Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-09-09 PZC MINUTESI ' I MINUTES OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING September 9, 1975 The meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 5:35 by Chairman Arthur Martin, Jr. Roll call indi- cated the following: Commissioners Present: Arthur Martin, Chairman Eddie Tanguma, Vice Chairman Judith Pierson Mae Wade George Jorgenson Lee R. Jones Edward G. Smith Howard R. Brown Chalmerse A. Parker Commissioners Absent: None Others Present: Dorothy A. Romans, Acting Director, Department of Community Development Steve House, Planning Associate Karl Nollenberger, Assistant City Manager William James, Director of Finance George McLaughlin, Representative of Westinghouse Corporation Action on the minutes of City Planning and Zoning Commission meetings of August 12, 19 and 26, 1975 was requested by Chairman Martin. Eddie Tanguma moved, and Howard Brown seconded, TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 12, AUGUST 19 AND AUGUST 26, 1975 AS WRITTEN. Before voting, Mr. Martin questioned page 12, fourth paragraph of the August 19 minutes: "Mr. Carroll stated that the 1975 budget for the Water Fund will be $1,400,000 with little more than half in operating expenses." He wondered if this should have been 1976 rather than 1975. Mrs. Romans said she would contact Mr. Carroll to clarify this point. On call of the roll, the following voted "aye": Smith, Tanguma, Wade, Brown, Jones, Jorgenson, Martin and Pierson. Mr. Parker had not arrived at the meeting ·at the time the vote was taken. The motion carried. Mrs. Romans introduced Mr. George McLaughlin, representative of the Westinghouse Corporation, whose attendance at the meeting concerned the possible development of a site on the northwest corner of Cherokee and Kenyon by his firm. Development of this site, with a multi-family unit, had been considered previously by the property owner, Mr. Mel Denning. His plans for parking were approved, but because of financing I problems, the plans for the unit were altered. The second $et of pla~s was also approved; however, Mr. Denning was not able I to go ahead with his plans because of the economic situation. At this time, this site is unzoned because of the repeal of the R-3-B Zone District, Mrs. Romans reported, and is proposed to be zoned R-3, High-Density Residence. This District also permits professional offices. She said that "professional" has been de- fined as including medical doctors, dentists, attorneys-at-law, architects or engineers. Mr. McLaughlin's firm will consist of professional engineers and support staff. She said that it was believed that Mr. McLaughlin's proposal, since his firm is a branch of a large corporation, should be discussed with the Commission to determine their feelings. She added that, while Mr. Denning had talked about a seven-story high-rise, Mr. McLaughlin is considering only a one-or two-story building. Mr. McLaughlin spoke of garage parking, and said the person who will build the structure had agreed with this. Along with the garage parking, they antici pate some outside parking on the balance of the lot. They are not planning on street parking at all. They will have very little customer-to-office contact, since most of their work is accomplished in the office of the client, which could be any place in the greater metropolitan Denver area. Mr. McLaughlin assured the Commission that there would be no problems with ingress or egress, in view of the limited traffic to and from their office. Mr. Martin asked whether or not some of the parking would be under the building, and Mr. McLaughlin answered that probably 80 per cent would be under the building, with the balance on the site. The lot, he said, is of a size where there could be outside parking. He said they do not anticipate, or want, street parking. Mr. McLaughlin said that their building developer was not able to attend this meeting, but would be happy to submit his plans. Mr. Martin commented that a business such as Westinghouse would be a boon to the Englewood area. Mr. McLaughlin stated that the company has a research and devel- opment group at Hampden and Wadsworth which could go to two hundred or more people; however, there is very little growth potential in the part of the company he represents. The proposed building, he said, would be adequate for the next twenty years. In answer to Mr. Martin's question, Mr. McLaughlin stated that they expect to begin construction in about six months, and an- ticipate moving in in about a year, based on what he has been told by the developer. Mr. Smith asked whether Westinghouse would own the property, and was told that they would not; the initial lease will run to 2 ' I \ • ' I a minimum of 1982; however, the owner of the building may ask for a ten or fifteen year lease. Mr. McLaughlin added that he is anxious to remain in Englewood. Upon further questioning by Mrs. Pierson concerning ownership of the lease and site, Mr. Mc- Laughlin explained ownership policies of his company, and what changes will be made in their locations. In no case, he said, does his company own the land on which their offices are located, with the possible exception of some of the manufacturing plants in Eastern locations. Mrs. Pierson asked whether there is an option on this site, and Mr. McLaughlin said that he was waiting until the use of the land, as a professional office, is clarified before he proceeds. Mr. Tanguma asked what type of advertising sign would be used, and Mr. McLaughlin stated that, since they do not encourage people to come into the building, there would be a minimum sign for identification, but none for advertising. Mrs. Pierson asked what the role of the Commission is in this matter, and Mrs. Romans explained that the whole intent of the meeting is to establish whether, in the opinion of the Commission, the use is permitted. Development plans would have to be filed. She was asked how much property is involved, and answered that it was not quite an acre. Mr. Jones asked whether or not the City had re-routed the course of the ditch. Steve House replied that it is still the same course, and discussion ensued on this point, and also on the question of what direction the building would face. Mr. McLaughlin felt that his firm would be able to accept whatever the Commission would decide. He said he would favor the building fronting on the less-travelled street, ·South Cherokee. Mr. Tanguma commented that he would favor this type of develop- ment coming into Englewood, and particularly in that area. Mr. Jones agreed that this would be preferable to a multi-family development. Mrs. Romans made reference to two very beautiful evergreen trees on the site, and was concerned that the trees might be destroyed in building. Mr. McLaughlin suggested that a stipulation be made in the contract that the trees remain. Discussion followed as to whether or not the trees could be saved, and whether they would be in the path of the building. The general feeling was that it would be possible and desirable to allow the trees to remain in place. Motion was made by Edward Smith that IT SHOULD BE STIPULATED THAT THE TWO EVERGREEN TREES AT THE SITE OF THE PROPOSED WESTINGHOUSE DEVELOPMENT BE SAVED, IF IT IS FEASIBLE. The motion was seconded by Eddie Tanguma. on-the vote, the following voted "aye": Pierson; Smith; Tanguma; Wade, Brown; Jones; Jorgenson; Martin and Parker. Voting "No": None. The motion carried unanimously. 3 At this point, Mr. McLaughlin was excused, and there was a short break for dinner, after which the meeting reconvened at 6:40 P.M • Mrs. Romans reported that the City Council had asked the Planning Department to look at the area bounded by East Oxford Avenue, West Kenyon Avenue, the Broadway-Lincoln Alley, and the Sherman- Grant Alley. A meeting will be held in the Council Chambers on Thursday evening at 7:30 P.M. with residents of the area. She asked that as many of the Commission members as possible be present at this meeting. This area has been zoned R-2-A, and the point of discussion is to be whether or not the area should be zoned for two-family dwellings or for single-family u~~ in the upcoming zoning hearings. There are some duplexes in the area at the present time, she said. The people will be meeting with the staff, but the Planning and Zoning Commission may find the discussion of interest. This issue was discussed. Mr. Mar- tin said that there would be a more clear picture after Thurs- day's meeting, and asked that the Commission members be called on that day to remind them of the meeting. Mrs. Romans distributed copies of a proposed resolution declar- ing support of the 104-unit Elderly High Rise building by the Planning and Zoning Commission. It was her suggestion that, if the resolution met with the Commission's approval, it could be signed and returned to the Housing Authority. Mr. Martin asked for any changes or additions. There being none, Mrs. Pierson moved TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED REGARDING THE 104-UNIT HIGH RISE ELDERLY APARTMENTS. The motion was seconded by Eddie Tanguma. The vote was as follows: "Ayes: Parker; Pierson; Smith; Tanguma; Wade; Brown; Jones; Jorgenson and Martin. "Nays": None. The motion carried unanimously. A resolution regarding former Assistant City Attorney George Lee, who had been appointed by the Governor to be District Judge was discussed. Mrs. Pierson had prepared a draft resolution; said she felt the resolution as presented was not formal enough, and wanted suggestions as to what should be included. Several sug- gestions were made and Mrs. Pierson agreed to prepare a resolu- tion before the next Commission meeting. • ' Mrs. Romans stated that the next regularly scheduled meeting would be September 16th. About the only matter that would be on the agenda would be the requests to the Highway Department for the 1976-77 work program. The staff still needs information from the Highway Department, D.R.C.O.G., and the County Engin- eers, and Mrs. Romans expressed concern that the information would not be received in time to get it to the Commissioners prior to the 16th. She was trying to contact those having the information in order to find out what cagegories are included. She reviewed what was completed last year, and said she would try to determine what should be included. This must be turned over to City Council by October 6th, and Mrs. Romans felt that if at least another week were allowed, the staff would be in a better position to get the report to the Commission before that I time. Mrs. Wade felt the meeting should be moved one or two 4 • ' I weeks to allow more time. Mr. Martin asked whether the meeting should be set for September 23rd or 30th, and after some discus- sion it was determined that the next Planning and Zoning Commis- sion meeting should be September 30th at 7:00 P.M. Mrs. Romans stated that there has been a request for I-3, Heavy Industrial, zoning on the south side of West Union Avenue. This application is on behalf of Rockwell Concrete and a Mr. Canfield. The hearing was to have been set for the October 7th meeting, but the applicant has not submitted all of the necessary infor- mation. When this is received, she said, a date can be set. Mrs. Wade, referring to the River Redevelopment Project, ~sked how close this would be to the subject property. Mrs. Romans answered that the river would be about six hundred feet east of the subject property. She added that the thing of most concern is that the Canfield property is landlocked, and to zone it I-3 is of concern. Chairman Martin introduced a review of the Capital Improvements Program, saying that requests had been discussed with each de- partment head, which should give the Commission a good idea as to what priority bases should be used in recommendations to the City Manager. Mrs. Romans stated that on the previous evening, the Englewood Centennial-Bicentennial Committee met with City Council. She reported that the Council has been asked to underwrite a pro- fessional fund-raiser to raise money to help pay for E.C.B.C. projects. In raising funds, there is a need for a project which will hold appeal for the people. Three categories to be estab- lished in the drive are: 1) Special gifts; 2) Telephone cam- paign; 3) Mailing campaign. She said there had been some dis- cussion about Little Dry Creek development, and most felt that few people would be concerned with this. The feeling was that a Community Center would be of more interest. There was dis- cussion of asking City Council to match three-to-one what is raised in this campaign, an expected amount of approximately $80,000. There is also a possibility of some funds from the State Centennial-Bicentennial Commission. The Community Center will amount to about $2,200,000, which does not include cost of operation. Mr. Jones said that from the standpoint of Council's general concurrence, this would be a desirable project, and Mr. Brown added that no action had been taken by Council on this. Mr. Jones went on to say that he felt the general feeling of the Council was that they would like to support this; however, priorities must be looked at before an amount of this size is c ommitted. Mr. Jones said that there are many questions to be answered, and that Council did not give carte blanche approval. The community may have to make a decision on this. Methods of financing a project such as this were discussed. 5 Mr. Parker asked how much of the gross amount raised would be paid to the professional fund raisers, and was told that their • fee was a flat $850 per month. Mrs. Romans said that Dave Batchelor would be heading the fund-raisers, and that they are very conscientious local people. Council has been asked to underwrite the $850 per month in the event the campaign failed. Mr. Jones said that Council had given $1,500 as seed money to the Committee several months ago. Mr. Martin pointed out that the Commission can still recommend a Community Center in the Parks and Recreation Department Capital Improvements Program request. He wanted to know if a rec9mmenda- tion is requested from the Commission at this time, and Mrs. Romans answered that a recommendation is not necessary, but that the Com- mittee wanted the Planning and Zoning Commission to be aware of the project. Mr. Martin then turned the discussion to the Capital Improvements Program, complimenting the Planning and Zoning staff on the way the report was handled this year, saying that he felt it was better organized than ever before. Preferences of priorities had been marked on special forms by Commission members. Now, he said, it would be appropriate to look at the whole picture. Mr. Martin mentioned the River Redevelopment as being first on his own list of priorities, and Bill James, Director of Finance, reported on the timetable expected in this project. Mr. Smith felt it was important to ascertain items which are man-' datory, and pick up the more controversial items later, citing as an example the City Survey and land acquisition. There was discussion as to how the .priority lists should be made, and it was determined that priorities for 1976 should be set up first. Mr. James stated that there may be items listed in the Capital Improvements Program improperly, such as items for which commit- ment has already been made. More discussion followed as to how priorities should be deter- mined. Mr. Smith said he believed public health and safety should come first; service second; and beautification third. Mrs. Romans said that the top priorities should be listed by year; the others will be in priority by department. After considerable discussion priorities were set to be recom- mended to the City Manager. A copy of the recommendations approved by the Commission is attached to these minutes. Speaking on behalf of the staff: Karl Nollenberger, Bill James, Steve House and herself, Mrs. Romans said it was beautiful the way that the Planning and Zoning Commission members had pitched I in and helped with the Capital Improvements Program, and their 6 • • • work was very much appreciated. The compliment was returned by the Commissioners, with Mr. Martin commenting on the way that the format had been set up by the staff. He also felt that Miss Welty deserved thanks for the good job she has done in typing the very comprehensive report. He also thanked the Commissioners for making every effort to attend the meetings, and for their dedication in getting the job done. Mrs. Romans announced that the 18th Annual Institute for Planning Officials would be held October 1-3, 1975 at Keystone Lodge, Keystone, Colorado. There being no further discussion to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 9:00 P.M. Attachment: Priority List Eden Webster Secretary Pro-Tern 7 CAPITAL IMPHOVEMl:.N r PHOJECT PRIORITIES 1976-1980 ~ -- l PLANNING and ZONING COMMISSION CITY MANAGER .. ,. PRIORITY 79 79 !Sc PRIORITY -..,-- 7"' 77 :l: ?1 ~ 7.~ ~~ ~ Rescue Unit K i ·-,__ --,__ Ci t_y Surve_y K I 3. River Redevelopment K -r 4. Land Acquisition: + J __ . ------>-- L Cit~ Hall Parking K i a. _J __ ·---ff;,j __ _jh_ Belleview Fire Station/ &: x I Senior Citizen Center/ c. Community Rec. Center &: x I I d, Bates-Logan Park Exn_ &: x I -I I ' - 5. Storm Drainage Program K x -I I 6. On Site lmp./Housing Auth. K 7. Fire Pumper Comb. K x .. I s. Library Exnansion &: x City Hall Senior Citizen 9. Snace Conversion &: x I 10, Overlav Program ({ x ' } } Paving District &: xx x x ~· Sidewalk District &: xx x x 13. Sinclair Pool Bathhouse &: I 14. Little Dry Creek Dev. &: xx x x 15. Broadway Widening: ->-- I a. Yale-Floyd/Floyd-US285 K x b. Broadwal Median Planters!{ x I 16. Dartmouth Widening: ::>ant: a ..t e a. Logan-Delaware/Zuni-/ K x FIRE CITY MANAGER PRIORI TY '" 77 7i;> 79 So PRIORITY le, 7d1 7'1 ~(. .. -l 1. Fire Training Facility x • ' . 2. Closed Circuit TV x - ; -L.IBRARY PRIORITY Bookmobile Garage rfJN ICIPAL FACILITIES RITY -----modeling ~~ Cour t & Council Chambers Re/ I othe r City Hall Remodeline: I PARKS and RECREATION PRIORITY --- I 1. Centennial Park Shore Dev. I 2. Emerson Mini Park I 3. Cushing Park Exp. 4. Centennial Park Exp. I s. Indoor Ice Arena Lights 6. High School Ball Field I I 1. McLellan Reservoir Dev. Mountain Park Fae. 9. Indoor Rifle Range .Kenova t: ion I 10 • Dennv Miller Bldg. & Field/ I I I E.C.8 .C. I PRIOR ITY I 1. Big Dry Creek Dev. I 2. Centennial Flower Beds I POLI CE PRIORITY I 1. Indoor Pistol Range ~ 77 79 7y ~ 76 77 7g 7q 80 176 77 7g l7q ~ I ~ ~ tx x )! :x rx rx tx tx x tx x ~ x 76 77 ~ 79 Bo 76 77 ~ l'f 8o --. CITY MANAGER PRIORITY --· CITY MANAGER PRIORITY CITY MANAGER PRIORITY CITY MANAGER PRIORITY · CITY MANAGER PRIORITY -- . _J ~{~~1 _j_jj_LlJ --· Ii: '• ,, ~ J --r---·~~ ·- 7(, 77 ~·: ;y ,. ~ \ .. ·--- . 7.-. 71 ·@I ·<,· ·,· ' l ___ . -=-1~·--=L~e~h~o_w~A_v_e_nu_e~B_r_i_d~g~e~~~~-r-X~X-+-ir-+--t---~~~~~~~~~~~~~·--f-1jjl 1 _-i -. I 2. R-0-W Acquisition ~ rx :x :x ' UBUC p PR WORKS --- IORITY ------·--·------- (cont) Little Dry Creek Imp. Santa Fe to s. Platte 71r 77 ~ ~ River --- ~. Bannock~Sherman Widenin_g__ ___ 3. Realignment Floyd/Broadway ------· ~ Floyd_!:_;xtens ion s. Little Dry Creek - a. Sherman-Clarkson b. Girard-Sherman 6. MuniciEal Refuse Coll.Syso UTILITIES --- PRIORITY ~ 77 .,8 79 G'o J! x IX x xx xx oc oc x oc x 79 7'! 80 1. Water Improvement Program x J! J! x x Metered System Alternative 2~Water Improvement Program x IX J! x x Partial Metered System Alternative 3. Austere Utilities Water x IX J! x x Improvement Program, Metered System Alternative 4. Austere Utilities Water Im-x oc ] xx provement Program, Partial Metered System Alternative • I CITY ·MANAGER ...____ PRIORITY - -- . --· CITY MANAGER PRIORITY lt-77 75 7q - ib 7 78 ly t1o >-- Ee '· . '