Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-10-14 WSB AGENDAAGENDA ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD OCTOBER 14, 1997 5:00 P.M. CONFERENCE ROOM A 1. MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 WATER AND SEWER BOARD MEETING. (ATT. 1) 2. 3605 S. BANNOCK ST. (ATT. 2) 3. VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT DISSOLUTION. (ATT. 3) 4 . BID OPENING FOR ALLEN FILTER PLANT PROJECT. 5 . WILD & SCENIC TASK FORCE MEMO DATED 9-11-97 (ATT. 4) 6. OTHER WATER AND SEWER BOARD MINUTES SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 AT T.. I The meeting was called to order at 5:05 p.m. Chairwoman Neumann declared a quorum present. Members present: Members absent; Also present: Clark, Burns, Neumann, Guy, Vobejda Habenicht, Higday, Otis, Wiggins Stewart Fonda, Director of Utilities 1) MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 20, 1997 MEETING. The Englewood Water and Sewer Board Minutes from the August 20, 1997 meeting were approved as written. Mr. Vobejda moved; Mr. Guy seconded: Ayes: Nays: Members absent: Motion carried. To approve the August 20, 1997 Englewood Water and Sewer Board Minutes as written. Clark, Burns, Neumann, Guy, Vobjeda None Habenicht, Higday, Otis, Wiggins 2) GUESTS -MIKE GESIN -3605 S. BANNOCK ST. ENCROACHMENT ON CITY DITCH RIGH-OF-WAY. Mike Gesin and his contractor, Randy Ackerson of Room with a View, appeared before the Board to request to purchase adjoining Englewood Water Department right-of-way property. It was noted that the existing patio area and overhead sunroom already encroaches 4" onto City property. Mr. Gesin is requesting to purchase City Ditch right-of-way property for expanding the patio area with a prefabricated sunroom and a second story deck and stairs. Mr. Fonda noted that Utilities Dept. staff recommended denying the request. Mr. Gesin noted that a signed permit was issued by the Englewood Building Department and that other structures exist in the City Ditch right-of-way. The Board requested further research from staff and discussing the request at a future meeting. Mayor Burns moved; Mr. Guy seconded: Ayes: Nays: Members absent: Motion carried. To table Mr. Gesin's request to purchase a portion of City Ditch right-of-way at 3605 S. Bannock. Clark, Burns, Neumann, Guy, Vobjeda None Habenicht, Higday, Otis, Wiggins 3. GUESTS: VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT. Valley Board members John Boggs (chairman) , Jim Tomlin, Carol Clouse, Bill Miller, Al Dreiling and District Manager Florence Meehl appeared before the Board. Valley District Attorney Jim Collins and Valley's consulting engineer Rich Cassens also appeared. Mr. Cassens and Mr. Collins reviewed Valley's request for dissolution and for the City of Englewood to incorporate the Valley Sanitation District into the Englewood sanitation area. Mr. Fonda reiterated the Board's policy of only dealing with other government entities, not individuals. Mr. Boggs , requested a positive indicator from the Englewood Water Boad to proceed with negotiations. The Board requested further information regarding court- appointed powers and main line conditions before an interest in negotiating could be given. Ms. Neumann moved; Mr. Clark seconded: Ayes: Nays: Members absent: Motion carried. 4. THORNTON SETTLEMENT. To request further information before consideration of Valley Sanitation District's request for incorporation into the Englewood sanitation area. Clark, Burns, Neumann, Guy, Vobjeda None Habenicht, Higday, Otis, Wiggins The Board received a letter from Jack Graves of Chrisman Bynum & Johnson, Englewood's water attorney, proposing a settlement of the attorney's fees related to Englewood's voluntary dismissal in case #90CW221. The agreement states that Thornton will be issued a check from Englewood for $13,242.77 to be followed by either cash or shares in the Fulton Irrigating Ditch Company equaling the amount of $11,757.23. The subsequent $11,757.23 will be due upon Englewood receiving payment for its attorneys fees from Kiowa in Case #93CS151, or when it becomes clear that Englewood is unable to collect such costs, whichever occurs earlier. Mr. Guy moved; Mr. Clark seconded: Ayes: Nays: To recommend Council approval of the settlement to the City of Thornton for attorney's fees relating to the voluntary dismissal in Case #90CW221. Clark, Burns, Neumann, Guy, Vobjeda None Members absent: Motion carried. 5. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: Habenicht, Higday, Otis, Wiggins The Board received the following informational items: A. Letter from the Colorado Water Resources & Power Development Authority dated August 29, 1997 regarding approval of the Drinking Water Revenue Bonds 1997 Series A in the amount of $15,100,000. B. Letter from James Sullivan, Douglas County Commissioner, dated September 5, 1997 thanking Englewood for its commitment to preserving the South Platte River and opposing the "Wild and Scenic River" designation. C. Denver Post article dated August 15, 1997, "Golden prevails in water war." The next Water and Sewer Board meeting will be October 14, 1997 at 5:00 p.m. in Conference Room A. Respectfully submitted, Cathy Burrage Recording Secretary PUBLIC MEETING SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 5:00 P.M. ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD NOTICE OF IMPROVEMENTS TO ENGLEWOOD WATER TREATMENT PLANT A public meeting was held, as advertised, to discuss the proposed Improvements to the Englewood Allen Filter Plant. The Board received a copy of the legal notice published August 28, 1997 in the Englewood Herald. The following Englewood employees and representatives were present: Stu Fonda, Director of Utilities There were no Englewood citizens or interested parties present for the meeting. The public meeting was declared closed at 5:10 p.m. ATT. 2 City of Englewood 3400 S. Elati Street Englewood, Colorado 80110-2304 Phone (303) 762-2300 \303) 762-2301 FAX (303) 789-1125 Mike Crigler Construction 3250 Oakland St. #G Aurora, Colorado 800 l 0 Sept.30, 1997 Ref: 3605 So . Bannock St. Dear Mr. Crigler, On August 27 , 1997 the building department issued a pennit at the above referenced address based on documents that were submitted by your company. Included was a site plan that showed setbacks from the existing structure that were later identified as inaccurate. (see attached) Also, see the 'compliance notice' on the approved plans that state "The approval of these plans shall not be construed to authorize any work to be performed in violation of municipal code requirements or state law ." We regret to inform you, but effective this date , permit # B-14492 is being revoked per the Uniform Building Code, specifically section I 06.4.5 which states "The building official may, in writing, suspend or revoke a permit issued under the provisions of this code whenever the permit is issued in error or on the basis of incorrect information supplied, or in violation of any ordinance or regulation or any of the provisions of this code." Continuing on , Section 107 .6 also states "The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with this code. The building official shall not authorize refunding of any fee paid except on written application filed by the original permittee not later than 180 days after the date offee payment. If you have any questions regarding this action please call me at 762-2355. Cc: Michael J. Gesin, Property Owner Lance Smith, Chief Building Official Stu Fonda, Director/Utilities John Bock, Manager of Administration Harold Stitt, Community Coordinator/Planning Chris Olson, Director of Safety Services address file contractors' file Sincere!, // f a{_,cJ/~ f.6Y· . Ch rles D. Petty, Jr. Residential Plans Examiner MEMORANDUM DATE: Sept. 26, 1997 TO: Chris Olson, Safety Services Director FROM: Lance Smith, Chief Building Official SUBJECT: Permit Revocation at 3605 S. Bannock St. Chris, After reviewing the Building Permit application and the Site Plan that was submitted by the general contractor for the above address, I have determined that the following actions should be taken: I. Building Permit# B-14492 will be revoked as required per Section 106.4.5 of the Uniform Building Code which states " The building official may, in writing, suspend or revoke a permit issued under the provisions of this code whenever the permit is issued in error or on the basis of incorrect information supplied, or in violation of any ordinance or regulation or any of the provisions of this code . " The Site Plan indicates that a Side Set Back of 10 feet exists on the north side of the structure . The Survey that was performed by Utility Department shows that the existing structure is already encroaching on city property by 3 inches. The 10 foot set back indicated on the contractors Site Plan is actually city property . 2. Refund 80% of the Permit Fee and 100% of the use ta'< that was collected when the permit was issued . The Plan Review Fee that was paid by the contractor will not be refunded as this service has been performed. Section 107 .6 of the Uniform Building Code allows the building official to only authorize a refund of not more than 80% of the Permit Fee if the contractor requests such refund on a written application within 180 days of fee payment. Attached are copies of the Building Permit, Site Plan, Survey and a draft of the letter that will be sent to the contractor after your review. Lance ,_ ~J (o . 90110 If f I /"fd't !) voo /,.) /C. I t l . i ' t l ' i I J '$ ) .2 J { ,;2 ------=----/<-IO ·~ . ('\ "\ 1-S 9 :~NC""" /6r1'g/tDcJ.,... C:--';,~.;....) /{ri·o I r: / '4 ? p<,,_> 9 1 Sflec !>'>w ... JI AT T. 3 Interoffice Memo Date: 10-7-97 To: STU FONDA, UTILITIES DIRECTOR CC: .tf1v1'1l' From: BILL MCCORMICK , OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDENT/ UTILITIES RE: POTENTIAL PROBLEMS WITH A SANITARY MAIN IN A LANDFILL THERE ARE A VARIETY OF PROBLEMS WITH TAKING OVER A SANITARY SYSTEM THAT IS BENEATH A LANDFILL. SOME OF THESE PROBLEMS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. EXCAVATION FOR POINT REPAIRS OR REPLACEMENT IS EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS DUE TO METHANE GAS BUILDUP IN THE TRENCH. WE ARE NOT EQUIPED TO PERFORM THIS TYPE OF MAINTENANCE AND IT WOULD BE EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE TO DOSO. 2. WHEN A PIPE IS DEEPER THAN 4 FEET , SHORING MUST BE PERFORMED. IN A LANDFILL THIS IS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT AND HAZARDOUS DUE TO THE DEBRIS AND POLLUTANTS IN THE SOIL. PIPE THAT IS 14 FEET OR DEEPER MUST BE CONTRACTED OUT FOR REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT, BECAUSE OF THE DIGGING LIMITS OF OUR EQUIPMENT. Interoffice Memo 3. A LANDFILL IS KNOWN TO HAVE EXTREMELY HOT SOIL THAT WILL DESTROY PIPES . I BELIEVE THAT A CONTINUOUS REPAIR PROBLEM WOULD OCCUR IN THIS ENVIRON- MENT AND POSSIBLY THE ENTIRE PIPE COULD BE DESTOYED . 4. A METHOD OF REPAIRS WITHOUT EXCAVATIOIN IS CALLED IN-SITU-FORM .THIS IS LIN- ING OF THE PIPE WITH A PLASTIC TUBING WITHOUT EXCAVATION . HOWEVER THIS METHOD IS EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE , WITH COSTS EXCEEDING $100 TO $200 PER FOOT. I RECOMMEND THAT WE DO NOT TAKE OVER A SANITARY SYSTEM THAT IS IN A LANDFILL. I BELIEVE IT WOULD CAUSE UNDO HARDSHIP FOR OUR EMPLOYEES, EQUIPMENT, AND BE EXTEMELY EXPENSIVE TO MAINTAIN. A TT. '-+ SUBURBAN WATER SUPPLIERS WILD AND SCENIC TASK FORCE 390 Union Boulevard, Suite 415 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 (303) 980-8668 Telefax: (303) 980-9551 Adams County Arapahoe County Douglas County Jefferson County Alameda Water & Sanitation District City of Arvada City of Aurora Bear Creek Water & Sanitation District Centennial Water & Sanitation District Cherry Creek Valley Water & Sanitation District Consolidated Mutual Water Company Douglas County Water Resource Authority Arapahoe County Water and Wastewater Authority Castle Pines Metro District Castle Pines North Metro District Centennial Water & Sanitation District TO: FROM: DATE: MEMORANDUM Suburban Water Suppliers Wild and Scenic Task Force Marcia M. Hughes September 11, 1997 Cottonwood Water & Sanitation District RE. East Cherry Creek Valley Water & Sanitation District · Summary of Wild and Scenic Task Force Meeting -September 9, 1997 Highlands Ranch Metro District #2 Inverness Water & Sanitation District Meridian Metro District North Douglas County Water & Sanitation District Parker Water & Sanitation District Pinery Water & Wastewater Roxborough Park Metro District Stonegate Village Metropolitan District Town of Castle Rock Willows Water District East Cherry Creek Valley Water & Sanitation District City of Englewood City of Glendale Inverness Water & Sanitation District Ken Caryl Ranch Water & Sanitation District Lakehurst Water & Sanitation District City of Lakewood City of Littleton Parker 'Nater & Sanitation District Platte Canyon Water & Sanitation District South East Englewood Water District Southwest Group Southwest Metro Water & Sanitation District City of Thornton The Wild and Scenic Task Force met on September 9, 1997, to review the-current status on preparing our Alternative A2 proposal. The group continued in its work which is focused on its intention of convincing the Forest Service to select Alternative A2 as its final action and to not recommend any wild and scenic river designation. Attendees at the meeting were: Tom Griswold, Marcia Hughes, Charlie Jordan, Marc Waage, Frank Kunze, Brooke Fox, John Meurer, Mike Boster, Rick Mcloud and Lisa Purdy. NEXT MEETING: OVERVIEW Thursday, October 23, 1997, 2:00 p.m. Denver Water Department 3n:t Floor, Board Room The Task Force heard reports from Marcia Hughes, Charlie Jordan, Mark Waage and Lisa Purdy regarding different aspects of building the A2 plan. MEMORANDUM Page2 September 11, 1997 The plan is definitely beginning to come together. For example, Marcia expressed her intention to distribute the first rough draft of the Trust Fund component within the next week. We expect to have drafts of eve ion by early October. Therefore, we have scheduled an opportunity on ct ber 9 r those interested in how the plan is coming together to review those four mponen . This will build on an earlier informational meeting that was held primarily for environmentalists and other similar interest groups. The October 9ttt meeting will likely be held in the Threestone Building and will be held from 5 :00 to 7:00 p.m . with a buffet being served from 5:00 to 5 :30 and the discussion beginning at 5 :30. You are encouraged to attend. SOURCE WATER PROTECTION PLAN Charlie reported that the committee is coming together in its work. He is meeting with Julie Vlier. Aurora and Denver are expecting to hire Brown and Caldwell to assist in this first tier scoping process. Their effort is focused on drinking water quality and new · requirements that have emerged under the Safe Drinking Water Act. There is some - hope that, given the early leadership provided as a part of this effort, that some federal funds will be available to support further development of this effort. RECREATION Marcia reported that the recreation committee is well attended and is beginning to focus on developing the A2. recommendation. It will likely call for developing long-term, well-thought-out recreation plan. The committee has stated that it is not interested in just a few "quick fix" exciting items such as new trails. Charlie and Marcia discussed possibilities of including State Parks as a part of the planning process . FLOW Mark Waage reported on the flow committee meetings. They are primarily looking at increasing flows throughout the Alternative J corridor. That would be from Elevenmile Reservoir to the confluence. They are also looking at potential temperature controls below Elevenmile. At this time DOW has said that high flows are not a key concern to them. However, there has been some comment by a Trout Unlimited representative that they may ask for high flows to be further addressed. The likely end product is to have target minimum flows with some outs when the minimum flows cannot be met so that our water supply is not diminished. The plan is also likely to include a procedure for bottom releases from Elevenmile. Committee members noted that the primary response is that we simply do not have enough storage to be in the flood control business, and thus to shave peaks. .- MEMORANDUM Page3 September 11, 1997 TRUST FUND Marcia reported that the trust fund committee is working well together. They are focusing on the size of the Board, the membership and its roles. There has also been quite a bit of dialogue before the trust fund committee regarding the administration of the funds. At this point we are likely to decide to set up our own foundation, but ask for another foundation to administer it. There was also some dialogue that perhaps some entity such as Douglas County or Denver could offer to provide some administrative assistance. Brooke reflected that this is under consideration in Douglas County. The Task Force agreed that the committee could review addressing the area not only through Alternative J, which is Elevenmile to the confluence but also the additional segment which is on the North Fork and is reflected by Alternative B. Th;s area is from the confluence to Estabrook. However, the Task Force did not finally decide on whether the North Fork should be included. If anyone would like further details on any of these committees, please call Marcia's office at (303) 980-8668. OTHER Tom Griswold initiated the discussion relating to how we would respond to requests from environmentalists through Alternative J, regarding some compromise, which might be on a designation which is smaller in scope or some compromise regarding the Right-of-Way. He stated his understanding that there is complete agreement that the Task Force and Denver will not agree to any designation of any size. We will have a dialogue regarding the Right-of-Way with five representatives from the water community meeting with representatives of the environmental or other interests user community. The dialogue will create an opportunity to better understand one another's concerns. It is not intended as a negotiating session, but rather one to expand understanding. MMH:sh cc: Charlie Jordan Dave Shryver Cole Emmons wild&sc\90997taskforcemins .doc TO : FROM: DATE: RE: MARCIA M. HUGHES, P.C. A ttorney and Counselor At Law MEMORANDUM Members of Trust Fund Committee and other interested parties Marcia M. Hughes September 11, 1997 FIRST ROUGH DRAFT OF TRUST FUND SECTiON I am enclosing the first rough draft of the Trust Fund Section for Alternative A2.. This is intended to be an initial talking document. It will be worked on for the next two committee meetings of September 22, 1997 and October 7, 1997, as well as in whatever further dialogue is established. As a reminder, we meet from 5-7 p .m. in Room 308, Denver Water Department. This includes an additional suggestion for a different way of organizing the Board than we discussed at the last meeting. The suggestion came from Brooke Fox in response to interests that have been raised since the meeting by entities such as Arapahoe County. This draft says specifically that Denver Water and the Water Suppliers would establish a trust fund or foundation independent of any other entity. We believe that is important for purposes of being able to effectively track and manage the money. We are very interested in this fund or foundation being administered by an ongoing entity such as those the committee is considering . This matter can be more fully addressed at the upcoming meeting on the 22nc1 . Please call should you have any comments or questions . In the meantime, please feel free to mark this draft up in any way and fax it to me in advance or to hand it out at the committee meeting. MMH:sh cc: Wild and Scenic Task Force wild&sc\trustfundmemo91197 390 Union Boulevard, Suite 4 15 Lakewoo d, Colorado 80228-1556 (303) 980-8668 FAX (303) 980 -9551 NOTE: This is the first rough draft. Any items in here may change. PURPOSE TRUST FUND (A2 Insert) The Metropolitan Water Suppliers, Wild and Scenic Task Force ("Water Suppliers·) and Denver Water have decided there is value to creating a trust fund of $1 million, the interest of which can be used as supplemental funding to support the values in the area on the South Platte identified below. A foundation will be established as well as a Board to determine allocation of funds and to cooperate together on other important matters. The Water Suppliers and Denver are a coalition of general purpose governments, water suppliers, and others who have decided to work together to accomplish their primary purpose of protecting the values on the mainstem while maintaining local decision making on the Platte. The trust fund can assist in the effort of protecting important values on the identified part of the South Platte. This fund will create supplemental funding, additional moneys, which would not otherwise be available to support these uses. Added benefits A2. contributes which would not occur if a designation is recommended instead, include the additional funds, the Multipurpose Board which will facilitate better understanding of different users needs, and create opportunity to cooperate more effectively. CORE CONTRIBUTION The Water Suppliers and Denver Water together will contribute $1 million to the trust fund which will be managed as set forth below. The $1 million will be contributed over a course of 3 years beginning 6 months after the Forest Service has taken a final agency action deciding to not designate the areas which it has identified as eligible along the South Platte and North Fork. The corpus of the trust, the $1 million, can not be spent. Interest from the fund can be spent on an annual basis on values on the river identified below. Those interested in the fund will also be encouraged to use strategies to maximize the resources available . This can be done through a variety of measures including: • Providing for memberships (this could include individual memberships of a relatively small amount of money); • Providing for strategies to receive grants from GOCO or other sources; • Requiring some matching funds or services; TRUST FUND Draft 1 09/13/97 Page2 • Many other strategies are likely to be developed by the Board and others interested in this fund. ELIGIBLE PROJECTS The purpose of creating this fund is to provide supplemental resources to support the values in the area where the Forest Service otherwise may have recommended a wild and scenic designation. The Outstandingly Remarkable Values ("ORvs·) identified by the Forest Service in different parts of the eligible sections are: • Historic Cultural Resources • Fisheries • Geologic • Recreational • Scenic • Wildlife • Vegetation/Ecological ELIGIBLE AREA Because of the importance of tying the investment to the fact that this is created as an alternative to a recommendation for a wild and scenic designation, the geographic reach on which the funds can be spent is limited to [insert one of the following alternatives) 1. 48.1 miles on the mainstem of the South Platte River running from Elevenmile Dam (downstream from the fence on Denver Water's special use area) to the high water line of Strontia Springs Reservoir (6029 foot contour). This is equivalent to Alternative J. or 2. All areas determined eligible by the Forest Service. This is equivalent to Alternative B. On the mainstem it includes 48.1 miles from Elevenmile Dam (downstream from the fence on Denver Water's special use area) to the high water line of Strontia Springs Reservoir. On the North Fork it would run from the confluence with the South Platte River to Estabrook. The two areas total 72.3 miles. RESTRICTIONS ON EXPENDITURES There will be a few restrictions on the use of the funds. These are: TRUST FUND Draft 1 09/13197 Page3 • The investments can only be made in accordance with the eligible uses and geographic area set forth above. • No funds can be used to challenge or oppose in any way water development or water operations. • No funds can be used to harm any of the ORVs in the identified geographical area. • Only a limited amount of funds, not more than _____ %, can be used for administrative costs. • Other? SOUTH PLATTE RIVER ENHANCEMENT BOARD A Board will be established which will make final decisions on award of funds from the interest received from the trust fund, so long as the expenditures are within the guidelines set forth above. [Possibly also include: In addition, the Board will take on an advisory function by providing advice on matters it deems to be important to its overall purpose of protecting the identified values on the identified segments on the South Platte and [North Fork (?)] which are subject to the trust fund. The Board will determine items which it deems of significant importance for it to address. In addition, the Board must determine that a particular issue is within its capability of addressing given the time and resource limitations it has.] The Water Suppliers and Denver would take the lead in assisting the Board and others to develop [possibly: intergovernmental agreements(?) ("IGA's")] to support a timely and effective commenting role. These IGA's would be developed after the Forest Service has taken final agency action determining to not recommend designation. The intention would be to finalize the IGA's within months after the Forest Service decision. The likely IGA's would be between the Board and any or all of the following entities: the Forest Service; Bureau of Land Management; Division of Wildlife; State Parks; Jefferson, Douglas and Park counties; Denver 'Nater; and the City of Aurora. [others?] The intended content of the IGA will be to spell out a commitment to provide a role for the Board to have information and sufficient notice in order to be able to timely and meaningfully comment to the decision making entities. This will be one of the important instruments to provide effective ongoing implementation of coordinated decision making and information sharing regarding the uses on the river. The intention is to assist one another to make conscious decisions regarding any uses on the river so that the overall goals of protecting the uses can be achieved. The other role of the Advisory Committee will be to determine the expenditures of the interest from the $1 million trust fund that is established as well as any other funds that TRUST FUND Draft 1 09/13/97 Page4 are available due to contributions, grants or other sources. The Board will adopt, from time to time, any rules it deems appropriate to govern the issuance of its grants. BOARD MEMBERSHIPS The membership of the Board would be [any of the following alternatives or some other permutation may ultimately be determined) • Limited to 15 members (?) • (1) Made up of a selection of the following: angiers, land owners (mainstem and North Fork), boaters, outfitters, hikers, trail bikers, motorized vehicles use, 4 wheel drive clubs, wildlife, representatives, someone concerned with eco-system protection, two at large members chosen by the Board, a representative from Jefferson County, a representative from Douglas County, possibly representatives from Denver Water and Aurora and other counties. or (2) Each of five different categories would have three representatives made up of groups listed above and others. The categories might be: non- motorized recreation; motorized recreation; whole ecosystem representative and at-large member(s); counties (Jefferson, Douglas and Park); water suppliers (including one from Arapahoe County and others from ???). or ????? ADMINISTRATION Denver Water and the Water Suppliers will create a trust fund .for purposes of contributing the money and to set forth the specific parameters surrounding expenditure of interest earned by this fund. The Board (?) will decide which entity to ask to manage the funds. Current entities which have been considered include the Greenway Foundation and the Denver Foundation. Because it will be some time before the fund is actually created, the identification of the foundation and specific negotiations can only be effectively carried out only when we are actually ready to establish the fund. TRUST FUND Draft 1 09/13/97 Page 5 OTHER [insert as identified] Wild&sc'trustfl.lnclg1197