Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1968-03-20 PZC MINUTESPage 1036 IX. FIRST NATIONAL BANK 3400 S. Cherokee and S. Cherokee Circle REZONING CASE #7-68 R-1-C to B-1 Mrs. Romans stated the Planning Department has received a rezoning application filed by property owners in the 3400-block of South Cherokee Street and South Cherokee Circle, represented by Mr. Wm. K. Malone. They are requesting rezoning from R-1-C (Single-family Residential) to B-1 (Business). Lone moved: Parkinson seconded: The Public Hearing on the request ofproperty owners in the 3400 block South Cherokee and South Cherokee Circle for change of zoning from R-1-C (Single-family Residential) to B-1 (Business), be set for March 20, 1968. The property is to be posted, and public notice is to be given in the official City Newspaper. The motion carried unanimously. X. MR. KINGSLEY 1900 W. Harvard SUBDIVISION CASE #8-68 Mrs. Romans stated that Mr. Oliver Kingsley owns property at the northeast corner of West Harvard Avenue and South Tejon Street. Mr. Kingsley has sold off a portion of his property, which is not a part of an approved subdivision, and is, therefore, in conflict with the pro- visions of the Subdivision Regulations. The Director reported that Mr. Kingsley had approached the Engineering Office and requested a tax split on these two properties, and that the Engineering Office had brought it to the attention of the Planning Department. The Engineering Department has refused to give Mr. Kingsley a tax split until the property has been subdivi.ded, or until a waiver has been given to Mr. Kingsley by the Planning Commission. Mrs. Romans pointed out that additional right-of-way is needed for West Baker Avenue, which borders this land on the north, and suggested that if, indeed, a waiver is granted, that it be subject ta dedication of this additional 30 ft. of right-of-way. Discussion followed. Mr. Criswell suggested that a copy of the letter Mrs. Romans sent to Mr. Kingsley be sent to the County Clerk and Recorder with the request that. it be recorded. Inasmuch as Mr. Kingsley was not present, no action was taken. XI. COMMISSION CHOICE. Mr. Touchton asked if the Commission should write a letter of appreciation to Mr. Sam Love for his service on the Commission. It was agreed that this would be done. Mr. Parkinson discussed the Commission recommendation of February 7, 1968, that an Urban Renewal Authority be formed in the City of Englewood. The City Council has referred the matter back to the Planning Commission. He stated he knew the Urban Renewal Authority Director in Littleton, and felt this gentleman would be happy to discuss the matter with the Commission. Mrs. Romans suggested that perhaps Mr. Miles, the State Planning Director, would also be well qualified to discuss the matter. She also felt that personnel with the HUD office in Fort Worth, Texas, should be invited to discuss the matter with the City officials. Further discussion followed. Carlson moved: The meeting be adjourned. The motion was seconded, carried, and the meeting was declared adjourned at 10:15 P.M. Gertrude G. Welty Recording Secretary * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I. CALL TO ORDER. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MARCH 20, 1968 The Regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairman Woods at 8:05 P.M. Members present: Touchton; Lone; Lentsch; Carlson; Woods Romans, Ex-officio Criswell, City Attorney Members absent: Parkinson II. ·APPROVAL OF MINUTES. Chairman Woods stated the Minutes of February 21, 1968, were to be considered ~or approval. Touchton moved: Carlson seconded: The Minutes of February 21, 1968 be approved as written. The motion carried unanimously. I I I I I I Page 1037 III. FIRST NATIONAL BANK 3400 S. Cherokee St. 3400 S. Cherokee Circle REZONING CASE #7-68A R-1-C to B-1 Chairman Woods stated the area is presently zoned R-1-C (Single-family Residential); the rezoning request is for B-1 (Business). The fee of $50.00 has been paid; the area has been posted and publication was given in the official City newspaper. Lone moved : Carlson seconded: The Public Hearing be opened. The motion carried unanimously. Mr . W. K. Malone, counsel for applicants, stated he wished to point out a correction that should be made on the application. W. D. Brewer , Jr., should be changed to W. D. Brewer, Sr. At the time the application was filed, two lots owned by individuals were under contract for sale to Firbanc and Company. Since that time, the sale has been completed, and Firbanc now owns Lot 5, Block 1, McKinley, and Lot 6, Block 1 , McKinley, which lots were formerly owned by Mrs. Peterson and Mr. Mallory, respectively. Mr. Parkinson entered and took his place with the Commission . Mr. Malone submitted a map of the area , and noted that ownerships as noted on this map were no longer accurate. He pointed out that the a r ea is surrounded by Industrial zoning to the west, B-1 zoning to the north and east, and B-2 zoning to the southwest. Mr. Malone then presented a petition signed by property owners asking the Commission to favorably consider the rezoning. Mr. Malone pointed out that three property owners who did not join in the application have signed the petition asking for B-1 zoning. Mr. Malone stated that there has been no contact with Longmont Company, owner of part of Lot 9, Block 2, McKinley Subdivision 2nd Filing, inasmuch as he had been informed that this property is under lease by the City Hall with the option of purchase. Mr. Criswell stated that this particular parcel o f land had been added to the present lease in exchange for another piece of land to the west and south of the Cherokee Circle extension. Mr. Malone then presented a document signed by all property owners with the exception of Longmont Company, which document is titled "REVOCATION AND RESCISSION OF RESTRICTIVE COV- ENANTS." He also presented two copies of an artists concept of the proposed use of the Bank property along Hampden Avenue between South Cherokee Street and South Elati Street. Mr. Malone also presented two folders of photographs taken March 20, 1968 of the subject and surrounding area. Mr. Malone then pointed out the change in condition that has taken place in the subject area and the adjacent areas, and stated that in his opinion, more de- velopment will come about. Mr. Malone reviewed that the former park and golf course is now devoted to the Englewood Cinderella City Shopping complex, the site of the former City Hall on South Bannock is now the location of the ten-story Continental National Bank. In addition, South Elati Street has been opened, West Girard Avenue has been opened from South Elati Street east to Sou t h Bannock Street, and Cherokee Circle has been extended westward to South Elati Street adjacent to the south side of the City Hall. Mr. Robert Clark, Senior Vice-President, Trust Office of First National Bank, spoke in favor of the rezoning. He stated he was familiar with the property and the proposed development by the Bank, and was hopeful that actual construction could begin within the very near · future. He stated that the First National Bank, and Firbanc Company has acquired property in McKinley's Subdivision. They feel there is a great potential for development of this property at some time in the future, although there are no immediate plans to develop the property owned by Firbanc and Company. He stated that there have been discussions on the development of the property, but there are not yet any firm commitments for development. Mr . Clark discussed the commercial development which has taken place , and the resulting changes in the character of the subject area. He also discussed the traffic patterns, and the streets which have been opened , thus increasing the traffic in and around the area. Mr. Parkinson asked if the only area for which there was a particular plan of development was the area on the immediate south of the Cherokee Circle extension? Mr. Malone replied that this was so; this property will be part of the First National Bank complex. Mr. Ray Ludwig, 2888 South Ogden, spoke in favor o 'f the rezoning. He stated he was a real estate broker, and has handled sales in the subject area. He stated that Ludwig Florists owns Lot 1 , Block 1, McKinley's Subdivision 2nd Filing, and are interested in obtaining B-1 zoning to enable them to construct a floral shop at that location. They presently have their business located at 2739 South Broadway. He stated he is also a stockholder in Ludwig and Jorgensen Investments, Inc., which owns Lot 1, Block 1, McKinley Subdivision. There are no immediate plans for the immediate development of this property , and Mr. Ludwig stated he thought it would possibly be a joint venture with other owners of property in the area. Mr. Ludwig stated that in his opinion the character of the area has changed, and the desirability of the area as a residential area has been completely destroyed. He stated it was his opinion that this property could not be further developed as res idential, nor could the property presently developed be successfully used as residential. He further stated that he felt the area was in a state of decay because of the changing conditions and changing uses. Mr. Ludwig stated that since the on-street parking has bee n re s trict ed , people who do not have garages or driveways do not have parking space for t he i r ow n a ut omobiles. Mr. Parkinson asked if there had been any indication that a portion of this area would be devoted to a parking area? Mr. Ludwig stated he was sure that a portion o f it would have to be used for parking, and cited several uses in the area tha t we r e in need of additional parking. Mr. Malone stated there was an agreement on the pa rt of t he Bank and the developer of the shopping complex xhat adequate parking would be provided on the Bank's property. Mr. Malone summarized their presentation; he felt the need for a cha ng e has been demonstraied and that they have met the requirements of the Zoning Ordi n ance, inasmuch as the requested zoning will eliminate a "spot" zone, will complete more than one block of compatible zoning, and will help tie the business area on Broadway closer to the shopping complex to the west. Page 1038 Mr. Woods asked if anyone else present would wish to speak in favor of the rezoning? No one indicated a desire to speak. A show of hands indicated six persons were present in favor cf the rezoning request. Mr. Woods then asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak in opposition to the rezoning request? There was no one present to speak in opposition. Parkinson moved: Touchton seconded: The Public Hearing be closed. The motion carried unanimously. Discussion of the case ensued. Parkinson moved: Touchton seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council that the rezoning re-. quest filed by the First National Bank of Englewood requesting a change of zone from R-1-C (Single-family Residential) to B-1 (Business) for the 3400 block of South Cherokee Street and 3400 South Cherokee Circle be ap- proved for the following reasons: 1) This action will complete more than one block of compatible zone classification as required by the Rules and Procedure of the Planning Commission; 2) There has been demonstrated a demand and need for the uses permitted in the B-1 District; 3) The property cannot be reasonably developed nor continue to be used for the uses permitted under the R-1-C classification; 4) The character of the area has changed and now warrants rezoning; 5) The proposed rezoning will permit development compatible with the business uses which are presently surrounding this subject site. The motion carried unanimously. IV. OLIVER KINGSLEY SUBDIVISION CASE #8-68A Waiver of Regulations 2 /21 /68 Mrs. Romans stated that a request had been made to the City Engineer's office in the fall of 1967 for a tax split on property that had been owned by Mr. Oliver .Kingsley in northwest Englewood. It was reported to the Planning Director by the Office Engineer that Mr. Kingsley had sold a piece of property and was requesting the split. After this matter was brought to the attention of the Planning Department, a letter was sent to Mr, Kingsley advising him tm t the Subdivision Regulations require that a plat be filed prior to the division of unplatted land in the City of Englewood; but that the Subdivision Regulations provide that in some in- stances, waivers may be granted to these provisions upon application to the Planning Com mission. The lett~r was dated October 25, 1967; a copy of this letter was sent to Mr. Joy Potts, the alleged purchaser. Mr. Kingsley did come into the Planning Office to discuss the matter, and a subdivision application and a copy of the Subdivision Regulations was given to Mr. Kingsley at that time. In a subsequent telephone conversation with Mrs. Romans, Mr. Kingsley arranged to attend the February 21, 1968 meeting of the Planning. Commission to discuss the matter, but he did not attend that meeting, nor did he contact the Planning Department. On March 4, 1968, Mrs. Romans again wrote to Mr. Kingsley advising him that the sale was not in conformance with the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations, and sug~ gewted again that he should meet with the Planning Commission to discuss the filing of a plat, or to request a waiver of the Regulations. Mr. Kingsley had spoken to Mrs. Romans by telephone and indicated he would be in attendance at this March 20, 1968 meeting, but was not present. Copies of both letters to Mr. Kingsley have been filed with the County Clerk and Recorder. The Director asked what the desire of the Commission was in the course of action to be pursued? Discussion followed .. Mr. Criswell commented that a suit is being filed very shortly against Mr. Kingsley on several other Ordinance violations, and that this matter could possibly be added to that suit. He stated it might be advisable to get a clarification on the enforceability of the Subdivision Regulations. from the Courts, and that a suit filed in this case asking ror a declaratory judgement voiding the sale of land based on the failure to comply with the Sub- division Regulations could be included with the other matters to be taken to Court against Mr. Kingsley. Touchton moved: Parkinson seconded: Discussion ensued. In view of Mr. Kingsley's failure to comply with the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Englewood, the Planning Commission recommend to City Council that the City Attorney be authorized to file suit against Mr. Kingsley asking that the sale of a portion of his land at 1900 West Harvard Avenue to Mr. Potts be declared null and void. The vote was called, and the motion carried unanimously. Mrs. Romans pointed out that some citizens of Northwest Englewood are attempting to obtain street dedications, and stated that considerable land will · be needed from Mr. Kingsley if these streets are to be opened. He has indicated a willingness to dedicate the land if. the City will agree not to assess him for the pav.ing. Discussion followed. I I I I I I V. STREET DEDICATION South of Union, east of South Decatur Street. Page 1039 CASE #9-68 Mrs. Romans stated that City Manager Dial had been contacted by Mr. Fiesner on the maintenance of a lane that extends south of West Union Avenue, and east of South Decatur Street. Upon investigation, it is found that there is a 16' x 500' dedication, and that the "lane" which extends further south providing access to certain properties is not public right-of-way. Mr. Dial has asked for a determination from the Commission as to whether or not a 16' dedicaticn for the remainder of the distance of the "lane" would be acceptable? The Director stated that she personally was of the opinion that nothing less than a 60' right-of-way should be accepted. She pointed out that the land to the east of the 16' dedication is zoned for in- dustrial uses, and that most of the property to the west, though zoned residential, is used for agricultural uses. The entire street system in this area was discussed. Mrs. Romans pointed out that between Federal Boulevard and South Santa Fe Drive there are no through east /west streets between Union Avenue and Belleview Avenue. She suggested that possibly the residents of the area could be invited to discuss the possible opening of additional streets. Further discussion followed. Parkinson moved: Lone seconded: The Planning Commission recommend that no street dedication less than 60 ft. right-of-way be accepted in the area South of West Union and east of South Decatur Street; further, that the residents of the area be invited to discuss the matter of access with the Planning Commission. The motion carried unanimously. The Director was asked to advise the City Manager of this consideration. VI. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS REFERRAL Chang& of Zone from R-1-C to R-3. CASE #10-68 Mrs. Romans stated that a recommendation had been received from the Board of Adjustment and Appeals recommending that the zoning of the 3300 block of South Logan and South Pennsylvania be ·changed from an R-1-C (Single family) classification to an R-3 (Multi-family) class,ification. The area is bounded by multi-family zoning on three sides. Mr. Lone asked what progress has been made i~ the revision of the Zoning Ordinance and an over- all look at the zoning designations of the City? Mrs. Romans stated that this area had been considered by the staff for R-3 zoning when the 1963 ·Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance was adopted. However, there were some people in the area who expressed concern, and the Commission decided that the application of R-3 in that area might be premature. There are some basement apart-. ments, which have not been properly registered as non-conforming uses, and two music studios, etc. in this area. This area is one of the older sections of town and does need redevelop- ment; however, the Director stated that in her opinion, zoning the · area R-3 simply to make these non-conforming and illegal uses legal, does not seem the proper way to plan for the redevelopment of the area. Mrs. Romans passed copies of the Montage, a study based on the 1960 Census, to Commission members, and directed their attention to the section devoted to dilapidated and deteriorating housing. Discussion followed. -Mrs. Romans stated that it was the opinion of the staff that the R-2 ~nd R-3 zones will have to be revised someway in the revision of the Ordinance. Copies of the 1964 Land Use Study were given Commission members. She pointed out that of the total area zoned for R-3 use, only 10.9% is d~veloped as multi- family. Mr. Touchton asked what progress was being made on the enforcement of the Housing Code? Mrs. Romans stated she did not think that there was any one person working specifically on the enforcement of the Housing Code as yet. Further discussion followed. Lone moved: Parkinson seconded: The Planning Commission receive the recommendation of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, and table the matter for further study and consideration. The motion carried unanimously. - ---- --- ---- - --- -~ --- VII. SAFEWAY STORES SIGN CASE #11-68 Sherman & Highway 70 Mrs. Romans stated that the matter of permitting a sign on City property at Highway 70 at South Sherman has been referred to the Planning Commission by the City Council. Mrs. Romans read the foll~wing l _etter: "March 8, 1968 Mr. St.anley Dial City Manager City of Englewood P. O. Box 178 Englewood, Colorado 80110 New Safeway Store No. 004 125 East Hampden Avenue Englewood, Colorado As you know, we have opened our new store and are in the process of tearing down the old building. We have every expectation of this being a real good investment for our Company. Will you please inform everyone concerned that we greatly appreciate the cooperat~on of the City of Englewood in the installation of the bridge on South Sherman Stree~ en~bling ou~ customers to arrive at our store from the Jefferson By-Pass. I am sure this will help im- measurably in the business we do at our store, as well as help to funnel potential customers to the South Broadway business district. Page 1040 we would further appreciate it if we could be allowed to install a sign directing people to our store at the northwest corner of the Jefferson By-Pass and South Sherman . Street. A sign just large enough to be visible to motorists coming from both the east . and west would suffice and we have asked Mr. Herb Thornborough of Gordon Neon Company to design a suitable sign ard support for our consideratiop. Would you please discuss this with your people and advise me whether or not we might be per- mitted to install this sign on the City property. /s / A. E. Olson A. E. Olson Division Property Manager AEO:ghs" Discussion followed in which members of the Commission expressed concern at the precedent which could be set by this action. Parkinson moved: Lentsch seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council that advertising signs of individual private businesses should not be allowed on City-owned property. The motion carried unanimously. - --- --- - --- --- --- - -- VIII. INCA-JASON ALLEY VACATION 3500 Block South CASE #29-67E Mr. Jerry Daniels of Banta, Shivers Law Firm, was present to inform the Commission on progress made in this case. Mr. Daniels stated that their client, Mr. Goorman, now owns the entire block, and is requesting vacation of the entire alley. Mr. Daniels stated that he will be meeting with Mr. Kettleson of Mountain States Telephone on March 22 to discuss cost of re- location of the telephone lines. He stated that he will also be in contact with Mr. Parker of the Public Service Company on the relocation and costs of relocation of the electric lines. Mr. Daniels stated that an agreement is being written with Mr. Waggoner, Public Works Director, in regard to any paving that would be needed, and that agreements have been worked out with Mr. Dobratz in regard the sewer man-hole that was installed recently in the alley. Mr. Daniels pointed out that this man-hole was installed at Mr. Goorman's expense. Mr. Daniels stated he felt he could have all agreements signed and everything in order for the Commission to take action at the next meeting. IX. NORTHWEST ENGLEWOOD ZONING I-1 to R-1-C CASE #30-67D Mr. Woods asked if the members wished to discuss this matter? Mrs. Romans stated that she has discussed the matter with real estate agents, lending agents and developers, and that they all are of the opinion that the zoning as it presently exi~ts (I~l) is proper for the development of the subject' area. She stated that she feels the area that is presently zoned R-1-C will remain residential, though it may possiqly dev.elop to a higher density by virtue of the division of lots and an eventual change of zoning. She stated that at this point, her recommendation would have to be that zoning the subject area from I-1 to residential would not be good planning. She pointed out that the petition submitted by the residents was for the area from Tejon to Pecos, Warren to Iliff. She also pointed out that when the Housing Code is enforced, some of these homes in her opinion will not meet the minimum standards, and will require extensive remodeling in order to comply with the Code. She further stated that she is working with other officials on the Denver Model Cities Program with the area known as College View, which adjoins the northwest section of Englewood to the north and west. This Committee feels the area from the Platte River to Federal, from Highway 70 to Jewell Avenue should be considered as one parcel in order to develop a workable plan for the area. She stated they are discussing many ideas; one is the possibility of having one "neighborhood" school for the entire area. She emphasized that this might not be possible after discussions with the school districts, etc., but the Comm~ttee feels the idea is worth investigating. Under preliminary plans, there would be commercial zoning in the vicinity of Federal Boulevard and West Evans Avenue, and residential zoning east to South Tejon Street. A green area is proposed to the south along the draw that borders the southern end of the residential area now, and along the Platte River. The area between Tejon and the east City limits would be developed as an industrial park and the industrial development to the east of our City boundary in Denver would remain. Mrs. Romans discussed the street dedications in the Northwest Englewood area. She stated that there are citizens in the area working to obtain signatures for dedications. She asked if the Commission and residents felt that the 60 ft. dedication was necessary, or, if on some of the local streets, they felt a 50 ft. dedication would be sufficient? Discussion followed. Mr. Wilken, a resident of Northwest Englewood, pointed out that there are one or two streets with 60 ft. dedication that are curbed and guttered; he felt that the 60 ft. dedication could be obtained, and that they should work toward that end. Mrs. Perry, a resident of Northwest Englewood, who lives on Harvard Avenue, stated she would be willing to dedicate additional land to have a 60 ft. right-of-way on Harvard Avenue. She also thought they should work toward the 60 ft. dedication. Mr. Woods asked if consideration could be given to the rezoning of the area? Lone moved: Touchton seconded: The matter of the rezoning be raised from the table. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Lone asked if he was correft in assuming that the School Board has reached a decision on the school? Mrs. Romans stated that the Board members have said they will not consider moving the school for at least two years. I I I I I I Page 1041 Mr. Lone stated that in his opinion there is presently a clearly defined boundary between the residential and industrial districts along South Tejon Street. He stated it was a fact that the school is in the industrial area, but this will not change if the area is rezoned for residential use, because the existing industrial uses can continue in the area in- definitely, and the school children will still have to contend with the industrial traffic. He stated that in his opinion, the Commission would not be doing the correct thing to rezone the area to residential and that he feels that it is only a matter of time until the entire area east of Tejon is developed industrially. He stated he was speaking in opposition to the rezoning. Mr. Lentsch asked if the residents who owned their homes were in favor of the rezoning? Mrs. Romans stated that the residents were in favor; the owners of the industrial land, the larger percentage of the area, were in opposition to the rezoning. She reviewed the minutes of the Hearing, and those that spoke in favor of the rezoning were: Mr. Harrison, counsel for the proponents, Messrs. Garcia, Williams, Gance, Garcia, Holifield and Fox. Also speaking in favor were Mrs. Stanley and Mrs. Perry. Speaking in opposition to the rezoning were: Messrs. Gorham, VanderHorst, Mayer, Kerr, Kloppenberg, Barton, Schrepfer, Bratrsovsky, and Mrs. Horlbeck. Mr. Parkinson stated he was inclined to sympathize with the citizens whose homes were in the area, but that he did not necessarily feel that the industrial uses which are presently existing were incompatible with the residential uses. Mr. Lentsch stated he felt the residents of the area should be considered; if the area showed signs of a definite industrial development in five to fifteen years, the area could then be rezoned to Industrial. Mrs. Romans pointed out that this area was closely con- sidered with the 1963 Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance was adopted, and it was the feeling of the Commission and the City Council that the Industrial zoning was proper. Discussion followed. Parkinson moved: Lentsch seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council that the rezoning of the area in Northwest Englewood (Blocks 77, 78, 79, and the south 1 /2 of Block 92, Sheridan Heights, and Blocks 6 and 7, Alta Vista) from I-1 (Light Industr i al) to R-1-C (Single-family Residential) be approved. Mr. Touchton stated he did not feel the character of the area has changed since 1968 when the area was designated as industrial, except to the extent that some additional industrial uses have been developed. He stated that in his opinion if the land were to be designated for its highest and best use, the zoning would have to remain industrial. Mr. Lone stated it does appear to be an injustice to the residents who did appear at the Hearing to state that they want residential zoning, but it is also an injustice to the property owners of industrial property if the area is rezoned. He stated he does not feel .that the area can or will develop residentially, and that even if the area were to be zoned for residential use, that the owners of the land would not be able to get financing to either remodel existing houses or to build new ones. He stated that he did believe, however, that they would be able to get financing for an industrial development in this area. He stated he was in opposition to the change of zoning. Mr. Carlson pointed out that the City is not moving these people out of their homes because of the rezoning. He stated that he did not feel that if the zoning remains as it presently is, that it would be working a particular hardship on people, and that the area is developing industrially now, and will continue to do so. Discussion followed. Upon the call of the role: AYES: Lentsch, Parkinson NAYS: Carlson, Lone, Touchton, Woods The motion was defeated. Mrs. Perry asked what would happen to the residents that have their homes west of Tejon Street? Mrs. Romans stated that she has worked for several years with the Planning Com- mission and the Planning Department, and the residential area West of South Tejon Street has never been considered as anything other than residential. X. NEW ENGLEWOOD ALLEY VACATION CASE #5-68B Mrs. Romans stated this matter has been tabled for further information; that information is not available at this time. XI. NEW ENGLEWOOD OFF-STREET PARKING PLAN CASE #12-67 Mrs. Romans reported that these plans were referred to Public Works Director Waggoner for his approval. No reply has been received from Mr. Waggoner. XII, URBAN RENEWAL Mrs. Romans reported that the Planning staff is in the process of preparing information at this time. It was moved and seconded that the meeting be adjourned. The motion carried, and the meeting adjourned at 10:50 P.M. Gertrude G. Welty Recording Secretary Page 1042 MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. DATE: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: March 20, 1968 Rezoning of 3400 Block South Cherokee and South Cherokee Circle The Planning Commission recommend to City Council that the rezoning request filed by the First National Bank of Englewood requesting a change of zone from R-1-C (Single-family Residential) to B-1 (Business) for the 3400 block of South Cherokee Street and 3400 South Cherokee Circle be approved for the following reasons: 1) This action will complete more than one block of compatible zone classification as required by the Rules and Procedure of the Planning Commission; 2) There has been demonstrated a demand and need for the uses permitted in the B-1 District; 3) The property cannot be reasonably developed nor continue to be used for the uses permitted under the R-1-C classification; 4) The character of the area has changed and now warrants rezoning; 5) The proposed rezoning will permit development compatible with the business uses which are presently surrounding this subject site. By Order of the City Planning and Zoning Commission Gertrude G. Welty Recording Secretary MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. DATE: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: March 20, 1968 Suit to be Filed Against Oliver Kingsley In view of Mr. Kingsley's failure to comply with the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Englewood, the Planning Commission recommend to City Council that the City Attorney be authorized to file suit against Mr. Kingsley asking that the sale of a portion of his land at 1900 West Harvard Avenue to Mr. Potts be declared null and void. By Order of the City Planning and Zoning Commission. Gertrude G. Welty Recording Secretary MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. DATE: March 20, 1968 SUBJECT: Street Dedications RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommend that no street dedication less than 60 ft. right-of-way be accepted in the area South of West Union and east of South Decatur Street; further, that the residents of the area be invited to dis- cuss the matter of. access with the Planning Commission. By Order of the City Planning and Zoning Commission. Gertrude G. Welty Recording Secretary I I I I I I Page 1043 MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE: March 20, 1968 SUBJECT: Advertising Signs on City Property. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council that advertising signs of individual private businesses should not be allowed on City- owned property. By Order of the City Planning and Zoning Commission. Gertrude G. Welty Recording Secretary * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I. CALL TO ORDER. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 3, 1968 The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 8:15 P.M. by Chairman Woods. Members present: Lone; Parkinson; Touchton; Woods Romans, Ex-officio City Attorney Criswell Members absent: Carlson; Lentsch II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. Mr. Woods stated that the Minutes of March 20, 1968 , were to be considered for approval. Parkinson moved ! Lone seconded: The Minutes of March 20, 1968, be approved as written. The motion carried unanimously. I I I. R. G. CUMMINGS Lots 5, 6, 7 & 8, Block 1, Bell Isle Gardens, 2nd Filing REZONING R-4 to I-1 CASE #12-68 Mr. Woods stated that an application had been filed by Mr. R. G. Cummings to rezone Lots 5 , 6, 7 , and 8, Block 1, Bell Isle Gardens, 2nd Filing, from R-4 (Residential-Professional) to I-1 (Light Industrial). The required fee has been paid. Mr. Woods pointed out that the next regular quarterly hearings would be scheduled for June 19th. Mrs. Romans stated that Mr. Cummings' property abuts a Heavy Industrial Zone District in Arapahoe County to the west, and a residential zone district in Arapahoe County on the north. The property to the south is in the City limits, and is zoned for light industry. The R-4 classification was given this property in the Ordinance and Map revision of 1963. The area has not developed as R-4 and the area to the south, which is industrial, is developing. It was pointed out that there are screening provisions written into the Compre- hensive Zoning Ordinance which would protect residential properties abutting any industrial . zoned land. Mrs. Romans commented that there have been numerous inqueries to the Planning Office con- cerning possible rezonings such as this in the past few weeks, and asked i f the Commission wanted to hear them on an individual basis, or if they would want to try to combine them into one hearing at the time of the ordinance and map revision as was done in 1963? Mr. Lone asked what time schedule had been set on the ordinance revision? Mr. Criswell stated that he would estimate it would take at least 90 days before anything could be presented f or Commission review; it would be longer be f ore the revised Ordinance could be presented to Council and finalized. Discussion f ollowed. Mr. Lone commented that a number of small problem areas might be solved were the map to be amended. Mr. Woods asked Mr. Cummings if there were a time limit involved in this rezoning? Mr. Cummings replied that there was none. Mr. Touchton asked if the fee would be waived on these "blanket" changes? Mrs. Romans stated that no fee had been charged in 1963, but that an expression from the Commission as to the procedure they would recommend be followed in this revision would be appreciated. It was generally agreed that upon specific application such as Mr. Cummings, that the usual fee would be assessed, and any unused portion of the fee would be refunded to the applicant.