HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967 Resolution No. 026I
I
I
UESULUTIUN NU. 2G, S.EJUES 01'' 1907
A 1u;8<JLUTIUN AOUl'TINU 1"1NJJINli8 ANU CUNC LU8IUN8, JJUH.8UAN'1' TU THE PHUVISIONS
OF' f'll/\ PTFH 1 =-t!t. /\ JlTff' LE 2 1. /\S /\MF. NllF.O. COMMONLY JlF.FF.RRF.D TO AS "THF.
l\llJNlt_'ll•:\1. :\NNE.'\:\TlttN :\l'T •ti•' llt1i i 1" :\NII :\NNUtlNCINU Tiii ~ G IT\" '11 INTl<NT NHI' TU
ANNEX THE TERRITORY DESCRIBED THEREIN.
WHEREAS, on or about April 6, 1967, there was filed with the City Clerk of the City
of Englcwocxl a petition requesting annexation of the following described territory to the City,
lo wit:
DeglMlng at the NE corner of the NE 1/4 SE 1/4, Section 32, Township 4
South, Range 6R West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Thence Westerly along
the North line of said NE 1/4 SE 1/4, Section 32, which is the centerline
nf W1tflt Hnrhnnuth ""''"llf'. Inn point on th<' <'t•ntorlfnu of South nrynnt
~t.aet, 11aid point would be equidistant from the East line of Block 15,
Boulevard Gardens, and the West line of Block 16, Boulevard Gardens,
lf said lines were extended to intersect with the said center line of
West Dartmouth Avenue; thence Southerly along the centerline of South
Rryanl ~rcct to a point on the South line of said NE 1/4 SE 1/4: Section
32, thence Easterly along the South Une of said NE 1/4 S:E 1/4, Section 32 lo
the SE corner of said NE 1/4 SE 1/4, Section 32; thence Northerly along
the t:ast line of Nt; 1/4 St: 1/4, Section 32 to the point of beginning, con ..
talnlng all of Block 16, Boulevard Gardens, and the contiguous one-half
of HIJ Hlrt•t•lH HUrromkllUI( Hiiiei llJock W, UXUUJ>lfllt( lhurufrom nlJ porllontt
of present West Floyd Avenue lying South of the South line of said NE 1/4
RF. 1 /4, Section 32, and,
w1mn EA:-;, RRlrl llf'lltlon wnR rf'f"rrf'f"I to Cltv Council Rnd Ro.hf Council r1fd. nt Its
t•cguhu· m ctjUng on Mout.luy Aiu·H J 'I, Wti 'I, ut.lopl a resotullon rtndlng lhul ~utd ptjl1l1on
auhatantlally compiled with the prov1sl.ons of Chapter 139, Srticle 21, as amended, setting
a time and place for a publlc hearing on eald petftlon add directing notice o.f the eame
to h•• f!f vt•n In nf•romAnf'(' with th .. provlAlonR of snfJf stntutc. e.nr1
WHEREAS, after due notice thereof, a public hearing on said petition was held,
as required, before City Council at lte regular meeting on Monday, June 5, 1967, which
hearing was devoted to the taking of evidence upon the eligibility of the said territory
fnr ""'"'~Rllc•n fn fhp ('lfv nf l-:nt!1Pwoo•f "'"'AR to wtwthC'r nnv f'Ot1f1ltlons RhonM hP Imposed
upon ttafd anneKallon,
NOW, TlltJtt;FUltE, Ufa: IT UESULVEO HY 'l'llE CITY COUNCIL U1" THE CITY 01''
F.NG T.F.\VOOO os follows:
1. That the City CouncU hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the tatdotty ·requested to be anntm!d has a tot.µ .
Jlf'rlmrt<•r nf :l. !lO!l . 4:. ff'rf nnff thRt 1. 290. 2!) f('Ct th<:'reof
(ur uppa·oxtnu.llvly JJ','i, lhua·cot') h~ conlJguous lo llltj boundart~H
of the City of Englewocxl.
h. Thnt thcrC' exists a community of interests between the
lc ,1·1·llu1·.\• p1 ·u1tt•Nc1tl lu ltc , u1111e,xrnl un•I Tht1 t '11.V uf io:11t-tluwnu•I.
c. That the territory proposed to be annexed is urban in
nature.
d. That the territory proposed to be annexed is capable of
being integrated with the City of Englewood.
e. That there was presented no evidence which would support
u rinding lhul:
I. wsH than fifty percent of the adult residents of the
territory make use of all or a part of the recreational,
c·h·lc·, He win I, rc 'llHluuH. l11th1HI rlul ur oommc.11·ul11l
facilities of the City of Englewood; or
fl. Less than twenty-five percent of the adult residents
of lhc• h•rrflory nrc• <'mployoo In tho City of F.nglowood; or
iii. One-half or more of the land in the territory is
devok'<I to agricultural uses or that the landowners
intend to continue any agricultural use presently in
••Xhtlt •nc••• for the , llf'XI fl vc• yonrtt 01· moru; or
l v. It ls not physically practicable to extend to the
area proposed to be annexed those urban services
rendered to the City of F.nglewood to its present
c •lfl ~.c ,llri .
f. That based upon the foregoing, the territory described in the petition
for annexation is eligible to be annexed to the Oity of Englewood •
:-1:1
34
ltESOLUTION NO. 26. SERIES OF 1967
(conllnuod)
2. That the City Council is under no duty or obligation to annex any territory
to the City, even though the same is eligible therefor, and the City Council, having
held a public hearing upon the annexation of the hereinabove-described territory, and
having duly considered the same, does hereby conclude that it would not be in the best
interests of the City or its present inhabitants to annex the same and does hereby announce
its intent not to annex said territory, by reason of which there shall be no further proceedings
undertaken tote accomplish its annexation.
ATTEST:
City Clerk-Treasurer
....
I, Stephen A. Lyon, City C~ erk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, do hereby
certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of a resolution
adopted by the City Council of the City of Englewood at its regular meeting on 5 ---t-d ,
July, 1967.
City Clerk-Treasurer
I
I
-1