Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-11-14 TAC MINUTES• • • City of Englewood, Colorado ENGLEWOOD TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE Minutes of November 14, 2002 The regular meeting of the Englewood Transportation Advisory Committee was called to order by Chairperson Anderson at 7:00 p.m. in the City of Englewood Community Room. Members Present: David Anderson Joe Christie Gary Dounay Betty Goosman Barbara Hodge Cinda Losee (Alternate Member) Ken Ross, Director of Public Works, ex officio Members Absent: None A quorum was present. Also Present: Judge Vince Atencio Approval of Minutes Police Lieutenant John Collins Ladd Vostry, Traffic Engineer Wendy Gracy, Traffic Analyst Linda Wilks, Recording Secretary See attached sign-in sheet Chairperson Anderson asked if there were any additions or corrections to the minutes of October 10, 2002. There being none, a motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes as presented. Motion passed. Public Comment Mr. Bicker noted he is accompanying his son to this evening's meeting to gather information for a Boy Scout project. Old Business • Chairperson Anderson introduced Judge Vince Atencio, who is present to address ETAC's speeding and traffic concerns. Judge Atencio thanked Committee Members for inviting him to the meeting, and began his discussion with some general questions and comments: 1. Does anyone think speeding is a problem in Englewood? Mr. Anderson stated that everyone is aware there is a "perceived" problem. Judge Atencio advised he receives numerous communications through different City departments and through City Council packets regarding ETAC's concerns as well as those of citizens and staff members. 2. Is speeding a problem throughout the entire City of Englewood? Committee Members concurred that it is . 3. Why do we have traffic enforcement? Public safety, behavior modification and prevention were suggested . 4. Do ETAC Members agree with citizen perception that Englewood is deficient in enforcement of speeding and traffic issues? Alternate Member Losee opined that individuals who do not become involved in learning the City's policies and practices, do, in fact, hold this perception. 5. Do you have a different perception of how other cities handle speeding and traffic issues? Discussion ensued regarding the perception of stricter enforcement and fines in jurisdictions such as Sheridan and Cherry Hills. Committee Member Dounay opined that it is not uncommon to observe Cherry Hills officers issuing citations on Belleview Ave. Judge Atencio asserted that Englewood often deals with peoples' perceptions regarding these issues. Mr. Anderson emphasized that citizen perception that was revealed in the Transportation Study cannot be denied, and it must be given consideration. Judge Atencio opined that determination has to be made between perception and reality, which makes a huge difference in the way you deal with a problem. 6. When talking about safety, are we trying to avoid acodents? Yes, accidents and fear of accidents. 7. When you provide enforcement, then, are you looking to reduce accidents where they are known to occur? Preventing accidents where they might occur? Judge Atencio stated the areas in Englewood identified with the most accidents are Santa Fe and Dartmouth, Broadway and Belleview, and the Hampden corridor east of Broadway, none of which are residential streets. Mr. Dounay commented that the high rate of accidents at these locations is identified by statistics, however, citizens want to ensure that statistics are not accumulated in residential neighborhoods. Brief discussion ensued regarding the City's limited resources, keeping a focus on maintaining peace and quiet in the neighborhood areas, increased traffic volume, increased speeding, and increased violation of all traffic regulations. 8. Who are the people who are speeding on the arterial roadways? On residential roadways? Members surmised that the majority of drivers on the arterials pass through Englewood from other jurisdictions of the metro area, while the majority of drivers on the residential roadways are most likely neighbors or other Englewood residents. Regarding enforcement of traffic violations, Judge Atencio reported that, while Englewood officers do write some traffic offenses into the Arapahoe County Court, there were 5,000 traffic offenses filed in the Englewood Municipal Court in the year 1997. At the current pace for 2002, 10,500 traffic cases will have been filed by the end of the year. Judge Atencio stated the perception that there is a lack of enforcement in Englewood does not seem to be valid. Judge Atencio briefly discussed his role as an elected judge, stating he cannot make City policy governing such topics as code enforcement issues or posted speed limits. Judge Atencio revealed that the current Traffic Division speed charts for residential streets indicate that 85% of motorists are driving within 5 mph of the speed limit; however, that figure also indicates that 15% • • are driving faster. • There was considerable discussion pertaining to the methodology used to establish the dollar amount for traffic violation fines. Judge Atencio stated that behavior modification can only be accomplished when 2 individuals are brought before him in court through the citation process. The Department of Motor Vehicles • point assessment schedule is used to establish the Bench Traffic Fine Schedule: • • 1 - 4 mph over the speed limit -0 points 5 -9 mph - 1 point 10 -19 mph - 4 points 20 -39 mph 6 points 40 & over -12 points Judge Atencio discussed his perception of fairness regarding Englewood's traffic fine schedule in relation to promoting respect for the law. The punishment must be in proportion to the severity of the offense . In a recent survey of 20 jurisdictions, four point tickets, first offense, 7 cities had fines of $80, 10 cities with lower fines, and 3 cities had fines of $100 (Denver, Westminster, Wheat Ridge). Judge Atencio offered that being subjected to going through the process of enforcement, the experience of being issued a ticket and paying a fine, is, in many cases, enough to change the behavior of drivers. However, others are not affected by the experience, don't modify their behavior, and receive numerous tickets. Tickets in Englewood are divided into two categories , the less serious Traffic Infractions, and Traffic Offenses, which are careless driving, 6 point speeding, eluding offenses. A traffic infraction citation, such as a 4 point speeding ticket, provides the opportunity for a driver with a good driving record (no citations in the past two years) to enter a plea bargain with the City Attorney to reduce the points, and this can be accomplished by telephone, and mailing the reduced points fine to the court. This system is set up for drivers the court ex pects will modify their behavior as a result of this experience . A driver with a bad driving record, or has not paid fines from other jurisdictions, is not given the opportunity to plea bargain. They can either mail in their 4 point fine, or they can go to the court and plead not guilty, set up a court date, return a second time to speak to the City Attorney, who will then make the offer to lower the points on the condition the driver attends a driving school -Level 1, one day Saturday class, $50; Level 2, two evening classes, $90; Level 3 (high number of citations), 12 hour class, $110. These classes are designed to change the behavior of drivers with numerous driving offenses. After comp leting the class, the driver will return to court to appear before the Judge, at which time he will impose the fine. Judge Atencio noted he is a proponent of the driving classes because of their focus on driving habits and attitudes. Referring to Englewood's traffic fine schedule, copies of which were distributed to Members, Judge Atencio reviewed the graduated fine rates for offense points and number of offenses. Judge Atencio emphasized the thought given by the court system in handling Englewood's traffic offenses, involves the graduated fine schedule, as well as behavior modification. Judge Atencio added that he has the authority to suspend any amount of the scheduled fine, which provides him the means to individualize each case that is presented to him. It is his hope that individuals appearing before him will be less likely to be repeat offenders as a result of the court's ruling, whether it be fines, driving class, etc. 3 Judge Atencio read a quote from former governor, Richard Lamb, "There's nothing more important to community than justice. People must feel that they are fairly treated and that when justice is administered, it is even-handed in proportion." Judge Atencio stated he feels he deals with traffic cases according to this quote. He stated that most people who come in contact with a court will most likely be in contact with a municipal court, and probably for a traffic offense. Judge Atencio expressed a strong responsibility for Englewood's court to establish the respect for laws that some folks feel we've lost. Citizens have to have a feeling they are treated fairly within the system, otherwise there is a breakdown in the respect for the law in general. There was brief discussion regarding the effectiveness of the fine schedule, and the possibility of doubling fines. Judge Atencio advised that the presiding judge has the authority to impose any fine he sees necessary, but generally, he will stick to Englewood's fine schedule. With regard to increased or doubled fines for speeding in school zones, Judge Atencio reported that a recent survey indicated that 7 jurisdictions impose increased fines for school zones while 11 do not. He noted that behavior modification in these areas will occur because of posted signage, "Fines Doubled in School Zones", not because of increased or doubled fines they receive in court. Judge Atencio advised that his set policy for speeding in school zones is no suspension of any part of a fine regardless of your driving record. Judge Atencio encouraged everyone interested to come and observe a court session at anytime. He also encourages school groups, Cub Scouts, church groups, etc., to visit the court. He suggested contacting the court ahead of time for a schedule of the types of court cases. In response to Committee Member Dounay's inquiry, Judge Atencio advised that careless driving and running a stop sign or red light are 4 point tickets, while reckless driving is an 8 point ticket. Judge Atencio discussed citations for elderly drivers, stating that he often makes referrals to the AARP driving class for individuals of this age group. He noted that in cases involving senior citizens where he feels they are no longer able to drive, he will contact the Department of Motor Vehicles requesting that the individual be retested. Chairperson Anderson thanked Judge Atencio for his enlightening presentation. • Director Ross reported that the January ETAC meeting will be held at Cherrelyn Elementary School, in response to the direction received from City Council to take the meetings out to the community. An advisement will be placed in the upcoming Englewood Citizen. Additionally, the principal of Cherrelyn has agreed that we can send home a notification brochure with each student to advise parents of the meeting. Mr. Ross suggested that the meetings in schools be scheduled every other month so that advisements can be made in the bi-monthly publication of the Citizen. Committee concurred. • Referring to copies of a map depicting possible locations for the Variable Speed Board Signs, Director Ross discussed staff's approach in selecting Englewood's five primary speed hazard locations on the collector streets. Using the available speed data, staff determined that the Oxford "hill", Logan St. between Princeton and Tufts Aves., Dartmouth Ave. between Lafayette and Vine Sts., Logan St. south of Bates Ave., and Clarkson St. north of Quincy Ave. are the five locations with the highest priority based upon the amount of speeding currently being experienced. These locations were determined as a result of speed studies that 4 • • • were conducted when citizens· expressed their concerns regarding high speeds at these locations over the • last 3-4 years. The City will begin the program by placing two Variable Speed Board Signs, conducting before and after speed studies, and then, at that time, determine the effectiveness of the signs and whether or not the purchase of additional signs is warranted. The cost for the signs is approximately $10,000 for two signs. Placement of the signs is dependent on Xcel Energy's time table for installing the required electrical access. Alternate Member Losee noted that double yellow lines have not yet been placed at the location on Dartmouth Ave. between Lafayette and Vine Sts. and vehicles are, dangerously, passing other vehicles. Alternate Member Losee reported that Sergeant Knoth conducted a speed study on Dartmouth Ave. between Clarkson and Downing Sts., and because of the results of the study, the Police Traffic Unit has placed that stretch of roadway on their priority list for frequent monitoring for traffic violations. Director Ross stated he will get the results of the study from Sergeant Knoth and offer whatever assistance staff can provide to help change the traffic pattern in that area. Ms. Losee noted that police officers have had difficulty with their new traffic counting equipment, having to complete the count manually. Traffic Engineer Vostry noted he will place his equipment for a follow-up count. At Committee Member Christie's inquiry, Mr. Vestry advised that his Traffic Division has six traffic counters that are routinely placed and rotated to various locations at the request of concerned citizens, or through staff's continuous monitoring efforts. The counters are placed at each location for approximately one week, weather permitting, to obtain an accurate average speed count. These traffic counts are used to differentiate between perceived and actual speeding • problems . The statistics indicate that 85% of drivers travel at or below the speed limit, while 15% travel above the speed limit. Discussion ensued regarding the effectiveness of installing 25 mph speed limit signs in residential neighborhoods. New Business There was no new business. Director's Choice • Traffic Engineer Vestry reported that he recently met with a classroom of students from Flood Middle School regarding their concerns pertaining to traffic issues, i.e., operation of traffic signals, pedestrian safety, etc. Additionally, Mr. Vestry discussed with the students the City 's plan to upgrade the signal at Broadway and Kenyon Ave., explaining the process involved and the time table for installation, completion of which is planned for 2004. Mr. Vestry noted that, following the pedestrian accident involving one of their fellow students last fall, this classroom of students organized and visited each classroom in the school to speak about pedestrian safety. Mr. Vestry expressed his appreciation for the interest and concerns expressed by these students. • Director Ross noted his response to a letter from student Courtney Herzog regarding some traffic signage concerns, speed humps and enforcement on Delaware St. Copies of his response were distributed • to ETAC Members during the 6:30 p.m. study session meeting. • With regard to installation of the Broadway and Oxford Ave. traffic signal, Traffic Engineer Vestry reported that construction began in early November. Installation of caissons and signal poles is complete, as 5 well as underground boring and pulling wire. Next week, signal head work will begin, and it is expected that the signal will be fully operational in two to three weeks. • Director Ross stated that the water line installation on Elati St. for the RTD maintenance facility is complete. He expressed his disappointment with regard to the contractor's consideration of the residents affected by the project. • With regard to his response to a request from the Americans with Disabilities Act Access Board for input pertaining to their proposed guidelines, Director Ross advised that 1,700 entities responded to ADA with similar comments. Mr. Ross is in hopes they will give consideration to the concerns expressed. Chairperson Anderson added that there is a web site, access-board.gov, with a page dedicated to the comments received. Mr. Anderson stated the information is very informative, i.e., the ridges now being placed in the handicap ramps are specifically to alert blind cane users of the drop-off. • Director Ross advised that the two current one-year ETAC Members, Mr. Christie and Mr. Dounay, must reapply at this time to indicate their intention that they would like to continue serving on the Committee after their terms expire February 1, 2003. An interview will not be necessary. This Committee was first formed in February, 2002; members were appointed with one and two year staggered terms. • Director Ross advised he will be addressing City Council on Monday night regarding reducing the City's residential speed limit to 25 mph. Brief discussion ensued. Chairperson's Choice • Chairperson Anderson reported that last month he attended the RTD meeting with City Council to hear • Council's presentation regarding the Bates Ave. Light Rail Station. Because of the current economic downfall, RTD has cancelled their plans to construct a light rail station at Bates Ave., which Englewood was counting on to serve as a center for residential and commercial development. To obtain sufficient funds for this and other projects, RTD will have to request a vote of the citizens for approval of a tax increase for the needed "FasTracks" funds. Chairperson Anderson updated Committee Members on the enhancement that has been made to the ETAC web page. He noted that an additional page has been added that lists the names of Committee Members, and asked that anyone with other ideas for enhancing ETAC's web page to bring them up for discussion. Committee Members' Choice Referring to public comments contained in the attachment to Mr. Ross' memorandum regarding residential speed limits, Committee Member Hodge inquired about widening the Dartmouth and Broadway intersection, or at the least, restriping Dartmouth at Broadway, to increase eastbound Dartmouth to northbound Broadway volume. Currently, vehicles are blocked from entering the turn lane by others waiting in the through lane. Director Ross stated that the residents on Dartmouth Ave. have indicated they do not want increased volume on Dartmouth Ave. Traffic Engineer Vostry explained that restriping would interfere with the entrance/exit to the businesses on the southwest corner of the intersection. 6 • ·~ • • • Committee Member Dounay reported that he received a citizen comment that the northeast part of town near Downing St. does not receive ample sanding during snowstorms. Mr. Dounay asked that data be provided for discussion at the December ETAC meeting regarding the circumstances of a fatal pedestrian/truck accident that recently occurred on Broadway in north Englewood. Mr. Dounay discussed his thoughts regarding a strategic plan for ETAC. He presented several points he believes may be relevant in the operatic~ and planning of projects and goals that may be undertaken by this Committee. Mr. Dounay stated he will provide a copy of his summary to Members and staff, and asked that this topic be included on the December agenda for discussion. Committee Member Goosman inquired about hedges reducing visibility at Dartmouth Ave. and Lafayette St. Traffic Engineer Vestry stated he will contact Code Enforcement regarding this hazard. Adjournment There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Linda Wilks, Recording Secretary 7 r.· • • •• ' -~, ~--~kv\ Cit y of Englewood ENGLEWOOD TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE ,. NAME \3t Cll.tl'- VISITOR SIGN-UP SHEET Regula r Meeting 11 /14/2002 ADDRESS ~t:f'{ S'_ Uw1 ~~~~ rS(.n;( ~fk Dt0~ I rM ·· tw~~~ ( ' (J to ftJ 1l.l I ) Page 1 PHONE ~o 1 /-.;; 1. "S I