The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989-12-21 EC MEMOor/ ;A 0( (I <ff 9--·3fJa.m · _ . • -nir-4'4 &uLul ,,.u, /-// ~ u---V~/cci',. tt/,,.Lce__ Wu ~ 01-K dL ~ bf2 c:c ~cf!_ ~ ¥' ~ ~o '>' _,,+J~ ~~. yq0v ~d c±u-ri ~ tit~ ~/!~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~d~~~ ~cl ~ ~~ , Wu. ~p(_ ~ U-~ct arzd_ ~ Q 7-dt__ / al-3: 0 CJ ULd<U -d ~ ~·d~ "jft~ &Wei c;-ak;d_/d ~ cJ~u..J & Wi&t-~ ~ a_:f- 1;: 00 -r;~ ~ Uf--A d ~L d'_ 'JJl e ~c::t ~ ~ ~~k~ff / ~.~ -ila ~~~ ~t-~d: ~L ~ ~ ~I!. cJ ~,h,;f?Ud ~ 0!J-{~ CUr_f~ ,;,;., ~d ~ ~~~da,;/-~J/J~ ~~, / ~a-Ju~~~~~ hdcl ~ ~fb_1A_ ~ ~~~ ~~ (!_ /J1 ~ ~cfi55 c(~c::/A <7----)::)u_o 7-<Llid I !/u_ if-/. ~. ~ z <-Ae~o ) /Jnah ~ Me-&-n~ ,/ ~ • ~ ~cJ(~~~&-~ ~ ),~;: ar:U-~J du_ ~ ~ Clth&;_~ <A-~· . ~ ~ ~~o · -. ~-~ ~~~~ ~'d ~ t..1.c~-~d. ~~~dz? ~~ //~ ~d_ ~ t:tA/~~, ~ft &u_lec!__ ~ r 11 ·.;,0 ~fl a.rd ~ _cB.·oo ,;H0 0 ~- / j.JU ~~ - x/M_~JL~ ~d autl ~~~cf . da~~ ~Kdu-~d I& . ~ ';t/l~. td-~~~~/j;~ ~A ~ ~ ~ cJL&...,,,,£~ 5.'0o ~d~. <Q-·cfs-'fi?~"'-~,1 ~ .;.,..,__~ ~ ~ ~ J.t-tke ~ -~ ~~-c:2~~~~ --~~~rY-c~ ~c;;(_ U-e___ ~~ ~ -ttt.-e &-r-~ ~ tvz_c{ ' . -ttu_ ~ i -.A_.e... ~ 7;)., 01/6/t ~ (_ ~ #-'7:s G:SA ~ &~~~ ~(d-c. ~ ~ ~~ °3' i;-R..C~- lrk-~ ~J_ ~ t:iuJ-~ ~ ~~ . . , MEMO TO: Patricia Crow, City Clerk FROM: Rick DeWitt, City Attorney DATE: December 20, 1989 RE: EPBA Protest of Ballot Wording My suggestion to you is that the Election Commission set a hearing date on this subject. bb TO: Rick DeWitt, City Attorney FROM: Roger Fraser, City Manager DATE: December 20, 1989 SUBJECT: Special Election I have reviewed the correspondence from Tom Buescher regarding the wording of the ballot involving the impasse with the Englewood Po- lice Benefit Association to the extent that the ballot wording re- flects the active recommendation of the Board of Career Service Commissioners. I believe we should hold firm in our position on that wording. I will be glad to discuss this with you at your convenience. RF/sb MEMORANDUM TO: Patricia Crow, City Clerk FROM: Rick DeWitt, City Attorney DATE: December 21, 1989 RE: EPBA Protest. On previous occasion, I have recommended that the Election Commission hold a hearing on the subject. At the present time parties are negotiating a resolution to this issue. If this matter is resolved to the satisfaction of the EPBA and the City there will obviously be no need for a hearing before the Election Commission. If it is not possible to resolve this matter, there maybe a need to resolution this matter under Section 10, which states: "The Council may adopt by ordinance such rules and regulations in respect to elections including by reference any laws of the the State of Colorado not inconsistent with the provisions of this Charter or the State Constitution, as may be recommended by the Election Commission." Obviously the Election Commission has the authority to recommend rules and regulations as they believ appropriate. nf City of Englewood OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Rick DeWitt , C ity Attorney Charles C . Grimm , Assistant City Attorney Danie l L. Brotzman , Ass istant City Attorney O r."')~ 19C·J L l; IJ --I v December 21, 1989 Thomas Buescher, Esq. 1563 Gaylord Street Denver, Colorado 80206 Regarding: Proposed Resolution Impasse Question. 3400 S. Elati Street Englewood , Colorado 80110 Phone (303) 761-1140 Please find enclosed City of Englewood's proposal regarding your client's objection. I understand that you have discussed this briefly with Roger Fraser. Please call as soon as possible and Fax a response. With respect to the Election Commission, it looks like we may be able to settle this matter without a hearing before the Commission. Lets leave that option open, in the event that an unforseen event occurs. Enclosure cc: Roger Fraser ~ Patricia Crow Englewood City Council Stan Damas, Esq. nf RESOLUTION NO. SERIES OF 1990 A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 137:6, IMPASSE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE, ESTABLISHED BY THE HOME RULE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, RELATING TO THE ENGLEWOOD POLICE BENEFIT ASSOCIATION/FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGE #22 AND SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION N0.72, SERIES OF 1989. HHEREAS, the Englewood Police Benefit Association/Fraternal Order of Police Lodge #22, has notified City Council of its dissatisfaction with the Career Service Board's recommendation concerning the mandatory subjects of collective bargaining; and WHEREAS, Resolution of December 4, 1989, on this subject was protested and after negotiation and in the spirit of harmony, the Englewood Police Benefit Association/Fraternal Order of Police Lodge #22, and the City Alli~inistration have resolved the controversy on the wording of the ballot; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 137:6 of the Home rule Charter, the City Council hereby submits to a vote of the qualified electorate of the City the final offer of the City, the Englewood Police Benefit Association/Fraternal Order of Police Lodge #22, and the Career Service Board as follows: CITY OF ENGLEWOOD FINAL OFFER -The City's final offer rejected the Senior Patrol Officer pay. THE ENGLE~"700D POLICE BENEFIT ASSOCIATION, FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGE #22, FINAL OFFER The Englewood Police Benefit Association, Fraternal Order of Police Lodge #22, final offer requested the establishment of Senior Patrol Officer pay with a salary increase of 2.0 percent over the Class 1 Patrol Officer at the beginning of the sixth year of service. The salary will increase another 2.0 percent at the beginning of the ninth year, twelfth and fifteenth years for a total of an 8.0 percent increase, in addition to normal pay raises, over a period of ten years. CAREER SERVICE BOARD RECOMMENDATION The Career Service Board recommendation rejected the proposal for Senior Patrol Pay. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. There is hereby submitted to the qualified electors of the City of Englewood, Colorado, at a special election to be held January 30, 1990, the question of the amount of pay raise authorized for The Englewood Police Benefit Association, Fraternal Order of Police Lodge #22, contract for -1 - the year 1990 as it pertains the establishment of Senior Patrol Officers pay. Section 2. The voting machines and paper ballots for said election shall carry the following designation which shall be the submission clause, and voters are allowed to select one of the following, the one receiving the highest number of votes will be deemed approved: CITY OF ENGLEWOOD FINAL OFFER -The City's final offer rejected the Senior Patrol Officer pay. THE ENGLEWOOD POLICE BENEFIT ASSOCIATION, FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGE #22, FINAL OFFER The Englewood Police Benefit Association, Fraternal Order of Police Lodge #22, final offer requested the establishment of Senior Patrol Officer pay with a salary increase of 2.0 percent over the Class 1 Patrol Officer at the beginning of the sixth year of service. The salary will increase another 2.0 percent at the beginning of the ninth year, twelfth and fifteenth years for a total of an 8.0 percent increase, in addition to normal pay raises, over a period of ten years. CAREER SERVICE BOARD REC0~~1ENDATION The Career Service Board recommendation rejected the proposal for Senior Patrol Pay. Section 3. superseded. Resolution N0.72, series of 1989 is hereby ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 8th day of January, 1990. Susan Van Dyke, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia H. Crow, City Clerk I, Patricia H. Crow, City Clerk for the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify the foregoing is a true copy of Resolution No. , Series of 1990. Patricia H. Crow -2 -