The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1967 Resolution No. 034I I ·I RESOLUTION NO. 34, SERIES OF 1967 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF MAGNIFICENT MATADOR. INC . FOR A HOTET. /\ND RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE, TO BE •~t>L'A'l'ElJ '1 1 'J', :;oll'l'll lllU>/\IM/\Y, ENl:l,l·:wuuu, L'U f.UIU\L>O. WHEREAS, Ralph Codina has heretofore applied to the City ouncil of the C i Ly of Rnyl<·wood ,,s t h e local licensing authority, pur s uant to the provi::;ions of Chapter 75, Article 2, Colorado Re vised !:>l..ilult.•:; l'Ju J , lu1 · l11t· i :::a1.a1w t.· ol ..i hole! o.Jnt.I rc::.;La ur a nl li4uor license to be located at 4155 South Broadway, Englewood, Colorado. WHEREAS, Council has held a public hearing on said application ;ind h;i~ <lu l y ("Onr.irl0r0n th r :~.,m0 , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD that there are hereby adopted the following findings ;inn C'O n r lu ::;ion s , whirh finninq::; ;:ind c onclusions shall b e deemed to be the rcd::>Ons iu wriL.i11y lor Lh e decision or the local lic ensi ng authority herein contained, as required by the provisions of 1963 C • R. S • 7 5-2 -4 2-( 3) : 1. The application for said license is in proper form, is accompanied the appropriate fee and all procedural requirements of Chapter 75 Article 2, Colorado Revised Statutes 1963, including, without limitation, posting of public notice and appropriate public hearing, have been complied with. 2. There has not been a denial of any application for the :i.1111•· ln•·.11 inn wi tl1i11 1111 • lwn (~) Y'"'r:: n··~t-prr-r1'"'rlinq t-hP rl;i f P nf this application. 3. The applicant has executed a lease which will entitle him to the pos::;cssion of th0 premises for which the application has been 111..iul..!, upon ~•l'f.J' ov...a L u I h i:; o.Jpplic<.l Lion. 4. The sale of liquor as contemplated in the application is nol prohibited by the zoning laws of the City of Englewood. 5. The location of the premises at the above address is not within 500 feet of any public or parochial school or the principal campus of any college or university or seminary. n . n;i srd npon th0 r>ri or i_nvestiqrition of t h e Engl e wood Police Dc pacLmcnl, as well <.l::> Lite e v.iuence <Jdduccd at the time of the hearing, the applicant possesse s good moral character and is fully qualified, both morally and financially, to conduct the type of business for wh ich the ~pplic~tion h;i::; b0cn m~d e . 7. The application herein is for a "new" license, within the meaning of 1963 C.R.S. 75-2-38 and the criteria for the issuance of the same is gov ern ed by the provisions of 1963 C.R.S. 75-2-42, rather than the provisions of 1963 C.R.S. 75-2-8 (2). 8. During the course of the public hearing, the applicant pcc..:::h..m Leu pell L.io11 ::; L>c.:..ii · .iny Lite u.iyrHa Lure::; of 4Yl v er son::; who frequented the present restaurant as customers and the signatures of 7i8 p ersons, rcsicJiny wl lhin a n approximate six-block area. •rwo !:r•p ;ir,,f '" qrn11p:: nf prnf t•::f ;in f r: f)rPH('Otrrl f)<"'f-i f-ion i:: Or r0mon st r.,nr0R conLJin.iny <lpproxi1ndlely ~J~ ::;.iynal u rcs 01 person::; residing ln the Atlm~ t'ff Pil. '1. rn .i•lcl i I ion I n I hr nffi rPrr. nf t-hP .,ppl i r;int-, t-hP ownnr of the location sought for the license and the persons in charge of circulation of applicant's petitions, five persons appeared and spoke at the public hearing in favor of the granting of the license, who were non-r esi dents of the City, but who testified that they frequented the present restaurant facilities and were of the opinion that the service of alcoholic beverages is needed and would be desirable at this location. 10. Four persons testified in opposition to the application. Two r e presented thnt th0y wPrc ~ppearing on behalf of persons living in the neighborhood a nd stated that there had been an insufficient ::hnwi 11q nf .1 '"'''" n1 · d•·:: i r•· In l1;iv(• t-h.~· l i rr-nr.r i An 11 rn. ()n0 or>ponPrl its issuanc~ on moral grounds. One, being a resident o f the City, but not of the n eiqhborhood, also expressed his opposition to it. 11. c· .. 11 :1 id1·1 ·i11'1 .ill 11f lltn ,,l1nvn, ln'fnlhnr w ·i t-h ,,11 n l ·hnr matt e rs presented in the pre-hearing investigation and the public hearing itself , Council co n c lud es that the application sh ould be approved for the following reasons: 4~ 4li l :uo .. I 111 I .. ,, 11... l ·I . ;: . ., I .:-;o .. r I 'J L a -The a pplic a nt a nd its pres e nt stockhold er::;, officers andmanager are morally, professionally and fl 11 c1n <.:in l ly 1fllrt lifi 11 il t o ,.."rry on the business wh i rh i !'; ~o n c'fh t to he co n d u e tcd at t his l o c a ti on: b -Th e r e is only on e other hotel and r e st a u ra n t outlet within the immediate area: and c -The evidence presented establishes the need f or a hot e l a nd r es taurant liquor license at this loca- tion, as well as the desires of the residents to have the •!c.11ne locatod Lh c r ~. U l ·: L 'l' i"U l<'l'lll-:1\ Hl·:::u t .V l':IJ ll1.1l, l1.1 rsu d 11p1J11 ll1 n n l111v n r i11 1linr 1r. ,,n<l rP;ino n n , R;i iil il pplir ;i tion Rhould b e , and is hereby, approv e d. nr-: T'r P TT n 'T'llF.R mo:sn r.VP.O t h;i t t h 0 C j t y-C J e rk T rea sur e r is he r eby a u tho r ize d a nd dl rcc l e d L o send by cer l i l led 111 dl l L u L11 c applic a nt at th e address shown in the application, a copy of this Re solution, pursuant to the provisions of 1963 C.R.S. 75-2-42 (3), w hi~h sh;i ll b e deeme d t o b e t h e d e cision of the local licensing a u thor ity. /\OOP'r t·:n /\N O I\ PPl~O VED U1 i H 2 n d dil y of o r:::t ob er , l 9b 1. Ma yor Attest : Cily CluLk -'1'1 c...:.i:1u1 ~·;1 I I ..