HomeMy WebLinkAbout1961-11-09 PZC MINUTESI
I
i
I
Page 599
Mrs. Romans stated a 16' easement had ~~en provided, but she wondered if it would be more
desirable to have an alley. She pointed out that in an Industrial Zone, a 20' alley is
the minimum width.
Discussion f ollowed.
Pershing moved:
Rice seconded: That the preliminary plat of Raritan Industrial Park be received and
referred to the proper Department Heads and Companies for consideration.
The motion carried unanimously.
IV. CARMEL · PARK · CASE #22-61
The Planning Commission was presented with a preliminary plat of a proposed subdivision,
bounded on the north by West Grand Avenue, on the east by South Acoma Street, on t he south
by West Belleview Avenue, and on the west by South Cherokee Street.
It was pointed out that there was a portion of Acoma Street that had not been dedicated;
and there was a lane for access through the center of the property that had been dedicated.
If this lane were to be vacated, the developers would in turn dedicate the rest of Acoma
Street.
Discussion followed.
Miles moved:
Rice seconded: That the preliminary plat of the proposed subdivision, Carmel Park,
be received and referred to the proper Department Heads and Companies
for consideration.
The motion carried unanimously.
V. JENSEN SUBDIVISION CASE #20-61C
September 21, 1961
August 10 , 1961
July 20, 1961
Mrs. Romans stated the preliminary plats had been referred to the Department Heads and
Companies; they were now back in the Planning Office with the comments and corrections sub-
mitted . Additional easements were required by Colorado Central Power Company, and
Mountain States Telephone and .Telegraph Company. The one foot reservation imposed in the
Reece Subdivision will have to be nullified by legal instrument.
Rice moved:
Pershing seconded: That the preliminary plats of Jensen Subdivision be referred to
Mr. Jensen for · corrections.
The motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Miles was excused from the meeting.
VI. OLD BUSINESS
Mrs. Romans stated there had been further contact to her office by residents of the Gordon
Tract; and that she would continue to work with the residents of the area in an ef f ort to
come up with a solution that would be satisfactory to all.
Mrs. Frantz, from the Pleasant View Lane area, had also contacted Mrs. Romans on the pro-
posed subdivision Mr. Walden wanted. Mrs. Romans stated that she told Mrs. Frantz it was
the feeling of the Commission that the entire area should be considered at once. Mrs.
Frantz also asked if the Planning Commission could instigate a rezoning of this area to
a zone classification they felt would be .appropriate.
VII. NEW BUSINESS
Mrs. Romans gave a brie f review of the land use study the staff has been working on. They
will obtain assessments, uses, and conditions of the property; all to be listed on a large
overlay.
The meeting adjourned at 11:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Gertrude G. Welty
Recording Secretary
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Minutes of November 9, 1961
The meeting was called to order at 8:20 P.M., Chairman Kelley presiding.
Members present: Hill, Martin , Miles, Pershing, Rice, Kelley
Romans, Ex-officio
Members absent: None
Also present: Councilman Brownewell, ICRPC Representative McLucas.
Page 600
I. I.C.R.P.C. METRO GROWTH PLAN
Mr. McLucas stated that ICRPC had two objectives in view with the Metro Growth Plan. First,
to discuss with Planning Commissions the picture of the regional plan as developed to this
point, and secondly, to ask that the various metropolitan Planning Commissions adopt the
plan. It was the aim of ICRPC to have a plan to which all the districts in the metropolitan
area could adhere, and to have unity throughout the area. Mr. McLucas pointed out that any
proposals which were submitted to ICRPC for review and recommendation were in turn delegated
to the Development Review Board for their review. They are referred back to the Planning
Commission, and if ICRPC has ruled unfavorably upon the proposal, a 2 /3 vote of the local
Planning Commission is required to override ICRPC's decision.
Mr. Hill asked if the Commission was limited in the size of their referral. Mr. McLucas
replied that according to State Statute, anything concerning over 40 acres of residential
or 20 acres of commercial must be referred to ICRPC; however, ICRPC has placed no limit.
He did state that the Master Plan and any change in the Zoning Ordinance should be reviewed
by ICRPC; also, that before any changes are submitted, the regional plan as a whole should
be adopted.
Mr. McLucas explained the Community Develo~ment Areas, and indicated that on the map of
Englewood, the part of the city west of Santa Fe was · not included in the CDA, but the
Cherry Hills area was. He stated that this map did not represent zoning or general land use;
but did indicate the amount of land to be needed by this type of development with an
ultimate population of 50,000.
Mr. McLucas pointed out three major factors for consideration: Drainage, Density, Major
Services. He stated that his office was working on a possible answer to flood control; also
they were working on a mixed structure zone which could be applied to existing residential
developments or to vacant land.
Discussion followed. Mr. McLucas pointed out that the Metro Growth Plan was changeable and
flexible.
Mr. McLucas read the following certification and resolution prepared by ICRPC:
"CERTIFICATION
In accordance with Section 8, Article 2, Chapter 106, Colorado Revised Statutes of 1953 as
amended, the INTER-COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION hereby certifies to the Englewood
Planning Commission the Regional Plan of the Denver Metropolitan Area, embodied in tpe
publication entitled METRO GROWTH PLAN (Master Plan Report No. 16). Adoption of the Plan
is requested.
It is the understanding of the Regional Planning Commission that adoption of the Regional
Plan will mean that the adopting Commission will consider the Regional Plan as a guide in
making local plans, and that the adopting Commission will give particular attention to that
portion of the Regional Plan which directly affects the territory under the Commission's
jurisdiction and to the relationship of that portion to the balance of the Regional Plan.
Such adoption will not however in any way limit the authority of the adopting Commission as
set forth in city or county ordinances, resolutions, or regulations, or in state law, with
respect to planning, zoning, subdivision control, or any other function.
/s/ George Nez /s / Varian L. Ashbaugh
Executive Director Chairman
September 5, 1961 /s / Robert Wright
Date Secretary-Treasurer
RESOLUTION
In accordance with Section 8, Article 2, Chapter 106, Colorado Revised Statutes of 1953 as
amended, the Englewood Planning Commission hereby adopts the Regional Plan of the Denver
Metropolitan Area, embodied in the publication entitled METRO GROWTH PLAN (Master Plan
Report No. 16) of the INTER-COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION.
In so adopting the Plan, this Commission consurs with the understanding of the Regional
Planning Commission as set forth in its certification of the Plan dated September 5, 1961.
Secretary Chairman
Date"
He emphasized that this would not conflict with the present zoning or any proposed zoning
in Englewood or any other community. It was only to continue the system of referral of any
proposal for development.
Councilman Brownewell inquired as to the Council treatment of a metter on which both ICRPC
and the local Planning Commission agree, but Council did not. What would the vote need to
be to override the recommendation of ICRPC. It was pointed out that it takes 2 /3 vote of
Council to override a recommendation of the Planning Commission presently, thus it would
still require a 2 /3 vote of Council to override the recommendation.
Discussion followed.
Mr. Kelley thanked Mr. McLucas for his interesting presentation.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 601
II. APPROVAL OF MIN1J'IES
The Minutes of October 19, 1961, meeting were approved as printed.
- -- - ---~
III. MEMO FROM ARAPAHOE COUNTY
The Planning Director read a memo from Lee Woolsey, Arapahoe County Planning Director,
concerning zoning south of Belleview in the Brookridge Heights area. She also displayed
a plan of this area for the Commission's information. Mr. Kelley asked what authority
the Englewood Planning Commission had in this situation; and whether or not Englewood is
obligated to give an opinion in such matters. Mrs. Romans stated she knew ' of no obliga-
tion, but did feel that the multi-family zoning proposed in the area would have a definite
effect upon Englewood as the main traffic to and fr om the area would be on Broadway or
Logan.
Chairman Kelley requested Mrs. Romans to see if there was an existing agreement on such
matters between Englewood and other cities and the county.
IV. ENGLEWOOD UNLIMITED
Mrs. Romans informed the Commission members the date for the proposed meeting with City
Council, Englewood Unlimited, and the State Highway Department had been moved to November
27, 1961. She stated she had contacted interested members of Englewood Unlimited and the
State Highway Department, and the date was satisfactory to them. The Planning Commission
members indicated the change would be satisfactory to them also.
V. OLD BUSINESS
A. Franzmann-Folkerts
Mrs. Romans stated that she, Mr. Rust, Mr. Jones, Mr. Hammers, Mr. Folkerts, and Don
Franzmann met November 2, 1961 to discuss the situation in the 3200 block South Huron.
Mr. Don Franzmann and Mr. Hammers stated that they intended to purchase Mr. Folkerts'
property to develop it themselves. On the morning of November 3, 1961, Mrs. Romans
received a phone call from Mr. Hammers stating that Mr. Folkerts had sold his property to
someone else.
B. Gordon Tract
Mrs. Romans discussed a meeting held the evening of November 8, 1961, with residents of the
area south o f Union and east of Decatur. She reported the residents west o f Clay Street
extended will not object to M-1 east of Clay provided a strip of houses on Clay, facing
west, is used as a buffer. They do not want their property rezoned at this time.
C. R-3-C Formula
Mrs. Romans stated the formula had been sent to Planning Offices throughout the entire area,
and to Mr. Dennis O'Harrow, Executive Director, Planning Advisory Service. A letter had
been received from Mr. O'Ha rr ow stating the table derived fr om the formula seemed quite
logical. In a meeting with Mr. Herb Moore of Jefferson County, it was stated that Mr. Moore
felt development of single family residences should be discouraged. Mr. Joe Lacy, Grand
Junction City Manager, reported his engineer had found the formula as workable as any to
provide open . space in relation to height.
D. Subdivision Plats
Mrs. Romans stated there had been no further development of any of the proposed subdivisions;
Jensen, Raritan Industrial ·Park, or Carmel Park.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. ICRPC Information
Mrs. Romans brought out the point that no information from ICRPC reaches her of fice. She
further stated that she felt the representative and alternate from the City of Englewood
to ICRPC should be the Planning Commission Chairman and the Planning Director --whomsoever
they might be. This way the Planning Off ice would be aware of information ICRPC is pro-
viding. Discussion followed.
B. Annexation
Mrs. Romans stated she had been contacted by a gentleman who wished to have ·his property
south of Belleview at approximately Cherokee annexed. His property is approximately 100'
x 300'. He wants to be served by the Englewood Water System, and could not be any other
way.
Chairman Kelley stated he felt annexing a portion of that size and breaking over the boundary
for such was unwise.
Meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Gertrude G. Welty
Recording Secretary
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *