Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-08-18 WSB AGENDA1. 2 . 3. 4. 5. 6 . 7. 8. 9. AGENDA ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD AUGUST 18, 1998 5:00 p.m. CONFERENCE ROOM A MINUTES OF THE MAY 12, 1998 WATER AND SEWER BOARD MEETING. (ATT. 1) NEW MEMBER: ROBERT CASSIDY GUEST: SHEA HOMES RE: McLELLAN RESERVOIR PROPERTY (ENCLOSED ENVELOPE) MOTION ITEMS: LICENSE AGREEMENTS: A. LICENSE AGREEMENT: WATER LINE AT BATES & EMERSON (ATT. 2) B. LICENSE AGREEMENT: BARN ENCROACHMENT FOR DANIEL BROST (ATT. 3) C. GRANT OF CITY DITCH EASEMENT WITH FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST AT 3701 S. LOGAN (ATT. 4) SOUTHGATE SUPPLEMENT #138. (ATT. 5) AMENDED RESPONSE TO THORNTON'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES AND LITIGATION WITH BI-CITY. (ATT. 6) LETTER DATED JULY 24, 1998 RE: RECREATION AT McLELLAN RESERVOIR. (ATT. 7) CUSTOMER COMPLAINT: 3021 W. BELLEWOOD DR. (ATT. 8) OTHER. WATER AND SEWER BOARD MINUTES MAY 12, 1998 A TT.. I The meeting was called to order at 5:05 p.m. Chairman Guy declared a quorum was present. Members present: Members absent; Also present: Habenicht, Higday, Otis, Guy, Bradshaw Clark, Burns, Vobejda Stewart Fonda, Director of Utilities John Bock, Mgr. of Administration 1. MINUTES OF THE APRIL 14, 1998 MEETING. The Englewood Water and Sewer Board Minutes from the April 14, 1998 meeting were approved as amended. Ms. Habenicht moved; Ms. Bradshaw seconded: Ayes: Nays: Members absent: Motion carried. To approve the April 14, 1998 Englewood Water and Sewer Board Minutes as amended. Habenicht, Higday, Otis, Guy, Bradshaw None Clark, Burns, Vobejda 2 . WATER MAIN FLUSHING. Mr . Fonda noted that the manganese removal facility appears to have helped alleviate some rusty water problems. He also noted that the most efficient time to flush is after demand increases for lawn watering. It is not practical to do flushing then because there is not enough time to give adequate public notice . 3. GUEST: JIM TOMLIN & JIM COLLINS WITH THE VALLEY WATER DISTRICT. Jim Collins, the attorney for the Valley Water and Sanitation District appeared to discuss the dissolution contract sent for approval to the Englewood Water Board . Stu noted that, with the exception of the cap on out-of- district service charges, the agreement appeared acceptable . The Board directed staff to negotiate a final agreement with no cap . Mr. Tomlin and Mr. Collins thanked the Board for their consideration. 4. MEMO FROM WILD & SCENIC TASK FORCE. The Board received a memo from the Wild and Scenic Task Force dated April 15, 1998 regarding the support the South Platte Protection Plan that will be submitted to the Forest Service for wild and scenic designation. Stu noted that Englewood would probably be asked to share costs at some future date in the approximate amount of $30 ,000. The request, when submitted, will be presented to the Board. 5. SMALL LAND PURCHASE . Mr . Bock discussed the letter received from Arapahoe County regarding the small land purchase on Bannock Street next to the City Ditch for a gate. Arapahoe County is willing to transfer ownership to Englewood with the condition that Englewood coordinates the plans with the neighboring property owner. John noted that the City Attorney is preparing the Quit Claim Deed and it wi l l then go to Council for approval. Mr. Higday moved; Mr. Guy: To recommend Council approval of a small land purchase for a City Ditch gate . Ayes: Nays: Members absent: Motion carried. Habenicht, Higday, Otis, Guy, Bradshaw None Clark, Burns, Vobejda The next Water and Sewer Board meeting will be July 14, 1998 at 5:00 p.m. in Conference Room A. Respectfully submitted, Cathy Burrage Recording Secretary COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Date Agenda Item July 20 , 1998 A IT. 2- Subject Grant of Water Lines Easement at Bates and Emerson INITIATED BY Utilities Department STAFF SOURCE Stewart Fonda , Director of Utilities COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION None RECOMMENDED ACTION The Englewood Water and Sewer Board , at their July 14 , 1998 meeting recommended Council approval of the Grant of Water Line Easement from Stephen and Lori Miller at 2882 S. Emerson St. BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED Mr . And Mrs . Miller have submitted a Grant of Water Line Easement for the purpose of installing a water main to allow water service to the property owned by Michael Thynne at Lot 1, Brickard Subdivision just north of E. Bates on S. Emerson St. (see attached map) The proposed easement would allow a sub-surface water line within a permanent easement granted to the City as Resolution No . 31 , Series 1985 for a public cul-de-sac. Mr. Thynne's water main contractors will be installing the 6" water main in Emerson Street up to the City Ditch easement and continue construction on the south side up to Lot 1. The water main portion that crosses the City Ditch will not be completed until a City Ditch License Agreement is obtained (to be submitted at a later date), and the City Ditch is off-line in the fall . FINANCIAL IMPACT The adjacent owners are paying all water main expenses . Mr . Thynne has submitted a check to the Utilities Department in the amount of $4 , 100 . (contractor's estimate) to complete the water main section crossing the City Ditch , in the event that the contractor defaults. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Ordinance Grant of Water Line Easement dated June 15 , 1998 Area map r -. . . ~~:: ~f i.·· ~::­ ~· ~ ;, # ,. f' ~'.: Iii· ~ fi· [ ~­p ~ CLOSED CLOSED <;j"° '::i r<) ---- CLOSED'j l 1~ ..; v ll ; \j Mt!tJR. •oL>5 ..... 10,."if' ,,, ..... air , '"" 1201 9 .,,. Iv,-.... ~ ~ 003: ~ ~ r: \-i6 10 C\{ lO 2+74 -t-"' 003 006 ? 4 '0i.JT Q) Cl 143 METcR C\l v ·o Q 13 3. 3!J2.~-----6 O'o"Jlic 60 .5 PROPOSED 300 5 EASEMENT 0 \() ( 14) 0 ., \!) - ~ (X) ~ I-C\j - (/) ---------- 5 z: LOT 0 BRICkARD I @ (/) ME~ ER 2_3'~ S..!Lo_ er: SUS. 2 w "' LOT o SOUTO /I CD o q: ~ (I) "' CD "' (J) 001 (\J w 00 N / _,. C.l .P. 300.5 ~ (/) 3d 002 ® 166. 1663/.('TJll" ...... 9 0 I ::> 4 'ou[ tn.--e+-~ 2+93 6) "' CLARK C\I SU 8 4 '01J r /CG HETEll. "' 059 ,0u-r t--"' "' ----------(])-.. /+49 C\J Q+94 0 I-~ 3' our rr) '..: 6 ~ CD ME T"°R 6) CD "' ' 01 0 IX) u1 0 -<.. 0 0 -= Q C\j Q 133 133 EAST ~ATES ,<) 4 <>"Q 22 1----'-......,'-"-~-' METER 144 4 METER REMOVED ( 45) '~ Zt-ol 023 \5 6 4'our ~ _Z~I-3~8"--_(_4_7_)-+---' d SU [3 2'owr_ 4'owr rn ' "'{-3/'I" T"IP . °{} r1.:r£P. 0 2 4 (5)°{} <..ri -..tD "' (J)"' N 5 144 95 (43) 0 005 "' I'- 3+53 J'owr 02 5 6) ~"' en '.': ~ (/) o t-: "'CO (\j ,,.,0 -:Q) ~(() 'It- mCO U">C() (\j "'~ I'-a: -(\; 4,;,'. ::: '-_Bj19'l..4E55L _ _ _ _ _ ·tt: cu· 1 I() P. v. c . N ' T'.dIS GRAN'r of a water l ine ~as~mem: (th.1.s "Grant.") is made this /. s=e::--day ct June , 1..51 9 8 by Ste o h e n M. Mil l er -and Lori L. Mi l ler ( "Gran'l:.or") whose aoo.ress ~s 2882 S. Em ers o n Stre e t, En g lewoo d , CO 80110 in favor cf t:he CITY O:F ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, ( ""Grant:e~") whose address ig 3100 South Ela~i St=eet, ~nglewocd. CO 80110; Ihe p&r~ies covenant and agree as follows~ 1. Ease~~t P=operty. The "EasemenL Proper~y" ahail mean Lhe real prope~y lcc2ted in the County of Ara~ahoe, State of Cclarado , more pa.=-.:icularl y described on Exhibi~ A 1 consi.scing of 4 pages, attached heret:o and incorporated he~e i r. by =efe=~~ce. 2. Con~ide=~tion . As eonside=ation for this Grant, Grant:l!e has paid Grant or the sum of One dollar· ( S :t.. ca ) and. 01:.her C"occ and va l uab l e C?D!?idera~icn, the receipt of which is hereby ackncw l edged by Grantor. 3. Granc of Wate~ Li~e Easern~nt. Gran~or he~eby qr1l.nts ~o Gran~e~, it~ suecessors and ~~signs, ~ perpet~al, ncnexclu.sive easement: (t·.he "Wat:er Line Easement:.") over , under, across and through. the Easement P~operi:y for the purpose of canst:.":!:'UC1=ing, operar.ing , mai"!l.t:.ainin.g,. xepai.::'ing, replacing, remcving and enJ.drging ~he ~Lines and Appurtenances ," as he~eina:f:~~r dt!fined . The "Lines and Appuz-.::enanc~s ·" ehall mean c:ie or more water pipelines and ~ll nec~saarf u:..derground. and su~f ace appur<:.enances ~h.ereco necessary or desi~able for the cransmi.ssion of wate=, including, but not lim.ic:ed 'to, ma.:.::.ns , conduits. ''ault:s, ventilators, elec:::.ric or other control syst:.eitl:3, cables., wi=es and CQnnections. 4 .. Access_ Grantee shal.1 have t:.he ' perpt<!~ual, ncnexclusi~re :right cf ingr~.!;S and egress in , to, over, through and across che Easem~n~ Prop~rty !or any purpose necessary or d~si~able for the fu:l enjoyment of ~h e rights . gran~ed to Grantee· under this Gran~. S. Resc:orat:icn. Grant:e~ aare-es e.h.at aft:e:::-~he c~n~tru.c~~on. rna~n~enanc~. repair: ~eulacamen~, a~ enlargement i~ any for the Lines an~ Appureenances, Gran~~e shall re2tore che surf ace of the Eas~ment Prope~y ae nearly as re~sonable possible to tbe grade and condi~ion it was immediat:~ly prJ.or to said con.st:::uct.ion, mainr:enanc:e. repair. r~~lacement, or enlargement, except ~~ may be nec~ssazy ~o accommodate the Lines and Appm;tena.D.ce3. Grance~ agrees · to ~store and ~pai~ any imp=ovements of Grantor on the Easement Property which· are damaged, modified or altered by Grantee ~uring said con~truction, maintenance, repai:, repl a<;:ement. or enlarg~rnent:. Gram:ee fur.the::-agrees· to replaca any topsoil removed from any c:u.l~ivaeed or agricultural are4s on th.e E~seme.nc Property and to remove any excesa earth resulting £rom said eonst=uc~ion, maintenance, :r-epai:::, :replac~ment:: Ol:' enlargement, a1:. Gr~n~ee's sole cos~ a.nd ~e..~$e. 6 . No Imprevem@nts. Gran~or cov@nants and agrees not to const:nict, ere=t, plac~ or plan any nrmprovemen~s,~ as he~einaft~~ de£ined, on the Easement Prope~cy without obtaining the prior wri tt.en c .onsent of Gran~~e. "Impro;rement.s 11 .shall mean any s~"'"\l~ture, building, planting, tre~s or shrubbery ot.h@r than a lawn. Grancee ~hall have th~ right to remove, without any liabili~y to grantor, any improV'ements coD.2tructed, erected, placed or planted on the Easeme~e P~operty without Grant@e 1 E having obtained Che prior writt~n consen~ of Grantor. 7. subjacent and Lateral Suppor~. Grant:or covenants and agrees that Grantee ahall h.ave the right o! subjacen~ and lateral supper~ on che Ea.semenc Propercy co wha~ever ext:ent. is necessary or desirabl ~ for the full r com~l~t~. and \llldi~e4rbed enjoymen~ of the rights granted to Grantee under this Gra.n.r:. 8 . Right:s of Gr~tor .. Grant.:o:r r~serves the full right to the undis~urbed ownership, u~e, and occupancy of the Easement Prop~rty inscfar as said owner~hip, ~se, and occu.cancy i~ conBisten~ with and doe5 not impair the rights 9ran~ed to Grantee in ~his Gr~n~- 9. Abandcnmen~. In ~he event ~hac Grante~ ~haii abandon the rights granted ~o i~ under. thi~ Grent, all. right, ~itle and interest hereunder of Grantee shall eease and t~rminace, ~nd Gra.ntor shall hold ~ase~nt Proper~yr as the same may then be, free from the rights of Grantee so abandoned and shall own all materials and struc:ure$ of Gr~nt~e so a.b~~doned, provided tha~ Grantee shall have ~ reasonable period of time af'ter aaid abandonment in which to r~move any or all Lines and Appurcen~ces from the. Easemenc P:ropP-rty. !.n the e .. rent: th~t E:asement is .abandoned by- Grancee, Granter shal~ have c~~ ri~ht, at ics sole option, ~o requ~re Grantee ~o remove or neu~=alize any improvements cons truct·ed in the Easement. hy· Grantee . 10_ warran~y of Ticle. Grantor ~arrancs and rep-resents t!.1.at. G:r:antor is the fee !:impl~ owner of the Sasemen~ Pro~rty and thac Grantor has full r1gh~, ticle and -2 - authoricy. cha~ this Grant is effective to grant and convey to G-rant:ee the Water Line-Easement, and 't.hat: i:.h.is Grant: of an ~asement is superior to all ct.her grancs. Granter furth~r cc7~nants and aQ"l:"ees ~o indemnifv , def~nd and hold Grante~ h.a.r.nless from aiid agains~ any acverse claim to the title of ~he Easement Proper~y by all eind ~rf person or persons lawfully claiming or to c l aim the whole er any par~ c.hereof. 11. Bi~ding Eff~ct. Thi~ Grant shall ex~end co and be binding upcn the heirs, personal repres~nc.acives, succaasors a.od assigns of ~he respecti.,~ parties hexet:o. The ~erms, ccvenane~, acreements and conditions in chis Grani:. shall be const:ru.l!!d as covenants running wit:h th~ land. !N WITNESS WHEREOF, ~he part.ie~ her~co has ~x~cuted this Crane 0£ Water Line Ea~emen~ the day and year £irst above: wri.t ten_ Attest: STAIE OF COLORJ\.00 S.S.- COUNTY OF ~cknowl~dged b~fore me. citia J une , l9 98 by and Lori ~r Miller Address;-----~----~-- d~y of Stephen M. Miller . as Gran tors ----~-----~--------··--· , . . : EMILIE · LEMAN : , , 1 NOTARY PUBLIC I , ' ~ S.TATE OF COLORADO : _,,,_,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~,, My Commi ssion Expir es July 3, 2000 My Commi~~ion expires: __________ _ -3 - .. At:t:est.; Grantee! STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUN'Z'Y OP ARAPAHOE ) Acknowledged before m@ this day 0£ June , 19~3~8 ________ by~~--~~~~~~------ as~------~~----~------~~----ana ~~~--~~--~~----~~-Gr an tee ~s~~~--------~----~~----~ Notary Public Add~SS: ~------~~-------------- My .Commission EXpires=~----------~----~ -4 - EXHIBIT A EASEMENT PROPERTY Parcel 1: Beginning at the ~ C!)rner of .Plot 3, .Block 3,'. ~a.ir:s Forest Hill oodition to City of Ehgle~od, Arapahoe .County, Colorado; theoce Nort.'.ie?:l"y ~nd ~long -the west line:;'6£ saicl.. P1ot 3 ~ distance · of :75 , feet;· then6e £.asterlf an::L :!.lono the . South l.in!:! of a .far=el _ descr:i~ ··in)~~;i'i~k .:ue9 ;:at::,'P?ge. ·, 330 I J\rapahoe '. Q:iunty · ~OrdS _jo a distance Of: .7 .•:44 feet;. thence . southerly' an:3 .rar:allel ·to ·the" ~st l'ine of. sai_d. Plo·+~<· 3 a· . . , . dist<!n~ of '25 ;e7· ·f~.t to a ~int . vf~~o.u ...... ature: t..'rlerice 16. 3:3 · f~t along t."le · arc . of a CUt'Ve to t.~e ".le£t':havi~g . a·; :radius · Of . . 15 fae.t.. ftnd : .. a · cential angl"e .·of 626ZJ.''32" tO a po ,ifrt ·~ of reverse o.:.rve; then...-e ,41~,92 .. ~eet alon9.' the ar~ ·of.: a;ciltve to '.'the..'right:. hz!vi'ng ~ _r3CH .us . ot.: 2~ f~t -~-a . C1??1~;.a1~.zu::;1e '.~_o::_._9.2c23' 14" to . a ncnt~ngent._point : on the .-South .line ~·of ·sald·:Plot 3;·then=e : · . Westerly 2s ·~95 f~t "'no ~lon<i the'-'sciuth . l'lne~.of.:,:saia ·., Plot 3 to the · Point· of ·Beginning, ~~nti'!lninf .'l; 275 7 ~al:e :·feet ,-more or less. Parcel 2= 'niat part of the s-l 1/4 of · the ~\!· 1/4 of the ™ l/4 of Se=t.ion 35, ~wnship 4 South, RZ!nge 68 West of the 6th P.M., described as follo'WS :· · · Camienc.ing . .!t a p::i.int. 163 £eet West cf · the SE corne.?:: of the sw · 1/4 of ~ 1/4 of t-H1 l,14 of · said Se::t·ion 35;. thc_rice West i!.long the. South line · of the .™ l/4 of ~ 1/4 of ~id Section 3S a distancg of 143 f~t: t~n=e Northerly .an::l pa~allel . with t.~ East. line of ~·SW 1/4 of. ~ 1/4 of ~ ·l/ .. of said Section ~S a distance of 319.9L f~t · to the si:· come~ of. Plot 3, Block 3, Pt""-l~i:s Forent Hill Addition ·:o the City of ~1~; then=e Eastet:ly and · along the ~uth line of said Plot. 3 a d ist!r.=1? of · 12. 00 · fegt to -:be T:ue -Point of Beginning, ~id True Point of :.Beginning lyil19 on the Easterly right of ~y of 2800 South BTE:san St=~c. dna:=iba::J . in ~k S.49 at ~ge · 59, ArG1pahoe e;,Urity Piecorde ~ th~n=e . '.F2Sterly and along siaid South line of. Plot 3 a d1stan=e of -.13.·96 feet to a point of nont~ngent .eurvabire; thence lB.51 f~t along the ar= of a curve to the · t:ight having i! radius of 26 f~t and a ~~ntral angl@ of 40046'52• to·a nontangent point on the ~asterly right af way of 2800 Sout~ EmerRon deecrib~d in aook 948 at pa9~ 59, Arapahoe County Rec~rdsr thene~ North@rly and . along said Easterly right ~f way a diatanc~ of 11~55 feet . to th~ Tru~ Point of Beginning, cont~ining 100 ~quare · f!~t, mer~ or less. -· . ' NOTE: The foregoing real property is the same property as that which is subject to the Resolution 31 Series of 1985 and the Grant of Permanent Easement which are attached hereto as Exhibits A-1 and A-2, respectivel y . -·· ' " I I' ,\ " \ , ',~. ·~ ,"I ·' R~rd~ 11t ~ • .J l o'~\e dAUG " 7 1995 'Rtc-etitlc2s;:.'07.G1 . HAr~r.i:: !'. l ':\l :r.. nrr•m1,r RESOt.m'!ON oo.Jl. SERIES OF 1985 EXHIB I T A-1 l\ IW)OLUTION N:CEPTI~ GRANI' OF rJ\SEMEm . F'RQ1 ~ICHARD T. BICl<HMOr JR~ MtJ MM.JORIE J, a re~ roR mEET PURrosr.:s rn cet.u;TTHJ:Tlati o~ ~ CUL DE SN: ~ EMD&!N STRm ~ ~MT OF PAVI~ DISTlUCT 00 .. JO. WRERF:AS, tho 2800 blo::k of s. ~rBOn Street i• inclt.:ded in Paving Distriet ~. 30; a~ ~~. th49 ftXittio; •tret1t dead en::3! at ~ City Ditch in front of -'882 s. !merson St.rMt·, ~ by trKJ BieXhardfl, ~o tequ41ated t.h.!t tr-~ty eonat.t\.11:~ a ~l de M<= at. th@ dcaad lt'rl to tae1litAts turninq ot lar9• v9hicl•• 1\lCh ae fir• trucks an:! tra•h pickup true~ J an:!. ~, d ty ha• l'q~: on tl'W eorrH ti on it. t:eeei w~ a permanent. es~t· fran e,. propatty o-wnere on ....tiich part of the . cul d~ Mc ~uld bm ~nstructod1 an:i ~, the propi1rty owngrs ha'le ar;reed · to grant an 4!-a~ent to the City .wtietaey they reta~n ownerahip of. ~~ ptoparty necessary to moot· futur• eoMtr.uction/lot-covt!r89a :equirl!!m41ntzq ~' TttER~, BE IT RF.SOLVED BY M ClT'i COOOCIL OF . THE CITY OF~, OX.ORAOO~ Sec~ion l. 'that the Grmt of Eaamant by · RichaJ:d . T. · · 9iclth.atd, J-c. aoo Hat'jorie J," Bickh~rd to the City of ~le'#OOd for ttr•t put?'1Mt1 in con•t:uctin;. a C'Ul de sac· at: the dead ~ of s. ftrtetlCln s~::e'9t in tM 2900 block-is htn•®y eccepted. A eopy of ·aaid Grant o! £!~t is at:t!t=}laj hereto erd incotporated her.sin by reference .. 1'00PrEO ANO APPROVED thi11 19th day Of ~u:st:.,' l9as·. ' 11 Cnry R. HiQbee, •• o~!icio City ClAr~-T:ttasurwr of thG City ot l'h;l~, CDlorado, n.tt•by et!ttity tn. ~oc~ng to oo & ttue, sccurate, afld ~pleta eopy of ~solution ?t>. I , 5'lril!s of 1995. · · . ~t~y ........ ~.-...~ ..... ~ EXHIBIT A-2 GiWJ'7 OF PER'-V\NENT EA.S £7'\ENT · ~c u45c7 =:. ·i 454 KN™ '4.LL MEN BY THLSE PRESENTS, that RICHARDT. BlC~RD, JR, and MARJORIE J. BlC!<HARD of 2882. s .. Emerson Str~t, ~l~ocd, Colorado 80110, for an:l in eonsideration of '!'en collars ard other tJoo::'l a.rd' valuable consideration, in hard paid, do hereby grant and ~onvey to the CITY or £NGL&;OOD, COLORAOO, .a municipal cortx'ration duly organized and ex is ting under· am by vittue of the Cons ti tut ion of the St~te of Colorado, a perman~nt . eas~ent for st:ect p.Jrposes U?0T1 1 ~C!'OSS, in, through ard \ID:3et the foll.owing aesc:-ibe:J parcels cf rea1 property situate in .the City of Ehglffiilood, County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado, to ~it: _ . " Parcel 1: .. · .. ~ ·.. . '· ... Beginning at the Sil corner ' of ":Plot 3, Block 3, M::Clai~s Forest Hill ~di tion to City'"of ,.;Englewood,. Arapahoe ,.O:mnty, Colorado; thence ~rthex:ly · aoo :~long .~.the West:· line:; of said .. Plot 3 ~ distance" of :75 , feet·;·~·,thence .::·Fasterly' and :-:!.1ong the . 9:Juth l.ine of a .f~n:cel _ descr:i~ ··.in ,_.ao ·a.k .'.ll69 ;:at::,·page · 330 ,l\.rapahoe . County ·Reeords _·,\;~a ~.clistani:-e"~ of' .7 .. .44 ·:·:feet:. thence . southerly .~~ .ra~:allei_;Jto::·~'tnedWest':~l'irie j'.of'. sai~.?~Plc·t · 3 a· disti!nee of 2s .·s7 /f~~,i~~o ~a~1::01n-t . o·f ~·O.ltvature ;;.-· tfierice i ·6. 33 . fet:?t .·along the· arc . of .,'.a ·:~~cu rve ':)_to .i_t.'lie ".left·:havirig '~·.-'radius of . . 15 feet . and> a · centzaft.'angfe i{o£~.·G2o2J.''32~\.'t0 ,;:a·~:i7:o.ifrf ~ of revet Se c:w:ve; tllence l 4 l ~,92 . feet ~·:along'f:th~.·;; ar·~~~ of .: .. a'; 'ciJtve' ':'to ':the. ·right. • I • 1 ~ I • I '~ , , , •• \ '. "\..° ·•" -~ "I , ••, i,. •', " •'" , • ..... \ ~;· ,·•-, , hl!v ing ~ r3d1us . of. 26 ·~feet,:am :~a }central~nrtj1e <c£\-,92o23' 14" to . a nontang'ent .,'point:' on :; the').sO\jtff~·:·iine\:ofr-Sa.id :~pfof:.~:;;. thenee : . Westerly 25 ·. 96 feoet arid ·~ioifcj jl_the ','.~sOutnzt l'ine ;~of ;_:sa'id:' Plot· 3 to the , ~int · of.~~inning ~· ·cont~lriing ·:·1; 275 7 stjUifre :·feet, ·more or :::~l 2: ' ... ,' :.' +·~~:.:+,' -''· <• _,' : 'n:iat part or· th@ ~ 1/4 of · the N;v 1/4 of the ™ l/4 of Section 35, Township 4 South, Fange 68 West of the 6th P.M., described as follo'WS:-· ~ncing . ~t a ?Jint. 163 feet West cf · the . SE corner of the ~· 1/4 of ~ 1/4 of ~ l/4 of · said Sect·ion 35~. th€nce West along the. South line · of the ™ l/4 of Ni1 l/4 of saia Section 35· a dista~ of 143 f~t; th@nce ~rtherly .ard pa~allel. \With the East. line of tne ·ow 1/4 of.~ 1/4 of ~·1/-. cf said Section 35 a dist~nce of 319.91 feet· to the ~· corner. of. Plot 3, Block 3, H=Claits Forent Hill ~ition tc the City of ~lewood; thence F.aste::ly emd · !!long the South line of said Plot. 3 a dist!r'C1? of .. U.00 fegt to the True · POint of Beginning, naid True Point of :.Bf}ginning lying on the ~sterly right of ~'i of 2800 south Bnerson St:-eet. dl'facribe'.l . in Book 948 at page · 59, Ar21pahoe Cbl.lnty P.ecol:de ~ thenee ~sterly ard along ~id South li~ of. Plot 3 a dista~ of .. 13. 96 feet to a point of nontangent .eurv111t.ure; th€nce lB.51 feet along the arc of a curve to the · tight having a radius of 26 f~t and a • .. ..... central angle of 40o46's2• to a nontangent point on th@ !aeterly right af way of 2800 Sout~ Emerson deacrib~d in Book 848 at page 59, Arapahoe county Records1 thenc& North~rly and along said Easterly right ~f way a di1tance of 11~55 feet to the True· Point of Beginning, eont~ining 100 ~quare f@et, mor~ or less. -· Gtantors expreesl;zr. re ta 1 n all. r: igh ta ·in and . to the prop@rty which is the subj@ct of the within .ea1ement which ~ill not unrf!aaonably int:erffl!rfJ vith ot be in deroqati.on of th~ rights herein grant@d. · · The · City of Englewood,: a ·1 a eondi.tion to .this easement shall prohibit patking cn :the~ntire cul de ·sac whieh is .either embraced ·within the ~ea1emerit hetein granted ·o" formerly platted ·as:· Em~rsori Street. 'rh@ Cit.y .. shall _ e.teet apptopriat.e •no parking• ai9na and shall .entorce 'th@ .parking ...... r~st r icti on. ,. ,,,·· '-1 • .., 1 ;:J ' ·:. . /'. Q .; . ~ ,l '. "· " SIGNED and de ·liv~r4'd this : ''i \ day .. o·f .. ·· :~' r; '.l9ff~ i¢' \ .. . 'o .. .., ~ .. ,, ' ... : ..... \' . , "'I) • • , , f ' , .. •'• ,. \ ., I , ' 0--~ I ., ; ' ' ·, ·:: .. : . :: '.;. .. ·. :. ·. ' . .. .. ~-. O" ;,._ "'Q... '" t . ' ··.".· '.'',1 ,,. . . ' ·~ ,·.· _., • #~/ .._. •I ... ·.~.·..::· ..... ' ; ·• ~\, ••.•• , ,,., 1J ,·t . · .·. . . . . · .... · · . . "" r, . . ~ . ''~1: ·,~ a r i ~ ---\......~ . ..... ~.1i' •. , • ... ,, • • .. t o'"I . 1 • •I•, 1 •• "\\' . _ .. ~.~:~-~fi.ard ~'1'~~-aickfiard, ~'.· \.4f;'_:_! -~; .•. ·~ .. .-.-'·. '( ·; .. :·, . .7 ... ~::.. ... y'r ' ~. . . . . . ;/ I ;r._~- ./. -VJ" STATE ·OF . COLORADO ) .· .. ' • ' • • ~ ' I • COUNTY OF .ARAPAHOE !H·•,·· .··. ···'.,·•.·•. '/::;.;;.'.';;!' , .• Th~·· .for ego ing wa~ . acknc)wled.g@d , be.·fo ·r .f! .. ·m@ ·· ~his . .,:31 s .;._day 0£· --...~~~·...-ii .. ·-·---··, l9 '85 :by .'. R_iQbaet! T.--..s·ickhard ·, Jr •. and Mar or •. B cl< ar , ownftrS in '' joint · t8nancy of 2882 s, C:mereon Strel!t·,.. glewo~d, Colorado·.. . · ·.. · · : Witn~ss my hand and off ieial seal. My Co~miaaion @xpiresr 'r M'.)__ $1 I 96<, RocaryPUC ' Addree11 r 3 'loo s. £ ~~- .E ~_, ·~o LI CENSE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the day of , 19 ~~---,.-:-~ --,...~~~~ by and between the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, a municipal corporation of Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "City" and -. /11c-1//1£t,,. _ . Iii~ hereinafter referred to as "Licensee," WITNESSETH: The City without any warranty of its title or interest whatsoever, hereby authorizes Licensee, its successor, assigns, to install a . j:J '' 4111 T[/Z. L !/\J.C. . . over the city's rights-of-way for the city D-:tch, described as a . parcel of land situated in the SW ¥1: of 1Jtc !JI../ Y'l 4r NLJ W of Section SS-, Township f s . Range /,B µ.!€S7""" of the t;,-tJO: P.M., County of Arapahoe, State of Colorad-o~a~n~d,_,l~y-i~·n-g~w---i~t..,..-hin the following described lines: The above-described parcel contains acres, mor e or less. 1. Any constructio~'contemplated or performed under this License shall comply with and conform to standards forlI!ulated by the Director of Utilities of the City and such construction shall be performed and completed according to the plans, consisting of one sheet, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. The Licensee shall notify the City's Director of Utilities at least three (3) days prior to the time of commencement of the construction of, or any r ·epairs made Licensee's inspect such so that the city operations. may, in -its discretion, 3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of the commencement of construction of said to, ;/ 6 WAT£e L;Ale the Licensee shall complete such construction, place and maintain permanent, visible markers, of a type and at such locations as designated by the City's Director of Utilities, referring to the centerline of the installation and shall clear the crossing area of all construction debris and restore the area to its previous condition as near as may be reasonable. In the event the placing of the centerline markers and the clearing and restoration of the crossing area is not completed within the time specified, the City may complete the work at the sole expense of the Licensee. 4. The city shall have the right to maintain, install, repair, remove or relocate the City Ditch or any other of its facililties or installations within the City's rights- of-way, at any time and in such manner as the 9ity deems necessary or convenient. The City reserves the exclusive :right to control all easements and installations. In the . event the __ 6 1 1 WATC-1' L(,.,/C should interfere with any future use of the City's rights-of-way by the City, the Licensee shall, upon request and at its sole expense, relocate, rearrange, or remove its installations so as not to interfere with any such use. 5. Any repair or replacement of any City installation made necessary, in the opinion of the City's Director of Utilities because of the construction of the _ 6 11 WA r~q{ UnJ£ or other appurtenant installation thereof, shall be made at the sole expense of the Licensee. 6. The stipulation and conditions of this License shall be incorporated into contract specifications if the construction herein authorized is to be done a contract basis. 7. The rights and prYvileges g~anted in this License shall be subject to prior agreements, licenses and/or grants, recorded or unrecorded, and it shall be the Licensee's sole responsibililty to determine the existence of said documents or conflicting uses or installations. 8. The Licensee shall contact and fully cooperate with the city's personnel and the construction shall be completed without interference with any lawful, usual or ordinary flow of water through the City Ditch. Licensee shall assume all risks incident to the possible presence of such waters, or of storm waters, or of surface waters in the City Ditch. 9. All trenches or holes within the City's rights-of-way shall be backfilled and tamped to the original ground line in layers not to exceed six (6) inches loose measure to a compaction of ninety per cent (90%) standard Proctor Maximum Density. 10. Licensee, by acceptance of this license, expressly assumes full and strict liability for any and all damages of every nature to person or property caused by water from the ditch leaking through the ditch banks or pipeline at the point or points where the Licensee performs any work in connection with the crossing provided by this license. The Licensee assumes all responsibility for maintenance of the installation. 11. Licensee shall indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers asnd employees, against any and all claims, damages, actions or causes of action and expenses to which it or they may be subjected by reason of said ~II - . JO ~It TCIC. L1A.Jt ·being within and across and under the premises of the city or :bY reason of any work done or omission made by Licensee, its agents or employees, in connection with the -construction, replacement, maintenance or repair of said installation. 12. It is expressly agreed that in case of Licensee's breach of any of the within promises, the City may, at its option, have specific performance thereof, or sue for damages resulting from such breach. 13. Upon abandonment of any right or privilege herein granted, the right of Licensee to that extent shall terminate, but its obligation to indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers and employees, shall not terminate in any event. In granting the above authorization, the City reserves the right to make full use of the property involved as may be necessary or converlJ:ent in the operation of the water works plant and system unaer the control of the City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed as of the day and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: LICAGOVR LOTS 1 AND 2 BICKHARD HALF ACRE SUBDIVISION WAIVER PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 35, T. 4 S., R 68 W., OF lHE 6TH P .M., CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO "' "' al '" -4 z /; AS SHOWN ON THE RECORDED PLAT OF McCLAIRES FOREST HILL PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES BOOK 4257, PAGE 453 PLAN SCALE: 1 • -50' SW COR. Of THE SW 1/4 Of THE NW 1/4 Of THE NW 1/4 Of SECTION 3:1 P~OFILE NO CALE 1. BORE 22"<J HOLE IN EXISTING HEADWALL. CONTRACTOR TO FlELD VERIFY AND AVOID EXISTING REINFORCING (IF POSSIBLE) BEFOR BORING . RESULTING GAP SHALL BE FILLED WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT. 2. DITCH SHALL BE BACK-FlLLED TO EXISTING GRADE WITH A 503 SOIL mo 503 BENTONITE MIXTURE COMPACTIED TO CllY STAND.ARDS. 3 . PIPE EXCAVATION TO BE FlLLED WITH FLO FILL TO A DEPTH OF ONE FOOT BELOW THE EXISTING GRADE WITH A 50% SOIL mo 503 BENTONITE MIXTURE. THE ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 7000 South Broadway Suite 1-D Littleton. Colorado 80122 (303)798-4794 PROJECT No . 58501 THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD UTILITIES DEPARTMENT CITY DITCH LICENSE GRANTED TO PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. TO CROSS WITH 6" WATER LINE SCALE: NONE DATE: 2 19 98 DRN: TR: CHK : APP: DIRECTOR DR . NO. Date September 8, 1998 INITIATED BY Utilities Department COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Agenda Item Subject License Agreement with Daniel Bros t STAFF SOURCE Stewart H. Fonda , Director of Utilities COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION None . RECOMMENDED ACTION The Englewood Water and Sewer Board recommended at their August 18, 1998 meeting Council approval by motion of the Ordinance for the License Agreement with Dan iel Brost for an encroachment of a barn in a water main easement right-of-way . BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED The License Agreement is for Mr. Brest's utility barn to encroach into Englewood 's Mclellan raw water main right-of-way . The City reserves the right to make full use of the easement as necessary for the operation of the water main and is not liable for any damages to the structure . If the current owner transfers or sells the property , the encroaching structure will be removed from easement. FINANCIAL IMPACT None. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Bill for Ordinance License Agreement between the City of Englewood and Daniel C. Brost LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT, made this day of , 19_, between the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado , herein referred to as "City", and Daniel C. Brost herein referred to as "Licensee". WITNESS ETH The term "Licensee" shall include employees, agents and contractors of Licensee. The term "property" as used he rein refers to real property and includes easements, rights of way , and other City interests in land and may sometimes be referred to herein as "City property". The City, by these presents, without warranting title or interest, and subject to the covenants hereinafter set forth, does hereby authorize the Licensee, its successors and assigns , to: Keep a barn, as it is currently constructed and located as of the date of this Agreement, which currently encroaches on the City's Right-Of-Way easement for a water main, which is described as follows: A Right-Of-Way 20 feet in width, over and across Block 45 Wolhurst Hqtrs., Arapahoe County, Colorado, the center line of which is described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of Santa Fe Street, said point being 280 feet north of the south-east corner of Block 45 Wolhurst Hqtrs ., Arapahoe County, Colorado; thence west and parallel to the south line of said Block 45 to the west line of said Block 45 , the west line of B lock 45 being common to the east R.O .W . line of the Denver and Santa Fe Railroad . All located in the S.W . 1/4 of Section 32-T5S-R68W of the 61h P. M., Arapahoe County, State of Colorado. Recorded in the County of Arapahoe , Colorado Filed at Book 1524, Pages 532 -533. Dated June lo, 1964 1. In granting this License, the City reserves the right to make full use of the easement of Right-Of-Way involved as may be necessary or convenient in the operation of the City's property and the City re tains all rights to operate , maintain, install, repair, remove or relocate any of its facilities located within the City's easement of Right-Of- Way at any time and in such a manner as it deems necessary or convenient. In the event Licensee's installations should interfere with the City's use or operation of its property, at any time hereafter, Licensee shall, upon request by the City and at Licensee's sole expense, immediately relocate, rearrange or remove its installation so as not to interfere with any such City use. 2. The rights and privileges granted in this License shall be subject to prior agreements, licenses and/or grants, recorded or unrecorded, and shall be the Licensee's sole responsibility to determine the existence of said documents or conflicting uses or installations. 3. The Licensee shall have the right to maintain the above described parcel including but not limited to planting and trimming grass and/or bushes , fertilization and irrigation and removal of trash and brush. Further, the Licensee may maintain the structure described above in the easement or Right-Of-Way subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. No expansion or modification to the existing structure may be made without the express written consent of the City. 4 . In the event of an emergency or any other failure of any City owned facility within the easement or Right-Of-Way , the City will not be liable for any damages to any structures of the Licensee in the easement or Right-Of-Way due to failure of the City's facilities or any subsequent repair or maintenance activities. 5. Access to the easement of Ri ght-Of-Way, by City personnel, must be maintained by Licensee for purposes of inspection and maintenance. 6. No construction or excavation shall be allowed on this easement or Right-Of-Way without express written consent of the City. 7. Upon destruction of the structure or abandonment of any right or privilege herein granted, the right of Licensee to that extent shall terminate, but its obligation to indemnify and save harmless the City , its officers and employees, shall not terminate in any event. 8 . This License may be terminated by the City at any time with or without cause. 9. The rights granted Licensee hereunder may not be transferred or assigned without the written consent of the City. If the Licensee shall transfer or sell the property which is subject to the easement of Right-Of-Way, a ll structures encroaching into the City's easement or Right-Of-Way shall be removed from said easement or Right-Of- Way. 10. Licensee shall comply with all applicable laws and ordinances and all rules , regulations and requirements of any e nvironmental stanC.ards and conditions of the premises . If, as a result of the Licensee's occupancy of the premises and its operation hereunder , any such law, ordinance , rule or regulation is violated, Licensee shall protect, save harmless, defend and indemnify City from and against any penalties, fines, costs and expenses including legal fees and court costs incurred by the City, caused by , resulting from or connected with such violation or violations. In granting the above authorization, the City reserves the right to make full use of the easement or Right-Of-Way involved as may be necessary or convenient in the operation of the water works plant and system under the control of the City. -2- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this i nstrument has been executed as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD Stewart Fonda, Director of Utilities LICENSEE: -3 - GRANT OF CITY DITCH EASEMENT whoseaddressis 3701 S. Lbgan Street' Engl e wood, CO 80110 ATT. Lf in favor of the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD ("Grantee") whose address is 3400 S. Elati St., Englewood, Colorado 80110. The parties covenant and agree as follows : 1. Easement Property. The "Easement Property" shall mean the real property located in the County of Arapahoe , State of Colorado , more particularly described on E x hibit A, consisting of __ pages, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference . 2 . Consideration . As consideration for this Grant , Grantee has gi ven Grantor good and valuable considerations , the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by Grantor, which includes approximately si x inches (6") of topsoil with an adequate amount of Bluegrass seed for the Grantor to reseed the easement. 3. Grant of City Ditch Easement. Grantor hereby grants to Grantee, its successors and assigns , a perpetual , nonexclusi v e easement (the "City Ditch Easement) over, under, across and through the Easement Property for the purpose of constructing, operating, maintaining, repairing , replacing , removing, improving and enlarging the City Ditch . The City Ditch shall mean the City Ditch pipeline and all necessary underground and surface appurtenances thereto necessary or desirable for the transmission of water including , but not limited to, mains , conduits, vaults and v entilators . 4 . Access . Grantee shall have the perpetual , nonexclusive right of ingress and egress in , to, over, through and across the Easement Property for any purpose necessary or desirable for the full enjoyment of the r ights granted.to Grantee under this Grant. 5. Restoration. Grantee agrees that after the construction, maintenance , repair, replacement or enlargement , if any , for the City Ditch , Grantee shall restore the surface of the Easement Property as nearl y as reasonable possible to the grade and conditions it was immediately prior to said construction, maintenance , repair, replacement or enlargement, except as may be necessary to accommodate the City Ditch. Grantee ag rees to restore and repair any improv ements of Grantor on the Easement Property which are damaged, modified or altered by Grantee during said construction, maintenance , repair, replacement or enlargement. Grantee further agrees to replace an y topsoil removed from any cultivated or agricultural areas on the Easement Property and to remove any excess earth resulting from said construction, maintenance, repair , replacement or enlargement , at Grantee's sole cost and expense . 6 . No Improvements. Grantor covenants and agrees not to construct, erect , place or plan any "Improvements," as hereinafter defined , on the Easement Property without obtaining the prior written consent of Grantee . "Improvements" shall mean any structure, building , planting, trees or shrubbery other than a grass-type lawn . Grantee shall have the right to remove, without any liability to grantor, any improvements constructed, erected , placed or planted on the Easement Property without Grantee 's having obtained the prior written consent of Grantor. If such prior written consent is obtained , Grantee shall not be responsible for repair or replacement of the Impro vements if they are damaged during construction, maintaining , repair , replacement or enlargement. 7 . Subjacent and Lateral Support . Grantor co venants and agrees that Grantee shall have the right of subjacent and lateral support on the Easement Property to whatever extent is necessary or desirable for the full, complete and undisturbed enjoyment of the rights granted to Grantee under this Grant. 8 . Rights of Grantor. Grantor reserves the full right to the undisturbed ownership , use , and occupancy of the Easement Property insofar as said ownership , use , and occupancy is consistent with and does not impair the rights granted to grantee in this Grant. 9 . Abandonment. In the event that Grantee shall abandon the rights granted to it under this Grant, all rights, title and interest hereunder of Grantee shall cease and terminate, and Grantor shall hold Easement Property, as the same may then be , free from the rights of Grantee so abandoned and shall own all materials and structures of Grantee so abandoned , provided that Grantee shall have a reasonable period of time after said abandonment in which to remove any or all Lines and Appurtenances from the Easement Property. In the event that Easement is abandoned by Grantee, Grantor shall have the right , at its sole option, to require Grantee to remove or neutralize any improvements constructed in the Easement by Grantee . 10 . Warranty of Title . Grantor war rants and represents that Granter is the fee simple owner of the Easement Property and t hat Grantor has full right , title and authority, that this Grant is effective to grant and convey to Grantee the Water Line Easement , and that this Grant of an easement is superior to all other grants . Granter further convenants and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Grantee harmless from and against any adverse claim to the title to the Easement Property by all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof. 11 . Binding Effect. This Grant shall extend to and be binding upon the heirs , personal representatives , successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto . The terms, covenants, agreements and conditions in this Grant shall be construed as covenants running with the land. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto has executed this Grant of Water Line Easement the day and year first above written . ~T (/I ' L-1 d/U7~l GRANT OR: STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS . COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE ) First Church of Christ, Scientist 3701 S. Logan P.O. Box 1156 Englewood, CO Englewood, CO 80110 80150 (mailing address) Acknowledged before me this 5th day of August 19 9 8 ' -- as First Church of Christ, Scientist and Mary Ann Norblom ~ Chairman of the Board Address: 3701 S. Logan, Englewood, CO 80110 ------~---~------------------ My Commission expires: -------'--1_0_,_/_1_5--'/_2_0_0_1 ______________ _ ATTEST: GRANTEE: Title: ----------~ STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE ) Acknowledged before me this _____ day of _______ , 19 __ as ----------------------------- and ----------------------------- as ----------------------------- Notary Public Address: --------------------------- My Commission expires : ____________________ _ h/Easements/ citydtch ,A TT. S SUPPLEMENT NO . -12.fL_ TO CONNECTOR'S AGREEMENT THIS AGRE EMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, acting by and through its duly authorized Mayor and City Clerk, hereinafter called the "City," and SOUTHGATE SANITATION DISTRICT, Arapahoe and Douglas Counties, Colorado , hereinafter called the "District," WITNESS ET H: WHEREAS, on the 20th day of June, 1961 , the City and the District entered into an Agreement in which the C ity agreed to treat sewage originating from the District's sanitary sewer system within the area served by the District, which Agreement was most recently renewed by Connector's Agreement dated November 16 , 1988; and WHEREAS, said Connector's Agreement provides that the district may not enlarge its service area without the written consent of the City ; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and undertakings herein set forth , the parties agree as follows : 1. The City hereby consents to the inclusion of certain additional area located in Douglas County , Colorado , owned by Turner C . Smith Ill & Cynthia L . Smith and more fully described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference , into Southgate Sanitation District. The City agrees that said add itional area may be served with the sewer facilities of the District , and that the City will treat the sewage discharged into the City's trunk line from said additional area , all in accordance with the Connector's Agreement dated November 16, 1988. Accordingly , Exhibit A referred to in Paragraph 1 of the Connector's Agreement dated November 16 , 1988 , is hereby amended to include such additional area . 2. Each and every other provision of the said Connector's Agreement dated November 16, 1988, shall remain unchanged . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands and 3eals this __ day of , 19_. ATTEST: CITY CLERK (SEAL) ATTEST : e ~{ /L I fSCRETARY '-('8EAL) \ "~'' CITY OF ENGLEWOOD By : _________ _ MAYOR SOUTHGATE SANITATION DISTRICT, ARAPAHOE AND DOUGLAS COUNTIES, COL/~D ~ ~· (/ . By ::4L;,v~ PRESIDENT EXHIBIT A (Legal Description) Lot 1, Tom Moore Subdiv ision County of Arapahoe State of Colorado Jul-21-98 12:18P 3722 E . Orchard Rd ., Littleton. CO 8012 1 FAX TRANSMITTAL TO: Ms. Cathy Burrage FAX#: (303) 789-1125 City of Englewood -Utility Department FROM: Duane Tinsley DATE: July 21, 1998 PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 1 FAX#: PHONE#: (303) 779-0220 (303) 779-0261 RE: Smith Inclusion -Supplemental Information Relative to the Turner and Cindy Smith inclusion, and our recent conversation, I provide the following supplemental information: Location : Acreage: Present Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Present Use: Proposed Use: Schedule: North of Powers Ave. and East of South Holly Street. (see vicinity map) 1.441 acres R-1 , Single Family Residential No Change 1 single family home No Change Remodel/upgrade upon all necessary approvals , (°next year or so") Thanks for your help in getting this to the Board. *IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR IF PROBLEMS OCCUR WITH THIS TRANSMISSION PLEASE CALL 779-0261 • P.01 CHRISMAN BYNUM &JOHNSON July 2 , 1998 Mr. Stewart H . Fonda Director of Utilities City of Englewood 3400 South Elati Street Englewood, CO 80110-0110 C HRISMAN, B~N UM & JOHNSON, PC. AlTORNEYS .\N D COUNSELOR S AT LAW 1900 Fl FTEE NTH STR EET BOULDER, COLOR.\DO SOJO~ Re: Denver (96CW145) Dil. & Absolute for C.A. 3635 Dear Mr. Fonda: AT7 .. ~ TELEPHONE JOJ. 546.1 JOO FACS IM ILE J03.4-19. 5+26 E·MAI L CBJ @CBJ.COM Enclosed is a copy of Englewood's Amended Response to Thornton 's First Interrogatories , Requests for Admission and Requests for Production Relating to Standing. Please review the pleading , and if it is satisfactory sign page 11 before a notary. The original signature page should be returned to our office as soon as possible so that it may be served on opposing counsel. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns . Thank you. Very truly yours, clt2t1(itfc ___ _ / Carol E. Kelley Paralegal /eek Enc. DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION NO. 1, COLORADO Case No. 96CW145 ENGLEWOOD'S AMENDED RESPONSE TO THORNTON'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES, REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD RELATING TO STANDING CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, by and through its BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS IN DOUGLAS, ARAPAHOE, DENVER, ADAMS AND JEFFERSON COUNTIES The City of Englewood ("Englewood"), by and through its counsel, Chrisman, Bynum & Johnson, P.C., submits the following Amended Responses to Thornton's First Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, and Requests for Production to the City of Englewood Relating to Standing: GENERAL OBJECTION Thornton apparently seeks discovery related to potential injury to Englewood in this matter and Englewood's standing to participate iri this case. However, neither Englewood nor any other party is required to prove injury in order to participate in a water court proceeding of this nature.1 Therefore , Thornton 's requests are: (1) not reasonably calculated to lead to the production of admissible evidence; and (2) overbroad and unduly burdensome. Without waiving the foregoing objections, Englewood responds as follows: RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES Interrogatorv No. 1: Please describe the specific relief sought by any party in this matter, 96CW145, which if granted will injure your legally vested rights of any kind. Objection: Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for legal conclusions. Englewood objects to this interrogatory as overbroad and/or unduly burdensome to the extent that it calls for information that is readily available to Thornton through available public records. Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for discovery of matters protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work product doctrine , or the limitations on discovery of facts and opinions held by experts as stated in C.R.C.P. 26. Without waiving the 1 In fact, if injury is the appropriate standard for participation in this matter, then Thornton lacks standing because it was not diverting (nor was its lack of diversion related to Denver's exchange) on the days the exchanges in question were operated. foregoing objections , Englewood responds as follows: Response: The City of Denver seeks to m ake absolut e a conditionally decreed exchange using a variety of sources of substitute supply, including effluent discharged from Bi-City WWTP ( also known as Littleton/Englewood WWTP). The City of Thornton seeks to impose upon the Bi-City W\.VTP its alleged :water quality requirements on such exchanges by arguing , inter alia , that some or all of Denver's exchanges were unlawful because effluent from the Bi-City WWTP adversely affected the quality of the water in the South Platte River in a manner that is legally impermissible. Interrogatory No. 2: Please describe the resolution of this matter, e.g., the provision(s) of the resulting decree , not specified in the relief sought by any party, which will injure your legally vested rights of any kind . Objection: Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for legal conclusions. Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for discovery of matters protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work product doctrine , or the limitations on discovery of facts and opinions held by experts as stated in C.R.C.P. 26 . Without waiving the foregoing objections , Englewood responds as follows: Response: The decree in this matter may contain terms , conditions, stipulations, factual findings , and/or legal determinations that may affect Englewood's water rights and/or contractual rights described below. The decree in this matter may contain terms, conditions , stipulations, factual findings, and/or legal determinations that may affect the discharge requirements imposed on the Bi-City WWTP (in which Englewood has a one-half ownership interest) by the Colorado Water Quality Control Division or other entities. The decree in this matter may contain terms, conditions , stipulations, factual findings , and/or legal determinations that may affect the contractual rights and obligations of Bi-City WWTP or its owners to provide wastewater treatment services to , or for the benefit of, third parties (e.g. Denver). Interrogatory No. 3 : Please identify al!' such legally vested rights, including legally vested water rights, which will be so injured. Objection: Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for legal conclusions. Englewood objects to this interrogatory as over broad and/or unduly burdensome to the extent that it calls for information that is readily available to Thornton through available public records. Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for discovery of matters protected by the attorney/client privilege , the work product doctrine , or the limitations on discovery of facts and opinions held by experts as stated in C.R.C .P. 26. Without waiving the foregoing objections , Englewood responds as follow s : Response: Englewood owns the following water rights and is a signatory to the following agreements that may be injured by any decree issued by the Court in this matter: Case No. 96CW145 -ENGLEWOOD'S AMENDED RESPONSE TO THORNTON'S DISCOVERY RE : STANDING Page 2 Name of water right Case Number Date Court CITY DITCH Original District 8 12110/1883 District Court for Adjudication Douglas County RANCH CREEK COLLECTION CA657 03/21/1941 District Court for Grand SYSTEM County NEV ADA DITCH & PLATTE CANON CA1706 02/09/1950 District Court for DITCH Douglas County BOREAS No. 2 DITCH CA1709 10/26/1937 District Court for Summit County BOREAS No. 2 DITCH CA1709 01/09/1961 District Court for Summit County MCLELLAN RESERVOIR CA3635 05/18/1972 District Court for Douglas County TRIBUTARY WELLS CA3635 05/18/1972 District Court for Douglas County Consolidated Civil 1955 U.S. District Court for RANCH CREEK COLLECTION Case Nos. 2782, the District of Colorado SYSTEM 5016,5017 RANCH CREEK COLLECTION W-750-78 01/21/1980 Division 5 Water Court SYSTEM TRIBUTARY WELLS W-6588 0511811972 Division 1 Water Court MCBROOM DITCH W-8270-76 11/2711980 Division 1 Water Court OLSEN AND BELL DITCH W-8271-76 fl/25/1980 Division 1 Water Court GUIRAUD DITCH W-8345-76 01/16/1979 Division 1 Water Court SOUTH PLA TIE EXCHANGE W-8456-76 07/01/1983 Division 1 Water Court PETERSBURG, NEV ADA, & PLA TIE 80CW035 09/05/1989 Division 1 Water Court CANON DITCHES DUNBAR No. 3 DITCH 84CW057 06/26/1987 Division 1 Water Court 86CW223 05/05/1989 J.D. BROWN & LITTLE DRY 85CW324 08/0211990 Division 1 Water Court CREEK DITCHES Case No . 96CW145 -ENGLEWOOD'S AMENDED RESPONSE TO THORNTON'S DISCOVERY RE: STANDING Page 3 Name of water right COMO RESERVOIR BROWN DITCH SOUTH PLA TIE EXCHANGE NEV ADA DITCH MCBROOM DITCH NONTRIBUTARY GROUND WATER NONTRIBUTARY AND Nor- NONTRIBUTARY GROUND WATER MCBROOM MUNICIPAL INTAKE MCLELLAN RESERVOIR ENLARGEMENT & REFILL MCBROOM DITCH EXCHANGE UNION A VENUE INTAKE LITTLE DR Y CREEK, BIG DRY CREEK, & CITY DITCH PLAN OF EXCHANGE AUGMENTATION PLAN FOR NOT- NONTRIBUTARY AND NONTRIBUTARY GROUND WATER RIGHTS Agreement or Lease With Case Number 85CW393 86CW014 87CW014 88CW202 88CW203 89CW061 89CW062 89CW063 90CW219 90CW220 90CW221 90CW222 90CW223 92CW030 Date of Agreement THORNTON 1977 CENTENNIAL WATER AND SANITATION 1980 DISTRICT CENTENNIAL WATER AND SANITATION · 1986 DISTRICT Date Court 09/04/1990 Division 1 Water Court 04/17/1989 Division 1 Water Court 05/03/1990 Division 1 Water Court 06/06/1990 Division 1 Water Court 02/11/1991 Division 1 Water Court 08/1711992 Division 1 Water Court 08/17/1992 Division 1 Water Court 03/29/1994 Division 1 Water Court 0710511994 Division 1 Water Court 03/22/1995 Division 1 Water Court 01/11/1995 Division 1 Water Court Approved from Bench 08/02/1994 Division 1 Water Court 03/24/1997 Division 1 Water Court 05/18/1993 Division 1 Water Court Related Water Case No. Court Case No . 96CWI45 -ENGLEWOOD'S AMENDED RESPONSE TO THORNTON'S DISCOVERY RE : STANDING Page 4 CENTENNIAL WATER AND SANITATION 1990 DISTRICT DENVER, CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS COMPANY , CYPRUS CLIMAX METALS COMPANY DENVER THORNTON AND WESTMINSTER SOUTH SUBURBAN PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT LITTLETON 1995 1991 1990 1992 1992 90CW082 86CW397 88CW267 89CW129 89CW132 89CW061 89CW062 89CW063 89CW062 Division 1 Water Court Division 1 Water Court Division 1 Water Court Division 1 Water Court In addition, Englewood has a one-half ownership interest in the Bi-City WWTP, whose interests may be injured as described in Englewood's Responses to Interrogatories No. 2 and 4 herein. Interrogatorv No. 4 : For each such right asserted by you to be injured, please describe the injury as well as the specific factual basis for your assertion of injury. Objection: Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for legal conclusions. Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for discovery of matters protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work product doctrine, or the limitations on discovery of facts and opinions held by experts as stated in C.R.C.P. 26. Without waiving the foregoing objections, Englewood responds as follows: Response: The decree in this matter may contain terms , conditions, stipulations, factual findings , and/or legal determinations that may interfere with or restrict Engl~wood'.s exercise of its water and/or contractual rights described herein. The decree in this matter may contain terms, conditions, stipulations, factual findings, and/or legal determinations that may result in significant financial injury to Bi-City WWTP (and, thereby, Englewood) in the form of: (1) capital expenditures; (2) interference with contractual rights and obligations to treat wastewater owned by third -parties ; and/or (3) fine~ and/or penalties resulting from governmental enforcement actions. Interrogatorv No. 5: Please identify the legal and factual position(s) you will take in this matter to protect your legally vested rights from injury. Case No . 96CW145 -ENGLEWOOD'S AMENDED RESPONSE TO THORNTON'S DISCOVERY RE : STANDING Page 5 Objection: Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for legal conclusions. Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it prematurely requires Englewood to establish its legal and factual positions in this matter at a time when discovery is ongoing and, in fact, has barely begun. Englewood objects to this interrogatory as over broad and/or unduly burdensome to the extent that it calls for information that is readily available to Thornton through available public records. Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for discovery of matters protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work product doctrine, or the limitations on discovery of facts and opinions held by experts as stated in C.R.C.P. 26. Without waiving the foregoing objections, Englewood responds as follows: Response: Englewood will take the position that Thornton has no right to impose its alleged quality requirements on Denver in this matter and that Denver's exchanges, to the extent that they relate in any way to effluent discharges by Bi-City WWTP, fully comply with all applicable laws. Interrogatory No. 6: Please describe any bases for your standing to participate in this matter, other than as provided in response to the foregoing interrogatories and request for admission. Objection: Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for legal conclusions. Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that there is no "foregoing request for admission." Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for discovery of matters protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work product doctrine, or the limitations on discovery of facts and opinions held by experts as stated in C.R.C.P. 26. Without waiving the foregoing objections, Englewood responds as follows: Response: Englewood has standing to participate in this matter pursuant to statute. Interrogatory No. 7: To the extent you assert injury based on your ownership or operation of the Bi-City WWTP, please describe in detail: a. The nature of your ownership of the Bi-City WWTP, and b. The nature of your operation of the Bi-City WWTP,,and c. The specific injury which you assert will result to your ownership or operation of the Bi-City WWTP. Objection: Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for legal conclusions. Englewood objects to this interrogatory as over broad and/or unduly burdensome to the extent that it calls for information that is readily available to Thornton through available public records. Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for discovery of matters protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work product doctrine, or the limitations on Case No. 96CWl45 -ENGLEWOOD'S AMENDED RESPONSE TO THORNTON'S DISCOVERY RE: STANDING Page 6 discovery of facts and opinions held by experts as stated in C.R.C.P. 26. Without waiving the foregoing objections, Englewood responds as follows: Response: a. See Documents numbered 00151 through 00206 attached hereto. b. See Documents numbered 00207 through 00377 attached hereto. c. See Responses to Interrogatories No. 2, 3, and 4. Interrogatory No. 8: In the event you allege injury to the rights decreed in 92CW030: a. Please admit that Englewood's vested rights decreed therein will be available for reexamination by the Court upon Thornton's motion or petition following the resolution of 96CW145. b. If the answer to the foregoing is other than an unqualified admission, please describe the specific factual bases for the answer. Objection: Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for legal conclusions. Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that Thornton's continuing attempts to prospectively invoke claim and/or issue preclusion are entirely without factual or legal basis and should be subject to appropriate san.ctions if continued. Englewood objects to this interrogatory as over broad and/or unduly burdensome to the extent that it calls for information that is readily available to Thornton through available public records. Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for discovery of matters protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work product doctrine, or the limitations on discovery of facts and opinions held by experts as stated in C.R.C.P. 26. Without waiving the foregoing objections, Englewood responds as follows: Response: a. Denied. b. Thornton has no legal or factual basis for motion or petition to reexamine Englewood's rights in 92CW030; Thornton is barred by an agreement between Thornton and Englewood and/or an Order of this Court from making such motion or stipulation; and/or the factual finding~ and/or legal determinations made by the Court in this matter may or may not have any applicability or relevance to Englewood's rights in 92CW030. Case No. 96CW145 -ENGLEWOOD'S AMENDED RESPONSE TO THORNTON'S DISCOVERY RE: STANDING Page 7 Interrogatory No. 9: In the event you allege injury to the rights decreed in 89CW063: a. Please admit that Englewood's vested rights decreed therein will be available for reexamination by the Court upon Thornton's motion or petition following the resolution of 96CW145. b. If the answer to the foregoing is other than an unqualified admission, please describe the specific factual bases for the answer. Objection: Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for legal conclusions. Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that Thornton's continuing attempts to prospectively invoke claim and/or issue preclusion are entirely without factual or legal basis and should be subject to appropriate sanctions if continued. Englewood objects to this interrogatory as over broad and/or unduly burdensome to the extent that it calls for information that is readily available to Thornton through available public records. Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for discovery of matters protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work product doctrine, or the limitations on discovery of facts and opinions held by experts as stated in C.R.C.P. 26. Without waiving the foregoing objections, Englewood responds as follows: Response: a. Denied. b. Thornton has no legal or factual basis for motion or petition to reexamine Englewood's rights in 89CW063; Thornton is barred by an agreement between Thornton and Englewood and/or an Order of this Court from making such motion or stipulation; and/or the factual findings and/or legal determinations made by the Court in this matter may or may not have any applicability or relevance to Englewood's rights in 89CW063. Interrogatorv No. 10: Please describe any other exchange, plan for augmentation, or substitute supply plan in addition to those described above, that uses Bi-City effluent as a source of substitute supply and in which Englewood asserts a legally vested i!1terest. Objection: Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for legal conclusions. Englewood objects to this interrogatory as over broad and/or unduly burdensome to the extent that it calls for information that is readily available to Thornton through available public records. Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for discovery of matters protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work product doctrine, or the limitations on discovery of facts and opinions held by experts as stated in C.R.C.P. 26. Without waiving the foregoing objections, Englewood responds as follows: Case No. 96CW145 -ENGLEWOOD'S AMENDED RESPONSE TO THORNTON'S DISCOVERY RE: STANDING Page 8 Response: Englewood's decree in Case No. 90CW223 provides for use of Bi-City effluent as a source of substitute supply . Interrogatory No . 11: Please describe, by date , every instance when effluent from Bi-City WWTP has been used as substituted water in the operation of any conditional or absolute water right as well as in any temporary substitute supply plan, which has been identified in response to the above interrogatories. Objection: Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for legal conclusions. Englewood objects to this interrogatory as over broad and/or unduly burdensome to the extent that it calls for information that is readily available to Thornton through available public records. Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for discovery of matters protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work product doctrine , or the limitations on discovery of facts and opinions held by experts as stated in C.R.C.P. 26. Without waiving the foregoing objections , Englewood responds as follows: Response : See Documents numbered 00378 through 00424 attached hereto. Interrogatory No . 12 : Please identify a. By question number/letter, all persons who participated in the collection of information for or the formulation of the responses to the foregoing questions. b. By question number/letter, all persons with knowledge relating to the responses to the foregoing quest ions. c. By question number/letter, all documents referred to in formulating the above responses or relating to the content of those responses . Objection: Englewood objects to this interrogatory as unduly burdensome to the extent it requires Englewood to identify all persons with knowledge prior to the due date for Englewood's Initial Rule 26 disclosures. Englewood objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for discovery of matters protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work product doctrine, or the limitations on discovery of facts and opinions held by experts as stated in C.R.C.P. 26. Without waiving the foregoing objections , Englewood responds as follows: ·. · Response: a. Stewart Fonda, Dennis Sto w e, and Joe Tom Wood participated in the collection of information and/or the formulation of all of the above Responses. Joe Pershin participated in the collection of information provided in Response to Interrogatory No . 11. Cas e No . 96CW145 -ENGL EWOOD'S AMENDED RESPONSE TO THORNTON'S DISCOVERY RE : STANDING Pa ge 9 b. See Response a. above. c. See Response to Request for Production No. 1 below. RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION Request for Production No. 1: Please produce all documents identified above. Objection: Englewood objects to this request for production as over broad and/or unduly burdensome to the extent that it calls for documents that are readily available to Thornton through available public records or are already in the possession of Thornton. Englewood objects to this request for production to the extent that it calls for discovery of matters protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work product doctrine, or the limitations on discovery of facts and opinions held by experts as stated in C.R.C.P. 26. Without waiving the foregoing objections, Englewood responds as follows: Response: All of the documents relating to the water rights and/or contractual rights identified in Response to Interrogatory No. 3, the agreements with third-parties referenced in Response to Interrogatories No. 2 and 4, the agreements between Englewood and Thornton referenced in Response to Interrogatories No. 8 and 9, and the water rights identified in Response to Interrogatory No. 10 -and not withheld based on the objections stated above-will be made available upon reasonable request for inspection and copying at the offices of Chrisman, Bynum & Johnson, P.C., 1900 15th Street, Boulder, CO 80302. Documents relating to the nature of Englewood's ownership of Bi-City WWTP are attached hereto and numbered 00151 through 00206 . The most recent documents relating to the nature of Englewood's operation of Bi-City WWTP are attached hereto and numbered 00207 through 00377. Previous editions of the same or similar documents will be made available upon reasonable request for inspection and copying at the offices of Bi-City WWTP, 2900 S. Platte River Drive, Englewood, CO 80110. Documents relating to Englewood's use of effluent from Bi-City WWTP in the operation of a water right are attached hereto and numbered 00378 through 00424. Request for Production No. 2: Please produce any other documents which relate to your answers to the foregoing interrogatories and requests for admissions. Objection : Englewood objects to this request for production as over broad and/or unduly burdensome to the extent that it calls for documents that are readily available to Thornton through available public records or are already in the possession of Thornton. Englewood objects to this request for production to the extent that it calls for discovery of matters protected by the attorney/client privilege , the work product doctrine, or the limitations on discovery of Case No . 96CW145 -ENGLEWOOD'S AMENDED RESPONSE TO THORNTON'S DISCOVERY RE : STANDING Page 10 facts and opinions held by experts as stated in C.R.C.P. 26. Without waiving the foregoing objections, Englewood responds as follows: Response: See Response to Request for Production No. 1 above. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Colorado that Englewood's Response to Thornton's First Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, and Requests for Production to the City of Englewood Relating to Standing are true and correct. By: 51-:~~ ~ Stewart Fonda City of Englewood J .. ,~-; The above and foregoing was subscribed and sworn to before me this 9 -1 h day of Ame , 1998, by Stewart Fonda. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: __ 7'--, _I _,'" ........ · ;-/_v =-8 __ _ AS TO OBJECTIONS: Dated: July 2, 1998 CHRIS AN, BYNUM & JOHNSON, P.C. avid . Hill , # 921 ck M. Graves, # 24576 1900 Fifteenth Street Boulder, CO 80302 Telephone: (303) 546-1300 Facsimile: (303) 449-5426 SPECIAL WATER COUNSEL FOR OPPOSER THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD Case No. 96CW145 -ENGLEWOOD'S AMENDED RESPONSE TO THORNTON'S DISCOVERY RE: STANDING Page 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on July_, 1998 a true and correct copy of the forego ing ENGLEWOOD'S AMENDED RESPONSE TO THORNTON'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES, REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD RELATING TO ST ANDING was placed in the United States mail, postage pre- paid, to the following: Casey S. Funk Denver Water Department Legal Division 1600 West 12th A venue Denver, CO 80254 William H. Brown Fischer, Brown & Gunn P. 0. Box Q Fort Collins, CO 80522 Larry Berkowitz Littleton City Attorney's Office 2255 West Berry Avenue Littleton, CO 80165 Gilbert Marchand David L. Harrison Moses, Wittemyer, et. al. 1002 Walnut, Suite 300 P. 0. Box 1440 Boulder, CO 80306-1440 Frederick Fendel Petrock & Fendel P.C. 1630 Welton Street, Suite 200 Denver, CO 80202 c (f Charles B. White Petros & White, LLC 730 17th St., #820 Denver, CO 80202-3518 Michael D. White Sarah A. Klahn White & Jankowski 511 16th Street, Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 John P. Akolt, III Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company 80 S. 27th A venue Brighton, CO 80601 Case No. 96CW145 -ENGLEWOOD'S AMENDED RESPONSE TO THORNTON'S DISCOVERY RE: STANDING Page 12 ST ATE OF COLORADO Roy Romer , Governor ATT. 7 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER John W . Mumma , Director 6060 Broadway Denver , Colorado 80 216-1000 Telephone : (303) 297-1192 For Wildlife- For People Mr. Stewart Fonda, Utilities Director City Of Englewood July 24 , 1998 3400 S. Elati Englewood , CO. 80110 Dear Stewart : I am writing this letter to you concerning the possible reopening of McLellan for public fishin g. I receive a number of inquiries each season over the prospects of getting McLellan Reservoir reopened to fishing recreation. Discussions with various anglers/angler groups leave me with the impression that McLellan Reservoir was a popular fishing spot and offered excellent fishing . I understand that McLellan was open in the past , but was shut down due to trash problems, late-night parties and the like. Certainl y these problems should be addressed and I would like to offer some suggestions targeting these areas of concern: 1) Post open/closed hours for the reservoir/park. 2) Charge a user fee to alleviate expenses for park rangers , trash dumpsters, etc. 3) Open the south side , only , to foot traffic, bank fishermen and parking , but do allow belly boating and other non-motorized craft . (This would allow accessibility to the entire reservoir and in a quiet manner. 4) Prohibit alcoholic beverages. These are a few ideas I would offer for making the opening of McLellan Reservoir a workable one. In short, I want to be involved if you decide to reopen McLellan Reservoir at some point in the future . It would be a good one to have available to the fishing public and ranks high on their list. I can be reached at 303 -291-7232 if you have any questions or want to discuss further. Thanks for your time. DJN /djn Enclosure cc: Steve Puttmann, Wildlife Manager V-B Brian Gray, DWM file Wildlife Manager 2-B DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, James S. Lochhead, Executive Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION : Arnold Salazar, Chairman • Rebecca Frank , Vice Chairman • Mark LeValley , Secretary Rev . Jesse Langston Boyd, Jr .. Member• William R. Hegberg, Member • James R. Long, Member John Stulp, Member • Louis Swift, Member MEMORANDUM To : Stu Fonda, Director of Utilities From: John Bock, Utilities Manager of Administration~ Date: August 4 , 1998 Subject: Mr. Gary Johnson, 3021 W . Bellewood Dr. AT1. 8 I would like to take issue with the comment card Mr. Johnson sent the City Manager's office . Kerry left me a note regarding Mr. Johnson's call. She noted that he , himself, was very rude , even threatening . Mr. Johnson called Kerry during a power outage . Kerry was sitting in a dark office with no computers running . The only thing working was t he telephone . Kerry took Mr. Johnson's call and ~xplained the situation to him and that there was nothing she could do right then because the computers were down . She could not look at his account at all. Mr. Johnson was completely unsympathetic to Kerry's situation and wouldn't accept her explanation. I have , over the years , received complaints from customers about every member of our department, yourself included . In my experience, a significant percentage of those who complain about the "rudeness" of a City employee are themselves very rude . With Mr. Johnson this is certainly the case. h :~bo ck\docs\3 021 beld.wpd Printed on Recycled Paper.~ .. City of Englewood OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER Gary Sears, City Manager July 30, 1998 Gary Johnson 3021 W. Bellewood Dr. Englewood, CO 80110 Dear Mr. Johnson: 3400 South E.lati Street E.nglewood, Colorado 80 I I 0-2304 Phone (303) 762-2311 FAX (303) 762-2408 E-mail: info@ci.englewood.co.us Please accept my appreciation for taking the time to fill out and return the "Dear City Manager" comment card. Customer service is very important to us, and I apologize that your experience with our Utilities Department was not satisfactory. I am forwarding your concerns to the Director of the Utilities Department so that we can take steps to alleviate this type of problem in the future. Again, thank you for your interest, and for your willingness to get involved by making your opinions known. ,~truly~ Gary Seas City Manager Do you have Name : -{].,tty ~To 111.)StJ&@!J) )SI Comments Address ::30 2/ t,1.,1, &//c:.,uJarl. l>r. D Suggestions or D Requests for Service City/State/Zip:£n5/eu J!Jcd) Ch.&J//tJ for the City of Englewood? Phone : 303-7,30-3;:>8' 8" Note them below and drop this postage-paid card in the mail to us Dear City Manager: Ca..eu d D x.-'7-17-9 8 17.-2.3. aA-· ~7 w t... _ C\:.Jl<l.il 4-wcw a.. .i~ }US)~. 0 .klj:J!Jb -1-o ·~ ~ ~;u.f_~&_ ~ ~i t.: /-: -~~ CZ.. /LR.3 uJ2aJ1.,:::f~Yl-(J) ~ ~ yY(_a..J "¥-J/1,u.dcf.,e.,~ ~~~1 £~ ~CtZ.J.. lJ.-12_ ~ &,u_ ><---la..:t:e.: wdk.J Yr/~~ ljuLu c~ U ~ y Y-fuxt:_ . ~ LUeu> U-£!::::! fl.-u~ :J 6 a:2-<...L ~ ~ f a:tvv ~ n a /,,.-J,U _ u.)t::.-.2 Ct~ ~~n .....L-~ • fu_ CL ~OJ( c; -t;(/~ ~ 1 ~)(£ a, /U tjuft:i.A; J tJn_, i;z ~ ~Ol'>U./z.-J ~ d_,o yl.A) e:' ~~a:t.v ~ :br...e.c±1--~ -./~a.. r-:--'-"-";..<...J(..A--'..:,./ ~ J..._,LJ ~u__,,J ,-!) 1 /?'l_ ru>c tA--C ~c,