HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-03-19 PZC MINUTES•
•
•
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
March 19, 1985
I. CALL TO ORDER.
The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called
to order by Chairman Venard at 7:00 P. M.
Members present: Magnuson, McBrayer, Stoel, Venard, Carson
Members absent: Allen, Barbre, Beier
Also present: D. A. Romans, Assistant Director of Community Development
Susan T. King, Senior Planner
Harold J, Stitt, Planner II
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
March 5, 1985
Chairman Venard stated that the Minutes of March 5, 1985 were to be
considered for approval.
Magnuson moved:
Stoel seconded: The Minutes of March 5, 1985 be approved as written .
AYES: Stoel, Venard, Magnuson
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: McBrayer, Carson
ABSENT: Allen, Barbre, Beier
Chairman Venard ruled that the Minutes stand approved.
III. PLUMMER REZONING REQUEST
R-2, Medium Density Residence
to B-2, Business
Carson moved:
CASE #5-85
Stoel seconded: The Public Hearing on Case #5-85 be opened.
AYES: Stoel, Venard, Carson, Magnuson, McBrayer
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Allen, Barbre, Beier
The motion carried.
Mr. Venard stated that he does have in hand a copy of the public notice
published in the official City newspaper, and the Certification of Posting
submitted by the applicant. He asked that these items be made part of the
record of this Hearing .
Mr. Venard stated that a sign-in sheet has been circulated through the
audience for people to sign who wish to address the Commission on the
matter of the rezoning request. Mr. Venard stated that he would be
calling on those people to come forward, state their name, and be sworn
in; testimony should be directed to the Commission regarding the issue
of the rezoning.
-2-
Mr. Venard asked if the applicant was present. Mr. Frank Cristiano
stated that he is representing Mr. Plummer, who is present, and that
he, Mr. Cristiano, will be making the presentation to the Commission.
Mr. Cristiano stated that Mr. Plummer is the owner of property at 3511
South Downing Street, and also owns Fratelli's Restaurant at the south-
east corner of South Downing Street and East Hampden Avenue. The
restaurant was established 10 to 15 years ago, and has been very suc-
cessful; the facility seats between 75 to 80 people at the present time,
and Mr. Plummer wants to expand the restaurant to accommodate approxi-
mately 150 in seating capacity. Mr. Plummer must provide off-street
parking for the increased restaurant area, which he cannot do on the
subject restaurant site. Mr. Plummer has tried to negotiate with an
adjoining property owner for use of land for parking, but this has not
been successful. Mr. Plummer has purchased property across South
Downing Street to the west of the restaurant, 3511 South Downing Street;
this is the second property south from Hampden Avenue. Mr. Plummer
proposes to demolish the existing structure, which is substandard, and
improve this site for a parking lot. However, to develop a parking lot
on this site, Mr. Plummer needs to have the zoning changed from R-2,
Medium Density Residence to B-2, Business. Mr. Cristiano pointed out
that the site of the proposed parking lot is contiguous to the existing
B-2 Zone District which runs along East Hampden Avenue. Mr. Plummer
does have a demand for additional parking, and if the additional parking
lot cannot be developed, he will not be able to expand the restaurant,
which may in turn lead to his having to relocate to a larger site al-
together. Mr. Cristiano stated that they propose to comply with the
provisions of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; they will comply
with the landscaping requirements and fencing adjacent to the residential
development. Mr. Cristiano stated that he is of the opinion that the
restaurant and proposed parking lot are in compliance with the intent
of the Comprehensive Plan, that this development fits in with the mixed
use development along the Hampden corridor, and contributes to the busi-
ness health and tax base of the community. Mr. Cristiano stated that
Mr. Plummer submitted with the application, copies of statements from
the land owners and neighbors in the area in support of Mr. Plummer's
requested rezoning. He stated that Mr. Plummer received an excellent
response, and received no objections to the proposed rezoning. There
are also five people in attendance at this meeting who are willing to
speak in support of the rezoning request. Mr. Cristiano summarized
his presentation, stating that Fratelli's is an established restaurant
which is revitalizing the area, the applicant will be taking a "problem"
property and will develop it as a parking lot for this vital, productive
business, and it will be a positive step for the community. Mr.
Cristiano addressed a concern that had been expressed by City staff
members regarding people crossing South Downing Street from the parking
lot; he noted that people park up and down both sides of South Downing
Street and cross the street to reach the restaurant now. People are
also crossing Hampden Avenue, which carries much heavier traffic volume
than South Downing. He noted that there is a signal at the intersection
of South Downing Street/East Hampden Avenue, and that people could cross
with the signal.
Mr. Carson stated that he had spoken with Mr. Plummer, and that Mr.
Plunnner indicated to him that signs would be installed at the restaurant
and at the parking lot directing patrons to cross the street at the in-
tersection with the light.
•
••
•
•
-3-
Mr. McBrayer asked about the ground cover material and size of trees to
be used on the landscaping plan. Mr. Plummer stated that the architect
suggested Honey Locust trees; he does not know what size, and no decision
has been made whether ground cover will be grass or whether it will be a
rock and bark-chip cover. Mr. Plummer stated that he will be removing
the existing trees on the site, and will install one tree, but reiterated
that he does not know the size, or even the type of tree for sure. Mr.
Plummer was not sure, either, whether he will have a sprinkler system
installed. Mr. Plummer stated that the parking lot will be lighted.
Mr. McBrayer asked if the Commission approved this plan as submitted,
the applicant would have to plant a Honey Locust tree; is this correct.
Mrs. Romans pointed out that the issue before the Commission is the
change of zone classification from R-2, Medium Density Residence, to
B-2, Business, and that the parking plan is not the subject of the
Hearing. Mr. Plummer has not presented a specific plan for the parking
lot or landscaping thereof.
Mr. Venard asked if the parking lot would be of sufficient size that it
will have to be considered by the Commission at a later date. Mrs. Romans
stated that it will not .be; the applicant will have to comply with the
landscaping provisions for parking lots at such time as the actual de-
velopment of the lot occurs, but that this would be enforced by staff.
Mr. Venard asked if the staff had anything they wished to add to the
staff report, or comments they wished to make on the issue. Mrs. Romans
stated the staff had nothing further to add, but will answer questions
if the Commission has questions.
Mr. Venard called on Mr. Nelson to address the Commission.
Mr. Richard Nelson
6017 South Locust Street -was sworn in, and testified that he is in
favor of the rezoning request. Mr. Nelson
stated that he is a teacher in the Cherry Creek School system, and is
also a part-time clerk at Old Town Liquors at 1215 East Hampden Avenue.
Patrons going to Mr. Plunnner's restaurant park in the parking lot of
the liquor store and cross Hampden Avenue to the restaurant. The parking
lot provided by Old Town Liquors is for the patrons of that business,
not for Fratelli's Restaurant. Mr. Nelson pointed out that the traffic
traveling west on Hampden Avenue is traveling at a pretty good speed,
and it is dangerous for persons crossing the street to get to the
restaurant. Mr. Nelson urged approval of the rezoning request.
Mr. Venard called on Mr. Hooper. Mr. Hooper declined to address the
Commission, stating that he is a customer of Fratelli's, but did not
come prepared to speak.
Mr. Venard asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak to the
Commission.
Mr. Jess Crane
3502 South Marion Street -was sworn in, and testified that he is a
property owner in the area, owning a four-
bay garage on East Hampden Avenue, and the property at 3502 South Marion
Street. Mr. Crane supported the development of a parking lot for the
restaurant, noting that people cannot park on the street because it is
-4-
already crowded with customers going to the restaurant. Other people
who provide off-street parking deserve to have that parking used by
their patrons, not used by the customers of the restaurant. Mr. Crane
stated that the Commission would be doing the people of the neighborhood
a service by granting the rezoning to Mr. Plummer to allow the develop-
ment of the off-street parking lot.
Mr. Stoel asked about the residents who live in the area; what about
the resident who has a parking lot developed right next to them. Mr.
Crane stated that he could not speak for a resident who might be right
next door to a parking lot, but pointed out that if the residents ob-
jected to the proposal, he felt they should be present at this meeting
to voice their objections.
Mr. Cristiano pointed out that no objections were voiced when Mr. Plunnner
took the letters around to the residents. Mr. Stoel pointed out that he
would discount the majority of those letters submitted by Mr. Plummer,
because they are signed by "tenants", not property owners and he would
not place much validity in the tenants' signatures. Mr. Plummer pointed
out that he went to both renters and property owners in seeking the
letters of approval. Mr. Stoel stated that a lot of emphasis is being
placed on the submission of the letters, which don't mean a lot to him
because the renters may be there one day and gone the next day. He
stated that the restaurant is an asset to the City, but the Commission
must consider the ramifications of rezoning; if the rezoning is approved,
there is no guarantee that the property owner will, in fact, build a
parking lot on this site.
Mr. Raymond Kavolt
1235 East Hampden -was sworn in, and stated that he is the manager of
Gilmore Cleaners at the East Hampden Avenue address.
He stated that they experience problems with people parking in their
parking area and crossing the street to the restaurant. He stated that
concern has been expressed about patrons of the restaurant crossing
South Downing Street, but pointed out that they presently cross East
Hampden Avenue; it should be much better to have a parking lot for the
restaurant across the street on South Downing. In response to a question
Mr. Kavolt stated that he did not feel the restaurant clientele will
walk to the light at the intersection, but will cross the street directly
from the parking lot; he pointed out, however, that South Downing Street
does not carry the traffic that East Hampden Avenue carries. The de-
velopment of the parking lot on South Downing Street will alleviate
the congestion experienced by the businesses across Hampden Avenue to
the north, and noted that he, for one, did not open a business on East
Hampden Avenue to provide parking for Mr. Plummer's customers at
Fratelli's.
Mr. Venard asked if there was anyone else in the audience who wished
to address the Commission. No other member of the audience addressed
the Commiss i on. Mr. Venard then asked if any member of the Commission
had any questions.
Mr. Stoel stated that on the east side of the street in the 3500 block
of South DowninR, there is a business; he asked if the staff knew what
this business is. Mrs. Romans stated that there is a home occupation
in that block, which she assumed Mr. Stoel was referring to, and that
•
•
•
-5-
she will ask the Code Enforcement Officer to check it out. Mrs. Romans
pointed out that the staff has had inquires about commercial zoning fur-
ther south on South Downing Street, but there has not been a follow-up
on these inquiries.
Mr. Stoel stated that there is a mixed zoning on South Marion Street.
Mrs. Romans referred to the official zoning map, pointing out the B-2
strip zoning, and the R-2 zoning for the remaining depth of the block.
Discussion ensued.
Carson moved:
McBrayer seconded: The Public Hearing on Case #5-85 be closed.
AYES: Venard, Carson, Magnuson, McBrayer, Stoel
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Allen, Barbre, Beier
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried.
Mr. Venard asked the pleasure of the Commission.
McBrayer moved:
Carson seconded: The Planning Commission refer the rezoning request
filed by Mr. James Plummer for 3511 South Downing
Street to City Council with a favorable recommenda-
tion.
AYES: Carson, McBrayer, Stoel, Venard
NAYS: Magnuson
ABSENT: Allen, Barbre, Beier
ABSTAIN: None
The motion carried.
Mr. Venard thanked members of the audience for their attendance and
participation in the Public Hearing.
Mr~ Plummer was informed that the recommendation of the Planning Com-
mission will be submitted to the City Council, and another Public Hearing
will be held by the Council at a date to be determined.
IV. RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION
South Pecos Street
West Warren Avenue
CASE #6-85
Mr. Venard asked if the applicant for the right-of-way vacation was
present.
Mrs. Romans stated that she had talked to Mr. Dodson earlier in the
week, and he had stated at that time that he would be attending the
Commission meeting. Mrs. Romans stated that Mr. Dodson has worked verv
closely with the City staff. and has been trying to ~et the vacation
request before the Commission and council for a number of years. She
requested permission for the staff to proceed and make the presentation
on behalf of Mr. Dodson in his absence.
Mr. McBrayer expressed concern that the Commission should proceed with-
-6-
out the presence of the applicant.
Mr. Stoel asked why it has taken so long to get the vacation before
the Commission. Mrs. Romans stated that the centerline of the right-
of-way for South Pecos Street and West Warren Avenue is the boundary
between the City and County of Denver and Arapahoe County. The position
has been taken that inasmuch as one-half of the right-of-way is in an-
other governmental jurisdiction, the right-of-way should be vacated by
both entities at the same time, if possible. Mrs. Romans stated that
the Englewood staff has met with representatives of Denver; in Denver
it is the policy that a "fee" must be paid to get something before the
City Council. The ownership of the property has changed several times
since the initial request for vacation of the right-of-way was made,
and until this time a property owner has not followed through on the
request. Mrs. Romans pointed out that the right-of-way being considered
in this case all came from this subject property, and does not serve any
public purpose. Mrs. Romans stated that Denver has now vacated the
right-of-way on South Pecos Street. Mr. Dodson has paid the fee to
Denver on behalf of the property owners to the north of West Warren
Avenue, and the application has been filed in Denver. Mrs. Romans
stated that Mr. Dodson has been given permission to put a fence across
the street to try to keep people from dumping trash on the site; this
has been a big problem on this property for a number of years. She
stated that the right-of-way cannot be utilized, so it serves no public
purpose, and in her opinion, should be vacated.
Mr. McBrayer stated that he appreciates the time and effort the staff
has put into this request, but he does feel the applicant was advised
of the date and time of the meeting at which his request would be con-
sidered, and that he felt the staff should not be responsible for making
the presentation for the applicant. Mr. McBrayer stated that he felt
the Commission should hear both sides of the issue.
Carson moved:
Magnuson seconded: The vacation of right-of-way for South Pecos Street
and West Warren Avenue be tabled until the next
meeting.
Mrs. Romans stated that she would notify Mr. Dodson of the Commission's
action, and notify him of the date and time of the next meeting.
The vote was called:
AYES: Carson, Magnuson, McBrayer, Stoel, Venard
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Barbre, Beier, Allen
The motion carried.
V. PUBLIC FORUM.
There was no one in the audience who wished to address the Commission
at this time.
•
•
•
•
-7-
VI. DIRECTOR'S CHOICE.
Mrs. Romans introduced Kamal Jamad, a student at UCD who is observing
the meeting as a class project.
Mr. Jamad requested clarification of "vacation of right-of-way'', Mr.
Venard and Mrs. Romans addressed this issue in further detail.
Mrs. Romans stated that reservations have been made for Mr. and Mrs.
Carson's attendance at the DRCOG Annual Banquet to be held on March 27
at the Westin Hotel. Mrs. Romans a ·sked if there were other members
who wished to attend this banquet. No one else indicated they wanted
to attend.
Mrs. Romans stated that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance amendments
have all been referred to City Council; it is anticipated that the
Public Hearing will be scheduled for April 22nd. The Ordinance is to
be published in full in the Sentinel on March 20th.
VII. COMMISSIONER'S CHOICE.
Mr. Carson presented some pictures from Clearwater, Florida on a trash
pick-up procedure; this is a one-man operation, and takes 10 seconds
per house. Mr. Venard suggested that these photographs should be sub-
mitted to Mr. Allen. Mr. Venard also pointed out that further considera-
tion of the goals of the Commission will also be taken up at a later
meeting.
Discussion ensued on Case #5-85, and the letters that were submitted by
Mr. Plummer. Mr. Stoel reiterated previous statements that the majority
of the letters were signed by "tenants", not "owners". Mr. Magnuson
stated that he voted "no" on this matter because he is concerned about
the continual encroachment of business zoning into the residential areas.
Mr. Bill Speck, a student observer from UCD, asked what the procedure
would be at the City Council level on the rezoning. Mr. Venard stated
that City Council will have to set a public hearing on the rezoning,
also, and will make their decision based on the facts presented at that
hearing, in addition to consideration of the documentation presented
from the Planning Commission and staff, Mr. Speck asked if the recom-
mendations of the Commission are usually made based on whether there is
objection from the neighbors. Mr. Venard stated that this may be a
part of the consideration of the Commission.
The meeting adjourned at 8:00 P. M.
G :r trude G. Wel 1:J:'
Recording Secre.t'.~ry