Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-03-15 EDDA MINUTES• • • ENGLEWOOD DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 333 WEST HAMPDEN AVENUE, SUITE 602 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING MARCH 15, 2000 MINUTES MEMBERS PRESENT: Gartner, LaPorta, Oxman, Sanchez, Weinberger, Yurchick MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: GUESTS ANO VISITORS: Curnow, Duemke, Finer, Kaufman Celva Lauri Dannemiller -Community Development The me~ting was called to order at 4:35 pm. I. INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS ANO VISITORS Chairman Sanchez welcomed Lauri Dannemiller to the meeting . II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Chairman Sanchez asked if there were any additions or corrections to the January 12th, 2000, meeting minutes. There being none, it was moved by Clifford Weinberger, seconded by Jerry Gartner and passed unanimously to approve the minutes as presented. III. TREASURER'S REPORT There being no Treasurer's Report for the previous month, Treasurer, Gary Oxman, reviewed for the Board, year end figures for revenues and expendituresfor 1999 and the current budget IV. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT Chairman Sanchez turned the meeting over to Lauri Dannemiller, planning analyst with the Department of Community Devlopement. Ms. Dannemiller distributed to the Board copies of the Draft "Creative Sign Code" Amendment and proceeded to outline both the philosophy behind this proposed change to the sign code and specific provisions contained in the text of the Draft . ... • • • She noted that the primary intent was to provide "bonuses" for unique or creative signage that would not be allowed under the current code, but that would contribute to the eclectic and/or historic nature of the Broadway corridor. When queried as to why this code revision was limited to just Broadway, she e x plained that this revision was an outgro wth of the South Broadway Action Plan and was being implemented as a test district prior to potentially being e x panded city wide. Ms. Oannemiller went on to detail specific elements of the proposed amendment including the review process for individual proposals. She emphasized that the ne w code section will only come into play when requested signage does not conform to the now existing code. In reviewing the "synopsis of changes" contained in the new amendment, Ms. Danemiller was questioned about the provision and definition covering wall murals. The questions were focused on whether a mural was neceEsarily a sign to :be regulated, or an a rt i st i c exp r e s s i on . Th e ~/ a 1 Ma rt " a r t w a 1 1 '·' w a s b r ought up as an example. Discussion continued. Ms Dannemiller concluded this segmnet of her presentation by telling the Board that the amendment had been through public hearings at Planning and Zoning and was scheduled for first reading·before City Council on April third, with a public hearing on May first. For the second part of her presentation Ms. Oanemiller passed out copies of the Executive Summary Making Connections: Inter- Modal Planning for Urban Centers, which had been prepared by Kimerly Horn, Inc .. She explained that the study had been funded by a grant from the Governor's Office of Energy Management and was designed to provide a review of the varied transportation conditions existing in the city and the current use patterns. She noted that while a number of recommendations for future improvements were made in the study, that a local shuttle serving City Center, downtown and the hospital district was suggested as an important early step. She provided detailed information on costs and potential scenarios for the implement- ation of this initial service. In further discussing costs, Ms. Oannemiller explained that a number of resource options would be investigated for funding, but stated that local businesses would most likely be expected to contribute to the program, possibly through a transportation management association. She added that the timing for implementation of a shuttle service could be projected at a year and a half or when major build out of City Center had been completed. After further discussion Chairman Sanchez thanked M. Dannemiller for her presentations. The meeting adjourned at 5:50pm. submitted d Weinberger