HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-04-21 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet•
•
•
AG ENDA FOR THE RE GU LAR MEETING O F THE EN GLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL Mo nday, April 21, 2008 7:3 0 p.m. Engle\\ood Ci,lc Center -CouncU Ch,,mbers 1000 Englewood Park\, ay Engle\\ood, CO 80110
1. Call to order
2. Im ocabon.
3. Pledge of Allegiance.
4. Roll Call.
5. Conside rat 10n of Minutes of Previous Session .
a. Minutes from the Regula r City Counci l meeting of April 7, 2008.
6. Recognition of Sched uled P•s~lic Commen t. (Ple,1se li mit you r presentation to ten mi nutes.)
7. Recogni110n of Unscheduled Public Comment. (Please limit your presentation to fl,e minules.
Time fo r unscheduled public commen t may be limi ted 10 45 minutes and If li mited shall be
continued to General Discussion.)
8. Communlcauons, Proclamations, and Appoin tm ents.
a. E-nuil rrom Ken Bronson r,nouncing his rMl~nation from Keep Englewood Beau hful.
9. Consen t Agenda Items.
Appro, al oi Ordinances on Flrst Reading.
Council Bill No . 15 -Recommenda tion from the Public Wo rks Department to
adopt • B,11 for an Ordinance approving a 2008 agreement with the Englewood
Lion\ dub for maintenance of the Englewood Loons Club minia ture train, which
u1J~rates at Belleview Park du ring the su mmer mon ths. STA FF SO URCE: Rick
Kahm, Director, and Pa t Wh ite, Fl eet Manager.
Ple.ut' note: If )'OU ht1\ t' d ~u~.,bihty and 1 1eed au'1h,1ry ,uds or ser\ ices. plr.1se llOlln• 1hr Cily or (ngk·\\'OOd
IJ0)-76! 24071 ,11 lr,,,:1 48 hou rs In ,,clvance ,r whrn '"" ice, ,trl' needen . TI1,1n, you.
£n,Rl1•\,ood C1 1, Cot11u ti \~t•11cl.1 A1>11I 21 . !008 r.,ge 2 11. Council Bill No. I b -Recommendauon rrom the Public \ Vorks Department 10 Jdopt a Bill 1or an Ordinance appro, mg an lntergm ernmental Agreement ior the C11) ol Engle-., ood to prO\ tde the Cit) oi Cherry Hills Village "11h , elude mamtenance sen tees for 1008. STAFF SOURCE: Rick Kahm, Din-ct or, and Pal Whitt, Fleet Man ager.
b. ApprO\ al ol Ordinances on Second Reading.
Council Bill No. 20, app;O\ ing an lntergO\ ernmental Agreement \\Ith the Den-er
Regional Council of Governments allo\\ ing reimbursemen t of signal system
equipmen t purchases to the City of Engle\\ood in the amount of S24,000 for th~
2007 Fisca l Year Miscellaneous Equipment Purchase program.
c. Resolutions and Motions.
Reco mmen dation from th e Public Works Departm ent to approve, by Motion, an
extension of the Int ergovernm e ntal Agreement fo r the City of Englewood 10
pro,•lde the Chy of Sheridan wit h vehicle mainte nance se rvice s for 2008. STAFF
SOURCE: Rick Ka hm, Director, and Pa t White, Fl eet Manager.
10. Pu blic Hearing llems !No ne sc heduled.)
11. Ordina nces, Resolutions and Mollons.
a. Approva l of Ordinances on First Read ing.
Council Bill No. 23 -Reco111menda1ion from the Community De, elopment
Department to adopt a Bill for an Ordinance authorizing the Den, er Seminary
Planned Unit Oe-.,elopment IPUDJ Amendmen t No. 2 she plan adjustments. S1.n
also recommends a Public Hearing be set for May 19, 2008, to constder public
testlmon1• on t,mendment ~-STAFF SOUR CT: Alan White, Dirtct or.
b. Approval oi Ordin,mces on Second Reading.
c. Resolutions Jnd Mrtions.
Recomntenda tlon from the Human Resources Department to apprO\ e a
Resolution appointing 1hose Hearing Officers on the list approved In ~007 to he.u
Mertt ,ind Discipllt1Jry ,1ppeals. STAFF SO URCE: Sue Ea ton, Di recto r of Human
Resources.
11, Recommendation from the Hum an Re sou rces Department to approve, by Mo11o n,
th e ,1ppointrnent of a hea ring o ffi ce r fo r a discipli nary appe.il flie d by Rltha rd
Burton, STAFF SOURCE : Sue Eaton, Director of Human Reso urces.
1'1rdsl' now: If )OU h,lH1 ,1 dl~.1!11fltv ,u HI nerd ,1uxdl~uy .uds or service(;, lll<',,,P 11011fy 1hr Cny of rngl£1\\00(I
1301•'762-J-107) ,It 14",1'-I 48 t,our4i 1n ,Ul\11111cr of wl1en services .ur nreclnl. TI1,111~ yo u,
•
•
•
[n~ie-,ood Ctl\ CtJUn<• ~(e•wl., ,'\1ml ! I !008 l',lge J •
•
•
ni. Rl.'commendation lrom the Puhhc \Vor~s Department to appro, e, by Motion, the purchase 0 1 a Cate~J1l13r 4:0E Backhoe. Staf1 recommends purchasing the eq uipment through the Color,ido Department ofTransportation con tract with Wagner Equipment Company In the to tal amount oi Sil. In STAFF SOUR CT: Rick Kahm, Director, and Pal White, Fleet Manage r.
iv. Recommendation frnm ,he Littleton/Englewood Waste Water Treatment Plant
Supen isori Committee to approve, by Motion, the purchase of one, low ground
pressure, rubber tr,1cked, arm tractor from John Deere, Inc. (Model 8330T) In the
amount of S 1 JB,959.61. The cost of this expenditure will be shared 50/50 by the
Cities of Englewood and litrleton and has been approved in the budget. STAFF
SOUR CE: Stewart H. Fonda, Di rector of Utilltles, and Jim Tallent, Opera tions
Division Manager.
"· Recommen~a tion from th e Utlllties Depanment to approve, by Mo ti on, a bid for
the installatlo~ of a transformer, switch and other Improvements for the Allen Filter
Plant Staff rec,mmends awarding the bid to the lowest acceptable bidder, Glaser
Electric Compa>1y, In the am ount of S 106,11 5. STAFF SOU RCE: Stewart H.
Fonda, Directo r of Utilities.
12. General Discuss ion .
a. Mayor's Choice.
b. Council Members' Choice.
13. City Manager's Report
14. City Attorney's Report
15. Adjournment
l~e.i<e 1101(•: If 1ou lta1 e ,, dls,1bilr 1y ,111d rll'cd ,,u,lli,tl)' .lids or servlu•s please nollfy 1he City of [11glewood
IJQJ.;62-24071 J I le,lSt 46 hou" In ,1dv,1nce of 1>hen seMces ,ire needed Th.mk ,_ou ____ ~
•
•
•
ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL ENGLEWOOD, ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO Regular Session Aprll 7, 2008
Call to Order
The regular meeting of the Englewood C,ty Councd was caffed to order by Mayor Woodward al 7 45 pm
2 Invocation
The lnvoc;allon was given by Council Member McCaslln.
3. Pledge of Alleg ian ce
The Pledge or Allegiance was Jed by Council Member Mccaslin.
4, Roll Call
Present
Absent
A quorum was pres!!nl
Also presenL
Council Members Jefferson, Penn, Oakley, McCaslln, Wilson, Woodward
Council Member Moore
City Manager Sears
City Attorney Brotzman
Oeputy City Manager Flaherty
CltyCletllEl!is
Oeputy City Cl9r1l Bush
Director Black, Parks and Recreation
Director Gryglewlcz, Finance and Admin,slrabve Services
Director Konishi, Information Technology
Director White, Communtty Development
Police Commander Wa tson
Golf Operations Manager Spada, Parks and Recreation
Traffic Engineer Vostry, Publ ic WO<ks
Housing Finance Specialist Grimmett, Community Development
5, Consideration of Minutes of Previous Sosalon
(a) COUNC IL MEMBER WILSON MOVED, AND COUNCIL MEMBER McCASLIN SECONDED,
TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULA.R CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 17, 2008.
Mayor Woudward asked d there were any changes or correcbons There were none
Vote results:
Motion carried
Ayes:
Nays·
Absent:
Council Memhers Penn, Mccaslin, Woodward, Jefferson. Wilson, Oakley
None
Council Member Moore
6. Recognition o f Scheduled Public Comment
(a) LIia Downing said I am co-chair of the 2008 Midwest Plains Regional Babe Ruth U14 and U16
G,rrs Softball Tournament I am also the Director of SoRball lor Englewood Youth Sports, a District
Eng lowood City Council April 7, 2008 Pago 2 Comm,.s1oner for Babe Ruth Softball and a volunteer soflball coach at Engl,1wood High School W1lh me ton,ght Is my husband Tom Downing wh o 1s a o,slnct Comm1s,1oner for Bab•? Ruth, Judy Blanscel Is my co-chaor for 1he tournament. Teresa Harper 1s a softball coach at Englewood High School and also a so~ball coach for Englewood Youth Spot1s, A' "a Downing 1s our housing coord1nato, lo, th-? tournament and a sofltaD coach for our summer program and a :mer sottbatt player; Reg,na Downmg. my ycungest and a softball player '11/hy are we here? July 17"' thrc:-.igh 20"'. Englewood Youth Spot1s will be hosltng lhe 2008 Reg10nal Babe Ruth Tournamenl here In our greal C1ly of Englewood We will have 16 leams from the Midwest Region partic,palmg
1n the tournament, which will consist of a round-robm formal leading In to a double ehminat1on 1ournamen1 We
are anticipating upwards of 800 to 1,000 people m Englewood over the course of the weekend On the local
level Englewood, Castle Rock, Parker, Strasburg. l.Jlllelon, Arapahoe we aro all inter-league and we play It
os a fo,mat where everybody plays, everybody on the roster bats 11 os recreallOnal Al the end of our local
league play, we draw All Star teams The All Star teams then move on lo the State compet1110n Teams
partoc1pate 1n the Stale compeltlton, the winners from Stale move into the Regional ro und, Regional tc.urnament
winners move on to Invitational tournaments or, 1n our case, our 16 and under champion will move on to the
Wo~d Senes We made this chart up really Just 10 sho•· , JU the big seheme of things ... the Regional
Tournaments that are going to be held and how the different Regions are broken up and that Englewood ,son
the map These were off the Babe Ruth website Everyone gets to see th,s and MlOW that we are hOSbng the
tow nament Our responslbilitles for this tournament include our Opening Ceremony This Is to be held at
Spencer Field It Is an Ideal and beautiful 10cat10n. There 1s plenty of parking and room for the festivities
Teams are checked In, fed, coaches meeting held, Opening Ceremony with Introductions followed by a double-
header game. Next Is housing the visiUng players. We will be housing approximately 200 softball players that
weekend This means that each of our 'lislting players will be staying with a local family for the duration of their
tournament experience This Is a unique component of Babe Ruth There are no less than two
girls somebmes you could have 6 or 10 kids depending on how much room you have and how good a cooll
you might be. You bring them into your house for the duration of that tournament, they become part of your
famtly , II is an outstanding expenence We have done all pieces of it...myself, our fam1ly ... we have hos ted
players We have had our girls hosted and we have been coaches where our team was the one being hosted
And on all levels of It, ,t just make s the whole softball experience one notch beller We wtU also be providing the
fields and umpires. working in conjuncbon with Englewood Parks and Rec The followmg fields will be irubzed
for the tournament Denny M~ler. BeUevfew Park, Spencer Fleld and Centennial #2 CIOs,ng Ceremonies at
the complebon of the tournament winners are presented with a banner, plaque and individual medals The
winner of the 14 year old d1v1slon will conltnue on to the National lnvitat,onal Tournament and the win ne r of the
16 year olds will continue to lhe World Series which Is going to be held In Massachusetts. Why are we doing
this? I get asked that a lot and bottom lone ls to build our softball program and in order for our coaches to see
the level of sknl needed to compete at a h,gher level bong the tournament here and let them see 1t in the~ own
backyard, In the comfort of their own home, they get to see what 111s bke next 1,me they step on that field they
know where they have to reach with that team What does 11 cost...approxomately $6,000 00 This includes the
hosting fee, umpires , fields, concessions and awards Unltke other tournaments, Babe Ruth docs nol charge
individual learns 10 part1clpale In a lournament...just the host. While some feel that, tha t Isn't fatr to put the
bu rden on the hosting orgamzat1on , 1t has proven to be a way to not exclude a team from partoc1p~tlng due to
cost How will we raise the money? That 1s a great q~estoo By asking our local busmesses and townspeople
for donations tn return, we wlll promote them and/or their place of business It may be an advertisement on our
tournament program or a banner hung on the field of lhetr choice We woll only be serving pre-pa,ckaged snacks
and dnnks. thereby sending our v1s1tors to our local establtshments for food and drink L ast but not least, how
can you help? Well, we need volunteers II 1s go ing to tak e a lot of volunteers 10 make t his happen We will be
staffing four fields completely We need host families and, of course. we need money On behalf or myself.
Englewood Youth Sports and Babe Ruth Softball. thank you for your time and consideration In regards to this
outstanding event that will have the C,ty of Englewood s,ngong Take Me Out to the Ball Park
Mayor Woodward said thank you. good )Ob
Ms Dowmng said thank you Are there any questtons?
Mayor Woodward said typically we address any questoons presented du11ng Scheduled o, Unscheduled Public
Comment al the end of the meebng under Council Members Cho,ce So I am sure n wtll be addressed at that
ltme Ms Downing sa,d thank you very much
•
•
•
•
•
•
Englewood City Council Apr il 7, 2008 Pag e 3 7 Rcc~gnition or Unscheduled Public Comment (a ) Mela nie Brooks -Ne lson , an Englewood resident. sa,d I was go ing to start out by saying that I am here 10 express concern about the Kent Place development. but that ,snot accurate . I am not concerned . I'm despairing . I'm angry , I'm heartbroken al Ihe prospect or the proposed towe rs of this developme o' plunging my
home and property, along wilh others. on Floyd Place and Floyd Avenue ,nlo the gloom of the ir a,eadful shadow
in the darkest. coldest months or winter When I saw lhe tower In the first plan . by the original developers
several years ago , I sa id unconcernedly lo my husband , Englewood w,11 never lel !hat happen to us . I liked lhe
rest or what I saw so I didn't feel the need to conli nue part,cipaling in the Input process . My lack or inpul unlil
recent ly then portrays , not my apalhy , bul my supreme na ivety in be lieving that our re presentatives , who asked
for our voles and took on th is sacred mantle of elected oflice . would guard our interest ,n this matter . I feel
be trayed and hurt I am fully aware that this Council has to grapp le with many issues, among them serious
budge tary issue s, and lhat this development Is badly needed to he lp our tax base ... I know that and I support it
for that reason , in the general sense . Even !houg h it means many months of no,se , dirt , congest ion.
construction and a resulting high dens ity development. ,twill forever affecl lhe quality ol life and cha racler of our
beloved ne ighborhood . Is n't that enough or a burden to ask us to bear for the greater good of Englewood? How
could you say that we must also bear th e scourge or a high-rise shadow when you should have been balancing
the n~eds or Engl ewood on one hand with th e needs of our neighborhood on the other ... how ii would impacl the
jewel among Englewood's ne ig hborhoods . You inslead allowed the forme r lo completely oulweigh the latter ,
acqu iescen l lo the very worst aspect of the plan ... lhe lower on the north side of the property . If there were lo be
lowers, they should have been made to be localed on the south side . Whatever shadows the plan cre ates
should be borne by lhe development In ils concern for grealer Englewood and I undersland this concern ... I
really do . Th is Council allowed its perspective lo become overly skewed and narrowed to be lieve lhal somehow
Eng lewood 's future econ omic viability rests on a 179 fool lower on lhe north edge of lhe Kent Pl ace
Development Th is loss of perspective threatens lo spell disasle r for the southern half of Ha mpden Hills . So,
the rest of my comments were addressed lo the developers and arch itects , but I don't th ink they are he re. I wil l
just briefly go over whal I was going to say lo them , because I know ii is a done deal what you have done ... what
you have approved so far My message to them was , when I spoke before the Plann in g and Zon ing
Commiss ion about this matter, I tried lo convey how much my lo ve of my home is tied up with the glorious
sunshine pour in g in from our new ly enlarged south facing windows . our new sou th facing Frenc h doors and our
sou th skylights Particularly in the mids t of winier when the sun Is lowest in the sky , lhe lighl floods our liv ing
room and ma in bedrooms My ch il dren played year-roun d in our southern oriented back ya rd when they were
growing up , which we Jokingly called the banana belt, beca use it always had the warmth and ligh t cre ated by the
sou thern sun in the w,nter Now lhal my children are grown , and as we an ticipate, ho pef,illy , grandch il dren , we
have looked fooward to see ing another generation reveling in the gifts of the beautiful Co lorado winie r sun In our
southern yard Now the developers are proposing I~ lake th is away from us . We have never done them any
harm Our neig hborhOod Is not some colleclmn of monopo ly like plastic houses , vie'.'.'ed al some dispassionate
dis tance of the site plan We are real peop le who love ou r neighborhood , who ~heri~h nd ca re for our
homes . some or us for decades . So , my message to the developers is th is: if you persist ,n !his plan for towers
in the north side of the development of lhe property, I plan to write letters to all 1he ma· De nwe r media te lling
them what is happen ing and how much they are opposed m this II will no longer :ie /U sl an Englewood issue It
will become a rest:, ,led neighbor with a de spise d development On the othe r hand , If fhP Ill a fit of enlightened
sell interest . recognize the wisdom of redu cing the lowers or placing them m the south side , I will li kewise
bombard the med ia wit h praise for a wise change of course In light of new Input Thei r name wi ll be associated
with good feel ings and en li ghtened dec ision-making and cooperative rela tio ns with the ir ne ighbors to the nortl ,.
Each of these is a promise depending on th e dec ision that the developers make . Tha nk you .
Mayor Woodward said thank you
(b ) Kath )' Sla lle r, an Englewood resident, said I am here tonight as a follow up to the many
hearings you have hod on the Kent Place Deve lopment ov er the years . In part , I would like to commend you for
the early design . but . at th e same t,m e, express my disappoin tmen t. d1scouragell'en I an d concern about ds
evolut,on I l h1nk whe n lh 1s was originally thought up or created by then developer Fnrstmann , !here was a grea l
deal of concern neighborhood-wide not 1ust Englewood , but all surrou nding commu11Ihes As was men tio ned
ea rl ier . ,t ,snot even Just the home s that are direc lly adIacen l, bul 11 ,s a co mmu n,ty im ag e for Englewood as you
Englewood City Council April 7, 2008 Pago4 are dnv,ng down Hampden, down University •.. comlng or 90mg Whether ,t 1s coming for the baseball or the softball that was just described It 1s a very prominent location and the concept, If well executed, could t,e a very prominent urban design, resldenual design statement However, as all the great effort has gone into th,s the community ,nvolvemenl the artent,on to the details of arch1tecrure and the open space , how the adjacent neighbofs are impacted or preserved, ltow transp011at,on Is worked, how the drainage JS worked, how the shadowsgo •.. a great deal of work went into making this the best H could be I feet Mke all those great thoughts, 1f you think of them as hke colon; on a canvas, instead of being painted orderly now, with the new concept of
creating or establishing just building envelopes, with a httte bit of carte blanche of where a building can go, how
close a set back can be done, what height goes where ... there were great reasons for It. I mean, who knows
what will happen wil h the market. None the less, the result seems to be more of a splattering o: th e paint
thro\1111 at the canvas, rather than an orderly, comrr.unlty design . One thing mentioned by the previous speaker,
emotionally so, I mean this Is a Ille style home lost to an lnd,vldual, but I think it Is a loss to more than just that
one Individual. I think It Is going to be an image recognized and acknowledged by many communities around
there I am not technicaay in Englewood •.. my maif,ng address ls ... I am technically next door. The shadows will
Mus as well. They will preclude solar designs and this huge, new emphasJS now being put on green
developmen~ which win be seen by greater community planning efforts ••• that 1s going to be obliterated to a
great extenl The vegetations, the outdOOf loving areas, a lot ol these things will not be viable given the potenllal
locations of buildings ... not knowing exactly where they go, You will have a great deal of retail, which could be
wonderful. You have nice hlgh-end ... polenUally hlgh~nd ... resldenUal. Many potential ly great things. My
concem and the concern of many beyond me, Is that there are not enough gu idelines. not enough commitments
In place that will help you know that you can guide this Into a desirable, respected community or gateway entry
Into Englewood. There are a lot of loose ends In a PUO that you don't know exactly what the setback will end
up bein9> The next developer would likely come on ... there has been Forstmann, then Continuum, great
developers, especiany Continuum ... but as tt passes through with a lot of open ended optlons, a lot ol things
could fall through the Cllleks. And I would llke to see some consideration given to lightening that. to really
knowing what can come of this and some of lhe potenbal resuhs of this open ended swing Those are my
comments. Thank you
Mayor Woodward said thank you
(c) Ken Cobb, an Englewood resident, said I too have concerns with the Kent Place
Oeveloprnent...a planned urban developmen~ but what it has regressed to Is a preliminary plan. They don't
have the footprints. The latest amendment Is asking that they approve envelopes In which the buildings can be
moved around to meet whatever they like to at a later date. They don't know the height of the buildings. The
towers can be over 120 feet tall, I think. They don't even know the occupancy. With this amendmenl they ask
that the commercial space be Increased and said that this would be offset by less resldenllal space But the
reduction in the resJdenbal space Isn't accomplished by a reduction In lhe number of resldentJal units, It is
accomplished by counting hotels as a hatt umlt and I think that Is Just a slight of hand, really I looked throughout
the Development Code 10 find where that W3S an acceptable practice and found nothing t hat had any lndlcallon
that hotels are counted as half uni ts ... only that parking for a hotel unit is one where a single family dwelling Is
two. Maybe they extrapolated that, I don 't know, but it doesn't seem right. They also haven't answered whether
those hotel units could la ter be changed back to residential units. Ir the economy became more favorable for that
type of dwelling. But I really believe the thrust of this amendment is to take the p<0ject out of the public forum
They have asked that any changes to their !}Ian .. this preliminary plan .. goes to Planning and Zoning and the
residents of the neighborhood won't have a say into that al all And, so far, I found that Planning and Zoning Is
akin to the little gir1 who can't say no For ,nstance. in the original PUD they had a buffer zone ahong the north
slde of the property that were going to be townhouses When the first amendment came around, they changed
that to pu1 a tower that Is going to be as tall as, I'm not sure, 140 feet or something like that on the north side of
the property and shading more of the neighborhood Floyd and Floyd Place partlcula~y ... and Planning and
Zoning supported that change Removing the PUD process from the public forum , In my opinion, simply gives
•
•
the developer carte blanche on doing what they want to do. We have had so lillle ... you know. for neighborhood •
citizens. we can't study these proposa ls very thoroughly We don't have the knowledge. We don't have the
tome We have other jobs and we have families to raise and I think that these PUO's these developers slowly
wear us down to the point that they get what they want And, II ls only you commissioners thal have our best
interest 0( can have our best mterest and protect our interests I think tak,ng it out of the publlc forum IS a
ternble precedence One of lhe hattmasks of democracy Is that every ClbZen has his say, has h!S day. ha. a
•
•
Engl•wood City Council April 7, 2008 Pago 5 Chance 10 make a difference to their commun,ty And I lhlnk lh1s amendmenl Ines to strop our voa from this process and I think 1t ,s undemocra11c I request that you vole no on lh1s proposal and that they bring forward a plan lhal 1s a real plan, not a preliminary plan, and ,f they make amendmen1s 10 that. lhen they go lhrough lhe process aga in Thal Is whal ,s 1n lhe Developmenl Code and lhal 1s wha1 1hey should proceed lo do lhank you Mayor Woodward said lhank you
Mayor Woodward said I jusl want 10 menllOn to everybodr who spoke regard ing Ken1 Place, lhat lh1s Council
has not seen the documents or the amendments that are proposed II has been through the Planning and
Zoning Commission, and we haven't received It yet He asked Alan While, do you have a date as to the Public
Heanng and when rt will be coming forward?
Community Development Director Whrte saod the first r 1ac:hng IS in two weeks The Pubfic Heanng, I believe, IS
30 days after that, then the second reading subsequent to that II may be occumng in May . I beheve. but d they
would call our office. we will be sure to gel them the correct dates.
Mayor Woodward said okay, or they can check the websae, but there w,11 definitely be a Public Hearing on that
with Council and I would certainly encourage you lo speak at that also. Thank you.
Ms, Mary Sares said are those Public Hearings posted, by sign? Mayor Woodward said yes She said okay.
(d) Kim Love. an Englewood businessman, said I address you again tonight as President of
Englewood Unleashed I would like to remind everybody ... our good guests here tonight and the City
Council that this comrng Saturday, Apr,I 12". Is our biggest annual fund raiser .it ,sour t' It Is our Chili Cook
Off which runs between 11 am. and 2 pm at the Malley Senio4' Center which is very close , obv,ously, hefe to
Crty Hal We expect a record ctowd this year because there as been a lot of promot10n As you know, we put a
banner over Broadway and we have talked to a lot of businesses in the area, so we have a lot of excttement. on
top of hand1119 out thousands of flyers at the off-leash parlks, particularly the Canine Corral. We have record
numbe,s of entries this year We have at least 30 entnes , where last y~ar we had 20 some We have vanous
categories Including red, green and vegetarian recipes anod some of you honorary members are golng 10 be
judges 1nctud1ng the Mayor and City Council members We hope you will be able to coat your tongue,
because some, we understand , w,11 be pretty hot... some will be mild too. So, we are going to enioy our record
crowd this year We are anticipating between 500 and 700 people, which is probably twofold over what we had
l ast year. We have talked to many local merchan ts and vendors aboul having tables at our event anrl right now
we still have a few tables so , if any of you know any other merchants or vendors In Englewood or close by that
would like to have a tabt.i giving exposure to the public, we still have a few, so we appreciate your help on lhat.
This year we are having the Humane Society bring their adoption van and will be out in the parking lot of the
Matley Senior Center and hoping to adopl a dozen or so clogs Lasl year 1t was a tremendous success. In facl,
you may know Bev Bradshaw a prevoous Mayor of Englewood ... adopted a dog last year, as well It happens
to be a Saini Bernard or Saint Bernard m,x so 11 was a very cute bttle puppy The important thing IS that al of
these dogs were basically homeless and were in a shelter and now they have loving hOme5 It IS one ol the big
benefits ii we can place some of these clogs 1n some loving homes. A lot of the people have exotement after
they leave or when they come out on the pa/lung lol they wilt see all the clogs that are very anX10Us to see
people We hope that everyone wdl come ,f nothing else, come to taste the chill We wil have vendors and
there wlll be a lot of excitement this year For those of you who are helping Judge, we hope you wdt come. at
least, around 1 O a m And again, the evenl opens to the public around 11 a m to 2 p m Thank you very much
and I appreciate lhe time to talk to you
Mayor Woodward said thank you Kim e a Communications, Proclamations and Appoint me nts
(a) A proclamat10r1 declaring Ap11I 18, 2008 as Arbor Day was considered
Englewood City Council April 7, 2008 Page 6 Mayor Woodward said I would hke to read Iust a couple of lhings from the Proclamatoon and that Is "Whereas, this holiday called Arbor Day, was hrst observed w1lh the planhng of more that a m,11,on trees In Nebraska. and Whereas, Arbor Day ,snow observed throughout lhe Untied States and the world , and Whereas. the City or Englewood, Colorado has been recognized for 23 consecutive years as a Tree City USA by the Nat,onal Arbor Day Foundation and desires to contonue IIs iree pla nt,ng ways, and Whereas, the Sta te ol Colorado w,11 celebrate Arbor Day on Apnl 18, 2008 •
Mayor Woodward said our Director ol Parks and Recreahon Jerrell Black Is here lo accept this Proctamat,on
COUNCIL MEMBER WILSON MOVED, AND COUNCIL MEMBER PENN SECONDED, TO APPROVE A
PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 18, 2008 AS ARBOR DAY.
Mayor WoodWard asked 1f there was any dIscuss10n There was none
Voto results :
Molion carried
Ayes
Nays
Absent
Councd Members Penn. McCashn, Woodward, Jelferson, Wilson. Oakley
None
Council Member Moore
Moyer Woodward presented the proclamation to Director Black
(b) A proclamallon declaring Apnl 2008 as Housing Amenca Month was considered
•
Mayor Woodward said I would hke to read a few things regarding that from the Proclamation "Under the U.S •
Hous,ng Act to promote the general welfare of the nabon by employing ,ts funds and credit to assist the several
slates and lhe~ pohtical subdivis,ons to remedy the unsafe and unsamtary hous,ng cond,t,ons and the acute
shortage of decenL safe and sanitary dwellings for lower ,ncome famihes; and Whereas, llQ:Ording to the "State
of the Nation's HouSlllg Report· 15 6 mllhon households now pay more than hatt of the11 income for housing, and
on any given n,ghL there are nearly 750,000 homeless nat1011wtde and up to 3 5 m~l10n persons who experience
homelessness at some pomt throughout lhe year, and Whereas, accordrng to the National Low-Income HOUSlfl9
Coallt10n's Out of Reach Report", minimum wage earners are unable to alford even a one-bedroom home
anywhere ,n the country, and 88% of n ·nters In cIbes live m areas where the fair market rent lor a two-bedroom
rcnlal Is not affordable even wllh two, ,nlmum wage )obs, and Whereas, the aforementioned groups have
declared April, Housing America Mont ,, nart of a year-long, nat,Jnal campaign 10 Inform the public and decision
makers of the crlt,cal need to address ti nat1011's housing ar1d cummundy development cor1ccrns, •
COUNCIL MEMBER WILSON MOVED, AND COUNCIL MEMBEFl McCASLIN SECONDED , TO APPROVE A
PROCLA MATIO N DECLARING APRIL 2008 AS HOUSING AMERICA MONTH.
Mayor Wood.vard asked 1f there was any d1scuss10n There was none
• ote results:
Mot,on camed
Ayes
Nays
Absent
Council Members Penn McCaslin. Woodwa<d Jefferson Wilson . Oakley
None
Council Member Moore
Mayor Woodward satd Janet Gnmmett from the C.:immumly Ocvelopmenl Department Is hero to accept the
Proclamat,on He sa,d congratulallo,1s
Ms G11mmet1 said tllank you
9 Consent Agenda •
•
•
•
C:nglcwood City :::ouncil April 7, 2008 Page 7 COUNCIL MEMBER OAKLEY MOVED , AND COUNCIL MEMBER McCASLIN SECONDED, TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 9 (a) (I), 9 (b) (I), (Ii) and 9 (c) (I). (a) Approva l of Ordinances on First Read ing (1) COUNC IL BILL NO 20. INTROOUCEO BY COUNC IL MEMBER OAKLEY
A Bill FOR AN OROIN/,NCE APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (IGA) ENTITLED
'CONTRACT BY ANO BETWEEN THE DENVER REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (ORCOG)" FOR
REIMBURSEMENT TO THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO FOR MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC
SIGNAL EQUIPMENT
(b) Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading
(1) ORDINANCE NO 17, SERIES OF 2008 (COUNCIL BILL NO 1 8, INTRODUCED BY
COUNCIL MEMBER MOORE)
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNM ENTAL AGREEMENT (IGA) ENTITLED "LICENS ING
AGREEMENT REGARDING DENVER REGIONAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROJECT" BETWEEN THE
DENVER REG IONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ANO THE CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO FOR
THE CITY'S PARTIC IPATION IN TH E DENVER REGIONAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROJECT (ORAPP)
(II) ORDINANCE NO 18, SERIES OF 2008 (COUNCIL BILL NO 19, INTRODUCED BY
COUNCIL MEMBER MOORE:)
AN OROINANCE APPROVl',G AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (IGA) ENTITLED "LICENSE
AGREEMENT" BETWEEN THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ANO EMPLOYMENT AND THE CITY
OF ENGLEWOOD, COLO RADO IN SUPPORT OF THE CITY'S USE OF SlATE WAGE ANO EMPLOYMENT
DATA
(c) Resolullons and MolJOlls
(1) "contract 11111h Integrated Electric, Inc . for the construellon of lhe Broadway and Tuhs
lra ffic signal, In the .,,.,, ' of $46, 156 69.00
Vote results:
Molloncamed
Ayes·
Nays
Absent
10 Public Hearing Items
Council Members Penn, McCasl,n , Woodward . Jefferson. Wilson. Oakley
None
Council Member Moore
No public hearing was scheduled before Council.
11 Ordinances, Resolution and Motions
(a) Approval ol Ordinances on Firs! Reading
(I) Golf Operations Manager Spada presenled a recommendat10n from the Parks and
Rec,-eatlon Departmenl 10 adopl a bill for an ordina nce approving an agreemenl w,lh McGetr;ck Golf Academy
10 operale lhe Broken Tee Englewood Indoo r Training Cenler
COUNCIL MEMBER PENN MOVED, AND COUNCIL MEMBER McCASLIN SECONDED, TO APPROVE
AGENDA ITEM 11 (a) (i) • COUNCIL BILL NO. 21 .
Engle wood City Council April 7, 20 0 8 Page 8 COUNCIL BILL NO . 21 , INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER PENN A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BcTWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD ANLJ McGETRICK GOLF ACADEMY FOR A TRAINING CENl ER AT BROKEN TEE ENGLEWOOD . Mayor Woodward asked if there was any discussion
Mayor Woodward sai~ I wou,d ju st like to say thal I lhink you have obta ined a real profess ional gro up or trainers
that will make lhe City , and Broken Tee Englewood , very proud ... some of us will tru ly need them
Counci l Member Penn said Bob , I really encourage you to try gelling Eng lewood kids over the re ... Englewood
citizens . I th ink thal would be very important and hopeful ly you will work towards that. I know I talked to Jerrell
about good lhings lhal 11re happening , so please do lhat.
Mr. Spada said we will, we will do our best Randy ,
Mayor Woodward asked if there was anylhing else . There was nothing more .
Vote res ult s:
Ayes :
Nays :
Absent :
Motion carried .
Mr . Spada said thank you .
Counc il Members Penn . Mccaslin , Woodwa rd, Jefferson , Wilson , Oakley
None
Counci l Member Moore
(b) Approva l of Ord in a,1ces on Seccnd Reild ing
There were no ad<lilional ilems submitted for app roval on second reading . (Ste Agenda Item 9 -Consent
Agenda .)
(c) Resolulions and Motions
(i) Director Gryglewir.z presenled a recommendation from lhe Finance and Adm lnlstralive
Services Departmen t to approve a resolu tion supporting disposilion of funds received from the Regional
Transportation District 's purchase of land from the Englewood Mclellan Reservo ir Foundalion . He said lhls is a
resolulion supporting the sale of approx imately 1 0 acres of land to the Regional Transportation Dislrict for a light
rail slation, to be buill some tim e around 2016. II was sold by lhe Englewood Mclellan Reservo ir Foundalion .
Th is wil l probably be lhe only sale of lhe property under the control of the Foundation . Th is was a sale under
threal of condemnalion . The gros s proceeds of the sale was :J.2 million . We had S182 .50 closing costs, which
netted the Foundalion $3,199,817 .50. The disposillon of the proceeds are flrsl to repay the Waler Fund 's cash
advance of $100,000.00, payment In full for lhe su;plus land tha l lhe Wale· Fund had and lhat was $280 ,675.00
for a total lo lhe Water Fund of $380,675.00 . The General Fund is be ing ro ,paid $150 ,000.00. The Eng lewood
Mclellan Reservoir Found ation w,11 retain $2.170,000.00 for future develo~ ,nenl of the property and the
remainder of $499,142.50 will be transferred to lhe Gene ral Fund Long Te r11 Asset Reserve .
COUN CIL MEMBER OAKLEY MOV ED, ANO COUNC IL MEMB ER WILSON SEC OND ED, TO APPROV E
AGENDA ITEM 11 j c) (I )· RESOL UTION 11!0 . 34, SERIE S OF 2008.
RESOLUTION NO . 34, SERIES OF 2008
•
•
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE SALE AND DISPOSITION OF THE PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF A •
PORTION OF THE ENGLEWOOD McLELLAN RESERVOIR FOUNDATION (EMRF) PROPERTY TO THE
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTR ICT (RTD).
Mayor Wo odward asked ,r there was any d1scuss ior, or questions
•
•
•
Englewood City Council April 7, 2008 ?ag~ 9 Council MembN Jefferson said Is this land prep stuff hsled on here Is !hat dirt moving lhe expenses lisled under the EMRF area for land preparallon? Director Gryglewlcz said 1I Is mainly moving dirt, filling and gelling the land ready for development We are Just doing ground leases We are not domg any building Just basically cuts and fills and anyone Who ha~ dealt w,th this, it Is very expensive but we think the property wilt becorne much mo re marketable and valuable and produce a long term revenue stream for the City.
Mayor Woodward asked 1f there were any other questions
Mayor Woodward said Frank. I do have one And that tS , under the Water Fund, it says payment in lul for lhe
land Does this transfer represent the total cost o·f all of the Mclellan land lo the Water Board?
Mr. Gryglewicz said this 1s the htstoncal price of the land that was not needed for the Reservoir and tt will be
transferred to tho Water Fund for their use. Mr Woodward said okay, so under future leases, .. I mean, this
basically would repay the Water Board for that land Mr Gryglewicz said yes Mr WOOdward said okay, thank
you
Mayor Woodward asked if there were any other questions or comments
Council Member Penn said I just have one question If we hadn't sold this land, where would we have gotten
this money for land preparation? Was that already discussed and was that already budgeted?
Mr. Gryglewicz said we die not ever budget that The funds were not available until this property was sold for
the future light rail station. We would have had to find the money somewhere, but obVtOUsty It Is e substantial
amount of funds that aren't readily available, but this land sale happened to come up and It funde•i the land
preparation.
Councd Member WIison said Is that the grading that they are always talking about?
Mr. Gryglewicz said there will not only be grading. but there is 50ml' infrastructure that has to be done Also,
just moving the dirt alone can be incredibly expensive You know when you are talking about moving dirt at
about $10 a cubic yard , It can get very, very expensive to do au this work
Council Member Wilson sa,d and what would the infrastructure be? Mr. Gryglewicz said you might have to bri ng
In a sewer line or something like that under the property to make ij bulldable so all of those sorts ol UCllons that
would have to be done to get ready for someone to come In and actually put a build ing there .
Mayor Woodward said I think we also had some storm water work that needed to be done to divert storm water
and possibly some shonng .. that type of thing 1hat Is Included In the land preparation.
M, Gryglew1cz said nght and some of those actlo<.s moving, fitting some of the retenllon areas can net more
leasable land, which win provide the General Fund, or whatever fund lhe Council determines, wlth more revenue
In the future
Mayor Woodward asked 11 there were any other questions
Council Member Jeffersor said with the land prep, I know th,s stuff needs to be done to make lh,s land
marhtable, I understand that, but I guess at some r olnt. its still fairly far in the future . I rrean I don't know
exactly when that RTD rail Is going to head In that direction , but I think II Is hke 2015 or s01mthlng hke that and I
donl know, I am 1ust wondering 1f there Isn't more em1nent tSsues hke the Bates st. on .. that we could use
this funding for
Mayor Woodward said this funding is part of the Englewood McLenan Reservoir Foundat10n money, so ti ,s a
httle more d1lf1cult lhan Just being General Fund money and whore II would be coming from
Englewood City Council April 7, 2008 Page 10 Council Member Jefferson said so we could ask them to put It ,n the General Fund or not? My concern, I'm JUSt bringing this up I mean will EMRF come back to us when they are actually moving this dirt for approval to spend those funds No? Mayor Woodward said I Delteve they will come oack, won I they? c,ty Manager Sears said maybe Mike could help us. Unfortunately, Rock was unable to come ton1ghl. but I know
that the Intention of this was to have at least some of the elements of tt,e development, and the relocation of Ille
d11t and the work, t-:> at least report to Cour,cll on the progress
Deputy City Manager Flaherty said we actualy have a lease pending at this point and that is near -:omplet,on on
one of the p,operties that does require elClens,v? grading That is the same p,operty that J,m po,nte.1 01.1 that
we will be doing storm sewer wo11\ on it as well In add1t10n, we have a second proposal before us no"· that we
wlli be responding to this week . II will potentially require some additional Improvemen ts. However, 1f :ounc,r
desires, we will report to Council on any and .;II of our act1v1ty at Council's request
Council Member Oakley sa.d the reason I brought the proposal foni,ard, and made the mobon, IS tr.at obviously
we went into great detail on this before last years election And even d10ugh RTO is not g01ng to be gomg in
there until 2014, land development Is beg,nn,ng almost immediately And that Is the reason ... we thought this
was a windfall actually, for RTD to be able lo pay us for this tand ... lhe only one who can ... and give us some
money to go ahead and get this land ready for development
•
Mayor Woodward said lhal is the other poin~ the negabve number here 1s SS00,000.00 Is RTO paying us for
that gr.K' ng? But t think there ,s some of the other grading .. and I think ~·s ... planning area 84, Mike, or maybe
11 ,s 85, where the housing development 1s going In, where we are moving some dirt for them I mean It i s a •
complicated thing that is going on. One of the things that very well could happen Is with the lease revenues
from some of these properties , which Includes revenues to the General Fund, which will be coming In later, and
as you have mentioned the revenues can be used for projects such as Bates Stallon . I mean, obv10usly, we
could look at that sort of thing, as far as Bales Stabon Ifs ompo,ianl that we get this grading done to ensure
that the land is in the most valuable cond,t,on as soon as possible I do no1 believe, personally, that that
necessar,ly means that we should tease 11 as soon as possible But tt would be cheaper to do rt now than ,1 will
be three to five years from now, or ten years from now. Council Member Jefferson said you mean moving the
dirt Is going to be cheaper now? Mayor Woodward said yes .
Director GrygleWicz said the Mayor did ment1011 that we may not lease this Immediately, but that It -.viii be
avadable for lease much sooner and this WIii p,oduce a long tenn revenue stream for the Caty that can do other
p<OJecls
Counc,t Member Jefferson said I totally ag1s e with that Frank and I hope my point isn't mistaken I understand
that this Is what needs to be done I JUSI want lo be reassured that, strategically, we're outlaying this money at
the nght tome consldenog au of the other things that we need funding for.
Mayor WoodWard asked of there was any other dJscusslon There was none
Vote ros ulls:
Moboncamed
Ayes
Nays
Absent
Council Members Penn, McCashn. WoodWard . Jefferson, Wilson, Oakley
None
Counc,I Member Moore
(Ii) Director Gryglewlcz presented a recommendahon from the Finance and Admtnistrahve •
Services Department to approve a resolution autho•izing a supp lemental appropnat,on to the 2008 Budgat and a
year-end supplemental appropriat10n to the 2007 Budget He said for 2008, what occurred was actually a
clerical om1ss100 of these three items and the GenP.ral Fund, under source of funds for legislatoon, ll>ere was not
an account,ng for Keep Englewood Beau1,fuf contnbutoons or $15,000 00 and the use or those funds which wlll
aclua'ly go to the General Fund unreserved, undesignatcd fund balance In the Water Fund, the source oi
•
•
•
Engl ewoo d Cit y Co uncil Ap ril 7 , 20 08 Pag e 11 fund~ .. ,s ava il ab:e fund s and wha t was no t appropr iat ed were prem iums for the property and li ab ihty insu ran ce . The Sewer Fund . aga ,n. lhe so urce of fun ds is avai lab le fu nds and lhe use of the fu nds is for property an d liab ility insurance premiu ms of $7,960.00. For 2007 , and th ,s occu rs prelly much every year , I don 't thin k I've eve r seen a year where we did no t have a supplementa l at the end of the yea r, and generally , we don 't know the amoun ts until we put the annua l financial report together and these show up becau se, a tot of tim es , bills are not received in a timely manne r an d then the bud get goes over for some anl ic,pated expen ditu re and we need to come to Council. tn thi s case , for the Gene ral Fund , the source of funds for th is was $11 ,876.00 from
unreserved , undes lgnated fund ba lance to transfe r to the Dono r's Fund to make it whole because they had
overspent by that amo un t or for projects that they completed . In the Donor's Fund, the source of funds was
$112,000.00 . Of tha t, the trans fer In from the Gene ral Fu nd of $11 ,876 .00, from the reserved fund balance fo r
Safety Serv ices $50,000.00 and from the unreserved , undes ignated fun d balance , $50,124 .00. And aga ,n, th e
use of those funds was the Keep Englewood Beau ti ful Donor's Fund programs , Safety Serv ices Donor's Fund
program was $50,000.00, and the Recreat ion Donor's Fund programs were $31,000.00 . Also , In 20 07, the
Comm ercia l Revo lving Loan Fu nd prov ided a grant to the Micro Business Developme nt and that was
$69,800.00 and that came form the unr eserved , undes ignated fund balance . In the Parks and Rec Trus t Fund ,
there were sch olarsh ips lha l were provi ded for $1 ,800.00 and the fund s fro m th at came from fund balan ce. In
the Ce ntral Services Fund , the re wa s more business activi ty, so the use of funds fo r cost of goods sold , the
source was reta ine d earn ing s. Paving Dis trict 38 , the sou rce of funds there were assessmen t revenues and the
use of tho se was inter es t on long-term debt of $8 10.00 .
COUNCIL MEMBER OAKLEY MOVED , AND COUNCIL MEMBER McCAS LI N SE CONDED, TO APPROVE
AGENDA ITEM 11 (c) (II ) -RESOLUTION NO . 35 , SERIES OF 2008 .
RE SOLUTI ON NO . 35, SERI ES OF 2008
A RESOL UTIO N APPROV ING A SUPP LEMEN TAL APP ROPR IATION TO THE 2007 AN D 2008 BUDGETS
FOR IT EMS NOT PREVI OUSLY APP ROPR IATE D.
Mayo r Wood ward ask ed ii there we re any commen ts or questions. The re were no ne.
Vote results :
Mot ion carried .
Ayes .
Na ys .
Absen t
Counc il Mem bers Penn, Mccaslin, Woodward , Jefferso n, Wil son , Oa kley
None
Counc il Member Moo re
Mayor Woodward sa id than k you Frank .
12 Genera l Discuss ion
(a) Mayo (s Cho ice
(1) Mayor Woodwa rd said la st week one of t~P En glew ood Education Fo undation Board
membe rs spoke to me about the ir Fa ll Fling They have sc hedut eJ nd , Just li ke last yea r. they want to utilize
space withi n City Ce nter ... Hampde n Hall and the Communi ty Ro· , What they were as:.ing is ii they cou ld get
a waive r cl the fees fo r use of th e fac ,lo ty , less the actua l co st of c:• ·1,>llal costs , etc . 01 tho~e actual ha rd costs
that might be required to put on that event . by staff . f think you all !,now tha t the Eng lew~u<i Educat ion
Fo undation supports Englewood Schoo ls. This is their ann ual, large st fund raising even t and it is anot her
opport unity to partne r wi th the schoo l d1stnct in supporti ng tt,e schoo ls.
MAYOR WOODWARD MOVED , AND COUNCIL MEMBER MCCASLIN SECONDED , TO WAIVE THE FEES
FOR THE ENGLEWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION 'S FALL FLI NG TO USE HAMPDEN HALL AND THE
COMMUN ITY ROOM .
Mayor Woodward as ked 1f the re was any discussion
Englewood City Council April 7, 2008 Page 12 Counc il Member Mccaslin said I've attended the lasl couple of years My wife is a principal ,n the schoo l district . and I fee l that II was a very well attended event And we moved from one area 10 anolher, lhe location was good . I had a greal lime I would like to see lhem do It again Mayor Woodward sa id !here were numerous comments thal I heard that ii was nice lo ,-;Jua ll y have 11 In Englewood , inslead of out of the City .
Council Member Mccaslin said two years ago lhey held it at INVESCO Field , wh ich is a nice venue , but I don 't
know what lhe cost was to the Englewood Foundation .
Mayor Woodward said before that it was at the cable build ing , so I th ink it Is nice to have it in lhe City
Counci l Member Mccaslin said the last three years , except for tasl year , It has been out of the CIly .
Mayor Woodward asked if there were any other commenls . There were none .
Vote res ults:
Molion carried .
Ayes :
Nays :
Absent
Council Members Penn , Mccaslin, Woodward , Jefferson , Wilson , Oak ley
None
Council Member Moore
(ii) Mayor Woodward said I have a Council Request. For Bob and anybody else that's on
KEB , Alan , I wou ld like to find out the status of the Adopl-A-Streel program. There have been discussions, lhat
•
have been going on for a couple of years . I know thal there are students and other groups that are inleresled In •
partlcipaling In lhat program . I would like to find cul the status on that.
Council Member Mccaslin sa id if I could comment We have a KEB meeting tomorrow night , so I can bring it
up , It might be a great time for discussion and Alan, if you want lo put in a Council request after the meeUng . I'll
le t you know .
(b) Council Members' Choice
(i) Council Member Penn :
1, He said I would like lo thank my friends from EYSA for coming by and sharing their projecl with us . I
encourage Jerrell lo conlinue working closely wdh ll 1em. Hopefully , we can assist them as much as we can with
the fields and the operalions , and I know that Jerrell has some other Ideas lo help them . I know my good friend
Bob is going to make a motion in just a little bit. Where we can help them with the volunteers and host fam ilies .
hopefully, they will come back to us and we can continue to help them .
2. He said regarding the people who spoke about Kent Place ... il'J changed so many times that I'm kind of
like them . I really don 't know where they're going or where we are going to go with th is thing . I would like to see
maybe the developers go back to the citizens again and find out what they are thinking, because I don '! th ink
they have the same thought process going on that they originally came to us with six or seven years ago I tru ly
encourage them to go back into the community and find out what's going on and possibly h~ten to some of their
concerns
3. He sa id Kim, I'd love to be there Saturday . but on ly If It doesn't snow . If 11 snows, a lot of people
probably won't come . but I'd love to try that chil i and so , hope fully , we can get there .
4, He sa id I attended the Englewood Fire Department/ Eng lewood Poli ce Department Open Hous e It was •
a great time Thank yo u, There we re a lot of cItIzens there and a lot of great P.R. going on there
•
•
•
Englewood City Council April 7, 2008 Page 13 S He said regarding lhe Colorado Ra~ Author,ty We don't pay any money yet, bul they are kind of looking at me So. one of these days they are probably going to ask us to fork over a few doPars I don't know. Our protect now for Colorado Rall Authonty Is running anywhere from S7 billion to S44 b1lhon (11) Council Member McCasI1n
1 He said I would hke to thank the Eng lewood Sports for showing up ton lghl On behalf of the Englewood
Council, I would hke to make a mobOn I feel real cheap about this and I apologize, but I would like to make a
mobon that we donate S300.00, at least, 10 get you started or to help you out A<ld again. I know what n Is go,ng
to cost you to run it and I appreciate aN of your wOllk Being an umpire for 39 years, I know what ,t Is going to
take to run 11 I wis h I could give you more
COUNCIL MEMBER MCCASLIN MOVED, ANO COUNCIL MEMBER PENN SECONDED , TO APPROVE A
DONATION OF $300.00 FOR THE ENGLEWOOD YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION MIDWEST PLAINS
REGIONAL SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT.
Mayor Woodward asked if that would be coming from City Councirs budget Council Member McCasl,n sa id
yes, 11 wou ld be coming from City Council's budget
Mayor Woodward said we have a contingency fund I believe or $1000 00, within the Council budget ts there
any discuss,on?
Council Member Jefferson asked Is that $1000,00 generally used at our discretion?
Mayor Woodward said we have S 1000.00 for the year tc. ulilize for different things that may come alOng . For
example, something llke lhls or lhe firemen, fo, example. going to some of their trainings or their compet,t,ons,
where they've done real well, or Indivtduals that may come in lhat need something That's part of the City
Council budge~ ii you haven't seen IL
Council Member Penn said I am lil<e Bob I w,sh we could 91Ye more and if there ,s any way we can help, to try
to get you more mon ey, we w,11 work with you.
Mayor Woodward said LIia , I wou ld like to thank you and your family for all of the years that you've spent wrth
and fo, the youth of Englewood It's a lot I know I've seen you out there, both you an d Tom and the kids and
you too Judy
Council Member Penn said maybe you could have Bob OH1C1ate fo, rree. Council Member McCashn said oh no
Maybe for half pnce, but not for free. Ms, Downing said we already have a job for Bob Council Member
McCashn said I'm sure you do There was laughter
Mayor Woodward asked ~ there was any other d1scuss1on There was none
Vote results:
Moboncarned
Ayes
Nays
Absent·
Counci l Members Penn, McCasltn, Woodward, Jeffer.;on, Wilson, Oakley
Nono
Council Member Moore
2 He said I would hke to bnng up the Kent Place Again, this has changed hands a couple of times, I
think , but weren't there some community meehngs with lt\e developers and the residents? I thought that lhey
were pretty much on the same page, They talked about the shadowing or the housing
Mayor Woodward said wel l, there's been a change
Council Member Mccaslin sa id nght Thal s what I'm try1r,o to clear in my m,nd Was that the r.-st developer
that came ,n? I know they spcc1hcaffy addressed that Iss11. ,bOut the shadowing
Englewood City Council April 7, 2008 Page 14 Mayor Woodward said It was the first developer and II was also the second developer that came In, while you were ht!re, that showed the shadowing studies From what I understand, m the P & Z public heanng, they had some shadowing studies also I've also heard that there were some people, that may have been here ton,ghl I don't know. that weren t aware of the shadOwing studies or dldn1 look into the shadowing studies .. or hadn't paruc,paled p,ev1ously There's a number of rtems though, that these people have brought up, that we haven't seen. that I haven't seen or know wha1 thDI entails
Council Member Mccaslin said okay fhal was my ques,1on I do remember the conversation. Thank you
Mayor Woodward said I think that's something Alan, thal you may want to pass on to Continuum, that when they
come here that they need to have their shadowing studies ready to present
Coorocit Member Penn sakl may I add? I think they put this hotel thing in here also. that we've not even heard
anything about Ifs something of a concern We need to take a look at it and see what happens with that too
Mayor Woodward said I agree Alan, do you have something to add?
Director White said I'll pass that 1nformat10n along, They did have the new shadowing mformat1on available at
the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing last month and you will see that lnlormatlon as well.
3. He said I will be one of the judges and my wife will be one of the judges, at the chili cook-off. So. bnng
some Zantac. We'll see you Saturday Thank you
(VI) Council Member Qakley-
1 He said I too would hke to thank the Englewood Youth Sports Associauon for bonging the toumament to
Englewood and, hopefully, we've done, at least something for you.
2, He said since I've read that the Kent project was coming back to us again, I can't help but think of our
rushing last fall to try to help things along, with the last presentation we had, And now here lhey are com ing
back with another one, so I feel that this thing Is dragging on a long time and I think we ought to get this before
us to see what we can do.
(rv) Council Member Wilson
1 She said I lh,nk thal this softball tournament ,s a great lh1ng. 1t 1s a communi,y budder and I
congratulale you Thank you for all of your hard work
2 She said I also allended the Museum of Outdoor Arts and the Juned Art Show on Friday and I think It
was well rece ived I enjoyed thal
3 She said lhe people on Ogden Street lhat senl the lelter and 1he petition I have emailed them for
addresses for all of the pecple, bul I didn't have a chance lo check my email, so I dorn have that But, I lhink
we need to see hOw this was dorie. what happened, whal kind of policy was decided on and if we can get copies
of that to figure It out because this did not come before Counol Correct? Gary? Dan? City Attorney Brotzman
satd correct
Coonol Member Wilson said we need lo see whal happened and how we gol here and lhen see what we wanl
lo do about thal Was lhere an• other infomnation we wanted to ask for?
•
•
Council Member Oakley said no There was a leller from Alan thal we gol tonight: It was In my box Ma1•be I •
~n Jusl address you Alan You explained lhe sltua11on In August 2006 and a Council discussion And lhal
d1scuss10n doesn't come lo mind so I need some clanficallon on thal
Counol Member Wison sa,d ,I we could gel a copy of that Study Sess10n to find out what hawened
•
•
•
Englewood City Council April 7, 2008 Page 15 Community Development Director White said I'll need some help on minutes fo, Sludy Session I don'l th,nk we have those City Manager Seats said Afan wasn1 here in 2006 We have had some staff d1SCUss10ns this letter did go out We do have a policy that we can lorwatd to Coty Council on what the Council was rev,ew,ng at that point in tome but in terms of any minutes, we'll pull that together Since ,1 was a Study Session, there may not be minutes
Council Member WIison sa,d were there any changes to the ordinance?
Mayor Woodward said I thin k ii was a discussion concerning the UDC . As I recall, we were discussing slgnage
and some of the things that may have been lacking In the UDC which needed to be addressed That we need to
give the City Manager, or Community Development through the C,ty Manager. the ability to address some
things I think ff staff looks at slgnage. they may be able to f111d ii.
Coty Manager Sears said I know Iha! Nancy Reid was at that meebng and there was discussion about thP
proposed clean-up ordinance and lhe policy would be part of that. I don't know the status of that or why thal
wasn't done at that point In time That Is exactly what Alan was referencing, so we have sent the letter out, we
can provide the policy lo the Council and we will provide Council with a summary of how that policy has been
used and where lhe status Is legally, especially as It relates 10 codificatio n of that policy.
Council Member Wilson said , also, has anyone else used II? Do we have that information in the City? The 5%?
Director White said I can lell you that no one else has used it
Counctl Member Wilson said okay Thanks So. if we can get that mfoonatJon. if everyone agrees 10 thal
befOl'e we can make any decisions or go folward
4. She said I would like a copy of the ordinance that created EMRF and EEF, and how thal was created
and how 11 was determined who would be on that comm11tee ... those two committees So. I would hke to see
!hose as a Council Request
5. She said I have Information that was in the paper and It's on the Solar Finance Plan Heats Up II ls
'•ou· a Bill 1350 and Ir we could pass this on down and. as a Council request. see what we can do to Implement
.. ra:,,, help ,mplement ,t I think that would be a huge bonus fo, the City. that we could offer
Maior Woodward said J,tt ,I I could Just mention something Council Member Wilson said go ahead
1/ayor Woodward said last week al the Metro Mayor's Caucus meebng. winch ,s made up of 37 or 38 mayors
\\ ·111n the Merro area , we did a letter to Representative Allee Madden. She is the one behind this Bill 1350,
regar~1ng the fac,hlat,on of the financing of renewable energy. After discussing this w,th Dan , I put my name to
1hal as Mayo r, nol representing City Council I Just want lo pass out that letter of support from the Metro
Moyofs Caucus l o everyone here Tha l was also done In regards to transportation
6 She said atx>ut Kent Place .. they will be coming here lo present their plan? What's the next step?
Crty AttOl'ney Brotzman said the next step ,s the fltSI reading and they win estabNsh a pubhc hearing at Iha!
bme Then lhe developer w.11 have a formal presenta110n al the public heanng
Council Member Wilson sa,d Ol<ay, w1ll tha1 be at a meeting? Clly Attorney Brotzman said that's at a regular
Council meeting Ms Wilson said the presentation? Mr Brotzman said yes. Ms WIison said okay I think we
need lo see where It's going and how it's going to alfecl lhe residents. Because everyone, at the beginning of
lhls proJecl, was In total agreemenl and now lhat I lhlnk we have some people thnl are upset, we need to
address those issues I was hearing about Kent Place before I even gol on Council, so It's been go,ng on a long
time
M Council Member Jefferson
Englewood City Council April 7, 2008 Page 16 1 He said I'm basically goo•g to second a lot that's been said. Ms . Downing and the Englewood Youlh Sports, thanks for bringing a creat event to our communily 2. He said I appreetale hearing the concarns of the !olks regarding Kent Place . I cerlalnly understand that ii Is emollonal and an important Issue for the neighbors and surrounding commun,tles I would encourage them to be a part of the public hearing. I will cartalnly keep In mind, go:ng forward , that reducing the lmpacl on our
surrounding neighborhoods has got lo be a priority
3 He said Kim. I'm looking forward to the ch,U, on the 12"'.
4 He said I WIii second the idea that we do need some more background Info on that Ogden situation
13 City Manager's Report
(a) City Manager Sear5 said, unfortunately, Rick Kahm was taken to the hospital this morning. He
seems 10 be In good shape. I talked to him about 4 00 this afternoon. He had an MRI and It appears that all the
signs he exhlbiled were not serious. So, hopefully he w,11 be getting better and we'll keep Council posted as he
has some additional tests.
(b) City Manag er Sears said I received a call, through Mike Flaherty, from Littleton about setting up
a Tri-City meeting, We're going lo try to set a Tri-City meeting up. I guess it's our turn to do that In May and so
we'! be sending out information to Council about some times lo do thal
Mayor Woodward said just to clarify for the new membe11,; the Tri-City meeting Is Littleton, Sheridan and
Englewood
14. City Attorney's Report
(a) City Attorney Brotzman presented a motion to approve settlement of the E F Johnson Case
No. 07 CV 1995 upon payment to the City of $80,000.00 He said that's the potoce rad10 case.
COUNCIL MEMBER OAKLEY MOVED, AND COUNCIL MEMBER McCASLIN SECONDED, TO APPROVE A
SETTLEMENT OF THEE. F. J 'JHNSON CASE NO. 07 CV 1995 UPON PAYMENT TO THE CITY OF
$80,000.00.
Mayor Woodward asked If there was any discussion , There was none.
Volt rosulta:
Motion carried
Ayes:
Nays·
Absent
15 Adjournment
Councd Members Penn. Mccaslin, Woodward , Jefferson, Wilson, Oakley
None
Councd Member Moore
l he meeting adioumed at 9 05 p m
•
•
•
•
•
•
From: Ken Bronson (mailto:ken.bronson :g;springbokservices.com]
Sent: Tuesday. April 08. 2008 7: 11 AM
To: Audra Kirk
Subject: resign fonn the KEB committee
H~llo,
I wo11ld like 10 resign fo nn the KEB commi ttee. I thank you for the opportunity to serve the city.
Kenneth Bronson
Ken Bronson
Operations Manager
ken .bronson@springbokservices .com
wv.w.SpringbokServices.com
PLEASE PRINT
PUBLIC COMMENT ROSTER AGENDA ITEM 7 UNSCHEDULED VISITORS DATE : April 21 , 2008
UNSCHEDULED VISITORS MAY SPEAK
FOR A MAXIMUM OF FIVE MINUTES
,.,_NAM=E=---__ ___,A.:.::Da.::Da.:..R::E.:.SS~---------T.....,__O,l;'_IC __
~N fr;tJ.e ~l.~5 W Uh/on &,c.
•
•
•
CO UNCIL COMM UNICATION Dale: Agenda Item: Subj ect: Apri l ~ I , 2008 9 a I Englewood Lions Club Train Mai111enance Agreement Initiat ed By: Staff Source:
Departmenl of Public Works Rick Kal1m, Dire~l or
Pa t While, Fleel /..,anager --
CO UNCIL GOAL AND PREVIO US COUNCI L ACTION
Council's goal Is to utilize intergovernmental and interagency cooperative opportunities. Similar
opportunities have occurred with Englewood Schools, City of Cherry Hills Village, and 1he City of
Sheridan.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends Council approve a BIii for an Ordinance authorizing 1he Mayor to sign an agreement
with the Englewood Lions Club .
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, ANO ALTER NATIVES IDENTIFIED
Since 1999, the City of Englewood has provided mainlen.ince services lo the Eni;lewood Lions Club for
their train, which operates at Belleview Park during the summer mon1hs. For 2008, the City will
perform maintenance at a rate of S68 per hour, which is 1he same rate charged to 1he City of Sheridan,
Englewood Schools, and the City of Cherry Hills Vil lage.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
TI1e hourly rate of $68 per hnur, plus a 30% mark up on parts, will cover the Cl 1y's e~penses for
sel\ ices perionned. It is estuna ted that, In 2008. the City of Englewood w,11 realize revenue in the
amount of SJ,000.
UST OF ATTACHM ENTS
Bill for an Ordinance
•
•
•
ORDINANCE NO SCRIES OF 2008 BY AUTHORln· A BILL FOR COUNCIL BILL NO. IS INTROOUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBEII ___ _
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY vi
i,NGLEWOOD. COLORADO, AND ENGLEWOO D LIONS CLUB FOR
MAINTENANCE OF THE ENGLEWOOD LIONS CLUB MINI \TUR£ TRAl1"
WHEREAS. 1hc Englewood Lb ns Club oppro.1ched 1hc City regarding con1r11c1:r11
"1th ,t.e City for maintenance of their miniature train. which is opct 11ed and housed at
Belleview Park; and
WHEREAS, the Englewood Cit)• Council appro,cd an agreemcnl between
Englewood and 1hc Englewood Lions Club for main1enancc of the miniature train by 1hc
passage of Onlinance No. 10, Series of 2003: and
WHEREAS. the Comract authorized the extension of the services for three additional
one year periods to bt nceotiated by the City Manager or his dcsigncc and extensions
10 the Comract \\1.rr.comple1ed for the years of 2005, 2006. and 2007: and
WHEREAS, lhe City of Englewood and the Englewood Lions Club Jesire 10 eominuc
such agreement whereby Englewood shall provide the E111dewood Lions Club with
maintenance of the Englewood Lions Club miniature train: and
WHEREAS. the passage of1h:s proposed Ordinance au1hona:s nn Agreelll<'nl
bclween Englewood and the Englewood Lions Club for maintenance of 1he Mimalure
Trnin for a one year period and includes a provision for nn ex1cnsion of services for three
addi1ional one year periods:
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY ll >l'NCIL OF TIIE CITY OF
ENG LEWOOD. COLORADO. AS FOU.OWS:
~-The Con1rac1 be1ween 1he Ci1y of En~le\\<XKI. Colorado nnd 1h, , .. ood
Lions Club pcnaining 101hc mamlcnancc of the F.nglc"ood Lions Club Miniaiure Train,
a1111ched BS "bluhll A", is hereby accep1cd nnd approved by lhc 1,nglcwood CilyCouncil
Sccuon 2. The City Mnnnger 1s au1horizc,! 10 •~
sen t 1he Co111 rnc1 for and on behalf of 1hc Ci1 v of r ·
nnd cxcculc cx1cns1ons nf1h:s C'omrac1 for 1hrcc.
111d lhc Ci1y Clerk lo n11cs1 and
100, Colorado: wd 10 ntt(>liatc
,nnl one yea r periods.
lm roduccd. read in full. nnd pa-.scd on !irs1 rt'3ding on 1t.e 21 SI day of April. 2008 .
-1-
Published as n llill for ar. O!'Jinance on 1he 15th day of April, 100S. i\1TEST· James K. Woodward, Mayor
Loucnshia A. Ellis. Ci1y Clerk
l, Loucrishia A. Ellis. Ci1y Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby ccnify 1ha1
the above and forcgoinr is a lrue copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full,
and passed on first reading on lhe 21" day of April. 2008.
Loucris hia A. Ellis
-2-
•
•
•
•
•
•
CONTR<\CT m 1 ACR£E~IE ;i-, entered L~I O tlus __ day of:c-:-------:::-:· 200 by and bel\\'Ccn tbe C11y of Englewood, ,.-ho c address i.• 1000 Englewood Parl.·way, Englewood , Colorado SOl 10 and The Englewood Lton s Club, whose address is P.O. Box 205, Englewocd, Colorad o ~O J 5 l. TERM OF CO ITR.\CT
'OW THEREFOR£, IT l ACR£ED by and betwa:n thc City of Englewood and Englewood
Lions Club tbat:
I, The City of Englewood shall , ar.cording 10 a schedule to be made by the Englewood
Lions Club and approved by the City of Englewood, pcrfonn maincenoncc of che
Englewood Lions Club miniature tnin and shall also perform repairs requcsccd by
Englewood Lions Club or identified by lhe City of Englewood during inspection of
the miniature train .
2. '!be Chy of Englewood shall repair lhe miniature train of lhc Englewood Lions Club
delivered 10 the City of Englewood fo r th at purpose in a good, workmanlike mnnnor .
3. The Eng lewood Lions Club sha ll pay to lhe City of Englewood for such services the
sum ofslxty-cighl Dollars ($58.00) per hour, in addicion lo lh c cost 10 lhc Chy of
Englewood ofnny parts or ou tside vendo r charges .
4. The City of Englewood will proceed with the performance of the services called for
in Paragraph o. I on January I, 2008 and the Coniracl shall cermin.ite on December
31, :?008 . TI11ee additional one (I) year periods may be ocgotiaced by tbe City
Manager or bis dcsignee .
5. The Cicy of Englewood and lhe Englewood Lions Club agree not to: refuse to hire,
discharie, promote, demote or discnlll10ate in any matter of compensation:
performance, services or otherwise, against any person otherwise qualified solely
because of rate, creed, sex, color, nalional origin or ancestry.
6. This Contract may not be moci,ficd, amended or otherwise alccr-cd unless mutually
agreed upon in wnting by the panics.
7. "lbe Cicy of Englewood by and through ,ts employees and agents shall be considered
for all purpose., of the Controct, to be independent comr.ictors and not employees of
the Englewood Lions Club .
The En glewood Lions Club by and through its employees and agcncs shall be
considered for all purposes of the Contnct, to be independent concmctors and not
,·mployccs of the Cuy of Englew~"ld .
-1-
a I • t A
9 The Cuy of Englewood shall nol nssign or u-ansfcr us m1eres1 in 1he Cc uract wuhou1 1hc wnncn consent of the Engle1>'00d Lions Club. Any unaulhorizcd 1s.ignmcn1 or 1ransfcr shall render tlus Contra<.! null. v01d and of no effect as hJ lhc Englewood Lions Club. I 0. The Eni;le1>'0od Lions Club shall not assign or lrnnSfcr i's in1m;st in lhe Con1ract withou1 the wnuen consent of the City ofEngJewood. .,i unnuthoriud assignment
or transfer shall rcodcr the Contrael null, void and of n. ::•ea ~• to the Ci1y of
Englewood.
11 . Either pa11y of the Conlract may terminate the Contract by giving 10 the other pany
30 days no1icc, in writing, with or withoul good cause shown. Upon delivery of such
notice by the Englewood Lions Club 10 the City ofEncJewood and upo· ClCpirntion
of the 30 day period, the City of Englewood shall discon1inue all servi, .s m
COMCClion wilh the pcrfonnnnce of the Conlt3ct. As soon as practicabl after
rcceipl of notice of tcnnina1ion, the City of E,,glewood shall submit a statement,
showing In detail lhe services perfonne~ under the Contracl 10 the dale of
1ermination. The Englewood Lio11s Club shal' then pay the City of Englewood
promplly lhal proportion of the prescribed cbr~es w· .. h the services actually
performed under 1he Contract bear 10 the u,u,1 : ·rvi: ; called for under the Contracl,
less such payments on account of the charge. ,;s ' . .,~ , en previously made.
12. Al l notices and eommuniC11tions under the Contr>ct to be m•iled or delivered to the
City of Englewood shall be to the following address:
Director of Public Works
City ofEnglewood
I 000 Englewood Parl'Way
Englewood, Colorado 80110
All no1ice. •nd c01M1uoications pertaining to th.: Contract shill be mailed or
delivered to the Englewood Lions Club at the following address:
Englewood Lions Club
P.O. Box
Englewood, Colo: 8015 1
13. The tenns anJ conduioos of the Com, t shall be binding upon each enuty, 11s
SUC.:CSSOII and assigilS.
14. Nothing herein 5h31) be c:onslrUcd as creating any personal liability on the pan of ony
officer or agcn1 or any public body which may be• party hereto, nor shnll it be
construed ns giving any rights or benefits hereunder 10 oayonr other lhan the
Englewood Lions Club nnd the City of Englewood.
-2-
•
•
•
IN \\lTNESS WHEREOF, 1hc panics hereto have executed lhis Contract the day and )'ear first wrmcn above.
ATTEST: CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
Loucrishia A. Elli s, City Clerk James K. Woodward, Mayo r
ATTEST: EI\CLEWOOD LIONS CLl •
•
•
COUNCIL COMMUN ICAT ION Date: Agenda Item: Subject: April ~1. W08 a ii City of Cherry Hills Villa ge Fleet Maintenance Agree ment Initiated By: Staff Source :
De pa rtment of Pu blic Vvorks Rick Kahm, Director
Pat Whi te. Fl eet Manager
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Counci l st ri ves to pr omote a coope rati ve environment with Intergovernmen tal agencies. Cou ncil has
approved fleet mainten ance agreements with th e City of Ch erry Hills Village since 2003 .
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff reco mmends Coun cil apprm e a Bill for an Ordinan ce auth orizing the Mayo r to sign an
Intergovernmental Agreement wi th the City of Che rry Hills Village for :?008 flee t maintenance provision .
BACKG~OUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
The Cit \' of Englewoo d has provided fle et maintenance services for Cherry Hil ls Village since 1003. For
2008, the City will perform fleet maintenance at a rat e of $68 per ho ur, which is th e same ra te charged
to th e City of Sheridan, Englewood Schools, and the Eng lewood Li ons Club Train.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Th e hourl y ra te of S68 per hour, plus a 30 % mark up on parts, will cove r all expe ns es incurred by th e
City of Englewood. II is es tim ated that , in 2008, the City of Englewood will rea li ze reven ue in th e
amount of $70,000 .
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Bill fo r an O rdinan ce
In tergovernmen tal Agreemen t
•
•
•
ORDINANCE N•.J. Sl:RIES OF 200.l DY \UTHORITY ABILL FOR COUNCIL BILL NO. 16 INTRODUCED DY COUNCIL ME~113ER ____ _
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENf
BmVEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO. ,\.",m THE CITY OF
CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE. COLORADO, WHEREBY THE Cl t) OF ENGLF\' ~· ,I)
Wil.L PROVIDE THE CITY m CHERRY HlLLS VILLAGE Wffil VEHICLE
MAINTENANCE.
WHEREAS, the Caty of En11lewood has ogrcem.:nts with other govcmmcn1al entities mr
the scrviein_g of the vehicles of those entitles since 1992; and
WHEREAS, the City of Englewood and the City of Cherry llills V11lnge entered 11110 an
intergovernmental agreement whereby Englewood provided Cherry Hills Villngc with
vehicle maintenance by the passage of Ordinance No. 9. Series of 2003: nnd
WHEREAS. the Contrnct authorized 1he extension of the serv ices for three additional
one year pcri<>ls to be negotiated by the City Manager or his designce and extensions 10
the Contract were completed fnr the years 2005. 2006 and 2007: and
WHEREAS. the City of Englewood and the City ofC'heny lhlls Village desire to
continue such agreement "hereby Englewood shall pm,,de the City of Cherry Jhlls
V,llnyc with maintenance of their vehicles; and
WHEREAS. the passage of this proposed Ordinance authorizes an Intergovernmental
Agreement bc1ween Englewood and the C11y of Cherry Hill s Village for m:iintenancc of
their vehicles for a one ycor period and includes a provision for an extensi(ln ~f services
for three additional one ycnr periods:
NOW. THEREFORE, BE 11' ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNC IL OF TIIE CITY
OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO. AS FOLLOWS:
Section I. l .1e imergm emmcn1al Oh'fCemenl between the City of Cherry Hill s Village.
Colorado, and the City ofl:.nglc"ood· Colorndo, for vehicle nmintcnoncc. auoched as
"falubit A". ts hereby accepted and appro,·cd h)' the Englcw<>NI Cuy Council.
Section~-The Ma)-or ,s authunt.l-d to e.~ccutc and the Cit) Clerk to attc;I and seal 1hc
Agreement for and on behalf of the Cuy of Englewuod, Colorado.
Section 3. The Cil)' Manai;cr" authon,cJ to negotiate and sign and the <II) Ckrl Ill
attest and seal any extensions of this Contract for thn,e additional one year I d, for and
on beha lf of the City of Eni:lew0<xl. C'olorodo:
h11roduced. read in full. ond p:,sscd on firsl rending on the 21st dny of April. 2008 .
-1 -
Pubh,hed as • B111 for an Ord,n..ncr ,n 1h< 25'" da~ or Apnl. 2008. James K Woodward. Ma)'or ATTEST
Loucrislua A. Ellis. Ci1y Cltrk
I. Loucnshift A. Ellis. C11yClcrk or the Cny of Englewood. Colorado. hereby cc11ify 1ha1
the above nnd foregoing is a 1ruc copy of a Bill for an Ordmnnce, inlroduccd. read In full.
and passed on firs1 reading on 1hc 21 sl day of April , 2008.
Loucrishia A. Ellis
-2-
•
•
•
•
•
•
CONTRACT TIIIS AGREEMENT. entered into llus __ dayof ____ , 2008 by and bct\\ecn the City of fnglewood, whose address ,s 1000 Englewood Parkway, Englewood. Colorado 80110 and Ille Cuy ofChcny H,11s Village, wnosc address is 2450 E. Quincy Ave. Cheny Hills Village, COSOI 10. T ERMS OF CONTRACT
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by and between Ille City of Englewood and the City of
Chcny l hlls Village that:
I. The City ofEnglC\\ood . Colorado shall pcrfonn the following services:
111c City of Englewood shall pcrfonn all necessary repairs and mnmlcrumce on
the vehi~lcs owned by the City of Chc,ry Hills Village 10 the satisfaction of Ille
City ofCheny Hills, nnd the City ofChcny Hills shall pay 10 the City of
Englewood for such services the sum of six1y-eigh1 dollars ($68 .00) per hour, in
addition lo the cost 10 the City of Englewood of any parts or outside vendor
charges plus thiny percent (30%) handling fee.
2. The City o fEng lowood will proceed with the perfonnancc of the services c.11\cd for
in Paragraph No. I on January I, 2008 and lhe Contract shall 1enninate on December
31, 2008 . Three additional one (I) year periods may be negotiated by the City
M11nager or his designee .
3. Some maintenance of Lhc City of Chcny Hills Village's vehicles shall be pcrfonned
by the City or Englewood according 10 a schedule 10 be made by lhc City of Cheny
Hills Village and approved by the City of Englewood as part of this agreement, and
shJII include work requested by Chcny Hills Village or worl: identified by
Englewood during inspection ofthe vehicle.
4. The City of Englewood shall rc1"1r 11ny vehicles of lhe City or Chcny l:lills Village
delivered 10 the Cuy of Englewo:>d for that purpose in a good, workmanlike manner.
5. ThcCilyof Eng)e\\ood and lhcCi1yofCheny Hills Villagcagtce not 10: refuse: lo
lure, discharge, promole, dcmo1e or discriminate in any mailer or compensat ion:
pcrfonnnncc. sm~ccs o r 01hcrwisc, against any pct>On otherwise qualified solely
because of race. creed. sex, color, national origin or ancestry.
6. Tius Con1rac1 may not be modified. amended or otherwise altered unless mutually
ngrecd upon in writing by the panics.
7, The City or FJ1glcwood by nnd through its employees 11nd ngcnts shall be considered
for all purposes or the Co111rac1, 10 be indepc11dcn1 oon1rnc1ors and not emp loyees of
1hr. City or Cherry II ills Village.
8. TI1c City or Cherry Hills Village by and through its employees nnd agc,,ls shn ll be
coru;idcred for nil purposes or the Co01rac1, lo be independent con1rnc1011 and 1101
cm11loyecs of the Cuy of En glewood.
-1-
Q. TI1c Cny or Englewood shall 1101 ass1b11 or 1rnnsfor us 1ntcreS1 in the Con1rnc1 w11hou1 • 1hc wnncn conscm or 1he Cuy oi Che...-y I hlls \'tllage. Any unau1hon£Cd a«1snmen1 or 1ransrcr sh.,ll rc;,Jcr 1hc Comrac1 null, void and or no cfTCCI as 10 1hc C11 y ~r Cherry ~hlls V,!lngc. 10. Nc11hcr pony shall nol assign or lrnnsrcr 11s 1r.t crest m lhc Contract w,lhou1 1hc wnncn consent or lhc 01hcr pany. Any unauthonzcd assignmcn1 or transfer shall render 1hc Contract null, void and or no effect.
II. The Cny of Englewood shall be responsible for the professional quoli1y. 1cchnical
accuracy, 1imcly completion and lhc coordination of 1he repairs under the ContmCL
The Cny of Englewood shall, wilhou1 additional compcnsn1ion, correct or rcv,se any
errors, om,ssioru, or other deficiencies in ils smices related to the Con1rac1 .
12. Eilher pany of 1he Conlnlcl may 1ermina1e !he Contract by giving to 1hc olhcr pany
30 days notice in \l,iling with or withoul good cause shown. Upon delivery of such
notice by 1hc Cny or Cherry Hills Village to the City of Englewood and upon
expiration of !he 30 day period, the Ci1y of Englewood shall discontinue nil services
in connec1ion with 1he perfonru,nce of the Contract. As soon as prac1icnblc nfter
receipl of notice or termination, the Ci1y of Er.glcwood shall submit a stnlemcni,
showing in de1nil the services performed under 1hc Con1racl lo the dale of
termination. The Ci1y of Cherry Hills Village shall then pay lhe City of Englewood
promptly 1hn1 proportion of the prescribed charges which the services ac1unlly
performed under !he Contract bear 10 the total services called for under 1he Coniracl,
less such pgymcnts on account of the charges as have been previously mndc. • 13. All notices and eommunicnlions under the Contract 10 be mailed or delivered 10 the
Cuy of Englewood shall be to 1he following address:
Oirce1or or Public Works
City or Englewood
1000 Englewood Parkway
En&tewood, Colorado SO 110
All notices and communicntiolL'I pertaining to lhc Contract shall be n\11led or
delivered 10 the Ci1y of Cherry Hills Village a11he following address :
Director of Public Works
City of Cherry Hills Village
2450 E. Quincy Ave.
Cherry llills Village, Colorado 80113
14 . ·n,e terms and conditions of 1hc Con1rnc1 shall be binding upon c:ich Cuy, ils
successors ond assigns.
15. No1hing herein shall be construed as cre.,1ing any personal liability on 1hc pan of ony
officer or agent of nny public body wlueh may be party hereto, nor shall ii be
construed os giving any rights or bcncfils hereunder lo anyone olher 1hon 1ho Ci1y or
Cherry I lills Village nnd 1hc City of Fn~lcwood . •
-2-
•
•
•
16 nus Comrac1 1s 10 be G(I\Cmcd by 1hc lows of the S1a1< of Colorado. Venue for any pruceedmg brough1 in connecuon wnh 1!11s Con1rac1 .hall be m Arnpahoc Coun1y. \ 7 This Con1rac1 may be cxcculed in coun1crp:1ns, using manual, electronic or facsimile signa1ure, e:ich of which shall be deemed an origmal and all of which 1ogether shall eonsti1u1e one and the same rlocumcnl IN WITNESS WHEREOF, lhe panics here10 have cxccu1cd 1his Contract lhc day ond year firSI
wriucn above.
ATTEST: CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
Loucrishia A. Ellis, Cily Clerk Jomes 1(_ Woodward, Mayor
ATTEST: CITY OF CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE
, Mayor
, City Clerk
-3 -
•
•
•
ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 2008 13\' AUT I IORll \' COUNC'II. t3 1LL NO. 20 l:S:TROOUCFD BY COUNCIi. MEMB ER OAKLEY AN ORDll'\ANCE .\PPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMF.NT (IGA)
ENTITLED "CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN THE DENVER REGIONAL COUNC IL
OF GOVERNMENTS (DRCOG)" FOR REIMBURSEMENT TO THE cn·y Ol'
ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO FOR MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC SIGNAL
EQUIPMENT
WHEREAS. DRCOG received U.S. Depanmcn1 ofTransportauon Congestion
Mi1 ig1nion.'Air Quality (CM/AQ) funds through lhe Colorado Dcpanmcn1 of
Transporta11on (COOn 10 c:any out inffic sign.,! system improvcmcn15 and purchases in
lhe Denver mctropohlan region: and
WHEREAS. DRCOG desires 10 engage the c~n1rac1or for the purchase of
miscellnncous traffic sib'!lai equipment consis1er,1 with 1he Traffic Signal System
lmprovemenl Program: and
WHF.REAS. the City of Englewood ~ub1nincd an npplica1ion 10 DR COG for
011scclla1 .'O\IS equipment purchases through the FY07 Equipment Purchase Program; and
\VlllREAS. DRCOG is rcsp<';•s:ble for mon11oring oJKl admm1s1cring this Federal
program: and
WH EREAS. the City of Enc]ewoo<l has bee n awarded S24,000 1ownrds tl1e purchase of
mi;ccllnneou~ Im rtic signal cc1uipmc111 which includes lraflic slgnol cabinets and UPS
systems fo1 _\)()7: nnd
WHEREAS. the passage of this Ordinance au1honLes the imcrgovcnuncn1al agreement
allol'1ng DRCOG 10 reimburse 1hc City of EnpJcwood for miscellaneous traffic signa l
equipment:
NOW. THEREFORE. OE IT ORDAINED BY THE cm· COUNCIL OF rnE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO. AS FOLLOWS:
Section l. The City Council of Englewood. Colorado. hereby outhorizcs nn
mlcrgov,.mmcnlnl ngrcemenl (IGA) c01i1lcd "Con1rac1 by nnd Bc1wccn the i)en\'cr
Rcgiolll!I Council of Govcnuncnl, (DRCOG)" for reimbursement to 1hc City of
Engle11 ood. Colorado for miscellnncou11rnffic S1gnal <qu1pmcn1, a copy of ,.hich 1s
3llached hereto a• A1:achmcn1 I
-1 -
9bi
~ Inc ~IJ)or ,s hcrch) au1honzc-J 10 >1J;ll and the CU) Clerk 11> nttc,t s.11d 1111crgovcmmcniol ai:recmem (IGA) en111ted ··comrac1 by and Bc~\\een 1he Oemer Rcijil'lnnl C11unc1I ofGo,cmmc111< (DRCOGr for and on behalfor1hc Cil) or Lnplcwood. ln1roducc-d. read m full. and passed oo lirs1 reading oo 1he 'th da) of Apnl. :oo~ Published BS a 8111 for an Ordinance on the 111h day of April. 2008.
Read b) 1111c and passed on final reading on 1hc 21S1 day or Apnl. 2008.
Published b) 1111c as Ordinance No._. Series or 2008. on 1hc 251h da)• of Apnl.
2008 .
Jomes K. Woodward. Mayor
ATI'EST:
Loucrishio A. Ellis. Ci1y Clerk
I. Lou;rishin A. Ellis. Cily Clerk of1hc Ci1y of Englewood. Colorndo, hereby ccnify
1ha11hc above nud r.,rcgomg is a 1ruc copy of 1hc Ordin.,ncc passed on rmal rcadml[ and
publi,h<--d hy 1i1lc ns Ordinance No._. Series of 2008.
Loucnshia A. Elhs
-2 -
•
•
•
•
•
•
CONTRACl BY AND BETWEEN YHE DENVER REG IONAL COUNC IL OF GOVERNMENTS ("DRCOG") 1290 B· :>adway, Suite 700 Denver, CO 80203-5606 and
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
("CONTRACTOR")
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, CO 80110
?rOJer.t Number 543007 Contract Number EX08012
RECITALS :
A. DRCOG has received U.S. Oepartmenl of Transportation Congestion Mitigation/Air
Quality (CM/AO) funds through the Colorado Department of Transportation (COOT), to carry out
traffic signal system Improveme nts and purchases In the Denver metropolitan regio n.
B. Authority exists In the law and funds have been budgeted, appropriated, and
otherwise made available and a sufficient unencumbered balance thereof remains available for
payment.
C. Dr<COG desires to engage the Contractor for the purcl1ase of miscellaneous traffic
signal equrpment consistent with the Traffic Signal S)'s tem Improvement Program adopted May
2007 and further described in this cc-ntracl and i' .<hlbit A.
D. The Contractor agrees to comply with all re levant provisions of the contract between
ORCOG and COOT, incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this contract, as If
f111iy set forth, 1n the mon1tonng and administration of this ::ontract.
NOW THEREFORE, It 1s hereby agreed that
1 . PURCHASE OF THE EQUIPMENT
a. General Requirements. Th e Contractor shal l administer and pu rchase the
equipment as depicted In attached Exhibit A, wl1 ich 1s made a part of this
contract, In accorda nce with Tille 49, Parts 18 and 19, as appropriate , of the
Code of Federal Regulations regarding uniform administrative requirements for
state and local governments and other non-profit orgJmzatlons .
b. Submissions of Proceedings. Cootract and Other Documents The Contractor
shall submit to ORCOG an data, reports, records, contracts, and other
documents collected and developeJ by the Contractor relating to the project as
ORCOG 111ay require. The Contractor shall retain Intact, for three years following
project closoout, all conlracl documents, financia l records, and su.-porhng
documents.
A T T A C fl 1 E l
C. Award of C ~ntract This contract Is awarded lo lhe Contra ctor based upon the Contractor's proj ect apphcauon, whlci·, ..,rovides lhat the Co ntractor be responsible for all expenses associated with acqu,ring, installing, operating and maintaining the equipment, excluding the actual porchase cost of the equipment. ContraclOf agrees that ContractOf s1aff and subcontractors engaged in such will not be reimbursable as pan of this agreement. d. No DRCOG Obligations to Third Panies . DRCOG shan not be subject to any
obligations or liabilities to any person no t a party to this contract in connection
with the performance of this project pursuant to the provisions of th is contract
without Its specifi c wrillen consent. Neither the concurrence in, or approval of,
th e award or any contract or subcontract or the solicitation thereof nor any other
act performed by DRCOG under this co(ltract constitutes such consent.
2. ACCOUNTING RECORDS
a. ~-The Contractor shall estabfish and maintain as a s<113rate set of
accounts, or as an integral part of Its current accounllng sche, 1 •, accounts for
the equipment purchases to assure that funds are expended l~~, accounted for
In a manner consistent with this contract's agreements and ot ,e.:tives.
b.
C.
Fund~ Received or Made Available, The Contractor shell appropriate ly record In
the account all reimbursement payments received by It from DRCOG pursuant lo
thl•i contract.
Allowable Costs. Expenditures made by the Contractor shall be reimbursable as
allowable costs to the extent they meet all of the requirements set forth below.
Such expenditures must:
1) Be made in conformance with the desLription, budget, and all other
provisions of this contract.
2) Be necessaiy for the accomplishment of this contract, and reasonable in
the amount of goods and services provided.
3) Be actual net costs to the Contractor (i.e., price paid minus any refunds,
rebates, or other Items of value received by Contracl or that have the
effect of reducing the cost actually incurred).
d) Be incurred for equipment purchased only as described In Exhibit A, after
the date of this contract,
5) Be treated unifonmly and cons,J1ently under grnerally accepted
a<".counting principles.
6) Be In conformance with the standards for allowabihly of costs set forth in
Office of Management and Budget Circulars No . A-122 or A-87, as
appropriate, regarding cost principles f'lr nonprofit organizations and
state and loca l governments.
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
3.
d. e.
r.
Documentation of Costs. Invoices , coniracs. and/or vouchers detailing the nature or the charges shall support all equipment purchase costs charged to this contract. Checks, Orders. and Vou~~-Any check or order drawn up by the C'.ontractor with respect to any rtem wh1~.h is or will be chargeable aga inst this contract will be drawn only In accordance ~"h a properly signed voucher then on r.le in the office or the Conllactor, which wil' detall lhe purpose for which said check or
vrder 1s drawn. All checks, payrolls, Invoices, contracts, vouchers, orders, or
other accounting documents pertaining in wtiole or In part to the project shall be
clearly identified. readily accessible, and, to the extent feasible, kept separa'e,
and apart from all other such documents.
Audits and Inspections. At any lime during normal busine~s hours and as often
as DRCOG, COOT and U.S. Department of Transportation /hereinafter,
'USOOT"), and/or the Comptroller Genera l of th e United States may deem
necescary, there shall be made avaff able to DRCOG, COOT, USDOT and/or
represent atives of the Comptroller General for examination, all records with
respect lo all matters covered by this contra ct and the Conllactor will permit
DRCOG, COOT, USDOT, and/or representatives of the Comptroller Genera l to
audit, exam ine, and mak<i excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to
make audits of all contracts, Invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel .
conditions of employment and other data relating to all matters covered by this
contract.
TIME OF PERFC RMANCE
This co ntrac t shall commence upon execution and shall expire Maret, 31 , 2009.
4. COST OF EQ UIPMENT PURCHASES
The cost for eq uipment purchases in which federal funds are participating shall not
exceed $24,000 (Twenty-Four Thousand Dollars).
The Contractor agrees lo provide all lnslallat,on, operation and maintenance of the
purchased equipment at Its expense.
5. REQUEST FOR PAYMENT BY THE CONTRACTOR
a. ~-DRCOG shall re imburse the Contractor up to $24 ,000 (Twenty-Four
Thousand Dollars) for the purchase ol lraffic signal eq uipment as described In
the attached Scope of Services.
b. Payment. Payment shall lle made on the following basis: After receipt of the
equipment, the Contractor shalt submll the invoice to the ORCOG Accounti ng
Depar1ment for reimbursement. DRCOG will lneo!pOrete the Invoice Into Its next
bUI to COOT. Upon rece ipt of payment from COOT by DRCOG aoc upon
verification by DRCOG thal the Contracl or has installed the equlprtent and that
the P.q•Jipmtint is operating as intended, DRCOG will re1mburse the Contractor
lor the amount o' allowable costs ol the Contractor's 1nvo,ce. ll 1s the Contractors sole responsibthty to mslall lhe equipment and contact DRCOG lor • field verification prior to receiving re,mbursemenl 6. MANAG EMENT a. DRCOG Representahve. DRCOG has designa ted Jerry J. Luor as lls rep resentative who will coordinate reviews, approvals, and aulhom::alions ,
'J. Contractor's Representative . The Contractor has designated Ladislav Vostry as
its representative for this contract who shall be responsible for coordination and
liaison with DRCOG on the equipment purchases associated wdh this contract.
If al any lime a contractor representative is not assigned for this conlr, :t, the
Contractor shall immediately notify DRCOG and work shall be suspended unlll a
representallve has been assigned who is acceptable lo DRCOG.
c. By signing lhis agreement, lhe Contractor also represents that Its organizahon
and its principals are not suspended or debarred per Federal requirements.
7, PERSONNEL
The Cont ractor represents It will provide an d secure the personn el r equired In ln sl~lllng,
maintaining and operating the equipme nt listed in Exhibit A. All of the services required
hereunder will be performed by the Cont ractor or under its supervision, and al: personnel
engaged In lhe work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized under Stale and local •
law to per!Oflll such servir.es. Such personnel shall not be employees of or have any
contractual relabonship with DRCOG. Any subcontracts entered into by the Contractor
asSOC1aled wrth this Contract shall indude a statement that the parties lo the subcontract
understand that DRCOG Is not obligated or liable m any mannef lo the subcontractor 01
for the performance by the Contractor of its obligations under the subcontract.
8. TERMINATION
a. Fu nds not Ava il able. The parties exp ress ly recognize that the Contrac tor is to be
pa id, reimbursed or oth erwise com pensated with fed eral and/or State funds which
are ava ilable to DRCOG fo r the project, In the event that CM/AQ funds are not
made available to DRCOG per Recital A, this Agreement sha ll terminate
lmmed,atety. Contractor e~;iressl y understands and agrees that all or Its rights,
demands and claims to co.-:i:,ensalion arising undt1r lhis ~.racl are contingent
upon availability or such funda to DRCOG.
b Termination for Muti.,al Convemonce. The parties may, w,U1 the concurrence of
COOT, terminate lllls agreement ii both parties agree that the equipment purchases
specified in Exh1bil A would not prodllte benefJCiat results .
c. Termination of Contract for Cause. If through any cause, cxctud,ng force majeure,
the Contractor shall fall to fulfill ,n timely and proper manner Its obligallons under this
contract, or if the Contractor shall v,olate any of the covenants, agreements, or
st,pula tions of this contract. and has not corrected such breach within len days of
belno given notice by DR C.OG, DRCOG sha ll ther,wi::on have the righ t lo termi nate
this contract by giving wnllen notice t,, the Contractor of such termination for cause, •
whic h shall be effechve upon receipt r>f the written noti ce . In tha t even t, DRCOG
• 9.
10.
•
11 .
•
shaU nol be required lo re1m!::.irse the Contractor for any equ,pment purchases not ,et b1I ed 10 COOT, and Cowaclor sha I be obligated 10 retu ·n any payments previously received under the orov1sions of this contract. Notwithstanding the above, the Contractor shall nol be re',eved of l1ablhty to ORCOG ror any damages sustained by DRCOG by vortue of any breach of tne contract by the Contractor. d Termination for th e Conven ience of DRCOG. DRCOG may te rminate lhis contract al any time by giving wrillen ,10trcc lo the Contractor of such lerminatron, which shaU be eHectrve upon receipt of the \'mtten notice. If the contract ls terminated by DRCOG as provided herein, Iha Co ntractor shall be entitl ed lo receive compen~ation for any
equipment purchases made pnor lo the effective dale of such term1nallon, subject to
field verdicalions being completed lo the salosfachon of DRCOG.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
During the periorma nce of this contract, the Contractor agre es lo comply with all federa l
and sta le laws , rule, regulations, and orders regarding equal employment opportunity,
induding Executive Order 11256, ·Equal Employment Opportunity." as amended by
Executive Order 11375, 'Amending Executive Order 11246 Rela ting to Equal
Employme nt Opportunity," and as supplemen ted by regu lations at 4 1 CFR part 60,
•office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity,
Deparlmenl of Labor."
INTEREST OF MEMBERS OF ORCOG ANO OTHERS
No officer, member, or employe e of DR COG and no members of Its governing body, and
no other public official of the governing body of lhe locality or locaht.ies In which the
project is situated or being carri ed out Yoho exercises any functions respons 1bihties 1n
the review or ap proval of the underta king or carrying ou t of this project, sha ll parti cipate
In any decision relaUng lo this contract which aHects his personal Interest or the Interest
of any corporation. partnership, or associallon in which he is directly or 1nd1rectly
int erested or have any personal or pecuniary in terest , direct of indirect, in this co ntract or
the proceeds U13reof.
INTEREST OF THE CON TRACTOR
No officer, member, employee or agent of the Contractor or any other person who Is
authorized lo exercise any fun ction s or respcns ibilities In connection with l he
negotiating, review or approval of the undertaking or C.'.lrrying out of any segment of the
pi'ogram contemplated by this contract shall have any financial or other personal
In teres t, direct or Indirect, in this contract or any subcontract thereunder, or In any rea l 01
personal property acqu ired therefore. Any person who sha ll ln110lunlarily acquire any
such incompatible or confliclm!j personal interest shall Immediately disclose his/her
Interest lo DRCOG 1n writing. Thereafter (s)he shall not part icipate in any action
affecting the program under lhis contract unless DRCOG shall have determined that. in
light ol lhe personal interest disclosed, the partiapat,on 1n such action would nol be
contrary to the publi c Interest.
5
12. INDEMNIFICATION The Contraclor Is an 1ndependenl contractor and not an employ!>'? of DRCOG. As an independent contractor, the Contractor is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits except as may be provided by the Contractor nor to unemployment insurance benefits un less unemployment compensation coverage 1s provided by the Conlra~•or or some olher entity. The Con tractor Is obligated lo pay all applicable federa l and sl,lte income ta:.< on any moneys earned or paid pursuant to this contract relationship. Tre parti es agree lhal lhe Contractor is free from the direction and control or DRCOG except such
control as may be required by any stale or federal statute or regulation, and that
DRCOG does not require the Contractor lo work exclusively for DRCOG: does not
estabfish a quality standard for the Contract.ir; does not provide training, or does not
provide tools or benefits of performance by the Contractor except through a completion
schedule.
To the extent allowable by law, the Contractor shall indemnify, save and hold harmless
DRCOG, its officers, employees and agents. against any and al claims, damages,
liability and court award s, Including all costs, expenses, and attorney lees incurred as a
result of any negligent act or omission of the Contractor, or Its employees, agents,
subcon tractors or assignees related to this contract. Th e Contractor shall Include
la nguage similar to the forego ing In any subcontract associated with this Contract,
stating that the subcontractor agr'les lo lnder!'lnlfy, save and hold harmless DRCOG for
negligent acts or om issions of the subcontractor, Its employees, agents, subcontractors,
and assignees.
13. FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
The Contractor shall al all times during the execution of this contract striclly adhere lo,
and comply with, all applicable federal and stale laws, and their Implementing
regulations, as they currently eXJst and may hereafter be amended, which are
lncorpor, ed herein by this reference as terms and conditions of this contract. The
Contractor shall also require compliance with these stalutes and regulations in
subcontract agreements associated with this Contract.
The Contractor agrees to abide by and follow all applicable federal and stale guidelines
when expending any funds resultin g from this contract. This includes, but Is not limited
lo, the Procurement Standards set forth in Subpart C ol 0MB Circular A-11 O and the
applicable provisions of the Federa l Acquisition Regulation ('FAR'), together with any
additions or supplements U1.?reto promulgated by the Funding Agency Current
regulations can be found at 1111, ...... ..,, •net.gov/far/.
In addihon, Contractor shall 1 ,, ,
may be applicable to the proje;:t.
,:>flowing federal laws and regulalioos as
a
b.
The Copeland 'Anti-Kickback" Act (18 U.S. C. 874) as supplemented In
Department ol Labor regulahons (29 CFR Part 3)(all contracts and subgrants for
conslruchon or repair).
The Davis-Bac,>n Act (40 U.S.C. 276a to a-7) as supp lemented by Department of
Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5)(Conslructlon con tracts In excess of $2,000
awarded by grantees and subgrantees when requi red by Federal grant program
6
•
•
•
•
14.
•
15.
•
c.
d.
leg1slat1011 Th,s Acl requires thal all lal>Orers c,nd mechanics employed by contractors or sub-contractors lo work on conslrucllon projects financed by federal assistance must be paid wages not less than those established for !he locality or the project by the Secretary of Labor) Sections 103 and 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Aci (40 U.S.C 327-330) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5). (Construction contracts awarded by grantees and subgrantees in excess of $2,000, and In excess or $2,500 for other contracts which Involve the employment or mechanics or laborers).
Standards, orders, or requirements issued under sectJon 306 of the Clean Air Act
(42 U.S.C. 1857(h)). section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368),
Executive Order 11738, and Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40
CFR Part 15)(co,,tracts, subcontracts, and subgrants of amounts In excess or
$100,000).
TO THE EXl ENT ALLOWABLE BY LAW, the Contractor agrees to il':.••mnij;, save ano
hold harmless, DRCOG. its officers, employees, agents, subcontrarlors , Jnd assignees
should any applicable regu lations not be followed.
CHANGES
This contract is subject to such modifications as may be required by ri\anges In feuera·
or State lav• or their Implementing regulations. Any such required modlficallon shall
automatic. / be inCOIPOfated Into and be part of this contract on lhe effective oale of
such change as If fully set forth herein. Except as provided above, no· modification of
this contract shal l be effective unless agreed to In writing by both parties In an
amen. nent to this contract that Is properly executed and approv:id In accordance v~th
applicable law.
GENERAL
By signing this agreement, lhe Conlractor represents Iha, ,ts organizalion and Its
principals are not suspended or debarred per Federal requirements.
This contract represents the entire agreement between the Contractor and DRCOG,
replacing and superseding any previous contract. ora l or wrilten, which may have
existed between the parties relating to the matters sel forth herein.
To the extent that this contract may be executed and performance or the obfigatlons or
the parties may be accomplished within the Intent of lhe contract, the terms or thi s
contract are severable, and should any term or provision hereof be declared Invalid or
become inoperative lor any reason, such lnvaltdit~ or failure shall not affect the validity
of any other tenn or provision hereof.
The waiver of any breach of a term, provls,on. or requirement of this contract shall not
be construed or deemed as a waiver or any subsequent breach ol such term, provision,
or requlremenl, or of any other lerm, provision or requirement.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the co ntrary, the parties understand and agree that
all terms and conditions of this contract and the exhibits and attachments hereto which
may require ::on1,nued performance compli~~ce or effecl b.:yond ire 1erminat•on dale of the con1rac1 shall survive such termmahon date ~nc! shall be enforceable by ORCOG as • provided here,n In the event of suc h failure lo perform or comply by Contractor 16. CERTIFICATION FOR FEDERAL-AID CONTRACTS For conlracts lhat exceed $100,000, Contractor. by signi ng l h:: contract, certifies to the be:;t of its knowledge and belief:
a. No Federal appropnated funds have been paid or will be paid. by or on behalf of
the undersig11M, lo any person for Influencing or attempting to ln0uence an
officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or
employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connecllon
with the awarding of any Federal loan , lhe entering inlo or any cooperative
agreement, and the exlenslon, continuation, renewal, amendment, or
modificalion of any Federal contract, granl , loan. or cooperative agreement.
b. If any funrts other than Federa l appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid
lo any person for in0uencing or allempling to Influence an officer or Member of
Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with lh,s
Federal contract, gr,mt, loan. or cooperative agreement, lhe undersigned shati
comp lete and submit Standa rd Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form lo Report Lobbying,"
In accordance with ii~ ln slrucUons .
This certifica~on Is a material represenlallon of fact upon which reliance was placed
when this lransacUon was made or entered Into. Submission of this certification Is a
prerequisite for making or entering Into lhls transaction imposed by Section 1352, TIiie •
31, U.S. Code. Any person who falls lo file lhe required certification shall be subject to a
civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such faDure .
Contractor also agrees that II shall require that the language of this certlficalion be
inc luded in all lower tier subconlracls, wh ich exceed $100,000 and that all suc h
subreciplenls shall certify and disclose accordingly.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties h"l'elo have executed thrs contract on the
___ day of __________ , 2008.
By:
DENVER REGION,' '01.iNCIL
OF GOVERNM : • rs
Jennifer Schaufele
Execuhve Director
ATTEST:
By:
Roxie Rensen
Administrative Otncer
8
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
By __________ _
J ames K. Woodward, Mayor
ATTEST:
BY:-,---,-,....,....-,,---,,.......~---Loucr1sh1a A . Ellis
City Clerk •
•
•
•
EXHIBIT A ORCOG SIGNAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASE SCOPE OF SERVICES The City of Englewood will pu1chase traffic signal equipment lor its traffic signal system on Broadway. The equipment to be purchased and the localions lor deployment consist ol
Estimated
Locallon Equipment Cost
Broadway @ Quincy ond 54f0 S. TS-2 Cabinet w/ UPS
Broadway (2)
Total Estimated Cost $24 ,000
• CO UNCIL COMMUNICATION Date: Agenda Item: I Subject: April1!.W08 9c l City of Sheridan Fleel Main1enance Agreement Initiated By: Staff Source:
Depar1men 1 of Publi c Wr,rks Rick Kahm, Director
Pat White, Fleet Manager
COUNCIL GOAL AN~ PREVIOUS COUNC IL ACTION
Council strives to pron . ,le regional cooperation. With that in mmd, Council has approved tleet
maintenance agreemems "ith the City of Sheridan since 1993.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends Council approve, by Motion, an exten sion to an Intergovernmental Agreement (I GA)
wtth the City of Sheridan for vehicle maln1e nance services for 2006.
• BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
•
The City of Englewood has been se rvici ng 1he City of Sheridan's vehicles since 1993. Sheridan has
been salisfied wilh the services provided I •y the City and ls interested In continuing our working
relationship at the re\'ised hourly rate of St 8, which is the s-1me rate charged to the City of Cherry Hms
Village, Englewood Schools, and the Engle" '>Od Lions Club. The IGA allows for adjusting the hourly
rate each year.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
From 1993 through 2007, 1he Servlcen ter Garage has 1ake n on 1he add itiona l wo rkloarl C\f servicing
Sheri dan's fl eet vehicles. This has been accomplished without 1ddlng additi onal stdft. T~e hourly ra te
of $68, plus a 30% mark up on oarts, "ill cover the City's exp,-u,es for se" ices performed h Is
es1imaled tha~ m ~008. the City of Englewood \\ ill realize rl'\·enue m the amoun1 of $80,000.
UST OF ATTACHMENTS
h1ens10n 0 1 Agreement
•
•
•
EXTENSION OF AGRJ:EM ENT WHEREAS. th<, City of Englewood and City of Sheridan entered mto an ngrccnu:nt f,-r vclucle ma,ntenanoc SCl\occ m 2005; and
WHEREAS, the agrccmcnt pro,-idcs for three add1uonal one-year periods which may be
negotiated by lhc City Manager.
WHEREAS, the parties agree to extend the coolnCI from January 1, 201'8 through Occcmber
31, 2008 with the following pncc for SO'VIOCS for 200S; and
NOW, THEREFORE. the plJtics ~grce to the following extension:
The City oi Englewood shall perform all nec:tuary repain and main1enance on the
vducles owned by the City of Sheridan to the satisfaction of the City of Sheridan, and the
City of Sheridan shall pay 10 the City of Englewood for such semccs the sum of sixty•
eight dollars ($68.00) per oour, 111 addition lo lhc oost to the City of Englewood of MY
patts or outside vendor charges plus thirty percent (300/4) handling fee.
DATED: tp ~foA CITY OF SHERIDA?I. COLORADO
ATTEST: ?, ~ 7J ,Mayor
DATED: CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
ATTEST: Gary Scars, City Manager
Loucrishia A. Ellis, Cny Clerk
•
•
•
COUNCIL COMMUNI CATI ON Date : Agenda It em: Sub ject: April 2 t . 1008 11 a I Denier Sem,n.tr, Pl,11111,•d l '1111 Oe1elop111ent (PUD) Amenrirnen l 2 Initiated By: Staff Sour~:
Community Development Department Tricia L,,ngon. Se11im PIJn11er
11.ent Place Development Company I, Inc.
1430 Wynkoop Street, Suite 100
Dem er, Colorado 80102
CO UNCI L COAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
There has been no previous Council action concerning the proposed Dem er SeminJI) PUD
Amendment 2. Council appro,ed the orig,nal Dem er Seminal)• PIJD on Septembe, W. 2004 b\
Ordinance Number 52, Series of 2004 and PUD Am endm ent I on February 21 . 2007 hy
Ordinance 9, Series of 2007.
PREVIOUS PLANN ING COMMISSION ACTION
The Pla1111ing ,ind Zon ing Commission con side red Denver Seminary PUD Ammdnwnt 2 ,11 ,, Publk
Hearing conduc,cd on March 4 am' March I 8. 2008. The Commission cons11k>red 1est11non1 and
, oted 5 -2 10 forward the proposed Amendment 2 to City Council w11h the folluw111g cnndlt lom:
I. All approved conditions and requirements established under the Denier Sem,n,11) PUD ,md
Denver Seminary PUD -Amendment 1 shall ,1pply unless ,,me nded by t\111end11wnt 2,
2. Amendment 2 acknowledges the need for flexible de1elopmen1 options b\ e\t,1l~ishillR
three (3) de, elopmenl enve lopes. Techni cal site plan review or del'cl opment within ,,,Id
em elopes shall be by the Development Revie-1 Team for compliance "1th PUD ,md CII)
de1elopmen1 standards.
3. Envelope 2 shall be limited to uses permitted on the •household 111 inf t ,11e1101) of the
PUO's Table of All owed Uses.
4. Hotel Use sh,111 bP limlteJ as follow,:
a. Hotel use shall be located within Enve lope l on ly.
b. Hotel use shall not be a separate, stand-alone use.
c. The 1 ·1aximum number of hotel rooms shall be 150.
d. If hotel use Is approved, th e fo llow ing guest accommoda1 io11 allo wante app101,•d In
the original PUD shall be amendP.d 10:
"J. The number of residential units dC"es no t include proposed guest
accommodation for guests or residents of the project Such spaces shall not l'\teed
qoo S.F and no more than f\,o such spaces per cr,jdentjalcoudo1111nlull\ l\11\11 h~1ldiA8 I I J 104dll shall be pro, lded: RECOMM ENDED ACTI ON Stan recommends that Council consider 1h,s Bill for an Ordmance on firsi reading and ,ct M,t\ 111 2008 as the date ror Public Hearing to consider public testimon1 on Den, er Semin,1r1 PL 0 Amendmen1 2.
BACKGROUN D
The subject proper1y is an I 1.41 acre site al the northwest corner , f Sou1h Unh ers111• Boule, .ird
a1 d East Hampden Avenue (US 265). The sile was occupied b1• a seminary for more than 40 ye.u~.
In 2004 11 was rezoned by Council upon a requesl by IVF, LLC from R·3 ·B residenllal zoning 10
Planned Unit Development The rezoning allowed 350 for-sale residential unils and up 10 65,000
square feel of retail space.
JVF, LLC transferred the site lo Con ti nuum Partners, LLC in December 2005. During 2006
Continuum remodeled 1he former adminis tration bui lding into a sales cen1er, demolished the
rema inder of the sl1c, and completed 1he sound wall on the wesl and no rth boundaries of the
properly. Continuum redesigned lhe site to increase efficiency and miliga te infrastru clltre com In
Amendment I, which also adjusted parking rat ios and reduced allow ~d relail space 10 51,500
square feet.
AMENDM ENT 2 OVERVIEW
In the original PUD and In Amendment 1, de,elopment was restnc1ed lo specific loca1i ons as
designa1ed by th e footprint of the building.s shown on the Sile plan. The designa1ed footprint
provided no flexibility in bu1ld1ng location or orientation and could be modified only through
another PUD amendmenl
Amendment 2 proposes site plan adjustments 10 address development based on changing nwke1
cor.di11ons by establishing ·en.elopes• or designated areas in which uses and structures ma1 be
located. An em elope is a larger area 1han a buildings ac1ual foo tpnnL The en, elope concept
pro,ides the fle\ibility to make changes 10 building location and onenlation 10 meel consumer dnd
market demands wilhoul the need 10 1mend lhe PUD site plan each time an ad1us1ment ls
considered.
T'1e applicanl proposes the following PUD adjustments in Amendment ~:
Three envelopes in which an allowed use or activity may occur provided all PUD height,
setback, bulk plane, and floor area requirements are met Establishment of the envrlopc does
not mean the envelope will be comple1ely filled; only 1ha1 de, elopmenl 1Pay occur within th e
envelope area.
Addition of single and f\vo-unit residenti al use
· . ., •
•
Addi1ion o f hote l use •
In c rease In re tail/comme rcial space 10 75,000 square feet
•' •
•
•
Decru e the number oi residential units 1rom 350 to 30) Limit dormer; on structures along" est boundary ( egotiated "1th Kent Village) Coordinate bulk plane and height to each em elope In 2004 it was anticipated that the ong,nal PUD "ould generate approlClmately SJ mdhon in use tax and building permit fees O\ler its four )'ear construction phase. TI1e original PUD protected a net
S700,000 annually in additional property and sales tax re, enues tor the City's general fund. It Is
anliclpated that these figures will not change significantly because of the increase In retail space and
material costs of supplies and labor.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Staff Report (March 4, 2008)
Plann ing and Zoning Commission Minutes (March 4, 1008)
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes (M arch 18, 2008)
Planning and Zoning Commission Fin dings of Fact
Con tinuum Partners le ll er (RE: dorm er adjustments )
BIii for Ord lnanc p
•
•
{' C T y 0 F COMMU,'-IT\ E .,GLE\VOOD DE\ELOP,\\E'-T TO: PIJnnmg and Zonmg Com1•11rno11
THR U:
FROM :
DATE :
SL BJECT:
APPLICANT:
Alan Whue. Director. Communrl\ De\elc~menl
T ncia Langon. Senior Planner ........-.,
March 4, 2008 1
Ca se ZON2008-01 -Public He.1nn1s
Den,er SeminJry Planned Lllll De,elopmenl -\111~11dme111 2
Kent Pla ce Development Company I, Inc.
1430 Wynkoop S1reet, Suite 100
Denver, Colorado 80202
PROPERTY OWNERS:
Co111inuum Cherry Hills land CompJn\ LLC
Ken1 Place Investors, LLC
1430 Wynkoop Street, Suite 100
Denver, Colorado 80202
PROPERTY ADDRESS :
3-151 Soulh Unr,erslty Soule,ard
REQ UEST:
The applicant has subm,ned an application 10 amend the Demer ~emnw, Pl.1nnet! L nu
Development (PUDJ which was nrst approved b-Cm• Council on S,•µt,,ml Pr 20 200-1 as
Ordinance Number 52, Ser,es of :00-1 anJ amend.,J on Fd,ruJr\ 23 . : o-li, urchn,1n,:,:
9, Series of 200~
RECOMMENDATION:
The Departmen t of Communit',, De,elopment recommends :n.11 the Pl,1111111q ,111d Zonrng
Commission re,iew the Demer Seminary PUD Amendment 2 Jnd IOf\\JrJ J
recommendat ion fo r appro,al to City Council with the following conrl111ons
1. All approved co11c!i11ons and requiremen ts estJblished un der 1he Den,er ~.,,rnn.ir}
PUD and Denver Seminary PUD -Amendment 1 shall apply unl~ss arne•ldt>d b,
• Amendmen t 2.
I CX:O Englewood P~r~•.-,v Englc,-ood Colorado 80110 PHO,'-E JOJ,;0~-,H! H\ l~J."~J ~es;
,,.,.,...,\ e-ng!e--.. oodac.~ "'i
! -\111,mdment ~ Jclno"ledg(', 1he need r , lle,,ble de1.elopmen1 cpuons b, estJbhshmg lhree 13 de, elopme111 em elupes. Technical s11e pl.in re\lew oi • de,elop men 1 ,,11h111 sJid e n,elopes shJII be b, 1he De,elopmer11 Re,ie,, TeJm re\le•., ior comph.111ce ",th PL D ana Cit, de, elopment standards 3 Em elope ! shall be limited 10 uses permmed in the "household II\ 111g CJlego" or 1he PLD·s Table or A.llo"ed l ses. -1 . Ho 1el L se shall be lim lled JS iollo ws : a Hotel use shall be located \\llhrn structures iden1ified as Condominium To\\er l ! 3. o r .i
b. Hole! use shall nol be a separat e, stJnd-alone use
c. The maximum number oi hotel room s shall be 150.
d. If hotel use is approved, 1he follu" ing guest accommodatton allowJnce
appro,ed m the ongmal PUD shall be amended 10:
"l Th e number of residenlral units does not include pr oposed guesl
accommodation for guesls of resi den ls of 1he project. Such
spaces shall not exceed 900 SF. and no more than two such
spaces per re~jdentjal condgmmjym lower ll~rleiAg ( 12 to tall shall
be pro, ided."
LEGAL DE SC RIPTION:
lots l and 2. Kent Place First Filing
ZON E DISTRICT:
Denver Seminary Planned Uni t De,elopmenl, as Amended.
PROPERTY LOCATION AND SURRO UN DING LAND USE:
The subject prope rty of this PUD amendme nt is located al the nor1hwes1 corner of Sou1h
Universiiy Bou levard and East Hampden Avenue land to the north and west of the subject
properiy is within the Ciiy of Englewood. Adjoining land to 1he north is zoned R-1 ·A
Residential Single Dwelling Unit District and contains detached single-uni! dwellings.
Adjoining land to the .ves l is zoned MU-R -3-B Mixed -Use Residen1ial/limlted Office-Re1ail
Districl and conta ins an at1ached single-unit d\, elling developrnenl known as Kenl Village .
Land to 1he east of the Sile, across South University Boule\'ard, is within unincorporated
Arapahoe County and is zoned R-2 (County zoning designation ). land south oi the si1e is
within Cherry Hills Village and is zoned R· 1 and R-3A (Cherry Hi lls Village zoning
designalion). land within these areas coniains residentia l detached single-u ni! dwellings .
PUD AMENDMENT PROCEDURE:
As stated In Sections Elb and E1b of 1h e original Denver Seminary PUD Dislrict Plan
Developmenl S1andards, majo r modifications 10 1he Dis lrict Plan and site plan amendments
may only be made pursuanl to the same procedures under ,vhich th0 original plans were
approved. Therefore a pre-apphcaoon neighborhood meeting. Cny review and public
hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council are required.
•
•
•
•
•
BACK GROUND: The Planned Lmt De,elcpment Is a rezomng p rocess that establishes spec1iic zoning and sI1e pl.inning cruenJ to meet the needs 01 J specmc de, elopment propcsJI tha1 111.l\ not be accommo dateo \\Uhm e,Isung z:mmg de,elopment regulauons -\ PLO rezonmg pro\ldes the opportumt\ Ior unmed de•.elopment ron1rol for muluple propenIes or multiple uses. The Den1,er Seminarv PUO Is an 11.-1 I acre site previous!~ occupied by a theolog ica l seminary (or more than iort, veJrs. The site 1vas the sutject oi a rezoning application by )\ F, LLC. The rezoning was appr01ed b, Council on September 20, 200-l as Ordinance
Number 52 . Series oi ~00-l. 1.ith the ioll0\\1118 conditions'.
Dedication oi the South Lm\ersir. Boule1ard continuous right turn lane.
2. Construction or the pubhc impro,em,;nts dS proposed and as a condi tion o( the
PUD appr oval.
3. Prior to r~cording any Development Restricuons and Co, enant documents. the City
shall re,ie,1 such documents to assure that the documents are consistent with the
PUO.
-l. Applicant shall provide two recorded copies o( all Oe1,elopment Restrictions and
Covenan t documents to the City.
The property was transferred from )VF, LLC to Conunuum Partners, LLC in December 2005.
Since that time Continuum demolished all but one building on the site and constructed
sound walls on the west and north boundaries .
Contmuum Partners requested and recei'led approval of Amendment I, which allowed a
red uction in re tail area and related parking ratios, modification of buildin g configurations
and thus building envelopes, and change In turn-lane coniigura tion to mitigate intersection
conflicts identified by Colorado Depanment of Transportation (See Exhibit B).
NE IGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARY:
Pursuant to the Denver Seminary PUD amendment p rocedure, the applicant conducted a
neighborhood meet ing 011 January 16. 2008, prior to subm itting the app lica tion for
Amendment 2 on January 18, ~008. Notice o f the pre-appl ication meet ing was malled to
owners of propertv within 500 feet of the site . The notification area induded properties
within Englewood, as "ell as Cherry Hills V1lla!!e, Den,er, and umncorporated Arapahoe
County 1\leeting notes are attached to this report (See hhiblt Ct.
CllY DEPA RTM ENT ANO DIVISION REVIEW:
The Ame ndment 2 PUD District Plan and site plan were rev iewed by the City's
Development Review Team (ORT) on January 29, 2008. identified issues were addressed
by the applicant and the final Denser Semina~ PL10 Amendment 2 packet was submitted
on February 20. 2008.
OUTS IDE AGENCY CO MMENTS:
Preliminary pla ns of the proposed De nve r Seminary PUD Amendme nt 2 we re referred to
Arapahoe County, the City and County of Dem er, Cher~· Hills Village, and the Colorado
De~.1nmc·11 .,; TrJm,·1.orlJt10 11 CDOT 1or re,1c·,, J11,:! c=mment. Comment, from DemP• J r1c .\tJ;:J'l• ~ Cc~111, a,~ JttJchec as E\h1bts D JnJ E T'1e COOT prehmrn.m comm.?nts • are attach.?c as E,!irbt F F,na l COOT c.:imn,ent; based en Jn upd.ued Trame Anal,sis "ere no t reL?1~ed 111 tune to be included in thi s staii repo rt. Ii iarmal commen ts Jre rece" ed be,-,,~ 1~., public he ~rrng. StJir "ill present 1:,em dr..r.ng t:1e heJrn,; Chem Hills \ illa3e did 1101 ;,r.:i,rde com ments. ANALYSI S: l nless moduied t:uor..sh trns -\mencment ~ api;h cJtr on. JII co ndruons a11d requrrements or
the PUD as ,1mended rema in 111 eiiect.
Site Plan:
Tne applrcant is proposing site plJn amendments to address developmen t iss ues resulting
from changing marl..e t cond111ons since the original Planned Unit De, elopment \\JS
approv ed.
Building Envelope: A building envelope establishes area ano bull.. limits in whrch structural
development ma, occu r. The original PL10 and AmendmPnt I site plans designated the
foo tprint of each structure to be its development em elope. This des igna 11 011 offered no
ne~1bility in bu il ding location or orientation ar.d modification of the approved site plan
would ag;iin require a Pl'D amendment
The applicant proposes enlarge ment oi the enve lopes in which buildings and uses ma y be
located lo allow adius tments 111 burldrns locati on and orientation without the need to
amend the PLD site plan ear.n time ad1us1ments are considered. Three large envelopes are
proposed in which any all•,wed use or JCtivi ty may occup} pro, ided all PUD es tablished
height. setbac~. bulk p1Jne and noor ar ea requiremen ts are met Establishmen t 01 the
envelope does not mean the envelope ,viii be complete~ 11lled: only 1hat development may
occur with111 the envelope area. Pleas P see sheet PUD 3 of the Amendment 2 submi ttal for
details of the proposed envelopes
Envelope I Is located in the southeastern port ion of the site and co ntains two sec tions .
Envelope 1-\ is the area identifi ed in the ongmal PLU and 111 Amendmen t I as comm~rcial
space Em·elope I B rs the areJ identnied in the origi nal Pl D and 111 Am endm ent I as
contaming cor,do,r1nrurn towers I Jnd ~ \\Ith m,ixrmum height; of I 21 a11 I 150 foet
respecti,e lv
Em elope ~ is lccats-i ~long the "es tern bound,1r; and con tJm s areas identified !11 the
original Pl'D and 111 Amendment I as .; residenti,11 area for to,,nhouse, rowhouse and
internJI read·:. av cie·,elopment
•
Envek1p e 3 is located h 1:,e northeastern po rti on of the site and contains the area identified
in the original PUD a nd 111 Amendment I for de,elopment of condominium I0\\Cts 3 and 4
wrth maximum heii;hts of 163 and I i9 feet respectively . With the large env elope proposal,
Envel ope 2 is "°'' 240 feet wide which slides the potential loca tion of the proposed •
corido r,iimum to""' m En,elope 3 to rhe eJ~t.
•
•
•
Tne ;:rop e , d ,.,, >?lor ~s J! u ••J d 1 c d1er ,md e<tJbli,h ar ,>J; 111 .,hi e!, oe,e!ocmem mJ', occur .,_ 'JIil. es1Jhli,hment oi an emekpe does not meJn the "melo~e \\ill be complete !, rilled 011!, that de,elopment ma, occur \\llhlll l!le em elo pe ar eJ 111 the ongmal PLO and in ¼nendment I the l;uddlllg iootpnnt emelopes designated pre -i se budding locations and allowed no rle\lb1lir. ,,uhout amendme111 oi the PLO site plan . PL'D sue plan can onh be amended through the same pr:icedure as the ori,linal Planned Lnu Oe,elopment a minimum five month process. me enl.irged envelope concept pro\ldes fle,ibilir-. and all o,, s development to adjust more quick!} to changmg marlet
demands
When economic downturns or other market forces are be} ond th 0 control or a developer ,
grea ter zoning ne~1bl} can be used to support redevelopment. Establishing de, elopmenr
envelopes in a PUD rather than requirmg a de tailed sue plan cJn provide de\elopmeni
opportunity and creativi ty. Though the rigid locational detai ls are not imposed in an
envelo pe, the PUD's overall con trols are mon itored through the Distric t Plan's
develo pmen t standards for he ight. bulk, setbacks and uses . All zone distric ts in the City
fu nc tion 0 11 th is same stand ard; one whe re deve lopm ent can respo nd to the marke t wi thi n
the cont e~, of app roved zon ing regu lations. Once zoning regula tion s ar e estJb llshed in the
Dis tric t Plan and emelopes are crea ted on an Envelope Plan, th e de rails of the
deve lopme nt should be reviewed fo r com pl iJnce with Ci ty and PUD deve lopment
standa rds by the Developmen t Review Team .
Permi tt ed Uses :
The following additicns to the Tabl e of Allowed Uses are proposed .
One-uni! deuched dwelling and two-unit dwelling: m e residential uses pro\ide
additional nex·biliry for individual homes and two-uni t structures .
Hotel: Addit•on of hotel use allows the option for guest accommodations on sire .
The following amendments are proposed for e~isting allowed uses :
Increase In the ma~imum commercial floor area (retail and ofnce space ) from
51,500 to i5,000 square feel.
odification to the number of parking spaces associated \,1th the change in uses .
As rroposed, an} use allowed in the PUD ma, locate mthm an~ en\elope In the original
PUD and in mendment 1 the ,,estern portion of the de,el opment "as d~signated for
lower dens i · resident ial use . mis area is proposed as En elope:! Because this area \\as
designated and appro, ed for res idences with lower heigh t and bulk standard~. hotel use
may not be an appropriate use In this en,elope. T'lerefore Community De\elopment
DepJrtment recommends that Emelope :! be limited to allowed uses permitted fn the
"household li\ing• category or the PUD 's Table of Allowed Uses .
As proposed, Ho tel use Is not included in the calcul ation or totJf commercial space. Hotel
use is proposed to coun t toward the tot,11 number of re ;ide nt ia l units at 3 ra tio of I ho tel
room equa ls S residen tia l units. Al this rat io, 600 ho tel rooms cou ld be buil t if no fo r-sa le
residential units Jre constructed . I his scer1ario o r anythi ng app roJching it, howe\er unlikely,
could drJrnJltcJII, ch Jn ~., 1· -e c ,.ir.Kter ci th" site fne•e1ore Commumt\ De,elopment • Department recomm e nd, trJt 1ne lllilo" 111g hotel u;e cond1110 11s be added to the PL D Districl Plan Oe,elopme nt StJndJrJs Hotel use ;hall be .ocJ:ed .,11h111 Condominium To"~r I,~ 3. or ~ Ho tel use shall not be a separJte. s1.rnd-al, ne use The maximum number of hote l rooms shall be 130. Ii hotel use is appro,ec 1he iollo\\111g guest accommodJ1ton allowance appro,'!d ,n the original PL D shall be amend':!d 10:
3. The nurnber oi reslde 111ial un11s does not include proprised gues t
accommodation for guests of residents of the project. Such
spaces shall ~ot e"eed 900 S.F. and no more than two such
spa-es per residential condomirnum tower btH ldiAg ( 12 lelal ' shall
be presided.
Residential Density: The propos0 d ma~1mum number of residential ulllls is proposed to be
reduced from 350 to 300 units. This reduces the residential density from 30.67 units per
acre 10 :6.3 units per acre; howeve r it does not include hote l occupancy.
Phasi ng: The development is ~nticipated to be done in phases with completion of the
project by the end oi JOI:.
Setbacks; A setback is the minimum distance a str ~ ·1ure must be located from a property
line. For this proposal, setback is the minimum distance from the property line 10 the
buildin~ envelope.
Directio n Enve looe # Cu rren t Setback Prooosed Setb ack
North 2 33' 2· 25' 10·
3 26 ' 2" 37' 6"
Sou th 1A 6' 2" unchanRed
2 19' 3" 2' 7"
East IA 13 ' 2" unchan~ed
3 I 20 I RJn~e: 14' 10 lO' ,•
West 2 20' unchanRed
Building Height and Bulk Plane: All building heights in Amendment 2 are bJsed on United
Stales Geological Sur.ey (U SGSJ ele\.J tions and measured fr om grade. Unless specified,
building he1gh1 is inclusi,e and all poruons of the building and ill projections must be
contained within the staled he ight hmit. The ma~imum building height at any given point is
a function of bulk plane standJrds. Bulk plane creates "s tepped" height increments
"hereby upper floors are set back forther from the property lme than lower floors. This
reduction in a slructu, ;'s o, er all bulk allows access lo sk~ hght within the de, elopment and
reduces shadows on adjacent properties. Max im um he ight and bulk plane "steps" are
6
•
•
•
•
•
sho•,1 n on sheel PL D-3. Cross sec:1011s 1ll~iirJ1111g he1gh1 and bu!~ p!J ne oi the proposed e111 elopes Jre sho"n on snee t PL'D·4 -\ summar\ oi proposed he,ght and bulk p!Jne modi!kauons 1s shown belo": Envelope ;t
1-\ lbldR 1
1,.1, tbldgs. l IS. J I
1B !lower I
1 B 110.,er 2
2 ftO\\nhousel
2 rro"house l
3 !tower J
3 (tcw,r -I ~fo" er
oortlon l
3 (lower 4-upper
cort1on l
I
Curren t Individual Buildings Heieht
43 ' ,. r
11 I'
130'
46'
4-1'
163'
155'
179'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Proposed E~VCLOPE Heigh t
43'
-15'
12 1'
150'
55'
53•
1i9'
179'
1 i9'
Current Bulk Plane Steps
I 43'
43
11 1'
I 150'
I 11 ·129' -16'
4-1'
163'
1 133'
1 179'
Proposed BULK PLANE Steps
-15 '
I -15
121'
150'
21 'J -1 6'/55'
55 '
20'/1 i9'
20'/179'
20'/179'
A numerical error appears in tfie Envelope 3 diagram on sheet PUO--1. The lower bulk
plane step should read "5-131 (LSGS)". This error is noted and will be corrected .
Parking: In the original PUD and in Amendment 1, the number of parking spaces was
specified. Amendment 2 proposes the same parking rauo for reta.il use ( 4 spaces per
1,000 square feet ) and the sJme residential ra110 (2 spaces pe r unit). Bicycle parking ra ti o
also remains unchanged. The pa rking ratio for hote l use is proposed at .5 spaces per room.
The current City parking s1and,1rd for hotel use is 1 space per room, plus employee park ing
at .5 spaces per employee. Additional parking is required if the hotel has convention or
m~eting faciliues .
The ,ictual number oi parking spaces necessary for the project is dependent on the uses
and actual development. It is the developer's responsibility to provide parking at the
established ratio~ 11he11 the site plan and uses drt! established.
Shadow : Because th e envelope concepl does not require building locations the exact
shadow efiec. 1111! not be determined unul the iinal building design and location •s
determined. Proposed building heigh t modifica tions in El1'elope 1 create shado.v onlv
\,1~1in the PL D site. The applicant ,,ill presP.nt a shado11 udy ammahon at the public
hearing.
In .Omendment 1 t~e tO\>nhouse envelope along the west bound,1ry was 46 feet in height
and 33 feet fr om the north property line. Ame ndment 2 proposes a three step bulk plane
with heights at 21, 46 and 55 ieet. These height s are appr oximately 26, 60 a nd 88 feet
from th e north propertv line.
In -\ma>n cimen t 1 t·.10 condor.1imu r 10·.,er e'l1 e!cpes en the north poruon or l:le s,te \\ere Jp oro1ad JI h ,5hts oi 103 Jnd 1-9 i-"et. The .<' en,elopes ,ere a-.,; ieet from the north • pr, pert·, lt,1e. l11 Ame11<.:111i,1•1: J 1.10 ti,µ Lui~ plJ11e •~ propo ed '"th the IU11er te p berng J mJ ,mu m oi ~·J iee tJ II Jt J dis tance oi r 5 ieet irom the north prcpert1 hne Tne taller ,t~p is , -,J ie~t rn 'le1gh1 an d remJr,i ;. JI a-.:; ieel irom t'l e north proper!\ lrne . Due to the v1denmg or En1e:opt' 2 En1eloi:e 3 shim to t,e eJst \ .ith tlie emelcpe snm and 1-1 re!!l he,ght u creJse II a~~eJr; thal IJte da, shadc"s mJ, be dee;;er Jnd e tend iurther to the eJsl
Tr:ifric : Amendm,mt 1 propcses no changes to the sne's access entl') points The project
,ill meet all StJte. Cot, and Count\ d,;,dopment requirement,.
Traffic could be affected b} usrns the proposed de,elopment en1elope concep t and th e
proposed land use mod111cat1 ons, residential untl decrease, comme rcial space Increase ). A;
part of Amendment 1, the applicant submitted an updated tra fr1 c anal ysis by Fo~ Higg,ns
Transp ortarion Group , LLC. The an.ilysis summarizes the eiiects on traffic as :
"The proposed ch,inges 111 land use results in minor chJnges (some red ucti o ns an d
some Increases) in project ed site trairk for site ac cess and adja cen t int e rs ec ti on
mo ve ments .
The decrease in res ide nr ial d11elling units results in a small reduct ion of A,\I
ou tbo und site tr ips .
The proposed Increase in office use results in an mcrease in AM inb ound site tr ips,
these increases occu r durlns the periods of lowest site traffic can be ac co mmodated
with minima l effects on in tersechon level of set1ice and queuing.
Depending upon the ratio oi oi1ke ,s. rerail used , the curren t land use plan may
result in a slight decre,ue or increase in PM trips (bo th inbound and outbound );
these changes CJn be accommodated 1·,iti, minimal efiects on intersecbon level of
set1ice and queuing .
The changes ha,e no eirect on the recommendations made in the onginal tr aiuc
stud or In the fol!o\1-up addendum wid1 regards to capac ity and queuing in and
around the site."
The Fo Higgins study concluded thar "the proposed change in land use results rn a
negligibl~ net effect on sa ~ tra r:,c impact; Tne findings and reeommendabons oi the
ori3i11al :;.•,ir e are s1111 ,al,J · r th,, pro1ei:t: The Cit v TrJitk Engineer re,ie wed the! report
and determ .ri ed that the proposed changes ,n land use result m minor net efiect on srte
tra fric impacts and ~ findings a'ld reccmmendJt 1on s of the origrnal traffi c stu dy and the
follO\,-up addendum are still I aliJ ior this project.
Drainage: Dr.iinage and grading concep ts rem.im as appro,ed in Amendmen t I
LJ ndscapin": l'\o lan dscapins am endmen ts ar e proposed.
Fe,,cin g and Signage · r--.o f~11ci11g or sig nJge am endment; are pro 1>ose d.
•
•
•
•
•
SUMMARY: Communm De\ elopment ·::els thJI ahhough muluple arnendmen1s are proposed, each iine-1unt!S the origina l and Jrnended PL D plans and therefore ,1.rnendment 1 aliords an 1mpr0\ ed development. The en, elope concept 1s similar to zone distncts in the rest oi the City \vhere de\elopment is JIIO\\ed to proceed provided it meets district standards, Once PUD dist ric t plan standJrds are appro\ed, requiring an o"ner to amend the zoning for site plan or market condinon c~anges 1s ume consuming. costly and sti~es de, elopment and creativitv 111 the Cit\. Em elopes encourage a wider range of de1,elopment op tions within the context of appro\ed PLO regula tions.
The original Denver Semmar. Staff Repo rt stated th e goals or a PUD "should be to ens ure a
development that mitigates issues, integrates effectively, and establishes a new standard for
future development in the Cir.." The proposed changes or Amendmen t 2 accomplish these
same goa ls.
PLANNED UN IT DMLOPMENT CONSID ERATI ONS:
Ame nd ments to the Denver Seminary Planned Unit Development a re addressed under the
same procedure as the original PUD application. Therefore the Commission must
deter mine if the modifica tions proposed in Amendment 2 mee t Dis trict Pl an and Si te Pla n
c riteria as es tabl ished in the PUD Ordinance. Cons ideration at this time is made only to the
modifications addressed in Amendment 2
PUD District Plan
The District Plan sets forth the zcning regulations under which the proposed amendments
will occu r.
I. The PUD Dis[fiCt Plan "• c· is no~ in conformance with the Disrria Plan requirement; and
the Comprehensive Pl,;in.
Amendment 2 is in conformance with Disuict Plan requirement; and does no t alte r
the Comprehens've Plan objectives fo r housing. cultu ral arts and business and
employment identified in the original PUD.
2. All required d,xumenu. drawings, referrals, recommenddcions, and approvals have been
recei~ed.
All appropriate documents concerning Amendment 2, to this point have been
received. As the pro1ec1 proceeds, all future documents and dmvings shall be
reviewed for City developmen: standa rds by the Development Review Team,
3 The PUD District Plan is cons,;tenl with adopted and general/) accept~d st.ardards of
development in the City of Englewood,
The Amendment 2 D:strict Plan remains consistent with accepted development
stJnda rds es tablished b, the City or Englewood.
9
4 Tli,• PL D D,,1, ti P'.m 1, ,ub,1,mr..1//1 ron-1,1,•n, 11 ,1h th<! go..11,. ob1,'fl11 •''· c/,•,,gn • . ~u:iJ,,1,n<!,, pu/11 ·,·, .1m/ .1m o,h,.., 01,/m,1n, '-'· l,111 or 1<'Q<11TC'nk't11 oi 1he C11;· -\m('ndmenl 1 co111orms 10 JII olher o,dinances, la" sand requi,,,ments 01 1hc Ci11 \\'h,>n th<! PL D D1,11n1 Pl,m ,, 111thm th,• Englt><>CJod Donntm,n Dt>1t•lopmenr .\ulhll11t} 1EDD-\1 ,lft>J thl' Pl.,n ,, com1>1,•nt 1111h thi' EDD-\ approve.I de>1gn, /Ioli< ie, ,mt/ pl.in, ,01 apphc,,ble.
pt D Site Plan
The Site Plan sels iorth lhe sile plJ1111ing and design par.imeters under 11hich 1he proposeJ
amendments w,11 occur.
I. The PUD SIie Plan is, or is not, m conformance ~, ith the Distnct Plan requ11emenb.
Ame 11dme 11t 1 Bulk Plane Enve lopes establish the areas i1· "hich development m,11
occur and are in conform,rnce w11h the Districl Pian.
1 All required documenrs, drawmgs, referrals, recommendations, and approvals have been
receivecl.
All requi red silP pl,1n ma1erials, based on th e proposed deve lopme nt envelope •
concep1 have been received. As the projecl proceeds, all fu1ure site planning
documen1s and drawings shall be reviewed for Citv development standards by the
Development Review Team.
J The P:JD Sile Pl.in ,s consistent wit.i adapted ,ind generally ,iccrpt;,>c/ st,111dard; of
development of 1he C,ry of Englewood.
Amendmenl 2 is consis1e111 1V1th de, elopment standards set forth in 1he D1stric1 Plan
All development thal occurs wilhin the en• elopes shall conlorm to accepted
Englewood de, elopment standards .
./ Thr PUD S/1r P/,m,, <ulM,inr1,1/~ conmt,•nt 1111h thr go.1/s. ohwc11w, .me/ policies Jnd or
.,ni Olht>r ordm,1nn• 1.m ,., Tt'f/Ulll'mPnr or rhP Ct1y
The proposrJ PUD Silt! Pl,111 presented 111 Amendmenl 1 is m su1.>s1.1nt1.1I
conformance w11h JII olher orcl ,nances. laws and requirements oi 1he Cily.
ATTACHMF.NTS:
E<hibi l A: Denver Seminar, PUD Amendmenl ~
E,h1h11 B: Denver Se111111,11j PUD Amendment t • s,1e Plan
Exh1b11 C: Neighborhood Meeung Summary -fanuary 1 &. 2008
E,h1 b11 D: Ci ty and COlmly of De111 er -Email d,1ted Janu ary JO. 2008
E,h1b,1 E: Arap,1hoe County IE11»111e~r in g) com111ents dated February 4, 2008
£<111b11 f: COOT Region 6 -l ~lier cl,11t'd l,111 II JrV 3 1, 2008
10
•
•
•
•
ClTY OF £~CL[\\ 000 CO\L\lL \1T\' 0£\ tLOP\I E.'T DEP \IIT\1£'-T IOM C.C....._. P:1r\1q, f..oit!t""llfl4. CO SHI 10 '"'111::.!J.&:/F\,'( :'IJ-&8~ ·••A111 ............ .f"I L.> .. ,o 0E\"ELO~f£.\T APrLIC.\TION FOR~I
L.1 a:44:1. Kr::aP'aac osElmt CN!1\ •{ \rn:C:s Sea •(r ':iad?
~1tK:l~11c,htt1 ,f ncr.cuayJ """""" ________ ., _______ _
Mochfii:-111011 ?1 P'~nd tnu Oc\t.lopmc111.U~minmr-iu~~ Ut.J forrr~I
Du~PIJl'l~a.tt1c ~"'),!CG -.. 1,...,..a...;.,-,,...._ "'"""°"-.,, ....... -;.
Sabcb"t1• 1-! Prcl~ \t,p LJ Fml Pia
VX-100n o(r_J EaMmcru LI R1pt-o(,wiy
~lt~MllJ1t.Ptttn11(or ____________ _
,l.PPLJCA.'11' INFOlt\t.\TION
"""" Fnr. IC.c:i P"aa Pcck!mrn C,,mun\j I ltk.
Addre:sJ ' l-'1 nwwone.Sm1 Sunc un Pmm CO ,n::o;
P»oc'Fult.·M.ul 1!ie'l))4"'1..tr~ '4W ''"l:l'!Ut/\tW!t'S?HePP!k m
A~itectJ Plarudn& Con1ut1..1,u lnfonnadoa
C@nt¥;1hnoa:-i'anw ~Pt!""'lA':'Em:~'lll"'!!-"---------------
F..-.: Pf,,,, QwcJI Iro1 "Plfrt'.i
Addres1. M:O LPIH '""" Psnm CplQQdo w,;4p
P!Mmdfu.SW!lberr'E•ag.d. t l?))11 1.Jt'tPftl W11 ·1i.&.◄J!yt'cr::na•:tt.1i""ffl
En&lnNM I Con1ul t.ant Wonut&on
~'1n0AN.ltl"II -'IJl~~COIU"""wli!"ID'-J-:l,-IIS _____________ _
-~---""l'.,.l.:,Wc.C.,•,,.1r .... .,.,,"'''"'"y,.,.,.s,,.11,,.,1e ... ,oo-o..,.n..,, .. u .. r ... o"''!WH:w:,-_____ _
Pboacifu.lE-mll _ _.(~'"l}'-1 •~••-•~•-••~'""1~"~"'~·"-'=l~'--~a~•~--~a•,-awar~11._ ___ _
PROPERTY O\YS!.R L"10RMAT10N: L111Lt1ll»1111 nl.idJnual_..l llffl"lll.nl~1t1,.:bo!loW
111 ltkfC:tl iachr: bm.MI ~ .,..-) '"4ldn •o-m.mf\.pa-,,. lltua...llDltt.llDWtn.tJN«a el'2\oL
.. F.cor,ont: ... flffl•~ ~~llltdi/llltf!f\Mr}
h1di•Ww.lJhJ
~----:.._=::::=--::=::::=::::=::::=::::=::::=::::=::_-=::::::::::::_~-:..-:..-:..:.=-:..:.=-:..:.=-:..:.=-:..:.=-:..-=-=-:..:.=-:..-=-=--:...=
Cnrpontktn/P1rtn,nhip
?-l&mL of CixpontJatvPltVlfflb;ip C :nm1wrn Qrn: Htlh Yrd S:•'!!"Pll" LLC
AddRwtiryJS~q, t.l!J w;n Sttrn Swnc 1!!1 0t:,,n CO NlW
Su1cc orRe11itnuan
N~motOffitcr\J?)rtr.ffl \!;rkO FJF'!'S PanadJ Ycflv
IP\euc -.itau "'1lio 'fide )U&t£ft T.UC M:w1er
w,11 be J1tninc "'"Y :IIJri:t:mc.nn 1r t1r1:mM)'I
Q I TtnC4TIO!'tl latlU)'~dla,111flcX•llm,\Mll,1edft .Mldbthd,.MI ~rom.11M1tuppl1cd •ffhlt,J
applialllOfl II INC Md ~...lliMI tr,d Ul:at .:onwnt olth)1C ~' lt1ted .ahuvt. •1~ .. how. COMtll( !Jlc ft~
~CINIOlll'll>l\dlykaccomph,lbd ll.Mko,,...._ ~ ,11cm,y~ .. arcir,ot
lc~d• ... l"°'J~1M~ .. W " ,.~,-~•«:111:
:SAn'llEOFAPrLICA.'• -D•Tl ,/,[/.f Fi
rOIOfTICll3tOfl,1.Y C.......,._ __ ,_. ----0. ,_ __ ~,, ____ ._.........., __ c.,cllllntllHt-,_
.. GAOl.,,.,_,.,_.,o,.,'ol}L.-.:i.t,..,._ ~.-. ~··..,
•
•
•
T :1c1a L:me cn. Senior Pl:ume: Communi1; De, elopmenl
Cu, of Enelewood
1000 En11l;wood P:irh• ·,
Englew~. CO 8011 0-~h
Re: Kent Pla ct Develupm t nt -PCD Umendm ent I to Am endm ent 1) Summary
Dc:irTricia:
Per your request 11'.e follo wing is a summ:iry and list of the changes made as part of lhe proposed
PL'D Amendment 2. Also listed are the modification, and clarifications made subsequent to the
origin al submissio n. other than I.hose requested on the attached City comments.
A, a result of the striuness of the original PCD Site Plan with exact buiiding footprints and
roadways locations, any modifications to the bui lding locations within the overall site en velopes
requi re a full Pl:D amendment. After discussions with Planning St~ff, Community De velop ment
ar.d the City M.1nager u was detenmined that the PCD. :is a zoning documem, should establish
the permiued wes and building envelopes wilhin which to develop. The site plan . roadway and
uuhty plan, nn<! building plans should be reviewed and approved seoarately against ~ie PL-0
when e,act building locat:ons :ire k.iown. For that r::ison ,.e made the following modifications
to the PCD:
I. Sheet PCD-1: Modified lhe Construction S.:hedule and Oe,·el opmem Sumr.my to reflec:
current projected program ph:ising and deh.-ery.
2 Sheet PliD-1 · Added "One-uni1 Detached Dwelllll~·-and ·'Two-unit Dwelhn2·· as
pcnniued uses to G!low for proJected duple, d~velopmem with a pou!ntiJI of ~inim3l
single dmched uni1,.
3 Shm PlJD-1 Added "H ot~l" :is permn:~d use
4 Sheet Pl..-0-1. Add ed "Se: note DJ" to Hotel u.,e in the Table of allowable u,e,
5. Shee1 Pl:O-1 . D.2 -Correc1 :on. changed ,outh to no nh
6. Sheet PUD-1 : DJ -Reduced Residential l:nil; from 350 to 300
7. Sheet PUD-1 : DJ -Added "Ho tel : I Room = .5 Cniu )
8. Shee t PUD-1 · 0 .-1 -Increased Commercial sf from 51.500 to 75.000
9. Sheet PUD-1: 0. 4-lncreased nllowable Office sf from 17.000 to 27,000
I 0. Shee t PUO-1: D.2 through 0 .8 -Re vised sheet refrrences per sheet numbering change1
11. Sheet PUD-1: AgencyContJCI List-Changed the contJCt fo r David Owen Tryba
Architects to be Jeremy Bicker
I ?. Shm PUD-1 : Si te Dato• Modified Site Data per the nhove
• 13 Sheet.I Pl"D-1 through Pt.:D-11 EhmmJ1ed ;i1e pl:in specific Ph:i.,:ng Pl:in. Site Plan. • Off-me l'uln~ Pl3n. On-silc l'tilny Pl:in. Grading Plln. P3rkmg Plan. Gang~ Parking Plan. Pedem1an C1rculauon Plan. Landscape Plan. :ind Fencing Plan. Replaced wnh SEW Pl'D-1 Pro1ect Guidelines. Pl'D-3 Proposed Enve lope Plan . :ind Pl.!D~ Bulk Plane Section, Sptt1fic requirement> of former plJns "ill be rc,,e"ed scpamcly from lhc Pl'D JS de,.:nbed above 14 Shee1 Pt.:D-3: Sote 4 • Corr::..1100: chJnged south to nor.Ji
PleJSe lei me bo" 1f you need Jny addmonal information.
Enclosures •
•
--'---'-·c...=-... -•· i:...:
_i{]]
I', \ --
. ',-.. -. •:-• -.
-• :.. ·-• -t
...
·-.
,· -.
··-1•: .
···-. .-~-
-=,-,--___;c_:
, -Nt•.J ·: :_:• :! . , :::t?J•~~J•jl ~
111;t .-··~
~~ ... r-, iT
···~·----N~~--
'Pd'~2t· :
i:;t-··; --·· ....
~ =-;
• ~ • -• •• o:--:· 'f"'i."'•'. r .... ,. .::.k.' ,.: 1.,, ... •.i~-• •-rt~•• N -'~':: I MC 1% • "'•~••"'='"'• r.t
.-=. .. ·,-~:-: .. ~ ~• ~~~~ .'-( :t :!. If •~•• , ,.q-I.,,,~ ;: ~:;-;:.r: r::~ ·.;1 .... --:.: "."...:·t:--~_::~ · r.•;.::·~ y ·" .. , .... ,,.,,• . .,., :•.
· i~{-~-:'..:,1-ti:t-.~i~:~!j~~j~i~/r:~~~~!:.-:t?~~s~~? .•:~~~-
: .,,.,.; ,u•.;-•,,.;".:·!·• .... ;,_, .. ·:t:c ~.
1 _..,~ ll: • ;. MJ, ·u; 1:...,.:t lh.<1:. ♦ .., t•a ,t·..._
1 .. ::1 otC •• .t ;n s•-u:1:1r. ~~I 'f« ... ,..., • ~t"•t , -~··:~"~'A-·.,;,.•..:~'.:~-~"'.;:·~.!-;~•,,".~~. ~ t.--1~·;,,.
·-•JC ··~•·> ... : ~.f: ::.-! "'? .. ~-,,.,.!, ... ,.._ ... •t•· "1,,.•:I: ,·c:::• .. ... .. _ ... ,
"'':-:-,..,_., _ _.•c,.. .. s.;•n ~ ~a~• •··•~..:---•:0 •-0.•:..:r..•,-,
,, .... _, • --'II~--::..! •1...:Z:'t: Jt. •. ..c:.• -> ~ • ..... ____ -\,.~.,~
)'I ....... "f"'f""'' ::-c-·:,,.1 ""C-.:-a-:--..:~••.·• ... toe:-:-:-!">'!
•• A' -........-: -: , ~ "' -1.1 .,_ "' , .. , •l •:_:,,, • -.... •:.~ ..... , ,---e •..: :-!--:·• .... "'C ...... ..Jot. •;(t:,, •• :·:~J:~=-:~:.~·:E.~~f:3':.-:~~•t:: :-.S~~~ ,=-·. ~ ~-~i;.;-,• .. :~::, ..... -o lit-;, ... • I(;""' , ••• 2 ::,,,,,;.
?i.1 ·.~·.:,4:.c,.:.:~.::t:•,:.~r:1..;,t-:;~.;~ .·;;.#..~.'~:•:.~~;; .. :' ··""-: . :.~·;tr •ot "I:;,., .. ~,,. -e-s,,..:-~•'lot •~t .... t~'t ot'l :.,a,.;.~ .... •
-•"t ·-
t~f t{!}Jt?t~:~:::
1 M:··;-r: .. ~="."'!-~~,. .:~r--;, .. ~~:'"',, '.,;·,;,::,.~;;,:::.~
t .... ~ ;"..,;~;~~-.;-; ~-!,.:.·:! .. ~"":;• •.• •. _'\ ~
. ..;c-~·!'.,! t 5' ·-'.r "!, .. .;: ... · ...... .--;.,c. -4.••..t ,. ,, •• ---t: •
I I :!Iii~t•')l<-C ..... ,.,-'!I::._• :0:: ~ •C HI: ,-C. :t:.;\,it:, ~
, , 't:,:~g,, ~ ·-t ••·~ J r -:·•!:·••••-..1 .-.: . ,_..~ "~;· ·c .-.-a•.:(• ,ac, .;,o ""'4t• '11' ~-~ .. ..:. '"" .. r -.~:· ,o ~
,: l~◄~i,f,;~~~.--t..-~1~\;:ru•:•\~;:~~ • ~:.:t:_'ij =:..~ ;;:
:!i~:~•:~~~:~'i::~t=~=•••';/ :"' .. r;,.:,L :~,.~i -~
c:~~~L Nr-:5 ~,.~•:: -.....r •. .._ • ·-•:--.. l °" _._ -• ~ . -~,~.:=·--\ ............... '-c .. • :111 ~ .. -... !•."" .. : ?Jf f f(t~f~I:r~:/;~f?~'~:~~ ::·.c
• ""'•"' .•· • ,r •-• -,., •• ,., • "'.~~ _,• •n ~• ... "' .,c:•:-1~•~: .. ::-· -, , , , ,.• •, -,~ ,._. ~ ., ;.: ,..,
• ••;•~I 'f • lo ) "I ~ oJ "'.t: •~· ~ ~• lfo-... t, " o, 1.,.,, •·,. 'if f j,j~1i}<!{~(f,
l•,: ,. -, ,... ,... " ..,._ "" '!IP·•• ~ •
:;i)?!I{~ l'.~t,t
• .. ::'".' ., -t'-'I .....
I -■~••• •• ,.--.., . . ..-ff,., .. • • • • ~ • > . ~ ~ ..... ,, .
.;"w(-; p;•-··· .. • ··-
..~,1 •. .• ••• • I
"·' • , .... , .••. ,r ,, :.-
-~i~ !,'£:/': .. ;;~:!.: ~: ' ·-. ' . *(, ••
!i"'!:''lt '"V .. ""'N•:,"'-
:..:..=w.,
'=--..... . . -
l.
z
z
..~.--•-. u--I,__ __ ..., __ .. ,, , ... ,.,., .....
"· ... I /; ..... , ..... •··
= f _:-; .:.. ••. . .,. , ---. . , ... ,,. I
'-----..... ·" -~,·· ... .. ...c ;t:t:t:,::i.::= -~;-·: -
't'•· ., ~ •lft , • .;· • .;
•• ~ ! ·••. rt
., .... , .;...,,ti -...J:•
·:-•• .;..i,,;t
,:, •• ·" ~•...t .·.;·
. •: , ...... ~· :
't'--" ·-· ,. ,:, ... , .. ·:
,, •• _ ·•.;:c ,,:;·, .... ;:·
,....;: t-'t ~ .. V'•:t .:u.:~ ... ,.! .......... ;r ....... -.;~;->! . ·..: "'~,
~.\0 Yf~l l e-/;1 1 "'i:-3·~ c:,,..-..i
•t•· ·-•~t 1111• "· <ot :: ... •-~ ......... :.(.
... , ;I ::..~•ct
~'.P .!~?? .. ~-l:i ::~~ ;~":_i~'-·" ....... _ .. ;,(!:,rt,-:.·.--• ...
•:•• s,~;.tC )lll't,•.-• .. • ,: ..... ~~~• ....
0: 8'■;1:,::: :;,,Mo::: '1.t,-c.•.•
I ••t •-;-•:.it~,:_;,..,.., '·"'
: f ::.::~~!~?~ .-,.s_,1,
•)• h r.1,C l>•:: ~ .. :.:. ,..,
... t' ... 1· ~~ i-•
.• .··i.:i• ,• ::::: ;;! 1:
5'Ct·•~,=c-s ~-.c ,,:,i c,.-,...,..11 ~ft• ---1 ..,.a,::~•-.• _;
..... : •Jt! ,::...., :("I,-,[ ;.:atP•••• _.;
i-• r,,~,---
, •• , .• -•:"t ;,..r.,-.J ___ _
'•' r,..,..: •l•.-_.,;-., --~. '~•• ·•• Ai 4,( ""'f--~••
, __ .; ;.__J ---·----~---
----..... ~. .... ·-~~ .... ., -~
~.-------;,r--.,;"t:
,,_.._...., • ~4 • .,4! I,•'"••-·•• .,, __ . ·-· -------
'!..:•• ,..,e at::,t~t-1 S :;: l
:: •• !, .:;_•--~: .... .:·, ··--......... , __ _
•··'--·-
l (1'11,0.►1••--I '"'"--•••'"'" •--
----... -----·-,., .. r:.,.,-,::7
E\HI IJIT IJ
•
•
•
Neighborhood \.lee ting Proposed Planned Unit Oe,elopment Amendment Denver Seminarv Planned L.:ni t Oe,elopment S<Jb1ect S,1e 3-165 South Lm,ers,r. Court Aoplicant. Continuum Partners. LLC
,eiqhborhood 1.1e~t1Qg;
E'<HIOIT C
A pre-application meeung was 1-eld on January 16, 2008 at 630 pm in the Clt),Center
Community Room. As required by Planned Ln it Development PLO ) regulat ions, property
owners within a 500 feet radius of the site of the proposed PLO amendment "'ere nonried
by ma il (See attached le tter dated September 29, 2006 ,.
Attendees .
Pub lic:
Continuum Partners, LLC
Da,id Owen Tryba Architects
MB Consulting
City ci Eng!ewood
Introduction 1\-\.ek™
See attached sign-in sheets
Tom Gougeon, Principal
Kevin Fo ltz . Development Director
Jim Hatma n
Rob Straka, Senior Project Manager
Shawn Dressel, Project Administrator
Justine Willman
Dean Foreman
Jeremy Bie~er
Da,id Cer.ter, Ci,il Engineer
Tricia Lang:m, Senior Planner
t-.evin Foltz welcomed those in attendance and introduced members of the project team.
Mr. Foltz stated that the purpose of the proposed ame ndments 1,as a change from the
restricted PUD to an •enveloped based" development. o\lr. Foltz used a PowerPoint
presentation to describe the development concepts oi the proposed amendment s
Presentation
The original PUD contained 6 towers with 4.5 townhomes and 65,000 square feet of retJ1I
space . Amendment No. I decreased the retJil spac~ to 51 ,500 square fee t with 4 towers
and 60 tow nh omes .
Amendment ,--:o. 2 is being proposed because the PLO envelopes we re designated as the
building's foot,,ri11ts, Due to market chang~s. more buyers are looking for yard space
• ari~ ~r c.:1,.rt\JrJ C,:\o:ic;:r:~e·~t. Tn~~ C:nur..:~r ,,.,,isPes to creJt~ IJ.";~r e~·.~l.Jpt..·S tc Jlk\\ :1~,;J;rlit\ tc mJ~e c~ar~;fs r tt'e :n~ pfJI"! r~:Jtr. e to c~J,~~:ng ~Jr~t?r C\:n~.1,,t.Js t;ics • r~J::i1~; t J t~~ tr.Jr!,et Jr"C mJktn; :'as;,:r c1anges tc tr.e mJr~ct '-o c~Jr.S,:!S Jr,:! ;:rc;;c;e:: t.; bi.·:::mg ~e ~'iL t:1.,~ r:IJce. se1!:Jd.; c1:m-:? r.::J ,.\J\S J"C s,;~als or trJi:,.: derrancs One ;:ice ;;~c"e:: ::.at me :ncr:J;e m r.?tJil ;;:ace g.?ne,Jtes an JdC1ucnJI .:l.; \o?h1c!es b~, :he .:iec~,eJse n reside .. nJ~ ur.1:s equ.1fs 100 ;,e"!ic~,?s \Ir FJhz shO\\e,;! Jmrau.;ns oi tr2 basic em;loµes and stJ1ed t!ut Ccr.tnuum \\Ould be
unable to build out to tie max:mLm eme!cµes because ~,e unit count. open spaC,:!
requirements a d other restr:c:,cns regulate the e~t>:!nt er tr.e de•,elopment.
An animation or a s~adow s,ud, ,vas shC\\ n. ,\Ir, Foltz stated that no one previous!~
unJiiected 1s affected no\, due to the northern tower en, elop being shirted to the eJst.
Public Oui:st1ons and Gen~r~I Di<cus1ion:
Questions focused on the follo"ing topics :
General lteris
vVho is the lead lender on the project? \,Velis Fargo
Townhome1 21 proposed, rJ nging from 3,500 to -1 ,500 square feet ....,1th 3-w garage;
all are for-sale units.
Condo price ran ge/ S l to 54 .5 million. •
Villa 'townhor:ie price range I S~ to 2.5 million.
\,\ill air quality be affected during construction? \\111 use best practices t.> reduce dust
How mJny units are c~rrentl1 sold rese"'edl 30"o.
\\.hat are the effects oi the prqect on City \\Jter and sewer? Buih to Cit, StJndards and
then turned over 10 the Cir,.
Whal are the dimensions of the western court,ard ·pods"/ Approximate lEO x JOO ieet
contain 6 townhe,mes
Will there be a pooll Yes
Does Lli1s of:ect greens;: ·e? T'le location cl greenspace changes, but the proportion
will not, should actJJII~ h.i,e more at the court,ard area because oi 1ards
-\re the slide sho" n dunng ttus presentaoon a, ailable on the "ebsit,:!1 ,o.
DJtes of public heJrings' DJtes depend on submittJI and re-.iew proces;. Ant1dpa1~1f
\larch -I • Planning and Zomrg Commission
Ap, ,1 11 • Cir, Cou ncil
Archit~cture
Will the architecture remain t:ie sami:?I , es, but \'.ith an attJched courtyard ~ilia
concept.
Is the same architect -'Or~ing on the proiectl Yes, Da, id Owen Tryba Architects.
Dra ir.a3e
An•1 chJnge; to proposed drJ JJ~? No, still proposing underground st:>1a3~ s;stem.
r-.o drainJS' to the wes: o r non'i: all "ill be directed ta Lni1mlty. •
•
•
•
E:1, ~ ~i;e 5i=-:::ac,,; Jr'!t.! 5\-,,k P!Jr.e \'.ill ·"~ tt.rlCi:ig s«:!ba.:"s :r. ,.._.., .\ !sl t,:Lr~CJ ... r~m.:ii;~ the iJr:~~ ~ , es, -1.s bi.rioinfs or t,e .,est boundJr~ ~et ii.:rt:,e, rrom t'1e pr:pe•t\ lrre. Adi the, be Jllc\,ed t~ ncreJse he,~~,• \ es lo rr.1, set b, emelci:e \\ hat rs Lie setback ber.veen IO\vnr.cmes and nort, pr::ipem line' :o reel Can the north tower building s!11i1 ·.,11h111 the e11, elcpe! \ es. that , th e pur;,cse o i the amendment -to allow rle~rbrlitr to plJce buildings wi th111 the em elope rather than rhed ioot;:,rinis. Building can go Jn111here \vithrn the envelope as long as it Jdheres to setbacks.
CJn an en1elope contain both a to\\er and townhomes: ) es
CJn me eJSt line oi the north em elope ha1 e s:epped-cp !:ul~ plane li~e th.11 on the" est
property line/ ConunuLm ":II stud, that.
He,gm
The nonh tower is 14 stories -what ,s the height 1 -9 ieet.
Does enve!ope allow north tower to be 1-9 iett at the eastern setba(~ lrne1 Yes.
Concern expressed that east townhcmes in Amendm e nt I were onl1 2·3 stories tall.
Se tbacks, deten tion requi rements and propos~d amenities 1,,11 control anc building is
ne t ex;:ected to be I ;9 feet at the eastern property li ne.
Parking
Visitor park:ng? More on-site ,isitor parking proposed than pre,iouslv .
How does south to"er parJ..1 Retail parking is within the structure Tnere is potential
for some parking on t'ie roof of the parking structure L'iat would be sc, een from view.
\\ill parking be underground' 1 levefs or par~ing are proposed ,,ithin the structure
How was amount oi parking iiguredl his a blended ratio oi a minimum of 4. 1000
sc;uare feet oi commercial space plus 2 spJces per uniL
Is there er.cugh park ing ior employees; will employees parking on EJst Floyd Place!
Emplo~ee ~arking is included in total parking calcula~ons. rs.o one should be par~ing
off site .
Phasing
What is the phasing? RetJil and rnfrastructure fir st, t!ien residential. Timing is driven by
the market
Is there a threshold of presales need~c! lJ stJrt the retJil construcucr 1 rs.o muluple
things dewmine timeframes
\I.hen \,ill retail cor.st:-ucuon bes-n' Pos: Jppro,al oi t~e amendmer.: r.:?c;uest .
F:etJil Space
What r..pe cf retail \\ill te there 1 Ser-.rce crient:d • remurant bank, ,l.lemll-L,r.ch
in,estment of11ce, specialty food mar~et.
What rs tfie reta rl lease rate/ Vanes.
Who is the resta •Jran t1 Tarbells -fr.:,m Phoenix area -is an nouncerl as a tenan t .
3
Shadow ~\ II L 111\ e• .t·. te 11' 1hadc1,' , es ;11!1~! ,nc-~J -e -=i ;:•a~c ., tc tr~ eJs, m ., 1r1er depending on lccJtrcn oi 10,, er Trame lntersK:1cns 51;,.als Is L"iere a signal JI HJmpce,i: \o. si_ "alized 'i;ll n;,., rn1er1ec:1011 is en Ln,,e,;u-. Are internal streets publk or pri\Jle 1 Pma1e \Vhere Adi con;:"\Jc,,o n trJir,c park I >JI phases allo·., space icr consrrucnon trJfrrc ar.c parking . ,\io parkmg oi;.;,:e.
\,\,hat intersectrcn rmpro\emer.1.1 a•e planned? Continuum ,,ill dedicJt.? land io, the
addi11on of a continuous rurn lane on L'ni, ersrr. extending onto 1,estbound Hampden
and len_then the single lei1 tur~ lane on Lnr1 er;;t, to east bcund Hampden
L'se Changes
What are the proposed use c!ianges 1 Hotel and single•unit residential.
Whv is ho tel being acded l To ha,e the option ta include a small lu,ury boutique hotel wi thin the condo tower .
Example in Den .. erl R1tz•CJrl ron.
Concern abou t trJ11sien1s wi th hotel use. Option rs fo r high-end hotel within condo rower wi th concierge service.
Was the ho tel use In the original PUDI ,'-o.
Why is It proposed / To enhance pro!ect, benerit the communi , , provide development option.
"-11 . Foltz wrapped up L~e presentJt:on b} sJ,ing the publ:c heJring before Planning and
Zoning Commiss ion is tentat11-el) scheduled ior lar;:!1 .f". fne nouce will appeJr in the
Herald and be i:-os ,ed en the property.
S11bmitt<?dbv
Tricia lan.;on, Senior P:Jnner-; L-
Cir1 of Englewocd
Communi De,elopmerit Depar.ment
4
• •
•
• • l'n-Appllcalion Ncl,:hhnrhoocl M e eting S ubject: Amendment lo Dennr Seminary rtannNt tlnll l>evdopmt nl 3'101 Snulh Univrrslly 1loulev1ml Nam e A ddress Cily 11-? .. /1,, "2✓tf; 1,:~L I JLfD uJ >Gc .t> -I c;.,;r?..~ ., (2,&r:ct..-,.);~•t?, r -,3 'h:r-5. ,&-,:.\.~-) ' ., f
0 , /4£[ -
3 <J-c:. ► s (~ 0 I t3,,t.f / " , , .
.--.-~\_ ~ ~ .ct._"'"-'(, ~ r 6,-. "~ ..;)IO I 1:.S\.".}J, I\\JO(_ ~---':)\ ""-"-1 'll) i_\
flkrtt'~ f-n l{ )'1 J"o s. r..,r I,<,< .. b, · ~-e (.Lt r ,
J)l~ b ~l,\ l~(~ z:n k e %=-LO -. cP fl ~~
Sa.t1¢t( ·+iltd Lt_d-:22'1"! 6
(.__,,I
Fl<=?".3 [:Pf ~"~-
JOHN !31,J.'.)b,. -Z.O'l', E FL01 (.} f'L (;..JG
1--1· I I , Tub O {c;;,Y\ 7?11'? 5. {v lJ,i,lh\r./L,-r Y..AI'")
MEA•'>~~~ 3~~1 s. C(Q,~t,,..._ f>\,,cl . ~f)
P/,nu print elearl:,-Thnnk Yo 11!
• . ,_ January 16, 2008 7.ip Code ~ /°r'// 3 --., -• I I -:-,
,,
~ 1, If .:.:?,
a-UI 1 _:;•
<,<;0 I I ~
~113
'i:0 I I':>
';i0 l15
--j Ko 11 3
Pre-Applkation Nelghhorhood Mttilng Subjtci: Amendment lo Dtnvtr entln ■ry Plann .. t Unil Denlopmml 3401 Sonth Unlnrs lly noulnard Na11 " Address Cily J10nu ■ry 16, 2 008 7 1?d . -----t-----------+----
!( 11,J ----twocd ~?Cl t.J
I { / _]
Please print rlmrly-Tha11k You! • • ••••
• • l'rc-Applit-ation Neli:hbnrhnnd Mee_clnc SulJjcd: Am~ndmenl In D enver Seminary 1'1annNI U nit Deve lopme nl 3401 Snulh Unl n r sily lloulnanl Name Adclrus
]JJ/ \J.
C il y
Nease print tleorly-Thank You!
• January 16, 2008
Pr~Appllcallon N•ighborhood M«llng S u hjed: Amn11Jm._n1 lo D,1n•r Seminary Planned Unil Devdopmenl 3-101 Sout h University nnule vard City .Nanf ,~M.),L'tl.\N I \ I Addnss Wi4l{~. rtW I f EN~\.£ 0D9
rturu prin t rl~art:, -Thank l'ou! • •
Jan11ary 16, 200R --'lJ11 c.,.1. i D\\j -
--
---
•••••
.. •
•
•
From: \\"en1ara. Car:-n -CPD [C ar:n.\l';~Z.arJ .icukm er CJ us! Se nt: \\"s-<lncsJJ~. fanuar;. 31). )ll}~ , 31) P'.\I To: Tncia Langon Su bject: Den, ~r SemmJr:-PL 1) Jmendm~r.1 H1Tr,c1a, Th,s PUD al"erdment mace 11s .,ay crto ~y ces~ EXHIB IT D The Cir, anc Courr1 of Den•,er Comt"'~r•r, P'arr,ns anc Oeve oprcent Oe;:ar.r-ent nas ro cor1rrerts or this apphca,~n Thank you nave a nice cay
Cetry"-M. W~ AICP
Sen,or C,ty Planner
COITYnunlly Plann.,g and Oe•1e ooment Departrr.ent
City and County of Denver
PH: 720 865 2940
E-ma,I: CarynWenzara@c ,de,wer.co us
Let us know•..;~, we ?re doing! Prease take a moment 10 complete our Customer Ser11ce Surve y·
~!lY.t.~~DSum,y
•
•
T111; a Langon. S:r,cr ;::1a M .:r
c,ty of Erglewccc
Corrmun,ty Deve 'c Pl!'en: Deranrrert
iOOC Eng ewcod Far~wa ,-
Englewcoc co ec 1 1 c
Re : Kent Place Development (Denver Seminary Redev elopment)
Dear Ms Langon.
Thar.k you for allowing the Er.gmeerr.g Depar:me~t the opeortunory 10 review the Kent Place
Planned Unit De,eloprie'lt Eng1r.eer.rg Starr teas rev1ewec these <!ocu rren ts and has the
fellowing commcr.ts
Ple:ise l:e aware that the l\ent Place Oe·.~,oi:m~r t case k~.own as E06-025 hos yet to
be formally apcroved and therefore conslructIon i;erm.ts shall not be grartec br wor,
wn~,n Ar:ipahoe Ccun1,es R:ght-of.v'/Jy
2 Please ver/ t lliat J tnfi,r. stu~y r~,s t;ee~ er ,s t~.r.;; prc~ared on the: a,,.,.,,.~t:J
pla'lrec um: deve!c~men:
~ C"i,,,:lrHJ •rt # I w..-.. ,... "'-""' ~it.-,:
JI 11 ,1•1
'
F,\ !i..t ,:, )
JJS ~L,I
I• I t I~••,,
,> II, I l I•,
•11,1 ••• ''"
I
',11 11
' 'I -"'' ,II
I I
•
•
~.:.ii,:• l<f' '-"'oe . w ~ :.oo : "" ' .. , C,.., ,. C06 ::: f I JJnuary 31, 200S City of Englewood Community Development Depanmcr.1 I 000 En~lewood P Jrkw3y
Engle"ood. CO SOI 10
A lT'" T:ma Langon
Oe:1tTnc:a.
STATE OF COLORADO EXHIBIT F
RE: KE:'IT PLACE AT CH ERR\' !Il l.LS -Amendment to the PL"D for th e ~\\'C or SH ?85
Hampden Ave.@ l"niversil)' Blvd . (Rer. 007308)
The ColorJdo Depanmem ofTransponJtion (COOT) has reviewed 1he developmem submiuals we received
from your office January 24, 2008. Thank you for meeting with us on January 31 lo discuss some of lhe
concerns we have with the changes proposed in the P!JD The ne" PL 'D proposes an increase or -.J•, 10
lhc mail squ:1te footage and a 50 umt reduction to lhe res1den11al density. Al this poml we are unable to see
how this impac1s lhe traffic at lhc in1ersec11on ofH:unpden and t:nhersity or the impacts a1 the Right 111,
Rig.it Ou1 to H:ltnpden. We cannot commcm, on lhe Pll) unul "e S<.-e a re,iscd Tr.iffic lmpac1 Swdy,
"hach should include 1he re,·ised trip distnbuuon :unong the othe: impacts rell11,c to the chang115 proposed
fo r lhe site. A ne,, Tr.iflic Impact Study mu~t be resubmmed. an Amendment" 11! not suffice PlelSe
mlCj!.IIC the imp:ic:s identifietl and clarifio:d an the l:isl TIS amendment imo the ne" study.
ll as foreseen that these changes 10 the Pl'D 11.'ill transl ate 10 a revised Peak Hour Traffic Volume and thus
require new or amended Access Perm its. The Access Pem1it for the Rig~I In/Right Out access from the site
10 Hnmpden Avenue has been pem1i11ed. The Access Pennit fo r lniversity hls no l been issued and 11 ill be
required before a Xotice To Proceed wil l be issued.
Please h3\ e lhe consuhlm or the De, eloper pro, idc a leltcr explaining" hll 11ls been rc,ased on the PLl).
wha1 lhe implcts are, the chlnges he hJs mldc and a brief summai, of the impacts of tl1e change" hen ,ou
r~submit i.ir our re,iC\,.
The Plans submmed b, separate p;:ckl;e tu , c been reqe1,al by destgr. and lrJftk \\.: "11! ha,e ~IJterials
;and Right of\\"ly revic\\ the plln.s :is \\ell The Pl.in.; are nol aCC:!JllCJ :md s~,crJI re\lsaons will be
c,p.:tled. We plan to meet "ilh the de, elop.:r and tl1e1r cor.sulum 10 r:, 1cw the comment;".: ha, eon the
plans "hen the revie11 is complete
CC R6
Rt::J Akhl\Jn.'TGiOSS
A Oc\'lti> S Hers:v
I J,.M \"r'iO:' Cn} ·ofE r.:1k""-~-,t
L'S :ss a::d :he m1erse;11on \\llh Cn.\<!r;,.-Bl,J Jr~ conm,i!cJ•J.:.:css h1~h"a,s m accorJJnce \\llh the H11.thw3, :\c.:ess LJ\\, Sc.:tt()n J::.2.:J-1 b; T\l\lb:Jm Jem11ss1\lr. hJ .;..,n;trucior rnoJ1i\' a ,ch1culJr ac;ess. ~,her.: such \\Ork ,di be w11h:n mtc h1;h\\J;, r.;;~t •Oi•"l!,, J SIJIC h1gh\\J~ . .\.:c;s, Permit 1s required. Cit, of En;lc\\OOJ 1s ,he Local :\gen,) JnJ tr.: lssurn~ \uthom:, "1thm the major impJ.:ts. Arapahoe Couniy hasiunsdiction on the r'.:ir cast side oi'1hc m1crscc11on ofl"m,ersuy and Hampden on • rhe nonh s1Jc The C11y has requested that CDOT process requests fo. Jcccss on their behalf A :--:oticc to Proceed for the access perm us" 111 hinge on the plan Jcceptlnce Thank you. T :ma and Ladd for meeting "nh us toJ.i~ \\ :ien our m tC\\ of the plJRs is complete I "111 cop~ you on the comment lencr Ii there ts anything I c:in b.: -,f JSS1>t:tncc to. plCJSC do nrn 'Jes11a1e 10 CJII onme.
If you ha,·e any questions rega rding rhis letter. please con1ac1 me a1 303-5 l 2-J 268.
Sincerely.
Patricia Hayes
Access ~ 13nager
PAJ-Ldl
CC. R. Allivnn T Gron
A Dcvuo, S Hmc:y
udJ Vostr, -C'il)'ofEnjl<,.ooJ
CC R6:
Rew Akh>l'>n. T GroSI
A °""'~· S Hmry
LJJJ \0 0\lJ'y-Cl~• ofEr-;le\\ood
•
•
•
•
cm Of e,GLE\\OOD PL-\:-.:-.1,c A\o D zo ,"G CO,\l,\IISSIO ', MJrch -1, 2008 I. C-\LL TO 'JRDER me r,:>gular meenng oi r~e C,1, PIJnning <1ncl Zc-1111111 Comm,s;ion wJs cJllecl to order ,11 -:o~ p.m. tn rt-~ C,t, Courcd Cf1,1mb.:>r, or the Englte\\OOd Cr.-ic Cenrer. Ch.itr Ri>th presiding.
Pr~ent.
Staff :
t. , -t. kiege•. 11::iorh. Rorh, Bleile Calo~der 1-.ing, foh
Alan \\hite, Director, Communitv Developmenr
Tncia Langon. Senior Plainer
Dan Bro tzman, Ci .1 "i>•r.>
II. APPROVAL OF Ml. uns
January 13. 2008
Mr. Knoth moved:
Mr. Bleile seconded· TO APPROVE THE l-\,UARY :?3. 1008 .\11,UTES AS
V,RITTE;s;.
AYES
NAYS:
Brick, 1-.:,oth, Roth, Krieger. foh
None
ABST-\1.-.;:
ABSE\o T.
Bleile, Calender King
Welker
Morion carried.
Ill. PUBLIC HE-\RI\IG
Ca,e #ZO'-2008-01
Den.er Semi11 arv Planned Unir De,elopment Amendment 2
Cha,r Rorh stJled the i»ue before rh~ Comm,s,ion is Ca,e #ZO1'2008-0I, Demer
Seminary Planned Unit De,elopment Am .. ndment 2. Chair Roth asked for a motion to
open the public heanng.
t.\; 1-.rieger mo,ec!:
Mr. B,eile seconded: THE PUBLIC HEARING O:--. CAS E #ZOl\!2008-01 BE OPENED .
A\ES .
1'AYS
ABSTAl\l·
ABSE, T:
Brick, Knoth, Rorh, Kin3, Krieger. Fish. s:eile, Calender
None
None
\\"el~er
. \',. l.1'1•~un. 5e~,or P.Jni•~, ,:,1Ie: Ih,· Iss1,;e 1,~iore rhe Comr.11s,1on" CJ,e ;:ZO,~0Ul-01 Dem er ScminJn P'ann. · L 1111 De1 •·•< pmt!n' ,",me11dmen1 2 "h,ct, ",ls J rezon ing lhJ\ ,-.,s Jppro,ed 111 20l'• , Ordin.mce ,umber 52 Senes oi 2L104 The dppl,cJnt is Con tinuum Partners ll ' . ,,1,. Langon ;i.11~cl ,he JI ead, subm111ed ,nr Ihe rei;md proo, o f 1he cert1:oca11on oi pc-1:113, 1'·J Iour signs \\ere posIed on the p•opem,, Ihar the noIice was pubii,hed in Ihe E~g.e·1ood l~rJ1d 011 Fc!b u.1r, 22. 2008 Jnd rhe S1Jf1 Repori and
at1Jchmenrs. This "a ',ne ,n ace irc.inle \\ii~ SecI,on I o-~.3G oi the Ergle"ood
,\lun,cipal Code.
,\1,;. Lan'.,lon stated rhe Demer Semi;iar, Planned Unir Dt,e1opme'1t Amend01en1 ~ is
berort> Ih.e Commission becJuse the Pu I) D1stricI Plan requires Iha1 Jmendments 10 Ine
D1>I11cI Plan or to Ihe Sue Plan mJ, onlv ht> •1,re"ed under 1he same process as rhe
oligrn,1I Planned Unil De,eiopmeni. She asked 10 ma~e se, e•al comments prior 10 Ine
presen1aIion. Frrsl, Ihere is an error on 1he S1af1 Reper!. On page l O 11 e dale of Ihe
Ar.1pahoe Cou nty le1ter is incorrecI on the atI,,chmen1. On page 4 of Ihe , JD Ihe IO\\er
bulk plane heigh1 in En,elope 3 should read 5-l32, not 5 53~. Both ,11 11 be correcIed bv the
Il me thi s goes 10 Coun ci l.
The original PUD rezoned Ihe siIe to pe I111II 1he pr ,,posed de,elopmenI of relJil and
rt!,1denI1JI uses. a mixed-use de,elopmen1. The originJI PUD and Amendmen t l remarn in •
e11ecI unless modified b1 1hrs Amendmeni 1 The request to amend Is onl\ for the specific
rtems tnal are requested tn be amended. An\ arrangemer.ts ,·.uh out,ide groups from
pre,ious amendment; or Ihc ,rgrnal are s;ill ci,rl issues and not pan of this Amendment 2.
l\nv requiremenIs from ouIside agencies or jurrsd1c11on, 01her 1han the Cu, of Englewood
arr' not oan oi Ihis AmendmenI 2 eiIher. The comment, subm111ed by the ColorJdo
D"par· ""nt ofT ransportation (COOT per1Jrn I<' Ihe preliminary 1uhm111al. They ha,e no1
,ubm111ed 111JI comments ba;ed on thi:, updated 1r,1iric anal1sis that "as pro,icled 10 them.
The purpose oft,,, 1· is 10 consider Ihe PUD modifications un der Amendme11I 2, 10
1ake puhlic I.,sIi mony. 10 make Frnclings of Fac t b,11ed on 1he established criteria th,11 are
found on pages 9 and 10 of the S1,1ii Pepon and 10 mJke a recommenda tion to CiIy
r.,uncil The recommendJlion irom the Communiiy De,elopmenl Depar1me11I is for the
annrng Commission 10 ma~~ 1he follo11ing cond11tnn, of appro,aL
I .\JI Jppro,ed cond1I,ons and requm,m1,n1, e,·.,!>irshec under the D.,n,er Sem111Jr,
PL'D Jnd Demer S.?minar1 PLID • Amo?ndm1::1I I shJ'I appll unit.>,, am.,ndt:!d b,
>,m,•ndment 2
2 Amendmenl 2 ackno"ledg •s 1he need io1 Pex•ble de, elopment op lions by
estahl1>hing Ihree (31 de,elopmen 1 en,elopes. Technical siIe plan rede" of d11,elopmenI
"uhin saicl en,elopes shall be by '.:1e De,elor111en I R~1iew Te,1m for co,npliance ~llh PUD
,ind City deve lopment standards •
•
•
f:1Jt f,,·.,...o;:l' ~ ... h.1 1)1 1 11t!1'..,t! 10 u.,,e .. p•·r•,itt! ... ,J m t!'t! h 1u~~:~orr. ,-r~ (.,1:t:":;1Jr, ,n :~., PL D , T.ii "vi .i, ~,N, .,d l ,,,, J . Hoh?! L>e ;ra!I oe locared ,,. en\elopes I a:1J J. b. Horel use ;rJ.I 'IOI be a ,e~ UJI<' ,rand-a,one u~e. c. n,e maxomum number or ho rel roo ms ,hall be 150. d. Ii horel use o, appro·. ed. rhe iollm11ng gt1es1 accommodarion
,1II011a11c~ ,1ppro1ecl m 1he orig111,1I PUD sh,111 be amended 10·
The numo1er or residenli,11 umrs does nor include
propos.?CI gue,1 accommodJ11ons for gue,rs oi residenrs oi lhe
pro1ec1. Such spaces shall nor exceed 900 S.F. and no more rhan 1110
such spaces per reskw?riil l ronc!omioium !Pi'-'eC buildin g ( 12 lotaH
shall be pro, ided."
The applicanr is propo,ong a sire plan amendme~t to address de\ elopment is;ues resulring
in ch,mgin g marker condirions. Thev are proposing changing from a bu ildin g foorprint
method of developmenl 10 an em elope concep t. Tt->e envelope concep r establishes 1he
area and the bulk plane 111 \\hich srrucrural developmenl can occur Ir does nor mean that
rhe emelope ,.ill be tilled complete!, only 1ha1 d('\,e!oprnenr can occur \\ithin the
t>oM!lope areas. The original PUD and Amendmenr 1 designared footprinrs for each
1ndi1 i-Jual strucrure. The applican1 ,s proposing these larger em elopes so !here is Aexibolitv
10 mc,e rhe locarlon and orienration of rhe build ings. II is also l·,.•ing proposed as a larger
emelope so 1ha1 each time rhe applicant suggem mo\ing a .. ng or the orienration
changes it doe; not require rhe PL D prc.ces, as outlined in rlie origi nal PUD. The PUD
process rakes abour fi1e monrhs. The applicant can speak to rhe issue of being able 10 have
a more timely merhod 10 addre,s possible changes.
Ms. Langon referenced a dm,ing oi rhe proposed de1elopmen1 on the projecrion screen.
Emelope I i; localed in rhe so•Jlheastem portion oi the site and conrains MO sections,
En,elope IA and En,elope 18. Em elope I .I. \\J> rhe area on rhe original PUD thar \,as
nored as re1Jil in the southeasr corner. In rhe original PUD rhe max imum height in rhe
commercial areJ 1,Js 41 feel. Under lhe proposed Ame ndme11 1 2 It would be raised to 45
/,;er . Em elope I B " 1he area idenrified in rhe ongonal PUD ano in Amendmenr 1 a,
con1,1ming condom,mum to11ers I and 2 and rhe he13h1 oi rhose bu,!dings "ere 121 and
150 feel. Those heoghr, are unchanged in Amendmenl 2.
Emelope 1 is locare d along the "estc•n border and conrains areJs ide ntnied in 1he origina l
PUD and in Amen.Jmenl 1 as a residenti.! srea for to11nhomes, ro11houses and the inrernal
ro.id11ay Under Amcndmenr 2 rhe emelope :~:~ been \\idened and is no\, a rotal of 240
feer deep as measured from rhe 1,estern boundary into rhe site .
En,elope 3 is rhe remaining secrion along the norrheastern portion of 1he sire and con tains
rhe 3rea idenriiied in rhe original PUD and in ~mendment 1 for de,elopmenl of
condominium ro"er; J acid ~ ',\II~ mJ~im;.,m hei'(hh of 165 and I -9 fr,;t rt>f)l!Cti,el,
3
6.-cJ ... "C' Jr t'."'~ ,\ :-:•lt:"''-! Ct E•~-.e't)~-:-: E ... ·.t:a P' J b n,, .. , n.l .... '\\o;' J'l<l ;JlJ~f-ttd f'!ltJre to l"'t" ,?.;,~:. P:-op.·,.,'-' nt", .?:,\ 1r.. fre t!llil!~ c~\ dl,f.. ~ 1., I-,. ·c:-~ t The e,ult 01 1his e,,,.,;~;,e s,s1em e,1,1bli,hc•, ,11,•J, w \\h1d1 dewlopmcnl 111,11 orCllr. II due, 1101 rneJn the entire t11elope 11111 be comple1el, 11 •d. II merd1 ou1l111e, the Jrea ,,,hero:? c!t:,elopment mJ, oi:ct.· II ri'mo,e, 11e n,ud locJI rt:·tuirement, or 1ho:: hu,ic!in~ 1001~ nt, .,nd remo,.,, tht> •rt;~irc.·•~n1 ror 11,.:1.re amt>ndm,m1, 101 e,e, sole plJn chJn!le. \\h1c~ tJk,>; apprc\11:1Jrel, 111e monrh II prn"c!e, Je,t?lopmenr uppor1u1111v. cre11l\11\ and 1le~ib11it,. Ir allo,H de,elopmen1 10 adjus1 more qu 1c~I, to chJng111g ·nJrke1 nnd ,·,ons iht!
en,e;opes are si111il,1r 10 01her zone cli,1rk1s in 1he Ci11 · 1hev iur:1ion in 1rie; 1•11~ b,1>ic
s:,1nc!Jrd in tr.a: 1i,e~ ,denur, 11 ht!re de, elopment cJn occur The, also . e 1: e areas thJI
are ,denritied '"rhin the PUO thJt cor•espond to 1he 01>lnt1 Plan and ,.here panicu!Jr
zomng regulatio~;. bulk plane or heigh1 requirements mav appl,. Tre PUD'· 0,':'rall
conr rolli ng ~ocumen1 is the 01stnc1 Pla n and 1hat controls and mo<ii to,, 1: ,.; :., •. , ;. ,n~
heigh1. Set bdcks and uses. The en,elopes detJ ils the de1elopme111 ~--➔ S1Jif is p,opr ;11:g
1hat iurure re,ie\\S \\Ould be under rhe Oe,elopme'11 Re\ie" learn .. , •, " -~sis,s oi
se,en C,1, depanmenu that re11e,., permirs.
There are t110 permi11ed u;es being added to the T.1ble oi i\llo"ed Uses in Amendment ~.
They are:
• One-unit detached di, elling a~d I\, a-unit dwelling on the resid.,'1tial side
Tha i prolides add111011JI rle~ibili11 for the pos;ibilir-oi an 111dil'1dual home
rJ1h er rhan a 1ownho111e. ro"home or some t,pe oi auached housing.
• Hot t!!: Addition oi hotel use allo11s rhe opr ion for , :esr accommodations on
site.
The fo llm,ing amendment, are proposed for e~isring allo"ed u,,,.
• Increase in the maximum com1111::rcial Ooor areJ (rerail and office space) from
51,500 to 75,000 square feet.
• The residential unit count is being proposed to be dropped • 1 350 units 10
)00 U1111S
• Mod 1rkatio11 to the number oi par~ing Spi!Ces Js,ociared "ilh 1he c h,1nge 111
u<Ps.
,\\, l ,,,gon 11an1.,.d to be dear that an) u,e 1h,1t ,s proposed 111 Amendment :! th.11 11
allo\\ed 111 the PUD ma, loca1e 1111h111 anv em elope ,,ithm th e PUD as long a, they meet
rht: 01,1r1c1 s1anclard requi remen ts for hei~ht, bulk plane. setbacks and uses.
In rhe original PUO and in Amendment I rhe western portion of the de-elopment was
designated for lo11er densify residential use . This area is proposed as Emelope 2. Because
1hi1 area "as r'esignated and appro,ed for residences 11ith lo11er height and bulk standards.
•
hore l use may no t be an Jppropnate use in rh is en,elope. Therefore, Communit) •
De, el0pment Deparrment recommends thJt Em elope 2 be limited to allo"ed uses
perm1t:ed ,n tl,e "household li,ing" categol) of rhe PUO s TJblP of Allowed Uses.
•
•
5H~i.'.I:' L't~1 L;:e I) 1, ., w 1UCt 1(111~ t""t-1 '-· ~L-.. 1 :1 ,~ oi tt""' Jl con~'"le"'• ·:.11 ~pJv: r!· · ,.,, uld o,.• -5 i't st:;uiU-! It! or co~1m~r~r .. 11 "PJC-.? ;:,1u~ : ... • ho·cl u~e thJt ·,t1U recom,ni;:indm~ ro he \llh111 the IOI\,!• bu1,d1, :. Th<' 011: -.ouni, :O\\Jrj 1he 1 1.11 re;:di:nu.il um!) 11 di, ,n l co~n, t<l\\Jr ... , com 1c·c1JI >PJle. n e Jpµlk.i,: 1; propo,mg one ho1e: ro m \,1 :I et;u.il one•hJ!r .: ., ,.s,d 1111JI um:. -\: th; r.i:io 1re,e cou!c be up to bOO ho1e1 r 10m; 11 no 1or-,11e r.-,dc1111I 1m,•, \\e,._. con lrUCl<'d S,nce !"1> could dramaucJ.!, change th, .ilre.1d, Jppro, PL=' I . Commun,,, De\ elopme,it Oepanme,i1 recommend; 1he iollm, inir
• Hn1e, u,e be lom11ed 10 just emekpes I and:!
• Ho1el u,e sh.ill n be a <'para1, ;,and-alone use
• The ma,1mum nunine• or hotel rooms shall be 130
• Ii hotel use 11 aopro,ed. 1he follo11in~ guest ac.co~rnoda1ion allo1,ance
appro, ed on ,. original PUD shJII be ament.'.ec 10:
J, The number oi residential unit! does n-::1 include proposed
gues1 accommoda 1ion for guests or residen ls oi the project. Such
spaces shall no t exceed 900 S.F. and no more th.in two such spJces
per ce~idenri,ll coodomioiurn rower bui ldiAJ 11 2 t shall be
pro1ided.
Ms. Lar1gon reierenced 1he setbJc~s chart included in the meeting packet. Ms, Langon
asked the Commissioners if rhev 1,uuld like her to re,ie1, the chari at 1h,s time Thev did
nor.
In the original PUD and in ,._m~ndmen1 I, the nt mber of parking spaces was specir1ed as
actual numbers. Amendment 2 is proposing goir ~ to tallv 10 a ratio. Because the buddings
are nar se1 and squa, footage ts no t set other than b maximum, lhl! e,act number of
parking spaces needed cannot be dt:t~rmined at this time.
The building height; in Amendmen 2 unless specified, are inclusi, e and all portion, of
building· and their projec11ons hJ\e to be ,1ithin the bclk plane·. That 1s unchanged from
pr• ious The ma,imum bu1iding height ai an> gi\en point is a function of bulk plane
,und,, c, Bull,. plane create, 0 !tepped" he1gh1 increment· "hereb) 1he upper floors of
huildings are et :.,r1her from prope,t, line 1han t'ie lo"er floors. This reduces a structures
,, .-r.111 hulk, ailU1H acces t11 s ,gh t 1, ithin th<" de, elopment and reduce, shado" s on
ad1a,t>nt propt:!rll~). Bulk plJne •,,cps· are shown on PUO 3 and cross secuons illustming
height and bulk plane or the proposed em elope are shm,n on sheet PUD -1. Ms, Langon
re,ie" d th,. chm on luded in t'ie StJr'i Report on bulk plane and heieht in each envelope.
/.ls . Langon stJlt:'d she \\Ould lea,e the discussion of shado1,s 10 the applican t.
The City Trafuc Engineer ,ind COOT h,1,e re,ie1,ed preliminary report; and a secondary
report has b er, sent "1 bmh groups. Fox Higg in s Transporta tion Group prepared an
analysis and co,,clud cl 1h,11 "the proposed change In IJncl use results in a negligible net
efiecr on sit,;, 1rar11c imparn Th findings and recommendations of the originJI tram~ are
still, Jhcl r,ir l~is project."
\h. l.m.:,. ,, ,h~l.'tl ~H :he t.11t.! "-it~~ ht:"Jrill~ th:· CmT:mb~11.)n r.1~1~i:: Find1:1~;. 01 f.H..J h~l~t.-U on th: ,mt>•Ia on pJ~e ., c i th? ~1J1i Rtpor; ,me! c;i n,,ut'~ 1.,., r,!l.omm,.,11c.,i:1on, ',\Ith cond1tu~~ ~1~ propn'!-~d b\ Lomn~u:"IH\ Oe\tt1q~m~~L ThJI c ec.udi!d \t, LJ")l•)r. , prn,•11I.11 O''. Sne 01iered 10 ars·., ~r an, que,H(Jn; 1r.,-C rnnmI»Ion 111,3~1 h,r." \\r 1-.mg J;ked hov. m.1m 1c·1.1I h!>1d.,n 1 •'. ,11, l~t!rs, .:ould be ,i a 11<.,1,1 ,. ,, includt!d i11
the proiect Shi >!Jled tr,i'r~ cr,u c be ~-• ., 't'SICt'nt1al unn; plus 1,Q ho1t!I r,Jun1>. ,\Ir Kmg
\\Jnted con11rn1JtIon cune~, p.irking requ11e,.1ents are~ pJrkmg ,p.r.e, ptr resid,m!IJI unit.
She s,Jted that ,, a; correct H~ a,ked about 1,e proposed .'5 space 1,e, hotel room. He
.isked II StJII hJd a recommendar,on on 1h.11" 1ber. She said hllJuse oi the t,pe 01 hord
Ihe applican1 is prop~•sing S1J11 reit 11 ,P :; o:,1Ce \\Ould be adrq•,a. • rd more lhJn likely
the hotel use "ould he "',,,., e\enmg use " ·,ch ccu1-I utilize thl! daytime retail parking
sp,,rp, Mr. King a;ked I th, .1~1 unit, woul,J be iore,er designated as hotel unit, or could
they be con~ened into ior-:ll..: un it s at some point in time. Ms. Langon stated tha t 1,ould
be a ttuestion for the apnlir.ant.
Mr. Fish as ked if the emelopes ,,ere accura Iely represertcd on the drawing or do they
overlap. Ms. Langon st,1kd that thev are an actual rep resentJtion and do not overlnp al any
point
Mr. Fish asked Ms. Ldngon to clarify 1,hat •~c Deve lopment Review Team Is. She stated it Is •
mJde up of seven City departments (Building. Fire Utilities, Wastewater, Engineering,
Tranic and Community De,elopment). It is a technical revie" group t hat provides re,ie\\
ior development within the City. \\ hen a building footprint is established ,,:thin one of the
1 n,elopes it would go the Development Re, ie" Team for review of all the technical data
that would be required for de, elopment. Ms. L.1,igon noted there is no re>ised street layou t
,n the envelope system and 1he entry\, J\ s ha,e alreadv been set.
Mr. Fish .1~led II under the em.elope sceri,uio the applicant could build to the ma~1mum as
long a, th meet all rec;uirements. Ms. Langon stated that "as correct In addi11on to ,,hat
has alrt!ady been discussed the rloor areJ comes into plav. 1'ot e,er, em elope could be
built out to the maximum because there is onlv 75.000 totJI squarl! feet for commercial.
The\ could not possibly mePI the m,1~imum height in e,ery en,elope and st,1y under the
maximum 0oor area. Mr. F"h a,ked II there "as a maximum squarl! footJ'<I! r,;r th.,
re,id,mt1.1I She SIJtt'd onl1 unit ,-.se ,, h1Ch i, 300 (up to 685,000 total squ.1re fl!et}.
t-tr. Bll!1le asked ho" the e~trJ 50''• increase 111 the commercial floor aIeJ \,as esrablished
Ms. Langon stated I t could be mul11ple floors or uses in orher buildings.
Ms. Fish no ted a discrepancy in tr,1fric \Olume in the State of Colorado, Departrl' ~, or
Tra nsportation traffic leI1er (E~hib it Fl and Ihe traffic study. Ms. Langon said the COOT
comments" ere prelimin,1rv. They have been prO\ided additional informa tion and ha,e Mt •
provided co111111en1, b,1ck ~ht• s,,id Ihe applica111·; transporlJtion represenI,1ti, e will speJk
to lhJI.
6
•
•
\\s ,rr~'.!~r !o;lrd th~ll :.inli: nl,t t'\r:r·.c l't' h,l'.'o .ll.-.._t'!':-> ro rl~t' S1.111 Rcpun, µlc::.h~ ~~\It'',\ tht1 ;e1back, ;or e,er10,1e prt'>~n l. ,\Is. LJ11~u,, µrn11ded :he currcn1 ,t!1b,1ck, Jnd propu<,:d ,elbJck, lllr El1\ elllpt'> I , 2 .111d 3. \\r. Ke"n Fot1z. Con1muum PJnner, \\J> S'IOm in. He thank.-d 1he Com1T11ssion ior allo\\ing Con11nuum Panners to pre~t!nl ano1her amendr1en1 10 1he PL.D. He inlroduced
h,s IeJm Jnd or consullanis 1ha1 "ere in ,111end,1nce.
Da,id Center. ,\\B Consulting
)us1 in e Willman. Co1111nuum PJrtners
Jerern~ Bieker i1 ,ba A1ch11e~1,
Sieve Tuu!e. Fox Higgins Transportation Group
Scou Halpin, Tryba Archuecis
He stated due 10 1he sluggishness 01 lh t! rf<ideniial market ii is necessary 10 come back to
the Commbsion w ith sligh1 modiiica1 ions 10 1he PUD. What we don't want 10 be doing is
doing 11,:-every 1ime some1hing changes e,en ever so slight!~. Cont inuum, as the
developtr, is commiuecJ 10 1he sile, 10 1he de,elopmenl charac1er oi 1he sire a.,d nothing in
1ha1 ,s chan!!,ng 1hrough 1h,s moditica1ion 10 the PUD. He presen1ed a slide show on the
pro1ec1 and chan!l,eS proposed in Amendmen1 2 Included "ere slides sho,,ing lhe original
;,1e plan, the curren1 sile plan an~r Amt'ndmen1 l. conceprual s,Ie plan, 1>ha1 is proposed
under Amendmen1 2. and shadO\, slud}.
i\lr. Fohz oiiered 10 Jnswer any queslions 1he Commission mighl ha,e.
i\lr. Bleile asked aboul the northeast corner of the properly in regards to green space and ,f
1~a1 area 11ould e,er be de,eloped. Mr. Fol1z said 1hey have an obliga1ion to provide
landscaped open space unJ~r 1ht: exis1in!l PUD Under 1he curren1 concep1 1ha1 is where
1he green space 11 ould go. There al,o would be ou1door space by 1he pool and by the
cluslers oi homes along the western edge of 1he property. Mr Bleile asked abou1 1he
addition oi yard ,pace 10 the residt!tl!IJI art!a Mr. Fohz said 1he pre,ious de,ig,, \\dS
somewhat more of an urban design Iha1 had 11.·mical three-srory to11nhomes. Those are nor
as appealing in tht! marke1place at 1his 11me; people are looking for more ourdoor space.
I.Ir. Bleile asked "hat percen1age has been sold. Mr. Fohz said 1hey ha\.e been up and
dm,n, but is fairly IIJt That's why Conllnuum 11an1s 10 do something that is a driver and
can ,nihah! dt'veloflmen1 on si1e. \\ t' art! focu,ed on gemng aclMty s1arted. i\lr. Ble,le
a,l.ed II ha1 brough1 1he big push for 1he hotel 10 light Mr. Fohz s.11d it is a driver 1han can
help generdlt! dt!,elopmeni, ii s a ca1alys1 1h,11 can help ,n a sluggish residenlial marke1 10
di,ersiiy a lower, and 11·s a I ery compatible use \\ ilh the luxury residenlial produc1 we are
offering. There is dd1n,1ely nothing saying thal is "hat "e are puuing on 1he site, ii is jus1
some1hing that 11e certa inl y see as a co111pa1ible use wilhin 1he development.
,\Ir. Brick askecJ 1,hJI lhe communi1y can expec1 10 see built by July 1, 1009 11i1h the
assumption 1ou re,.:11e appro,al on .-\mt'nd111en1 ~-i\lr. Fultz ,aid tht!y would immeclialely
7
pro1.t"'d .:>11 th, d._.,,., p11·~•11 , E·•·.e op<! I ":,1e:· "ould 1:1c!1.;c~ th.,-,,.t,11 JrJ t,J,-•d o,, r.,-,rc,.,mJ >J«:> o, ... tnt.' ., ... ,: ,._.,,, month, a pot,>nu.1i 1,,"e' T'·c•-, p,oi-Jllh "11uld IJ ,• son,e irt•,1>a1,c:ur,• ,~,pr , ... m~~t anci po~,ibl, some ce,elopmt'~t 01 the du,:,•r hom~, alon,: tr<! \\c>t ,1c!<! \Ir. Foll: adcres,,>d parl.111:,i tor the resid<!nts hott', and retJ1o H<! stat.!-:l a ' r<!,id<!nll.11 parl.it'~ ·., he at grade. Deµer.di~g on demand. pJr~ini tor the to"e,;. co1.,icl go s,., ... ,.11 e, .,., unc<!•g·.:iund Comme,ci,•• '>ar~ir r1,.1~0:,.1I ,r :,on: ot the shop;. 1"tr. Ca !c,nd e• as~ed "hen Corunui;m "ill kno,· icr Su"' "ha: th" .1re go,ns to bv"rf on each emelope \Ir tv · •1t' the, ,hou' ,... ··,ru, ~lier Cit, (ound ,1ppr0\JI. He
sLted it is a large imestment .o ccntinl;1-1<, ' ··ir :! led;e and go 10r.,.1rd \\lthout the
kno\\le<lge oi knO\\irg Amendment~ i, goin~ • appr:-,ed. A 11)\\er 1s market and pr<!•
sale dri, en. It is not something that "e can st,1r: construction on "11hou1 a clear sign 01 a
residen1 1al rebound.
,\Is. l\rieger asked where Continuum fort:.ces the hotel customer, coming from. Mr. Foltz
sold DU. the hospitals and Cherry Hills Country Club. The location dra" s in 1our directions .
Mr. 1-.ing asked about financing. Mr. Foltz said 11nanci ng is contingent upo n many IJCtors,
presales being one oi them. absorption , market. dynamics and credi t rates .
Mr. Bleile asked what kind oi hotel partners Continuum has talked lo. Mr. Foltz said they
ioresee the hotel as unbranded and operated by a proiessional operator tha1 ties Into the
reser. JI ion systems, but \\Ould not be a nauonal type chain. Room rates -.ould be
expected to be In the S 150 a night range.
Mr. Fish expressed his concern; regarding increased trafric in the area. He stated he tra,els
the intersection oi Hampden and University every morning and e,en at this ume it 1s
already congested. Mr. Fo ltz said the 5 parking ratio for the hotel is achie\able, especially
on a shared parking basis. Tris 1s not a stand-alone hotel locauon. All of the other
commerc;JI locations are allocated at 4 per 1,000 square feet. He said they know if people
cannot rind parking in the de, tlopment they "ill not come back. For the commercial to
sunl\e parking has to be accurate. Thet "ill be v,orking with parl..1ng consultants and the
hotel operator to rnsure the parking counts are met.
Ms. l\rieger said she ielt raising the to"nhouses to 55 feet seemed pretr, extreme \'vhat
-.as }Our rationale/ Mr, Foltz sJ,d It "as deri,ed 1rom the old site plan "here there were
the large three-story townhomes along the interior. He said unul the grading is ligured out
1,e are c,1pped at a ceiling th at 1s no longer based exactly off the grade but on the USGS
ele,ations. We did not see an impact in shade," stud, or in height so long as ,1 e kept the
s11:p bacl..s consistent 1\lth the origin · .,UD.
•
Mr. Fish noted originally the t01,nhc. , \\ere prices at S500,000 to S 1.5 million. Now
then! are condos from S I to S-1 .5 million and townhomes from S2 to S2.5 million. Has that
whole area been upgraded 10 a higher encl! Mr. Foltz said it is in direct response to buyer
feedbJck .... lJrger units, outdoor spJ,e and 3 car garages. •
ThJI conc'ud,;d Mr Foltz', pr~,,;ntJtiun. ChJir Ro th thanked him fur hi, toe,11mc,n1,
•
•
\' St1:,t. ~ i~:~:e ..,, Fe, Hi;:.!1'."I,-1 . t:.1;1 o i: (; ,t.p \\.1::i ;!' ... orn ir, He );J:c-d am, ,:n'c: tl'e't' , J d1Jr. Je m l.i11d us<! in,..,,., , • 1n Jee-?,; per:rnt .rom tr.e on gin al proposal COOT requtr.:, ino::re Ot: J re,:ud, Tha; ,, ,•. JI dro\e 1;.,, ·ece~t arJi\,is. He p10\1ded J c;u,,~ o,e~1e\, 01 :re en<!(: or me l,,nd u,c? coan3e rrom the orrgiral PLO. The original rramc rn.d, Jssumt'd bO 000 square reel or re1a1I plus 5 "1X' ,.:;uue ieet oi onlce. Trac numh:• 1, no·., -,; 1'1!11) square iee• or com<"'•· , Oiuce csc ma, be up 11, ~ -.\;vO s.:;uare reel or thJt number A, ~oi; set into hu:rer cmv Jt1os "e get into less 1ra111c generated. Re1Jil uses" one o: rhe h1ghe,: generator, per sr; .ire ioot "fiereas oiiice is a much less intense tranrc
generator The end result or the d•,nge ,ersus the numbers ,n the orrg,nal trafr,c stud,
depending upon ,,hat percenias"' u1 ·,1i1ce you use. is irom an 8''• decrease in o,erall dail,
traitic 10 a J•o increase '"'h th!! IJtc.1 land use p:an. Those numbers 1,ere sent to COOT
for them to address their concerns ,,,1f, respt>ct 10 access permits. He said 1he1 have also
been 1,orking 1, id, the City 10 readdres; the tranic queuing and congestion issues in regard
10 the Hampden 1Uni1ersi1y intersection and the site access intersection. The findings of
those analysis were that those changes we,e neglig ible in IP.rms oi storage lengths required
for turn lanes and trafr1c ques, He oiien~d to answer any questions the Commission m,w
ha,e.
Mr. Fis h asked ii they, the de, eloper, still an1icipa1e co nverting the left turn lane on
Un,,er;ity heading sou th to a double rurn lane or lengthening the exist in g lane. Mr. Tuttle
said that lane will be lengthened to maximize storage. He said they are still working with
COOT with regards 10 .-~provement to the southbound right turn lane on University. lnere
also 1,ill be a signdl at the Kent PIJce access point oii Uni1ersity 1ha1 will be coordinJted
1\lth the signal soutt-.in Hampden.
T~ere 11e•e no fu.ther questions ior Mr. Tuttle. Chair Roth thanked l-,lr. Tuttle for his
testimony.
Mr Foltz ask~d ii there wer, am other questions ior the de1elopmen1 ,~am There \\ere
none
MelJ nie Ne lson: Expressed concern, regarding the shado\\in,: by the 1-.ent place to"er,
a~d trie fact some homes he·, iiicluded. 1,ill be? in sbdll" ior s~,eral hours a day,
especiall1 ,n 1, inter
iim f'.:e lson: Ha> 11,ed 1n Eng'e"ood ior r 1ears. He expressed concern, regarding
shado"ing on Flovd Place and Fioycl -\\-enue.
'-Ir. Bric~ stated un der Amendment I, 1,hich has alread\ been approved, buildings ha1e
been approved up to I i9 feet. In Amendment :: the height of those buildings remain at
I 79 fet1t, there is no change In height. Are you asking us at this point 10 re,erse the heights
1ha1 are stated in the fir)t Amendment? Mr. r>:elson sa id that is correc t.
1-.:r foh as~~d \Ir '\ebo11 l•J point Ol,t hrs hori:e on the map o/ tne are.1. ,._,,. ,'\elson r!1d so
9
,\\Jrv eco r ' '\lh!'1clt',J 111 ,~ 1 , rt c1 h.-r n.,1~"l'u, ., "o J•t' bein, o er~ome "1th ,1 .1 'I\ HJd 1ues:1on, in •e;Jrd 10 t "c.,,eiope,· ,,anun" 1;e,,b1'.1t\ Jnd not ha,mg 'J 11, : ,.,_. 11,e month, to mo,e thm? arounu on tht' d111eren1 .,-,,elopes and teJrs 1ha1 111th .i : .. r::;e de1eloprnent on t"e rorn er Seminar. prop Ill that i1 m,1, tun "hat ha; bt, n a ,e" ,t.1bl, iJmil~ orien1e.; ne1g~norhood into more or a rentJI prope,11 are,1 becau~e 01 IJC oi ,unsh1ne .ind increJsed tr a·11c. .\Ir Fish asked \Is Sec ir 1,1 001 1 out ht'· home on the map. Sile did o.
Craig Cah en· ,\Ir Cahen SIJted he is an architect and President oi Cahen Architec ural
Group . His fam has been eng,1ged by the l\ent village Homeo11ners ssociation frvm dcJ~
one of this projen He SJid he 1s here 10 speak on their behali and their behalf alone and
does not represent am other neighborhood as;ociJtions. He said the project h.is gone i•om
a final developmen t plan, in our opinion, 10 a preliminarv de1 elopmenl plan, which 1, ..
un heard of. He sta led he has met 11i1h ,\Ir. Foltz and Cont inuum on the ma iler and ht'.
unde rstands thei r pos11ion, He sa id he is not here lo say Ken t Vill age is in opposition of th(:
developme 11 i. They ful ly belie , e a, a team the projec t will be a Cl ass A Jevel opme nt, i•
on a Class A si te. The co ncern 1hey have is in rega rds lo Am endmen t 2 and certa ,11
condi ti om tha l they 1,ant cleared up and bro ught to the Comm iss ion's atte nt ion,
I.
2
3,
Clarifyi ng the approval process on the docume nl .
Language and graphic indica tion and solution ro a mutually accepted I vel
regarding dormer deiign In En velo pe 2.
Confirma tion tha bed and breakfast is not included in the Household Liv ing
Section for En,elope 2
He said as far as Kent illage is concerned there is enough language in the Amendment
that the feel the de,elopment can move for1,ard given the above criteria.
Mr. Bnck asked Mr Ca hen 10 expla1!'l "hat a dormer is. He did so.
Mr Fish a ked Mr Cahen II he could elaborJ e 01 • t: bulk plane steps and how the relate
10 Kent dlage. Mr. Cahen stared that the bulk planes that 1,ere es1ablished in the first go
round have been maintained . The only difference is the Amendment increases the height
from 46 to 55 feet. \,\.here the\ I-a, e cione that is far enou~h away from the l\ent 1llag.-
properr lint! 1ha1 11 i, not a wntt''ll an<l tht!y under;tand the r"asc 1s ior the changt!
Mr. Brick as~od for darification as 10 1• hat they want regarding t~e approval process . Mr
Cahen said his sta tement Is 10 simply put on record that going before tht: Planning and
Zoning Commission and City C.ou11cil is being done away with . Final appro, al through the
De,elopmen1 Rev iew Team is acceptable.
•
Mr. Blei le ask<!d 1-.ho the C:o rme1 language discussio n is between. Mr, Cahen stated It i,
between hi> comnany and the de,eloper. •
10
•
•
Jnn ,1h IJll.,r \Ir, ·:Jl'<1r 0111~· I out '-1, l•l t 1tt 1,:·1 flt' map :nr th, C,11111·11 ,I11111:e• . H., ... \J'~., ~t:!' .... 11,., t,.,,£ .,., ud ~ tVt' toll ot pnJ\ICln2 no,1Lt' l'l1r pv:1t1L nt'Jrmg , .. unu!'iul1l. Ht-,:.i··• i '"'>r ~r·h r c. ... •dr: '-! t'1t' t'' r: up:t onccpl tht' 't'OllJ\J, 01 h'"" :n\\nhJ11·"~' tlt1 th~ • ,:t•t'J I pomon I In~ ,.,...,,...opr1 ni, 1:•t' mcre,1se m commeroal ,p,Kt' ,ind iramc. Kennt:lh Cnbh He r pr1:e ,,•i.l concern r,~~3,d,ng me n11~ 01 re,1den11al. ~-olel and C•}nlnlt''CI~ l ~e p/a1,,rnwr11 01 1:ie IIJ\\,'' on 1he no,tn ,d' ,ind reels m, I> 001 J COOlll\Ullll\ .:en ered -\men<lmt'nl .
,\Ir Caloncl;!r a k~d 1htt di:,elopt>r 10 di;cu,, 1he is;ue of .hado•,, ing iunher
\Ir. l,!rPm\ B1 ker ,,as ,\,orn 111 He 1a1ed the shado,, s1udv is from a compuM gen rat~
sa1ell,1e program and is qwte accurate. \\r Calender asked ho,, long a shadow ,\Ill impJc l
one person , home, Ir Ft)h asked II the srudv "a, a \\Oflt ~ase ,cenario shado" based on
rhe highest bulk plane poin t. ,\Ir. Bieker staled thar "as correct. He re,iewed the
sh;ido,,1ng slices oi 1he poller po int pre,entJlion tJ ken ar 1hree diift'rent times oi the year
at three diiierent points during 1h e day,
l\lr. Fol1z s a1 ed one of 1he reas ons Envelo pe 3 was shiited lo lhe east is becaus e of an 80
to 90 foot righ1-of-way. That in addiuon to 1he 20 foo t setback and ano th er 2 j ieet of step
bJck seemed a logical place 10 pul a prev io usly approved bui ld ing em elope. He n.J led the
30 dJ re,icw process 1hrough the Development Revie" Team hJ s no1 chJn g~u
Ihrougho u1 any of the PUD' . The dormer clari11ration is some1hmg 1ha1 has been dbcus ~cl
and \\Ould agree 1ha1 ,,e can come 10 a very simple cla rifi ca1ion . The potentiJI 4"o increJse
in 1raiiic depends on how much office ,,11/ be built; at thi time "e do nol kno" how mu ch
01 1he J/lO\\ able comme rcial quare footage I\ 1/l be commercial ersus reiail space.
It Brick asked ,,.,r Foltz ,i Continuum has any plans 10 se ll the property, Mr Fol1z slated
1hey did not, 1hey are 1otall comm111ed to developing the properly.
Michael Act : Hee pres,ed concern there 1s nothing concrete to look al. He ,,ould like 10
see ,ha1 Con1inuum ha rn mind to d , elop on lhe si1e .
l\lr B,ttile mo,t!d:
.r Fish sttronded THE PUBLIC HURl:\G O CASE =Z 0:\!008-01 BE CLOSED
.1.H·
1\-\\ S:
ABSTAI~
ABSES.:T :
Brick 1>.no1h , RrJ lh, Kri~11er, l>.ing, Ble ile, Calonder, foh
None
l\one
\\elker
Mahon m i d,
At 1his li mo: tile Commission trJok a 10 mmu1e bre ,1k .
LP.I the record show th,; meetin I recon,en·d at l J:00 p.m . and all Co1111111ssiuner's
pre,ic-u1/, pri>~ nt" re pr~, nt a:,.,r Ihe hr ak
II
\',. 6 ~,11? me \o?d \'r. ':J:or Cc• ,c.-CC"de .. iHE DISCL S5tt1, o, C-\SE =Z 0,21 08-C 1 oe, \ER '-E\l',.,,_R\ Pl..-\,,ED L'IT DE\Eu)P'-IE,T -\.\lhD\1E,T .! SE CO, Tt,L (D TO THE \1-\RCH 18. 2008 \\EETt,G OF fHE PL-\' '"G -\.,o zo",c CO\\\US5iO, -\ i ES i\ .. , s ASST -\I,.
ASSE, T
Bnc~ l\noth, Roir. t...neger King Bleile. Calonde• Fish ,one
,one
\\'el~er
1\lotion carried.
IV. PUB lit lQ!!.!!.hl
There was no, ,e pre·en, IQ address the Co~1mission.
V. ELECTION OF OFF ICERS
Mr. Brick moved :
t-Is. Krieger seconded: TO ELECT MR. BRIA\J BLEILE AS CHA IR AND MR. CHAD
K:--OiH AS VICE CHAIR
AYES :
/\.,,_VS :
Brick, Knoth, Roth. Kneger, King, Bleile. Calonder. Fish
None
ABSTAt,.
ABSE ,T:
None
Welker
/I.lotion c~rried.
VI. DIRECTO R'S CHOICE
Oirec:or \\'hite had nothing ior the Commission.
\Ill. STAFF'S CHOICE
1-1, L,1ngon stated the ne~t meetmi,: ',\Ill be \IJrch 18. 2008. It "'II be a conimuat,on or
Case zo, 2008-0 I , and Puhhc Hearings for Cases 2ooa.c~. Publicauon of Public Notices
on t~ Web and wo·-05, ,, \,nimu111 Lot Frontage. Ir thf Pubhc I leanngs are comple1ed at
the I\ \Jrch 18~ meetin g. the Apr,I a• meeting \\Ill be a discussion on the Smal l Area Plan. Ii
the hearu1i;s ar~ con tinued, the Small A,ea Plan will be mo.,ed to the following meeting. In
the fu tur~ there "ill be a dis cussion on prnposed UDC housekeep ing amendmen ts.
VIII. ATTORNEY'S CHOICE
Mr. 81 otzm.in hJd not"in~ for the Cor.1m,s,1on.
•
•
\Ir. Bleile In,1n~ed 1t•e Comm, ,,on ror 1he nonunJlion. Chair RJlh corgr.1Iu1.1:ed \Ir Sle,:c on 1.,, appomtmefll ar.d \\e1c,11cd \Ir t..,r;.
The meeung adjourned JI 10:10 p., .
•
•
13
•
•
cm o r E\GLE\\000 l'L-\,,'\I\G .\',O ZO\I\G CO \l,\11 10 , \larth 111 , 2tJU 8 I. C .\ll TO ORDER T'1c •,;·1:..,.11 ",. •N 1 ::-l" l•I\ P .11m. 11 .r'?d Zo ,~~ Comr.•r;,1011 .,J, c.1llt>rf 10 orc:.-r ,11 ;;o; p.01. 11 lh! C11, Co~nt:il Ch.m1h .. •< ·,,1 1r "' E, g·e~,ood Cr.re Cl"ntt'r, \ icoe Ch.m l-..10Ih pr,; rdm'.!
S1.,ri 1\IJ n v\ hue. b,recror, C Jmmuniry De,e lo pment
Trrcia LJng on S<!nior r ·Jnner
:S:Jncy Reid. 1\5,i ·tant C11, Allurne~
II. APPROVAL OF MIi.JUTE
i\-lJrch -!, 20011
,\ Ir . Fish "10\.tJd :
\r Calender s~conded : TO APPRO\. ETHE MARCH.., 200 3 \11\UT E"
\. rce ChJir Knoth J ked 11 the re 1, ere Jm modmca ion or correc tion •
11,tr frsh mo\ed:
Mr Calonder s~ondt!d : TO AME.\O THE ,',,\ARCH 4, ~008 \II\GTE -\S FOLLOWS .
AYl
i'--\YS .
AS TAI\
ASSE1'1T
I. On pJge 2 che las e sen <'nee 01 i;aragraph 2 should read
Em elo pe 3 not En,elope 2
Brr c' . Kno th. Rot h. ~.neg er, Fish . C.,lond er. Ising
\;one
\on<!
f" ~rl ,;, \\elk tr
Ill. PUB LI C HEARI\/G
Con unuatr on 01 Cas µ #ZO,~008-0 1
Denve r SeminJry PIJ nn d Un11 Oe,elopnient Am<!ndmenl ~
Vice ChJu Kn ot h sI.it;;d the is sue before the Comm iss ,on rs 1he conrinu~tron or C.He
#ZON2008 -0I , D,mve • Seminary Pl.111n d Uni: De,clopmenr Am endme111 2.
\': F .. ~ 1,h \~d \ \f 6 ,C \ •<'c "Ct'C '\ ~ ASS-;".\,, \SSE, -',flt' 'll'C B et!c \\ -,,l<!r
i\\r Fi,'.• mo\ed:
"-h i..-,e~•·' ,.:conc!.,d.
-, l ,_!', \L! C \~E ==• ,~-, :-' Dh, ~, '.-c\'-' \J:: 0 ~.\' ,ml,:-c~•E'. E. ,)F'.'E' T ,\ \\c,o,1E, ~ :
C.\SE ~ZOl\2008-01 DE,I.ER SE\\1:-..\R, Pl->,,MO u,!T
DEVELOP,\IE, r A\IE '-D1,1E, T 2 AS PROPOSED, BE
RECQ,\\1,\Ei\DED FOR APPR0 11AL TO on COUi\CIL ~\ 1TH
.\ FWORASLE RECO,\I\IE~.DATIOi\ FOK ADOPTIOi\,
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS THAT MIGHT BE IMPOSED
BY THE COMM ISSION DURING THIS HEARING .
Mr. Fish sn1d he \\Jnted to separJte out the four conditi ons StJii ,uggested in the St,lii
Report. He stated he did not h,1,e any problems with th e first co11dit io1,. He ieh it ~.11 a
,alid condition.
,\Ir F1>h mo\ ed:
Ms. f..rieg~r seconc!~c!: THE FIJ;:ST CO'-DITIO ' GE ACCEPTED AS WRITTE~.
AHS
'·"S -ABST->,t,:
l-.no1h Roth, f..m~. Kne3er, Calender, Brick, Fish
,one
'-one
ABSE,T: Bleile, Wel~e:
""11011 ca,ried.
/\\r foh stJt• d Conc111on ~ as put ionh by StJ1t, adno"led!!ed 1he need for nexible
dt,e!opm,•nt option, b, establi,hin~ thret? de\elopmem em elopes and techric,11 site plan
'"""'•' oi dt!wlopn1ent '"thin ,.11d envelopes shall be b~ the De,elopment Re"e,, Te.1m
1or compliance \\llh PUD and C,t; dt,elopment standards. He a,ked the: Comm1,,ion 11
thev telt 1h,1t \\ as JCCt!ptJblt!. His posr rion is 1hat th,, t,1kes an~-further dt!H·1•1pment and
p!Jn, out oi 1he public domJin and out of any r-"" process <'\Cepl 1he dc:e1s1o n procP,,
\\-llh C•ty Council. He i, uncom1-1rtable '"th that
•
Mr. Brick concurrl!d. Ht! staled wha1 he h~ard irom the public was that 1hey 1,a1necl
Planning ,ind Zoning 10 co111inue to be included r the process. He sa id he fe lt i1 is 111 the
ge11t!ral 11 el fore of the publi1. to be ab le to hJve in1,u 1 as changes occur. Ht! sa id he would
like to ,~e the fo\e month turn ar·•l•nd time reduced . He asked 1he Chair IL possibly •
con,iclt!r tht' Comm1s,1CJn a tinw :, look ,1t that resnun;e time ~nrl sec> if ii can he
•
•
CITY OF E\GLE\\OOO Pl~\ \J\G ~\O 7O\1\G CO\IMISSIO\ \l.mh 18, !00!l I. C"LL TO ORDER The ,e~ulM nie,;11113 0 1 th,; Cit\ Pl,11111111~ ,l''d Z,)mng C, 1'l111m,io11 •,1 J> ,Jllt:'d 1,1 arcl;?r .11 ":ll5 p.m. 111 the Cit, Cou11c1I Ch,11,1b~r, 01 the Engle"oocl L,,11 (emt>r \,ice Ch.11r t,_noth pre11d111g.
St II: Alan Vvhue, D1tl!Ctor Commumt~ Oe,elopment
Tricia Langon . Ser•or Planner
Nancy Reid. \,11s: nt C,111 "-t1orne1
II. APPROVAL OF MIII.UTrS
MJrCh -1, 2008
Mr foh mo,ed:
,\Ir Calonder seconded· TO "PPRO\.E THE M"-RCH J 1008 ,\11\L'TES
\ •~e Chair 1-.norh asked it there 1, ere Jn} moditicJtions or correcllon,.
Mr F,sh m01ed:
Mr (alonder seconded· TO .\.\IIE\D THE MARCH -1 2008 MI\LJTES .\S FOLLO\\ S.
I . On pJge 2 the l~st sentence ol paragraph 2 should read
Em elope 3. nor Em elope 2.
AVES.
1'.AYS
ABST.\IN:
Brick, Knoth, Roth, lo.rieger, foh, Calonder, King
None
1\one
ABSE\ T: 81eile, \\e!~er
1\1\01,nn carried.
111. fg_ .IC HEARl,,G
Co-,1,nua1,on of (JSe liZO,1008-01
Den,er Seminary PIJnned Umr De1elopment Amendmen• 1
Vice Chair Knoth slated the iSSL1e before the Com111b11or• i, the ..:on11nuat1on oi Case
#20,\2008-0 1, C,.'nver Sen11nJr\ Pbnnetl Un it De,elopment Allll!ndment 2.
•
•
., 4 ( ·{!·"'..-• he' ..... 11<! .1 .. l ···e ·"'ll ,,r l .... , ( 'l.l:'"' ,;.a, r J ... \~ :_,.~ '-•1~mt.r~u-. l,,t. ,\ ,r::-; t'-c ~.: e J ,, · ,,: iJ" t<.._. 1 .. r:~.•) l J.-•"C • .l:"1,., 1J c "'Jn .:-::!ii J. ~ r."':..?dt" ' ... ~ C r·m ,~,, n h.h U~J.'~?. \lr (J • r,!~, J:)~~d 1i tf"'~!)O'.!!I:,; tr:..-1 t\;..'c er r~~t:Ic10n o n ct~\ttl\.)pm~ru 1~,1i;.1r.tiz~:-, .. t:'ir ru1J•'"u,1 Jrnii:, to n1J1:'t .. 1111 Jnd >LJ'!-:J1"" 1r,,· t\ pt: or del11\ \b 1':"1t'µ•• .. ~.1,d \.e-,. ,\Ir F1-,h .w~ ·d .111t! pro,1,!.,d .1cc:11,011.1I \\Ordin~ ror Co11d i1,on 2· In .cc!i:,cm Commun ,I1 De,elopm11<11 "ill pro1 ,de mon 1!,i, upd,11es 10 the PIJnnrng .inc. Zoning Cornm1»ion un s,gn irr,Jn r decision, I,.~. pruposed bu ,ldu1g rootprint;
.ind ~Ize. propt,sed use, etc.I. The Plannmg ard Zonmg Comm1ss1011 ma, require J
puolic heJnng proct!,; ror public mput. Pl,1nnmit ,ind Zoning Commi,,;on
recommendai,on, and appro, al b, Cu·. Cou~cil or a PL·D ~mendm.,nt ,i Sv
de,;r~d-
That allo" s rhe de\ e'oper 10 go 1hro1,;gh the de,elopment process. mo, e ror., ard and
ch.inge rhrngs appropna1el, but keej), the Planning and 201110g Co01m1»ion in rhe loop.
Mr. Knoth s1c11ed rhe Commi,;ion has ,mposed iair1v right restrictions on rhe de, elopmenr
and does not feel g•,in~ them a lt1ile I1:!ew,w in where they c,111 build and where rh e
ioo1pri n1 <>, is our oi the que,rion.
\h f..rieg~r ag•eed "ith \Ir. l\norh In g~neral. in a Pl'D you h;i,e a bu,lcling em elope and
;ou can build onl, in a cer:arn ,irea .ind ha,P guidelines vou 01u;I iollo"
\Ir foh said "e ha,e an ar.J ,~at \\e 6>t!ntial:v ha,e lhro"n a•.,av all t::e zoning
requirements for. Ms. l\neger disagreed. She said the Commission has cr11Jted new zoning
requ,rem~'lu ior the PUD. ,\Ii. Fish ;aid he is not proposing the developer come to pubiic
hearing all the 1,me. rhe addiuonJI \\Ording gI,es rhe Commission a chance to review the
progress and ii the Comm,ssion sees a problem to c!o somerhrng about it. Ms. l\rieger said
the de,eloper is not going 10 ha,e any progress unt,I the1 come beiore the buiiding
departmen t wi th fi nished plans and that Is the ,-rong time to be relling so,nebodv 1h a1
rhey've gor to go bac~ and spe11d tens oi thousand s oi doll.m redesign ing a built.ling
because "e don't like ti. Mr. foil s,11d e, ervone 1hJ1 caries 10 rhe Commun,ry
De, elopmenr Depanmenr 10 build something mus t subm11 ,1 plan. Ms Krieger sa id rhev
submit a plan that rrt, \\tthin the requirements. \\e alread\ hJse the requirements for th,,
project a~d the, should hJ\I! tlie s.101e rigr.t, as e,~ryone el;e. One.-\,e h,1,e S"en the
de,eloper rhe bas,c requiri:ml!nls for rheir zcne rhe\ shoulc ha,e I",,; rr~lir to come ror,,ard
"rth sorr,i:rhing that ftr; \,ithin tho,., r~quir,:m,:,i:s tha: "tr,: g ,en 10 t~,em and hJ,e a
reJsonab.e assura'lCe rhat ii r; goin~ I·> bt' ,1ppro,ed Mr. foh JJr~,;d, bul all Puo·s hJ\e 10
go through a public process . don'I 1h.:1 I \h t-:r.eger said r~is r, tn • public pro.;e,s. Mr Fish
s,id aren·t "e abdiCJlin~ thar rr 6h1' ,\Is l\neger said no. "e are SJy111g ,is long a, the
de, eloper meets rhe requirements alread~ appro, ec! t~at is tIPe . ,\ Ir F,sh sa,d he f Pels the
requirements are too hro.1d and rhere·, too much po1entiJI iur somerhing t..i go "rong. The
original site plan has been completely chJ r1g~d .
,\\r Ki ng said righ 1 nQ'.•. the d11,elop,,, ha s an appro,ed PUD and the, could hwild 10 I i9
It'd. H~ s.1icf he is gu.,;;u1~ 111., d-·. ,•I, 1 ,..r r, rnm1113 lo the Cr,nim1; ,ion 1,1 a1k f,,, he'n dee
3
I•~ m.1 1 1\~• d,., "-.?.•• ..• 1, ! 11 •J."\ nr 1.._~~t"i-.. +J ,\ rn tit' c,1.:imi pIJ•1. Otl\..lU ... ~ 111,11 h I'"t: 0111" , ... c,11..~ 1,·, • h ~ J J:id 1, ·.11-♦ .. d ,\~ ,\1 u 1i c, .. ,1::,~..; .-.tth J proJ.:Ll 1:l.1~ 1, 1,.'! r uu11 ~1:1d lu,~k-11jll . "'t:·i·•,1~ j·,.· I, ·•!t.• l;1.:ipt.:r I!-., ... ~.r,.:, h.)r J '1~ilt! I,.~,~ h) mJlt.l II .. ,., \ot'•nh,.I Ht• d1.t"''' t .. ~t.' tr"Jt ... ~.lt t:•,·, Jr~ J. ... ~in~ ,s :rJ: r::~uch d1::~rt:'f"lf in "~P.:ht Jnd ht;.1' pl.1 •t• 11,.,,. \\f.tll ,,,h ;1re,1ou-:-.\ ,,. ~ ~)•,,..,, ,\Ir. F1,h ,J1d 1~.11 i, Mt the i,;ue. The 1s,ve •~ remu,n'f publ11: pro1..t:,, Commi,;ion '"'""" and Coundl apprc,.1! Tha:, \\h,ll Cond1:1on ! coe> \tr t-.ing J,l...;d u 1ht>1c ""'" dt>ri,111.-p!Jn, pre"ou,:, \Ir F,sh ,J1d l~t!rc \\ere preose plans that sco"ed \\here tre bu1ld111:,!,
\H!re going to be. \t, Krieger said 1n A:ne~dment I 1,e 101ed to gi,e the de,efoper an
emel,,pe ior tre 1alle,: building. ,\tr. Fish said 11 \\Jsn tan en,elope, bul a iootpnnl. He ,J1d
the emelr,pe concep1 is ne11 to .~mendme,,. ~ ,\15. Krieger noted at 1he hearing tor
Amenclrne~t I 1he dt>,doper s1,1tecl th.,, had no ideJ ,,hat thJt building "ould look lile:
the} JUSt hJd an are,1 thev could build 1n.
,\Ir. t-.noth asked II am o i the other Comrn1,,1oners had a mouon 1he1 "Ol1h.l li~e 10 ma~e
10 Condition 2. There "ere none.
Mr. Fish s,11d he belie, t'> the PUD pro..:e;s \\ithin 1tseli, is a process designed 10 b.isically
loosen up Jnd in some CJ;e ; comp letely el11n ina1e zon ing rest:ic1 ions. Because of that, the
restrict ion~ pl,1 ced 0 11 the de1 eloper. i1 rhe Commission gi1 es them leeway. "hich we ha1 e,
,-ill then require a ri8orous proce,s.
Mr. Fish moved:
Mr Brick ,econdecL
Bri~k. F1,,
THE SECOi\D COi\DITJO;, BE ACCEPTED \.\.ITH THE
FOLLOWING CO:--.DITlO'1 ADDED TO WHAT snFF
RECOMME,OS:
I. In addition, Communitv De,elopment \\ill pro,ide
monthly updates to the Planning and Zoning
Commission on signiticant decisions (i.e. proposed
building footprints and size. proposed usc,s, etc.). The
Planning and Zoning Comm1>sion m,w requirt.' a public
ht'anng process ior public input, Planning and Zoning
Commission recomwenda11ons. and approval by City
Cl•uncil.
AYES
"-A)5
ABSTAI,.
ABsE,r
l\noth. R1J1h. !..in ~, l..rieger, Calondt:!r
Non~
Bleile. \ \ el~~r
t IQh0n foiled.
•
•
•
•
-I J P 1\ t Ctl J l-;'°ll l ~ Es-•.nl!~r-'E[') El', /1E ,, , .... , -, DE'. [t1)P ,1E r QEP\, r, .,r ,~ .\1 ·1,E ... :~ rh.:;: -"r.: .... ~":· CJ 'rtt, , ... 6 I . F ,h ,s,-," ,, l:' \B5E, 6 ►"' fl" \,• e•
\lot,on c.wic,•
\Ir foh rt'Jd Condi11 on 3 '"~ -lllnlt'nd.,d b, -IJII. II s .1 es: That En,1:lope 2 ,hall be linutcd
to u,e, perm,ut-d in 1 ,. "Hoi.,ehild L111nl\ CJlegor, oi 1he PLO, T •. ole 01 -\!101,ed Ls
He sugge,ted adding lht! \\0rd,ng ... \\H the e,cep1ion tha1 \ 1s1 ur Accommodatior . B~d
and Breaki.1 1 be remo1,ed a, an al!o" ed use . He ,1a1ed 111 Amendmeni I there wen! l\v0
add111onal comm r~1al u ·es p rn111 ed ... ho1,i use and beef and brPJkra,t u,t'. He said neither
1he en t Village representJtl\e nor I want 10 see a bed and break1a,1 in Emclope 2.
i\ls. R11id stJled. from her rt'colh,c11011, th,11 'Household li'lng" does not include beef and
breakfast . It is already e,cluded. She informed the Comm ission 1ha1 e1,en though the
hearing 1, closed the, .:ould ask Staff io r clJriiication. Mr . Calonder asked Staff 10 pru1ide
clariiica1ion .
\ts. Langon approached the pod1uni e stared on the first pal\e oi the PUD under the
Tab!e 01 Allo"ed Uses th~re are 1ariou, ca;egories. Under "Rl'Siden11JI Uses" the second
categol)' 1, "Hou,ehc Id L.-lng •. There are se en uses listed and iour oi those uses are
perm11 ed. Abou1 l\vo-third, 01 the "ay do"n thP second column under "Commercial Use •
1s the "Visi tor Accommodations cate!10r\ Visitor Accomm odations includes bed and
break1as1 and hotel. A, \H1t1en . ire use, ·in Em-e lo pe ~ shall be limited 10 uses pernuntld in
the Household l1\1ng categor oi the Table oi -\llo,\ed Uses. Bed and breakiast and hc,.1el
is no: listed under "Hou,eliold Li1111g·. As \H1t1en there "ould be no commercial use ""Lin
En\elope 2
\Ir Calonder mo\ ed:
\Is. ne,~r ..condec TO -\PPRO\ E co,omo, J AS \\'RITTE,
.,_.,,E.
'A)S. ssr ... ,,
1,.noth, Roth, Km~ 1,.ne~er C.1 h nrler Srid F,-h
!',one
011'1
.-\SSE, T Ble ile, \\elk~·
,\1011on cwied.
t\lr Fi,h read StJii's recomm ndJ ion for Condition 4. He sug~estecl accepting the
co11dit1011 a~ "rltten 1\lth thee cep1io11 oi rt11110\ ing hote l use from Emelnµe 3.
1 r ... ~, ... ,\ r!. \1" S \, 't'l f"!t;1 c! () -\i'l'RO\E (()'\:JJ-o, -l \J;H THE f1)lll \\:,c ui,ono · tr F ,,. ,1,d l·J ere r. r;,,, ,cle er ire de\ei pmer.I, .i ·em!enual zor,e Ji c! "" ,oult! 1,ke :o ,et.> a: J rni111r.1um n11,,11-ur,11 hui;,,r~ c:ie:e and nm c ,mrne!crJI u,e -\:,o. ont.> or thi! I ,h,> ior t~e par' u•g rec;u1rem,m1, \\JS that ~,ert' \\J; to be ;hared p.irling l\lth the hold ,1nd 1i1r
re ,111 space He s.1,d he do ,n 1 ·e.i 1,h •e trere 1s re'J1l ,p,,ce info el• Jlt! 3 to bt.> ,hJrt-d
and r t.>1, comme·c,al use ,s simply nor appr vpna ce there because u Is do e 10 rhe R I -\
res1c!e•1t1JI zone It poh:'11trJII\ creare~ parking ,mies 1, ich the cummt PUD siatement th,11
1he1 are rt'(Ju1red to rJ1 e only .5 par~in~ space, per hotel ro um.
Mr. f-ing said 11 1s In the best interest o r rhe de\eloper 10 study rhe parking \l:!ry careiull~
since 1he re is no ou1s1de parking . Ii rhe y don t hJve enough parking It will be a deal killer
for a lot oi lhings .
,\Ir. Ro th said w/ien Ihe Commission origin.iii\ approved rhe de1elopmen1 rhe building
height, and posi11ons 1vere ,el. now they are not. One of the possibilities he heard
menI1oned 1,1as 1hat "" could end up wirh rhe 101,er in Em elope 3 and not in En\elop e I.
1,hich would be rhe \\0rst case scenJrio for the reside~ts. He would like to see a stipulation
on height in Envelope J He suggested adding horel use back Into Envelope 3. He
sugge;red the building In Em,elope 3 be r, higher rhan 29 ieer abo~e the ele\ arion of the
hi hesr strucrure In Em elope 1 B. Mr Fish agreed, but reh thar issue should be J separate
condition.
/>. r f,,h ,~p aied his mu11on tor the Commission.
Ir 11.noth called ior a 1ot11.
-\\ES :
, -\YS :
Roth. liing. Kri11:;e, Calender, Brick Fish
noth
ABST-\1\
AiW',T
'son,.
Bl ilt \\ e!~er
o\lr. fo!' r10,~d:
Ir 11.ing s~concJed· THAT THE E~, \ ELOPE 3 BULK PL-\, E BE MODIFIED TO A
,\\.-\\I;,IU,\I HEIGHT OF 150 FEET ANO TO 21 FEET ABOVE
GRADE TO 60 FEET I\J FROM TH E NORTH El'.\ :I.OPE EDGE
A:--.0 25 FEET FROM THE EAST EDGE.
•
Mr. Fi,h SJ1d II you l,>o~ at 1h bul~ plJne on page 4 of rhe PUO , ba,icall\' on Ihe northta!rn •
~cl:;e 111 3 • f.:e1 from th selbJc~ \ ou can consrruct a builchng up 10 21 feet. You can rhe,,
o in .1111 Iher 50 H,1 a•1d llfl t , I 7q le"I. On Ih eJ,I edge Ihe current plan ho\,, 1h
6
•
•
,,)b,Kkt: n l.!J11d~I ,., •. : 1rc-·~1:··,, c,ing,• ur,~I kc>! nJ(~~i1r~1111 ·pt 1·1 :·t.:~ Ht."' ,. .. ,.!,. I 1• (1 mm, .. I "" ,~ Jlk\\11.'.! J :rer.~e"Cfli..;, ln~:'t.!' .. ht:' IJ1 c~n)1(',, Jnd t,;J!''1f~ fL11l,t:.1~1 n m r, ... Jr~t .1··d \'.~ t•,-11~ : h:"'-C~C :h, .. ~t'I t-J(.;r~~ l. a, nti..;("l ,1, p, ,;, · • ~I· ,110 fi.-d I' n 1 .,.l'it 10 ,::i dc•,e'Lpme:11 Jnd be:1.-,e, th, pr ,:C: 1> J •tJI .,,,.,1 :o E ,"" but,, ... , 1. ~ Cu, n ·-c!• :o bo> ,e-:,1:r.e 10 1 .,i nort. er ne1ghho1"ood t!•Jt ~Js neen ,mpal:t!d J: J r,~h ,e \Ir Sr!l~ su~·;i:,rt!d ,v'! ... ,·,: J cor.c,uon l~J: ,:.ik> an bL1ldi.,~; c e• 15 '""' n11 ... 1 b ..
I, (.l!<!d Ill th ' uti ~ n on~tr,•d I Ir!! propt'rJ .•
,\Ir, Fish s,1,d 1ou "()uld 1h11n ra,,e the hergh1 in En e!ope 1 bLt that \\Ould be a sep.irate
cond,11011. He " uld li~e to set! high fi,:,lc'i..,gs 101 he alk>"ed ne,1 tr the norther,
pro,:-'!11, Mr l\mg ,J1d II the de\eloper pu ,1: ti~ r ,, ler1t1,1I ,, 1-:e a:·.,,•,ed in Ei,elope 3
111 thJt 66.000 square foot en elope, space 'i1111.,;,c,,,, \\Ould hm11 the Luilding tc IO ,:unes
tJII. J\lr , foh said In aodi11on to the bulk plane the c!e\e loper car extend bJlcon,es out
ano ther eight ree t to the north be} oncl the bL l plane . Ir ~.ir,~ asked J\lr. Fish II he \1 a,
trying to eliminate the shadm,ing from the b,1:conies. He\, :·r.·" was. r-1;, Krieger s,11d
those balco,,,es w ,uld not e~tenc! the shaclul', ·,. h~h c! • .lJrr,
,\Ir. Fish a3J in re~d his motion .
A\ES :
-\YS ·
ABSTAl1'
AB5E'-T:
lot,on fail;,d.
Fish
Knoth, Rotr. Kin~ r•Pger .::alonder
Bric~
R:e,Je. \\ eler
,\Ir Brick mo~ed·
THAT All SUILOl'-GS ASO\ E 1 SO FEET SE 1, THE
sou-HER, o,E-THIW OF TH!: P~OPERn
,\ h li:'.1e'.ter s:ated the Commi;,1011 CJ'"lCt do that. The he,gh rest'.1Ct1on, a,e alread\ 111
p1,1ce and t'ie onl~ place \ ou ca'.'! ha, e a bwld,ng h,g:,e~ t~an 150 ieet ,s ,n En\ elop.: J
I\ here tht hi!, •ht rt!>1ric•1on 1s I ·o feet
i\ 10110n died tor l.ic~ ot e::unc!,
THE DORMEF' .PECIFICATIO ,'-IS NEGOTIATED 1:-,., GO D
f.'IITH \\IT ~I l\t'\ T \ IL LAGE HO,\.ltU\\ ,eRS AS·~O(IATlu,
r\ Is Reid s1,1ted that tht CII) cannot enforce pr,vat~ negotiJtions . She suggested lhe
Commiss ion require the cle1<:!1oper and f..e111 Village Homeo\1ners Association to h>lve
good foitfi negotiations ar.d nothm\; more
"r. J:,!'h .•. th .~ ....... , h, .. r.,,,111. 11 He ... c-J 1l·.l l ll th-., ... :!• ":r,l l'.:'LOrt.! :11.u th .. • ("'l riin11,~i• ., ~,Qt.,.. t,~~ tr,~ 1,,,rn~) M ,,~\!utl.~t~ II~ ~-'1Jd :.w h f "f\ :u rt: .. ,JJ·. e :!"'e dorm\!!" ~Pt~Clll\..111(.f'l~. \Ir f.,h mu 11••l , Ir 6nck ,e~<>nded: Th\i FOR HOTEL P-\R,_,,c THERE BE -\T cE-\ST THREi: P-\Rl\1,c SP-\CES l'ER Fl\ E 5 Roo,,s R-\THER TH.-\~ T-<E .5 PER ROO, I CL RRE, -._, REQL E5TED \Is k1eger ,.11d ,he belo,1, e, 1he currenr pJr\ing i;, ,1.i:ic1ent ,1; .,_ \Ir 11.,ns ,l\\Jin ~ot~ that
he ,eds tt ,s a dl!al kil!er i.,r th! pro1ec1 10 :101 be sure there is suint1ent par,mg on s,te
,ince 1here is no 01~er plJc,1 to park. 11 1, In the besi interest oi the de,eloper 10 pro\lde
ampi.• par~ins reg.udles, 01 \\hat tl>e C11v code ma, be. i\ls. 11.rieger said 1he ieel, 11 the
de, eloper need, to Jdju,1 the p,,rkrns as the projec1 proceed,. 1he, "ill do ,o.
Fish AHS.
,,-\YS.
ABSTi>.I·,
ABSE' T:
Kno th. Roth, 1,;ing, Kriege,, Calonder, Brick
None
Bleile, \v~lk~r
.-.101ion foiled.
Mr l\noth J,ked Ir anvonc elsti h,1d a comment.
Mr. ~ing sa,d he is a l111le concerned "ith the dormers on the west property line. i\lr. F,st,
stated there are speci1ica1ions regardrng the dormers. Mr. King sa id he would like 10 hmll
the dormers to a certa in square foo1age.
Ms. 11.neger ,J1d (or the record she \,ould like to see Citv Council look a1 1he dormer issue
and see \\hJI k•nd f progress has been made and take tha1 into account \\hen they are
ho1tiing thw hearing. Hnpefulh, by tha1 trmt! Kent \"illage and the de,eloper will hJ,e
c, to JO agreemenl
; .. , Roth mo,ed:
,, tr Fish secon1tt!d: THE BUILDl'-G HEIGHl -.; EWELOPE 3 SH,-\LL BE ,o
MORE TH-\:-,! 29 FEET AB<JVE THE T-\LLEST BUILDl:--!G IN
E:--.\HOPE 1B
•
,\Ir. Roth sJ1d 1he current mJ,imum height, ior each emelope would r~main. Mr, Ftsh
,1aIed ii Em ~lope J I, bu1'1 firsi 1h,11 then requires the d.,,eloper to bu ild a higher building
,n Envelope I B. Mr. Roth >lated thal " correct. i\lr. Roth said the de, eloper would be
rrquoret.l 10 build 111 Em elope I B itrs· Mr. Fish s,iicl 1hat is nor pan of the condition. Ms
Krieger sl,ited II is by d~fouh, Ms, f..rie~er said "hat i\lr. Roth proposes is ,f you d1d1 1'1 ha\e
J building In I S you could nc1 teli how high you could build in En, elope J. Mr. Fish said II
may crea1e conntcting Issues w11h 01he r items on 1he PUD such as ma~imum size and
number oi u1111s. Ms. Krieger s,1ld she agreed and it could make thing, e,tremely driiicul1. •
,\Ir, f..11oth a~~ed Mr. Roth to ple,1>e re>1aIe his motion . HI.' did so .
s
' \\r R 11n ,~,11,; nt. \Jt~lt' ~ :i, mJk~ surtt th e Comm1~:1<1n .,.:p~~ not mc.fLdc wi:•~,. • \t::., Ul I B 1:1 order 10 bt.1ld a h1i·er ,:rut1wr,t in E,1, elope 3 ,,,. Reid Jsl.ed \\, LJn>1?n II tne•~ i, a c•~m1cJ :10~ or cc·1~,;Ion ior u,<!lul ;lrudu" ,·,u, decorau,e. \Is Lanl?On s1a1ed 1here are ceun.:ion-; \\ll:im 1~e PLO 11,eli 1or the he1gh1 01 the huildm~ and ,, hat can go abo, e. She ;aid ;ne belie!, e, 11 ·s "•nten m tne PUO that e, e') thing has to
be \\Uhm the se1 heigh1 or 1he em elope. \Is Roth s,1id he understands thal, but \\,11,r; to
pre,ent the de,eloper from cons:rucung a three story s:ructure with an 80 foot IO\\Jr so
1he, CJn build a 14 sto"' building in Envelope 3. In order to do that Ms Langon said ,at.
\\Ould need 10 define tO\,er and e,er\thing else '"thin the Pl.JD.
Ms. Reid asked the Commission ii thev \\Ould hke 10 rake a break in order 10 look at rhe
Ordinance. Before doing that Mr. Fish asked ii 1here was a consensus on the Commissic,n
10 appro,e. Mr. Knoth called for a ,ate and said ii appro,ed the Commis,io11 will take a
bredk to allow Staff to ha, e lime 10 looJ.. at the word ing.
AYES :
NAYS:
AB 5TAl1':
AtlSE:--.T.
Morion failed .
Brick, Ro1h
Knoth , King, Krieger, Calonder, F,sh
None
Bleile, \ \'elker
Mr. Rorh asked •)ie C ,mrn1ssion ii an1 ont-had an alternalive solu1ion ,,, i~ rhe Co'Tin11ssion
going 10 let 11 go as is.
Mr. Brod sa,d "hat he heard is :ha1 1he Commission "ould like 10 see 1!,e de,elopme,1t go
in 1ha1 dire,;uon. buI does nor wan1 to legislate II that wav. For the recoro he \\Ould ask that
Cny Cou 'JO~ al 1h1s issue
/\ Ir Knoth , ,.ed 1i the Commission hJd an11hmg iurther.
Ms lvieger \\anled 10 comment on ho" much she apprecia ted /\I,. Fish·s 1houg!i1iuln~,,
and d1scuss1on during 1omsh1, hearing
Mr Fish mo, ed:
Ms Kneger sec on, !t>d: CASE #20 S:2008-0 I, OE'IVER ~E.\11'--\RY PlA1'"EO U\o lT
DEVELOPMEI\ T AME\.D,\IE1' T 2 AS PROPOSED, BE
RECO,\IME:-JOED FOR APPROV'\L TO CITY COU,'-CIL WITH
A FAVOR,\BLE RECOMMEND'\TIO'-FOR AOOPTIO'I,
S'JBJECT TO THE FOLLOW ING APPROVED
CONDITIONS :
9
AYES
NWS:
ABST"I'
ABSE,T.
.\;J ~WPf ·• eJ c rc1110P:t a:1C r~qL;1·~m~nh t:-,:.,hri .. ,~J u-<'~' t~t! O<!n.e· S-,nur.11\ PL D ,tnd Ot!"'"' S~m1~.1r, !'LO· "·~l~"'tfmt.u"'• I ".-·Jil .::pp\ uru:Si Jmt:•it.icd 0\ .\meri..mvq• ~ , .._mendment 2 acbo" !edge; Ihe need ior ij,,"ble de•.~ ~pme1I opIIors b, e,:abiish111g 1h1ee 3 de,elopmen1 en,elope;. Technical Slli! pIJn re"e" or de,elop•11.:n1 ,,uhm sa,d en, elopes shall be b, tre De, elopmen1 Re\lew Team re, ie\\ ior compiiance '"th PUD and City de, dopmenl
standards.
3. En-elope 1 shall be limiIed 10 uses perm111ed in the
·rou)ehold !i,ing" raIegor, oi 1h e PUD'; Table oi Allo,,ed
Uses.
4. Hore! Use shall be li mited as follows:
a. Hore! use shall be locaIed w 1Ihin Envelop" 1
o nlv.
b. Hole, ,se shall not be a separate, s1and-alone
use.
c. The maximum number of ho1el rooms shall be
150.
d. II hole! u,e Is appro,ed, the following guPst
accommodation allo,·,ance appro, ed in the
original PUD shall be amended 10:
"3. The number oi residential unit, does
nor include proposed guesI
accommoda1ion ior gue, .s of esidenls of
1he proIec1. Such spaces shall nol e~ceed
900 SF. a11d no more lhan l¼0 such
,paces per ~rial roodorniorum
~ e~i!dmg 'I~ w1alI shall be
pro,icled."
Knoth, RoIh, King, t-n-3<:!r, Calender
Brick, Fi,h
i':one
Bl~ile, Welker
r,.1 0I1011 carried.
M, Brick ,oted no bec?use he do~s 101 like seeing Ihe project goh1g out of the process of
Pl,1nnl11g and Zoning «!vie\\ing changes . He is in favor of Ihe proje~I and believes ii i s
going 10 be excellent ior Engle,,ood, J,uI feels all changes need 10 be brou11ht before the
Comm,,;,on. He feels the '"" monrh rt.:'. i!?\\ time i; e~ces;Ive and nted, tJ be loo~ed at.
10
,
Hi: b,!11-,1~, 11 1, ro1 111 th.: ~~·•e•·J: '.11:ir.ire, r l>'e c•nv unil' Ill 1101 r.11,; P!J1111111•~ Jr.d • :,)111~g 111cIucled In 1he •,».,._..,\ prJ,e».
•
•
'-lr. Roth ,,Jh!C -\rr.enc:m"•·• l ,, m cont, rm,m<.e \\1ln the D1,:·1<.: P\,1n rec;u1r~mt'nt, and do-:s noI altt'r !ht' C mpr,;hen,11 e Plan tor H0usi11g. C uhurJI .\rt, Jnd Bos1•1e,, and Em ployment 1den111ied In 1he original PL D. -\II 1he appropri.1Ie documen1s concerning -\mendment 2 10 this po1111 hJ•.e been rect'11 ed. As the pmject proceed, all tinure documents and drJ\\ing; 111/1 be re,ie"ed ior the C11v·s de1elopmen1 sland.ird, b, the De,elopme111 Re'1ew Team . .\mendmen1 2 O1>1ric1 Plan remains consistent 1111h the
accepted de1elopmen1 ,1Jndards es:Jblished hy 1he Cit\-or Engle\\ood. Ame'ldme'll 2
coniorms 10 all other OrdonJ'ICes and la\\S and requrremen1s oi the Col\.
IV. PUBLIC HEARIN G
Case # 2008-0~
Publi c Notice Amendments to Title 16
\ ice Chair Knoth stated the issue beiore the Commission is Case ;; 2008-01. Public Notice
Amendments to Title 16.
I-Ir. Fish mo~ed:
,, \s, Krieger seconded; THE PUBLIC HE.O.RING Oi\ CASE IIZON~0OS-02 BE OPE:--.ED
AYb
,-..-,.., S:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Brick, Knoth, Roth. King, Krieger, Fish, Calender
1'.one
None
Blei le, Welker
r-lotion carried.
\ts. Tric,a Langon, Senior Planner was S\\Orn in. She s,ated ior ,our consideration is CASE
#1 008-02, Amendmen ts 10 the Unified Developmenl Code oi the Englewood Municipal
Code allowing the publication oi public notices on the City of Englewood website in
addition to publication in the ne"spaper design,11ed as the official newspaper of lhe City.
Already ,ubmitted for the record is proof of publication 1hat 1he notice of the hearing \\a,
published on 1he Englewood Herald on Febru~ry 19, 2008 and also the S1afi Report.
Community Ot>, elopmtnt requests the Conu111ssion re,iew, take public 1es111nony and
fomard 10 City Council a recommendation for appro,al oi the proposed amenchnents to
T11le 16
fne purpose of a Public Notice is to dissem,nate informJtion of public concern 10 the
greatest number of citizens possible. Ciiy Council discussed this issue at a SrJdy Session in
earlv February at the request of the Gtv Clerk. The Giy Clerk asked Council to consider
publocation of legal notices bv either posting on the City's "ebsite or by publicat ion in the
official ne·.1 spap, r. Al th,s time the official ne11 sp,1per of the City as clesigna1ecl by Council
is the Engle,, •. ,d Her.i!rl The re,1;on for the request is that cirize:11 are requesting and
II
r~u.~,.,,,~ 1:11, rm~·on ·r r1 rr~ (it.., thr1 u·/l th--\\or\! \\1de \\~h ~t 1/11, P• 1·H lht'r~ ,r ... l)nh ~lD µ \lfll,lh~ \ ;;,, p.wf "'tlll':'.._nh~ .... r~ :1 ) th.> E·T•:'r:'.\r •1 ,1 ""'~-"J I lr'l l~e Cu, f)f Enfr",\nl)d. • \b LJn~an ;.;hm ·:t'd ,0J'te, oi an e,.,mp!e .1; :o ·.,t-i, 1he Ci1, Cle•~" 1111e·es1t!<l m pla,rr~ l~c Puhii( '-nttcc, on 1~e \ \ eb 111 Jdc:1111 ,n 1, pur>licJII< in :he ne" ,p,1Jlt'' Sht> e1er,mct'cl a cop, o: a recer.1 pi,oltcaaon that \\J> ,~'11 hJ th~ ne•.,;p.!,-1er or record ar.d \\hJt \\J> ,eni ba,J ti) the Comrnunil\ De, elopment D-,pdr:meni ior p1001,ng ) nu '"I' norrce a m,11or error ,n 1he p10<,1 cop, \\h1ch \\0uld h,1•.e caused a monrh's dela, rn 1he Public H.;.mn~ had ,t net l'>c~n correc1ed b, S1a1i. The Recording Secretar\ handed the e\ rbn, 10 the
Comm,ssiont?r. hJr r~"-'"
\ls. Lan gon s1a11?d legJI no11~e; are required ior Jny publiL hearing, berore the C,1, Council
or any City Board or Comm1ss1on. rne request 10 allO\, nottces on the "et aneci, T·tles 1.
-1, 5. 7 , 8. 11 1 ~ a,id 13 as "ell as Title 16: Uni11ed De,elopment Code. The Commission·;
role ,n 1h1s process toni gh t is consideration of amendmen1s to Title 16 ,nlY. In Tit le 16 all
developme 11 1 review procedures requiring a pub lic hearing are lis ted ,n Table 16-2-2.1
Summary oi Deselopment Re, iew Jnd Decision-Making Procedures. She noted a copy ot
Table 16-2-2.1 \\JS included w,th the Srnif Repon in the meeting packet.
According to 16-2,6: Amend ments 10 1he Text oi Title 16 of the Unified De, elopme11 1 Code
any amendment to ntle 1 b must first be co nsidered at a public hearing before the Planni ,1g
and Zoni<1g Comm ission beiore going to City Council. Therefore, when the Ci ty Clerk lakes
amendments 10 th 0 \arious Titles that conta:n informa1ion rela1,ve to public he,1ring1, •
including Titl~ 16. you musl first .:ict or Tille 16 so that the Cir~ Clerk can take those
amendmen ts along \\ith the others.
Tne proposed amendment> are as follows:
16-~-.l; De, elopment ApplicJt,on Procedures
G. 1\oric0 Requiremenb
1. Published :--ouce: otice shall be b} one publication ~
~ fngls;1,ood web<ite or in the oiricial newspaper of the
Cil\. at least ten I I Ol davs before any hearing before the
Council, the Comnm,ion. or the Board. The Caty shall be
re<pon~ible for all required published nottees, and for pro\1ding
e"dence 01 t11;1elv published notice al the 11111e of the hearing
or consideration.
1 o-1 1-1 De11n111011 01 Wordi, Terms. and Phrases
Pub/,c ,\orice: The arlvertiseme,11 of a public hearing in a paper of
gcner ,11 c1rculJ lion in the ar~a. or 1he Cj1y of Egglewood »ebs~lli
the posting of the property. or the mai ling oi written no ti ce, indicati,1g •
the ttm c, pla~e and natu re of a public hear ing .
11
,' •
•
•
\': ~111.!· r't ~,11d ~..,11'!'! t""i> -.\er ·, l'L•"C'!!' l. :o P"'0\h1t:: rmor"'l,.:r.1u r! r:r ;Jc.I , 1met:.:.,1 I ... ,, :,..,. r k"'fl.tl to reJdl iJr r.1nr~ \,:11z.a'1 , ~1:~d 1:,,! Cn, r.h nh/r~ (f)rll f~ I \1•: J'Ll"'l1I\ 1:11 ,, )I '"Qth .. t"). II de •\!'..'o n0, ~ ll'Hll't1t~ ,r~ fl+Jtl\.\.~~ pr.1v .. 'd Ill tn~ pJpe" l'IUI I) in .h.id11rnn to ·ld the .;me•1dm~n11 rn Til.e lb Jr,e ~t,wrJ ted 10 µr m rt!e c 11>1,teric, \\1111 tht' utht>r Till.:, -.1, L.1ngon offered 10 addre,s ,,m Cjlre,t i,)i,, 1i1e Comm rs,ion 1111gh1 hJ1e. \Ir i._,ioth Js ked ii 1he ""rr'ing 1,1'-11 11111 be e ither on the "eb,ile or in the µ,1pt!r. ,\ts. L:111;.,11 ,1,11ec! il 1,ould be ,,, bo :h ,ll 1hr, 111ne> bu t could be ei11,.,r or. fl tht!'t! ,~ an error rn
etthe• locati on the C,11 "'" go \lllh the on!/ 1h,11 is correct
\!,, kreger asked ior claririca1ion regardin~ Table 16-2-2 .1 CIJn1ica11on \\J:, pro,ided b1
,\t;. LJngon and ,\Is. Re,d. ,\\r f..ing asked 11 1he rntention \\J~ 10 place the no11ces in both
media and if there was a di~crepa ncv the C,r, "ould go \\llh the correct one. Ms Langon
stated that \\as correct
,\\r, foh asked ii there are any rule, tor ho" and where the notices "'ill be placed on the
"eb or is that a premature discussion , r\ts, L~ ngon slated 1ha1 is premature at thi; point Al
th,s lime the Or'lly issue before lhe Comm,ss,on is the cha nges for consistency purposes
"i1h i11 Title 16.
r\ Is 1'riPger said she belie, es it II a good ,dea ,ind in the public's best interest 10 see ii on
the" eb. Mr. Fish agreed .
Mr. l\'loth as~ed ii there \\JS an~ pu blic commen: There "as none.
Ms. li.rreger mo,ed:
1\\r, Calonder seconded: THE PUBLIC HE \Rli\G ON CASE #Z0,2008-02 BE GOSED.
AHS.
N/\YS .
ABSTA IN:
Brick. Knoth, Roth, f..,ng, Kriege r, Fish. Calonder
None
None
ABSE\:T: Bleile. Welker
r\ loti on carried.
,, Ir F,,h mo, ed:
,\ Is. K.ie~er seconded: CASE nzo,2ooa-01 PUBLIC l'.OTICE A.\\E:S.DME ,\:T TO
TITLE 16 l,'-.IFIED DEVELOP,\\E ;-.;T CODE BE
RECO .\\,\\E'-DED AS WRITTE'-! FOR APPRO\. .\L TO CITY
cou,oL V111TH ,\ FAVORABLE RECO,\\ME:S.D,\TION FOR
ADOPT1O,.
Ms. Kriege r said she belie,es the amendmen t is in the pub lic\ best intere,t 10 reach as
1dde ,,n audience as poss ible and in any "a1• the City cm. Shi· s,1icl she feel, as e,eryone
gets m,Jre and more digitrzed it's ,er1 1mpm1,1n1 to be ,111 the \\<!band it i~ in the City's
Comprehensi,e Plan as "ell 1ha1 "<' ~~t as 111dt! and as \\ell ecl uL,lt ed ,1 publi c as "e can.
IJ
\' f-::-'.' ~ ... !1d t-t' .l!·~~,.,: ,\11:"I ,,~. "·1~·~!!· l ,t"\1', .,·~,: \\11l:!~ ~·~ccwJ-~-:1 ~l~W ll u~~ ., ~.Ht''. ~r • \ e;iu .. C::.t ',\ ~ h,Jt. , .• 'ILL'!, ~h t!,t? Cl!\ 11~\\ ,!i:!;~r to pd)];:,,h r10{h .. ~~ ~HS :-.-\\-5. -\SST-\I '-: '-one
ASS E, T: Stelle, Weler
t, lotion cJrrred
V. PUBLI C HEAR"G
Case ;; JOO~ -05
Arnendmenrs to Tir:e 16: L'ni1 ed o~,elopment Code •. \\inimum Lor \,\.idrh
Vice Chair Kno rh SIJted the issue berore the Commission is CJse /1 100~ -05. Amendments
to Ti tle 16: Un itied Oe,elopment Code. Minim um Lo t Wi dth.
t-\s. Kri eger moved:
Mr. Calonder seconded: THE PUBLIC HEARl '-G 01' C-\5( #~00~-05 BE OPE'>:ED.
A\E S.
1'.-\YS:
Brick, 1-.not\ Roth, 1-.:rg. Krieger. fo'l. Calonder
fl,one
ASST Al\;: r,..one
AB SE,\ T. Bleile, Welker
M o tion carried
Mr King re.id a disclosure statement.
•1 a-n a homebuilder ,n 1he Ci1y oi E,g!e\,ood. I made some stJtemenu and offered my
opiriion regarding tho? propased UDC change to the front.ige requtremen ts ior mult1-un11
d"e/lir.gs during the P/Jn,mg and l,)mr,g Commission Siudy Ses;ion under the public forum
b~iure becoming a member oi the Pl.inning Jnc/ Zoning Commission. I oli'ered my opinion
/rom a builder', perspect , e \\ 1th 1.1,i intent oi pro,iding insigh t on \VhJt J builder wou ld be
1,,oking for should chis ch,inge in tile ftontJge requirement be passecl and m) opinion on
modiiying the bulk p/Jne mth res;,fct to mulc1-un1t d" e/lirg;. I do nor own any property in
1/ie R-2 zone other th~n my pets<>nJI re;ldence, ha~e no 1mm~i,11e plan; to purchase
propem for mu/ii-unit de,e/opme,r and at t'1,s I/me I am only building single-r';:.mi~
r'!s·c!e.~ces. I be!,e, e I CJn be iully objecu,, ,n any d~cis,ons that I make regJrding this issue.•
t-ls. Krieger mo, ed:
Mr. c a:onde r seco nded: THE PUBLIC HEAR ING 0 .-..: CASE #:!00i-05 BE CO,\JH'-JUED
AT THE APR IL 8, 2008 MEETl,-..:G OF THE PLA:S:N ING ANO
Z0.-..:1,,:; CO .\\\IISSION.
•
•
•
•
•
\. :: Ii..\ .. , l! .... J!'~. . '•1 ..... ;:tL.:l' ll • ·•· J:•,c: 1•1.: : .:·cj .. It') "'"t:'', ,h"''.\ ~; ... \rf' \': FJ .. , .. 11d ·•• '".'-' .,.,, r-ti•'. J• h l t.: c \t:r~d , .. ·11'\ """mp t.'\ a1~d pr.:'"h,1p, nt.:t-<d:-r·ort:! '~\It>'•' \h L,w ndc1 l~,~ -!~:-tad l: Wl~ .. ·1 l~e pL'nlr(' .•.1 I rH: comt!' bJt\ ,l .;.~cond i fl~t. \\t, F1,h ... .;~'..!e .. lt l ;1.1·: pr \.~to:!., ::11:,•1r ;J"t:°'C'1 t .. ::o:1 .. 1·,i.J !"t' pd,i1"" k~itm<Jt,, Jnd t"t!n .:or:In1;~ 1rcr1 1~.11 poo:11 , ·• JI :~<' -\;.inl C r.1~:I·1;. \\r CJionc!~r Jg•<"ed \Ir R<>!h ,J,J r~ bt h~·.ec! :J.,, lom,, 1),1t.r c!u ,• .. rel ··\t·.e ..111 01 t!',c' th:'~ ':.,n ·.,Jntt'C 10 prt>')l''11 tumght. \\, ~:'h:I.!~!" )iJl•'\.-i ,-11e ;;c :,,,)nJl!\ ,\(,L d '"..Jl"t!" '9 "'C(:l..li tr.~ t::!lUre h:iJrinlt C,l'I "'-rnl 8 anc no: pJr: 0 111 t,,nu1H lnd ;::.1:-: s.: 1 11 o 1 ~;,r 8 r r :~r .;.J~t! 01 \.:Jnil"~1:,
.\,ES
'"s .
.\SST-\1,
A6SE, T,
Bm;~. l\nu1t ,, R >Ir 1-.nl!•~-,r
Fosh. C.1londcr I.on~
1'01lt'
Bleile, I I elker
\ lotion carried
\,1. PURLI C FOR UM
i\lr. Knolh Jsked 11 there \\JS ,1m ~11e 11ho wo,hed 10 addr~ss the> Commiss ion,
,\\r Mar~ Wood asked II al the "-Pril s• n·ee1,ng C.\SE =:00"-Oj 11oulc! be 1he i1rs1 is,ue oi
1he noght. The Commission s1J:e,: 11 \1ou ld be .
VIL DIRECTOR'S CHOICE
Director \\'hi1e did nor hJ\ c Jtl\ ·:-on:; 10 bring before 1he Commi»,on.
\Ill. STAFF'S CHO ICE
\'s, Langon read Jn emJ1i rrom \\r. Carl l\dker s:Jling he is ou1 oi 1he hospi1al and hoped
IJ be \,ell enoogb to auend 1he .\pnl 8" mep1ing. She as:.ed the Commissioners 10 pleJse
~ign a s~t 11 •·II card 1or horn.
\\s LJn,:inn s:,1:ed the ne~: m.-e·,ng \1t!I bt! April 8, 1008. \1hich \\ill be the continu,11ion or
ire Pub:,. I learin~ w C.\$E ,.~no-~ll •\or,endmenb 10 Tuie 16: Unllot!d Ot:\clopmcnl
(()dt<. ~\11111num Loi \lttll:l R~4u1r"m"nb 1ur ,\luh,-Lni1 D,,ellins, She ask,;d l ilt!
Co111r11s,11mer, 10 note on 1: .e,r ~alendJr; thJt is the se.:,)nc! Tue,d.11 oi the monlh, nor 1:w
11r;1 Twsdav.
The Aprol 21 ·• n1ee1ong 11 ill he ,1 Stud, Session on the Small AreJ Pl,m
In 1he future l hcrl) 11ill be S1ucl1 s~,sion, 10 di lClll> 01her UOC "nwncln1e11ts
Sh~ 11,11ed ,h~ .1pprc",llt?, JII 1hc lwd >1ork 1he Commi,;ion doe,. She than~ed Vi ce Chair
,:-,01 1, lnr lh,1oring tnn,~ht 's r1~e11111, on shori notice.
15
I'<. ,,, Rt>,d 1h.1n~etl 111,• (0r11111 ,,.)11 Jnd sJ1d ,h, .,.1, t'J,!-. or1pres,~ ,,nh ih, JOh ,~.,., did •l,r,f~~( X. C0"1\IISSIO'-fR'S CHOICE \ Ir foh ,,1,d ie appre~1Jtt.'tl e, er.one a lo" ,ng r,m 10 pur io,:h ;o m.1m ,1me•1dme.irs. He
Jlso lhJnbrl Stan tor all thl' preparauon material 1he, prm ,c!ed Jnd ror help1,ig 1he
Commis,,oo through ire heannn,.
\.I;. Krieger said she appreciated 1, hJI \Ir. F,;h did; all trt' ,s,~es needt'd to be brough1 up
and discu»ed and he did 11 in a 1e r, proress,onal Jnd ,erv 1horoughl) th ought ou1 iush1on.
Mr. 6n ck said he fell most oi the public's concems that \\ere expressed ,11 the I.1st meeting
were d11cussed toni ght and credned Mr. Fish ror doing so .
Mr. Roth referenced an article ,n 1he October ~oo-,ssue of the Col orado Municipalities
magJzine. I I is an anicle about how th e (ii) oi Brush approache d zoning issues an d
suggested the Commissioners rak e a n,on,enl to read it. He also congra tulated I.Ir. Knoth
on a job well don11 1onigh1
Mr. King 1han~ed ,I.Ir. fish for h,, anen11on 10 detai l regarding tonight's heanng.
The meeting adjourn~d at 9:00 p.m.
16
•
•
•
•
•
•
cm OF E:--.GLE \\ 00D PL.\,\a.'m•,,'G .\ ,o ZQ',J\,G COMMISSJ O :-.: I' THE MATTER OF CASE ,;zO,201)8411 Fl',Dl'-GS OF F.\CT, co,CLLSIO',S A ,D RECOM\IE'-D.\TIO ,S TO A \IE'-D THE DE,HR SE ,\\l',.\RY PLA,,ED L '-IT DE VELOP ,\-IE '-T A \IE',DME'-T 2
l~ITIATED B~:
Kent Pl.ice Development Compam I, Inc.
1430 W ynkoop Street, Suite 100
Den, er, Colorado 80202
Fl:\Dl.-:GS OF F.\CT A.',D co:--.cwsIO-:s OF THE Ctn' PL\:-.\IING A ,D ZO:\l'G COM,\IISSIO,,
Commission \\embers Present: Bric~. Calender. l<ing, Knoth, Krieger, Roth , Fi sh
Commission \!ember, Absent: Bleile, \Vel~er
This matter was heJrd beiore the City PIJnning and Zoning Co mnm;ion on 1\l.1rch -l and
March 16, 2008 In the Cm Council ChJmbers oi th e Englewood Ci,ic Center .
Te,umom \\J> rece11ed from StJir, Irom the appl icant and from area residen ts. The
Commission rt!cei,ed notice of Public HeJring. Certification of Posting, S1aii Report and
supplement al informJtion from SIai1. , .. h 1ch "ere incorporated into and made a part of the
record of the Public Hearing
Ait," con>1dering sI.11emen1> of the "unesses, and rede-,ing the pertinent documents, the
memoers of the Cnv Planning and Zoning Commission made rhe follo"ing Findings and
Conclusions
Fl'IDI \IGS OF FACT
I. THAT the request to arnend the Demer Seminar,, Pl.inned Unit De,elopment
Amendment 111Js nled b, 11.ent Place De,elopment Compa:i; I. lnL. on )Jnu.1ry 15.
101)8
2. THAT PubliL l\ot1Ct! 01 l ht! Public H ~a rin'.: \\JS gi\en b\ publication rn the
Engle" 00(,/ H~r,1/d on F1:brtr .1ry 22, 2008.
3. TH.\T the prorerty \,,11 po~t~cl as required, s,1id postin~ senrn~ forth the d.ne, tim e,
and place of th e Public HeJring .
TH.\T ,, 'I r p ,,.,:· L' '.' le-•' 'J , :, c-'e:.;uc-,: • Iv J:11t J 1:· ... D•·'':I••' ,, 1'111',lC\ f''J·•n, ' I Ill (j \ p1'·e·11. \'. l.1~ ~J" 1,,,, :,ccr. to ;•,., .:n:er J lr.e le 1•1 m1,,rr)11 ll1L,; c • .,de:• .d:e re.•i,,1111,: J" J~l,e"Cmc:•:1 .1i;p·1,J:i n. \',. l.m;vn rud1e• ft' ... •i:tt•""' ,~J . t.1;~ rei.:um:;1~nc.!, J;:prO\J c: ~m~nd ... ltt!~t ! \\Uh cc,~,.mors. 5. TH T le-:m1or. 11 .1, ,., "" e:! 1·or: l.e app,1.:j."1!, ""'"' P!J .,.. D, .. , It pri.. .. •1 C rllj.,. "I I I,•~ 6.
P D DI TRJCT Pl.\~
3.
TH T rhe PL D D1,:ric1 Plan is 1n coniorm.ince II ith 1he Dr s:riL t Pl.in
rec;u1rem nls and 1he Comp,ehens11 e Plan.
THAT 11 1s consis len t 1, ith adopted ,ind gene,.111> accepted de, elopment
stJndJrd, in the C1tv of Englt!•,vood.
THAT it is sub,1.1n t1all~ consis 1en 1 wi1 h the goals, objec ti,es, design
guidelines, po licies ,in d am o ther ord inance, la•., or req LJ ireme nt s of 1he Cit \,
8. PUD SITE Pl.\,
I. TH T the PUO Site PIJn i, also in confor:nance 11i1h the Dis rkt r'IJn requirement;,
3
THAT all r quired documents . drJ111ngs, rec o mmendJtions anJ app ·o l'af, hJ, e been recei, ed.
THAT t"ie PUD S11e Plan is consisren1 ,\ith ado p1~ ,ind generJl/y accepted
standJrd, 01 de,elopmenr 01 t!ie Ct oi Engie\\OOd.
TIUT rhe PL'D Sue Pian ,s ubstanua!ly consbie111 \\irh 1he gcab. objecii,es
and po licie aid or anr other ordinance, la1v or requirer1em; of the City .
CO\CL U ro,s
1. TH ,H Int> applicJtron \\JS iii db, l\ent Place De,elop mem Compan~ I Inc . see~111g
appro,al 10 am,•nd the Dem.er Seminan, Planned Unit De\ op ment.
2. TH.\T prci-:1.:r rot111cJtior or lhe da:~. 11me and pla.:e oi 1he Ptrb lrc He,lff n~ 1,,1 s
gr,en b publ1 ,.i11 on m 1~e or11c1,1l C11 y ne•.,spJper and b} pown~ ot th"' prop rrv
for 11,e rec;uired fen~ h 011ime
J . THAT a/I testimonv r,c<!11ed from st.iii members, appl1,.,1n1 reJm member;, and 1h1:
gener.11 public h.1s b ~n m,1de part of tht record of the Public I fearing .
~-PUD DISTRICT PlA,N
/,
THAT r! e PL'D Oislnc t PIJn is in coniorm ,,nce 1,i1!, the Dimic t Pl,111
requir~111:11ts .ind the ComprehensiH; Plan .
•
•
•
•
•
;, TH-\T It ·~ ~ '")!..: ..... , .\t~:., Jd P'~ .?•"(! ..!--''t'r,ti? •. i~~e;J't·tJ .. !..:-.e: I ,_;r·r!•'' ,i~lOL,..lrd~ ,n ,r~ C1:. or e.-.~ .... ,\ Ci_ ,1 THAT I( Ii )1.,:l)~~ .. l,.1ti,11l\ C'Hb,,:i:-•·: ',\Ith .... ~ .!·).1, Qb•d:l',l":0 c:~~-:!'1 gwddire, p,1,I(1;,, ,ind Jn, c1h,r or'iina11c-: IJ'-' or requ,•enMll> 01 :ht.' C 1, PUD SITE Pl.\~ I. THAT the PL D S,t._. Pldn " Ji,O 111 coniormJnce '":h 1h11 Dis1nc1 Pl,1r requirements.
~ THAT JII req1.ired docu111t1nt, dra,"ngs, reccmml••idauon, and uppro,a·,
ha,e been recei,ec.
3 THAT the PUD S11e ~JO I> C0l'>l>h!'.11 \\Uh adopted and gt1nl/rall, accepted
standards oi de,elopme,11 01 the Cm oi bg t!\\ood.
-I THAT the PUD Site PIJn ,, sub,:,,nr.a:I, consis1en1 \\Ith 1he goals. objecme;
and policies and. or am· other ordin.1nce. la" or requiremenr, oi the City.
DECI SIO',
THEREFORE, 11 b rnc-decision o f the Cit~ Pl.in ni ng and Zon ing Commission :hat the
applica tion me-j bv l-.en1 Place Developmen 1 Co mpa ny I, Inc. to amend the Denver
Seminary Planned -~ l Developmen1 be recommend,!d 10 City Counc il for approval wi1h
condltio,1s .
The deci,,on \\JS reached upon a ,01e on a motion made at the meeting 01 1he Cil\
Pl.1rmong and Zoning Comm1ss1on on March 18. ~008, bv Mr Fish. seconded b} ~Is
Krieger. \\hlCh mo1ion states.
CASE l=Z0\.?008-01. DEWER SE,\1/.\A.RY PUD A,\IE\Ot../c:'<T l AS
PROPOSED. BE RECO\IMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL
WITH 4, FAVORABLE RECOl>of\lE,\DATION FOR ADOPTION. SUBJECT
TO THE FOLL0\1/ING CONDITIONS:
1. All appro,ed condi 1i ons and requirements es1ablishecl
under the Den,er Seminal) PUD and Denver Seminary PUD ·
'-mendment I shall applv unless amended !:,y Amendment 2.
' Amendrr.tml ~ ac~no" 'edges the need for flexible
de,e:opment op11ons by establi,hing 1hree /)) de,e!opment
envelop,>,. Technical site plan re, ie\\ of dt'wlopment \\llhin
rnd emelopes shall he bv the De,dop111en1 R.-,ie•., Team
r~\le\, tor compliance \\Ith PUD and C11y de,elopmen:
standard,.
3. Envelope 2 shall be li mited 10 uses permi 1ted i n 1he
"househo ld li"ng" ca tegory of 1he PUD's Table ;i Allowed
Uses.
AYES:
N1WS:
ABSTAI'-:
ABSE'lT
a H •. u,e ;hall h<' lt,c.ltl'd ,, 11h11 Em ti,,pe I or, 1,. H, ·el u,e ,r,1,I not !le J ,epJrJtc ,:Jnd-J'.one U)~. c. The m,1,imum ntJmoer oi hot<!! room, ,h,111 he lSJ
d. II hotel use is apprO\ ed, the 10ll0" 1~ , gue,t
accommodation allo"ance appro, ed in the
onginal PUD ;hall be amended to :
• 3. The number oi residential units does
not include proposed guest
accommodation ior guesls of residents of
the project. Such spaces shall not exceed
900 S.F. and no more than two such
spttce, per resideQl idl r,qodomi nium
im e~ild iAg ( 12 te1al) shall be
provided •
King. Knoth, Krieger, Calonder Roth
Fis h, Brick
None
Bleile, \Vel~er
The mouon carried.
These Findings and Conclusions are efiec11,e as of the meeting on "larch 18, 2(, ;,
•
•
• Apri l 9. 1008 Tricia Langon. Senior Pl anner Communi1y Oevelopmenl C11y of Englewood
I 000 Englewood Par!(way
Englewood, CO 80110-2373
l\ENT .P L ACE
Rt: · Ktnl Place Dn·tlopme111-PC:D (Amtndment I to Amendmmt 2) Summary
Dear Tricia:
Based on conditions made by the Planning and Zoning Commission and comments made at Lhe
hming, we made 1he following modifications to the PUD:
I . Sheet PUD-1 : Development Standards no1c D.3-Mod ified the hotel use room to
residential unit ratio from "I room= .5 units" to ·•1 room= I unit",
2. Sheet PUD-4: Revised Bulk Plane Section #1 per agreement with Kent Village
• Association regarding dormer configura1ion and restrictions .
•
Also. Lhc following r ummary pomb arc offered a, clarification to issues dhcussed during Lhe
hearing:
• Original zoning permitted 6 towers plus 45 townhomcs :md 65.000 sq. ft. of retail m d
office space. The zoning clso established towe r heights :md setbacks from adjacent
residcn1ial areas. The zoning included very specifi c foo1prints for each building on the
site,
• The modifications made have generall y reduced the overa ll hcigh1 and dcnsi1y of 1he
dcvelopmen1. The fim modifica1ion to the PUD reduced Lhe number of towers to 4 and
reduced Lhe commercial uses to 51.500 ~f. It also created a single envelope for the towers
on the northern ponion of the site.
• This second rezoning has been necerntated by changes in Lhe market and the need for
ne.tibility 10 respond to Lhc m11tket (more nexibility in unil design. building program
des ign md phasing). We have al~o add~d a small hotel as an additional land u~c opuon.
It is not highly likely we \\Ould substitute a hotel for a ponion of Lhc housing otherwise
appro,·cd, but it is helpful 10 be able 10 explore 1he option if it should tum out to make
sense.
• w~ have tried to work wi1hin lhe highly specific building foo 1prints called out in Lhe
original zon ing. but they ore proving to be nn obstacle to advancing Lhe project. If even a
1,.i1\!U9 DOC' !t
minor d1ange i, rcql11rcd. 1hc PUD 111o<lifi~a1ion pro~c" 1:1kc, 5-6 mo111h,. Enve lope, thm rcncct the ,amc hc1gh1 lunii-Jlld ,amc ,cthJck requ1rcmen1< make more ,cn,e and 11 tll allo" 1hc Devdopmem Rc,1e11 Team 10 make ,urc the building< bmugl11 fon,ard arc complianl II i1h all restric1ion~ :rnd 1hc goals of the ongmal zoning. • Projcc1 S1atus -We have 1cn, of million, of dolla rs alrc:idy in\'cs1cd in acquiring 1hc ,i1c. demoli1ion. dc,ign of building, and si 1e impro\'emen1s and the sales ccmcr and sales progr:im. We know we c:m ad, once the re1a1l and office componcnl< of the project. Those are de,igncd. appro, ed and largely ready 10 go. bu1 we need a d1ffcre111 approach
10 phasing the housing components and 1he abili1y 10 modify some of 1he options we are
providing (auachcd 1ownhomcs vs. villas or duplexes for in,1nnce). We have buyers and
in1erc;t. but we simp ly can't ,,an with the original I I I fir..t-phase h· 1g units in the
currem market cond11ions
• II is imponam 10 undcrs1ond all of the reql1ircmcn1s tha1 ore no1 char11mg -height limits.
se1b,cks. roadway i111pro"cme111s. traffic signal. pe ri meter walls on our si1e and across
Uni"ersuy. and lhc qualuy of project. We nre building es1cn1ially the 1ame scale of
commercial uses originally approved for the site. and lc.s 1otal housing :ind fewer 1owcrs
than original! y approved and respecting nil of the original commitmen1s made to the
community abcul heights, se1bncks. etc.
• lf we can complete the PUD process. we will be ready to 1tan this yenr. If people want 10
be sure about the quality of whal we will build, they can Slill c'Ome see the building
elcva1ions and model in our sales center. The main retail bu;lding is a good example. II
is designed and ready to go and it is not going la chang~. The other buildings on site will
be of a comparable very high quali1y.
Please !el me know if you need nny addi1ional informa1ian.
Very truly yours. 2_""'. f~"' Campany I. Inc.
Kevin Foht
Dc\'elopmcn1 Director
Enclosure,
•
•
•
•
•
•
IJY AL"lllORm· ORDINANCE l'-0. SERIES OF 1008 COUNCIL BILL NO. 23 INTROOUCFI) 13\' t'OLTNt'II. MEMBER ____ _ A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE DENVER SEMINARY PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT NO, 1.
WHEREAS. lhc EnglC"o"ood C11y Coonc,I appro,ed 1hr Denver Scnunary Planned Uno1
Dcvclopmcnl with the passage of0rd1nancc No. 51. Series of 2004: and
WHEREAS. Continuum Chcny Hills Land Company. LLC filed an apphcauon for nn
amendment lo lhc 1004 PlaMed Un11 Oc\'Clopmcnt; and
WHEREAS. 1he Englewood C11y Council approved Amendmenl No. I. which proposed no
changes 10 the general ehnmctcr of 1he dcvclopmcn1 of for-sale residential and limi1ed rein ii uses
wi1h 1hc passage of Ordina nce No. 5. Series 0(2007: and
WHEREAS. lhis Amcndmerll No. 2. proposes si1e plan adjuS1men1s lo address dcvclopmcnl
based on changing markel condil ions by cs 1nblishing '"envelopes'": and
WHEREAS. 1he •·cn,clopc'" conc,,pl pro,ides 1he Oexibility to make chang,-s to building
locnuon and oric111a1io1110 meet consumer and market demands wi1hou1 lhc need to amend the
PUD sue plan each mnc an adJus1me111 1s COn!odered: and
\\'IIEREAS. the changes of Amcndmcm No.2101he PUD arc:
• Three c,wclopcs on which an allowed use or activity may occur provided all PUD
height. setback. bulk plane. nnd Ooor area requiremcn1s arc met . Es1nblisluncn1 of
the envelope does nol mean 1l1c envelope will be complelcl)• filled: only 1ha1
development may occur wi1hin 1hc envelope area.
• Audi1ron uf si ngle nnd 1wo-unit residentinl use:
• Addi tion of ho1cl use:
• lncrcnsc in rc1oiVco111mcrcial space 10 75,000 square feel:
• Decrease 1hc number of residential unlls from 350 IO 300:
• Limil donncrs on struc1urcs along west boundary (Nei,'Olm!L-d wilh Kc111 Village):
• Coord1na1c hull. plane nnd height lo each envelope:: and
WHEREAS. pursuanl 10 E.M · 164-1~(7)(2). major mod11icn1ions 10 o P U.D. D1s1nct Plan
must be approved pursu:111110 the same hn111a11011• anJ n:quorcmcnts by which •uch Pinn \\a:,
ong1nally nppro, ed: and
WHEREAS. the Englewood l'lannmg and 2.omng Commission held Public l lcann1:s on March
4. and March l 8. 2008. rc,·iewed lhe Amendmcnl of the Planned Uni I Oev;il•rmcnl and
recommended approvnl of this Denver Seminary Planned Unil Oe\'elopmenl Au.~ndmcnt No. 2
wi1h 1he followi ng condilions:
I. All ap1iro,·cd cond111ons ;ind requirement, c,tahh,hcd under the Dc111cr Scntlllnl) l'L'I) and Den, er Scmmnl) l'L:D-AnwrKhncnt I. ,hnll appl) unlc" mncndcd h) Amendment 1 ~-Amendment ~ ocknowlcdg,•s the need ft,r llcxihlc de, clopmcm opri,>ns h)' esinbhshing three (3) de, ch,pmcnt cn\'elopcs. Tcch111cal sue plnn re\'icw of de, elopmenl \\llhm said en, dopes shall be by the Oe,elopnwm Rc,ic" r cam for complianc. \I 11h PUD und Cui de, clopment stntKlarJs. 3. bwclope 2 shall be limited 10 uses pcnnincd in 1hc "household living" category of
the PUD's Table of Allowed Uses.
4. Hotel Use shnll he limited ns follows:
a. Hotel use shall be localed within En\'clopc I only.
b. Hotel use shall not be a separate, s1and-.'llone use.
c. The maxnnum number of hold rooms shall be 150.
d. If hotel use is appro\'ed. the following guest accommodation allowance
appro,·ed in the ori~inal PUD shall be nmendcd 10:
··3. The number of rcsidenunl units does nol mclude proposed guest
accommodmion for guests for residents of the project. Such spaces shall nol
exceed 900 S.F. and no more than two such spaces o,er,n;sideQlipl
condpQ)ipjum tgwg hYildiRf! (IJ 101al) shall be provided,"
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY TIIE CITY COUNCIL 0~ THE Cl rv OF
L:NOLEWOOD. COLORADO. AS FOLLOWS:
Section I. The En[!lewnod Coty Council has re, rewed 1hc Amendment No. 2 lo the Denver
S<minary Planned Un11 De,elopmem and pursuant 10 16-1-15(1)(2) E.M .C. and finds 11tn11hc
P.U.O. amendment is in confom1ancc with the approved rlanned Unit Devclopmcol requirements.
Section :?. The Engle" ood City Council finds that all required docwnen1s , rlrawings. rcfm-als.
recommendations and approvals have been received .
Section'· The Englewood City Council finds 1hn1 1hc amended P.U.D. sue plan is consis1en1
"1th adopted and gener:illy 3<:Cq)led .aandards of dC\'clopmcn1 Within lhc Ci1y.
~-The Eng lcw~o<l l'i1y Council linds 1h11t 1hc nmc11dcu P.U.D. site pion is subs111111ially
ronsistt'OI with 1hc ~'<'-1~. ohJecti\'cs and policies and'or any oihcr ordinance. law or requirement of
theCuy.
~-The Ci1y Council of tltc C11y of F.nglewood. Colorado hereby approves Amcndmcm
Nn. 2 10 1he Plan11<-d Unit Development for lhe Denver Seminary. anachcd hereto as Exh1bi1 A,
~. l'u~uam 10 1\n1clc V. St-ca ion 40. of1hc EnglC\\tlOd Hom<: Ruic Chaner, the Coty
Council has dclcnnincd 1h01 Exhibit A. 1111ached m this Ordinnncc ;hall not he published because
of ils ,11c. A copy of Exhibit A. is available in theOOicc of lhc Englewood Cily Clerk.
lr111oduccd. read in full. and passed on first reading on the 21" day of April. 2008,
•
•
•
.. •
•
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on 1hc ~" day of April. 2008. Jamcs K. Woodward. Mo)-or ATTEST:
Lou<:rish,a A. Ellis. Ci1y Clerk
I. Loucrish,a A. Ellis. Cny Clerk of 1hc City of Englcwc,od. Colorado. hereby ccmfy 1hl11 the
above and foregoing is o INC copy of a Bill for an Ordinance. imroduccd. read in full. ond passed on
lim rcading on the 21 • doy of April, 200S.
Loucrishia A. Ellis
DENVER SEMINARY PLA NN ED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (DISTRICT PLAN)
AM ENDMENT 2
fXH IOIT i\
.1a N1 TY MAP .,, ,....., ENGLEWOOD, COLO RAD O
'. ··{] ..
BACKGROUND
pup PEYEI oPM ENJ SUMMARY
111,t ........ •~I N",.f • ~,<~,,,., ,-t: Ill .,illt'& ...,. •"'° f' I '•,QDD
.!i'). alt: ff(1 (ii llfU·1./~HC( SI>&~{ 11'( •I '""-fOII C( (Oo,(f,' ~l 1\ H ....,.-..,(c, 1-, f"'l.
'.OL"oll.•~1 Ctw-.f• :1f h,f ~l1T1 01, ICi'"' SC4't; .,11 T"{ ',111111 • "'"' •1.1 ft411> t,;11 LOC &'1t1
f ""'f•.-. & I f.Q".; ... , ...... (.,1,,1•~ • 81.tK•'I ~ ..... , , 6'IJl,llil
"'ll:•:.• .. 111.•• 1 ,.,.._.., • I• f'C 'f:l..,,r,_,n • Ofi,'!'\IP WIii "" l"'( .... •l ... .,. .....
MEJROPOUTAN PfSfflfCT SUMMARY
,l,t ..,.r.,1ht(I) n,,ot(ll'lr ~ loll,!111. rt,I •: """~lu·~~~"••· a ... , .. :,
10'! 1rt,•o~u, ,I '''"",'""IC, ,,~.u, ..,., ,,.~ ,,v.~l'llli.c11rw,, (If M II\JII,~ """"°"''if,.t~ .)',
">,(M,,..•1o •-~ ~•11·n ~Qll~.,./at>. 'MI O:U•.•,...f,d.4-.Wll(*t,,,r>,,,~.._l
r;:"i!'fllf-A••~....,_.,,..._,. .. .....,c, illr,,••t~1t-..;:...«~-.st"41 l ""'ll'
..... " ~C-~llllt•'S , .... •-'IC .. ~ .... ,'f' ... ~ ... ~19(1 ljllQ •:>• ,. .. ,i,Mltl\• N.,t. ·"
~:.\"'.~ :.~~~--~ i''t ,;'1:-..~"~.t•.J ~/~\"i',)"':'~;-~,:.~"'.~ .. ,:,(
•1 1',i,, • ...:; k(;i,Jllt'• ·· f'l()M •-.t••A,( toe :.& { "'lllrlJ( ,._ .rt,(.-.T•• , _,. •
'(I 11\11 s~&',(1&11':IS 0,1 .... ~• 1 '41 lo(t • ..,. IA""'( •t ..._. f •I • •~l~•-.'I U•
... cu,1°"" """' •r1Hti k-... ~Mit ~ .... .,., ,.r,,•N\ .,,,,~ :,,t. •f• .. .:, 11, ••4"1-·, -. ·-•"'-I«"'._ >j ""' •r-.a.11, ..... t, II<( l 1h '.,,It, •u 't'llff'IJ(lt '0 11.fO,,flll f.,.i l,
'' llCf•l.v! Ill.---~ ,,,,Oil ..,i••,. ._ •V .,,.,-.'l•••••·c T .,._ ••, "" ... t ........ ,. ...... -... ._, ...... ~ .. "(, .... .... ..:.'II• ..... ••-"'t..--.•111,1t1--.•••-0--·,....C.w•-.-,,..,.. &·~••II'""-.-.
PUQ DISTRICT PI.AN -PEYELOPMENJ STANDARDS
f t.l'Jwt••1 .,-, &JICII\,. I ... {. ot•-J ".cK. '•• '< ... , ... "t -'', ....,...,¥.,
•NIii ti\ !lot 1 •• 1'\ICfiJ \i.OIL,&it! •t~ .-' ·... lit Ill' • 'I(• ialll ,,,.• '• O•,
tl't\lA'•Jo I • I-< 111-00,,,,C-.I 'OI ,,-.::_ ._, ..... ,._II I /r-_l 0~?11.1 \1-IIU t Ill/{ I fj,'M
.... "'t ~ .. 'l t, ""1. ~-•• 1W ' -, (I •◄ -,. ~ t.1oc .. 1-."' .......... zo.. .... -"'--.,~~l,--......... &t ~ '""" .............. ,o,, j t .... 1-( ~
I l'f•Ol!'ltf~•lo(>IJ41-1N'> IHl IIIMI.I' '"'•'-'•~"'-1 ~i. atf"V,t\ .,.._,, ._. .,. , .. , t•,•·-' • .,.. ,._ ,,_, u111u ,,.,,.., .,., "1..-r ...,_ '"" ,..,, r-c. .l'\t '"" '"1-t111,,_,.,..,.w.,.,4•v ...... ,.,,,.. /4"1 ~,-• .,.,,.. r,,•.i~•tl , ....
"<lt'tC-•oflt ...._>41U""M'"'--
-.r" i.,.lt"'.l~tflof:IQU--'111 &'fC,,•oillt I .... U .. -'-t M\.• ... .. r,, .. ,.:,,-, •"' , .... t "r~• ""'° , 11111n ,i, l"'f' · """'" ,..WI ~ ..,.11""'" .., 111., ,,. , ,...
''"'~(,t)o0w11o.··•-. "'-"-1\11,1 111• u''""l<l 'Wll(C' 1c.,-.on..-• ~ir•&.i ........... -'I'..(.. .., ....... c,. ... ,'
K N'& xee,n M INIJ,I 11 WJZl!'[P uv:s
vtrc,._.-... .._ ....... .... ,.,.,..,,
..,,.. ...
~~""'l"'~l~A: 'l1(j
...... ,<,,,oj• ...
.. !l ·-~ ... ... ".' /; .....
o.w,c~ .. , •. ~' ... ••,Ill ,..., ")_Ra1
""'"' • 1 ,. '
lV\•1n."' ~ , .. ,, .. 11~·· ....,, .• _. .. , ,,a.
:_:~ '~ '
~· ···~t~·· .... :J.
f ••• _ .. , ..,. ,·t .... •'-t'."'\• .. ·-lk'l\\•, .. <.• ,"4.f '"'l~"•"-•' ":, I•.,_ l. •'" ,,..,, • .,, .,.~-.. r .,, .. ,,._..,.,
""' ,-.·1• . , .
• ·•◄• ••.• ''"-=. ...
.... ,,..,..,_, !ii'" ..,,.. .. , ...... ~ ,~ "' ... • , .. :,. ... .., .. '
...... , '\,,<(;.t{IO
·-.•· •-C -~:J\"'!.,.( ~,~.._ .. ~:-'".~r.
1 '.flll~ f ..... , t• .. JO.ft• •\j_ w• ... 11, ~ ('9
1,,;..A. t •,S...,\
.......... , ... ~ .. :•·.. .... ti
~l'i.';•~~r, 1~~!:,~.,i·°' , .. .,.. J• 8,,. ,,,. ~._, '"'"'-i
_ .... ,. ~. ,.,,.1 .,~,-._;y..
l'U'\.".~•..-•-.;t..,'.Jrltt•· ol,t ...:_•,,._ lJ.t 1,•
U~(lf"-Wlt '1"'11(,"f•·,o,rr.
•I I•-.;(
::-.... '-!:~ .. ::.~·
l'.\•"':·<•·~•1
\1,:1 , I ••llfl•OII o\"'UI l.,.t-..r .. W•tt.,o,
... ..,, .. ,. ...... \'/)II...,
.. • .. .... ... ·' ~ .. ;r ·-....... .-~·••:;. ~::~~;,~-~1~•~;•~,., .. ,.., II.Cl • .,,...., I\'\ •-o ..
.., , .... ~ot•"-.f't ...... ~~ .. ~fitlur t\11 • .... ~""1:.?&1::..~",41. _.,.,
..... "'I:• f·l,,.11,
,;.!: ~~-n~w-.:_~o
..... if" .. -••::t .....
••~'t ,._,,.'.It• IU•()ol \" ~.&.Ill ,.J ,.,zo•ilw'J uSII >
I(\~•·""'""'' ... , ... t. (lo\.~ t ll4t ,,.;. ~,~r ~xr': ... 4....i . .. , .. .. ..
' ..
~· . ....... t ~-,
♦ ..... .. , .. , .... ,\, ~.•~· i,r-:.. ..... .. ..... .. ~,, .,. ... ,.
''"' •t 9""1'{.
~ ... _ .. ... , , ; .... .__. . ,.,
'"'"·.(01 \ ...
...... ff
-◄ ,, .. ....,_ . ..
•':loo.•'t .... • .. 11,, .,.,.\
$ ""' ... " I •·•i:tf to ti,(...,, tl'ftl(" ..... Wu.--. w ~II' al\u,, UH ill W•(.I I -.._. ..... r.• .... ..-.u. .. ,n:.f1~·cn .. ..-:,11t•.,,..~ .• .,,-:r•""i....i .. r_..,..,...._.,_,..,:,.,,."St•-""1-a'..,.,......,~ i:,,x ... ·•'1-•• •~J •
-""''•ti) J •,. l'j
..,._ _, .. ,;,,,~ •'~ I ~ " .U, I◄ '1 .,_. ~ •-• t(·,(1 •"("1 .1.,...,,
.... ,.. ,.._.,,_*.'I:•""'·• A"'' I\~ 1"9(.,.;""' ··-'1 ~'-"' ...-'-. • Qh••IOII
~•• "(tf ,.. •• -.. i. ·"' a 'ft,.,t..._ • ,~.•,u•-... ""'' •••·;or.· "'-'i «•••I -.~ tr-•.l -.01 t( ,t.e.,11,a:0 r AO!• Of" ti,( f<\.l,C-WJlo,.;, ~ ~,~ r II{,.-,
'} • ~-•11,1,( .._ hol, ~'"•••ti(• IJ' rlo( Cl['Wf.1~1tl 1)11
:• t ~ .. ....a: OI K ll'C._ '1lf ;~« ~\. ·"Vt
'· .. '•"'""" .. ...,_ loPt•a. ,~ ,~..,. :, """ _,V\, "'
•l ""' .. ~Ul ,. "'1l Wh\l .... to( ;.,ol ex ......... °"" .. <,r ",., -r,, -<Jr, .. ! ....
t•·to-n-1f I~ t il"wS """(U (lt '"'-"1 ll"IO 1(11 I~..,_ /,t-,1 SIJP, 11,·•t:•<,t ;,,.1
.. • l•.U . .,_ ~1.,.,.1, ,, "
............ , "'"'4"'-i,000(.• #, .. '\, -..U'!•~-♦·tO(I"""-:,,~•c. ..
••It '.._ "l'f ',i.f .•-. •-•• -'"'-l"" .. l1'1,,..""'"1fa. • -.;1,1» .i••• ,.,.,., ;.,,! 1Ul1l1,1,-III ,11-..1 "I,( f l \1#1 lt o'j 1 .. · 1111\Zli,,I ,'I \,It
t • .i ~• .._ ...-fl♦£ ""' • ••~ ~ttl•I• '-""'--',. (lit
T ..._. .... ~•-a"•• ..,,... , .. ,._ •• ....-.-l'-' .ti, "-A .).-.,: -'"'ii ■•\,. " '9 """';l .... ,w; -•
81 A •ltl.(ll-... ll• Ii! lit ''"'" 1-0 Otlt.£.-.1 11'1 " '"f ,,._ •~1 • !11.., ... ,10 IC,. .... 1,C.111' .. ,. O"
.t ••"'-::ntlll' ... ~Ht,C)I cfl \ ... 11....,_,..,a"'t t 6{"" !ii'• .,; • "'
..., .. c;t •-'tit•,-,~,..,,..,."~"'--.>
I • ,.,._.'",,( .... , •i., ~ •~(j N-·11 "-"'-' •~"'~• .,-• •• ►• \
I0.11(,1'~ ,.,.,, Clllllt tH ~( /1,.l,O,,.'t ¥4• ~ ... , •""tl\f ,;tf(' &.,p I ,lllll t,,,.II 111 '" ~·,r1t\.•""
t P -"•.~<,J;...-• •,1 · .,: • .,., '"""".t ••• flt
.,.._...._ ~ • .... I U/lt ••...;: .~r ,.,. ;.,tit '' &'4
U-. 4,.\0l'•~I ... ,. ......... /1(11111 Al't<#',\tl
GENERAL NOTES
•I(...,""'"" •1. ''"°"' h• 'oh,.11,,,1 ('<f.-,;o, .... l~ V '"I\ .,.. .. ,.. ,l( ,,. •[lllf\•·f .. ,f!M•,
• --C.-,o.t•1Y "'(Ct ._,._ .. , 0◄ .,.,_._ .._ U•f• ~-, Ol'fl. .. ,! , .. , ~A I C(,fl.<..,•
1 111\~,.,,.,..,u ...... ,., .., '·•"'·""·•'''•f•._..,,.,. ,,__ ... -i: -. lll(w•,~•
.. Olifl ... 0-r"l(•·•"'l.11'• r1 tt,,....,fdl,Lt <,I k"t l'\.U.t..tl .. ltt;f 1¥1''
f 'llf.<il(1o;'Vl.'11 I •◄ I• _,.._,t .4_,., •l ,i,,f ..,. ,_.,I ,_., •'t• 1)1'\,1o,1 ~IM •• , •• -,.,.. ..... ,-..:••·· ""'>·"'
.. .l"'I: ....... ~ ...... .l;.("'l•..a·••l.-•'91 ....... 1!1.---.... "-1,
• 1\-,:!, f'l.l'(.r, DI.to,,,~·,(.,~,..• tflO ff•lf ,1,,."'00 r .• ,
• <J!:• I t>r• ,.,a.,,i ",it,._~ -/1., "Ii 1• I tm..l'lf ,t ._ l,t Ir· ,+& ■ ~ • '°''' , .. ,, ......
~ , ,.,_ ., ' --=-· ...... ,. ........ .c 1 1,H' 1 ........... eoi I\ ""' _,,,., .....
~"-S'"II •• ~11,,.;41,_ 11-., (Olll,.~lt( ':,,1111(14&" :, ,..,,_,.,.. >, ,..,
t .. ,,. olif •ll:•0.,.1• ,,.._., fol I (U• ,:, l .. ,.,..,
.... _ ···--• ti>.., •tt .._. ... ll:!l,'11 -.1 ...... . ...... ,., .. u ... _,, {\........ .... • ....... .
lb&'f ohlftlOll.'-t, ....... , .. ~••" .. ·""'-1 :I ._,. • ,._ I
i..·r .~, • .,.,~. ~•· '"" .,. ---'' ,.
~ ... ~'( """-'l"'•• •••••·•• ! ~ l>t
.ic, , .. _._... "''""' • to .... "" • ·~ ' --'61• ,,-..,.:v.t • 11t0•jjlll" H-t .,,. ..,,.,_,., ..,.-..., ,._.ur.,.
·~ ..,.I
~ <Noj't ~-•.1 ....... '1 ._.,;
' .. f~:';,'" .... --. ...... 1-14"'---"'·~·-......... -·
• ~1 ·'" 1 ..,,.a Ill ( 1o 1.-~,,u,., • ., 11,f ....,,"~ ,,.,hlJ01~ au
-· .. o,i 11 M· .,., ti)• • r-t.'flt"rr~lt 1,,,.
•,£ ' .... c.: ,., U,,.)-., il'"-t• ..... l"f •• -.c ..... ~ ~tt,11, • ........ ..
••'"'l,<l •h"1'." --..~.-''""'"""'"'" •t , •· ti.It, M(:,,u .. ,., '#-' ~~ •· ,,,r. ... :. • • """ ••••••Y,J""",_"JIC.',.p,,,. . .;◄I . • l'w ,.
II .. &• '.9 4'-• 't,f,'>:O. ..... .If ~ I
""· ~ -( .~ -~ ~ ...... ~· ....... '-.i ...r, itt-.r ,, 1,·r.:11 • r-.c•c-.-:,1, rov •,t 1• , ... ,.," .--,·
•'li"{v, • ·•••.,,fl!••·•• il•Ui. l
• ~ ' .. ,... .. • ....... t . ,..., .-M If ,...-,..,,_,. ,,
:1 "' .......... .
' I • 1•1 ';tt I◄ •1•1 l'I •1• ...-,. I ,,._...._ l """ ,,.,or,,-,.,
1 'II 1ot ,11o,t • A
l IO(,S,ci,,,\
• I .,._ • "-• Ill I
AGENCY CONTACT usr
"'• I
~ .. ....,.,.
Sl!E.JWA
. ,.
•fi '0"DIIV•t
:,(r II l ,,,._., ,1,,
SURYEXED LEGAL DESCRIPTION
.. , ' • ,j
., ... ,., .. "t" --r-,• ..
.... ' ~ap ...
'•'(Ct o<t• .
SHEET INDEX
'" I lit.I Pi"-'
,. I 111'\,,C(• !j,, I. •,e• . --:J. ,..~ ... .. ·"-"""' ,._
SIGNATURES
...
. ,•,
~o rOR CO,,. flNUUt,t OtCMY HU.S U"'°O C()WPM T. UC.
AHO t<(N t Pl.AC( IN\1:SlORS, LLC
..... ,,ti:
I fJ ''t
.... &o,)IILtO,..t fL1 .. 1 "'-t..: , .
... , ..... __
.... ,.
ATTtSTtO
Q.(IN AND RECOROUt'S CWTICt
lt,i!~l'LAJ,;<fi , ... 1 t,f,1 1'>\<1,.,-• ,r•t • ~ -~ •• ••~ llt IV ,., ,r-. ".., ~< • • • .,...~
/h!'i' __ ,,
Wt~.,,.~"""• _t('Qo-t.Wlo l'-l:.f•1¥ti61
DISTRI CT PLAN
OOf\Ot SO,aWl:'t ,uo-,-a:t""'.:Al 2
•lt,lt • I• I • ,,_ t PUD -1
J ..,
..)
z
1-z
••• _... '-..1,. .......
~ ..... .,,... ..... POI.ht •<;I
I~ •111,(',i .... • ■M~f•
-~ "-<-.-"'i'. !'JAY. .. ~11 • A&,':C, "II~.-;;( 1 -.o;:,o-. .. "' ~• • •uu •a-,. ..... •':it 'lt •'N
._ • t\lll.._. •"fU • ■ ... ~ .. 'I '\ ""'I l,:,r. [ ¥V" '"' ~ A -" •"""' .....
..., "' ~ .... , .,;• • P-,( •v:,i,.14..,,-as .. ,. •• -.-.; . .,.""' • ..,:M • .,.~ _,..._ """
".,..,._.,.,, "I • •"L , 4t\•• t '-1 ,l "'I,~ .. ,..,.., .,. • 1111..c. •w"''\ U •• •
'Ir• ... " .,1,1 ••• .,. .. ,, .... :.
~-••\;
,.,.. .. •~~,.., •• ,11..-,:::.ct,"1 .. ..,,.,1 ..,, ••••••~•~tt-,•'\•.o~ to t •~• .,, ,i.,~, .. ,..., .._c.., ""'....-,, ,--.. ... 11 u,·n "-,.ll ., '·"'"-
••~~ , •. o.;u ~ ... M ..... \.l"'U.' 1.,, ..., ....... • • °'"'" ,.,. , II'., a-c:, t• ~ •• ,oc,· ~ • ""-~
ti.c: 0(1(~0'(• "V"9 10 fAO M ~t1 "' .. .,.,,~, .-...~ •I " lfilllC"'•U "''' .. °"
f$1 .... •5(ff --V.t1tN tll("h /Q"t,((fV\b,.~1 o,(l'tllf'i .. ,0,.•1~~6..,~.A!A.--C:
ftl,~O 1),'"4,. W ,o,r,~•-.. 110 I \ ltlOJIIIIU J1) l,(9-tf ""1 9'( •I O{t("i.Olftl 1U .,.,'" ,l'llfl .._,._...,_ a OOl'tO
f't4t N)A:tt ,..lroa. .C...c( A <i(• ii0Jro6Ul0£1'"'1~ I t IA,~ ..... .cu,, t::h.,,.[U ,al) .....
(•ll«G\1"'1 Vi'II "-""' o l lQI,,"" IQltooO _.._., ... ,T JCt,t,,t ~ olMl,lll(I(., .-,c._ ._~ I fl(•-~ l...C. ~ "'C "°"'"' ~'10 I,~ 0,. Pl( ~l SU: 0, u,,c ,,{"51'1't -=-,..r,&111)
tO f.c !JW,{UIT OI .. " IOI.I'-'O ti~ iw, r•lll(t ,0 JII(' <• •lilitlll'CII" ('tiM'I •J
C .a, .. , Ml ,t.(U,.[f16'0; U,C 0,,. .. C II IOL.-o~lt l 'ft""" ..... t "?"Of 01' s,fa.:£
Jl'l(II "'Q"Uf,lf ,0 k l ot ,.... ~ &JG lfttl'Mlt ~ fQ I-( ~ll'I Mlt-.Z
""""KCo-\lO trt .. Alll
.... ..,VIC(. r, "-OLCf #.,L.. COrill\l'I~ -OJr,( oa w:,11( ... ,:su .. r~ C•1(
t' .. Q.iC,, .... ,t,n ..... Mu.el I'll( COl#IJ.ac,,.;:, 111t• • ..., ..... "'''-•""f.S .. , 6111[
'l;fc:(fl..wl• 'O\l.•.C: tMf. MCWwl COlll'\l'ltli"' """ ..... 1(.. •.s. ~ 0$ tlC. t:CW\1 .. {:\11, 17
"C f(.-c:111.,1 ~-~ ..... .CC \""(t ,,ilfl ..ru\t.ah ,0 VII( 1IIOt ""'°""'
"" 9\~ """'~ a.)A/1~"" '""'. "'-"' ., "''"""" AGII.L'"11:"' .hl(l_ .. :!o,( Cl(,LOI(• .,,_ "4. ,, •......c-LI fll 0C.ll0,(I
~t ... c,,(9 ......._ \.IIGlo,.)[ 84 1il,<i,-... .t.l ~ ......._.,,..,,.,_If),,, ..,,~c101t 10
-..(;CIM,.)(l•lf • -...c.., ~lfl ll,._ l 6'11f fOII 101.,""ICt,l,O •.N.t.•1'-'-"'C _,~ !'(II'
....... .;,,,c. I"( '9.C•< ~ CMH)t .... ,.,.0 t,111~ )O! """"' ._,ci .....-o ..... it ~•-..u,
'I,,( t,t, .-.., o,f.,l ~tt-, ~--~-0 ..._.\III o.1411'(1 4u !Sl't t\ ,1 • ;\1 . ~f '\ ~ ft.•~ af~~,.,.tt••""' t>l• ----:;~ \,~:~!t !;~~ :O°':% 'el't,.,~~tt1ro~!t~"?; 1': ~~~ Cl t
j ~~ •~;::,.~o•/1 ~ ••=-~'l'r::~~-~(';',-t. .. f' I) at,I •~ M
lull\,,; ,1,fl,j' .. .-J\, 1...a1C•f'\fr;' ..... ti l'l~'loU,,C •!J ~-•'1 IQ !M,nQIII
•"MIi~ .... , • "'" "i,~tfl{J
~~
• (u ~ . ...-;.••~ • ~••N:M.d ••""''"'-' lf.J. tt 0('("1f<ll[ll ••· 'WC 1.11 +.tt:r,M ,.,.u,ro "~«<• -~~Y"trr '"~ c""'""•' ,r ••«to '"l II':""''""' 1(0,i,ll(e "'{• r ....... .,.~ •-.a-..: •"'f OIWil .. •"tc. ""ilflll.a1. l'i • t tit(._." •l(G,OI• l •<• 4"()11,, a, l\.~lff\, ,
«.'II¥•.(, "-'"' '""-• -i_, lll'llo._.* C'C"" t•f '""'\ ...... fl 11,1 i , IC ""'-'ttt' .... .,. .... l
.t.11'" .. tr.lO."IC••-C,HOl'(fllt
H ~-,:, "Ill .:-1 t.:.C• (l_;ug,,,, • ll""--'1. ·, IC"''"" l •
....,. A'1 t ....... ~ .. ·"""'''°""', ..... "' ,. .. ., ...... , .. o ... ,,._..
°"'I. 1 _..,,•ta.,., <ro•~ I••""'•'.( ----&U•\ !t'••,t ~•.1,lDP. ..... ~._ ..... ,
SJGN AGE /ftNCit:JG
~-........ ·"" 111(-.f .... :C,,'1.,,(-.Jf• ...... -..111.r:-,.. .. " ., .... , ... ••.:-.,."'4-•
._.;,,o.;.M. .. )lt. , .....
... ~ ,. "'....... .. .. -. -·· •:.I:.-·· ........... .
Off-SITE VDLIDES
••'l'f• ... ~ ........ ,1.,-t:• ' ... ' • ' "'. • "'"' .~ -◄ .. . r......iaa»._it.,••.... • ,r ... t ... .. • flf;..{.,..;,t ................ .
•0-to· ... •:t.• • ..,,t ,...,""( .. , h • •"-;•• • ,-,i,..-;i.,."' fl' ,~s,..c,o ,, 'loll ,,.,..,,.,f,f,or,i r, 1, •l•1-·, • hiJ ""' '-< n,,,"f •• :u, • ;.,,t••:•.~ lro-.(0:(IIIIC'MtJ#tl..,,..t,h f("""'ll"Mt-'t•• "1. •• •r"' h
.-i.l Ol'lll-"' "'"-••'"-14.~._T"I, ~h1t1rol ••• M~.-;J. ,. ••• t ~ .............. 1
!I,,( "'Oi!·~~ r/ •--t: t.-""' ~T 'l'rP'"I Jt.l•~ f COJ'l~l\A,:•,o(I ;<,
ON-SIJt UTIUTIES
PROJECT GUIDELINES
DtPMJt 5:Dal.AJl:Y PUO-AWDC,WOiT 2
~
J
J
z
1-z
t I I I
i i I I I I'
~
!I
~ <
I B', ,,.
-'I I I 1,
;;;;r;mrr I fl I II f)_
.IWC'IUVMan _____________ i•r~OlliaJ __
h ij I
I
I
~
I
I
I~,,
J • I
'-
EM'O.Qlf lliA
MAA'..EUV:M ln
l'S'AIMOAAOE'l
..
w~
3'~ ~~; ~ I¾
'-
£NVf!LOPI 11
~EtllflMIFT IM'--
lHlt'lll•E ~10
• ""'ElEV """ I ,.,,_,._, I
I
I
I
I
--""""'
----------------7
---------------7 I !~~ :U: U !Si~ 1~1 1 ~I
i lh'h
...
CM'CU) ... #J
.wt.ltlVMllrr t•rr~ QIUD(J
BUl.KPI.ANE
SSCTIONl3 ,u ...,.. ...
I I I v.-l ~.-
1 I
I
I
I
I "'
I
I _________ _J
MU't1£11 ..»n
(1f1 Atl(M O'WIIJ
L
I
I
I
I
·1t-,s ,,
I
I
~
{ ,
(SC .,..., ...
J ff ft=f========-= , , I
J = g SOtJIHt.MVIS/r(~.
'----
-,,,,,,,,1,,,,,,,,
j I I ,, It I
1. P OPOSED ENVELOPE PLAN
....
I ~"'8Pft IIO~ICJIP,l ~t'llll(tloQO,.~ --J Wt 'UIOII o.t•o,fll)o 111C 1'11111 I\DQII Dra~ 'OIi [-.GI ........,_ ._,~,. ~ ¥l M.IU !O IIIDOn;4D I f ti' ""70n
o-tfl M to~ t:,I ,_._OIUrOMlfl\MI
.) ()i!IIOCOnAl.~llM.ONOl,1'10M.CIJINISMAU.WV,,OK,OC
M MAJOWUW M.l:IIIO (J;~OH tle(pf rQII ninr n«II' 'PIIM:U.
"""· ,,~~~~C,,.ffl"-,t,ID
,0,.t1.WtCW'l1CtlllU.~,
OJ'IIIRII tOnMOJSO.,.AA/fft •JUI. ~'f
tOCnall>~ .. ~~t
IO'IICDI ...U • MCNIUM.tl ttOaf" lr,III
""""-MIONlt't'ltAMD
. £-i=~~t!f°::l~=
o-lU'I ANO lilSCNNC.CIUI 'Ort. rwt1, t1C.
i ::.,~~~~-=-Ni~NlltMAr . =~::-=~~-1(1·~ ... ==.-.~,tll~J'.:=~~~-==--=~1
l'Ultll C, 4 IIICSil:Olt:.tL .,..__ NO 4 "MlalN'I" Cl lrilt 01D1011
Pt.cl: Cf)lfCClQ Jg "1ff Ulllft 01tCJit ~ 4 Mlf n..oo111 0111 IIOO"~
\HT MG A "1Al.CDH1" VAY ■ OMlt INS(1 0111 "'°"CtlND hlClf i.l(
~~"=. :,-,:.~~~--= 1o""::«:;c:=--~~~'&-~~~=r:oi:..,
O'ODI "(11111(: 91M 4.I IIIOCt ,4IIOC N LOCII CiNIJIOIII 0, M -~~~cr=:~~~~~lt~~-1
El1DIDI WO.. 1MNI I rtrl ,t,IOC lie I.OIOl ~AIOI Of IC
TIJINIACt 0:Cl'Pf ,0-T,cWKt Df10U AS ,.AIII fl 1"t IUIUIIHII,
~m:~Jr.:, =~~::-::cu:.~~ .. ,.._.
? IIICIQI' D II«~ (~I ~ K SCMDID.,.._ ._.,..
'""-"'tlq,uMO'-'&l •~IOCn
I -.0A1 11C1M.C01l'Q~ I !01( •• 'W ..aGIC lll.li.DIJ,llj_,.,-
PROPOSED ENVELOPE PLAN
O(Jrf'iO SDaf.MY "-0-AWOOICNT 2
,.,.,,,-=·-"-=-=-:,.-"'-='-'-""""-----
Clfll~W. IY .a 0~1{ 1/11/0I '"'"
OIC~to IY OT HO.CCI; OIOJ 00 PUD-3
~
J
J
z
f-z
("\
V u
I I
I
ENVELOPE #3
l+-n-t ~ ........ -.........
♦MStM W¥
·~ , .... ~· .,., , ... , , ,
BULK PLAN E SECTION #3
SCAU:, l"'•,0'-0" .-~
f ti " ,,
r-----------------------,+-"""'"""
I I
I I
1-------------------------------t+,wn t,,tt1)
ENVELOPE #1
,,,,
ENVEL OPE #2
.. .
~LK PLA NE ~#1
SCAL.[ 1"•20'-0"' -~-, ,, JI j J
~
J
J
z
1-z
I C u
i.lC"Of~ll\.l,IC °""""..,_ (LOC,t,110fr4 lril,0' VNl'f) H-++++-H-+,H
+"''"'""" •-i
BULK PLANE SECTION #2
SCALC..1"•20'-o· ._:~
, ,, If .,
BULK PLAN E SECTIONS
otHWl'I SlWIHAIIY Fl.'0-AWENOMCNT 2 ·-·--·---~--,,~"""11'1' • r ... n: v n/Of l"t'
Ctl(Q((O I T a, ,..,,, OI0100 I PUD-4
•
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Date : April 21, W08 Initiat ed Py: I Agenda llem: 11 c I Human Resources Depanment
RECOMM ENDED ACTION
I Subject: A Resofulion Re-Appointing Hearing Ofl,cer~ I Slaff Source: Sue Eaton, Director 01 Human Resources
Staff recommends the Engle,,ood City C'luncil re-appoin~ by Resolution. those Hearing Officers on
the list approved in 2007 to hea r Merit and Disciplinary appeals.
BACkGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
The Englewood City Counci l passed Resolution No. 3, series of 2007 appoln1ing a panel of qua lified
Hearing Officers to hear Disciplinary and Merit Appeals. The panel, once established, may be re-
appoin1ed by 1he Council on an annJal basis.
UST OF ATTACHMENTS
Resumes of Current Panel of Hearing Oflkers
Resolution
BE . . IT . Al E, BERG
Law Offices of BcMcn Aisenbe,g, PC. Denver, Colotado, l9d'I -present
Pnnnc,, Gorsuch, Kirgis, Carnpl,ell, Walker and Grovei, Denver, Colorado, 195 8 -1980
B A , Economics, Brown University, 1952
LL 8 , Hazvwd Law School, 1955
US Almy, 1955 -1957
Mwquis Who's Who in Amciice
President, Brown Univc1sit)• Club of Colorado, 1967 -1970
P1csidcn1, Jlarv111d Law School Association of Colo1ado, 1984 -1985
Denvei, Colmado, Massachusclt!, and Amc1ican Bm Associations
Colorado Bill 1-oundation
A.melican Trill Lawycu As90Cialion
Colorado Tiial Lawyers Auociation, Bomd !'.iember, 1977 -1984; President, 1984 -
1985; Life Time Achievement Award, 1996
Lccnuc,, Colorado T1ial Lawyers Association, 1973-p1cscn1
Trial Lawyc1s fo1 Public Justice , Stale Cbai1pe.1son (Colorado)
Founding Membe1. Public Justice Foundati on
lntemationuJ Society ol Bani tcr
Ccrtific tion es a Civil Trial Advocate, National Boa,d of Trial Advocacy , 1984 -1994
Judicial Nominating Commission (Denver)• Gubernatorial Appointment, !988 • !994
Denve1 8111 Association -l'lesident 1991 • 1992 , 1 .:.c tee, 1982 • 1985, 1987 -1990; Repiescn1au,-c to Board of Oovemo1s of Colo1ado Bar Association, 1978 • 1980; Ch.a.upc1so0, Emcuainmcnt Comminee, I 975 -1977; Chahpe1son, l ask Fo1ce to Assess ugal System, 1985 -19 86 ; Award or Merit, 2003
Colo111do Bai Association -Presidem, 1998 -1999; Cbai1pmon, lntciprofessional
Comminee, 1978 -1980 ; Cbairpe1son, Al!Clnative Disputes Resolution
Committee on Employment, 1979 -I 980; Ethics Committee, 1986 -p1esem;
Amicus Cwiae Committee, 1991 -1994
lnstn1cto1, To11S, Unive1sityofDcnvc1,Scbool of Law, 1961 -1963
lnsnuc101, Real !:.state Law, University of Col01ado Extension School, 1960 • 19 63
lnsuuc101, National lnstilllle fo1 T!ial Advocacy, 1985. 1990
Ameiican Board of Trial Advocates
Na tionul Academy of Albiuators: Membe1 , Committee on Law and Legislation. 1986.
p1e:1ent: Rocky Mountain Region Cbaiipe!son, 1984 • 1985
Labot A1bit1at01, Fedc1ul Mediation and Conciliation Se1vice
•
•
•
•
•
•
Qual.1.ficat1.ons: RO::JJ.D J. ::or.z.t: 27~~ Xes: ,:~d A~~~ce DE~~•:, c::c:~jo E:221 ;:,J-<21 -"~.s ~
Ju=is Doct.or Degree
Uni,~r si:y of Denver
Jc...-:e, 1S68
Ac!:n:tted by Colcra:o Sc?:e~e Co~rt.
Oct.cber, 1968
Admicted by United S:a:es :istrict Court
October, 1968
Admitted by United St.ates Court of Appea ls
March , 1971
Ac!mitted by United States S~prerne Court
March, 1972
Ge~•=al Le;al Experience:
Sta:: Attorney
:ie~~•r ~e;al Aid So:iety -1969
.~sso•=iate Attorney
3erg~r, Rothstein & Gehler
Attorneys a t Law
Cowm~rce c;ty, CO -1970-1972
Partner
Ge hler & Cohen
Attorneys at Law
Comme r ce City, CO -1972-1982
Sole Practitioner
Ronald Cohen, Attorney at Law
Denver, CO -1982 lo ;>re~e:::
Mun icipal 3nd Governmental Lagal Experience:
Assistant County Attorney
Ada~s Coun Ly, CO -1970-1972
Assistant City At:01ney and Prosecu:i~g Attc1ney
Co~.r.-~r~~ City, CO -1970-1Q 0 2
l'!' !.t!..:U\ ug A:.:..1.. :1 ,• r;•ri.h;.e:-c:., :o -1 •' 0-19 Aesistant City Attorney a~j l~n.eccting h"" :ney Prighton, CO -:Q74 1982 City Attcruey Lafa)'<!tie, CO l91•·i990
1"1 r:1m,t1ul Hoa ring 01. C 1.ccr:
tfort h<,l l r•nn, CC>
B)ucl.h.,,_k , CO
Parker, co
1.lizabolh, CO
Littleton, CO
Englewood, CO
Judicial Experience:
?te~i<.li11g Judqe
tlort.hgJ .. nn, CO -l<tll2 lo prc•:1Pnt
Pt..,sjding .::uuqi,
Federal llcighl~, CO -1982-1 !l'.IU
Pre,ldcng Junge
Conunorce City, CO -JQ87 to 2002
Presiding Judge
Lochbu1e, CO -1999 to 2002
Presiding Judge
Hudson, CO -2001 to presenl
Administrative Luw Judge
Adams County, co -1908 to 1991
•
•
•
•
•
NAME: A)'IERICAN ARBITRA 110:-1 ASSOCIAT I0 :-1 RES DI E FOR)I C..Ues,one a ....... , PIii< 8010 Sow, Ccunty R..O 5 S..:e 206 • W·na•a< CO 80524 goo, • Telepl,ono 19:01 $30-2121 • F-0970) =2122 • John I'. DiFalco CURRENT B 1PLOYER/TITL E:
Self-employed• Arbi trator/J\.ledintor
Di Falco Corporation• President
OCCU PATION:
Anomc). Arbitrator
EXPERI ENCE :
Over 35 years of experience as a civil trial lawyer specializing in govcmmcnl, ndministrative.
and business contracl law including signfica nl expe ri ence in 1hc prac1icc of nrbi 1ra1ion .
medio1ion, and 01her form s of nltemu1ivc dispulc reso lution. As a municipal anomey.
participated in 1he const.ruc1ion manageme nt of major projects in lc uding perform ing ans center:
senior center: recreation faci lities: airpon impro,·emcms: and was 1ewa1cr. tnu1sponation. and
waterways. Fan1iliar "ith dispu1cs rcla1ing 10 differing site condi1ions: design defects: change
orders: surety bonds: and municipal. stale. and federal contract law. Possesses considerable
go,·cmmcnl experience. including ncgo1io1ions \\ith federal and state govcmmcnl agendcs in
c0Mec1ion \\ith the cons1ruction of public buildings. wastcwa1er and water trea1menL facilitie s.
transit systems. and airpons. Adjunct Professor Law 01 Regis University in Dcn,cr. Colorado.
Arbitra1or since 1980. As panelis1 for the American Arbi1ration Association and 1hc FcdcrJI
Medio1ion and Conciliation Service. has engaged in the practice of labor. commercial. and
construc1ion arbitration. mediation. and 01her altcmnli\'e dispu lc rcsolu1ion . Clients include
numerous public and priva1e ent ities 1hroughout the nation. Experience in mcdia1ing or
arbitrating cases invol\'ing arbi1 rnhili ty, contrnc t in1erprc101ion. delays. design dcfec1s. prodl1ct
liability, remedies. and many other issues.
ISSU ES:
Arbitrability. benefits. comract inLcrprellltion. discharge. discipline. di..crimination. external law.
gricmncc procedure. job assignmen1s. job classification. pay. senillrity. subcun1racting out.
tenure issues (higher cducalion). 1imclin,-s~.
I NDUSTR I F.S:
Entenaimnent. go,cmmcnt (federa l. s1nie and locul). grocery. higher education. meal packing.
mining. oi l nnd gas. postal. professional ~po ns. public utili 1ies. remit. schools. steel. 1clcphonc.
• 1mn~pona1 ion.
WORK HI STO R\': President. DiFalco Corporation. 1980-prcsent: Owner. John P DiFako & A~x:iates. r.c.. • 1987-~003: Cit) ,\nomey. Cit)' of Greeley. CO. J 980-1987: Chier Ncgmiator Labor Rela1ions Anomey. Cily C'oun l)' of Dcnwr. 1977-1980: Hearing Examiner. U.S. Pos1nl mice. 1972-1977: Anomcy & Labor Reln1ions Specialist U.S. Postal Sm ice. I 972-1977. Anomey. Rcol Esta1e il!ld Pmcur,·ment General Counsel. L'.S. Postal Sen·icc. EDUCATIO N: Ohio State University (BA-1965: JD -1968): Uni, crsity of Nonhem Colorado(~ IA-1986).
l'ROFESS ION AL ASSOCIATIO NS:
American Bar Association (Comminee on Public Employet Bargaining): Colorado Bar
Association (Labor Law Sec1ion): Federal Bar Association (Comminees on Public Sector Labor
Relations. Arbi1ration Commince, t111d Oflice Management Comminee): lndus1rial Relations
Research Association: Phi Deltn Phi International Legal Fraternity: lntcmntional Platfonn
Association; National Academy of Arbitrators.
PROFESSIONAL LICENS ES:
Admilted to the Bar: Ohio, 1968: Colorado, 1972: District of Columbia. 1987; U.S. District
Coun. Dis1rict of Colorado: U.S. C'oun of Appeals: Tenth t111d Federal (1986) Circuits: U.S.
Supreme Coun ( 1972).
PUBLICAT IONS AN D SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS:
·The New Ethics Resulations -Confusing and Likely to Be Cht111ged". POSTMASTERS
ADVOCATE. March 1991: "Sexual Harassme11: Rc,isited". POSTMASTERS ADVOCATE.
May/June 1989; "Supreme Coun Pennns Office Searches of Public Employees".
POST MA STERS ADVOCATE. December 1987; "Twen ty Rules for Effective Meaningful
Bargaining", POSTMASTERS ADVOCATE. August 198 7: .. Children as Negotiators: Is Theirs
t111 Acquired or Inherited Trait?". POSTMASTERS ADVOCATE. June 1987: "The Law and
Policy on Se~ual Harassment". NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES. 1984: "Collccti,·c
Bargaining ... NEW ENGLAND MUNICIPALITIES. 1981; reprinted. i':IMLO LAW DOCKET.
1983 and WASIIINGTON ASSOC IAT ION OF CITIES. 1983: ··Negotiation Impasse Planning ...
OKLAHOMA MUNICIPALITIES. 1981: '·Municipal Strike Planning··. C'OLORAUO
MUNICIPALITIES. 1980: SllPERVISOR·s GUIDE TO DISCIPLINE. 1979. revised 1985:
"MW13gement Negotiators: A New Breed". NA rlON'S CITIES. May 1978; "Rights of
Criminals While Incarcerated". OH IO STATE UNIVERSITY LAW JOURNAL. 1978:
DISCIPLINE AND GRIEVANCE HANDLING. I 973. revised 1986.
AL TE RNA T l VE DISPUTE RESOL UTION TRA INING:
Basic AAA Arbitrator Training. Ocn\'er. CO: AAA Ad,·anced Arbitrator Training. New York.
NY: Lnbor Arbitrator II. Phoenix. AZ: Advnnced Arbitrator Training. Phoenix. AL.
LOCA LE: Fon Collins. CO/Dcn\'cr. CO/Loveland, CO
•
•
•
•
•
/ /cA A RESOLUTIO , SETTING THE LIST OF PERSONS ELIGIBLE FOR APPOINTMENT AS HEARi 'G OFFICERS FOR DISCIPLINARY AND iERfT APPEALS . \\11 EREAS, 1hc Englewood Ci1y Council J>3SScd Ordi1l311Ce 'o.19. Series of 1996 1>hich mochlicd the Enslcwood Municipal Code m regard 10 d1sc1plinary and mcnt aPf1C:1ls: and
WHEREAS. Orduumcc 'lo. 19. encs of 1996 repealed the duties of1hc Englewood Career
Ser.ice Board and pro"idcd 1hat in numers of disciplmary and mcri1 appeals. the C11y Council
would appoint hearing officers 10 hold hearings and make findings and determina1ioru: and
WHEREAS, the passage of 1his Rcsoluiion will provide a list of persons for appointment as
hearing officers for a period of one ycru-and who may be reappointed by Council on an annual
ba.i ;
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNC IL OF THE CITY or
ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO.THAI :
~-The ily Coun~ll of 1he Ci1y of Englewood. Colorado, hereby approves 1hc
following persons for appoinlment as hearing officers for disciplinary and meril appeals by th e
Chy of Englewood :
Bcnncn S. Aiscnber@
Ronald J. Cohen
John P Difalco
ADOPTED A D APPROVED tlns 21st of April, 2008 .
ATTEST : James K. Wood" rd toyor
Loucrishia A. Ellis. C11y Clerk
I. Loucnshin A. Elli . C,ty Clerk for 1hc Ci1y of Englewood . Colorado . hereby cenify 1hc
nb<l\'C i a true copy of Rc,;olu1 ,on o. __ • Series of 2008 .
Loucris hia A. Elli s, Ci1y Cle rk
•
•
•
CO UNCI L COMMU NICATI ON Date: I Agendil Item: Subj ect: April ~I. 2008 11 cii A Motion Appointing a H earing 011ker Initia ted By: I Staff Source: Human Resources Department Sue Eaton, Direttor of Human Resowces
RECOMMEND ED ACTION
Staff recommends the Englewood City Council appoint, by Motion, a hearing officer fo r a
disclplina,y appeal filed by Rich ard Burto n.
BACKGRO UND, ANALYS IS, ANO ALTER NATIVES IDENTIFIE D
Per the City or Englewood Admini strative Policy Manual, H uman Resmirces Po licy No. ~4. when a
request fo r a hearing before a Hea ri ng Officer In connection with a disciplin ary appeal is flie d with
the City Clerk, the City Council will appoini a Hearing Officer from the panel appointed to hear the
appeal.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Appeal Request
Resumes of Po tentia l Hearing Officers
•
•
•
RECEiVED Cl7Y CF :,r •1·1-i.10. CO i::J l -: ..,r ·.-. tr'· ,., -.;. .. .:, .y, r OfFI C~ OF /:J: Cl n' OF ENGLE\\'0O0 A D.\IIN ISTRATl\'E PO.I IC\:. -• (I _ :....:....:..-=:....=.:.='-'-'-"=-"'-'-=""-'-"""-"-"-=-'-'"'-''-=-'-"'4'Hf~,c--F't_f TY CLt:RKcf.V . j I Richard Burton would like to u,llow my right as stated in the cities Adm inistrative
Policy Manual. This right is under Complaints. All fu ll time. r egu lar City emplovces.
DisciplinuY A ppeals. Procedure Step\'
Toe employee, wilhin 1cn (I 0) working days after rccc,pt of the no1icc o' , ,li,.c1plinary acuon.
may file a
complaint in wnting with the City Clerk rcquesung a hearing before n He.rm;, )fficcr. The
complaint will
smc the follow ing:
• Nature of the dispute
• What anempts the employee took 10 resoll'e the appeal
• Requested ;emcdy
Narun, of d1sp111c • DEMOTION of Position
AltcmplS 10 l'C$01l'c • Mectangs with Joe Payne . Maimc-nancc Manager
Ocruus Stc,wc • Plailt Manager
~tu Fotoda • U1ili1ics Director
Requested remedy • Obtam currcnl position
I am requcs · .,,,
SIGNED-;;:.,c-=.....:....,:::::,,;u::::_....::....;.._
•
•
•
BE:-1:\'"ETI S. AlSt.'IBERG
Law Offices of Bcrulcn S Aisenbe1g. J> C, Dcnvei, Colo1ado, 1980-piesei.r
PaUMI, Gorsuch, Kit&is, Campbell, Walker and Gtove1, Dcnve1, Colorado, 1958 ,go
B "-, Economics, 81own Unive1sity, 19S2
LLB, Hazvll!d Law School, 195S
US Almy, 195S-1957
Mwqui, Who's Who in Amclica
President, Brown University Club of Colorado, 1967-1970
P1 esidcnt, Harva,d Law School Associati on of Colo1ado, 1984 • 198S
Denver, Colo1ado, Massachusetts, and Ametican Baz Associations
Colorado B8t Fou~jation
American Trial Lawyeu A5SOCiation
Colonido Trial Lawyets Association, IBoai d Member, 1977 -1984; President, 1984 -
1985; Life Time Achievement Award, 1996
Lcctwc1. Colo1ado l rial Lawyc:s Association, 1973 • present
l 1ial l.awyets fo1 Public Justice, State Chaitpe1son (Colmado)
Founding Member. Public Justice foundation
lntcmotional Sucic1y of Bwristcrs
Cenification as a Civil l rial Advoca1c, National Board of 1 rial Advocacy, t 984 . 1994
Judicial Jliominoting Commission (Denver)• Gube, al Appointment, 1988 -1994
Dcovc, 8111 J\;wc:iatic,r. • Pics iden1 1991 • 1992; T1uslee, 19S2 • 198S, 1987 • 1990; Repicsentauve to Bo&ld ofGovcrno.1s of Colo1ado 8111 Association, 1978 • 1980; Ch.airpcuon, En1enainmcn1 Commir:tce, 197S • 1977 ; Chai1pe1 son, Task Fo1cc 10 Assess Legal System , 198S-1986 ; Aw111d ofMe1it, 2003
Colouulo 8111 Association • Prcsidrnt, 1998 -1999; Cbairpe1 son, lntcrp1 ofcssional
Commincc , 11}78 -1980; Cbairpeison, Altc1nativc Disputes Resolution
Commiuee on Employment, I 979 -1980; Ethics Committee, 1986 • p1csen1;
Amicu s Cwiae Commit! , 1991 • 1994
lns11ucto1, Torts, Univc ,sity ofDcnve,, School of Law, 1961 • 1963
lns11uc101, Real !:.state Law, University of Cclorado Extension School , 1960 -1963
Inst1ucto1, National lostit111e fo1 Tiial Advocacy, 198S -1990
Ameiican 80111d of T ti11l Advoca1es
National Academy of Alb i1111101s; Mcmbe,, Committee on Law and Lcgisla1ion, 1986 •
p1escn1 : Rocky Mountain Region Chairperson , 1984 • 1985
Labot A1biua101 , Fede1aJ Medial.ion and Ccnciliation Setvicc
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
Q-Jal1.!1c.ation!:: 2:::.:; t:es: 1::"ld ;._•.r=:?t:e :i~c.·:~:. c::c:a1o a:22: 3.t:?-,(2i ·1~:,
Juris :ioc:o: :>eg :ee
Unive:sity of Denver
Jene, :968
Admitted ~Y Colorado supreme Cour~
October, 1968
Admitted by United States District Court
October, 1968
Admitted by United States Court o f Appeals
March, 1971
Admit~ed by United States supreme Court
March, 1972
General Legal Exparionco:
Staff A:.tcrney
Denver !.egal Aid Society -1969
Associate .Zit torney
eerger, Rothstei~ & Geh:er
Attorneys st Law
Conmerce City, co -197C-1972
i'artner
Gehler , Cohtin
Attorneys at Law
Com.~erce City, co -1972-1982
Sole Practitioner
Ronald Cohen , .'It torney at Law
Denver, CO -1982 to present
Municipal and Governmental ~egal Er.pericnce:
Assistant County Attorney
Adams County, CO -1970-1972
Assistant City Attorney ,nd Fros~cuting At:orney
C~lMIHC:e City, c:i -131C-!982
I ~c •• i. :,g /\;~or y N:-r:::;lci.n, CO -J.:,10-19 •2 l\ss~s1:ant C. t~• l\tlcrnry a:,d rrc.~~cut, :,g A~~~ rnry BriQhton, co -19-~-;~e2 City .',ttorney l,aCa,•e:ce, CO 191 5-1 990
rurr:onnr.;l nearing Of'!.1.cer:
tiorthg I ·nn, CO
IIJ~~kh3wk, CO
J'arker, co
f;tizabetn, co
L,it tleton, co
Englewood, CO
Judicinl E>1>•rionce:
Pre~ i<.IJ 11g Jud(Je
Nort.hql!,1111, CO -19ll2 Lo pre: •t
Prcsi<.llng Ju<loe
Fe<.leral llelqhLo, co -1%2-J.,~:
Presiding Judgt>
Comrn~rce City, CO -1987 ~o 2002
Pre'1 ding Judge
Lochbuie, CO -1999 to 2002
Prf'Slding Judge
Hudson, CO -2001 to pres~nt
l\d.~ir1strative Law Judge
Ada~s County, CO 1988 t~ 199~
•
•
•
•
•
NAI\IE: AMERICA\ ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION RESL"'.'11E FORM CentrHto ne Bus iness Park 8010 Saulh County Roa<! S Suite 206 • Win dsor CO 80528·9004 • Te lephone (970) SJ0-2121 • Facsm,le (970 1 SJ0.2122 • John P. DiFalco CURRENT EMPLOYER/flTLE:
Self-employed -Arbitrator lMedia1or
DiFalco Corporation -President
OCC PAT ION:
Anorney. Arbitrator
EXPERJE CE:
U,·er 35 years of experience as a civil trial la \lycr special izin g in govern :, ent . admi ni s1ra1i,·e.
and business contract law including signficant experienc e in the practice of arbitration.
media1ion. and other forms of alternative dispute resolu1ion. As a mw,icipal anorney.
panicipated in the construction management of major projects il'lcuding perfonning arts ce nl er
senior center: recrea tion facilities: airport improve mem s: and wastewater. transportation , and
waterways. Famili.ir with dispute re la1in g 10 differing site con dit ions ; design defects: change
orders: sure ty bonds ; and municipal. stale . and federal contract law. Possesses considerable
government experience, including nego1iations with federal and sta le government agencies in
connection with the construction of public buildings . wastewater and water treatment facil it ies.
transit systems, and airports. Adjunct Professor Law at Regis University in Denver. Colorado .
Arbi1rator since 1980. As p·,nelist for the American Arbitration Association and the Federa l
Mediation and Conciliation Service, ha s engaged in the practice of labor. commercial. and
construction arbi tration , mediation. and other alternative dispute resolution . Clients include
numerous public and private entities throu ghout the nation. Experience in mediuting or
arbitrating cases invo lving arbitrability , contract interpretation. del ays , design defects. product
liability. remedies. und many other issues .
ISSUES :
Arbitrability. benefits. c<>'nract interpretation. discharge . di scipline . discrimination. extemal law.
grievance pro cedure. jo !.i assignments. job classifica ti on. pay. seniori ty. subco ntract ing ou t.
tenure issues (hig her educat ion). timeliness.
I 'DUSTRIES:
Enterta inment. goYemment (federal. state and local). grocery. higher education. meat packing.
mining. oi l and gas. postal. professional spons. publ ic utilitie s, relai l. schools. steel. telephone .
• transportation .
WORK HI STORY: President Difolco Corpomtion. 1980-prcscnl: (h111cr. John P. DiFulco & AsS<,datcs. l'.C.. • 1987-2003: Cit y AttMlC)'. Cit y of Greeley. CO. 1980-1987: Chief l\cglltiU tl'r Labor Rcluti llns Attorney. C'i1y/Coun1y of Denver. 1977-1980: lkaring Examiner. L'.S. l'ns1a l SerYice. 1972-1977: Anome) &. Luror Rc:J1ions Specialist t 1.s. Pos1al Sen·iec. 1972-1977. Anomey. Real Es1a1e and Procurcmem: General Coun.1el. LI .~. Pos1al Scn·icc. EDUCATION: Ohio S1a1e Universi1y (BA-1965: JD-1968\: Uni\'crsi1y ofNonhem Colomdo lMA-19861.
PROFESSIONAL ASSOC IATION S:
American Bar Associolion (Commincc on Public Employee Bargaining): Colorado Bar
Associa1ion (Labor Lnw Sec1ion): Federal Bar Associa1ion (Comminecs on Public Sector Labor
Rela1ions, Arbi1ra1ion Commince. and Office Managemem Comminee): Industrial Rela1ions
Research Associa1ion: Phi Della Phi ln1Emn1ional Legal Fra1em11y: ln1ema1ional Platfonn
Associa1ion: No1ional Academy of Arbi1ra1ors.
PROF ESSIO NAL LI CENSES:
Admi11ed to 1he 8111: Ohio. l 968; Colorado. 1972: Dis1ric1 of Columbia. I 987: U.S. Dis1ric1
Court. Dis1ric1 of Colorado: U.S. Cou n of Appeals: Temh and Federal ( 1986) Circuits: U.S.
Supreme Coun ( 1972).
PUB LI CATIONS AND SPEAKI NG ENGAGEMENTS:
"The New E1hics Rcgula1ions • Confusing and Likely 10 Be Changed'", POSTMASTE RS
ADVOCATE, Morch 199 l: ··Sexual Hnrassmcnl Re1•isi 1ed'". POSTMASTERS ADVOCATE.
Moy/June 1989; ··Supreme Court Penni1s Office Searches of Public Employees",
POSTMASTERS ADVOCATE. December 1987: ··Twcmy Rules for EfTec1ivc Meaningful
Bargaining", POSThlASTERS ADVOCATE. Augusl 1987; "Child~n as Ncgo1ialor1i: Is Theirs
an Acquired or lnheri1ed Trait?"". POSTMASTERS ADVOCATE. June 1987: "The Law and
Policy on Sexual Hnrnssmcnf'. NATION AL LEAGUE OF CITIES. 1984: ··CollectiYc
Bargaining''. NEW ENGLAND MUNlCIPALfTlES. 1982: reprimed. NIMLO LAW DOCKET.
1983 and \V ASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CITIES. 1983: ··Nego1ia1io1, lmp.'ISSc Planning··.
OKLAHOMA MUNI Cll'ALIT!ES. 1981; ··Municipal Strike Planning··. COLORADO
MUNICIPALITI ES. 1980: SU l'ERVISOR'S GUIDE TO DISCIPLINI~. IQ7Q, revised 1985:
"Management Nego1iu tors: A New Breed·•. NATION'S CITI ES. May 1978: ·•Rights of
Criminals While lncarcera1ed'". OHIO STA TE UNIVERSITY LAW JOURNAL. l 978:
DISCIPLINE AND GR IEVANCE I IANDLING, 1973. re\'ised 1986.
ALTERNATIVE UI SPllTE RESOLUTION TRAI I G:
Basic AAA Arbi1ro1or rroining. Denver, CO: Ai\A Advanced Arbi1ra1or Training. New York.
NY: Labor Arbilmtor ll. Phoenix. AZ: Advanced Arh i1ro1or Training. Phoeni x. AZ.
LOCALE: Fon Collins. CO/Denver. CO ILo\'clnnd, CO
•
•
•
•
•
COUNCIL COMM UNI CATION Date: Subject: April 1 1, 2008 Agendd ll em: 11 c ,ii Approval or Purd1a,e of Backhoe Initiated By: Staff Source: Depar1ment of Publ,c Worls Rick Kahm, Director
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Ci ty Council approved the purch~se or an al~wheel drive back hoe In the 2008 Public lmpro,enw .• 1
Fund {PIF) budget.
RECOMMEND ED ACTION
Staff recommends Coun ci l approve, by Motion, the purchase of a Caterpillar 420E Ba ckhoe from
Wagner Equipment Company In th e total amount or $71 ,172.
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, Al~O ALTERNATIVES IDENTI FIED
TI1e Public Works Department Joes not have a backhoe. Adding this backhoe will greatly Increase
productivity and flexibility. This additiona l piece of equipment will also be beneficial in
accomplishing our commitmen ts for snow aba temen t as well as oth er stree t maintenance projects.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Piggybacking on the Colorado 0eparlment ofTranspor1atlon's contract, Award No. 31 1000051, the
total ptuchase price of $71,172 for th is backhoe Is less than wha t we woul d be able to get through
our own Individual bidding process. This acquisition was included in the 2008 l'IF and adeqt1ate
funding is available.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Surnma,y Speci fica tion Sheet
Options Sileet
CDOT No1lce of Award
•
•
•
SEIH 'ICF:NT£1l <;A RAGF. Sl ~1\IARY SPECIFICA , 'llN SHL:ET FOK >,;EW \ 11 ICWLES SrATEAWAKIH f00=T~A~w=anl~3~11=()(=)()(=)=5~1 ________ _
ENGLEWOOD Ill()# _______________ _
MANUFAC l'URER OF VEIIICU: __ C=a=tc=m=il=la~r _______ _
MOl>EL OF VEIIICLE __ __,4""'0.,_.E .... · __________ _
AIR CONUITIONING
AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
POWER WI NDO WS
POWER DOOR I OCKS
4 WI !EEL DRIVE
FLEX FUEL OP I ION
CE RF REPLACEMENT
NEW AOOI rlON TO FLEET
YRS
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
OEl'AR I MEN r VEI IICLE ASSIGNED TO Street Department 021003
COMMENTS:
llnckhoe ourshose price js $70,672.00. Additional Shop/S,·rvicc manual SSOO.OO.
Total mice s1 1.1.n.oo,
0 11.!_iu11, 11 .,hi< It, ) ' ---I l I r,m1 li111rtl·d ,hp d1lk•h.'tH1,1I 1.;/A ' '"'''~'P·II\.') h,:lh -!!HI lih\'I ., 1110,fll) 1 I~ llh.h h.1dhnr lil-.1~> dltl,, ll\.'lh.ht~ h11<~l'l l 11 ·•.110 ----I, ~-1 1ru.;h h;u.:~hrn.: hl".I\, ihu,, 1n:111.hlll£ h11d1..·t --,.I lllK_._IH_I __ ' I ,h:11dcd \\ :ur.1111~. 1'11.-.1,l· ,lll,h.h d1.·,1.111,t1t1n NI,\
(,, ,\Jd1111,11al l1,1n, m.11111.11 1,0,\!II --,\,W.iT.·,1al !-ih;r ;:-c--;:, i:.· 111,11\U,tl 7
~
..-}Otl,_!10 __
X \J11i1i,mal 0Jl<'r,n,·r, 1~1.11 ----,._'!.~!!.,_
";j l'.111, < 1).1(()\I lnc-lud 1•d -Ill ,1,,,,; Sen ice ('1).1(()\1 i:0 __
II ( 'olnr;,..lf'\ lkpJrtm.:-111 ,,1 I r,1n,1'k1rt311nn C\fJngc CC'lt1r I he pa1111 <hall ,o orm '"Cl'IM "' o .. r .. 111 llulu, "' 1-) I 01c1zkr. Mll ,,, I nnr,~r• \(Mllt,0()
(lr.1n~S ·
12 FrurH l't•llll ll'J"Wi' iJ;l1l 1 IOI I lht---I ',hfl. lJII
I.I K.111,• tJIIH r ,1 J t,)'h l +'Pl 12•,~. (l(I
I I. Su-1hi l izcr ..B_11,11d11 '.Oll .00 --I~-Mh::lw I in Ti rt''"-1 lMI.IJII
t(, firt"IHVll r·111\a\ i,q\ Tit::!_ I /~O .110 ----
'7 -,~ ----I'>. -----------:n
•
•
•
NOTI CI:: OF A WAR D C'OLORA llO 0El'A lffME NT O F TRANSPORTATIO \II \Rll l\t ,\tlll'.R JIIOOOO~I Rr: IO\lta1 i<ln For Uid ~ lli\i\ 0 7-1127 \t M I 1t11J,1SNOl 1\l't·Rn11,1 ORlll .R SIi t-.On l'l'tlod CO\tr td: h-l~IJ-lhro f,..JO•U~ llltOII') Oplion to rtnt'" for l )HI'\ -IMOIC ETO: I E.''i DOII NO. 1000175 lnuu.x aJJfN ,,n l'wd~ OrJn t,N l ,.-.-..... 'I.ale I l'ENDOR NA ME: \I •Jn<r f.qulpmrn1 C'o. AtC"t'K'K"'<,., ln..arcut n.'f'l,-lnd poh,.,.-.. 1 ,uhJ"t'"~ AllORESS: 18000 !.mlth Rnad
Aurora, CO 80011
I
l rnNTAf,: Ptlt llortr I ~llONt,: JOJ 7J9 JOOO
t'AX NO: JOJ 7J9 J20?
OELl \lt'.RV : 120 d•>•
COM MODI l'Y NUM HRS:
I
76004 -Tr.K:hW'. Loader I\DtlhOt:'
L
·, his awurd is for All Wheel Drive Loader. n:,ekhoc s per the lcnns, condit io ns, and spceifica1i o ns of
l'DUT bid I IAA 07-027 MM .
Make nnd Model ol' unit selec ted : Ca1erpillar 420E
Did price per uni t before opti ons
Op1ions Available: Sec Page Two
$70,672.00
Condi lions or AM ud: Award 1s made 10 obove refe renced vendor for ,upplyin& the co1111nodi1ylscrvlcc speci fied obove
and on any a1tachcd sopplcmenlnr) poges pcr bid spcdficuuon, 10 be ordered on un ·as needed" hasis for lhc period fmm
date of aW3rd 1hrough 6.'30108. ""h 1"0 (2) one year renewal periods. 01 COO r option This •"•rd is in 1carONll or 3
p<ossibl• >""" tot•! Procc:s shall be, nnn 1hrough 1hc f11>t 12 rnon1hs or awnrd. Requom for any pro(lond prk•
l hangcJ aner lht' One 12 mon ths must br submitted along wilh .supporting dorumt.ntalion, to COOT PurrhasinJ!,
• minimum n[•l•lr /60) dn1• prior 10 lh< proposed cffcclivt date or such change. A new •"'Old noloct "ill h< ,ssocd
r,-., each 11Jd11ional renewal )<.V 1h;i1 CUOT «k-c1s. Fl 11 IER PA RTY MAY CANnL ON 30 DA VS \\ R01 hN
NOl lC E.
M>IL.1ll15AWAKOISA NOl'll.l ot 1,;n NT Jlll'\ll!t11A~I ONI Y VARIOUSl1>0f PLIL'il)~",tLASM IIN l>l411J ORIN R
MATI.RIALS MAllKIAI (JIUllRro11v11x,r nlAHl,.,'TS5"00000UIORtPLKm•tORAGUltlGATI .Ml"\TDI t*lllKll>\111
1'1'k(11A\I •*llfK ()11IIR(1.tlflAIX)MAILAhlNl11,.lt.'\rm11K>NSllRl'OI \I !>UllOfVl!,U<\•"Yl*IHR•IAIIKIAI~
IIMIJH>NTIIISAWAKll A(,! >I( II \01111 R TIWHll(JI l>ltlM KIN<,MAfUW H .u DON11115AWAMOMl/\11MtlM R VIA 1111 IR
OWNl'I KlllA\I (>flllf M SVHf\l mm-..111 OMV IU Kl Sl'ONSIRII roR MATl:KIALOIUJERU>ANl>KI l"IIVIUIIYlr ti\)
1111,\Nlll II \ /\kl(ilblKAt!Ul l).11-\ A KL '>lll I OUIII\ A 14.llkll IJ\!IINlllll,5.l!Kflll!lJ/ WJLllll ~ 111!1'\)N L>U\IAI.
Kl IJl/ll\l.MI NT S
!'lease direc1 ll"lu,ne~ on 1his •"·"J 10 CDOT
l'urcha""ll-phone lOl 7S7 9798
""' 303 7~7 %(,q
Appro~ By:
Michael Moore. CPl'll. l'un-h:,,ing Agenl
•
•
•
COUN CI L COMMUNICATION Date: Subject: A11ril 21, 2008 Agenda It em: 11 C Iv Beneficial Use arm actor Purch,,se lnilialed By: Staff Source: L/E WWTP Superviso,y Commlnee Stewart H. Fonda, Utilities Director
Jim Tallent, Operations Division Manager
CO UN CI L GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUN CIL ACTION
Council approved the capital purchase of one, low ground pressure, rubber tra.:ked, farm tractor in
the W08 budget.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff r~fll
1
e nds Co uncil approve, by Motion, the purcha~" of one, low ground pressure, rubber
lracke\./raclor from Jo hn Deere, Inc. (Model 8330T) in the amount of S138,959.62 .
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, ANO ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
A farm lraclor is used to apply slabillzed wa11ewa1er biosolids in a beneficial use program. The 4-
wheel drive, farm tractor being replaced is currenlly 20 years old and will be trad.,d-ln with this
1r,1nsactlon. The recornmendalion for 1he purchase of a low ground pressure, rubber !racked farm
lractor Is being made for !he following reasons:
• Field access is Improved when weather and/or ground condition< limit lhc operation.
• Soil compaction is reduced. Repetiti v~. close row app lication of blosollds wi th a rubbe r
tired tractor result s In more deep soll compaction. Low axle loads on a rubber tracke d
tractor reduce this deep soil compaction allowing for Increased crop yield. This Is an
important farm management consideration.
• Ground slip is reduced (tire spinning or slipping) by appro~imately 50% resulting in less
field damage.
lohn Deere, Inc. and AGCO Corp. have current cooperative bid. S°' emment pricing agreements
lhrough MAPO. Allhough Jolm Dene 1s the recommended purchase unit due to operator
familianl)I and price, comparati\e e\'alua tion was conducted w,lh a s;milar tractor offered by
AGCO.
FINAN CIAL IMPACT
The cost of tl,is expe nd itLire will be shared 50/50 hy the Cities of Englew0<,d ,111d Ll ll le ton.
Pu rch,1Se pri ce Is 1mder the budge led amlllmt for thi~ unit.
LIST OF ATTAC HM ENTS Capl1al Ou1lay Reques1 Equipmenl comparison Pnce quo1e irom lohn Deer, Inc. Recommendallon for Purchase •
•
•
• CAPITAL OUTLAY REQUEST ! Dcp.inmcm: LI:. W\l'rP I l·umlm1vi--inn. <>0-I'02-61401 Description of equipment or ohjcct expenditure: Tracked fonn tractor Explanation of necessity or bcnclits of this expenditure:
Original form tractor wns purchased 20 years ago and in need of replacement due to age.
Total costs of placing
eouiomcnt in full operation:
Estimated Costs Unit Cost Total Cost
PurchaM: Price 185.000 185,000
Installation
Total 185,000 185,000
Less T rade-1 n
Total I let Cost
Annuol Qpcratimi Cost
Total First Year Cost 185.000 185,000 • Is this ~xpenditure necessar,· because of increased personnel?
No
Rl'Commendaiion for equipment displaced:
Auction unit
Approximate date of purchase:
Spring 2008
List and describe similar equipment in department:
John Deere 82\JOT -tracked fonn tmctor
Purchasing Agent's Comments:
City Manager"s Review: Approved: Not Approved: __
•
•
•
•
Tethnkwl E,·alualion for Lo" Ground Pre-1s ur.-, Hub her 'frackcd. f\1rm Trnelnr SM<"inration John Deere M11nurur1urrr model numbtr mo r ms PlO Ill') TRACTOR lb•sr nrkc) $208.646 ,2 8 OPTIONS llduunb $1,291.68
llclun comfort nackaPt SI.I Sl.28
Drh1n winus Inc.
ISO l 178J 9-nin connr<tor Inc.
81tttrl<s, with dis<onnttt Irk..
Otlun lk>hts Inc.
57« Dlsnlactiatot hvdr1ulk numn S70740
Wlrln• Melo,., Inc.
15" Gtntnl a• bel15 Inc.
lbdar with dual beam SCAJOr $792.72
R.od lo $639 36
Luther trim /r,oulrtd wllh ,omrorl n•rk•e•J $1,454.76
Anttnna Mount $117.72
Warnln• beacon $301.32
Exlremflv ll•hlln• Inc.
Cate•orv 4 drawbar $727.92
Wide mid-roller onlion $1 ,51 4.16
Cold WHlhtr Sll rt kll $1 20%
MAPO Discounl -$60.517.96
(21%\
Sul>-To11I $155,797.60
Creustor dls•la•• SJ ,814.1 I
AUIOtra( 1rtn'11ioa 1· S2.l32.80
Slorfire ITC rtttiV< $1.9-IS.I I
Frttwavc radio• ...
Au lo-Culdt' ...
JO 4450 l rado-allowanre -S2S 000
Total S t JB,959.62
NI • none md1ca1cd
l'hallcnecr M1755ll ,~-151'10 111') $193.027 Sl.189.00
SI.Sl4 .00
$52600
$1 .268 00
$16S.00
$21600
NI
$84 .00
$2,68700
$600.00
NI
SI 514.00
$104 ,00
$536.00
$392.00
NI
Sl.473.00
NI
-SSl ,S2l.7S
12s•\\
SISS.471 .25 ... ...
...
$2,550.00
$9,09 1.00
NA 1-S2S,000l''
$142 112,25
• OPS options aid in biosoli<ls nppliculion documcntulion required fo r rcgulnwy reporting
•• Trade-in quole only offered 1hrou i;h John Deere• applied 10 AGCO price for comparison onl y
•
•
•
22 January 2008
Mr. Dirk Banks
JOHN DEERE Wor ldwide Consumer and Commercial Equipment 2000 John Deere Co mpany Cary, NC 275 13
Multiple Assembly of Procurement Officials (MAl'O)
200 Water Avenue
Berthoud , CO 80513
Ow Mr. Banks:
S~ECEIVEO Or al e Copv
This memo is to requc,;t an extension and update to our MAPO Contract #002-98 as
follows ldiscount remains the same):
Price Boo k Desc ription Discount from Price Due
Tab MSRP Dat,· -LIO Hand-Held / Portable Power Eo uipment 10% 19Dcct!7
LIS Walk -Behind Products 10% 19Dec07
L21 Residential Zero-Tum Radius Mowers 15% 15Jan08
L25 Lawn Tractors (except 100 Models) 20% 15Jan08
• 100 Series Models• •o• 15Jan08
L30 Lawn and Garden Tractors 25% 15Jan08
L35 Eguiomen t for Riders and Tractors 25% 15Jan08
L40 Comoact Utility Vehicles & Equipment 18% 01Nov07
C !O Commercial Wal k-Behind Mowers 25% 15Jan08
Cl3 Commercial ZTRAK Mowers 25% 30Nov07
C l5 Commercial Fron: Mowers 25% 19Dcc07
C l 8 Wide Area Mower 25% 01Nov07
Cl9 Advantal!.e Compact Utility Tractors 5% 15Jan08
C20 Compact Utilitv Trac tors 20% 15 Jan08
C25 CC'mpact Utility Tractors Equipment 20% 15Jan08
C27 Tractor Loader Backhoe 25% 01Nov07
C30 Utility Tractors 28% 01Nov07 (Also listed in A2 -Ag Tractors)
Equipment for Utility Tractors
I-
C35 (Also listed in A9 -Material Ho.ndlin2) 28% 01 Nov07
C40 Utility Vehicles 21 ¾ l5Jan08
I
C41 GIO Gl5 G20 G25 G30
A2
AS
A6
A7
A9
AIO
Hi2h-Performance lluliry Vehicle 21% 15Jan08 Reel Mowers 21% 15Jan08 Special Application Mowers 21% 15Jan08 Special Aoolication Vehicles 21% O!Nov07 Aerati on 21% 01Nov07 Debris Maintenance 21% 01Nov07
Tractors 28% 01Nov07
Hay and Fora,lle 28% O!Nov07
TiUa2e 28% 01Nov07
Air Seedinl?IPlantine/Drills 28% 01Nov07
Material Handling 28% O!Nov07
609-CX20 Rotary Cutters 28% 02Jan08
AMS (A2 Mana1tement Solutions) 28% 01Nov07
I have enclosed a CD-Rom of our cWTcnt price pages and New Products 2008, however
our 2008 Purchasing Guide has not anived Into our office yet. I will forward a copy of
this guide e.s soon as possible.
•
Should yo· 1 have any questions please contact Bill Frank, Sr. Account Mllllagcr, Direct •
Govemmm' Sales at 972-317-S976 (fonkWjlliamD@JohnDcere .com) or myself a1 !119-
804-2245 iJ I cJvDarlt.ne@JohnDeere.coml.
We look torward to continuing our relationship and await your not1tication of acccptanc:.
Regards, 1.\~C\.J>~
D~neJudy T
Contract Administrato
JudyDarlcnc@JohnDccrc.com
cc: Bill Frank
Sr. Account Manager
Encl:
•
•
•
•
JOHN DEERE GOVERNMENTAL STATE CONTRACT SALES INSTRU CTION S (Agency) In order for the Governmental Sales Department 10 provide the BEST customer sctVicc possible lo all John Dccrc dealers and slate agencies. we request the following: I. All govemmenlal state contract purchase orders must be 1.1ade out to Jobu Deere
Co mpany ; 2000 Jobn Deere Run; C ary, NC 27513 as lbe vendor; otherwise, will
!!21 be accepted ,
2. lf a price quote is needed please c.insull your nearest dealer or dealer of your
choosing. Contract pricing should be consistent regardless where you receive this
information.
3. Please list all information available (models, codes, prices, etc.) to help expedite your
order. This will help the order coordinators at John Occrc Company to process your
order and equ ipment faster.
4. Please indicate the delivering dealer that you will like to receive your equipment from
in the body of the purchase order. Place the dealer's name, address, telephone
number, and dealer number, if known .
5. John Dccrc Company will invoice you once the equipment has been delivered. Please
do !!21 make payments to the dealer but mnit payment to: Jobn Deere Company,
21748 Nehl'ork Plac,; Chicago, IL 60673-1217.
Should you have any questions regarding this request, please contact the Government
Sales Dcparoncnt al 1-800.358-501 0, option I, option I.
Thank you
Raleigh Governmental Sales Department
Darlene Judy, Contract Admi nistrator
•
•
•
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Da1c:
Dennis S1owc. l'lanl Manage r
Jim Tallenl Operations Division Manager
April 10, 2008
Subj ect: Technical Evaluat ion and Recommendation for Purchase of One Low Ground
Pressure. Rubber Tracked Farm Tractor
A fom1 tractor is used lo apply stabil ized wastewater biosolids in our beneficial use program.
The 4-whccl drive farm tractor, originally purchased for this program . is current ly twc1 years
old and recommended for replacement in 2008. This purchase ,vus budJlctcd and approved in the
2008 Benefi cia l Use budget
1 n.-commcnd the purchase of one. low ground pressure, rubber tracked. farm 1ra1.1or from John
Deere, Inc. (Model S330T) in the amount of $138,959 .62. This price incl udes a $25,000 trade-in
allowance for the JD 44 50 tractor. being replaced.
This recommendation for a low ground pressure. rubber tracked fann tractor is being mudr r ir
the following reason s:
• Field access is improved when weather and/or ground conditions limit the operation.
• Soi l compDction is reduced. Repetitive, close row upplicn1i on of bi oso lid s wi1h a
rubhcr 1ircd tractor results in more deep soil compaction. Low a.xle loads on a rubber
tracked tractor reduce this deep soil compaction allowing for increased crop yield.
TI1is i~ nn important fo nn munnge mcnt considen11ion.
• Ground slip is reduced (lire spinn ing or slipping) by approximately 50% resulting in
less field damage .
John Deere, Inc. and AGCO Corp. currently have cooperative bid, govcnunent pncmg
a1Jreemcn1s through MAPO (Colorado Multiple Assembly or Procurement Officials). Although
John Deere is the recommended purchase unit due to price and operator familiarity, comparative
cvalumion was conducted with u ~imilar tractor offered hy AGCO .
•
•
•
COUNCI L COMM UN ICATI O N Date: Agenda Item: Subj ect: Apnl n 1008 11 C \ Tr ansiormer Replacement ProJell 1or 1he Allen Filter Planl Initiated 8):
U1lhtles Oepartmeni I Staff Soura:
Stewart H. Fonda. Oore<lnr of U1ih1,es
COUNCIL COAL ANO PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
The aransformer was ordered In lul\ of 2007 from Medium Voltage Accessories (MVA) under
purchase order #71170 for 1he amount of $46,::?35.
RE COMMENDED ACTION
The U1lll1les slaff recommen ds Counci l approve, by Moti on, a bid for l11e inslallation of ,1
transformer, switch and other lmprovemen 1s In ihe amounl of S 106, 115 from Glaser Elec1rlc
Company
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, ANO ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
The original transformer "as 1ns1alled in 1952 by Public Service Company, '"th a newer
transformer lnslalled In the 1980s. A secondary 1ransformer and swi1ch are critical during various
e, ems 1ha1 creaae power outages from Xcel Energy, with the existing lr.lnsformer becoming 1he
backup transformer. Aho, the anticipated UV disinfection s1-s1em 10 be installed at the Allen Filter
Plani in 1he ne~I 110 -1 years" 111 increase lhe planl load, making a secondary aransformer crucial
Because of a lead lime of 35 to 37 \\eeks, the transformer and S\\ itch was ordered from MVA in
lul1•, 20( 7. This \\Ill allow 1ht ne\\ l ansfonner to be online by the summer of 2008.
The proposed bid Is 10 pro, idea qualified contractor 10 ins1all 1he purchased transformer, s, .. 1ch
and other lmprowments. The selected contractor will also pro,ide the concrete, fencing. elec1rical
and asphalt work for the pro)ecL
For 1he Transformer Replacemenl Pro1ec t #IFB-08-J 00, Requests for Bods were sent to sl,, endors.
A bid opening was held on MMch 1i, 1006, n,e lollo" ing responses "ero! received:
Sturgeon Elec1ric
lnterna 1ional Pm,er Si·stems
Glaser Eleclric
SI 14,24q,55
, · )9,850,00
J6,1 15,00
It should be no1ed 1ha t the bid 1rom Glaser Elec1rir was sub101t1~d on li me but die document wa1
mis-flied and 1he bid w,,s nol read aloud ,11 1he bid opening. Internationa l Power Sys1ems' bid was
read aloud JI 1he hid opening .,nd ,it th,it time was consldPred lhe lowes1 ,1tcept,1ble bid. Cl,1,er's
bid" as disco, ered al a btd op;,nlng held later on the da} and \\o uld Im e been the lo" est acceplJbfe bid had ll been read aloud and nol been mos-filed. The error" as en111e~ the C •lY s, bul 10 be rair 10 Glaser, il \\'JS determined their brd \\Ould be considered and proposed 10 Council The bid is not considered approwd until Council appro, es il so lhe bod "as no 1 a" ardt>d al the 1,me the bids "ere read. lntematlonal Power S1~1ems has sent a teller tallached l protesting the bid Council ma1 request staff 10 reopen 1he bid process but this "outd incur add11ionat hme and t'\pense ",lh llnle chance 01 changing 1he ou1come.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Glaser Electric Company Is the recommended low, ;ccep1able bidder for the Transformer
Replacement Project #IFB-08-100 in the amounl of S 106, I I 5. The U1ili1ies Department budgeted
S90.000 In the 2008 Budget for this project. Additional funds are avai' ·'>le in the Waler Fund.
Brown and Caldwell has revle\\ ed and approved tl1e recommended a .• eptable bidder.
LI ST OF AlTAC HMENTS
Bid Tabulation Sheet
Lener from Brown & Ca ldwell dated April 7, 2008
Lener from International Power Systems dated April 9, 2008
•
•
•
• City of Englewood Sid T1bul.tton Sh•t ____________ _, Bid Opening O.tl: Ilardi %7, 2008 10:00 ■,m. ITEM BID• IFB-08-1 00 Tl'IMformer Replacement Adclenctum
Vendot Btdlloncl Total 11111 ~ CE,,_.,...,.
I/Wlld.,,,...'1 • NO_,
NUN··· Unlttl
Dlmw,CONlfl
GJNrs.c.11:eama.ty ,,.,.,....,. YDl\'E'I • 10lt1UG NoMnaad ,.,,,........,~
---•INld,COIOff2 _._
0on-. ... vn,ra • ,..__. i-....i
111•111•A--. tE,COIONO ,,_.,....
~--TJUIII YalYES I 1-.-.oo .......
flfJWC.WAN
i-.comu
(--.,Ben1c
....... mall • . NO_, un,,..,_,,,c,
'«;gltffJ ,,.,._.
JMtt 1'J041f,fl fl • . NO•D ,,,,_,.,,
M!WW,COIOfH
•
• ..
•
•
I ~ I ,k II 10 \ ,. ...,.,, !•Ii (N~r 1,.J,,u ,I,,"' l lll lrl., \ :w •~u In •.t.!"' •I\.,& April 7. ~008 Bill ~lcConmck Operation, Supennlcn<km • Uuluies
IOOO Englewood Parkway
Englewood, CO ROI 10
Subject E,oluouon ufCon1ractor's Bid for lnsi.llnlion ofTronsfom,er & Swuch
Dear Mr. MeC ?nmck
Al your request I haec n:,•1c" rd lhe bid tabulouon onJ lhc detail• of the Gltier Eloctne bid
nnd ha,c 1hc follo"·ing com1~:n1s ;
All bids were rcsronsive nnd there were no exccp11ons lnken by uny of the lhn:c bidden.
~ three bids were within I 5', of roch other ond only $4.000 scpm1cd 1he two lowcs1 bidi.
lkcaus, ofthi, u arrears 1h11 "ch Cro:ractor had a good Ulldmwid,ng oflhc scope of
.,or1: ond th" provided a good eompetiti~c result
The Gloscr Electric bid 01 SI06, 115 is the apparent low bid, This bid Is sign ificon lly higher
1hon our Engineer's cstimaic \IC prc~rcd in June of 2007 . To oddrcss this issue . .,,
requested od~u1on:ll lnfomuuon from Gloser Elcm,c and were pro, 1dcd with his de1allcd
11,1«-0ff and csumat: sbcclS. The following summ:mzcs our as.«essmcnt an J details 1hc
d11Tcrcncc between the engineer', csi1matc and GIJISCJ''s:
a. The overa ll cs1imo1c uppcnrs 10 include nil of 1hc work idemificd in 1he con1ruc1
documcnis.
b. M•Jor mo1cnnl pnccs ore within 10,o of the most recent materials costs"' ha,c
ob111ncd The5e current costs ore h1ghtr than our June 2007 estimate but in Gcrtmll,
they ore within 15 •, of th< pn:vious org1ncer's cstimotc.
c. A,ernge labor rnl•: is $35 .97. We a;sc ,rn.-d $35.00 ,n our engineer's cstimn1c.
d. To1ul lubor is 77·; man-hour11. Thal is s1gnifica11 1ly higher than we expected. This
would ri1u111e 10 > 4 mon crew for nearly 5 wc<ks on this project. That is nearly
1w1ee "hat we rxpcet<d
c The csumatc "" pngc 7 apparoo1ly roprcs,nlS work 10 the switchgear room totaltng
SI IJ49 >.«urning the alxl\'c •. ,. JC l"bvt mio. w, est1moted less thnn $3000 ,n
•his area.
f. The est imate on page 9 rcprcsw, rnobili1.111ion co.is which were not included in 1he
Eng,ncer's estimate This cs1imt\C·J cost at npproximu1ely J•, of the total bid "h1ch
lS an •ppropnt1tc wnoun1.
ll-The tsllmat< on page 10 rcprc>cnts fencing a,ound the transformer tOlaling
approximate!) S5200. We cstimnlcd SI 625 for this worl< based on R.S . Mcnns.
h. Approximn,oly S7000 is added "below the li ne" by hand on lhe froni page of1he
cstinulle which we hnvc no understnndin» of.
i. There an: se\'eml other sns11lcr d1ffere11,~ dun may snnply be differ•~•~ m
cst1matmg •pprooeh
\lien rr.111'-lom'l.cr Rcpl.lcc:n'lcnt \pnl •. ~"tl\ l',~c ~ In 1h< •~@rces••• 1he,c ,h1Tcm1ecs "PR=• ne:111)' S1".000. Our n~I r«enl adJu>lcd Engon«r's e;,111,a1<,. oppl'Oxmia1cl) S34.0.MI lt,s 1hon 1h1, hid In summ:it). lht 1hrtt rc.poosi,e bods pro-,dcd • compc11u, a em 1ronm<n1 w11h le,, 1h1n
SS,000 S<()llrollng 1h, "' o lowl'SI bids. Bttausc of •h1', -.e r,,commcnd oeccp1ing Gloscr"s
bid of 5106.115 if addni onal budge! can ht made ovoilable. If no1, -.e rceommcnd cn1er1ng
onlo nego11a1ion 10 idtn11fy clcmonlS of the work that can be omlllcd or reduced 111 cost 10
bnng the 1otal prujcc1 «•SIS down. Dunng this ncgotia1inn lhc discroponcic• on pricing no1<d
obo,•• could b< qucSlioncd and discussed.
Plca..c lc1 me know if you ho,·e any additional ques1ions or commcnis.
Very 1nlly yours.
Denn is W, McQu,ll on. P .E.
Munnging Engineer
•
•
•
.,_'\\.__ • ~'-l11ten,atfrma l Poll'er Syste ms, Ju e.
•
•
April •J. 10(lR Frank Gryglcwicz
Director ofFina11cc
City Of Englewood
1000 Engle-., ood Parkwa)
EnglC\\OOd. CO 80110
PROJECT : Transformer Rcp lacemcm l'rojt'CL # IF0-08-100
SUBJECT: Formal Protest 10 the Bid.
Dear Mr. Clarke:
"lnlcmalion"l Power Systems Inc." are wri1mg you to express ourdissa1isfac1ion 10 the recent
bid procedure for the abo,•e mentioned project . We have re-. iewL-d the hid documents again and ii clearly
stales "bids will be publicly opened and read out loud. Lale bids will not be accepted under any
circumstance" as stated in the 1h1rd paragraph of1hc IFB document that the city issuL-d.
We had o rcprescma1ivc present from our company for the opening and only two bids were read
aloud at 1ha1 time. Only two bids were read aloud publicly, 1ha1 cons1i1u1t'II the bidding. Any othl'l' bids
pl,'1' the "I FB" documents "ere considered late and not acceptable. We were informed lalcr, via plK>nC
cc,11vcrsa1ton. lhal there was indeed, another hid that was 11111 re;.td aloud publicly a 11d 1ha1 the thin!
1X-ntrac1or was the apparent low bidder. We therefore would like protest the bid as not following the
guidelines of the IFl3 e.1tablishcd by 1l1c cily.
We trust the c1t)•ol'Englcwood will do the nght !lung a:KI di<lallo\\ the bid m quc~1ion. We arc
cager 1<1 hear bacl fnim you rC£ardmg this mancr, and invite )'OU to et1n1nct us al your leisure pend ing
your m, cstigation. Thonk you for opportunity 10 bid with yc,u.
·i~u~
Robert D. Rciclcubuch
lntcmntional Pm,cr $)-stems. Inc.
rr~"'idcn1
1.! I.! \\t• .. 1 ( l 'llll r ,, l t\11<', 11,•m ,·r. t 11l,1r. ~I ll I '\ ~II.!.!:\ • ( llfi, n "'·' -ii h'IKM • I ,"1 \O.i -i :I 01}.l'\1I
ll'"il'll\\ I Iii/ 1J\~ t , 1.,•1 I • \\'\\'\\'.ll'\110\\ l',ll,,'I I