HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-12-10 WSB AGENDAWATER & SEWER BOARD
AGENDA
Tuesday, December 10, 2002
COUNTY LINE BARBEQUE -8351 SOUTH PARK LANE
(COUNTY LINE AND BROADWAY)
1. MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 12 , 2002 MEETING. (ATT . 1)
2. LICENSE AGREEMENTS -ENSOR/LARGE ANIMAL CLINIC FOR SANTA
FE WIDENING PROJECT. (ATT. 2)
3. ARTICLE FROM NOVEMBER 11, 2002 ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS -"A
WAR ABOUT WATER." (ATT. 3)
4. OTHER.
WATER AND SEWER BOARD
MINUTES
November 12, 2002
A TT. I
The meeting was called to order at 5:04 p.m.
Members present:
Members absent:
Also present:
Clark, Higday, Cassidy, Kasson, Habenicht
Wolosyn, Moore, Otis, Bradshaw
Stewart Fonda, Director of Utilities
John Bock and Jim Veryser of the
Englewood Utilities Department
1. MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 8, 2002 MEETING.
The Englewood Water and Sewer Board approved the minutes from the October 8, 2002
meeting.
Mr. Higday moved:
Mr .. Kasson seconded:
Ayes:
Nays:
Members absent:
Motion carried.
To approve the minutes from the October 8,
2002 Englewood Water and Sewer Board
Meeting.
Clark, Higday, Cassidy, Kasson, Habinecht
None
Wolosyn, Moore, Otis, Bradshaw
2. 4663 S. MARIPOSA ST -LICENSE AGREEMENT & CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT .
The Board received a License Agreement and Grant of Construction Easement from
Robert Schwinn for crossing the City's right-of-way over the City Ditch for installing a
water line to the residence at 4663 S. Mariposa Dr. Englewood's City Attorney and the
Utilities Engineer have reviewed and approved the agreements.
Mr. Higday moved;
Mr. Cassidy seconded:
Ayes:
Nays:
Members absent:
Motion carried .
Bev Bradshaw entered at 5 : 10 p.m.
To approve the License Agreement and
Construction Easement to install a water line
over the City Ditch to the residence at 4663
S. Mariposa St.
Clark, Higday, Cassidy, Kasson, Habinecht
None
Wolosyn, Moore, Otis, Bradshaw
3. ENGLEWOOD HERALD ARTICLE DATED SEPTEMBER 11, 2002
REGARDING SEWER RA TE INCREASE.
The Board received a copy of the September 11, 2002 Englewood Herald article , "Four
residents oppose sewer fee rate increase." This is an information-only item. Council will
be voting on the second and final reading for the sewer rate increase at their October 21,
2002 meeting.
4. AW ARD OF EXCELLENCE .
The Board received a copy of the American Water Works Association Award of
Excellence given to the management and employees of the City of Englewood Utilities
Department.
5. SLUDGE HANDLING SYSTEM FOR THE ALLEN PLANT RESERVOIR.
The existing sludge handling system was purchased in 1991 and has been used
continually. The existing barge requires continuous repairs, resulting in downtime that is
detrimental to sludge production. The Allen Water Filter Plant produces sludge year-
round, and it is imperative that the sludge be processed when th e weather is amenable.
When the schedule for removing sludge is delayed for repairs, it limits the volume in the
sludge reservoir and the opportunity for removing it. The projected life span for this type
of machine is 10 years. A bid opening was held on October 8, with the low, acceptable
bidder being Crisifulli at $84,971.
Mr. Habenicht moved;
Mr. Cassidy seconded:
Ayes:
Nays:
Members absent:
Motion carried.
6. FIRE HYDRANT USE.
To recommend Council approval of the bid
from Crusifulli, Inc. in the amount of
$84,971 for a sludge handling system for the
Allen Filter Plant Reservoir.
Clark, Higday, Cassidy, Kasson, Habinecht,
Bradshaw
None
W olosyn, Moore, Otis
John Bock and Jim Veryser appeared before the Board to discuss the existing policy for
fire hydrant use. It was noted that various contractors and agencies use fire hydrants for
an indefinite basis for mobile car washing, watering golf greens and landscape
maintenance. It is being questioned if the Utilities Department should continue to issue
these fire hydrant permits.
Some Board recommendations were; having the same policy as the Denver Water
Department (which is a $1 ,000 non-refundable permit and billing water at $3.60/1 ,000
gallons); grandfathering in existing accounts, excluding Englewood Public Schools;
revising the existing ordinance to distinguish between privat e entities, municipalities and
schools and making it more practical for the business to purchase an actual tap. Ms.
Bradshaw requested that the options be listed and outlined at a future meeting.
7. CENTENNIAL/ENGLEWOOD WATER AGREEMENT
Stu distributed copies of the proposed Water Supply and Facilities Agreement between
Englewood and Centennial Water and Sanitation District. The agreement was given to
the Board for initial review and will be discussed in detail with David Hill and Joe Tom
Wood at the Board's January meeting.
The meeting adjourned at 5:50 p.m.
The next Water and Sewer Board meeting will be Tuesday, December 10, 2002 at the
County Line Barbeque Restaurant.
Respectfully submitted,
Cathy Burrage
Recording Secretary
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Date Agenda Item
December 2, 2002
Subject
City Ditch License
Agreement and Grant of
Temp. Bridge Construction
Easement with K. C. Ensor
Jr., Trustee and the Littleton
Large Animal Clinic
(WildAcres, LLC)
INITIATED BY
Utilities Department
STAFF SOURCE
Stewart Fonda, Director of Utilities
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
None
RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Englewood Utilities Department recommends Council approval by ordinance of the City
Ditch License Agreement and Construction Easement with K. C . Ensor, Jr. and the Large
Animal Clinic (WildAcres, LLC).
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
Ensor Properties and the Littleton Large Animal Clinic have submitted a License Agreement
and Construction Easement for crossing Englewood's City Ditch with an access road. The
Colorado Department of Transportation (COOT) is widening San ta Fe along the City Ditch Fe
from County Line Road to Prince Street. This section is being widened to allow construction of
separating medians and additional lanes to improve traffic safety.
The Li censee expressly assumes full and strict liability for any and all damages of every nature
to person or property caused by the point or points where the Licensee performs any work in
connection with the crossing provided by the Licensee. The City reserves the right to make
full use of the property necessary in the operation of the City Ditch . The City retains all rights
to operate, maintain , install, repair, remove or relocated any of its ' facilities located within the
City's right-of-way.
Englewood's City Attorney and the Utilities Engineer have reviewed and approved the License
Agreement and Construction Agreement submitted by Ensor and the Littleton Large Animal
Clinic.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
None .
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Ordinance
License Agreement and Construction Agreement
GRANT OF TEMPORARY BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
THIS GRANT OF A BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ("this Grant") is made this
__ day of , 2002 by WILDACRE, LLC, whose principal place of
business is 8025 South Santa Fe Drive, Littleton, CO 80120, and KEN ENSOR, ET AL,
whose principal place of business is 7951 South Santa Fe Drive, Littleton, CO 80120,
(Grantees), and the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO ("Englewood"), whose address is
1000 Englewood Parkway, Englewood, Colorado 80110.
WHEREAS, WILDACRE, LLC desires to construct a bridge and associated
roadway across the City Ditch right-of-way to upgrade the access to Grantee's property .
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES COVENANT AND AGREE AS
FOLLOWS :
1. Description of Project. The City of Englewood agrees to permit Grantees , in
conjunction with the construction and improvements to the crossing of the City
Ditch to construct a bridge and associated roadway as described on Exhibit "A"
attached hereto within the City 's right of way. Grantees further agree to comply
with all state and federal statutes and regulations regarding the handling, storage
and clean-up of any hazardous materials used by Grantees , their employees , agents
and assigns in conjunction with the Project. The location of the construction
easement is as found on Exhibit "A".
2 . Length of Agreement. This Agreement shall expire on April 1, 2003 , except for
seeding, which will be completed by July 1, 2003.
3 . Access. Grantees shall have the temporary non-exclusive right to enter the
property for any reasonable purpose necessary for the construction of the
Project subject to the following restrictions: 1) normal working hours shall be
consistent with the South Santa Fe CDOT project scheduled .
4 . Restoration. Grantees will do what is necessary to restore the property to its
original condition including but not limited to: tree and shrubbery replacement.
5 . Site Condition. Grantees will provide for security and safety of the public at the
site at all times . The construction of the bridge shall comply with the drawings
and specifications as described in Exhibit A.
6. Liability . Grantees agree that they shall be responsible for its own negligent acts
on the property.
7. Rights of Grantor. Gran tor reserves the full right to the undisturbed ownership,
use, and occupancy of the Easement Property insofar as said ownership , use, and
occupancy is consistent with and does not impair the rights granted to Grantee in
this Grant. In the event Grantor's improvements under the Easement require
repair, replacement or maintenance of any type or kind, Grantor may do so with
reasonable notice. Cost of repair and restoration of surface improvements shall
be done at the cost of the Grantee.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Grant of Temporary
Bridge Construction Easement the day and year first above written .
GRANTOR:
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
By -------------By -------------
A , Gray Clark, Chairman Englewood Stewart Fonda, Director of Utilities
Water and Sewer Board
ATTEST : ATTEST:
Cathy Burrage, Recording Secretary Loucrishia A . Ellis, City Clerk
GRANTEE:
WILDACRE, LLC
By:
President
STATE OF COLORADO )
) SS.
COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of
_________ , 200 _,. as President of Wildacre LLC .
My Commission expires:
Notary Public
GRANTEE:
ENSOR SIGNATURE LINES TO BE INSERTED HERE .
-2-
LICENSE AGREEMENT
THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the day of
~~~~~~~~~
, 2002, by and between the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , a municipal
corporation of the State of Colorado , herein referred to as "City'', and KEN ENSOR, ET .AL. and
WILDACRE LLC_, herein referred to as "Licensees''.
WITNESSETH: The City, without any warranty of its title or interest whatsoever,
hereby authorizes Licensee to maintain a parcel of land in the City 's rights-of-way for the City
Ditch, more specifically described as a parcel ofland situate in the SW 1/4 of Section 32,
Township SS , Range 68W of the 6th P .M., County of Arapahoe , State of Colorado , and lying
within the described lines shown on Exhibit A attached hereto.
1. Licensees are granted an exclusive license to the parcel described herein subject to
the provisions of this Agreement. In addition , Licensee is granted the following
rights , subject to all provisions contained in this License Agreement:
a. To construct and maintain a bridge across the City Ditch right-of-way so
long as the structures and water flow of the City Ditch are not impaired.
2. In granting this License , the City reserves the right to make full use of the parcel as
may be necessary or convenient in the operation of the City and the City retains all
right to operate , maintain, install, repair, remove or relocate any of the City 's
facilities located within the City Ditch or City right-of-way at any time and in such
manner as it deems neces sary or convenient. In the event Licensees ' installations
should interfere with the City's use or operation of the City Ditch or right-of-way , at
any time hereafter, Licensees shall , upon request by the City and at Licensees' sole
expense , immediately relocate , rearrange or remove its installation so as not to
interfere with any such City use and to remo ve the installation of Licensees when
necess ary or convenient for the City, its successors and assign s.
3 . Subject to the provisions contained in paragraph 2 , the City shall have the right to
maintain , install, repair, remove or relocate the City Ditch or any other of its facilities
or installations within the City 's right-of-way , at any time and in such manner as the
City deems necessary or convenient. The City reserves the exclusive right to control
all easements and install ations.
4. The rights and privileges granted in this License shall be subject to prior agreements ,
licenses and/or grants , recorded or unrecorded, and it shall be the Licensees ' sole
responsibility to determine the existence of said agreements, licenses or grants or
conflicting uses or installations.
5 . The Licens ees shall have the right to maintain the above described parcel , including,
but not limited to , planting and trimming grass and/or bushes , fertilization and
irrigation and removal of trash and brush .
6 . Licensees must maintain access to the parcel by City personnel for inspection and
maintenance.
written.
7. No construction, other than the proposed bridge and roadway, shall be allowed on
this parcel without express written permission from the City.
8. Upon abandonment of any right or privilege herein granted, the right of Licensees to
that extent shall terminate, but their obligation to indemnify and save harmless the
City, its officers and employees, shall not terminate in any event.
9. The rights granted Licensees hereunder may no be assigned without the written
consent of the City.
10 . Licensees shall comply with all applicable laws and ordinances and all rules,
regulations and requirements of any environmental standards and conditions
applicable to the City ditch or City right-of-way. If, as a result of the Licensees'
occupancy of the premises and its operation hereunder, any such law, ordinance, rule
or regulation is violated, Licensees shall protect, save harmless, defend and
indemnify the city from and against any penalties , fines , costs and expenses,
including legal fees and court costs incurred by the City , caused by , resulting from or
connected with such violation or violations , and this License shall terminate
immediately .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , this instrument has been executed day and year first above
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
Acting by and through its
Water and Sewer Board
Chairman
APPROVED:
Stewart Fonda, Director
LICENSEE:
President, Wildacre, LLC
STATE OF COLORADO )
) SS.
COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE )
On this __ day of , 2002, before me personally appeared
Licensees .
Notary Public
Witness my hand and official seal
My Commission expires ______ _
LICENSEE:
INSERT ENSOR SIGNATURE BLOCKS HERE
--~ ..... --.--.~ ~~-7..::.-=.~,--=~::-"' ~-";" -.-,-,-.;:;-=-:."?~-.·,.;:.;,-,-":'_.;_......_ __ :--=~"'---·-'-··"""':'~."":'-·~----~""'-' ··"'-
-··--·----·------.. ·-----.. ----·.'::'~,... .... .._ ... _,.-:"'·'!'~;.~·-=--::---7":.o..T:----;!'·:·-,.,. ''"'.:..~·c :· .~-=:.· .. _-......... "-· ~--.. ~. :-~-.,.,.~-~~-'-u...:;-;:~~~~~~~~c~-~-~"*;::r ;::=·:=~--5"-_~~~~-; .• :-.• .:....:.. • ....-:-.·
_.....__ __ ----------. -....-----___ ...__·----~-·------·-----_....:_;:_;:_ __ .__~_. __ -:__-.-.·-·_::.__~--...:. ----~-------..:::_;..:.·-.--~ --~.;;~...:. ---. ·:·
,._
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Extra!
Fiie of the Northern Oteyenne
LONG ROAD HOME
Seil-BenNiahthon>e
Cmnpbelljolned other
Oleyenne 1ndians in Montana
Sunday for a cuemony to bury
someofhls grandf1tlher's
remalns.6A
TbeClter911RK
• Migiated from wel>lem
Great Ll:lkesrel(ton 111 the 171 h
ccnuuy and .settled in North
Wld SouU1 Dakota-
• By 19tl1centwymoved to
Ul.e O real Plains t.o hw•l for
bulfalo.
•In the 1830s split.into
Northern and Southern
group.
• In 1864, the Northern
Cheyeru1e were given a
~etvatlon lneaslem
Montana.
lmporblltcere.O'llllSI
• The Sw1 Dance i& a religious
ceremony thut t:t!lebrales the
power or lhe sun 8.rld seeks to
renew the ea1th's resources_ Il
hi s ts 8 da,ys_
• 'l11e Anow Renewul
Qre mon ... v Is anot.he1· major
event. ll is mei.nl to r e new the
spiritual power ofU1e tribe
8.rld bring them into hlillTluny.
It&:$ to be held on the longe::;t
TONIA TWICHELL, CITY EDITOR, lO!LU2 .5201 , E -MAIL : MKTRO¥j'ROCKYMOUNTAINNEWS -C~M
A war abOut water
Farmers battle cities
for rights to scarce ·
South Platte supply
B)·Jen)S..itb
flOCKY IAOUNTAIH l.!f\\'S
High on the third tloor of O~
le~"s htslorlc courthoutre, a water
battle Js being fought that could
change theCaceofFronlRange agri-
culture and slgnlflcanUy alter state
authortly.
This bitter confrontation centers
on the South Platte River, and pits
fanners &g'ainst cities and against
one another.
Colorado's ability to e.dminJst~r
critical underground irrigation wa-
tes also ls being challenged. 'fhe
Jlght ls In "unprecedtmled legal no
man's land: sald one water manag-
e1· •.
At issue la whether an estimated
4.000 lrrlgaUon well:s Lo northew.1.-
ern Colorado tannle.nds -wells
tbat pump enoug11 water moi;t :swn-
mera to supPl,y Denver for one year
-should continue to operate.
Those opposed to the wells sas
the filnners have pumped loo much
water from underground .&upplles
for years, gradually depleting the
South Platte's own undergi"OU.nd
sources. PowerfUI ungaUon comps-
nies and some cities who relY on the
river want the practice stopped or
slgulQcanU,y reduced.
Beyond the legalities, there Is a
simple truth at work hens, obsecvers
say. Q>l.orado's once plentiful 1,11ater
.supplies have been absorbed by
growth-I .2 mtillon people have ar-
rtvc:d here In the past decade alone.
Sllould fa11•• p awayl
"The&e d~ It aeeIDB as If we in
Q>lo.rado have a quart of water and
what we really need ls a gallon,• said
Skylar Loetner, who with Iler hus-
band farms 1,000 acres out.side La
Salle.
MJ understand the clUes' view-
point, but we flil"ffiers have been
here a longtime. DoUleyreatlywant
us to go away? Do they really want
these open spaces to be oovered by
houses? We've all got to figure out u
w~ to work this out .• ·
The cwTent drought has brought
the ls.sue to a crllil& poinl, ellminlll-
iug the precious liquid surpluses
that, unlil this year, allowed well us-
ers,, river usera and clUes to peacd\11-
1.Y coe.xht.
When the controvel':iY tu-st Oared
during the swnmer, state engineer
Hal Simpson, Colorado's top water
cop, 1lercel.Y defended the f1UnJers
and their water use . Whether he'll
win lhJs flghl tn oourt. l.8u't clear. Sim -
pson did not return calls seeking
flip to WATER on lOA
The issue:
Wheltler pufTlliflg from an
estimated 4,000 higatioo
wellsoo1iortheas\emCQ!orado
I arm lands should be slopped
ur reduced because of the
effectoo\he Solih Platte Ril.'llr .
What's at stake:
• FrontRangecitiescouldbeforcedt.ogive1.4>
some of theirwates-.-omthe Solih Platte River
to ensu-e SefliOr w~l!I' users ti ave enougt-..
a farmers i11 northeastern Colorado fear\h(
waler court Vlltlforcethem '°puflll less<lf b
more waa-ki r~llmish the rillef'.
Train crash victim'~
condition upgrade.
!5 ·c:::::
I ,_.
en . I
I N
I c::>
'Cl
N
:::l:
I~ N
Ul
~
-0 ::x
o::J
tT1 -::U
Q
= -r-r-
Q
~
tT1 :.z: r-
ITI
~
~
Ul
0
....,
~
~
(.I.)
c:>
(.I.)
~
Cl
N -0)
'"""'
::t>
-\
:-\
(_ l
..... ~~?"-·~r:-: ~....., ........ -.··::.~!!~~~~~~-:-i ~ ... ~--: ~..:~---. ~ .. ·~~~~~':"!'r----.--: -f.:':== :'-:-·~-· •. ·~~-~·.,..; · °" .. --· ;-·-----_·.:.:.--·.-A:.:.:.:.::.---=-.:.;.=..:.. _ __..:· ___ µ-_: · .. -·---·· _ __._ _______ . ; ___ ·-·--·· ..... _,_.__:_..,._.,......._
•. 1 1·c ·:.11 1' · .. :, .• H ..
lOA RAxk)' Meunc~ Ne"" ;. • \ • -~ •! • t :: I ~ • ~ "' ~· •: • • · . ~~.. . ., .,. .. .
Water: Settlement
talks fail to resolve issue
Continued from 4A
cornnu:nt..
Behlnd-lhe-scenes settlement
t~. led by Oolorudo Ag1iculture
Couuni.ss.loner Don Ament., have
fail ed to rnsolve the imJJussc , sout·c -
es said . Ament al:io did 11ot r'Ct.ucn
phone calls.
"'We're in W1 unprece<lenled legul
110 mu11·s land," lUlitl Tom Cech ,
who heads the Central Colorado
Water Conservancy Dhit.rtct in
Greeley. "We're all trying to guess
what's going to happen."
In this bat.Lie, several Front
Range cities, including Denver,
Boulder, Highlands Ranch, Thum-_
um and En"1.ewood, have jolued
force.is with power1W w11ter user:i
wbo rezy on the South Platte River,
uot wells, to inigate 1.-helr fauns .
Under Colorado law, watec rights
arc assigned on 1:1 nest-come,
fin>\.-served basis . River users who
anived t1r.st, some datlng back t.o
the early 186~. ha\•e Uae most se-
nior water rights, and are entitled
to n~ceive t.helr water before any-
one else, regardless of where
they're located on the river.
Cities could I09e ...,plies
Front Range cities oAen U6t!
more junior water rights to tUl their
storage rezservolrs. So they could be
forced lo giw up their watet· to en·
sure senior waler users down-
stream have enough-
'I11e.t has created the odd-couple
relaUonsh.11> between Uw upst.-eam
cities aml such downstream enll -
1.ies as the Fort Moa-gan Inlgallon
and DU.ch Co. to challenge t.he well
pumping Lhat occurs In between
the two.
Prut orthe problem, expert:s say,
is that 110 one !mew well pumping
drained 1iver supp lie:> until the late
1960s, when hydroloKlsts discov -
ered the link.
Betbre Ut.ai, tile atat.e encour-
---
•Goto
RockyMol8'la&nNewLc:om
for ard1i\~!d slm i t'ti ahoul
Colorado's WO:l diought.
aged well d.Jilllng .
"In lhe meantime. the ecunotnles
of whole fann wnununlttes have be-
come depende.nt on well~lcrlgated
tanning,~ said Assistant Attorney
General Steve 8111)3 . ''We can't.Just
wipe It out..~
WeB opponents aren't suggesting
the !anns be drled up . But lhey
want the well program changed to
allow lhe water cowt. not sh1te om-
clals, to delennlne how much water
Is pumped and how much extra wa-
ler the well fanners must supplY to
replenish I.he Sout.h Platte.
"We want everybody lo pl!\Y by
the 1mme ntles," sllld John Akolt.,
who 1·epreBents u,e Fanners Reser-
voir and lnigation Co. In Brighton.
It, too, owns irrigation wells, but
they've been appro\'ed by the waler
court.
.. We spent $600,000 on our well
augmentaUon pl.an/ Akolt sllid_
"We have to replenish every drop
we use_ Evecyone else should, too_"
Welll never certllied
Farmers whose well use has nev-
er been certi11ed by t.he water oowt
are deepl,y wonted_ 1'hey fear the
court will rorce lbem to pump less
or buy more water on U\e open mar-
ket to 1·eplenlsh the l'iver.
Until now, l'llnners have relied on
groups such as the Ornundwalea-
Approprtators oft.he South Platte,
or OASP, to le11se w1tter each sea-
son to replenish the river for them.
GASP ts n::>ponslble for about
3,000 wells_ Even before the
drougJlt, ll:i leased water vo,•aa gradu-
ally belng purchased by fOBt-grow -
S lt'o'C'POUl$0i&/Sr£C.,,t fO I llC IP.A'S
Weld County fannen SlcYlar, lefi, and Larry Loeftler, shown here
with their son, Wyatt, 3, will find out next year ift.he slate will shut off their
.water well.
ing cltlts and lndustrilll users.
Thooe short supplies li11ve libnmk
even further during the drought.
To find ~rm anent walel· sOUJ-ce&
to replen.l.sh the SouU\ Platte w1U be
ahnosl lmpos.slble, experu s11ltl_
Watw ltrinp lep dollar
ie:J ltl'l!n't swayed by that argument_
Tbey believe more water can be
found, and if it's not, well-depen-
dent rwms should be torced to
pumpJesstoprotectt-hertver.
"Maybe they will have l<> pwnp
leas,• said Veronica Sperling, a wa-
ter attorney represenUng Boulder
"The entln1 metropolltan Front and Highlunds Ranch. "But why
Range i& competinlf rm· water now. not.?
Cities are paying top dollar for any -"All thlB year there ll.'ere t'Brmers
wat et' they can-ftnd, • Bald water at-with senior water rights on the river
t.omey David Robbi.us, who repre-who lrrlgated less because there
sent3 OASP. "How cC>Uld these was no water In the rlvu Why
f'llrmers go out lllld compete · agalnst -Thonitttn and Aurora for shouldn't.welluser.sc11tback?They
new water? It's not possible. There Wllllt ll .special deal A>r the:maelves_"
isn't enough money _ And even It Water Oomt Judge Jonathan
there v.oere money there isn't Uays Is expected to rule by Dec. 20
enough water_" ' onwhetherthe8tate~theauU1or-
The Central Colorado District It~· l<> approve well operaUons e.11d
which provides augmentaUon wa~ whether the state'B plan for ad min-
ter tor about 1,500 welJB, has a per-tsterlnl{ the wells should move fur-
manent $50 million po1tfollo of wa-ww·cl .
ter rlghls . Bul Central. which CIUl Regan.iless of who wk121, t.he case
levy taxes to purcha:>c water, suys will almost certfiln\y be appealed to
even those rtghts don't provide lhe Oolorado Supreme Oourt.
enoughwaterformemberwells. Mlt'B a Jump ball," BaYB &isistant
wwe would be tttlk.lng about hun-Attorney General Bbm. "lf U1e
· dreda of milllons of dollars to Ond judge rules against Uli, lliwmakers
enough permanent suppll~ ror liU are go.Ing to have to act .. "
the wells, even If they were avail-
able, w Cech said. rmUllJ@Rock.JIMounlab1NeioJ.co1n
But dltch wmpanles and the cit-or(30JJl9Z-5474.
•. t:..'.-.:...~
. :·:,. :-j' • ;: .. • ~ ... j I
MONDAY, NO\'F.liBBR ll
Train: Pare1i~
have questio ~
about crossi1 ~
C> :z:
Continued Iman 4A N
pickup truck, tried UJUiucce --
to pwh t..'lliureen 's car lhrou 8=J
cro~siag_ -o
But the train struck the re1 3:
s.engerdoor and pushed U1e c t:o
a wncrete guard call adjacent ~
tracks o
"I g1ve Vinny lOD pen:ent fm =
what he trled w do." M.art!J ;:::
"What milk.es me angry ls the. r-
a high-tech algnal at that c:rt o
There is no room tor error. : ~
body ln town has .had to b~k ~
tracksatthat.crossln~.· r-
Maattnalsoquest.ioned WhY a: ~
ty coal tl'B.in bad to be gulng tt "Tl
Castle Rock at e time when eo& ;::o
ers are gotng to work and 2.~• ~
denl:iaret.l}'ingtogettoschool 0
"Wlly then? And why go tb
town a14<> mph?" Mnrtin s!W
are looking for aome an1>we1 ';;J
W11.Dt someUdng done abou :x:
crossing.• ::z:
The Martins and Sheldon 9
they would at.tend a Cwil!e u..>
toWll coWlell meeting tonlgh C)
will take up the issue of the ere ~
BuL the most important qu ~
rorthefamllyrl&htnowl&Mau ,_.
health.. ~
"We don't know when st ,_.
wake up or how she wW be, w I
said. ~Bhe ma.>• need months c
yeara ol rehabllitaUon. Bt
strength will somehow ge
through. That and the lo\le an
port of her family and friends.'
~don't knowwh :u
she will wake up 01 8
how she will be. "
D.wt Martin, Mauret.>J1's fc
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Project No. 6628A.10 and
6628A.20
This AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of December, 2002, by and
between the City of Englewood, (hereinafter "OWNER"), and Carollo Engineers, A Professional
Corporation, (hereinafter "ENGINEER").
WITNESS ETH:
WHEREAS , the OWNER and the ENGINEER wish to enter into an Agreement (hereinafter
"Agreement") for the furnishing of Engineering Services in connection with
City of Englewood aqua ammonia storage at the Allen WTP and PAC storage and feed at the
Union Avenue Pump Station
(Owner and Project Description)
(hereinafter "Project"), and
WHEREAS, ENGINEER is qualified and prepared to perform the necessary professional
services in connection with the Project.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants of the parties
hereto, it is agreed as follows:
SECTION 1 -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1.1 ENGINEER shall provide professional
eng ineering services in all phases of
the Project to which this Agreement
applies. The services furnished by the
ENGINEER will be defined by Task
Order No. 1, and if required, by
supplemental Task Orders all of which
will set forth the Engineer's Services,
Time of Performance, and Payment.
1.2 All changes in the scope of
prof essional services to be performed
by the ENGINEER, in the
responsibilities of the OWNER, and in
the amount of payment to the
ENGINEER shall be authorized by an
executed Task Order. It is intended
that each Task Order, after execution
by both parties shall become a
supplement to and a part of this
Agreement.
H:\Client\Englewood _DEN\Contracts\Agreement1102.doc
SECTION 2 -PAYMENT TO ENGINEER
2.1 As consideration for providing the
services referred to in Section 1, the
OWNER shall pay ENGINEER on the
basis established in Task Order No. 1
and any supplemental Task Orders for
Services.
2.2 The ENGINEER is not responsible for
damage or delay in performance
caused by events beyond the control
of ENGINEER. In the event
ENGINEER's services are
suspended, delayed or interrupted for
the convenience of the OWNER or
delays occur beyond the control of
ENGINEER, an equitable adjustment
in ENGINEER's time of performance
and cost of ENGINEER's personnel
and subcontractors shall be made.
2.3 OWNER reserves the right to direct
revision of ENGINEER's services as
Page 1 of 6
may be necessary. When ENGINEER
is directed to make revisions under
this section of the agreement,
ENGINEER shall advise OWNER of
the probable costs involved in
completing engineering services and
the time of performance for such
completion .
2.4 In the event OWNER and ENGINEER
cannot agree on equitable
compensation for services rendered in
making revisions, then, at OWNER's
option, ENGINEER shall either
continue performance under the
revised Agreement and an equitable
adjustment in ENGINEER's time of
performance and cost of ENGINEER's
personnel shall be made at
completion of the revised work or
ENGINEER shall not be obligated to
continue performance under this
Agreement.
2.5 If revisions of the final plans and
specifications are required by reasons
of ENGINEER's error or omission,
then, in that event, OWNER's
exclusive remedy for such errors and
om issions will be limited to rev isions
made by ENGINEER without
additional compensation.
2.6 The ENGINEER shall bill the OWNER
monthly indicating the services
performed and the cost of such
services.
OWNER agrees to pay invoices within
45 days of their date. Payments not
received by ENGINEER within 45
days shall be considered delinquent
and subject to a finance charge of
1 percent per month for each month
unpaid after the date of invoice .
ENGINEER may suspend services
should an invoice remain delinquent
for 75 days from date of invoice.
2. 7 All notices shall be made in writing
an d may be given by personal delivery
H:\Client\Englewood_DEN\Contracts\Agreement1102 .doc
or by mail. Notices sent by mail shall
be addressed to the designated
responsible person or office:
TO OWNER:
William McCormick
Operations Superintendent
Englewood Utilities Department
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, CO 8011 O
TO ENGINEER:
Carl P. Houck
Carollo Engineers , P.C.
380 lnterlocken Crescent, Suite 780
Broomfield , CO 80021
and when so addressed, shall be
deemed given upon deposit in the
United States Mail, postage prepaid.
In all other instances, notices and
invoices shall be deemed given at the
time of actual delivery.
All payments are to be mailed to:
Carollo Engineers, P.C.
P.O. Box 53511
Phoenix , AZ 85072-3511
unless otherwise informed on the face
of the invoice.
SECTION 3 -MISCELLANEOUS
3.1 The OWNER shall furnish the
ENGINEER available studies,
drawings , specifications, reports and
other data pertinent to ENGINEER's
services; obtain or authorize
ENGINEER to obtain or provide
additional reports and data as
required; furnish to ENGINEER
services of others required for the
performance of ENGINEER's services
hereunder, and ENGINEER shall be
Page 2 of 6
entitled to use and rely upon all such SECTION 4 -LEGAL RELATIONS
information and services provided by
OWNER or others in performing 4.1 The ENGINEER shall be responsible
ENGINEER's services under this for professional negligence which is
Agreement. the exercise of skill and ability as
ordinarily required of engineers under
3.2 The OWNER shall arrange for access the same or similar circumstances.
to and make all provisions for The ENGINEER shall not be
ENG INEER to enter upon public and responsible for warranties,
private property as required for guarantees, fitness for a particular
ENG I NEER to perform services purpose or breach of fiduciary duty
hereunder. and shall only indemnify for failure to
perform in accordance with the
3 .3 Documents, including drawings and generally accepted engineering and
spe ci fications , prepared by consulting standards .
ENGINEER pursuant to this
Agreement are property of the 4 .2 ENGINEER agrees to indemnify and
OWNER but are not intended or hold ha r mless , at its expense ,
represented to be suitable for reuse OWNER and its directors , officers and
by OWNER or others for this Project employees from and against claims ,
or on any other project. Any reuse of loss , liability and damages to which
completed documents or use of they or any of them may be put or
partially completed documents without subjected to arising out of or resulting
written verification or concurrence by from the performance of this
ENGINEER for the specific purpose Agreement , which claim, damage,
intended will be at OWNER's so le risk loss or expense is caused by the
and without liability or legal exposure negligent acts, errors or omissions of
to ENGINEER. ENGINEER in the performance of its
services; provided , however, that
3.4 The ENGINEER maintains , at its own ENGINEER's liability under this
expense, Worker's Compensation and subparagraph shall not result from or
Employers Liability, Comprehensive be attributable to:
General Liability, Automobile Liability
and Professional Liability policies with a. The negligence, conduct or lawful
limits at or above that which is responsibility of the OWNER, its
reasonably required of other directors, officers, employees,
eng ineering firms and will , upon contractors or subcontractors and
request , furnish insurance certificates all workmen and persons
to OWNER. employed by them or otherwise
under their control, or
3.5 A project notebook, containing all
calculations used to complete the b. Improvements to the project
Proj ect, shall be maintained during the (betterment) which are the lawful
course of the project. One (1) copy of responsibility of OWNER, whether
the notebook shall be furnished by or not engineering related.
ENGINEER to the OWNER at the 4.3 Hazardous materials or asbestos may completion of the project. exist at a site where there is no
reason to believe they could or should
be present. The ENGINEER and
OWNER agree that the discovery of
H:\Client\Englewood _ DEN\C ontracts\Agreement1102.doc Page 3 of 6
unanticipated hazardous materials or
asbestos constitutes a changed
condit ion mandating a renegotiation of
ENGINEER's services .
4.4 The ENGINEER has no control over
the cost of labor, materials , equipment
or services furnished by others , or
over Contractor's methods of
determining prices, or other
competit ive bidding or market
cond itions, practices or bidding
strategies. Cost estimates are based
on ENGINEER's opinion based on
experience and j udgment. ENG INEER
cannot and does not guarantee that
proposals , bids or actual Project
construction costs will not vary from
cost estimates prepared by
ENG INEER.
4 .5 If the project involves construct ion of
any kind , the parties agree that
OWNER and ENGINEER shall be
indemnified to the fullest extent
permitted by law for all claims ,
damages , losses and expense
including attorney's fees aris ing out of
or resulting from Contractor's
performance of work including injury
to any worker on the j ob site except
for the sole negligence of OWNER or
ENGINEER. Both OWNER and
ENGINEER shall be named as
additional primary insured(s) by
Contractor's General Liability and
Builders All Risk insurance policies
without offset and all Construction
Documents and insurance cert ificates
shall include wording acceptable to
the parties herein with reference to
such provisions.
4 .6 ENGINEER shall not be respons ible
for the means , methods, techniques,
sequences , or procedures of
construction selected by contractors
or the safety precautions and
programs incident to the work of
contractors and will not be responsible
for Contractor's failure to carry out
H:\Client\Englewood _ DEN\Contracts\Agreem ent 1102.doc
work in accordance with the Contract
Documents.
4. 7 The services to be performed by
ENGINEER are intended solely for the
benefit of the OWNER. No person or
entity not a signatory to this
Agreement shall be entitled to rely on
the ENGINEER's performance of its
services hereunder, and no right to
assert a cla im against the ENGINEER
by ass ignment of indemnity rights or
otherwise sh all accrue to a third party
as a result of this Agreement or the
performance of the ENGINEER's
services hereunder.
4.8 The ENGINEER's instruments of
service hereunder are the printed hard
copy drawings and specifications
issued for the Project , whereas
electronic media , including CADD
files , are tools for their preparation. As
a convenience to the OWNER, the
ENGINEER shall furnish to the
OWNER both printed hard copies and
electronic media . In the event of a
conflict in their content , the printed
hard copies shall take precedence
over the electronic media.
Because data stored in electronic
media form can be altered ,
inadvertently, it is agreed that the
OWNER shall hold ENGINEER
harmless from liability arising out of
changes or modifications to
ENGINEER's data in electronic media
form in the OWNER's possession or
released to others by the OWNER.
SECTION 5 -TERMINATION OF
AGREEMENT
5.1 Th is Agreement may be terminated in
whole or in part in writing by either
party in the event of substantial failure
by the other party to fulfill its
obligations under this Agreement
through no fault of the terminating
party; providing that no such
Page 4 of 6
termination may be effected unless
the other party is given ( 1 ) not less
than fifteen (15) calendar days wr itten
notice (delivered by certified mail,
return receipt requested) of intent to
term i nate, and (2) an opportunity for
consultation with the terminating party
prior to termination .
5.2 If this Agreement is terminated in
whole or in part by the OWNER for
reasons of default by the ENGINEER
a negotiated adjustment in the price
provided for in this Agreement shall
be made, however, no amount shall
be allowed for anticipated profit o r
unperformed services. If termination
for default is effected by the
ENGINEER the negotiated adjustment
shall include a reasonable profit. The
equitable adjustment for any
termination shall provide payment to
the ENGINEER for services rendered
and expenses incurred prior to the
termination, in addition to termination
settlement costs reasonably incurred
by the ENGINEER relating to
obligations and commitments as a
result of entering into this Agreement.
SECTION 6 -ENTIRE AGREEMENT
6.1 This Agreement, including
attachments incorporated herein by
reference, represents the entire
Agreement and understanding
between the parties and any
negotiations, proposals or oral
agreements are intended to be
integrated herein and to be
superseded by this written
Agreement. Any supplement or
amendment to this Agreement to be
effective shall be in writing and signed
by the OWNER and ENGINEER.
SECTION 7 -GOVERNING LAW
7 .1 This Agreement is to be governed by
and construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of Colorado.
H:\Client\Englewood_DEN\Contracts\Agreement1102.doc
(the remainder of this page is left intentionally blank)
Page 5 of 6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , duly authorized representatives of the parties have signed in
confirmation of this Agreement , with effective date the day and year first above written.
CAROLLO ENGINEERS ,
A Professi al Corporation
By :
By :
Jamel Demir , Partner
H:\Client\Englewood_DEN\Contracts\Agreement1 102.doc
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
Stewart H. Fonda
Director of Utilities
Page 6of6
TASK ORDER NO. 1
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
(OWNER)
AND
CAROLLO ENGINEERS, A Professional Corporation
(ENGINEER)
This Task Order is issued by the OWNER and accepted by ENGINEER pursuant to the mutual
promises, covenants and conditions contained in the Agreement between the above named
parties da t ed the day of December, 2002 , in connection with:
The City of Englewood aqua ammonia storage at the Allen WTP and PAC storage and feed at
the Union Avenue Pump Station .
(Project)
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Task Order is to: describe the general approach for improvements,
delineate t he tasks included in the Scope of Services, establish the time of performance and
describe payment for work associated with design and construction administration of permanent
aqua ammonia storage facility at the Allen WTP and a PAC storage and feed system at the
Union Avenue Pump Station. The project delivery will consist of a partnered approach based
upon sele ction of a qualified cont ractor at the 80% complete design stage.
T h e permanent aqua ammonia storage system will consist of rep lacing the temporary 500
gallon storage tank in the existing build ing with two 1000 to 1250 gallon storage tanks. The 500
gallon temporary storage tank shall remain property of the OWNER. The PAC feed system will
generally consist of a loading dock, PAC super sack storage area with cover, and PAC feed
building. The PAC feed building will include areas for electrical equipment, PAC mixing
equipment , and PAC feeding equipment. The PAC feed building will also include ancillary
support systems and electrical and instrumentation and control systems. Site paving and
g rading modifications and small diameter yard piping associated with the required modifications
is also included in this work.
ENGINEER'S SERVICES
T he Scope of Services, Time of Performance and Payment are based upon the following
general approach for improvements.
A. Aqua Ammonia Storage Improvements -Allen Water Treatment Plant
Design permanent storage for up to 2500 gallons of aqua ammon ia.
Task order is based on housing ammonia storage within the old chlorine ton cylinder storage
room . This room currently houses temporary storage for 500 gallons of aqua ammonia and a
H:\Cli ent\En gl ewood_DEN\C ontra cts\T01 .doc Page 1of5
cationic polymer feed system. Cationic polymer storage tote will be relocated to the
Pretreatment Building floor area adjacent to the rapid mix by OWNER's Utilities staff prior to
construction of the work under this Task Order.
Engineering design services include:
1. A limited structural investigation of the existing floor to confirm its design capacity.
2. Layout of ammonia storage tanks based on structural capacity of the existing floor. It is likely
that more than one tank will be required in order to distribute the weight of the ammonia and
storage vessels.
It is presently proposed to use air-tight fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) storage tanks that
can withstand an internal pressure of 2 psi, fitted with a vacuum/air release. Adequate
venting and scrubbing of the off-gasses will be provided through the air release.
In the event that the strength of the floor is not sufficient to support the desired volume of
aqua ammonia, the ENGINEER will discuss possible alternatives with the OWNER.
3. The OWNER's Utilities staff has already investigated building code requirements with the
OWNER's Building Department that may be associated with conversion of the existing room
to an ammonia storage room. Based on that review, it is presently assumed that no
modifications to construction of the room or its electrical and HVAC systems will be required
for the proposed use.
4. Investigation of the need for addition of a small cooling unit (e.g., a wall-mounted air
conditioner) for the room . Because of the concrete structure surrounding the space, extreme
interior temperatures during the summer have not been experienced and are not
anticipated.
5 . Design and specification of provisions to contain possible leaks from the tanks, and to
minimize the likelihood of leakage penetrating the floor of the room and entering the plant
electrical room below.
The purchase price for two, 1250-gallon FRP tanks is approximately $16,000. It is estimated
that the total installed costs of the ammonia storage facility is approximately $40,000.
B. PAC Unloading, Storage, and Feed Facilities -Union Avenue Pump Station
Locate facilities for unloading, storing and feeding PAC from "super sacks" in an area along the
east side of the existing roadway that accesses the pump station facilities.
Engineering design services include:
1. Improve access off Union Avenue by widening the entry turnout. This will require the
addition of fill in the depressed area between the entry road and t he existing storage
reservoir. Addition of this fill may require a small retaining wall, or re-sloping of the
southwest corner of the reservoir. Chemical delivery trucks will approach the site from the
east on Union Avenue , stop just west of the site access gate, and back up into the site. The
OWNER indicates that this practice is common and acceptable at adjacent industrial
H:\Client\Englewood _ DEN\C ontracts\T01 .d oc Page 2 of 5
facilities along Union Avenue.
2. PAC unloading facility. This is anticipated to be a dock structure, elevated above existing
grades at the site, to which chemical delivery trucks would back up. The dock structure will
be on the east side of the access roadway. A fork lift will be provided separately by the
OWNER that would travel up and down a ramp to the dock to unload the trucks. Grades at
the site and the need to minimize ramp lengths mean that trucks will probably not be parked
with the bed in a horizontal position during unloading. The OWNER indicates this is
acceptable.
3. PAC storage area. A concrete slab on grade with pre-eng ineered metal roof canopy (no
sidewalls) sized to handle storage of 45 super-sacks with fork lift access. Anticipated area to
store up to 45 supe r sacks is less than or equal to 2400 square feet. It is anticipated that the
foundation for the roof canopy will be footings bearing on existing soils. A curb will be
provided around the perimeter of the slab except in the area where loading and transfer
access by the fork lift will be required. The slab will be sloped to drain to the adjacent
sedimentation pond through openings in the curb. A storage area is to be provided with
visual isolation from passersby on Union Avenue by a privacy wall or fence.
4. PAC feed building. Approximately 500 square foot x 18-foot high masonry block building
detailed to coordinate with the appearance of the existing pump station. PAC feed building is
to be located adjacent to, but separate from the pump station, and to include areas for PAC
feeding from super sacks, PAC mixing and pumping, and elect rical controls. Foundation is
anticipated to be slab on grade and footings. A separate smaller electrical service will be
provided for this bu ilding, and conduits for instrumentation/control and light electrical service
will be routed back to the pump station. The necessary electrical , heating and ventilation
systems for the PAC feed building will be incorporated into the design. Water service will be
provided by pipes from the pump station, and drain piping will return to the pump station.
PAC will be fed in a slurry line from the feed building to the existing splitter box structure
located north of the pump station.
The PAC feeder the OWNER is currently leasing is a Norvac system, which is very similar to
the Norit system designed by the ENGINEER for Rawlins WY. The OWNER's chief concern
with the purchase of PAC equipment is that there be an easy, dust-free connection of the
super sack to the feeder. Both systems will be evaluated by the ENGINEER and the
appropriate manufacturer will be selected by the OWNER as part of the preliminary design.
Once the equipment has been selected, the ENGINEER will des ign and specify the
equipment and associated piping and controls.
Selection of PAC equipment.
a . Carollo will furnish draft procurement document to City (Bill McCormick), together with
names and addresses of two equipment suppliers (Norit and Norvac) who will be
requested to submit a bid. Bill will have appropriate C ity reviews performed. Any
modifications needed will be made by Carollo, and a final procurement document will
then be furnished to the City.
b. City's Purchasing office will send out request for bids to the two suppliers.
c. After review of the two bids received, City will enter into a contract to purchase the
equipment from one of the suppliers.
H:\Client\Englewood _DENIContractslT01.doc Page 3 of 5
d. In the contractor plans and specifications that Carollo will subsequently prepare, three
contractors , who will be requested to submit partnering proposals, will be told the
OWNER-furnished equipment they will be supplied to install on the project, and when it
will be delivered , and equipment supplier services that will also be furnished.
5. Landscaping will be provided by others.
The ENGINEER's preliminary estimate of t he cost of construction of the PAC system, as
described herein , is $450,000. The total anticipated construction cost for both aqua ammonia
and PAC improvements is $490,000.
The following tasks are included in the Scope of Services as presented in the attached
spreadsheet indicating anticipated effort and cost:
Task 1 -Kick-off Meeting. Describe project approach and discuss initial layout, equipment and
building selection with staff and determine design direction to be further developed in
preliminary design.
Task 2 -Preliminary Design . Develop general site layout, PAC equipment package selection,
major component sizing and materials , electrical feed , P&ID for instrumentation control , and
refine cost estimate and schedule , as necessary
Task 3 -Final Design Services. Prepare drawings and specifications to approximately the
80% complete stage for selection of a Contractor to construct both the aqua ammonia storage
and PAC facilities as one project. The number and content of the drawings is based on the
attached Anticipated Drawing List. Workshops/reviews will be held with the OWNER's staff as
appropriate. Eighty (80) percent complete plans and specifications will be submitted to CDPHE
for approval. It is assumed that the OWNER's Utilities Staff w ill be responsible for interfacing
with the Building Department, and that geotechnical and topographic survey information
regarding the existing sites will be made available to the ENGINEER.
Task 4 -QA/QC . Provide independent review of the des ign, drawings and specifications .
Task 5 -Contractor Selection Services. Identify three interested and qualified Contractors, as
approved by the OWNER, to perform the work. Prepare request for proposals from each
Contractor indicating proposed changes to the documents to more cost effectively meet the
OWNER's design intent, proposed st affing, subcontractors, equipment, construction schedule
and other pertinent information required to demonstrate an ability to properly perform the work
along with an estimated bid cost. Proposal cost will be estimated pending acceptance of any
contractor-suggested modifications to improve the project. Attend a pre-proposal meeting for
contractors , and answer questions during proposal preparation. Proposals will be reviewed and
evaluated and a recommendation for contract award will be made to the OWNER. After review
and approval by the OWNER's Water Board and Council, the ENG INEER will proceed to
administer the contract in a partnering manner on behalf of the OWNER including services
described in Task 6 .
Task 6 -Construction Phase Services. Provide part-time resident engineer services, based
on a construction period of six months. Perform the office administration and shop drawing
review according to the number of task items indicated in the attached Spreadsheet of
Anticipated Effort and Cost. Contractor will be required to keep up-to-date drawings of the
installations and to furnish as-built drawings when the project is comp lete.
H:\C lient\Englewood _ DEN \Contracts\TO 1.doc Page 4 of 5
TIME OF PERFORMANCE
ENGINEER will have 80% complete plans and specifications per Task 3 completed within 103
calendar days following Authorization of Task Order No. 1, ready to submit to contractors for
proposals and to CDPHE for approval.
PAYMENT
The work described above and in the Anticipated Drawing List and Spreadsheet of Anticipated
Effort and Cost will be performed for a lump sum payment of $127,200. ENGINEER will invoice
the OWNER monthly, based on Engineer's estimate of the percent complete of the work.
The lump sum payment indicated herein is based upon the time of performance stipulated in
this Task Order No. 1. Extensions of the time of performance may cause the ENGINEER'S cost
to increase. OWNER agrees to fairly negotiate with ENGINEER for reasonable additional costs
required to complete this work if the project is delayed beyond the stipulated schedule for
reasons outside of the control of the ENGINEER.
EFFECTIVE DATE
This Task Order No. 1 is effective as of the __ day of December, 2002 .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of the OWNER and of the
ENGINEER have executed this Task Order No. 1 evidencing its issuance by OWNER an d
acceptance by ENGINEER.
CAROLLO ENGINEERS,
A Professional Corporation
By:
By:
Jamel Demir, Partner
H:\Client\Englewood_OEN\Contracts\T01.doc
OWNER
Accepted this __ day of December, 2002
Stuart H. Fonda, Director of Uti lities
Page 5 of 5
City of Englewood
PAC and Ammonia Storage/Feed Systems
Anticipated Drawing List
ENG CAD Total
Drawing Sheet Description Hrs Hrs Hrs
1 G-01 Cover Sheet (w/ Drawing List, Design Criteria, Site Location) 8 8 16
2 G-02 Symbols and Abbreviations 8 8 16
3 G-03 Union Avenue Pump Station -Site Plan and Sections 54 33 87
4 T-01 Typical Details -Structural 8 8 16
5 T-02 Typical Detai ls -Structural 8 8 16
6 T-03 Typical Detai ls -Mechanical/Piping 8 8 16
7 PAC-1 PAC Building and Storage Pad -Plan 52 30 82
8 PAC-2 PAC Building and Storage Pad -Sections and Details 52 30 82
9 PAC-3 PAC Building and Storage Pad -Sections and Details 52 30 82
10 PAC-4 PAC Storage Canopy Plan & Details 40 20 60
11 ASA-1 Ammonia Storage Room -Plan and Sections 52 30 82
12 E-01 Electrical Legend 8 8 17
13 E-02 Electrical Abbreviations 8 8 17
14 E-03 Electrical Typical Details 8 8 16
15 E-04 Electrical Typical Details 8 8 16
16 E-05 PAC Building -Electrical 120 & 480 Volt Power & Lighting Plan 40 40 80
17 E-07 PAC Building -Block Diagram/Schematics 30 20 50
18 E-08 Lighting Panel and Conduit Schedules 20 10 30
19 N-01 Instrumentation Legend 6 13 19
20 N-02 Instrumentation Typical Details 6 13 19
21 N-03 PAC -P& ID 30 25 55
Total 507 370 877
No. of Drawings 21 21 21
Hrs/sht 24 18 42
11/26/2002
City of Englewood
PAC and Ammonia Storage/Feed Systems
Spreadsheet of Anticipated Effort and Cost
Task
PIG
180
Houck Petit J Garside G Sagehorn M Scott
166 146 103 . 139 . 79
Burdick GADD WP/Seer $5.n
116 65 49 Expensts Total Hours.,. P.E.C.E. Total FEE
~tJKJ~!J?!(,Mffllri9f~, .~:-~Ti~A:.:.--.:-~;.;~."~'~-:~?t/:.f~l,!/ .. ~.,~~:~\:(~t~~~;~;:.~~~!tr17t ~F·J!f:~.f/ta~~t~l~?i'~~~~,r.~~~~,,~~:,-~;-Y't'! -1' ... ..·~R!1~~
1.1 Attend Meeting 0 4 0 4 4 0 4 0 O $0 16 $92 $2, 188
1.2 Meeting Minutes 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 $0 2 $12 $218
Total Hours
Subtota l Cost
0
$0
4
$664
0
$0
6
$618
4
$556
0
$0
4
$464
0
$0
0
$0 $0
18 $104
$2 ,400
w~:£.ii!.tiiJ1na;r~~1.~J.i\l;~f~~~~t!~"f~~~ifi.E~!.~1t~'f:~ ~?~:t.: ~·~~''f·tt ... :~.t·-~~,J' : A.;. ?_f''c,;~ .~ ~ :1.~;~-~;: .. :~Ti.1~;
2 .1 Evaluation of Design Alternat ives 0 0 2 4 4 4 0 0
2 .2 Pr eliminary Layout Drawings 1 4 2 22 12 10 10 12
2 .3 Preliminary Design Progress Meeting 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0
0
2
2
$0
$200
$0
14
75
10
$81
$433
$58
Total Hours 1 B 4 30 16 14 10 12 4 99 $571
$1 .657
$8.531
$1,232
Subtotal Cost $180 $1 ,328 $584 $3,090 $2,224 $1 ,106 $1,160 $780 $196 $200 $11 ,400
l!lifl!:t121Jli!!a~ti1ces1j.:t~~~~1~~~~~~;!i:zrff-~~~~~~1~~~;z~~
3.1 Cont ract doc uments (drawings) 1 4 2 80 94 74 137 370 4 $200 766 $4,420 $73,046
3.2 Contract documents (specifica tions) 1 2 2 10 8 30 20 0 4 $50 77 $444 $8,326
3.3 90% Complete Progress Meeti ng 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 $50 6 $35 $981
3.4 Engineer's Opinion of Bid Cost 1 1 0 8 0 8 6 0 4 $0 28 $162 $2,856
Total Hours
Subtotal Cost
3
$540
11
$1,826
4
$584
98
$10.094
102
$14 ,178
112 165
$8.848 $19 , 140
495
~9'1oJl~:l!J$#,g~"tW~~~~~~~¥!tlE!.'
4 .1 30% Review by CE Statt 2 0 4 0 4 0 0
4 .2 90% Review by CE Statf 2 0 4 0 2 0 8
Total Hours 4
Subtotal Cost $720
0
$0
8
$1,168
0
$0
6
$834
0
$0
8
$928
370
$24 ,050
12
$588 $300
an $5,060
$85,208
Ji ~~~ .. ~m-,. { ·;~ \?'"(~.-'!:? ... ·.:z::r--:...:7~ • ~> :~ if ... <: ~ :'-:~:~~:-~~l.?, _ t'~~J
0
0
0
$0
0
0
0
$0
$50
$50
$100
10
16
26
$58
$92
$150
$1 ,608
$2,292
$3.900
WWWmlii#~~~l?~.;"~pes ~ : .. ~~ ·~J·~·~~.~'~"'~:~i~.:;.;::)~:.-t-:-"~ .. ~-~~--~··t:._.?:~:1!;~~f#J£1:':ili1~1~*·i,1_~{~~;"1/-i.~4~!~~~t~1 ... ,,., ·lt~~~l::n:n ... ~~: .. ~c:"'~-.-~·.'i_-· .. ,, -.:., ~t;_,.j-__ \.·. ~ .. ·· -.!_;,.,_::,_~ :::-::.
5. 1 Bidding Assi stance
5.2 Addenda
5.3 Pre-Bid Meeting , Bid Opening Summary
Total Hours
Subtotal Cost
0
0
0
0
$0
2 0
2 0
4 0
8 0
$1,328 $0
8 2 0
8 0 0
4 0 0
20 2
$2 ,060 $278 $0
2 0 0 $0 14 $8 1 $1,747
0 2 4 $300 16 $92 $1,874
0 0 0 $0 8 $46 $1,122
2 2 4 38 $219
$232 $130 $196 $300 $4,743 $107,652
11 /26/2002
City of Englewood
PAC and Ammonia Storage/Feed Systems
Spreadsheet of Anticipated Effort and Cost
. :·. :: ~~,.;-·, !: .... ;,,".. . >'-•·~' "· ;'.:c';-!'i:!10:.:_--;:~'!:;·)·.~i;i:.;::e?:• ~··< c <L~ PIO._ .• :.'Houck ;::\P,etit J Garside . G Sa!jeliom M Scott -Burdick •. ·• CADD:·"'·-WP/Secr· 'j r liV-~$$5.iitN.f;°;f';',, .. ,) :C~'.;;;<;;1 ... ~~'ltiMlmiMSiiW~'7?~-·._".:'l:'::iio ,;~;.11~:.'£'..'-'•~cH'l'·,_·~.~~_·.~-· 1_8JU_':_~-~-·.·1_ .. 66_ .. _._t"~·.·" .. 1 .. 4',6·.; TKJNq,.,.1,39;''7.. -~_·,~79, .··~.,-;·1;1_6, ._•t1 '!:_6s:~---~-::'8.49&!111!'_-__ :"-E.x_~_-_ .· ses_"ti'!: __ .To __ 1a_1._.l:l!!urr.:_._:_:~_~P:_ .E_CJE_:_~_-• .Tota_l _lf_EE;$._ >l_
6 .1 Engineer site vis its (I x/month @4hrs/visit for 6 months) 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 O O $0 24 $138 $2 .610
6 .2 Office Eng (4 hrs/month for 6 months) 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 O 0 $0 24 $138 $2,610
6.3 Shop Drawing Review
Division 3 Shop Drawings Review [3]:
Division 5 Shop Drawings Review [2):
Division 9 Shop Drawings Review [ 1):
Division 11 Shop Drawings Review (2):
Division 15 Shop Drawings Review (4):
Division 15 HVAC Shop Drawings Review (1):
Division 13 Shop Drawings Review [3):
Division 16 Shop Drawings Revie w: [3)
6 .4 Review Monthly Progress Payment
6 .5 Review Change Orders (1)
6 .6 Reply to Conlraclo~s RFls (5)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Hours 2
Subtotal Cost $360
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
2
6
$996
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
0
0
3
3
3
3
0
0
12
8
13
93
$9.579
11
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
$2.502
0
0
0
4
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
11
0
2
2
t5 26
$1,t85 $3 .016
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
1
0
10
$490
$40
$20
$50
$50
$40
$10
$40
$30
$60
$50
$50
$440
12
8
4
8
15
4
12
12
12
16
19
170
$69
$46
$23
$46
$87
$23
$69
$69
$69
$92
$110
$981
$1 ,687
$1,088
$431
$770
$t .354
$391
$1 ,434
$1 ,424
$1 .365
$2 ,091
$2.292
$19,549
"'.:.•HJ'C~.!~'~· -. ~~... · · t· .. ~.,_:~-<; .. ~!:'
Notes:
(##) •Jenotes the number of shop drawings anticipated to be reviewed under that section of the spec ificat io n
(1) A ssumes a total of 4 hours of field observation per month for 6 months during construction (lime for progress meetings included)
(2) Assumes the review of 6 progress payment applications at 2 hour ea .
(3) Assumes that 1 change order is processed
(4) Assumes that contractor submits 5 RFls at 4 hours ea.
(5) Assume 3 to 4 hours per shop drawings review.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Englewood Water and Sewer Board
FROM: Bill McCormick, Operations Supt. -Utilities
DATE: December 10, 2002
RE: Sanitary Sewer Lining Improvements
The Utilities ' Distribution and Collections crew discovered two sanitary sewer
lines that needed repair during flushing. The lines were videotaped and it was
confirmed that both 8 " clay lines were in failure with extens ive cracking. The first
repair segment is located in S. Zuni Street between W. Bates Ave. and W.
Cornell Avenue for a distance of 271 feet. The second segment is located
between S. Washington St. and S . Clarkson St. just north of US 285 for a
distance of 326 feet.
Due to dangerous cond itions and restricted access, the trenchless pipe
rehabilitation method is recommended. This method is proposed to minimize
traffic disruptions, interference with other utilities, construction impacts on
residents and replacement of pavement and other surface improvements. With
this method, a heavy plastic lining is installed aga inst the interior surface of the
original pipe and the ex isting active service connections are reestablished.
Requests for Bid were sent to two vendors for the Sanitary Sewer Pipeline
Improvements Project. A bid opening was held on December 10, 2002 and the
following responses were received :
lnsituform
Western Slope
$32,600.40
$36,034.30
Utilities Department personnel is requesting Water and Sewer Board approve of
the Award of Bid to lnsit uform and issue a Notice to Proceed for this project.
lntegra Engineering has done the technical evaluation and concluded that
lnsituform submitted the lowest, acceptable bid.
Printed o n Rec•1cled Paper .J~
Bid Tabulation
City of Englewood
CIPP Lining
Sanitary Sewer Improvement Project
Bid Date: December 10, 2002, 10:00 a.m. MDT
Contractor Acknowledge
Addenda Bid Bond
Western Slope Utilities, Inc.
Dan Cohen
0068 Continental Court, Unit B8 1 Yes
BreckenridQe, CO 80424
lnsituform Technologies, Inc.
Jennifer S. Erickson
9654 Titan Court 1 Yes
Littleton, CO 80125
$
$
lntegra Engineering Page I of I
Total Bid Price
Bid, dollars
$ 36,034 .30
$ 32,600.40
,,
DEC-10-2002 16:35 FROM: T0:303 783 6894
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • integra engineering
December l 0, 2oo2
Mr. Bill McConnic.k
Utilities Operations Superintendent
l 000 Englewood Park:way
Englewood, Colo~do 80110
Dear Bill:
450 D«atur Suect. Denwr, CO 80204
(303} 825· 1802 Fax (303) 825-2322
C!P P lining Sani1ary Sewer Improvements
Evaluation of Proposals for Con.~truction
Seuled proposals to construct the CIPP Lining Sanitary Sewer Improvements were received by
the Englewood Purchasing Manager on December JO, 2002. Two bids were received before the
deadline at 10:.00 a.n1. MDT.
Insituform Tcchnologit:s submitted the low bid of $32,600.40. The second bid for $36,034.30
from Western Slope Utilities, Inc. w.as 10.5 percent higher tban the low bid. Based on the
nanow difference in bid costs, the bids represent the fair market value of the proje(."t at this time.
The bid result-; are summarized in Tahle 1. One addendum was issued during the bid perio<l .
Both bidders acknowledged the addendum.
Table 1 Bid Summary
-Insituform We~tem Slope Engineer's ltem Tcchnologfos Utilities Estimate
Bid bond yes yes
Attended pre-bid yes yes
Tota.I (\instnicrion Cosf · 32,600.40 $36,034.-30 $24,665.00
Engineer's Cost E.s-timuie . Our estimate established a probable bid cost <>f $24,665 for the
project The low bid of 32,600 is 32 ptrreent more than our cost estimate. Our estimate used a
~n i t cost of $29.65 per linear foot of installed 8-inch diameter CIPP pipeline based on similar
projects and the relatively small size of the project. The unit co:,1s quoted in the bids wen~ $41
and $49.90 per linear foot of installed CI.PP pipeline. The difference in these unit c~sts accounts
for approximately $6,780 or Dearly all of the difference bctw1::en the engineers estimate and the
low bid. The bids received ret1cct a high ly competitive pipeline market.
Contr"ctor Qualiflcutions. J?y ~ubmitting a bid. each bidder has certified tha.t. he jg licensed in
the State of Colorado to do the work, that be is competent, knowledgeable, skilled, and is
~ ..... • • • • • • • • • • PRACTICAL SOLut:IONS -
. '
,' QEC-10-2002 16:35 FROM: T0:303 783 6894
Ci Ly of Englewood December 10, 2002
regularly engaged . in the work called for in the Contract Documents. The C:ity may require
.additional docµinentation of the Contractor's qualifications prior to award of a contract .
lrisitufi.mn Technologies developed the cured-in-place pipe (ClPP) process in 1971. Since 1977,
over 10 million linear feet of lnsituform have been installed in the United States . Insitufonn
Technologies is a publicly owned company traded on the NASDAQ exchange. The company
has the most experience and longest record of product perfonnance of CIPP pipe . Based on this
record, Insituform Techuolpgies is well qualified to perform the Sanitary Sewer CIPP
.Improvements.
Conclusion and Recommendation. We .recommend award of the project to lnsituform
Technologies, Inc. for the low bid amount of $32,600.40 . lf you have any questions or require
additional assistance, please call us.
Sincerely,
lntegra Engineering
~~.~~
Principal
In tegra Engineering Page 2 o/2