Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-12-19 CEAC MINUTES• • • 1. CODE ENFORCEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES DECEMBER 19, 2001 Call to Order. The regular meeting of the Englewood Code Enforcement Advisory Committee was called to order at 6:35 p.m. by member Roth in the City Council Conference Room. Roll Call. Present: Ex-Officio: Absent: Excused: Roth, McCahill, Blair, Olsen Lynn, Moore, Yurchick Roberts, DesMarteau, Nabholz Flaherty 2. Approval of Minutes . Member Blair moved and member McCahill seconded that the minutes of the November 21, 2001 Code Enforcement Advisory Committee meeting be approved . Ayes: Nays: The motion carried. 3. Public Open forum. Roth, McCahill, Blair, Olsen None a. Joan Casey, Denver Dumb Friends League. Joan Casey from the Denver Dumb Friends League came to speak on dog licensing on behalf of animal protector, Ruth Steel. She presented information from The Humane Society of the United States favoring differential dog licensing fees for spayed/neutered animals. b. Glen and Cynthia Searfoss, Englewood residents. Glen and Cynthia Searfoss expressed their opposition to loose dogs in city parks, attacking them and their two dogs. They discussed several dog related issues going on in their neighborhood, are concerned about increased dog bites, and not being able to frequent the parks. Lynn went into discussion about the off leash pilot program and how it started. Per Lynn, Code Enforcement has received several phone calls from citizens wanting additional parks to be opened up, and some calls saying five parks is too many. These calls have been forwarded to Dave Lee, Parks Department. PAGE 1 • • • 4. Old business . a. Animal Licensing. Roth reiterated City Council's stand on the dog licensing fee program from the last Study Session, expressing their concern for the cost of it. Yurchick inquired how an annual licensing program would be beneficial. Roth explained the licensing would be a way to track how many animals people have, and it would also track rabies vaccinations. Lynn explained that at the December 3rd Study Session it was opportune timing for Roth to address the cost structure, but the discussion of fees digressed into much larger issues. Council then directed Code Enforcement to address Council in January at another Study Session with issues that were raised. Lynn presented an outline of what he proposed , and welcomed comments / ideas from members to add more topics. Lynn added that the Code Enforcement staff supports licensing by a full/part-time Officer with an annual tag requirement , and a graduated fee structure. Lynn then proceeded to make a scheduled conference call to Mike Bums at PetData in Dallas , Texas to discuss how his pet licensing program works. Questions that were asked of Mike as follows : Is PetData information available to send out to individual cities on an update basis ? Mike replied that it is routinely electronically updated and transferred or a hard copy transfer is made . A fee of $3 .50 per license covers everything with no up-front costs , which includes license tags , notification renewal , license renewals , and monthly reports . McCahill was concerned about supplemental fees that we wouldn 't be aware of. Lynn asked how we would communicate with PetData if we pick up an animal at 2:00 a.m. Mike replied that PetData has a database which runs 24/7. McCahill asked if Mike has a volume registration per month that needs to be met , and Mike replied no. Yurchick asked at what point the price starts going down ? Mike replied at 50 ,000 licenses per year. Lynn asked Mike 's input implementing a flat fee versus a graduated fee structure. Mike strongly supported a graduated fee. He added that PetData has a ten day tum around on their pet licensing program . Yurchick inquired of the program mechanics, how do citizens get their licenses ? Mike replied there are several ways : the citizen can come to the shelter (with a reduced cost), coming from the initial database , or they can do it online. PetData takes care of everything: they do the rabies vaccination renewal, the license renewal (2°d delinquent notices also sent out), they send out monthly reports, and mail correspondence targeting specific zip codes. McCahill mentioned the need in making certain that the dog licensing will be enforced . Additional discussion followed on PetData and chipping animals . b. Decriminalization Initiative. This issue is still with the City Attorney. 5. New business. a. City Council Presentation. Lynn stated that he will be giving his City Council Presentation on dog licensing at a Study Session in February . He will revise the outline and bring it to the next meeting . PAGE2 • • • b. November 2001 Code Enforcement Monthly Activity Report. The November 2001 Code Enforcement Monthly Activity Report was discussed. Lynn mentioned the substantial amount of training received by officers during the month, and pointed out that positive public relations contacts remained very high. 6. Topics for January 16, 2002 meeting. a. Animal licensing b. Constantly barking dogs c. December and Annual Reports 7. Adjournment. Member McCahill moved and member Olsen seconded to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously and the meeting adjourned at 8:28 p.m. A y es: Nays: Roth, McCahill, Blair, Olsen None Susan L. Osborne , Recording Secretary PAGE3