The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1961-12-13 EWSB MINUTESREGUIAR MEETmG RNGLE\'lOCD YaTER AND SEWER BQ\RD -DF.X:EMBER 1.31 1961 'lbe nsetinP, was called to order by Cnairman Frantz at 8140 PoMo Members Present: Members Absent: Other City Brmnewell, Frantz, Kreiling, Oliner, Robobm Braun, Pllreell Officials Present: ut111ties Director Babcock Mro Christopher Ro Brauchll, AttomGy, was present» representingMr4 Isonard Detue., onner of a 6 inch private water main which serws approximately 30 residential water taps along South Clarkson Street and M.artin Lane, in Cherry Hills Ranchoo This residential area is located outside the city limits, adjacent to the City or Englewood, east of South Clarkson Street, just. north ot West Oxford Avenue, and 'the private min 1s fed from the 12 inch Englewood main 1n South Clarkson Streeto Mro Brauchli aplained to the Board that Mr .. DeLua no longer has a personal interest in this water main; that all of the proceeds t.ran sale or t.apa on the nain were used up in the con ... struction costs or the mainJ and, th.at there are no funds available tar possible necessary maint.enallee and repairs., Mro Brauchli stated that Mro Delne would desire to convey tlU.s water main to a proper~ f orned wat.er district or mutual water company; or., as a last resort, assess each tap holder an annual f'ee, holding such funds in escraw pan:iing an emergent situation which would require their useo Mro Brauchli indicated tblt his client desiresthe feeling of the City or Englewood relative to th9 status or service to tb:Ls water main and would appreci.a te suggestions as to the proper procedure in the mattera For the benefit of the Board., and Mro Brauchli1 Mro Babcock, Utilities Dimctor, presented the following letters: "City And County Of Denver BOARD CF WATER CCMMISSIONERS 144 West Colf'ax Avenue Denver 2, Colorado November 22 1 1961 Mro John Curtice Water Departnsnt City of Englewood Po Oo Booe 178 Jihelewood1 Colorado Re: Distributor•s Can.tract Noo 23 'With Mro Leonard DeLue Dear Mro Curtice& Enclosed pJ.ease fim a letter to Mro DeLue dated February u, 1953, over the signature of Mro Eo Lo !Aosley1 Manager., Board of Water Can- missioners, concerning the tact that Distributor's Contract Noo 23 was terminated as of February U, 19530 Thie letter l.S all of the information I could f'ind regarding the termination of Contract Noo 2.3 by the Denver Board of Water Commissioners with Mro Leonard DeLueo WJF:hn Enclosure Yours very truly, /s/ Wayne Jo Fowler Assistant Attorney" -2- "February n, 1953 Mro Ieonard De Lua l5 36 Welton Street Denver, Colorado Dear Mr o De Lue: Under date of December 1.6, l9Sl the Board or Water Commissioners and you entered into Distributor•s Contract Noo 23, which contract 11as concerned with f'nrnishing water to the area generall;y knORn as Cherey Hills· Rancho 2nd Amended Filing and Cherey Hilla Rancho )rd Amended Filing, Arapahoe County, Colorado. You are no longer recei~ water from the Board for the area in questiono Consequent:cy-you are advised that said Distributor's Contract No" 23 is terminated .forthwitho Ve17 truly yours, /S/ Eo Lo Mosley, Manager WSS:da bci Service Division Legal Division" Mro Babcock, Utilities Director, explained that upon purchase of the 12 inch water ma.in in South Clarkson from the Denver Board of Water Comnissioners, service by Englewood to this private lfelter JJAin was "inherited" arid "accepted" without negotiating a formal contract with the owner ot too maino Mro Babcock explained further, however, that both City policy and City Ordinance provisions set out that the City of &lglewood will not furnish water out- side th9 city limits, except where the individual. services a.re to property within a legally formed water district; ar, where the property is abutting the city limits; or, as in this case, where the service is to property adjacent to an existing printe line in pl.ace pr-ior to the City of Englewood taking over water system from Denvero The latter situation is subject to the eam conditions required far a Distributor•s Contract which calls for strict ~intenance by the <Mner or owners~ After sone discussion~ Brownswell moved, Oliner 1 seconded, That a letter be written to Mr. Brauchll1 as representative of Mr .. Ieonard DeLue, indicating tha.ti under the apparent circumstances ~ and since the City" of Englewood would not maintain or repair the private min in Cherry Hills Rancho, which might subject the water users thereon to a lack of water, for an indefinite period of time, in case of a water nain break, the Englewood Water and Sewer Bo..,rd would be in favor of, aD1 recommend, the formtion ot a legal water district with whan a Distributor•s Contract could be negotiated, b7 the City of &ngl•ood, for the protiecticm of all or the userse Ayess Brownewell, Frantz, K:reiling, Olin.er~ Robohm Nays: None Absent: Braun, Purcell --- Mro Richard Banta, Attorney, representing the Southgate Sanitation District., appeared to further di8CUSB possible consideration by the Board for a City conmitment .for future inclusion of certain lands located in Sections 19 1 20 and 29, TCMnship ; South., Range 67 West 1 Arapahoe COUnty 1 to facilitate the procuremnt of easemmts and rigb:ts-of-way for that district•s sewer outfall lineo (Also see Water and Sewer Board minutes of meting of September 6, 1961. ) To t.he disoussion of September 6, 1961, Mr. Banta desired to ~ further that a federal grant in tbe amount ot $1.0S,ooo, for sewer canstructian baa been assured the district, but that certificate of title .for tha easen:ents must be present,edo Mro Banta indicated that the OPtner& of land encompassing the necessary easenenta are st,Ul not agreeabls to giving of easm.ents unless the cannd.tment for .future inclusion of their la.ms is tarthcaming by the district with necessary approval by the City of Englewoodo llro Banta stated that ccmdemnation for the necessary easements would proba~ lead to a cost ot as much add1tiona1 expenae ae tLS,ooo to tm districto Mro Banta advised that, though the Board of Directors of Southgate Sanitation District is aware of the problem relJitive to the maintenance of the Englewood Dam, situated in Section 29, above nention.ed, they do not feel that they should involve sane in their negotiations with the property 0111>ere far easements and rights-of' ... a7 tar tlleir sewer lineo After same further discussion, Brownawell moved, Ol.iner1 seconded: That the Englewood Water and Sewer Board would be favorable to a commitment for future inclusions of lam, m Sections 19, 20 arxl 29 1 T S s, R 67 w, Arapahoe County, into the S011thgate Sanitation District" 1t representatives of the City of Englewood and South- gate Sanitation District oan develop a!ld execute a satisfactory agreenent; between the Olfners of lam 1n said sectiana and the City of linglewood, to provide for access to Englewood Dam, which is also located 1D Section 29, T S s, R 67 w, tor maintenance b7 the City of Engl.ewoodo A~u Browne&ell_. Franta, Kreiling1 Oliner, Robohm Nayes None Absents Braun, Purcell --- The follaaing letter, under date of December ll, 1961, from South Arapahoe Sanitation District, was received and reads "Shivers, Banta & J.b!lartin A ttomeys At Law Noo 2 Sherman Building 3h70 South Sherman Street Englewood, CQlorado Decanber ll.1 1961 Honorable Water &nd Sewer Advisory Board City or Englawood Cit,y Hall Englewood, Colorado Atteuliiont Mrci Harold Babcock, Utilitiefl Director Re: South Arapahoe Sanitation District Gentlemena On behalf of South Arapahoe Sanitation District, Arapahoe County, Colorado, I wish to ad"ise that a petition for inclusion of the hereinafter described parcel or real estate has been filed wi tb the Board of Directors by the '1'fner of said parcelo The Board of Directors of tbe District has authorized the publication ot notice of bearing on the petition to be held, and in accordance with Paragraph 6 of the Cormector•s Agreement dated November 8, 19.57, consent to the inclusion must be obtained from the City of inglawoodo The Board or Directors hereby makes application to the City for approval of the proposed inclusion and for an amendment to the Con- nector' a Agreement authorizing service within such included areao The name of the petitioner and the legal description ot the parcel proposed to be included is as follows: Iacma Ao Orr h!'14 Vine Street Denver~ Colorado -4- That part of the E! or the NWi ot Section 23, Township S South., Ra:nge 66West, .former:Qr platted and described as Plots or Blocks 6 and 71 Valley Park, DOif vacated, Arapahoe County, Colorado; except that part thereof con- veyed by Warranty Deed recorded August 101 19SO in Book 6~ at page 428 of the records ot tl8 Clerk and Recorder of Arapahoe County, Coloradoo As you will recall, the property in questicn was heretofore approvud tor inclusion b;r the Cit7 ot Englewoodo However, as you were advised. at that time, the petition was withdralm am inclusion was never affectedo Your earliest consideration ot this matter will be appreoiatedo Yours very truly, SOUTH ARAPAH<E SANl'l'ATION DIS'mICT RLB:abo By-1 /S/ Richard Lo Banta, Jro 1 Att°"!& Propossd supplement to tte Comector' a Agreensnt is enclosedo After short diecussion, Ollner moved, Robobm, seconded, 'lhat the Water and Sewer Board raoomnend to City Council that the lam described in the letter just read, be allowed to annex to the South Arapahoe Sanitation Distric~ by Supplemental Agreemnt .. Ayes: Brownewell,·· Frantz, Kreiling, Ol.inar1 Robohm Nayes None Abaentc Braun, Purcell --- As a result of discussions held between the Englewood Water and Sewer Board and members or ti. Board ot Directora ot the Valley Water Distr ict and the Valley-Sanitation District, on November 1, 1961.~ the follor11ng letters werft received and read for informations "VALLEY WATER DI.STRI:oT Po Oo Box 67 Littleton, Colorado Mro Harold Babcock Director of Utilities City ot .Bhglewood City Hall Iiloglewood, Colorado Dear Mro Babcock: NOV'ember 30, 1961 The Board of Directors discussed the Cit}' of &ngl.ewood request, as presented at your councU. mtet1ng1 t4 utilize the District• s 10" water main on W o Stanford in order to provide water service to the area known as Pleasant V:iew o It was the dedision or the Board that perm:isaian to use the 10" main can be granted, subject to the execution -5- ot a legal a~ment. ccmcerning such use. The Board has advised the District's attorney, Mr .. Clarence Bartholic, of the City's request and he is now preparing a draft or agreement ror presentation to City' Councilo The entire agreement will also be conditioned on the District's Engineer, Mr. Dale Ho Rea, appl"OVing tlB point of entry of water into the District• s system and the point of discharge into Pleasant View areao The agreement will also provide far the City to assume any and all costs in- vo1ved1 now or in tm .future, in connection with use o£ the 10" maino For further information on proposed agreenent please contact Mro Bartholioo Sincerely yours, VALLEY WATER DIB'ffiICT FTB/bw By: /s/ Fred T. Burnett. Pres o cc: ltro Clarence Bartholic Mro Dale Ho Rea" "VALLEY SANTIATION DISTRICT Po Oo Bax 67 Littleton, Colorado Mro Harold Babcock Director of Utilities City of Englewood City Hall .Englewood, Colorado Dear Mr" Babcock: November 30, 1961 The Board of Directors discussed the City of llhglewood request, as presented at you council meeting, to scvice certain al'9aa not now within the bound.arias or the Valley Sanitation Dis tricto In order for the District to commit itself on a.n:r area, it is necessary that the number of taps involved and points of entry into the District• s mains be knarno 'lbe D~.strict also would require the exact legal description of areas to be cormected am exact ranes in which title is held• in order to proceed with annexation petitions. Any connection to be Ilfl.de would be conditioned upon receipt of the necessary engineering detail to insure that the area could be served as well as the armexation ot the area to the Dist.Tict9. All expense or the annexation and the engineering would have to be borna by the owners of the property, in addition to the tap tee set by tl's Board or Directors. Sincerely-yours FTB/bw VAl.JEY SA.Nn'ATION DIS!'RICT Bys /s/ Fred To furnett1 Preso cci Mro Clarence Bartholic ?llr o Dale H0 Rea n -6- Mr. Harold Babcock, Utilities Director, submitted for the consideration of the Board, a detailed report, titledi ANAtrSIS OF PRESENT AND PCJrENTJAL W.A.TFR SUPPIX AND n».1AND1 under date of December 1, 1961.o (See Copy attached, as a part of these minutes.) This report had been prepared by Mr. Babcock at the request of the W'lter and sawer Board at the regular DB eting of October h, 1961., to assist the Board in its determim tion as to whether or not the South East Englewood Water District should be allowed to expand furthero The following letters, in connection with the report, were :read.a Mr o Harold Babcock Director of Utilities City Hall inglewood, Colorado Dear Mr o Babeoclu ttDALE H. REA Consulting Engineer 2200 W o Chenango Littleton, Colorado November 27, 1961. Thank you for the opportunity to review your Re?ort on the "Analysis of Present and Potential Water Suppq am Demand"• I umer- stand this report ia to be used as a basis tor determining whether additional land should be B.Jmexed into the Southeast Englewood Water llistricto I find the report to represent a true picture of F.nglewood •s water supply, denand and treatm:mt as I understand themo I wish to offer the roll.owing observations on the data f'urnished in the report. The observations are not nade tor the purpose of amending the report but to emphasi$e problems that should receive attention for adjustment in order to strengthen Englewood• a water suppq. lo Treatmnt facilities by 1962 are to be .30 MGD with wells at 3o5 MOD additional CJl" a total of 33o5 MGDo When this is compared With the water suppq (dry year) onq 14.6$ MGD is available at the Allen Plant and 6..53 WD at the Bear Creek Plant, with the wells renaining • constant. at 3o5 MGD making a total of 24.68 MGDo Therefore, in dry years, there 18 a shortage or 8.82 MOD between filter capacity and water supp]3 o 2. Duri~ a wet year, the Bear Creek Plant will have 7 o5 MOD,, the wells .3.S MGD and the Allen Plant 17 o 7 MOD because that is the capacity of the river pumping planto Therefore, in wet years, there is a shortage of appraximately 408 llGD. 3o In actual practice the Allen Plant doas operate at 22.S MGD for a few days at a time by drawing on the earth reservoirs 1 however 1 this should be considerd only as an emargency operationo ?e~ent provisians should be made to supplement the water supply so that it will equal the filter plant capacity in both wet am dry yearao This of course., can be done at the Allen Plant by the construction of Dad Cl.ark Reservoir and use of the City Ditch to CO?IV'e1' the water to the Filter Planto The Bear Creek supp17 may be supplemented by the purchase of additional water rightso However, should the now in Bear Creek drop to histcrical lows, there would not be enough water in the Crmk to supp]¥ the 7.5 MGDo 'lherefore, the plant could opeJ:ate at capacity onq-if the Bear Creek sup911' was impl.ementedo This could be dom by om or all of the following nethoda, Colorado Central. Power Company wells, pumping out of Cooley gravel pits in Englewood land, puiiping direct]J" out of South Platte, or extending Brown Ditch to cross Oxford to the Pl.anto -7- 4o An immediate extended effort to increase the suppq at the Allen Plant from its lls.65 c.fs to 22.50 cts is highly importarrt.. This can onq be done by the development. of additional water rights on the South Platte River such as, Nevada, Bramn., Bowles, etco In addition to acquiring the rights, there is the physical problem or getting them to the planto This would preferab'.cy be done by changing points of diversion to the City Ditch. However, up to 3. 7 MOD could be picked up or piped to the river reservoir. 'lbis is the amount the river pumping plant capacity aceeds the dry year supply trom the river and the Brown Ditch diwrsian pipe. So With Denver•a abundant water aupply"1 competition both from Danver, and Little't9n1 will create problem for Englewood before the Wesmn Slope water .. is developed. 'lhougb the balance is non heavily' in favor of Englewood, overtures to the people are in certain areas being nade for water and sewer service into Littletcn, with annexation as the goalo Many people in the area are considering incorporation as a means of securing, police and fiI•e protect.ion, streets, lighting, etco The problem may well be similar to that 1n Centennial Acres in many respects, howe1{.er, Englewood is in no position to offer annexati.ono DHR/wc" Si.lx:ere:cy youra, /s/ Dale H. Rea COiiSUlting Engineer "Wo Vl. WHEEIER AND ASSOOIATES Consulting Enr,ineers 2133 South Bellaire Street Denver 22 1 Colorado Mr o Harold Ho Babcock Directer of Utilities Englewood City Hall .3345 Soo Barmock St., Englewood, Colorado Dear Harold: November 29 1 1961 Thank you for your prel:iminarr report. on the present and potential water supply and demand for the City of Englevroodo In re- view~ the report1 no attempt was made to check any of the figures through Table Noo 4 as this would be a duplication of wcrk a.nd as you are better qualitied to nake prognosticat.ions or future demandso With respect to Table No o S 1 n&Jtima.ted Schedule of Construc- tion", I have the folloaing conm:nxtso It is believed that fer Dad Clark Gulch Reservoir the completion date of May, 1964 would be more advantageons to the City to use as that would not push the Contractor as hard as a completion date of November, 19630 Hence, it is believed that the City would obtain better contract prices for the work for the extended construction period which would not interfere with storageo For tm Dad Clark Reservoir, the availability or water was given in your table as June, 19640 It is possible that there rray be some flood waters in the South Platte :In Mayo Therefore, I would re- commend that June of 1964 be changed to Mayo For the cab:ln-t~eadow diversions of Table Noo 5 it is suggested that completion date for the plans and specifications be August, 19620 - 8 .. This would allow more time for preparing the plans and specifications and also would permit contractors access to the site or the work prior to the winter season when the area would be snowed in. It is also suggested that the date of completion be set ahead to November of 1964 instead of Septembero This again will give the contractor a llttle more tilre to complete the work and will not interfere with the diversions of water from the Western Slope as they cannot be diverted until at least May of the following yearo As transmuntain water is generally' available in the months ot May, June am Juq, it is suggested that availability<>£ water from facilities be changed from June to Uay of 1965. On page 5, item 6,, I would insert the following art.er acre feet from storageo " and exchange of transmourrtain water far direct use",, In the operation of the transmountain system it is possible for the City of Englewood to divert exchange water directly to the system, thereby' not having to rely ·upon water in storageo In other words, the draw-off of 4610 acre feet from storage would be reduced by the extent that transmuntain water could be directl.7 exchanged to the City Ditcho Under item 2 at the botton of the page, it is believed that negotiations with Denver should also be made to obtain use ot the City Ditch .from its intake to the City of Englewood pumping plant on the City Ditcho Furthermore, it is suggested that negotiations be nade w1 th the City of Denver to use the Highline Canal for storing Englewood's trans- mountain water or surplus water in the South Platte River Basin in Dad Clark Gulch Reservoir o By so doing pumping costs to pump water rrom the City Ditch into the reservoir would be ellm.inated because the High- line Canal water would be utilized by gravity fl.ow when possible. It is hoped that the above comments rra.y be or SO!XB benefit!) Should there be an.y questions regarding them, please do not hesitate to callo Sincerel.71 /s/ w. w. Wheeler" Arter thcrough discussion atri consideration of all phases or the report by the Board~ Oliner moved, Kreiling, seconded, That the Englewood Water and Sewer Board looks with disfavor on any furthsr expansion of the South East Englewocxl Water District at this tim 6 am that City Council be so advisedo Ayes: Na)'8: Absents Brownewell, Frantz, Kreiling1 Oliner, Robohm None BraunJ Purcell After further discussing Paragraph 5, Page 6 1 of Mro Babcockt s report, Oliner mowd, Kreiling1 seconded, '!hat the Englewood Wa·t.er and Sewer Board reconmen:i to City Council that a second clarifier or substitute aquipnent be added to the Bear Creek Filter Plant, as soon as possibleB in order that its final deeigned capacity nay be attained in ti.De for the 1962 summer peako Ayess Nays: Absent: Browmwell, Frantz. Krell~, Oliner, Robohm None Braun, Purcell --- There bei:ng no further business to cone be!are the llnglew:&ater and Sewer Bmrd, meeting was adjourned at ll:OO PoMo ~1 ,AJ rn V{//, ~ -* John Do Curtice Aporoved Recordfnr Secretary the Dates Subjects Notes Actions UlWCRANDUM TO THE ENGLF.VIOOD cm COUJEIL REGt\RDim ACTION CR RECOOMENDA-TION OF 'lHE ElllI.mOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD December l.3, 1961 Possible Commitment, bT the City of Englewood~ fOl' Future Inclusions of Certain lands in Sections 191 20, &nd 29, TOllfnship 5 South, Range 67 West, to Facilitate the Procurement of JDLsementa and Rights-of- wa:r tar the Southgate Sanitation District's Sewer OUtf"all Li.nee. (See Water and Sewer Board Minutes ot the regular meeting held on September 6, 1961, at which time Uro Richard Banta, Attorney far Southgate Sanitation District, orig:inB.111' contacted tm Board, and at which time it was determined: "That a letter be written, by the Water am Sewer Board Chairman, Mr. Frantz, with copies to Englsrood City Council and the Englewood Water and Sewer Board, to Southgate Sanitation District, pointing out the hazardous condition of the Englewood Dam and the importance of its naintenance tor fiood control in Little Dey- Creek drainageJ and, indicating that, before the City of Englewood can commit itseli' tar sewer service to the area in the proximity or the dam, the oombi.1'8d avnere of land in said area must reach an agrfJGDJ9nt with the City of Englewood showing recognition ot the existing lease ot the Englewood Dam and providing for proper ingress and egress for future maintenance of saneo• On December JJ, 1961., Mro Banta stated that ~Uch a letter had been received, bllt that the district board felt ·tha'lo ha should not involve too Englewood Dam problem in hie negotiations far the eaaenents and rights-of-way o) That the Englewood Water am Sewer~ would be favorable to a commitment far fUture inclusions :l,11to the Southgate sanitation District, if representatives of the City of l!hglswood and Southgate Sanitation District can develop and execut..l a satisfactory agreement between the oarners of the subject land and +.be Ci tu of Tmglmrood to provide for access to Knglewood Dam, which is also located in Section 29 1 T 5 s, R 67 w, for maint&nance by the City of Englewoodo Respectf'll.l.11' submitted, ENGLEROOD WATER AND SENER BOl\RD By: Robert F. ~ Cha:tnan ~ Date: Subject: Recommendat.ion: Notes • • MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGIE1'iCXD CITY COONCIL REGARDOO ACTICll CB RECa.rnENDATION OF THE EmLW;O<D WATER AND SEWFR BOARD December 131 l.961 Annexation of Additional Land tQ The South Arapahoe Sanitation Districto That the following described land be allowed to annex to the South Arapahoe 8anitat1on District, by SupplsDSntal Agreements Leona Ao Orr, Owner That part of the ~ of the NWt of Section 23 1 Tc:mnship S South, Range 68 West, torll13r]3 platted and described as Plots or Blocks 6 and ?, Valley Park, nOlf vacated, Arapahoe County, Colorado; except that part thereof con- veyed b7 llarranty Deed recorded August 10, 19$0 in Book 685 at ~ea 428 of tl:B records of the Cleric and Recorder of Arapahoe County 1 Coloradoo (This parcel was previous~ recommended for inclusion, b.r the Water and Sewer Board, under date of June 12, 1961, but application was withdrawn, by the owner, prior to execution of the Supplsnsntal Agreenento) Respectfully submitted, ENGIEWOOD WATER AND SmnER BQ\RD B,y: Robert F. ~ Ch&irioan Dates Subject: Note: Action: • • MEM<JW1DUM TO THE ENOLENOOD CITY COONCll. ROOARDING ACTION CR Rll:CJrfMENDATION (Ji' THE ENGW'iOCD WATER AND smm BO\RD ANAu.'SlS CF PRESENT AND P<Yl'ENrIAL WATPR SUPPU AND DH!ANDo (The subject report was prepared and submitted by Uro Ho Ho Babcock, utiliUes Director, at the reqmst of the Water and Sewer Board on Ootober 4, 1961, to assist the Beard in its determination as to whether or not the South East Englswood Water District should be allowed to expand furthero) That th9 Englewood Water am Sewer Board looks with disfavor on 8.JJT further expansion ot the Soutt>. East Englewood Water District, at this timeo Reapectful.17 submitted, El'lGLEWOCD WATER AND SEWER BOARD 871 Ro"llen Fo ~ mliirman .. .. • REPORT ANALYS IS OF' PRES~J T AND POTEUTIAL WA TER SUPPLY A:ID DE:dAND. December l s 1961 In a c cordance with the request of the Englewood Wa ter and Sewer Board a t their meeting on October 4, 1961 to submi t a report on the .future ability of the City to supply water outside the City, the same to be ready for t..he De cember meeting of the Board, I hereby submi t the following : TABLE I EXIS TING AND POI'Fm'IAL TAPS . number of Taps no~ being served: l o Within the City Limits 2 o South hast F.ngl ewo Water District J o Valley Water D .strict (Outside City) 4o SoW o Cherry Hills Water District So Mi s cellaneous F'ringe Areas Total •.••...... Number of Additional Potential TaE_s: 1 o Wi thin the City Limits 2o South F.e.st Englewood Water District (Up to the present facilities now available to scrveo) Jo Valley Water District (<Altside City) J""o S.Wo Cherry Hills Water District 5 o Miscellaneous Fringe Areas 9,032 3,320 825 167 119 13,463 1,200 2,180 50 125 so 3,605 Additional committed to South F..~st Englewood Water District Total Conmdtted ••••••••••••••• o. Additional if Section 36 is included in District Further additional in areas on east to Holly Street if it should be annexe;.:io 13,463 3,605 171068 4!)745 21 ,81 3 --1 , 728 23 ~541 3,456 26 ,99 7 • J.' '\H 1 n .) Tota 24.68 Tl\BLE II P 0DUC'.lICY Capa.cit~r M. D. } .; ft"'ilt ~ Pl t 22 5 17 ( 140 2 .. .5 i B~ar Cr ok ·1"' r Plan I I 3 8 3 8 3.8 Present pac ..,y Final C. it. 7o5 ., s C n nn . J 5 3.5 3 , 5 o:? __ I ,., __:-~----~~~-~~ 'l' J.'.11 LS• •• • 33 5 25.0 23 29 33 r s: r 5 r. ... b 33 ... 2 • TABl.E IV PRF.S~fT A D F E ANTIC.'PA'l'ED DEUAND Popiit £'.on · Pe k Daily D mana I •lbe,.. o1 ~for yeai:o I Taps a S rv d During Summer Total eat· D .. 31 ~onth o Iill" on Ga s " M GoD .. --------er· Fel l 960 Actual ( r ear) l2D 7) 4·1,1.ioo 24.0 961 Actual ( Tet r) 1.3, 50 51,50 25 7 14,700 5$,750 27a9 6,ooo 60,600 30.,3 17 ,so 66,SUO JJ.J F'or Total Camnitt 21,813 82, . Jt1.,5 ABLI~ V ESTD14 T I SCHEDULE OF CONSTRU i .(QI (In cone :'l'ence lli th hT. ·1 o Whi;:eler) r !Comp .tion of 1 s and Sp cific tio. s ;;:;; Cl.ARK RESU!VO~ Ma l, 1962 Aug. 1962 ADI .... IB, na.-r I ,I"FftSION ug a 1962 Nay 1963 ------ ... 3 Hay :.964 Nov., 196h J,1.34.21 9,6lli 2,43000 7' ' :i 3,694 m 11 4,020 .. 00 12,31·0 4,h00..,00 lJ,5 0 S,4?o .. oo 7, 0 il7bTiltyo.t:~ fr F cili y Hay 196 May 1965 • FRO 1 A ANAI.. IS THE ABOVE Tf.BLES TI FOIJ..Ot'I, 1G SITUATIOJS PaESENT TitEHSELVES, B. SEO 00 A I Y~:AR. 1 They ar 1962 is tle last ye r that we can expect t-0 get by without a t iction or p rchase of raw water, ~nd the onl"' 2. 3. if we h 1 or better sm ... er~ ~ r 1963 it 1a aoubtful that restrictions wi1.1 md sufficiently alo. e., It culd pp ar that f ditio t r would be necessary if the are dd i ch v ar in c ordanca with total Th total t ps c 't ·ed is 2 ,813 rich incl id .. s l 11 245 tap c .itted to the South ~.ast g ewo later Di tr_ct hich is h, 745 more ta.ps tha the cc.;pac · t 1 of the Di!.1tri t s syst .. o This repre e1t es tmat d pcr>ulation of 82,900, requiring ape k d an· of 11.5 1.G r~ duri g ry o ner periodn (TABLES I l IV< I Sine the 21 813 aps lre ~Y committed cru~d re• ui_e 111 450 Acre F t for three dry sun:mer onths and e only have auf:t ci nt ter to supply 6/~40 ere ~eat r.r ng the three e · ur onth , ther~ wo ld · · ve to be 3. dr w-off of 4,6.lo Acre F et fr en sto age d/or xc ui.nge of tr nsmountain wnter for direct use t k up the diff erenc ~ There re so m.a11y unlo'lo·m factors involved in t. e whole trans- mo ntain undertaking that it appear to b · p ssible to de- temine at this time ho inuch ·~ransmountain ter actually n be delivered to the stcn!g reservoir .:n ny one Y-r, 01 an var ge per ve !'. 8.. Th er.a are always ore potential d g rs whe·n it is necessary to operate a plant for any length of t;'m· at its full caphcity .. The failur of any pha e of supply and/or pr uction could re ult in maj()r catas··.r phe. - 4 ... • C0.~'.11 T011S 'I' e follow1n0 factors play ru imp rt.ant part cs to wheth r r not. the e"'tir"'..ated dew..'3nd and supply will actually ' terialize: 1.. Rate of ·e'i elopnent. of the South E3..st Engle' cod Water District 2.. The we ther cycle for the next four years 3 No actua.-e:>..-perience er cr:i.te ion ai.) · o t of water tha can be expscted from tran actua mount "k1in di er · ons" However it appears o be ur.wise · o 1J an o .} o:r than for adv rse con i tions o The r esi.dents of ...,'nglewood should b protected f o, an, po • .i>ible restrict onso fuile :;;-• ictione could be :unpo ed on outsid Cl stomers, the oY rall re•mlt.ing de<.!re se in conSUlllDtio 1 a1d be com- p!r tively small for m~tcrad acccum~s unless 1,,he rest. iction_ wou b consid0rably nore dr stic than -iust evary other da. sp ·n lin • '.l'.S FOLLL, I rr; Ar.....: UY rSC!: ~!~\1 n:IP!:S .e..;.;JJ n :r : 1'Cl i i-1 ~ ?Hn'1'"' n.r FOR Th'"E m, T FOU, YEJ'.Rs~ l"' Pro•:;oe 1 dth all possible speed with the o stn.icti of the prop'sed D d lark Gulch sto?age reservoir and the fac 0 li'ties for develop ent ana transfer of west.em slop water., 2.. CONSUUl·lA.mg NE..iO'II 1T-:ons \/ITH IENVER :?OR USE OF CITY DT GI FOR TRA1'J PORTING J 'l fill FRO:l IT..> HI~\JY-.7ATb 'IO "IE P ,.JP ING PI.Jl.'1T OPI osrrl'; Tri~ R~'1ERl/1 1m, ~~D I'ilQ:.r T& RESER.!OIB TO oun ;·J1I.I P n.T ill DLf.JT. 'lne Engin ers nc , to know as socin as pos not we are go g to be abl, to use the alt mat if necessar.1, ot 1 inv 1 - irn-and .qlense for aesign on c: .3.. THAT NEG ·rD 10.JS B C,.'JAL AS A~ AL'IK'NATE OUTE 1''(R S'ICRI rG RA~ SJOU:HA .... ! ' 1UID SlffiPI.U3 ·1 'Pfil<. I' TH!!: SO! rH PLA'l'TE !iI~....R BASL~ IN PROF 0.SED :U '\.D CI.!\:1K GI CH RESFRVOIR his wou. c eliminate the . ping costs f om th~ City DLc into the reservoir "'1 watP.r via the Highline l woul 1 b. stored b,, gr-.vi+,y. 4~ Cons rtLct an ad i:!tional I•'~---te Plant. in the are of n d Cla •k Gu h reservoir in time to e ii.J. })E;ratj on for i..he 1965 smr!:"'er s ason T e .. pacity yet tc determined .. It mir~h!; ne o on~y in the r.C\tu.re of l'>r tine ope,..a ti n for ·~he fir::;t tuo or u-,e ye&rsu 5 • So Canplete the Bear Creek Filter Plant to its final design capacity of 7.5·M.G.Do by the addition of the second clarifier or substitute equipment to cbtai11 the same resultso Th.is sho ;ld be completed for full operation in time for the 1962 Stllll!'ler pcako 6.. Refrain fro approving additional areas to be annexed to the South East Englewood l ~ater District until additional treatment facilities are co.1structed and aa~uate supply assured to justify the same. 7. At such time as the supply and plant capacity appears to be adequate for further expansion of territory it is recommended that preference be gi~·en to rounding out and/or extending the area to the south to include Section 36, Tr 5 S; R. 68 W. in Arapahoe County and adjacent areas in Douglas County, which wouid be in the vi.Cfiiity of the proposed storage reservoir and l''ilter Plant.. Even with the most optimistic estimates of available western slope water, there v ould be insufficient quantity to serve in the future both the area on the eaet of the Dist- rict to Holly Streat, and the area described above, ad- jacent to the County Line~ 80 Pursue the possibilities of 100% metering of all accounts. The elimination of lat-rate account,s would reduce the demand by at loast 2s~;J1 which in turn would result in more watar available :or more future tapso The rough draft of the above report was delivered to, and discussed. with, Mr. Wo Wo l::Jheeler, our cons1Il.tir.g engineer for the natl Clark Gulch Reservoir and the trans.mountain water developnant, dr. r~le Rea; consultine engineer f01: the South ::ast Englewood Water District nd Nr,, I.o Ro Rudd, City l1anac9r, prior to final d1"aft ci Consequently correc- tions, 2dditions, etc., were made to conform ·rlth their vieWSo Respectfully submitted, H .. H Bo j ~4!1dJff.w~ / lfarold [ o tiabCOc l< .............__ U ·,ili ties Dirac't<::r., • Jm.IORANDlM TO '.lHE iNGLErlOOD cm camcn. REGARDING ACTION CR RECCUlENDt\TION OF THE mGW'iOOD WATER AND SFJIER B<YlRD Date: December 13, 1961 Subjects Completion or Bear Creek Filter Pl.ant Recommendation: That a second clarifier or substitute equipnent be added to the Bear Creek Filter Plant, as soon as possible, in order that ite final designed capacity rrs.7 be attained in time for the 1962 surmmr psako Respect.f'ulq submitted~