Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-09-21 PZC MINUTES,• CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION September 21, 1976 I. Call to Order. The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairman Tanguma at 7:05 P.M. Members present: Williams, Jones, Jorgenson, D. Smith, E. Smith, Tanguma Wanush, Ex-officio Members absent: Parker, Pierson, Wade Also present: Assistant City Attorney DeWitt; Assistant Director Romans; Associate Planner House. II. Approval of Minutes. Mr. Tanguma stated that Minutes of September 8, 1976, were to be considered for approval. Ed Smith moved: Williams seconded: The Minutes of September 8, 1976, be approved as written. AYES: Williams, Jones, D. Smith, E. Smith, Tanguma NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Jorgenson ABSENT: Wade, Parker, Pierson The motion carried. III. Jefferson Professional Building Corp. Rezoning from R-2 to R-4. Case #28-76 Mr. Tanguma stated that this matter is concerned with a rezoning petition filed by the Jefferson Professional Building Corporation requesting a change of zoning on land they own in the 3500 block on South Marion Street, the change being from R-2, Medium-Density Residential, to R-4, Residential-Professional. Ed Smith moved: Jorgenson seconded: The Public Hearing on Case #28-76 be opened. AYES: Tanguma, Williams, Jones, Jorgenson, D. Smith, Ed Smith NAYS: None ABSENT: Wade, Parker, Pierson The motion carried. Mrs. Wade entered the meeting and assumed her chair with the Commission. -2- Mr. Tanguma outlined the procedure that would be followed in conducting the Public Hearing. He asked that those persons wishing to speak come to the podium to be sworn in and to identify themselves prior to speaking. Ms. Dorothy Romans, upon being sworn in, testified that she res~ded at 3600 South Bannock \ Street, and is ttje Assistant Director of CommunitY, Development for Planning. Mrs. Romans stated that this matter concerns an application filed by the Jefferson Professional Building Corporation to rezone a parcel of land under their ownership. Mrs. Romans identified the subject site on land use maps available for the Commission and audience, and pointed out that U.S. 285 is to the south of the site; it is bounded on the east by South Marion Street and is situated south of East Hampden Avenue. Mrs. Romans pointed out that there is a strip of commercial zoning along the south side of East Hampden Avenue, which extends for approxi- mately 150 feet in depth. The subject site is south of, but not adjacent to, the B-2 zoning which borders Hampden Avenue. Mrs. Romans stated that the subject property is zoned R-2, Medium Density Residence. Mrs. Romans then discussed the uses permitted in the R-2 Medium Density District and contrasted these permitted uses with those permitted in the R-4, Residential-Professional District. Both Districts would permit single or two-family uses; however, the R-2 would permit a triplex or a four-plex if suf- ficient land area were available, and the R-4 District does not permit this residential density. The R-4 District will, however, permit uses which include a professional type office building and off-street parking lots. There is a height limitation in the R-4 Zone District of two stories or 25 ft., the same as is in the R-2 District. The R-4 District was designed as a "buffer" or transitional zone to be imposed between two unlike or in- compatible districts. The setback requirements in the R-4 Zone District conform with those requirements in the R-2 Medium Density Residence District. The application filed by the Jefferson Professional Building Corp. encompasses only that property which is under their owner- ship. Under the zoning procedures in Englewood, the zoning . is extended to the centerline of streets and alleys, and does not stop at property lines; for which reason, the area being con- sidered at this Hearing extends on the south to the City limits, to the west to the centerline of the Marion/Downing alley, and to the east, to the centerline of South Marion Street. Mrs. Romans stated that no plans for a proposed development have been sub- mitted, nor has the staff asked for any plans. The zoning must be granted on the merits of the zoning itself, and not based on an architectural presentation that may or may not materialize. If the zoning is granted, any use permitted under that zone district could be located on the site. Mr. Tanguma asked if a Planned DeveloPment would be required for R-4 Development? Mrs. Romans stated that a Planned Develop- ment is not required in the R-4 Zone District; they would be en- couraged to do so, however. •, Mr. Tanguma asked what uses were permitted to the south of U.S. 285? Ms. Romans stated that this is in Cherry Hills Village; the zoning for single-family development, but they require larger lots than Englewood, and they do permit the keeping of animals. The area to the east of the subject site is developed with -3- brick homes, and there are two residential uses immediately to the north of the subject site. The area to the west is developed with an admixture of single-family and medium-density uses. Mrs. Romans asked that the staff report be entered into the record, and asked that the record also reflect that the property was properly posted, and that Public Notice of the Hearing did appear in the Englewood Herald Sentinel. Mrs. Romans noted that the staff report does have attached to it a vicinity map, a plate of pictures of the subject site and area, and copies of letters from the staff to the applicants outlining the steps to be followed in the request. Mr. Williams asked if the R-2 classification would also permit a 25 ft. high medical complex? Mrs. Romans stated that the R-2 District would not permit the medical complex; it is a residential zone permitting single or two-family uses, or if lot area is available, a triplex or a four-plex. Dr. Wells Harvey 3951 South Hillcrest Drive -stated that he practiced at 3535 South Lafayette Street, and is an officer in the Jefferson Professional Building Corporation. The applicants have owned the subject property for a number of years, and have discussed the possible construction of a medical complex on the site, or as an alternative, an off-street parking lot. Dr. Harvey noted that Cherry Hills Village did permit construction of the Burroughs building to the east, which has compounded parking problems in the area. Dr. Harvey stated that he would like to take exception to the staff report, Page 2, f3, which states that "no evidence has been presented which demonstrates that changes have occured in the area which would warrant the change of zoning." Dr. Harvey submitted that there have been changes in the area, the first of which is the Burroughs Building construction. Secondly, to the northeast, there has been a large condominium development, which has increased demand on the medical facilities, and thus an increased demand for parking space. Dr. Harvey pointed out that while they have owned the land, there has been no interest expressed by developers or anyone else re- garding possible development of the land for R-2 residential purposes. Mr. Parker entered and took his place with the Commission. Dr. Harvey stated that it was the feeling of those persons with the Jefferson Professional Building Corp., that if they cannot use the land for parking or for the development of further medical facilities, they have no further interest in the land. He reiterated they have had the land for several years, and have -4- attempted to keep it up. He stated he feels development as a medical complex or parking lot would be putting the land to better use, and would be of benefit to the neighborhood. Don Smith stated that he understood no plans for the development had been submitted; he asked Dr. Harvey if they had some idea of the type of development? Dr. Harvey stated that their plans have not progressed to that point. Dr. Guard 3535 South Lafayette Street, also an officer in the Corporation, stated that they have spent several hundred dollars per year attempting to keep the weeds cut on the property, and that this gets more expensive every year. They did do some fill work on the site several years ago, and he understands that the property owner to the north feels the site should be filled further. He stated they need to use the land for parking or for some kind of "low-rise medical facility" or office building so the property can be used rather than left empty to collect trash. Dr. Guard stated that no definite development plans have been made. Dr. Guard discussed the improvements they have made on their other property on Lafayette, and stated they would like to make a nice looking improvement on the site on South Marion also. Mr. Tanguma asked if there were any reason the vacant lot could not have been used for parking under the R-2 zoning? Dr. Guard noted that off-street parking lots are not permitted under the R-2; it must be an R-4 District to allow the off-street parking lot. Mr. Tanguma asked that the proponents speak now, if they so wish. Mr. Willis Resley 3540 South Marion -stated he lived directly across the street from the requested rezoning. Mr. Resley stated he would like to know about the possible parking facility. He stated that there is a considerable problem with parking right now; people who work in the clinic on Lafayette are parking in front of the houses all day, and are even parking in the driveways. Mr. Resley noted that construction of a building on the site would be better than the weeds that have been there. He stated he probably wouldn't be too much opposed to construction of a low profile clinic, but his major concern is the parking problem in the area. Don Smith asked Mr. Resley if he was for or against the proposed rezoning? Mr. Resley stated that at this point, he really could not say; he has seen no plans, and they don't know what type of development there would be, nor do they know what provisions there would be for parking. He stated that until he knew more about the proposed development, he would probably have to say he is against the rezoning. Mr. Tanguma again asked for anyone in favor of the rezoning to speak. No one spoke in favor of the rezoning. Mr. Tanguma then asked for those opposed to the rezoning to speak. Mrs. Doris Preston -5- 3527 South Marion -stated that she lived immediately to the north of the subject site. She asked that her son-in-law address the Commission on her behalf. Jerry Pixler 3143 W. Chenango -stated that he is the son-in-law of Mrs. Preston, who lives next door to the subject property. Mr. Pixler stated that the lot is weeds now. It is Mrs. Preston's feeling that if the zoning would remain R-2, it would be possible to develop the property under the R-2 regula- tion~ to the benefit of the property owners in the block. Mr. Pixler stated that the residents of the area do feel the addition of a parking lot or that of a building would increase the traffic using the street, and would increase the parking problem. Mr. Pixler stated that he understood the R-4 District was designed to serve as a "buffer" zone district. He noted that if the R-4 District were to be approved, it would not be possible to construct three or four units on this site, depending on whatever the frontage is; the maximum density would be two family under the R-4 District. Mr. Pixler stated that the trend in the block seems to be toward "multiple" living units, and if the site were developed properly, there would be sufficient off-street parking for those units. Mr. Pixler noted that there were a number of children living in this neighborhood, and that traffic is a problem for these children. Mr. Pixler stated that in his opinion, the residents and property owners of the area would prefer that the area remain R-2. Mrs. Wade asked Mr. Pixler if he felt the medical complex type of development would cause more traffic than they presently have; she noted that with this type of facility, they would have to provide off-street parking. Mr. Pixler pointed out there is a medical complex on Lafayette, one at Logan and U.S. 285, and one at Clarkson and U.S. 285. Mr. Pixler pointed out the lack of adequate parking facilities at all three of these medical clinics, and questioned that they would be assured of adequate parking for this proposed development. Ms. Esther Vynckier 3550 South Marion -stated that she didn't feel anyone could "agree on it until you see what kind of building its proposed to be". Mrs. Vynckier stated that she has fought against apartment building development in the past; she noted that even a two-story building would be quite high in this location. Mr. Tanguma asked if anyone else wished to speak in opposition to the rezoning? No one indicated a desire to speak. Mr. Tanguma then asked that there be a brief rebuttal time, and that if possible, the opponents and proponents each designate one spokesman. -6- Dr. Harvey stated that as he understands the discussion, the re- zoning to R-4 wouldn't preclude residential development that is available under the present R-2. Dr. Harvey noted that the medical complex at Clarkson and U.S. 285 is five stories high, and is a "big complex", therefore, has much more traffic from employees and patients. Don Smith stated he understood the applicants to say they have no definite plans for the development, but that in all probability they would have to construct a medical complex on the site, and would not use the site for off-street parking. He asked if this assumption was true? Dr. Harvey stated that it is probably true, but they have not progressed to that point of determination. Don Williams referred to letters from the staff, particularly a letter dated March 16th, in which letter criteria to be met in a rezoning request was listed. Mr. Williams stated he did not feel that this criteria has been met on this request. He pointed out that the applicants were not being denied use of their land under the R-2 --it could be developed for that purpose. Mr. Williams added that it has not been proven that there was an error in the original zoning; and there has been no proof presented of demand for additional R-4 zoning in the area. Mr. Williams stated that he did not feel these stipulations had been met. Dr. Harvey stated that he feels conditions in the area have changed, and that this would warrant the rezoning. Mr. Tanguma stated that he would now hear from the opponents. Mr. Pixler pointed out that if the area were to be rezoned from R-2 to R-4, the possibility of constructing three or four units under one roof is eliminated. He pointed out that this is a possibility of development, and that the land could be used with- out the change of zoning. Mr. Pixler stated that he felt the changes in the area cited by Dr. Harvey had affected the medical clinic, but had not affected the home owners on South Marion Street. He stated he did not feel the Doctors Harvey and Guard have presented criteria necessary for a zoning change. Dr. Guard acknowledged that parking is a problem, but the site cannot be used for a parking lot under the R-2 Zone classification. In his opinion, this is depriving them of the use of their property, and he felt that all of the people present would have to agree that they --the doctors --have improved the land they have developed. Mr. Williams asked if they wanted to develop the site as a parking lot or with a building? Dr. Guard stated that at the present time, they want a parking lot. Mrs. Vynckier stated that the doctors have come to her and asked if she would oppose a parking lot on the site. She said she felt a parking lot would be fine, if the people who park in the lot don't cut across her property to get to the clinic. She noted that she had to call the police recently, because a doctor had parked in front of her property and blocked her drive way. -7- Ed Smith asked if the frontage of the subject site on South Marion Street was approximately 300 feet long? If so, this could allow 12 units in three or four unit buildings. Mrs. Romans stated this was correct; or it could be a cluster development under the PD process. Mrs. Romans explained that the City cannot condition zoning; they cannot grant zoning for one specific use such as a parking lot. Mrs. Vynckier asked what zone classification permitted apartment houses? Mrs. Romans stated the R-3 District permitted the apart- ment house developments. Mrs. Romans noted that the doctors were informed there were three zone classifications they might want to consider: The R-3 High Density Residence District, a business district, or the R-4 Residential-Professional District. The doctors elected to apply for the R-4 inasmuch as it would seem to be · the most compatible with the surrounding development. Discussion ensued. Williams moved: Parker seconded: The Public Hearing on Case #28-76 be closed. AYES: Ed Smith, Tanguma, Wade, Williams, Jones, Jorgenson, Parker, D. Smith NAYS: None ABSENT: Pierson The motion carried. Parker moved: Wade seconded: The matter be tabled for further consideration. Mr. Parker withdrew his motion. Mrs. Wade agreed to withdraw her second. Parker moved: Ed Smith seconded: The matter be postponed until the next regular meeting of October 5th. Don Smith suggested that possibly the Commission could adjourn to executive session to discuss this, and that it need not be postponed. Mr. Williams agreed that this matter need not be postponed, and that it could be determined this evening. The vote was called: AYES: Ed Smith, Tanguma, Wade, Jones, Jorgenson, Parker NAYS: Don Smith, Williams ABSENT: Pierson The motion carried. Chairman Tanguma declared the matter postponed until October 5th. -8- A brief recess was called. The meeting again convened with the following members present: Parker, D. Smith, Ed Smith, Tanguma, Wade, Williams, Jones, Jorgenson. Absent was Mrs. Pierson . IV. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION 1977-78 Work Program CASE #29-76 Mrs. Romans reviewed projects suggested to be included in the State Highway Department's work program for fiscal year 1977-78. These projects have been submitted previously, and are requests for improvements under construction projects on the Highway System, for construction projects on the Federal Aid Urban System, and for additions to the Federal Aid Urban System. Requests for projects on the Federal Aid Urban Systems go to the Council of Governments, and projects on the Highway System go to the State Highway Commission. Mrs. Romans discussed each project. The Federal Aid Urban System designations were discussed. Mrs. Romans stated that if a street is designated on the Federal Aid Urban System, there is a possibility of getting Federal monies for construction projects. The City is asking that Floyd Avenue be constructed on the Federal Aid Urban System from Huron Street to Zuni Street. If Federal monies are available, it would be a 26/84 match, with the City's share being only 26%. Don Smith noted that the staff has indicated they are extending Floyd from Downing to Zuni on the Federal Aid Urban System. He asked for clarification on this point. Mr. Wanush stated that to be eligible for federal funds, the street must carry a federal designation, and the Federal Aid Urban System must be totally interconnected. Therefore, Floyd is requested to be designated on the Federal Aid Urban System from Downing west to Zuni, but the request for construction is from Huron west to Zuni. Mr. Williams stated that projects on the Highway System are funded by State and Federal funds; projects on the Federal Aid Urban System are funded by local funds and Federal funds. He stated that Federal Aid Urban System projects may be at intersections within a city, which intersections may not even be on a highway system. Mr. Jones stated that he understood funds were very limited for construction projects on the Urban System. Mrs. Romans discussed the widening of Broadway from Yale to Floyd. She noted that it had previously been recommended that it be widened from Yale to U.S. 285; however, City Council did not agree with that recommendation, and so the staff has now recommended the widening cease at Floyd Avenue. Mr. Jones questioned if these projects were recommended, would the City in effect be indicating approval of the Super Grid -9- system proposed as an alternative to I-470? He noted that con- struction of I-470 has been placed on the Urban System, and he felt this was the wrong placement for this request. Mrs. Romans noted that the requests which are before the Commission are not new requests, and reminded the Commission that on June 8, 1976, the Commission went on record as recommending construction of I-470, that I-470 be constructed on the airport diagonal route, and that the Super Grid be constructed in addition to I-470. In preparing the staff report, the staff included I-470 to be con- structed to express-way status. Don Smith asked if I-470 was to be constructed to an expressway status under the Super Grid? Mrs. Romans stated that the County Line Road would be constructed to a four-lane limited access facility under the Super Grid, but it would not be an expressway. Mr. Williams noted that if there is an "!" designation, this means it is an interstate; under the Super Grid system, the highway would be 11 470". Mr. Smith stated that it seemed if we indicated I-470 was to be constructed to an express-way status, we are saying we want the Super Grid system. Mr. Williams stated that he felt it was pointed out at the meeting of September 8th that the Super Grid system will do much more for the City of Englewood than any interstate construction along the 11 470" route. He stated that he felt the Commission and Council should give serious consideration to the Super Grid system. Mr. Wanush stated that a staff report is being prepared for the next Commission meeting which will be on I-470 and the alternatives. He suggested that if the inclusion of I-470 construction under the Urban Systems s ·eems to be a problem the Commission might want to delete this item. He pointed out that the Commission is already on record as supporting the construction of I-470 and the routing it should follow. Don Smith stated that he is opposed to accepting the Super Grid as the primary project; there are too many risks involved. He noted there is money in a separate fund for projects such as grade separations. There is no guarantee the funds will be available for the Super Grid. Funding of the Super Grid vs. I-470 was discussed. Mr. Wanush suggested that the recommended projects be viewed as needed projects whether or not I-470 is constructed. Mr. Jones again argued that the position of the I-470 request was in error, and should be changed. Mr. Wanush reported that the State Highway Department will hold a Public Hearing on October 20th in the Englewood City Hall Community Room on the improvement of Santa Fe Drive from Bowles Avenue to Florida Avenueo -10- Ed Smith stated that he would agree with Mr. Jones that the I-470 project request does not belong under the Urban System section. Jones moved: Ed Smith seconded: The I-470 work project request be moved into the first category: Construction Projects on the State Highway System. Don Smith asked if, by designating the I-470 project as #1 under the State Highway Work Projects, whether the City would be forfeiting any further push on Santa Fe Drive improvements. The possibility of making the I-470 recommendation a separate category was discussed. Don Smith suggested that possibly reference to I-470 could be deleted. Mr. Jones pointed out that if I-470 was not designated, it could be interpreted that Englewood doesn't want it. Don Smith stated that he understood from Mr. Brasher of the State Highway Department that I-470 would be funded under the Federal Highway Trust Fund; is this correct? In that event, I-470 is not part of the State Highway 1977-1978 Work Program. Mr. Smith stated that if I-470 is not part of the Federal Aid Urban Systems then the request should not be included under that category either. He felt that I-470 request should be removed from this report un- less it is placed under a separate category. Ed Smith pointed out that this report is the State Highway Com- mission Work Program requests; if the City wants to express a desire for the construction of I-470, it has to be included in the report somewhere. He agreed that a separate classification or heading might be the proper way to do it, and suggested adding a new major category, III, to encompass the I-470 request. Mr. Jones, with the agreement of Ed Smith as seGond, withdrew his motion. Jones moved: Parker seconded: That Page 1 of the Staff Report be amended to designate construction of I-470 as §A, and to redesignate the other categories accordingly. Further discussion ensued. It was pointed out that the reference on Page 1 is an explanation of what has happened in previous years. Mr. Jones, with the agreement of Mr. Parker as second, withdrew his motion. Jones moved: D. Smith seconded: That Page 4 of the Staff Report, Item #6, be deleted. AYES: Jones, Jorgenson, Parker, D. Smith, E. Smith, Tanguma, Wade NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Williams ABSENT: Pierson The motion carried. -11- Mr. Williams suggested that if the Commission wished to meet with the District Engineer of the Highway Department again, that Mr. Brasher would be happy to meet with them. He stated that he, personally, didn't feel the Commission had accomplished anything with the deletion of Item 6. Discussion ensued. Jones moved: Wade seconded: That the requests for the Highway Commission be amended as follows: I. Requests to the State Highway Commission for inclusion in the F.Y. 1977-78 Work Program. A. Construction Project on Federal Aid Interstate System. 1. I-470 a. To be constructed as an Interstate Highway. B. Construction Projects on the State Highway System: 1. South Santa Fe Drive and continuing on as set forth by the staff report. AYES: Wade, Jones, Jorgenson, D. Smith, E. Smith, Tanguma NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Williams, Parker ABSENT: Pierson The motion carried. The widening of South Broadway and construction of median planters from Yale to Floyd was discussed. Mrs. Wade asked if the projects along Santa Fe Drive should be prioritized? She stated that she felt the grade separation at Belleview and the railroad tracks is desperately needed. Following discussion of the matter, it was determined that there be no priority established, but that it be emphasized these are projects that need to be done. The extension of Quincy Avenue and Floyd Avenue was discussed at length. Mr. Jones discussed attitudes of the Council of Governments participants on the extension of some of the streets, and noted that one of the members from Sheridan is most anxious to have Quincy Avenue extended. Ed Smith moved: Jorgenson seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council the following 1977-1978 State Highway Department Work Program, as amended. -12- I. Requests to the State Highway Commission for inclusion in the F. Y. 1977-78 Work Program. A. Construction Project on Federal Aid Interstate System. 1. I-470 a. To be constructed as an Interstate Highway. B. Construction Projects on the State Highway System: 1. South Santa Fe Drive: a. Widen and improve to a six-lane major arterial, continuing the construction project which is now under way in Denver south to County Line Road. b. Construct an interchange at the intersection of West Dartmouth Avenue and South Santa Fe Drive. c. Construct a grade separation at the intersection of West Floyd Avenue and South Santa Fe Drive. d. Improve upon the interchange at South Santa Fe Drive and U.S. 285. e. Construct a grade separation at the intersection of West Oxford Avenue and South Santa Fe Drive. f. Construct an interchange at the intersection of South Santa Fe Drive and West Quincy Avenue. g. Construct a grade separation at the intersection of South Santa Fe Drive and West Tufts/West Union Avenue. h. Construct a grade separation at the intersection of West Belleview Avenue with the railways. i. Construct an interchange at the intersectio~ of South Santa Fe Drive and West Belleview Avenue. 2. U.S. 285: a. Construct an interchange at the intersection of South University Boulevard and U.S. 285. 3. Belleview Avenue: a. Construct Belleview Avenue to four lanes from South Peoria Street to South Sheridan Boulevard. b. Construct an interchange at the intersection of West Belleview Avenue and South Broadway. -13- c. Install storm inlets on the north side of West Belleview Avenue from South Elati Street to Big Dry Creek. II. Requests relative to the Federal Aid Urban System. A. Additions to the Federal Aid Urban System. 1. South Clarkson Street from East Yale Avenue to U.S. 285. 2. West Floyd Avenue f rom South Downing Street to South Zuni Street. B. Construction P r ojects on the Federal Aid Urban System: 1. South Broadway from Yale Avenue to Floyd Avenue. To be widened to the same width as South Broadway from U.S. 285 to Quincy, providing left-turn pockets and landscaped media n . 2. South Clarkson Street : To be constructed to two lanes from U.S. 28 5 to East Or chard Avenue. 3. South Windermere S treet : To be constructed to two lanes f rom West Oxfo rd Avenue to Gates Parkway. 4. West F l oyd Ave n ue t o be const r ucted to two lanes f rom Sou th Huron S t reet to South Zuni Street. 5, Quincy Avenue: To b e constructed to four lanes from I-225 to Sou th Simms St r eet. AYES: Tanguma, Wade, Jones, Jorg enson, Parker, D. Smith, Ed Smith NAYS : None ABSTAIN: Williams ABSENT: Pierson The motion carried. Don Smith asked that the staff n ote on the transmittal that no priority has been assigned to these requests. V. Director's Choice. Mr. Wanush stated that he wanted to discuss with the Commission the direction they feel they should be going, and the kind of projects they have in mind to reach these goals. He stated that he has asked the Division Directors to prepare a work project list for 1977, to enable the Department to budget staff time. Mr. Wanush stated that he would like, over the next several meetings, to set up regular discussions on what the Commission feels are problems in the community. He stated that he did feel the Com- prehensive Plan should be reviewed thoroughly. Mr. Wanush stated that he wanted to spend a great deal of his time on the downtown area --becoming acquainted with businessmen and property owners. -14- Don Smith noted that there is a committee of three councilmen appointed to work with the downtown property owners and business- men on development plans. This committee has not been very active to this date; he stated that he would like to do something with this group --of which he is a member --and would be willing to spend time to devote to this project. Mr. Jones noted that while he was a member of the group, they had briefly discussed special taxing qistricts and financing methods. He noted that financing of off-street parking lots is one topic for discussion. Mr. Wanush discussed the housing information available to the Department. He noted that at the present time, the staff member is also the Executive Director of the Housing Authority, which he personally feels are two different roles. He noted that housing problems extend beyond the low and moderate income levels, and he would like to review housing stock, housing condition, etc. Don Smith stated that the rental situation has been discussed at the City Council. There is a lack of desire to maintain the rental units properly. Mr. Wanush stated that I-470 and Super Grid will be on the agenda for the next meeting. Mr. Wanush stated that the matter of amending the Flood Plain Ordinance is coming up. The Flood Plain Ordinance now covers the entire city, and there is a need to more specifically define flood hazard areas. Mr. Wanush stated that he has contacted persons handling flood control insurance, and he is trying to get in touch with the staff at the Urban Drainage and Flood Con- trol District. Discussion ensued. VI. Commission's Choice. Mr. Parker stated that he had spoken to some of the property owners on South Marion Street following the conclusion of the Public Hearing. He asked if there is a method whereby the applicants submit a request for rezoning with covenants restricting the use of the land to one specific use so the property owners would know what was proposed. The residents of the area seem to favor a parking lot on the site. Don Smith stated that he didn't think covenants would be a con- cern of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. DeWitt stated that he could see some problems with covenants. It would appear to be binding on a third party, and he would question whether the Commission had the authority to require or enter into covenants; he questioned if the Statutes allowed covenants, and questioned who would enforce the covenants. He stated he would have to look into this aspect. I i " -15- Mr. Parker stated that he wasn't thinking about the Commission being involved. Don Smith stated that he felt drainage problems would be increased if the site were paved for a parking lot. Discussion ensued. Mr. Tanguma asked if all members had read the letter from Mr. Jack Carver Patterson in reference to Halcyon Heights II. Mr. Tanguma asked the Commission what action they wished to take? Don Smith moved: Jones seconded: The staff prepare an answering letter for Mr. Tanguma's signature, setting forth the facts of the Halcyon Heights II developmento AYES: D. Smith, Ed Smith, Tanguma, Wade, Jones, Jorgenson, Parker NAYS: Williams ABSENT: Pierson The motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 10:10 P.M. l Gertrude G. (W. lty Recording Secretary / ... , . . / ..-/,.I . /--;?;"'° -/ ,/' / MEMORANDU M TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNC IL REGARDING ACTION OF RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. DATE: September 21, 1976 S UBJECT: 1977-1978 State Highway Department Work Program REC OMMENDATION: Ed Smith mo ved: J o rge nso n seco nded: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council the following 1977-1978 State Highway Department Work Program, as amended. I. Requests to the State Highway Commission for inclusion in the F. Y. 1977-78 Work Program. A. Construction Project on Federal Aid Interstate System. 1. I-470 a. To be constructed as an Interstate Highway. B. Construction Projects on the State Highway System: 1. South Santa Fe Drive : a. Widen and improve to a six-lane major arterial, continuing the construction project which is now under way in Denver south to County Line Road. b. Construct an interchange at the intersection of West Dartmouth Avenue and South Santa Fe Drive. c. Construct a grade separation at the intersection of West Floyd Avenue and South Santa Fe Drive. d. Improve upon the interchange at South Santa Fe Drive and U.S. 285. e. Construct a grade separation at the intersection of West Oxford Avenue and South Santa Fe Drive. f. Construct an interchange at the intersection of South Santa Fe Drive and West Quincy Avenue. g. Construct a grade separation at the intersection of South Santa Fe Drive and West Tufts/West Union Avenue. h. Construct a grade separation at the intersection of West Belleview Avenue with the railways. i. Construct an interchange at the intersection of South Santa Fe Drive and West Belleview Avenue. 2. U.S. 285: a. Construct an interchang e at the intersection of South University Boulevard and U.S. 285. 3. Belleview Avenue: a. Construct Belleview Avenue to four lanes from South Peoria Street to South Sheridan Boulevard. b. Construct an interchange at the intersection of West Belleview Avenue and South Broadway. c. Install storm inlets on the north side of West Belleview Avenue from South Elati Street to Big Dry Creek. II. Requests relative to the Federal Aid Urban System. A. Additions to the Federal Aid Urban System. lo South Clarkson Street from East Yale Avenue to UoS. 285. 2. West Floyd Avenue from South Downing Street to South Zuni Street. B. Construction Projects on the Federal Aid Urban System: l o South Broadway from Yale Avenue to Floyd Avenue. To be widened to the same width as South Broadway from U.S. 285 t o Quincy, providing left-turn pockets and landscaped median. 2. South Clarkson Street : To be constructed to two lanes from U.S. 285 to East Orchard Avenue. 3. South Windermere Street: To be constructed to two lanes from West Oxford Avenue to Gates Parkway. 4. West Floyd Avenue to be constructed to two lanes from South Huron Street to South Zuni Street. 5. Quincy Avenue: To be constructed to four lanes from I-225 to South Simms Street. AYES: Tanguma , Wade, Jones, Jorgenson, Parker, D. Smith, Ed Smith NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Williams ABSENT: Pierson The motion carried. No priority has been assigned to these requests. By Order o f the City Planning and Zoning Commission . / _,..---. ~-:A. ~-· ---. ,..i / / /./--. v.· / _...)._,,,,.-/ 1 ~-6y,,.;r-c::. i: / n > --· / f 'ertrude G: Welty · J ./ Recording ~cr et ary /