Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966-12-05 (Regular) Meeting MinutesI I I I REGULAR MEETING: COUNCIL CHAJlqERS CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO December 5 . 1966 The City council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado, met in regular session on Monday, December 5, 1966, in the Council Chambers, City Hall, Englewood, at the hour of 8:00 P.M. Mayor Pro Tern Fullerton presiding called the meeting to order and the invocation was given by Reverend Kimbrough of the Englewood Methodist Church. The Mayor Pro Tern asked for roll call. Upon the call of the roll, the following persons were present: councilmen Hanson, Kreiling, Ludwig, Parkinson, Rice, Fullerton. Absent: Mayor Allen. Also Present: City Manager Dial, Assistant City Manager Malone, City Attorney Criswell, City Clerk Lyon. The Mayor Pro Tern declared a quoroum present. COUNCILMAN RICE MOVED, COUNCILMAN HANSON SECONDED, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS OF NOVEMBER 7, AND NOVEMBER 21, BE APPROVED. Councilman Kreiling stated that the motion in the November 7, 1966, Minutes concerning the Board of Career Service reconunendations should read "Councilman Kreiling moved, councilman Rice seconded, that the City council not take actio~·on the reconanendations of the Board of Career Service conanissioners .until after a meeting with the board." COUNCILMAN RICE AMMENDED HIS MOTION TO READ THAT THE NOVEMBER 21, 1966, CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES BE APPROVED AS WRITTEN AND THAT THE NOVEMBER 7, 1966, CITY COUNCIL MINUTES BE APPROVED WITH THE CORRECTION TO THE MOTION CONCERNING THE BOARD OF CAREER SERVICE COMMISSIONERS RECOMMENDATION READ AS FOLLOWS: "COUNCILMAN KREILING MOVED, COUNCILMAN RICE SECONDED, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL NOT TAKE ACTION ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF CAREER SERVICE COMMISSIONERS UNITL AFTER A MEETING WITH THE BOARD." COUNCILMAN HANSON STATED THAT HE WOULD ACCEPT MR. RICE'S AMMENDMENT TO HIS MOTION. Upon the call 9f the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Hanson, Kreiling, Ludwig, Parkinson, Rice, Fullerton. Nays: None. Absent: Mayor Allen. The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion carried. Mayor Pro Tern Fullerton recognized the following "Special Citizen Invitees" and welcomed them to the Council meeting: Mr. and Mrs. Harry Fleenor, 3383 South Corona Street. Mr. Ball of GEM Liquors and Mr. Perry of Belleview Bowl, appeared before council in regard to the renewal of their respective liquor licenses for the year 1967. COUNCILMAN LUDWIG MOVED, COUNCILMAN KREILING SECONDED, THAT THE RETAIL LIQUOR STORE LICENSE HELD BY GEM LIQUORS AND THAT THE THBEE-WAY LIQUOR LICENSE HELD BY BELLEVIEW BOWL BE RENEWED FOR THE YEAR 1967. Upon the Call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Hanson, Kreiling, Ludwig, Parkinson, Rice, Fullerton. Nay s: None. Absent: Mayor Allen. The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion carried. The minutes of the Planning and Zoning Conanission meeting of November 8, 1966, were received for the record. The minutes of the Planning and Zoning Conanission, special meeting of November 23 , 1966, were received for the record. 411 412 Minutes of December 5, 1966 The minutes of the Board of Career Service Conanissioners meeting of November 17, 1966 were received for the record with a memorandum reconanending that the Veterans' Preference be granted to those people serving in the armed forces of the country during the Korean conflict and during the Vietnam conflict. Discussion ensued. It was the consensus of the council that the City Attorney be instructed to draw up an Ordinance adopting the policy reconanended by the Board of Career Service Co111nissioners. Introduced as a Bill by Councilman Fullerton. BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. 23, SERIES OF 1966 AN ORDINANCE VACATING AN ALLEY EAST OF 4500 SOUTH ELATI STREET BETWEEN WEST STANFORD AVENUE AND WEST TUFTS AVENUE BUT RETAINING AN EASEMENT FOR UTILITIES THERE- IN. COUNCILMAN FULLERTON MOVED, COUNCILMAN PARKINSON SECONDED, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 23, SERIES OF 1966, BE PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL IN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD AND ENTERPRISE. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: councilmen Hanson, Kreiling, Ludwig, Parkinson, Rice, Fullerton. Nays: None. Absent: Mayor Allen. The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion carried. City Attorney Criswell stated that he wished to call to the Council's attention to a tyT;>Ographical error contained in the Model Traffic Code. Mr. Criswell stated that the last sentence of I 25.2-2 should read ''It shall be unlawful to exceed the aforesaid basic speed limits or any altered speed limits as pro,rided in II 2 5. 2-3 when al 1 said speed limits are properly posted." COUNCILMAN LUDWIG MOVED, COUNCILMAN KREILING SECONDED, THAT THE LAST SENTENCE IN I 25.2-2 BE AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: "IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL TO EXCEED THE AFORESAID BASIC SPEED LIMITS OR ANY ALTERED SPEED LIMITS AS PROVIDED IN 8 25.2-3, WHEN SAID ALTERED SPEED LIMITS ARE PROPERLY POSTED." Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Hanson, Kreiling, Ludwig, Parkinson, Rice, Fullerton. Nays: None. Absent: Mayor Allen. The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion carried. The Resolution Enacting Regulations Promulgated By the Board of Career Service COlllDissioners was read in full. RESOLUTION RESOLUTION ENAC'll:NG REGULATIONS PROMULGATED BY THE BOARD OF CAREER SERVICE COMMISSIONERS. WHEREAS, I 6.6-3 of the Municipal Code of the City of Englewood authorizes the Board of Career Service Conanissioners to adopt rules and regulations implemen- ting the career service system of the City, which become effective upon approval by Counc i 1, and WHEREAS, the Board of Career Service Conanissioners has adopted certain rules and regulations which it has reconanended to Council for adoption and Council has duly considered the same, NOW. THEREFORE, be it Resolved that the City Council of the City of Englewood does hereby approve, adopt and enact the following provisions which shall be a portion of the rules and regulations of said Board of Career Service Conanissioners: "Maternity Leave -A female employee of the City, subject · to the career service system, who becomes pregnant, shall be required to take maternity leave at the end of the fifth calendar month following conanencement of her pregnancy. Upon being placed on a leave status, she shall, first, be placed on a "leave-with-pay" status until she has exhausted all of her accrued annual leave and, thereafter, her status shall be "leave-without-pay". At any time within a period o~ six months after cOlll1\encement of her leave status, and after termination of her pregnancy, she may apply to the City for re-employment and shall be entitled to be re-employed in the same classification at a grade not higher than that which she held at the conanen- cement of her leave status, providing there is a vacancyiin"that classification ~* a preferential re-employment list for that classification for a period of one year and shall be offered re-employment in that classification at not higher than her former grade, should any vacancy occur during the one-year period. Should she be re-employed by the City, her length of service shall be dated from the date she was originally hired, less all time on maternity leave, for future sick leave and vacation purposes." *If there is no vacancy, she shall be ~laced on · I I I I ----------,---.,------------------------~,---------~~--·------------------------ I I I I Minutes of December 5, 1966 "Related Employees -The Board of Career Service Conunissioners hereby adopt the principle that persons related by blood or marriage to City employees shall not, by that fact . be disqualified from employment with the City. However, good management principles require that City employees who are so related shall not be employed with- in the same department of the City and they shall be prohibited from being so emp- loyed or maintaining such employment. To this end, from and after the date of Council's approval of this provision, whenever two employees within the same depart- ment intermarry, or become related in another manner, one of such employees shall be transferred to another job in his or her classification in another department at a grade not higher than he or she then held, providing there is such a job vacancy or, if no vacancy, he or she shall be placed on a re-employment list for a period of one year. Which of the related employees shall be so transferred or laid off, the time therefor and other employment details necessary to be arranged to carry out this policy shall be determined by theCity Manager, subject to the right of appeal by the employee or employees involved to the Board of career Service Conunissioners." ATTEST: Ci I, Stephen A. Lyon, City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of .Englewood do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true, accurate, and complete copy of a Resolution duly passed by the City Council of the City of Englewood at its regular meeting held on Monday, the 5th day of December, 1966. COUNCILMAN LUDWIG MOVED, COUNCILMAN HANSON SECONDED, THAT THE RESOLUTION BE ADOPTED AND APPROVED. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: councilmen Hanson, Kreiling, Ludwig, Parkinson, Rice, Fullerton. Nays: None. Absent: Mayor Allen. The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion carried. City Manager Dial presented and discussed a memorandum concerning the 1967 Budget with thecity council. TO: All City Councilmen FROM: Mr. Stanley H. Dial, City Manager DATE: December 5 , 1966 SUBJECT: 1967 BUDGET As you will recall , the 1967 Budget included revenues to be received from the Shopping Center operation. At budget preparation time, the anticipated Center opening date was September 1,1967. At this time, it appears to be more nearly March, 1968. Because of this delayed opening of the Center, the 1967 Budget will be approximately $~0 .000 short of revenue in the General Fund, and $25,000 short in the Public Improve- ment Fund. Therefore, it is advisable that reconsideration of both funds be made promptly so that program delays, if any, be made before the budget is implemented. After reviewing the overall budget, I would reconunend that the following areas of cut- back be considered: GENERAL FUND: 1. Reduce number of additional firemen scheduled for January 1, 1967, from five to three, thereby reducing the 1967 Budget • • . . • • • • • . • . • 2. Delay the employment of six of the nine additional police officers from scheduled date of August 1, 1967, . •. $10,300. to January l, 1968. This would reduce the 1967 Budget by •• $18,500. 3. 4. Withold the employment of the fifth building inspector and continue to utilize four inspectors. This would provide a savings of Reduce the Library book budget by $5,000, leaving an appropriation of $23,000 for book purchases in 1967 vs. $20 ,561 in 1966, $13,369 in 1965, and $18,339 in 1964 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .•.. $ 7,000. .$ 5,000. 5. Delay capital purchases in the Public Works Department to offset approximately .•......•...• $ 9,200. TOTAL REDUCTION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • $50 I 000. 413 414 Minutes of December 5, 1966 The five areas above would be sufficient to offset the loss of revenue in the General Fund. Should the council desire not to reduce these programs, an alter- native would be to divert monies from the Public Improvement Fund. To the extent this is done, the deficiency of $25,000 in the Public Improvement Fund would be increased. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FUND: -. . · ;( - Early this year the council saw fit to substantially expand the 1966 Paving District with the expectation of financing this additional expense from surplus sales tax income and a transfer of $25,000 from the Storm Drainage Account. This leaves the Storm Drainage appropriation at approximately $QS,OOO for the current year.* The total accumulated appropriations for 1967, which must be reduced by $25,000 are as follows: Paving District (Rights of Way only) ••• ~ • $ 15~000. Storm Drainage ....•........•.•.. $150,000. Park Improvements ..••.•.••••..•.•• $ 50,000. Traffic Signal Installations . . • . .$ 40,000. South Bannock Street Bridge •...•.•.•.•• $ 20,000. Improvements at West Union Avenue at South Santa Fe Drive ....•..••.... $ 22,500. Improvement of West Tufts Avenue in connection with above • • . . • • • . • • • • $ Aerial Ladder Truck ••••..•••.•••••• $ Central Garage • • .••..•..•••• $ 3,500. 32,500. 58,000. Total ••••••••.•.•••••••••• $391,500. Your review and consideration of this matter should be given priority so that your direction to the administration may be implemented promptly. /s/ Stanley B. Dial STANLEY H. DIAL City Manager SHD/ij *The necessary action to make these adjustments will be prepared for your consideration on December 19th. Mr. Dial pointed out that the delay of the New Englewood Shopping Center com- pletion to March 1968, would cause the City of Englewood to realize approximately $75 000.00 less revenue that originally anticipated. Approximately $50,000.00 would not be received in the General Fund and approximately $25,000.00 would not be received in the Public Improvement Fund. Discussion ensued. COUNCILMAN LUDWIG MOVED, COUNCILMAN RICE SECONDED, THAT MR. RICHARD DITTEMORE 8E APPOINTED AS ASSOCIATE MUNICIPAL JUDGE. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Hanson, Kreiling, Ludwig, Parkinson, Rice, Fullerton. Nays: None. Absent: Mayor Allen. The Mayor Pro Tem declared the motion carried. City Manager Dial stated that council consideration of appointment of a Library Board member to succeed the unexpired term of Mr. Jack Katchur had been tabled by the City Council at the November 7, 1966, meeting. COUNCILMAN LUDWIG MOVED, COUNCILMAN RICE SECONDED, THAT CONSIDERATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF A LIBRARY BOARD MEMBER TO SUCCEED MR. JACK KATCHUR"S UNEXPIRED TERM BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as f-:...1 ·1.a follows: Ayes: Councilman Hanson, Kreiling, Ludwig, Parkinson, Rice, Fullerton. Nays: None. Absent: Mayor ~llen. The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion carried. I I I I -....,..------,,--,---,--------------------------------------~--·---------------- I I I I Minutes of December 5, 1966 COUNCILMAN HANSON MOVED, COUNCILMAN PARKINSON SECONDED, THAT MR. JACK C. MAXWELL BE APPOINTED TO FILL THE UNEXPIRED TERM OF MR. JACK KATCHUR ON THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: councilman Hanson, Kreiling, Ludwig, Parkinson, Rice, Fullerton. Nays: None. Absent: Mayor Allen. The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion carried. City Manager Dial discussed the fire which occured on December 4, 1966, at 3029 S. Fox in which two children were suffocated. Mr. Dial stated that he found that the actions of the Fire and Police Departments were both prompt and proper. City Manager Dial presented the 1967 dues for the Colorado Municipal League for approval by the City Council. Mr. Dial stated that the 1967 dues are $2 ,330.70 . which is an increase of approximately $150.00. Discussion ensued. councilman Kreiling stated that he would like to see a copy of the Colorado Municipal Leagues ' 1967 Budget. City Manager Dial stated that he had been contacted by downtown merchants in regard to broadcasting Christmas carols through a public· address system in the· downtown area. . COUNCILMAN HANSON MOVED, COUNCILMAN KREILING SECONDED, THAT THE B~OADCASTING OF CHRISTMAS CAROL MUSIC IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA BE APPROVED AND THAT THE OPERATIONS OF THE PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM BE REQUESTED TO ATTEMPT TO KEEP THE NOISE LEVEL LOW. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Hanson, Kreiling, Ludwig, Parkinson, Rice, Fullerton. Nays: None. Absent: Mayor Allen. The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion carried. Mr. Dial stated that he had received a petition presented by Mr. John J. Ahrend, 2255 w. Jamison Way. The petition called for the Denver Water Doard to close the south end of the Hi-Line Canal service road from South Windimere Street to the Douglas County Line Road due to the fact that it had become a public traffd.c way and was creating anuisance to residents of the area. Mr. Dial stated that Mr. Ahrend wanted the City council to sign the petition which will be presented to the Denver Water Board. Discussion ensued. It was the consensus of council that the City Manager write a letter to the Denyer Water Board stating the City of Englewood's concurrence with the purpose of the petition. We . the undersigned property owners, adjacent to the High Line Canal, petition to close the south end of High Line Canal service road from So. WINDERMERE ST. to the Douglas County Line Road, to be used only by the property owners and the Denver Waterboard for pur.poses of maintenance. November 14, 1966. NAME Wes Corder Frieda M. Corder Harlow J. Siep Melda H. Siep John J. Ahrend Heddy J. Ahrend Marcia F. Curry, M.D. Nelda J. Joodwin George Woodward Hester E. Woodward Hazel Smith Orwin Smith William H. Eggers Erma H. Eggers John z. Nilson Alice G. Nilson Norman Losh Carol Losh ADDRESS 395 Shadycroft Dr. 395 Shadycroft ·Dr. 7500 So.Prince 7500 So. Prince 2255 w. Jamison Way 2255 W. Jamison Way 2100 W. Jamison Way 2100 w. Jamison Way 7550 So. Prince 7550 So. Prince 7494 So. Prince 7494 S. Prince St. 405 Shadycreft Dr. 405 Shadycraft Dr. 805 Shadycroft Drive 805 Shadycroft Drive 375 Shadycroft Dr. 375 Shadycroft Dr. City Manager Dial reported that the annual Prayer for Peace Program would be held at the Englewood City Hall on December 7, 1966, at 7:30 P.M. 415 I 416 Minutes of December 5, 1966 City Manager Dial stated that there would be an Inter-County Regional Planning Connission dinner meeting to discuss library service within the Denver Metropolitan Area on Wednesday, December 14, 1966. City Manager Dial passed out a memorandum containing the information requested by councilman Rice for use by the City Hall Financing conunittee. TO: City Hall Study Committee: Councilman Rice, Chariman: Councilmen Fullerton and Ludwig, Members FROM: Mr. Stanley H. Dial, City Manager DATE: December 5, 1966 SUBJECT: CITY HALL Attached is a copy of I>eople's Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1964, which sets forth the terms of the lease of the City Hall Building and the option to purchase stipulations. You will note that the purchase price is $900,000 during the first fi v e years of the lease, or until November, 1969, less an allowance of $1,910 per month for the time the lease has been in effect. After November, 1969, the purchase price would be $764,000, less an allowance of $1,910 per month for the time the lease has been in effect, plus the appraised fair market value of the land as if unimproved and unleased provided that such option is exercised before the end of the eighth year of the lease. The terms of the lease require the City to make up the first three years deferred payments at the time of purchase, plus interest at six per cent. It should also be pointed out that rental payments, reduced for the first three years of the lease, will accelerate effective January 1, 1968, to the rate of $110,752 for five years after which time rental payments will be $76,920 per year for the remainder of the lease. Following are several methods by which the City could finance purchase of the City Hall should the City Council elect to exercise its option to purchase. There may be other feasible methods, but the ones below are the more obvious ones and can perhaps provide a feasible alternative. This office, or the City Attorney's office, would be happy to investigate thoroughly any method which the Conunittee desires further information about. 1. General Obligation Bonds: (a) A General Obligation Bond Issue, bearing the full credit and backing of the City of Englewood, is perhaps the most obvious method of financing the City Hall. General Obli- gation aonds would also be the most economical method in that they would bear a lower rate of interest than any other type of security issued for this purpose. A Bond election of the taxpaying electors of the City would be required and the issuance of General Obligation Bonds would reduce the debt capacity of the City for other general purposes. Englewood's debt limitation, as established in Section 104 of the Home Rule Charter, is 3% of the assessed valuation of the taxable properties within the City as shown by the last preceding assessment for tax purposes. ($51,420,375 assessed valuation, 1966, x 3% = $1,542,611.) There is no General Obligation debt of the City charged against the legal debt limit at this time. Maturity dates and terms of the Bonds, according to Section 104 of the Home Rule Charter, are to be pro- vided for in the proposition submitted to the taxpaying electors. Therefore, the City is not restricted to a fifteen-year bebt program, but may set any term for bonds that would be acceptable to the taxpaying electors. Assuming a $900,000 Bond Issue, and assuming 5% inter- est over a period of fifteen years, the City's average annual bond retirement and interest payments would be $85,416, or approximately 1.71 mills, based upon the 1966 assessed valuation. (This assumes a level amount of principal and interest per month.) (b) A general Obligation Bond Issue on the basis of sales tax revenues is a possibility according to Tallmadge and Tallmadge , Bond Attorneys. Attached is a copy of a letter from Mr. William Lamb of Tallmadge and Tallmadge, directed to Mr. Carl Broberg, City Manager of Littleton, Colorado. I I I I I I I I 2. Minutes of December 5, 1966 This information would be applicable to the City of Englewood and specific confirmation from Tallmadge and Tallmadge can be obtained, if desired. Approval by the taxpaying electors of the City would be necessary and issuance of General Obligation Bonds to be paid from Sales Tax revenues would be charged against the legal debt limit of the City. Financing by this means would have the distinct ad- vantage that sales tax revenues would be obligated rather than a mill levy. Should sales tax revenues become insufficient, then, and only the.,would a tax levy be required. Although it appears that less than the total sales tax receipts could be pledged for debt retirement, this would need to be definitely established. Furthermore, the expectations of prospective bond purchasers could have considerable bearing on the manner in which a pledge of sales tax income would be handled. Maturity dates and terms of the bonds would be provided for the proposition submitted to the taxpaying electors. First Mortgage Leasehold Bonds: Under the Lease Purchase Plan, a non-profit corporation, known as "The City of Englewood Public B\lilding Authority" would be organized. Directors of the Authority would be interested residents of the City of Englewood, appointed by the Council, but cannot be either Council members or members of the City administration. The City would lease the ground on which the City Municipal Building would be constructed to the Authority for a nominal yearly charge. The Authority would borrow the funds necessary to construct the building according to the City's plans and specifications, and lease the building to the City on a year-to-year basis at a specified aggregate rental over a period of fifteen to thirty years. After the total rentals have been paid over the designated time, the land and the building would be transferred free and clear to the City. This method of financing does not require a bond election and the bonds would not be a legal debt of the City, but would be secured by a first mortgage on the building and an assignment of the rentals to be paid by the City to the Authority. Yearly rentals to be paid by the City would be in an amount approximately equal to the yearly principal and interest requirements on the bonds. In asking the City Attorney to provide us with current changes in the law that might affect this method of purchase, it has been pointed out that from a legal standpoint, this method appears somewhat inadvisable and would require considerable review by theCity Attorney's office should further consideration be desired. Attached is a copy of a letter from Mr. Terry Paup, Assistant City Attorney, setting forth the limitations. 3. Revenue Bonds: The City may issue Revenue Bonds without approval of the electors and such bonds are not included as a part of the City's 3% debt limitation. This would mean that the Water Department and/or the Sewer Department would purchase the City Hall and rent same to the general City government. Several factors come to mind in considering this method. (a) This could be interpreted as circumventing the approval of the people and may not stand up under suit. (b) Revenue Bonds, sufficient to cover this purchase, have already been authorized, but not yet issued. (These Bonds were to be issued from West Slope water developnent.) (c) The Utilities Department could perhaps pay cash, or a large percentage by cash, utilizing unappropriated sur- pluses and funds received fran the sale of the Atchison Ranch. Estimated Unappropriated Surpluses of the Water System Operating Fund as of December 31, 1966, is $269,128. The Unappropriated Surplus in the Sewer Fund as of December 31, 1966 , is estimated to be $171.853. Receipts of the sale of the Atchison Ranch are estimated to be $425,000. (This possible alternative would compromise the financial integrity of the utilities system and might well be of questionable legality.) 417 418 Minutes of December 5, 1966 4. A combination of General Obligation Bonds and Revenue Bonds and/or cash funds fran the Water Department might be considered whereby the Utilities Department could purchase and own that portion of the building being utilized by then. This would reduce the amount of General Obligation Bonds necessary and lessen the charge against the legal debt limit. S. According to the City Attorney, Section 104 of the Home Rule Charter, requires an election as a precedent to the City contracting any debt by law , or in any form, Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds excepted. This would tend to eliminate short term borrowing from a bank or private institution. Isl STANLEY H. DIAL STANLEY B. DIAL City Manager SHD /i j At t. The list of bills, claims and invoices for December, 1966, was presented b y City Manager Dial and discussed by the City Council. COUNCILMAN PARKINSON MOVED, COUNCILMAN RICE SECONDED, THAT THE LIST OF BILLS CLAIMS AND INVOICES AS APPROVED BY THE CITY MANAGER AND LISTED BY THE CITY CLERK FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER . 1966, BE ALLOWED. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Hanson, Kreiling, Ludwig, Parkinson, Rice, Fullerton. Nays: None. Absent: Mayor Allen. The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion carried. Mayor Pro Tern Fullerton recognized Mr. and Mrs. Harry Fleenor. Mr. Fleenor thanked City council for inviting him to attend the December 5, 1966, meeting. Mr. Fleenor also congratulated the City Council on the appearance of the Council Chambers. Mayor Pro Tern Fullerton recognized Mr. Robert Murphy, Jr. of the 4-U Motel. Mr. Murphy stated that he wished to compliment Mr. Fullerton on his speech before the Chamber of commerce on December 2, 1966. City Clerk Ly on read a letter from Mr. M. M. Sununers, 3140 S. Delaware, dated December 1, 1966. Discussion ensued. It was the consensus of Council that Mr. Dial draft a letter for Mayor Pro Tern Fullerton in reply to Mr. Sununers' letter. Englewood City Council Englewood , Color ado. Gentlemen: 3140 So. Delaware Englewood, Colorado December 1st, 1966. I am referring you to the session of the City council of November 27th wherein Mayor George Allen refused to allow me to discuss the issue in question but heckled, argued , denied my statements and all but drove me from the floor. I had come by apointment to discuss a current issue of interest to all citizens, and came with evidence of interest and contribution. I have for a long time had an interest in the commercial and traffic movement of down-~-.JWn Englewood and in 1961 isecured the widening of three blocks in the down-town area -name! thw widening of the 3300 block of South Broadway also the 3500 block when Mr. Rudd was city manager. Thus I felt I had some interest and reason and right of expression in this current issue -Mr. Allen perhaps thought differently. I am impressed that the action and conduct of the Mayor was arbitrary, incon- siderate of the rights of citizens and a challenge to the dignity and purpose of the Council Body set up by the people to consider and resolve all matters brought before it, and raises the question of qualification. I am wondering if the council members endorse~·such action and accept as a council image and continue to accept it. Would you ~lease advise. Respt., M.M. Sununers • . Is/ M.M. Summers I I I I I I I I Minutes of December 5, 1966 COUNCILMAN KREILING MOVED, COUNCILMAN RICE SECONDED, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: councilmen Hanson, Kreiling, Ludwig, Parkinson, Rice, Fullerton. Nays: None. Absent: Mayor Allen. The Mayor Pro Tern declared the meeting adjourned at 9:55 P.M. ,~L-~ep .en A. Lyon~ Clerk of the council The minutes of the meeting of the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colo r ado, held on the 5th day of December, 1966, A.O., stand approved as written this 3rd day of Januar , 1966. c 419