HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964-10-21 PZC MINUTESI
I
I
Others Present:
Action Committee Members:
Jack Eachon
Ray Ludwig
Edward Draper
Robert Close
Leo Lentsch
Nate Burt
Rev. Stowell Sandmeyer
John Jameson
C. V. Coleman
City Manager Dial
City Attorney Esch
City Engineer Waggoner
Planning Directo r Romans
Page 805
Commission members Parkinson and Carlson and Councilman John Kreiling entered the meeting
and were seated later.
Mayor Love reviewed rather briefly the function of the Citizens' Action Committee and the
very key role it has played in developing plans to improve the traffic situation within
the Core Area. It wa s primarily at the requ est of the Commi t tee that the firm of Small-
Cooley & Associates was retained by the City Council to analyze our traffic problems in
the Core Area and to make recommendations as to the most feasible plans for correcting these
problems. Mayor Love went on to explain that the Traffic Consultant's report has been de-
layed somewhat by the decision on the part of the New Englewood Company, at the request of
several local businessmen and the Action Committee to construct their proposed shopping
complex to the west and adjoining the present Core Area rather than on the site known as
the KLZ property. The area within which New Englewood would be constructed is now used as
a park and a commercial golf course.
Mr. Love explained that an earlier meeting of the Planning Commission, City Council and
Action Committee wh ich had been set to review the Traffic Report with Mr. Small and Mr.
Tessler of Small-Cooley and Associates, had not been well attended because of a conflict
in time. Therefore, this meeting was called to give the members of these three groups an-
other opportunity to discuss the consultants report. Mr. Love then requested the Planning
Director to review the report.
Mrs. Romans gave a rather general summarization of the Downtown Englewood Traffic Study,
Small-Cooley and Associates, September, 1964, which is concerned with three major areas:
first, ingress to and egress from the Core Area; second, traffic circulation within the
Core Area; and third, parking -both off-street and on-street within the Core Area. In
analyzing these three poin ts , the report provides supplemental information on traffic
lights, signing, pavement marking and street lighting.
Discussion of the Study and the recommendations made in the Study followed. Mr. Love
suggested that a copy of the Study be sent to both Mr. Haase and Mr. Merten in order that
they might have an opportunity to review it before the liaison committee representing the
City in the discussions with the State Highway Department meets with them on the next
occasion.
The matter of the contract between the City and the State Highway Department involving the
Bannock-Highway 70 intersection was di scussed. The Mayor stated that he would be in contact
with the liaison committee that had met with the State Highway Department officials previously,
to discuss the advisability of setting up another meeting to discuss projected traffic
plans of the City which involve the State Highway Department.
It was agreed that the City should work closely with the Highway Department and that a
comprehensive traffic plan must be adopted at once. It was also agreed that the immediate
efforts of the group should be directed toward the coming election, should the Supreme Court
rule that the City may, indeed, submit the question of the validity of the Ordinance which
zones the New Englewood area, the proposed vacation of the streets within the park area and
the purchase of the Norgren building for a City Hall, to the people at the General Election '
on November 3, 1964.
The meeting adjourned at 10:15 P. M.
Respectfully submitted,
D. A. Romans
Secretary, Pro Tern
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CITY OF ENGL EWOO D PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSI ON
REGULAR MEETING
OCT OBER 21, 1964
The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission could not convene due to the
lack of a quorum; however, discussion was held.
Members present: Whitcomb, Fullerton and Parkinson
Members absent: Carlson, Touchton and Rice
Also present: Planning Director Romans and Mr. Shelton.
Mr. Shelton was present to support his request for the L ehigh Park Subdivision. There was
no one present in opposition; however, in the absence of a quorum and clearance from the
Title Guarantee Company, no decision could be made. Mrs. Romans stated that Mr. Sampson
of the Wil k erson Corporation and Mansfield Realty had called to say he is in favor of the
subdivision provided there were no plans to cut an alley next to their property. The
Engineering Department reports that no improvements in the easements appear to be violated
by the plat for subdivision. The matter was continued to the next me eting of the Planning
and Zoning Commission on November 4, 19 6 4.
Page 806
The members present then discussed the Parking Monograph. Mr. Whitcomb felt that it would
be helpful to add the number of parking spaces and cost figures to the over-all map.
Mr. Fullerton suggested that perhaps the bibliography should be arranted in sections for
clarity. He also felt the addition of the words "excess" and "deficient" to the last two
items on pages 29 through 34 would be helpful.
Various traffic and parking area problems and possible solutions were discussed.
Mrs. Romans distributed copies of the Commercial Area Planning Study from ICRPC, which had
been loaned for examination. She also stated that staff members of ICRPC would be happy to
attend a meeting of our Planning and Zoning Commission to discuss their studies on Transporta-
tion and Commercial Area Planning.
The meeting disbanded at 9:3 0 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Esther M. Woodhead
Secretary Pro Tern
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I. CALL TO ORDER.
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 4, 1964
The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by
Chairman Carlson at 8:10 P. M.
Members present: Whitcomb; Touchton; Fullerton; Carlson
Romans, Ex-officio
Members absent: Rice; Parkinson
Also present: Planning Assistant Monson
Audience: Messrs. Shelton; Parchen; Watson; Smith; and Robson.
Mr. Carlson welcomed the audience to the meeting.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
Mr. Fullerton moved:
Mr. Touchton seconded: The Minutes of October 7, 1964 and October 13, 1964, be approved
as presented.
The motion carried unanimously.
III. ENGLEWOOD INVESTMENT COMPANY
Ray Shelton
Mr. Fullerton moved:
SUBDIVISION
Lehigh Park
Mr. Touchton seconded: The Public Hearing on Lehigh Park be opened.
The motion carried unanimously.
CASE #12-64D
Mrs. Romans reported that the Public Hearing had been set for October 21, 1964. A quorum of
the Commission was not present on that evening and no action could be taken. She stated she
had checked with the City Attorney on the situation; it was his opinion the adjoining property
owners would not need to be r e notified of the date of the Public Hearing. There were no ob-
jections to the proposed subdivision.
Mr. Parkinson entered and took his place on the Commission.
Mr. Monson reviewed comments from the Utilities Departments and companies; no objections were
noted. The Plat appears in order for referral to the City Council.
Mr. Fullerton moved:
Mr. Whitcomb seconded: The Public Hearing be closed.
The motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Fullerton moved:
Mr. Whitcomb seconded: The Commission recommend the Final Plat of Lehigh Park Subdivision
to the City Council for f~vor~ble consideration.
The motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Shelton stated he had been informed this parcel was a portion of a subdivision prior to
being used as a dump. The streets in this previous subdivision had been vacated, but the
easements had not. He asked what effect this would have on the acceptance by City Council.
I
I
I