HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-03-11 WSB AGENDAWATER & SEWER BOARD
AGENDA
TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2014
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ROOM
1. MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 11, 2014 MEETING AND PHONE VOTE.
(ATT. 1)
2. GUEST: COWEEN DICKERSON, 2835 S. PENNSYLVANIA ST. (ATT. 2)
CHARGING INTEREST ON INTEREST -LATE FEES.
3. GUEST: DON MARTURANO -SOUTH ENGLEWOOD SAN. DISTRICT.
4500 S. LAFAYETTE-OUTDOOR LIFT STATION. (ATT. 3)
4. JETNACUUMTRUCKPURCHASE. (ATT.4)
5. ROOF SLAB REHAB FOR TWO 3MG S. CLARKSON WATER TANKS.
(ATT. 5)
6. SEWER BACKUP REMEDIATION POLICY -FLOOD CUTS. (A TT. 6)
7. 804 E. STANFORD AVE. ENGLEWOOD SERVICING PROPERTY IN
DENVER WATER DEPT. AREA. (A TT. 7)
8. SPWRAP. (ATT. 8)
9. OTHER.
WATER & SEWER BOARD
PHONE VOTE -TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2014
Phone Vote Roll Call.
Contacted: Clyde Wiggins, Chuck Habenicht, Tom Burns , Kells Waggoner,, Rick
Gillet, Linda Olson, Jo Lay, Wayne Oakley,
Not Responded: Randy Penn, John Moore
1. MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 11 , 2014 MEETING.
Motion: Approve minutes of the February 11, 2014 Water and Sewer Board meeting.
Moved: Habenicht Seconded: Waggoner
Motion passed unanimou sly.
The next Water and Sewer Board meeting will be Tuesday, March 11, 20 14 at 5 :0 0 p.m. in the
Community D evelopment Conference Room.
Re spectfully submitted,
/Signature/
Cathy Burrage
Re cording Secretary
I -I
Present:
Absent:
Also present:
WATER & SEWER
MINUTES
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2014
Oakley, Wiggins, Habenicht , Waggoner, Burns, Penn, Olson, Lay, Gillet,
Moore
None
Stewart Fonda, Director of Utilities
John Bock, Manager of Administration
Tom Brennan, Utilities Engineer
Mitch Riley, Distribution Collection Supt.
The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m .
0
I. MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 14, 2014 MEETING.
The Board reviewed the Minutes of the January 14, 2014 meeting. A correction was noted.
Motion:
Moved:
To approve the Minutes of the November 12, 2014 Water Board meeting
as corrected.
Habenicht Seconded: Waggoner
Motion approved unanimously.
2. GUEST: MAUREEN FOLEY -590 PENNWOOD CIR.
The owner of 590 Pennwood Cir., Maureen Foley, Appeared to discuss damages that resulted
from a City water main break on December 8, 2013 and request compensation. Belfor Property
Restoration responded for cleanup and is authorized by the City to perform flood cuts to enable
the area behind the drywall to dry out so mold will not form. With the existing contract, the
drywall removed for the flood cut is not replaced.
J -2
Ms. Foley requested compensation for displacing the tenant and drywall repair. The Board had
previously ruled on a policy that in the case of a City main caused incident , the City will provide
cleanup but not repair. The Board expressed concern about open-ended liability. It was also
noted that municipalities are not liable under State statute and the owner's next appeal would be
with the District Court.
Motion:
Moved:
To approve Belfor Property Restoration to provide drywall repair for 590
Pennwood Circle.
Burns Seconded: Waggoner
Motion approved unanimously.
[?]
3. 705 W. NASSAU WAY.
Charla Beram appeared before the Board to discuss a sewer main backup on January 11, 2014
caused by towels in the main. There was a delayed response of three hours caused by a
malfunction with the main emergency phone line going into the Allen Plant. An alternate
emergency phone number had been given to d is patch, but was not used. It has also been
standard practice to dispatch a patrol unit if there is no response at the Allen Plant, which did not
happen. Mr. Fonda has brought these issues to the Police Chief's attention.
Ms. Beram requested reimbursement for the S5 ,000 deductible on her homeowner 's insurance
and reimbursement for the hot water heater and furnace repair.
Mr. Mitch Riley, Distribution and Collection Superintendent, was present to discuss the sewer
main issues, maintenance schedules, and access problems in this area. The owner obtained a
quote from Belfour for drywall repair. Installing check valves on the private mains in this area
was discussed as a potential preventative meas ure. Mr. Fonda and the Board concurred that the
agreement for this isolated case is due to extenuating circumstances created by a communication
problem, and does not constitute a precedent.
Motion:
Moved:
To grant additional funds to cover the $5,000 homeowner's insurance deductible
and $1,500 for the hot water heater and furnace repair for a total of $6,500.
Check valves will also be installed on the service lines of the houses involved in
this event.
Burns Seconded: Oakley
Motion approved unanimously.
J ·-3
>
fgj
4. WATER AND SEWER TAP CREDITS AT KENT PLACE
Eric Chekal and Kevin Foltz appeared to request that the full amount of the water and sewer tap
credits be refunded to Regency, Continuum and Forum, to be divided according to the
percentage of acres owned. Regency claims they were not aware of the water and sewer
connection credits at the time applications and fees were submitted.
The Denver Seminary land was purchased by Continuum Partners and carried with it water and
sewer tap credits which could have been applied as various builders requested taps from the City.
Continuum sold the residential portion of the land to the Forum Co. and the commercial section
to Regency Co. and entered a partnership with Regency. Regency Centers then instructed the
City to withhold the tap credits and collect water and sewer tap fees from the various builders,
which the City did.
It is the City Attorney 's position that refunds shall be made first to the businesses or individuals
who unnecessarily paid for the taps on this site. To receive a refund, the owners must submit a
written agreement signed by each party and the four business owners that have paid tap fees to
the City, clearly stating that the payees are waiving their rights to a refund and authorizing
payment to the owner of Kent Place Properties.
District Court would be the next step for remediation if all parties do not agree. It was noted that
unused tap credits will not be reimbursed.
~
5. ALUM SLUDGE REMOVAL.
Tom Brennan appeared to discuss alum residuals produced by the settling and filter backwashing
process. Residuals are produced year-round and processed and stored until disposal. Storage
space has since run out, and the Allen Filter Plant needs to dispose of these residuals. Bids were
received by two vendors. Secure On-Site Services USA is the recommended acceptable bidder
at $174,635.06 for one year's production of 750 yards.
Tom Brennan noted that the Utilities Department staff is working with the State Health
Department and alternate landfills for alternative solutions for disposing of alum sludge.
Disposing of the 750 yards will allow a year to investigate alternatives for a cheaper solution and
longer contracts.
Motion:
Moved:
To recommend Council approval, by motion, of the proposal for the Allen
Water filtration Plant residuals removal and disposal to Secure On-Site
Services in the amount of $174,635.06 for disposal of 750 cubic yards of
production.
Waggoner Seconded: Gillet
>
Motion passed unanimously.
6. WEBSITE COMMENT FORM.
The Board received a copy of a comment form that was submitted to the City Manager 's office
from a citizen noting an improvement in water quality .
7. WATER AND SEWER BACKUP REMEDIATION POLICY.
The Board noted they would like to discuss the existing water and sewer main backup
remediation policy at a future meeting.
The meeting adjourned at 6:20 p.m.
The next meeting will be Tuesday , March 11 , 2014 at 5 :00 in the community Deve lopment
Conference Room.
Respectfully submitted,
Cathy Burrage
Recording Secretary
j -S"
MEMORANDUM
To: ·City Council ~-
From: John Bock, Utilities Manager of Administratio~if//'t-
Date: February 19, 2014
Subject: Council Request 14 -025
At its February 11, 2014, meeting the Water and Sewer Board considered the matter of
charging interest and charging late fees on late fees. It was determined that the City's
practices are legal and appropriate and the Board instructed the Utilities Department to
continue the existing practice. The minutes for that particular item are attached.
The facts presented to the Board were that, although it may, the Utilities Department has
never charged interest on past due balances. The Department charges late fees at the rate
of 5% per month up to 25% on the past due balance. Because of the way the Englewood
Municipal Code (EMC) specifies that the various accounts receivable are satisfied
(stormwater first, then concrete, then sewer and water last), it can be argued that water
late fees are being charged on water late fees. The Department's late fee practice
conforms to the EMC and Colorado State Statue, which language was adopted into the
EMC.
This account has a long history of past due charges, as can be seen from the attached
account history. It appears the customer has been paying everything but the late fees for
some time. The account currently owes $13 .22 which is mainly late fees.
The Water and Sewer Board meets the second Tuesday of each month and is open to the
public. We only ask that those parties wishing to present an item to the Board provide
notice of their intent to attend and supporting documents ten days ahead of time so the
Board has time to review the facts before the meeting.
As set forth in the EMC, the Board's decision is final. Further action would be to appeal
the issue to District Court.
z -/
#
From Faxzero Wed 12 Feb 2014 03 :17:52 PM EST Page 1 of 3
ff~~ffi®.com
send a fax for free
To: John Bock
Recipient lnfonnation
Company: City of Englewood
Fax#: 13037836894
From: Coween Dickerson
Sender Information
Email address: cadickers@juno.com (from 66.233.180.123)
Sent on: Wednesday, February 12 2014 at 3:14 PM EST
Attached please find another communicat ion , s ince you have failed to respond to the last 3
commun ications from me, sent via ema il and fax.
This fax was &ent using the FaxZaro.com rree fax serv ice . Fax.Zero .com has a zen> lol1ranc1 pol icy for abuse and junk faxes If this fix Is
spam or abusive , please e-mail support@faxzsro .com or send a faM to BOQ.960.SBSB . Specify tax #11329943 . Wa wl~ add your fax number to
the block list.
2 -2
1/1
f'rom FaxZero Wed 12 Feb 2014 03:17:52 PM EST
Memo
To: John Bock, Utilities Manager of Administration
From: Coween Dickerson 2835 S. Pennsylvania St
Subject: Your failure to respond to my questions and request for info
Cc: Nancy Reid, Assistant City Attorney
Not having heard from you re my questions detailed in 2 faxes and I email, I herein
renew my questions and comments and add the following .
I went to the Englewood site re the Water & Sewer Board to check what was on the
agenda and review the minutes . I found that there is no decision posted on the agenda
item you claimed was a decision on my appeal. Your memo to Nancy Reid was posted . I
note the following:
1. My name and my question were not cited .
2. I never questioned "interest". I asked that all late charges be removed, because I had
been told by (you) John Bock, on the phone they would be, because I did not receive the
bill(s) timely, your website did not record payments, I could not access the website for
days at a time, among others.
3. You said no one could have told me the late charges would be removed, because no
matter the reason, it just was not done (even though it has been, even for me). You further
stated that the EMC had "almost the exact wording" of the state statute, of which you
read a small portion . I pointed out that I knew the statute and that almost is not exact and
that 1 word difference changes and can negate the "letter" of the law . I further pointed
out that state statute prohibited charging penalties (late charges) on late charges . That is
the statute I cited. You said that you would not argue the matter with me but would refer
to the City attorney and let me know what they had to say .
Your memo to Nancy Reid does not state the issue I raised and is misleading at best,
whether or not inadvertent.
I . I never complained that you were charging interest on late fees. I complained that
you had sent me a late/disconnection notice on $22.xx accumulated late fees,
which consisted of late fees that should have been removed as promised, and late
fees on late fees, which are prohibited by state law.
2. You told me that upon receiving payment, late charges are satisfied first, to which
I have replied orally and in writing, is not in confonnance with consumer rights,
generally accepted accounting principles or law. You wrote in your memo to Reid
z -3
Page 2 of 3
·.
' From Faxzero Wed 12 Feb 2014 03:17:52 PM EST
that "any associated late fees are sat isfied are also paid", so late fees are charged
on late fees by your admission. You wrote in your letter dated 1116114 that water
charges are satisfied last, clearly contradicting your statement to me, to Nancy
Reid.
There are problems with what you wrote to Reid Your statements do not
"associate" any late fees to the individual charges. They are shown as a lump sum
as Jate charge above the line before the current bill line item detail. Even your
website shows current bill amounts only and no "associated" late charges
identified as being charged on individual amounts . Nor are payments shown as
applied to individual line items in the order described. In no case can there be any
late charges associated with anything but water charges, and then not until the
next billing period if the prior current bill was paid in full before the late charges
were assessed. However, water charges are listed first and there is no explanation
of how you apply payments . You have gone farther in my case . You have
threatened disconnection for failure/refusal to pay late charges and late charges on
late charges, even though there is no such statement on your bills nor law
permitting such action for non payment of late fees, much less for the prohibited
late fees on late fees.
3. Your final statement/question is incomplete and incomprehensible. Making the
assumption that you meant "are we only governed by the CRS"? The answer is
yes. You are justifying your incorrect, confused billing practices on what you are
allowed to do under the CRS, but ignoring the clear prohibitions against what you
admit, however inadvertently, that you are doing. You don't even follow what is
stated on the back of your statements .
Your 2 responses to me did not and do not address my "appeal". I have no way of
knowing what the alleged decision by the Water & Sewer Board really is, as it has not
been posted, whatever it was was not based on MY question and "appeal" and therefore
has nothing to do with me . MY question and appeal of late charges is still open, valid and
unanswered. I cannot "appeal" a decision that is not applicable to me to an unnamed
court. No court or even Board has made a decision on a case brought by me, so I cannot
appeal to another court of jurisdiction, nor should I have to. Under the circumstances, a
court is not the appropriate jurisdiction. Your billing/payment application process as
described by you, is just wrong. Please correct the back of your statements. What you
claimed in your memo to Nancy Reid and what you wrote me are different and neither is
reflective of what is on the back of your billing statements, and none are what actually
has happened in my case . Also, there is at least 1 misused word that negates your
intention to relieve you of responsibility "Accessed" is not the same or even similar
meaning to "assessed" which is what was possibly intended .
I expect you to cease charging late charges on late charges and credit off the $22.90 late
charge balance charged on my account.
Page 3 of 3
John Bock
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
cadickers@juno.com
Friday, January 31, 2014 2:21 PM
John Bock
letter dated January 29
The Water and Sewer Board did NOT render a decision on the appeal of late charges on late charges, according
to your letter. The decision was made on interest, which I did not appeal. The decision cannot be final on MY
appeal as it was not made on MY appeal , nor was it made in light of the state law on late charges on late
charges which is prohibited, nor was it made on the fact that your website and billing practices are faulty and
not within the law. I was not made aware of this "decision" in a timely fashion, nor does it have anything to do
with my appeal.
What "District Court" and why should I have to appeal to them since the decision was not made on the facts or
grounds of MY initial appeal?
Coween Dickerson
2835 S. Pennsylvania
Englewood, CO 80113
303 781 5242
How to Sleep Like a Rock
Obey this one natural trick to fall asleep and stay asleep all night.
peaklife.com
2 -S"
From Faxzero Wed 19 Feb 2014 05:44:30 PM EST
ff ~~lli® .com
sand a tax for free
To: John Bock
Recipient Information
Company: City of Englewood
Fax#: 13037836894
Sender Information
From: Coween Dickerson
Email address: cadickers@juno.com (from 66.233.180.123)
Sent on: Wednesday, February 19 2014 at 5:41 PM EST
my answer to your non responsive irrelevant letter dated 2/14/14
Page 1 of 3
Th is fax was sent us ing the FaXZero .com free fax seNice . FaxZero .com has a zero tolerance po li cy for abuse and junk faxes . If this fax is
spam or abusive , please e-mai l support@faxzero .com or send a fax to B00 -960 -6856 . Specify fax #1 1362693 . We wi ll add your fax number to
the block li st.
2 -(.;;
111
From Faxzero Wed 19 Feb 2014 05:44:30 PM EST
John Bock
Utilities Manager of Administration
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood, CO 80110
Re : letter dated 2114 /2014 rec'd 2119 /14
Mr. Bock
This letter is still non responsive to the facts and the situation in general.
1. What was presented to the Board had nothing to do with my "appeal", nor did it
address the real issue, nor did my name and concerns appear anyvvhere .
2. The minutes , the "decision" if it bore any relationship to my concerns, was not
posted or made final by the Board w ithin the time limit you claim is binding on
me.
3 . Since the "decision" had nothing whatsoever to do with my concerns , and neither
did the letter you sent purporting to relay the actual "decision", I am not subject to
the decision or EMC 12-lD-6.
4 . State la w is clear that late charges cannot be charged on late charges, which you
have been doing, by your own admission in writing and before the Board .
5. The billing statements do not show what you purport to be the "law" regarding
application oflate charges and payments , nor does "published " policy (on the
back of the statements).
a . The published policy on lat e fees is 5% per month if bills are not paid by
the due date . There is no indication of a 15 day grace period before
imposition of late fees , nor your claim of2 .5%.
b . There is no indication that late fees are imposed on each individual charge,
nor do the statements show this . The bills themselves do not show
anything but a lump sum lat e fee above the line of the current charges and
apparently imposed on previous balance unpaid .
c . There is no indication on the bills or the published policy that imposed late
fees are paid first , which is what you told me, or that they are divided
among the individual charges on the bills , and paid in order, leaving the
water charges for last.
d . Your published policy on the back of the statement, attempts to shield you
from responsibility on late charges, but ONLY for misaddressed (and not
even that because of the voiding of meaning because of the grammatical
error. ) You still can and should reverse late charges due to failure of the
website to accept payment and lack of access to the website (system error
is rampant and frequent), and the frequent occurrence of failure to mail
timely or even deliver bills . If you ever get the website working properly,
perhaps one problem, that of mis delivery and non delivery and untimely
delivery of bills, will no longer exist.
Your billing system and hidden policies on late fees and payment application are
in violation of state law (in assessing late charges on late charges), public policy,
and consumer protection laws .
2. -7
Page 2 of 3
From Faxzero Wed 19 Feb 2014 05:44:30 PM EST
EMC 12-1 D-6 does not apply to me , or my concerns or situation. In addition, you
never timely notified me of this irrelevant code , nor did you respond to my
question of what court hears appea ls of non court decisions that are not decisions
based on any "case" brought by me .
Coween Dickerson
2835 S. Pennsylvania St
Englewood, CO 80113
Cc : Kancy Reid
Joe Jefferson
2-6
Page 3 of ::
/
/
Fri 24 Jan 2014 12:16:05 PM EST
January 24, 2014
John Bock, Manager Utilities City of Englewood
1000 Englewood Pkway
Englewood, CO 801 10
Page 2 of 3
//'"'· I .~
The letter you sent dated January 16, 2014 received Jan 23, regarding the "decision" of the
Board, does not and did not address the concerns and issues I raised with you earlier. I did not
question charging interest. My expressed concern was for charging late fees on late fees and
the late fees charged to me on bills I paid online, on time but because your system is
inadequate and also fails frequently for days at a time, I was not aware that the payment had
not been recorded. Specifically
1. "Almost" is not exactly the same wording and does not take into account all the state law.
2. Yes the provisions of the EMC do violate the State Statute . The wording in the State law is
clear that late charges are NOT to be charged on late charges. Section 29-1-1102 CRS .
Delinquencies cannot exceed 5% of the current amount due, or $15 excluding earlier
penalties . It prohibits charging a penal ty (delinquency) on outstanding penalty amounts,
even if your payment application practice s apply in error and violation oflaw to penalties
first .
3. I never brought up interest and don't care about it. This is irrelevant and a straw dog
argument.
4. Your payment application is faulty at best. It should NOT be "possible" that late fees can
be charged on late fees, in violation of sta te and federal Jaw. Payments should and by law
be applied to the water charges first, usua l and customary practice especially in light of
state law . Unless the payment does include the late fees, payments should not be applied to
penalties (late fees or red tag fees)
5. I have been charged late charges on late charges that I should not have been charged in the
first place. You had stated that until the "decision" was made , I would not receive any
further demands for payment or late fees, yet I got a "red tag" and more late fees assessed,
further evidence that your administration and billing practices are faulty and result in
violation of state and federal Jaw, however inadvertent.
6. Many times I have not received the bill on time or before the due date (misdelivered and
neighbors orthe po~man delivered after th e. due date).
7. When the City started accepting payments online, at least 3 times I thought I had submitted
payment on time, but your system did not register the payment and I had no way of
knowing until 1 got a late notice . I called the first time and the man who answered told me
he would delete that late charge from the bill, though it never happened.
8. Several times the system would not take payment online for 2-3 days at a time, so maybe 2
times the payment would ·not have been made by the due date, but shortly thereafter,
certainly not 15 days after. · -
9. I was out of town for 2 months at least twice in the last 2 years . I pay and receive
(paperless) all my bills online and on time . The City of Englewood is the ONLY bill I have
had this problem with and the only one the USPO handles, badly .(late or never delivered)
In conclusion, I request that the late fees be removed from my account and the billing and
payment practices be conformed to state Jaw. The Board's decision clearly was not made on
accurate and complete information .
Coween Dickerson 2835 S. Pennsylvania St Englewood, CO 80113
2 -?
Created Date/Time: 02/19/2014 04 :42 :42 PM
Customer Number : 00002295
Account Number : 01005028355
Service Address : 2835 S PENNSYLVANIA ST
Mailing Address :
COWEEN DICKERSON
2835 S PENNSYLVANIA ST
ENGLEWOOD CO 80113 -1645
Customer/Account Transaction History
Trans Date Transaction
2/13/2014 0 :00 Wate r Balance Late Fee
2/5/2014 0 :00 Payment -TeleWorks
1/31/2014 0 :00 Payment -TeleWork s
1/1/2014 0 :00 Cycle Bill ing Due : 02/01/2014
12/19/2013 0 :00 Red Tag Fee
12/16/2013 0 :00 Red Tag Fee
11/13/2013 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee
10/29/2013 0 :00 Payment -TeleWor ks
10/1/2013 0 :00 Cycle Bi ll ing Due : 11/01/2013
8/25/2013 0 :00 Payment -TeleWor ks
8/13/2013 0:00 Sewer Balance Late Fee
8/13/2013 0:00 Water Balance Late Fee
Description
Outstanding Water Ba lance Late Fee
Payment -Thank You
Payment -Thank Yo u
Cycle Bill ing Due : 02/01/2014
Red Tag Fee
Red Tag Fee
Outstanding Water Ba lance Late Fee
Payment -Thank You
Cycle Bill ing Du e: 11/01/2013
Payment -Than k You
Outstanding Sewer Balance Late Fee
Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee
8/13/2013 0:00 Storm Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Storm Water Balance Late Fee
8/13/2013 0 :00 Concrete Balance Late Fee Outstanding Concrete Balance Late Fee
7 /1/2013 0 :00 Cycle Bil li ng Due : 08/01/2013 Cycle Bill ing Due : 08/01/2013
5/16/2013 0 :00 Payment-TeleWork s Payment -Than k You
5/14/2013 0:00 Sewer Balance Late Fee Outstanding Sewer Balance Late Fee
5/14/2013 0:00 Concrete Balance Late Fee Outstanding Concrete Balance Late Fee
5/14/2013 0:00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstand i ng Water Balance Late Fee
5/14/2013 0:00 Storm Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Storm Water Balance Late Fee
4/1/2013 0 :00 Cycle Bill ing Due : 05/01/2013 Cycl e Billing Due : 05/01/2013
2/24/2013 0 :00 Payment -TeleWorks
2/12/2013 0:00 Concrete Balance Late Fee
2/12/2013 0:00 Storm Water Balance Late Fee
2/12/2013 0:00 Water Balance Late Fee
2/12/2013 0:00 Sewer Balance Late Fee
1/1/2013 0 :00 Cycle Bi ll in g Due : 02/01/2013
11/13/2012 0:00 Water Balance Late Fee
11/1/2012 0 :00 Payme nt -Te leWorks
10/1/2012 0 :00 Cycle Billi ng Due : 11/01/2012
8/14/2012 0 :00 Water Ba lance Late Fee
7/27/2012 0 :00 Payment -TeleWorks
7 /1/2012 0 :00 Cycle Bill ing Due : 08/01/2012
5/15/2012 0:00 Water Balance Late Fee
4/30/2012 0 :00 Payment-TeleWork s
4/1/2012 0 :00 Cycle Billing Due : 05/01/2012
2/14/2012 0:00 Water Balance Late Fee
1/29/2012 0 :00 Payment -Te leWo rk s
1/1/2012 0:00 Cycle Bill ing Due : 02/01/2012
11/30/2011 0 :00 Reconcile Balance To Storm
11/30/2011 0 :00 Reconc ile Balance To Concrete
Payment -Thank You
Outstanding Concrete Balance Late Fee
Outstanding Storm Water Balance Late Fee
Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee
Outstanding Sewer Balance Late Fee
Cycle Bi ll ing Due : 02/01/2013
Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee
Payment -Than k You
Cycle Billing Due : 11/01/2012
Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee
Payment -Thank You
Cycle Billi ng Due : 08/01/2012
Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee
Payment -Thank You
Cycle Billing Due : 05/01/2012
Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee
Payment -Thank You
Cycle Bill ing Due : 02/01/2012
Reconc ile Ba lance To Storm Wate r
Reconcile Ba lance To Concrete
2 -10
Amount Balance
$0 .32 $13 .22
($10.00) $12.90
($106.35) $22 .90
$106 .35 $129 .25
($5 .00) $22 .90
$5 .00 $27 .90
$0 .56 $22.90
($104 .08) $22 .34
$104 .08 $126.42
($97.50) $22.34
$1.42 $119.84
$0 .71 $118.42
$0 .10 $117 .71
$0 .21 $117 .61
$97.50 $117 .40
($77 .76) $19 .90
$1.42 $97 .66
$0 .21 $96 .24
$0 .21 $96 .03
$0.10 $95.82
$77 .76 $95 .72
($77 .86) $17.96
$0 .21 $95 .82
$0 .10 $95 .61
$0 .21 $95 .51
$1.42 $95 .30
$77 .76 $93 .88
$0 .39 $16.12
($100 .24) $15 .73
$100 .24 $115 .97
$0 .38 $15 .73
($96.95) $15.35
$96 .95 $112 .30
$0 .37 $15 .35
($80.50) $14 .98
$80 .50 $95.48
$0 .37 $14 .98
($93 .66) $14.61
$93 .66 $108.27
$0 .10 $14 .61
$0 .17 $14 .51
11/30/2011 0 :00 Reconcile Ba lance To Sewer Reconcile Ba lance To Sewer $1.37 $14 .34
11/30/2011 0 :00 Transfer Balance A/R Reconciliation ($1.64) $12 .97
11/29/2011 0 :00 Storm Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Storm Water Balance Late Fee ($0 .10) $14 .61
11/29/2011 0 :00 Sewer Balance Late Fee Outstanding Sewer Balance Late Fee ($1 .37) $14 .71
11/29/2011 0 :00 Concrete Balance Late Fee Outstanding Concrete Balance Late Fee ($0.17) $16 .08
11/29/2011 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee ($1.69) $16.25
11/17 /2011 0 :00 Payment-TeleWorks Payment -Thank You ($133.14) $17 .94
11/15/2011 0 :00 Concrete Balance Late Fee Outstanding Concrete Balance Late Fee $0 .17 $151.08
11/15/2011 0 :00 Storm Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Storm Water Balance Late Fee $0 .10 $150 .91
11/15/2011 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee $1.69 $150.81
11/15/2011 0 :00 Sewer Balance Late Fee Outstanding Sewer Balance Late Fee $1.37 $149.12
10/1/2011 0 :00 Cycle Billing Due : 11/01/2011 Cycle Bi lling Due : 11/01/2011 $133 .14 $147 .75
8/12/2011 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee $0 .21 $14 .61
8/4/2011 0 :00 Payment-TeleWorks Payment -Thank You ($73 .92) $14.40
7 /1/2011 0 :00 Cycle Bill i ng Due : 08/01/2011 Cycle Bi lling Due : 08/01/2011 $73 .92 $88 .32
5/13/2011 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee $0.21 $14.40
5/4/2011 0 :00 Payment-TeleWor ks Payment -Thank You ($73.76) $14 .19
4/1/2011 0 :00 Cycle Bi lling Due : 05/01/2011 Cycle Bi lling Due : 05/01/2011 $73 .76 $87.95
2/15/2011 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee $0 .35 $14 .19
1/31/2011 0 :00 Payment-TeleWor ks Payme nt -ThankYou ($92.10) $13.84
1/1/2011 0:00 Cycle Billi ng Due : 02/01/2011 Cycle Billi ng Due : 02/01/2011 $92 .10 $105.94
11/15/2010 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee $0.34 $13 .84
11/1/2010 0 :00 Payment -Te leWorks Payment -Thank You ($109.81) $13.50
10/1/2010 0 :00 Cycle Bill ing Due : 11/01/2010 Cycle Bill ing Due : 11/01/2010 $109 .81 $123.31
8/13/2010 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee $0 .33 $13.50
7 /30/2010 0 :00 Payment-TeleWorks Payment -Th ank You ($84.93) $13 .17
7 /1/2010 0 :00 Cycle Bi ll i ng Due : 08/01/2010 Cycl e Bi lling Due : 08/01/2010 $84.93 $98 .10
5/17 /2010 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstand i ng Water Balance Late Fee $0 .32 $13 .17
5/10/2010 0 :00 Payment -TeleWo r ks Payment -Thank You ($81 .34) $12 .85
4/1/2010 0 :00 Cycle Bill ing Due : 05/01/2010 Cycle Bi ll ing Due : 05/01/2010 $81.34 $94 .19
2/12/2010 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee $0 .31 $12.85
2/2/2010 0 :00 Paym ent-TeleWorks Payment -Than k You ($89.15) $12.54
1/1/2010 0 :00 Cycle Billi ng Due : 02/01/2010 Cycle Billing Due : 02/01/2010 $89 .15 $101 .69
11/12/2009 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee $0 .31 $12.54
10/30/2009 0 :00 Payment -TeleWo r ks Payment -ThankYou ($91.19) $12 .23
10/1/2009 0 :00 Cycle Bill ing Due : 11/01/2009 Cycle Bil li ng Due : 11/01/2009 $91.19 $103 .42
8/13/2009 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee $0 .30 $12 .23
8/2/2009 0 :00 Payment-TeleWorks Payment -ThankYou ($79.89) $11 .93
7 /1/2009 0 :00 Cycle Bi lling Due : 08/01/2009 Cycle Billing Due : 08/01/2009 $79 .59 $91.82
5/14/2009 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee $0 .30 $12 .23
5/1/2009 0 :00 Payment Payment -ThankYou ($73.44) $11.93
4/1/2009 0 :00 Cycle Bill ing Due : 05/01/2009 Cycle Billi ng Due : 05/01/2009 $73.44 $85 .37
2/13/2009 0 :00 Concrete Balance Late Fee Outstanding Concrete Balance Late Fee $0 .16 $11.93
1/30/2009 0 :00 Payment Payment -ThankYou ($97.22) $11.77
1/1/2009 0 :00 Cycle Billing Due : 02/01/2009 Cycle Bi l ling Due : 02/01/2009 $97 .12 $108 .99
12/15/2008 0 :00 Payme nt Payment -Thank You ($203.43) $11.87
11/13/2008 0 :00 Concrete Balance Late Fee Outstanding Concrete Balance Late Fee $0 .13 $215.30
11/13/2008 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee $3 .77 $215 .17
11/13/2008 0 :00 Sewer Balance Late Fee Outstanding Sewer Balance Late Fee $1 .09 $211.40
11/13/2008 0 :00 Storm Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Storm Water Balance Late Fee $0 .10 $210 .31
10/1/2008 0 :00 Cycle Billing Due : 11/01/2008 Cycle Bi lli ng Due : 11/01/2008 $203.43 $210 .21
8/4/2008 0 :00 Payment Payment -ThankYou ($86.90) $6 .78
7 /1/2008 0 :00 Cycle Billing Due : 08/01/2008 Cycle Bi lli ng Due : 08/01/2008 $86 .90 $93.68
4/29/2008 0 :00 Payment Payment -Thank You ($75 .52) $6 .78
z -I (
4/1/2008 0 :00 Cycle Billing Due : 05/01/2008 Cycle Bill ing Due : 05/01/2008 $75 .52 $82 .30
2/1/2008 0 :00 Payment Payment -Thank You ($81.91) $6 .78
1/1/2008 0 :00 Cycle Bill ing Due : 02/01/2008 Cycle Billing Due : 02/01/2008 $81.91 $88 .69
10/31/2007 0 :00 Payment Payment -Thank You ($104 .18) $6 .78
10/1/2007 0 :00 Cycle Billing Due: 11/01/2007 Cycle Billing Due : 11/01/2007 $104.18 $110 .96
8/1/2007 0 :00 Payment Payment -Thank You ($69.04) $6 .78
7 /1/2007 0:00 Cycle Billing Due : 08/01/2007 Cycle Billing Due : 08/01/2007 $69 .04 $75 .82
4/26/2007 0 :00 Payment Payment -Thank You ($63 .59) $6 .78
4/1/2007 0 :00 Cycle Bil lin g Due : 05/01/2007 Cycle Billing Due : 05/01/2007 $63 .59 $70 .37
1/29/2007 0 :00 Payment Payment -Thank You ($65 .10) $6 .78
1/1/2007 0 :00 Cycle Billing Due : 02/01/2007 Cycle Billing Due : 02/01/2007 $65.10 $71.88
11/28/2006 0 :00 Payment Payment -Thank You ($64 .76) $6 .78
11/14/2006 0:00 Concrete Balance Late Fee Outstanding Concrete Balance Late Fee $0 .13 $71.54
11/14/2006 0 :00 Storm Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Storm Water Balance Late Fee $0.10 $71.41
11/14/2006 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee $0 .56 $71.31
11/14/2006 0 :00 Sewer Balance Late Fee Outstanding Sewer Balance Late Fee $0.83 $70 .75
10/1/2006 0 :00 Cycle Billing Due : 11/01/2006 Cycle Billing Due : 11/01/2006 $64 .76 $69.92
8/30/2006 0 :00 Payment Payment -Thank You ($74.04) $5 .16
8/14/2006 0 :00 Concrete Balance Late Fee Outstanding Concrete Balance Late Fee $0.13 $79 .20
8/14/2006 0 :00 Storm Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Storm Water Balance Late Fee $0 .10 $79 .07
8/14/2006 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee $0 .79 $78 .97
8/14/2006 0:00 Sewer Balance Late Fee Outstand ing Sewer Balance Late Fee $0 .83 $78.18
7 /1/2006 0 :00 Cycle Bill in g Due : 08/01/2006 Cycle Billing Due : 08/01/2006 $74 .04 $77 .35
5/9/2006 0:00 Payment Payment -Thank You ($59 .68) $3.31
4/1/2006 0 :00 Cycle Billing Due : 05/01/2006 Cycle Billing Due : 05/01/2006 $59.68 $62.99
3/1/2006 0 :00 Payment Payment -Thank You ($58 .78) $3 .31
2/14/2006 0 :00 Concrete Balance Late Fee Outstand ing Concrete Balance Late Fee $0 .13 $62 .09
2/14/2006 0 :00 Storm Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Storm Water Balance Late Fee $0 .10 $61.96
2/14/2006 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee $0.41 $61.86
2/14/2006 0 :00 Sewer Balance Late Fee Outstanding Sewer Balance Late Fee $0 .83 $61.45
12/31/2005 0 :00 Cycle Billing Due : 01/30/2006 Cycle Bill ing Due : 01/30/2006 $58.78 $60.62
11/21/2005 0 :00 Payment Payment -Thank You ($73.84) $1.84
11/15/2005 0 :00 Sewer Balance Late Fee Outstanding Sewer Balance Late Fee $0 .72 $75.68
11/15/2005 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee $0 .89 $74 .96
11/15/2005 0 :00 Storm Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Storm Water Balance Late Fee $0 .10 $74.07
11/15/2005 0 :00 Concrete Balance Late Fee Outstanding Concrete Balance Late Fee $0 .13 $73 .97
10/1/2005 0:00 Cycle Billing Due : 11/01/2005 Cycle Bil ling Due : 11/01/2005 $73.84 $73 .84
8/25/2005 0:00 Payment Payment -Thank You ($60 .26) $0 .00
8/15/2005 0:00 Sewer Balance Late Fee Outstanding Sewer Balance Late Fee $0.72 $60 .26
8/15/2005 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee $0.52 $59.54
8/15/2005 0:00 Storm Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Storm Water Balance Late Fee $0 .10 $59 .02
8/15/2005 0 :00 Concrete Balance Late Fee Outstanding Concrete Balance Late Fee $0 .13 $58 .92
7 /1/2005 0 :00 Cycle Billing Due: 08/01/2005 Cycle Billing Due : 08/01/2005 $58 .79 $58 .79
5/3/2005 0 :00 Payment Payment -Thank You ($53.99) $0.00
4/1/2005 0 :00 Transfer Balance A/R Reconciliation ($5 .00) $53 .99
4/1/2005 0 :00 Reconcile Balance To General Reconcile Balance To General $5 .00 $58 .99
4/1/2005 0 :00 Cycle Billing Due : 05/01/2005 Cycle Billing Due: 05/01/2005 $53 .99 $53 .99
3/31/2005 0 :00 Transfer Balance A/R Reconcil iation ($5.00) $0.00
3/31/2005 0 :00 Reconcile Balance To Water Reconcile Ba lance To Water $5 .00 $5 .00
3/31/2005 0 :00 Transfer Ba lance A/R Reconcil iation ($5.00) $0 .00
3/31/2005 0:00 Reconcile Balance To Water Reconcile Ba lance To Water $5 .00 $5 .00
3/30/2005 0 :00 Red Tag Fee Red Tag Fee ($5.00) $0.00
3/23/2005 0 :00 Payment Payment -Thank You ($55 .58) $5 .00
3/16/2005 0 :00 Red Tag Fee Red Tag Fee $5.00 $60 .58
2 -IZ
2/15/2005 0 :00 Sewer Balance Late Fee Outstanding Sewer Balance Late Fee $0.72 $55.58
2/15/2005 0 :00 Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Water Balance Late Fee $0.40 $54 .86
2/15/2005 0 :00 Storm Water Balance Late Fee Outstanding Storm Water Balance Late Fee $0.10 $54.46
2/15/2005 0 :00 Concrete Balance Late Fee Outstanding Concrete Balance Late Fee $0 .13 $54.36
1/1/2005 0 :00 Cycle Billing Due : 02/01/2005 Cycle Billing Due : 02/01/2005 $54 .23 $54 .23
11/2/2004 0 :00 Payment -Storm Water Payment -Storm Water ($4 .16) $0.00
11/2/2004 0 :00 Payment -Concrete Payment -Concrete ($5.17) $4.16
11/2/2004 0 :00 Payment -Sewer Payment -Sewer ($25 .05) $9.33
11/2/2004 0 :00 Payment -Water Payment -Water ($21 .70) $34 .38
10/1/2004 0 :00 Regular Billing -Concrete Regular Billing -Concrete $5 .17 $56 .08
10/1/2004 0 :00 Regular Bill in g -Storm Water Regular Billing -Storm Water $4 .16 $50 .91
10/1/2004 0 :00 Regular Billing -Sewer Regular Billing -Sewer $25 .05 $46.75
10/1/2004 0 :00 Regular Billing -Water Regular Billing -Water $21.70 $21.70
8/3/2004 0:00 Payment -Storm Water Payment -St orm Water ($4 .16) $0 .00
8/3/2004 0 :00 Payment -Concrete Payment -Concrete ($5 .17) $4.16
8/3/2004 0 :00 Payment -Sewer Payment -Sewer ($25.05) $9 .33
8/3/2004 0 :00 Payment -Water Payment -Water ($21.70) $34.38
7 /1/2004 0 :00 Regular Billing -Concrete Regular Billing -Concrete $5 .17 $56 .08
7 /1/2004 0 :00 Regular Billing -Storm Water Regular Billing -Storm Water $4 .16 $50 .91
7 /1/2004 0 :00 Regular Billing -Sewer Regular Billing -Sewer $25 .05 $46 .75
7 /1/2004 0 :00 Regular Billing -Water Regular Bill in g -Water $21.70 $21.70
5/4/2004 0 :00 Payment -Storm Water Payment -Storm Water ($4 .16) $0.00
5/4/2004 0 :00 Payment -Concrete Payment -Concrete ($5 .17) $4 .16
5/4/2004 0:00 Payment -Water Payment -Water ($10.48) $9 .33
5/4/2004 0 :00 Payment -Sewer Payment -Sewer ($28.32) $19 .81
4/1/2004 0 :00 Special Billing -Water Special Billing -Water $4.87 $48.13
4/1/2004 0 :00 Regular Billing -Concrete Regular Bill in g -Concrete $5 .17 $43.26
4/1/2004 0 :00 Regu lar Bill ing -Storm Water Regular Bill ing -Storm Water $4.16 $38 .09
4/1/2004 0 :00 Regular Billi ng -Sewe r Regular Billing -Sewer $28 .32 $33 .93
4/1/2004 0 :00 Regular Billin g -Water Regular Billing -Water $5 .61 $5 .61
2/24/2004 0 :00 Payment -Storm Water Payment -Sto rm Water ($4.16) $0.00
2/24/2004 0 :00 Payment -General Payment -General ($0 .43) $4 .16
2/24/2004 0 :00 Payment -Concrete Payment -Concrete ($5.30) $4 .59
2/24/2004 0 :00 Payment -Water Payment -Water ($17.07) $9 .89
2/24/2004 0 :00 Payment -Sewer Payment -Sewer ($21 .78) $26.96
2/17 /2004 0 :00 Late Charge -Other Late Charge -Other $0.43 $48 .74
2/16/2004 0 :00 Late Charge -Concrete Late Charge -Concrete $0 .13 $48 .31
1/1/2004 0:00 Regular Billing -Concrete Regular Billi ng -Concrete $5 .17 $48 .18
1/1/2004 0 :00 Regular Billing -Storm Water Regu lar Billi ng -Storm Water $4.16 $43 .01
1/1/2004 0 :00 Regular Billing -Sewer Regular Billin g -Sewer $21.78 $38 .85
1/1/2004 0 :00 Regular Billing -Water Regular Bill in g -Water $17.07 $17 .07
12/15/2003 0 :00 Payment -Storm Water Payment -Storm Water ($4 .16) $0 .00
12/15/2003 0 :00 Payment -General Payment -General ($0.47) $4 .16
12/15/2003 0:00 Payment -Concrete Payment -Concrete ($5 .30) $4 .63
12/15/2003 0 :00 Payment -Water Payment -Water ($18 .68) $9 .93
12/15/2003 0 :00 Payment -Sewer Payment -Sewer ($21 .78) $28 .61
11/17 /2003 0:00 Late Charge -Concrete Late Charge -Concrete $0 .13 $50.39
11/17 /2003 0 :00 Late Charge -Other Late Charge -Other $0.47 $50 .26
10/1/2003 0 :00 Regular Billing -Concrete Regular Billing -Concrete $5.17 $49 .79
10/1/2003 0 :00 Regular Billing -Storm Water Regular Bill ing -Storm Water $4.16 $44.62
10/1/2003 0 :00 Regular Billing -Sewer Regular Billin g -Sewer $21.78 $40.46
10/1/2003 0:00 Regular Billing -Water Regular Billing -Water $18.68 $18 .68
9/2/2003 0:00 Payment -Storm Water Payment -Storm Water ($4 .16) $0 .00
9/2/2003 0 :00 Payment -General Payment -General ($0.31) $4 .16
z -13
9/2/2003 0:00 Payment -Concrete Payment -Concrete ($5 .30) $4.47
9/2/2003 0:00 Payment -Water Payment -Water ($12 .24) $9 .77
9/2/2003 0 :00 Payment -Sewer Payment -Sewer ($21 .78) $22 .01
8/18/2003 0 :00 Late Charge -Concrete Late Charge -Concrete $0.13 $43.79
8/18/2003 0 :00 Late Charge -Other Late Charge -Other $0.31 $43.66
7 /1/2003 0 :00 Regular Billing -Concrete Regular Billing -Concrete $5 .17 $43 .35
7 /1/2003 0 :00 Regular Billing -Storm Water Regular Billing -Storm Water $4 .16 $38 .18
7 /1/2003 0 :00 Regu lar Billing -Sewer Regular Bi lling -Sewer $21.78 $34 .02
7 /1/2003 0 :00 Regular Billing -Water Regular Bil ling -Water $12 .24 $12 .24
5/5/2003 0 :00 Payment -Storm Water Payment -Storm Water ($4 .16) $0.00
5/5/2003 0 :00 Payment -Concrete Payment -Concrete ($5 .17) $4 .16
5/5/2003 0 :00 Payment -Water Payment -Water ($12 .24) $9 .33
5/5/2003 0 :00 Payment -Sewer Payment -Sewe r ($21.78) $21 .57
4/1/2003 0 :00 Regular Billing -Concrete Regular Billing -Concrete $5 .17 $43 .35
4/1/2003 0 :00 Regular Billing -Storm Water Regular Billing -Storm Water $4 .16 $38 .18
4/1/2003 0 :00 Regular Billing -Sewer Regular Bill ing -Sewer $21.78 $34 .02
4/1/2003 0:00 Regular Bi ll ing -Water Regular Bil ling -Water $12 .24 $12 .24
2/3/2003 0 :00 Payment -Storm Water Payment -Sto r m Water ($4.16) $0.00
2/3/2003 0 :00 Payment -Conc rete Payme nt -Concrete ($5 .17) $4 .16
2/3/2003 0 :00 Payment -Wate r Payme nt -Water ($10.63) $9.33
2/3/2003 0 :00 Payment -Sewer Payment -Sewer ($21.78) $19.96
1/1/2003 0 :00 Regular Bi ll ing -Concrete Regu lar Billi ng -Concrete $5 .17 $41.74
1/1/2003 0 :00 Regular Bill ing -Sto r m Water Regu lar Bill ing -Storm Water $4 .16 $36 .57
1/1/2003 0 :00 Regular Bil ling -Sewer Regu lar Bill ing -Sewe r $21.78 $32.41
1/1/2003 0 :00 Regu lar Billing -Wa t er Regular Bill ing -Wate r $10 .63 $10.63
11/1/2002 0 :00 Payment -Storm Water Payment -Storm Water ($4 .16) $0 .00
11/1/2002 0 :00 Payme nt -Concrete Payment -Concrete ($5 .17) $4 .16
11/1/2002 0 :00 Payment -Water Payme nt -Wate r ($25.12) $9 .33
11/1/2002 0 :00 Payment -Sewer Payment -Sew er ($18 .15) $34.45
10/1/2002 0 :00 Regular Billi ng -Conc r et e Reg ul ar Bill ing -Concre t e $5 .17 $52 .60
10/1/2002 0 :00 Regular Billing -Storm Water Regu lar Bi ll in g -Storm Wate r $4 .16 $47.43
10/1/2002 0 :00 Regular Billing -Sewer Regu lar Bill ing -Sewer $18 .15 $43.27
10/1/2002 0 :00 Regular Bill i ng -Water Regular Bill i ng -Water $25 .12 $25 .12
8/1/2002 0 :00 Payment -Storm Wate r Payment -Storm Water ($4 .16) $0 .00
8/1/2002 0 :00 Payment -Concrete Payment -Concrete ($5 .17) $4 .16
8/1/2002 0 :00 Payment -Sewer Payment -Sewer ($18 .15) $9 .33
8/1/2002 0 :00 Payment -Water Payment -Water ($18.68) $27.48
7 /1/2002 0 :00 Regular Bill i ng -Concrete Reg ul ar Bi ll in g -Concrete $5 .17 $46 .16
7 /1/2002 0 :00 Regular Bi lling -Storm Water Regular Bi ll i ng -Storm Wate r $4 .16 $40 .99
7 /1/2002 0 :00 Regular Bill i ng -Sewer Regu lar Bil lin g -Sewe r $18 .15 $36.83
7 /1/2002 0 :00 Regular Billi ng -Wate r Reg ul ar Bill ing -Wate r $18 .68 $18 .68
4/30/2002 0 :00 Payment -St orm Water Payment -St o r m Wat er ($4 .16) $0 .00
4/30/2002 0 :00 Payment -Concrete Payment -Concrete ($5.17) $4 .16
4/30/2002 0 :00 Payment -Water Payment -Water ($9 .02) $9 .33
4/30/2002 0 :00 Payment -Sewer Payment -Sewer ($18 .15) $18 .35
4/1/2002 0 :00 Regular Bil ling -Concrete Regu lar Billing -Concrete $5 .17 $36 .50
4/1/2002 0 :00 Regular Bi lling -Storm Water Regular Bill in g -Storm Water $4 .16 $31.33
4/1/2002 0 :00 Regular Bil li ng -Sewer Regula r Billing -Sewer $18.15 $27 .17
4/1/2002 0 :00 Regular Billi ng -Water Regular Bi ll i ng -Wate r $9 .02 $9 .02
3/21/2002 0 :00 Payment -Storm Water Payment -Storm Water ($4 .16) $0 .00
3/21/2002 0 :00 Payme nt -Gene r al Payment -Gen eral ($0.71) $4 .16
3/21/2002 0 :00 Payment -Conc rete Payment -Concrete ($6.38) $4.87
3/21/2002 0 :00 Payment -Wa t er Payment -W ater ($28.34) $11.25
3/21/2002 0 :00 Payment -Sewer Payment -Sewer ($18.15) $39 .59
2 ·-J LJ
2/19/2002 0 :00 Late Charge -Other Late Charge -Other $0 .71 $57 .74
2/18/2002 0:00 Late Charge -Concrete Late Charge -Concrete $0 .16 $57 .03
1/1/2002 0 :00 Regular Billing -Concrete Regular Billing -Concrete $5 .17 $56 .87
1/1/2002 0 :00 Regular Billing -Storm Water Regular Billing -Storm Water $4 .16 $51.70
1/1/2002 0 :00 Regular Billing -Sewer Regular Billi ng -Sewer $18 .15 $47.54
1/1/2002 0 :00 Regular Billing -Water Regular Billing -Water $28.34 $29.39
1/1/2002 0 :00 Balance Forward -Concrete Balance Forward -Concrete $1.05 $1.05
z -IS
Motion: Recommendation to Council to have the Mayor sign the letter to the Water
Conservation Board responding to comments received regarding
Englewood's September 2013 Water Conservation Plan.
Moved: Burns Seconded: Waggoner
Motion passed unanimously .
6. INTEREST ON LATE FEES.
The Board received a memo from John Bock regarding a citizen's complaint regarding interest
on late fees. The memo notes that while Municipal Code #12-ID-4 and 12-2-3G allows us to
collect interest, the Utilities Department has elected not to, but does collect delinquency charges
on an unpaid balance. John reviewed existing system for late fee requirements.
The Board reviewed a copy of a letter that the Utilities Department received from Mr. Jack
Derby regarding the same issue.
The Board discussed the concu1Ted to continue to charge later fees on delinquent accounts.
Motion: To continue interest on late fees as established.
Moved: Waggoner Seconded: Wiggins
Motion approved unanimously.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Motion: To move to adjourn to Executive Session.
Moved: Oakley Seconded: Habenicht
Motion passed unanimously.
Executive session began at 5:58 p.m.
2 -I~
Memo
To: John Bock, Utilities Manager of Administration
From: Coween Dickerson 2835 S. Penns ylvania St
Subject: Your failure to respond to my questions and request for info
Cc: Nancy Reid , Assi stant City Attorney
Not havi ng heard from you re my questions detailed in 2 faxes and 1 email, I herein
renew my questions and comments and add the following.
I went to the Englewood site re the Water & Sewer Board to check what was on the
agenda and review the minutes. I found that there is no decision posted on the agenda
item you claimed was a decision on my appeal. Your memo to Nancy Reid was posted. I
note the following:
1. My name and my question were not cited.
2. I never que stioned "interest". I asked that all late charges be removed, because I had
been told by (you) John Bock, on the phone they would be, because I did not receive the
bill(s) timely, your website did not record payments, I could not access the website for
days at a time, among others.
3 . You said no one could have told me the late charges would be removed, because no
matter the reason , it just was not done (even though it has been, even for me). You further
stated that the EMC had "almost the exact wording" of the state statute, of which you
read a small portion. I pointed out that I knew the statute and that almost is not exact and
that 1 word difference changes and can negate the "letter" of the law. I further pointed
out that state statute prohibited charging penalties (late charges) on late charges. That is
the statute I cited. You said that you would not argue the matter with me but would refer
to the City attorney and let me know what they had to say.
Your memo to Nancy Reid does not state the issue I raised and is misleading at best,
whether or not inadvertent.
1. I never complained that you were charging interest on late fees. I complained that
you had sent me a late/disconnection notice on $22.xx accumulated late fees,
which consisted of late fees that should have been removed as promised, and late
fees on late fees, which are prohibited by state law.
2. You told me that upon receiving payment, late charges are satisfied first, to which
I have replied orally and in writing , is not in conformance with consumer rights,
generally accepted accounting principles or law. You wrote in your memo to Reid
z -17
that "any associated late fees are satisfied are also paid'', so late fees are charged
on late fees by your admission. You wrote in your letter dated 1116114 that water
charges are satisfied last, clearly contradicting your statement to me, to Nancy
Reid.
There are problems with what you wrote to Reid. Your statements do not
"associate" any late fees to the individual charges. They are shown as a lump sum
as late charge above the line before the current bill line item detail. Even your
website shows current bill amounts only and no "associated" late charges
identified as being charged on individual amounts. Nor are payments shown as
applied to individual line items in t he order described. In no case can there be any
late charges associated with anything but water charges, and then not until the
next billing period if the prior current bill was paid in full before the late charges
were assessed. However, water charges are listed first and there is no explanation
of how you apply payments. You have gone farther in my case. You have
threatened disconnection for failure/refusal to pay late charges and late charges on
late charges, even though there is no such statement on your bills nor law
permitting such action for non payment of late fees, much less for the prohibited
late fees on late fees.
3. Your final statement/question is incomplete and incomprehensible. Making the
assumption that you meant "are we only governed by the CRS"? The answer is
yes. You are justifying your incorrect, confused billing practices on what you are
allowed to do under the CRS, but ignoring the clear prohibitions against what you
admit, however inadvertently, that you are doing. You don't even follow what is
stated on the back of your statements.
Your 2 responses to me did not and do not address my "appeal". I have no way of
knowing what the alleged decision by the Water & Sewer Board really is, as it has not
been posted, whatever it was was not based on MY question and "appeal" and therefore
has nothing to do with me. MY question and appeal of late charges is still open, valid and
unanswered. I cannot "appeal" a decision that is not applicable to me to an unnamed
court. No court or even Board has made a decision on a case brought by me, so I cannot
appeal to another court of jurisdiction, nor should I have to. Under the circumstances, a
court is not the appropriate jurisdiction. Your billing/payment application process as
described by you, is just wrong. Please correct the back of your statements. What you
claimed in your memo to Nancy Reid and what you wrote me are different and neither is
reflective of what is on the back of your billing statements, and none are what actually
has happened in my case. Also, there is at least 1 misused word that negates your
intention to relieve you of responsibility. "Accessed" is not the same or even similar
meaning to "assessed" which is what was possibly intended.
I expect you to cease charging late charges on late charges and credit off the $22.90 late
charge balance charged on my account.
2 -IB
Cathy Burrage
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Leigh Ann Hoffhines
Tuesday, February 18 , 2014 8:27 AM
Stu Fonda
John Bock; Nancy Reid; Gary Sears; Michael Flaherty; Lindsay Von Colditz ; Leigh Ann
Hoffhines; Sue Carlton-Smith ; Cathy Burrage; Dan Brotzman
FW : late ch gs and correspondence -Council Request 14-025
bock to reid & water board 1211101302122014_0000.jpg ; bock re decision
jan16201402122014_0000.jpg; my Answer jan24 to jan16 .doc; Faxed jan31.doc ; Feb 12 2014
bock.doc
We received the following Council Request from Council Member Jefferson last week . I have added it to the list: 14-025
{Water & Sewer Bill Late Fees Inquiry), assigned to Utilities.
Thanks, Leigh Ann
Le igh Ann Hoffhines
Englewood City Manager's Office
-----Or iginal Message-----
From: Joe Jefferson
Sent : Thursday, February 13 , 2014 6:44 PM
To : Leigh Ann Hoffh i nes
Subject : FW: late chgs and correspondence
Please make request . Can she appear in front of the water board on her issue as she claims that they misunderstood her
issue over her late fees?
From: cadic kers@juno.com [cadickers@juno .com]
Sent : Wednesday, February 12, 2014 7:03 PM
To : Joe Jefferson
Subject: late chgs and correspondence
Mr. Jefferson :
Thank you for agreeing to review and attempt to assist me in this matter. I have tried to attach the written
correspondence in some sort of order. I will be forwarding the email I sent in response to Back's letter of January 29
telling me that I had to appeal the water board's decision of my appeal to district court separately {in which I pointed
out, again that MY appeal of late charges was not heard or decided on and asked what was district court and how could I
appeal something that had nothing to do with me?).
I made a phone call some months and several billing cycles ago regarding the late charges and my difficulties with the
web site and mail and the man who identified himself as John was most agreeable and promised to credit off the late
charges . It never happened. I continued to pay the current bill . When the amount exceeded $22 .00, I got a late notice,
the first I had received in many billing cycles . I called and ta l ked to John Bock, who denied that I was promised a credit of
late fees and then asserted many things, among them that late fees were credited first out of payments. After I read him
and cited the CRS statute that prohibited charging late fees on late fees , he blustered about not arguing with me and
that he would refer it to the city attorney and let me know . He also left me a message that he would put me on the
agenda {he never did nor my issue), nor did he forward any response from the City attorney. He did however, in
response to my concerns over the threatened disconnection over the 22.90 late charges unpaid, said that no action
would be taken (no red tag, disconnection or more late charges) while "under appeal". I was redtagged soon after and
additional late charges were added to the late charges. He apologized, said it was a mistake and credited the $5 fee
1
'Z -19
which is obscene in any case, esp for such a small amount, but d id not credit the additional late charges . My account was
shown as "scheduled for disconnection" unt il I reluctantly paid $10 towards the late charges to get it under the apparent
cutoff.
I found his somewhat garbled memo to the City attorney on line as part of the documents presented to the Water board
1/14/2014. Nothing from the City attorney in response .
My memo faxed to him today again details my problems with his lack of knowledge and inconsistencies and
contradictions.
From : cad ickers@juno .com [cadic kers@juno.com]
Sent : Wednesday, February 12, 2014 7:09 PM
To: Joe Jefferson
Subject: Fw: letter dated January 29
My ema i l to Bock i n response to his letter dated Jan 29 , in accordance w ith h is last sentence . Guess " .... please feel free
to contact me" does not mean he wi l l respond or as sist m e in any way.
Date : Fri , 31 Jan 2014 21:21 :22 GMT
To : jboc k @englewoodgov.org
Subject : letter dated January 29
Mr. Bock ,
The Water and Sewer Board d id NOT r e nder a dec ision on the appeal of late charges on late charges, according to your
letter. The decision was made on i nt erest, which I d id not appeal. The decision cannot be fi na l on MY appeal as it was
not made on MY appea l, nor was it made i n li ght of the state law on late charges on late charges wh ich is proh i b ited, nor
was it made on the fact that your website and bill i ng pract ices are faulty and not w ithin the law . I was not made aware
of this "decision" in a timely fashion, nor does it have anything to do w ith my appeal.
What "District Court" and why should I have to appeal to them since the decision was not made on the facts or grounds
of MY initial appeal?
Coween Dickerson
2835 S. Pennsy lvania
Englewood , CO 80113
303 7815242
2-20
2
c T y () F
January 16. 20 I 4
Co\\·een Dickerson
2835 S . Pennsylvania St.
ENGLEWOOD CO 80113-16-+5
RE : Charging Interest on Late Fees
Dear ?v1s. Dickerson;
E N L E
Thank you for expressing your concern regarding the City 's late fee practices.
() 0
At their January 14. 2014 meeting the Englewood Water and Sewer Board took up your
question about charging interest on late fees .
A.ft er some discussion and consideration of the facts the Board reached the following
conclusions:
l. The Engkwood .tviunicipal Code (Eiv1C) and the State Statute contain almost the
exact same wording.
2. The provisions of the DvfC do not violate the State Statute.
3. Although both the DvfC and the State Statute gi\'e the City the right to charge
interest on the .. amount due·' the City has ekcted not to charge any interes t on any
amounts due at all.
4. \\'hen a payment is received, the billing system will satisfy the v;ater charges last.
For this reason it is possible that late fees can be charged on late fees. Again, no
interest has ever been charged.
5. Both the Pv1C and the State Statutes allow late fees up to 5~10 per month or
fraction thereof. The City only charges 2.5%.
In conclusion, the Board agreed with how the Depanment is administering the past due
fees and directed the Department staff to cont inue in that maimer.
Siticerel~·
.. //)if<,
~r6hn Bock
Utilities Manager of Administration
303 -762 -2643
Fax 303 -783 -6894
z -2 I
D
Faxed 1131
I just sent you an email in response to your letter dated 1129, received 1131.
In addition, I just paid the current amount due online and noted that the account status
was "scheduled for disconnection". Thi s is wrong and I want it corrected immediately,
since the red tag was issued in error and you did credit the charge as shown on pmt
history.
Btw , I noted that in 2011, 2 small late charges were credited, upon my complaint, despite
your assertion that late charges could not be credited. All late charges assessed to my
account can and should be credited. Your billing practices are confu sed and faulty at
best.
I noted that your website has changed. Time will tell if it is for the better. I had 3
instances today of not being able to get on the payment site (unexpected error).
2 -22
.. , . ~
March 3, 2014
Englewood Sanitation District
cl o City of Englewood
HJCalibre
Re: 1424 E . Stanford Ave .-Sanitary Sewer/Ejector Station Code Variance
To whom it may concern:
This letter is intended to summarize the City requested code variance to an external private ejector station
located at 1424 East Stanford Avenue , Cherry Hills Village. The fol lowing will provide background of
the existing conditions, propo se d conditions and contingency provisions. See attached sketch as a
reference to this letter.
Ex isting Co nditi o ns:
o 1424 East Stanford Avenue ( 1424) Residence has a gravity sanitary sewer service out fa lling through
4500 South Lafayette ( 4500) site as shown on the attached plan. Service line through 4500 has an
existing easement and agreement and will be revised for new location .
o 1424 's existing service is comprised of cast iron, plastic and clay p ipes all in poor condition.
o Slope from the basement of 1424 to sewer mai n in Lafayette is 0.003%.
Pr o pose d Co nd ition:
o 4500 propose s to construct a new residentia l home which will necessitate the existing sewer service to
be relocated .
o Alternatives were explored to gravity service 1424 to the north and east into Che rry Hills Sanitation
District however the construction costs made this prohibitive along with requiring a transfer between
Sanitation Districts requiring added expenses and time .
o Alternative s were explored for installing the ejector station within 1424 however no room was
available without major renovations and with the need of adding the outbuilding the ejector station
was needed at the junction of 1424 service outfall and the outbui lding.
o The current plan proposes a new PVC four-inch (4") gravity sewer service line at an industry standard
of 2% from both the existing re si dence and the existing main in Lafayette to an ejecto r station located
at the rear of 1424 . The ejector station will facilitate lifting the approximate ten-foot (10') of elevation
difference created with the new situation.
o An outbuilding located at the rear of 1424 will also be picked up at the station.
o The ejector station will provide the following features or equivalent equals:
o LE4 I A duplex (2) pump s which will alternate/cycle in use .
o 1100 series storage tank, approximately 110 ga llons or rough ly 4 hours of average day use.
o Concrete manhole to facilitate the grade change .
o Visual alarm, a red flashing light.
o Audible alarm located within 1424 .
Co nting e ncy Pr ov is ions :
Potential contingency provi s ions associated with the ejector station include the fo l lowing :
o Two pumps . Pumps will alternate or cycle between uses, extending pump life and reliability in case
one pump fail s .
o Alarm system. A visual , red flashing light and an audible alarm located in the home will provide a
two stage notificati on system for the homeowner or neighbors of an issue with the station.
Page I of 2
3 -I
HJ Calibre
o Site spill mitig ation. lfthe pump s go offline any back-up offlow would occur within the home rather
than spilling to the surface due to the elevation of the basement facilities being lower than the surface
opening of the station . The station will handle about 110 gallons along with additional storage in the
service line prior to backing up into the basemen t and could provide about 4-8 hours of storage
depending upon usage. This situation would be similar to a pump being located within the home.
We believe this letter generally summarizes the situation and conditions per this reque st. Feel free to
contact me at (303) 257-7653 or taj @calibre.us.com should you have any questions regarding this letter
or are in need of additional materials.
Sincerely,
CALIBRE ENGINEERl ~G , INC.
-~~/' // -
/ ,,
"// / /i
; .{_,,; , ,:// ... <://<y ( ___ . .--~··
Todd A. Johnson, P.E.
Vice President -Director of Professional Services
Attachments
Page 2of2
3 z
~
' \!\)
WAlf'<llNV l !llb
SEA\/tC[ INV 2015i
R(WOVC [ltlS'llNC
SCR\o'ICC l lNC S
NEW COMNCCTIONS
511"1.J.. 9( ,. fROM
[lUSnN<i COHt«.:CTIONS.
lilo'JH IN V 1!1 6.t
SUh'\C[ INV 206:1
SlRCtl CUT PER
CHY Of' Ol(Rtl'!'
HILLS WJ.ACC
""
'
" : "7' .. ,
'
....
i::
~\
"' ht
~('
I'
It.'
['', ...
( ""-,
I '""' I ~,""-
',""-,
' ""-
... ',""-
4500 S. LAF~YETTE STREET ~,;;"\,_
'"'
''\.
......... ...· .......
·:--'%
•
~
"'
,.
'
1424 E. STANFORD AVENUE
+
G
~
PfloPOSCO 4° P'I( 0 :ni;
""-,
\
'
0
0
'~
' " ' x '.~ 0
. '~· ,,'~
'{' "'
0
........... '"')'
+
0
CONHC CT 10 n SANITARY
~f I
"°"
(11.ISflr+C .. s(lll(R
TQB( A8~0
IN P\..AC(
I '·
.'~ :""-
C/0 (TYP)
C.OUROlfo .. 1£ S(MVICE
C()o<N(CTION llll TW
M(.,,...'1'£R COH~"CTWC
'"
' " '
. .'-. _ ~ _ "_ _ _ _ L __ . ~ .••• -~ --I 'Ji:' ~" " '~ ~\.,, "' "' ~·· "" ..._ ~ . • {t. • ~I PftoPOSCD 4" "'\
1000' • 1200 I C/O Pl(; 0 2'.i ~ -----------,......-------------+-----1-1----,-----T--r-I \ PRQPOS(O l"J" 0 •"J'0 I UT\_l1l" [~WCNI
C/0 ! \ PROPOSCO ,. PVC o nt
X-Propou d6S d"'1i! ~ T ;mCalibre
NEll\NYE R 4500 (-""'""'"'_,,,._._ L,.4 ~--"''11 s..r..,"'9
PROPOSCD OUPLCll Sl:WMiC (.CCTION
• U:UA
• 1100 SCK S "'fH CA IJ)( O'TCNSION
• [lli)PlO Pl.J I.If> COJ.I fHOl llll lH "1..•.Rt.1
INV II! H (NW)
lfo!V i 4.t:(t-1 ()
FC Xl.t (4" 480'tl£ CllSTINC CR1'0£)
AJ"f>ftQl(IWAT[ L0C Al)l,)N Of'"
Uf l SU.flON fO 8( LOC "'fEO
AT IH fEASCCT Cl" SCR""CC WAINS
LEGEND
l!Qw/PRQP(MIY llN!: ------
pqOPfi!h 80!....0AMY --------
r ... Sl ... [NI -----
PQ()P)AN1 t ... lfY ... (\1¥fM ...... 1•1 ~
l'J,/l)ll ~ ....... r .. 1h ')i lllt W Uf A N()l.ol-~~---
l• WAl(l.i U AIN
f l SAMl l ..,llf Sf Ylt AC.
N ~-~S...:_
l CONIPArlOH 10 Cfluli()IN A1l Ul U<>tll!ON Atli'OYAL
.V.0 'c(f>lAfl ... INI '"''" """""''t'{R :Qf1 hlAll!NG. INC:
\ l.0Nl RAl'.10R 10 ll!J.1"• 'iAN;ll"R• <;(""'A (OWN((l!Oh
0-\)<Nl'i AJ\lll Nl)IU' < o,i(;< .. 11~ .,. .,,,., ('11!,o...All'ANll('!i
LOC Alll)o.t Of AH \ J l'!ihlW(, ,111._.l1f';> {l~lY Al( ~
~IC) S•tAI\ tit tli1Nl111tO ll>l VllllfltO 1:1'
LONIA.\C l VW !•R10fl 10 "C>riol10llf"ll, Cl)NSlRUCT!Ot..r,
Qlll)ll[)l ""'l•iOl ... A llN••l '> .~ .... f{lf:l ... A ti(l"I
(ONT .\Cl O(Nll!lt 1t<!I fl Ultl i fY Cll {!l,JI'
1 t\00 -•n2 l\11'1 1 (Ill L1 1(.A "l ,lo.( 1 f'Aty A l( (N flh
~ 0 1\lfW AS'>ilCI A lt O fNll llt :> ...,lHIN II* LllM IS Of
lUN~IH UL 1'°"' htl ..:llN!"'A,_ 'Ofl ~U•ll l:k AA lt.0.
IVll COS ! Of u1 ... ov ... 1 ~l•l •'l "!"'I AN D Olt •Y
Nl..!1'1(0 TO V "~liMl(ll ((1·,ltM, ,_l)N!)llJDNS wut.Rt:
11;{ CO....l".\ll~ •1,...-)S('.lNllfi'>l.....,OoSfa[P A ~lfS
lttt 1 5,H Alt i4{ llt l>/Jotll [; '"'Utf\!A!l 1 • l(l h<I
t-..E:l~
' 111( (Ot.;l:J"(TQll '>'•"! L •'l~l i ll'!" "I l ¥1'1'.)R ..
NlCf SS ... Rf 10 COUPtfll h1( w()Ro. <,ilOwt; ()f,f lHf
i'l "N5 {)II Ot '>t.R >l>t O •N lt11 '>i't1..~1CA1M.INS ltil 1'
'>A l61 .\C IORl t.A Ati:,.!M .;NI.IS'> 01!1'1<""°5.i l'W0YI0£0
ht( COtil!tA(l{)M •.11At1 IUOIN1'.;t1 All ""l(MIALS.
l Ol)li"utN I. IUO..S, 1 A (M.~ ANI) "'ff..()i.NIAl'i IQ
(Ot,ol'll I( 1 .. r W('IR~ ft'. RI 01SrPI ''''4Clt5 AR(
f0VNO ON >'!AN" <JOf I'll 1A11-. <;t,.'WIN ON flilt f>\.ANS
l1tl t.:OoolifA.CIOll )tlAll .. ,,1~ Y hli.. lNLJNl(lt PH~
10 ll(r;;.-c; (~'>l'IU(.hO•• htf t ONIR"CTOR 9<.\ll
tlf"Alt "" f Vll coo;;• ()I '/t .. tlvA•. "'''l.O.Cf i.l(.N T,
l"lfl •Y, APil) .. ,")ftj(Jl ... ht)fo.i 1<1 1 ~1 1 0 !0 IA.!l!lllf 10
k!Vll.W"t.t l'I A .. ')
fl ~A..,.I A R1 Sfv.t:R CONSIW\J(ltON '>l•Atl OC P[ll CHY
OI [Nfilfllj()O() SlANl)•lm' ""'O Sl'i i'lflC..,h(WS
1 lilGlll-Of -WAl/S lll(f I ~ON':>IWU(,:f •CW SHALL 0C P (R
Ul' Of (ll(kln •OllS Yllt A.r.I SI ANO ... Fl'OS A.Ill()
<;l'fC'lfoC •TIQl,t ,.
K l!YMOTES...:_
0 DO '401 OIST\~ll l lli<;Tio.G ll>i\:f
0 D uc-.r HK,.,CH 00•
0 DO NOi OIS IUWR !Rlf S
@ VNCC
CALL BEFORF
YOU DI C.
8 11
OR
1-8 00-922-1987
U t ili t y Not i fic ation
Center o f COi orado
......... '91ralM Ottk• lOl-2.)2 -199•
12600 • Cotta• ,.,. . Suitt e -J10
Lo ... •OO<I. Co 8021!)
C.e.u. 2 809NESS o n <;> .... AOVAHCC f:l(r()H( YOU OIG.
(;lllAD£ OM rxc ... v ... 1c rOR n< i.i ... Ri<ING or
l.A'IOCMGROUHO t.ICWOCR Ulll.lll(S
CAleRt: [NGlfol([AING, tt+C. ASSIJt.ICS i'lfO ACsPONS181UTV
FOA EJUSllNG UllUh' l0C"11QNS (HOR!ZONIAL .\t4l
ll[AflC Al) me [lllSTIHC UT'UlC S 5HOMt ON n.s DR AWING
H"\IC BCC N Pl.OmDfROt.I T1'4C Bf..S1 A\IA.ll.Al:llC
INf"OAw ... nON II !S. ~\ICM. IH( R[~S181ll t'I' r:1I' l'M[
CONIR...CTOR 10 f"1.:LO ~Ftf"Y 1liC lOC:AllOHS or "'Ll
ununcs pqj(lA TO lliC COl.lt.l(NC{W(N T or N H
CONSlltUCnoN A.C1111111[~
551
_!__
_!_
4500 SOUTH LAFAYETTE STREET
MCCLINTOCK RESIDENCE
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
FEBRUARY 17. 201 4
~
.·
_ _:__.,. -----
DONALD E. MARTURANO
ATTORNEY AT LAW
P.O. BOX 2858
CENTENNIAL, COLORADO 80161-2858
(303) 797-6200
FAX: (303) 797-6240
March 4 , 2014
City of Eng lewood
Water and Sewer Board
1000 Englewood Parkway
Englewood , Colorado 80110
Re : South Englewood Sanitation District No . 1 (the "District")
Contiguous Residential Properties with i n Cherry Hills Village -1424 S. Stanford Ave.
("Stanford") and 4500 S. Lafayette St. ("Lafayette"), both currently Owned by Susan P.
Woodard -Lafayette is Currently Under Contract to Richard L. and Peggy M. McClintock,
set to have Closed February 25 , 2014
Specifically, the Relocation of an Easement for a 4-lnch Sanitary Sewer Service Line from
the Main Residence of Stanford and the Reconstruction of Stanford's Sanitary Sewer
Service Line with New PVC Conduit at a 2% Grade , with Top and Bedding Materials from
the Main Residence at Stanford to a Duplex/Ejector Pump System South of the Auxiliary
Outbuilding at Stanford, just North of the Common Property Line between Stanford and
Lafayette , continuing in the Relocated Easement of Lafayette to the Exit of this Service
Line from Lafayette and Connection to the District 8-inch Auxiliary Sanitary Sewer
Transmission Line of the District in Lafayette Street. The Existing Service Line for
Lafayette would be Relocated approximately Three to Six Feet North and Parallel to its·
Current Course. Both Existing Service Lines would be Capped at the District Line in the
Street. New Taps for each of the Two Lines, Stanford and Lafayette, approximately Three
Feet further South and North, respectively , than currently Tapped.
Dear Water and Sewer Board Members :
As the attorney for the District, I write . Attached is the most current construction plan for the referenced
util ity sanitary sewer service upgrades on the prope rti es , primarily Stanford , albeit m inimally for Lafayette
also ; both properties are included with in the Distr ic t and both are within the corporate limits of Cherry Hil ls
Village .
Serv ice Line and Its Operation . The san itary sewer serv ice line and its operation for Stanford is and has
been problematic from the outset of Mrs . Woodard 's ownership of that property. The grade is a problem ,
and the use of three different materials for the pipe sections of the ex isting san it ary sewer service is not
recommended , with bedding material under and adjacent to the existing serv ice line appear ing
questionab le. Tree root intrusion has been observed in certain sect ions of the existing service line , and
it s grade is not , by any means , a constant 2%. More often than not , the line is less than the 2% required
Alternatives to re construct this service line us ing the best of every conceivable current remedial
reconstruction processes have been explored . The on ly efficient and workable resolution requires a
duplex/ejector pump system , per the attached plan . You have previously seen a plan very simil ar to this ,
3-L/
City of Englewood
Water and Sewer Board
March 4 , 2014
Page 2
which had been subm itted . This attached plan is a minor modification of the previous plan. Obviously ,
gravity is always the preferred system , but the grade of the floor drain in the ma in residence of Stanford
and the level of the District's invert in Lafayette St., where the Stanford sewer service will connect to the
District line , precludes a 2% grade without the duplex/ejector pump system ; hence , the reconstruction of
the sanitary sewer service at a proper grade , with correct bedding materials , using the most up-to-date
methods of installation and eng ineering , augmented by the duplex/ejector pump system , is submitted.
As this letter goes out, I have learned that the City of Cherry Hi lls Village is not approving the
reconstruction of the service line as proposed. I spoke with the building inspector for Cherry Hills Village
approximately ten days ago , and we had a lengthy conversation on all the ifs , ands or buts about this
service line reconstruction . That Cherry Hills Village official and myself understood that the engineering ,
the work , and all inspections would be required and would be observed ; and , on that basis , that is how
the District views this proposal -to be approved if all codes , rules and regulations of Cherry Hills Village
are followed . When I spoke with that official previously , I had no doubt we were on the same page and
am at a loss to understand how and for what reason the Village has changed its position.
The current owners of the properties , on this basis, submit this plan for a variance to the City of
Englewood , Water and Sewer Board.
With best regards ,
Donald E. Maturano , Attorney for
South Englewood Sanitation District No .
DEM:de
Ends.las stated
l j j I . ., ~ !
' 0
it ;
~ .
~
!
.~ ~~
~,.) ~~
~i ~~ UM
~~ ~i 0 , 3"
~ ~; s~
~~ ~i §i ~~
"i r
'i ·~ 2i
!~ I ~ ~i C< u<
~~ ~~ ~ ~~
w
:::> z w > ci:
c er:
0
I&. z
ci: ...
"' Iii ..,
"' ..,
;'·
/ . /
.. ~ /
/
/
,
. .?:l!i ~~
s a 3~:.~H ~,..~~ ~!~l!: --~~ ~~~~ .il~~~~~ ~l'"'.i~:p~~!~ ~~~~$3!1 Di :ii ... fJ "" 2~;-!:~~~~~~~ :JC~.A~ ... -~ 'i!~i 'i~ :r4'.~~~!! O:uci ~'i ~~ ..... '"'AJl"I§~ ~-2~·3~~~~-~ ·~~·i=~·~i~; ~~H~~:§~~;,_ ~-~~~ '~~8-~~-~i~:~~~~~i~~~
I
, , I
/
/
0
/
/
/
~<~"'. fii-"o
. c! I£;;;~~§~~ 11§~~·u·r"· ,~-i~>j~ ~~.: .t..,~~~~~1~§..::? ·~~"¥~~ -~iil 3 ~~ 1· • ~~ ~!!t~ ~'i~~~~ g:z:;~t·~~~~ ·~ilJ>"~~ ~!!~ ~· »3a -~~"H u9~>C-~~C~~ ~j~~~!~i~~i~~ ~~i~~!l~~~~~~ :=J ,!~,:::: ... u ... ~~~::i ;
/
/
/
/
... w w a:: ...
"' w
E
~
I&.
j
ai
0
0
"' ..,
/
/
/
/
/
5
t~
~~
]~
~~
~9 -· ~~
§1 ..
~~
i" • 1 ..
~~
;;
~~ ..
Ji@ I'-§i ~~ CXl 8bl!i ,.... O"J ~-~ 3~~00 ~ ~ §~ ~ N ~ ~~ @ ~ ~~ ~
., u
;:::;-,... " ~ 0 ~. ~ ~ ;~6 'o · ~! ~ bl Y ~~ >l .... ~ ....
"'i ~ 0 ~ i ii ~ ll: g g
0ee
I M
L---------------------~· --·•--a • ------z-
~
~ ~
> -~§ • L§-j ~ "l "" ~ i~h Ms
3 -~
! s
0 z
"
5
~
~
~
, " I ~. ~ 1u~~ , ~b ~~ <~! ;~ ~~-~6~ h ,,~·~-,, ~~~ :I~ ~~1; 1i ~~~ ~~i H-f'S~5 ~f § ~ . J:;~ . 2 'f~'"'
•I 'i ~»o~ •; p, a 12!§ e 2 ~ t'" ·-· , a'•ei9 8 i! 1~ ~-~; j~ _;~·~€~
.3 ~;3~;~~ ~-; ~o
~i a~~ ·•' ~c ~ •O<
-I -I
""" en en
I-w w
0::
I-
I/)
w
I-
I-w > <(
LI. s
:x: ...
::;) .
0
I/)
0
0
ll'l
'¢
! . .
i
j
" w
~ w
I/I
> ii:: < !:: z <
I/I
Cl w
I/I
0 a.
0
" a.
i
I §
I ~
I ~
··a-L·" -.i:iw:r
iW'li\1 t1Wti:::t '11.'f'CIW"ld ~·Al:BUO"
!LWfri dfi&iii• i&Li&fu3$J&ijjjl\0\1\jft11 l-tl.Y4
Date
May 13 , 2014
INITIATED BY
Utilities Department
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Agenda Item Subject
Purchase of Jet/Vacuum
Vactor Truck
STAFF SOURCE
Stewart H. Fonda , Director of Utilities
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Council approved purchase of a Vactor flusher truck in August 1995 in the amount of
$142,750.
Council approved the purchase of a Vactor flusher truck in January, 2003 in the amount of
$143,364.
Council approved the purchase of a sewer line cleaning /vacuuming machine (Vactor truck) in
May , 2006 to Williams Equipment in the amount of $149,600.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
At their March 11 , 2014 meeting , the Englewood Water and Sewer Board recommended
Council approval , by motion of the purchase of a combination unit jet cleaning /vacuuming
machine (Vactor truck). Staff recommends awarding the bid to Williams Equipment in the
amount of $278 ,700.
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
The proposed combination unit jet cleaning/vacuuming truck is designed to simultaneously
clean and remove all liquids and solids from sanitary sewers , storm drain lines and other
conduits. This piece of equipment is necessary for routine and emergency sewer line
maintenance and will be replacing the existing outdated unit. This is part of the planned CERF
replacement program.
The proposed combination unit jet cleaning/vacuum truck that is being requested will allow the
crew to remove the blockage at the first point of contact rather than having to flush the debris
to the nearest trunk line. The proposed combination truck will allow removal of the blocking
solids at the point of the problem rather than have to go through entire system to the treatment
plant.
Requests for Bid were published and seven responses were received.
y -/
Faris Machinery Company
Williams Equipment Co.
McCandless Truck Center
Macdonald Equ ipment Co .
Volvo Trucks w/McDonald Equip .
Kais Brothers Equipment Co.
Global Machinery
Volvo Trucks w/Kois Equip .
$276 ,937.00
$278 ,700.00
$282 ,862 .00
$284 ,538.00
$305 ,210 .00
$309 ,056.00
$324,400.00
$329 ,728 .00
Utilities staff determined that Williams Equipment (VacCon) is the lowest , most technically
acceptable bidder.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Williams Equipment Company (VacCon) is the recommended bidder at $278 ,700.00 . The
new vacuum /flusher truck will replace unit #1405 , which is a 2004 Freightliner flusher unit.
This is a normal CERF replacement , with funds available in the CERF fund and approved in
the 2014 budget.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Bid Proposal Tabulation
SE RVI CENTER GA RA GE
SUMMARY SPECIFICATION SHEET
FOR
NEW VEHICLES
ENGLEWOOD BID# --~IF~B~-~14_-~00~3 __________ _
MANUFACTURER OF VEHICLE Fr ei Q:htlinerN acCon
MODEL OF VEHICLE VacCon Combination Unit
AIR CONDITIONING YES NO
AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION YES NO
POWER WINDOWS YES NO
POWER DOOR LOCKS YES NO
4 WHEEL DRIVE YES NO
FLEX FUEL OPTION YES NO
CERF REPLACEME T YES NO
NEW AD DITION TO FLEET YES NO
DEPARTMENT VEHICLE ASSIGNED TO 411605 -Utilities
COMMENTS: This unit will repl ace Unit 1405, a 2004 FreiQ:htliner flusher unit
that has met the minimum requirements of hours of use, maintenance dollars expended,
and years of service for replacement. This purchase was ap proved in the 2014 budQ:et
and funds are available in the Capital Equipment R eplacement F und (CERF). The cost of
the replacement unit is $278.700.00.
LJ -3
-t
\
-t
City of Englewood Bid Tabulation Sheet
Bid Opening Date: February 19, 2014 2:00 P.M. MST
ITEM BID: IFB-14-003 Sewer Jet and Vacuum Truck
Sewer Jet and
Vendor Vacuum Truck
Volvo Trucks of Denver w/McDonald Equipment
7250 E 56th Ave .
Commerce City, CO 80022
303-289-4707
Greg Leupold -Sales $ 305 ,210 .00
Volvo Trucks of Denver w/Kois Equipment
7250 E 56th Ave .
Commerce City, CO 80022
303-289-4707
Greg Leupold -Sales $ 329,728 .00
Macdonald Equipment Co .
7333 Hwy 85/PO Box 1865
Commerce City, CO 80022
303-287 -7 401
Bill Phelps -General Manager $ 284,538.00
Kais Brothers Equipment Company
5200 Colorado Blvd.
Commerce City, CO 80022
303-298-7370
Jesse McKinley -Central Colorado Sales $ 309 ,056.00
Faris Machinery Company
5770 East 17th Ave.
Commerce City, CO 80022
303-289 -57 43
Larry Johnson -Environmental Division Mgr $ 276 ,934.00
Williams Equipment, LLC
9670 Dallas St. Unit J
Henderson, CO 80640
I Apparent Low Bidder I
t'°dll!S &
Operations Service
Manua ls X3 Manual Tota l B id Exceptions :
25 ,5001b rear spring
w/helper in lue of
Included Included $ 305,210 .00 30 ,000lb
Included Included $ 329 ,728.00 None
Included Included $ 284,538 .00 Please see attached
No exceptions, see attached
Included Included $ 309 ,056 .00 where we exceed specifications
Water storage tanks : no top mount
inspection port Water pump: 2500
PSI , Vacuum system: fan housing
has auto flushout system , Hose Reel:
Incl uded Included $ 276,937.00 No quick disconnect system
Chassis Bid : Freightliner 114SD
Date
April 7, 2014
INITIATED BY
Utilities Department
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Agenda Item Subject
Two 3 Million-Gallon S.
Clarkson Water Storage
Roof Rehab. Project ITB-002
STAFF SOURCE
Stewart H. Fonda , Director of Utilities
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Council approved, at their March 16, 2004 meeting, the bid award for one tank repair for the
west 3-million-gallon S. Clarkson reservoir to RN Civil Construction in the amount of
$201, 173.00.
Council approved , at their September 19, 2005 meeting, the bid award for the one tank repair
for the east Clarkson Street two 3-million-gallon reservoir to Premier Spec. constructors in the
amount of $261,285.00
RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Water and Sewer Board , at their March 11, 2014 meeting , approved the bid from Moltz
Construction, Inc. as the lowest acceptable bidder at $1, 188 ,500.00 for repairing the two 3MG
water storage tank roof slabs.
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
The two east Clarkson Street 3-million-gallon covered reservoirs, located two blocks east of
the intersection of Clarkson and Sunset Ridge in the City of Greenwood Village, was originally
construction in 1952 and 1956 as a water storage facility for treated water for the City of
Englewood. The tanks provide fire protection and back-up water during power outages for
Englewood's Zone 1, which encompasses 60% of the City.
An inspection of the 3-million-gallon tanks determined that the floor slabs, columns and walls
were in good condition. The tank roof slabs, however , have deteriorated and are in poor
condition, and if left unrepaired , deterioration will become more extensive. Substantial repair
and protection measures are recommended to extend the serviceability of the tanks. These
repairs should extend the service life of the tanks by at least 20 years.
5-1
The bid proposed will include piping modifications , structural repairs , and lightweight concrete
installation with a PVC membrane roof system .
FINANCIAL IMPACT
This project requires two specialty contractors that are certified by the project manufacturer.
Two bids were received , with one being a "no bid." The Utilities Engineer determined that
Moltz Construction , Inc . was the lowest acceptable bidder at $1 , 188 ,500 . The engineer's
estimate was $1 ,200 ,000.00 . $1 ,600 ,000.00 was budgeted in the Utilities Fund.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Bid Tabulation Sheet
S-2
MEMORANDUM
To: Stu Fonda, Utilities Director ~
From: John Bock, Utilities Manager of Administratio~
Date: February 12 , 2014
Subject: Flood Cuts
When sewage backs up into a finished basement, the liquid penetrates into and behind the
drywall. The City has contracted with Belfor International to remove as much drywall
that has soaked up the liquid plus a few inches (flood cut) to facilitate drying , disinfection
and the application of fungicide.
Given the recent discussion and decision by the Water and Sewer Board regarding the
flood cut at 590 Pennwood Circle, would the Board want to add the restoration of flood
cuts to the list of services Belfor Internat ional is authorized to perform? We could have
them only replace and tape the dry wall.
I
MEMORANDUM
TO: Stu Fonda, Director
FROM: Vasser Abouaish, Engineer
DATE: February 28, 2014
SUBJECT: 804 East Stanford Avenue
Mr. Lance Cain has requested Englewood Utilities to provide water service to the above-
referenced address, which is in Denver Water service area, and provided a letter (attached)
indicating their inability to provide service to his property.
I contacted Denver Water engineering staff and discussed the matter with them and asked for a
detailed map (attached) showing their water mains in that area in the closest proximity to the
property, which they provided.
Englewood water provides service to the adjacent properties (to the south, east and north). The
staff is finalizing an estimated cost to provide water service that includes: a) an 8 inch stub from
the existing 24 inch water main along Clarkson Avenue, and b) two (2) % inch taps to
accommodate possibilities of future development plans.
I also attached a map showing Englewood wate r mains in the area and existing connections I
service lines.
7-/
DENVER ~VATER
February 13, 2014
Lance Cain
P.O . Box 40345
Denver, CO 80204
R.E. 804 E Stanford Ave .
To Whom It May Concern :
Denver Water is unable to provide domestic water service to 804 E Stanford Ave. The proximity of your
property lacks the required frontage to a water main in the Denver Water service area .
Should you have any questions feel free to call.
Regards ,
Respectfully ,
-0 L.//d
Tony Cocozzella
Engineering Special ist
Denver Water
Phone:303-628-6627
STANFO
450 1 ~
4509 6." 802
6.\!I
4521 BOO 91
1518
4527
4535 5'8
804 454 1
4547 5'8
~'8
4555
1.4'8
4565
4575 825 885
4585 111'5
4595 H ~
TUFTS
4601
7-3
7 -t.;
. ..;.:...-..,...,--...
Existing Water
•
•
•
Water Valves
Hydrants
Water Fittings
--Water Mains
Water Service Lines ,
!~!'.·.
N
A
1 inch = 100 feet
"The accuracy of the data within th is map is not to be taken/used as data produced by a Registered Professional Land Surveyor for the State of Colorado .
Th is product is for Informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be su itab le for legal , engineering , or survey ing purposes.
It does not represent an on the ground survey and represents only the approx imate relative locat ion of property boundaries ."
City of Englewood
Utilities Department
Current as of March 2013
2012 Imagery
lr)
I
t'
Date
April 21 , 2014
INITIATED BY
Utilities Department
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Agenda Item Subject
S. Platte Water Related
Activities Program -
Endangered Species Act
STAFF SOURCE
Stewart H. Fonda , Director of Utilities
COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION
Council approved Englewood 's participation in the S. Platte River Program on at their March 5 ,
2007 meeting .
RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Englewood Water and Sewer Board recommended at their March 11 , 2014 meeting ,
Council approval of Englewood 's continued participation in the S . Platte Water Related
Activities Program for 2014 and the six yea rs thereafter.
BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED
The South Platte Water Related Activities Program (SPWRAP) is an agreement with the
Department of the Interior to improve the habitat of the following endangered species -the
interior least tern , whooping crane , pallid sturgeon and the threatened piping plover. The
South Platte Water Related Activities Program (SPWRAP) would improve the habitat, by
providing more water in the critical area along the Platte River in Nebraska. Englewood , along
with other water users along the Platte River , are the principals in the SPWRAP agreement.
This agreement provides compliance with the Endangered Species Act to participating entities .
The Department of the Interior is funding half of the program , and through the Corps of
Engineers , issues 404 Permits for users along the Platte River. These permits are mandatory
for construction , repairs or projects in or along the Platte River.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Englewood 's portion of the assessment for the program for 2014 is $10 ,458.00 with an annual
assessment for an additional 6 years. Future assessment amounts will be computed on
treated water use and number of participan ts with the SPWRAP Program.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
The South Platte Water Related Activities Program
8-/
Stu Fonda
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Yasser Aboua ish
Wednesday , February 26 , 2014 2 :12 PM
Stu Fonda ; John Bock ; Cathy Burrage
Dennis Stowe
SPWRAP
The South Platte Water Related Activities Program (SPWRAP) Assessment has been calculated for the five (5) year
period (2009-2013) report and payment. However, the following issues remain:
• Discrepancy between what the WSB authorized (participation) and what the Council approved (payment)
• Additions and subtractions (water "owned " by others)
• Accounting for non-river water (GW , etc .)
• Status of payment for other years
• Wastewater re-use!
8 -Z
1
. '
Page 1 of 2
South Platte Water Related Activities Program, Inc.
A. Instructions:
Municipal (Class M) Membership
2014 Reporting Form & Assessment Invoice
Please fill in this form includ i ng membership informat ion , water use data , and the assessment as calculated .
Send payment for your SPWRAP annual assessment to the address listed at the bottom of th is form .
Municipal Member Entity
Mailing Address
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
1000 ENGLEWOOD PARKWAY
ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110
email Address
Phone Number
Submitted By
sfonda@englewoodgov.org
303-762-2636
Stewart H. Fonda 2-25-14
Date
Title Director of Utilities
B. Treated Water Use (Previous 5-Year Average, if available)
Note: A member's water use for purposes of defining the number of single-family equ ivalent taps
for SPWRAP is defined as "any treated water deliveries from sources of water owned by the
member."
(A) (B) (C) (0) =A+ B -C
Treated Water
Production at Total Treated
Member's Plant (s) 1 Addit ions 2 Subt ractions 3 Water Use
Year (acre feet ) (acre feet ) (acre feet) (acre feet )
2009 c; FiR'i 5,683
2010 6,263 6,263
2011 5 '718 5 '718
2012 5. 770 5 '770
2013 5.616 5,616
Average Adjusted Treated Water Use 4 5,810
1The total amount of treated water produced at your entity's water treatment faci lity
2Add any treated water that is owned by your entity but treated by another entity.
3 Subtract any water treated at your fac ility but not owned by your entity .
4 Equals the sum divided by the number of years reported.
20 14 SPW RA P Reporting Form Class M 12-26-13 .xl sForm 12/26/20 13
Page 2 of 2
C. Calculation of Single Family Equivalents, Membership Units and Annual Assessment
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Previous 5-Year Average (2009-2013) Treated Water Use (AF)
5 Use per S.F. Account (A F/SFE )
Single Family Equivalents (No. 1 divided by No . 2)
SPWRAP Member Units per SFE 5
Total SPWRAP Member Un its (No . 3 multiplied by No . 4)
2014 SPWRAP Assessment (per member uni t)5
Calculated Assessment (No. 5 multiplied by No. 6)
5 Numbers 2 , 4 & 6 above are fixed for all members in 2014
Minimum Assessment:7
2014 SPWRAP Assessment (enter larger of line 7 or 8 above)
If you are paying your assessment fo r all remaining years of the
PRRIP "First Increment" as described in Note 7 , check here
5,810
0.50
11, 620
6.0
69 '720
$ 0 .1 5
I 102458.00 I
$50.00
10,458.00
D. Payment of Assessment (Due by March 3rd in 2014)
*Notes:
Payment of the annua l assessment will provide membership in SPWRAP and coverage
under the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program through calendar year 2014 .
Please make check payable to "SPWRAP" and send to the following address :6
SPWRAP
% Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District
220 Water Avenue
Berthoud, Colorado, 80513
6 1f your entity requires a separate invoice please mail completed form to the above address .
Please indicate that an invoice is requested .
7 SPWRAP has established a minimum annua l assessment of $50 . Also , a member
whose annual assessment is $200 or less has t he option of making a one-time assessment
payment that is thirteen times (the length of the Program first increment) their calculated
annual assessment. If a member's calculated annual assessment is $2, thirteen times that
amount would be $26 . However, since the minimum assessment is $50 , the member pays
$50 one time and is covered for the first increment of the Program. If a member's
calculated annual assessment is $6, the member can either pay $50 each year, or make a
one-time assessment payment of $78 ($6 x 13). Members should consider the possible
benefits of making a one-time payment.
This reporting form may be revised in the future to reflect information needed to comply with Program requirements .
En tities electing to join after 2007 will be required to pay the assessment for the year they join the program.
In addition the new member must pay assessments for all prior years of the program, plus 4% interest, compounded annually.
2014 SPWRAP Reporting Form Class M 12-26-13 .xl sForm 12126/2013
South Platte Water Related Activ ities Program, Inc.
220 Water Avenue, Berthoud, Colorado, 80513
January 13, 2014
RE: SPWRAP Municipal Source Water Usage Questionnaire
Dear SPWRAP Municipal Member;
Cr cdi~
SPWRAP
As a signatory to the Platte River Recovery & Implementation Program (PRRIP) the State of
Colorado is required to provide source water use data every 5 years detailing the usage of water
in the South Platte River drainage in Colorado. This information is used to ve1ify and update the
assumed processes and data that were initially used during PRRIP negotiations. SPWRAP is
contractually obligated to collect and provide some of this data to the St ate. We need your
assistance with completing the attached questionnaire to meet these contractual obligations.
In order to collate and report the data to the State by the due date, we respectfully request you
return the questionnaire with a copy of you r 2014 Reporting Forni & Assessment Invoice,
including payment, which is due by March 3, 2014. If you have questions regarding the
completion of the questionnaire, please contact Jon Altenhofen at NCWCD as indicated at the
top of the questionnaire.
Thank you in advance fi r your assistance.
B -s-
South Platte Water Related Activities Program. Inc. (SPWRAP)
2014 Questionnaire on Sources of Water Supply -Required for Colorado 3-States PRRIP reporting.
Have questions? Contact Jon Altenhofen at jaltenhofen@ncwcd.org or call 970-622-2236.
Please return bv March 3. 2014 with 2014 Reporting Form & Assessment Invoice and Pavment
Reporting Entity: CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
Mailing Address: 1000 Enqlewood Pkwy.
FnolPwonri co An11n
Email Address: sfonda@englewoodg oij.org
Phone Number:
Submitted By: Stewart H. Fbnda
Title: Director of Utilities
Please fill in following blanks:
Years are calendar years (January-December)
Population Served with Treated Water
2009-2013 Average
31,000
County: Arapahoe
Date:
For the Treated Water Use on vour 2014 Reporting Form list the following% sources (should add to
100%):
2009-2013 Average
% Transbasin Imports
% Native South Platte Flow Development
(Surface Water and Tributary Groundwater)
% Nontributary Groundwater
%
100 %
%
% In Basin A12:ricultural Conversion:
(All acquired agriculture water rights)
%
Total lQQ__ %
Water Conservation Question: Reduction in water use due to residential conservation will be computed from
total gpcd for residential deliveries (gallons per capita per dav) as compared to prior reporting/studies:
5 year Average
2009-2013
90 gpcd (residential base line)
Wastewater -Reuse/Exchange Question: % reuse of all sources actually reused after wastewater treatment
(Directly after treatment--by pipeline or flow downriver for rediversion and indirectly by exchange/augmentation;
Total of all reuse):
5 year Average
2009-2013
% ----8 -{p
.
'
8-7
•'. •'.
· ·· >c Platte River Basin • . .
..
:.·· ·.Wyoming Nebraska ··.·:··
I
·1
~ . ·;_._·: .•..
::· .. ·.· .
. · .. '···/.·No rthgate
Lake M cC onaughy
L -' Lexington Ct>
: . .' .. ,:·
.....
.. ·-: .-··:,_
· ...
.. :·:: .. Critical Habitat
. : . >:~: --·.::.::·: .. .. . . ·. ·: ~ .. :~·>
Norto :Scale · , '.· · .---------·
.I
.I Kansas
Colorado · I . -~.: ~·
I
The South Platte Water Related
Activities Program
Since the late 1970's, conflicts be tween water use and endangered species
protection have affected federal permitting of existing and planned irrigation ,
munic ipal and industrial water supply projects in the Platte River basin. These are
404 permits issued by the Army Corps of Engineers whenever wo rk is done in the
South Plat te River or any of its tributaries.
In 1997 , the Governors of the States of Colorado, Nebraska and Wyoming signed an
agreement with the Department of the Interior to improve and/or study the habitat of
four endangered species in the central Platte River in Nebraska (endangered interior
least tern , whooping crane and pallid sturgeon and the threatened piping plover
(target species)). Some Colorado water users have incorporated into the South
Platte Water Related Activities Program , Inc . (SPWRAP), a Colorado nonprofit
corporation, to represent users and partner with the State to ensure compliance with
Program ob ligations. SPWRAP will serve as the vehi cle by which Colorado South
Platte water users participate in the Program, and the exclusive means by which
they will obtain the regulatory benefits of the Program. The Program was finalized in
October, 2006. This program will allow water projects to be initiated with relatively
little effort required for Endangered Species Act (ESA) compliance.
The program is a basin-wide effort undertaken by the 3 States and the Department
of the interior to provide benefits for the endangered interior lesser tern, whooping
crane, and pallid sturgeon and the threatened piping plover (the target species). The
habitat for these species is in Nebraska near Grand Island. Through the program
the states and the federal government will provide land, water and systema tic
monitoring and research.
The program is designed to be incremental, with the first increment lasting at least
13 years. During this time the objectives are to:
1. retime and improve flows in the central Platte River by an average of
130,000 to 150,000 acre-feet per year at Grand Island;
2. protect, restore and maintain 10 ,000 acres of habitat;
3. Implement the integrated monitoring and research plan through the
Adaptive Management Plan .
'I
The monetary cost of the first increment of the program is $187 million (2005). The
States plan to contribute water and land in addition to the monetary contributions.
The total burden of money, land and water will be shared equally by the 3 States
(50%) and the United States (50%). Basically, Colorado would provide money,
Wyoming would provide water and Nebraska would provide land with the United
States providing matching contributions.
This program is voluntary to water users along the South Platte River. The downside
is that if a federal 404 permit (for any activities in the river or its tributaries) is needed
by a water user, that user will be charged past dues to the program or the permit will
not be issued. The good news is that by participating in the program, the entity is
assured compliance with the Endangered Species Act. Otherwise compliance in the
future may cost much more than the program costs. The Program provides
substantial benefits to water users in the form of regulatory predictability under the
ESA.
The water users' portion is determined by the amount of water used in the past five
years. Englewood's contribution will be approximately $29,000 for this year. Since
the ESA went into effect, it was common knowledge that those diverting water
(especially in the Platte River basin) would be affected in some way. There were
many options discussed as to how water users would comply and some were very
detrimental to the diversion of water. The Program will allow compliance without
curtailing diversions by Englewood.
• Assessments will change each year depending on the amount of water
produced for the previous 5 years.
• The Program would like assessments for the first year paid by April 1, 2007.
• Assessments may change depending on how many entities join.
8 -/0