HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-02-08 PZC MINUTES., .
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
February 8, 1994
I. CALL TO ORDER.
The regular meeting of the City Planning & Zoning Commission was called to order by Mr.
Roger Shoop at 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers of the Englewood City Hall.
Members present: Dummer, Gerlick, Shoop, Tobin, Clemens, Becker
Merkel, Ex-officio
Members absent: Garrett (with previous notice); Mason, Covens Oate)
Also present: Planning Administrator Harold J. Stitt
Assistant City Attorney Dan Brotzman
Mr. Merkel introduced Mrs. Marjorie Becker to members of the Planning Commission. Mrs.
Becker was recently appointed to fill a vacant term on the Planning Commission. Mrs. Becker
has previously served on the Planning Commission on two occasions.
Mr. Covens entered the meeting and took his seat with members of the Commission.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
January 4, 1994
Mr. Shoop called for consideration of the Minutes of January 4, 1994.
Clemens moved:
Tobin seconded: The Minutes of January 4, 1994 be approved as written.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Clemens, Dummer, Gerlick, Shoop, Tobin, Covens
None
Garrett, Mason
Becker
The motion carried.
Mr. Shoop then turned the meeting over to Mr. Covens.
ID. COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTERS
400-402-404 West Cornell Avenue
Mr. Covens asked that the Commission be brought up-to-date on this case.
1
CASE #4-94
Mr. Stitt reported that he and Assistant City Attorney Brotzman met with the attorney for
Community Learning Centers on Monday, February 7, 1994, at which time Community
Learning Centers withdrew their application for Conditional Use consideration at 400-402-404
West Cornell Avenue. Community Learning Centers has committed to vacate the premises
within 90 days from the February 7th date.
Should Community Learning Centers find another location in Englewood they would like to
use for their program, the staff of Community Learning Centers and of the City of Englewood
will work together to comply with all code and ordinance requirements prior to opening an-
other "group home/foster home/half-way house".
Mr. Stitt reiterated the commitment from Community Learning Centers to vacate the premises
at 400-402-404 West Cornell Avenue within 90 days, and that they have withdrawn their ap-
plication for Conditional Use approval. This negates the Public Hearing which was scheduled
for this evening.
IV. ELECTION OF OFFICERS.
Chairman/Vice-Chairman
Mr. Covens .nominated Mr. Shoop as Chairman. Mr. Shoop declined the nomination.
Mr. Clemens nominated Mr. Covens as Chairman; Ms. Tobin seconded the nomination.
There were no further nominations for Chairman.
Mr. Gerlick nominated Mr. Clemens as Vice-Chairman. Mr. Shoop seconded the nomination.
There were no further nominations for Vice-Chairman.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Dummer, Gerlick, Shoop, Tobin, Clemens, Becker, Covens
None
Garrett, Mason
None
Mr. Covens and Mr. Clemens were elected officers of the Commission for 1994.
v. SINCLAm MARKETING. INC.
SE Corner of South Elati/U.S. 285
Mr. Covens asked for a motion to open the Public Hearing.
Becker moved:
Dummer seconded: The Public Hearing on Case #2-94 be opened.
AYES: Gerlick, Shoop, Tobin, Dummer, Clemens, Becker, Covens
2
CASE #2-94
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
None
Garrett, Mason
None
The motion carried.
Mr. Covens asked for the staff presentation.
Harold J. Stitt was sworn in, and testified that the issue before the Commission is a request for
Conditional Use approval filed by Galloway, Romero & Associates on behalf of Sinclair Mar-
keting, Inc. Sinclair Marketing, Inc. presently has a gasoline service station on the premises
on the southeast corner of South Elati Street and U.S. 285. They are proposing to raze the
existing structure and replace it with a modern service station/convenience store/carwash facil-
ity. There will be four multiple product fuel dispensers under a canopy, and the facility will
operate 24-hours per day.
Mr. Stitt stated that the application has been taken to the Technical Review Committee, at
which meeting issues were raised by the Utilities Department and the Public Works Depart-
ment. The Utilities Department requires that the 5/8 tap be cut off at the main, and that a new
two-inch water meter must be installed prior to opening the new facility. A two-inch tap also
serves the site at this time. A back.flow assembly installation will be required. The Public
Works Department requires pavement of the alley adjacent to the property. The applicant pro-
poses to pave the alley for a length of 100 feet; however, the balance of the alley will probably
be placed in a Paving District in the near future, and it could be economically prudent for the
applicant to pave the entire 148 foot length of alley at this time. In response to an inquiry
from Chairman Covens, Mr. Stitt stated that the Paving District would probably be 1995 at the
earliest; this alley could be a prime candidate for inclusion in such Paving District because of
the proximity to and improvements proposed along U.S. 285.
Mr. John Scales was sworn in. He testified that he is an architect with Galloway, Romero &
Associates , 14202 East Evans Avenue, Aurora. He is representing Sinclair Marketing, owners
of the property. The existing development on the site is outdated, including services that are
offered by Sinclair. The proposal is to construct a totally new service station/convenience
store outlet, four fuel islands under a canopy, and a carwash. Mr. Scales displayed a colored
plan of the site, indicating the landscaping, location of structures, and fuel islands. Mr. Scales
stated that the traffic through the carwash will flow from the alley to Elati Street.
Mrs. Becker questioned the paving in the alley adjacent to the Sinclair property. Mr. Scales
stated that the proposal was initially to pave only to the alley entrance to the property; how-
ever, if it is necessary to pave the entire length of their property they will do so.
Mr. Shoop inquired about the traffic flow along U.S. 285. Mr. Stitt stated that the applicant is
requesting curb cut permits from the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). Mr.
Stitt stated that the proposed changes in configuration from existing configuration were de-
signed to provide better traffic flow and access into the site. Mr. Stitt stated that he does not
3
know whether more clients access the site from U.S. 285 or from South Elati Street. He ac-
knowledged there may be some slowing of traffic along U.S. 285 for those wanting to access
the service station from the highway; however, if they become regular users of the station,
they will figure out the safest route in a short period of time, and suggested that a majority of
customers will prefer to use the entrance from South Elati Street.
Mr. Covens inquired about the time-frame for construction of the new outlet. Mr. Scales
stated that typically, they try for completion within 90 days after obtaining the required per-
mits.
Mr. Clemens noted that the carwash indicates queuing space for five vehicles; is this typical
for carwash facilities. Mr. Scales stated that the carwash queuing is difficult to predict, but
estimated that there will be probably two or three customers queuing for use at any one time.
Mr. Clemens inquired whether customers who may fill their vehicles are given a "money-off"
coupon for a carwash, and if the queuing line is quite long, whether they have the right to re-
turn for that carwash at a later date. Mr. Scales stated that this is a marketing decision, and
has not been made at this time.
Mr. Clemens also noted there are five parking spaces; is this sufficient for this type of use.
Mr. Scales stated that this type of operation generally doesn't generate a lot of traffic over and
above those ·wishing to fill their vehicle; they shop at the convenience store when they go in to
pay their bill.
Mr. Stitt stated the parking requirements for a carwash are three spaces per bay; five queuing
spaces are shown, which is more than sufficient for the one bay. The parking spaces desig-
nated on site are sufficient to serve the convenience store.
The landscaping on the site was discussed. Mr. Scales noted that the trees to be placed on the
site are deciduous trees and the leaf canopy will be above the line of visibility for motorists
exiting onto South Elati Street or the Highway.
Further discussion ensued on the proposal. Mr. Scales stated that the site will be properly
fenced during the period of demolition/construction to prevent children accessing the site.
Mr. Tom Richards was sworn in, and testified that he is an engineer with Sinclair Marketing,
Inc. Mr. Richards testified that it is the intent of Sinclair Marketing to modernize their sta-
tions on a nation-wide basis; this is one of the first undertakings.
Mr. Dummer expressed concern on the location of the northern-most curb cut on South Elati
Street; is this too close to the U.S. 285/South Elati intersection, and will it cause major traffic
congestion. Discussion ensued. Mr. Richards expressed doubt that this would cause a prob-
lem. Mr. Scales pointed out that the proposed curb cut is six feet south of the existing cut.
Mr. Stitt pointed out that the proposed plan has been reviewed by and approved by the City
Traffic Division. In order to get permits for curb cuts from the State, the total plans have to
be reviewed.
4
•
Mrs. Becker asked whether there should be movement restrictions posted at the curb cut --
such as right turn only. Mr. Stitt stated that there is no reason to do so at the present time; if
it is determined that there is congestion caused by left-turning movements, this can certainly be
done.
Mr. Covens inquired about the removal of the existing storage tanks. Mr. Richards discussed
the regulations governing underground storage tanks, and noted that they will be installing
double wall fiber glass tanks that will not be subject to corrosion. All areas under the tanks,
fills, etc. will be "contained".
Ms. Becker asked what assurance the Commission had that what is proposed will actually be
done if approval is given. Mr. Stitt pointed out that the citations from the Utilities Department
will be accomplished before Utilities gives their approval for utilities service. Landscaping
and parking provisions are required as a part of the building permit process, and the Neigh-
borhood Services staff has to sign approval on the permits/plans.
Mr. Covens inquired about the backflow assembly and the two inch meter/line; is it the intent
of the company to comply with these requirements. Mr. Richards stated that Sinclair Market-
ing has no problem with the compliance of those requirements, or that of paving for the entire
length of the site.
Mr. Dummer further discussed traffic on U.S. 285 and the turning movements that may be
expected
Dummer moved:
Tobin seconded: The Public Hearing on Case #2-94 ·be closed.
AYES:
NAYS:
Gerlick, Shoop, Tobin, Dummer, Clemens, Becker, Covens
None
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mason, Garrett
None
The motion carried.
Mr. Covens called for discussion. Mr. Gerlick addressed the concerns on ingress/egress to the
site, noting that most service stations don't generate that much traffic, and he didn't feel it
would be a problem.
Gerlick moved:
Tobin seconded: The Planning Commission approve the Conditional Use requested by
Galloway, Romero & Associates on behalf of Sinclair Marketing, Inc.
for the modernization of their outlet on the southeast corner of the South
Elati Street/U.S. 285 intersection.
5
The issue of paving the alley for the entire length of the property was then addressed. Mr.
Stitt commented that there is no way to predict the cost of paving work done in conjunction
with the reconstruction/modernization of the facility in 1994 versus cost of paving in 1995
should the applicant determine to wait on the south 48 feet of paving.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSENT:
Shoop, Tobin, Becker, Clemens, Dummer, Gerlick, Covens
None
Mason, Garrett
None
The motion carried.
Mr. Stitt stated that the staff does have in hand the Certification of Posting, and the Notice of
Public Hearing was published in the Englewood Herald on January 27, 1994.
VI. NATIIAN ELINOFF/FUNTASTIC NATIIAN'S
3075-3085 South Broadway
Mr. Covens asked for a motion to open the Public Hearing.
Tobin moved :
Shoop seconded: The Public Hearing on Case #3-94 be opened.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Shoop, Tobin, Becker, Clemens, Dummer, Gerlick, Covens
None
Garrett, Mason
None
The motion carried.
Mr. Covens asked for the staff presentation.
CASE #3-94
Mr. Stitt stated that the request is for Conditional Use approval of a Children's Indoor
Amusement Center proposed to be relocated from Cinderella City to 3085 South Broadway.
This is the site of the former Englewood Press business, and is on the northwest corner of the
South Broadway/West Dartmouth intersection. Mr. Stitt stated that the applicant is Mr. Na-
than Elinoff, who has been involved with children's indoor amusement centers since the early
1980's when he opened "Physical Whimsical" at 3315 South Broadway. This business was
displaced by reconstruction in the 3300 block of South Broadway, and was relocated out of
town. Mr. Elinoff took over the operation of "Funtastics" in Cinderella City several years ago ,
and has now determined it is in the best interest of the business to relocate to the South
Broadway site. Mr. Elinoff will be purchasing the site, and some property to the west of the
alley. The existing structure will be modified to accommodate the various children's indoor
rides and activities that comprise Mr. Elinoff s business.
6
•
Mr. Stitt stated that this application was taken to the Technical Review Committee, and several
conditions were proposed, among them being:
1. Access to the parking lot on the south side of the building shall be designated one-way
westbound.
2. The applicant shall dedicate five feet of property along the south side of the property
for the widening of West Dartmouth Avenue.
3. A drainage plan and parking lot layout will be required for the proposed South Acoma
Street parking lot.
4. The proposal represents a change of occupancy/use; therefore, the building will be re-
quired to be brought up to current code requirements as though it were a new building.
Complete plans shall be submitted and permits shall be obtained. The plans shall bear
the seal of a Colorado licensed architect and may be required to bear the seal of a Colo-
rado registered engineer.
5. The change of use will require that the building be fully protected by a fire sprinkler
system.
6. The change of use of the property will require compliance with the requirements of the
Landscape Ordinance.
7. The use must comply with the parking requirements .
Mr. Stitt pointed out that with the proposed new Walgreen's development on the northeast
corner of South Broadway and East Dartmouth Avenue, and the relocation of Nathan's Fun-
tastics, there will be increased traffic at this intersection. The developers for Walgreen 's were
required to provide 10 feet for additional right-of-way, and Mr. Elinoff is being asked to pro-
vide 5 feet for additional right-of-way. This right-of-way will provide turning lanes on both
segments of Dartmouth Avenue at South Broadway. Mr. Stitt pointed out that there is parking
on the south side of the structure at 3085 South Broadway, and the 5 foot dedication for right-
of-way purposes will not infringe on the use of this area for parking purposes. With the
change of use of the structure , conditions may be i mposed on new owners/businessmen, such
as requiring one-way designation of the access to the parking lot from South Broadway. If
there are problems with motorists trying to cross two lanes of traffic to enter, this will be ad-
dressed later. Inasmuch as the building is undergoing a "change of use", it will have to be
brought up to current code, including sprinklering, providing landscaping, and meeting off-
street parking requirements. Mr. Stitt stated that Mr. Elinoff's plans include the purchase of
property west of the alley, which will be improved for parking purposes; there are two struc-
tures on this site at the present time, but they will eventually be razed.
Mr. Stitt discussed the parking requirements for Mr. Elinoff's business based on the plans pre-
sented . Mr. Stitt stated it appears there will be between 30 -40 off-street parking spaces
available in total. Mr. Stitt suggested that Mr. Elinoff might be required to guarantee devel-
opment of sufficient parking within a specific period of time if the total requirement cannot be
met by opening date. Mr. Stitt stated that his calculations (1 space/each three seats; 24 tables
in the snack bar @ 8 to 12 seats per table) indicate a need for 70 to 80 spaces. The proposal
for 85 off-street spaces at completion of development would be sufficient off-street parking;
however, all will not be available on opening day. Mr. Stitt did make note that much of Mr.
7
Elin off's clientele will becoming by van or bus, or carpooling for events such as birthday par-
ties which may affect the required number of spaces. Mr. Stitt stated that he has not discussed
the possibility of "phasing in" of all the required parking with Mr. Elinoff, and that he would
recommend that all parking must be in place not more than six months after opening day of the
business.
Mr. Stitt stated that there is existing landscaping on the Broadway site, which can be credited
toward the total landscaping needed. Mr. Stitt commented that for some business that cannot
meet the minimum landscaping requirements, there is a "cash in lieu" procedure that may be
used as a last resort.
Mr. Stitt recommended approval of the Conditional use application with the conditions as pre-
viously cited.
Mr. Nathan Elinoff was sworn in, and testified that he has been in the children's amusement
center business since 1982. His business helps develop the motor skills for children, allows
children and adults to interact in enjoyable activities, and all rides allow participation by
physically challenged children. Mr. Elinoff testified that the decline of Cinderella City Mall is
impacting his business, and he needs to relocate to attract more customers. Mr. Elinoff stated
that the former Englewood Press structure has 20,000 square feet, and high ceilings, would
require very little interior renovation with the exception of additional bathroom facilities and
removal of a couple interior walls. There is no asbestos in the building, and some carpeting
will be replaced with tile. There will be no "cooking" beyond microwaving small pizzas and
hot-dogs, so no extensive kitchen construction is anticipated. Mr. Elinoff testified that his
business has attracted customers from all across Colorado, and also from southern Wyoming.
The business provides a clean, safe place for youngsters to have fun. Mr. Elinoff discussed
other business ventures he has tried, such as Lollipop Park in Westminster, and a restaurant
operation in Littleton. These business ventures have not proven to be very successful for him,
but Funtastics "still works", and he wants to stay in Englewood. Mr. Elinoff testified that most
of their customers come in "van loads", and did not feel there would be a big traffic impact
caused by the relocation of the business to this site. Mr. Elinoff stated that he would be relo-
cating most of the equipment that is at the present location, with the exception of the "cave".
Mrs. Becker inquired about noise emanating from the business. Mr. Elinoff stated that there
are no outside rides or loudspeakers; carousel music and other noises are contained within the
operation.
Mr. Elinoff stated that the business is pretty "seasonal"; they do the major portion of their
business during the winter months. He estimated they could provide 60 parking spaces even
without demolition of the two houses on Acoma. Mrs. Becker commented that she has a
problem providing part of the required parking in the rear yard of the two houses on South
Acoma Street. Additional discussion ensued on the parking requirements. Mr. Stitt reiterated
that the parking requirements are based on one space per each three seats in the snackbar area.
Mr. Stitt suggested the possibility of reducing the number of tables provided from 24 to 18; he
stated that he has briefly discussed this with Mr. Schwartz, broker for Mr. Elinoff, during the
8
course of the Hearing. If the number of tables were to be reduced to 18, with 10 seats at each
table, there would be 180 seats; at a ratio of 1:3, this would require 60 off-street parking
spaces. Mr. Stitt stated that the lack of striping and delineated "layout" makes it difficult to
determine what is currently on the site. Mr. Stitt stated that staff has asked that a parking
"layout" be provided. If staff can have assurance there are 60 parking spaces existing, and if
the number of tables in the snackbar are reduced to no more than 18, this would be acceptable.
Mr. Covens asked if there is any precedent to abate part of the landscaping requirement for
owners that are required to dedicate additional right-of-way. He noted that the recommenda-
tion is to take five feet from the property to provide additional right-of-way for West Dart-
mouth Avenue, area which could be used to provide the needed landscaping. Mr. Stitt stated
that this could be done only if there no other area in which landscaping could be provided.
Mr. Stitt discussed areas that may be used in calculating the total area required for landscap-
ing, and landscaping which is provided. Mrs. Becker expressed exception with the areas in-
cluded as provided landscaping.
Ms. Tobin stated that her daughters take their children to Funtastic Nathan's, and they were
pleased to learn of the proposed relocation. Their comments were that the Mall location is
unattractive and not well maintained. Mr. Elinoff stated that he hoped the new location will
provide an easily maintained, clean site. Mr. Elinoff discussed the precautions that he and his
staff take tcr assure the safety of children, and stated that it is a matter of pride that they have
never had a child molested, kidnapped, etc. while at their business.
Mr. Shoop asked if the five foot dedication applied to the entire length of the Englewood Press
ownership , or only Broadway to the alley. Mr. Stitt stated that he is under the impression it is
only to the alley, to provide a turning lane for movement from Dartmouth eastbound to
Broadway northbound. Discussion ensued.
Mr. Shoop then inquired what safety precautions Mr. Elinoff will take regarding the amount of
window glass and the children. Mr. Elinoff stated that the children will not have free move-
ment near the glass; the train, carousel, and other rides will be close to the windows.
Ms. Rene Sitler, 3461 South Clay, was sworn in. Ms. Sitler testified that her 17 year old son
works at Funtastics, and is very pleased with his job. She further testified that her children
had gone to Funtastics when they were small; it's a good business, and she urged that the relo-
cation be approved.
Ms. Mary Mock, 3900 South Hazel Court, was sworn in. Ms . Mock stated that her son also
works at Funtastics. Ms. Mock agreed that the Cinderella City Mall is unkempt and unattrac-
tive; the children are in need of a clean, wholesome location, and the relocation will be much
more visible for the business.
Mr. Stuart Schwartz, Moore Realty , 390 Grant Street, was sworn in. Mr. Schwartz stated that
he has discussed with Mr. Elinoff the possible reduction of tables in the snackbar area to 18,
with 10 seats per table. He stated that a parking layout will be developed and presented to
9
staff. There will be 60 off-street parking spaces on-site even with the houses on the Acoma
Street site.
Discussion ensued on the sites to be purchased by Mr. Elinoff. Mr. Schwartz clarified that
Mr. Elin off will be purchasing the Englewood Press property, plus an additional four lots on
South Acoma Street, on which lots two houses are situated. Mr. Schwartz stated that Mr.
Elinoff is seeking financing to acquire these lots, but until the current owner is paid off, Mr.
Elinoff will not be able to remove the houses because they produce income for the current
owner.
Mr. Elinoff addressed the issue of possible "expansion", noting that it would not be cost effec-
tive for him to increase space or number of rides; unless he increased the admission fee, it
would not be additional income for him. He pointed out that there is 3 % admission tax which
is collected and returned to the City of Englewood. Mr. Elinoff stated that the drivers of
buses and vans that bring the children to Funtastics are very careful drivers; he did not feel
there would be problems with drivers trying to make left turns into the curb cut on South
Broadway. Mr. Elinoff also commented that if the walls of the building are one-hour fire
rated, there may not be a need to install a sprinkler system. This has yet to be determined.
Discussion ensued. Mr. Stitt suggested that the conditions to be imposed on approval of the
Conditional· Use be expanded to restrict the number of tables in the snackbar to no more than
18, and that a minimum of 60 off-street parking spaces be required. If there is an increase in
the number of tables/seating area, or a change in the configuration of the interior layout, that
additional parking spaces will be required.
Covens moved:
Clemens seconded: The Public Hearing on Case #3-94 be closed.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Tobin, Becker, Clemens, Dummer, Gerlick, Shoop, Covens
None
Garrett, Mason
None
The motion carried.
Mr. Covens declared a recess of the Commission. The meeting reconvened; all members pre-
sent except for Messrs. Garrett and Mason.
Mr. Covens asked for the staff recommendation.
Mr. Stitt stated that he would suggest modification of the staff recommendation to stipulate a
maximum of 18 tables in the snackbar, and a minimum of 60 off-street parking spaces to be
provided. Landscaping will have to be in compliance with ordinance requirements. If the Fire
Department finds that the building does, indeed, have one-hour rating it may not be necessary
10
to install a sprinkler system. Requirements of the Building Code/Building Division will have
to be met.
Mr. Covens asked for clarification of the formula used to determine the required number of
parking spaces. Mr. Stitt stated that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance requires one off-
street parking space for each three seats in the snackbar area; 18 tables with a maximum of 10
seats per table divided by three is 60 off street parking spaces (18 x 10 = 180 +3 = 60). The
60 parking spaces must be provided on-site.
Traffic patterns were also reviewed. Mr. Stitt stated that if there is a history of accidents at
the Broadway point of ingress, this can be considered for modification at a later date. He
stated that there is no significant history of accidents at this site currently. Mr. Stitt suggested
that the westbound movement seems to make sense; if children are brought in by bus, they
would unload right by the door and not have to cross parking lot traffic to access the building.
This would be especially convenient for those with physical challenges.
The five foot dedication required for additional right-of-way was also considered. Mr. Covens
inquired whether this would be dedicated by Englewood Press, or by Mr. Elinoff. Mr. Stitt
suggested it would be dedicated by Mr. Elinoff inasmuch as he is purchasing the property.
Mr. Covens expressed concern that the City is requiring five feet from the property that could
be used to provide the required landscaping. He inquired about the "payment in lieu" of land-
scaping provision. Mr. Stitt stated that this provision is $1 x 10% of the lot area, and is used
only as a last resort for those property owner/businessmen who cannot comply with the mini-
mum landscaping provisions.
Mr. Merkel discussed the recent approval of the Walgreen Planned Development; the City has
a policy to have "growth" pay for itself, and pointed out that the City will pay for improvement
of the right-of-way even though we do ask that the right-of-way be "dedicated". By providing
additional space to accommodate turning movements, this will be of benefit to the City and the
area businesses.
Mrs. Becker discussed her concerns with the landscaping provisions. She recalled that when
the ordinance was written a number of years ago, the "payment in lieu" of landscaping was de-
signed for those businesses that were "landlocked" --there was no way they could provide
landscaping on their site. Mrs. Becker stated that she does not find that situation to be true
with the Englewood Press/Elinoff site. Mrs. Becker stated that in the remaining 40 feet of
space between the building and the property line, there can surely be some landscaping in-
stalled. Discussion of the parking layout along the south side of the building ensued. Mr.
Stitt stated that Mrs. Becker is correct that the "payment in lieu" of landscaping was designed
to be used as a last resort, and that this alternative is not offered an applicant up-front. This
provision is determined on a case-by-case basis particularly on landscaping versus parking re-
quirements.
Mr. Covens reviewed the conditions cited in the staff report.
11
Covens moved:
Clemens seconded: The Planning Commission approve the Conditional Use of a Children's
Indoor Amusement Center at 3075-3085 South Broadway, with the fol-
lowing conditions:
1. The applicant shall dedicate five feet along the south side of said
property to be used for the widening of West Dartmouth Avenue.
2. Parking required shall be based on a ratio of one parking space
for each three (1:3) seats in the snackbar/party room.
3. The entrance to the parking lot on the south side of the building
from South Broadway shall be designated as one-way westbound
only.
Discussion ensued. Mrs. Becker commented that in her opinion there are questions that should
have been answered, but that she would vote in favor of the motion. She is of the opinion that
Mr. Elinoff has a viable business in the City of Englewood.
Mr. Covens asked if the staff could provide complete plans for the Conditional Use at a later
date. Mr. Stitt stated that the Building Department will require complete plans prior to issu-
ance of a Building Permit. Copies of this submittal will be made available to the Commission.
The vote was called:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Becker, Clemens, Dummer, Gerlick, Shoop, Tobin, Covens
None
Garrett, Mason
None
The motion carried.
[Secretary's note: Public Notice was published in the Englewood Herald on January 27,
1994.]
VII. COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTERS CASE #4-94
Mr. Covens asked if this issue should be postponed indefinitely. Mr. Brotzman clarified for
Mr. Covens that the application has been withdrawn, and the issue is dead. No further action
needs to be taken.
VIII. FINDINGS OF FACT
Adult Business Amendment
12
CASE #5-93
Mr. Covens asked for consideration of the Findings of Fact on the Adult Business amendment
to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.
Shoop moved:
Clemens seconded: The Findings of Fact for Case #5-93 be approved as written.
AYES:
NAYS:
Clemens , Dummer, Gerlick, Shoop, Tobin, Covens
None
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Garrett, Mason
Becker
The motion carried.
IX. PUBLIC FORUM.
Mr. Covens acknowledged the attendance of Councilwoman Rita Hathaway.
X. DIRECTOR'S CHOICE.
Mr. Merkel updated Commission members on the meetings to gain public input on Cinderella
City Mall. The first meeting was held on February 1; approximately 85 people were in atten-
dance, a considerable number of which were senior citizens. The meeting lasted approxi-
mately two hours, and there was a lot of good discussion. Other dates scheduled for public
input are February 10, 7 -9 A.M., February 12, 9 -11 A.M., and February 17, 5 -7 P.M.;
all meetings are scheduled at the Malley Center, 3380 South Lincoln Street. Members were
urged to attend at least one of these meetings. The follow-up meeting is scheduled for March
10, 7 -9 P.M., and the Englewood High School.
The groundbreaking for the relocation of the Englewood Depot was held at 10:00 A.M. on
this date. Mr. Covens stated that he understood once the building is renovated, that the
Chamber of Commerce offices will occupy the basement, and the Historical Society and mu-
seum will use the top floor. Funding efforts were discussed; Councilwoman Hathaway com-
mented that many sources of funding are being explored.
XI. COMMISSIONER'S CHOICE.
Mr. Covens acknowledged a list of meeting dates which was included in the packet. Meetings
which will be on Wednesdays because of Monday Holidays were noted.
Discussion on work projects for 1994 ensued. The Commission determined the need for a
study session regarding planning, the comprehensive plan, and how the efforts of the Com-
mission will mesh with the charge of Englewood By Design. This study session will be on
February 23 at 7:00 P.M.
13
Mr. Stitt stated that he had received a communication from Mr. Garrett, who will miss several
meetings because of work-related travel. Mr. Stitt commented on the policy on excused ab-
sences which was adopted by the Commission several years ago, and noted that Mr. Garrett
has given "previous notice" of his absences.
The meeting was declared adjourned at 10:10 P.M.
14