of Little ton Cap ita l Partner s was swor· ,n . H e di scu sse d parking for the
project .
M r Joseph Po l, o i H umphri es/Poli Architects was sworn in . He presented a i lid~ <hnw n f
th e proposed development and answe red qu es tio ns from th e Commissio n. The p roj ec t wi ll
be nam ed Oxford Station . He stated th e intent is lo ha ve the project o ut o f th e ground next
ye ar Item s discus se d 111clu ded a pedeslri.1n bridge ac ross Oxford ,,venue, d rainage,
interse ct ion improvements at Oxford /\ven ue and Nava jo St reet, pub lic ut, i iz c o f uni l5,
ren tal r2 tes, snow sto rag e and bic ~1cl e access .
Public Testimony
Ch,ur Bdck ask ed if th er e was anvone w ho wis hed to speak rega rding thi s case . Th ere was
no 011e .
!Ell
Fi sh moved:
Kn o th se.co nd erl : TO n OS F THF Pl J6 1 IC: HEARI NG FOR CASE !;ZON2012-005
AY ES :
N,\YS:
Bleile , Roth, l<nolh, Fish , King, Bri ck, Kinto n, Townl ey
Nore
A BSTA IN:
l'.BSENT :
.\l o r·c
Welker
Motio n car .-ied .
Discussion Points:
I . Need fo r " pedest ria n b ri dge ove r Oxfo rd .
Pub lic access in gen er al.
PJr hirr g wi ll l;e l rd11d l~J tln u u gh <1LLe>S c,11J ,.
-. l.i1 11d scap ing will be abo ·,•e Cit y requ iremen ts.
PUD neve r expires.
G. Po 0.s ibi lity of he ig ht res 1ri c t1 o n.
e.
9 .
10 .
C'ty of She ri d,,n 's corn111 ents we re taken ,111 0 ac cou 11 t.
1'i11H:~ fr.mu:, ~liuul J L1e uut uf th e gruumJ 11 e:xt year.
A Trafii c Stu dy was d o ne, b ut V✓as no t pres ented to th e Co rmnrss ion
l·roj ec t is prirnarilv re sid enlial; w 111 m c rc i,1l layo ut d ,d r-o t wo rk .
Pl:um in,s and Zo nmg Co nurn rno n
Pubh c Hcarmg
ClSe ttCSE:?U 12-UOlJ U1cw ery :!nd #ZON "2.0 12 ·005 M;u u I l'la!.l1 c ~ l'UD
Augu~1 7. 20 12
t':t !;C 6 Of 7
11 On-si1e amen iti es i nclude pool, co mmo n roo m an d p ubl ic arl
12. Proj ect wi ll i11 LilllJe 1 and 2 l:;ed ro om fo r-reit uni ts.
13. Creal u sP. for si l e.
14 . Drai;1 age and snow stor ag e.
15. Navaj o St and Oxford Ave sl ree l improvement s.
I b. Lo ca lion o f en lry l o project was moved for safely rc·aso n s.
17. Po ssib il i;y of sav ing o ld b ui ld ·ng 11 0 1 feasi bl e.
Aft er disc u ss ion and a frie 11 d ly <11 11e nclrn enl l,y Mr. Ru lli a,ki11g i,11 <-100 fuu: lidgl,t linii l
and acce pted by Mr. Kno lh th e fo ll owin g mo tio n was ma de:
1l?Jll
Kn n rh move d:
Ro th seco nU eG: TH AT CASE #ZON20 12-005 REZON/,'JG OF 13 (,6 WES T
O XFORD AVE NUE FROM /-/ (I.I Cl-!T IN DUSTW AI.) ro A PUO
{PI.A N NED UNIT O£\IELOPMEN )) 70 Al.I.OW RES/OF.NT/A/.
USES BE RE COMMEN DE D FOR APPROVAi. TO CI TY COUNCiL
WIT/-/ '/I-IE FOLLOWING CONDITION.·
1. ·Vlaximum heighc !imi1 10 be 100 fe~c.
/\Y ES ·
NA,Y~:
,\BSTAIN:
t\B SENT:
Ble ile, Ro1h , Kno t h, r ish, King , 13r-ck, Kinion, Townley
None
/..Jone
Welker
Motion ca rri ed .
Th e Commission fell lhal 1h e projec t is J good iii for th e p rop erty and sup porl s Roachn.ip
En gle-.voo d: 2003 Eng lewood Co mprehens ,ve PIJn.
Ill. PUl!LIC FORUM
l~l
·\ngie H t !ll t and Rv an '.Mh ite di scusse d .1 llowi ng mi cro di ~till er ies in 1:·1e C ii"y' o f E·1glewood .
rhey sl at ed their firsl ch o ice o f lo calio ns fo r 1h eic b~si ness is Ihe C ry of Eng lewood, but
cli slillPriP< arP nnl all 0\vr1 rl They as ked ii Ih,I c,11 be c~anged Bo th L11tle :0 ·1 or,d 1.;•k e w ood
all ow d istill eri es in approp,ia'el y zoned are.i s.
D ire ctor W h ile ~late d l he p:·chib ,Iion of d i,1d lcr ic'.-i n En glewood wa; pul 'n:u lhc Code 111
I %3 and ma ybe it is 1,m e to look 11110 add ress ing th e iss u e. He su gge sted lh e sub1e c 1 be
discu ssed at lh e Se plember S''' ;1 udy sessio n. M s. H unl and /v\r. W hile we ce in viled lo
dlle11tl 1I,e Se p l e111utr S'' 111eeli11g.
•
•
•
•
•
•
PIJ nni ng 1:ml Zonin g Co mmiss ion
l'u hh c llc::i nn c
Case PUSE20 12-009 Hr.:wery :md '12 0 N2012 -~ll j ~l art m Pla ~nr• PUD
Au~UH 7,20 1£
~age 7 of 7
IV . ATrORNEY'S CHOICE
ii?lli
/J\s . Rei d n o ted w hen the discus sion of tra ff ic iss ues o n Oxfortl and N ava jo is aga111
discuss ed to please re men,ber in or der to chang e the tr affi c patt ern and/or a nyth ing about
tha t intersec ti on 'N e ha ve 1, d 0 al w ith tw o rail roa d s, RTD , CDOT, Ci tv oi Sher idan ~11d City
of E11gl cwood.
V. STAFF 'S CHOICE
l@i
Di rector White sta ted Staif woul d like to move the Aug ust 1 1" m ee I 111r to Au gus t 28~. Th e
Cr ai g Hospi tal vaca t.o n u f the Clark so n :;I ,ee l ri ght-o f--.,·ay wi ll be di scusse d
M r. Bleile moved and Mr. Fish seconded ta move the meeting :o th e 28'" Motion p a:;se d
VI. COMMISSIONER'S CHOICE
ti?])
Mr . BI PilP. .1p olo gi1P d inr nn: he1 ng ~hlP tn .1tl Pnrl th P ;111 1111 ;1 1 Hn~rd_ l ,rnmi ,.:.inn ;inr!
l\uthorit1• A pprec iati o n Night JI Prra te'; Cove.
1,-lr. Knoth no ted the City's industria l d 1s tn cI is w he r e wP are go111 g to ge l o ur d ens i ty and
deve lopers w :1I be ask in g for i1eight I equ es l s hig he r than w hat peop:e 10 the east wan t l o
,pp \/\/,-. n eP d tn (i c11 re nut \-v hat we ar e eoin g to do .
M r . Bri ck asked D irector White w hen the P:annin g and Zo ~ing Corn mi~s ion w ou ld be
d1sCJss111g the sl 2tion ar ea p :ans. H e stat ed th ere is a publi c mee I111g o n Aug us t ti ''· al 7:UU
in I lampderi i lal'. The Co mmi ssion w ill be ask e d to ,,dopl this as a sma ll area plan in the
futu re. He noted Mr. Roth an d M r. Knoth have ag reed to serve o n th~ stee rin g committ ee
and th e Co mm iss io n ca n l ook to them fo r upda tes . Th e co nsult a nt s are l o b e fin 'sh ed the
first part of 20 13 .
1\1\1. Ki11 to11 L'J l1 1..un ~d vv illi J\·\r . K11 u l '1 '~ Lu 1111 11 e11b . Tlt t: Com 111 b!:i i01 1 need~ l u .iddr e~:>
heigh t, pe des tri an conn ec tiv it y and the cc-.Hex l o f thi ngs.
The 1r1 ec l 1ng adjcu rne d at 10 :05 p.m
• CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
IN THE MATIER OF CASE HZON2012-005
FINDINGS Of FACT, CONCLUSIONS
:\NO RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE
REZONING OF I 366 WEST OXFORD AVE
f'WM 1-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) ro A PUD
(PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) TO
ALLOW RESIDENTIAL USES
INITIATED BY :
LCP Oxford LLC
_;711 South Nevada Street
Littleton , Colorado 80120
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS Of THE
Cln' PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION
Co mrrn ss io n lV1e mbers Pr es ent: Bri ck, Fi sh, Knoth, Ro th , Kin g, Bleile, Kin io n, Tmvn ley
Fre emire (a lt ema1e)
Co mmi ssion Members Absenl:
• Tris matte r was hea rd before e Ci ty f'lanrnng an d Zoning Commission on ,\ugu st 7,
2012, in the Ci ty Coun c il Chambers of the Eng lewood Ci v ic Cen te r,
•
TesIiniony w a~ rece iv ed from Staif, th e applicant and the public. The Corrnn i;s io n re ce iv~d
11 o tt :e of PuUlic H~diiri g, Ce 1tifiL .:1t iu11 uf Posti11g1 d11 d S1t1ff Re _:.,u,I fru111 Stdff wlii d1 wen:
incorpo rated into and made a part of th e rf'c.o rn of thf' Publ :c: 1-if'aring
Af ter cons ideri ng stat ement s of th e wilnesse s, an d rev iewing tile pertin e nt cloc um e11 Is, the
member~ of th e Cit y Pl.1r.ning iill d Z on i:1g Commission m ade the followin g Findin6S ~nd
Co nclu sion s.
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. Tt-lAT th e applica ti on was ,il ed by LCP Oxford LI.C se ek ing approval to rezone 13 66
\Ves t Ox fo rd Ave nu e fr om 1-1 {Lig ht In du str ia l ) to PL D {Pl ar-ne d Un it Developmen t)
t:, al :ow res ide nti al uses.
·l . THAT Pubiic No ti c e of the Pu bl ic Hea ring wa s giv·en by publica ti on in t•1e
Engle wood Hera ld on Ju lv 20 , 20 1 2 and wa s on th e Lil y's web;i te from l u ly l 2,
,0 12 thr o ugh Augu ;t 7, 20 12.
J . THAf th e pco p Pr ty w as po sted as req uired, said pos:ing set,in g fo rth th e d ate, ti1n e,
and Jiace o f th e Publ ic HeMing.
4. THAT pur su,1 1 1 10 1he Pla nned Unit DE:,elopme nl ::i rocecu re. a pre-;ippli ca:ion
mee tin8 was he ld \\'i th Staff in lale 20 1 I and a forrn al subn-.,tta l ma de lo th e City
The applic a1ion wa ; reviewed by City Departmen ts and 01he, affected ou l side
agencies.
S . THAT pursuant 10 the Pl anni>d Unil Oe velor,mi>ct procedure. the appl i,an l
conducted a ne igh borhood meeting on f,.•la rc h I , 20 i 2.
6. THAT notice of lh e neighborhood mee lin g was mail ed lo propert·,• owners ,,nd
occ upan ts of p,n perl y w ithin 1 000 fee: of th e sile.
7. THJ\l !lite fi11<1l Oxfu:J Sid l iu11 ruo P"~'"' W d > ,ul,11 ,ill.eJ U II Ju'y 6, 2012.
R. THAT he ap plica,1 1 is p roposing l u builc1 25 2 for-leas e ,11:ar 1rncn1 , w ith par kin g, a
µool and a ,ecrea ti on area .
9. THAT the applicant is proposing 3 3 5 park ,ng space s.
9. THAT P/.1nn Pr Ki rk IP\lifu:ori Ih~ rP ,111ru-f i~ fnr rlw 1P7nrn ng nf 1 '{0h \,v , ... ,I nx rrnd
Avenue from 1-1 ilight indu strial) to a PUD (P lanned li'1it D evelo pment) 10 aliO'.v
lt'!:>iUc11iial use::.. t.-h . Ki1k lt!:i l :fied to th e cri teria the Co11r 11i !:>s10 11 mus t t u,1~1U~r
when reviewing a l'U U appli czlion Ms. Kirk lurlher tes tifi ed l1 1a t Stall reco mme,ids
approval o f the ameo dment.
10. TI-IAT the Oxfo,d SlJlio 11 Pldn .u:'.U U11il Ot:'velup11 1~1 11 is 11 1 1.:.onio 1t"n,rn ce with
Roadmap Engl ew ood : 2003 Eng lewood Comprehensive ~Ian .
CONCLUSIONS
I. THAT !h e ap plicali on was fil ed by LCP Oxford LI.C. s~eki ng app ,ova l to rezon e
1366 W es t Oxford A,·,s n,r p frnrn 1-1 (ligh t inrlirslri al) In ,l Pl JO (Pl an 11 Pd I Jnil
D e ·1e loprnen t1 to :illo\v res identi.:il llSe!;,
l. I HAT proper no 1,i 1ca 11 o n of !h e date, tim e, and place of th e ~ubl,c H Ea, g wa;
given by 1lubhc a1ion in !h e officia l Citv ne•.vspaper, pos tin g o n the Ci l y's \\'ebsi l e .11 d
by pos ting of thi:-prop ~ny fo r 1i1e required length of tim e
3. THAT all tes tim ony received from staff members, th e app licant and th e ~~b li c 11.,s
bee n mace part of lh e record of th e Pub lic H eari n~.
4. THAT the requ es t meels th e :rite,ia for a r uo.
5. THAT th e PUQ 1s a po silive in1p rovem ent for the prope rty and is lh e be!I use fo r th e
si te
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
6. THAT th e propose d Planned Unit Devekprn en l is in con forman ce ,·,,111 Roadnnp
Eng lewood: 2003 En gl ewood Comprei-,.::ns ivc, Pl.in .
DECISION
THEREFORE , i i is th e decis ion oi th e City Planning J nd Zonin g Com mi ss ion tha t lhe
ap p lica tio n ii led by I.CP Oxford LL C fo r the rezonin g of I 36f W es t Ox ford fro,·, 1· 1 (l i ght
in dus tr irl l) to a PUD (P,.i 1111 e,J Unit Devdui;111 e11I ) 10 all ow res icle11 11a l uses be
reco mmended to Cit\' Co unc il for approval.
The deosio n w as reached up on a vote on a mo II 011 ma de at th e mee ting of lh~ City
Flan ning anrl 7.nning Cnm111 isc.inn nn A11g 111;f 7, ~01 7, by Mr . Kn oth , s+c>co nd t?d by i\'\r Roth,
whicn mo tion Slil les
ti.YES :
NAY,·
ABSTA IN:
1\!lScN r,
CA SE #ZON2012-005, REZONIN G OF 1366 WEST OXFORD
AVT:NUE FRO ,\! I-I /1 IC HT INOUS'RIAL) TO I\ PUO (PL A"-INW
UN il UtVcLUl'McN I ; /() !\I.I.OW RE SIOENT!A / us~s BE
RECOMMENDED FOR APPRO\IA L TO CITY COUNCIL WITH
Tl-IE FO LL OWING CON /Jrl/ON:
Mr1:-.·,n,11m hF"ieh t lirr.1t to be 10 G (eel
King, Kno lh, Ro th , Bleil e, Fish, Tmvnley, K1nIc-n, bri ck
None
None
Welker
Th e mo ti o n ca rrie d.
The s~ Findin gs ,1 nd Concl usiuns Me effect ive as o f lhe meeti ng on A ugust 7, 201 c.
/
. : ~•aONG & WMNG COMMOSSOON
oh n 13r ick, C 1ni r
3
I
Th e rec ordi ng sec retu y co n ducted " pu ll oi 9 Plannin g and Zon ing Co m mi ss ion •
111 embers \'ia e-m ai l to r th e ap p1 ova l o f th e Au gus t 7, 20 12 M inutes and the F111 d111 gs
o f F;ict in Case #U SU Ol 2-00 9, Co nd,t,o nal Use i o r J nano ·c raft b1cwc·y loc,11d
wi thi n a \.1U·Cl ·l lv\i xc d-Us e Ce 11t1 JI Bu si11 ess D ist ri ct at 3445 S B·o 3cwa\• and Ca,e
t.ZO N 2U l 2·005, rezo nin g o l 136 6 We st O xford Av enue fr o m 1-1 (Ligh t l nd u1tna l) te-
a PUD (Pla n ned Unit D evelcpm ent) to all ow res id ent ia l uses
l h e A ugust 7, 20 I 2 Minutes were app rov ed.
AYE S
NAYE ~:
AllSEN T
1\BSTAIN .
Ru tli , Blic k, K11u tli , fol,, Kin g, Ki nton. Townl ey, Ble le
None
No ne
W ~lker
ThP Find ings o i Fac t in C as e //U SE1 01 :-00 9 w ra re 2p prove d .
AYES :
N AY ES
,<>,BSl:NT :
A 8 51 A l i'-:
Ro th, l)nck, Kn o th , hs h, Ki ng, Ki nt on, To w nl ey, lll e'le
r✓rm n
No ne
Welk er
The Fin d in gs oi Fac t in Case II ZO N2 0 I2-005 were approvc J .
,\Y ES:
NAY ES:
A BSEt-l T:
t\BST,'1 I1'-:
Ro th. Bric k, Kno th, r ish, Ki ng, Ki nto n, Tn w nlPy, HIP IP
None
N one
\'Ve lk er
•
•
•
•
•
FELSBURG
H OLT &
ULLEVIG
August 20, 201:1
Mr . Steve Kurtz
Llltleton Capilal Partners. LLC
5711 South Nevada Street
Liltleto n, CO 80120-4615
Re : OKford Station Traffic Impact Analysis -Response to City of E,.;1 ,1lewnod Comments
FHU Reference No . 12-045-01
Dear Mr . Kunz:
This letter serves to provide responses and explanalions to the City of Englewo od Genernl and
Spec,fic comments on the Traffic Impact Study tha t was prepared by Felsburg Holt & Ulitlvig dated
Jul y 5, 2012 . City review comments are dated July 25, 2012 . This letter In cludes both the City
comment and our response and explanation to that comment. If needed.
City of Englewood~ Comments
Note that parts of this report require additional information in order for staff to issue
compfote comments. Therefore, staff could havo ;;idditlanal comments as TIA is rovls ed.
Response : Comment understood.
2. Staff would not racommend a Windermere mid-block pedestrian crossing at the Oxford
Slalion. The existing conditions (the roadway curve, the hf// and heavy truck traffic) make e
mid•hln r.k crossina IP.ss th;m r/es irnhle Hnw AvAr, ;f lhi!. mr.ommRndalion stays in thA
report, a safery assessment of this ctossing shall be inc'"ded.
Response: A mid -block crossing at this location was recommended to address existing crossing
maneuvers currently be ing conductec b\' pedestrians accessing the OKford/City of
St·it!ridan l1ut1l rail sta tion . Huw ~ve r, th is 1111µ1ovt!111tmt is not 1:1ssential to u,a
success of Oxford Station -there are designated crosswa lks at toe Oxford
Avenue/Navajo Street intersection that provide safe crossings for pedestrians . As
su:h , re ference to this improvement will lle removed :ram lhe re'vised traffic study .
3 Slaff noted that one of r ecomme ndations is a possible i,,stallalion ol th e northbound left tu,~
arrow at tno Oxford and Navajo intersection . In that c.ase, a detailor:J trDffic signal
operational analysis will be required for both a 75 second cycle and a 150 second cycle _
(since it is doubtfu l that a left turn signal can be accommodaled with the 75 second cycle).
Also , analysis will be required for Iha 6(J second and 120 second cycles for all OFF poak
hour periods .
(,)CO Sollt h $yrnwsc Wn y, Sll Hl! 60 0 C,•m~1rn 1:il, co 8•)111 1cl ;0,.n 1 .M-tJ fo:-: 303 .72 1.0632
,·.ww.th ut·i,!!.,:n :n info (,i-fhu cng rn m
Mr. Steve Kurtz
Augus• 20, 2012
Paye 2
Response : lnil 'al analyses on this isc.uo ,nolcaled thal the addition of a northbound left lurn
phase would ~ of ben°fil both to Intersection operations and towaros reducing
northbourd ;enicle qu~uing on Navajo Street. More detailed ~nalyses of this
Intersection , and its coordination wilh lhe Santa Fe Boulevard/Oxford Avenue
lnte ·sectlon, v,11 oe undertaken and Iha results will be incorporated into the revisad
traffic study (includ ing the redistrlbutir,n of project traffK: as identified in the response
to~ Comment No. 5).
4. TIie TIA study should include• gar.oral slatoment that ifh,hen congestion at tho
Navajo!Oxfo,.d intors octlon (caused by a,, increase in the background traffic together with
1h11 proposed developmeril tra:fii;) lakes ,otace in the future, the matter would have to b~
addressed at that time .
Response : A statement w ,11 be added to the ,evised traffic study lhat Oxford Station commits to
work with the City of Englewood lo resolve matters at lhis intersection that are a
direct result of traffic i,npacis caused by Odore Stallon.
5. The lor.,-torm so!utior. (or oedestrian access to /he Oxford Station i:; tho pRdestrtan bridge
over Oxford. Tire development should .;t least pruserve the ROW for tho future pedostrinn
nvRrp;:,ss .
Response : Oxford Station commits to res erving ROW for a future pedestrit.in ovarp nss at a
location that is mutually agrc~obl c lo Oxford Station ~nd the Gil\.
City of Englewood Specific Cor,,ments
1. Page 4 -the center of Oxford east of Navajo is marked as a dual tefl tum tane o: TWL /'L
(not as a meaIanJ.
Response : Text on page 4 vAII be revised to clarify the uses of the center of Oxford Avenue .
2. Page 6 -change illegal crossing statement to aossing without a aosswa!k (unmar/ced
crosswalk).
Response : This 1ext will be revist.d in the traffic study .
3. Pago 8111 -on pogo 8 is stated that Navajo/Oxford northbound left turn problems du rir.g
tho PM peak hours aro often caused by westbound queues from the Santa Fsl Oxford
intersectio n. On page 11 is al:,;u nuted thal the nur{hbou,,d left turn ~ignaf at NovajulOxfu.rr.J
will salvo /Ire le// turn problem al this tntersoctlon. These statamenrs seem to be in conn,cr.
Response: The detailed traffic signal analysis previously noted in~ Comment No . 3 will
be used to clarify this issue .
4. Page 13 -assumption of 30 % decrease in lrio genara:ion due to TOD is probably too hign:
20% wo uld .c:eP.m more reasonable . Howeve r, a change frnm 30¾ to 20% presents an
insignificant change in the :rips
Response · Comment noted; no changes will be undertaken in the revised traffic study,
however, given thP. neg ligible change ir vehicle-trips that would result .
•
•
•
•
•
•
Mr . Sieve Kunz
August 20, 2012
Page 3
5. Paga 14 -Distributio n to Iha north and east seams too small, and tow ards Santa Fa too
high. Staff would suggest to consider the to/lowing distribution :
10% north on Windermere
10% east on Oxford
10% south on Navajo
35% north on Santa F~
30% south on Santa Fa
5½ west on Oxford
Response : The revised Traffic Impact Analysis will incorporate these re visions .
If you have any questions regarding the information contained in the letter , please do not hesitate
l e call.
Respectfully ,
FELSBlJRG ~QLT & ULLEVIG
Richard R. Follmer , PE, PTOE
Associate
•
•
•
OXFORD ST A TION
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
l'rt'pared for:
Littleton Capital Partners , LLC
5711 South Nevada Street
Littleton, CO 80120-4615
303/797-9 119
Proiect Manager:
Mr. Steve Kurtz
l're1•nred /Jy:
Felsburg Holt & Ullevig
6300 S. Syracuse Way, Suite 600
Centennial, CO 80111
303/721-1440
Project Manager:
Ric1ard R . Fol lme r, PE , PTOE
July 5, 20 12
Revised August 29, 20 12
FHU Referen ce No . 12-045
Oxfonl Station Traffic l111p11ct A1111/ysis
TABLE OF CONTENTS
~
I. INTRODUCTION-••-··-·--·--·--·-·····-·······-·········--····---·-·····-·-···-·-·--····---·-··-·•-1
1.1 Project Desc rip tion•·•·--·-·············-··-········-·····-························--··-······· 1
1.2 Sludy Area Bound~r,---····-·········-·-··-·-···---·-·--··--·--··-············--·••· .. ·· 1
II . SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS··-·-----------••4
11.1 Existing Rnanways ••··--··---·-······-·-·······--·--····--·····--·-.. •· ............. _ ....... 4
II 2 Existing Traffic Vo lumes•·-·-····••· .. •· ........................ •-····· .... •··--····--.... 5
11.2 .1 Pede st rian Volume • OxforC: Avenue /Navajo Street/W inderm ere Street
lntcrsoction• .. ···-···-········-··-··-····--·-··-······-·-·--····-·····--·····-·-·····6
11.3 Operationa l Analyses of Existing Conditions •····-·-···-······-········ .. ·-····· .. ····-· 8
Ill. PROJECTED BACKGROUND CONDITIONS•············-·-····-··-·········-···-·········-·9
111.1 Year 2014 Background Traffic. Projecti ons•'-····-····-·········-······ ................ g
111 .2 Ope rational Analys es of Yea r 20 14 Background Conditions••····--··-···-.. ····· .. -9
IV. PROJECTED BUILD·OUT CONDtTIONS ••-··········-·-·····-·······----······ 12
V .
IV . I Oxford Station Development Characteristics•·······-··················· .. ···-········ 12
IV.2 Tnp Generation Estimates •····-··-·-···-···-·····-····-················--·-·····-······ .. 12
IV .£.1 Transit Allcwance •--·--·····-··--··-······--·--·-······-·····-··-·-···-······-··· 12
IV 3 Site•Generated Traffic Volumes and Trip Distributi on•·······-········--··--········ 14
IV . 4 Total Traffic Volumes •···-·--·-··---···-········•··················-········-··-·····--········ 14
IV.5 Traffic Signalizalion Warrant Analysis -Navajo StreeUOICfnrd Station
Access Intersection•··················-········-·-···············•············• ........... _._ 14
IV.6 Deceleration Lane Requiremenls••··-·······-············-····-·········-····-·····-·-·-17
IV.7 Operational Analyses of Build-Out (Yea r 2014) Condilions ••-··•-···· .. -·-·-···· .. 17
IV.8 PedP.strian Sa fety Issues -OICford Light Rail St at,on Access ........ -• .. ······-·· 18
IV.8 .1 Srte Observations •-··· .. ····· ................... ·-·-••········--········--······-· 10
IV.8 .2 Pedestrian Safety Rec ommendations •········-·········-····-·--········-····· 19
IV.9 Infrastructure for Build-Out (Year 2014) Conditions-·-··········-·-··-··----····-·-20
SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS··-·····----·--···-·····-·-··•••··-·-·······-··-··-···-21
LIST OF Al'PENOICES
APPENDIX A EXI STING TRAFF IC COUNT DATA
APPENDI X B LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR STOP CONTROLLED AND
SIGNALIZED IN TERSECTIONS
APPENDI X C TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS -EXISTING CONDITION S
APPENDIX D TRAFFIC Al~AL YSIS WORl<SHEETS -BA CKG ROUND CONDITIONS
APPENDI X E TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS -WARRANT 3 . PEAK HOUR
APPENDI X F TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS -BUILD·O UT CONDI flON!::i
•r~ FEl.51:\URG 'I HOLT &
U LI.F.V I G
•
•
•
•
•
•
Oxford St11tio11 Traffi c /111pact A11alysis
LIST 01' FIGURES
Figure 1 .
Figure 2 .
Figure 3.
Figure 4 .
Figure 5 .
F:gure 6.
Figure 7 .
Fig ure 8 .
Figura 9.
Figura 10 .
~
Vicinity Map---· •--•---· -----·---···-···· •·· •·····•--·---·---------·--------------------------·-2
Oxford Station Silo Plan ---··------------··----·------·----·---·------------------------··· 3
E•isling Roadwoy Characterislics------------------·--·--·--·-----·-·--··-··-·--------·-5
E•isting Veh icle & Pedestrian Volumes---·--------·----·----·----------·---------------·-7
Existing Intersection Geometry & Levels of Service ------·---·---·----·-------··------7
Yeor 2014 Background Traffic Volumes-------·----·-------·-·------------------·--------10
Year 2014 Background Intersection Geometry & Levels of Service -------·--------10
Sile-Generated Traffic Volumes ---·-------·--------------·----·---------------------------15
Year 2014 Build•Out Traffic Volumes--·--·------------------·-------------·--------·--16
Yeor 2014 Build•Out Intersec tion Geometry & Leve ls of Se:1 v1~t,·----·----·--------16
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Estimates of Oxford Slalion Trip Generation -
From Trip Generaricn by the lnslilule of Transportation Engineers----------------13
Taul~ 2 . Infrastructure Requirements lor Bu1ld-Oul {Year 2014) ConditionS -····-·------·---20
• FELSlll'RO :ifi H O LT ,<.. I U f.L EV I G
O~ford Station ·rraffic Impact 1\11(1/ysis
I. INTRODUCTION
/.1 Prujei:t Descri11tiu11
A new ap;,rtmen1 complex, Oxford S1a1ion . is being proposed on a parcel of land in 1he
sou1hwes1 corn er of 1ho Oxford /\vonuo/Navajo S1re etNVindermere St reet intersection in the City
of Englewood . The proJect site is lJoun ded by Oxford Avenue on the north , by Navajo S1 reet on
the east, by Regional Transportat ion District and Burlington Northern & San1a Fe Railway tracks
on 1he west, and by an industrial pa rcel to the south . The Oxford Station si1e was once
occupied by 1he Martin Plastics Converters business , but ii is curre ntly va cant . Sea Figure 1 for
a representa1 1on of tho project location.
Oxford Station Is a proposed 25U unit apartment complex 1hal will als o include lobby and
common areas , while a pool plaza is proposed as an amenity for apartmen11en;,nts . Oxford
Station pla ns In 11tili,e its location near the Oxford/City of Sheridan light rail station as a
marketing point for tho project; one tho! will a11rar.t apartment tenants that desire to uso light rail
for typical commuter and recreational lrips. Proximity to lhe light rail station will redu ce the
impact of new vehrcle-trrps by havin9 rail transrt access wi1hin walking dis1ance.
A single point of access is prnposed on Nav,•jo Street towards the southern boundary of the
proje ct frontage. Please see Flguro 2 for o rcprese ntotion of the proj ec l si1e plan , building
orienla1i o ns , and the proposed ac cess point.
T his analysis provides information related to the traffic impacts for th e pro pose d apartment
compleK and ii provides sper.ific infnrm~lion on·
• Exis1 ing functional and operatiun~I condilions
• Projected rn creases in Background traffic volume levels at the B uil d-Out l imeframe for
this project
• Trip generation estima1es for th e proposed apartment complex
• Evaluation of pr oject imµacts
• Summary of analyses and recommendations
1.2 Shufy Area B o 111ulary
Tile rnformatron conta rned in !hrs report focuses on th e transpm1alion impacts and infrastructure
requirements on the surrounding roadNay system adjacenl to th e existing project sitA:
specifi cally along Odord Avenue, and Na vajo and W inderm ere Stree ts.
• FELSll UR G 7i H O LT o-1 U I.I.EVI(;
•
•
•
Union A'lenue
Hampden Avtnue
Oxfora Ave:w e
1...~ PROJECT
SITE
Bellev,ew Avenue
•
•
•
O~:ford Statiou J'mj]'ic lmpact Analysis
II. SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
1/.1 ExisH11g /foadw,1ys
The P.xisti ng ro adway network adjacent to the project site consists or a state highway (United
Stales 85) and othe r r11hlir. streets typi call y under the jurisdiction of the City of Englewood (east
or US 85) or the City of Sheri dan (wesr of US 85). Figure 3 provides a graphical representation
of the main roadways adjacent to the project and it includes roadway laneage, posted speed
limits , and traffic control 1n'. ormat1on. Following is a more detailed description of these
roadways.
US 85 -This sta te highway is designated as an Expressway by the Colorado Department of
Transportation to the north and sout1 1 of Oxford Avenue. US 65 intersects Oxford Avenue via
an at-grade intersection and this intersection Is controlled by a traffic signal. US 85 has six
lanes for normal vehicle movements with a concrete barrier separation be tween the northbound
and southbounrt directions of trave l. The lanes adjacent to the median oro used os a High
Occupancy Vehicle facility that is restri cted to vehicles with two or more people and for
motorcycles and left turn movements during the AM (northbound) and PM (southbound) peak
hours. The posted speed limit is 55 miles per hour (mph) to the north and south or Oxford
Avenu e.
Oxford Avenue -This avenue provides easVwest access co nt inuity from approximately Lowell
Boulevard eastward thr ough the Cities of Sheridan and Englewood, and into Cherry Hil ls
Village. This street typica lly has lour travel lan es to the west of US es . while two travel lanes
with a two-way left turn lane exist to the east or US 85.
Oxford Avenue is controlled by a traffic signal at th e Navajo Street'Windermere Street
intersection as we ll as at th e River Point Parkway Inte rsection on the west sidP. of US 85. Othe r
traffic signals along Oxford Avenue a re somewhat distant from the pro1ect site . being at the
Fede ral Boulevard (to the west) and Broadway (to the east) intersections. The posted speed
limit is 30 mph ;,long Oxford Avenue to the east of US 85 and 35 mph to the west of US 85.
NavaI0 Streell'N11 11.Jerme re Street -This st reet is named differently to the so uth (Navajo Street)
and to the north (Windermere Street) of Oxford Avenue . Na vajo Street provides continuous
access between Oxford Avenue and Be lleview Avenue (and beyond), primarily serving light
inrl11strial land L1 ses. Windermere Street proceeds northward from Oxford Avenue, merging with
Kenyon Avenue for easU.vest co nn ecti vity . Th is street also provides access to numerous light
industrial land uses. Wir.dermere Street provides th e vehicle access route to the existing
Oxford/City of Sheridan liA hl rai l station and ii includes on-street parki ng fo r transit P"lrons (in
limited areas). Th e posted speed lim it al ong Navajo and Windermere Streets is 30 mph.
_ Intersections _-Publi c stree t inte rsections surrounding the project site have a .va rie ty of la ne
configurations, from single approach lanes. to ones wi th three approach lanes and dual left turn
la nes Inter sections are con trolled by traffic sign;,ls "t th r> Rivm Point Parkway US 85 and
Nava jo Streel1Winden1ere Street intersections along Oxford Avenue .
•r'..il f[LS!l lll\l,
• t-/C,LT ~
U I.Lf:'1 I G
LEGEND
(tJ Number of Tra ve l Lanes
li;j Posled Speed LlmilS
a ~ Traffic Sign al
j
!
i
I
!
•
O>.fo rd Avenue
•
•
•
•
Trnffic Impact A1wlysfr
11.2 £.\"isling Trnffic Vol11111e s
Daily traffic volumes were recorded for 24-hour periods along Oxford Avenue, Navajo Street ,
and Windermere Street adjacent to th e project site and to the Oxfordi City of Sheridan light rail
stat ion . These data collection efforts included recording traffic volume levels on a typical
weekday for a 24-hour period . Daily traffic volume levels on these streets were :
• Oxford Avenue =
Street
17 ,825 vehicles per day (vpd)(west of Navajo Street/Windermere
• Navajo Street = 7,175 vpd
• Windermere Street = 5,735 vpd
Intersection turning movements were also recorded . Peak hour traffic volumes were recorded
on April 17 , 2C12 during the AM and PM hours of peak commute times to identify the highest
levels of adjacent traffic activity . lntersec1ion turning movements were re:orded at the following
locations ·
• Oxford Avenue/Navajo Stree t/W indermere Street intersection
• Oxford Avenue/US 85 intersection
Figure 4 is a graphical representation at the recorded traffic volumes; the traffic count data can
be found in Appendix A . Tr~ffic volumi, patterns at the US 85/0xford Avenue Intersec tion
represent what can be expected at a major expressway intersection -heavy
northbound/soul11bound volurn e a long US 85. with turning movements to,trom US 85 sometimes
approaching 300 vehicles per hour (vph). Mo.,ements across US RS on Oxford AvP.nue are 450
vph or less during either peak hour.
Eastbound and westbound movements at the Oxford Avenue/Navajo Street/Windermere Street
intersection are 500 vph (westbound dunng the PM peak hour) or less ano have Jatterns on the
side st reets representing movements to/from the north (light rail station) and suulh (employment
opJortunities) and oriented primarily to/from US 85.
11 .2.1 Pedestriiln Volume • Oxford Avcnue,INavajo StTeet;\-Vind~rmcrc Street lnlcrst!l'.liun
Pedestrian move ments were recorded at this intersection to understand the levels and patterns
across each approach. As information, pedestrian crosswalks and traffic signal indications are
provided fo r movements acro ss the north . south and east approaches at the intersection.
Pedest rian volume was six or less using any crosswalk during the AM and PM peak hours . Of
note, ped es trians are crossing along the west side of the intersection without a crosswa lk or
pedest11an signal indication . Three pedes tr ian s were reco rded making this movement during
the AM peak hour, while six were ,ecord ed during the PM peak hour.
rlll FELSUU I\G
• HO LT &
U LI.E VI G P11gr6
xxxx
X(X/
,nmposit, P,nk Hoilll : 7·)0 -8.JOam; 4 J0 -5:J0pm
LEGFNO
0.11ford Aven 1Je
17 ,825
AM(PM) Peak ~lour 1rafflc~olu'1C5 -]
Dai ly Tr afli r: Vo lumP.
AM(PM) Peak ltour Pcdcs1nan Volume
3n~:l i::! !1;(187)7
S/2/H
"' ,_
;::
•
:..w..:1 .,.,,,,
~;~
Figure4
Ex isting Vehicle & Pedestrian Volumes
•
8/C
Oxfo rd Avenr..c
Llne Assi9nm enl I == T1 arHt;Si g11 a1 " XIX ~ AM /PM Peak Hour lnle rsec lion "' 0
~
i
figure 5.
Existing Intersection Geometry & Levels of Servic
~
•
O.,fori1 St11tio11 Traffic /111p11ct ,'\11(1/ysis
11.J Opern tio11al A.1111/yses of Existi11s Coruliliu11s
Level of service (LOS) analyses were conducted for each intersection during the AM and PM peak
hours of vehicle activity . These analyses were conducted using the Synchro analysis software tool
w hi ch allows for calculation of control delay using the methnc1olog ies of the Hinhway C;1pacity Manual,
T ra nsportation Research Board, 20 10 . These analyses use the existing traffic volumes. intersection
geometry (i.e ., the number of through lanes and left or right tum lanes), and intersection trattic control
to estimate levels of service . Signal timing c1;ita w;is obtained from the City of Englewood and from
CDOT Region 6 to conduct the operational analyses of the evaluated intersections. At the time c f
tralftc <.l"t" recording, the US 85/0xford Avenue intersection operated with a 120 second traHic signal
cycle length. while the Oxford Avenu e/Navajo StreP.t/Windermere Street intersection operated with a 60
second cycle length during both peak hours. It is understood that signal timing has recently bee n
rwisi,<.l ; th e new signal timing as provided by the Denver Regronal Council of Governments (DRCOG)
was us e d in evaluating future Background and Build-Out conc1itions .
L ev.,1 of serv ice c"ti,gorizes the ease of traffic flow through an intersection with operational
design,itions from A through F . Level of servir.e A represents relatively uncongested traffic fl o w with
little or no vehicle delay. while LOS F represents greater delay and more congestic.n . Level of service
an .. lyst<s for stop-siyn controlled or signalized Intersections are based on average vehicle delay and
they follow the same LOS A to LOS F representations : however. thr. LOS delay parnmoters vary
between stop-sign controlled and signalized intersections. Level of service delay characteristi~s for
stop-controlled and siynaliz~<.l intersi,ctions is Included In Appendix B. •
• The results of these analyses indicate the following:
•
US 85/0xford Avenue Intersection
• AM Peak Hour -LOS E exists for overall intersection operations with several individual
rnuvaments operating at LOSE and LOS F. Of particular note, the northbound and
southbound left turn movements ;incl the southhound through movement operate at
LOS F.
• PM Peak Hour -Several movements operate with a LOS E or F designation whi ch
m su lts in LOS D for th e ent ire inte rsection. Movements operating at LOS F are th e
eastbound, westbound and northbound left turns and the westbound through movement.
O xforc1 AvonuA /N ;ivajn Street/Windermere Street lntersect,on
• AM Peak Hour -LOS B is cu rrently found al this intersection . All individual m ovements
operate at LOS C or better .
• PM Peak Hour -All movements except one operato at LOS B or better for a resultan\
inte rs~ct ion l()S of C. The northbound left \urn movement from Navajo S;reel onto
westbound Oxford Avenue currently operates al LOS F. It appears that LOS F is a
result of excessive westbound vehic le queuing at US 85 which fills the available space
b etween US 85 and Navajo StreetNV :nderme re Street such that northbound left turns d o
not have s pace to proceed into.
Level of service results for existing conditions is in cluded on Figure 5; this figure also includes
the exi sting intersect,on geometry for the studied locations. Appendix C contains the traffic
onaly sis worksheets for existing condi tions .
• FEI.SnL'l{G (ii H OLT &
UI.L EVIO Png eS
OA/ord St"tio11 Trnffic 1111pact Au,1/11 .~is
Ill. PRQJ:,CTED BACKGROUND CONDITIONS
When ev a luoliny futu re corn.lil 1uns for a new project, It ls necessary to understand how traffic
along the existing roadway system is expected to grow and how well the local street network will
operate wi thout the pro;>osed project so that the impacts or the new project can be easily
identified. As such . this section evaluates the Background traffic levels and operational
condit,ons for Year 2014, an approximate two-year period from the time of preparation of this
report . Given projected spprovol timefromcs, and construction and tenant occupancy
schedules , a Year 2014 evaluation is considered reasonable This tin,eframe wil l be 1efe11ed lo
as the Build-Out scenario for the remainder of this report
The follow ing sections discuss information related to the development of traffic volume
estimates, projected LOS . and infrastructure requirements fn r the Build-Out timefmme .
111.1 \'car 2014 Bt1ckgrmmd 'fraffic Projcctions
The DR COG transportation preuicuon models for the Years 2010 and 2035 were rev iewed to
understand the projected increases in traffic volume alonq the local street ne•work in this area of
the City of Englewr,od . To estimate increases in traffic. voh,m e levels at Iha sturfy ~rM
intersections for the Builc1 -0ut timeframe , a compounded annual growth rate was calculated
using the DRCOG Year 2010 and Year 20 35 doily traffic volumo estimates .
•
DRCOG predicts a compoundeu gruNth ,ate in u,Jily trarnc of approximately 1.59% along Oxford •
Avenue , with a higher rate of 2 .54% along NavaJo Street. To predict Background tratlic volume
levels fo r the Year 2014, a two-year growth period, traffic alon!'.) Oxford Avenue was increased
by 1.59% per year for a total increase of 3.21%, whi le traffic along Navajo Street was increased
by 5.14% to reflect Background traffic for the Bllild-Out evaluat ion year. Traffic volumes at the
US 85/0xford Avenue intersection that are influenced by movements along Oxford Avenue were
also increased by 3.21 %. Projected Backg round traffic volumes for Year 2014 are shown on
Figure 6.
111.2 Operntioua/ All{1/ysl!s of Yc11r 2014 (Jiickgrormd Coudilious
As noted in the previous section, traffic volumes along the loca l street network ore pr Jjcctcd to
increase by th e Year 20 14 . /Is such these levels of increase will impact the ope ratio:is of the
surrounding intersections 10 1e ext ent . Level or ~~rvice analys es were cum.lucled u~in g lhe
11 affic volume tstimat"s , 6 and the Highway Capacity Ma nual methodolog ,es to
ascerta,n how well :nters ...... swill operate fo r th is future condition.
Additionally , signal timing data developecl hy DRCOG was used for the analysis of Background
conditions at both the US 85/0xford Avenue and Oxford Avenue/Navajo SlreeV Windermere
Street intersections (without modifications).
IJ FE i.SHI 1Ri7 r • H OLT &
ULLEVI U I'ng c9
•
LEGEND
XX)(XXXI
xxxx
AM(Pr~J Pe ak Ho ur Tra lllc Vo lu mes
Daily Tralfi c Volu me
LEGEND
Oxford Avenue
18 ,400
Oxford Avenul!
Lane Assign mc ni
Traffic Signal
AM.'PM Peak Hou r Inter sec tion
Level of Sef'/iCC
2W!100l _J 115 375 -
120 195 7
C, .. .. ....
Figure&
Year 2014 Rackground Traffic Volumes
UI!)
Figure 7
Year 2014 Background Inte rsection Geometry & Levels of Service
r., I' ~
Oxforc.' Statio11 Tmffic Impact A11,1/ysis
The signal timing rc•,isi ons incrcosed the traffic signal cycle length at the US OS/Oxford Avenue
intersection to 150 seconds, while the cycle length al the Oi<ford Avenue/Navajo
StreetWindermere Street intersecti on was incn,ased to 75 seconds. These revisions come with
changes also to the Individual phases at ea:h intersection .
The capacity analyses found that some peak hour intersection levels of serv ice w,11 see
improved operations , while others w,11 see increased delay. For example, referring to Figures 5
and 7, the US 85/Oxford Avenue intersection will see improvements durin9 the AM peak hour
(LOS E to LOS D). while the PM peak hour will see a reduction in level of service (LOS D to
LOSE).
In regrm1~ to individuR 1 intP.r.::,.ec1inn mov ements , some movements see improvements in
operations while others do not. Of note, the northbound left turn movement from Navajo Street
onto westbound Oxford Avenue will contin ue to operate at LOS F during the PM peak hour (the
same as :'or existing conditions). Operational analyses indicate thot marked ,mprovoment (LOS
D to LOS C in tho AM peak hour and LOS F to LOS C during the PM peak hou r) would occur for
this move ment if a protected left turn phase ii.e., g ree n arrow) is provided. Northbound vehicle
queue length is also reduced with th is operational change.
Figure 7 represe nts the LOS results and the associated geometric intrastructure fo r the Year
2014 Ba ckground time period . Appendix O includes the operational analysis worksheets for
Background cond1t1ons.
•,~ FELSllURG 'IIH O L T &
\JL LE \'IG Pt1gi: 11
•
•
•
•
•
•
04ord St,1tio11 Traffic I111p11cl A1111/ysi,
IV . PROJECTED BUILD-OUT CONDITIONS
IV.1 O,ford Station Dcvclop111e11t C/Jaractcri.<tics
Oxford Station is proposing to construct a new apartment complex with 250 dwelling units in the
southwest corner of the Oxford Avenue/Navajo Street/Windermere Street intersection in the City
of Englewood, Colorado. Oxford Station proposes a new site access oriented along Navajo
Street approximately 450 ' from the south flowline of Oxford Avenue . The apartment complex
will also include lobJy and common areas , while a pool plaza is proposed as an amenity for
apar1mP.nt tP.nant~.
IV.2 '/'rip Gmcratio11 Estimates
The close proximity of Oxford Station to the Oxford/City of Sheridan light rail station will provide
an opportunity to promote the project as a transit-oriented residential development; one that wi I
allraet apartment tenants that desire to use light rail for typical daily commuter trips. Pro•imity
to the light rail station will rnrtuce the impact nf new vehicle-trips by having rail transit access
within walking distance .
Estimates of new vehicle-trips for ,he apartment comple• were first estimated based on
information contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) publication Tull.
Generation , s~ edition. Consideration of transit opportunities nlong with other factors must be
weighed, however, to properly evaluate the actual number of new ,ehicle-trips that Oxford
Station will add lo the e•isting street network. The following section summarizes information on
trip-making reductio ·1s that can be used to adjust the standard ITE trip rates for this project.
IV .2.1 Transit Allowance
Given the close proximity of the Oxford/City of Sheridan light rail station to the proposed Oxford
Stat ion development. residents of Oxford Station will have the opportunity lo use transit for trips
to/from work and fr• other purposes . Oxford Station prov,~es the opportunity for those people
who wish to live nL,: a light rail station to take advantage of ;ts convenience, while also
providing a housing option for those people who may be transi dependent. Oxford Station
residents will also use light rail to some extent for recreational ;.ips.
To ascertain the level of pot e ntial tra nsit trip red uctions related lo lhe proximity or lhe ••isling
light rail stat,on . information contained in Effects of TOD on Housina Parkina and TravP.I hy th P.
Transit Cooperalive Research Program (TCRP Report 128) was consulted . Section 2 of this
pulJl i~aliun includes a specific case study on how projects adjacent to a ra,I station can affect
VP.hicle-trips This case study researched 17 housing projects in four cities in the United States
and found that upwards of 50% of daily and AM and PM peak hour vehicle -trips are eliminated
when residential deve lopments are located nP.ar rail stations .
•r~ FE LSllURG
11111 HOL T &
U I.LEVIG
Oxforrl St11tio11 Traff ic l1111111rt A11alysi.s
Sin ce this publ ication conducted their research in cities with a higher density th an the Denver
metropoli tan area , it's unl ikely that Oxford Station will obtain thtistl levels of trip re duction . As a
comparison, thti lnstitule of Transportation Engineer's pubhcat 1on Trip Generation Handbook
was consulted . This publ ication in cludes in Appondix B-Effects of Transportation Demand
Management (TOM) and Transit on Trip Generation inlormalion on approximat e roduct ions in
vehicle-trips fo r developments with ce rta in characteristics . The information conlained in th is
publ,calion implies that a 10% reduction in vchicle-tri1=s could occu r strictly given the projects'
location .
As noted , th e empmcal data at th e 17 1 CRP sites found a mu ch higher tnp qeneration reduction
than what ITE wou ld imply . As such, it is estimated that Oxford Station will have a trip reducti on
capability somewhere betweP.n the sP. twn estimates
Other Considcrotions
1. Bus Transit-A Reg ional Transportation District bus route (Route 51) 1s orient ed along
Oxford Aaenue with connections to Hampd en Avenue and other locations in the City of
Englewood as well as to other near.:iy destinations .
Employment -There is also the potential that some apa nment res idents cou ld choose to
livP. ,it Oxforc1 Stat ion because they will be within close proximity of num ero us
employment opportunities . Living in an opartmcnt ot Oxford Station would allow
somconi, to walk or bike to one of the nearby light industrial businesses .
•
When conslder1ng all of these factors , ,t ,s es timated that vehicle-trip reductions for a purely •
residential project such as Oxford Station will be 30% during th e AM and PM peak hours and
also on a daily basis . The trip generation estimates fnr the 250 apartments with the allowance
for transit trip red uctions a re co ntained in Table 1.
Table 1 . Estimates of Oxford Station Trip Generation -
From Trip Gc11emho11 by the Institute of Transportation Enginee r s
Apartment ' DI/ 250
TOO Reductions (-30%)
TOTAL NEW TRIPS
ITE Land Use Ca le gory · 22 0
•r'.:.il FEI SBURG
.M O t.T -S.
UL I.F.V I G
1,639 25
-492 -8
1 ,147 17
101 126 10 1 54 155
-30 -3 8 -30 ·1 6 -47
71 88 71 38 108
•
•
•
•
Traffic Impact A1111/y s is
l\'.3 Site-L,·11ert1ted Traffic Vo/11111cs 1111d Trip Distrib11tio11
Oxford Station is proposing one access point for the project along Navajo Street . As such, all
inbound and outbound vehicle movements wi ll use this access and vesicle routes will be
oriented along Navajo Street to/from the north or south. Primary access routes have a high
orient;ition to/from the north or south along US 85 (Santa Fe Drive).
The traffic volumes of Table 1 were assigned to the locAI strP.At network based on the proposed
access scenario, on existing travel patterns and on engineering judgment. The est imated
distribution of all vehicle-trips can be found on Figure 8 and ar":
• 35% to /from the north along US 85
• 30% to/fro m the south along US 85
10% to/from the east along Oxford Avenue
• 5% to/from the west along Oxford Avenue
10% to/from the south along Navajo Street
• 10% to/from the north along Windermere Street
/V.4 Tot11/ Traffic \10/11111,•s
The Background traffic volume estimates for Yoar 2014 (Figure 6) were combined with the trip
generation assignment for Oxford Station to develop projections of traffic volumes when the
proj ect is fully constructed and occupied (Year 2014). Figure 9 repre~ents the projected traffic
volume levels fo r the Build-Out time period .
IV.5 Traffic Sig,,alizlltioJl Wnm111I /t.11alysis -Ncwnjo Street/O.,fvrd S/1tli1m
Access fotersectio11
Th e Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices /MUTGD/ outlines nine warrants that can be
used as guidance in delermininn when an intersection may benefit from the installalion of a new
traffic signal. When evaluating ,uture intersection cond itions . only one warrant, Warrant 3 •
Peak Hour, can be evaluated with any confidence since peak hour traffic volumes are typir.ally
proj ected when analyzing the impacts of a new project.
It must be pointed out, however, that the MUTCO states that 1is signal warran: should only be
usHd in ·unusual cases, such as office complexes, manufacturing plants, indus:rial complexes,
or high-occupancy vehicle facilities that attract or discharge large number~ of vehicles over a
short time ." This is not the case for the Navajo StreeVOxford Stati on Access intersection . II is
th e best to ol availabl e, however, to provide an Indication of whetl1 ei oi 11ut a11 i11l e rti.,ctio11 could
benefit from th e instnll~lion of a traffic signal. and it does serve as~ guide on whether or not
other signalization w ;., ,,mis may be met. These other warrants cannot be evaluated properly ,
-howev er. until Oxfo;-J 3tation i~ fully r.r,11,,tru cled and occupi ed . T raffle signal analyses using
Warrant 3 are on ly 1~•:,uded in th is analysis as a gu ide for the potential of s,gnalizat:on, not as a
recomme ndation .
•r~ FL511U RG ~ H O L T ~,
u l.1.F.V I G l'n,ge 14
60
~
5'71)
iG ?5 113 1 ;;; ~;\lb :
114 )-r
LEGEND
.,., .. ..,
~
XXX(XXX) AM{P MJ Peak Hour Tralhc Vol umes
XXXX -lloi li TrnttlcVc lumc
XX % Si te. Tnp Dlstnhulinn
805 r 2(7) 115 01dordA1·t."nur.-
+--+
10%
•
•
Figure B
Site Generated Traffi c Vol umes.
•
•
•
LEGEND
XXX (XXX )
xxxx
AM(PM) Peak !lour Traffic Volumes
Oaily iraffic Volume
LEGEIID
Odord Ave.iue
19,205
Q,:for r1 Avenue
------------
_,,,,~ Lane Assignment a ; Traff ic Signa l
X/'X = AM/PM Peak Hour Intersection
l.evel of Serv ic e
xi• a AM/PM Peak Hour Movemen t
Level of Serv co
Figure 9
Year 2014 Build-Out Traffic Volumes
11/C --~ ,,
•,• ~
.,) ·11-·
Figure 10
Year 2014 Build-Out Intersection Geometry & Levels of Service
Oxfo,·d Statio11 Tm/fie l111p11cl A1111/ysis
The evaluation nl this intersection, usi ng only Warrant 3 criteria, indicates that th is intersection
is not projected to meet tho criteria for installation of a traffic signal for the Year 2014 time
period (see Appendix E) Peak hour traffic vulumes along Nava jo Street and exiting the Oxford
Station access are simply not sufficient to meet the criteria of \his warrant and. therefore, othe r
signalization warrants are not expected to be met either. As such, the Nav~jo Streel/Oxlord
Station access intersection will be analyzed for operationa l characteristics as a stop -controlllOd
intersection in subsequent sections, i.e .. with a stop sign on the Oxford Station access aµproach
{eastbound direction).
lV.6 Decelerah'ou Lnuc Requiti'!111cuts
As can be seen on Figure 9 , a relative ly small number of ve hicles will proceed from Navaj o
Street onto the Oxford Station access -maxi mum number of turning vehicles is approximately
nne per m in1rte in the PM peak hour. Auxiliary lanes for northbound lef: turn or southbound right
turn movements are not do omed necessary for this project. As such , operational analyses
c::,nducted for the Bu ild-Out condition {which are summarized in the next section) were
conducted assuming only one lane tor shared vehicle movements in both the northbound and
so.,thbound directions of Navajo Street.
IV.7 np,·ratio11,1I Aualyses o/811ihl-011t (Ywr 2014) Cum/i!iu11s
Capacity analyses of the Build-Out co ndition indicate that overall intersection levels o f serv1ce
•
for signalized intersections will rema in relati vely constant with the addition of Oxford Station. It •
is recognized that some movements will see increases in average ve hicle delay from the
Background analysis scenario due to the addlt ior al the site-generated traffic. Minor
modifications to the traffic signal timinq parameters at the O,ford AvenuelNava io Street
intersection {more green ti me for north/south movements) c.ould imrmve intersection ope rations
{LOS D to LOS C during the PM peak hour) from B"ckground conditions.
One operational Improvement could be considered , however, to rmprove the level of service for
the northbound left turn movement from Navajo Street onto westhound Oxford Avenue and to
reduce northbound vehide queuing . Operational analyses indicate tha t marked improvement
could occur for this movement if o protected left turn phase (1.e .. green arrow) is provided {LOS
F to LOS C for the northbound left turn movement during t11e PM µeak hour). The length of
vehicle queuing would also be greatly reduced by the ,mplementation of this operational change
such that modifications to the length al the left turn lane is not requi red . More detai led analysP.s
of this change should occur before implement 1tion is co nsidered , howeve r . Oxford Station is
committed to conducting these analyses and they ~ommil 10 working with the City of Englewood
tu ,.,solv" matte, s at the Osford Avenue/Navajo Street Intersection that a re a direct result of
traffic impacts caused by this project.
These analyses also find that the new intersection nlong No\'ojo Street for movernents to/from
the Oxford Station access will operate we ll during \he µeak ho urs of a typical weekday . LOS C
or better can be achieved .
•,~ FHSDURG • I-IOL T &
UI.I .EV\r.
•
•
•
•
Oxford Stntion Trnffic I111pt1ct A11nlysi s
See Figure 10 for a representation of the intersection and movement LOS a! the project
intersections. Appendix F includes the level of service analysis worksheets for Build-Out
conditions .
IV.8 l'edestri1111 Snfeti; lss11 e., -Oxford lig/11 /foil Stntion .'\cces;
The analyses contained in the previous sections of this report have focused on vehicle
operations at the existing public street intersections and al the new site access po:~t. There are
some pedestrian sa fety issues that could be addressed si nce Oxford Station will be promoting
additional pedestrian movements between the project si te and the Oxford /City of Sheridan light
rail station .
The information contained in this section summarize observatior,s of exist ing conditions and,
therefore , the recommendations of thi s section would provide" safe r pedestrian environment for
P.xisting City of Englewood residents and pmrons of the exist ing light rail station . Since Oxford
Station will increase pedestrian movem ents between the project site anc the lig ht rail station .
th ese re commendations will benefit both existing and future pedestrians .
lV.8.1 Site Observations
The following are observations and points of fact that were found at the Oxford Avenue/Navajo
Street/Windermere Street intersection and along Windermere Street . ·
• P~destrian crosswalks and pedestrian traffic signal ind ications ex ist on three sides of the
vxford Avenue/Navajo Street/Windermere Street intersection -on the north, soulh and
east sides.
• A total o f 19 pedestrians used one of the crosswalks at the Oxford Avenue/Navajo
Street/Windermere Street intersectiun during the AM peak hour, whilA 17 pedest rians
used one of these crosswalks during the PM peak hour.
• Three pedestrians du ri ng the AM peak hour and six during the PM peak hour crossed
Oxford Avenue along the west side or the Oxford Avenue/Navajo Street/Wincermere
Street intersection -the west side of this intersection does not have a designated
crosswa lk or pedestrian signal indications .
• Some pedestrians crossed Windermere Street in a d.agonal fa,•11 on just to the north of
Oxford Avenue (i.e .. not with'n the crosswalk).
• Th ere is;;, ''-msswalk Ahea d" sign located on W inder mere Stre et in advance of the
Oxford/(;11y of Sheridan hght rai l station ; how0 -, a crosswalk fo r movements between
tlie east and west sides of Windermere Street ooes not exist (i.e .. no curb ramps .
crosswalk pavement markings. or sisning).
• A few pedeslrians walked southbound along the east side of Navajo Street to reach the
on-street parking spaces that exist appr oximat ely 350' to tile suu lh of Oxford Avenue ,
sid e walk does not exi st along the east side of Navajo Street in th is area .
•r~ f ELSl.l UR O • H O LT .\
ULLEV IG 1'11gc 18
Oxford St11tio11 Traffic l1111'art A11al11sis
IV.8.2 Pcdcstri~n Sructy Recommendations
Once Oxford Station is constructed, it is recognized that more pedAstr1ans will walk between
Oxford Station and the Oxford/City of Sheridan light ra·I station . As such, providing a safe and
convenient access route between the two destinations is important. Two primary pedestrian
;:iccess improvements are recommended :
1. Pedestrian Crossing of Oxford Avenue CE,isting Condition) -As noted in Section IV.8.1 ,
pedestrians cross Oxford Street on the west side of the Oxford Ave nue/Navajo
StreeVW1ndermere Street intersection without th e benefit of a marked crosswalk or a
pedestrian t raffic signal indication . Given existing conditions, ii is recommended that
additional signing be p rov ided to direcl pedestrians to the existing crosswalks to
progress between the north and south sides of Orlord Street. Signing such as shown
below (MUTCD signs R9-3 and R9-3bP) should be installed as close to the location
where the crossing maneuvers on the west side of the intersection are occurring .
As an alternative , and only ii the ins:allation of a northbound left turn phase (i .e ., g reen
;irrow) is provided for the northbound Navajo Street lo westbound Oxford Avenue
movement (Section IV. 7), a new crosswalk could be installed across the west side o f this
intersection . Consideration of the ad dition of this crosswalk srould be thoroughly
evaluated relative to its impacts to vehic le movernt!nts at this interst!ction and th~
interaction this change cou:d have with other vehicl e movements a!ong Oxford Avenue
and/or at the US BS/Oxford Avenue intersection .
2 . Grade-SApRrRtinn Over Oxforrl AvP.n11 P. -As a Iona-term so lution , a grade-separated
crossing over Oxford i>.venue should be considered . The construction of a grade-
separated cross,ng could benefit e x1s l •ng City of Englewood res idents and light rail
patrons as well as the new Oxford Station t<J nants . OxfunJ St;;tion is Iest,rvIny space for
the construction of the grade-separation a nd for pedestrian access to/from the grade-
separat ion for thei r tenants.
•r'..il FELSf\URG
.II O LT &
U LL EV I G
•
•
•
•
•
•
Tmffit· l111111 1cl Ana lysis
IV.9 lllfrns/r11ct11re for B11ild-011t (Yen, 2014) Con dit ions
Table 2 summarizes lhe operational and physical improvements needed to address the traffic
impacts and pedestrian safety improvements associ3ted with the Build-Out of Oxford Station
and to address existing pedestrian safety concerns .
Table 2. lnfraslntcture Requirements for Build-Out (Year 2014) Conditions
!f iM''·-}6t~.t;~-,;1:r Jtlti~~~ ~.., ... -r!t .. ~ ..... ~~,,.•o·c..::. :•.•,1,v _;:;.,..~yi.
Oxford Avenue/Navajo
Stree~Windermere Street
Intersection
Navojo Strcot'Oxlord
Station A ccess
Intersec tion
•r.iil FELS BUI\U
• H O LT &
UI.L~VI U
~t~1~~i~~~~i~fn~1lm.f P:\it~~:rt~!_;tlRi i~{R,tt!11t.
Add protected/pennissive left turn phasi ng for the northbound left
turn lane . Coordinate this phasing change with existing signal
timing parameters at the US 85/0xlord Ave nue intersection.
Oxford Station is committing to cond uct more deta iled operational
analyses to veri fy this recommend ation .
Insta ll signing to restrict pedestrian c rossing maneuvers across the
west side of this intersection S!! insta ll a pedestrian crosswalk on
the west side of this intersection if the left turn phasi ng is installed
as noted above .
If left tum phasing fo r the north:>ound Navajo Street left turn
mo vem~nt is not Installed , the northbound left tum lane and
centerl ine pavement ma rk ings should he modified to extend the
existing northbound left turn lao P. to the exlent possible towards the
location of the pro po sed Oxford Stati on access. This Improvement
will reQuire a restriction of the northernmost parking spaces on the
east side of Navajo Street. however .
Reserve space for a fulure grade-separated pedestrian crossing of
Oxford Avenue and space for pedestrian access to/from the grade-
sep::iration stru cture .
In sta ll a stop sig n on the Oxford Sta tio n access to control
eastbound move ments.
P11gc 2n
Oxford Statio11 Traffic Impact A1111/ysis
V. SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS
Oxford Station, a new apartment complex, is heing proposed on a parcel nf land in the
southwest corner of the Oxford Avenue/Navajo ~\r;;.:,t. Windermere Street intersection in the City
of Englewood. The project site is bounded by Oxford Avenue on the north, by Navajo Street on
lhe east, by Regional Transportation District and Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway tracks
on tne west, and by an industrial parcel to the south .
Oxford Station is proposing to construct a 250 unit apartment complex that will also include
lobby and common areas, while a pool plaza is proposed as an amenity for apartment tenants .
Oxford Station plans to utilize its location near lhe Oxford/City of Shctidan light roil station as a
marketing point for the project; one lhal will attract a partment tenants U1<1l <lt!sir" lo use liyhl rail
for typical commuter and recreational trips. Prox imity to the light rail station will reduce the
impact al new vehic le-trips by having ra il transit access within walking distance .
A singlP. point o f accP.ss is proposed on Navajo Street towards the southern boundary of the
project frontage .
Given the p1oxi111ity of the Oxfo ru /Cily uf Sh~ridan liyht rail station, many apa rtrne11t dwell ers will
use transit for a portion of their daily trips. An estimate of 30% of all vehicle-trips ,s projected to
use rail transit or the existing bus transit along Oxford Avenue. As such, about 1 ,150 daily
vehicle trips . 90 AM peak hour trips, and 110 PM peak hour trips are pro jected to be added to
the strP.P.t nP.twork as a result of this project .
Operational analyses indicate that only two improvements are needed to enhance vehicle
operations :
1 . It is recommended to evaluate in a more deta iled manner adding an exclusive left turn
phase (i.e , "green arrow") for northbound left turn movements at the Oxford
Avenue/Navajo Street/Windermere Street intersection . This addition is projected to
improve vehicle operations, while also reducing northbound vehicle queuing on Navajo
Street.
~-II tne left turn pnasing for the northbound left turn on Navajo Street is !!.2! installed , the
northbound left turn lane should be lengthened to the extent possible, i.e .. towards the
proposed Oxford StRlion access This improvement will require a restriction of the
northernmost parking spaces on the east sido of Navajo Street
Rei.;u1n1 nt:!ndt:!U pl.:!Uestric.-111 safety 1mprov e rnents include :
1. Add signing to direct pedestrians to use the existing crosswalks to redu ce th e number of
pedestriRns that r.ross Ox ford Avenue Rlono the west ~ide of the Oxford Av enu e/Navajo
Street/Windermere Street intersection (i.e., a marked crosswalk and/or pedestrian signal
indications do nol exist) Qr, install a pedestrian crosswalk on the west side of this
intersec liun if lhe left tum phasi ng is ;nstalled as noted abuvt!.
•r'.ilfm .SllURO
• ttOL T &
Ul.1.EVIG
•
•
•
•
•
•
Oxford St11tio11 Traffic /111p11ct t\1111/ysis
2. As a long -t erm solution, a grade-separated crossing over Ox1ord Avenu e should be
considered. The construction of a grade-separated crossing could benefit existing City
of Englewood residents and liyht rail µatrons as well as the new Oxford Station tenants.
Oxford Staiion is reserving space fo7 the construction of the grade-separation and for
pedestrian access to/from tho grade -separation for their tenants .
In summary. Oxford Station will contribute additional vehicles and pedestrians to the
transportat io n sy stem: however, the improvements identified in the table below are sufficient to
address the impac ts of the construction of Oxford Station .
Infrastructure Requirements for Build-Out (Year 2014) Co nditions
·-\i:~·~&-~~:rv~·~.t:·q?.t~)i ·~~~~~i
Oxford Avenue/Navajo
Street/Windermere Street
Intersection
Navajo StreeVOxford
Station Acces s
Intersection
•.,'.ii f EL SlllJ RO
.H O L T !,
IJLLE VIG
/i·;:/C~}f )J;~~-:X.\i~l ?/11i;.~)ifi~i9:~~~~~~!t~.~--~-:·.::::.:::.:(~·=~-.. :';:~(::::~:7.: '\\;
Add protected/permissive left turn pha~ing f'lt the northbound lett
tu rn lane . Coordinate th is phasing change ,,ith e xis ting signal
ti ming parameters at the US 85/0xford Aven ue intersection .
Oxford Station is committing to conduct more detailed o~erational
analyses to verify this recommendation.
Instal l signing to restri ct pedestrian crossing maneuvers across tho
west side of this intersection 2! install a pedestrian crosswalk on
the west side of this intersection if the left turn phasing is installed
as noted above.
If left turn phasing for th e nurthuound Navajo Strt<~t lllft turn
movement is not installed, the northbound left turn lane and
centerline pavement markings should be modified to exte nd the
existing northbound leit turn lane to the extent possible IOwards th e
location of the proposed Oxford Station access. This improvement
will requ ire a restriction of the northernmost parking spaces on the
east side of Navajo Street, however.
Reser,e space for a future grade-separated pedestrian crossing of
Oxford /\venue and spnco for pedcstrion access to/from the grade ·
separation structure .
lnstal: a stop sign on the Oxford Station access t o cc,, ,trol
eastbound movements.
Oxford St11tio11
APPENDIX A
•r';,11 FEI.S llUR O
• /I O L T &
I i i I.E V I U
EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNT DAT A
Traffic l111p11 ct Analysis •
•
•
.-1,,,,.,,,,,i,\'t\
•
!;rt Ti me
0 /:00AP✓-
0 7:1S AM
07:30 AM
07:,S AM
Total ,
:;~:~I
g:~~l
Total\
Gran d Tota l I """'ch,:. Tc1a1,:.
•
•
Fi le N ame : #1 SANT EF E&OXFORDAM
Sile Code : OO OO OOOfl
Sta rt Da te : 4/17/20 12
Pa ge No : 1
SANTI: FE ---.--OKFORD SANTE FE I OKFORD
~• P,tnlod CIAH 1
S oulhbound
~ght I Th ru I Left
22 ,o, 43
30 527 39 •• 523 ,o ., 69 1 8.S
140 2145 207 ,. 5" •• " 55 7 45
53 522 ..
33 5 18 " "' 21,0 ;55
308 4265 392
67 8!, 7 79 a 38 3.3
WH tboul'l d Northbound Eastboun d
01hitr Roni I Th"' I Lehi O:~r •on, I n,,. I Lert I O~r ! RghtJ Thru i ldl l Othar . 1n1 iotal I
u •• ,.
0 114 41
0 75 58
I B6 68 i r,,,-194
78 76
58 •• .. ., .. 33
227 , ..
o; I 540 393
•• 3 35.1
0.1 •• 3.3
22 0 42 ,,. 0 24 ,. 0 19
18 0 15
81 0 100
28 21
20 11
.'Ill 27 ,. 2C
IOS •
186
g\
174
160 3e
1.0 1.!
411 f2Q12 tl 7 00 .,..,1
•117/2017 Clll45AHI
Cl:i n1
419 •• iLJi ,. 1• "I ""' 38◄ 69 O 26 O'l 37 !-1370 .. , 74 0 27 115 37 ' 1 ◄83
545 2!~ -~I ,~~--1~,¥o--:.(~~ 1700
518 52 Jl •• 54 UL ISSO
571 43 31 62 30 2 1~~
!:-SSI " 38 66 1 1 0 -.51;1 ,,. 52 33 47 :W 1 1◄i-n
'19 1A n -25~-3 ·1 -so:..r
3980 429
g I ,., Q2 j 789
0 'i '1fl.·\J
as.a 9 .4 " 53 .S 24 8
JJ.6 3.8 21 S.3 , . 0 1
SANTEFE
hS~ta-rt~T~im-e+-R-~-.._-l
8"';'°"'_~T°J:~1··~'.>:~e-:
··-030015M •• 013 41 2
D:S 1~F'M 63U 49 5
03 30 PP.A 820 43 3
-~0~><-,;.-:"",~-1:~ ,~~~ t~~ ... r:-
•tW•
• Ptlnl•d-CJ .. , 1
File Name
Site Code
Start Date
Page No
:#1SANTEFE&OXFORDPM
. 00000000
: 4/17/2012
: 1
SANTE FE OXFORD
Northbound Eaatbound
lhru Left 0111,, Rghl Thru Left Oltll!f hi To\Jl
Jes es 1 e1 59 60 , -,54e·
4 'f !i! ~~ ~ ~~ :~ ~ ~\ ~:!;
,;~ --~-,:::-2~i,--~-+--=2:"':-""'~~--2~~ ~I ~~~
483 69 611 89 76
497 62 65 77 S2
499 64 ·14 95 6' ;t-~;-,,,;~;;•;,-.,:,;;,---;;+-..;,:,,:-3~~ 21 ~
g: ~~ ~~ !: :~: ;: ~ 1 :~ g~ !~ i~ :~ :: ~~ :: !:
O:iJC f-'M 40 614 :iti 61 Ge 110 59 JO 46! 56 7J 7J 59
--0 •-◄~ta.'s~+--,,,.,;;c'-./;;Jci"-,-"~~-2~1 2~~ --,,.;::,.:~,m:;;;.~----'i-!,-.,,~~i ,~~ 2~~ ... ~-1-.,.""6"°;-~,,;;;!;-~,~~~;--;,l--..;;::;..
Gr-.nd TOI.al I 514
APPfch ~ s.e
Total% 2)
7641
86.9
37.S
601
66
29
3~ t
•·· \ 0 .2
1116 ..
5.5
506
235
2.9 :, I ll3 S4Ag
5.1 837
1.6 21
"' 11.1
36
14 85)
0.2 : 34 4
0.1 1 ,.2
,o,
311.4
4 ,4
711
267
35
,, I 0.5
0 .1
20381
•
•
•
•
Start T ime PQh1
-07:00.AM 6
07 :15AM 11
07:30 AM 12
07 :45 AM 10
lut.jl 4 5
Oll'<X'.IAM ,. 6 0
M ·15AM 12 12 ~
08 .30AM 12 7 2
08:45 AM 1 8 1
Tola! 55 33 3
Gmrid 1oll'l1 1 100
A:io •ch% 53.0
Total% 35
" 5
40.3 2 7
2.6 02
•
•
: #2 WI ND ERMERE &OXF ORD AM
: 00000000
: 4/17/2012
:1
oxFo Ro---i
Eastbound
Thn, LoS Othtr ,;,;·,:?~
8 •J 5 3'2
76 •• ~l !~ 82 54
100 57 ·,h-.ffi-341 ~
0 I O 124 > U ' I U <2 ,o O ~ 26 ~ ~ :; ! ~ i : :; ;: ~ ~;
0 253 4 0 92930 0 27
1 8 335 --,4--¾l 33 151 141 4 101
•• 53 390
65 35 312
74 u JJS
55 32 265
259 158 1310
,~ I 18 672 29 I~, 73 302 347 ,1 22 0
" 97 :\ 4 ,n '" 47. I 10 ., 0.6 236 o 3 I 20 10.6 12.2 0 2 · •
600 360 ,, I 26'9 ••• ,.. " 21.1 126 08
File Name
Sile Code
":;tart Dale
Page No
: #2 WIN DER MERE&O XF ORD PM
: oo coooo o
: 4/171201 2
:1
G,o • Pri nted• Cius I
!l.nut hbound
.filfil_l_Ti tTJ~
1
-Rnht rT ,~ri Lett
03:CO PM 25 18 3
C3 :1~PM 27 1a O
C,l :30 PM 21 \3 1
. __ p.:,~~!,&t-{~--:
OITl er , fl11nt l'tw'u ' : "" I .J!tp,r "I , ,cis , 2
~! ~ t ~ ~
I: ~ 11? B 0 . !i-,~ .. ' ·-2, ---J
C5 COFM ,.
31 1 21
125 2G ~I 12
C!i .151-"M •• <12 I 0 . 14'.J ,. 8
O!i JO PM 5P ,H ----i -i l 142 16 10
-~'i 45FM 33 2 j:--teL-H-J~ 1 0 1111 34 ,,--
Gr.andlol.111 Sll )i':1 ,n .. I 26 1-122 131 ''\ 0 1
App·d1% 59.ll 392 , 2 " 1. ,. 5 82 0.6 10.2
iota!% 10 ' 62 :.";4 n3 0 5 ~7 .l 2.5 C.2 1.7
-----,
I
.. ., "I ll 10, 28
1& •. , 1 50 82 28
" JI U J:, 11 0 14
15 .u __ J__ '' ., ,,
61 174 2 149 392 li2
004 m "I 4 72 11 3 1 ?32
2) 6!i ~ 1.2 256 613 12 6
l9 11 2 o, 01 21.7 ◄4
L ------
Ofl'ltt lnl "w\41
-·351 ·
380
479 ,..
15Af
] 50, 501 ••• JGO
1 848
"I ~2 1)
OG
0 2
•
•
•
•
•
•
·-·s1ar1 ,1-:,·:J; ,2
All Traffic Data Sorvices . Inc
9660 W 44th Ave
Wtle,11 Rldoe .ro 80033
'N'NW .elll ru tfi Jata .nel
--·----···----
Page 1 -
Site Codo : 3
Slat.on ID:
OXFORD W/O WINDERMERE
{2';-AM :r~ ·--. ~~il J-12~ _________________ !_o.!;!152
01 :00 21 36 5 7
02 :00 17 30 47
03:00 25 42 67
04 :00 /6 58 134
05:00 162 122 284
06.00 444 """ 790
07 :00 875 568 1443
08.00 f19 530 12•9
09:00 463 495 958
10 no 473 490 963
11('() 530 608 1139
12 /\\P •,, 603 694 1297
,·1 ,'!) 554 558 1112
... :: c,:, !A 2 5'18 1 090
03.C.• 600 799 1399
04 :00 ~SB 032 1490
05:00 640 938 1578
06 :00 ... 544 992
U7 :00 352 302 Gs,
08:00 257 192 449
09 :00 160 144 304
10 :00 86 8'1 1 7U
11 :00 52 47 ._!!_9 Toiai . ITTAr 903(>' 11e11
Percent 49 .3°..i 50.i'¾
AM ?e•k 07 ·00 11 ·00 --·-·----07'oo
Vo l 875 609 1443
PM Peak 16.00 17:00 17 :00
""'G"'ra::cn:::~;';~i:
1
~""1a'l -----~
6
~
5
~
8 •a"1e"'7.---'9
~
3
~
6
,9;;;0rn30' -·-··---------• ·-------· -·-----'-1"'5,7~18'=a~11~
Percent 49.3"/, 50 .7%
ADT ADT 17.817 MDT 17 .817
--,;s,::1a:crt,------,1'"'1'"-Ac-pc-,_-c,2.--·------
Time Tue NB 12:00 AM =~--~~7--
01 :00 10
02 -00 16 oJ ·oo ,
04 .00 10
05:0 0 ◄5
00-00 124
07:CJO 379
08:00 341
09:00 207
10:00 ,17
11 :00 207
12 :00 PM 248
01 :00 226
02:00 239
03:0C 345
04:00 261
os :oo ,tis
06:UG 192
07:00 125
SB ,.
g
4
5
39
55
171
264
220
151
174
196
236
712
232
267
334
438
237
128
08:00 50 84
09:00
10:00
11 .00 ·Tota-,---
45 55
33 35
12 13
3665 3570
50 .2% 40 .8%
-"01""·0"'0~-01 :00
379 264
15 :00 17 :00
Al! Traffic Data Serv 1cg, In c
9660 w 441"1 A've
'Anc.11 Rid oe .co aooJJ
www .alltrafficdat.,.n~I
-----·-------•------
Page 1
Sile Code : 4
Statlcn ID :
NAVAJOS T EIO OXFORD AVE
Tutal -·-,o
2G
6
49
100
358
391
403
4d<
438
471
612
595
703
429
253
13. ,o
68
--25
7175
01 .olf
643
17 :00
Percent
-Ai.H>P.;:tJi
Vol
PM Peak
Vol
Grand Tota 1
Pe,ce1 ;·.
3◄5 438 ----,-3"e,.;J·s--=35i6 -----·
50.2'/u ◄0 .8'/,
-----------______ .......1of,1s
ADT ADT 7,175 AJlDT "/.1/5
•
•
Start 17,Apr.12
Til'TI \ Tue --U:11 •. W-'
0 1:JO
Ol:UO
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:0 0 PM
0 1:00
02 .00
03:00
04 '00
05 :00
06 :00
07 .00 • 08 ·00
09:00
10:00
11:00
r Ota 1
Percent
AM Peak
Vol
PM Peak
Vol.
Grand Tota l
Percenl
ADT
•
NB
8
5
9
9
14
74
145
4 11
322
176
157
198
197
207
171
163
160
179
120
74
35
29
16
10
iBB9
50.4%
07 00
4 11
13.00
207
SB
10
15
7
14
16
27
63
105
102
116
14 1
287
242
HIil
173
206
313
382
184
102
56
46
30
17
2R44
4!1 6%
11:00
287
17 :00
382
2889
AU Traffic Data Sarvu:es, Inc
'.>660 W 44th Av e
"'1eat R dge,CO 80033
www a1ttrafficdat1 .ne t
-----·
2844
50.4o/. 49.6~•.
AO" 5 ,733 AADT 5,133
~ita Cod e: 5
Station 10:
WIN)E:;P.•J ERE NIO OXFORD AVE
Total
18
2 0
16
23
3 0
10 1
208
51 6
424
2 9 2
298
485
439
395
34<
37 1
4 73
581
~o•
176 o,
·15
◄8
27
5733
·0·7:00
5 16
17 :0 0
56 1
5733°
Tmf{ic In1111ic t A1111/11 sis
APPENDI X B LEVEL OF S ERVIC E CRITERIA FOR STOP-
CONTROLLED AND SIG NALIZED INT ERSECTIO NS
TABLE B1 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROLLED (TV'1$C) INTERSECTIONS
Lc_vcl _of Scr:v !co Control o,!ay Range
· lsec/vehl -
A 0 .0 • 10.0
B >10 0 15 .0
C >1 5 0 -25 .0
D >25 0 • 35 .0
E >3 50 -50 .0
•-• ---
F > 50 .0
ft.daotod from Hiohwav Cao .: :v Manuaf. Tronsoort:ition Researc h Board . 2010 .
TABLE B2 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Level of Control Delay Range Qua11ta11v·e ·
Se rv ic e -· 1,i!li,~ehi ·. · tlescrio11 on ·:
A ~100 Good progression, short cycles , ve ry few ve hicle-
sl ops.
B >10 .0 -20 .0 Good progression , and/or short cyc le le ngths , more
ve hicle-stops .
C >2 0 .0 · 35 .0 Fai r prog ression and/o r longer cyc le leng l hs. so me
inrl ivici 11~I r:yr:IP. fr1 il11 rP.~, many VAh icle-stops
D :.-3 5 ,0 • 55.0 Noticeable co ngestion a nd c~cle failu res , unfavorab le
progre ssion . h ig h vi e rati~s. several sto ps.
E >5 5.0 -80.0 Lim it of acce ;itable delay, poor progression . long
cycl es, high v/c ratios , frequent cycle fa ilures.
F > 80 .0 De lay is un accep table to most drivers ; volume
excee ds capacity, breakdown of traffi c fl ow.
Ad ap ted fr om : l-t1qhwov Caoocity Manual, Tra nsocrt ction Rc sc.1rch Beare, 2010 .
•r~ f E:.~lll JI\G • H O L T Sc
U l.i.E V I G
•
•
•
•
•
•
Oxford Station
APPENDIX C
•r:.a ,1::1.s~URG
11111 H O Ll &
U I.L EVJO
Tmf(ic /111p11ct A11alysis
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS -EXISTING
CONDITIONS
A/'1"''"11 .,·C
Que ue s Existing C o nditi ons-AM Pea k Hour
2 : Oxfo rd A ,enu tl & US 85 4119/2012
.,,.• -• ..... f -' " t ~ ~ ! ~
LMe Grou e ESL E9T EBR V<l!L wa r ",'3R NBL NBT NBR . SBL SST -SBR
Lan 11 Corof19uraUons 'l'I tt ,, 'l'I tt -r 'l'I ttt ,, 'l'I ttt I'
vor,me ( ,ph) 159 152 133 95 240 1% 21B 2082 66 219 2294 170
Said . Flow (l:rol) 3433 3539 1583 3433 35 39 15113 3433 5085 1583 3433 50B5 1583
Flt Permitted 0.9 50 0.950 0 950 0.950
Said. Fl ow (per m) 3403 3539 1562 341 3 3539 1562 34 j3 5085 1562 34 31 5085 1563
Satd. Flow (R TOR)
Lane Glou p Flow (vpr.) 215 457 168 116 30? 343 2~5 2313 84 342 171i4 185
Tum Type Frot Free P,ot rree Pro ! Free Pro! Free
Prolected Pha,es 7 3 5 1
Pennijted P!i a,cs Free Free Free f n,e
Tola ! Spl il(s) 15.0 26 .0 a.a 13.0 NO n.o 16 5 69 0 00 120 64 .5 00
Total Loat Time (s) 5.0 6.0 4 0 5.0 6.0 4.0 5.0 6.5 40 50 G.5 4 0
Act :ffct Green (s) 9.9 189 120.0 7.8 16.B 120 0 11.5 62 5 1WO BJ 59 3 120 0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0 08 0.16 1.00 0.06 0.14 100 0.10 0 52 1.00 0.07 0 49 1 nn
vie Ratio 0 76 0 82 0 11 0.52 06 1 0.22 0.90 0 87 0.05 1.44 110 0
Control Delay 71.5 61.7 0 1 58 .4 58 .6 0.3 81 1 30.0 0 1 257.7 81 .6 02
Que ue Delay 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 00 0 0
Tola! Delay 71.5 61 .7 0 1 58 .4 58 .6 0.3 83.1 30.0 0 1 257 .7 81 6 0.2
LOS E E A E E A F C A F F A
ApJYOach De lay 51.9 32.3 34 .9 95l
App-oach LOS D C C F
Queue Lenglh 50th (h) 85 180 0 43 114 0 118 555 0 ·101 -906
Queue Llf1gll ~5lh (ft) 103 200 0 69 158 0 "137 630 0 #187 UR61
tn1ecn a1 L~k orst (hl 625 302 625 6?5
Tum Bay Length (ft) 310 100 220 115 495 340 365 500
Bese Capacily (vph) 286 590 1562 229 531 1562 329 2648 156? 23 8 25 15 1563
S!a ivabon C,p Re ducln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spll back Ca p Red ucm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
S!orage Cap Red ucln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced vie Ratio 0.75 077 0 11 051 0.57 0.22 0.90 0.87 0.05 1.44 1.10 0.12
lniersec llon Su mma !l
Cyde Length : 120
Ac1 ua1ed Cycle Lenyth · 120
01f!et: o (0%), Referencea to ph ase 2:NBT an j 6:SBT, Stan 01 Yellow
co ruol Type : A:tuateo,coorcjn aled
Ma JJ mum v/1; Ratio: i 44
1n1ersec11on Sign al Delay: 62.7 !ntersecoo n LOS : E
11·1ersec11on ~a paoty Uiu!lalon H2 9'4 ICU Leve: of Service E
Analysts ~er,od tl!lln) 1~
-Volume e,ceedS capac ity, queue Is 1he oretica9y infinile .
Qu eue shown is maximum after !Wo cycle s
I 951h perce ntile volume exceeds capaci ly, queue may be longer .
Queue st.own is maKimui .• after two cyC:es
Syn:.h ro 7 · Rcµo 1t
Pase t
•
•
•
Queues
2: Oxford Avenue & US 85 • '-. ., I t .2
Solils and Phases . 2. O<ford Avenue & US 85
•
• Bas rti nc
Existing Conditions-AM Peak Hour
4119/2Dli
1-o4
-1-Ai'i•:\~i:'i •i:.,r,.;J:f' :::..; ,.
1-.a
Sym:hro i . Rep JO
Page 2
Queues Existing Conditions-PM Peak Hour
2: Oxford Avenue & US 85 4119/2012
.> -~ f -' ._, t ,. '. ~ .' • LaneGrcue Eel: EBT,. . ESR WBL. IYBT wi!R NBL NBT NOR SBL SBT S8R
Lano Confi~urations 'l'I tt .,, 'l'I tt r' 'l'I ttt r' 'l'I ttt r'
Volume (vph) 245 34 1 313 233 441 263 238 1953 109 1~ 2560 122
Said . Flow /f'IO tl 343 J 3539 15~3 3433 3539 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583
FIIPerml~ 0.950 0950 0.950 0.950
Seid . Flow(pe im ) 3430 3539 1562 J41 C, 3539 1583 3402 5085 1562 3431 5085 1561
Said . Flow (RTOR)
Lane G1oup Flow (vph) 30, 379 ~, 2~ 1115 289 270 1993 117 i]ij liSJ 185
Turn Type Pro! r-iee Prol Free Pm! Free Prol Free
Protected Phasas 7 3 5 1
Penrltted Phases Free Free Fico Free
Total Splil (s) 14.0 21 .0 0.0 1~ 0 ,1.0 0.0 12.5 70.0 o.r 15.0 725 0.0
To1a1 Lost Tlmo (o) 5.0 6.0 4.0 5.0 ti .O 4.0 5.0 G.5 4.0 5.0 6.5 4.0
Acl Effcl Green (a) 9.0 1!,.0 120.0 9h 15 0 120.0 7.5 63 .5 120.0 10.0 66 .0 120.0
Actuated g,c Ratio 0.06 0.12 I.Oil 1.06 I~ :2 1.00 Q.<)6 0.53 1.00 0.08 0.55 1.00
vie Ratio 1.18 0.86 0 22 1 12 1.10 0.10 1.26 0.74 0.07 0.80 0.98 0.12
ConllolO..ay 159.7 70.7 0.3 137 .1 113.6 0.2 192.7 24 .0 0.1 74.6 40 .5 0.2
Queue Oel~y 00 0.0 0 0 0.0 ~-" 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 159.7 70.7 0.3 m .1 113.6 02 192.7 24 .0 0.1 74.6 t0.5 0.2
LOS F E A F F A F C A E 0 A
Approach Dela) 736 89 .1 42 .1 40 .6
Approach LOS E D D
Ouelle Leogth 5r,,. I ~) -143 153 0 ·136 ·209 0 -135 420 0 91 733
Queue LengU, Sor, ilt) #202 #235 0 ml188 mi3 17. mo 1216 480 0 #141 #888 • lnlemal link Dist (hi 625 302 825 625
T1.m Bay I ength (ft) 310 200 220 125 495 340 365 500
Base Capacity (vph) 25 7 442 '562 257 442 1583 215 2691 1562 286 2797 1561
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Splllbad< C3p Rcductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5torage Cap Reductn 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RedlJced vie Ratio 1.16 0.00 0.22 1.12 1.10 0.16 1.26 0.74 0.07 080 0.96 0.12
1n1 ... ectiori Siimm!!!l
Cycle Length : 120
1\CIU:Jied Cyelo Length : 120
Olbet: O (0%), Rclerenced to phase 2:NBT a,d 6·SOT, Start ot Yellow , Master lntorsecUon
Con~ol Ty pe. Acruatecl-Cocrcliaa te~
Ma1.lrn um v/c R.ttio : 1.26
tn·.ersect,on Signal Delay; 52 .2 lnleJSection LOS : D
Intersection Capacily Ull ization 94 .2% ICU Level of Servi co F
Analysis Pe nod (nm) 15
-Volume exceeds capacity, queue is lheoreHcally infinite .
Queue shown ,s maximum after t110 cycles .
R 95th peri:enti le volume exceeds capa dly, CfJeU& ma, be lonoer
0.1eue shown is ma ximu m after two cycles .
m Volume for 95th percentile queue Is mcterod by ups~cam signal.
8a;el 1ne ~ynch ro 7 . Report •
Page 1
•
•
• Bas e6ne
Existing Conditions-PM Peak Hour
411911012
Synchro 7 . RP.pnrt
Page 2
Queues Exis tin g Co nditio ns-AM Peak Ho ur L "xford Aven ue & Navajo Street 4119.'201 2
~ -~ f -~ ~ t ,. ~ l ., • une oroue EBL EBT EB R W8L w:,r wiiR -Nill NBT NBR . S6l SBT. SBR
Lane Configura tion s 'I tt I' 'I ti. 'I t, .;.
Volum e (vph) 210 31 2 11 5 8 38 7 10 193 159 34 1 41 58
Said . Flow (prct) 1770 3539 1583 1770 35 14 0 1770 1796 ) 0 163~ 0
At Permitted 0.360 05 16 0.707 0.990
Said. Flow (pe m,) ~67 3539 1537 95'l 3514 1313 1796 o 1695 o
Said. Flo w (RTOR) 15 1 7 24 72
Lane Group Flow (vph) 253 400 151 12 516 0 227 244 o 124 0
Tum Type pm +p l Perm pm+p! Penn Penn
Pro lo cted Phas es 5 1
Penn itteo Phase s 2 6 e 4
Total Splil (s) 12.0 24 .0 24 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 24 .0 24 0 00 240 2t0 0.0
To!al Lost Tlme (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 0 40 4.0 40 4.0 t o 4.0
Act Eff:1 Green (s ) 3E .3 34 .7 34 7 302 24.5 15.2 15.2 15.2
Aclu ated g/C Ra tto 0.60 058 0.58 0.50 0.41 0.25 0.2S 0.25
v:r.Ralio 0.46 0 20 0.16 0.02 0.36 0.68 0.51 020
Conlrol Del ay 16.4 9.4 6., 6.6 14.3 30 .1 20.2 9.2
OucuoDclay c.o 0.0 00 00 0.0 OC· 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 16.4 9.4 6.4 6.6 14.3 :lU 1 10.Z 9.2
LOS B A A B C C A
Approach Del a1 11 .0 14."i 25.0 92
Apploach LOS B B C A
Queue Lenglh 51),,· !fl) 100 71 1l 2 68 72 65 14
Que ue Length 95l (ft) m1 12 m70 m16 6 93 11 5 101 40 • Inte rnal Unk !l~t (ft) 302 425 425 405
Turn Bay Lengih (fl) 100 170 130
Ba se Capao ty (vph ) 56 1 2046 953 627 144 0 438 615 61 0
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 Ii 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback C~ Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Slorago Cap Red uoln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced ,Jc RaUo 0.45 0.20 01 6 0.02 0.36 0.52 0.40 0.20
ln iiiisediori Somm !!!):.
Cyd e Length: liO
Actuate d Cy~e Leng th . 60
Offse t: 6 (10%). Refere nced 10 ~hase 2:EllTL aM 6:M!TL. Sta.1 of Yellow
Control Type : Actua !ed-Cconl in ated
Ma rumu m vie RailO: 0.6S
Inte rsection SiAnal Delay : 15.2 Inte rsection LO5 · B
Intersection Cap acity Utili?.ation 52 3'11 IC U Le vel of Sel'lice A
"'1 alys ,s Pe riod (min) 15
m Volu me for 951h pe:ocn tile qucuo Is mc1c redb y u~strea m olg nat.
5':lits an d Phases . 7: Oxford Aven.c & NaV1'0 Street
f ., -a2 i m4·· ... ... ·-·· ·•--
12 , I 18 24 , I Ii 24 s I 1;, .,,. -La o5 o6
17 t ~,,, I i,' ... .. ,. • . ,.
-----------------· Basel 1no Sy nchro 7. Rer,cr1
Page 1
•
•
•
Queues Existing Conditions-PM Peak Ho ur
7: O><ford Avenue & Navajo Street 4119/2012
.,J, -• f -'-..._ t ~ '-. ! ~
La'ie:Gitiue EBL '·, -.e·at ,.,. Eeil ::: wilL •.,W!iT ; ;,Yii!R : NBl' . NBT· NBA•.·· sliL ,:ssl:,; .SBR
Lane Cmfig.,raLi ons 'I tt ,, "I tt. "I t. ,ft
Volume (vph) 95 364 187 63 504 8 Hi8 58 39 8 151 265
Said . Flow (prol) 1770 3539 1583 1170 3522 0 1770 1724 0 0 1681 0
FIi Pemilled 0.353 0.478 0.303 0.991
Said . Flow (perrr,) 656 3539 1546 889 3522 563 1724 0 1669
Said . Flow (RTOR) 243 5 52 159
L,no Group Flow (vph) 111 418 243 103 589 189 116 503 0
Tum Type pm+pt Perm pm+pl Perm Perm
P!olecled P\ase, 5 1
Permlllod P1:iso1 1 2 G 8 4
TotalSplil(s) 110 230 23.0 11.0 230 0.0 26.0 260 00 26 .0 26 .0 0.0
Tolal Losl lime (S) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0
Acl Eflc1 Green (s) 28.3 22 .B 12.B 28 .2 72) 205 20 ~ 20.5
Al:1ualed g/C Ra•io 0.4 7 J.38 0.38 0.47 0.38 0.34 0.34 0.34
v/cRalo 0.26 0 31 0.33 0.20 0.44 0.98 0.19 0 74
Conlm' Oolay 13 3 18 2 10.3 9.2 16.7 85 .7 BB 19.2
OJeue Delay 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0
Tolal Delay 13.3 182 1U.~ ~.l 16.7 85.7 88 19.2
LOS B B B A B A B
Approach Delay 15.0 15.6 564 19.2
Approach LOS B B E B
OJeue Lenglh 50th (fll 48 99 66 18 89 63 15 100
0Jeue lenglh 951ti (fl) m68 m131 m97 26 129 #172 ~4 193
ln,cmal Unk 0191 (h) 302 425 425 405
Turn Bay Lenglh (It) 100 170 130
Base Capaaly !•Ph) 440 1343 737 522 1337 206 665 713
S~rvallon Cop Roduan 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0
S~llb~k Cap Reduch 0 0 0 ( 0 0 0 0
s:orago Cap Rcducln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced vie Raio 0.25 0.31 0.33 0.20 0.44 0.92 0.17 0.7 1
lniefsaciioii Su riima!l
Cycle lengh: 60
Aclualed Cycle Lengln : 60
Olfsel · 50 (83'4) Referenced lo phaso 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, St,~ ol Yell ow
Con~,; Type : Adualed-Coord in ated
Maximum v:c Ratio : 0.98
lnlerseclion Signal Oelar 21 7 lnlerncrJ,on LOS : C
lntersecil on Cap3Cily UmizaLion 67 .8% ICIJ Level ol Service C
Analyss Penod (a,n) 15
# 95th percent de voiJme exceP.ds Cflpaci ty, queue may be longer .
Oueue show n is maximum after tNO cydes
m Volume !or 951h pcIcenlile queue ,s meleIed by upstream signal.
Baseline Synchro 7 . Repcrt
Page 1
Queues
~,.!'-venue & Navajo Street
Scl ilS and Pi&Je!S : 7. Odord Ave .,ue & Nevala S~eel
8ase t1n e
-•2
IA 2J 1I t ·;: ;-;i,:;.J, \i:'!.~.::,·~-:,;';: ·::: •: ·~~t:;.•.~:.'IJ::i'.:• ~1 .... ..
Existing Condi ti ons-PM Peak Hour
4/1il'2012
Ill
..
Syn ch ro I -Re port
Pago2
•
•
•
•
•
fl
Oxford Statio11
APPENDIXD
II FEI.SllURG
.,. I-I O L T & l U L L E\/10
Traffic I111pa ct Analysis
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS-BACKGROUND
COND1TIONS
Appemlix D
Ou rt ues Background Co nd~i ons -AM Peak Hour
2: Oxfo rd Ave nue & US 85 _,. -• {' -' ~
L,,1~e Giou~.: . : ESl;_,· EST. EBR WBL . WBT , WBR NBL -
lAne Configu ra tions ,,,, +t ,, '111 tt I' 'l'I
Volumo (Yp,'l) 165 37 0 140 100 260 Jl 5 225
Sall!. Flow (pro l) 3433 3539 1583 3433 3539 1563 3-133
Flt Perm itted 0.950 0.950 0.950
Sa id. Flow (perm ) 3394 3539 1562 3405 3539 1562 3-1 32
Said . Flow (RTal)
uine Group Flow (vph) 179 402 152 109 283 332 245
Tu m Type Prol Free Prol Free Prat
Prolecled Fh ... , 7 3 5
PHllllllted Fhase s Free Free
Total Spi t (s) 17 .0 31.0 0.0 14.0 28 .0 0.0 17 .0
Total Los\ Time Isl 5.0 6,0 4,0 5.0 6.0 4.0 5.0
Acl Effc1 Green (S) 11.4 21.7 :'iO .O 87 169 150 0 13.6
Ac!Uale d g/C Ratio 0.08 0,14 ', 00 J.06 0.13 100 0.09
vlc Rabo 0.68 0.70 t10 0 55 0 G3 021 0.79
Control Ool•y 81 2 73 ,1 0,1 TT ,4 62.1 0.3 64 .7
Queue Delay 0.0 C.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q,,J
Total Dela y BU 73 .1 0.1 77.4 62.1 0,3 64.7
LOS F E A E E F
Approach Delay 59.9 361
Approach LOS E D
Que ue Len glh 50th (ft) 89 201 (xj 122 122
Ououo Length 95th (ft) 131 257 B8 162 #205
lnlemol Un k Disl(II) 625 ))2
Tum Bay Length (ft) 310 200 220 t 25 495
Base Capacity (,ph) 275 590 1562 200 51 9 1562 310
S1arvation Cap Reducln 0 0 0 0 0 t 0
Spi llback Cap Reduc1n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stora ge Cap Reductn L 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rodu ood v/c Rono 0.65 0.68 0.10 0.53 0.55 0.21 0.79
lnleririctlon Summ-.'
Cycle ~englh : 1 frO
Ac!Uale<l Cycle Lengtt,: 150
Olfsol 63 (42',\), Refeie nced 10 pllase 2:NBT an d 6:SBT, Stan of Ye!low
Co ntrol Tyi:e : Ad\Ja led-Coor d,naled
Ma,imum vie Ratio 0.91
lntersActron S,gnal Delay. 38 .6 lnlftrsection LOS · D
lnlersa ctlon Ca paci ty U!hzaio, 84 .9% ICU l eve l o! SeNice E
Anoly>is Period (min) 15
# 95U1 ~-cunU:e '4ulum tt ti ~weds capacity, qut!ue may oo lanoer .
Queue 5ho wn 1s maltimu m alt~r two cycles .
Basc lirc
t ,. '-.
NBT NBR SSL . m I' ,,,,
2150 70 225
50!5 1563 3433
0 950
5085 1562 3431
2337 76 245
F1ee Pro1
1
Free
900 00 15.0
65 40 5.0
837 150,0 13,4
0.56 1.00 0.09
0.82 0 05 0.80
30,4 0,1 65,1
0.0 0.0 0.0
30.4 0.1 85.t
C A F
34 .5
t
665 123
730 #22•
62 5
3':0 365
2837 1562 308
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0.82 005 0.80
4119/201 2
l .,'
. $BT SBR
ttt I'
2365 175
5085 1583
5085 1563
2571 190
Free
Frao
as.o 00
6,5 1.,0
33 .6 '50.0
J.56 1.00
0.91 0.12
36 .0 0.2
0.0 0.0
36 .0 0.2
D A
37 .7
D
827 0
902 0
625
500
2833 1563
0 0
0 0
0 0
0,9 1 0.12
Synchro 7 . Hepon
Faye 1
•
•
•
Queues
2: Oxford Avenue & US 85
2: Oxford Avenue & US 85
•
• BRselme
Background Conditions-AM Peak Hour
4/1912012
~:1nchro 7. Repor1
Page 2
Queues Background Conditions-PM Peak Hour
2: Oxford Avenue & US 85 4119/2012
.> --. f -' 4-. t ,. '-. i .' • lane Groue. · . i:eL EBT . eait .. . WIil · WBT WBR .:)llili •··NBT NBR . . Sil! ,,sai SBR
Lane Configura tions 'l'I ++ r' 'l'I ++ ,, 'l'I tH .,, 11'1 +++ r'
Volume (vph) 255 350 325 240 465 270 245 2015 115 205 2645 125
Sala Flow (prnl) 3433 3539 1583 J.133 3539 1683 3433 6085 1583 3433 SOBS 1583
FIIPermillB<I 0.950 0.950 0.850 0.950
Sota . Flow (perm) 3404 3539 1552 3105 3539 1562 3433 6085 1562 3431 50B5 1563
Said . Flow (RTOR)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 277 3B0 353 261 505 293 266 2190 125 223 2875 136
Turn Type Prol Fr89 Pro! Free Pro! Free Prol Free
Pro1ec1ed Phases 7 3 5
Pennilted Phases Froo Free Freo rree
Talat Sp'.lt (s) 170 31 .0 0.0 17.0 31 .0 0.0 17.0 BS .0 0.0 170 B5 .0 ~.O
Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 40 5.0 6.5 4.0 5.0 6.5 4.0
Act E~cl Groen (s) 12.0 24 .2 150.0 12.0 24 .2 1500 12.8 79 .3 1500 120 78 .6 150.0
Ac1u•t·,d glC Ratte 0.08 0.18 1.00 0.08 0.16 1.00 0.09 0.53 1.00 0.08 0.52 1.00
v/cR.i ";IJ 1.01 0.67 023 0.95 0.89 0 19 0.91 0.81 0.08 0.81 1.08 0.09
Con1 , Dal3y 1n2 65 .3 0.3 107.5 n .1 02 1011 32 .5 0.1 89.9 77.9 0.1
Q:.,e., uel1y 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 1.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 00 0.0
Tn>,,: C,,.!lay 123.2 65 .3 0.3 107.5 78.1 0.2 101.1 32 .5 01 899 77.9 0.1
LOS F E A F E A F C A F E A
Approach Oelay sqs 63 .B 38 ., 75 .4
Approach LOS E E D E
Queue Length 50th (N) -10 185 0 137 272 0 136 61,1 0 112 -1 147
Queue Len9tt195th (ft) #143 243 0 m#l 86 m310 mO #229 705 0 #179 ~1222 • Internal Un,, 'sl (fl) 625 JOI 825 625
Turn Bay length (M) 310 200 120 125 495 340 365 500
Base Cepacity (vph) 275 590 1562 175 SM 1562 292 2690 1562 775 2664 1563
Slarvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Splllbadi Cap ReduC1n 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
S1orage Cap Red ucln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Rallo 1 01 0.64 0.23 0.95 0.88 0.1 9 0.91 0.81 o.~8 0.81 1.08 0.09
lnteiiec1ion Sum!!!J!a
Cycle Leng:h : 150
Acluated Cycle Leng\/1 : 1'0
Offset 24 (16'1,), Relerenced to phase 2·NBT and S:SBT , Start of Yellow
Control Typa: Acl\Jaled •Coordinal!!d
Ma~mum v'c Ra uo: 1.08
lnlersecton Signal Delay : 59.5 lnler>edion L:JS E
lnlerseclon Capacity Util~atio n 97 .11\ ICU Level ol Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
-Volume e1ce-~s capacity, queue is tn&oreli:aUy infiniti.•.
Queu e show11 is maxinum_ after two cycle~.
# 95th pe rcentile volume e1.ceeds capacity. queue 111a1 be lor•Jer
Uueu e sh uN11 is mctJ.ir1u1ri after two cydes .
"" Vo lume lor 95th percen•,ie queuo :: me tered by op stream sign~.
Hasel1ra Synchro 7. Report •
Page 1
•
•
•
Queues
2: Oxford Avenue & US 85
2· O><ford Avenue & US 85
Baseline
Background Conditions-PM Peak Hour
4/19/2012
Synchro 7 . Report
Page 2
Queues Background Conditions-AM Peak Hour
7 : Oxford Avenue & Navajo Street 4/19/2012
.,} -• ' -' " t ~ "" ! 4' • Lane Groue . EBL EBT E9R WBL 'MIT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SST SBR
Lane ConfigLratio ns 'I tt ,, 'I tl+ 'I l+ 4,
Volu:no (vph) 220 325 120 10 400 10 205 170 35 5 45 60
Sa id. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 15<13 1770 3522 0 1770 1808 0 0 1706 0
FIi Permitted 0.425 0.540 0.664 0 988
Said. Flow (perm) 786 3539 1533 999 3522 1233 181111 0 1689
Said . Flow (RTORJ 130 4 14 65
Lane Grnup Flow (vph) 23~ 353 130 11 446 223 223 0 ,19
Tum Type pm+pl ?(lf!TI pm+pt Penn Pe1m
Protected Phases 5 1
Pormlttod Phases 2 2 6 4
Total Split (s) 12 .0 36.0 36.0 11.0 J6.0 0.0 l/.U u .o 0.0 27 .0 27 .0 0.0
Tot.. Lost Tim• (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Act Effct Green {s) 46.7 41 .1 47 .1 42 .b J6 .9 17 8 17.6 17 .8
Acbia18d g/C RaOo 0.65 0.63 0.63 057 0.49 0.24 0.24 0.24
vie RaOo 0.39 0.16 013 002 0.2€ 0.76 0.51 0.26
Con~ol Delay 14.7 8.7 6.0 S.5 12 .6 42 .8 263 12 .2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 00 0.0
Total Delay 14 .7 8.7 iO 65 12 6 l2.B 26 3 12.2
LOS A A A A B D C 0
Approach Delay 102 12., 34 5 12.2
Approach LCS B B C B
Q:.w,uo Lenglh 50th (ft) 66 &5 21 62 96 83 20
Queue Lcnglh 95th (ft) m154 m91 m46 100 159 134 54 • Internal Link Dist (ft) 302 425 415 405
Turn S.y Length (fl) 100 170 130
Basa capacity (vph) 623 2214 1012 661 1736 378 564 563
Slarvabon Cap Reducln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sp!lback Cap Reducln 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0
Slongo Cap Reducln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.1 6 0.13 0.02 0.26 0.59 0.40 0.21
lnlerse,;tion Summir/
Cycle Longth: 75
Acrualed Cycie Lenglh : 75
Offset: 14 (19%), Referenced I~ phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTl , Slarl of Isl G, .. n
Conlrol Type : A:lualed-Coordinaled
Maximum vie Ratio • 0 76
lnlersadioo Signal Delay 17.1 lntorsection LOS : 8
lnlersection Capacity U~iza Uon 53.5% ICU Level of Ser\ite A
Analyol, Period (min) 15
rn 1'olu111e fo1 95U1 pt11ctt11Ue queue ls metered by ups1ream sig nal. r·-7: Oxford Ave11ue_!,_!i~~o ~treat
~~: r· : ~ k: ... : ~!"."~ ·. .4 ... l 1 1 -•• • Ji:j :,w .. -'' '.
Basel.ne Synr.hro 7 , Repo1 • f ago 1
Queues
7: Navajo Streel/Windermere Street & Oxford Avenue •
So'ils anj Pha ses : 7: Navalo Streel'l'/indermere Streel & Oxford Avenue
• Basell re
Background Conditions-AM Peak Hour
S/24/1012
_ I f:,,-4
,·-1120 '.■
■
Syrchro 7 . Raport
Page 1
Queues Background Conditions-PM Peak Hour
7 : Oxford Avenue & Navajo Street 4/19/2012
,,> -~ (' -' ~ t ,; '-.. ! ., • Lane '.Gioue EBL .. : .. ·EBT ~·: EBFC ; .Will WIil ._.;'',\SR ' . NBI.'.· NBT NBF( sli~• ... SST -:r-:-SSR
Lane Configurations 'I tt I' 'I tf. 'I f. .t,
Volume (vphJ 100 375 195 65 520 180 60 40 10 160 275
Said Flow (p-ol) 1770 3539 1583 mo 3535 1770 1738 0 0 1689 0
Al PermlHed 0.382 0.497 0.241 0.994
Said . Aow (perm) 70~ 3539 1533 920 3535 J4B 173B 0 0 1681 0
Said . Flow (RTORJ 212 1 43 112
Lane Group Flo·• (vphJ 109 408 212 71 570 196 108 0 0 484 0
Tum Typo pm•pl Penn pm•pt Penn Penn
Protected Ph::1se5 5 1
Pennlffed Phases 2 6 8 4
Tola'. Splll (s) 12 .0 36.U ~b.U 12.U 35 0 0.0 27 .0 27 0 o.c 27 .0 27 .0 0.0
To 1a: losl Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 40 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Acl Eflct Green (sJ 4t .8 35.8 35 8 41 .0 35.4 12.4 22 4 22 .4
Acluated r,JC Ratio 0.58 0.48 0.48 0.55 0.47 0.30 0.30 0.30
vie Ratio 0.22 0.24 0.25 012 0.34 147 020 0.83
Con~cl Delay 6.0 12.3 6.4 74 H2 273.3 134 33 .2
Otleue Delay 0 0 00 00 0.0 C.O 55 .4 00 2.6
Tclo! Oel•y 6.0 12.3 8.4 7.4 14 .2 328.7 134 35.8
LOS A B A A B F a D
Approach Dal•y 9.6 \:! 5 216.7 35 .8
Approach LOS A 6 F D
Queue Lengf/1 50th (fl) 14 145 92 13 90 -126 22 160
0J•u• Lenylh 95U1 (0) m27 m200 m146 29 rn, -248 56 #322 • lnlemal Link Dist (ft) 302 425 415 405
Tum Bay lenglh (tt) 100 170 1j 0
Bese Cepacily (vph) 511 1687 842 603 1667 137 563 593
Starvation Cap Red ur · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Splllbacl< Cap Redu , .. 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 43
Storage Cap Redu:ln 0 0 0 0 C, 0 0 0
Reduced vie Ratio 0.21 0.24 0 25 0.12 0.3' 1.56 0.10 0.88
1n1ersectton:Summ~.
Cycle langlh: 75
Actu•tad Cyde Lengf/1 : 75
Offset: 14 (19%). Referenr.Arl I~ phas• 2·EBTL and6:WBTL . SM cl 1st Green
Con rot Type Actu aled ,Ccorc naiad
Maxi'num 1J 1r Ratio . 1.47
lnte n cction ,>ignal Delay : 45 .8 lntersocliut , LOS . 0
lniersecllon Capacity UHliza llcn 69 .9% ICU lrwal cf Sel\1CC C
Anal/sis Per iJd (min) 15
-Volume exceeds capacity, queue is lheCYcUcally ,nn nll!!.
Queue shown Is maximum afler lwc cycles.
# ~51h percenMe vo·ume exooedscapaclly, queue may be longer.
Queue sh own is maxrnum afier two cycles.
m Volume for 951h percenlile cueue Is molered by upslre•m signal
Baseline Syn chro 7. Report • Pago 1
•
•
•
Queues
7: Oxford Avenue & Navajo Street
Sclits and Phases . 7: Oxford Avenue & Na'l.110 Street
f el __.o2
Background Conditions-PM Peak Hour
4/1912012
12 :11 <:.~ i ."•~ -.tJ.1 I __ .... ~-~~~!: ... ,:::,.~;: .. :• -.~·-::•.:·~ .... ~-i_~•·.r. .. : ~N.~·:.::.,·-;;.1: i :: .• :ti: -:-;1 n .:'f~\'.f' .. ~:-~::.fi:\', ".' ... :,,;•.~·11.~';,.1;:~~~:: ti
->.s ~.6 t .e
Base line
II
Synch ro 7 -Repo1
Page 2
Queues
7: Navajo Street/Windermere Street & Oxford Avenue
Background Conditions-PM Peak Hour
8124/1012
Said . Flow (pe;;,,)
Satdi,fffiW'(RTOR)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
.ftmi_T,~_lf '.1:~··: .. · ·P,ciec'.ed Phase!
~i?nase's·
Total Sol1 (s) rlifili!'asi,:trrMd,1 ·.
Ac! Effct Green (s)
t:..1Ualed'g,c-;-Ratio
vie Ratio
Con~laf' :
~w0Dela1
~!!\it!;P.).~y ·,•.
LOS
/>i!~qiQ~y
.A;,proach LOS eu.-w,tenaih,SOII\ (ft)
Queue Lenoth 951h (ft)
i~iemi!iJiili oi;i 1n1
T ,m Bay LBlglh (fl)
e .. ~:c.a~oiV;(vpli)
Slarvation Cap Rcducl n
spjLm;taii Reciuctn
Storage Cap Rewctn
~~v!cflatio .
~~~~{,)S~~~-n~lh 75 : .' :"">'.~ .... -::· '~ ..... _ .
Qt!P.!;.Q.(Q'.'!,):\ll!fJiriinced,.lp phase 2:l;QTL'@nd 6:Wl!!J;;§\;l!I 01,1,1 (i~!L • :-:.,:,_,'·'.·;.::.
Control Type· Aclualad,Coordinaled
iia)Jmlj'ffl "Vi2Ratio:'6.84 ·. ·. : :-.\~i? .-, : ... :<!·/!a:t.'}_:;.:~:_:~~/
lnler .. cllon Signal Deloy : 20 6 lnler,ection LOS : C
1[@~~2I~~~cj~)JtiliUltion69.~--~ _:·:.~::·y :,: ... 1CJLLj~_((q[~~£J:•,'.
Analysis Ferlod (min) 15
(Q~l!!'P!Li-iifi~i~.#lume excaeds e11pil_C\1y;qi.i,ui'rii~y)~i!9riger .;,;•: L • ·, ·
Queue shown 1s maximum after two cycles .
m. • v91_uilie _l?f 95th i>en:enlile queu_e ;~·me\e!'e\f ~y ui>ii{eajii_signa1.
Spli:s and P,ases : I N:1v~o StreetM'indermero Street & Orlord Avonuo
'fo1 ./.o21RI .__ oJ I ~•4
,J, .s
!"
Baseline Syncl':10 I· Report
Pago 1
•
•
•
•
•
O~ford St11tio11
APPENDIX E
•r'.illl FEL SllURG
··H O LT &
U LLEVI G
Tmffi,, T1111111rt Analysis
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS-WARRANT 3,
PEAK HOUR
.'lppL•,itlix E
<::c m-::c Cl
P~.: r,,0-u,r-z ...,c:o m3::D
"men ::c.,. ... 0 ...,,,
c:~~
:i, O""' -:,,. <n .;~
600
5 00
4 00
300
200
100
I
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
I
' !
' / 2 CR MORE L'\N ES & 1 LANE
I
I
-1 LAfl.E & 1 LANE
I
,--:::-....;;F==--+----1 1so"
~--+--+----+--+-__.j~-+--.----+--+-==+==-+-..:::ii===4-----1100* I
eS98,64 7E6,3S •
400 500 600 7 0 □ 800 \IOU 1000 11 00 120 G 1300 l<OU 1500 1600 1700 1800
MAJOR STREET· TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES -
VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
:;:: Nota :150 vph applies as the :ower thresho id volume for a minor st:-ee :
approach with t wo or more lanes and 100 vp h applic!; as th e tower
thres hold volume fo r a minor street approac h with one lane.
Appendix E
Warrant 3. Peak Hou r
•
•
•
Oxford St,1tio11
APPENDIX F
•r.l FE L5B UI\G
• H OL T &
U l.1.E\'I G
T raffic J 111pact A 11alysis
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS-BUILD-OUT
CONDITIONS
App c,uf;.r I'
Queues
2: Oxfor:l Avenue & US 85
Build -Ou t Conditions-AM Peak Hour
8124/2012
Synchro 1 • Report
?age I •
•
Queues
2: Oxford Avenue & US 85
Build -Out Conditions-PM Peak Hour
8124/2012 --t \.
V, 8
..f r.~;T~-:._ .~ _ ..
Actuato<I ycle Lenglh : 150
~t:i:f(,1~)1~89.fpfri,noc,d t9 'Phq,o 2:NDT orl'd. 6:~Br,_Siri~'Of:Vii~il \:~{It,j!•;i'.:°•\ : ...
Control Type : Ac1ua\ed -Coo 1dinatod
Maxurnim&.Y}CRaaQ:~;~o~~ ... ) ~:: · ~-.... .-· ;:,, ./ .• .,1 ;~: .. ·.-~: • .f.~~i:fii~.fl.::~.!!~-~~:~-\·
tntersec\on Sron~ Oolar 60 J ln\erseclion LOS: E in.i¥~J~'£\lii~_~:cmnioti.•~·01 2'11 · · ·,. ,. :'_:\,:•;; i;;'/ifQii~~m~T. ·
Anatr,iis Period (m:n) 15
::!:~yQ~~lffl '.C~~P.(!iga po,;ity:,qµeu e rs ~'qofoii~~ illfi~!i~?~-t -\:!.:·,) :,;\J:r}.\J.~~:.(i -
Quouo &hown is ma lO mum ofte r lwo cycles .
# ~:~~~).'~[~E.ti lit ·v~!U-1!',e u..:~s·capa~~; quflut:1 may ~-iOnget!; ·.: :.: ·_; ·:1/"i"-:j,;-.:_
OJcue shown is maiimum afte, two cydes
m -}19I~r,fe-for95 th'per'amtl1 0QueU8 1s f!1_ele r~d bY ufi~ir~in s·9ri~:_,;:::r :i:: ,--~ ·M
Queues
7: Oxford Avenue & Windannere Street
Spi ns and Phases 7: Oxfo,d Avenue & Windcnnerc S11ect
'fol ~~o1 1Rl
ers-1. .111-J;ffi li·
.,) ,5 • I Vo6 (Rl
••n• '
8.isdi no
Build-Out Conditions-AM Peak Hour
8/14/2012
~ ... ,4
■ 133, '·■
"'f ,a
·."I• 11
oync hro 7 • fiepa rt •
Page 1
•
•
•
Queues
7: Oxford Avenue & Windermere Street
Build-Out Conditions-AM Peak Hour
812412012 -t
•:49F ·'·. :f
·.;;gy .. i:::;~t:
0
:. -<,@ f)t·l;t
CY'ciiiifenf~,!Slii!tl}ff:tr-= ,-::::;:,i: 7-·~.,••1~i\!;1';1;1~~.h~L~?~~fi;.,~~1!·:;r'i'li}~~··':;,¥?;!1-~:f::::~:r.r,.,11 ····;¥ft:·f•·.~:-~•;,·~·;.i,::r.:~;•·r1~
Athialod Cyclo L&nglh: 75
(lfi"i!,'@ifI'&fl~ii.eli~ 10 pit~•• 21;~n; ajifs~~IW.§iiilii!~!j(G.\ii.ii~;:: ::; ,::i\/ii;~-;_;·,1v1·!,;;:"''·; . ,
Con~ol Type : Aclualad.CoOfdnal<rJ
Maxamum~vicRatlo?tfrr"J:_.·. :· ... -• :-.:.t~::r.;r~~1~;~r~l~i.E-tt~~'t't;~-f{t:~i1t~~,;-tt:.fi._/·
lnlorsecti on Si111el Delay 15 2 lnte1Set1 ion LOS: B
19Ut'r~~§·f~J[[taj?.il_Oll 56.3%. :.': /: .•.:~i\ti!Jt~nf~~j9_~~~V!JJ~..=_~_cfil3;~/(t,7~!(fr:. '"'.~-/-·.'{: .. -'.:
Analy~s Pe;od (m in) 15
m .. :.::v.Q!Q~}Q]~~Y'~rce~le qu eue is m0t8!~ bf~P..SJr~.ffi'~h~(~ ... '/;': ·-·. 1:i ~!f;,.:_:J!~~:~:t:•.· .;(.~:·7::-
Basc!!no Synch ro 7 . Re po 1t
Pog o 1
Queues
7: Navajo Street/Windermere Street & Oxford Avenue
Build-Out Conditions-PM Peak Hour
8/2412012
cY~.l!"~9tfi\7§iliW.Bt!1:1J~·;-.r~;;:,:;r:' :: t :.\ .\ -· ~ ti.:-t~.: : .. ·,,: -::~:;1·,i:;J~ ·-r~:·?t .}ftfr:-.:~~{J.~•~,;f~;:~;:,9.1,.~!'%~(f~l!.1.£\:;~1i:i~-;; :";?
Aciualed Cycle Lenglh : 75
Oltsef70(~-3j[~ii@F.'~(qiiiJti[2:EijTj:_ar.ci 6:WBll; '<''fol 1,1_ci~n,. ,,: . , ;-.
Co ntrol Type · Aclua ted-Cooraina lej
MaxI~1,rn·~t~ ~~~~:~fJ)~~i~·i'-:;;\': ~-:. ·
lnlcrsection Signal Delay · 23.1
lntei..cii_qn Capji:(ir.ii"~.~·.io:~q·i'!fK
Anolysis Period (m in) 15
VolU rrie ~Kee¼;_ f;aP.~ty ;Q~~)i.lhe~u~ly 1nfi1il!~.
~eue sh~~1 i.;.i:~r-:~~~!~Y~~-s. .. _
95th pe rceng1e:vo1~m.e ~~..!;~pa,tty: qu _eue may be longer.
Qu eue sh o-,,n Is maxlrr um alter two cydes .
m Volume fti !i,th P,ei~iiri/!f qiieyMs me ter~d Dy up·s~eam signal.
so1,1s and Phases . 7. Nav cio Streetf!Mnde1mcr.? Slreel & Oxford Avenuo
fol ~~o21RI ~1>-,4
s•a--,;,),HI lll2Ah;
~ •5 .I ~-6•Rt ~o8 ,, ... .t.,-r,
_ _,,
■'. ,-.r.
-r.l ..
■ •
•
•
Queues
7: Navajo Street/Wiridennere Street & Oxford Avenue
Build-Out Conditions -PM Peak Hour
8/24/20 12
C . >:t,i,1~m'/'"'·.,:•\·.~~.
Aaualed Cycle Length : 75
~1)f1~t.+i'.'~Ai¥.?if~:i:!il!t~:21e_n}~ry~Jw.8-TI:(sifii '¢J,1 i:ireen :'.i.'i ·. ';R,;:/1"HNlKd ~:;:;:<,i,:?\'7:C/ :;;;:·-~·:
~i~*~tit~◊t~1r~~rf!0j .. ~:}:/~·-~~~t~~~f~f[t(:i:~~·-!·. ~-... ~} -~· ;:~~:1.1:-1ti~·t,:;;1;:};-;~·l:-.-;· ._ .:· .. _ :.; vt;.-
lntersed lon Signal Delay . 20 S lnterscclion LOS: C 1n1~f1J9.~ .. ~~aP.~11tf:Q~1f~ij1rt]f'it~'./~/f.•··~fi?\:t f:/;:~)iG9:te:~1)lf Sef'iCE.·.c~; .'-:}:r~·}Ji;/f})f;'.r1't'\~.:-· ),~_··:t.·.:-:1~j~·
An:~!ys!s Pt:1 ~(111 i11) 1$
n, sstiii,eii:enii1e'.,01~m:e•e~~•~ii'.iig1i1 ci~~·•r.\ii.!Q51 ~, . ,
Queue shown is ma~mum after two cyaes .
m _. volufflO' bi-~9Slh"fer~Cii'tlii(q~_is"ff!~~Jed ~{~'P.!~il!'f~nlf "
Splits and Phases 7 Navajo S~ceW/indermere Steel & Oxford Avenuo
Base li ne Sync!JTo 7 . Report
Pag el
HCM 2010 TWSC
5 : Navajo Street & Site Access
Confl~ting Flow Raio -All 6-13 199 207
·::•·:.: .. f]~~~Y:!Jt1J~.~~fil~f~;;:;}~;Jf.'.·: ··:i;J j :-~J~: ·
Siege 2 444
F~IO~•.uliJ!~~y'.i},).-;;,7~,fil~:;. ··:.·: . J,i-1.~·-p _l&.
Pol capacity-I Manou,er 4~2 ~35 1395
···. Stiig,J..J.~-~j~:~\·;:;;\~'-~~::·,i•:·• f i.•:-. -~-.
Siege 2 6-16
,,me b!o_\:t(aj~OO<i9iii'il)t ' : ;-;~Ifi ' .. ·
Mov Cupacily-1 Maneuver 451
Mov Caii4cit/:?.l,l]iriji,~jf,,y_4~:,;.;
Stage 1 B&4
s1a9ii2 ''i ,· ;'&ft'·:
·, .1j .... · 13
93s° 1395 ., ....
Build-Out Condilions-AM Peak Hour
8/24/2012
~~N~i!(JRii!Nfl!il!ftEB@&'.~~BJi~~w,!.®j
Capi,:ily (vph ) 475
HtMCo'~U9rQfl~Y-M1.:':~; \~l:r.:::,·:('.-!~~s:.... ·. -_~:~·'.•;t.{1i.'.';-·-:F·; .. _t\ _,~r 11~X~!);7 t~~~);~·;.~Tr::.: :, .. •.: .; . -·:•·_:_?;
HCM Lane VC Ratio 0.002 0 161
HCMLan8 _lOS ~.\~·:_:,(·~ ::;.~~-~\~ --~-::-A· fD .:.B:·: • ... t :,, :·~~=~'J,::.;:,_:};".:.:
HCM 95:t> Perr.e n!~ Qieue (v,n) O 005 O 575
Ba seline Synchro 7 -Report
Page 1
•
•
•
HCM 2010 TWSC
5: Site Accoss & Navajo Street
Build -Ou t Conditions-PM Peak Hour
8'1412012
-----------------------·-··---·-·--------,--
.Conictlng Petb .(#lllr) 0.. . 0 0 0 0 0
~rr&1ro1~~¥D'~~~.fi}~!H:~gstop·1~~-~ · .;·:1~~~.sJgp~fiii~T~1~~~i:~!Jrs11i~t11-~F:~~u!~~ .. r~~-:~\::r-~~kL~~:~.~~
Righ i Tum Channolizod None None None None None No ne
S!~~~.6~ .. ~~1?:{i:;}~;;,t~O. ~ ... ::, ... :~~-~r Q.!\~ir~QD~zI~~1i~l:W~i:?~@'.[~;;~f:fY.flf~Q.~·~~:: :~\;?~if[-1~:¼!i[~~~~:
Mll<lianWidl/1 12 12 12 ~1T!t1;~flf~~~f.J~~J±!(:~~:::::.= ):, .~. :; .. ;~~~~~~~!~1~~~~4-'jr,~s¥'i~1~1[&~~~'.~~~;k~1;i~~1:~~:~t~1tt1P~@f~~t~.&i
HefYYJVen7aBS(.ij:~;:•fff1~:,!,~:ru::~2::•,~ · · · · ·; -~:r~.~~;:JI.1fm'i!:~J,·fil412'.~'g;fut~&;fft~~~~~~~~:~~~~:~?J~.t ~-'/·J;-:.:!~;!~~i:~{&,~i:~,11li
Movement Flow Rate 38 4 8 304 <S 1 70
NUOO;oi-lns'iS~J:;~ ~;n~?.~:fa1: :~. ~ ~~•-~·:.\ ~:-~~:~~~~f:!JM~\~~~~1~~{(.~;~;P:i?:1PK~~~.§;~':[~;t.~~-~~:[!l~~}~'.fif;l;;,~
Con!icting Flow Rat• . All · 806
\-~1ti~~-~!9~~,~1
, ... ,-1~1:·:&.':;r:Ltt9.~~:;; ..
Stage 2 320
Fci!9WT.u1(Bi~~iY,j\'i;,o,Zj i,•f51J :
Pol Capa<i1y-1 Man,..,ver 370
l ~ttfr:$~'J::1.J.:11:':~ IF •/:J 6jf ;
• Timebl!~ioon(ll)\'~··',!ifm ( . 3i ·:::'.,~ ;.;J~i; ~-:~t,~:lj,,j;f~,g~~J i:ft'~::\:r~·-.:,, '..::~:f·\!.:.· -.J~ '.
•
Mov.Capacity:1 Mar,..,,cr 367
t.tiii~~i>~ii'Jl!l~~": r:~:'t ~§F ·
729 1049
· .. '· t'.·:'.f:f.(: .. : \:t~\~qt\t;·.1~t1i!iJ/~.:/r /.-._.::: __ /Y ~~ .
Stage 1 • 689
. .:e.-\·i?:~-gi~~~~r;t:r.-~~~· .. ._ .:_:\Ji~:~',
lla~~@fti!fM~a'<i'JJ~NBT~~~.J~~
Cap'oc ily (vph) . 387
Ht~~GQQfOj:Qft.@W{~)'~i,f~:1i~~~"1\~~i&~~s1.;: =·: != •. ;i,~;/;JJ~:?ltjff~t?~~@·'.1~ff;;}W..ff~i\:1!t4tt{l".._..'··:tt?F~:~\~~/Sl:!/tf4il!
HCM Lane VC Ratio O 007 0 11
HCtJit '&n1e·i.:.os :.t?-":1·~~/•i~:1!;;~~:~-.-·. :. ·:-'~=A -~-/~:(t ~~_.;'~r:1;::/~-r~·-1::. -.~.f:~~:;·.;~1·t:·~-... ~.t~·.:.,:·'-'·· .;~,·-: ~-··.-~:1 .. , • .-• 't 1._; ·,:ii
KCM 95th Pcrcenti~ Queue (veh) 0.02 1 0.366
Base lt ne Syncnro 7 . Repo ~
Page 1
•
•
ORDINANCE NO .
SERIFS OF 20 12
BY AUTHORITY
COUNCrL Bn.L NO. 47
LNTRODUCED BY COUNCfl
MEMBER ____ _
A BLLL FOR
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE OXFORD STATION TOD PLANNED UNIT
DCVELOPMENT (PUD ). BY CAPITAL PARTNERS LOCAl ED AT OXFORD /\VE~E AND
SOUTH NAVAJO STREET . IN THF. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLOR A 00.
WHEREAS. LCP OXFORD LLC owners of1hc property at Oxford Avenue and South Navajo
Street, Englewood. Colorado, subm iltcd an ,1pplic;1tion to rezon e the propc11y from J.J (Lighl
Industrial 10 Pl anned Uni! Devel opment (PUD) 10 s ll ow residential and comme rcial uses: and
WHEKb\S, llu s propert y ha s been occupied by Martin Pl astics since 1920 and has bee n zoned
1-1 Lighl lndus1 ria l since being annexed imo the Cny of Englewood in 1970: and
WHEREAS , the Oxford Siation TOD is a 3.504 ac re si1e with 1hc proposed mixed-use
de velopment of res1den1ial and commercial use;; and
WHEREAS . !he Oxford Station TOD PUD will ch ang e !h e Pcm1i1ted Principal lse 10 allow
multiple unit resi dcn1ial. commercial and public use s: and
WHEREAS, 1he Oxford Stnli on TOD PUD proposes for -le ase apartments. associa ted parkins
and recreat 1001l facilities in a developmen1 desi.'!led tu benef11 from 1he adjacenl transit faci li1ie s:
and
WHEREAS , the Planning and Zoning Commissi on held Public Hearing on August 7. ~012 : and
\VH EREAS, the Plannin g and Zo nin g Commissior. fo u:vi that lhc proposed rezoning 1s
consis :cnt with the Comp reh~ns 1v r. Plan ; and
WllEREAS, 1he Oxfo rd TOD PUD has been modi tied 10 inc\,1de 1hc maximwn heigh! limita1io11
of 100 feel as recomm ended by 1h c Pl an nin g and Zoning Commi s>1ori:
NOW. TH EREFORE . BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNC IL OF TH E CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, CO LORAD O. AS FOLLOWS
Sec1ion I. The Oxfo rd S1a1ion TOD Planned Uni! Dc vclo pmcnl (l'UD), for prop ert y localed al
Oxford Avenue an d Soulh Nav ajo S1rcc1. in the Ci1 y of Englewood. Co lora do . anachcd her elo as
Exhibit A and lhe PUD Site Plan ana chcd heret o as Exhib it B. arc hereb y approved.
Ln1rod11ced , read in foll , and passed on fir st re ading on tl1c 4th day of Septe mber , 201 2
Publi shcJ by Title as a Bill for an Ordinance ia the City 's offi cia l ncwspa pct on the 7th day of
September, 2012 .
Puhlishcrl as a Rill fnr an Orrlinancc on rhe Cit y·, offic ial wchsire heginning on the 5th da y of
September, 2012 for thit1 y (30) days .
Rand y P Penn , Mayor
ATTEST :
I.N1C'ri sh1a A. Elh lo , Ci1 y Cle rk
I. Louc,ashia A. Ellis , Cit y Clerk of the Cu y of Englewood. Colorado , hereby cert ify 1ha1 til e
above and foregoing is a ln1e co py of a Bill for an Ordinan ce, intrud uced , read in full , and pas sed on
first re ading on th e t1h cl ay of Se ptember , 20 12.
Loucri shi a A. Ell is
•
•
OXFORD STATION TOD
LITTLETON CA P ITAL PAR TNERS
~ , ... r:i ,..,r.,,• ,..,.,.,
,!,---,..,_,
" .";",a."-,:!•·
,. •~•U•"'II 1-c.•,~,11>" ..
.HUMr
·PHRlliS '
•POLI
All'"'11CTS
•
1 ol 3
.····· .... _, .................. .
.......... ··. :···:···---··-·
····-·.·•·"· ··· ___ ........ .
OXFORD STATION TOD
LITTLETON CAPITAL PARTNERS ,,"''•""'r, .• ,·,., .. ,
·-·· ;,:;:1 .. .-• ... ;.
.. -... , ... ., ...... . r:····. ······· --~·:. -· --
""•'<DV">' -~•• r,,,..,..
HUM
PHRIES
POLI
~~CTS
2 ol 3
•
. -
OXFORD STATION TOD
LITTLETO ~~S:'.':~LT.,-'.'-t~ART NERS
... . ' \ \I , ..
' ' I
r.,rc,;n1.r~·or11
''° ,,-,u_•o,,,;~-.-._
<'1",1'["~
H "-',..C.llv,,tr ,..·.·4-1 _,. .
• ·HUM
PHRIES I POLI ~ns -.~.:::·: . .-;,,:-_';"c.-~
•
3ot:'I
OXFORD STATION TOD
LITTLETON CAPITAL PARTNERS
' ' ! T
~:;.~.-=-
.::..::-.: ..
...... _ ... ···
,1,rJ.'lfJ~Toll,'lf, ·~
'"'\;~~~11 ••-m· 1 ~
• tt.'lt1
,POLI
~~~-·
~~..;.·•·;:." ··:!;;.::..~
•
1 o! 8
•
•
OXFORD STATION TOD
LITTLETON CAPITAL PARTNERS
.. ,Al \,,,IC .. .J,',
·--._
('
[ '
.. \______.J i.c.11-i-\ ;----~
.Jc -
---'.f
.'· I ;. · .. ·· •. ·\
·-~.:.:: .. -c.c c:':: -"£-1
---.-_,
J
C"Olt?cl;""t•I l
.,,n~, .... " I ":::·.~.: .. .
• tt.'lrtl
POLI
AROl-~TICTS
:: _··.~.~. -·:· -·
•
2 of 8
OXFORD STATION TOD
LITTLETON C~f.'ff ~L PARTNERS
--------
j =':--~:r
:K.::•-
OXFORD STATION TOD
LITTLETON CAPITAL PARTNERS ....... ,,, ...
I
-----._ l -----4 , -.... ...
I
"· ~-;
-·~. '· .. . _. ·-· j =·"'·:-:i=··· . -
:,: [:::
,.:
• HUM
PHRIES
-POLI ~:::~
OXFORD STATION T .O.D.
LITTLETON CAPITAL PARTNERS
l'Vf,~rt J I I r,~.\ .......... , • .. . . -.. ~ ... ::...:.=-:·.: -. ·--·-•· . ~-
OXFORD STATION TOD
LITTLETON CAPITAL PARTNERS
-.. _,:;~:..~:,;-;,,., ... ·-. -
OXFORD STATION TOD
LITTLETON Cf.'-~.\T~L PARTNERS
·r.st:
"::···".~
I
I
• COUNCIL COMMUNICATIJN
Date: I Agenda llem: Subject:
Sep t ember 17, 2012 I 11 a i Ordinance Va ca,i ng th e 3400 Block of
S. Cla rks on Stree t
Initiated By: I Slaff Source:
Cornmunit y Dev elopment ,\Ian While, Jirecl o r
COUJ,;CIL GOAL AMO PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Th e poten ti al vaca1io n of S. Clarks on Str ee t wa s discu sse d w it h C raig H o spi ta l rep resen ta ti ves at the
Augus t 6, 20 1 ~ Study Ses sion . At th e stu dy session, C u unc:il conse nsus wa~ fo r C rai g to proG?ed
w ilh th eir expansion plans that in cl ude th e va c,Jlion of Clarks o n S1ree1 right -of-wav. Co uncil also
want ed Crc1ig to co nduc t a neighbo rh oo d mee ting, a reco mme ndat ion fr om t1e Pl anni ng an d
Zo11in s Co11 11 11b)io11, d i HJ fur CuunLil lo cu11duLt J µuUl iL h~.u i11g J ) µ,.H"l uf tl :e ur c.Ji11 ;11ice adopt i::m
process.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
• S1aff reco mmends ado pIion of Ih e Cu.mcil Bi ll vaca ti ng the 341J O Bl ock 0 1 5 . Clark son Str eet o n firs t
rer.ding. St,1ft iurthPr rPrn:-nm e nrl ~ 1h c1 1 Cnunril set O ctober 1, 20 12 ~1s th e pu bli c he;1 rin e to
consid er tes tim ony o n th e propose d righ1-oi-way va catio n
•
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Planning and Z o nhg Cornrnis~i o n disc usse d th is reques t Jt .J public m eeting on Augus t :::!B, 20 12.
The Commissi on rec omm end ed approva l of 1h e reques t with th e fo ll owing conditi o ns:
1 . Th e tl µµroplidle ~ti~~111 e11l (~) ~:1c1II U~ 1e~e1 ved iu r th e IJe ndit o f the Cit y and o l her ut ility
suppl iers so lhJt suffic1e111 ac cess lo ut ilities w ill be p rovi ded.
2. Th e Ci ly bicycle ro ut e o n S. Clar kso n S1ree1 shall be reta ined .
J. Lra ig Hos pit al re pre se ntat ives will co ntinu e to work with City stan to fi nalize and imp lement
recununende d signage, p~1r king ,1 nd pedestr ian c ros!i mg im provement!. .113 ,cc d to be tween
th e C il \' a nd Craig Hospital.
4. Craig Hos pital sh all be responsi ble for costs ass oc-ated w ith modi~•ing th e art sh ullle bus
rou te.
5. Th at th e City wo rk close ly w tlh th e ,1pplic ,1n t and ,1 ,;;p,:)cif i1 ;inrf mp,1,;;11r.1hl P ,Hl rl ri Pfined
tr aiii c plan ht.· put 1111 0 place 10 add ress be th traiiic Oow ,1.nd s.1fe 1y and pede str 1,1n cro ssmg
iss ues m th e ar ea .
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IIJENTltltu
Representatives of Craig H o spital approach ed City staff sevcr;:il months ago ..1b o ut th e potentiJI
c losure o f S. Clarkson Stre et b etween G irar d ar ,d Hampden Avenues 10 accommodate" plan neu
ex pansi o n of th e hospital. Community Dev elopment, Publi c Works, Utilities, Fi re , Po li ce and
Bu ilding dnd Saf ety staff have b ee n involved in m eet ings c o nce minB th is issu e .
raig's p ro posed ex p ansion m ee ts ;ever al needs o i the Hospital as explai n ed m t he att ach ed le n er
from RTA, C raie's ron'>uhin g ~r chitP C:I!-. ior thP expansion . Options for exp.rn si o n at th e c urrent
loca ti o n are limited .
Pri rnary con cerns wi th th e vilcati o n and subs eque nt closure incl ude th e impa c t on em e rge ncy
vehicle access and response tim es to Swed ish H ospital , impac ts nn nnn-P.mPrge n cy trnffic ;rn d
Lir culat iu n p<1t1e 1ns in th e ar ea, a nd h o w th ose veh ic ula r impacts mav im;:,act p edest ria n
movem ents and sa fe ty m th e area. Cra ,g prepared a traffi c study to add ress these concern s.
Th e traffic s tudy has been re viewed b y Public Works D epartmen t an d Fire Departme nt st aff
membe rs who ha ve irnJi ca te U tht!rE.' c11 e n o !l ignifit.dlll iss u es with ti1 e clos u,e o ( Cl.irk sc 1. Traffi c
im p.Jets Me m anageab le. h o 1.·veve r, some o l th e d e tails oi th e proposed mit1 g,,11 o n m et1s ures
(sign age, etc .) require iLirth e r d i!-Cll<is i nn
Th e recentl y designated 5. C larkson bicycl e rou te will be re tained throu gh the dustd street. Th e
eas tbo,;nd a rt shuttle rou te w il l n ee d to b e :n od iiied 10 1r.1vel north on Em erso n (inst ea d of
C lark so n ), then w~s t o n Clarkso n to a stop a C raig Hosp it al. Fr om there, the r o ut e re rn .:1 ins th P
~rt111e . Crd1g h.i s com m itt ed to absorbing th e cos ts of moving stops an d printing new ro ute maps .
Cra i g H 0s rital anrl Swedis h M ed :ca l Ce nte r ar e co-ap p li ca nts fo r th e vaca ti on req u est. If ap pr oved
by C o un cil, own ers hip o i th e ri ght o f-w,,y would re1.•e rt to th e adj ,1c en t 0\\'ne rs, Cra ig and Swed ish,
with th e n ecessary u tility easem ent(s) reserved to the City onU utli~r utility provide1s. Acc e 5s would
still be ava ilabl e to th e Sw edish pa rk i ng g.H,>Ae o n Clarkso n . The Ci ty would n o longer be
responsible fo r m a inte nan ce.
~ath er tha n a blanket case m ent b ein g reserved fe r utiliti ., and emerg ency access, C raig is
prnpnsing t o rese rve specific ease m en ts to utility p ro\'iders in o rder to p rovide areas for fu tu re
pl antings in th e v.:ic.1t c d right-o i -w .1 ','. M.in)· utility com pani es w ill no t all ow th e p lac e m ent of tr ees
in easements and tr ee~ ar~ .. u: i111p o rt ~111t de11 1e 11t u f the p,op..:J sed p a,~ a,ea 10 b e dev eloped in th e
vaca t ed rig ht-of-way. Th ese ea~e m ef'ts w ill b e d ed ica ted by sepa rate de ed a11t er th e rrg h t,o f-war is
vac ated.
f"h e t ng l ewoo d Mu mc1p (1I C ode co111 a ir ~s n o fo m :a l pr ocess for vaca t ing right s-al-way, Qn ly for th e
di sp os iti o n o f City p ro p ert y. Other th a n fo r park p ro perty , dispos ition of p ro p er!\• requires approval
of ,.1 11 o rdin,:m ce by City Cc u n ci l. Council requ es ted 1ha1 Cr,1 i g conduct a ne ighb orh o od m eetine
and also re4ut:!~t ed a rec.:urnme 11d"u iu 11 b~ l u rwd1d ed fro111 11,e Pl,mru n ~ ,ind Zoning C o mmissi on.
A n eigh b orh o od meetin g \-.:as helrl o n A uu u st '? :;, 2()12 ~, l rr1ig Hn,pit,11 . Not rs of th at meetin~ are
in cluded c1s an att achmen t to thi s c ommunict1 ti o n .
•
•
•
•
•
•
FINANCIAL IMPACT
If th e vaca ti on is approved, th e cos t of maintaining th e one bloc k of right•o f-wa\' wil l no longer be
borne by :he Ci ty . ·1 hes e costs include periodic repairs, sweeping and snow plowing. Craig and
Swedish would be responsible for whatever maintenance occurs. Beca use the pro pe rty would
reve rt to private ownership, it would be combined with th e adja c ent parcels on th e tax rolls and
would be subjec t to property taxes.
Va ca ti o n of the righ t-of-wa y will facilitate expansion of Cr.1it: Hospital a: its current loca ti o n. If
cons truc ted, the Ci ty would collect one-lime revenu es of building use tax; furniture. fixtures and
equipme nt us e lax ; and bui ldi ng perm ii fe es on the estimat ed $70 milli on project.
Craig has committed to absorbing the costs of moving stops and printing new route maps
Jssoc1ated with the modifica ti o n to the art sh uttle route.
Future improvem ents, !,Uch as p edestrian li gh ts, b enc!1es, str ee t trees and o ther amenities within th e
,acated right-o i-way would be paid for b\' th e la ndowners.
Emp loyment ,11 Craig Hospital is approx irn alely 576 full time equiva len l em ployees and ~00 part•
lime and on-call staff. In addit ion to staff, fa mily an d visitors of patients undoubtedly visit res taura nls
and businesses in th e area , resulting in a positive economic impac t t o th e Ci ty .
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Letter from RT A
Draft Campus Si te Plan
N~i~libv1h uvJ Meding Nutt:::.
Planning and Zonin g Commission Memorandum
Plannin g and Zoning Commi ss io n Minutes
M em orandum fr om Fir e Chi ef Patt arozz1
Memorandum From Public \.\fo rks Conc erning Accide n ts
Lett ers and Ernails fr om Resident,
Co un cil Bill
e ■ SMITHGROUP JJR
•
•
Vacation of Clarkson R.O. W. for Craig Hospital
August 10, 2012
History of Craig:
Since 1956, Craig has treated nea~y 29,000 palienls with SCI and TBI, and has treated more
patlenis with SCI than any other single facility in the U.S. At any given time Craig has
approximately 55 inpalients with SCI and 30 palients wilh TBI, for a total of approximalely 450
inpatienls per year. and 3 ,000 outpatienl discharges per year. Craig is regarded as a premie r
nalional center of excellence in the mar1<etplace and each year patients and families come to
Craig trom 47-48 states. Craig has been ranked t,y U.S. News and World Report for 23
consecutive years . Craig is accredited by Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare
Organizations (JCAHO), and has twice received the prestigious Magnet® Recognit ion-in 2005
and 2010 .
The Craig campus consists of two in patienl hospital buildings with 93 licensed beds, an
outpalient clinic program, a PEAK Cenler Wellness and Fllness Center, a 47-unit Family
Housing and Outpatient Housing fadlity. and a 3 story parking garage. Craig has app roximately
576 full time equivalent staff, and approximately 200 additional part-time and on-call staff .
Craig Hospital -Expansion Project Scope:
The purpose of this major project is lo ensure Craig Hospital remains a top level care prr>vider
with cutting edge facility capabilities and amenities lor P1tients and Family members. Craig is
recognized as a Wend Class Care Rehabilitation .;enter of Excellence which requires ongoing
development and upgrades to stay competitive in the national and international mar1<eta . That
said, adding more beds is not the goal or outcome for this project. Instead, moving lo all Single
Occupancy Rooms, rearranging organizational relationships throughout the facility, increasing
the program space for Outpatient Therapies, PEAK rehat,ilitation, and allowing an departments
to expand staff and wor1< areas are the focus . These revisions and additions will allow the staff,
patients and family members lo experience even better care, more controlled fadlity
environments and accommodations that help remr>ve the stress of serious rehabilitation .
Existing -85 bed, 215 ,ooo SF facility
New Addition -91 bed, 300,000 SF facility
Remodel 110,000 SF as part of this p: JJect
l ''010l2',1QOt C,algMow'~C--Doo.fflll'IISWac.-f¼rl1~ .. ,~1alltW\ooc
IMIPN\"M~l2t-60G:14l,I
fl.T .A.,lne .
19 S Tejon Slrvel. Sulli 300
Colorado Springs , CO 80903
ph 710◄71 •756(1
hc71D~7H174
RequHt for Vacation of tho Clarkson Flight of Wav between Girard and Old Hampdan •
Avenue
Jult flcatlon for Vacation Requaat:
1. Palient, Family and Stafl pedestrian safety -
a. Extremelv high number of Disabled pedeslrianNehicle conflicts dally
i. 647 vehicles al AM/PM peak timas (Mid-block)
ii. 153 pedestrians crossings al AM/PM peak limes
many in wheelchairs (Mid-block)
2. Unification ol Craig Hospital Campus
a. Severely reduces hospital organizational efliciency
b. DMdes this major hospilal campus in hall
3. Strengthening of the New Medical District Boundaries
a. Unify Swedish 600 stall parklng garage with main campus
b. Plenty of off street parking for all so no impact to nelghbomoods
c. Reduces overall PedestrlanNehicle exposure for enttre district.
d. Eliminates casual traffic !hrough the Medical district.
Potential Mitigation of Closure Impact on E.margencv Vahlcla Routes:
We have had and w ill continue to have Swedish Leadership and Emergency
departmenl, Englewood Fire Department and EMT services all heavilv involved
in design decisions relevant 10 this closure. These meetings have resulted in the
following potential mitigation aclion items which will be further evalualed by staff
and Craig representatives.
1. Eliminate parking on Wesl side of Emerson between Girard and Old
Hampden Avenue •
2. Eliminate parking on South side of Girard between Emerson ana Swedish
Central Utlli~· Plant
3. Provide conlraVcame1a Fiber Conduit from Broadway to the intersection of
Old Hampden Avenue and Logan
4. Improve the 3 pedestrian crossings on Old Hampden Avenue between
Clarkson and Logan with lighted pedestrian crossing signage.
5. Add emergency vehicle remote control of intersection lighting at Girard and
Clarkson
6 . Reduce the mien.action width at Clarkson and G irard to reduce Pedestrian
crosswalk distance
7. Provide revisea signage at Emerson/Old Hampden Avenue, ClarkSon/Old
Hampden Avenue, Clarkson/Girard, Emerson/Girard 10 provide clear
weytinding to the Swedish Hospital Emergency Entrance.
L'U-.'\l l ;t\l:ICl.l&CIIIQMOIIICIIA~IGl!~luc•OOO-:•"J-tD'l"'OltO' .. YJ,11'\ll'al'Of'llOC
L.u11,1•-'ll'rXl•a•.•coo,.,..
A.T,J,lnc. •
, 9 S. T ejor Street S\llte 300
Colorado Spmg,, co 80003
ph 71)-471-7566
h.718--471-\174
CRAIG EXPANSION PLAN
ru1u,11 8 0 ,IH Pl,mt
St,111 (lllOJU,~•
&6111 ,lc ns
I
r•ewr>111,ent
lnh111n<I'
, •• Nc-w •I ' lloo "l•lstm9
j .. • .. 11 New 4 !i t o, ~ lh l ,,,,.,,.
•• I
I ,--------~
1 Yl1Uur ,nd OUIJM\ln11
, P,ullm9k11
•
•
Meeting Notes
Craig Neighborhood Meeting
August 25, 2012
Request: Vacation of 3400 Block of S. Clarkson Street Right-of-Way
30-35 res iden ts of the area w ere in allendan ce .
Issues and con ce rns ra IsecJ at th e mee ting we re:
1. Alt ern at ives for hospital expansi o n if Clark so n isn'I closed. Vacant pa rkin g lo ts in the
area eas t oi Cr aig's c urrent buil di ngs co uld be use d .
2. Instead of clo sing Clark son, use th e overpa ss with elevators o r provide a tunn el fo r
tra ve l between the two b uildings. Look at the poss ibility of p rovidin g a mid-b lock
ped es tr ia n cross ing wi th a pedes tri an-ac ti va ted sign al like ,,t the M ,1 ll ey Ce 11te1. It w as
~1en iioned thi s was explored in th e past w ith th e City .
3. Conce rn ex p resse d about em e rg ency and 11 o ll•t>lller ge n cy acc e ss to Swe di sh.
4. Clark so n is a snow ro u te. What happens to thi s designa ti o n if C IJrkso n is closed?
5. Clarks on is one o f a few no rl h /so ulh s1ree1s p rovi ding access to Hampd en. Loga n,
Downi ng, and Broadway ar e other north/so ut h slreets, but are avo ided beca use o f
traffi c levels . Cl arkson is an importa nt con nection for 1h e neighborho od. Cu1ti11 g off
ano1her str ee l in th is area oi Englewo od wi ll acid to th e rr 11.e tha t has b ee n cre .. ted .
6. Concern about th e impac ts to o th er streets in the area. 647 cars usi ng Clarkso n in th e
pea k hour w ill go so m ewhere. O ld Hampden can 't handle curr ent traffic, let alon e an
in crpase .
7. There is a parki ng problem with ve nd o rs and staff parking o n ne i ghbo rh ood str ee ts,
partic ul ar ly Em erso n. Nei ghb o rs wa nted to know th e process ior institutin g permit
park in g in a neighborh oo d
8. raig sho uld c,pa nd 011 vacant parkin g lots to th e eas t. Maybe Craig has o utg rown th e
area ,ind sho ul d loo k elsewhe re ior expansion.
9. Q uc!,li u 11 !, ,1liuul til e dld 11 ge!, o r i111 pr uve 111 e11 b b t1i11 ~ prupo~ed on rt eighbu rin g str ee ts
to rniti ga l e th e im pac ts o f disp ersi11g th e Clark so n tr affic.
I U. LJis cu ss 1on abou t wh.il th e Ci tv rec eives 111 re tum fo , closing th e ;tr ee !.
11 Res ide nt s wa nted to kn ow about th e City's plans fo r sid e str ee t s 111 the are a a .. d th e
tr affic plan i o r th e entire area. Co mm ent s were ma de th at fu rth er study is nee d ed .
• 12. Crai g sho uld look at o ther alt erna ti ves to clos i ng Clark so n, such as cl os ing G irard .
•
•
•
M E M 0 R A N D u M
CO MMU l\:I TY D E V E LO PMENT
TO: Pl.in ning and Zo nin g Co mmi ssion M ~mbers
FROM: Alan \\'hit e, Co rnrnunit y Deve lopment Director
DA TE : Augus t ~8 . ~O 12
SUBJ ECT : S Clarkson St reet Vacation of ROW Req ues t
Representatives uf Cr,rig H os pit,,I ,lµpru.idred Cit y ,t.rff seve ral 111u11th, ago .rl,out the pote nt ial
closur e of Clarks on Str ee t to accommodat e a plann ed ex pansion of th e hospi tal. Co rnrmmit y
Devel opment, Public Works, Utilities, Fir e, Poli ce and Build in g and Safety staff have b een
in vo lved in m ee tings co nce rning thi s iss ue.
Craig's propos t>d ex pansion meets seve ral nee ds of th e Hospital as exp lained 111 th e attached
lette r from RT A Archi tec ts, Cra ig's co nsultant for th e expans ion . Vacating th e ri gh t-of-w..iy l o
acco mmod.Jt e th e ex pan sion of th e Hosp it al benefits th e City as well. Expa nding the current
ca 111 pu s retai ns this na ti onall y renowned hos pital and th e assoc i.it ed emr,l oy ment wi thin th e
Cit y oi Englewood. O ne-tim e building use tax on the expa nsio n is a cons iderab le source of
reven ue for the Ci ty.
Prim ary co nce rn s with th e vaca ti o n and ~ubsequent cl os ur e include the im pact 011 emerge ncy
vehicle acces s and response times to Swed ish H os 1>ita l, impacts o n non-eme r ,iency tra ffic and
ci rculati on patterns in th e area, and hn w th os e vP hicular impa cts rn ,1y imr,ict perlPslrian
move ments and safe ty in th e area. Craig p repar ed a tr affic stu dy to add ress thes e conc erns.
The traifi c stu dy ·,a s been rev iewed bv Publi c Work s D epar tm ent and Fir e D epa rtm ent c,ta ff
membe rs who have indic ated th ere are no significa nt iss ues w ith th e cl osure of Clar kson.
Traifi c im,M cts are man age able, howeve r, so me o f the de tails of th e p rop ose d rnit iga t,011
measu res (signage. etc.) req uire further dis cussi on.
,\ fo rm al appli ca tion to vaca te th e Clark so n ri ght -of-way betwee n G ira rd and Ha .,1pd en
Ave nues has bee n rece i·:ecl . Cr Jig .rn d Swed ish ar e co -app l icant s. If approved by Co uncil ,
own ership of the right-of-wa y woulrf rPvP rl to th P arlja ,Pnl o wnPrs, r raig anrl SwPrlish , with l hP
nece,s .uy util i ty ease rne nl (s; rese rved l o th e City and o th er utilit y provid ers. AccPss would i.lill
be availabl e lo the Sw edish pa rki ng garag e on Clarks o n. The City woulrl r,o longer b e
respo nsibl e fo r mai nt e nance.
·n,e rece ntl y designat ed S. Clarks o n bi cv cle route w ill be retained ttir ough the clo seJ str eet.
Th e eastbou nd ar t sh uttle route w ill need to b e mo clifi ed l o t rave l no rt ;, on [merson (instea d of
Clar kso n ,, th en wes t on Clark so n to a sto p al Cra i g Hospi tal. h orn th ere , th e route rem ai ns the
same. C r,1ig h,1~ Lu 1111 11 it1 eJ tu JIJ~urlJi11g th e LU~b of moving stops .1 nd plinting ne w rou te
maps.
The Eng lewood Municipal Code con tains no formal process fo r vacating ri ghts-of-wa\', o nl y for
the dispos itio n of City pr op erty. Other tha r: for park propert i•. d ispositi on of property req ui res
aµpruv.il uf dll urui ru ru:e by City Cuurrcil.
While Craig is sti ll in th e ea rl y pha ses of d esign and fund rai si ng , ;:,ur suing th e Vilca ti o n of th e
right-oi-way adds certainty to l11err planning and fund r,1is In~ eff orts. At th ei r stud y sess io n o n
August 6th , Co uncil co nse nsu s was fo r Crai g 10 proceed w ith th eir expansi on plans that
irrdud e th e vac:Jtion oi Clarksurr Str ee t right -of -wJy . Cuu11cil ,tb o w,111ted Crai g tu cu rrclu ct a
neighborhood m ee tin g (sc hedu led for Auglrs t 25 ' '), a reco mm en da ti on from th e l'lanning and
Zoning Co mmissi o n tno t at a public hea rin g), an d ',, Cou nci l to co nduct a public hea rin g as
pa rt of the ordinance adoption p ro cess.
St ai( is see kin g a recomm endation fro m th e Co111111 1~~iu 11 Lo11 ce mi11 g tl 1e right •u f-\>\'LI V vc1Lt1 li u11
requ es t submitted by Craig and Swed ish .
Staff Recommendation :
Slaff recu 111111 t,111.h furwJrrJ i11 g d reco 111111 enclo1ion l o City Coun cil to ap p rove the \"aca ti o n o f th e
5. Clarkson Street right-of-way b etwee n Girard and H,1 mpde n Ave nu es with th e following
co ndition 5:
I . Th e approp ri ate ease me nt (s) shall be reserv ed for th e bene i it o f th e City a.,d o th er utilitv
suppli ers SU Iii.t i su [fi ci e11l ,r LLt,SS tu uliliti e, will u e p1uviuet.l.
Th e City bicycle route on S. Cla rk so n Street shall be retained.
3. Craig Hosp ital represe nt ati ves w ill continue to work with City staff to finaliz e an d implemen t
recommen ded signage, park ing and pedestrian cross ing improvements ag ree d to b etwee n
the City and Crai g Hos pita l.
-I . Cr,tig Husµit,tl slrJII ue re s1iu11 ,ible for cus ts ,r »uci.rt et.l with 111ur.Jifyi11~ tire .t rt shulll" l,us
route .
1\t:<1 chm e nt s:
Leit er fr om RT A A rchitects
Memorandum fr o m Fir e Chief Pattaro zz i
Memnr;inrlum Frnm Public \i\/or~~ \nnrprnin g Arcirirntc.
Draft o f Camp us Si te Plan
Email from Br ays
Lett er from Becke rs
1.ett er from Buthman
•
•
•
•
•
•
Pl annu1s an d Zo nm [! Comm issio n
l'ub lic Meeti ng
Case /liSUU ::?012 -006. Cfarkso n St V:m1 1io n 1,1 f ROW
August 2Ji, 20 12
P.igr I nf6
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING ANO ZONING COMMISSION
SPECIAL MEETING
August 28, 2012
Minutes and audio arc available at:
hnp ://w,\ \\'.enl;le wo odgo v .org,l lndc x.as px ?page = 152
I. CALL TO ORDER
~
I he specia l m ee t ing ol the City Planning and Zoni ng Commission w as ca ll ed to ord er at
7:08 p .m. in th e Engl ewoo d City Co uncil Chambers of th e Englewood Civ ic C ent er, Chair
Brick presiding.
Prese 11t :
Absent :
Staff :
Bl eile, Ro th , King , Fi>h , Brick , Ki nton, T uw11l ey
Freemire (a lternat e)
Kn oth , Welker
Alan White, Community Developm ent Directo r
II. CASE #2012·006
~
PUBLI C MEETING
Ke commendation concernin g the S Clark so n ~t Vacation o f Kight-Of-Way
Director White briefly outlined th e agenda for th e mee tin g. H e stated represe ntatives of
Craig H os pital app roac hed Ci ty staff sev e ra l month s ago abou t th e po ten ti al closure of
Clark so n St, ee t to accommodate ,, plann ed expans ion of the hosp ital . Com munity
Deve lopment, Publ ic Works , Utili tie s, Fire, Po li ce and Building and Sa fety staff ha,e been
involv ed in meetings co nce rn ing this issu e. Expanding th e curr en t camp us retai ns this
nationally renowned hospi tal and the associa ted em p loy ment wi thin the City of l ngl ewood.
One-tim e bui ldin g u se tax on th e expan sio n is a consid era b le sourc e of reve nue for th e
Ci ty. A forma l app li ca tion has been ,e ce ived and C raig and Swedish are co-a pplicant s.
Al th e Augus t 6, 20 12 stu dy sess ion Council co nse n sus was for Craig 10 proceed w ith th eir
PX p,111 sin11 plan s that include lh e vacation of lh,? Clarkson Stree l ri cl11 -o f-w ay . Cn11 nri l
req ues l ecl Cra ig Hosp ital conducl a nei ghborh ood mee tin g, whic h wa s held on August 25 '",
as ked for a reco mmen dation fr om th e Plan nin si and Zo ning Com mi ~sion and for Cou nci l to
cond uct a public hearing as par l o f the ordi nan :e ;1dop ti on p rocess.
A t thi s tim e lh e ap pli can t p rese nted the case .
l'l anni ni; and Zo 11 i11g fn111111i ssi on
rublic Meeting
C,1$c lfS UD2 0 12-0U6. Cl.uks on Sl Va~,ni,>n (I f ROW
Aui;u st 28, :!0 12
Puie 2 of 6
fl}
Mr. Mike Fordyce, President and CEO o f Craig Hospital, introduced himself. H e stated th is
petition is all about safety. Craig Hospital has been in Engl ewood fo r over 50 yea rs . Th er e
are thr ee buildings on th e sit e; two ar e fo, patients and o ne is ho using fo r families of
patients as 50% of patients com e from outside o f Colo rado. The ho sp ital does rehabilitatio n
for people with spinal cord injuries and people wi th traumatic brain injury. There arP
approximately 24 3 in-patie nt s per yea r and th ey se rve over 2500 out-patients a year.
Th e patient buildings arP lo cated on th e eas t and west sides of Clarkson Str eel. Patients and
stafi go from eas t to west hundrecis of times a day. There ha ve b ee n tw o pedes tri an
accidents in th e las t 90 days; the re 1s an o n-going co nc ern for safety.
He stat ed over l 000 in vitations wer e sent o ut inviting citizens to the neighborhoo d
mee ting on Augu st 25''; abo ut 30 peo pl e atte nd ed.
M r . Randy Thorn e, of RTA Archi tec ts, pres ented a PowerP oint slid e show of th e proposed
expd 11siu11 . He s<1iu du1i 11g th e twu µeak ti111 e, of udy appmximat ely 647 vehicles a,e
passing by at mid-blo ck along w ith 153 pedestr ia ns cro ss ing at the sa me time . He stated the
hosp ital has an indoo r link, but no ou td oo r link b e tween th e two buildi 11gs . Other point s of
discussion included:
•
► Th e h ospita l nee ds a mo re functi onal fr on l door •
► Access to the Swedish parking ga ra ge and parking area for staff and to
th e Craig Hospital food se rv rce dock will remain op, ,
► From Girard to m id -block of Clarkson is an 8.5 foot rise ; very difficult
for wheelchairs to maneuver
► Buildin gs need to be co nn ec ted at grade
► Patients n eed to be close to staff and Swe dish in an emergency
► There will b e j11 r Jccess
► A new vendo: ;,.,,rking ,,re;i and dock will be located be hind th e west
building
► Current bike mu te w ill be kepi ope n
► Si!;11 age wi ll be i11 st<1 ll eJ tu i11fo1111 tl w publi ( Cldrksu n is 11 u t ,, thr ough
str ee t
► Construction time frame is 4 2 mo nth s; Feb/M ar 20 13 start
► Goal ,s not l o adcl beds; it is to update and increase the size of th e
th e rapy areas and p rovid e sin gle occupa ncy ro o ms
► Tun ne l that li nks Craig to Swed ish w ill rema in
Mr. Jell Ream 0 1 Fe lsburg, Holt and Ullevig sp ok e nexl. H rs com pany p rovided a tr aiiic
ana lysis for thP sitP . HP stalPrl th erP is a lo t nf pf'de~trian tr affi c nn both C'l;,rkson anrl Old
I lampde n. Traffi c cou nts were colle cted at four signali z~d interse cti o ns: G irard , H ampde n
an d the two on Loga n. Pedest rian co unts we re coll ec ted mi d-blo ck on Clarks o n an d at all
nf 1h e crnss ing, o n Old H ampden o n tl1P s111 1th sirl r, nf thP ,raig campu s. D aily trafiic •
•
•
•
f1 l:vming nod Zoning ('ommi ssion
Public ~t"cting
Cu.:;~ tfSiH!:?Oll -006, Clark son St Voc :uio n of RO W
August 28, 2012
l'oge J of6
counts were also done on several surrounding streets. This was all done to see how the
current system is nreralinB. ThPre is a significant amount of redestri,1n traffic rl11P tn thP
fact there are several parking garages in the area. The study showed approximately 4 700
cars a day trav el this section of Clarkson. About 800 of those cars are going into and out of
the Swedish garage, which leaves about 3900 cars going elsewhere. Half of that is traveling
north of G irard. Through trafiic is less than half of the total traffic. He focused on the
impacts right around the campus area. Points discussed included:
► Most people corning to Cra ig con re from the south and the east
► II is proposed to remove street parking on the west side of Emerson and th e
south side of Girard
► Suggest a 4-w ay stop at Clarkson and Girard, removing the signal
► Change signage at Clarkson and Hampden and other areas to direct people
► Hashing pedestrian signs at Pearl and Hampden and several other locations
► Trying to keep traffic from routing onto residential streets
► Clarkson is not a true north/so uth route; it dead ends into a park at Harvard
Gulch
► End result of analysis was tha t sh ifting traffic to other roadways docs not
impact levels of service
► Several recommendations have been made to the City 's traffic division
► A map of neighb orhcod traffic control was viewed and discussed
► Questions about ma ss evacuation were addressed
ThP C'nmrn issinn askPd Mr. Fnrrlyrr what th P general fPPI nf tllP p11hlir mPPting nn A11g11s1
25"' wa s. He again noted IO00 invitations were sent out and about i 8 household s atte11d .
There was concern about what the traffic is going to look like on my street, why are Craig
employees parking in front of rny house and comments about the City need ing to do a
better job because peopl e ar e speeding on our streets. He sa id he felt the meeting ended
up very positively. The peopl e thanked him ior the opportunity to voice their concerns. He
told them the ir conce rn s would b e addressed and Craig would work with the City to see if
we can help mitigate some of the issues lik e parking or speeding. He stated he se nt an
email to all his staff asking th em to be good neighbo rs and to park in the hosp ita l's parking
garag e.
He stat ed for him at the end of da1· it really gets down to sa fety. He stated as h e walked
down the hill today lo go to his car h e saw an ambulance and somebod y laying in the
rniddlc of th e roa d it reall y co me s home for me . He said we don 't have patients at Craig
Hospital, we hav e re sidents . People that co m e to Craig are ther e 45 days to 6 months with
their families; th ey li ve in Engl ewood. The also come back to Englewood for the rest of their
life for their care . Please co11,iue1 th eir s.rfely .r11u 11,e fac t that they are part of this
co mmunity .
1•!nnn ins und Zuaing Cmnm :c;s ion
Publ ic Mccling
Case #S I 182 0 12-0C6, Cl ark son S1 \la\·atinn of llOW
t\ueu 5t 28 , 20 12
P::igr 4 nf 6
Chair Brick noted this is not a public hearing; th e Commis sion has b ee n asked to give a
recommendatio11 lo Council.
El
Com mi ssio n disc ussio n po ints included:
► This is J. grc,it id ea
:,.. Don't believe th e cl ldnge v\'ill impdct th at m any people
► There is more pedestrian traffi c at ri sk than anythmg else
► Th e area should be p edestrian friendl y give n th e focus of the hos pital
► Minimal impact to th e surro unding nei ghbors and over tim e pPn pl P will find
alt ernat e routes that w ill work out just fine
► Problem needs to be ad dressed and applicant has don e a great job
► When th e Commission was working on the Small Area Medical Plan we
committed to build in g a first clas s area for the med ica l proiession. This is the
first step in that process; wou ld lik e t o see more
► In favor of proj ec t because of th e, tr e,111e,11 uous potential th.it if offers
► No doubt th e re is a sa fety issue
► Expans ion of hosp ital is th e p rimary driver of reques t
► f\:ecd to be sure th e traffic plan is done co rr ect ly to dea l with th e s;i fPt\' iss u e
•
► In conformance with a number of the Medical District obje cti ves in th e •
Co mpr ehensive Plan
► Positi ves greatly outweigh the nega tiv es
► HavP th P pPd es tri an crms ing light s cycle longe r to accommodate p eo pl e
who need more time l o cro ss th e stre ets
► Look i1110 uelle,r dLLes; f,0111 th e so uth to the fr o nt door of the hosp ital
Mr. Fi sh moved:
Mr. King seconded : TO APPROVE THE VACA TIO!': OF TH E S. CLARKSO N STREET
RIG ! IT-Or-WAY 13[TW[[N GIRARD ANO H AMPDEN AVENUES
WITH THE FOL LOWIN G:
Th<> ;i pprn priale raspm~nt (s) shall b e rese rved fo r the ben efit of
the City and other ut il ity suppli ers so th at suffic ient access l o utilities
will ue provided.
2. The C ity b icy cle ro ut e o n S. Clarkson Stre et shall be retain ed.
3. C,aig I lo spi tal rep rese ntati ves wi ll contin ue 10 work wi th City
staff to fin ali ze and implement reco mmend ed sig nage, pa rkin g and
pedest rian crossi ng imp rove ments agreed to between tne C ity and
Craig Hospit;i l. •
•
•
•
t-'lann111g and Znnrng Con111 ission
l'ub \it \11:ct ing
Ca~c: #S UB2 0 12-0 06. Clark son S1 Vaca 11on or ROW
Aug u~t 28, 20 11
P:ige5 of 6
A\'ES :
NA YS :
ABSTAI N:
t\BSENT :
4. Crai g Hospital sh all be responsible ior costs associated with
modifying the art shuttle b us route.
5. That the City w ork closel y with the applicant and a specific and
m ea sur ab le an d defin ed tr affic plan b e put into p la c e to address
both traffic now and safety and p ed estrian crossin g issues in th e
area .
Bleil e, R.,1il 1. Fi sh, Kin g, Brick, Kint o n, To wni e~
Non~
None
Kn o th , Welke r
Motion carried .
Ill . PUBLIC FORUM
~
Th e re wa s 110 pul.Jl iL in dlt e 11Uc111 Le.
IV . ATTORNEY'S CHOICE
0
Th ere was 110 att o rn ey pr ese nt.
V. STAFF'S CHOICE
G
D irector White sta ted a process is nee d ed fo r ,1 vaca tion o f ri gh t-o f-way. H e sugges t ed it b e
discussed at a future study ses sion. Future meetings include:
September 5:
Septemb er 18 :
Study ses sion to di scuss distill eri es and brewerie s
Fl ood Middle Sc hool Publi c H ea ring
H e reminded th e Commiss ion th <: DRCOG tr,1i11i11 g se»iu11 will u e held u11 Se µt er11 b er 15'";
resistr ati o n d eadli ne is Se p te111b er 6'h.
H e no ted th e m ee tin g packet fo r the Septem ::ie r 5'" m eeti ng w ill go out to mo rr ow an d will
not include th e 111111utes trom tornght 's m ee tin g. Th e record in g !t'C retary will email th e
minutes to th e Commiss io n later thi s wee k f01 1ev iew and appr o v al at th e Sep tem be, j '"
mf'eting.
VI. COMMISSIONER 'S CHOICE
fl)
M r. Kinton asked th at Staff p us h to es tablish a proce ss for vacation of right-of-way .
Sc ,er al members welcomed Mr. Freemire to the Co mr111ssi o n.
Planning Md Zonir,g Co mmi s~i on
Publi : t-.k ctin g
Cnsc #SUB2 0 12-006, Cbarkson S1 Vac:nion of RO W
Augusl 28, 2012
P:igc-6 n f (,
Mr. Bl eile had questions regarding ro ad repair in the City .
Mr. Freernire st,1tcd th ere mJ ,' b e Department of Tran sportation funds av,1ilable for wo rk at
Oxford Station . H e offered to do so me rl.!seJrd, i11tu the 111all!.!r .
Th e m eeting adjourned at 9:09 p.m
Barb ara Kr eckl o w, Recording :;ecreta ry
•
•
•
C T y 0 F
F I R E
i,
ENGLEWOOD
DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT,
G•ry Sears, City Manager
Michael Patwoz:a, Fire Chlef
August l, 2012
Meetii.g with Representative of Craig Hospital
On JIiiy 24, 2012. members of tho Fire Department staff, along with Public Works Traffic
Bnglneer I.add Vestry met with Mr. LH Means from Craig Hospllal to discuss the closure of
the 3400 block of Soutb Qarkson SL The closure Is associated with the proposed
expansion ofCralgHospttaL
Mr. Means explained the planned expansion of the facility Including the street vacation.
Fire Department staff made recommendations regarding responses to the fadllty Itself and
the emergency depanmentat Swedish Medical Center. Mr. Mems agreed With our
rccomm~ndations and will ronttnue to work with us to resolve any lssuei .
The Plre Depanment s<aff agreed that the proposed vaca!lon of the HOO block of South
Clarkson would not pose any obstacles that can.,ot be onrcome, and would mtnbnlze the
potllntial for auro,pedestrian accidents associated with the present conflgurallon of the
campus .
361S 5. Elitl Sut:ei En lfewood, Q)lor•do &0110 Adm!nlscrltion 303-762-2470 FA~ l0l·16l•l.&06
-.en,lewoodp.tJ>'I
C>
()
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THROUGH :
THROUGH :
FROM:
DA'lt:
SUBJECI':
City Council
Gary Seers, City Manager
Rir.k Kahm, Director of Public Works /
Ladd Vostry, Traffic Engineer (
August 9, 2012
CLARKSON/GIRARD ACCIDENT HISTORY
COUNCILREQUESTNO. 12-148
City Council requested information reguding accident S1atis1 ic., at the inu:isection uf
Clarkson and Girard, as well as on Clarkson adjacent to the Craig Hospital entrance
(3400 block). Both Clarkson and Girard are classified a., collector S1reets : the average
traffic volume on Clarkson is appioxim•tely 4,700 vehicles per day (vpd), Girard carries
about 3,500 vpd.
Staff :ooked at accident data al these locations from 2007 to date. Our records show that
a total of seven crashes were reported at the Clatlcson and Girard intersection and a U>tal
of six erashu in the 3400 block of Oarkson during that time (please see summary
below).
Year
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012 Ito datel
J ■tersectiou related cruhes
I
2
I
1
2
0
Total of crashe1
Note: (•) an injury type accide nt
3400 S. blo<,k crashes
2
1
2
I(•)
0
0
6
There was only one rca.r -cnd with injwy accidet,I in thi s s,ud y are, (in 2010). TI1c
a,;cidenl data also indicates that a majority of crashes in the 3400 block of
South Clarkson involved either parited vehicles or v-.hiclcs making parking maneuvers .
Please note lhat even thougit !here i, a of history of "c!.osc calls " related 10 pede strian/
vehicle conflicts in this wu, oo pcdCS1rnln type crashe, wer, rq,oncd over this period of
time .
/It
•
•
•
Al1nWhltt
.From:
Sent:
To:
Subject :
FYI
From :
Ladd Vostry
Frid&y, August 17, 20121:58 PM
Alon Wh ile
FW : south darkson st closure
Sent: Thu~oy, August 16 , 2012 6:28 PM
To: administrlltlon@cralghospltal.org
Cc: Ladd Vostry
subject: soulh clarl<son st closure
Dear Administrator at Craig Hospital.
As an owner of a property on South Clarkson Street, and two other properties nearby, we would
likii to Id you know that we wholiiheartedly endorsii your plan to close the section of South
Clarkson around Craig Hospital . We think it is a great idea . We see cars speeding qu ickly up and
down South Clarkson Street every day ond people struggle to cross the street around the .
hospital. We think that this sort of innovative thinking will improve neighborhood and
• hospital safety and it will enhance the neighborhood os a whole .
•
A few years ago , we consulted with the City of Englewood about doing some urban landscaping
on South Clarkson Street to slow down traffic and we received endorsement to come up with
some possible plans . With local and notional economic troubles , we put our ideas on hold, but.
your proposals perhaps will energize us to initiate some planning if we can find other interested
neighbors .
Thank You --
The Brays
2890 South Clarkson Street
Englewood, CO 80113
August 20, 2012
Randy Penn, Mayor
City of Englewood
SUBJECT: CRAIG HOSPITAL PROPOSAL TO CLOSE SOUTH CLARKSON
Dear Mayor Penn:
We are surprised that Council is even considering the potr,ntial of closing South Clar1<son
per the request of Craig Hospital. Our home is located east of Broadway and north of
Craig Hospital. As we count the number of Englewood streets east of Broadway that
provide direct access across the creek, we find Lincoln, Logan, and Clar1<son • three.
(And, we find that Lincoln provides only cumbersome access across the creek.) To
consider penmanent closure of one-third of these streets is unthinkable.
Is there some undisclosed plan to build a traffic tunnel under the Craig Hospltal-<lesired
green space? Where do the city traffic engineers think that traffic re-routed from Clar1<son
will need to t,:avel?
Clearly, we think this is an extremely poor plan, and that Craig Hospltal must be
encouraged to seek some other solution to their issues .
Sincerely,
Me~orie L. Becker
Lawrence T. Becker
644 East Yale Place
Englewood, CO 60113
•
•
•
•
•
•
623 East Amherst Place
Englewood, CO 80113
August 20, 2012
Mr. Mike Fordyce, President and CEO
Craig Hospital
3425 South Clarkson Street
Englewood, Colorado 80113
Copy to Community Development Department, City of Englewood
Dear Mr. Fordyce,
This is in response to your letter of August 13, 2012 in which you propose closing
the 3400 block South Clarkson Street.
With all due respect to the quality of care provided by your medical institution, it
is my firm opinion that your plan would introduce considerable inconvenience
and further street congestion for the citizens of Englewood and surrounding
areas .
For my personal address, as well as my neighbors', Clarkson is the most direct way
to access our street, East Amherst Place, which does not extend west through to
Logan, an already heavily used arterial.
It would seem preferable that your needs be addressed by increasing use of the
existing crossover bridge and that If further acces s is needed, you consider adding
another crossover bridge or an underground tunnel rather than dosing an
important automobile access route to the Swedish Medical Complex and other
nearby places of need.
It Is my sincere hope that you will pursue all other possibilities for satisfying your
needs rather than to close the 3400 block of South Clarkson Street.
Thank you for your consideration.
Very truly yours,
~#.6 ~._a-)
Virgene H. Buthman
ORDIJ\A~CE NO.
SERJES OF 20 I 2
BY ALTHORITY
COlNCIL BILL NO. 4q
INTRODUCED BY COI.J]\'CIL
MEMBER _____ _
A DILL fOR
AN ORDfNANCE V AC..\TING THE 3400 BLOCK OF SOUTH C LARKSON STREET
BETWEEN GIR.\RU AND HAMl'UEN AVcl\l:t::S IN THT: C ITY OF ENGLEWOOD,
COLORADO Bl.ff RESERVING \JTU..ITY EASl:MENTS AND CITY BICYCLE IWU I~ UN
SOUTH CLARKSON .
WHEREAS, 1.rn ig Hosp ital anri Sweriisl·, Hospital , as co-applicant s subwjned appliemion fo r
the vocation o f South ('.larkson Street bctw~en Girard and Ha :npclen Avenues 111 .1ccmmnmlate a
plaruicJ expansion of Craig Hospital : and
\VHEREAS, the City's concerns with the vacati on and :iubscqucnl clo sure hove been met with
respect tu the impacl on c:::mcrgt:m.:y vc:::hidc access .iml 1e sµo1~se times to Swedish llospi1al. impacts
on non-emergency traffic and circulation pnnems in the area and how those :.:l u~un::s um ~ i111p ,11.:1
•
pedestnan movements and safety in the are ~; and •
WHEREAS, appropriate easements shall be retained for the benefit of the Cit y and other uti l ity
supp liers so that suffi cient access to utilities is pro,·id ed ; and
WHEREAS. 1he I. ity o f Englewood Ri cyc lo Route nn Snuth C.brkson St reel shall be rernined
through the closed st reet ; and
WI lEREAS, the eastbound Art Shuttle route will need to be modified 10 trnve l north on
Emerson instc:::aU ufClmk-;o n. th e:u West 011C lit.rkso 11 10 a s101> at Crai g llosp it nl. the remaining Art
Shuttle route remains the same; anll
WHEREAS. Craig has conunitted to the cost s of movi ng slops and pnntmg new rout e maps
associated w:th the mo di li cation to the An Shuttle ro ut es: and
WI-I ER FAS : futur e improvements . such as pedestrian light s. benches, street trees and ot her
amenitie s ,,ithin 1he vac;1rcd R1ghi.c,f-Way wnulct he paid for hy the kndowncrs: and
\.VH.ERE/\S , the Planning and Zoning Commi ss ion re viewed th.i s vacation rc<1u es t ;;it a public
111c:c1i11g on August 28 , 2012 and rcconu11cndcd approva l with condi1ions;
NOW , TIIEREFORE, l3 E IT ORDAINED BY THE C ITY COUN CIL OF TH E C IT Y 01'
E'IG LEWUUIJ , ClJLUKAUO, :,;; i vl '' WS :
•
•
•
•
Sec:\i!!Ll. Tne Cit y Council of the City o f Englewood, Colorado, hereby authorizes vacati on of
the 340\,' Block of South Clnrkc ·,n as shown on Exlribit /\, with the following conditions:
I. Ci ty shall retain a Tran spona tion and Utility Ea sement fo r uuliues over the vaca ted
Right -of-Way
2. /\ ten fo ot ( 10') wi de bic ycle route on South Clark,;o n Street shall be :etai:ied .
3. Craig Hos pit a l representatives will co nlinue to · nrk with the City to fin alize and
i1nplement recommended signage , parking and pedestrian cro ss inP. impro vement s
agroe d to between the Cit y and Craig Hospi ta l.
4. Craig Hos pit a l shall be respon si ble for costs ass ociated with modifyir.g the An Shut1lc
bus ro ute .
5. That the ·2 it y work closely with the applicant and a specific . meas urable and defined
traffi c pl an be put 11110 place 10 ad dress bot h traffi c now and sa fe:y and p ·destrian
cros si ng issues in th e area .
6. Craig Hos pi ta l shall rnaima in and :,e resp ons ible for the Bike P111 h and th e sidewalk>.
lnt rvd uced . read in full. an d pa ss ed on first reading on the I 7th da y of September, W 12 .
Publi shed hy Title as a Bill for an Ordinance m th e Cit y's officia l new spa per on th e 21st day of
Scp1cmhcr , 2012 .
Pub)b,l11::<l as a B!II fur an Onlirnu11,;c uu th e Ci 1y·s o nici c.1 website beg innin g on the I 9t l1 day of
September, 20 12 for thiny (30 ) da ys .
Rand y P Penn . Mayor
ATTEST:
Louc rislria A . Ellis. C it y Clerk
I, Louc n shia A. EII IS , C ity C lerk of the C it y o f Englewood , Co lora do. he re by ccni :y that the
abo ve and foreg oing is a true copy o fa Bill fo r an Ordinance. introduced. read in fu ll. and pas se d on
first reading on th e 17th day of September, 2012.
Loucr isltia . .\ F.ll is
EXHIBIT"A"
Clarkson Street Righi-of-way . being a part of the southwesl ¼ (SW¼) of Section 35 and the
so ut11ea sl ¼ (SE¼) of Section 34, Township 4 South , Range 68 West of the Sixth Principal
Me ridian, Ci ty of Englewood . County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado more particularly described
as follows:
Commencing al th e No rthwest corner of Se ctio n 2, Township 5 South. Range 68 West. from
which the East qu arter comer of Section 3~, Township~ Sou th, Rang e 66 West bears
N00°0 6'23'W a dislance o f 2668 .86 feet;
Thence NUU 0 06'23"W along said section li ne a distance of 30 .00 fee t to th e northerly ri~ht-uf-
way of Hampden Avenue to the Point of Beginning ;
ThAnCP. SR9°33'04"\'.I along said northerly righ l-of-way lin e a distance of 30.00 feet to a ~oinl on
the wes terly right -of-way l ine of Clarkson Street;
Thence N00°06'2B"W along said wes te rly right-cf-w ay line a distance of 500 .50 feet to a poi nt
on the south erl y right-of-way l in e of Girard Avenue ;
Thence N69°58'2 1 ":: along said southerly right -of-way line a distance of 60 .00 fee t to a ~oint on
the easterly right-of-way line of Clarkson Street :
•
Thence S00 °06'2B"E along said easterly right-of-way li ne ad stance of 599.06 f ee t to a point on •
said northerly right-of-way line of Hampden Ave nu e;
Thence SB9'33'04"W alony sai~ nu,t11t111y rig l1l -of-way line a distance of 30 .00 feet to the Point
of Beginning ;
Said parcel contains 35,966 square fee t. (0 .B257 acre) mo re or less, re taining a transportation
and utility easem ent.
Prepared By:
James V . Has ting s. Colorado Re9istered f'.L.S. NO . ?.2917
Ande rson and Has tings Cn n!=;u lt:=rnl s. Inc
12506 West Boyo ud five ., Suite 350
Lakewuod ,CO 80 22 B
(303 j 433-8486
Page 1 o f 2
•
e..-------------------·
}fJ/fil,f/JJ/;Jv t?(HIBIT A
•
PONTrT
fllti'9N'f
jf-luv 1WJ STAJIP[f} ,s t2fl8.J w KAIU ear cm· ar EMU/KW
I
~~ Cl..#.l(iiSON STR££T
. RtGHr-OF-WAY VACAllON
CCINTA!NS J!i,966 .Stl FT. (0.8257 ACR!S)
NOTE: THIS F ;,,IBIT DOES NCT
REPRESENT A 1,~:vUMENTED SURVEY.
IT IS iNT£N0£0 ONLY TO DEPICT
TH£ A TTA CHEO OESCl?IP TION.
NORTH
0 50 JOO 200
SCALE: 1 " = JOO'
• OR.no ;· ANO~:~N Jt HASTINGS
BMC , .. -100· A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTlON OF
60' RICIIT-OF-JfA Y VACATION
c,l[cKcos ,-a,,,._. --4f-J06-•-•o.-. -------l 711£' SW 1/4 SECTlON JS. T.4S., R.68W.,
o1\1-f '2 SEP 2012 999-12-168! 6TH P.M.
COUNCIL COMMUNICAl mN
Dale: Agenda llem : Subject:
Sepl emb er 17, 20 12 11 Ci Resolu tio n Trar:sferring and Appropriating
Fund s fr o1n th t• Risk M,mage m ent and
Empl oye e Ben e;,ts Fu nds to the Capital
Proj ec ts Fund for the Hum an
Reso ur ce Or.1cl c St;-tndard Bcn~fit Pr o jec t
lniliated By: I ~t ~,h So1,..a ce:
Fi n;m cf' tln<I Acfrninist rali vf) Srrv itPc;; I Fr,rnk Gryele1.vic z, f)ir(• to r
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Cily Council l1<1s not discussed thi s tr,m sfe r o r to pi c bul has ma de compute r upgrades and efficiencies ,1
µri ur ily i11 th~ µa~l.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
• Slaff reco mmen ds that Co un cil approv e thi s tran sfer and supp le ment ,11 appro pri,11 ion o f $4 3,000 from tl ·e
Ris k Mana ge men t and Emplo1•ce Beneiit s Fund s to the Cap it al Pro jec ts Fu nd for a Hum ,,n Resource O racle
OSB P~oject which will be und ert aken in 20 13.
•
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS , AND , TERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
Th e Human Re so ur ce s Departm en t has tri ed to mak e Orad.:! "se lf-service" avai ltib le to emplo yees for .i
num be, oi \•ears. Th e fu nds trans ferre d wi ll be used to fund the . :i-servi ce project thal will all ow
empl oy ees mo re access to the s1·stern .
~OURCES AND UStS Of tUNUS :
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND (WORKERS COMPENSATION);
SOURCE OF FUNDS :
Fund Balan ce $6 ,UO O
USE OF FUNDS :
Tran;fer 10 th e Capi tal Pr o jects Fund {HR Oracl e 058 P,ojfc t; $6,000
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND:
Fund Balance
USE OF FUNDS:
Tran sfer 10 1he Capital Projec ts Fund (l~R Oracle O5B Proj ec 1)
CAPITAL PROIKTS FUND:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Transfer in from the Risk Management r-und
Transfer in from lhe Employe e Ben efils Fund
To 1al Sou rces o f Funds
USE OF FUNDS :
HR O racle O SB Projecl
FINANCIAL IMPACT
$3 7,0,10
S37,000
$6,000
$17 000
$4 3,U0U
$43.000
Thi s ac ti on •\'ill reduce 1h e Ris k M anagemenl fond by $6,000 and lhe Empl oyee Renefi l Fu n d by $37,000,
bul lhc funds wi ll b e use d l o fund lhe HR O ra cl e OSB Pr oj ec t
LIST m ATTACHMENTS
Proposed Reso lu tio n •
•
•
•
RESOLUTION 1'0 .
SERIES OF .'·)P
A RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FROM THE RISK
MANAGEM[K i rVND AND EMPLOYEE BENEFn·s FUND TO THE CAPITAL
PROJECTS F'. 'ND (CPFJ Fl)R THE HR ORACLE OSB PROJECT
WH1..REAS , the Cuy Cou nr.11 has mad e computer upgrades and dlic1encies a pn onty : and
WHEREAS , tho Englewood Humon Re .sou rces Department ha s tried to make Oracle "self-
service" availahle to e:nployees fo r a number of years ; and
WHEREAS , the fu nds transferred will be used to fund th e self-service proj ect that will allow
em ployee s more access to the sys tem; and
WHEREAS. tl :c total cos t of th e Project is $43,000, the passage of this Re so luti on allow s the
transfer and supplemental appropriation from the Risk Management and Employee llcncfits
Fund s to the Capita l Projec ts Fund for :t HR Ora cle OSB Project which will he undc:1akcn in the
year 2013.
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI TY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO . THAT :
,S_f,;:;,Jl , I . The City Counc il of the City o f Englcn·ood. Colorndo suppons the tran sfer of
func!; fr om the Risk Mana~ement and Employee Bencfirs Funds to 1he Capi :a l Proje cts Fund, as
fol ows :
SOURCF.S AND usr.s OF FUNDS
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND (WORKERS COMPENSATION)
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Fund Balance S 6,000
USE OF FUNDS :
Transfer to 1hc Cap ital Projects Fund (HR Orac le OSB Projc,:1) S 6,000
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND
SOURCE m· F!IN nS:
Fund Balance $37.000
USE OF FUNDS :
Transfer tot he Capital Projccls Fund (HR Oracle OSB Projec t) $37,000
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
SOURCE or FUNDS:
Transfer in from the Risk Managem en t Pund
Tramfcr III from the l:mployce Uenefus Fund
Total Source s of Fw1ds
t.:SI:: OF FU!\1>S :
HK Orac le USl:I ProJccl
$6,000
sn,ooo
$43,000
$43,000
Section 2. The C;ty ~1nnugcr :ind the Oirec1 o r of Fi11anc1.: and Admini strat ive Servi ces .ire
hereby au thori zc<l 10 make the abovl.! changes to the 2012 BuJg\:l fur the City uf EngkwouJ.
ADO I' rED ,\ND Al'l'ROVED llus 17th day of Scplcmbcr, 2012 .
R:mdy P. Penn , Mayor
Loucri shia A. Elli s, City Clerk
I, Lo ucri shia A Elli s, City C lerk fo r the City o fEngle woo<l, Colorado, hereby certify the
above i~ a tmc cop y of R -:so lution No . __ . Ser ies of 2012 .
Lou cn shia A Ellis , Ci1y Clerk
•
•
•
•
•
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
-·-
Date: Agenda Item: Subject:
Sep tember 17, 20 I ~ 11 C II Reso lut ion Tr .\tisfer rin?, aud Ap pr op ri atmg
Funds from the Publi c lmprovr.menl Fund
(PIF) 10 the Cap ital Pr ojec ts Fu nd (C PF )
fur th~ Eme,gency A l~,t Si,en P,uj~Ll
-I Staff Source: Initiated By:
Fin;1 nrP ,1nrl Adn,inistr;Hi ve Se rv ices Fr ank G ryg le"v icz, n ircctor
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
City Council approved the purchase of th e Emergency Alert Siren equ ipment b1· m o ti on o n lune 4, 2012.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends Coun ci l approve th is transfer ,1nd supple m en tal appropriation o f $'1:!,000 fr om Publ ic
lmpro\'em ~nt hmd to th e Cap ital Pr o ject s Fund ior th e Emerge ncy Alert Si ren Pro1ce1 .
BACKGROUND , ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
Th e Police Department applied for and rece :ved a grant from the Stale of Colorado in !he amo unt o f
$41 ,&5 4.50 for Emerge ncy Al ert Siren equipm~nt. The tota l cos t o f th e Pro ject is $83 ,3 09. Th e Capi t al
Pr ojec ts Fui ,d l1as limited resou rces ava ilable to iu nd the remaining cos t of th e Prc ject; th erefore, a
transfer of 'i,-",000 is required from the Plf.
SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS :
PURL ,_ IMPROVEMENT FUND :
SOURCE OF FUNDS :
Unassigned FU11d 8dlclll Lt! $4 2,000
USE O F FUNDS :
Tran ~fe r to th e Capi tJI Pr o jec ts Fund :,4 2,000
CAPITAL PRO!ECTS FUND:
SOURCE OF FUNDS :
lransie, in fr om 1he Pub li c Improvement Fund $41,UUU
USE OF FUNDS :
[mergenq, Alerl Si ren Project S42 ,000
FINAN C'!Al. f"-IPACT
Th is acti on will reduce the PIF 's Unassign ed Fund Balan ce by $42,000. Th e iunds will offset expenditures
for the Em ergency Al ert Si re n Project funded in th e Cap it al Pr ojects cund .
LIST OF ATTACliMENTS
Pr opose d Keso lut,on
•
•
•
•
•
•
RESOLUTION NO.
SERIES OF 201~
A RES<1l.UTION TRAi\JSFERRlNG AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FP.OM THE PUB LI C
MPR( :ME ',T FUND (PIF) TO THE CAP ITAL PR OJECTS FUND (CPF) FOR
EMERGENCY ALERT SUU:N PRO JE CT.
WHEREAS , the C ity applied for aml received a grant of S41,654 .50 for Emergency Alert
Siren cqui?mcnt from the St ale of Colorad o; and
WHERl:AS. the City Council ap proved th e purchase cf the Emergency Alert Si ren equipment
by th e passa ge of a Motion on Jun e 4 , 2012; and
WHEREAS. the Imai cost of the Project is 583.309 . the C11y or E::giew,l<ld rccei,ed a grant m
the amount of S41.654.50. the remaining cost of the Project $42.000 is requirc.d to fund the
project .
l\OW. THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY TH E CITY COU:--IC IL OF TH E CITY OF
ENGLE WOOD . COLORA,JO. THAT :
Section I . The Ci ty Cou ncil of th e City of Englewood, Colorado su pports the transfer of
funds from the Public Impro vement Fund Halance to the Ca pit al Projects Fund. a, follows :
PI.JULIC IMPROVEMENT FUND
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
I:nassi1:,'lled Flln<l Anl:m ce $42,001)
USE OF FUNDS :
Transfer to the Capi tal l'rojec ts Fund $42,000
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Tran sfer in from the Public Improvement Fund S4~.000
USE OF FUNDS :
E1m:rgcm.:y Alen Si.rc;ll rruj cc..:1 $42.000
Section 2. The Cuy Manager and the IJirec tor or Finance and Admirustrati v~ Scr.-1ce s are
hereby authorized 10 make th e abo,·e changes to the 20 12 Budget for the Cit} of F.nglew ood.
ADOPTED AND APPR OVED thi s 17th day of September, 2012 .
AlTEST
Ki!r-•,v P. Pe1m, M ayo r
I m1 cri slti a A. Elli s. Ciry Clerk
I, Loucrishin A. Elli s, Cit y Clerk for th e Cit y of Eng lewoo d. Cc lorudo . hereby cert if)' the
above is a tmc copy of Re solut io n No . __ , Series of 10 1 ~.
L0 uc ri shi a A. Ellis, Cuy Clerk
•
•
•
• COUNCIL COMMUNICATIOII;
·-
Date : Agenda Item: Subjecl :
Septem ber 17, 20 12 11 C iii Resolution A p pro priat ing Funds ior
Stat io n Area Mas ter Pl an Pro ject
Initiated By : I Staff Source:
Fin anct.' and Admin istrati ve Se ,vices Fran k <.;ryglewicz, D irector
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Council ;tpp mvP.d hy m otion, .1 contrac t :n r thP Fn glF>woorl , O xfo rd , ,rn d Rates Station A rea M as te r Pl an
Pr o jec t w ith Cran call A rambu la at th e Jun e 4, ~0 I~ Regul ar Council Meeti ng.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff reco m mends Coun cil ap prove th e appro priat ion oi $120,000 (Regi o nal Transport ati on ')istrict Grant
i unds wi ll_ b e rece ived) fo r a Stati on Area Mast er Pl an (ST AM P) Pro ject in th e Pub lic Im provem ent Fun d.
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
• Co mmu nity D eve lop ment is receivi ng a Stat ion Are,, M aste r Pla n (S TAMP) G ran t oi S 1 ~'l,000 in 20 1 2.
•
Th e City's rn atchin g funcJs 1$30,000) are budge ted in th e PI F. As thi s is ,1 multi-yea r pr o jec t. the PIF is th e
app ropria te fun d to accou nt ior expen ditures relat ed t o the G rant as PIF appropria tions do no t lapse at
year-e nd.
Thi $ cxp~n di'.Lir c W.l!. o r1gi11 Jll y b udge ted in th e Gene ral Fund (Community D cvcl opmc m 1. Es tima te d
expenditur es will be reduced to refl ec t the reduc t ion.
SOURCES A,'IJD USES OF FUNDS:
PURUC IMPROVEMENT Fur -
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Statio n A,ea Master Plan (STAM P) Gr,rn i
USE OF FUNDS:
St atio n Are,1 Mas ter Pl an Pr o j ec t
FINANCIAL IMPACT
S I ~O.LIUO
$1 ~0.000
Th b c1u iun \\ill app 1up ri al~ $ I ~0.000 in r,1a nt Hmcls in 1h e Puhl lC Im provement f lln d. The re w ill not be a
net impac t O'l the Gener al Fun d.
LIST OF AlTACHMENTS
P,oposed Re;o luti on
AA
----. , I
• RESOLUTIO N NO.
•
•
SERIES OF 20 I 2
A RES OLLTION APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE ENGLEWOOD, OXFORD AND
13ATES STATION AREA MASTER PLAN PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the Englewoo d Cit y Coun cil approved by 1r• 1iQ1 1 a con1rac1 fnr th e En gle mrl,
Oxford and Bute s St ation Arca Master Plan Proj ect with Cr.::-.-lall Arambula at the Jw1e 4,.
Council Meeting ; and
\\>11EREAS, 1he City of Englewood is receiving a S1>1ion Area Master Plan (ST AMP) Grant
o f$120,000 i:, 20 12 : and
WHER EAS . th e Cit y's mat ching fw1d s 1,30.000 are budgeted in lh e Publi c Improvement
Fund : and
WHEREAS, thi s is a multi-year proj ect , the Publi c Improvement fund (PTF) is the appropriate
fund 10 accoum fo r expenditures rel alcd to 1he Grant as Plf approprialions do not lapse at ye ar-
cnd.
NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TH E CITY COUNC IL OFllfE CITY OF
El'\GL EWOOD. COLORADO. TH AT:
Section I. Tilc City Co uncil of the City uf En glt:w ood. Co lorado appro priates fund fo r the
Englewood. Oxford and Bates Station Area Master Plan Proj ec t to the Public Impro vement Fund ,
as follows:
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FUND
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Station Area Masicr Plan [STAMP) Grant S 120 ,000
USE OF FUNDS :
Station Ar ca Ma ster Plan I ST AMP) SI 20 .000
Sect io n 2 Th.: C it y Manager and the Director of finance and Administ rative Services a.re
hereby authorized to make the above changes to the 10 11 B:,Jgct for the C'i ly of Englewoo d.
ADOP TED AND APPROVED this I ith rla y o f Scplcmbcr, 20 12.
ATTEST .
Rand y P. Penn . ~layor
l.oucri ,hia A. Ellis, Cit y Clerk
1, Loucrishia A. Ellis. Ci ty Clerk for the City of Englewood. Colorado , hereby certify the
above i!; n true copy of Resoluti on No . __ , Series of 201:.
Loucri shia A. Elli s, Ci ty Clerk
•
•
•
--
:
COUNCIL COMMUN ICATION
Dat e: Agenda Item : Subject:
Se plember 17, 1012 11 C iv Resolutio n Trans fer ring Funds fro m th e
Ri sk Mana gemcn l Fund lo !h e Gen eral
Fund
Init iated Bt : 1 Sl aff Source :
Fin,1n ce and Administ rat ive Services Fr ank Gryglewicz, Di rec to r
·--------
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS CO UNCIL ACTION
City Council d 1sc uss~d and directed staff to prepare :he nec essary docu m e nts for Cou nci l to take action at a
regular cou n r.il rn Pe tin g t o ,1p pr ove a tr ansf@1 n f $200,000 fr c,m lhP R1,;k M .1n.1eement Fund to the Gener.ii
Fu nd ,11 !he Augusl 1 l, 20 12 Sludy Sessi on .
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Slaff recommcmds Counci l .1 p p rove lhi~ tr ansfc:r ol $200,0 00 ir om th e Ri sk M,:ma gemen l Fund lo th e G cnc r.11
Fund .
BACKGRO UND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
• During the :!01 3 butJ ge t d i~cus sio ns w ith si..ifi, S200,000 in the Ri sk M,U1Jge1n1::11 1 Fur 1Ll W dS idenrifi~d d ~ d
pole nti al transfe r to th e Gener al Fund to nelp increase th e unassigned iund balJnce. Thi s subjec l w.as di sc u~se d
al !he S1ucl1· Session o n AuguSI 13. 20 12. Cily Counci l direc t ed Sl aff 10 prepare !he necessary d ornmenlS for
Coun cil to la ke a c tmn on thi s transic r ul a regul a r counci l m eeting, ltndersla nding that th ere is a re m o te
poss ibilily !hat 1h e General Fund could be required to abso rb lhe cos! of claims if they exceed !he reso urces
avai lab le to th e Risk Managemeri t Fund.
SOURCES AND USES OF FU~OS :
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND :
SOURC E OF FUN DS :
Una.isign ed Fu nd Bal.1nce S2'J O,OOO
USE Of FUN DS :
Tr ~n sfe r Ol:t to th e Genera l Fund S200,000
GE NERAL FUND :
SOURC E OF FUNDS :
Tr ansfe r in i1om th e Ri sk Ma11 ;\gemP~11 Fu nd 5200,000
USE OF FUN['I S:
UnJssi gned Fund Bala1,..:e S200,000 •
FINANCIAL IMP,\L r
This ac11 011 w1'I reda ce !h e Risk Manag e men1 s Fund Unassign ed Flind Balan ce by 5200,000 and In crease
General Fund 's Unassi gned Fuod ~alance b1• S2UU ,UllU.
LIST Of ATTACHMENTS
Propos ed Re!.n luti on
•
•
•
• RESOLUTION NO.
•
•
SEKI [~· OF 20 12
A R.ESOLUTJ0:'-1 TRANSFERRING FUNDS FROM THE RIS K MANAGEMENT FUND TO
THE GENERAL FUND .
WH EREAS. dunng th e 2013 Budget di scuss ions $200,000 in the Kisk Management Fw1d was
idcntilicd as a potential tran sfer 10 th e Ge neral Fund 10 help increase the Unassigned Fund
balance ; and
WHEREAS , the Eng le wood Ci ty Co un ci l di sc ussed th e transfer ofS200,000 from th e Risk
Ma nagcmcnl to the Gene r:il Fund Jt the Augu st 13 , 20 12 Stud y Sess ion; and
WHEREAS, the Er.g lewoorl Ci1y Co un cil discussed th e trnn sfcr wi lh tlu.· uncl erstm ul ing thil t
there is a re•note po ssib ilit y that the Genera l Fund co uld be rcqui,cd 10 ab s x b the cos t of claims
if they excee d the resources ava il ab le to the Risk Mana)(cmcnl Fund .
NOW. T HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TH E CITY COUNC IL OF TH E C ITY OF
ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO.THAT:
Section I . The L'lly Council ol' the City or Engl ewood . Colorado su pp ons the tran s!t:r o f
funds from the Ris k \fanagement Fund 10 the Ge nera l Fund. as fo ll ows:
RISK MANAGEME~T Fl/1\'D
SOURCE OF FUND S:
U11 assi ~'Tl ed Fund Bal:tnce
USE OF FUNDS :
Transfer 10 the Genera l Fu nd
,;ENEnAL FIJND
SOURCE OF .-UNIIS:
Transfer in from th e Ri sk Mana gement Fund
USE OF FUNDS :
Unass igned Fund Ba \;mcc
$200,000
$200,000
'200,000
Section 2. The City Manager and the Di rector o f Finance and Admin istrative Services arc
hereby auth orized 10 make lhc above changes to tl1e 20 12 IJudgcl for the City <>t' l:nglcwood.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 17th day of September. 20 12
ATrEST
Randy P. Penn , May or
l.oucrishia i\. El!is , Ci1 y Cl erk
I. Loucri ,hi a .'\. Elli s, City C'lcrk fo r the Cit y o f Englc wc,od . Col0cado , hereb y certi fy 1he
above is ,1 tm c copy of Reso lut ion No . __ , Scrks of 20 I 2 .
Louc ri shia A. Eili s, C ity C lerk
•
•
• COUNCIL COMMUN ICATION
Date Age nda It em Subject
September 17, 2012 A resol11t ion providing Police Officers
11 CV to e ith e r remain in the ICMA-RC
M o ney Pu rc h ,1 se Plan or to emer th e
Fire and Poli ce Pension As socia 1io11
Statewide Defined Bene fit Plan . A ll
future Police Office rs will en ter th e
Fire and Police Pens ion Assoc ia tion
St,,t ewide De lin ccl Be m'!iil Plan -Init ia ted By I Staff Sourc e
Fi nance and Admirns trati ve Serv ic es Deoartm ent Frank Grvl?.lewic 1., Director
CO U N CIL GOAL ANO PREVIO US CO UNCIL ACTION
The Crty Co uncil ,md staff dis cussed the changes as part o f bbo r nei;o,iations ,11 an Ex ecutive Study Se ssi on
held pre viousll' this 1•ear.
RECO M ME N DED ACTION
•
The Departm ent uf Finn nc , an d Admini str,,ti ve Service reco:11m ends th e City Council ,,ppro ve t!1e atta ched
(n on ·bindr ng) reso lution prnviding l11a1 ,tctive police officers will b e pern11 1t ed t o change from th e ICMA·
Retiremenl Co rp o r,1ti o n (ICMA-RC) Money Purchas e Plan to th e Fi re. anrl Polic e PP.o<ion Assnci at inn (t'PPA)
•
and the ICMA·R C Money Pur chase Plan ior Pol.cc will cl ose to new 1>a rti cipants as of M ay 201 3. Exisling
employee s 1tM y el ec t to remain in 1he ICMA-RC M one y Purcha se Pl t,n .
BACKGROUND, ANA LYS IS , AN D ALTIRNA TI VES IDE NTIFIED
Colnrado Revised Statut es. 3 1·3 1-1 10 I and 31 •.l 1 • 1103 provide tlw City of En glewood may elec t to cowr
all newly hi red Police Office rs under 1h e rrrA Ddint:d Ot:r,e(n Sy:,l\•111 ..1d 111i niste1t•J l,v th ~ t=PPA in tieu uf
coverage under th e IC ,'v1A -RC Money Purchas ~ Plan .
D uring Eng lc \.v ood Po lice Bene fit A ssoci a tion {EP G1\) coI1lra c: nego tiati on s it w,1 " d eIenn1n ed th .t i all n ewly
hired Police Otficers shal l participate in the FPPA Stdtewide D efin ed Benefi t Plan b egin·11 ,,g M ill' 201 3 for
N ew Hir es . All current members of the ICMA Re tir emen t Corµorc1tion /.1011 ey Pur cha sP Pl an m,1 y
individuall y c lccl tc p,1rticip ,1tc in ,he FPPA D efin ed Ae nefil Sys tem or m.i y re 111.iin in the ICM,\ Re tir e m ent
CorpcJ rati on M oney Pur chase Plan .
fhe cont ri'J uti on leve ls fo r current po c officers will rr111.1 111 i'lt te n pe rce nt employer and ten p ercent
empl oye t ior acti ve emp lo)·ees. The l.0nlrilJuti on leve ls for ne\" poli c-e offi ce rs st~r tIng ,tit er the eff ec t1vl~
da le will be eight percent emp loye r ano eigh t perce nt emp loyee . ConI11hu I1o n lc·v eb iHC' set d1JItn 15
co11tr ac t negotiat io ns .
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The Ci ty's Ge neral Fund w,11 rea liz e so m e savi ngs fro m trade-o ffs negoti ate d w ith th e tng'ewood Poli ce
Benefits As,ociation earli er this \'ear. Additional savings will be ,ealized in the future as 1:w cost of
providine pension benefits fo r new employee s w ill be recbced (t he empl o\•er c ontribut1 or, ri\te is r~duced
by two p ercent for r .ew employees).
I.ISTOF ATrACHMENTS
PwpuseU (nu 11 •l;i;1tlir1g) l t;'!:,O lutio,1
•
•
•
•
•
•
RESOLUT ION NO.
SERIES OF 2012
A RESOLUT IO N REQUESTIN G COVERAGE UNDER THE FPPA DEFlNED BENEF IT
SYST EM ADMINISTE RJ:D BY TH E FIRE AND PO LI CE PENSION ASSOCIATION FO R
'.'IEW l'OLI CI:: OfflCl::RS l·O K THE CITY UF ENULEWUULJ AN D l'KUVWI NU ACTIVE
POLI CE OFF ICE RS THE OPTI ON TO PARTICIPATE IN THE FIRE AND POLICE
ASSOCI.U IOK flEFIN ED BEN EF IT SY STE M.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Co lorad o Revised S1a tut cs, 31-3 I -I 10 I and 3 I .3 I• I 10 3 the City of
Eng:c,voo d may elect lo co ver nil new ly hired Polic t.: Oft kcrs under th e FPl>A Dclin ecl Bcnclit
Sys lcm admi ni stert'd hy 1h e Fire and Poli ce Pen sio n As so ciati on (FPPA) in li eu of covera ge
un der th e !C'MA Rctircmcnl Corp ora11011 Money Purc ha se Plan ; mid
WHEREAS. after considera ti on of1his ma tt t:r th ~ Cit y o f E11glewoo d ha s detennined to hav e
all new ly hired Pol ice O ffi ce rs meeting the definition of Member und er Co lora do Revi sed
Sta tute s 3 1-31 -102 pnnicipatc in the Stmcwid~ De lined Bene lit Plan beginning on th e Effective
Date fo r Ne w Hires, as defined h<:rcin ; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Co lor.ido Re vised Sta1 ute s 31-31-1101(3 .5) and 3 1-31-1103 ( l )(c)(S),
:i ll current membe rs of the ICMA Rc1ircmc11t Co rp orati on Mon ey Purchase Plan ma y individu all y
elec t to panicipate in the FPPA Defined Bcnefi1 System or ma y remmn in the JCMA Retire ment
Co rporati on Mone y P.m:hasc Plan. and
WH EREAS, as a result of Englewood Poli ce Benefit As socia1ion (EPll :\) co ntract
ncg otiat i,,ns the City of Eng lewood Ci ty Council dctennined to tnke th e fo ll ow in g ae1ior..
NOW, TH EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENG LEWOOD . COLO RADO. AS FO LL OWS
S,c1 ion I . The City o f En glewood hereby req ue s1s th at the Effec ti\'e Dat e of coverage be Ma y
20, 20 13
Sec tior. 2. The Membe r and Emplo yer cont ribu tion ra t< to the FPP.'\ Def ined Benelit S ys tem
for f\tcmbcrs wh o arc .tcti vc in the Statewide Hyb ri d Plan and who selectt:d eitl11;~r th~ Defined
Benefi t Co mp one nt and Money Purc ha se Component nr 1h c Money Pu rcha se C0 mp oncnt o nly nn
the Ma y 20. 20 13 will be 20% of base sa lary and shall be spli t 10% mem ber and 10% empl oyer.
Sc,:ti on 3. T he Emp loyer elec t~ tu offer th e Mr.:m hr.:rs who arc act1vr.: pri or t0 the Effective
Daic fo r N\.!w J lin:s the o pti0 n o f t,1.trt ici pn tin g in lhc St atewid e Ddinc<l Oi..:111.:fit ;:'Ja n at a
con tribut1 m1 rntc of 20% of ha sc s.1 bry 1ha t shall be split 10% meinber and 10% emplo yer .
Sec ti on 4. The Cit y of Eng lew ood ele cts tu cowr a ll Mem bers hired on or alter Ma y 20, 201 3.
sur.:h ea rlier dat e aft er !h e filin g o f th e Ccnificn ti nn nf Co mplian ce designated by th e Ern nl c,yc r
(~nCl \\'I\ he rei n as th e Effe ctive D.ne fo r N~w Hire s), under 1h c Statew ide Defi ned Bepcfll Pl an al
a r.:0 111ributi('ll rat(' of 16% of base :m lm;>' 1ha1 shall he split . ¼ Empl oyer and 8% Member .
Section 5. The En:ployer intends 10 transfe r some or all of the current active Member 's
ac.:ount balances 10 FPPA 10 the Monev Purchase Component of the Statewide Hybrid Plan . The
Employer does not intend 10 transfer retired Members' accow:t ballllccs 10 the Money Purchase
Component of the Statewide I-lyhrici Pinn . The Emp loyer doe; not intend to transfer 1he 100%
ve sted lna clivc Members' account balances to the Money Purchase Cnrnponcnl of the Statewide
Hybrid Plan.
Section 6. The Memhcr"s employer acl:oums shal l be 100% v~s ted upon transfer to the FPPA
Defined l:lencft1 System .
~-TI,e Local Money Purchase Plan pro\'ides for Jo..,,s to Plan members . Loans 10
Pl an members shall be transferred 10 the Money Purcha se Comp onent as pan of the 1ra:1s fer of
as;ets of the Lo ca l Mcmey Purchase Pinn. subject to approval and acccptanc.c by FPPA . No new
loan s will be allowed from December 31, 20 12 10 May 20, }OL\
Sec tion R. The Employer acknowlcdgl!s thn1 the. election for cove rage under the FPPA
Defined Bcucfil System is irn.:vvi..:aUlc 011cc thc final Cc11ifica1ion ofComp1ian..-:e 1s filed l>y the
employer and approved by FPPA.
Section 9. Pan-time police officers, hired by the Ci ty of Englewood after the Effective Date
shall 1101 participate in the Plan . Part-time police o fficers employed by the City of Englewood on
the Effective Da te ma y not individuall y elect to partic ipate in the Fl'PA Defoed flcnetil System.
•
Section 10 . In ;;idditi on to this Resol uti on, the City of Englewood und ers tands th:11 it must •
make the cer1ificati{', . <.:ont:iincd m the ·'Fom1 of Ccrtifica1ion of Compliance" attached hereto as
Exhibi t A ,md which must be completed as the final Ccnificotion of Compliance by the cmpln:-,cr .
Eulry i11Lo Lh c FPPA Ddim:J Bc.:11cfit System is no t co 11 1pktc and fina l w1tll th e Ce11itica1ion is
made and filed with FPPA .
Section 11. DISCLOSURE STATEMENT -·,·he City of Englewood , in co njuncti on with
FPPA, wi!I prepare a disclosure statement ,1,:lU ch comparc::s 1he mai'n provisions of 1he Local
Money Purch"se Plan and the P!Jn or !'ions ofiered under the FPPA Defined Benefit Svstcm, as
ilpph ca hlc. Said disclnsurr. '-1:'ltemcnt will he su hm11t erl to FPPA for :ippro\'al. Th e F.rnplo yer
w :11 submit the :..ippro ved disclosure stateme nt 10 all eli gib le !llL'lllhtrs pri or to the deadhne, fur
makmg ind:'-idu .11 elections.
Scctiun 12. MEMBER SELECTION -~1 cu11j w1 ctiu11 wi th FPPA, th< Cit y uf Eng lcwuuu
shall implemcnl a procedu re for making indi,·idual sc lcd io ns of Pian options for all eligible
member s pur su.1nt to the mies and pro1.:edures esta bli shed hy Fl'P A.
·111e Ci t~ oi Eng lewood unde rs1an ds thal if the Ct!rtificauon of comp lian ce for co,•erage under
the FP PA Defined flcncfit Sys tem is accep ted. all future member, o f th e Police Depanmcnt wh o
would h;wt-bee ,: covrrrci unrlcr lh c I n:al Mnne:-, Pur ch:1 se Pla n, will he cn vcrccl unde r the
Sti-Hcwide Defined Bcn c:lit Pl.in oi the FPPA Defined Benefit System .
•
•
•
•
·niat this re so luti on otintent shall be ccnificd and tran sm itted to FPPA for processing in
accordance with all applicable law and regulations as pan of the application process .
ADOPTED AND APPROVED tills 17t h da y of Scptc111hcr, !012.
ATI'EST:
Randy P Penn . Mayor
Lo11crishia A. Elli s, Cit)' C lerk
!, Loucr 'shia A. Elli s. City Clerk ft1 r the City of t:.nglcwood. Col o ·"· her eby ccnil'y the
above is a true copy of Re so lution No __ . Series of 2012 .
Loucri shi a A. El.,s, City Clerk
3
•
Exhibi 1 A
In order to comply with Colorado Re vised Starut es 31-3 1-1 JOI it is necessal) for Ci ty of Engl ewood
lu ceitify 1hc fo ilowing to the FPP A Baurd of Director~:
a) the City of Englewo od police Department 's Loca l Money Purchase Pl an meets th e qua lificati on
re qui rement s of th e Federa l "In terna l Revenue Code of 1986" that are applicable to governmental
plans ; '
b) by se parate ac ti on Cit y of Euglewood has adn pt erl a Res oluti on to partia ll y terminate
pan icipation in the Local.M on ey Purch as e.Plan in .ac co rdance wi th .the terms o f th at pl an;
c) :he Reso lution pa rtiall y te rmi nating pa rti cip a:ion docs 1101 adv erse ly affect the qualified status of
the I .oca l Money Purch ase Pla n:
d) ·.he righ ts of the membe rs i:1 the Loc al Money Pur c hase Plan wh o were affected by the partial
te rmination of th ~ Loca l Money Purchase Plan to benefits accrued to the date o f termination are
non -fo rfc iuibl e:
c) acti\'e Members in th e Local Money Purchase Plan wh o have so elec te d (the Trar.sferred
Members ), as of the Effe ctiv e Date shall beco me Members in th e FPPA Defin ed Benefit Syste m;
I) the Empl oyer will transfer or caused to be tran sferred to the FPPA Defined Benefit System all
as sets of the Local Money Purchase Plan that are attr ibutable to the accrued benefits of the
• Tran sferred Members, pur suant to the procedure estab lish ed by the r::,·.y ,etiremcnt administration:
•
g) all Employer and empl oyee co ntributi ons required to be made to t ne Local Money Purchas e Plan as
of the date of the partial termination have been made ;
h) Transfr:red Members in the Local Money Purchase Plan shall not incur a red uction in their account
balances in th eir Local Mone y Pu rchase Plan , de termined .s o f the Effecti ve Date , as a result of
their tran sfe r to the FPPA Defined Benefit System. For vestin,:. purpose s with regard to the Local
Mone y Purchase Plan accou~t balance s and wi th regard to the MP component of the FPPA Defined
Benefit Sy stem, years o f service in th e Loca l Money Purchase Plan shall be combined with Years
of Service m the Ml-' Component of the FPPA Defined Benefit Syste m . For ves tin g purpose s with
regard to the DB comp onent of th e FPPA De fi ned Ben efit System, Years of Service Credit shall be
based upon service credit e ither earned or purcha se d while in the FPPA Defin ed Bc11cf1 1 Syst em ,
and
i) TI1e Emp1 °ye r agree s to panicipate in the FPPA Defined Benefi t System and 10 be bound by the
term s of 11,e FPPA Defined Benefit System and the deci sions and ac1i u11s of the Board wi th re spect
to the FPPA Defi ned 3cncfit Sys tem.
j) All Membe rs hired on o r a fter May 20 , 20 13, the Effcct iv L Dale ior New Hire s, shall parti cipate in
the FP PA Defined Hencfi t System , as previously detcrn1 i11 cd b y th e Empl oyer
k) There are no outs, nding loa ns, li e::11s, ass ign111e11ts, court orde r in cluding domes tic rel o.:ionsh:p
orders, or oth er ty pes cf encumbran ces or any nature aga in s; any funds transforred lo the Sta tewide
Jc:i ned Benefit System by li )c Tru!)lec o f lhe lcc a! money purc hase plan, except th ose lo.in s to pbn
me:nbers as desc ri bed on Ex hi bit A. The em pl oye r will noti fy FPPA at th e ti me of transfer o f an)
pcndin1;; <lo rnc:~li L· 11;:lati onship o:·dc rs.
• COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Dale September I 7. 20 t 2 ·1-------Agenda llem
11 ~ vi
L _ . ----r
Subject: A Resol uti o n App •ov ing
F\'20 1 J Com rmmrt v D eveloprn cnl
Blo c k Gr.int Applica ti o n
INITIAlfD BY : Community De\'elopment I STAff SOURCE : H arold Still. Sen ior Planner
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
City Coun ci l has .ippr oved reso luti ons l o til e Co mmun ity D eve lopment Bl ock Grant (C D BG)
.1pplicat1ons .i lm os t an nua ll y •,mce 1977. Paruc ipa~ion in th e Ara pahoe Cou nt)· en111leme r11
prngrc1111 bega n 1n 199 1. Participati on is :iu 1ho,,,_ec1 in three -y ea r in creme11 1s . Ordin ance 2 .>, Sc>ri es
of 2012 . appro ved an Int e rgovernment a l Agr eement to part icipa te in th e Arap i1h oe C ounty
Co mm uni ty Dcvclup111 e111 Bl oc k G rd lll dlld HOME lr w i:Slrllt'lll P.:lllllt'l!>li iµ P1 og r.1111 s ro , fe der,l l
fiscal 1•ear s 20 13 thro ui::h 20 t 5.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
• Staff recommends th ,11 Council approve ;i reso lut io n ,mthori;,inf, "'"ff 1n ;i pply In Ar;t p;1hr-P rnunt y
lor the City of Englewood 's pmtion c,i fed eral fi sca l year 20 13 Communi ty Developm ent tll Jck
Grant (LUBC,) fund s.
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
Th e U . S. D ept. ol Housing and Urba n D evel o pment ;H U D ) CDBG Ent itl eme nt Pro gr ,1 m p rovi des
gran ts to tmits of loc al gov ernm ent a11d urb,1n cou111i es to mee t housing and com muni ly
dev elopment n ee ds. The objec tive of the program is t o enhan ce u rban communr ti es by providi ng:
• de ce nt, safe .ifford.:i blc hous ing ;
• imp1 ove d inu as tru cture ;
• public fa ci lit ies and se rvices ;
• economi c oppo ~tu111ti cs .
Th e Federa 1 Progr,11 11 objectives are ac hi eved thr ough pr o jec ts deve loped b y loca l govern ment s th at
prm1.1r ily ben efit low a.nd mod erate h co me fa mili es as we ll as ot her 1eder.1I o bjec ti ve s. The requ es t
fo r fund s 111d }' also includ e acli vities that mee t urg erit dev elopment needs ·n comm unities such as
damage from floodin g, t ornadoes, fire , etc. Loca l governments determine w hich activrtr es best
serve the obj ec ti ve s of th e proa,am
fonds are appr o p rr ated annually by the Congress ior th e CO BG p rogram and are allocated by statutory
• formula to ea ch entitlement area . Arapa hoe Coun ty is ar,proved as an urbdn cou nt y er,titl ement c1r ea . The
CDBG gr ant fund s ,He {:Urr entl y di s1ri bL1t ed 10 pa rti ipa ling cities \•vi:hin ;\r,tpahu~ Cou nt y. E,u. .. h •
parti cip atinlt c1 ty receives a set-a side por ti on oi th e 10 1 .. ,1 LDB G all oc ,1t1on. Th e curr en t pMt ici pating cit ies
are t:1e Cities of Engl ewood. Littleto n, Sh erida n, Glenda le. D ee r Tra il, and Greenwovd Village . The nrndmg
leve l for th e City 0 1 En glewoo J fo r FY2 0 13 is an ticbat e d to b e S 150,000. the same as it wa, for 20 1 ~-
Appli cati ons fo r c;-ic h µrepos ed prnject ,.,-:ust be submilt ed to Ara pah ot:> Co unty no later th,m
O ctobe r 29, 20 11. in ord er to rP .. e r\'C 20 13 C D BG funding. The Jppli c.1tio,s io r the Ci ty of
Engle\\uucJ w 'II be fo r a tut,11 uf S 150,000.00. Engl ewood s l"Y2013 pro gram con sists of thr ee
pro je cts . These pro1ec :s continue to m eet curren t housi ng an d neig hb or h ood nee ds benefitting
low and modera t e incom e iamilies. All pr o jects are sJbJec t to addiu onal rev re\\' by City star f,
Ar apahoe Co unty CDBG adrr.in istr ato rs an d th e County Co mmissi one rs The li st ~d p ro je cts an d
funding leve ls 111 ,1)" ch,mge base d o n th os e revi ews FY 20 13 CDBG i11ncl s will b e re qu es ted fo r the
follow in g p rojec t s:
1) S I 00.000 fo r ar energv efficie ncy horn e h l prt ·veme1 jts prnj ec• fon.si ng on
improvernenb ti'1~1t provid e in cr ~a sl!cl energy efll ciency in th e hrn 11 e;
~) $~ 7 . 500 to 1or th e H ousin g Reh,1bilitdt b 11 Proje ct l o pr U\1id e loans to low•in co me
hor e owne rs to fi na nce th e costs oi ma jor h1u seho1d repair s and improvement s. Thi s
Prnjt,c t ;i lc;,n in chu lr--s .i !Mnc1),m,1 n/~111,1l l rehab componen t I<: ass is t se niors and disab led
pt>rsuns w ith th t• cos ts of rrnnor hou!t eho ld r pa ir~;
3) $22 ,500 fur d tl1i1t et=nl h yea, requ~st to t1 a r~s fe r t1 por ti on oi th e Ciw 's CDB G all oc ati on
to direc tl y Jund th e F.m,il y Tr e " ,1ppli cat ion lh,H J.ssist s wi th staff ing ne ed~ fur tli t! H uu~~
of H o pe homeless shel te r. l-c1m1l y lree will subrrnl .:111 app li ca ti on di rec tl y to Ar,1p,1h oe
County for the grant . A lett er of sponso rsh ip is onl y requ 11e d fro s , the City to suppo rt
Fam ily Tr ee's appli ca ti o n to A ra pahoe Count y.
FINANCIAi. IMPACT
Ex istin g Community D ev elopment staff will \,dm 1nlster th e p ·opose d pro jec ts. Sta ff ~.il ari es .:u1d
bendits repr ese nl t1 1e City's pa rt icipa ti on m tl 1e pro1ec 1s.
LIST OF A Tl ACHMFNTS
•
•
• RESOLUTION NO .
•
•
SERI ES OF !012
A RESOLL"TION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO, TO FILE
APPLI CATI ONS wm-1 ARAP \HOE COUNTY FOR A !O I 3 co ~ ML "NITY
DEVELO PM ENT BLO CK GRANT .
\VH F.RF.A S, th e F.ng lewoorl C ity Cou nc il has approved CDfKi nrrli ca ti ons si nc e 1977 and
approved the ex ec uti on of an lI1tergove mmental Agreement with the pa~sage of Ordin ance
No . 37. Series of 1991. covcr'ng the City's panicipation in the Arapahoe Co unt y CD BG
Entitlement Pro gram for funding yea rs I 99 2 throu gh I 994; and
WHER EAS , the Eng lewoo d C it y Co un cil nppro ve d pass age of Ordinance No. 13, Series o f
200 6, autborizi ng the: executi on ot an [nterg ovcmmcnta l Ag reement betwee n the City of
Englewood and Arapahoe Co unty covering parti cipati on in 1h e Arap ahoe Co unty CDBG
Entitl ement Pro gram for fun ding yea rs 2007 thro ugh 20nQ; and
WH EREAS . th e Englewood C it y Co un cil ary pro vcd pa ssage of Ordinance :-Jo. :!2, Se ries of
10 09 . auth orizini:: th e execution of an Intergovernm ent al Agreement between the City of
Englewood and Arapahoe Co unt y coveting participati on in the Ar apahc,e Co wtl y COBG Progra m
and HOME inv estm ent Partners hip Program s for fcdcrnl fi scal ycn rs 20 10 through 201:!; nnd
WHEREAS. the Englewood City Council ap proved pass age of Ordinance ~o. 25 , Series of
2012 . authorizing the exrcu1i on of :m lntergovemrn e111nl Agrecmen1 hc1wccn ·hl" r.i ty nf ··
Eng lc w@ d and Ar apahoe Cou nt y covering parti1.:ipat ion in the A,-:1 r,ahoe Count y CD BG Program
and HOME Investment Pannerslup Programs for federal fi scal year 2013 th ro ugh 2015; and
WHEREAS. the Arapahoe Co unty Co mmuni ty Oevc lopm en l ht,,d Gra nt Program pro vide s
1:,rrant s to participating mun icipalities to meet housing nnd CC'ffilm.mi1y de,·e lopr.1ent need 5; and
WHEREAS, lo compete in the Arapahoe Co unt y Community Devel opment Blo ck Grant
Prnb,rram . }oL·~l government.> mus t mbmit an ~pplic :ltion ; and
'.V HEREAS , th e Cit y of Engle woo d has recei ved a noti ce of fund availahility; and
\VH EKl:AS. the City of E,.;lew ood. Co lorado. desi res to appl y for th ese funds th ro ugh the
Ar.1pa hoc Co u11t y 2013 Co mmunit y Dc vcl Clpm cnt 131 0..:k Grant to fund th e Ent:r gy Effici en cy
Englewood ProJCCI , Housi ng Rehabi lita tion Projc'C I. a n<l House of Hope staffin g projec t.
NOW , THEREF ORE. BE IT RViOLVED BY TH E CITY COUNC'I L OF TH E C IT Y OF
ENG LEWOOD. COLO RADO , THAT :
Section I. The Ci ty vf Engl .·woo d. Cr•l orado . is hc:rt::b y "u thori zed to file a~ pli c:ar in nr. fo r an
Ara pahoe Co unty 20 I 3 Commumty Deve lo pm en t Bl ock Grant.
fu,cuon 2. The Mayor and City Clerk ar c authorized to sign and attest all necess ary fomis.
docwnents , assurances and certifications!~, 1l1.c c.....01tu1illnity Deve lopment lilock Grant
appli•~ations for and on hehal f of the Ci ty Cow1c il and the City of Englewood.
DOPTED AND APPROVED this 17th day of Septrmber, 20 12 .
i\HEST:
Randy P. Pem1 1 Mayor
Louerishio A. Ellis . City Clerk
I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, Ci ty Clerk for the Cit y of Englew ood . Colocado, hereby certify the
abO\t: 1s a true copy of Resoluti on No. __ , Seric:s of ~Ol:!.
Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk
•
•
•
•
•
Me m nra nrlum of Und erst:1 n d iog
So uth M e tro De nv e r A nimal S h e lter Optio11s
WHERE.AS. the juris di:ti ons of Cit) oi Liltlct ou, Cit) of Cc11 t::w1 ial.. Cny u f Cl,c:11') fli l'.s V 1U11ge,
Town of Bo·, Mor, Town of Co lumbrne Valley. Cay of Shcr ilaa, Cit y of En glew ood, City of Lone Tr ee,
Town of P:::irl.c r, and .l\.rapuhoc County. :iU loc :ued !n the sou th metro Denver re gion, (coll:."ctn•el)
hereina fter "South Denver Mcuo J urisdiction s"} prov ide anUn .tl control (wt:lfare ) sc rvJc es that in\'olvc th··
1mpnun dmg of n.r umn ls;
Wl1 EHEA S, tbc So uth Denver Metro Ju ~s dic llc,ns promote rcsp011S ible ptt own:::rship , bum nn e
treatment of animnls and pro,.,ide nni:u nl sheltering scr.11 cc throu gh !he cn for c:::meut of theu aru ai.'l l law s
WHEREAS, the So uth Den\'er tv1cuo Juri stl iL:tiL1u:, liuJ u11 111 \.il 1,..uuuul w,1 vi\;t:::. sli uul d l 11: p1uv1dc J
ma fisc all y :-csponsiU lt ma nn er, including the sheltering of urumuls ;
WH ERl:.AS, Lhcr-: is no singl :: full s~·rvice anim tl sheller foc 1Jscd on UH· n:s1deuts o f tlle Sou th
J") nvcwr Mello .luri sdictt ons that prov:C::s ,tciopt ion and mht..-r scr\'iCe.Ci Ii.kc the Dcp.,,.cr Dum b Fricuis Lcil .~C
(D1-1-J 111 Deaver, the B uddy Center :., Ccstle Roc k (afljl,atcd with t,c DFL), th e Foothi ll, Ate mul She lt er
in Golden fo r th e we st De nver metro arcn comm uniti es md 1be Aurora A.mma l S hdte:-in A11 wra,
WHEREAS, the Hu mane Soc iety ol ti;, South Plau e Valley ("HSS PV") init ia te d oper.uio us m 2009
wi th fo ndin g from 1bc Citic!, oi Lntl eton ar.d Englewood and has grow n to serve Arapaho~ Co unty;
,l'l lCRI.AS, J.lthougb ! ISS PV has pro vi ded vn lunblc full 3C r.ice udopt.i on :;c,rv 1.:e ~ sin ce opcn i.n g 11!.
doo r-s , it hn s 1101 dcmvns:rated th e abilit y to ra ise funds :o cover the cos ts for arlo ption servi c~s a.nd bns
grown mr-rc reliant upon contr.1 c:1s with pa11 icip :1t in g local Jll n~di c-tion .,;
WHEREA S. ther e co ntim.cs 10 b: an unmet need fo r co nve nient ad opti on scrv i1..cs in t 11e South
Dei1ve r Me tro Ju!"sdjr..:rion s tba t do not re ly upon pu bli c d.o ll urs for day~to-d:iy op eration s an ·l services;
WHEREAS, the South Denver Me tr ~ JunsdJctJou s believe co ord1naung clfons on a ful l scrnce
unim2l sb.chcr shoul t increase rc5.po usib lc pet ownership and iivc re l:.:use r me of animals across all of our
c{J rumull!ties whi le also improving cost efficien cy Md eUm innring durlicatiun ur :,,:;rvi 1.:c..:s , tUJJ.
WHERE.::)·, ·here is n wi lli ogne:;;5 by the So uth Denv:; ~1crro Jmir.dictio ns to c~:p lorc the-rnu gc of
opuons :1,•,1ilo.blc for an.inml shc-11-.:rin g servi ces.
BE!TKNO JrN1HA1:
Thi s Mcmornn:iun1 of Uuderst.1udw g dow:nc ot s the 1n1cnt or the . S:m th Dcm1c:-l\•fe:ro
Jur isdicti ons to ;>X plort: tl 1c :-:m gr of opll c.rt s avi1 1lablc for a nimal shelteri ng s~rn(.;es
Each uud :!r!"ig n;:d membe r of Ute So ut b Dcuv::r Mc ·10 Ju nsd 1ct1 ons 1111cncll: to parti c1p:-!.tc in tllC'
ex:p lo1attcn of ammal shdteri ug O?lions a\·aila'.>le to :h:: South Den ve r Mt:tw JuriM.lit.:l io us
3. A.ll /\Jl itr:a] S iu.:lt e1 Crnu 11 11 u cc will b: fo1111:.:d aul the C 1tv of L1t1 k 1on siwll serve us 1hc
coo rdinntm g partuer ·r he purpos~ of th is com m.itte~ ,,.11 11 be ~d v iso:y . lt wi ll cx.pl urc po1 cnual
~crvice del ivery morielt fo r .:mima1 sheltering, rmgins from J rc-g,ona! iu l l~serv1c::: :m1m:-il -.he lte r In
a cJ mbi nattoa vf pn·:a te kennels. lt will g:1.1 bcr nnunn l s:n.h s t1 s frm:1 each participntin£ South
Denver Metro Jun sd 1cnon This CJ m1111nce will be dis~olve d upoa 1h ::: pr'!scntauon oi lh e 1esea1ch
on A.1Hm4ll Sb::: tc1 oruons to :b ~ elected hoC:1~s of the South De nver \,'ietro Junsd 1cti ons , unirss
!.om~ m :ill of the-members ::igrce t('I cm mu~ coordirat..:d effo rt s
13 a
4 T he co n m 1011 \':t!t 1c~ arnunJ uni.uul v.i.:lfu1 t <1 11.:
prnmoung res ponsible pc t ow ners hip ,
huirmnc treatment of,111im!i ls. and
prcv 1d111 g arnmal shclterm~ scmci: m n fi sca ll y rcsp:;mc;1b lc ·1mnncr
S. 111 add i11 011 10 actu al scrv1cc c1chvery opt1ons, the fo cus of So .1tl : Dc 11 vc1 lv1ctto .lum cl 1,.:t1on~
cJord1 11ati o11 nr.d ~he Anim nl Shelter Commi ttee wi ll cn co mpnss cx.J•lo:-ing th e c>.tstmg n11 1m;il
~:1c l1.:.nmi nmmgcmcnts, 1ncludin~cost:; imd in 1pou u:J nn1 111al st;:ius t1cs, by j ur1s di::tion
In !.i!,!mf),ine rhi s h1 cntio n :rnd co mm iu:1cnt. '.mch ,.mdc rs iened member of the Sou th Dc:nvc . Metro
J·.,1r isdu:1 ions 11l cJgcs to
n. Dc:;:gnu t~ one clc::.tcd and !:tnff r~pr !:sc:..iuiti ves (andlo: 01h. ::llcrnate rc::;::scn t:ni ve) to
part1c1pn tc on tli c Au imal Shelte r co mm ittee, :md cn:;urc that the rcprc~enta uvc!:: :m~nd
rc.g ulnrl y sched uled rn cc :ings of Lhc A1111 :m1 Shelt er pfClj ::ct 1111d .11 e :icl 1\C 111 li 1c func1 1rn :mg of
tb: i\mmu l Sln;llr.:1 t.:l11 11 111 1Ucc, subjccl IJ reasomi blc aqu (obiliiy of dcctcd or Jdn1 i11 1slrattvc.
p Cl'SOW \CI l O S!r"\C l\S rcprcscntll\h L'S
l:. Prov ide meetin g s1,ucc f:-ir the Animn ! Shchc1 Co mm 1t tt.:c ml!ct111i;s, as m·~U:;d un d :-.ubJt.:Ll t,.1
a·,a il :tt,il :ty of spnC'! tul d UYnllablc 1C!;O\Uccs of tile Mw·:c ipalny/Ci1y/Cau:ll y.
•
c. Pro·ndc ucc urnu: nn muL wcl:urc: stull !lt1cs fr::>m 2009 1md th ro u gh .:!OJ l. mcl'Jd mg, but nc,t
litni tc:d to , num ber of nn imnls 1:,,pmmd:d on nnnual b:i.s1s, costs mcmTcd for 1l1cs c sc :-v1cc!i,
revenu e ge nerated from fees fro m owne rs wh o cloi mc d impou nded n:iimn is. Th :s will s::rve DS
,1 bnsc ns to th e cu:-rcal pln v~l!; fi eld from w:l icb so m e prqjcction s co uld be !Tif'dc. I-ISSP\''s •
pcrfo m,ancc wi il li e evu\unkd spccificn!ly, in cludlop,. but nOl limit~d lo, rcve nu : by so urce
ov"r 2009 , '.!O IO nnd 201 1 anl ado;,tcd '.!0 : 2 bud get.
d. T1 m~frmn c for .be A111111 nl Shche:-Cor.,mill f':t-1n C'<'l mpll'lle ,t~ rMrnrr.h 1m<l hnve in rhv du:i.l
members pn:scm th is i.n fo n na ti o1110 their ies pe cti vc elec ted :>O dy withi n six months fr om d:l ir
o f exec uti on of th i:; MO U by nil Sm1lh D::.:nve r Metr o J uri~clictiou s
T iu; tt:1m ufth c MOU shall be througll Scpter:.bcr 30,201 l lt maybe cHc1idcd rort\\O .1dd i1ionnl
0 nc yenr pe riods upon agr~c:rn:rnl oftl1;: pa rt i;,;s.
S ig,ning this Mcmornndu m of Cndcrsta ndmg docs not s i [!nify n co mrntlmc1 11 vf any 1nd1\·1duul
juri sd1 ct1 on ~o · (a) m:tl:c &t1 y Jb1mc 1al co nt nb uu on lo pan1c1p::.lc: other tlmn as muy J C mcitknt:ll to
lhc con muuncnts s:t fo rth in plrngr:ipl 6; (b) move beyo nd nn cx.p lorallon of ammaJ shclt~r
o rtmns , or (c) fund or panicipate iu o re~i onn.l :m1m al shelter should so me mcn,bers of th e Sou th
Denver Metro Ju risdictions elec t to move forward wi 1 s uc1 JJ1 o pti on.
o Any pnr ty nrny un ila1crn ll y lcnn in :1te th is Mr.nl()rnnch11n of Undcrstand i nl! fo r nny nr no rcru:on
w 1t.h =i JO dn y written notice sent via rcbru.nr m:ii l ::,r hand ck\1vcry \(l the 1cpr • cn1,1ti,,cs of rh~ o t/1cr
So uth Denver M~tro Juri r.d i~tmns .
•