Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-03-14 WSB MINUTES• • • WATER AND SEWER BOARD MINUTES March 14, 2006 The meeting was called to order at 5 :04 p.m. Members present: Members absent: Also present: Clark, Moore, Cassidy, Wiggins , Oakley, Habenicht Burns, Higday, Wolosyn Stewart Fonda, Director of Utilities Bill McCormick, Operations Supt. 1. MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 14, 2006 MEETING. The Englewood Water and Sewer Board approved the minutes from the February 14 , 2006 meeting. Mr. Habenicht moved; Mr. Cassidy seconded : Ayes : Nays: Members absent: Motion carried . To approve the minutes from the February 14, 2006 Englewood Water and Sewer Board Meeting. Clark, Moore, Cassidy, Wiggins, Oakley, Habinecht None Burns, Higday, Wolosyn • • • 2. 1045 W. STANFORD AVE . Bill McCormick, the Utilities Department's Operations Supt., appeared to discuss Mr. Kermmoade's claim that the steep slope next to the City Ditch is causing his chain link fence to lean and his porch to separate from his house. Mr. Kermmoade has indicated that he would like to see the City Ditch piped in this area so he can obtain permission to maintain and use the new area created after the ditch is enclosed. Bill noted that stormwater runoff from his yard could be an issue and a structural authority had determined that the porch had not adequately been tied to the house with rebar. It was noted that the policy has been not to pipe the ditch unless a City need is determined. The Board concurred that the existing policy should apply to the section of City Ditch behind 1045 W . Stanford Ave. 3. WATER RIGHTS REVIEW. The Board received a copy of the 2005 Water Rights Review for the Annual Report from David Hill , Englewood 's Water Attorney . 4. INITIAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM EVALUATION MODEL (IDSE). A study has been proposed to develop a hydraulic model of Englewood's distribution system to determine water age in the system and to create a monitoring plan to assist the City in meeting the intent ofEPA's mandate for an IDSE. The model would show pressure zones , water flows, residuals , pipe sizes , looping along with other variables within the distribution system. The model will ultimately be a working tool for the Utilities Department and assist with future planning, development and maintenance. The Utilities Department received five bids, with MacTec being the recommended low, acceptable bidder at $38,000 . Utilities Department staff reviewed MacTec and deemed them technically acceptable while meeting State approval standards. Mr. Oakley moved; Mr. Clark seconded: Ayes: To recommend Council approval ofMacTec in the amount of $38,000 for the Initial Distribution System Evaluation Model . Clark, Moore, Cassidy, Wiggins , Oakley, Habinecht • • • Nays: None Members absent: Burns, Higday, Wolosyn Motion carried. 5. DAVID HILL 'S REVIEW OF PENDING WATER RIGHTS ISSUES. Stu discussed Mr. Hill's review of pending water rights issues. Issues have involved the FRICO change case and two appeals of the Central Colorado Farm Wells case. 6. INFORMATIONAL ARTICLES: A. Article from Arber & Associates, "Endocrine Disruptor Compounds." B. The Board received a copy of this article that discusses endocrine disruptor compounds, which are a group of chemicals that have been identified as have the potential to cause adverse health effect in humans and wildlife. News Release from Denver Water, "Water Board approves tap fee adjustments ." The Board received a notice that Denver's Board of Water Commissioners has voted to adjust tap fees for new customers effective April 10 , 2006. Tap fees will increase 7. 8% on average to covers costs of adding water capacity needed by new and future water customers. An average water tap fee for an 8,500 sq. ft . lot will now be $5,165. C. Article from the Littleton Independent, "Council flushes Clark 's sewer tap plan." The article notes that Littleton City Council voted 5-2 on February 21 to reject Councilman Doug Clark's sewer fee proposal, which would have raised tap fees to as much as $10,282. per new home. D . Article from Rumbles, "TMDL Outcome." An article by Kirk Petrik, with Brown and Caldwell, discusses the difference between implementing a "daily average" versus an originally anticipated "monthly average." • • 7. ALLEN PLANT ALUM RESIDUALS REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL. Alum sludge is produced by the settling process and filter backwashing at the Allen Filter Plant. Because of naturally occurring radioactive material, sludge disposal has been an on-going challenge and debate with BP A. The bid is a sole source because the disposal site must be approved by the State Health Department as an allowed site for properly disposing of residuals resulting from normal sludge removal operations. A proposal was received and accepted from Waste Management for the amount of $49, 7 68 for disposing of approximately 800 yards of alum sludge. Mr. Cassidy moved; Mr. Habenicht: Ayes: Nays: Members absent: Motion carried. To recommend Council approval of the proposal for the Allen Filter Plant Residuals Removal and Disposal Service to Waste Management in the amount of $49,768. for disposal of approximately 800 cubic yards of alum sludge . Clark, Moore, Cassidy, Wiggins, Oakley, Habinecht None Burns, Higday, Wolosyn 8. GOOSE/WATER QUALITY ISSUES. Bill McCormick appeared before the Board to discuss the problem of the 500 to 1,000 geese that winter at the Allen Plant on the North Reservoir, creating a potential health hazard. In the past, using a shotgun to fire shell-crackers (a noise-making fireworks-type shot), has been an effective method to scare geese off the two reservoirs at the Allen Plant without harming the birds. An Administrative Policy dated September 13, 2000 regarding violence in the workplace states that the City of Englewood's working environment should be free from "the use of • weapons or the carrying of weapons onto our premises." In order to allow a shotgun at • • • the Allen Treatment Plant for use with these noise-making shots, the City must amend the Englewood Municipal Code and change the City Manager's Administrative Policy. Bill showed the Board pictures of a red/black plastic starter pistol that is not categorized as a firearm and could be used to effectively scare geese. Lt. Tom Vandermee with the Englewood Police Department has determined that this may be an acceptable alternative to the shotgun. Bill will be contacting Wayne Oakley to witness the effectiveness test of the proposed starter pistol. The meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m. The next Water and Sewer Board meeting will be Tuesday, April 11, 2006 at 5:00 p.m. in the Community Development Conference Room. · Respectfully submitted, Cathy Burrage Recording Secretary