HomeMy WebLinkAbout1960-08-18 PZC MINUTESI
I
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD ·PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Minutes of August 18, 1960
Page 503
The Planning Session was called to order by Vice Chairman Rice at 8:10 P. M.
Members Present: Hill, Romans, Kreiling, Rice
Munns, Nies, Ex-officio
Members Absent: Martin, Kelley
ITEMS OF BUSINESS
I. Delaware Heights
0. K. Insley Subdivision 22-58 Hearing No. 9-60C
April 7, 1960 355 W. Belleview 1 Block North of
Belleview between
Cherokee and Elati-
Delaware Alley.
Kreiling moved:
Hill seconded: That the hearing be opened.
The motion carried unanimously.
Sta f f report: The Planning Director displayed the final plan for the Delaware Heights Sub-
division. He pointed out that Lot No. 16 was less than the required size,
but recommended waiver of this deficiency in the interests of good subdivision
design. Adjoining property owners were notified in compliance with the sub-
division regulations.
The Chairman asked for comments from the people present concerning this subdivision.
There being no interested parties pr esent,
Kreiling moved:
Hill seconded: That the hearing be closed.
The motion carried unanimously.
Romans moved:
Hill seconded: That the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council
that inasmuch as there was no objection by the adjoining property owners,
the final plan be approved with the waiver of the above mentioned
deficiency.
The motion carried unanimously.
II. Wilson Investment Co.
855 W. Oxford
Oxford Heights Subdivision
W. Oxford, between Huron
and Inca, South of Nassau.
Hearing No. 15-60
March 24, 1960
April 7, 1960
Staff Report:
Hill moved:
Romans seconded:
The preliminary design of the proposed subdivision was shown indicating
compliance with subdivision regulations and acceptance by the City
Engineer. Certain lots in the subdivision will have a frontage approxi-
mately 1 1 /2 feet less than the required 60 feet. A 6 foot reserve
strip has been requested to prevent frontage on the cul-de-sac by owners
of adjoining property who will not sell their land to allow South Inca
Street to be extended southward.
That the preliminary plot plan be approved subject to the City
Engineer's recommendations.
The motion carried unanimously.
III. KLZ Shopping Center Hearing No. 36-60
There was an unscheduled and informal hearing on the above subject with residents of Hampden
Hills and Cherry Hills Heights. A general discussion brought out the following thoughts:
1. There are many adequate shopping centers accessible to the area; Englewood, Dry Creek,
Brookridge, Woodlawn, Littleton, University Hills, Cherry Creek and soon Happy Canon
Center.
2. The residential area would probably decrease in value while the immediate commerc ial
area would increase in value.
3. The increase in traffic through the residential area and past schools would be hazardous
to children.
4. Such a project would aggravate the drainage problem in the area, especially during the
spring run-off.
5. Sh o pping center would bring an undesirable element; shop lifters, burglars, hot rodders,
and bar flys.
6. The noise and lights are objectionable.
7. The area is needed for schools and parks.
Page 504
Mr. Hill asked the people present if they would have any objections to high class apartments
in the area.
The people did not have any objections to nice apartments.
IV. Mr. Walter Erwin Vacation of Alley Hearing No. 29-60E
June 9, 1960
Romans Moved:
Hill seconded:
In 5000 Block Between
South Broadway and
South Acoma.
June 23, 1960
July 7, 1960
July 22, 1960
That the Planning and Zoning Commission inform Mr. Erwin that the request
for vacation of the alley be denied for the following reasons:
1. The Commission does not feel it is good policy to vacate alleys in
commercial areas.
2. Vehicles would probably have to unload on Broadway.
3. Unless streets or alleys run westward into the property from
Broadway through to Acoma, the north end of the remaining alley
would be dead-ended with no turn around or egress.
4. Although pres e n t zoning on the west half of the property (along
Acoma)is used for parking, this use is not being exercised. The
parking zone, when used, would be aided by the additional ingress
and egress afforded by an alley.
5. Because of so much confusion of land usage and pattern, caution
should guide any further changes.
6. Should the property ever be sold for normal commercial purposes, an
alley would be an asset.
7. Recovering a vacated alley is a difficult operation.
The motion carried unanimously.
V. ICRPC Correspondence
Staff Report:
Romans moved:
Kreiling seoonded:
The Planning Director stated that ICRPC had asked for the support of tre
Planning Commission for electronic data center which would collect such
information as land use, condition, occupancy and type of structures,
origin and destination of occupants, etc.
An idea for a map center was presente d, wherein the counties, cities and
districts within the metropolitan area could readily obtain prints of up-
to-date, accurate maps in standard scales. This service could possibly
be supplied by ICRPC and be of more value than the electronic data center.
That inasmuch as there are other areas, such as a map center, which are
more vital and m uc ~ of the ,data information can be obtained elsewhere,
that the support be denied.
The motion carried unanimously.
VI. Apartment Buil:ling Heights
Staff Report: The height of apartments in R-3-B and R-3-A zones is outmoded according
to our Building Inspector. It should be Garden Level and 3 in the R-3-B
and Garden Level and 4 in the R-3-A.
The Commission recommended that the staff study the problem and make a recommendation to the
Commission.
The Commission recessed at 11:00 P. M. to be reconvened at the pleasure of the Chairman to
consider the rezoning of Hatfield-Oliner area and access to school property from H:ighway #70.
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
Date:
Subject:
Recommendation:
August 18, 1960
Subdivision
That inasmuch as there was no objection by the adjoining property owners,
the final plan be approved with the waiver of Lot No. 16 being approxi-
mately 400 square feet under the required 9000 square feet.
Respectfully s u bmitted,
By Order of the Planning and
Zoning Commission
Susie M. Schneider/ss
• Recording Secretary
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I
I
I