Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-09-17 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet- • • I • •' • • Englewood City Council September 17, 2001 ' Ordinance#~~ 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64 Resolution II,, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 • .. .. 0 • 0 0 I • 0 • • -• I. Call to Order -· • ... ·~ • - ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL ENGLEWOOD, ARAPAHOE COUNTY. COLORADO Regular Session September 17, 2001 ,. The regular meeting of the Englewood City Council was ca lled to order by Ma yo r Bums at 7 :38 p .m . 2 . Invocation The invocation was given by Council Member Nabholz . 3. Pledge of Allegiance The Pledge of Allegiance was led b y Mayo r Burns. 4 . Roll Call Present : Absent: A quorum was present. Also present: 5. Minutes Council Members Na bholz. G raz uli s, Garrett. Bradshaw , Yurchick, Bums Council Member Wolosyn City Manager Sears City Attorney Brotzman Assistant City Manager Flaherty City Clerk Ellis Director Olson. Safety Services Municipal Judge Atencio Director Gryglew1c2. Finance and Administrative Services Director Fonda . tilities (a) COUNCIL MEMBER GRAZULIS MOVED. AND IT WAS SECONDED. TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2001. Ayes : Nays : Absent : Motion earned . 6 . Scheduled Visitors There were no scheduled visitors . 7 . Unscheduled Visitors Counc il Members Nabho lz. Garre tt , Bradshaw , Yurchi ck , Grazulis, Burns None Coun ci l Member Wolosyn • • I • 0 - • • -• Englewood City Council September 17, 2001 Page 2 ) . .. • • -' (a) Steven Hoelter, 4460 South Elati Street, said he would like to address the cat ordinance iss ue . He noted that Mr. Garrett is hi s Counci l representati ve and so he is probabl y familiar wi th the issue . I ha ve had a hard time with the cat issue over the past two years . Mr . Hoe lt er said . and I can 't seem to ge t any results , or lukewarm re sults at best. Last yea r I rented cat traps twice, got a cou ple , and went the neighborly route and talked to the neighbors . We ha ve been to the poi nt where John Edgmon, a Code Enforcement Officer. has been up to talk to the people in violation. once already. People keep doing it. I ca lled back down to the ordinance depanment about it and the best they ca n tell me to do is to come down, get a cat trap , trap the cat , give up my time and take it down to the Humane Society. He pointed out that . in other words. it is all falling back onto me . I am the one s uffering here . It is not just o ne ca t. there are five or six ca ts, a whole bunch of them, and the neighbors just will not take ca re of 11. Now we are to th e point that . not onl are the y thumbing their nose at me , but th ey are a lso thumbing th eir nose at the o rdinance and the officers . I have been asked what s hould be done , he said . and I don 't care what yo u do. If you want to go over th ere and talk to them and leave them love notes , I don't ca re . If yo u \\ant to Cite the guy, then I am all for It , whatever it take s. And then I get thi s s piel from the ord man ce people. that th e judges don 't like cat and dog issues coming across their desk unless we ha ve so me backup. like t\\O or three witnesses . I asked John Edgmon if we could go forward with thi s and then when it come tune he could testify a little bit . Mr. Edgmon told me that the y can't testify on th e ir own again st th e cases . I don 't understand that , he said. If I get a ticket on the street and I want to protest the ticket 111 coun. the offi cer doesn't have to have two or three outside witnesses to te stify. So why. he asked . do I ha,e to fight tooth and nail to get something done. such as getting the cat ordinance taken care of. It I rnnsta nll } bemg pu hed back onto me . the person that is having the trouble . to deal with the problem. I lme ammal s I feel hke I shouldn 't have to ca tch the cat in the trap. just because the owner does n 't "ant to ta~c re s pons 1b1lil ). Now. he emphasized. it is not the cat's problem and it is not my problem. ll1e 1h111g I am goin g 10 court O\'er. ,f I am g1\'e11 a c itati on, he sa id , is , to me , like a s peeding ticket between the C 11 y of En g le \\oOd and the person in ,•1olatio n. Going to court on it is not going to be between my nei ghbor and me. 1t 1s between Englewood and my neighbor . So I am looking for some relief here . I kno" ome of you ha,·e talked about thi s issue and stuff. panicularly my issue . So. he said, I am coming down here to JUSI ask you gu ys to either amend this ordinance to give it more meat or we need to talk to our Judges and ha\'e them cntertam these ideas when they come across their desk and maybe c ut the coun time down on It to ma ybe expccl11e 11 so 1t doesn 't get dragged out for months at a time or we need to gel the ode Enforcemc111 people to do the job a little better. I am not tr ying to knock them, he sai d , but ma ybe th ey need to be a little more forceful with the people that conti nue to abuse the problem. Mr. Hoe lter sa id hi s other iss ue ha s to do with th e weed problem. He said. I don 't kn o w \\hat your procedure 1s , but It 1s almost like there 1s no patrolling goi ng on. because up and down th e alle ys , behmd A & A and Liquor Barn, the weeds are four feet tall and the tra sh ord mance says you ca nn o t put your tra s h o ut into the right -of-way of th e alley, except on tra s h day and then you ha ve to pick your barrels up and move them in . That is never e nforced. Pe op le constantly ha ve their fence right up to the alle y and th en they put their trash in a pla stic bag and the ordinance says it must be in a covered container or in a container that can't be torn up and scattered by the animals. That is not enforced either. Regarding th e weed issue, he asked if anyone on Council ha s gone over and looked at the old Ci ty Hall. The weeds are very high around it , he said, and it seems like we should go over and at least take care of our own backyard . Mr. Hoelter said he appreciated the opponunity to speak and noted that he is a little ho t on the issue . I hope this is the last time I have to be down here on the cats, he said, because if I do it is going to be a little hotter. He thanked Council for their time . Mayor Burns opined that Mr. Hoelter had some perfectly legitimate que stions . I have heard th e comment before that the officer can't testify, he said . Ci ty Attorney Brotzman said that that is on barking dog issues. that is not on number of cats. He ex plained that the barking dog ordinance reads that it has to offend the neighborhood and the Code Enforcement officers are not pan of the neighborhood . I • 0 - • • Englewood City Council Seplember 17, 2001 Page 3 ,· .. ,. • • - Director Olson said he just wanted to add some mput on this . Code Enforce ment ha s been trying to work with thi s gentleman on the ca t is sue . he said . and we believe Mr. Hoelter understands that there is a process in pla ce and yes he does have to file a complamt and we ca n act on a complamt and yes it will go before Muni cipal Court, that is how it works . These kmd of violations are not what yo u consider to be like penalty assessments , where the y just send in S 15 .00 and the issue is sen led. Director Ol so n stated that we have tried to work with him on this . I have a complamt in front on me , he said . that was filed by hi s neighbor who essentially indicated that thi s gentleman came ove r and threatened to take all of his ca ts and he would never see them again . We obviously try to encourage neighborhood coope ration on the se iss ues, but there arc procedures that we follow and we are tryi ng to work with him on thi s and that 1s still our goal. l"m not saying that right now we ha ve the perfect ordinances in place . he said , but I am looki ng at those. as yo u know and yo u should be hearing more from the Code Enforce ment Advisory Comm inee . All I am asking thi s gent leman to do is work with Code Enforce ment and we wi ll try to get it rc so lwd . If a complam t is filed we will work with the nei ghbor. Mr. Olson stated that the neighbor does adnut th at the ca ts get out. Right now. he said, the fact is that we don·1 have the peo pl e. nor is it appropnate for u to be out there in the middle of the night trapping cats and that is when yo u ge t cats. Mr. Hoelte r made several comments from the audience that were inaudible . He said thi s 1s so wrong , yo u just keep puning it back on the ci tizens . Director Olson told Mr. Hoelter that he wa s j ust trymg to explain the process . Mr. Hoelter continued to comment from the audience (inaudibl y). Ma yor Burns asked :\fr. Hoelter to let Mr. Ol son speak . Director Olson no ted the y are tr ying to work with Mr . Hoe lter. The sit uation 1s . as 111 for everybody e lse. that we allow them to ha ve traps , which are owned by the C it y, to trap th e cats. He sa id he un derstood Mr. Hoelter trapped a cat thi s weekend . He asked what happened to the cat. Mr. Hoelter said he took 11 down to the Humane Society. Then, Director Olson pomted out. the system works . They have th e cat and that is the best way to deal with it. We don "t want to ha ve people taking ca ts and dropping them off o ut in the woods somewhere, way out in another part of the metro area. So taking them to the Humane Society. which is just ten minutes away. is how we will get it re so lved and it is up to the 0"11er to get that cat back . But right now, he said, we are not go mg to get into the situation where we are trapping cats . It 1s a totally different prospect, as you can imagine . and this one has, essentially, worked fairly well throughout the Ci ty for many yea rs. So. Direc tor Olson said. we wi ll continue to work with thi s gentleman and he ha s got to work with us . It is kind of a two way street and we will do what we can to re so lve hi s iss ue. a nd . I can understand , it is an issue . Director Olson said , regarding the weeds and everything. that, as you know. we do consta nt patrol s and it is a matter of constantly turning out weed vio lations. as Coun c il can see in the statistic s, which th ey ha ve . That is where we are at right now . He noted tha t he did not want to get into that man y other issues re garding thi s individual. He advised Mr. Hoelter that we are trying to work him. Council Member Bradshaw advised that her conce rn is that peo ple he si tate to ca ll and turn people in because their names are given to the neighbor. That is why, she said, when I get a complaint from someone. I say I have thi s complaint and I don ·1 even say th e neighbors name . Because, inevitabl y. it get s back to them. That is a problem too . lfwe want Code Enforceme nt , then we ne ed Code Enforceme nt to go out . take a look. \\Ti te the cita ti on and get out of neighborhood polit ics. That 1s my opinion, she said. Mayor Bums asked 1fthey have tried mediation services . We have talked about thi s in the past . he said . that there are mediation se rvices offered . as sometimes yo u have neighbors who go on for years ha v ing problems with eac h other. It ma y be ca ts , it may be weeds or it may be something else . I have attended sessions on thi s. he said . and sometimes the y find out that some of the issues between the neighbors are not the issue s that are on the surfa ce . It 1s the ones underneath, that happened ten years ago, that are causin g the problem and some of these mediation services can reall y be a help . I don't think we have incorporated that into our code enforcement before, but the y have done some remarkable work at the Universit y of .. I • 0 - • • • Englewood City Council September 17, 2001 Page4 • • -' Denver on this and I would sti ll like to look into this . He noted he has brought thi s up before. 1 have heard them describe this and 1 know someone who used to work very actively in that area who is the daughter of a District Court Judge . She explained, to a Bar Association Meeting 1 attended one time. some remarkable things they find out when they do mediation . They get underneath the surface problem and reall y have some remarkable insights sometimes. 1 still think that is a valuable service in the right kind of case and we should still look into that , he opined. Council Member Garren said he just wanted to finish up with the process issue. This gentleman traps a neighbor's cat and takes it over to the Humane Society. He asked if. when the neighbor picks the cat up. if he is cited for a cat that is not on the property. Director Olso n said it is his understanding that the y probably are cited at that point, if they come back and claim the cat. Council Member Garrett said, al so , that he thinks there has been a mi s understanding, as C ode Enforcement Officers can testify if 1t goes before the judge. Director Olson said it is his understanding that Code Officers cannot. on their own. write one of these cttations and then show up in court and be the complatnant and the wttness and the officer that turned in the violation. That is my understandmg at thi s pomt. he said. So we would like to have a neighbor complain. which thi s gentleman can do , and then we can go ahead and file a complaint and go through the process. Council Member Garrett said that in this particular case it is sort of obvious that you have a problem. as the cat is at the Humane Society and was trapped on the properry. Director Olson aid yes and no . We have the gentleman's word on this. the officer was not there to observe thi s . it is Just the gentleman·s word that 11 happened. The assumption is that ifhe had traps on his property that that is probably the case. He pointed out that that will be the issue in court and the court will have to decide. Ctty Attorney Brotzman noted that we have a linle bit of a di sconnect on barking dogs versus dogs at large or. m thi s case, ca ts at large and the compla ining witness. We will II down with Code Enforcement and go through that again . Counci l Member Bradshaw said good. C ity Attorney Brotzman advised that we do use mediation through the University of Denver and it does require both neighbors to participate, which is sometimes the difficult part. Getting both neighbors to the table . But we do use DU for that process. he said. Council Member Yurchick asked why doesn't animal control pick up these trap , when people catch a cat. and transport it to the Humane Society. rather than the citizens having to do it. Dire ctor Olson sa id. quite honestly. we don 't have the time to go around and get all the cats that are trapped out there . It JUSt makes 11 a much ea s ier, quic ker process. as opposed to when the cat s are caught at night or whenever, for us to try to pick them up the next da y. If 1t 1s a reall y tough s 1tuat1on we wi ll try to help them o ut , he said . but \\C ha ve found that with the number of cats and the number of iss ue s relating to thi s. and Just the difficulty of trapping cats to begin wtth , that 11 \\Ork s much better for the citizens to trap the cat and take the cat to the Humane Society. But. he reiterated, in extreme situations we will help them out and do the be t we can . Council Member Yurchick asked if there are a lot of people trapping cats in Englewood . Director Olson advised that there are a lot of complaints and it depends on how serious they are about the cat bemg in their yard. Generally, he noted. you are going to get cats in the middle of the night, that is when the y are going to be out and about. not during the day. Mayor Bums asked Director Olson if they have been able to check how many cats a homeowner actually has , whether they are in compliance with the ordinance regarding the number of animals. Director O lson said they try to, but with cats it is pretty difficult to do. dogs are not so hard. It is that s ame issue of how far do you go to determine what people actually have. Dogs are easy, but cats are pretty difficult at times . Mayor Bums said yes. they could be hiding anywhere . • I • 0 • • • Englewood City Council September 17 , 2001 Page 5 • • • Mayor Bums commented that he thought we could clear up a few issues here . Mr. Hoelter, speaking from the audience . requested a couple of minutes for a rebunal. He stated that he ha s bent over backwards to work with these guys . The City code officer even talked on the phone with the gentleman that is in violation, he said . and the violation sti ll goes on . What other avenue do we go to after the y have talked to the people , he asked . I ha ve been nice and go ne ove r there and dealt with this for two years and this gentleman over here is saying that we are trying to meet you in the middle of the road . I think I have gone beyond that and that is not fair of him. Mayor Bums anempted to explain the situation and Mr. Hoelter interrupted , from the audience, to say that the idea here is I get five minutes and you guys get twenty minutes and once again yo u make the c iti ze n look bad. Mayor Bums noted that is not the way we look at it and Mr. Hoe lter continued speaking (inaudib ly) from the audience. Mr. Hoelter, as he left the meeting . made an inaudible comme nt . ending with .. ,hi s is not the la st yo u ha ve heard from me ." Mayor Bums thanked him for comi ng. Mr. Hoe lter continued commenting (i naudibl y) as he wa lk ed out of the room. Director Olson said he wanted to throw something else out . now that he is gone . We just found a sign on his truck and we were trying to get a picture of it . but he re moved it before we could . Mr. Olson read , from a note, the inflanunatory message that was on the sign . So . he pomted o ut , we are very concerned about stability issues, more than an ything else. Mayor Bums thanked Director Olson for deahng with thi s. 8. Communitatlons, Prodamations and Appointments (a) A proclamation declaring September 19. 2001 as Ra ce Equality Day was considered . COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED, AND IT WAS SECONDED. TO DECLARE SEPTEMBER 19. 2001 AS RACE EQUALITY DAY. Ayes : Council Members Nab ho lz, Garrett, Bradshaw . Yurchick, Grazulis , Bums Nays: None Absent : Council Member Wolosyn Motion carried. (b) A proclamation declaring the week of September 16 through 22 , 2001 as Yellow Ribb on Youth Suicide Awareness and Prevention Week was considered . COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED, AND IT WAS SECONDED, TO APPROVE DECLARING THE WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 16 THROUGH 22, 2001 AS YELLOW RIBBON YOUTH SUICIDE AWARENESS AND PREVENTION WEEK. Ayes : ays : Absent : Motton carried . Council Members Nabholz, Garrett , Bradshaw , Yurchtck . Grazulis, Bums None Council Member Wolosyn • I • 0 - • • Englewood City Council September 17, 2001 Page6 1••,.,.. •"' l .. • .. • • ' (c) A resolution appointing Marcia O 'Brien as Associate Municipal Judge was considered. COUNCIL MEMBER GRAZULIS MOVED, AND IT WAS SECONDED , TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO . 68 , SERIES OF 2001 -APPOINTING MARCIA O'BRIEN AS ASSOCIATE MUNICIPAL JUDGE. RESOLUTION NO. 68, SERIES OF 2001 A RESOLUTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF MARCIA G . O 'BRIE N AS AN AS SO C IAT E MUNICIPAL JUDGE FOR THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . Vote results: Ayes : Nays : Absent : Motion carried . Council Members Nabholz, Garren. Bradsha w. Yurc h ic k. Grazulis , Bums None Council Member Wolosyn Municipal Judge Atencio noted that Ms . O 'Brien is a member of the Board o f Adju stment and Appea ls. Marcia O 'Brien was sworn in by Englewood Municipal Judge Vin cent Atenc io . (d) A proclamation in honor of the li ves lost and the heroic efforts displayed during the National Tragedy on September 11 , 2001 was considered . Mayor Burns advised that he has asked the City Clerk to read this proclamation regarding the anack on America and then Council will vote on it formall y. The City Clerk read the proclamation in its entirety . MA \'OR BURNS MOVED, AND IT WAS SECONDED, TO APPROVE THE PROCLAi\1A TION IN HONOR OF THE LIVES LOST AND THE HEROIC EFFORTS DISPLA \'ED DURING THE NATIONAL TRAGEDY ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001. Ayes : Council Members Nabholz, Garren, Bradshaw. Yurchick, Grazulis, Bums Nays : None Absent : Council Member Wo losyn Motion carried . Mayor Bums presented the proclamation to Director Olson . Director Olson said he would have to sa y that this is an issue, obviously, that transcends a cat issue . And when you think back it hasn 't even been a week since this all occurred, it is quite amazing, shocking and quite frightening to think of how this situation has impacted our country . I appreciate the proclamation, he said, and I gladly accept it on behalf of the fire and police personnel of this C ity. I also accept it on behalf of the citizens a s well , because we are all tragically affected by this entire situation. This is very nice, he said, and I enjoyed the ceremony tonight, it was wonderful. He noted it brings us back to reality and tells us that there are so many issues that transcend the minor issues we deal with on a day-to-day basi s. We appreciate this, he said, and he thanked Mayor Bums and Council. 9 . Public Hearing I • 0 2 I - • • ,-. Englewood City Council Seplember 17, 2001 P11ge 7 • • - (a) Mayor Bums advised that this a public hearing to gather citizen input on the City of Englewood 's proposed 2002 Budget and copies of the budget are available in the Library, the Finance Depanment and the Cit y Manager ·s Office. COUNCIL MEMBER GARRETT MOVED. AND IT WAS SECONDED, TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING TO GATHER INPUT ON THE 2002 PROPOSED BUDGET. Ayes : Council Members Nabhol z, Garrett, Bradshaw. Yurchick, Grazuli s, Burns Nays : No ne Absent : Council Member Wolosyn Motion carried and the Public Hearing opened . Director Gryglewicz, being duly sworn , submitted to the City C lerk. Proof of Publication that notice of thi s public hearing was published on August 31 , 2001 , September 7, 2001 and Se ptember 14 . 2001 in the Englewood Herald. He noted that this is a public hearing to gather public input on the 2002 Budget. I a m here to answer questions, he said, and, as Mayor Bums pointed out, the pro posed budget 1s a\'ailable at C it y Hall . Mayor Bums asked if Director Gryglewicz would sununarize, ge nerall y. how thi s budge t rela tes to. say. last years budget . He noted we have had some discussion of this in Stud y Sess io n. that the budge t 1s ti ghte r than it was a year ago . Mayor Bums pointed out that we have a lot of projects for th e C it y that we are trying to fund and we are trying to maintain an adequate fund balance at the same tim e . Director Gryglewicz said that is true , this has been a fairly difficult budget. because what we have se en 1s that both the national and local economy have staned to slow somewhat and the C it y 1s highl y dependent on sales and use tax and they general follow economic activity. So as that has slo\\ ed . so ha s th e collection. But unfortunately, he said, expenditures have not. They have continued to rise fairl y rapidl y. especially in the areas of personnel costs. He pointed out that health and dental in suran ce hav e increased every year. double digits . and it has been extremely diffi cult to keep up with th ose . So. he noted. thi s 1s a fairly tough budget . The Ci ty. ove r the past decade , has done ve ry well . We hav e co ll ec ted an in creas mg amount of revenues , we ha ve been able to provide good benefits , maintain our people and our services and we ha ve al so been able to help build th is Civic Ce nter . We've contributed to the C it yCe nt er Englewood sit e, Centennial Park , a number ofpropeny purc ha ses. infrastructure improvement s and constru c ti on . And thi s ye ar, he said . o n the capital side , we are scaling back . We are doing just what we reall y need to do . It used to be that we did our ur ge nt and ne cessa ry proj ec ts, now we are doing just those and not some of th ose below the line . We are . probabl y, goi ng to put tho se out a little bit, look at some more creati ve finan ci ng options and delay or just kill some of the proj ec ts for a while , until the economics turn around . Director Gryglewicz noted that one of the olher issues is this site. When we put the 2001 Budget together, he said , we thought we would have more tenants he re and would be staning to collect some revenue s. We are staning to see some of that turn around , but we probably won 't see it until next year. Ho pefull y, those wi ll come in and we will be able to make more of our ca pital investments . But, he said, I think it is pretty mu c h a status quo budget. There are a few increases in personnel. One in Safety Services and Public Work s and there are a couple of other small pan-time positions, but for the mo st pan it is status quo . It is a tight budget , he said. but it is a pretty good budget . Eve ryo ne worked very hard on it . Director Gryglewicz commented that this downturn happened extremely rapidly. I think everyone has seen that, although our revenues are still tracking fairly much on-line with what we budgeted . That is because, in pan, a couple o f the venues have opened and are contributing at Civic Center. It has brought us to rea lit y a little , he said, because we had such a large growth in our revenues in the 90's and I think we are back to a little bit tighter ship. Mayor Bums asked if Council had any questions . • I • 0 • • -• Englewood Cily Council September 17. 2001 Page8 • . . ' - Director Gryglewicz commented that , as he had mentioned at their last meeting at Study Session, our main goal is to maintain our people and our services to our ci tizens , first and foremost. Mayor Bums pointed out that, as usual, we have not , during this period of time , nor are we now recommending, any increase in sales tax rates or property tax rates. Director Gryglewicz stated we are not recommending any raises in any taxes. Mayor Bums asked if Council had any questions for Director Gryglewicz. There were none . Owen Beaver, 3148 South York Street, being duly sworn, noted that he is running for th e Mayor"s seat on Council. Mayor Bums said he was aware of that . Mr. Beaver said that the reason he wanted to speak tonight was because, as he has been walking the last month, he thinks he has kind of got the pul se of District 2 . As we know, he said, Englewood still holds a large senior citizen population and I know that a lot of those citizens are mostly ladies . They are concerned, he said. as the y remember Cinderella City and that went downhill and they look at the CityCenter and it is not completed yet and then the y read in th e Englewood Herald last week about the budget having to be cut. He pointed out that you mention a half a mil hon dollars to these people who went through the depression and it seems like a lot of money to th em. told them, he said. that th e budget is quite large. however we still have to be concerned about a half a million dollars. He noted there is the que stion of what to save and what to cut and are we saving mone y by cuning back on different departments. They wonder what, exactly, must be cut to make the budget work. and I thmk people are ve ry concerned . So. he said, I would say to the Counc il , that it is probabl y too lat e for the October newsletter, but for the No ,·ember or December issue yo u ma y want to let people know what is gomg on with the budget , because these people are concerned . Mr . Beaver stated that. right away , a lo t of people say they don't want to see people lose their jobs. They know that the economy is changing . He noted that they read that the airlines are cutting 12 ,000 jobs and one lady thought 6,000 were right here in Englewood . That is just how they view things. So. he said, I just thought , as Council looks into it , that they need to let the people know that we are doing well. Yes , the economy is struggling, but the Ci ty is strong and the basic services will be there . For example, maybe we are buying cloth chairs instead of leather chairs, or however you want lo put it . But a lot of people are concerned . especially the senior citizens . He corrunented that Englewood is a blue-collar town . I know a lot of people are working hard, he said, but the y are experiencing job cut backs . They want to know how the City 1s dealing with cutbac ks. That is all I wanted 10 say, that the City needs to get the word out to the public that we are not in the tank . that the tank is half full , or howeve r yo u want to put 11 , but we are doing well. I j ust talked to a lad y toda y. he said. and she was probably 80 years, but she is afraid that her City services won ·1 be there , because the y are being cul back . So those are the sort of things I wanted to talk about. he said . Mr. Beaver stated that he would be glad to answer any que stions Council might have , but otherwise he wanted to thank Council for their time . Mayor Bums thanked Mr . Beaver . Mayor Bums said he thought what Director Gryglewicz was saying is that we are not doing as man y capital improvements as we might, but we are not cutting back on City services . Director Gryg lewi cz said that is true . First and foremost we want 10 maintain our services to the public and also maintain our wo rkforce . That. he noted , is why we are not going 10 do as many ca pital proj ec ts . We are JUSI doing those that are funded in the Public Improvement Fund, as those are funded from separate sources of rev e nue s. He advised that a lot of those core capital projects and improvements, that we have identified as reall y necessary, will be done , but we are not looking at any service cutbacks in core services, so tho se should be maintained. Mayor Bums stated that we do report on the budget in the Citizen newslener, and it is a good suggestion . But. he opined, it is important for the press , and so forth , to understand this also, when they write stories about the budget. Citizens need to understand that we will not be cuning essential services for seniors . I I • 0 • • • Englewood Cily Council September 17, 2001 Page9 • • - .. understand why the y would be concerned, he said , and it is important to get the word out that we are not cunmg their services. Director Gryglew,cz said absolutely. we are not looking at cuning services for any of our citizens. One of the reasons we went back and kept going back and cuning out of thi s budget. was that we wanted to maintain a high fund balance to help us get through thi s economic 11me . Because. he noted. it will tum around, but we are just not sure when and we want 10 make s ure that we do have enough mone y m the bank 10 maintain our servi ces and our people. Mayor Bums thanked Director Gryglewicz. Mayor Bums asked if an yo ne e lse wanted to speak during this Public Hearing on the City of Englewood 's Proposed 2002 Budget. There was no one. COUNCIL MEMBER GARRETT MOVED, AND IT WAS SECONDED, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2002 PROPOSED BUDGET. Ayes : Council Members Nabholz. Garrett. Bradshaw. Yurchick . Grazulis. Bums Nays : None Absent: Council Member Wolosyn Motion carried and the Public Hearing closed. 10. Consent Agenda (a) Approval of Ordinances on First Reading There were no additional items submtned for approval on first reading. (See Agenda Item 11 • Regular Agenda.) COUNCIL MEMBER GARRETT MO\'ED, AND IT WAS SECONDED. TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 10 (b) (i) and (ii). AND 10 (c) (i). (b) Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading (1) ORDINA 1CE NO. 53, SERIES OF 2001 (COUNCIL BILL NO. 56. INTROD CED BY CO N IL MEMBER GARRETI) AN ORD1:"<A1'CE AUTHORIZING AN INTER GOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT ENTITLED "CO 1TRACT AGREEMENT FOR INTOXIL YZER 5000E PLA CEMENT" BETWEEN THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, LABORATORY AND RADIATIO SERVICES DIVISION AND THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. (ii) ORDINANCE NO. 54, SERIES OF 2001 (COUNCIL BILL NO . 57 . INTRODUCE D BY COU CIL MEMBER GARRETI) AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF BAKER A VENUE AND TEJON STREET IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO. ( c) Resolutions and Motions (i) AUTHORIZATION FOR THE LIBRARY TO APPLY TO THE STATE OF COLORADO FOR FUNDS UNDER THE ANNUAL STATE GRANTS TO LIBRARIES PROGRAM . .. I • 0 • Englewood City Council September 17, 2001 Pace to Vote resulls: Ayes : Nays : Absent : Motion carried. 11 . Regular Agenda • • - Council Members 'abholz, Garrett. Bradshaw. Yurch,ck. Grazuhs. Bums No ne Council Member Wolosyn (a) Approval of Ordinances on First Reading ... (i) Mayor Bums advised that thi s agenda item is a recommendation from th e Utilities Dcpanment to adopt a bill for an ordinance authori zing a City Ditch License Agreement with TCI Cab le vision of Georgia/ AT & T Broadband . Council Member Garren stated that his employer is AT&T Broadband. which is the parent ofTCI of Georgia, therefore he would be abstaining from the discussion and vo te on th, pan icular agenda ,tern . [Clerk's note: Council Member Garren left the dais .] Director Fonda advised that this is a routine crossing of the Ci ty Ditch and they will bore underneath th e pipe . It is down near Mineral Avenue, where that new shopping area is goi ng m. We recommend appro val of this item. he said . Mayor Bums asked if Counci l had any questions . There were none . COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED. AND IT WAS SECONDED. TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 11 (a) (i) -COUNCIL BILL NO. 59. COUNCIL BILL NO. 59, INTRODUCE D BY CO CIL MEMBER BRADSHAW A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE AUTHORJZING A "LI CENSE AGREEMENT" FOR CO DUIT FOR UNDERGROUND CABLE ACROSS THE CITY DITCH RIGHT-OF-WAY TO AT&T BROADBAND. Vote resulls: Ayes : Nays : Abstain : Absent : Motion carried. Council Members Nabholz, Bradshaw. Yurchick, Grazulis, Bums None Council Member Garrett Council Member Wolosyn [Clerk 's note : Council Member Garren returned to the dais .] (ii) Assistant City Manager Flaheny presented a recommendation from the Ci ty Manager's Office to adopt a bill for an ordinance approving the Third Amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement with the Regional Transponation District (RTD), reimbursing the City of Englewood for work performed by the City and the Englewood Environmental Foundation (EEF) on behalf of RTD. He advised that EEF has completed three projects . A splashguard that allows for planting along the retaining wall at the light rail and bus station, sixteen bicycle lockers that have been placed at the light rail station and three additional bus benches that have recently been placed at the bus terminal for the light rail station, are the three projects . These costs have been borne by EEF in the amount of$37,193.00 and they will be returned to EEF with the approval of this contract , he said . The founh item is work that is in • I I • 0 • • -• Englewood Cily Council September 17, 2001 Page II . ' • .. ••• • ' progress. Earlier this year, City officials met with RTD officials regarding extension of the s idewalk from the light rail station at Oxford to Mansfield Avenue and RTD indicated the y would fund that constntction project . The total cost to RTD is $26,000.00. It is now in process . he said . as pan of our annual capital projects and the City has provided for construction and design engineering. I-le asked 1fthere were any questions . Mayor Bums asked if that is all pan of the Third Amendment . Mr. Flaherty sa id yes . each of the se Item s will be included in the Third Amendment. COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED. AND IT WAS SECO:O.DED. TO APPRO\'[ AGENDA ITEM I I (a) (ii) -COUNCIL BILL NO. 60. COUNCIL BILL NO . 60, I TRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW A BILL FOR A ORDI 'ANCE AUTHORIZING A THIRD AMENDME~T TO A:--AGREE~ENT FOR E GLEWOOD CITYCE!I.TER BEnVEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD A~D RTD . Vote results: Ayes : ays : Absent : Motion carried. Council Members abholz, Garren. Bradsha", Yurc h,ck . Grazuhs, Bums one Council Member Wolosyn (b) Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading There were no additional items submined for approval on second reading. (See Agenda Item IO -Co nsent Agenda .) ( c) Resolutions and Motions (i) Director Fonda presented a recommendation from the Littleton/Englewood Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisory Committee to approve. by motion, Amendment I to the Professional Engineering Ser\'ices Contract with Brown & Caldwell in the amount ofSS,950.364 .00 for Phase 2 Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements. He advised that this is the engineering contract to actually design the facilities . They have completed the pre-engineering design. He noted that this contract is in the amount ofSS,950,364 .00 and it is anucipated that the proJect will be m the range of$80 10 $85 million. At this point it will probably take about a year and a half to two years 10 complete the design , at which time we will go forward with construction. The design ,s for increase of capacity from about 36 million gallons a day to 50 million gallons a day and, also, we will be adding an additional level of treatment , in that we will be designing facilities to remove nitrates . So, he said, I would recommend approval of the Brown & Ca ldwell contract at this time . Mayor Bums noted the Council Communication indicates that the two primary factors that have been identified, that will require expansion of the present facility , is the higher than anticipated population growth in the facility's service area and the regulatory requirement 10 remove nitrate . Director Fonda explained that since we designed the last facility, based on DRCOG projections. the population has grown at nearly double that rate . We are in somewhat of a time bind, he said, because we have just finished construction of the last facilities and now we are, very rapidly, going mto design of the next set of facilities . Although , he noted. we have worked out adequate compliance schedules with the State . • I • 0 • • -• • • • • - Englewood City Council September 17, 2001 Page 12 COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED, AND IT WAS SECONDED. TO APPRO\'E AMENDMENT I TO THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT WITH BROWN & CALDWELL IN THE AMOUNTOFSS.950.364.00 FOR PHASE 2 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS . Motion camed. Ayes: Nays : Absent : C ouncil Members Nabholz. Garren. Bradsha". Yu rc h1 ck. Grazulis. Burns None Council Member Wolosyn (ii) Director Fonda presented a recommendation from the Lmleton Engle"ood Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisory Committee to approve, by mo11 o n. Amendmenl 2 10 the Professional Engineering Services Contract with Brown & Caldwell m the amount of S5 I . 7 .00 for Disinfection Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements. This is pan of1he same proJecl . he said. bu1 we had to break out this work, which will be designed and bid separatel y. bccau e 1he Water Qualit y Control Division has placed a compliance requirement sc hedule on u thal we would 110 1 be able 10 meel 1f we lefl II as pan of the original contract. Director Fonda explained that thi s I bas 1 all y adding a ch lorine contac 1 basin to give us enough detention time. We can design thi s. he sa id . and then go mt o cons trncuon "11h a separate contract and ha ve it done. in o rde r 10 meet our 11me requirements . Mayor Bums asked if there were any questions about thi s pon1on of th e ontract There were none. COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED. AND IT WAS SECONDED. TO APPROVE AMENDMENT 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT WITH BROWN & CALDWELL IN THE AMOUNT OF S518,788.00 FOR DISINFECTION WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS . Ayes: 1 ays: Absent : Motion carried . Council Members Nabholz. Garrett . Bradshaw. Yurch1 c k. Grazulis. Burns None Council Member Wolosyn 12 . General Discussion (a) Mayor's Choice (i) Mayor Bums offered his congratulations to Sue Eaton for the C IRSA Loss Prevention Award and the Public Human Resource Ce rtificate from the Cenification Counci l of IPMA . He commented that it looks like the Human Re sources Depanment is doing an excellent job . (ii) Mayor Bums noted that City Manager Sears told Council about the T-REX groundbreaking next Monday morning at 10 :00 a .m. (iii) Mayor Bums said we have a DRCOG board meeting on Wednesday night and Cal Marsella will be there to talk about FasTracks. (iv) Mayor Bums advised that the Rail-Volution Conference was cancelled because of the events of last week. They are trying to reschedule, he said, and Director Simpson has told me he is not sure they will be able to, as it will be pretty tough to res c hedule a national conference like that. (v) Mayor Bums noted that the U rban Land Institute Conference, to be held in two weeks. that he was invited to, is still on. That may a bit difficult, especially with an international mayor's complication, as I don 't know how many of them will be able to get there or will choose to come . • I • 0 • • Englewood City Council September 17, 2001 Page 13 • • -' (vi) Mayor Burns advised that Darren Hollingsworth is going to C hicago on the 24'" to speak at a Brown fields Conference on the C at y of Englewood "s accomplishments . (b) Council Member's Choice (i) Council Member Garrett : I . He said he wanted to mention that there are two candidate forums corru ng up this week. The first one is tomorrow at 9 :30 a .m . with the South Metro Realtors group and there 1s one on Thursday. at about 11 :30 a .m .. with the Chamber at Englewood High School. Counc il Member Bradshaw advised that it will be held at the A VS Restaurant . Council Member Yurchick asked where the forum will be held tomorrow. Counc tl Member Garrett advised that it will be at Mineral and Broadway on the northeast comer. Council Member Bradshaw noted that actually that ts an mterv1ew. an mtervte\\ for fundmg . "ith th e South Metropolitan Board of Realtors . 2. He stated he was somewhat surprised at !he numbers for the Bates stallon . I don·1 know whether anyone else was surprised at the $4 million price tag. he said. but part of o ur cha ll enge o n th e 29 th is to look at the funds we have available. our budget limits and then try to make those numbers fit our budget. Mayor Bums opined that there is some room in there for some changes and some saving s . We so rt of got a hint of this when we went down and spoke before the Southwest Corridor Committee, he sa id, because a number was flipped on !he table that kind of jolted us a bit, because we had no idea that the y were looking at those kind of numbers . I think there are things we can do with this , he said, and 1t is not easy, but I think we can get this done . I think the board really is supportive, he said, and I think the step process the y described is pretty clear on how we can approach this and get moving along on it. Mayor Bums stated it is not easy and none ofus are terribly pleased with how expensive it looks like that is going to be. (ii) Council Member Bradshaw: 1. She advised City Manager Sears that we probably need to call Heather Hunt and Paige Bradshaw, who appeared before us, and let them know that, if Council is going to contribute , we will probably contribute individually. Or. she asked , should we contribute as a group . Council Member Nabholz felt Council should contribute as a group . Council Member Yurchick opined that at our budget meeting we should set aside X amount of dollars in our contributions for this type of thing . I mean we tum down one person, he sai d, and I hate to se le c t another. for whatever reason . But ifwe ha ve some funds se t aside, it makes it a little easier to make the contributions. Council Member Bradshaw said, then, it would be first come, first served. Council Member Yurchick said that would be correct . Mayor Burns said he thought that was an excellent suggestion, because we have been in kind of a difficult position of choosing one and not the other and for no real reason, necessarily, as to why we are making the distinction . Council Member Yurchick suggested they might consider splitting it in half. half the first half of the yea r and w owr half the second half of the year. . , I • 0 • • -• Englewood City Council September 17, 2001 Page 14 • • -... Council Member Bradshaw agreed , as there are many programs that are important . Because. for instance . she asked, how do you pick the Arthritis Foundation over the Race for the Cure . You just can 't. o I agree . she said, and I think we probably need to come up with a policy statement Council Member Garrett said, from my perspective, when I saw thi s I didn't think we would con tnbuw as a Council and so I made an individual decision as to whether I was going to support thi s o r not. Mayor Bums asked Council if that was their consensus. that Council should make individual de 1s 1ons on thi s . Council Member Bradshaw opined that. on this one , they need to make indi vidual dec1s 1on s . he ga,e It) Manager Sears their phone number. She said that was their contact and th ey called her at home to gn c ht'r the number. In response to City Manager Sears , Ms . Bradshaw confirrned that he should ca ll them and kt th em kn o11 that Council will contribute indi,•idually. 2 . She noted that Council keeps bringing back. and talking about , the Mile Hi g h Housin g Fund . was talking to Cheryl St. Clair today, she said. and I was asking her what we could do locall y I am not again st participating in this housing fund , she said. but when we're looking at a budget cru n h an I the y are looking at $250.000.00 for a board member, then I have a problem with that. And ma ybe 11 e don 't have to be on the board . But , she noted , the minimum contribution 1s $50,000.00 . I asked '.'vi s . St. C lair II hat II e could do, m the C n y of Englewood . if Council contributed $50.000 .00 to the Ho us ing Authorit y. he aid that would make ten down payments, for ten renters to turn them into ten homeowners. That 1s ho w mu c h we could do on a local level , she said . This is just food for thought and I don 't know that we have to make a decision this evening. My concern is that Englewood itself only makes up 2.6% of the whole consortium and we don't have the large amount of developable land that Aurora and Denver do and the y compnsc 6 8° o or 69%. So we would be giving money to the consortium and saying yes we believe in hou mg . but no ne ofit would be coming back to Englewood, because we don't have the land . M y opinion is that the $50,000.00 could be better spent. This is an Englewood project that we could do. with the sa me a mou nt of mone y . She asked that Council just think about it. I think if we could turn ten renters into ten ho meowners for $50.000.00 , she said, then that 1s a deal. Mayor Bums commented that he thinks part of that que st ion is what do we do with the other $700,000 .00 plus that we got out of this . We got a huge amount of money out ofth1s, he said . Council Member Bradshaw pointed out that it looks like we ha ve a bill coming on a station . Ma yo r Burns said sure and I unders tand that. I have been called by the Metro Mayor 's Caucus and asked what they can expect and I told them fifty at the most. But, he pointed out , we got a very large amount of mone y out of the bonds , much more so than cities larger than we are and my position is that I would like to see us contribute at least the minimum. But, he said. I think we should take it up at the budget session and that would give us a better chance to discuss it and give our opinions. Council Member Bradshaw said she just wanted to let Council know that there are other avenues out there and if we do $50.000 .00 a year, for ten years, that would be I 00 homeowners . (iii) Council Member Yurchick noted that C hris Olson and his staff gave a presentation at the last ACE meeting about the Building Department and how the building perrnil proce ss and the inspection works and how the Fire Department ties into those inspections . I personally found it really informative, he said, because I didn 't understand how a lot of that stuff tied together. I think the ACE group appreciated that too . But, he said, one of the things that came out of it was that at the end of each building permit process. Lance Smith sends out a Performance SuNey. He reads them and stick s them in a notebook . but there is no tally. Mr. Yurchick suggested that ma ybe he could do a s urvey. a long • ) I • 0 • • • Englewood City Council September 17. 2001 Page 15 • • • • • .. .. the lines of the c itizen surve y, where the information could be quantified, and ma ybe trend s looked at and problem areas identified. He pointed out that the information is there. but it is not being put in the proper format . Council Member Grazulis agreed that that was a good idea because the y do get so man y questions regarding that process . Mayor Bums agreed that that was a good idea. 13 . City Manager's Report (a) City Manager Sears noted that Director Long had undergone sur gery. but he cam~ ba ck to work today and he is doing quite well. 14 . Cit)' Attorney's Report City Attorney Brotzman did not have any matters to bring before Counci l. 15 . Adjournment The me e tin g adjourned at 8:32 p .m. • . ' ) .. • I ... I • 0 32X • 1. 2. 3 . Call to order. ... ,.,... . • • - AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL AftJAJJ"9A¥,-SEPTEMBER 17, 2001 7:30 P.M. Engl ewo od Ci v ic Center 1000 Englewo od Parkway Englewood, CO 80110 In vocation./)~ Pledge of Allegiance . ~ 4 . RollCall. f./ ~/ /4Jfu,d-(IAJOl()SfAj 5. Minutes. ) ~d I,--(} ,. M;""'" from "" m,e,;"g o iReg"'" m y Co""'n M,e,;"g ol Se p<e mb e, ,. ,oo 1.¥ Scheduled Visitors . (Please limit y our presentation to ten minutes.) 6. ff Unscheduled Visitors. (Please limit y our presentation to, ~v e m inutes .) a.. '::/(Ell t,A) HOE.L~I!.. ( tMS I ,..~ ., 11/UIJ~ 7. 8 . Communicati o ns , Proclamations, and App ointments. A proclamation declaring September 19, 2001 as Ra c e Equality Day.~ ~fl-Oa. ~ /. O b . A p roclamati o n declaring the w eek of September 16 throu§ti }'2 , 3001 as Ye ll ow vyri,c Ill-Ribbon Youth Sui ci de Awarenes s and Pre v ention Week. g~W/'"" 1 /!J.ID>~f ·~ -0 c. A resolution aooomtlng Judge M arcia O 'Brien as Associate Municipal Judg e.~ - 11-J.. A PRDt..L>MA-rtoAJ tlJ WoAJot..~t 1H£LJl)fS. {.()~of~ H~t~ff(bs. . ., . Olti.Pt./tVet) DUR/A" 1)/£ j.)~olJ~ u A) 91 9. P hcHearm~e~d) ~ , ,j.kA~.1:., TO I~ f'f!1' ~ ---CJ a. A u li e Hearing to g~e~nput o n th~~le;;o';rs"p1,po sed 2002 Budget. Copies of the proposed "Budget in Brief" will be available in the Library, the finance D~partment, and the City Manager's Office. f t.lr#J k-t:, f.Y4t.i.4)) I U- 01/JW BUii · Please note: If you have a disability and need auxiliary aids or semen, please notify City of Englewood (303-i62·2405) at least 48 hours in advance of when semen are needed. Thank you . • . , I • 0 - • • Englew ood Cit y Council Agend a September I 7, 200 I Page 2 .•. • 1 • • ... • - ~-~o-~enda. ~ ~;J.,,.,,1~ ~Lo, IOb-ir-i/f-C ;° ttppr/ a. ~~nance~ding. -,-....-,""'J - b . Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading . i. ii. Council Bill No. 56 , accepting a Highway Traffic Safety Pr o jec t Grant fr o m the Colorado State Department of Public Health and Envir o nm ent in th e am o unt oi $4 ,200. Council Bill No. 57, accepting the dedication of 22 square feet of ri ght-o f-\,a at 2001 W . Baker Avenue. c. Resolutions and Motions. i. Recommendation from the Library Department to approve a mo ti on auth o rizing the Library to apply to the State of Colorado for funds under the annual State Grants to Libraries program . STAFF SOURCE: Hank long. Director of Library Services. 11. Regular Agenda . a. Approval of Ordinances on First Reading. i. COUNCIL BILL NO. 59 -Recommendati o n fr o m th e U tiliti es Department to {t{;Jir/ ~-/ . adopt a bill for an ordinance authorizing a Cit Ditc h license Agreement with ~J,J , ~fr\ TCI Cablevision of Georgia/ AT&T Broadband . STAFF SOURCE: Stewart H. · '.,)Fonda, Director of Utilities.~ b. C . ii. COUNCIL BILL NO. 60 -Recommendati o n fr o m the City Manager's Offi ce to adopt a bill for an ordinance approving the Third Amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement with the Regional Transportation District (RTD ), reimbursing the City of Englewood for work performed by the City and the Englewood Environmental Foundation on be~~ of ~Tq. STAFF SOURCE: Michael Flaherty, Assistant City Manager. {'if~ Approval of Ordinances on Se c ond Reading. ReLs and Motions. i. !fpdl/-0 Recommendation from the Littleton/Englewood Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisory Committee to approve, by motion, Amendment 1 to the Professional Engineering Services Contract with Brown & Caldwell in the amount of $5 ,950,364 for Phase 2 Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements. STAFF SOURCE: Stewart H. Fonda, Utilities Director.~ • ii. Recommendation from the Littleton/Englewood Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisory Committee to approve, by motion, Amendment 2 to the Proiessional Engineering Services Contract with Brown & Caldwell in the am ount of $518.788 for Disinfection Wastewater Treatment Plant l!h1. ,J A /,, • _ Improvements. STAFF SOURCE: Stewart H. Fonda, Utilities Director.()~ Please note: If you haw il diubility illld need ilUxilury ilich or services, please notify the Oty of Englewood (303-762-2405) ill least 48 houn in advance of when services are needed. Thank you . • I • 0 -• .. " ...... . . .... 7 ! .. •• • .. Englewood Ci ty Coun ci l Age nda ' Sr.pternb er 1 7, 200 1 Pag !! 3 • 1 2. General Dis cussion . a. Mayor's Choice . b. Council Members' Choice. 13 . City Manager's Report. 14. City Attorney's Report. Adjournment 'j,"3,J. p.-- The following minutes were transmitted to City Council between August 31 and September 13, 2001 : The Englewood Cultural Arts Commission meeting of August 1, :!001 The Englewood liquor licensing Authority meeting of August 15 , 2001 The Englewood Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of August 21 , 2001 Pleue note: If you have a diNbility and Med auirilia,y • or MMCft. pleue notify the City of Englewood (303-762-2405) at least 41 houn in advance of when~ are MeCled. T1lank you. .. • I I • 0 32 • • • l . Call to Order ,. ~-II ·'" ' • • • ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL ENGLEWOOD, ARAPAHOE CO ~TY, COLORADO Regular Session September 4 , 2001 .. The re gular meeting of the Englewood City Council was call ed to order by Mayor Bums at 7:42 p .m . 2. Invocation The invocation was given by Council Member Na bh olz . 3. Pledge of Allegiance The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Bums. 4. Roll Call Prese nt : Absent : A quorum was present. Also present : 5. Minutes Coun cil Members , abholz. Grazuhs. Garrett . Bradshaw Wolosyn. Yurch1ck. Bums None City Manager Sears City Attorney Brotzman Deputy C ity Clerk Castle Deputy C ity Clerk White Assistant City Manager Flaherty Director Ross , Public Works Director Olson, Safety Services Di vision Chief Moore, Safety Services (a) COUNCIL MEMBER WOLOSYN MOVED, Ai"'ID IT WAS SECONDED, TO APPROVE THE MIN UTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 20 , 2001. Ayes : Nays: Abstain: The motion carried . Council Members Garrett , Bradshaw, Wolosyn, Yurchick Grazulis , Burns None Council Member Nabholz [C lerk 's note : this vote .] Council Member Yurcbick advised. after the meeting, that he intended to abstain fro m 6 . Scheduled Visitors ) I • 0 • • • Englewood City Council September 4 , 200 l Page 2 • • • ' (a) Paige Bradshaw and Heather VanderBrakc-Hunt we re present to address City Council regarding the upcoming Arthritis Foundauon Marathon. Ms . Bradshaw thanked C ouncil for the o pportunity to speak to them. She explained that they would be run.n.ing a marathon to benefit th e Arthntis Foundation, so all the money raised would go to that organization. The marathon ,viii be held o n. December 9"' and, between the two of them, they ha,·e to raise $8 ,400 .00. The money, she said. "ill all go to either research or education. Ultimately the goal would be to c ure arthritis altogether. Ms . Bradshaw said they have learned a lot through researching this . There are over l 00 kmds of arthntis . She said they are really excited and are doing it in honor of her father and Ms . Yandt'rBrake -Hunt 's aunt and uncle. because run.n.ers are asked to pick an honoree for whom to nm. She said they were here tonight to present their financial goal to Council and ask for their support. Ms . VanderBrake-Hunt said the y wanted Council to ask them why they should mves t in their cause . She sa id there are several reasons. She said she grew up in Englewood and was a product of Englewood Public Schools and had come back after several ye ars of being out of state to serve the community. She said s he and Ms. Bradshaw both work at Englewood Recreation Center. domg personal traming and fi tnt'ss for people who live in the community. We think thi s will benefit people who uffer from anhntis, which affects one in six Americans. There was an article in Newsweek on September 3'd. he advi sed. about arthritis and how many Americans it affects . We would be running in honor of them and help mg to educate and serve them_ since they are not able to do tt thernsel\'es. she said. We al o thmk 11 \\111 benefit the community, because, as City employees and fimess trainers. we believe 11 1 impo rtant to pra c u ce wha t you preach. and we feel we would be able to do that, not only by trammg o urse h ·es. but al so u mg the mone y for a greater cause . Finally, we feel that we . ourselves. wo uld benefit from thi s be ausc. ob"ousl y, we are getting in better shape. which helps us serve our clients. but also II ha s J U t been a good oppom,mty to serve others . She asked Council to consider whether the y would be abl e to support them as a ounc1l. and also indi viduall y, as yo u see how thi s might benefit yo u. your falllll y members o r fri end s . Ms . Bradshaw passed out fl yers to Council regarding the marathon . Ms . VanderBrake-Hunt stated that the y are passionate about this cause because they emce o many of their own clients who are all different ages and abilities in the area of fitnes s . The y ha\'e a lot of sen io r whom they work with and man y of them suffer from this di sease and the y see that the tr work ,an benefit them. Ma yor Bums thanked them for coming. He said they would take it under cons1derauon and ",shed them luck on their fund raising efforts . Council Member Bradshaw asked when the marathon would be. Ms. VanderBrake-Hunt advised that 111 s the Honolulu Marathon on December 9"'. 7. Unscheduled Visitors Mayor Bums advised that we often have confusion when we have public hearings. There are a number of people who signed as unscheduled visitors because of the animal control issues we have before us torught. We are having a public hearing on those issues, which is not part of the unscheduled visi tors . If you want to speak on the animal conrrol issues, you should speak at the public hearing, because that is the official record of the comments about the animal control ordinances. If you speak in the unscheduled visitor category, he stated, you will not be part of the public record on the animal control issues. Ma ybe some of you have signed on both, he said, but the unscheduled visitors may speak for up to five minutes . We invite anyone to speak on anything they want to , but almost everyone who signed on this unscheduled visi tor list have said they want to speak on the animal control issues. Mayor Burns said he would call all the names. because they have s igned, but if they want to speak at the public hearing on animal control. he asked that they speak there and not under unscheduled visitors, because they would be making a record on the wrong • ) I • 0 • • • Englewood C ity Council September 4 , 2001 Page 3 • .. ~ - pan of the agenda . As I go down the list , indicate to me if you are Mllmg to speak at the publt c hear ing on animal conrrol. rather than under unscheduled visitors , he said. (a) Kevin LaPrise, 2931 South Clarkson, said he signed both and ha s another is ue . He said his other issue was the concrete issue. He said he understands that a nun1ber ofus have ele ted to p,y a cenain fee each month toward that function . Three years ago , he said. he watched some ofh1 s nei ghb o rs get their curbs and sidewalks fixed , and they were not nearly as in need of repair as his was . He thank ed Council Member Nabholz for being very responsive. He called her at home and she go t some thm gs moving. He said hi problem 1s that. when he ca ll ed the office to ask why they passed him. 1t wa s very difficult to get someone to come out. When they did. they could not find where he needed the repairs. Counci l Member Nabholz had no problem finding th e area in need of repairs . Also . he said it took him a couple of times to get someone to come out and actually find that area. Ms . Nabhol z informed me that it would be done this June . He said he understands that not everything is within her power. bu t It has not ye t been done . He said he ha s some lovel y purple dots and arrows on hi s sidewa lk , which md1 cate a co mm g repair project. He said he wonders if that is, indeed, going to happen . Ken Ross , Director of Public Works . stated that is exactl y right. We are doing our pre -co nstruc ti on conference with our co ntra ctor this week_ and the y will be gettmg staned probably next we~k. T hey ,re going to stan on one end of town and going through Englewood in a systematic wa y. Th ey are not go mg to be jumping all over the place, so I don 't want to give you an y expectation tha t the y are go mg to be out there next week. But, once they get staned, they will progress a ll the wa y through town . he said . 1 r u ha s been marked, it is pan of the program for this year, he advised. Mr. LaPrise said that was very encouraging . He thanked Director Ross . (b) Be v Cununins, 3441 So uth Broadway, said she kept waiting for others to come and talk to Council about sidewalk sales, but now we are right down to the nirty-gritty . We don ·t reall y have even a month to horse around here between times and get it going . She asked if there was a chance that the y could push it up a little to about the middle of September. it wou ld really help . Mayor Burns asked if it was scheduled now . City Manager Sears said he did not know the proces s right off the top of his head, but he felt that two a year we re allowed and that there was a request by the business association to have a sidewalk sale under our ordinance. He said he did not sec any reason why we could not proceed with that, but he would have to check. Assistant City Ma na ger Flaherty advised that the current policy allows for two sidewalk sa les a year, however, in order to qualify, the y must have at least five contiguous business owners appl ying for the sidewalk sale , and they wo ul d apply to the Community Development Depanrnent. Ms . Cummins asked who that would be . Mr. Flaherty said the Community Development Depanrnent 1s on the third floor here at the Civic Center, and the director is Bob Simpson . (c) Bill Clayton, 958 East Cornell Avenue , said he was thinking on his wa y down that it was such a pleasant evening, it is a nice time to be living in your car, because the weather is so pleasant . He distributed a lener to Council and said he wou ld be brief. He said he really was not going to talk to th em about living in yo ur car. House of Hope is a family resource center and shelter for families . We have taken over the old Arapahoe House detox building and, since January, have been providing shelter primarily to women with children . The biggest drawback to us increasing our capacity is that it is an old building , it was bui lt as a convent, and it has all kinds of problems that make it difficult for us . One of the most pressing issues is the need for a residential sprinkler system to protect the residents in case of a fire. What a catastrophe if you were a small child, li ving in an unfamiliar place, and the building were to catch fire . We have engaged an engineering company, they ha ve done a fine job for us , and we have selected a contractor. We are on the verge of embarking on this project, which will cost us about $30 ,000.00 . Mr . • .. ) I • 0 • • -• Engl ewood City Council September 4 , 200 I Page 4 • • - ... ' Clayton said he was here this evening to ask if the City would consider waiving the pennit fee for the sprinkler system . Cenainly, if you can 't do that, we will find a way to pay for it . This is an imponant project and we have to get it done, so we would appreciate your consideration on that. Most of the fund s that suppon this project are public funds, or donated funds . so it is going to come from there , probabl y. anyway. We have prevailed on the Englewood Small Business Development Corporation to loan us some immediate cash so we can pay our contractor, because we really don 't have the money in the bank . We ar c using a CBDG grant , thanks to the effons of Janet Grimmett. who assisted us through the City and through Arapahoe County. If all goes well , since our CBDG grant expires September 15"', we will ha ve thi s proj ect done by then, and will be able to increase our capacity and will be able to take intact farruli es. W e reall y can ·1 do that right now, since our capacity just is not big enough. He thanked Council for their consideration and said he would be happy to take questions . We can all be ve ry proud to ha,·e thi s fa c tl11 y in our community, he concluded . It is doing a line job and the neighbors seem to be very mu ch 111 supp ort of it and it is a good project for us . Mayor Bums told Mr. Clayton that Council appreciates his work on thi s. as II i qu ite a yeoman ·s effort that he has made on this facility . It is quite an improvement over what we had there before . he said , and o ffer ed congratulations. Council Member Grazulis asked how long the women with children actuall y li ve there . What is their average stay? Mr. Clayton said the intention is that they would stay ninety days. and dunng that time , they can save their money, get a job, get their kids in child care and then transition into a more permanent type of housing . Everyone ·s best effons and best intentions are not always born out m reahty, he allo wed . Once someone comes to the House of Hope. we can ·1 make them sta y. The experience ha s been 1hat the y generally stay less time than that. One of the reasons that the sta ys have not been as long as we would lik e. is that we have not had the money to afford adequate case management . We have another CDBG grant 1ha1 is funding two case managers that staned in July, and Mr. Clayton felt that would help, because the se folk s can obtain some additional assistance in life choices and life skills. He felt they would stay a little longer, so that when they do leave, they will be more successful . He did not know if there was an average, as the y have people stay as shon as a week or two and don ·1 like the rules, or they sometimes stay the entire mn ety days. Ninety days is our intention, he said. Council Member Bradshaw asked about the cost of the pennits . Mr. Clayton said he did not know, but imagined it would be about three and a half percent of the cost of the j ob . Our contractor has bid ii at $23,000.00, he said, not including the tanks, which are another $6 ,000.00 , so we are looking at about $30,000.00. He did not think the engineering would be figured in the pennit fee , so he thought they were probably looking at about $900.00. Director Olson asked, ifhe were able to find that out tonight, whether it would help them make a decision . Ms . Bradshaw said yes , but she did not have a problem with it anyway. City Manager Sears said Council could come back to this issue . '.'vtayor Bums said yes , we have a very full agenda . Ms . Bradshaw said we need to get back to them in a timely manner. * * * *. Mayor Bums said another thing we can do for those who signed on the unscheduled visitors for animal control issues is call them first when we get to the public bearing on animals, since they probably got here early. He said he would continue down the list to sec if they wish to speak at the public hearing. Mayor Bums read the following names , all of whom stated that they would like to speak at the public hearing : Mary Hoeft, Stan Munyon, Virginia Saucier, Vernon Tate, Ron Zito , Joe McCue . The last name on the list was illegible and there was no response to Mayor Burns' pronunciation of the name . Sandra Banlett had signed but did not want to speak at all. • .. ) I • 0 • • • Eng lewood C ity Coun cil September 4 , 2001 Page 5 ,,, • .. • -' Mayor Bums asked if there was an yone else who wished to addre ss Counc il. There was no re s po ns e . 8. Communications, Proclamations and Appointments There were no conununications, proclamations or appoinnnents . 9 . Public Hearing Mayor Bums advised that Agenda Items 9 (a) and (b) would be considered m one public hearing . He stat ed that two public hearings are scheduled, and. after talking with the City Attorney. and s inc e man y o f those present would like to speak 10 both issues, he felt that legally we could hold both publi c hearing s at th e same time . If you want to talk about the leash law, that is fine , if you want 10 talk about the number o f d ogs and cats , you can do that all at once, he advised. COUNCIL MEMBER GARRETT MOVED. AND IT WAS SECONDED, TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING TO GATHER INPUT ON COUNCIL BILLS NO. 36 AND 37, A .. \'IENDI'.'IG TITLE 7. CHAPTER IA OF THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE. PERTAINING TO DOGS Ai'IID CATS AND THE NUMBER OF ANlMALS MAINTAJNED PER HOUSEHOLD OR PRDIISES. Ayes: Council Members N abholz . Garrett , Brads haw. Wo losyn Yurchick, Grazulis, Bums Nays: None The motion carried and the Public Hearing opened. All persons giving testimony were duly sworn . Parral Operations Division Chief Moore, of the Deparrrnent of Safety Serv i es. ad 1sed that tom ght. Council had before them two bills for ordinances, Council Bills No. 36 and 3 . Co unc il 8111 :\'o . 36 de als pnmarily with the leash law, to put it in the briefest terms, although there are eleve n actual c hanges 10 T ul e 7 . C hapter I A , dealing with animals . and various aspects of the animal ordinances m the C ny o f Englewood. This includes dealing with animal care and animal cruelty issues , amo ng some o ther lan guag e changes in the ordinance. Counc il Bill No. 37 deals primarily wnh the issue of the number of dogs an d cats that a household may or may not keep in the City of Englewood . Essentiall y, the language for these 1wo council bills was developed through the work of the Code Enforcement Advisory Committee, in consultation with staff, over a period of several months . What you have before you is the languag e that 1s being proposed with some adjusnnents by the Code Enforcement Advisory Committee. Council is co nducting a public hearing to address these two bills . Div1 s1on C hief Moore inrroduced in to the record the Proof of Publication of the Notice of Public Hearing, which appeared m the Englewood Herald on August I 0 , 2001, giving notice to the public of this hearing. Mayo r Bums stated that it was not legally necessary to have a public hearing on these ordinances, but Counc il felt the public would like to have input on them. Division Chief Moore introduced the chairman of the Code Enforcement Advisory Committee, Don Roth, who spoke to the issue of how these ordinances were formulated . Don Roth, 28 3 0 South Sherman Srreet. stated that he was chairman of the Code Enforcement Adviso ry Comnuttee, which is a mouthful , so from here on out, we will use the acronym CEAC. He inrroduced the members of the committee who were present. Present were Bill McCahill, Edna Blair, Bryan DesManeau, and Ruth Hansen. He said they began in 1998 , when the committee was reviewing the nuisance abatement ordinance that was before them and at that time, they became aware of a number of issues in the code that were weak or had ambiguous language. The animal issue section was one that came to the forefront, prunarily the issue of the leash law or lack thereof. Essentially, the way the code reads now, the leash law I • 0 • • • Englewood City Counc il September -1 , 200 I Page 6 • • - is. in essence. un enforceable unle ss th ere is a n anack mv olved. Mr. Roth said the y kep t putnng it off because they knew it would be a hot topic . A little over a year ago . Englewood resident s Ruth and ~ed Ste el anended a CEAC meeting to express th eir concern about weaknesses in the Englewood '.\1um c,pal Code re ga rding the humane neatmenl of ammal s . The y agreed to do some resea rch and provide us wn h some recommendations as to wha t the y felt hould be m th ose sec ti ons . He mterJC Cted that Ruth te e ! "as go in g to address Council later, so it would be best to ask her an y questt ons the y mt gln ha,·e about th at. The committee looked at the code provid e d by the S teels . They also had somethm g else th at helped them make th e decision to go ahead and addre ss a number of the animal issues at once . T hat "a the fact that . hortl ) after coming aboard a s the Code Enforcement Supe rvisor, Dave L)1tn began pro,·idmg EA "ah monthl y activity repons regarding what was being done by the Code Enforcement personnel. It detailed the numbers m some of the different categorie s , and by the time the te e ls came to us. we ha d a years wo rth o f data to look at . so 11 was ob\"lo us that it needed to be addre sed. when ll ca me to look mg at ammal issue . We looked at the code. both as pet owners. because a number o f us are pet owner , and "e looked at II fro m the vie wpo int of neighbors of pet owners. and most ofus fall into tha t ca tegory . Bo b :'.l oorc and Da\"e Lynn also prO\ ided us wnh the viewpoint from the enfo rcement 1de . and '.\li ke Flaherty from the c,ry mana ge ment s ide . Over th e ensum g mon th s. the co mmince dis sected th 1 code. sente nce by enten e. phra se by phrase . We did a lot ofcunmg and laboring at length o,er md1\"ldual "ord. 111 o me cas e. or phrases. The idea wa that. 1f II made sense . make it enforceable, and 1f II doe n ·t mak e se nse. ge t nd or 11 . Our goal wa s to more clearl y define th e re s ponsi bili ty that pet owners have to the ir pe ts. the ir neig hbors and to th e communay as a whole . Coun ci l Bill ~o. 36 is th e re suh o f those d1sc uss 1o ns. he said . Fo r the benefit of the c 111zens pre ent . '.\<Ir . Ro th stated that the Code Enforcement Ad, ,sor, ornm1ttt'e 1s a gro up o f c ni ze ns. wh o mee t on a monthl y bas is . T hey li sten to mput fr om peopl e su h a the Steels. wh o co me to them wnh pro blems \\·e try to li sten an d act o n them as bes t "e can . 'lt1mat cly. we are an advi sory c omrrun ee, and Co un c il gets to make the final decis ion . At thi s po mt . oun 1! Bill ~o . 36 1s our ad vice . On ome of the se is ue s, as the large crowd would dictate . th e vie wpo ints ar e rath er polanzcd . There ar e some who fee l that an enforceable leash law is unne cessary . La t month th ere wa a young lad y up her e showi ng us the ribbons that she had won from her dog tram mg, and 1t 1s reall y wonde rful to see tha1 so rt o f thin g . If every dog in Englewood was named like th at. we would not be here . The problem is that tl11s 1s not the case. In order for her to win those ribbons. she and her dog had to demon trat e that the y were above average, even when compared to other dogs and th e ir namers. ln Englewood. th ere ar c th ousands of dogs whose nainmg consi sts of a rolled up news paper. The que sti on before yo u is whether we are wt ll mg to place that same leve l of trus t on thousands of dogs as we do on the se few that ha \"e undergone all thi s training . Our monthl y code enforcement statistics tell us that this is not th e case . Dunng the fir st seven months of the calendar year 200 I, there ha ve been over 170 rep on s of constantl y barking dogs . over 600 repons of animal s at-large , there ha ve been O\"er fifty repons of animal cruelty, and mos t di sturbing of all. there ha ve been forty-sev en animal attacks reponed through the first seven months of the year. These have resulted m 150 su mmonses . and over 300 animals ha ve been nansponed to the animal she lt er. La st month . the Colorad o Humane Society reponed to you that the y had received 629 animals fro m Englewood in the calendar ye ar 2000 . These are bi g numbers for any city, especially a c ity of 30,000 , he o pined . According to the DM G Maximus repon on code enforcement presented in August of 2000, Englewood ha s the highe s t populatton density in Colorado for cities with a population of over 30.000 people. As new development co ntinue s. that population density is on the rise. eighbors are being closer and close r together. Englewood is no w an urban city and the rural standards of the past are no longer sufficient . Therefore, the C EAC encourages you to pass Co un ci l Bill . o . 36 , he said. For s irrular reasons, the CE AC opposes Co uncil Bill No . 3 7 as it is currently presented, he advised . The actual code that is currently enforced read s that a si ng le residence ma y house either two dogs or cats . That language is somewhat amb ig uous, he felt. A conservative interpretation, which probably was what the original intent was, but it is hard to tell becau se 11 was written so long ago , is that the limit was two dogs or two cats . A more liberal interpretation is two dogs and two cats , and this is what has been enforced by the Code Enforcement Di vision for the la st several years . The C EA C unanimously suppons thi s liberal interpretation and we would like to see yo u amend Counc il Bill No . 37 to reflect tho se limits . he assened. As it currentl y stands, Counci l Bill No. 37 increa se s the limit to four animals of any species . The CEAC feels that number of ammals in a single ya rd. es peciall y considering the small size of many of the yards m Englewood, is JUSt too man y. Mamtainm g • I • 0 • • • Englewood City Co uncil September 4 . 200 I Page 7 • , . • - tha t man y anunals "ould be diffic ult wi tho ut infringing upon the neighbors, and noise and o dors are probably the pnmary iss ues here . CEAC wo uld suppon a grandfather clause that allows re s idents who c urrent ly have a third dog to keep it, but we would ask that the g randfather clause thi s t ime have a stanmg date, so we don 't ha,e a perpetua l grandfather c lause like the current regulation. He asked if there were any questions. :Vla yo r Bums a ked if the present code is being enforced as two dogs and two cat s. \-Ir. Ro th said yes, that is the wa y it has been en forced fo r the last few yea rs . and that is what the conunittee suppons. W e JUSt wa nt to lan fy the language so it says two dogs and two cats. Council Member Garrett asked how he proposes the grandfathering to work. Mr. Roth said , bas icall y, to se t a da te , whenever this o rdinance goes into effect, th at the grandfather clause would start then. so tha t an~ dog that was livi ng at a res idence as of th at date would be allowed to conunue to ltve there unul It wa deceased, at whic h time the y would be limited to two ani mal s . Mr. Garrett asked about someone wh o moves int o Englewood. Mr. Ro th said they would be staning wi th two. Mr. Garrett sa id th~y wo u ld ha,~ to get nd ofa dog 1f the y o wn three . Mr. Ro th said they would if the y move m after the o rdmance goes 11110 effect. Mayo r Bums a ked ,f other members of the CEAC were going to sp eak. Mr. Roth a id he 1ma g111ed ,f the y want to s peak. th ey would do it along with the public . Ma yo r Bums asked ,f anyone else from staff or Code En fo rcement wanted to s peak at th , umc Th~re "" no one who wa nted to s peak. Mary Hoeft. 3689 So uth Galapago Street, asked if they were allowed to talk abo ut a111mal cruel ty la" . too. as that was m the Oye r that they got. Ma yo r Bums said yes. and asked that all remarks be kept to five nunute or lcs t try to a o nunodate everyone prese nt. M . Hoeft sa id s he has lived in the E ng lewood!Littl eton area fo r her entire ltfe he aid he I sometimes referred to as the dog lady by animal contro l becau e he picks up all the tray that he find s and ometimes he needs th eir help to catch them. She said she call s them from her car. he said s h e never had a pet until s ix years ago when her hu sband m sis ted they ge t a reall y big dog. he le arned ,·ery qu1ckl ) fr o m this dog that animals have feelings and emotions, and that all the y rea ll y need besides food. water and shelter, is love . Since that time , she ha s picked up over sevent een dog , which she brought ho m e . For those with tags . s he contacts the d ogs ' 0 "11ers , and rakes them over the coa ls about their dogs bemg loo e. For the o nes th at d o n 't have tags, s he runs found ads m the papers and then proceeds to fi nd th e m a good ho me if they are no t claimed. This number d oes no t incl ude the o ne s that ha ve been loose that sh e has simply chase d ho me in her car, she said. That is o ne of the tncks that sh e has learned over the last coup!~ of yea rs, that if yo u j u st chase them, they mi g ht go home and j ump over their own fence . This number also does not include those that she fee ls are emotionally ne g le cted that, with the owner's pennission , she visi ts every day. These include junk yard dogs, and dogs that are chai ned in yards without regular attention from th eir owners. I v isi t the se dogs because I feel sorry for them, she said. They may have what the law require s as far as foo d , water and shelter, but be yond that, they really don't ha ve much of a life. This is j u st to let yo u know that I care about all dogs, and not just the ones that I share my home with. We ne ve r dri ve past any dog that is loose o n the street, and I have even picked up one on the freewa y. Ms. Hoeft felt that the number of dogs should be raised to four. She said that people who can prove that the y can provide a lo vi ng home for animals should be able to take care of more. The way we will prove this to everyone is that all of o ur animals will be fixed , be up on their shots and in a home where the y are visibly being well cared for. This does not mean chained up in the back yard or animals that never go into the house. Ms . Hoeft fe lt thi s would go hand in hand with some kind oflicensing ordinance. She said s he and her husb and ha ve been brainstorming for weeks about how this could work, about a grandfather clause, and how will it • I • 0 - • • • Eng le wood C ity Council Septembe r 4 , 200 I Page 8 I' .. • • - affe ct anima ls th at are alread y in Englewood that are alread y fixed . These are thin gs th at ca n be figur ed out as we get closer, but thi s is the first step in controlli ng the over population pro blem. We ha ve to mak e people more accountable 1f the y "~sh to be guardian s of other li ving creatures . Allowing people more do gs can work. she as sened. if peo ple can prove the y are responsible , lo ving guardians. Regarding the lea sh la w. she felt that when out with th eir owners on th e street. the y should be o n a lea sh or under vo ic e co ntro l. Obviously, the pomt was made about the dog that wa s very well trained and mo st of them are not. but th ey should be able to go into a fen ced park and take the lea sh off and throw the ball , and thin gs like th at. Re gaxding cruelty and neglect , Englewood can lead the wa y in the fight towards complacenc y about ammal s. All too often. I see no water dish , or a drop of water in the bonom of a five gall on bu cket. or froze n water. This is where some of that extra mone y from the hcensing can be put toward s code enfor cement. At the present time , I feel that Code Enforcement has such limited powers. all the y can re all y enfo rce is the sta te laws, food , water. shelter and shade . It would be imp os sible to check all the ammal s on a reg ular ba si . For example . the y cou ld inve stigate a dog , and th e 0\\11er could say the y fo rgot to till the water to day. Two weeks lat er, the y could say the same thing. How lon g will It be before they ca n do so mething about It. she asked , and make that person pa y, or educate th em o r whatever. First of all. sh~ opmed , we need people o ut in th e field who can drive up and do\\11 th e stree ts and alleys and fi nd the,e dog s whose care is que stionable . Perhap s it could be vo lunte ers. as th is is so methmg th at I al read) do. h~ aid . Then. we need to make the laws tougher , so when animal co ntrol ge ts to the house. the v ac tuJ II) hJ , e ome real authority . If it is not j ust educating people . then the y have to be ab le to htt them "here the) can fee l It. whi ch is in their wallet. Ms. Hoeft said she co nsiders herse lf a visionary . I hope for the day "hen I can drive down the street and not see a dog chained up in the yard . or Junk yard logs tha t ll\e c,ery JI 111 the bli stering heat or the freezing cold, in a tin y pen. iso lated from human contact, onl y 10 be let out at 111ght 11110 an empry concrete yard . alone again until th e next da y when th e ir pathenc hfe star s all o , er J gJ111. he said . We need to ha ve empathy for these creature s. We need to be aware th at they e\l t. and the1c Jr~ man y junk ya rd dogs in the City of Englewood . We nee d to be sen sitiv e to their teehngs 1 here I no difference between these dogs who hav e no life , no spark in the tr eyes be cau se the y ha, e g" en up hope . and the spoiled dogs that I share my hou se with, ex ce pt love. Tln s ordinance ould g1H more opportuntt1c, to animals in shelters that are just waiting for a good home , she said . Ms Hoe ll aid she \\as, er, c. rned about the C iry 's decision to take step s toward be commg more human e . he aid she loves II here 111 Englewood and is confident, with people who are de vo ted to work mg togethe r and ma~m • tlm an c, en better city for its companion animals , we "i ll lead th e wa y and msp,re o ther cl!les to fol io" -he ;,a,J ,he brought pictures of the animals that she viStt s every da y on a da il y baS1S . whi ch ·he mv1te d oun c1! to look at. Stan Munyon , 4135 South Cherokee Street , stated he has lived at this address fo r tlurty-two ye ars . He said he is concerned about the number of ca ts and dogs . If e veryone was as canng ab out ammal s as the previous speaker, then we would not hav e a problem. But "e do have a problem. he as se rted . and 11 1s a problem the y ca n 't even take care of no w. I li ve in a good neighborhood. he said. wi th good neighbors. There are about three cats that run free at ni gh t, especially in the sununer time, every ni gh t. The cat s fi ght in the front ya rd , in the back ya rd and on my patio . Mr . Munyon said he got up at 2 o 'clock m the mommg to try to run them off so he could sleep. He said hi s request to Council is please don 't make the man er worse than it is right now . He said he does not know wha t the City can do to take care of hi s problem. and he does not want to tum the se people in, and he said he was unsure where all the cats belong. Somenmes people will move away from the neighborhood and leave a cat . When we know about it , we try to do something, but yo u don ·1 alwa ys know. evenheless, it is a problem that we ca nnot rake care o f now . He again asked Coun ci l to please not increase the problem . Virginia Saucier, 4165 South Fox Street. said she ha s been an Englewood resident smce 19 76. She agreed wn h Mr . Munyon that , to raise the limit on dogs to four , would be horrible. She said she lives in a neighborhood where dogs bark from sunup to sundown and no one ever controls them. My neighbors ha ve two dogs that the y never clean up afler, and the smell is so bad we can ·1 even s it on our patio , she said . I have turned it in to Code Enforcement, and nothing has been done, so now I am goi ng to go to the Arapahoe County health department, because I have a right to si t on my patio and enjoy it without having • I • 0 - • • • Englewood City C ounc il September 4, 2001 Page 9 • • - to smell urine and dog fe ces. People do not take c are o f th e ir dogs, s he sai d . A lot of peo ple do. a nd I have two dogs that are like my children. she sa id , and I e x p ect them to b ehave. but mo st people do no t. Peop le sa y dogs are supposed to bark, but that should only be "hen th ey are ag itated o r a stranger comes 11110 the yard. Ms . Sauc ier said there is a cat that goes in her fl o werbed and you can·t e\'en stand the smell lo ng enough to go out and water and \\eed them. T o let peo ple ha\'e mo re dogs. especi all y in a c ity thi s 1ze. 1s unheard of. C ouncil has made an ordinance where you have to ha,·e tw o peo ple m the nei ghbo rh ood to complain and do anything, and so many people don ·t want to becau e the y are afraid . So ho w can yo u get anything done, she asked. As for a leash law, 1 have a child who had h1 hp taken o ff sewral years ago by a dog that was not on a leash. Ms . Saucier said the y should be o n a leash and no t all o wed to run fre e and pony in everyone 's yard. She felt that Code Enforcement shoul d have mo re ay. and be able to tesu fy 111 court on an animal, instead of their hands being tied where the y can ·t e \'en go before a Jud ge and tcs uiy as to what the y know about the animal. An officer of the law. po h ce o ffi cers . go to co un and testi fy an d s he fe lt C ode Enforcement should also. Vernon Tate, -1 781 South Grant Street. said he had two questi o n s m111 a ll y, and the fi r t o ne \\3 a nswe red by the chairman of the Code Enforcement Advi sory Comminee . T hi s is p ro bably not th e pla ce to bring up the other issue . he allowed, and may be he should be gomg to the CEAC. It ha s to do \\1th the ba rking d og ordinance . He said he was curious why that was not addressed in the amendment of thi s sec ti o n. He sa id. in his experience, the barking dog situation is paramount to all the other complaints that animal c o ntro l peo ple run into. 1 manage some rental units , he said, and under the definitio ns o n th e first page h~rc. regarding adjoining owners/residents, in thi s case, the propenies that 1 mana ge are m a re side ntial area . and 1mrned1atel y adjacent is a commercial zonmg. and, in this commercial area 1s an animal hospual. As id e fr om treatmg amrnals. they also board them . TI1is weekend. they were maxed o ut as far as th e capac ity that the ) could handle. 1 know that because 1 went over and talked to the o wner, he said. and he re me mb ered me because 1 have taken all of our pets to him. When he asked how I was doing. 1 to ld him not too good. be ause my tenants ha,·e been complaining. Mr. Tate said he told him he would like to talk with him and see 1f th1 s could not be kept under control. The owner responded that he mus t be one o f those people who called up and threatened him on the phone. Apparently they had been threatened that poiso n meat wo uld be thrown O\'er the fen ce 1fthe dogs were not kept under control. Mr. Tate said he understands that thi s ,s th e man ' bread and buner, but the units managed by Mr. Tate are his bread and butter, he said . He a sked fo r s uggesuons from Council. ~1a yor Bums aid he was welcome to anend a CEAC meeting, as was everyone . That is what th ey are fo r. he said . Mr. Tate said he 1s the block captain on his block, and has literature from Safety Services about Code Enforcement. It talks about barkmg dogs, he said, and he was just cunous about why the is sue ofbarkmg dogs wa s no t addressed in the revision o f this Title. Mayor Burns suggested that a member ofCEAC might address that, 1fthey are goin g to s peak to mg ht . Ron Zi to . -1 541 South Kalamath Street, said he and his wife moved mto Englewood fi ve months ago. O ne o f the thmgs the y noticed right away was !he number ofbarkrng dogs in their nei ghborhood. For the most pan, he allowed. the neighborhood is pretty quiet, except for the barkmg dogs . He said he asked hi s wife the other night if there was ever a time when they do not hear dogs barking. It 1s very rare , he said, and we have heard dogs barking from as early as 5:30 a .m . and after I :00 a.m. We have counted the number of dogs in our neighborhood, and this is a guess, at, within a block and a half, about twelve dogs . Most of them bark preny constantly. He said he and his wife both like dogs, but most of the people m hi s neighborhood really neglect their dogs . He did not feel it was done on purpose, but most are stuck in their back yards . He said be has only seen one dog in his neighborhood being walked, and that dog has been walked off the leash. One dog out of twelve is not good. he stressed. They need exercise and need to be familiar with their neighborhood, otherwise they are nervous all the time and have a lot ofagitatton. He said he has talked to two of bis neighbors about problem dogs, he said, and called the City to find out what • ) I • 0 • • • Englewood City Cou nci l Sep 1ember 4, 200 I Pag e JO • • - 10 do. They sai d he co ul d make an anonym o us report and th ey would ha ve so meone co me ou t to talk to the pe op le. He said he wanted to be ne ig hborly, so he went to ta lk to the pe ople to gi,·e them a chanc e. One of tho se perso ns actuall y respo nd ed favorably and that put an end to th e problem with that dog . Unfortunatel y. \\~th the other ne ig hb or. that did not happ en. One of our nei ghbors ac ruall y had three dog s. he said. and it was not the numb er that he was concerned with . When he as ked th e nei ghb or to do so methin g about the dog , he re spond ed wi th .. what do yo u wa nt me to do. shoot h1m·>" Mr. Zito said he fee ls very strongly that. to rai se th e limn to fou r. is a bad move on the city's pan . \\'hen peop le are neglect mg their dogs now , what will doubling that amou nt cause. he asked. He felt that I 70 ba rking dog repo rt s was low, bec au se mo st peo pl e do not ca ll in . because th ey do not want to confro nt thei r nei ghbor or do not want to cau se problems . Hav ing fo ur dogs in a yard is ove rcrowd in g. If one or two dog s are barking in a yard now, what are three or four goi ng to cause ·> To allow dog s to be unlea shed . he said. is co urtin g disaster. We ha ve skunk s and foxes in our ne ighborhood, he said. and he did not feel dogs shou ld be unleas hed beca use of th ose oth er animal s. '.\-Ir . Zi to rei 1era ted that he did no t think the numbers should be in crea se d at thi s time . Joe '.\le ue had sig ned to speak but said he would pass at thi s tim e. Ruth Steel. 341 6 South Ra ce Street , said she ha s lived in Co lorado and the Den ver area all of her hfe. and has Jived m Englewood for mo re than thiny of th ose yea rs. She read th e fo ll owing statement · "l en;oy liv mg in the City of Eng lewood , be cau se it sull ha s the capacity to govern it se lf and relate 10 iss ue al a humane leve l, to be re sponsive as well as re sponsibl e. Deservedly. Eng lewood is a city that ha s gamed recognition for its civ ic and cultural achie ve ments. But. as '.\fah atma Ga ndh i once said . the greatn es o f a pe ople can be measured by how it treats its animals. It is beca use I bel ieve that th e rnizen s of Engle" ood have a soc ial co nscie nce, the means and the capacity to ensure that its animals are tr eated intcll1 ge11t ly, and humanel y, that I come before yo u thi s evening. Fourteen month s ago, co ming home on a we ll -tra veled Englewood stree t. I was shocked to see a dog , totall y iso lated . chained to a po st at the sid e of a hou e. co werin g m the dirt by the si de of a tire under an automobile . Stunned by the appa rent nu se ry of th is animal , I drove around th e block to make sure of what 1 had se en . Because I tra vel thi s route fr equentl y. I che cked again on seve ral occ asions , hopm g to see so me sign of human kindne ss bein g bes towed on tlu s pathetic beast. Because none was in evidence. 1 contacted an animal re sc ue organi za ti on , whi ch told me that the y had alread y had many ca ll s about thi s same animal. Further. that since Engle wood Animal Control was alread y inv o h·ed , I needed to call them . Eng lewo od Anima l Co ntrol ha d also had man y call ab o ut the pli ght of this animal. Technicall y. howeve r, be cause the lett er of the Ja w was bei ng ful filled , animal co ntrol was unable to intervene without a change in the Jaw . All through the fier cely hot summer o f 2000 , and th e cruel winter which followed. the dog wa s chained to its iso lat ed. mi erab le. mudd y outpost. In fo urteen month s. at all times of th e da y and ni ght. 1 ha ve ne,er seen a human spending time with that lo nel y, vulnerable animal. Over time . I have learned that a grea t man y dogs m Englewood shar e his crue l fate . :vtan y muni ci palitie s throughout ou r nau on, includm g Den,er. ha ve o utlawed tetheri ng, or co ntmuou s cha inm g. In 1996. the United State s Department of Agriculture banned tetherin g or co ntmu ous chamm g as inh umane and da nge ro us to the confined dog and othe r ammal Be hevmg that no animal should be sub;ected to thi s kind of abuse. I feel that the se pracuces hould al so be ba 1med m Englewood . To th is end . I subsequenily took my concerns to the Co de Enfo rcement Adn ory ornnuttee . After ha ving met with th at body for man y month s, I found its members to be ouneous. pauent and w1 llm g to wrestle ,~th th e co mp eting interests of complex issue s that are brought to them. I ha ve also le arn ed that the ci tizens of Englewoo d are ex traordinarily well served by out stand ing Code Enforce ment Department o fficial s. Chi ef Bob :vt oo re and Code Enforcement Supervisor Dave Lynn are mte lhge nt , well-info rmed , eve n-hand ed . fair - mmded , knowledgeable public servants. They not only understand the law , but the y are also dedicated to protecting the nghts of all of Englewood 's c iti zens . whil e responding to the concerns of the community . I wa nt to take this opportunity to thank them for their access1 b1lity, their respons ive ness and their profe ss ionali sm, which help s to make thi s a plea ant pla e to hve . ln life, there is no co nstant but change . Eng lewood, for better or for worse , ts not exempt fro m the trade-offs ne cess itated by growth . Perhap s ns le ast-palatable aspect is the incrca smg nee d fo r the rule and regulauons which we all view as loss of individual freedom. Government did not create the se problems . By denying limit s to growth , we create d • I • 0 • • longle"ood Citv Cm nc1l September 4. 20Cl I Page 11 • • - them our,eh e, no" "e h,s e 10 pay th e piper. Some rules" h1ch go, em our ,onmmnll) and\\ Inch arc respon tblc !or keeping the peace " ill ha,·e robe redefined 10 do JU t that. gowm and keep the peoce In this tn5tJn('.e . tor thb eq~·nmg, ,,e are talking about common cnsc J.nJ pre\ent1,·e mt:::i~ure-s, ,,h1ch add.re the need of Jn enure .:ommum [). Detemunmg the number of pets per household 1; J suck> \\tcket. but reasonable In addrnon to co111pa monsh1p and so ializmg. ammab need adequate ,pa e m "hich to exe r ,se nd mo,e abou t free!) In a clly 111s often d1fficul1 10 pro, 1de them wnh th at pace . Cons,deratton fo r th e animals and the neighbor 1s cm, al to any dension about the numbers of pet we ha,e . Tethered ammals. and ammab co nfined to small. fenced ya ,d . be co me lonely. bored Jnd artx1ous when th ey are kli alo ne for protra ted periods of ume . It is my w1derstanding 1ha1 Englewood has the highe ,1 inci de nce of mail earner bne of any m11111c1pality m th1 area . TlllS 1s 1101 because the dog s are bad. it 1s becauS<' their c aretakers ha, e pla ced them m deprived. lonel y and vulnerable pos111on s. \\'hen 1he1r s pac e 1s 111, aM . the y feel threatened. They defend themselve s and their terntof). The Jokes a bout he rd 111g cat, arc ba,.·J more on fac t than on fi uon . ats like to do their 0\\11 thing . at home or abroad . \\'hen they are abroad. th e neighbors don·t hkc 11. I am a dog !o,cr. and a ca t lo\'er. but I ha\'e learned 10 be reahs11c about re pons1bil111es 1mplic1t 10 being the ca retaker. La" mu st be realt s tic. 100. Adopting a lea;h la\\ 111 an ever more cro"ded rny 1s essen11al 10 mam1a111111g health . safety and peace. \'1m1a ll y all of the surioumlmg mumc1pal111es ha\'e le ash law . It is regrettable that c hi ldren and their dog . e, en" hen perfec t!) uJmed. no longer run free in the parks . Cnforrunately. the e~ponent1 al gro "th of human populauon ha; elinunated man y op11on s whi h we once took for granted . Appropriate. humane. health) and protectl\·c care . hous ing and mamtenance o f pets . spe 1fically dogs and ats. hould be a no-brJ1ner. replete \\Ith obnous truth. C nfornmately. howe,·er. mall commumu e.. mcludmg Engle\\ood. there are people \\ho .ire ignorant of. or msens mve to, th eir anunal's needs. o r \\hO do not care enough about 1lwir amrnals to treJt them co mpa ss ionatel y and humanel y. There is an 1rrefu1ablc connection be ,een neglect o l Jnd cruelt) to ammals , and th e public interes t and the publi c afe ty. If all 111dl\ ,duals act<.>d out 01 a sen;e of pub!:· interest. ommon en se, compas 1011, good c 111Lensh 1p and mutual res p ect. regula11on, and code enforcement \\Ould 1101 be an is sue . It 1s a privilege 10 li ve m Engle\\OOd. It 1s a pri \'1lege 10 s hare our II\ e, '"th ompamon ammals All rights and all prmleges arc accompamed by re s pons1b1 h11c s It I our right and our pm 1le ge to ommumca1e with our pubhc ofiic1al s. It 1s our right and our pnv1!cge 10 par11c1pat e 111 the kg1slatl\ e prote s To thi s end, I re spectfully urge the adop11 on o t the code dtanges proposed b) the ode Enforcemem Act, tSOf) omnu11ee. '.\leanwhile. the \\Te tched ammal on Danmou1h, refe ncd to earlier. i, 1111 ,ha111ed to his nu erable. rnlnerable exlSlen c of endless neglect. 1sola 11 011 and loneliness. uch cruelty should not be tolerated m 1h1 s caring , progress I\ e conununny. It 1s my ho pe that. m the near furu1e. the [·ngle "ood Code Enforcement Advisory Conmunee \\Ill re ommend that C,ty Council outla" the ba rbJri -. inhuma ne, unne essary and intolerable prac11ce of fullume hammg. The compassionate trea tment of the ammals for" h1ch \\Ca re the gua rdians and caretakers ,hould re1kc1 that care . Humane treatment 1s the res pons 1b1li ty 1mpli ct1 to the pnv1lege of ha, mg ammals. \kam, h1le. as a conunumry. I belie ve that "e are capable of makmg these difficult, neces ary and important changes.'' She thanked Coun 11 for the coune y of their anennon. Jolm Grazuhs. -l-l 9 outh L111 col n Srreet. said he would not take a 101 ofCounc1l's 11me , obviously there are many peo ple here this evemng. He satd he did not want to gah amze the group one "ay o r the other . any more than the y already are . He stated that he somenmes \\Onder . ho "e' er, ,f "e a re deali ng with an ammal co ntrol issue or are we dealmg w11h a government issu e. Fom1er President Ronald Reagan used 10 sa y that the be t type o f govenunent I o ne 1ha1 unrudes the lea t . Ha, 111 g been the , ,cum of an amma l b1tt' severa l yea rs ago . he said . I can cenainly relate to those who are m fa,or ofa ,ery sm I le ash la" He felt tha t so me ,on of leash law should be enacted. He wondered , however. "hether Coun 1! B,11 :S:o . 36 1s 1ha1 la". It seems a bn resmcuve on th ose who are res ponsible, he said, and unrestncnve for those "ho are mespons1ble. Regardmg Coun c il Bill '.'lo . 37, he reiterated that the best type of government 1s o ne tha t mterfere the leas t. Kusnn Grazulis, 4489 South Lincoln Street, said she was present to talk about th e lea h law. ome o f her fn ends ha, e dogs that do not go to trainers, she said. but they train them themselves . She s ai d s he beltevc s I • 0 • • tl-• • • - Englewood it y Council September 4 . 200 I Page 12 they are very well trained . he presented a pet111ons \\1th name s of persons who would 1101 \\ant the leas h law passed. Mayor Bums said the petttto n would be made a pan of the record. Ms . Grazulis said she has won e\'eral ribbons with her dog. She said she would like to put her dog through agility , which has them complete ly off leash. where they go over jumps and through tunnels . She present ed a video of herse lf and her dog showin g its training . At the conclusion of the video. Ms . Grazulis said. fo r some of the responsible pet owners m Englewood. s he would like to have the opportunity to try her Llo g off leash . Kevin LaPrise, 2931 South Clarkson Street, said he. has li,·ed in Englewood for eight years , having 1110\'ed here from Denver. He said hi s neighbor acquired a number of dogs a coup le of years ago . This ha s ranged anywhere from two to ten dogs or more. be ca use the woman who was living wtth him wa s rai sin g Pomeranians. Pomeranians are a very umque dog, he said . They are very cute and loveab le. but 1f yo u ha ve ever heard their bark late at night. when yo u are trymg to s leep. it paints a \'ery memorabl e pi cture . They are not so cute to me anymore, he said . For about two yea rs , m y wife and I listened . he said . and there were times when you could not hear ten seconds go by without a dog barking m the nei ghb orh ood. He said his attempts to contact the neighbor were met wtth puzz leme nt and sa ying that the y \\·Oulu take care of it. Last year. the dogs were gone because the woman moved away. Tlus year. she is back ,n the neighborhood, not living at the house but the dogs are back. he said . When we heard the se dogs agam a tier two years of grinning and bearing it, he said, I decided to call the police thi s time and not remain anonymous. The police have been excellent, he said, and very re s ponsive, and Code Enforcement ha s been very helpful. The dogs do not get regular attention, and the smell of the dog fe ces is terrible at night when you are trying to sleep. Being woken up anywhere from I :00 a .m. to 5:00 a .m . with a dog barking 1s stretching me to the limit , he said. All it takes is about five seconds of loud barking and I am up , he said. The owner will whistle the dogs in and the barking stops, but meanwhile, I am awake . What these people do not realize is that the y are training the dogs to bark. reinforcing it. They bark at squirrels and peop le o n the other side of the fence . Mr. LaPrise said hi s neighbor now has to go to cour1 , and, whether he plead guilty or not guilty determines where he goes for the next round. In talking to Code Enforcement , I understand that what can happen is that the 0\\11er of the dog can either be slapped with a fine . probati on. and, if it happens again. another fine or probanon. '.\1r . LaPrise said there does not seem to be any teeth in code enforcement . He said the house he owns now is the biggest and most expensive house he ha s ev e r owned, and he is not rich by any means. He was reall y saddened to learn that his neighbor next door is the kind of neighbor that he is. because he does not care, and there are people in thi s community who do not have a clue about dogs They don't know how to raise them, train them or how to re spond to their neighbors. He said he hears more and more dogs barking with each passing month dunng the summer . He asked Council to please do something about that , and put the bite in the laws . He ur ged Counc il to plea se co nsider not raismg it to four dogs. There are too many people who do not understand how to rai se and take care of dogs, he said . As a side question, Mr. LaPrise asked if we are allowed to ha ve chickens in Englewood . Mayor Bums said not that he knows of. Mr. LaPrise said he asked that question, not to get a laugh. but because he has a nei ghbor across the way who has chickens. He said he spoke to Code Enforcement and was told that farrn animals are allowed . Mr. LaPrise said he has chickens and dogs in his neighborhood and asked Council to please do something. He said it would be good if Code Enforcement would conduct some mediation between neighbors . He said, in hi s case, his efTons to commumcate wtth his neighbor have been unsuccessful. and he was afraid to take a stand with the police, and is sull lookmg ovrr his shoulder, because you never know what people are gomg to do . He also suggested that if people arc cited for a noisy dog, that the y be asked to go to a dog tram mg seminar. The people that I live next door to. he satd. do not understand what it takes to keep a dog under control. He thanked Council for listenmg. .. I • 0 • • • En gle wood C ity Council September 4 , 200 I Page 13 ' . .. • • - ... Frank Martinez . 4600 South In ca Street. said he has known Council Member Bradshaw sin ce s he wa s a little tin y girl. He asked if we have a leash law or not. If we do, why don 't the y enforce it. and if we ha ve a dog catcher in town , what section does he go to ? We ne ver see him in our ne ighb orhood. he sa id . Everyone says we have dog cat chers , but I have ne ve r seen one . Do we ha ve them o r don 't we. he asked . My main complaint is people who let their dogs and cat s run loo se a ft er it gets dark . I live rig ht on th e comer and am real proud ofmy house , he said, but e,·ery day I hav e to go out with a hove l and clea n up the messes. and that is not right. Mr. Martinez said he is all fo r ha vi11 g dogs . but why le t them out at ni ght. We are old folks , he said , and we sleep nights and get up late . We are all retired m that nei ghb o rh ood . and we don ·1 like to have dogs running around and mess mg up o ur yards . I am re al pro ud o f my yard . he said . and I like to keep it nice. lfwe have a leash law , let 's enforce II. he asse rte d. and ifwe ha ve a dog cat cher. have him out in our neighborhood once in a while so we can see him and po mt o ut so me o f th o e dogs. because the y are not being controlled . Mayo r Burns called for Phillip Wanc zyk to s peak. He wa s to ld th e '.\I r. Wa nc zyk had a lready left. Katherine Fischbach. 4425 South Acoma Street. said she ha s lived at that address fo r O\'er fifty years. She said s he ha s a dog and likes dogs , but has been attacked about three tnnes m th e las t ye ar" hil e walk ing he r dog m th e park. It is pretty frightening , she said . Her dog stays o n a leas h and she fed s th ere s hould be a k ash la w. Regarding the number of dogs, she said she would giv e an ex ampl e he sai d she lik es her ne ighbors on the south and they have a nice dog , but the y kept another dog fo r three we eks thi s summe r. The mell wa s atrocious, she said. She asked if Counc il could imag me wha t II \\OUld be lik e ha vin g three or fo ur d0gs 111 a yard . She said she watched the mo vie that wa s JUSt hown and did not un ders tand th e ·01mect1 on betw een that and what we are talkmg about, whi ch 1s ho w man y dogs we s houl d ha\'C an d ab ut a leas h law . he said s he ha s taken her dog to trainmg . She said she 1s trained but th e dog 1s no t tr amed and he 1s reall y agamst havmg more than rwo dogs and wants a leash law and s he wants 11 enfo rced. Beve rl y Cumrnms . 304 8 outh Acoma treet. said she and her mother ha ve li ved at that addre fo r three )ear an d ha"e nei ghbors wh o ha,·e dogs . We had to call the police earl ier and complain because when "e complained to the neighbors. all the y said wa s dogs are supposed to bark . When th e ki ds are o ut . th e y are upp osed to bark. and 1fthey are m, the y are supposed to bark . She said her grandson call ed and sai d enough 1s eno ugh and the police did come out and take very good care of 11. S he said th e dogs 111! bark. ev ery once in awhile, es peciall y when the y are gone on holiday. She said the y lea ve the neighbo r 10 tak e care of th em which isn 't ve ry smart because they are still in the house barking all day long. Maybe th ey get out m the mo rning and at night , and that is it. Ms . Cununins stated that her concern is the abuse of th e nei ghbors, no t the do g s . She said we neighbors have to put up with this and it 1s abus ive to u . Al so, the cluldren around there are stepping in dog fece s in the yard, because people \\~II let their dogs go at mght and you don 't get out there fa st enough to pick it up before the children are out pla ymg . Al so , you are awakened, and you can 't get back to s leep . Ms . Cummins said there should be a law against pe ople ha "mg to put up with other people 's dogs . They don't hear it , they must not, they don 't c are if the y do and n ·s dangerous to the children al so. She noted there are eight dogs within a half block from her house to th e south . The children have chased the animals out into the street. and two of the animals have been ran over, she said . One of them wasn 't killed but the linle kitty was . She said the duplex next to here ha s a famil y of two. but there were four dogs and two c ats at one time . :-low they have at least gotten down to two dogs. but the in the next house. there is one great big Ranweiler and that dog barks constantly when the y let n out. She said it is not fair , because you can 't get back to sleep once the y wake you up . Ms . C umnuns said 1f it was up to her, they would have one of each and that would be it. Ms . Cummins thanked C ouncil and hoped the y would not let anymore in . She felt we have enough to worry about now. Rhonda Gramer, 3072 South Gilpin Street, stated she is a dog owner and ha s two small cluldren. M s . Gramer said s he hkes to go to the parks of Englewood and the open spaces and always takes her dog on a lea sh. She said she is very concerned about the safety of her children, herself and her dog . There hasn ·1 be en a time m recent memory when I ha ve gone to a park in Englewood, where I haven ·1 had dogs , that are • ) I • 0 • • • Englewood City Counci l September 4. 200 I Page 14 ·,. • • - not under reasonable control , run up to my dog, anack my dog, or almost knock my children over. she said . I've seen dogs urinate on the playground equipment and I'm very conce rned . What brought me here tonight is an incident that happened two weeks ago when I was walking in Packy Romans Park on a Monday, at 9 :30 in the morning, she said, and I had my dog on a lea sh. Fonunately, I did not have my children with me . There was a man there who had two dogs . They were not leashed, they were not under reasonable co ntrol and they ran up to my dog. Ms. Gramer said s he asked the man if he co uld reasonabl y control his dogs. He began to scream at me, she said. using profanity and ca llin g me name s. She said she was concerned for her safety. She requested that Council consi der the lea sh Jaw to make all of the ciuzens of Englewood safe again. Ms. Gramer thanked Council for their time . Kevin Gramer, 3072 South Gilpin Street, noted his address is actually in Dcm·er, four houses no nh of Englewood. Mr. Gramer stated he lives in Denver and works in Denver, down on Capital Hill adjacent to th e Governor's Mansion. at the Grant-Humphries Mansion. He said n 1s in the middle ofa park. o ne o f our beautiful parks in the Denver Metro area . Mr. Gramer stated tha t he and his wife go to Packy Romans Park. We call it mus hroom park bec ause it has mushroom helters . he said . We like to go there b~cause it's so close to our house, only a couple of blocks away. Every time we go there, he sa id. there are difficulties with other dog owners who do not keep the ir dogs on leas hes . \Ir. Gramer said he ha s a five year old and a three year old, whom they are very concerned about. because of their safe ty and because of th e animals that are running loose. He said when he goes to work at the Grant-Humphries \1ans ion , which is in the rruddle of Governor's Park. he doesn 't have to worry abo ut dogs running up to hi s chil dren. at lea st for the most pan. Sometimes people leave their d ogs off their leashes. but not very often. He said he has worked there for twelve years now and the si ruatio n 1s onl y gemng bener, becau e we 're concerned. He said it is more pleasurable to go to the Grant-Humphries Mansion and to Governor 's Park , which has a playground facility. than it is to go two blocks away to Packy Ro mans Park . He said he wished that both parks were equally safe, that there were leash laws in both commumtles, because we ha ve suc h beautiful parks in this area . He said if every dog was like the yo ung gul's dog that was here earlier, he wouldn't have a complaint tonight . He added everybody could haw theu dogs running everywhere or at the ir command, but that's j ust not the case. Lmda asc. 4999 South Shenman Street, said she called Arapahoe County six months ago a nd the y sa id you allow three dogs in the Ci ty of Englewood. She stated she doesn't care about the founh dog. we have three dogs. our German Shepherd, and two miniature Collies. They saved my sis ter one night from getting anacked in our house . lfwe didn't have those dogs, we could be dead, she assened, because I was in the kitchen . My nephew lived in the basement and he could be killed and nobody would ever know ifwe were Jailed . I'm happy we have our three dogs to protect us and that's all I have to say. C arl Kingsbury. 2865 South Acoma Street, said he grew up here , and hi s father worked for the City, but he 1s not an employee of the City. My neighbors have fifteen cats and two dogs. he said. I called Code Enforcement and I was told that I could trap the animals if they came on my propeny, he said. Well, I'm not a paid employee so I don't know why I should be responsible for enforcmg the City's codes . I took hi advice and did it anyway, he said, and took the cats down to the shelter by the Servicenter. They re leased the cat to the owner and told the owner that I trapped the animal. Now I have problems with my neighbors. thank you. He opined that all people should be limited to the number of cats and dogs they ha ve. He said he 's a d og ow11er. but ifwe are going to have codes and laws like these that yo u are considering, then we sho uld enforce them and the City employees should be responsible in enforcmg them. Mr . Kingsbury thanked Co un c il. Mary Hoeft , asked if she could say one more thing. Mayor Bums told her that we usuall y have o ne bne at the app le here and Ms. Hoeft said this is not for the record. She faced the audience and spoke to them briefl y regarding dogs at risk . Mayor Burns advised that the hearing could not be conducted this way . He thanked her and continu~d on with the hearing . • I • 0 • • -• Englewood City Counci l September 4 , 200 I Page 15 • • -' Irving Bennen. 4040 South In ca Street, stated that dog is man 's best fncnd and dog ·s best fnend 1s an othe r dog, so I've got two of them. He sa id th e problem with dogs is the fact that yo u are dealmg with nghts and so many times ordinances and laws have to do wi th whose rights shall prevail. hall we smoke o r not smoke , sha ll we put the Ten Commandments up or not ? He stated that the number of dog s or pets that should be a ll owed would depend on the neighbors, so, if it is offensive to the nei gh bors . ma ybe one dog coul d be too much and , if it"s not, maybe ten would be fine . Mr. Bennen said. 111 regard to bark mg. dogs are terri torial. He said none of his dogs stay out all day . I just take them out for a walk or to do their thmg . he said. Every dog that is outside will bark continually when somebody wa lks b y. He felt the problem was, why do people lea ve dogs o ut. If the y didn't leave th em out, you wouldn't have that problem. Maybe we o ught to have an ord inance saying let 's keep dogs in . He s tated one other point wnh regard to dogs . if th ey're o ut all the time and if yo u unders tand dogs are pack animals . th ey have no pack leader when the y are out and this is the biggest problem you have with dogs, no pack leader outside. The 0\\01er ,s the pack leader, and if he 's not around, yo u have a problem . Tern Wans . 4 338 South Ga lapago Street, said she and her husband came here tom ght becau e II sound s like we are one of the three people around here who don·1 have a problem wtth o ur dog, he doe 0 ·1 bark . She said he 1s a German Shon Hair and she takes him every sin gle da y to the greenbelt, which 1s below Radcliff a t the end of Galapago Street, and it runs reall y far to the eas t and we st. he lated he walks him th ere on a leash, and when the y ge t to the park . s he takes him off the leash and throw 1nm hi racquetball. Ms . Wans aid s he 1s concerned, when she hears so man y people sa y dogs are barkmg. E,·en though we give them all the love and a11ent1on the y need , a dog that doesn ·t run ,s gomg to be a neuroti c dog . She said her dog never barks . and he runs every da y fo r an hour m that park. sometm1e s for two hours . I Int the ball and he runs for as far as I can possibl y htt 11 . and he 1s exhausted when he comes home . She said I"ve been doing that the ye ar and a half that "e·ve lived here . She said he never ees a nother dog m the greenbe lt. It is JUSt us, every si ngle da y, she said. If people walk 111 and the y have children , I always take the ball and with a command I bring him right next to me so he won ·1 go there . She said she asks if they like dogs. and when they say yes, he just comes up and he does this httle shimmy. He's reall y lovmg and friendly to people . She stated that she would probably have to move if we get a leash law it.at says th ere is no public recrea ti on area . Also , she said . that is what bothers me about Co un ci l 8111 No . 36, because yo u say it ha s been proven that a voice command is inadequate. I hear all the concern s of th e people. but those ofus who know what dogs reall y need, kn ow that the y need exercise and not j ust in the ir ) ard. Ju st to walk a yo un g dog on a leash is not eno ugh exercise. It is good for an old dog, but thi s is a yo ung dog , he 's just barel y two . If you decide to ha ve a leash law, I hope there is some amendment to it to allow a public recreation area like Chatfield Re servo ir. It is a dog park and everybody can go and let th eir dogs off leash. Us uall y. people with aggressive dogs don "t go there, she said . Our dog has been anacked twice by bad dogs who are off leash. but I just quiver and fear whe n I think that there is not goi ng to be any public place I can walk to wnh my dog, so he ei ther ha s to be kept inside or just ma yard . lf we keep sa ymg that 's not good enough for dogs. she said, then there should be a public place m Englewood, or several, where dogs can be off leash. People who are afraid, who have bad dogs. or have children th at the y·re worried about. perhaps, will go to the other parks that are not dog parks . But to leave us with nothmg, is a disservice to the dogs and to the pet o"ners in the area , and it acrually wi ll mcrease bad behavior a nd lots of barking . Dean Glenn. 2704 South Delaware Street. felt that , more than barkmg dogs, even more than leashed or unl eashed dogs , the iss ues that conce rned him in the se proposed ordinances, dealt more wi th the ind ication that it was n 't th at the City Coun ci l wa nted to control its citizens, but to help and serve them. He said if we all look c lose ly at Co un ci l Bill No . 36, it rums all the se actions or offens es into pol ice actions , not animal co ntrol or code enforcement actions. He sta ted that every reference to animal control officers is removed . Mr. Glenn sai d it sounds like we have one area between 4400 and 4700 so uth and from Broadway to In ca that there is obvio usly a problem, and that seems to be where ten or twelve people, who ha ve spoke n tonigh t, live and that seems to be confmed to that neighborhood . He said tfwe ·re a ll co nc ern ed about th e animals, and anyone who owns pets is concerned about the welfare of the ir pet, then let 's show some conce rn by enforc ing c urrent laws and not getting the City more invol ved in en fo rceme nt iss ues that the y really sho uldn 't be involved in . I • 0 - • • • Eng lewoo d ity C ounc il Sept ember 4 , 200 I Pa ge 16 .. • • - Barbara Fout. 41 85 South Huron Street. said she would only take a few minutes of the Co un ci l's time. and thanked them for having this public hearing. She re cogni zed that Council did not have to go through this. and expressed apprec iation for being given the chance to g ive some input . She said she 1s a third generation citizen of Englewood, and is real impass ioned about Englewood. It is a fin e pla ce to live . and it is a fine place to rai se your famil y. Some of those famil y members include your o wn amma l :Vi s . Fo ut encouraged Council to focus on the problem, as it seems that we have enou gh rul e o n the books. l f"qu st o rgani ze the rules and enforce them, we don't need to create more leg is latio n. she ai d . l e t · add ress those is sues that are in violation, including improper care . abuse and neg lec t o f any animal anywhere \\ithin the ctty li1111ts . let's not mandate proper care by those ofus that are alread y do mg p ro per car e . Plea se co nsider lening Englewood residents govern ourselves . as I belteve we are capab le o f do mg. s he sai d . Do not create more government. just enforce it more effecttvel y. Leroy DaVault, 3291 South Emerson Street. s a id he ha ltn,d m Engle "ood for s1xri yea r . I le did no t fc ·I It was a maner of how many dogs you had . but how yo u take care of yo ur dogs. that co un ts . He aid he had a dog that got cancer about three years ago and pent almos t fo ur tho u and dollar · o n that dog. He tJt cd the dog is still alive. Mr. DaVault favo rs raising the limit to four dogs. The d ogs yo u ha,·e shou ld be tak~n care of, that is where the problems are . it is the 0 \\11 er no t the dogs. he sai d . Jackie White, 10 7 1 West Oxford Place , referred to the En g lewood mzen and b egan w11h num be r one. which discusses the amount of dog . Sh e aid he has two and ha ne ver had an y mo re than that. he described herself as a responsible pet 0 \\11er and. 1f he chose to hJ\·e mo re. she would like to ha ve the ability to do that. She said she favored the hi g her limit of four. As far as the cruelty to animals. 11 so un ds like we need Code Enforcement to be able to do their JOb . There have been complaints in my area m the past where I did call on a dog, she said. becau e it was not fenced . It came over and anacked my dogs . which were on a leash. She said they wouldn't do anything about it. and we need to give them th e po wer to do something. Because of the cruelty to animal , let 's fine the owners. or do whateve r we need to do. suc h as take the dog awa y from them, and let them be adopted by omebody that does lo ve them. Re gardmg the leash law, Ms. White said her dog are usuall y on a leash when she walks them. They have been through obedience training, but still c annot be trusted when they see another dog that the y are intere sted m. o r a squirrel, or whatever. She lated they're gomg to take o ff. for the most pan, so she keeps her d ogs on a leash . However, if we are going to have a srrtct leash law. I agree wtth the lad y who was up here before , she said, who stated that we do need to ha,·e somewhere m Englewood that we can take our dogs m a fenced area where they can run. She said he reall y did not want to dnve clear out to Chatfield to do that o r down into Denver. She said that 1s something that needs to be taken into consideration. With re gard to licensing, Ms. White said that, if you have responsible pet owners the y are going to license their pets , so she did not think we need another law on that. Donna Johnson, 3145 South Cherokee Street . addressed the number of do gs permined. We could have an encyclopedia full of laws and ordinances regarding animals , she said. and there are always go ing to be some owners who are cruel to their ammals, but most ofus are responsible . She said that. because o f so me o f the stories in the papers, especially the woman who was beaten in l inleton, s he has been thtnkmg abo ut gemng a third dog. She said that was her decision to make and did not feel it was up to the gove111111ent to decide whether or not she could have a third animal. She said she specifically listened to the chairman of the Code Enforcement Advisory Comminee, who stated that maybe we should have a grandfather c lause , staring a specific date to get rid of the third dog. She asked what date and which one of her animals to g et nd of. She stated she is strongly in favor of four animals per household . Ms. Johnson stated that she ha s listened to other citizens complaining about barking dogs . That has nothing to do wtth the amount of animals per household. She said there is an ordinance out there that could be enforced by C ode Enforcement. Ms. Johnson addressed cruelty to animals , where it menuons shelter, and water containers . She asked if the Code Enforcement Advisory Comminee was gomg to patrol that. She said the y would have to add definite staff mg in order to enforce that . You are always gomg to have that handful that are cruel to ammals. and don't give their animals water. she said, so I think that, unless we want to get our • • I • 0 • • -• Englewood City Council September 4 , 200 1 Page 17 ' . .. • - taxes raised. maybe we should no t e ve n consider that. She stated the next iss ue is anima ls on a leash . l\l s . Johnson said she does no t drive, but does a lot of walking in Englewood . She said she ha s never been approached b y a dog at large. S he o p ined that 90°'o of dogs at large are out bec ause they got out of the yard and the O\\ner does not know any1hm g about 1t. About a m onth ago, she said , m y handy man let my dog o ut. H e was gone approxi mately sixteen h ours a nd got hit b y a ca r and a lmos t died. She fe lt that all she would have needed wa s Code Enforcement 10 come and knock o n her door and let her know she wa m violati o n . Res po nsib le dog owners will put their dog on a leash. she sa id. and sh e felt animals should be on a lea sh in a park . he did not think it was that much of an issue and was definite ly opposed to it. Finall y. she addressed th e li ccns mg issue. She stated she has two dogs and one cat, and all of her animals are licensed . Unforrunately, when the fi rst of th e year hits. we a ll come up with the same conclus to n that we have to li cense our animals. Ho we,·er, sometimes medication or othe r c ritic al expenses come up and eventuall y we "~II get our pet li c en ed. he said a ga in . she did not feel th at it is up to the Ciry to tell her when she s hould lice n e her dog . Lin Tiffany. 41 90 outh Huron treet. stated that she is an animal Jove r and has dogs that she Jo,·e s very dearl y. She sai d s he has Dalmanans and works with the Dalmatian Resc ue Lea gue. she foste rs dogs. and helps place them llie dogs are all adopted dogs, o ne of them is deaf, and a car htt o ne o f them. She said a fa mil y kept o ne of them in the clo et a nd had him on drugs. l ftt were n o t fo r me . who knows where th ese dogs would be, mo re than likel y the y would have been destroyed . Beyond that. she satd. I"ve heard a lo t of talk a bo ut the irre sponsibl e c iti zens . I am a responsible citizen a nd I am fo rrunate enough to ha,·e a large home and a large yard . She s aid her dogs are m the yard, inside at ni ght, ha ve lo ts of room to ru n and the y d o n 't bark. S he said she asks her nei ghbors if he r dogs are bothering them, because she wants to be a good ne ighbo r. I also walk my d ogs almost every da y and I always carry a baggy wtth me. she sa id, and I am proud o f the fact that I am able to take care of these dogs. She fe lt she ho u ld not be J11ruted 111 the number of dogs because, if she needs to fo ster dogs o r care fo r o nes that are abused, she would ltke to ha ve that opporrunity . The issue at hand is irrespons ible dog owners, those that let their dogs bark at night. and those that do n ·1 keep them contro lled on a leash . She said the issue is not those that are respons ible O\\ners, tt 1 thos~ that don 't kn ow how to care fo r th eir dogs . She asked Counc il to address the underlym g proble m. n ot j u st the symptom. Puni sh th e abusers no t the true lovers and caretakers of animals, s he conclud ed. Jud y Wallace, 530 Eas t Amherst Avenue , stated she has Jived in Englewood for thineen years he a ,d she suppons having a leash Jaw as pan of the Englewood C ity Code. She said she O\\TI two neutered Sluatsu dogs. o ne mal e and o ne female . She stated that o n October 15, 1995. her male dog wa s anacked by an unleashed German S hepherd in Bates-Logan Park. Later that evening. it was appare nt that he was under extreme stress, so she took him to the Centra l Animal Veterinary Emergenc y Hospnal. he said he was treated for trauma and a la ceration to his leg . The next day he was taken to her regular vet fo r a fo ll ow up ,·1s1t. and she detemuned tha t he was still in s hock. He had not eaten o r drank anything fo r over twenty- fou r hours and he was havmg pain in his nec k . She said he was shakmg so badly that the ve t sat o n the fl oor wi th him to perform the exam . Ms. Wallac e said the vet ordered presc ription dog food that had to be hand fed to him so that he wouldn ·1 ge t dehydrated. Two days later she c he cked h im a gain a nd deterrnmed he was still havi ng pam in his neck. The dog would n ot go into that park for over two mo nths after tha t attack a nd to this day he is still frightened when another dog approaches him. M s. Wa ll ace stated, when the anack occurred, a n Englewood police officer "~messed it and gave the owner a ti c ket for havi ng her dog off leash. At that time , there was a sta tement in the Parks and Rec reation Department 's brochure that, animals in parks must be on a leash , and the s igns entering the parks also had that wording . She said the non-e mergency police department told her that she should call them an)~ime she wanted an officer to come to the park, and the y would do the san1e thing . The last time it happened, the police offic er approached th e five owners who were lening their dogs run freely . They c hallenged the police officer on the quote, sayi ng that they had contacted Code Enforcement and they were told that there was no such thing. It d id turn o ut that there was no longer anything wnnen down in their brochure. The signs have been c hanged a nd the brochure now reads animals in parks must be in reasonable control. The next day, Ms . Wallace contacted Code Enforcement and learned that this brochure actually is something that Parks and Recreati o n puts o ut. and doesn ·1 really have anything to do with C ode Enforcement that the City can e nforce . When she as ked • ) I • 0 • • • Englewood City Council September 4, 200 I Page I ·,· • • - the police officer what her options were. he said she had none , and tf he was afraid to come to the park. she should just stay out of it. Ms . Wallace feels that reasonable control is open to too much interpreta ti on by the animal owner, and is ineffective at the least and dan gero us at the most. She said her dogs are about the size of a small baby. and wondered how you can be sure your dog will know the difference the next ume a small baby is crawling on the ground . She said, in research ing thi s topic . she came up with hundreds of communities that have an enforced leash law. If yo u read the DenYer Pos t today. you saw the li st of our surrounding communities that have leash laws . The Amencan Arumal Ho p1tal As oc1ation state s in their article that a community approach to dog bite prevention allow that ammal control officers should be able to enforce leash laws . She also said The American Kennel Cl ub endor es leash laws . She stat ed that , in one anicle she read. the officer took the soft approach and earned mexpensl\·e leashes wuh him and he approached the owners with that as a fir st warnin g . !'vi s. Wallace 1s 111 agree ment with the people who want a dog park . She feels there are many rea sons to keep yo ur dog on a leash ,, hen It 1s not on your own property, for the safety of your o,m dog and an y oth er dog 1t ma y encounter. for the safety of other pe op le and for the safety of wild life such as when dogs c hase squirrel s and rJbbn . She said she ,, as not saymg that yo ung girl shouldn ·1 have a place to train her dog for show or that th e o,,11er of a Gernian hepherd shouldn 't have a place to let their dog run. but there are se veral big dog park s m th e metro area for that purpose . She sa id one is as close as Washington Park, and it has Do ggy Bea c h Da y at specified time s. Ms. Wallace felt that her taxes hould go for the greater good for the community and its people . If I am afraid to enter a park because there are loose dogs then m y rights as a citizen are being denied because l 'm be111g denied acce to th e very parks that l have paid for , she said . In concl usio n, Ms. Wallace ur ge d th e C ity of Englewood to pa s a leash law to ensure that the City code would be amended to include that law. to all o,, the enforce ment o ffi cers and the Code Enforcement o ffice to enforce the law . and to work on des1gnaung one of the man y parks in our community as a dog park . She expressed appreciation for all of the stat ement s fro m people who are against the se things because they are responsible dog owners. It is li ke the people who go to therapy are not the people who need to go to therapy, just as the people that are here toni ght are not the people who need to be here tonight . The people that are here tonight are responsible dog owners and wh1 he\'er wa y the y feel about this . I appreciate their being here . she said . Janet Wallace . 530 Ea t Amherst Avenue , voiced her supp on for the leash law in Englewood . he said sh~ has two small dogs , which are walked almost every da y. and the y are on a leash . She said. when she goes to the park , and sees dogs that are off lea sh. she prays , not only fo r her dog s, but she i al so afraid for hersel f. We have all read about dog s anackmg, and sometimes killing , small children. Cons1denn g the number of other city. county , state and federal parks that ha,·e lea sh laws. 1t eems reasonabl e and prudent for Englewood to ha ve a leash law , not only to protect our pets , but to prote ct our children . \'1ayor Bums ca lled the names of Maybelle Goetz, Manha Warren, Vic Pankosk.J , Agnes Pankosk.J. \'1a ry Secor. and Mike Hoeft , all of whom had already left. Jeanne Mc\Villiams, 3795 South Grant Street, said she was really glad to see the dog situation bei ng addressed. If you've listened to these people. yo u know there are a lot of pans to this . She satd she first wanted to talk about the number of dogs . In no way do we need to allow more dogs per household. she opined . Englewood has small lots . and if yo u figure four dogs for a small lot . that is just reall y pu shin g the envelope . She said she was very involved with a political campaign last fall , and the district we nt from Broadwa y to Cherry Creek Reservoir. and from Old Hampden to Arapahoe Road . She said she and her gro up walked the entire district, and she was primarily working Englewood . By far , Englewood was the most difficult area to walk because of dogs at large , she stressed . She said she saw fanulies that had ove r five dogs in the yard. We co uld not approach doors because the dogs were coming off the porch, and we were all m agreement that Englewood had the most difficult situation with dogs. and too many of them . Dogs make messes, and the rule says it has to be cleaned up within twenty-four hours . Four dogs, within twenty-four hours . could get pretty mess y, she said. She agreed with Mr. Roth about the leash law. Very few arumals are trained well enough to be under voice control. That youn g girl obviously spent a lot of time with her dog , but most people run home from work and the y are out the door, there is no trainin g. Additionally, 1 do a lot of walking in the greenbelt by Linle Dry Creek, and other parks , and tf l se e a dog • I • 0 • • Englewood City Council September 4, 200 I Page 19 • • • out in the middle of the field, l do not know whether it is under mice control. when he is on one end of the field, headed towards me , and the dog owner is clear across the field . I can 't even tell if the dog can hear the owner, so it is fright.ening . Also. we need to think about the fact that the codes need to be enforced. Ms . Mc Williams said her famil y ha s a yo ung cousin who is developmentally handicapped, ha s cerebral palsy, and the dog next door became very threat.ening . Every time he tried to leave his ho me and get into the car, and he is very mobily challenged, this dog would come into hi s yard and threaten him. When hi s mother called Code Enforcement. he could not do a thing about the neighbor, but told her she needed to trim her bushes . We need the leash law enforced, she said, and it needs to be enforced everywhere. Another thing she said she was worried about is that there are dogs on their own front lawn. When you are walking down the street. they come off their yard on to the public street. after you. She asked if the ordinance addressed this . She allowed that it is not a public park, but they do get into the public street and she said she would like to see that addressed. We need to also address barking dogs. which mo st people have already spoken about. We have more dogs in our neighborhood than we have people, they bark all night long, and she said she would not get up in the middle of the night and call the police about 11. It is not an emergency, and she did not feel like bothering the police, and you cenainly do not want to fight wnh th e neighbors . It really is something that needs to be finnly addressed, she said. There are rul es o n the books about removal of dog excrement, but it simply is not enforced now . She felt there should be more teeth 111 the laws, and really make it enforceable. It is posted at the parks that you need to pick it up , but 1t 1s o bad at the greenbelt over behind the high school, she said, that 1 can not allow my nieces and nephew to roll down the hill . It says that it must he picked up within twenty-four hours on private propeny, but \\hat 1f II is your private property, but it is your neighbor's dog . She said she uses the s hovel before she mows th e lawn, and she doesn't even own a dog. She said those are some of the things she would hke to ce happen. and she was really glad to see this situation being addressed. Errol Nixon, 1552 East Girard Place, said he was going to be brief because of the mtelhge nce of all o f the speakers that we have had tonight. He said he knows they are intelligent , because the y hav e expressed a lo t oflus views . It ts unfortunate that so many irresponsible people have forced this upon u , but goverrunent is a maner of compromise , and he felt that every household should have at leas t one dog and one cat. ! le said he would compromise and go along with this two dogs and/or two cats s1tuat1on . He sa id hi s oncem is that he takes his grandchildren to the parks, and unfortunately finds situations where there 1s animal excrement on the grass and m the playgrounds. He said he finds that the least responsible people are the people 141th multiple animals , unable to control them and unwilling to pick up after their animals . He felt the people who were the most irresponsible were the ones who had the ego to have a number of animals. but not the responsibility to take care of them. That is why l feel we are doing the right thing tonight. he concluded. Ma yor Burns called the name of Mary McCue. She was not present. Jennifer McKeman, 4353 South Lincoln Street, she said she suppons everything m Council Bill No . 36, for all the reasons we have heard tonight . She felt that Council Bill No. 37 should reflect a total of four pets, whether it be dogs or cats . It could be two dogs and two cats, or it could be three dogs and one cat. We have had lots of exan,ples tonight of people with fifteen cats, five or ten dogs, but irresponsible people are going to he irresponsible, they don't care what the law is. Those of us with our pets, can take care of four animals, she said. Mayor Burns called the name of Joe Jostes. He was not present. Linda Han, 4352 South Pennsylvania Street, said she has shown dogs for twenty-five years , has taught classes in the Englewood/Linleton area for South Suburban Parks and Recreation for five years . and has taught for fifteen years altogether. She said she has champion dogs, she trains dogs, and she shows dogs in obedience and confirmation. She said she found out about all this just this morning, so she has been doing some research . She said she has also worked as an animal officer and cruelty officer in the past, and has worked with the cities of Littleton and Denver, and on a state level with their legislation. She said she also • ) I • 0 - e r • • Englewood Cny ouncli eptember 4 , 2001 Page 20 • • - helped Denver with their bark111g dog laws . Re spon ible 0\\11er s are re pons1 b le 0\\1ier s. she said, whether yo u have one dog or whether yo u have four dogs . You clean up after yo ur dog . yo u make sure th ey don't bark. yo u make sure yo ur neighbors are happy with you. and yo u make ure the neighbor knows how to contact you \\~th problems, and you get the prob lem re olved . Tiiat 1s \\hat I have done. she said. and I have had happy neighbors . You have ordinances to co,·er barkmg and loo se dog , she stated . Educanon programs are imponant. she said. and I ,~II offer a linle bit o f a solution that was offered a few ye ars ag o, but fell along the way . You have a lot of dog show people m the community and have a lot of expenise 111 the Englewood/Linleton area . We love Linleton and Englewood . becau e you have good animal co ntrol people and yo u have a good city to live in ,~th animals . TI1ese people \\Ould be willing to help put together an education program that , if someone gets a ncket for a barkmg dog o r whatever th e offense is. these people would ha ve to attend a class and be required to go through that as pan of their penal ty . That ha s been shown across the country to be very effective m re olving problems . \1 s. Han said she ha s called animal control on barking dogs, and has al so knocked on people's doors at four o·clock in the mornin g because their dog was barking. If you educate people. it does help . she stressed . If yo u iss ue tliem a 11 ket. the y pay the fine and the problem contmues. You take them to the classes and educa te them. thi s 1s th e \\J ) to stop a dog from barkmg . You fir t find o ut wh y the dog is barking -1s II lonely. ha s it been left out m the ya rd ,~thout food and water" Find out the problem. th en yo u teach them how to teach the dog 110 1 to bark. It has been very succes sful. and I have all the matenals at home . If someone, suc h as ammal control. is willing to work with me. "C can set up ome kmd of a cla s to re so lve some of these problems . she sa1J . and I think it would help a lot. 1-favmg small do gs. I raise silky temers. which are about ten or twe lv e pounds. I have a problem with dogs loose m park s off the leash . They can be dangerous and I worry about my dog being anacked by someone 's dog that 1s no t well mannered . Al so. if I want to tram my dog 111 obedience, I need to take m y dog out to a park. se t up my Jumps and be able to work my dog off lea sh. She said she would like to see some wa y ofpunmg thi s m th e law. that if so meone was active ly work.m g a d og on obedience activities , they would be allowed to have the dog off leash . If you pa ss a stron ger lea h Jaw . she said she would like to see the City put together a plan to ha,·e a dog park . There are a lot of tho se across the country, there are a lot of good plans that can be brought together from AKC and other associations on how to put a dog park together that works . Hanng every dog that is able to go to the dog park ha\'e a canine good citizen cenificate on them. which means they ha ve basic manners, "i ll help . The lady that wants to be able 10 go out and throw a ball o he can retnew it , so me dogs need that acnv1 ty . She said she ha s small dogs that can run around her living room and get their exercise, but a big dog can not. so that need s to be dealt with . The responsible owner should not have to suffer because of the 1.rre spons1ble ones. but the responsible ones also have a responsibility to help the City and the community to resolve the problems. so that is what I would like to offer, she said . \1ayor Bum called the name of\1ike Thompson. He was not present . Gail Blank . who preferred not to giver her address , said she recentl y moved back home to Englewood after livmg out of state . She said she is very happy 10 be home, but is concerned that everyone is so worried about the dog issues and the leash Jaws. She said this 10"11 was beaunful when she left. She said he has dreamed for years about coming home, because Englewood was home and was a beautiful town . Kow. he said she could ride around and see ten to fifteen junked cars in ya rds. houses where there are drug deals or somethmg going on and run down neighborhoods . She said she walks down alleys that she used to pla y m when she was a hnle girl, and the y are so full of trash that she ca n 't even walk down them. And we arc womed about how man y dogs we 've got? Yeah, I brought some dogs with me. she said, and I am responsible . I have a doctor degree , I have a good job. and I will be a good Englewood ci nzen, she said, but can we make Englewood the city that I left , instead of worrying about some of these linle issues. Let 's clean up this town, she assened, and make it the town I left . Cmd y Scon, 3063 South Fox Street, said a world where dogs could not run off leash is a world she would not want to live in . It 1s imponant to a lot of people and a lot of dogs . She said she was surpnsed to see the wording of the Englewood leash law . It is actually very generous to just say reasonable control. She suggested that it be reworded to specify the details of voice control, because many dogs are under perfect ) I • 0 - • • Englewood City Counc il September 4 , 200 I Page 21 .•. • ... • - control and totally focused on the activity at hand. and 1t would be a disservice to make that illegal. She also said she would li ke to see the number of allowed animals increased . She sa id she has talked to people who ha ve too man y animals in their home. and the y are afraid because it is very imponant to them. Someone wnh three dogs is go mg to have a tendenc y to keep some of them hidden. but that is not good for the dogs and it is not good for the people to be afraid . Many of tho se dogs are not a problem to anyone . she concluded. Kathi Moore. 3265 South Ra ce Street, said she is the proud and lo yal owner of two beautiful and loving golden retrievers. She said she has been blessed and privileged enough to have been loved by them fo r over seven years . Because of the le sso ns they continue to teach me every da y, she said. I hav e begun to consider raising assistance dogs for ph ys icall y challenged indi vidual s . To do thi s, my duty would be to raise them for the fir st twelve to eighteen month s of their Jive s. and after that. the y anend funher educauon and hopefull y graduate as an assistance dog . I would like my onl y c hallenge in accomphslung this endeavor to be whether my hean can handle the separation from omethmg I ha ve rJI ed and gro \\11 to love, but not becau se I have alread y hn the III1ll t. he explained. If the hmn of two dogs 1s kep t. I will not be able to help give so me one who need the dog as more than just a fne ndl y companion. the ab1hl) to h ,·e life more productively and to expenence the les sons and love assistance dogs c an give . Mayor Burns asked if there was an yo ne el se who "~s hed to s pea k. There "as no one . COUNC IL MEMBER GARRETf MO\'ED. AND IT WAS ECOSDED. TO CLOSE THE Pl.."BLI C HEARING . Ayes: Council '.\,!ember :--abholz. Garrett , Bradshaw . \\'olo yn Yurchick, Grazulis. Bums Nays: :-lone The motion carried and the Publi c Heanng clo ed. [Clerk's note: The following persons s ubrruned leners, vo ice mail me sa ges and memorandums for Council's consideration at the pubhc hearing : David F. Weber. C.J . C ullman, Darlene Slyter. Sue Vo ll e. Charles Wlute , Jodie Johnson. D"ight and Jan Fitzgerald, C md y Scon, Lm Tiffany, Karen Pil gri m. Caitlin Cyboron, Kayley Cra bdree. Pnsc1 lla Wolford. Tracy Curry, Lmda Buckley, Rene e Leth, The Colemans, Janeen Wnght, and an unsigned e-mail mes sage from Thfesq@'aol.com] 10 . Consent Age nda COUSC lL MEMBER GARRETT MOVED, AND IT WAS SEC O ~DED, TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 10 (a) (i) AND (ii), 10 (b) (I) A-'1 D (ii), A,'1D 10 (c) (i). (a) Approval of Ordinances on First Reading (i) COU 'CIL BILL NO. 56, [NTRODUCED BY COU1'CIL MEMBER GARRETT A BILL FOR AN ORDrNANCE AUTHORIZrNG AN [NTERGOVE R.."NENTAL AGREEMENT ENTITLED ··CONTRACT AGREEMENT FOR !1'TOXJL YZER 5000EN PLACEMENT" BETWE EN THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEAL TH AND E V[RONMENT, LABORATORY AND RAD!A TIO SERVlCES DIVlSION AND THE CITY OF E1'GLEWOOD . (ii) COUNCIL BILL NO. 57 , INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER GARRETT • I • 0 • • • Englewood City Council September 4 , 200 I Page 22 ,....-- • .. • • • ' A BILL FOR AN ORDrNANCE ACCEPTrNG THE DEDI CA TIO N OF A RIGHT-OF -WA Y LO CATE D AT THE rNTERSECTION OF BAKER A VEKUE AND T EJON STREET IN THE C ITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLOR.ADO . (b) Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading (i) ORDf:'iANCE NO . 50, SERIES OF 2001 (COUNCIL BILL NO . 54 . INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER GARRETT) AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF A $7.500 GR.ANT FROM THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS (DOLA) FOR ENTER.PRISE ZONE MAR.KETrNG AND ADMINISTR.A TION . (ii) INTROD UC ED BY CO ORDINANCE NO. 51. SERIES OF 200 1 (COU)ICIL BILL NO . 55, 'CIL MEMBER WOLOSYN) AN ORDrNANCE AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY K:'-lOWN AS THE FOR.\IER CITY HALL FR.OM THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO TO THE El\GLEWOOD ENVfR.ONMENTAL FOUNDATION . (c) Resolutions and Mouons (i) AN ENG!NEERING CONTRA CT FOR Tl-I E FIRST PHA SE OF ,\:,.; IN FIL TR.A TION/TNFLOW STUDY FOR THE WA STEW ATER CO LLECTION TR.IB UTAR Y \V IT I I CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE IN THE AMOUNT OF $99,529.00. Vote results: Ayes : Nays: The motion carried . I I . Regular Agenda Council Members Nabholz. Garren. Bradshaw, Wo losyn Yurchick, Grazulis , Bums None (a) Approval of Ordinances on First Reading There were no additional ordinances subrnined for approval on first read ing. (S ee Agenda Item IO - Consent Agenda.) (b) Approval of Ordinances on Second Reading (i) and (ii) COUNCIL MEMBER WOLOSYN MOVED, A.'ID IT WAS SECONDED, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 11 (b) (i) -COUNCIL BILL NO. 36. Council Member Garren stated that he would like to defer any decisions on this until a Study Session could be held to discuss a lot of the input tonight. He said that sigruficant ponions ofth1s need to be discussed before he would be able to vote on this . Mayor Burns asked if that penains to both ordinances. Mr. Garren responded affirmativel y. Ma yor Bums agreed, stanng that there has been a lot of input tonight and some very good suggestions on some other steps we can take. We had a considerable offer from Linda Han to stan an educational program, which Ma yo r Bums satd he appreciate s very much. Obviously. she ts a lad y who has a lot of experience in thi s area , he said. • I • 0 • • • Eng le wood Ci ty Coun c il eptember -l . 200 1 Pa ger . '·. • • -.. ouncll :vl e mber Brad ·haw aid sh e would hke 10 remand thi s back 10 the Co de En fo rce ment Ad v, ory Commmee 10 con 1der the barking iss ue. the education issue , and to reword the leas h law . T hat 1s JUSI a tho ught. she said . because tho se are the three areas that I picked up , fr om the publi c hearing, that we n~ed to focu on . \1ayor Bums fell it would be very valuable to have staff collect the infomiauon received tom gh1. and perhap s put it ma form where we can re,·1ew it. Then. ifwe want to refer some ofit bac k to ode Enforcement. it might be a constructive thing to do. Or pi c k out a few things, we had a 101 o f co mmc111 s 10 111gh1 on barki ng dogs . Ms . Bradshaw said yes. that wa s on just ab out e ve ryone·s li st. he said she ha d a bad dog once .1ha1 bark ed. and he barked because the nei ghb or was lean mg o,·e r the fen ce tryin g to get a re co rdin g o f th e dog barking, so we cou ld go to court. She said s he ha s mce moved fro m that ne ig hb o rh ood. an d he 1s much happier where she is . She said he and her dog ha ,·e a re cord here m th e C 11 y of Engle \\OOd fo r ba rkin g . Ju st th e dog, she said . That is a hu ge con ce rn . and that 1s prob ab ly th e fi rst JS sue that peo pl e talk abo ut "11h dogs , s he said . Coun cil Member Grazu li s said that can al o be part of the edu an o n. because the re ar e mva s 1ve and no n- invas ive wa ys of controlling barking. Perhaps e veryone should be e du cat ed o n that . she said . Council Member Wolosyn said, regarding Coun c il \!ember Drad s haw · ugg esu o n. she pre fe rred 10 ha n· a discussion at Study Session. and then ma~be nuke a li st o f1hm gs . Panicula rly abo u11he barkmg do gs. and begin th e discussion and let Code Enfo rcement come ba ck and commem on 11. Council Member Dradshaw suggested havmg the joint Study Sess ion on Oc tober •• COUNCIL '.\!EMBER GARRETT '.\10V ED, AND IT WAS SECO~DED. TO CO~Tl'.'<t:E AGENDA ITEMS 11 (b) (i) AND (ii) -COU'.'<CIL BILLS ~O. 36 A .. 'iD 37 -TO THE REGt:LAR C ITY CO NCIL MEETl~G OF OCTOBER 15. 2001. Ayes : Nays : The motion carried . Council Members Nabhol z. Garrett. Brad shaw. Wolosyn Yurch,ck, Grazulis . Bums :-lone (iii) Ken Ros s, Director of Public Works. addressed Council !3111 ~o . 53 , vacaun g J pomon of the righ t-o f-wa y located in the 2-100 block of South Pe co s Street. H~ s tated that , back m 1997 . City Council approved a reso lution authorizi ng the vacatJon of the nght-of-wa y on Pecos Street. between Wesle y Avenue and Ha rvard Avenue . Unfortunatel y, when tha t happened. it wa s sem over 10 the coumy, and the county took this re solut io n authorizing the vacation as an o rdina nce 10 vaca te . The y changed their maps and sem a notice to the property owne rs that this right-of-wa y had been vacated . Mr. Ross said he ca me to the City in 1999 and tried 10 work this out \\~th the two property owne rs , in order to address the three condinons that Coun ci l had nude m 199 7, and we ha ve worked it out. The property o wner to the south was very cooperati ve , although the property owner to the north was not very coo perative , he said . We have. basically, provided a turnaround that satis fies the needs of the Fire Division. We took the tr largest ladder truck out there and had them pull in and back out and get out of there , whi ch establi shed the minimum amount of area requ ired for that turnaround. We posted it. and. in fact. because the property owner to the north was not very cooperative, we actually used city fo rces to install asphalt and demarcate that area, and then we posted it with no parking signs. he explained . So we have worked Jt out wi th both property owners, and, although the y arc not full cul-de-sacs, we believe that. wi th those no parkmg signs and with eoforcemcot from our Code Enforcement Officers. the integnty of those two turnarounds can be provided. In fact, last week, or the week before, fourteen velucles were towed because they were • I • 0 • • • Eng lewood City Council September 4. 200 I Pa ge 2-1 ... .. • • -' nnproperl y parked m that turnaround area. blocking acce s to the fir e hydrant . That action probably cost that bus ines close to S 1.000.00. Mr. Ross said he was happy to report. when he went out th ere la st wee k. 11 had been a whole \\eek. and the person was still respecting that turnaround. o it s howed that he ma y han: gonen the mes age. tafT is recommending that Council approve the ordi nance to va cate th e "est tlilil)' feet of the nght-of-wa y on Pecos Street between those two streets. he asse rted . Co un cil '.\1emb er Brad shaw thanked Director Ros s for answering Council's concern s and fo r go ing ou t there agam . Direct or Ros op111ed that \\ e are gomg to have to stay on top of it , but he felt it would work . ORDl'NA1'CE :--o. 2. ERJE OF 2001 (COUNCIL BILL :\10 . 53 . fNTRODUCED BY COL'NC IL MEMBER BRAD HAW ) AN ORDfNANCE VA ATl:--G A PORTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LO CATED IN THE 2-1 00 BLOC K OF SOUTH PECOS STREET BY THE CITY OF E:\IGLEWOOD. COLORADO. COUNCIL MEMBER WOLOS~ '.\10VED, AND IT WAS SECONDED, TO APPROVE AGE:'\DA ITE'.\'111 (b) (iii)-ORDINANCE NO. 52 , SERIES OF 2001. Ayes : Coun ci l Members i abholz, Garren. Bradshaw. Wolosyn Grazulis. Burns Nays: None Abstain : Council Member Yurc hick The mmion carried. (c) Re solutions and Motions There were no additional resolutions or motions submined for approval. (See Agenda Item IO -Co nsent Agenda .) 12 . General DiKussion (a) Mayor's Choice (i) Mayor Bums congratulated Janet Gnmmen and the City for re ceiving a special Co lorado NAHRO Award for excellence in affordable housing and community service assisting the House of Hope . Council Member Bradshaw asked if they could talk about the House of Hope and the letter prese nted by Bill Clay,on. he said she knows we don't usuall y do that , but it doesn 't seem like S900.00 is a Im o f mone y. We have Sl.4 rrullion in Project Build funds just sining there, and since we aren't doing Project Build, she said , I think we could afford $900.00 out of that . Co un ti Member \Volosyn said it was in the rehabilitation fund . Council Member Bradshaw said that is rehab1litanon of a fa 1h ty that obviously we need more of in Arapahoe County. Englewood stepped up to the plate on that one. so he felt "'e could use the funds from there . City Manager Sears said he did not know exactly what that was , but we would estimate around S 1,000.00. Council Member Garren suggested allowing up to $900.00. Council Member Bradshaw felt up to S 1.000.00 would be appropriate. That way we can give them an answer, because they are on a deadline . Ma yo r Bums said it looks like the y are on a pretty tight nme frame . • I • 0 -- • • -• Englewood City Council September 4, 200 I Page 25 :--.. Counci l Member Grazulis felt that was an excellent idea . • .. • - COUNCIL MEMBER BR.\DSHAW MOVED, AND IT WAS SECONDED. TO USE COM'.\1UNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDS, UP TO Sl.000.00. TO PAY FOR THE HO US E OF HOPE PERi\11T FEES FOR A SPRINKLER SYSTEM. Ayes : Nays : The motion carried. Council Members Nab hol z. Garren, Bradshaw, Wolosy11 Yurchick, Grazulis , Bums No ne (b) Council Members ' Choice (i) Counci l Member Grazulis stated, regarding this evening 's dog issue . that she is kind of embroiled with them. There are several educational re source s, including Linda Han . She sa id she ha s other resources that she would love to offer to Council. This would be names and numbers o f peopl e who hav e volunteered before. There is another dog trainer in Englewood, and we went to the sc hool s and tried to approach them about what children should do around dogs , and were flatl y told no . the y hould 11 01 be taught that. She felt that, if they were approached in a different wa y, thi s would be an excellent opponunity to include all aspects . She said she would love to be in on that. Coun cil Member Bradshaw asked about using the Health and Safety Commi tte e through the c hoo ls. he felt it wa s a perfect venue . Mayor Burns said it se ems as though , if yo u approach the schools in the nght wa y. the y should not mm yo u down . Ms . Grazuli s said the y were turned down flatl y many times, because if was an insurance issue . There were going to be demonstration dogs , and they wondered what would happen if the y turned on a child . Co uncil Member Bradshaw felt it could be offered on a Saturday at ele menta ry schools. and th e mtere sted parents could be there with their kids , because parents need to be educated , too. (ii) Council Member Wolosyn said she and Council Member Bradsha w anended th e bond steering comminee meeting last week. During that meeting , Sel Hewin said he had anended a sc hool board meeting and the discussion of the School/City meeting came up . Apparentl y Dr. White wa s going to talk to City Manager Sears about having it sometime in October. Mr. Sears said he did mention it last week, and his secretary is trying to put together a couple of dates. even in September. He thought the 14tt, and the 20tt, were the two dates that had been talked about . He said he was sorry he did not raise that earlier, but they would like to get together and we will try to give Coun cil a phone call tomorrow with the dates they have come up with . Co un cil Member Bradshaw said we need to have a set agenda that goes out ahead of time . Council Member Grazulis sa id she was a representative for that, and the y were asked about the two dates. On the 20tt, she would not be there , she said, beca use it was going to be an evening session at 6 :30 p.m. She thought she could be there on the 14 tt,. City Manager Sears said , if that is the case , we will let all of Counci l be aware of that. We will ge t hold of Co uncil tomorrow when that date is set up . he said . • • I I • 0 • • -• Englewood C ity Counc il September 4 , 200 I Page 26 13. City Manager's Report . . ., • .. • • (a) Caty Manager Sears advised that this Thursday night is actually a meeting of the Counc il and he was not sure if it had to be set as a special meeting. City Anomey Brotzman sa id that. if the Mayor says it right now, he just se t it . Council Member Grazulis asked what time that would be. City Manager Sears said it would be at 5:-1 5 p .m . and he hoped to be done by 7 :00 p .m . Mayor Bums said City Anomey Brotzman said he just needed to declare that Council wi ll ho ld a spec a al Study Session on Thursday night , September 6 , 2001. at 5:45 p .m. in C ity Council Conference Room regarding the Proposed 2002 Budget. Council Member Bradshaw asked about the location of the City Council Conference Room. Council Member Garren said it is on '.he third floor , south side . Ms . Bradshaw said she just wanted to be sure everyone knew where it was . (b) City Manager Sears said there was some additional work being done on redi stncting. Tom Munds had let him know about it last week. There are some meetings bemg held next Monday ni ght in Arapahoe County. He said he would get more information to Council tomorrow about that from Laun Dannemiller. (c) City Manager Sears advised that Ri ck Kahm had put o ut so me pads for th e Council Chamber seats. He felt they were a lot bener than the last ones. 14. City Attomey·s Report The City Anomey had no rnaners to discuss. 15 . Adjournment MA \'OR BURNS MOVED TO ADJOURN. The meeting was adjourned at 10 :30 p .m . ..... , . • I ) I • 0 PLEASE PRINT NAME • • • ) .... • -.. PUBLIC COMMENT ROSTER AGENDA ITEM 7 aNICHEDULED Vl&rroRS DATE: September 17, 2001 UNSCHEDULED VISITORS MAY SPEAK FOR A MAXIMUM OF FIVE MINUTES ADDRESS ' ... • TOPIC ) I· 0 - • • • • .. :-· ~· ..... .. l • • -.. PROCLAMATION WHEREAS , the National League of Cities is committed to promoting racial equality and justice as a fundamental aspect of a healthy community: and WHEREAS, the National League of Cities has urged local officials across the country to join together in a national campaign to promote racial equality and justice; and WHEREAS , by resolution, the National League of Cities , declares racism unjust and advocates equal rights for all : and WHEREAS, by Act of Congress of the United States dated July 2. 1964 . the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was adopted banning discrimination because of a person's color , race . national origin, religion, or sex ; and WHEREAS , by Act of Congress of the United States dated July 9 , 1868 , the 14•h Amendment of the Constitution of the United States giving all persons born or naturalized in the United States the right to due process and equal protection under the law ; and WHEREAS, National League of Cities President Dennis W . Archer. mayor of Detroit, Michigan. has invited local officials across the country to renew their commitment to ensuring racial equality and justice for all beginning on September 19. 2001 ; NOW THEREFORE , I , Thomas J. Burns, Mayor of the City of Englewood. Colorado. hereby proclaim September 11, 1111 u: aACB EQUALITY DAY in the City of Englewood, Colorado . I urge all of our residents to join together to support this effort. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council of the City of Englewood. Colorado reaffirm our commitment to ensuring racial equality and justice in our City . GIVEN under my hand and seal this 17th day of September. 2001. Thomas J . Burns, Mayor ,, ' ~ • . " • 8a 0 I • 0 • • • • .. • - PROCLAMATION WHEREAS. youth suicide is one of the most disruptive and tragic events a family and a community can expenence, and is occurring at a national rate of over 5.000 youth suicides annually and is the second-leading cause of death for people between the ages of 15 and 2-l nationwide; and WHEREAS. youth suicide is the "fastest growing killer of youth today"; and WHEREAS. Colorado is one of the leading states of lughest youth s uicide s with at least one youth suicide every week; and WHEREAS, suicide kills youth 3 to 6 times more than hom1c1de . Research shows that all youth suicides are preventable; and WHEREAS , the issue of youth suicide and how to prevent it 1s of extreme importance and must be recognized as an immediate need for awareness and prevent10n : and WHEREAS , stat1Stics show that awareness. education and action doe s save lives. Heightened community awareness will encourage communitie s to develop strategie s to prevent youth suicides. The City of Englewood, the founding home of the Yellow Ribbon program . 18 pleased to be at the forefront m leading these worthwhile efforts : and WHEREAS . the Yellow Ribbon is rapidly becoming recognized internationally as the symbol for the awareness and prevention of Youth suicide . It is recognized and used by swcide prevention groups , cns1s centers, schools. churches, youth centers/hospitals, counselors , teachers, parents and especially youth themselves ; NOW THEREFORE , I. Thomas J. Burns. Mayor of the City of Englewood, Colorado. hereby proclaim the week al September H -IS, IOOl u: YELLOW RIBBON YOUTH SUICIDE AWARENESS AND PREVENTION WEEK in the City of Englewood . Colorado . I urge all of our citizens to work to prevent youth s uicide , wear a yellow nbbon and to raise awareness and tolerance around all people affected by this tragedy . GIVEN under my hand and seal this 17th day of September, 2001. Thomas J . Burns. Mayor • I • 0 I • • • • • - PROC LA,'v1ATI0 1 WHEREAS, the Se ptembe r 11 'h ·'At t ack o n Am e rica·· d ee pl y touch e d Am e ri can cit ize n s a nd peopl e a ll ove r th e world ; a n d WHEREAS , the City of Englewood , Colo rad o. a lo ng with t he e ntire st ate , a nd the rest of the n a ti on , mo urn the liv es lo st during thi s na ti o na l trage d y ; a nd WHEREAS , the C ity of Englewood wi s hes to o ff e r symp at h y a nd suppo rt fo r t he famili es a nd fri e nds o f the victim s of thi s trage d y; and W HEREAS . th e C itv of En glewood a lso wi shes to h o no r a nd co mm end t h e h eroic e ff orts di spl aved bv resc u e wo rke rs a nd o th e r s wh o h ave co me t0 t h e a id of t h e injure d ; a nd \V HEREAS. t he Ci t y o f Englewood e n co urag e, o ur co mmunitv to co ntinue its suppo rt fo r o ur na t io n ·s gri c\'in g , as we ll a t h ose in jured . t he ma nv resc u e wo rke rs a nd vo luntee r,, a nd o ur gO\·e rnm e n t leaders; NOW , THEREFO RE . we , th l' C itv ouncil of t he Ci tv o f Englewood , Colorado . he re bv ex t e nd t hl' C itv 's hea rt fe lt co nd o le n ce\ t0 t he fa mili es of th e victim of t h e u agedv in New Yo rk C ity a nd o ur Nation ·s apit0I on Septem be r I I , 200 I . \ \'e a l,o o ffe r o u r gra t eful a pprecia ti o n to th e m a n y res ·ue wo rk e r\ a nd vo lunteer5 a nd to a ll the Am e ri ca n c it ize n s wh ose ges tures of uppo n an d unit,· have helped defi n e Am e ri ca as a strong co untry o f ca rin g , co mpass io n a t e , a nd pro ud peo p le ADOPTED AN D APPROVED t hi 1 7'1, d av of e ptc mher . 200 I . Tho mas I . Burns . M avor Do ugla, Garre tt , Coun c il M e mbe r Beve rl y J. Br a d haw , M ayo r Pro T e rn Juli t' A. G rawli , Coun ci l ,\\e m be r Ann I a bh o lL, Coun cil M e mbe r Olga W o losyn . Counci l M e mbe r Mi c hael Yurc hick , C ounc il M e mbe r • 0 I • 0 - • • -• • .. ~ ... .. . . ' • .. A RESOLUTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF MARCIA G. O'BRIEN AS AN ASSOCIATE MUNICIPAL JUDGE FOR THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO . WHEREAS, pursuant to Article IX , Part II , Section 68 , of the Englewood Home Rule Charter, "Council may appoint one or more associate judges, who shall sit at such times and upon such causes as shall be determined by the presiding municipal judge;" NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO, THAT : Sectjon 1. Marcia G . O'Brien, shall be and hereby is appointed as an Associate Municipal Judge in and for the City of Englewood , Colorado , for a term co mm e ncing September 18 , 2001 and expiring September 17, 2005 . ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 17th of September. 200 l . Thomas J . Bums, Mayor ATTEST : Loucrishia A. Ellis. City Clerk I. Loucrishia A. Ellis , City Clerk for the City of Englewood , Colorado , hereby certify the a bove is a true copy of Resolution No ._, Series of 2001. Loucrishia A. Ellis • . , I • 0 - • • • Date September 17, 2001 INITIATED BY: Municipal Court • .. • - COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Agenda Item 8c Subject: Appo intm ent. of Asso cia te Judge Marcia O 'Brien I STAFF SOURCE: Tamara W o lfe Court Administrator COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION The Municipal Court supports City Council 's goal of prov iding appropriate service le vels by requestin g that they continue to appoint Associate Judges to serve the City of Englewood. RECOMMENDED ACTION Pres iding Judge Vincent Aten cio requests that the Council appoint Marci a O 'Brien to serve a 4 year term as an Associate Judge for the City of Englewood, commencing September 18, 2001 and ex pirin g September 17, 2005 . BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED Ass ociate j udges are required in order for the Court to maintain a full time, full service , sc hedule. Th e judges fill in for the Presiding Judge when there is a conflict of interest, illness or vacation . Ms. O 'Brien meets the qualifications required to serve as an Associate Judge . An additional Associate Judge is required at this time in order to preserve adequate service le v els . FINANCIAL IMPACT There is no additional financial impact, as associate judge fees are included in the annual budget. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Proposed Resolution . • ) I • 0 PLEASE PRINT NAME • • ;. ~--· • ,,; • - City of Englewood AGENDA ITEM 9 (a) tEIIMtGROSTER DATE: September 17, 2001 ADDRESS ~ ~ . . , I . 0 • • "-'-Elpllllllunll Dllll llerwlce Fundl Debt 5eMce Finis accocn for the IICClfflJlalion and payment of bond p,itqa and inlBtBst ohK lhan lang-lBtm dtb aa:outfld for in an BIIIBtptisB or inlemal se,w;e funds Comnuily Cir Bond Fund $ 430,000 $ 478.270 ConCl9le ~ Oislrict 1992 $ $ PO I 36 • S Plane River Drive $ $ P0137 -Ylle s 3,374 s 3,900 ConCl9le ~ Oislrict 1995 s 6,420 $ 4,152 P0138 $ 69 ,016 $ 78.200 PO 135 • Nlvljo s 42 ,524 $ 12,885 ' .. ._,,_. Splcil/ ,-..,. Fllldaaccocnfor.,._ _,,,., n ... ~ tompnfuw for pri;u/er putp0811$. eor-.iion TNII Fund $ 313,000 s 280 ,700 Commercial Rewolving l.l*I Fund $ 10,800 $ 25 ,400 Comnuily Dllvlllapmenl Fund $ 150,000 s 150,000 Donora Fund s 168,800 s 240,720 capila/ Projects Finis ICClllld for the acquisilion 1111d C011111Uc11or1 of major faailifies other lhan those liMnced by p,oprillfaty funds and flllStfunds . Public I~ Fund C8pital Project& Fund $ 3,422 ,400 S 3,954 ,760 s s Jon v .... Me lllpllUI /egll/ nifies in "'1idl ~,,.. lqlllt in ...... and"** dwify for the banalil of ... p,'1lic or 8IMl)f,.... and in "'1idl lhe ~ nJllin ongoing linancilll ..... Ulllm'Englewood Wllllwller T.-...i Pin Fund S 16,968,045 S 16,955 ,629 -. • ... • - "-'-&plndlbne lnwnll Service Funda lnl8mal Setvice Finis IICCWII for the financing of goods or S6MC8S prrwidBd by one depallment or agency to ohK departments or agencies of the gcwemment, and to olher gcN9rTIITl6(1tal t#lits , on a cost l8imbutsement basis. Semcenter Fund $ 1,553 ,647 $ 1,506 ,085 Capital Equip Replacement Fund $ 873 ,733 s 643 .310 Cenlral Services Fund s 351,000 s 627 ,051 Risk Management Fund $ 855 ,661 $ 864 ,359 Employee Beneli1& Fund s 3,437.242 s 3,874 ,515 Enllrprile Fundl f,,,,,,,,.. Finis &'COin for opnllOns liMnced and apnled in a -similar to p,illlfe bus#*8 lllfllpfises . Waler Fund s 5,665 ,81 1 s 7.228 ,750 Sewer Fund s 6,185.282 $ 12 ,383 ,369 Slam, Drainage Fund $ 159,000 $ 262.262 Golt Courie Fund s 2,019 ,300 $ 1,990 ,443 Concl9le Utility Fund $ 525 ,000 s 1,302 ,465 Housing Rehlbilillliol1 Fund $ 1,218,500 $ 1 .218 ,500 The Fidut:iaty Finis CDnlist of flllSt funds and agency funds . Trust Finis an, usad to &'COin tor asse1s held by the City in a trust capacity. Agllncy funds .,. USBd to account for assefs held by the Cify IS 11(/n for incM*als, ptivale Ol9lflizations, ohK gow,,nmenls , an6'or other funds. Malley Cenler TNII Fund Pllb & RecrNlion TNII Fund Special~ Sulplus & Deliciency Fund $ s $ 43,000 $ 14,000 $ 37 ,670 $ 20 ,000 4,807 55,800 . ' 0 2002 Proposed Budget Summary City of Englewood 0 - • • • . . .. ,. ( ' • • 2002 GENERAL FUND REVENUES ---- PloplllyTu Sp1Ci1ic o.n.11,ip Tu SIIN&U..T- Cigll*Tu Fnnclile F- LiceNN' PenMa ~...,,.,..,._... Revenue • r•Prope,1y Tu -- •Speclllc: °""*9lip Tu DS...&U.1- DCigalwlelu .FtaneHle "-•Ucerwa & Pennlll -~-............. ~ DRNa & Foitalu9I •etwv-lor Serw:N •1n1e1ee1 • ......._ & Olhar ----- 2,450,000 Finel & Forteilurls 923,285 250,000 Ctwvel tor SeMcel 1,545,853 25 ,IXi0,000 lnllnlll 405 ,400 1125,000 RlcMliol't 1,357,970 1,1158,000 ....._,a..r 147 ,100 834,990 1,350,264 Tolll....,.. • -.m.m . . \ ... 0 2002 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 8 Legislation I, •city Attorney CCourt I\ Caty Manage, •Finanee & Admin 11 •1ntonnation Tecll l4"!. \•Public Wort<s CContinQency , , •Safety Svcs 1, .Community Dev \ Dllbrery •Recreetion • Human R8SOUfC8S • Debt Setvice Legillalion 413,002 NJlic WO!tls 5,193,756 City Allolnly 722 ,872 Safely SeMcel 15,094 ,109 Coult 800,429 Comnuily Developmenl 1,875 ,432 CilyMsllglf 693,832 Litnry 1,243,1 08 Htllwl Relot.ces 672 ,024 ReclNlion 4,802,526 FIIWIC8 & Almn . Selvices I ,696,856 Debi SeNice 1,874 ,200 lnlormllion Technology I ,475,310 Conlingency 80 ,758 T olal Expendilufes • -.111.21• • • • .. ••• • SS...'-'"'-S-"-~'-~'"~~~~~<.._<.._~----~'-~<.._~~~ PROOF OF PUBLICATION = THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD STATE OF COLORADO ss COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE I, Jeremy Bangs, do solemnly swear that I am lhe Editor ol the Englewood Herald and that lhe same is a weekly newspa· per pubiished in the city or Littleton in the County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterrupt- edly in said County of Arapahoe for a period of more than 52 weeks prior to ~< the first publication or the annexed (~ notice; that said newspaper is entered in (j the Post Office of Littleton, Colorado , - as Second Class Mail matter and that the said newspaper is a newspaper within the meaning of the act of the General Assembly of the State of Colorado, approved March 30, 1923, and entitled HLegal NotlcH and Advertisements" and other acts relat· ing to the printing and publishing of legal notices and was published in the regular and entire issues or said newspaper, once each week , on the same day of each week, for a period of • CI TY OF ENGLEWOOO Nola rs hefeby given that the City Council of the Coty of Englewood . CokndO ** hOed • Pubhc HNnng °" ... 2002P....-........ on -y. SEPTEMBER 17 . 2001 . • 7 30 p.m., 1n the Cny COuncil Chllmben of Englewood CMC Cenlor. 1000 Englewood P-y. E~. ~---"' ... ~· .. __ input_ ... 2002 Pn)c>oNd lludgol. I-pan;.. may·-opin,ant ., pe,wor, II the Public Hearing or in wnling ID be-by lhe Coty Cieri< by ~:00 p.m. on -17 . 2001 An-~ a,_... a1 the Public HNring may coll !he City Clerk's 0-. 303-792-2"°5 o, 303-762-2•23. a, IChedute their presentation or • sign up shNI Wtll be aveilable at the dOOr. By onlor of the Englewood .Coty Council. ~A.EU;o ,CMC Cly°"" 1000 Englowoad ~ Englowoad.~80110 ~ _...,,_ ...... ,.-...... , .. - E...--111732 ----- .. ~) (j ., ,.,'i '-'.~ ,, >J) • ·~ '· • ;_, '· • ,1 ' j , 'l ,· I/ ,.,\ ,,, ,, :;, '-' , ~\ ,.,, ~) ~ ,: . •• '; ;· " t.'i ;, ;: CJ ;, ;_ '· '· '· . ,: '· . } i 0 I • 0 • • -• I · '•· ,.,-, • • • ' BY AUTHORITY .. ORDINANCE NO._ SERTES OF 2001 COUNCIL BILL NO. 56 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER GARRETI AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT ENTITLED "CONTRACT AGREEMENT FOR INTOXILVZER 5000EN PL.\C&IIBNT' BBTWUN THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, LABORATORY AND RADIATION SERVICES DMSION AND THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . WHEREAS. the Colo r ado Department of Health ha s mandated that all current lntoxilyzer 5000 instruments u sed by all Co lorado law enforcement agencies. be replaced with the Model 5000EN n o later than July 1, 2002 ; a nd WHEREAS, the Intoxilyzer 5000E is the most accurate, r eliable , state-of-the-art equipment available a nd capable of remotely transmitting data a nd diagnostic information to the Co lora d o Department of Health ; and WHEREAS, the Englewood Safety Services Departme nt currently ow n s one Intoxilyzer 5000 a nd would have be e n compelled to purchase an lntoxilyzer 5000EN in the fiscal yea r 2002 : a nd WHEREAS, the City of Englewood Safety Service Department apphed a nd has been awarded a grant for fundmg wluch will s uppor t a replacement program to update the current lntoxilyzer 5000 with the enhanced lntoxilyze r 5000EN; and WHEREAS, the grant will proVJd e 75 % of the funding for a new lntoxilyze r 5000EN and the City will provide matchmg funds for the remaining 25 %; NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, CO LORADO . AS FOLLOWS: Sectio n J. The City Co unci l of the City of Englewood . Colorado hereby authorizes t he e ntering into a n intergovernmental agreement e ntitled '"Contract Agreement For lntoxilyze r 5000EN Placement," a copy of which is marked as "Exhibit A " a nd attach ed hereto. Sectjon 2. The Director of Safety Services is hereby a uthorized to sign said "'Co ntract Agreement For Intoxilyzer 5000EN Placement" intergovernmental agreement on behalf of the City of Englewood. Introd uced , read in full , a nd passed on first r eadin g on the -lth day of September, 2001 . -I - • 0 10 bi I • 0 - • • .. • - Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 7th day of September, 2001. Read by title and passed on final reading on the 17th day of September, 2001. Published by title as Ordinance No. _, Series of 2001 , on the 21 " day of September, 2001. Thomas J . Burns, Mayor ATTEST: Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk I, Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood , Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No.~ Series of 2001. Loucrishia A. Ellis -2 - • ... I • 0 • • -. • • -... CONTRACT AGREEMENT FOR INTOXIL YZER SOOOEN PLACEMENT A la w enforcement agency must agree to th e follow ing cond1t1ons before l ntox 1ly zer i'v cde l 5000EN placement is appro ved 1 .0 Total cost of the unit 1s S5 .600 .00. Co lo rad o Department of Publ ic Health and Env ironment w ill provide 75 % or 54 ,200 .00 in fund s provided by Highwa y Sa fet'/ Pro ject Grant tow ard the purchase of the in strument. Eac h law enforcement agenc y will contribute in match 25% of cost to purchase lntox ilyzer Model 5000 EN . Agenc y will pro vide S1 ,400 .00 in funds payable directly to manufacturer, CM I, Inc . 2 .0 Law enforceme nt age nc ies agree to use the lntoxilyz er 5000EN inrenced for t e purpose of supoort ing the enforcement of Driving Under the ln fl uer.ce of Alcohcl an d or Drug s s,a tutes . These act ivi t ies are performed in support of the Depart ert goal to prov ide for pub li c health and safety through efforts to reduce alcoho l and drug -rnlated crashes, veh icular assa ults and re lated fata li t ies and j uv en il e vi olati c for Illega l Possess ion /Consumption of Eth yl Alcohol by an under age person. The Departme nt is charged w ith these respons :bil it ies under the Colorac o Re vi sed Statutes (CR S ) Sect ions 43-4-402 , 42-4-130, 1303 and 1304 (V eh1c !e anc Traffic Alcohol and Drug Offenses ), Sectio n 18-3-205 CRS (Vehicular Assau lt ). spec ificat ion of tes t s under Sec tion 18 -3-106 CRS (Vehicu la r Hom ic ide ), Sect ion 18 -13 -22 (U de, ase possess ion or cons-.!mpt ion ). 3 .0 Law en forcem ent age nc ies agree to fo llow a nd ab ide b all gu ide lines a nd requirements se t forth in the RULES AND REGULAT ION S CONCErl.i' 11 G T E:S T I G FOR ALCOHOL ANDOTH ER DR UG S A.PPRO I/EIJ Bv Tt-'E COLORADO BOARD OF H EALTH , 5 CCR 1005-2 , e ffect ive Januar; 30 , 1S99 . 4 .0 Each age ncy w ill p rovice for law enforcemen t persornel to attend tra i in£; at the Departme nt to be tra ined as certifi ed l ntox ilyzer Opera or lns,ruc:crs . Eac:1 aser:c '/ is requ ired to have at least one cert ified lntox ilyzer 5000E Operator/ Instructor on staff. 5 .0 The certified l ntoxilyzer 5000E N Operator/ Instructor fer eac . agency v II er.c ue: at lea s t one training class to train personne l to be certified as lntox ilyzer 5000 E Operato rs. Each agenc y is rec;ui red to ha ve at least NO cer:if:ec I tox 1l yzer 5COO E1 Operators on staff . 6 . Eac h ase ncy w ill use the ir lntox ily=er Mccel 5000EN unit for Ooeratcr ra ir.ins classes and fol lo w class material as pro icea by the Department. 7 .0 Each age nc y will comp ly w ith loca•ion rec;uirements and equ ip er t needs determinec by t e Department and be sub Jec: to on-s ite inspections ·or I roxily zer lodel 5000 EN locat ion to determine compl iance for approv al. 8 . Eac h asenc: w ill be accountable for the lntoxilyzer Model SO OO EN throusnout the use ful life of the equ ipment. When t e un it is no lo nger used for the orig ina l inter.dee purpose or ca no lon£;er be used 1t must be returned to the Departme nt. I! X H I 8 I T A ) . ' I· 0 • • • . ) ~,, • • - .. 9.0 Law enforcement agencies will cooperate in a collabora tive effort with other local law enforcement agenc ies to facilitate DUI enforcement efforts . 10 .0 Upon meeting these conditions , ownership of the lr.tox ilyzer Unit and equipment will be transfe rred to law enforcement agencies . This ownersh ip w ill be cont ingent upon the continued fulfillment of these condit io ns or the equipment will be returned to the ownership of the Colorado Department of Publ ic Hea lth and En vironm en t. AGENCY, E)leu,:-,,:;I O,~ o--t' S:ctAy SHERIF<-, Q;rec C,c cw ~ AUTHORIZING SIGNITURE: =.:., = DATE: 7(:n;c, I· 0 • • ORDINANCE NO._ SERIES OF 2001 t f.,, • ,I. ~ • - BY AUTHORITY ... COUNCIL BILL NO. 57 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER GARRETT AN 01.DINANCE ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF BAKER A VENUE AND TEJON STREET IN THB CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO. WHEREAS, a duplex has been built at the corner of Baker Avenue and Tejon Street by the current property owner; and WHEREAS , during the minor subdivision plat submittal for this development the City determined that a portion of the existing handicap ramp at this intersection was on private property; and WHEREAS . this dedication will create public Right-Of-Way over these sidewalk improvements; NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO , AS FOLLOWS: S,:ct,1on ! . The City Council of the City of Englewood. Colorado hereby accepts the dedication to the City of a twenty-two (22) square foot Right-Of-Way at the intersection of Baker Avenue and Tejon Street by the owner, Jackson Engineers, Inc., Thomas L . A. Jackson , President is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Introduced , read in full , and passed on first reading on the 4th day of September, 2001. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 7th day of September, 2001. Read by title and passed on final reading on the 17th day of Septem her , 2001. Published by title as Ordinance No ._, Series of 2001 , on the 21" day of September. 2001. Thomas J . Burns. Mayor ATTEST: Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk -1- ' ~ ' • 10 bii I • 0 - • • • • I·'!>-!..· .. • -' I , Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood , Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No . ~ Series of 200 L Loucrishia A. Ellis -2- .. I • 0 - • • • I• .. • - DEDICATION OF RIGHJ'.Of.WAY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS. that JACKSON ENGINEERS. INC .. THOMAS L. A. JACKSON, PRESIDENT. Owner, whose address is 8751 East Hampden -B2. Denver. Colorado 80231, of the property located at the intersection of Baker Avenue and Tejon Street (also known as 2001 West Balter Avenue). Enclewood. Colorado 80110, County of Arapahoe. State of Colorado, does hereby dedicate to the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , a mWllcipal corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the constitution of the State of Colorado . public richt-of-way for street and other City purposes upon. across. in, through and under the followiDc descnbed real property situate in the City of Eqlewood. County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado , to wit: A parcel of land situated in the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 28 . Township 4 South. Range 68 West of the 6111 Principal Meridian. a part of Lot 16. Block 2, Southlawn Gardens Annex. City of Englewood. County of Arapahoe. State of Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Commencinc at the Southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 28 and considering the East line of the ::.W Quarter of the SW Quarter of said section to bear N00°18'45"E : thence along said East line N00°18'45"E . a distance of 292 .26 feet to a point: thence N89°39'10" W, a distance of 30.00 feet to the 111tenect1011 of the Westerly line of Tejon Street (60.00 feet wide) and the Northerly line of Baker Avenue (50 .00 feet wide) and the point of beginning: thence along the Northerly line of said Baker Avenue . N89°39'10"W , a distance of 10.00 feet to a point of non-tangent curvature: thence alone the arc of non-tancent curvature to the Left . and arc length of 15 . 71 Feet. said curve having a Delta of 90°02'05··. a radius of 10 .00 feet and a chord which bears N45'19'48" E. a distance of 14.15 Feet to a polllt being on the Westerly line of said Tejon Street: thence along said Westerly line. S00' 18'45"\V . a distance of 10 .00 Feet to the Polllt of Becinninc . Containinc 22 square Feet of land or 0.0005 Acres of land. more or less. Also known by street address as: 200 l West Baker A ,·enue Enclewood. CO 80110 SIGNED AND DELIVERED this)/ ~ay of¥· 2001. STATE OF COLORADO COl.'NTY OF ) ) sa . ) JACKSON ENGINEERS, INC . By: Thomas L. A. Ja ~ V The fnrecoinc instrument was acknowleqed befnre me this ~a..y of 814't'.K-S C _ 2001. by Thomas L. A. Jacbon. President of Jacbon EqinNn. Inc. Ys owner. My Commiuion expirea: tf'l {.J, 0 o.S-' ~ .. I E I T ' . ( I • 0 - • • l• •,'-.I I -~f . L.01. lfi hUl::K l.. fp-1 _ •,•~ ll'-1 '. • \> ~ I 11'1 rt.I ""'('tt1;••·J · • .& ... •,l • 1f ': 'JI -.r:LU ,.·1 . " o:.,~· ·. , ~ o1 n:-.-· ... · 1·:,, • " • - EXHIBIT A SL U'.;, ~·h • :\, --,t: '""'-~f."·:: -~1:. : ,' '1 ' :,1 •: , . -.1 · N ·..:l ·"I . I ~:n, ' . : . ASPEN Surveying, :-' r..:1 ~I 'r. .::::;I Inc. .. ,· 2913 5o P£QIIIA 5"'11[E T 51,IT( 1,0 ...,... co eoo, .. -· (JOJ) r.c-•~90 .. .. • t 0 I • 0 3 • • • Date September 17, 200 1 Initiated By Library Department • '"· ... • -.. COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Agenda Item 10c i Staff Source Subject State of Colorado "State Grants to Libraries " Program -Year Two Hank Lo ng, Directo r o i Library Serv ices COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION .. This is the second ye ar that that Colorado has pro, 1ded this program . Fo r th e first year oi th e program, th e Englewood Public Libra ry received S 10,042 to purchas e ad diti o n al b oo ks fo r th e public. RECOMMENDED ACTION Th e Library Department re commends it\ Coun 11 appro, al of a Motion auth oriz ing th e L1brarv D epartm ent to appl y to th e Stat e oi Colorado tor und under th e annual Stat e Gran ts to Lib rari es program . BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED Pr ior t o last year and th e implementation of th l ate G ran t to Lib raries program, Colorado was one of o nl y five st ates th at did not re ce l\ e am dire t t at!:' funding. In 2000 th e Colorado Legislature passed a declarati o n (CRS 24-0-242 ). lat r sign db the Gmern o r, for the purp ose 0 1 making " ... grant m o ne s a, ailable to publi ly-uppo rted hbrarie . including public libraries, scho o l libraries, and aca demi librari es , to enable th ese 111~t1tut1 o n to o b ta111 educational resources th ev would o th e rwise be un able to afford, to th e end th at th tat e will re ce ive the co rr es p o ndin g benefits of a better educated and info rm ed p opulati o n ." Whil e th e Stat e Grants to Librari es program is vo luntary and w hil e every publicly-support ed librarv 1s eligible, each library must appl y to th e Co lo rad o State Library -th e agency respo nsible fo r administering this program and its rela ted funding -in o rder t o be conside red . One o f th e requirements of the State Grants to Libraries program is that eac h library th at acce pts th ese fu nds w ill implement a proce dure to limit th e ability of min o rs -th ose under age 18 -to gain co mputer access to materials that is o bs ce ne o r illegal. We believe that th e Engl ewood Publi c Library 's "smart ca rd " system and its associa ted Internet Po li cy and its Acceptable Int ern et Use Agreement mee ts this requirement. FINANCIAL IMPACT This is th e seco nd ye ar oi w hat is in tended to be an annual pro gram , depe nding on actual available approp riati ons . It is included in th e Colorado State Library's contin uin g budget. U nd er this program , eac h qualifying library will receive no t less than 53 ,000. Beyond that bas e leve l, additi o nal funding per library is based on its per c apita or per student service le vel. ' ' I • 0 - • • • .. • - For 2002, the Englewood Public Library is expected to receive a level of funding similar to that of the first year, i.e. approximately $10,000 . If some qualifying libraries fail to apply, their available funds will be divided among those qualifying libraries that do apply, which may result in an increase in EPL's funding. This will not be known, however, until the Colorado State Library recei ves the qualifying applications . This year's deadline for applications is October 1, 2001. These funds are designated for educational resources , i.e . library materials, and cannot be used for staff or computer equipment LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Completed "Application Fonn for State Funding Grants 2002 for Public Libraries " .. • I • 0 - • • Name of Library Address City/STATE/ZIP Contact Penon Telephone FAX E-Mail • • - APPLICATION FORM STATE FUNDING GRANTS 2000-2001 FOR PUBLIC LIBR-\RJES YEAR2 Englewood Public Library I 000 Englewood Park-way Englewood, Colorado 80110 Hank Long. Librarv Director (303) 762-2572 FEIN (Federal Employer Identification Number) (303) 83-6890 hlong@ ci .engewood.co.us 84-6000583 This cenifies that the Englewood Public Librarv meets all the Qualifications to Receive Funding for a public Library. I. Legally established and operated under Colorado Library Law . Legal Yes .A. No establishment document is on file at the State Library . 2 . Borrows and lends to other Colorado libraries without a charge . Yes .A. No 3. Belongs to the Colorado Library Card (CLC) program. Yes .A. No 4 . Panicipates in the Colorado Library Computer Network by providing at least one public computer that accesses the World Wide Web, including Yes .A. No the Colorado Vinual Library on ACLIN in 50% of public libraries available to the general public . 5 . Makes no charges to primary ciientele to use the ILL service Yes .A. 0 or access the Internet or World Wide Web. 6 . Meets Internet access for minors requirements in YcsJ_ No C.R.S . 24-90-404 (d ) (I. II. lll) 7. Library is open an average of at least 20 hours per week for Yes .A. No public access to library ervices. 8. Staff the library with person/s paid with local taX funds during Yes l 0 all hours library is open to the public. 9 . Will use funds to purchase educational materials. Yes .A. No 17 Updated August 15 , 2001 v .4 ) I • 0 • • • • l'-.... • - 10 . Reponing -will submit repon to State Library annually . 11 . Has on file at State Library , if applicable, documented financial suppon for populations served beyond legal service area. .. .. Yes_K_ 0 NA ...K__ Yes No 12 . Complies with Maintenance ofEffon requirements. Yes_K_ No C.R.S. 24-90-404 (2)© Total operating income from local tax sources , excluding capital expenditures and grants to the library. Do not include the first year State Funding Grants received in the current year calculations. FY99 FYOO FYOI Total Average for three years 1 117 670 I 170 670 I 204 228 3 492 568 I 164 189 Local tax operating income to the library for FY 2002 I 238 518 13 . Any reduction in local income must not result in a cut to the library funding greater than the percentage cut in the governing body 's income . If 2002 library is less than the average for the previous three (3) years, please provide the Following information : % reduction in governing entity income FY 2002 % reduction in libraries budget FY 2002 14 . Under the TABOR amendment, can you accept the amount allocated to your organization? Yes_K_ No Thomas J . Bums. Mayor. City of Englewood Chaor ofBoard of Trustees (or otha oppropnalC authonty ) PRINTED NAME Hank Lon Library D1rcc1or PRINTED NAME For State Library Uw 0.ly Meets eligibility requirements Yes No Deput y SUit< Libranan SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE Grant Award $ _______ _ DATE 18 Updated August 15, 2001 v .4 ' ' • ) I • 0 • • ,. ~·. ORDINANCE NO ._ SERIES OF 2001 • • - BY AUTHORITY ABIU.FOR , . .. COUNCIL BIU. NO . 59 JNTRODU CEDBYCOUNCIL MEMBER------- J/tl AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A "LICENSE AGREEMENT' FOR CONDUIT FOR UNDERGROUND CABLE ACROSS THE CITY DITCH RIGHT-OF-WAY TO AT&T BROADBAND. WHEREAS, AT&T Broadband requested a Llcense Agreement in order to ins tall an underground conduit for cable across the City Ditch located at the new development "Aspen Grove" s hopping center on South Santa Fe Drive north of Mineral Ave nue ; a nd WHEREAS , the passage of this Ordi na nce will allow the install ation of a n underground bore of three (3), two inch (2'') PVC co nduits at a depth of app roximate ly thirteen fe et (13') across the City's Right-Of-W ay fo r the City Ditch : a nd WHEREAS , the Engl.ewood Water a nd Sewer Bo a rd recomm e nded Co uncil ap prova l of the "License Agreement" to AT&T Broa dband by te le phone vote on Sep te mbe r 7, 2001 meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUN CIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO , AS FOLLOWS : Sectjon 1. The "License Agreement" to AT&T Broadband for conduit for cable across the City Ditch, as described in "Attachment l ", is hereby accepted and approved by the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado . Sectjon 2. The Director of Utilities is authorized to execute the "License Agreement" for and on behalf of the City of Englewood, Colorado . Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 17th day of September, 2001. -1- I • 0 ? • • • • . ' ' ~ • - Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 21st day of September, 2001. Thomas J . Burns, Mayor A'ITEST: Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk I , Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk of the City of Englewood , Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true copy of a Bill for an Ordinance , introduced , r ead in full , and passed on first reading on the 17th day of September, 2001. Loucrishia A. Ellis -2- , . I • 0 3 • • • • 7 ~ ' , . • -' Accachmenc 1 T~IS LIC E:\'SE _.\G REE:\IE:\'T. m a · e ::mci e::mrec: :.nto as of tius day oi ------• ~COL :,y a ::d be:·.,·eee1 the CITY OF E:\'GLEWOOD. a munic:pal cor:i or:1:10 r. Ji the S t ate oi Colo raci c. here1 ::1 r e :'errec: to as "'Cu:-.-··. and TCI C_-\B LE\ !SiO:\' OF GE.ORGL-l.. r:-:c. d':ia _-U&:' BE0 • .\08_.\);D herem re:e r:eci :o ·as "Licensee". W T)JESSETE : T he Cic:.r w1t~out any ·.vo..r:-a:n:: cf :ts tide o r interest what3oeve !", he:e:? authori::e s Licensee to inscai! an underg:-our_ · bo r e of :hree (3 ). c·.,·o mch (2") PVC conc!u1:5 at a depth f app r o:Gm:1tel y thi.r:ee,i fe et (13 ''. ac r es; the City"s R1g!-.t -of-W3.y fo r the City D1tc:l. desc!"ibed as a parce! o f la:J.d .sauateC. 1:1 d:e :: 'St 1/2 oi .3~c t:c n ::!9 . To\vn ::::Up 5 S cud:, Ra::ige 68 West of the 6'" Pnnc:pa l '.\l e r:d::1::. Ccu::u :: oi . .\ra ;i ar.ce. State of Ccl or ac:c. dep1c:ed up o n Exh1i:m .-',.. atta hed he r eto and :nac:e a ;i ·: hereo i . 1 . _--L'1y co nstr1..1c:1 on co nc er=.pia :e d or per:·c r:::e...: ·.1:::=~· t!'l!s :..1 ce :1 5e .s C3.ll con:.;i::: ·.v :::1 a :-.' con.io r:n co star:da rds :or:nu·ated oy t ::e 91rec :cr cf L:ilic:es oi :he Cit:: and 3uc:: co r:5tr'...l ct1on s h:1 1! be per:"orc.eci anci. co o p:e:e:: .:ic::>r~-:g :o t=:e ~lans 3pp roved C:: :::e City . " The License e 3ha.il :1 oti .... fy che Cit/.; D1r ec:or or" :.:c.:.:.ties J.t :es.st ::ll"ee (3) da _·s !"'r:cr :c the tune o f co mm encement o f the co n:::truc:i on of. or any repairs :n:1d e to. lice n see·.:; cond tu t 30 t :lJ.t thi: Cic:: m ay. ir: it3 d1sc:-et:on. u::spect .;uch o ~-c :-'.lt:ons. 3. vv:c:11:1 :I"..1r::: (3 0 ) C.:i.ys :r oe the d3te of co mwe ::ce :n e nt of const:-ucnon '.J i .;a1C ~o ::du::. the Li ce nse~ ;!:ill co mp lete ;uch co nstruc::on. place ::ind m aint::un pe r::::i ane ,it, v,s1l:ie m3r.!.i:e!'s . or' J. type a r:ci at suc!l loc3t1o ns as des1g:1ated by che City s Duec:.o r o{ C 1hues, r eier r :::1 g to he ce nterline of the instal!auon and oha · dear the '"OS31 :: J.re.1 ci .1:1 .;c r...s:ruc ::c n :ieOr:s ar:d re~tore the ::i.r ea co 1t3 previous co r: ·::100 as r:.e1:' 33 =.1 .. be :e:isc raao.-e In :he ~v~nt c::e p l.:i.c:ng of the ce:ite rline :n J.rke!.·s :i::ici t ~e c!e!lr::1~ ani res t:>r::n:o r. o { ~:le :-o ssi:ig :ireJ. is :1 ot co mp leca ci. w 1th1:1 t:le u c:e spcc:.i:e.:i . :~c Cl::: :n ::iy co ::::ip lete the wor · a t the sole expense of the Licensee . 4 . T::e Cit:: sha; ha ,·e th~ r:ght to :nai::l:::iin , mstai..t. repai.r . reoo,·e or re lo ca:e :;,.e Ct:: 5 . D1t::: or any ,Jther oi tts fac:.!.iues or tr.stallac:cr_s w1thm the Ctt::'o R1ghc-d-W.1::. a: a:::y t:..::1e a r..d t:i sc.c:l m :u :ne !" as t.1:e Cit:: dee m s r:e-.:essary o r cor:ve::.:e!lt . T:1:: c ·c:: :eserves :h~ axclus1ve ngnt t o control all ease::::ien ts and mscal!at:on s. The s~:pulat1on 0 and co n dinor.s ,Jf, tlus Lice ns e sha~ be i~cor po rated mto co mr7c: s!)ecmcanons u ,he const:-'-lc ::on ne:e1::11uthor::eu 1s to ~e do r.e on a contrac: oas:s . 6 . T:le !":g:'u:3 ~nd ?r1vileg~s 57:1::te ci ~n t:11s :...1ce ::se .ihal! be .;utjec: to pr:or agree:=ient3 , lice !"lse:; and/o r ~::ints . rec::rded -:,r 1.1:".re co rdt!d.. anci 1t sh1ll be :he L1censee·s .so le re::1=o ns10lllty ::o · eter:n 1ne t:le eY..isten ca of sa1C: ..:iccu cents o r c::nillic :1ng :.1ses o r 1nst1i :ic:or:s . a C e l I • 0 l • • • '. ,. • • • .. .. 7 . The Licensee shall contact and fully .ooperate with the Cic:is personnel and the construction shall be completed without interference with any lawful. usual or or dinar; flow of water through the City Ditch. Licensee shall assume all risks incident to the p ossible presence of suc::1 waters , or of stor:n waters. or of surface waters in the City Ditch. 8. All trenci:es or h oles within the Cicy·s Rights-of-Way shall be backfilled anci tamped :o the or iginal ground line in layers not to exceed six (6) inches loose measure to a compaction of runety per cent (90%) Standard Proctor :Vlaximum Density. 9. L icensee s hall indem:ufy and save harmless the Cit:.-, its officers and emplo:,ees, ag'.linst any and all claims. damages, actions or causes of action and expenses to wluch it or they may be subjected by reason of said access dnve being within a n d across the premises of the C ity or by reason of any work done or oc11ssi on made by Licensee , its agent s or employees. in connection wi th the constn1c:.on . r ep lace m ent. m aintenance or repair of said installation. 10. It is ex;iressly agreed that in case of Licensee's breach of any of the w:c:un pron:i ses . the Cit:; :nay , at its opno n. have spec:.fic perfor:nance the r ecf, or sue for damages resulting fr om such breach. 1 . Cpon abandonment of .my right or pr:vtlege herem grante d . the right of Licensee :o that extent shall ter:ninate. but its o bligation to indemnify and save har:nless the C it y , 1ts officer s and employees, shall n ot cer:n inate in any event In g:::ant~ng the above authorization. the Cit:; reser-,es the right to make full us e of t h e property mvolved as may be necessary or convenient m t he operation of the City Ditch system under the control of the City. I:-i 'vvl T::-rESS WHEREOF . this instrument has been executed :is oi the day and year 5.rst above written. APPROVED: By: ------------- S tewart F onda Direc:or of Ctilities CITY OF E::-.;GLEWOOD Acting through :ind by its Water and Sewer Boar:i By : ------------- • ..: ' I • C, - • • • ·~ t >, ATTEST: T itle (SE...1.L) ST . .\TE Of COLOR.-illO I\ , )ss. ,.--- • .. • • .. LICE);SEE: ~~vlSIO'.'i OF GEORGL.i..., I~_:~tZsllL . l Jcsei::h R. Stac :~hcu sa Serncr Vi ce Fres icer.t COC).TI OF +-1K;+Xt}1C<.... ) The fo~going .i~_trument was ack::iowledgedJl.efore ~e this ~:iy of ~; ~-= \ i , :i t:: :WOl , by:£,~fpb ,, 9CC'J,,k 1cu'.:,P, as ',j,( .,·v,,-e':,,(I C; \-ofTCI Caoiev1'i1 o n of Georgia , Inc. dba AT&T Broad band . I N WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set m y h:ind and affixed m y offic1:il seal the day and year first above written. My commission expires: -J - • -.: .. ~ • I • 0 • • • l· • • ' /.:.. SE T j (.['J 2 ~. TQV\ I Sri :F :) N C L ~-v -~~A~~~~~ t AS?S N GR OVE I ' FLA c::.~ .l l ~ = SC' EXISTING GRC ;,-, ""· ,.., ENGLEWOOD CITY DITCH r,ART CF TI,£ SEi 4 :C:CTION 29. TOWN SHIP 5 SO UTH . RANGE t33 NEi I 1 "= 5 C ' , Sixn-l FR!NC:P.AL ME~!DIAN. ARAPAHOE CO LJ Nl'r'. C8 LJ RAOO I ?O.Gi: 1 OF 1 • .. e X ... I B I T A 0 " I • 0 - • • • t• • • ' CO UN CIL COMMUNIC ATIO N Date Ag enda Item Sep tember 1 7, 2001 11 a i INITIATED BY STAFF SO URCE .. ~ Subj ect Ci ty Ditch License Agreemen t - TCI Cable vi si o n/AT&T Br oadband Utilities D epa rtm ent Stewart Fo nda, Director of Utiliti es COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COU NCIL ACTIO N None RECOMMENDED ACTIO N The Englewood Water and Sewer Boa rd recommended Council approval b O rdinance at th eir Sep tember 11 , 200 1 m ee ti ng of th e License Agreement wi th TCI Cable is ion oi Geo rgia1 AT & T Broad band . BACKGRO UND, ANALYSIS , AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED TCI Cablevisi on submitted a License Agreement to cross the City Ditch right-o f-way w ith an und erground bo re of thre e (3) two inc h (2") PVC cond uits 13' across th e City's Right-of-Way. Th is wi ll enable broadband cable to be buried, as required by code at the Aspen Grove de ve lopm en t located o n Santa Fe Drive. Englewood 's Cit Attorney has re v ie we d and approve d the license agreement. FINANCIAL IMP ACT None. LIST OF ATTACHME NTS Lic ense Agreement Ordinance • ' .. • I • 0 • • ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 2001 ,., BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR • .. • • .. COUNCIL BILL NO . 60 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER~~~~~~ AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A THIRD AMENDMENT TO AN AGREEMENT FOR ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER BETWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AND llTD. WHEREAS , the original intergovernmental agreement to cooperate in the development of the transit improvements with the Commercial Redevelopment Project was signed by both parties on January 6, 1997 ; and WHEREAS , the intergovernmental agreement was amended on July 19 , 1999, to provide, in part, for additional parking spaces and funding therefore ; and WHEREAS. the Englewood City Council approved the Second Amendment to Agreement for Englewood CityCenter by the passage of Ordinance No . 64 , Series 2000 ; and WHEREAS , the passage of this Ordinance would amend the agreement to provide for the construction of a splash curb behind the back of the existing curb between the face of the existing busway and the retaining wall for the Englewood Light Rail Station; the construction of a sidewalk between the Oxford Street Light Rail Train Station and Mansfield Street; and the installation of addit10nal bicycle lockers and benches at the Englewood Light Rail Train Station; and WHEREAS , RTD will pay for the cost of the construction of the splash curb; the bicycle lockers and the benches at the Englewood Light Rail Train Station. as well as the cost of the construction of the sidewalk at the Oxford Street Light Rail Train Station; NOW . THEREFORE , BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO. AS FOLLOWS : Sectjon ) . The "Third Amendment To Agreement" between the City of Englewood and RTD , attached hereto as "Attachment l." is hereby accepted and approved by the Englewood City Council . Sectjon 2. The Mayor is authorized to sign the "Third Amendment To Agreement" for and on behalf of the City of Englewood , Colorado. Introduced , read in full, and passed on first reading on the 17th day of September, 2001. -I - I • 0 • • • • ··\, .. .• • -.. Publishe d a s a Bill for an Ordinance on the 21 s t day of September , 2001. Thoma s J . Burns, Ma yor ATTEST: Loucrishia A. Ellis, City Clerk 1. Loucrishia A. Ellis , Cit y Clerk of the City of Englewood , Colorado , hereby ce rtify that the above and foregoing is a true copy of a Bill for a n Ordinance, introduced, r ead in full. and passed on first reading on the 17th day of September, 2001. Loucrishia A. Ellis -2- • ,. -: ~ . I • 0 • • • .. ,. • - THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER .. ATTACHMENT 1 This Third Amendment dated this ?-~-= day of -, 2001 , amends the Agreement dated January 6. 1997 between the Regional Transportation District (RTD) and the City of Englewood (the City) for participation by the RTD in the redevelopment of the Englewood CityCenter and for the conveyance of a transit easement to RTD therein. This Third Amendment to the above-referenced Agreement is to provide for the construction of a splash curb behind the back of the elUsting curb between the face of the existing busway and the retaining wall for the Englewood LRT Station. The purpose of the splash curb is to provide a planting area wherein the City of Englewood will provide landscaping material between the splash curb and the face of the retaining wall. This Amendment will al so provide for the construction of a sidewalk at the Oxford Street LRT Station and the installation of certain amenities at the Englewood LRT Station. 1. Section Two of the Agreement is a mended by the add1t1on of the following : 2 . (k) Construction of a splash curb as an upgrade along the section of the busway immediately to the east of the retammg wall for the Englewood LRT Station as depicted on Exhibit A attached. RTD will pay to the City the cost of the construction for the splash curb which will be co nstructed by the City contractor for 693 lineal feet of splash curb at a cost of S32 .80 per linea l ~ flll2t.for a total of $22,731.00. The City s hall be solely r espon si ble for the construction of the splash curb and any related acti\;ties associated with the construction of the splash curb as s hown on Exhibit A . (]) Construction of a six foot wide sidewalk from the Oxford Street Station north to Mansfield on the west side of Windemere Street. approximately 850 linear feet. The City s hall be solely responsible for the design and construction of the sid ewalk and any related activi t ies associated with the co nstru ctio n of the sidewalk . (m) Purchase and placement of sixteen double bicycle lockers a nd three benches to be located adjacent to the Englewood LRT Station. The Ci t y s hall be respon si ble for the purchase and placement of the lockers a nd the be nches . Section Three of the Agreement is amended by the addition of the following : The RTD will pay the cost of construction of a splash curb :i.long the west s ide of the c urb and gutter adjacent to the Englewood LRT Station retaining wall as shown on Exhibit A at a cost of $22 . 731 . The City will provide RTD with copies of actual contractor invoices s howing the cost of construction. The City will mvoice RTD for this amount. The RTD will pay for the construction of a sidewalk from the Oxford Street LRT Station north to Mansfield. on the west side of Windemere Street. 11pproxi.mately 850 lmear feet . at a cost of $26,000. The City will provide RTD with copies of actual contractor invoices s howing the cost of construction. The City will invoice RTD for this amount .. I • 0 • • • • .. • -.. The RTD will pay for the sixteen double bicycle lockers at a cost of$ 11,480 and RTD will pay for the three benches at a cost of $994.00 each, for a total cost of $2 ,982.00. The City will invoice RTD for these amounts . The City affirms that it has sufficient funds budgeted and appropriated in the year 2000 to complete and to pay for all of the foregoing. Wherefore, the parties have made this Amendment effective the date first written above . REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT .C2/74"~ Clarence W . Marsella, General Manager APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM FOR THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT _-; I L By :---~---------.......,'--'~-'-! _______ _ Marla . Lien . Associate Counsel CITY OF ENGLEWOOD By:--------------- Thomas J . Burns. Mayor ATIEST: Loucrishia A. Ellis . City Clerk • I ) I • 0 • • • \:.../. •. , .... ' ,. ' " • .. • • '.~~u.- / /I ; ' fr ~ .c;, ·..., .~ 6PL~ff a./;R..B A'S J>e~,~cD ,~/J-rA&t>lA-N oli f!(c:A- • I I· 0 • ... • - \ I • 0 • t--:.\' .. .,_ • -.. COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Date Agenda Item September 1 7, 2001 11 a ii Subject Third amendment to the Intergove rnmental Agreem ent w ith RTD INITIATED BY STAFF SOURCE City Manager's Office Michael Flah erty, Assistant City Manager COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION The City entered into an intergovermental agreem ent with the Regional Transportation District o n January 6, 1997 for participation by RTD in the rede ve lopm ent of CityCenter Englewood and fo r conveya nce of a transit easement by RTD at the si te . On Jul , 19, 1999, a iirst dmendment to this intergove rnmental agreement w as approved increasing financial participation b y RTD in the project. A seco nd amendatory agreement was approved in Jul :woo auth o ri zi ng reimb urs em ent to th e Environmental Foundation fo r installation of fencing at City Center Englewood on behalf o f RTD RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends council approval of a Bill for an Ordinance to approve a third amendment to the IGA for reimbursement in the amount of $26 ,000 to the City of Englewood and $3 7,193 to the Englewood Environmental Foundation for work performed by the City and EEF on behalf of RTD. BACKGOUND Last October th e Englewood Environmental Fo undati o n, sought and recei ve d in fo rmal approv al from RTD to co nstru ct a sp lash c urb along the west sid e of the c urb a gutter adjacent to the Englewood Light Rail Station . The sp las h c urb will allow ve gatati o n to be pl anted against the retaining wall at the station. RTD has ag re ed to rei mburse EEF for the actual costs of this co nstru ction , $22 ,73 1, in lieu of pa ying fo r p aintin g of th e retaining wall . With th e agreement of RTD , the Englewo o d En vironm ental Foundation has purchased and install ed six tee n bicycle lockers adjacent to the Light Rail station at a cos t of $11,480 at th e request of RTD . This cos t wi ll be reimbursed b RTD . The Eng lewo od Envi ro nm ental Fo undation has , at th e req uest of RTD , install ed three additional bus ben hes adja cen t to RTD bus stops at City Center Englewood dt a cos t of $2982 . RTD will reimb urs e this ost. All o f this work , w hi ch is n ow completed, has been paid by EEF through the CityCenter project budget and RTD is prepa red to rei mburse the City pending approval of the amendatory agreement. In discussions with RTD earlier this year, it was determined that a sidewalk extension along the wes t side of Windemere Street was desirable for the safety of RTD users of the Oxford Light Rail Station . The City designed and willadminister this extension and RTD has agreed to pay the cost of construction totalling $26,000. The Ci ty has contracted for completion of this work, which will be completed this ye ar. 0 I • 0 - • • • ,.): .•· .. .. :·.'"' • -.. FINANCIAL IMPACT The Englew ood En vironmental Foundation will be reimbursed $37,193 for work completed at City Center Englewood and the City of Englewoo d will be reimbursed $26 ,000 for the work to be co mpleted adjacent to the Oxford Station . LIST OF ATIACHMENTS Bill for an Ordinance Proposed agreement • ..: D I· 0 32X • •,. ... • -.. COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Date Agenda Item Subject September 1 7, 2001 11 Ci Brown & Caldwell Phase 2 Engineering Contract INITIATED BY STAFF SOURCE Littleton/Englewood Supervisory Committee Stewart H . Fonda , Utilities Director COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION Approval of the Planning and Capacity Assessment Study and the Predesign Project. RECOMMENDED ACTION The recommended action is approval by motion of Amendment 1 of the Phas e 2 Engineering Contract with Brown & Caldwell Engineers for engineering and design of the Phas e 2 expansion of the Littleton/Englewood WWfP in the amount of $5,950,364.00 BACKGROUND, ANALYSIS, AND ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED The Littleton/Englewood WWfP has a current treatment capacity of 36.3 million gallons per day (mgd) and 63,000 pounds per da y of organic matter. Two primary factors have been identified that will require expansion of the present facility: 1) higher than anticipated population growth in the facility's service area and; 2) the regulatory requirement to remove nitrate from the plant effluent. These two factors and the need for expansion were presented to both Littleton and Englewood city c ouncils at a study session in ovember 1999. A planning and capacity assessment project was authorized as a result of the study session and Brown & Caldwell completed the project at the end of 2000. The results of the project were presented to both councils at a study session in February 2001. Brown & Caldwell recommended in c reasi ng plant capacity to a nominal 50 mgd and discussed the need for nitrate removal that ma y re sult from the ongoing nitrate Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL ) study. Results of the TMDL are an ticipated sometime this summer. A pre-design project was completed to identify specific plant components needed to expand th e facility to th e recommended capacity and include de-nitrification (nitrate removal) systems . The pre-des ign project also included the identification of the regulatory work required to obtain approval from the Water Quality Control Division and the Denver Regional Council of Governments, the 208 planning agency in the Denver area. As part of the pre-design project, a preliminary estimate of project costs was developed. The findings and recommendations of the Pre-design Projec t have been completed and th e engineering design stage of the Phase 2 project can begin . The scope of work includes comprehensive engineering services for project design, coordination with other agencies, and bid period services. -. • I· 0 - • • • .I • • A draft of the engineering contract with Brown & Caldwell is attached. The project design will cost $5,950,364.00. This work is anticipated to take approximately two years. The design work is scheduled to begin early fall of 2001 with construction bidding is anticipated for late summer 2003. FINANCIAL IMPACT The cost of the Phase 2 Engineering Project is $5,950,364.00, is a capital cost and will be split 50/50 with the City of Littleton . Funds to begin the project are included in the 2001 budget. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Brown & Caldwell Agreement for Engineering Services for Phase 2 Expansion • ,. ) I· 0 32 • , .. I • '. r , ! 1 L; l ~. ,4. • ,. • - AMENDMENT I TO .. AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEE I CITIES OF LITTLETON AND ENGLEWOOD AJ~l) BROWN AND CALDWELL FOR PHASE 2 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS .. THIS AMENDMENT NO . I to the Agreement , made and entered into on this __ day of ____ ., 2001, by and between the joint venture entity comprised of the Cities of Littleton and Englewood, Colorado, herein collectively referred to as "Owner," and Brown and Caldwell, Inc .. authorized to provide engineering services in Colorado , hereinafter referred to as "Engineer": WITNESSETH : WHEREAS , the Cities of Littleton and Englewood have entered into a joint use agreement which describes each City's respective rights in and responsibilities for the ownership and operation of the Littleton/Englewood Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) pursuant to which agreements and contracts may be administered by Englewood on behalf of both Cities ; and WHEREAS, Owner and Engineer entered into an Agreement on March 29, 2001 , to provide professional engineering services in connection with implementation of Phase 2 of the Facilities Expansion, herein referred to as the "Project"; and WHEREAS , the Owner, after considering the Eng ineer 's request made to the WWTP Supervisory Committee on August 16 ... 2001 has determined to reimburse the Engineer for the required services performed under the terms and conditions set forth hereafter: NOW , THEREFORE, Owner and Engineer agree to amend the Agreement as follows : I. SCOPE OF ENGINEERING SERVICES The services required are listed in Exhibit B-1 . SCOPE OF PLANNED ENGINEERING SERVICES , PHASE 2 DESIGN. II. COMPENSATION Compensation for services described above shall be in the lump sum of $5 ,950,364 .00. Payment will be as specified in Article VI "Compensation" of the Agreement . _ ............ 1-. ·-~ - Amendment I August 7, 2001 Page I of2 I· 0 .. I , l . J • ----,,..-,· • ..... , ... .. . _., • • Ill. CHOICE OF LAW/JURISDICTION Rev ise the second sentence of that paragraph to read as follows: "Jurisdiction of litigation arising from the Agreement shall be in an Arapahoe County Court of Competent Jurisdiction." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Engineer and the Owner do hereby execute this Amendment J to the Agreement. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD By Title Date BROWN AND CALDWELL, INC. By Title Date Amendment I August 7, 200 I Page 2 of2 .. . ' . .. I· 0 2 I • • 'I r- 1·, . , I t.J 0 • .. • -' EXHIBIT B-1 SCOPE OF PLANNED ENGINEERING SERVICES PHASE 2 DESIGN (AMENDMENT 1) The following is a summary scope of services for the final design of Littleton/Englewood Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Project, Phase 2. This information is supplemented in detail by information contained in Appendix A , "Drawing List/Engineering Design Fees" . ,• I· 0 • • • • ·,· • - EXHIBITB-1 SCOPE OF PLANNED ENGINEERING SERVICES -PHASE 2 Stage 2 -Program Development Stage 3 -Engineering and Design Stage 4 -Bid Period Services The scope of work includes comprehensive engineering services for project design and bid period services for the facilities described in this Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement. The scope of work for the Phase 2 project is based on recommendations of the Stage 1 Pre-design findings dated August 2001 . Article 1 -Program Development Engineer shall prepare reports required by state and local regulatory and planning agencies. The Site Application is included in the Pre-design contract, Stage 2 Program Development scope, thus not detailed in Amendment I . A Utility Plan is not included in this scope. This stage includes the following specific tasks to be performed by Brown and Caldwell : Task 101 Coordioadon witb Regulatory & Funding Agencies. Engineer will prepare documentation required for review by regulatory & funding agencies. Activities to be performed under this task include: a. b . Coordination with Englewood Fire Department to develop building occupancy classifications, site access for emergency vehicles, and interpretation of national and local fire code requirements. Submit scaled project plans and specifications to the Englewood Building Deparunent and respond to review comments. Upon acceptance of the reviewed contract documents, issue two sets of final plans and specifications with seal and signature of a registered Professional Engineer or registered Professional Architect to the Building Dcparunent. c. Submit 1 set of project plans and specifications to the CDPHE. Calculation notebooks will be sent if requested. Coordinate and respond to questions or concerns the dcparunent may have. Task 102 Value Engineering Support. Engineer shall provide technical support and coordination for a value engineering (VE) study of the Dcnitrification Process to be conducted by • Exhibit B-1 August 8, 2001 Page 1 of 20 I . 0 l J • • ' . .. • • • an ind ependent third party and funded separatel y b y the Owner. This VE will take place at approximatel y the 30% design point for the denitrification system . Brown and Caldwell shall provide the following services : a. Assemble and print (7) copies of re view materials related to the Denitrification Process including project schedule, plant monitoring data, key correspondence documenting design development, construction cost data, equipment manufacturer's cost quotations, technical specifications and engineered drawings developed to date . b. Present an oral summary of project development and key design decisions to the independent VE team and provide oral clarification or elaboration on the basis of design . c. Attend up to (2) coordination meetings between VE team, Owner, and design team . d. Evaluate design cost impact, schedule impact, functionality, and operational reliability of VE team recommendations. e. Review draft VE report and prepare written responses to VE team recommendations for incorporation into the final VE report . Task 103 Stormwater Construction Permit. Prepare a Colorado General Permit Notice of Intent (NOi) and submit to CDPHE for review and approval. Prepare a stormwater management plan (SWMP) to prevent contamination of surface waters by erosion, sediment, or other pollutants during project construction. The SWMP shall provide a narrative description of drainage area affected by construction activities, surface water bodies, significant materials exposed to stonnwater, method of on-site storage or disposal , materials loading and access areas, location and description of existing structural and non-structural control measures to reduce pollutants. The plan will include pollution risk identification and assessment, preventive maintenance procedures, and proposed best management practices during construction. In addition, a general Stormwater Construction protocol will be generated for the plant site. This document will be used for construction projects and detail necessary measures to be taken for stonnwater control. It will also be included in the specifications as a guide for contractors to follow . Task 104 Geotecbnical Investigation. Exploratory borings shall be drilled at the location of each major new structure to be constructed under the Phase 2 project. Subsurface samples shall be collected at 5-foot intervals and at changes in soil type over the boring profile. Groundwater levels will be recorded during drilling and 24 hours after drilling. Representative soil samples shall be tested to classify each material encountered and identify structural and engineering properties. Laboratory testing shall include moisture content, sieve analysis, dry unit weight, Atterberg limits and unconfined compressive strength. Two piezometer borings will be left in place to measure subsequent groundwater levels. Exhibit B-1 August 8, 2001 Page 2 of20 .... ) I • 0 - • • • • ·,, .. • -' This work will be subcontracted to a Geotechnical firm who shall prepare a formal geotechnical report including description of drilling , logging, and sampling activities, laboratory testing program , site plan showing location of existing facilities and boring locations , and logs of exploration borings . The report will include a discussion of subsurface conditions, recommended soil bearing capacities, anticipated total and differential settlement, lateral soil loads, groundwater permeability and dewatering requirements, and use of on-site soils for various fill conditions . The report will also recommend foundation systems for each structure with an explanation of the advantages of the selected system. Task 105 Engineer's Opinion of CosL A detailed opinion of construction costs will be prepared based on 90-percent design completion level docwnents. This cost opinion shall include a summary of costs for each of the major process divisions or project elements. The summary categories shall be subdivided into smaller elements sufficient to provide a reasonable estimate of project cost under competitive bidding conditions. The cost opinion shall represent probable construction costs for the project based on published, historical cost data. The cost opinion shall not be construed as a guarantee that actual construction contract price will be below the estimated amount. References for the cost data sources used to prepare the cost opinion shall be included. Task 106 Landscape Architecture. The landscape architecture design and plans, provided by others, shall be incorporated into the Engineer's final design package. Engineer shall provide a site layout and civil drawings to the Landscape Architect. Brown and Caldwell is not liable for any conflicts, changes or damages resulting from the landscape design. Tuk 107 CAD Standard Cbaa1es. In addition to new drawing and base drawing development, all old base drawings (CAD files) used in the Phase IA and Phase 18 designs will be reworked to meet current Brown and Caldwell layering and CAD Standards. Partial CAD files from previous designs will be merged to create one base file for all facilities constructed or modified for the Phase 2 design. All new bases will be developed in the current plant coordinate system and all "reused" CAD files from the previous designs will be converted to the current plant coordinate system. An aerial photograph with digital mapping will be completed by an independent firm. This will be coordinated with the plant staff to locate specific points on the site for mapping. Article 2 -Engineering and Desiga Services Design services will include preparation of engineered plans, technical specifications, and contract documents for the Phase 2 project elements defined in Stage I Pre-design. Design services include work in the major architectural and engineering disciplines required to provide complete and functional systems and facilities for each of the project elements defined in this scope of work. Engineered systems designed under this stage of the work include sitework; hydraulics; architectural elements; structures; treatment system processes; mechanical systems; heating, ventilation, and cooling systems; electrical system; instrumentation; and process controls. Specific services include space planning for buildings and structures, development of Exhibit 8-1 August 8, 2001 Page 3 of 20 I • 0 - • • • • '. • -~ hori zonta l and vertical sur;ey controls , drainage and grading , development of design criteri a, performance of engineering analysis and design calculations . sizing and layout of equipment including verification of critical dimensions , piping , and construction details at an appropriate scale to clearly communicate contract requirements , coordination of engineering systems to minimize potential conflicts during construction and verification of compliance with applicable national and local building codes. Other specific Article 2 design tasks to be performed by the Engineer include the followin g: Project Management. Develop and maintain project schedule, assign and supervise project staff, monitor work budgets, provide general contract administration, and prepare monthl y invoices . Administration of subconsultant work, guidance of technical direction, project planning. and coordination of quality assurance activities are also included in this task . This task includes project management services during Article I Program Development, Article 2 Engineering and Design Services and Article 4 Bid Period Services . Engineer shall provide a monthly status report to Owner briefly summarizing progress during the previous month, budget status and schedule status . The status report would also identify proposed modifications to the project scope, along with the design and construction cost impact of the proposed modifications. No design work will be undertaken on proposed modifications until authorized by the Supervisory Committee. Key issues requiring Owner action or direction would also be included in the monthly status report . Project Documentation. The Engineer shall maintain a comprehensive project notebook and calculation notebook . All technical memoranda and pertinent design information shall be routinely incorporated into the notebook. One copy of the updated notebook shall be submitted to the Owner and updated on a monthly basis for review during project development. Upon completion of project plans and specifications, one final copy of the project calculation notebook shall be submitted to the Owner for future reference . Progress Meetings. Coordination and project development meetings will be held between Engineer and Owner throughout the course of the Project. This task includes preparation for and attendance at meetings planned to occur generally once per month . The number of attendees and frequency of meetings will vary depending on status of the Project . Engineer shall prepare and distribute written progress meeting summaries to all attendees and the project notebook . Supervisory Meetings. A representative from Brown and Caldwell will attend each monthly Supervisory meeting. The representative will be either the Project Manager, Principal in Charge, Vice President or a combination thereo( The purpose is to report the necessary project information as detailed above to the Committee. A total of 25 monthly meetings are incorporated in the Project Management budget. Other representatives may accompany the Project Manager on occasion to help convey important issues. Quality Assurance. Senior technical advisors will provide periodic assistance and review during development of process diagrams, control descriptions, and detailed engineered drawing and Exhibit B·l August 8, 2001 Page 4 of20 • I • 0 • • ..., -. • I· • - specifications . General confonnance to industry standards , good engineering practice, and proper application of technology will be assessed throughout project development. Technical memoranda will be prepared summarizing results of milestone reviews and key project decisions. Copies of these technical memoranda 's will be incorporated in the Engineers and Owners project notebook. Coordination and review of the contract documents with the owner will occur around the 30 % & 60 % design completion level. Comments from this meeting will be recorded and incorporated . A coordination check of the Phase 2 Project contract documents will be performed at the 90-percent design completion level. Work depicted in the documents for various design disciplines will be reviewed to ensure that the plans and specifications are clear, consistent, and constructible. Design conflicts will be identified and corrected. Simultaneously with the coordination check, 3 copies of the drawings shall be provided to the Owner for review. The design will be finalized based on the coordination check and 90-percent design review comments from the Owner. Contract Documents. Final engineered plans. specifications, and contract documents for Phase 2 Project shall be prepared following the coordination check. Engineered plans shall be organized by construction disciplines including process diagrams, architectural, structural, mechanical, HV AC, electrical and instrumentation divisions. Specifications shall be prepared in the Engineer's standard modified Construction Specification Institute fonnat. A list of the anticipated drawings is shown in Appendix A, Figure 4, of this scope of work. The drawing list is preliminary and is intended for general use and a starting point. Drawing totals will be added and subtracted depending on the final design for each of the process areas. The scope of work or changes shall not be based on the actual drawing count, but on the following description of the scope as detailed in Tasks 301 through 314. Article 2 engineering and design services will be provided for the following tasks listed under Article 3 Project Description. Article 3. Project description The following tasks present a description of the proposed facilities and modifications to existing facilities for improving the UE WWTP and expanding the capacity to 50 mgd (max month flow). The facility improvements were established in the Phase 2 Pre-design report completed in August 2001 with program development, detailed design and bidding services to follow this planning report. To accommodate service area growth, regulatory requirements and infrastructure improvements, the Owner desires to proceed with design and bidding of a construction contract for the Phase 2 facilities. Treatment plant components included under this design phase are described in the following paragraphs . • Exhibit 8-1 August 8, 2001 Page 5 of 20 I • 0 - ,-, • J • , .. ,-·, ~ .. . -· .. .. • - Task 301 Headworks. To expand the headworks capacity for Phase 2 , the following modifications will be included in the design : • • • Modify the existing flume for a peak flow of a I 00 mgd . Add the fourth mechanically-cleaned bar screen in the remaining slot . Install the sixth influent pump in the remaining slot . • Construction of an additional 54" pipe and grit effiuent channel improvements to convey flow to the new primary clarifiers. • Improvements to or replacement of the screenings processing system to minimize clogging of the sluicing system, unplanned shutdowns, a wet waste product that likely will not pass a paint filter test, and safety issues for operating personnel. A range of solutions/alternatives were preliminarily evaluated and they include relocation of grinding equipment to improve sluicing reliability to new conveying systems and dewatering equipment to address all concerns, including disposal requirements . During final design, the optimum alternative will be selected and designed with due consideration of technical issues and staff concerns . • Design improvements to the grit basins and related systems are necessary . A number of alternatives were evaluated during the preliminary design phase . The selection of the new system will be made during final design. • The electrical equipment is undersized for future requirements. To improve code compliance and to replace aging equipment and consolidate electrical gear, a new electrical building will be included in the design . r:~1_1_1_01Flal.dll: Exhibit 8-1 August 8, 2001 Page6 of20 . ' ' 0 ) I· 0 3 - ~ I I L ; • • .. • -' A summary of the process and infrastructure improvements (including modifying the building to comply with National Fire Protection Act [NFPA] 820) are listed in the Table below: Proposed Headwork Improvements Headworks Innuent Flumes BarScreem Screenlnp Proceatn1 S)'ltem laftuent Pumps ritBaim rtt hlllpl rit Cycloaalclulfflen lafrutnlchlre Electrtcal PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Future Capacity 5emsd(mH-tb) Number 2 (remove small linen) Capacity, each SOmgd Number I new Capacity, each 29mgd Option to be selected during SO mgd capacity design Number I new Capacity, each 20mgd Existing system to be modified. 2 existing Capacity (hydraulic), each SOmgd Number 2new Capacity, each 100gpm Number 3new Capacity, each 250gpm • Structural repairs • Replace existing chain & flight mechanisms and grit washing and dewatering system • ,. . New separate electrical room Exhibit 8-1 August 8, 2001 Page 7 of20 0 I • 0 32 I • • i l I L. • .. • -.. Task 302 Primary Clarification. Based on an anal ysis of the primary treatment alternatives, Brown and Caldwell will design the installation an additional fifth clarifier and sixth clarifier and related support facilities. A summary of the process and infrastructure improvements is presented in the Improvements Table below : Improvements to tbe Primary Clariflcadon System Primary Clarlften Primary Sludce Pump1 Primary Sludce Grlnden Primary Clarlfter Splitter Bo:1 Iafraatructure E:1iltlac Primary Clariften Primary Sllldp Pump Stattoe PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Future Capacity so mad Number 2 additional. circular Diamelcr 105 ft Surface Area 8,660 ftl SOR 1200 gpd/ft' Number 4 rq,lacmenlS/2 additional Capacity, each 480gpm Horsepower, each 20 Number 2 additional Capacity, each 800gpm Horsepower, each 5 Number I additional • 4 clarifier scraper mechanisms and collection equipment • Floor modifications to improve sludge removal • Minor concrete repair and coating of the clarifier • Replacement of baffles and effluent weir plates • Replacement of the PSPS roof and repair of PSPS wall damage • Repair of PSPS IUDDel ceilings • Minor rq,air and sealing of PSPS tunnel level floor • Vehicle Access Improvements Exhibit B-1 August 8, 2001 Page 8 of20 ' ' . . ' I • 0 I l-l • .: • • .. • -' Task 303 Trickling Filten. Design and additional trickling filter and two additional feed pumps to bring system capacity up to the required 50 mgd for Phase 2. A summary of the process and infrastructure improvements is presented in the Improvements Table below: Improvements to die Trickling Filten PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Tricklln1 Fllten Future Capacity Number Media Tvoc Diameter Media Depth Surface Area, each Media Volume Weflina Rate Organic Loading Rate Trlc:kllq Filter Pamp Stlltloa Tvne Number Capacity, each Drive Speed Honeoower lafrutractare Sky-walks between TF's so fflld I additional Crosstlow. 30 ft'/ft' 105 ft 16 ft 8,660 ft' 138,560 ft' 1.9 gpm/ft' 145 lb CBOD/1000 ft'/d Vertical column, non-clog 2 additional 24mgd Variable 200 Exhibit B-1 August 8, 2001 Page 9 of20 I· 0 xi - • • • • .. • -... Task 304 Solids Contact. Design the expansion to the solids contact tank (SCT) process to treat 50 mgd. This will involve changing the operating process by adding a reaeration tank prior to the SCT. The existing blower capacity will be expanded to a finn capacity of 32,200 standard cubic feet per minute (scfm). The existing four smaller blowers will be replaced with three 8,000 scfm blowers. Modifications to the blower building, piping and control are needed. A summary of the process and infrastructure improvements is presented in the Improvements Table below: Rec:ommnded Improvements to the Solids Contact System PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Rneradoll Tua Capadty so mad Number I additional Length 108 ft Width 49 ft Liquid Depth 12 ft Volume, each 0.4795 MG Blowen Number 3new Type Multi-stage centrifugal Capacity' total 8000 scfm Horsepower, each 600 lllfraltnlctue Diffuser replacement in Tanks 4 and 5 Add walkways to SCTs 4 and 5 Electrial Replace existing motor control censen ( MCCs) Exhibit 8-l August 8, 2001 Page 10 of20 .. .,, I· 0 - • • -. • ·-~ ... .. • - Task 305 Secondary Clarifien. Design improvements to increase the capacity of the Secondary Clarification system to 50 mgd. Design will include two new secondary clarifiers. The new secondary clarifiers will be designed with flat bottoms, Tow-Bro type mechanisms and flocculation wells similar to the Phase 1 B installation. The new clarifiers will be approximately 20 feet deep . The RBS and waste biological sludge (WBS) pumps and will be replaced. To further improve RBS control, a pumping system with pumps dedicated to each clarifier will be included. Vertical turbine solids handling (VTSH) pumps would be mounted on a new structural slab constructed on the existing RBS wetwell. A total of seven new pumps will be provided. In addition, the existing clarifier mechanisms will be replaced and the sloping floors made flat . A summary of the selected process alternatives and infrastructure improvements to the secondary clarifiers is presented in the Improvements Table below : lmprovemeatl to the Secondary Clariflcadon System PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Secondary Clartflen Future Capacity Number Diameter Sidewater deplb Average SOR Bottoms Sludge collection mechanism RBS Pumps Number Capacity, each Wetwell Infrastructure WBS Pwnps (4 @ 38S gpm) Replace Mechanisms !O med 2 additional 135 ft Existing approx. 14 ft/new 20 650 gpd/ft2 !\ew flat/existing flat 1'ew clarifiers: Tow-Bro type Existing clarifiers: Tow-Bro type ji new i mgd (rated) \ .SH pwnp suction • Exhibit B-1 August 8 , 2001 Page 11 of20 "< I· 0 I ' . -. • • ·- '- ' ;,r - . • • - Tas include the k 306 Nit rify in g T rick lin g Fi lte rs. No addi ti o nal NTF ·s a re needed . Desi gn will addi ti o n of th e fifth pump at the pump sta ti on. A s ummary of the process and infrastruc ture improvements are presented in th e nt s Table belo\ : lmproveme lmprove m en ts to th e NTF System PRO POSED II\IP ROVEME~TS NTF Feed Pu mps T ype Vemcal colu mn ~umbe r I.A.d d S"' pump C aparny. each 24 mgd Dnve speed \'anable Ho rsepower ln frastr uctur Install sky-walks between NTF's install power actuators Replace NTF I & 2 media Tas k 307 DAFT. One addi tio nal D AFT and related a ppunenances will be designed to gd fo r Phase 2 . Bonom sludge pumps wi ll be replaced with positive di s plac e me nt difications will be made to the routing of the bonom sludge for ro ut ing to head work s . o digesters . Flow meteri ng will be placed on th e bonom s lud ge line . meet 50 m pumps . Mo DAFTs , o r t A s ummary of the process and infrastructure improvements a re pres ented in th e nts Table below : Jmproveme lmprove me nts to the Di ssol ved A ir Flotation T hickening System SUMMARY IM PR OVEMENTS DAFTs Ful ur e Ca pa ci ty 50 mg d Number I addmonal D1ame1er 145 fl jt,590 ft ' Thickened SI ud ge Pumps '.! ad ditional Pro gressive cavity 1 ·o gpm 10 Bollom Sludg e Pumps I addmonal. 3 re pl acem ent Pos mve dis placem ent 60gpm 3 Pre ss uriza 1io n Pumps umber 3 additiona l Type C entrifuga l C apac ity , each 7 50 gpm Ho rsepower, eac h 40 lnfras truc tu r e Repl ace DAFT bonom sludge pumps Modify rounng o f bonom sludge pumps Modify mixing box P 1Dau1GEN\Llllrn1 ~-·-•-•_01.-.... Exhi bit 8 -1 August 8 , 2001 Page 12 o f 20 I • 0 .., • • • • • -... Task 308 Digesters. To meet the Phase 2 design flow of 50 mgd with one unit out of service, Brown and Caldwell will design one additional digester (No. 5). The digester building will be expanded to accommodate the ancillary equipment needed for Digester 5. Digester I will be converted to a submerged fixed digester by replacing the cover. The design will include a sludge screening process to remove deleterious materials from the Centrate. A summary of the process and infrastructure improvements are presented in the Improvements Table below : Improvements to the Anaerobic Digesters PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Anaerobic Dl1esten Future Capacity 50mgd Number 1 additional Diameter 80 ft Sidewater depth 29 ft Normal liquid volume 145,800 ft ' Cover jSubmergcd-fixed Submerged Filed Cover Dt1. I Replace Dig 1 cover !Submerged fixed Mb:ing Equipment Nos. I and 5 Type Center draft tube propeller Capacity, each 21.000 gpm Horsepower, each 25 Number (per digester) 2 Type Screw centrifugal Capacity. each 2.500 gpm Horsepower, each 20 lnfrastructun Replace existing heat exchangers (HEX ) Nos. 2 and 4 with tube and shell HEX. Centrate Sludge Screening Replace Cleaver Brooks boiler. Digester exterior masonry block will be repaired or replaced Task 309 Cogeneration. During design the alternative with Xcel Energy will be explored and evaluated with assistance from the plant staff. Because of the uncertainty of the selection, the design includes IO miscellaneous drawings and 5 electrical for the unknown scope. For budgeting purposes, one new engine was included in the Phase 2 project total with the assumption the alternative with Xcel Energy will result in a cost equal or less then that for adding another engine generator. If the selection of the alternatives require no modifications to the existing system, no engineering or drawings will be needed . The cost for these 15 drawings total ,.S9 7 ,000 , and this amount will be refunded to the owner or negotiated with an additional scope ·change . Gas storage improvements are not included in this design as no money was budgeted for Phase 2 because of the need for this system is uncertain. Recent control modifications indicate the system has maintained a higher output thus diminishing the need to utilize a gas storage system. • Exhibit 8-1 August 8, 2001 Page 13 of 20 I • 0 - • ... • .. • • Task 310 Dewatering and Centrate Recycle. One additional sludge storage hopper of approximately 90 cubic yards will be added to provide two days or more of dewatered sludge storage. One additional truck bay and automated scale will be included in the design to reduce odors and provide overnight truck parking. Polymer system expansion for the installation of the third DAFT and will be included in the design . Additionally, modifications will be designed for the centrate holding tank and pump station to provide the capability to continuously return flow through the plant, rather than in slug ·1oads, which adversely affects the NTFs. A summary of the process improvements is presented below in the Improvements Table below: Proposed Improvements to the Dewateri•I aad Centrate System PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS S1ud1e Hoppen Number I additional Type Silo Diameter 14 ft to in Hei&J!t I 7 ft Volume 90yd' rrruck Loadlns Bay Number I additional Scale Low-profile Polymer Modlftcadolll To be determined ~entrate Equalization ... Improvements to existiaa llllk. Number Divide 1111k into 2 sec:tiom S1orqe c:apacity 320,000pl lmprovcmcms Sluqe removal (Trac:Vac) Centrate Pump1 Pump and c:ontrol modific:alioas are necessary . Number No additional Capac:ity T o be detmniDcd Type Centrifugal ,-~1_1_1_01F1a1.a Exhibit 8-1 August 8, 2001 Page 14 of20 , . . ' 0 I· 0 - • • I• ,:.. I • I J • .. • - Task 311 Site Work. Brown and Caldwell will address the following items for inclusion in the Phase 2 design . • Effluent metering station. The final details of the effluent metering station will be established during final design. For the purposes of this contract, the proposed installation will include a building, effluent flume and instrumentation, two automatic samplers and provisions for supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA). • Outfall improvements. Access will be modified to provide safer access to the effluent sampling location. • Remove all stractura at old Englewood plant site. The demolition of the Englewood plant site will be included in the design . • Headworks -fill depression. The area will be filled and re-sodded . • Gate coatrola. A card access monitoring system will be designed for construction to enable operators to identify those entering . Surveillance cameras will be considered during final design. • Potable and non-potable water piping. Review of the major water distribution piping with the plant staff will be completed and replacement of required distribution piping will be included in the design. • Centrate piping modification. To mitigate ammonia slugs to the secondary treatment process a new length of piping will be designed to permit discharge of centrate to the DAFTs. • Secondary clarifier algae cleaning system. An algae removal system is being piloted by plant staff on one clarifier. The retrofit of the remaining four clarifiers and two new clarifiers (six total) will be included in Brown and Caldwell's design. • BuUdlng lnfrutnctllre lmprovemeats. Plant staff hired TechniScan to conduct an architectural review of plant buildings. TechniScan identified a number of deficiencies. Design for correcting these deficiencies will be included in the design . Exhibit 8-1 August 8, 2001 Page 15 of 20 ,. . ' I· • 2 • '-· J ' 1 :J ..., • .. • -.. A summary of the items and their associated costs ts presented m the following Improvements Table. Sitework and Infrastructure Improvements SITEWORK AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS Effluent meterina station Building, flwne. instrumentation. automatic samplers, SCADA Outfall Improvements Provide safe access to sampling location Enpwood demolition Demolish all tnalewood WWTP structures Headworks Fill and re-sod deDression area where ponding is occurring Gate controls Provide entry cud access to increase security at the plant Non-potable water DlDlftl Replace a1illa and com>ded 3W piping Centrate plDiftl modification Provide alternate routina of emirate Secondary c:larlOer al&ae Potential retrofit on existing and construction of new algae cleaning system, c:leanln1 system pending results of pilot testing Bulldl111 lnfrutructure Correcting issues reported by T ecbniscan lmprovemeatl Tuk 312 Denitriflcation. A combined denitrification alternative including recycling nitrified effluent back to the hcadworks by gravity and Denitrification Filters was selected as the best alternative to meet the new Nitrate limits and has the flexibility for lower future nitrate limits . The Phase 2, design wiH include a dcnitrification process that will produce a final effluent limit of 20 mg/I nitrate or less . This process will include both a gravity line from the NTFs to the hcadworks with flow control and dcnitrification filters . The denitrification filters will take a portion of the NTF effluent and treat this to a very low nitrate concentration. This dcnitrified effluent will be blended back into the plant effluent to produce an effluent quality of 20 mg/I nitrate. At this present time the actual nitrate limit which the TMDL will include is unknown. Consequently a design of 20 mg/I was selected for the design criteria. In addition to the dcnitrification filters, a methanol storage facility will be included . Coordination and approvals with regulatory agencies for this facility is included in Phase 2 . Buildings to house the filters, pump station, support systems, site work and architectural details are also included. Exhibit 8-1 August 8, 2001 Page 16 of20 .. . .. 0 I· 0 •• • • • • - Task 313 Odor Control and HVAC. The Littleto n/Englewood WWTP currently operates several process systems that are either paniall y or totally dedicated to odor control. The Phase 2 expansion of the LIE WWTP will require additional odor control and HVAC facilities . The following details the odor control improvements to be included in the Phase 2 design : Trickling f'Uters. The proposed odor control facilities for the trickling filters would include two scrubber systems, consisting of a minimum of three absorption vessels, duty and spare recirculation pumps, standby draft fans, and duty and spare chemical metering pumps, new water softener , and an expanded or new chemical storage facility . The mist tower and high pressure blowers would be removed from service. with the possibility of being reused . Primary Clarifien. The odor control measure for phase 2 includes installing a partial cover system over just the launders to capture the foul air at the primaries and convey it to the new trickling filter . Manhole 12 is also a significant odor source and this air will also be conveyed to the new trickling filter Solids Contact Tanks. Process changes to the secondary system may increase the odor level from this process, requiring at least partial covering, ventilation, and treattnent of air from this source . For Phase 2, the channels and the reaeration basin #I will be covered, and the off-gas treated. This air stream will be treated with a new bulk media biofiltration system located near the SCTs . Other Modifications. Phase 2 will incorporate one additional DAFf and an additional truck bay at the dewatering building. Phase 2 design modifications include to the fan systems conveying foul air to the NTFs, as well as new NTF induced draft fans. A number of HY AC and odor modifications will be required as a result of Phase 2 improvements. Increasing the number of large pump and blower motors, as well as variable frequency drives in motor control centers, raises the heat load to these areas. Potential ventilation modifications will be required as detailed in the Improvements Table. During design, the extent of these facility modifications will be evaluated and detailed. HV AC and Odor Control Modification Improvements Area Headworks Pump Molor Room HW Gril Truck Bay Tunnel Venlilallon Blower bulldln1 D11es1er MCC NTFMCC NewHWMCC Various New Areas Dewaterin& Bulhlln1 Modlficallon Add small evaporative cooling system Provide local exhaust hood and system to exhaust diesel fumes Evaluate system and test , provide supply air bandier and add ducting to eliminate dead spots Improve ventilation and add evaporative cooling Provide dedicated air conditioning system to nonh MCC Replace existing system with new. higher capacity unit. Provide new AC system as required (Consider relocating existing to NTF MCC) Provide venulation to pump rooms. etc . as required Expand HVAC system for the additional truck bay Exhibit B-1 August 8, 2001 Page 17 of 20 • I • 0 ·1 • • • .. .. • • • Task 314 Major Electrical Power Distribution and Control Modifications . In addition to e lectrical and control modifications required for process changes and additions, Engineer shall also design the modifications listed below to the electric a l and control systems. The modifications are required to replace equipment at the end of its life-cycle , improve operational reliabilit y, or pro vide redundancy for critical processes . A summary of the Electrical & Control Impro vements are presented in the tables below . Proposed Improvements to Electrical System \ r l 1 I qt11p111t 1, Site PSGI PSG2 SWGRI SWGR2 Headworks Elecmcal Room VFDs Pnmanes MCC RBS/WB S SWGRI MCC NTF SWGR VFDs DAFT SWGR Digesters MCC SA& SB Elecmcal System Service & Sup. Elecmcal System Controls Modlftcadoa1 ,, I I "' Site Network Headworks ACCO! Pnmanes ACC02 Solids Contact ACC0 3 Ex istmg Large Blowers NTF ACCOS DAFT ACC04 Dewatering Polymer Centrate PS Drain Pumps Rerum Pumps Non -Pot PS PLC Service & Sup. OCC PLC \lodilu.alrnn Site Capacity Survey for power distribution . Re view ex istmg ductbanlc capacities and plan for ultimate buildout. Replace Provide Power Metenng Replace & Relocate to new Headworks Electrical Room In corporate Automatic Transfer Controls Replace & Relocate . poss ibly to new D igesters Electri cal Room. Incorporate Automatic Transfer Controls Relocate to the new elecmcal room . Replace equipment where required Replace 7 Rob1 con VFDs Modify for dua l electncal feed. In corporate Automatic Transfer Controls. Modify fo r dua l e le ctncal fee d . Incorporate Automatic Transfer Controls . Replace Modi fy for dual electncal feed . Incorporate Automatic Transfer Control s. Replace 3 Robicon VFDs Modi fy for dual electrical feed . Incorporate Automatic Transfer Contro ls. Add a tie breaker Prov ide a new e lectrical room with dual feed . Incorporate Automanc Transfer Controls . Refeed from new SWGR2 . Provide UPS backup for critical loads . Incorporate Automatic Transfer Controls. '1,,ddil .Jlltlll Review Site Network and incorporate or plan future requirements . Replace with new hot-standby PLC Provide Sludge Blanket Level Monitoring Replace Modify for bener load control Provide automanc sampling for NTFs Provide arm rotanon proxuruty sensors Remove Dmnfecllon related 1/0 Provide arm rotation proxuruty sensors Provide addinonal monnonng of the Polymer Batch and Dry Feed systems Prov ide automanc dram pump control Provide vanable speed control Provide new PL C cabme1 Remo,•e the e x1snng graphic panel and provide a large flat display Make prons1ons for replacmg the existing FMT Human-Machine-Interface • Exhibit 8-1 August 8 , 2001 Page 18 of 20 ) I • 0 - • • • • '• • - Article 4 -Bid Period Services Engineer shall pro vide assistance to Owner for award o f a construction contract by means of competiti ve bidding procedures. The Phase 2 Pre-design contract stated the Bid Period Services Stage 4 will be amended by Exhibit 8-2 . This exhibit 8-1 includes this scope of work with no Exhibit 8-2 represented . The Engineer shall prepare project description and invitation to bid and assist owner in publishing public notices . The Engineer shall also distribute contract documents to prospective bidders, manage document deposits, and respond to information requests from prospective bidders. Addenda to the plans and specifications will be prepared , if necessary . Engineer shall attend the bid opening, analyze the results, and prepare a letter to the Owner summarizing the bid analysis. The letter will provide a recommendation for award of the contract. Engineer shall perform the following tasks : Task 401 Advertise and Distribute Documents. Prepare an advertisement describing the project and availability of bidding documents . Publish this advenisement in up to 4 local newspapers and construction industry periodicals. Print 60 sets of contract documents and distribute contract documents to prospective bidders and construction industry plan rooms. The Engineer will charge and retain an appropriate amount , nonrefundable fee for each complete set of half-size drawings and specifications to defray printing costs. Task 402 Prebld Conference. Assist Owner to schedule and conduct a prebid conference. At prebid conference, present scope of project, contract requirements, bidding procedures, subcontract and minority business panicipation goals, contractor qualification certification, licenses and construction permit issues, procurement and labor regulations, geotechnical information, project schedule and construction sequencing, bid evaluation, and contract award procedures. Provide a tour of the site to prospective bidders. Identify and clarify bidder's questions and answer them by addendum . Distribute a prebid conference attendance list to all planholders. Task 403 Contract AddendL Respond to oral , telephone, or facsimile questions received from bidders concerning clarifications to drawings and specifications. Maintain a written record of all oral or telephone discussions with prospective bidders and suppliers conducted during the bid period. Comments, clarifications, or discussions which significantly affect interpretation of contract requirements shall be issued by formal addenda. Prepare up to 3 addenda for revisions to drawings and specifications for issue prior to bid date . Task 404 Bid Opening and Bid Evaluation. Attend bid opening and assist Owner to open and publicly read the bids, verify bids are complete and announce apparent low bidder. Provide assistance to the Owner in evaluating bid proposals, prepare a bid evaluation letter repon, and advise the Owner regarding contract award. Engineer shall present results of the bid evaluation at the regular monthly meetings of the Littleton/Englewood Supervisory Committee. Task 405 Contnct Award . Attend up to 2 meetings with the Owner and CDPHE representatives during the "authority to award" process. Upon authorization by Owner, prepare a • Exhibit 8-1 August 8, 2001 Page 19 of 20 0 I • 0 - I . I l . r. l- 1.J il • • • • .. • -.. Notice of Award for Owner's signature and transmit by certified mail to successful bidder. Return bid bonds to all other bidders . Receive, review, and verify completeness of preaward submittals, Equal Opportunity Certifications, Minority and Women Business Enterprise participation, insurance certificates, and performance and payment bonds. Exhibit B-1 August 8, 2001 Page 20of20 ,• I· 0 3 I - • I' ,.- ...J • • } ~ ... • - APPENDIX A ORA WING LIST/ ENGINEERING DESIGN FEES PHASE 2 CONTRACT The following spreadsheet provides a summary of the anticipated design work under the Phase 2 contract. The information is broken out as follows : -Figure I : Discipline Summary -Figure 2 : Project Management/ General Office/ CAD Summary -Figure 3 : General Activities -Figure 4 : Facilities Drawing List .. I . 0 • • • PROJECT SUMMARY INFORMATION Summa,y Sy Dlsclpllne: I ., it j \~ "~\_j/t-~~ • l.. . . ; • .• f ~; 1' '1,. ' j' . , .... ; Discipline '• •. ' I , f"" '~ ]"!; . ( i ... ,_ ..:. .:· "1. • ,. .• .. \?:~ft t: .. i . -i<.,• './:.;·,11:, Code General G Archi tectu ral A Civil C Structural s Mechanica l M HVAC H Process p Electrical E Instrumentation & Control (l&C) I 1'111jud M,111Juu111u111/G u11u1 a l Ollh :u/C /lllll Special Activities Spec . Development & Processing (4) Interdisciplinary/QC Reviews Bid Period Services 8/8/014 :08 PM 0 • Littleton/Englewood Phase 2 Plant Expansion Project Appendix A, Figure 1 -Discipline Summary Labor ODC Graphi cs Engineering Draftin g Reproduction Communi ca tions $1,000 $71 0 $78 $52 $2.500 $1 ,000 $1 20 $8 0 $3 ,400 $1 ,17 0 $12 6 $84 $3 ,200 $1 ,550 $18 6 $124 $3 ,600 $1 ,825 $195 $130 $3 ,200 $1 .650 $1 95 $130 $3,200 $1 ,650 $195 $130 $2,300 $1 ,040 $132 $88 $2.600 $1 ,140 $195 $130 Total Total Cosl/ Number of Add Cost/Drawinn Drawinns Catenories N//1 N//1 $1 ,:111.1111!, (Sou Hu111u ~) N/A NI A $283 ,00 4 (See Figure 3) $250 790 $197 ,500 $238 790 $188 ,020 $160 790 $126,400 Total Add .Cost= $2.106 ,809 0 Cost/ Number of To tal Cos t ' Computer Drawing Drawm gs D1s c1pline $260 $2,1 00 85 S 178 r,o n $4 00 $4 ,100 33 St 35 .300 $4 20 $5.200 50 S260 .000 $620 $5.6 80 14 6 $8 29 .280 $650 $6,400 164 $1,049.600 $650 $5 ,825 26 St 5t.450 $650 $5 .825 45 S262 125 $440 $4 ,000 22 1 $88 4.000 $600 $4 ,665 20 $93,300 Total Drawings = 790 Total Drawing Cos t = $3 ,843 .555 Total Drawing Cost Total Additional Cost Total Contract Cost $3 ,843,555 i2, 106,809 $5,950 .364 Brown and Caldwell • • • I• ~-'' . ' L-~-2----A.F-2·-111--1 OlllcelCAD s.-,y ·-· ..... • • • ' -· l..ff.-• . ...., --· ... , ... ... ~ ""· .. ---- r--..... ,..-..,..n_ ....................... .............. c:..... ............... c:e.,, C.-.. ......... ICMN. -~ ----·-----..... .... ... ... .. .. .. ... .. DIii. NICM. lll'f,• IUITOTM...... 411 ........ lllt.•IUIIOfM. ... I 17.JID I _ ............. ...... an ........... ,ea.,. ............... c:... c...... ......... ,c... -~ --..................... ·----OIICo ' .. "" 1135 1124 JOO "'° ,00 ... C 56.500 I .. ooo ' -· -.. ... ... ,00 .. "'° .. ... zoo ... ... "' ... ... .. '" -'" IUOCI I a .JOO s ...... " I I .. " .. " " I Dlll. ...... llllf.•-'IOTM.NGUIII M 132 DN ....... lll'f.·-IOTIIU'U L.... •!!! !~_!~ ! 1!,l20 I I .. I M • ,- '°'.::=i I to0.2': I ... n12 u, •wo II .,4.120 II t.J..,. CMI . ... 110 1 "' .. 0 ESTIMATlO STAFF HOURS AND FEES CMI -ltw Sf. Slrvct. S1Nct. Sr .119ffl ... ctl ..... . ... lt191 . Enctt, Ene,. fner . E,_., 110 1 .... II!, 11 25 1 101 1 125 1 10 1 .. D .. I · I · I · I · I l,J:,'1'7 rJIA7il ~:r.w. -~ 1~ ' .... .. .. "' '" "' .. .. "' "' .. "' "' .. " " ' 10 ll!i ,0 . .. ... "' ' El.Cl Omo , .. ~ 115 t7S 27S 115 H5 115 215 H!I '1!> 11V 11 Pt I tU1S I U ,J15 I 14.115 I :N,l7!o I H .17!1 I 2812S I H ,67 !1 I Ml2S I 16110 ... ·~--1~·:-:- ,,. 11011 I " 40I I t.NO I .... ,,. "' 11011 l "* II I ..,, 2.0001 -· 10001 ·----.ta..,.:.&; .. ~L ' 113 Ut Ill llJ 22S 15,W I 41.J15 I tlilal I 2t 12S I 22115 I " •!IIIO I ~ ... 7118t0 I ' 7'<J .. , 161.10 0 • • • . t '--~-,-----_ ... ,_, ___ _ _ _, ..... .._,.......,..n .... .. __ _ _....,.....c.,,,,. .................. c-.. C.... ........ IC:.... .... _ ---------..... I .... __ . ---· .... • • • L-..• ---.... C 0 • • ... • ... ... --._ ... .. .. ._ ·-· ... .. 20 --... / 0 50 I 2SOOOOO I 100000 I !IOOOO I 1!i0000 UOO I 1,100 I .. 2~ I ~-~· .,; .... w .. .. ,, . ,,. .. . .. .. .. ... ,.. ... ... ... I uoooo I 200000 I soooo I sooooo DIO.MICM.llln,•118TOTM.IIICUII 111 • lrl ,n ..., ,,. . 11~1 '" . .... . .... .... 41:ZS I 000. . ... .. ,., 1'il!)() ..... .. ... 110900 ti H O •21 ISO """ S2S70 29000 I ,0 000 ..._...,,, .• , .• lllefOTIII. ... I 11.• I •.ta0 I 2090 l '!:.U ~--I .In I t'2.5IO I 2500 I JOOO I 500 I $,GOO NH I t 074.002 I 10000 I , .... ON -~-........ .i,, .... -; ____ , __ ..__ DID MICM.11111'.·-TOTM.,_ I . . . ... '"''·r-,ar:'---""i:::: 11 11.:: I • .. • .. tJ ,. I.JOO I at I m I •• I ~-·- -J2'I .. ,,. a,oo I itltO II tOtd I 111,itO • IOOOD I 1.00000 I !0000 I t ,00000 C O C 0 ND I t 000 I 500 I t .000 -· -. ··--· ,;. .. ,n Na JellD II •-I UDO I 1.900 " . .... ... '"" .. . .... ". ,,, .. .. . "" • • . .... ,,. . 1 224 ... ,, .. ,_ I et.1111 ~1,.t r' ""' )000 ,uo ,, .. 'IJO 11 ,to , ... . .... 812• ]246 1000 1000 I •111 \ l, l •,..ii.: t ,Jt1 ,IH 0 • • -------------------?""'--":""""-----------------~---------.------- • l e t I } ' lillrl-: -- • .. PD T•toz ·--. • POT ... 101 --I • PDT ... tOI --I 10 PDT•tOI --.. .. POT• 10I ~ I .. -_._....., ..... lLE~ ,._ " . -VIIIDIIIIIF.-. JlE-,ec 2,.....,, ..... 1 • ,_ '" ., lll/014 OI PM • • -.. ~~ Phne 2 Planl Expansion Projec:I "-"<II• A, Figure 3 • Spoclal Actlvlllff .. Etlimailedtbn OttMtt'Oirec1Co.tl l l l ( l I I 8 l l I I I I I 10 20 • .. ' 50000 ' 20000 ' .. "' "' .. ' 50000 ' 20000 ' 10 I 10000 ' 20000 ' " ' 20000 ' 1 .. .. I .. ' 1,00000 ' 50000 ' . I ' 1.00000 ' ,0000 ' .. ' " .. ' -" .,. .. ~' 5.10000 I t ,70000 ' • 0 j l j ! i u l ! ! ~ •. I ! ! .. ~ 50000 •2e , '6060 00 • 1100 00 I "'"' ·, 20000 , .. ' 20 200 00 • 00000 • 21 ,ooc.- 20000 .. ' 6060 00 • 50000 • 7 .,...., 20,00000 .. ' 502,00 I 2010000 I 2!>:'1• 00 20000 ,,. ' lol ,760 00 • 1 10000 • )tl ,r.;:11.0 20000 ., ' • "° 00 ' 1 •0000 • !iA:'QOO '°' ' ll080 00 11 7AIOOOO I •O 080 t~ 15 ,00000 10, ' 21 9,1000 I 1!>00000 I lb e,o uo ' ' ' ' ' 2•.000 00 ,.. ' 21960 00 • 24 000 00 ' 5 1 96000 eo .soo oo ~-I 211 ,104 00 ' 11900 00 ' 2eJ oo. oo 0 Brown and Caldwell - Cateaarv t._, I: .. II II ' II ~ ,I 'I ,, n ~ N ., I ., If CateQorv ........ ~ .......... t~· -4~ .... ·?~~·.t,-~:-·· II • 1: II II • II II II u 8/8/01111 PM • • '•, • - Littleton/Englewood Phase 2 Plant Expansion Project Appendix A. Figure 4 -Facilities Drawing List Disc Drawina # Title G Locat1onMcin1tv Map/Site Plan/Key Map G DrawmQ List G DrawmQ List G Draw,nQ List G Site Plan G Site Survey Conlrol Plan G Plant Flow Diagram G Site Boring Plan G Site Bonng Logs 1 G Site Bonng Logs 2 G Site Bonng Loos 3 G Desian Data G Des,an Data G Symbols and Abbreviations G Civil LeQend G General Structural Notes G Architectural Legend G Structural Legend 1 G Structural Leaend 2 G Mechanical Leaend 1 G Mechanica l Leoend 2 G Code Analysis and Notes G Process Schematic & Design Data Summary G P1p1na Process & Instrumentation L,.,,..nd G Process Instrumentation Svmbols and Abbreviations G General HVAC Notes G Plant Hydraulic Profile 1 G Plant Hydraulic Profile 2 G Instrumentation SvmbOls & Abbreviations G Instrumentation Svmbols G Electncal Svmbols & Abbreviations G Electncal Symbols Disc Draw,nQ I Title A Electncal Budding -Elevations A Electncal Bu11d1ng . Roof Plan H Electncal Bu1la1ng • HVAC Schematic H Electncal Building • HVAC Plan H Electncal Building • HVAC Sections and Details H Headworl<s -Roof HVAC Ptan Upper Level H Headworl<s -Roof HVAC Plan Operat1na Level H Headworl<s • Roof HVAC Plan Ground Level H Headworl<s -HVAC Schematic M Influent Channel -Demol~1on Plan M Influent Channel -Plan M Influent Channel -Sections M Headworl<s -Demot1t1on Plan 1 M Headworl<s -Demolition Plan 2 M Headworl<s -Demol1t1on Photos 1 M Headworl<s -Demoht1on Photos 2 M Headworl<s -La-r Level Plan M Headworl<s -Operating Level Plan M Headworl<s -Grade Level Plan • I • 0 Brown and Caldwell - c a,eo orv II II .. II II I: J1 II 1: 'I JI Categorv ~~, ;-,~~·~~t!:;'. ~-"e:f· -"-· 1: 1: 1: 1: • 1: 1: • 8/8/011 '11 PM • • ... • - Littleton/Englewood Phase 2 Plant Expansion Project Appendix A , Figure• -Facil ities Drawing List Disc DrawinQ # Tille M Headworks -Upper Level Plan M Headworks -Sections and Det ails -1 M Headwor1<s • Sections and De1a1ls -2 M Gnt Tank s -Demoht1on Plan M Grrt Tanks • Lowe r Plan M Grrt Tanks -Upper Plan M Gnt Tanks -Sections and Details M Gnt Tanks . Sections and Details s Influent Channel . Plan s Influent Channel • Sections s Grrt Tanks -Lower Plan s Grit Tanks -Upper Plan s Gnt Tanks • Sections and Details -1 s Grrt Tanks . Secuons ano Details . 2 s Electnca l Bu1id1na -Foundation Plan s Electncal Build1na · Grade Level Plan s Electncal Bu1101ng -Roof Plan s Electncal Bu11d1ng . Sections and Details . 1 s Electncal Bu1ld ma -Secuons and Details -2 Oise Drawing• Trtle A Primary Sludge Pumomg St atton -Roof Replacement Plan and Details H Primarv Sludae Pump1na St at ion -CIOor and HVAC H Primarv Sludae Pump,na Station -CIOor and HVAC M Primary Oistnbut1on Bo x -Plan and Sections M Pnmary Clanfiers 1 ~ -Demohtton Ptan M Pnm ary Clanf,ers 1-6 -General Arrangement M Pnmarv Ctanfers 1 -4 -Tv p1cal Plan M Pnmarv Cl anfers 1 -4 -T yp1 cal Section M Prima rv Clanfers 1-4 -Sections and Details 1 M Primary Clanfers 1 ~ -Sections and Details 2 M Pnmary Clanfers 5-6 • Typical Plan M Primary Clanfers 5-6. Typical Section M Pnmarv Clanfers 5-6 • Sections and Details M Primarv Clanfers 5-6 -Sections and Details M Pnmarv Sludae Pump1no Slat1on -Oemolrt1on • Lower Level Plan M Primarv Sludae Pump1na Station -Lower Level Plan M Pnmarv Sludae Pump1na Station • Sections and Details s Pnmarv Clanfiers 1-4 -Plan s Pnmary Clanfiers 1 -4 -Sections and Details s Pnmary Clanters 5-6 -Typical Plan s Pnmary Clanfers 5-6 . Typical Section s Primary Clanfers 5-6 . Sections and Details s Pnmary Clanfers 5-6 -Sections and Details s Primary Sludge Pumping Station • Upper Level Plan s Pnmary Sludge Pumping Station • Lower Level Plan s Pnmary Sludge Pumping Station -Site Plan Brown and Caldwell • 0 ) I • 0 C ategory ~rtcldlna Flllara " II " II II " n d n Categorv ~;~ . ··;r--~~p: . • . ... ! ... - i I I • I I • I .. I 8/81011 11 PM • • - Littleton/Englewood Phase 2 Plant Expans ,on ProJect Appendi• A. Figure 4 • Facilities OraW1ng List Disc Drawmo # Title A Tnckhna Filter 3 -Elevat1c r5 M Trickhno filter Pumpmo S:2:c--Plan M Tnckhna filter Pumpmo S12:o--Sections M Trickhna Filter 3 -Plan M Tncithno Filter 3 -Sect1o ns :,~ Details 1 M Tricithna Fitter 3 -Sections = ~= Deta,Js 2 M Tricitlina Fitter 3 -Dome s Tnckhno Fiher 3 -Founcat c.-::i tan and Sections s TncklinQ Filter 3 -Upper F'a.-ano Sect ions s Tnckling Filter 3 -Lower L :-·,,e.1 P lan and Sections s Tricithng Fitter 3 -Wall Plar ;. Sections s Tnckhng Filter 3 -Honzonta. -enoon Layout s Tncithng Filter 3 -Sections a-.o Details 1 s Trickling Fitter 3 -Sections =nc Details 2 s Tricithna Fitters 1-3 -Wal•wav Plan s Tncithna Fitters 1-3 -Walk'#2v Sections and Details 1 s Tncktmq Fitters 1-3 -Wa1kwcv Sections and Details 2 Dtsc Draw.no# Title A Solids Contact Tank · Ele=-cal Room -Elevations & Roofina M Sohds Contact Tanks -Gere--al Arranoment M Solids Contact Tank 1 · Ce-->01n1on Plan M Solids Contact Tank 2 . c.,..-,010,on Plan M Solids Contact Tank Char,.... Moa1fica11ons M Solids Contad Tank 1 -Rea·at,on Plan M Solids Contad Tank 2 -Re:--a11on Plan M SolMls Contact Tank 1 • S'e"':Jons ana Details M Solids Contad Tank 2 -Se-::_,ons and Details M Sohos Contad Tanh ,.5 -::.emoht1on Plan M Sob0& Contact Tanl<s ,.5 • :,11user Reolacement Plan M Solids Contad Tani< 6 -P'an M S0ltd1 Contact Tank 6 -S~1ons ana Details M Blower BulidlflQ -Demoh1lcr "Ian M Blower Bu11dlf1Q • Plan M Blower Building -Sections s-.o Details 1 M Blower Bu11d1ng • Sections a-.o Details 2 M Secondary Sluooe Pumo,rc S1 a~on • Demolition -East Plan M Secondarv Sluoae Pumo,rc Stauon -Demolltton -West Plan M Secondarv Siu~ Pumc1rc Station -Oemohtlon -Photos 1 M Secondarv S•...,.. Pumo,rc Station -DemoJijion • Photos 2 M Secondarv Siu""" Pumolf"C S1 a1,on -Lower Level Plan M Secondarv SI"""" Pumo,rc Sta11on -Sections and Details • East M Secondarv SJun"" Pumc,r,: Station -Sections and Details -West M Secondarv Clanfiers 1 -7 -::--e,,.,ral Arranaement M Secondarv Cianfiers 1-5 --.,o.cal Demoht1on Plan M Secondarv Clanfiers 1-5 • =.an M Secondarv Clanfiers 1 -5 • •'DtCAI Section M Secondarv Clanfiers 1 -5 • ~ons and Detads 1 M Secondarv Clanfiers 1-5 -~,ans ano Detm 2 M Secondarv Clanfiers 6 anc --Pian M Secondarv Clanfiers 6 anc --T vpical SectlOn M Secondarv Clanfiers 6 anc --Sections and Detada M RBS Wetwell • Plan Brown and Caldwell I • 0 C ategory o,sc M s s I s s s s /1 s s s s I s s s s I s s s s I s s s s s Cateaorv Dtsc ,-1na,-~ .. "'~'·"''.:,· M ..... ~ M M ' M s 1 s s s C ategory Disc ...,,,. . ..,... A o.a" • ~ . .. . •M --r· H • M M I M M M M • I M M M s I s s 81810 11 11 PM • • • - Littleton/Englewood Phase 2 Plant E,pansion Project Appendix A . Figure, -Facilities Drawing L ist Dr awing# Titl e RBS W erwell -Section s and Detail s Solids Contact Tank 1 -Plan Sheet Solids ContaC1 Tank 1 -See1 1ons ana Details Solids ContaC1 Tank 1 -See1 1ons and Details Solids ConlaC1 Tank 2 -Plan Sections and Details Solids ContaC1 Tank 4 -5 -W alkways Plan Solids Contae1 Tank 4-5 -Walkwavs See1 1ons and Details Solids ContaC1 Tank Channel Mod1kat1ons Solids Contact Tank Channel Moa1ficat1ons Solids ContaC1 Tank 6 -Lower Plan Solids Contact Tank 6 -Upper Solids Contact Tank 6 -See11ons and Details 1 Solids ContaC1 Tank 6 -SeC11ons and Details 2 Solids Contact Tank -Etee1nca1 Room -Plan Solids ContaC1 Tank -Etee1ncal Room -See11on Solids ContaC1 Tank -Etee1ncal Room -Details Blower Building -Mod1ficat1ons -Plan Blower Budding -Mod1ficat1ons -Sections and Details Secondary Clanfiers 6 and 7 -Plan Secondarv Clanfiers 6 ana 7 -See11ons ana Details -1 Secondarv Clanfiers 6 and 7 -See11ons and Details -2 Secondarv Clanfters 6 and 7 -See11ons and Details -3 RBS Wetwell -Upper and Lower Plan Views RBS Wetwell -See11ons and Details Drawing• Title NTF Pumping Station • Plan. See11ons and Details NTF Service Bu11d1na -Plan . Sections and Deta,ls NTF Service Bu11d1na -Plan . See11ons and Details Centrate EQualizaton Tank -Modifications -Secuons and Details NTF 1-3 -Walkway Add1hons -Plan NTF 1-3 -Walkway Addrt1ons -Sections and Details Centrate Equal12aton Tank -Modificahons -Lower Level Plan Centrate EQualizaton Tank -MOdifications -Sections and Details Drawing• Title DAFT -Elevations DAFT • Tunnel HVAC Modrficat,ons DAFT • Oemolijoon Plan 1 -North Gallerv Level DAFT -Oemolijoon Plan 2 -South Gallerv Level DAFT -Bottom Plan DAFT -North Gallerv Plan DAFT -South Gallerv Plan DAFT -South Top Plan DAFT • Tunnel Plan DAFT -T unnet Oipong Modoficahons 1 DAFT • Tunnel Dion! Modoficatoons 2 DAFT • Foundation Plan DAFT -T anl< Plan DAFT -See1oons and Details 0 Brown and Caldwell • I I • 0 " Categ ory ~ " II ' 11 II n . ·11 H I I rt II I I I - • I 11 • I ~ 8/8/011 ·11 PM -• • ... • • ... Littleton/Englewood Phase 2 Plant Expansio n Project Appendia: A, Figure• -Facilities Drawing L ist Disc Drawing• Title A D1Qe ster 5 -Eleva ti ons 1 A DtQ ester 5 . Elevat,ons 2 A D,Qester 5 -Elevations 3 A O,Qester 5 -Elevations 4 A D•Qeste r 5 -Elevations 5 A DrQester 5 -Roof Plan A Di gester 5 -Roof Detatls H DOQester 5 -HVAC -Schema ccs H Digester 5 -HVAC -Galle ry _ a ,el . Plan H Digester 5 • HVAC • Ground .evel Plan H Digester 5 -HVAC · Roof Plar H Dtaester 5 -HVAC -Sections m o Details 1 H D,aester 5 -HVAC -Sections sno Details 2 M D,aesters 1-4 • Demolition • Ga llery Level M DiQesters 1-4 • Demolition . G ->und Level M DiQesters 1 -4 -Demolition · ? "'Ot os 1 M D,gesters 1 -4 . Demolition • F "'>Ot os 2 M DtQester 1 -Demolition -Cove,r M Dioesters 1 -4 • Gallery Le ver • 'lor1h Plan M D,Qesters 1-4 . Gallery Leve, • South Plan M DiQesters 1 -4 · Ground Level · 'lor1h Plan M 01gesters 1-4 -Ground Leve· -So uth Plan M O,gesters 1 -4 -Sections ano :-etalls 1 M o,aesters 1 ~ -Sections ano _,eta11s 2 M D,aesters 3 • Dome Modrficanons M D,aester 1 · Cover Replacerre,,t Plan M Digester 1 -Cover Replacerr ~·11 • Sections and Details 1 M Digester 1 • Cover Replacerre,,t • Sections and Details 2 M Dioester 1 • Cover Replacerre,,t • Sections and Details 3 M Dioester 5 • Gallerv Level • P•an M D,aester 5 • Ground Level . F'an M DtQester 5 • Roof Plan M Digester 5 • Cover Plan M Digester 5 -Sections and Oe ~a l!s 1 M Dioester 5 . Sections and De :a,ls 2 M 01aester 5 -Sections and De !a11s 3 M Jtnester 5 -Sections and Oe ta11S • s DiQester 1 • Cover Replacereent -Plan s DiQester 1 -Cover Replaceme,,t • Sections and Detatls 1 s Digester 1 • Cover Replace~, • Sections and Details 2 s Digester 1 • Draft Tube Ado,oon • Structural Details 1 s Digester 1 • Draft Tube Add men • Structural Details 2 s Digester 5 • F oundat,on Plan • Area 1 s Digester 5 • F oundat,on Plan -"-rea 2 s Digester 5 • Foundation Plan -"-rea 3 s Digester 5. Gallery Level P'a n. Area 1 s Digester 5 . Gallery Level P•an . Area 2 s Digester 5 • Gallery Level P•an • Area 3 s Dioester 5 . Ground Level P•a n . Area 1 s Dioester 5 . Ground Level Pla n -Area 2 s Dioester 5 • Ground Level Pia n • Area 3 s Dioester 5 • Roof Pian • Area • s Digester 5 • Roof Plan • Area 2 s Diaester 5 -Roof Plan • Area 3 s Digester 5 • Cover Plan . . A I • 0 Brown and Caldwell Calegory '., Cal=""' "~.i«<,,;;.'1'e!--·' ·~~ .. ··--•. ,,,,. •'•, ... ,.;_,· -:il! ·-.Ji:-a .. :i:.~-• -~ Caleoorv ~-1,:r~ ..... ~~-~ .... ,..,., .. -~-;,?•,c: ~ '. ' I I I • I I I I I I • I I 8/8/011 11 PM • • ,. • - Littleton/Englewood Phase 2 Plant Expansion Project Appendix A , Figure,. Facilities Drawing List Disc Drawma # T11l e s D1aester 5 -Sections and Details , s Dt0ester 5 -Sections ano Details 2 s D1oester 5 -Sections and Details 3 s D1oes1er 5 -Sections and De1a1 ls • Dtsc Drawina # Title M D1aes1er Complex -Cooeneral,on -Gallery Plan M Dioesu,, Complex -Coo,,nera11on -Ground Floor Plan M D1oes1er Complex -Cooenera11on . Roof Plan M D,gesler Complex -Coo,,nerat,on -Sections 1 M Digesler Complex -Cooenerat1on -Sect,ons 2 M D,gesler Complex • Cooenerat,on -Gas Slorage -Plan and Sections M Dioesler Complex • c-ra11on • De1a1ls 1 M D1aester Comptex -Cno.aneration -Details 2 M D1oes1er Complex -Coo,,nera1,on -De1a1ls 3 s D1oes1er Complex -Cooenera11on -Gas Sloraoe -Plan and Sections s Digester Complex -Cogenerat,on -See11ons and Details 1 s Oiaester Complex -Coaenerat,on -Sections and Details 2 Disc Drawir,g # Hie A Sludge Dewalenno Bu11d1na -Roof Plan A Sludoe Dewalerina Bu11d1na -Sections and Details H Centrate Tank -Plan. Sections and De1ails H HVAC Plan H HVAC Schemalic H HVAC Sections and Dela~• M Cen1ra1e Tank -Plan M Cenlrale Tank -Sections and De1a1ls M Pump Slation -Plan M Pump Stal,on -Sect,ons and Details M Sludae Dewa1enr,g Build1r,g -Polymer Svs1em -Demoltt,on Pholos M Sludge Dewalenno BUIiding -Polymer Syslem -Plan M Sludge Dewalenr,g Buildir,g -Polymer Syslem -lsomelncs M Sludge Dewalering Building -Demolrtion -Lower Level M Sludae Dewalenna Build1na -Demolttion -Upper Level M Sluaoe Dewal""""' Buildina -Lower Level Plan M Sludae Dewa1enna Buildina -U,_.r Level Plan M SI""''~ Dewa1enna Build1na -Sections and De1a1ls 1 M Sludae Dewalenna Buildina -Sect,ons and De1ails 2 M SI,.,_ Dewal""""' Buildina -u-Level Plan s SI,.,_ Scree....., Buildina s 51,...,. Saee"""' 5,......., s Centrate Tank -Plan s Centrate Tant -SeCIJana and Detaoll s s1,...,.0ewa......., •-.nn · Lower Level Plan s SIUCICle Dewai.nnn •-.n ·•-Level Plan s Siuda@ ·-· ..-,g · Founclal,on Plan s Sludm ·-~ ~ -SeCIJana and Deta~s, s Sludae Dewllenng Bl-.a · Sad,ons Ind Det1~1 2 • I • 0 - - CateQory II II I Category ,~;: ..... ~M-· ... ..-4•.);• ·"-,\i .,. ••• I . . -': .... 1. t. • .• ; d I • I K H I u d N u II I n u n II • 1: a II • n R - I I 818/011 '11 PM • • • - Uttleton/Englewood Phase 2 Plant Expansion Pro1ect Append i x A . Figure 4 . Facilities Drawing List Orsc Draw,ng # Title s Sludge Dewatenng Bu1 ld1ng • Secti ons and Details 3 s Sludge Dewatenng Build ing • Secti ons and Deta il s • Oise Draw,nQ # Title A Filter Bu11d1nQ • Lower Level Plan A Filter Bu11d1nQ • Intermed iate Level Plan A Filter Bu11d1ng . Upper Level Plan A Filter Bu11d1nQ -Roof Pla n A Filter Bu11d1ng -Reflected Ceiling Plan A F ,lter Butldeng • Stair 1 -Plans and Section A Filter Buoldma . Stair 2 and Elevator · Plans A Fitter Bulldma · Stair 2 ana E~vator -Plan and See1 1on A Foller Buoldona • Stair 3 • Plans A Filter BuoldlnQ -Stoor 3 • Sections A Foller Bu11d1ng • Elevation 1 A FIiter Building . Elevation 2 A Foller Bu11C1 1ng · Elevation 3 A F,tter Budd,na -Elevation, A Filter Bu11d1na • Wall Sections A Filter Building . Pan,al Elevations A Filter BuoldmQ • Plan • Nonh A Fitter Bu""'"" • Plan -South H Filter Buoldma . Effluent Filters . Upper Level Plan . Nonh H Filter Buoldona • Effluent Filters· Upper Level Plan • South H F,lter Bu11dma · Effluent Filters · Lower Level Plan • Nont, H Filter Bu11d1ng • Effluent F ilters · Lower Level Plan . South H Filter Bu11d1ng. Filter Influent Pumping Stauon . Pan1al Floor Plan H Filter Bu11d1na • Effluent Filters · Section M Filter Bu11d1na • Filter Influent Pump1na Station -Pian ano Equipment List M Filter Bu11C11na • Filter Influent Pump,na Station • Sections and Details M Filter Bu11d1na • Filter Influent Pump,na Station • Sections and Details M Effluent Filters • Plant Drain Pumping Station . Plans and Sections M Filter Building · Effluent Filters · General Arrangement and Equipment Lost M Filter Building -Effluent Filters · Top Plan M Filter Budding • Effluent Filters -Intermediate Plan M Filter Buoldona -Effluent Filters -Tvp1cal Bonam Plan M Filter Bu11d1na • Backwash and Waste Pipona • Intermediate Plan M Filter Buold ina -Final Effluent P,p,na and Filter Dra,n Svstem -Intermediate Plan M Filter Bu11d1na -Backwash Air P1p1na -Intermediate Plan M Filter Buoldina -Filter Waste Backwash Tank -Plan and Sections M Finer Building -Pope Gallery -Nonh End Pan,al Plan M Filter Building -Pipe Gallery -South End Pan,al Plan M Filter Building -Pipe Gallery -Sedion 1 M F ilter Building -Pipe Galierv • Section 2 M F ,ner Buildina -Pipe Galierv -Sedion 3 M Finer Building -Pipe Gallery • Sedion 4 M Finer Building • Pipe Gallery • Sedoon 5 s Fitter Building -Pile Pian -North s Fitter Building -Pile Plan -Sou1h s Foller Bui """ -Foundation Plan -North s Fitter Bu '"" -Foundation Plan -South s Fitter Bu, m -Intermediate Plan -North s FofterBu" '"" -lntermed11te Pian -South Brown and Ca- • I • 0 Category II II I: I! H ,, - 11 II " u II l Cat..,nn, ". ~,,. ~ ....... -.--.. , ··-..;·-~-"- II II 11 • II Cat""°"' • ·-~~~~i'. ' ..:.:. .: ::1v111119.-...'!!" .. ~!:J,t •. ~ -;_.., • II II - H II 8/8/011 11 PM • • • -' Littleton/Englewood Phase 2 Plant Expansion Project Appendix A, Figure 4 • Facilities Drawing List Dtsc Drawing # Title s F,iter Building • Upper Deck Plan -North s F ,her Bu,kling -Upper Deck Plan -South s F1her Building -Roof Plan -Nonh s F1her Bu1k11ng -Roof Plan -South s F ,her Bu1k11ng -Beam Pile Cap and Column Schedule s Filter Buik11ng -Sections and Details 1 s Fitter Bu1k11ng -SecttOns and Details 2 s Filter Butklma -Sections and Details 3 s F titer Butld1no -Sections and Details 4 s F titer Bulldina -Sectt0ns and Details 5 s FIiier Buoldina -Sectt0ns and Details 6 s Filler _...., -Sectt0n1 and Details 7 s FIiier Buoldina -SecttOns and Details 8 s F Iller Buoldina -Sections and Details 9 s FIiier Buold1n11 -Sections and Details 1 O s FIiier Buoldmg -Sections and Details 11 s FIiier Bulldina -Sections and Details 12 s FIiier ,..-...., -Sectt0ns and Details 13 s Fitter Buoldina -Sections and Details t 4 s Fitter Bu1k11ng -Sections and Details 15 s Fitter Butldln!l -SecttOnS and Details 16 s Fitter Butld,ng -Sectt0n1 and Details 17 s Fiher Bulld1no -Sectt0ns and Details 18 s F Iller Buoldma -Sections and Details 19 s F titer Butkl,ng -Sections and Details 20 s FIiter Building -Sections and Deta~s 21 s Fiher Build1no -Platdorm Fram,no at Fiher Influent Pumps -Pan1a1 Plan Disc n.-........, Trtle C Plan C Enlargea Plan I C Enlarged Plan 11 C Sections I C Sections II s Foundation Plan s Sections and Details s Sections and Details s Cariopy Plan. Sections and Details Disc Drawing# Title C Paving and Grading -Area 1 Plan C PaVlflQ and Grading -Area 2 Plan C Pavina and Grading -Alea 3 Plan C Pav,na and Grading -Alea 4 Plan C PaW1CJ and Grading -Alea 5 Plan C PaW1CJ and Grading -Alea 6 Plan C Pav,ng and Grading -Alea 7 Plan C Ya<d p......, Alea 1 C Ya<d Pininll Alea 2 Brown and Ca- • I • 0 - C ateoorv I I • • 8/8/01 I II PM • • • - Littleton/Englewood Phase 2 Plant Expans ion Pro1ec t Appendix A, Figure, -Facilities Drawing List o,sc Dra wmq # Tit le C Yard P1pinQ Area 3 C Yard P,pmQ Area 4 C Yara P1pino Area 5 C Yard P1p1nQ Area 6 C Yard P1p1nQ Area 7 C Yard P1p1ng Profiles and Detail s · Profiles for > 12" P1 p1no C Yard P1p1ng Profiles and Details -Profiles for> 12" P101no C Ya rd P1p1ng Profiles and Details -Profiles for > 12" P101no C Yara Piping Profiles and Detail s -Profiles for> 12· P1p1ng C Yard P 1p1ng Profiles and Detail s -Profi~s for > 12 .. P,pmg C Yard P1p1na Profiles an d Detail s · Profi~s tor > 12" P101ng C Yard P1p1na Profiles and Details -Profites for > 12" P1runa C Yard P1p1na Profiles and Oe ta 1is -Pro file s for > 12" Pi oma C Yard P ip1na Profiles for> 12· P 101nq C Yard P1pinQ Profiles for> 12" P101ng C Y ard P tpmg Profiles for > • 2 " P,o,ng C Yard Piping Profiles for> 12· P1p1ng C Yard Piping Profiles for > • 2" P101ng C Yard P1oina Profiles for > , r 0 10,no C Miscellaneous Ons 1te P1 010Q C Effluent Metenno Vau lt C Outfall Mooificauons C Demo Drawings Eng~wood Pl an t C Demo Drawmas Enalewooa ?l ant C Demo Drawinos Enolewooo Plant C Demo Drawinos Enolewooa Plant C Demo Drawings Englewooo Plant C M,scellaneous/Ada~1ona1 Metenng Vault Details C Plant lmaatton System P lan V "tew C Plant lmoat1on Svstem Plan Vte w C Plant lmQat 1on Svstem Seoons and Details C Miscellaneous On s1te P1c1no C Chemical Metenng Vau lt C Chemical Metenng Vau lt C Miscellaneous C M,scellaneous/Addrt1onal Metenno Vault Details • Title ) I • 0 • • Category P&IO'a • SCTs ' • • -... Littleton/Englewood Phase 2 Plant E,,pansoon Pro,ecl Appendix A. Figure 4 · Facilities Drawi ng Lisi Oise Draw,ng # p Blower Building -Large p Blower Bu11d1ng -Small p SCT -6 p SCT 1-5 p SCT Rearea11on 1 p SCT Reareat1on 2 p RBS -Pump1na p WBS -Pump1na Title .1;•nf1r-:..r .... ~! a.. p..,,._ •. •, P SC's-6&7 Cllltlas ~i-• .. ~-'~M---:pc---t-----+.:s"'c,:-·s--...,1,..,-5c-----------------------------il °"'f> '<°<:' ,..,,. -Dlll'T r;~!';}•!!#~-rt.~ • ;r. PIID'9;'DI..A• ill t --· Category .;..}~~· ..... 01 .,_ ,i. -....... 818/011 11 PM • P DAn3 -P"""""'Feed P DAFT 3 -Compressed Air ., .·.,.;-, ,· • P T ruc1< Scale .. ~ :i,.;~·~:.-t---:p::--i-----+.:p:-'7'_'---'=..;;..---------------------------ll P Pu""""" p n.n-,., 5 • ~- p p .-ier 5 • Gas p JtOeSter 5 -Trans fer p P&ID-Effluenl Fifters-Fifte< 1 p P&ID-Effluent Fitters-Finer 2 p P&ID-Effluent Fifters-Finer 3 p P&ID-Effluent Fifters-Filter 4 p P&ID-Effluent Fifters-Effluent Fifters-Waste Badlwash Storaae Tank p P&IO-Effluenl Fitters-Effluent Fifters-Fiher Gallen/ Dram Pumping Station p P&ID-Effluent Filters-Effluent Fifters-Fiher Badlwash Pumps p P&ID-Elftuent Fihers-Elftuent Fifters-Fifter Badlwash Blowers p P&ID-Elftuent Fifters-SeMce AK Svste<n -. p Bulk Sloram, • P&ID p Feed Pumps· 1A.1B . 2A and 28 -P&ID p Feed Pumps • 3A .3B · P&ID p DistnbulJOn Pooni -P&ID Dose Hie b.·. G Pa...., and Graaina Details 1 G Pa...., Ind Gr......, Delalla 2 G Standard Cov,1 Delalla 1 Brown and Catdwett • I • 0 - Cateoorv I • • 8/8/01111 PM • • ... • • Littleton/Englewood Phase 2 Plant E•pansion Project Appendi• A, Figure 4 . Facilities Drawing List 4 Disc Dr awmQ • Title G Standard C1v1 1 Details 2 G Common P1pe hne Deta il s G Common Pipeline Deta il s G Common Pipeline Detail s G Common Ptpehne Details G Common P1pehne Restraints G Slructural General Notes G Typical Slructural Details 1 G Typical Structural Details 2 G Typical Structural Details 3 G Tvoical Structural De1a1 ls 4 G Tvoical Structural Details 5 G T vpical Structural Delails 6 G Tvp,cal Structural Details 7 G T yp,cal Structural Detaots 8 G TVDICBI Structural Details 9 G T \IDICBI Structural De1a1ls 1 O G Tvoical Structural Delalls 11 G T wnor.al Structural Details 12 G Archrtectural S1anoard Details • G ArcMectural Slandard Details 2 G ArcMectural Slanoara Deta ils 3 G Arcllrtectural S1anoard Deta ils • G Arcllrtectural Standard Details 5 G Atcllrtectural Standard Details 6 G ArcMectural Standard Det11ls 7 G Arcllrtectural Standard Details a G Mechanical Delails · Pipe Gu l0e5 and Supper, Svstem TaDles G Mechanical Dela•• -Pipe Hancers G Mechanical Details -Stanaarc "'!a.-rs Structural Anac11m,mts G Mechanical Details -Ut1l11Y Staoons & Purae Unn Deta,is G Mecllanical Details -P1oe Pene:rat,ons G Mechanical Details -Dra1naoe :>etails and Cleanouts G Mechanical Standara Details G Mechanical Standara Detail s G HVAC Standard Deta •I 1 G HVAC Standard Details 2 G HVAC Standard Details 3 G HVAC StandaRI Details 4 G Standard Instrumentation Deta .. 1 G Standara Instrumentation Detaa 2 G Standard Instrumentation Deta.as 3 G StandaRI ln1trumenta11on Detaa , G StandaRI Instrumentation Deta ,os 5 G Electncal Standard Details 1 G Eleclrical Standard Details 2 G Electrical Standard Details 3 G Eleclrical StandaRI Details • G Electrical Standard Details 5 G Electncal Standard Details 6 " Electrical General Srte Plan ;.,ea 1 Eleclrical General Srte Plan .:-rea 2 • I • 0 Category ..___. l • • I 8 /8/011 11 PM • • ... • - Littleton/Englewood Phase 2 Plant Expansion Project Appendi1 A , Figure, -Facilities Drawing L ist Oise Drawing• Title E Electncal General SIie Plan Area 3 E Electrical General Site Plan Area 4 E Electncal General Sole Plan Area 5 E Electncal General Srte Plan Area 6 E Electncal General Sole Plan Area i E Electrical General Subs1a1 1on Plan 1 E Electrical General Subs1a11on Pla n 2 E Electrical General Subs1a11on Plan 3 E Electrical General Subs1a11on Plan • E Electncal General Subs1a11on Plan 5 E Electrical General Subs1a1 1on Plan 6 E Elearical General Subs1a11on Plan 7 E Elearical General Plant Po-r D 1s1nou1 1on Demo One-Li ne Diagram 1 E Electncal General Plant Power D1stnbut1on Demo One-Line D1aaram 2 E Electncal General Plant Po-r Dostnbutoon One-Lone Diagram 1 E Electncal General Plant Po-r D1s1nbut1on One-LJ ne Diaaram 2 E Electrical General Plant Power D1stnbu11on O ne-Lone Doaaram 3 E Electncal General Plant Po_, Dostnbutoon One-Lone Ooaqram • E Electncal General Plant Po_, D 1s1nbut1on One -Line Diagram 5 E Electncal General P lan t Po_, Dis1nbu11on One-Lone Diagram 6 E E~ncal General Plant Po wer D1stnbut1on One-Line 01aaram 7 E Eleancal General Spec,al Svstems Riser Do aQ ram 1 E Electrical General Spec,al Systems R iser Diagram 2 E Eleclrical General Dudbanl< Schedule 1 E Eledncal Geiwral Dudbanl< Schedule 2 E Eledncal Geiwral Dudban• Schedule 3 E Eledncal General Dudban• Schedule • E Eledncal General Duclbant< Schedule 5 E Eledncal General Lumma,re Schedule 1 E Eledncal Geiwral Lumona ore Schedule 2 E Eleancal General Mose Scnedules & De1aols 1 E Eledncal Geiwral Mose Scnedules & Details 2 E Electrical Effluenl Fillers -Power One-Line Diagram 1 E Eledncal Ellluenl FIiters -Power O ne-Lo ne D iagram 2 E Eledncal Effluent Fillers -ACC One-Lone DoaQram E Eleclncal Effluenl Fillers -Control DoaQram 1 E Eleclncal Effluenl Fillers -C ontrol DoaQram 2 E Eledncal Effluent Fillers -Control DiaQram 3 E Eledncal Ellluenl Fitters -Backwash Control Panel Control Diaaram 1 E Eleclrical Effluenl Filters -Backwash Control Panel Control Diaaram 2 E Eleancal Effluenl Filters -Backwash Control Panel Control Diaaram 3 E Eleclrical Effluenl Filters -Panel Schedules E Eleancal Effluent Filters -Pump1nQ S1a1,on -Power Plan E Eleclncal Ellluenl Fitters -Pump1nQ Slabon -LoQhtonQ Plan E Eleancal Effluenl Fitters -Bottom North Power Plan E Electrical Effluent Fitters -Bottom South Power Plan E Electrical Effluent Fitters -lntermedoate Nortll Power Ptan E Eleclncal Effluenl Fitters -Intermed iate South Power Plan E Electrical Effluenl Fillers -Top Nortll Power Plan E Electrical Effluenl Fillers -TOP South Power Ptan E Eledncal Effluent Fillers -Bottom NDrt11 Lonmmn Ptan E Eledncal Ellluenl Fillers · Bottom S outh Lon"""" Plan E Eleclncal Effluent Fillers -Intermed iate Nor1ll Loamona Plan E Eleclricat Ellluent Fillers -lntermeooate SOUlh I ........, Plan E Eledncal Effluent Fillers -TOP Nortn Lon"""" Plan E Eleclncal EfllueN Fillers -TOP Soutn Loantona Plan E Eledncal Effluent FollerS -Staorwetl 1 I """""' Plan E Eledncal Efluent Fillers • Slaorwetl 2 I """""' Plan Brown and Caldwell • I • 0 Cateaory II II I • • I ~ I I 8/8/011 11 PM • • • - Littleton/Englewood Phase 2 Plant Expansion Project Appendix A. Figure,. Facilities Drawing List Disc Drawma • Title E Electrical Effluent Filters • Stairwell 3 L1ah11na Plan E Electrical HW Electncal Bu1ldina · Power One-Line D1aaram 1 E Electncal HW Electncal Bu1ld1na • Power One-Line D1aaram 2 E Electncal HW Electncal Buildina • Power One-Line D1aaram 3 E Electncal HW Electncal Bu1ld1na • Power One-Line D1aaram 4 E Electncal HW Electncal Bu11d1na • ACC One-Line D1aaram 1 E Electncal HW Electrical Build1na • ACC One-Line D1aaram 2 E Electncal HW Electrical Bu11d1ng • ACC One-Line Diagram 3 E Electncal HW Electncal Bu1ld1ng • Control Diagram 1 E Electrical HW Electncal Building • Control Diagram 2 E Electncal HW Electrical Building • Control Diagram 3 E Electncal HW Electrical Bu1ld ina • Control Diaaram 4 E Electncal HW Eledncal Bu11d ina -Control D1aaram S E Electrical HW Electrical Bulldina • Control D1aaram 6 E Electncal HW Eledncal Bu11dina -Control Diaaram 7 E Electncal HW Electrical Buildina -Conirol Diaaram 8 E Electncal HW Electrical Bu11dina -Panel Scheaules 1 E Electncal HW Eledncal Building • Panel Schedules 2 E Electncal HW Eledncal Bu11d1ng • Power Plan E Electncal HW Eledncal Bu11d1no -L1oht1na Plan E Electncal HW Eledncal Bu11d1na • Ground1na Plan E Electncal Headworl<s • Demo Plan 1 E Electncal Headworl<s -Demo Plan 2 E Electncal Headworl<s · Power Plan 1 E Electncal Headworl<s · Power Plan 2 E Electncal Headworl<s • Power Plan 3 E Eledncal Headworl<s . Power Plan 4 E Electncal Headworl<s -Lighting Plan 1 E Electncal Headworl<s · L,ahtrng Plan 2 E Electrical Headworl<s • Gm T an11 Plan E Electncal Primary Clanfiers • Power Plan 1 E Electrical Primary Clanfiers -Power Plan 2 E Electncal Primary Clanfiers • L,qhl,nq Plan 1 E Electrical Pnmarv Clanfiers • L1ghtmo Plan 2 E Electncal TF • Pump Station Power Plan E Electncal TF -Filter Power & Liahtina Plan 1 E Electrical TF • Filter Power & LIQhtina Plan 2 E Electncal TF Chemical Bu11dina 1 -Power One-Line D1aaram E Electncal TF Chemical Bu11dina 1 • ACC One-Line D1aaram E Electrical TF Chemical Bu11dina 1 -Control Diaaram 1 E Electncal TF Chemocal Bu,ld1ng 1 • Control Diagram 2 E Electncal TF Chemical Building 1 -Panel Schedules E Electncal TF Chemttal Building 1 • Demol~1on Plan E Electncal TF Chemical Bu11d1ng 1 • Power Plan E Eledncal TF Chemical Building 2 -Power One-Line Diagram E Electncal TF Chemical Building 2 -ACC One-Line Diagram E Electncal TF Chemical Bu11d1ng 2 • Control Diagram 1 E Electncal TF Chemical Building 2 • Control Diagram 2 E Electncal TF Cherrncal Building 2 • Panel Sc:neoules E Electncal TF Chemical Building 2 -Power Pian E Electncal TF Chemical Bu,lding 2 • L1ght1ng Plan E Electncal Sec. Clarifier -Power & L,aht1ng Plan 1 E Electncal Sec. Clanfier · Power & L,ghlrng Plan 2 E Eleclncal NTF • Power One-l.Jne uiaaram 1 E Electncal NTF • Power One-Line Diagram 2 E Electncal NTF • ACC One-Line LJ1aaram 1 E Electncal NTF • ACC One-Lr,e u,aaram 2 E Electncal NTF • Control .,._.m 1 • ... ) I • 0 Brown and Caldwell - .. Ca1egory II 'I ., II " " u ,, • ,1 H j II ll - I B 8/8/011 11 PM • • ... • - Littleton/Englewood Phne 2 Plant Expansion Project Appendix A , Figure ,. Fac ilit ies Drawing List o,sc Drawin g# Title E Electnca l NTF . Con1rol Dia gram 2 E Electnca l NTF • Panel Schedules 1 E Electnca l NTF • Demolrt1on Pl an E Electncal NTF . Pump S1a1 1on Powe r Pl an E Electnca l NTF • S.,rv,ce Bu11d1ng Upper Power Plan E Electnca l NTF • S..rv1ce Bu11d1ng Lowe r Power Plan E Electnca l DAFT • Power One·Llne Diagram 1 E Electncal DAFT · Powe r One·L1 ne Diagram 2 E Electnca l DAFT . ACC One·Llne Di ag ram Demo E Electncal DAFT · ACC One·L1ne Diaaram E Electncal DAFT • Control D11aram 1 E Electncal DAF T • Comrol 1ha0ram 2 E Electncal OAFi • Panel Schedules 1 E Electncal DAFT • Lower Power Plan E Electncal OAF T • Upper Power Pl an E Electncal DAFT • Roof Power Plan E Electncal 1-c1eB • Power Qne.L,ne D1aaram E Electncal D,aesler$ • ACC o ne.Line o,aaram E Electncal o-,.ief$ -Comrol o ,aaram 1 E Electncal D,oes1ers • Comrol Diagram 2 E Electncal D,oesle r$ • Comrol Diagram 3 E Eledncal o .... s1ef$ • Con1ro1 O,aaram 4 E Electncal n-s1er$ . Panel Schedules E Electncal 0-..leB • Lower Power Plan E Eledncal O,aesleB • Upper Power Plan E Electncal D1ae11eB . Roof Power Plan E Electncal ""-stet$ • Lower Liah11na Plan E Electncal n-stef$ • Upper L,aht1na Plan E Electncal DiQes1er$ • Roof Liaht1na Plan E Electncal DiQesler$ • Grounding Plan E Electncal Cooen • Misc. Drawing 1 E Electncal C"""n • Misc. Drawina 2 E Electncal Coaen • Misc. Drawina 3 E Eleclrical Coaen • Misc. Drawina 4 E Electncal Cooen . Misc. Drawing 5 E Electncal Dewa1enng • Power One·L1ne Diagram E Eleelncal Dewa1ering • ACC One·L1ne Diagram E Electncal Dewa1enng • COnlrol Diagram E Electncal Dewatenng • Panel Schedules E Electncal Dewalenng • Power Plan E Eleelncal Dewatenna • L"'"''"" Plan E Electncal Service & Supnnn • Power One·L1 ne Diaaram E Electrical S..rvice & Suppon • ACC One·L1ne D1aaram E Electncal Service & Suppon • Panel Schedules 1 E Electncal S..rv1ce & Suooon • Panel Schedules 2 E Electrical Service & Sunnon • Demolition Plan E Electncal Service & Sunnon • Comrol Room Plan E Electncal Service & """""n • Power Plan 1 E Electncal Service & ::,.-an · Power Pian 2 E Electncal Service & ::,.-an . Power Plan 3 E Electncal PS Pump Station · Power One·L1ne Diaoram E Electncal PS Pump Station • ACC One·Line Diaaram E Electncal PS p._ Stat,on • Control Diaoram 1 E Eiectncal PS p._ Station · Control Diaaram 2 E Electncal PS Pumo Stat,on • Panel Schedules E Eleclncal PS p._ Stat,on • Power Plan 1 E Eleclncal PS Pumn Stat,on • Power Plan 2 E Electncal PS p._ Stall0n · Power Plan 3 • ... I • 0 Cateaorv II " II .. • Cateaorv ~~:·~ ,;o.~~..:.:~i~ ~!'.i ...... t ...... .r.n, ... • 8/8/011 11 PM • • • • .. Littleton/Englewood Phase 2 Plant Expansion Project Ap~ndix A. Figure, -Facilities Drawing List Disc Drawina • Tille E Electrical PS Pump Slat,on -L1cht1na Plan E Electrical Sohds Contaci -Power One-Line D1aaram 1 E Electrical Sohds Contact -Power One-Lone D1aaram 2 E Electrical Sohds Contact · Power One-Line D1aaram 3 E Electncal Solods Contaci -Power One-Line Diaaram • E Electncal Solids Contact -ACC One-Line Diaaram 1 E Electncal Solods Contaci -ACC One-Line Diaaram 2 E Elecincal Solods Contaci -Control D,aaram 1 E Electncal Solods Contact -Control Diagram 2 E Electncal Soltds Contaci . Control Diagram 3 E Electncal Solids Comact -Control Diagram 4 E Electncal Soltds Contact. Control Diagram 5 E Electncal Solids Contact -Comrol D1aaram 6 E Electncal Solids Contaci . Control hA<>ram 7 E Electncal Solids Contact -Panel Sclledules 1 E Electncal Soltds Comact -Pa~I Sclledules 2 E Electncal Soltds Contact -Electncal Room Demoht1on Plan E Electncal Solids Contaci -Electncal Room Power Plan 1 E Electncal Soltds Contact . Electncal Room Power Plan 2 E Electncal Sohds Contact -Electncal Room Loa"11na Plan E Electncal Soltds Contact -Blower BUtldina Demolrtoon Plan E Electncal Soltds Contact -Blower BuildITTQ Power Plan E Electncal Soltds Contact -Blower BUIiding L,g"11nQ Plan E Electncal Sol,as Contact , Pump Room Demolrtoon Plan E Electncal Solids Comact -Pump Room Power Plan E E1ectnca1 Solids Contact -Pump Room Loantona Plan E Electncal Soltds Contact -SCT Power & Loamonn Plan 1 E Electncal Solids Contact -SCT Power & L,gnt1nQ Plan 2 E Electncal Solids Contaci -RBS -Power & L,gnt,na Plan 3 E Electncal Centrate Return PS -Power & AC C O~-L1~ Doaaram E Electncal Centrate Return PS -ACC ~-Lone Otagram 1 E Electncal Centrate Return PS -Control l'loanram 1 E Electrical Centrate Return PS -Control l'loanram 2 E Electncal Centrate Return PS -Demolotion Plan 1 E Electncal Centrate Return PS -Power Plan E Electncal Centrate Return Tank -Power & Lighting Plan E Methanol Sloraoae Power and L,gn,,ng • Stte Plan E Methanol Storaoae Power and Lighting -Bull< Storaoae Plan E Methanol Stor..,.. Power and L"""""' -Pump Station Enlaroea Plan E Methanol s,,,,_ Smale Line Jtaaram -MPC & Control Pa~, E Methanol Stor-Facllttv Bull< Stor..,.. Sectoons . Details . Condurt & Cable Schedule E Methanol Stor-Control Schematic I E Methanol Stor-Control Schematic II E Methanol Storaoae Control Schematic 111 E Methanol Storaoae Control Schematic IV Disc DraWITT<I • Hie I l&C SCAOA Svstem Archrtecture 1 I l&C SCAOA Svstem Architecture 2 I l&C SCAOA Svstem Ardlllecture 3 I l&C SCAOA Svstem Archtlecture , I l&C SCAOA Svstem Archtleclure 5 I l&C SCAOA Svstem Archlleclure 6 I l&C SCAOA System Archlleclure 7 I l&C SCAOA System Archiledure 8 Brown and Caio-11 • .. I • 0 Category ····~--~~ ~ r.·~~ • • 8/8/011 11 PM -• • l• :'"'' • - Littleton/Eng-ood Phne 2 Plant Expansoon Pro;.c1 Appandix A . Figure 4 • Facilities Drawing Lisi Disc Drawina• Title I l&C SCADA System Arcnrtect ure 9 I l&C SCADA Syslem ArcMecture 10 I l&C Local Conlrol Panel Layouis 1 I l&C Local Conlrol Panel LayoUls 2 I l&C Local Control Panel LavoUls 3 I l&C Local Control Panel Lavouis 4 I l&C Local Conlrol Panel Lavouis 5 I l&C Local Conlrol Panel Lavouis 6 I l&C Local Conlrol Panel LavoUls 7 I l&C Local Control Panel LavOUls 8 I l&C Local ConlrOI Panel LavOUls 9 I l&C Local Conlrol Panel Lavouis 1 O Dose Dr-• Tttle s Odor SaubbeB • Plan s Odor Scrubbers • Sections and Deartls 1 s Odor Scrubbers • Sections and Detaols 2 s Odor Scrubbers • Sections and Detarls 3 s Odor Scrubbers • Sections and Detarls 4 s Odor Scrubbers . Foul Atr Duct Supports · Plan s Odor Scrubbers • Foul AK Duct SuPPQns • Sections and Detaols 1 s Odor Scrubbers • Foul Air Duct Supports • Sect,ons and Detads 2 s Chemlcal A........., Adart1on • Gr-Plan and Roof Plan s Chemlcal Buoldona Addrtion • Sect,ons and Details 1 s Chemlcal Buoldona AdartlOn • Sectoons and Detaols 2 s Biofiller • Plan and Sections s Boofiller • 8-r Building • Lower Plan and Roof Plan s Boofiller • 8-r Bu,ld,ng • Sectoons and Detaols M Boofiller • 8-r Buoldong • Plan and Sections M Odor Scrubbers . Plan M Odor Scrubbers · Sectlons and Oeaotts 1 M Odor Scrubbers • Sect,ons and Detaols 2 M Odor Scrubbers · Sections and Oelails 3 M Odor Scrubbers • Foul Air Duclwort< • Plan M Odor Scrubbers • Foul Air Duclwort< • Sections and Details 1 M Odor Scrubbers • Foul Air Duclwort< • SeCloons and Details • 2 M Chemocal BuolClnl • Demolotoon Plan M Chemocal Buddona • Oemolotion Photos M Chemocal Buoldona Adartoon • Plans M Chemocal Buoldona Addrtoon • Sections and Detads 1 M Chemocal Buolclona Adart1on • Tank Detaols • • I • 0 • • I• .•. Date September 1 7, 2001 INITIATED BY • • • ' COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Agenda Item cii STAFF SOURCE Subject Br own & Cald\\.ell Disinfection D esign Co ntrac t Li ttl eton/Englewood Supervisory Com mittee Stewart H . Fo nda . tditi es Direc to r COUNCIL GOAL AND PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION .. App roval of the Planni ng and Capac ity Assessment Studv and th e Predesi n Project to r th e Phase _ p roiect . RECOMMENDED ACTION The recommended act ion is to appr ove by motion the A m endment ::> to the Disinfec ti o n D esign Co ntra ct with Brown & Ca ldwell Engi n eers fo r engineeri n g and design o i th e ne\\ Disinfec ti o n System for th e Littleton/Eng lewood WWTP in the amount of $511,788.00. BACKGROUND , ANALYSIS, ANO ALTERNATIVES IDE NTIFIED Br own & Caldwell has completed the pre-design proj ct that identitied spe c ific plant compone nts ne eded to expand the Li ttle t on/Englewood \ as tewater Treatm ent iacili tv to the capacity needed t o m ee t h igher than anticipated population growth in the facility 's sen ice area and othe r regu lat ory req u irements. The pre- design projec t also included the ident itica t ion o f th e reg ulatory \vo rk required to obtain approva l fr o m the \\'akr Qu lit) Con u o l D i\ision (\\'QCD ) and th e Den r Re iona l Counci l of Go\ernments, th e :'.03 planning agenc in the Dem er area . The WQCD ha de\ eloped n ew, m o re stringen t disinfecti on tandards and has issued the Li tt leton, Englewood Wast water Plant a co mplian ce schedule to m ee t th o e requi reme nts . In o rd er to meet th e Februarv ::>oo.; compliance sc h edule dead line to achieve th e new disinfection standard, design o t the new chlorine conta t basins and app urtenant facilities needs to begin immediate! and be bid separate ly from the Phdse ::> proiect to ensure the completion o i th e iacilitv b th e deadline. The scope of wo rk for th e disi nfection sys t em includes comprehensive engineering serv ices fo r project design and bid pe rio d services for th e facilities. Th e A gree men t for enginee rin g senices \~ith Br O\\n & Caldwell is attached. FI NANCIAL IMPACT The cos t oi th e Disin fec ti o n Svstem Design Project is $518.788.00, is a capital co st and will be split 50 50 , ith th e Cit oi Li ttl eton. Funds to begin the project are includ ed in th e 2001 budget. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Brown &. Caldwell Agreemen t fo r Engineering Serv ices ior D isinfection Svs tem Desi gn . I • 0 - • • • .,. • • - A"\1ENDi\,JE>IT ~ TO .. AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENG!NEERE\G SERVICE S BET\\'EEN ClTJES OF LJTTLETON A:--lJ) Ei'iGLE\\'OOD A .. ,D BROWN A.t"\JD CALDWELL FOR DISINFECTION WASTE\\'ATER TREATME~T PLA.t'\/T !MPROVEME:'\TS THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 to the Agreement. made and entered into on this day of ____ , 100 I , by and between the joint n·nture entity comprised of the Cities of Littl eton and Englewood, Colorado. herein collectively referred to as "Owner," a nd Brown and Caldwell, Inc .. a uthori zed to provide engineering services in Colorado. hereinafter referred to as "Engineer .. : WITNESS ETH : WHEREAS, the Cities of L ittleton and Englewood ha\·e entered into a joint use agreement which describes each City's respective rights in and responsibilities for the ownership a nd o peration of the Littleton/Englewood Wastewater Treatment Plant (W\VTP) pursuant to which agreement and contracts may be administered by Englewood on behalf of both Cities; and WHEREAS, Owner and Engineer entered in to a n Agreement o n March 29 , 200 I , to p rovide professional engineering services in connection with implementation of Phase : Littleton/Englewood WWTP Expansion, herein referred to as the "Project"; and WHEREAS, Amendment . 1o. I was executed in August _. 1 00 1, to provide engineering services associated with the Design of Phase 2, and WHEREAS , th e Owner, after considering the Engineer·s request made to the \\'\\'TP SuperYisory Committee on August 16'\ 2001 has determined to reimburse the Engineer for the required services perfom1ed under the te rms a nd conditions set forth h ereafter: 'OW, THEREFORE, Owner a nd Engineer agree to amend the Agreement as follows : I. II. SCOPE OF ENGINEERING SERV ICES The services required are list ed in Exhibit 8-1 .1 SCOPE OF PLAJ\1NED ENGfl\.l:ER!NG SERVICES, DIS!NFECTIO 1 DESIGN . COM PE N SA TIO Compensation for serv ices described above shall be in the lump s um of SS 18. 7 8 .00. PJyment will be as s pecified in Article V I .. Compensation" of the Agreem ent. P 0 ;:.t:i · T ~ l 11l~ng Ph:!Dt-s,~n un1r:1i:t A.mcndmrntA rnendmen l-~ doc doc Amendment 1 August . 2001 Page I of2 .. 'I a ) I • C, - • • • } • .. .. • -.. TN WlT>lESS WHEREOF , the Engineer an d th e O\\·ner do hereby exec ute this A mendm ent 2 to the Agreement. ClTY OF ENGLEWOOD By Title Date BROWN Al\10 CALDWELL, lNC. By Title Date Amendment 2 August 7, :!001 Page 2 of:! 0 I • 0 - • • ----,.,-------------.,-----=-----------------• .. ... .. -t~~ • -.. EXHIBIT 8-1. l SCOPE OF PLANNED ENGINEERING SERVICES DISINFECTION DESIGN (AMENDMENT 2) The following is a swnmary scope of services for the final design of the disinfecti on system expansion for the Linleton/Englewood Wastewater Treatment Plant. This infonnation is supplemented in detail by infonnation contained in Appendix B, ··Drawing List/Engineerin g Design Fees" . .. . , I· 0 - • • • • • - EXHIBIT 8-1.1 SCOPE OF PLAN11i'ED ENGINEERING SERVICES DISJ:rl,ITECTION DESIGN Stage 2 -Program Development Stage 3 -Engineering and Design Stage 4 -Bid Period Services The scope of work includes comprehensive engineering services for project de ign. and bid period services for the facilities described in this Amendment No . 2 to the Agreement. The scope of work for the Disinfection project is based on recommendation o f the Stage I Pre- design findings for the Disinfection Process dated August 2001 . Because of the State 's compliance schedule for the new di infe cti on tandard , de ign o f new chlorine contact basins and appunenant facilities need to be taned immediatel y and bid separately apan from Phase 2 -Amendment I , to ensure the ompletion of the faciliry by the February 2004 deadline. This scope of engineering service for the Di s infecti on sy stem is described in Anicle 3 Project Description . This include service ~ r the entire Di s infecti o n system. However the bid package to be generated from the~ en gi neering ervice . will n"t include all of the drawings and components of this design. onl y th ose haded m Figure 3 - Facilities Drawing list. The reason for this is to develop a set o f contract documents for o nly the ponion of the Disinfection system that is needed to comply with the new !units . The project will consist primarily of the structural discipline which will include the two new Chlorine Contract Tanks (CCTs). The remaining design will be included in the Phase 2 contract documents to be bid in late 2003 . The design of the whole system. not just the tructural discipline (CCTs), should occur simultaneously as this approach will ensure the rwo designs are compatible with each other . Article I -Program Development Engineer shall prepare reports required by state and local regulatory and planning agencies . A Utility Plan and a site application is not included in this scope. Specific Anicle I tasks to be perfonned by Brown and Caldwell include the following: Task IOI Coordination \\1th Regulatory Agencies. Engineer will prepare documentation required for review by regulatory agencies. Activities to be perfonned under this task include : Exhibit B-1 .1 August 8, 2001 Page I of 7 • ) I· 0 • • -• • • - a . C oordinati on wi th Eng lewood Fire Depa nmem to de\·e Jo p build ing cup a ncy cla ss ifi ca ti ons . ir e acce fo r emergency ve hicl es . and interprerari n of na t io nal and loca l fire cod e requ irements . b . Submit sea led proj ect plans and specificati ons to the Engle wood Building Depanmem and re spo nd to re view co mment s . Upon acc eptance of th e re viewed contract doc uments. iss ue rw o sets o f final plans and spe cifications with sea l a nd signature of a regi stered Profe ss ional Eng ineer or regi stered Profess io na l Architect to the Building Depanrnem . c . Prepare a "Reque st to Amend a Previous Site Approval-and submit it 10 th e CDPHE . d . Submit one set of project plans and specificati on s to the CDPHE . Calculati on notebooks will be sent if requested . C oordinate and respond to que sti ons or concerns the deparnnent may have . Task 102 Stonnwater Construction Pennit. Prepare a C o lorad o General Permit No ti ce of Intent (NOi) and submit to CDPHE for re view and approval. Prepare a to rmwat er management plan (SWMP) to prevent contamination of surface waters by erosion , se diment . or other pollutants during project construction . The SWMP shall provide a narrati ve de scripti o n o f drainage area affected by construction activities , surface water bodies , significant material s exposed to stonnwater. method of on-site storage or disposal , material s loading and acce ss areas. locati o n and description of existing structural and non-structural control measures to reduce po llut:1nts. The plan will include pollution risk identificaticm and as se ssment . preventi ve maint enance procedures . and proposed best management practices during constructi on. Task 103 Engineer's Opinion of Cost. A detailed opinion o f co nstruction costs will be prepared based on 90-percent design completion le vel documents . The summary categories shall be subdivided into smaller elements sufficient to provide a reasonable estimate of project cos t under competitive bidding conditions . The estimate shall represent probable construction cost fo r the project based on published , historical cost data . The cost opinion shall not be co nstrued a a guarantee that actual construction c ontract price will be below the cost opinion amount . References for the co st data sources used to prepare the cost opinion shall be included . Article 2 -Engineering and Design Services De sign services will include preparation of engineered plans. technical specifications. and co ntract documents for the Phase 2 project elements defined in Stage 1 Pre-design Di sinfection sys tem . Design services include work in the major architectural and engineering discipline s required to provide complete and functional systems and facilitie s for each of the project elements defined in this scope of wo rk . Eng ineered sy stems designed under this stage of the work include itew ork : hydraulics: architectural e lements ; structures: treannent system processes : mechanical sys tems : heating. ventilation. and coolin g sys tems: electrical system: instrumentation; an<l • Exhibit B-1 . I August 8. 2001 Page 2 o f 7 I • 0 - • • • ~- • -" proces conuols . Specific services include space planning for buildings and structures . development of horizo ntal and vertical survey controls , drainage and grading. devel o pment of design criteria. performance of engineering analysis and design calculations. sizing a nd layout of equipment including verification of critical dimensions. piping , and construction details at an appropriate scale to clearly communicate contract requirements. coordination of engineering systems to minimize potential conflicts during construction and verification of compliance with applicable national and local building codes. Other specific Article 2 design tasks to be performed by the Engineer include the following: Project Management. Develop and maintain project sc hedule , assign and supervi e project staff. monitor work budgets. provide general conuact administration , and prepare monthly invoices . Administration of subconsultant work. guidance of technical direction. project planning , and coordination of quality assurance activities are also included in thi s task. This task includes project management services during Article I Program Development. Article 2 Engineering and Design Services and Article 4 Bid Period Services . Engineer shall provide a monthly status report to Owner briefly sumrnanzmg progres during the previous month , budget status and schedule status. The status report would also identify proposed modifications o the project scope. along with the design and construction co t impact of the proposed modifications. No design work will be undertaken on p roposed modifa::nicns until authorized t-y the Superv isory Committee . Ke y issues requiring Owner action or direction would also be included in the monthly status report . Project Documentation. The Engineer shall maintain a comprehensive project no tebook and calculation notebook . All technical memoranda and pertinent design information shall be routinely incorporated into the notebook . One copy of the updated notebook shall be submined to the Owner and updated on a monthly basis for review during project development . Upon completion of project plans and specifications. one final copy of the project calculation no tebook shall be ubmined to the Owner for future reference . Progress Meetings. Coordination and project development meetings will be held between Engineer and Owner throughout the course of the Project. This task includes preparation for and anendance at meeting plarmed to occur generally once per month . The number of anendees and frequency of meetings will vary depending on status of the Project. Engineer shall prepare and distribute wrinen progre s meeting summaries to all anendees and the project notebook . Quality Assurance. Senior technical advisors will provide periodic assistance and re vi ew during development of proccs diagrams. con1rol descriptions. and detailed engineered drawing and spec ifications . General confonnance to industry standards, good engineering practice. and proper application of technology will be assessed throughout projc:ct development . Tc:chnical Exhibit 8-1 . 1 August 8. 2001 Page 3 of 7 . I • 0 • • • • • • A mem oranda will be prepared summarizing re sult f mile tone review s and key project deci ion s. C oo rdination and re vi ew of the conrra ct doc ument with the owner will occur around the 30 percent and 60 percent de sign completion level . Comments from this meeting will be rec orded and incorporated. A coordination check of the Pha se 2 Project contract documents will be performed at the 90-percent design completion level. Work depicted in the documents for various de sign disciplines will be reviewed to ensure that the plans and specifications are clear. consistent. and constructible . Design conflicts will be identified and corrected . Simultaneously with the coordination check, 3 copies of the drawings shall be provided to the Owner for review . The design will be finalized based on the coordination check and 90-percent de sign re view comments from the Owner. Contract Documents. Final engineered plans. specifications. and contract doc uments for Phase 2 Project shall be prepared following the coordination check . Engineered plans shall be organized by construction disciplines including process diagrams . architectural , structural. mechanical , HV AC , electrical and instrumentation divi sions . Specifications shall be prepared in the Engineer 's standard modified Construction Specification Institute format. A list of the anticipated drawings is shown in Appendix A. Figure 4 . of thi s scope of work. The drawing li st is preliminary and is intended for general use and a starting point. Drawing total s will be added and subtracted depending on the final design for each of the process areas . The scope of work or changes shall not be based on the actual drawing count. but on the following description of the scope as detailed in Article 3 Project Description . The majority of Project Management costs are included in the Phase 2 design -Amendment 8 -1 which will be occurring simultaneously . Onl y the additional costs associated for separating th e designs and bid packages are included . They are listed in Appendix 8. Figure 2. General Activities . Article 2 engineering and design services will be provided for the following tasks listed under Article 3 Project Description . Article 3 -Project Description The following task presents a description of the proposed facilities and modifications to Di sinfection system for improving the UE WWTP and expanding the capacity to comply with State regulatory requirements . The Disinfectio n improvements were established in the Phase 2 Pre-design report completed in August 2001 with program development. detail design and bidding services to follow this planning report . Treatment plant components included under this design phase are described in the fo ll ow ing paragraphs . Exhibit 8 -1.1 August 8. 2001 Page 4 of 7 I • 0 • • • • I• ... ·- • -' Disinfection. The new permit requires a chan ge in di s infecti o n detecti on limit Spe ificall y . £. co li i monito red instead of fecal co li fo rm s. Th e State require s that a complian e "chedule f r the e new limit s be met by February of 200~. Tw o new chl orine contact tank will be de igned and bid in late 2002 se paratel y fr om the Pha se 2 proj ect. The non -potable sys tem will be expanded for Pha se 2 . Modificati ons 10 the exi tin g system will be de signed along with a new non-pot building . Thi s building will be de igned with a future UV process in mind . The existing chemical building will be expanded for the increase in capaci ty . A separating sodium hydroxide (NaOH ) building will be included . Disinfection Contract Electrical and Controls Area Equipment Modification Non-Pot PS I Electrical System Replace existing MCC Disinfectio n Electrical S) stem I Provid e a new dual feed electrical , tern wnh au1oma11c transfer control to fe ed the exi st ing and n ew disinfection bu ildin gs as we ll a the new n o n-pot pump stat ion . The exist ing non-po l pump stati o n can cont inue to be fed fr o m t he Dewatering building. Pro , ide UPS backup fo r critical chemical m etering pumps and instruments . l&C ACCx , Pro, ide PLC cabinets for the existing and new dismfec11on buildings as well as the existing and n e " non-pot pump tat ion Rem ove hard-wired connection to DA FT PLC A summary of Lhe process and infrastructure impro vements are li sted in the Table below : Recommended lmpro,,ements to Disinfection PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Chlorine Contact Tanks: Futur, Capacity Desig n and con struction 10 be bid !Number se parate !) from Pha e 2 . !Volume. each Minimum hydraulic retent ion ume (HRTJ (at peak flow ) New ;,ion--pot Pump Sta tion 'Size and locati o n to be determined during design Modify existing ;,ion-pot PS Replace ex!Sling pumps and o th er modifications to be determined. Ne"' '.'laOH building !Size and locauon to be determined during des ign Infrastructure !Add catwalks 10 ex1 sung tanks • I 1 additional 150.150 ft ' 130 m in I I I I I I SO mgd Exhibu 8 -1 I August . _00 1 P:i ge • of . I • 0 - • • • • • - Articl e 4 -Bid Period Services Engi ne er sha ll pro vide as ista nc e to Owne r fo r awa rd of a constructi o n contrac t by m ea ns of competitive bidding proc edure . The Engineer sha ll p re pare project de sc ription and in vita ti o n to bid and ass ist owner in publi hin g public noti ce s. The En gineer shall al so distribute co ntrac t d oc ument s to pros pect ive bidders. manage doc ument deposi t . and re spo nd to infomiat ion requests fr om prospecti ve bidder . Addenda to the pl ans and specificati ons will be pre pared. if neces sary. Engineer shall anend the bid o pening. ana lyze th e results . and prepare a lett er t th e Owner summarizing the bid anal y sis . The lener will p rov id e a rec ommendati on fo r awa rd f th e contract. Engineer shall perfo rm the foll owing ta sks : Task 401 Advertise and Distribute Documents. Pre pare an adverti sement desc r ibi ng the project and availabili ty of bi dding documents . Pu b li h thi s ad verti sement in up to 4 loca l newspapers and co nstructi o n indu stry periodical . Print 30 set s of contract documents and distribute contract documents to prospecti ve bidder and constructi o n indu stry plan rooms . The Engineer will charge and retain an appropriate amount . nonrefundable fee for each compl e te e t of half-size drawings and specifications to defray printing costs . Task 402 Prebid Conference. Assist O wner to che dule and conduct a p rebid conference . At prebid conference . present sco pe of p rojec t. co ntract requirements. b id d in g procedures , subcontract and minori ty business partic ip ati on goals . contracto r qu ali fi a t i n certification. licenses and constructio n permit is ue . procurement and la bor regu lat io n ·. geotechnical info rmation , project sc hedule and co nstructi on se quencing . bid eva lu ation . and contract award procedures . P rov ide a to ur o f the s it e to prospective bidders . Identify and c lari fy bid d er 's que stions and answer th em t-y addendum . Di ~tri1'ute a r re l-id confe re nce anend ance Ii . t to all planholders . Task 403 Contract Addenda. Respond to ora l. te lephone . or fa c imile que t i n received from bidders concerning clarifications to draw ing s and specifi catio ns . Maintain a wr inen record o f all oral or telephone discuss io ns with pros pective bidders and suppliers conducted during the bid period . C omments, clarificatio ns , or di sc uss ions whi ch signifi cantl y affect interpretati on of contract requirements shall be iss ued by formal addenda . Prepare up to 3 addenda fo r re visio ns to draw ing s and specifications for iss ue prior to bid date . Task ~ Bid Opening and Bid E,•aluation. Anend bid opening and ass ist Owner to o pe n and publicly read the bid s . verify bids are complete , and announc e apparent low bidder. Pro vide ass istance to the Owner in evaluating bid proposal s. prepare a bid ev alu ation leuer repo rt , and ad vise the Owner re ga rding contract award . Engineer shall present re sults of the bid ev aluati on at the re gular monthl y meetings o f the Littleton/Englewood Supervisory C ommittee . Task 405 Contract Award . Anend up to ::! meetings with the Owner and CDPHE re presentatives during the "auth ori ty to award " process. U pon autho rization by Owner . prepare a Noti ce of Award fo r Owner ' s ignature and transmit by ce rtified mail to success ful b idder . Return bid bond s to a ll other bidders . Re ceive , re view , and ve rify completeness of preawa rd P O:u.:i GE'-i lL1tJm,Jlh:?Dcs1gnC n nc:t E\tuNu E\H-8-1 I CCTs f--1 ~A L Joe • Exh ibit 8 -l . I August 8 . :?00 l Page 6 o f 7 .. I • 0 • • .. • - submittals. Equal Opponunity Cenifications. Minority and Women Bu si ne ss Enterprise panicipation. insurance cenificates. and performance and payment bonds . P DulGE1' Lwcn,""ll0..1,.COftfKI E.lhll>n!IEXH-8-1 I CCT, ANAL doc • Exhibit B-1 . I August 8. 2001 Page 7 of 7 •, I • 0 - • • • l• • • APPENDIX B DRAWING LIST/ ENGINEERING DESIGN FEES DISINFECTION CONTRACT The following spreadsheet provides a summary of the anticipated de sign work under this contract. The information is broken out as follows : -Figure I: Discipline Summary -Figure 2: General Activities -Figure 3 : Facilities Drawing List • I . 0 e . ' ' . ' I~ G . . . -' ' 0 . > Littleton/Englewood Phase 2 Pl ant Expansion Project • Disinfection Append ix B . Figure 1 . Discipline Summary PR OJECT SUMMAR Y IN F ORMATI ON Summary By Discipline: Labor ODC . D1s c1 plme Graphics Cos urnb ·r of Tot,11 Co,-1 DisciRllne Cateaorles .. , Code Engineering Drafting Re production Cornmuni cat,ons Computer Drawing Drawings 01 .,, ,r,ll nr, General G $500 $500 $270 $52 $150 $1,472 28 $-11 "1• Ar chi tectural A $2 ,500 $750 S50 $80 $200 $3 ,580 5 $17 .'Jflll Ci vil C $2 ,500 $750 $80 $60 $200 $3 ,590 7 s:5.130 Structural s $2 ,500 $1,000 $170 S60 $400 $4 ,130 17 $7 0.2 10 Mechanical M $2,500 $1 ,000 $1 30 $60 $3 00 $3,990 13 S "i l 'l, HVAC H $2 ,500 $1,000 $130 $60 $300 $3,990 4 $15 .'1, 11 Process p $2,000 $750 $70 $60 $1 20 S3 ,000 6 $1 8 ,()fl(J Electrical E $1,500 $1,000 $350 $60 $44 0 $3 ,350 35 $ 1 t 7 2°0 ln strumenl alion & Control (l&C ) I $2 ,200 $1 ,000 $30 $60 $100 $3 ,390 3 $1 0,170 Total Drawin gs= 118 Tot al Dr awmg Cost= S1fi 7 7;.,, :; {~ ~1 ,: , •. t· ! ., . .. I'~.-?.. t ,, ..... .~ Total Total CosV . ~. ~ ..... :=-:"·: -i ·' .. ~ . .: t". Number of Add • Add1t1ona1 .:. -~ " ~-· · .. -;,. J':""'> CosV Drawing Drawings Categories Project Ma nage menVGenera l Office/GADD N/A N/A Included in Special Activt lies and Pha se 2 Spe cia l Acti vitie s N/A N/A $77 ,332 (See Figure 3) Spec. Deve lopme nt & Processing ( 4) $300 118 $35 ,400 In terdisciplinary/QC Reviews $150 11 8 $17 ,700 Total Drawing Cost $367 ,70 Bidding Allowance $175 118 $20,650 Total Add1ttonal Cost $1 51.,082 • Total Add Cost = $151,082 Total Contract Cos t $518 ,788 '- 8/8/013 .36 PM B ro wn and Cald,: II - {_ • 96 • •,. -"' !1 & . i C;olegOry ~ Prwnary Rap. J ~ POTasa 101 ~Fq Oep 16 ~11,Mngl>ep. 2, -SIie Aj>picallon 10 PO Ta..-103 s---• PO Ta sk 105 90% Cost Opnon a E & 0 Task 20 1 Projecl M _. 80 Totats 1'2 • • 8/8/013 .30 PM -• • • • Littleton/Englewood Phase 2 Plant bpansion Project Appendix B, Figure 2 -Special Activities Estmaled Hours Other Direct Co sts I I i I I I I I I ~ I UJ "' . r I ~ I l ~ ~ C UJ I ~ I C 5 I < l r ,!I UJ I \! I I ~ I fi i UJ I I , .. t ~ i i I -~ ~ .~ 2, 20 16 I 10000 I 200 00 I '° 20 16 I 50000 s 200 00 s '° 10 I 100 00 s 200 00 s a ,o a s 20000 I 200 00 I 80 '° s 30000 s 20000 s 80 216 I 10000 s ,oo 00 I 120 152 '° ,o 0 306 I I 1,30000 11 1.<00 00 I • . , 0 ~ i i f . § ~ . u 0 " E :,: u 0 . E ! u ; 0 .8 u u C ! ~ 0 "' ~ J "i . .o ~ ~ 20000 76 I 6 .964 00 s 50000 s 7 464 00 20000 100 s 9 .660 00 s 90000 s 10 560 00 20000 60 s 6 .!60 00 s 50000 s 7 360 00 0 s s s 20000 60 I 5 ,188 00 s 60000 s 5 78e 00 0 S s s 20000 126 s 11 ,360 00 s 70000 s 12,06000 1.000 00 376 s 32.600 00 s 1,500 00 s 34 .10000 2.000 00 s 72,632 00 I 4 ,700 00 s 7/.33700 0 B rown and Caldwell Category ' - Category ... -.! · .. ' .. ~ .,. -~ ,, .. • • Ca1egorv .. - 818/011 •2 PM -• • t--..... .. . ' • -.. LitUeton/Engtewood Phase 2 Plant Expansion Project Appendix 8 , Figure 3 -facilities Drawing List Disc Dra win Q • nue G LocallonNic,nity Map/S,te Plan/Key Map (CCn G Draw ,na lost 1ccn G Srte Pta n (CCT) G Srte Survev Control Pla n ICCT) G Des,on Data (CCn G I Svmbols and Abbreviations G Process Schemat,c & DeslQn Data Summary (CC n G Hvdraultc Profile (CCn Drsc Draw,na • Title A Non-pot Pumping Station 2 -Elevations 1 A Non-oot Pumpmo Station 2 -Roof Plan A NaOH Bu1ld1ng -Elevations A NaOH Butld1na -Roof Plan A Mtscellaneous Arcn11ectural Drawing H Non-oot Pumoina Station 2 -HVAC Schematic H Non-oot Pumping Station 2 -HVAC Plan and Sections H NaOH Butldina -HVAC Schematic H NaOH Bu11dtna -HVAC P lan and Sections M Non -pot PufflPino Station 1 -Pump Replacement -Plan M Non-DOI Pumn1nn Station 1 -PumD Reolacement -Sections and Detail M Non-pot Pumnmo Station 2 -Uooer Plan M Non-POt Pumoma Statton 2 -Lowe< Plan M Non-oo1 P1 lffW'lll'V'I Stattan 2 -Sections and Details 1 M Non-oat Pumc»na StabOn 2 -Sections and Detatls 2 M NaOH Bullcltna -Plan M NaOH Butld,na -Sections and Details 1 M NaOH Buolcl,na -Sect,ons and Details 2 M Drstnlect,on Butldtna -Demolot,on Plan M Drs,nteet,on Buil0111Q -Demoltl,on Photos 1 M Drstnlect1on Bullclona -Demolrt,on Photo,; 2 M Drsonlect,on Butldma -Mecnan,cal Modtf1cat1on s s C-Contact T-• 1-3 -Catwalk Adclrt,ons -Plan s Chlome Comact T-• 1-3-Catwalk Adel-.. -Sect,ons and Detatls s C-Contact Tanks 4 and 5 • '--L•vef Plan s Chlonne Contact T-• 4 and 5 -Lower Level Plan s Chlome Contact T-s 4 and 5 • Sect,ons and o.ta,is 1 s Chlome Cantact T-• 4 and 5 • Sect,ons and Details 2 s Chlonne Contact Tanks 4 and 5 -Sect,ons and Details 3 s Non-pot Pumotna Stat,on 2 -F oundat,on Plan s Nnn-nnt P unv,,na Stat,on 2 -Operat,na Level P lan s Non-pot Pumotna Statiori 2 -Roaf Plan s Non-pot Pumcma Statiori 2 -Sections and Deta~s 1 s Non-pot Pump,na Statiori 2 -Secttons and Deta~s 2 s NaOH Buoldtna -F oundat,on Plan s NaOH Builc:hna -Gracie Level Plan s NaOH Building • Roof P lan s NaOH Buikl1na · Sections and De1a,ls 1 s NaOH Bu~dtna -Sections and Detatl• 2 Disc Drawma• Title C Pav,na and Grading C Yard P1n111n C Yard P101na Profiles and Oetatts -Pro#Wes for > 12"' P1DUlCI Brown and Calawe ll • I • 0 - CateQory Cateoorv .:~·},."! ~ i . . • C ate<lorv •, . ,.. ,. y 1 ---DI 11 a~·,, • • 8/8/0 11 •2 PM • • • - LittletonlEnglewood Phase 2 Plant Expansion Project Appendix B, Figure 3 • Facilities Drawing List o,sc Draw1nQ • Title C Yard P1p1nQ Profiles and Details -Profiles for> 12· Piping C Yard P1p1na Profi~s tor > 12" P,p,na C Miscellaneous OnSlte P1pmg C M1sce ll aneous/Addrt1ona l Metenna Vault Details Di sc Dr awing• rrt1e E Eleclncal General Sije Plan Area 6 E Electncal General Sije Plan Area 7 E Electncal General Substation Plan 1 E Electncal General Sul>station Plan 2 E Electrical Gerieral Plant Power 0 1stnbut1on Demo One-Line Diagram 1 E Electncal SHC -Powe< One-Line .Jtaaram E Eleclncal SHC -ACC One-Line Oiaaram E Eledrical SHC -Control Diaaram 1 E Eleetncal SHC -Control Dtaoram 2 E Electrical SHC -Panel SclledUtes 1 E Electncal SHC -Panel Sche0ules 2 E Electrical SHC -Demolrt1on Plan E Eleetncal SHC • Powe< Plan E Electrical SBS -Powe< One-Lone Dtagram E Electncal SBS -ACC One-Line Dtaoram E Electncal SBS -Control Dtaaram 1 E Electncal SBS -Control Dtaoram 2 E Eledncal SBS -Panel Scneoules 1 E Electncal SBS -Panel Scneoules 2 E Eledncal SBS • Power Plan E Elecmcal SBS -L,amono Pian E Electnail Non.Pot PS 1 -Powe, One-line rJ<aar am E Elecmcal Non.Pot PS 1 -ACC One-Linl! Diaoram E Electncal Non.Pot PS 1 -Control Dta gram 1 E Eleclncal Non-Pot PS 1 -Control Di aaram 2 E Eledncal Non-POI PS 1 • Panl!I Scneoutes E Eleclncal Non-Pot PS 1 -Demo1t11on Plan E Electncal Non.POI PS 1 -Power Pian E Electncal Non-POI PS 2 -Power One-Line Diaoram E Eleclncal Non-POI PS 2 -ACC One-Line Dtaaram E Electncal Non-Pot PS 2 -Control Doaaram 1 E Elecmcal Non-Pot PS 2 -Control Doaaram 2 E Electncal Non.Pot PS 2 -Panel Sche0ules E Electncal Non-POI PS 2 • Power Plan E Electncal Non-Pot PS 2 -L!Qht ino Plan Otsc Oraw1nQ II Title p CCT -Ora1naoe Svstem p CCT -5&6 p Non Pot -Ex1St1ng p Non Pot -New p Sod1umBiaulfile p SOCl,um ...vnrvTUonte Brown and CaiOwell 0 I • 0 - Gateaorv · .. """' , Ca f'",jji) --. 818/011 :42 PM • • - Lifllelon/Englnwood Phae 2 Plant Eq,anslon Project "-ndi• a, Figu .. 3 • Fac:1-Drawifl9 Llat Disc Draw1na • rrtle I l&C SCAOA System ArchHecture 1 I l&C SCAOA Svstem Archdeclure 2 I l&C Local ContrOI Panel Layouts 1 Oise n.-...., r111e -.. -,,..," G Standard CM! Details -G Common -Dllails G Common -Dllails G Common ,..__ Restraints G Struclural Genefal Noles G r ...... -Structural Details G Tvnical Struclural Details G r ......... Struc1ura1 Details G Tvnical Struclural Detail G r-Struclural Detail G T......._ Struclural Detail G AlchilecluralStandardDetails G -Detaila . G Mac:hanlcal Dlltails • Strudural Attachmenll G -Dlllails • ....,. Penetrations G -Slandard Details G ~ Standanl Details 1 G lnslrumenlalion Standard Details 2 G Eleelricat Slandard Details 1 G EJactncal Slandard Details 2 .. . ' 0 I • 0 e,-, and Caldwetl - • --~ ... , / Gary Sears 09/17/2001 09 :02 AM To : #All E-Mail Users cc : Subject : Monday activities • .. • • .. At Monday's City Council meeting, City Council will issue a proclamation in honor of the lives lost and -the heroic efforts displayed during the national tragedy on September 11th. The Mayor will read the proclamation on Monday evening at 5 :45 p.m . in front of the flagpoles on the CityCenter Piazza. We would welcome all employees who wish to attend this observance . As always, thank you for your efforts. Gary (Please forward this menage to employees without access to e-mail.) ... ~-----------. -- ... I • 0 • • 1. 2. 3 . 4. 5. • I• .•' • - THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL ~ SEPTEMBER 17, 2001 MO,JBRf 7:30 P.M. Englewood Civic Center 1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood , CO 80110 Call to order. V(:2:,f ~ Invocation ./)~ Pledge of Allegiance . ~ Minutes. _ ~ ~ /1. tiff-' 6.t/Ja . Minutes from the meeting of Regular City Council Meeting of September 4, 2001 ~~ 6 . F''"°"· (~"" limi, yo "' p,eseo~,ioo ,o too mio"'~.( ~ J::sd;v~iis . rJoltmit your pr~~~,n l~i;;z;~ ~1 ~ (c 6 C=m~~ P.oct<t.':ioof~ ~o,m~ff'7 ~ ~7 ~ ,. A pmd,m .. iM decl.,iog Septembe< 19, ,001 "R~, Equ,li<y D,y. ~ '.,dl•llj / .b . 0 A proclamation declaring the week of September 16 throu~ 2.2 . JO~_ as Yellow rr:-l/.., Ribbon Youth Suicide Awareness and Prevention Week. I')~ ~c. A ~'!!itJ: appointing Judge Marcia O 'Brien as A~n1t3I '/ff'd~ d_ P"~ic Heariog ;Jl:~,,I.~ fr~ • A Public Hearing to gather citizen input on the City of Englewood's proposed 2002 Budget. Copies of the propOled "Budget in Brief" will be available in the Library, theFOCd~~iU{Jt~~~~f// Please note: If you MW! a diNbility ud .-NI Mlliliary aidl or semces, please notify the City of Englewood (303-762-2405) at lust 41 '-" ill M\lam of when lefflt"ft are MeClecl. Thank you . . I • 0 • • • • - Engl ew ood City Council Agenda September 17, ~001 Pag e~ aai/.~ _ . ~~ 10. Consent Agen~..;{)a) V'>t[:(;l a. b. Approval of Ordinances on First Reading . Appro£ordinances o n Second Readin g. ii. Council Bill No. 56, accepting a Highway Traffic Saiety Project Grant from the Colorado State Department of Publi c Health and Environment in the amount of $4 ,200. Council Bill No. 57, accepting the dedication of 22 square feet of right·of-way at :!001 W . Baker Ave nue. c. Resolutions and Motions. i. Recommendation from the Library Department to approve a motion auth o rizin g the Library to apply to the State of Co lorado for funds under th e annu al State Grants to Libraries program . STAFF SOURCE: Hank Long. Director of Library Services. 11 . Regular Agenda . a . Approval of Ordinances on First Readin g. i. ~I Jrlfllr!V : ~ COUNCI. tllll NO. 59 · Recommendation from the Utilities Departmen t to adopt a bill for an ordinance authorizing a City Ditch License Agreement with TCI Cablev ision of Georgia/ A~ ,~ro!~b;p91' AFF SOURCE: Stewart H. Fonda, Director of Utilities. !J ~ b . C. ii . COUNCIL Bill NO. 60 -Recommendation from the City Manager's Office to adopt a bill for an ordinance approv ing the TI1ird Amendment to the Intergove rnmental Agreement with the Regional Transportation District (RTD ). reimbursing the City of Englewood for work performed by the City and the Englewood Environmental Foundation on be)1'of R1D: 1TAFF SOURCE: Michael Flaherty, Assistant City Manager.~~ Approval of Ordinances on Second Readin g. Reso~ns and Motions. i. ~~v Recommendatio n from the Littleton/Englewood Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisory C ommi ttee to approve. by motion, Amendment 1 to th e Professi o nal Engineering Services Contract with Brown & Caldwell in the amount of $5,950,364 for Phase 2 Wastewater Treatme~l!n~~pJ°veme~. STAFF SOURCE: Stewart H. Fonda, Utilities Director. /P~ • ii . ~fr() Recommendati on from th e Littleton/Englewood Wastewater Treatment Plant Supef\isory Committee to appro e, by motion, Amendment 2 to the Pr oiessional Engineering Services Contract with Brown & Caldwell in the amount or $518,:0 88 for Disintect1on Wastewater Treatment Plant ,0,._ • 1 J. _ Improvemen ts . STAFF SOURCE: Stewart H. Fonda. Utilities Director. fl~ Pleue note: If you haw a diullilily Md Med ___, aids or lefflCft, p1eaR notify the City of Englewood (303-762-2405) at least• '-n in Ml/MU of when temCft are ...ded. Thank you . ) I • 0 - • • • .. • • Englewood Ci ty Co un ci l A genda Se ptember 17, 200 1 Page 3 • 12 . General Discussion . a. May or's Choice. b. Council Members' Choice. 13 . City Manager's Report. 14. Ci ty Att ome~i's Report Adjournment. 9'; 3)-~ The following minutes were transmitted to City Council between August 31 and September 13 , 2001: The Englewood Cultural Arts Commission meeting of August 1, 2001 The Englewood Liquor Licensing Authority meeting of August 15 , 2001 The Englewood Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of August 21 , 2001 ,.._ note: If ,au haw • tlullillty wl need auxiliary as or 5emCft, plow noCify die City al Englewood (303-762-2405) •• !eat 41 houn in ---al when lftYic:es .re needed. Tunli you. • .. ... ... I • 0 3 X • --. - I fill ~ ~tUA--oJ ~~ fU ~-~()~ 3 .~~~~ 1. /?Jd_ M _. ~-. .,, v- -. . ~---• • . - ' •, 0 I . 0 • e e . - ... •. 0 • I . • • . . • . - ... •, . ... I . 0 • • ' . , . • -' 0 • • I . 0 • •