HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008 Resolution No. 088• RESOLUTION NO. _1$.._
SERIES OF 2008
A RESOLUTION APP ROVING THE DEVELO PM ENT REV IEW APPLICAT ION FEE
SCHEDULE FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.
WHEREAS , the dc"•iopmen t application and assoc iated fees were es tab li shed by City
Co unci l in the earl y I 980's; and
WHEREAS , the City of Englewood adopted the Unifi ed De velop ment Code (UDC) whic h
required addi tiona l modificatio,,s to the Development Revi ew Appli ca tio n Fee Sched ule s~ that it
is co mpatible with the UDC; and
WHEREAS , the Engle wood City Co unci l pass ed Reso lution No . 56, Series of 2004, which
updated previous app lica tion fe es;
WHEREAS , City staff conduc ted a survey of ten munic ipalities along the Front Range
reganding their development fees ; and
WHERE · ·e passage of thi s proposed Reso lution show s both an increase a·.,d a decrea se in
the Englewov.. -ommunity Development Fees and ensures that the fees that Englewood
Community De ve lopment charges re fiect the actual cut of administrating such fee s;
NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT RESOI 'ED BY THE CITY COUNCll.. OF THE CITY OF
• ENGLEWOOD , CO LORADO , TH AT:
Sectjon I. City Council he, eby npproves the City of Eng lewood Deve lopmen t Review Fee
Schedule, attached hereto as Exhibi t A.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 15th day of December, 2008 .
k.K . 1,\~4,,J) (J ..... es K . Woodward, Ma yo r '
•
•
•
Exhibit A
Ci ty of Englewood
Deve lopment RcY iew Fee Schedule
Zoninl! Variance an d Acliuslmcnts a nd Anneals
Application Type Application Fee
Admlnli.lra tlve Adjus lmen t S1 25
Aooe~I $1 25
Va ri;m ce $1 25
ZoninlURezonin1.
ADulication Tvoe Aoo licall on fe e
Amendm,mt to an Approved PUD SoOO + $JOO/acre
or TSA E>.panslon or PD
Ba se Dl strlc l Rezone $600 + $JOO /acre
Plann ed Unit De veloo ment $14 50
Transit Stati on Area $14 50
ld~bdlll an u v1onan dD eve onment
_fil).1!!!£ation Tvoe Aooli ca lion Fee
Administrative Proper' $1 75
Combi nati on
Admini strative Subd :vlsion $200
Ann e:catl on $650 + $JOO /acre
Bour.darv line Adlustm ent $240
Mal or Subdivblon $1000
Minor Subdivis ion $600
Va cation of Easemen t SI 25
Vacallon of RI.Ah l of Way $4 50
Use Permils
Appllcallon Type Aonllcallon Fee
Conditional Use Pemli l i475
Conditi onal Use An nual S25
lnsnecllon
Hlsl oric Deslgnalion Applica ti on $125
Adaptive Re-use of Historic
Struc ture
Landscape Fee -In -Lieu S 1.5 0 per sq ua re foo t o ( req uired
la nds caped area
limited Us e Perm it $1 50
Tem po ra ry Use Pe rmit $75
Written Rcnucsls
Applicalion Type App lica lion Fee
Address Assignme nt Reques t $50
ChanRe o ( Addres s Reau cst S50
Encroac hment Ag,e cm e11t • $50
Administrati ve
Encroachmeni Agreeme nt • Ci ty $150
Council
Flo od Plain Cc rllO ca te of $200
Compliance
Cro up living Fa dll l}' R cgis lrn li on
Nonconfo rm lnu Use Reuis lratlon $50
Wriucn Zonin11 VeriO cati on $50
Prop osed Fee
$1511
$150
Sl50 --
Pronos ed Fee
$1000
$1000
$1S00
$1500
Pronosed fee •
$100
$100
$1000
$100
$1000
$600 -$250
$S00
Proposed Fee
$S00
S25
$2S0
$2S0
$ 1.50 per square foo l o(
required lands caped
area
$150
$75
Prooosed Fe e
$50
--SSv
$50
$150
$200
$SO
sso
sso
•
•
•
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Date : I Agenda Item :
December 15, 2008 1 1 c i I
Subject :
Deve lopm ent Re view Fee Sched ul e
Initi ated By:
Community D eve lop ment D epartm ent I
Staff So urc e:
Audra L. Kirk, Plann ing Te chnician
PREVl 0US COUNCIL ACTION
The p roposed fee schedul e was reviewed by Council at th e study session on D ece mber 8, 2008.
RECOM M ENDED ACTION
Staff recommends th at Ci ty Cou ncil consid N and app rove a reso luti on for th e propose d
D evel opment Review Fee Sch, d ul e as outlined in Exhibit A.
BACKGROUND
The City of Englewoo d's cur rent deve lopment rev iew fe('s and associa ted cos ts ha ve not been
u pdated sin ce Jun e 2004. To determ ine if th ~ City's de ve lopment re view fees are up-to-date and
comparable w ith other citi es, staff conduc ted a survey of ten ( 10) mun ici palities along the Fr on t
Range . Th ose munici p alities are : Arvada , Aurora, Cas tl e Rock, Denve r, Greenwood Vi ll age,
Lakewood, Littl eton, Lone Tr ee, Wes.mins ter and Wheat Rid ge .
To establish guid elines for th e survey, two (2) objectives were determined for assess ment of th e
City's current de velopment applications and associated fe es. Th ose obj ec ti ves are identified b elow:
To re view th e City's current develo pm ent review fees ensurin g th at th ey provide
reaso nabl e cos t recovery for ':l a;f ti me and res ource~; and
To compare th e City's ex isti ng and p roposed deve lopment rev iew fees to ensure tha t they
remain equitable w ith o ther Fro nt Rang e j uri sdic tions.
Th e proposed fees show both an increase and a decrease in current fees. Staff eva lu ated th e fees
and th e workload associated w ith th e fees . Fees sh owing a propose d i nc rease require more tim e,
res ources, and involve ment from staff. Th e ti me and in volve m ent is also re quired fr om the Plannin g
and Zoning Commission, Boa rd of Adjustm ents and Appea ls and Coun cil. Th e proposed in c reases
would all ow for a reaso nab le cos t recovery.
Several of th e p rop osed fees show a decrease ir cost. Staff rev iewed th e workl oad as,ocia ted wi th
th ese fees and believes ri1a t the w ork loa d does n ot warrant the current amount charge d an d ha s
reduced the fees to rdect tha t.
The surv ey did ensure th at th e fees charged are in line with oth er Fr on t Range jurisdic tions .
FINANCIAL IMPACT
D evelo pment •eview fees are a sourc e of re ve nue and th e amount of reven ue generated dep ends
upon the number and type of applicati ons submitted to the department.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
•
•