HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966-04-06 PZC MINUTESI
I
I
. I. CALL TO ORDER.
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
April 6, 1966
Regular Meeting
Page ·907
The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 8:00
P.M. by Chairman Woods.
Members present: Love, Rice, Touchton, Woods
Romans, Ex-officio
Members absent: Carlson, Parkinson
Also present: Denver Planning Director Braman
Assistant City Attorney Paup
Mr. R. A. Miller
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
Chairman Woods stated Minutes of the meetings of March 23, 1966, and March 30, 1966, were
to be considered for approval.
Love moved:
Touchton seconded: The Minutes of the March 23, 1966, and March 30, 1966, meetings be
approved as written.
The motion carried unanimously.
III. R. A. MILLER
2400 S. Raritan
1963 Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
Trash Transfer Station
CASE #6-66B
March 30, 1966
March 23, 1966
Mr. Paup of the office of City Attorney, presented members copies of an opinion requested by
the Planning Commission on Mr. Miller's proposed trash transfer station. Mr. Paup stated
that he understood the question of the Commission was whether the trash transfer use was
governed by Section 22.4-13b(2) of the 1963 Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, or by Section
22.5-19. Section 22.4-13b(2) reads" The sale at wholesale, the warehousing and/or storage
of any commodity, except live animals, commercial explosives or above-ground bulk storage
of flammable liquids or gases, unless and only to the extent that such storage of liquids
or gases are directly connected to energy or heating devices on the premises or to service
adjacent railroad locomotives."
Section 22.5-19 reads: "Uses not Mentioned. Upon recommendation of the Planning Commission,
a Building Permit may be issued for any lawful use not provided for in this Ordinance, when,
in the opinion of the Commission such use is compatible with and not objectionable to nearby
property by reason of odor, dust, fumes, gas, noise, radiation ; heat , glare or vibration or
is not hazardous to the health and property of the surrounding areas through danger of fire
or explosion."
Mr. Paup reviewed decisions of the Colorado Supreme Court, wherein it is stated ordinances
should be construed"in favor of the right of the property owner."
Mr. Paup discussed the opinion of the Attorney's office. It was his feeling the proposed
trash transfer could better be controlled, and enforcement more effective, were the Com-
mission to grant permission under Section 22.4-13b(2). Discussion followed. Mr. Touchton
commented that "storage of commodities" could lead to a very undesirable situation. Mr. Love
was also concerned about "warehousing" and storage; he pointed out that while Mr. Miller had
stated in his written request there would be no "storage", it is a possibility. He felt this
would, in effect, be allowing a "dump" in an I-1 District. Mr. Rice discussed the screening
requirements of the I-1 District, which states that an I-1 "Building site" abutting a Resi-
dential Zone District shall provide screening. Mr. Paup stated the definition of "building
site" could determine what area would have to be screened.
Love moved:
Rice seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to the Building Department that
permits needed for the proposed trash transfer station be granted
Mr. Miller under Section 22.4-13b(2) of the 1963 Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance.
Discussion followed. It was suggested that emphasis be placed on Section 2214-13j,
Limitations on External Effects of Uses; and Section 22.4-13k, Screening; in the granting
of the permits and the subsequent operation of the trash transfer.
Upon the call of the role:
AYES:
NAYS:
Love; Rice; Touchton; Woods
None
The motion carried.
IV. MASTER STREET PLAN CASE #2-65L
Mrs. Romans introduced Mr. James Braman, Denver Planning Director, who was present to
discuss the Denver Transportation Plan.
Page 908
Mr. Braman stated the metropolitan area is cooperating on the Denver Metropolitan Area
Transportation S t udy; Denver has devised a "traffic corridor" system, and has recommended
it be studied further. Some of the proposed traffic corridors will have an affect on the
street pattern of Englewood. The Denver Planning Board has adopted a network system of arterial
routes, such as Colorado Boulevard and Santa Fe Drive; approval has been given the specific
streets in this system. Mr. Braman stated it was unlikely the Planning Board would give
final approval to a major freeway designation at this time. It was determined, after con-
siderable study, that the Denver Metro Area would be a low density community for some time,
thus placing heavy reliance on the automobile for transportation. This has necessitated the
consideration of "freeways", which, it is felt, will benefit the area.
Mr. Braman stated that Highway 70 is projected as a "limited access freeway" within the next
few years by DMATS and the Denver Planning Board. The importance of proper development of
Highway 70 to Englewood was discussed. Mr. Braman stated that right-of-way for a freeway is
250 ft. to 300 ft.; much of this could be obtained on Highway 70 at the present time, however,
the State Highway Department does not seem interested. Mr. Braman stated that in his opinion,
the "ideal" freeway is "depressed"; it was mentioned that the Commission had discussed the
depression of Highway 70 with Highway Department representatives, and the plan did not meet
with approval. It was suggested by Mr. Braman that any recommendations on the Highway be
submitted to DMATS before June, 1966, and that a priority or staging of development be set
forth.
Mr. Braman briefly discussed the proposed Columbine Freeway; it is proposed to extend along
South Zuni Street, angling to the general area of Platte Canyon Road.
Mr. Braman stated that Denver has for some time designated Yale Avenue as a major arterial,
and it will continue to be so designated. He suggested the possible designation of Quincy
Avenue as a major traffic corridor also.
Commission members expressed their appreciation for Mr. Braman's presentation.
V. FUTURE MEETINGS.
The next regular meeting of the Plannirg Commission is April 20. The Chairman and Director
will be attending the ASPO Convention. It was determined that the next meeting would be
held on April 27, 1966, unless a matter of immediate concern would arise in which event, a
meeting could be called for April 13, 1966.
Touchton moved:
Rice seconded: The meeting be adjourned.
The motion carried, and the meeting was declared adjourned at 9:30 P.M.
Gertrude G. Welty
Recording Secretary
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD BUILDING DEPARTMENT REGARDING ACTION OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE
CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
DATE: April 6, 1966.
SUBJECT: Trash Transfer Station
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommend to the Building Department that permits
needed for the proposed trash transfer station be granted Mr. Miller under
Section 22.4-13b(2) of the 1963 Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.
Respectfully submitted,
By Order of the City Planning
and Zoning Commission.
Gertrude G. Welty
Recording Secretary
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
April 26, 1966
In lieu of the rescheduled regular meeting of April 27, 1966, members of the Commission and
staff attended a special discussion held at the County Welfare Auditorium by the Arapahoe
County Planning Office and County Commissioners.
The discussion, with Mr. Beier and l\'1r. Linvahl of the State Highway Department, and Mr. Brandt
of Inter-County Regional Planning Commission, was on the System 4B of DMATS.
Even though a plan for System 4B was presented, there were no volume figures available for
this phase of the study. It was thought they would possibly be available for consideration
sometime next week.
I
I
I