HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-04-12 WSB AGENDA(.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
AGENDA
ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD
April 12, 1994
5:00 p.m.
Conference Room A
MINUTES OF THE MARCH 8, 1994
WATER AND SEWER BOARD MEETING. (ATT. 1)
LETTER & AGREEMENT FROM BANTA, HOYT
RE: S. ARAPAHOE SAN. DISTRICT & ARAP. ESTATES
(ATT. 2)
SOUTH ARAPAHOE EXCLUSION/SOUTHGATE SUPP. #122
(ATT. 3)
QUINCY & OXFORD CITY DITCH FENCING .
SUPERFUND REAUTHORIZATION LETTER. (ATT. 4)
TURBIDITY REPORT. (ATT. 5)
MEMO FROM DEPT. OF HEALTH
RE: ALLEN PLANT SLUDGE RADIATION REPORT. (ATT. 6)
OTHER.
WATER AND SEWER BOARD
MINUTES
MARCH 8, 1994
ATT. I
The meeting was called to order at 5:02 p.m.
Vice-chairman Gulley declared a quorum present.
222
Members present:
Members absent;
Also present:
Habenicht, Gulley, Lay,
Neumann, Otis, Resley, Vobejda
Fullerton, Wiggins
Stewart Fonda, Director of
Utilities
David Hill, Water Attorney
Joe Tom Wood, Water Engineer
1) MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 8, 19943 MEETING.
The Englewood Water and Sewer Board Minutes from the
February 8, 1994 meeting were approved as written .
Mr. Vobejda moved;
Mr. Resley seconded:
Ayes:
Nays:
Members absent:
Motion carried.
To approve the February 8,
1994 Englewood Water and Sewer
Board Minutes as wr i tten.
Habenicht, Gulley, Lay,
Neumann, Otis, Resley, Vobejda
None
Fullerton, Wiggins
Councilman Wiggins entered at 5:15 p.m.
2) GUEST: DAVID HILL AND JOE TOM WOOD
DENVER/CLIMAX LITIGATION.
The Board received and discussed the following
correspondence:
Letter to Stu from Barry dated 2-4-94
Letter to Marchand from Hill dated 2-4-94
Letter to Seul from Marchand dated 2-8-94
Letter to Marchand from Hill dated 2-9-94
Letter to Marchand from Hill dated 2-9-94
Letter to Barry from Stu dated 2-10-94
FAX from David Hill dated 3-1-94
David Hill, Joe Tom Wood and Stu Fonda discussed with the
Board issues and ramifications of the litigation.
3. COLORADO WATER & SEWER RATES.
The Board received a Comparative Rate Survey for the State
of Colorado compiled by David Griffith & Associates.
Englewood's ranking and the proposed Denver water rate
increase was discussed.
4. CEASE AND DESIST ORDER FOR THE BI-CITY PLANT.
Stu reviewed the Response to the Cease and Desist Order
prepared by the Bi-City Plant. Possible fines and solutions
were discussed. A meeting will be set with the Englewood
and Littleton City Councils to discuss this issue.
5. SOUTH ARAPAHOE CONNECTOR'S AGREEMENT REVISIONS.
South Arapahoe submitted a letter requesting that Englewood
collect a south Arapahoe Sanitation District fee from its
users with the annual bill. Stu recommended giving South
Arapahoe the agreement letter that John Bock has given other
sanitation districts requesting the same service.
Mr. Otis moved;
Mr. Vobejda seconded:
Ayes:
For the Director of Utilities
to sign the letter to South
Arapahoe Sanitation District
outlining agreement to collect
district fees.
Habenicht, Gulley, Lay,
Neumann, Otis, Resley,
Vobejda, Wiggins
Nays: None
Members absent: Fullerton
Motion carried.
6. CHERRY HILLS RANCHO.
The Board received a letter serving as official notification
of the Cherry Hills Rancho Water and Sanitation Di strict's
dissolution along with a copy of the court order. Englewood
was instructed to begin maintaining the service area
pursuant to the agreement and collect the necessary charges.
7. NUTRI-POD REFUND AGREEMENT FROM RBI.
The Board received a letter dated February 25, 1994 from RBI
outlining the refund agreement in the event that the Nutri-
Pod process does not meet the needs of the Allen Filter
Plant.
8. LETTER FROM SENATOR HANK BROWN.
The Board received a letter from Senator Hank Brown thanking
the Board for the comments regarding H.R. 3392, the Safe
Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1993.
The meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m.
The next Water and Sewer Board meeting will be April 12,
1994 at 5:00 p.m. in Conference Room A.
Respectfully submitted,
Cathy Burrage
Recording Secretary
A TT. :2.
"' .
BANTA. HOYT, GREENE & EVER.ALL, P .C.
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
AICMARO .J. •ANTA ATTOR!'<EYS AT LAW RICMARC L... 9.ANTA. JR.
(1912-19931 ST£PMEN G. CVERAL..L.
CARRYL.. '-... ARRINGTON
CMARL..!:5 A . ~UE:CH£NM£JSTER
.JANE 11 . GARROW
.IOMN 1... l='Al-MOUIST
Mr. Stuart Fonda
City of Englewood
6300 SOUTH SYRACUSE WAY, SUITE :5:5:5
E!>l'GLEWOOD. COLORADO 80W·672:5
TELEPHONE (303> 220-8000
FACSL'iILE (303> 220-01!53
March 9, 1994
3400 South Elati Street
Englewood, Colorado 80110
01" COUNSEi..
R . VAL MOYT
FOIC ... AFOO 0. GFOl:l!:NI!:
CRAIG E . WAGNEF=t
Re: South Arapahoe Sanitation District; Arapahoe Estates
Water District
Dear Stu:
As you are aware, AEWD has asked SASD to authorize a connec-
tion for its reverse-osmosis desalinization unit (R/O Unit) . The
R/O Unit produces a highly saline waste effluent that has histor-
ically been discharged to natural drainage and thence to Big Dry
Creek. The Colorado Health Department has prohibited the histor-
ic discharge to the Big Dry Creek natural drainage basin, and has
given AEWD until May to comply. As AEWD lies entirely within
SASD, we have been working with AEWD for some months seeking to
find a mutually-acceptable so l ution. I know that Englewood has
been doing the same. I understand from Holly Holder that you
have been handling those negotiations for the City.
It appears that our talks with AEWD are nearing completion,
without major stumbling blocks. I enclose a copy of a draft
Wastewater Transmission Agreement that is currently under consid-
eration by AEWD. Though there still may be some minor changes,
we are told that the major elements of .the draft are acceptable
to AEWD.
The key to this Agreement between SASD and AEWD is that AEWD
is willing to discharge off-peak so that the design capacity of
SASD facilities, as well as that of the Big Dry Creek Intercep-
tor, will not be impacted by this discharge. 'The reason for this
requirement by SASD is that we do not want the accommodation of
AEWD to reduce SASD's reserved capacity in i~s system or the
Interceptor, which has been carefully calculated to provide ca-
pacity for SASD to the point of ultimate buildout. AEWD under-
stands this concern, and has agreed to construct a tank and other
equipment necessary to implement a time-lock valve system to
insure off-peak discharge.
BA~TA. HOYT, GREENE & EVER.UL, P.C.
. ATTO R N E:YS AT I.AW
As a result, SASD believes that the whole system, including
the Interceptor, will have zero capacity impacts from this con-
nection. We have agreed, on behalf of AEWD, to approach the
other signatories of the Basin Interceptor Agreement to obtain
written permission for this con nection, and a waiver of any re-
quirement that AEWD pay the Interceptor Line Charge or any other
transmission tap fee. AEWD has agreed to pay SASD's annual ser-
vice charge, based on flow volume. This will compensate SASD for
the costs of monitoring the con nection and especially the storage
and time-lock system to insure compliance with the off-peak dis-
charge requirement.
I have written to both Duane Tinsley, Manager of Southgate
Sanitation District, and Don Marturano, attorney for South Engle-
wood Sanitation District, and h ave received preliminary oral
responses back to the effect t h at neither has a problem with the
approach outlined above. I am now providing to you and each of
the BIA signatories an extra copy of this letter with a space
below to indicate approval of SASD's agreement with AEWD, and
waiver of any requirement that AEWD pay the BIA Line Charge,
conditioned upon off-peak disch arge of the reverse/osmosis efflu-
ent. This will allow us to go forward and conclude our deal with
AEWD, .and allow AEWD to go ahead with the construction of facili-
ties necessary to insure off-peak discharge.
Should you have any questions of a technical nature about
this matter, it would probably be better to address them to Tom
Napolilli or Gordon Meurer, at 985-3636.
Note that it is also a condition of our agreement with AEWD
that we have written confirmation that the Bi-City Plant will
accept the R/O Unit discharge for treatment. My preference to
satisfy this requirement would be to have a copy, showing full
execution, of the agreement for treatment between AEWD and the
City.
DLF: jp
cc: Dr. Charles R. Bruce
Mr. Gordon C. Meurer
Mr. Duane Tinsley (w/encl)
Don Marturano, Esq. (w/encl)
Holly Holder, Esq.
BANTA, HOYT, GREENE & EVERALL, P.C.
A P•O,.ESSIONAL CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT L.AW
ACCEPTED AND APPROVED:
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
SOUTHGATE SANITATION DISTRICT
By
Ti-t~l-e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SOUTH ENGLEWOOD SANITATION DISTRICT
..
WASTEWATER TRANSMISSION AGREEMENT ·
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
, 1993, by and between SOUTH ARAPAHOE
~~~~~~------------~~~ SANITATION DISTRICT ("SASD"), a quasi-municipal corporation, and
the SOUTH ARAPAHOE WASTEWATER ENTERPRISE ("SAWE"), an instrumen-·
tality of SASD formed pursuant to SB 93-130, and ARAPAHOE ESTATES
WATER DISTRICT ("AEWD"), a quasi-municipal corporation,
WITNESS ETH
WHEREAS, SASD owns a sewer outfall line ("the A Line"),
being a 27" line passing through the boundaries of AEWD in Arap-
ahoe County, Colorado, and extending generally north and west
where it connects with another SASb facility ("the D Line") which
discharges to the Big Dry Creek Interceptor ("the Interceptor")
owned by Southgate Sanitation District and the City of Englewood,
which in turn extends further north . and west to the wastewater
treatment plant ("the Plant") owned and operated by the City of
Englewood and the City of Littleton; and
WHEREAS, the A and D Lines are operated and maintained by
SAWE, which instrumentality collects rates, tolls, fees and
charges for the provision of wastewater transmission services;
and
WHEREAS, AEWD owns a water treatment plant which utilizes a
reverse-osmosis desalinization system ("R/O unit"), the discharge
from which has heretofore followed natural drainage to Big Dry
Creek; and
WHEREAS, the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado
Department of Health has determined that such discharge is envi-
ronmentally detrimental, and has ordered AEWD to discontinue such
discharge to Big Dry Creek; and
WHEREAS, AEWD has secured from the city of Englewood an
agreement to accept the R/O unit discharge for treatment; and
WHEREAS, AEWD has requested permission to discharge into the
A Line for the purpose of transmitting the R/O unit effluent to
the Plant; and
WHEREAS, neither SASD nor SAWE is required to provide such
transmission service but are willing, in the exercise of discre-
tion and in the interest of public health, safety, and welfare,
to do so under the specific terms and conditions agreed upon by
the parties and set forth in this writing.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE PROMISES and under-
takings herein set forth, the parties agree as follows:
1. The purpose of this Agreement is to permit the use of
SASD facilities to convey wastewater from AEWD's R/O unit. This
Agreement shall not be construed or asserted as the basis of any
offer or willingness or ability on the part of SASD or SAWE to
provide sanitary sewer service to the public generally. The
lines and facilities necessary to transmit the R/O unit discharge
to the A Line shall be constructed in such a way as to prevent
other sewer service lines from connecting thereto. In addition
to any other remedies herein provided, the District shall have
the right immediately to disconnect such lines and facilities
should it be discovered that such lines and facilities are being
used to transmit effluent from sources other than the AEWD R/O
unit, and to charge AEWD the costs thereof. The AEWD system will
be disconnected from SASD facilities, at AEWD expense, if and
when the use of SASD facilities is no longer necessary, or upon
the termination of this Agreement for some other reason, whichev-
er first occurs.
2. It is the intent and understanding of the parties that
SASD's tap allocations, also termed "line charge credits", in the
Interceptor, under SASD's agreements with Southgate Sanitation
District and the City of Englewood will not be affected by its
participation in this Agreement. Should SASD lose any line
charge credits as a result of this Agreement and/or the discharge
from AEWD as herein provided, AEWD shall indemnify SASD, and
shall pay on SASD's behalf, any line charges for which credits
were so lost.
3. It is currently believed that the A and D Lines have
ample capacity to continue to accept the AEWD R/O unit discharge,
in accordance with the terms hereof. However, because the capac-
ity of these facilities has been determined to be sufficient for
the anticipated buildout of SASD without taking the AEWD R/O unit
flows, into consideration, it is acknowledged that any additional
capacity needs in SASD facilities would be caused by the R/O unit
discharge, and no other reason. If and when SASD or SAWE deter-
mines that an expansion of capacity in any SASD facility is nec-
essary to accommodate AEWD R/O unit discharge flows, the continu-
ation of discharge of those flows to SASD facilities shall be
conditioned upon AEWD's paying all costs of such expansion~
4. AEWD shall at all times satisfy, adhere to, and be
bound by all of the provisions, terms and conditions of the SASD
Rules and Regulations, as the same may be reasonably modified
from time to time by lawful action of the SASD Board of
-2-
Directors. A violation of the Rules and Regulations, if uncured.
and continuing despite notice and demand for compliance, will be
grounds for termination of this Agreement.
5. AEWD shall, at its sole expense, construct and install
the facilities necessary to convey its R/O unit effluent to the A
Line, and connect such facilities to the A Line at a point to be
determined by SAWE, and shall be responsible for all permitting
requirements pertaining thereto. All plans and specifications
and methods for such construction, installation, and connection
shall be submitted to the SAWE consulting engineer, and must be
approved by SAWE before any construction or connection will be
permitted. All engineering fees and other costs incurred by SAWE
or SASD in reviewing plans and specifications shall be paid by
AEWD.
6. AEWD shall discharge R/O unit effluent only to the A
Line, and shall at no time discharge any unacceptable or hazard-
ous waste, as defined by the City of Englewood Wastewater Utility
Ordinance as now or hereafter constituted.
7. R/O unit effluent shall not be discharged to the A Line
between the hours of 5:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. or between the
hours of 5:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. daily. The rate of discharge
shall not exceed gpm during the hours of discharge,
except that not more than once each day the discharge rate may be
increased to a maximum of gpm for not more than five
consecutive minutes for the purpose of cleansing the lines in the
AEWD system before the day's operation. These limitations are
subject to change should SAWE find it necessary for operational
or maintenance reasons.
a. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, SASD
and/or SAWE shall at all times have the right, without liability
for damages to AEWD, to interrupt the R/O unit discharge in the
event of a blockage or rupture anywhere within the SASD system.
9. During the term of this Agreement, AEWD will furnish
SAWE copies of all flow charts, analytical reports, tests, and
test results involving the R/O unit discharge. Additionally,
SAWE or SASD may monitor the R/O unit discharge system, and shall
have access to the AEWD system to examine and inspect, provided
there is no unreasonable interference with the operation of the
AEWD system, and no unreasonable administrative burden imposed.
In addition to the charges set forth in paragraph 11 below, AEWD
shall reimburse SAWE or SASD for any costs and expenses incurred
in connection with any examination or inspection which does not
-3-
duplicate information previously provided to SAWE or SASD by AEWD.
10. Upon the execution hereof, AEWD shall pay to SAWE all
of SAWE's and SASD's attorney and engineering fees as incurred in
the negotiation and preparation of this Agreement.
11. AEWD shall meter its R/O unit discharge, and, until
this contract is terminated, AEWD shall pay to SAWE an annual
service charge based upon such flows, calculated on the same
basis as the regular SAWE service charge is ca l culated, as such
method may be changed from time to time. Each year in May or
June, SAWE will provide to AEWD a statement of charges for that
year, which charges shall be payable not later than November 1 of
the same year. In addition to the service charges based upon
metered flow, AEWD shall pay to SAWE a monthly administrative
fee, commencing on the first day of the month next following the
execution this agreementi and continuing until the termination
hereof. The amount of such administrative fee shall be reason-
ably related to SAWE's actual costs in administering this agree-
ment, and shall be established each year by SAWE at the time of
the adoption of the SAWE budget, and AEWD shall be promptly noti-
fied of the amount of the fee for the following calendar year.
For the calendar year 1994, the fee shall be One Hundred Dollars
($100.00) per month.
12. AEWD shall indemnify and save harmless SASD and SAWE,
their officers and agents, against any and all claims, damages,
actions, or causes of action and expenses, including attorney
fees, to which they or any of them may be subjected by reason of
or in connection with the construction, operation, modification,
replacement, maintenance, repair, or removal of the AEWD R/O unit
discharge system, or the use of SASD facilities by AEWD.
13. This Agreement shall not be assigned, sold or trans-
ferred by AEWD without the written consent of SASD or SAWE.
14. This Agreement shall not be used as a legal defense or
prohibition to a mandatory consolidation of all existing sewer
collection systems and facilities into a single governmental
entity created to assume responsibility for sewer service in the
area in which both SASD and AEWD are a part, under statutory or
constitutional authority, as may be the case.
15. This Agreement shall terminate immediately upon the
occurrence of any of the following:
a. The City of Englewood refuses, for any reason, to
treat R/O unit discharge;
-4-
b. AEWD commits a material breach of any provision
hereof and fails to cure the same within a reasonable time after
service of written notice of breach upon it, which notice shall
identify with particularity the act or omission complained of and
the date by which cure is demanded;
c. SASD or SAWE determines that, notwithstanding all
efforts to regulate volume and times of discharge, the SASD and
SAWE become unable because of impairment of capacity to fulfill
their obligations hereunder existing as of the date hereof; or
d. AEWD no longer requires transmission of its R/O
unit effluent.
Upon termination of this Agreement, the R/O unit shall
be disconnected permanently from the A Line at AEWD's sole ex-
pense in accordance with all applicable regulations of governmen-
tal agencies having jurisdiction, including without limitation,
the Colorado State Department of Health. All work involved in
such disconnection shall be subject further to the approval of
SASD or SAWE, and AEWD shall pay all of the costs for inspection
and other engineering fees reasonably incurred prior to such
approval.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands and
seals, effective the day and year first above written.
ARAPAHOE ESTATES WATER DISTRICT
ATTEST:
Secretary
(S E A L}
-5-
SOUTH ARAPAHOE SANITATION DISTRICT
By-=-~-=-~-=---:,--~~--~--.--=---,.~~~ Charles R. Bruce, President
ATTEST:
Doyle Woodcock, Secretary
(S E A L)
D:\DLF\AEWD.AGR March 10, 1994 -6-
SENT BY :&EVERALL • P. C. 4-5-94 ;tt :OOAM BANTA .HOYT .GREENE~ 7622300;# 21 3
ATT. 3
SOPPLB)lDt'l' HO. '3{..p '!rO CODBC'IOR 1 8 AGRBBKDIT
'l'JIXS ~GaBEKBHT, made and entered into by and between the CITW
OW BlfGLEWOOD, actinq by and throuqh its duly authorized Mayor a n~
City Clerk, hereinafter called the "City," and SOUTH AR.APAHO:!!l
8ANJ:TATI05 DISTRICT, Arapahoe County, Colorado, hereinafter call ~~
the "Diatriot,"
WITUSSBTlll
1111ERBA8, the city and the District have entered into an Agree-
ment dated October 17, 1988, in which the City has aqreed to treat
sewaqe oriqinatinq from the District•s sanitary sewer system within
the area served by the District; and
WBEllBAS, the individuals and/or business entities named here-
inbelow have petitioned the District to have certain properties
excluded from the District boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to acknowledge changes in the bound-
aries of the service area and obtain the written consent of the
City for such changes;
HOW, TKERBPORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and
undertakinqs herein set forth, the parties agree as follows:
1. The City hereby consents to the exclusion of a certain
area located in Arapahoe County, Colorado, owned by Holly-Dry creek
venture an4 Alliant Techayateaa, Inc., and more fully described on
Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference,
from South ~apahoe Sanitati~n District. Accordingly, Exhibit A
ref erred to in Paragraph l of the Connector's Aqreement dated
October 17, 198~, is hereby amended to exclude such area.
2. Each and every other provision of the said Connector's
Agreement dated October 17, 1988, shall remain unchanged.
IN WIT!IB88 WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands and
seals this day of , 1994.
ATTESTl
CITY CLERK
(S E A L)
.A'l'l'ESTi
SBCUTAllY
(S E A L)
CITY OP DGLBWOOD
SOU'l'JIGATB ARAPAHO£ SAHITATIOH DISTRICT,
ARAPAHOB COUNTY,COLORADO
SENT BY=&EVERALL ,P.C . ; 4-5-94 ;ll=OlAM ; BANTA .HOYT.GREENE~ 7622300;# 3/ 3
Exhibit A
Legal Description:
A parcel of land located in the Northeast One-Quarter of Section 31, Township 5
South, Range 67 West of . the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Arapahoe. State
of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of said Section 31 ; thence N 90 00'00" W
along the north line of the NE 1 /4 of said Section 31, a distance of 40.00 feet;
thence S 00 20'16" W, a distance of 40.00 feet to the True Point of
Beginning, which point is the point of Intersection of the south right-of-way line
of East Dry Creek Road and the west right-of-way line or South Holly Street:
thence continuing S 00 20' 16" W along said west right-of-way line. a distance
of 1281.84 feet to a point on the south line of N 112 of said NE 1/4; thence N 89
56' 48" W along said south line, a distance of 10.00 feet to the northeast corner
of Block 2, Heritage Greens Subdivision Flllng No. 3; thence continuing
N 89 56' 48" W along the north line of said Block 2 and along said south line, a
distance of 1061 .68 feet ; thence departing said north line N 00 11·45• e. a
distance of 1280 .83 feet to a point on the south right-of-way line of East Dry
Creek Road, which point rs 40 .00 feet south or the north llne of ·the NE 1/4 of
said Section 31: thence N 90 00'00" E along said south right-of-way line and
parallel with the north line of said NE 114, a distance or 1074.85 feet, more or
less to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 31.56 Acres, more or less .
..
SUPPLEMENT NO. 12 2 TO CONNECTOR' S AGREEM NT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and be ween the CITY
OF ENGLEWOOD, acting by and through its duly author' zed Mayor and
City Clerk, hereinafter called the "City, 11 and SOUTH TE SANITATION
DISTRICT, Arapahoe and Douglas Counties, Colorad , hereinafter
called the "District,"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, on the 20th day of June, 1961, the City and the
District entered into an Agreement in which the ity agreed to
treat sewage originating from the District's sanita y sewer system
within the area served by the District, which Agre ment was most
recently renewed by Connector's Agreement dated Nov ber 16, 1988;
and
WHEREAS, said Connector's Agreement provides th t the District
may not enlarge its service area without the written consent of the
City;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and
undertakings herein set forth, the parties agree as follows:
1. The City hereby consents to the incl us· on of certain
additional area located in Arapahoe County, Colo ado, owned by
Holly-Dry Creek Venture and Alliant Techsystems, nc., and more
fully described on Exhibit A attached hereto an incorporated
herein by reference, into Southgate Sanitation Dist ict. The city
agrees that said additional area may be served ith the sewer
facilities of the District, and that the City wi l l t eat the sewage
discharged into the City's trunk line from said ad itional area,
all in accordance with the Connector's Agreement dat d November 16,
1988. Accordingly, Exhibit A referred to in Para raph 1 of the
Connector's Agreement dated November 16, 1988, is he eby amended to
include such additional area.
2. Each and every other provision of the sa'd Connector's
Agreement dated November 16, 1988, shall remain unc anged.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands and
seals this day of , 1993.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
SECRETARY
(SEAL)
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
SOUTHGATE SANITATION !STRICT,
Afil\PAHO:ci h?H~ :.JOUGLAS .... !'l.Ull'!'IES..,
COLORADO
.~ -
I
Legal Description:
A parcel of land located in tlie Northeast One-Quarter of Section 1, Township 5
South , Ran9e 67 'Nest of the 6th Principal Meridian. County of rapahce, State
of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the ncrtheast corner of said Section 31; thence 90 00'00" W
along the nor.h line cf the NE 1 /4 of said Section 31, a distanc of 40.00 feet;
thence S 00 20'16" W, a distance of 40 .00 feet to the T ue Point of
Beginning, which point is the point of intersection of the south ight-of-way line
of East Dry Creek Road and the west right-of-way line of Sou h Holly Street;
thence continuing S 00 20' 16" W along said west right-cf-way ine, a distance
of 1281.84 feet to a point en the south line of N 1 /2 of sa id NE 1 4; thance N 89
56' 48" W alcng said south line, a distance of 10.00 feet to the ortheast corner
of Block 2. Herita~e Greens Subdivision Filing No. 3; th nee continuing
N 89 56' 48" W arena the north line of said Block 2 and alone s id south line, a --distance of 1061 . 62 feet; thence departing said north line N O 11 '46" E, a
distance of 12BO. 83 feet to a point on the south right-of-way Ii e of East Dry
Creek Road, which point is 40.00 feet south of the north line o the NE 1 /4 of
said Section 31; thar.ce N 90 00'00" E along said south right-f-way line and
parallel with ti~e north line of said NE 1 /4, a distance of 107 4 . 8 fee t, more or
less to the True Feint of Beginning. Containing 31.56 Acres more or less.
...
\
..... ...__,.
)
__ ..-.. :..
'·
14:::54
··:-;--:-"-•4 :-: '·
~· ..
j •
···~ : I ., • I • ~ ' f . ~ -.... . :1 ... ··I ·. . . . . . . .
·. ' l .. I~ . . ...
( • 1 ~ ·::~ .
• . 4
~ •· 1~ .....,,,
DEC-17-~3 FRI 14:~6
···~-------------·---.. -------------
... ', ~·"'~ 11!'1'1 R,..t
, ,. i-___ ,;,._..,;·.;.;;"-;;;;....--• ·"····
I I !
! ;
: I: I . .
: ~ I ,
!/.
:W • If · I
I l !
lt
I
.
t
~
P.03
..
v ;
I
l
' t , • ,
I
I .
• ' i
l
I
I
I
~ 13 16
, ___ _
_,,.__-.,.,. ••v.._..u V tL-L-MVL-
'· ..... '
_ _ oRc HA_~o ROA o_ _ _ J L __________ _ ----------------11 -. ----------· -------------.,----------.;::: __
I, 11
!i 1·1_ 'I I ii i
I ·Ii
I .
i ul ~) I ~I I Iii
--------__ ;ft -----------L -.. ----__ JL __ 17
-----_jl __ --~
---------~-----;(--ARAPAHOE . ROAD ----l :-----
i! : I
!i : i -
SOUTH ARAPA~OE SANITATION DISTR.,l~ I ''f1
,I !
'i I!
'I I I · 'I
!! I
'j I
:1 15 IL
i i
_ _ _ _____ _ _ ______ _jL _~R:_r' _ ~~E-~~ -~-O~f2 _____ j ____ _ -------; r -. ------. ------~; 1----
!1 :
11 .
! ~ : I
§;1 I
_J i· m ' : I ~11
en a:: w
>
z
:::>
0
(f)
ci : >' _J o
ml
81
<t ' a::
0
...J
0 u
0
(f)
...... ----------1,-------------i\ ____ -------.
SOUfHGATE SANITATION DISliRICT
.1 I
j •
I :
i·
I ·
' 1:
I
I• ,: ,,
Ii
ol
I '.
_Ji_ __ -----·--,------·---·----·-
I
·' "
;I ,,
i.
" I•
ii
___ -·: ---=--~·-=---=-~~...:.._-::~---. ----------~---
~ i '''-i: -~PARCEL
·I
:1
:1
'• I · :i 'I
l1
II
11
I
--. . ----~ r-
,:
ll
---------
~
(/)
w ..--
~ w
(/)
0
>-
0
(/)
• 11 11 'I ~
----• ------•• ---h.. ---• ------·-.. _ -·-·-••• ·------·-----------·-.
COUNTY LINE ROAD
Senator Hank Brown
United State Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510-0604
Re: Superfund Reauthorization
Dear Senator Brown:
A TT. '-f
April 14, 1994
We are writing to you about one of our most urgent Federal
legislative priorities: passage of meaningful Superfund
reauthorization this year. Specifically, because of the
impact this legislation could have on local governments in
Colorado, we ask you to take a leadership role in ensuring
that relief already provided in the Clinton Administration
Bill is maintained throughout the legislative process.
Local governments care about Superfund for four reasons:
First, some 650 counties, cities, school districts and towns
have been sued under Superfund because they sent ordinary
household garbage or sewage sludge to sites where industrial
hazardous waste was co-disposed. Holding local governments
responsible under Superfund for garbage disposal means that
average citizens -not the parties that actually disposed of
toxic waste -are footing the bill for Superfund cleanups.
The Administration Superfund Bill would solve this problem
by capping the total combined liability of municipal solid
waste generators and transporters at 10% cleanup costs.
Second, some 135 local governments have owned or operated
sites on the Superfund National Priorities List and face
potentially overwhelming costs for cleaning up such sites.
Given the struggle local governments face simply to provide
basic public services, the law must be reformed to limit
their share of cleanup costs. The Administration Superfund
Bill would give local government owners and operators an
..
opportunity to demonstrate that they lack the "ability to
pay" a large share of cleanup costs and would limit their
contribution to amounts that will not jeopardize the
protection of public safety and health.
Third, hundreds of local governments face liability because
they sent very small amount of wastes such as used oil, high
school chemistry lab waste and common cleaners to Superfund
sites. They need an early opportunity to extricate
themselves from litigation that can take years and cost
millions of dollars in legal fees. The Administration
Superfund Bill would solve this problem by giving so-called
"de minimis" contributors the opportunity to cash out
liability very early, paying only their fair share.
Fourth, some 1200 local governments are "host communities"
for each of the site currently listed on the Superfund
National Priorities List. With the average cleanup taking
as long as twelve years, they have a vital interest in
expediting cleanup and ensuring that it is done well. If
Superfund is not reauthorized by October, 1995, it will run
out of money, jeopardizing cleanups in each of these host
communities.
We are asking you to take a leadership role in working with
the key Senate and House committees that have jurisdiction
over Superfund. Please take immediate action to help insure
that Superfund is reauthorized this year and that meaningful
relief for local governments remains in the final
legislation.
Sincerely,
Stewart H. Fonda
Director of Utilities
City of Englewood
#-TLiftBIDITY & DISINFECTION REPORT
· Return completed form to:
PWSID#
NAME OF SYSTEM: Eng lcwood, City of
-· ---Colorado Department of Health
Water Quality Control Division
DRINKING WATER SECTION
COUNTY: Arnpnhoe
MONTH/YEAR: MAR -1994
4300 Cherry Creek Drive South B-2
Denver, CO 80222-1530
Pl.ANT NAME
OR NUMBER: A LLE~ F \ L\E R
(303) 692-3500
CERTIFIED () ·· . -LL
OPERATOR SIGNATURE: JC 1 a.:ye( DJMtf
TURBIDITY SECTION
Point of Measurement ·D \ '>'11Z\ BUT\( N E. ITTR"( Type of Altratlon G.C N'
Required number of readings per day fa Check One: [
Turbidity MCL t. 0 NTU (1.0 or 0.5)
A Total number turbidity readings this month \BC.,
B Number of measurements > MCL ------
c % measurements> MCL (Note: C = B/A x 100) %
D If C ls greater than 5%, notify Colorado Department of Health and attac~
E Did any readings exceed 5 NTU? [ J Yes [ J No If yes, was Cl
( ) Check here If plant was off the ENTIRE month .
You must turn In a turbidity report for every WTP even If the report Is to
I .p "'-l<.. J; d "'-0<7 · k<!...U ~
a_ U A-J2. • C'\.. '°" ~ -C .(} D /I(.
CJ.... I, o NTu._
We Wc<.A.fJ {l:'\.U .,.. ~ Q J
~ ~ c ~? I~ ') e:.f . ~
01?....Jrz.~Te1<.. ~c/1 /1k~c/..
Tfi,·-s :.. /,~ ~ 61 Sa.,nff cf"
/a k.,... ~ W11w// b 4! '1-//:wt~
< .04'/o ~SA..,p/l"') "3 k..e"' ? : f I
.. : .. ·' <:···: .. . ·,•.• ·•· :::::::}.:': .. .:::;)/::;.;::~· :. . .':: . ;-:.···;.-. . . TURBIDITY MEASUREMENTS =: .·.·.-:.·
. • • • 0
..
Tlme : Time : Time : Tlme: Time: Time: . ·.·.·
Midnight -Hoon -• • -=· ";io./ ·a· .. , Mtilnt1h\.
(heel If Ht9h .. t
Oay . 4: •.•• • • e •·•· e -"°°" > : ..... :;· , ... . >tel . AHdin9
for Dav
I )1 '2'i ~0 '3~ 7G ~-, .n
2 .:l.,i ~? . )C' • ~L .3 \ . 32. .3Z
, .· :S2 3<f .31 . 3\ .3' .33 .·3c.t
• .31 .2cl .2'4 .2\ .ZZ 25 . 3. \
.. .2lv 2Ll . 2.~ . 2J_ .2.4 .72 .Zf.:.
' . z~ .22 .20 . \9 2.0 .lZ . 2 ~~
' .zz .23 .2~ . 2(o . z le . '2y , 2.<o
e .2.S . c~i .2S 2'-l .24 .23 . 2cl
• .• 23 2. 2-.2.2 '22.. , 2 \ . 2. \ .23
JO l<i .11 . l°t .21 .20 ..21 .21
11 2C• . 2.C• . 21 "'? ~ .z~ zz .Z3
12 / c-, 2 20 22-2 ?.-,25 ,1h .l ~
1l .2>. .27 'Vi _'.\') ,j~ .3~ 3 ·~
" ~LI .~l. ,3'il .~i:o .40 ,39 .Hl
, .. • '3L-. ,ii.\ .3b . "" ( . 41 .~cl &.I I
J6 ~~ . 3'\ -3~ .~ '-I C) .LI\ ,y \
17 • t~ 0 ,:ic. Al .s-o ~~ -~~ .so
18
l((_f so '-{ -s . ~':":) 's \ . '-fll .s1
10 3i .3Z 3(c _t-l I , 4 z. .3c7 .~ 2.
20 .3 '-· ;) ,
.) ':;) .~c:.j . 3l-.35' . z_cr . s (,
" -30 ?~ (... .SC• . l l -<..(Z .L/ 0 -LI 2.
22 3y; ~S' -:oy .~. .45 .41 .32.. . l{ -~
,, z -..,
' '-• I z_ 31 .Z\ -SC) . "2 '6 .. :2., l
2' 21 . Z..) .Zr z (._ ~ .Z) .27 .Z7
't; ,ZS . 2.1 .32 .3G, , 17 , 2'1 , 3<o
26 .2~ • 11 ,/I.:, .3(o .2~ . 22. , 3C:,
,, ,2 1 . I~ • It./ ,2L/ .30 .2~ .. 30
28 . I! .2 1 .2(, ,23 .27 .2'1 .zq
:n I 2'1 .27 .3(,, .4" ,4'6 ,43 ,<-lb
30 .3S ,29 .3~ . '-II .3</ .zq . '-(I
" • atJ .A I ... a·1 . '31 . 3 (... ?, 7 .. 31
HIGHEST READING OF THE MONTH: . 5'
Instruction•:
1. If you UM a contlnuoue monltorlhg turbldlmeter, record the value at the aame times each day.
2. If you perform grab sampling , collect your grab aamplte at tht same time each day.
3. Record the time you take your reading• at the top of the appropriate column.
·4. Record the highest turbidity reading recorded over the day. If you uee a contlnuout monitoring turbldlmettr, the reading cquld ooc:ur at
any time during the day, not just your designated four hour reading.
5 Enter .PO tor p&.trt off If the treatment plant did not operate within the dealgnaled 4 hour block.
revlud 7/21/tJ
DAYTIME PHONE:
...,,., .... i·o 1c·..,o'lli:: j""~\.) .,.) .. ~.
CERTIAED
OPERATOR SIGNATURE: rXfh uai Ck J 141 .f NAME OF SYSTEM: .........
Plant Name or Number: !\ \ Lf N E\ LTf g
CIT'/ Of ftHJl EWOOD
COUNTY: .... /\ ... E_b._e&i_.. ..... u .... o_E__,...,-.---
A
B
c
D
MAR -1991t MONTH/YEAR: _______ _
I. CHLORINATION -DISTRIBUTION
°BK-'Ts
Number of measurements {Bacterlologlcal samples} per month _ _.3-..-0..___.,....,rff f
fQlr ,. . \ )
Number Measurements • None Detected (ND) 0 (J\c ch\unrc \1 s1 cluo.
% Measurements None Detected (Note: C = B/A X 100) %
Measurements as total or free chlorine? __ .:!•1:1111&~~fl"B~~E;.it:.,;,_ _____ _
Note: An undetectable residual disinfectant concentration within the distribution system In more than 5%
of the Samples per month for any two consecutive months Is considered a treatment technique
violation.· Whenever you collect a routine bacterlologlcal water sample, you must determine the
chlorine level and record the value on the bacterlologlcal lab form .
II. CHLORINATION -TREATMENT
I.Cb '2..
2 t, 1 l\ 12.
3 1. r1 l2..
.'7'i 12..
I . 2tp \2-
IS \,\3 \Z
7 \, 2.0 \2
a I. \ l:, \ "L
8 '. 05' 12
10 \.0~ 12..
11 LOO 12..
12 ( ~ • I 12..
13 • i'} l 7~
14 ,54 17
15 1. 0 L I z..,
16 '. 27 l 2..-
17 l .15 12
18 \ bB l'L
18 • '1'd 12-
20 '.oh 12-
21 1.1 ·z. f'2. ..
22 l.00 12.
23 '. z.z. 12.
24 \,IS-12
25 '.oi.\ IL.
26 .C, I 12-
27 ,.z.c; 17
28 ; . lb ,,
29 l ·Z.~ '1-
30 I ."ZO 12..
31 I. 2. 'i I '2-
k\1truction1:
1. Enter the level ot the loweat residual disinfectant enterlna the distribution mtem Into Ult first column.
2. Enter "Continuoua• Into th• "Number of Mtasurementa per day" column H you are using contlnuoua monitoring equipment.
......
~·
03/31 /94 13:45
To:
'5'3037595355 CDH HAZ MAT
MEMORANDUM
Colorado Department of Health
Radiation Control Division
Pete Laux, Solid Waste Unit, HMWMD
From: K (we{;er, Uranium and Special Projects Unit, RCD ~""""u~~
Date:
Subject:
March 31, 1994 ·
Review of the Proposed Use of Allen Water Plant Sludge as
Landscaping Berm Material at the Englewood Golf Course Expansion
I have reviewed ( 1) the data provided February 16, 1994 for radium, thorium and
uranium radioactivity in City of Englewood Allen Water Trea t ment Plant alum
sludge and (2) the construction information and figures provided March 1, 1 994.
The use of Allen Water Treatment Plant alum sludges as golf course landscaping
berm material is acceptable, as described in the preliminary location plan and mixed
one-to-one with clean fill as proposed. ·
Thank you for the opportunity to evaluate the radiological aspects of this proposal.
If Radiation Control Division staff can be of any further assistance regarding other
part of the City of Englewood's plans, please contact Don Simpson or me.
xc: R. Quillin, RCD
D. Simpson, RCD
fa! 002
.)