The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992 Ordinance No. 003ti !l a BY AlJ T II O HITY nlllJ l:S:A:'-T I·: :S.-O . ,d_ ,1-:1<11-:SO I·· In I l:'-12 CO L':S:f'II. BI i.i. :S.-O . 8 1 l:S:TR ODL:C W DY 'OC:S:C II . ~I D I IJ EH 11 ,\T II All'.\Y A:--' OHD l :S:.l :S:Cr: APPRO \'l:S:G T II E HEZO:--'l:S:G OF PRO PERT Y IJOU:S:D 1-:n 11\' EASD IAX A\'E:S:UE, OU T!! ACO ~IA, TllEET, FLOYD A\'E:'s'UE ,1:S:D SOU TH 1.1 :S:CO L:--' STREET FRO~! B-1, llt:S 11\'ESS TO ll -2, IJ US l:S:ESS . \\"II ERE AS, the nren h a s bee n zoned for commc rcin l or bmincss u~c since th<-C'n rlv I 950's: nn d · WII ER E:\S, th e B-2 Zone will al low di ffere nt co nditi ona l uses such ns ndull e nte rta in men t nncVo r se n •ice faci lity , nutom obile se rvice s tn l io n s , mo tor vc h ;clc re pai r, moto r vehicle lnundry or poli sh ing a nd a mu se ment cs tn bli shme nt s : nn d WH EREAS, th is rezoni n g will provid e th e need ed prot ectio n fo r the ndj acc nt resiclentin l nrcns wh ile enhan ci ng the bu sin ess zo ne in t he 3200 bloc k of So u th 13ron dwny; nnd WH EREAS. th e proposed rezoning will not finnn cinlly impn cl th e Ci ty inn negn t i\'e mnn ncr nnd mny spu r de,·e lopmen t or rede"clop men L of some of th e pnrcels in the nrcn to be rezoned : nnd \V lt ERE AS, th e Englewood Pl nn n ing nn d Zon ing Commission h el d n Public li en ring on >Jo \'emher 19, 199 1, re viewe d nnd reco mm ended the rezo ni ng of thi s p roperty to th e Ci ty Cou nc il ; :S:O W, THER EFORE , BE IT ORDA INED BY T HE CIT Y CO :S:CIL OF THE CI TY OF E:--'G LEW OO D, CO LORA DO , AS FO LLOWS: Sf.tl.io.oJ., The rezoning of th e prope rty desc ri be d be low fr om 8-1, Bu ine!-S lo fi-2, Ousin css is npp roved: Br~inning nt the cente r lin es of ou th Broad wn y nn d En tmnn .\venue, th E:n \\'eH nl ong th e centerline of Wes t En!itm :111 .-\ninuc to the ccnt e:rh nc of. ou th .\comn ~trcet: then , Ol!th nlon[? the crntC'rlil'(' cf ~n,1tJ , • n t C::trcct to ll:r cl'.!nt e 1 ne of \\'est Flo)\! .hE:nuC!: th~n E:i~t. :ilong th .;:, 1•~111 rlinc 01 \\'c•:--L Floyd A"enue to the ce nt erline of South Br o:,d,\ny: th en E,1.-:t .il ong th e cc·n terline of En st Floyd to the ce nte:1 .. ne of South 1 in cu ln Strcc·t: th en ~ort h r,long th e cen terlin e of Sou th Lincoln st'"CN to th ,.. t m crlin c of F::sl ~n!-tn1:111 .\, enue: th en \\"eH nlong th e cen te rlin e .l f Enst Ens-tmni .\':<'nue to th e cen terli ne of Sou th Br ondwny, the point of bc>~inninC! ~!!.!!1..2: IIE.\Rl~G .\ Puh J;c I i l';1rrni.: t"l ll thi-. l)nl111nllC'l' !1;1.: h1.•,·n -.('l frr ,fa1111.1n '.!tl, 1'.l.tl .it '7 H) P ,\1 min.mum If 10 dn~ ~ 11C1ltC't· P ubll,htd ns n Bill fo r ;m Ordinance on thr• 19th dn ~ of l k \l mhc·r, l ~l!l I .\ Puhlic l lC'nrmg \\ as he-l ei on ,J :-mun ry 20 th, 1992 . H(•nd hy lltlc :in d pn ~s<•d on finn l ren d ing on th e 20t h d ay uf ,Jnnuary, I 99"2. P uhli~h<'rl hy title ns Ordinance '.\'o . .2 , Series or 19!)1, on th<! 2J~d dny of J anuary, t !) 2 . . \TT EST : _½!'¼_&ct-__i_. _ _t /1-, ____ _ .oucri hi n :\. Elli s, Deputy ity Clerk I, Loutri shin A. Ellis, Dep uty City Cl erk of lh e City of Eng lewoo d, Co lorndo, hereby ce rtify that the nbo\'e nnd for egoi ng is n t rue copy or the Ordinance pnsse d on finn l reading nnd publis h ed by title ns Ordinance :-lo .1.._, Se ri es of 1992 . . 2 . IJY AU TI IO HITY O HDI NA:-O: :SO . __ SERIFS O F l!\lll c oui--:c 11 . 1111.1, NO . s 1 ISTHODUCED IJY OUNCIL ~1D tm:n 111\T HIIWIIY A IJ ILI. FOil AN ORDl:SA:S E APPIJ0\·1:,;G T II E HEZO:S l:S G OF PHO PERTY BOUK DE D BY EA ntA.'< AVE:S 'f:, :,0 TII ACO:-IA STREET, FLO YD ,\\'E:SL'F. A:SD SO UT II -+,IH 88 L.l ,Ii UUtHRO ~I ll -1, ll US l :SES TO ll-2, ll L'S l :S ES!". WHEREAS, th <! nrca hns bee n tonr :I fo r commc rrin l or bui::· .. , use sin ce the cnr \y 195 0'.: ond \\'HERE .-\S, the 0 -2 Zone will nl\ow different co nd itiona l use s suc h as adu lt cnt ertn inm enl nncVor sc r\'ic e fac ility . nut omobil e se r\'ice slations , mot or \'Chicle rcr,nir, motor \'Chicl e laundry or poli shing on d nm u~e ment cstu bl ishm ent ~; nnd WH ERE..\ 1 this rcion ing wi\\ pro,·ide the need ed protect1 on fo r th e ndjn cc nt rcsi dentinl nren s while enha ncing the bus in ess zo ne in th e 3200 bloc k of So uth Brondw:1y : nn cl WH EREAS , the proposed rezoning will not fmnn cia ll y imp ac t the City in n nei;nt l\'e ma nner and may spur de\'elo pmenl or rede\'elopment of some of t h e parcels in t he nren t o be rez.oned : and WHE REAS, the E ngl ewood Plan ning and Zoning Commission he ld a Public Hea ri ng on ~o,·e mbe r 19 , 199 1, revi ew,.d and reco mmend ed th e rezoning of this property to the City Council: NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COU KCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , CO LORADO . AS FO LLOWS: ~-Th e r eioning of the property descri bed b elow from [l. 1, ll usin ess to B-2, llusiness is eppro,·ed : ,. Beginning at the centerlines nf South Br oad way and Ea stman Avenu e, then West along th e centerlin e of We st Eastman A\'enue to the centerline of So uth /\coma Street: th en South along t he centerli ne of South Acomn St reet lo th e centerline of West Flr,yd A\'e nue: then Ea st alo ng the centerlin e of West Fl oyd A"enue U> the centcrHne of Somh Brondway; then E'lsl along t.hc ce nterlin e of East Floyd LO th e ccnte rhne of South Lincoln Street: then :,,.:orth along the centerline of South Linc oln street lo th e centerline of East Eas tman A\'enue : then \\'e st along the centerline of Ea st Eastma n A"enue to the cente rline of South Brondwny . the poin t of beginni ng. Sftl:'Ul.l, HE /\Rll\G: A Pub lic Hearing on this Ordinanc e has been set fo r January 20 , 1992 al 7:30 P .M. (minimum of 10 days notice). tt:mende ct,., Int roduced, rend in fu~d passed on fir sl reading on the 16th day of Dec e mber , 1991. Puhli s hed no, n Bill fo r nn Orrlin nncf:' nn tlH' 19th clnv or DecrmhC'r , 1!19 1 0~ i. , Ci ~ ~ _;. Clyde E. Wiggin s, ny or ATTEST : ~ Pntrrci n 11. Crow . C..:ity Cl erk I, P;,t ,icin It. row , City 'lerk or lhe Cit y or Engl ewoo d , Colorado, h ereby ce rtify th nt. th e -n , rn alt" ,L nbove a nd foregoing is a l ru e copy of n Bill fo r a n Ordinance, introduced , rea d in rull ,~ P""' d o , f, rst rending on th e 16th dny of Dere mbcr, 1991. - . 2 . ORDI NANC E NO ._ SERI ESOP rn9 1 A BILL FO R COUN CIL 811.1, NO. 81 INT RODUC ED BY COUNC IL ~!EMBER HATHAWAY AN ORD l1't\:S CE .APPR O\'JNG Tl-IE RE ZO :SJ:S G OF PROPER TY IJ OU:SDED BY EA BIA:-/ A\IE:S UC OU TH 1\CO~J,\ STREET. FLOYD A\'E:-1 1.:f: A:SD O TH Ll l'\CO L:S AVE:S 'E FR O~l ll -1, IJU Sl:SE SS TO B-2, IJUS l:S ES WH EREAS , th e a rea hn ~ bee n zo ned fo r com mercin l '>r bu sin ess use since th e ra rl y 195 0's: an d WHERE.-'\S, lhe B-2 7.one will all ow di fferen t co ndi t io na l uses s uch ns adu lt e nte rtain me nt F.nd/o r sen ·ic-e fnci lily , nu~o mobile ser\'icc st ations, mot or "ehi cle repai r, mot or veh icle l.1undry or poli shing and amusement esta bli shm e nt s: nnd WH E REAS , t hi s rezoning will pro\'i dc the needed protect io n for th e odjnccnt re~i dentinl areas whil e enhan ci ng t he bu sin ess zone in th e 3200 b loc k of "'outh Bron dwn y : nnd \l'HEREAS , the propose d rezoning wi ll not fin anc ia lly impart the Cit y in a negat i"e manner and may s pur de\'elop ment or redevelopment of some of the parcels in the a rea lo be rezoned : and WHEREAS , the Engl ewoo d Pl;nring and Zoning Commission held a Pu blic Hearing on November 19 , 199i., re\;ewed and r eco mm e nded the rezoning of thi s property lo Lhe City C ou ncil ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORD Al.'l tm BY THE CI TY COUJ\C IL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOO D, CO LORADO , AS FOLLOWS : SWi.an..1 . The rezon ing of the p ro peny described below fr om B-1. Bu sin ess to B-2 , Bu si nes s is 'J pproved : ,,_ Beginning at the centerlin e s of So uth Broadway and Eastma n A\'enue , then We st along the centerli ne of West Eastman Ave nue to the ce nterlin e of South Acoma Stree t : then South along the centerline of So uth Acoma Street to the ce nte rline of West Floyd Avenue : then East along the centerline of We st Fl oyd A\'enue lo the ce nterl ine of So uth Br oad,,·ay: then East al ong the cen terline of East Floyd lo the centerli ne of South Lincol n Street: the n ~orth along f .. centerline of South Lincoln street to t h e ceni€:r line of Ea st Ea stm a n A\·en u e; then West along the cente rlin e of E a st Eastman A•,cnu e t o t he cen ter li n e of South Broadway, the point of begin n ine . SftliJul..2 . HE AR l!\G: A Pu bli c Hearing on this Ordina nce ho s bee n se t fo r J nnu ory 20, 1992 et i :30 P.~I . (minimu m of JO days notic e). "->ne,,de d In trod uced, read in full, nd passed on firs t rea ding on the !Gth day of Derembe r , 199 1. ORDI NANCE NO ._ SEIUESOF 1991 BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR COUNCIL BILL NO. 81 INTRODUCt:D BY COUNC IL ~IF~IBER ______ _ AN ORDI NANCE APP ROVING TIIE REZ O!'I ING OF PROPERTY BOUND ED BY EAS TMAN AV ENUE, SO UTH ACOMA STREET, FLOYD AVE NU E AND SOUTH LI NCOLN AVENUE FROM B-1, BUS INESS TO 13 -2, BUS INESS . WHEREAS, the area has been zoned fo r co mmercial or business use s ince th e early 19 50',; nnd WHEREAS, the B-2 Zone will allow different conditional \. · -.It enterlainment and/or servic.e facility, automobile gp -·1• .ions, motor vehicle repair, moto r vehicle laundry or poli shing and amusement .. suolishmenls; and WHEREAS, this re,oning will provide the needed protecti on for the adjacent residential orens while enhanci ng the bu sines: ,one in the 3200 blo ck of South Broa dway ; and WHEREAS, Lhe propose d re,oning "ill not fin ancially impact the City in a negative manner and may spur dev elopment or rede ve lopment of some of the parcels in th e area lo be rezoned ; and WHEREAS , th e Engl ewood Planning and Zoning Commission held a Public Hea ring on November 19, 199 1, reviewe d and recommended the re•oning of this properly lo the City Counci l; NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS : Sw.iJm...l . Th e re,onin g cf the properly de s,ribed below fr om B-1, Busin ess lo B-2, Business is a pprov ed : Beginning at th e intersection of th e Ce nterlines of $91ffh8ro adway and Ea stm an Aven ue ; then \ · ea"s tmen Av enue to the Centerline of South Ac oma S line of South Atom n Street a distance of4 82 .5 feet, m line of South Broadway, then Sou th along th e Cen en terline of Floyd Avenu e; th en East along th e Cen t enterline of South Bro od woy - Sou th Lincoln te rl ine of the South Broadway• Sou th Lin co ln. Rstman Avenue : the n \Ve st Cent erline of Sou th Br .. i1C,YRY ~-IIEARl:-.G : ,\ Public ll eo rin g on this Ordinance hos been set fo r Jon uary 20, 19 92 nt ; 30 P ~I I minimum cf 10 dnys notice). lntrod11 ·eri, r('nd m full. :m cl pns"c d cm ri rct rending on th e 16th day of Dccemhe r, 1991 Published as a Bill fo r on Ordinance on the 19th doy of Dece mber, 1991. Clyde E. Wiggin s, Mayor ATTES T : Patricia H . Crow , City Clerk I, Patric:• H. Crow, City Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado, h ereby certify th at the above and forego ing is a true copy of a Bill ror an Ordinance, introduced , read in full, and passed on first r eading on the 16th day of December, 1991. Patricia H. Crow . 2 · Date December 16, 1991 INlnATED BY COUNCU. COMMUNICATION Agenda Item 11 e Crnn mun1ty Development Subject Rezorung Ordinance STAFF SOURCE Richard S . Wanush, Director of Community De ,.rclo pment l88UE/AC110N _PROPOSED Counctl la requested to Introduce an Ordinance for the rez.ontng of a portion of the A area bounded by Eastman Avenue, South Acoma Street,. F1oyd Avenue, and South -Lincoln Avenue fro m B-1 , fJuslne. to B-2, Business, and to set January 20, 1992 as the Public Heari ng, (1. ,~-: <, r this matter. PREVIOUS COUNCD, AC'l10N There has been no previous Council action on this matter. STAFF ANALYSIS TIils rezoning request came b efore the Planntng Commlsslon at the request of the Department of Community Development whlch had received mqulre regarding zoning and land use In the 3200 block of South Broadway. After further discussions at the staff level, a request for a Publlc Hearing for rezoning was presented to the Planning CommJsslon. The Planning Commlsslon scheduled the Public Hearing for . ovember 19, 1991. Prior to the Public Hearlr.g, staff Invit ed all businesses and property owners In the affected area to an lnfomiational meeting to dlscuss the pro posed re zoning and Its Im pact. Staff also presented the proposed r ezoning to the EDDA and the Chamber Gove rnmental Affairs Committee. As a r esult of these meetings, the boundaries of the proposed r ezoning were modifi ed. The new boundary ls described as follows : BeglDn1ng at the Centerlines of South Broadway and Eastman Avenue : then west along the centerline of West Eastman Avenue to the ccnterllne of South Acoma Street; then south along the centerline of South Acoma Street a d!~tance of 452 .43 feet, more or less: then east to the centerline of South Broadway; then south along the centerline of South Broa dway to the centerline of Floyd Avenue : the east along the centerline of East Floyd Avenue to the centerline of the South Broadway • South Lincoln Street Alley; then north along the centerline of the South Broadway• South :.. 'ncoln Street Alley to the centerline of East Eastman Avenu e : then west along the centerline of East Eastman Avenue to the centerline of South Broadway. nus revised area provides the needed v rotectton for the adja cent resldtmtial &Teas while enhancing the business zone In tlrn 3200 block of Soutl, Bro adway. BACKGROUND The area proposed for rezoning has been z .. ned f11 r commerL,;l or business use sin.cc the early 1950's. The propos~d c hange from B-1 to 8 -2 does uot represent a slgllfflcant change In. zoning f..,, t.he area. The 8-2 zone district allows all the uses of the B-1 as well as 14 addltio;,•11 uses. The major difference IS In the conditional uacaa allowed In the 8-2. w, These conditional uses are: adult entertainment and/or service faclllty, automobile service stations, Motor vehicle repair, motor vehicle laundry or polishing, and amusement establishments. Of these, amusement establishments ts the only conditional use pennJtted In the 8-1. The auto-related conditional uses generated the most debate In terms of Its appropriateness near the ce ntral business dlstrlct. This debate was tempered by the fact that the Planning Commission does have more control over condltlonal uses than p emu,ted uses . FINANCIAL Approval of the proposed rezoning will not ·tlnanctally Impact the City In a negative manner. There ts some potential that the rezoning may spur development or redevelopment of some of the parcels In the area to b e rezoned . If property that ts c urrently vacant ls thus d evelop ed . additional r evenue co uld b e ge n erated for the City. HMF REPORT CAU NO . 8-9 1 STAl'I' REPORT RE: PURLrC HEARINO RZZONINO The rezon ing of o portio n of the Cent ral Buaineaa District bounded by Ea ■tman .\venu e, Acoma Stre e t, Floyd Av enu e a nd Li n co ln Str eet, fr o m B-1 , Bueinaaa, to B-2, Bua i ne ae . DATE TO BE CONSIDERED : November 19 , 1991 PllOCEDUU : The Pl anning Comm i asion ia requi r ed to hold a Public Hearing on t he propo ■ad rez.on ing. The rec omme ndation of the Pla nning Commia a i on to approve, or deny, the rez.oning must be forwarded to Ci ty counc il. City Cou n c il will hold a Public Hear i ng o n the pro posed rezoning prior t o rendering a f i nal daciaion . In deter mil"',ing t.ha appropriateness o f a proposed z.one c hange, the Planning Corm1i11aion MHt f i ne!: 1 . Th at the proposed rezoning promotes the hea lth, safety, or wel fare ot the i nhabitant ■ of the City o f Englewood and the purpoae of th i s 0rrlinance; and 2. That the pro po ■ed rez.o nia.1 iB c onsistent with the Comprehens i ve Plan, and J . That there has been a mate.dal change in the c haracter of the neighborhood o r in the Ci t y genera lly , such that the p r oposed rez.oning wou ld be 1n the public int'1 r ee t a nd c o n sistent. wi th the change ; o r 4. That the p1· ~e r ty to be r e z.o nc d was p r eviou s ly z.o ne d i n erro r; or 5 . That the pro perty c a n no t be <.lev e lop ed under the exist ing 2.on ing ; o r 6. Su c h ot h e r cone! r ions as are ex p ress ly permitted by l a w. DESCRIPTION OF T HE SUBJECT SITE , The area o f t.t-r:. p,:op,,sed re z oni ng include s t he )200 Block o f So uth Broadway and ex tend s on tl.t.• eat5t t o Sou th Linco ln St r e et and on the we st to So uth acom a Streat . Th i s area is now zone d B-1 1 Bu s iness District, the Ce ntral Business District z.one des i g nation . It is com posed of a mi x o f convnercia l and offic e use s . There at'e also f our nonconfot"minc; uses 1n the 3200 block o f South Broadway; t wo used ca,c dealers and t.,.·o auto serv1ce st.ati o ns. RELATIONSHIP TO TH E CO MPREHENSIVE PLAN : The subJect. area lS d esignated as part o( the Ce n tral Bus1ness Dis trict. -I - STAPP REPORT CASE NO, 9-91 DEPARTMENT or COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AHALYSJS 1 Pl/llLIC HIUIINO REIONINO The lmpetua f or the proposed z.ono change came after staff diacuaaio n ■ on the nature, conditio n, and extent o f the downtown area and various land u ■a and zoning inqulriea fr om p r o perty owr-oro in t he area . To determine the approprl- atenaaa of the proposed zo ne change there are several i aauea that must be a d- dreaaed . These issues are: What defines t h e downtov , or Central Bualneaa Di11trict? Have there been cru, ,qel! ln the :,&l ura CL' character of the downtown and adjacent B-2 areft that aubata ntiato the proposed rona r-h1.1 nga1 !! thi• re:,:,. la? !,. n prov-ad, wh t impact ■ will it have o n t he downtown area and adjar• ,.: t 1t .:i dential area? Theaa iaauea can her.it he addres sed by first reviewing the six finding• me n- tioned above. 1. That the proposed rezoning promotes the health, safet y, or welfare of the i nhabita nt ■ of the City of Englewood and the purpose -,f thia Ordinance. The change from 8-1 to 8-2 does not change the general nature of the area , - that ia commercial. The B-1 zone District specif i cally permits ninety -four u ■as as wall aa one Conditional Use. These uaaa for the moat part are intend- ed to promote an u :-ban cha racter through the ir mixed use n ature . The B-2 Zone Diatrict , while allowing 11 uses al lowed in t he B-1 Zone , also permi t ■ four- teen additional uses aa well as five Co nditional Uses. These additiona l uae ■ are more oriented toward s vehicular traffic than pedestrian traffic aa in the B-1 Distr let . Clearly, the proposed rezo n i ng will not generate the t ype of change in use that might occur i f the proposed rez.oning were to ind u strial or s i ngle-fami ly res identi al . 2. Th at the pro posed rezoning i '" .:onsiste nt. with the Com pL·ehensive Plan: The ComprchensLve Plan i dentif ies this area as the Central Business District. The Com prehensive Pla n states: Generally, it (the downtown a rea/ is b ounded on the no rth by Floyd ~venue and by Eastman Avenue. To the no rth of these street s, there well es- t abli shed residential areas ;.Jh i c h shou ld be protected fr om comm ercial en- croachment. White some a ccess must be provLded from Dartmou t h Ave nue to the downto\.J n , F loyd Avenue and Eastman Avenue should be stre ngthened as b arr iers to any f ur-ther expansio n o f the business z.o ni.ng to the north. These t\.JO streets should be a permanent buffe1: between down t ow n ac t i vi t y and the res ident.Lal environment. -2 - ,urr REPOR PUBL I C BEARING CAIi riO, 8•_:I..!_ -----------------------~IIE=ZO""N"'l"N'-"O lta abov o po int• are al so re iterated in the "Policies for En glewood Downtown L.twlt lop•ent " aection o f the Comp reheneive Plan ado pted by the Planning Corrvnia- 1ion i n 1981. Clea r l y, thie area haa been viewed iU a part of tho downtown a··.._,-'· J . That ther a haa b een a material c hange i n the c haracter o f the neighborhood or in the City Cj1&nerally, such that the pro posed re1o n ing would be in the p ub lic intare ■t and consistent wi th the change. There h as not been any aubata ntial chang1:1 in the cha-:a ctar or mix of u ■e• in thia area over the l aat ten years, Historical ly, the auto related nonconform- inq uaea have changed own ersh i p much more frequently than t he permitted u ■e ■ !n t he a r ea . Thia ar&a ha ■ exhibited more ■tabi l ity relative to the downtow n .,. a whole . Saeed on the Comprehen ■iva Plan, if changeo in thi11 area take pl11 1,:.e , they should be to uae ■ that are more downtown oriented than lea ■ down- tow" oriented . 4 . That the property to be rezo ned wa s previously zoned in error . Th 1, h-1 zoning ot thi1 area haa bean in pl a .;,e since 1963, and was baaed o n similar zoning in place for many y ears prior . Therefore, there l a no evidence t h at the zoning was placed on this area in e rror. s. That the property c annot t--e developed under the exist i ng zoning . Thia ia perhaps the mo at problematical findi ng to make. It ia important that the Pl11nn ing Commia ■ion differe nt i ate between tho inability o f a property or area to be developed or redev e loped because of condit i ons i mposed by zoning o r the zon ing itoelf, and the ina bilit y o f a p roperty or area t o develop becauae o f market o r real estate condit ions . If the latter b ecom es ct legitimate r ea- son to rezone prope rty , zoning tecome a simply ~ne ther marketing t oo l for real estate devel opment and spec ul at ion rathe r than a proces s by which long t8rm development can be guided and controlled. 6. Su ch other cond1tion a as are expressly permitted by law . Cu rrently , there are no o cher conditions expressly authorized by Ordi na n ce upon which a rezoning may be grantE.d. The downtown area has, f or many years, been defined as beginning at East.man Avenue. This i s reflected 1n bo th the City's comprehen"Jive planning and zoning efforts. In fact, i t u reasnnable to assume that these ef f o r t s were based more on the desire to preserve the existing n at u re and charact er of the area rather han force a c ha nge to downtown type area throug h zo ning and land use planning. This 10 further supper ed by the Dc"':-:tc· ... n Redevelop:re n t efiorta which, whi le f ocusing fnmar1ly on the )JOO and 34C0 blocks of the downtown, nevertheless included th i s area. The Comprehens1..ve Plan, 1n particular, rccogn1:crl that whlle t h e area 1n q11estion does not share all the att.r1..b utes of, !o r 1 ns ta rce, the 3400 block of -3 - STAPP REPORT CASE NO , 8-91 PUBLIC IEAJllNO UZONl NO South Broadway, i.t La more des irable that, over t im e, the development or re - development o! the 3200 Bl ock o f South Bro adway and adjacent areaa be a c o n - t i nuation of the dow n town and not the strip convnercilll that cha racterizes South Broadway farthe r north. In terms o f changes in tho nature or character of thi.a area, it La clear that there hava been l i. t t le Lf any c:~ :t n"!e. Beyond the publ!.c lmprovem&nt a of atreatacapi.ng carried out t hrough ne d .:,wntow n redevolopm ent effort ■, little or no change as a result of private development activity haa taken i;,Lt.ce, un- 1 Lke the reat of t he downtown a rea. The salient question to then ask is: .. ts the lack of new devol opment or re- development o f thia area somehow a result of the z.oning?" The an&wAr i:o th ia queation La a qualifl-:d "No". Qualif ied in the sense th-'\t in thi• area there ara many other factors boeidea z oni ng that influence the decision of ft p roper- ty owner to develop C'l r ..-e develop a i:,roperty. The question then bec °'1,J -:t1 "To what degree Coea z.on i ng affect the potential for redevelopr:1ent?" Th .. answer to this question, while difficult to answer, must be framed in t u rma c.•~ indi- vidual propert ies rather than the area aa a whole. Howe·.iar, it a ~ould be clear from the findings above that the change from B-1 to B-2 will n ot ■ub stantially encourage or discourage deve lopment or redevelopment. RECOMMENDATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COwruNITY OEVELOPMENT1 The bas is for the following recomme nt rttion is the need to protect adjacent ,A residential areas fr om any negative L •~ .let.a that may result from the propoaed • z.onlng, whlle affording the area itself the positive impact that may ba gener- ated by the ;-roposed re z.on ing. Thus, the reconvnendation ia to approve the proposed rez.oning with the foll owing revision to the area to be rez.oned. Beginning at the cente r lines of South Broadway and Eastman Avenue; then west along the centerline o f west Eastman Avenue to the centerline ot South Ac oma St reet; t-.hen south along the centerline of South Ac oma Street a distance of 452.4 J. feet, mo re o r ese; then east to the centerline o f South Broadway; then south along the center l ine of South Broadway to the cent erline of Floyd Avenu e , then east al ong t 'le centerline o f East Floyd Avenue to the centerline of the Sou th 3roadw~•r/South Lincoln St :.-~n.t Alley; then north al ong the center- line of the Sout h .,roadway/South Li .,1) ·1 Street alley to the centerline of Ea st Eas tman Ave n ue; then west a long t l1e ~enterl i ne o f East Eastman Av enue to the cP.nterl ine o f Sou th Broadway. - 1 . The parking area mua t be ■cr••n•d from the reaidential portion of th ■ lot by a •h foot opaqu fence. Slde yard fence ■ mu ■t al10 be pro- vided to ■cre en a dj1cent property . Th••• fence• •h all aleo bo e h feet in height except that within t e n teat ot the rear property line, the fen c e ■ cannot exceed 4 2 inch e ■ Ln holght, and mu ■t b e of ch ain 1 in k or SO\ o pe n const ruction. 2. J. 4 . s . 6 . J. 8. s . The p a rking area mu ■t be of a h ard aur!ace to preven t t he mo vement of dirt and debria f r om the parki ng area onto the public right-of -way , Pa rking e t o pa mu ■t be pla ced Ln the p.t.rklng a rea to prevent dam.t.;e to the fe nce by v ehicles . Provi e iona e1 uat. be made for the collection of tra ■h •• per City Ordinance. The f inal deeign of the park i ng area muat be 11ppro ved by the Director of Cotm1 un i ty Development or t h e appro pri at e deslgnee . No a tor age of v eh ic le ■ Le permitted and the l ot Le to be u ■ed ■ole l y for the parking o f employ£ JB or cuatome ;-1. No vehic le• in ex c e aa of 7,000 pounds ma y be parked in the parking uea . The minimum width of the parki ng area a hall be SO fe et. The Director o f COtM1 unit y De v elopment may d e ny the u1e of any lot •• a pa rking area i f the a b ove p r ovi a ion a are not met . Ac c epted ■afety a t andards are to be uaed in c o n sidering the appro\'a l or denial of any propo ■ed p ark i ng p lan. The Di.rector '• rul i ng may be ap;,ualed to th• Board of 1'd j uatment and 1'ppeala . Tbe Pla nning eo-i ■1i oo al 10 reco-■od1 that th• Englewood Municipal Co de (Co•p r eb ■n1iv• Zoning Ord i n ance) be furth er aaend ed •• follow ■: Amend Section 16.4 -9C of the EHC by c h•nging S l 6 .4-9C(2) t o S l6.4-9C (l) and adding a ne w S 16.4-9 (2) as fol l ows : (21 Privat e of f-street parking lots ................... 1 2 ,000 square feet AY ES : Dummer , Ger lick, G~ynn, Schu ltz., Shoop, Tobin, Da vle t , Dr a per il AYS : t-lone J,_J:SENT: Coven a AB STAHi : Hone Th 1: mot ion ca rr l ed. IV , PUB LIC BEARING CASE #8 -91 B-1 t o 8-2 Chairman chu tz asked for a mo 10n o open the Publi c .taring. Gerl i.ck rrioved: Dra per a econde~: The Pub 1c He sr 1ng on Case 1 8-91 be opened . -6 - Garl ick , Olynn, Sc hult z, Shoop, Tobin, Dav i et, Dra,er, Dunner Non• ABSENT I Coven ■ ABSTAIN I No ne Th• motion ca r ried . Chaic-man Schult z a ■k od that the ■taff pc-•••nt the i ■■ue before the Cor!W',1i1uion . Hr. Ha ro ld Stitt, duly ■worn 1n t h ■ p ravi o u a Publ ic Hea r ing , pre ■ented proof o f pub licat ion a nd certif i cation o f po ■ti ng f o r t he Public Hearing. Mr. Stitt ■tated tha t the rer.o n lng from B-1 , Bu ■ine ■■ to e -:z , Bu1ine11, encom- pa11e11 an a r ea bound ed by Ea s tman Avenue on the north , Acoma Street on the we ■t, Fl o yd Avenue o n the aout h, and Lincol n Street o n the ea ■t. Hr. Stitt de ■cribed the ■u b jec t area, and pointed o u t t hat the 3200 block of south Broadway ha a f ou r non-confo rm ing uae ■: two ser vice ■tatione, and two u ■e•l ca <~ dealerahip ■. The rema i n i ng deve l opment i ll a mix of corr .. -n.rcial and office u ■e . staff ha ■ rece i ved ■everal i nqu i r i a ■ from pera on ■ wanting to explore the po ■- ■ibil i ty of add i t i ona l automotive-related uae ■ in the 3200 block on South Broadway, wh i ch u ■aa are not per mitted i n the B-1 Bu1ine11 Diatrict. The i ■- ■ue wa ■ al ■o di ■cu ■■ed witn t he Governme nt al Affaire Convnittee of the Greater Inglewood Chamber of Conwnerce, which conwnitt .. ,e i ■ i n favor of the re&onin9, and recomm11nded that the rezoning extend from South Acoma on th• w ■t to s o uth Lincoln Street on the aa ■t . Kr. Stitt empha ■ized that in determi n ing t he appr o pr i atenaa ■ of a propo ■lld 1one change, the Planning Corrmi ■■ion muat f i nd : l. That the pro poaed rezon i ng promote ■ the health, safety, or wel :·are o f the inhab l tante of t he Ci ty of En g lewood and the purpo ■• of thi ■ Ordinance, and 2. That the propo ■ed rer.oning i ■ co na i.■tent with the COfflprehenalve Plan, and 3 . That there has been a ma t e ria l c hange i n the charac ter o f the neighborhood or in t he City g e ne rally , au c h that the pro posed r e zoning would be in the public interest a nd con a iatent with t he c hange; or 4 . That t he prope rty to be r e r.on e d '"'as previoua ly zone d in arror ; or 5 . Th a t the pro perty c a nnot be developed u nder the e x i st inc; r.oning ; or 6 . Such other conditions as are e r.pressly perm itted by law. Hr . !"c.itt atated that sta ff has d i a c.1..ased the nature , conc'-i tion and extent of the o.:>wntow n area f or a number of m-:,nths, a nd the queet ion ot "where doaa d owntown begin " has arise n many times . The Comprehe ns ive Plan and the Down- town Devel opment Pl a n have identified "dow ntown " as beg inn ing a t the 3200 block o f Sou t h Br o adwa y. I seu&a; which the Convniasion mua t alao cons i der i n d ete rmin ing t he appropr iateness o f the rezoning a r e : 1. What def inee t he downtown or Central Bus i ness Dist rict ? 2. Ha ve there been change a i n the na ure o r cha r acter o f t he downtown and A ad jacent B-2 ar ea that substantiate the propo s ed zone c hange ? W' -7 - 3 . If th.le rar.oning i• a pprovad , what impac t ■ wi l l i t hava on th ■ downtown ar ■a and adjac■nt r 11 i d1ntial area? Kr . Stit t di ■played an a ■ri.a l photograph of the ■ub j ■ct area, on which photo- g r aph wa ■ outl i ned the or igi nal proposal to razon• o nly the 3200 block of South Broadway , th ■ axpandad araa aa ad varti ■ad and r•conn■nded by th■ Ch&mbar of ConwNr c ■, a nd an overl ay depicting th"'J araa ■taH r ■cOfl'lne nd• be rezoned, which begin ■ a t the center line s of So uth Broadway and Ea1tman Avenue ; t hen wa ■t a long the centerline o f Wea Eastma n Avenue to the cente rline of So l•th Acoma Street; than a o uth along the cente rline o f Sout h Acoma Streat a di 1tanc1 o f 452 .43 f ea t, more o r 11111 than aaa t to the c enterline of South Broadway, than ■outh along the center:U na of South Broadwa y to t he centerl ine of Floyd Av1 nuo , then eaa t al ong t he cent e rl i ne of Eaat Floyd Ave nue to th ■ centerline of th ■ So 1.1 th Br o adway/Sout h Lincol n St reat Alley, then north along th■ c1ntar- lin1 of the Sout h Broadway/South Lincoln Straat alley to th., r.■ntarlin• of laet Ea ■tma n Avenue, then waet a l ong the centerl ine of E a ■t Ea ■tman Avanu ■ to th ■ cant ■rl i n• of South Broadway . Hr . Stitt d i.ec u ■aed an in formal meeting ■taff had held with pro perty owner ■ in t h• ■u bject area of November ?. Hr . Stitt sta ted that qu i te a few of the at- tendee ■ we re not i n fav:>r of a c hange o f zoning, particularl y along South Lin- coln St reet . A• a r dau l t of this me eting, ataf f reviewed the initial area which wae advert i ■erl for r a&onl ng, and propoae ■ the reduc tion in area a ■ pr•- viou ■ly outlined . Mr . Stitt atated t hat t he reduction in ar•• recommended by ■taff i ■ a r ■cog niz e d need to pro c ■ct the adjacen . re ■idantla l area on South Lincoln Street from any negat ive impact of the propoeed rez.oning, but will alee afford th■ 1ubjact b l o ck it ■elf addit i o nal poaeibilltiea for redevelopnent . Hr . Stitt al ■o pointed out t hat. th i ■ will ■till prov ide a buf fe r of 8 -1 along Sout h Lin- coln ■eparat i ng the h i gher i nten ■l t y 8-2 from the reeldential dl11t rict ■a ■t ot South L . ncoln St r eet . The eaat alde of South Acoma Streat i n the 3200 block i ■ pre ■a nt l y developed with buaineea ueea, and the 8 -2 zonlng will not i mpact that area adverse l y. Mr. St itt f urther ex pl ai ned t hat i t i a pe rmia oible to z.one in whole or l n part any area wh ich i s advertised f o r r ez.oning ; lt i s not permi ■■i b l a to expand z.onlng to encompaaa an area which ha ■ not been adverti ■ed fo r rez.oning. Therefo re, t he reduction in a rea reconvnended by ata ff le allowabh unda r zon ing law. Hr. Stitt d iscu11aed usee permitted i n t he B-1 and B-2 Districta, noti ng that there are an addit ion 14 uaee pe r mitted in the B-cl ass i fication . B-2 al ■o all ows cond i tional uses which must be appr ov ed by the Planning Coi.vnieaion; t heee condltional uses are automobile o r adul t bu11ineaa o riented. Hr. Stit t re iter ated that t he 1raJority of inqu1r.1es regardi ng properties in the 3200 bloc k of South Broa dwa y have been auto related which a re not pe rm itted in t he B-1 Di s trict even a s a cond i ti onal use. Hr. Stitt emphaelz.ed that tha Corrrnleeion must conside r the i mpact rezon ing wi ll ha ve on exi s t ing land uee. Th e :toning on Bro adway re f h ,cta the continua- tion of hlator 1c uae . Hr. St itt pointed out that the activity t hat might oc - cur ae a result of rezoning will be a redevelopment of marginal prope rties , or i n-fill of the few vacant parcels. Hr. Stitt emphae iz.ad that the market is the determ i.nlng fa c or on development/redevelopment, and that rezoni ng should -8 - not be con ■lder ed • qulck-tlx f o r ■omeone t rying to •ell , d evelop, or r e - develo p hll property . Hr . Stitt ■tat ed t hat thl• block ha• been ve ry •,table" 1 and whil e owner1hlp• may have changed, the character of uee ha ■ not . - Hr, Stitt atated that ■h ort-t erm go al ■ may be nece ■■ary in term ■ o! economic dev ■lOP"'■nt , but not i n long-term planni ng . Hr , Stitt 1tated tha t 1tatt doe ■ recorMMt nd r ■r.o nln g the mo dified area a ■ r ■cOCffll ■nded in the 1ta t t repo r t, and a ■ out l ined on the ·,e r. Lal photograph die- played earlier . HI . Dav l et aaked about the former Co vert Aut o-body pro perty . Hr. St i tt 1tated that it i ■ B-1 , and •Ji ll rema i n 10 unde r the ■taft r ■c Oftllenda t ion . Hr , Shoop inquire1J about breaking zon i ng li ne ■ on alley ■ v1 . raid-block and middle of the '-lreet . Hr . St i tt add rea e e d the mid -b l ock rer.oninlll reconnended on South ~coma Street, pointi ng out that the north end of the block of South AcOffla Street le developed t or bu1 i ne1 1 purpo ■e ■, and the ■outh end i ■ u ■ed by U, s . Weet Communicati on ■. The B-2 Zone Diatrict wo u ld make the u ■e ■ on the north end o f the block u1 ■1-by-ri9ht rather than non-cont onnino . Krl, Tobin inqu ired a.bout the po11 lbility o f an adult bu ■i ne•• u ■e in c:lo ■e proximity to re ■ident l a l u ■ee . Hr . St itt cited the 500 foot rule on location of adult bue i ne ■■e• in proximi ty to ■ch oo l ■, re ■identi ■l area ■, ■to. He cited one ■mall area where a n adult buein••• mi ght be able to locate and -■t the 500 foot rule r ■■tr ict, but th• area l a 10 ■mal l that it would be practically impo ■■ible to u ■e . It th• ■taff recOft'fflendation l • followed, however, no pa.rt at the recOffWended area would permi t adult bu ■in•••••· Hr, Schultz a ■ked it anyo ne w i ■h ing to addre ■a the C omml ■■lon wa ■ repre ■ented A by coun ■el. Rearing no re ■pon ■e r egard i ng leg al co u n ■el , Mr. Schult• atated - that the Commiaa ion would hear from i ndlvlduala wl ■hing to addre ■■ the Conni ■■ion . Michael Cullifer, 322S -29 South Lincoln Street , was ■worn in. Kr. Cull.f.fer atated that he underatcod the rezoning was to include the we ■t ■id e of South Lincoln Street, but ■ta ft i • not r11cotM1endi ng i t do eo. Hr . Stitt stated that thi ■ is c orrect. Kr . Cull i fer testified that he operatea an auto repair g arage at 3229-1/2 s outh Lincoln, which apec i al i z.ea in the repair of Br i t i sh impo r t ■• Mr . Cul- lifer te1tif led that a had operated hie buai ne a ■ for aeveral year ■ under • variance granted by t he Bo ard of Ad juatment, wh ich var iance wa1 revoked thia year . The reduct ion in the rezon i ng area will me an that his bu ■in ••• cannot continue and will no t become lega l at the present location . Mr . Cullifer aaked why the entire bloc k could not be zoned B-2. He po i nted out that there i ■ v acant land on the a ou th end of the b lock , and how would thla be Cl ■veloped if the zoning were R-3 o r B-1. He wanted h i.a a hop a t 3229-1 /2 to be i ncluded in the 8-2 z.one d istr 1ct. Hr . Sch ultz. aa ked if there we re add 1.tional proponent ■ wh o wiahed t o ad d r e ■1 the Conwn l aa ion. No one add l ional ■poke i.n favor of the rezoning . Hr . Schultz then asked that opponen s p resent the i r argument ~ -9 - larl Ladewig, 3235 South Lincoln , wae eworn in. Hr, Ladewig ■tated that he did not feel tht1re had been change• in the ar ■a which would ju1tlfy th ■ r ■aon i ng. The fact there a r e four n on-conforming u ■■• operating in the 3200 block South Broadway la fine with t h ■ r ■■idant1 l iving on South Lincoln Str ■■t1 th ■y know what the bu1i neeae1 ar ■ and wh~t to expect from them . If th ■ rezoning to 8-2 were Lo be approved there could ba an additional 14 ue ■■ which might be d:tv ■loped and c ould im pact the reaident i al q ua l ity of thei r neighborhood. Mr . Ladew ig 1tat ■d that Hr . Cull ifer had a good b u1inea1 and that i n h i ■ opinion 1.t: wa ■ not right that the var ianca wa a ,. ·e ked . Hr. Ladewig emphae lz ■d that Mr . Cu llifer ■h o u l d have the right t o contin ... e hie bueineaa. Ha, Davi.at inqu i red what rea1ona we re g i ven for revocation o f the variance. Mr , Cullifer atatad that i t pertained to the number of v eh icle ■ h ■ waa worki ng o n and h ad parked e n the property. Ml. Oaviat a ■ked i f Hr . Cullifer '■ property could be included in the rezoning. Hr , St i tt ata ted 1.hat thil would be "■pot %oning ", and ■pot zoni ng i • not an accepted practic e . 11 ■• Dav let a ■ked h ow l ong Hr. Cull ifar had been in bu s ineaa . ha r e ■ponde d he h•~ bean in bua i neaa for seven to e ig ht year a. Kr , t..ad ~""i q at ted that t he parking of the vehicles Hr. Cullifer wa ■ working on wa ■ not botheraome to the ad j o ining property owners. Mr. Schu l tz. poin ted out tha.t varia.ncea a :,t granted and revoked by the Board of Adju ■t Hn t and Appeall, not by the Plano •9 Convni ■eion. Kr. Shoop a ■ked if Hr. Cullifer could u,;erate hie buaineaa if t he Coan i ■■ion we re t o approve the reduction in area recommended b y staff. Hr . Stitt •~•t•:I tha t auto repair ia not an approved u ■e in B-1 . Nr . Frank Reemee, 3201 South Linco ln street, wa ■ ■worn in. Hr. ~"'ctme ■ ■tated t hat he haa lived at thia addreaa for 28 yaare . Hr, Reemaa s e ated that he felt ■ith ■r t he entire block should be re%oned, or none of the block aho4!~ ba re%onad, but don • t %Ona only one property. Hr. Raemoa atatod that ha la con- cerned with the health and welfare n f t he people living i,., the area. The Br oadway/Lincoln allay i ■ very heavU.y t raveled, and ve \~i c l.aa are "teat driven " in t he alley , with the speed lim1 , being exceeded the majority of the time . Mr, Reeme ■ testified that o n occasion the motorist racing down the al- ley doesn 't even eto p before crossing the street t o proceed down the a.l ley i n the block north. Hr . Re em ee ■tat.ad th at the Conoco station at Broadw•y and Floyd has a r a ce c ar thai i s "revved u p" and c an b e heard f o r three or four blocks around. He stated that 1.t. le bad enough when the race car i a "wou nd u p " at the south end of the block, and he doeen' want it any closer. Sco tt Re y n olds, 3244 Soulh L1.ncolr,, was sworn 1n. Hr . Reynolds comme nded t he corrnisaion for "par1.ng down" the proposed rezo n1.ng. He is concerned about the projected uae of the former Covert ptoperty. Hr. Reynolds alao inquired about the mi n im um area that would be requi.red for an adult busine ss. Mr . Wa nuah sta ted t! ·t any adult bu a1.ness would h a ve to provide oft-street park ing, lan:.iscap1.ng, etc. in ad~1.\1.on t o the structure. The on ly aita t hat might be a va tab le by vi r tue of the 500 foot llmitat.i.on ie i naufflcie nt in 111.te to me t t tncae m1.n 1m um requ 1.remente. -10 - Kr . Reynold ■ al ■o 1upport1d Hr , CUlllf ■r •• bu1in111 operation, and e tat ■d that if the Board of Adju ■tment •i11r1 to hold a nother hear ing, a number of th ■ r11i- d1nt1 of th ■ area would ■upport granting a variance . H.r . Reynold ■ empha ■i&ed - t hat Cullifer •• operation wae not 1.11 noi ■y aa the Conoco operat ion. Kr. Reynold ■ do■■ not wa nt the rezoning to extend to South Lincoln Str-t . Shelly B e dor ■, 3 298 South Broadway , ■tated that ■he i ■ co-owner of the Conoco S~r"ice ■ta tion. Ha. Bedore ■tatei that their bu ■ine•■ t ■ non-conforming, and th•y c a nnot e x pand1 200 ,000 veh ic le• are proc••••d through their ■tation every month. Th ■ r a c e car 111 there only t hree month ■ out of the year , ■nd that their mechani c ■ do not teat drive vehicle ■ up and down the alley . Ha. Sedor ■ ■tated that the rezoning to 8-2 would be benefic ial to t he bu1ine1111 on Broadway . Ha . Bedore s tated thal th ■ owner ■ of t he ■tat ion ca.re about t he City and th• n•i ghborhood, and hav• tried to upgrade t he ■tation and keep i t c l ean . Their bu ■i nesa ia growing, and th ■y want to be able to expa nd their operation . A gentleman in the audience took atrong except ion to M1. Bedore '■ co.nent ■, and •t ■t ■d that he wo uld not remain in the meeting li ■tenlng to her 1tatem■nt1 . H..r, Ladewig aga in addre ■t1 ed th ■ Commi111ion, pointing out that the approval of th ■ B-2 Zoning would a l l ow th ■ non-conforming bu ■ine ■■e ■ to ■.xp&nd. Hr. Wanu ■h pointed out that the axpan ■lo n of a u ■e ■u ch •• Conoco, which l e automotive-related, wou ld require approval of the Coan i ■■ion through the Con- ditional Uae proce ■■; thl ■ would require a Public Hearing before th ■ CO..i.1- ■ion and the property wo uld have to be po ■t ■d giving notice of the Hearln9. the condit ional Uae provialon doe ■ provlde a means to reduce th ■ impact a - 9iv ■n u ■e may have o n the e urrounding propertiea. M.r . Wa nu ■h aleo pointed out that if complaints were regi ■te red regarding the "revving " of the race car, th i ■ could be proh ibited through the Conditional U ■• procaa ■. Dave Broc k , 7005 Sou th Aah Ci rc le , wa ■ ■worn in, Mr . Brock ■tated that he wanted to a ■k that the B-1 tone Di ■tric t be ame nded to incl ude pawn ■hop•, Kr, Brock was advi sed that thi ■ was not the time to addre11 thi e i ■1u ■, and ad vi ■ed to wait unt.il Publlc Forum to apeak t o the ma ~ter. John Parry, 3216 South Lincoln, wa ■ sworn i n . He testifie d ha t ■ oppo1ed to t h ■ B-2 extension to South L i nco ln Street. He stated t hat it ha ■ com■ to hi ■ attent ion that the owner s of the Co noco St ation want to exp11.1 d and ha i ■ o p- posed to t he e xpansion; thl.a wil l mean more mechanics, and d lac u ■aed the f act that "Mel " dr ives a big bl ack truck and takae corn ers vary "qu ic kly ". H• ■t a ted that the Police Department ha ■ bean c all ed many tim e ■, but alway ■ ar- rive t oo late to issue citations. Hr . Par r y convnen ded the bu ■i ne ■a operation of Hr. Culli fer . Hr. Cullifer at s ted that he l a of ho opinion that the Conoco e tation haa e l Lmln atad the "hot-rodde r ", and that he himself had f i.led a co'Tlp l a int. Mr . S(:hu ltz. asked 1.f anyone else wished to address the Convu ea ion . No one el•• dl.d ao. Hr . Schultz then asked d there were questlons f rom the Commi a - ■ion of anyo ne who had apoken. Glynn moved: Tobin ■ec o nded: The Publ1.c Hear1.n9 on Ca se 1 8-91 be cloaed . -11 - AYIS1 NAYS1 Glynn , Schultz, Shoop , Tob1.n , Oaviet, Draper , Ourrrnar, Gerlick Nona USINT I Coven ■ ABST~IN 1 Nona The mo t ion carr l ed . Ka . Tobin ■ugg aatad that apead bumpa bo inatallad in the alley . Hr . Wanu ■h a tated th at the Corrrnia a ion c annot r e quire apeed bump• as a condition of th ■ rez.on l.ng, but i t c an certa i n ly b e recommended . Ha . Tob i n stated that aha wanted th i ■ included a ■ part of t ho r ocommendation . Ka. Dav i.et inqu ired about i n clud i ng Hr . Cullifer '■ property (3299-1/2 South Lincol n) in the B-2 rez.oning. Hr. Wan uah pointed out that a rule-of-thumb i ■ you do not ••pot z.o na ". Ha . Da vi.et d iecu a ■ed her c oncern with th ■ revocation o f th ■ v ar i a nce by the Board of Ad justment, pointing ou t that t h ia wa ■ cau ■in; th ■ cl o ■ura of a revenue s ou r ce . Hr , Stitt •tated t hat Mr. Cullifer had oper- ated the bua ineaa fo r aeveral years u ndar a v ar iance, thi• va.rianc:e had ■e ve r a l c:o nd i tiona attachec; to it, Lnclud i ng a y e arly revlew . The Board di ■- cu ■aed on aev eral occa a l ona r evo,..ing tho var i ance becauae Hr . Cullifer waa not i n compli ance with t he other condit i o n• i mpo•ed on h im , ■uch •• the n umber of v ehi cle ■ he could wo rk on or have p arked o n t he pro perty . At the laat hear- ing, earlier in thia year , Hr . Cullifer admitted ha wa ■ not in c ompliance with the cond i t io n ■, and pro bably would not be, the Bo ard decided that •enou9h waa enough •, and rev oked the v a riance . Mr. Stitt ■tata d t hat if Mr , Cullifer wiahed to appea l , the course of appeal is to t he District Cou rt . Mi:. Dunner etated that i f the ColM\iaeion were to z.one juet Hr. Cullifer•• par- c el on Lincoln, would he sti ll have t o con form to the pr ovi a io n ■ of the variance. H.r, Wanu ■h etated that Hr . Cullifer would have to aak for approval of a Condit iona l Uee, which i s admin i stered by t h e Pl anning Commi ■aion and not the Board o f Ad just me nt. Oiacu a eio n ensued. Ha . Oaviet stated t hat aha felt Hr. Cull i fer·• al uation should have the benef i t o f bei ng heard by City Coun- ci l, and tha t ,i.h e wanted t o include h ie pr o perty in tt',e B-2 zo n e claasif ication. Hr . Shoop a eke d the Chamber of Commerce· o op i n ion o n the rez.o n i ng . Hr . Stitt atate d that t he Chamber recommended t hat the rez.oning be extended to the cen- terline o f South Ac oma and South Li ncoln. H.a. Tobin stated tha if only the one p r opert y on South Lincoln were to be i ncluded in B-2, thi s could open the d oor t o pro blems in the f uture. Hr . Wan ush ag reed. r'li.scussion en sued . Daviet moved: Glynn seconded: The P l anning COIM\iss ion racorrrnend to Clty Council that the f ollo":ing are& be rezoned from B-1, Busine ss, to B-2 Bu a i - nr As, with the proper ty addressed as 3229 -1 /2 Sou th Li ncoln o be inc luded in the B-2 D1at.r 1ct: Beginning at t he cen- terlines of South Broadway and Eastman Avenue; then west alon the centerline of Wes t Eastman Ave nu e t.o the c enter- line of South Ac oma St reet ; then south al ong the c enterline cf Sou t h Acoma St reet a di.stance of 452.43 feet, more or :ess ; then east to t he cente r line o f Sout h Broadwa y; then s outh al cng the cent.erli.ne of South Bro ad,..·ay to the c e nter- une f Floyd Avenue, tl-.er, e a st along the c enterline o f -12 - la ■t Floyd Avenue to th• centerline of t he South Broadway/ Sout h Li nc oln Street Alley, then north along t he c ent ■r11.ne of th ■ South Broadwa y/Sout h Lincoln Street alley to the c ente rl i ne of Ea1t Ea ■tman Avenue, then we ■t alon9 th ■ can-A t ■rlin ■ of l a ■t 1.s ■tman Avenue to th ■ c1nt1rlln1 of south - Broadway. Di1c u11 1.on ■n ■u ■d on clarl f ication of th ■ addr111 9iv1n by Hr . Cullifer. Mr, Cu llifer 1tat 1d that h e own ■ the properti ■■ addr111ad •• 3225-3229 South Lin - c oln Streat, and that th ■ garage i ■ a d t raa ■e d •• 3229-1/21 t h ■ garage doe ■ e xtend aero ■■ t h ■ rear of both proper ti ■a , Hr . Wanu ■h ■mphaai z ■d that th ■ rer.onlng cannot 1nco mpa1 ■ only a portion of th ■ lo t ■• H ■, Davi■t amended her motion to ancomp111 propertie ■ addr■•••d a ■ 3225-3229- 3229-1/2 South Llncoln ln the B-2 ruonlng, M ■• Tobin ex pre ■■•d concern that thi• r ■zonin9 of property on south Li ncoln Will negat ivel y affect tho ■• people who ■tatad t hat thay didn't want 8 -2 &on i nq . It wo u ld appear frOl'I thi ■ tha t th ■ auto capair bu ■in••• could e xpand to tha front portion ■ of t h • owner ■hip under th• 9-2 Di ■trict. H ■. Dav iet a ■ked i f there could not ba condit io n ■ impo ■ed that wo u ld prevent the expan- 1lon of the auto repair bu aln••• to the front portion of the lot ■• Mr . Wanu ■h pointed out that cond iti on ■ can ba placed on a ,.Conditional U ■a '", but t hat if the entire prop9:rty were to ba rar.oned to B-2, th ■ entire property could ba u ■ad for t he auto repair buain•••· Further di ■cu ■■ion followed . Th ■ vote on M ■, Daviet •• motion , a ■ a.me nded, wa ■ called : AYl!S: oaviat, Ouft'l'l'tar, Glynn NAYS: Schul tz,Shoop, Tobin, Draper , Garlick A8SZNT 1 Cove n ■ ABSTAIN : None Th• motion fal.lad . Kr . Garl ick ■ta ted t hat he understood Hr . Cullifer '■ plight, but that rezoning only that o ne property le the wrong wa y to addr ■•• the ia ■ua. Garl ick moved : Tobin aeconded: The Plann i ng Corrm ieaion r -,convnend t-:> City Co uncil t hat the rezoning of the fo llowing desc ribed area from B-1, Bu ■i ne sa , t o B-2, Buainaee be approved: Be ginn ing at the cen- ter lines of South Broadway and Eaatman Avenue; tiien wait along t he centerl ine of Weet Eaetman Avenue to the center- line o f South Acoma Street; then south along the c enter line of s ou th Acoma Street a diatance of 4 52. 43 feet, more or l ea ai then east t o the ::;;iterline o f south Broadway : t hen s ou t h along the c enterl lne ?f So uth Broadway t o the center- line o f Floyd Avenue, then e~at along the centerline of Eaet }'loyd Ave nue to the center'"lna o f t he South Broadway/ South Lincoln Street Al lay ; then 1•orth along ti centerl lne of the South Br oadway/South Llncc. l n Street alley to the centerl intt of Eaat Eastman Avenue; then west along the cen-· terllne o f East Eas tm~n Avenue to the c enterline of south Broadway. -13 - Conwni11lon member ■ expra ■■•d t heir conc~rn for Hr . C ull ifer'■ ■ituation, but empha ■izad t ho need t o b • c o9niz.ant o! the impact ■uch • r1zonin9 would have had on the naighbo,:hood •• a whole. It w11 further pointed out that if Hr . Cullifer wi ■had t o reapply to the 80 .:.rd for a variance, it appeared a numb ■r of hi ■ n ■l 9h bor1 w•tr• i n a upport o f the bu 1 in 11 ■ h ■ operated . Th• vote wa ■ call1d1 AYIS 1 To bin, Draper , Du mm■r ,Cerll c k , Clynn, Schultz NAYS I Shoo p, Da v l e t ABStNT i C ov en ■ ABSTA IN I Non ■ Thi motio n c a rr l ad . Mr . Schult& thanked a ll member ■ of the audience for their attendance, and 1tat1d that the matter wil l be referred to th ■ City Council for co n ■lderation . Ci ty council will a l ■o have to hold a PublJc Hearing, which will require th• property to a91in b ■ po ■t ■d and pub lic not ice placed in t he of ficial city new ■pap■r . Ma . Da viet a ■ked to be •xcu ■ed from t he m1 ■tin9. V , PUBL IC FORUM Hr . David Brock, 7005 South A ■h Circ l e, Littleton 80122, addre ■■l d the Coani1- 1i.on , and requested t hat con ■id ■ration be g iven to amending the B-1 Zone Di ■- trict to a llow Pawn Shope •• a per,nitted pr i nc i pal u••· Mr. Brock likened pawn ■hop 11 to financia l in1titution1, etore ■ that oell camara ■, mualc in ■tru menta, jewelry, a ntl que ■, etc. Pawn ah op ■ are allowed in the B-2 Zone Di ■- trict, and Mr . Br ock a ■ked that they be allowed in the B-1 Di ■t r ic t in addition . Kr, Schultz 11tated that the Conni ■■ion would di rect eta(t to do ba~kground re ■earch and get back to th ■ Conmla ■ion with a report . Hr. Brock a ■ked when he could expec t a public hear i ng on h ia request . Mr. Schultz stated that whan the commia alon det e rmlnea a dat,1 on the i ■au e , Hr. Bro ck would be notified. No one else add r e ssed the Conwniaa ion under Pub l ic Forum . VI. DIRECTOR 'S CHOICE, Mr . Wanuah remlnd e d C ommi a ■lon me mbe r• o f the study seaa ion wi t h Ci t y Counc i l o n No vember 25 at 61 0 0 P .H. Th i a meet ing will be i n t he Co mmu n ity Room. The me e t ing of De c ember 3rd will be on "houaekeeplng" i aa ue a i n t he Zoning Or d inanc e . VII . COMM ISSIONER 'S C~OICE . Hr . Dr a p er ag ain dlacua9ed h l a f r ustratio n wi th the s ignal timi ng a t Da r t mo uth and Broa dway, and the need !or l ef t-tu r n ing a r r owe a t t h ia i.nteraect ion . Hr. Gerlick br iefly discussed the rezoning i s sue heard prev i o usly t h i s eve- ning , a nd e x pressed hie bel1ef that it wa s handled in the beet possible wa y. -14 - West Eastman Avenue -Q) a., ... -V) .::....,.,c=;.,!=~~ ca E 0 (.) <( :>J l---'--,.cl :E ::, 0 (/) (J) 02' West Floyd Avenue /5) o, ® >, ! ca e co .t:. .... ::, 0 Cl) l000COOl)OQ( 7l .. -----.. -- !:t _ ----~-- . ,,. .. ---: ....... - --• --,1, __ :.. ~ ------- ~~ """°"""''"'y_~ A 0)9 006 : 007 00, 001 I 141.S I 126) ... (/$ 00 1 oo a 001