The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1969-07-21 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet• - 0 - July 21, 1969, Regular City Council Meeting • • • • • COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO JULY 21, 1969 REGULAR MEETING: The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado, met in regular session on July 21, 1969, at 8:00 P.M. Mayor Schwab, presiding, called the meeting to order. The invocation was given by Reverend Jerry Springston of the First Christian Church. Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Schwab. The Mayor asked for roll call. Upon the call of the roll, the following were present: Schwab. councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Absent: Councilman Lay. The Mayor declared a quorum present. Also present were: Assistant City Manager Mack, City Attorney Criswell. • • • • • • COUNCILMAN DHORITY MOVED, COUNCILMAN BROWN SECONDED, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 7, 1969, AND THE SPECIAL MEETING OF JULY 14, 1969, BE APPROVED AS READ. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Schwab. Ayes: Councilmen Parkinson, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Nays: None. Abstain: Councilman Lone. Absent: Councilman Lay. The Mayor declared the motion carried. • • • • • • Mayor Schwab recognized the following citizens from the list of "Special Citizen Program Invitees": Mr. Graydon Ditty, 3158 South Fox Street. Mr. Ditty stated that there is a drainage problem in the alley by his property which is causing a contaminated water puddle to form after every rain. This could be avoided if the City would divert the flow of the water. Mr. Ditty stated that during flash floods the present storm drainage system is not adequate enough to carry the water and that the City should also solve this drain-age problem. I . • ·. .• I ! ' '!' • • Mayor Schwab also recognized Mrs. Barbara Burge t, 4108 South Inca, president of the Englewood Republican Wom e n's Club. Mrs. Burget requested th a t a specia~ election be held in January, 1970, in order to star t c onstruction on an adequate storm drain- age system for the City of Englewood. * * * * * * A memorandum from John A . Criswel l, City At t orney, dated July 18, 1969, rega r ding a special election to provide storm sewers was received f or the record. City Attorney Criswell stated that a special general obligation bond election, which mus t be separate and apart from all other e lections, could not be held b efore the next general munic i- pal election as the Charter states that a special election cannot be held earlier than 45 days a f ter a general election. Mr. Criswell stated that it would also take approximately 60 day s o r more to prepare the necessary documents for such an election. Mr. Criswell stated that the earliest date a special general obligation bond election could b e held would be in late December or mid-January , 1970. Mr. Criswell stated that the only action that could be taken right now would be to contact bond counsel to prepare a p roposed bond issue and time schedule for the City. Councilman Lone reported on the public meeting with residents of the City of Englewood to discuss the storm drainage program held Jul y 16, 1969. Councilman Lone stated that 34 res i - dents were in attendance and that they were more than ready to go ahead with a special bond election. Councilman Brown stated that the citizens would like City Council to t ake the necessary action so that a special election could be held in January, 1970. COUNCILMAN LONE MOVED, COUNCILMAN PARKINSON SECONDED , THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY BE INSTRUCTED TO PREPARE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO HOLD A GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND ISSUE SPECIAL ELECTION ON STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 15, 1970. City Attorney Criswell stated that because of the length of time the bonds would be called, their provisions, etc. th at bond counsel should be engaged without expenditure of mon ey to submit a proposal to the Council for the special election. COUNCILMAN LONE MOVED, COUNCILMAN PARKINSON SECONDED, THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS TO PROVIDE CITY COUNCIL WITH A PROPOSAL TO ALLOW THE CITY COUNCIL TO PLACE A SPECIAL GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND ISSUE ELECTION, THAT THIS INFORMA- TION BE RECEIVED BEFORE A FINAL DECISION IS MADE, AND THAT BOND COUNSEL BE RETAINED. Discussion ensued. Mayor Schwab stated that the special election could be further discussed at the study session , Monday , July 28, 1969. Upon the cal l of the roll on the second motion, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Counci lmen Parkinson, Lone, Kreiling, Dhority , Brown, Schwab. Nays: None. Abs ent : Councilman Lay. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * -2- • . , I • • .• I ! ' ' '!' • • The minutes of the Water and Sewer Board meeting of July 14, 1969, were received for the record with four memoranda attached. Mr. J. Robert Mack, Assistant City Manager, appeared before City Council and discussed the acquisition of the Denver City Ditch. Mr. Mack stated that the action recommended by the Water and Sewer Board on the acquisition of Denver City Ditch h ad been taken at the July 14, 1969, special City Council meeting. Mr. J. Robert Mack, Assistant City Manager, reappeared before City Council and discussed Supplement No. 15 to the Connector's Agreement with the Valley Sanitation District to provide transmission of sewage from Centennial Park. Mr. Mack stated that Supplement No. 15 should be accompanied by a written statement for Valley Sanitation District. Such statement should declare that the City will protect and maintain the sewer lines during construction of Centennial Park. COUNCILMAN PARKINSON MOVED, COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED, THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE SUPPLEMENT NO. 15 TO THE CONNECTOR'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AND VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT TO PROVIDE TRANSMISSION OF SEWAGE FROM CENTENNIAL PARK AND THAT A WRITTEN STATEMENT BE GIVEN THE VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT ASSURING THAT THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD WILL PROTECT AND MAINTAIN THE SEWER LINES DURING CONSTRUCTION OF CENTENNIAL PARK. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Nays: None. Absent: Councilman Lay. The Mayor declared the motion carried. Mr. J. Robert Mack, Assistant City Manager, reappeared before City Council and explained the Water and Sewer Board's request that a letter of intent be provided to Mortgage Resources, Inc. assuring them of the City's intent to provide service to Valley Vi ew Heights Subdivision through the Valley Sanitation District. Mr. Mack stated that the Valley Sanitation District has given assurances that they could adequately handle this additional service . COUNCILMAN DHORITY MOVED, COUNCILMAN BROWN SECONDED, THAT A LETTER OF INTENT BE WRITTEN TO MORTGAGE RESOURCES, INC. ASSURING THEM THAT THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD WILL PROVIDE SEWAGE TREATMENT SERVICE TO VALLEY VIEW HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION THROUGH THE VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Nays: None. Absent: Councilman Lay. Th e Mayor declared the motion carried. Mr. J. Robert Mack, Assistant City Manager, reappeared before City Council and discussed the recommendation of the Water ,_ and Sewer Board that a letter of intent be provided Wright-McLaughlin Engineers assuring them that the City will provide sanitary sewer -3- • I I • • ·' \ ! I 'r 1-- • • • • service to a 100-acre site in Cherry Hills under certain condi- tions. Mr. Mack stated that the request includes St. Mary's School and a maximum of 80 residential taps. Mr. Mack stated that this area may form a new water and sanitation district which would construct a 6 -inch main westerly on Quincy to an Englewood sewer west of South Clarkson and an aeration holding plant. This plant would hold all sewage until there was a light flow period on the Englewood system, and then the Englewood s y stem would carry the sewage in the early morning hours. Councilman Lone stated that the City should seriously review Cherry Hills' plans to form a new water and sanitation district and whether or not the City would have to enlarge its sewer lines. Discussion ensued. COUNCILMAN DHORITY MOVED, COUNCILMAN KREILING SECONDED, THAT A LETTER OF INTENT BE WRITTEN TO WRIGHT-MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERS ASSURING THEM THAT THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD WILL PROVIDE SERVICE TO A 100-ACRE SITE IN CHERRY HILLS UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS AS OUTLINED BY THE WATER AND SEWER BOARD. Upon the call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Nays: Councilmen Parkinson, Lone. Absent: Councilman Lay. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * The minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of June 17, 1969 were received for the record. * * * * * * A memorandum from the Planning and Zoning Commission recommending the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan was received for the record. City Attorney Criswell stated that this Comprehensive Plan was not a workable program or an application for Federal funds but a master plan which is called for by the Charter and the statutes of the State of Colorado outlining certain goals of the City. Mr. Criswell stated that before final approval and adoption of the plan that the Council should review the correspond- ing maps which c ompose a significant portion of the plan. Councilman Parkinson requested that the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan be placed on the agenda for the next regular City Council meeting and that the Councilmen review the maps which are on file in the Planning Department. Mayor Schwab stated that the maps could be reviewed at the study session . * * ~ * * * A letter from Ken R. White Company regarding the schedule for construction of a Servicenter was received for the record. * * * * * * The City Manager's Quarterly Report was received for the record. * * * * * * -4- I • • . , ·' I ! ' ~ • • The minutes of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals meeting of May 28 , 1969, were received for the record. * * * * * * BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. 28, SERIES OF 1969 AN ORDINANCE CREATING AND ESTABLISHING AN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, TO BE KNOWN AS SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 69; ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION THEREIN OF SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS TO BID UPON THE CON- STRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS. (Cop~ed in full in the official Ordinance Book.) COUNCILMAN LONE MOVED , MAYOR SCHWAB SECONDED, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 28 , SERIES OF 1969, BE PASSED ON FINAL READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL IN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD AND ENTER- PRISE. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows : Ayes: Councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Kreiling, Dhor ity, Brown, Schwab. Nays: None. Absent: Councilman Lay. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * City Attorney Criswell presented an easement agreement between the City of Englewood and South Clarkson Company for a 22 foot sanitary sewer easement between Clarkson and Washington and Jefferson and Kenyon. COUNCILMAN LONE MOVED , COUNCILMAN PARKINSON SECONDED , THAT THE EASEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AND SOUTH CLARKSON COMPANY BE APPROVED AND THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows : Ayes: Councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Nays: None. Absent: Councilman Lay. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * City Attorney Criswell presented a bill for an ordinance approving an expend~ture of $3,928.77 to repair a leak in a 16- ,_ inch sewer line. Mr. Criswell stated that the City Charter provides that compet~t~ve bids shall be received for capital improvements over $1,000; but s~nce the original repairs were to be less than $900, no compet~tive bids were received. Mr. Criswell stated that because bids were not received that passage of the bill for an ordinance authoriz~ng payment of the repair costs was necessary. Mr. J. Robert Mack, Assistant City Manager, appeared before City Council and stated that the original repair work included T.V. inspection and grouting of the 16-inch sewer line. -5- I • • \ ! I 'T • • Mr. Mack stated that this was unsuccessful because it was dis- covered there was a 24-inch pipe lying on top of the 16-inch sewer line. This pipe did not allow the grouting to ~ork. Introduced as a Bill by Councilman Parkinson and read in full, A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND RATIFYING THE PERFORMANCE BY GUILDNER WATER AND SEWER COMPANY, BY DANA KEPNER AND BY WINSLOW CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF CERTAIN PUBLIC WORK WITHOUT THE RECEIPT OF COMPETITIVE BIDS THEREFOR AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO PAY THE SUMS OF $935 .00 TO GUILDNER WATER AND SEWER COMPANY , $640.05 TO DANA KEPNER AND $2,353.72 TO WINSLOW CON- STRUCTION COMPANY. COUNCILMAN PARKINSON MOVED, COUNCILMAN KREILING SECONDED, THAT THE BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE BE PASSED ON FIRST READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL IN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD AND ENTERPRISE. Discussion ensued. At the conclusion of discussion it was the consensus of Council th at prior to passage of the Bill for an Ordinance the repair bills be checked to see if the charges for the work are accurat e and just., COUNCILMAN PARKINSON MOVED, COUNCILMAN LONE SECONDED, THAT THE BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE BE TABLED. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Nays: None. Absent: councilman Lay. The Mayor declared the motion c arr ied. * * * * * * City Attorney Criswell read a decision from the Colorado Public Utilities Commission dated July 14, 1969, concerning the application of the Denver Tramway Corporation for authority to increase certain fares and for other relief including discontinu- ance of Route 31 to Westminster. Mr. Criswell stated that as a result of this decision, the adult fare on the Englewood rout e was increased to 35 cents and that the route had not been changed. * * * * * * City Attorney Criswell stated that the responsibilities of the City 's legal department have increase considerably and that it has become impossible for him to adequately attend to his private and public law practice. Mr. Criswell stated that because of this increase he regretfully resigns his position as City Attorney in order to maintain a private practice. Mr. Criswell stated that he would like to b e relieved of his responsibilities as City Attorney as soon as conveniently possible but no later than November l, 1969 . Mayor Schwab expressed the City's and Council's appreci- ation to City Attorney Criswell for the service he has given to the City of Englewood. Councilman Kreiling stated that an informal committee be established to screen the applicants for the position of City Attorney. * * * * * * -6- . , I • • f • • • • A memorandum from Stanley H. Dial, City Manager, regarding a study of traffic patterns was received for the record. * * * * * * Assis t a n t City Manager Mack stated that a national flood insuranc e program using Federal funds which provided reduced rates through private insurance c ompanies based upon locality could b e available to Englewood residents owning one to four housing units. Mr. Mack stated that to qualif y and establish this i nsurance program by June 30, 1970, the City would likely have to : 1. Adopt a flood-zoning plan. 2. Guide development away from flood areas. 3. Assist in reducing flood damage b y such means as a storm sewer program. 4. Revise the Building Code to provide for flood prevention construction. 5. Give assurance that the City is working towards these goals. Councilman Parkinson stated that this matter should be referred to the Planning Commission. * * * * * * Councilman Parkinson stated that Municipal Court Judge Haydn A. Swearingen was in need of an assistant. Councilman Parkinson requested that Mr. Richard L. Eason of Simon, Eason, Hoyt & Malone, 3311 South Broadway, be appointed Assistant Municipal Court Judge. COUNCILMAN PARKINSON MOVED, COUNCILMAN KREILING SECONDED , THAT RICHARD L. EASON OF SIMON, EASON, HOYT & MALONE , 3311 SOUTH BROADWAY, BE APPOINTED ASSISTANT MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE . Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Parkinson, Kreiling, Lone, Dhority, Brown, Schwab . Nays: None. Absent: Councilman Lay. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * COUNCILMAN LONE MOVED, COUNCILMAN BROWN SECONDED , THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: · Ayes : Councilmen Parkinson, Lone, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, S c hwab. Nays: None. Absent: Councilman Lay. The Mayor declared the motion carried and the meeting adjourned at 10:40 P .M . I • • 0, I I I , .,. • • AGENDA FOR REGULAR COUNC IL SESSION JULY 21 , 1969 8:00 P.M. Call to order, invocation by t he Rev. Jerry Springston of the First Christian Church, pledge of allegiance led by Boy Scout Troop No . 92, a nd roll call. l. Minutes. (a) Regular meeting of July 7, 1969 (Copies transmitted herewith.) (b) Special meeting of July 14, 1969. (Copies transmitted herewith.) 2. Pre-scheduled citizens and visitors. (a) Memorandum from Mr. John Criswell, City Attorney, regarding a special election to provide storm sewers. (Copies transmitted herewith. ) (b) Minutes of the Water and Sewer Board meeting of July 14, 1969. (Copies transmitted herewith.) I. Memorandum recommending the acquisition of the Denver City Ditch. 2. Memorandum recommending approval of Supplement No. 15 with the Valley Sanitation District to provide service to Centennial Park. 3. Memorandum recommending a letter be pro- vided Mortgage Resources , Inc. assuring the City's intent to provide service to Valley View Hdghts Subdivision through the Valley Sanitation District. 4. Memorandum recommending a letter be pro- vided Wright-McLaughl in Engineers assuring the City's intent to provide service to a 100-acre site in Cherry Hills under certain conditions. (c) Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of June 17, 1969. (Copies transmitted herewith.) (d) Memorandum from the Planning and Zoning Commission recommending the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. (Copies transmitted herewith.) --> , ---e.-----:"' (e) Letter from Ken R. White Company regarding the schedule for construction of a Servicenter. (Copies transmitted herewith .) (f) City Manager's Quarterly Repor • (Cop1es transmitted herewith.) (g) Minutes of the Board of Adjustment. and Appeals meeting of May 28, 1969. (Copies transmitted herewith.) (Continued) I • • • • AGENDA FOR REGULAR COUNCIL SESSION JULY 21, 1969 Page 2 4. City Attorney. (a) Ordinance on final reading creating sidewalk Imorovement District No. 69 . (Copi es p reviously transmit t e d.) (b) Attorney's Choice. 5. City Manager. (a) Memorandum from stanley H. Dial, City Manager, regarding a study of traffic patterns. (Copies transmitted herewith.) (b) Report on repairs to a sewer line at the sewage treatment plant. (c) Manager's Choice. 6. Recognition of non-scheduled citizens and visitors. 7. General discussion. (a) Mayor's Choice. (b) Councilman's Choice. 8 . Adjournment. STANLEY H. DIAL City Manager SHD/mm >- ~~~ ·~ ((Q ' ~ Lc ' I • • . . \ I . , I f 'T • • • • INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUN CILMAN BY AUTH ORITY ORD INANCE NO. Q? .S , SERIES OF 1969 F/lt:: 00, COLQ, AN RDINANCE CREATING AND ESTABLISHING AN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, TO BE KNOWN AS SIDE WALK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 69; ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION THEREIN OF SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS TO BID UPON THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS . WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colo- rado, pursuant to the Charter and Ordinance No . 14, Series of 1965, of said City and the Laws of the State of Colorado, hereby finds and determines that there exists a necessity for the creation of Sidewalk Improvement District No . 69, in said City, and the construct ion therein of sidewalk im p rovements, as described herein; and liHEREA S, the City Council has heretofore directed the Director of Public Works to prepare, plans, specifications, ma ps and schedules in accordance with said laws; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has prepared all the maps and certificates of his survey, as well as schedules, plans, specifications, approximations of cost, and all other matters and things in complete form and substance as require d by law; and \iHE REAS, the said maps and certificates of his survey, as well as schedules, plans, specifications, approximations of cost, and all other matters are hereby approved and adopted by the City Council ; and WHEREAS, Notice of a public hearing concerning the crea - tion of the District and the construction of the improvements therein and upon this ordinance has been published once a wee k for three weeks in the Englewood Herald, a news p aper of ge neral circulation in the City, and, in addit ion, a copy of the Notice has been mailed, pos tage prepared, to each known owner of real property within the proposed District ; and \iHEREAS, at the time and place specified in said otice, the City Council met in open session for the purpose of hear - ing any objections or protests that might be made against said improvements; and WHEREAS, all objections and complaints having been duly heard and considered, the Council has determined that such objections should be denied except as this ordinance has acce p ted them and incorporayed herein changes in said J istrict based upon said objections . N , THERE FORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY CO UN CIL F THE CITY OF ENGLEwOOD, COLORAD , as follows: Section 1 . Sidewalk Improvement District No . 6 9 is hereby created and the improvements hereinafter described, consist ing of c ertain sidewalk improvements, are duly ordered after Notice duly g iven and Hearing duly held, all as required by la\-J . Section 2. The extent of the Di strict to be assessed for he cost of the improvements shall be all the real pro perty I . • ' • • • specially benefited and as more p articularly set forth in the Notice of Hearing as provided by a Resolution of the City Council passed and adopted on the 2d day of June, 1969 . The kind of improvements and the sidewalks on \vhich such improve - ments shall be as follows: 1 . Necessary installation, removal and replacement of concrete sidewalks, curb and gutter, together with there appurtenances and incidenta l s, in the Cit y's right-of-way contiguous to the following properties. LOCATION 2700 block of South Acoma St. 2800 block of South Acoma St. 2900 block of South Acoma St. 3000 block of South Acoma St. 3000 block of South Bannock St. LOTS 1-24 25-48 1 -24 25-48 1 -24 25-48 1 -24 25-48 1 -24 25-48 BLOCK SUBDIVISION 9 Idlewild 10 Idlewild 1 6 Idlewild 15 Idlewild 1 7 Speers Broadway Addition 18 Speers Broadway Addition 24 Speers Broadway Addition 23 S peers Broadway Addition 23 Speers Broadway Addition 22 Speers Broadway Addition 3100 block of 1 -24 3 Hee 's Addition South Cherokee St. 3 -12 Henry Addition and that part of the NE 1/4 SW 1/4 Sec- tion 34 T4S, R68W of the 6th P .M. described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south line of West artmouth Avenue 16 6.3 feet east of the west line of said NE 1 /4 S 1/4, thence east 125 feet to the west line of South Cherokee Street; thence south along said west line 100 feet; thence west along the north line of Lot 3, Henry Addition 125 feet to a point; thence north 100 feet to the p oint of beginning. Section 3 . Said District shall be known as the same is hereby designated "Sidewalk Improvement istrict No. 69", in Englewood, Colorado. ,._ Section 4. The construction of said sidewalk improvements in and for said District, as shown by the p lans, specifications and ma p s thereof, prepared by the irector of Public lolo rks and approved by the City Council of the City of Englewood and now on file in the office of the Director of Public 1-lorks, be and the same is hereby authorized and orde red, the material to be used in the construction of said street improvements to be in accordance with such ma p s, plans and specifications . Section 5 . The estimated total cost of said improvements is $17,222.98; it is proposed that the City of Englewood will pay a p proximately $1,852.32 toward the total cost of said im- provements . The balance of the total probable cost (being approximately $15,370.66) is to be pa id by special assessments to be levied upon each parcel of the real property hereinabove described . The approximate share of the total cost to be assessed per front foot upon any lot or tract of land fronting or abutting -2- I . • \ ( I ' 'r - • • on said improvements is set f orth in the Notice of Hearing, as provided by a Resolution adopted and passed by the City Council on the 2d day of June, and is : Vertical curb and g utter 3.38 p er lin. f t. Side\valk (4" thick) .83 per sq. ft . Driveway (6 " th i ck) 1.05 per sq. f t. Remo val of old sidewalks . 23 per sq. ft . Removal of old vertical curb and gutter .83 p er lin. ft. Saw concrete 2 .63 per lin. ft. Section 6. All assessments levied against the aforesaid parcels of real property will be due and payable, without demand, within thirty days from and after the final publ ications of an ordinance assessing the costs of said improvements against the real property in the district. In case any o\Yller of real property shall fail to pay whole of such assessment against his property within said thirty days, then , the pro rata cost of said improvements so assessed against his property, together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum on any unpaid balance, shall be payable in five equa l annual ins tal lmen ts. The first of such installments of princi pal and interest shall be due and payable at such time as may be determined in and by the asses- sing ordinance, and the rema inder of said installments shal l be due and payable successively on the same day of each year thereafter, until all are paid in full. Section 7. The Mayor and Direct or of Finance are hereby authorized to advertise for bids to construct such improve- ments in three (3) consecutive weekly issues of the Englewood Herald, a newspaper of general circulation publi shed in the City of Englewood, which advertisements may run concurrently 'o~ith the publication of this Ordinance. Section 8 . The City Council hereby finds and determines that the im provements pro p osed to be constructed and installed will confer a special benefit upon the property within the District and a general benefit upon the Cit y as a whole. Section 9. All ordinances, or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. This Ordinance, after its fina l passage, shall be recorded in a book kept for that purpose, shall be authenticated by the signatures of the Mayor and Director of Finance, shal l be published in said City. Introduced, rea d i full and p assed on first reading on the '/' day of '.Y<· I' 1 , 19 69. ? 7 Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the /c day of July, 1969. Read by title and passed on final reading on the ~~~ day of July, 1969 . )',I-'( I l Publish~d by ~~tle as Ordinance No. ;, Series of 1969, on the day of Ju ly , 1 969. ~ /4~~!y/e4~~ I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the above and fore- going is a true, accurate and complete copy passed on final reading and published by title as Series o f 1969. Attest: . ' I • • .• \ ! ' - • • CITy O INTRODU CE D AS A BILL BY C UN CILMA N BY AUTH ORIT Y ORDI ANCE NO. .-..' J , SERIE S OF 1969 AN RiHNAN CE CREATING AND ESTABLISHING AN I MPROVEMENT DISTRICT, TO BE KN WN AS SIDE WALK IMPROVEMENT DI STRICT NO. 69 ; ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTIO N THEREIN OF SIDEI'IALK IMP ROVEMENTS ; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS TO BID UPON THE CON STRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, the City Counci l o f the City of Englewood, Colo - rado, pursuant to the Charter and Ordinance No . 14, Series of 1965, of said City and the Laws of the State o f Colorado, hereby finds and determines that there exists a necessity for the creation of Sidewalk Improvement District No . 69, in said City, and the construction therein of sidewalk im provements, as described herein; and WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore directed the Director of Public Works to prepare, plans , specifications, ma p s and schedules in accordance with said laws; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has pre pared all the maps and certificates of his survey, as well as schedules, plans, specifications, approximations of cost, and all other matters and things in complete form and substance as require d by law; and WHEREAS, the said maps and certificates of his survey, as well as schedules, plans, specifications, approximations of cost, and all other matters are hereby approved and adopted by the City Council; and ~ WHEREAS, Notice of a public hearing concernin g the crea- tion of the District and the construction of the imp rovements therein and upon this ordinance has been published once a week for three weeks in the Englewo od Herald, a news paper of g eneral circulation in the City, and, in addition , a copy o f the Notice has been mailed, postage prepared, to each known owne r of real property within the proposed District; and \mEREAS, at. the time and place specifie d in s a id otice, the City Council met in open session for the pu rpose of hear- ing any objections or protests that might be ma de against said improvements; and WHEREAS, all objections and complaints having been duly heard and considered, the Council has dete rmined that such objections should be denied except as th is o r d inance has ac cepted them and incorporayed he r in changes in said J istrict based upon s aid o bjec tio ns. r lJ , 1HE REF ORE, BE lT ORDAI~'ED BY THE CIT · C U CIL F THE CI1~ F ENGLEwOOD, COL ORAD , as follows: Section 1 . Sidewalk Imp r ovemen t istrict ~o . 6 is here by created and the improvements here"nafter J scr ibed, consisting of c ertain sidewa l k imp r o vements, are dul) o rdered after Notice duly g iven and Hearing dul y held, all as required hy law . Section 2 . The extent of the ist rict to be assessed for the cost of the imp"rovemen t s shall be all th r a 1 pr operty • ,_ -----·------ I \ , ' • • ·pec ia . 'Y benefi te d and as mo re particu la r ly s et fo rth in the ~o tice of Hearin g as provid d by a Resolu tion of the City Co uncil passe d and adop ted o n th 2• d a y of June, 196 9. The kind of lm~Jro vements and the sidewa lks on \oJh i ch &uch improve- ments shall be as f ollows: l . Neces sary instal l ation, remova l a n d re placement o concrete s idewalks, curb and g utter, toge her with there appurtenan ces and i ncidentals , in the Cit y 's right-of-way c ontig u ous t o t he f ol lowing .r op rties . LO CA TIO 2700 bloc k o f South Acoma St. 280 block o f Sou th Acom a S t. 2900 b lock o f S01.1th A ·om a St. 3 00 0 bloc k of South Ac oma St. 3000 b lock of South Bannock St. 3 10 0 block of South Cherokee St. LOTS BLOCK SUBDIVISI N 1-24 9 Idlewild 25 -48 10 Id l ewild l -24 16 Idlewild 25 -48 15 Idlewild 1-24 1 7 Spee rs Broa dwa y Ad dition 25-48 18 S peers Br oadwa y Addition 1 -24 24 S pe ers Broadwa y Addition 25 -4 8 23 Speer s Broadwa y Addition l -24 23 S pe er s Br o adway Addition 25-4 8 22 Sp e ers Broa dway Addition l -24 3 Hee 's Addition 3 -12 Henr y Addition and that part of the NE 1/l, SW 1/Lt Sec- tion 34 T4 S , R6 8W o f the 6th P .M. described as foll o ws : Be g inning at a poin t on the s o uth line of West Dartmou th Aven ue 16 6.3 feet east of the west lin e of said NE l /4 SW 1 /4 , t hence east 1 2 f e e t to the west line of South Cherokee Street; thence south along said west line 1 00 feet; t hence west along the north line o f Lot 3, Henry Addit ion 125 feet to a po int; thence n orth 10 0 feet to the po int o f beginning . Section 3. Sa id District shall be kn o ~1 as the same is hereby designated "Sidewalk Im pr o vem e nt u istrict No . 69 ", in Eng l ewood, Colorado. Section 4. The construction of said sidewalk imp rovements in and for said District, as shown b y t h e plan s, specific ations and ma ps thereof, prepare d by the Direc t or of Public works and ap proved by the City Counci l o f the City of En gl woo d a n d now on file in the of fice o f the Director of Public Wor ks, be and th e s a me is here by autho rized and o rdered , the ma t eria l t o be used i n t he construction of said stre et impr o vements to be in accorda nce wit h su ch ma p s, plans and specifications . Section 5. The estimated t o ta l cost of said improv ements is $1 7 ,222.98 ; it is p r o~Jos ed t h a t th Cit y o En g lewood wi ll pay approximate ly $1 , 52.32 toward th t tal cost o f said im- provement s . 1h balanc of the t otal ~r obab le cos t (b ing approximately $15,3 70 .66) is t b paid b specia l ass essnents to be l evied upon each par el of th r al pr op erty herei na bove described. Th e approximate ha re of th t o tal cos t to be assess ed per front foot upon any lo t or tract of l..m d fro nting or abu t ing -2- I ' • • on s a id improvement s is s et fo rth in the ~o tice o f Hearing , as prov ided b y a Resolution ad o pted and pas s ed by the City Cou ncil on the 2d da y of June, and i s · Vertica l curb and gut ter 3 .38 .J er lin . ft . S lde1valk (4" thick) .83 per sq. ft . Driveway (6 " thick ) 1.05 per s q. ft. Removal of old sidewa lks .23 per sq . f t. Re moval of old vertical curb and g utter .83 per l in . ft. Sa w concrete 2 .63 per l in. f t. Section 6. All assessment s levied a g ainst the a foresa id parce lS of real pro perty \vi ll be due and payable I WithOUt deman d, within thirt y da ys from and aft er t he f ina l publications of an ordinance asses sing the costs of said imp r ovements against the real property in the dis trict . In case an y owner o f real property shall fail to pay wh ole of s uch assessment against his propert y within said thirty days , then , the pro rata cost of said improvements so asses sed against his property, together with interest a t the rat e of 6% per annum on an y unpaid ba l ance, shall be paya ble in five e qua l a nnua l i nstallments. The first of such i nsta llments of principal and interest s ha ll be due a nd pay able at such time as ma y be determined in and by the asses- sing o rdinance, and the rema inder of s a id insta llments shal l b e due and payable successively on the same day of e ach ye ar thereafter, until all ar e paid in full. Section 7. Th e May o r and Direct o r of Financ e are hereby authorized to advertise for bids t o construct suc h improve- ments in three (3) consecutive wee kly issues of the En gle woo d Hera l d , a newspape r of general circu l ati on pub lished in t he Cit y of En g lewood, which advertisements may ru n conc urrently with the pub l icati on of this Ordinance. Section 8. The City Counc il hereby f inds and dete r mines that the im provements pr op osed t o be constructed and insta lled wi ll confer a specia l benefit u pon the pro ert y '"ithin the District and a g eneral bene fit upon the Cit y as a wh ole . Section 9. Al l ordina nc es, or parts thereof in conf lict herewith are hereby re peale d . This Ordinance, a fte r its f ina l passag e , shall be recorded in a book kep for t h at purpose, sha ll be authenticat ed by the sig natures o f the Nayor and Director of Finance, s ha ll be published in said Cit y. Introduced, read in f u ll an d pa s se d on first r eading on the ,. day of \... 1969. Published as a Bi ll for an v rdinanc e n the Jul y, 19 69 . Rea d by title and passed o n final rea ding on t h e day of July, 1969. (' . ' day o f ;- Published by "tit le as Ordinanc No. Se rie s of 1969, o n the day of July, 1969. At t st: 'hayor l City Clerk-Tre asurer I , Steph n A . Lyon, do hereb certif, that th abov and fore - going is a true accurat and complete co~y of an Crd ina nce passed on final reading and published ~l eas Ord inance .o . Series of 1969. Attest : City a surer . ' I • f • ... AN DI&NCK .APPI.CNIIG .AB I.ATlftliQ TliE PERFOIMAIICI IIY GUII.DtmR WATER AND SEWER COMPANY, BY llAMA OPNBI. AIID IY WillS LOW COMSTI.UC- TION COHPARY or CERTAIN PUBLIC WO&l W1THOUT 1'18 DCIIPT OF COM- PETITIVE liDS TtEREFOR AND At.n'HORIZIMC Tilt DIRECTOR OF FIMANC! TO PA"t TB IUMI or $93S.OO 'lO CWI~ '.Mftll Aim SKWa CQHPANY , $640.0 5 T O MilA KBPRIR AND ~2.353. 72 TO WDISLOW CotCSTI.UCTI O CO. WII&U.AS, s .. uoa 116 of' tbe Claarter of t• City of Eql.e- vood providea that no oapital iaprOftllent, coetin& in uceaa of $1,000.00 , aball be contrectecl for, ucept upon tbe baaia of apecificatioaa properly aubaitted and approved for which coaapetitiw bicla have bean aclvertiaad for and received, ucept that llban Council ct... the .... expedient, contrecta for pub- lic vorka or iaprovaMnta mal ba neaotiated, prOYided that con- tract• for vbich no caapatit va bida have been raqueated aball be l.Dvalicl unla .. accepted by orclinaace vbich aball declare the reaaon for exception to the co.patitive biddin& requirement, and WHEREAS, there recently wa f oua.cl to exiat a leak in one of the City' • aawr l inea of a natura vbich preaented a aerioua health probl-, and ___.WHEBI.AS, it .aa neceaaary to taka actioa to have thia cor- rected wltbill a period of tt. which allCNed neither for coaape- titiva b1cld1n&, nor for preparation of apacific written apac1 f1- cationa and Council approval tbenof, and lEAS, in tbia ~Y dtuatioe the D1J:Mtor of Utili- tie• autbort.aed the followlJI& partiea to perfon oertaia vork tbenoe beviq a value at aet forth below: and, Daoa ~pnar $640 . 05 Cuildner Water and s ... r Coapany 9 35.00 Winalow CoutructioD Cc.paay 2353.72 Total $3,928.77 WHEREAS, the .. tter oow bavin& Men fully preaented to Council! it ia Council 1 • intellt and deaire fully to apprOYe and rat t:y the authoriaation for the per.orunce of aaid work and to authorise the pa,..at of aaid au.. to aaicl p£rtiea. W~ THEREFORE, 8 IT OllDAU.D IY THE CITY COUNCIL at Till CITY r r;M;LEWOOD, COLORADO, aa follow: Section 1. For the raaaona ••t fortb herelubow, Council hereby detand .. a that there are &oocll auffioient and expedient reuona to have tba hereinebo¥e cleacr bed work perfon.d vitbout the receipt of coapet1t1va bida and Cowcil cloea beraby fully approve and ratify wltb tbe •-force aa if COUDCil bad or1&1nally approveA the •-· tbe oontraota for tbe perforuaae of auch work heretofore entered i.Dto by tbe Director of Utilitiea of thia City. Sectioa 2. Council hereby •tbort.aea aacl directa the Director of FiDaDCe to pay to the followlna partiea the followiq UIOUZita, vbich Couacil fiDda to be the r ... a.Ua yalue of tbe • I , ----____ . __ .-- I ' • • aenloee ad -~•rlala readend bJ Mid pmrtl• 1ll ~M per- fGD~DGe of tbe hereinbefore deNrf.Md eoatreou: • 640.05 93.5.00 23.53.72 'foUl $3921.77 lDtroduced, r 1ll tbe day of _____ _. Pvblf.abed ill full u • Bill for aa OIL'dtMMe on tbe day of , 1969. Mayor Attest : City Clerk-Trea s urer I, Stephen A. Lyon , do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, a c curate and complete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance introduced, read in full and passed on first reading on the day of , 1969. City Clerk-Treasurer • I . . -• OFFIC C CITY COU~ rJL_ ~:_?OCUM ENT COU NCIL i••L-J;,._, fiLE MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGAJUn.tJG:HMnWMtWlRo B>):COHIIIENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. DATE: July 17, 1969 SUBJECT: Approval and Adoption of the Comprehensive Plan . RECOMMENDATION: Parkinson moved: Lone seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council that the Comprehensive Plan, as submitted, be approved and adopted . The motion carried unanimously. • By Ord er of the City Planning and Zoning Commission. IUL 2 JIJII .:5r d) • I • • f - • • 0 - Law Offices . OF F ICIA L CITY COU ~CIL DOCUMENT rf ., ''1 '1 r JOHN A. CRISWELL Edward G. DonovtJn 3755 South Broadway Englewood. Colora d o 80110 Phone 761 -0800 ~· COUNC I L r .. c: ... , .:~G FILE C IT Y OF E N GL EWOOD. CO LO. July 18, 1969 To: Mayor, Councilmen and City Manager From: City Attorney Subject: General Obligation Bond Election Gentlemen: In view of the recent discussions relating to the possibili- ties of the issuance of general obligation bonds of the City to finance the construction of a storm drainage system, I have been requested to review the Constitutional and Charter provisions involving general obligation bond elections. Contained herein is a summary of those provisions. Article XX, Section 6 e of the Colorado Constitution gives to every home-rule city the right to regulate, conduct and con- trol the issuance of all kinds of municipal obligations. Pursuant to this authority, Article X, Section 104 of the Citt's Charter provides that general obligation bonds may only be ssued If: (a) The issuance is approved by a majority vote of the taxpaying electors voting thereon at a special election, and (b) The outstanding general obligation cannot exceed three percent (37.) of the total assessed valuation of the taxable property within the City. Section 14 of the Charter regulates all municipal elections and, insofar as the same Is applicable, provides that: (a) A general obliftation bond election must be a special election held separate and apart" from all other elections and only one proposition may be submitted; (b) Only one special election may be held each year, and (c) No special election may be held within the forty-five (45) days immediately preceding, or immediately following, a general state or municipal election. JUL 2 lJIIt . , ·' I ! 'r 0 ' - • • 0 - To Mayor, Councilmen and City Manager July 18, 1969 Page 3 vote in a revenue bond election to taxpaying electors, but had to allow non-taxpaying electors to vote in such elections. While my personal opinion is that that decision, and the doctrine enunciated therein, is inapplicable to general obli~ation bonds, I am quite certain that, due to the newness" of that de- cision, whatever bond counsel is engaged the City will want to review any proposed bond issue very care- fully in the light of that new Supreme Court decision. Al l this is to say, then, is that it appears to me th a t the possibility of holding a special election upon the proposition of the issuance of general obligation bonds to construct a storm drainage system prior to the next general municipal election is realistically impracticable, so that the earliest date that such an election could be held would be sometime in late December or mid-January. Like other bond issues, however, the bonds to be issued are ,_ not "marketable" unless an attorney who is recignized bond counsel issues an opinion approving all of the procedures engaged in issu- ing the bonds and all of the terms of the bonds themselves. As a re- sult, it has been the standard practice of this city, as well as all other cities, to engage such recognized bond counsel to actually prepare all of the necessary documents needed. Thus, while I can render general advice concerning the matter, such as I have done in this memorandum, the only advice which is of any great merit is the advice of the recognized bond counsel retained by the City. To this end, therefore, if counsel determines that serious consideration should be given to the calling of a special election upon the proposition of the issuance of general obliga- tion bonds, it would be my suggestion that Council authorize the City Manager to contact bond counsel and have bond counsel sub- mit to City Council at its next regular meeting, if possible, a detailed outline of the terms of a proposed bond issue, as well as a detailed time schedule in which the same could be accomplished. I • • ·' I ! ' f '! - • • 0 - To Mayor, Councilmen and City Manager July 18, 1969 Page 2 As a result of the above provisions,.therefore, and in view of the fact that a general municipal election is scheduled for the first week in November of this year, it is clear that: (a) The proposition of issuing general obligation bonds may not be .. >Le d up on nL the forthcoming general election, and (b) A special election could not be held between approxi- mately mid-October and the latter part of December, 1969. As can be seen, therefore, there are only approximately 80 days between this date and the last date upon which a special general obligation bond issue election could be held this year. As I have indicated to Council in the past, due to the "mechanics" of preparing for and holding any municipal election, it is well nigh impossible to have such an election held in a shorter period of time than 60 days from the date that Council decides to have an election held. In the case of a general ob- ligation bond election, however, the time that it takes to pre- pare the various documents can be expected to be even greater than 60 days for two principal reasons: (a) In the first place, aside from the documents calling the election and the documents needed to be prepared to give notice of the election, etc., involved in the actual mechanics of the election itself, in the case of a general obligation bond election it is necessary to engage bond counsel to prepare rather detailed documents relating to the terms of the bonds proposed to be issued themselves prior to the time that an election may be called. I have attempted to ascertain from the bond counsel normally used by the City the length of time that these preliminary matters might take but have been unable to reach him. I would estimate, however, that if all such documents could be prepared within a period of 30 days after Council had made all necessary decisions relating thereto, we would probably be breaking the "track record" for lawyers. (b) Secondly, on June 16, 1969, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of CiSriano v. Cita of Houma, 89 Sup. Ct. 1897, in which tat Court bel that a city could not constitutionally limit the right to ,. . . ' \ ! 'r ' - • • • • 0 - To Mayor, Coun~·ilmen and City Manager July 18, 1969 Page 2 As a result of the above provisions, therefore, and in view of the fact that a general municipal election is scheduled for the first week in November of this year, it is clear that: (a) The propositi on of issuing general obligation bonds may not be ·· , I up on fll the forthcoming general election, and (b) A special election could not be held between approxi- mately mid-October and the latter part of December, 1969. As can be seen, therefore, there are only approximately 80 days between this date and the last date upon which a special general obligation bond issue election could be held this year. As I have indicated to Council in the past, due to the "mechanics" of preparing for and holding any municipal election, it is well nigh impossible to have such an election held in a shorter period of time than 60 days from the date that Council decides to have an election held. In the case of a general ob- ligation bond election, however, the time that it takes to pre- pare the various documents can be expected to be even greater than 60 days for two principal reasons: (a) In the first place, aside from the documents calling the election and the documents needed to be prepared to give notice of the election, etc., involved in the actual mechanics of the election itself, in the case of a general obligation bond election it is necessary to engage bond counsel to prepare rather detailed documents relating to the terms of the bonds proposed to be issued themselves prior to the time that an election may be called, I have attempted to ascertain from the bond counsel normally used by the City the length of time that the se preliminary matters might take but have been unable to reach him. I would estimate , however, that if all such documents could be prepared within a period of 30 days after Council had made all necessary decisions relating thereto, we would probably be breaking the "track record" for lawyers. (b) Secondly, on June 16, 1969, the United States Su preme Court decided the case of CiKriano v. Cita of Houma, 89 Sup. Ct. 1897, in which tat Court bel that a city could not constitutionally limit the right to • ,_ I \ ! I ' '\' .. • • COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO JULY 14, 1969 SPECIAL MEETING: The City Council of the City of County, State of Colorado, met in special 14, 1969, at 7:30 P.M. Clerk: The following "Notice of Call" was read by the City July 14, 1969 NOTICE OF CALL BY THE MAYOR FOR SPECIAL SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, JULY 14, 1969 --7:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado, is hereby called to a special meeting in the City Hall, 3400 South Elati Street , for the consideration and possible actions on a Bill for an Ordinance pertaining to the sale of City property at McLellan Reservoir and other Utilities Department matters. J. ROBERT MACK Acting City Manager JRM/ij ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT OF NOTICE The following persons, all Councilmen of the City of Englewood, Colorado, do hereby acknowledge receipt of Notice of the above special session: /s/ John J. Lay /s/ Elmer E. Schwab /s/ D. J. Dhority /s/ John Kreiling /s/ Howard R. Brown /s/ Louis Parkinson Notice was given to the following Councilman who was not in attendance: Councilman Lone ,._ Mayor Schwab, presiding, called the meeting to order and asked for roll call. Upon the call of the roll, the following were present: Councilmen Lay, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Absent: Councilmen Parkinson, Lone. The Mayor declared a quorum present. Also present were: City Manager Dial, Assistant City Manager Mack, City Attorney Criswell, City Clerk Lyon. t{ ,) . ' I • • • • 1"- BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. 27, SERI ES OF 1969 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD T O EXECUTE A DEED TO A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND PRESENTLY OWNED BY THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD CONVEY ING SAID LAND TO THE GATES RUB BER COMPANY , A COLORADO CORPORATION , AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY . (Copied in full in the official Ordinance Book.) COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED, COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 27 , SERIES OF 1969 BE PASSED ON FINAL READING AND PUBLISHED IN FULL IN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD AND ENTERPRISE. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows : Ayes: Councilmen Lay, Kreiling , Dhority , Brown, Schwab. Nays: None. Absent : Councilmen Parkinson, Lone. The Mayor declared the motion carried. Mayor Schwab stated th a t at an earlier i nformal meet ing between the Englewood Water Board and the City Council, the Englewood Water Board had recommended that a contract with the Denver Water Board be executed whereby Englewood would obtain all rights to the City Ditch from its headgate in Douglas County to the interception of the City Ditch at Harvard Gulch near Yale and Downing. Englewood would agre e to deliver up to November 1 , 1973, 12 cubic feet of water per second at the Harvard Gulch blowoff. Englewood and the Denver Water Board would jointly attempt to obtain all other water rights on the City Ditch. However, Engl ew ood would be allowed to retain water rights equal to no more than 2.5 cubic feet per second. (Councilman Parkinson entered the Council Chambers at 7:40 P.M. and took his seat with Council.) City Manager Dial stated that over a ten ye ar period it was estimated that approximately $30 ,000 net savings would be obtained by using the City Ditch to prov~de water to the Allen Filter Plant rather than pumping up from the Platte River at the Union Avenue station. Mayor Schwab stated that the take over of the City D~ ch by the City of Englewood had been tied into the negotiat ions between the Denver Water Board and Englewood for the West Slope Water Development Project. Discussion ensued. COUNCILMAN DHORI TY MOVED , COUN CILMAN LAY SECONDED , THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE PROPOSED AGREEMENT WHEREBY THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD WOULD ASSUME ALL RIGHTS TO THE CITY DITCH UP TO THE INTERCEPTION OF 'IHE CITY DITCH WITH HARVARD GULCH . Councilman Parkinson stated that he believed the City should agree only in principle at this time in stead of specifically authorizing the Ma yor and City Clerk to execute the agreement. -2- • I ·' I I '! I • • , • • City Attorney Criswell stated th a t it probably would be best to have an ordinance passed at the time of finalization of the agreement which would incorporate all aspects of the agreement therein. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows : Ayes: Councilmen Parkinson, Lay , Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Nays: None. Absent : Councilman Lone. The Mayor declared the motion carried . COUNCILMAN DHORITY MOVED, COUNCILMAN KREILING SECONDED, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Parkinson, Lay, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Nays: None. Absent: Councilman Lone . The Mayor declared the motion carried and the meeting adjourned at 7:50 P.M. I • • • • COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO JULY 7, 1969 JUL 21 'G9 COU NCIL I•' -- .Cl't'( OF ENG ~'-"-' if G FILE: -E:Woo o, C OLO. REGULAR MEETING: The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado, met in regular session on July 7, 1969, at 8:00 P.M. Mayor Schwab, presiding, called the meeting to order. The invocation was given by Reverend Jerry Springston of the First Christian Church. Pledge of Allegiance was led by Boy Scout Troop No. 92. The Mayor asked for roll call. Upon the call of the roll, the following were present: Councilmen Lone, Lay, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Absent: councilman Parkinson. The Mayor declared a quorum present. Also present were: City Manager Dial, Assistant City Manager Mack, Assistant City Attorney Donovan, City Clerk Lyon. * * * * * * COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED, COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 16 AND THE SPECIAL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 1969, BE APPROVED AS READ. Councilman Kreiling stated that the minutes should be clarified concerning the Lease and Option Agreement for the Oliner property, 35-3600 block of South Elati, for the police- fire headquarters that the $2.50 per square foot option price contained within the lease is reasonable and acceptable. City Manager Dial stated that comparative prices of other tracts of land in the adjacent area were made and that the $2.50 per foot purchase price was most reasonable. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Lone, Lay, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Nays: None. Absent: Councilman Parkinson. The Ma y or d ec lared the motion carri ed. * * * * * * Mayor S c hwab rec ognized the following citizens from the list of "Special Citizen Program Invitees": Mr. H. E. Hash b e rger, 3 8 5 9 South Fox Street. I • • . ~ \ ! f • Mr. Hashberger stated that he had received a notice to repair the sidewalk in front of h is property , and he inquired of council why his next door neighbor whose sidewalk is in worse condition did not receive a notice. City Council discussed the matter . Ma y or Schwab stated that the administration would check into the situation. * * * * * * Mayor Schwab recognized the following Boy Scouts from Troop No. 333 and presented them and their troop a certific ate for their service to the City of Englewood: Jim Svigel Ga ry Du rbin Daniel Ma cPherson Richard Irwin Certificates were also presented t o Craig Frankowski and Rober t Hosanna who were not present . Mayor Schwab also recognized the parents of Richard Irwin. * * * * * * COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED, COUNCILMAN LONE SECONDED , THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE FORMATION OF SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 69 BE OPENED. Upon the c all of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes : councilmen Lone, Lay, Kreiling, Dh ority , Brown, Schwab. Nays: None. Absent: councilman Parkinson. The Mayor declared the moti on carried and the publi c hea ring open a t 8:20 P .M. (Note: A tape recording of the public hearing is on file with the official records.) Listed below are those individuals who appeared before city council: Mr. Stanley H. Dial, City Manager. Mr. Victor N. J a cobsen, 2742 South Acoma. Mr. Kells Waggoner, Director of Pub lic Works. Mr. John D. Denn i ng, 3168 South Cherokee. Mrs. Yurk, 3046 South Acoma . Mr. H. E . Hashberger, 3859 South Fox Street. CO UNCILMAN LAY MOVED, COUNCILMAN BROWN SECONDED, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows : Ayes: Councilmen Lone, Lay , Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. -2-I • • ·. •' \ / I '!' • ~~--------------------------------• Nays : None. Absent : councilman Parkinson. Th e Mayor declared the motion carried and the public hearing c losed at 8 :50 P.M . * " * '#<-* The minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of May 20, 1969 , were received for the record. * * * * * * The minutes of the Water and Sewer Board meeting of June 17 , 1969 , were received for the record with two memoranda attached. Mr. J. Robert Mack , Assistant Ci t y Manager, appeared before City council and briefly discussed the recommended inclusion of additional land within the Sou h Arapahoe Sanitation District. COUNCILMAN KREILING MOVED , COUNCILMAN LAY SECONDED, THAT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER BOARD REGARDING INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL LAND INTO SOUTH ARAPAHOE SANITATION DISTRICT BE APPROVED AND THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMEN TS. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Lone, Lay, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Nays : None. Absent: Councilman Parkinson. The Mayor declared the motion carried. Mr. J. Robert Mack, Assistant City Manager, reappeared before City council and presented a map showing the area recom- mended for exclusion from the Southgate Sanitation District. Mr. Mack stated that the property was owned by Humble Oil Company and it had been determined that subJect property would be better served by the Castlewood Sanitation District. Mr. Mack stated that the subject property had originally been included in the Southgate San itation District in October 1968. COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN KREILING SECONDED, THAT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER BOARD REGARDING EXCLUSION OF LAND FROM THE SOUTHGATE SANITATION DISTRICT BE APPROVED AND THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes : counc ilmen Lone , Lay , Kreil i ng, Dhority, Brown, S c hwab. Nays: None. Absent : Counci lman Park i nson. The Mayor dec lared the mo t ion c arr~ed. -3- I • • •' \ ! I .,. • • A memorandum from Stephen A. Lyon, Director of Finance, regarding tax certificates held by the City for which no owner could be found was received for the record. Mr. Stephen A . Lyon, Director of Finance, appeared before city council and presented a map designating the locations of the three parcels which are the subject of his June 25, 1969, memorandum. COUNCILMAN DHORITY MOVED, COUNCILMAN LONE SECONDED, THAT THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE BE AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR TAX TITLE TO THOSE PARCELS FOR WHICH NO OWNER OF RECORD COULD BE DETERMINED OR LOCATED. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows : Ayes: councilmen Lone, Lay, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Nays: None. Absent: councilman Parkinson. The Mayor declared the motion c arried. * * * * * * A letter from the Honorable Haydn A. Swearingen, Municipal Court Judge, regarding the North American Judges' Associ- ation conference was received for the record. COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED, COUNCILMAN LONE SECONDED, THAT THE OUT-OF-STATE TRIP OF HAYDN A. SWEARINGEN, MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE, TO THE NORTH AMERICAN JUDGES' ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE IN SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA , NOVEMBER 30 THROUGH DECEMBER 6, 1969, BE AUTHORIZED AT A COST OF $420. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Lone, Lay, Kreiling, Dhor ity , Brown, Schwab. Nays: None. Absent : Councilman Parkinson. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * Election precinct maps for the 1969 election adopted by the Election Commission on June 10, 1969, were received for the record. * * * * * * The minutes of the Board of Career Service Commissioners meeting of June 23, 1969, were received for the record. * * * * * The minutes of the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of June 11, 1969, were received for the record. * * * * * * -4-I • • ·. ·' I ! • I • • The minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of May 27 , 1969 , were received f or the record. * + * * + * A memorandum from the Planning and Zoning Commission recommending South Santa Fe Lane be renamed South Windermere was received for the record. City Manager Dial presented a map showing the route of South Santa Fe Lane which is recommended to be renamed South Windermere. Mr. Dial stated t hat portions of South Santa Fe Lane either fronted on or were in the boundary of the corporate e ntities of Littleton and Sherid an and the County of Arapahoe. It was the consensus of City Council that prior to the a ction being taken on the renaming of South Santa Fe Lane to South Windermere that the staff make cont a ct with the other political jurisdictions to inform them of the City's i n tent . * * + * * * BY AUTHORITY ORDINAN CE NO . 24, SERIES OF 1969 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 5 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , BY AMENDING SECTION 2 5 .1 THEREOF AND BY ADDING A NEW SECTION TO BE KNOWN AS SECTION 25.2-7, TO AUTHORIZE VEHICLES TO MAKE RIGHT HAND TURNS ON STEADY RED LIGHTS , AFTER COMING TO A COMPLETE STOP, EXCEPT AT INTERSECTIONS WHERE SUCH TURNS MAY BE SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED. (Copied in full in the of ficial Ordinance Book .) COUNCILMAN DHOR ITY MOVED , COUNCIL MAN BROWN SECONDED, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 24, SERIES OF 1969, BE PAS SED ON FINAL READING AND ORDERED PUBLIS HED BY TITLE IN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD AND ENTER- PRISE. Upo n the call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Cou n cilmen Lone, L a y, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Na ys : None . Absent: Councilman Parkinson. The Mayor decl ared the motion c arr ied . ~ * * + + BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. 25, SERIES OF 1969 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ~16.5-20 b) OF THE MUNICIPAL CO DE OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT TO BE DEPOSITED UPON APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT , AS SECURITY FOR PAYMENT OF THE TAX LEVIED BY §16.5-17 FROM TWO PER CENT (2 %) OF FORTY PER CENT (4 0%) OF THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE IMPROVEMENT OR OF THE TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE TO TWO PER CENT (2%) OF FIFTY PER CENT (SO%) OF THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE IMPROVEMENT OR OF THE TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE. -5-I • • f - • • ,_ (Copied i n full in the offici al Ordinance Book.) COUNCILMAN BROWN MOVED , COUNCILMAN LONE SECONDED, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 25, SERIES OF 1969 , BE PASSED ON FINAL READING AND ORDERED PUBL ISHED BY TITLE IN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD AND ENTER- PRISE. Upon the call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows : Schwab. Ayes : Counc i lmen Lone , Lay , Kreiling, Dhority , Brown, Nays: None. Absent : Counci lman Park i nson. The Mayor declared the motion c arr ied. t-* * "' * * BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. 26 , SERIES OF 1969 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTIONS 6.1 THROUGH AND INCLUDING 6.6-15, 6.7-7 THROUGH AND INCLUDING 6.7-9, 6.7-29 AND 6.7 -30 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, TOGETHER WITH ANY OTHER ORDINANCE INCONSISTENT HEREWITH , AND ADDING TO CHAPTER 6 OF THE MUNIC I PAL CO DE OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD NEW SECTIONS 6.1-l THROUGH AND I NCL UD ING 6.3-9 TO PROVIDE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND ADMINISTRATI ON OF A CAREER SERVICE SYSTEM , AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A PERSONNEL DIRECTOR , RECORDING SECRETARY AND OTHER NECESSARY CLERICAL EMPLOYEES BY THE CITY MANAGER TO AID THE BOARD OF CAREER SERVICE COMMISSIONERS IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES HEREUNDER AND TO PERFORM SUCH OTHER DUTIES AS ARE NOT INCONSISTENT THEREWITH. (Copied in full in the official Ordinance Book.) COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED, COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 26, SERIES OF 1969, BE PASSED ON FINAL READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED BY TITLE IN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD AND ENTERPRISE. Mayor Schwab stated that he had received a letter from the Englewood Firefighters ' Assoc iation dated July 4, 1969 . (Note: The letter is copied i n full in the official mi nutes.) Mr. Bob Marshall , president of the Englewood Firefighters ' Association, appeared before City Council and discussed the letter and the proposed action of placing the Personnel Director under the City Manager. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Schwab. Ayes: Councilmen Lone , Lay , Kre ili ng, Dhority, Brown , Nays : None. Absent: Coun cilman Park~nson . The Mayor declared the motion c arried . + + -6-I • • - • • A repor t regarding emergency services pension plan was receive d f o r the record. Introduced as a B ~ll by Counc ilman Lay and read in full, A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE CREATING AND ESTABLISHING AN I MPROVEMENT DISTRICT, TO BE KNOWN AS SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 69; ORDERING THE CONS TRUCT I ON THEREIN OF SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE TO CONTRACTS TO BID UP ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS . COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN LONE SECONDED, THAT THE PROPOSED BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE BE PASSED ON FIRST READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED IN FULL IN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD AND ENTER- PRISE. Upon the call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows : Schwab. Ayes: Councilmen Lone , Lay , Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Nays: None . Abs e nt : Councilman Parkinson. The Mayor declared the motion c a rried. * * * * * Introduced as a Bill by Counc ilman Lay and read in full , A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD TO EXECUTE A DEED TO A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND PRESENTLY OWNED BY THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD CON- VEYING SAID LAND TO THE GATES RUBBER COMPANY , A COLORADO COR- PORATION , AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED , THAT THE PROPOSED BILL FOR AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE BE PASSED ON F IRS T READING . Upon the call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows: S c hwab. Ayes: Councilmen Lone, Lay, Kreiling , Dhority , Brown, Nays: None. Absent: Counc ilman Pa.rkinson. The Ma yor d ec lared the mot ~on c arried. City Ma nage r D1 a l s a ted that the C1 ty o f Englewoo d wou ld recei v e $222,000 f r om the s a le o f McLellan Reservoir property t o Ga es Rubb e r Com p an y . Assistant C~ty Attorney Do novan reported that a hearing on a c ontempt c itati on brought agai ns t Mr. Robert E. Moo dy, 2352 Wes t Harvard , for h i s fa~lure t o comply with the Englewood Hous i ng Co de would be h e ld o n July 30 , 1 9 6 9. * + + -7- . ' I ! ~ I • • - • • Director of Public Works Wa ggoner stated that the cleaning up of che K1ngsley property , 2350 South Tejon, would be start ed July 7 , 1969 ,_ City Manag er Dial reported th a t an am endat ory contract had been r eceived from the Depa rtment of Housing and Urban De v e lopme n t which i ncorporated the new l o c a tion of Centennial Park. Mr. Di al stated that in a ddition t o approving the Centenni al Park site , the Depar tment of Housing and Urban De velopment reduced the present contract from $2 8 2,000 to $277,360, an amount of $4,640 repr esenting approximately $9,000 of development costs. Mr. Dial also indicated th at the Department of Housing and Urban Deve lopment was reviewing whether i t could participate in the $500 cost of a cqu1ri ng County property. Mr . Dial stated that the loss on a cquisition should the Department of Housing and Urb an Development r efuse to p art1 cipate on a cquisition of the County p roperty would be more th an $250 in grant money as that portion of the park development of the County property might become ineligible . The a ctual reduction mi ght approximate $3 ,500 in gr a nt mo n ey. City Manager Dial indic ated that although Mr. Lyon and Mr . Romans wished to make a concerted attempt to have the c ontrac t r estored to $282,000 it was his opin i on that the chan ces of getting this amount restored were rather slim and that the construction of the site wo uld be d e layed until 1970 if the City of Englewood did not p a ss a resolut i on authorizing executi on o f the contract document within a short period of time. Mr. Di al recommended passage of a resoluti on authorizing execution of the contra ct with a separ a te motion d i rect i ng the City Manager to attempt to have the funds restored wh ich were cut from the con- tract . RESOLUTION NO . 25, SERIES OF 1969 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND PROVIDING FOR EXECUTION OF PROPOSED SECOND AMENDATORY CONTRACT AMEND ING CONT RACT FOR OPEN- SPACE PURPOSES BETWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Copied i n full i n the off1cial Resolution Book .) COUNCILMAN LONE MOVE D , COUNCILMAN LAY SECONDED , THAT RESOLUTION NO. 2 5, SERIES OF 1969 BE ADOPTED AND APPROVED , Upon the call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows : Schwab. Ayes: Councilmen Lone, Lay, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Nays : None. Absent: Counc i lman Parkinson . The Mayo r declared the mo i on carri ed . COUNC I LMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED , THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE DIRECTED TO ATTEMP T TO CAUS E TH E DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT TO RESTORE THE $4 ,640 OF FUNDS WHICH HAD BEEN RED UC ED BY THE OPEN-SPACE AMENDATORY CONTRAC T APPROVED BY RESOLUT ION NO. 25 , SER I ES OF 1969. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as fol lows · -8- \ ! 'r I • • r - - • • • • Ayes : Councilmen Lone , Lay , Kre i l i ng , Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Nays: None. Absent : Councilman Parkinson. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * ~ ... City Manager Dial s tated that for a number of years sani- tary sewer lines had been crossing private property on the south- west corner of Clarkson and U .S. 285. During the con struction of the medical building by J. B. Moorman Construction Company th e fact th at no e as ement for sewer l ines was in effect was brought to the City of Englewood 's attention. Mr . Dial presented an ease- ment a greement between the City of Englewo od and South Clarkson Company and requested authori zation for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement. COUNCILMAN LONE MOVED , COUNC I LMA N KREILING SECONDED , THAT THE EASEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AND SOUTH CLARKSON COMPANY BE APPROVED AND THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows : Ayes: Counc ilmen Lone , Lay, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Nays: None. Absent : Councilman Parkinson. The Mayor declared the motion c arr ied . City Manager Di al reported brie fly that he was in receipt of a letter from Mr. J. M. Ne wland , 3595 South Cherokee, requesting that the City of Englewood establish dog license fees sufficiently high to cause the owners of dogs to be aware of their responsibilities. Mr. Dial read various exc erpts of the letter. It was the consensus of Counc i l that the admi n istra tion look into the matter of establishing dog l icense fees and report back. * * * * * * * + City Manager Dial presented a copy of the first edition of the Englewood Municipal Reporter . Mr. Di al stated that this internal municipal newspaper was designed to keep employees informed of various happenings wi th1n the City of Englewood and that initia.lly the publication would be quarterly . C1ty Manager Dial s t ated that the protest of Mr . Howard Abbott for the estate of Russell Abbott concern1ng Paving D1strict No . 17 had been on the basis that he subject property had been assessed the cost of curb , gutter and sidewalk in a previous paving district . Mr . D1al stated that a review of the City 's records -9- .. • \ ! '! I • • • • had indicated no suc h ass e ssmen t . However, Mr . Abbott and Mr . M. 0. Shivers , at t orn e y , we re o f t he opin ion that the property had been assessed b y Pavi ng District No. 3, a district which was created either before or d uri ng the depression years . Mr. Dial stated that he would have add ~t i onal details at the next City Council meet i ng or at a study sess i on . City Manager Di al requested that a study session be established for July 14 , 1969. Mayor Schwab dec lared that such a session would be es tab li shed. Mayor Schwab announced that the ground breaking for the Craig Rehabilitation Center would take place on July 11, 1969 . * * * * * * Councilman Lone stated that there would b e a public meeting of the Storm S ewer Committee in the Community Room, July 18, 1969, at 8:00 P.M. and requested th a t all those intere sted in the storm sewer situation to attend. * * * * * * City Council discussed the procurement of Federal a id through the State of Colorado for the new police-fire headquarters. City Manager Di al stated that the matter was currently under investigation and also called Counc il 's attention to the fact that the City of Englewood recei ved , i ndirectly, Federal aid through the State operated and Federally supported Colorado Law Enforcement Training Academy through which all Englewood officers have received course work . * * * * * * Ci ty Council discussed various i tems to be brought up at th e July 14, 1969 study session. * COUNCILMAN LONE MOVED, COUNCILMAN LAY SECONDED, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. Upon the c all of the roll , the vote result e d a s follows : Ayes : Councilmen Lone , Lay, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, S c hwab. Nays: None. Abs en t : Counci lman Park i n son . The Mayor d ec lare d t he mo tion c ar r~ed a nd th e meet ing ad j ourned a t 1 0:35 P .M. I • • . , . \ I I 'r -• 0 • "SPECIAL CITIZEN PROORAM INVITEES" -July 21, 1969 Precinct No. 1 -Mr. and Mrs. Daniel B. Gance, 1909 West Iliff Avenue Precinct No. 2 -Mr. and Mrs. L. H. Diltz, 2871 South Delaware Street Precinct No. 3 -Mr. and Mrs. K. C. Roberts, 2747 South Emerson Street ~Precinct No. 4 -Mr . ...JWI'l ttrl": Graydon Ditty, 3158 South Fox Street Precinct No. 5 -Mr. and Mrs. Ben D. Baca, 3319 South Grant Street Precinct No. 6 -Mr. and Mrs. Arlon Greenlee, 3488 South Clarkson Street Precinct No. 7 -Mr. and Mrs. John H. Roehling, 3477 South Marion Street Precinct No. 8 -Mr. and Mrs. Donald Watson, 2238 East Floyd Avenue Precinct No. 9 -Mr. and Mrs. J. R. Maulis, 3821 South Fox Street Precinct No. 10 -Mr. and Mrs. Leland C. Bacus, 4060 South Grant Street Precinct No. 11 -Mr. and Mrs. Myron W. Black, 4260 South Pennsylvania Street Precinct No. 12 -Mr. and Mrs. N. R. Eichhorn, 4101 South Inca Street Preci nct No. 13 -Mr. and Mrs. Joe E. Soxman, 4541 South Pearl Street Pre ci n c t No. 14 -Mr. and Mrs. Elvin P. Klein, 4762 South Grant Street Pre ci n c t No. 15 -Mr. and Mrs. Leon Henson, 5010 South Fox Street P reci n ct No . 1 6 -Mr . and Mr s . Will i am Lyons , 3327 West Chenango Avenue • . • \ ! 'r I • • • • NAME Mrs. Sh erra n P e nn e ta Mr s. Be t ty Wa s ki e wi c Mr . Garr y S . Waski e wi c Miss Be v e rl y Exn e r Ar t hur L Ma iso n ,Joe Jacobs W. Burd ette P owe ll Sh ei l a Go mes Mrs . R icha r d Kopp Ed Snow Bill Me u nier Mrs . J . A . T ieri Mrs. W. H . Stobau g h Mrs . J . N . Job Mari e O 'Br ie n • 0 - PUBLIC MEETING STORM DRAINAGE PROGRAM CITY OF ENGLEWOOD ENGLEWOOD CITY HALL July 16, 1969 8:00 P.M. Iren e M. Kay Barbar a Bu rget Arthu r E. Qu i n n P e t e r Ro s e n d a l e Earl J . Lammers Aus t in T . Go mes Dor i s We lls Mr . and Mrs . G . Va n Stee n wyk Mr . Victor F . Boog Wi ll iam H. Tri gg s Co n rad R . Stroh Et h e l Stroh L ola Aust i n Jessi e We lls Mrs V rd n Wig htman Mrs . Harr y Barre tt Mrs . Coy Horto n R i c hard P . Kopp Me lli e Bak r ADDRESS 3323 South Ogd e n Street 3324 South Ogden Str ee t 3324 South Og d e n Street 6451 South Marion Stree t 4354 South Jason Stree t 2895 South Corona Street 2896 South Corona Stree t 3170 South Humboldt Str ee t 3161 South Humboldt Street 3160 south Humbold t Stre et 3195 South Franklin Street 4318 South Jason Str ee t 4306 South Jason Str ee t 3200 South Gilpin Stree t 3750 South Clarkson Street 3 750 South Clarkson Stree t 4108 South Inca Str eet 3 170 South Franklin Str ee t 3185 South Franklin S tree t 3180 South Humboldt Str e et 3 170 South Humboldt Street 2882 South Corona Stree t 2875 South Downing Str ee t 2865 South Downing S tre et 43 00 South Jason Str ee t 2 886 South Corona Stree t 2 8 8 6 Sou t h Co rona Stre e t 2885 S outh Co r ona Street 28 8 2 South Corona S treet 3185 South Gi lpin S tr e et 3190 South F ra nk lin Street 1695 East Eastma n Av e nu e 3 161 South Hum b o ld t Str et 33 4 2 South Og d n Str et . , I I '! I • • ' • • • REGULAR MEETING ENGlEWOOD WATER AND SE)JER BOARD - Th meeting wa s c al led to order by Ch airman Frantz a t u ~lO P.M. Mr. Frantz exp l a ined that this regular monthly mee ting, normally held at 5:00 P.M. on the th rd Tuesday of each month , had been scheduled for t his time i n order that City Co uncilme n present could further disc u ss cert a in matters of business, handl ed in ~ s mee t ng1 t an nformal meeti ng of City Counc i l s cheduled later in the evening. All C~ty Coun cilmen had been advise d of this meeting and were invited to attend. Members Present : Members Ab sent: Other Ci ty Offi cials Present : Brownewell, Frantz, Kre i ling, Oliner1 Robohm, Sc hwab Lay City Councilmen Brown and Parkinson, City Manager Dial, C1ty Attorney Crisswell, Utilities Direc tor Carroll and Water and Sewer Board Leg a Consu ltant Shivers. (Sen. Note : Water and Sewer Boa r d Members Kreiling and Schwab are also membe r s of City Council.) Mr . M. o. Sh1vers, Jr., Legal Consultant, presented a draft agreement c on cern ng u s1t1on o f the Denver City Ditch for use by the City of Englewood. The agreemen t basically called f or Englewood to assume operation of the ditch in 1970 1 and to supply wa t er , through same, to Denver for a period of three years thereafter 1 'llhereupon ownership of the ditch u d r est with Englewood. Dis cussion ensued as to certain aspects of the d1tch operat on and how the di tch could favo r ably be used in the City's long range water distribu t ion and pump ng pl an s, f rom the headgate as far north as the Allen F lter Plan t; a nd for storm drainage from the Allen F l ter Plant northward throughout the C ty to Harvard Gulch i n Denve r . Mr. Sh1vers indicated that the Denver Water Board desired to consumate thi s agreeme nt con- cur rently with the negoti ations between Englewood, Denver and AMAX conc erning AMAX par c i - pat on n Wes t Slope water development. He also stated that there were a few sma 1 language changes to be made i n the agreement which would not affect the fUndamen tal aspe cts agreed u pon. ~ese involved such things as the correct amoun t of water r i ghts in the ditch and some mi nor language mod i fications. Mr. Shivers advised that the Denver Board of Water Comm1ssioners des i red an indicat1on f rom the City of Englewood, as to its intent in entering into the agreement, by 8 :30 A.M., J u .y 15, 1969. Af ter dis cuss on, 01 ner moved, Robohm, seconded, That the Water and Sever Board recommend to City Council that t he agreement for the acquisition of the Denver C ty D tch, by the City of Englewo od, as di scussed and as wi l l be mod i fie d through negoti ations handled by Mr. M. o. Sh i vers, Jr ., Leg al Consu tant, b e ap proved and exe c uted. Ayes : N ys ~ Absent : Brovnewell1 Fran t~, Kre i l i ng, Oliner, Schwab None Lay Mr. Brown and Mr . Park1nson, the o ther two Ci ty Councilmen present, i nd c ated that they c on- c urred 1n the a ct on of the Englewood Water and Sever Board. Mr . Carro 1, Utilit1 es Director, pres ented the following correspondenc e relati ve to co nnec- tlon of f a cil t as of the nev C ty-owned Centennial Park, near West Union Avenue and So uth Fed er Blvd. to the sewer line of the Valley San i tati on Distri c t. JUL 2 1 1969 3(b) • I • • •• ' r I 'T • • -2 .. "C ITY OF ENGlEWOOD Parks and Re creati on Dept, )uOO So , Elati Street Englewood, Colorado 80110 March 6, 1969 Valley San itation Distri ct P. o. Box 67 Littleton, Colorado 80120 Gentlemen : The City of Englewood plans to start development of Centennial Park, located near West Union and South Federal, this spring, Sewer service will be needed for the shelter house which will contain rest rooms and a concession stand, I wo uld l i .\ce to request an esti mated cost to the City to conne c t on to the Valley Sanitation District line in that area as i ndi cated by the enclosed plan, Since we plan to award construction contracts w1 thin the next few weeks, I would appreciate a reply as soon as possible, er enc, Si ncerely, /S/ ERNEST P, ROMANS, Dir, Parks & Recreation cc: City Manager Dial" "VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT P. 0, Box 67 Littleton, Colorado 80120 April 9, 1969 Mr. Ernest P, Romans, Director Parks & Recreation P . 0. Box 178 Englewood, Colorado 80110 Dear Mr, Romans : The Board of Directors received your request for information on co st of tapping our facilities in the vicinity of proposed Centennial Park, The Board cannot a ct on yo ur r equest until certain ac tions, as shown b elow, have be en co mp leted, The area you propose to serve is not within the boundary of this District, therefore the serv1 ce would have to be either through annex- ation of the area to the lhstric t or through contract between the Dis- trict and the City, Prior to entering negotiations on any contract, you or t he City should provide the Board w1 th the following in!onution : 1 , A letter from Dale H. Rea, D:l.s tr ct 's Engineer, i ndicating the capacity s available in the main line for your pro- pcsed connections , This letter should &leo i ndi cate the number of equivalent house taps involved in the co nnections. 2 , Official approval of the City o f Englewood to uend the Connector 1 s Agreemen t t o nclude the park area, i nc luding I • • . ' 0 \ t • • -3 - statement of intention on service by contract or by annex- ation. 3. A committment from the City to protec t the 18" sewer line, during and after construction, including the adjustment of all manholes to pro per grades for mai ntenance and provision for locki ng covers on manholes if vandali sm becomes a problem. We wish to advise that 250 LF of sewer line between Union and proposed sledding area was crushed once in pas t years when heavy equ i pment was work - ing in the area. Other sections of the line are shallo w enough so that danger of crushing a line is present. When letting contracts, potential bidders should be advised to avoid operation heavy equipment over the sewer line as much as possible. Upon receipt of proper information the Board will act promptly in order no t to de lay your construction schedule. JRB/nid" Sincerely yours, VALLEY SANI TATION DISTRICT /S/ By: John R. Boggs, President "CITY OF ENGLEWOOD Parks and Recreation Dept. 3400 So. Elati Street Englewood, Colorado Bono April 22, 1969 Dale H. Rea, District Engineer Valley Sanitation District P. 0. Box 67 Littleton, Colorado 80120 Dear Dale: The City of Englewood has asked for a connection to the Valley Sani tation District sewer line for a shelter house building to be located in the nev Centennial Park, West Union and South Federal. Mr. John Boggs, President of the Distric t , has informed us that they will need a letter from you indicating the capacity available in the main line and the number of equivalent house taps involved in the connections. Since our park construction will begin soon, I would like to have a letter giving the above information as soon as possible. Please advise if there is any cost to the City for this information. Enclosed is a site plan for Centennial Park and other information pertinent to th i s request. If any additional i nformation is needed, please call 761-1140, ext. 26o. er Sincerely, /S! ERNEST P. ROMANS, Di rector Parks and Recreation enc. Site plan, information Sheet, letter from Mr. Boggs. cc : Mr. Dial, City Manager Mr. Carroll, Utilities Director Mr. Lyon, Finance Director" I • • .• I ! I ~ • -u - "INFORMATION ON CENTENNIAL PARK SHELTER HOUSE 1. Shelter house con t ains a concess1on and rest rooms. 2. The concession and rest rooms will open June 10, 1970 for the first time. Thereafter, the rest rooms will be opened April 15 to Labor nay annually and the concession will open June 10 and close Labor Day. 3. The rest room will have the following fixtures: Men -1 lavatory 1 urinal l water closet Women -1 lavatory 2 water closets The concession will have: 1 small lavatory 1 sink" "VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT P. 0. Box 67 Littleton, Colorado 80120 Mr. Charles B. Carroll, Jr. Director of Utilities 3400 s. Elati Englewood, Colorado 80110 Dear Mr. Carroll : June u, 1969 The Board of Directors has asked that your draft of Supplement No. 15 be returned for minor additions to comply with our letter to Mr. Romans dated April 9 1 1969. This concerns a conunittment by the City to provide protection for our sewer line, adjustment of manholes to proper grade, and provision for locking lids on manholes in the park area to prevent vandalism. The Board also wishes to advise that the standard tap fee vas raised to $300.00 per tap some time ago, and that fee is still in effect. The Board, howeTer, has agreed, in this instance, to allow the $200.00 per tap as ,shown in the Supplement. The Board has approved execution of the Supplement when the changes requested are added so there should be no reason to delay your construction schedule. Sincerely yours, VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT n d " /S/ By : John R. Boggs, President Mr. Carroll also presented the ong1nal and three cop es of the draft Suppll!lllent No. 15 to the Connector's Agree~~~ent between the City of Englewood and Valley San itation District, as vas returned by Mr. Boggs with h s letter of June 4, 1969. Mr . Carroll pointed ou that thls Suppl emental Agreement would provide for the are. involved to be served by the Valley Sanitat on District line on the basis of an original tap fee of $200.00 per tap and an annual maintenance charge of $1.00 per month per tap, rather than by annexation to the Valley Sanitation District. • I • • .• I ( I 'r • • -5 - Mr . Dale Rea, District's Engineer, has reported verbally to the District's Board of Director 's that capacity is available i n the main line for the plroposed connectione, and will , no doubt, confirm same in a letter to Mr. Romans. After some chscus sion, Schwab moved, Brownewell, seconded, That the Water and Sewer Board recommend to City Council that Supplement No. 15 to the Connector's Agreement beween the City of Englewood and Valley Sanitation District, providing transmission of sewage from Centennial Park through the Ayes: Nays: Absent: lines of Valley Sanitation Dietrict, be approved and executed, as presented; and, that a written committment to the district be made by the City to protect the 18" sewer line, during and after construction, including the adjustment of all manholes to proper grades for maintenance and provision for locking covers on manholes if vandalism becomee a problem. Brownewell, Frantz, Kreiling, Oliner, Robohm, Schwab None Lay Mr. Carroll presented the following correspondence relative to proposed Englewood sewage treatment for 60 sewer taps in Valley View Heights Subdivieion, located within the boundaries of the City of Sheridan, through the sewer trunk system of Valley Sanitation District. • Englewood City Council 3400 South Elati Englewood, Colorado "Mortgage Resources, Inc. 106o Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80204 July 7, 1969 Attn: Mr. Charles B. Carroll, Jr. Dear Mr. Carroll: I am enclosing a plot plan and would like to request that the City Council approve 60 sewer tape for us in the Valley View Heights Subdivision per Englewood's Connector's Agreement with the Valley Sanitation District. The legal description of the area concerned is: Lots 1 through 20, Block 3, and Lots 4 through 19 and Lots 21 through 40, Block 2 Valley View Heights, Arapahoe County, State of Colorado. I have checked the n tes ve will need service to and would appreciate your assist~ce and consideration. WRF/mw encls: Respectfully, /S / Wm. R. Frasier, President "DAIE H. REA Consulting Engineer 2200 w. Chenango Littleton, Colorado 8ol20 • . , I • • ·' I ! • • -6 - J une 13 1 1969 Mr. J ohn Bo ggs, President Va l l ey Sanitation Distri ct P. o. Box 67 Little ton, Colorado 80120 Dear Mr. Boggs : In a ccordance with a request f r om Mo r tgate Reserve, we have ma de a study t o determi ne whe t he r or not there i s sufficient c a pa ci ty in a trunk l i ne s ew e r to a llow the addi tion of 60 new taps i n Valley View He ights Sub di vision. The connection of thi s line to the t runk l i ne would be Manhold 154 east of Federal on Tufts extended. We found adequate capacity in •he 8" line leading to the manhole and approximately the same capacity i n the 18" line as shown in our report dated September 1968. Therefore th ere is no problem of tap capaci t y except the problem called to your attenti on i n the above mentioned report which indicates where the 21" pipe enters the Englewood Sewage Treatment Plant the depth is 1 .47•. Si ncerely yours, /S/ Dale H. Rea, Consulting Engineer !JlR/erc c/c Mortgage Reserves" "CITY OF ENGLMX>D Of f i ce of Director of Utili ties 3400 So u th Elati Street Englewood, Colorado 80110 Wm. R. Frasier Mortgage Resour ces, Inc. 1060 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80204 Dear Mr. Frasier : July 11, 1969 I am i n rec eipt of your July 7 letter regarding 60 sever taps i n the Valley View Heights Subdivision. Afte r exam i ni ng t he drawings, etc I f~nd that there are several even ts wh ich must occur before Englewoo d c an a ccept the sub- division 's s ewa ge : 1 . Th e area is with i n Sheri dan, the r efore the Ci ty o f She r d an must conc ur i n wr iting to permit Englewood to pr oce s s the sewage. 2 . S ince the area i s not with i n the Englewood corporate boundary, one of two things mus t o ccur. Either a s anita tion d i stric t mu s t be formed to c ontract both ~th Val l ey Sanit a~io n and Englewood ; or you must pe t t on for annexa tion to the Valley Sam tation Di s t r ict. 3. Sub sequentl y t he Englewood City Council must execute I • • .• \ ! • - 7 - a s up plemen t to the Val e y San1tation agreement or execute a Valley Vi ew Heights co nne ctor 's agreement, wh icheve r is the course of act1on agreed upon. Before these matters have been r esolved, however, I shall en- deavor to obtain a statement of intent from the Englewood Wa ter Board ; and I w1ll transm it the dec ision to you next week. Respectfully, /S/ CHARlES B. CARROLL, JR . Director of Utilities CBC/ng" After co n siderabl e discussion, Kreiling mov ed, Schwab, s econded That the Wa ter and Sewer Board recommend to City Council that Mortgage Re sources, Inc., 1060 Bannock Street, Denver, Colorado, representing Vall ey View Heights Subd i v i s ion, be i mmediately given written assurance that the City of Englewood will provide Ayes : Nays: Absent : sewage treatment service to said subdivi sion subsequent to Valley View Heights• completition of successful negotiations with Valley Sanitation District, and receipt by the City of t ~~~l ewood of proper written authority from the City of Sheridan, ~rado. Brownevell, Frantz, Kreiling, Oliner, Robohm, Schwab None Lay Mr . Carroll presented the following letter from Mr. Ron ald C. McLaughlin of Wright- McLaughlin Engineers, under d ate of July 11, 1969 , pertaining to proposed Englewood sewage treatment service for an area approximately 100 acres in size i n t he v icinity of St. Mar y's School , south of East Quincy Avenue along the vest side of South Uni versity Blvd. • WWRIGH T~cLtUGHLIN EN GI NEERS Eng i neeri ng Consultants 2059 Bryant St reet Denver, Colorado 80211 ll July 1969 Mr . Ch arles B. Car roll , Jr ., Utilities Director City of Englewood 3400 South Elati Englewood, Colorado 80110 Dear Mr . Carroll: Th1s letter 1s wr itten with regard to obta1ning san1tary sever service for an area east of Englewood in acc ordance with our prev1ous co nference . Th e proposed service area (Water and San1tat on District) is shown on the attached sketch map . The area 1s approximately 100 acres bounded by Quincy on the north, Little Dry Creek on the vest and University on the east . The area includes land for develo pme t (at approxima tely one house per acre density.) The St . Mary's School and a few eX1s ing residences are also included. It is estimated that the area would have approximately 80 residential taps and the St . Mary's School . The estim ated average sewage flow at full density is 40 ,000 gallons per day. As you i nd icated, it lS apparent that the capac ties of the existing Englewood and the South Englewood Sanitation District 1 nes in this vicinity are marginal; there is probably little room for additional customers on a conventional basis. Therefore we are proposing a system which vas developed and used successfully • \ I '! I • ' • - 8 i n Aspen that should not place an additional load on either your lines or treat- ment plant, To construct and operate the water and sewer systems, it is planned to form a water and sanitation district, In order to form this district and partially finance the systems, it is necessary to obtain an agreement for services for sewage disposal, It is requested that the Englewood Water Board approve this service sub j ect to the condit ons listed below and furnish a "Letter of Intent" to serve , 1 . The propo sed district would construct a lift station i n the vicinity of L1ttle Dry Creek and Quincy Ave nue as shown, a 6-inch force main westerly on Quincy to an Englewood sewer west of South Clarkson, and an aerated holding reservoir of about 50 1 000 gallons. The district would be responsible for co mp lete operation of this facility. The holding reservoir would be designed to coll ect all waste flows through the day and peak period. The pumps would then operate by time clock during the low flow periods of the Englewood system, probably between 12 :30 a,m. and 6 :30 a,m. Thus, if the pumps were designed to empty the tank in a five-hour period, the maximum flow rate would be approxi- mately 165 gpm , which should not create a burden on the Englewood system. The waste would be aerated so that it would not be septic when discharged to the plant. 2 , The new district would agree to abandon the pump ing station if and when a suitable gravity trunk sewer is completed up Little Tiry Creek, 3. It would be i ntended that the commitment would be firm for 80 residential taps and the St. Mary• s School. If neighboring areas wish to add onto the system, this would only be done with City of Englewood permission, and the adding on would be subject to the new district's either constructing additional holding capacity or participating in increased line capacity downstream in the Englewood system. L. The cost to the new district would be the normal Englewood outside rate schedule. It is understood that the existing costs would include a tap fee of $75 per residence and an operating charge of $14 per year; however these are no ~ considered as fixed co sts but could vary if the Englewood standard rate structure varied, Please call if you feel further i nformation or discussion is necessary for the Board to reach a decision in this matter, Very truly yours WRIGHT-McLAUGHLIN ENGINEERS RCM:ej 11 /S/ By: Ronald c. McLaughlin --- Considerable discussion followed which again brought out the fact that the entire Cherry Hills Village-Greenwood Hills Village area should have mun icipal sewage treatment service; and that, during normal peak periods, the sewer lines within the City should not be subject to additional sewage from taps outs ide the City. Mr. Ca rroll stated that the proposal by Mr. McLaughlin calls for delivery of the sewagE' 11.t a manhole in East Quincy Avenue just vest of South Cl arkson Street and that an investigat1on by him had revealed that the City system could handle the addi t ional sewage from this area during the per od of time proposed in Mr, McLaugh in 's letter, The Water and Sewer Board membe rs present all 1ndicated that they felt the area in questi on would be better off f inancially and otherwise if they could become a part of a larger district providing sewage transmission all the way to the Englewood sewage treatment plant ; but, since there is apparently no interest currently in the formation of such a district, reluctantly agreed that the sub j e ct area should be served as pro posed, su bj ect to control of the delivery of sewage into the Englewood system at non-peak periods , and other stipulations, After discussion, • Brownewell moved, Schwab, s econded, That the Water and Sewer Board recommend to City Council that Wright ~ McLaughlin Engineers, be advi s ed that the City of Englewood will • \ ! 'f I • • f - Ayes : Nays: Absent : • -9 - enter into a connector's agreement, for sewage treatment service, with a legally fo rmed di stric t encompassing approximately 100 acres, generally described as being bounded by East Quincy Avenue on the north, Little Dry Creek on the west, South University Blvd. on the east and an east-west line approximately 1/2 mile south of St. Mary's School on the south, with the following prov1s ions to be considered for inclusion therein: 1. Term of Agreement. 2. Amount of tap fees. 3. Limitation on district by size of area or number of taps . 4. Restriction o~ time of day for delivery of sewage i nto the Englewood system. 5. Acknowledgement by this small district that, at such time as a large district is formed to serve the Cherry Hills Village and/or Greenwood Hills Vi llage area, with sewer trunk facilities contemplated which can physically serve thi s small district, this saall district will become an i ntegral part thereof; and sewage will no longer be acc epted into the Englewood systea from said small district in the vicinity of East Quincy Avenue and South Clarkson Street. 6. Others not enumerated. Brovnewell, Frantz, ltreiling, Oliner, Robohm, Schwab None Lay There being no further business to co-before the EnglEIIood Water and Sever Board, the meeting was adjourned at 6:10 P.M. Approved ________________________________ _ • I • • - Date : Sub j e ct: Recommendat i on : • • MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR REOOMMENDATION OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD July 14, 1969 Agreement For the Acquisition of the Denver Ci ty D tch That the agreement for the acqu i sition of the Denver City Ditch, by the City of Englewood, as discussed by the Englewood Water and Sewer Board and members of City Council, July 14, 1969, and as will be modified through negotiations handled by Mr. M. o. Shivers, Jr., Legal Consultant, be approved and executed. Respectfully submitted, EN GLF.\1001) WATER AND SEWER BOARD By : Robert F. Franta~ Chairman ~ I • • . • \ ! I . , ~ Date : Sub j e c t : Recommendation : • MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD July 14, 1969 Supplement No. 15 To Connector's Agreement With Valley Sani tati on District To Provide Transmission of Sewage From Centennial Park That Supplement No. 15 to the Connector's Agreement between the City of Englewood and Valley Sanitation District, providing transmissi on of sewage from Centennial Park through the lines of Valley Sanitation District, be approved and executed, as presented; and, that a written committment to the district be made by the City to protect the 18~ sewer line, during and after construction, including the ad- justment of all manholes to proper grades for maintenance and pro- vision for locking covers on manholes if vandalism becomes a problem. Respe ctfully submitted, By : Robert F. Frantz a rman . , •. I • • 'a - Date : SubJect : Recommendation: • • MEMORANDUM TO 1l!E ENGL&IOOD CITY OOUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR REcnoo;NDATION OF 1llE ENGlEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD July 14, 196 9 Proposed Sewage Treatment For Valley View He i ghts Subd i vision, Sher dan , Colorado That Mor tgage Resources, Inc., 1060 Bannock Street, Denver, Colorado, representi ng Valley View Heights Su bdivi s~o n , be immed i ately given written assurance that the City of Eng lewood Will provi de sewage treatment service to sai d subdivision subsequent to Valley Vi ew He i ghts • completion of successful negoti ations with Valley Sanitation Di stric 1 and receipt by the City of Englewood, of proper wr itten authori t y f r M the City of Sheridan. Respe ctfully submitted, ENGlEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD By: Robert F. Fran t z !jP Chairman I • • - Date : Subject: Recommendatio n: • • MEHOP~DUM TO THE ENGLEWOoD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR REOOMMENDATION OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD July 14, 1969 Proposed Conn ector 's Agreement For Sewage Treatment Service To Area Approximately . loa Acres in Size Located Immediately South of East Quincy Avenue Along the Wes t Side of South Universi ty Blvd. That Wright-McLaughlin Engineers, 2059 Bryant Street, Denver, Colorado, be advised, in writing, that the City of Englewood will enter into connector's agreement, for sewa ge treatment service, with a legally formed district encompassing approximate ly 100 acres, generally de- scribed as being bounded by East Quincy Avenue on the north, Little Dry Creek on the west, South University Blvd . on the east and an east-west line approximately 1/2 mile south of St. Mary's School on the south, with the following provisions to be co ns idered for in -clusion therein: 1. Term of Agreement. 2. Amount of tap fees. 3. Limitation on district by s i ze of area or number of taps. 4. Restriction on time of day for delivery of sewage into the Englewood system. 5. Acknowledgeaent by this small district that, at such time as a large district is formed to serve the Cherry Hills Village and/or Greenwood Hills Village area, with sewer trunk fac lities contemplated wh ich can physically serve this small district, this small district will become an integral part th~-~of; and sewage will no longer be accepted into the Englewood system from said small district in the vicinity of East Quincy Avenue and South Clarkson Street. 6. Others not enumerated. Respectfully submitted, !NGIElllOD WArot AND 7 By: Robert F. Frantz C!Flail'lllan I • • • • • • C ITY O F F I C I A L C07l~Cl~ ~OCU MENT C) ,I,J L 2 1 . 9 CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING CO~.f~L 1 ·'~1::::... • II G FILE June 17 , 1969 NG LEWOoo, COLO. I. CALL TO ORDER. The regular meet1ng of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was ca ll e d to order at 8:05 P . M. by Chairman Woods . Members Present: Carlson; Lentsch ; Lone ; Parkinson ; Touchton ; Woods Romans, Ex-officio Members Absent: None Also Pr e s e nt : City Attorney Criswell II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. May 20, T969 May 27, 1969 Chairman Woods stated the minutes of May 20, 1969, and May 27, 1969, wer e to be consi dered for approval . Lentsch moved: Parkinson seconded: The Minutes of May 20 , 1969, and May 27 , 1969, be approved as written. The motion carried unanimously. III. JOHNSON-STONER-OGDEN S. Cherokee and West Princeton Avenue. Parkinson moved: REZONING R-1-C to R-3-B Lone seconded: The Public Hearing be opened . The motion carried unanimously . Applicants Johnson, Stoner and Ogden were present. CASE #21-69A Tay 1' 1969 Mr . Woods asked Mrs. Romans for a report on the request. Mrs . Romans stated that the application was filed April 28, 1969, for the rezoning of Lots 19 thru 23, Block 19, Jacksons Broadway Heights, from R-1-C (Single-family Residential) to R-3-B (Multi- fami ly Resid ential). These five lots are on the northeast corner of the Cherokee-Princeton intersection . Mrs. Romans stated that the R-1-C Zone District will permit a single family home on 50 ft . frontage, or religious and educational institutions and public buildings on 100 ft . frontage. The R-3-B Zone District will permit single or two-family dwellings on 50 ft. frontage; multi-family dw e llings, doctors offices and other professional offices on 75 ft. frontage; and convalescent homes, nursing homes, hospitals and c lini c s, religious and e ducational institutions and public buildings must hav e 100 ft . frontage. Off-street parking must be provided, and storm drainage must be cared for by the developer of the land. Mrs . Ro mans stated that the requir d fee has been paid , the property has been posted the required l e ngth of time , and public notice appeared in the official City newspaper on May 29th . Mr . Ogd e n 4160 S. Cherokee -stated he was spokesman for the applicants. He noted that they stated on the application they inte nd d to build a 20 unit apartment house if the change in zoning was granted. He stated that they had more recently discussed the matter with Mr . Marshall, architect, and have decided to build a two- 1 . ' I • • ·' I ! ' 'r - • • ( stor y , 12 unit apartment building, which they feel will be compatible wi t h the area. Mr. Ogden presented a copy of their option to purchase th e p rope rty as proponents exhibit #l; exhibit #2 was a sketch of the block indicating those property owners who were in favor (15 in favor or "d i dn't care ") and those property owners who were in opposition (4). Exhibit #3 was a petition signed by 17 persons , with one addendum askin g that that persons' name be removed from the petition in oppo- siti o n to the rezoning and placed on the petition in favor of the rezonin g. Total signatures; 18 . Building plans were also presented, and Mr. Ogden pointed out that the proposed building will be 12 one- bed r oom apartments, designed for young married couples. Mr . Og d e n stated that the applicants are residents of the Englewood area , Mr . Johnson having resided in the area for 15 ~ears, Mr. Stoner for five years, and himself for 29 years, 19 years of which has been at the address on Cherokee. He poin~d out that both Mr. Stoner and Mr . Johnson are employed within the Englewood area also. Mr. Ogden stated that the property has, in the past, been a junk hole , with junk cars, old mattresses, etc. stored there ; however, since Mr . Elliott purchased the property about three years ago, it has improved markedly. Mr . Elliott now wishes to sell this property, and Messrs. Stoner, Johnson, and Ogden have an option to purchase it contingent upon rezoning to R-3-B. Mr . Ogden disputed the statement that the area was zoned for "strictly residential '' use, and cited the school administration complex across the alley to the east of this property, and also a corner grocery store at the corner of West Quincy Avenue and South Cherokee Street. He stated he knew the grocery store had been at that location for a number of years, but stated he did not feel that this made it a "strictly residential" area, an:! with the change that is going on in Englewood, they applied for rezoning in an effort to "control what goes in" on the subject property. Mr . Woods asked for hands of those persons living within the area who were in favor of the rezoning? No one raised their hand as being in favor of the rezoning . Mrs . Romans asked that the following letter be noted in the record; City of Englewood Planning Commission City Hall Englewood, Colo . Ge ntlemen: "Englewood, Colorado June 13, 1969 Subject: Proposed zoning change Lots 19 through 23 Jackson Broadway Hgts. Since I am unable to attend the June 17th hearing on the above mentioned zoning change proposal, I would like to register my oppo- sition by letter. I fe e l the addition of the multi-unit dwelling on the corner of Cher oke e and Princ e ton would c ause a further reduction in the water pr e ssure in our area , which already quite low, especially during summer months . Also , I think ther e is a possibility of parking congestion near that int e rsection, even though off street parking might be furnished tenants. A large number of families now have two automobiles, and I visualiz e these e xcess autos, and the autos of people visiting this p r opos e d unit, taking up the parking space in front of the homes in the area . 2 I • • .• \ I I 1 • • ,_ ( One or mor e multi-unit dwellings are to be built near the inters ec tion of Bannock and Oxford , which is only two blocks from the proposed units to be built at Cherokee and Princ eton, and I do not feel it is at all necessary to have these units this close together. Thank you for your consid e ration of this lett er. Mr. Miller Sincerely, /s / Jerre D . Cavanah Jerre D . Cavanah 4209 South Cherokee Englewood , Colorado" 4171 S. Cherokee-stat e d that he did not live in the area at the present time, but that he still owned the property at the above address. Mr . Miller pres e nted a petition signed by those opposed to the rezoning request, which p et ition contained 62 signatures . Mr. Miller stated they had also drawn a map of the area, on which 37 opponents were indicated in the 4100 and 4200 blocks of Bannock , Ch erok ee and Delaware. Mr. Miller then presented a strip of fi v e pictures of the area, and pointed out that the area isn't run-down, and that with a few exceptions, the homes are brick . Mr . Miller stat e d that in the opinion of the opponents, this rezoning would be "spot zoning", they feel there has been no change in the condition of the area to jus tify the change of zoning. He pointed out that th re is a water pres s ure problem in this area right now, and with th addition of even 12 units, it would become much worse. Ther would be more traffic introduced into the area, and if one apartm nt hou s is built in the area, there will be more requests for r zoning for apartment houses. They like their area as it is zon d (R-1-C), and do not want it changed. Mrs. Krist ns n 420 South Cherokee -stated that they had circulated the petition further than just the 4100 block of South Ch ro k e , that they had covered parts of Bannock and Delaware str eets a s w 11. Mr. Dewey Hill 4201 South Ch erokee -stated that he did not like th e architectur e of th e proposed building . Mrs. Romans pointed out that zoning cannot be conditioned upon a specific building plan . She stated the zoning should be on th e merits of th e R-3-B Zon e classification, and that building plans presented at the time of rezoning h arings generally do not mean any thing and quit e often ar e changed. Sh e pointed out that people should be con- cerned about th e USE that might go in , rather than the LOO KS of a building so far as the zoning goes, that anything that was permitted in the R-3-B Zone District could b e constructed on the site, and not n ece ssarily the apartment building that Mr . Ogden, Mr . Stoner, and Mr. Johnson hav e shown. Mrs. Kristenson 4208 S . Ch rokee -stated that sh e worked in a real estate office, and that rather than one bedroom apartments being in d mand, that the two and three bedroom hom e, such as are fou nd in this block and the surrounding ar e a, ar very much in d e mand , and that the r al e state offices c annot find enough of this property to meet th demand . She fe lt it would be v ry unfair to the remainder of the prop rty own rs in th e block if the r ezoning were to be granted ; she also commented that she fe lt property owners would get mor e for their hom s s lling th m as "homes" rath r than selling their property for apartm nt hous e d v lopment . She asked that the rezoning r e qu est be d eni d. 3 I • • - • • ,_ ( Mrs. Miller 4171 S. Cherokee-stat e d that they did live in the area for nine years, and moved in February of this year, and that they do still own the property at 4171 South Cherokee. She stated that there is a bad drainage problem in this area, and that the storm drains just will not carry the run-of f now, let alone when a large apa rtme nt structure is built, with a black-topped area for parking to create more run-off. She pointed out that during the storm of June 8, 1969, the people in this block had 18" of hail stacke d up in their yards, and in on e home across t h e street, there was 6 " o f mud and water in the basement. Sh e stated if the area appeared "run-down " to the applicants, possibly it was be- ca us e of the "dirt" streets, and that if the streets were paved, she felt the area would be much improved. Mr. Woods asked for the hands of those living in the immediate area who were in opposition to the request? Fourt een people raised their hands to indicate they were in opposition . Mr. Og den stated in rebuttal that the proposed apartment house would not make any difference in the way the drainage ran in the area ; that he had owned his property since 1951, and had no problem. Mrs. Mi ller stated that she did not say it would make any differenc e in the "amount" of drainage coming down , but did say that the blacktop area will not absorb any water , neither will the large apartment house. She stated that Mr. Ogd e n "e njoys the vi ew of the lake" the rest of the residents have to put up with because his property is not situated that low. Mr. Parkinson commented that it appeared to him that several property owners had signed both in favor of the rezoning and in opposition to the rezoning. Touchton moved: Parkinson seconded: The Public Hearing be closed. The motion carried unanimously. Parkinson moved: Lentsch seconded: The matter be tabled for further consideration. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Woods noted that the matter might be considered later in the evening, and then again, it might not be considered until the next regular meeting of the Commis s ion on July 8th, depending on the desires of the Commission. H stated that the members of the audience who wished to observe the re- mainder of the meeting were welcome to do so. IV, SUBDIV ISON WAIVER Don Weakland -Weakland Greenhouses CASE #27-69A June 10, 1969 Mrs. Romans stated that Mr. Weakland has not been in contact with the Pla nning Department since the discussion on June lOth, at which time Mr. Weakland was advised in the manner he might proceed to gain access to his landlocked property. No action was taken. CASE #28-69 Mrs. Romans stated that the proposed parking lot for the Craig Rehabili- tation Hospital will be located across Clarkson and Girard from the Hospital its lf. Mrs. Romans noted that the parking lot has been approved by Mr. Sagrillo, Assistant City Engineer, as to the drainage , and that Traffic Engineer Hammond has reviewed the plan, and has suggested thoc wheel stops be used to prevent ingress-egress from the south directly 4 . , ·' I ! 'f I • • • • ( onto East Girard Av nu a cro ss t h e hollywood curbing. Mrs. Romans noted that the lot will drain north e ast to the alley . Discussion followed. Mr. Lentsch aske d if wh el stops shouldn't be placed along the alley line also to pr event uncontrolled ingress-egress here as has been done on oth r parking lots throughout the City? Mrs . Romans agreed that this should be don e co nsistently throughout the City. Mr . Lon d iscuss e d the drainage problem in that ar e a , and stated that h e did not fe 1 the residents to the e ast of the alley should be subjected to addit1onal drainag e; th city has to pump the ar e a after a storm at th pr s ent time . H sugges te d that the plan b e ref erred back to the En gine r 's office for furt h er study. No formal action was taken ; the matt er will be r eferred to the Engineer's offic e as suggested . VI. BELLEVIEW PARK ANNEXATION Zon1n g of ~Annexation . CASE #29-69 Mrs . Romans state d that th e parcel o f land recently annex e d on the we st boundar y of Be lle vi ew Park is unzoned at the present time. Th e ann ex ation law provides that the property must be zoned within 90 days. Discussion follow e d . Mr. Criswel l s t at e d that the city would be picking up another parcel within 60 days or so, and that he felt it could all be zon e d at the same tim , or possibly when the revised zoning map is adopted. No action was tak e n. VII. STREET RENAMING Santa Fe Lane to Windermere CASE #30-69 Mrs . Romans state d that this change has been suggested by the City Engineer , and it would encompass Santa Fe Lane from Tufts Avenue to Ke nyon Avenu e, where S3nta Fe Lane ends . This would provide continuity in designation with that to the south of West Tu fts Avenue as approv e d by the Commission on May 20 , 1969. Discussion followed. Lon e moved : Parkinson s ec ond e d : Th e Planning Commission recommend to City Council that South Santa Fe Lane betwe e n We st Tu ft s Av e nu e a nd West Kenyo n Avenue b e renam e d to South Windermere Street c oncurr e nt with the renaming of South P ec os Street from West Tufts Av e nu e south to th south City Limits , both name changes to be effective January 1 , 1971 . AYES : NAYS : Carlson ; Lentsch ; Lone ; Parkinson ; Woods Touchton The motion c arried . VIII. ZUIDER ZEE Parkin g~yout CASE #26-69B June 10 , 1969 Mr . Malone , c ounsel f or Zuider Ze e was pr esent for the discussion . Mr . Malone stated that he was concerned about the denial of ac cess from the Zuider Zee parking lot directly onto South Jason Street , the only d dicated street upon which they have ace ss . H stated h e is concerned about any action whic h wo uld d e ny access to a public street as th Com- mission did in th ir recomme ndation of May 20th, wh rein they recomm nded that wh e l stops b e placed along the South Jason Street sid of th park1ng lot , and for a distance of 80 fe t along the north boundary from th northeast cor n er. Mr. Malone stat d that they have th requi r d ntmb r of parki ng s ta lls in their lot , but they fe lt that possibly they ou ld r arrange th e m--possibly los a few--to move t he proposed curb cut whic h is shown on th e south c los to th intersection with #285 on th plans which wer e submitted f urth r to the north. Mr . Malon e sta ted that it would b e si gned for xit o nly , if this would me et with th ap- proval of th Plann i n g Commission . He stated that the Zuid er Zee would 5 I • • I ! . ~ - • • • ,_ • ( ta k e care of the signi ng and light i ng o f the sign . He stated that they would want ingress only on the northern-most curb cut as shown on the plans they have submitted . He stated that this curb cut would be clearly signed also . He stated that there will be some problem getting people into the parking lot of the restaurant anyw a y , inasmuch as east-bound traffic on U.S . 285 cannot turn le ft at South Jason Street. Discussion fo llowe d . Mr. Parkinson commented that there was a restriction on the lo c ation of curb cuts in relation to intersections throughout the City. Mr. Ma lone stated that the cur b cut as proposed would be 23 ft. to 25 ft. from the intersection , and if the cut we re signed for exit only , he did feel there would be a problem . Mr. Pa rkinson noted that there was no traffic signal at South Jason , and that the cars attempting to get across #285 might stack up and cause traffic problems that way. Mr. Malone stated he still felt the main problem would be caused by the theater's patrons who leave in a "group ". Mr. Malone stated he wasn't too concerned about egress from the parking lot , but he wanted access to the parking lot from South Jason Street. Discussion followed. Mr. Lone stated he still felt there would be problems even if the southern most cut were for exit only , someone would try to turn left to get back to the shopping complex, and cause a "real traffic snarl ". Mr. Malone me ntioned the possibility of Jason being made one-way . Discussion followed. Mr. Criswell pointed out that the parking lot has access from the north , and that this public property is devoted to vehicular traffic. Mr. Malone stated that they had no control over what the City might decide to do there, and there is no alley there . Mr. Criswell pointed out that the alleys in this property were vacated a short time ago at the request of Zuider Zee, and that Mr. Malone had been the representative to present the request. The Zuider Zee property picked up the entire north-south alley that was vacated , but did not gain any additional land from the east-west alley vacation. Further discussion followed, on whether or not South Jason Street was indeed a dedicated street. Mr. Criswell stated that he had no reason to believe that South Jason was anything other than a dedicated street at this point . Mr. Malone thanked the Commission for their consideration of the matter. Lone moved: Touchton seconded : The matter be tabled for further consideration . The motion carried unanimously. IX . COLUMBINE FREEWAY Mr . Jerry Kelley and Mr. Deryl Gingery were present for the discussion. Mrs . Romans stated that the Planning Commission has been asked by City Council to mak e a recommendation to Council as to the preferred location of the f reeway proposed in the South Santa Fe corridor--the eastern route or the western route. Th e Commission members have attended several meeti ngs at which time both routes have been discussed, the latest meeting which was at the State Highway Department on June 3, 1969. She sta ted that Mr . Von Frellick has hired engineers to do a study on the e astern route, and when he was informed that a discussion of the Columbine F reeway was planned for this eve ning , he asked that Mr. Kelley ~nd Mr. Gingery be allowed to a t end th is discussion to present their case. Mr . Kelley stated that to co nsider "their " route they had to have the cooperation of the County Commissioners , the railroad officials, the cities of Littleton , Sher i dan and Englewood , the City of Denver . Mr. Kelley stated he has been abl e to obtain a letter of intent from the railroad officia ls in Kansas , a copy of which letter was handed the Commission member s . He stated t hat now with this cooperation on the part of the r ailroad , that the freeway may be constructed on the Santa Fe route, using the railroad right-of-way as well as Santa Fe Drive. 6 • . , .• \ ! 'r I • • f • • ;- ( Mr. Gingery, an engineer, stated that when he was doing the study for the State Highway Department as a member of the firm of Meurer, Serafini and Meurer, he wasn't able to get all of the information he needed, but now, wor king for a private firm, they are allowed to "negotiate under different standards ." He stated that the portion from Louisiana Avenue south to Belleview Avenue would cost $17,600,000. This would have grade separations at Evans, Dartmouth , Hampden, Oxford, Quincy, and Belleview avenues. He stated he felt this proposa l would carry 104,000 cars per day on the Freeway (8 lanes), which is the same amount of traffic indicated in the report of the State Highway Department. Mr. Parkinson stated that he understood the report to say the Freeway would carry the 104,000 cars, and still have the additional volume of whatever Santa Fe could carry. Mr. Kelley stated that they had discussed the river route , and with f rontage roads and the three lanes in each direction, it would "w ipe out Santa Fe ". It would c arry 35 ,000 cars per day on each road, and if Federal Boulevard were impr oved as pro j ected, it would •lso carry 35,000 cars per day. A hookup of the Englewood-Denver one-way street patterns would accommodate 45,000 cars per day , and he felt this would be very adequat e for the metropolitan traffic. Mr. Ginger y stated that the estimating work had been done by himself, and that they would need additional right-of-way through the golf course and the existing railroad right-of-way , a total square footage of 2,250,000 . Approximately 1,500,000 square feet of this would be in Arapahoe Count y and within Denver, 780,000 square feet would have to be obtained . He estimated that the cost would be approximately $500,000 and that Denv er officials had expressed willingness to provide funds for this acquisition. Mr. Kell ey stated that the County Commissioners had also stated that they would like to help in the acquisition. Discussion followed. Mr. Criswell comme nted that he felt they were low in their estimates, that very little land would be obtained for $.20 per square foot. He stated that of the land the City has purchased in the area, that $.40 per square fo ot is the very lowest we have paid. He stated that most of the land in that area is selling for $1.00 per sq. ft. Mr. Lone asked for a cost breakdown on what wo uld have to be devoted to the north end of the proposed route and what would be spent on the rest of the route to the south? Mr. Gingery stated that he did not have the figures with him on the cost of the north end tie in with the Valley Highwa y, but he stated that to start construction on the highway, the railroad tracks would have to be moved at an estimated cost of two and one-half million dollars, which is included in the $17,600,000 figure quoted. Mr. Lentsch questioned the carrying capacity of 104,000 cars . He stated that at the meeting at the Highway Department two weeks ago, it was estimated the carrying capacity of the freeway would be 160,000 cars per day . Mr. Kelley stated he thought they were figuring 10,000 care per day on each frontage road; 35,000 per day on Santa Fe and 104,000 per day on the freeway. Mr. Parkinson asked if these two plans were based on the same standards and widths? Mr. Gingery stated that the standards were not the same, that the western route, as proposed in the study prepared by Meurer , Serafini and Meurer , was baaed on a 60 ft. median, and this proposal has a 36 ft. median, with eight 12 ft. lanes . Discussion followed. Mrs. Romans noted that there is not shown on the plans any attempt to get Floyd open to tie in with the "freeway " or a frontage road. Mrs. Romans stated that since the first discussions about Cinderella City started-- on the old KLZ Site and later on the City Park site--studies showed that Floyd Avenue should be a major arterial and should be extended across the railroad trac ks to Santa Fe or to collectors along the river. She also stated that in conversation with Mr. Merten of the State Highway Department , he had stated on several occasions that Floyd cou ld in de ed be const ructed so as to have access to the west if Mr. Von Frellick or •omeone other than the State Highway Department would pay for i~. She stated that she could 7 \ l '! I • • • • ( no imag1ne in li ght of the pr e v1ous discuss1ons ho w a plan could have b ee n d e vtsed by or for Mr. Von Frellick that did nothing to solve Mr . Vo n Frellick 's ''probl m" of ace ss on t h e north . She questione d the adv1sability of putting all th traffic from the north side of t h e com- plex on to South Fox Stre t to West Dartmou th Avenue and that it would b e contrary to th s at ments to the property ow n ers in the area by both th City officials and th d veloper at the time it wa s discussed w1 th th rcsid nts b for the lection i n 1964 . Mr .K lley stat d h f lt that th interchange at Dartmouth and the free - way would solv th problem , and as far as t h e traffic on Fox Stree t was cone rned, that he "wo uld have an answer to that probl e m i n 1~ weeks". Mr . K lley stated that Englewood officials hav e insisted t hat they must hav e access fro m th north onto Dartmouth Av e nu e . Mrs . Romans state d that to the co ntrary , that City plans show acc e ss to the west on We st Floyd Avenue and that the De nv er Met ropolitan Ar e a Transportation Study , System 48 , showe d Floyd Av e nu e as a major arterial projected to the South Platt Riv er Driv e from South Broadway . She stated that this is a problem and that it will only get worse if plans for a hot e l on the north of th s1te ar e carried out and that Mr. Von Frellick should b e co nsid eri n g it. Mr. K lley stated that the d e velopers of Cind erella City hav e always had only the b e st inte r e sts of the City at h ear t . Mrs. Romans show d Mr. K 11 y ear li e r Master Street Plans , in all of which Floyd Av e nu e was sh own as an arterial , and she stated that to h r knowled ge , th City of Englewood has n e v er state d that they did not want Floyd Av nue to e x t nd und r th e railroad tracks to tie in with either Santa F e Driv or th Plat te River Road . Furth er dis c ussion fo llowed. Mr . L e ntsch ask d Mr . K ll ey how they propos e d to financ th1s project? Mr . Kelle y discuss d s v ral finance considerations , and not ed that they might try to pick up the State Highway Department 's suppl e me ntary budget for the n ext y ar or so . Federal participation in th~ pro j ct was also discuss e d by Mr. Gingery. He noted that the proposed freeway is not of inte rstate 1 ngth and therefore , we cannot get th e 90-10 match i n g funds from the Federal go v rnm nt . Further discussion followed. Mr . Lone ask e d if th r was a c ost stimat e availa le on the portion of the freeway south of B lle vi w. Mr. Gingery stated that it is e stimat e d to b e approximat ely $1 3,00 0,000., the same cost as was reported i n the report don for th State Highway Departme nt . Mr . Woods e xpr e ss d the appreciation of the Commission to Mr . Ke lley and Mr . Ging ery for their attendance . No further a ction was taken . X. TOM STEELE CASE #31-69 Mrs . Romans stated that Mr . Steele has purchas e d Mr . Huffman 's prop e r ty at Radcliff and Huron, where there is a low draina ge ar e a that has b ee n of much concern to the City officials for som e time . Sh e stat e d that sh e had suggest e d in th e past to Mr . Huffman that th e low part b d e v e lope d as park land , if not by himself , then to d eed it to the City and let t h e m d e v e lop it . Mr . Huffman did not agr e to do so , and Mrs Remaps state d that sh e has mad e the same suggestion to Mr . St ee l e. Mr . Steele has a house h e wants to locate on part of h1s property, but the land is not s ubdivid e d . There are pre s ent ly several structures on the property , and it wo uld probably ta k a var iance from th Board of Ad jus tment and App als to p la c anoth r unit on the p roper y , wer 1t not to b e divided into lots . Th re is a pi e of property Mr . St e l owns , whic h has a separat e assessm nL , on which t h placem nt of h house was consid ered , but th r is a 60'' wa t r main runni n g t h rough th land whic h rend e rs it unusabl . Discussion fol lowed . Mr . Steele stat d that he believed th r wer two acr s total in his ownershi p , and that he pu rchas d the sit for incom property. Th re are a tota l of 16 r nt a l un1 t s on the prop rty at th pr sent ti me. Disc uss ion follow d. Mr. Criswell sugg sted that the main pare 1 co uld be subdivid e d in to three sites , and th r by preclude t h e n e d for a varianc on th site 8 I • • I I ' '! - • • ( b e 1ng co nsidered for ~he loca~1on of th addi~1onal s~ructu re . Me mb e rs of th e Commiss1on agr e ed that this might be advisable , and that Mr . Steele co uld s e ll part of his land off if he wanted to if i~ were subd1vided . D1s uss i on followed . Mr . Stee le was advised to see what design he could come up wi th as far as a subdivision was concerned . X I . MAS TER PLAN Comm1ssion members were given rev1sed cop1es of the Comprehensive Plan , t;o which has been added a section: A PLACE TO LTVE . This revised Plan and the new section were reviewed . The hear1ng on the Comprehensive Plan has b e en set for July lst . Mrs . Romans noted that the freeway is not shown in an actual location on the large maps that have been prepared for the ptb lie hearing , but instead there is shown a ''corridor" wherein the f r e eway might logically fall. Mrs. Romans stated ~hat S ate Planning Dir e ctor Miles had stated that he felt a section similar to the new one t1tled A PLACE TO LIVE should be added , 1nasmuch as most communities do not g o into a study of their neighborhoods and run into difficulty on tha t very matter when applying for Federal Aid. The Commission members felt that this section should be in the Comprehensive Plan , and that the plan was as they wanted it before the Hearing . Mr . Carlson and Mr. Touchton noted that they would not be able to be presen~ at the meeting on July 1st. Discussion followed. It was decided that the best thing to do would be to reset he date for Public Hearing to July 17th . Mrs. Romans asked the Commission what procedure should be followed as far as publicity was concerned on the Comprehensive Plan . It was suggested that the Chamber of Commerce and League of Women Voters might be given copies in addition to news releases . Mr . Lone asked why Delaware was being considered as a collector street by the Director of Public Works and the Traffic Engineer when the plans indicate that Fox will be the through street? Mrs . Romans s ated that back in 1958 , Delaware was considered as an arterial street t o ex t end from West Yale Avenue to West Belleview Avenue , and that a good deal of it was built at that that time to the specifications of an arter1al . S1nce that time , however , the shopping complex and t he First Nal1onal Bank have been planned on what would be Sou h Delaware Stree and De nny M1ller Field is developed across what is a a ed South Delaware Stre e~ between West Ithaca and West Jefferson a e nu e s . Now , because more of South Delaware Street is paved than South Fox S ree ·, the City Eng1nee· and Traffic Engineer are of the opinion t hat the Compr e hensive Plan should he changed , designating South D lawar Stre t as a collector ra t h e r than South Fox Street . The Traffic Eng1ne r has sta t d that , 1n hls opinion , an arterial street does not hav to b of any des1gna ed length , and hat he feels motorists can mak the og We st K nyon Av enue either to Sou t h Cherokee Street or South Elati Stre and h n go on hrough the City . Discussion followed . Mr . Lon asked why , 1f he "plans " can be changed just because one s~reet isn 't up to standards , and could ell be brought up to standards , does this office and th1s Comm1sS1on spend the tim e study1ng , revis1ng , and recommend1ng a plan that w feel is a direct r out e , such as Fox Street in th i s part1cular ins t ance? Further dis c ussion f ollo we d . Mr . Lon e also comm e n t ed tha he felt possibly some people wo uld h av pur c has e d prop r r y o n a c e rla1n s lree b ec a u s e t t was not e d 1n t h e plans at t ha L1m e hat 1t wouldn 't b an a rter tal or h r ough s tre e t , md t he n ur n a rou nd a nd f1nd t hat Lh e C1 t y has c hanged 1 's m1nd . Fu rt h e r dis c uss1on f o llowed . Mr . Parkinson sta e d that h f e l t we could mak e a f1n a l d c 1s1o n a fter he Publ1 c Hear 1ng . Th e meet 1ng a d J ou r n d a t 11 :20 P . M. 9 I • • f - [[ ,, I I I • • 0 • CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Russell G. Woods , Jr ., Chairman Leo Lentsch, Vice Chairman Kenneth Carlson C . K. Touchton Richard Lone (Councilman) J . Louis Parkinson (Councilman) D. Andrews Romans, (Planning Director) Ex-officio Gertrude G . Welty, Recording Secretary I . • ·' \ ! I . ' '!' • , . 0 - ... I ' I I , • I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • FOREWARD ••• All of us want Englewood to be a city with liva bl e neighborhoods, a prosperous business climate and productive industrial dis tricts . We want it to be a progressive city which provides adequate services--- fire and police protection---water---sanitary sewer---storm drainage ---street improv ement s---and the convenience of public and semi-public facilities---parks---playgrounds---swimming pools---tennis-shuffleboard- horse shoe courts---a well-staffed and efficient school system--- health facilities---religious institutions of different faiths---an art center--a symphony---and theaters . We want all of these services and facilities in order that our physical needs and comforts can be met, and our minds and souls nourished . We want a city with beauty and amenity where every person---every man , every woman, and every child---can live in dignity and with purpose . If thes e goals are to be reached , we need to look ahead---to plan for our future---to guide and direct the redevelop~ent of our older areas and our new growth . Our city has grown as the result of the ideas, the contributions and actions of an untold number of individuals over a period of years---some private citizens , and some dedicated officials elected by their neighbors to represent them . Now if we are not to work at cross purposes, some means must be found to coordinate 'and direct the actions which were taken yesterday, and the actions which are being taken today toward our common objective---to make Englewood a desirable place to live tomorrow . The "means" by which we can accomplish this , we shall call the "planning process". This process is expressed through a document referred to as the Comprehensive Plan . To prepare and continually update the Comprehensive Plan is a major function of the City govern- ment, for in the final analysis, the elected officials and their administrative staff must bear the responsibility for guiding the character of our city . The Comprehensive Plan is a "guide", it is the framework within which we shall build for Tomorrow . The City Pla nning and Zoning Commission with the assistance and cooperation of the many municipal departments, has re-evaluated Englewood Tomorrow, the Plan of the late '50 's and the Guide for Growth, the Plan of the early '60's , and has prepared this Comprehen- sive Plan as a guide to the City Council and the Citizens of Englewood. It represents the latest and best thinking for the future of our city . In generalities this Plan looks ahead thirty years---to 2000 A .D .--- but to plan for thirty years from now---indeed, to plan in specifics for ten years from now is unrealisti6, for Planning must be a con- tinuing program . It isn 't a matter of drawing the charts and maps, writing the text , putting them in a binder on the shelf and settling back in the Chair , satisfied that all is well because "We have adopted our Comprehensive Plan ". No, as new influences are brought to bear, as people and ideas cha nge , as technology and techniques change, our Plan must ~e reviewed and revised . .• • -------- I ! '!' I ' I I I I I I I I II II II • • ,. . 0 - The Comprehensive Plan should be more than a "guide", it should also be a budgetary tool . This Plan should be the tool used to determine the City's Public Improvement Program. Unfortunately, even though we have had a Capital Improvement budget for many years, public improve- ments in the past have usually been constructed only when the need was so pressing that further delay was impossible. The physical plant of the city is too important and represents too great a public invest- ment to be delegated second place and implemented only if the City in- come is such that these improvements can be planned within the frame- work of the perennial "bare-bones budget." Instead, there must be, as a part of the municipal budgeting process, an agressive five-year Capital Improvement Program based upon priorities established after an objective study of the Plan. To do this, there must be public understanding and support! City officials alone can do little unless there is widespread public under- standing of these matters and a widespread public demand that these improvements be built, and a committment to pay for them. Only then can Englewood truly become Progress Country, U.S. A. I • • .• I ! ' ' 'r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • • • . ' I· • ·. · ·· I I J . ' . 'f • ' . I .I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • 0 - All ,JA CENT TO ANO DIRECTLY SOUTH OF DENVER INCORPORATED MAY 13 , 1903 HOME R UI.E WITH COUNCIL-MANAGER 5.9 SQUARE MILES JH,600 POPULATION (1969 es t.) 5,306 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL JULY AVERAGE MAXIMUM 88° JANUARY AVERAGE MAXIMUM 430 1:1.4 INCHES ANNUAL PRECIPITATION 56.2 INCHES ANNUAL SNOWFALL IJ • I s I 0 r y Q n d c IJ 0 r 0 c I e r ·., I · • ·' I ! ' 'r - • • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • ,_ • 0 • HISTORY AND CHARACTER In 1859, gold was discovered in the Little Dry Creek where it flows into the South Platte River near Dartmouth Avenue. News of this dis- covery traveled fast, and in 1859, the famous gold rush was on. The goldrushers and their families began establishing small communities. In 1864, Thomas Skerritt settled on the site where the City of Englewood is now located. At this time , Indians were still roaming the range , and Skerritt told of feeding hungry Ute Indians encamped on the site where Flood Junior High now stands. Skerritt was also responsible for establishing the first connecting route between Denver and Englewood. This route, called Broadway be- cause of its width, was laid out by plowing a double furrow from Cherry Creek south to Englewood. This route was the basic layout for Broadway today. One of the earliest names recorded for Skerritt 's settlement was Fiske Gardens. Later, due to the many beautiful trees in the area, the com- munity was known as Shady Side, and still later, Orchard Place. In 1903, Orchard Place was incorporated and given the name Englewood , meaning "wood of the nook." The boundaries of the town at that time were Yale on the north, Clarkson on the east, Breen (Quincy) on the south, and the railroad tracks on the west. Incorporation was no easy task, as the city had long been known as one of the toughest tiny spots in the state. The proponents for incorpora- tion were primarily new settlers, and based their platform for incor- poration on governmental exclusion of the many establishments of ill- repute, amusement, and drinking. The opponents of incorporation were the old settlers who wanted the city to remain "wide open". In one of the most spirited election days ever seen in the area, the new settlers won by a narrow margin, and the newly elected officials began the ar- duous task of cleaning up the city, building a new jail and dog pound , and studying water and irrigation problems. Early Englewood was well-known for its Tuileries Park, located in what is now the 3300 and 3400 blocks of South Broadway . This park comprised some 35 acres, and included a large artificial lake, the largest dancing pavilion west of Chicago, an airdrome, and all the latest amusement park devices. In 1915, after operating for only nine years , the lavish Tuileries closed its doors, bringing to an end the fun and gaiety that the park had brought to everyone. Beginning in 1883 and operating until 1910, the Cherrelyn Horse Car was one of the most popular attractions in Englewood. Old Dobbin , often clad in an old straw hat, would pull the street car up the hill to Cherrelyn on Broadway from the Loop, located in the vicinity of Hampden 1 I • 0 I I ' ' 'r I •• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • 0 - and Broadway, a nd th e n r id e ba c k d own on a platform prov~d d h1m on th ba c k of t h e car . Hors es were changed every two or t h ree tr~ps and the fare wa s fi v e ce n t s . T h e colorful car , orig ~nally h eated by co al , is now on displ ay next to th e City Hall. A loca l bank has p rovided shuttle s erv ice b e tween the downtown busin e ss district and the Cind r e lla City Center with a motori zed replica of th e Hors e Car . From incor poration in 1903 , through a highly co nt e s ted and narrowly wo n victory to avoid annexation to De nv er 1n the twenties , to a four-year fig ht for City own e d water in th f tf t t e s , Englewood has s t ru gg led to maintain h er sel f -g over nm ent. By a vot e of the p eop l e , Englewood be- came , in 1958 , a Hom e Rule City wt t h a Council-City Mana ger f orm of government . Under this form of municipal government , t h e city 1s pro- gressing at an un exce ll e d rate. In population alone , Engl ewood has grow n by l e aps and bounds. From a population of 16 ,869 in 1950 , the city grew to 33 ,398 in 1 960. According to t h e last census , Englewood ranks sixth in size in population in t h e state of Colorado . Pr ojected plans anticipat the City's population to b e from 50 ,000 to 55 .000 by 1980 . With a booming trade , En g l ewood now ran ks sixth in r et a1l sales in the State. In the last d ec ad e, E n g l ewood has xperienced an excel l ent tndustrial growth . The city now c on tai ns som e 60 indus tri al firms , too many to m ntion in their e ntir et y , but inc luding th e internatio n ally known General Iron Works , Canada Dry Bottl i n g Company , Coors Dts tr~butor , S alte st Dairy and Stainless Equipme nt Co mp a n y . Eng l ewoo d is also famous for its car na tio n industry, producing about o n e -fo urth of the 80,000,000 blooms grow n annually in the S tate . Besid es being a "hub" of business and indus tr.,ia l activity , En g l ewood is a pleasant residential communi ty . The traffic program has rece i ve d many na tio nal and loca l citations for safety , and t h e f~re department i s co nsid ered on e of the f in est i n the na ti on . The res i d e ntial areas ar e n eat , c l ea n , quiet, and wel l protected by an efficient police force . Am ong th man y community assets are the Swedish Medica l Center , the Craig Rehabi lita tio n Hospi tal , 23 churches of various denom~natto n s a forward-loo k i ng public school system with nine elementary schools , two junior hi g h sc hools and o n e senior high schoo l , two e l eme ntar y parochial schools and th Conservative Baptist Theologica l S em in ry . a gra duat e theological school. Four s e nior colleges and one junior co ll ge are located within the immediate De nv er area . Englewood also offers an outstanding park and recreatton progran., a progressive library, th e Community Arts Symphony and the l ocal C mmun~ty Arts program. The City also has many c lubs and c 1v1c organizattons devoted to public s er vi c . 2 I • • .• \ ! I '!' - I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I • 0 - • 0 p I 0 c e I 0 I • I v e I · • .. 1 •• .• I ! I . . '!' - - I I I I I I I I • • 0 - A PLACE TO LIVE Although the neighborhood concept was taken into account some 2000 years ago, the neighborhood unit principle was not clearly formulated for planning principles until 1920 when a man named Perry undertook a study for New York . Mr . Perry suggested that if six principles were followed, " ... there will result a neighborhood community in which the fundamental needs of family life will be met more completely ... " The six principles are : 1. Size. A residential unit development should provide housing for ~ population for which one elementary school is ordinarily required, its actual area depending upon its population density. 2. Boundaries. The unit should be bounded on all sides by arterial streets, sufficiently wide to facilitate its by-passing, instead of penetration , by through traffic. 3. Open Spaces. A system of small parks and recreation spaces , plannea-to meet the needs of the particular neighborhood should be provided . 4 . Institution Sites. Sites for the school and other institutions having service ~pheres coinciding with the limits of the unit should be suitably grouped about a central point, or common. 5. Local Shops. One or more shopping districts, adequate for the popuTaTIOn~e served, should be laid out in the circumference of the unit, preferably at traffic junctions and adjacent to similar districts of adjoining neighborhoods. 6. Internal Street System. The unit should be provided with a special street system, each street being proportioned to its probable traffic load , and the street network as a whole being designed to facilitate circulation within the unit and to dis- courage its use by through traffic. (Ref .: Clarence Arthur Perry , Housing for the Machine Age, New York. Russell Sage Foundation , 1939.) The focal point of the neighborhood is the elementary school which should be no more than a one-half mile walk from the farthest dwelling . There has been much critici sm of this neighborhood concept over the years, but now, as more emphasis is being placed on the individual , on the family , and on the "group", our attention is once more focused on the "neighborhood". 1 • I • •' \ ! r fl · r1 I I I I I • - The City of Englewood can quite easily and naturally be divided into six "neig hborhoods", two being the extreme northwest and southwest areas of the City, and the rest of the City being divided on either side of South Broadway and on either side of U.S . 285 . Our attention can now be focused on all school and city facilities as they serve these neighborhoods , Each of these neighborhoods have be en analyzed using the Englewood Plan- ning Department MONTAGE and LAND-USE STUDY and at least five areas identified where there is a concentration of deteriorating and dilapidated housing units, which sho~ be considered for redevelopment through a cooperative program between the property owners and the City . • These areas are: (Area 1) Northwest Englewood, the entire residential area ; (Area 2) between East Dartmouth Avenue and East Girard Avenue and between South Broadway and approximately South Logan Street ; (Area 3) between U.S. 285 (West Hampden Avenue) and West Lehigh Avenue and between South Broadway and South Delaware Street (immediately south of U.S. 285 in the industrially zoned area, the deteriorated units ex- tend further west, however, it is assumed that because of th e proximity to the Cinderella City complex that this area will redevelop through private enterprise), and (Area 4) the 4700 block from South Acoma Street through the east side of South Huron Street ; (Area 5 ) North of West Dartmouth Avenue and west of South Broadway over to the railroad right-of-way. There are other "aged" areas which are adjacent to South Broadway for its entire length, particularly north of U.S . 285 , and there are older homes sprinkled throughout the entire City which must be checked periodically for conformance with the minimum Housing Code standards in an effort to keep them from deteriorating to the point that they decrease the value of newer homes in the area. To encourage the redevelopment of these aged properties which are interspersed among the newer homes, is one of the biggest planning challenges faced by the City. Although according to the most current land use information, about 91% of the City's approximately 11 ,147 housing units are sound, steps must be taken to control any further deterioration and plans developed to rehouse any persons living in these areas in houses which must be torn down . Steps are being taken to e ncourage the redevelopment of som of these aged prope rties through the revised Comprehensive Zonin g Ordinan e , which will p rmit an admixture in certain areas of medium d e nsity units wit h the single-family units. It is the goal of the Comprehensive Plan for the City of En g l ew ood to guide the orderly red e velopment of the aged areas and to preserve th integrity of the newer neighborhoods , in order that a pleasant , h althy , prosperous total e nvironment can be provided for all of the citizens 2 • I 0 f • • 0 - of tbe City. A place to live. A place where a human being can fully realize bi• individual dignity, a place where he is well-hou.ed, a place where there i• economic opportunity , a place where hi• children can get a good and varied education, a place for his children to play, a place to •bop, a place to have fun or to listen to mu•ic or to aee work• of art, and a place to worship. This ia our goal. <7--=> One facility that mu•t be expanded to serve the neighborhood• i8 public tran•portation. Bu• •ervice mu•t be made available to the people living within tbe neighborhood• in order that they can get to and from work, to and from tbe •tore• or tbe doctor or the denti8t . Many of our reai- dent•, 11,, are over •ixty year• of age and have no private mean• of getting around. Al•o, a• traffic increase• and driving and parking become more and more difficult, efficient public tranaportation •erving tbe re8idential neighborhood• could satisfy many of the trip demand• of tbe citizena. It i• propo•ed that plana be made t o extend bu• •ervice to tbe re•idential area of northweat Englewood , to t he northea•t area running on Ba•t Dartmouth Avenue or Eaat Floyd Avenue between South Broadway and South Vniver•ity Boulevard , to the aoutheaat area on South Logan Street to Belleview and tbe central aouthweat area on South Fox Street between U. 8. 285 and We8t Belleview Avenue . The preaent bua •ervice 8bould continue on South Federal Boulevard between Weat Belleview Avenue; however, additional bu•e• will be needed to provide more frequent aervice. 3 ·. ·' \ ! '!' I • • a - p 0 p II u I II 0 II I • I I ~ 0 I n II II 0 n I d I 0 n d u II $ 8 II II I II II II II II II II II I I 0 .. POPULATION AND LAND USE In 1903, the year of Englewood's incorporation , the City's population was approximately 2,000. Growth was slow and fairly steady until after World War II; then, during the post-war years, the gr o wth rate sky- roc k eted . The rate has now slowed somewhat, although it is still at a high level, and present trends indicate population growth from 1960 to 1980 will probably equal that from 1950 to 1960. A portion o f the City's future population growth will be a result of construction in t h e dwin- dling undeveloped areas , but most of this growth will result from re- d eve lopment in older areas. Much of this redevelopment, particularly in the areas adjacent to the central business district, and in the vicinity of the hospital compl e x , will be through the renovation o f older single-family residences to new me dium and high density multi- family dwelling structures . This trend has been evident in the Ci ty f or the last several years; however, the climat e for redev e lopment withi n these areas has never been as excellent as it is at this time . The gre at drawing power of the new Cinderella City shopping complex, together wi th the newly improved carrying capacity of c or e area streets by virtue of improved traffic regulatory devices, will continue to revita lize and stimulate n ew growth in the business distri ct. This new developme nt is anticipat ed to be in the form of pro fe ssional and service offices, low-income housing, multi-family apartment complexes and the c onve ni e nce and specialty shops to serve the residents and employees withi n the ar e a as well as clients and customers who will be drawn to the location. The propos e d multi-family development on the former KLZ transmitter site which is located one mile directly to the e ast of the centr al business district, will particularly stimulate redevelopment of the c orridor between U.S. 285 and Floyd Avenue and from South Lafayette Street we st to the central business district. New development in the western portion of the City adjacent to South Santa F e Driv e and the railroad f acilities will primarily b e industrial and, though important to Englewood's economic base, wil l not add directly to the population within the City, There are s ever al methods of forecasti n g the fut u re populati on of the City , ranging from pseudo-scientific conjecture to rather refined techniques . Basically, the various methods fall into three categories : (1) the assumption that past growth trends are inevitable; (2) the d e termination of anticipated influences both within the City and within th adjacent area; and (3) the assumption that approximate popula tion c an be predetermined and controlled by means of zoning. Becaus e there ar only four unincorporated areas adjoining the City, its ar e a is necessar ily restricted to pretty much its present area . In light of this physica l restriction and considering the City's future ability to provide necessary services, many authorities and o fficials have pro- 1 I I I II II II II II I II I I I I II II II I 'I 'I 0 jected an ideal population figure of 55,000. Such a population would be large enough to provide a variety of land uses , population densities, dwelling types, and services , yet would not be so large as to impare the City's facilities, services , and transportation network . Population and land use can be guided toward a specific goal and held at an optimum level , through the judicious use of zoning controls, It is the task of those who prepare and modify the City 's zoning to deter- mine this optimum level of land use type, intensity, distribution, and corresponding population. It will also be their responsibility to realize that technology and social values are changing and to constantly review and reevaluate these changes in the light of zoning requirements. What may seem an optimum level today, may be hopelessly unrealistic for the living patterns of the future. 2 I - I I ENGLEWOOD POPULATION I I PROJECTED I ACTUA L I I 2000 I 1990 II 1980 II 1970 I 1960 I I 1950 I 1940 I 1930 I 1920 ... I I 1910 - I 1900 • II I 10 20 so 40 50 10 I IN THOUSANDS - p u I IJ I • I c I I , I (J c I I • I I I • I • I • I I (J I I $ I t I • , ,. 0 • P l~LI C FA C I LIT I ES The primary function of a city government is to provide for and insure t he h e alth , sa fety , and well -being of its citizens. Public facilities provide f o r these s ervices, a nd therefore, merit careful consideration in community planning . The appearance , design, location , and efficiency of city facilities reflect the character, ideals, and capabilities of both the city 's residents and its municipal leaders. The CITY HALL and LIBRARY complex is the newest and most essential addition to the public-owned buildings. In 1965, it consolidated the functions of two older structures and provided more than seven times the us~ble floor capacity . The building is air conditioned , supplied with new efficient office equipment, is pleasantly landscaped, and provides parking space for 130 cars. The library, located on the north side of the property, has seating for over 100 persons, with an adjacent area which is being considered for future expansion. According to American Library Association standards, the library is presently 30% understocked ; however , the City is an active participant in the Central Colorado Public Library System (CCPLS), which currently is experimenting in a "reciprocal borrowing" project. The program allows any person with a card from any CCPLS member library to borrow books from any other member without paying any special fees or nonresident charges. The results of the experiment might well effect the applicability of these standards. The Roadrunner, the Englewood bookmobile, serves the out- lying areas Monday through Friday . One of the most vital responsibilities of the city government is to provide adequate FIRE and POLICE PROTECTION. The facilities of both of these services are inadequate because of the large population in- crease that the City is experiencing. To prevent even worse conditions, new efforts must be made to expand existing facilities, preferably on a new, centrally located site, and also to acquire new equipmen t, additional manpower , and adequate training facilities to insure qualified personnel. An additional station will be needed to serve the area west of South Santa Fe Drive. Educational programs for both children and adults are offered by t he ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL SYSTEM, An important goal for the system has been the d e signing of a program which would provide an environment to meet the needs of the pupil--regardless of race, creed, ability , or interest . To make this objective possible , the citizens support nine elementary schools, two junior high schools, and one senior high school, with an average of less than 28 students per class. The buildings are either new or near new , all in excellent condition, and it is estimated that the present facilities will all be paid for by 1973 . No major increase in school enrollment is projected ; however, some additions are being 1 ____ _....--: , I'. - planned, such as an auditorium at the Sinclair Junior High School, and a relocation of the Scenic View School from the industrial ar ea into the residential area . Englewood has 23 CHURCHES, providing services, counseling, and instruc- tion for all major denominations. In addition, they serv e the community in many public activities, providing facilities for private clubs, public meetings, and centers for youth activities. There are also two parochial elementary schools, and a graduate Theological Baptist Seminary within the City. Community health requirements are met by the facilities of SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER, which annually treats more than 40,000 persons in its convalescent and out-patient centers. As one of the nationally renowned hospital facilities in the metropolitan area, Swedish Medical Center off rs th full range of modern medical services, adequate for the community and the 1,000 babies which it delivers into the world each year. This 282 bed hospital will be compleme nted by the CRAIG REHABIL- ITATION HOSPITAL on the eastern edg of the Swedish Medical Center site. The Craig Rehabilitation Hospital will offer a specialized program for the treatm nt of spinal cord injured patients. In addition to out- patient treatment facilities, 80 beds will be made available . Englewood maintains an efficient SEWAGE DISPOSAL plant which was ini- tially built in 1953 and then doubl e d in capacity in 1960. It utiliz es a primary and secondary filtratio n type system, which can accommodate a population of 100,000. No major restrictions are placed on industrial use, and up to 25% of the present unused capacity could be made available to new industry. Englewood's n ew McLellan Re servoir and other RESERVOIRS, including those on Meadow Cr ek, have capacity to supply enough water to support a population in excess of 55,000 in addition to accommodating new industries. Electric POWER and natural ga s service is provided by privately owned facilities at rat s that compare favorably with those throughout the nation . Th e Engl e wood Planning Commission in the 1969-1975 Capital Improvements Prog ram outlin e s sp cific projects for priority dev lopment of public fa ilitie s. Among those of greatest concern are : (A) continued park xpansion , in c luding the acquisition and dev lopment of prop rty for a City g olf ours at the McLellan Dam Site; (B) expansion of the City Library and continu d funding for additional publications; (C) a tower and training facilities for the fire d partm nt; (D) construction of a n w police and mergency center ; (E) new und rground utiliti s and ontinued traffic signal procurement, and (F) expanded storm drainage c ontrol and stre t surfacing. In addition, it is hoped that smaller but 2 ' I II II I fl II I I I • • - equally important projects such as Little Dry Creek beautification and tree planting campaigns could be initiated and completed by the citizens themselves. It is most important in all city projects that private initiative and incentive be encouraged. 3 • ' \ ! '!' ------------' ,. . - II II 'I ~ ~ r ~ e c 'I r II e 0 Ill I , Ill I 0 II n II II ~· p I 0 • II n II • I I I • .· ', ! ' • ~ ----~ -- 'I II ll I' II I • - PARKS AND RECREATION From the standpoint of many of th e citizens of Englewood, and from adjacent communities as well, the decision of the voters in 1964 to s e ll the City's only major park for $1,000,000. in order that the Cinderella City shopping complex could be built, was one of the most far-sighted steps taken by the community in their concerted drive to become "Progress Country, U.S.A." The $1,000,000 . was ear-marked for r e placement park land acquisition. Prior to that time, the major park consisted of 23.4 acres, one acre of which was not developed, and accommodated a base ball diamond, fenced from the proceeds of a "Youth" Festival in 1952 when comedian Bob Hope c am e to town; tennis courts, out-door swimming pool owned by the Englewood Lion's Club, two shelter houses and band stand built by the Jay cees , several fire places, picnic tables, horse shoe courts, and a meand eri ng stream, Little Cry Creek, that flooded occasionally but gave the local Huckl e berry Finns a place to hunt for crawdads. In addition, the city had the f ollowin g facilities: TOTAL UNDEVELOPED DEVELOPED FACILITIES ACRES ACRES ACRES ,. . Bard e Park --z-:-79 2.79 P1cnic area, informal ball field, open play area. Commerce Park 1. 10 0 1.10 Picnic area, sledding hill. Clarkson-Amherst .49 0 .49 ..Qpen play area . Bak r Park . 82 0 .82 Picnic area, play ap- paratus area, open play area. B 11 view Park 31.80 31.80 0 Bates-Logan Park 3.28 3.28 0 Play apparatus area. Jason Park 3.65 3 .65 0 TOTAL •67.33 38.73 28.60 The location of of the fo rm er City Park was a poor one for the children to reach, with a State Highway adjoin i ng the park on the south , railroad tracks and a major highway on the west and a bus y ce ntral business district on the east. Because of these barriers, th e only safe access to the park was from the north. At a few of the larger elementary school sites, small gras s ed areas were being developed jointly by the School District and the Parks and Recreation Dep artment. After th sale of the City Park was completed, the wheels were immediately set in motion for the City's new park program. Five neighborhood parks, asily and safely a ccessibl e to the children , were planned in the differ- ent quadrants of the City, as were two olymp ic-size swimming pools--an * with Cit y Pa r k . 1 • -------' II ,. • • indoor pool at the High School and an outdoor pool at Sinclair Junior High School--and a baseball field to replace the one purchased in the Park sale . Due to the far-sightedness of some of Englewood's dedicated citizens and the leadership of the Englewood government, the following facilities are either constructed or under construction with funds from the Park sale, Federal assistance and contributions from various organizations: TOTAL UNDEVELOPED DEVELOPED FACILITIES ACRES ACRES ACRES Bar de Park ---z:-7"9 2. 79 (Charles Hay School) Commerce Park 1 .10 0 (U.S. 285 & South Acoma Street) Clarkson-Amherst .49 0 Baker Park . 82 0 (West Wesley Avenue and South Vallejo Street) Belleview Park 32.77 (West Belleview Avenue and South Inca Street) Bates-Logan Park 5.59 Jason Park 8.32 (South Jason Street and West Quincy Avenue) Miller Field 5.52 (South Elati Street and West Jefferson Avenue). 23.80 0 0 0 2 1.10 .49 .82 8.0 5.59 8.32 5.52 • Same as before. Same as before. Same as before. ~icnic Area, play ap- paratus area, restroom, shelter house, open ...2_lay area. lrorseshoe courts, one lighted ball field, petting zoo , space- age play apparatus area, picnic area, miniature train, rest- rooms, shelter house, shuffleboard courts, four lighted tennis courts, all purpose court, open play area, sledding area. Circus-theme play ap- paratus area, picnic area, restroom, shelter house, open play area, informal ball field. !fursery and Fairy Story theme play apparatus area , picnic area, rest- room, shelter house, open play area, in- formal ball field. irour ball fields, pic- nic area, football and soccer fields, recre- ation building. --------·-- \ ! ' r r 11 II II jl II II I I ~ I ~ • .. TOTAL UNDEVELOPED DEVELOPED ACRES ACRES ACRES Dartmouth Park 11.60 (600 West Dartmouth Avenue) Duncan School/Park 1.20 Centennial Park 40. 40. (South Federal Boulevard and West Union Avenue). 0 Swim Pool (outdoor) 1.2 .6 (Sinclair Junior High School) Swim Pool (indoor) 0 0 (Englewood High School) TOTAL 110.43 64.40 McLellan Dam Golf Course (proposed). 11.60 1.20 under develop- ment. .6 0 46.03 (County Line road east of South Santa Fe Drive). FACILITIES Horseshoe courts, hand ball court, west- ern play apparatus area, picnic area , restroom, shelter house, shuffleboard courts, four tennis courts (unlighted), bandstand, all purpose court, open play area, informal ball field. iPlay apparatus , open play area, informal ball field, recreation ~uilding. Nautical play appara- tus, picnic area, restrooms, open play area, lighted ball field, fishing pond , 26 acre lake to be completed in 1975. i3wim pool (olympic size). Swim pool (olympic size). The City is seeking assistance from the Federal Land & Water Conservation Fund to acquire and develop 200 acres into a golf course-park combination. The Denver Regional Council of Governments has approved this request. The Recreation Department, supervised by a well-qualified staff, provides a diversified program of year-round-activities including tennis lessons , dance classes for both children and adults, archery, singing groups, baton twirling and acrobatics, dramatic classes, playgrounds, ceramic, 3 • ' ! ~ I ' • j I II II II II ,. ,. 0 - craft and art classes , adult softball, baseball for boys eight t hrough 19 years of age , junior football , s wim ming and summ er playgrou nd activities. After this all-out effort to provide park facilities , one would possibly think that the City could turn its attention to other mat ters ; but this is not the case . The Denver Regi onal Council of Governments in the REGIONAL OPEN SPACE P LAN SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE DENVER METROP OLITAN RE T ION, REPORT NO. 6807 , Decemb er, 1968 , stat e s that 10.5 acr e s of park and recreati on land should be provided f or each 1 ,000 peopl e. Based upon our projected population of 55 ,000 in 1980 , Englewood should have approximately 577 .5 acres o f land d e voted to park and recreation facilities ; at this time , we have 110 .43 acres, which figure d oes not include some school playgrounds. DRCOG shows our need by 2000 based on their popu- lation proj ection , as 973.9 acres o f park land. The gr owth we hav e experienced in the city since 1950 , and the growth that we are going to continue to e xperi e nc e, together with t h e trend towar d shorter work weeks and mor e l ei sure time, will put an e ven greater d e mand upon Engl ewood's s ervices and facilities . With u r ban- ization cau sing land which might oth erwi s e hav e been availabl e for recreation use t o b e used for hom e sit es and c omm ercia l and indus t rial d e velopment , and the value of the available land in the city s te ad ily increasing, sit e s for additional f a cilities are going to b e di fficult to obtain and extreme ly e xpe nsiv e. Even though our municipal ordinances will require builders and d eve lopers to provide a cert ain amount of open space and recreation facilities to a ccommodat e their r e side nts in high-density population areas , addi ti onal large-scal e recreational facilities such as the municipal golf cou rse and water sports ar e as will b e required. In addition, the r e d e v elopm e nt of t h e age d areas in the City to provide new medium-density , low and me dium income housin g will undoubtedly place a heavy burd e n on the pre s ent fac ili ties and will require either new sites or an expansion of xisting sit e s . As o n e sourc e for additional open spac e , it is suggested that t h e possibility of mini-parks or vest-pocket parks scatt e r e d throug hout the City on substandard lots , or upon land dedica ted for streets in areas where t hose streets could be conveniently vacated , b e xplored. This wo uld be a small area f acilit y which would provide a limited program of active or pas s ive recre ation , usually for one class or ag gr oup ranging from the toddler playground to the Senior Citizen "quiet ar e a". The Tot Lot at Maddox School , t h e Baker Pa rk in northwest Englewood , th drainage par k way at East Amherst Av e nue and South Clar kson Street, and the Bard e Park at Charles Ha y School are e xamples of a mini- par k f acility . Throughout the City there are undeveloped sites , usually in dra inage ways , that should be acquired and d e v eloped for recreation fac ilitie s, thus solving both the storm draina ge and recreation needs. Some possible locations which are suggested are: fir st , the southwest c orner of South Emerson Street and East Ba tes Av enue , an unplatted parcel 4 • f I ' II I' I I • - whi c h is n eeded as a drainage area , an unplatted parcel at approximately We s t Rad c liff Avenue and the Huron-Inca alley which has no access , and i s a drainag e area; a drainage way which bisects the Davolt Subdivision at We st Stanford Avenue and South Galapago Street, and a draw between South Te jon Street and South Zuni Stre et and between West Vassar Avenue and West Colle ge Avenue (this could be developed into a neighborhood park , we re the entire area to be acquired , as would be recommended). It is a matter of fun dam ental concern for everyone to develop an aware- ness, appreciation and understanding of the significance of recreational facilities to the community and its people. A total recreational pro- gram must be provided to include a variety of activities to stimulate the interest of all age groups. Additional acquisition of land will continue to require foresight on the part of both the citizens and the City government if we are to have adequate recreational facilities in the future. Our needs must be recognized now and plans initiated to acquire land. Inaction now will result in future inadequacy. 5 ... • ~ ----~ - \ 1 -r I ' • - I I I I I I d r I 0 I • I n I 0 I I 9 1 I e p I • 0 n I • , . ~ .. .• \ I I -------~-- I I I I I • • 0 - DRAI:SA GE PLAN The d rainag system of ear l y Englewood cons i sted primaril y of t hr ee run- off i nt rceptors: (1) De nver City Ditch (an e arly collector for irriga- tion use, now suppl yi ng Denver 's Washington Park l a k e s ); (2) The S out h Pla tt Riv er ; and (3) Li tt l e Dry Creek. As the City develope d, it was realized t ha t this syst e m of storm drainage was inadequate if e xt e nsiv e prope rty damag e was to b e avoided and the safe ty of the c itiz e ns pro-tected. Of con ce rn to former City officials, was some mea n s of establishing flood control me asur e s on Little Dry Cr ee k , as this Cr ee k had p r odu ced major floods within th e City in 1913, 1927 , and 1933 . In 1933 two flood control improvements w r e e stablish e d on Little Dry Creek . Th e improve- me nts consisted o f the En g l ewood Det e ntion Dam (constructed on the Creek fiv e miles south e ast of t ~e City) and th e straightening and e nlar g in g of th e Cr e k cha nn e l within the Eng l ew ood city limits. Sinc e the com- pl e tion of th s e improve me nts, only minor flooding has occurred on Little Dry Creek. How e ver , because of the inadequacy of s e v e ral br1dges which coul d block flood wat ers , and und er size d drainage cu lv erts, the dama ge c ausing potential of Little Dry Creek remains. Durin g the pr e-war p e riod, oth e r storm d rai n age projects wer e und e r - taken by th e City with the ai d of t h e WPA . The storm drainage sys tems which we re e stablish e d at that time, a nd which still exist, generally follow natural drainage-ways . Althou gh thes e ar e perhaps log ical systems, th e y are not ef fective s torm drains ; rath e r they ar e a combination of clos d conduits, culv erts, open ditch e s , and draina ge swales, which are deficient in actu al carrying capacity. Furthermor e, they ar e a sth e tically unattractive . Many portio ns o f the De nve r Ci t y Ditch have b en e nclosed in th e past, and possibly more s ec tions o f this Ditch will be e n c los e d in the future. Therefore, it is n cessary that the City of Englewood provide a storm draina ge system which is not d e p e nd e nt upon the availability and utility of th e Denver City Ditch as a drainage interce p tor. P r opos e d Drai nag Syst ~ The d si g n of a storm drainage sys tem for the City of En g l wood will b comp rised of thre basic e l e me nts: (1) an ntirely n e w syst em for ar as not pr s ently s erved ; (2) a system d e sig n e d to suppl e me n t or relieve areas inadequately served at pre s e nt ; and (3) the comp l tion of a partially co ns tru cted syste m . Th e propos d dra ina ge sys tem is shown on the accompanying map. The s ystem d esig n is based on the REPORT ON STORM DRAINAGE STUDY FOR THE C ITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COL ORADO, HAROLD HOSKINS AND ASSOCIATES, EN GINEE RS, JUNE, 1961." 1 • ----------' I I I I I I ,. - Basically, the desi g n co nsider ations for the proposed system are : (1) Duration and Intensity of Pr e cipi t ation . The average annual precipitation for Englewood is approxTmate1 y f1fteen (15) inches, with three (3) inches of the total occurring i n th e summer months as rainfall. A summer storm is generally of short duration, but its high intensity creates flooding conditions. (2) Carrying Capacity. For th e storm drainage system to be considered adequate its carrying capacity must be based on a maximum short-duration, high-intensity storm expected to occur, on an average once every two years. However, the downtown area storm drainage system is designed to accommodate a five-year storm volume. (3) Conduits. For reasons of maintenance, safety, space utilization, and esthetics, the storm drainage system should be enclosed . The only exception might be sections of Little Dry Creek where there is the potential for an attractive green strip. (4) Routing. The routing of the proposed storm drainage lines avoids wherever possible, utility installations, areas of utility congestions, existing paved streets and paved open areas. A major link in the City's long-range storm sewer program which was under- taken in 1968, was the installation of over 5800 feet of line varying from 15 inches to 48 inches in diameter in a low area in the vicinity of West Kenyon Avenue and South Santa Fe Lane. This installation has provided protection from flooding to a rapidly developing light industrial area. Flood Plains On the night of June 16, 1965, the South Platte River crested above its banks, resulting in the single worst natural disaster in the State's history. The devastation was particularly notable in the metropolitan area. While it is impossible to predict the actual occurrance of this type of flood, it is possible to realize that such a possibility exists and to plan for its occurrence. The accompanying map depicts the flood plains area of both the 1933 Little Dry Creek flood and the 1965 Platte River flood, and shows the limits of the Standard Project Floods put forth by the Army Corps of Engineers. While the actual Platt e River flood exceeded slightly the Standard Project Flood , it must be noted that the Corps of Engineers termed their flood outlines "conservative " if flood-borne debris , trap- ped by bridge and drop structures , caused "excessive ponding". Such a situation did in fact occur in the June 16th flood when not only lumber but house trailers and wrecked cars became "battering rams" in the raging torrent. 2 .. • ----------- I ' I I I I I I I I I I .. - a - In addition to the destruction to private property, several public facilitie s were hard hit . Some water and sewer plants were rendered in- operable. The number of bridges which were demolished or rendered un- usable created fantastic traffic jams within the metropolitan area in the days immediately following the flood. In the area bordering Englewood, bridges were destroye d on West Oxford Avenue, West Hampden Avenue, Colorado Stat e Highway #70 , and West Evans Avenue . The bridge under construction on Dartmouth Avenue was also wiped out. Only the Belleview Avenue bridge remained intact, and it was closed to public travel for s everal days for repairs. Thus , what was seemingly a "pas sive" featur e on the Englewood landscape--The South Pla tte River-- became a dominant ba rrier . The use to which established f lood outlines are put depends primarily upon public support. The October, 1963 FLOOD PLAIN REPORT prepared by the Corps of Engineers , practically outlined the exact limits of the Jun e, 1965 flood . Ho wever, despite the Corps report, very little was done in the metropol itan area to prevent flood plain encr oachmen t prior to this disaster. Since the fl ood , there has been a pronounced interest in a program of action to prevent similar disasters in the future. Funds have been partially allocated and initial construction has beg un on Chatfield Dam , whic h is to be located at the c onflu ence of the Platte and Plum Creek. Also , the City of Englewood is pres€ntly drafting a flood plain ordinance for controlling land use in these areas . Further coordination of effort with the South Pla tte Area Redevelopmen t Com- mittee, Arapahoe County, Littleton , Sh eri dan , the City of Denver , and the Denver Regional Coun cil of Gov er nm e nts is in process for th e establishment of parks and re la ted development all along the flood plain area. Making use of available flood plain information, reasonable regulations can be imposed upon the development of flood hazard areas which will minimize damage to the uses within the area itself, and restrict the use of floatab le objects which create damag e downstream. Mobile homes , lumber yards, and the storage of vehicles, whether passenger cars , trucks, campers--wheth er operable or inoperable--and machinery should not be permitted in the flood hazard area , in order to minimize the unnecessary obstruction of the chann ls . The Standard Project Flood area of the South Platte River which was es- tablished by th e Corps of Engineers, and reported in October of 1963 in Volum I , R port and Technical Ap pendix , South P latte River, Waterton to Bright on, Colorado, and the Intermediate Regional Flood Area as d signated in Flood Plain Information Volume IV, Denver Metropolitan R gion, Colorado, are designated as the areas to be covered by flood plain zoning restrictions in the City of Englewood . 3 • ------------ I ' - 'I I I I m Q I $ I e I I I r I $ I r I I e e I I p I 0 n I I I - I I I I I I I I I • MASTER STREET PLAN A well-planned and integrated street system is one of the most 1mportant physical features of any modern, progressive community . The major assets of optimum street lay-out and interconnection of vehicular transportation facilities are especially critical in areas where communities are ad- jacent to, or surrounded by, other communities, such as in the case of Englewood. The planned street system of a community not only provides for the safe transportation of vehicles, people , and goods throughout the area , but also serves as a major guide to any future development . The location and planning of future schools, parks, utilities , residen- tial, commercial, and industrial areas , with safeguarding from unneces- sary vehicular encroachment, depends primarily upon street location and the level of service of those streets . Englewood's development has evolved to a form that is directly related to the personal mobility made possible by the automobile. New trends in building d velopment have encouraged automobile and truck usage in much the same way as central urbanization has stimulated the demand for public transportation. Symbolic of Englewood and the metropolitan area at on tim wer the single family subdivision , the one story factory, and the drive-m r staurant; today, however , most representative are apartm nt dw e llings , the two-car family, the shopping center, the motel , and the drive-in bank. In Englewood, as in most American cities, a street system "happen d " long before an organized planning program came into being . Consequently during this pre-planning era, developments took place which eliminated many potential through streets , particularly those traversing from north to south. Among such developments ar the "old" City Park which is now the location of the Cinderella City Shopping Center; the Little Dry Creek Shopping Center; some elementary, junior and senior high schools ; the City Ditch ; the railroad which bisects the western portion of the City; and oth er unavoidable topographic featur s such as Little Dry Cre k and the Platte River. The results in many cases are that a particular street remains at a given lev 1 of service because there are f w, i f any, alternatives. At pr s nt, the Englewood street system , with the exception of som of th newer subdivisions, follows a rectangular or gridiron pattern . This patt rn is compatible with the surrounding communi ies both 1n the l v 1 of service and in th alignment of streets. Of prim 1mportance , when c onsid ring fut ur zoning, land use patt rns, parking facilities , n e ighborhood redeve lopm ent programs, and oth r factors which influenc str t location is th continued continuity of Englewood 's str et pat- tern with that of the surrounding area. This is not to say, how ver , that new patt rns could not be designed and integrated into th s- tablished system. 1 ----- I ' 'I I I II I II I I I I I I I I I • I I I ,. - l t is r ecog n1z ed t ha t changes in land us e , changes in zoning , the intro- duction of commercia l development mixed with residential land uses , and a n ew c oncept in planning would te nd to change the c harac te risti c s of the present traffic f low . Like t h e oth er aspects o f long-range planning , traffic and transportation should not b e consid ered a static or "o ne-s h o t " item. The Mast er Street Plan must b e subject to periodic review , and effort directed toward co n t inu e d coordination with the Denv e r Regional Council of Governments . Continillli re vi ew and r ev ision of eve n the most elaborate and expensive plans are mandatory to meet the changing demands of a growing community. This is the one kind of planning which no community can afford to d o without. Its abs e nc e l ea ds to gross waste , which is often accomplished wit h all the confidence of ignor anc e . The recommendations made in this plan have been limited , to a degree , to me asures that would not require acquisition of additional right-of- way . Nevertheless , should future traffic requirements necessitate e ither additional lan es or a parallel facility , additional property would b e nee d e d . Another matter t hat is of prime importance to the est ablishme n t of a compr e h nsive traffic plan , i s the provision for access to and within th areas that are not now developed. There ar e several rather large areas withi n the City which up to this time hav e been either undeveloped or und er-d e veloped , but which , b ec ause of the s carcity of land and increasea-activity in the south metropolitan area , are now being considered for new construction. Within these areas it wi ll b e n cessary for streets to be dedicated , but because the location and extent of th right-of-way necessary for these streets will d e p e nd upon t h e v e ntual d e v e lopme nt of the land , no effort is b~in g mad e at thi s time t o pr e d ete rmin~ in this Plan, the final traffic patter n . These tracts are indicated on the accompanying maps as areas of "prospective development" within which right-of-way will be required to serve any future uses. To provide for streets in new areas, it is n ecessary for t h e Ci ty to solicit the c ooperation and participation o f the property own er in dedicating right-of-way for the street or s treets which wil l prov1de acces s to that owner 's us e . The wi d t h of the right-of-way must con-, form to pre-estab lishe d standards and the location must tie i n with the e xisting street pattern. The Comprehensive Zoning Ordinanc~ and the Subd1vision Regulations ar the tools throug h which this ac t ion tak s plac e . Fiv of these areas are located in the industrial zo n e d istrict and the sixth is in east Englewood, the site of the former KLZ radio tr ansm itter towers , which land is zoned for multi-famil y residen 1al units. It is to the advantage of the property owner to provide this right-of- way to ac commodate either his own busin e ss , or h is lessee, or his te nan t , 2 ----- I ' • I I I I I I I ·I I I I I I I I I I , - 0 - his customers, or his employees. Without proper access , these areas will not develop to their potential, but will continue to lie idle or in a substandard state. It is the opinion of the City that the burden of providing this access to individual uses cannot and should not be borne solely by the public at large, but that the property owner should share in this program by contributing the right-of-way which will primarily be of benefit to the persona using his property. Without their cooperation it would be moat difficult, if not impossible, for our street system to be developed. Comprehensive, long-range planning can lead to many advantages which naturally ensue as a result of research, analysis, logical thinking, and a practical conaideration of the future. The accompanying map ia designed to summarize the specific propoaals stated in the Ma•ter Street Plan. It should be recognized and accepted that the plan outlined nere-~ill be flexible and subject to reviaion a• unforaeen contingencies arise. If properly executed, this plan provides a baaic tool for im- plementation of a transportation syatem to adequately aervice Englewood's present and future development needa. 3 • I r • 0 • II c e n I r (J I IJ u $ • I n e $ $ I d . . • . I $ I • I I r I · 0 • I I c • II Jl I • - ~ I I I I I I I I I I [I I I I I I II • • - CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT The Ce ntral Business District acts as an impetus for contemporary com- munity growth. It attracts the facilities that serve the city as a whole and those that require close interpersonal contact. The basis of t h e core area is diversified retail business , department stores, and spe ci alty shops . The other major features are the closely interrelated network of business services characteristic of the central area of a modern city: the headquarters of corporations, financial institutions, public administration , and the professionals who serve them. Also grouped in the central area are various supporting establishments pro- viding for entertainment and offering services such as theaters, res- taurants , clinics and hotels . While de fining what the CBD should be however, one of the most important elements is invariably left out--PEOPLE . Without housing either coor- dinated directly into or integrated around the core, the land use remains in service only until 5:00 P . M. Then , it follows the traditional Ame ric an "Metro-ghost town" pattern--stagnating and disfunctional. Be- cause of the proximity to the job market and public transportation, it is suggested that low-income housing be provided within and adjacent to the CBD , and that hi-rise apartments or condominiums be considered. During the 1940 's the eyes of businessmen across the nation began to foc us on Englewood , with reports that the one block stretch along South Broadway had more retail sales than any single block in the nation. In 1951 , the City ranked number one as having the best economic potential. However, in the late 1950 's , several studies were prepared for the City by private consultants because of new competition from downtown Denver and various shopping centers, either already built or being planned in the sou t h metro area. It was recommended 'that for the CBD to remain competitive , it must make an effort to attract a greater variety of services and merchandise, and include in the development at least one maJOr department store. It was also suggested that, if an adequate amount of land could not be assembled for this new development , that consi deration b e given to a location on the land which at that time wa s being used as a city park , and whic h was adjacent and to the west of the Core Area . In 1964 , an election was held , and the voters cboae to s ll tne park and zone it for commerci al development .• Now , in the late 1960 's , thos e early forecasts of promise are beginning to show themse lves . •The park rep lac eme n t program is set forth in the Park and Recreation Section of this Plan . 1 • I ! 'r I • II ' !I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • - The new shopping complex, Cinderella City , IS now located on the former park site after having opened i n Ma r ch of 1968 . Publicity states that the 1 ,800 ,000 square feet of re t ail floor area qualifies this complex for the title of the world 's larges t enclosed-mall shopping center , and it is attracting people from no t onl y the ent ire Denver metropolitan area, but from the entire region . The proximity of Cinderella City wi t h several major department stores-- the Denver Dry Goods Company , J . C . Penney 's , J oslins and Neusteters and many fine specialty shops--t o t he CBD with complementary shops and offices , offers a possibility with planning , coordination and cooperation on the part of all of those persons with an interest in the development of the City--whether property owners, businessmen , professional men or City officials , to develop a total business environment . Unless this effort is made now, Cinderella could turn into a Dr . Jeckel and Mr. Hyde, prov•.ding a delightful , convenient shopping atmosphere for the public, but presenting a great challenge to the City's original established central business district. The downtown shopping area (between South Bannock Street and South Lincoln Street) now has the task of reevaluating itself in r esponse to the demand for a TOTAL shopping environment. Attempts on the part of the Broadway area merchant and property owner either to ignore the businesses in Cinderella City with their large selection of merchandise in a new, attractive atmosphere , or to enter into direct competition with the center , will yield less than maximum success and profits, at best. An efficient network of complementary business , retail and pro- fessional uses, coupled with adequate auto and pedestrian facilities must logically be the goal for all . Included within this program are three areas of general concern: (1) The acquisition of additional off-street parking space in the area between South Bannock Street and South Sherman Street and between East Floyd Avenue and East Hampden Avenue. (2) The development of Little Dry Creek , which flows north- westerly through the southern portion of the CBD, into what potentially could be one of the City 's most a t tractive landmarks . The Creek now flows erratically through a ribbon of trash , muck , and weeds. (3) The most vital aspec t o f the progr am : t he acceptanc e by t he CBD property o wners and me r c hant s o f the need for no t onl y re- modeling the existing buildings and p r ov i ding a broader selection of goods , but also considering a comple t e renovation o f t he older business area--a NEW DESIGN conc eption i nc luding a c o hesive visual appearance , more liberal land use comb i nations , convenient customer parking , and an efficient t ra f f i c program . Obviously the design and working aspects of t hese projects remains a f unction of the concerned property owners , merchants and private enter- prise. However, the City government also has an obligation to work with these parties, in whatever way possible , and can do much to c o o rdinate 2 • ------· -- I - I I I I I I I I • • 0 • their program, to stimulate community interest 1n the redevelopment , and to provide incentive in this ambitious project . Onl y with this combination of effort can the n e eds of the Englewood residents and the more than 300,000 persons within Englewood 's retail "drawing area " be efficie n tly satisfied . If done effectively--if done now--it is estimated that the City will again rank fourth or better in the state's retail sales, giving further credanc e to our desired image of PROGRESS COUNTRY, U.S.A. 3 I • • ·' I I I I f 'T ...... I I I I I I I I • • 0 .. BIBLIOGRAPHY The Englewood Comprehensive Plan presents a synopsis of major features in the City today , along with an illustrative glimpse at Englewood tomorrow. It intends, by no means, to endeavor to present an all- inclusive document guiding the community's future d eve lopment . The intensive, detailed surveys and studies which ar e the basis for any Comprehensiv e Master Plan require such a quantity of text that an attempt to consolidate all the necessary supporting materials produces a volume too detailed and technical for general use . The accompanying bibliography also lists references to the specific ordinances which ar e the basis for this Plan . Public Facilities City of Englewood Document; Montage, Planning Department, 1965. City of Englewood Document; Land Use Study, Planning Department , 1964. City of Englewood Document ; Comprehensive Master Street Plan; Planning Department, 1968. City of Englewood Document; Rules and Procedure Manual, Planning Department, 1965. Englewood Chamber of Commerce ; Facts About Englewood, 1962. Denver Regional Council of Governments ; Regional Open Space Plan Report No. 6807, 1968. Denver Regional Council of Government s ; Public Library, Re port No. 6802 , 1968. Inter-County Regional Planning Commission; Open Space ~ Open Areas in The De nver Region, 1963 . Inter-County Regional Plann ing Commission ; Metro Growth Plan, 1964 . Inter-County Re gion al Planning Commission ; Transportatio n in the Denver Region, 1958. Inter-County Reg ional Planning Commission ; Standards for Urban Develop- ment, 1965. Inter-County Regional Planning Commission ; Community Facilities Study, 1960. 1 . , • • ·. .• \ ( - I I I • , . • 0 • Inter-County Regional Planning Commission ; Recre ation in the Denver Region , 1958. Inter-County Regional Planning Commission : Park & Recrea~ion Proposal , 1964. Bureau of Educational Research -University of Denver ; Recreation-- Englewood, Colorado , 1959 . Larry Smith & Co., Core Area Study Summary , 1961 . Bowes , Watson A . & Harold R., Land Utilization Study for the City of Englewood , 1960. Downtown Idea Exchange Newsletter , Vol. 15 No. 16 , August 15, 1968 , Page 1 . History & Character City of Englewood Document ; Montage , Planning Depar ment, 1965. Englewood Chamber of Commerce ; Facts About Englewood , 1962. Inter-County Regional Planning Commission ; Standards for Urban Develop- ment , 1965. Inter-County Regional Planning Commission ; Community Facilities Study, 1960. Bureau of Business Research -University of Colorado; The Development of Retail Trade in Englewood, 1960. Drainage U. S. Army Corps of Engineers; Flood Plain Informa~ion Study , 1963. U. S . Army Corps of Engineers for Denver Regional Council of Governments ; Flood Plain Information , Big Dry Creek, Little Dry Creek (Arapahoe Co .), ~wooa-Gulch , Weir Gul~ LaRewooa-Gulch, Sourn L&KeWood Gulch , -- Mcintyre G~ LTttle-ury-creek (Adam~),-cFange Hall Cr~Volume IV , Denve~ropolitan~g~ COIOFidO: 1968. --------- Harold Hoskins and Associates ; Report on Storm Drainage Study for the City of Englewood, Colorado , 1964. Wright-McLaughlin Engineers for Denver Regional Council of Governments ; Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volumes _! and .!_!, 1969. 2 I • I I I • • 0 .. City of Englewood Docum e n t; ~ Use Study, Planning Department , 1964. Englewood Chamber of Commerce ; Fac t s About Englewood , 1962 . Inter-County Regional Planning Commission; Metro Growth Plan, 1964. Inter-County Regional Planning Comm i ssion ; Open Space ~ Open Area in the Denver Region, 1963. Inter-County Regional Planning Commission ; Standards for Urban Develop-ment, 1965. Inter-County Regional Planning Commission ; Community Facilities Study , 1960 . City of Englewood Document ; Rules and Procedure Manual, Planning Depart-ment, 1965 . Bowes , Watson A. & Harold R., Land Utilization Study for City of Englewood , 1960. Larry Smith & Co.; Core Area Study Summary, 1961. Central Business District City of Englewood Document ; Montage, Planning Department , 1965. City of Englewood Document;~ Use Study, Planning Dep artment , 1964. City of Englewood Document ; Comprehensive Master Street Plan , Planning Department, 1968. City of Englewood Document; Parking Monograph, Planning Department, 1964. City of Englewood Document ; Traffic Signal Program ; Planning Department, 1967. Englewood Chamber of Commerce; Facts About Englewood, 1962. ---------- Inter-County Regio nal Planning Commission , ~ Growth~· 1964. Inter-County Regional Plann ing Commission; Standards for ~ Develop-ment, 1965. Inter-County Regional Planning Commission; Community Facilities Study, 1960. 3 I • • f • 0 - Bur e au of Business Research , Univ e rsity of Colorado ; The Deve lopment of Retail~ in Englewood, 1960 . Larry Smith & Co .; Cor e Ar e a Study Summary , 1961 . Small , Cooley & Associates · Downtown En g l e wood Traffic Study , 1964 . Downtown Idea Exchange Newsletter , Vol. 15, No . 1 6 , August 15 , 1968 , Page 1 . Master Street Plan ~ City of Englewood Document ; Montage, Planning Departm e nt , 1965 . I I • City of Englewood Document; ~ Use Study, Planning Departm nt , 1964 . City of Engl e wood Document; Comprehensive ~ Stree t Plan , Plannin g De partme nt , 1968 . City of Englewood Document; Traffic Signal Prog ram , Plannin g D p a rtm nt , 1967. Me urer , S e rafini & Me u rer, Inc.; Columbine Freeway Rout e Loc ation & F e asibility Study, 1 9 69. Int e r-County Regional Planning Commission ; Metro Growth~. 1964 . Int r-County Regional Planning Commission ; A Proposal for Reg ional Uniform S t r e t Standards, 1966 . Int r-County Regional Planning Commission ; Transportation in the Denver Re gion , 1958 . Int e r-County Regional Planning Commission ; Standards for Urban Develop-me n t , 1965 Int e r-County Re gional Planning Commission ; Community Facilities Study, 1960 . In ter -Coun ty Reg ional Planning Commission ; Recomme nd e d Tru c k Rout e s , 1965 . Bur au of Busine ss Res e arch -Unive rsity o f Color ado ; Th R t ail Trad e in Engl e wood , 1960 . Larry Smith & Co .; Core Area Study Summar y, 1961 . Small , Cool e y, & Associat e s ; Downtown En g l wood Traf f i c Study , 1964 . 4 of I • • n u I I • • 0 • Bowes, Watson A. & Harold R.; Land Utilization Study for the City of Englewood, 1960. Downtown Idea Exchange Newsletter, Vol. 15, No. 16, August 15, 1968, Page 1. Parks & Recreation City of Englewood Document; Montage, Planning Department, 1965. City of Englewood Document; LandE!! Study, Planning Department, 1964. City of Englewood Document; Replacement Plan for Parks and Recreation, Parks and Recreation Department, 1964, 1~ Englewood Chamber of Commerce; Facts About Englewood, 1962. Denver Regional Council of Governments; Parks and Recreation Open Space, Report No. 6807, 1968. Inter-County Regional Planning Commission; Metro Growth Plan, 1964. Inter-County Regional Planning Commission; Open Space and Open Areas in the Denver Region, 1963. ---------------- Inter-County Regional Planning Commission; Standards for Urban Develop- ment, 1965. ------- Inter-County Regional Planning Commission; Community Facilities Study, 1960. Inter-County Regional Planning Commission; Recreation in the Denver Region, 1958. ----- Inter-County Regional Planning Commission; Park and Recreation Proposal, 1964. Bureau of Educational Research -University of Denver ; Recreation - Englewood, Colorado, 1959 . Bowes, Watson A. & Harold R .; Land Utilization Study for City of Englewood, 1960. Population ~ Land Use City of Englewood Document; Montage, Planning Department, 1965. 5 •• ' r 'f I • • - I I I 0 n D D • • .. - • • City of Englewood Document ; Land Use Study, Planning Department , 1964. City of Englewood Document ; Rules and Procedure Manual, Planning Depart-ment, 1965. ----- City of Englewood Document; Replacement Plan for Parks & Recreation, Parks & Recreation Department, 1964, 19~ Denver Regional Council of Governments; Population Denver Metro Area, 1967. Inter-County Regional Planning Commission; Metro Growth Plan, 1968. Inter-County Regional Planning Commission; Open Space and Open Areas in the Denver Region, 1963. Inter-County Regional Planning Commission; Standards for Urban Develop-ment, 1965. Inter-County Regional Planning Commission ; Recreation in the Denver Region, 1958. Inter-County Regional Planning Commission; Park and Recreation Proposal, 1964. Osborne, H. H.; Englewood Planned Unit Development, 1968. Bureau of Educational Research -University of Denver; Recreation -Englewood, Colorado, 1959. Bureau of Business Research, University of Colorado; The Development of Retail Trade in Englewood, 1960. Larry Smith & Co.;~ Area Study Summary, 1961. Bow e s, Watson A . & Harold R.; Land Utilization Study for City of En g l e wood, 1960. Do wntown Idea Exchange Newsl e tte r ; Vol. 15. No. 16, August 15, 1968, Pa ge I. 6 I • • - n n D D D D I I I I I • • • • REFERENCES Planning and Zoning Commission Denver Regional Council of Governments (formerly ICRPC). City of Englewood Departments: Planning Public Works Library Parks & Recreation City Attorney Municipal Court Municipal Code: Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, #26 of 1963. Police Fire Personnel Building Code, #7 of 1966 , #1 of 1965, #9 of 1956. Housing Code, #17 of 1966. Subdivision Re gulations, #17 of 1967, #14 of 1957. Model Traffic Code , #1 of 1967. Finance City Manager I • • ·' I ! I " n n D D D D D D I I I • • • • . . ·' \ ! ' f ~ I 'f . . . I . • • • 0 - THE KEN R . WHITE COMPANY Me•ltng Address P 0 D rawer 18 289 • Denver Colorad o 80 218 3955 Eest £•postt•on Avenue • Sutte 300 • De nv e r. Co lor edo Mr . Stanley Dial City Manager City of Englewood Englewood, Colorado July 18, 1969 liD . ' It Re: Servicenter 8118 Dear Sir: We have reviewed our work load and believe the Servicenter schedule should be about as follows: a. Completion of final documents -6 weeks-:S Ef' '· 1 b. Review and approval -1 week -,;e:PT. f'! c. Bidding period -3 weeks -s~r r. z 9 d. Review bids and award -1 week -o <. r . " e. Construction -12 weeks -J""' I we are proceeding on the basis of the design development presented to you and will e.-avor to better the schedule where we can. truly yours, WRITE COMPANY DEN :crp Jli l 2 1 \ ' ~ I f .. - I I OII'FICIAL e-ITY CO ~~C::1 L" f2;,'CUM ENT ,fi JL 2 1 '1)9 I COU NCIL 1.1L,_ •I• JG FI LE ern~ OF ENGLEWOOD. COLO. I I I I I I I I I I CITY a .. •N•a.•waaa I ~®(ID® . I CITY MANAa ... • • QUARTERLY I I [ffi(E[p)@[ffilJ II I SECOND QUARTER -1989 I 0 I I I I I I I I I I I II II I II I 'I fl I • • • . ' • Submitte d by STANLEY H. DIAL City Muqer . ' . , .. .· \ ! '!' . . . I . . • 0 • .. ' I ·INDEX· I I TREASURER'S REPORT I LABOR F 0 R C E-PAY R 0 L L-PURCHASING I MUNICIPAL COURT I I POLICE I FIRE I I PUBLIC WORKS I BUILDING INSPECT I ON I PARKS AND RECREATION I I PLANN I NG I LIBRAR Y I UTILI T IES I I GARBAGE COLLECTIONS I . . I ·' I ! • • 'r - • • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • ,._ 0 - ALL REVENUE G ENERAL FUNO U~LI&:.; Uvl~. t"'U NU 2,400 2,250 600 2,100 1,950 1,100 1,650 420 1,500 1,150 lit 360 • c $1, '244,621 -1,200-f $1,161,314 0 A r 1,050 A 1 I z c I 900 WI I ~ 0 v 710~ 600 450 100 150 _I ~FMAM~~ASC NC ~FMAM~~ASCNO BUDGET PRO JEC TION • lxcluctoa $50,000 ltud1otoct for ACTUAL IICIIIITI City Hall roflnancln1. • I I ! I ' 'r • ,._ 0 - BALES TAX RECEIDT. • ALL FUND. 2.oo r t1 ,U2 ,417 1 .71 1.50 1.U I I Ill • c .. , .oo .. I 0 a z I 0 -.. .71 .. -I I I .10 I .21 I .oo .J I I .J F M A M .J .J A B 0 N 0 0 I IUDG IT PROJECTION ---· ACTUAL IICII"I \ ! I ' • '! • - 0 • FINANCE DEPARTMENT REALIZATION OF ESTIMATED REVENUES GENERAL FUND For Montp of June, 1969 • Anticipated Current To Date % of Eat. Revenue ~ Collected Property Tax $ 176,675.00 $ 42,915.70 $ 128,216.43 72.57 Sales Tax 1,515,839.00 103,260.00 647,898.29 42.74 Highway Users Tax 132,000.00 11,159.17 76,150.96 57.69 Utility & Franchise 165,000.00 92,334.68 55.96 Cigarette Tax 84,000.00 7,796.08 45,693.24 54.40 Vehicle OWnership & Registration 93,200.00 15,027.17 52,820.01 56.67 ' Business Licenses Miscellaneous 23,500.00 2,242.00 24,652.00 Liquor Occupational 11,100.00 200.00 10,100.00 Liquor Lie. (State) 1,100.00 101.25 Total 35,700.00 2,442.00 34,853.25 97.63 Municipal Court 30,000.00 3,900.00 27,236.00 91.20 county court Fees 2,200.00 172.50 490.00 22.27 I Other Revenues Fire Dist. Contracts 18,682.00 9,729.00 19,713.00 Highway Maint. 2,600.00 216.66 1,299.96 Total 21,282.00 9,945.66 21,612.96 98.74 I Permits Street 1,600.00 176.00 1,794.00 Building 15,000.00 1,552.50 15,491.75 Electrical 3,600.00 169.20 3,137.95 Plumbing 1,300.00 119. so 743.00 Sewer 800.00 31.00 718.00 Total 22,366.66 2,o48.26 21,884.76 98.14 Fee & Service Chgs. Police 3,000.00 434.75 1,933.50 Library 6,360.00 751.52 4,037.34 Engineering 1,200.00 154.00 322.64 Trailer court 1,300.00 653.00 Total li,aoo.oo 1, 340.27 6,946.49 58.87 I County Library Cont. 30,516.00 8,188.46 26.83 I • • Interest & Misc. Interest 8,000.00 345.43 2,144.75 Miscellaneous 7 ooo.oo 469.05 2,443.88 Total rs:ooo.oo 8!4.48 4,598.63 30.59 Total Revenue ~2,335,512.00 ~200,821.23 §1,168,314.09 50.02 . I I ! . , • ' 'r • 0 - FINANCE DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURES & ENCUMBRANCES CHARGE D TO 1969 BUDGET GE NERA L FUND Fo r Month o f June , 1969 An n ual Current Cu r ren t Bu dset Month En c umb. Legislative & Cou ncil : City Counc il $ 17,018.00 $ 956 .25 Bo a rd o f Ad j . 1 ,925 .00 147 .00 Career S er . 1,120.00 90.00 P lan & Zon ing 2,224 .00 183.55 Public Lib . 600.00 City Attorn ey 33 447 .00 1 5 2 7 .50 Total 56,334.00 2. 904 .30 Municipal Court 18,962.00 1 ,4 94 .47 Management City Manager 48,905.00 4,96 7 .8 3 Pe rsonnel 21 475.00 1 619.16 Total 70,380.00 6,5 8 6 .99 Finance 110,911.00 8 ,0 9 6 .69 $ 7 ,423 .50 Public Works Engineering 7 9,374 .00 5,291.00 Streets 352 ,880 .00 2 7,951.00 Traffic 100 ,440.00 7,2 71.3 2 10 ,4 55 .00 I Buildin g Insp. 6 9 ,2 85.00 4 ,5 4 9 .81 Bldg . Maint . 148 ,810 .0 0 7 855 .70 Total 750,7 89.00 5 2,9 18.83 10,455.00 Fire Dept. 4 02,19 9.00 32,995.79 Po lice Dept. 584,444.00 58,066.39 Parks & Rec. 216,667.00 15,178.66 1,446.00 Planning 44,356.00 5,671.54 Library 112.623.00 7,629.41 General Govt. Ce~tral Ser. 16,120.00 1,510 .6 5 Gen . Oper . 47,026.00 3 ,845.07 Emp. Benefits 17 500.00 Total 80 646.00 5 355.72 Total Expense ~2,448,311.00 ~196 ,898.79 ~19,324.50 • APPROPRIA TIONS Spent & Encumb. To Date $ 9,119. 59 8 57.15 561.44 824 .56 131.8 8 12 231.84 23,726 .46 8,908.21 26,511.12 10 379.85 36,890.97 56,614.71 26,237 .63 143,169.92 53,153.82 30,792 .16 96 1 2 6.66 349 ,4 8 0 .19 189,332 .20 282,313 .89 92,539.52 19,704.3 0 48,582.31 6,951.02 30,728.12 37 679.14 p,l45,771.90 % of Budget 42.12 46.98 52.42 51.05 46.55 4 7. 07 48.30 4 2.71 44.4 2 4 3 .14 46.72 •• ' r .,. I • • I I I I I I I • Water Sales Other Tap Fees connection Chqs. Rentals Interest Miscellaneous Property Tax Total Total Revenue • 0 - FINANCE DEPARTMENT REA LIZATION OF ESTIMATED REVENUES WATER FUND For Month of June, 1969 Ant ici pated Current To Date Revenue Month $750 ,000.00 $14,488.64 $369,788.52 1,000.00 130.80 523.20 10,000.00 3,820.57 17,931.53 4 ,000.00 181.25 2,076.36 15,000.00 279.65 10, 961. 58 2,000.00 6,390.00 12,570.16 295.00 71.86 214. 70 32,295.00 10 1 Ei74.!3 44.277.53 $782,295.00 $25,362.77 S~l<. -: ~. 4 5 ,_ % of Est . Collected 49.30 137.10 52.93 EXPENDITURES & ENCUMBRANCES CHARGED TO 1969 BUDGETED APPROPRIATIONS Annual current current Spent & % of Budget Month Encumb. Encumb. Budget To Date Production Source & Sup. $ 16,724.00 $ 1,978.64 $ 10,954.68 Power & Pump 97,506 .00 10,765.85 35,245.90 Purification 68,567.00 11,251.13 38,694.47 Total i82,797.oo 23,995.62 84,895.05 46.44 Trans. & Diat. 104,323.00 2,488.25 29,938.25 28.70 Administration Account & Coll. 51,369.00 4 ,347.03 25,914.63 General 77,078.00 3,794.60 32,027.22 Total l28,447. 00 8,141.63 57,942.85 45 .11 Debt Service 374,698.00 69,802.05 18.63 Miscellaneous 20,000.00 20,000.00 100.00 Capital Plant & Equipment 91,300.00 20,858.53 $1,627.51 66,805.30 73.17 ' Total Expen•e $901,565.00 f55,484.03 $L627.5l $329,383.50 36.53 -, I· • •' \ ! I 'f I I I I I I I I I • Disposal S ervice Other Conn ection Fee s Conn. Fee s Re s . Cap Add. I nt erest Misce l laneous To tal T o tal Revenue EXPENDITURES & Treatment $ Sanitary System Administration Ace. & Coll . General Total Debt Service Miscellaneous Cap. Plant & Equipment • 0 • FINANCE DEPARTMENT REALIZATION OF ESTIMATED REVENUES SEWER FUND For Month of June, 1969 Anticipated Current To Date Revenue Mo nth $245 ,000.00 $1 8 ,274.93 $131,957.16 2' 000 .00 1 ,007.50 2,911.55 5,000.00 98 5.00 1 0,060.00 1 5,000 .00 791.41 8,834.16 1 ,000 .00 500.00 23,000.00 2,783 .91 2 2,305 .71 $2 68,000 .00 $21 ,05 8.84 $154,262.8 7 % of Est. Collected 53 .86 96 .98 57.56 ENCUM BRANCE S CHARGED TO 1969 BUDGETED APPROPRIATIONS Annua l Current Current Spent & % of Budge t Mon th Encumb . E n cunlb . Bu dget To Date 85 ,401.00 $ 4,840.92 $32,737 .91 38 .33 3 2,4 41.00 2,012.02 17,631.94 54.35 13,362.00 1,107.50 6,561.00 15,671.00 1,278.66 7,028.54 29,033.00 2,386.16 13,589.54 46 .81 72' 113.00 11,050.92 15.32 22,500.00 20,975 .35 93.22 25,600.00 1,500.00 2,473.90 9 .66 Total Expense ~267,088.00 ~10,739.10 ~98,459.56 36.86 . ' • I • • I I I I I I I I I I I I Property Tax Sales Tax Interest Miscellaneous City Hall Bldg . Total Revenue • 0 • FINANCE DEPARTMENT REALIZATION OF ESTIMATED REVENUES PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FUND For Month of June , 1969 Anticipated Current To Date Revenue ~ $ 89,019.00 $21,623.49 $ 64 ,603.09 436,578.00 29,740.00 186,601.71 3,700.00 398.72 1,434.97 2,067.27 so 000.00 $579,297.00 $51,762.21 $254,707.04 %of Est . Collected 72.57 42.74 38.78 100.00 43 .97 EXPENDITURES & ENCUMBRANCES CHARGED TO 1969 BUDGETED APPROPRIATIONS II II City of Englewood School Dist. No. 1 Outdoor Pool Indoor Pool Sports & Games II Cultural Activities Playgrounds Special Events & Programs II Interest Income Other Income Total Revenue Outdoor Pool Indoor Pool Sports & Games Cultural Activities Playgrounds Special Events General Operations Total Expense I • $ • 0 • Department of Finance RECREATION FUND JUNE 30, 1969 Anticipated Current Revenue ~ $24,000.00 17,300.00 $ 747.67 13,950.00 920.54 12,650.00 1,087.16 13,100.00 5,506.50 12,100.00 1,797.89 72 5. 00 1 2,640.00 341.73 100.00 260.89 $96,565.09 $10,662.38 EXPENDITURES To Date % of Est. Collected $12,000.00 50.00 5,174.77 29.91 920.54 6.60 2,152.67 17.02 12,966.14 98.98 6, 521.02 53.89 631.01 23.90 131.32 131.32 459.64 100.00 $40,95 7.11 42.41 Annual Current current Spent & % of Budget ~ Encumb. Encumb. Budget To Date 15,721.00 $ 2,586.55 $ 2,988.73 19.01 20,501.00 1,370.18 4,672.16 22.79 35,966.00 2,466.88 15,720.11 43 .71 18,517.00 2,213.78 8,826.72 47.67 6,177.00 1,971.75 2,025.74 32.79 5,782.00 448.75 1,046.46 18.10 1 0-,..644. 48 935.47 4,233.87 39.78 $113,308.48 $11,993.36 $39,513.79 34.87 . , I . • ' \ ! I ' '!' - II II II II r1 II II II II lJ lJ ll II II II II I • • • • '• RECREATION FUND BALANCE SHEET JUNE 30, 1969 Current Assets Cash In Bank Petty Cash Savings Accounts Revenues to be Received Clearing Account Department of F i nance Page 2 $ 5,559.45 50.00 13,263.49 55,607.89 964. so $75,445 .33 Current Liabilities Fund Balance Fund Balance 0. J. Miller Bequest Appropriatiorts to be Expended $ 8 65 .9 8 784.66 73,794.69 $75,445 .33 I • • 0 \ ! '! • • • • - • • • • '· MUNICIPAL COORT Received from traffic ticket• (c&feteria)-----------------f Received from miacellaneoua offenae•---------------------- Received from court ca.ea--------------------------------- Received from court co•t•--------------------------------- Received from witn••• f•••-------------------------------- Received from jury feea----------------------------------- Received from appeal bond f•••---------------------------- 8,877.00 35.00 3,808.00 775.00 35.00 108.00 12.00 Received from bond forfeiture-------------------------------------~ aoo.oo Arraignaenta----------186 Triale----------------139 Jury trial•-----------11 Juriea excuaed--------6 Total---$13 1 850,00 . , • I • • 0 II II II I I II 1.1 II TOTAL CLASS T CRIMES 1969 1968 1,790 1967 1,210 1966 1,024 1965 971 1964 1,052 * INCLUDIS MUIDII , MANSLAUOH Til , IAPI , IOIIIIY , AIIAULT, IUIOLAIY , AUTO THIPT , AND LAICINY . • 0 • ROO '17e '1eo eo li!!5 .J FMAM.J.J ABONC AI:TUAL O,INIII I CAlli CLUIID II II MINDA CAlM•• rcL••• 11 Oflfi•N•••J* II II II II I I II II • * I NCLUDII DIUNUNIII . AltON , ATT I MTID All ON AND MAL ICIOUI MI ICHII •. ROO '178 '180 111 a _,,.....,,.,::::;;-:;;;::_,.,"" 100 711 eo liS .J~MAM.J.JABONO ACTUAL O,INIII CAlli CLIAIID •' I ( 'r I • • f II I II I I I I II I II II II II 'I I I II • CITY OF lNG~lWOOO 6 .... ~.,;;ps- TOfAL ACCIDENTS 1969 1968 1,494 1967 1,196 1966 853 1965 905 1964 9 2 9 e 51GNALIUO INTIUICTION • 0 - TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS I NUMIII 0' AC:C:I DINTI A T INTIIIIC:TION NAVIN0 1 MOll THAN ONI AC:CIDINT Not e : Accidents occurring near an intersection are often attributed to an intersection for identification purposes . ;~----------------------~ . . -··-·--· ---, ·-.. I • • , I -· \ ! I 'f • - 0 - II LIQUOR OUTLET CALLS--SECOND QUARTER, 1969 II 4-8-69 Magnet Inn Disturbance Disturbance over -partie s released -no charges II 4-12 -9 Hilda's Disturbance Parties left -no probl m 4-13-69 U:tcky Lady Mgr. requesting walk Mgr. asked parties t o leave -I through to prevent parties complied disturbance I 4 -19-69 Lucky Lady Fight in progress Subjects gone upon arrival of officers. I 4-20-6 9 Lu c ky Lady Unwanted parties Subjects left the scene 4-24-69 Golden Fiddle Disturbance Civil matter -no problem I 4-25-69 U-Tote-M Adult purchasing beer for Juveniles filed on by t his minors department. Adult to be filed on by state Liquor Div. I 4-26-69 U:tcky Lady Fight starting Parties told to leave -complied I 4 -26-69 Bar Harbor Female going berserk Party released to mother 4-26-69 U:tcky Lady Fight starting Argument settled -parties se on their way I 4-26 -69 U:tcky Lady Fight Unjustified complaint I 5-11-69 Hilda's Disturbance 2 male parties involved in f gh t- parties advised how to sign c omplaint I 5-24-69 Hey Louie Unwanted party Party left at request of offic r 6-10-69 U:tcky Lady Drunk party Civil problem -no incident I 6-17-,69 Bar Harbor Fight Party had gone, however, had broken windows and b ttl es I before leaving 6.:27-69 Studio Lounge Minor disturbance Barmaid having problems with I obnoxious customer -manager wanted no action taken 6-2 -69 John W's Fight in progress Party sent home by bus I 6-2 -69 Englewood Liquors Drunk -disturbance Party transported born e by officer I 6-28-69 Bar Harbor 2 men with hammers Several parties gone pr ior to I • • threatening customers arrival of officers -one mal party arrested and charged witb disorderly conduct II 6-28-69 Bar Harbor Fight in progress One male party arr sted and I charged with disorderly conduct . , · . .• I ! ' • I I I I I I I I I I • • 0 • FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL APRIL MAY JUNE 1969 Fire and R scue c alls answered----------------------------------------------------331 Hose laid , l"-------------------------------------------------------------------2,89 5 Hose laid, l ~'------------------------------------------------------------------4,9 80 Ho se lai d , 2~·-----------------------------------------------------------------13 ,700 Value of City pr ope rty an d con tents expose d and insured-------------------$694,350.00 Va lue of Ci t y prope rty and conten ts exposed and not insured -----------------1 1 ,9 50 .00 Loss of City pr o perty and contents e xposed and insured----------------------20,650 .00 Los s of City pr operty and contents exposed and no t insured---------------------705 .00 Va lu e o f Cherry Hills property and c o ntents exposed and insured------------21 ,600 .00 Valu e of Cherry Hil ls property and contents exposed and no t insured --------------0 .00 Loss of C h e r~;y Hills property and c o ntents expo sed and insured---------------6, 150 .00 Loss of Che rry Hills pr operty and cont nts expo sed and not insur ed---------------n.oo Fire calls answered within the City Limits-----------------------------------------85 Fire cal ls answe r ed within the City Limits-False Alarm----------------------------8 Rescue calls answer ed within the City Limits--------------------------------------216 Rescue cal ls answered within the City Limi ts -False Alarm--------------------------4 Fire cal ls answ r d within Cherry Hills District-----------------------------------13 Rescue calls answered with i n Che rry Hills District----------------------------------4 Fire cal ls answer ed wi thin the County-----------------------------------------------1 Rescue ca lls answered within the County---------------------------------------------0 Mutual a id ca ll s (Englewood Assisting Ot he r Distr i cts)------------------------------6 Mutual ai d call s (Other Districts Assisting Englewood)------------------------------0 Averag man atten dance per call---------------------------------------------------2 .8 Training S s si o ns------------------------------------------------------------------48 Manpower used---------------------------------------------------------------------937 Fire Inspection s------------------------------------------------------------------148 Hydrant ll oo k-ups-------------------------------------------------------------------17 CITY OF ENGLEWOOD -F IRE CALLS ONLY RESIDENTIAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------33 BUS I NE S---------------------------------------------------------------------------16 A UTO~ BILE-------------------------------------------------------------------------19 GRASS A D TRASH--------------------------------------------------------------------17 FAL E ALARMS------------------------------------------------------------------------8 I • • .• I I I or - I I I I I I I I I I . ,. I I I I I I I • ·. FIRE & RESCUE CALL& TOTAL CALL S F i re 1969 1968 586 1967 1966 1965 1964 Rescue 685 FIRB PA•v•NTIQN IN•P•CTIQN • TOTAL INSPECTIONS 1969 1968 953 1967 941 1966 542 1965 1,181 1964 895 Total 1,271 978 869 891 857 • • • r 180 160 . ... 140 Q) .0 § z 120 100 10 180 160 140 120 ... ..8 100 ~ 10 60 40 20 L ·----1968 ,, I\ '' ' I,, \ \ ~ \ I'\ i ' • I \ / \ ' \ I ' I V \ r,\/ I -Jyl\i -~ \ I \. l J FMAMJJASOND -~--· 1 9 6 8 ·-~----" •• I • • J ·' I I I 'T - • • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ·J I • • 0 • . . FIRE DEPARTMENT ~--. ~- 1 !;.;----1' -·· 2 n41111 QUART lEft If-,_...,~. ''1 • ..... f.---: :· 1 :. : I , , -·" f-I -~L ~-~~i~ .. ,; ; ::::! 1. • /" .. • 11:..!:• ... i l:ol.-~ ''-' .. ~.. ..:·: ~ ~~ . 7 ..... .. ·~-LJ ~ ~"' • -··· II -r,O -~'' 1 ~~-.. !{~h Q.=~~'7 ~ l I ·H~-r+-:-~·"T#-1 1 14++-+++.LLL~~ 1ui..J.,iWJ~ ... 0 =-1:-{ .. M ,a . 1 II li n ..1::::::::; 1 :: •• ..JI...!J_,: ;. J'l; II I Ii I. _J h 11 .. ••• • T ~ I I IT J+llo-lr-HI-1-hV' _ ___._..._"-1- ,:; J • w -r illl ~N...+ .. ...r"n...l...t-l-..u...L.~ ..... _ ENGLEWOOD ::~ 1 ~ ... i l Cl i COLORADO _'',; I/·· II . 0 ~-~ P-I •I •.••. ~'·· ..._ ••• ~ .... . .L b& I CIT'I' 01' .... u .. ooo f I .. 1111 I 1 ..... I ~ I I::· .. ~ ... . ~ ) ~ rn~-~---~~~, . / (k;..Pl· H-H+++-1--'', .. ,.~, IIJ.-1-1:11)....1...4..11 .. .. -· 1' ~rr --: ,, ,&. ~.J , fr+--r'+-++++<eH+Q....!...j....W--W.-.J . ·- ·~'''\; L .. ,. ~ . • ... ~ --f•• • --.. -7;7 •l H-t-~L H-h++I-+++++-W-1-1--1, L_ __J-.... /.; \ r-.~-~~~=t;;.:::;,;:::.~· ~<=td r::a~· ~,_.t----"tH-+1 tttrrr+n~~.~-t1 ~ -H-~it+H ...... •• ;::::n: f:::-::= .--: I ' -'" ~ ,,.,,, /i"7'h1T •. J _ 1 :· •• -....~ ... \ r ~ .... !.-h=,l ~ • 0 0 0 0 • FIRE CALLS 8RASI aTRAIH o AUTOIIGeiLI • I . • ftlltDINCI o IUIINCa • 'ALII ALARM A • • · . ·' I I I or . I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • ·, i----1 ••. j-,.Jw .•. I I 1---1---;:::·· f--~f .. RESCUE CALLS CALLS 0 • 0 • FIR[ DEPARTMENT 2M QUARTER 0 • 0 . . 0 . , 0 I· • ·' \ ! I 'f I I I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I I I I • • • • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTKENT REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO Second Quarter, 1969 ENGINEERING OPERATION NUKBER Street ~ alley cut permits Curb , gutter, walk ~ driveway permits TRAFFIC OPERATION Street Striping Curb painting Cross-walks painted Parking Stalls painted Signals Removed Signal Maintenance Signs installed Signs removed Sign maintenance Signs baked Counters Counter maintenance Shop maintenance Equipment maintenance Miscellaneous TOTAL HOURS 240 25 8 57 9 405 332 142i 88f 109i 70 22i 77 48 336 2,018 117 46 NUKBER 141 ' 500' 300' 130 167 bulbs replaced 681 588 185 ·. • \ , " • . I . • I I I I I [ [ I [ I I I I I I I I I I • ' SIGNS INSTALLED, REMOVED & MAINT, ANNL "A L :\IAN-HOURS 19(19 196 I, 59:1 I9G7 I, 431 1966 I, 351 1965 1,401 1964 I, 493 STREET BTRIPINCJ ANNUAL TOTAL FEEl' 1969 196 136,890 1967 204, 710 1966 299,150 1965 295, 580 1964 422 ,625 &ICJNAL& INBTALLI!D REMDVI!D & MAINT. AN ALMAN-HOURS 1969 196 3, 301 1967 2, 365 1966 1,43 1965 I, 393 1964 I, 561 • 0 - (/) 300 '"' 5 :X: I 200 ~ Ill ::;: 100 100 +' 80 0 Q) ... '"d 60 ~ (/) 5 .<: 40 E-< 20 5 r ,., J FMAMJJASOND .,-~-~ 1968 ;\ t\ -1969 f \ i \ ~~, I \ . \ I \ ,, ' I \ I ' \ , ' " \. v . J FMAMJJASOND -~-~-1 968 -19()9 1\ I \ ,, , .. , \ l\\ I' .J \ / \_j \ Vv/ \ \l ' ' J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 ·~-,-~ 1968 ' < I • • .J I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • 0 • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO Second Quarter, 1969 STREET OPERATION Supervisory • clerical Trash Haul Dirt Haul • Excavation Gravel , Sand , & Rock Haul Base Material Haul & fill holes Patching Drainage Clearance Flusher Operations Street Sweepinl Street Sweeper Maintenance Loader Operations Loader Maintenance Blades Operations Blades Maintenance Building Maintenance Pumping 96 Mower Operation 96 Mower Maintenance Miscellaneous Equipment Maintenance Trucks Pickups Rollers Misc. Small Equipment Safety Stickers Natches Court Maintenance TOTAL NUMBER 1,575 461 267! 123! 462 2,3136 762! 43! 692 502 210! 52 608! 46 93l 505l 50 lOt 989 334! 63 39 24 40l 83 10,377 QUAMTITY MILES 320.09 tons 1,605 C.Y. 2800 Mi. I· • .• \ ! • 'r - I I I I I [ [ [ [ ·I [ [ I I I I I I I • A8PHALT LAID TOTAL ANNUAL TONS 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1,580 1,485 1,379 1,267 2,272 TOTAL ANNUAL MILES 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 9,239 9,708 10,259 8,149 10,011 "' Q) .... ..1 ::e: • 0 • r-, 250 200 ;'\ !"' Ul s:: 0 (-< . \ \ 150 r v \r 100 / \ \; ~ I I J r-r-1,. A M JJASOND 1968 -1t69 ~ ., 1200 1000 800 600 400 L J I· • J FMAMJJASOND __ , ___ 1968 ___ , ... . , .• \ ! ' '!' - I I I I [ r [ [ [ • 0 • BUILDING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITIES YEARLY NON-CONFORMING USE RESGISTIL~TION & SURVEY CHECK CONTRACTOR LICENSES ISSUED PROPERTIES CLEANED UP BY CITY BUILDING, MECHANICAL & SEWER TAP I NSPECTIONS DOCUMENTS PREPARED FOR FILING OR RECORDING TRAILER INSPECTIONS IN MOBILE HOME PARKS WRECKING YARD INSPECTIONS 0 197 TOTAL BUILDING INSPECTIONS ALL TYPES OF INVESTIGATIONS AND PRE-INSPECTIONS HOUSE CODE INVESTIGATIONS IJ SEWER CONNECTION NOTICES ISSUED CONTACTS MADE ---HEALTH, FIRE, POLICE [ I I I I I I I I • NOTICES ISSUED (trash, weeds, junk, etc .) NOTICES ISSUED TO CONTRACTORS TO OBTAIN LICENSES & PERMITS MISCELLANEOUS CORRECTION OR STOP ORDERS ISSUED ABTEMENT NOTICES OF ILLEGAL USES TOTAL MISCE LLANEOUS INSPECTIONS ESTIMATED MILEAGE TRAVELED MEETINGS OR CONFERENCES (Trade, Code, etc.) CASES FILED FOR COURT SECOND QUARTER 1969 0 1,703 8 504 35 2,250 501 74 (' 149 • 481 70 31 7 1,313 6,997 27 23 I • • •' \ ( 1 . , '!' I I I I r r [ [ r I r [ I I I I I I • • 0 - BUILDING DEPARTMENT PERMITS ISSUED FOR: NO. OF NO. OF ESTIMATED PERMITS BUILDINGS COST One fami ly dwellings 4 4 $ 67,490.00 Two family dwellings 1 1 14,000.00 3 unit dwelling 1 1 35,000.00 20 Unit Apartments 4 4 333,900.00 31 Unit Apartment 1 1 103,230.00 Add ition s to dwellings 32 44,118.00 Garage s and Carports 27 27 43,655 .00 Commercial Buildings 8 8 1 ,886,084 .00 Commercial Additions 15 414,462.00 Indu s trial Bu ildings 7 7 261,282.00 Industrial Additions 3 62,063 .00 Church Addition 1 12,605.00 High School Additions 2 68,535.00 Miscellaneous Buildings 1 4,500.00 Moving and Wrecking 5 2 1380.00 Sub Total 11 2 53 $3,353 ,303.00 Mov ing and Wrecking 14 $ 9,225.00 Misce llaneous 209 196 ,452 .00 Signs 27 15,645.00 Heating 97 368 ,077.00 Electric 137 110,663.00 Plumbing 74 2471919.00 Sub Total 558 $ 947 ,981.00 ~ ..£Q._ 53 $4 1299.784.00 INSPECTIONS MISCELLANEOU S Building & Mechanical (Zoning, Sewer, Litter, 2250 1313 OTHER REVENUE: Contractor Licenses .•••.•••.•.•• $ 5,198 .00 Mo b ile Homes.................... 301.00 Use Tax .•••••••.•••••••.••••••.• 1 3,045 .79 Total Other Revenue $18 ,544.7 9 TOT AL REVENUE ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION SHOW AN OVERALL INCREASE. PERMIT FEE $ 191.50 48 .00 105.00 813.50 243.50 22 7.00 201.00 3,363.25 1,013.50 72 2.00 179.50 39.00 no fe e no fe e 36.00 $7,182.75 $ 73.00 1,066.00 160.00 1 ,582 .50 1,216.85 837.50 $4,935.85 $121118 .60 Wrecking Yards) $3 0,66 3 .39 1969 Total Buildings Total Permits Total P rmit Fees Tot al Estimated Va l ue Co ntractor Licenses SECOND QUARTER 31 573 $ 6,991.00 $2,723.790.00 $ 4,566 .50 Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase $ 22 98 $ 5,127.60 $1 ,575,99 4.00 $ 63 1.50 - I • • I I r [ [ [ [ r [ [ r r I I I I I I B UILO ING PERMITS I S SU ED Ac' '\1 T l Tt\1 1 b9 19 8 2 I J1 j 1 t 7 1 '7 4 1 ':/t'lO 1 1 7!) 1 5 l ~~-tc 1 (>4 l, CO LLAR VOLUME OF PERMITS 900 800 700 600 500 500 400 300 200 1 969 1 968 1 967 1966 1965 1 964 l.. /\ / ' $1.4,101 ,22 8 $1 617 7 4 10 0 $ 41 758,287 $ 2,225,215 $ 11 0 41 757 /' / I 'v ,---., I 'I 1\ I I \ I f \ I \ ~ J F M A M J J A S 0 N D • J • - 300 8 0 60 40 k 'lO .0 I 0 '\ ~. 'lOO 80 60 40 'lO ; A .... /r~ ·' A • l I I ' • I , \J' I \ I ... :. ..-< 0 n •1 s In ;l 0 .... : l • J! ~/ \/ I V L ; ..J }FMAMJ Jt>SON D ----I ~68 -----1969 1000 BOO 600 400 ., I I \ ' \ ' \ I \ I ' I t . I I t /' J' I i I I I ' I I \ \ \ \ / J FMAMJJASON D IN SPECTI ON S TOTAL ANNUAL I~SPECT!O 'S 1969 1968 121981 1967 1 2 ,287 1966 9,115 1965 7,810 1964 ('l ,0 1 5 GROUP I k Building , m chanica! & con~truc Jl •. Q) .D 196 8 -----,,., -----g :.-~ GROUP I I Zoninq, wre kinn !• td~, ~~ed'1 tc . 196&---19&9 I \ , ' - I I r r [ [ [ [ [ [ r r [ I I I I I I • • 0 • PARKS AND RECREATI ON DEPARTMENT PARKS MAINTENANCE OPERATION S : Summer mai nt en a nc e s chedule started o n all pa rk s. Bat es-Logan and Dartmouth parks we r e fertilized in early sp ring , u sing commerc ial fe rti l izer. Assumed care and mainten ance of Floyd & Girard median s tr i p s . S pecial Pr oject s: Ins tall e d r a ilings for train and walk bri d ge at Belleview park . Co ns truct ed s teel f ramew o rk fo r s cout c ounc il fire . In s talled n e w s c o rebo a rd at Bell eview pa rk. Repai r ed numerous park areas dam aged by heavy ra i n s and floodin • RECREATION ACTIVITIES : A New program s s tarted durin g second quarter of 1969: 1. Jr . American Track (5th & 6th grad e-boy s girls) 2 . Munic i pal Softball Leagues ("A", "AA " & "AAA" -3 t ans) 3. Softball Leagu e (f El!lal e -8 teams ) 4. Arch e ry cla sses (boys & girls g r ades 5 through \2) 5. Baton Twirling and Acrobatics (youth -1st grade & up -s pec ial cl ass for 5 year olds) 6. Dramatics clas s (youth & adults 7 years and up) 7 . Jr . Olympic track (boys & girls-grades 5 & up) 8 . Old Timers Baseball pro gram (boys 8 through 17 years) (a) Regular Leagues (Panther, Arapahoe & Englewood) (b) Ba seball School (8 year old boy s ) (c) Ed Johnson League (15 t hrough 17 years) (d) B L egion baseball team (15 through 17 year s) 9. Summ er Playground s (seven)-(l st throu gh 6th gr aders) 10 . Tiny Tot Playtime (4 and 5 year olds) 11. Red Cros s Learn-To-Swim (y ou th 7 years of age & up) 12 . Tennis cl asses (youth & adult) 13. Tennis Team (youth 8 year s of age & up) 14. Ceramic a nd Clay Mod e ling (youth 8 throu gh 18 y e ar s) 1 5. Flytying c l ass (adult s ) 1 6 . Small Craf t s cla ss (Ca noes , Ro wb oa t s , S ailboat s) • I • • f - I I [ [ r r [ r r I r ( I I • Parks & Recreation Department P age -2- • 0 • 17. Tadpole Class (s wi mmin g instruction fo r 5 & 6 year olds) l B. Competitive Divin g (youth) 19 . Synchr onized Swim (youth) 20 . Re d Cross water S afety Aid (youth) 21 . Swim Lesson s (adult s) B. Pro gran s in progress during s econd quarter of 1969: l. Jr. Amer ican Wr estlin g (4th, 5th & 6th grade boys) 2 . Fine Arts cla sses (adults & youth) 3 . Social Dance cla sses (adults) 4. Ceramics cla ss es (adults) 5 . Businessmen's Exerc ise and Fitness clas s (B .E .A.F .) 6 . Youth Square Dance classes 7 . Adult Sq u are Dance (Castoff s ) B . Family Square Dance group (Family Swingers) 9 . Family Square Dance class fo r beginn e r s 10. Round Dance cla sses (adults) 11 . Fencing (youth & adults) 12 . Teen Canteen s (Flood & Sinclair Jr . High) 13. Wei ghtlifting (youth & adult males) 14 . Drop-In-Sport s (boy s and gi rl s Jr. High age & up) 15. Learn -To-Swim Lessons (youth B year s & u p) 16 . Swim Team (boy s & gi rl s 6-17 years) 17. Red Cros s Life Saving (Jr. & Sr .) lB . Handicapped Swim Program 19. Sweet Adelin s (adult wom e~ ch o ral group) 20. Physical Fitness class (women & girls 15 years up) 21 . Skiing Club (youth) • I • • ·' I ! I 1' I I [ [ [ u u u I [ I • Parks & Recreation De partment Pa ge -3- 22 . Earl y Bird Swi m (a dult men) • • C. Other activities durin g second quart er of 1969: 1. Ol d Timer Ba seball Rally was held May 24th at the Engl e wood High S chool Field Hou s e. 2. Old Time r Ba s eball registration wa s held on Ma y 25th at the Miller Bu i lding . There are forty teams registered in the baseball program. 3. Jr. Am eri can Wrestling Tournament wa s held at Englewood Hi gh School Field House on May 3rd & 4th. 4 . Jr . Am eri c an Track meet was held at Englewood High School Field on May lOth & 17th . 5 . A Pre-Season AA Invitational Softball Tournament was held at the Englewood Bell eview Softball Field over Memorial day weekend. I • • I ( I ! - I I [ [ [ ~ r u I [ r I I I • • 0 • RECREATION ATTBNDANC• 60 r TOTAL ATTENDANCE 1969 1968 205,571 1967 208,061 1966 184,634 1965 181,941 1964 197,070 LIBRARY CIA:ULATIDN TOTAL CIRCULATION - LIBRARY & BOOKMOBILE 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 272 ,666 251'' 255 204,138 242,611 250,951 b() s::: ..... "d s::: ., ~ ~ < ., ...... p. 0 ., p.. "d a ., g .c 56 52 48 44 40 36 32 28 24 20 E-< 16 12 8 32 31 30 29 28 27 Ill 26 .!>( 0 25 0 III "d 24 s::: cd Ill 23 g .c 22 E-< 21 20 19 11 17 ., \['v f\ ~ I \ I ' I ' I ~.._~ I \ I \ ' \,~,~-~ \,,.) \ ' \ I . • \ ' \ L .J J F M A M J J A S 0 N D 1968 -----.... - I I • Boo ks Circulated: Out of City Count: Englewood Area : Littleton Ar ea : Litt l eton City: • 0 - LIBRARY 2nd Qtr., 1969 Library Bookmobile Library 7 ,390 3,064 1,224 11,678 54,619 23 ,246 Bookmobile 7' 352 520 420 8, 292 Total: Books Added: 1,553 Books Discarded: 210 Book s in collection as of 6/30/69 : 65,218 New Cards Issued : 1 ,37 1 Non -resident : 1 Renewal s : 596 Englewood: Li ttleton: Englewood: Littleton : Patron Card ho lde rs as of 6/30/69: 19,186 909 Englewood Area: 8 Littleton Area: 448 Englewood Area: 3 Littleton Area: 383 70 122 23 77 ' 865 Total 14,742 3,584 __hlli 19,970 Records Circulated: 943 Slides : 61 Pictures: 90 Films: 46 CCPLS requ est s : 339 Comm . Center Reque sts: 11 Books rec'd : 241 Films o bta ined: Te lephone reference i nquiries answered : 167 Group Vis its : 52 Sto ry Hours : Dis bu rsemen ts : De posited with t h e Ci ty Treasurer's Offi c e Recei p ts : Non-resi d ent fee Rental Book Income S pecial Donor 's Fund and Los t Book s Fi nes 13 Reference: 104 Film Hour s : Total 33 2 $2,68 3 .86 5 .00 9 1.70 503 .56 2,083 .60 $2,683 . 6 • I • • • I - I r r r r I r II ~ II If ~ • • - WATER TI=IEATED "' s:: 0 ..... 600 500 ..... 400 c Cl s:: 0 :::: 3 00 "' s:: 0 ...... ...... Cl Cl s.: 0 ..... ...... ..... ..... :-=: 2 0 0 100 ~ 200 180 160 140 120 100 .J FMAM.J.JASONO.JFM AM.J .J ASONO 1968 1969 L ~ .JF M AM.J.J A S ONOJ F MAMJ JA S OND 1968 1969 • -· . ------ I f - I • BEWEA TAP8 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1969 1 9 6 8 1967 196 6 1965 1 964 18,257 17,949 17,686 17,38 5 16 ,879 10,088 10,030 10,04 2 9 ,9 6 8 1 4 ,618 • 0 - r 6 00 4 00 20 0 19 ,000 . 100 _/ 20 0 11 ,000 J FMAMJJA SON D 10,200 190 110 170 '-160 ., .0 150 ~ z 14 0 130 120 110 10 ,100 90 10 70 60 so I • • 40 J ----· 1 tlt • ' I I I - I • • Cl.T'V OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORNX> JUL 2 1 '59 COUNCIL . BOA.."U> OJI' AO !U3 l'E:N'l' AND At>PEAL'5 S PECIAL E'JIJ""G~~I I'<J!S ,Fi i,~69 Wooo. coLo. Chili n Stan :ahorlus c:a lled the meeting to order at 8:00 P . M. • • i!BERS PRES m, Wetterstrom, p· tchford, Rhodus, Clayton, M"!zen 1! BEHS Ai3S ~Tl': llo e Kells aggoner, Director of Public Works Cr _i_q_Rah~!ill..~ on ital 3425 South Clarkson Th .,ppJic•nt; l~<Jl'e :Jt.: a v. r."ance to pertit the erection of a bODpit31 t-· ildi;tg nitl tJ. C!U'lOpy 2ppro:cimately 25 f e t Wi.de to project into h requir d front y r appr oxi~:~utcly 1 5 fE:et . This is an -3-B zone nich J~~~ire a 20 rt. front yard setback . This is an e ng in ~'rt:d .::a· qr.Ld canopy t o ro":ect tlle patienta "'hen alight.ing from cara. t! pro~ r.rty han bee. ~or ton j te • s 111 et. :l.ng. 'l:Operly po ted and advertised for Publi.c He a r i n g 'J'here uas no one in oppo i t i on at the meeting . held ezc mov d, P itchfol."d sE;conded, t "' ..,riance be granted to install canopy as r-equ est d. ~ye : tterstro"l, ?it,.."lford, Clay~cn, Ue:r;en, Rho us l! y : •one Absent: •on Case No . 69-41 29•!6 West Union J4, 1969, ee tlng o the Board the applicant requested a or perm i u~~n to operate a ~all flower shop in an R-1-& r sicential zone. A Public Hearing was was to render a decision at tonight's meeting . c t rs~r~~ econded . tn t h _ Board of Adjustment and Appe~ls fl opt the fol ow.iJ q wriU:r·n fi nding t-.nd decision as the finciings d c1sion of s a id . ~d. ' a that., l a pon the ttc atimony, cxhi:bi tn ld t ion suh~itt~ tc the Bo rd at the public g hdd on y 14. J 9 9, es ·ell as upon n lrulp ction oubj ct pr.oper y, ard the surrouncing neighbor hood , The Board finda as !c•l lm.~s: 1 Tha t ll proce~ural r equirements of the o rdi nance, including , but not; .&. i ted to , publi c notice and publ i c h earing have been me t b y the pplic ant and the Bo a r d . I • • ' • • 2.. That each of the conditions required to exist in order for this Board t o exercise its authority and d i scretion to grant a variance, as set f orth in Section 22 .2-6c of Ordinance No. 26, Series of 196 3, do not, in fact, exist insofar as the subject p~operty i s concerned . 3 3. That, in addit ion thereto, the f o l lowing factors militate against the granting of said variance . a. The Bo ard holds this is not an occupat i on customrily incident to the principal use as a residence. It is, therefore, the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals that the varinance applied for should be d~1 ied and the applicant ia directed to comply with t he ~uilding Inspector 's order to c•ase the operation of the retail flower sho~ within fifteen (15) days. The aforesaid motion was passed, upon the following vote . Ayes: N ys: Wettera·trom, Pitchfor.d, Rhodus, None ezen Ab~ent: t ne 4r. Cl yton waa not present at the Public Be aring on this cas ~. therefore, he ab3tained from voting. Dall s '1 ourney 31SC So. University Case No. 69-6A 4100 South Bannock HE.lc.olm Collier3 Jr. at the February 5, 1969 meeting of the Board wa.s gi\•c n a vnriance to erect two apartment buildings with a total of 36 un1.~ • 'l'he variance permitted a front yard setback of 10 f t . and a rear yard setback of 20 ft. and allo\\!ed parking in the side front yaxd along Oxford. Mr . ~ourney is interested in tl1 e property and \·;anta ~o change the locution of t he buildings and pa:~:king . ae would ~1 ve t .-a buildings ·rith a total of 46 units and \iiOuld maintain t11e r. rr.e front und rear <Jetbacka and the parking \iiOu ld not be a long O.tford. ':.'he property has not been reposted. Cl yton moved, Pi-.:.chf rd eecond~d. the a7ended p lot plan be accepted and granted a propo~ed -the setbacks will not be changed. his i& merely a rearrangement abd does have enough oi:f-stre e t parlting. Ayes: -etterstro.n, Pitchfc,rd, ezen. Clayton, Rhodus may-t Nays one .Ah cntt one Bill Crouch Chryoler PlYlil(?Utb Case blo. 69-46 5001 South Broachray The appl ·ant. has encroacblnenta dated 12/ll/64 and 3/26/68 permitting the encro c:h:ment. of 6 ft. chain link fence to be 18 inche o behind the to encroach 8 f t. upon City property. st· tea he has since pu.rc:hucd or p operty -C&pr Auto at 5084 So. Acoma and motel building and ~and Avenue has been vacated, therefore. he is requesting a total eneroacilment of 606 feet a long South Acoma Stree·'-· 'this will include the old encro chment and new encro c:hment. . ' I • • • • • • Clayton moved, ~zen c e con.d e d , t h at the proposed encroachment be recommended to tile Council for thei~ consideiation. P..yes : e t'l:.e rstrOOl , Pitchford, l .J.ezen, Clayton, Rhodus Nays t None Absent e None Englew.Q~.~·.:::e:.:r:.-:o:;.;:f::....;:Co==· :n.:.:;l er=•c;.o~· ~----,...--~ 180 "Kest Gi rard Case No. 69-47 The applic3nt :s reques~~ng the cncroa chnent of a planter on City property . ':i:~l y pl n to c ... plet.ely .e!llodel the ir b uilding . A briclt planter -17 ft. 10 in. in :length 'rould encroach upon City property 5 ft. 6 in. Thi would be approxima· ... ely six :.nc h e b ehind an existing 4 ft. walk. Clayton vcd, czen ,;econded, t.bat the p:roposed encr oaclmlent be recasnended to the Counci t for their consideration. Ayes : We ttcrstr~, P i t~for d, 11-e:r:en, Clayton, Rhodus s ~ys : o ne:! l\bo~nt a ::o ne Case Ro. 69-48 '!'he apoU.Ca.!l"i:: ie requ s t il-g encroachment of parl'..ing over City property a distance of 13 f e e t fo~ a ppro Ki a tely 90 ft. This iB now a dirt a~~~p en the bv~k of their prope~ty a t Gal8Pago and Hampden. C)-yton nlOV€d , He:teu &ecor.ded, tl1 propo e d ncroac::hi.::ent be recommended to tbe council f: ~ their c:onaiderati.on with the fol ~.ow ing tipulations t l . tor in as ?Ublie PaT.king 2. v ~ and maintained by Ayes: wetteratr o , ~i:chford, Rhodus, Mezen, Clayton nays~ Rene Ansent.t fif one Case No. 69-49 501 W st Hampden e applicant r .qkestec permias i on to install 5' X 10' ground sign ·hlch will b 7 inch e a off of t h ground. 'fhe ordinance states ground sign muot h v 2 f t. cle arance f ro the ground. This sign is located o it will not be a tr ffic h zard . Ay Nays: Absent a Wettereton, Pitchford, Rhodus, Mezen, clayton. None None . , I • • - • • Al i ce Glenn case Ho. 69-50 695 East Floyd The applic ant reque sted p e rm ission to erect a 6 ft. basket weave fence around a portion of the rear yard a long Floyd Avenue. This fence is well bac k from Washington S treet and is approximately 25 ft. from the alley, therefore will b e no tra f fice hazard. Clayton moved, Mezen seconded, the variance f or the f ence as requested be granted. Ayes: Nays: Absent: W~tterstrom, Pitchford, Mezen, Clayton, Rhodus None No n e There being no .further bus ines s to come bef ore the board the meeting was adjourned at 10:00 P. M. Susie Schneider Recor ding Secretary AP PROVED·-------------------------- I • • • • • • TBIS AGBKDDT, .. de and entered 1Dto ... tb.l~ '.;:'" daJ of -+"-----· 1H9 , bJ and betweea SOV'I'B CL&USOlf COIIPAKY, • co-partnereblp , partJ of tbe flret part , wblch expreealon r r ahall include h18 , her or tbelr helre , executor•. adalaiatrator•, aaent• or •••1108 where tbe context eo requires or adalte , and TBK CITY OF DGLDOOD, COLORADO, partJ of the second part , which expre•eion includes ita belr•, executor•. adalnlatratora , aaente or ass11o. where tbe context so requires or adalta , 1f ITJIBSSJ:TII : WBERBAS, the partJ of tbe flr•t pert owns and bas tltle to that real estate and real property located ln KD&lewood , Couatr of Arapahoe, State of Colorado ,de•cribed •• follows : .. 11DD1DI at • point 147.5 feet west of tbe soutb- eaet corner of Block 8, Bil&las ••alewood Gardsae lJlnl la tbe aortbea•t 1/4 nortbea•t 1/4 , aectlon !. TIS , R881f of tbe 8tb P.M.; thence north and alODI tbe ., .. t line of tbe eaat 1/2 of Block 8 . 539 .1 feet to a polat oa tbe •outh line of u.s. BllbwaJ Ill : thence ea•t aloas ••1d south llae 22 .0 feet to a point; theace aoutb and parallel to tbe we•t line of the eaat 112 of aald Block 8 , 139 .2 feet to a polat ; theoce w .. t 22 .0 teet to tbe point of beainalDI . Aim ftDUS, tbe partJ of tbe second part de•lr .. ID ••• ... at for the iaetallatloa, .. lntenance , repair and replace- .. at of • eaaltarr •••er .,.t ... ROW TBKRaroRK, lt is berebr aareed •• follow•: The partr of tbe first part does berebr ,rant , •••laa , aad aet ower to the partr of tbe ••coed pert •• ••• ... at for the laatallatloa, .. lateaaace , repair aDd replac ... at of • aaaitarJ aewer •r•tea. Tbe party of tbe first pert •ball fullJ use and eajor tbe afor .. aid pr .. 1•••· except ae to tbe rl1hte herein 1ranted ; aDd the part7 of the aecoad part berebJ a1re .. to bold and •••• tbe aa ld part, of tbe tlrat part baral .. • froa aay and all daaa1• arlelnl fro. lte ••• ot the rlabt , eaa ... at , aad rl&ht -of-waJ berelo araated aad •1r•-to paJ ••r .... ,. or •••-wbicb ••1 arise to tbe propertJ , preal• ... or rl1bt of tbe part7 of 0 I ! '!' I ' - • • the first part through second party's usa, occupation, and possession of the rights herein granted. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and suh thh . -: day of /q t)' , 1969. -7 PARTY OF THE FIRST PART: PARTY OF THE SECOND PART : CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 8)' __ ~~~-----------------Mayor -I- I . \ ! I ' 'T • 0 - TO: City Council FROM: Stanley H. Dial, City Manager I 'I "1; ? I ·~n 1., couNc C ll"y IL 1\ft. OF C:N '·'I "G GLcwo. I ILE: oo c DATE: Juiy 19;1969 SUBJECT: TRAFFIC PATTERN STUDY Recently a plan was submitted to Council outlining the extension of the present one-way system; this was discussed It a recent study session of Council. Council requested that other engineering studies be made before the actual extension takes place. The extension of the one-way system will be deferred until the following engineering studies and cost analysis can be accomplished. 1. Keeping Bannock one-way south but extending it from Yale to Chenango. Making Cherokee one-way north from Yale to Chenango. 2. Changing Bannock to one-way north from Yale to Chenango. Making Cherokee one-way south from Yale to Chenango. 3. Making Floyd one-way west from Downing to Bannock. Changing Hampden back to two-way from Logan to Bannock. It will take approxi mately on e month to complete the studies; therefore, you should have a report by the August 18 or September 1 Council meeting. ~~;J~~ • STANLEY H. DIAL City Manager SHD/mm ... I • • . , .. · \ ! f • • J • TO: FROM: SUBJECT: All City Employees Citizens and City Councilmen Stanley H. Dial, City Manager • 0 - DATE: Jul y 18 , 1969 Closing of Municipal Offi ces , Monday , July 21, 1969 Upon the request of the President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, a nd in recognition of th is h1storic occassion --man's fir ;t ::tempt to explor the moon--he municipal offices and Public Library of the City of Englewood will be closed for regular business on Monda y, July 21, 1969 . :;> Th regul a rl y sche duled Cit Council m eting on Monday, July 21, 1969 at :00 P.M . in th City Council Chambers will not be affected b th se closi ng of municipal offices and will be conducted as schedul d . All emergency services a nd services directly necessary for the public health and safe t will be provided as on week-ends . STANLEY H. DIAL City Manage r SHD/mm .. ·' I I '! I • • ' • - TO: All Me mbers of t he E ng l ewood City Council F RO M: Mr. staril ey H. Dia l , City Manager DATE : July 19, 1969 SUBJECT: C OMING EVE NTS CALENDAR ~ :;> MONDAY, July 21, 6 :00P.M. -JOINT PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE-CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Hampden West Restaurant. MONDAY, Jul y 21 -€ITY HALL OFFICES & PUBLIC LIBRARY CLOSED MONDA Y, July 28 th, 7:30P.M. -POSSIBLE STUDY SESSION: Confe r e nce Room A. T o discuss fire-police hea dquarters construc tion, the compre hensive zoning plan, the serv i c e cente r and othe r ite ms. THURSDAy I FRIDA y I SATURDAy I July 24th, 25th, 26th - INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVE BOARD MEETING: City Manager and Assistant City Ma nager in Colora do Springs. Mr. Chuc k Carroll a ppointed a cting c ity mana ge r. MONDAY, August 4th-CITY HALL CLOSED: Colorado Day is legal holiday . TUESDAY, August 5th -REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, AUGUST 18 th, 6 :00P.M. -JOINT BOARD OF CAREER SERVICE COMMISSIONERS-COUNCIL MEETING: Haclmey House Restaurant. Regula r Ci ty Council m e eting follows. n.espectfully, -~-~;-/~~ • STANLEY H. DIA L City Manager SHD/mm CC: Mr. John Criswell, City Attorney Mr. J. Rob ert Mack, A ssistant to the City Manager .• I ! "!' I ' • • T E NTATfVE A GEN DA FOR REGU LAR C O NC IL SESSION J ULY 2 1, 1969 :00 P.M. a ll to o r ct r , inv ocat i o n by t h Re v. J 'rr} Sp r ingston o f th e Fi r s t Chn s t ia n Churc h, pl edg e of a ll gianc e led by Bo ·o ut Troo p No. 9 2, a nd r oll ca ll. I. Mmu t e s . (a) Regul a r m e e ti ng o f Jul y 7, 196 9 (Cop ies tra n s mitte d he rewit h .) (b) Specia l meeting of J ul 14, 196 9 . ( opies tra ns mitt d he r e with ). 2. Pre-sc he dul ed c iti z e n s and visit or . (a) R e cognition of "s pe cia l guest s " o f th Co un c il. 3 . Communications. (a ) Minutes of the Wate r and Sewe r Board m e eting of July 14, 1969. (Copi es trans m itted he r e with.) (a) Me morandum r e comm e nd i ng th e acqui s ition of the Denve r City Ditc h. (b) Memorandwn r ecomm e nding a pprova l of Suppl ement No . 15 with the Va ll ey Sanitation Distric t to provide service to Ce nte nnial Park. (c) Me m o r andwn r ecommending a lette r bE' pro- v ided Va lley View He ights subdivision a ssuring the City 's inte nt to provide s e rvic e to Valley Vi ew throug h the Valley Sanitation District. (d ) Me mora ndum recomm e nding a l e tter be pro- v ide d St. Ma r y's School assuring the City 's intent to provide service to a 100-acre s ite in Cherry Hill s if a sanitation district is formed. (b ) Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of June 17, 1969. (Copies herewith trans mitted.) (c) Me morandum from Judge Haydn A . Swearingen, Municipal Judge, recommending the appointments of Mssrs. Ri ch a rd L. Eason and Donald C. Hanne m a n as a s s istant municipal judges . (Copies he rewith transmitted.) I (d) Memorandum from Mr. Kells Waggoner, Pubti"C""WO-rks Director, r e garding a schedule for a tra ffi c patte rns s tudy. (Copi es herewith transmitted.) (e) Lette r from Ke n R. White Company r ega r di ng th s c he dul e fo r c on s truc t ion of a Servi cente r. (Copi e s he r e w ith trans m itted.) (f ) ME'mo r a ndurn from Chi e f Cl yd e Ha ll , Ac ting Police Chi e f, r ega rdi ng licen si ng of dogs·. (Copies he r ewi t h trans mitte d.\ (g) Ci t y Ma nage r's Qu a rterly Report. (Copi es he r e wi th t r ansmitte d.) I ! '! I f • • 4 . City Attorn y . (a) Ordinance on fin a l reading creating s id e walk Improvem e nt Di s trict No. 69 . (Copi es h e r e with transmitted.) (b) Choi 5. City Mana g e r. (a ) Ma nager's choice . 6. Recognition o f non-sc heduled citizens and visitors . 7 . Ge neral discussion. (a) Mayor's choice. (b) Councilma n's choice. Adjournment. ~~~/1-b~ City Manager SHD/mm I • 0 ' - ) • • ,_ - Law Offices JOHN A.· CRISWELL O FFIC I A L C ITY COUN C IL Dl'CU MENT Edward G. Qonovan 3755 South Broadway Englewood . Colorado 80110 Phone 761·0800 ~· To: From: Subject : Gentlemen: J:JL ? 1 'G9 CO UNC I L ML L ,-I<,!G FI LE CITY OF E NGL EWOOD, C OLO. Mayor and Councilmen City Attorney Resignation July 17, 1969 When I was first appointed City Attorney in April, 1965, the position was one which called for only a "part time" effort and I accepted the position with the clear understand- ing that I would not be giving up my private practice. I in- formed the then Council that I estimated that I would be spend- ing approximately fifty per cent of my time engaged in City business. Since that time, the responsibilities of the City's le- gal department has increased considerably. Indeed, the work of the City Attorney, and of his assistants, has increased to the point that, even with an assistant working nearly full time for the City, it has been impossible for me to adequately attend to the City's business and to engage in a private law practice at the same time. As a result, while I have hesitated to make the decision 1 since I have thoroughly enjoyed the work of the City Attorney s job, it has become increasingly evident that it is necessary for me to resign from this position if I desire to maintain a private practice. For this r eason , I s h ould like to be relieved of my re- s ponsibi l ities as Ci t y Attorney a s soon as conveniently pos- s ible, bu t, i n n o e v ent, later t han November 1 , 1969 --a per i od of approx i ma tely one hundred days from now . I recognize t hat i t ma y take some time f or Council to select a successor and f or the attorney thus selected to be- come fam H iar with the pending work of the office. I would be most happy to cooperate in any manner with my successor to make the transition as smooth as possible. Indeed, there may be certain matters which might be moat expeditiously handled by me, rather than attempting to have a new attorney become familiar with them. I would be happy to continue to handle these matters I , • To Mayor and Councilmen July 17, 1969 Page 2 • 0 - on a mutually agreeable basis, but,' based upon my own past experience, I would suggest that any decision as to whether I should do so or not should be left for the sole determina- tion of the new City Attorney. In this regard, I have been authorized to state that my present assistant, Mr. Edward Donovan, has indicated that he would be willing to resign from his position or to continue with this work, at Council's pleasure. However, in view of the fact that any Assistant City Attorney must, of necessity work closely with the City Attorney, I would suggest that this decision also be left, to some considerable degree, solely within the hands of the newly selected City Attorney. As a final note, let me say that I shall always view the past four and one half years as one of the richest periods of my life. Very few people, I think, have the opportunity to take a direct part in programs designed exclusively to bene- fit people as a whole. As City Attorney for the City of Engle- wood, however, I firmly believe that I was a 'part (although my personal contribution may have been a small one) of a group of people who initiated programs, the results of which show that this City justly deserves the title, "Progress Country , U.S.A ." I appreciate this opportunity and shall recall, with on l y the fondest of memories, the persons, whether members of Council or of the administration, with whom I was privileged to work during this period. cc : City Manager I • • ' - • • 0 • QFFIC f\C CliY COUN' \l. r r U'· E JT {IF\\' (Decision No . ~57~ fY..Q Uo CIL • ~ BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTI LIT! ES COMMI~(tl' OF ·NGLE:. · vOU . .::oLO. OF THE STATE OF COLORADO · - * " * IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE DENVER TRAMWAY CORPORATION FOR AU THORITY TO INCREASE CERTAIN FARES AND FOR OTHER RELIEF INCLUDING DISCONTINUANCE OF ROUTE 31 TO APP LICATION NO . 23769 \~ESTMI NSTER . Ju ly 14, 1969 Appearances: Raymond B. Danks, Esq. , Denver, Co 1 or ado, BY THE COMMISSION: for Denver Tramway Corporat 1on; Max P. Zall, Esq ., Denver, Colorado, Brian H. Goral, Es q , Denver, Colorado, and James W. Spelman, Esq ., Denver, Colorado, for the City and County of Denver; Howard Hicks, Denver, Colorado, for the Denver Chamber of Commerce; Mrs . John D Anderson, Golden, Co l orado, for the League of Women Voters; Morr1s Adelman, Denver, Colorado, for the East Side Act1on Center; Sarah Wolf, Denver, Colorado, for North Denver Action Cente~ and Stapleton-Globeville Coord1nat1ng Committee; Harry A. Galligan, Jr , Esq ., Denver, Colorado, for the Staff of the Commiss1on S T A T E M E N T On June 5, 1969, the Denver Tramway CorporatiOn (Tramway) f 1led i ts application with this Commission seek1ng authority to e s tabl1 s h an increase in certain fares and charges in i ts trans1t system and au hor 1ty to discont i nue Route 31 The appl icat1on was set down for hear1 ng on June 25, 1969, at the hour of 10 o 'clock am , in the Hear 1ng Room of the Con•nissi on, 1845 Sherman Street, Denver, Colorado, at which t 1me and pla ce the matter was heard by all CommiS Sioners after due and proper not1ce to all interested parties At the conclusion of the hear1ng on J une 27, 1969, the matter was taken under advisement by the Commission I • • I \ : I '!' - • • 0 - The Applicant herein, Denver Tramway Corporation, 1s a corpo- ration organized under the laws of the State of Delaware It 1s duly authorized to conduct business in the State of Colorado as a common carrier of passengers by motor vehicle, under author1ty granted by th1s Commission, by virtue of Certif1cate of Publ1c Convenience and Necess1ty PUC No. 210; and generally serves the metropolitan area of Denver, Colorado . follows: Applicant seeks authority to increase fares and ch arges as A. An adult fare of 35¢ shall apply on routes and port1ons of routes listed below: On Entire Route s Route 3 -Englewood ' 4 -E 4th Aven ue -Lakeshore 5 -South Gaylord -Argo 6 -E. 6th Ave -w 44th Ave 9 -York St 15 -Colorado Boulevard 16 -Stockyards 18 -Brentwood 19 -Airport -Fairmount 23 -Brighton Boulevard 28 - E. 28th Ave . -Berkeley 40-Park Hill 50 - E. 22nd Ave . -Kalamath 55 -Federal Boulevard 60 -Loretto He1ghts -Harvard & Yates 64 - E. 34th Ave - W Colfax Ave . 73 -Down i ng St to Thomas Jefferson School to George Washington School On Po rt1 ons of Routes Route 8 -(University Park -Edgewater) between po1nts 1n Denver except1ng the Route 8 Un1vers1ty H1lls Express . 13 - 14 - 17 - 59 - " 75 - 82 83 84 - (E . 13th Ave -W 38th Ave .) between po1nts in Denver . (Colfax-Aurora) between points 1n Denver and between po1nts 1n Denver on the one hand and points from Yosemite to Geneva Streets on he other hand, except1ng the Route 14 East Colfax Express (Garfield -E. Louis1ana) between points 1n Denver (Federal Center) between po1nts in Denver (Barnum - E Lar1mer) between points in Denver (Arvada) between po1nts in Denver (Ol1vet) between po1nts in Denver . (Golden) between points 1n Denver . -2- I • • ·' \ I I 'r • • 0 The Appl ic ant herein, Denver Tramway Corporati on, 1s a corpo- ration organized under the laws of the State of Delaware . It 1s duly authorized to conduct bus in ess in the State of Colorado as a common carrier of passengers by motor vehicle, under author1ty grante d by th1s Commission, by virtue of Certificate of Publ1c Conven1ence and Necess1ty PUC No. 210; and generally serves the metropolitan are a of Denver, Colorado . follows: Applicant seeks authority to increase fares and charges as A. An adult fare of 35¢ shall apply on routes and port ons of routes l is ted below: Route « On Entire Routes 3 -Englewood 4 - E 4th Avenue -Lakeshore 5 -South Gaylord -Argo 6 - E. 6th Ave -W 44th Ave 9 -York St 15 -Colorado Boulevard 16 -Stockyards 18 -Brentwood 19 -A1rport -Fairmount 23 -Brighton Boulevard 28 - E 28th Ave -Berkeley 40-Park H1ll 50 -E. 22nd Ave . -Kalamath 55 -Federal Boule~ard 60 Loretto He1ghts -Harvard & Yates 64 -E 34th Ave - W Colfax Ave 73 -Downing St to Th omas Jefferson School to George Washington School On Port1ons of Routes Route 8 -(University Park -Edgewater) between po1nts 1n Denver except1ng the Route 8 Un1vers1ty Hills Express . « 13 14 - 17 - 59 - 75 - 82 83 - 84 - (E . 13th Ave - W 38th Ave ) between po1nts in Denver . (Colfax-Aurora) between points 1n Denver and between po1nts 1n Denver on the one hand and po1nts from Yosemite to Geneva Streets on he other hand, excepting the Route 14 East Colfax Express (Garfield - E. Louis1ana) between points 1n Denver . (Federal Center) between po1nts in Denver (Barnum - E Lar1mer) between po ints in Denver (Arvada) between po1nts in Denver (Ol1vet) between po1nts 1n Denver . (Golden) between po1nts 1n Denver . -2- I • • . , • • 0 .. B. On the above routes and port1ons of routes for a ch 1 ld six years of age, or over , but und e r twelve yea r s of age a fare of 25¢ cash shall app ly C. On the above routes and port i on s of routes for a student under ni neteen years of age at t end1 r.g publ1c or paro ch1 al schools a fare of 25¢ cash s hal l apol y D. On Route 8 Univers i ty Hi lls Exp r es s an adult fare shall be 45¢ cash, or valid transfer and 10 ¢ cash The fare for a child or student, as above defined, shall be 30¢ cash, or valid transfer and 5¢ cash E. On Route 14 Colfax Express to a ~d fro m oo1nt s e dst of Geneva Street an adult fare shall be 60¢ ca sh , or val1d transfer and 25¢ cash; the fare for a ch1l d or student, as defined above, shall be 40¢ cash, or valid transfer and 15¢ cash . On Route 14 Colfa x Expre ss to and fr om points west on Geneva Street, and adult fare sha l l be 45¢ cash, or val1d transfer and 10¢ cash; the fare for a child or student, as defined above, shall be 30¢ cash, or valid transfer and 5¢ cash F. The adult zone fare on the follow 1ng routes ou tsi de Denver for a passenger paying a Denver fare will be: Route 8: 13: 14: 17: 59: 75: 82: 83: 84: 15¢ cas h 15¢ cash Between Yosemite and F1t zs 1mons Hosp1ta l - 15¢ cash 15¢ cash 15¢ cash 15¢ cash 48th & Harlan to Carr and Oberon Road -Zone 1 - 15¢ cash ; Carr and Oberon Road to 72nd and RR Crossing -Zone 2 -15¢ cash; 72nd and RR Cross1ng to 82nd & Alk ir e Street -Zone 3 - 15¢ cash 44th & Sher1dan to 51st & Carr -Zone 1 15¢ cash; 51st & Carr to 44th & Youngf1eld -Zone 2 - 15¢ cash lOth & Sher1dan to 10th & K1pl 1ng -Zone 1 - 15c cash; lOth & K1pl 1ng to U S. #40 & Indiana -Zone 2 - 15 ¢ cash; U ~ S #40 & Indiana to 12th & Ford (Gol den) - Zone 3 -15¢ cash The adult fare on the above routes for a passenger board ing and al1ght1ng outs1de Denver w1ll be 35¢ plus the 15¢ zone fare for each zone beyond t he board1ng zon e 1nto which the passenger r1des G. On the above routes outside of Denver the zone fare for a child or student , as def1ned above, pay1ng a Denver fare will be 10¢ for each zone 1nto which the ch1ld or student rides If the chil d or student boards and a lights out s 1de of Denver the fare will be 25¢ plus the 10¢ zone fare for e ach zone beyond the board1ng zone 1nto wh1ch the ch1l d or s tudent r1de s -3- I • • . ' • • 0 .. H. An adult shall pay 5¢ for a transfer on all routes where transfers are issued I . The charge for the shopp1ng pass sold for use 1n the down- town area will be Increased from 30¢ to 35¢ In support of its application, Tramway wi tnesses 1ntroduced exhibits showing a continuing decline of passenger use, beg1nn1ng with 1947 continuing through 1968 . It was also shown that operating m1les had declined during this same period of time, although not as rapidly as has the number of passengers carr1ed Of more spec1f1c 1n erest was page 9 of Applicant's Exhibit 2, which page was a comparison of total operating expenses with total operating revenue For the f1rst 4 months of 1969 operating expenses were very sl1ghtly above the operating revenue However, in May of 1969, the total operat1ng e~penses exceeded the total operating revenue by some $36,000 . Applicant 's w1tnesses stated that this was primarily due to increased labor cost brought about by a new contract with the union employees which went into effect on May 1, 1969 That contract provided for an immed ate 20¢ an hour Increase and subsequent increases of 10¢ per hour on November 1, 1969; on May 1, 1970; and on November 1, 1970 Additionally, the new un1on contrac t prov1des for incremental i ncreases keyed to the cost of l1v1ng 1ndex Page 23 of Applicant 's Exhib1t 2 was an esti mate of ope r at1ons under present and proposed rates for the fiscal yeaf beg1nn 1ng J uly 1, 1969 These estimates Indicated that cont1nuat1on of present fares would result in a loss to Tramway of $426,000 from operatiOns before 1nclus1on of non-operating income and the prov1s1on for 1n come taxes Un der pro- posed fares, the i ncome from operat1ons was estimated to be $26,000 plus non-operating income of $132,000 or net income of $78,000 after income taxes . These f1gures would indicate that the fare 1ncreases re- quested in this application w1ll not prov1de an adequate retu rn on Investment for the Appli cant, but w1l l put Appl1cant 1n a pos1t1ve earnings position. -4- \ ! ! I • • 1- • • 0 • Applicant's witnesses test1f1ed that they have for some t 1me been negotiating with the City and County of Denver on a lease basts, the benefit of which would be to reduce taxes to Tramway Corpo ra t1on by approximately $263,000 per year Such leas i ng arrangement would contemplate the ultimate acquisition of the Denver Tr amw ay Corporat1on by the City and County of Denver Tramwa y wltnesses 1n di cated that negotiations with the City and County of Denver wou ld cont1nue wheth er or not the requested increase is granted by thls Comm1ssion At the hearing a number of publtc w1tnesses appeared and were heard . Witho ut exception these publ1c witnesses were oppose d to the increase proposed by Appl1cant However , lt sh ould be note d that 1n most cases the ob jections amounted to a p lea for r e11ef by people tn special categories . This Commission recogn1zes that the bus transporta- tion is especially important to people 1n lower 1ncome brackets who are unable to afford private transportation ~hi1e 1t m1ght be de sirable tn some respects to dist1nguish between 1ncome levels 1n determ1n1ng ran s - portation fares, it would be totally imposs1ble and 1mpract t cal for this Commission to attempt to make any such dist1nct1on between the classes , Such an attempt would surely be discrl mtnator y In addition to the fare i ncreases proposed by Tramway, 1t 1s proposed by Applicant that Route 31 be discont1nued Th1 s route 1s a shuttle service between Westminster and the No 6 Bus 1n North Denver The testimony at the hearing indicated that the passenge r use of this run was so small as to not warrant the cont1n uance of this route FINDINGS THE COMMISSION FINDS: That the above and forego1n g Statement should be, and here by is, made part of these Findings by reference 2 . That the Commission has J Urlsdict ion over the Appl1cant herein, Denver Tramway Co rporati on, and of the s ub Ject matter involved -5- ,. . I • • . ' • • 0 - in the instant application 3. That the Commission 1s fully adv1sed in the prem1ses 4. That the rates and charges pr oposed by Appl1cant, more specifically set forth 1n the Statement herein, are JUSt and reasonable and not unjustly discri min atory; and that the public convenience and necessity requires, and wi ll require, that such rates s hould be approved by this Commission and should be effect1ve at 12 :0 1 a m on July 27, 1969 . 5 . That Appl1cant herein should be allowed to d 1scont1nue its Route No . 31, which route cons1sts of shuttle serv1ce between Denver Route No. 6 and Westminster Th e publ1c convenience and necessity does not require the continuation of this spec1f1c service . 0 R D E R THE COMMISSION ORDERS: 1 . That the rates and charges as set forth 1n the Statement herein be, and hereby are, approved by thi s Comm1s sion and shall become effective as of 12:01 am ., July 27, 1969 , upon not 1ce to th1s Comm1ssion and the general public by not less than one day's f1l 1ng and posting in the manner prescr1bed by law and the Rules and Regulations of this Commission . 2. That the d1scont in uan cz of Route No 31 of Appl1cant be, and hereby is, approved Such discont1nuance to be effect1ve as of 12:01 a .m., July 27, 1969 3 . That the Commission retains Ju r1 sdict1on of th1s matter, to make such further Order, or Orders, as may be necessa ry in the premises -6- I • • - • • 0 • 4. That this Order shall become effective forthw1th (S E A L) ~;/)r:,EST : ~. TRUE ' CO~-_,/! p7fi/k:rf?r~7fM THE PUBLIC UTILITIES C01MISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO HENRY E ZARLENGO HO HARD S BJELL AND EDl~I N R. LUN DBORG CommlSSloners Dated at Denver, Colorado this 14th day of July, 1969 . William D. Mitchell, Executive Secretary Jk -7- ,_ ' I I . . . , - - :;:; )( ~ 0 tJ ~ '>( ROLL CALL { BR OWN DHORI TY KREI LI NG LAY LONEO/oT/7/ n PARKIN SON SCHWAB • • • <:r § X )( \( X )( ~42 c ~ &?.L-.? 6a4--?a L~ YV ./a ~ I J?lt. /?-:!c. r(?b??V Ct 2-t..<UtlR.. Lo • <U . ~ <../(_ {-, -" E . A1 It" C. ~/( J Jo. ~':t(JQ . . ..... I . . . , 'a - • ~ (@ 0 u ~ ROLL CALL (a_) BROWN DHO RI'fY KREILING LAY LONE PARKINSON SCHWAB • • ·, • <C .A 1 /""-.. './ ./ t~ c.....__.,..--,; ~~7~/-r __...--~ ( / ,-- 7 c ,/ ""~-I :?-.,.. /) ( . ~ { (£(i ' ' / }--~-}.Z.. ......->) ·' c._ ~ "7'5 ( 7 , ) ,/ J-=> ~----____, / • 7 < _.. c '".F l.:.;, ( rc • { < 6'" ) - ~ ~~ ( ? .) __,.-< u ~ c ·--./ - r::> _-=)</ ~ ../ 7 ... ~ ~ ,I . - ~ -/. .,/ -~, (. "' ...--'") " c ./ ;_( I -"'· ,..---/--::, -<:: / __ ;__ -...,,_ -~-~ <.. / .-?'Q I J _,) ~ ~ ~ / ---() ('. ( - • I • • . , - ~ • ~ 0 u ~ RO LL CALL BROWN DHO RI'fY KREILING LAY LONE PARKINSON SCHWAB . - (J) ~ . . . I . ' • • • (J) ;>< § - --< ·. , \ ( '!' I . ' • 0 '2X • -• ·, • ROLL CALL BROWN DHO RITY KREILING LAY LONE PARKINSON SCHWAB . , ~J..............-~~~ · . .. • . I • ,. • f X - ~ • ~ 0 tJ ~ ROLL CALL BROWN DHO RI'fY KREILING LAY LONE PARKINSON SCHWAB • •. 0 • ~ § ,/ v v M5l t/ v v 3 ~ 3 I ~ I . . ·' \ ! I f 'I' ~ • Cl z 0 tJ ~ ROLL CALL ;;: BROWN DHO RITY KREILING LAY LONE PARKINSON SCHWAB • • 0 • z. " r' v v v' "' y I . • • • • • ~ fi 0 u ~ ROLL CALL ~ z BROWN DHORI'rY KREILING LAY LONE PARKINSON SCHWAB 0 }7/a c'~ -c' ;-)" t!-~./ -r ~ _.) ~ ~ / '-rl) ...__, c2 ~~~~? --N . /)(!; c -----..., , f? ~ _5'/ p Lb fJ- f) 0 I C9 ~ ..._ / '~ • L '?~ ( 13 ~ L/ -( --. .._....,:--~ rr->---~ _._. '---" ~ I l I / ..., ·__../'"- J __....../ --;/ _.-' <.,"- { / C- • . -. I • • ;ty 7 )- --2 L ·.' • • r -• • c. ROLL CAL L I . • . , ·· I I I ' • ,. u 01 .J-(~ -VVVl-~ -....___.__/ "o-~-f?" ~~ K - s-/ ~-~ u J;l '• ~='~-~ '" I ~-?~ -e'-::? ( 1y?c) Q__ I~ -~\._ / c ..... - -p-/\.. ,--; ~ _.--...-~ • • • (, I' ...) -.J... ~ '.,-~ • • ;7.:_-:>-:._ ~ / • ...:.o p Lu ~ () 8 -c:_ _.< "' @ ...-;;>. • " • -.::::r- c. ._ ~ (~ '· y t t (t.. t!--0 [ 2 <L ( .9 6_,--./ -_, __ . -~ 7 1\.J s :1 (L) Lj ..q({ 2 '1- )f • I . • - • ROLL CALL . - • • • I • • ' I - ~ 0 z 0 () ~ ROLL CAL L BROWN DHO RITY KREILING LAY LONE PARKINSON SCHWAB .L o--;;:; -f .J ._--'-- \-=D~ ~/ ( ~ c:__ S-c) 'z_ . ~ Z_ ~-- - -c.~/ -~/ /., ( . _,e..) 3(f)IG 3r/C ? '>. 3(?) • ,_ • • . • • -......___/ ~ I· • - ROLL CALL ~ 0 u ~ ~ BROWN DHORITY KREILING LAY X LONE PARKINSON ., SC HWAB 1 ..Y~) ~ ~JY 4(6 ) ~-----~ G 7 ~ l. • • • (' ~ z (.' t.t3 ;J.Ps- ~ ;:--~ f • I /~ ___...- / ;)-:.:> ~A \.. / ~0 ,;:;_':;} I _..)--/ ::> 'S-/~/. :~~'3, / (] Y--UJ) ---- '{_ .1 C-·1 "' /d 1{}-1.9 /'"'- ..2--.-<u .3 ao 4 _/ L &r I (it {\ I. 7 ) c./ / 7 7 /- • ~I I • • . , .. ' \ ! I ! • 0 • <. l z 7) -~ILL t f)<--1A ~---7_ ---z:s-~ J /(__ 9 ;r-/-~ 2._ c C?-c-c~ a c::;/ ~ ~ _,. · ----~ ~ CJ _ / ,..-_.,--- /#~----~ ~-_.{_.. / J/~/;_ ~ ~/ / ~ ___-r - 4 I ~ /c ( ~- ~-- • ; I . • .• I ! 1 .,. • • • • • ROLL CALL ~ 0 u ~ r.l ...f&_ ..£ ...Ill_ BROWN DHO RI'rY KREILING LAY LONE PARKINSON SCHWAB _,.. -c--c. t! _(!___ . ~ ci p c (£_ p '-~ _/' ,...--::.) t:-..4 -c ~ 3-s t?; --7- c;-~ ~£J~'<Po? .tJ.?V ~/I(} -~--f ~ -c-~nelZ<-?Jn)~7 ~ & t_~ ;3 ("'7 __, r ... ..! ( -( .J ~--...----,,. , , . I • • - • ~ ~ 0 u ~ ROLL CALL BROWN DHORITY KREILING LAY LONE PARKINSON SCHWAB • 0 • <. A z I) ...-?/?~ --?/ '7) -~ .....--- <?...-//c..~-?---? _../ ~/ ~ c!...__ /) ~ .J_ (_./L ~ ·; r.- ~ s~--- v' .......- ..) • J • 7.~ l / c._.~ t._ / ( c~-C:.~ "' / /' ::;?_ / z. ) -7 c}_ =-c-: -( /7 / -~ (_) &....-~ ~ .;__./ I' ' I _....,<:: ......:1. 9 ~' _,, /_""'t' .-::11 .. ' ~ ' / -/ -"-· ~~a -ce .?tti s ....... --c -, ~ c ~ , <:::-<--L-. ........ :::...---:. .. ~ --~ --~-*.-~ U_t2 ~ .... ,) / -' / ~ ... ---c;~ __.-~.-:;/z_. (,.~ c-: e-I c· -~---;r=' I c - ( .?L ·ld_~ {// _...... ... ,..... .... L.. I -.,.., _) fu....t. ' _/ I <...., ..-(....-)'?.·\. & ( ~ u I • . ' I . . . , .• \ ! ' ' 'r