Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-08-05 PZC MINUTES• • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING C01\11\11SSION AUGUST 5, 1997 I. CALL TO ORDER. The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 7 :00 P.M. in the Englewood City Council Chambers, Chairman Douglas presiding. Members Present: Tobin, Weber, Welker, Cottle, Dummer, Garrett, Homer, Douglas Ex-officio Simpson (departed early for another meeting) Members Absent: Styes Also Present: Harold J. Stitt, Planning Coordinator Nancy Reid, Assistant City Attorney Brad Denning, Planning Assistant Intern II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. July 22, 1997 Chairman Douglas stated that the Minutes of July 22, 1997 were to be considered for approval . Homer moved: Tobin seconded: The Minutes of July 22, 1997 be approved as written. AYES: NAYS: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Weber, Welker, Dummer, Homer, Douglas None Cottle, Garrett, Tobin Sty es The motion carried. ID. SOUTH SUBURBAN PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT Cornerstone Park PD Amendment CASE #PD-97-01 Mr. Douglas stated that the Public Hearing is regarding a proposed amendment to the Planned Development for Cornerstone Park. Mr. Douglas asked for a motion to open the Public Hearing. Tobin moved: Welker seconded: The Public Hearing on PD #97-01 be opened . 1 AYES: NAYS: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Welker, Cottle, Dummer, Garrett, Homer, Tobin, Weber, Douglas None None Sty es The motion carried. Mr. Douglas stated that the Planning Commission will address only land use issues during the course of the Public Hearing on the proposed Planned Development amendment. He asked that members of the audience present to testify on this case please keep their remarks focused on the land use issue. Mr. Douglas asked that staff make their presentation. Harold Stitt was sworn in, and testified that the Planned Development was approved in 1993 upon application by the South Suburban Parks & Recreation District to develop what is now known as "Cornerstone Park". This site, comprised of 66.5 acres in total, encompasses the former Arapahoe County Fairgrounds and the former South Drive-In Theater site on the north side of West Belleview A venue. However, the proposed PD amendment focuses on the south- east comer of the park that lies south of West Belleview A venue and west of South Hickory Street. The zoning for this site is B-2, Business, and R-3, High Density Residence. Both zone districts allow parks as a permitted use as a "public facility." Mr. Stitt testified that the Planned Development was approved in 1993. In 1996, the Compre- • hensive Zoning Ordinance was amended, and the Planned Development regulations were re-• pealed and replaced with a Planned Unit Development District. Within the PUD regulations there is a statement that amendments to Planned Developments approved prior to the PUD en- actment shall be considered under the Planned Development guidelines that were in effect at the time of initial approval. The requested amendment to the 1993 PD will add two sports venues to the southeast comer of the park, provide additional parking, informational kiosks, and small shelters. The sports venues proposed are two in-line hockey rinks, and one skate park. Also to be added are four information kiosks, four shelters without restrooms, and 107 additional parking spaces. Mr. Stitt cited standards the Commission must consider in reviewing a Planned Development or amendment thereto, and addressed the compliance of the proposal with these standards. Mr. Stitt stated that the proposed sports venue additions do not change the character of the Park. Mr. Stitt testified that the traffic circulation patterns will not change inasmuch as only an expansion of an approved parking lot is proposed. The in-line hockey and skate park are situated to minimize impacts on the residential uses; there will be small scale structures in conjunction with these sports venues, and there will be landscape screening to the south and east of the recreational venues. Mr. Stitt pointed out that the parking lot on the southeast por- tion of the Park was included on the original PD approved in 1993. The point of access to the parking lot will not change, but the configuration will change to accommodate the additional spaces. Mr. Stitt testified that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance does not specifically ad- dress the minimum required parking for a Park or recreational use. The City typically allows • applicants to present standards they feel are appropriate to the use proposed. In this case, 2 • • • South Suburban has cited standards presently used by Douglas County , which are .5 spaces per individual. Mr. Stitt pointed out that the park is adjacent to residential use in Littleton on three sides ; the applicants will plant extensive landscaping to buffer the park use from the residential development . Mr. Stitt noted that the location of the proposed in-line hockey and skate park is approximately 150 feet west and 20 feet above South Hickory Street. The Park is being devel- oped as a handicapped accessible facility . There is no bicycle/pedestrian trail system through the Park; however , there are trails along the perimeter . Eventual plans call for the connection of the bicycle/pedestrian trails with existing trail systems along Big Dry Creek. Mr. Stitt stated that the natural drainage flows of the site have been maintained , the majority use is open space with very few structures (shelters and kiosks ). Mr. Stitt stated that staff does recommend approval of the proposed Planned Development amendment. He asked if the Commission members had questions of him. Mr. Garrett asked for clarification on the location of the additional parking spaces. Mr. Stitt cited parking areas with figures as approved in 1993 and the proposed spaces in the amend- ment , noting a net gain of 107 spaces . The bulk of the additional parking spaces will be lo- cated in the southeast quadrant of the Park. Mr. Garrett asked that the new shelters be identified. Mr. Stitt complied. Mr. Douglas asked if notice of the Public Hearing was given. Mr. Stitt submitted Notice of Public Hearing which was published in the Englewood Herald on July 24 , 1997, and the Certi- fication of Posting for the site . Mr. Stitt also entered into the record copies of letters received from Frank and Kathryn Holland, 5304 South Datura Street, Littleton; from Bernard A. and Linda Lee Funk, 5323 South Datura Street , Littleton; and a letter/petition submitted by David L. and Ruth 0. Hansen , 4511 South Galapago Street, Englewood. Mr. Stitt stated that the letters submitted by Mr. and Mrs . Holland , and by Mr. and Mrs. Funk, express concerns re- garding the proposed recreational additions to the Park. The letter/petition submitted by Mr. and Mrs . Hansen address fees charged Englewood residents who use facilities in Cornerstone Park even though the Park is located within the limits of Englewood . Mr. Stitt emphasized that this issue may not be addressed by the Commission; it must be negotiated by the South Suburban Board of Directors with the Englewood City Council. Mr. Brett Collins , Senior Planner for South Suburban Park & Recreation District, was sworn in. Mr. Collins introduced Mr. David Stipe , Planner , and Ms. Joanne Gould, Program Ad- ministrator for the District. He noted that these individuals have worked closely on the devel- opment of the master plan for Cornerstone Park. David Stipe , Planner with South Suburban , was sworn in. Mr. Stipe testified that since the approval of the Planned Development for the Park in 1993 , the recreational needs of the people around the Park, and others using the Park, have changed. The revised Plan addresses the needs and desires that have been made known to South Suburban officials. Mr. Stipe noted that shelters proposed in the original PD have been decreased in size , but there are more shel- ters -the net result is no decrease or increase in square footage devoted to shelters, but a 3 greater number of shelters . Mr. Stipe located the shelters on the plan for the Commission. Mr. Stipe stated that the additional informational kiosks are needed to disseminate information on the programs offered , and location of specific activities to the users of the Park. Mr. Stipe then addressed the in-line hockey rinks and the skate park proposed for the southeast sector of the Park. In October , 1995 , a public meeting was held to discuss the addition of these two sports venues to the Park; the meeting was advertised , but was not well attended. Those who did attend the public meeting had the opportunity to voice their opinions and concerns on the proposed PD amendment . The in-line hockey rinks and skate park will provide an opportunity to youngsters , and to adults , to do their in-line hockey and skateboarding in an approved loca- tion. Currently , youngsters who want to skate are chased off private property, out of parking lots for malls , churches , and other places of business. Skating in the public streets is not ac- ceptable , either . Mr. Stipe stated that the hockey rinks and skate park will be lighted -probably about 20 foot high lights similar to those used for tennis courts . There should not be light spreading into adjacent homes. All South Suburban parks are open from dawn to 11 P.M . The skate park will be of concrete construction , and will be sunken so that the majority of the bowl is below grade ; it will have a walkway around the lip of the bowl for spectators, and for the skaters to use in conjunction with their activity. There is no fee proposed for use of either the rinks or skate park; however , there may be some programs and clinics scheduled for which there will be a fee charged . Mr. Stipe estimated that during scheduled programs , they anticipate 35 users of the rinks/skate park . There will be programs and clinics scheduled approximately 30% of the time. Mr. Stipe acknowledged they do expect some increase in the amount of traffic generated by the new sports venues . To accommodate the increased Park usage , they have provided an overall increase of 107 parking spaces from the original Planned Development. Mr. Stipe noted that not all the parking spaces will be constructed at once; the parking lots will be developed as needed , but the areas must be designated for parking on the plan so that the specific area will be not developed or landscaped and have to be cleared before the parking lot can be con- structed . Mr. Stipe stated that the District officials feel this is an exciting change, and that they will be providing two new facilities that are needed. Ms . Tobin asked if the hockey rinks and skate park will be restricted to children. Mr. Stipe stated they will not be restricted . Mr . Welker asked what activities were proposed for this area in the original Planned Devel- opment . Mr. Stipe stated that senior activities had been proposed for this area; they have been relocated to the west closer to the community building. Senior activities will include shuffle- board courts , lawn bowlirig courts , a croquet lawn , and horseshoe pits. Mr . Welker asked if there is a net loss or gain in vegetation. Mr. Stipe stated that any loss will be compensated with increased density of plantings. 4 • • • Mr. Welker asked if the in-line hockey rinks will be "depressed" as will be the skate park. Mr. Stipe stated that the hockey rinks will be at-grade; they propose to have netting at the end of the rinks to catch the balls used by the hockey players (pucks are not used for in-line hockey). Mr. Welker asked how motorists and pedestrians on the street and sidewalk would be protected from the balls hit out of the rink. Mr. Stipe reiterated that fencing is proposed only at the ends of the rinks. Mr. Welker questioned the lighting proposed, and what controls will be in place. Mr. Stipe stated that the parking lot lights will be on until the Park closes at 11 P .M.; lights on the fields will be on while activities are scheduled. Mr. Welker inquired about security in the Park. Mr. Stipe stated that the Park is policed; South Suburban employs "park rangers" who do the policing. Mr. Stipe noted that the District has a strict graffiti removal policy -if anything is tagged, the graffiti must be removed within 48 hours. Mr. Stipe commented that he has discussed the issue of skate parks and in-line hockey rinks with other officials throughout the state and, indeed, throughout the country; their comments are that the "kids police themselves"; they take pride in "their" facility and don't want it trashed or damaged. Mr. Welker asked about provisions for spectators during programmed events. Mr. Stipe stated that there is a small "bleacher" area for the hockey rinks; they can provide temporary seating for the skating clinics. • Mr. Welker inquired about concession stands. Mr. Stipe stated that no concession stands are proposed. • Ms. Cottle asked if the courts are already in place. Mr. Stipe stated they are not; the District must follow a budget process; next year they propose to accomplish quite a bit of paving, at least one of the in-line hockey rinks and maybe the skate park. Ms. Cottle asked if the District had reviewed previous use of the site. Mr. Stipe stated that he is aware there was an ice arena on part of the site, with a horse track and stables in the center and north portion of the site. They have done test borings at numerous locations, and have found concrete and asphalt debris from dumping that occurred over the years; the District has removed this debris when it has been located. Mr. Homer inquired about the entry into the Park from Hickory. Mr. Stitt stated that the point of entry from South Hickory has not changed from the original PD proposal. Ms. Tobin inquired about policing provisions for the safety of youngsters in the Park; she noted that parks attract pedophiles. Mr. Stipe again referenced their use of park rangers. Ms. Tobin asked if the rangers had a regular patrol through the Park. Mr. Stipe stated he could not address the "regularity" of their patrol. 5 Ms. Tobin asked whether the District had a policy regarding use of radios by Park visitors. Mr. Stipe stated that this has been discussed, but radios are allowed. Ms. Tobin commented that many people object to the volume of the radios. Ms. Cottle asked about telephones within the Park. Mr. Stipe stated that there will be pay phones or courtesy phones at kiosks and/or shelters. They have a pay phone at the miniature golf course. He suggested that emergency phones may be incorporated into the kiosks. Mr. Welker commented that kids ride bicycles, and asked if there was a plan to have more walkways or bicycle trails. Mr. Stipe stated that they will have four foot walkways on the south side of the park, which can be extended from the southeast entrance point further north along South Hickory. Mr. Welker stated that he would like to see this added. Mr. Garrett asked how the build-out for the parking related to the build-out of the hockey and skating areas. How many parking spaces are estimated for these two uses. Mr. Stipe esti- mated that 37 parking spaces would be required for both the hockey rink and skate park. Mr. Douglas stated that he understood the lights will be on until the Park closes; he asked for verification on the closing time. Mr. Stipe stated that the Park closes at 11 P.M., and opens at dawn. Ms. Sandra Johnson, 5250 South Huron Way #11-205, was sworn in. Ms. Johnson testified that she lives right across the street from the proposed sports development. She stated that Cornerstone Park is a "beautiful Park", but the idea of lighting and traffic at the Park until 11 P.M. disturbs her. Ms. Johnson stated that she is not bothered by the existing lighting, but noted that this development is much closer to her residence, and is concerned. She suggested that even if the lights are focused "downward", she cannot star watch from her balcony. Leigh Dehne, 5250 South Huron Way #2-310, was sworn in. He testified that he is a school bus driver for Littleton Public Schools, and has been so employed for four years. Mr. Dehne suggested that "you are setting a dangerous precedent" when you have large groups of young- sters in the Park without adult supervision. He noted that kids get into fights, do drugs, do graffiti. Mr. Dehne cited Benedict Park in Brighton, and noted that there is considerable graf- fiti and vandalism in this skate park. Mr. Dehne stated that he is sure South Suburban has "good intentions" and would be less concerned if there was some way to provide the adult su- pervision. He suggested that a fee be imposed for use of the facilities to pay for an adult to oversee the rinks and skate park. Mr. Dehne stated that these facilities are dangerous, and there will be users that are injured; there must be someone present to provide assistance. Mr. Dehne noted that a few years ago, one of the tennis courts in Belleview Park was turned into a skateboard area complete with ramp, but it was not very successful and the skateboard area has been removed. Mr. Dehne emphasized that the decisions Englewood makes regarding this Park will affect people who live in Littleton. Mr. Dehne stated that he is opposed to this pro- posed development -he is opposed to this plan. 6 • • • • • • Ms. Tobin asked if Mr. Dehne felt it was safer for youngsters to try skating in parking lots or on streets. Mr. Dehne acknowledged that it is no safer; he reiterated the need for adult super- vision, and also advocated that the hockey rinks and skate park be located in . an industrial area so they do not impact residential uses. Eddie Hix, 6253 South Prescott, was sworn in. Mr. Hix offered his testimony from the per- spective of a teenage skater -there is a need for this skate park and the hockey rinks. The young people have no place to skate where the property owners or business people aren't op- posed to it and chase them off. He stated that he has gone to the Boulder skate park and it is a good park, but it's not close by. Mr. Hix stated that he thinks people from all over the metro area and State will use the skate park, and that it could attract skate groups from other states. This facility will keep kids off the streets, and it will be good for the kids to have a location they can go to. Mr. Hix noted that Boulder charges a $5 fee. Mr. Hix stated that he does not think there will be a problem with graffiti, that people "don't want to mess up where they skate"; skaters do not use drugs -they are interested in staying in good health. Ms. Joanne Gould was sworn in. Ms. Gould works with South Suburban, and stated that the in-line hockey and skate parks will be part of the existing programs offered by the District. Mr. Dummer asked if there will be open skating when programs and clinics are not scheduled . Ms. Gould stated that the rinks and skate park will be open for the same period of time the Park is open; restrictions would apply only for the period of time when clinics or programs are scheduled. Ms. Gould suggested that the Englewood skateboard use in Belleview Park was discontinued because of injury concerns ; she stated that she has run in-line hockey for over one year with no injuries. Participants are required to wear pads and helmets; pucks are not al- lowed -participants use balls instead. Ms . Gould suggested that most of the problems are with the "image" of hockey players and skateboarders. Ms . Gould stated that there is a civic duty to provide locations for youngsters who want to skate. Mr. Douglas expressed his concern regarding lack of adult attendants/supervisors. Ms. Gould stated that during all clinics and scheduled programs, there will be adult supervisors; there will not be such service during the open skating times. She pointed out that there are many activi- ties occurring in the park for which there is no adult supervision. She supported providing an emergency phone system in the Park. Ms. Gould commented that the Boulder skate park is one of the few skate parks that provide adult staff. Mr . Garrett asked for clarification on lighting: when will the rinks and skate park be lighted, and when will the lights be off. Ms. Gould stated that the Park closes at 11 P.M.; they try to assure that scheduled activities end at 10 P.M. Ms. Gould stated that programs for in-line hockey will run March through October. Ms. Tobin inquired if there is a curfew for youngsters in Littleton. Ms. Gould stated that she could not answer that . 7 Ms. Cottle asked if a fee could be charged if an attendant is required. Ms. Gould stated that fees can be charged; she pointed out that they will need to research this to determine the finan- cial feasibility of charging fees to pay for attendants. Mr: Garrett asked what activities would be scheduled in the skate park. Ms. Gould suggested that skating demonstrations, clinics, rodeos, and promotions could be scheduled. Ms. Gould pointed out that skating is a "free routine" for the individual skaters, and she doesn 't anticipate many programmed activities. Mr. Stipe stated that , in his opinion, the lights in the skate park itself would seldom be on, and certainly not on an every evening basis . Mr. Welker asked whether the proposed skate park will be comparable in size to the Boulder skate park. Mr. Stipe stated that the Englewood skate park will be considerably larger. He stated that Boulder allows about 50 skaters at a time in a 3 ,500 square foot area; he also under- stands that Boulder is planning construction of a second skate park. Mr. Welker asked how South Suburban has arrived at the average of 35 skate park users at any one time. Mr. Stipe stated he has had discussions with skate park operators throughout the country, and this figure was derived from information gleaned from those discussions. Mr. Stipe commented that Parker is also designing a skate park. He emphasized that the Dis- trict has to keep accessibility for skaters in mind in looking for locations for skate parks. He • stated that the District has looked at building a second skate park in the eastern part of the • District; however, the sites are not within established parks or on District-owned property. Mr. Stipe stated that South Suburban wants to develop something that the skaters can be proud of, and related that in Grand Junction the skaters joined in cleaning up the site during and after construction, and have an "ownership" in the skate park. Mr. Stipe stated that the District feels this is a perfect location for a skate park, and that Arapahoe County Sheriff Sullivan is supportive of a skate park development . He stated that the District has written a grant pro- posal with Mobile Pre-Mix for development of the skate park. They want to make the skate park a safe, accessible, and affordable venue for the skaters. Mr . Stipe noted that "kids take care of each other", but acknowledged that the District must provide the opportunity to get help if it is needed, and this would be accomplished with the provision of pay phones through- out the Park. Mr. Stipe commented that many parks do not have attendants. Ms. Tobin commented on discussions she has had with some youngsters who have frequented Cornerstone Park, and they have indicated that there is gang activity in the Park. Ms. Tobin reiterated her opinion on the need for security checks by park police or rangers on a regular basis. Cord Hashbarger, 5555 South Elmwood Street, was sworn in. Mr. Hashbarger, a teenager, testified to the need for a skate park, and that "kids get kicked off private sites and cops write tickets". He stated that he has visited Cushing Park but didn't feel the skating facilities were very good and the Park is always very busy. • 8 • Jim Hix, 6253 South Prescott, was sworn in. Mr. Hix stated that he has driven a number of the youngsters who like to skate to Boulder; he stated that the kids who frequent the skate parks are very well behaved, and teach each other how to rollerblade. Mr. Hix stated that is a pleasure to be around these youngsters. Jennifer Loeser, 5301 South Hickory Street, was sworn in. Ms. Loeser expressed concern about smaller youngsters who may want to skate; if there is no provision for proper supervi- sion the small kids might get hurt. She noted that Mr. Stipe mentioned that the District con- sidered sites for a second park; would this location be as closely situated to a residential area as the Cornerstone site. Why is Cornerstone Park the first choice for a skate park rather than some other location; if there aren't as many residential uses around it why not put the skate park at the second location. Ms. Loeser also discussed the impact of late night lighting; she stated that she thinks 11 P. M. is a little late to have the lights on to accommodate skaters. There will be light pollution and noise pollution from the use of the park, all of which will ad- versely impact the residents along Hickory Street. Mr. Douglas asked what problems Ms. Loeser might foresee with no attendant on-site. Ms. Loeser suggested that skaters could be injured, get into fights, there could be drinking by skat- ers , and possibly other undesirable activities. Ms. Loeser noted that skateboarding is a high risk activity, and if there are injuries will the liability belong to the District or to the C ity . Ms. Loeser also suggested that an attendant could determine if the skate park area was too crowded at any one time, and control the use of the area. • Karen Nyhop, 5318 South Foresthill Street , was sworn in. Ms. Nyhop testified that the pres- ent atmosphere of the Park is family-oriented, and the unsupervised skate park is of concern to her . Also the skate park and hockey rinks are in close proximity to the residential neighbor- hoods , and she is concerned about the noise from these activities. • Don Girard , 5301 South Hickory Street, was sworn in. Mr. Girard testified that he is a new resident, having moved into his home over this past weekend. He is concerned about the lighted parking lots. If there is nothing planned for the skating area, and it 's 8:30 to 9:00 P .M ., will the skating areas still be lighted? What size are the trees and shrubs that are pro- posed for the landscaping. Mr. Girard stated that he has no problem with the concept of the skate park and hockey rinks; his problem is with the organization and location of these pro- posed activity centers, which is adjacent to the heaviest residential area. The lighting is of major concern; he noted that the lighted parking lots will be right along the boundary of the park close to his home. Mr. Girard asked what South Suburban plans to do with the existing trees that are in this immediate area; will they be removed , or trimmed. What time will the lights be turned off if nothing is planned for the skating areas . Mr. Weber asked Mr . Girard if there are street lights along Prentice Avenue. He noted that street lights are closer to residential uses and higher than the parking lot lights shown on the plans . Mr. Girard stated there are no street lights along Prentice Avenue . He reiterated that the skate park and hockey rinks are right next to the residential areas . 9 Upon questioning, Mr. Girard acknowledged that he knew there was a Park across the street when he purchased his property, but that it was an "open space park"; he thought it might have .- some further development but did not realize that this would include skating areas, or that a parking lot would be right across the street. Mr. Girard commented that there are a lot of soc- cer fields, and suggested that the skate park and hockey rinks might be relocated. Eddie Hix again addressed the Commission, and asked that they keep in mind the majority of the skaters using the skate park will be kids; parents don 't want them out after 10 P.M.; a lot of kids also work and they want to be home and in bed at a reasonable hour . Mr. Hix pointed out that there is a curfew in Littleton: Friday and Saturday nights it is 12 Midnight; Sunday through Thursday nights it is 11 :00 P.M. John Spencer, 5250 South Huron Way #10-206 , was sworn in. Mr. Spencer testified that he knows what kids are like , and pointed out that his condominium is right across the street from the proposed skate park/hockey rinks . Mr. Spencer stated that there have been several break- ins , cars have been "ripped off', and other forms of vandalism have occurred since the Park has been open. Mr. Spencer emphasized the need for some kind of regular policing policy in the Park, and echoed the sentiment that this has been a "family park", but predicted that the skate park/hockey rink additions will make it more of a "teenage hang-out". Mr. Douglas pointed out that there is a loitering ordinance in Englewood, as well as a noise ordinance. If adjacent residents experience these problems, they should call the Englewood Police to register complaints . Mr . Spencer also discussed the lighting, noting that the condominiums on South Hickory are three story ; even if there is berming or the lighting is directed downward , it will still impact those residents whose units are on the second or third floors. Kathy Breen, 5250 South Huron Way , #6-205 , was sworn in. Ms. Breen expressed concern regarding increased traffic , and the congestion at the intersection of West Belleview Avenue and South Hickory Street. Ms. Breen also suggested that youngsters will walk home from the Park, and walk through private yards rather than follow sidewalks. Mr. Douglas recalled Mr. Stipe to the podium , and asked that the issue of existing trees on the Park site be addressed. Mr. Stipe stated that the District has removed a number of old Siberian Elm trees , and there are quite a few Siberian Elms remaining. A lot of trees are under power lines and Public Service Company periodically cuts them back, however the PSC employees are not "tree surgeons " and the trees are not shaped or properly trimmed . He stated that the District will try to preserve the trees that are healthy. Mr. Stipe stated that when the District plants new trees , they do not plant under the power lines; also the trees will not be 20 feet in height , but will be 2 " to 3 " caliper in size . Mr. Stipe reiterated that the lights for the parking lots will be on until 11 P.M. when the Park • closes. He pointed out that the original Planned Development approved in 1993 indicated a • parking lot in the southeast comer, so this amendment is not imposing a new parking lot, just a 10 • • • reconfiguration. The lighting will be "down lighting", and that non-glare bulbs are available. Mr. Stipe stated that he cannot speak to the specific type of lighting that will be used. He stated that he does not anticipate that the lights on the hockey rinks and skate park will be on every evening, the lights "could" be on until 11 P.M. Mr. Stipe addressed the_ safety issue, noting that the District will fence the skate park for security and safety reasons. Park rangers open and close the Park on a dawn to 11 P .M . schedule, and the District doesn't want anyone wandering cross the park at 2 A.M. Mr. Stipe again described the skate park, noting that there will be a "sunken bowl " with a concrete perimeter for spectators and skaters to descend from into the bowl. Mr . Welker inquired about the height of the parking lot lights. He asked if Mr. Stipe had no specific information on the foot candle rating of these lights. Mr. Welker also asked if consid- eration had been given to providing buffering of the parking area by construction of a berm or fencing. Mr. Stipe stated there will be some berming, but the majority will use the natural grade of the park. Mr. Welker asked why the proposed hockey rinks and skate park were not placed to the north along Belleview Avenue. Mr. Stipe discussed the portion of the Park that has already been developed, the intent to keep automobile traffic on the periphery of the Park, and noted location of utility easements which also inhibit location of improvements. Taking all facets into consideration, the southeast sector of the Park was yet undeveloped, and the hockey rinks and skate park could be placed there without tearing out improvements or encroaching into easements. Ms. Cottle asked what other parks the District has considered for location of these sports ac- tivities. Mr. Stipe stated that only Cornerstone Park has the space available to accommodate these uses ; furthermore , the other sites the District has viewed would require land acquisition as well as development costs. Mr. Douglas asked what construction is currently occurring at Cornerstone Park. Mr. Stipe stated that the "Tot-Lot " has just been completed, and they will begin work on some of the shelters very soon. Fill dirt and top soil is being brought in; grading for the hockey rinks had begun, but was stopped to accommodate the process to amend the PD. Mr. Homer inquired who the contractor firm is that the District has hired. Mr. Stipe stated that RBI has done some work. Mr. Homer asked if RBI has any contracts with the District now. Mr. Stipe stated that they have some bids in, but all contractors have been notified they will not be pursuing further construction until approval of the PD amendment is obtained. Mr. Homer stated that it appears the primary change on the PD is from passive recreation to active recreation venues. Mr. Stipe agreed. Mr. Dehne again addressed the Commission, asking the height of fencing around the skate park. Mr. Stipe responded that the District is not in the final design stages for the skate park; he stated that in his opinion, the fence would be more than three feet in height, and probably no more than six feet . 11 Mr. Douglas asked if anyone else wished to address the Commission. No one indicated a de- sire to speak. Horner moved: Cottle seconded: The Public Hearing on Case #PD-97-01 be closed. AYES: NAYS: Cottle, Dummer, Garrett, Horner, Tobin, Weber, Welker, Douglas None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Sty es The motion carried. *********** A brief recess was declared. The meeting reconvened at 9:24 P.M., eight members of the Commission present. ********** Mr. Douglas asked the pleasure of the Commission. Weber moved: Tobin seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council that amendment of the Planned Development granted to South Suburban Park & Recrea- tion District for development of Cornerstone Park be approved. Mr. Welker stated that he understands why the District chose to construct the skate park and hockey rinks in the southeast quadrant of the Park; he stated that he isn't 100% in agreement with the location, but understands that the District did not want -and could not afford -to change construction that is already completed. Mr. Welker stated that he thinks there should be such a facility in the area for skaters to use. However, the District should take steps to mitigate the impact on the surrounding residential area. Mr. Welker suggested that lights from vehicles driven into or out of the parking lot will have a greater impact on residential uses than the stationary lighting in the parking lots and on the skating areas, and that "cars have more impact than people." • • Mr. Weber pointed out that the location of the parking lot was not changed. Mr. Welker agreed the location was not changed, but the size has increased. He advocated use of berms and fencing to shield adjacent residential areas from headlight intrusion; he stated that he doesn't want to see six foot high fencing around the parking area, but does want to see some- thing done to reduce or eliminate the impact of the headlights. Mr. Welker reiterated that, in his opinion, the impact from the lighting in the skating area will not be that great. He ex- pressed displeasure and concern that this will be an unsupervised activity. Ms. Tobin sug- gested that this may change once the skate areas are open for use. Mr. Welker stated that he is • 12 • • • still concerned that they do not plan adult supervision up-front; he reiterated that he really be- lieves such a facility is necessary, but the need for supervision should be addressed by the District. Discussion ensued. Mr . Dummer commented that the overall increase in parking spaces, and the increase/reconfiguration of the southeast parking area, is not related per se to the skate ac- tivity developments , but to overall use of the Park. He also suggested that programmed activi- ties may be more adult-oriented than youngster-oriented. Mr. Garrett addressed the lighting concerns, and questioned whether restrictions could be im- posed that the lights could not be on in evenings if use of the skate areas was not scheduled or programmed. If activities are not "scheduled" or "programmed" for the skate areas, this might also reduce the number of vehicles that may be using the parking area in the evening. Discussion ensued. Mr. Welker suggested this is one reason he wants to see the "down- lighting" for the activity areas and parking lots. He suggested that the Commission consider imposing a condition on the approval that the lighting be controlled; also could the Commis- sion impose a condition that the Park will not be open after 10 P.M. Assistant City Attorney Reid suggested that imposing hour restrictions is not a land-use issue, but if the Commission felt they could tie the hour impositions to an impact reduction they could consider it. Ms. Cottle suggested that a six foot fence, with locking gates, be required around the skate park. She suggested that South Suburban needs to consider some program to have a regular patrol service through the Park. Assistant City Attorney Reid suggested that the fence re- quirement is a safety/land use issue; however, patrols is a law enforcement issue and not within the parameters of the Commission. Mr. Welker commented that he regards hours of operation and security as part of land use considerations. Ms. Tobin stated that she is very concerned about the safety of patrons using all Parks, and emphasized the need for Parks to be patrolled. Ms. Tobin also noted that there are a number of programs, activities, and areas for senior citizens, but very little in the way of activities for youngsters in the eight to 14 age group. She stated there is a need for some activities for the youngsters in this age group. Mr. Welker agreed, but emphasized the need to take steps to protect the community surround- ing the Park. He noted the concentration of park facilities in this immediate area -Belleview Park in Englewood, Progress Park in Littleton, and Cornerstone Park in Englewood but devel- oped by South Suburban -which makes this a wonderful recreation area. He stated he shares the concern of an audience member regarding the intersection of West Belleview A venue and South Hickory Street, and the need for traffic control at that intersection. South Windermere Street is also a heavily used street, and traffic volume will increase. Additional discussion ensued . 13 Mr. Horner stated that he is a landscape architect, employed by RBI. As an employee of a contractor doing work on the Park, he will not participate in discussion or decision regarding the proposed amendment. Ms. Cottle stated that she wanted to suggest provision for additional pedestrian traffic from the southeast corner to the interior trail system. Mr. Welker agreed. The Commission determined that the motion should be amended to include the following con- dition and recommendations for the developer: CONDITION 1: The skate park shall be surrounded by a minimum six-foot high fence, with locking gates. RECOMMENDATION 1. Improve and provide additional pedestrian access from the south- east corner of the Park to the internal path system, with defined crosswalks and sidewalks. RECOMMENDATION 2: Impact of vehicle headlights on surrounding residential uses shall be mitigated by use of grading, berms, or other means to prevent intrusion of the headlights on the residential uses. RECOMMENDATION 3: An in-depth consideration of lighting specifications for the parking lots and skating areas be undertaken, addressing issues such as height of standards, deflection • of light rays downward, foot-candle rating of bulbs. A lighting plan encompassing this infor-• mation, as a minimum, shall be prepared and presented to City Council for their consideration at the time the amended PD is referred to Council. Ms . Cottle asked if the Commission could require a traffic study. Ms. Reid pointed that the Park is surrounded by streets that are in the City of Littleton, the City of Englewood, and a State Highway. A coordinated traffic study may be desirable but might not be feasible in the near future . Mr. Stitt stated that a traffic study was done in 1993 prior to initial consideration of the Planned Development. Mr. Weber and Ms. Tobin accepted the proposed amendments to the motion, which now reads: Weber moved: Tobin seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council that amendment of the Planned Development granted to South Suburban Park & Recrea- tion District for development of Cornerstone Park be approved with the following condition, and recommendations for the developer: CONDITION 1: The skate park shall be surrounded by a minimum six- foot high fence, with locking gates . 14 • • • • AYES: NAYS: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: RECOMMENDATION 1. Improve and provide additional pedestrian access from the southeast comer of the Park to the internal path system, with defined crosswalks and sidewalks. RECOMMENDATION 2: Impact of vehicle headlights on surrounding residential uses shall be mitigated by use of grading, berms, or other means to prevent intrusion of the headlights on the residential uses. RECOMMENDATION 3: An in-depth consideration of lighting specifi- cations for the parking lots and skating areas be undertaken, addressing issues such as height of standards, deflection of light rays downward , foot-candle rating of bulbs. A lighting plan encompassing this informa- tion, as a minimum, shall be prepared and presented to City Council for their consideration at the time the amended PD is referred to Council. Dummer , Garrett , Tobin , Weber , Welker , Cottle, Douglas None Homer Sty es The motion carried. IV. FINDINGS OF FACT 3183 South Race Street 3084 West Radcliff Drive 4737 South Fox Street 1015 West Stanford Place CU-97-03 cu 97-04 cu 97-05 cu 97-06 Mr. Douglas stated that the Findings of Fact on the four home-daycare cases were to be con- sidered. Homer moved: Welker seconded: The Findings of Fact for Case #CU-97-03 , CU-97-04, CU-97-05 , and CU-97-06 be approved as written. AYES : NAYS: ABSTAIN: ABSENT : Homer , Weber , Welker, Dummer, Douglas None Tobin , Cottle , Garrett Sty es The motion carried . 15 V. PUBLIC FORUM. Mr. Dehne stated he had a question on procedure that will be followed on the PD amendment. Mr. Douglas noted that the Public Hearing is closed, but that Mr. Dehne may confer with As- sistant City Attorney Reid at any time. No one else addressed the commission. VI. DIRECTOR'S CHOICE. Mr. Stitt stated that no cases are scheduled for the meeting on August 19th; however, discus- sion of the Planning Commissioner 's Handbook is on the agenda . He asked that members please bring their copies of the Handbook to that meeting. Mr. Stitt noted that Ms . Cottle , Mr. Douglas , Mr. Weber, and Mr. Welker attended and graduated from the Lakewood Citizens Planning Academy in April . The City Council will recognize these members for their participation at the City Council meeting on August 18 th ; the aforecited members were asked to please attend the City Council meeting at 7 :30 P .M. that evemng. VII. COMMISSIONER'S CHOICE. • Mr. Welker stated there is a group of citizens considering artwork which may be included in • the light rail station; they are soliciting suggestions, and have $35 ,000 allocated to accomplish this project. Mr. Welker noted that citizens who have participated on Englewood, Focusing on Tomorrow (EFOT), the Planning Commission, and other groups are involved in the project. The meeting adjourned . A~.L~~~ Gertrude G. Welty , Recording Secretary \n bd\grouplboards\plancommlminutes 97\pcm 08-97a.doc 16 •