HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-04-07 PZC MINUTESCITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
APRIL 7, 1992
I. CALL TO ORDER.
The regular meeting of the Englewood Planning and Zoninq Commis-
sion was called to order by Chairman J. C. Schultz at ~:30 P.M.
in the City Council Chambers of Englewood City Hall.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Also Present:
Gerlick, Glynn, Leonard, Schultz, Shoop, To-
bin, Covens, Draper, Dummer
L. Martin, Ex-officio
None
Harold J. Stitt, Planner
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
March 17, 1992
Chairman Schultz stated that the Minutes of March 17, 1992 were
to be considered for approval.
Draper moved:
Shoop seconded: The Minutes of March 17, 1992 be approved as
written.
AYES: Glynn, Leonard, Shoop, Tobin, Covens, Draper, Dummer,
Gerlick, Schultz
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried.
III. SHINGLE RECYCLING OPERATIONS
I-1 and I-2 Zone Districts
CASE #3-92
Mr. Schultz announced that a public meeting has beeb scheduled
for this time to gain public input on whether shingle recycling
operations is a use that should or should not be permitted in the
I-1 and/or I-2 Industrial Zone Districts in the future. Mr.
Schultz emphasized that this meeting does not pertain to the ex-
isting shingle recycling operation known as Treecycle at 4 755
South Windermere Street. Treecycle is a permitted business under
the existing I-1 Zone District regulations, and the owner has
complied with all he has been asked to do. Mr. Schultz stated
that the Planning Commission, and City Council, want to determine
the concerns regarding this type of business, and whether changes
should be made in the permitted uses of the industrial zone
district. Mr. Schultz stated that persons wishing to address the
Commission will not be sworn in inasmuch as this is not a formal
Hearing, but he did ask that speakers come to the podium, iden-
tify themselves and their place of residence.
1
Mr. Schultz stated that he has been given a copy of the Public
Notice which was published in the Englewood Herald giving the
date, time, place, and purpose of this Public Meeting.
Mr. William E. Houghton, 4750 South Mariposa Drive, addressed the
Commission. Mr. Houghton stated that he lives in view of the re-
cycling operation on South Windermere; this is a "city dump" and
he has to look at it every day. He stated when the business
started he called the City, and was told that it would be gone in
two months. Mr. Houghton stated that the operation is a fire
hazard; only one fire hydrant has been installed, and there are
dry shingles and tar paper all over the site. He lives on the
windward side of this business, and if a fire started there the
residents to the east "wouldn't stand a chance." Mr. Houghton
stated he is of the further opinion that this operation is a good
habitat for rats and vermin. Mr. Houghton stated that he does
not like the operation; he bought his home for the view and now
there is a dump in his range of view and he is "sick of it."
There should not be a dump allowed within the City limits. He
stated that he would much prefer an indoor industrial use on the
site.
Mr. Covens inquired if the recycling operation has obstructed Mr.
Houghton's view of the mountains. Mr. Houghton stated that the
mountain view is not obstructed, but he does look over the recy-
cling operation. He stated that he has seen no "recycling" on
the site, only trailers going in with more shingles.
Ms. Tobin inquired of Mr. Houghton whether he had seen an in-
crease in rats and mice in his neighborhood. Mr. Houghton stated
that he has not seen any at his house, but that the shingle piles
are a good habitat for that type of rodent.
Mr. Larry Valtakis, 4675 South Lipan Street, addressed the Com-
mission. Mr. Valtakis spoke of his concerns about "crud" getting
into the reservoir and affecting the quality of the drinking wa-
ter during the recycling operations. He pointed ouf that some
shingles are ·coated with creosote which could create -a chemical
residue, and the tar paper which is on the site could also cause
a "caustic cloud" when destroyed. Mr. Valtakis also addressed
the volatile nature of the operation, noting that he has seen
small fires down by the railroad tracks. Mr. Valtakis stated
that he, also, is of the opinion that rats and mice will find
this a good habitat. He noted that there is a nature area in the
immediate area, and they do have some wildlife such as raccoons,
rabbits and skunks that frequent the area. Mr. Valtakis stated
that he has experienced two flat tires (roofing nails), and his
wife has had three flat tires. He stated that he has seen piles
of shingles along streets that have fallen off trailers headed to
the South Windermere site. Mr. Valtakis stated that in his opin-
ion, the recycling business could not be advantageous to the City
when it is this close to the water supply. He is of the opinion
that the recycling of shingles is out of place in the City. He
2
stated that the subject operation does not bother the view from
his residence, but he is aware that it is there. He cited a re-
cent instance when he saw smoke coming from this general direc-
tion; it turned out that it was a training fire, but the Engle-
wood Fire Department was not aware of it, and it took Englewood
11 15 -20 minutes to send a fire truck out to investigate". Mr.
Val takis stated that in his opinion, the site could be better
used for mechanical shops, printing shops, or some similar
"contained" use.
Mr. Schultz asked if Mr. Valtakis is of the opinion that future
recycling operations should be "indoor operations". Mr. Valtakis
stated that such uses should be completely contained; an outdoor
operation will encourage "wildlife".
Elmer Jungck, 4606 South Mariposa Drive, stated that he is of the
opinion the recycling operation has increased rats and mice in
the area, noting that he recently returned from a trip to find
bird seed scattered all over the garage. Mr. Jungck stated that
he had spoken to Mayor Wiggins, and was .told that the use would
be cleaned up within three months; instead, it .has been added to.
He and his wife have both had flat tires; the use presents a fire
hazard to the neighborhood. Mr. Jungck suggested that this site
should be developed as a natural area.
In response to a query from Mr. Covens, Mr. Jungck stated that he
has lived at this address for 31 years; they are on the east side
of the ditch and look over the recycling site.
Grace Gant, 4665 South Lipan Street, stated that she has lived at
this address for six years, and had never experienced a problem
with rodents until this year. Ms. Gant stated that she has been
very unhappy about the recycling operation, and was told by Mr.
Stitt that rodents would not be attracted by cedar shingles, and
the area would not be a habitat for rats and mice. Ms. Gant dis-
cussed her concerns about fire hazard, trash on the streets, flat
tires, and the general appearance of the site. Ms .. Gant stated
that she felt the site should be developed as a ·nursery.
Mr. Bill Nichols, 4670 South Lipan Street, stated that he has
lived in his house for 30 years, it is almost paid for, "and now
you bring in a dump! Thanks!" Mr. Nichols stated that he called
regarding this use last October, and was assured it would be gone
by the first of January. Mr. Nichols reported that he has talked
to City Council, City Manager's Office, and the Fire Department.
Mr. Nichols reiterated his description of the site as a "dump",
noting that there is tar paper, asphalt shingles, plastic bags,
tin, etc. on the site. Mr. Nichols' opinion of the "firelanes"
that were required of the operation as "bologna" --you can walk
down one of the fire lanes and touch the stacks of shingles on
both sides. He cannot believe the City needs this type of busi-
ness within the City limits. Mr. Nichols stated that he has
nothing against recycling, but this is a dump. He is a taxpayer,
and it will cost him money to clean up the site when the opera-
3
tors go "belly-up". Mr. Nichols cited two other metro cities who
have had to pay to clean up similar uses at taxpayer expense.
This use does not appeal to the citizens, and it is up to the
Planning Commission to listen to what they have to say.
Mr. Schultz asked if Mr. Nichols is of the opinion there should
not be recycling operations in the city in the future. Mr.
Nichols reiterated that he has nothing against recycling, but
there should be limits on it. He pointed out that we are ap-
proaching the hail season again, and the problem could be further
compounded if it is a bad season. This is an eyesore for the
residents of the area; there are homes right across the street
from it. He stated that he has not experienced any problem with
rodents, but reiterated that the use is an eyesore. Mr. Nichols
stated that he feels double-crossed because he was told the use
would cease, and it has continued.
Mr. Covens asked what two cities Mr. Nichols referred to. Mr.
Nichols stated that one of them was Lakewood. A gentleman in the
audience stated that Tiny Town had to pay to have a site cleaned
after the business operator walked off.
Mr. Covens cited the staff report wherein the · staff reported con-
tacting five other cities regarding permissibility of this use;
Lakewood was among those cities contacted. All communities indi-
cated shingle recycling would be permitted in their industrial
zones.
Mr. Schultz stated that he wanted to again clarify the purpose of
the public meeting, that being to consider the concerns regarding
shingle recycling operations as those concerns might pertain to
FUTURE operations. Concerns expressed at this meeting will have
NO impact on the operation of Treecycle. Mr. Schultz asked Mr.
Stitt to summarize the Treecycle operation and how it came into
being.
Mr. Stitt stated in April or May of 1991, staff was approached by
a woman interested in operating a "short-term" recycling opera-
tion at the subject site. At this time, she indicated-the opera-
tion would be four to five months in duration. Staff determined
that the use (processing) is a permitted use in the I-1 Zone Dis-
trict, and the business was allowed to open. Shortly thereafter,
the woman sold the business to Mr. Villareal; he also initially
indicated that the recycling operation would be of short dura-
tion. However, after he had been in the business for several
months, he determined that it is a viable business, there is a
market for the mulch and chips made from the recycled shingles,
and that he wanted to make this a full-time, permanent operation.
Mr. Stitt stated that when citizens called regarding the opera-
tion, staff transmitted to them the information that the staff
had at the time: if staff had been told the operation would
cease within a several month time, this was told to the caller.
Staff was not intentionally misleading citizens.
4
Mr. Stitt stated that staff has suggested four possible courses
of action, those being:
1. Propose that an amendment be made to the Comprehensive Zon-
ing Ordinance which would prohibit the recycling of cedar
shingles in the I-1 and I-2 Industrial Zone Districts.
2. Propose that an amendment be made to the Comprehensive Zon-
ing Ordinance that would make the recycling of cedar shin-
gles a Conditional Use.
3. Propose that an amendment be made to the Comprehensive Zon-
ing Ordinance that would maintain the recycling of cedar
shingles as a permitted use subject to certain restrictions.
4. Leave the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as it is, thus al-
lowing the recycling of cedar shingles as a permitted use.
Mr. Schultz asked if there were other questions from the audience
regarding the issue of recycling shingles~
An unidentified gentleman in the audience asked about the taking
of right-of-way from the Treecycle site by the State Highway De-
partment, and whether this would eliminate the present use. Mr.
Stitt stated that some property will be taken for right-of-way, a
bridge will be constructed over Big Dry Creek, and the roadway
will be raised. The amount of right-of-way to be taken from this
site is undetermined, but could be as little as 10 feet or as
much as 30 feet. Mr. Stitt questioned that the taking of this
right-of-way would impact the ability to continue the present use
of the property.
Irene Jungck, 4606 South Mariposa Drive, asked how many of the
Commission have been down to the area and viewed the subject
site. All nine members of the Commission raised their hands in
the affirmative. Mrs. Jungck stated that it is unfortunate the
City allowed I-1 and I-2 industrial districts to . abut R-1-A,
Single-family zoning in Englewood; there should have been a
buffer between these incompatible districts.
Mr. Schultz agreed that the integrity of residential districts
should be protected, and that the City does try to have buffer
zones between unlike zones. However, this has not been done in
all instances and buff er requirements cannot now be required
retroactively.
Mrs. Jungck further discussed the problems experienced by the
residents of the area in dealing with the industrial development
that has occurred since they purchased their properties. Screen-
ing was to be provided on the north side of Tufts to soften the
visual impact of the industrial development; the screening has
never been provided.
5
Mr. Covens asked for a show of hands of those who have experi-
enced flat tires in this area. Seven people indicated they have
had flat tires after driving through this immediate area.
Mayor Clyde Wiggins, 4975 South Inca ·Drive, stated that the
Treecycle operation is in his District, and that he has received
numerous telephone calls regarding this business. Mr. Wiggins
stated that he does not like the operation, but the intent of the
meeting is "what do we do in the future." He pointed out that
the Tri-Cities Planning Group is working to clean up the Santa Fe
Corridor, and the appearance of this business will not be attrac-
tive from Santa Fe. Mr. Wiggins stated that he has spoken to Mr.
Villareal; they have recently received the new grinders which are
now in operation. He stated that he does see some progress in
recycling the shingles, but it is slow. Mr. Wiggins stated that
he does want to see some restrictions imposed on future recycling
operations in the City, such as screening, limiting height of
stacks, limiting the size of the operation, etc. Mr. Wiggins
stated that the mulch and chips will be sold in bulk or bagged,
and while the operation is "looking good now", he implored the
operators to decrease the piles of shingles, and hoped we do not
experience another devastating hail storm.
Councilwoman Alex Habenicht, 515 West Tufts Avenue, stated that
she is a resident of the area, and it is her understanding that
the area north of West Tufts Avenue does have some specific
covenants regarding I-1 development. She suggested the possibil-
ity of using covenants regarding development south of Tufts,
also. Maybe consideration should be given to requiring that uses
be roofed, enclosed, etc. Ms. Habenicht pointed out that resi-
dents to the east do look down on the Treecycle operation.
Mr. Covens asked if Ms. Habenicht had any input from the Fire De-
partment regarding the installation of the fire hydrant and the
fire lanes; were a fire to occur, would it be containable. Ms.
Habenicht stated that the Fire Marshal has said that it is within
the Fire Code. Ms. Habenicht understood that the shingles are
"doused" frequently to keep them moist. Ms. Habenicht stressed
the need to consider the issue very carefully; we really need to
have a clear answer why this operation is not considered a fire
hazard. She commented that we are working with minimal informa-
tion and not a full report.
Ms. Tobin asked if Treecycle was processing materials as fast as
they come in. Mr. Villareal stated that they are not processing
at the same rate as in-take; they have had problems with the ma-
chinery, but the grinders are now operable and he feels the oper-
ation is on the up-swing.
Ms. Tobin asked if the income of the business comes only from
sales. Mr. Villareal stated there is also a tipping fee when the
shingles are brought in; this is in addition to the income from
sales of mulch and chips.
6
Mr. Villareal discussed the operation. He stated that nails are
extracted by magnets; tar paper is removed by hand. Trucks are
required to be covered, but nails do drop out. He stated that he
has never experienced a flat tire at the site, but acknowledged
that this is a valid point raised by the citizens. Ms. Tobin
asked if Mr. Villareal was "open to reimburse people for the
flats." Mr. Villareal indicated this was an issue to be consid-
ered, but did not commit. Mr. Villareal stated that the main
thrust of the operation is the recycling of cedar shingles; he
does not want "dirty material", and drivers that try to unload
unacceptable items are reprimanded and items have been reloaded
onto their trucks.
Ms. Gant asked why, when they have been promised the piles will
be gone, do they never go down. Steve Schluchter, partner in
Treecycle, stated that they have contracted with Don Cameron, who
has brought in equipment from Canada. This equipment is now in
operation, and residents will see a decrease in the height of the
piles, as well as keeping up with incoming materials. Mr.
Schluchter invited the citizens to visit the operation and see
what they are doing.
Mr. Houghton stated that the piles have gotten higher, and it's
just gotten worse.
Mr. Villareal stated that he has over $500,000 invested in this
business, and he does not plan to let the piles remain. Mr. Vil-
lareal further pointed out that the property was zoned I-1, Light
Industrial, and he is not doing anything that is not permitted in
the existing zoning. Mr. Villareal stated that he also is paying
taxes, plus has provided jobs for up to 14 people.
Mr. Covens asked about the market for the mulch. Mr. Villareal
stated that it is being marketed for landscaping and ground cover
purposes.
Mrs. Leonard asked about the rodent issue; have they seen rats on
the premises. Mr. Villareal stated that he saw on~ :rat in the
house, but there were also food scraps in the house. ~There have
been no further sightings of rats on the premises. He stated
that they still have raccoons and rabbits around the site, but
rats do not feed on cedar shingles.
An unidentified gentleman from the audience asked who would pay
for additional fire protection if the Commission allows this use
to continue. Mr. Villareal stated he understood there was a co-
operative agreement on fire fighting services between four juris-
dictions. Mr. Villareal further discussed the installation of
the fire hydrant, and the fact that the f irelanes are 20 feet in
width. These firelanes are east/west and north/south.
Mr. Shoop asked if Mr. Villareal was comfortable with the level
of fire danger on the site. Mr. Villareal stated that in his
7
opinion the fire lanes provide more airways which could fuel a
fire were one to occur.
Mr. Frizzell, Treecycle, discussed the sales of compost and
ground cover, and the agreement with Mr. Cameron on the use of
the grinding machinery. The ground cover will help control
weeds, and will retain moisture. This is a new type of business,
and they understand the concerns of residents, but it is a good
operation in that it is removing shingles from the landfills and
putting them to use.
Ms. Tobin inquired about the length of the agreement with Mr.
Cameron. Mr. Schluchter stated it is a six month agreement.
Mr. Frizzell addressed the issue that had been raised regarding
contaminants that may have been used to treat shingles, and sub-
mitted to Chairman Schultz copies of reports from the Industrial
Laboratories, Colorado Analytical Laboratory, and letters from
Texas Forest Service (The Texas A & M University system) , and
Colorado State University Soil Testing Laboratory.
Ms. Martin addressed the Commission, noting that quite a bit of
testimony has been received from those present regarding concerns
of the recycling business. The purpose of the public meeting was
to get input to consider in determining whether future recycling
businesses should be allowed in the · I-1 or I-2 zone districts.
Ms. Martin stated that she would suggest that staff further con-
sider Options #2 and #3 as previously outlined by Mr. Stitt, fur-
ther research what other communities do in regard to recycling
operations, consider the concerns that have been voiced this
evening and ways to address those concerns, talk to other indi-
viduals who are in the recycling business, and come up with spe-
cific proposals and ideas to bring back to the Commission for
further discussion. Ms. Martin suggested that the citizens also
be invited to attend the discussions.
Mr. Villareal stated that he would like to be involved in this
gathering of information; he reiterated that he does plan to con-
tinue his business at the present location. There are a lot of
things that can be recycled and he would like to be a part of de-
veloping standards for the recycling businesses.
Mr. Covens asked if Mr. Villareal would be willing to post a per-
formance bond to cover expenses were the City to have to clean
the lot if he left prior to completion of a clean-up. Mr. Vil-
lareal stated he would want to discuss this with his attorney.
Mr. Covens asked if Mr. Villareal were considering some type of
screening or fencing in his Planned Development. Mr. Villareal
stated that they have submitted a landscape plan to staff, which
indicates 1 tree to be planted for every 40 foot of frontage; the
plan will also address signage, employee parking, and possible
fencing. Mr. Draper suggested that Mr. Villareal might want to
talk to Waste Management regarding trees; when their PD was ap-
8
proved they indicated they were storing trees off-site. Ms. To-
bin suggested that Mr. Villareal might also contact the Arapahoe
County Extension Agent; she understood they have a program to
provide trees and shrubs very inexpensively.
Further brief discussion ensued. Mr. Schultz thanked members of
the audience for attending and expressing their concerns regard-
ing recycling operations. There will be further discussions re-
garding the issue before any recommendation is made to Council,
and members of the audience were welcome to attend the Commission
meetings at any time.
* * * * * * * * * *
Mr. Schultz declared a brief recess.
* * * * * * * * * *
The meeting reconvened. All members were present.
IV. SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER CASE #2-92
Planned Development Amendment #3
Chairman Schultz stated that the Public Hearing, opened on March
3, 1992, was continued to March 17, 1992, and was again continued
to this date. All persons previously sworn in to give testimony
are still sworn. Mr. Schultz asked that staff continue with the
presentation.
Mr. Stitt entered into the record the Certification of Posting.
Mr. Stitt then directed the attention of the Commission to the
Staff Report, particularly Pages 7 and 8 which contain the condi-
tions for approval of the Planned Development Amendment #3. The
traffic impact analysis has been completed, and a number of these
recommendations are a result of that analysis. Mr .. Stitt then
reviewed each of the recommendations with the Commission.
Mr. Dummer asked whether the .area for valet parking on the first
floor of the garage would be separated from that used by doctors
and staff. Mr. Stitt stated that he understood it would be inte-
grated, and that persons accessing the garage from the north will
not be able to access the first floor level of the garage. Mr.
Stitt did suggest that it may be necessary to increase the area
required for valet parking.
The increase of radii on the NE and SE corners of South Logan
Street and East Hampden Avenue was discussed.
Ms. Tobin asked about the impact the removal of on-street parking
will have on the small businesses on the south side of East Hamp-
den Avenue. Mr. Stitt stated that this will have to be consid-
ered, and that the business owners will be involved in the ulti-
9
mate determination. He further stated that we are not committed
to making this change, but it is a possibility.
Ms. Tobin inquired if the turning movements into MOB IV will ac-
commodate vans. Mr. Stitt answered in the affirmative.
Left-turn lanes will be needed in the future, but a definitive
traffic flow pattern will have to be established prior to deter-
mining whether left-turn lanes are needed on all points of an in-
tersection. Signals will also have to be modified to accommodate
the left-turn movements. Mr. Stitt pointed out that East Hampden
Avenue is a through street, and a major point of access to the
Safeway complex; turning movements will have to be accommodated
on this street, as well as turning movements at Broadway and Gi-
rard. Crosswalk protection on Lincoln and Girard Avenue is
needed for the elderly residents crossing to and from Orchard
Place, Simon Center, and Malley Center.
Mr. Stitt stated that staff does recommend approval of Planned
Development Amendment #3 with the inclusion of the 14 conditions
as outlined in the Staff Report.
Mr. Draper discussed the problem of motorists making a left turn
from southbound Logan into the parking garage. Mr. Stitt stated
that signage could be placed indicating that left-turn movements
mid-block are prohibited, and this block. could be monitored. Mr.
Shoop inquired whether the signage would be the responsibility of
Swedish Medical Center, or of the City. Mr. Stitt stated that
both entities would be installing signage~
Ms. Leonard inquired where those who choose not to use valet
parking were to park. Mr. Stitt stated they would have to use
the upper levels of the parking garage, accessed from South Penn-
sylvania Street on the north.
Mr. Dummer inquired whether it would be possible to have a "card"
that could be used by patients wanting to use the valet parking
area but not have the valet park their vehicle~ and the card be
returned after accessing through the gate. Mr. Stitt stated that
this procedure could create problems.
Mr. Dan Weyland, duly sworn, stated that they feel the same con-
cerns voiced by the Commission. The lower level of the garage
can be "controlled'' in one sense in that the majority of traffic
in and out will be valet parking. They have gone to great
lengths to provide convenient parking for their doctors, and the
parking in the lower level of the garage may be segregated to po-
sition the medical personnel vehicles to provide easier access to
the hospital. He stated that if there are problems with medical
personnel making left-turning movements from South Logan Street
mid-block, he felt this could be controlled by admonishing them
it cannot be done. Regarding the special card mentioned by Mr.
Dummer, he estimated that less than 50% of the patients would
choose to park their own vehicles. The valet parking has been
10
very successful at the other medical office buildings, and was
offered as a temporary service initially; it was so successful
they have made it a permanent service offered at their office
buildings. Mr. Weyland further noted the bridge which will link
the garage to MOB IV. Mr. Weyland stated that when the tenancy
of MOB IV has been fully determined, mailings will be sent to pa-
tients which will include a map of the area and how to access the
garage and MOB IV from the garage.
Mr. Shoop questioned the 27% figure for landscaping. Mr. Stitt
stated that staff is considering the campus as a ''whole", and 25%
of the total site must be landscaped. With the addition of MOB
IV, the percentage of the total site which is landscaped is 27%,
and is in excess of the minimum requirement.
Mr. Schultz asked if there were further questions of Mr. Stitt.
He then asked SMC representatives to address the Commission.
Ms. Tobin asked where package delivery people were to park. Mr.
David Rhyne, previously sworn, indicated -on the plans where de-
livery vans were to unload. There is also some "staging" space
so there should be sufficient area for vans and. vehicles dropping
off patients.
Mr. Gerlick asked Mr. Rhyne if SMC representatives were familiar
with the Staff Report and the conditions contained therein, and
whether those conditions were agreeable. Mr. Rhyne stated they
were familiar with the Staff Report and conditions, having re-
ceived a copy of said Report last week. He indicated that their
staff will work with the City on c6mpliance with the conditions.
Ms. Tobin asked whether Swedish owned properties on the south
side of Hampden Avenue that may be affected by on-street parking
removal. Mr. Stitt displayed a portion of the Plan which indi-
cates properties owned by Swedish on the south side of Hampden.
Brief discussion ensued.
Draper moved:
Tobin seconded: The Public Hearing on Case #2-92 be closed.
AYES: Leonard, Shoop, Tobin, Covens, Draper, Dummer, Gerlick,
Glynn, Schultz
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried.
Mr. Schultz asked the pleasure of the Commission.
Covens moved:
Tobin seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City
Council that the Planned Development Amend-
ment #3 for MOB IV, filed by Swedish Medical
11
Center be approved, with the following condi-
tions.
1. Installation of a new fire hydrant at the northeast corner
of South Logan Street and East Hampden Avenue.
2. Installation of the fire department connection for the fire
sprinkler system in MOB IV at the west end of the south
wall.
3. The hammerhead turn-around shall be 72 feet from end to end
to allow for adequate fire pumper turning.
4. Minimum vertical clearance underneath the pedestrian bridge
which connects MOB IV to the existing parking structure at
South Logan Street and East Girard Avenue must be 13 feet 6
inches to allow Fire Division vehicles access to the fire
hydrant and fire department connection at the west side of
the C.C.U. addition to Swedish Medical Center.
5. Field locate the City Ditch and show its location on the
Planned Development.
6. The fire hydrant required by the Fire Department must be in-
stalled by the developer, and shall be owned by the City.
Further, it must be installed to City specifications, and be
in an easement dedicated to the City.
7. The parking structure access from South Logan Street shall
remain controlled by gates. In addition to doctors, the ac-
cess should allow valet attendants when parking cars.
8. The one-way connection from the garage to the delivery dock
area, used by the valet personnel when retrieving cars,
shall be controlled by the gate (see revised Site Plan).
9. Due to significant increase in the traffic activity at the
intersection of East Hampden Avenue and South Logan Street,
the radii at the NE corner and the SE corner (presently 15
feet or 20 feet respectively) shall be improved. New ra-
diuses shall be in the range of approximately 35 feet. This
will require the acquisition of additional right-of-way at
both corners. Furthermore, the Coastal gas station sign at
the NE corner needs to be relocated. These improvements
should be coordinated with the current signal upgrade pro-
ject by SMC.
10. New striping and signing at the intersection of East Hampden
Avenue and South Pennsylvania Street, and on East Hampden
Avenue between South Logan Street and South Pearl Street
will be needed.
12
The following modifications shall be implemented in the future
when the traffic conditions change to the point where the pro-
posed actions are appropriate:
11. The intersection of South Logan Street and East Girard Av-
enue to be restriped to accommodate the installation of left
turn bays, including appropriate signalization modifica-
tions.
12. Modification of left turn signal installations at the inter-
section of East Hampden Avenue and South Logan Street to ac-
commodate exclusive movements.
13. The installation of southbound left turn signals at the in-
tersection of South Broadway and East Girard Avenue to allow
exclusive left turn movement.
14. The installation of flashing warning lights near the cross-
walk at the intersection of East Girard Avenue and South
Lincoln Street, which is heavily us.ed by elderly people as
necessitated by increased traffic volumes .on East Girard Av-
enue.
AYES: Shoop, Tobin, Covens, Draper, Dummer, Gerlick, Glynn,
Leonard, Schultz
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried.
V. PUBLIC FORUM.
There was no one present to address the Commission.
VI. DIRECTOR'S CHOICE.
Ms. Martin stated that City Council will hold their annual goals
and objectives meeting on April 11 in preparation for the 1993
Budget process. She will be representing Community Development
and the Planning Commission at this session. Ms. Martin stated
that in conversations with City Manager Fraser, Planning & Zoning
Commission members, Mr. Stitt, and various citizens, they have
come up with a proposal to have the Planning Commission become
more focused in a long-term "visionary" role vs. the typical
"reactionary" role. This may entail working through a process
that will expand on the Comprehensive Plan. Staff proposes rec-
ommending to City Council an increase in the Planning budget;
this may result in additional personnel to do writing, hold
"focus meetings", etc. The initial focus would be the Comprehen-
sive Plan; the goals from the 1979 Plan will be given to City
Council to determine if they concur that these goals are still
applicable. If the determination is that the goals do still ap-
ply, the staff and Commission will move on to revision of the
13
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; but if the Council wants a change
in the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, then the Commission
should consider redoing the Plan in "total", which could be a 12
-18 month work program.
Ms. Tobin asked if the Commission was to proceed on this work
program with no new Director on board. Ms. Martin discussed the
recent reorganization of the Department, which will free Mr.
Stitt from obligations to the Neighborhood Services Division, and
allow full time concentration on Planning issues.
Mr. Covens stated that he understood the Chief Planner would re-
port to Public Works Director Esterly. Ms. Martin stated that
this is not correct; the Planner will report to her as acting Di-
rector of Community Development. Ms. Martin stated that if the
proposal as outlined here is approved by City Council, the addi-
tional resources would not be in place until the 1993 budget
year.
Ms. Tobin pointed out that a new Depart~ent Head may not have the
same goals as the administration. Ms. Martin suggested that this
is unlikely, inasmuch as someone who was uncomfortable with the
goals of the administration and Council would not be hired.
Mr. Covens pointed out that the Commission has revised the Hous-
ing Section; they have considered the Economic Development sec-
tion, which can be a section on its own. Parks & Recreation has
not brought in the "big picture" at this point in time.
Ms. Martin pointed out that staff is talking about a vision
statement, and not detail at this point. Right now, staff does
not know whether City Council does or does not support the goals
of the 1979 Comprehensive Plan.
Ms. Tobin pointed out that the Housing Section was redone, and
there were changes made to this section. She did not want to see
past work discarded. Ms. Martin stated that this past work would
not be "discarded'', but perhaps expanded upon.
Mr. Schultz stated that he had met with Ms. Martin and Mr. Stitt
to discuss the direction of Planning in Englewood. They dis-.
cussed the role of the Planning Commission in the future, noting
that there is little to no vacant land to develop, we have
schools, roads, etc., and what benefit can the Planning Commis-
sion be to the City. A lot of ideas came up which he felt were
"dynamite" ideas, and if the Commission could take on a little
different role, do more "long-term vision" planning and not get
caught up in the "immediate" issues it could be very challenging.
Mr. Schultz acknowledged that the immediate issues will also have
to be addressed. Nothing will be "thrown away", but it would be
a revamping of the mission of the Commission to that of "act"
rather than "react". Mr. Schultz agreed the parameters of the
proposal are vague because we do not yet have the approval of
City Council and ensuing additional resources.
14
proposal are vague because we do not yet have the approval of
City Council and ensuing additional resources.
Ms. Tobin stated that, in her opinion, every time a study session
was scheduled in the last year, it was cancelled by staff. There
is a need to allot time to work on such things as the Comprehen-
sive Plan.
Mr. Covens stated that we are now two years behind schedule to
revise the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that he is not against
"vision", but there are "meat and potatoes that need fine tun-
ing".
Discussion ensued. Mr. Glynn pointed out that Ms. Martin has
stated this is only a proposal to be made to City Council, and
that part of the problem with not getting things done may be a
lack of funding. Mr. Schultz agreed.
Mr. Stitt pointed out that a Comprehensive Plan is required by
State Statute; it is a guide for growth and development of a com-
munity. The question is whether the Commission wants to "update"
every ten years, or get an "in ·depth study" of the City and the
current goals and desires of the residents~
Mr. Draper stated there is a need to get the citizenry involved.
Mr. Stitt stated that 6n past plans, there have been probably at
least 100 people who have served on ad hoc committees; this is a
long process. Mr. Stitt stressed "there is nothing magic about
10 years" --a Plan may be revised or rewritten more often than
this. Mr. Stitt stressed the fact that a Plan must be adaptable,
and one must be careful that it is not "concrete" or too de-
tailed.
Mr. Schultz stated that this is one reason he liked the approach
of redoing it a section at a time.
Mr. Stitt stated that the Tri-Cities Planning Group is the first
solid planning effort that has occurred in quite some : time. Mr.
Schultz stated that the Commission and Council also have to con-
sider that this is a metropolitan area, and we have to consider
what is going on in adjacent jurisdictions. Ms. Tobin pointed
out that Englewood is a Home Rule City, because "we don't want to
be part of Denver". Mr. Schultz stated that we still have to
consider such as through streets to carry traffic from one juris-
diction to another, and address similar concerns.
Ms. Martin stated that the suggestion is to put more resources
into the Planning aspect of what is Englewood. She would like to
take the idea to City Council to determine if they will support
additional funding for Planning; there is no way to determine how
Council will react to the proposal. The goals and objectives
session will be at the Manor House at KenCaryl, and is a public
meeting. Ms. Martin emphasized that she is trying to get ap-
15
proval of a "concept" now, and have a basis for requesting addi-
tional funding in September.
Mr. Covens asked if the support to fund Tri-Cities Planning Group
part of this proposal, or separate. Ms. Martin stated that this
is a separate issue.
Ms. Martin then reported the results of the recent Citizen Survey
have been tabulated, and will be made available to members in
their next packet.
The Farmer's Market will no longer be located in Englewood; they
have found a new location in University Hills Plaza. Concerted
efforts were made to find a new location for them in Englewood,
but we were not successful and they needed a commitment early on
to get publicity out, etc. Staff will now work toward getting
shuttle service for senior citizens who want to shop the Farmer's
Market.
Council will have a Revenue Task Force, which will report back to
City Council in August. This task force will be looking at what
revenues we should pursue, modify, etc. . Mr. Schultz inquired
about the 1/2% sales tax. Ms. Martin stated that this must be re-
viewed every six months according to Ordinance, but will probably
be included in the discussions.
Ms. Martin reported on a meeting with RTD, at which meeting RTD
said it would be 1995 at the earliest before there would be con-
struction of the system to Burkhart Steel. Light Rail on Santa
Fe is not a reality unless Federal Funding · and local matching
funds can be obtained.
Ms. Martin reported on Project Rebuild, which is the upgrading of
existing small homes. City Council has put $100, 000 into this
fund; federal funds are to be matched. The improvements and ex-
pansion can be "pop-top", or whatever the Zoning ·Ordinance al-
lows.
Ms. Martin stated that 42 citizens attended the Coun~il meeting
of April 6 regarding problems with a roofing contractor.
The Friday Night Live program for kids 9 -14 years of age has
begun at the Recreation Center. Youngsters are expected to be-
have, or they are put in detention until they can be picked up by
their parents. They are not allowed out of the building from the
time the program begins until they are picked up by the parent.
The program hours are from 6 P.M. to 10 P.M.
The Paving District was passed on first reading.
The Strategic Plan Resolution supporting the Tri-Cities Planning
Group was also approved by City Council.
The new Bookmobile will be delivered next week.
16
The Concrete District was tabled until the next Council Meeting.
VII. COMMISSIONER'S CHOICE.
Mr. Shoop stated that there have been three separate sets of
plans on the SMC PD Amendment #3; he asked how many of these
could be destroyed, and whether they can be recycled. Mr. Stitt
asked that all plans be returned to staff; we will then sort out
the latest plan for submission to City Council and dispose of the
remainder.
Mr. Covens inquired about an update on the recycling project.
Ms. Martin stated that City Council is to get a report on the
SMART Grant in late April.
Mr. Covens inquired about the Forington property on West Evans
Avenue. Mr. Stitt stated that he has had further discussions
with Mr. Forington, and that it will be necessary to look at the
entire area, not just one property. Mr. _Covens suggested it ap-
peared this is another area where there is need for a buff er
zone.
Ms. Leonard stated that she will be unable to attend the meeting
on April 21 because of a conference she has to attend.
There was nothing further to come before the Commission, and the
meeting was declared adjourned at 9:30 P.M.
'~w~~
Recording Secretary
17