HomeMy WebLinkAbout1958-02-19 EWAB MINUTESPNGLEWOCD WATFR ADVIS<RY BOARD ~EErING ... FEBRUARY 199 1958
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Frantz at 8:00 Po M.,
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Other Officials
Present:
Brownewell, Frantz, Kreil1ng1 McCabeJ PurcellJ Robohm, Scott
None
City Manaeer Rudd, Special Counsel Soivers, Utilities Commissioner
Babcock
Mayor Carroll Co Elkins along with Councilmen Alfred Rents a.rd Maurice Eo Nesbl tt of the
Town of Sheridan, appeared to renew discussion relative to the possibili1¥ of securing
&lglswood sewage treatment for the Town of Sheridano
The main points of discussion were as follows:
lo There are approximately 700 potential sewer taps 1n the Town of · Sheridan, including
82 taps which have already been issued to Sheridan Sanitation District (Carey•s
Subdivision)o The City is already obligated to serve 83 additional taps to
Sheridan Sanitation District by Connectorvs Agreemento
2o In preliminary studies pre?&red, there are three alternatives for construction of
a sewer system for the Town of Sheridano
3o A discussion of the various elevations within the Town of Sheridan arrl the problems
involved tn devising a method of deli.raring sewage to the Englewood sewer plant()
4o The need for advice, from the Citu of Englewood, as to it's ability to serve the
Town of Smridan an:i the basis of cost for connection to the system as well as
treatment charges an:i the possibls expedience with which such advice might be made
availableo
Mayor El.kins stated, that in order to assist the Citu of Englewood in it's study of the
situation, he would direct Mro Dale Rea, Consulting Engineer for the Town of Sheridan, to
furnish a copy of the prelir.dr1ary report on the proposed Town of Sheridan sewer sys temo
Mro Babcock, Utilities Canmissiomr, presented and led a discussion on a report prepared by
him on the anticipated demand Inside and Outside the City, compared with present available
water supplyo (See copy of the report attached as a part of these minuteso)
The main point of discussion, as a result of the report., was the necessity for and the pos-
sibility of securing raw water storage facilities o
Mro Shivers, Special Counsel, was asked to determine, as soon as possible, the costs involved
in a study for the location for storage reservoir§ also, to investigate and check the probable
values of the water rights being ottered to the Cit¥ from time to timeo
Mro Rudd, City Manager am Mro Babcock, Utilities Commissioner, discussed the following
offers to sell or lease to the City of Englewood, certain water rights:
lo An offer by Wo Ho Chapman, Agent, City o! Central Cit,-1 Colcrado, to sell the
J.ames Peak Reservoir and water rights for total price of $25 1 000 casho
No action taken by the Boardo
2 o An offer by Ro Jo Tucker Ji 3330 Soo Zuni Street, to sell 162 inches of Bell and
Olson, Bear Creek water rights, Noo .5 or Noo 6 priority, at $100000 per incho
No action taken by the Boordo
••••
-2 -
3o An offer by Colorado Central PCMer Company to lease to the City 2 wells on their
property Srutlnrest of Littleton, above the City Ditcho
Due to the difticul ty of transmissl. on of this water to the City 1 the Board
felt that it was unwise to take any action at this time.a
4o The City Manager reported information that the Fort L:>gan Reservation is about
to be disposed of as surplus G::>vernment property, and that the water wells and
whatever rights may accrue to same together wit'b the sewage disposal plant on
the Reservation might be available for purchase by som local Governmental
Subdivisiono
The City l~ana.eer was asked to contact the Regional Commissioner of a. s. A.
arxl to procure additional intormationo
llro Rllid, City Manager, repcrted that Cit,' Council had received an offer to sell1 to the
City of Englewood,. certain lams located just north of the present &lglewood Sewage Disposal
Plant site, far possible expansion or the present plant, said offer having been referred to
the Water Advisory Board for cansiderationo
It was brought out, in discussion, that the extent of plant expansion depends almost entirely
upon the potential· service areao
At present, consideration is being given to the possibility ar sewage treatment service for
the TOlfn of Littleton and the Town of Sleridan along with consideratlon for the potential of
the South Arapahoe Sanitation District southeast or the City, am it was determined that no
immediate action should be taken on the purchase of additional land rar plant expansion until
such time as this total potential can be analyzed0
Mr. Ru1d, City Manager, reported that on January 14, l95B, he had communicated, by letter,
with Mro Ro Yo Batterton., Manager, Departnent of Public Wcrks, City and Coun'GY of Denver,
relative to the possibility of securing sewer treatment service from the City or Denver tor
properties located adjacent to existing Denver collection lines within a part of Us Scenic
View area, now in the City of Englewoodo
The following arumer, from Uro Batterton, was then presented and read by Vro Rucki:
Mr o L. Ro Rudd
City llanager
CITY AMD COUNTY OF DENVFR
Depart.usnt; or Public
Works
January 31, 19.58
3345 South Bannock Street
Englewood, Colorado
Dear Mro Rudd:
Office of Manager
City and County Bldgo
Denver 2, Colorado
This is to acknowledge your lBtter of January 1.4, •hich I have delayed answering,
pending receipt or some specific information .f'rom our engineers~ In the interests
o£ cooperating w:L th our neighbors, I had hoped that some special circumstances
existed which would enable us to grant your request, however,. regret that it is not
possible tor me to do SOo
Our possibilities as applied to sewage service ootside the City Lim.its are effect!ve ~
l.Y limited by the capacity of our collection system and other problems involving our
treatment planto Our overall situation is critical to the point that for mere than
-3 -
two years past we have consistently, and "fii thout exception, refused all requests for
connections from users located outside the City am County of Denvero Applicants
have ranged from individuals to schools and other institutionso
Should we vary our policy in any single instance• we would pl.ace ourselves 1n a
position to be accused of discrimination, and would be subjected to a considerable
number of suits" In enforcing tha. t policy 1 we have successfully concluded court
actions enjoining persons from connecting with the Denver system, and forcing dis-
connection from persons from persons who have made unauthorized connectionso
Unless a plan is success£ulJ..y developed far collection arrl treatment:. of sewage on an
area basis, which I hope will becor.e a realitor 1 an:i have done ever-.(thing within ?lzy"
power to bring about that objective, service cannot be given by Denver to the area t c
which you refer in the foreseeable future 9
RYB;pfa
---
Sincere~,
/s/ Ro Y9 Batterton
Mam.gar
J&ro Rudd, City Manager, next presented and read a letter from the Valley Sanitation District
authorizing the City of Englewood to use that District's sewer outfall l:!ne, on a temporar;y
basis, for sewer service for Scenic View, until the line is filled to capacito" by the Valley
Sanitation Distr1ct0 The letter suggested documentation by the City Attorneyo
The Board indicated appreciation of the offer, but took no spe<-ific actiono
---
Mayor Scott reported to the Water Advisory Board on the following natters:
lo Mayor Scott and Mro Purcell will meet, as soon as possible, with Mr 9 Voight of
General Iron Works to discuss connection of General Iron Works to the Englewood
water systemo
2o That those cor.mnmities who were active in opposing tho Blne River-South Platte
Water Conservancy District arxl were in arrears in paynent of their share of
litigati~ costs are now current with the exception or Littletona
3o That Mr~ o•Brien, small water rights owner, who has been doiJlt some maintenance
work on the Brown Ditch without this Board's authorization has approached Mayor
Williams of Littleton, asking for payment from other rights owners for services
renderedo
The Englewood Water Advisory Board, without formal action, asked Mayor Scott
to relay to Mayor Williams that any proposal by Mro O'Brien wOllld be given
consideration; however, the inclination of the Board was not to pay since the
City did not authorize any of the work undertaken by lira QQBrieno
4o 'nlat Mro Ivan Thomas of Centennial Race Track has expressed his desire and that
of surrounding landowners that the Brown Ditch be closed in their areaa
No action taken 9
After some discussion by all nembers of the Board• Chairman Frantz stated,. that until further
notification, the Water Advi.aory Board will neet on the First Wednesday o.r each month, at
8:00 Po Mo
Mr. Shivers, Special Counsel, stated .that a heanng. on diligence. in District Court, Grand
County, relative to the water ridits far the Cabin-U9adow Creek Diversion Project, will be
held at Hot Sulphur Springs, March 3, 1958, prior to the next regular neeting of the City
.e ·
-4 ~
Council and that he intended to appear, subject to authorization by the City o
Scott moved,
llcGabe, seconded, That the Water Advisory Board reccmmend to City Council t.bat they
ratify authority for the attendance of llro Mo Oo Shivers, Special
Counsel, as representative of the City ot Englewood, at the
Ayes:
Nayas
Absenti
hearing on diligence• in District Court, Orand County, on the water
rights for the Cabin..Ueadow Creek Diversion Projecto
Brownewell, Frantz, Kreiling, llcCabe, Purcell, Robobm, Scott
None
None
---
There being no 1'1rther business to come before the &lglewood Water Advisory Board, the
meeting waa adjourned at llt 3S P .. Mo
John Do Curtice
Lcordi!ig secretary
Approved
------~~--~~
R.EPOR .. . ...,,_
Ol~ THE ANTIVIPATED DEHAND INSIDE m OUTSIDE Tllli crrY
COMPARED Y/I'l'H PRESl!.NT A 'AIL.WLE 1 T.E..'ft SUPPLY
February 1 ~ 1958
The f ollonng ia e. list of the ater t ps pre ..,ntly being served
" with Englewood ater co bin d th those anticipated for ·:a.ter ervio
within the foreseeable future:
p sent
Number
OUTSIDE CITY of ta s
South st Che -ry Hill:s Water District 10~ I Greenwood Village
Area West ot Santa Fe, between Hampden&. Bellevie
636 (other than Town of Sheridan
Brookridge Heights (it changed over from D nver
s;ystem or annexed) 0
Southo>.Ea.st Englewood Water District
·(present boundary) 360
Denver O'Wlled land in center of Soutl'FEast
E~ewood Water District 0
Miscellaneous, em.all fringe areas 112
Total Outsi 1,210
INSIDE CITY
Present Number of taps inside City 8,010
Estimated additional taps inside City
(Including Scenic View) 0
Total Insid a,010
Total Outside and Inside the City 9,280
PRESENT ENGLE tOOD WATh.R SUPPLY
Total Available
without call
on River
SOURCE CUbic Fto r Sec
South Platte River (decreed)
South Platte River =Additional Nevada
Ditch for which point of diversion
has not been changedo
McBroa:n Ditch
City Ditch
Well Water = available for peak load use
from Colorado Central Po r Coo 11s
270082 CFS
5o0~8 CFS
20135 C.FS
o47S CFS
and wlls purchase<l fran Val.lay ~veloirient
Canpan_y ilo~JO
Brown Di t h ( Tri·..,,Ci ty Trust)
1/3 of present atIK>unt purchased =
Epperson Ditch (Tric-Oity Trust)
1/3 of present amount purchased::.
Less 1$% for Loss
NET TOTALS
40000 CFS
0720 CFS
Slo970 CFS
7o79$ CFS
44o..17S CFS
Esuima.ted Estim t .
Future tota Futu
Noo oft ;.3 Po U.ation
.350 ,400
190 760
i,soo 6,ooo
200 800
6,000 24,000
l,Soo 6,000
200 800
9,940 .39:760
8,010 .32"280
2.000 a.ooo
10,070 40!1280
20,010 80,~0
Total Available under -
Extreme Adverse Conditions
l.So-396 CFS
211263 CFS
2n000 CFS
,,400 CFS
lOoOOO CFS
2,,,300 CFS
,,6oo CFS
.32o9S9 CFS
4o9ls4 CFS
28,,0lS CFS
9(>946
1 982
1,,292
0258
60460
,.
l 486
0)88
2lo612
30272
18oS4o
Equi vat en·l; in population at p ek
otion of 4 0 gSJ. s/ ~ /ca i ilo
Equiv ent in opulation t \'dnt r 6
:v r a or 90 gal.s/ y/capit o
to f igi
,.. 'OUi:. C
on lu"· r . ··--
15 . 0
.317 000
t y contempl
00 0
0
upply of r ... d
on the amount stimated that be availahl"' <iur er in the event ot
an unusually dr;J" year or a s ccession of dry year o
Thus from the figures cwpiled above it ould q>pear that under extreme
adverse conditions we 'ould be limited to · popul t1on of 45,000 tllich is £ar
from the 80,000 estimated that the City would be r c;.uiI'ed to serve in the foresee=
able future in the areas already committed plus reaa in which it Yrould oo logic
to malm addttional. comm.itments, without enlargement of the South=.East Engle ood
Water District except the presently Denver owned lando
Tl1e present filter plant capacity of 220.5 million gallons par dczy · ould
provide for a population oi $6 .. oc: during peak mouthso I an tol by our consulting
engineer that th additional. revision and adjustments t a plan" c n. be · c s d
to 26oO MGD or for a population of 65 000 and that would be the limito
The present pumping capacity at the Platte River int ·s 17 ooo, 00
gallons per da_y which is also approximately the capacity of the t ananiosio. lin
from the pumping station to the filter planto 1'hus thi.., phase of' our sye
be creating the next bottleneck and will involve not only dition p ping
capacity but additional transmission line capacity to tlw filter planto Ho :av r
if arrangements ca.."l be made to uti.U,.,.e the City Ditch :for tr nsmissio11 of r
water, the enlargenent of tha River pumping plant will not be neces o
The a quisit.ion o;f large sour es of supply of W"t r rould bs j.mprci.cti cal
without a corresponding increase in plant capacity to PI ocess the ter and make
it availab e upon demand in o:rd.ar to real ze the revenu necessary to pey off th
increased bonded indebtednssso
Some of tm factors that ould d crease the ultimate anticipated demand
or permit more vsater to be availabl re as follo. :
lo Tho uncertainty of all the areas above listed outside t.oe City e er
be~ ann ~ d or included in a Water Diatricto
2o The improbability that all of tho area no in uded in the South.,
East Englewood Water District nould e-cror develop canpletely i:f so i'· uld
probably be several years henceo
Jo The length of periods in lich only 1861 water would be available
in the South Platte River.,
4,, Short periods of high peak demand could be pple nted fr th
raw water storage reservoirs at the plant bu.t would not be considered adviea le
· ' only as a last resort due to the depletion o! this re erv for per tionel
emergencieso
So Perogative of sprinkling regulations outside th° Cityo
60 All outside the City water will be metered,,
7 o Additional raw water storageo
A ' ,_.,
How rar the City would want to gamble on 8.1\V one or more of the above
factors materializing to enable more water to be available is something for the
"crystal ballo"
However, item Noo 7 above would not be a gambleo Additional raw
water storage is without a doubt the best solutiono The possibilities and
problems of obtaining storage are varied, complicated and expensiveo The fact
that we do not now have storage after realizing the need for several years
would bear this outo It would appear to be impossible or at least impractical
to obtain sufficient direct now water rights to insure that we would not still
be short on allotted water during the dr,y years to supply all the anticipated
future demando Frca calculations it would appear that a supplementary storage
or 3 1 000 acre .fe t would be ample for the toreaeeable .futureo For example:
3 1 000 Aao Ft I .326 1 000 Gala per Aco Fto • 976,ooo,ooo GaUfJOS
809 000 Popo ... 45',000 pcpo :.ii 3S,OOO population additional above our
minimum auppq population o
35,000 I boo • 11 0001 000 gallons per ~ to Jllllke up, in addition to allotted
2 water due to calls on the Bi.Yero
976 2 0008000 $:: • lbO days supply 7,ooosooo
BJ the same calculationa 3 1 000 Acre Feet storage would provide maJce .. up water
for 10011 000 population for 90 days which would still be ample since we are
only concerned vi th the summer months, assmning, of course, that arzy-storage
facilities can be replenished during the of'tcpeak eeasono
CONCLUSIONS .
lo Englewood has a situation in which there is a very large differential
between the nonnal dC1111estic use load and the irrigation load in the summero
Moat cities in the semi-arid regions haYe a similar situation but Englewood i8
more pronounced due to being on fiat rateso For this reason we have to be
prepared to supply this demand and our first obligations are with the citizens
of Englewoodo All distributor8 a Contracts provide that the Citq may lease ter
to outside areas •when the water suppl.1' for the City and its inhabitants is above
that necessary for ite present and .future need.so"
2o 'lb.us until adequate storage is provided or a more adequate guaranteed
allotment ot direct tlov rights during the surmner r:.ontha is foreseen, or a canbina"'!
tion of both, it would ppear 1Ultd.se to obligate the City further by taking in
additional areas other than those listed in the first tabulations of this reporto
W& are already aver...canmt.tted should these areas develop rap1<il3" and/or w b&'t'8
a series ot dry yearso
J,,, Furthermore, the Southeast Englewood Water District's water syetem
is only designed for S,000 taps which would serve the original districto Subee-
ftUentJ¥, addit.ional areas have been added which has increaaed the e timated tapa
to 6,,000o It would appear that the Southeast Englewood Water District would also
want to ana1iie their capacity to serve so u not to be committed beyond the 11m1t
of ~":ieir sys~ or beyond the limit ot the City to deliver water to the point ot
connection with the City systemo The area in the Preiiminary Agreement with the
Southeast Englewood Water District vas 2 1 270 acreoo The Distributoros Contract
covered 2 1 990 acreso With Supplementary Agreements Noso l to 5 added the area ia
now J,7SS acreso ·
bo ·No attempt is made in this repOl"t as to hov and where storage can or
should be prorided due to lack ot correlated data on the problems involvedo It
is reccanended that concentrated efforts be punmed ilmediately to determine hov
and where such storage can be obtaimd, together with the costo A smaller amount or storage to start with., with prorisions for enlargment as the demand incrraasea.
might be more practicalo .
' >
' •
S" It is also recanmended that all t.he water rights tl'lat the City
has a f'inancial. interest in on the South Platte water shed be made available
by transfer ot point ot diversion$) or otherwise, so that the tulleet utili ation
can be made t our diversion tacilit.ieso
60 It is further recanmended that the City pursue more aggressive~ t
acquisition or available dditional m:1acan•neou wt.er right.a 1n our om "baCJC
yard" o 'lbe apparent necessity of refering offers to the Tri-City Trust is now
creating a stumbling block and practic~ eliminating the City f'rca cca.petition.
Raepecttol]1' SubJnitted
~»,~'-
Harold Ho ~besock,
Utilities Ccmmissioner
"
..J ' •
Date:
Subject:
Recommendation:
MEMORANIUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COONCIL ·REGARDING ACTION
OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE ENGIBWOOD WATER ADVISffiY BOARD
Attendance of llro Ho Oo Shivers, Special Counsel, at water rights
hearing,,
That City Council ratify authority for the attendance of Mr. Yo OQ
Shivers, Special Counsel, at a hearing on diligence, in District
Court,· Grand County, rel.a tive to the water rights for the Cabin-
Meadow Creek Diversion Project, to be held at Hot Sulphur Springs,
March 3, 19580
RespectfUlly submitted9
ENGLEl~OOD WATER ADVIS<RY BOt\RD
By: Robert F • Frantz;f Chafuiilin