The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1996 Resolution No. 003RESOLUTION NO. 3 SERIES OF 1996 A !ICSOLlITJON AUTHORIZING THE APPLI CATIONS FOR THE 199 7-2002 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM . WHEREAS . the Denver Regi on.I Council of Governments (DRCOG ), in cooperati on with th e Co lorado Department of'l'ransporlalion (C DOT), is cb&rgeJ with the preparation of the Tronsportntion Improvement Program (TI P }; and WHEREAS. the TIP prioritizes projec t• for Federa l 'l'ransport&hon Funds avai lable through the lr.termodal Surface Transpc•tation Effici ency Act (ISTEAJ; and WHEREAS , appli cations for ISTEA projects require a minimum 20 '1-:ocal cash match; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE SO LVED BY THE CITY COUHCJL OF THE cm· OJ ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, THAT : ~-Th e Cuy Council of th e City of Englewood, tolorad o hereby authorizes Lh ~ applications for 199i-2002 Transportati on lmprovc:nent Program the following appli cation s : State Highway 285/Broadway Interchange Bi ~~-Creek Bike Path• San ta Fe to South Platte Rh·e r South Broadway Wid en ine an~ Medians (?';00-350 0 hloc,·,J Sidewalk installati on • 3000 -3600 West Bellevi ew ..\ve nue Sirlewalk installation • 3000-3400 So ut:. ·.,n i\'er~ity Blvd . State Higia way 265 median~• Brun dwuy to Gi lp in ~. Th l' Mayor is authori zed tCI execute nnd the City Cl erk to attest and seal th e app li cation~ CE'rt ifying that matching funds .i re, or will be com mitted for the projects t hat nrc funded for and on behalf of the Cit y of Englewood , Colorad o ADOPTED A.'>D APPROVED thi s 2nd d ay of January. 1996 I, Lo ucn shia :\ Ell is, City ~-1~rk. fo r Jhc~C 1~y of En gll'\\"(1od. Co abo\'c> is n tr m· copy of Re~ol ut10n I\o . ....1_, Se rie s of 199G COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Date Agenda Item Subject Januar/ 2. 19!16 10 a iii ISTEA Applications IN ITIATED B Y STAFF SOURCE De artncnt of r u~ltc Works C harles Eslerty, Direclor of Pu blic Works <':OUNC IL GOf,L AND PREVIOUS COUIJCIL ACTION .,;:iy Council authorized applica tions for S.H 285/Broadway Interchange design in 1932 and 1993 R ECOMMENDED ACTIO N Stal' seeks Counr1I app•oval of a resolution authonz1ng lhe following applrcalrons for the 1997-2002 Transportation Improvement Program S H 285/Broadway Interchange Sig Dry Creek Dike Path• Santa Fe to South Plane River South Broadwa; \Videmng and Medians ,_700-3 500 blocks) S 1oewalk lnstallalton • 3000-3600 W Be lleview Av e Sodewalk Installation • 3000-3400 S Umvers1t/ S 285 Me.j,ans • Br0aa way to Gilpin BACKG ROU ND, AN A LYSI S , AND A l.TERN A TIVES IDENTIFIED T'-e Dem e· Reg ional Council of Go\'crnmenls (DRCOG ). in cooperation wilh the Colorado Departmenl of T•a-soortat1cr 1CDOT). Is charged with the preparation of th e Transportauon lmprovemenl Program (TI P) The T :J or1 ont 1zcs pro1ects fo r Feder al Tra nspon at1on Funds ava il ab le through the lntermodal Surface Tran sportat ion E~:ea:y Ac: IISTEA) Ap pltcaltons for ISTEA proI ects require a minimum 20% loca l cash match T ":; of these pro!ects havP ~en program-ned mto the TI P 1n pre\1::u s years The S.H 285/Broadway Interchan ge was .,corporated but never funded .. e B·g Dry Creek Bike Path Pt-ases I and 11 wrre completed under a City of l , e·on proiect apphcat1on This Phase Ill applicauon 1s being subm1ned t>y En~le wood Fu tu re subm1ttals for aco ., onal phases w 1ll come from other 1um,01ct1ons The remaining th ree projects have been 1d"11nt1fied by staff as oro;ects ehg 1ole for federal funds FINA NCIAL IMPA CT P·e !::st 1ma1ed costs for tne proiects Jrc as follows eIQJe.cJ s H :eS.Broadv.a y lnterch ang(' Big Jr, B,ke Pa:11 Brea:.'"' ay W 1den:r9 & Media ns fc: \ ew S1:i~wal~ s Vi ,t:''S '.) Sid• :,a ;kf 5 H ::s Mcu aris J~t s11 .200.000 1,183 .000 2,724 000 12 7 000 133 .000 ..J.MI..QP!) S17 21 4 000 CJ!YJi1alch S2 .240 000 80 ,000 :,45 ,000 25,000 27 000 _Jfil)..QQll S3 c86 000 ·.:: :..:~~ arj SoLth 8., ..irbari P:,1-<:s w t~='"' contribute S~2 000 t,::w.ards th(; total loca1 matc.h of S240.000 DRCOG requires the Mayor's signature certifying that matching fund s are . or will be, committed for projects that are funded . Applicants do not know which , ff any , projects wi ll be funded . Fonnai contracts with COOT are req ui red be fore any work begins LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Ap plicant ld en t,fic alion Project Recommendation Summary Fonn - DRCOG 1H7-2002 Tranaportatlon lmpl"'-ro"'w,_11 .. _ ..... nt Program RKO<'lllllendatlon Fonn 1 APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION PROJECT RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY FORM SPONSOR AG ENCY : City of Englewood Chief Adm inistrative Officer (signs su bm ittal letter): Na me Doug Clark Title City Manage r Pnone : 762-2311 Agency TIP Tech nical Contact Person : Name: David Henderson nue· Special Projects Coordinat or Address : 3400 S. Elati St. City· Englewood State· Colorado Zip : 80 11 o Phone 762-2506 Fex : 789-1125 Total Maleh Project Name TIP Project Cost Fu nds (1,000) ($1,000) SH 285/Broadway Interchange resubm it 11 ,200,000 2,240,000 8 19 Ory Creek Bike Path Hwy 85 to Riv er Phase 3 1,183,000 237 ,000 S Broadway Widening & Me dians new 2,72 4.000 545 ,000 3000-3600 W Be lleview Ave Sidewalks new 127,000 25,000 3000-3400 S University Blvd S:dewalks new 133,000 27,000 SH 285 Medians-Bro adway to Gil pin new 1,847,000 369,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST 17,214,000 3,443 ,000 LOCAL MATCH CERTIFICATION . (All pro jer.ts must be certified by the olftcial authorized to cor1mIt fund s. 1 e . Mayor or Chairm an of the Boa rd of County Commissioners) t Thomas J . Burn s. certify that I have reviewed the applications of th e pro1ects listed above and that the match ing funds have or will be com mitted for th ese proJects The --:e ma tching funds do not include past expenditures Name ___________________ Oa!C' _____ _ Title City of Englewood Januarv 4. 1996 Mr. George Schcuemstuhl, Director Transpor1tion Services Denver Regional Council of Governments 2480 West 26th Ave nue , Suite 200B Denver. Colorado 802 I I Dear Mr . Scheuemstuhl : 3400 S Elat1 Street EngleWOOd , Cootado 80110-2304 Phone (303) 762•2300 (lOJ) 762-2301 FAX (300)789·1125 The City of Englewo od is pleased to subm it the following six project applic.11 ions for inclusion into the I 99 7-2002 Transponatio n Improvement Progra m. I ) SH 285/Broadway interchange 2 ) Big Dry Creek Bike Path SH 85 Pha se Ill 3) South Broadwav Widening and Medians -1 ) 3000-3600 West Belle\~ew Avenue Sidewalks 5) 3000-3400 South Universitv Boulevard Sidewalks 6) SH 285 Medians• Bro adway to Gilpin We look fo rw ard t<' DRCOG's favorab le co nsideration of o ur requ e'"· City of Englewood PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Servieeo St-, Ma/rtenana, January 5, 1995 Spencer Mon1gomery Parks Traffic Denver Regional Council of Governments 2480 West 26th Avenue, Suite 2008 Denver. Colorado 80211 Dear Spencer: Fleet Malrtanance B<.ilding Maintenance 3400 S. El,.1 Street Engl-,oo, Coiaado 80t t~2304 Phone (303) 762 -2500 FAX (303) 789-1125 The Ci1y of Englewood TIP applicalion for SH 285/Broadway Interchange iden1ifie s !he projecl type as "Capac ity and Accessibility Improvements··. This projec1 is eligible for this ca1egory per the adopled "Policy on Transportation lmprovemeni Program Preparation". This interchange is identified in Figure 8 of the 2015 ln1erim RTP. Addi1ionally, !his interchange is on the DRCOG 1997-2002 TIP Priori1 y List As DRCOG is aware . thi s projec1 W'l.S pre vio usly adopted in the 1993-1995 TIP (=93-196). Unfortunale ly. a funding source was nol identified and the projecl was removed from the TIP . CDOT has s1a1ed !hat thi s project was in the wrong projec 1 type. This projecl is a top priority for lhe City of Englewood. We do no t wan! to risk exclusi on from th e TIP due to appl ying in !he wrong project lypc . For !his reason. we h&ve included forms 38 and JC fo r project types 4R and Opera1ional respec1ivel y. These fo rms co,tain all the information we curren tly have fo r !he imerchan ge. Thank you fo r yo ur assis lan ce wilh the proj ect application. Please call me al 762-250 6 \\i lh any comments or questious. ~l~ Da vid Hend erso n. Specia l Projec ts Coordinator Public Work s Departme nt - DftCOG 1ffl-211in Tranapo,1atlnn ~ l'rognlll ~FOlffl1 APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION PROJECT RECOIIMENDATION SUIIIIARY FORII SPONSOR AGENCY : City of Englewood Chief Adminiotrative Officer (signs submittal letter): Name : Doug Clark r111e : City Manager Phone : 762-2311 Agency TIP Technical Contact Person : Name : David Henderson r111e : Special Projects Coord ln,Jtor Address : 3400 S. Elatl St City : Englewood State : Colorado Zip : 80110 Phone: 762-2506 Fax: 789-1125 Tota l Match Project Name TIP Project Cost Funds (1 .000) ($1,000) SH 285/Broadway Interchange resubmit 11 ,200 ,000 2,240 ,000 Big Dry Creek Bike Path SH 85 Phase Iii Phase 3 1,183 ,000 237 ,000 S. Broadway Widen ing & Medians new 2,724 ,000 545 ,000 3000-3600 W. Belleview Ave Sidewalks new 127,000 25 ,000 3000-3400 S. University Blvd . Sidewalks new 133,000 27 ,000 SH 285 Medians-Broadway to G~pin new 1,847,000 369 ,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST 17 ,214 ,000 3,443 ,000 LOCAL MATCH CERTIFICATION · (All projects must be certified by the official authonzed to commit funds , , e , Mayor or Chairman of the Board of County Commissioner,; ) I. Thomas J. Bums , certify that I have reviewed the applications of the projects listed above and that the ~=a~ -::,.v:z:.,~·"'"oo~, DIIQ.'IQ 1111-311112 T,.,..,.,...._ llnp,av•••it ,...,,.., ~•••d1UCN1form2 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Page 1 (One form ,,., project) e.acu.: Project Descriplion Project Name · SH 285/BCPilllftY lalerchange Project Type (see Table 2 Appendix C):Capacjty and Acco,•ibiljty lmprpyements TIP Status (new ur resubm it):.,R,.nu.,..bwm.JlJll._ ____ _ Sponsor: Cit¥ of Engk!wood Co-SponSOB(s):._.Nl..:A.__ ______ _ Sponsor ID# (oplional): NIA Project Location : County : Arapahoe ____ City : _ _.E.,_n..,g .. kr«ood"""'""-------- P.act2-Financial Information ($1,000) Year Federal COOT LocaVRTD Total Act:-,iiles To Be Perfooned By Year _!__ ...1.ll!i!L.... ~2~6~5 __ 1.325 Pr:eliOlina,y Eog1oeerinc. _L_ ...l6!L_ ---192 ROW & Environmental __L_ I.1."d.._ ____ 1~z~a-3 __ _JLlfil_ ~ .. ctj"''own _____ _ Totals ~ __ 2 240 .11.2llO does not include prior expense) Pnor Expenses : 30 000 (S1.000) (des ign, ROW. tonslruction ) Match Source Categories (CDOT/LocaVRTD /Olher) Notes (include description of prior expenses and other comments) Qes 1an funds for tb1s oro1ect were 1ncomorated mto the J I P in prev ious years howeve r fund ing source was oat identified COOT and Enalewood shared eauallv in a Traffic Eeasibiltv Study for SH 285 from Santa Ee to Urnvers1tv - DRCOG 1"7-2002 TtanepCNtalloft i.1n, .. ., ... 111 .. v--•M-'"'""'' Pl'Clgram Recllll1w1•Nlalloft ,_ 2, Page 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM Project Name : SH 285/Broadway interchange emu Project Description Limits · SH 285 C s Broadway Bridge Length (miles), .. 0__.3"-7 ____ _ Description~""'""''-1 285 under Broadway to s"".commodate six through laoos Exl,tiog conditions allow !2lliUllLC "~rough tanes ao SH 285 Rog,nslM:1.JbLb.odM• and the ramps to ag;omgdate doubfD left-rums all directions Ooubfe teft turns exist onlY fmm eastboum.i ;;.as to north bound Broadw:ay Ecviroomental S\ · !dfes ROW design and oonstructioo are included as oan of this omtect Design Status · 1997 Cross Section Ch1racffllatlcs Exis ti ng After EA/EIS Status . 1998 Through Lane s _!_ ___L_ ROW Status : 1998 Median Type : Start Constru ction . 1999 (year} (see Tab . 4) _L_ __f__ Open to the Public: 2000 (year) Shoulder Type : (see Tab . 5) _IL. __JL_ ROW Width · (feel ) ..llW... ~ Notes : Ib.i.s...;1roject eli minates trans ition from three lanes on SH 285 to two lanes at th" Br~ __ _ ~: in both directions Double left turns at the ovemass will improve all left h;rninc. .QmitlJleOlQD. Broadway and overall efficiency of in terchana e DIICOG 11114002 TnllllpOrtallaft IN910.-1t Prognm ~ dlll11<. Ponn 3A PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA FORM CAPACITY/ACCESSIBILITY PROJECTS Project Name:SH 285/Bmadway lnlJl[change 2005 Puk Volume• (from DRCOG\' Eastbound or Northbound : ____ _ SEE ATTACHED Westbound or Southbound_· ___ _ -:apacity (Imm DRCOG): ______ _ Hazard Index Factors {3 years datal Fatal Accidents : _____ ...,._ _____ Property Accidents _·---~=------ ln1u1) Acciden ts : _____ ,_,._ _____ 1995 Annua l AOT _· ____ .1JJO,,,SwO,,Oo.Oc._ __ _ Other factors 2015 RTP Priority (DRCOG list):.,y~e~•----System Continu ity : u!Owle~n,,.·o.,rl,.cowimi,cwil"'et.,e _____ _ 2005 AwDT (from DRCOG ). ---~N1-A~ 2005 Person Miles Travel. uNlucA,_ ______ _ (HOV/Transit/New Roads ) Notes : PM PN:k hour counts for SH 285 an '! ice S emactwav were SUPPiied to DBCOG on December 8 1995 PRCOG's resooose dated December 22 1995 reouests turning movement in format ion Th is information is attached -U ~ '2..8_ S-/ 'i~ ~ \')J..v ~ 'r' t' n t='.e.~ ~ ) I ~ 5" tN \_ \Of; - ENGINEER'S DITAILED l!ITIIIAff aTHOD Project Name : SH 285/Broadw.iy lnten:h1nge Road/Facility Name : Hampde'1 Ave. at Broadway Route Number. SH 285 and SH 75 Item Bid Items (estimate) ...... Striping .. Construction Signing and Traffic Co11trol (Default• 20%) Percent Range 1 -5%of 5 -25% of M ,bilization . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 -10% of ( ~ound up to next $1 .000) (Default -7%) TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION BID ITEMS (".:Bl) Force Account Items Utilities ... 1-3%of CBI Contingencies .... 15% of CBI TOTAL OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS (Cl) COOT Construction Engineering (CE) 10-15%01 Cl CE Indirects (,5% of CE) . Pre limin ary Engineering rPE) Percent Selactad Subtotal (A) 2% Subtotal (B) 20% Subtotal (C) 7% 3% 15% 15% Subtotal Costa $4,900,000(A) 98,000 $4,998,000(B) 999 ,600 $5,997 ,S00(C) 419 ,800 $6 ,417 ,400 192,500 962,600 $7,572,500 1,135,900 284 ,000 $1 ,419 ,900 COOT PE ... 5 -14% of Cl 14% 1,060,200 265 ,000 PE Indirects (25% of COOT PE) Entity PE (if applicable) ..... Consultant PE (if applicable) Right of Way 88l,000 TOTAL COST AS OF DEC. 1995 WHEN ENR NAT. CCI STOUD AT 5524 i11 , 199,600 Certification of Cost Estimate (Cor,str, ,ct:on project costs must te certified by a registered professional engineer in the State or Cr,iorado .) Charles R. Esterly (Name -Pnnt) certify that I have prepared/approved the above cost estimate. Sff}~R:~~ 17787 Colorado P.E. # 12.1zi..11s 3 .0 .e 29.0' 29.0' EXISTING SECTION OF BRIDGE AT S. BROADWAY AND HAMPDEN (U .S.285) Concrete Handrail I J b b (0 (0 41.0' .0 ' 41 .0 ' PROPOSED SECTION OF BRIDGE AT S. BROADWAY AND HAMPDEN (U.S.285) - Resolution i Jl29J,._ Seri es of 1994 A RESOL UTION I N SUPPORT OF THE CON TINUED DESIGN AND CONS TRUCTIO N OF THE US 265 t BR OADUA Y BRIDGE IN ENG LEW OOD COLORADO . Whereas the City of En ?lewood t,as bl?en an acti ·.1e pa rt icipant in t he planning of t ranspor tati o n need s in E ngleuood and the Denve r Metrop ol ica.n P.eg1on , and; Whereas the US 285 /Broadwai bridge proj~ct was i ncluded in the 1992-1996 Transportation lmp·r,vement Plan <TIF J as required an d identified b:,, the Denver Regional Council of Governments <DRCOG> ond tha Colorado D i vi s ion of Transport•tion <COOT), a nd: \.lhereas as a :-es1.d t of ne1.1 f~deral legislation c:-1a>i't1ng the lnte rmo da I S u rfa ce Tr an sp ortation Efficienc y Act <!ST EA ). the project was mo v e o into the 1995-2000 T I P a cc ordin~ to pri o rity ra nking b y the ORCOG tra n 3 port ation department in the Safety pr oject cat eg ory , a nd : Uhereas the US 2S5 i Broad1.1ay brid;e h~s continued a s a I isted project in t he T i ? unti I recent !y , and : Whereas the En ~le1.1ood Dow nto1.1 n De ~elopment Auth~rit~ <ED DAl was created b~ th• City o ! En glewood f or p:-c~ot1on and enh~ncement of busi~es~e~ within it 's statuatory district, and ; Whereas the E DDA district in c l udes the Englew ood Central 6usiness District are~ served by the US 265/B:-o~dwa1/ b :-id~~. and ; Whereas t ~e EDD~ Eoard of Directors ack~:wled:es th~ long ter m benefit to tt 's d1st:-ic• of the timely c~nstr ~1~t :on or the US 2851Broad1.1eoy b:-id;e p:-oject. No1.1, there~o:e . be 1t resolved by th@ Eoeord or [·1:acto:s o r the Englewood Dcw~town [1evelopment Authority t~at we s~~po:-~ the cons·.r,Jt::tion of the u:: 265/Br,:,eoduay bridge as o:-1~ineol I:, proposed in the 1995-2000 T I F ;nd we strongly urie the re-1n cl~s1on o : the project in th~ p!a~. Adop:~d and appr c~ed th:3 lltn cay /1 City of Englewood PUBLI C WORKS DEPARTMENT ----------------------------------·-·-- Engineering Setvlc:N Slreels Mairtonance P,wks Traffic January 5, 1995 Spence r Montgomery Denve r Regional Council of Governments 2480 West 26th Avenue, Suite 200B Denver, Colorado 80211 Dear Spencer : Fleet Maontonance Builclng Malnlennnco 3'100 S. Elall Street Englewood, Caaado 801 10-2J04 Phone (3031 762-2500 FAX (3031 7119-1125 The City of Englewood TIP application for SH 28 5/Drondway Inte rchange identifies the project type as "Capacity anJ Accessibility Improvements". This project is eligib le for thi s ca tegory per the 1dopted "'Policy on Transportation Improvement Program Preparation". This interchange is identified in Figure 8 of the 2015 Interim RTP . Additional ly, thi s i··--rc~an re is on the DRCOG 199;.:002 TIP Priority Li st. As DRCOG is aware , thi s project was previously adopted in the 1993-1995 TIP (#93-196). Unfonunately . a funding source was not identified and the project was removed from the TIP. COOT has st:ited that thi s project was in the wrong proje ct type . Thi s project is n top pri ority for the Ci ty of Englewood. We do not wan t to risk exclusion from the TIP due to appl ying in the \\Tong project type . For thi s reason, we have included forms 3B and JC fo r project type s 4R and Operational respectively. These fonns cont:iin all the infonnati on we currently have fo r the interchange . Thank you for your assistance with the project application. Please call me at 762-2506 with an y co mments or questions. lir:l~~ Davi d Henderson, Special Projects Coordina tor Publi c Works Departme nt DRCOO 1117-2002 TIMSiijkli1llllol1 l,lffl1111P1"''°"'',.ll'"met,.ntnt Program ~Form38 PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA FORM RESURFACING, RECONSTRUCTION, REHABILITATION AND RESTORATION PROJECTS Project Name · SH 285/Bmadway lolefl:hange Highway 1B and Bridge PTgjects· Current Volumes (1995): __ -"J0-.5..,00..,._ __ _ Average Week Day Traffic (ramp volumes for interchange projects) (Bridge : AwDT on bridge) Pavement/Bridge Index: • see note (Overall Pavement Index for roadways from DRCOG) (Bridge Sufficiency Index for '>ridges from DRCOG) Icansrt 48 Prniects : Is the project in the Transit Oevelopment Program ()'es/no,,.l-1.1N/u::A.__ _____ _ Notes : Information not avaif:hk! at time of aooltcation This form suoolled for reasons state<.1...in attached DllCOG 1917.-Z Tnnepoftatlol, lmprov-,t f'n,gnm ~ldatlonl'onn3C PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA FORM HIGHWAY AND TRANSIT OPERATIONAL PROJECTS Pmject Name: SH 285/Broadway Interchange ~9!l5) Yolumos {highway projects)· Peak Hour 2 550 Eastbound 112195 -PM) least or south bound) Peak Hour. 3 400 'Me•lllound 112/95 -PM (west or north bound) Capacity (DRCOG): ________ _ Weekday Traffic Count ___ 7u0,.OOO..,..,_ __ _ Date of Count -'1_.21 .. 9,,_5 ________ _ Vehicle Hours of Travel Saved :_• _..ses..,._n,..o,.te.._ ___ ___.(pmvide procedure and calculabons; see worksheet in Appen dix F) Accident (3 vcac;) (highway projects) {from PRCOG)· Fatt.: Accidents: __ ~~----Property Damage Only_·-~----------- Injury Accid9nts :____].._ ___ _ r-.an sit Pro jects · Is the project in the Transij Development Program (yes/no):_~N=/~A~- Notes · • Not availible at ti me of aoolication This foan suoolied far reasons stated in attached letter SJ( -z.r~ / EaoA1>1,t1111y (s~rw, 1211r Analyst _________ nmc Period Analy,.at : .J2J.__ Arn lype : l!fCBD □ Otbtt i-,:Pro:.:..::!iect:::::,:,:N:::•·.:.:= ============:....::::City/Slalo : VOLUME ANO GEOMETRICS NIS STitEIIT NORTII LOST TIME PER PHASE (scc.t O IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM : ··-2.Lann. ........ l. ~ bf lline ,,,_,.(l'l<G)-.. .., __ 5. .... (ptrpicalOfp,lliriad) 7.Bu:alllllJpl I 415 EB lOTAL TRAfl-JC AND ROADWAY CONDmONS Approach Gndc (%) 0 Mi-Pl:&-'-- % HV 1-y-.,-N~.,c, --N-.--t e .... (NJ PHF Conf. Pcds.. {J>«Whr) Ne --z 2 , . ttz J le N b 1---s_a __ 2._'--2-'--------'--6~_·_'?_5'_.._ ___ __.__N' _ _,_ __ ...... ~ Gndc • up, -down IN: v~h. w1 lh mort lhari 4 wheels N •. pkg.. ln:&nCUVcnlhr PHASING 0 I A G R A M N., buses stopping/hr PHF peak-hour factor Conf. Pcds .: Conflicting pcds/hr Timinc 'G • 51 Y +AR ,. G • VZ G • l't G • Y +AR "' 4 Y • AR • 4 Y + AR = Y +AR • Ptcumcd or Actuated __} Protec1cJ 1ums Pcrm 1ucd turns F,gwrl' 9-14. Input Moduli' Worlshrrl. G • Mm. Timing : min. green for pedestrian cross ing Arr. Type : Type 1-6, or P -----1 G • Y +AR • Y +AR • ________ lime Pmod Analyzed : -PM Alea Type: lll'CBD O Other Project No.: __ City/State : VOLUME AND GEOMElll.lCS I t.r2..1r2. I /05 HISSTR.EET ,o \.__ I S8 TOTAL 310 .JI'--~, WBTOTA.L 2.qo l?ZO ,? NORnl LOST TIME PER PHASE(,cc_)cD IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM · i=---~ 2~s-.Jn. 5""''7 .. _.,_ ----Jr-- ._,._(l'KGJlocationo \ I ~:::..-==-I I ff I I 1440 I -7Bt,.alle,pa NBTOTAL w 1---------=------l TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDmONS Adj .Pq.UII< % HV f----'-----i'-----l Pc:dcltri:ui Button Arr. Y or N Min. Tinung .l)pc YorN N .. WI\ 0 0 NB 2. SD 2. 2. G~: + up, -down HV: vch. with more UW1 4 whcc:13 N.c pkg. maneuv<n/h, PHASING D I A i t G -R A ~ ---, M T"""" G • 5 1 G• 2. 2. Y + .\R • V + AR • Pmnnc:ri or Actumd __J Protcckd rums 10 /'/ N, buses stoppi ng/tv' Min. Tin .. ng : mm . &r«n for PHF · pca.k-how-rr.tor pedestrian crossing Conf.Pcds.:Con.1.ctingpcd.s_.ilu-_____ A_rr_.Typc-'-'--'-Tyc.c.p<_l•_6._o_r_P ___ ---I 't t G• IL,. G • Y •AR ,. V •AR • ' Pc:nmttcd !urns I G • Y +AR • G• G• G • Y tAR • Y +AR .. Y +AR ,. Pc:datnan Cycle Length __ 5« -U t. 2..8 S-/ ~J?..<9A't,,·-0r-,. 'r' tN - \_ 105 ~ lo 3 575 9400 --=--=======~==~~~=~=======~11~!::~'l~ '2.550 -;> \O~ 32S~ )- a: 1 p < ~ {'!J 0 ir-~i r '2.Lj70 ___,,, Lawerence Tilong DRCOG Picas,, sup:,ly 2005 Peak bour volumes and Capadcy for the followiug 3 proposed TIP proje.t 3;,plications. l) US-285/Broadway lnte.cbangc ~ PM Peak Hour 2315 south bound PM Peak Hour 1800 nonh bound Weekday Traffic Count 37,000 12-7-95 2)US-285 MediDJ1S Broadway to Gilpin PM Peak Hour 2250 east bound PM Peak Hour 3000 w~st bound Weekday Traffic Count 61,000 1995 3)2700-3200 South Broadway PM Peak Hour t I 50 south bound PM Peak Hour I 300 nonh bound Weekday Traffic Count 35 .000 12-7 -95 David Henderson City offnglewood Public Works 762-2506 FAX 789-1 125 l.!S:lli PM Peak Hour 2550 east bound PM Peak Hour 3400 west bound Weekday Traffic Count 70.000 12-7-95 DRCOG 1117-21112 Tra1-,or..io., 11npro__. ""'1!ram ~ldall1111Fom,2 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Pago 1 (One form per pro/ectJ r roject Desctiption Project Name · Bjq Dry Creek Trail SH 85 West Pbuo Ill P~ Type (see Table 2 Appendix C)· Bjcycie And Pedtlibian P[llject:; TIP Status (new or resubmit);.. ___fhaU_lll Sponsor. Englewood Co-Sponsors(s): Littleton & South Suburban Park & Rl!!.'e,l!tion Djsmct Sponsor ID# (optional): NIA Project Location : County · Arapahoe City · E~n..,g.,lewood=-~iwD~d~L~iW~o~to~o~----------- e.att.L Financial lnformatJon ($1 ,000) Year Federal CDOT Local/RTO Total Activities To Be Performe<I By Year _1_ ...lllL_ --___n__ j§J__ Construction of wioderro(jfe Crossing final design & ROW acauisition --2.._ ...lli___ ----~2~=----1.Q2ll -3.__ ---- Totals ~ __ _ 237 ua;, Prior Expenses :~($1,000) (d es ign , ROW, construction) Match Source Categories (CDOT/Local/RTD/Other) Construction does not inc lude prior expense ) Local -City qf Enclewood · Citv of Littleton South S·1burbao Park and Recreation District Notes (i nclude description of prior expenses and other com,1 1t:nts} ~~·~ting SIIP pro ject #STEM81Q..003 terminates at Santa Ee with a temporary connection to the Platte Riv er trail sy ,tern Ibis project comoletes the segment to the exir;tiog Platte River Trail Svstem Prior expe nses were oa 1d by the 3 prgj~'lSQ.CS._ roe ROW survey brid"'n desian & trail design C·,mstruction of the Wi nde rmere Crossing is delayed '.Q.Ji91. to coordina te wi th COOT bddae oroiect. - DRCOO 1117.-ZTIWl8p0flatlon lmpn,---""'9111111 Raoomlwllllltlon F-Z, Page 2 PROJECT 'JESCRIPTION FORII Project Name : Big Dry Creek Bike Palh Phase Ill Project Description Lim,ts · South Santa Ee Dr (SH as) 10 the south Platte BIV•c Lenglh (m iles);_.Q.M Description : Construct 10· wide concrete bike trail along Big Dry Creek Trail to cmss under SH 85(S Santa Eo Pr l Construct bridge over tho South Platte River ta connect to the existing Platte River Trail Svstom Construct trailhoad facilitin at Uojon Ave /Platte River and at S Windeanere /Bia Drv Creek Jrallhead lacj!jties will orpyed a bjcydo oarJsing facilities Right:<11-way to be acquired me this prpject fnvimnmental sYCvevs ace comoltte Design Status : FIR Comp!eled l/96 EI\/EIS Status: EA Compli:led l 2lll5 ROW Status : Sur.::e:v Com~ed Start Construcbon : 1998 (year} Open lo lhe Pu clic : ma (year} Cross Section Characteristics Existing After Through Lanes : ___ _ Med"'n Type : (see Tab . 4) Shou i j er Type : (see T,10. 5) ROW Width : (feel) _Q_ Varies _J.[_ Typical Notes : Ibis omtect continues long range coal to connect the South Platte River Trail to the Higbl ine__ Canal Svstem At grade crossina at Santa Ee and Un ion will be de::emohas iz ed The on-streei system from Santa Ee to the river will be dHro ohas12ed Soonsorina agencies comm~ to 1ona ·term ma intenance and operation of this facility llllCOG 1117.acl2Tlwapo, .... llllplO-lll'.....-m .... i lHIIWll ■dc 1form31 PROJECT E' IALUATION CRITERIA FOl'<M BICYCLE ~ID PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS Project Name: Big pry Greets Trail SH as West Phase m Benefit Population and Employment (Bicycle: 3 miles envelope/Pedestrian: 1 mile envelope) (from DRCOG): 1995 : __ ~J4~Z~J~4~0~ _____ 2005 : ___ -""..,,_......._ _______________ 0t ~heck an aoomoriate factors (discuss in notes as aoomoriate)· Bicycle Factors llD Provide access to trans~ □ Complete missing link l!l Complete portion of missing link .-0 Eliminating barriers c-J Provide bicycle parking CJ Provide bicycle actuated signais Pedestrian Factors llD Provide access to transit li!I Complete missing link llD Links orig in s & destinations llD Intersection crossing > 60 feet □ Intersection crossing > 40 feet Iraosportatioo Function (dtSCUSS in notes as aporoprtatel' □ Primarily serves nips to work/school llD Serves other utilitarian trips llD Provides a conne<:tion to transit Roadway pasted Saeed · Pedestrian and Bicycle Accident Data (3 years) Speed li mit:~ __ (nearest 5 miles/hour) Fatalities: ____ Injuries : __ _ Conflict Factors (discuss in notes as aoomoriate l _2.__Number of crossing railroads, roadways , or rapid transitways ~Number of intersections and driveways per 1,000 feet (excluding residential) ___ On-street parking on both sides (one side or both sides) ___ Facility too narrow for current activity level (both bicycles and peds ) (width ) _JL_lnsufficient lig hting (check ii) Notes · This segment of bike path de-emphasizes at grade crossing on South Santa Fe e 111J'-alll~-·•=·•-·,,...,.,,. Ru an mr.tdltlcin l'onn 3Q TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS GENERAL . DATA FORII HiatDrlc PrNervatlon and An:h."WOlogtc■I Projects Transportation ANthetlcs ■no Scenic Projects Water Quallty Project Name: Bjg Pry Cceel< Trail SH 85 West Phase Ill Population of the appticanrs city or county (see table 2 of TIP policy): ~3~0~4K34~-------- Indicate whether the project has a spec,fic transportation function and address a speci!lc transportation impact in relation to :he ITS or is ~ in the proximity of th e ITS. This oroiect has drect relationship to the lntenoodal Transoortation System UIS) Bftduced automo tille_ UK.Af\~1-;a:ss to raiJ and bus transit systems are benefits of the omject The bike oath is a functional comoonent at the ITS and is related in Proximity to a transoocta tio n facility --------- Identify the multiple function enhancement activities served by the project (see the list of eligib'~ actJV1ties in Appendix B). Ibis oroiect is eOoible for enbancement ftmdina under the follow ing auaHtv ioa activity • ·erovisions of Facilities for Pedestrians And BtcYdists • Additionally the PfOtCC1; may be eligible und er • Acouisition of Scenic Easements and Scenic or Histo oc - ENGINEER'S DETAILED ESTIMATE METHOD , 'roject Name : Big Dry Creek Bike Path Phase 3 Road/Facility Name : NIA Route Number. NIA Percent Percent ________ lte~m ________ R_a_n~g~•----'-Se=lected 8id Items (estimate) . Striping ....... . Construction Signing and Traffic Control (Defautt -20%) Mobilization . .. . .................... . (Round up to nexf $1 ,000) (Defautt -7%) 1-5%of 5-25% of 3-10% of TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION BID ITEMS (CBI ) Utilrt1es 1 -3% of CBI Contingencies .. 15%ofCBI TOTAL OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS (Cl) COOT Construction Engineering (CE) . 10-1 5%ofCI CE Indirects (25% of CE) ..... Eci:limi □a01 i;;□gi □eed □g (Ei;;l COOT PE Enhancement Fund Pool .. 5-14%ofCI PE Indirects (25% of COOT PE) . Entity PE (i f applicable) . Consultant PE (if applicab le) Right of Way Subtotal (A) 1% Subtotal (Bl 5% Subtotal (C) 7% 1% 15% 1~'~ Suototal 0% 5% .. TOTA L COST AS OF DEC . 1995 WHEN ENR NAT. CCI STOOD AT 5524 Costs $688 ,600(A) 6,900 $695 ,500(8) 34 ,800 $730 ,300(C) 51100 $781,400 7,800 117,200 $906,400 108 ,800 27,200 $1.16,000 45 ,300 94 ,900 $1 ,182 ,600 Certificatio □ of Cost l;;slimati: (Construction project co st s must be certified by a registered profess ional engineer in the State of Colorado.) Charles R. Esterly (Name -Print) certify that I have prepared/approved the above cost estimate . 17787 Colorado P.E. # ~£~ /2/2;?/~s= Signature Date SEEDING LIMITS .,__I&--~ VARIES SEEDING LIMITS VARIES CLEARING 2 .50' 5.00' 5.00' 2 .50' LIMITS Jo,.....L-.....,::.::.::...::...;...__:_:...:...::._.+-__:_:...:...::._.;.;::;.:...:...::...,_.J&--; CLEARING LIMITS VARIES VARIES PLAN I FINISH GRADE AS SHOWN ON 2 .00::: SLQPE J ; T DA Yl..lGHT LINE. REFER TO PLAN ._. _:.: .. ::: .,,,...:_~-3:,X. f_ EXISTING FINISH GRADE ·:{·;_l_:f .. :.t,::·:::.:t E. •,:::, -SHOULDER. GRADE TO SAME CROSS- SLOPE AS BIKEPATH USING NATIVE MATERIALS. '---------5• THICK CONCRETE BIKEPATH '-------------REMOVE All ORGANIC MATTER AND SCARIFY EXISTING SU8GRAOE TO MINIMUM 6" DEPTH . COMPACT TO MIN . 95:>; PRIOR TO PAVING L--------------SUBGRADE CONCRETE BIKEPATH SECTION C"J<f Littleton City Manager 22SS Wat Berry Aven L-e uu.ton, Cotorado 80165 303 795-3720 FAX 795-3819 January 3, 1996 Mr George Scheu ernstuhl Director, Transporlation Services Denver Regional Council of Govern men ts c 180 We st 26th Ave nue , Suite 200B Denver , CO 8021 1-55S0 RE : Big Dry Creek Trail -Phase Ill TIP A1 ,11lir:1tio11 Mr Scheuemstuhl The City of Linleton strongly suppons the an ache d Citv oi Englew oo d application for the third phase ofcon structior, of the Bi g Dry Cre ek Trai l \\'e lo ok forward !o the contin uati on of our pa r1nership with the Ci ty of En glewood and the Sou th Su bu rb an Park and Re creation Di stri ct on this project The Big Dry Creek Trail will provide a safe bicycl e and pede strian con necti on bel\\een our nonheast neighborhood and the Arapahoe Greenway Trail \\"e appla ud the Tran spo rlation Improv ement Program which makes significant and subs tantial proJeC tS lik e this possible .. South Suburban Park and Recreation District 6631 South University Boulevard Littleton, Color~do 80121 Administrativ,, Ol!ice (3<'3) 798-5131 Fax (3031 79!1-3030 January 3. 1996 Denver Regional Council of Governments Attn . Mr George Scheuemstuhl Director ofTransponation Services 24 80 W 26th Ave . Suite 200 B Denver. CO 80 2 11-5580 In .Rt: Big Dry Crttk Bike Path -Phast 3 1997-2000 TIP Recommendati on Form Submilltd by City or En21ewood Dear George Board of Directors JamH A. Taylor· Chairman GOfdon Mllllkan Charles E:. 3lroh Roberta F. GIiiis James J . Ryan Ill Executive Direc to r Dav id A.. Loren, South Suburban Park and Recreation Di strict is a co-sponsor of the Big Dry Creek Bike Path System and gives its suppon for the project as submitted in the Cit)· of En glewood 's application for that segment between Santa Fe Drive and the So uth Platte River Plea se direct any questions regarding o ur age ncy to me at 795-653 1. e,'1 112 H Wm W oodc(lck . Manager Planning & Construction Dept cc Da,id Henderso n. City of Englewood Da,id Flaig . City of Littlet on b*' 101 Exc 0 ,°" ;_~(_,,_\ Twice Aw arded the Natlonal Go ld _--....... in Par k and Recreation Management ' 1( OllCOO 1ffl-ZOO:l TranepNlallon lm~t .....,_ «-clldlon Form 2 PROJECT IOENTIFICATION Page 1 (One ram, per profe<,1) Project Dewiptlon Project Name · s Broadway Widening & Medians Project Type (see Table 2 AppendlY q-Highway -Reconstruction Restoration and Rehabilitation TIP Status (new or rnsubmij):..llm_ ______ _ Sponsor. City of EngleWood Co-Sponsors(s,,.l·...,N_,./cA _____ _ Sponsor IOI (optlonall:JUA_ ____ _ Project Location : Coont-r Arapahoe City ~· ~E.,ng,.,!ewcx,.,......,d._ ______ _ Finan ci al Information (S1 ,oon1 Federal COOT Local/RTO Total Activities To Be Performed By Year _1_ --2&__ ....§.1_ ___ ~ Preliminary Ena ineerina _2!18_ Utilities And Construction -3._ ---- Totals ....2...1.N_ 545 .l..lli Pnor Expenses :_Q__($1 ,000) (desig n, ROW, co nstruction) Match Source Categori"s (COOT/Local/RTO/Olher) does not include prior expense ) Notes (include description of pri or expenses ond other comments) ilQ.Year chasing adeauate for oro1ect with mi nor enviro~~------------------------ - IIRCOG 1"7.-Z T111, .......... lmpl'D,-i "'°flram RacoiN.•Mlalloc. Form 2, Page Z PROJECT' DESCRIPTION FORM Project Name · s Brpadway Wldoolng & Medjans eaiu Project Description Limits • SH 285 to Yal/l Length (,:iiles)-1.ll...__ Description : Yflden Bma¢«s·t to ac;corno,odab: medians and mn tum oockots at iotcrJoctioos Rerconstrud and oyerlay as required for widen ing and oavement rehabilitation Install irrigation svscem and Dlantina i'l :oedlans Existi ng cooc.rete sidc:nnlk and curb to be removedtmtocatod to ar;c;ommodate widen in g Envimnmental studin Design and construction are included as oart of this oro1ect No R O W acau isitio n Design Status : 1ggz Cron Section Charxteristlcs Existing After EA/E IS Status . J99Z Through Lanes : _A__ _A__ ROW Status : Med ian Type : Sta rt Construction : 1998 lvear) (see Tab . 4) _.1_ _L_ Open to the Pub lic-199 9 (year) Should er Type : I (see Tab . 5) _Q__ _Q__ ROW Width . (feet) ..1.QO__ ..1.QO__ Notes · Tots oroiect brin gs pavement condjtjoo of S Brnadwav to good category Median s will separate north/south traffic and orovide left tum oockets for mcceased safety of S Broadway comdor DIICOO 1117.ao2 Trwportallclll lll•oww1•1t ,....,. "--Mlallon '-• PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA FORM RESURFACING, RECONSTRUCTION, REHABILITATION AND RESTORATION PROJECTS Project Name · s Broadway \Mdeoioq & Medians Hjghway ◄B and Brjdge P~ Current Volumes (1995,..)·~3._5,..ooo....._________ Average Week Day Traffic (ramp volumes for interchange projects ) (Bridge : AwDT on bridge ) PavemenVBridge Index· 52 2 (Overall Pavement Inde x for roadways fro m DRCOG) (Bridge Sufficiency Index for bridges from DRCOG ) Is the project in the Transrt Developmant Program (yes/no):...,.,,_ ___________ _ Notes: This seoemeot of South f i>adwav provides a link between downtown Peover and State Hi9 hwaL 75 soulh of SH 285/Broadway 1.,.,t..,er:ct,a...,,.,_n.,.g,.e ___________________ _ - ENOIN&R'S DETAILED ESTIMATE METHOD Project Name : S. Broadway Widening and Medians Road/Facility Name : ~outh Broadway Route Number: Hwy. 75 Bid Items (estimate) Striping Item Construction Signing and Traffic Control (Default -20%) Mobilization ......... .. .................... . (Round up to next $1 ,000) (Default -7%) Percent R11nge 1-5%of 5 -25% of 3 -1 0%of Percent Selected Subtotal (A) 5% Subtotal (B) 20% Subtotal (C) 7% Costs $1 ,280 ,000(A) 64,000 $1 ,344 ,000(B) 268,800 $1 ,612 ,SOO(C) 112 ,900 TOTAL COST OF CONSTR :;...UC"-·-'110"--'N..::B.c.:IDccl-'-TE~M--'S::....,c(Cc.:B;.;,l)'--------.:.$1'-', 7:..:2:..:5.:.c, 7..:.00=--- Utillties ... 1-3%of 3% 51 ,800 CBI Conting encies 15%ofCBI 15% 258,900 TOTAL OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS (Cl) $2,036 ,400 COOT Construction E~gineering (CE) 10-15% of 15% 305 ,500 Cl CE Indirects (25% of CE) ... 76 ,400 Subtotal $ 381 ,900 ecelimi □ao,: E □gi □ee □□g (EEl CDOTPE ..... 5 -14% of Cl 12% 244,400 PE Indirects (2 5% of COOT PE ) . 61 ,100 E~tity PE (if ai:,plicab le) . Consultant PE (if applicable) . TOTAL COST AS OF DEC . 1995 'NH EN ENR NAT . CCI STOOD AT 5524 $2,723,800 Certification of Cost Estimate (Construction project costs must be certified by a rogistered professional engineer in the State of Colo rado .) Charles R. Esterly (Name -Print) 17787 Colorado P.E. # certify tha t I have prepared/~roved the above cost estimate . Si~ h~:,,..,qc__ __ _Ll&,c:;,µJ:ca~,:;_e-1---l-'1~s=,___~ MEDIAN CBQSS-SECJION ' PLANTER CROSS::SfCIIQN _J SOUTH BROADWAY WOENING -TYPICAL 600' BLOCK - PLANTER DETAIL --~·•l'STtN IIIICOG 1117..-:l Tnl........._ Improvement Program Rac:olnn I ~lo111n l"llfffl 1 PROJECT IDENTlFICATION Page 1 (One lbml per project} Project Description Project Name · 3000 -J600 w BtlltYlew Ave $ldnta4kA Project Type (see Table 2 Appendix C)· Bjcycie w,d f'ldlstrian Prr' __________ _ TIP Status (new or resubmit):_..,N..,ewn... _____ _ Sponsor. __ QlullfnglewQod ..;o-Sponsors(s): ~N-tA~----- Sponsor ID# (opllonol\:. ,~,.,"'A._ _____ _ Prcject Location : County : Arapahoe City : _ _.E .. n.,.g.,.lew ...... gcd..,._ _________ _ PmL Financial lnforrroation ($1,000) Year Federal COOT LOC'1!1/RTO Total Aclivitie-o To Be Performed By Year _j__ ...u__ ..li.__ Pmlimioiln• Engineering ...11 '--Construction Totals ~-__ _ 26 ..J 2]_ Fn<ir E.xpenses :_Q__(Sl ,000) (design , ROW, construction) Match Source (:ategories (CDOT /Local/RTO/Other ' does not includP. prior expense ) Notes (i nclude description of prior ex~nse~ and o!her comments) .IwQ..year ceas ing adeouate for cro1ect with minor env ironmen ta l and utility concerns - IIIICOG 1117-2002T ....... IIIIOi'olM,p.ow-l',ogram Rac•-Mllllon l'offll 2, Page 2 PROJECTDESCRIPTIONFORlt Project Name· 3000 -3600 w BtlleYilw Ave SjdewaJks em.a: Project Description Limits : s Fodera! Blvd to s Lowen St Length (miles): . .....,.._ _____ _ Description · lamnation of 5' wide sjdewalk aklng the north sjda of w Beflovillw Ave Sidewalk k)cation anticipated at back. of ,.xistina curb Installation of handAP ramps at aJrfJ returns with associated incidental wod< incb.idiog cekx:atioo of siQnu traffic !UQnal!I and curb cut reconsto,ction Posian Envimnmeotal and constryction am ioduded as oart of this prpiect No BOW acqy;s;tion ii required Design S\atus: 1997 Cross Section Ch1r1ct1rtstlcs Existing After EA/EIS Status: 1997 Through Lanes :_4__ ROW Status: NIA Mediar, Tn•?: Start Construction: ]998 (see Tab . 4) ~ Open to the Public: 1998 (year} Shoulder Type: (see Tab . 5) _o_ ..IL_ ROW Width : (feet) _so:__ _so:__ Notes · Pedestrians use the existing dirt/gravel surface as a walkway This omiect orovides accessibility for wheek:hairs and ties into existing sidewalks at ~H 88 <Eederal Blvd l Ena\eWood commits to lonsi:..te.r.m. maintenance and operation of this facility DIICOQ 11174002 ~ -=-11 l'logNm R-........ Fonn3E PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA FORM BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS Pro;ect Name:.....JllOQ..-36IJO W Belleview Ave Sjdowalks Benefit Population and Employment (Bicycle : 3 mites enwtope/Pedestrian : 1 mile envelope) (from DRCOG): 1995: ___ _...20....,64,.5,._ ___ 2005 : ___ _.2_.3.,5..,JcwBc.... __ Other Use Base : _______ _ Cbeck an aoorooriate factors (discuss in notes as appropriate)· Bicycle Factors □ Provide access to transrt □ Complete missing link □ Complete portion of missing link □ Eiiminating ban iers □ Provide bicycle parking □ Provide bicycle actuated signals Pedestrian Factors !iii Provide access to transrt !iii C'lmplete missing link I!!! Links orig ins & destinations □ Intersection crossing > 60 feet !iii Intersection crossing > 40 feet Transoortatian Function {discuss in notes as aoomoriate)· □ Primari!J serves trips to WO<k/school !iii Serves other utilitarian trips !iii Provides a connection to transit RQadway Pasted Speed · Pedes, ian and Bicycle Accident Data (3 years) Speed limit_~35~_(nearest 5 miles/hour) Fatalities . ____ Injuries : __ _ Gonflict Factors (dil'Cl 1sli'l..QQfgs as aoorooriate.} ....z...__Number of crossing railroads . roadways , or rapid transitways ..1..__Number of intersections and driveways per 1,000 feet (excluding residential ) ___ On-street parking on both sides (one side or both sides) ___ Facili ty too narrow for current activity level (both bicycles and peds) (width ) ___ Insufficient lighcing (check if) Notes : BIO bus stoos are located along this segment Commercial shoooiog and religious facil ity ar;l; in proxim ity to the project ORCOG 1117..aGa l'nlliapllltallol1 lfflprovet.-t Program RKofflmlnd.._, Form 30 TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS GENERAL DATA FORM Historic Prnervatlon and An:haeologlcal Projecta Tnineportatlon Aesthetlce and Scenic Projects Wate• Quality Project Name · 3000 -3600 w Belleview Av• Sidewalls• Population of the applicant's city or ~oi.rty (see table 2 of TIP policy,.)~30L4~34~--------- Indicate whether the project has a specific transportation function and address a specific transportation impact ;n relation to the ITS or is rt in the proximity of the ITS . lb.ts oroied has a direct cclatiooshio to the intermodal transoortatioo svstem OTS l Reduced~ use and access to bus transit svstems ar~...w!..Jtli•J omiect Ibis Qedestrian system is related in omximity to a traosoortation facility Identify the multiple function enhancement activities served by the project (see the list of eligible activities in Appendix B). This omteci is eligible for enhancement funding under the fo!towina aualified activity • • Provisi9os of Facilities for Pedestrians and Bicvcl ists • - - Project Name : 3000-3600 W . BeUeviiM' Siclewalb Road/FaclHty Name: Belleview Ave . Route Number: SH 88 Percent Percent Item Ra!!j! Selected Costs Bid Items (estimate) . Subtotal $ 63,200(A) Striping ........... ..................... 1-5%of (A) 1% 600 Subtotal i 63,800(8) Construction Signing and Traffic Control 5-25%of (B) 20% 12,800 (Default -20%) Subtotal $ 76 ,600(C) Mobilization 3-1 0%of (C) 7% 5,400 (Round up to next $1 ,000) (Default -7%) TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION BID ITEMS (CBI ) $82,000 E!U!.11 A!.l.!IU □t llams Utilil,es .......... .................. 1-3%ofCBI 1% 800 Contingencies ................................. 15% of CBI 15% 12,300 TOTAL OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS (Cl) $95,1 00 COOT Construction Engineering (CE) 10-15%ofCI 15% 14,300 CE Indirects (25% of CE) . 3 ,600 Subtotal $17,900 er.alimiaa~ Eagiaeedag (EEl CDOTPE Enhancement Fund Pool ... 5 -14% of Cl 0% PE Indirects (25% of COOT PE) .... E11tity PE (if applicable) ... Consultant PE (if applicable) . 15% .. 14 ,300 TOTAL COST AS OF DEC . 1995 WHEN ENR NAT. CCI STOOD AT 5524 $127 ,300 Certificat ioa of Cost Estimate (Construction project costs must be certified by a registered professional engineer in the State of Colorado.) Char1es R. Ester1y (Name -Print/ certify that I have prepared/aµproved the above co st estimate . ~~ Signature 17787, Colorado P.E. # 12-/zz./-?s Date r 40' 40' ~ 5' 24'-0' 24'--0' ~~:1 ~~-~~--4----.....::::....-=---.-..! r: 2'-6' 2'-6' i 1 : ---"'_02=,F='-_. r .02/Ft. w ~~:!:---------1· _'---t..------------ Proposed 6' Concrete Sidewalk i ,O I IC Ii ' s:i Curb & Gutt.:r WEST BELLEVIEW AVENUE IIIICOG 1111-aoa1'nlMpolllllonllnf-..-nll'nlgnm 1'1101 dlll1n~'-1 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Page 1 (Onebmper,,,,,;,,ct) fllil Project Description Project Name · 3000 • 3400 $ Unjyffljty Blvd Sidewllka Project Type (see Table 2 Appendix Cl · Bicycio and pfldestrjan Pmiects TIP Status (new or resubm~):._..,New=------ Sponsoc City of Engl@wOOd Co-Sponsors(s): _.N/,..Ac,.... ____ _ Sponsor ID# (opllonal):.~NlucA~----- Project Location : County : Arapanoe City :_..1E.i.o .. a .. 1ew .... ooo ...... _________ _ P.al1.L Financial Information ($1,000) Year Federa l COOT LncaVRTD Totc ' Activities To Be Perl'o rmed By Year .J_ ...12.__ ....15._ fm1irninary Enaineeri na & Envimornontal ...2..__ .JM....__ ---__ 24~--...ill_ ~:i.o,~•ticruwic'"tioo.,u.n _____ _ Totals -1ll!i_ __ _ 27 ...1JJ..__ Prior Expenses:_a__cs1 .ooo ) (design , ROW, construction ) Match Source Ca~,gori es (CDOT/LccaVRTD/Other) does not include p . .or expense) Notes (include descriotion of prior expenses and other comments) Two year phasing adequate for oroiect witb....mi.ru2Lenvironmental and utility conce rns - DIICOCJ 1117..-Z Tranapo,tallDII 111111,,. .. ..,l'll"'•,.--nlll l'rogn.m ~Fonn2, ..... 2 PROJECT DESCF«PTION FORM p,.,ject Name: 3000 -3400 S YoiYmil:t Btyd Sklowalk• 2ill1.3: Proj<,ct Description Limits: 440' N of Dartmouth 1g SH 285 Length (miles):_....._ _____ _ Description · lostaUation of 5' widui~ walk along Ibo wost skle o1 s UniYo[Jjly 81Yd Sl<lo:«•lk k,c;aljon anticipated at back of AXistina Q.lrb Installation of handic.aP carom at cum [&hJms with oHcx;latad incidental worts including r:ek;>C;ation_gf_J;,mm traffic signals and curb cut remnstructioo Ptl!Q1 1._ Envtrno;nental and coostructJon are in'iluded as part of this omN!Ct No BOW acauilitton is mauk:Jtd Des, , Status : 1Sl!Z c,.,_. Soctlon Characterlattcs Existing After EA/1::IS Status: llil!Z Through Lanes:__!___ ~ ROW Status: Median f ype : Start Construction : ]998 (year) (see .. ab. 4) ....N/A_ .NIA,_ Open to the Public: llil!B ,~earl Shoulder Type : (see Tab. 5) __o__ _r_ ROW Width: (feet ) ...JI[__ .JI[__ Notes~existinc diCVaravel surface as a walkway Ibis oroiect omvldes accessibditv _ for wheelchairs and ties into e:ristma sidewalks at SH 285 Enalewood commits to Iona-term ma,oteoaoce ... and ooera hon of this facilitv DRCOQ 1ffl-2002Tlanlpo,tlillOllll!p,vw_ll.....,...11 fleCGII I U.111 n"-:IE PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA FORM BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS Project Name : 3000 -3400 S. Univel'9ity Blvd . Sidewalks. ___________ _ Benefil Population and Employment (Bicycle : 3 miles envelope/Pedestrian : 1 mile envelo pe) (from ORCOG): 1995: ___ ~2..,6..,0,u1..,.8 ___ 2005 : ___ ..,26.._..76,.8._ __ 0ther Use Base : ______ _ Q)eck all appropriate fgtprs {discuu In notes as appro r Bicycle Factors □ Provide access to transit □ Complete missing link □ Complete portion of rrissing link □ Eliminating barriers □ Provide bicycle parl<ing □ Provide bicycle actuated signals 11: Pedestrian Factors ll!l Provide accr,ss t,--ansit ll!l Complt,!8 missing link ll!l Links origins & destinations □ lnte<section crossing > 60 feet ll!l ln-.:tion crossing > 40 feel Iransoortatioo Euor;tioo (discuss in notes as acpmpriate)· □ Primarily serves trips lo wor1</school lil Serves other utilitarian trips ll!l Provides a connection to transit Roadway Pasted Speed · Pedestrian ond Bicycle Accident Data (3 years) Speed li mit_~J~S __ (nearesl 5 miles/hour) Fatalities : ____ Injuries : __ _ Conflict Factors (d iscuss in notes as aooroonate > ~ __ Number of crossing railroads, roadways , o, rapid transitways ..1...__Number of intersections and driveways per 1,000 feel (excluding residential) ___ On-slreel parking on both sides (one side or both sides) ___ Facility too narrow !or current activity level (both bicycles and peds) (widlh) .i...__lnsufficienl lighti ng (check if) Notes : RID bus stocs are located alooa th is segment Two rel igious faci1ities are adjacent to the oroiect DltCOG 1ffl-111121'-,attallalllmpnl-tp...,_ ""-nnioudatlon l'onn 30 TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS GENERAL DATA FORM Hlatorlc PTNefVltlon and An:hNologlc■I Prajecta Tr■napol1allon Anthetlc■ and Sc■nlc Project■ Wat.r Qu■llty Project Name · 3000 • 3400 S UniyJpjty Btvd $&4WIJl<A Population of the applicant's city or C<l 'inty (see !able 2 ofTIP pollcy~)·~30-◄~-H~-------- Indicate whether the project has a specific transportation function and address a specific transportation impact in relation to the ITS or 19 It in the proximity of the ITS . ~ has a direct reiationl/Jjp IP Ibo lntermoctlJ transportation system III$ > Reduced automobile use and access to bus transn svsteros am benefits of thls oroicct This oedestrian system 1$ related in moxtmitv ta a transportation facility Identify the multiple function enhancement activities served by the project (see the list of eligible activities in Append ix Bl . This project is elig ible for enhancement funding under the following qualified activity · • PJPYisklns of Fa cili ties for Pede • ians and Bk;vclists • Project Name: 3000-3400 S. Uni-.;ty Sidewalks Road/Facility Name: South University Blvd Route Number: SH 17 Bid Items (estimate} Striping Item C ,nstruction Signing and Traffic Control (Default• 20%} Mobilization .............................................. . (Round up to next $1,000} (Default• 7%} Pan:ent Range 1-5%of 5 • 25% of 3-10%of TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION BID ITEMS (CBI} force Account Items Utilities ..... . ContingAncies ..... 1-3% of CBI 15 % of CBI Percent Selected Subtotal (A} 1% Subtotal (B} 20% Costs $65,800(A) 700 $ 66,500(8) 13,300 Subtotal $ 79 ,SOO(C} (C} 7% 5 ,600 1% 15% $ 85.400 900 12.800 _T .... O_T_A...c.L...c.O_F .... C'-'O __ N....cS_TR_u .... c_T_IO_N_IT_E_M_S~(_C~I} ____________ $'-,.99 , 100 COOT Construction Eng ineering (CE} ..... . 10-15'/oofCI CE Indirects (25% of CE} .................. . fililiroiaa,y Engineering CPE} COOT PE Enh,.ncement Fund Pool 5 • 14% .:,f Cl PE Indirects (.:5% of COOT PE} Entity PE (if applicable} ...... . Consultant PE (i f applicable} ........................ . 15% 14 .900 3 ,700 Subtotal $ 18 ,60' 0% 15 14,900 TOTAL COST AS OF DEC . 1995 WHEN ENR NAT . CCI STOOD AT 5524 $132,600 Certjjjcatjon of Cost Estjmate (Construction project costs must be certified by a registered professional enginee r in the State of Colorado.} Charles R. Esterly , (Name • Print) certify that I have prepared/approved :he above cost estimate . 17787 , Colo rado P.E. # ~~~ 12./zz/~;r Signature Date i 40' I 40' T I ~ ii ;:;t !'I ~~ ~ ~,~ --_f, ---.-:0~:__ ~'"""\------------ 6" Concrete 5' 24'-0" 24'-0' 2·-e· I a:t Curb & Gutter Sidewalk SOUTH UNIVERSITY DIICOG 1117-all: 1111..-,nt Program 11111-dll■llllln r -1 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Page 1 /On• fonn,,., PfOiect) flllU: Project Desa1ption Project Name:..stues ModiaQl::flmadWJlv tg GUpjn Project Type (see Table 2 Appendix c,~l·""Saft....,..,tv,..pmjld5..,.·..,..._ _____________ _ TIP Status (r.w or resubm~).:_ ~H-ow-_____ _ Sponsor. Ctty or EnglowQOd Sponsor IOI (optional).:_ ,..Nl..,A~--- Project Location : County · A@Oahao Financial Information ($1 ,000) Yea r Federal COOT Local/RTO Total ..1Z8__ ...2__ ...1.33I.._ ---_,.,334c,_ __ Co-Sponsors(s,,.l·_,.N/.,A._ ___ _ City · Engle:«Qod Activities To Be Performed By Year Tola ls _1AN_ __ _ 370 ~ • · sot include pri or expense) Prior Expense,:.J..5.000..._($1,000) (design , ROW, construction) Match Source Categories (C DOT/LocaVRTDIOther) Notes (inciude description of prior expenses and other comments} Two year phasing adequate ~ Witb .minor envimnmeotal concpms COOT and Eoak:wood shared eoualtv in a $30 ODO Traffi c Feas ibil itv Study in 1992 - DIICOO 1N7..ZOOZ Te ■ tp rllllc.: lmp,o-lt Plognm Rec 1mnt1C1 dlllloft FOlffl :I, Pate 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM Project Name ·SH 285 Modlans-Bmadway lg Gigjn eaiu Project Description Limits • s Bmadway 1g s Gilpin extend •• Length (milesJ....l.L__ Description · Reconstruct ralsad roodians tD otiminate through and loft turning moyeroents from SH 285 onto some unsianalize<J ~ tfflt!l Eun dosure at Pead Emerson Comna and Marion Partial dosures at Peonsvtvania Wubingtpn and Ogden Pmvide riaht tum acceleration/doootocation laou fer tho westbound direction at Ctar1<son Oownina and Hamoden Reconstruci right rum channelization islands at L.ggan , Clarkson and Qawning Environmental studies deskm and constnx;tion are included as r·.oa11rt..1oo!Lf lhwu,isuPieCP"li,.ec.it _______ _ No R O W acauis itions required Des ig n Status : Croa1 Section Ch1racteriatics Existing After EA/EIS Status : 1997 Through Lanes : ~ _§__ ROW Status : NIA Median Type : Start Construction : 1998 lveacl (see Tab . 4) ...f..__ ...f..__ Open to the Public : 1998 tvean Shoulder Type : (see Tab. 5) __Q___ __Q___ ROW Width : (feel) 'lSCin__ :iillDlt_ Note s· A relatively htcn frequency of broadstde and aaoroach tum type acci de nts occur at unsiQ nalized cross streets co SH 285 between Bmadwav and Gilc in This omiect will imcrove safety and operationa l charactedsUcs on SH 285 DIICOG • 1117..ao2 Trwpal ........ U_lt l'nlgran "-"' •••a Ponn30 PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA FORM SAFETY, TRAFFIC REDUCTION/AIR QUALITY AND INTERMODAL PROJECTS Project Name· SH 285 Mldilol · Bmadway tc GHpjn COOT Safety: 1 52 to 36 80 (Safety benefit/cost ratio) Traffic Reduction/Air Oualjty pm;ects · TCM , Contingency Measures. °' Conformity Measures:_~Nt~A~ ___ (discuss in comments) Daily Cost ____ .,...:,..... ________ ,(wr.i<sheet in Append ix F) Daily Revenues: __ ...Jl."'---------- IMII the project be fully operational within 3 years?-'""'--------------- lotem)odal projects· Travel timr (minutes): ___ ~N=[~A ____ (before project) Travel time (minutes): ___ ~Nt-A ____ (after project) Notes and Discussion : Safety ratio obta ined from COOT memo titled • HES Prniect Locations • dated December 30 1995 State mileoost 260 oz through 261 JO ENOINEER'S DETAILED ESTIMATE METHOD Project Name: SH 285 Medians Road/Facility Name : Hampden Ave . Routl'J Number: Hwy . 285 Item Bid Items (estimate) .......... .. Striping ........................................... . Percent Range 1-5%of Construction Signing and Traffic Control ..... 5 • 25% of (Defaui: • 20%) Mobilizatian ......... . ................................ 3 • 10% of (Rounj up to ne:tt $1 ,000) (Default• 7%) TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION BID ITEMS (CBI) force Account Uems Utilities .................................. . Contingencies .............................. .. ....... 1-3%ofCBI 15%ofCBI TOTAL OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS (Cl) COOT Construction Engineering (CE) 10-i 5%ofCI CE Indirects (25% of CE) ..................... . Pre limi nary Engjn ee nng <PE) COOT PE ................................... .. ........ 5 -14% of Cl PE Indirects (25% of COOT PE) Entity PE (if applicable) ....... Consultant PE (if applicable) ....... Percent S.lactacl Costs Subtotal $900 ,000(A) (A) 5% -45 ,000 Subtotal $945 ,000(8) (B) 20% 189,000 Subtotal $1 ,134,000(C) (C) 7% 79,400 $1 ,213,400 1% 12 ,1C'~ 15% 182,000 $1 ,407 ,500 15% 211 ,100 52,800 Subtotal $ 263 ,300 10% 140,800 35 ,200 TOTAL COST AS OF DEC . 1995 WHEN ENR NAT. CCI STOOD AT 5524 $1 ,847 ,400 Certifir.atjon of Cost Estima,'!I (Construction project costs must be certified by a registered professional engineer in the State of Colorado .) I. Charles '!. Esterly (Name -Print) certify that I have prepared/approved the above cost est imate . Si~#~~ 17787 Colora do P.E. # 1z.lzz I 'f;~-~ Date ~ 'l t ~~ - ln!llc ~~■elblllty Study a..a..ow•.., -u ,,.,..,u,.•rrv Travel Lanes ii k ='lo.is· Travel Lanes Jr ✓Median Pav,ng -~:-·. 7 •t -~~ Figwr< /6 Typical Sections