The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989 Ordinance No. 005CIUlINl\10: NO. .£ SERIFS OF 1989 BY AlfflDUT\' caJOCIL BILL NO. 4 INmCilUCED BY caJOCIL MEMBER IIABE2UCrr AN CIU>INAID: APPRO'JIIK. !IN INl'ERGO'JllR1'1fNrAL l\GREEl-ll:Nr BE:lWEEN THE CITY OF m:.LElaD AND ARAPAIU CXXffl"i OOARD OF OXJ!m' CXMlISSIOOERS FOR OM>l1l'ER PRO'.,Rl\M TO PROVIDE PROPERTY G-lNEI1SHIP LISTS TO TIIE CITY FOR PAVING DISTRICTS . l'i!_~, the City has received property C7wl'\ership lists for Paving Districts fran Arapahoe County since 1956; and WHEREAS, in 1,06, the County changed ca,puter systems, and the City has requested that a new catpUter program be wr i tten to provide information en property crwners, legal description, property address and PPI n\J!Der of those properties in Paving Districts; IOI, THEREFORE BE IT aJll\INED BY 'lllE CIT\' CXXN:IL OF 'lllE CITY OF ~, OLCIWXl, 'll!AT: Section l. 'lbe Sc '.tware Developnent ~t for Governmental Entities het>.>!en the Board of County Camlissioners ofCounty of Arapahoe, State of Colorado , and the City of Engl&uod is hereby approved. Said Agreeirent generally contains the following: l. County shall cevelop a program/ software to provide public informati on requested by the City, l<tlich program/software shall remain the proi:,erty of the County. 2. Program/software will be carpatible with County's existing ca,puter and related software, but County is under no cbligation or duty to develop a new program/sof.tware for City should County replace its existing cx:rrputer or related software that would not be ooopatible. 3. City agrees to pay to County an estimated cost of $1,372 for develq:inent of the program/software. Should develqm,nt costs exceed the estimate, City shall be ootified and have the option to terminate the agreeirent or to pay the additional costs. 4. County agrees to run the program/software at current productior, charge rates at the expense of the City. S. 'lbe agreeirent may be trodi.fied by the parties only in writing by mutual agreeirent. Introcfuced, read in full , and passed on first reading en the 3rd day of January .. 1989. Published as a Bill for an Ordina.'lCe on the 4th day of January, 1988. Read by title and passed on final reading oo the 16th day of January, 1989. ✓- Published by title as ordinance No • ..i:2._, Series of 1989, on the 18th day of Januaxy, 1989. Attest: ~4ftc<-0 J&1 -~-µ,J Patrc a H. crow, City Clerk I, Patricia H. crow, City Clerk for the City of En;lewood, Colorado, hereby certify the above and foregoing is a true c.:ipy of tbe ordinance passed on final reading Md published by title' as ordinance No. ~' Series of 1989. /J.J-.. JI/) r 14luc:< A-w . ~~ a. Patricia H. Crow • e SOFI'WI\RE IEVELOR!Em' AGREDlml' ~ GOVERNHEm'AL ENlTl'llS 'I1{l5 .I\GRm!ENI' is entered into by an:! between the OOARD OF OXJNl"i CXH{ISSIOOERS OF 'll!E CWlffl( OF ARllPARlE, STATE OF CDI.OIWXl (hereinafter referred to as a:iunty) an:! City of Erplewood (hereinafter referred to as the "PUrt:haser") • WHERFAS, the oounty, plrSU81lt to 0:>lorado statutes, provides information contained in the piblic reoords for utilization by the PUrt:haser; and WHERFAS, the l?Urt:haser desires to d:ltain said information in a different format and is willing to pay to the a:iunty the costs associated with the developnent of a progranVsoftware by the 0:Junty to provide said information in another format. NCM, 'IHEREFORE IT IS l\GREEll by the a:iunty ard the PUrchaser as follows: 1. 'Ihe 0:Junty shall develop a progranVsoftware to provide the piblic information requested by the PUrt:haser in a fornat acceptable to the l?Urchaser. (See Exhibit A for Project Request ard Project Scope statement) 2. 'Ihe PUrchaser ~ that the progranVsoftware developed by the 0:Junty ard all rights ard title hereto, shall be an:! shall remain the property of the eoonty. 3. 'Ihe progranVsoftware JraY be developed by the 0:IJnty by utilization of eoonty Data Processing personnel or by utilization of an in:lependent contractor selected by the COOnty . 4. 'Ihe PUrchaser understands ard agrees that the prograi,Vsoftware developed pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed at the convenience of the eoonty . 'Ihe eoonty makes no representations or guarantees regal.'ding the t:imP. of OCJ1Jlletion of develcpnent for the progranVsoftware. 5. 'Ihe eoonty warrants that the progranVsoftware i:,ursuant to this Agreement will be o:J1l)8ti.ble with the c.ounty•s existing cx:rrp..1ter am related software at the time the so. tware is developed. 'Ille COOnty makes no other warranty, express or inpliec1 6. 'Ihe Q:IJnty resezves the right to replace its existing carp..1ter ( or related software) ard if said replacement caiprt:er (or related software) is not oarpatible with the progranVsoftware as developed pursuant to this l\greement, the eoonty wruld be lllx:lPr rr, cbligation or duty to develop a new progranVsoftware for the PUrchaser. 7. 'Ihe Purchaser agrees to pay the COOnty the sum of .il.]]2...QQ for the developnent of the progranVsoftware. Pay,rents shall be Jrade as foll.-: ,\, 50% of the total (~) shall be paid within 30 days of the exea.ition of this !\q':eement. b . 251 of the total (~) shall be paid within §l1 days of exe:::utioo of this ~t. c, 'lbe balance of 251 of the total (illLQQ) shall be paid "'1en the County inforns the PUrchaser that the progrm,Vsoftware is 1'ully q,eratiallll • a. 'lbe Purchaser unclerstan:ls that the total oost (~) as .set forth in paragraph 7 herein is ally an estimated oost for the developnent of the progranVsoftware. It, after ocmenoement of the work hen!urder, the County deteimines that the developrent oost will exceed the estimated MOJnt as set forth in paragraph 7 herein, the PUrchaser shall be notified of said a&litiooal costs an:! will, at that tine, have the cptioo to imnediately terminate this Agreement or to agree to p.,y said adclitiooal oosts. If the PUrchaser decides to imnecliately terminate this ~t, the <nmt-t agrees to retune! the aJ10Jllt of fllrds paid widl exceed the oosts incurrecl by the 0:1.lnty to date of teminatioo. 9, After developrent, the 0:1.lnty agrees to run the progranVsoftware at rurrent pro:ructioo char.Je rates at the eicpense of the Purchaser. 'lbe 0:1.lnty retains the right to schedule and run the progranVsoftware at its diacretia., pirsuant to <nmty needs . 10. 'lbe Agreement may be nooified by the parties only in writing upon nutual ;.,ireement. ATI'EST: ATI'EST : Marjorie Page Clerk of the 6oard in>.RD OF CXXJtllY a:r-t!ISSIONERS cnJNl'i Cf' ARAPAHOE , srATE OF (DI.ORAJX) Chainnan Date *** SCOPE STATEMENT*** PROJECT Z0880156 PROGRAMMER/ANALYST: Steve Manro PROBLEM STATEMENT: A request baa been ma de to include situ ■ address on the output report from job Z0201, SOLUTION: Chan1e pro1ram ZG9000AC to write the situs address from the PARC record to the output report. PROCEDURE : ·A, Copy current production veraion of ZG9000AC to the teat lib~aries, B, Make the necessary chan1es to ZG9000AC to meet user requirements, C, Teat the pro1ram to ensure it produces the proper results, D. Document the pro1ra■ IAW departmental standards. E, Mnve the proiram and its associated J CL to production, DATE Jo.,•1ary 3 , 1989 '"1 UATED BY ACUON PKO?OSED COUNCIL COIIMUNICATION AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT 11 (e) IH r:!c tor of Engineering Se rvices Intergovernmental Agreement for Computer Services Pa r..s age of Ordinance approving Software Development Ag r e e ment wlth Arapahoe County for computer services . BACKGROUND Since 1956 , the City has requested and received property ownership lists for Paving - Districts . Until 1986, these lists included : name and mailing a1dress of property owner, property legal description, property address and PPI number . In 1986, Arapa• hoe County changed computer systems and the City requested that a new computer pro - gram be written to provide the above-named information. However, the lists obtained in 1987 and 1988 were missing t he prope rty address which mean t these addresses had to be researched by hand . The property addr-?s s is utilized in conjunction with the construction drawings to ke e p track of the York completed adjacent to each property. DISCUSSION The proposed Agreement i s the standard agreement developed by Arapahoe County to cover work requests from other governmental entities . Discussions with personnel at Arapahoe County indicate it would be several years before they wou ld consider chang- ing computer systems again, so thls software should be useful for at least five years (Arapahoe r.ounty could not be any more definitive than this). The property ownership lists are requested twice for each Paving District because of the l e ngth of time between formation of the District and notification of assessments . According to the County, they are able to start wor k immediately on writing the new software . Cost of the new software is $1,372 .00 . Funds are available in the Public Improve- A.aent Fund monie, for P~ving District No . 33 . This cost will be a City c~st and will 'W:!!2! be assessed to property owners in Paving District No. 33 nor any future paving districts . "!COlllll'~ It LB recommended that th• propo11d Software Development Agreement with Arapahoe Cou.nty for computer Hrvicu be approved . Funds are available in tho Pav ing Dis • trict No . 33 account of tho PIF .