Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1959-05-07 PZC MINUTESPage 378 (b) Amend Subdivision Regulations, Article II , Section 1, Paragraph J , by deleting the words "arterial streets" and substituting therefor the words "arterial and industrial streets". (c) Amend Article II, Section 1, Paragraph K, by deleting the words "arterial streets" and substituting therefor "arterial and industrial streets" and adding the following at the end of the · present section: "Sidewalks, industrial: 4 feet, located against the back of the curb. If an industrial street is also an arterial street, the specifications for arterial street sidewalk location shall apply". Amend Traffic Ordinance No. 39, Series of 1947, by designating East Jefferson Drive as an arterial street retroactive to January 1, 1959. Respectfully submitted, By order of the City Planning and Zoning Commission. Jewell M. Banfield Recording Secretary MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. Date: Subject: April 23, 1959 Subdivision Paving Policy It was agreed that Council should be notified that Planning Commission does not feel any change in Ordinance or Subdivision Regulation paving provisions is necessary. If a specific waiver of paving requirements is felt necessary in the future, more specific reasons will be presented. Respectfully submitted, By order of the City Planning and Zoning Commission. Jewell M. Banfield Recording Secretary * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 7 ·i 1959 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Jones at 8:10 P. M. Members Present: Braun, Hill, Jones, Kelley, Romans, Schmitt, Lacy, Ex-officio Members Absent: None Cecil Zeitlin 1670 Winona Ct. SUBDIVISION Southwest Corner of East Je:f.ferson Drive and South Clarkson Street. Hearing No. 15-59 Mr. Cecil Zeitlin appeared to discuss the preliminary design for platting the subject area. The design had been submitted to the Planning Office earlier in accordance with current policies. The tilities Department noted that the nearest sewer line is a substantial distance, possibly 500 feet, from the subject area. The Public Works Department noted that a triangle corner at East Jefferson Drive and South Clarkson Street has been used for an indefinite period as a part of the roadway and should be indicated as such. Mr. Zeitlin indicated he would be willing to dedicate the additional right-of-way at the corner and that he was aware of his respons i bility to connect t o ~the sewer regardless of the distance. Mr. Jones presented a letter from the business manager of the Englewood School District as follows: Mr. Lee Jones, Chairman City Planning Commission City of Englewood Englewood, Colorado Dear Mr. Jones: "Englewood Public Schools Englewood, Colorado April 29, 1959 The Board of Education of School District No. 1 is interested in the parcel of land roughly bounded by what would be Lehigh Avenue and Jefferson Drive and Washington Street and what I I I I I I Page 379 would be the alley between Washington Street and Clarkson Street. (Please see attached map). Due to extended building facilities this additional tract is desired for educational purposes. A portion of this property is owned by Ce cil Zeitlin, 1670 Winona Court, Denver, and a portion is owned by Charles E. Spath, Jr., 3787 So. Clarkson, Englewood , Appraisals a r e being secured by the Board of Education on the above properties. Yours very truly, /S I Charles S. Dolezal Charles S. Dolezal Business Manager" Mr. Hill and Mr. Braun, indicated that Council is now considering a change in policy to implement a performance bond requirement as now authorized in the Subdivision Regulations for street improvements. They stated that this provision might even be changed to require an excrow payment instead of the bond. It was agreed that in light of a possible change of street improvement requirements and other factors concerned with the public interest, this matter should be given some additional consideration. Braun moved: Romans seconded: That further consideration of this matter be tabled until May 21. Ayes: Braun, Hill, Jones, Romans, Schmitt Nays: Kelley Absent: None Chairman Jones stated that since the May 21st meeting is devoted to planning only, the Commission meet at 7:30 instead of 8:00 P. M. to consider this matter. Dr. Robert Byall 3920 s. ClarKSOn Rezoning Corner Property South of Intersection of South Sherman Street and East Jefferson Drive from R-2-B to C-1. Hearing No. 12-59B April 9, 1959 April 23, 1959 Dr. Robert Byall and Mrs. Ruby McMillan appeared to discuss the rezoning of the subject area. Dr. Byall presented a petition signed by adjacent and nearby property owners. He indicated that only one person approached refused to sign the petition for the rezoning as requested. He also presented a plot plan and preliminary drawings of a structure being considered for the site if rezoned. Mr. Jones pointed out that the setback requirements as pictured on the plot plans would require action by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals before being allowed. Mrs. McMillan and Dr. Byall requested that her property be added to the rezoning consideration since off-street parking requirements might be met by using the back yard of her present building. The Planning Director reminded those present that the back yard as it exists at present could not legally be allocated for off-street parking since it is required residential land area for the existing two-family use as a part of Mrs. McMillan's residence. It was agreed that possibly a change of use of the present residential building to commercial use if rezoned would allow some off-street parking space if there was some left over after serving the new commercial use of the present McMillan residential building. Mrs. Mc Nillan stated that she definitely wished to add her property to the rezoning consideration. Hill moved: Schmitt seconded: That the Planning and Zoning Commission proceed to legally advertise, post the premises and hold a public hearing on June 4, 1959, relative to proposed rezoning as follows: Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Hiner's Subdivision, Arapahoe County; Colorado, from R-2-B (residential) classification to C-1 (commercial). Ayes: Braun, Hill, Jones, Kelley, Romans, Schmitt Nays: None Absent: None Charles F. Johnson 3149 S. Broadway Annexation Te ntat·ve Zoning Study for Area South of Belleview and West of South Broadway Hearing No. ll-59A March 19, 1959 The Planning Director presented a land use map of the subject area substantiated by photo- graphic slides. He also presented a land use plan drawn by a private construction firm in 1955 at City expense. The Planning Director explained that Mr. Charles Johnson, who had requested the consid e r.a t~on for possible annexation of the area, wishes to construct an office build"ng with a drive-in restaurant as part of the ground floor. The office building and primary retail shop use of the ground floor is permissible under C-1 zoning as is a restaurant if not operated as a drive-in estaglishment. The land use survey indicated that the property controlled by Mr. Johnson might practically be zoned for C-1 use without seriously affecting the future four-lane highway traffic pattern. Mr. Johnson asked if Planning Commissi n's findings would be accepted by Council if the area were annexed and if the rezoning process could run concurrently with the annexation process. The Planning Director explained the City Attorney's ruling that it could run concurrently if it were separately advertised and proper hearings held simultaneously. Page 380 It was agreed that the matter needs further consideration and on-the-site inspection by Planning Conunissi o n members. The matter will be discussed further at the June 4th, 1959, meeting. James P. Smith 3400 South Marion Rezoning 16 Lots on North End of 3400 Block Between South Marion and South Laf a yette Streets from R-1-D to either R-3-A or R-3-B Hearing No. 16-59 The Planning Director presented an application for rezoning by Mr. Smith which was accompanied by a $25.00 deposit. He stated that Mr. Smith definitely wished a hearing on the matter and that he would be prepared to present his case at that tilll3. Hill mou e d: Schmitt seconded: That the Planning and Zoning Commission proceed to legally advertise, post the premises and hold a public hearing on June 4, 1959, relative to proposed rezoning as follows: Lots 1 to 6 and 39 to 48, Block 50, Evanston Broadway addition, vacated adjacent alley, and Lot 38 Block 50, Evanston-Broadway addition, Arapahoe County, Colorado, from R-1-D (residential) classification to either R-3-A or R-3-B (multi-family residential) class if icat ion. Ayes: Braun, Hill, Jones, Kelley, Romans, Schmitt Nays: None Absent: None Planning Office City Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk For New Construction Hearing No. 17-59 The Planning Director presented a memorandum from the City Engineer to the City Manager as follows: "INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TD: Mr. J. M. LACY, Acting City Manager DATE: May 7, 1959 FROM; Mr. Wm. O. Davies SUBJECT: NEW BUILDING IN CITY OF ENGLEWOOD You will recall our discussion in reference to all new buildings to be constructed within the City of Englewood. I would like to suggest or recommend that all future property owners be required to install curb, gutter and sidewalk before a Certificate of Occupancy is granted. I have discussed this with the Building Department and they are wholeheartedly in accord. I might point out that by having curb and gutter installed by this method, we could cut down on some of our maintenance problem and possibly encourage abutting property owners to install their curb and gutter also. This requirement would place an additional load on the Engineering Department at each of the locations; however at the present time we are giving ground floor elevation at each site. /S / W. 0. Davies WM. O. DAVIES City Engineer" The Planning Director stated that this matter had been mentioned previously by the Building Inspector as being a most desirable movement. It was the opinion of the Building Inspector and the Planning Director that very little substantial hardship would result since most new residential construction is being built under VA of FHA provisions which already require curb, gutter, and sidewalk as a condition for issuance of completion certificate. The City Council has authority under the Charter and existing ordinances to require such installations as a condition to the issuance of a building permit as well as a certificate of occupancy. Romans moved: Kelley seconded: That the Planning and Zoning Conunission reconunend to the City Council that a resolution be passed requiring curb, gutter and sidewalk to be installed with all new construction within the City as a pre-requisite to the granting of a certificate of occupancy. Ayes: Braun, Hill, Jones, Kelley, Romans, Schmitt Nays: None Absent: None I I I I I I Roy E. Altenbach 4901 S. Huron Subdivision Southwest Corner of West Chenango and South Huron Street into Three Lots Page 381 Heating No. 18-59 The Planning Director presented a preliminary design for subdivision of the subject area. The Utilities Department and the Public Works Department had inspected and approved the design, contingent to the setting of the property corners in concrete. Examination of the plan revealed some discrepancy in the existing and future utility ease - ments. The Planning Director explained that these have not been checked specifically but will be prior to consideration of the design for final platting. Hill moved: Romans seconded: That the preliminary design for the subject area be approved contingent to setting the property corners in concrete and the dedication of Utility Department easements under applicable provisions of the Subdivision Regulations. Ayes: Braun, Hill, Jones, Kelley, Romans, Schmitt Nays: None Absent: None Planning Office City General Zoning Amendments Hearing No. 3-59D (Also Joint Meetings of January 14, 1959 and February 25, 1959) (Also See Hearing No. 35-58-B Nov. 20) January 22, 1959 February 5, 1959 February 19, 1959 The Planning Director presented a memorandum containing tentative amendments to the Zoning Ordinance as agreed upon by the last joint meeting of the Planning Commission and the Board of Adjustment and Appeals on March 11, 1959. The Planning Commission considered the amend- ments which prohibit repair work outside of a public garage, defined gasoline and oil service stations, and defined machine shops. These amendments were discussed and approved. It was then agreed that the entire movement toward generally amending the Zoning Ordinance now is ready for recommendation for Council action. Schmitt moved: Hill seconded: That the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council that the Zoning Ordinance be generally amended as indicated in the attached memorandum. Ayes: Braun, Hill, Jones, Kelley, Romans, Schmitt Nays: None Absent: None Planning Office City Rezoning Policy Time Limit for Submitting Rezoning Applications. Hearing No. 19-59 The Planning Director reported on the recent Institute for City Managers at Boulder, Colorado, in connection with zoning. He stated that Boulder, Greeley, Colorado Springs, and other Colorado cities have a policy of considering rezoning applications only at certain periods during the year. The most prevalent gap of time seemed to be every six months. Various fees exist, running as high as $100.00 per request as charged by the City of Arvada. If denied, the applicant receives a repayment of $50.00. If granted, the entire $100.00 is needed for additional legal publication costs to carry the _matter through to completion. The Planning Director stated that it is the hope of the Planning Office to begin a regular system of quarterly departmental activity reports as is now done in other phases of City administration activities. He suggested that a quarterly limit on considering rezoning applications would expedite thorough consideration by devoting concentrated efforts four times each year toward consideration of rezoning rather than upon submission by an applicant. He also stated that since no policy presently exists for re-submission of a rezoning applica- tion, it is an imposition on abutting property owners who do not wish a zoning change to require them to defend their stand any more often than necessary. In the following discussion, Commissioner.s offered an additional policy of requiring an additional time for re-submission of a zone change once it had been considered and denied previously. It was agreed that this should be considered and that the whole matter would be discussed again at a future meeting. There being no further business to come before the Planning and Zoning Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 10:40 P. M. ftpproved:/S/ J. M. Lacy Att. Jewell M. Banfield Recording Secretary Page 382 MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. Date: Subject: Recommendation: May 7, 1959 Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk for New Construction That a resolution be passed requiring curb, gutter and sidewalk to be installed with all new construction within the City as a pre-requisite to the granting of a Certificate of Occupancy . Respectfully submitted, By order of the City Planning and Zoning Commission Jewell M. Banfield Recording Secretary MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Date: Subject: Recommendation: May 7, 1959 General Zoning Amendments That the Zoning Ordinance be generally amended as indicated in the attached memorandum. Respectfully submitted, By order of the City Planning and Zoning Commission Jewell M. Banfield Recording Secretary INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: City Council, Board of Adjustment and Appeals, Building Inspector and City Attorney DATE: May 11, 1959 FROM: Mr. Joe M. Lacy SUBJECT: GENERAL AMENDMENT OF ZONING ORDINANCE The tentative amendments to the Englewood Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 45, Series of 1955) are hereby submitted to the City Council as finally recommended by the Planning Commission on May 7th, 1959. The material contained herein has been under detailed study and consideration since January of 1959. Numerous conferences have been held between the Planning Commission and the Build- ing Inspector, City Attorney and City Manager. Three joint ..meetings of various City officials and the Planning Commission and the Board of Adjustment and Appeals were held on January 14th, February 25th, and March 11th. Many of the amendments contained herein are necessary to implement the new City Cherter provisions. Others reflect a need for additional control and keepirg up with changing con- ditions within the community. (PAGE 1) Amend Article I, Section 5 , by adding to the first paragraph the following sentence: "This ordinance is hereby amended by deleting the words 'Zoning Board of Adjustment" wherever said words appear therein and inserting in place thereof the words "the Board of Adjustment and Appeals", and by deleting the words "City Planning Commission" wherever said words appear therein and inserting in place thereof the words "City Planning and Zoning Commission."" (PAGE 2) Amend Article I, Section 5, by inserting therein the following definition between No. 15 and 16: "15a. CARPORT -- A form of private garage providing space for housing or storage of automobiles and enclosed on not more than two (2) sides by walls. The dimensions determinirg the overall size of the carport shall be measured fr om the extreme edge of any part of the building." I I I I I I Page 383 (PAGE 3) Amend Article I, Section 5, 25, (Definition of Family) by deleting existing definition and substituting therefor the following: "25. FAMILY-- a. An individual or two or more persons related byblood, marriage or adoption living together as a single house- keeping unit and doing their cooking in a single kitchen on the premises in a dwelling unit; or b. A group of not more than three (3) persons of the same sex, .who need not be related by blood, marriage or adoption living together as a single housekeeping unit in a one-family dwelling as defined in Article I , Section 5, 23, (2) o f Ordinance 45, Series of 1955; in either case exclusive of usual servants." (PAGE 3) Amend Article I, Section 5, "Definitions", Sub-section 30, by adding to the existing definition the f ollowing: "All care and repair including dismantling herein permitted shall be carried on entirely inside a bu ilding." (PAGE 3) Amend Article I, Section 5, by inserting therein the following definition between Nos. 30 and 31: "30a. GASOLINE AND OIL SERVICE STATIONS (FILLING STATIONS) -- A filling station for the sale at retail of gasoline and oil and other automotive fuel and lubrication products normally used in aut omotive vehicles. No vehicle before, during or after servicing shall be stored in any portion of dedicated public right-of-way." (PAGE 5) Amend Article 1, Section 5, "Definitions", by inserting between Items 46 and 47 the following: "46a. MACHINE SHOP -- A building containing machinery for the manufacture, modification or repair of metal goods and automotive equipment. Such use must be conducted entirely inside a building and does not include the dismantling of automotive vehicles." (PAGE 6) Amend Article 1, Section 5, Sub-section 62, "Definitions", by deleting the existing defini tion and substituting therefor: "62. PUBLIC NOTICE Notice by one publication in the official newspaper of the City at least fifteen (15) days before any hearing, or before consideration of any other matters about which notice is required. In addition, all rezoning hearings, and such cases that directly affect abutting or adjoining property and any other hearings re- quired by this ordinance shall be further advertised by posting of the property subject to change for fifteen (15) consecutive days prior to the hearing or consideration of the case. Such posting shall consist of a sign tpree feet by four feet in size, located four feet above gr ound level in a conspicuous place, reading in letters intelligible fr om the adjoining street right-of-way." (PAGE 9) Amend Article II, Section 4, Sub-sections 1 and 2, by deleting existing wording and sub- stituting therefor: "SECTION 4 APPEAL APPLICATION FEES 1. Any person making appeal to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall deposit at the time of appeal, a sum determined by the Board as necessary to pay for reasonable costs of such appeal. 2. Any person applying to the City Planning and Zoning Commission for Zoning Amendments shall deposit · with application for amendment a sum determined by the Commission as necessary to cover cost f or pro- cessing said amendment and for advertising costs, but in no event shall such sum be le ss than $25.00." (PAGE 9) Amend Article II, Section 5, Sub-sections 1 and 2, by deleting existing wording and sub- stituting therefor: "SECTION 5 --RULES OF PROCEDURE Each Board or Commission shall adopt rules concerning all proceedings before it. Such rules shall provide, among other things, that: 1. 2. All hearings shall be held at such time and place as designated by the Board or Commission. Notice shall be given f or all hearings as provided in Article I, Section 5, Sub-section 62." Page 384 (PAGE 9) Amend Article II, Section 5, Sub-sections 1 and 2, by deleting existing wording and sub- stituting therefor : "SECTION 5 RULES OF PROCEDURE Each Board or Commission shall adopt rules concerning all pro- ceedings before it. Such rules shall provide, among other things, that: 1. 2. All hearings shall be held at such time and place as designated by the Board or Commission. Notice shall be given for all hearings as provided in Article I, Section 5, Sub-section 62." (PAGE 9) Amend Article II, Section 2, Sub-section 7, by deleting the existing wording and sub- stituting therefor: "7. APPEALS FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR Appeals to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals with respect to interpretations and decisions of the Building Inspector in zoning requirements may be made by any person aggrieved or by any officer, department, board or com- mission of the City affected by any decision of the Building Inspector. Such appeal shall be made within a reasonable time, as provided by the rules of the Board, by filing with the Building Inspector and with the Board of Adjustment and Appeals a notice of appeal specifying the grounds thereof. The Building Inspector shall forthwith transmit to the Board all of the papers con- stituting the record upon which the action appealed from was taken." (PAGES 9 AND 10) Amend Article II, Section 6, Sub-sections 1 and 2, and Sub-sections 4 and 5 be amended as follows: "SECTION 6 --ORGANIZATION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. MEMBERS -- There is hereby created a Board of Adjustment and Appeals consisting of five members appointed by the City Council, and serving overlapping terms of four years. Members shall be qualified tax-paying electors, residents of the City at least one year immediately prior to the date of their appointment, and shall hold no other office or position in the City administration. TERMS OF OFFICE One member shall be appointed to serve until February 1, 1960; one member to serve until February 1, 1961; one member to serve until February 1, 1962; and two members to serve until February 1 , 1963. Hereafter all members of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall be appointed for four-year terms. FILLING OF VACANCIES Leave "as is". REMOVAL OF MEMBERS All members of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall be subject to removal by the appointing authority. OFFICERS -- The members of the Board shall elect from among their members a Chairman and a Vice-Chairman to serve for a term of one year. The City Manager shall designate a Recording Secretary for the Board, who shall sign any documents or communications from the Board "by order of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals"." (PAGE 10) Amend Article II, Section 6, Sub-section 11, by adding thereto: "The findings and decisions of the Board shall b e final, subject only to judicial review." I I I I I I Page 385 (PAGE 11) Amend Article II, Section 7, Sub-section 3, by deleting the existing wording and sub- stituting therefor: "3. INTERPRETATION The Board is authorized to interpret the provisions of this Ordinance and, when deemed necessary by the Board , submit reports to the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council suggesting amendments to the Ordinance to clarify the intent and purpose of any section, article or paragraph on which it has occasion to rule." (PAGE 11) Amend Article III, Section 2 and Section 3 , by deleting existing wording and substituting therefor: "SECTION 2 --INITIATION OF CHANGE A proposed change of zone may be submitted by the City Council , the City Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Adjustment and Appeals , without fee, or by an application with proper fee, by one or more of the owners of property within the area proposed to be changed. SECTION 3 CHANGING THE ORDINANCE 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall meet to consider proposed changes or amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and map at such times and places as established by rules and regu- lations of the Commission, and after public notice of hearing. 2. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval or disapproval of a change, eit her in whole or in part. Recom- mendations in conformity with such approved changes shall be present ed to the City Council and an ordinance embodying such changes, in whole or in part, may be adopted by the City Council after public hearing thereon. A favorable vote of two-thirds 3. of the entire membership of the City Council shall be necessary in the event of adoption by the City Council of such recommendations in part when such partial adoption has not been recommended by the Planning and Zoning Comnnission. In the event the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends against a change in the Ordinance either in whole or in part, a report thereon shall be made to the City Council. The appli- cant , if dissatisfied with the recommendations and report of the Commission, may appeal to the City Council, and the City Council shall thereupon review the recommendation and report of the Planning and Zoning Commission. On such appeal, the City Council may, after public hearing, make such change in said Ordinance, but only by a favorable vote of two-thirds (2 /3) of its entire membership. 4. In case of a protest against any changes in the Ordinance or map, signed by the owners of 20% or more of the area of the lots in- cluded in such proposed change , or of those immediately adjacent in the rear thereof extending 100 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto, e x tending 100 feet from the street frontage of such opposite lots, such amendment shall not b ecome effective except by the favorable vote of three fourths (3 /4) of all members of the City Council." (PAGE 12) Amend Article IV , Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, by addin g to Paragraph 13 as sub-paragraph "(c)", and amend Section 8 (R-3-A Zone) and 9 (R-3-B Zone) (as amended by Ordinance 17, Series of 1958) by adding to Paragraph 15 as sub-paragraph "(b)", the following: "(b) or (c) (as applicable) No use shall be permitted within the district that emits an obnoxious or dangerous degree of heat, glare, radiation, or fumes, or undue or excessive noise beyond any boundary line of the lot upon which the use is located." (PAGE 16) Amend Article IV. Section 5 (R-1-D Zone), Paragraph 13, by adding thereto the following: "(c) The housing of not more than one (1) non-transient roomer or boarder in any single-family dwelling shall be permitted provided no si g n shall be displayed, and no separate cooking facilities shall be maintained in connection with such accessory use." (PAGES 18, 20, 22 AND AMENDMENT) Amend Article IV , Section 6 (R-2-A Zone) and Section 7 (R-2-B Zone), Paragraph 13, by ad ding thereto the following to be known as "(c)"; and amend Article IV, Section 8 (R-3-A Zone) and Section 9 (R-3-B Zone) (as amended by Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1958), Paragraph 15, by adding thereto the following to be known as "(b)": "(c) or (b) (as applicable) The housing of not more than two (2) non-transient roomers or boarders in any conforming single-family dwelling shall be permitted, provided no sign shall be displayed, no separate cooking facilities shall be maintained in connection with such accessory use, and no more than one person shall occupy any one room as sleeping quarters." Page 386 (PAGE 20) Amend Article IV, Section 9 (as amended by Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1958) Paragraph 3, (b), (2), (a), by de:J_eting "360 sq. ft." and substituting therefor "450 sq. ft.". (PAGE 20) Amend Article IV, Section 9, (as amended by Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1958) Paragraph 5, (b) by deleting "50 ft." and subs ti tu ting therefor "100 ft.". (PAGE 20) Amend Article IV, Section 9, (as amended by Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1958) Paragraph 8, (b) (1) by deleting "5 ft ." and supstituting therefor "10 ft.". (PAGE 32) Amend Article VI, 4, by adding thereto the following paragraph : "(h) REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT -- Required off-street parking spaces in residential districts shall not be provided in areas required as minimum front yard. (See definition of "Lot Lines" and "Yards", Article I, Section 5, Nos. 46 "Lot Lines" and 77 "Yards", respectively)." (PAGE 34) Amend Article VI, 12, by adding thereto: /S/ J. M. LACY JOE M. LACY "(b) On a corner lot in a residential . district, nothing shall be permitted that will prevent a clear, unobstructed view above a horizontal plane three and one-half (3 1 /2) feet above the top of the curb of a triangle area determined by the inter- section curb lines and a straight line joining said curb lines at points which are 25 feet distant from the point of inter- section of the curb lines, me a sured along said curb lines. The only exceptions shall be utility company poles and traffic regulatory devi c es." Planning and Traffic Director JML /ij" * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAY 21, 1959 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Jones at 7:30 P. M. Members Present: Braun, Hill, Jones, Kelley, Romans, Schmitt Lacy, Ex-officio Members absent: None Cecil Zeitlin 1670 Winona Ct. Braun moved: Subdivision Southwest Corner of East Jefferson Drive and South Clarkson Street Hill seconded: That the Zeitlin matter be removed from the table. Ayes: Braun, Hill, Jones, Kelley, Romans, Schmitt Nays: None Absent: None Hearing No. 15-59A May 7, 1959 Mr. Zeitlin appeared for further consideration of subdividing the subject area. The Planning Director reported that further study of the proposed subdivision confirmed that the nearest logical sewer connection is approximately 350 feet from the nearest point in the subdivision, making sewer service considerably expensive to the proposed lots. Mrs. Romans reported that the School Board had offered Mr. Zeitlin $4 ,550.00 for the western portion of the subject area. The School Board authorized condemnation action if the offer has not been accepted by June 1. Braun moved: Hill seconded: That the preliminary design be approved and a hearing set for June 4th if Mr. Zeitlin submits the final plan to the Planning Office by 5:00 P. M. May 2 9 . Otherwise the hearing will be held July 9. Ayes: Braun, Hill, Jones, Kelley, Romans, Schmitt Nays: None Absent: None I I I