HomeMy WebLinkAbout1969-03-03 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet-
•
•
0
•
_ March 3, 1969, Regular City
Council Meeting
...
•
-
•
•
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
MARCH 3, 1969
REGULAR MEETING:
The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe
County, Colorado, met in regular session on March 3, 1969, at
8:00 P.M.
Mayor Schwab, presiding, called the meeting to order.
The invocation was given by Reverend Allen Strong of
the First Presbyterian Church. Pledge of Allegiance was led by
Bo y Scout Troop No. 333.
The Mayor asked for roll call. Upon the call of the
roll, the following were present:
Councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Lay, Kreiling, Dhority,
Brown, Schwab.
Absent: None.
The Mayor declared a quorum present.
Also present were: City Manager Dial,
Assistant City Manager Mack,
City Attorney Criswell,
City Clerk Lyon.
* * * * * *
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED, COUNCILMAN LONE SECONDED, THAT
THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24, 1969, BE AP-
PROVED AS READ. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted
as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Lone, Lay, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown,
Schwab.
Nays: None.
Abstain: Councilman Parkinson.
Absent: None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * "' * *
Mayor Schwab recognized the following from the list
of "Special Citizen Program Invitees":
Mr. William Vobedja, 3110 South Delaware, Englewood,
Colorado.
Mr. Leonard F. Woodmen, 4000 South Delaware Street,
Englewood, Colorado.
* * * * * *
I • •
·. ·' I !
I . ,
'r
•
•
Mr. William K. Malone, 3311 South Broadway, attorney,
appear ed before City Council on behalf of Mr. Jerry Sturm, owner
of the Peanut Parrel liquor license. Mr. Malone reported to
members of Council that a new lease between Mr. Sturm and Mr.
Blair had been executed for the premises, the architect's plans
had been submitted to the City of Engl e wood's Building Depart-
ment; and with the exception of a minor drainage problem which
could be corrected, Mr. Beryl Wallace h ad indicated that the
plans were in conformance with the City's Building Code. Mr.
Malon e stated to members of Council th at it should be a short
time before a building permit would be issued and contracts
awarded.
* * * * * *
Mr. Malone reappeared b ef ore City Council in regard
to the liquor license held b y Zuider Zee, 1001 West Hampden.
Mr. Malon e stated that he had b e en in contact with Mr. James
c . Hill from Zuider Zee, Inc. and Mr. John L. David, developer
of the Englewood Zuider Zee Restaurant, in the past few days .
Mr. Malone stated that he had been assured construction on the
outlet would begin on the first part of April, 1969.
* * * * * *
Mr. Malone reappeared before City Council and tendered
a copy of the restrictive convenants of the First National Bank
property, South Cherokee and Colorado 70, to be recorded with
the Quit Claim Deed. Mr. Malone stated that he would proceed
with the recording of the document upon approval of the ordi-
nance on final reading vacating an easement on the subjec t
property (McKinley's Subdivision).
* * * * * *
Mr. Harold Rust, 3811 South Clarkson, representing the
Publi c Service Company, appeared before City Council and pre-
sented a franchise check for the last half of 1968 in the amount
of $37,509.97.
City Manager Dial stated that he wished to thank Mr.
Rust for the cooperation received out of the local offices of the
Public Service Company .
* * * * * *
Mr. M. M. Summers, 3160 South Delaware, appeared
before City Council in regard to traffic matters within the
City. Mr. Summers stated that the following improvements should
be made to the present traffic system:
l . Two-way traffic on South Sherman should be rein-
stated.
2 . West Hampden from South Broadway to South Bannock
should be widened.
3 . A left-hand turn arrow at Cherokee and Colorado 70
for east bound traffic should be installed.
4. Additional means of access for traffic on Colorado
70 into the 3300 and 3400 blocks of the South Broadway shopping
area should be provided.
* * * * * *
-2-
. , I !
~
I • •
f
•
•
The minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting of February 5 , 1969, and February 12, 1969, were received
for the record.
* * * * * *
A memorandum recommending an alley vacation in the
3600 block South Pennsylvania Street -South Pearl Street alley
was r eceived for the record.
Introduced as a Bill by Councilman Parkinson and read in full,
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE VACATING AN ALLEY LOCATED WITHIN BLOCK
6, HIGGINS ENGLEWOOD GARDENS, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, STATE OF COLORADO, AND RESERVING AN EASEMENT THERE-
IN FOR SEWER, GAS, WATER, AND SIMILAR PIPELINES, APPURTENANCES AND
UTILITIES, AND FOR ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE AND SIMILAR LINES, AP-
PURTENANCES AND UTILITIES.
COUNCILMAN PARKINSON MOVED , COUNCILMAN LONE SECONDED,
THAT THE PROPOSED BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE BE PASSED ON FIRST
READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL IN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD
AND ENTERPRISE. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted
as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Lay, Kreiling,
Dhority, Brown, Schwab.
Nays: None.
Absent: None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * * *
A memorandum recommending the rezoning of the 3000
block of South Delaware Street from R-2-A to R-3-B was received
for the record.
City Attorney Criswell stated to members of City Council
that he had prepared a bill for an ordinance effecting the recom-
mended rezoning of the 3000 block of South Delaware.
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED, COUNCILMAN BROWN SECONDED, THAT
CONSIDERATION OF THE PROPOSED REZONING BE TABLED FOR FURTHER
CONSIDERATION AND DISCUSSION. Upon the call of the roll, the
vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Lay, Dhority, Brown, Schwab.
Nays: Councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Kreiling.
Absent: None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * * *
The minutes of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals
meeting of February 5 , 1969, were received for the record.
* * * * * *
-3-
. , •• ' r
!
I • •
'
•
•
The minutes of the Board of Career Service Commissioners
meeting o f February 20 . 1969 , were received for the record.
* * * * * *
The minutes of the Water and Sewer Board meeting of
Februar y 25, 1969, were received with two memor anda attached.
Mr. Charles B . Carroll, Jr., Director of Utilities ,
appeared before City Council in regard to sewer head tap fees
outside the City of Englewood. Mr . Carroll stated that the last
time that sewer he ad tap fees had been adjusted was in March
of 1958 . Mr. carroll recommended a twenty per cent increase in
outside tap fees and pointed out to member s of Ci ty Council that
many cost indexes have shown a sixty per cent p rice incre ase in
the last ten years .
RES OL UT ION NO. 10, SERIES OF 1969
A RESOLUTION REVISING THE SANITARY SEWER HEAD TAP FEES
FOR TAPS OUTSIDE THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD,
COLORA DO.
(Copied in full in the Official Resolution Book.)
COUNCILMAN PARKINSON MOVED, COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED,
THAT RESOLUTION NO. 10, SERIES OF 1969, BE ADOPTED AND APPROVED
AND PUBLISHED IN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD AND ENTERPRISE FOR TWO
SUCCESSIVE ISSUES. Upon the c all of the roll, the vote resulted
as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Lay, Kreiling,
Dh ority, Brown, Schwab.
Nays : None.
Abs e nt: None.
The Ma y or declared the motion carried.
* * * * * *
Mr. Carroll reappeared before City Council and recom-
mended that the City Council approve a forthcoming agre eme nt
between the City of Greenwood Village Sewer General Improve-
ment District No. l and the City of Engl e wood for the connection
of the sani t ary sewers to b e built by the City of Greenwood
Village ·to t h e City of Engl e wood's sanitary sewer s ystem upon
receipt of a c opy of a wri tten agreement between the City of
Greenwood Village and South Engl e wood Sanitation Di strict No. 1
allowing sewa ge to be transported through the latter e n tity's
mains.
COUNCI LMAN LAY MOVED, COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED,
THAT THE AGREEMENT RECOMMENDED BY THE WATER AND SEWER BOARD
BE APPROVED AS SUGGESTED BY MR. CARROLL, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES,
AND THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZE D TO EXECUTE THE
DOCUMENT UPON RECEIPT OF THE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOUTH
ENGLEWOOD SANITATION DISTRICT NO . 1 AND THE CITY OF GREENWOOD
VILLAGE. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes:
Dhority, Brown,
Councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Lay, Kreiling,
Schwab.
-4-
,._
I • •
•' \ !
I ' !
•
•
Nays: None .
Absent: None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * * *
The Police Department's Annu al Report t o the City
Manager was received for the record.
******
A memorandum from Stephen A. Ly on, Finance Director,
regarding redistricting election boundaries was received for
the record.
Councilman Parkinson requested that t he City Attorney
prepare a bill for an ordinance redistricting the Ci ty of Englewood
as recommended by the Election Commission.
* * * * * *
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. 8, SERIES OF 1969
AN ORDINANCE VACATING EASEMENTS OVER AND ACROSS LOTS
10 THROUGH 13, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK l, Mc KINLEY'S SUBDIVISION ,
SECOND FILING.
(Copied in full in the official Ordinance Book.)
COUNCILMAN LONE MOVED , COUNC ILMAN LAY SECONDED, THAT
ORDINANCE NO. 8, SERIES OF 1969 BE PASSED ON FINAL READING AND
ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL I N THE ENGLEW OOD HE RALD AND ENTERPRISE.
Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes : Councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Lay , Kre i ling,
Dhority, Brown, Schwab.
Nays : None.
Absent: None.
The Mayor decl a red the motion carried.
* * * * * *
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. 9, SERIES OF 1969
AN ORD INANCE VACAT I NG THAT PORTION OF A CERTAIN PUBLIC
ALLEY WHICH PRES ENTL Y EXISTS UPON AND OVER THE EASTERLY 8 FEET
OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 12, INCLUSIVE, ARKELL'S SUBDIV ISION, CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO, AND AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD TO
CONVEY ALL OF THE CITY'S RIGHTS, TITLE AND INTEREST IN AND TO
THE AFORESAID 8 FEET TO THE PRESENT OWNERS OF THE SAID LOTS l
THROUGH 12.
(Copied in full in the official Ordinance Book.)
-5-I • •
·' I (
1
•
•
•
•
COUNCILMAN LONE MO VE D, COUNCILMAN LAY SECONDED , THAT
ORD I NAN CE NO. 9 , SERIES OF 1969 , BE PASSED ON FINAL READING AND
ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL I N THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD AND ENTERPRISE.
Upon the cal l of th e roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Aye s: councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Lay , Krei l i ng,
Dhority, Brown, S chwab.
Na y s: None.
Absent: None.
The Mayor declared the motion c a rried .
* * * * * *
BY AUTHORIT Y
ORDINANCE NO. 10, SERIES OF 1969
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE WHOLE COST OF THE IMPROVE -
MENTS MADE IN AND FOR SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 68, IN
THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO; APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE
APPORTIONMENT OF SAID COST TO EACH LOT OR TRACT OF LAND IN SAID
DISTRICT; ASSESSING A SHARE OF SAID COST AGAINST EACH LOT OR
TRACT OF LAND IN THE DISTRICT; AND PRESCRIBING THE MANNER THE
COLLECTION AND PAYMENT OF SAID ASSESSMENTS.
(Copied in full in the official Ordinance Book.)
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED,
THAT ORDINANCE NO. 10, SERIES OF 1969, BE PASSED ON FINAL
READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL IN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD
AND ENTERPRISE. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted
as follows:
Aye s: Councilmen Parki nson, Lone, Lay, Kreiling,
Dhor ity , Brown, S chwab.
Nays: None.
Absent : None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * * *
City Manager Dial reported to members of City Council
that tests had been taken on the 4300 and 4400 block of South
Fox, which is inc luded in Paving District No. 18. Mr. Dial
stated that the general indications of the tests were that no
base or i nadequate base material was present beneath the street.
Mr. Dia l discussed the specific test s conducted in those blocks.
Mr. Dial also set forth the blocks of water l i ne which would
be replaced prior to Paving District No. 18.
* .., * * * *
City Attorney Criswell reviewed a letter from Mr. Bill
Lamm of Willson and Lamm, American National Bank Building , con-
cerning actions to be taken to issue bonds b y the Englewood
Municipal Building Author~ y. Mr. cr 'swell stated th at it
-6-
I • •
.• I {
I f
'!'
•
•
appeared to him that a new agreement between the City of
Englewood and the non-profit bu1lding authority giving said
authority a two-year option to purchase City Hall should be
executed in the near future .
* * * * * *
City Manager Dial reported to members of City Council
upon experiences of other communities in the procurement of
Federal grants in aid from the Department of Housing and Urban
Development and other Federal agencies. Mr. Dial indicated th at
a successful Federal aid application usually required considerable
time and effort of the City Council and administration in prepa-
ration and follow-through and if the City of Englewood became very
a c tive in this area additional staff might be required in the
future . Mr. Dial also requested City Council's authorization for
himself , the Mayor and City Attorney to visit the De partment of
Housing and Urban Developmen t in Fort Worth in the next few weeks
to discuss various Federal aid matters.
COUNCILMAN PARKINSON MOVED, COUNCILMAN LAY S ECONDED,
THAT THE CITY MANAGER, MAYOR AND OTHER NECESSARY PERSONNEL BE
AUTHORIZED AN OUT-OF-STATE TRIP TO FORT WORTH TO DISCUSS FEDERAL
AID POSSIBILITIES WITH THE APPROPRIATE OFFICIALS. Upon the call
of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes : Councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Lay, Kreiling,
Dhority , Brown, Schwab.
Nays: None.
Absent: None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * * *
City Manager Dial discussed the installation of a
traffic divider and planter in the 3400 block of South Elati.
Mr. Dial indicated that the cost estimate for such a facility
was $13,000. Mr. Dial stated that Mr. Sam Hill, 3456 South
Broadway, had requested an indication whether the City would
proceed with the construction of the planter even though this
was cut out of the 1969 budget -if not with the planter at
least with the curbing. At the conclusion of discuss i on it was
the consensus of Council that they prefer to see a statement
of desired action from downtown merchants prior to considering
installation of such a facility.
* * * * * *
City Manager Dial requested authorization for the
Fire Chief and the Fire Training Officer to attend the Fire
Department Instructor's Conference in Memphis, Tennessee,
March 18 through 21, 1969.
COUNCILMAN PARKINSON MOVED , COUNCI LMAN LAY SECONDED,
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE TWO OUT-OF-STATE TRIPS FOR TWO
FIRE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT INSTRUCTOR'S
CONFERENCE IN MEMPHIS , TENNESSEE, MARCH 18 THROUGH 21, 1969,
AT A COST NOT TO EXCEED $300 PER MAN. Upon the call of the roll,
the vote resulted as follows :
-7-
• . • \ !
'!'
I • •
'
•
Dhority,
Ayes:
Brown,
•
councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Lay, Kreiling,
Schwab.
Nays: None.
Absent: None.
The Mayor declared t he motion carried.
* * * * * *
City Manager Dial reminded members of City Council
that a Colorado Municipal League Legislative Conference would
be held all day March 5, 1969, at the Brown Palace.
* * * * * *
City Manager Dial discussed the opening of the library
on Sunday afternoons. Mr. Dial stated that it was anticipated
that library usage on Sunday would be heavier than any other time
of the week and that the cost of a trial opening on Sunday from
mid-March through May, 1969, could be handled within the existing
budget. Mr. Dial indicated that unless otherwise instructed
the library would begin opening from 1:30 to 5:00 P.M. on Sunday
starting in mid-March through May on a trial basis.
councilman Kreiling requested additional information
concerning the cost of Sunday openings and other information
concerning the success of the experiment as it progresses.
* * * * * *
City Manager Dial discussed the annexation of the
McLellan Reservoir property to the City of Littleton. Mr.
Dial stated that the request that the City of Englewood consider
annexation by the City of Littleton had been presented to the
Water Board at its last meeting. Mr. Dial stated that apparently
the Water Board was opposed to the proposal by the City of
Littleton and suggested that the members of the City Council
discuss the proposed annexation with the Littleton City Council
at the next Arapahoe Mayors meeting.
* * * * * *
City Manager Dial reported that Mr. Harvey Pratt,
2457 South Zenobia, had now been able to obtain a lease of the
premises of the Drug Fair Drug Store, 4204 South Broadway, and
requested that his application for transfer of the Drug Fair
liquor license be reinstated.
COUNCILMAN KREILING MOVED, COUNCILMAN PARKINSON SECONDED,
THAT THE TRANSFER OF THE DRUG FAIR LIQUOR LICENSE FROM MR. LEO
EIGE, PRESENT OWNER, TO MR. HARVEY PRATT BE APPROVED. Upon the
call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Dh ority,
Ayes:
Brown,
Councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Lay, Kreiling,
Schwab.
Nays: None.
Absent: None.
Th e Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * * *
-8-I • •
.. •• ' r
I
~
-
•
•
City Manager Di al s t ated that he had received a letter
of apprec iation from Con g ressman Brotzman for the usage of
Confer e nce Room A on February 15 , 1969.
* * * * * *
A Ci t y Council study session was established for March 10, 1969.
* * * * * *
Councilman Kreiling requested clarification of the
Career Service minutes concerning reimbursement of Mr. Kay Morris
for an on-the-job injury and the general policies and ordinances of the City concerning such an injury.
* * * * * *
Councilman Brown inquired when the garbage contract
would expire. City Manager Dial stated that the contrac t would
be over at the end of the ~onth of May and that a small card would
be prepared notifying the present customers of the cancellation.
* * * * * *
COUNCILMAN LONE MOVED, COUNCILMAN KREILING SECONDED,
THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. Upon the call of the roll, the vote ~esulted as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Lay, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Schwab.
Nays: None.
Absent: None.
The Ma y or declared the motion carried and t h e meeting adjourned at 10:45 P .M.
I • •
f
•
•
City Manager Dial stated that he had received a letter
of appreci ation from Congressman Brotzman for the usage of
Conference Room A on February 15, 1969.
* * * * * *
A City Council study session was established for
March 10, 1969.
* * * * * *
Councilman Kreiling requested clarification of the
,_
Career Service minutes concerning reimbursement of Mr. Kay Morris
for an on-the-job injury and the general policies and ordinances of
the City concerning such an injury.
* * * * * *
Councilman Brown inquired when the garbage contract
would expire . City Manager Dial stated that the contract would
be o ve r at the end of the ~onth of May and that a small card would
be prepared notifying the present customers of the cancellation.
* * * * * *
COUNCILMAN LONE MOVED, COUNCILMAN KREILING SECONDED,
THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. Upon the call of the roll, the
vote ~esulted as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Lay, Kreiling,
Dhority, Brown, Schwab.
Nays: None.
Absent: None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried and the meeting adjourned at
10:45 P.M.
I • •
•
•
•
AGENDA FOR
REGULAR COUNC IL SESSION
MARCH 3, 1969
8:00 P.M . Call to order, invocation by the Rev . Allen Strong of the First
Presbyterian Church, pledge of allegiance led by Bo y Scout Troop
No. 333, and r oll call.
·V, Approval of minutes.
(a) Sp ecial meeting a nd public hearing of February 24,
1969 . (Copies transmitted herewith.)
2. Pre-scheduled citi zens a nd visitors.
(a) Recognition of "sp ecial guests" of the Council .
(b) Mr. William Malone will be present to discuss the
Peanut Barrel and Zuider Zee liquor licenses.
(c) Mr. Harold Rust , representing the Public Service
Company , will be present to present a franchise
check.
(d) Mr. M. M . Summers will be present to d i scuss
traffic within Englewood.
3. Communications.
4a) Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting of F e bruary 5, 1969 . (Copies trans-
mitted herewith.)
\(b) Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting of February 12 , 1969. (Copies trans-
mitted herewith.)
I.e) Memorandum recommending an alley vacation
in the 3600 block South Pennsylvania Street -
South Pearl Street alley.
~(d) Memorandum recommending the rezoning of the
3000 block of South Delaware Street from R-2-A
to R-3-B.
e) Minutes of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals
meeting of February 5, 1969 . (Copies trans-
mitte d herewith.)
~ Minutes of the Board of Career Service
Co mmissioners meeting of February 20, 1969.
(Copies transmitted herewith.)
'--(g) Minutes of the Water and Sewer Board meeting
of February 25, 1969. (Copies transmitted
herewith.)
1. Memorandum recomm e nding outside City
sew r head tap fees.
2. M morandum recommending Connector's
Agr ement ith the City of Greenwood
Village Sewer General Improvement
District No. 1.
(h) Polic Department's Annual Report to the City
Manager. (Copies transmitted herewith.)
(Continued)
•
• •
•
•
AGENDA FOR REGULAR COUNCIL SESSION
MARCH 3, 1969
Page 2
3. C mmunications. (Continu ed)
~!) Memorandum from Stephen A . Lyon, Finance
Director , regarding re-districting election
boundaries. (Copies transm itted h erewith.)
4. CityAttorney.
(a) Ordi nance on final reading vacating an easement
in McKinley's Subdivis ion . (Copies prev iously
transmitted.)
l{b) Ordinance on final read ing vacating an eight foot
strip i n Arkell ' s Subd ivision . (C op ies previously
transmitted.)
(c) Ordinance on final reading assessing costs for
Sidewalk District No. 68 (1968). (Copies previously
t ransmitted. )
(d) Bill for an Ordinance creating Paving District
No . 18 (1969). (Copies will be available at the
session.)
(e) Bill for an Ordinance vacating an alley in Higgins
Englewood Gardens, Block 6, and retaining an
easement. (Copies will be available at the session.)
(f) Bill for an Ordinance to rezone the 3000 block of
South Delaware Street from R-2-A to R-3-B.
(Copies will be available at the session.)
(g) Attorney's choice.
5. City Manager.
(a) Report regarding Federal aids and grants.
(b) Discussion of a traffic divider in the 3400 block
of South Broadway.
(c) Request for Fire Department personnel to attend
the Fire Department Instructor's Conference in
Memphis, March 18th through March 21st, 1969.
(d) Reminder of the C. M. L. Legislative Conference
on March 5, 1969.
(e) Manager 's choice.
6. Recognition of non-scheduled citizens and visitors .
7. General discussion.
(a) Mayor's choice.
(b) Councilman 's choice.
8. Adj ournment.
STANLEY H. DIAL
City Manager
SHD/ij
I • •
• . .
•
. .
'
I . .
•
•
·'
Hay er Elmer E. Schwab
Englewood City Council
City of Englewood
3400 S. Elati Street
Englewood, Colorado
Dear ~la.yor Schwab•
•
-
./
!'larch 4, 1969
I wish to express my g r a titude for b e i ng selected a "Spec ial Citizen"
for ydur 'regular Council meeting held Mar ch }1 19 69.
In att ending the mee t i ng , I became even more aw a re o f t he amount of
t im e the City Council g ive s abo ve their r egul ar bu sy lives to f urther
develop a nd improve our city go vernme nt . A num ber of my close f ri ends
h a ve been members of the Co unc il and , t hrough my discussions with them ,
I had a fair idea of the time i nv olv ed bu t not of the materia l cov e red.
Being a registered professional engineer and working for l'lartin-l'larietta
helps me to apprecia te the necessity and efficiency of using and following
your published agenda for t h e meeting .
Mi g ht I sugg est, in r egard to Mr . Br own's request for rece~v~ng a
c opy of proposals, etc., tha t if time do e s not permit typing and repro-
ducing them, that a "hot" (verifax, e tc.) copy be run of even handwritten
notes to start the tra nsmittal of information.
I wa s a little curious about a twelve-year period for r enew a l of con-
tra c t s (Bowm a r, Gr e enwood Villag e, etc.) in t ha t it seems that the trouble
and c o st of renewi ng t hem two or three times in twelve years would be
g rea tly offs et by the fl ex i bility you would ha ve to adjust to newer cir-
oumstanoes tha t might evolve in that time period •
I n r egard to the Sunday op ening of our excellent libra ry, I do hope
t hat t he .extra t ime i nvolvements t hat your fine library personnel will be
subjected t o will no t g o unreimbursed.
Again l e t me s tate t hat I apprecia ted see ing the friendly but very
eff i c ient atmo s ph ere in which you conducted your meeting. I'm s ure I
express the ~ngl cwood Citizens gratitude for the manner in wh ich you and
the other members of our city goTsrnment handle the city's welfare.
Sincerely 1 ,..., \
~Cr-'ti J ~n
William F, Vobe j da \r,..f ........ < --
3110 s. Delaware Street
Englewood, Colorado 80110
' I
'T
I • •
f
-
•
•
OFFI C I A~
ClTY COUNC:I\. OOCIJ M~ rr1u . "J T
t.l .R 3 '69
C O UNCIL f .IL~ fl f G FI LE
l.~ftOUi.JLLU --L--.--AI_ ..-!"'_ Cll'Y _OE ENGLEWOOD, COLQ.
S t\ ulLL nY COLJ, C l Li'IA.~ _.., e:
BY U'!'IIURITY
URDL , CL !<0 . __ E__, SLI<ll ~S OF 1 969
,, Ul{uL A .. Ct. c.ATl • G t.AS t.'lt:·~Ts o LR ·I lJ c o ss LOT S 10
TlllWUGh 13 , r,,CLlJSl VL , BL0C 1, A c 11.I.~Lt:Y 1 S SUIW I V l SIO ,,, SI::.CO . u
·l LLG .
ldtLI t:AS the r e 1as nc r c t oforc bee n ded i c ate d c e r tain cas emen t s
f or uti l i t y p ur p o ses ove r and acro ss Lot s 1 t h rou gh 1 3, in clusi v e ,
ll lo ck 1 , ·cll.in l cy 1 s S ubd ivi s ion, Sec o nd Fi li n g , City o f e n g l ew oo d,
Coun t y of A r ap~1 o e, S t ate o f Coloraao ; and
.~tlbi{L S said e a semen t s n ave n o t been u t i l i ze g., f or utili ty ,
or a ny otlle r pu r p o se a nd , af t e r d ue inves ti ga ti o n, t:oun~U has
cle t e r minca tnat sa i d c a semen ts d o not n01v, and wi ll n ot i n t ne
f ut u r e , se rve a p u b lic , o r o t ne r, p urp o se, s o t at vacation o f
t 11c same ou l a n ot c r e at e a n y un r eas o n a b l e ba rri e r s to t 1e se rvice
o f sa i u p ro p rt y by t n e v arious util i t ies .
, 0•, Tl LRI::.FOtU:, b IT URD I. LD BY 'lttl::. CirY COIJ.'CIL OF HI.:
Cl'!Y OF 1::.. GL d()OU, CO ORJ\IJO ThAT:
Tnose e a semen t s , o v e r and ac r os s Lots 1 0 , 1 1 , 1 2 ana 13,
rl lo ck 1, .•1Cl\.in l cy 1 s S u o i v is io n , Se cond Filing , as sn o1m an
u ea ica t ed o n tn c r ec or ded p lat o f sa i d su b div is i on, t o g e t he r with
a ll c a se~ocnts af fec tin g s ai d lots , a s re fe rred to a nci r ese rve d in
t nose p r ote ctive c oven ant s r e corded in Book 6 b4 at P a ge 9 4 of t he
publ1c reco r ds of t he Cow1t y o f Arap a h o e , S t a t e o f Col o ra do, st1oul d
be , a;l u. a r e nc r eby , v a cat ed , an d f r o m a nd af t e r t h e e f f ect i v e da t e
of t1 1s o r dinance , n e it 1e r t n e Ci t y o f En g l e woo d , no r any p u b l ic
u t ilities , sn a 1 nav e any i n t e r e st in and t o a n y o f sai d lot s ,
a r 1sing as a res ult o f t he cdication or r e s e r vat ion o f s a id
eas ments .
1/'
anu passe o n fi r s t r ea i n g o n t he
l 9u9 .
In trouucc , r ead in f ull
ay of~ •,,c:z~ ,
P u b l isned a s a Bill f or a n Or d i n a n c e on t he _ C , d a y o f
l 9b9 .
Re a by tit l e an d p a ss ed on fina l r e adin g on the _.:.) d a y
of ~ : r '/' · , 1 9 o9 .
Pu b li s e a s Or d i n ance
_ d a y of /2:~ .. 'C/1'
Attest:
J o. Se ri es o f 1 9 o 9 , o n t 1e
' 1
1 , S t epncn Lyon , d o nc r by c ~r tify t ha t the a ove an u
fore g oing js a tr u e , a ccur ate and c o mp l e t e copy of an Or dinance I • •
. ' ·' \ I
I
'r
•
p assed on final r eading on tn e
and pub li sned as Or dinance ~o.
•
1969
Att es t :
.. 2-I . •
' . • \ !
• '!
-
•'
Precinct No .
Precinct No .
Precinct No.
Precinct No.
Prec i nct No.
•
OFFICIAL
CITY cOU CI L oocUMENi
'1 .. , ....
Ct7y O
c "'""'" Ov.y I C' I
r~'-1 ~
"SPECIAL CITIZEN PROGRAM INVITEES" -March 3, 1969' 0 Cf..
I • ~ I.JA~ c ·Cf? "1/t~
cfh _oul'-i 3 •-. ~.{"o c,l.. u9
~ .&.., ..:jJ
1 -Mr . John Reffel, 2650 South Tejon Street, E:,"!!~(~,oor;l . ~~. \<.;
oo ~,l..
2 -Mr. R. W. Jones,· 2995 South Pearl Street, Englewood ~co~
l . l...q
3 -Mr. L. E. Williams, 3064 /South Corona Street, Englewood
-Mr. William Vobedja, 3110 South Delaware Street, Englewood
5 -Mr. David Gourdin, 3221 South Pennsylvania Street, Englewood
Precinct No . 6 -Mr . Mike Visnic, 3311 South Downing Street, Englewood
Precinct No. 7 -Mr. A . R . Higens, 3470 South Marion Street, Englewood
Precinct No . 8 -Mr . Harold F . Stamps, 2098 East Floyd Place, Englewood
Precinct No. 9 -r . Leonard F. Woodmen, 4000 South Delaware Street, Englewood
Precinct No . 10 -Mr. Leroy Moore, 3789 South Logan Street, Englewood
Precinct No. 11 -Mr . Gary Gustafson, 4201 South Lincoln Street, Englewoo d
Precinct No . 12 -Mr . Ralph Carter, 4108 South Jason Street, Englewood
Precinct No . 13 -Mr. Ronald L. Spencer, 4690 South Jason Street, Englewood
Preci nct No . 14 -M r . Rohert J. Heidrick, 4890 South Inca Street, Englewood
Precinct No . 15 -Mr. H. L. Baker, 4935 South Huron Street, Englewood
Precinct No. 16 -Mr . Gilbert Far mer, 3175 West Pimlico Avenue, Englewood
•
I • •
·'
•
•
oFFICIAL
CITY c oUNCIL o o c UMENi
' , ... , .... """'
RESOLUTION NO. 10, SERIES OF l"\§8uNCI-r .u r ,J_,.
CITY OF ENGU: ,OOG, ~·
A RESOLUTION REVISING THE SANITARY SEWER HEAD TAP
FEES FOR TAPS OUTSIDE THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD,
COLORADO.
WHEREAS, by action of t he City Council of the City of
Englewood, colorado at a recessed session, held March 10, 1958,
certain sanitary sewer head tap fees for industrially zoned
properties, outside the corporate limits of the City of Englewood,
Colorado, we re established; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain changes
are necessary to also provide sanitary sewer head tap fees for
commercially and residentially zoned properties, outside the
corporate limits of the City of Englewood, Colorado; and, to
provide additional revenue for sewage treatment plant capital
improvements;
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED, that sanitary sewer head
tap fees, for taps outside the corporate limits of the City of
Englewood, Colorado, established March 10, 1958, be revised,
as follows:
SANITARY SEWER HEAD TAP FEES
OUTSIDE CITY
Effective April l, 1969
AVAILABILITY : Available to users taking Englewood sewage treat-
ment service outside the corporate limits of the
City of Englewood, Colorado.
APPLICABILITY : Applicable for industrial , commercial and resi-
dential service, except when other fees are in
effect by specific contract .
SCHEDULE I
Total Acreage
In Tract
l Acre
Next 2 Acres
Next 2 Acres
Next 5 Acres
Next 5 Acres
All Over 15
Acres
Less than one
Sanitary Sewer Head Tap Fees For INDUSTRIAL AND
COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, except those listed in
SCHEDULE II :
Rate Per Acre
For Connections
6-Inch Or Smaller
$215.00
143.00
72 .00
36.00
18.00
7 .00
Rates For L arger Co n n ections
8 -Inch 1 0 -Inch 1 2 -Inch
::0:1:" ::0:1:" :;tt:J:I
QJ a. QJ a. QJ a.
rtC.. rtC.. rtC..
(1) (1) (1)
f-' f-' f-'
0 0 0
*-*-*-
rt rt rt
0 0 0
"' CD f-'
I I 0
H H I
;l ;l H
() () ;l
::r ::r () ::r
( l) acre wil l be prorated at $.005 per square foot,
with minimum cha r ge , in all cases, to be $150.00 per tap.
SCHEDULE II -Sanitary S e wer Head Tap Fees For RESIDENTIAL AND
~ PROPERTIES ~ SPECIFIC ~: I • •
·' I [
' 'r
-
,.
•
-2-
Residential -Single Family Unit - --
Residential -Multiple Family Units
$75.00 Per Tap
75.00 Per Tap For First
Unit and
65.00 For Each Addi-
tional Unit
Schools - - - -- - - -- - - - - ----75.00 Per Tap Based
on Each 12 Pupils
of School Capacity
Equivalent to 1
Tap
Hospitals -- - - - - - -- -- - - - --75.00 Per Tap Based
on Each 4 Beds
of Hospital
Capacity Equiva-
lent to 1 Tap
Trailer Courts --- - - - - - - - - - --75.00 Per Tap Based
on Each 3 Trailer
Sites Equivalent
to 1 Tap
Churches - - - --- - - - - - - - - -
75.00 Per Tap
Head Tap fees for all other properties not listed in SCHEDULE
II shall be determined on an area basis in accordance with
SCHEDULE I.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be
published in the Englewood Herald and Enterprise for two
successive issues commencing on March 6, 1969.
Introduced and adopted by City Council of the City
of Englewood, Colorado at a regular session held March 3, 1969 .
Mayor
ATTEST:
~#--
I, Stephen A. Lyon, City Clerk-Treasurer of the City
of Englewood, Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and
foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of a resolution
passed by the City Council of the City of Englewood, on the 3rd
day of March, 1969.
I • •
,
-
,._ •
c ,.,..'y n,.,.. ~ r r ·:,..,l..
~$ A ULL U COUI IL Atl -~
0
___ ..!__·_ 7 .,... ·f.Jr"'Lrflrr
c,rt u".c 1.. J
0 ;:-"" f.
1\ BILL FOR ... Ncl... . E: ••o .., ,.,1.. oo t:: ·Col..
AA ORDI.AICl VACATII' A ALLEY LOCATED WlTMll BlOtl 6, MIGGINS Q
EMILEW OD QARDE S, COUITY lf ARAPA OE, CITY Of EIGLEWOOO, STATE
OF COL lA 0, AID RESE Yl a A EASEMENT TH(Atll FOR SEWER, ;•s.
WAll • AR SIMILAI PlPELl lS, APPUlTliAICES AID UTJLITIE • A D
FO ELlCTklt, TlLlP l AID I MilAl L1 lS, APP~lT EI A CIS A~O
TIL1TI£S,
WH£l£AS, t•e Planaint aa~ z .. tat c. .. tast .. ef t•• Ctty
of £nrlew .. d ~·• •oretofore reco aded t'at t•• allot ~oreta·
after dotcrt\od •• ficated> oad,
WHERE s. satd allay no lont•r ser••• aay uaeful pur~o•• aftd
tbo yacatioa of ta1d a11•1 will not , .... ••1 realt1 adjo1n1•Q
the , ... wttho~t •• oataalt•••• p_.ltc ~•• c .. ••ct1•t tba aa1d
realty •tt •••t ar esta~111~•• p~ltc read~ •••·
WHE EA • t a alltJ erataafter described 11 located tftt1,.\J
wttRta t-• Ci\1 of Eng\awaod, Colorado, and does •ot constitute
a oundar1 ltao at•••• t o tty of ntltwood aad ••1 County or
other •w•tc1pa\ity ;
10~. THElirO i, IE 11 OlDAl £ Y THl CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF I~Ll UOD. tOLOlA 0, as fell.-s:
Stcttt• 1. Ta•t tho ltrotaafter desert~•• allt1 located
te t•o ty o Eatl••oed, A~apahoo touaty, Celoredo, be aad the
11 .. 11 he?t•r vacated~
Aa allay lecatod ta l\oc1 6, Kiogtas Efttlowood GardOas,
Ara ah 1 towaty. State of oloradt. as s h own on the recorded
p l a t e r eo f. acttoa • T tr 11 bore 1 res•r••d fro satd vacation an
eue .. n a, hrougll, over, across aad 11ador t~t aforesaid realty
for ••••'• t••· vator tad st•ilar pt,o ltats . a~purteaaaees and
uttltttoa, aad for oltctrtc. tolopftoRt aad st•tlar 11aes. appur-
teaaacoa tad uttlt t s.
Att..: t:
fu 1 ••• passtd oa ftrst readt•v •• tba
~~~~~~---· 1969.
a ltll for aa Ordtnaact oa tho
119.
~ _day of
I , .... Lp.1cn yon , do h"r cv'/ ccrti fy tnat t h a-.~o v l.! and qo in ~ i s a true , accurat~ and co~p let co v of a ill or ~n
fore-
rdinanc -
i nt ro d ucl.!C, r~.a d in ull nd assl! on firs rcadin on t1e
a v o _: •. ..> L 1 l 'f.] IL , l J v: .
_?
fttLSt:
/r. ·.) i., ;:;~-r
'l 1-!n • L on 7
L i t y l: 1 r -T r • as u re r
.. • \ l
I
"!'
• •
'
-
•
•
MEMO TO: The Englewood City Council
FROM: D. A. Romans, Planning Director
DATE: February 28, 1969
SUBJECT: Thorney Rezoning
The City Planning and Zoning Commission has referred to you the
application filed b y W. H. Thorney to rezone the 3000 block of
South Delaware Street from R-2-A (Two-family Residential) to R-3-B
(Multi-family Residential). The application and required $50.00
fee were filed on January 2, 1969, and a Public Hearing was held
by the Planning Commission on February 5, 1969, after the necessary
legal publication and posting. The accompanying recommendation
sets forth the reason for the Commission action.
Because there was considerable interest created by this and a
companion rezoning case initiated by the Planning Commission, I
am also preparing a rather complete history of this matter in order
that you can have as much background information as possible before
you.
gw
I • •
\ I
I
'!"
•
•
•
•
MEM OR Al'Hl UM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL RE GARDING ACTION OR
RE COMMENDAT I ON OF THE CITY PLANNI NG AND ZONING COMMISSION.
DATE: F e b ru a ry 19 , 1969
SUBJ ECT: APPROVAL OF REZONING APPLICA TION FI LED BY W. H. THORNEY
REC OMM ENDATIO N:
Pa r kinson moved:
Touc h t on seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to Ci ty Council
the rezoning application filed by W. H. Thorney
for a c hange o f zone from R-2-A (Two-family Residential ) t o R-3-B
(Mu l ti-family Res i dential) for the 3000 block South Delaware be
approved for the following reasons: (1) The evidence presented at
t he Public Hearing showed that the area has not redeveloped under
t he present zoning. (2) There were indications at the Public Hearing
t ha t the area would redevelop under the proposed R-3-B zoning.
(3 ) It was indicated at the Hearing that there would be a large
demand for additional housing in this a r ea , wh i ch demand could be
par ti ally met by mult i -family un i ts in this area. (4) There were
12 persons present at the Hearing who reside in the general area
who were in favor of the rezoning and 19 persons living in the
general area who opposed the rezoning. (5) Protest petitions signed
by 152 people were presented at the Hearing ; however a number of
these persons stated at the Hear i ng that they would not have signed
if they had realized there were two separate rezoning cases. (6)
The applicant presented an area plan indicating that 8 properties
within the subject block had signed as being in f avor of the rezoning.
The mo t ion carried unanimously.
By Order of the City Planning
and Zoning Commission .
8
I • •
I I
I
'!
A.A YS JS AND RESUME' OF BROADWAY TO SANTA FE, DARTMOUTH TO YA E AREA.
Ov r a period of at least a year and a half, several persons have
con ac d the Planning Department about the area north of West
DaJtmouth Avenue and West of South Broadway. This area has several
1 n erest i ng aspects to investors and developers : first, it is an
'o lder' part of the City with many small, dated, frame houses
si uate d on 37! foot sites rather than the required 50 foot frontage.
On the oth r hand , there are also several larger sites in this
ar a with e ither no development or a small frame house and possibly
a ch1c ken hous e and a shed or two on a portion of the site. There
was a lso the old North School site which was of concern to the
n ig hborhood after the building became vacant, and which, because
of th size of the site (one acre) under one ownership, was tempting
to d e velopers. As you know, it is very difficult to assemble land
from several owners in order to obtain a large building site. Other
than the Broadway frontage which was zoned for commercial use, a
strip of R-4 (Residential-Professional) along the east side of Acoma
lo provi d e a "tra nsition" between the commercial and residential
dis ricts, and an industrial area generally adjacent to the railro ad
tr acks , th area is zoned for single and two-family d evelopment .
With th present economy, it has not been feasible for an investor
~o buy two older houses on two adjoining 37' foot lots to get a 75
foo frontage, to tear down these two older units and to build two
n w units. N ither did it appear feasible for an investor to pay
approximat ly $40,000 for the North School site and several thousand
dollar to tear down the building, and build the permitted eight
uni und r th R-2-A Zoning.
Thi ar a is withi n easy walking distance to the bus line on South
Broadway; it is in close proximity to the Broadwa y commercial area ;
to th Cor Area ; to Cinderella City, and to the industrial plants
such as G n e ral Iron Works. To the investor, to the property owner
who wan e d to sell or to re-build, and to the City, this area seems
o hav a lot of promise.
On h other hand, there are many older people living in these older,
small fram houses who have lived in that same house for many years.
Many of these people are now on limited and fixed incomes and are
just bar e ly able to get by because they do own t he ir home. These
p eo pl , and some of them are e lderly widow ladies, are frightened
of any ''change" in their neighborhood that they "feel" may threaten
heir property or "force" them to relocate. Also, there are quite
a f w of thes e houses being rented as their owners move into other
houses , or as they become ag d and are moved to nursing homes, or
as th prop rty passes on to relatives. In some of these cases
th owners want to "hold on'' to the property for the time being.
Th r th n has developed a conflict within the ar ea---on one side
there ar those who see its many possibilities for redevelopment
and re newal, for growth, for investment. On the other side are
thos wh o love their homes and the security of their quiet, comfortable
n ighborhood and who actually don't see the deterioration that is
r eping in around them. They don't want to be "forced " out and they
afrai d if they "have" to sell that they won't get e nough money
of th ir old home to buy a new house and they are too old now
s art paying for another one.
ng a go as February 7, 1968, a Mr. Bowen, representing T. W.
r on, me t wi th the Planning Commission to discuss this area in
r al and a 100 foot site on the northeast corner of Dartmouth
D lawar in particu lar . The Commission members at that time
t hat th ar a just ast o South Broadway and adjacent to the
or ar a had mor actual deterioration and encouraged Mr. Bowen to
l ook at t ha t ar a f his firm were i nterested in redevelopment.
1
I
{
oN a rd ~ne end of 1968 , a Mr. W. H. Thorney d1scussed he same area
w1 th the Planning D1 rec tor and s t ated that he had purchased three
proper .tes 10 t h e 3000 block of South De laware---two of them adjoin-
tog o n h northeast cor n er of Dartmou h and Delaware which gave him
a 150 f o ot building site. On these lots are two older sub-standard
dwell1ng u n~t s which Mr. Thorney proposed to remove. Mr. Thorney
had d1scuss d rezoning t he block for multi-family deve lopment with
s ev r al of he other property owners and felt hey were also in
(a,or of he rezoni ng, so on .January 2, 1969 , he filed an application
o zone the entire 3000 block of South Delawar e S t reet o R-3-B , a
mul .i -family zone district which permitted more than two units to
be bu1lt on a site with at l east 9000 squar e feet of lot area and
o bui ld to a maximum height of 35 feet --three s ories plus a
garden level. On e and two family units would be permitted on a 50
foo f ro ntage.
Mr . 'horney and Mr. Merle Eve from Par-Mac Realty met wit h the
Planning Commission on January 8, 1969 , and told the Commission that
they had ca nvassed the owners with property generally fronting on
Sou t h De laware Street, South Elati Street, South Fox Street and
South Ga lapago St reet in the 3000 block, and were of the opinion
ha many of hese people were in favor of the multi-family zone
d~s rict. Indeed , they were of the opinion that several larger
s1tes would be available for redevelopment.
Jt was ge n era lly agreed that the 3000 block of South Cherokee Street
a nd t h e west side of the 3000 block of South Bannock Street is now
d e v e lope d with rather pleasant, well-kept single family homes , and
t ha i t would be unlikely that there would be any redevelopment in
h e s e blocks at this time.
T he Planning Commission set a date for the Hearing on the Thorney
application, and believing that there was considerable interest
in rezoning in the area to the west, the Commission initiated the
qu e s t 1on of the rezoning of the property fronting on South Elati
S reet , South Fox Street and South Galapago Street , all in the 3000
block . This area, with the exception of a 100 ft . site zoned I -1,
was zon d R-2-B (Tw o-family). They felt that this would give them
an opportunity to d1s c uss the redevelopment of the area with the
res1den s and if there were sufficient interest, the multi-family
z n1ng for thi s area 1n addition to the area for wh~ch Mr . Thorney
h ad appli d cou ld b e referred to the Ci y Council. By doing it
lhis way , h Commission initia ing the zoning to he west , they
f lt th would b l etti ng Mr. Thorney's case stand on its own merit.
the H a r 1ng , th Plann ing Department and several of the
Commi ssion members began to g t calls which indicated there
misunderstanding in the area and much misinformation being
d along with opposing petitions. A "Public Notice " was in
wood H r ald on January 30, 1969, inviting persons interested
r zoning to a tt nd a meeting at Bill's Auto Service, 3700
h Kalamath Str t, on Friday , January 31st, at 8:00 P. M. An
had b en h ir d to oppose the rezoning initiated by the
and that applied for by Mr. Thorney.
~h Publ1c H ar1ngs were both set for February 5, 1969 , and Mr .
n rn y was on the agenda firs . Chairman Woods tried to make
1t tl •ar to the aud1enc that that part1cular H~aring related only
horney's r quest and only to t he 3000 block of South Delaware
r and that a s eco nd He aring would fo llow a which time the
main1ng ar a would b onsid red.
Th informa ion give n a th Hearing was such to lead the Commission
r o b f t h e opinion t hat petit1ons f1led by At torney John Holland
w r s1gn d by persons who w r no proper y owners with1n th area
as was sta ted on t h e pet1t1ons , and that many peopl e signed because
2
I
b eca s e h e y were ld that "they'' wer e going t o con dem n t heir
houses, etc.; which thes e same people later found out was mis-
information. Mr. Thorney presented a petition signed by the owners
of s e ven oth r properties in that block who favored the rezoning.
T h s e were seven in addition ~hree sites owned by Mr. Thorney.
Eleven ow ners i n that block did no~ sign his pe t it i on, but indicated
hey wer no re ally opposed to his redevelopment of the six lots
on the Dar tm outh-Delaware corner. Robert Kelley, one of t hese,
s a e d at t h e Hearing that one of these houses was bu i lt originally
as a ch i c ken ho ~e, and that he favored having these two houses
removed.
F o llowi ng the Hearing, the Commission tabled the Thorney case and,
becau s e of t he apparent confusion, tabled the case they had initiated
withou hearing it. The audience was urged to give thought to the
facts as exp lained at the Hearing, and were told that the Commission
would not consider the area they had sponsored unless they reposted
the area giving residents another notice.
Some of the people are studying the area, because they have contacted
the Plannin g Director. The staff is s tudying the entire area and
w1 ll ma k e a report to t he Commission in connection with the revision
of t he Compre h e nsive Zoning Ordinance and Map.
gw
j}r::J,~~ s ~ .. -u:s
D. ANDREW S ROMANS
Planning Director
3
I 0
•
•
t-~ty of::"
cou f::"'
'tv c,LC: '.<:~l...
...
'"'" CITY OF ENGLEW OO D PLANNING AND ZONI G COMMIS~l9N . . -/.J~t:ty.,.
F ebr uary 5, 1969 c o 0 J r;
crrr: "''-Of:" 12 !,
I. CALL TO ORD ER .
The regular meeting of the
cal l d to order at 8:05 P.
. ·tyGt..~ . ,
"~o.O , '''--City Planning and Zoning CommissiffiA ~
M. by Chairman Woods. Q.
Members present: Carlson ; Lentsch ; Lone , Parkinson ; Touchton ; Woods.
Romans, Ex-officio.
Members absent: None
Also present : City Attor n ey Criswell
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES .
Mr. Woods statea the Minutes of the me ting of January 22, 1969 , were
to be considered for approval.
Carlson mov ed :
Parkinson seconded: The Minutes of January 22, 1969, b e approved
as writte n .
The motion carried unanimously.
III. W. H. THORNEY
3000 bloc k South
Delawar e S treet
Parkinson move d:
REZONING
R-2-A to R-3-B
CASE #l -69A
Jan. 8 , 1969
Lone seconded : Th e Public Heari ng on the rezoning r equ e st fi l e d b y
Mr . W. H . Thorne y be ope n e d .
The motion c arri e d unanimously.
Chairman Woods asked Mrs . Romans to review the application .
Mrs. Romans stated that Mr. Thorney file d the appli cation for a
change of zone classification from R-2-A (Two-family resid e n ti al)
to R-3-B (Mul ti-family residenti al ) o n January 2 , 1969 , for th e
3000 block of South Delaware. Publi c Notice was given in the
Englewood Hera ld , and the property has b e en posted the required
length of time.
Mr. Thorn y
3700 S. Clarkson -stated that he owns eig ht lots in the 3000 bloc k
of South Delaware, and would like to have the
zoning chang d from R-2-A to R-3-B . Six of the lots h e owns are
on th north ast corn r of Delaw are and Dartmouth ; there ar e two
structures on th s lots at the present time . Th e s e structures
would be demolish d, and h would construct an apartment house.
Mr. Thorney stated h purchas d these lots one y e ar ago fro m an
Engl wood r altor ; hecked the comprehe nsive zoning plan for the
City of Engl wood, and found that this area was b eing consi d ered
for higher d e nsity zoning under the revised ordinance . He stated
that h had ir ulat d a petition in th subject block and th
signatur es obtain d w r those of property owners who wer in favor
of th r zoning . E1 g ht properties were Indicated as being in favor
of r zo ning on th plot plan which Mr . Thorney presented with th
petition. Mr. Thorney stated there w re three property owners
whi ch h e ou ld no t ontact, and th o her people in the block had
told him that th y are "just tired of signi ng petitions ".
Mr. Thorn tat d that h is proposing a 25 unit apartment house
on th1 prop rt y--6 lots--and is building it for investment purposes
on l y . H lat d that he will have approximat ly $180,000 inv sted
in the d v lopm nt . There will b off-str et parking for 31 cars,
1
----------
,.
•
•
whic h is l t spa ce s to each unit ; the p r e s e n t Zo n i n g Or dinance re qu ires
on l y o n e space per one unit. He stated t h e p ro p er t y h e pur c has e d
wa s in poor c o n d i t ion, and he feel s t h e n ew bu i ldi ng wi ll b e an impr ove-
me n t to th e a re a . He stated that t h e zo n e cha n ge will not chan ge
a n y on e's mod e of l iving. Mr. Thorney stated the r e is a need for
ad d itional h ou si n g in Englewood, and cited the ex a mp l e of on e o f h is
propert i es i n the 3000 block of South Delaware. Th e prope rt y had
become vaca n t , and was advertised; within o n e d ay t h e r e had b ee n 20
in qu iries about the house , and some p ople were wi ll i n g to re n t it
sigh t uns ee n . He pointed out that this area is v ery a ccess i bl e t o
the Shopping Center , and he feels it would be an i d e al locat i on f or
a p artments for employees of the ce n ter .
Mr . Woo d s asked if there were a n y one pres ent who also wish e d to spe ak
in favor of the r zoning? No o n e in d ic a ted t h e y wished to spe ak i n
favor.
Mr . Wo od s asked for t ho s e in opposition to sp e ak. Mr. John Holland
s t a ted he was repres e n ti ng the p e opl e who opposed the r e zoning re quest.
Mr. Wood s as k ed Mr . Ho lland if h e r e pr e s e nt e d th e peopl e in t his
block , or if he was concer n e d wi th t h e h e aring which would e n c ompass
th e 30 0 0 blocks of Elati, F ox a nd Galapag o? Mr . Holland stat e d he
r e pr e s ented th opponents of th e e ntire area, and presented petitions
whi c h h e said had been circulat e d by Mr . and Mrs. Coffin , and which
p e tit i ons contained 152 sign atures of residents in the area of these
two r e zon i n g c a ses who werei n opposition to the rezonings . He stated
the y we r e opposed b c au s t h e d e nsity of the area would be increased ;
the school would be o v erc rowded--he understood there was some busing
of childr e n a t the pres ent t ime; the traffic in the area will become
much wors e. He stated t h e residents for the most part are older
peopl e who p u rch as e d th e ir home in this quiet area for the very
reason it was qu iet, not c ong ested. He stated if the rezoning were
approve d , it would b e poss i ble to put 56 units on those six lots
Mr. Thorney wants t o d e v e lop.
Mr. Parkinson i nqu ired o f Mr. Holland if the petit i ons he had
p res e nt e d we r e in opposi t ion to both areas, or to the 3000 block
of S o u t h De lawar e? Mr . Holland r e pl ied the y ar e in opposition
t o th e e nt i r e a re a , and h e would pr e s e nt t h e se sam e petit i ons in
o p pos i t i on to th e n e xt h e a ri n g f or r e zoning. It was not e d that
t h e petiti ons r e f e rr e d only to t h e are a now zoned R-2-A and being
propos e d f or R-3-B , so t hey could no t be submitted in opposition
to t h e c as e ini t iate d by the Planning Commission, which involves
pr e s e nt R-2-B and 1-1 zone districts .
Mr. Lone aske d what childre n were be i ng bused to school? Mrs . Coffin
s t a ted s h e und e rstood that ther e wer e children being bu sed f rom
S a nt a F e.
Mr. Cri swe ll aske d if t h e addr e ss e s i ndicat e d by some o f th e petition
s ig n er s were th e addr e sses o f prope rty owned by the si g ners? Mr.
Holl a nd r e pli e d that h e und e rstood th e y we re the home addresses of
t h e sig n ers . Mr. Crisw e ll ci t e d four addr e ss e s some distance removed
from the a re a wh ich were on t h e p etitions in o pposition. He asked
if these persons own property in the subject are a ? Mr. Holland
stat d that "some of them most d efinitely do."
Mrs. Peterson
2806 S. Cherok ee -stated she bad circulated that particu lar p etit i o n ,
and that h r par nts had signed it bec a use they
wer concerned about her w lfar . Sh stated she wa s u nder the
impressio n th at a nyon in Engl wood who wa s con cer ne d a bout t h e re-
zoning c ou l d sign th p tition , whether or not t h ey owned property
within t h e s ub ject ar a.
2
I • •
•
•
Mr. Parkinson asked Mrs. P eterson if she was aware that ~he petition
heading clearly stat es ~hat the signers own property in the area?
Mrs. P eterson stated she had read the petition.
Mr. Veenendaal
3021 S. Elati -sta ed he owns this property , but is presently living
in Denver. He has been considering moving back to
Englewood; he did not sign the petition , but is concerned.
Mr. McMillan
3045 S. Galapago-stated they had tried to obtain signatures of
owners of property in this area , so that no matter
where the address is listed , they own property.
Mr. Summers
3140 S . De laware -stated he wanted mor e information on the matter.
He asked if there would b e a total of 56 units in
this proposed complex, and asked if the applicant had th e proper
financing for the $180,00 0 investment he said he would have? He
stated that he felt the re nt er s living in the area are considered
to be semi-p erm ane nt , and that they have the right to si gn petitions
in opposition.
Mr. Park inson stated that he was not questioning the right of an yone
to spe ak or sign in opposition ; he was pointing ou t that the petition
c learly states that the signers OWN PROPERTY IN THE SUBJECT AREA.
Mr . Thorne y also s tated to Mr. Summers that he is only planning 25
units on this property , and that he does have financing.
Mr. Summ ers s tated that wit h 25 units in the area , y ou could figure
on 3! people per unit ; this wo uld be 75 to 80 addit ional p e ople in
the ar e a . Under the present zoning, these eight lots would be four
building s ites, wit h a total of maybe 15 people. He stated the
schools would be overcrowded , because there would b e about 40
additional kids to attend t h e school. He stated the area is a
"wond erful neighborhood " where p e opl e own their homes, and he feels
the proposal would be a liability. Mr. Summe r s aske d how many
signatures were on the petiti on in f avor o f the rezoning? Mr . Lone
replied that eight properties had signed the petition for the
rezoning. Mr. Summers stated that eight properties wa s not a
majority of even that block. Mr . Lone asked if Mr. Summ er s fe lt
the three residents who said they were in opposition were mor e
meaningful than t h e eight who signed as b eing i n favor? Mr. Summers
replied that that was not necessarily true.
Mr . Woods asked Mr. Summers how man y n ew homes had been built in
the area in the las t 20 year s . Mr. Summe r s stated h e did not know.
Mr. Woodward
3 060 S. De lawar e -asked how hi g h the apa rtment str ucture would be?
He stated he owned the property r i g ht next door ,
and was c onc er n e d about thi s.
,_
Mr. Schillinger, contractor for Mr. Thorney , stated that the ordinance
permits 35 ft. in height , which would be three stories plus a g ard e n
level . Mr . Schillinger also stated that the building would have to
set in 15 ft. from ach sid lot line, back 20 ft. from the fr on t
lot line , and in 25 ft . from the rear lot line.
Mr. Thorney stated that he owns an apartment house in Litt l eto n .
There are no pets and no childre n permitted in t hat apartment hous e,
and h do s not inte nd to permit children or pets in this on e if
the zoni n g is granted. He state d he had children in t h e Englewood
School System for the past 18 years , the you n gest is now a senior.
He plans to move into this apartment house next year if possible.
He stated he wants to improve the entire area, and feels that this
will help.
3
·' ' r
'r
------
I
'
•
•
Mr s. Walsh
4 1 5 W. Dartmouth-s t a ted sh e fe lt the p e tition for th e oppone nts
had b ee n pr e s e nted with a g r e at d e al of mis-
infor ma t ion. Sh e s ta t e d t hat sh e had b ee n told t h e prop er ty could
be co nd e mn e d b ec aus e of t h e r e zoning , and that it is not true.
Mr. T ou c hton aske d Mr . Holland to e xplain th e misinformation that
was gi v e n out. Mr . Holland re plied that h e was not pr e s e nt wh e n the
pet i t ions we re sig n e d , and h e had no control ove r what was said.
Ir s . Mc Millan
3045 S . Galapago-stat e d if the zoning wer e approved, that other
properties could be redeveloped with apartment
hous e s , and they mi g ht not b e built with the same restrictions that
Mr. Thorne y has.
Mrs. Davis
3024 S. De lawar e -stated that she has lived there for 27 years, and
there have been six new houses built in that
l e n g th of time in her block ; the last was built in 1956.
Mr. Mc Millan
3 045 S. Galapago stat e d he was opposed to anything going up i n
the middle of the City such as this has been
proposed.
Mr. Merlyn Eve stated he was with ParMac Realty, and that he had
canvassed the area prior to the initiation of the rezoning, and his
findings were entirely opposite what has been demonstrated this
e vening with the petitions of opposition and those present who are
opposed. He stated that he did feel that ther e had been incorrect
information circulated throughout the area, and commented that during
his time spent in th e area, 20 of the houses were tenant occupied,
and the owners weren't eve n living in the area.
Mrs . P e terson
3025 S. Galapag o -state d sh e carried some o f th e p e titions and th e y
mad e e v e r y e f f ort t o c ontac t all the property owners.
Mr . Fish e r
3 0 8 0 S. Fox -stat e d that most of t h e hom e s we r e o ccup ied by r e nters,
and th e prope rt y own e rs di d no t h i n g to mod er nize their
prope rty . He stat e d h e is in fa vor o f t h e r e zoning, md f elt the
area could stand some "r e pair ". Th e r e ar e qu i t e a fe w vacant lots,
and h e would like to build some thing for i nvestment purposes himself.
Mr . Woods asked for t hos e pers ons i n th is pa r t icular bloc k who were
in f avor of the r e zoning to ra is th e ir hands. Two p e rsons raised
th e ir hands. Mr. Woods th e n asked for thos e oppos e d to the rezoning
in t his bloc k to rais e th e ir hands. Fiv e persons r e sponded.
Mr . Ke ll ey
3 020 S . Del a war e -st at d h e was not oppos e d t o Mr. Thorn e y b e ing
allowed to build an apartment hous e on his prope rty,
but h is concern d about the d e ns i t y th e R-3-B d is t rict will permit.
He ask d if the R-3-A zon had b ee n c ons i d e r e d ? He d i dn't fee l th e
density would b a high in t h e R-3-A Zon , and a ske d if it would b e
more appropriat than h R-3-B. He fe l t t h e City s hould cons i der
some oth r type of zon1ng, poss i b l y tha t wou l d p e rm it th e court-type
d evelopments, with a height l imit a tio n of on e s t or y. He didn't
l i k e t h e 35 ft . h ight l1mit a tion in R-3 -B. Mr. Ke ll e y also aske d
i f th Pl a n ning Commi sion wou l d c onsid er rezo n i n g j ust the six lots
Mr . Thor n ey wants to d v lop? City Attorney Cr i swe ll stated that
he ha s gi v n th opinton that s u c h rezon i n g could b e done if i t were
pr ov e d to b e for t h g ner al w l f a re of th reside nts o f the ar e a
a nd for the City.
4
•
·' ' r f
•
•
•
•
Mrs. Romans po i nt e d o u t t ha t th e R-3-A District will permit heights
of five stori e s o r 60 ft , and that a minimum of 12 units must be built
on a minimum fr on t a ge of 100ft ., with a minimum lot area of 12,000
sq. ft. Th e max i mum l o t c ov e rage is 30% in R-3-A , and is 35% in R-3-B;
however, in th e R-3 -B t h e height restriction i s only 35 ft , and the
developer do e s not hav e to build a minimum number of units as would
be necessary und e r the R-3-A Zone District. The R-3-B will p e rmit
singl e -fam i l y and two-family developments , and the court-type of
development mention e d by Mr. Kelley as well as apartment hous e and
office building d e velopments. Mrs. Romans also pointed out that in
the R-2-A Distric t, which th e 3000 block of South Delawar e is pres e ntly
zoned, th e minimum frontage for a duplex is 75 ft. If th i s block
were rezoned to R-3-B , property owners with 50 ft. frontag e c ould
have a duplex.
Mr. Woods aske d that those within the area of the subject request
raise their hands if they were in favor of the rezoning. Twelve persons
indicated they were in favor. Mr. Woods then asked for the opponents
of the rezoning living in the general area to raise their hands.
Nineteen persons r e sponded.
Touchton moved:
Parkinson seconded: The Public Hearing be closed.
The motion carried unanimously.
Parkinson moved:
Touchton seconded: The matter of the rezoning request made by Mr.
Thorney be tabled for further consideration .
The motion carried unanimously.
IV, PLANNING COMMISSION
3000 Blocks South
Elati , Fox and Galapago.
Parkinson moved:
REZONING
R-2-B and 1-1
to R-3-B.
CASE #2-69A
Jan. 8, 1969
Touchton seconded: The matter of the Commission initiated rezoning
in the 3000 blocks of South Elati, Fox, and
Galapago Streets be tabled.
The motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Parkinson asked that before the matter was taken from the table,
that the area be reposted and legal publication be given in the City
newspaper to notify the residents of the area.
Mr. Woods asked anyone in the audience who had questions about the
zoning , to please contact the Planning Director and discuss the matter
with her.
V, MEDICAL CLINIC
3601 S . Clarkson
CASE #20-68F
Jan. 22, 1969
January 8 , 1969
July 31 , 1968
July 10 , 1968
June 26 , 1968
June 5 , 1968
Mr. Baume , a rc h i t ec t f or th e propos e d me d ical c l i ni c, was present
to d i s c uss t h e r e vis e d parking plans as submitted t o the Planning
Depa rtme n t on Jul y 31 , 1969.
Mrs. Ro mans stated t hat th e r e vis e d plans show th e northernmost curb
cut on Sou t h Clarkson Stree t has be e n c losed as su g gested by the
mem b e rs o f th Commission, and the e ntrance from U .S. 285 has been
5
.• I (
'r
f
•
•
•
moved 5 ft . to the e as as requeste d by the Public Wo r ks De par t ment.
Both proposed cur b cuts hav e been wi dened as was sugge ste d by the
Commission and the Traffic Engineer to allow for a saf e flow of two-
way traffic. The park1ng stalls have also been widened to the minimum
9 ft . width . Mr s. Rom ans stated that the present zoning ordinance
restricts th width of c urb cuts to 25ft ., which isn 't wide e nough
to allow eas y movement of two-w ay traffic. It was her su ggestion
that if the Commission requires a cut in excess o f th at p e rmitted
by th Ordinance, that the Com mission should no t i fy the Board of
Ad JUStm n and Appeals of their decision for the Boa r d 's c onsideration
when th matt r of the request for variance is b efor e them.
Mr. Crisw 11 comme nt e d that he understood ther e would hav e to be a
varianc grant d by t h e Board of Adjustment and App e als on the parking
10 th "front yard " a lso , inasmuch as the ordinanc e stat e s there are
a many front yards as there are street fronta ges , and parking on
this plan is shown along U.S. 285, interpreted by the Chi ef Building
Insp tor to be a front yard according to the Ordinance . He felt
the Board of Adjustment and Appeals could also consider the matter
of th width of th e curb cuts at the same time. Mrs. Romans stated
that the Traffic En g ineer had indicated to her that he is of the
opinion that 25 ft. is not adequate width for free f low of two-way
traffic.
Pa r kinson moved:
Lentsch s econded: The parking layout dated January 31, 1969 , presented
for the medical clinic at 3601 South Clarkson be
approv e d subj e ct to the granting of variances by the Board of Adjustment
and Appeals for curb cuts to a wi d th approved by the Traffic Engineer,
and the parking in the area determined to be "front yard".
The motion carried unanimously.
VI. FIRST NATIONAL BANK CASE #9-69
Messrs. Eachan and Malone were present to discuss the possibility of
vacating e as e me n t s and releasing covenants which are on the property
the First National Bank owns at the corner of U .S . 285 and South
Ela ti Str eet. Mr. Eachon stated that the bank will retain ownership
of the land , l eas e the building on a long-term basis , and will lease
ba c k office space f or th e bank. The lease will be to the builder.
Mr . Eachon s t a ted they must get a clear title to the ground , and the
eas e me n t s and covenants must be cleared . They hope to star t construction
by April 1 , 1969 , and will occupy their portion of th building by
J ul of 1970 . He stat e d that the matter of the easements has been
discussed with Publi c Service off1cials and with officials from
Mountain S tates Te l ephone, both of which have stated they will submit
a letter to the Pla nni n g Department stating they have no need for the
ret ntion of the e as ements . There are no water or sewer lines in
th s nts . Mr . Eachon stated there are also covenants they want
us
purpo
th e land as soon as possible. Discussion followed.
y Crisw 11 tat d the c ovenants were drawn by the former
land and th City of Englewood, and run in favor of the
(i) Landlord shall not us e or permit the
any purpose oth r than that of offi e
professional persons , f1nanc1al 1nstitutions ,
adm1n1 tra 10n
(11 ) L ndl o rd shall main atn on th burdened land at all t1m sat
1 a t on utomob1l pace for eac h 300 square feet of floor spa ce
1n bu1d1ngs d on th burden d land ; and
(ii1 ) Landlord shall no rect or permtt t h e ere tion of any building
or o h r stru t ur o n h burd ned land (other than park1ng stru tures
1 ss than on foo htgh) clos r than forty feet to t he e xist ing e ast
boundary l1n of Elat1 Str
6
•' I 1
'!
~-----
'
•
•
Di s c uss ion fo llowed .
T o uc h to n mov e d :
P ar k1nso n s ec ond e d : Th e Planning Commiss i on recomm e nd t o City Council
t ha t e as e ments existing in Lots 10 , 11 , 12 , and
1 3 , Bl o c k 1 , Mc Kinle y Subd1v i s i on , 2nd F i l i n g , b e va c a ted conditioned
u p o n t h e r e c e ip t of l et er s f rom the Util it 1 e s Co mpan1 e s and Ci t y
Ut il it i e s a nd P u bl 1 c Wo r ks De partme nts s t a ti ng t h e e as e me nts are not
n eed e d .
T h e mo tion c a rrie d unan i mousl y .
Mr . Malon e discuss e d th e covenants which ar e on the land . The covenant
whi c h r e quir e s a par kin g spa c e for each 300 sq. ft . o f floor area is in
c o n tr ast to th e r e quir e ment of the zoning ordinance , whi c h i s one parking
spac e for e a c h 300 sq. ft. of RENTABLE floor area. The r e presentatives
of t h e bank fee l th e Ci ty will be protected by t h e zon1ng ordinance, and
tha t this cov e nant should d e finitely be released.
Th e cove nant which prohib1 t s any structure closer than 40 ft. to Elati
Stree t pres e nts problems in th e construction of the drive-in facility
f o r the bank. It was pointed out that there are no setback requirements
in th e zoning ordinanc e for business or industrial zoned property .
Mr. Malone stat e d t hat t he bank would prefer to have this covenant
lifted also ; but th e y will not object to a reasonable setback if this
is the desire of the City . However, they feel the 40 ft. is unreasonable
inasmuch as a similar s e tback has not been required in any other instance.
They are proposing to build the underground drive-in facilily approxi-
mately 15 f t . f rom th e e ast line of Elati Street, if possible , and to
allow prope r clearance for camper trucks etc., which would make it
necessary for the structure to be 6 to 8 feet above grade. The main
building will be approxima t ely 10 to 12 stories, and will be set closer
t o Cherokee Street , wi t h parking areas right off of Cherokee . Mr .
Eachon sta t ed the bank will lease back 30,000 sq. ft. of the main
building, and they will build th e drive-in facility at t heir own expense.
Fur t her discussion f ollow e d. A rec ess of th e Commiss i on was called at
10 :15 P .M ~ t he meeting was again called to order at 10:25 P.M.
Fur t h e r discussion on t h e s et back o f the buildings e nsu e d . Mr . Malon e
point e d out that t h e driv e-in f acility is planne d fo r a l e as t 15 ft .
fr om South Ela t i S r eet , and a t a heigh t of no mor e t han 8 1 ft. above
gr ad e .
Lon e mo v e d :
Park1nson s econd e d: Th e Planning Commission recommend t o the C i ty
Co uncil that the follow1ng covenants as rec1ted
1n P e op l e's Ord 1nance No . 3 , Series of 1964 , §23 (a) (i), (ii ), (iii),
wh ich co v n~n t s als o appear in other related documents , be released:
(1 ) L a ndl or d shal l no t us e or permit the use of the burdened land
for any purpos e o her t han that of office purposes such as offices
for pr o f e s sion al per sons , financ i al i nstitutions , admin1strat i on and
t h e l1 k .
(11 ) La ndl ord s hal l ma 1 nta 1n onfu e burd e n e d land a t al l ti me s a t
l e a s t o n e a u tomob1 l e s p a ce f or e ach 300 squar e f e et of f l oor spa ce
1 n bui ld ings e r ec e d on the burdene d land ; and
(l i i ) L a ndlo rd s hal l no t erect o r permi t t h e e r ec io n of an y bu1 l din g
or other s tr u cture o n t he bur d e ned land (other t han park1ng stru c tures
l e ss t ha n o n e foo high ) clos e r t han for ty f e e t o t h e xis ti n g e ast
bound ary l i n e o f E la t 1 Str e e ,
and h at t h e i mp o sition o f t h e f ollowing res trict 1ve cove nants b e
impos ed in l1 e u of t h e af o reme nt1one d restr icti v e c ovenan t s:
7
. '
I • •
·' \ ! ,
•
•
•
•
Discussion fol l owed .
T ouchton moved :
Par k 1nson second e d : The Plann i n g Commission recommend to City Council
that easements e xist i n g in Lo t s 10, 11 , 12 , and
13 , Bl oc k 1, McKinley Subdlvision , 2nd Filing , be vaca ted conditioned
upon t h e receipt of let er s fr om the Utilities Compan ies and C ity
Uti l ities and P ubl1c Wor ks Departme nts s tati n g t h e e aseme n t s ar e not
needed.
The mo tion carried unan1mously.
Mr. Malone discussed the covenants which ar e on the land . The cove nant
which r quires a parking space for e ach 300 sq. ft. of floor ar e a is in
co ntr ast to t h e requirement of the zoning o r d i nanc e, whi c h i s one parking
space for e ach 300 sq. ft. o f RENTABLE floor ar e a. The repres ent ativ e s
of t h e bank fee l the City wil l be protected by the zon1ng ordinance, and
that this covenant should d efi nitely be released.
The co v e n ant which prohibits any structure closer than 40 ft. to Elati
Street presents problems in the construction of the dr ive-in facility
for t h e bank. It was pointed out that there are no s etbac k r e quirements
in the zo nin g ordinance f or business or industrial zoned property .
Mr. Malone s tated t hat the bank would prefer t o have this cove nan t
l ifted also ; bu t they will not object to a reasonable setback if this
is the d e sire of the City . However, they feel the 40 f~. is unr e asonabl e
i nasmu ch as a similar setback has not been required in any other i ns ta n ce .
T hey are proposing to build the underground drive-in f ac i lity approxi-
mately 15ft. from the e ast line o f Elati Str eet, if possible , and to
allow proper cle a r ance for camper trucks etc., which would make it
necessary for the s tructure to be 6 to 8 feet above grade. The main
bui ld ing w1l l b e approximately 10 to 12 stories , and will be se t closer
to Cherokee Street , with parking areas r ight off of Cherok ee. Mr .
Eachon sta te d the bank will l e ase back 30 ,000 sq. ft . of the ma i n
bui ld i n g, and they wil l build the drive-in faci lity at t heir own e xpense.
Further discussion fo llowed. A recess of th e Commiss ion was called at
10 :15 P .M ~ the me eti ng was again called to order at 10:25 P.M .
Furth er dis cu ssion on the setback o f the build i ngs e nsu ed. Mr . Malone
poin ted out t ha t t he drive-in facility is planned for at leas t 15 ft .
fr om South Elati S reet , and a t a heigh t of no mo re than 8
1
ft. above
gr ade .
Lone moved :
Park1nson s econded: The Plann ing Commission recomm e nd to the C1ty
Council that the follow1ng covenants as recited
1n P eop l e's Ord1n anc e No. 3 , S eries of 1964 , 823 (a) (i), (1 i), (iii),
which covenan t s a ls o appear i n othe r r e lated documents , be released:
(i) Landlord shall no t use or permit the use of the burdene d land
for any purpose other han th at of office purposes such as off1ces
for profess ional per s ons , financ1al ins titutions, admin1stration and
t he like .
(1 1 ) Landlord shall main ain on~e burdened land at all times at
leas o n e au t omobile spac e for each 300 squar e feet of floor space
1n bu1ldings erec e d on the burdened land ; and
(11i ) Landlord shall no t erect or permit the erection of any bu1lding
or other structu re on t he burdened land (o t her than park1ng structures
less han one foo high) clos er t han f or ty feet to t h e xis ing e ast
boundary line of Elat1 S~ree ,
and hat t h e imposition of the fo llowi n g restrict1ve covena nts be
imposed in l1eu of th aforement1one d restric ~i ve covenant s :
7
0 0
' ' ~
•
,_ •
1. No s ructure i s t o b e permitted in the area d e scribed as fo llows:
Beginning at a point on t h e SE cor n er of the swt of the swt of Section
34 , T4S , R68W ; thence Nort h 68 feet to the North line of West Hampden
Avenue , thence West and along said North line 3 1 3.33 feet to the inter-
section with the East line of South Elati Street, the true point of
beginning ; thence North and along South Elati S treet 144.14 feet ;
thence East 14 feet ; t h e nc e South and pa r allel to said East line of
South Elati Street 144.17 feet; thence West 14 feet to the true point
of beginning .
2 . No str ucture in excess of 8 feet in height is to be permi tted in
the area des cri bed as follows: Beginning at a point on the SE corner
of the SWt of the swt of Sec . 34, T4S , R68W ; thence North 68 feet to
the North line of West Hampden Avenue ; thenc e West and along said North
line of West Hampden Avenue 299.33 feet to the true point of beginning ;
thence North 144.17 feet; thence East 17 feet; thence South 144.21 f e et ;
thence West 17 feet to the point of beginning.
Further discussion f ollowed. Members expressed concern that if this
covenant were re l e ased completely, the City Hall could be hidden by
future construction. Mr . Len ts ch pointed out th at any building that
went in would hide City Hall to an extent, but that he felt wit h
proper signing the matter could be solved. Mr. Touchton stated that
h e could see no real good reason for the restriction.
Carlson moved: No structure be permitted on the western-most 32 ft. of
this land in an effort to place future construction in
line with the west line of the City Hall.
There was no seco nd to the motion by Mr. Carlson.
Upon the call of the roll for the motion by Mr. Lone:
AYES: Len t sch ; Lone ; Parkinson ; Touchton ; Woods
NAYS: Carlson
The motion carried.
VII, WILBUR WRIGHT REZONING
R-1-C to R-3-B
CASE #43-68C
Jan . 22 , 1969
Mr. Woods s t a te d this matter had been tabled at the last mee ti ng follow -
ing the Public Hear i ng.
Touchton moved :
Parkinson seconded: The matt e r be raised from the table.
The motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Wright's rezoning request was discussed. Mr. Carlson asked wh ether
t h e 100 ft. to the south of Mr. Wright's property could dev e lop , or
wou ld it be an isolated parcel? It was pointed out that there are two
s eparate 50 ft. ownerships involved in this 100 feet . Mr. Wright stawd
he fe lt th at as one parcel it could develop , and would probably deve lop
before too long.
Parkinson moved:
Lentsch seconded: The Plann ing Commission recommend to City Council
that the application filed by Mr . Wright for Lots
11 thru 23, Block 15 , Jackson's Broadway Heights , be approved for the
following reasons: (1 ) There were fi v e persons in favor of the
proposed rezoning and no one in opposition at the Publ ic Hearing ; (2)
The structures on Lots 11 thru 19 has deteriorated to the exten that
1t is a hazard o the public , and the proposed rezoning shows promise
of relieving tha condition ; (3) The requested rezoning will permit
apartment house construction, which appears to be on e use much in need
in the City of Englewood ; (4 There was a petition circulated in the
8
·' \ !
'r
-------
• •
'
1
•
•
( (
area, and only three persons did not sign the petition in favor of the rezoning.
Further discussion followed. Some of the proposed restrictions in the
revised Zoning Ordinance were discussed. It was pointed out that the
property to the south of Mr. Wright's property would still be usable,
but possibly not to the density permitted under the R-3-B. Further discussion followed.
Upon the ca ll of the roll , the motion carried unanimously.
VIII. ALLEY VACATION
3600 S. P en n-P earl CASE #6-69A
Jan. 22, 1969
Mrs. Romans stated that letters have been sent to the various utility
d epartme nts and companies, but not all have yet sent replies. No
a ction was taken.
IX. REORGANIZATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION.
Mr. Lone moved:
Carlson seconded: That Mr. Woods and Mr.Lentsch be re-elected as Charrman
and Vice-Chairman of the Planning Commission for the
year 1969.
The motion carried.
It was moved, seconded and carried to adjourn the meeting.
Meeting adjourned at 12 Midnight.
9
. '
I • •
'
•
•
(
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING
February 12, 1969
Special Meeting , ..
c:-,1"~0(;". )
< 0 '<..;
I, CALL TO ORDER,
The Special ~ng of the Planning Commission
by Chairman Woods.
';:-~~
Members present:
was ca!~ ~~ order
Ooo "'";(~ ·-c-o
Carlson ; Lentsch; Lone; Parkinson ; Touchton ·; ~ods
Romans, Ex-officio
Members absent: None
Also present: City Attorney Criswell
This meeting is a special meeting called to reconsider the matter
of the covenants on the First National Bank property at South Elati
Street and U.S. 285. The matter of the covenants was discussed at
dinner ; the meeting adjourned to Conference Room A to meet with
the president of the First National Bank, Mr. Eachon, and counsel
for the bank, Mr. Malone. Mr. Lentsch was not in attendance at the
meeting in Conference Room A.
Mr. Eachon presented a set of plans for the proposed bank facilities ;
he stated that these plans are~ot final, and that a new set of plans
and specifications had been due~ this date, but did not arrive.
Mr. Eachon discussed the bank building in great detail; the main
entrance will be from the east, and the bank itself will occupy the
basement, first and second floors, and the ninth and tenth floors.
The second floor will be used as their first area of expansion. He
stated that by 1985, the bank, by exercising its options to occupy
additional floors every five to ten years, will have 85% to 90% of
the building. Mr. Eachon stated that the possibility of a pedestrian
tunnel from the underground parking in the adjacent shopping complex,
located on the west side of South Elati Street, to the bank, is
still under consideration. He stated they would have a depth problem,
inasmuch as they would have to come from 21 feet underground to
surface or a reasonable depth in approximately 105 feet. It will
cost, he stated, approximately $50,000 to tunnel under Elati Street.
Mr. Eachon stated the bank had a 35 year minimum lease on their
building space, with options to 90 years, and a 55 year lease on the
land with options to 90 years. Mr.Eachon stated there will be three
high speed elevators to serve 120,000 sq. ft. net rentable area.
This is contrasted to an adjacent ~0 story bank building which has
a net rentable area of 70,000 sq. ft. The building will be of poured-
in-place concrete, and will have polarized glass in the windows.
There will be a Board Room and two conference rooms on the top floor
which will be under the control of the First National Bank. There
will be a Community Room in the basement next to the elevators, for
the convenience of the public. Mr. Eachon stated that when the
original plans were being made for construction under the Bank
ownership, they had planned a heliport, but now that another party
will have ownership of the building, he isn't sure what is planned.
Mr. Eachon again pointed out that the bank will lease back from the
builder their space in the building, but that the builder has said
he does not want the responsibility of the drive-in facility ; for
this reason, the bank itself will have to ha~e these facilities built.
Mr . Eachon stated there will be eight drive-in windows, two of them
to b e manned , and the rest monitored by television, with room for
two additional windows. It is planned that these facilities will
be sunken, or at a depressed level. He pointed out that the traffic
flow is being planned very carefully to facilitiate the movement of
customers to open windows and to the point of exit from the drive-
in faci 11 ties.
1
•
• •
. , f
•
•
Mr. Eachan stat e d that h e was concerned about the 8 ft . height
limitation the Commission had discussed at the pr e vious meeting.
He stated that t his limitatio n could create problems if they were
to run into soil problems, or if they d ecided that an identifying
,. -
sign we re need e d at that location . Mr. Eachan also stated that the
bank would pr efer to have he covenants removed completely and that
there be no r e strictions on the land oth er than those in the appli cable
city ordinances. Discussion followed. Memb ers of the Commission
e xpressed concern about the preservation of open space in the City,
and in view of the proximity to the City Hall , in particular , at this
location. Mr. Eachan comm ented that h e felt the bank would have to
have some setback to accommodate th e landscaping to the "depressed"
drive-in facility.
Furth er discussion of the matt er of the haght restriction followed.
It was mentioned that th e bank could sell the property , and if the
covenants were released, a "40 story building" could b e built there.
Mr. Lone commented that he is not opposing the one-story structure
th at the bank is proposing , but is opposed to anything high er.
Mr. Woods stated that he did not feel there should b e any restrictions
on th e land , and stated that Mr. Lentsch had indicated that he also
felt there should be no r e strictions on the land. Mr. Touchton
concurr e d in this opinion.
Mr. Eachan stated that the bank doesn't have a s~d e si gn for the
drive-in facility as yet , so he could not say definit e ly what the
h e ight will b e; but that h e doesn't feel they should be held to the
8 ft. height limita tion , particularly in view of the fact that the
land is industrially and commercia lly zoned, and that it is i n the
location where it is. It was pointed out that this restriction had
not been placed on oth er buildings in the area. Mr. Eachan commented
that he felt th e covenants were plac e d on the land in the first place
in an effort to liminate possible competition for the shopping
center and the t nan t s of that development. Mrs. Romans commented
that it is possible that the City Hall could be relocated a t some
time in th e future, or that other d e velopers could erect a hi-rise
building on other si fes in this area, and asked if the covenant
would b e needed in these events?
Mr. Criswell stated t hat we were dealing with proprie t ary interest
vs. governmenta l interest. He stated he did not know why the
covenant s were placed on the land, but that it was possible that
outside interests were considered at that time.
Mr. Eachon stated the bank was to sign a leas e with t h e build er in
a few days, which lease will make the bank liabl e for architect fees,
interim financing, transport ation of personnel from Texas to Den ver
and back, and all other out-of-pocket expenses of their people
betwee n now and April 15th . H stated this could run to $100,000.
He state d they wanted to start con struction by April fi rst , be-
cause the build er has committments on materials h e will be using
in the building , and that this matt e r needs to be settled as soon
as possibl e .
Furth er dis c ussion fo llowe d . Mr . Eacha n dis c uss e d the economics
situation in regard to the building , th land , and made the state-
me nt that land in New York City is s e lling for $500 per square foot ,
and that it is not beyond reason that land in Englewood may be at
such price som day. Mr. Eachan suggested that if the Commission
didn 't fee l that th s et back r e striction should be removed, that
po ssibly the maximum h eight restriction could be eased to say on e
story, or 18 fee t , which h ight would b the same as the height of
th first floor of th e proposed bank building . Furth e r bri ef
discussion fo llowe d .
2
\ !
'!"
-------
•
'
•
•
(
Parkinson moved:
Lone seconded: The Planning Commission reconsider the motion made
a t their regular meeting of February 5, 1969 ; the
height of the drive-in faci lity to be restri ct ed to 18 ft. The
amended motion would re ad:
"The Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the
following covenants as recited in People's Ordinance No. 3, Series
of 1964, 823 (a) (i), (ii), (iii), which covenants also appe ar in
other relat e d documents , be released:
(i) Landlord shall not us e or permit the us e of the burd e n e d land
for any purpose other than that of office purpos es such as offices
for professional persons , financial institutions, administration
and the like.
(ii) Landlord shall maintain on the burdened land at all times at
least one automobile space for each 300 square feet of floor space
in buildings erected on the burdened land; and
(iii) Landlord shall not erect or permit the erection o f any
building or other structure on the burdened land (other than
parking structures less than one foot high) closer than forty
feet to the existing east boundary line of South Elati Street ,
and that the imposition of the following restrictive covenants be
imposed in lieu of the aforementioned restrictive covenants:
1. No structure is to be permitted in the area described as
follows: Beginning at a point on the sE corner of the SWl of the
SW~ of Section 34, T4S , R68W ; thence North 68 feet to the North
line of West Hampden Avenue; thence West and along said North line
313.33 feet to the intersection with the East line of South Elati
Street, the true point of beginning; thence North and along South
Elati Street 144.14 feet; thence East 14 feet ; thence Sou th and
parallel to said East line of South Elati Street 144.17 feet ; thence
West 14 feet to the true point of beginning.
2. No structure in excess of 18 feet in height is to b e permitte d
in the area described as follows: Beginning at a point on the SE
c orner of the swt of the swt of Sec. 34, T4S, R68W ; thence North
68 feet to the North line of West Hampden Avenue ; thence West and
along said North line of West Hampden Avenue 299.33 feet to the
true point of beginning ; thence North 144.17 feet ; thence East 17
feet ; thence South 144.21 feet; thence West 17 feet to the point
of beginning.
The motion carried unanimously.
Brief discussion on the wording of the motion ensued .
Meeting adjourned.
3
I • •
, \ I .
•
•
•
•
MEM ORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING AC T ION OR
RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
DATE: February 19 , 1969
SUBJECT: ALLEY VACATION-3600 South Pennsylvania-South P e arl.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends that the alley in the 3600 block
South Pennsylvania-South Pearl be vacated, retaining easements for
utilities that are in the alley.
By Order of the City Planning
and Zoning Commission .
7
\ l
'r
• •
•
•
MEMORANDUM TO: THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
FROM: D. A. Romans, Planning Director
DATE: February 28 , 1969
SUBJECT: Alley Vacation
Mr . Dan Kubby has requested the City to vacate the south 150 feet
of the Pennsylvania-Pearl alley in the 3600 block, being a portion
of Block 6, Higgens Englewood Gardens, Arapahoe County. Th i s alley
has access onto U . S. 285 and dead-ends on the south at Little Dry
Creek. Upon entering it by vehicle there is no way of exiting
without crossing private property and out onto South Pennsylvania
Street, unless one were to back out onto the Highway.
Mr. Kubby has plans for a multi-family development on property he
owns on both sides of this alley on the south end of this block and
has made this request so that his ownership will not be divided by
the alley. Please refer to the attached map. Mr. Kubby had no
objection to a utility easement being retained, inasmuch as he
proposes to use the area for off-street parking.
Because there was considerable discussion about this case by the
Planning Commission, I shall try to give you as much information ~
I can upon which you can base your action.
This request was referred to the various City and private utility
departments for their consideration and recommendation. The staff
requested them to consider the vacation of the south 150 feet, and
as an alternative, the vacation of the entire alley. As a result
of this survey, the following information was obtained:
l. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE COMPANY, K. D. Johnson, Manager ,
replying: Would have no objection to the vacation of the
south 150 feet. They would have no objection to the vacation
of the entire alley were an easement to be retained for their
service. They also stated that they would relocate their plant
altogether, either underground or aerial, thus negating their
need for an easement. They would run it down the east side of
South Pennsylvania Street and down the west side of South Pearl
Street; however, they would have to be reimbursed for this
relocation.
2. PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SECTION, J. L.
Parker, Supervisor: They would have no objection to the
vacation of the alley if an easement were to be retained for
their service.
3. PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, GAS DISTRIBUTION, Ronald R. Herrin,
Supervisor: Would have no objection to the vacation of the
alley inasmuch as they have no mains installed in the alley.
4. ENGLEWOOD UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, C. B. Carroll, Jr., Director :
Would favor the complete vacation of the alley with an easement
being retained.
5. ENGLEWOOD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, Kells Waggoner, Director:
The partial vacation of the alley (the south 150ft.) would be
objectionable because of drainage unless an extension to the
alley were to be dedicated west to South Pennsylvania Street.
Mr . Waggoner stated he would have no objection to the vacation
of the entire alley, however. The City could then be relieved
of the responsibility of providing for the run off from water
which might collect in the remaining portion of the alley, and
the responsibility placed on the property owners under 122.5-1
of the Municipal Code as new development occurs.
,. .
-------
I !
'l'
I
'
•
•
Copies of these lette rs are in the Planning Department , should you
wish to refer to them.
Next , letters wer e s e nt t o all of the adjoining p r operty owners in
t he bloc k. Swed i sh Hospital owns 150 ft . frontage on South Pennsylvania
Street, and has no ob ject ion to the vacation of the alley as long
as an easemen t i s ret a i n e d f or a water line they have in the alley,
inasmuch as the y hav e a well on this land, and are apparently running
water north t o th e Hospital . I n cidentally, the vehicles using the
alley now exit across this vacant land , and it is also the spot
where much of the storm drainage now collects.
A Mr . Mendel who owns 187 ft . fron t ing on South Pearl Street has no
obj ec t ion t o the vacation of the alley .
Only two other property owners ar e involved: Kramers, who own 50
ft. on South Pennsylvania, did not reply and are , therefore, assumed
no t to object to the vacation. Mrs. Trogstad who owns property at
3 620 South Pennsylvania is the only obj ector and her reason is that
sh e doesn 't want to carry her trash barre l to the front o f he r
pro perty for pickup.
The Planning Director recommends the vacat i on of the entire alley
with an easement to be retained for t he following reasons: (1) The
alley now dead ends at Lit t le Dry Creek and i t would not be feasible
or practical to extend it across the Little Dry Creek onto East
J efferson Avenue. (2) Because of the topography of the area, only
o ne of the properties have vehicular access onto the alley. The
one which does is adjacent to Highway 285 and is a rental unit on
the back portion of the lot which is to be tor n down. (3) Any
vehicles entering this alley have to either back out onto U.S. 285
which is not to be desired, or to exit over property owned by
Swedish Hospital. (4) It would not be possible for this alley to
be improved to a point where it could serve as a passage or public
way open to travel or to provide secondary means for vehicular access
to adjoining properties without a considerable expenditure of funds.
(5) Trash and garbage can be collected from the front of the properties.
(6) This is an area that needs to be redeveloped and the applicants
proposed development will remove at least seven older dwelling units.
(7) Were the alley to be retained and used for access to parking
at t he rear of new multi-family units, it would not be of an adequate
width to carry such traffic and it would, in my opinion , be a hazard
at its intersection with U.S. 285. (8) The storm drainage must be
provided for to the approval of the City Engineer before new building
starts, and I am of the opinion that the developers of new uses can
be required to install proper storm drainage facilities to Little
Dry Creek.
After having considered the matter on January 22, 1969, on February
19 , 1969, and upon being polled on February 20, 1969 , it was the
recommendation of the City Planning and Zoning Commission that the
alleyway in Block 6, Higgens Englewood Gardens, Arapahoe County,
Color ado , be vacated and a utility easement in lieu thereof retained.
gw
D. AND§lEWS ROMANS
Plann i ng Di r ector
'I
I • •
f
...
I
•
-
-:·:\
. -· ~{""'; ~~ .. :. i • • -. '• _, , . ,-\~, S 1'1 ... " ~' i L" .. l '1
f\"'"'V"r, ~ ,., .. r,: · · ''~:
__ I L_
___ J L -------
-
E . ..f .E.F F CP, J'/ A V £.
---l '.r,:... --i _,-5"-. -
I I
I
"'):
'( ,, . q
,---, Fs-· -•·· -v>r· -,..,
lr~
-r-z ~·--1 <.c
"'' ~
--.
I • /< I i!~
I •·
"·
------
I 4 3
--_.,.; __
'~
'~ 1 1 1),
"' ------,.._ ' ...
''ll ~ ----_,--I)
"' 3 q " I --~ --" "' ~ "l
-----~'--.
3 7 "l
.3S
4.
' ~
' ~
...j
~
"' ~
~
~
0
~
I ·1 , .·-
: Trogstad
I _ - --
1 Kram er
~
.;!
1\j
' 1 Sw e dish
I
I
1 Hqspital
'1 -' ' ~\·
,,
{
' ~
Me nd e l
et al
11 •
\3 1
----~---
!i
------
.. • ::'~:i · :
s ·;~·.r;y 1: .• 5912
1 h C'l'•''~'-7 c ~ 1 .. i -.., tha -I• .,ve S\H'v C'y e n :-n c !'l ari;.,d 6\ W~c ·~-h r ~·o v
a Part of Lo':-s 72 , 33 , O; ' • .,d Lo t !" 35 t .J ~ • .; /Jt U"le 3out:-. 7 .8 7 !'t •
L _
;-
I I
I ~ I_.
I
I I
I I
I
1: I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
l I
.,~ !J':>t ~6 , 3locic 5, .:mr! a part of Lot slB , 19, r, 20 ~"\ a1J. o! Lots l '),l 16 & 17
Bloc}· 6
1
an-i all o!' Lots 2 9 to 40 incl . Block 6 all of llhich is in H!rr,!:;iS OOL:!i.o/000
GA.1D':.Il'>, u apahoP. ~oun t~{, Colorario .
ALLEY VACATION
Kubby Re quest o
Am end d R omm e ndation •
• •
•
•
·~o"l\(c
0~ I
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CAREER SERVICE COMMIS~N
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO <~,
FEBRUARY 20 , 1969, 7:00 P .M. •o0 ,.. '() '(c;-·,(.'~
PRESENT : J . F . DeVivier, H . H. Mayer, H . R . Braun , J. F . Murphy
ALSO PRESENT : Kay Morris
THE FOLLOWING MOTIONS WERE PASSED FOR APPROVAL :
1) The minutes of the last regular meeting as printed .
,..
2) The f o llowing anniversary increase s retroactive to February 1, 1969:
NAME
SEIDL, Mary
SMITH , Sara
TITLE & DEPARTMENT
Adult Se r vices Librarian
Children's Li b rarian
GRADE &
STEP
3) The following anniversary increases effective March 1, 1969:
BEITTEL , Mary
DEVORE, Patricia
DICKENSON , Lorraine
JOHANNE S , Albert
MILLER , Jerry R .
ROBERT S , Kay
Secretary , Finance 15B
Secretary , Engineering 15C
Posting Machine Operator , Utilities 13C
Foreman , Water Distribution 22F
Maintenanceman, Street 17C
Chief Clerk 14F
4) Approval of the eligibility lists for ser geant , relief dis -
patcher, with the understanding the title on the eligibility
list be changed to correspond with that on the personnel action
of the person hired .as relief di s patcher ; and also the eligibility
lists for fireman, clerk typist , and planning aide .
5 ) The following new hires from the list of eligibles :
COLLIER , James Relief Dispatcher, Police 12A
Effective 1/17/69
CROUCH , Billy L . Fireman 19A
Effective 1/20/69
HARTUNG , Henry Fireman 19A
Effective 1/23/69
MCCOY , Patrick Fireman 19A
Effective 1/16/69
38
• •
'
•
NEW HIRES (Cont'd)
NAME
MOLL , Adrian W.
WALTERS , Delbert
WOOD , Richard A.
NI STAD , Marga ret
THO RNBURN , Thomas
•
TITLE & DEPARTMENT
Fireman
Effective 1/22/69
Fireman
Effective 1/16/69
Fireman
Effective 1/28/69
Clerk Typist , Library
Effective 2/3 /69
Planning Aide
Effective 2/12/69
4) The following promoti ons effective March 1, 1 969 :
FRAZIER , Ronald
GOETZ , C. Robe r t
Detective, Police
Sergeant, Polic e
Patrolman lst Cla ss
Detective (Temporary Assignment)
GRADE &
STEP
19A
19A
19A
12A
l6A
24F t o
25F
22F to
24F
Mr . Murphy presented the board a letter from Mr . Dial d ated
February 6 , 1969 requesting the establishment for a full time
permanent po si tion for a clerk -secretary to be shared by the
Finance and Ut ili ties Departments . Mr. Murphy stated he received
a job description a n d it would be a clerk typist position at a
Grade 12 .
IT WAS MOVED, SECONDED, AND CARRIED THAT A FULL -TIME PERMA -
NENT PO SITION OF CLERK TYPIST AT A GRADE 12 BE ESTABLISHED FOR
THE UTILITIES AND FINANCE DEPAR TMENT AND THAT THIS POSITION BE
,_
FILLED BY SUBMITT ING THE TOP THRE E NAMES OF THE CURRENT ELIGIBILITY LIST
FOR CLERK TYPIST TO THE DEPARTMENT . HEADS INVOLVED.
A letter from Mr . Kay Morris of the Parks and Recreation
Departme nt was discussed by the Board . Mr. Morri s requested re -
imbursement of sick time used because of an on -the -job injury .
The City pays for the first five days of an on -the -job injury
and then State Compensation picks up from there . The problem
is that State Compensation does not start paying until the
eighth day the employee is off work . The Board informed Mr . Morris
that they had no power to make any changes in this policy as it
was adopte d by ordinance and the City is insured by State Compensa -
tion for any claims of on-the -job injuries .
The Board requested that a letter be written to Mr . Dial
regarding the personnel actions for anniversary increases to con-
-2-39
. ,
I • •
'
•
vey to the department heads that they must indicate on the personnel
action that the employee is performing satisfactorily and is deserving
of an increase as the Board cannot make this determination .
The meeting was adjourned and the ne~t meeting is set for
March 20, 1969.
•
J . F. DEVIVIER ,
Chairman
LQ~TCWu ~
Recording Secretary
I • •
'
•
RE GULAR MEETIN G
EN GLE' . .ZOOD HATER AND SDJER BOARD -FEBRUARY 25 ,
(Postponed from February 18 , 1969)
The meeting was called to order by Chai rman Frantz at 5:15 P.M.
Members Present:
Memb ers Absent:
Oth er City
Offi c i als Present :
Brownewe ll , Frantz, Kreiling, Lay
Oliner , Ro bohm, Schwab
Utilities Dire c tor Carroll, Legal Consultant Sh i vers
Mr . Frantz, Chairman, adv i sed the Board that, for lack of a quorum at the meeting scheduled
f or Tu esday, February 18, 1969 , same had been postponed to Tuesday, February 25 , 1969 .
, .
He further advised that those members present on February 18 , 1969, Messrs . Br ownewe ll, Frantz
and Kreiling , along with Mr. Carrol l , Utiliti e s Direc tor, had rec eived the follo wing co rres -
pondence , concerning an application for En glewood water service for property known as 2100
West Oxford Avenue, outside the City limits , and discussed the matter informally with Mrs .
Ho a gland, Mr . Howard H. Hall and Mr . Alonzo c. Hall , representatives, wh o were in attendance
on February 18 , 1969 :
•
City of Englewood
Water & Sewer Department
)uOO South Ela Li
Englewood , Colorado
"Business address: 2100 Wes t Oxford Ave .
Mail Address: uu69 South Pearl St .
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Attention: Mr . Chas. B. Carroll, Uti lit~e s Director
Dear Sir:
The followin g landlords will be known as "We" in t he
delivery of th~s letter: Ibrsey Hall , Jr ., Alonzo c.
Hall , Ho ward H. Hall , Elizabeth D. Hall and Eleanor H.
Hoagland . (Formerly: Hall Sand & Gravel, Inc .)
We request the attention and consideration of the Englewo od
Wat~r Department for service at our property in Arapahoe
County. The site of this prop erty is adjacent to the City
of Engl ew ood property, east of the Platte River , south
side of West Oxford Av e . and West of Kaibab Lumber Co .,
ada: 2100 Wes t Oxford Ave . This property contains 22 acres
mo re or less .
We ~hall r e qui r e a six i nch line ~nto the proper ty and
·the City of Engle wood wa.ter main is located d~re ctly
across the hiway on the north side of Oxford Ave.
We have delayed our request for t wo weeks as we wan ted
to be quite sure of our need as we have been negot~ating
a lease of property for a concre e batch~ng pl an t . This
lease has been consumated and on the basis r>f he oresent rate~ the useage will be $90 .00 to $100 .00 per month at
the present time . Ho we ver we expec to require more
c ~tpaci ty as future developmen t Jerog resses . Also we shall
requ~re one fue hydrant at the pres en t t e.
We have talked to Mr . John Cu rtis seve ral times and f eel
we shall be able to work well with your department .
Very truly yours ,
/S/ Eleanor H. Hoagland, Represen tati ve 11
•
I • •
I !
I f
'!
-----
-•
-2 -
"CITY OF ENG LE\o.TOOD
3LOO South Elati Stree t
Englewood , Colo r ado 80110
Office Of Dir e cto r Of Utili ties
Mr s . Eleanor Hoag land
4469 South Pearl Street
Englewoo d , Co lorado 80110
Dear Mrs . Hoagland:
February 12 , 1969
Sub j ect: Request Fo r Engl ew ood Water Service
2100 West Oxfo r d Avenue
Arapahoe County
This will acknowle dge rec eipt of your recent letter , received in this
office Febru ary 6 , 1969, requesti ng a six inch wa t er tap to serve the 22 acre
i ndustrial proper ty known as 21 00 West Oxf o rd Avenue for both domestic use and
fi re protection .
Under City of Englewood regulations, since t his property i s l oc ated out-
s i de th e City limits, in Arapahoe County, it will be necessary for the owners of
such property to form a non-profit wa ter us er's association with whom the City can
enter into a distributor 's co ntract.
The r e is a 14 i nch City of Englewood water main in place in West Oxford
Av enue , adj a.cent to the su bj ect property , and there does not appear to be any
physical reason why this service could not be installed.
Althou gh thi s department l oo ks favorably upon your request , it will be
nec ~s sary that the Engl ewood ater and Sewer Board consider same and make recom-
men dati on s to Citj Council .
For your further information, un der the present schedule, the Englewo od
water main connection ch arge f or a six inch tap, outside the City limits, to serve
a 22 a c re tract, i s computed, as follows:
1st Acre - --- --- -$ 200 .00
Next 2 Acres @ $150 .00 Per Acre 300 .00
Nex t 2 Acres @ $100 .00 Per Acre 200 .00
Next 5 Acres @ $ 25 .00 Per Ac re 125 .00
Rema i ni ng 1 2 Acres @ $ 10 .00 Per Acre 120 .00
~ Acres -Inside City Charge For 2" Tap -$ 945 .00
Plus 5% 47 .25
Ins ide City Charge For 3" Tap -$ 992 .25
Plus 5% 49 .61
Inside City Charge For 4" Tap -$1,041.86
Pl us 10% 104 .19
Inside City Charge For 6" Tap -$1,146 .05
X 150%
Outside City Charge For 6" Tap $'I 27I9 .0B
Rela i ve to the actual i ns tallation , the City Water Departmen , after
receipt of copy of executed connector 's agreement a nd payment of connection
charge , will tap the main and install a six inch t a pping valve , billing the property
owner actual co st for same . All piping and appurten ances , including the wa ter meter,
from this poin t to and throughout the property are to be installed by a licensed
plumbing con r~ctor , retain ed by and at the expense of the property owner , in
accordance with City of Englewood specifications.
This rna ter will be placed on the agenda for discussion at the next regular
meeting of the Englew ood Water and Sewer Ro ard , scheduled for 5 :00 P .M., Tue sday,
Feb ru ary 18 , 1969 , Confe renc e Roo m A. Engle wo od City Hall .
You , a]ong with any other representatives i ncluding your attorney, are
i nvi t ed and ur ged to attend this meeting and participate in the discu~s io n since
there may be se veral qu e stions , by the Board and yourselves that need to be resolved,
and your attendance could greatly contribute to a more prompt conclusi on .
•
I •
f
----
•
-3 -
8 . Carroll , Jr .
Director
CBC/jc"
At that in!'o rmal
lett e r of ap plica 1on 1
Ka i bab Lum ber Mpany ,
i n the f ormation of th
a since they had wr itten the o r iginal
ssi 111 1 of joining with the owner o f the
adjacen to the Hall lands on the East,
I was their thought that the two parti es
water tap and crossing of Wes t Oxford Avenue
both parties could be served.
The ap plicants were advised at tha time that, under City regulation s (Muni cipal Code,
8,4-9), to wh ich any distr ibutor 's con tract is subject, e ach prem i ses must be served by a
separate servi ce c onnection to the main ,
The ap plicants had pointed out tha they would like to acquire Englewood water within 60
days.
The appli cants were advised, at that informal meeting, that, while official recommending
action could not be taken, the City will act favorably on the application, anL the applicants
were further advised to have their attorney contact Mr. M. 0. Shivers, Jr., Legal Consultant
for the Englewood Water and Sewer Board, for proper procedure in the formation of said water
users association and to clarify with him the legal possibilities of more than one property
being served by one service connection to the main, after which they could proceed to form
their association,
Mr. Frantz stated that the applicants had been invited to appear again at this re-scheduled
meeting ~o further discuss the matter.
The Board unanimously concurred in the advice previously given the applicant! informally and
since they were not present , Mr, Carroll was asked to write a letter to them confirming that
the Water and Sewer Board would act favorably upon their application when the required non-
profit water users association has been formed, and advising them that service from one
water tap would be only for property clearly defined in the Distributor's Contract.
The following letter, from the City of Li ttl eton, was presented:
•
February 5, 1969
"City of Littleton, Colorado
2450 West Main
Mr . Charles B. Carroll , Director of Utiliti es
Ci t y of En glewood
3400 Sou t h Elati Street
Englewood, Co l orado
Dear Mr . Carroll:
Per our recent conversati on, the City of Li ttleton plans to extend
a water main in West Chenango Avenue from South Santa Fe Drive to
s erve areas with i n Li ttleton c i ty limits, It is pos s ible this main
co uld also serve property owned by Mr. Dale Rea and located within
Englewood c i ty limits .
We wou ld like to know if the Ci ty of Englewood has any ob j ecti on
to L1tt l eton serving water to that part of Mr . Rea's property in
question. A legal description and map of same are included f or
your convenience .
. , I I
'f
I • •
'
-
Yours very truly,
/S/ Myrlon L. Gatling
Ass•t. Supt. of Water
sg
-4 -
cc : Littleton Director of Public Works
Littleton City Engineer"
•
Mr . Carroll displayed a map which showed the Dale Rea property to be located immedia tely
West of the intersection of West Chenango Avenue and South Wyandot Street, bounded on the
West by the South Platte River. Mr. Carroll pointed out that the nearest Englewood water
main is located in West Oxford Avenue approximately two blocks north of Mr. Rea's office
building.
,. -
After discussion, in which it appeared that several items of City policy needed clarification,
the matter was tabled.
The matter of Englewood sewer head tap fees, for both inside and outside City users, was
brought up for discussion.
Mr. Carroll pointed out that the outside City, residential, head tap fee of $60.00 per tap,
used in connector's agreements with new sanitation districts or associations, outside the
City, to date, had been originally established over ten years ago and recommended thatt based
on rising costs of construction of sewage treatment facilities, same be increased to $~5.00
per tap.
Mr. Carroll brought out further that the existing sewer head tap fees for indu11trial properties,
outside the City, were established by City Council on March 10, 1958, and that there are no
established rates for commercial properties outside the City except in existing specific con-
nector's agreements.
Mr. Carroll suggested that head tap fees, outside the City, be re-established, providing rates
for industrial, commercial and residential properties, now now covered in specific contracts,
And presented a proposed resolution for re-establishment of sewer head tap fees, outside the
City, incorporating a schedule of rates, on an area basis, making fees for industrial and com-
mercial properties the same, at approximately 2~ higher than the industrial rates established
i n 1958, and $85.00 per tap for residential properties.
After study of the proposed resolution, and discussion, the Board concurred in the need for
establishment of head tap fees for all catagories of users and an approximate 20% increase in
rates. They also determined that the increase should be consistant in all catagories and
agreed that the residential rate should be changed from $85.00 to $75.00 per tap.
Several other minor corrections were made in the proposed resolution, after which,
Lay moved,
Brownewell 1 seconded, That the propoaed resolution for the re-establishment of
Bnclevood sever head tap fees for industrial, commercial and
residential properties outside the City, applicable except
when other fees are in effect by specific contract, as
Ayes :
Nays :
Absent :
corrected, be recommended to City Council for immediate adoption.
Brownewell 1 Frantz, Kreiling, Lay
None
Oliner 1 Robohm, Schwab
Mr . Carroll next pointed out that City Council had established sewer head tap fees for in-
dustrial properties , on an area basis, on December 16 1 1957; and, that there are no established
seve r head tap fees for commercial properties, inside the City.
Head tap fees for residential properties, inside the City, have been computed, to date, except
for those properties within improvement districts , on each sewer main extension, as follows:
•
I •
I I
I f
'T
• II'-
-5 -
Front Foot Rate :
Construction Gost (Actual Cost of Construction) Plus
Engineering Cost (10% of Construction Cost ) Plus
Carriage and Overhead ($ .60 Per Front Foot)
Mr. Carroll suggested that the sewer head tap fees, inside the City, be re-established,
prov i di ng rates for industrial, commercial and residential properties, not now covered by
specif c contrac t or existing sewer extension assessments; and, proposed a schedule of
rates, on an area basis, for industrial and c ommercial properties which would be the same,
at approxi mately 20% h i gher than the industrial property rates established in December, 1957.
He also suggested that the residential head tap fee be computed in the same manner as at
present with a substantial increase in the carriage and overhead rate.
In discuss i on , the Board agreed t hat head tap fees shouls be establi shed for all catagories
of users and concurred in the need for an approximate 20% increase in the rates for industrial
and commercial properties.
It was felt, however, that further study is necessary before determing the proper carriage and
overhead rate and the method of applicat ion of same, particularly in the case of multi-story
buildi n3 s .
Mr. Carroll was asked to investi gate this matter further and report his findings to the Board,
as soon as possible, in order that recommendations to City Council may be made.
Mr . Carroll presented a draft connector 1 s agreement between the City of Englewood and the
•
City of Greenwood Village Sewer General Improvement ~strict No. 1, as prepared by Mr. Val
Hoyt, attorney for that district, and as changed to include the recommendations of Mr. Carroll
and members of the Board who had discussed same at the infonnal meeting on February 18 1 1969,
relative to head tap fees, term of co ntract and other language to bring the agreement more in
line with other existing connector's agreements with new districts.
In discussion, it was agreed that the term of the agreement should be for 12 years ; and, that
any expansion of the original district shall be only with written consent of the City in the
form of a numbered supplement to the connector's agreement.
It was also determined that, rather than set out specific head tap fees in the contract, to
rema i n i n effect throughout the term of the contract, the head tap fees shall be those in
effec t by resolution of the City Council, and as may be ad justed by the City from time to
time .
Mr. Carroll was asked to correct paragraph 3 of the Contract to reflect this change .
The Board also directed Mr. Carroll to change the word "waste" to "gasoline" in the fourth
line of paragraph 5.
After some further discussion ,
Lay moved,
Brownewell, seconded, That the Water and Sewer Board recommend to City Council that,
after adopti on of the Resolution re-establi shing sever head
Ayes r
Nays ;
Absent :
tap fees, outside the City limits, and upon receipt of evidence
of agresnent between the Ci ty of Greenwood Village Sever General
Improvement District No. l and South Englewood Sanitati on Distri ct
No . 1 for carriage of sewage through the line of South Englewood
Sanitati on Di s tr i c t No . 1, the Connector's Agreement between the
City of Englewood and Ci ty of Greenwood Vi llage Sewer General
Improvement District No . 1 1 as correc t ed, be approved and
executed.
Brownewe l l, Frantz, Kreili ng, Lay
None
Oliner , Robohm 1 Schwab I •
f
•
-6 -
The followin g co rrespondence relative to poss~ble annexation of McLellan Reservo i r property
to the Ci ty of Littleton, was recei ved and read:
•
"M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO : Larry Borger , City Manager
FROM: Les Jayne , Planning Director
DATE: February 7 1 1969
SUBJECT: Annexation and Zoning of the McLellan Reservoir
When the McLellan Reservoir owned by the City of Englewood is annexed
into the City of Littleton , any zoning district may be established.
Section 28 .116-B of the City Zoning Ordinance permits publi c parks
and/or playgrounds in any zoning district as a use by right.
It is suggested than an R-1 zoning district be established f o r the
following reasons:
1 . After the recreation area around the lake is developed, it may
be desirable to place a residence on that property for a caretaker
to live in.
2 . The Comprehensive Plan proposes a low density development to the
south in Douglas County. An R-1 zoning district would probably be
compatible with the proposed residential development .
An alternative is to zone the area PIP. This would require the Park Plan
to be approved by the City of Littleton as per the PIP . Also 1 as a matter
of logic , it may be desirable to have all of the area down to the County
Line zoned PIP s~nce the general area will be industrial in character .
LJ :dtU
"CITY OF LITTLETON, OOI.ORAOO
2450 West Main
February 10 , 1969
Mr. Stan Dial, City Manager
City of Eng lewood
En glewood City Hall
Engle wood , Colorado 80110
!)Jar Stan:
Attached are the recommendations of Mr . Les Jayne, the City's
Planning Di rector, regarding possible zoning for the McLellan
Reservoir site . I c oncur vi th them and wo uld be happy to an-
swer any questions that you may have regarding the procedure .
I • •
f
•
•
-7 -
You asked also for a copy of the annexation map of the property
to be includ ed in the McLellan annexation. This matter i s cur-
rently unde r study and we will not prepare the annexation and
petitions un t il we have the tabulation of the property owner-
ship and ac r eage involved . I will furnish that map to you as
soon as it is compl eted.
WB:blm
Attach."
Ve ry truly yours,
CITY OF LI TTLETON
/S/ Larry J. Borger
City Manager
II INTER-oFFICE
MEMORAN'IlJM
TO: Mr. Charles B. Carroll, Utiliti es Director DATE: February 17 1 1969
SUB J ECT: POSSIBLE ANNEXATION OF McLELLAN RESERVOIR PROPERTY TO
THE CITY OF LITTI.ETCtJ
After informal discussion with the City Council regarding Littleton's
inquiry as to our position on the possible annexation of McLellan
Reservoir lands to the City of Littleton, it was the consensus of the
Council that the valued opinion of the Water and Sewer Board would
be des irable.
Via this memorandum , I am requesting that you di scuss with t he Water
and Sewer Board the salient factors 'Which could have a bearing on the
desirability of thi s property's annexation to the City of Littleton.
It is the Co uncil's i ntention to bring to light the multitude of fac tors
wh ich will have a bearing upon the Ci ty 1 s decision to sign an annexation
petition at a l ater date.
Please have yo11r recording secretary i temize or prepare a list of all
factors whi ch the Water and Sewer Board discusses and which should
be considered in arriving at the City 's position and any recommendation
of you r Board. Please convey such information to me for transmittal to
the City Cou ncil ,
Incidentally, it is enti rely possi ble t hat the Reservoir property could be
annexed wi thout the City's consent, if the petition met all legal require -
ments and was signed by enough of the owners.
/S/ STANlEY H. DI AL
City Manager
SHD/ij"
,._
In discussion , the Board was unable to determine any real advantage to the City of Englewood,
by this annexation , except possibly police protection whi ch the City is now receiving through
the Ara pahoe County Sheriff's office; and , the preclusion of annexation to Denver .
The Board felt that the disadvantages of the annexation would be that the City of Englewood
would be subject to Littleton Bond for Con struction, Building Permit fees , License and other
fees .
I • •
,
-•
-8 -
Al so , shou d recreat1onal faci 1ties be deve o ped, Little ton co uld poss1b l y impose certain
undesir able controls on sam e ; and, should it be determined that recreation fac i lities should
no t be developed, there could be much additional pressure fe r us e for rec reational purposes
i f the property becomes a part of the City of Little ton cau s ing addit1onal expenditure of
t i me and money.
Mr. Carrol l was asked to convey the f eel1ng of the Board, a long these l ines, to Mr. Dial.
For nformation of the Board , Mr . Carroll presented all members present with a c opy of
an updated tabulation of En glewood Water Rights as of January 11 1969 , as prepared by him .
(See copy of this tabulation attached as a part of these mi nutes.)
For further i nformation of th e Board , Mr . Carroll presented all members present with a report
titled PRELIMINARY CALCULA TIONS TO SUPPORT A WATER RATE INOOASE FOR 't.'EST SLOPE EXPENSES
wh ich he had prepared .
(See co py of this report attached as a part of these minu tes.)
Mr. Carrol advised the Board that the Pur chase and Sale Agreement, for the purchase by Gates
Rubber Company of certain Mc Lell an Reservoir lands from the City of Englewood, has finally
been drawn in final form and will be delivered to the City Attorney for his final legal
appraisal before execution.
There bei ng no further business to come before the Englewood Water and Sewer Board, the
meeting wa s adjourned at 6:40 P.M.
~A?~ Curti~
Approved. ______________________________ __
• . ,
I • •
f
Date :
Sub j ect:
Recommendati on:
•
•
•
•
MEMORANIUM TO 'mE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING AC TION
OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE ENGL&.'OOD WAn:R AND SEWER BOARD
February 25, 196 9
,_
Resolution Re-establishing Englewood Sever Head Tap Fees For Industrial,
Commercial and Residential Properties Outside the City .
That the attached proposed Resolution for the re-establi shment of
Englewood sewer head tap fees for industrial, commercial and residential
properties, outside the City, applicable except when other fees are
i n effect by specific contract, be immediately adopted.
Respectfully submitted,
By: Robert F. Frantz
a rman
I • •
f
•
•
RESOLUTION ?t,, !.2/ )~ rf tf( i
WHEREAS, by action of the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado at a
recessed session, held March 10, 1958, certain sanitary sewer head tap fees for in-
dustrially zoned properties, outside the corporate limits of the City of Englewood,
Colorado, were established; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain changes are necessary to also provide
sanitary sewer head tap fees for commercially and residentially zoned properties,
outside the corporate limits of the City of Englewood, Colorado; and, to provide
additional revenue for sewage treatment plant capital improvements;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that sanitary sewer head tap fees, for taps out-
side the corporate limits of the City of Englewood, Colorado, established Karch 10,
1958, be revised, as follows:
SANITARY SEWER HEAD TAP FEES
OUTSIDE CITY
Effective April 1, 1969
AVAILABILITY: Available to users taking Englewood sewage treatment service outside
the corporate limits of the City of Englewood, Colorado.
APPLICABILITY: Applicable for industrial, commercial and residential service, except
when other fees are in effect by specific contra.ct.
SCHE!lJIE I -Sanitary Sewer Head Tap Fees For INDUSTRIAL AND CO~IMERCIAL PROPmTIES,
except those listed in SCHEDULE IIa
Rate Per Acre
Total Acreage For Connections Rates For Larger Connections
In Tract 6-Inch Or Smaller 8-Inch 10-Inch 12-Inch
1 Acre $ 215.00 t: t: > p. p. p. p.
Next 2 Acres 143.00 .... .... .... ~ ~ 0 "-"
Next 2 Acres 72.00 s-s-c+
0
0'-0> ....
Next 5 Acres )6.00 I I ? ~ H
5 ~
Next 5 Acres 18.00 ~ ~ 0
~ ::0 ~ ~ II>
All Over 15 Acres 7.00 ' c+
Ill ..
Less than one (1) acre will be prorated at $ .005 per square foot , w1 th minimum
charge, in all cases, to be $150.00 per tap.
SCHEDULE II -Sanitary Sewer Head Tap Fees For RESIIENTIAL AND O'IHER PROPERTIES
WJTH SPECIFIC USE: ------
Residential -Single Family Unit - -
Residential -Multiple Family Units
-$ 75.00 Per Tap
75.00 Per Tap For First Unit and
65.00 For Each Additional Unit
Schools - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - -75.00 Per Tap Based on Each 12
Pupils of School Capacity
Equivalent to 1 Tap
Hospitals - - - - - - --- - - - --- -75.00 Per Tap Baaed on Each 4
Beds of Hospital Capacity
Equivalent to 1 Tap
Trailer Courts - - - - - ----- - - - -75.00 Per Tap Based on Each 3
Trailer Si tea Equivalent
to 1 Tap
Churches - - - - - - - - ----- - - - -75 .00 Per Tap
Head Tap fees for all other properties not listed in SCHEIJJLE II shall be
•
I • •
•
•
Page Two
determined on an area basis in ac cordance with SCHEDULE I .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be published in the Englewood Herald
and Enterpn.se for two successive issues commenc i ng on March __ , 1969 .
Introduced and adopted by City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorad at
a session held March __ , 1969.
Mayor
ATTEST :
City Clerk
I • •
. , ' 2X
-•
0 -
DATA RELA TIVE TO Co\SH FLOW, DEPT SE RVI CE, AND EXPENDITURE S 4TTEN DitN T TO THE WEST
SLOP E PR OJ ECT
1. Assumptions :
a. 'tl est Slope expenses as proj ected by W. W. Wheeler and McCall-
Ellingson are reasonably a ccurate .
b . Population and water u ~age rates as projected by Parker & As sociates
hold reasonably t rue.
c . Non -we st slope expenditures exclusive of de bt s e r<~c e an d c ontri-
bution to General Fund increase by 8% annually .
d. No an nu al r educ tion in taps. Futur e taps to be metered based on
planned mul tiple dwelling and comm e rcial construc tion .
e . Bon ds issued in 1970 at an interest rate of ~.
2 . Exhi bits:
a . Exp en ses proj e c ted through 1976 (In cludes Bon d I ssue s and West Sl ope
0 & M co sts)
b . Water revenues through 19 75 .
c . Cas h flow summary (Bon d Il'sues A & B)
d. Transmo un t a n expen ses.
e . Ca h flow summary with 25% and 50% rate increase .
3. Co nclusi ons:
•
a . Based on estimate of a cash balance defici t some t im e during 1972,
a rate increase of 50% in 1970, for coverage of Issue A, would r e sul t
in a zero c~sh balance during 19 78, wi thout addition l scurc es of wa t er
r evenue . This approac h has problems in that the bond sal e woul d give
us no resources for expansion of treatment and t ransmission facil i ties
needed to handle the increased water availa ili y .
b . Bond Issue B ($2,10 2,000 ) woul d g ve us suff lci en money to i m r ove
our cap a ilities i n treatment an d transmission as we l l as f1 ~ance our
portion of the West Slope projec t . A 50% increase n 19 70 ould carry us
through 19 74 , but ad ditional water sales would be mandatory to mai ntain
a cash balance until th e debt service retiremen t would adjust do wnward
with the c onclusio of the curren t debt in 1984 .
c . Some offse t1ng r evenue through in ero s by i nvestment co uld be
gaine d on bond sale capi tal which was not immedi ately en cum be r ed . Ex ample :
New treatment and transmission facilities would not be a b solutely required
until summer of 1973, since storage and d rect flow through exchange of
West Sl ope wa t e r would not be put into use until th e summ er of 1973 .
This is ov er and above what exch ange s tak e place a f er const r uc tio of
Ran ch Creek-Hamilton Creek conduit . With construction of new t eatment,
,_
I • •
'
1-
•
• •
etc. facilities possibly in 1972 , we would earn us substanti al interest
from 1970 on the unencumbered reserves .
L. Re commendations:
•
a. This rough picture points ":.o raise of rates by 50% in 1970 , and
an issue of $2 ,102 ,000 to cover mu c h of our future needs . Exact construc-
tion estimates of expanded facilities is unknown at this t i me. For a
McLellan treatment plant of 12 11.0. pl .,._ pumping s tation and transmission
lines is estimated at $1 .5 to $2 .0 mi llion . Of course, if federal aid is
unavailable, t h e entire $2 ,102 ,000 would be required for direct construc-
tion expen s es at the Western Slope.
·. . ' ·' \ ! ,.
I • •
-•
0
•
Expen se s Through 1976
(Inc l udin g new bo nd i ssue and West Slope 0 & M co sts)
Assumption: I nflat i on t o increase 0 & M costs by 8% ~•uall y.
With Is su e A ($1 ,051 ,000) With Issue B ($2,10 2,000)
Op erations & Maintenance
Cur ren t de bt servi ce
Mi s cellaneo u s
1 969 Total
Operat ions & Maintenance
Current de bt service
Misce ll aneous
19 70 Tot al
Operations & Main tenance
Cur rent debt service
Added de bt , Issue A
Miscellan e ou s
197 1 Total
Op eration s & Maintenance
Cur rent deb t service
~dded deb t, I ssue A
Mis cell aneou s
West Slop e 0 & M
1972 Total
Op er ation s & Main t enance
Curren t de bt service
dd e d debt , I~su e A
Misc ellaneous
West .lope 0 & M
1973 Total
Operations & Mai ntenance
Current debt service
Added debt, Issue A
Miscellaneous
West Slope 0 & M
l97u To tal
Operations & Mai ntenance
Current de bt se r vic e
Added debt, I s sue A
Miscellaneous
West Slope 0 & M
1975 Total
•
$ 507 ,668
373 ,897
$
20 1000
90 1,56 5
$ 5U9,2 Bl
373,322
$
201000
942,603
$ 592,lu3
370 ,972
86,806
20,000
$1,669,921
$ 639,5lu
373,u72
87 ,210
?() ,ooo
109,uu
$1,229,330
(Up 13%)
$ 690,675
375,ul2
87,50 5
20,000
128,371
$1,j)l,963
(Up 5 .6%)
$ 7u 5 ,929
37 7 ,ou 2
87 ,690
20 ,000
130 ,858
$1 ,361,519
(up u .u%)
$ 805 ,6o3
373 ,362
87 ,765
20 ,000
l33 ,u 2u
$1,420,154
(Up u. 2%)
SaJne
Same
Op eration s & Maintenance
Current deb t service
Added de bt, Issue B
Mi scellaneous
1971 Total
Operat i ons & Maintenance
Current debt service
Added de bt, Issue B
Miscellaneous
West Slope 0 & M
1972 Total
Ope rations & Maintenance
Current de b t service
Added de bt, I ssue B
Miscellaneous
We st Slope 0 & M
1 973 Tot al
Ope ration s & Maintenance
Curr ent debt ser vi ce
Added debt, Is~~e B
M1.scellaneous
West Slope 0 & M
197u Total
Op erations & Maintenance
Current debt service
Added debt, Issue B
Miscellaneou s
We st Slope 0 & M
1975 To t al
EXHIBIT A
$ 592 ,lu3
370 ,972
1 71 ,610
20 ,000
$1,154,725
$ 639 ,5lu
373 ,u72
171,530
?0 ,000
1o 9,1 3u
$1,31 3,650
(Up 1 2%)
$ 690,675
375 ,ul 2
171 ,285
20 ,000
1~~~3n !r,J 11
(U p 5 .3%)
$ 7 5 ,929
377 ,ou2
171,875
20 ,00 0
130 ,858
$1 ,445 ,70 4
(up u .3%)
805 ,6o 3
373 ,362
172, 2u5
20 ,ooo
133 ,u2u
$1 ,504,634
(up u %)
I • •
·. .• \ !
I I f
'!'
•
0
•
Expenses Through 1976
(Including new bond issue and 1,vest Slope 0 & M costs)
With Issue ([1 ,051 ,000) ii ... , T S l''le P 1 ~ 2,1 ? ,000)
Op er ati0ns & Mainte nance
urrent debt s ervi c e
Added de bt , Issue A
Mis c e l laneous
West Slone 0 & M
1976 Tot al
•
$ 870 ,051
374 ,527
87 ,730
20 ,000
1 36 ,074
$ 1,488 ,38 2
(Up 4.6%)
Operations & Mainte an ce
Current debt service
hdded de ht , Issue B
Miscellaneous
We ~t Slope C & M
1976 Total
EXHIBIT A (Page 2)
870 .051
374 ,527
172 ,395
20 ,000
136,074
$ 1 ,573 ,047
(U p 4 .4%)
I • •
f
-•
• •
Water Revenues Through 1975
1. Projected average annual water consumption per capita per day l.
1970 230 G.P.C.D.
1971 233
1972 236
1973 239
1974 242
1975 244
2. Three year revenue breakdown: (including budget year 1969) 2•
1967 10,030 taps produced $653,300 which is $65 per tap, or $0 .00026/ gallon
1968 10,088 taps produced $775,076 which is $76 per tap, or $0,00027 / gallon
1969 10,400 (?) produced $750,000 which is $72 per tap, or $0.00023/ gallon
3. Future usage and revenue estimates-average annual consumption (G.P.C.D.) 3.
1970 230 gal X 365 days X $0.00025/ gal X 42,000 pop. -15% • $749,2 53
1971 233 gal X 365 days l $0.00025/ gal X 42,900 pop. -15% • $7 75 ,291
1972 236 gal X 365 days X $0.00025/ gal X 43,800 pop.-15% • $801,748
1973 239 gal X 365 days X $0.00025/ gal X 44,700 pop. -15% • $8 28,62 3
1974 242 gal X 365 days X $0.00025/ gal X 45,600 pop. -15% • $855,917
1975 244 gal X 365 days X $0.00025/ gal X 46,700 pop. -15% • $883,808
Footnotes:
•
1. Prelindnary report for water system improvements, Parker & Underwood,
September, 1965 page 2-13.
2. From office records.
3, Parker & Underwood report September, 1965, page 1-6. Reduc t ion of 15%
made to conserve revenue estimates.
EXHIB I T B
I . •
0
.• I !
I ' "
• ,_
• •
Cash Flow Summary With Bond Issues and No Rat e I ncrease
Not e: No r even ue shown from investing bond r evenue s.
Wi th Issue A ($1,051,000) With Issue B ($2,102 ,000 )
Balance as of Jan. 1, 1969 $ &x>,l02 Balance as of Jan. 1 , 1969 $ 600,102
1969 revenues 762,295 1969 revenues 762,295
1969 expenditures 901 1 565 1969 expenditures 901 1 565
$ 480,832 $ 480,832
Balance as of Jan. 1, 1970 $ 460,632 Balance as of Jan. 1, 1970 $ 460,632
1970 revenues 749,253 1970 revenues 749,253
1970 expend i tures 942 1 603 1970 expenditures 942 1 W3
$ 287,482 $ 287,482
Balance as of Jan. 1, 1971 $ 267,462 Balance as of Jan. 1, 1971 $ 267,462
1971 revenues 775,291 1971 r evenu es 775 ,291
1971 expenditures 1 1069 1 921 1971 expe nditures 1 1 154 1 725
(\-lith de bt , Issue A) $-7,148 (With debt, Issue B) $ -91,952
Balance as of Jan., 1972 $-7,146 Balance as of Jan. 1 , 1972 $ -91 ,952
1972 revenues 601,746 1972 revenues 601 ,746
1972 expenditures 1 1 229 1 3~ 1972 expenditures 1 14 221 764
(With debt, Issue A) (With debt, I ssue B)
Balance as of Jan. 1, 1973 $-434, 7~ Balance as of Jan. 1, 197 3 $-71 2,966
I· •
EXHI BI T C
. , f •
I
"
Year
1971
1972
1 97 ~
1974
1975
1976
19 77
19 78
1979
1980
1981
198 2 • 198 3
1984
1985
198 6
198 7
1988
1989
1990
1991
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
I
•
• •
ANNUAL COSTS OF TRANSMOUNTAIN ?ROJ ECT
.... c1E lt.~ ~os ts operations & Maintenance Total Annual Costs
Issue A ($1,051,000) Issue B ($2,102,000)
We st (1) Carr iage( 2) (3) (4) Anm in . (5) Total 0 & M Bo n d 0 & M Bond
Interest De bt Se rv ic e Interest Debt Service Slope Costs McLe llan Power Gen. O &M I s sue A Issue B
57 ,806 86 ,806 11 5,610 171 ,610 86 ,806 171,610
56,210 87,210 112,530 171,530 1 3,994 14,000 26,363 25,000 27,77 7 109 ,134 196,334 280 ,66 4
54,50 5 87 ;505 109 ,285 171,285 28 ,500 14,700 26 ,890 25,000 33 ,281 128 ,371 21 5,876 299,6 5
52 ,6 90 87,6 90 10 5,875 171 ,87 5 29 ,070 15 ,435 27 ,42 7 25,000 33 ,926 130,8.58 218,5:~8 )02,733
50,765 87 ,76 5 102,245 172 ,245 29,651 16 ,205 27 ,97 7 25,000 34 ,591 133 ,424 221,189 30 5,669
48,7)0 87,7 30 98,395 172 ,395 30 ,244 17,015 28,537 25 ,000 35 ,278 1 )6 ,:J74 22 3,804 )08 ,469
46,585 87 ,585 94,325 172 ,325 30,849 17 ,86 5 29 ,107 25,000 35 ,98 7 138 ,808 226 ,393 311 ,133
44 ,330 87,330 90,035 172 ,035 31 ,465 18,755 29 ,689 25,000 36,718 141 ,627 228 ,957 313 ,66 2
42,51 5 87,515 85,525 172 ,525 32 ,095 19,695 30 ,289 25 ,000 37 ,47 7 144 ,556 232 ,071 31 7,081
40, ?60 87,260 80 ,74 0 172 ,740 32,7)6 20,680 30 ,893 25,000 38 ,258 14 7,567 234 ,827 320 ,307
37 ,67 5 87,675 75,680 172 ,680 33,391 21,714 31,509 25 ,000 39 ,064 150 ,678 23 8,35 3 323,3
34 ,92 5 87,925 70,340 172,340 34 ,059 22,799 32 ,139 25 ,000 39,898 1 53 ,895 241 ,820 )26 ,23 5
32 ,010 88,010 64 ,735 172 ,735 34,740 23,939 32 ,781 25 ,000 40 ,761 157 ,221 245,231 330,6)0
28,930 87 ,930 58,795 172 ,795 35 ,434 25 ,139 33 ,435 25 ,000 41 ,652 160 ,660 248 ,590 333 ,455
25,68 5 87 ,685 52 ,525 17 2,525 36 ,142 25,641 34,103 25 ,000 42,310 163,196 250 ,881 335,7 21
22,2 75 88 ,275 45,925 172 ,925 )6 ,864 26 ,795 34 ,78 5 25 ,000 43 ,205 166 ,649 254,924 339,574
18 ,645 88 ,645 38 ,940 172,940 37 ,601 28 ,000 35 ,480 25 ,000 44 ,1 28 170,209 258 ,854 343,149
14 ,795 88 ,795 31 ,570 172 ,570 38 ,353 29,260 )6,190 25 ,000 44 ,731 173,534 262,329 .346,10 4
10,725 87 ,725 23 ,815 172 ,815 39,120 30 ,577 )6, 914 25 ,000 46,064 177 ,675 265 ,400 350,490
6,h 35 88 ,43 5 15,620 17 2,620 39 ,902 31 ,953 37 ,652 25,000 47,077 181,584 270,019 354,204
1 ,92 5 )6 ,925 6,985 133,985 40 ,700 33 ,391 38 ,405 25,000 48 ,124 185,620 222 ,545 )19,605
1964 contract called for co st s of $10 per $1,000 i nve sted . Figures reflect costs for 1/2 of capital investment . Inflation o!
2% annually based on 1964 dollars .
1964 contract c alled for $11 .82 acre foot char ge by Denver. Wheeler computed 833 acre foot a year to be charged . Infl ation of
4 .5% ann ually based on 1964 dollars.
McLel lan Reservoir and pump station maintenance and operation of $33 per $1,000 of plant value . Inflation of 2% ~~ually based
on 1964 dollars .
Power for pumping to McLellan Reservoir estimated stable at $25,000 annually.
Administrative ~d general costs computed at 35% of other West Slape operation and maintenance costs .
Q
E-<
H
ID
H
~
X
C\1
('I)
~
--'".
•
• -
• •
Ca s h Flow Summary With Bond Issues And Rate Increase I n 1970
I s sue "A" ($1 ,051 ,000) Issue "B" ($2 ,102 ,000)
I nc rease 25% Inc rease 50% I ncrease 25% Increase 50%
Balance as of Jan 1 1 1969 $ 600,102 $ 600 ,102 $ 600 ,10 2 $ 600 ,10 2
1969 Re v enu es 782 ,29 5 782 ,295 782 ,295 782 ,295
1 969 Expen ditures 901,565 901,565 901 ,565 901 ,565
Bal anc e as of J an 1, 1970 $ 480,832 $ 48o,83 2 $ 480,832 $ u8o ,83 2
1970 Revenue s 936,566 1,12),880 936 ,566 1 ,12),880
1970 Expenditures 942,603 9u2 ,6o3 9u2 ,6o3 9u2 ,6o3
Balanc e as of J an 1, 1971 $ 47 u,795 $ 66 2,119 $ u7u ,795 $ 662 ,119
1971 Revenu es 969,11 u 1,162 , 937 969 ,nu 1 ,162 ,937(Up 3.4%)
1971 Exp enditu r es 1,06 9,921 1,069 ,921 1,15u ,725 1 ,154 ,725(up 18 .u%)
Balance as of J an 1, 1972 $ 373,98 8 $ 755 ,135 $ 289 ,184 $ 670 ,331
1972 Reven ue s 1,002,185 1,202,622 1 ,00 2,185 1 ,2o2 ,622(up 3.u%)
1972 Exp enditures 1 ,22 9,33 0 1,229 ,330 1,313 ,650 1 ,313 ,650 (Up 12%)
Balance a s of J an 1 , 1973 $ 1u6 ,8uJ $ 128 ,u21 (22 ,281) $ 55 9,307
1 97 3 Revenues 1 ,010,779 1,212,935 1 ,2l2,935(Up .9%)
1 973 Expe ndi tures 1 ,301,963 1,301,963 1 ,385 ,7u3(Up 5.3%)
Bala nce as of Jan 1, 1974 (144,341) $ 639,399 $ )86 ,499
1974 Revenue s 1,283,876 1,283 ,876 (Up 5.6%)
197u Expenditures 1,)61,519 1 1 445 ,704 (Up 4.3%)
Balance as of Jan 1, 1975 $ .561, 7.56 $ 224 ,671
1975 Revenues 1,325 ,712 1,325 ,712(Up 3.2%)
1975 Expenditur es 1,420 , "'4 1 ,504 ,634(Up 4%)
Balance as of Jan 1, 197 6 $ 467 ,314 $ 45 ,749
1976 Revenu es 1,373 , 700 1 ,373 ,700(Up 4.5%)
1976 Expenditures 1 ,488 , 382 1 ,573 ,047(Up 4 .4%)
I . •
EXHIBIT E
·. , \ !
' • 'r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
REPORT
TO
..
CIT Y MANAGER
1968
--------·----'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
REPORT
TO
CITY MANAGER
1968
,. -
' I
I
-------·----'
-
I
I
I
II
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
fl
I
I
I
I
• I
~
•
0
•
DEPARTMENT OF POLICE
Englewood , Colorado
ANNUAL REPORT
1968
•
Re port prepared by,
R. L. Morgan, Lieutenant
Commanding Pa trol Division
Data supplied by ,
Patrol Divis ion
Investigative Division
Adm inistrative Division
. 1
I • •
I
I
I
I
•
Stanley H. Di al
Ci ty Manager
City of Englewood
Englewood, Colorado 8D110
Dear Sir:
•
0
•
The year 1968 wiT 1 be long remembered in the files and history of
the Englewood Police Department. The Cinderella City grand opening brought
together law enforcement people from throughout Colorado and for the first
time, on such a lar ge scale, involved businessmen, service organizations,
and law enforcement in one of the most extensive mutual endeavors ever to
occur in our city or state.
Probably one of the most extensive criminal investigations ever to
be conducted by the Englewood Police Department occured with the strangu-
lation death of one of our community's teenage girls. The invest i gation
of the death of Connie Paris continues at this time.
A major accomplishment was made with the new police pay program.
Englewood's Police Department will be in a much better position of retain-
ing highly qualified personnel and in recruiting the best possible appli-cant.
Our Community and Public Relations Program has moved forward and
received significant support from local businessmen and the school adminis-
trat ion. Englewood is privileged in not having any serious problem, so
far, with narcotics and drugs in our schools.
Our crime and accident picture is included in this report. With
increased activity, more business and traffic, we find the incidents of
crime and traffic accidents on the incline. Some additional personnel
are programmed for 1969. Every effort wi 11 have to be made to insure
that maximum patrol effort be accomplished. Planning is underway toward
a recommendati on to supplement the time spent by patrol officers on
errands and miscellaneous other tasks.
The need for a new facility is ever increasing and is of priority
concern for the immediate future.
Our police tra i ni ng has continued with obvious benefit through
improved performance . Additional programming and plann i ng is currently
under way to i mprove pol i ce training through the use of video t ape s nnd
other techn i que s .
·' I !
'!'
I • •
f
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
0
•
At the present time, our radio commun i cat ions sy s tem is being
improved to some extent. Relocation of transmitter equ i pment and
emergen cy stand by frequencies are being installed. The department's
other equipment has been continually improved, result i ng in better
performance.
Respectfully subm i tted,
~~~ol;"
I • •
I !
I
'r
I
I
I
•
•
0 -
PO LIC E BRUTA LITY
(A letter to the poJi e depa rtment of a large ci ty i n Texas by the wife of a min ister.)
Dear s·rs:
One of the most common phrase s heard in our society and our city oday is
"pol ice brutality ." Perhaps I don't under s tand the mea ning, but I wou ld
like to give you one mother 's v i ewpo i nt on this s ubj e ct.
To beg i n, I s hould f irst t ell you that I have two teen-age sons, and
be i ng a mother I c annot help but want the very be st of everything for
them. I am a "typical mother" i n that 1 don't wan t to see them hurt by
anyone. I am not a t yp ica l mother, for I s ee things many moth er s never
hear of, much less become involved in, becau s e my husband is a mini ster
and we see the very be s t and the sordid worst.
I would like yo u to be~ wi th my s ons. Is th a t a sur prise ?
If you find them s peed i ng i n a car, PLEASE BE BRUTAL. 1 have s at at the
ho s pita l hold i ng a gr i e vin g mother's hand becau se of s omeone 's mis take.
That was brutal . I have gone wi th my husband to tell a wife her hus ban d
was ki l le~at was brutal. I have helped nurse a beaut i f ul teen-age
gi rl crippled i n a w r e~hat was bruta l . 1 have played organ music
at f unera 1 s ervice s f or bab i e s, teen~, and adults becau s e saneone
dro ve too fa st. That wa s ~·
If you shou l d c at c h my unde r -age sons with liquor in the ir posse ssion,
PLEASE BE BRUTAL. I have at all night by my hus band 's si de trying to
help piece togethe r t wo under-age young men 's lives , both br oken by
d rinkin g. That wa s b rut a l . I have lis te ned to the hor rors exper i en c ed
by anothe r man w~ile~s drunk and heard h m recall the many jails he
had served i me in for this . That wa s~· I hav e helped feed hun gry
ch i ldren be c au s e a drunken f athe r didn't come home. Th a t was bru tal.
I ha ve tried to c onsole a mother wh ose daughter wa s kil led after-being
struck by a d ru nken driver. That was~·
If you s hou ld fi d my so s wi th drugs in he ir po s e ss i o , PLEASE BE
BRUTAL . have -i ed to help rehabil i tate a woma n j ust out of pri son
for shoot 'ng her husband wh i le she wa s drugged . That was b rut al.
I hav s een a hand ~ome young man t urn into a n old ugly one~se of
drugs . That wa s brutal. 1 have s een a young ~other who wa s add ic ted
to a drug c ream arnr-;=ave for lack of a "fix." at wa s~·
If you f i nd my sons committi g any k i nd of i mmoral act or c a rryi ng any
pornograph ic mater i al , PLEAS[ BE~· J have listened to the sad c ry
of a young g 'rl who was pr egnant but not marr i ed . Th a t wa s brutal .
have been present when a boy and girl broke the new s to the i ~nts
that they had to marry . That wa s bruta l. I have tr i ed to comfort a
mother whose beaut iful daughter was-crimi nal ly ra ped . Th a t wa s~·
-1-
I • •
\ r
'!'
-
•
•
•
•
0
•
I have seen a prom1s1ng young man with a brilliant future have to give
it up and too young assume the responsibil i ties of a wife and baby.
That was~·
If you ever see my sons taking something that isn't theirs or willfully
destroying property, PLEASE BE BRUTAL. I have walked into a hushed,
sacred church that was stripped of everything that could be sold. That
was brutal. I have seen a lovely expensive home and yard completely torn~ vandals. That was~· I have wiped a little boy's tears
and helped him hunt for his stolen bicycle. That was~·
If you should ever catch my sons doing anything illegal, PLEASE BE BRUTAL.
I have come to realize that your kind of "brutality" cannot in any way
compare with the brutality that comes from breaking our laws. My husband
and I have tried to teach our sons that their rights end where someone
else's begin. We believe they have learned this lesson, but in any case
they forget, we look to you and others who influence their lives--
teachers, coaches, etc. --to see that they reme.nber. And if you must be
brutal to remind them -THEN PLEASE, BE BRUTAL. I do not want my two sons
to grow into two grown-up boys. I want them to become men, able to assume
their places i n this world and make a good contribution to it. I s i ncerely
hope they won't need your help, but if they do, and if you must THEN BE BRUTAL.
-2 -
I • •
,
•
·-
.... --
...,.
I .....
I
-
• •
•
-
I
A <*II i ni stra ti ve Di v •
S g t. L. K. Lee
1
Records and
Identifica tion
I
Training
I
Property and
Supply
I
Office Pe rsonnel
Cle r ical & Ra dio
----
ENGllWOOO POL ICE DE PA RTMENT
1968 S TAF FING PLA N
Ch i ef o f Po l ice
J ack L. C 1 as by
J
Ass i stant Chief
Clyde Hall
I
I
Personnel
l
Detective Div .
Lt. J. L. Sm ith
J
Juve nile
Division
I --
I
Pa trol Di v .
Lt . R. L . Morgan
I I • •
Patrol and
Traff ic Enf o r c em e n t
I
Accident
I nves t i ga ti o n
1
Parking
Enf o rceme nt
"
-
I
I
•
•
0
•
1968 TRAINING
The training function in 1968 provided rec r uit training, in service seminars,
and outside educat i on to a large number of regular police officers.
The recruit training academy furnished six newly appointed officers with
over 160 hours of basic instruction. Officer-instructors provided an additional
three to six month individual instruction. Over ninety percent of the training
was accomplished by utilizing Englewood police officers as instructors, both in
and out of the academy. Further training was provided by the Colorado law
Enforcement Training Academy.
Emphasis fo r i n service training is based on the fact that law enforcement
procedures, of necessity, are changing from day to day. New training equipment
provided to the police department will help us meet the day to day demand for
getting information to operational personnel. Court decisions, procedure changes,
policy determinations, new legislation, and crime indice s are i mportant to a
police officer's funct i on. The new training dev ices allow the training officer
to prepare instruction materi al for immediate use by s hift commanders at roll-
call training. Rapid release of information to operating units is becoming more
necessary to accomplishing the total police objective.
College education for police officers was formally recogn i zed in the
President's Crime Canmission report, "The Police", and has subsequently been
expanded. Congress has authorized the expenditure of 6.5 million dollars during
the 68-69 fiscal year for loans and grants to students in the law enforcement
field. Several of the Englewood officers who have been attending colleges in
the metro area can now receive financial aid. A long range program is being
developed which will recogn i ze the increased efficiency of officers withi n
these programs.
1969 training p ro gr am s wi ll be built around the needs of ind ivi duals and
groups so that the to ta l police funct i on continues to assume a more profes si onal
product.
-4-
\ !
'T
I • •
I
•
•
-
WEBB SPEAKS TO ROOKIE 'COP'
Actor Jack Webb probably is as well qua lifi ed as anybody to describe a
policeman. For 20 years, off and on, he has written, directed, produced and
starred in the Dragnet radio and TV series about policemen. The series has
never been excelled and seldom equalled in portraying policemen in an honest,
straightforward, de-glamorized manner.
Recently, in a Dragnet '67 episode, Webb delivered a 4-minute, 20-second
monologue, "What Is a Cop?", which has been acclaimed all over the country.
The Los Angeles Police Academy is using a film of Webb making the speech for
training purposes. Three u. s. congressmen from California, who apparently
pay no attention to what each other says on the floor of the House, read the
speech into the Congressional Record.
"What Is a Cop?" was written by Webb and Richard L. Breen. On the show,
Webb, in his role as Sgt. Joe Friday, laid it out to a rookie policeman this way:
"lfiAT IS A COP?"
" You're a 'cop,' a 'flatfoot,' a 'bull,' a 'dick,' 'John Law,'
you're 1 the fuz,' 'the heat,' ••• you're poison, you're trouble, you're bad news.
"They call you everything, but never a policeman. It's not much of a
life unless you like working Saturdays, Sundays, holidays ••• at a
job that doesn't pay overtime. Oh, the pay is adequate. If you count your
pennies, you can put your kid through college. But you'd better plan on
seeing Europe on your TV set •••
"You'll rub elbows with all the elite: pimps, addicts, thieves, blns,
winos, girls who can't keep a ol address and men who don't care . Liars, cheats,
con men, the class of Skid Row.
"And the heartbreak: Und e rfed kids, beaten kids, molested kids, crying
kids, homeless kids, hit-and-run kids, broken -arm kids, broken-leg kids,
broken-head kids, sick kids, dying kids, dead kids.
"The old people that nobody w.nts, the reliefers, the pensioners, the
ones who walk the street cold and those who tried to keep warm and died in a
three-dollar room with a unvented ~s heater. You'll walk the beat and pick up the pieces.
"Do you have real adventure in your soul? You'd better have. You' 11
do time in a prowl car. It'll be a thrill-a-minute when you get an 'unknown
trouble' call and hit a back yard at two in the morning, never knowing who
you'll meet ••• a kid with a knife ••• a pill-head with a gun, or two
ex-cons with nothing to lose.
-5-
\ (
'T
I • •
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
• ...
0
•
"And you 'll ha ve plenty of time to think . You'l l draw duty in a 'lonely
car' •• with nobody to talk to but your radio . Four years in unifonm and
you'll have the ab ility, the experience and maybe the desire to be a detect ive.
"If you like to fly by the seat of your pants, this is where you belong.
"For every crime that's committed, you've got millions of suspects to
choose from. Most of the time you'll have few facts and a lot of hunches.
You'll run down leads that dead-end on you ••
"You'll talk to people who saw it happen, but really didn't. People who
insist they did it, but really didn't. People who don't remember , those who
try to forget. Those who tell the truth, those who lie.
"You'll run the files until your eyes ache. And paperwork ••• you'll
fill out a report when you're right, you'll fi 11 out a report when you're
wrong, you'll fill out one when you're not sure •.•• you'll make out a report
on the reports you've made.
"You 1 11 write enough words in your 1 i fetime t o stock a 1 i brary. You 1 11
learn to live with doubt, anxiety, frustration, court decisions that tend to
hinder rather than help you: Dorado, Morse, Escobedo, Cahan.
"You'll learn to live with the District Attorney, testifying in court,
defense attorneys, prosecuting attorneys, judges, juries, witnesses.
"And sometimes you won't be happy with the outcane. But there's also
this ••• being a policeman is an endless, glamorless, thankless job that
must be done. I know it, too. And I 1m damned glad to be one of them."
*The above was taken from an article written by Bob Tweedell of the Denver Post.
-6-
. ' . ,
I • •
· . '
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
J
J
'
•
1968
NAME
Jack L. Clasby
Clyde Hall
Robert L. Morgan
J. Lonnie Smith
Orville D. Wallace
Robert E. Penney
Alvin R. Garfunkle
Kenneth L. Leff
Loren K. Lee
Edwin F. McCasland
George E. Mason
Leon V. Mull
Ronald D. Frazier
Leslie A. Crow
Phil Carpenter
Glen J. Benson
Russell E. Lowrey
Victor N. Bonomi
Doran L. Gray
Charles H. Carpenter
Donnell R. Stanton
Bobby G. Urban
Duane R. Jarred
Charles R. Riddle
Ke ith M. Miller
Clarence R. Goetz
Dale E. Claws on
Earl L. Becker
Ro bert I . Ba iley
Ronald E. Peters
Ronald G. Medford
Wi 11 i am G. Be 1 t
Glen D. Channel
J . Larry Leydon
Douglas L. Martin
Eddie Wi 1 son
Grady Brackeen
Gary Cham be rs
Michael Schaffer
Jera 1 d Vaughn
Randa 11 Carson
•
• -
POSITION
Ch i ef
Ass 't. Chief
Li eutenant
Lieutenant
Sergeant
Sergeant
Sergeant
Sergeant
Sergeant
Detective
Detective
Detective
Detective
Detective
Detective
Patrolman
Patrolman
Patrolman
Patrolman
Patrolman
Patrolman
Patrolman
Patrolman
Patrolman
Patrolman
Patrolman
Patrolman
Patrolman
Patrolman
Patr olman
Patrolman
Pa trolman
Patrolman
Patrolman
Pa trolm an
Patr olm an
Patr olman
Patrolman
Patrolman
Patrolma n
Patrolman
-7-
POLICE DEPARTMENT PER SO NNEL
STARTING DATE
12 -7-64
10-6-54
1-2-54
5-21 -56
lD-6-54
1-23-56
2-1-58
8-1-60
9-16-60
3-5-57
3-9-59
6-2-59
5-9-60
8-16-61
1-8-62
8-30-54
1-10-55
1-1-57
1-1-57
2-1-58
7-16-58
1-1-59
6-1-59
3-16-60
2-17 -61
1-2-63
8-1-63
9 -2 1-6 4
4-12-65
9 -1-65
1-17-66
11 -1-66
11-1-66
5-4-67
7-1-6 7
10-1-67
2-16 -68
2-16-68
2-16-68
2-16-68
6-17-68
I • •
-
I
1968
I NAME
I Ralph T. Allen
Donald Mclennan
Donald G. lien
I Robert Hall
Max E. Denney
I lucille Winch
Dorothy Gl i em
I Bettie Salz
Eleanor Zimmerman
I James R. Collier
I
Robert Manchego
I
I
I
I
I
I
• I
I
I
,
•
•
0
•
POLICE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL
POSITION
Pat r olman
Patrolman
Patrolman
Patrolman
Dog Warden
Parking Enforcement Maid
Parking Enforcement Ma i d
Clerk Dispatcher
Intermed i ate Clerk Stene
Oi spa tche r
Cu s tod i an
-8-
STARTING DATE
8-15-68
10-1 -68
10-15 -68
12 -1-68
4-16 -64
4-16-63
9-9-63
1-21-65
5-4-65
6-7-68
1-3 -66
0 '
I • •
. , ·· ' r ! I
'!'
,
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
·. •
'·
1968 CHANGES IN POLICE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL DURING THE YEAR
Present for duty January l, 1968
Separated
Recruited
Pol ice
Civi 1 ian
Total
Pol ice
Ci vi 1i an
Tota 1
Authorized strength December 31, 1968
Present for duty December 31, 1968
-9-
47
4
0
4
8
0
8
52
52
I • •
.• I !
I
'!'
• -
• •
(,
I
I
I ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
1968 Estimated Population 38,360
I Square Miles 6.19
Miles of Streets 114.04
Intersections 741
I 1966 1967 1968
II Tota 1 Dis~atched Calls 11,516 11,326 12,185
Hours of Overtime 1,19~ 1,850 3,403
I Hours of Sick Leave 1,639 1,259 1,856
Police Vehicles
I Police Cars equipped with
2-way radios 9 10 11
I Solo Motorcycle 1 1 1 Scooters 2 2 2 Dog Truck 1 1 1
I Vehicle Service
Total miles traveled by
I police vehicles 304,978 345,383 370,884
Total gallons of gas used 34,098 38,009 40,906
I Vehicle Information
Pol ice vehtcles involved I in accidents 8 9 17
Total amount of damage
I to police vehicles $707.00 $1,080.00 $4,503.00
• I
I
• I I • •
I
I -10-
.• I I • I I ' '! •
......
•
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
0 ..
1%8 FIREARMS FACILITIES AND TRAINING REPORT
Small arms training in the Englewood Poli ce Department was started last
year with the rebuilding of the Mclellan Dam Police Firing Range. The bodies
from two unused Civil Defense trucks were removed from their resting places at
the Water Filter Plant and transported to the range site. This was accomplished
with the compliments of the Colorado Air National Guard unit a Lowry Air Base
and facilitated by the use of a twenty-ton crane and three of their operators.
Also assisting were two men from the Englewood Water Department with their
trucks. The AT&SF Railroad donated a number of ties to be used as foundations
for the truck bodies. This gives us a reasonably safe place to store some of
the equipment such as target butts, barricades, targets, expended ammunition,
etc.
The Arapahoe County Sheriff's Office and Arapahoe County Highway Depart-
ment moved in heavy equipment and regraded . the range proper, building a much
hi gher and safer bank at the end of the range which is used as a backstop.
Aspha lt strips were put down at various different yardages to accomodate
the firing stations of the Practical Police Pistol Course and a 100 yard
station for rifle fire.
This had just been completed at a cost of approximately $3,SOO.OO to
$4,000.00 to the City, County and Federal Governments in time for our annual
Student Government Day presentation. This annual program is given to
exemplify to the students the fire power and methods of training used by our
department. As always it seemed that the demonstration of tear gas and the
machine gun were most impressive to those in attendance. This program was
for the benefit of both students and meMbers of various civic organizations
of Englewood. Several persons were given an opportunity to fire the machine
gun under close supervision and proved to be a real climax of the day for
them.
Actua l firearms training began with good weather and everyone being
quite rusty from l ack of practice. With about six hours of training per man
for the year we progressed from a medium group of shooters to a top group of
marksmen which the City of Englewood can we ll be proud of •
The follow in g wil l show the status of the men of this department and
their advancements in the firearms training program this past yeara
-11-
·.I
.• I !
~
I • •
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
• •
THE MARKSMAN QUALIFICATION GROUP
Brackeen, Grady
Carpenter, Phi 1
Clawson, Dale
Garfunkle, Al
Goetz, C. Robert
Jarred, Duane
Lee, Loren K.
Leydon, J. Larry
Mart i n, Doug
Mason, George
Miller, Keith
Peters, Ronald
Riddle, C. R.
Urban, Bobby
Wallace, Orv il le
Wilson, Eddie
THE SHARPSHOOTER QUALIFICATION GROUP
Bailey, Robert
Benson, Glen
Bonomi, Victor
Chambers, Gary
Frazier, Ronald
Gray, Doran
Leff, Kenneth
Lowrey, Russell
Mull, Leon
THE EXPERT QUALIFICATION GROUP
Becker, Ear 1
Be 1 t, Wi 11 i am
Carson, Randall
Penney, Robert
For the coming year it is planned to have special classes or training
periods for those men who may need such to improve their shooting qualifi-
cations to a point desired by this department. Also, it is planned to
inaugurate a shotgun familiarization program.
This year will also see the Englewood Police Department represented by
a team in several state pistol matches; with great hopes of br i nging home
to Englewood the trophies of our endeavors,
-12-
I • •
·.
·.I
-
I
I
I
I
•
•
0
•
1968 SAFETY AND PUBLIC RELATIONS
The Englewood Pol ice safety-education office, created to assist in the
accomplishment of i mmediate and long range community goals, benefits both
the police and publ i c. Law and order, a safe community, and effective law
enforcement rely on citizen understanding and support.
.. -
Firs t ly, formal means were required whereby the police department could
help educate the public to a better understanding of police and citizen roles
required in maintaining order and surpressing crime. Secondly, rapidly
changing laws and police procedures require up-to-date, continu?us training
for police officers.
The initial phase of the program began three years ago. The safety
officer developed programs on bicycle, pedestrian, traffic and home safety
for presentation to elementary school children. Routine schedules resulted
in each local school being visited several times each year. Lectures and
films were presented to classes and at assemblies. Bicycles were repaired
and licensed. Results of the three years indicate a greatly improved attitude
of these younger children toward law enforcement and safety.
Lectures gi ven to church groups, private clubs, and parent organizations
have been well received. Topics of discussion include ways in which the
citizen can be effective in maintaining community order, assisting in criminal
apprehensions, and securing his personal safety. Self-defense, first a i d,
criminal observation, driving safety, and narcotic control are typical
discussions. The opportunity to involve citizens in law enforcement processes
has had an effect in greater understanding and improved attitudes toward
police problem s.
Tools are needed for accomplishing these objectives. A better method of
presentation results from the use of overhead project ion and prepared trans-
parencies. A series of som e ten or twelve transparencies can be prepared,
emphasizing any idea wanted, at very little cost. For example, the pol ice
instructor may wish to show the dangers of narcotic use . Transparencie s can
be prepared showing causes and effects of its use, what it looks like, how
it's used, and so on. From experience, notes and prepared material, the
lecturer and audience proceed on a more interesting and coherent learning
experience. Several pre-made s erie s of transparencies, catalogued according
to subject, pr ovi de the instructor with a complete library for immediate use
in any one su bject.
Further programs will be developed towards spec ial problems confronting
the bu si ne ss community. Shoplifting is one such problem. By presentation
of transparency material to store employees, we expect to better prepare them
to recognize and com bat this type of theft. Correct observation of criminal
acts is d i ff icult and requir e s a trained eye to correctly report what
occured, descriptions of suspects, etc.
-13-
I 0 •
.• \ I
I f
'f
-
•
•
•
·, •
The transparency method of presenting up-to-date mater i al to po lice
officers will be ad va ntageous. Change s in laws, procedu res, and di rectives
can read i ly be transferred to transparencies and immediately d iscussed
during roll call trainin g. Lengthy subjects can be presented in serials
requiring ten minutes prior to each shift and continuing over several
meetings. The already pr epared material will as si st shift sergeants in
eliminating communication difficulties.
This year, increased emphasis is being given to the development of
programs suitable for presentation at junior and senior high levels. Our
intention is to develop several new series including, causes of driver
error in accidents, effects of driving a car while intoxicated or under
the influence of drugs, causes of and moods acquired while using any of
the several, so called, harmless pills, behavior patterns which lead to
alcohol use and abuse, and several others.
Other than exposing these young citizens to problems and decisions
they must make, prior to their experience with them, we hope to build a
better understanding of the police function. Since law enforcement is
only "touched on" in some areas of existing c iri cula, we feel that the
graduating senior is inadequate in his understand i ng of this funct i on.
It would be possible for the police function to be offered as a basic
course of instruction to senior high students, and we are in the process
of developing this, now, in conjunction with local schools.
-14-
I • •
• ,_
-
0
•
II
'I
1968 CRIMINAL OFFENSES
I
CLEARED
NUMBER OF TOTAL BY I OFFENSE ACTUAL OFFENSES CLEARED BY ARREST JUVENILES
1967 1968 1967 1968 1967 1968
11 Murder
Manslaughter
I Rape by Force 4 2 3 Ass au 1 t to Rape 1 1 . 1
I Armed Robbery 15 14 9 3 Strong Arm Robbery 2 3
II Assault
Gun 5 3 Knife, etc. 3 7 3 4
Other Dangerous Weapon 1 3 1 1 I Aggravated Assault 4 7 5 4 1 2 Non-aggravated Assault 18 31 12 15 4 3
I Burglary
Forcible Entry 144 204 34 48 11 30 Unlawful Entry 67 119 15 16 5 10
·-Attempted 1 17 1 5 1 4
Larceny over $50 .00 220 306 44 47 11 14 Larceny under $50.00 >':620 ,~814 234 233 145 149 I Bikes ,~187 '~321
Auto Theft 110 182 42 52 25 29 I Arson and Attempt 5 3 4 3
Drunk 33 33 33 33
Malicious Mischi ef ~ 460 28 ~ 24 __ll_
TOTAL 1629 2212 470 500 232 273
''<Please note that of the 620 offenses for larceny under sso.oo for 1967; 187 of I • • these offenses were stolen bicycles.
I *Please note that of the 814 offenses for larceny under $50.00 for 1968; 321 of
these offenses were stolen bicycles.
I
-15-
. . t •
-
1968
OFFENSE
Stolen Property
Vandal f sm
Weapons -poss. etc.
Sex Offenses
Narcotics
I Offenses aS!inst famf 1~1 etc.
I
I
TOTALS
I
•
J
•
• ,_
0
•
PERSONS ARRESTED -PERSONS CHARGED
ARRESTED OR QUESTIONED PERSONS CHARGED
ADULT JUVENILE ADULT JUVENILE
1967 1968 1967 1§68 1967 1968 1967 1968
1 I+
b tl4 41 3 4 1
2 1 1 9
4 9 1 3 7 2
2 3 1 7 1
2 1
353 367 794 712 300 316 84 40
-16-
.• I ! ,.
I· •
• -
• •
II
I
1968
I TO TAL CITATION S I S SUE D 1966
I 6, 781
I
MUNICIPAL COU RT 6, 362
I Reckl e ss Driv i ng 30
Carele s s Dr ivi ng 347
All Ot he r Mov i ng 1,533
I Park in g 4,013
Impr oper Equ i pment 17
Other 292
I COUNTY COURT .ill.
l Drunk Dri ving 70
Re ckle ss Dr i ving 20
Careless Dr i ving 56
Improper Equipment 12
Other Moving 83
licens e Vi ol at ions 116
Other State Violations 208
I
CR IMI NAL CASE S FILED
COUNTY
Ad ul s 33
J uv e ni 1 e s 0
DIS TR I CT
Ad ul s 8
Ju veni 1 e s 56
I
-1 7-
•
CITATIONS ISSUED
1967
6,57 4
6,065
29
303
1,143
4,243
11
252
509
104
38
78
13
95
51
347
8
0
22
84
1968
6,889
6, 393
57
357
1, 582
4,138
8
286
496
70
17
17
2
22
38
409
48
0
4
38
I
\ !
'r
I • •
f
• -
0
•
I
I
TR AFFIC AC CI DENT SUMMAR Y
I Non-Fatal
All Fata 1 Injury Pr operty
I TYPE OF AC CI DENTS Ac ci de t s Acc i dents Accidents Damage
1966 196 7 196 8 1966 196 7 1968 196 6 1967 1968 1966 1967 1968
I Ra off Roadway 8 3 46 0 0 0 3 1 10 s 2 37
Pedestrian 19 21 16 0 1 0 13 13 14 3 0 2
Mtr, Veh. in Tr affi c 651 853 1084 0 0 1 15 1 171 195 500 6 8 5 873 I Parked Motor Veh. 120 224 282 0 0 0 26 20 1 7 94 203 287
Fixed Object s 42 8 1 52 1 0 0 15 25 10 2 7 60 44
Moter Veh.-Train 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
B ic ~cl i st 13 13 14 0 1 0 1 ~ 6 11 1 ~ 3
TOTAL 85~ 1196 1424 2 221 2~6 257 6~0 9~4 1246
EXTENT & NUMBER I OF PERSONS INJURED TOTAL *8 *''<C *'''*D
1966 196 7 1968 1966 1967 1968 1966 1967 1968 1966 126Z 1968
I Ran off Roadway 5 1 12 2 1 5 1 0 3 2 0 4
Pedestrian 19 20 14 8 9 9 6 10 5 5 11 0
I Mtr. Veh. i Traff i c 244 283 314 55 62 67 67 91 93 90 130 154
Parked Motor Veh. 29 19 18 9 10 8 11 9 6 9 0 4
Fi xed Objects 30 30 17 6 14 8 8 11 7 16 5 2
B i c~c li st 13 7 11 5 2 5 5 2 5 3 0 1
I TOTA L ~40 360 386 85 98 102 98 126 119 125 146 165
I *8 -Se ve r e **C -Moderate ***D - Minor
I COMP ARATIVE TOTAL S 1966 196 7 1968
I Acci de nts 853 11 96 1494
Injur y Acci de nts 222 236 258
Fata liti e s 1 2 1 I • Pr oper t y Damage $22 5 ,218.50 $302,934.00 $460 ,3 31.00 • •
I
I
-18-
. ' I I • ...... '!'
• -•.
• •
1968 TRAFF IC ACCIDENT SUMM ARY
SE X OF DRIVER 1966 1967 1968
Ma l e 949 1281 12 95 Female 420 _m_ 706
Total 1369 1956 2001
RE SIDENCE OF DRIV ER 1966 1967 1968
local Res i dence 739 922 908
Res i d in g elsewhere in state 606 979 1044
Non-r e si dent 24 _.22 ~
Tot al 1369 19 56 200 1
ROAD SURFACE COND ITI ON S 1966 196 7 1968
Dry 695 91 1 11 70 Wet 65 96 163 Snowy or Icy -21 ..1.§1 161
Tot a 1 853 1196 1494
I . •
-19-
. , ·. ·' \ !
0 ' • or
•
0
•
I
I
~ 1968 TR AFFI C ACCI DENT SUMMA RY
TIME AND DA Y OF MOTOR VEHI CL E ACCIDENT
~ lUE S. WED. ~ f.!!.!..:. SAT. SUN. TOTALS
Mi dn i ght to 12:59 A.M. 1 2 2 0 9 6 11 31
1:00 A.M. to 1:59 A.M. 0 0 0 0 1 5 9 15
2:00A.M. to 2:59A.M. 1 1 2 4 3 6 14 31 l:OO A.M. to l:59 A.M. 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4
:00 A.M. to :59 A.M. 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 4 l:OO A.M. to g:59 A.M. 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 3
:00 A.M. to :59 A.M. 3 2 § 2 2 2 0 14
h:OO A.M. to ~:59 A.M. 9 12 9 :z 2 0 ga
:00 A.M. to :59 A.M. 10 1 ~ 12 6 5 2 4
9:00 A.M. to 9:59 A.M. 8 5 8 8 6 5 46
10:00 A.M. to 10:59 A.M. 12 10 8 § 1~ 21
16
66
11:00 A.M. to 11 :59 A.M. 18 15 14 l2 96
12:00 Noon to 12:59 P.M. 9 14 13 12 7 14 11 Bo
1:00 P.M. to 1:59 P.M. 16 11 ~ 7 11 19 12 83
2:00 P.M. to 2:59 P.M. 11 11 10 14 16 1~ 84
a :OO P.M. to z :59 P.M. 23 28 21 24 30 20 154
: 00 P.M. to :59 P.M. 31 22 22 24 20 27 12 1t8 ll 00 P.M. to t: 59 P.M. 24 24 25 26 28 24 10 1 1
:00 P.M. to :59 P.M. 6 11 16 9 22 1§ 6 85
~:00 P.H. to ~:59 P.M. 9 11 5 8 9 5 55
:00 P.M. to :59 P.M. 12 6 6 7 18 9 5 63
9 :00 P.M. to 9:59 P.M. 7 8 5 8 20 10 7 6e 10:00 P.M. to 10 :59 P.M. 5 5 3 4 t 4 4 3
11:00P.H. to11 :59P.M. 5 2 2 2 4 2 21
No t S tated 1 5 2 3 3 1 4 19
TOTAL S 221 221 191 187 276 237 159 1494
I
I . .
-2 0-
--------------~------------~c ~
. ' ' \ !
I f • '!
• -
0
•
1968 LOCATION OF ACC IDENTS
AT OR NEAR INTER SECTI ON TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS
1966 196 7 1968
Acc i dent s occur in g i n a lleys 4 8 8
Counter Report s 19 42 39
Private property Not recorded 79 165
Acoma & Amher st 0 0 I
Acana & Bate s 3 1 0
Acana & Be llevi ew 6 9 6
Acana & Corn el l 0 0 I
Acoma & Dartmouth 2 3 3
Acana & Eastma n 3 4 4
Acoma & Floyd 11 4 5
Acoma & Gir ard 5 9 7
Acoma & Gr and 1 2 2
Acoma & Hampden 5 7 0
Acoma & Kenyon 1 3 0 ,
Acoma & Leh i gh 0 I 0
Acoma & Mansfield 0 0 3
Acoma & Nassau 0 0 1
Acoma & Oxford I 1 1
Acoma & Pr in ceton I 2 1
Acoma & Qu incy 2 0 1
[ Acom a & Radcliff I 1 0
Acoma & Stanford 0 I 0
Acoma & Tufts 1 0 0
Acana & Un ion 3 4 5
Acoma & Yale 0 1 1
Ba nnock & Amher s t I 0 3
Bannock & Bates 3 1 3
Bannock & Chenango 1 0 0
Bannock & Cornell 1 6 0
Bamock & Da rtmout h 4 7 3
Bann oc k & Eas t ma n 1 2 2
Ban nock & G" r a rd 6 8 6
Bannock & Hampde n 7 7 9
Bannock & Hi ghway 70 13 14 14
Bannock & Jefferson 3 I 5
Ban noc k & Kenyon 3 3 6 I Ban nock & Layton 0 0 1 • • Bannock & Leh i gh 0 2 5
Bannock & Man sfi eld 5 8 4
Bannock & Na ssau 1 0 I
-2 1-
. ' ·' \ !
•
•
0
•
I
-it 1968 LOCATION OF ACCIDEN TS
I AT OR NEAR INTERSECTION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS
1966 1967 1968
Bannock & Oxford 4 5 18
Bann ock & Princeton 2 1 2
Bannock & Quincy 5 9 8
Bannock & Radcliff 0 1 2
Bannock & Stanford 2 0 2
l Bannock & Tufts 0 1 3
Bannock & Union 0 2 1
Bannock & Yale 1 0 2
Bates Pkwy. & Amhe rst 0 0
Broadway & Amherst 1 4 6
Broadway & Bates 15 21 18
Broadway & Belleview 23 33 38
Broadway & Centennial 8 5 6 , Broadway & Chenango 8 21 23
Broadway & ~ornell 5 8 1
Broadway & Dartmouth 25 26 24
Broadway & Eastman 10 18 10
Broadway & Floyd 24 20 22
Broadway & Girard 15 26 23
Broadway & Grand 3 9 7
Broadway & Hi111pden 24 28 33
Broadway & Jeffers on 3 6 9
Broadway & Ke nyon 13 9 18
Broadway & Layton 2 2 5
Broadway & Lehigh 1 3 4
Broadway & Lehow 13 20 11
Broadway & Mansfield 10 7 13
Broadway & Nassau 7 7 4
Broadway & Oxford 18 22 38
Broadway & Powers 1 0 0
Broadway & Princeton 4 7 5
Broadway & Quincy 8 22 28
Broadway & Radcliff 11 6 1 7
Broadway & Rafferty 3 10 11
Broadway & Stanford 2 8 12
Broadway & Tufts 2 3 5 I Broadway & Union 5 7 5 • • Broadway & Yale 6 4 9
Broadway -5400 blk. South 0 0 2
-22-
·' \ ! •
• ,_
0 -
n
Jl
-~
1968 LOCATION OF ACCIDENT S
~ AT OR NEAR INTER SECTION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS
fl 1966 1967 1968
Chenango Circle & Chenango 0 0
] Cherokee & Bates 0 1 0
Cherokee & Chenango 0 2 0
~ Cherokee & Cherokee Cr. 0 1 0
Cherokee & Cornell 0 0 1
Cherokee & Da r tmouth 0 1 0
Cherokee & Floyd 0 2 2
Cherokee & Girard 0 1 0
Cherokee & Hampden 4 5 12
Che r okee & Jefferson 2 2 0
Che rokee & Kenyon 1 2 2
Che rokee & Layton 1 0 0
Che rokee & Leh i gh 1 0 1
Che ro kee & Man s field 1 1 1
Cherokee & Nassau 0 1 0
Cherokee & Oxford 0 1 0
Cherokee & Pr i nceton 2 1 1
Che rokee & Qu i ncy 2 0 1
Che rokee & Radcliff 2 1 1
Che rokee & Stanford 1 5 8
Cher okee & Tuft s 1 0
Cl ark son & Amherst p 1. 0 0 1
Cl arks on & Be l levi ew 3 3 4
Clarkson & Chenango 1 0 1
Cl arkson & Da r tm outh 2 2 2
Cla rkson & Ea stma n 0 0 1
Cl ar k ~on & Fl oyd 2 5 6
Cl a rkson & Gir a rd 2 1 3
Cl a rkson & Hamp den 1 4 2
Cl arkson & Hi ghwa y 70 3 3 4
Cl a rk s on & J e ff e rson 1 3 1
Cla rkson & Layt o n 0 0 1
Cla rks on & Man s fi e ld 0 1 3
Cl a rkson & Na ss au 1 0 0
Clark son & Oxford 2 0 1
Cl a rk s on & Pr i nceton 0 0 1 I Clarks on & Rad c 1i ff 1 0 0 • • Cl a rk son & S tanford 1 2 1
Cl a rk s on & Tuft s 1 0 0
Clarks on & Un ion 0 1 0
-23-
.• ' I • I
'r
r -•
0 -
,_ • -
0
·. •
f
1968 LOCATION OF ACCIDENTS
AT OR NEAR INTERSECTION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCIDEN TS
~ 1967 1968
Downing & Eastman 0 2 1
Downing & Floyd 3 5 4
Downing & Girard 2 0 4
Downing & Hampden 7 3 13
Downing & Highway 70 5 7 9
Downing & Jefferson 0 1 0
Downing & Yale 2 0 1
Eastman Cr. & Floyd 0 2 0
E 1 ati & Amherst 0 1 0
El ati & Belleview 4 1 0
Elati & Chenango 1 2 1
E lati & Cornell 1 1 1
Elati & Dartmouth 0 0 1
Elati & Eastman 1 0 0
E 1a ti & Floyd 0 0 1
E 1 ati & Girard 0 0 1
E la ti & Grand 0 2 2
E lati & Highway 70 11 9 21
Elati & Kenyon 0 0 1
Elati & Layton 0 0 1
E 1 a ti & Lehigh 0 1 1
E 1 ati & Mansfield 0 0 1
Elati & Oxford 0 1 1
Elati & Princeton 0 3 3
E lati & Quincy 1 0 1
E 1 ati & Radcliff 0 0 1
E la ti & Stanford 0 1 0
E 1 ati & Tufts 0 1 0
El ati & Union 0 1 1
Emerson & Cornell 1 0 0
Emerson & Dartmouth 0 2 3
Emerson & Eastman 0 1 1
Emerson & Floyd 0 1 0
Emerson & Girard 1 0 0
Emerson & Hampden 1 1 8 I Emerson & Highway 70 1 1 0 • •
Feder a 1 & Belleview 7 6 3
Federal & Bellewood Dr. 0 1 1
-25-
·. \ r ' . '
•
0
•
1968 LOCATION OF ACCIDENTS
AT OR NEAR INTERSECTION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS
~ 1967 1968
Federal & Chenango 0 1
Federal & Monmouth 0 1
Federal & Pimlico 1 0 0
Federal & Radel iff 1 0 0
Federal & Stanford 0 1 3
Federal & Tanforan 0 0 1
Federal & Tufts 0 0 3
Federal & Union 0 2 2
[ Fox & Bates 0 0 2
Fox & Bellevi ew 0 0 1
[
Fox & Chenango 1 0 1
Fox & Dartmouth 2 3 2
Fox & Eastman 0 1 0
Fox & Floyd 1 0 0
ID
Fox & Highway 70 2 5 8
Fox & It hi ca 1 2 0
Fox & Kenyon 1 3 0
ru
Fox & Layton 1 0 0
Fox & Lehi gn 0 1 0
Fox & Mansfield 0 1 0
Fox & Oxford 0 3 2
[ Fox & Princeton 1 1 1
Fox & Quincy 0 1 0
Fox & Radel iff 1 1 0
~ Fox & Stan ford 1 0 1
Fox & Tufts 1 0 1
Fox & Union 1 1
Franklin & Dartmouth 1 0 0
Franklin & Eastman 0 1 0
Galapago & Eastman 0 1 1
Galapag o & Floyd 1 1 0
Galapago & Grand 1 1 1
Galapago & Highway 70 1 4 9
Ga 1 apago & Ithica 0 0 1
Galapago & Jefferson 0 0 1
Galapago & Kenyon 0 1 1 I Galapago & Layton 0 1 0 • •
Galapago & Mansfield 0 1 1
Galapago & Oxford 1 0 1
I Galapago & Princeton 1 0 0
II -26-
\ !
' '!
•
0
•
1968 LOCATION OF ACC I DEN TS
AT OR NEAR I NTERSECTION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCIDENT S
~ 196 7 1968
Galapago & Qu i nc y 0 1
Galapago & Radcliff 1 2 2
Galapago & Tuft s 0 0 1
Galapago & Union 1 0 0
l Gay! ord & Ea s tman 0 0
Grant & Amher s t 0 1 0
l Grant & Bates 0 2 0
Gran t & Be l levi ew 1 0 0
Grant & Be l lewo o d Or. 1 0 1
Gra nt & Chenang o 0 1 2
Grant & Cor ne l l 0 0 3
Gran t & Dar t mou t h 0 2 0
Gran t & Ea s tman 0 1 1
Gra nt & Gi rard 0 2 2 • Grant & Hampden 1 2 2
Grant & Layton 0 1 1
Gran t & Lehigh 0 0 1
Grant & Mansf i eld 0 1 0
Gran t & Princeton 0 1 0
Grant & Qu i ncy 1 2 0 ll Grant & Rade l i ff 0 0 1
Grant & Tuf ts 1 0 0
Gran t & Ya l e 0 0 I
u Grov e & Be lleview 0 0
Ha wt horne & Un i on 0 0
High & Fl o yd 0 0
Ho o ker & Bell e vi ew 1 0 0
Ho oke r & Be ll ew oo d Dr. 0 1 0
Humb oldt & Floyd 1 0 0
Humb ol dt & Ea s tman 0 1 0
Hu ron & Be l levi ew 2 0 1 I Hu ron & Chenan go 1 2 1 • • Hur on & Dartm outh 1 2 0
II -2 7-
•' \ !
I
,
• 'r
•
0 -
1968 LOCATION OF ACCI DENTS
AT OR NEAR INTERSECTION TOTAL NUM BER OF ACC ID ENTS
1966 1967 196 8
Hur on & Flo yd 1 1 0 Hur o n & Hi ghw ay 70 4 1 4 Hur on & Kenyo n 0 0 1 Hur on & Lehigh 1 0 0 Huron & Mansfi e l d 0 1 0 Hu ron & Na ssau Way 0 1 0 Huron & Qu i ncy 0 4 1 Huron & Radel iff 0 1 0 Huron & Stanford 1 1 4 Huron & Tufts 0 3 3 Huron & Union 1 0 0
Inc a & Be ll e vi ew 2 1 2 In c a & Hampden 0 0 11 In c a & Layt on 1 1 1 Inca & Lehigh 1 0 1 Inca & Man s f i eld 1 0 0 Inca & Oxford 1 0 3 Inca & Stanford 1 3 1 Inca & Tufts 0 1 1
Inca Or . & Wh i take r Or . 0 0 ll Irving & Belleview 1 2 0 Irvi ng & Chenango 0 0 1
L Ir vi ng & Grand 1 1 0 Irvi ng & Mon mo uth 0 1 1 I r vi n g & Pi m 1 i co 0 1 0
II I rvi ng & Sa r ato ga 1 1 0 Irving & Tu fts 1 1 () Irvi n g & Union 0 0 1
n Jason & High way 70 6 4 7 Jason & Kenyon 0 2 1 Jason & Layton 0 2 0 Jason & Lehigh 1 1 3 Jason & Mansfield 3 1 2 J a son & Oxford 3 1 0 Jason & Quincy 2 1 0 I I Jason & Stanford 2 1 1 • • • Jason & Tufts 0 2 1
II
II
-2 8 -
' . \ ( f . ...... 'I' •
• ,_
0
•
I
J ,
1968 LOCATION OF ACCIDENTS
AT OR NEAR INTERSECT! ON TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS
r 1966 196 7 1968
Kalamath & Chenango 0 0 1
Ka lamath & Lehigh 0 0 1
r Kalamath & Mansfield 0 1 0
Kalamath & Nassau 0 1 2
Kalamath & Oxford 1 1 1
[ Kalamath & Princeton 1 0 0
Ka 1 amath & S tan ford 1 0 2
Kal amath & Tufts 2 0 2
u Kalamath Dr. & Whitaker Dr. 0
Keen land Ct. & Belleview 0 0
La f ayette & Floyd 0 1 0
Lafayette & Girard 0 0 1
Lafayette & Hampden 0 1 3
Lincoln & Amherst 1 2 0
Lincoln & Bates 1 0 2
Li ncoln & Chenango 1 0 0
Lincoln & Cornell 0 1 0
Lincoln & Dartmouth 6 2 3
L
Lincoln & Eastman 0 2 2
Lincoln & Floyd 3 1 3
Li nc ol n & Girard 2 4 2
Lineal n & Hampden 0 4 s
Li nc o ln & Highway 70 2 1 6
Li nco ln & Kenyon 1 2 2
Lincoln & Lehigh 2 0 2
Lincoln & Mansfield 0 1 1
Lincoln & Nassau 0 1 3
Lincoln & Oxford 0 1 1
Lincoln & Pr inceton 1 0 0
Lincoln & Quincy 2 4 1
Lincoln & Radcliff 0 0 1
Lincoln & Stanford 0 1 2
Lincoln & Tufts 0 0 1
Lincoln & Ya le 1 0 0
Linden Ct. & Belleview 0 I • • Lipan Dr. & Chenango 0 0
.• I !
' 'T
. , •
• -
0 -
If
If
1 1968 LOCATION OF ACCIDENTS
AT OR NEAR INTERSECTION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS
m
1966 1967 1968
Lipan & Hi ghway 70 1 0 0
I
Lipan & 0Kford 1 1 0
Lipan & Quincy 0 0 1
Lipan & Tufts 1 0 0
Lipan Ct. & Stanford 0 0
Logan & Amher st 0 0 1
~ Logan & Bates 2 4 1
Logan & Bellev iew s 3 0
Logan & Chenango 1 3 1
Logan & Cornell 2 2 s
Logan & Dartmouth s 10 3
Logan & Eastman 2 0 1
Logan & Floyd 7 1 s
Logan & Gi rard 9 4 21
Logan & Grand 0 0 1
Logan & Hampden 3 7 1 s
Logan & Highway 70 16 23 25
Logan & Jefferson 3 1 2
Logan & Kenyon 2 3 2
Logan & Layton 1 0 4
Logan & Lehigh 3 9 7
Logan & Mansfield 1 4 7
Logan & Nassau 3 3 2
Logan & Oxford 3 3 2
Logan & Pennwood Cr. 0 2 0
Logan & Pr i nceton 1 4 3
Logan & Quincy 3 3 7
Logan & Radc 1i ff 1 0 1
Logan & S tanfor d 2 1 2
Logan & Tufts 1 2 3
Logan & Un ion 0 0 1
Logan & Yale 1 4 6
Lowell & Bel l e vi ew 1 1
Lowell & Monmouth 0 0 I • • Marion & Da rtmouth 0 0 1
Mar ion & Floyd 0 0 1
Ma rion & Girard 0 0 1
Mar i on & Hampden 1 1 4
-30-
·' \ /
I f • '!
,._ • -
0 -
If
If
If 1968 LOCATION OF ACCIDENTS
\[ AT OR NEAR INTERSECTION TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS
r 1966 .!.2ti 1968
Marion & Highway 70 2 0
[
Marion & Layton 0 0
Mariposa & Mansfield 1 0 0
Mariposa & Tufts 0 1 1
0 Navajo & Quincy 0 0
Ogden & Bates 1 3 2
Ogden & Cornell 1 1 0
Ogden & Dartmouth 0 0 1
Ogden & Eastman 0 1 0
Ogden & Floyd 0 1 0
Ogden & Hampden 0 2 2
Ogden & Highway 70 0 2 0
Pearl & Bates 1 3 0
Pearl & Dartmouth 0 0 1
Pearl & Floyd 0 0 2
Pearl & Girard 0 1 0
Pearl & Hampden 1 2 1
Pearl & Highway 70 0 1 0
Pear 1 & Jefferson 1 0 0
Pearl & Mansfield 2 1 1
Pearl & Nassau 1 1 0
Pearl & Princeton 1 1 0
Pearl & Quincy 2 0 0
Pearl & Union 0 1 0
Pecos & Tufts 0 0
Penn & Amherst 0 1 1
Penn & Bates 0 0 2
Penn & Cornell 0 1 3
Penn & Dartmouth 0 0 3
Penn & Floyd 0 2 1
Penn & Girard 0 0 1 I Penn & Grand 0 0 2 • • Penn & Hampden 4 5 4
Penn & Highway 70 0 2 6
Penn & Layton 0 1 0
Penn & Mansfield 0 3 2
-31-
f •
-
II
II
r
r
•
1968
AT OR NEAR INTERSECTION
Penn & Nassau
Penn & Oxford
Penn & Princeton
Penn & Quincy
Penn & Radel iff
Penn & Stanford
Penn & Tufts
Pennwood Cr. & Belleview
Pennwood Cr. & Bellewood Dr.
Platte River Dr. & Dartmouth
Platte River Dr. & Union
Race & Dartmouth
Race & Floyd
Raritan & W. Caspian Pl.
Raritan & Evans
Raritan & Iliff
Raritan & Yale
Santa Fe & Bates
Santa Fe & Dartmouth
Santa Fe & Floyd
Santa Fe & Highway 70
Santa Fe & Oxford
Santa Fe & Tufts
Santa Fe & Union
Santa Fe & Yale
Santa Fe Lane & Lehigh
Sherman & Amherst
Sherman & Bates
Sherman & Bel l evi ew
Sherman & Chenango
Sherman & Cornell
Sherman & Dartmouth
Sherman & Eastman
Sherman & F 1 oyd
Sherman & Girard
•
0 -
-32-
LOCATION OF ACCIDENTS
TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
2
35
0
0
0
2
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
5
1
0
2
1
0
0
2
0
2
1
0
5
45
0
0
2
6
12
2
3
0
2
1
2
1
0
1
2
1968
2
0
2
1
1
0
0
4
0
0
5
0
1
0
54
3
8
4
5
7
0
0
2
1
2
0
1
3
0
1
5
,_
I • •
f
•
0
•
II
II
l 1968 LOCATION OF AC CI DENTS
AT OR NEAR I NTERSECTI ON TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCIDENT S
1966 1967 1968
Sherman & Hampden 3 4 2
S herman & Hi ghway 70 1 2 5
S herman & Kenyon 2 1 5
S herman & layton 1 1 2
Sherman & lehigh 1 0 2
S herman & Mansfield 0 0 4
S herman & Na ssau 0 2 0
S herman & Oxford 0 1 0
Sherman & Princeton 0 2 1
Sherman & Qu i ncy 3 1 2
Sherman & Radcliff 1 7 3
S herman & Stanford 0 1 0
Sherman & Union 0 0 3
S hoshone & Dartmouth 0 0
Stanford Dr. & Stanford 0
Tejon & Amher s t 0 0 1
Tejon & Adriat i c 1 0 0
Tejon & Bate s 0 0 1
Tejon & Balt ic 0 0 1
Tejon & College 1 0 1
Tejon & Corne 11 2 2 0
Tejon & Dartmouth 1 0 2
Tejon & Evan s 3 3 1
Tejon & Iliff 1 3 3
Tejon & Wa rren 0 0 1
Tejon & We sl ey 0 0 1
Umat i lla & Ad riatic 0 0 1
Um a till a & Cornell 2 3 0
Uma ti 11 a & Wa rren 0 0 1
u i v t>rsity & Dartmout h 3 5 1
Univer sity & Flora Pl. 3 0 0
University & Floyd 3 0 0
Vallejo & Evans 0 3 I • •
Va 11 ej o & Il iff 0 0
Vallejo & Wa rren 0 1
-33-
•
•
0 -
I
l 1968 LOCATION OF ACCI DENTS
AT OR NEAR INTERSECTI ON TOTAL NUM BER OF ACCI DENTS
1966 1967 1968
Vine & Dar tmouth 0 1 0
Vi ne & Ea stma n 0 0 1
Washington & Amherst P l . 2 0 0
Washin g ton & Bates 1 0 0
Washington & Dartmouth 2 2 0
Washington & Eastman 1 0 0
Washington & Floyd 1 0 0
Washington & Girard 1 0 0
Washington & Mansfield 0 1 0
Washington & Oxford 1 0 1
Washington & Quincy 0 1 1
Wash i ngton & Radcliff 0 2 · 0
Washington & Stanford 0 1 0
Washington & Tufts 0 0 1
Wi 11 iams & Dartmout h 0 0
York & Eastman 0
Zuni & Bates 1 1 0
Zuni & Cornell 1 1 1
Zuni & Da rtmouth 0 0 1
Zuni & Evans 3 1 0
Zuni & Floyd 0 1 1
Zuni & Hillside 0 0 1
Zun i & Va ss ar 0 0 1
Zuni & Water 0 0 1
I • •
-34-
f •
-
•
•
-
MEMORANDUM
TO: Stanley H. Dial, City Manager
FROM: Stephen A. Lyon, Director of Finance
DATE: January 16, 1969
SUBJECT: Reapportionment of City Council Districts for the
November 5, 1969, Municipal Election
The Englewood Election Commission met on January 15, 1969, t o
discuss reapportionment of City Council Districts. Rather th an
provide a set of minutes and the detailed information which was
presented to the Election Commission, I am providing this memo-
randum which seta forth the thinking of the Election Commission
concerning reapportionment of the City and its recommendation.
The City Charter does not require that redistricting of the city
take place prior to early 1971 nor does the City Charter require
that the vote taken at a national election be used to determine
City Council Districts. However, the city Charter does require
that variances between the number of registered voters in the
smallest district and the highest district not be greater than
15% and that the redistricting be accomplished six months prior
to the date of the municipal election.
There are a number of reasons why the Election Commission feels
that redistricting prior to the 1969 municipal election is
necessary.
1. Based upon the 1968 National election the variance be -
tween the number of registered voters in the smallest district
and the highest district is 34.6%. In fact the variance between
the smallest and next to the smallest district is 17.2%. Both
of the above exceed the 15% variance established as the maximum
by the City Charter. (The above calculations are based upon
votes cast in the 1968 National election. If the votes cast
in the 1967 municipal election were used, the variance would be
even greater.)
2. Three Arapahoe county Precincts are split by City of
Englewood district boundaries. As Arapahoe County furnishes the
City with registration lists for eacl1 municipal election, this
split will result in confusion to the judges of election at best
and at worse might enable a person to vote twice in the election.
3. The recent decisions of the United States Supreme court
extend the one-man, one-vote principle to City Councils. For
this reason alone, redistricting is necessary: and because of the
,._
I
f
•
....
Stanley H. Dial, City Manager
Page 2
January 16 , 1969
•
-
one-man, one-vote principle the Election Commission f e els that
the City would be negligent to ignore the vote c ast in the 1968
National election in determining City Council District lines.
Attached hereto is a map setting forth the present City Council
District boundaries and the proposed boundaries. Below is a
tabulation of the number of regis tered voters contained within
each proposed district and the variation be t ween the smallest
district, District III, and all other City Council Districts.
PROPOSED CITY COUN CIL DISTRICTS
-
District Number Numb er of Voters % Great •r than District III
I 3,183 2.9%
II 3,384 9.4%
III 3,093 -o-
IV 3,104 .3%
Number of voters shifted to new Districts: 2,153.
In preparing the recommended reapportionment, the following items
were taken into consideration:
1. The vote cast in the 1968 National election would be
used as the basis for reapportionment.
2. The variance between the smallest and largest districts
would not be allowed to e xceed 15%.
3. The variance between districts would be as small as
possible while meeting the other considerations.
4. The proposed district boundaries would co i ncide with
County Precinct boundaries in order that no County precinct be
separated by an Englewood City Council District.
5. No incumbent City Councilman elected from a distri ct
would b e c aus ed to lose his seat upon th e Council prior to the
expiration of his term by the shifting of the area in which h e
resides from his present City council Distric t to a new district.
According to S ection ~8 of the City Charter, if a City Councilman
should become a non-resident of the district from which he was
elected during the term of his office, his position becomes vacant.
After d iscussion with Mr. Criswell, City Attorn e y, it is his
conclusion that should a councilman's residence shift to a new
district from reapportionment the Councilman wo uld lose his seat
on the effective date of the reapportionment. Reapportionment
does not effect councilmen elected at large.
" -
·' \ !
!
• 0
'
-
·.
•
Stanley H. Dial, Ci t y Manager
Page 3
January 16 , 1969
•
-
6. As l o w a n umber of voters would be shifted to a n e w
City council District as possible.
Following the above guidelines there is onl y on e other al te rnative
method of redistricting the City to that which is recomm e nded . This
alternative involves an 11.2% variance between tha smallest district
and the largest district and shifts approximately 2,535 vot e rs
to new City Council Districts.
The Election Commission recommends that the new City Co unc i l
Districts as set forth on the attached map b e a dopted b y o r d inance
by the C i.ty c oun cil f o r the lq6 9 g e n eral mu nicipa l elec tion.
According to the City Charter, the ord inance a d opting the r ecomm ended
boundaries must be effective prior to May 4, 196 9 , wh i ch i s s ix
months before the next municipal e lec tion.
mmb
Attachment
4-L_c?r-4
Steph n A. Ly on ,}:1!!'-
Director of Finance
cc Englewood Election commission
I • •
·'
"'
• I ./
I
';'..... '~L f~; a· •r~t I r
, . lil :-
~;:>:
• ')_I' -~-
• I. l:
J",.. ·1 ~ :~· · 1 r L' rcl
8~~ .. oc>r~ •ro'Tl Di :,t . l
;:o r-i ~·. 1
r · : :· c:n D i --' . '2
.... 0 !.,); .... :
;,.J -;:.arE= ~:!"0 :-:1 Di st . .3
4 ::v'L~' l
~-:1~ ~~-c~s f rom 0 ~3~
~c ::.:.s~. 3
.... ·· · ~~ ~· s:-:: f t: cd : :! , l:, 3
r·-.· I J • I
I
\ ·l:
-......... ·::
-· .:1 ...
I
_...;·--v1
:~:.:.~-E.\/,:_\'.' r-\':::
r-
I __ I
I
' •I
.......... ,.
,. -
\.. )
l I .·j
I
I
I
I
<,
v)i
I
I
I_
-· _r
r ··-·--.
PRL SCNT AND
COU NCIL DIST RI CT
...
'~
~:-
·-· -1 .
__ _I
i L ·.
'·'~t pt I t 1.'1L ,·,
! I
[_;
PROP OS ED
BOUND ARIES
1////////) ....
•
'"
_p_R ESENT. -
_.
PRESEN T DIST RIC7S NO VOT ES %Gq T~ .
'-;},0.' . ·' ~ 3 150 17.2
G.ST,1.iCT 2687
3~09
351 6
PRO PO SES C!S
-BOUNDA~.E:S
.=·s -
1777] AREAS PLACE D I~ ILLLJ NEW DIST R I CS
0
~~I
;.;..6
"
-_ ....
•
/
•
I
I A.D.,
•
cl )-r o
Co~~
./!,'Vet C' 1 ''··.~,o§z
C' 0 ttqif ~'o C' (!tit <-'~J:J.-ou'Vc, .; , ' ~'V.,.
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT ~ ( 09
-~ly 111~ ·-G(~~'i'vG
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of Januar~P~ ;~~!::
1969, by and between the City of Englewood, a municipal corporation of the Q,
State of Colorado, organized and existing under Article XX of the Constitution of
the state of Colorado, hereinafter denominated as Seller , and The Gates Rubber
Company, a Colorado corporation, hereinafter denominated as Buyer,
WITNESSETH:
1. For and in consideration of the sum of Two Thousand Five Hundred
and No/100 Dollars ($2, 500, 00) delivered by Buyer to Seller, Seller agrees to sell
and Buyer agrees to purchase, pursuant to Part IV, Section 63, of the Charter of
Seller, the property designated as Tracts A and Bon attached Exhibit 1, which is
hereby made a part of this agreement as though fully set forth herein. The
boundaries of Tracts A and B, as shown on Exhibi t 1, are approximate and shall
be established by survey as hereinafter provided,
2. At time of closing, Buyer agrees to pay to Seller, as purchase price
of said property, Five Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($5, 000, 00) per acre for
Tract A and Three Thousand Eight Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($3, 800,00) per
acre for Tract B, of which purchase price the amount paid at the signing of this
agreement shall be a part.
3, Seller and Buyer shall equally divide the expense of a p e rimeter sur-
vey of each tract to determine their acreage areas and for the purpo se of ascer-
taining the total purchase price of the property, as well as the proper metes and
bounds description by which the property shall be conveyed to Buye r.
4. Seller shall furnish Buyer, at Seller's option and expense, within
twenty-five (25) days subsequent to the date of this agreement, an abstract of title
to said property, certified to date or a title insurance policy as evidenced by a
title commitment in an amount equal to the purchase price , Title shall be good
and merchantable in the Seller, Subject to payment or tender as above provided
and compliance with other terms and conditions hereunder by Buyer, Seller shall
execute and deliver a good and sufficient General Warranty Deed to Buyer on or
before March 1, 1969, or by mutual agreement at an earlier date, conveying said
property free and clear of all liens and encumbrances.
5. Seller shall convey to Buyer a right-of-way for road purposes over a
strip of ground approximately sl.xty feet (60'), or less, ln width, as determined
.• \ !
'!'
I • •
'
•
•
•
' I
•
by survey, along and adjacent to the Highline Canal beginning on the south at
State Highway No. 31 and ending on the north at Tract B, with the following con-
ditions:
(a) Seller may use any roadway built by Buyer.
(b) Buyer will bear the full cost of the survey of said right-
of-way.
(c) Buyer will pay $3,800 per acre for the area included in
the right-of-way agreement.
(d) Buyer will be limited in the use of any roadway built
over the right-of-way to use as a private road by the
owner or owners or any part thereof, their heirs,
successors or assigns for their licensees, invitees,
and visitors.
(e) The Seller reserves the right to limit the right-of-
way to a width which does not encroach upon the free-
board water level.
6. The hour and place of closing shall be designated by agreement be-
tween Seller and Buyer. Possession of premises shall be delivered to Buyer as
of date of closing.
7. In the event a merchantable title be not shown by said abstract or title
commi tment and written notice of defects is given to Seller within the time he r e in
provided for delivery of Deed, and title shall not be rendered merchantable within
one hundred twenty (120) days after such written notice, then this agreement, at
Buyer's option, shall be void and of no effect, and each party hereto shall be re-
leased from all obligations under this agreement and the consideration paid for
this agreement by the Buyer shall be refunded to it.
8. This instrument co~taina the entire agreement between the parties
and no variation or alteration of th e terms he r eof shall be binding upon eithe r
Selle r or Buyer, unl e ss the same shall be r e du c ed to writing and exe cute d by
an author ized repre s entative of Selle r and Buyer; and this agreement shall inure to
the benefit of, and shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of Buy e r.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement
in duplicate on the day and year first above written.
-2-
\ !
!
I • •
•
,
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
By ____ ~~~----------~~~---Mayor SELLER
ATTEST:
/
Clerk of the City of Englewood, Colorado
THE GATES RUBBER COMPANY
By--------------------~~~----BUYER
ATTEST:
Aaaiatant Secretary
I . .
-3-
• •
-
•
•
MEMBERS ABSENT: Rhodus
OTHER OFFICIAlS PRESE&'l': Beryl A. Wallace, Chief Building Inspector
Urban Land Improvement c~o~·~----------------
3601 south Delaware
case No. 69-lA
The applicant withdrew his application at the January meeting as it
was incorrectly filed. The applicant is requesting a variance in the
front yard setback and to permit parking along JeffeEson Avenue and
Kenyon Avenue.
At the January meeting Mr. and Mrs. Bruce Newland, owners of the
property at 3632 south Delaware were present at the meeting to protest
the variance in the front setback.
The Recording Secretary was directed to write a letter to the Planning
Director asking tentative plans for setbaCks in the multi-femily z ones.
The property has been properly reposted and readvertised for Public
Hearing for tonite's meeting.
Mr. Ray Ludwig stated the parking plan 'has been approved :by the Planning
COIIIIIlission. The complex consists of five buildings with court yards
and open spaces between them. The buildings will be three stories in
height and contain 66 apartment units.
The following correspondance from the Planning commission was received
and read for the record.
Chief Building Inspector Wallace January 27, 1969
Mr. Ray Ludwig and Mr. Robert Anderson attended the last meeting of
the C~ty Planning and zoning commission to request the approval of
the off-street parking plans for the apartment complex which is to be
built in the 3600 block of South Delaware.
Director of Public works Waggoner had notified the commission previously
that he has approved the curb cuts to the parking off of west Jtenyon
Avenue and west Jefferson Avenue, and that there are no drainage problems.
With this in mind, and after having reviewed the plana with Mr. Ludwig
and Mr. Anderson, the Commission voted unanimously to accept the parking
lay-out as submitted for this apartment complex, and asked that you be
ao notified.
/s/ D. AndreWs Romane,
Planning Director
_, \ ! • I
'f
I . •
0
f 32xl
•
•
Mrs. Schneider February 5, 1969
RE: SETBACI<S FOR APARTMENTS IN R-3-B and R-3-A ZONES
The Planning Department is indeed in the process of revising the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map, hopefully to the end of
making it a more practical, flexible, and neoteric instrument wbich
will encourage new development and redevelopment with in the City,
but at the same t i~e offering certain protections to the adjacent
properties.
The regulations in the Multi-family Zone Districts are of general
concern to me i.n drafting the amended ordinance, and the height
provisions re fe rred to by Mr. Wallace in an earlier memo, and the
setbacks whic:1 you have referred to in your memo of January 29th
are of speci ~ic concern.
The detail~ of this section of the amended Ordinance are not finalized
a t. this tLne, but as to front setbacks, the recommendation to the
elanning ~ommission will be that the front setback be decreased to
ten (10) deet in the multi-family zone district or districts in order
that thv. additiona l area can be utilized for parking at the rear of the
struct~:re, and to provide more flexibility in the location of the
struct.ure or structures on the building lot. Another reasonc it is
my ibtention to conform in general to the Denver Zoning Ordinance
for reasons I shall not go into at this time, and this Ordinance has
a ~en (10) foot minimum front yard requirement in the multi-family
2vne district.
It will be recommended that a certain amount of unobstructed open
space or •livability area" be provided for each dwelling unit BXCLOSIVE
of the required o f f-street parking area.
The number of off-street parking spaces Which I now plan to recommend
will be as follows: buffet apartment---l spaceJ l bedroom apartment
---1.25 spaces; 2 bedroom apartments ---1.50 spaces, 3 or ore
bedroan apartments --2 spaces per unit. I don • t know what the
reaction will be to this recommendation, but I am of the opinion that
it is realistice.
As to the height, I intend to recommend provisions similar to Denver•s
bulk-tent. If this ia accepted, it will have the effect of controlling
the side-setback, but a inimum setback will still be required. If it
is reduced from the present requirement, it will be recommended that
this area can be counted toward the livability area, but cannot be
uoed for off-street parking.
The direction of this high-density district very simply will be to
that of more open space, taller buildings, and underground parking and
away from the rectangle boxes urrounded by asphalt parking lots with
the overflow of cars lin a up and down the street.
I appr ciate the staff"• and th Board"& concern, and I hop to receive
permission to devote all of my time to this matter for ao long as it
may take: for I feel that it is of th utmost urgency. :Seedless to
say, the Building Department and the Board of Adjustment and Appeals
will be ask d to review th draft amendment before it is finalized for
presentation to a Hearing 1£ that is de ed necessary, or if it ia not,
before it ia referr d to COuncil.
/a/ D. Andrews Romans
Planning Director
I • •
·' I !
I ' '!
•
•
•
Mrs. Schneider, secretary to the Board of Adjustment February 5, 1969
RE: MASTER STREET PLAN
'rh.e applicants for a variance for front yard setback and parking in
cutain areas in the 3600 block of south Delaware Street, have asked
me the projected plans for South Delaware Street in thet specific
block in the Master Street Plan.
South Delaware Streti't is shown on the Kaster Street Plan as a local
street from 'fest Belleview Avenue to west Jefferson Avenue, from West
Xthaca Avenue to u. s. 285 and from west Floyd Avenue to West Yale
Avenue. It has been vacated between west Jefferson Avenue and west
Ithaca Avenue thru the Miller Field, and it is not dedicated between
o. s. 285 and west Floyd Avenue.
I know of no plans to change the status of the subject block ---
the street would continue to provide access to the developments
fronting on it, and it would not be designated as a collector or
arterial street.
Please understand, however, that the Traffic Engineer is authorized to
designate Collector and Arterial Streets by the Traffic Ordinance.
/s/ D. A. Romans, Planning Director
M.r. and Mrs. Bruce Newland owners of
3632 South Delaware -object to the variance in the front yard
setback. They own a home across the street from the proposed
compl~~ and they feel it will hurt their value of their property
because it too close to the front of the property.
Jack Eachon
1st Rational Bank -says it is a nice complex and would be an asset
to the community and they are interested in the growth of the area.
Clayton moved,
Pitchford seconded, the PUblic Hearing be closed and the
Board will reconvene February 19. 1969
t 8:00 P. M. to renuer their decision.
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Dallas Tourney
Wetteratrom, Pitchford, Clayton, Hezen
None
Rhodus -------------
3301 south Washington
case No. 69-5
The pplicant requested p rmission to erect a 31 unit apart:.ent
house on south Washington and Zast Floyd with a varianc: in the
frontyard setback on Floyd Avenue. Th Ordinanc requires a 15 ft •
setback and Mr. Tourney is requesting a 10 ft. setback. 'there would
be no parking in the area it ill a landscaped area.
The property has been properly posted and adv rtised for Public
Bearing tonite •
There was no one concerning this variance present except the applicant .
Clayton moved,
Pitchford seconded, the variance be granted and the building
conform to all other phases of the ordinances
and code.
Ayesa Wetterstram, Pitchford, Clayton, Kezen
lllaysa None
Absent: Rhodus
I • •
·' \ !
' '!
•
•
Atty. Richard N. Graham for
Malcolm E. Collier,· Jr.' Case !lO. 69-6
4100 South Bannock
The applicant ~s requesting permission to erect two apartment buildings
with a total of 36 units with a variance in the frontyard setback of
ten ft . and a rearyard to be twenty feet and to pe~t parking in
the front side yard along Oxford Avenue. He will have a total of
42 p arking spaces for 36 units. This is an old school site. The
school building will be torn down. on the south property line there
wo u ld be a retaining wall with a fence on top to protect the neighbors.
The property has b een properly posted and advertised for Public Hearing
for tonite'a meeting. There was no one in opposition at the meeting.
The area is in the process of of being rezoned to R-3-B -The final
hearing before Council was February 3, 1969 and the ordinance will
become final March B, 1969.
Clayton moved,
Pitchford seconded, in view of the over requirements for the
parl:ing and there being no one in opposition
the variance be granted subject to the
zoning becoming final to R-3-B. The build~ng
to meet all other ordinance and codes.
Ayesr Wetterstrom, Pitchford, Clayton, Mezen
!lays; None
Absenta Rhodus
Ruby Marshall Case Jlo. 69-7
3698 South She~
The applicant is requesting pe~~isaion to erect a 3 unit ·~ngelow
type building in an R-2-B zone on 75 ft. frontage. There" ~s an old
residence on the premises which would be removed. The applicant
would build a brick veneer building with between 800 sq. ft. and
900 sq. ft. in each unit. They plan to live in one unit.
The old house on the premises has been conde.aed for two or three
years and is an eyesore to the neighborhood.
The property has been properly posted and advertised as per ordinance.
There was no one present at the hearing in opposition.
Clayton JDOved,
Pitchford sec
since this ia the same ratio aa l uni ta
onded, on 50 ft. and the 3 units will be
under one roof and the old residence will
be reJDOved, the variuu:e be grant d and
Ay at
•aysa
Absent a
all other ordinances and codes be co.plied
with and the proper perai.t be obtained frca
the Buildin9 Department.
lfetterstrca, Pitchford, Clayton, Kezen
&one
Rhodus ------• •
f
•
• ,. .
Metropolitan Leasing Inc . ~~~--~~--~----
3537 South Broadway
Case Jlo. 69-8
Mr. Barry Elliston of lletropolitan Leaeing Inc. requested a variance
to permit a used car business in a B-1 Zone. 'l'hey will be selling,
leasing, repairing cars and retail tire store. 'l'his is in the
Grossman Ford building. The building is to be pnrchased by the
State Highway Department in the near future. The applicant states
they lease the building from month to month. The operation will
employ about 27 people.
Clayton moved,
Pitchford seconded, the applicant be granted a one year
license subject to renewal upon
request.
Ayes:
Hayse
Absent a
Wetterstrom, Pitchford, Clayton, Mezen
JIIOne
Rhodus
Mr. Spoerl db a Roundup Motel Cue 1!!0· 69-10
3205 South Santa Pe
'fhe applicant requested an extension of 60 days to cc.ply with the
Minimum Housing Code. He hu seven units running eut and wat
to Sant:.A Pe and he does not want to fix the east units until the
Columbine Freeway is dete:a:mined. The plumber is to start work
on the reat of the units. 'l'he electrician baa given him a bid
and is to start work soon. The heaters have been taken out of the
bedrooms.
Clayton moved,
Wetteratrom seconded, the ~plicant is making progress
and he be given a 60 day extension
of time to C081ply with the HOusing
Code.
Ayes a
Bays a
Absente
Cartwright, Pitchford, Clayton, Mezen
None
Rhodus
By a unanimous vote Stan Rhodus was elected Chairman for the year
1969 and William Clayton was elected Vice Chairaan for 1969.
'fhere being no further bueiness to CCDe before the Board the
aeeting vas adjourned at l0a30 P. Jl.
APfiCWBD. ____________________ __
Sutie M. Schneider
Recording Secretary
• 1
·.
I • •
.· I ! . ' 'r
•
.JAMC:a 0 . WILLaON, J ...
WI' .LIAM O . UU4 M
Mr. John Criswell
•
WILLSON & LAMM
ATTORNI:YS AT LAW
DENVI:R, COLORADO 80202
eaa-tae~t A"EA COOC: .IOJ
FEB 2 6 1969
Myrick, Criswell k Branney
Attorneys at Law
3755 So. Broadway
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Dear John:
re: Englewood City Hall
You had inquired recently whether any action
mi~ht be taken or proceedings adopted by the Englewood
Bu1lding Authority at this time, preliminary to the issu-
ance of bonds for the City Hall.
Except for the Resolution of the Authority to
authorize the Notice of Sale, which you suggested, there
doesn't appear to be anything further at this point that
can be done, at least until the City Council determines
to proceed with the sale. The Resolution of the Authority
could provide that the details of the bond issue (date of
bonds, maturity schedule, interest payment dates, etc.)
would be determined at a later date.
I did talk with a Mr. Ellis, of the Internal
Revenue Service, who indicated that the prior ruling of
the IRS would still be applicable, notwithstanding the
lapse of time, providing, however, there has been no
change in any law which might affect the issuance of bonds.
Yours very truly,
WOL:dz
cc. Mr. Stephen A. Lyon
•' \ !
'!
I • •
,
•
l • TRODUCED AS , HILL BY c ou.:crL ~1Al'<
BY AUT I!OR lTY
ORDI· A, CE ,O . __f~-' SER I ES OF 1969
A .~ OROl." . CL APPRUVUG Tttt. 11 HO LE COST OF Th E 1:-IPROVI:. ![, TS \
,,11\!J T:: I. .'D FOR SltJEIALh. 1 1PROVL IL· T DI STR ICT 0 . 68 , I. T dL ;:
CI TY OF L ,GLU.uOD , COLORAuO ; AP P WVL G A,'D CO."Fl Rt~l l."G T11L y-
APPO TI O,,;NLt T OF S lU COST 0 LAClt LO Ot TRACT uF L .• u l. C
SA I D DI ST I C' ; ASS L s 1 ; G A S RL OF SA I D COST AG l i S"l l:.A C.I r
LOT 0 TRACT OF LA ,'W J., T II:. DI STR I CT; AN U PRLSCRIBi i•G i"hL
,,!A ,, L TilE COLLI::.CTIO , D PA Y !L."T OF SA IIJ ASSLSS MLtHS .
I<IICRL AS , t he City Coun d 1 of t he City of Ln g lewood, Co lorado,(.
p ursuant to th e Cna rt er and Ordinan ce , o. 14, Se r ies o f 1965, of
said City and t he Laws of t he S tat e of Co lorado, enact ed Or dinance
o. 24 , Se r ies of 1 9b8 , crcat in £ S i de 11alk I mp rove ment Dist r ict
, o . 68 , and p rovj din
6
for t ne construction t he r ein o f side1"alk
i mp rovements; and
1\ldLRE S , t 1e layo r and tli r e ctor of F inance a d v e rt ised (or
b ids to construct su e i mp rovemen t s in three (3) cons e cut ive
1 ee k ly issues of t he E.'GLL\\000 liLRALD; and
1\l!LRt:AS , said ids we r e o pe ned a t 2 :00p .m., Thu r sday,
u g ust 1 5 , 1 968; and
\Hl:.RLAS, on Au g u st 1 9 , 1 968 , t e City Co uncil o f t he City
o f Ln g l ew ood, Col or ado , acce p t ed t h e b id of Pe t er K ie ~it S o ns'
in t he am ount of "1 2 ,439 .54 as t he l01-1es t and bes t bid and
aut ho riz ed the t!ayor and Ci t y Clerk to execut e contract docu-
men ts ; and
Fl!E REAS, t he construction o f s uc h i mp rovements h as been
c om leted and t l1e total co sts of such imp rovemen t s ha v e been
r eliably ascertained; and
WI !.:REAS , a s tat ement sno in g t he total cost of t he i mp rove-
men ts 1as been d uly fi l ed i t h t e Ci ty Co uncil ; and
WI!Ll~L A S , f ro m t he s tat ement made and filed with t he Ci t y
Council, it ap pe a r s t ha t t ne 1 1ole cost of said imp rovements is
the sum o f 15,8 1 4 .97 , said a mount includin g cos ts of ins p ection,
collection an othe r inci en tal s and also inc lu din ~ in t e r est a s
all ow ed by l aw; an
Will: EAS , fro m sai s t atemen t it also a ppea r s t nat t he Ci t y
Council as a pp ortioneo a shar of t h e s aid l•i11o le cost to ea c h
lot or tract of land in said Dis trict, in acco r dance with t e
benefi t s to be de r ived by said p ro pe rt y and in the p ro po rt ions
and am ow1t s severally set fo rth in a Reso lution ado p te d by t 1e
City Council o n the 6th day of Janua r y, 196 , whi c h Res olution
is by r efe r ence made a part h ereof; and
Wl·h~RLAS , , otice of a p ublic he arin g concernin g t e levyin g
of assess ments on t 1e r eal p ro e rty in t he Dis tric t and u p on
this ordinance as been p ub li shed once a week for three (3}
eeks in t he 1.:.. GL .000 1 L Lil, a newspaper of gene ral circula-
tion in the City , and, in addi tion, a co py of tne .otice n as
been ma iled, pos ta e p r epaid , to each no1-1n owner of r eal
p ro pe rty wi t hin t ne District, 1\'hicn • otice is by r ef r enee
rn a de a p art n r eo f ; and I • •
.• \ I
I
'r
•
•
•
•
I"I IERE AS, at t h e ti me and p lace s p ecified in said , otice,
the City Co uncil met in o p en session for the purpose of hearin g
any objections or p rotests that mi ght be made a g ainst said ass e ss-
ments; and
WHE REAS, all o j e ctions an d co mp laints n avin g b een dul y
h eard and con s idere d , t he Council h a s determin e d t h at such ob -
jections s h oul b e d eni ed exce p t as t h is Ordinance h as acce p ted
them and incorp orated he r e i n c h an ges i n said assessments base d
upon said objections; and
hH ·REAS , on t he 6 t h day o f J a nuary, 1 969 , a Bill for An
Or din ance Approvin g Th e \hole Cost Of The I mp rovements l ade In
And Fo r S idewalk Improvement Di s trict o. 6 8 , In Th e City Of
En g lewood, Colorado; App rovin g And Con f irmin g The App ortion ment
Of S aid Cost To Each Lot Or T ract Of Land In S aid District ;
Assessin g A Sh a r e Of S aid Cost Ag ainst ach Lo t Or T ract Of
Land In The Dist r ict; And P rescri b in g The .I anne r Th e Collect i o n
And P ay ment Of Said Assessments, was introduced by Council man
P ark inson and was passed on first readin g .
l 0 \~, THE Ri:FOR E , E I T OR DAI 1 ED BY THE CITY COU 1 CIL OF HI::
CITY OF E1 GL EIOOD , COLORADO, as follows:
S ecti o n 1 . That t he aforesaid Bill f or an Or dinance is
h ereby amended ana t his Or dinan c e is subs titute d t he r efo r .
Section 2 . Th at t e '" 1ole cost and a pp ortion me nt o f t he
s a me , as set f ortn in sai Reso lution and 1 otice and as amended
herein , is h e r e b y a p p roved and confirmed, and said a p p ort ionment
is h ere b y decla r ed to be in acco r dance with t he benefits wh ich
the p ro p erty in said Dist r ict will r eceive by r eason o f the
construction of sai d i mp rovements, ano a share o f said cost is
h ere by assesse d to and upon each lot or tract o f land within
t e District in t e p ro p ortion s an amounts set f orth in sai
esolution an ."otice.
Se ction 3 . T at s ai d Res olution l s he re by chan ged a s follo ws :
(a) Of t ile wh ole cost of 15,8 14.9 7! t h e City of l:.n g l e-
oo will p a y $1 ,777.99 , l e avi ng a b alance o f $13,99 7.6 0 to b e
ass e ssed a g ainst t he re a l p ro p erty in said Dist r ict.
(b ) The su m of ~13,99 7 .60 will be apportioned to t he
real p ro pe rt y in s aid Dist ri c t and assessed as set forth in said
Res olution which esolution is h ere by amended in t he followin g
p articulars:
Glenn Otis l az e l
J•1 c C r e ady
2 8 2 7 S out h Che r o kee
I::n g l e wood, Colorado
Ralph P . ,•J aurine
Zieg l e r
2 717 South Che r o ·ee
cngle1 oo d , Colo r ati o
Eileen L . Fe l z i en
2 711 Soutn Che rokee
Eng l ch•oou, o lor a o
Block
o. Subdivision
I. 1 3 I d l ew ild S u bd ivi s ion
42-4 4 1 2 II
45-46 1 2 II
-2-
Ass essment
Cost
$ 8 7.5 1
110 .:18
ll8 . 4
I • •
f
•
James •'· f, Mil d r ed
P . Johnson
2749 S outh Ban n ock
n g l ewood , Colo r ado
35-3 6
•
11
, .
Idlewild S u bdi vision non e
He r be rt J . G !arion
G. Dorn
37-38 11 " 1 65 .25
2743 S outh Bannock
En g l ewood , Co lora do
Nar g aret Ransde ll
2874 S out h Bannock
~n g lewood, Colorado
1 9 & 1 4 " 1 09 .06
; 1/2
of 2 0
Se ction 4. Tha t said assessments sha ll be due and payab l e a t
t e office o f t he City Treas ure r, with out demand, 1•i t hin t hi rt y
d ay s from and after t he fina l p ublication of t his Or dinance . In
case any owne r of r ea l p rope rt y assessed under t his Or d inance shall
fail to p ay t he who l e o f s uch assessment a g ainst his p rope rt y 'ith-
in said t hi rty days , t hen , th e p ro r a ta cost of said i mp rovements
s o assessed a g ainst his p rope rt y , to g e t he r wi t h in t e r es t at t he
rate of 6% pe r annum on any un p aid ba lance, s all be ayah l e in
five equal annual install me nts, t he first o f which installments
of p rinci pa l an d interest shall be due and p ayable on or before
January 1,19 70 , and th e re ma inde r of sa i d inst a llme nts shall be
due and p aya b le successively on or before t he 1st day of January ,
in each year thereaft e r, until said p rinci p al and intere s t are
paid in full. Failure to p ay any install me nt, whether of p rin-
cipal or interest, when due shall cause the wh ole of t he un p ai d
p rinci pa l to be come due and p ayab l e i mmedia tel y , and t he wh ole
amount o f t he un p aid p rinci pa l and accrued interes t shall t he r e aft e r
draw interest at t ne rate of one pe r centum (1 %) pe r month , or
fraction of a mont h , until t he d ate of tax sale, as by law p ro-
vided, b ut at any ti me p rior to th e date o f t he s al e, any owner
may p ay t he a mount o f all un p aid installments with interest at
on e pe r c en tum (1 %) pe r month, or fraction of a mont h, u p on all
de linq uent ins tallmen t s , and all pena lties accrue d, and s h all
t he reup on be r est ored to t he ri gh t t he rea fte r to pay in ins tall-
ments in t he same manne r as if default h a not been s uf fe re d .
The own e r of any p ro pe rty not in de fault as to any installment
or p ay me nt ma y , at any ti me, p ay the whole o f the un p aid prin-
cipal with accrued inter st to the date of the next assessment
install men t paymen t date . ayments may be made to t e City
Treasurer at a ny time within thirty days afte r t he final publi-
cation of t his Or dinan ce, an d an allowance o f five pe r c en tum
(5~) will be made on all paymen t s made du ri ng such pe rio d , bu t
not therea ft e r . Immediately after t e exp iration of s uc h t hi rt y
day pe rio d , said assessments sha ll be ccrtifie to t e Count y
r eas ure r of Arapah oe Coun t y , Colora do, for collection, as
p rovi ded by law.
Sec tion 5 . T at if any one or mo r e sections or p arts of
t his Or dinance shall be adjudg ed unenforceable or in v alid, s uch
judgme nt shall not affect, impair or invalidate t he re maininr
p rovi sions of tnis Ordinance, it being th" intention that the
various p rovisions he r eof a r e seve r able.
Se ction o . 'fhis urdinance, after its final p assa e, shall
be recor ed in tn e City Or dinance Uoo kep t fo r that p urp ose,
snall be auth nticated by t ne si gnatures of t he .1 ayor and City
Clerk, and snall be p ublished in t he L.'G Lt .DOD IlL LD, a news-
pape r of gene ral circulation p ublished in sa id City, within
-3-
• I
I • •
,
•
•
seven days after its final passage, and s ha ll be and r emain
irrepealable until t he assessmen t s he re by made sna ll be pai d i n full .
t he Introduced, r ea in fu ll and p asse d on first r eadin g on
day of -------' 1 969 .
P ublis h ed as a Bi 11 for an Or d inance on t he
' 1 9 6 9 . ----------day of
Re ad by title and p a ssed on final r eading on t he
day of , 1969.
P u b lish ed as Ordinance 1o. , Se ries of 1 969 , on the
day of -------I9"'9".
Mayor
Attes t:
C1ty Clerk-Treasurer
I, S te phe n A . Lyon d o he r eby c e rt ify t h at t h e a b ove and
f oregoing i s a tr ue , accurat e and complete cop y of an Ordinance
p as sed on final r eading on t he ___ d a y of , 1 969 ,
and p ublis hed as Or dinance , o. , c r ies of 1969, on t he
day of , l !lor.--
Attest:
--ci t y Cle r k -Tr eas urer
•.
I • •
' 2
•
•
•
WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain changes are necessary to also provide
sanitary sewer head tap fees for commercially and residentially zoned properties,
outside the corporate limits of the City of Englewood, Colorado; and, to provide
additional revenue for sewage treatment plant capital improvements;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that sanitary sewer head tap fees, for taps out-
side the corporate limits of the City of Englewood, Colorado, esta~he~ March 10 1
1958, be revised, as follows: c:-0 /::-;::-(;~ I ,,.. C't(. C' I
SANITARY S~ HEAD TAP FEES 'J?'v Oo~ 1..
c C'o t1f4!( ~"o C'v"r~ ~ (J~C' J·~ ~~ OUTSIDE CITY
Q~ '<. 09 ~ /;'~ 11,/;! Effective April 1, 1969
AVAILABILITY:
Gt..~ '-r1,
11--o 'G ~
Available to users taking Englewood sewage treatment servic;p~~e
the corporate limits of the City of Englewood, Colorado. Q~
APPLICABILITY: Applicable for industrial, commercial and re~idential service, except
when other fees are in effect by specific contract.
SCHEIXJIE I -Sanitary Sever Head Tap Fees For INDUSTRIAL AND CO~IMERCIAL PROPERTIES,
except those listed in SCl!EillLE Ila
Rate Per Acre
Total Acreage For Connections Rates For Larger Connections
In Tract 6-Inch Or Smaller 8-Inch 10-Inch 12-Inch
1 Acre $ 215.00 110> 110> > c, c, c, c, c, c,
Next 2 Acres 143.00 .... .... ....
~ ~ 0 ~
Next 2 Acres 72.00 fj fj c+
0
0.. CD ....
Next 5 Acres 36.00 I I ? ~ H
fi H
Next 5 Acres 18.00 ;::r ;::r 5 ;::r
S' S' ~ All Over 15 Acres 1.00 ' c+
" Cl
Less than one (1) acre will be prorated at $ .005 per square foot, with minimum
charge, in all cases, to be $150.00 per tap.
SCHEDUlE II -Sanitary Sewer Head Tap Fees For RESIIENTIAL AND O'lHER PROPERTIES
WJTII SPECIFIC tm:r ----
Residential -Single Family Unit
Residential -Multiple Family Units
- -$ 75.00 Per Tap
75.00 Per Tap For First Unit and
6S.oo For Each Additional Unit
Schools - --- - - - - -- ----- - -75.00 Per Tap Based on Each 12
Pupils of School Capacity
Equivalent to 1 Tap
Hospitals -- -- --- --- -- - - - -75.00 Per Tap Based on Each 4
Beds of Hospital Capacity
Equivalent to 1 Tap
Trailer Courts --- - - ----- - - - -7S .00 Per Tap Based on Each 3
Trailer Sites Equivalent
to 1 Tap
Churches -------- - -- - - - - --75 .00 Per Tap
Head Tap fees for all other properties not listed in SCHEilJLE II shall be
.. .• \ ! . , .
I • •
-
•
•
Page Two
determined on an area basis in accordance with SCHEDULE I.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be published in ).he Englewood Herald
and Enterprise for two successive issues commenc i ng on March ~' 1969 .
Introduced and adopted by City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado at
a~~/{?,{; session held March .._L, 1969.
Mayor
ATTEST:
I . .
I !
I
'T
-
ROLL CALL
/
-
• . -
--
•
0
•
I • •
0
· . . .
-
•
~
~
0 u
~
ROLL CALL
BROWN
DHO R ITY
KREILING
LAY
LONE
PARKlNSON
SCHWAB
•
• •
(J) (J)
til :>< ~ ::i
1/ --;;::? -
t::;;. ~
I I--" ._..l.---"
L ~
1/ I> a
.
R ll~
i v
6 /J -/
I . •
..· \ r
I
'!'
-
•
~
0 z
0 u
~
ROLL CALL
BROWN
DHO RI TY
KREILING
LAY
LONE
PARKINSON
SCH WAB
•
0
•
~ §
• • \ r
"
I · •
f
• -• .
• •
..
ROLL CALL
I· •
. , . . • \ I
I • 'I'
• -• .
• •
ROLL CALL
~ ~ ~ §
BROWN
DHORI TY
KRE ILING
LAY
LONE
PARKIN SON
SCHWAB
I . .
•
• ,~----~-
-• .
• •
ROLL CALL
UJ UJ
~ >< ~ ~ ~ §
BROWN
DHORITY
KREILING
LAY
LONE
PARKINSON
SCHWAB
I· •
• . , --~~~~~~~' X
• ~~~-~----
-• .
0
•
ROLL CALL
Cl
5 u
~ ~
U) U)
til ;><
~ ~
1--BROWN
~ DHO RITY
I--KREILING
~ LAY
1---LONE
PARKINSON
__,
SCHWAB ......
~70
I . •
..• \ l
' • 'f
-
~
•
a z
0 u
~
iY
ROLL CALL
BROWN
DHORITY
KREILING
LAY
LONE
PARKINSON ' SCHWAB I
> P J
(JJ
J(<-)
•
0
•
til til
t:<l ><
~ ~ -
1/
~
v I-
I~ ----........... -~ -!/ ---'-""""
('.
#£
/ ~
~·
~
I . •
..• \ !
'
•
• •
ROLL CALL
)
I • •
f
• -
• •
-
ROLL CALL
BROWN
DHORITY
KREILING
LAY
LONE
PARKINSON
SCHWAB
!2 I . •
•
• . , ·' I I
I .,. f
-
•
~
0 z
0 u
~
ROLL CALL
BROWN
DHORITY
KREILING
LAY
LONE
PARKINSON
SCHWAB
Ul
~
~
1/
v
I.
v
v v v
•
• •
Ul
:><
::i.
-;?'
1-----:7:
"/'"" --~
":7" 1...--
~
(jj)
. , •• \ r
I
' '
I· •
-
•
~
~
0 u
~
RO LL CALL
~
BROWN
DHO RITY
KREILING
LAY
LONE
PARKINSON
SCHWAB
7 (i )
7 (A-"J
J ./ zr
• . .
• •
§
~·
(_ ./) ...?'\
_/7:1 _.£2_
/ ~ 7
t?---4 ~-~ .. _
I . .
· . . ,
• -•
• •
ROLL CALL
BROWN--------~~~~~--
DHO RITY
KREILING
LAY
LONE
PARKINSON
SCHWAB
I . •
·. ·' \ I
' . ,
'!
-
..1
I--
•
~
0 u
~
ROLL CALL
BROWN
DHO RITY
KREILING
LAY
LONE
PARKINSON
SCHWAB
•
• .
• •
U) U)
til ><
?;! ~
LJ?::/1
v _,..-
·~..-P"""'7
./' ~~
/ /' v /
J--P
I . •
. , \ !
I
!
-
•
~
0 z
0 u
~
ROLL CALL
BROWN
DHO RITY
KREILING
LAY
LONE
PARKINSON
SCHWAB
•
•,
• •
U) U)
[£! >< ~ ;;;
I ~ v ::t:=-.,_ .... ~
1/ L--
. -,__. -1--
L.-~ ----/_;:/ -::::::;;; ,.,....
a --!d/0
I· •
· . . '
-
ROLL CALL
5/-1
;) /~
)_) _//,
•
• •
bj • tv
C/ ,._.4_,
A) I. '
L~-~·~:' ..:>0
(., ov
@
I I,_ • •.
2.--\r·
I~
I l -l..
l iZ
1./ ~ ~ . "/
-
I • •
.• I I
' .,. f 2
-
•
•
~
•
q z
0 u
~
ROL L CALL
BROWN
DHO RITY
KREILING
LAY
LONE
PARKINSON
SCHWAB
. -
•
• •
U) U)
tJl ><
~ r;,
I . •
. , \ I
I .,.
• -• •
ROLL CALL
Ul Ul
~ ~ ~ >< ~ ~-
BROWN I. v~
DHORITY [/ "'7"
KREILING 7"' ~
LAY --r;; -::;?'
LONE """[/ ----PARKINSON 1/ L.---
SCHWAB I 17
{(C,) ~'
3 _, ~ (.,.
0{j) ~t ~·
& ir ~
/J ~J (> , I • •
R
. ' •
•
'I • -
• •
ROLL CALL
BROWN
DHORITY
KREILING
LAY
LONE
PARKINSON
SCHWAB
I . •
0
•
-
•
1
0 z
0
()
~
ROLL CALL
BR OWN
DHOR ITY
KREILING
LAY
LONE
PARKINSON
SCHWAB
~
~
--""
1,/
__!:::::
~ v
J:,.--1
• . '
• •
~ -
~ ,......---1-
~
Iii"' ~ ~
I . •
. ,
-
~
•
~
0
tJ
~
ROLL CALL
BROWN
DHO RITY
KREILING
LAY
LONE
PARKlNSON
SCHWAB
• . .
0
• . .
~ §
I . •
,/ ..
. ' ,
-
~
Q z
0 u
~
ROLL CALL
BR OWN
DHO RIT Y
KREILING
LAY
LONE
PARKINSON
SCHWAB
• . "
0
•
Ul Ul
til > :;: ~
l
I . •
• -
• •
'. -
ROLL CALL
BROWN
DHORITY
KREILING
LAY
LONE
PARKINSON
SCHWAB
I . .
• I , 2
-
c.l :.:
_1.
I
I
r L
Cl z
0 u
c.l
.Jll
ROLL CALL
BROWN _j
DHORITY J KREILJNG
LAY
LONE
l PARKINSON
.J SCHWAB
•
• •
~ ~~ _j
I -
-
.l -1
I . •
0
• ,_
-
• •
ROLL CALL
BROWN
DHO RITY
KREILING
LAY
LONE
PARKINSON
SCH WAB
,_2..(!-'\ -Q.
(_.. .. .c.. ( ~---/ /);,I ·;
I "'.-t!> {; ' ) l .. I l.V A If'· } t:'-
~~ .. s ~. ~ ::<A..
_E )_ ~~-,.,·~·~·
~~~ ~·
.~ 3 1~v r ~-;I ~
I ~It ~(~~~ • • -/~
~ -Vc'~ ~ A ~
~~/.: ....,
.• I !
I
'r
-
•
~
a z
0
(.)
~
ROLL CAL L
BROWN
DHO RITY
KRE ILI NG
LAY
LONE
PARKINSON
SCHWAB
Ul
~
~
~~
v
\...-
v
I/
I/
[.,.,.>
•
• •
Ul
>< :i
l----·___.-
~
~
--_;;;:;;; -~
I . •
' "
•
~rr
w a: .....
I
.....
~
.....J w
I
:.I: .....
:J
0
(/)
I
I
'0 \ 30'
0
"' $
"'
I
!
<r
~
"co
ID
' "'
---------
ENGLEWOOD CITY HALt -~
I"
I ~ .. "" I ~. '\ w §I .. <1' '\
51 '\
~I '\
el '\
~I " ~I '\
N '\
;r~
'\ '\
"
-~~ ~I
~-~
~ -
~ :~~---7 -t-~ -4-WEST -~--~fiAMPD~N -;AVE;.NUE\\
•
~"-~ -
4
w SUB DIVI S ION .....J I
II' ~II 1075'
BLOCK TWO
I u '
so·
4
M C KINLEY'S
BLOCK ON£
7 w w
~
I ~111: I 2
3 8
u
' "" ~':...-i l l!~ . llll"•t • --~--~---.._:._:-~~ ~~
300
Ill
10 ~ ~I 12 13
I FILING
'\
'\ 13 1' 60 60
'\ ~ 1\ ;1 1
''\ ~~~
I "\._ ~I I
I '\ . cr:l l
I " -~
.y -
I <l'o )QI
'\ ~-N
I '\
0o".l
" I I I
5 I __ 90
·-
11
-COLORADO -HIG HWAY-70·-----:-.
h
... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~· ~ ~ . ~ ~ •.
.... ...
"co
"'
~
w w a: .....
<Q
w w
~
0 a: w
:.I: u
I
:J: ..... a
(/)
I
•
•
., ..
. r ,
•
3/KJ / to9
&&!tv 1 s-o r2
a:~~ "'-~ o; rP
e"Y o"'
Col..J ""' rc/'..f't... c I 4 ' . '"~·v Oocl..
QUIT CL AIM DEED ,._ Atgf? > ,..0 0 A1€"11t.,.
,.., '-Ot. ..::J '" '-''l:t vtvc o.9
THE C ITY Or ENGLEWOOD, a Municipal Corporation Sf:t~~ S\~e of
Gf..E=-•!,,.
Colorado, whos e addres s i s 3 400 S . Elati , Eng l ewood , County of Ar~(jger.-'t...E"
·co and State o f Colorado , for the consideration of ------One------Dolla r , in 4Q.
hand paid , hereby se lls, con •eys and quit c laim s to THE riRST NATION AL
BANK OF J:NGLEWOO D , who se add ress is 33 11 S. Broadway , J:nglewood ,
County of 1\rapahoe and State of C olorado , th e following r e al prope rty
situate in th e County of Arapa ho e and State of Colo rado, to-wit:
PARCEL I:
Commenci n g at th Southeast c orne r of the SWt of t he SW~ of Section
3 4, Town ship 4 South , Range 68 West of the 6th P .M .; thence No rtherly
along the LaSt line Of said sw~ Of t h e S W~ 1 a distance Of 68,00 feet to
a point on the North li ne of West Hampde n /\venue, as est ablished by
Deed reco rd e d on January 2 9 , 1953, in Bo ok 789 at Page 192 , s aid
point belng the tn 1<~ point o f b e ginning; then ce o n an ang l e to the left
of 89 °49'03" and a long s aid North line a distance of 3 13.33 feet to
the East line of South Elati St reet; thence on an a ~JJle to the right of
89 ° 50 '1 0" and a long said East li n e of South Elati Street a dis tance o f
1 44 .1 4 feet , mo r e or less , to a point 45 0 f eet South of th e No rth line
of the S£~ SWt SWt of said Sectio n; thence f.ast and parallel with
said No rth line a d i s tanc e of 3 1 3 .29 feet to a point on th e East line
o f s aid SWi o f th 0 SWt; thence on an angle to the rig ht of 8 9 °57'10"
and along s aid East line a distance of 1 44 .88 feet to the true point of
beginning.
PA RC£1. IT:
Commenc mg at the South e ast c orner of the swt of th e SW~ of Sec tion
3 4 , Tow n ~hip 4 South, Range 6 8 West of the 6th P .M.; thence North erly
long the r:ast line of s a id swt of th e swt a distance of 68.00 f eet to
a p oi nt on the Nort h line of West Hampden Avenu e , as established by
Dec>d r ecord ed on 1\ugust 11 , 1 954 , in Book 871 at Page 558 , s aid point
h0inq th e tru e point o f hcginnlnq; th ence continuinCJ alonq the a foresa id
l '•"'rs•. u rlistan c.l of I !j7 .0 0 feet to o point on ll tc Sl'lllh !Jn<· of Blo ·k 1 ,
McKin l ey 's Subdivi s ion , 2nd Filing ; thence on an angle to the r ig ht of
0 °10'57 " and a l ong s aid Sou th line a distanc e of 75.00 f c>e t; the nce on
an ang l e to the ri']ht of 89 ''4 9 '03" and parallel with s aid r:ast li ne of the
s w! of th e sw! a distanc of 157 .00 feet t o a point o n the orth line
of sa id W est Hampde n Avenue; the n ce on an ang l e t o th e right o f
0 °10'57" and along said Nort h line a distance of 75.00 fe t to the point
of b eg inning.
Pi\RC r:L IIl:
Comme n cing at the Southeast corner of the swt of the swt of Section 3 4 I
Town s hip 4 South , "ange 6 8 West of the 6th P.M.; thence Northerly
Jon(] th e r.ast line of said s wt of the swt a di s tance of 68 .00 feet to
a pomt on th e North line of West Hampden Avenue , as es t ablis hed by
Deed reco rd don August 11 , 1954, in Book 871 at Pal)e 558; thence on
an angl e t o th0 right of 90 °10 '57" and a long said North line a distance
of 1 GS . 00 f0rt to the tru e point of b eqi nning; thence o n an ang l e to t he
l c>ft of 0 1 0'5 7'' a d i s tance o f 1 57 .0 0 feet to a point on th e South line
of Block I, Mf'Kml0y 's Subdtvision , 2nd Filing; then •c on an angle to
the !lqht o( 'lO 10'5 7" and along said South line a dt s t<~nc u o f 14 6.00 I • •
'
-
• I f
•
•
•
f eet to a point on th e W e st lin e of South Cherokee Str eet; thence on
an ang l e to the ri g ht of 8 9 °49 '0 3 " and a l o ng said Wes t lin e a d istance
of 1 62 .1 0 f eC't to a point on the North line of said W e st Ham pde n
Avenu e ; th e n ce W est e rly along said N orth line di stanc e of 146 .33
f e e t t o th e tru e p oint of be innin!J .
PARCCL IV;
1\11 of Lot s ll t o l3 nnd th at part of Lo t 10 lyinl) Southe a s t n rly of th e
c aseme nt for il publi c s lrclel or hi l)hW ci Y ilS de scr ib •~d in ,1 11 C'il seme nt
')rant d Le d llerr!mb e r 1 I 1')6b , [rom Longmont l ;ompa ny c t ill as g r nturs
to the C ity of l:nqle wootl , g rant e e , r ecord e d in th e record s of 1\ra p a h oe
County , C o l orado 1 in Book 1 70 3 at Pa g e 597 , all of sa i d des c r ibed
prope rty b e in g in 81 ck 1 of McKi nl e y's Subdivi s ion , Second Filing ,
a c c ording to the record e d plat thereof.
PARCEL V :
T hat portion of the North 45 0 f e e t of the Ea s t 1/2 of th e sr:i swt swt
of Sec tion 34 , Town ship 4 South , Ra n g e 68 W e st o f th e 6th P.M. ,
Exce pt the W est 1 7 f e e t th e re of , lying S outh o f th e e as e ment for a public
s treet or highway a s d e s cri b e d in a n easeme nt grant dated De cembe r 1,
1966 , from I.onqmont C ompany , e t a l, as grantors , to th e C ity of Engl e -
wood, grilntee , r ec01ded in t h e recordn o f .1\rapahoe o unty , Colorado ,
in Book 1 703 at Pag e 597 .
with all its appurtenances .
The purpos e of thi s Quit Claim Dee d i s to re l e as e a nd d is charge th e
covenant s affecting th e a b ove described prope rty c r e a t e d by Lea se to th e
grantor recorded Ma rch 3 , 1 9 66 , in Bo ok 1 653 at Page 10 0 I a nd any covena nts
affecti n'] said property in favor of gru ntor by Dee d s re cord(·d i n Boo k 1704 1
Page 2 75 , and in Book 1 70 4 , Page 2 78 ,
Signe d th is ____ da y of February , 1969 .
ATTEST :
--------City~-Clerk
S TATE Or COLOR.I\DO)
) 3 !:;
Cou nty of .1\rap <.~lio•• )
THE C ITY OF E NG LEWOOD , a Munici pal
c orporation
By _________________________ ___
Mayor
The foreqoing instru ment was a c know l edC)e d b e fo r e me this ___ da y o f
february , 1 6 q , by as Mayor , and --------
------as Ci ty~ of Th e City of Eng l ewood , a Munici pal corpora -
tion of the S t atn of ·Cito%ao .
Witn s s my hand and offic i a l s al .
My c orn nu s sion ex p i res. ___________ _
Not<~ty Public
,_
I • •
·' I I
I ' '!
.:.
•
•
_)
•
•
3/lo/&9
~!tgO:Z
~~ "'7'8" 5?' Crry 0 F" F" I Co uN--:,,C I A l
r :: '·~~. rocu ..... • 'o ..,._NT
f1 ,q 3 '89
couN
Df.C LARJ\TIO N Or PROTE CT IVC C OV EN A~~ OF' il l.;:::r_ ,·, ''G
• NGL c:wc;;. F'I L£::
oo, coLo
Th e unders i gned, TH E fi RST NATION J\1 BANK O F ENGLEWOOD , a National .
13a nk , t he ownc't of t h e follo winq describe d property s ituate i n t he County of
Arapaho e , State of Col orud0 1 to -wit :
Comm nclng t the Southe<%t corn e r of th e s wt of t h e SW~ of Sec tion
311 I Town ship !I Sout h , n ange 68 W e st of lhe 6th p.M .; th e nce Northe rly
a l ong the l:u s t line of sai d s w~ of the s wt a distanc e of 68 .0 0 f e et to
a point on the No rth li nr of W est Ha mpde n J\ve nu e 1 a s e s t abli s h ed by
Deed r ecord d on January 29 1 19 53 1 in Bo o k 789 at Page 1 'JZ 1 said point
being the tru e point of beg inning ; th ence on an angle to the l e ft o f
89 "49 '0 3 " a nd along said . orth line a distanc e o f 3 1 3 .33 fe e t lo the
East ll ne of South Elati S t ree t ; thence on an ang l e t o the right of 89 °
5 0 ' 1 0 " and a lo ng said Ea s t line of South Elati Street a dist an r c of
14 4 .1 4 f 0c t
1
more or l e s s , to a point 1\5 0 feel South o f t h e No rth line
o f th e S C! S W~ swt o f said s ectio n; th e nce East and para ll e l with s aid
North l tne a d i s ta n ce o f 3 1 3 ,l q fee t to a point on th e Eust line of sai d
swt of th e s w{; t h ence on a n ang l e to the right of 89 '57'10" nd u l o ng
s aid L:a st line <1 distance o f 1 44 .8 8 f ee t to the tru e point o f beg i nning ,
for a valuabl e c onsideration, th e receipt and sufficiency of whi c h is h ereby
a c knowledg e d
1
doe s h e reby impo se upo n said r e al prope rty t he following co n-
dition s and c ovena nts , in favo r of Th e City of Englewood, a Muni c i pal
c orporation of the Sta t e of C olorado:
1. No s tru c ture is to b e perm itted within the W e st 14 feet of the
said abo v e describ ed l a n d .
2 . No s t ructur i n ex css of 1 0 f ee t in heig ht above th e qrad c line
of the ce Le r line of Elati Street adjace nt to said d e scribed land is to
b e permitt e d within th e East 17 fee t of the W e s t 3 1 feet of the s a i d
a bove des c ribed land .
The restric t ive covenant s contained h erein shall continu e for a period
of fift y ye ars f rom the d ale here of and sha ll c onstitu te c ovenants ru nning with
the land for the ben e fit of T he City o f .engle wood 1 a Munici p ·ll c orp orution •
The C ity of I:ng l ewood may at any tim e re p eal t he covenants hereinabove con-
tained
1
in who l e or in part , by Res olutio n of t he City C ouncil for the City o f
Enqlcwood . I • •
• I
.• \ !
I ' '!'
,
•
•
IN WlTNES S WHE REOF, The fir s t Natio nal Bank of Cng l c w oo has caused
the s e pre s ent s to b e e x ecut ed th i s 17lh day of february , 1969 , by its duly
a uthorized o ffi cers .
ATTE ST :
,ja~k E . Culver , Vic e Pre sident & Cashier
/(S I:AL~
STATE OF COLORAD O )
) 5 5
Cou nty of Ara pa hoe )
_£
The for e goi ng in s tru me nt was acknowledg e d b e fore me this _LZ_ Clay of \ j ' ) I \ J , v' (} (} ...,.c=-' f . Lh /
February , 1 969 , by ~ D ·Cd' b I t ; (1.•--"'-t ;• (C( <Ac--<J :fW0 ·
~ v
of T h e first N ational Bank of Eng l e w ood.
Witness my ha n d a nd o ffi c i al s eal.
Notary Public
My c ommission ex p ire s: r /-It/-1 tJ
-2-
I • •
'
•
•
•
OFFICIAL
CITY COU C"ll.. nOCU M NT
,...,. I J ... \
Introduced as a Bill b y Councilman Lay.
COU NC..I L f,, __ , 1, iG F ILE
CJI.'t 0£ ENGLEWOOD, CQLQ.
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. 10, SERIES OF 1969
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE WHOLE COST OF THE IMPROVE-
MENTS MADE IN AND FOR SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO . 68 ,
IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO; APPROVING AND CONFIRMING
THE APPORTIONMENT OF SAID COST TO EACH LOT OR TRACT OF LAND
IN SAID DISTRICT; ASSESSING A SHARE OF SAID COST AGAINST EACH
LOT OR TRACT OF LAND IN THE DISTRICT; AND PRESCRIBING THE MANNER
THE COLLECTION AND PAYMENT OF SAID ASSESSMENTS.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Englewood,
Colorado, pursuant to the Charter and Ordinance No. 14, Series
of 1965, of said City and the Laws of the State of Colorado,
enacted Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1968, creating Sidewalk
Improvement District No. 68, and providing for the construction
therein of sidewalk improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Director of Finance advertised
f o r bids to construct such improvements in three (3) consecutive
weekly issues of the ENGLEWOOD HERALD; and
WHEREAS, said bids were opened at 2:00p.m ., Thursday,
August 15, 1968; and
WHEREAS, on August 19, 1968, the City Council of the
City of Englewood, Colorado, accepted the bid of Peter Kiewit
Sons' in the amount of $12,439.54 as the lowest and best bid
and authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute contract
documents; and
WHEREAS, the construction of such improvements has
been completed and the total costs of such improvements have
been reliably ascertained; and
WHEREAS, a statement showing the total cost of the
improvements has been duly filed with the City Council ; and
WHEREAS, from the statement made and filed with the
City Council, it appears that the whole cost of said improve-
ments is the sum of $15,814.97, said amount including costs of
inspection, collection and other incidentals and also including
interest as allowed by law; and
WHEREAS, from said statement it also appears that the
City Council has apportioned a share of the said whole cost to
each lot or tract of land in said District, in accordance with
the benefits to be derived by said property and in the proportions
and amounts severally set forth in a Resolution adopted by the
City Council on the 6th day of January, 1969, which Resolution
is by reference made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, Notice of a public hearing concerning the
levying of assessments on the real property in the Distr ict and
upon this ordinance has been published once a week for three
(3) weeks in the Englewood Herald, a newspaper of general cir-
culation in the City, and, in addition, a copy of the Notice has
been mailed, postage prepaid, to each known owner of real property
within the District, which Notice is by reference made a part
hereof; and
WHEREAS, at the time and plac e specified in said Notice,
the City council met in open session for the purpose of hearing
any objections or protests that might be made against said assess-
ments; and
..
,
·' \ !
'!'
I • •
,
•
WHEREAS, all obj ection s and complaints having been
dul y heard and considered, the Council has determined that such
objections should be denied except as this Ordinance has accepted
them and incorporated herein changes i n said assessments based
upon said objections; and
WHEREAS, on the 6th day of January, 1969, a Bill for
An Ordinance Approving The Whole Cost Of The Improvements Made
In And For Sidewalk Improvement District No. 68, In The City Of
Englewood, Colorado; Approving And Confirming The Apportionment
Of Said Cost To Each Lot Or Tract Of Land In Said District;
Assessing A Share Of Said Cost Against Each Lot Or Tract Of
Land In The Distr ict ; And Prescribing The Manner The Collection
And Payment Of Said Assessments, was introduced b y Councilman
Parkinson a nd was passed on first reading.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1. That the aforesaid Bill for an Ordinance
is hereby amended and this Ordinance is substituted therefor.
Section 2. That the whole cost and apportionment of
the same, as set forth in said Resolution and Notice and as
amended herein, is hereby approved and confirmed, and said
apportionment is hereby declared to be in accordance with the
benefits which the property in said District will receive by
reason of the construction of said improvements, and a share
of said cost is hereby assessed to and upon each lot or tract of
land within the District in the proportions and amounts set forth
in said Resolution and Notice.
Section 3. That said Resolution is hereby changed
as follows:
(a) Of the whole cost of $15,814.97, the City of
Englewood will pay $1,817.37, leaving a balance of $13,997.60
to be assessed against the real property in said District.
(b) The sum of $13,997.60 will be apportioned to the
real property in said District and assessed as set forth in said
Resolution which Resolution is hereby amended in the following
particulars:
Name and Address Lot No. Block Subdivision Assessment
No. Cost
Glenn Otis & Hazel I. N~ of 13 Idlewild Subdivision $ 87.51
McCready
2827 South Cherokee
Englewood, Colorado
Ralph P. & Maurine
Ziegler
2717 South Cherokee
Englewood, Colorado
Eileen E. Feizien
2711 South Cherokee
Englewood, Colorado
James N. & Mildred
P. Johnson
2749 South Bannock
Englewood, Colorado
Herbert J. & Marion
G . Darn
2743 South Bannock
Englewood, Colorado
•
41; all
42
42-44 12 110.98
45-46 118.64
35-36 ll none
37-38 165.25
-· \ r
or
I •
. '
•
'a
1-
•
•
•
Name and Ad d res s Lot No . Block Subdivis i on Assessment
~ Cost
Margare t Ra n sd e ll
28 74 South Bannock
Engl e wo o d, Color ado
1 9 & 1 4 I dl ewild Subdivi sion $109.06
~
of 2 0
Leo M. & Laur a J . s 0 1 59.31
Ho d gkin
28 7 8 South Bannoc k
Englewood , Colorado
11
•
pa yab l e a
within
h all be d u e and
r , i th out demand,
1 al public ati on of this
p r o rty asses sed under
whol of s uch a ss e ssment
h 1 r y day s, then, the pro rata
a ses d agai n s t h is property, together
p r c n per a nnum on any unpaid
balance , shall be payable in f 1v equal a nnual i n stallments, the
first of which ins t allme n ts of p r i n c 1pa l and i nterest shall be
due and pay ab le on or b e for e Jan uar y l , 1970, and the remainder
of said in s ta l lme n ts shall b e due a n d payabl e successively on
or before the 1st day o f Ja nu a r y, i n each y ear thereafter, until
said principal and intere st ar e pai d in full. Failure to pay
any installment, whether of principal or interest, when due shall
cause the whole of the unpaid principal to become due and payable
immediately, and the whole amount of the unpaid principal and
accrued interest shall thereafter draw interest at the rate of
one per centum (1 pet.) per month, or fraction of a month, until
the date of tax sale, as by law provided, but at any time prior
to the date of the sale, any owner may pay the amount of all
unpaid installments with interest at one per centum (1 pet.)
per month, or fraction of a month, upon all delinquent install-
ments, and all penalties accrued, and shall thereupon be restored
to the right thereafter to pay in installments in the same manner
as if default had not been suffered. The owner of any property
not in default as to any installment or payment ma y , at any
time, pay the whole of the unpaid principal with accrued inte r e st
to the date of the next assessment installment payment dat e .
Payments may be made to the City Treasurer at any time within
thirty days after the final publication of this Ordinance .
Immediately after the expiration of such thirty day period , said
assessments shall be certified to the county Treasurer of Arapahoe
County, Colorado, for collection, as provided by law.
Section 5. That if any one or more sections or parts
of this Ordinance shall be adjudged unenforceable or invalid,
such judgment shall not affect , impair or invalidate th e rema i ning
provisions of this Ordinance, it being the intention that t h e
various provisions hereof are severable.
Section 6. This Ordinance, after its final passage,
shall be r e corded in the City Ordinance Book kept for that
purpose, shall be authenticated by the signatures of the Mayor
and City Clerk, and shall be published in the ENGLEWOOD HERALD,
a newspaper of general circulation published in said City,
wi t hin s e ven day s after its final passage, and shall be and
r e mai n i rre pealable until the a ssessments hereby made shall be
paid in full.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reading
on t h e 1 7 t h day of February , 1969.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 20th day
o f February , 1969 .
Re ad by title and passed on final reading on the 3rd
day of March, 1969.
. , I !
.,.
I • •
f
-
•
•
Published as Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1969, on the
6th day of March, 1969.
(~ l-z~~
Mayor
Attest :
~~
I, Stephen A. Lyon do hereby certify that the above
and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of an Ordi-
nance passed on final reading on the 3rd day of March, 1969, and
published as Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1969, on the 6th day
of March, 1969.
Attest:
,~~
'I
I • •
. • I !
I
'r
• , -
-
-
f
0
•
I . .
•
. I ' •