HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-10-14 WSB AGENDAt
WATER& SEWER BOARD
AGENDA
Tuesday, October 14, 2003
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ROOM
1. MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 9, 2003 MEETING. (ATT. 1)
2. GUEST-JOE PERELESS -DRURY INN. (ATT. 2)
3. GUEST-4020 S. ELATI ST. -TOM & TRUDY HIGHBOLD. RE: HIGH WATER
BILL. (ATT. 3)
4. LETTER FROM DENVER WATER BOARD DATED 9/8/03 REGARDING CLOUD
SEEDING . (ATT . 4)
5 . RECORDS RETRIEVAL SYSTEM -PROPOSAL FROM TWINSTAR . (ATT. 5)
6. LETTER DATED 9-30-03 FROM DA YID HILL REGARDING NEW CITY DITCH
AGREEMENT . (ATT . 6)
7 . VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT BIDS. (ATT. 7).
8. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
LETTER FROM STU FONDA DATED 9-24-03 TO BEN NlGHTHORSE
CAMPBELL. (A TT. 8)
DENVER POST ARTICLE DATED 9-28-03 "DENVER WATER DOES TEST FOR
NDMA." (ATT. 9)
LETTERS FROM DA YID HILL RE: SOUTH SUBURBAN (ATT . 10)
9. SOUTH ENGLEWOOD CONNECTOR'S AGREEMENT . (ATT. 11)
10 . OTHER.
.. . -,-
WATER AND SEWER BOARD
MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 9, 2003
Ar T. I
The meeting was called to order at 5 :06 p.m.
Members present:
Members absent:
Also present:
Higday, Otis , Habenicht, Moore (via
speakerphone)
Wolosyn , Clark, Cassidy, Bradshaw, Kasson
(long-term medical absence)
Stewart Fonda, Director of Utilities
1. MINUTES OF THE AUGU ST 19 , 2003 MEETING.
The Englewood Water and Sewer Board appro v ed the minutes from the August 19 , 2003
m eeting.
Mr. Otis moved ;
Mr. Moore seconded :
A yes:
Nays:
Members absent:
Motion carried.
To approve the Minutes from the August 19 ,
2003 Englewood Water and Sewer Board
Meeting.
Higday, Otis, Habenicht, Moore
None
Wolosyn , Clark, Cassidy, Bradshaw, Kasson
2. LICENSE AGREEMENT -FIRST CHURCH OF CHRJST.
The First Church of Christ, located at 3701 S. Logan St. submitted a License Agreement
for a dry creek bed within the City Di tch right-of-way that runs through the front portion
of their property. This agreement will allow the First Church of Christ to install a river
rock dry creek bed for landscaping purposes over the existing easement.
Mr. Otis moved;
Mr. Habenicht seconded:
Ayes:
Nays:
Members absent:
Motion carried.
To approve the License Agreement for a dry
creek bed over the City Ditch for the First
Church of Christ at 3701 S. Logan St.
Higday, Otis , Habenicht, Moore
None
Wolosyn , Clark, Cassidy, Bradshaw, Kasson
3. LETTER FROM DA YID HILL REGARDING SOUTH SUBURBAN.
The Board received a copy of a letter from David Hill dated August 7, 2003 regarding the
South Suburban Intergovernmental Agreement, decree #92CS 166.
4. ARTICLE FROM THE DENVER POST-"DENVER WATER EXPECTS
LITTLE SPLASH FROM RATE HIKE."
The Board received a copy of an article titled, "Denver Water expects little splash from
rate hike." The article discusses Denver's 5% rate hike and notes, "Englewood has the
cheapest rates in the metro region, second only to Denver Water."
5. GARY KASSON.
The Board received notice that Gary Kasson was seriously injured in a motorcycle
accident near Castle Rock on August 8, 2003 . The Board directed that flowers be sent
when he is stabilized with a note extending the Board's sympathy and wishes for a
successful recovery.
6 . DON INGLE AND JOHN BOCK -SOFTWARE PROCUREMENT
CONTRACT WITH ADVANCED UTILITY SYSTEMS.
Don Ingle, Englewood's Director of Information Technology, and John Bock the Utilities
Department's Manager of Administration, appeared to discuss the Software Procurement
Contract with Advanced Utility Systems.
In 2001 the City began the process of selecting a new utility billing/customer information
system to replace the antiquated system developed in-house over 20 years ago .
Responses were received from the Request for Proposal , and the Information Technology
Department felt that the products and services offered by Advanced Utility Systems best
met the City's selection criteria.
Mr. Ingle noted that the proposed system cost is not to exceed $950 ,000 and would be
implemented by August 2004 . The Board concurred with proceeding with the Advanced
Utility System proposal and directed that it be forwarded directly to Council when the
contract is finalized.
7. LETTER FROM DAVID HILL REGARDING BEADLES WELLS Al'ID AUG.
PLAN.
The Board received a letter from David Hill dated August 28, 2003 regarding case
#02CW285 regarding the Beadles Wells and Augmentation Plan. Mr. Hill approved
consolidating the two Beadles cases in Division One but refused their request that
Englewood get out of the cases believing they could have a serious effect on the South
Platte River and its tributaries.
The meeting adjourned at 5:47 p.m.
The next Water and Sewer Board meeting will be Tuesday, October 14, 2003 in the
Community Development Conference Room.
Respectfully submitted,
Cathy Burrage
Recording Secretary
• ATT. 2
-fJRURY----------------------ulW"u C 0rwy !ms, Inc.· 721 &nerSOll ~. Sllile 400 ·St low, MO 63141 nu1 J ~ 314-429-22ss· r.ax 31 ....... 29·3679
October 3, 2003
Englewood Water & Sewer Board
City of Englewood
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, CO 80110
Sent by Telecopy and by Overnight Mail
Re : Drury Inns, .l.nc . Sewer Tap Agreement with the City of Englewood (the
"Agreement"):
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen :
On August 8, 2003 . I received a letter from John Bock, Utilities Manager of
Administration regarding the Agreement. While we sincerely appreciate the City's offer
to allow a payment plan for the amount due the City as set forth in John's letter, we
would like to appeal the amount that John said was due and payable pursuant to the
Agreement.
As T stated in my letter to Mr . Fonda on August 11, 2003 , I don't think anyone ever
envisioned the possibility of ever exceeding 16, 100 gallons per day without having a
logical explanation for the overage. That js why the Agreement provided for an
immediate explanation to be made to the City in order to potentially negate any increased
lap fee . We had thought tha t .our hotel staff was aware of this prov:ision and would
contact the City and our corporate office if and when there was ever an overage .
Unfortunately, that was not the case and now we are faced with a large tap fee for events
that took place in the winter of 2001/2002, even though we went through the entire winter
of 2002/2003 without any excess usage . You can imagine that it is extremely difficult to
recreate the events Lhat could have caused an overage at this late date. The Agreement
does provide some checks and balances , in that the City ''will monitor winter, bi-monthly
water usage at the hole] during a five (5) year period." Unfortunately, not only did we
fail to catch the overage at the time, but so did the City.
While the Agreemenl stales that if we exceed a daily water usage of 16, 100 gaJlons
without providing the City with an explanation for the overage , we are asking that you
consider reducing the amount that could be assessed by not basing the fee on the highest
amount shown in our reports (March 15 , 2002-29,300 gallons), but by basing the fee on
the average of lhe seven (7) times we exceeded the 16, 100 gallons or 21.471 gallons
based on the reports filed with the City.
i:sv·oN t>689£8l£0£'t ~ ) CTN~ a
Englewood Water & Sewer Board
Page-2-
Here is our reasoning. First of all. there is a bust in the March 15, 2002 number. (See
Exhibit A) On March 13t\ the read1ng was 129176; on the 14th the reading was 129131
(less than the day before, which is impossible) arid on the 15m, the reading was 129424
resulting in a large deviation of 298.
Second, with respect to the other "overages", it is possible that the time the readings in
question were taken could actually res\llt in 2 days worth ofreadinjs being included in
one day's calculation. For example, if the reading on February 24 (See Exhibit B) was
taken early in the morning before OW" guests starting taking showers and before we
started washing the hotel's linens and if the reading on the 2Sth was taken after our guests
had taken showers and after we staned washing our hotel's linens, we would have had 2
days of heavy usage included in the reading. We actually had less rooms rented on the
25th when the high usage took place than on the 24tb.
Utilizing the average of 21,471 gallons results in an increased fee of $41.055 (21,471
gallons less 16,100 gallons equals 5,371 gallons or 33 gallons per guest room). Applying
the fonnula set forth in the Agreement results in Drury Inns, Inc. paying the City an
additional tap fee of$41,055 .
While we were in error fot not immediately notifying you of the supposed excess usage
(for example, March 15, 2002 clearly couldn't have occUlTed due to the error in writing
down the amount used), we believe it is not fa1r for the City to come to us now for
amounts due from the winter of 200 l /2002 when we wellt through the entire winter of
200212003 without an overage. While we would prefer not to pay any tap fee increase,
we believe a fair and equitable so .lution is to base the increase on the average.
Tha.nk you for considering our request.
Sincerely,
DRURY INNS, INC.
By &+-/) f .._£_
Joseph B. Perelcs
Vice President Development
v689£Bl£0~t ~ ) aN~ a
t>0~ t8t>'ON
. -
I •
I
,, J
WATER METER ¢0NTROt,
DAU.. Y READtNO
;,, •• 1.
j .--· .. -. ·-· ·, 1 f ~
I -__ ,. --.......
" . ' . ··-I
I
I --·-. ---· . --.... ..._.._
\..oc&Jion: On.I)' Inn &. Su i t~i Melli?\: March 2002
.... l
I I~
Jli
21 fl
t>689£8L£0£t ~ J aNl:::I a
I
' I
I
I
t
I
I
I
J
!I '
If
~
I.
I
I ' , I µ
I)
I!
I '
1 '
•
~
50~ tst-·ON
I
I
' . ..-, . . ~ '; ,.f "'.'.·' / " ...... '!' .... ,.
1
I
I
I
I
WATER MBTBR qoNTlWL
DAILY R:EAil>!NO
~xalion : ONO' Jnn " S\&itt•
D.t
111
I ,. . 2·
. is
t 16
; l 7
I 18
~ 1 g
20 1
'
t>689£8l£0£t ~ J CTN~ a
/ ol oo
J 2. 00
yJo<J ·
/'1~Q ()
)
I
I •
October 5, 2003
Tom and Trudy Heibel
4020 S. Elati Street
Englewood, Co 80110
Phone: (303) 910-8080 Fax: (303) 761-4083
Re: Tom and Trudy Heibel Water Board Agenda
ATT. 3
Our agenda for the next water board meeting consists of the following:
1) Reducing our quarterly payment down to an average that is consistent
with prior quarterly bills
2) Getting an answer to why our water bill was increased to a level that
clearly was never achieved
3) Getting an answer to why our water meter was removed (without our
permission), dismantled and then thrown away.
4) Getting an answer to why we could not keep our water meter, which
is property of the homeowner.
5) Receiving a copy of the request by the Englewood Water Board to the
State Public Utilities Commission that outlines the rate increase that
has been affected on our water bill.
6) Receiving a copy of all notices (in compliance with C.R.S. 40-3-104
paragraph A thru D, Section I) clearly outlining the change in effective
rate for our home.
7) Establishing an understanding as to why we have been denied many
basic rights as out lined in C.R.S. 40-3-104 and who is responsible.
8) Why we are being denied access to our water meter for billing
purposes.
9) Why the City of Englewood has violated C.R.S. 37-97-103 subsection
2.
MEMORANDUM
To: Stewart Fonda, Utilities Director
From: John Bock, Utilities Manager of Administratio~
Date: October 6 , 2003
Subject: 4020 S. Elati St.
The Utilities Department has received a complaint from Thomas and Trudy Heibel
regarding high water meter readings for their residence at 4020 S. Elati St.
The quarterly water meter reading taken on July 8, 2003 showed a consumption of
2 ,2 66 ,000 gallons for a three month period. This meter reading was obtained using the
Itron radio frequency meter reading system. Field Services Coordinator Randy Pierce ,
suspecting a malfunction in the radio transmitter, had one of the Field Service
Technicians go back to the residence to take a meter reading directly off of the meter.
That reading showed a consumption of 177 ,000 gallons. On August 1, 2003 a bill was
issued based on that consumption.
On August 11, 2003 , the existing meter was replaced with a new Badger meter with a
new ERT (radio transmitter unit). The dial on the new meter read 0 gallons. The old
Hersey meter was taken to the meter shop and, as is our procedure, disposed of
On August 26, 2003 , the Heibels, having received their water bill with the charges based
on the 177 ,000 gallons ($289.46) called and asked for a reread and for us to check for
leaks. The Technician who visited their home found no evidence of leaks and advised
them to watch the meter when their irrigation system was running. No adjustment was
granted.
Since that time there have been a number of phone calls discussing the situation with the
Heibels. The City has offered (also in writing) to conduct a water audit. If a leak is
found and they fix it immediately, their account can be adjusted as provided for in the
Municipal Code (12-lD-3). As of the date of this memo there has been no audit.
Attached is a chronology of the meter readings, consumptions and activities associated
with 4020 S. Elati St.
Printed o n Recycled Paper.®
...
'
April 18,2000
July 20, 2000 (93 days)
July 26, 2000 (6 days)
October 2, 2000 (69 days)
January?, 2001
May 11, 2001 (
July 5, 2001 (55 days)
August 20, 2001
September 21, 2001 (78 days)
October 16 , 2001 (25 days)
January 14, 2002 (90 days)
April 8, 2002 (85 days)
4020 S Elati
344 reading off remote meter
17 thousand/gals consumption for billing
432 reading off remote meter
88 thousand/gals consumption for billing
478 reading off remote meter-FINAL BILL
NEW OWNER
46 thousand/gal consumption for billing
601 reading off remote meter
123 thousand/gal consumption for billing
603 reading off meter -New meter & remote
installed
2 thousand/gal consumption for billing
0 reading on new Hersey meter and remote
Gate locked unable to read -Card sent-No
reply
88 thousand/gals -Estimated the same as
7/00 consumption (same as a year ago)
88 thousand/gals consumption for billing
New tap on main and service to house
Gate locked unable to read -Card sent
28 meter reading -Customers called in reading
Credit 60 thousand/gals -over estimated
July 2001
33 meter reading -Customer called in reading
5 thousand/gals consumption for billing
41 meter reading -Customer called in reading
8 thousand/gals consumption for billing
Remote removed by customer -card sent repair
No response
20 thousand/gals estimated
( 61 reading?)
July 8, 2002 (91 days)
October 16, 2002 (100 days)
Unable to read -Card sent repair No reply
25 thousand/gals estimated for billing
(86 reading?)
125 read off inside meter -Repairs done -Final
off inside meter
ERT added to meter
39 thousand/gals for billing
October 16, 2002 0 reading NEW ERT radio removed remote
**December 20, 2002 (65 days) 3 reading offERT -FINAL BILL NEW OWNER
(Heibel)
3 thousand/gals consumption for billing
January 21, 2003 (32 days) 12 reading off ERT
9 thousand/gals consumption for billing
April 10 , 2003 (80 days) 59 reading offERT
47 thousand/gals consumption for billing
July 8, 2003 (89 days) 2325 reading off ERT -REREAD REQUIRED
July 16 , 2003 (95 days) Customer request pressure flow test
Pressure Regulator after meter -should
remove to get better flow 5.3 lgpm
236 reading off inside meter -owner to set up
repair bad ER T
177 thousand/gals consumption for billing
August 11 , 2003 (26 days) 316 reading off inside meter took offbad ERT
80 thousand/gals consumption
0 reading off New Badger METER ANDERT
August 26, 2003 (15 days) Customer asks for reread hi bill and check
for leaks
September 3, 2003
September 3, 2003
No leaks found at that time
16 reading off inside meter
16 thousand/ gals consumption
Customer advised to check meter reading
when using irrigation system for leaks.
Ms. Heibel called left message if there was
to be an adjustment on July billing
left message on Heibel' s answering machine
to call City of Englewood
September 9, 2003
September 10, 2003
September 11, 2003
September 22, 2003 (38 days)
Looking at the consumption
Randy Pierce talked to Mr. Heibel he said
Ms. Heibel will call me back
E-mail to City Manager from Ms. Heibel
Letter sent to Mr . & Ms. Heibel from Randy
Pierce for us to do a water audit for possible
water leak -No reply
29 reading off ERT
13 thousand/gals consumption
• 7/16/03 reading of 236 old meter not bad ERT
• 8/11 /03 reading of 316 old meter not bad ERT consumption of 80 thousand/gals
• 8/1 1/03 reading ofO off new meter and new ERT
• 8/26 /03 reading of 16 off new meter and ERT consumption of 16 thousand/gals
• 9122103 reading of29 off new ERT consumption of 13 thousand/gals
• October reading may be in the range of 109 + thousand/gals
Possibility;
That the pressure regu l ator was causing a low flow to irrigation system and timer
was set high to compensate for low flow .
If regulator was remo v ed , and there was more flow , WAS timer reset to lower
setting or left at higher se tt ing .
Field Services Reps comments grass was green and full at times they were there.
They just wanted more water so irrigation heads would work better! And were open to
repair the bad ER T at time for pressure and flow investigation.
Denver Board of Water Commissioners
Richard A. Kirk, President
Denise S. Maes., 1st Vice President
Daniel E. Muse
William R. Roberts
Andrew D. Wallach
September 8, 2003
Mr. Stu Fonda
Utilities Director
City of Englewood
3400 S. Elati
Englewood , CO 8011 O
Hamlet J. Barry, Ill, Manager
RE : 2003 Drought and Weather Modification Program
Dea~
A TT. 't
1600 West 12th Avenue
Denver, Co lorado 80204-3412
303-628-6000
Fa x 303-628-6509
hjb@water.denver.co.gov
www.denverwater.org
I am writing to thank you for partic ipating in last winter's cloud seeding program and to let you
know that we are planning on continuing the program for the winter of 2003-04. By almost a ll
accounts , the program in 2002-03 was quite successful. We had an independent evaluation
done on the program, as well as an analysis of success done by the program contractor. Both
reported 14% increased snowfall as a result of the cloud seeding effort. However, as perhaps
you know, one can never conclusively prove the success of a weather modification program.
Given the apparent success in 2002-03 , we plan another program for the winter of 2003-04.
The program we will propose for 2003-04 will be on a smaller scale than last year. I estimate
that the total cost will be $400,000 or 57% of last year's cost. I am writing you now with the
expectation that you will wish to continue your participation in t he project , and so you can plan
accordingly for the expenses of the project in your 2004 budget.
Utilizing the same participation percentages as last year , we calculate your contribution to the
program for 2003-04 to be $3,200.
Please let me know your desire with respect to participation in the program for 2003-04 . It
would be helpful to know if you will participate at the full level, at a reduced level , or not at all . In
the absence of specific communication from you on this question, we will prepare an invoice for
your participation once a spec ific contract for this year's program has been finalized.
Thank you again for your participation in the successful weather modification program
undertaken last winter . I hope you will consider participation again in the forthcoming winter
season.
Sincerely,
H.J. Barry
Manager
Weather Modification Letter.2003-04
CONSERVE
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Date Agenda Item
November 3 , 2003
ATT. 5
Subject
Records Retrieval System
Proposal
INITIATED BY
Utilities Department
STAFF SOURCE
Stewart H. Fonda, Director of Utilities
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
None.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council approval , by mot ion of the pu rchase of a records retrieval system from Twinstar Inc. in
the amount of $50 ,228 .00 .
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
The Utilit ies Department is running out of storage space for records the department is
requ ired , by mandate , to keep for various periods of time. The department also does not have
an existing program in place for disaster recovery . In the case of water damage or fire,
irreplaceable and valuable documents would be irretrievable lost. A viable solution is to utilize
the City's existing document imaging system in conjunction with Twinstar Inc. to provide the
initial file configuration training and scanning of the backlog of documents along with ongoing
support. The State Archivist has recently approved this medium . The resulting backup discs
would be stored off site .
The initial effort would involve training and scanning seven years worth of billing journals and
account statuses that the State requ ires Englewood to retain. The second part would
encompass a records disaster recovery system, which would entail categorizing and scanning
all-important documents . Englewood 's Information Technology Department has investigated
various service providers and selected Twinstar as the most acceptable vendor.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Twinstar has submitted a proposal for a total project cost, assuming all is done in a single
phase, and exclusive of new persona l computers or network infrastructure is estimated at
$50,228.00 .
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Proposal dated October 1, 2003 from Twinstar Inc.
* *
TWINSTAR
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
TECHNICAL EDUCA TI ON
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
October 1, 2003
Mr. Tony Edwards, IT Department
Mr. John Bock , Utilities Department
C ity of Englewood
Dear Tony and John:
INC
9245 OSCEOLA STREET
WESTMINSTER, CO 80030
(303) 430-7101
FAX 426-6397
Thanks for the opportunity to work with you and your team to identify a solution
for your document imaging needs. As an IBM Authorized Business Partner and
a Kofax Certified Reseller , I am pleased to offer this proposal for budget and
planning purposes. The solutions we recommend herein are based on
requirements we have discussed in the past month at your location and in all
subsequent phone conversat ions . This document is a work in progress, in the
sense that we can still refine it further. Once you have read this proposal, we will
follow up for further discussion.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
IBM 's Content Manager Multiplatform provides an excellent platform for
accomplishing the document imaging and object archiving goals of City of
Englewood's (COE's) Utilities Department. Augmented by the Kofax Ascent
Capture process for high-speed scanning (and importing) and automatic or
manual indexing, the CM solution can capture and store large volumes of
documents and other electronic objects (including word processing documents,
spreadsheets, digitized photos , etc .). Where possible (via barcode recognition,
OCR, or intelligence built into the file name) the system can automatically index
these documents and electronic objects for retrieval. For scanned documents,
Kofax Ascent also provides forms recognition and zonal barcode recognition and
OCR capabilities that allow very precise differentiation between multiple
barcodes and/or strings of indexing text. Constrained hand-print recognition
(ICR) is also supported .
Once captured and released to the Content Manager application on the Windows
server, the documents and other objects can be easily retrieved in response to
inquiries. The use of your Windows server to store and maintain the images
provides the ability to closely integrate the benefits of the imaging system into
your line-of-business applications,
In addition to scanning, your so lution will support import of electronic objects
including*:
• Archived text documents
• Brochures and community documents
• Microsoft Word documents, and
• Spreadsheets
*This is not a complete list, but is meant to show examples of possible
documents.
I appreciate the work you 'v e put into researching COE 's volumes of documents.
The selection process for components of an imaging solution is largely based on
peak monthly volumes of document pages or objects to be captured. We are
proposing a solution based on a peak monthly volume (for on-going business
operations) in the Utilities Department of about 2000 document pages to be
scanned or imported. COE 's priority requirements for capture will be addressed
by the scanning of paper documents , importing images off CO (from outsource
scanning vendor), and potentially importing electronic objects via Ascent
Capture. We propose 1 scan workstation with a medium-volume scanner that
can easily handle a day 's volume of critical work in the Utilities department.
Other priorities that we have identified are the need to back-up, as well as
a rchive (onto CD/DVD) several different types of original Utilities documents. In
addition to Journal and Status documents, our proposed solution will enable the
Utilities department to capture and store (as images) lawyers' invoices, water
rights documentation, and other important documents such as expansion project
documentation.
In implementing the imaging project , it is our understanding that one or both of
you would manage the project for City of Englewood, and that Twinstar would
provide the necessary supporting products and technical services. As is our
policy, our support would include a rich level of skills transfer to your staff, to
promote your chosen level of self-sufficiency in the future. All Twinstar services
will be delivered under the terms and conditions of our Services Agreement and
related Statement(s) of Work.
PROJECT SCOPE and RESPONSIBILITIES
City of Englewood will provide overall project management, with support from
Twinstar. The proposed responsibilities of each party are outlined here:
City of Englewood will:
• Provide and install the necessary personal computers for scanning and
retrieval of images
• Provide the necessary network wiring and configure the required
Windows server connections for all workstations
• Provide availability of IT department management and technical
personnel to work with the Twinstar technical personnel for
implementation of the image system
• Provide coordination between Twinstar personnel and the end-users of
the system during implementation activities , including arranging
schedules for user training, and for installation of components
Twinstar, Inc. will:
• Source all software , as well as all remaining hardware (Fujitsu and
Kofax imaging components) as listed later in this proposal
• Provide implementation support as detailed in this section
• Provide on-going post-production technical support as described in this
proposal
• Strive during all project phases to provide skills transfer to COE 's
technical and operational staff, to help promote their ability to support
this system in-house
Assumptions
The pricing and explanations included in this proposal were developed assuming
that COE agrees to upgrade their current installations of Ascent to version 6.05,
as proposed by Twinstar under separate cover. All system requirements for
workstations are dependent upon the upgrade to Kofax Ascent version 6 having
been performed prior to the implementation of the solution proposed in this
document.
Timeline
Given our current project load, and allowing for the order and delivery cycle for
hardware and software components, Twinstar can be available to begin
implementation in early October. Allowing for rigorous testing, necessary
adjustments, and thorough user training, we would anticipate that City of
Englewood could bring the Utilities capture and image system into production
use by late October, 2003 . Because Twinstar can be engaged by new or
existing customers for new projects at any time, the timeline discussed here
assumes that we receive your order for this project in the very near future.
Twinstar Implementation Support and Project Services
As an IBM and Kofax Image Products Authorized Solution Provider, Twinstar will
provide project coordination , implementation, and training services, to ensure
that your image implementation delivers the expected results, and that your staff
is equipped to administer the system after it is installed. The estimates shown
here are "best efforts " estimates, and are subject to change should additional or
unfo reseen requirements arise during implementation.
Estimated
Hours to
Task Complete
Project planning and coordination ........................................................... 8
Provide creation/configuration of index classes and associated
entities in IBM Content Manager ............................................. 8
Provide on-site installation , configuration, and training on Kofax Ascent
scan /capture subsystem, and 1 Fujitsu scanner to include
creation /configuration/testing of up to 3 batch classes ................ 16
Provide user training on all capture components from Scan , through
Recognition, Validation , and release ....................................... 8
Provide on-s ite installation of CM Client software on 1 View I Print
workstation, and provide user training on the use of the
CM Client , And skills transfer to COE's techn ical staff for
additional installations .......................................................... 8
Provide on-site implementation support during testing and cutover to
production ......................................................................... 8
Provide testing/validation /interface support with outsource scanning
vendor ............................................................................... 8
Total Implementation Support ................................................................... 64
Actual hours of support may be shifted between tasks depending upon actual
requirements as the implementation proceeds.
The total estimate for implementation support is 64 hours of services at our
current consulting rate of $140 per hour, or $8960. In addition, for on-site work,
reasonable and documented travel expenses (including travel time and vehicle
mileage, estimated at $500) are reimbursable by the customer.
On-Going Support from Twinstar and IBM
I would suggest that you include in your budget for this project some continuing
support from Twinstar, at our regular hourly rate. This support will be used to
supplement the skills we transfer to your staff, and to explore and implement
additional CM and capture functions as needed. This continuing support would
begin when your first application goes into production, and I'd suggest a level of
up to 4 hours of pre-paid support per month for the first six months, at the
discounted price of $500 per month. Total cost: $3,000.00
Also, it is assumed that you will contract (or have contracted) for IBM
Software Support for Content Manager.
HARDWARE and SOFTWARE COMPONENTS
As a Kofax Image Products Value-added reseller, and an authorized remarketer
for Fujitsu scanners, Twinstar will source all of the components shown here, at
the discounted prices shown below.
Scanner:
• Fujitsu 4340C duplex color scanner. This scanner has a capacity of 40
pages-per-minute monochrome (80 images per minute, duplex), and
comes equipped with a 100-sheet automatic document feeder as well
as a flatbed.
This scanner has a 3 month on-site warranty, with available options to upgrade.
You can upgrade this in-warranty service to same-day on-site for the first year
(pricing is below). This scanner attaches to the Kofax Capture system via a
SCSI adapter board and cable. Here are your discounted prices for the scanning
hardware components:
Fujitsu 4340C scanner: $4745.25
SCSI Adapter board and cable: $250.00
Upgrade 3 month warranty to next-day, on-site response for one year: $1195.00
Total prices for scanning components: $6190.25
Personal Computer/Server Specifications
Kofax Ascent Capture, in a network installation model, requires a server with
specific manufacturer's requirements. Additionally , the scanner will require a PC
to run it and the Kofax Ascent component, and each retrieval user will require a
PC. Here are the manufacturers' recommendations for PCs to support these
functions:
• Kofax Ascent Capture Server Requirements:
• Recommended: Pentium class 600 MHz processor, Intel PC
capable of running Windows 2000 Pro (with SP3) or Windows 2000
Server (with SP3), 256 MB RAM, 1.5 GB of disk space free for
working space, with 300 Mbytes available on local drive where OS
resides, 1024x768 SVGA display , USB port (required for hardware
key), 100Mbps NIC
• Kofax Ascent Capture Client Requirements:
• Recommended: Any 300 MHz Pentium-II Intel PC capable of
running Windows 2000 Pro (SP3), Windows 2000 Server (SP3), or
Windows XP Pro (SP1);128 MB RAM, 420 Mbytes of disk space
free for working space along with 300 Mbytes of space on local
drive where OS resides, 1024x768 SVGA display, USB port
(required for hardware key), 1 OOMbps NIC
• Since the scanning workstations will be used for image quality
control, we recommend that they be equipped with 19-or 21-inch
monitors capable of 1280 X 1024 resolution.
Kofax Ascent Capture Version 6.05 Software:
The scan workstation will require an Ascent Scan license, which provides the
scanning, indexing, and the release process to send the document images and
index information to the CM system. We propose you implement 1 Ascent full-
function scan license, which includes 25K pages/month of scanning capability .
The price of the full-function Scan license, including the first year of annual
maintenance, is $4283.40. Under the new Version 6 packaging for Ascent, this
is the least expensive alternative to provide the function you require. The
additional sharable scan capacity you will gain can be used to accommodate the
back-scanning workload, as well as future deployments .
Twinstar Image Import
Other customers have benefited from the use of our Twinstar Image Import ("Tll")
process, which automates the detection, selection , batch creation, and importing
of files from one or more configured directories; examples of its use include
importation of incoming digital faxes (as from a fax server) or importation of
outsourced scanned images and their metadata (index values), for processing
via Kofax Ascent Capture. T l l is designed specifically to interface with the
architected auto-import features of Ascent Capture. Instead of having your
Ascent operator manually import images from an outsourcer's CD (or FTP target
directory) and then manually data-enter index values, Tll automates the import
and validation functions, creating batches that are ready for release in to Content
Manager. If desired, this same application can be configured to monitor more one
or more directory(ies), providing the ability to automatically import electronic
objects ("eDocs") other than faxes. For example, you could eventually have
users place their WORD documents, spreadsheets, pictures, etc. in particular
directories that are monitored by the Tll process, which would handle the
importation of these objects into batches for subsequent indexing.
Tll is a prerequisite for supporting the import of document images and
index values provided by an outsourcer. The one-time fee for our Tll process,
including minor customization and installation services, is $4995.
MBS Technologies' CD Archive Utility
This software application, designed to work with IBM Content Manager version
7.X , can be used to export images and their corresponding indices onto CD, or
other medium. It features an easy-to-use graphical user interface can be used to
select images and indices, as well as the target directory to which these files
should be exported. This utility will require a third party software package to
make the CD drive available for writing; however, most commercial off-the-shelf
CD burner software will meet th is requirement (typically a new computer is
shipped with such software pre-installed). The price of this software package is
$11,995. This is an enterprise license, which means that the purchase of
one license to this product w ill enable COE to use this process for
archiving all CM-based documents to CD for the future. This price includes
up to 10 days of on-site implementation and tailoring support from MBS (COE
would be responsible for travel expenses from MBS 's offices in Minneapolis,
Minnesota ). Additional implementation days , as well as an ongoing support
contract are each available at an additional price . This product has a 30 day
warranty period. Please see the document included in delivery of this proposal
for more information on the features and functions of the CD Archive Utility.
OUTSOURCED SCANNING/INDEXING SERVICES
Rocky Mountain Microfilm and Imaging (RMMI ) is a Twinstar business partner,
specializing in the capture and indexing of large quantities of back-file , as well as
current documents. They also have the capability to provide CD, and/or
microfilm or microfiche, copies of all documents they scan. RMMI has
recommended that you use microfilm for state archives, as it is an acceptable
archive medium and is more cost effective than microfiche. According to the
counts COE provided, you have 17 boxes of documents to be scanned and
indexed . This equates to approximately 60,000 pages . Accordingly, regarding
COE's back-file scanning requirements, we offer the following pricing on behalf of
RMMI, who would subcontract to Twinstar for this engagement.
Task Price
Preparation/Scanning (per page) at .09 per page ......................... $5400
Indexing of images (per document, not per page) at .05 per index
(two indices per document for billing journals as well as
account status documents), rough estimate ......................... 750
Optional pickup and return (per box) at $15 per box ........................ 255
Optional on-site scanning at COE (as opposed to RMMI
location) at approximately .05 per page .............................. 3000
CD preparation charge at 75.00 per CD (you get 2 copies of
each CD and 60,000 pages will fit on approx. 4 CD's) ............ 300
Microfilm preparation in addition to CD at .06 per page .................. 3600
Total for Outsourced Scan I Index and microfilm (approximately, assuming
documents are moved to RMMl 's site for scanning and that our document count
assumption for indexing is correct: $10,305
Additional Information
One additional copy of each CD will be provided at no additional cost, suitable for
sending to State Archives , includes images and metadata in the form of
intelligent filenames. RMMI maintains a 1 M dollar liability insurance policy
pertaining to documents lost/damaged in transit. If RMMI transports your
documents to their site , they can locate and fax a requested document to you
within one half hour, or courier the original to you within one and a half hours. If
you require delivery of scanned images on a daily/weekly basis, RMMI can
transmit them to your location via FTP.
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS
Total project costs , assuming all is done in a single phase, and exclusive of new
personal computers and addition of network infrastructure, are estimated at:
Twinstar project services (including travel expenses):
Twinstar on-going support (6 months )
Fujitsu scanner and SCS I components:
Kofax Ascent Capture 25K Scan license and maintenance
(Optional) CD Archive Utility
(Optional) Outsource back-scanning (including Tll process
and production of both CD and microfilm media):
Estimated total project cost (initial implementation)
Including all optional offerings:
TWIN ST AR References
$ 9,460 .00
3,000.00
6 ,190.00
4,283.00
11995 .00
15,300.00
$50,228.00
Twinstar has worked with about 50 customers around the country, assisting them
with the implementation of document imaging systems. Here are some of our
local references, and I encourage you to contact them concerning Twinstar's
technical capabilities and our attitude toward customer service:
• Jefferson County Recording Office : Twinstar has implemented 3 separate
imaging installations at Jefferson County, but the highest volume application
is in the Clerk and Recorder's Office. Contact Joan Card, Director of
Recording at 303-271-8172 .
• Resources Trust Company: For the past 6 years, Twinstar has worked
closely with Resources Trust, a large Denver financial company, in
implementing its document imaging system . Contact Dick Edwards, VP-IS at
303-889-7049.
• Unicover Corporation: Twinstar worked with Unicover in Cheyenne, Wyoming
to implement Content Manager along with Kofax Ascent Capture and A2iA
CheckReader for data capture from checks and other documents. Contact
Ken Eppich, IT Director at 307-771-3150.
• Focus on the Family: Twinstar worked with Focus on the Family in Colorado
Springs to implement a capture system for checks and remittance documents
using Kofax Ascent Capture and A2iA check reader, improving productivity by
60 percent. Contact Tim Reynolds, IT Dept., at 719-531-3400.
Tony or John, please contact me at any time with questions or suggestions. On
behalf of the Twinstar I IBM team, I look forward to our partnership in the future!
Sincerely ,
~~
Steve Gaumond MBA, COIA
President
I
'
I
!
I
k .·. P· -L ~· -I
i
'
,.
I
I
~-·-
MBS Technologies ' CD Archive Utility
MBS Technologies' CD Archive Utility is software that features a graphical user
interface through which images and indexes can be exported to compact disc or other
medium.
Using the graphical user interface, desired images that are stored in IBM's D B2
Content Manager software can be selected and exported to a directory, along with a
comma-separated variable flat file containing the index attribute names and values.
The CD Archive Utilit y permits users to select the target directory . The target directory
can be on the user 's workstation , on a network drive, or on a CD drive opened for
writing with FAT-like structure.
The utility requires third party software to make the CD dri v e av ailable for writing.
Most commercial off-the-shelf CD burner software will meet this requirement.
The software uses published client-side programming interfaces in IBM's DB2 Content
Manager software . It is currently is availab le for both DB2 Content Manager for
iSeries version 5.X and DB2 Content Manager for Multiplatforms version 7.X .
.
. MRS • •• TECH NOLOGI ES
SEP-30-2003 TUE 04:23 PM FAX NO.
BERG HILL GREENLEAF & Rusc1rn llP
George V. Bees. Jr.
David G. Hill
Ridwd F. GrL'l!ll!eaf
Gionnill M. Rwcicri
ATTORNEYS &: CoUNSELOllS AT LAW
1712 Pead Ser=• Boulder, Cclow:io 80302
Jon N. Baiwhck
M. Neal Hanna
Mama M. Hcidman
IJc.e Kra.Wewia
Casey S. Funk, Esq .
Denver Water Department
1600 West 12th A venue
Denver, CO 80204
P.O. Box 17l9 •Boulder, U:ilo~do 80306
Tel: 303.402.1600 •FU 3-03.402.1601
September 30, 2003
Re: New City Ditch Agreement
Dear Casey:
JolhA.Maib
Thomu E. Mcipn
~M.Morpa
John G. NcriJJc
Heidi C. Jlgucr
Swan 1Yndl Ricbarda
Julie S. Schoaiidd
KimA. Tomey
Stu objects to your proposed change in the fonnula for sharing High Line costs (i.e., the
proposed change in cost sharing which will result from shortening the ditch). Stu's point of view
is this. When the 1995 agreement was made, Stu did not anticipate that Denver would quit running
water down City Ditch and wish to reduce its annual payments for City Ditch upkeep by some
$100,000 per annum. Stu agreed to let Denver out ofits $100,000 per year maintenance obligations
in return for the one-time $257,000 to be paid on the recirculating system. He does not think it is
appropriate for Denver now to demand, in addition. an increased payment from Englewood on the
High Line, because Denver has decided to shorten the High Line . He feels that the amount
Englewood agreed to pay for High Line expenses was based on a fixed formula, which Stu did not
agret: to change as part of the City Ditch negotiations. Please give me Denver's position on this.
Otherwise, yow-revised language is okay with me except for two minor clarifications, one
in Section 2.1.2 and one in Section 2.4. I think they are self-explanatory. 1 am sending my changes,
made in pen, by accompanying fax. Please let me know if those changes are satisfactory to you, or
if you have concerns about them. If they are satisfactory, and if the High Line issue is resolved, can
you please send me a final document (or let me know, and I will have one prepared).
cc: Stewart Fonda
Director of Utilities
David G. Hill
, . SEP-30-2003 TUE 04:23 PM FAX NO.
63 .6 • Length of High Line in miles from High Line diversion dam to its
tenninus at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal turnout This distance is ex.oected to be reduced in the
future as Denver eliminates users who receive water from the High Line or Denver's operatio11s
change ma;· aaangt! Hl th~ itit1:1re Elependiag ea DeR~'er's aperaf:iees.
QH = Total annual High Line diversion, in acrewfect as measured at the
gage adjacent to Platte Canyon Reservoir.
QE = Total annual amount of Englewood water diverted or delivered
into the High Line, in acre-feet, as measured at the gage adjacent to Platte Canyon Reservoir .
CH .. The Board 1sDc11ver 's--_total annual costs for administration,
operation and maintenance of the High Line (based upon actual miles operated by Denver).
Eng lewood's proportional share of annual High Line costs.
II. CITY DITCH
2 .1 Deli veries to Denver .
2.1.1 Previous Delivery to Denver at Harvard Gulch Shall Not Be Macie. Under
theJ 995 Agreement, during the period of April l through October 31, inclusive , Englewood was
required to deliver to Denver through the City Ditch at Denver 's request up to 13 cfs of water at
Harvard Gulch (measured at the Washington Park flume ). Those deliveries shall no longer be
made .
('I ~y~ ()t ~-..c..
ake Fonner Deliveries at New Locations. Denver may require
Englewood to deliver, through e City Ditch, any portion of the 13 cfs' formerly deliverable at
Harvard Gulch to any existin contract user 's delivery structure or structures south of Harvard
Gulch for irrigation of parks , open space, and golf courses of Denver or its customers. Such
deliveries shall be in addition to the deliveries which Englewood is already required to make to
existing contract users south of Harvard Gulch. Such deliveries shall be made only during the
period April 1 through October 31. If Denver wishes to utilize new delivery structures south of
Harvard Gulch, Denver shall pay to Englewood the full cost of the construction of the new
delivery structures, whereupon delivery shall be made at the new delivery structures.
Furt:Asr11lore , DeR'+'er 9hall !'ay te Bag:lewood ~.Ihe cost of construction shall i..nclude-e!' any
temporarv improvements to the City Ditch which are necessary to maintain a-th~ existing ~
efcapaci tv of 25 cfs to the Allen Treatment plant ~wh i le construction of the improv~ments
necessary for the delivery of all or part of Denver's 13 cfs to new locations is taking place. If a
new delivery structure is to be built south of highway C-470, it must be designed so that it would
not conflict with an enlargement of the flume over Marcy Gulch or an cnlariiement of the
passageway under Highway C-470, and must be built downstream from the stilling basin.
Englewood shall pcrfonn the construction during periods when no interruption of flow will be
necessary.
4
P. 04
SEP-30-2003 TUE 04:24 PM FAX NO. P. 05
I calculated 011 the same basis as an existing contract user entitled to ieke t:fte atBet\at ef water~
whiee Deer,·er takes Eit:triag eaeB ea:leeeiar yefH'. Denver. or its contract desjgnee. will be invoiced -
after the end of each calendar year, the invoice to be payable in full 30 days from date of invoice. I ..P. l 4 /, "~,+t
,, ~~r> Englewood shall have the right to enforce payment, together with statutory interest and attorneys
fees incurred on account of delinquent payments; but failure to pay by Denver shall not result in
any son of reversion of Denver's City Ditch rights.
Denver will set fees, bill, receive and retain payment from contract users who divert from
City Ditch north of Harvard Gulch.
2.5 Right of Reversion or Acquisition. Denver retains the right of reversion as to any
contractual right for which an annual service charge is not paid by May 21 of any year. Denver
also retains the right to acquire any contractual right in the City Ditch. Except as to those
contracts that take water north of Harvard Gulch, any such reversion or acquisition shall increase
the amount of water which Englewood may be obligated to deliver to Denver pursuant to
Paragraph 2.1.2; provided that, Denver pays for delivery of such water as provided in Paragraph
2.4; and provided further, Denver is responsible for any improvements to the City Ditch required
to convey such water north of the turnout of the contract users which Denver acquires by
purchase or reversion. If Denver acquires contract inches which now divert south of Allen Filter
Plant for delivery north of the filter plant, then Denver will make such improvements, if
necessary , to prevent the diminution of the existing capacity (25cfs) to the Allen Filter Plant.
2.6 Denver's Sh.are of City Ditch Expenses. After 200 I, Denver shall no longer pay a
share of the expenses of operating and maintaining City Ditch south of Harvard Gulch, except
pursuant to Paragraph 2.4 .
2.7 Water Ri!Zhts . Englewood will divert on Denver's City Ditch priorities in order to
obtain the amount of water necessary for the deliveries to Denver and to the contract users other
than Englewood. Englewood will divert on its own contract rights for 3.21 cfs. Denver shall not
contest Englewood's claim of ownership by contract or otherwise to divert up to 3.21 cfs under
the:: senior priority of 30 cfs decreed to City .Ditch with an appropriation and priority date of
November 28. 1860 , as evidenced by decree of the District Court of Douglas County,
adjudicating water rights in former Water District 8, entered on December IO , 1883 . Englewood
has the reversionary right as the co-carrier only to its City Ditch contracts up to 3.21 cfs. Denver
does not warrant title to or the legal or physical availability of the 3.21 cfs claimed by
Englewood. (8ti~ P1m1gra:pe 2.2.l aeeve for EHglewoee 's oeligatioft Ee Rliflh"TliZ!!e ea.Priage
losses.)
2.8 Use of Impaired Capacitv . To whatever extent the carrying capacity of the ditch
is impaired for reasons beyond the control of Englewood, then the delivery capacity below the
obstruction shall be allocated first to carriage of Englewood's 3.21 cfs. Englewood shall take all
reasonable and practical actions to enable it promptly to resume full deliveries te Defl¥ef.
2.9 Use of Citv Ditch Excess Capacity. If Englewood determines the City Ditch has
excess capacity, then Englewood will deliver Denver's remaining City Ditch entitlement beyond
the 13 cfs pursuant to paragraph :2 .1.2; provided that, such deliveries do not interfere with
7
ATT. 7
VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN PROPOSALS
CONSULTANT VAS ERP TOTAL
Arcadis $10,950 $48,670
Pinkerton
$37,720
$15,300
$17,000
Did not meet requirements
ABS
Brown & Cauldwell/
Versar
Camp Dresser & McKee
$5,900
$29,000 $10,500
Carollo Engineers $40, 100 $10,900
(Additional Task 3 -Intrusion by TRC-EASi,lnc. + $9,000)
$22,900
$39,500
$27,000
$51,000
$60,000
VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN PROPOSALS
TECHNICAL EVALUATIONS
COMPANY
Arcadis
(3 proposals)
KICKOFF METING
SELECT TEAM
Did Centennial VA & ERP.
Develop Vulnerability strategy.
Agree on methodology.
Identify Core Team.
Pinkerton Team Assessment
( 1 VA proposal. No ERP) 2 day + 1 day for report
ABS
(Proposal)
Initial meeting 1 to 2 hrs .
Review overall project schedule
Brown & CauldweW Kickoff meeting
V ersar (3 proposals)
Camp Dresser &
McKee (5 proposals)
Carollo Engineers
( 6 proposals)
Preliminary data review .
Dave Pier. Mobilize team.
Organize project schedules,
CDM -Agenda & Minutes
Engl. -comments/minutes.
Carollo Team :
John Frasher, Jason Garside
Brad Einfield, Trc-Easi
Prioritize facilities.
Einfield not local
INTERVIEW SELECTED
STAFF
Assets and threats workshop .
SCAD A Assessment
Phys ical Assessment
3 days + 1 day report
Meet with select Eng .
representatives. Review plans and maps to
identify key facilities.
Site visit 1 to 2 hours .
Stakeholders+consultants meeting to discuss
major components and critical assets (5).
Additional info. on entire system.
Document firsthand experience + perceived
vulnerabilities. Confidential interview with
selected staff-CDM. Eng. -schedule
interviews .
Design basis that dictates risk reduction
measures . City staff included.
VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN PROPOSALS
TECHNICAL EVALUATIONS
COMPANY
Arcadis
(3 proposals)
CONDUCT SECURITY
AUDITS
Threats
SCADA Assessments.
VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS
TYPE OF METHODOLOGY
** VSAT is recommended for Englewood,
but they are trained in RAM-W also.
Pinkerton Engineering assessement Sandia Vulnerability Assessment
(1 VA proposal. No ERP) 3 days + 1 day for report process. *RAM-W
SNS would do SCADA Assessment.
ABS 1 to 2 hrs . to identify key
(Proposal) facilities and consequences .
Rank by importance.
Cyber system analysis. SCADA
Software . Caneras , building .
Brown & CauldweW Visit 5 critical sites & SCADA .
Versar (3 proposals) Meet with IT . Eva!. Current
baseline . Eva!. Detect delaying
features & responding feature .
Camp Dresser &
McKee (5 proposals)
Carollo Engineers
( 6 proposals)
SCADA -Eva!. but no testing .
Identify current vulnerability
& internal purposeful attacks.
External -visit key sites . Physical
assets. Internal -review
personal policies & procedures
With CDM . Security Audit Eng.
Inspect sites with Carollo
then with City team. Includes
review physical security and
of SCAD A System.
Risk Assessment methodology.
* RAM-W. Prepare draft -report.
Assist City in review and revise.
* RAM-W . Draft VA Report -
documents decisions. Describe
findings of site visit. Recommend
Upgrades & mitigation measures.
** VSAT -AMSA -combo.
Complete prelim. Vulnerability
Rankings based on audit
Interviews . CDM -Security audit
Recommendation & comments
& methodology for rank .
* RAM-W . Review risk
analysis of existing conditions .
Discussion of security improvements.
Recompute risk analysis.
* RAM-W can be expensive if you don 't ' follow reasonable measures and cost impacts. Could
be impractical results.
** VSAT recommended for systems less than 100 ,000 population.
VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN PROPOSALS
COMPANY
Arca dis
(3 proposals)
TECHNICAL EVALUATIONS
FACILITATE
WORKSHOP
COMPILE RESULTS
Total 5 workshops -6 to 8
hours each. Assets , threats,
SCADA, Vulnerability final.
PREPARE FINAL DRAFT
FOR VULNERABILITY
ASSESSMENT
Workship w/core members to finalize
V.A. 10 week project.
Pinkerton Didn 't mention workshops. 10 working days .
( 1 VA proposal. No ERP)
ABS Prioritize plan for security Draft VA , review & submit.
Assess various Cyber systems .
Advise on strengths & weaknesses.
(Proposal) upgrade . Draft VA, review .
Seems weak on meeting w/staff.
1 to 2 hour meetings .
Brown & Cauldwell/ Team will document decisions
Versar (3 proposals) describe findings of site visits.
Draft VA , review & submit final to
City. Feedback workshop to
discuss draft VA incorporated into
final.
Camp Dresser &
McKee (5 proposals)
Carollo Engineers
( 6 proposals)
Recommend upgrades including
Cost estimates .
Solicit City's staff input. Worshop Document results , set sound
with CDM experts & selected City prioritization path . Schedule
Staff. CDM revise security audit. For improvements , Draft final
Wkshop . minutes . Englewood report include City's
Comments on security Emerg. Operating Plan. and
recommendations . Submit to EPA.
Draft report submittal to
City . Reiview. Detailed
description of improvements.
Manufacturers & Equip. List.
Draft VA.
City comments .
Final report.
Submit to EPA.
VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN PROPOSALS
COMPANY
Arcadis
(3 proposals)
Pinkerton
ABS
(Proposal)
Brown & Cauldwell/
Versar (3 proposals)
Camp Dresser &
McKee (5 proposals)
Carollo Engineers
( 6 proposals)
TECHNICAL EVALUATIONS
PREP ARE DRAFT
AND FINAL ERP
6 week project.
Update ERP. City Review
Finalize Plan. Submit.
No submittal.
Reviewed Emerg. Response
Plan. Develop model ERP
Submit final ERP . Looks
Like 2 weeks after
Review existing City 's Emerg.
Response Plan. Conduct 2 hr.
Review threat analysis .
Submit final ERP.
Develop ERP. Submit to EPA.
6 mos. After VA. Incorporate
City 's Emerg. Oper. Plan.
City complete Letter of Certif.
Revise existing Englewood
Emerg . Oper. Plan to meet
new requirements.
QUALIFIED
TOTAL COST
Knowledge on Centennial &
Mclellan.
Yes .
$48 ,67 0 .
Weak system knowledge.
No
No ERP submitted.
Weak in system knowledge .
Yes
$22,900
Weak in system knowledge.
Strong consultation.
Yes
$39,500
Strong system knowledge.
Yes
$27,000
Medium system knowledge.
Yes
$51,000 -$60,000
'' c T y 0 F
September 24, 2003
The Honorable Ben Nighthorse Campbell
380 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington DC 20510
((Fax 303-228-4609)
Attention: James Dean
Dear Senator Campbell :
E N
ATT.
G L E w 0 0
I am writing in my capacity as the Director of U tilities for the City of Englewood and as a
Trustee of the American Water Works Association Research Foundation (AvvwaRF) to
let you know that representatives of AwwaRF will be contacting you and requesting a
meeting with regard to drinking water security research . I hope that your staff will have
time in their schedule to meet with them .
Over 900 water agencies throughout the world participate in AwwaRF 's research
subscription program that has in vested over $250 million in 700 research projects. This
includes $4.3 million in 29 drinking water security research projects, most done in
partnership with EPA, CDC , the Department of Defense and national laboratories
including Sandia and Lawrence Livermore . But the concerns over the security of our
drinking water supply and infrastructure far exceed AwwaRF's ability to fund this
research. We are interested in future partnerships that will allow us to leverage our
funding with that of the federal sector.
As the manager of a Colorado water utility, I am aware of the security concerns we have
for our utility and the concerns of my colleagues throughout the nation. The guidance we
seek would be for future funding partnerships for FY05 and beyond. I will very much
appreciate your meeting with the A wwaRF representative and sharing your thoughts with
them with regard to this issue .
Sincerely,
Stewart H. Fonda
Director of Utilities
City of Englewood
1000 Englewood Par kway En gl ewood, Colorado 8011 O Phone 303-76 2-2300
www .ci.e n~l ew ood .c o.u s
8
D
Denver Water does test for NDl\!IA
Re: "How safe is Chatfield's
water?" Sept. 21 editorial.
In response to The Post's edito-
rial about NDMA levels in Chat-
field Reservoir , Denver Water
would like to clarify a few points.
Denver Water currently tests
its treated drinking water for
NDMA !N-nitrosodimethvlamine )
using the most sensitive tests
available. These tests are per-
formed once a year along with
tests for hundreds of other "un-
regulated" contaminants. We cur-
rently use a contract laboratory
for the .\TOMA tests. and the de-
tection limit for these tests is 2
parts per trillion . Denver 's water
has been tested for NDMA for
the past two years. and results
have all been negative. Because
Chatfield was being considered
as a drinking-water supply
source in 2003. th ree samples of
Chatfield water were analyzed
for NDMA . The results of th ese
tests were negative, not surpris-
ing given the fact that NDMA
persists in groundwater . not sur-
face water. Chatfield Reservoir
is a surface water source.
Denver Water regards water
quality as its top priority . Ac-
cordingly , Denver Water dedi-
cates a significant amou nt of re-
sources to monitoring water
quality . Some parameters are
monitored continuously . Others
are monitored on a ·daily or
weekly basis to meet regulatory
requirements or Denver Water
standards. Finallv , contami -
nants that are very unlikely to
be detected. like NDMA , are
tested on a less frequent basis.
If Denver Water has reason to
believe that a contaminant
might be present. more frequent
testing is performed.
STEVE WORK, Director
Operations and Maintenance
Denver Water
... ~.--·.
A TT. 'I
' _, OCT-01-2003 WED 09:46 AH FAX NO.
COLLINS COCKREL & COLE
PAUL R. COCKREi.
JAMES P. COLL I~
~OB!RT G. COLe
TlMO'niY J, l'l YNN
l<RIST~N 0 . BEM
!VANO. ELA
HlilCI ANO!f!SON HUMSE~L
OAVIO S. O'\.!ARY
UNOA G. ALB<ANOER
David Hill, Esq.
Berg, Hill, Greenleaf & Ruscitti, LLP
Post Office Box 1719
Boulder, Colorado 80306
A PROFESSIONAL CO"PORAT10N
ATIOl'NEYSATLAW
390 UNION llOULEVARO, SUIT!! olOO
OENV!:,., COL.OAAOO eo221-1556
September 30, 2003
RE: Meeting Concerning 20 Acre-Feet, 1992 IGA
Dear David:
ATT.
TWl.~HON!
~15&1
800-35+5841
TeLEFAX
303-Glf.1755
!-MAIL
CCCMMOCCCFIRM .COM
VJAL'1AlL
This morning David Lorenz and I accepted an offer from Gary Sears to meet on October
8, 2003 along with you and Stu Fonda concerning negotiations associated with the 1992 IGA
between our respective clients. Since then, we have been notified that the October 8, 2003 date
has been cancelled, and instead a meeting can take place on October 16 , 2003 at 2:00 p.m. Mr.
Lorenz, Mr. Woodccck and I are available to meet on October 16, 2003 , if the October 13th
deadline stated in your letter of September 11 , 2003 is extended .
Please accept this letter as our agreement to meet with you, !vir. Fonda and Mr. Sears on
October 16 , 2003 at 2:00 p.m ., on the condition that Englewood's offer to South Suburban,
allowing South Suburban 's participation in the Englewood Golf Course Well, is extended to a
reasonable time after our meeting so that South Suburban may fully consider and respond to the
offer . Please give me a call to confirm.
Sincerely,
Evan D. Ela
cc: David A. Lorenz (via FAX)
South Suburban Park & Recreation District
Gary Sears (via F.4X)
Stu Fonda (via FAX)
EDE /jsf
ss~~il.4'1 ... nOOl L.au!tl
HiO 0...d rt-. o1zo l<IC-r...o..c
10
, . SEP-30-2003 TUE 04:23 PM FAX NO.
BERG Hn.L GREENLEAF & Rusarn llP
George v. Beii. Jr.
!mid G. Hill
Rjdwd F. GmaJaf
Cii09IDAi M. RlllCiai
ATTOR.NEYS & COUNSELORS AT LAW
1712 Pead Sczecr • Bould&r. Coloiado 10!02
Joa N. Bazwhek
M. Neal Hanna
Mciiua M. Hedman
lb I<ramicwia
Evan D. Ela, Esq.
Collins Cockrel & Cole, PC
390 Union Boulevard, Suite 400
Denver, Colorado 80228-1556
P.O. Bos 1719 • Bould.. Colorado 10306
Td: 303.402.1600 • Fu: 303.402.1601
September 30, 2003
Re: Englewood and South Suburban
Dear Evan:
P. 02
]oahA.Mam
Tbomu E. MenipD
Kacblc:m M. Morpa
]oMG.N..We
Heidi c. Poem
Suan Tyneil Rldwds
Jiilie S. Sdiocftfdd
Klin A. Tomer
In light of the meeting between Englewood and South Suburban concerning the 20 acre feet,
which is currently scheduled for October 16th, I have been instructed by Stu Fonda to advise you that
the last date for South Suburban to accept Englewood's offer has been extended to 5:00 P.M. MST
on October 31, 2003. The "offer" is the offer contained in my letter to you of September 11, 2003.
cc: Stewan Fonda
Director of Utilities
Sincerely,
David G. Hill
.. -.· ...... -. --..
ATI. II
CONNECTOR'S AGREEMENT
Sewer Contract No. -----
TS!S AGREEMENT, made and entered into t..~is 1st day of
October , xldi13 2003, by and bet.;een t..iie CITY OF
ENGL..c."'WOOD, COLORADO, a municipal corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "City," acting by and through its duly elected,
qualified and aut..1.orized Mayor and City Clerk, and SOUTH ENGLEWOOD
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 I a quasi-municipa l corpo:-at:.on
of t.."le State of Colorado , hereinafter called "District," acting
by and t..~rough its du~y aut~crized Beard of Directors;.
WITNESSETII
WEZRE.AS, the City owns and operates a sewage system,
includ~ng a sewage treat~ent pla.."lt whic~ is jointly owned and
operated with the City of Littleton, so situated pcysically as to
be able to receive ar.d treat the sewage gat:~ered by the District;
and
~!",.;'~~~'s ;• ;s r~Q des;~~ o~ t~e Dis--i c• ro u~~1 iz= the n.i.-•~ I • .__ • -·-----•• -'----------•
facilities owned by t..~e City for the trea-::Uent of sewage and t:-ie
City is willing to serve t..1.e District for treat~ent o: sewage
under ce=tain conditions;
NOW, ~REFO~, I~ CONSIDERAT!ON of t..~e promises a..'i.d for
ct:~er geed and valuable consideration hereina:ter set forth, it
is ~utually agreed by t..~e par-:.ies as follows:
l. T~e City he~eby ag=ees ~~de= the cor.c~~~or.s cerei~a=te= set
fa=-:~ to treat t~e sewage o=igi~ati~cr ===~ Oist:-ic~'s
Sa -.-~.,.... s~'·'e""' s·rs7'0 m p.;•·-~.., t ·..,= a-=~ se_-,·0_,..._ "~1 ·~e ni-~-.;r--··----:1 ;///I ----'9---·-..i.• ··----..,_ "-·-J.J_,::, ____ .._
as a;9=oved by t..~e City, as i~dicatec ~~ ~~e desc=i;tions
a~~ac~ed hereto ~a=ked ~x..~ibit A.
Distric~ s;eci=ica:ly ag=ees to p=eve~~ se~age frcm a~y ~rea,
C -~=--~ar ~~a-~~---i~ed ~0 -0 .;.., T"--~ ~e;-g d i -c~a ... -e,... i~-~ '-··--'---.... -·--~-:::i'---.-.,.;. ____ ,.., __ ....,!!l -~.... -~ .... -'-:1 -•• ._...,,
i".; ___ .; __ ,s sa_,i .. :::a-· se'·'a,...Q s··s·0 ~ .-~,..-ec-"",..; .... ,.., l"'-i -·;'s t--.J~:C -"'-~-----··----.: "' ""='-i ·---"" "-'--...:.. __ ,_ '-"""" ---... -.. _
2.. .:.::e a::C. -:.= 9::-:"t~::-: c:;n:?.ec-:icns '== -::;.e s~·s~=:i :::-~m or i~ a:!y
a=ea ot~e= t~a~ ~~~se Cesc=i~ed ~e=::~.
See Foot:!ote last page.
-,
2. In the operation of District's sanitary sewer system,
District agrees that all applicable Code provisions and rules
and regulations of City, including amendments thereto during
the ter:n of the contract, shall be the minimum standards for
District's system. · District fur':her agrees to abide by all
applicable state and federal laws, rules, regulations, or
per.nits, including those of the Environmental Protection
Agency (the EPA) as they become effective or implemented or
upon notice from the City. District shall inform all users,
contractors and subcontractors of such standards, rules and
regulations upon inquiry from such persons, and shall not
furnish any infer.nation inconsistent therewith. In this
regard, it shall be t.~e responsibility of the District to
obtain from the appropriate governing body the applicable
requirements. The City shall attempt to maintain and provide
all requirements to the District; however, City does not
guarantee the accuracy or completeness of gover~.menc
regulations other than the City's own regu_ations.
3. The City's per:nitting rec;:uirements stall be follcwed by the
District and its users. A:l plans , s~eci:ica~ior.s and
me ~ .. ads o.: '"'or 1' •. ,~ ... ..., ~ n .... e n · --~ .... ::, 1 1 b ··· ~ --~ · -.,..., ~...,e -·· .l.. ... ·'" ·"'-'-··-~ '-·· ..,J..s1.. __ c_ s •. a__ e s:.:;:im_ .. __ a. '-"' '-··
Ci~y in writi~g and approved by City prier to a~y
const~~ction er ta= in t~e District 's a==roved a=ea. No . . .
pe:r:nit shall be fir.al a::d no se:-:1ice sta:l be provided to
property until cons~=uction is approved in writi::g :Oy City.
4. Dist=ict shall, at all ti:nes, orooerlv mai:i.tain its sewer
Sys-'-om anc." sha'1 roe•~~ .• any -~~~:o . C'"'nd~-~ons w·nich '--• ..:.-----:..:: •. t--.... ...,J.._::ns or ...,, ..:.1.._ . -•
have been dete.r:nined bv District or Citv to be de-i:=i:nental to
Ci tv' s t=eat:ner.t orocess. Should t:"1e cl t·; deter::iine that anv
discharge enters the sewer syste::n contra=Y to gcverning laws:
0 .... .-,; ... a..,c'""S s•,,.-·1 '°"0 S -·1 0 s ro,-.il ;:i-~ons or oe.__,~-::: D i s~--ic~
---·• •• <;; I ------I "----I --:i-----& -• _ _. ___ , -----
agrees to proceed at once to take wtateve= law~~l means may
be necessa.:-1 to rectify any s~ch ~roble::n er cor.dition.
5. City shall have t~e right to allcca-:e se.:-~ice under this
contract, and City may deny additional se~1ice fer any
utility-related reascn, but in nc event will Ci':y ter:ninate
any se!'Vice without cause. City s~all have the right to
disconnect se.:-1ice to any area annexed bv District when such
an,..ex::>t i on ~"'k~s C ,"'C 0 w~t~o··----~~r ~~~:~on c;-~ accrcv::>1
... --'"--4 ------....... _ ~--'-"-,,, _____ ... --.. -----·
6.
District shall provide Ci:.v within cne vea= o: t::is -. .
ag=ee::ne!'lt, a:l es-:i:na-:e c: the m::n..::er o: e:::i..:ivale::-: service
t "' .... S ...,e 0 ~ed .:c.,.. ··-0 nex-'-:~ ve ( -) y ... · ·~e-c·•---0 ,..t zoni ncr -::-.. _1.,;, :.. -'-··-• -.:....:. :J ea_s t::! ..... -----·· -~
a:ld p:anned build.cut in District's area. Dist=ic-: shall
mcr.i~or zcning changes within its a=ea to esti~ate its tap
recuirements a::d c:-cvide Ci t·r •,.;i t:1 :1otice of ta;: requirements
fo; t~e nex-: five· year ;:eri.od c: ti:ne i:: a for:i satisfac"tor-1
t:: t:1e Ci :.y. Notice of these req-..:ire:;ne:-.:.s stall be given
Ci:.y on eac~ a::::iversa~; date c: t:::s ag=ee~ent.
C-i -_~/ :n~·_; i:n~cs~ ~~~ c-~l oc• ... oa--~I ~ ---·~-a~~ _ c;.-. -!"" c;; ~6.i....;. ....., ___ -__ _:Jlt.,,,,r..a __ : .. e::~, 1...---::i ... ~
cha=;es, which sha:l be un:for:n as t~ a~: outside-City users
-2 -
for t..~e services provided by t..~e City under this Connector's
Agreement.
City shall bill District user directly for all applicable
City charges ·for services rendered under this Agreement.
Should any user not pay City, City shall bill District and
District shall pay to City within 45 days of such billing the
a.mount due. These charges are subject to adjustment from
time to time by City; when such charges are changed, City
shall give District forty-five (45 ) days advance written
notice.
7. The ter.n of this Agreement is for a period of three (3) years
from the date of execution and automat i cally renewed for six
(6) subsequent three-(3)-year periods unless either party
gives a minimum. of six months written notice, during which
time District agrees that all effluent produced from taps
within District shall not be in violation of any federal,
state or City laws, rules or regulations, or any other
applicable gover:unental regulations er the per:ni ts under
which the City operates its sewage treat~ent system. City
agrees , during t h e ter:n hereof, to treat said ef=luent and to
maintain adequate faci l ities for trea~ing of the same.
8. District agrees that it will maintai~, at its own expense ,
all of its lines , or these lines new owned and operated by
District, it being speci=ical l y agreed that City asswnes no
responsibil i ty should any of District 's lines become clogged,
damaged, or require maintenance. D ~strict shall maintain
24-hour service to remedy disr~ption in service. District
shall, i= it deems necessary, noti=y its users of District's
procedure to remedy se.:·vice.
9. City is providin g only sewage treat~ent service ar.d, pursuant
thereto, pe!.":D.its inciden~al use of Ci~y's sewage lines only
by this individu al contract with District and does not, by
this cont=act, offer t=eat~ent serv:ce excect in strict
accordance with the ter:ns hereof. This contract does not
offe=, and shall net be construed as offering, sewage
treat~ent service to t..~e public gene=all y or to any area
outside the li:nits of t~e Dist=ict's se=vice a=ea herein
desc=ibed.
10. This cont=act ma y not be ass:gned, sc:.d or transfe==ed by
District w:thout c:~y's '~it~en conse~~.
ll. Shculd any federa: law , ~..::e, pe~it er regulation or should
a decree or cr~e= of a ccurt render vc:d or unen==r=eable any
provisions of this ccr.tract , in whole or in pa=t, if
pcss:=ie, t~e re~ainder stall be of f~ll fcrce and effect.
l ~ ~~Qr ~-~-~~~ s~~~, e-·~p-e ~~;--t -d Q~c~ o• i~-..:. · -··-'-'-=-'----'-•----·•-'-'--'--~-=> ag_ee:nen a.. --.. ---=-
te~s a~d concitic ns w:tiin t~e a=ea described in Ex..~ibi~
"A. " D ist::-ict. sta:.l :=-e:·..:se to se:-re a user or potential
user, disconnect t~e ser-1ice of any user pursuant to
-J -
appropriate law, or take other appropriate action in the
event of:
a. Nonpayment by such user of any charge made by City for
services;
b. Any violation or noncomp li ance by such use::-with the
terms of this agreement;
c. Violation or noncompliance by such user with the laws,
rules, permits or regulations of the City, the United
States government, including the EPA, the State of
Colorado, including the Department of Health, or other
law, rule, permit or regulation applicable.
d. Continued breach of t..~is Agreement by the District
and/or its users shall be considered cause for the City
to terminate this Agreement.
Should the District fail to promptly rectify a breach of
those provisions identified herein, after notice thereof,
City may take such steps and de s~ch work as it deems
necessary to enforce this agreement, including litigation and
specifically a righ~ to injunction er s~ecific perfor:nance
against the District or any of its user~ as is necessa.=y to
protect the City's system and cpe:-ations. T::e p:-eva:.l.ing
party shal l be entitled to expenses and costs of suit,
including attor~ey fees. Shou:d mc:-e than one Dist::-ict be
connected to a sewer line, all Districts on the line shall be
jointly and severally liable for anv breach of this agreement
and each such District shall inunedi~tely, after notice,
rectify any problem or condition detrimental to the treat::nent
process arising within its lega: bcu..,da=ies. City stall not
be required to prove which Distr:ct is at fault but shall
make available to all such a:fected Districts all in!or:nation
developed or accu:nulated by Ci':y pertaining to such breach.
Nothing contained he=ein stall oreclude a clai::n for indemnity
or contribution by any District-against another District
connected to a common sewer line. C~S-13-31-111.5 shal l
gover:l the percentage of liab:2.itv
common sewe= li!1e in the event. the
1 .. '1.. • • 1' ia~i-~:.y oasec upon neg_~gence or
o: ar.y District on a
City seeks to impcse
fault.
13. T~is ccntract s~all net be useC. as a legal defer:se or
pr=hibition to t~e ::nandatcr1 ccr:sclidaticn cf facili':ies by
eit~er party as may be re~lred bv t~e laws of t~e State cf
Colorado cf all existi~g sewer cc:lecticn systems and
fac.:lities to a gover:uner:tal e~ti:..,-createC. to assll::ne
-0 s-cns ; ..a· ; 1 ; •y "'o ..... se'·' ..._ -.; ,,,.. ,·.. •· --,·..., .. h.; .-r.i ,,._c ... ~ --!:" -___ .._ --.. e_ se_ 1_._e _:i ... .:ie a_ea -·· 'N~-~--·-..-1..._
Ci:.y and sta:.e are a part u~der s:.at~tcry or ccr.s~it~ticnal
aut~critv as ::nay be the case.
-4 -
A'r!'EST: CITY or ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
City Clerk Mayor
ATTEST: "DISTRICT"
By~~
Benjamin L. Olsen, Secretary
ay /'7~4-V~
Eugene F. Dunham, P.resident
** Footnote (see paqe l)
Nothinq in this paraqraph shall apply to flows entering the
outfall line utilized by the District at any point on points
downstream from where the said outfall line leaves the area of
the District.
-5 -
. ~ . ~
. E
.. ··. . .
:· :. .
• !· ~ · •. . •. · ...
. -.·
.. .:.. . . . -~. . . . .. . .. "
.. ·~-~ ......... ;.:;.:~ .... ·. :~: · ... ·:· .... ... ·.: .. -· .
~-.-.9:> .:·.~AN ..
.. ·._; .. :::.:::...~.-~.·.~: ·. '.: .~:·_~ . !• . ,. .· ... ·.:··
~~Q.. lcr LJaJE
~PEimE£-.S.U711
·'
S L.DG E. ~·LJ..1.h ME'
.. . · .• ,· ..
.'~-~~-==~oo=----=~~=-=-~-=-~-~~~
........ ~.~;;: ;;!: ::ZS
·_._.: ~iiTl./ p/G~) SAllilA1JC)/ ~1577?/criVo-~
iE~u)l})M{ /'/#
~ f,i//ou; ~~-W~..t ~ ..Jlfi,i?.;cr
-/r;s .'4#e/' A~s.B S'-!e c-td
/,,
/'~
.. ..... .$; .
r
I ., •
. : ·~ ..
• ,, ..
..
~: ..
~~ (2c;..Q.. LC"I LiN/E ~ -
Wt:s> ~ ~~
, ..
.. .. ·.;
. j·· .: · ..
EXHIBIT II A II
.••··,
3. ~ta.•\.
s ... !" .. ,..,..
}1U2$!ie./, <! I
I
I
i
i
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I r:
i
l
Route Number __ O=-· _2_-_3-.J-f_· ___ _
(!}c__T LJ3
Address Location
I::
I 35 5\ ('. "t:,n.-~"-1"_ \.-~+
~ 3'9 35
,,...
, r. l'..c ... J:. -.;).
I
'-117{ S. I
I
L{-"'Rq °"-'· S.
Y 21 2. ~
.J
'-i :)Ci <; ·.
~l~t S.
'-{ :) '-t ·(, , ....
~),
11-zs; '\
'-{fro ,1
..) .
·~r k
~ ,,~ck
~( -
t ~ .. --
F..::iJ(
C k"r:> I
s.t-
st
a ·.
u i i\
rJ ct 'J .";l.
i
7 ' .
I
<:"° I'-'
s . C-k "' -&'s "I c..J (. '3 I ..::.-
~'IJ ~ 7 ' l (' 0-
39S1 'S,
3f552 <s~ I
t.( I,.,)
y03i
,,.,£,
oqs ~
<-//YO ..-
.) ' j)p '
\
Q ~
Last Read This read
Lj S(:t;:
//30
w
{_.
15;.s
c_il 8
75
IZ\5 3 i'-1
(055
' 90~
MEMO
TO :
FROM:
DATE :
RE:
John Bock, Utilities e/J . ,
{ l_ . . . . t Nancy Reid, Assistant City Attorney • 1
October 6, 2003
Request for a Response to the "Agenda Items " Numbers 5, 6, 7 and 9
Proposed by Heibel
The City of Englewood is a home rule city and as such is subject to and governed by the charter
and ordinances of the City rather than State Statutes .
bb
October 5, 2003
Tom and Trudy Heibel
4020 S. Elati Street
Englewood, Co 80110
Phone: (303) 910-8080 Fax: (303) 761-4083
Re: Tom and Trudy Heibel Water Board Agenda
Our agenda for the next water board meeting consists of the following:
1) Reducing our quarterly payment down to an average that is consistent
with prior quarterly bills
2) Getting an answer to why our water bill was increased to a level that
clear ly was never achieved
3) Getting an answer to why our water meter was removed (without our
permission), dismantled and then thrown away . ,;r
4) Getting an answer to why we could not keep our water meter, which 1 C ~;)1 ~[.,: "' r is property of the homeowner. rJ. cfr~-t1 -
{£)Receiving a copy of the request by the Englewood Water Board to the ;~/
State Public Utilities Commission that outlines the rate increase that (
!:. has been affected on our water bill. J/fl·'/,~l ~l -~ Receiving a copy of all notices (in compliance with C.R.S. 40-3-104 rt rr f /-"-
paragraph A thru D, Section I) clearly outl ining the change in effective 101
<'... ;
~ rate for our home.
~ 7)) Establishing an understanding as to why we have been denied many 1 1 ~ basic rights as outlined in C. R.S. 40-3-104 and who is responsible.
8) Why we are being denied access to our water meter for billing
fu, purposes. 0 Why the City of Englewood has violated C.R.S. 37-97-103 subsection
2.
State of Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency
Division of Drinking and Ground Waters
March 1996
Fact Sheet
Nitrate and Nitrite in Drinking Water
What are nitrate and nitrite? Nitrogen is an es.5ential component of agricultural fertilizers.
During heavy rains, some of this nitrogen runs off farm fields into streams, rivers, and lakes,
where it reacts with water to fonn nitrate. Public drinking water supplies are required to monitor
the level of nitrate and nitrite in the water because of the potential health threat to infants llllder
six months of age .
What level of nitrate or nitrite is considered "unsafe"? Elevated levels of nitrate or nitrite in
drinking water pose no threat to the majority of people. Even when there is a "nitrate or nitrite
advisory" in effect , all but infants under six months of age can safely drink the water.
However, when the average of two analyses shows concentrations of nitrate which exceed 10
milligrams per liter, or nitrite which exceed 1 milligram per liter, public drinking water suppliers
are required to notify their customers to provide infants under six months of age an alternate
source of water for drinking or the preparation of formula or foods.
Based upon information available to Ohio EPA, fetuses, pregnant women, or nursing mothers are
not at risk from drinking water containing elevated levels of nitrate . However , Ohio EPA
recommends that persons under medical care or who feel they are at risk contact their physician.
Why are infants the only group at risk? Nitrate is essentially harmless. However, the
alkalinity of the gastro-intestinal tract of infants under six months of age is high enough to permit
certain kinds of bacteria to reside in the digestive tract These bacteria change the nitrate into
nitrite. a much more hannfu1 substance. The nitrite then enters the bloodstream, where it can
restrict the blood's ability to provide oxygen to the body. This condition , known as
methemoglobinernia or "blue baby syndrome," can be fatal .
What precautions should be taken by someone at risk? Substitute bottled water for tap water
until the nitrate or nitrite advisory is lifted. Boiling tap water will not get rid of the nitrate or
nitrite; it only concentrates them. Nor should you rely on water purification systems to remove
the nitrate or nitrite. It is safe to bathe or shower in tap water, however.
Can drinking water be treated to remove nitrate or nitrite? Yes, however, it is a very
expensive process. Therefore, it usually is not practical for the individual homeowner to install
treatment
For more information: Call Ohio EPA's Division of Drinking and Grmmd Waters at
614 .644.2752.
LIST PREVIOUS METER READING (INFORMER)
·)J
. \~ (fl-i\""' ~
S,v.)l'l
LAST ... .
ACCT ...... . LAST ... READ ... .
READ.NO ... NO ........ . CON p DATE ... .
0062097000 04042026900 153 08/04/03
0054139000 04005021099 1 153 07/02/03
0063113000 04034008006 1 154 08/05/03
0022095500 01009028288 1 154 09/03/03
0090384003 01008048916 1 155 08/20/03
0063273000 03011047408 1 156 08/07/03
0092116000 01002046962 1 156 08/08/03
0093050000 30160044905 1 157 08/06/03
0065182000 03005049704 1 158 08/05/03
0065114000 03004049607 1 159 08/05/03
_ .. jl _ tL _________ o 0_9J_lQ3-.0. o Q ___________ J_.6_Q..7.Q _Q QJJ 8 o EL ___ __L ___ ?.1£__ 16 o o filQ_'ZJfil___. ____ _
-----· J./ _ -QQ24l56-QQ;3-___ ·-· Q _2Q:L1Q2.:21~~---· 1 111
162 09/07/03
___ J____Q_Q~30-7.10Q _O _;3f)094000334 ;L __ '11
_ ·--·---·· l_f:2;,3 _____ Q.6_/_QQ}_Q3
7 N oo .71094001 01005040500 1 Jf(' 164 ___ ... o .9L0_1_/_Q_~/~1<>5:l _s-·~,.,tJ
1 . N 0020190040 01006033328 1 3f~I '' 165 ...... 0 .9/_Q.3/Q3./:J.-&"3'J.5 . .'-P~(lo.1-
__ L _J'L. ____ o 0 93 07 Q 0 QO ····-... 3 6.0 94 Q Q 0 .3 .56 ________ J _______ I :' _____________ 16 5 08 /06 / 03
_ji_ ____ .}J __ QQ93069QOO 36094000414 ... l __ I 1
1
_. ____ .• l6 7 _______ Q8 ,__/~0 ~6 ,__/~0 =-3 ____ _
~--{' . ---~----Q o ~ ~ p_~-~ o Q Q ________ ) 6_Q_.9 4 Q .9 Q o_;; g _________ J ___ 311/ '' _____________ J_:Z.~----·---.P 8~/-"-o-'-7 ~/-"-o-=-3 ~----
----··--N _ .. _ o o 2. 5 o 7 loo o o 2oo2o1!?2 o 9 ... 1 :3/1" __________ l7 4 ________ ~ i.JL..2..1o3/,,!Jz, i:. Goi11mo'f
4-1 JJ QJ16_3JlliQ_Q.Q ___ o 3 _QJ2.o 4 _7 1. Q~ _______ J, ___ 3 _ ,.l'.~ _____ __i_7 6 o 8 ;_ru_ o 3 ____ _
{I ~ ______ Q.Q9~_Qfil.Q_Q.Q_ _ _l§_1.22.Q _LQ.Q1 _1 ____ J ____ f _~: .. _____________ J_7_7 ______ ...Q e.Lo6 Io 3
( rJ 0024185003 OJ 023031680 1 JN '' 177 Q9/07L03{:31t..&S .Y.:-c,K ~~L1iM. .. __ o o 3 414 1 o o o o 3 o o 4 o 4 o 2 o 5 1 "3/1 '' 177 _ . ___ .. o 1 /_16. I =o 3=-,------,----
N 0 0 9 023 6 0 03 01006 04 8 0 08 1 -~N 11 181 08 / 0 9 / 03/il8 oo~.:feid.d
-} tJ o o 9 3 o 2 2 o o o 363l_looo14 6 1 i 11 18 2 o 8 o 6 o 3
~ N 0065010001 03003044550 1 5/8 11 183 08 05 03~1 !i:5:>.'llJo r~
Jf,/ 11 .o I ...., 1,......., L..""·,. . ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~----~~-~-~-~~~-~~~i·----·i --3Ffi 1 ____ -----i~~-==~6~-~~~~~~A)
. t JJ --·-----006 311 OOQl ~~=o4 o_i _4o 6 .2 .Q-~i ~--_j~~ .. -~_)Ja.:·, _---. .HH _________ Q.8./ 0 5 / 03/qoc \)) <..bittJ
tJ 0093 01 7001 3 6311000044 1 l/ 185 08/96-/ QJ -------
N 00900-iio-03--·--oioo4047208 1 aN 1
' 186 00/09/03folnc ~·.1v)O:ri
tJ o o 9 3 1 QlO o o 3 o 16 Qfil.25..Q 2 1 5 /a " ______ 18 6 o .aL-=o--"-7_,_L-=o-=3 -,.--___ _
'(,' N 0061140001 464930336~4 1 5/~/' 188 08L04/03@:3U~l61tb1ali:i 'joJ
i' tJ 009303_~_9 .. QQ ___ }Q _lf?OQ46605 ;L . I '1
. 188 08/0g/{)J --·-·--------
_1__1{ ___ 0_07_01.8 ~ o o o . o 1oo3 o ~ 9 ~ 3 7 _ . _ .L :~~~r ...... . 18 ~ . o '?I Q]_i_o3]JJJJs.<J,.,.Vl r
--'.il ,J o o 9 3 o 51oo0 ________ ;3-o 1 ~-.Q Q .1-4-.~ Q _~----_i ___ .. Y1,.11· ___ --··· _ JJ~9 ___ ... _o.a!.u.6...LO~----
-----~ .... Q036-0~J.QQQ 36Q940Q0367 1 1;/ ,/ 189 oe/o .~LQ3
tJ 0 093 056 0 0 0 3 6210 0 08 010 1 3;-1'1 18 9 08/ 01:)/ Q _~---------
,.J o o 2 212 o 5 5 o __ __Q_~Q.Q 4oQ2s1_1 _ 1 1 " 18 9 o 9 Io 3 Io 3
0093016000 36311000022 1 190 08/06/03
0093118001 30240036413 1 . 193 08/07/03
0093054000 30160044009 1 195 08/06/03
0021260000 01004030872 1 200 09/03/03
=\N 006317474 7 03 o 08 04 77 05 1 ... , -.11'' 2 03 08/ 06 / 03/'i'17e S. J~tl
0093053000 30160044304 1 203 08/06/03
0093019000 36311000066 1 204 08/06/03
0093110000 30200037374 1 209 08/07/03
0093030000 36311000011 1 209 08/06/03
___ 1_~ ____ .. __ 0065i4~0 _QJ . 0300504475? _. ___ l _ ~~II 210 _Q~/_Q _~_/Q~/~L\_~~-~t~----·-
0093087000 36094000163 1 214 08/07/03
0036079000 36152009759 1 215 08/08/03 .
__ i~ ___ _Q __ 9~;32~5000 03011049254 1 o\>11
' 215 08/07/03)ll..qj'fJ $.kll~~-
0093074000 36094000276 1 219 08/06/03
LIST PREVIOUS METER READING (INFORMER)
ACCT ...... .
READ.NO ... NO ........ .
0024160003 02011021111 J_y ___ _QQ~Q~2909Q . ----QiQQ703-1394
t ~ 0024169003 02010023031
0093046000
0093081000
0093090000
0025080500
0093068000
0093072000
0093075000
0093060000
0063001000
0093023000
0093086000
0093044000
0093077000
0093059000
_}) ______ 0022201001
0054152000
0093049000
0093088000
0070064010
0093078000
0093084000
0093065000
0093089000
0036082000
0093091000
0093062500
0036083000
0092077030
36230009049
36094000210
36094000119
02000010306
36094000389
36094000312
36094000254
36152013010
04035000010
36311000168
36094000152
36230008024
36094000040
36152014012
01009031974
04005023571
36230010015
36094000083
01001040440
36094000232
36094000141
36094000287
36094000061
36094000378
36094000108
36152009001
30240036800
02036002503
243 records listed.
CLASS
CODE.
1
l,
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
LAST ...
CON SUMP
225
~30
233
2 38
239
241
244
245
249
251
255
257
258
266
272
274
277
296
303
324
325
3 2 7
361
371
378
386
394
396
509
791
1962
09:38:58
LAST ... .
READ ... .
DATE ... .
09/07/03
o ;i Io~ Io 3 .. 2/:)_ 9.-5.::;__Y:!.!J __ s 11 __ _
09/07 /03 J.3o _"j£ Vttirm <!_~~T lf_
08/06/03
08/06/03
08/07/03
09/09/03
08/06/03
08/06/03
08/06/03
08/06/03
08/04/03
08/06/03
08/07/03
08/06/03
08/06/03
08/06/03 .
09 / 04 I 03 3 t 9 '1 :.t;~ !'!..~{)u
-0'!./Q~/Q~_Jjl.'Z tu {)JJ!if~/ ·-LEA--k
08/06/03 I
08/07/03
o 9 I 04 I 03 i./"'/f/ f J ~!'Jw('',J._
08/06/03
08/07/03
08/06/03
08/07/03
08/08/03
08/07/03
08/06/03
08/08/03
08/08/03
t t l3Jt~ 1,.wtw.~\ f~·, s-o V'l~ ·hwie \:.,..v-~c::Z /ri-;;·r 'l-v•s
~: {)l,4\JQ \-'\ll"t"""\~ \:'q 6\ ... w..._ h...,...t.1.. \w"""' e.. l~H t 9.-l/"6 •
N :< ~(,)'\..'>,/'A""' \,. \='c.'t :5'C•'IM e.. t\'v'A<2 ~"" '11\h Q_ l <.) ~ t '].~Y's
LIST PREVIOUS METER READING (INFORMER)
.)J
)
( (liV'' ~
5,v.) ~
LAST ... .
ACCT ...... . READ ... .
READ.NO ... NO ........ . DATE ... .
~--03004040205 1 "3/4" 177 _____ Q]f1Qf.0'-"3,__,__ ___ _
N 009023 6 O 03 O 1006 04 8 O 08 1 ·3/-.J" 181 O 8 / O 9 / 03U/8oos.1v4.d
ii,.; 0093022000 36311000146 1 i " 182 08706703
t-1 0093101000 30160037502 1 ~m" 186 00Lo7Lo3
'ii t-i 0061140001 46493033664 1 5/s " 188 08Jo4/03@:3Uwfl11&1aJt:J'foJ
_:i'. tJ 009303 _~_Q_QQ ______ )QJ§OQ46605 1 I '1 188 . Of3/Q§_/QJ __________ _
_i _ _t{ _________ QQ _7Q1~90QO O:I-003039237 1 ;~f '' 188 9'?./Qfj_jQ"J/filfSCJ,· .. l<F
_j{___H _ 0093051000 ______ JQ1§.QQ1 .1 _~Q~-------J , ____ :Jt "l
1
' 16~. ----_08/Q.6_/_QJ>O<--------
----~ .... -66~~-6~~~~6 ~~~~~66~~~~ ~ ~(;~: ~~~ 0010 ~/QJ __ 1 -o 0 I o §I g ~--__ _
-~N-~0~0=2212os50
0093016000
0093118001
_ t}! ______ _
0093054000
0021260000
0063174747
0093053000
0093019000
0093110000
0093030000
0065143001 . --· -.. --· ·---· ··~ -·
0093087000
0036079000
__ i\l ______ _Q __ Q E? ~ ~ ~ 5 0 0 0
0093074000
0 2 _Q_Q 4 0 0 9 5 13
36311000022
30240036413
30160044009
01004030872
03008047705
30160044304
36311000066
30200037374
36311000011
03005044755
36094000163
36152009759
03011049254
36094000276
1 i ,,
1
1 .
1
1
1 .. , ... lf'
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
189
190
193
195
200
203
203
204
209
209
09/03/03
08/06/03
08/07/03
08/06/03
09/03/03
o 8 Lo 6 Lo 3/ ~'77c s. JtJcn
08/06/03
08/06/03
08/07/03
08/06/03
2~0 -· -. _ 98/Q2_/Q~/i1~1~~ i_fq'i ___ _
214 08/07/03
215
215
219
08/08/03 .
o 8 Io 7 Io 3)'\'11fJ $. ~~~-
00/o6/o3
LIST PREVIOUS METER READING (INFORMER)
ACCT ...... .
READ.NO ... NO ........ .
0024160003 02011021111
__t~_Q_04Q~~ Q 9Q_Q _______ Q.1=9 Q7 0313 94
t ~ 0024169003 02010023031
0093046000
0093081000
0093090000
0025080500
0093068000
0093072000
0093075000
0093060000
0063001000
0093023000
0093086000
0093044000
0093077000
0093059000 J ________ 0 022;20:1-001
0054152000
36230009049
36094000210
36094000119
02000010306
36094000389
36094000312
36094000254
36152013010
04035000010
36311000168
3609400015 2
36230008024
36094000040
36152014012
O;l..009031974
04005023571 -------~----·-····· --. -. -. ·--
0093049000
0093088000
0070064010
0093078000
0093084000
0093065000
0093089000
0036082000
0093091000
0093062500
0036083000
0092077030
36230010015
36094000083
01001040440
36094000232
36094000141
36094000287
36094000061
36094000378
36094000108
36152009001
30240036800
02036002503
243 records listed.
CLASS
CODE.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
LAST ...
CONS UMP
225
__ ;2JQ
233
238
239
241
244
245
249
251
255
257
258
266
272
274
277
296
303
324
325
327
361
371
378
386
394
396
509
791
1962
. ' '
09:38:58
LAST ... .
READ ... .
DATE ... .
09/07/03
o ~Io 3-J Q_J ___ ~/;j__9_s_,~_JJJ ~s t1 __ _
09/07 /03 J3o3E'!?t-P!~~~:.-ni_
08/06/03
08/06/03
08/07/03
09/09/03
08/06/03
08/06/03
08/06/03
08/06/03
08/04/03
08/06/03
08/07/03
08/06/03
08/06/03
08/06/03 '
09/04/03 319'J .~. 6n.v liOV _ _ ___ ci: ~ 6 ~-) ~ j -2i2.7. k, . ~--;{.-;;.-LE l~K
08/07/03
o 9 Io 4 I o 3 1-1" 1/f/ f . t!!<Jt" (,.; ___
08/06/03
08 /07/03
08/06/03
08/07/03
08/08/03
08/07/03
08/06/03
08/08/03
08/08/03
•
LIST PREVIOUS METER READING (INFORMER)
\1
,_ ( (1-iV"' ~
5,v.)~
LAST ... .
ACCT ...... . LAST ... READ ... .
READ.NO ... NO ........ . CON p DATE ... .
0062097000 04042026900 153 08/04/03
0054139000 04005021099 1 153 07/02/03
0063113000 04034008006 1 154 08/05/03
0022095500 01009028288 1 154 09/03/03
0090384003 01008048916 1 155 08/20/03
0063273000 03011047408 1 156 08/07/03
0092116000 01002046962 1 156 08/08/03
0093050000 30160044905 1 157 08/06/03
0065182000 03005049704 1 158 08/05/03
0065114000 03004049607 1 159 08/05/03
__ ~-.tL ______ o o 9.3.1-0 _3._ao_a _______ ____3_.6_Q _7_QQ_QJJ8 o 8 1 '.![{'_1
______ l_Q__Q__ __ _QfilSJ.~7-+--/~0 ~3 _____ _
______ t-/ _____ QQ.2-41..5-6.QQ~-----·--· Q~O.ll Q ~~J E2~ ____ 1 _J ''___ 162 09/07 /03
__ J_Q..Q ~ 3 g .7.1 Q o o _ . ~ 6 o 9 4 o o o 3 3 4 :i 1
1
' ;i. 6 ~-----Q .e..L o .6./_Q 3 _
_ f'J 0071084oo1 o 100504 05 o o 1 ~N " 164 _ . 09 ! o _V._Ql/!Jo'fl:J i..? __ .,ot..i_.J __
'1' N 0020190040 01006033328 1 Jf,/'' 165 . 09/03/.Q3./Jg3'J.5."?i:;(>o.i.
_i_ __ f'!__ ____ Q Q 93 07 Q Q 0.0 ---_3 6 0 94 Q Q QJ 59_ -----_J ______ 1 _:'.________ 16 5 08 / 06 / 03
-~-----H __ QQ930690QO _ 360940004;14 1 I '' J,67 ______ Q8_LQfi[Q_~3 ____ _
.: 1'. ---~----Q Q 9~ Q~2..9 Q Q ______ ---~ ~.Q .94 _QQ q o_;;g ______ 1_ __ 311/_~: _____________ -1 7J ______ o8_~/ o_7~/~o_3-,--___ _
-i--~N -. -~~ii~:~---6i~i~-~~-;~.6~ ___ i __ -;1::; -----· ---t~~-------~~2~~-~~/,~~EG,utAof
~~---~ii~!~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~-6ti-~t~ ~ ·]7i~----------i-}~-----6~~~ )~~(3tti s .yv,~
__ L.N=M _____ oo34_141000 .. 03004040205 1 3/1 " 177 _____ _Q?f.l-6.Lo3...,---___ _
w 0090236003 01006048008 1 3 /-1 '1 3=81 08/09/03/i/80 0},i~d
t N 0 0 9 3 0 2 2 0 0 0 3631100014 6 1 i I / 18 2 0 8 / 0 6 / 0 3
tl tJ 0065010001 03003044550 1 s/8 11 183 08f05fo3h1L/!iS~.VJ4@.c~
t N 0 0 2 2 0 715 _Q_Q _ _Q_l 0 0 e_Q2_ 8 9 Q !L _____ _1 ____ 3~L_' ________ . l ~~---Q~_LQ 3 / 0 3 b<&l/~ s. C~cksotJ
_'.L~L __ --0 0 6 3 2 6 3 Qfil_ ____ Q]_Q_Q ~ Q-'1 .§3 Q_J ____ ---_ L OnW• :1_ i 11
___ ----__ J !?:? _____ 9!iL2Q/Q~~-T11ii0µ
. t N o o 6311ooo1 04 03 4 o 0_3-_Q_Q_2 _____ L ___ 3/a.~~ _________ 1 a1-_______ QaLQ..5 _L.Q.3_/qce ~ <Jvi,,.1J
1J 009_;3_Ql .?_QQJ ___ -·---~~311000044 1 l '1 185 08/9§/Q~ ____________ _
~ 00900110 0 3 0100 4 0 4 7 2 0 8 1 a/I/" 18 6 0 8 / 0 9 / 0 3/iJ/'l)C ~--k~n
tJ 0093101000 30160JU]_5_Q2 1 5/a~_' ________ 186 Oai..~0~7 ~/~0 ~3 ~----
'V >J 0061140001 46493033664 1 5/(>J 11 188 08/04/03b:3UWOry.1rJ6>'i<J J
~ N _Q.Q_21 _03~_9QQ --~9160046605 1 / '1 188 oe/Of?/OJ -· ·---·--------·-
_'l__N_ _________ Q Q7 QJ,~ § O g p _ O 1O03 O 3 92 3 7 1 3 /,/'' 18 8 ... . 9 9../ Q 'Q j_Q_~/fijJS<J.-"'~ f
_j/_ ~ _ _i)__Q_2_J_Q 510 O_Q ____ ~_Q 1J>Jl Q_1__'!_~Q~-----1 _____ :Jj,/ ~·--_______ l ~ ~ ----·· _Q8/ Q-6J_Q ~----
. N . oo36Q~;i,,ooo 36094000367 1 /.5 ,, 189 08/0 _6/Q3
tJ 0 0 93 056 0 00 36210O08O10 1 '.3//'1 18 9 08/ OE)/ Q~---· ____ _
tJ 0022120550 020040095 1 3 1 I " 189 09/03/03
0093016000 36311000022 1 190 08/06/03
0093118001 30240036413 1 . 193 08/0?/03
0093054000 30160044009 1 195 08/06/03
0021260000 01004030872 1 200 09/03/03
i~ 006317474 7 03 00004 77 05 1 ...... W' 2 03 o 8 / 06 / 03/>i~'Te ~-r~n
0093053000 30160044304 1 203 08/06/03
0093019000 36311000066 1 204 08/06/03
0093110000 30200037374 1 209 08/07/03
0093030000 36311000011 1 209 08/06/03 ~-~. _____ Q06514 __ ~9QJ 03005044755 1 ~~II 210 .98/Q~/Q~/_~L\~~i_f~-----
0093087000 36094000163 1 214 08/07/03
0036079000 36152009759 1 215 08/08/03 .
__ l~ _______ _Q_Q~3'.?.35000 03011049254 1 3\1(11 215 08/07/03)~<til)$,~1~~-
0093074000 36094000276 1 219 08/06/03
' '
LIST PREVIOUS METER READING (INFORMER) 09:38:58
ACCT ...... .
READ.NO ... NO ........ .
0024160003 02011021111
j_~ ___ _QQ2_Q _~~OOOQ ______ Q:J,0070:,31394
t N 0024169003 02010023031
0093046000
0093081000
0093090000
0025080500
0093068000
0093072000
0093075000
0093060000
0063001000
0093023000
0093086000
0093044000
0093077000
0093059000
_l} _______ -0 0 2 2 2 0 1 0 0 1
0054152000
~----
0093049000
0093088000
0070064010
0093078000
0093084000
0093065000
0093089000
0036082000
0093091000
0093062500
0036083000
0092077030
36230009049
36094000210
36094000119
02000010306
36094000389
36094000312
36094000254
36152013010
04035000010
36311000168
36094000152
36230008024
36094000040
36152014012
0:1.009031974
04005023571
36230010015
36094000083
01001040440
36094000232
36094000141
36094000287
36094000061
36094000378
36094000108
36152009001
30240036800
02036002503
243 records listed.
CLASS
CODE.
LAST ...
CONS UMP
LAST ... .
READ ... .
DATE ... .
1 225 09/07/03 .3/ LI 1 _ ;D 0 0 ~IQ~/ Q ~ _}/:)__9__s~I}! ~5 ti ___ _
1 233 09/07 /03 J.3o3f__ V'H_•!~~'.:_Tlf
1 238 08/06/03
1 239 08/06/03
1 241 08/07/03
1 244 09/09/03
1 245 08/06/03
1 249 08/06/03
1 251 08/06/03
1 255 08/06/03
1 257 08/04/03
1 258 08/06/03
1 266 08/07/03
1 272 08/06/03
1 274 08/06/03
1 ,/ 277 08/06/03
1 -3/•I _ 296 09/04/03 _ 3_19_?_:_~~--!!_.~w,jJ~/J }-----_)/,/ ______ ·---i~~-------~~-5~~~~~--23 -~7 4J WJ--;(.t/ ·-LE1l-k
1 31,/ 325 08/07/03 l ?
1 'Ii 327 09/04/03 i-/"''/f/f _!fUtof'~..__
1 361 08/06/03
1 371 08/07/03
1 378 08/06/03
1 386 08/07/03
1 394 08/08/03
1 396 08/07/03
1 509 08/06/03
1 791 08/08/03
1 1962 08/08/03